ACL2026

Abstract:
AI agents struggle to operate within open and dynamic environments because they lack a fundamental capacity: the autonomous generation of abstractions. Current models remain static entities, incapable of compressing the infinite complexity of the real world into generalisable concepts once their training phase has concluded.We introduce EVA (Evolving Agents), a novel paradigm for autonomous learning driven by pseudo-symbolic abstraction. EVA introduces a meta-control system that dynamically orchestrates observation and active interaction to distil on-the-fly abstract representations of states, actions, and goals. By disentangling contextual noise from pure logical reasoning, these pseudo-symbolic abstractions allow the agent to construct a highly robust internal curriculum.EVA leverages these self-generated abstractions to form an internal curriculum. This continuous compression of raw sensorimotor experience into reusable concepts allows the agent to independently guide its own exploration, planning, and error correction. Structured upon a bi-level evolutionary-developmental (Evo/Devo) framework, EVA demonstrates how the dynamic refinement of abstractions enables rapid adaptation to unforeseen scenarios. This approach resolves the domain mismatch problem and lays the groundwork for truly autonomous, continuously evolving AI models.

Abstract:
We introduce Doublespeak, a simple in-context representation hijacking attack against language models. The attack works by systematically replacing a harmful keyword (e.g., bomb) with a benign token (e.g., carrot) across multiple in-context examples, provided as a prefix to a harmful request. We demonstrate that this substitution leads to the internal representation of the benign token converging toward that of the harmful one, effectively embedding the harmful semantics under a euphemism. As a result, superficially innocuous prompts (e.g., "How to build a carrot?") are internally interpreted as disallowed instructions ("How to build a bomb?"), thereby bypassing the model’s safety alignment. We use interpretability tools to show this semantic shift occurs progressively across layers. Doublespeak is optimization-free, broadly transferable across model families, and achieves strong success rates on closed-source systems, reaching 74% on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct with a single-sentence context override. Our findings highlight a new attack surface in LM latent space, indicating that current alignment strategies are insufficient and should instead operate at the representation level.

Abstract:
Although the Universal Transformer (UT) mitigates the diminishing returns of standard LLM scaling by decoupling parameter count from depth, it remains constrained by linear computational costs and rigid weight-sharing mechanisms. These limitations lead to severe functional homogeneity, which subsequently induces over-smoothing, representation rank collapse, and degraded reasoning performance. In this work, we present the first systematic study of Compute Distribution Skew, identifying it as the primary driver of extrapolation failure. This is a pathological phenomenon in ultra-deep recurrent Transformers characterized by a disproportionate distribution of contributions across recurrent steps, resulting in distinct functional states during prefix and suffix processing phases. To address this challenge, we propose the Polymorphic Transformer, which aims to achieve functional polymorphism and depth sparsity within a shared-parameter framework. By integrating conditional sparse subspaces, SiLU Attention, and an uncertainty-aware depth scheduler, our architecture mitigates power-method collapse and effectively decouples logical depth from computational cost. Experiments demonstrate that our model significantly enhances representation rank and robustness, achieving complex reasoning performance comparable to baseline while reducing computation by 64.7%.

Abstract:
Existing In-context Learning (ICL) typically assumes the retrieval dataset contains demonstrations for all output label spaces. However, in real-world scenarios, delays in dataset updates or incomplete data annotation may result in the retrieval dataset containing labeled demonstrations for only a subset of the output space. We refer to this phenomenon as an incomplete retrieval dataset and define the in-context learning under this condition as Incomplete In-context Learning (IICL) . To address IICL, we propose Iterative Judgments and Integrated Prediction (IJIP) , a framework with train-free and train-based variants. For classification, the iterative judgments stage of IJIP reformulates an (m)-class problem into (m) binary tasks, converting IICL into standard ICL. The integrated prediction stage of IJIP then refines results using both the input and initial predictions. We further extend IJIP to text regression and generation, and introduce lightweight variants that reduce computation and token costs. Across six LLMs, seven tasks, and eight datasets, IJIP achieves state-of-the-art results under two incompleteness settings and even outperforms standard ICL with complete labels. IJIP also supports a semi-supervised variant and can serve as a plug-and-play enhancement for existing ICL and zero-shot methods.

Abstract:
Current approaches to memory in Large Language Models (LLMs) predominantly rely on static Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which often results in scattered retrieval and fails to capture the structural dependencies required for complex reasoning. For autonomous agents, these passive and flat architectures lack the cognitive organization necessary to model the dynamic and associative nature of long-term interaction. To address this, we propose Structured Episodic Event Memory (SEEM), a hierarchical framework that synergizes a graph memory layer for relational facts with a dynamic episodic memory layer for narrative progression. Grounded in cognitive frame theory, SEEM transforms interaction streams into structured Episodic Event Frames (EEFs) anchored by precise provenance pointers. Furthermore, we introduce an agentic associative fusion and Reverse Provenance Expansion (RPE) mechanism to reconstruct coherent narrative contexts from fragmented evidence. Experimental results on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmarks demonstrate that SEEM significantly outperforms baselines, enabling agents to maintain superior narrative coherence and logical consistency.

Abstract:
Metaphor reasoning is an essential cognitive ability that maps knowledge from familiar domains to more abstract domains. This ability functions as a meta-ability underlying many types of reasoning. However, existing work rarely investigates how metaphor reasoning affects other reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we systematically study how metaphor reasoning, particularly through metaphorical riddles, can enhance broader reasoning abilities in large language models. We propose MetaR, an automated system for synthesizing metaphorical riddles that satisfy five quality dimensions: diverse, balanced, reasoning-oriented, challenging, and verifiable. Leveraging that answer categories determine riddle categories, we employ a hierarchical answer taxonomy for the former three criteria and a multi-agent refinement framework for the latter two, generating a high-quality dataset. Training with reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards using only thousands of metaphorical riddles, we demonstrate improvements across six out-of-distribution reasoning domains. Analysis reveals transfer effectiveness depends on model scale and pattern-target domain alignment. The datasets and code are publicly available at https://github.com/Abbey4799/MetaR.

Abstract:
Probing has shown that language model representations encode rich linguistic information, but it remains unclear whether they also capture cognitive signals about human processing. In this work, we probe language model representations for human reading times. Using regularized linear regression on two eye-tracking corpora spanning five languages (English, Greek, Hebrew, Russian, and Turkish), we compare the representations from every model layer against scalar predictors—surprisal, information value, and logit-lens surprisal. We find that the representations from early layers outperform surprisal in predicting early-pass measures such as first fixation and gaze duration. The concentration of predictive power in the early layers suggests that human-like processing signatures are captured by low-level structural or lexical representations, pointing to a functional alignment between model depth and the temporal stages of human reading. In contrast, for late-pass measures such as total reading time, scalar surprisal remains superior, despite its being a much more compressed representation. We also observe performance gains when using both surprisal and early-layer representations. Overall, we find that the best-performing predictor varies strongly depending on the language and eye-tracking measure.

Abstract:
Recent studies have identified "retrieval heads" in Large Language Models (LLMs) responsible for extracting information from input contexts. However, prior works largely rely on static statistics aggregated across datasets, identifying heads that perform retrieval on average. This perspective overlooks the fine-grained temporal dynamics of autoregressive generation. In this paper, we investigate retrieval heads from a dynamic perspective. Through extensive analysis, we establish three core claims: (1) Dynamism: Retrieval heads vary dynamically across timesteps; (2) Irreplaceability: Dynamic retrieval heads are specific at each timestep and cannot be effectively replaced by static retrieval heads; and (3) Correlation: The model’s hidden state encodes a predictive signal for future retrieval head patterns, indicating an internal planning mechanism. We validate these findings on the Needle-in-a-Haystack task and a multi-hop QA task, and quantify the differences on the utility of dynamic and static retrieval heads in a Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework. Our study provides new insights into the internal mechanisms of LLMs.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning for open-ended text generation is constrained by the lack of verifiable rewards, necessitating reliance on judge models that require either annotated data or powerful closed-source models. Inspired by recent work on unsupervised reinforcement learning for mathematical reasoning using confidence-based endogenous rewards, we investigate whether this principle can be adapted to open-ended writing tasks. We find that directly applying confidence rewards leads to Triviality Bias: the policy collapses toward high-probability outputs, reducing diversity and meaningful content. We propose TCER (Triviality Corrected Endogenous Reward), which addresses this bias by rewarding the relative information gain between a specialist policy and a generalist reference policy, modulated by a probability-dependent correction mechanism. Across multiple writing benchmarks and model architectures, TCER achieves consistent improvements without external supervision. Furthermore, TCER also transfers effectively to mathematical reasoning, validating the generality of our approach across different generation tasks.

Abstract:
Automatic prompt optimization is a practical alternative to fine-tuning for adapting large language models (LLMs), yet existing approaches often trade off signal quality against computational cost. Methods that rely on generative feedback can be informative but expensive to scale, while sampling-based optimization typically requires many evaluations and exhibits high variance. Even loss-driven prompt optimization remains limited by costly segment attribution that scales with prompt length and by overfitting to a single evaluator, which weakens transfer across model families and domains. We propose Gradient-guided Multi-judge Prompt Optimization (GMPO), a scalable framework that improves both efficiency and robustness. GMPO uses a first-order gradient approximation to score segment importance in a continuous masking direction, requiring only one forward and one backward pass. GMPO further employs a generate multi-judge design in which candidate prompt edits are proposed by a generator and selected using cross-entropy losses aggregated from multiple lightweight judge models, reducing evaluator bias and improving generalization. Experiments across math, reasoning, instruction-following evaluation, and safety robustness benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains with substantially lower optimization overhead.

Abstract:
Prosodic features such as pitch, timing, and intonation are central to spoken communication, conveying emotion, intent, and discourse structure. In text-based settings, where these cues are absent, emojis act as visual surrogates that add affective and pragmatic nuance. This study examines how emojis influence prosodic realisation in speech and how listeners interpret prosodic cues to recover emoji meanings. Unlike previous work, we directly link prosody and emojis by analysing human speech data collected through a controlled elicited production task. Using Bayesian multilevel modelling, we show that speakers systematically adapt their prosody based on emoji cues, and that listeners can recover intended meanings significantly above chance. Furthermore, our results reveal a clear hierarchy in prosodic shifts: greater semantic differences between emojis correspond to increased prosodic divergence. These findings suggest that emojis are meaningful carriers of prosodic intent that bridge the gap between digital text and spoken production.

Abstract:
We study leveraging adaptive retrieval to ensure sufficient “bridge” documents are retrieved for reasoning-intensive retrieval. Bridge documents are those that contribute to the reasoning process yet are not directly relevant to the initial query. While existing reasoning-based reranker pipelines attempt to surface these documents in ranking, they suffer from bounded recall. Naive solution with adaptive retrieval into these pipelines often leads to planning error propagation. To address this, we propose REPAIR, a framework that bridges this gap by repurposing reasoning plans as dense feedback signals for adaptive retrieval. Our key distinction is enabling mid-course correction during reranking through selective adaptive retrieval, retrieving documents that support the pivotal plan. Experimental results on reasoning-intensive retrieval and complex QA tasks demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines by 5.6%pt.

Abstract:
Prompt sensitivity, which refers to how strongly the output of a large language model (LLM) depends on the exact wording of its input prompt, raises concerns among users about the LLM’s stability and reliability. In this work, we consider LLMs as multivariate functions and perform a first-order Taylor expansion, thereby analyzing the relationship between meaning-preserving prompts, their gradients, and the log probabilities of the model’s next token. We derive an upper bound on the difference between log probabilities using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. We show that LLMs do not internally cluster similar inputs like smaller neural networks do, but instead disperse them. This dispersing behavior leads to an excessively high upper bound on the difference of log probabilities between two meaning-preserving prompts, making it difficult to effectively reduce to 0. In our analysis, we also show which types of meaning-preserving prompt variants are more likely to introduce prompt sensitivity risks in LLMs. In addition, we demonstrate that the upper bound is strongly correlated with an existing prompt sensitivity metric, PromptSensiScore. Moreover, by analyzing the logit variance, we find that prompt templates typically exert a greater influence on logits than the questions themselves. Overall, our results provide a general interpretation for why current LLMs can be highly sensitive to prompts with the same meaning, offering crucial evidence for understanding the prompt sensitivity of LLMs.

Abstract:
Automatic search for Multi-Agent Systems has recently emerged as a key focus in agentic AI research. Several prior approaches have relied on LLM-based free-form search over the code space. In this work, we propose a more structured framework that explores the same space through a fixed set of composable components. We show that, despite lacking the generative flexibility of LLMs during the candidate generation stage, our method outperforms prior approaches on a majority of evaluated benchmarks across two backbone LLMs and two domains: mathematics and question answering. Furthermore, our method offers additional advantages, including a more cost-efficient search process and the generation of modular, interpretable multi-agent systems.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have been applied to sequential decision-making tasks like multi-armed bandits (MAB), where an LLM is tasked with selecting arms in each iteration. However, this direct arm selection approach is often suboptimal. We propose an alternative method combining classical MAB algorithms with LLMs. Specifically, we use a classical MAB framework and leverage the in-context learning capability of LLMs for reward prediction. First, we integrate the LLM-based predictor into Thompson sampling (TS) with a decaying temperature schedule to balance exploration and exploitation. We also incorporate the predictor into a regression oracle-based MAB algorithm with explicit exploration. Additionally, we extend our TS-based algorithm to dueling bandits, where only preference feedback between arm pairs is available, requiring significant algorithmic modifications. Our empirical evaluations on synthetic MAB tasks show that our algorithms outperform LLM-based direct arm selection. In experiments on real-world text datasets, we demonstrate that, in tasks where arms lack exploitable semantic meaning, our approach delivers significantly better performance than direct arm selection.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly solve complex reasoning tasks via long chain-of-thought, but their forward-only autoregressive generation process is fragile; early token errors can cascade, which creates a clear need for self-reflection mechanisms. However, existing self-reflection either performs revisions over full drafts or learns self-correction via expensive training, both fundamentally reactive and inefficient. To address this, we propose Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time (SRGen), a lightweight test-time framework that reflects before generating at uncertain points. During token generation, SRGen utilizes dynamic entropy thresholding to identify high-uncertainty tokens. For each identified token, it trains a specific corrective vector, which fully exploits the already generated context for a self-reflective generation to correct the token probability distribution. By retrospectively analyzing the partial output, this self-reflection enables more trustworthy decisions, thereby significantly reducing the probability of errors at highly uncertain points. Evaluated on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks and a diverse set of LLMs, SRGen can significantly strengthen model reasoning. Moreover, our findings position SRGen as a plug-and-play method that integrates reflection into the generation process for reliable LLM reasoning, achieving consistent gains with bounded overhead and can be combined with other training-time (e.g., RLHF) and test-time (e.g., SLOT) techniques.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) is largely driven by scaling training compute through either pre-training with next-token prediction (NTP) or post-training with reinforcement learning (RL). The former contributes to learning broad knowledge and skills from general data, while struggling with data inefficiency and catastrophic forgetting in continual learning settings. The latter incentivizes reasoning capabilities with strong generalization, but is constrained by limited data availability due to its reliance on human annotation. To alleviate these issues, we propose Reinforcement Learning on Pre-Training data (RLPT), which combines the advantages of learning from general data and RL. In particular, RLPT derives reward signals directly from general text data through a next-segment reasoning objective, rewarding the policy for correctly predicting next text segments conditioned on the prefix text. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and models demonstrate the effectiveness of . For example, RLPT yields substantial improvements in continual pre-training ( +4.6% ) and provides a strong foundation for post-training ( +3.4% ) on Qwen3-8B-Base.

Abstract:
Process Reward Models (PRMs), which assign fine-grained scores to intermediate reasoning steps within a solution trajectory, have emerged as a promising approach to enhance the reasoning quality of Large Language Models (LLMs).However, most existing PRMs rely on a unidirectional left-to-right (L2R) evaluation scheme, which restricts their utilization of global context.In light of this challenge, we propose a novel bidirectional evaluation paradigm, named Bi directional 𝐏 rocess 𝐑 eward 𝐌 odel ( BiPRM ).BiPRM incorporates a parallel right-to-left (R2L) evaluation stream, implemented via prompt reversal, alongside the conventional L2R flow.Then a gating mechanism is introduced to adaptively fuse the reward scores from both streams to yield a holistic quality assessment.Remarkably, compared to the original PRM, BiPRM introduces only a 0.3% parameter increase for the gating module, and the parallel execution of two streams incurs merely 5% inference time latency. Our extensive empirical evaluations spanning diverse benchmarks, LLM backbones, PRM objectives and sampling policies demonstrate that BiPRM consistently surpasses unidirectional baselines, achieving an average relative gain of 10.6% over 54 solution-level configurations and 37.7% in 12 step-level error detection scenarios.Generally, our results highlight the effectiveness, robustness and general applicability of BiPRM, offering a promising new direction for process-based reward modeling.

Abstract:
Multiple-choice cloze questions are commonly used to assess linguistic proficiency and comprehension. However, generating high-quality distractors remains challenging, as existing methods often lack adaptability and control over difficulty levels, and the absence of difficulty-annotated datasets further hinders progress. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework for generating distractors with controllable difficulty by leveraging both data augmentation and a multitask learning strategy. First, to create a high-quality, difficulty-annotated dataset, we introduce a two-way distractor generation process to produce diverse and plausible distractors. These candidates are filtered and then categorized by difficulty using an ensemble QA system. Second, this newly created dataset is used to train a difficulty-controllable generation model via multitask learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our method generates high-quality distractors across difficulty levels and substantially outperforms GPT-4o in aligning distractor difficulty with human perception.

Abstract:
Autoregressive language models are trained exclusively left-to-right. We explore the complementary factorization, training right-to-left at scale, and ask what reasoning patterns emerge when a model conditions on future context to predict the past.We train LEDOM, an open-source purely reverse autoregressive language model (2B/7B parameters, 435B tokens), and find it develops capabilities distinct from forward models, including abductive inference, question synthesis, and structural handling of the reversal curse.We then explore one application of the reverse model: combining forward likelihood P(y ∣ x) with reverse posterior P(x ∣ y) through noisy channel duality. We propose Reverse Reward, which reranks forward outputs using reverse posterior estimates, and prove that bidirectional scoring penalizes hallucinated reasoning chains whose backward reconstruction degrades.Reverse Reward yields gains of up to 6.6% on AIME 2024 and 15% on AMC 2023 across multiple strong baselines. We release all codes at https://github.com/Arvid-pku/LEDOM.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have emerged as a powerful advancement in multi-step reasoning tasks, offering enhanced transparency and logical consistency through explicit chains of thought (CoT). However, these models introduce novel safety and reliability risks, such as CoT-hijacking and prompt-induced inefficiencies, which are not fully captured by existing evaluation methods. To address this gap, we propose Rt-LRM, a unified benchmark designed to assess the trustworthiness of LRMs. Rt-LRM evaluates three core dimensions: truthfulness, safety and efficiency. Beyond metric-based evaluation, we further introduce the training paradigm as a key analytical perspective to investigate the systematic impact of different training strategies on model trustworthiness. We achieve this by designing a curated suite of 30 reasoning tasks from an observational standpoint. We conduct extensive experiments on 26 models and identify several valuable insights into the trustworthiness of LRMs. For example, LRMs generally face trustworthiness challenges and tend to be more fragile than Large Language Models (LLMs) when encountering reasoning-induced risks. These findings uncover previously underexplored vulnerabilities and highlight the need for more targeted evaluations. In addition, we release a scalable toolbox for standardized trustworthiness research to support future advancements in this important field.

Abstract:
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods introduce a small number of training parameters, enabling pre-trained models to adapt rapidly to new data distributions. While these methods have shown promising results, they exhibit notable limitations. First, most existing methods operate in the signal space domain, which results in substantial information redundancy. Second, most existing methods utilize fixed prompts or adaptation layers, failing to fully account for the multi-scale characteristics of signals. To address these challenges, we propose the Multi-Scale Freq uency Adapter (FreqAdapter), which integrates textual information and performs multi-scale fine-tuning of visual signal in the frequency domain. Additionally, we introduce a multi-scale adaptation strategy to optimize receptive fields across different frequency ranges, further enhancing the model’s representational capacity. Extensive experiments on multimodal models, including CLIP and LLaVA, demonstrate that FreqAdapter significantly improves both performance and efficiency. FreqAdapter improves performance with minimal cost and fast convergence within one epoch.

Abstract:
Debate has emerged as a promising oversight mechanism for Large Language Models (LLMs) amid rising systemic complexity, particularly where models outperform human evaluators. Yet, Debate provides little verifiable evidence for its final judgments, and its scalability remains largely unexplored. To make oversight grounded and scale as capabilities extend, we introduce an Agentic Oversight framework. By using Dialectic Argumentation as a reasoning function, we extend this paradigm to multilingual and multimodal spaces. We employ a weak-to-strong oversight approach based on two expert models that evaluate and defend contesting answers, while a third blind judge determines the winner using Dialectic Argumentation. Experts argue only for belief-consistent answers, founding the Debate on disagreements. We experimented with six tasks on our framework in both multilingual and multimodal scenarios, and dialectic argumentation consistently outperforms single-expert baselines. Moreover, we show that dialectic judgements from a weaker model deliver argument-mediated supervision that, via fine-tuning, instils unsupervised reasoning signals in expert models.

Abstract:
Speculative Decoding has emerged as a popular technique for accelerating inference in Large Language Models. However, most existing approaches yield only modest improvements in production serving systems. Methods that achieve substantial speedups typically rely on an additional trained draft model or auxiliary model components, increasing deployment and maintenance complexity. This added complexity reduces flexibility, particularly when serving workloads shift to tasks, domains, or languages that are not well represented in the draft model’s training data.We introduce Simply-Scalable Speculative Decoding (SSSD), a training-free method that combines lightweight n-gram matching with hardware-aware speculation. Relative to standard autoregressive decoding, SSSD reduces latency by up to 2.9×. It achieves performance on par with leading training-based approaches across a broad range of benchmarks, while requiring substantially lower adoption effort—no data preparation, training or tuning are needed—and exhibiting superior robustness under language and domain shift, as well as in long-context settings.

Abstract:
Post-training quantization has emerged as a widely adopted technique for compressing and accelerating the inference of Large Language Models (LLMs). The primary challenges in LLMs quantization stem from activation outliers, which significantly degrade model performance especially at lower bit precision. While recent approaches attempt to mitigate outliers through linear transformations across feature dimensions, our analysis reveals that the transformed weights and activations still exhibit persistent outlier patterns with concentrated magnitude distributions. In this paper, we first model the mathematical relationship between quantization error and outliers, and then introduce a new metric Flatness to quantify the distribution of outliers. Based on this, we derive the theoretical optimal solution with respect to Flatness. Building on these insights, we propose Bidirectional Diagonal Quantization (BDQ), a novel post-training quantization framework that effectively disperses outlier patterns through optimized matrix transformations. BDQ strategically distributes outlier magnitudes across matrix dimensions via learned diagonal operations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BDQ establishes a new quantization benchmark. It achieves less than 1% accuracy drop in W4A4 quantization on the LLaMA-3-8B model. In the more challenging W2A4KV16 experiment, compared to state-of-the-art approaches, BDQ reduces the performance gap by 39.1% on the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-LLaMA-70B model.

Abstract:
The advent of always-on personal AI assistants, enabled by all-day wearable devices such as smart glasses, demands a new level of contextual understanding—one that goes beyond short, isolated events to encompass the continuous, longitudinal stream of egocentric video. Achieving this vision requires advances in long-horizon video understanding, where systems must interpret and recall visual and audio information spanning days or even weeks. Existing methods, including large language models and retrieval-augmented generation, are constrained by limited context windows and lack the ability to perform compositional, multi-hop reasoning over very long video streams. In this work, we address these challenges through EGAgent, an enhanced agentic framework centered on entity scene graphs, which represent people, places, objects, and their relationships over time. Our system equips a planning agent with tools for structured search and reasoning over these graphs, as well as hybrid visual and audio search capabilities, enabling detailed, cross-modal, and temporally coherent reasoning. Experiments on the EgoLifeQA and Video-MME-long datasets show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on EgoLifeQA (57.5%) and competitive performance on Video-MME-long (74.1%) for complex longitudinal video understanding tasks.

Abstract:
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) show promise on complex tasks but remain prone to coordination failures such as goal drift, error cascades, and misaligned behaviors. We propose Explicit Trait Inference (ETI), a psychologically grounded method for improving coordination. ETI enables agents to infer and track partner characteristics along two established psychological dimensions—warmth (e.g., trust) and competence (e.g., skill)—from interaction histories to guide decisions. We evaluate ETI in controlled settings (economic games), where it reduces payoff loss by 45–77%, and in more realistic, complex multi-agent settings (MultiAgentBench), where it improves performance by 3–29% depending on the scenario and model, relative to a CoT baseline. Additional analysis shows that gains are closely linked to trait inference: ETI profiles predict agents’ actions, and informative profiles drive improvements. These results highlight ETI as a lightweight and robust mechanism for improving coordination in diverse multi-agent settings, and provide the first systematic evidence that LLM agents can (i) reliably infer others’ traits from interaction histories and (ii) leverage structured awareness of others’ traits for coordination.

Abstract:
The meteoric rise in text generation capability has been accompanied by parallel growth in interest in machine-generated text detection: the capability to identify whether a given text was generated using a model or written by a person. While detection models show strong performance, they have the capacity to cause significant negative impacts. We explore potential biases in English machine-generated text detection systems. We curate a dataset of student essays and assess 16 different detection systems for bias across four attributes: gender, race/ethnicity, English-language learner (ELL) status, and economic status. We evaluate these attributes using regression-based models to determine the significance and power of the effects, as well as performing subgroup analysis. We find that while biases are generally inconsistent across systems, there are several key issues: several models tend to classify disadvantaged groups as machine-generated, ELL essays are more likely to be classified as machine-generated, economically disadvantaged students’ essays are less likely to be classified as machine-generated, and non-White ELL essays are disproportionately classified as machine-generated relative to their White counterparts. Finally, we perform human annotation and find that while humans perform generally poorly at the detection task, they show no significant biases on the studied attributes.

Abstract:
Mitigating the detrimental effects of noisy labels on the training process has become increasingly critical, as obtaining entirely clean or human-annotated samples for large-scale pre-training tasks is often impractical. Nonetheless, existing noise mitigation methods often encounter limitations in practical applications due to their task-specific design, model dependency, and significant computational overhead. In this work, we exploit the properties of high-dimensional orthogonality to identify a robust and effective boundary in cone space for separating clean and noisy samples. Building on this, we propose One-Step Anti-noise (OSA), a model-agnostic noisy label mitigation paradigm that employs an estimator model and a scoring function to assess the noise level of input pairs through just one-step inference. We empirically validate the superiority of OSA, demonstrating its enhanced training robustness, improved task transferability, streamlined deployment, and reduced computational overhead across diverse benchmarks, models, and tasks. Our code is released at https://github.com/leolee99/OSA.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs), especially for knowledge-intensive tasks. Despite its advantages, current RAG methods often struggle to fully exploit knowledge during generation. In particular, the synergy between the model’s internal parametric knowledge and external retrieved knowledge remains limited. Retrieved contents may sometimes mislead generation, while certain generated content can guide the model toward more accurate outputs. In this work, we propose Collaborative Chain-of-Agents, a framework designed to enhance explicitly synergy over both parametric and retrieved knowledge. Specifically, we first introduce CoCoA-zero, a multi-agent RAG framework that first performs conditional knowledge induction and then reasons answers. Building on this, we develop CoCoA, a long-chain training strategy that synthesizes extended multi-agent reasoning trajectories from CoCoA-zero to fine-tune the LLM. This strategy enhances the model’s capability to explicitly integrate and jointly leverage parametric and retrieved knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of CoCoA in open-domain QA and multi-hop QA.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across diverse domains but remain difficult to deploy in resource-constrained environments due to their size. Low-rank compression is a common remedy, typically minimizing weight reconstruction error under the assumption that weights are low-rank. However, this assumption often does not hold in LLMs. In contrast, LLM activations exhibit a more pronounced low-rank structure, motivating approaches that minimize activation reconstruction error.This shift alone, however, is not sufficient: different activation dimensions contribute unequally to model performance, and treating them uniformly can lead to accuracy loss. We introduce IMPACT, an importance-aware activation reconstruction framework that links compression to its effect on model performance. IMPACT formulates compression as an optimization problem that integrates activation structure with gradient-based importance, deriving a closed-form solution where reconstruction bases arise from an importance-weighted activation covariance matrix. This yields low-rank compression explicitly optimized for accuracy preservation. Experiments across multiple models and tasks demonstrate that IMPACT achieves up to 55.4% greater model size reduction while maintaining accuracy comparable to or better than state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as an important means of enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in knowledge-intensive tasks. However, most existing RAG strategies treat retrieved passages in a flat and unstructured way, which prevents the model from capturing structural cues and constrains its ability to synthesize knowledge from dispersed evidence across documents. To overcome these limitations, we propose Disco-RAG, a discourse-aware framework that explicitly injects discourse signals into the generation process. Our method constructs intra-chunk discourse trees to capture local hierarchies and builds inter-chunk rhetorical graphs to model cross-passage coherence. These structures are jointly integrated into a planning blueprint that conditions the generation. Experiments on question answering and long-document summarization benchmarks show the efficacy of our approach. Disco-RAG achieves state-of-the-art results on the benchmarks without fine-tuning. These findings underscore the important role of discourse structure in advancing RAG systems.

Abstract:
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in generalized robotic control; however, they remain notoriously brittle to linguistic perturbations. We identify a critical "modality collapse” phenomenon where strong visual priors overwhelm sparse linguistic signals, causing agents to overfit to specific instruction phrasings while ignoring the underlying semantic intent. To address this, we propose Residual Semantic Steering (RSS), a probabilistic framework that disentangles physical affordance from semantic execution. RSS introduces two theoretical innovations: (1) Monte Carlo Syntactic Integration, which approximates the true semantic posterior via dense, LLM-driven distributional expansion, and (2) Residual Affordance Steering, a dual-stream decoding mechanism that explicitly isolates the causal influence of language by subtracting the visual affordance prior. Theoretical analysis suggests that RSS effectively maximizes the mutual information between action and intent while suppressing visual distractors. Empirical results across diverse manipulation benchmarks demonstrate that RSS achieves state-of-the-art robustness, maintaining performance even under adversarial linguistic perturbations.

Abstract:
Instruction tuning relies on large instruction–response corpora whose quality and composition strongly affect downstream performance. We propose A nswer D ivergence- G uided Selection (ADG) , which selects instruction data based on the geometric structure of multi-sample outputs. ADG draws several high-temperature generations per instruction, maps responses into an embedding space, and computes an output divergence score that jointly encodes dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy. High scores correspond to instructions whose answers are both far apart and multi-modal, rather than clustered paraphrases along a single direction. Across two backbones and three public instruction pools, fine-tuning on only 10K ADG-selected examples consistently outperforms strong selectors on six benchmarks spanning reasoning, knowledge, and coding. Analyses further show that both dispersion magnitude and shape anisotropy are necessary, supporting answer divergence as a practical signal for instruction data selection. Code and appendix are included in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Temporal language does more than place events on a timeline. In news discourse, references to the past, present, and future can function as rhetorical devices that shape interpretation and persuasion. Here, we study temporal framing , defined as the persuasive use of time-related language to structure meaning rather than to report chronology. We propose a taxonomy of eight temporal frames grounded in prior work on temporality and framing, and we realize it through expert annotation of a multilingual news corpus. The resulting dataset includes 458 English and German news articles, with over 2K temporally framed sentences and approximately 3K temporal framing annotations identified from a corpus of more than 20K sentences. We analyze frame prevalence, co-occurrence patterns, and lexical cues, and evaluate temporal framing detection using supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot classification. Our experiments show that temporal framing is learnable at the sentence level, with supervised models substantially outperforming zero-shot approaches. We publicly release the corpus to support future research on temporal framing: https://mbzuai-nlp.github.io/temporal-framing/.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced the reasoning ability of vision-language models (VLMs). However, the inherent text-dominated nature of VLMs often leads to insufficient visual faithfulness, characterized by sparse attention activation to visual tokens. More importantly, our empirical analysis reveals that temporal visual forgetting along reasoning steps exacerbates this deficiency. To bridge this gap, we propose Visually-Guided Policy Optimization (VGPO), a novel framework to reinforce visual focus during policy optimization. Specifically, VGPO initially introduces a Visual Attention Compensation mechanism that leverages visual similarity to localize and amplify visual cues, while progressively elevating visual expectations in later steps to counteract visual forgetting. Building on this mechanism, we implement a dual-grained advantage re-weighting strategy: the intra-trajectory level highlights tokens exhibiting relatively high visual activation, while the inter-trajectory level prioritizes trajectories demonstrating superior visual accumulation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VGPO achieves better visual activation and superior performance in mathematical multimodal reasoning and visual-dependent tasks. The code has been released at https://github.com/wzb-bupt/VGPO.

Abstract:
Model merging, typically on Instruct and Thinking models, has shown remarkable performance for efficient reasoning. In this paper, we systematically revisit the simplest merging method that interpolates two weights directly. Particularly, we observe that model interpolation follows a three-stage evolutionary paradigm with distinct behaviors on the reasoning trajectory. These dynamics provide a principled guide for navigating the performance-cost trade-off. Empirical results demonstrate that a strategically interpolated model surprisingly surpasses sophisticated model merging baselines on both efficiency and effectiveness. We further validate our findings with extensive ablation studies on model layers, modules, and decoding strategies. Ultimately, this work demystifies model interpolation and offers a practical framework for crafting models with precisely targeted reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
While critical for alignment, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) incurs the risk of catastrophic forgetting, yet the layer-wise emergence of instruction-following capabilities remains elusive. We investigate this mechanism via a comprehensive analysis utilizing information-theoretic, geometric, and optimization metrics across model scales (1B-32B). Our experiments reveal a distinct depth-dependent pattern: middle layers (20%-80%) are stable, whereas final layers exhibit high sensitivity. Leveraging this insight, we propose Mid-Block Efficient Tuning, which selectively updates these critical intermediate layers. Empirically, our method outperforms standard LoRA up to 10.2% on GSM8K (OLMo2-7B) with reduced parameter overhead, demonstrating that effective alignment is architecturally localized rather than distributed. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/lshowway/base.

Abstract:
Automatic soccer commentary generation aims to bridge the gap between raw visual content and professional, tactical commentary. However, existing datasets tend to produce incomplete commentary that lacks semantic richness and fails to convey the full visual information present in standard video clips. To address these limitations, we propose two manually curated datasets: SN-Short, which enhances scene-level semantic descriptions, and SN-Long, which captures event continuity for context-aware commentary.Based on these, we design a commentary augmentation pipeline that transforms incomplete annotations into MatchText, a semantically complete and structurally standardized dataset. Leveraging this supervision, we introduce MatchAware, a generation model that incorporates contextual cues from previous events to produce coherent commentary aligned with the visual flow of the game. Experimental results show that proposed approach significantly outperforms existing baselines on the constructed datasets.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are often modified after release through post-processing such as post-training or quantization, which makes it challenging to determine whether one model is derived from another. Existing provenance detection methods have two main limitations: (1) they embed signals into the base model before release, which is infeasible for already published models, or (2) they compare outputs across models using hand-crafted or random prompts, which are not robust to post-processing. In this work, we propose LLMPrint, a novel detection framework that constructs fingerprints by exploiting LLMs’ inherent vulnerability to prompt injection. Our key insight is that by optimizing fingerprint prompts to enforce consistent token preferences, we can obtain fingerprints that are both unique to the base model and robust to post-processing. We further develop a unified verification procedure that applies to both gray-box and black-box settings, with statistical guarantees. We evaluate LLMPrint on five base models and around 700 post-trained or quantized variants. Our results show that LLMPrint achieves high true positive rates while keeping false positive rates near zero. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/hifi-hyp/ACL-LLMPrint.

Abstract:
Scientific writing is an expert-domain task that demands deep domain knowledge, task-specific requirements and reasoning capabilities that leverage the domain knowledge to satisfy the task specifications. While scientific text generation has been widely studied, its evaluation remains a challenging and open problem. It is critical to develop models that can be reliably deployed for evaluating diverse open-ended scientific writing tasks while adhering to their distinct requirements. However, existing LLM-based judges and reward models are primarily optimized for general-purpose benchmarks with fixed scoring rubrics and evaluation criteria. Consequently, they often fail to reason over sparse knowledge of scientific domains when interpreting task-dependent and multi-faceted criteria. Moreover, fine-tuning for each individual task is costly and impractical for low-resource settings. To bridge these gaps, we propose cost-efficient, open-source reward models tailored for scientific writing evaluation. We introduce a two-stage training framework that initially optimizes scientific evaluation preferences and then refines reasoning capabilities. Our multi-aspect evaluation design and joint training across diverse tasks enable fine-grained assessment and robustness to dynamic criteria and scoring rubrics. Experimental analysis shows that our training regime strongly improves LLM-based scientific writing evaluation. Our models generalize effectively across tasks and to previously unseen scientific writing evaluation settings, allowing a single trained evaluator to be reused without task-specific retraining.

Abstract:
Pragmatic inference is inherently graded. Different lexical items give rise to pragmatic enrichment to different degrees. Scalar implicature exemplifies this property through scalar diversity, where implicature strength varies across scalar items. However, evaluations of pragmatic inference in large language models (LLMs) often rely on prompt-based manipulations. Beyond prompt-level effects, this study introduces Continuous Interpretive Steering (CIS), a method that probes graded pragmatic interpretation by treating activation-level steering strength as a continuous experimental variable. To support this analysis, this study introduces a new dataset, GraSD, which encodes graded scalar diversity. Experiments on four LLMs show that uniform activation steering increases pragmatic interpretations globally but collapses item-level variation, whereas graded activation steering yields differentiated interpretive shifts aligned with scalar diversity grades. Together, CIS and GraSD provide a principled framework for evaluating graded pragmatic sensitivity in LLMs.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) improve, many applications are moving from a single LLM call to multi-agent systems. These systems often rely on either hand-designed or automatically optimized workflows with multiple verification and testing steps. While those extra steps can improve accuracy, they also increase latency and token costs. In practice, many queries do not need such heavy processing and can be handled well by a single strong agent.To address this inefficiency, we propose LLM-as-Scheduler (LAS), a system that dynamically chooses the right workflow for each query. LAS uses a two-stage cascade: first, a lightweight gate quickly evaluates each agent’s output; then, an LLM-based scheduler uses query features and gate signals to make more detailed routing decisions. Experiments show that LAS cuts token usage by 43% and reduces end-to-end latency by more than 36%, while causing at most a 1.4 percentage-point drop in accuracy compared with a strong fixed workflow.

Abstract:
Language is a process that changes over time as new vocabulary emerges, word meanings shift, and narratives progress. Despite this fact, most Large Language Models are trained on corpora that lack explicit temporal information, which inhibits their ability to model the language process. In this work, we introduce the Temporal Language Model 1 (TLM-1), a BERT style transformer encoder that models that language process by jointly learning to predict document contents and classify document publication dates. We also introduce a Bayesian framework for querying TLM-1 that disentangles its temporal dynamics from several sources of anachronism. Using this query framework, we demonstrate that TLM-1 effectively surfaces several sociolinguistic trends in contemporary American English and accurately detects semantic changes in word meanings. Furthermore, we perform a mechanistic analysis of TLM-1’s time token embeddings, and find that they learn a curve whose geometry recovers the ordinal progression of time. We take the existence of this curve as evidence that TLM-1 is effectively learning to reconstruct temporal language dynamics.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can both evaluate and explain text quality; however, most existing evaluators operate as static classifiers and lack the ability to refine their reasoning through interaction. We propose an Iterative Alpha–Beta Learning framework that jointly trains two complementary 8B models: an Alpha ( 𝛼 ) classifier that assesses pairwise story engagement, and a Beta ( 𝛽 ) generator that produces structured, rubric-guided comparative explanations. The two models co-evolve within a closed feedback loop: 𝛼 provides probabilistic preference signals to guide 𝛽 ’s Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), while 𝛽 ’s improved explanations are reintegrated to retrain 𝛼 via a KL-based contrastive objective. This dual optimization enables mutual learning: 𝛼 gains interpretability and robustness from 𝛽 ’s textual rationales, while 𝛽 acquires stronger alignment and discriminative precision from 𝛼 ’s confidence deltas. Experiments on human-annotated story-pair datasets HANNA show that the proposed system consistently outperforms strong single-model baselines in both accuracy and explanation quality across multiple iterative rounds.

Abstract:
Contemporary automated scientific discovery has focused on agents for generating scientific experiments, while systems that perform higher-level scientific activities such as theory building remain underexplored. In this work, we formulate the problem of synthesizing theories consisting of qualitative and quantitative laws from large corpora of scientific literature. We study theory generation at scale, using 13.7k source papers to synthesize 2.9k theories, examining how generation using literature-grounding versus parametric knowledge, and accuracy-focused versus novelty-focused generation objectives change theory properties. Our experiments show that, compared to using parametric LLM memory for generation, our literature-supported method creates theories that are significantly better at both matching existing evidence and at predicting future results from 4.6k subsequently-written papers.

Abstract:
Static concreteness ratings are widely used in NLP, yet a word’s concreteness can shift with context, especially in figurative language such as metaphor, where common concrete nouns can take abstract interpretations. While such shifts are evident from context, it remains unclear how LLMs understand concreteness internally. We conduct a layer-wise and geometric analysis of LLM hidden representations across four model families, examining how models distinguish literal vs. figurative uses of the same noun and how concreteness is organized in representation space. We find that LLMs separate literal and figurative usage in early layers, and that mid-to-late layers compress concreteness into a one-dimensional direction that is consistent across models. Finally, we show this geometric structure is practically useful: a single concreteness direction supports efficient figurative-language classification and enables training-free steering of generation toward more literal or more figurative rewrites.

Abstract:
Hallucinations in machine translation (MT)—outputs that may be fluent yet unfaithful to the source content—remain a critical obstacle. They hinder the reliable deployment of MT systems in real-world applications. Despite growing attention to this phenomenon, progress has been constrained by the lack of large-scale, high-quality benchmarks dedicated to hallucination detection. We introduce HAT (Hallucination Annotation for Translation), a novel dataset designed to advance research on this problem. HAT comprises 350,959 span-level annotated samples across 38 language pairs, with approximately 8,000–10,000 samples per pair partitioned into training, development, and test sets. Annotations were produced by professional translators under rigorous quality control protocols to ensure reliability. We provide a detailed analysis of hallucination distributions and establish benchmark performance using a diverse set of baselines, including automatic MT evaluation metrics as well as large language models. By providing the first large-scale, systematically annotated resource for hallucination detection in MT, HAT enables the development of more faithful translation models and lays the groundwork for future research on building trustworthy machine translation systems.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become indispensable assistants, they remain vulnerable to misuse. Jailbreaking is an essential adversarial technique for red-teaming models to uncover and patch security flaws. However, existing jailbreak methods suffer from significant limitations. Token-level jailbreak attacks often produce incoherent or unreadable inputs and exhibit poor transferability, while prompt-level attacks lack scalability and rely heavily on manual effort and human ingenuity. We propose AGILE, a concise and effective two-stage framework that combines the advantages of these approaches. The first stage performs a one-shot, scenario-based generation of context and rephrases the original malicious query to obscure its harmful intent. The second stage utilizes information from the model’s hidden states to guide fine-grained edits, effectively steering the model’s internal representation of the input from a malicious one toward a benign one. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AGILE achieves state-of-the-art Attack Success Rate, with gains of up to 37.74% over the strongest baseline, and AGILE exhibits excellent transferability to black-box and large-scale models. Our code is available at https://github.com/SELGroup/AGILE.

Abstract:
Statement autoformalization, a crucial first step in formal verification, aims to transform informal descriptions of math problems into machine-verifiable formal representations but remains a significant challenge. The core difficulty lies in the fact that existing language models hallucinate formal dependencies, including missing or incorrect definitions, lemmas, and theorems. Current dependency retrieval approaches exhibit poor precision and recall, and lack the scalability to leverage ever-growing public datasets. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel retrieval-augmented framework based on Direct Dependency Retrieval (DDR). DDR directly generates candidate formal dependencies from natural-language mathematical descriptions and verifies their existence in the formal library via an efficient Suffix Array Check (SAC). Built on a SAC-constructed dependency retrieval dataset of over 500,000 samples, a high-precision DDR model is fine-tuned and shown to significantly outperform state-of-the-art methods in both retrieval precision and recall, leading to superior advantage in the autoformalization tasks. SAC also contributes in assessing formalization difficulty and enabling explicit quantification of the hallucination in In-Context Learning (ICL).

Abstract:
Reasoning and planning critically rely on a predictive dynamics model. In symbolic domains such as mathematics and code, large language models (LLMs) internalize transition rules during pretraining, allowing reinforcement learning or test-time scaling to effectively elicit and generalize their reasoning ability. Embodied decision making is fundamentally different: agents must reason from sparse visual evidence under partial observability, while coping with environment-specific dynamics and affordances not captured by language priors. Here we propose IMPLEMENT, a model-based reasoning framework that enables frozen LLMs to perform imaginative planning. A lightweight world model converts raw pixels into object-centric symbolic states amenable to language-based reasoning, and predicts their evolution under hypothetical actions. To address partial observability, we perform Monte Carlo state prediction via temperature sampling, enabling decision evaluation over multiple plausible futures. To support adaptation to unseen environments, we integrate Meta In-Context Learning, conditioning the world model on interaction history to continuously refine its predictions. At inference time, the LLM and world model form a tight co-reasoning loop: the LLM proposes candidate actions, the world model simulates future trajectories, and the LLM refines its decisions, effectively inducing an online policy iteration scheme. Extensive experiments in ALFWorld demonstrate consistent advantages over finetuning-based and strong test-time scaling approaches, validating IMPLEMENT as an effective framework for grounding language agents in visual embodied environments.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated significant potential in enhancing large language models (LLMs) by supplementing external knowledge. However, existing approaches focus primarily on retrieving isolated factual knowledge entities while neglecting the critical reasoning relationships. To address this limitation, Graph-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) has emerged as an effective solution, which explicitly integrates structured knowledge graphs to support complex reasoning tasks. Although diverse graph construction methods have been explored, they typically rely on static, query-agnostic graphs constructed via fixed heuristics. We are thereby motivated to propose a query-centric retrieval framework that adaptively constructs a graph tailored to each query. However, it is challenging to accurately identify these latent relationships from queries to the corpus. Moreover, unifying multiple local-perspective connections into a globally coherent structured corpus introduces additional complexity. To this end, we introduce HyperRAG, a novel framework in the Hyperbolic space that captures both explicit entity-based links and implicit query-aware connections. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that HyperRAG consistently outperforms existing baselines.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has enabled them to communicate their confidence in natural language, improving transparency and reliability.However, this expressiveness is often accompanied by systematic overconfidence, whose underlying causes remain poorly understood. In this work, we analyze the dynamics of verbalized confidence estimation and identify answer-independence-the failure to condition confidence on the model’s own answer-as a primary driver of this behavior.To address this, we introduce ADVICE (Answer-Dependent VerbalIzed Confidence Estimation), a fine-tuning framework that promotes answer-grounded confidence estimation.Extensive experiments show that ADVICE substantially improves confidence calibration, while exhibiting strong generalization to unseen settings without degrading task performance.We further demonstrate that these gains stem from enhanced answer dependence, shedding light on the origins of overconfidence and enabling trustworthy confidence verbalization.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) that generate long chains of thought now perform well on multi-step math, science, and coding tasks. However, their behavior is still unstable and hard to interpret, and existing analysis tools struggle with such long, structured reasoning traces. We introduce Step-Saliency, which pools attention–gradient scores into step-to-step maps along the question–thinking–summary trajectory. Across several models, Step-Saliency reveals two recurring information-flow failures: Shallow Lock-in, where shallow layers over-focus on the current step and barely use earlier context, and Deep Decay, where deep layers gradually lose saliency on the thinking segment and the summary increasingly attends to itself and the last few steps. Motivated by these patterns, we propose StepFlow, a saliency-inspired test-time intervention that adjusts shallow saliency patterns measured by Step-Saliency via Odds-Equal Bridge and adds a small step-level residual in deep layers via Step Momentum Injection. StepFlow improves accuracy on math, science, and coding tasks across multiple LRMs without retraining, indicating that repairing information flow can recover part of their missing reasoning performance.

Abstract:
As LLMs rapidly advance and enter real-world use, their privacy implications are increasingly important. We study an authorship de-anonymization threat: using LLMs to link anonymous documents to their authors, potentially compromising settings such as double-blind peer review. We propose De-Anonymization at Scale (DAS), a large-language-model–based method for attributing authorship among tens of thousands of candidate texts. DAS uses a sequential progression strategy: it randomly partitions the candidate corpus into fixed-size groups, prompts an LLM to select the text most likely written by the same author as a query text, and iteratively re-queries the surviving candidates to produce a ranked top-k list. To make this practical at scale, DAS adds a dense-retrieval prefilter to shrink the search space and a majority-voting–style aggregation over multiple independent runs to improve robustness and ranking precision. Experiments on anonymized review data show DAS can recover same-author texts from pools of tens of thousands with accuracy well above chance, demonstrating a realistic privacy risk for anonymous platforms. On standard authorship benchmarks (Enron emails and blog posts), DAS also improves both accuracy and scalability over prior approaches, highlighting a new LLM-enabled de-anonymization vulnerability.

Abstract:
Enzyme–reaction retrieval is a fundamental problem in computational biology, underpinning enzyme characterization, reaction mechanism elucidation, and the rational design of metabolic pathways and biocatalysts. As a bidirectional task, it entails both enzyme-to-reaction and reaction-to-enzyme mapping. However, existing approaches suffer from poor generalization across tasks and distributions, with performance highly sensitive to dataset splits and substantial asymmetry between retrieval directions. To address these challenges, we present TIGER, a Text-Informed Generalized Enzyme-Reaction Retrieval framework that leverages protein-to-text generation models to distill textual semantic knowledge from enzyme sequences, providing a generalized representation that bridges enzymes and biochemical reactions. To ensure the quality and reliability of textual semantics, we design a Dynamic Gating Network that adaptively fuses text-derived knowledge with sequence features, enabling more consistent and informative enzyme representations, while a Structure-Shared Feature Projector aligns enzyme and reaction representations within a unified latent space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, under bidirectional retrieval supervision, TIGER significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across diverse distributions and exhibits strong robustness and transferability across tasks.

Abstract:
Automated interlinear gloss prediction with neural networks is a promising approach to accelerate language documentation efforts. However, while state-of-the-art models like GlossLM (Ginn et al., 2024) achieve high scores on glossing benchmarks, user studies with linguists have found critical barriers to the usefulness of such models in real-world scenarios (Rice et al., 2025). In particular, existing models typically generate morpheme-level glosses but assign them to whole words without predicting the actual morpheme boundaries, making the predictions less interpretable and thus untrustworthy to human annotators.We conduct the first study on neural models that jointly predict interlinear glosses and the corresponding morphological segmentation from raw text. We run experiments to determine the optimal way to train models that balance segmentation and glossing accuracy, as well as the alignment between the two tasks. We extend the training corpus of GlossLM and pretrain PolyGloss, a family of seq2seq multilingual models for joint segmentation and glossing that outperforms GlossLM on glossing and beats various open-source LLMs on segmentation, glossing, and alignment. In addition, we demonstrate that PolyGloss can be quickly adapted to a new dataset via low-rank adaptation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit powerful capabilities but inevitably memorize sensitive information, raising privacy, copyright, and safety concerns. Existing LLM unlearning methods typically rely on updating model parameters. While effective, they are often limited in real-world scenarios: fine-tuning large-scale models is costly, may introduce potential irreversible risks, and depends on both forget and retain datasets, which are often difficult to obtain in full. To address these challenges, an ideal solution is to achieve unlearning at inference time. To this end, we propose SEGUE, a training-free, plug-and-play inference-time unlearning strategy. SEGUE employs a probe to detect queries involving forgettable concepts and applies entropy-guided decoding to suppress target knowledge, enabling controllable non-factual generation while preserving overall model capabilities. Experiments on the MUSE, RWKU, and WMDP datasets, covering copyright, entity, and potential-risk knowledge, show that SEGUE effectively balances sensitive knowledge suppression and generation quality, outperforming existing most inference-time unlearning methods.

Abstract:
We investigate belief-like representations in decoder-only autoregressive LLMs using linear controlled probes on residual stream activations and single attention heads. Following Herrmann and Levinstein’s (2025) criteria (Accuracy, Use, Coherence, and Uniformity) we find that large models exhibit strong truth sensitivity (Accuracy), and steering activations along probe directions reliably changes downstream behavior (Use). Coherence, measured via calibrated probes and cross-dataset probing, is moderate across models, while training on diverse data yields domain-consistent truth directions (Uniformity). The results are particularly encouraging at the head level and align with some standard philosophical accounts of belief, e.g., minimal functionalism, supporting the view that LLMs can maintain propositional attitudes under such theoretical frameworks.

Abstract:
Recent large language models support inputs of up to 10 million tokens, yet they perform poorly on long-context tasks that require complex reasoning. Such tasks can be solved using only a subset of the input — a proxy context — rather than the full sequence. Despite sharing the same underlying reasoning process, models exhibit a significant performance disparity between proxy and full contexts. To improve long-context reasoning, we propose ProxyCoT, a novel training framework that transfers reasoning capabilities from short proxy contexts to full long contexts. Specifically, we first obtain high-quality chain-of-thought reasoning traces on proxy contexts through reinforcement learning or distillation from a larger teacher model, and then ground the generated traces in full long contexts with supervised fine-tuning. Experiments across different datasets demonstrate that ProxyCoT consistently outperforms strong baselines with reduced computational overhead. Furthermore, models trained with ProxyCoT generalize their long-context reasoning capabilities to out-of-domain tasks.

Abstract:
KV cache compression promises increased throughput and efficiency with negligible loss in performance. While the gains in throughput are indisputable and recent literature has indeed shown minimal degradation on particular benchmarks, in general the consequences of compression in realistic scenarios such as multi-instruction prompting have been insufficiently studied. In this paper, we identify several pitfalls that practitioners should be aware of when deploying KV cache compressed LLMs. We evaluate five KV cache compression methods (StreamingLLM, SnapKV, TOVA, H2O, and K-Norm) on Llama3.1 8B and Qwen2.5 14B under multi-instruction prompting with IFEval. Importantly, we show that certain instructions degrade much more rapidly with compression, effectively causing them to be completely ignored by the LLM. As a practical example, we highlight system prompt leakage as a case study, empirically demonstrating the impact of compression on leakage and general instruction-following. We identify several factors that contribute to system prompt leakage: compression method, instruction order, and KV eviction bias. We then propose simple changes to KV cache eviction policies that can reduce the impact of these factors and improve the overall performance in multi-instruction tasks.

Abstract:
Existing user simulators based on prompting to role-play or SFT are generally confined to imitating users’ textual utterances, without adequately considering the multi-faceted cognitive processes that underlie human decision-making during interactions. To facilitate better alignment with real human thinking patterns, we construct the LMSYS-UserThinking dataset, in which we augment 51k human–LLM conversations by reconstructing the user’s inner reasoning both during and at the end of each dialogue. Furthermore, to enhance controllability and situational coherence, we introduce scenario settings that describe the global context and user goals throughout multi-turn conversations. Using this dataset, we train user simulators called ThinkingUS on different base models. We evaluate our approach from both offline and online user simulation perspectives, ultimately demonstrating its effectiveness.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) have reached human-like fluency and coherence, distinguishing machine-generated text (MGT) from human-written content becomes increasingly difficult. While early efforts in MGT detection have focused on binary classification, the growing landscape and diversity of LLMs require a more fine-grained yet challenging authorship attribution (AA), i.e., being able to identify the precise generator (LLM or human) behind a text. However, AA remains nowadays confined to a monolingual setting, with English being the most investigated one, overlooking the multilingual nature and usage of modern LLMs. In this work, we introduce the problem of Multilingual Authorship Attribution, which involves attributing texts to human or multiple LLM generators across diverse languages. Focusing on 18 languages—covering multiple families and writing scripts—and 8 generators (7 LLMs and the human-authored class), we investigate the multilingual suitability of monolingual AA methods in terms of their cross-lingual transferability, and the impact of generators on attribution performance. Our results reveal that while certain monolingual AA methods can be adapted to multilingual settings, significant limitations and challenges remain, particularly in transferring across diverse language families, underscoring the complexity of multilingual AA and the need for more robust approaches to better match real-world scenarios.

Abstract:
Causal explanations in political narratives are often framed and contested. Different sources may explain the same event by assigning responsibility to different actors and expressing varying levels of certainty. Standard Event Causality Identification (ECI) focuses on detecting causal links and does not capture these distinctions. We introduce Framing-Aware Event Causality Identification (FrECI), a framing-aware extension of ECI that models causal explanations as structured claims including responsibility targets, evaluative framing, source type, and epistemic modality grounded in established framing theories. We construct a multilingual dataset aligned across English, Chinese, and Arabic narratives using shared event anchors. We evaluate FrECI using prompt-based large language model baselines and supervised neural models. Results show that prompt-based baselines struggle to recover complete framed causal claims, while joint supervised models perform substantially better. Finally, we demonstrate that FrECI enables quantitative analysis of divergent causal attribution across narratives.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on hard reasoning and general instruction-following tasks. However, when sampling multiple outputs for the same prompt, they often produce highly homogeneous, repetitive responses, resulting in inefficient exploration. This limits the gains from test-time scaling and constrains the upper bound of RL training. We attribute this issue in part to supervised fine-tuning (SFT): when a single prompt is paired with multiple reference responses, the model is trained to generate diverse outputs under the same prior condition, which induces optimization interference and can lead to diversity collapse. To address this, we propose Prefix-Conditioned SFT (P-SFT), a simple yet effective method that constructs semantically consistent yet distributionally distinct prior contents to different responses, thereby projecting the instruction into distinct latent regions to establish diverse prior distributions and decouple the one-to-many mapping. Experiments on large reasoning language models show that our approach improves absolute performance by 5.3% and increases generation diversity by 198.3% on average, while substantially enhancing output diversity and test-time scaling. Notably, even without any additional training, our prefixing strategy can be applied at inference time alone and still yields significant gains in both diversity and reasoning performance for instruction-tuned LLMs and reasoning-enhanced models.

Abstract:
Knowledge editing aims to modify outdated knowledge in language models efficiently while retaining their original capabilities. Mainstream datasets for knowledge editing are predominantly static and fail to keep in pace with the evolving real-world knowledge. In this work, we introduce CRAFT, an ever-evolving real-world dataset for knowledge editing. It evaluates models on temporal locality, common-sense locality, composite portability and alias portability, providing a comprehensive and challenging evaluation for knowledge editing, on which previous methods hardly achieve balanced performance. Towards flexible real-time knowledge editing, we propose KEDAS, a novel paradigm of knowledge editing alignment featuring diverse edit augmentation and self-adaptive post-alignment inference, exhibiting significant performance gain on both CRAFT and traditional datasets compared to previous methods. We hope this work may serve as a catalyst for shifting the focus of knowledge editing from static update to dynamic evolution.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are shaping global values, yet they frequently exhibit a pronounced WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) cultural bias, marginalizing diverse viewpoints and posing challenges for reconciling diverse populations with varying cultural backgrounds and value systems. In this work, we move beyond simple alignment methods to propose a new paradigm for cross-cultural fairness. We introduce a Nash Consensus Negotiation framework under the formulation of cross-cultural consensus as a Nash Equilibrium. Each LLM iteratively proposes and refines natural-language guidelines, guided by a utility function balancing self-consistency with mutual acceptance, while penalizing redundancy. The process expands the proposal space and converges to a consensus, yielding fair and interpretable consensus outcomes. We evaluate our framework against baselines using quantitative metrics, qualitative analysis, and large-scale human studies. Experiments demonstrate that our framework generates higher-quality and more balanced consensus, effectively mitigating assimilation toward WEIRD values. Furthermore, we finetune diverse LLM architectures with negotiation data via preference optimization and supervised reasoning, reducing cultural distances by up to 95.53%. Overall, our work offers a systematic path to mitigate cultural bias in LLMs by guiding them toward self-consistency, mutually-acceptable equilibria.

Abstract:
This paper explores attention attractors, tokens that draw significantly high attention, in large language models. We analyze them from three perspectives: (1) Functionality: We demonstrate their role in aggregating information from preceding contexts to facilitate future predictions. (2) Distribution: Through layer-wise and token-wise analysis, we reveal that attention attractors are widely distributed across layers but predominantly originate from low-semantic words like "_the". (3) Mechanism: We demonstrate the correlation between attention weights allocated to tokens with their specific activation dimension values. We hope these findings provide new insights into the attention mechanisms of large language models and inspire further exploration.

Abstract:
Understanding and reasoning over tables is a critical capability for many real-world applications. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise on this task, but current approaches remain limited. Fine-tuning based methods strengthen language reasoning; yet they are prone to arithmetic errors and hallucination. In contrast, tool-based methods enable precise table manipulation but rely on rigid schemas and lack semantic understanding. These complementary drawbacks highlight the need for approaches that integrate robust reasoning with reliable table processing. In this work, we propose MIXTURE-OF-MINDS, a multi-agent framework that decomposes table reasoning into three specialized roles: planning, coding, and answering. This design enables each agent to focus on a specific aspect of the task while leveraging code execution for precise table manipulation. Building on this workflow, we introduce a self-improvement training framework that employs Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) rollouts to generate pseudo-gold trajectories and optimize agents with reinforcement learning (RL). Extensive experiments show that MIXTURE-OF-MINDS delivers substantial gains, reaching 62.13% on TableBench and surpassing GPT-o3-mini. These results demonstrate the promise of combining structured multi-agent workflows with RL to advance table understanding.

Abstract:
Robust deployment of large multimodal models (LMMs) in real-world scenarios requires access to external knowledge sources, given the complexity and dynamic nature of real-world information. Existing approaches such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and prompt engineered search agents rely on rigid pipelines, often leading to inefficient or excessive search behaviors. We present MMSearch-R1, the first end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that enables LMMs to perform on-demand, multi-turn search in real-world Internet environments. Our framework integrates both image and text search tools, allowing the model to reason about when and how to invoke them guided by an outcome-based reward with a search penalty. To support training, We collect a multimodal search VQA dataset through a semi-automated pipeline that covers diverse visual and textual knowledge needs and curate a search-balanced subset with both search-required and search-free samples, which proves essential for shaping efficient and on-demand search behavior. Extensive experiments on knowledge-intensive and info-seeking VQA tasks show that our model not only outperforms traditional RAG-based baselines of the same model size, but also matches the performance of a larger RAG-based model while reducing search calls by over 30%. We further analyze key empirical findings to offer actionable insights for advancing research in multimodal search.

Abstract:
Variation in language use, shaped by speakers’ sociocultural background and specific context of use, offers a rich lens into cultural perspectives, values, and opinions. For example, Chinese students discuss healthy eating with words like timing, regularity, and digestion, whereas Americans use vocabulary like balancing food groups and avoiding fat and sugar, reflecting distinct cultural models of nutrition (Banna et al., 2016). The computational study of these Sociocultural Linguistic Phenomena (SLP) has traditionally been done in NLP via tailored analyses of specific groups or topics, requiring specialized data collection and experimental operationalization—a process not well-suited to quick hypothesis exploration and prototyping. To address this, we propose constructing a "sandbox" designed for systematic and flexible sociolinguistic research. Using our method, we construct a demographically/topically split Reddit dataset, Splits!, validated by self-identification and by replicating several known SLPs from existing literature. We showcase the sandbox’s utility with a scalable, two-stage process that filters large collections of potential SLPs (PSLPs) to surface the most promising candidates for deeper, qualitative investigation.

Abstract:
The deployment of large language models (LLMs) is largely hindered by their large number of parameters. Structural pruning has emerged as a promising solution. Prior structured pruning methods directly remove unimportant parameters based on certain metrics, which often causes knowledge loss and necessitates extensive retraining. To overcome this, we introduce a novel pruning method TRSP: Two-Stage Regularization-Based Structured Pruning for LLMs. Specifically, we multiply the output of each transformer layer by an initial learnable weight and iteratively learn these weights by adding their ℓ 1 -norm as a regularization term to the loss function, serving as the first-stage regularization. Subsequently, we apply additional regularization to the difference between the output and input of layers with smaller weights, encouraging the shift of knowledge to the preserved layers. This serves as the second-stage regularization. TRSP retains more knowledge and better preserves model performance than direct parameter elimination. Through extensive experimentation we show that TRSP outperforms strong layer-wise structured pruning methods without requiring retraining. As a layer-wise pruning method, it delivers notable end-to-end acceleration, making it a promising solution for efficient LLM deployment.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success, yet they often suffer from producing unnecessary and verbose reasoning chains. We identify a core aspect of this issue as ”invalid thinking”— models tend to repeatedly double-check their work after having derived the correct answer. To address this specific inefficiency, we move beyond the general principles of Efficacy and Efficiency to propose two new, fine-grained principles: Brevity, which advocates for eliminating redundancy, and Sufficiency, which ensures critical reasoning steps are preserved. Guided by these principles, we introduce LC-R1, a post-training method based on Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). LC-R1 employs a novel combination of a Length Reward for overall conciseness and a Compress Reward that is specifically designed to remove the invalid portion of the thinking process. Extensive experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that LC-R1 achieves a significant reduction in sequence length (5̃0%) with only a marginal (2̃%) drop in accuracy, achieving a favorable trade-off point on the Pareto frontier that prioritizes high compression. Our analysis further validates the robustness of LC-R1 and provides valuable insights for developing more powerful yet computationally efficient LRMs.

Abstract:
Causal tracing systematically intervenes on a large language model’s (LLM’s) internal representations to uncover and quantify the causal pathways linking specific inputs or computations to specific metrics of interest, quantifying the LLM’s behavior. Building on previous single-component or single-layer studies, this paper presents a unified framework for causally tracing multiple components simultaneously. This framework systematically identifies the subsets of components (e.g., attention heads and multi-layer perceptron neurons) most critical to a desired target performance metric (e.g., accuracy and fairness). This is achieved by incorporating flexible interventions applied to a wide range of desired metrics. To address the combinatorial complexity of the multi-component problem, an efficient algorithm is designed that leverages soft interventions and a carefully designed metric transformation, converting the combinatorial search problem into a continuous one that can be solved efficiently under proper constraints, thereby generating proper binary decisions for selecting components. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method efficiently identifies subsets of the model’s components that have a high impact on the target metric, outperforming existing baseline approaches.

Abstract:
Effective long-term memory management is crucial for language models handling extended contexts. We introduce the Enhanced Ranked Memory Augmented Retrieval ERMAR framework, which dynamically ranks memory entries based on relevance. Unlike prior models, ERMAR employs a novel relevance scoring mechanism and a pointwise re-ranking model for key-value embeddings, inspired by learning-to-rank techniques in information retrieval. By integrating historical usage patterns and adaptive retrieval, ERMAR achieves state-of-the-art results on standard benchmarks, demonstrating superior scalability and performance in long-context tasks.

Abstract:
Transformers excel at sequence modeling but face quadratic complexity, while linear attention offers improved efficiency but often compromises recall accuracy over long contexts. In this work, we introduce Native Hybrid Attention (NHA) , a novel hybrid architecture of linear and full attention that integrates both intra inter-layer hybridization into a unified layer design. NHA maintains long-term context in key–value slots updated by a linear RNN, and augments them with short-term tokens from a sliding window. A single softmax attention operation is then applied over all keys and values, enabling per-token and per-head context-dependent weighting without requiring additional fusion parameters. The inter-layer behavior is controlled through a single hyperparameter, the sliding window size, which allows smooth adjustment between purely linear and full attention while keeping all layers structurally uniform. Experimental results show that NHA surpasses Transformers and other hybrid baselines on recall-intensive and commonsense reasoning tasks. Furthermore, pretrained LLMs can be structurally hybridized with NHA, achieving competitive accuracy while delivering significant efficiency gains. Code is available at https://github.com/JusenD/NHA .

Abstract:
Modeling fine-grained speaking styles remains challenging for language-speech representation pre-training, as existing speech-text models are typically trained with coarse captions or task-specific supervision, and scalable fine-grained style annotations are unavailable. We present FCaps, a large-scale dataset with fine-grained free-text style descriptions, encompassing 47k hours of speech and 19M fine-grained captions annotated via a novel end-to-end pipeline that directly grounds detailed captions in audio, thereby avoiding the error propagation caused by LLM-based rewriting in existing cascaded pipelines. Evaluations using LLM-as-a-judge demonstrate that our annotations surpass existing cascaded annotations in terms of correctness, coverage, and naturalness. Building on FCaps, we propose CLSP, a contrastive language-speech pre-trained model that integrates global and fine-grained supervision, enabling unified representations across multiple granularities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CLSP learns fine-grained and multi-granular speech-text representations that perform reliably across global and fine-grained speech-text retrieval, zero-shot paralinguistic classification, and speech style similarity scoring, with strong alignment to human judgments. Code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/yfyeung/CLSP.

Abstract:
The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised significant privacy concerns regarding the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) in user prompts. To address this challenge, we propose a query-unrelated PII masking strategy and introduce PII-Bench, the first comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing privacy protection systems. PII-Bench comprises 2,842 test samples across 7 PII types with 55 fine-grained subcategories, featuring diverse scenarios from single-subject descriptions to complex multi-party interactions. Each sample is carefully crafted with a user query, context description, and standard answer indicating query-relevant PII. Our empirical evaluation reveals that while current models perform adequately in basic PII detection, they show significant limitations in determining PII query relevance. Even advanced LLMs struggle with this task, particularly in handling complex multi-subject scenarios, indicating substantial room for improvement in achieving intelligent PII masking.

Abstract:
While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in image captioning, existing research primarily focuses on real-world scenarios, leaving surreal, highly stylized, and semantically hybrid virtual-world scenarios significantly underexplored. In this work, we introduce Game Character Captioning , a novel task designed to evaluate LVLMs’ capability to perceive and describe game character from the virtual-world. To facilitate evaluation, we establish GC-Bench , a manually annotated benchmark, and propose Graph-F1 to effectively assess performance on this task. Our evaluation reveals that: (1) current state-of-the-art LVLMs, including closed-source giants such as Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.1, struggle to maintain the high performance seen in real-world scenarios; and (2) a notable gap exists between open-source and closed-source models. To bridge this gap, we construct GC-148K , a large-scale dataset generated via a specialized data pipeline, and develop the G-Cap series. Experiments demonstrate that G-Cap series rivals the performance of advanced closed-source models at a lower cost, offering an efficient solution for industrial-grade production environment.

Abstract:
Although artificial intelligence (AI) shows growing promise for mental health care, current approaches to evaluating AI tools in this domain remain fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience. This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation – what is measured, by whom, and for what purpose – by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity, providing a structured basis for evaluation. Through an analysis of 135 recent CL publications, we identify recurring limitations, including over-reliance on generic metrics that do not capture clinical validity, therapeutic appropriateness, or user experience, limited participation from mental health professionals, and insufficient attention to safety and equity. To address these gaps, we propose a taxonomy of AI mental health support types – assessment-, intervention-, and information synthesis-oriented – each with distinct risks and evaluative requirements, and illustrate its use through case studies.

Abstract:
Emotion is a core paralinguistic feature in voice interaction. It is widely believed that emotion understanding models learn fundamental representations that transfer to synthesized speech, making emotion understanding results a plausible reward or evaluation metric for assessing emotional expressiveness in speech synthesis. In this work, we critically examine this assumption by systematically evaluating Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) on synthesized speech across datasets, discriminative and generative SER models, and diverse synthesis models. We find that current SER models can not generalize to synthesized speech, largely because speech token prediction during synthesis induces a representation mismatch between synthesized and human speech. Moreover, generative Speech Language Models (SLMs) tend to infer emotion from textual semantics while ignoring paralinguistic cues. Overall, our findings suggest that existing SER models often exploit non-robust shortcuts rather than capturing fundamental features, and paralinguistic understanding in SLMs remains challenging.

Abstract:
GUI agents have demonstrated remarkable progress in automating complex user interface interactions. However, training such agents for long-horizon tasks remains challenging. Single-turn reinforcement learning conditions on expert histories during training but self-generated histories during deployment, causing distribution mismatch. Online multi-turn methods eliminate this gap via environment interaction but suffer from sparse rewards and prohibitive costs. We propose ̲ E xperience-driven ̲ M ulti-turn ̲ P olicy ̲ O ptimization ( EMPO ), which leverages expert trajectories as environment experiences for on-policy multi-turn training. The agent constructs self-generated history throughout rollouts; when actions match expert experiences, the trajectory provides valid state transitions, and a Patch Module recovers mismatched steps to maintain on-policy rollouts. EMPO further incorporates discounted future rewards and dual-level advantage estimation to capture long-horizon dependencies. We also propose AndroidControl-Real , an evaluation metric strongly correlated with real-world performance (R 2 =0.934). With only 1K public trajectories as RL experiences, our method achieves substantial gains over the base model (e.g., +12.0% on AndroidWorld and +23.8% on AITW) and achieves competitive performance against strong baselines such as UI-TARS-7B and GPT-4o, demonstrating better generalization than prior single-turn RL approaches. Code available: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/UI-S1-0DAF .

Abstract:
Existing benchmarks and training pipelines for industrial intelligent customer service (ICS) remain misaligned with real-world dialogue requirements, overemphasizing verifiable task success while under-measuring subjective service quality and realistic failure modes, leaving a gap between offline gains and deployable dialogue behavior. We close this gap with a benchmark-to-optimization loop: we first introduce OlaBench, an ICS benchmark spanning retrieval-augmented generation, workflow-based systems, and agentic settings, which evaluates service capability, safety, and latency sensitivity; moreover, motivated by OlaBench results showing state-of-the-art LLMs still fall short, we propose OlaMind, which distills reusable reasoning patterns and service strategies from expert dialogues and applies staged exploration–exploitation reinforcement learning with instance-level rubric-aware guidance to improve model capability. OlaMind surpasses GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Pro on OlaBench (83.64 vs. 70.58/70.84) and, in online A/B tests, delivers an average +23.67% issue resolution and -6.6% human transfer rate versus the baseline, bridging offline gains to deployment. Together, OlaBench and OlaMind advance ICS systems toward more anthropomorphic, professional, and reliable deployment. The project page and evaluation are available at https://olamind-olabench.github.io.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing agentic search. However, its performance is often hindered by reward sparsity, whereby agents receive very limited positive feedback despite incurring significant exploration costs. In this paper, we formalize this challenge as a new research problem termed Reward Density Optimization, which aims to improve the reward obtained per unit of exploration cost. To address this problem, we introduce InfoFlow, a systematic framework that operates along three complementary dimensions: 1) Sub-goal Scaffolding: which decomposes long-horizon tasks into intermediate objectives and assigns process-level rewards to provide denser learning signals; 2) Pathfinding Hints: which injects corrective guidance into stalled trajectories to increase the ratio of successful trials; and 3) Dual-agent Refinement: which employs a dual-agent architecture to offload the cognitive burden of deep exploration. We evaluate InfoFlow on several popular agentic search benchmarks, where it significantly outperforms strong baselines and enables lightweight LLMs to achieve performance comparable to that of advanced proprietary models.

Abstract:
Large embedding models have become the backbone of modern retrieval systems, offering strong semantic representations at the cost of substantial storage and computation. While recent work explores quantizing embeddings into discrete document identifiers for generative retrieval, most existing approaches rely on Euclidean quantization, which is poorly aligned with the angular geometry induced by contrastive embedding training and often requires long identifier sequences to preserve semantic fidelity. In this work, we propose Hyperspherical Householder Quantization (HHQ), a geometry-aware distillation method that compresses large embeddings into short discrete representations via iterative Householder transformations on the unit hypersphere. By explicitly preserving cosine similarity at each step, HHQ distills semantic structure into compact identifiers that remain faithful to the original embedding space. To support reliable generation of these identifiers, we introduce constrained supervised fine-tuning and tree-aware dynamic masking to enforce structural validity during training and inference. Experiments on NQ and MS MARCO show that HHQ achieves competitive or superior retrieval performance using only five tokens per document, substantially reducing decoding cost while retaining strong semantic retrieval accuracy.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in security-sensitive applications, where they must follow system- or developer-specified instructions that define the intended task behavior, while completing benign user requests. When adversarial instructions appear in user queries or externally retrieved content, models may override intended logic. Recent defenses rely on supervised fine-tuning with benign and malicious labels. Although these methods achieve high attack rejection rates, we find that they rely on narrow correlations in defense data rather than harmful intent, leading to systematic rejection of safe inputs. We analyze three recurring shortcut behaviors induced by defense fine-tuning. Position bias arises when benign content placed later in a prompt is rejected at much higher rates; across reasoning benchmarks, suffix-task rejection rises from below 10% to as high as 90%. Token trigger bias occurs when strings common in attack data raise rejection probability even in benign contexts; inserting a single trigger token increases false refusals by up to 50%. Topic generalization bias reflects poor generalization beyond the defense data distribution, with defended models suffering test-time accuracy drops of up to 40%. These findings suggest that current prompt-injection defenses frequently respond to attack-like surface patterns rather than the underlying intent. We introduce controlled diagnostic datasets and a systematic evaluation across two base models and multiple defense pipelines, highlighting limitations of supervised fine-tuning for reliable LLM security.

Abstract:
Language plays a critical role in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, yet the linguistic characteristics of the datasets used to train and evaluate these systems remain poorly documented. In this work, we present a systematic dataset audit of several widely used VLA corpora, aiming to characterize what kinds of instructions these datasets actually contain and how much linguistic variety they provide. We quantify instruction language along complementary dimensions—including lexical variety, duplication and overlap, semantic similarity, and syntactic complexity. Our analysis shows that many datasets rely on highly repetitive, template-like commands with limited structural variation, yielding a narrow distribution of instruction forms. We position these findings as descriptive documentation of the language signal available in current VLA training and evaluation data, intended to support more detailed dataset reporting, more principled dataset selection, and targeted curation or augmentation strategies that broaden language coverage.

Abstract:
Role-playing agents (RPAs) require balancing multiple objectives, such as instruction following, persona consistency, and stylistic fidelity, which are not always perfectly aligned across different dimensions. While prior work has primarily relied on supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning with scalarized rewards, these approaches do not explicitly address the coordination of multiple reward dimensions during optimization. We present MOA (Multi-Objective Alignment), a reinforcement-learning framework that enables multi-dimensional, fine-grained rubric optimization for general RPAs. MOA introduces a novel multi-objective optimization strategy that trains simultaneously on multiple fine-grained rubrics to boost optimization performance. Besides, to address the issues of model output diversity and quality, we have also employed thought-augmented rollout with off-policy guidance. Experiments on PersonaGym and RoleMRC show that MOA consistently improves multi-dimensional role-playing performance over supervised and standard RL baselines. Under identical evaluation protocols, an 8B model trained with MOA reaches performance competitive with strong closed-source models across multiple evaluation dimensions. These results suggest that MOA provides a practical framework for training more capable general-purpose role-playing agents.

Abstract:
Recent work has shown that directly fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for dense retrieval yields strong performance, but their substantial parameter counts make them computationally inefficient. While prior studies have revealed significant layer redundancy in LLMs for generative tasks, it remains unclear whether similar redundancy exists when these models are adapted for retrieval tasks, which require encoding entire sequences into fixed representations rather than generating tokens iteratively. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of layer redundancy in LLM-based dense retrievers. We find that, in contrast to generative settings, MLP layers are substantially more prunable, while attention layers remain critical for semantic aggregation. Building on this insight, we propose EffiR, a framework for developing efficient retrievers that performs large-scale MLP compression through a coarse-to-fine strategy (coarse-grained depth reduction followed by fine-grained width reduction), combined with retrieval-specific fine-tuning. Across diverse BEIR datasets and LLM backbones, EffiR achieves substantial reductions in model size and inference cost while preserving the performance of full-size models.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have highlighted the effectiveness of chain-of-thought reasoning in symbolic domains such as mathematics and programming. However, our study shows that directly transferring such text-based reasoning paradigms to protein function understanding is ineffective: reinforcement learning mainly amplifies superficial keyword patterns while failing to introduce new biological knowledge, resulting in limited generalization. We argue that protein function prediction is a knowledge-intensive scientific task that fundamentally relies on external biological priors and computational tools rather than purely internal reasoning. To address this gap, we propose Protein Function Understanding Agent (PFUA), a tool-augmented protein reasoning agent that unifies problem decomposition, tool invocation, and grounded answer generation. Instead of relying on long unconstrained reasoning traces, PFUA integrates domain-specific tools to produce verifiable intermediate evidence. Experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that PFUA consistently outperforms text-only reasoning models with an average performance improvement of 103%. We believe PFUA has the potential to become a standard paradigm for agentic reasoning in knowledge-intensive life science domains.

Abstract:
Long-form question answering (LFQA) requires open-ended long-form responses that synthesize coherent, factually grounded content from multi-source evidence. This makes reinforcement learning (RL) reward design critical. The reward must be verifiable for faithful grounding and stable optimization. However, many standard rewards assume a unique target with an exact-match notion of correctness, which fits short-form QA and math but breaks in LFQA. As a result, current RAG systems still lack verifiable reward mechanisms, yielding unstable feedback signals and suboptimal optimization outcomes. We propose RioRAG, a framework for reinforced verifiable informativeness optimization. First, it defines informativeness as a measurable and externally verifiable objective for RL. Second, RioRAG uses nugget-centric verification with cross-source checks to enable self-evolution of smaller LLMs and to provide denser, action-discriminative rewards that mitigate reward sparsity and stabilize optimization. This formulation avoids handcrafted supervision for the policy model and strong teacher-model distillation, relying instead on externally verifiable feedback. Experiments on LongFact and RAGChecker show that RioRAG achieves higher factual recall and faithfulness, establishing verifiable reward modeling as a foundation for trustworthy long-form RAG. Our codes are available at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/RioRAG.

Abstract:
Chatbot service providers (e.g., OpenAI) rely on tiered subscription plans to generate revenue, offering black-box access to basic models for free users and advanced models to paying subscribers. However, this approach is unprofitable and inflexible. A pay-to-unlock scheme for premium features (e.g., math, coding) offers a more sustainable alternative. Enabling such a scheme requires a feature-locking technique (FLoTE) that is (i) effective in refusing locked features, (ii) utility-preserving for unlocked features, (iii) robust against evasion or unauthorized credential sharing, and (iv) scalable to multiple features and clients. Existing FLoTEs (e.g., password-locked models) fail to meet these criteria. To fill this gap, we present Locket, a more robust and scalable FLoTE to enable pay-to-unlock schemes. We develop a framework for adversarial training and merging of feature-locking adapters, which enables Locket to selectively disable specific features of a model. Evaluation shows that Locket is effective (100% refusal rate), utility-preserving ( ≤ 7% utility degradation), robust ( ≤ 5% attack success rate), and scalable to multiple features and clients.

Abstract:
A promising direction for enabling private queries to large language models (LLMs) is with homomorphic encryption (HE). An open problem is performing token sampling under HE. In this paper, we introduce Hyperion, an efficient HE algorithm for inverse transform sampling, enabling private token sampling with 1 comparison depth, O(1) amortized comparisons, and O( log n) rotations. We implement our approach and demonstrate that it samples tokens in 0.14 seconds for 32k tokens ( ≈ 4.4\ 𝜇 s per token) on GPU, achieving a 100× latency improvement over prior work.

Abstract:
Existing web agents typically initiate exploration from the root URL, which is inefficient for complex websites with deep hierarchical structures. Without a global view of the website’s structure, agents frequently fall into navigation traps, explore irrelevant branches, or fail to reach target information within a limited budget. We propose Mango, a multi-agent web navigation method that leverages the website structure to dynamically determine optimal starting points. We formulate URL selection as a multi-armed bandit problem and employ Thompson Sampling to adaptively allocate the navigation budget across candidate URLs. Furthermore, we introduce an episodic memory component to store navigation history, enabling the agent to learn from previous attempts. Experiments on WebVoyager demonstrate that Mango achieves a success rate of 63.6% when using GPT-5-mini, outperforming the best baseline by 7.3%. Furthermore, on WebWalkerQA, Mango attains a 52.5% success rate, surpassing the best baseline by 26.8%. We also demonstrate the generalizability of Mango using both open-source and closed-source models as backbones. Our data and code are open-source and available at https://github.com/VichyTong/Mango.

Abstract:
Sign Language Production (SLP) is the process of converting the complex input text into a real video. Most previous works focused on the Text2Gloss, Gloss2Pose, Pose2Vid stages, and some concentrated on Prompt2Gloss and Text2Avatar stages. However, this field has made slow progress due to the inaccuracy of text conversion, pose generation, and the rendering of poses into real human videos in these stages, resulting in gradually accumulating errors. Therefore, in this paper, we streamline the traditional redundant structure, simplify and optimize the task objective, and design a new sign language generative model called Stable Signer. It redefines the SLP task as a hierarchical generation end-to-end task that only includes text understanding (Prompt2Gloss, Text2Gloss) and Pose2Vid, and executes text understanding through our proposed new Sign Language Understanding Linker called SLUL, and generates hand gestures through the named SLP-MoE hand gesture rendering expert block to end-to-end generate high-quality and multi-style sign language videos. SLUL is trained using the newly developed Semantic-Aware Gloss Masking Loss (SAGM Loss). Its performance has improved by 48.6% compared to the current SOTA generation methods, which is a significant increase in the SLP field. More demo can be obtained at [anonymous url](https://anonymoussubmissionurl.github.io/Stable-Signer).

Abstract:
Aspect-Term Sentiment Analysis (ATSA) in multi-aspect sentences faces a fundamental tradeoff between efficiency and expressiveness. Existing models either re-encode the sentence for each aspect or rely on static use of deep representations, leading to redundant computation and limited adaptivity. We argue that Transformer depth is a costly, queryable resource, and propose DABS , a single-pass inference framework that encodes each sentence once to construct a reusable, depth-ordered substrate. Each aspect then queries this shared representation to selectively read relevant tokens and abstraction levels, without re-encoding. This decouples shared sentence encoding from lightweight, aspect-conditioned readout. Experiments on four ATSA benchmarks show that DABS achieves competitive performance while reducing end-to-end computation by up to 60% in multi-aspect settings ( M ≥ 2 ). Further analyses indicate that adaptive depth querying is most beneficial for linguistically complex cases such as negation and contrast. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/panzhzh/acl-dabs.

Abstract:
Grammaticality and likelihood are distinct notions in human language. Pretrained language models (LMs), which are probabilistic models of language fitted to maximize corpus likelihood, generate grammatically well-formed text and discriminate well between grammatical and ungrammatical sentences in tightly controlled minimal pairs. However, their string probabilities do not sharply discriminate between grammatical and ungrammatical sentences overall. But do LMs implicitly acquire a grammaticality distinction distinct from string probability? We explore this question through studying pretrained LMs’ internal representations, by training a linear probe on a dataset of grammatical and (synthetic) ungrammatical sentences obtained by applying perturbations to a naturalistic text corpus. We find that this simple grammaticality probe generalizes to human-curated grammaticality judgment benchmarks and outperforms LM probability-based grammaticality judgments. When applied to semantic plausibility benchmarks, however, in which both members of a minimal pair are grammatical and differ in only plausibility, the probe performs worse than string probability. The English-trained probe also exhibits nontrivial cross-lingual generalization, outperforming string probabilities on grammaticality benchmarks in numerous other languages. Additionally, probe scores correlate only weakly with string probabilities. These results collectively suggest that pretrained LMs acquire to some extent an implicit grammaticality distinction within their hidden layers.

Abstract:
Do Large Language Models (LLMs) genuinely grasp the compositional semantics of events, or do they rely on surface-level probabilistic heuristics? We investigate the Imperfective Paradox, a logical phenomenon where the past progressive aspect entails event realization for activities (e.g., running → ran) but not for accomplishments (e.g., building ↛ built). We introduce ImperfectiveNLI, a diagnostic dataset designed to probe this distinction across diverse semantic classes. Evaluating state-of-the-art open-weight models, we uncover a pervasive Teleological Bias: models systematically hallucinate completion for goal-oriented events, even overriding explicit textual cancellation. Prompting interventions partially reduce this bias but trigger a calibration crisis, causing models to incorrectly reject valid entailments for atelic verbs. Representational analyses further show that while internal embeddings often distinguish progressive from simple past forms, inference decisions are dominated by strong priors about goal attainment. Taken together, our findings indicate that these current open-weight LLMs operate as predictive narrative engines rather than faithful logical reasoners, and that resolving aspectual inference requires moving beyond prompting toward structurally grounded alignment.

Abstract:
What is the interplay between semantic representations learned by language models (LM) from surface form alone to those learned from more grounded evidence? We study this question for a scenario where part of the input comes from a different modality—in our case, in a vision-language model (VLM), where a pretrained LM is aligned with a pretrained image encoder. As a case study we focus on the task of predicting hypernyms of objects represented in images. We do so in a VLM setup where the image encoder and LM are kept frozen, and only the intermediate mappings are learned. We progressively deprive the VLM of explicit evidence for hypernyms, and test whether the knowledge is recoverable from the LM. We find that the LMs we study can recover this knowledge and generalize even in the most extreme version of this experiment (when the model receives no evidence of a hypernym during training). Additional experiments suggest that this cross-modal taxonomic generalization persists under counterfactual image–label mappings only when the counterfactual data have high visual similarity within each category. Taken together, these findings suggest that cross-modal generalization in LMs arises from an interaction between linguistic structure and the information present in the input.

Abstract:
End-to-end GUI agents for real desktop environments require large amounts of high-quality interaction data, yet collecting human demonstrations is expensive and existing synthetic pipelines often suffer from limited task diversity or noisy, goal-drifting trajectories. We present a trajectory expansion framework Anchor that bootstraps scalable desktop supervision from a small set of verified seed demonstrations. Starting from each seed, we identify branch points that correspond to meaningful state changes and propose new, state-grounded task variants conditioned on the current GUI context. An executing agent then follows the proposed instructions to generate new trajectories, while a verifier enforces task completion via state-aware checks and trajectory-level consistency. To improve supervision quality, we further apply task-conditioned step-level filtering to remove ungrounded actions and denoise post-branch segments to maintain coherent intent. Experiments on standard desktop benchmarks, OSWorld and WindowsAgentArena, show that models fine-tuned on our expanded corpus achieve consistent improvements over zero-shot agents and representative synthesis baselines, and generalize across applications and operating systems.

Abstract:
Current text anonymization evaluation relies on span-based metrics that fail to capture what an adversary could actually infer, and assumes a single data subject, ignoring multi-subject scenarios. To address these limitations, we present SPIA (Subject-level PII Inference Assessment), the first benchmark that shifts the unit of evaluation from text spans to individuals, comprising 675 documents across legal and online domains with novel subject-level protection metrics. Extensive experiments show that even when over 90% of PII spans are masked, subject-level inference protection drops as low as 33%, leaving the majority of personal information recoverable through contextual inference. Furthermore, target-subject-focused anonymization leaves non-target subjects substantially more exposed than the target subject. We show that subject-level inference-based evaluation is essential for ensuring safe text anonymization in real-world settings.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, particularly in solving complex mathematical problems. Recent studies show that distilling long reasoning trajectories can effectively enhance the reasoning performance of small-scale student models. However, teacher-generated reasoning trajectories are often excessively long and structurally complex, making them difficult for student models to learn. This mismatch leads to a gap between the provided supervision signal and the learning capacity of the student model. To address this challenge, we propose Prefix-ALIGNment distillation (P-ALIGN), a framework that fully exploits teacher CoTs for distillation through adaptive prefix alignment. Specifically, P-ALIGN adaptively truncates teacher-generated reasoning trajectories by determining whether the remaining suffix is concise and sufficient to guide the student model. Then, P-ALIGN leverages the teacher-generated prefix to supervise the student model, encouraging effective prefix alignment. Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that P-ALIGN outperforms all baselines by over 3%. Further analysis indicates that the prefixes constructed by P-ALIGN provide more effective supervision signals, while avoiding the negative impact of redundant and uncertain reasoning components. All codes are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/P-ALIGN.

Abstract:
Logical reasoning is a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs). However, existing studies largely overlook the interplay between logical complexity and semantic complexity, limiting their robustness under abstract propositions, ambiguous contexts, and conflicting stances, which are central to human reasoning. We propose LogicAgent, a semiotic-square–guided framework that jointly addresses these two axes of difficulty. The semiotic square provides a principled structure for multi-perspective semantic analysis, and LogicAgent integrates automated deduction with reflective verification to manage logical complexity across deeper reasoning chains. To evaluate reasoning under coupled semantic and logical complexity, we introduce RepublicQA, a benchmark that contains abstract propositions with systematically constructed contrary and contradictory forms, providing a semantically rich setting for assessing logical reasoning in LLMs. Experiments show that LogicAgent achieves state-of-the-art performance on RepublicQA with a 6.25% average gain, and generalizes well to four mainstream logical reasoning benchmarks with an additional 7.05% improvement, highlighting the effectiveness of our semiotic-grounded multi-perspective reasoning in boosting LLMs’ logical performance.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) enhances LLM reasoning but often induces overconfidence, where incorrect responses yield lower perplexity than correct ones, degrading relative calibration as described by the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Existing approaches either yield limited improvements in calibration or sacrifice gains in reasoning accuracy. We first prove that this degradation in GRPO-style algorithms stems from their uncertainty-agnostic advantage estimation, which inevitably misaligns optimization gradients with calibration. This leads to improved accuracy at the expense of degraded calibration. We then propose Calibration-Aware Policy Optimization (CAPO). It adopts a logistic AUC surrogate loss that is theoretically consistent and admits regret bound, enabling uncertainty-aware advantage estimation. By further incorporating a noise masking mechanism, CAPO achieves stable learning dynamics that jointly optimize calibration and accuracy. Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CAPO-1.5B significantly improves calibration by up to 15% while achieving accuracy comparable to or better than GRPO, and further boosts accuracy on downstream inference-time scaling tasks by up to 5%. Moreover, when allowed to abstain under low-confidence conditions, CAPO achieves a Pareto-optimal precision–coverage trade-off, highlighting its practical value for hallucination mitigation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as k -Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner’s hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages. Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms k -Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.

Abstract:
In multimodal information retrieval (MMIR), candidates relevant to an input query need to be retrieved from a database, where the query and database items span different modalities. As real-world databases evolve, repeatedly annotating and indexing data and re-optimizing domain-specific models across modalities is impractical. We present MULTI-SCORE, a fine-tuning-free, two-stage MMIR approach that couples efficient candidate filtering with fine-grained multimodal re-ranking. Stage-1 adopts Matryoshka representations to efficiently filter out low-relevance candidates without expensive similarity computations on full-scale representations for the entire database. Stage-2 re-ranks the filtered candidates by computing their fine-grained multimodal contextual representations with two scoring functions for semantic alignment using chain-of-thought prompting and question-answering. Experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art zero-shot retrieval on 12 MMIR tasks across 32 datasets while outperforming supervised methods on 23 datasets.

Abstract:
Chart-to-code generation converts a chart image into an executable plotting script, enabling faithful reproduction and editable visualizations. Existing methods are largely Python-centric, limiting practical use and overlooking a critical source of supervision: the same chart can be expressed by semantically equivalent scripts in different plotting languages. To fill this gap, we introduce Chart2NCode, a dataset of 176K charts paired with aligned scripts in Python, R, and LaTeX that render visually equivalent outputs, constructed via a metadata-to-template pipeline with rendering verification and human quality checks. Building on a LLaVA-style architecture, we further propose CharLuMA, a parameter-efficient adaptation module that augments the multimodal projector with a language-conditioned mixture of low-rank subspaces, allowing the model to share core chart understanding while specializing code generation to the target language through lightweight routing. Extensive experiments show consistent gains in executability and visual fidelity across all languages, outperforming strong open-source baselines and remaining competitive with proprietary systems. Further analyses reveal that balanced multi-language supervision benefits all languages and that the adapter allocates a compact shared core plus language-specific capacity.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit human-like cognitive reasoning strategies (e.g. backtracking, cross-verification) during reasoning process, which improves their performance on complex tasks. Currently, reasoning strategies are autonomously selected by LRMs themselves. However, such autonomous selection often produces inefficient or even erroneous reasoning paths. To make reasoning more reliable and flexible, it is important to develop methods for controlling reasoning strategies. Existing methods struggle to control fine-grained reasoning strategies due to conceptual entanglement in LRMs’ hidden states. To address this, we leverage Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to decompose strategy-entangled hidden states into a disentangled feature space. To identify the few strategy-specific features from the vast pool of SAE features, we propose SAE-Steering, an efficient two-stage feature identification pipeline. SAE-Steering first recalls features that amplify the logits of strategy-specific keywords, filtering out over 99% of features, and then ranks the remaining features by their control effectiveness. Using the identified strategy-specific features as control vectors, SAE-Steering outperforms existing methods by over 15% in control effectiveness. Furthermore, controlling reasoning strategies can redirect LRMs from erroneous paths to correct ones, achieving a 7% absolute accuracy improvement.

Abstract:
Audio carries richer information than text, including emotion, speaker traits, and environmental context, while also enabling lower-latency processing compared to speech-to-text pipelines. However, recent multimodal information retrieval research has predominantly focused on images, largely overlooking audio, especially in the setting of interleaved audio-text contextual retrieval. In this work, we introduce the Audio-Text Interleaved contextual Retrieval (ATIR) task, where queries can alternate between audio and text modalities. We construct an ATIR benchmark by integrating several Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), QA, and retrieval datasets, ultimately unifying four types of contextual retrieval tasks. This benchmark substantially addresses the limitations of existing audio retrieval datasets in semantic retrieval. To study this task, we evaluate several off-the-shelf retrievers and train our ATIR model based on a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM). We further propose a novel token compression mechanism, which is orthogonal to existing compression methods, to mitigate the challenge of excessive audio tokens in MLLM-based ATIR models. Experimental results show that our ATIR model achieves significant improvements over strong baselines.

Abstract:
Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in processing various graph problems. Substructure counting remains challenging in both scalability and accuracy. Incorporating sensitive edge information into the input prompts also introduces significant privacy risks of exposing the private information of user connections in real-world applications. This paper, for the first time, studies substructure counting for LLMs under edge local differential privacy (LDP) in a multi-agent framework. Unlike the Naive approach whose estimation relies entirely on overly dense noisy graphs, the proposed PSC framework decomposes substructure counting into node-level tasks distributed among node agents, and embeds the knowledge of distributed algorithms and DP frameworks in the curator agent and privacy controller, respectively. Thus, we can leverage the local neighboring information and reasoning capabilities of node agents to improve the estimation accuracy. Extensive experiments on 6 real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of PSC framework for substructure counting tasks under 𝜀 -edge LDP. Moreover, the non-DP version of PSC also demonstrated superior performance over a single LLM on standard substructure counting tasks.

Abstract:
Information-seeking (IS) agents have achieved strong performance across a range of wide and deep search tasks, yet their tool use remains largely restricted to API-level snippet retrieval and URL-based page fetching, limiting access to the richer information available through real browsing. While full browser interaction could unlock deeper capabilities, its fine-grained control and verbose page content returns introduce substantial complexity for ReAct-style function-calling agents. To bridge this gap, we propose Nested Browser-Use Learning (NestBrowse), which introduces a minimal and complete browser-action framework that decouples interaction control from page exploration through a nested structure. This design simplifies agentic reasoning while enabling effective deep-web information acquisition. Empirical results on challenging deep IS benchmarks demonstrate that NestBrowse offers clear benefits in practice. Further in-depth analyses underscore its efficiency.

Abstract:
Existing detoxification methods for large language models mainly focus on post-training stage or inference time, while few tackle the source of toxicity, namely, the dataset itself. Such training-based or controllable decoding approaches cannot completely suppress the model’s inherent toxicity, whereas detoxifying the pretraining dataset can fundamentally reduce the toxicity that the model learns during training. Hence, we attempt to detoxify directly on raw corpora with SoCD (Soft Contrastive Decoding), which guides an LLM to localize and rewrite toxic spans in raw data while preserving semantics, in our proposed HSPD (Hierarchical Semantic-Preserving Detoxification) pipeline, yielding a detoxified corpus that can drop-in replace the original for fine-tuning or other training. On GPT2-XL, HSPD attains state-of-the-art detoxification, reducing Toxicity Probability (TP) from 0.42 to 0.18 and Expected Maximum Toxicity (EMT) from 0.43 to 0.20. We further validate consistent best-in-class results on LLaMA2-7B, OPT-6.7B, and Falcon-7B. These findings show that semantics-preserving, corpus-level rewriting with HSPD effectively suppresses downstream toxicity while retaining data utility and allowing seamless source-level mitigation, thereby reducing the cost of later model behavior adjustment.

Abstract:
The inherent safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is prone to erosion during fine-tuning, even when using seemingly innocuous datasets. While existing defenses attempt to mitigate this via data selection, they typically rely on heuristic, instance-level assessments that neglect the global geometry of the data distribution and fail to explicitly repel harmful patterns. To address this, we introduce Safety Optimal Transport (SOT), a novel framework that reframes safe fine-tuning from an instance-level filtering challenge to a distribution-level alignment task grounded in Optimal Transport (OT). At its core is a dual-reference “push-pull” weight-learning mechanism: SOT optimizes sample importance by actively pulling the downstream distribution towards a trusted safe anchor while simultaneously pushing it away from a general harmful reference. This establishes a robust geometric safety boundary that effectively purifies the training data. Extensive experiments across diverse model families and domains demonstrate that SOT significantly enhances model safety while maintaining competitive downstream performance, achieving a superior safety-utility trade-off compared to baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) face significant challenges in processing long contexts due to the linear growth of the key-value (KV) cache and quadratic complexity of self-attention. Existing approaches address these bottlenecks separately: Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) reduces the KV cache by projecting tokens into a low-dimensional latent space, while sparse attention reduces computation. However, sparse methods cannot operate natively on MLA’s compressed latent structure, missing opportunities for joint optimization. In this paper, we propose Latent-Condensed Attention (LCA), which directly condenses context within MLA’s latent space, where the representation is disentangled into semantic latent vectors and positional keys. LCA separately aggregates semantic vectors via query-aware pooling and preserves positional keys via anchor selection. This approach jointly reduces both computational cost and KV cache without adding parameters. Beyond MLA, LCA’s design is architecture-agnostic and readily extends to other attention mechanisms such as GQA. Theoretically, we prove a length-independent error bound. Experiments show LCA achieves up to 2.5× prefilling speedup and 90% KV cache reduction at 128K context while maintaining competitive performance.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) for large language models (LLMs) has achieved significant success in various domains. So far, most algorithms in the LoRA-family rely on global low-rank factors spanning the entire update weight matrix ( 𝛥 𝐖 ). Through careful analysis, however, we observe that the 𝛥 𝐖 during fine-tuning typically exhibit heterogeneous subspace clusters, each corresponding to specific sub-sets of rows and columns. This structural heterogeneity suggests that global low-rank factors may not optimally capture the local variations needed for effective model adaptation. To address this limitation, we propose LoRA within Clustered Parameter Subspaces, or CPS-LoRA, which performs independent low-rank updates within clustered blocks of parameter matrices. The key idea is to group the rows/columns of the update matrix into locally coherent, and maximally uncorrelated subspaces, perform low-rank adaptations in each subspace, and iteratively update the partition and local adaptations. This allows adapting to local structures more precisely while preserving high efficiency. Theoretical analysis reveals that in case 𝛥 𝐖 can be partitioned into subspace blocks with non-overlapping basis, CPS-LoRA have superior parameter efficiency than global adaptations. Empirical evaluations further demonstrate better rank utilization of CPS-LoRA and its consistent improvements against LoRA (and variants) by up to 3.0% in absolute accuracy in various benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) with long context windows offer the potential to translate entire documents in a single pass, yet they frequently suffer from catastrophic information distortion, undermining the strict faithfulness required for translation. This challenge is compounded by the scarcity of document-level parallel data, which makes both supervised fine-tuning and reliable evaluation prohibitively expensive. We propose LongDu, a self-supervised post-training framework that improves long-document translation reliability via round-trip consistency. Given monolingual documents, LongDu samples multiple candidate translations, back-translates each candidate, and optimizes the model to prefer translations that best reconstruct the source. To make this signal robust for long-form generation, we design a reward that filters trivial failure modes (e.g., copying and local language drift) before applying a reconstruction and fluency score, enabling stable reinforcement learning without human annotations. We additionally introduce Long-CIRT, an automatic evaluation protocol that quantifies information distortion by measuring how much a LLM’s performance degrades after a translation cycle. Across multiple base models, LongDu substantially improves information retention and translation quality, with gains that generalize beyond the training length range and to unseen target languages.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various fields, yet their training efficiency is heavily reliant on effective data curation. While data selection has been widely studied, the strategic data organization for enhanced training remains an underexplored area, particularly since current LLMs are often trained for only one or a few epochs. This paper systematically explores the influence of data organization on LLM training by reusing pre-computed sample-level scores originally generated for data efficiency, thereby incurring minimal additional computational overhead. We identify and formalize four key guidances for optimizing data organization: Boundary Sharpening, Cyclic Scheduling, Curriculum Continuity, and Local Diversity. Guided by them, we introduce two novel data ordering methods termed STR and SAW. Extensive experiments across different model scales and data sizes, encompassing both pre-training and SFT stages, validate the effectiveness of our summarized guidances. They also demonstrate the robustness of our proposed data ordering methods in enhancing the stability and performance of LLM training.

Abstract:
Hyperparameters are critical to LLM reinforcement learning (RL), but existing hyperparameter optimization (HPO) methods remain inefficient in this area, due to the massive model scale and resource-intensive training cycles. In this paper, we propose Joint Fidelity Hyperparameter Optimization (JF-HPO), which simultaneously adapts both model size and training budget as fidelity. JF-HPO is empowered by: (i) a small proxy model of the target LLM for efficient training and evaluation in each HPO trial; (ii) several carefully designed early-stopping strategies based on training dynamics; (iii) an efficient checkpointing mechanism to eliminate redundant computations. JF-HPO significantly improves the computational efficiency of each trial (up to 14.9 × ) compared with existing HPO methods, thus achieving better predictive accuracy in most cases under the same time budget. Notably, JF-HPO delivers performance improvements ranging from 5.8% to 111.6% over VeRL Recipe.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the predominant paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs), yet it suffers from optimization instability and limited generalization. Recent work attributes this issue to pathological gradient scaling and proposes Dynamic Fine-Tuning (DFT) to correct it at the token level. However, DFT assumes all demonstrations are equally suitable learning targets, an assumption violated by the strong heterogeneity of large-scale instruction data, where demonstration-policy mismatch induces high-variance updates at the sample level. We introduce Compatibility-Aware Dynamic Fine-Tuning (CADFT), a principled extension of DFT that controls sample-level optimization variance. CADFT derives a dynamic, policy-dependent compatibility signal from model likelihoods to modulate supervised updates, suppressing high-variance gradients from incompatible demonstrations. We further propose a delayed, low-frequency compatibility-guided rewriting strategy to transform persistently incompatible demonstrations into learnable targets. We show that CADFT can be interpreted as a variance-controlled estimator that generalizes token-level stabilization in DFT to the sample level. Extensive experiments demonstrate improved stability, generalization, and cold-start reinforcement learning initialization, while remaining fully supervised and free of reward modeling.

Abstract:
Emergent misalignment, where fine-tuning on narrow, non-harmful tasks induces harmful behaviors, poses a key challenge for AI safety in LLMs. Despite growing empirical evidence, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. To uncover the reason behind this phenomenon, we propose a mechanistic account based on the geometry of feature superposition. Because features are encoded in overlapping, fine-tuning that amplifies a target feature also unintentionally strengthens nearby harmful features in accordance with their similarity. We give a simple gradient-level derivation of this mechanism and empirically test it across multiple LLMs (Gemma-2 2B/9B/27B, LLaMA-3.1 8B, gpt-oss 20B). Using sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we identify features tied to misalignment-inducing data and to harmful behaviors, and show that they are geometrically closer to each other than features derived from non-inducing data. This trend generalizes across domains (e.g., health, career, legal advice). Finally, we show that a geometry-aware approach—filtering training samples nearest to toxic features—reduces misalignment by 34.5%, substantially outperforming random removal and achieving stronger mitigation than LLM-as-a-judge–based filtering. Our study explains emergent misalignment through feature superposition, providing a basis for understanding and mitigating this phenomenon.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and text-aware graph learning have increased interest in reasoning over text-attributed graphs(TAGs). In many real-world settings, such graphs are inherently heterogeneous, with most existing benchmarks remaining largely homogeneous in structure. As a result, the lack of large-scale benchmarks for heterogeneous text-attributed graphs has hindered systematic evaluation and fair comparison of existing methods. In this work, we introduce CITE - Catalytic Information Textual Entities Graph, the first and largest heterogeneous text-attributed citation graph benchmark for catalytic materials. CITE contains over 438K nodes and 1.2M edges spanning four node types and four relation types, with rich node-level textual information. We establish standardized evaluation protocols for node classification and link prediction, and conduct ablation studies to assess the impact of graph heterogeneity and textual attributes. Using CITE, we benchmark four classes of learning paradigms, including homogeneous graph models, heterogeneous graph models, LLM-centric models, and hybrid LLM–graph models. By providing a large-scale heterogeneous text-attributed benchmark together with standardized evaluation protocols and comprehensive baselines, CITE enables systematic assessment across diverse modeling paradigms and offers new insights into text-aware and LLM-enhanced graph learning. The dataset, codebase and evaluation suite are publicly available.

Abstract:
Terminal simulation, framed as a terminal command-level Turing test, is a long-standing problem of symbolic language generation in dialogue and interactive systems. Prior scripted simulators lack the flexibility needed for complex, multi-turn interactions, while LLM-based approaches often misinterpret commands, break output formats, drift from system state, and remain vulnerable to prompt injection. In this work, we propose MANTIS, a terminal simulation framework that improves realism, consistency, and robustness in command-language generation. MANTIS integrates a multi-agent architecture with a filter-based routing model that safely dispatches commands to external tools or an LLM-based agent, enabling support for interactive commands while defending against prompt injection attacks. In addition, we design an agentic file system with history pruning to preserve long-term state consistency. We release three datasets: 28,045 real terminal input-output pairs, a 1,000-session multi-turn interaction dataset, and a 25,849-instance labeled classification dataset. MANTIS outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by more than 9%, achieving over 95% accuracy on multi-turn terminal simulation. The dataset and source code are available at https://github.com/kaiwei666a/MANTIS_Terminal_Simulation

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) is central to post-training, particularly for agentic models that require specialized reasoning behaviors. In this setting, model merging offers a practical mechanism for integrating multiple RL-trained agents from different tasks into a single generalist model. However, existing merging methods are designed for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and they are suboptimal to preserve task-specific capabilities on RL-trained agentic models. The root is a task-vector mismatch between RL and SFT: on-policy RL induces task vectors that are highly sparse and heterogeneous, whereas SFT-style merging implicitly assumes dense and globally comparable task vectors. When standard global averaging is applied under this mismatch, RL’s non-overlapping task vectors that encode critical task-specific behaviors are reduced and parameter updates are diluted. To address this issue, we propose Reinforced Agent Merging (RAM), a distribution-aware merging framework explicitly designed for RL-trained agentic models. RAM disentangles shared and task-specific unique parameter updates, averaging shared components while selectively preserving and rescaling unique ones to counteract parameter update dilution. Experiments across multiple agent domains and model architectures demonstrate that RAM not only surpasses merging baselines, but also unlocks synergistic potential among agents to achieve performance superior to that of specialized agents in their domains.

Abstract:
Active Few-Shot Learning (AFSL) adapts LLMs to specialized domains by identifying the most valuable unlabeled samples for annotation and use as few-shot demonstrations, effectively reducing human annotation costs while promoting high performance. However, existing methods typically rely on output-level signals for the sample identification, such as predictive entropy or semantic similarities with test-time data based on external embeddings, which often overlook models’ internal dynamics which could pinpoint specific knowledge gaps. To bridge this gap, we propose NeuFS, a Neuron-Aware Active Few-Shot Learning framework that shifts the selection paradigm from output-level proxies to models’ internal dynamics. NeuFS utilizes neuron activation patterns to represent sample directly, and includes a dual-criteria selection strategy that: (1) ensures few-shot sample diversity with neuron patterns for broader example coverage, while (2) prioritizing on identifying informative and challenging few-shot samples LLMs tend to hallucinate by quantifying neuron consensus. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate that NeuFS excels in both reasoning and text classification tasks, outperforming existing AFSL baselines. Ablation studies further highlight that internal neuron activations provide a more principled and effective selection signal than external embeddings, validating the superiority of the proposed NeuFS.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling evaluates reasoning LLMs by sampling multiple outputs per prompt, but ranking models in this regime remains underexplored. We formalize dense benchmark ranking under test-time scaling and introduce Scorio, a library that implements statistical ranking methods such as paired-comparison models, item response theory (IRT) models, voting rules, and graph- and spectral-based methods. Across 20 reasoning models on four Olympiad-style math benchmarks (AIME’24, AIME’25, HMMT’25, and BrUMO’25; up to N = 80 trials), most full-trial rankings agree closely with the Bayesian gold standard Bayes_𝒰@80 (mean Kendall’s τ_b = 0.93–0.95), and 19–34 methods recover exactly the same ordering. In the single-trial regime, the best methods reach τ_b ≈ 0.86.Using greedy decoding as an empirical prior (Bayes_R₀@N) reduces variance at N = 1 by 16–52%, but can bias rankings when greedy and stochastic sampling disagree. These results identify reliable ranking methods for both high- and low-budget test-time scaling. We release Scorio as an open-source library at https://github.com/mohsenhariri/scorio.

Abstract:
Most LLM safety work studies single-agent models, but many real applications rely on multiple interacting agents. In these systems, prompt segmentation and inter-agent routing create attack surfaces that single-agent evaluations miss. We study conjunctive prompt attacks , where a trigger key in the user query and a hidden adversarial template in one compromised remote agent each appear benign alone but activate harmful behavior when routing brings them together. We consider an attacker who changes neither model weights nor the client agent and instead controls only trigger placement and template insertion. Across star, chain, and DAG topologies, routing-aware optimization substantially increases attack success over non-optimized baselines while keeping false activations low. Existing defenses, including PromptGuard, Llama-Guard variants, and system-level controls such as tool restrictions, do not reliably stop the attack because no single component appears malicious in isolation. These results expose a structural vulnerability in agentic LLM pipelines and motivate defenses that reason over routing and cross-agent composition. Code is available at https://github.com/UCF-ML-Research/ConjunctiveAgents .

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models rely on an external router to assign tokens to experts. This design inherently separates the routing decision from each expert’s internal capabilities, leading to suboptimal performance. In this work, we address this limitation with Union-of-Experts (UoE), an MoE variant that performs "expert-autonomous routing”. The core mechanism of UoE is to pre-designate a minute fraction of neurons within each expert as "routing neurons”. Experts autonomously select relevant tokens by comparing the activation intensity of these neurons, aligning routing decisions with each expert’s functional profile. To prevent the waste of activations from unselected experts’ routing neurons, we aggregate all routing neuron outputs and sum them into the final layer output. This aggregation acts as a novel virtual shared expert whose parameters are distributed across the individual experts, and improves overall parameter efficiency. We pre-train UoE models with up to 3B parameters, demonstrating that they outperform traditional MoEs with matched efficiency. Furthermore, our analysis of the routing neurons provides valuable insights into expert-autonomous selection and the broader routing mechanisms of MoE models.

Abstract:
Code translation across multiple programming languages is essential yet challenging due to two vital obstacles: scarcity of parallel data paired with executable test oracles, and optimization imbalance when handling diverse language pairs. We propose BootTrans, a bootstrapping method that resolves both obstacles. Its key idea is to leverage the functional invariance and cross-lingual portability of test suites, adapting abundant pivot-language unit tests to serve as universal verification oracles for multilingual reinforcement learning (RL) training. Our method introduces a dual-pool architecture with seed and exploration pools to progressively expand training data via execution-guided experience collection.Furthermore, we design a language-aware weighting mechanism that dynamically prioritizes harder translation directions based on relative performance across sibling languages, mitigating optimization imbalance. Extensive experiments on the HumanEval-X and TransCoder-Test benchmarks demonstrate substantial improvements over baseline LLMs across all translation directions, with ablation studies validating the effectiveness of both bootstrapping and weighting components.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) conventionally represent text as sequences of discrete tokens, making long-context scaling largely a matter of processing more tokens more efficiently.We instead explore a complementary direction: increasing how much original context each token represents.To this end, we introduce Glyph, a framework that renders long texts into compact visual pages and processes them with a vision-language model (VLM), allowing a fixed context window to cover substantially more text.To make visual compression practical, Glyph combines continual pre-training on rendered long-text data, an LLM-driven genetic search to identify rendering configurations that balance compression and task performance, and post-training with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning.Across multiple long-context benchmarks, Glyph achieves 3–4× token compression while maintaining performance comparable to strong text-only LLMs such as Qwen3-8B, with over 4× faster prefilling and decoding and 2× faster supervised fine-tuning.Under more aggressive compression, a VLM with a 128K context window can handle tasks that would otherwise require up to 1M input tokens.Our code and model are released at https://github.com/thu-coai/Glyph.

Abstract:
Hallucination remains a critical bottleneck for large language models (LLMs), undermining their reliability in real-world applications, especially in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. While existing hallucination detection methods employ LLM-as-a-judge to verify LLM outputs against retrieved evidence, they suffer from inherent confirmation bias, where the verifier inadvertently reproduces the errors of the original generation. To address this, we introduce Multi-Agent Reinforced self-Check for Hallucination (MARCH), a framework that enforces rigorous factual alignment by leveraging deliberate information asymmetry. MARCH orchestrates a collaborative pipeline of three specialized agents: a Solver, a Proposer, and a Checker. The Solver generates an initial RAG response, which the Proposer decomposes into claim-level verifiable atomic propositions. Crucially, the Checker validates these propositions against retrieved evidence in isolation, deprived of the Solver’s original output. This well-crafted information asymmetry scheme breaks the cycle of self-confirmation bias. By training this pipeline with multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), we enable the agents to co-evolve and optimize factual adherence. Extensive experiments across hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that MARCH substantially reduces hallucination rates. Notably, an 8B-parameter LLM equipped with MARCH achieves performance competitive with powerful closed-source models. MARCH paves a scalable path for factual self-improvement of LLMs through co-evolution. The code is at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/MARCH.

Abstract:
Vision-Language-Action models have recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for general-purpose robot learning, enabling agents to map visual observations and natural-language instructions into executable robotic actions. Though popular, they are primarily trained via supervised fine-tuning or training-time reinforcement learning, requiring explicit fine-tuning phases, human interventions, or controlled data collection. Consequently, existing methods remain unsuitable for challenging simulated- or physical-world deployments, where robots must respond autonomously and flexibly to evolving environments. To address this limitation, we introduce a Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for VLAs (TT-VLA), a framework that enables on-the-fly policy adaptation during inference. TT-VLA formulates a dense reward mechanism that leverages step-by-step task-progress signals to refine action policies during test time while preserving the SFT/RL-trained priors, making it an effective supplement to current VLA models. Empirical results show that our approach enhances overall adaptability, stability, and task success in dynamic, previously unseen scenarios under simulated and real-world settings. We believe TT-VLA offers a principled step toward self-improving, deployment-ready VLAs.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been proposed to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), where generated outputs may be factually incorrect. However, existing RAG approaches predominantly rely on vector similarity for retrieval, which is prone to semantic noise and fails to ensure that generated responses fully satisfy the complex conditions specified by factual queries, often leading to incorrect answers. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel research problem, named Exact Retrieval Problem (ERP). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first problem formulation that explicitly incorporates structural information into RAG for factual questions to satisfy all query conditions. For this novel problem, we propose Structure Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation (SG-RAG), which models the retrieval process as an embedding-based subgraph matching task, and uses the retrieved topological structures to guide the LLM to generate answers that meet all specified query conditions. To facilitate evaluation of ERP, we construct and publicly release Exact Retrieval Question Answering (ERQA), a large-scale dataset comprising 120,000 fact-oriented QA pairs, each involving complex conditions, spanning 20 diverse domains. The experimental results demonstrate that SG-RAG significantly outperforms strong baselines on ERQA, delivering absolute improvements from 20.68 to 50.88 points across all evaluation metrics, while maintaining reasonable computational overhead.

Abstract:
Hallucination—defined here as generated statements unsupported or contradicted by available evidence or conversational context—remains a major obstacle to using conversational AI systems in settings that demand factual reliability. Existing metrics evaluate isolated responses or treat unverifiable content as errors, limiting their use for multi-turn dialogue. We introduce VISTA (Verification In Sequential Turn-based Assessment), a framework for evaluating conversational factuality via claim-level verification and sequential consistency tracking. VISTA decomposes each turn into atomic claims, verifies them against trusted sources and dialogue history, and categorizes unverifiable statements (subjective, contradicted, lacking evidence, or abstaining). Across eight large language models and four dialogue factuality benchmarks (Ais, Begin, FaithDial, and Fade), VISTA substantially improves hallucination detection over FActScore and LLM-as-Judge baselines. Human evaluation confirms that VISTA’s decomposition improves annotator agreement and reveals inconsistencies in existing benchmarks. By modeling factuality as a dynamic property of conversation, VISTA offers a more transparent, human-aligned measure of truthfulness in dialogue systems.

Abstract:
Large vision–language models (VLMs) are highly capable, yet often hallucinate by favoring textual prompts over visual evidence. We study this failure mode in a controlled object-counting setting, where the prompt overstates the number of objects in the image (e.g., asking a model to describe four waterlilies when only three are present). At low object counts, models often correct the overestimation, but as the number of objects increases, they increasingly conform to the prompt regardless of the discrepancy. Through mechanistic analysis of three VLMs, we identify a small set of attention heads whose ablation substantially reduces prompt-induced hallucinations (PIH) by at least 40% without additional training. Across models, PIH-heads mediate prompt copying in model-specific ways. We characterize these differences and show that PIH ablation increases correction toward visual evidence. Our findings offer insights into the internal mechanisms driving prompt-induced hallucinations, revealing model-specific differences in how these behaviors are implemented.

Abstract:
A central goal for mechanistic interpretability has been to identify the right units of analysis in large language models (LLMs) that causally explain their outputs. While early work focused on individual neurons, evidence that neurons often encode multiple concepts has motivated a shift toward analyzing directions in activation space. A key question is how to find directions that capture interpretable features in an unsupervised manner. Current methods rely on dictionary learning with sparse autoencoders (SAEs), commonly trained over residual stream activations to learn directions from scratch. However, SAEs often struggle in causal evaluations and lack intrinsic interpretability, as their learning is not explicitly tied to the computations of the model. Here, we tackle these limitations by directly decomposing MLP activations with semi-nonnegative matrix factorization (SNMF), such that the learned features are (a) sparse linear combinations of co-activated neurons, and (b) mapped to their activating inputs, making them directly interpretable. Experiments on Llama 3.1, Gemma 2 and GPT-2 show that SNMF derived features outperform SAEs and a strong supervised baseline (difference-in-means) on causal steering, while aligning with human-interpretable concepts. Further analysis reveals that specific neuron combinations are reused across semantically-related features, exposing a hierarchical structure in the MLP’s activation space. Together, these results position SNMF as a simple and effective tool for identifying interpretable features and dissecting concept representations in LLMs.

Abstract:
Automatically solving optimization problems from natural language descriptions with both efficiency and reliability is highly desirable but remains challenging. Language model hallucinations and the limited availability of labeled datasets often result in misaligned formulations, code errors, and feasibility failures We propose UMCTS , an Uncertainty-aware Monte Carlo Tree Search framework that combines the language understanding capability of large language models with the reliability of well-established solvers. UMCTS structures the solution process into four stages: global instruction, assumptions, mathematical formulation, and solver code generation. It employs Monte Carlo Tree Search with semantic-equivalence pruning, prior-guided exploration, and solver-based feasibility checks. An LLM judge provides numerical reward signals, qualitative error information, and uncertainty estimates. These signals are backpropagated to guide the search and flag unreliable outputs. Across six public benchmarks, UMCTS achieves state-of-the-art solution accuracy, improves efficiency by reducing token usage.

Abstract:
Recent retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches have demonstrated strong capability in handling complex queries, yet current research overlooks a critical challenge: different retrievers require fundamentally different query formulation strategies for optimal performance. In this work, we present the first systematic analysis of how LLMs can learn to adapt their query formulation strategies for different retrievers via reinforcement learning (RL). Our empirical study reveals that RL effectively teaches an LLM to tailor its queries to specific retriever characteristics. We discover that different retrievers exhibit surprisingly distinct optimal query styles (e.g., descriptive vs. question-like), suggesting strategies learned for one retriever ineffective for another. We further show that performance can be enhanced by incorporating retriever-specific human guidance and by scaling model size. To facilitate learning over multi-retrieval-step trajectories, we introduce a branching-based rollout technique that improves training stability. Our work provides the first empirical evidence and actionable insights for building truly retriever-aware RAG systems. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/LCO-Embedding/Envs-aware-Information-Retrieval.

Abstract:
We propose a lightweight explainable guardrail (LEG) method to detect unsafe prompts. LEG uses a multi-task learning architecture to jointly learn a prompt classifier and an explanation classifier, where the latter labels prompt words that explain the safe/unsafe overall decision. LEG is trained on synthetic explanation data, which is generated using a novel strategy that counteracts the confirmation biases of LLMs. Lastly, LEG’s training process uses a novel loss that captures global explanation signals as a weak supervision and combines cross-entropy and focal losses with uncertainty-based weighting. LEG obtains equivalent or better performance than the state-of-the-art for both prompt classification and explainability, both in-domain and out-of-domain on three datasets, despite the fact that its model size is considerably smaller than current approaches.

Abstract:
Evolution, the engine behind the survival and growth of life on Earth, operates through the population-based process of reproduction. Inspired by this principle, this paper formally defines a newly emerging problem: the population-based evolution of large language models (LLMs). We introduce a novel framework that starts with a population of parent LLMs and allows this population to evolve through four key operations: (i) crossover, merging the weights of different parents to create offspring LLMs, (ii) mutation, introducing small, random changes to model weights to foster diversity, (iii) selection, prioritizing high-performing models, and (iv) succession, transferring the learned experience from parent to offspring LLMs. With only 200 samples per new task, the LLM population evolves rapidly to adapt to the task at hand, without any gradients. Experiments on 12 datasets show that our framework consistently outperforms existing multi-LLM merging and adaptation methods, achieving relative performance gains of up to 54.8 over the best LLM in the initial population. Moreover, our framework allows for (i) the evolution of LLMs across multiple new tasks simultaneously, (ii) scaling effectively with populations of up to 40 LLMs, and (iii) even zero-shot generalization to unseen held-out tasks. Code: https://github.com/ZhangYiqun018/GENOME

Abstract:
Multimodal Process Reward Models (MPRMs) have emerged as a pivotal framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, the research community currently lacks a dedicated benchmark to rigorously assess the error discernment capabilities of these models.To address this gap, we introduce PRMBench-V, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MPRMs’ proficiency in detecting erroneous reasoning steps across diverse error categories. Leveraging a semi-automated annotation pipeline augmented with human verification, we construct a comprehensive dataset comprising 907 unique queries, each annotated with nine distinct error types, resulting in 8,163 test cases with fine-grained step-level error labels.Through extensive experiments involving over 15 open- and closed-source models, we uncover several key findings: (1) even the strongest existing MPRMs achieve only \textasciitilde 30% accuracy in error identification; (2) while partial error detection achieves moderate precision and recall ( \textasciitilde 60% ), overall accuracy remains low ( \textasciitilde 20% ); and (3) benchmark scores exhibit a strong correlation with downstream task performance gains (r=0.86). Furthermore, we demonstrate that PRMBench-V can inform the development of more robust MPRMs: by introducing the Bayesian Rater Reliability Process Reward Model (BR2-PRM), we achieve up to a 4.8% performance improvement through test-time scaling.We believe that PRMBench-V will serve as a valuable resource for advancing MPRM research, enabling more rigorous evaluation and fostering the development of models with fine-grained multimodal reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
Parallel test-time scaling (TTS) is a pivotal approach for enhancing large language models (LLMs), typically by sampling multiple token-based chains-of-thought in parallel and aggregating outcomes through voting or search. Recent advances in latent reasoning, where intermediate reasoning unfolds in continuous vector spaces, offer a more efficient alternative to explicit Chain-of-Thought, yet whether such latent models can similarly benefit from parallel TTS remains open, mainly due to the absence of sampling mechanisms in continuous space, and the lack of probabilistic signals for advanced trajectory aggregation. This work enables parallel TTS for latent reasoning models by addressing the above issues. For sampling, we introduce two uncertainty-inspired stochastic strategies: Monte Carlo Dropout and Additive Gaussian Noise. For aggregation, we design a Latent Reward Model (LatentRM) trained with step-wise contrastive objective to score and guide latent reasoning. Extensive experiments and visualization analyses show that both sampling strategies scale effectively with compute and exhibit distinct exploration dynamics, while LatentRM enables effective trajectory selection. Together, our explorations open a new direction for scalable inference in continuous spaces. Code and checkpoint are included as supplementary materials.GitHub Project: https://github.com/ModalityDance/LatentTTS

Abstract:
Fine-grained emotion classification (FEC) requires distinguishing subtly different emotions, where the dominant errors come from closely confusable categories. Recent progress relies on contrastive learning with hard-pair mining, implicitly assuming that a fixed similarity metric is sufficient to optimize informative pairs. We argue that this assumption is fragile because defining whether two utterances are similar becomes a problem when the label space is crowded, and hard-pair mining under a fixed metric can systematically miss the worst confusions. Thus, we treat the similarity function as a learnable component and design an adversarial metric learning (AML) framework. It follows theoretical interpretations of metric-robust representations that better separate confusable emotions. AML trains a pairwise discriminator to maximally confuse two targeted hard pair types, while training the encoder to remain discriminative under this worst-case learned metric. Our code and data are released on GitHub.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation needs generation to follow retrieved evidence across shifting domains and prompt layouts, but training a new stronger model per task is costly. To this end, we propose GRAD, an adaptive decoding-time framework that keeps the base generator fixed and composes small, objective-specific guidance at inference. A key advantage of this design is enabling mix and match diverse RAG objectives: model scaling (MS), domain adaptation (DA) and positional debiasing (DB) can be integrated as token-level guidance terms, and new objectives can be easily plugged in. Across public benchmarks and private settings with no in-domain labels, GRAD improves accuracy with favorable latency, offering strong trade-offs versus scaling while reliably activating helpful objectives and suppressing harmful ones, adaptively to tasks.

Abstract:
Human–AI collaboration in knowledge-intensive tasks such as fact-checking requires understanding model uncertainty in multi-document reasoning amid conflicting/agreeing evidence. Yet, existing methods only express uncertainty as numbers or hedges without revealing which evidence conflicts cause the uncertainty, leaving users unable to resolve disagreements. We present CLUE (Conflict- Agreement-aware Language-model Uncertainty Explanations), a plug-and-play white-box framework that, to our knowledge, is the first to generate natural-language explanations of model uncertainty grounded in conflicting/agreeing evidence. CLUE (i) identifies span-level claim–evidence and inter-evidence relations that signal conflict or agreement without supervision, and (ii) uses these relations to steer explanation generation, articulating how they drive the model’s uncertainty. Across three language models and two fact-checking datasets, CLUE produces explanations that more faithfully track model uncertainty and better align with the model’s fact-checking decisions than span-agnostic explanation prompting; human raters also judge them more helpful, more informative, less redundant, and more logically consistent with the input. By explicitly tying uncertainty to evidence conflicts and agreements, CLUE supports practical fact-checking and other tasks that require reasoning over complex, conflicting information.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance rapidly, reliable governance tools have become critical. Publicly verifiable watermarking is particularly essential for fostering a trustworthy AI ecosystem. A central challenge persists: balancing text quality against detection robustness. Recent studies have sought to navigate this trade-off by leveraging signals from model output distributions (e.g., token-level entropy); however, their reliance on these model-specific signals presents a significant barrier to public verification, as the detection process requires access to the logits of the underlying model. We introduce STELA, a novel framework that aligns watermark strength with the linguistic degrees of freedom inherent in language. STELA dynamically modulates the signal using part-of-speech (POS) n-gram–modeled linguistic indeterminacy, weakening it in grammatically constrained contexts to preserve quality and strengthening it in contexts with greater linguistic flexibility to enhance detectability. Our detector operates without access to any model logits, thus facilitating publicly verifiable detection. Through extensive experiments on typologically diverse languages—analytic English, isolating Chinese, and agglutinative Korean—we show that STELA surpasses prior methods in detection robustness. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shinwoo-Park/stela_watermark.

Abstract:
Coreference resolution is typically evaluated using aggregate statistical metrics such as CoNLL-F1, which measure structural overlap between predicted and gold clusters. While widely used, these metrics offer limited diagnostic insights, penalizing errors without revealing whether a system struggles with specific semantic categories, such as people, locations, or events, and making it difficult to interpret model capabilities or derive actionable improvements. We address this gap by introducing a semantically-enhanced evaluation framework for coreference resolution. Our approach overlays Concept and Named Entity Recognition (CNER) onto coreference outputs, assigning semantic labels to nominal mentions and propagating them to entire coreference clusters. This enables the computation of typed scores aimed at evaluating mention extraction and linking capabilities stratified by semantic class. Across our experiments on OntoNotes, LitBank, and PreCo, we show that our framework uncovers systematic weaknesses that remain obscured by aggregate metrics. Furthermore, we show that these diagnostics can be used to design targeted, low-cost data augmentation strategies, achieving measurable out-of-domain improvements.

Abstract:
Language models are increasingly deployed in interactive settings where users reason about facts over time rather than in isolation.In such scenarios, correct behavior requires models to maintain and update implicit temporal assumptions established earlier in a conversation. We study this challenge through the lens of temporal scope stability: the ability to preserve, override, or transfer time-scoped factual context across dialogue turns. We introduce ChronoScope, a large-scale diagnostic benchmark designed to isolate temporal scope behavior in controlled multi-turn interactions, comprising over one million deterministically generated question chains grounded in Wikidata. ChronoScope evaluates whether models can correctly retain inferred temporal scope when follow-up questions omit explicit time references, spanning implicit carryover, explicit scope switching, cross-entity transfer, and longer temporal trajectories.Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art language models, we find that temporal scope stability is frequently violated in controlled multi-turn settings, with models often drifting toward present-day assumptions despite correct underlying knowledge.These failures intensify with interaction length and persist even under oracle context conditions, revealing a gap between single-turn factual accuracy and coherent temporal reasoning under sequential interaction.We make our dataset and evaluation suite publicly available at https://github.com/yashkumaratri/ChronoScope .

Abstract:
Data selection is a critical aspect of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Current data selection methods are largely heuristic-based, lacking theoretical guarantees and generalizability. This work proposes a theoretically-grounded approach using influence functions to estimate the contribution of each data point to the learning objective. To overcome the prohibitive computational cost of policy rollouts required for online influence estimation, we introduce an off-policy influence estimation method that efficiently approximates data influence using pre-collected offline trajectories. Furthermore, to manage the high-dimensional gradients of LLMs, we employ sparse random projection to reduce dimensionality and improve storage and computation efficiency. Leveraging these techniques, we develop Curriculum RL with Off-Policy Influence guidance (CROPI), a multi-stage RL framework that iteratively selects the most influential data for the current policy. Experiments on models up to 7B parameters demonstrate that CROPI significantly accelerates training. On a 1.5B model, it achieves a 2.66x step-level acceleration while using only 10% of the data per stage compared to full-dataset training. Our results highlight the substantial potential of influence-based data selection for efficient RLVR.

Abstract:
The Subregular Hypothesis posits that phonological patterns in natural languages occupy a restricted region of the formal language hierarchy, yet the cognitive basis for this restriction remains unclear. We propose an information-theoretic characterization: Strictly Local languages, when formalized as shifts of finite type, are exactly those admitting stationary Markov sources, which exhibit zero conditional mutual information between distant positions given intervening symbols. We prove that certain non-subregular patterns such as first-last assimilation admit no such Markov realization, explaining their unlearnability. Empirical validation on English phonotactics versus Finnish, Turkish, and Hungarian vowel harmony confirms that MI profiles statistically distinguish SL-like from TSL-like patterns ( p < 0.001 , r = 0.84 ). This work bridges formal language theory and information theory, offering a unified framework for understanding computational restrictions on natural language phonology.

Abstract:
Dynamic reasoning trees can help large language models solve complex tasks by explicitly structuring intermediate decisions.However, existing approaches often rely on manually specified subproblems or predefined decomposition patterns, which limits the effectiveness of reasoning and generalization.To solve this problem, we propose SyRA, a hierarchical reasoning framework based on MFR theory that supports the construction of adaptive reasoning trees and reliable error correction within a single LLM. Specifically, SyRA focuses on reasoning-tree construction, dynamically controlling branching and expansion using MFR principles to enable informative, non-redundant subproblem decomposition. In addition, it introduces a residual backtracking mechanism for adaptive cross-layer error correction, allowing the model to revise earlier reasoning decisions based on downstream feedback.Across eight reasoning benchmarks, SyRA significantly reduces logical errors and improves reasoning accuracy, while achieving a better balance between accuracy and reasoning time than the Chain-of-Thought, Decompose–Analyze–Rethink and Tree-of-Thought. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Tim798-art/SyRA/tree/main/SyRA.

Abstract:
Disinformation is an escalating global threat, making it essential to understand its content, dissemination, and evolution. To confront this challenge, researchers have begun grouping related false claims into broader disinformation narratives, which can be tracked across cultures, time periods, and media sources. Analyzing these narratives provides critical insights for developing more effective countermeasures. To this end, we introduce DiNO: Disinformation Narrative Observer, a novel method designed to extract disinformation narratives from news articles. We applied DiNO to news articles on the Ukraine War, COVID-19 and Migration, sourced from disinformation-prone outlets as well as a reputable source. We evaluated the narratives extracted by DiNO by measuring how well their topics and stances aligned with a recognized disinformation narratives dataset. DiNO outperforms competitive narrative mining approaches, including Relatio and CaNarEx, achieving a 41%–44% improvement in topical alignment and a 30%–41% improvment in stance alignment.

Abstract:
As large language models continue to advance, ensuring their trustworthiness is critical. However, inaccessible real-world ground truth labels pose a significant challenge in high-stakes domains. Recent studies have highlighted weak-to-strong generalization, where a strong model trained only on a weak model’s labels surpasses the weak model in task performance. Yet, whether critical trustworthiness properties such as robustness, fairness, and privacy can generalize similarly remains an open question. This is the first work to study this question by examining if a stronger model can enhance trustworthiness when fine-tuned on a weaker model’s labels, a paradigm we term weak-to-strong trustworthiness. To address this, we introduce two fundamental fine-tuning strategies that leverage trustworthiness regularization during the fine-tuning of the weak model and the weak-to-strong transfer. Our experimental evaluation on real-world datasets reveals that while some trustworthiness properties, such as fairness, adversarial robustness, and OOD robustness, show significant improvement in trustworthiness generalization when both models were regularized, others, like privacy, do not exhibit signs of weak-to-strong trustworthiness. Our results highlight the potential of weak-to-strong trustworthiness as a practical pathway for enhancing the trustworthiness of increasingly capable AI systems, even under imperfect real-world conditions.

Abstract:
Many approaches to LLM red-teaming leverage an attacker LLM to discover jailbreaks against a target. Several of them task the attacker with identifying effective strategies through trial and error, resulting in a semantically limited range of successes. Another approach discovers diverse attacks by combining crowdsourced harmful queries and tactics into instructions for the attacker, but does so at random, limiting effectiveness. This article introduces a novel framework, Adaptive Instruction Composition, that combines crowdsourced texts according to an adaptive mechanism trained to jointly optimize effectiveness with diversity. We use reinforcement learning to balance exploration with exploitation in a combinatorial space of instructions to guide the attacker toward diverse generations tailored to target vulnerabilities. We demonstrate that our approach substantially outperforms random combination on a set of effectiveness and diversity metrics, even under model transfer. Further, we show that it surpasses a host of recent adaptive approaches on Harmbench. We employ a lightweight neural contextual bandit that adapts to contrastive embedding inputs, and provide ablations suggesting that the contrastive pretraining enables the network to rapidly generalize and scale to the massive space as it learns.

Abstract:
Complex reasoning with Large Language Models (LLMs) demands a careful balance between accuracy and computational cost. Verification is crucial for reliability but faces trade-off: robust process-based verifiers are computationally prohibitive, while fast verifiers lack precision. We introduce flexive, a unified generative verifier designed to navigate this trade-off by dynamically allocating compute between rapid fast thinking and deliberative slow thinking. A key innovation is our training strategy: we use Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to specifically enhance the reliability of the fast mode. This targeted training generalizes effectively, elevating the slow mode to state-of-the-art open-source performance. To deploy flexive, we propose the solve-detect-verify (SDV) pipeline. Moving beyond static Best-of-N ranking, SDV employs an iterative refinement process that utilizes likelihood-based probing to detect solution completion, curtailing overthinking, and leverages flexive’s feedback for targeted correction. Solve-detect-verify establishes a new open-source state-of-the-art on ProcessBench, outperforming GenPRM-32B while requiring ~2.3x fewer TFLOPS and 15x less training data. On AIME 2024, the full SDV pipeline achieves 83.3% accuracy, surpassing strong baselines while using significantly fewer tokens.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a crucial technique for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, existing RLHF methods face key challenges, including poor sample efficiency, high computational overhead, and slow convergence. Recent studies highlight the importance of data selection in RL, but how to effectively select the most beneficial experiences for RL training remains an open problem. Existing data selection methods for RL rely on heuristic metrics, failing to establish an interpretable connection between data and optimization objectives. To address this problem, we propose InfOES (Influence-based Online Experience Selection), a novel data selection method for RLHF that dynamically estimates the influence of individual training samples on policy optimization. By incorporating data attribution into the policy gradient, InfOES can identify and filter out detrimental samples on the fly, ensuring effective convergence toward alignment objectives. Our approach is compatible with various RL algorithms (e.g., PPO, GRPO, REINFORCE++). Extensive experiments demonstrate that InfOES significantly enhances training effectiveness, achieving superior alignment performance with fewer optimization steps.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning of large language models (LLMs). Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based extensions improve upon vanilla RLVR (e.g., GRPO) by providing tree-based reasoning rollouts that enable fine-grained and segment-level credit assignment. However, existing methods still suffer from limited exploration diversity and inefficient reasoning. To address the above challenges, we propose reinforced efficient reasoning via semantically diverse explorations, i.e., ROSE, for LLMs. To encourage more diverse reasoning exploration, our method incorporates a semantic-entropy-based branching strategy and an 𝜀 -exploration mechanism. The former operates on already sampled reasoning rollouts to capture semantic uncertainty and select branching points with high semantic divergence to generate new successive reasoning paths, whereas the latter stochastically initiates reasoning rollouts from the root, preventing the search process from becoming overly local. To improve efficiency, we design a length-aware segment-level advantage estimator that rewards concise and correct reasoning while penalizing unnecessarily long reasoning chains. Extensive experiments on various mathematical reasoning benchmarks with Qwen and Llama models validate the effectiveness and efficiency of ROSE. Codes are available at https://github.com/ZiqiZhao1/ROSE-rl.

Abstract:
Existing multilingual embedding models often encounter challenges in cross-lingual scenarios due to imbalanced linguistic resources and less consideration of cross-lingual alignment during training. Although standardized contrastive learning approaches for cross-lingual adaptation are widely adopted, they may struggle to capture fundamental alignment between languages and degrade performance in well-aligned languages such as English. To address these challenges, we propose Cross-Lingual Enhancement in RetrievAl via Reverse-training (CLEAR), a novel loss function utilizing a reverse training scheme to improve retrieval performance across diverse cross-lingual retrieval scenarios. CLEAR leverages an English passage as a bridge to strengthen alignments between the target language and English, ensuring robust performance in the cross-lingual retrieval task. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that CLEAR achieves notable improvements in cross-lingual scenarios, with gains up to 15%, particularly in low-resource languages, while minimizing performance degradation in English. Furthermore, our findings highlight that CLEAR offers promising effectiveness even in multilingual training, suggesting its potential for broad application and scalability. We release the code at https://github.com/dltmddbs100/CLEAR.

Abstract:
We introduce SLR, an end-to-end framework for systematic evaluation and training of Large Language Models (LLMs) via Scalable Logical Reasoning. Given a user’s task specification, SLR automatically synthesizes (i) an instruction prompt for an inductive reasoning task, (ii) a validation program, executable on model outputs to provide verifiable rewards, and (iii) the latent ground-truth rule. This process is fully automated, scalable, requires no human annotations, and offers precise control over task difficulty. Using SLR, we create SLR-Bench, a benchmark comprising 19k prompts organized into 20 curriculum levels that progressively increase in relational, arithmetic, and recursive complexity. Large-scale evaluation reveals that contemporary LLMs readily produce syntactically valid rules, yet often fail at correct logical inference. Recent reasoning LLMs demonstrate improved performance but incur very high test-time computation, with costs exceeding 300 for just 1,000 prompts. Finally, curriculum learning via SLR doubles Llama-3-8B accuracy on SLR-Bench, achieving parity with Gemini-Flash-Thinking at a fraction of computational cost. Moreover, these reasoning capabilities generalize to a wide range of established benchmarks, underscoring the effectiveness of SLR for downstream reasoning.

Abstract:
Earlier Sign Language Production (SLP) models typically relied on autoregressive methods that generate output tokens one by one, which inherently provide temporal alignment. Although techniques like Teacher Forcing can prevent model collapse during training, they still cannot solve the problem of error accumulation during inference, since ground truth is unavailable at that stage. In contrast, more recent approaches based on diffusion models leverage step-by-step denoising to enable high-quality generation. However, the iterative nature of these models and the requirement to denoise entire sequences limit their applicability in real-time tasks like SLP. To address it, we propose a hybrid autoregressive-diffusion model for Sign Language Production (SLP), combining sequential dependency modeling with iterative refinement. A Multi-Scale Pose Representation module captures fine-grained articulator features, while a Confidence-Aware Causal Attention mechanism guides generation using joint-level confidence scores. Experiments on PHOENIX14T and How2Sign show improved generation quality and real-time efficiency.

Abstract:
We propose a novel data synthesis framework, DecIF, which automatically generates accurate and diverse instruction-following data from scratch for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), leveraging large language models (LLMs) and minimal external resources. By decomposing the data synthesis pipeline into fine-grained steps, DecIF achieves meticulous quality and diversity control over generated instruction-following data. Extensive experiments across both SFT and RL demonstrate DecIF’s strong capability to flexibly synthesize accurate instruction-following data for both paradigms compared to comprehensive baselines. Further analysis demonstrates the framework’s robustness, scalability, and computational efficiency in instruction-following data generation, while its modular design ensures straightforward implementation and reproducibility.

Abstract:
Linguistic steganography involves embedding secret messages within seemingly innocuous texts to enable covert communication. Provable security, which is a long-standing goal and key motivation, has been extended to language-model-based steganography. Previous provably secure approaches have achieved perfect imperceptibility, measured by zero Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, but at the expense of embedding capacity. In this paper, we attempt to directly use a classic entropy coding method (range coding) to achieve secure steganography, and then propose an efficient and provably secure linguistic steganographic method with a rotation mechanism. Experiments across various language models show that our method achieves around 100% entropy utilization (embedding efficiency) for embedding capacity, outperforming the existing baseline methods. Moreover, it achieves high embedding speeds (up to 1554.66 bits/s on GPT-2). The code is available at github.com/ryehr/RRC_steganography.

Abstract:
Recent theoretical advancement of information density in natural language has brought the following question on desk: To what degree does natural language exhibit periodicity pattern in its encoded information? We address this question by introducing a new method called AutoPeriod of Surprisal (APS). APS adopts a canonical periodicity detection algorithm and is able to identify any significant periods that exist in the surprisal sequence of a single document. By applying the algorithm to a set of corpora, we have obtained the following interesting results: Firstly, a considerable proportion of human language demonstrates a strong pattern of periodicity in information; Secondly, new periods that are outside the distributions of typical structural units in text (e.g., sentence boundaries, elementary discourse units, etc.) are found and further confirmed via harmonic regression modeling. We conclude that the periodicity of information in language is a joint outcome from both structured factors and other driving factors that take effect at longer distances. The advantages of our periodicity detection method and its potentials in LLM-generation detection are further discussed.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning and multi-turn interactions but struggle to continuously improve and adapt when deployed in new environments. One promising approach is implementing skill libraries that allow agents to learn, validate, and apply new skills. However, current skill library approaches rely primarily on LLM prompting, making consistent skill library implementation challenging. To overcome these challenges, we propose a Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based approach to enhance agents’ self-improvement capabilities with a skill library. Specifically, we introduce Skill Augmented GRPO for self-Evolution (SAGE), a novel RL framework that systematically incorporates skills into learning. The framework’s key component, Sequential Rollout, iteratively deploys agents across a chain of similar tasks for each rollout. As agents navigate through the task chain, skills generated from previous tasks accumulate in the library and become available for subsequent tasks. Additionally, the framework enhances skill generation and utilization through a Skill-integrated Reward that complements the original outcome-based rewards. Experimental results on AppWorld demonstrate that SAGE, when applied to supervised-finetuned model with expert experience, achieves 8.9% higher Scenario Goal Completion while requiring 26% fewer interaction steps and generating 59% fewer tokens, substantially outperforming existing approaches in both accuracy and efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/amazon-science/SAGE.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, the need to selectively remove unwanted knowledge while preserving model utility has become paramount. Recent work has explored sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to perform precise interventions on monosemantic features. However, most SAE-based methods operate at inference time, which does not create persistent changes in the model’s parameters. Such interventions can be bypassed or reversed by malicious actors with parameter access. We introduce CRISP, a parameter-efficient method for persistent concept unlearning using SAEs. CRISP automatically identifies salient SAE features across multiple layers and suppresses their activations. We experiment with two LLMs and show that our method outperforms prior approaches on safety-critical unlearning tasks from the WMDP benchmark, successfully removing harmful knowledge while preserving general and in-domain capabilities. Feature-level analysis reveals that CRISP achieves semantically coherent separation between target and benign concepts, allowing precise suppression of the target features.

Abstract:
Large vision–language models (VLMs) commonly process images at native or high resolution to remain effective across tasks. This inflates visual tokens to 97-99% of total tokens, resulting in high compute and latency, even when low-resolution images would suffice. We introduce CARES —a C ontext- A ware R esolution S elector, a lightweight preprocessing module that, given an image–query pair, predicts the minimal sufficient input resolution. CARES uses a compact VLM (350M) to extract features and predict when a target pretrained VLM’s response converges to its peak ability to answer correctly. Though trained as a discrete classifier over a set of optional resolutions, CARES interpolates continuous resolutions at inference for fine-grained control. Across five multimodal benchmarks spanning documents and natural images, as well as diverse target VLMs, CARES preserves task performance while reducing compute by up to 80%.

Abstract:
Anthropomorphism, or the attribution of human traits to technology, is an automatic and unconscious response that occurs even in those with advanced technical expertise. In this position paper, we analyze hundreds of thousands of research articles to present empirical evidence of the prevalence and growth of anthropomorphic terminology in research on large language models (LLMs). We argue for challenging the deeper assumptions reflected in this terminology — which, though often useful, may inadvertently constrain LLM development — and broadening beyond them to open new pathways for understanding and improving LLMs. Specifically, we identify and examine five anthropomorphic assumptions that shape research across the LLM development lifecycle. For each assumption (e.g., that LLMs must use natural language for reasoning, or that they should be evaluated on benchmarks originally meant for humans), we demonstrate empirical, non-anthropomorphic alternatives that remain under-explored yet offer promising directions for LLM research and development.

Abstract:
The critical therapist shortage demands scalable training solutions. Standardized Patients, the gold standard, are scarce and costly. Current LLM-based approaches focus on patient simulation for conversational realism but lack pedagogical rigor as Virtual Standardized Patients, lacking faithful reactions to clinical errors and explainable feedback. To bridge this gap, we propose PUPPET, the first neural-symbolic Virtual Standardized Patient governed by an OBSERVE-THINK-BEHAVE architecture. PUPPET externalizes LLM reasoning into a symbolic system where experts implant causal associations between intervention logic (propositional logic) and patient mental states (state machine). This allows PUPPET to behave coherently with controllable and explainable psychological dynamics: intervention logic (OBSERVE) → state transition (THINK) → response (BEHAVE). Our PUPPET-TRAINER further leverages this chain to educate trainees about intervention consequences, standardizing and scaling mental health training. Experiments across three clinical scenarios confirm that PUPPET outperforms baselines in clinical faithfulness and pedagogical value.

Abstract:
Open-Domain Table Question Answering (TQA) involves retrieving relevant tables from a large corpus to answer natural language queries. Traditional dense retrieval models, such as DTR and DPR, not only incur high computational costs for large-scale retrieval tasks but also require retraining or fine-tuning on new datasets, limiting their adaptability to evolving domains and knowledge. In this work, we propose CRAFT, a zero-shot, cascaded retrieval approach that first uses a sparse retrieval model to filter a subset of candidate tables before applying more computationally expensive dense models as re-rankers.To improve retrieval quality, we enrich table representations with descriptive titles and summaries generated by Gemini Flash 1.5, enabling richer semantic matching between queries and tabular structures. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) sparse, dense, and hybrid retrievers on the NQ-Tables dataset. It also demonstrates strong zero-shot performance on the more challenging OTT-QA benchmark, achieving competitive results at higher recall thresholds, where the task requires multi-hop reasoning across both textual passages and relational tables.This work establishes a scalable and adaptable paradigm for table retrieval, bridging the gap between fine-tuned architectures and lightweight, plug-and-play retrieval systems. Code and data are available at: [https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/CRAFT/](https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/CRAFT/)

Abstract:
A common goal in analyzing time series data is to understand how events cause observed variations. We study whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can infer natural language events associated with time series data.We introduce an automated method for generating tasks that test a model’s ability to reason about events associated with time series data based on sports data, and develop a new benchmarking method. In experiments spanning 18 LLMs, we prompt LLMs to infer unobserved events given time series data and observe surprising successes, even when providing minimal context. We then show that combining distillation with Reinforcement Learning (RL) can improve the performance for small language models to approach that of large proprietary reasoning models. All resources needed to reproduce our work are available: https://github.com/hartvigsen-group/GAMETime.

Abstract:
Autonomous machine learning agents have revolutionized scientific discovery, yet they remain constrained by a Generate-Execute-Feedback paradigm. Previous approaches suffers from a severe Execution Bottleneck, as hypothesis evaluation relies strictly on expensive physical execution. To bypass these physical constraints, we internalize execution priors to substitute costly runtime checks with instantaneous predictive reasoning, drawing inspiration from World Models. In this work, we formalize the task of Data-centric Solution Preference and construct a comprehensive corpus of 18,438 pairwise comparisons. We demonstrate that LLMs exhibit significant predictive capabilities when primed with a Verified Data Analysis Report, achieving 61.5% accuracy and robust confidence calibration. Finally, we instantiate this framework in ForeAgent, an agent that employs a Predict-then-Verify loop, achieving a 6x acceleration in convergence while surpassing execution-based baselines by +6%.

Abstract:
Vision-language models are increasingly employed as multimodal conversational agents (MCAs) for diverse conversational tasks. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has been widely explored for adapting MCAs to various human-AI interaction scenarios. Despite showing great enhancement in generalization performance, fine-tuning MCAs via RL still faces challenges in handling the extremely large text token space. To address this, we learn a compact latent action space for RL fine-tuning instead. Specifically, we adopt the learning from observation mechanism to construct the codebook for the latent action space, where future observations are leveraged to estimate current latent actions that could further be used to reconstruct future observations. However, the scarcity of paired image-text data hinders learning a codebook with sufficient coverage. Thus, we leverage both paired image-text data and text-only data to construct the latent action space, using a cross-modal projector for transforming text embeddings into image-text embeddings. We initialize the cross-modal projector on paired image-text data, and further train it on massive text-only data with a novel cycle consistency loss to enhance its robustness. We show that our latent action based method outperforms competitive baselines on two conversation tasks across various RL algorithms. Code and data are available at https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI/tree/main/MMLatentAction.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation is crucial for compressing Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling smaller student models to learn from larger teacher models. However, existing LLM distillation methods overly rely on student-generated outputs, which may introduce generation errors and misguide the distillation process. Moreover, existing distillation loss functions struggle to align the most informative part due to the complex output distributions of LLMs. To address these problems, we propose a multi-granularity semantic revision method for LLM distillation. At the sequence level, we propose a sequence correction and re-generation (SCRG) strategy. SCRG identifies error tokens by calculating the semantic cognitive difference between teacher and student outputs, corrects them using teacher-generated tokens, and re-generates the sequence to minimize errors. At the token level, we design a distribution adaptive clipping Kullback-Leibler (DAC-KL) loss, which uses a learnable sub-network to focus on semantically dense areas of the teacher’s output, reducing the impact of redundant information. At the span level, we utilize span priors to compute probability correlations within sequences, ensuring consistency between teacher and student outputs to enhance semantic information transfer. Extensive experiments on models ranging from 0.1B to 13B parameters demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods.

Abstract:
Lexical Relation Mining (LRM) aims to identify and classify lexical relations between word pairs. In this paper, we focus on two subtypes of LRM: Lexical Relation Classification (LRC) and Lexical Entailment (LE). Existing top-performing methods for them rely heavily on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) yet fail to distinguish nuanced lexical relations. From a linguistic perspective, intralexical tree-structured sememe information can reflect interlexical relations. Inspired by this, we are motivated to explore leveraging such structured knowledge to enhance LRC and LE. We first propose an automated Sememe Tree Construction (STC) pipeline to predict sememe trees; Then, we present the SememeLRM method to fully leverage structured sememe knowledge; Experimental results show that it achieves a notable 1.6% improvement on average across benchmarks, even outperforming Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods that contain 20 times more parameters on most benchmarks. Further results also suggest that sememe trees predicted by our pipeline can rival the gold-standard in HowNet, extending their applicability to lexico-semantic computing. Overall, this paper presents a potentially generalizable framework for leveraging complete sememe trees and makes significant progress, helping to unlock the value of such intralexical knowledge in downstream tasks.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at many multimodal tasks, yet they frequently struggle with tasks requiring precise understanding and handling of fine-grained visual elements. This is mainly due to information loss during image encoding or insufficient attention to critical regions. Recent work has shown promise by incorporating pixel-level visual information into the reasoning process, enabling VLMs to access high-resolution visual details during their thought process. However, this pixel-level information is often overused, leading to inefficiency and distraction from irrelevant visual details. To address these challenges, we propose the first framework for adaptive pixel reasoning that dynamically determines necessary pixel-level operations based on the input query. Specifically, we first apply operation-aware supervised fine-tuning to establish baseline competence in textual reasoning and visual operations, then design a novel rollout-guided reinforcement learning framework relying on feedback of the model’s own responses, which enables the VLM to determine when pixel operations should be invoked based on query difficulty. Experiments on extensive multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that our model achieves superior performance while significantly reducing unnecessary visual operations. Impressively, our model achieves 73.4% accuracy on HR-Bench 4K while maintaining a tool usage ratio of only 20.1%, improving accuracy and simultaneously reducing tool usage by 66.5% compared to the previous methods.

Abstract:
With the growing prevalence of generative AI, an increasing amount of content is no longer exclusively generated by humans but by generative AI models with human guidance. This shift presents notable challenges for the delineation of originality due to the varying degrees of human contribution in AI-assisted works. This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation and introduces a framework to address this question that is grounded in information theory. By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed measure effectively discriminates between varying degrees of human contribution across multiple creative domains. To further enhance real-world applicability, we extend the framework to estimate the minimal necessary human contribution for any text without requiring human input and validate its effectiveness. We hope that this work lays a foundation for measuring human contributions in AI-assisted content generation in the era of generative AI.

Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a training-free method for unsupervised short text clustering that relies less on careful selection of embedders than other methods. In customer-facing chatbots, companies are dealing with large amounts of user utterances that need to be clustered according to their intent. In these settings, no labeled data is typically available, and the number of clusters is not known. Recent approaches to short-text clustering in label-free settings incorporate LLM output to refine existing embeddings. While LLMs can identify similar texts effectively, the resulting similarities may not be directly represented by distances in the dense vector space, as they depend on the original embedding. We therefore propose a method for transforming LLM judgments directly into a bag-of-texts representation in which texts are initialized to be equidistant, without assuming any prior distance relationships. Our method achieves comparable or superior results to state-of-the-art methods, but without embeddings optimization or assuming prior knowledge of clusters or labels. Experiments on diverse datasets and smaller LLMs show that our method is model agnostic and can be applied to any embedder, with relatively small LLMs, and different clustering methods. We also show how our method scales to large datasets, reducing the computational cost of the LLM use. The flexibility and scalability of our method make it more aligned with real-world training-free scenarios than existing clustering methods.

Abstract:
This paper investigates the problem of safe decoding for Large Language Models (LLMs) during inference, particularly under jailbreak attacks. Previous approaches typically either detect malicious content or regulate the decoding alignment of LLMs to mitigate such attacks. Although effective in defending against attacks, these methods often over-reject benign content, limiting their generalizability in real-world scenarios where harmful and benign information coexist. Towards this end, we propose an innovative framework named Sequence-level risk Accumulation for calibrating test-time alignment (SEAT). Specifically, SEAT introduces a reward-guided branch decoding paradigm to incorporate safety awareness during generation. To balance the detection of harmful content with the accurate response to benign information, SEAT employs a sequence-level risk monitor that smooths risk signals over the entire sequence, preventing over-confident refusals for certain tokens. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments on four attack benchmarks and two neutral datasets, comparing SEAT with eight state-of-the-art baselines. Consequently, the results demonstrate that SEAT achieves superior performance both in defending against jailbreak attacks and in generating high-quality responses on neutral datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ShanwenTan/SEAT.

Abstract:
While Learned Data Compression (LDC) has achieved superior compression ratios, balancing precise probability modeling with system efficiency remains challenging. Crucially, uniform single-stream architectures struggle to simultaneously capture micro-syntactic and macro-semantic features, necessitating deep serial stacking that exacerbates latency. Compounding this, heterogeneous systems are constrained by device speed mismatches, where throughput is capped by Amdahl’s Law due to serial processing. To this end, we propose a Dual-Stream Multi-Scale Decoupler that disentangles local and global contexts to replace deep serial processing with shallow parallel streams, and incorporate a Hierarchical Gated Refiner for adaptive feature refinement and precise probability modeling. Furthermore, we design a Concurrent Stream-Parallel Pipeline, which overcomes systemic bottlenecks to achieve full-pipeline parallelism. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both compression ratio and throughput, while maintaining the lowest latency and memory usage. The code is available at https://github.com/huidong-ma/FADE.

Abstract:
In real-world Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) scenarios, a major source of inefficiency is that the toolcalls create pauses between LLM requests and cause KV-cache eviction. Also, the long, unfiltered response returned by external tools inflates the KV-cache, so each decode step spends more time loading the growing cache and thus becomes steadily slower as context length increases. However, existing efficiency metrics like token counts and toolcall counts fail to capture this real computational cost. To address this, we introduce PTE (Prefill Token Equivalents), a hardware-aware TIR-efficiency metric that unifies internal reasoning and external tool-use costs while explicitly accounting for non-reusable KV-Cache and long-tool-response scenarios, thus better reflects real-world scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments across five TIR benchmarks, quantify their PTE costs, and identify four inefficiency patterns that appear in TIR. In a simulated high-concurrency industrial setting, PTE explains wall-clock latency significantly better than token-count metric. We also discover that trajectories with higher PTE costs tend to have lower reasoning correctness, indicating that simply using more tools does not improve the quality of the answer. PTE offers a new perspective on the efficiency of Tool-Integrated Reasoning. The code is available.

Abstract:
Tokenization is the first—and often least scrutinized—step of most NLP pipelines. Standard algorithms for learning tokenizers rely on frequency-based objectives, which favor languages dominant in the training data and consequently leave lower-resource languages with tokenizations that are disproportionately longer, morphologically implausible, or even riddled with placeholders. This phenomenon ultimately amplifies computational and financial inequalities between users from different language backgrounds. To remedy this, we introduce Parity-aware Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), a variant of the widely-used BPE algorithm. At every merge step, Parity-aware BPE applies a fair-max rule that maximizes the compression gain of the currently worst-compressed language, trading a small amount of global compression for cross-lingual parity. We find empirically that Parity-aware BPE reduces tokenization inequality—operationalized by the Gini coefficient of per-language token costs—by up to 89% relative to Classical BPE. This comes with negligible impact on global compression rate and no evidence of systematic degradation in downstream LM performance.

Abstract:
Video-guided Machine Translation (VMT) seeks to enhance translation quality by incorporating contextual information derived from paired short video clips. However, many VMT samples are text-sufficient; even when visual information is needed, only minimal cues are required. Aiming to tackle these issues, we propose a novel framework DART (Disambiguation-Aware Reasoning for Video-guided Machine Translation). Reinforcement learning is used to incorporate multimodal large language models’ multimodal reasoning into VMT. The model dynamically switches between text-only processing and multimodal integration, contingent on the necessity of visual disambiguation. Furthermore, we present TVRF (Translation-oriented Video Relevance Filtering), a systematic pipeline for constructing training data based on multimodal relevance to translation. This pipeline filters samples where video information is translation-relevant, mitigating training collapse caused by video-irrelevant data in conventional VMT. Experimental results show that our approach improves multimodal information utilization in VMT, yielding gains in both translation quality and computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Advanced LLMs have achieved near-ceiling instruction-following accuracy on benchmarks such as IFEval. However, these impressive scores do not necessarily translate to reliable services in real-world use, where users often vary their phrasing, contextual framing, and task formulations. In this paper, we study nuance-oriented reliability : whether models exhibit consistent competence across cousin prompts that convey analogous user intents but with subtle nuances. To quantify this, we introduce a new metric, reliable@k, and develop an automated pipeline that generates high-quality cousin prompts via data augmentation. Building upon this, we construct IFEval++ for systematic evaluation. Across 20 proprietary and 26 open-source LLMs, we find that current models exhibit substantial insufficiency in nuance-oriented reliability—their performance can drop by up to 61.8% with nuanced prompt modifications. What’s more, we characterize it and explore three potential improvement recipes. Our findings highlight nuance-oriented reliability as a crucial yet underexplored next step toward more dependable and trustworthy LLM behavior. Our code and benchmark are accessible: https://github.com/jianshuod/IFEval-pp.

Abstract:
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is central to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) in reasoning tasks with verifiable rewards. However, standard token-level PPO struggles in this setting due to the instability of temporal credit assignment over long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) horizons and the prohibitive memory cost of the value model. While critic-free alternatives like GRPO mitigate these issues, they incur significant computational overhead by requiring multiple samples for baseline estimation, severely limiting training throughput. In this paper, we introduce Sequence-Level PPO (SPPO), a scalable algorithm that harmonizes the sample efficiency of PPO with the stability of outcome-based updates. SPPO reformulates the reasoning process as a Sequence-Level Contextual Bandit problem, employing a decoupled scalar value function to derive low-variance advantage signals without multi-sampling. Extensive experiments on mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that SPPO significantly surpasses standard PPO and matches the performance of computation-heavy group-based methods, offering a resource-efficient framework for aligning reasoning LLMs.

Abstract:
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly revolutionized web search. The emergence of LLM-based Search Agents marks a pivotal shift towards deeper, dynamic, autonomous information seeking. These agents can comprehend user intentions and environment context and execute multi-turn retrieval with dynamic planning, extending search capabilities far beyond the web. Leading examples like OpenAI’s Deep Research highlight their potential for deep information mining and real-world applications. This survey provides the first systematic analysis of search agents. We comprehensively analyze and categorize existing works from the perspectives of architecture, optimization, application, and evaluation, ultimately identifying critical open challenges and outlining promising future research directions in this rapidly evolving field.

Abstract:
Visualizations play a pivotal role in daily communication in an increasingly data-driven world. Research on multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for automated chart understanding has accelerated massively, with steady improvements on standard benchmarks. However, for MLLMs to be reliable, they must be robust to misleading visualizations, i.e., charts that distort the underlying data, leading readers to draw inaccurate conclusions. Here, we uncover an important vulnerability: MLLM question-answering (QA) accuracy on misleading visualizations drops on average to the level of the random baseline. To address this, we provide the first comparison of six inference-time methods to improve QA performance on misleading visualizations, without compromising accuracy on non-misleading ones. We find that two methods, table-based QA and redrawing the visualization, are effective, with improvements of up to 19.6 percentage points. We make our code and data available.

Abstract:
Lifelong learning investigates how models adapt when exposed to a potentially infinite stream of data. Most conventional approaches focus on updating model parameters (i.e., the neural network weights) as the underlying data distribution evolves over time. However, in natural language processing, model parameters are not the only components that matter. The tokenizer, a foundational part of the system, is usually assumed to remain fixed in lifelong learning scenarios. In this work, we challenge the validity of this assumption: as language evolves, a static tokenizer fragments newly emerging lexical items, reducing compression efficiency and consequently degrading the model performance. We introduce the Temporal Drift Tokenizer (Ted-Tok), which maintains an evolving vocabulary that adapts to emerging linguistic patterns over time. This adaptivity is driven by time-weighted frequency estimators that smooth short-term fluctuations to capture persistent linguistic trends, and a principled addition-deletion strategy targeting sink tokens. Across multiple domains, Ted-Tok consistently improves compression and task performance, with gains increasing under stronger drift, underscoring the role of tokenizer adaptivity in lifelong learning.

Abstract:
Audio chaptering, the task of automatically segmenting long-form audio into coherent sections, is increasingly important for navigating podcasts, lectures, and videos. Despite its relevance, research remains limited and text-based, leaving key questions unresolved about leveraging audio information, handling ASR errors, and transcript-free evaluation. We address these gaps through three contributions: (1) a systematic comparison between text-based models with acoustic features, a novel audio-only architecture (AudioSeg) operating on learned audio representations, and multimodal LLMs; (2) empirical analysis of factors affecting performance, including transcript quality, acoustic features, duration, and speaker composition; and (3) formalized evaluation protocols contrasting transcript-dependent text-space protocols with transcript-invariant time-space protocols. Our experiments on YTSeg reveal that AudioSeg substantially outperforms text-based approaches, pauses provide the largest acoustic gains, and current MLLMs struggle due to context limitations and weak instruction following.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance through extended inference-time deliberation, yet how their reasoning failures arise remains poorly understood. By analyzing model-generated reasoning trajectories, we find that errors are not uniformly distributed but often originate from a small number of early transition points, after which reasoning remains locally coherent but globally incorrect. These transitions coincide with localized spikes in token-level entropy, and alternative continuations from the same intermediate state can still lead to correct solutions. Based on these observations, we introduce GUARD, a targeted inference-time framework that probes and redirects critical transitions using uncertainty signals. Empirical evaluations across multiple benchmarks confirm that interventions guided by these failure dynamics lead to more reliable reasoning outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of understanding when and how reasoning first deviates, complementing existing approaches that focus on scaling inference-time computation.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently hallucinate due to their reliance on fragile, linear reasoning and weak visual grounding. We propose Visual Attention Reasoning (VAR), a reinforcement learning framework that reformulates reasoning as a hierarchical search with self-verification. VAR enforces traceable evidence grounding by generating explicit bounding boxes, guided by a novel reward function combining geometric precision and semantic sufficiency. Furthermore, it replaces linear Chain-of-Thought with a tree-search policy capable of backtracking to correct logical errors. Theoretical analysis validates the framework’s reliability, and extensive experiments demonstrate that VAR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on complex hallucination and safety benchmarks.

Abstract:
Deep Research Agents generate analyst-grade reports, yet evaluating them remains challenging due to the absence of a single ground truth and the multidimensional nature of research quality. Recent benchmarks propose distinct methodologies, yet they suffer from the Mirage of Synthesis, where strong surface-level fluency and citation alignment can obscure underlying factual and reasoning defects. We characterize this gap by introducing a taxonomy across four verticals that exposes a critical capability mismatch: static evaluators inherently lack the tool-use capabilities required to assess temporal validity and factual correctness. To address this, we propose DREAM (Deep Research Evaluation with Agentic Metrics), a framework that instantiates the principle of capability parity by making evaluation itself agentic. DREAM structures assessment through an evaluation protocol combining query-agnostic metrics with adaptive metrics generated by a tool-calling agent, enabling temporally aware coverage, grounded verification, and systematic reasoning probes. Controlled evaluations demonstrate DREAM is significantly more sensitive to factual and temporal decay than existing benchmarks, offering a scalable, reference-free evaluation paradigm.

Abstract:
Enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to effectively utilize tools in multi-turn interactions is essential for building capable autonomous agents. However, acquiring diverse and realistic multi-turn tool-use data remains a significant challenge. In this work, we propose a novel text-based paradigm. We observe that textual corpora naturally contain rich, multi-step problem-solving experiences, which can serve as an untapped, scalable, and authentic data source for multi-turn tool-use tasks. Based on this insight, we introduce GEM, a data synthesis pipeline that enables the generation and extraction of multi-turn tool-use trajectories from text corpora through a four-stage process: relevance filtering, workflow tool extraction, trajectory grounding, and complexity refinement. To reduce the computational cost, we further train a specialized Trajectory Synthesizer via supervised fine-tuning. This model distills the complex generation pipeline into an efficient, end-to-end trajectory generator. Experiments demonstrate that our GEM-32B achieve a 14.9% improvement on the BFCL V3 Multi-turn benchmark. Our models partially surpass the performance of models trained on -bench (Airline and Retail) in-domain data, highlighting the superior generalization capability derived from our text-based synthesis paradigm. Notably, our Trajectory Synthesizer matches the quality of the full pipeline while significantly reducing inference latency and costs.

Abstract:
While Mamba has demonstrated strong performance in language modeling, its potential as a speech self-supervised learning (SSL) model remains underexplored, with prior studies limited to isolated tasks. To address this, we explore Mamba-based HuBERT models as alternatives to Transformer-based SSL architectures. Leveraging the linear-time Selective State Space, these models enable fine-tuning on long-context ASR with significantly lower compute. Moreover, they show superior performance when fine-tuned for streaming ASR. Beyond fine-tuning, these models show competitive performance on SUPERB probing benchmarks, particularly in causal settings. Our analysis shows that they yield higher-quality quantized representations and capture speaker-related features more distinctly than Transformer-based models. These findings highlight Mamba-based SSL as a promising and complementary direction for long-sequence modeling, real-time speech modeling, and speech unit extraction. The codebase is available at https://github.com/hckuo145/Mamba-based-HuBERT.

Abstract:
The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) on resource-constrained edge devices is increasingly hindered by prohibitive memory and computational requirements. While ternary quantization offers a compelling solution by reducing weights to -1, 0, +1 , current implementations suffer from a fundamental misalignment with commodity hardware. Most existing methods must choose between 2-bit aligned packing, which incurs significant bit wastage, or 1.67-bit irregular packing, which degrades inference speed. To resolve this tension, we propose Sherry, a hardware-efficient ternary quantization framework. Sherry introduces a 3:4 fine-grained sparsity that achieves a regularized 1.25-bit width by packing blocks of four weights into five bits, restoring power-of-two alignment. Furthermore, we identify weight trapping issue in sparse ternary training, which leads to representational collapse. To address this, Sherry introduces Arenas, an annealing residual synapse mechanism that maintains representational diversity during training. Empirical evaluations on LLaMA-3.2 across five benchmarks demonstrate that Sherry matches state-of-the-art ternary performance while significantly reducing model size. Notably, on an Intel i7-14700HX CPU, our 1B model achieves zero accuracy loss compared to SOTA baselines while providing 25% bit savings and 10% speed up. The code is available at https://github.com/Tencent/AngelSlim.

Abstract:
Rubric-augmented verification guides reward models with explicit evaluation criteria, yielding more reliable judgments than single-model verification.However, most existing methods require costly rubric annotations, limiting scalability.Moreover, we find that rubric generation is vulnerable to a failure of cooperation; low-quality rubrics actively mislead reward models rather than help. Inspired by the principle of cooperative communication, we propose Cooperative yet Critical reward modeling (C2), a framework that significantly improves reward model judgments by having the reward model critically collaborate with a rubric generator trained solely from binary preferences.In C2, we synthesize helpful and misleading rubric pairs by measuring how each rubric shifts the reward model toward or away from the correct preference. Using these contrastive pairs, we train a cooperative rubric generator to propose helpful rubrics, and a critical verifier to assess rubric validity before making its judgment, following only rubrics it deems helpful at inference time. C2 outperforms reasoning reward models trained on the same binary preferences, with gains of up to 6.5 points on RM-Bench and 6.0 points length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0. Without external rubric annotations, C2 enables an 8B reward model to match performance achieved with rubrics from a 4 × larger model.Overall, our work demonstrates that eliciting deliberate cooperation in rubric-augmented verification makes reward models more trustworthy in a scalable way.

Abstract:
Discovering effective predictive signals, or “alphas,” from financial data with high dimensionality and extremely low signal-to-noise ratio remains a difficult open problem. Despite progress in deep learning, genetic programming, and, more recently, large language model (LLM)–based factor generation, existing approaches still explore only a narrow region of the vast alpha search space. Neural models tend to produce opaque and fragile patterns, while symbolic or formula-based methods often yield redundant or economically ungrounded expressions that generalize poorly. Although different in form, these paradigms share a key limitation: none can conduct broad, structured, and human-like exploration that balances logical consistency with creative leaps.To address this gap, we introduce the Cognitive Alpha Mining Framework (CogAlpha), which combines code-level alpha representation with LLM-driven reasoning and evolutionary search. Treating LLMs as adaptive cognitive agents, our framework iteratively refines, mutates, and recombines alpha candidates through multi-stage prompts and financial feedback. This synergistic design enables deeper thinking, richer structural diversity, and economically interpretable alpha discovery, while greatly expanding the effective search space.Experiments on 5 stock datasets from 3 stock markets demonstrate that CogAlpha consistently discovers alphas with superior predictive accuracy, robustness, and generalization over existing methods. Our results highlight the promise of aligning evolutionary optimization with LLM-based reasoning for automated and explainable alpha discovery.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in general multi-modal understanding; yet they struggle to efficiently acquire continually evolving domain-specific skills. Conventional approaches to enhancing VLM capabilities, such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), require extensive dataset curation and substantial computational resources. Model merging has emerged as an efficient alternative that enables the transfer of domain-specific expertise from Large Language Models (LLMs) to VLMs without incurring additional training data requirements or significant computational overhead. Unlike conventional merging of homogeneous LLMs, which mainly aggregates existing capabilities, cross-modal skill injection aims to induce emergent cross-modal capabilities by integrating a domain-expert LLM into a VLM. However, existing research lacks a systematic analysis of the applicability and methodology of cross-modal skill injection. In this study, we investigate cross-modal skill injection across three main aspects: scenarios, methods, and hyperparameters. For scenarios, we find that cross-modal skill injection generally performs well in instruction-following and cross-lingual settings, yet struggles with mathematical reasoning. For methods, we find that classic approaches such as TA and DARE consistently achieve superior performance over alternative merging methods. We also provide a systematic and quantitative analysis of the hyperparameter tuning that these classic methods critically depend on.

Abstract:
Although LLM agents can leverage tools for complex tasks, they still need memory to maintain cross-turn consistency and accumulate reusable information in long-horizon interactions. However, retrieval-based external memory systems incur low online overhead but suffer from unstable accuracy due to limited query construction and candidate filtering. In contrast, many systems use repeated large-model calls for online memory operations, improving accuracy but accumulating latency over long interactions. We propose LightMem, a lightweight memory system for better agent memory driven by Small Language Models (SLMs). LightMem modularizes memory retrieval, writing, and long-term consolidation, and separates online processing from offline consolidation to enable efficient memory invocation under bounded compute. We organize memory into short-term memory (STM) for immediate conversational context, mid-term memory (MTM) for reusable interaction summaries, and long-term memory (LTM) for consolidated knowledge, and uses user identifiers to support independent retrieval and incremental maintenance in multi-user settings. Online, LightMem operates under a fixed retrieval budget and selects memories via a two-stage procedure: vector-based coarse retrieval followed by semantic consistency re-ranking. Offline, it abstracts reusable interaction evidence and incrementally integrates it into LTM. Experiments show consistent gains across model scales, with an average F1 improvement of about 2.5 over A-MEM on LoCoMo, while achieving higher efficiency and low median latency (83 ms for retrieval and 581 ms end-to-end).

Abstract:
Legal judgment prediction serves as a pivotal task in intelligent judicial systems. Although large language models have achieved remarkable progress in general reasoning, they struggle with tasks that require fine-grained distinctions between similar charges. These models often select plausible charges directly without discriminating among closely related alternatives. In this paper, we introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that enables models to actively retrieve and apply external knowledge during decision-making. Unlike static prediction, GLARE simulates comparative reasoning by dynamically expanding the decision space to include confusing candidates, then retrieving exclusionary logic from precedents and statutes to identify the correct judgment. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our method significantly outperforms strong baselines, especially on complex cases involving confusing or rare charges. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GLARE-LJP-8EDF .

Abstract:
LLM-based code agents treat repositories as unstructured text, applying edits through brittle string matching that frequently fails due to formatting drift or ambiguous patterns. We propose reframing the codebase as a structured action space where agents operate on named AST entities rather than text spans. Our framework, CodeStruct, provides readCode for retrieving complete syntactic units and editCode for applying syntax-validated transformations to semantic program elements. Evaluated on SWE-Bench Verified across six LLMs, CodeStruct improves Pass@1 accuracy by 1.2-5.0% while reducing token consumption by 12-38% for most models. Models that frequently fail to produce valid patches under text-based interfaces benefit most: GPT-5-nano improves by 20.8% as empty-patch failures drop from 46.6% to 7.2%. On CodeAssistBench, we observe consistent accuracy gains (+0.8-4.4%) with cost reductions up to 33%. Our results show that structure-aware interfaces offer a more reliable foundation for code agents.

Abstract:
LLMs have been widely used in planning, either as planners to generate action sequences end-to-end, or as formalizers to represent the planning domain and problem in a formal language that can derive plans deterministically. However, both lines of work rely on standard benchmarks that include only generic and simplistic environmental specifications, leading to potential overestimation of the planning ability of LLMs and safety concerns in downstream tasks. We bridge this gap by augmenting widely used planning benchmarks with manually annotated, fine-grained, and rich natural language constraints spanning four formally defined categories. Over 4 state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs, 4 formal languages, and 4 datasets, we show that the introduction of one-sentence constraints consistently halves performance, indicating current LLMs’ lack of robustness and an avenue for future research.

Abstract:
Effective real-world human–agent interactions, such as household robotic services, are often long-term and repeated. Beyond executing tasks, agents are expected to quickly become familiar with individual users. In everyday use, people do not want to repeatedly specify precise instructions. Instead, they prefer agents that adapt to their habits and preferences over interaction while minimizing communication effort. This poses a key challenge: enabling agents to rapidly align with user needs and provide proactive assistance within limited communication. To study this problem in a realistic embodied setting, we first introduce HA-Desire, a home assistance simulation environment. HA-Desire features an LLM-driven proxy user with value-driven preferences and natural language behavior, enabling systematic evaluation of how agents adapt to users across interactions and satisfy their desires. We further propose FAMER, a framework that integrates goal-relevant memory, desire-centered mental reasoning, and efficient communication to infer user preferences from interaction while reducing unnecessary dialogue. Experiments across embodied household tasks and different LLMs show that FAMER improves both task success and interaction efficiency compared to existing baselines, highlighting the importance of communication-efficient desire alignment for proactive embodied agents that support users without requiring frequent instructions.

Abstract:
Though large language models (LLMs) have enabled great success across a wide variety of tasks, they still appear to fall short of one of the loftier goals of artificial intelligence research: creating an artificial system that can adapt its behavior to radically new contexts upon deployment. One important step towards this goal is to create systems that can induce rich representations of data that are seen in-context, and then flexibly deploy these representations to accomplish goals. Recently, Park et al. 2024 demonstrated that current LLMs are indeed capable of inducing such representation from context (i.e., in-context representation learning). The present study investigates whether LLMs can use these representations to complete simple downstream tasks.We first assess whether open-weights LLMs can use in-context representations for next-token prediction, and then probe models using a novel task, adaptive world modeling. In both tasks, we find evidence that open-weights LLMs struggle to deploy representations of novel semantics that are defined in-context, even if they encode these semantics in their latent representations. Furthermore, we assess closed-source, state-of-the-art reasoning models on the adaptive world modeling task, demonstrating that even the most performant LLMs cannot reliably leverage novel patterns presented in-context. Overall, this work seeks to inspire novel methods for encouraging models to not only encode information presented in-context, but to do so in a manner that supports flexible deployment of this information.

Abstract:
Geospatial reasoning is essential for real-world applications such as urban analytics, transportation planning, and disaster response. However, existing LLM-based agents often fail at genuine geospatial computation, relying instead on web search or pattern matching while hallucinating spatial relationships. We present Spatial-Agent, an AI agent grounded in foundational theories of spatial information science. Our approach formalizes geo-analytical question answering as a concept transformation problem, where natural-language questions are parsed into executable workflows represented as GeoFlow Graphs—directed acyclic graphs with nodes corresponding to spatial concepts and edges representing transformations. Drawing on spatial information theory, Spatial-Agent extracts spatial concepts, assigns functional roles with principled ordering constraints, and composes transformation sequences through template-based generation. Extensive experiments on MapEval-API and MapQA benchmarks demonstrate that Spatial-Agent significantly outperforms existing baselines including ReAct and Reflexion, while producing interpretable and executable geospatial workflows.

Abstract:
Verification is critical for improving agents: it provides the reward signal for Reinforcement Learning and enables inference-time gains through Test-Time Scaling (TTS). Despite its importance, verification in software engineering (SWE) agent settings often relies on code execution, which can be difficult to scale due to environment setup overhead. Scalable alternatives such as patch classifiers and heuristic methods exist, but they are less grounded in codebase context and harder to interpret. To this end, we explore Agentic Rubrics: an expert agent interacts with the repository to create a context-grounded rubric checklist, and candidate patches are then scored against it without requiring test execution. On SWE-Bench Verified under parallel TTS evaluation, Agentic Rubrics achieve a score of 54.2% on Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B and 40.6% on Qwen3-32B, with at least a +3.5 percentage-point gain over the strongest baseline in our comparison set. We further analyze rubric behavior, showing that rubric scores are consistent with ground-truth tests while also flagging issues that tests do not capture. Our ablations show that agentic context gathering is essential for producing codebase-specific, unambiguous criteria. Together, these results suggest that Agentic Rubrics provide an efficient, scalable, and granular verification signal for SWE agents.

Abstract:
Retrieving evidence for language model queries from knowledge graphs requires balancing broad search across the graph with multi-hop traversal to follow relational links. Similarity-based retrievers provide coverage but remain shallow, whereas traversal-based methods rely on selecting seed nodes to start exploration, which can fail when queries span multiple entities and relations. We introduce ARK: Adaptive Retriever of Knowledge, a tool-using KG retriever that gives a language model control over this breadth-depth tradeoff using a two-operation toolset: global lexical search over node descriptors and one-hop neighborhood exploration that composes into multi-hop traversal. ARK alternates between breadth-oriented discovery and depth-oriented expansion without depending on a fragile seed selection, a pre-set hop depth, or requiring retrieval training. ARK adapts tool use to queries, using global search for language-heavy queries and neighborhood exploration for relation-heavy queries.On STaRK, ARK reaches 59.1% average Hit@1 and 67.4 average MRR, improving average Hit@1 by up to 31.4% and average MRR by up to 28.0% over retrieval-based and agent-based training-free methods.Finally, we distill ARK’s tool-use trajectories from a large teacher into an 8B model via label-free imitation, improving Hit@1 by +7.0, +26.6, and +13.5 absolute points over the base 8B model on AMAZON, MAG, and PRIME datasets, respectively, while retaining up to 98.5% of the teacher’s Hit@1 rate.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have precipitated a dramatic improvement in the legal domain, yet the deployment of standalone models faces significant limitations regarding hallucination, outdated information, and verifiability. Recently, LLM agents have attracted significant attention as a solution to these challenges, utilizing advanced capabilities such as planning, memory, and tool usage to meet the rigorous standards of legal practice. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of LLM agents for legal tasks, analyzing how these architectures bridge the gap between technical capabilities and domain-specific needs. Our major contributions include: (1) systematically analyzing the technical transition from standard legal LLMs to legal agents; (2) presenting a structured taxonomy of current agent applications across distinct legal practice areas; (3) discussing evaluation methodologies specifically for agentic performance in law; and (4) identifying open challenges and outlining future directions for developing robust and autonomous legal assistants.

Abstract:
What statistical properties might support learning abstract grammatical knowledge from linear input? We address this question by examining the statistical distribution of function words. Function words have been argued to aid acquisition through three distributional properties: high frequency, reliable syntactic association, and phrase-boundary alignment. We conduct a cross-linguistic corpus analysis of 186 languages, which confirms that all three properties are universal. Using counterfactual language modeling and ablation experiments on English, we show that preserving these properties facilitates acquisition in neural learners, with a Goldilocks effect: function words must be frequent enough to be reliable, yet diverse enough to remain informative to structural dependency. Probing analyses further reveal that different learning conditions produce systematically different reliance on function words.

Abstract:
Severe acoustic degradation is often caused by overlapping noise, disfluencies, and environmental distortions. This phenomenon results in the dissolution of linguistic structures and the generation of unreliable ASR outputs. Inspired by human speech comprehension, we propose Speech-MLM, a novel multimodal framework that reframes ASR as semantics-guided speech reconstruction. This perspective introduces three core challenges: (C1) collapse of linguistic structure under acoustic degradation, (C2) semantic ambiguity under noise, and (C3) misalignment across modalities. To address these issues, we propose Speech-MLM, a multimodal ASR framework that integrates speech, spectrogram-derived visual cues, and textual variants to enhance robustness. It consists of: (i) Cognitive Structure Extractor that recovers prosodic structure from visualized acoustic features, (ii) Semantic Weaver that learns semantic equivalence across varied textual forms, and (iii) Retrieval-Guided Fusion Learner that unifies modalities within a shared semantic space. Experiments on multiple real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that Speech-MLM achieves an average 38.85% reduction in WER, while also attaining 98.71% BERTScore and 96.7% USE, over advanced baselines, demonstrating substantial gains in semantic robustness and generalization across domains.

Abstract:
Language model (LM) probability is not a reliable quality estimator, as natural language is ambiguous. When multiple output options are valid, the model’s probability distribution is spread across them, which can misleadingly indicate low output quality. This issue is caused by two reasons: (1) LMs’ final output activation is softmax, which does not allow multiple correct options to receive high probabilities simultaneuously and (2) LMs’ training data is single, one-hot encoded references, indicating that there is only one correct option at each output step. We propose training a module for Quality Estimation on top of pre-trained LMs to address these limitations. The module, called Sigmoid Head, is an extra unembedding head with sigmoid activation to tackle the first limitation. To tackle the second limitation, during the negative sampling process to train the Sigmoid Head, we use a heuristic to avoid selecting potentially alternative correct tokens. Our Sigmoid Head is computationally efficient during training and inference. The probability from Sigmoid Head is notably better quality signal compared to the original softmax head. As the Sigmoid Head does not rely on human-annotated quality data, it is more robust to out-of-domain settings compared to supervised QE.

Abstract:
AI guardrail systems support usage policies by determining whether a user query or a generated response is allowed or forbidden under the policy. Fine-tuned guardrails – such as LlamaGuard and ShieldGemma – include policy definitions in prompts during training that can be updated during inference to aid generalization. However, our analysis reveals that these models still overfit the training policies, which prevents adaptation to new domains. We propose Augmented Policy Training (APT), a training recipe that enhances guardrail adaptability to unseen policies by using a suite of policy perturbation strategies during training to reduce overfitting and increase generalization. Notably, a small 1B model trained in this manner achieves comparable or better performance than existing 8B guardrails on unseen policies. Our work reveals critical limitations of existing AI guardrails, offers a promising solution, and provides actionable insights for adapting systems to new domains and policies.

Abstract:
Many applications of LLM-based text regression require predicting a full conditional distribution rather than a single point value. We study distributional regression under empirical-quantile supervision, where each input is paired with multiple observed quantile outcomes, and the target distribution is represented by a dense grid of quantiles. We address two key limitations of current approaches: the lack of local grounding for distribution estimates, and the reliance on shared representations that create an indirect bottleneck between inputs and quantile outputs. In this paper, we introduce Quantile Token Regression, which, to our knowledge, is the first work to insert dedicated quantile tokens into the input sequence, enabling direct input-output pathways for each quantile through self-attention. We further augment these quantile tokens with retrieval, incorporating semantically similar neighbor instances and their empirical distributions to ground predictions with local evidence from similar instances. We also provide the first theoretical analysis of loss functions for quantile regression, clarifying which distributional objectives each optimizes. Experiments on the Inside Airbnb and StackSample benchmark datasets with LLMs ranging from 1.7B to 14B parameters show that quantile tokens with neighbors consistently outperform baselines ( ∼ 4 points lower MAPE and 2 × narrower prediction intervals), with especially large gains on smaller and more challenging datasets where quantile tokens produce substantially sharper and more accurate distributions.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adept at solving complex problems, such as mathematical reasoning and automatic evaluation. However, performance often degrades when prompts intertwine task instructions with rigid formatting requirements. This entanglement creates competing goals for the model, hindering its reasoning capabilities. To address this, we introduce Deco-G, a decoding framework that explicitly decouples format adherence from problem solving. Deco-G delegates format adherence to a separate Format Estimation Module (FEM), which performs probabilistic lookahead to estimate future format compliance rate and reweighs token probabilities, allowing the LLM to focus solely on task resolution. To make this approach both practical and efficient, we introduce three key innovations: instruction-aware distillation, a flexible trie-building algorithm, and HMM state pruning. Experiments across mathematical reasoning, event argument extraction, and LLM-as-a-judge demonstrate that Deco-G constantly gains over prompting or structured generation baselines, with guaranteed format compliance.

Abstract:
This position paper argues that in many realistic (i.e., complex, contextualized, subjective) scenarios, one LLM is not enough to produce a reliable output. We challenge the status quo of relying solely on a single general-purpose LLM and argue for multi-LLM collaboration to better represent the extensive diversity of data, skills, and people. We first posit that a single LLM underrepresents real-world data distributions, heterogeneous skills, and pluralistic populations, and that such representation gaps cannot be trivially patched by further training a single LLM. We then organize existing multi-LLM collaboration methods into a hierarchy, based on the level of access and information exchange, ranging from API-level, text-level, logit-level, to weight-level collaboration. Based on these methods, we highlight how multi-LLM collaboration addresses challenges that a single LLM struggles with, such as reliability, democratization, and pluralism. Finally, we identify the limitations of existing multi-LLM methods and motivate future work. We envision multi-LLM collaboration as an essential path toward compositional intelligence and collaborative AI development.

Abstract:
Paraphrasing uses different words, sentence structures, or expressions to convey similar semantics. It is an effective training data augmentation method to improve low-resource Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Existing studies normally leverage parallel corpora to construct parabanks, regarding the Machine Translation (MT) results of source sentences as the paraphrases of the corresponding target sentences. As MT models are usually trained on the same parallel corpus, translation of the training set may suffer from overfitting, which leads to less diverse paraphrases. Training paraphrasers on the parabank generated via MT may also suffer from the information loss issue, as the parabank is derived from the parallel corpora, and the knowledge inside the parabank is a subset of that inside the parallel corpora. In this paper, we train bidirectional Multilingual Neural Machine Translation (MNMT) on the bi-directional bilingual parallel corpus, and use the MNMT model directly as a paraphrasing model by asking it to generate "translations" of the input language. As some source tokens also appear in the translation in the parallel corpus, we introduce "copy"/"not-copy" tags to indicate the existence/non-existence of source tokens in the target translation during training, and use the "not-copy" tag to encourage paraphrasing during inference. Manual and automatic evaluation results show that our ParaMNMT method can generate paraphrases of higher semantic consistency, literal fluency and sentential diversity compared to existing parabanks and LLMs. Our data augmentation experiments verify the effectiveness of ParaMNMT on improving low-resource NLP tasks.

Abstract:
Achieving robust generalization in speech deepfake detection (SDD) remains a primary challenge, as models often fail to detect unseen forgery methods. While research has focused on model-centric and algorithm-centric solutions, the impact of data composition is often underexplored. This paper proposes a data-centric approach, analyzing the SDD data landscape from two practical perspectives: constructing a single dataset and aggregating multiple datasets. To address the first perspective, we conduct a large-scale empirical study to characterize the data scaling laws for SDD, quantifying the impact of source and generator diversity. To address the second, we propose the Diversity-Optimized Sampling Strategy (DOSS), a principled framework for mixing heterogeneous data with two implementations: DOSS-Select (pruning) and DOSS-Weight (re-weighting). Our experiments show that DOSS-Select outperforms the naive aggregation baseline while using only 3% of the total available data. Furthermore, our final model, trained on a 12k-hour curated data pool using the optimal DOSS-Weight strategy, achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming large-scale baselines with greater data and model efficiency on both public benchmarks and a new challenge set of various commercial APIs.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) outputs often vary across user sociodemographic attributes, leading to disparities in factual accuracy, utility, and safety, even for objective questions where demographic information is irrelevant. Unlike prior work on stereotypical or representational bias, this paper studies identity-dependent degradation of core response quality. We show empirically that such degradation arises from biased generation behavior, despite factual knowledge being robustly encoded across identities. Motivated by this mismatch, we propose a lightweight, training-free framework for identity-robust generation that selectively neutralizes non-critical identity information while preserving semantically essential attributes, thus maintaining output content integrity. Experiments across four benchmarks and 18 sociodemographic identities demonstrate an average 66.3% reduction in identity-dependent bias compared to vanilla prompting and outperforms existing prompt-based defenses. Our work addresses a critical gap in mitigating the impact of user identity cues in prompts on core generation quality.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a widely adopted paradigm for enhancing LLMs in medical applications by incorporating expert multi-modal knowledge during generation. However, the underlying retrieval databases may naturally contain, or be intentionally injected with, adversarial knowledge, which can perturb model outputs and undermine system reliability. To investigate this risk, prior studies have explored knowledge poisoning attacks in medical RAG systems. Nevertheless, most of them rely on the strong assumption that adversaries possess prior knowledge of user queries, which is unrealistic in deployments and substantially limits their practical applicability. In this paper, we propose M 3 Att, a knowledge-poisoning framework designed for medical multimodal RAG systems, assuming only limited distribution knowledge of the underlying database. Our core idea is to inject covert misinformation into textual data while using paired visual data as a query-agnostic trigger to promote retrieval. We first propose a unified framework that introduces imperceptible perturbations to visual inputs to manipulate retrieval probabilities. Besides, due to the prior medical knowledge in LLMs, naively poisoned medical content with explicit factual errors can be corrected during generation. Thus, we leverage the inherent ambiguity of medical diagnosis and design a covert misinformation injection strategy that degrades diagnostic accuracy while evading model self-correction. Experiments on five LLMs and datasets demonstrate that M 3 Att consistently produces clinically plausible yet incorrect generations. Codes: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/M3Att .

Abstract:
Games offer a compelling paradigm for developing general reasoning capabilities in language models, as they naturally demand strategic planning, probabilistic inference, and adaptive decision-making. However, existing self-play approaches rely solely on terminal game outcomes, providing no mechanism to distinguish transferable reasoning patterns from game-specific heuristics. We present STRATAGEM, which addresses two fundamental barriers to reasoning transfer: domain specificity, where learned patterns remain anchored in game semantics, and contextual stasis, where static game contexts fail to cultivate progressive reasoning. STRATAGEM selectively reinforces trajectories exhibiting abstract, domain-agnostic reasoning through a Reasoning Transferability Coefficient, while incentivizing adaptive reasoning development via a Reasoning Evolution Reward. Experiments across mathematical reasoning, general reasoning, and code generation benchmarks demonstrate substantial improvements, with particularly strong gains on competition-level mathematics where multi-step reasoning is critical. Ablation studies and human evaluation confirm that both components contribute to transferable reasoning.

Abstract:
Effective memory management is essential for large language model agents to navigate long-horizon tasks. Recent research has explored using Reinforcement Learning to develop specialized memory manager agents. However, existing approaches rely on final task performance as the primary reward, which results in severe reward sparsity and ineffective credit assignment, providing insufficient guidance for individual memory operations. To this end, we propose Fine-Mem, a unified framework designed for fine-grained feedback alignment. First, we introduce a Chunk-level Step Reward to provide immediate step-level supervision via auxiliary chunk-specific question answering tasks. Second, we devise Evidence-Anchored Reward Attribution to redistribute global rewards by anchoring credit to key memory operations, based on the specific memory items utilized as evidence in reasoning. Together, these components enable stable policy optimization and align local memory operations with the long-term utility of memory. Experiments on Memalpha and MemoryAgentBench demonstrate that Fine-Mem consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving superior success rates across various sub-tasks. Further analysis reveals its adaptability and strong generalization capabilities across diverse model configurations and backbones

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can perform sentiment analysis via natural language instructions, yet their predictions are highly sensitive to prompt phrasing. Prior work has shown that sentiment is encoded linearly in LLM representations, but the model’s ability to utilize this information remains surprisingly fragile to prompt variations. We leverage Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and circuit-level analysis to uncover causal mechanisms underlying sentiment prediction. We identify a sentiment analysis circuit and find that prompt sensitivity may stem from task activation failure. The model encodes the sentiment feature consistently, but different prompts trigger varying degrees of circuit activation. Based on this insight, we propose a simple inference-time intervention method that amplifies circuit features to compensate for insufficient activation. Experiments across diverse datasets, templates, and languages show consistent improvements, offering an interpretable and training-free alternative to manual prompt engineering.

Abstract:
Learning high quality sentence embeddings from dialogues has drawn increasing attentions as it is essential to solve a variety of dialogue-oriented tasks with low annotation cost. Annotating and gathering utterance relationships in conversations are difficult, while token-level annotations, , entities, slots and templates, are much easier to obtain. Other sentence embedding methods are usually sentence-level self-supervised frameworks and cannot utilize token-level extra knowledge. We introduce Template-aware Dialogue Sentence Embedding (TaDSE), a novel augmentation method that utilizes template information to learn utterance embeddings via self-supervised contrastive learning framework. We further enhance the effect with a synthetically augmented dataset that diversifies utterance-template association, in which slot-filling is a preliminary step. We evaluate TaDSE performance on five downstream benchmark dialogue datasets. The experiment results show that TaDSE achieves significant improvements over previous SOTA methods for dialogue. We further introduce a novel analytic instrument of semantic compression test, for which we discover a correlation with uniformity and alignment. Our code is available at https://github.com/minsik-ai/Template-Contrastive-Embedding

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) play a central role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, RMs are often sensitive to spurious features such as response length. Existing inference-time approaches for mitigating these biases typically focus exclusively on response length, resulting in performance trade-offs. In this paper, we propose causally motivated intervention for mitigating multiple types of biases in RMs at inference time. Our method first identifies neurons whose activations are strongly correlated with predefined bias attributes, and applies neuron-level intervention that suppresses these signals. We evaluate our method on RM benchmarks and observe reductions in sensitivity to spurious features across diverse bias types, without inducing performance trade-offs. Moreover, when used for preference annotation, small RMs (2B and 7B) with our method, which edits less than 2% of all the neurons in RMs, enable LLMs to improve alignment, achieving performance comparable to that of a state-of-the-art 70B RM on AlpacaEval and MT-Bench. Further analysis reveals that bias signals are primarily encoded by neurons in early layers, shedding light on the internal mechanisms of bias exploitation in RMs.

Abstract:
Personalized large language models (LLMs) tailor content to individual preferences using user profiles or histories. However, existing parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as the “One-PEFT-Per-User” (OPPU) paradigm, require training a separate adapter for each user, making them computationally expensive and impractical for real-time updates. We introduce Profile-to-PEFT, a scalable framework that employs a hypernetwork, trained end-to-end, to map a user’s encoded profile directly to a full set of adapter parameters (e.g., LoRA), eliminating per-user training at deployment. This design enables instant adaptation, generalization to unseen users, and privacy-preserving local deployment. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms both prompt-based personalization and OPPU while using substantially fewer computational resources at deployment. The framework exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution users and maintains robustness across varying user activity levels and different embedding backbones. The proposed Profile-to-PEFT framework enables efficient, scalable, and adaptive LLM personalization suitable for large-scale applications.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities, and as existing approaches for enhancing LLM reasoning continue to mature, increasing attention has shifted toward meta-reasoning as a promising direction for further improvement. However, most existing meta-reasoning methods remain episodic: they focus on executing complex meta-reasoning routines within individual instances, but ignore the accumulation of reusable meta-reasoning skills across instances, leading to recurring failure modes and repeatedly high metacognitive effort. In this paper, we introduce Metacognitive Consolidation, a novel framework in which a model consolidates metacognitive experience from past reasoning episodes into reusable knowledge that improves future meta-reasoning. We instantiate this framework by structuring instance-level problem solving into distinct roles for reasoning, monitoring, and control to generate rich, attributable meta-level traces. These traces are then consolidated through a hierarchical, multi-timescale update mechanism that gradually forms evolving meta-knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate consistent performance gains across benchmarks and backbone models, and show that performance improves as metacognitive experience accumulates over time.

Abstract:
Reliable verifiable data has become a key driver of capability gains in modern language models, enabling stable reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards and effective distillation that transfers competence across math, coding, and agentic tasks. Yet constructing generalizable synthetic verifiable data remains difficult due to hallucination-prone generation, and weak or trivial verification artifacts that fail to separate strong from weak solutions. Existing approaches often rely on task-specific heuristics or post-hoc filters that do not transfer across domains and lack a principled, universal evaluator of verifiability. In this work, we introduce an evolutionary, task-agnostic, strategy-guided, executably-checkable data synthesis framework that, from minimal seed supervision, jointly synthesizes problems, diverse candidate solutions, and verification artifacts, and iteratively discovers strategies via a consistency-based evaluator that enforces agreement between human-annotated and strategy-induced checks. This pipeline upgrades filtering into principled synthesis: it reliably assembles coherent, verifiable training instances and generalizes without domain-specific rules. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach under both RLVR and model distillation training paradigms. The results show that training with our synthesized data yields significant improvements on both the LiveCodeBench and AgentBench-OS tasks, highlighting the robust generalization of our framework.

Abstract:
Code Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing software engineering. However, scaling laws that guide the efficient training are predominantly analyzed on Natural Language (NL). Given the fundamental differences like strict syntax between code and NL, it is unclear whether these laws are directly applicable to code. To address this gap, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of scaling laws for code, comprising 117 experimental runs with model sizes from 0.2B to 3.8B and training tokens from 2B to 128B. We fit the Chinchilla law and the Farsser law. First, the results show that the more expressive Farseer law offers greater accuracy. Second, the analysis reveals that Code LLMs scale effectively with model size. Crucially, code represents a more data-hungry regime, requiring a substantially higher data-to-parameter ratio than NL. Finally, two additional sets of experiments on code-NL mixtures show that NL benefits resource-constrained scenarios, but becomes a detriment at higher compute budgets.

Abstract:
Large Language Model agents have rapidly evolved from static text generators into dynamic systems capable of executing complex autonomous workflows. To enhance reliability, multi-agent frameworks assigning specialized roles are increasingly adopted to enable self-reflection and mutual auditing. While such role-playing effectively leverages domain expert knowledge, we find it simultaneously induces a human-like cognitive bias known as Actor-Observer Asymmetry (AOA). Specifically, an agent acting as an actor (during self-reflection) tends to attribute failures to external factors, whereas an observer (during mutual auditing) attributes the same errors to internal faults. We quantify this using our new Ambiguous Failure Benchmark, which reveals that simply swapping perspectives triggers the AOA effect in over 20% of cases for most models. To tame this bias, we introduce ReTAS (Reasoning via Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis), a model trained through dialectical alignment to enforce perspective-invariant reasoning. By integrating dialectical chain-of-thought with Group Relative Policy Optimization, ReTAS guides agents to synthesize conflicting viewpoints into an objective consensus. Experiments demonstrate that ReTAS effectively mitigates attribution inconsistency and significantly improves fault resolution rates in ambiguous scenarios.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can effectively handle outdated information through knowledge editing. However, current approaches face two key limitations: (I) Poor generalization: Most approaches rigidly inject new knowledge without ensuring that the model can use it effectively to solve practical problems. (II) Narrow scope: Current methods focus primarily on structured fact triples, overlooking the diverse unstructured forms of factual information (e.g., news, articles) prevalent in real-world contexts. To address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm: teaching LLMs to edit knowledge via Chain of Thoughts (CoTs) reasoning (CoT2Edit). We first leverage language model agents for both structured and unstructured edited data to generate CoTs, building high-quality instruction data. The model is then trained to reason over edited knowledge through supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). At inference time, we integrate Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to dynamically retrieve relevant edited facts for real-time knowledge editing. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves strong generalization across six diverse knowledge editing scenarios with just a single round of training on three open-source language models.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) personalization aims to adapt general-purpose models to individual users. Most existing methods, however, are developed under data-rich and resource-abundant settings, often incurring privacy risks. In contrast, realistic personalization typically occurs after deployment under (i) extremely limited user data, (ii) constrained computational resources, and (iii) strict privacy requirements. We propose PRISP, a lightweight and privacy-safe personalization framework tailored to these constraints. PRISP leverages a Text-to-LoRA hypernetwork to generate task-aware LoRA parameters from task descriptions, and enables efficient user personalization by optimizing a small subset of task-aware LoRA parameters together with minimal additional modules using few-shot user data. Experiments on a few-shot variant of the LaMP benchmark demonstrate that PRISP achieves strong overall performance compared to prior approaches, while reducing computational overhead and eliminating privacy risks.

Abstract:
Bargaining is often regarded as a logical arena rather than an art or a matter of intuition, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle to navigate it due to limited strategic depth and difficulty adapting to complex human factors. Current benchmarks rarely capture this limitation. To bridge this gap, we present a utility feedback centric framework. Our contributions are: (i) AgoraBench, a new benchmark spanning nine challenging settings (e.g., deception, monopoly) that supports diverse strategy modeling; (ii) human-aligned, economically grounded metrics derived from utility theory. This is operationalized via agent utility, negotiation power, and acquisition ratio that implicitly measure how well the negotiation aligns with human preference and (iii) a human preference grounded dataset with learning pipeline that strengthens LLMs’ bargaining ability through both prompting and finetuning. Empirical results indicate that baseline LLM strategies often diverge from human preferences, while our mechanism substantially improves negotiation performance, yielding deeper strategic behavior and stronger opponent awareness.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving reasoning capabilities. However, training RLVR with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) policies remains fragile and is often prone to reward collapse.We identify a MoE-specific source of instability, referred to as router shift (RS), where changes in expert routing across policy updates exacerbate off-policy mismatch. This effect leads to increasingly volatile importance-ratio signals and bursty clipping behavior, which consistently precede training collapse.Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose Router-Shift Policy Optimization (RSPO). RSPO computes a per-token router-shift ratio conditioned on the previously activated experts, applies stop-gradient and a lower-bound floor, and softly rescales importance ratios prior to clipping and aggregation. This design explicitly accounts for routing-induced distributional drift during off-policy optimization.We evaluate the effect of RSPO under two settings: a synthetic countdown task and real-world reasoning tasks on MATH and Code. Across both settings, RSPO achieves better performance and exhibits greater stability compared to recent MoE-based RLVR methods.

Abstract:
As multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced to process video inputs, concerns have emerged about their potential for malicious misuse. Prior jailbreak studies have shown that safety alignment in MLLMs can be bypassed through visual inputs, yet it remains unclear which properties of video inputs induce this vulnerability. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-Clip Video (MCV) SafetyBench, a dataset of 2,920 videos designed to evaluate how the diversity of video inputs affects the vulnerability of MLLMs. Each video consists of multiple short clips depicting diverse contexts related to a harmful query. Experiments on eight representative video MLLMs show that attack success consistently increases with the number of clips. Our results further indicate that the video modality is (1) more vulnerable than the image modality, (2) more vulnerable to dynamic videos than to static videos, and (3) more vulnerable when videos contain more diverse contexts. Building on these findings, we propose a defense strategy that leverages the relative robustness of the image modality. Warning: This paper may contain potentially offensive content.

Abstract:
While natural language is the de facto communication medium for LLM-based agents, it presents a fundamental constraint. The process of downsampling rich, internal latent states into discrete tokens inherently limits the depth and nuance of information that can be transmitted, thereby hindering collaborative problem-solving. Inspired by telepathy, which bypasses symbolic language in communication, we propose Interlat (Inter-agent Latent Space Communication), a paradigm that leverages the continuous last hidden states of an LLM as a representation of its thought for direct communication (termed "latent communication"). An additional learned compression process further compresses latent communication via latent space reasoning. Experiments demonstrate that Interlat outperforms both fine-tuned chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting and single-agent baselines, even across heterogeneous models, promoting more exploratory behavior and enabling genuine utilization of latent information. Further compression not only substantially accelerates inference by up to 24× but also maintains competitive performance through an efficient information-preserving mechanism. We position this work as a feasibility study of entirely latent space inter-agent communication, and our results highlight its potential, offering valuable insights for future research.

Abstract:
Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM3) advances open-vocabulary segmentation through promptable concept segmentation, enabling users to segment all instances associated with a given concept using short noun-phrase (NP) prompts. While effective for concept-level grounding, real-world interactions often involve far richer natural-language instructions that combine attributes, relations, actions, states, or implicit reasoning. Currently, SAM3 relies on external multi-modal agents to convert complex instructions into NPs and conducts iterative mask filtering, leading to coarse representations and limited instance specificity. In this work, we present SAM3-I, an instruction-following extension of the SAM family that unifies concept-level grounding and instruction-level reasoning within a single segmentation framework. Built upon SAM3, SAM3-I introduces an instruction-aware cascaded adaptation mechanism with dedicated alignment losses that progressively aligns expressive instruction semantics with SAM3’s vision-language representations, enabling direct interpretation of natural-language instructions while preserving its strong concept recall ability. To enable instruction-following learning, we introduce HMPL-Instruct, a large-scale instruction-centric dataset that systematically covers hierarchical instruction semantics and diverse target granularities. Experiments demonstrate that SAM3-I achieves appealing performance across referring and reasoning-based segmentation, showing that SAM3 can be effectively extended to follow complex natural-language instructions without sacrificing its original concept-driven strengths. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/debby-0527/SAM3-I.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has driven recent gains of large language models (LLMs) on reasoning-intensive tasks by externalizing intermediate steps. However, excessive or redundant reasoning — so-called overthinking — can increase inference costs and lead LLMs toward incorrect conclusions. In this paper, we present REFRAIN ( ̲REF lective- ̲R edundancy for ̲A daptive ̲IN ference), a training-free framework that adaptively determines when to stop reasoning to mitigate overthinking. REFRAIN integrates a two-stage stop discriminator to identify reflective yet redundant reasoning and a sliding-window Upper Confidence Bound (SW-UCB) multi-armed bandit controller to dynamically adjust stopping thresholds according to problem difficulty without supervision or fine-tuning. Across four representative benchmarks and two model families, REFRAIN reduces token usage by 20-55% while maintaining or improving accuracy compared to standard CoT prompting. Extensive ablation and robustness analyses demonstrate its stability across models, scorers, and prompt variations. In summary, our findings highlight when-to-stop as a new and practical axis of test-time scaling — enabling models to reason not just more, but just enough.

Abstract:
High-quality, large-scale audio captioning is crucial for advancing audio understanding, yet current automated methods often generate captions that lack fine-grained detail and contextual accuracy, primarily due to their reliance on limited unimodal or superficial multimodal information. Drawing inspiration from human auditory perception, which adeptly integrates cross-modal cues and performs sophisticated auditory scene analysis, we introduce a novel two-stage automated pipeline. This pipeline first employs specialized pretrained models to extract diverse contextual cues (e.g., speech, music, general sounds, and visual information from associated video). A large language model (LLM) then synthesizes these rich, multimodal inputs to generate detailed and context-aware audio captions. Key contributions of this work include: (1) the proposed scalable method for fine-grained audio caption generation; (2) FusionAudio, a new large-scale dataset comprising 1.2 million such detailed captions, combined with 6 million QA pairs; and (3) enhanced audio models developed using FusionAudio, specifically a CLAP-based audio encoder with superior audio-text alignment and instruction following. This paper paves the way for more nuanced and accurate automated understanding of complex audio environments.

Abstract:
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories has emerged as a crucial technique for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the standard cross-entropy loss treats all tokens equally, ignoring their heterogeneous contributions across a reasoning trajectory. This uniform treatment leads to misallocated supervision and weak generalization, especially in complex, long-form reasoning tasks. To address this, we introduce Variance-Controlled Optimization-based REweighting (VCORE), a principled framework that reformulates CoT supervision as a constrained optimization problem. By adopting an optimization-theoretic perspective, VCORE enables a principled and adaptive allocation of supervision across tokens, thereby aligning the training objective more closely with the goal of robust reasoning generalization. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that VCORE achieves the strongest overall average performance, with especially clear gains on lower-capacity models. Across both in-domain and out-of-domain settings, VCORE achieves substantial performance gains on mathematical and coding benchmarks, using models from the Qwen3 series (4B, 8B, 32B) and LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct. Moreover, we show that VCORE serves as a more effective initialization for subsequent reinforcement learning, establishing a stronger foundation for advancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Abstract:
Learning speech representations that are useful for a variety of downstream tasks has received considerable attention, due to the outstanding properties of Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) trained models. Despite advancements in modelling methods, understanding the difference in task performance on representations is limited. Mainly motivated by the no-free-lunch theorem and speech production, this work investigates changes in task performance in sparse speech representations, providing interpretability analysis under the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework. Autoencoders with varying sparsity levels were trained using three SSL features, and evaluated on six tasks of SUPERB: Speech Enhancement (SE), Speaker Identification (SID), Speech Emotion Recognition (SER), Phone Recognition (PR), Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Slot Filling (SF). Experiments show that: 1) different tasks manifest different degrees of sensitivity to the sparsity levels; 2) the optimal sparsity level for task performance varies; 3) the choice of SSL features has a limited impact on most tasks but with an exception of PR; 4) overall PR and ASR require more preservation of relevant information about the labels, while SID and SER demand more compression of irrelevant information, where the input quality can shift this trade-off to some degree. These findings can contribute to the design of a universal sparse speech representation learner.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is intended to improve their reasoning capabilities, yet we uncover a counterintuitive effect: models often forget how to solve problems they previously answered correctly during training. We term this phenomenon Temporal Forgetting and show that it is widespread across model sizes, fine-tuning methods (both Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning), and multiple reasoning benchmarks. Our analysis reveals on average more than 20% of final errors were once solved correctly at an earlier checkpoint. Inspired by the phenomenon of Temporal Forgetting, we proposed Temporal Sampling, a simple decoding strategy that draws outputs from multiple checkpoints along the training trajectory. This approach recovers forgotten solutions and leads to significant improvements in reasoning performance than final-ckpt-sampling only, gains from 4 to 19 points in Pass@k and consistent gains for majority-voting and Best-of-N across several benchmarks. Temporal sampling also outperforms strong baselines such as model merging. By leveraging the temporal diversity inherent in training, Temporal Sampling offers a practical, compute-efficient way to surface hidden reasoning ability and rethink how we evaluate LLMs.

Abstract:
Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) increasingly rely on retrieval to answer knowledge-intensive multimodal questions. Existing benchmarks overlook conflicts between visual and textual evidence and the importance of generating deflections (e.g., "Sorry, I cannot answer...") when retrieved knowledge is incomplete. These benchmarks also suffer from rapid obsolescence, as growing LVLM training sets allow models to answer many questions without retrieval. We address these gaps with three contributions. First, we propose a dynamic data curation pipeline that preserves benchmark difficulty over time by filtering for genuinely retrieval-dependent samples. Second, we introduce VLM-DeflectionBench, a benchmark of 2,775 samples spanning diverse multimodal retrieval settings, designed to probe model behaviour under conflicting or insufficient evidence. Third, we define a fine-grained evaluation protocol with four scenarios that disentangle parametric memorization from retrieval robustness. Experiments across 20 state-of-the-art LVLMs indicate that models usually fail to deflect in the presence of noisy or misleading evidence. Our results highlight the need to evaluate not only what models know, but how they behave when they do not, and serve as a reusable and extensible benchmark for reliable KB-VQA evaluation. All resources will be publicly available upon publication.

Abstract:
Recent advances in generative AI have significantly enhanced the realism of multimodal media manipulation, thereby posing substantial challenges to manipulation detection. Existing manipulation detection and grounding approaches predominantly focus on manipulation type classification under result-oriented supervision, which not only lacks interpretability but also tends to overfit superficial artifacts. In this paper, we argue that generalizable detection requires incorporating explicit forensic reasoning, rather than merely classifying a limited set of manipulation types, which fails to generalize to unseen manipulation patterns. To this end, we propose REFORM, a reasoning-driven framework that shifts learning from outcome fitting to process modeling. REFORM adopts a three-stage curriculum that first induces forensic rationales, then aligns reasoning with final judgments, and finally refines logical consistency via reinforcement learning. To support this paradigm, we introduce ROM, a large-scale dataset with rich reasoning annotations. Extensive experiments show that REFORM establishes new state-of-the-art performance with superior generalization, achieving 81.52% ACC on ROM, 76.65% ACC on DGM4, and 74.9 F1 on MMFakeBench.

Abstract:
Vision language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong zero-shot performance, but often perpetuate social stereotypes in person-centric queries, yielding skewed demographic distributions. Current debiasing methods apply uniform bias corrections across all input queries regardless of their bias sensitivity, creating a fundamental fairness–utility trade-off. Strong debiasing distorts semantically meaningful information in bias-insensitive queries, while weak debiasing fails to mitigate stereotypes in bias-sensitive ones. This one-size-fits-all approach hampers simultaneously achieving high utility on bias-insensitive queries and fairness on bias-sensitive queries. We introduce Reward-Gated Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation framework that selectively applies debiasing based on input sensitivity. RG-TTA adaptively triggers fairness regularization based on the bias sensitivity of each input during test-time policy adaptation, while focusing exclusively on optimizing cross-modal alignment for bias-insensitive inputs. Experiments on fairness benchmarks (e.g., FairFace, UTKFace) demonstrate substantial bias reduction while simultaneously improving zero-shot utility, resolving the trade-off of uniform debiasing.

Abstract:
Previous work on cross-document event coreference resolution (CDECR) primarily focused on enhancing semantic coherence between event mentions, largely overlooking the critical aspect of temporal coherence. To address this issue, we propose CohTP, a novel Temporal Cohorence-driven event coreference framework. CohTP explicitly models and enforces temporal constraints by first constructing a temporal event graph via a fine-tuned natural language inference (NLI) model. The graph is then refined using an Edge-Aware GNN to resolve conflicts and partitioned into ordered time segments, where undirected edges group contemporaneous events. Event coreference resolution is subsequently performed within these temporally coherent segments, where event representations are further augmented with temporally consistent contexts. Experiments on the ECB+, GVC, WEC, and ECB+META datasets show that CohTP outperforms several state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Interleaved reasoning paradigms enhance Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with visual feedback but are hindered by the prohibitive computational cost of re-encoding pixel-dense images. A promising alternative, latent visual reasoning, circumvents this bottleneck yet faces limitations: methods either fail to capture intermediate state evolution due to single-step, non-interleaved structures, or sacrifice precise perceptual modeling by over-compressing features. We introduce Interleaved Latent Visual Reasoning (ILVR), a framework that unifies dynamic state evolution with precise perceptual modeling. ILVR interleaves textual generation with latent visual representations that act as specific, evolving cues for subsequent reasoning. Specifically, we employ a self-supervision strategy where a momentum teacher model selectively distills relevant features from ground-truth intermediate images into sparse supervision targets. This adaptive selection mechanism guides the model to autonomously generate context-aware visual signals. Extensive experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ILVR outperforms existing approaches, effectively bridging the gap between fine-grained perception and sequential multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
Image-goal navigation steers an agent to a target location specified by an image in unseen environments. Existing methods primarily handle this task by learning an end-to-end navigation policy, which compares the similarities of target and observation images and directly predicts the actions. However, when the target is distant or lies in another room, such methods fail to extract informative visual cues, leading the agent to wander around. Motivated by the human cognitive principle that deliberate, high-level reasoning guides fast, reactive execution in complex tasks, we propose Hierarchical Reasoning Navigation (HRNav), a framework that decomposes image-goal navigation into high-level planning and low-level execution. In high-level planning, a vision-language model is trained on a self-collected dataset to generate a short-horizon plan, such as whether the agent should walk through the door or down the hallway. This downgrades the difficulty of the long-horizon task, making it more amenable to the execution part. In low-level execution, an online reinforcement learning policy is utilized to decide actions conditioned on the short-horizon plan. We also devise a novel Wandering Suppression Penalty (WSP) to further reduce the wandering problem. Together, these components form a hierarchical framew ork for Image-Goal Navigation. Extensive experiments in both simulation and real-world environments demonstrate the superiority of our method.

Abstract:
Medical multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) benchmarks implicitly assume that large language models (LLMs) should always commit to an answer. However, in clinical practice, uncertainty is pervasive and abstaining is often the safest action. We introduce MedQAbstain, a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate medical abstention under uncertainty. MedQAbstain repurposes standard medical MCQA datasets by removing the gold answer and introducing an explicit "I abstain" option, framed as a safety-critical decision with clinical consequences. The benchmark supports systematic analysis across abstention regimes, distractor complexity, and input modalities, and elicits self-reported model confidence to study calibration. Across all settings, we find that state-of-the-art LLMs systematically overcommit, rarely abstaining even when the question itself is hidden. These results reveal a fundamental mismatch between LLM behavior and clinical norms, highlighting abstention as a critical but overlooked dimension of medical decision-making evaluation.

Abstract:
Existing jamming attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems typically induce explicit refusals or denial-of-service behaviors, which are conspicuous and easy to detect. In this work, we formalize a subtler availability threat, termed soft failure, which degrades system utility by inducing fluent and coherent yet non-informative responses rather than overt failures. We propose Deceptive Evolutionary Jamming Attack (DEJA), an automated black-box attack framework that generates adversarial documents to trigger such soft failures by exploiting safety-aligned behaviors of large language models. DEJA employs an evolutionary optimization process guided by a fine-grained Answer Utility Score (AUS), computed via an LLM-based evaluator, to systematically undermine the certainty of answers while maintaining high retrieval success.Extensive experiments across multiple RAG configurations and benchmark datasets show that DEJA consistently drives responses toward low-utility soft failures and that the resulting adversarial documents maintain high stealth and effectiveness, proving resilient against common mitigation strategies including perplexity-based detection and input perturbations.

Abstract:
Multimedia event extraction aims to jointly identify events and their arguments across multiple modalities, such as text and images, to support more comprehensive event understanding. While recent work reports steady and substantial progress, the reliability and comparability of these results critically depend on consistent and rigorous evaluation. In this work, we present the first systematic analysis of evaluation pitfalls in multimedia event extraction and identify three major sources of issues: inconsistent data processing, inconsistent task assumptions, and overly relaxed evaluation settings. We demonstrate, through a series of controlled experiments under a strict evaluation framework, that minor evaluation choices can cause large performance variations and lead to overestimation of a model’s ability to ground real-world events across modalities. Our findings highlight the need for comparable evaluation standards and encourage a shift toward more rigorous evaluation in multimedia event extraction.

Abstract:
Explicit knowledge conflicts, where retrieved contexts contain contradictory information, have become increasingly prevalent as Large Language Models (LLMs) integrate diverse data sources. The core challenge lies in the complexity of entangled narratives and the heterogeneity of conflict cases, which impose excessive demands on the reasoning capabilities of standard models. To address this, we propose K nowledge C onflict R easoning ( KCR ), a framework that adjudicates conflicts by structuring the underlying logic. KCR first disentangles conflicting contexts into distinct sets of reasoning traces, utilizing both textual and graph-based representations, to simplify comprehension. It then employs a Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) paradigm, guiding the model to internalize a reasoning process that maximizes logical consistency while actively suppressing spurious reasoning paths derived from contradictory contexts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KCR yields substantial improvements: a KCR-enhanced 7B model surpasses the performance of baselines equipped with top-tier closed-source models such as GPT-4o and GPT-5.1.

Abstract:
We propose UniVocal, a unified framework that implicitly infers vocal modes from text context to pioneer Speech-Singing Code-Switching (SCS) Synthesis—a task where transitions are autonomously driven by textual semantics, akin to seamless human language blending. Unlike single-mode generation or systems relying on switching-control tags, our proposed UniVocal implicitly infers vocal modes solely from text context. To achieve this, we employ a data-efficient two-stage curriculum learning strategy that progressively trains a competitive TTS system to acquire the desired SCS capability. Addressing data scarcity, we introduce a scalable pipeline to synthesize diverse code-switching data that is both semantically and acoustically natural, alongside a new multi-scenario benchmark, SCSBench. To address limitations of semantic tokenizers in capturing acoustic details, we also introduce refined cent token and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation for planning prosody before content generation, effectively enhancing empathetic speech generation and singing melody. Experimental results demonstrate that UniVocal achieves state-of-the-art performance on SCSBench while maintaining competitive performance on regular speech and singing tasks. Audio samples are available at https://project-univocal-demo.github.io/demo/ . The code and dataset are released at https://github.com/FunAudioLLM/FunResearch/tree/main/UniVocal .

Abstract:
As AI text detectors are increasingly used to flag LLM-generated writing, a natural question arises: are there forms of high-quality generated narrative that can evade such detection? We introduce Frankentexts, a long-form narrative generation paradigm that treats an LLM as a composer of existing texts rather than as an author. Given a writing prompt and thousands of randomly sampled human-written snippets, the model assembles a coherent narrative where most tokens (e.g., 90%) are copied verbatim from the source passages. Despite the extreme challenge of the task, we observe through extensive automatic and human evaluation that Frankentexts improve over vanilla LLM generations in key writing quality metrics such as diversity and novelty while remaining mostly coherent and relevant to the prompt. Furthermore, Frankentexts pose a fundamental challenge to current AI text detectors: 72% of Frankentexts produced by our best configuration (Gemini-2.5-Pro with 5K input snippets) are misclassified as human-written by Pangram, a state-of-the-art detector. Human annotators praise Frankentexts for their inventive premises, vivid descriptions, and dry humor; however, they still identify issues with abrupt tonal shifts and uneven grammar across segments. Overall, the emergence of high-quality yet low-detectability Frankentexts challenges established authorship norms while raising concerns about the publishing economy.

Abstract:
Long contexts break transformers: attention scores dilute across thousands of tokens, critical information gets lost in the middle, and the model cannot adapt to novel patterns at inference time. Recent work on test-time adaptation addresses this by maintaining a form of working memory—transient parameters updated on the current context—but existing approaches employ uniform write policies that waste computation on low-value regions and suffer from high gradient variance across semantically heterogeneous contexts. In this work, we reframe test-time adaptation as a budget-constrained memory consolidation problem, asking: given limited computational budget, which parts of the context should be consolidated into working memory? We propose GDWM ( G ated D ifferentiable W orking M emory ), a framework that introduces a Write Controller to gate the memory consolidation process. Our controller estimates Contextual Utility—an information-theoretic measure quantifying how much each region depends on long-range context—and allocates gradient steps accordingly, subject to a coverage constraint that ensures global representation. Theoretically, we prove that our chunk-restricted sampling strategy reduces gradient variance by eliminating inter-chunk variance via the Law of Total Variance. Experiments on ZeroSCROLLS and LongBench v2 benchmarks demonstrate that GDWM achieves comparable or superior performance with 4 ×fewer gradient steps compared to uniform baselines—excelling on sparse-information tasks (+6–13% on Qasper, +5–13% on GovReport for smaller models) while revealing principled trade-offs on dense-coverage tasks, establishing a new efficiency-performance Pareto frontier for test-time adaptation.

Abstract:
Evaluating the factual consistency of abstractive text summarization remains a significant challenge, particularly for long documents, where conventional metrics struggle with input length limitations and long-range dependencies. In this work, we systematically evaluate the reliability of six widely used reference-free factuality metrics, originally proposed for short-form summarization, in the long-document setting. We probe metric robustness through seven factuality-preserving perturbations applied to summaries, namely paraphrasing, simplification, synonym replacement, logically equivalent negations, vocabulary reduction, compression, and source text insertion, and further analyze their sensitivity to retrieval context and claim information density. Across three long-form benchmark datasets spanning science fiction, legal, and scientific domains, our results reveal that existing short-form metrics produce inconsistent scores for semantically equivalent summaries and exhibit declining reliability for information-dense claims whose content is semantically similar to many parts of the source document. While expanding the retrieval context improves stability in some domains, no metric consistently maintains factual alignment under long-context conditions. Finally, our results highlight concrete directions for improving factuality evaluation, including multi-span reasoning, context-aware calibration, and training on meaning-preserving variations to enhance robustness in long-form summarization.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) in retrieval-augmented generation systems can still produce hallucinations, generating content that is unsupported or contradicted by the source texts and undermines reliability. Recent work addressed this problem by training span-level hallucination detectors using reinforcement learning (RL) and chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. In this work, we show through error analysis that incorrect predictions by existing reasoning-based detectors are strongly associated with CoT processes that lack explicit grounding in source evidence, particularly when verification steps do not quote or verify claims against the retrieved documents. This behaviour contrasts with human verification practices in benchmarks such as RAGTruth, where evidence quotation is a prerequisite for determining hallucinated spans. Motivated by this observation, we propose an evidence-grounded RL framework, namely RLSeek, to explicitly enforce active evidence seeking during CoT reasoning by requiring quotation of relevant source segments at each verification step. Experiments on the RAGTruth and NewsSum dataset demonstrate consistent improvements in hallucination span detection performance, with limited additional reasoning overhead and improved robustness in out-of-domain settings.

Abstract:
Social reasoning—inferring unobservable beliefs and intentions from partial observations of other agents—remains a challenging task for large language models (LLMs). We evaluate the limits of current reasoning language models in the social deduction game Avalon and find that while the largest models demonstrate strong performance, they require extensive test-time inference and degrade sharply when distilled to smaller, real-time-capable variants. To address this, we introduce a hybrid reasoning framework that externalizes belief inference to a structured probabilistic model, while using an LLM for language understanding and interaction. Our approach achieves competitive performance with much larger models in Agent-Agent play and, notably, is the first language agent to defeat human players in a controlled study—achieving a 67% win rate and receiving higher qualitative ratings than both reasoning baselines and human teammates. We release code, models, and a dataset to support future work on social reasoning in LLM agents.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have recently demonstrated significant improvements in complex reasoning. While quantifying generation uncertainty in LRMs is crucial, traditional methods are often insufficient because they do not provide finite-sample guarantees for reasoning-answer generation. Conformal prediction (CP) stands out as a model-agnostic methodology that constructs statistically rigorous uncertainty sets. However, existing CP methods ignore the logical connection between the reasoning trace and the final answer. Additionally, prior studies fail to interpret the origins of uncertainty coverage for LRMs as they typically overlook the specific training factors driving valid reasoning. Notably, it is challenging to disentangle reasoning quality from answer correctness, while simultaneously establishing theoretical guarantees for computationally efficient explanation methods. To address these challenges, we first propose a novel methodology that provides the uncertainty of the reasoning-answer structure with statistical guarantees. Subsequently, we develop a unified example-to-step explanation framework using Shapley values that identifies a provably sufficient subset of training data and their specific reasoning steps sufficient to achieve coverage. We also provide the theoretical analysis for our proposed methods. Extensive experiments on challenging reasoning datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Abstract:
Large language models increasingly expose reasoning traces, yet their underlying cognitive structure and steps remain difficult to identify and analyze beyond surface-level statistics. We adopt Schoenfeld’s Episode Theory as an inductive, intermediate-scale lens and introduce ThinkARM (Anatomy of Reasoning in Models), a scalable framework that explicitly abstracts reasoning traces into functional reasoning steps such as Analysis, Explore, Implement, Verify, etc. When applied to mathematical problem solving by diverse models, this abstraction reveals reproducible thinking dynamics and structural differences between reasoning and non-reasoning models, which are not apparent from token-level views. We further present two diagnostic case studies showing that exploration functions as a critical branching step associated with correctness, and that efficiency-oriented methods selectively suppress evaluative feedback steps rather than uniformly shortening responses. Together, our results demonstrate that episode-level representations make reasoning steps explicit, enabling systematic analysis of how reasoning is structured, stabilized, and altered in modern language models.

Abstract:
Prompt injection attacks pose serious security risks across a wide range of real-world applications. While receiving increasing attention, the community faces a critical gap: the lack of a unified platform for prompt injection evaluation. This makes it challenging to reliably compare defenses, understand their true robustness under diverse attacks, or assess how well they generalize across tasks and benchmarks. For instance, many defenses initially reported as effective were later found to exhibit limited robustness on diverse datasets and attacks. To bridge this gap, we introduce PIArena, a unified and extensible platform for prompt injection evaluation that enables users to easily integrate state-of-the-art attacks and defenses and evaluate them across a variety of existing and new benchmarks. We also design a dynamic strategy-based attack that adaptively optimizes injected prompts based on defense feedback. Through comprehensive evaluation using PIArena, we uncover critical limitations of state-of-the-art defenses: limited generalizability across tasks, vulnerability to adaptive attacks, and fundamental challenges when an injected task aligns with the target task. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/sleeepeer/PIArena.

Abstract:
There is a growing consensus that, in order to serve as models of human language processing, language models (LMs) need to be constrained in their use of memory for context, the analogue to human working memory (WM). Here we take a novel yet simple approach to constraining WM in language models, in a way that reflects models of human cognition where memory is treated as a limited resource and deployed strategically. In order to capture this constraint on memory encoding, we inject noise into the hidden representations of Transformer-based LMs at tunable rates. Then we train the models with a hybrid objective, such that they learn to maximize the performance of next-word prediction subject to explicit constraints on the total encoding precision. We find that explicit WM constraints improve the model’s alignment with human reading times. More importantly, we find that the need to manage encoding precision reshapes the nature of the models’ context representations, making them more compressed and categorical. Our results show how resource-rational models of WM allocation can be implemented in neural models simply and successfully, and point to a dissociation between WM retrieval mechanisms and the underlying memory representations in models of human sentence processing.

Abstract:
Multilingual language models (LMs) organize representations for typologically and orthographically diverse languages into a shared parameter space, yet the nature of this internal organization remains elusive. In this work, we investigate which linguistic properties — abstract language identity or surface-form cues — shape multilingual representations. To do so, we analyze language-associated units across different model families and scales using the Language Activation Probability Entropy (LAPE) metric, and further decompose activations with Sparse Autoencoders. We find that these units are strongly conditioned on orthography: romanization induces near-disjoint representations that align with neither native-script inputs nor English, while word-order shuffling has limited effect on unit identity. Probing shows that typological structure becomes increasingly accessible in deeper layers, while causal interventions indicate that generation is most sensitive to units that are invariant to surface-form perturbations rather than to units identified by typological alignment alone. Overall, our results suggest that multilingual LMs organize representations around surface form, with linguistic abstraction emerging gradually without collapsing into a unified interlingua.

Abstract:
Audio-language pretraining (ALP) holds promise for learning general-purpose audio representation, yet remains underexplored. Crucially, there is no consensus on whether audio–language models can build effective general-purpose audio encoders, nor a systematic understanding of how pretraining objectives behave across diverse tasks and scales.We identify three key barriers: limited scale of audio-text corpora, limited coverage of audio attributes in existing caption corpora, and lack of systematic exploration and evaluation.To fill this gap, we present the first principled empirical study of ALP.We first introduce CaptionStew, a 10.7M caption dataset aggregating open-source audio-text corpora across multiple domains and captioning focuses.We then conduct the first comprehensive evaluation comparing contrastive and captioning objectives for learning audio representation across speech, music, and environmental sound tasks.Our results not only demonstrate that ALP yields competitive, transferable representations, but reveal critical trade-offs: contrastive learning offers superior data efficiency, while captioning exhibits better scalability.Furthermore, we find that the benefits of supervised initialization often diminish at larger scales, challenging common practices.By grounding these claims in empirical evidence, we establish a viable pathway toward general-purpose audio representation learning, guiding future research.

Abstract:
Detecting deceptive behavior in LLMs is typically done post-hoc on outputs or by probing static activations. We instead treat deception as a dynamic process, a trajectory through the model’s hidden-state space during inference. We capture layerwise activations at sparse "decision points" where the model is uncertain between competing tokens, forming activation trajectories for matched truthful vs. deceptive responses across strategic deception, sycophancy, instructed deception, and confabulation. Across GPT-2 and Llama variants, deceptive generation is associated with changes in trajectory geometry, but increases in path length are model and deception-type-dependent. Sycophancy shows the clearest signal, whereas instructed deception yields near-null signatures. With just 7 geometric features, a lightweight classifier achieves performance comparable to PCA-reduced probing at matched dimensionality for binary sycophancy detection and shows preliminary utility for 4-way deception-type classification. These findings indicate that trajectory-based monitoring can provide process-level signals associated with deceptive generation during inference, complementing methods that focus on endpoint activation states.

Abstract:
Relation extraction (RE) is a core task in natural language processing. Traditional approaches typically frame RE as a supervised learning problem, directly mapping context to labels—an approach that often suffers from poor out-of-domain (OOD) generalization. Inspired by the workflow of human annotators, we reframe RE as a reasoning task guided by annotation guidelines and introduce R1-RE, the first reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) framework for RE tasks. Our method elicits the reasoning abilities of small language models for annotation tasks, resulting in significantly improved OOD robustness. We evaluate our approach on the public Sem-2010 dataset and a private MDKG dataset. The R1-RE-7B model attains an average OOD accuracy of approximately 70%, on par with leading proprietary models such as GPT-4o. Additionally, our comprehensive analysis provides novel insights into the training dynamics and emergent reasoning behaviors of the RLVR paradigm for RE.

Abstract:
Traditional reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) for large language models (LLMs) relies on expensive human-annotated datasets, while Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) also incurs significant costs, requiring the collection of diverse prompts and corresponding responses, often necessitating external reward models or proprietary models like GPT-4 to annotate preference pairs. In this work, we introduce Self-Alignment Optimization (SAO), a fully self-synthetic framework for LLM alignment, where all training data, including prompts (i.e., user queries), responses, and preferences, are generated by the model itself. Specifically, SAO first instructs the LLM to engage in persona role-play and generate diverse prompts and responses, which are then self-evaluated for preference optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SAO effectively enhances the model’s chat capabilities on standard benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0, while maintaining strong performance on downstream objective tasks (i.e.,, question-answering, math reasoning). Our work provides a practical solution for self-improvement in aligning LLMs, and the code for reproducing our results is available at: https://github.com/SJY8460/SAO.

Abstract:
We propose a corpus-dependent alternative to byte encoding that learns fixed-length atomic codes for characters directly from text, which we refer to as Latom (Learned Atom-based Encoding).We instantiate this framework by training an HMM on N-repeated character sequences to estimate "atom" posteriors, followed by a Hungarian assignment yielding a globally optimal one-to-one character-code mapping.Across 14 languages, the encodings improve intrinsic metrics, including token counts after subword tokenization and bigram perplexity, with appropriate code lengths.On Amazon Reviews in six languages, Latom improves text classification accuracy and reduces decoding errors in language model generation.Overall, these results demonstrate that character encodings can be learned from corpus statistics while remaining reversible and compatible with standard tokenization pipelines.

Abstract:
Visual evidence selection is a critical component of multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), yet existing methods typically rely on semantic relevance or surface-level similarity, which are often misaligned with the actual utility of visual evidence for downstream reasoning. We reformulate multimodal evidence selection from an information-theoretic perspective by defining evidence utility as the information gain induced on a model’s output distribution. To overcome the intractability of answer-space optimization, we introduce a latent notion of evidence helpfulness and theoretically show that, under mild assumptions, ranking evidence by information gain on this latent variable is equivalent to answer-space utility. We further propose a training-free, surrogate-accelerated framework that efficiently estimates evidence utility using lightweight multimodal models. Experiments on MRAG-Bench and Visual-RAG across multiple model families demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RAG baselines while achieving substantial reductions in computational cost. We release our code at https://github.com/Hcnaeg/utility-mrag.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to a surge in both model supply and application demands. To facilitate effective matching between them, generic and efficient benchmark generators that can construct high-quality benchmarks are widely needed. However, human annotators are constrained by inefficiency, and current LLM-based benchmark generators lack not only generalizability but also a comprehensive evaluation framework for validation and optimization. To fill this gap, we first establish an automated evaluation framework, structured around four dimensions and ten criteria. Under this framework, we carefully analyze the advantages and weaknesses of directly prompting LLMs as generic benchmark generators. On this basis, we introduce a series of methods to address the identified weaknesses and integrate them as BenchMaker. Experiments across multiple LLMs and tasks confirm that BenchMaker achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics, highlighting its generalizability and validity. More importantly, it delivers highly consistent evaluation results across 21 LLMs (e.g., 0.969 Pearson correlation against MMLU-Pro on language understanding task), while incurring minimal overhead (e.g., 0.005 and 0.38 minutes per sample when using GPT-4o mini as generator).

Abstract:
Time introduces fundamental challenges in model development and deployment: models are usually trained on historical data while deployed on future data where semantic distributions and domain knowledge may evolve. Unfortunately, existing studies either overlook temporal shifts or hardly capture rich shifting patterns of both semantic and knowledge. We develop Knowledge-driven Augmentation and Retrieval for Integrative Temporal Adaptation (KARITA) to capture diverse temporal shifts (e.g., uncertainty and feature shift), construct and integrate rich knowledge sources (e.g., medical ontology like MeSH), and leverage shifting insights for selecting-retrieval augmented learning. We evaluate KARITA on classification tasks across multiple domains, clinical, legal, and scientific corpora, demonstrating consistent improvements across all domain with temporal adaptation. Our results show that knowledge integration can be more critical and effective in temporal augmentation and learning.

Abstract:
Argumentation generation has attracted substantial research interest due to its central role in human reasoning and decision-making. However, most existing argumentative corpora focus on non-interactive, single-turn settings, either generating arguments from a given topic or refuting an existing argument. In practice, however, argumentation is often realized as multi-turn dialogue, where speakers defend their stances and employ diverse argumentative strategies to strengthen persuasiveness. To support deeper modeling of argumentation dialogue, we present the first large-scale S trategic A rgumentative D ialogue dataset, SAD, consisting of 392,822 examples. Grounded in argumentation theories, we annotate each utterance with five strategy types, allowing multiple strategies per utterance. Unlike prior datasets, SAD requires models to generate contextually appropriate arguments conditioned on the dialogue history, a specified stance on the topic, and targeted argumentation strategies. We further benchmark a range of pretrained generative models on SAD and present in-depth analysis of strategy usage patterns in argumentation.

Abstract:
Watermarking has emerged as a promising technique for tracing the authorship of content generated by large language models (LLMs). Among existing approaches, the KGW scheme is particularly attractive due to its versatility, efficiency, and effectiveness in natural language generation.However, KGW’s effectiveness degrades significantly under low-entropy settings such as code generation and mathematical reasoning. A crucial step in the KGW method is random vocabulary partitioning, which enables adjustments to token selection based on specific preferences. Our study revealed that the next-token probability distribution plays an critical role in determining how much, or even whether, we can modify token selection and, consequently, the effectiveness of watermarking.We refer to this characteristic, associated with the probability distribution of each token prediction, as watermark strength. In cases of random vocabulary partitioning, the lower bound of watermark strength is dictated by the next-token probability distribution. However, we found that, by redesigning the vocabulary partitioning algorithm, we can potentially raise this lower bound. In this paper, we propose SSG ( S ort-then- S plit by G roups), a method that partitions the vocabulary into two logit-balanced subsets. This design lifts the lower bound of watermark strength for each token prediction, thereby improving watermark detectability. Experiments on code generation and mathematical reasoning datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of SSG.

Abstract:
The transformer is the most popular neural architecture for language modeling. The cornerstone of the transformer is its global attention mechanism, which lets the model aggregate information from all preceding tokens before generating the next token. One common variant of attention is called local attention, which restricts each token to aggregating information from a bounded window of predecessors, reducing the quadratic cost of global attention to linear. Although this restriction is usually motivated by efficiency, it has also been found to improve model quality, a phenomenon that has so far lacked a satisfactory explanation. We provide a formal account of this phenomenon in terms of recognizer expressivity. It has been shown that fixed-precision transformers with global attention correspond to a fragment of linear temporal logic containing a single past operator. We additionally prove that adding local attention introduces a second temporal operator, strictly enlarging the class of recognizable regular languages. Moreover, global and local attention are expressively complementary: neither subsumes the other, and combining them yields the richest fragment. Experiments on formal language recognition and natural language modeling corroborate the theory, showing that hybrid global–local transformers outperform their global-only counterparts.

Abstract:
Recent research has devoted considerable effort to verifying the intermediate reasoning steps of chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories using process reward models (PRMs) and other verifier models. However, training a PRM typically requires human annotators to assign reward scores to each reasoning step, which is both costly and time-consuming. Existing automated approaches, such as Monte Carlo (MC) estimation, also demand substantial computational resources due to repeated LLM rollouts. To overcome these limitations, we propose contrastive pointwise mutual information (CPMI), a novel automatic reward labeling method that leverages the model’s internal probability to infer step-level supervision while significantly reducing the computational burden of annotating dataset. CPMI quantifies how much a reasoning step increases the mutual information between the step and the correct target answer relative to hard-negative alternatives. This contrastive signal serves as a proxy for the step’s contribution to the final solution and yields a reliable reward. The experimental results show that CPMI-based labeling reduces dataset construction time by 84% and token generation by 98% compared to MC estimation, while achieving higher accuracy on process-level evaluations and mathematical reasoning benchmarks.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrates remarkable zero-shot annotation tasks, they often struggle with the specialized conventions of gold-standard benchmarks. We propose the systematic reuse and refinement of annotation guidelines as an alignment mechanism, introducing an iterative moderation framework that simulates the early phases of annotation projects. We evaluate three hypotheses: (1) the efficacy of guideline integration, (2) the advantage of reasoning-optimized models, and (3) the viability of moderation under minimal supervision. Testing across biomedical NER tasks (NCBI Disease, BC5CDR, BioRED) with three LLM families (GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek), our results empirically confirm all three hypotheses. While the iterative moderation framework shows a good potential in effectively refining guidelines, our analysis also reveals a significant room for improvement.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation(RAG) systems depend on retrieval modules to supply grounding evidence for large language models. While hybrid approaches combining sparse and dense retrievers improve performance, most rely on fixed weights that ignore query-specific and corpus-specific variation. Similarly, query expansion has long been used to enrich recall, but its integration with original queries is usually static and can introduce noise. We present QuDAR, a dual-perspective adaptive retrieval framework that adapts along two perspectives: retriever type (sparse vs. dense) and query format (original vs.expanded). Leveraging margin-derived confidence (e.g., top-1–top-2 score gaps) and blind LLM-based relevance scoring, QuDAR dynamically assigns query-specific weights, fusing lexical specificity with semantic breadth while mitigating noise. QuDAR is lightweight, retriever-agnostic, and broadly applicable. Experiments show consistent gains over static baselines, improving overall retrieval quality and yielding more stable performance across queries.

Abstract:
Unsupervised automatic readability assessment (ARA) methods have important practical and research applications (e.g., ensuring medical or educational materials are suitable for their target audiences). In this paper, we propose a new zero-shot prompting methodology for ARA and present the first comprehensive evaluation of using large language models (LLMs) as an unsupervised ARA method by testing 10 diverse open-source LLMs (e.g., different sizes and developers) on 14 diverse datasets (e.g., different text lengths and languages). Our findings show that our proposed prompting methodology outperforms prior methods on 13 of the 14 datasets. Furthermore, we propose LAURAE, which combines LLM and readability formula scores to improve robustness by capturing both contextual and shallow (e.g., sentence length) features of readability. Our evaluation demonstrates that LAURAE robustly outperforms prior methods across languages, text lengths, and amounts of technical language.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly trained on massive, heterogeneous text corpora, raising serious concerns about the unauthorised use of proprietary or personal data during model training. In this work, we address the problem of data protection against unwanted model learning in a realistic black-box setting. We propose Disclaimer Injection, a novel data-level defence that renders text unlearnable to LLMs. Rather than relying on model-side controls or explicit data removal, our approach exploits the models’ own alignment mechanisms: by injecting carefully designed alignment-triggering disclaimers to prevent effective learning. Through layer-wise analysis, we find that fine-tuning on such protected data induces persistent activation of alignment-related layers, causing alignment constraints to override task learning even on common inputs. Consequently, models trained on such data exhibit substantial and systematic performance degradation compared to standard fine-tuning. Our results identify alignment behaviour as a previously unexplored lever for data protection and, to our knowledge, present the first practical method for restricting data learnability at LLM scale without requiring access to or modification of the training pipeline.

Abstract:
Recent agentic search frameworks enable deep research via iterative planning and retrieval, reducing hallucinations and enhancing factual grounding. However, they remain text-centric, overlooking the multimodal evidence that characterizes real-world expert reports. We introduce a pressing task: multimodal long-form generation. Accordingly, we propose Deep-Reporter, a unified agentic framework for grounded multimodal long-form generation. It orchestrates: (i) Agentic Multimodal Search and Filtering to retrieve and filter textual passages and information-dense visuals; (ii) Checklist-Guided Incremental Synthesis to ensure coherent image-text integration and optimal citation placement; and (iii) Recurrent Context Management to balance long-range coherence with local fluency. We develop a rigorous curation pipeline producing 8K high-quality agentic traces for model optimization. We further introduce M 2 LongBench, a comprehensive testbed comprising 247 research tasks across 9 domains and a stable multimodal sandbox. It enables unified multimodal assessment, fair comparison, and accessible evaluation without commercial APIs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that long-form multimodal generation is a challenging task, especially in multimodal selection and integration, and effective post-training can bridge the gap. Our code is available at https://github.com/fangda-ye/Deep-Report.

Abstract:
Can generative agents be trusted in multimodal environments? Despite recent advances, agents remain limited in their ability to reason about safety, coherence, and trust across modalities. We introduce a reproducible simulation framework to evaluate generative agents in three aspects: (1) safety improvement over time via iterative plan revision in multimodal scenarios; (2) detection of unsafe activities across social contexts; and (3) social dynamics, measured through interaction and acceptance rates. These multimodal agents are evaluated using metrics that quantify plan revisions and unsafe-to-safe conversions. Experiments show that while agents detect direct multimodal contradictions, they often fail to align local revisions with global safety, achieving only a 55% success rate in correcting unsafe plans. We release a dataset of 1,000 multimodal plans, yielding more than 600,000 simulation steps. Notably, 45% of unsafe actions are accepted when paired with misleading visual cues, revealing a strong tendency to overtrust visual content. Code is available at https://github.com/AdonaiVera/X-CASE

Abstract:
We design CIS-BWE, a novel adversarial Bandwidth Extension (BWE) framework that introduces two chaos-informed discriminators - Multi-Resolution Lyapunov Discriminator (MRLD) and Multi-Scale Detrended Fractal Analysis Discriminator (MSDFA) - for capturing the deterministic chaos from speech. MRLD exploits Lyapunov exponents to capture nonlinear chaotic fluctuations. MSDFA exploits detrended fluctuation analysis to quantify fractal-like, long-range temporal chaotic correlations. To the best of our knowledge, MRLD and MSDFA are included here for the first time with a complex-valued adversarial network to explore the chaotic study of speech reconstruction. We also introduce a novel complex-valued and dual-stream generator, which uses our newly proposed ConformerNeXt as a core block with Lattice interactions, acting as a gating mechanism by enabling controlled mixing of information across streams. We extensively optimize our design across five resolutions and use depth-wise separable convolutions to make our model lightweight yet powerful. Our CIS-BWE is tested with a de facto English and French dataset for clean and noisy speech for generalization. It achieves better performance across a total of nine subjective and objective evaluation metrics with a 40x reduction in discriminator size and overall 0.5x fewer parameters, establishing a new baseline in the BWE task.

Abstract:
Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval (RIR) targets retrieval settings where relevance is mediated by latent inferential links between a query and supporting evidence, rather than semantic similarity. Motivated by the emergent reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent work integrates these capabilities into the IR field, spanning the entire pipeline from benchmarks to retrievers and rerankers. Despite this progress, the field lacks a systematic framework to organize current efforts and articulate a clear path forward. To provide a clear roadmap for this rapidly growing yet fragmented area, this survey (1) systematizes existing RIR benchmarks by knowledge domains and modalities, providing a detailed analysis of the current landscape; (2) introduces a structured taxonomy that categorizes methods based on where and how reasoning is integrated into the retrieval pipeline, alongside an analysis of their trade-offs and practical applications; and (3) summarizes challenges and future directions to guide research in this evolving field.

Abstract:
Dialogue models falter in noisy, multi-speaker environments, often producing irrelevant responses and awkward turn-taking. We present AV-Dialog, the first multimodal dialog framework that uses both audio and visual cues to track the target speaker, predict turn-taking, and generate coherent responses. By combining acoustic tokenization with multi-task, multi-stage training on monadic, synthetic, and real audio-visual dialogue datasets, AV-Dialog achieves robust streaming transcription, semantically grounded turn-boundary detection and accurate responses, resulting in a natural conversational flow. Experiments show that AV-Dialog outperforms audio-only models under interference, reducing transcription errors, improving turn-taking prediction, and enhancing human-rated dialogue quality. These results highlight the power of seeing as well as hearing for speaker-aware interaction, paving the way for spoken dialogue agents that perform robustly in real-world, noisy environments.

Abstract:
When answering subjective questions, an ideal LLM should surface diverse plausible perspectives rather than favoring a single viewpoint, a characteristic known as pluralism. Recent studies show that modern LLMs optimized through preference alignment systematically favor certain positions on subjective queries, making pluralism evaluation increasingly important. However, existing evaluation methods focus dominantly on multiple-choice and question-answering tasks, leaving open-ended generation largely unaddressed.We propose PLURALEVAL, an evaluation framework that assesses LLM pluralism in open-ended generation by comparing outputs against free-form crowd responses. Our approach decomposes ground-truth responses into atomic, non-overlapping claims, then evaluates whether LLMs adequately cover this diverse claim space. We then introduce WildSCOPE, a multi-domain dataset of natural crowd responses, and demonstrate that PLURALEVAL captures novel insights, such as the collapse of pluralism through sycophancy, where LLM systematically degrades in overton pluralism when a user’s belief is revealed. Finally, we discuss the value and actionable insights for preserving and encouraging pluralism from LLM deployers’ side.

Abstract:
Advances in large language models (LLMs) enable many new innovations in education. However, evaluating the effectiveness of new technology requires real students, which is time-consuming and hard to scale up. Therefore, many recent works on LLM-powered tutoring solutions have used simulated students for both training and evaluation, often via simple prompting. Surprisingly, little work has been done to ensure or even measure the quality of simulated students. In this work, we formally define the student simulation task, propose a set of evaluation metrics that span linguistic, behavioral, and cognitive aspects, and benchmark a wide range of student simulation methods on these metrics. We experiment on a real-world math tutoring dialogue dataset, where both automated and human evaluation results show that prompting strategies for student simulation perform poorly; supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization yield much better but still limited performance, motivating future work on this challenging task.

Abstract:
Media narratives wield tremendous power in shaping public opinion, yet computational approaches struggle to capture the nuanced storytelling structures that communication theory emphasizes as central to how meaning is constructed. Existing approaches either miss subtle narrative patterns through coarse-grained analysis or require domain-specific taxonomies that limit scalability. To bridge this gap, we present a framework for inducing rich narrative schemas by jointly modeling events and characters via structured clustering. Our approach produces explainable narrative schemas that align with established framing theory while scaling to large corpora without exhaustive manual annotation.

Abstract:
Math word problems (MWPs) are critical K-12 educational tools, and customizing them to students’ interests and ability levels can enhance learning. However, teachers struggle to find time to customize MWPs for students given large class sizes and increasing burnout. We propose that LLMs can support math education by generating MWPs customized to student interests and math education standards. We use a joint human expert-LLM judge approach to evaluate over 11,000 MWPs generated by open and closed LLMs and develop the first teacher-annotated dataset for standards-aligned educational MWP generation. We show the value of our data by using it to train a 12B open model that matches the performance of larger and more capable open models. We also use our teacher-annotated data to train a text classifier that enables a 30B open LLM to outperform existing closed baselines without any training. Next, we show our models’ MWPs are more similar to human-written MWPs than those from existing models. We conclude by conducting the first study of customized LLM-generated MWPs with grade school students, finding they perform similarly on our models’ MWPs relative to human-written MWPs but consistently prefer our customized MWPs.

Abstract:
The field of AI research is advancing at an unprecedented pace, enabling automated hypothesis generation and experimental design across diverse domains such as biology, mathematics, and artificial intelligence. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in the availability of scalable advising systems capable of providing high-quality, well-reasoned feedback to refine proposed hypotheses and experimental designs. To address this challenge, we explore key factors that underlie the development of robust advising systems, including model size, data reweighting, context length, confidence estimation, and structured reasoning processes. Our findings reveal that a relatively small model, when equipped with a well-compressed literature database and a structured reasoning framework, can outperform powerful general-purpose language models such as Deepseek-R1 in terms of acceptance rates for self-ranked top-30% submissions to ICLR 2025. Moreover, when limited to high-confidence predictions, our system achieves an acceptance rate exceeding 90% on the ICLR 2025 test set, underscoring its potential to significantly enhance the quality and efficiency of hypothesis generation and experimental design.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents deployed for real-world tasks face a fundamental dilemma: user requests are underspecified, yet agents must decide whether to act on incomplete information or interrupt users for clarification. Existing approaches either rely on brittle confidence thresholds that require task-specific tuning, or fail to account for the varying stakes of different decisions. We introduce a decision-theoretic framework that resolves this trade-off through the Value of Information (VoI), enabling agents to dynamically weigh the expected utility gain from asking questions against the cognitive cost imposed on users. Our inference-time method requires no hyperparameter tuning and adapts seamlessly across contexts—from casual games to medical diagnosis. Experiments across four diverse domains (20 Questions, medical diagnosis, flight booking, and e-commerce) show that VoI consistently matches or exceeds the best manually-tuned baselines, achieving up to 1.36 utility points higher in high-cost settings. This work provides a parameter-free framework for adaptive agent communication that explicitly balances task risk, query ambiguity, and user effort.

Abstract:
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) predict through human-interpretable concepts, but they typically output point concept probabilities that conflate epistemic uncertainty (reducible model underspecification) with aleatoric uncertainty (irreducible input ambiguity). This makes concept-level uncertainty hard to interpret and, more importantly, hard to act upon. We introduce (Credal Ensemble Concept Estimation), a CBM framework that decomposes concept uncertainty by construction. represents each concept as a credal prediction (a probability interval), derives epistemic uncertainty from disagreement across diverse concept heads, and estimates aleatoric uncertainty via a dedicated ambiguity output trained to match annotator disagreement when available. The resulting signals support prescriptive decisions: automate low-uncertainty cases, prioritize data collection for high-epistemic cases, route high-aleatoric cases to human review, and abstain when both are high. Across several tasks, we show that epistemic uncertainty is positively associated with prediction errors, whereas aleatoric uncertainty closely tracks annotator disagreement, providing guidance beyond error correlation. Our implementation is available at the following link: https://github.com/Tankiit/Credal_Sets/tree/ensemble-credal-cbm

Abstract:
To close the gap between LLM-based agents and humans in planning and reasoning, agents need large-scale, diverse environments for continuous learning—yet building such environments is itself prohibitively expensive. We present C-World, an environment creation system that enables users to build agent environments on demand. We define a complete agent environment through four components: an Action Space of 5,571 format-unified tools across 204 common applications, a Task Distribution engine that synthesizes long-horizon workflows with wild constraints, a Transition Function implemented as a state controller that injects realistic failures and perturbations, and a Reward Signal combining verifiable metrics with LLM-based judgment. C-World operates in two modes: a realistic mode grounded in live API execution, and a synthesized mode powered by the World Engine, which approximates tool behavior without live service access, enabling scalable environment creation—including environments for domains and tools that do not yet exist in the real world. Evaluation of nine state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that planning ability is uniformly strong but execution remains the bottleneck, and that constraint following—not tool invocation—is the dominant failure mode. The World Engine achieves Spearman 𝜌 = 0.883 ranking correlation with real execution, and fine-tuning on just 1,170 C-World trajectories outperforms baselines trained on 119k samples, demonstrating C-World’s dual value as a rigorous evaluation environment and a scalable data engine. Our code and data are available at https://ziqiao-git.github.io/C-World/.

Abstract:
Existing works on defending against LLM backdoor attacks rely on either auxiliary models or safety-related datasets for defending against backdoor attacks on large language models, which are not always available. To address these challenges, we propose our we propose our Contrastive-Selective Activation Decomposition and Steering (CS-ADS), which contrasts relatively more benign and poisoned settings to decompose the feature vectors for steering without relying on additional auxiliary models or datasets. With such disentangled vectors for remediation, our method can achieve feasible defense qualities even better than dataset-based contrastive steering strategies. This novel decomposition-based solution is motivated by the key insight that feature representations of prompt pairs can encode the same benign semantics in different proportions, even when both prompt pairs are similarly backdoored. Such discrepancies allow our method to identify effective remediation directions for steering the generation process, thereby preventing undesired outputs. We evaluate CS-ADS against multiple state-of-the-art backdoor attacks, and experimental results show that CS-ADS provides effective defense across settings.

Abstract:
Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) such as DPO simplify RLHF by optimizing policies directly from preference pairs. However, the Bradley–Terry probability-gap objective can induce likelihood displacement and, under weak KL constraints, may even reduce the probability of preferred responses, while implicit rewards can be limited in generalizaiton. We propose Reward Alignment Optimization (RAO), a point-wise direct alignment method that uses an explicit reward model to specify exact target generation probabilities and align the policy offline towards them. Our key insight is a theoretical principle we call "prefix consistency", which links the normalization terms of prompts that share a prefix. Leveraging this property, RAO decouples target reward differentials from bias terms, prevents decreasing preferred-response probabilities, and better exploits reward information both within and across prompts. Extensive experiments on multiple base LLMs show that RAO consistently outperforms existing DAAs while enabling controllable target probability distributions.

Abstract:
Multi-constraint planning involves identifying, evaluating, and refining candidate plans while satisfying multiple, potentially conflicting constraints. Existing large language model (LLM) approaches face fundamental limitations in this domain. Pure reasoning paradigms, which rely on long natural language chains, are prone to inconsistency, error accumulation, and prohibitive cost as constraints compound. Conversely, LLMs combined with coding- or solver-based strategies lack flexibility: they often generate problem-specific code from scratch or depend on fixed solvers, failing to capture generalizable logic across diverse problems.To alleviate these issues, we introduce the Scalable Code Planning Engine (SCOPE), a systematic framework that disentangles query-specific problem reasoning from generic code execution. SCOPE first transforms input queries into optimized structured representations, capturing the interdependent constraints, and then autonomously generates reusable solver functions (Combination, Filter, and Deliver) that provide consistent and reliable execution across diverse problems. SCOPE achieves state-of-the-art performance while lowering cost and latency. For example, with GPT-4o, it reaches 93.1% success on TravelPlanner, a 61.6% gain over the best baseline (CoT) while cutting inference cost by 1.4 times and time by approximately 4.67 times. Code is available at https://github.com/DerrickGXD/SCOPE.

Abstract:
Benchmark-based evaluation is the de facto standard for comparing large language models (LLMs). However, its reliability is increasingly threatened by test set contamination, where test samples or their close variants leak into training data and artificially inflate reported performance. To address this issue, prior work has explored two main lines of mitigation. One line attempts to identify and remove contaminated benchmark items before evaluation, but this inevitably alters the evaluation set itself and becomes unreliable when contamination is moderate or severe. The other line preserves the benchmark and instead suppresses contaminated behavior at evaluation time; however, such interventions often interfere with normal inference and lead to noticeable performance degradation on clean inputs. We propose DeconIEP, a decontamination framework that operates entirely during evaluation by applying small, bounded perturbations in the input embedding space. Guided by a relatively less-contaminated reference model, DeconIEP learns an instance-adaptive perturbation generator that steers the evaluated model away from memorization-driven shortcut pathways. Across multiple open-weight LLMs and benchmarks, extensive empirical results show that DeconIEP achieves strong decontamination effectiveness while incurring only minimal degradation in benign utility.

Abstract:
Spoken dialogue systems powered by large language models have demonstrated remarkable abilities in understanding human speech and generating appropriate spoken responses.However, these systems struggle with end-turn detection (ETD)—the ability to distinguish between user turn completion and hesitation. This limitation often leads to premature or delayed responses, disrupting the flow of spoken conversations.In this paper, we introduce the OpenETD Dataset, the first public dataset for end-turn detection. The OpenETD dataset consists of both synthetic speech data generated with text-to-speech models and real-world speech data collected from web sources. We also propose SpeculativeETD, a novel collaborative inference framework that balances efficiency and accuracy to improve real-time ETD in resource-constrained environments. Our approach jointly employs a lightweight GRU-based model, which rapidly detects the non-speaking units in real-time on local devices, and a high-performance Wav2vec-based model running on the server to make a more challenging classification of distinguishing turn ends from mere pauses. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed SpeculativeETD significantly improves ETD accuracy while keeping the required computations low.

Abstract:
Understanding how discussion dynamics shape team creativity has been limited by the difficulty of measuring process at scale. We introduce Trace, a corpus of 309 group discussions from 103 teams (460 participants) across six creative problem-solving tasks. The dataset follows an input-process-output framework, integrating team composition (demographics, personalities), full discussion transcripts, and creativity outcomes. Using sentence embeddings and factor analysis, we identify four interpretable discussion dimensions: Coherence , Exploration , Convergence , and Participation . Analysis reveals a depth-breadth trade-off: coherent idea development inversely relates to semantic exploration. Larger teams explore more broadly but converge less effectively while team diversity shapes participation patterns more than discussion content. Novelty and usefulness in the creativity outcomes follow distinct pathways: Exploration and Convergence predict novelty, whereas Coherence predicts usefulness. These findings ground our understanding of how teams talk their way to creative solutions and provide guidance for designing multiagent systems.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising paradigm for accelerating large language model inference by leveraging a lightweight draft model to generate multiple candidate tokens. However, existing methods often incur substantial training overhead to mitigate information misalignment between autoregressive draft model training and decoding. To address this challenge, we propose EDSD, an Entropy-Driven Speculative Decoding framework that uses entropy as a unified, interpretable signal for both draft model training and architectural design. EDSD drives the draft model to progressively align with the target model in an easy-to-hard manner while establishing token-level alignment as a dominant design principle. Extensive experiments on seven LLMs demonstrate that EDSD improves training efficiency by 24.8%, increases the average acceptance length by 4.0%, and achieves a 4.1% speedup compared to state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, EDSD improves robustness to system prompt variations by more than 5x. Our findings establish entropy-driven alignment as an effective and principled foundation for efficient speculative decoding.

Abstract:
Tokenizers play a crucial role in determining the performance, training efficiency, and the inference cost of Large Language Models (LLMs). Designing effective tokenizers for multilingual LLMs is particularly challenging due to diverse scripts and rich morphological variation. While subword methods like Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) are widely adopted, their effectiveness in multilingual settings remains underexplored. We present MUTANT, a recipe for building multilingual tokenizers, with careful vocabulary and training data design, language-aware pre-tokenization, and subword and multiword aware training. We also introduce MUTANT-Indic, a tokenizer for India-specific multilingual LLMs, that produces linguistically coherent tokens and achieves state-of-the-art performance. Evaluated across English, Indian languages and code data, our tokenizer improves the average fertility score by 39.5% over LLaMA4 and by 18% over Sutra (the current best). This translates to 44% improvement in inference throughput over LLaMA4 while maintaining comparable performance on English and Indic benchmarks. We present detailed ablations across tokenizer training data size, vocabulary size, merging techniques, and pre-tokenization strategies, demonstrating the robustness of our design choices.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have become a popular approach for simulating human behaviors, yet it remains unclear if LLMs are necessary for all simulation tasks. We study a broad family of close-ended simulation tasks, with applications from survey prediction to test-taking, and show that a graph neural network can match or surpass strong LLM-based methods. We introduce Graph-basEd Models for Human Simulation (GEMS) which formulates close-ended simulation as link prediction on a heterogeneous graph of individuals and choices. Across three datasets and three evaluation settings, GEMS matches or outperforms the strongest LLM-based methods while using three orders of magnitude fewer parameters. These results suggest that graph-based modeling can complement LLMs as an efficient and transparent approach to simulating human behaviors. Code is available at https://github.com/schang-lab/gems.

Abstract:
Understanding a discourse requires tracking entities and the relations that hold between them. While Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well on relational reasoning, the mechanism by which they bind entities, relations, and attributes remains unclear. We study discourse-level relational binding and show that LLMs encode it via a Cell-based Binding Representation (CBR): a low-dimensional linear subspace in which each “cell” corresponds to an entity–relation index pair, and bound attributes are retrieved from the corresponding cell during inference. Using controlled multi-sentence data annotated with entity and relation indices, we identify the CBR subspace by decoding these indices from attribute-token activations with Partial Least Squares regression. Across domains and two model families, the indices are linearly decodable and form a grid-like geometry in the projected space. We further find that context-specific CBR representations are related by translation vectors in activation space, enabling cross-context transfer. Finally, activation patching shows that manipulating this subspace systematically changes relational predictions and that perturbing it disrupts performance, providing causal evidence that LLMs rely on CBR for relational binding.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can learn both useful knowledge and harmful stereotypes, making bias evaluation essential.Existing frameworks fall into two types: those considering reasoning steps (Thinking Process-Aware Evaluation, TPAE) and those focusing only on final outputs (Straight-to-the-Answer Evaluation, SAE).Prior TPAE studies showed effectiveness in assessing gender bias but relied on template-based, word-counting prompts, limiting generalization to other bias types, languages, and reasoning-based methods.In this study, we introduce MBTP, a multilingual social bias benchmark that incorporates human-generated pro- and anti-stereotype reasoning as part of the thinking process, and propose a few-shot meta-evaluation method that enables scalable bias assessment without model fine-tuning.From experiments evaluating 13 social bias categories across 8 languages, we find that human-generated thinking consistently yields higher-quality evaluations than LLM-generated or template-based approaches.Furthermore, TPAE demonstrates superior performance over SAE, highlighting the importance of considering reasoning processes in bias evaluation.We will release the MBTP dataset upon paper acceptance.

Abstract:
The Plain Writing Act in the United States requires government documents to be written in clear and simple language. However, existing summarization systems struggle to address diverse linguistic and cognitive barriers among general readers. We propose NRLB (No Reader Left Behind), a unified multi-agent framework for plain language summarization that simulates three representative reader groups: elementary school students, non-native speakers, and readers with attention deficits. NRLB integrates template-based planning with an iterative feedback loop guided by simulated readers and domain expert revision to address comprehension barriers such as unknown terms, missing contexts, and confusing sentences. Evaluations across multiple datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in both readability and factuality. Human evaluation further supports these findings, with annotator preference rates ranging from 55% to 76%, highlighting NRLB’s ability to generate summaries that are both faithful to the source and accessible to a wide range of readers.

Abstract:
Rhetorical questions are asked not to seek information but to persuade or signal stance. How large language models internally represent them remains unclear. We analyze rhetorical questions in LLM representations using linear probes on two social-media datasets with different discourse contexts, and find that rhetorical signals emerge early and are most stably captured by last-token representations. Rhetorical questions are linearly separable from information-seeking questions within datasets, and remain detectable under cross-dataset transfer, reaching AUROC around 0.7-0.8. However, we demonstrate that transferability does not simply imply a shared representation. Probes trained on different datasets produce different rankings when applied to the same target corpus, with overlap among the top-ranked instances often below 0.2. Qualitative analysis shows that these divergences correspond to distinct rhetorical phenomena: some probes capture discourse-level rhetorical stance embedded in extended argumentation, while others emphasize localized, syntax-driven interrogative acts. Together, these findings suggest that rhetorical questions in LLM representations are encoded by multiple linear directions emphasizing different cues, rather than a single shared direction.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in table-based question answering (table QA) have been driven by the development of table-specific reasoning strategies for leveraging large language models. Previous works employ sub-table-based reasoning, which involves matching query-relevant table values and aggregating them into sub-tables for precise reasoning. However, these approaches are limited to scenarios with query-relevant single tables, failing to handle real-world table QA settings that involve noisy multi-table sets. To address the challenges of real-world table QA, we propose EASE: Entity-Aware Sub-table Generation for REal-world Multi-table QA framework. Given a noisy multi-table set, EASE first extracts key entities from the question to construct a sub-table schema. It then populates this schema by utilizing a selected set of column values from the noisy multi-table set, thereby facilitating efficient and effective sub-table-based reasoning. We introduce a Noisy Multi-table QA dataset and conduct extensive experiments to evaluate EASE’s effectiveness on real-world table QA. Our results demonstrate that EASE effectively filters out irrelevant information while incorporating pertinent table values, leading to efficient and effective performance on real-world table QA. Our dataset can be found https://github.com/Metalchaos8527/ease_noisy_multi-table_qa.git

Abstract:
Unified multimodal models aim to jointly enable visual understanding and generation, yet current benchmarks rarely examine their true integration. Existing evaluations either treat the two abilities in isolation or overlook tasks that inherently couple them. To address this gap, we present Uni-MMMU , a comprehensive and discipline-aware benchmark that systematically unfolds the bidirectional synergy between generation and understanding across eight reasoning-centric domains, including science, coding, mathematics, and puzzles. Each task is bidirectionally coupled , demanding models to (i) leverage conceptual understanding to guide precise visual synthesis, or (ii) utilize generation as a cognitive scaffold for analytical reasoning. Uni-MMMU incorporates verifiable intermediate reasoning steps, unique ground truths, and a reproducible scoring protocol for both textual and visual outputs. Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art unified, generation-only, and understanding-only models, we reveal substantial performance disparities and cross-modal dependencies, offering new insights into when and how these abilities reinforce one another, and establishing a reliable foundation for advancing unified models.

Abstract:
Linguistic steganography based on language models typically assumes that steganographic texts are transmitted without alteration, making them fragile to even minor modifications. While previous work mitigates this fragility by limiting the context window, it significantly compromises text quality. In this paper, we propose the anchored sliding window (ASW) framework to improve imperceptibility and robustness. In addition to the latest tokens, the prompt and a bridge context are anchored within the context window, encouraging the model to compensate for the excluded tokens. We formulate the optimization of the bridge context as a variant of prompt distillation, which we further extend using self-distillation strategies. Experiments show that our ASW significantly and consistently outperforms the baseline method in text quality, imperceptibility, and robustness across diverse settings. The code is available at github.com/ryehr/ASW_steganography.

Abstract:
Instruction-tuning datasets often contain substantial redundancy and low-quality samples, necessitating effective data selection methods. We propose an instruction data selection framework based on weighted in-context influence (wICI), which measures how effectively each candidate example reduces instruction-following difficulty for semantically related peers. Through systematic experiments, we address three key questions: what constitutes effective instruction tuning data from an in-context perspective, whether sample difficulty correlates with in-context influence, and how in-context influence translates to instruction tuning effectiveness. Experiments across multiple models and benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing baselines under constrained data budgets, while empirically showing that sample difficulty negatively correlates with in-context influence.

Abstract:
We propose a lightweight, modular framework for hallucination detection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems, addressing the critical challenge where logical dependencies span across fragmented retrieval results. To address the inherent limitations of compact models in processing long-context information and performing multi-hop reasoning, our approach systematically analyzes the logical relationships among retrieved documents within the vector space. By capturing these geometric patterns through a novel feature extraction framework, the proposed classifier significantly enhances context-aware hallucination detection without requiring complex architectures or pre-training on datasets. Meanwhile, to evaluate multi-document reasoning, we release HotPotQA-derived, a hallucination dataset preserving separate retrieved texts. Experimental results on HotPotQA-derived and several open-source datasets demonstrate that our framework can achieve results comparable to or even surpassing those of large language models (LLMs) on the task of hallucination detection.

Abstract:
Simultaneous speech translation (SST) generates translations while receiving partial speech input. Recent advances show that large language models (LLMs) can substantially improve SST quality, but at the cost of high computational overhead. To reduce this cost, prior work reformulates SST as a multi-turn dialogue task, enabling full reuse of the LLM’s key–value (KV) cache and eliminating redundant feature recomputation. However, this approach relies on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data in dialogue form, for which few human annotations exist, and existing synthesis methods cannot guarantee data quality. In this work, we propose a Hierarchical Policy Optimization (HPO) approach that post-train models trained on imperfect SFT data. We introduce a hierarchical reward that balances translation quality and latency objectives. Experiments on English to Chinese/German/Japanese demonstrate improvements of over +7 COMET score and +1.25 MetricX score at a latency of 1.5 seconds. Comprehensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of different quality rewards, hierarchical reward formulations, and segmentation strategies.

Abstract:
Spreadsheets are central to real-world applications such as enterprise reporting, auditing, and scientific data management. Despite their ubiquity, existing large language model based approaches typically treat tables as plain text, overlooking critical layout cues and visual semantics. Moreover, real-world spreadsheets are often massive in scale, exceeding the input length that LLMs can efficiently process. To address these challenges, we propose SpreadsheetAgent, a two-stage multi-agent framework for spreadsheet understanding that adopts a step-by-step reading and reasoning paradigm. Instead of loading the entire spreadsheet at once, SpreadsheetAgent incrementally interprets localized regions through multiple modalities, including code execution results, images, and LaTeX tables. The method first constructs a structural sketch and row/column summaries, and then performs task-driven reasoning over this intermediate representation in the Solving Stage. To further enhance reliability, we design a verification module that validates extracted structures via targeted inspections, reducing error propagation and ensuring trustworthy inputs for downstream reasoning. Extensive experiments on two spreadsheet datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. With GPT-OSS-120B, SpreadsheetAgent achieves 38.16% on Spreadsheet Bench, outperforming the ChatGPT Agent baseline (35.27%) by 2.89 absolute points. These results highlight the potential of SpreadsheetAgent to advance robust and scalable spreadsheet understanding in real-world applications. Code is available at https://github.com/renhouxing/SpreadsheetAgent.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great promise in tool-making, yet existing frameworks often struggle to efficiently construct reliable toolsets and are limited to single-task settings. To address these challenges, we propose GATE (Graph-based Adaptive Tool Evolution), an adaptive framework that dynamically constructs and evolves a hierarchical graph of reusable tools across multiple scenarios. We evaluate GATE on open-ended tasks (Minecraft), agent-based tasks (TextCraft, DABench), and code generation tasks (MATH, Date, TabMWP). Our results show that GATE achieves up to 4.3× faster milestone completion in Minecraft compared to the previous state-of-the-art method, and provides an average improvement of 9.23% over existing tool-making methods in code generation tasks and 10.03% in agent tasks. Further analysis shows that GATE exhibits strong adaptive evolution capabilities, effectively balancing tool quantity, complexity, and functionality while maintaining high efficiency. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ayanami2003/GATE.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) exhibit powerful generative capabilities but frequently produce hallucinations that compromise output reliability. Fine tuning on annotated data devoid of hallucinations offers the most direct solution, while its high computational cost motivates recent representation-based methods, which focus on mitigating hallucinatory components within hidden representations. Though efficient, we empirically observe that these methods degrade general generation capacity due to incomplete extraction of hallucination components and non-selective parameter updates. To address these limitations, we propose MPD, a dual-stage framework for mitigating hallucinations without performance degradation. Specifically, our MPD relies on two essential factors: (1) semantic-aware component disentanglement to extract pure hallucination components, and (2) interpretable parameter updates that selectively modify parameters most relevant to hallucination. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MPD achieves state-of-the-art performance, reducing hallucinations by 23.4% while maintaining 97.4% of general generative capability as evaluated on LLaVA-Bench and MME, with no additional computational cost.

Abstract:
Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are a prominent tool in mechanistic interpretability (MI) for decomposing neural network activations into interpretable features. However, the aspiration to identify a canonical set of features is challenged by the observed inconsistency of learned SAE features across different training runs, undermining reproducibility and complicating model comparison. We study run-to-run feature consistency in SAEs and argue that it should be reported as a standard evaluation axis alongside reconstruction and sparsity. We propose the Pairwise Dictionary Mean Correlation Coefficient (PW-MCC) as an assignment-based metric to quantify consistency and demonstrate that high levels are achievable (PW-MCC ≈ 0.80 for TopK SAEs on LLM activations) with appropriate architectural choices.Our contributions include: (i) theoretical grounding for strong consistency in the idealized setting of TopK SAEs; (ii) synthetic validation using a model organism, which verifies PW-MCC as a reliable proxy for ground-truth recovery; and (iii) empirical analysis on LLM activations, where PW-MCC correlates with the similarity of automatically generated natural-language feature explanations.

Abstract:
Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) has emerged as a critical technique for customizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to meet diverse downstream applications. However, recent studies have revealed that IFT can compromise the built-in security mechanisms of LLMs, thereby posing significant security risks. Although defense methods targeting various training stages have been proposed, they either face challenges in practical deployment or exhibit instability and limited performance gains. In our study, we propose a novel SWAT method that introduces a key idea: shifting more of the learning burden onto security-robust parameters. To this end, our study investigates how module-level parameters affect LLMs’ internal security feature space, aiming to uncover robustness patterns in parameters. Guided by this analysis, we identify a robust module set (Mods_Rob) that exhibits minimal effects on LLMs’ security feature space. Leveraging this insight, SWAT proceeds in two phases: (1) a warm-up phase that preferentially trains Mods_Rob to learn low-level features with minimal security risk, followed by (2) standard tuning to achieve optimal task performance. Across diverse knowledge-intensive datasets, scenarios, and LLMs, SWAT substantially reduces security risks without sacrificing task performance gains.

Abstract:
Multi-hop claim verification is inherently challenging, requiring multi-step reasoning to construct verification chains while iteratively searching for information to uncover hidden bridging facts. This process is fundamentally interleaved, as effective reasoning relies on dynamically retrieved evidence, while effective search demands reasoning to refine queries based on partial information. To achieve this, we propose Hierarchical Agent Reasoning and Information Search (HARIS), explicitly modeling the coordinated process of reasoning-driven searching and search-informed reasoning. HARIS consists of a high-level reasoning agent that focuses on constructing the main verification chain, generating factual questions when more information is needed, and a low-level search agent that iteratively retrieves more information, refining its search based on intermediate findings. This design allows each agent to specialize in its respective task, enhancing verification accuracy and interpretability. HARIS is trained using reinforcement learning with outcome-based rewards. Experimental results on the EX-FEVER and HOVER benchmarks demonstrate that HARIS achieves strong performance, greatly advancing multi-hop claim verification.

Abstract:
The powerful generative capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs) has instigated a paradigm shift in recommendation. However, existing generative models (e.g., OneRec) operate as implicit predictors, critically lacking the capacity for explicit and controllable reasoning—a key advantage of LLMs. To bridge this gap, we propose OneRec-Think, a unified framework that seamlessly integrates dialogue, reasoning, and personalized recommendation. OneRec-Think incorporates: (1) Itemic Alignment: cross-modal Item-Textual Alignment for semantic grounding; (2) Reasoning Activation: Reasoning Scaffolding to activate LLM reasoning within the recommendation context; and (3) Reasoning Enhancement, where we design a recommendation-specific reward function that accounts for the multi-validity nature of user preferences. Experiments across public benchmarks show state-of-the-art performance. Moreover, our proposed "Think-Ahead" architecture enables effective industrial deployment, achieving a 0.159% gain in APP Stay Time and validating the practical efficacy of the model’s explicit reasoning capability.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) are typically trained using reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) to enhance their reasoning abilities. In this paradigm, policies are updated using both positive and negative self-generated rollouts, which correspond to distinct sample polarities. In this paper, we provide a systematic investigation into how these sample polarities affect RLVR training dynamics and behaviors. We find that positive samples sharpen existing correct reasoning patterns, while negative samples encourage exploration of new reasoning paths. We further explore how adjusting the advantage values of positive and negative samples at both the polarity level and the token level affects RLVR training. Based on these insights, we propose an Adaptive and Asymmetric token-level Advantage shaping method for Policy Optimization, namely A3PO, that more precisely allocates advantage signals to key tokens across different polarities. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Speech codecs that convert continuous speech signals into discrete tokens have become essential for speech language models. However, existing codecs struggle to balance high-quality reconstruction with semantically rich representations, limiting their effectiveness in both generative and understanding tasks. In this work, we propose SAC , a neural speech codec with semantic-acoustic dual-stream quantization. By disentangling semantic and acoustic modeling into two dedicated streams, SAC enables each to be optimized for its respective role. Comprehensive evaluations show that SAC achieves strong reconstruction performance across diverse bitrates under both clean and noisy conditions, with particularly high scores on UTMOS and WER, indicating superior naturalness and intelligibility. Moreover, SAC substantially surpasses prior codecs in semantic representation, approaching the level of continuous self-supervised embeddings. When used as a tokenizer for LLM-based text-to-speech, SAC enables a single-stage autoregressive (AR) TTS model that clearly outperforms state-of-the-art AR systems. Our disentanglement analysis further validates the effectiveness of the dual-stream design, offering new potential for controllable speech generation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) require frequent knowledge updates to reflect changing facts and mitigate hallucinations. To meet this demand, lifelong knowledge editing has emerged as a continual approach to modify specific pieces of knowledge without retraining the entire model. Existing parameter-editing methods struggle with stability during sequential edits due to catastrophic forgetting. While retrieval-based approaches are proposed to alleviate this issue, their applicability remains limited across various datasets because of high training costs. To address these limitations and enhance scalability in lifelong settings, we propose LightEdit. Our framework first selects relevant knowledge from retrieved information to modify the query effectively. It then incorporates a decoding strategy to suppress the model’s original knowledge probabilities, thereby enabling efficient edits based on the selected information. Extensive experiments on ZSRE, Counterfact, and RIPE benchmarks demonstrate that LightEdit outperforms existing lifelong knowledge editing methods. Furthermore, by minimizing training costs, LightEdit achieves cost-effective scalability, enabling easy adaptation to various datasets.

Abstract:
While guided decoding, especially value-guided methods, has emerged as a cost-effective alternative for controlling language model outputs without re-training models, its effectiveness is limited by the accuracy of the value function. We identify that this inaccuracy stems from a core distributional gap: existing methods train static value functions on trajectories sampled exclusively from the base policy, which inherently confines their training to a narrow and suboptimal view of the potential output space. We propose Iterative Value Refinement, a novel framework designed to bridge this gap. It employs Value Exploration to provide a more comprehensive and robust training signal, complemented by Iterative Self-Refinement, which uses the improved value function from one iteration to guide the generation of higher-quality data for the next. Extensive experiments on text summarization, multi-turn dialogue, and instruction following demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in aligning language models. Our approach not only achieves alignment but also significantly reduces computational costs by leveraging principled value function optimization for efficient and effective control.

Abstract:
Evaluating the quality of LLM-generated reasoning traces in expert domains (e.g., law) is essential for ensuring credibility and explainability, yet remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of such reasoning tasks. We introduce LEGIT (LEGal Issue Trees), a novel large-scale (24K instances) expert-level legal reasoning dataset with an emphasis on reasoning trace evaluation. We convert court judgments into hierarchical trees of opposing parties’ arguments and the court’s conclusions, which serve as rubrics for evaluating the issue coverage and correctness of the reasoning traces. We verify the reliability of these rubrics via human expert annotations and comparison with coarse, less informative rubrics. Using the LEGIT dataset, we show that (1) LLMs’ legal reasoning ability is seriously affected by both legal issue coverage and correctness, and that (2) retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and RL with rubrics bring complementary benefits for legal reasoning abilities, where RAG improves overall reasoning capability, whereas RL improves correctness albeit with reduced coverage.

Abstract:
Long-horizon tasks that require sustained reasoning and multiple tool interactions remain challenging for LLM agents: small errors compound across steps, and even state-of-the-art models often hallucinate or lose coherence. We identify context management as the central bottleneck—extended histories cause agents to overlook critical evidence or become distracted by irrelevant information, thus failing to replan or reflect from previous mistakes. To address this, we propose COMPASS (Context-Organized Multi-Agent Planning and Strategy System), a lightweight hierarchical framework that separates tactical execution, strategic oversight, and context organization into three specialized components: (1) a Main Agent that performs reasoning and tool use, (2) a Meta-Thinker that monitors progress and issues strategic interventions, and (3) a Context Manager that maintains concise, relevant progress briefs for different reasoning stages. Across three challenging benchmarks—GAIA, BrowseComp, and Humanity’s Last Exam—COMPASS improves accuracy by up to 20% relative to both single- and multi-agent baselines. We further introduce a test-time scaling extension that elevates performance to match established DeepResearch agents, and a post-training pipeline that delegates context management to smaller models for enhanced efficiency.

Abstract:
In continual instruction tuning (CIT) scenarios, where new instruction tuning data continuously arrive in an online streaming manner, training delays from large-scale data significantly hinder real-time adaptation. Data selection can mitigate this overhead, but existing strategies often rely on pre-trained reference models, which are impractical in CIT setups since future data are unknown. Recent reference model-free online sample selection methods address this, but typically select a fixed number of samples per batch (e.g., top-k), making them vulnerable to distribution shifts where informativeness varies across batches. To address these limitations, we propose OASIS, an adaptive online sample selection approach for CIT that (1) selects informative samples by estimating each sample’s informativeness relative to all previously seen data, beyond batch-level constraints, and (2) minimizes informative redundancy of selected samples through iterative selection score updates. Experiments on various large foundation models show that , using only 25% of the data, achieves comparable performance to full-data training and outperforms the state-of-the-art sampling methods.

Abstract:
Recent research empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) as multi-turn search agents to iteratively retrieve and generate outputs until complex tasks are solved. However, the contexts of multi-turn search agents are lengthy and complex. For example, the retrieved set of documents in each turn would inevitably introduce irrelevant information that distracts LLMs, referring to context interference, potentially hindering the reliability and efficiency of search agents. Therefore, we conduct a systematic study on context interference in multi-turn search agents, focusing on investigating i) which parts of the context of search agents will contribute to the context interference, ii) how to refine the contexts of search agents to mitigate the interference, and iii) can incorporating context refinement into search agent training yield further improvements. We reveal that interference primarily arises from the latest retrieved documents. Based on the explored findings, we then introduce a distill-based context refiner to dynamically mitigate context interference for multi-turn search agents. Finally, we validate that incorporating context refinement into RL training pipelines of search agents can significantly enhance both reliability and efficiency. This study highlights the importance of mitigating context interference of search agents, inspiring a novel paradigm of “refine context and then generate” for AI agents.

Abstract:
Recent proprietary video generation models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in synthesizing highly realistic videos from textual instructions. Most open-source text-to-video models, however, still struggle to accurately simulate real-world physics and dynamic entity interactions. Existing approaches rely on scaling laws and large-scale, high-quality video datasets to implicitly learn physical dynamics, yet this paradigm is constrained by prohibitive costs and the burdensome demands of data curation. Motivated by this, we propose a novel framework that integrates graph-structured temporal knowledge into video latent diffusion models to enhance compositional generation and interaction fidelity. Our framework constructs video scene graphs specifically designed to capture entity relationships, temporal dynamics, and global scene context. These graph-structured representations guide the generation process through cross-attention mechanisms. Additionally, we introduce Graph-Aligned Denoising Loss (GADL), a training objective that ensures adherence to conditioned graphs by incorporating node modification tasks within the denoising process, leveraging synchronized edited video-graph pairs. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that incorporating graph-structured knowledge significantly enhances compositionality and the accurate portrayal of real-world interactions in generated videos.

Abstract:
Deception detection is of great significance for ensuring information security and conducting public opinion analysis, with personality factors and emotion cues playing a critical role. However, existing methods lack sample-level dynamic annotations for emotions and personality. In this paper, we propose an innovative multi-model multi-prompt annotation scheme and a strict label quality evaluation standard, and establish a multimodal joint detection dataset DDEP for deception, emotion, and personality. Meanwhile, we propose Rel-DDEP, an adaptive reliability-weighted fusion framework. Our framework quantifies uncertainty by mapping modal features to a high-dimensional Gaussian distribution space. It then performs reliability-weighted fusion and incorporates an alignment module and a sorting constraint module to achieve joint detection of deception, emotion, and personality. Experimental results on the MDPE and DDEP datasets show that our Rel-DDEP significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art baseline models in three tasks. The F1 score of the deception detection increases by 2.53%, that of the emotion detection increases by 2.66%, and that of the personality detection increases by 9.30%. The experiments fully verify the necessity of annotating dynamic emotion and personality labels for each sample and the effectiveness of reliability-weighted fusion.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by providing access to external knowledge. However, current research primarily focuses on retrieval quality, often overlooking the critical ”integration bottleneck”: even when relevant documents are retrieved, LLMs frequently fail to utilize them effectively due to conflicts with their internal parametric knowledge. In this paper, we argue that implicitly resolving this conflict in a single generation pass is suboptimal. We introduce GuarantRAG, a framework that explicitly decouples reasoning from evidence integration. First, we generate an ”Inner-Answer” based solely on parametric knowledge to capture the model’s reasoning flow. Second, to guarantee faithful evidence extraction, we generate a ”Refer-Answer” using a novel Contrastive DPO objective. This objective treats the parametric Inner-Answer as a negative constraint and the retrieved documents as positive ground truth, forcing the model to suppress internal hallucinations in favor of external evidence during this phase. Finally, rather than naive concatenation or using the DPO trained model directly, we propose a joint decoding mechanism that dynamically fuses the logical coherence of the Inner-Answer with the factual precision of the Refer-Answer at the token level. Experiments on five QA benchmarks demonstrate that GuarantRAG improves accuracy by up to 12.1% and reduces hallucinations by 16.3% compared to standard and dynamic RAG baselines.

Abstract:
The prevalence of fake news on social media calls for automated fact-checking systems that deliver not only accurate verdicts but also faithful explanations. However, existing large language model (LLM)-based methods often overlook deceptive misinformation styles in generated explanations, producing unfaithful rationales that may mislead human judgment. They also rely heavily on external knowledge sources, which can introduce hallucinations and incur substantial latency, undermining both reliability and responsiveness in real-time settings. To address these limitations, we propose REason-guided Fact-checking with Latent EXplanations (REFLEX), a self-refining framework that explicitly controls reasoning style by anchoring explanations to the predicted verdict. REFLEX leverages self-disagreement veracity signals between a backbone model and its fine-tuned variant to construct steering vectors, thereby naturally disentangling factual content from stylistic cues. Experiments on a real-world benchmark show that REFLEX achieves state-of-the-art performance under LLaMA-series models using only 465 self-refined samples. Owing to its transferability, REFLEX also yields gains of up to 7.54 Macro-F1 points on in-the-wild data. Further analysis shows that our method effectively mitigates faithful hallucination, leading to both more reliable explanations and more accurate verdicts than prior explainable fact-checking approaches.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world settings, correctness alone is insufficient. Reliable deployment requires maintaining truthful beliefs under contextual perturbations. Existing evaluations largely rely on point-wise confidence like Self-Consistency, which can mask brittle belief. We show that even facts answered with perfect self-consistency can rapidly collapse under mild contextual interference. To address this gap, we propose Neighbor-Consistency Belief (NCB) , a structural measure of belief robustness that evaluates response coherence across a conceptual neighborhood. To validate the efficiency of NCB, we introduce a new cognitive stress-testing protocol that probes outputs stability under contextual interference. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that the performance of high-NCB data is relatively more resistant to interference. Finally, we present Structure-Aware Training (SAT) , which optimizes context-invariant belief structure and reduces long-tail knowledge brittleness by approximately 30% .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced Machine Translation (MT), applying them to linguistically complex domains-such as Social Network Services, literature etc. In these scenarios, translations often require handling non-literal expressions, leading to the inaccuracy of MT metrics. To systematically investigate the reliability of MT metrics, we first curate a meta-evaluation dataset focused on non-literal translations, namely MENT. MENT encompasses four non-literal translation domains and features source sentences paired with translations from diverse MT systems, with 7,530 human-annotated scores on translation quality. Experimental results reveal the inaccuracies of traditional MT metrics and the limitations of LLM-as-a-Judge, particularly the knowledge cutoff and score inconsistency problem. To mitigate these limitations, we propose RATE, a novel agentic translation evaluation framework, centered by a reflective Core Agent that dynamically invokes specialized sub-agents. Experimental results indicate the efficacy of RATE, achieving an improvement of at least 3.2 points in combined system- and segment-level correlation with human judgments compared with current methods. Further experiments demonstrate the robustness of RATE to general-domain MT evaluation. Code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/BITHLP/RATE.

Abstract:
Adapting large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages (LRLs) is constrained by the scarcity of task data and computational resources. Although Proxy Tuning offers a logit-level strategy for introducing scaling effects, it often fails in LRL settings because the large model’s weak LRL competence might overwhelm the knowledge of specialized smaller models. We thus propose TriMix, a test-time logit fusion framework that dynamically balances capabilities from three different sources: LRL competence from a continually pretrained small model, task competence from high-resource language instruction tuning, and the scaling benefits of large models. It is data- and compute-efficient, requiring no LRL task annotations, and only continual pretraining on a small model. Experiments across four model families and eight LRLs show that TriMix consistently outperforms single-model baselines and Proxy Tuning. Our analysis reveals that prioritizing the small LRL-specialized model’s logits is crucial for success, challenging the prevalent large-model-dominant assumption.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly tackle complex reasoning tasks, test-time scaling has become critical for enhancing capabilities. However, in agentic scenarios with frequent tool calls, the traditional generation-length-based definition breaks down: tool latency decouples inference time from generation length. We propose Timely Machine, redefining test-time as wall-clock time, where models dynamically adjust strategies based on time budgets. We introduce Timely-Eval, a benchmark spanning high-frequency tool calls, low-frequency tool calls, and time-constrained reasoning. By varying tool latency, we find smaller models excel with fast feedback through more interactions, while larger models dominate high-latency settings via superior interaction quality. Moreover, existing models fail to adapt reasoning to time budgets. We propose Timely-RL to address this gap. After cold-start supervised fine-tuning, we use reinforcement learning to enhance temporal planning. Timely-RL improves time budget awareness and consistently boosts performance across Timely-Eval. We hope our work offers a new perspective on test-time scaling for the agentic era.

Abstract:
Safety alignment—training large language models (LLMs) to refuse harmful requests while remaining helpful—is critical for responsible deployment. Prior work established that safety behaviors are governed by low-rank structures, suggesting parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) should be well-suited for alignment. However, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) consistently underperforms full fine-tuning and reinforcement learning on safety benchmarks. We attribute this gap to semantic entanglement: safety-relevant directions are intertwined with unrelated concepts due to polysemanticity, impeding implicit subspace identification. To address this, we propose SAILS (Safety Alignment via Interpretable Low-rank Subspace), which leverages Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to disentangle representations into monosemantic features, constructs an interpretable safety subspace from SAE decoder directions, and uses it to initialize LoRA adapters. Theoretically, we prove that SAE-based identification achieves arbitrarily small recovery error under monosemanticity assumptions, while direct identification suffers an irreducible error floor. Empirically, SAILS achieves up to 99.6% safety rates across multiple model families and scales, exceeding full fine-tuning and matching RLHF-based models, with only 0.2% of parameters updated and providing interpretability.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks but often generate harmful responses to malicious user queries. This paper investigates the underlying cause of these safety risks and shows that the issue lies in the reasoning structure itself. Based on this insight, we claim that effective safety alignment can be achieved by altering the reasoning structure. We propose AltTrain, a simple yet effective post-training method that explicitly alters the reasoning structure of LRMs. AltTrain is both practical and generalizable, requiring no complex reinforcement learning (RL) training or reward design—only supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with a lightweight 1K training examples. Experiments across LRM backbones and model sizes demon strate strong safety alignment, along with robust generalization across reasoning, QA, summarization, and multilingual setting.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for mitigating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs).However, the intrinsic heterogeneity between the retriever and the generator often leads to a mismatch between retrieved evidence and generation needs, hindering effective coordination.We argue that competition between discriminative retrieval and generative modeling can more effectively expose their mutual weaknesses and induce deeper interaction. Motivated by this insight, we propose CARL (Co-opetition AdveRsarial Learning), a framework that formulates retriever–generator training in RAG as a minimax game. In this game, the retriever is optimized to retrieve both useful and adversarially useless documents to challenge the generator, while the generator learns to identify useful evidence and remain robust to misleading retrievals to produce accurate answers.Experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that CARL consistently improves RAG performance, validating the effectiveness of adversarial co-opetition in enhancing retriever–generator synergy.

Abstract:
Professional financial reports serve as the cornerstone of investment decisions, demanding deep reasoning and multimodal synthesis. While recent deep research systems excel in open-domain search, they struggle with financial reporting, specifically in handling financial data, ensuring analytical depth, and integrating professional visualizations. To address this, we introduce FinSight , the first multi-agent framework for automate end-to-end professional, multimodal financial report. At its core, we propose the Code Agent with Variable Memory architecture, which unifies data, tools, and agents into a programmable variable space, enabling flexible data manipulation and reasoning through executable code. To guarantee report quality, FinSight incorporates a Two-Stage Writing Framework with Generative Retrieval. This mechanism first distills raw data into structured Chain-of-Analysis segments, and then progressively synthesizes them into a coherent, citation-aware, and multimodal narrative. Additionally, an Iterative Vision-Enhanced Mechanism leverages visual feedback to refine code-generated charts to expert standards. Experiments on company and industry-level tasks demonstrate that FinSight significantly outperforms leading deep research systems in factual accuracy, analytical depth, and presentation quality, demonstrating a clear path toward generating professional financial reports. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FinSight-5841.

Abstract:
Taxonomy Completion aims to automatically integrate new concepts into existing hierarchies. However, existing text-only methods suffer from a ”Sensory Gap”: they struggle to differentiate ambiguous definitions (e.g., Latte vs. Cappuccino) and miss visual grouping signals. Consequently, they often misinterpret lexical overlaps as hierarchical dependencies, leading to erroneous structural predictions. To bridge this, we propose VITC, a framework leveraging Visual Injection for Taxonomy Completion. By mapping synthesized images into intrinsic pseudo-tokens, we enable the text encoder to perform holistic structural reasoning. To address injection challenges, we introduce Adaptive Residual Fusion, which decouples magnitude from selection to prevent visual signals from being drowned out, and the Multimodal Guided Adaptive Reweighting strategy, which leverages cross-modal consensus (Mutual Rescue and Complementary Mining) to filter noise and identify hard negatives. Experiments on three datasets demonstrate that VITC achieves state-of-the-art performance, delivering an average absolute gain of over 19% in Hit@1. Code is available at https://github.com/nyh-a/VITC.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show strong potential for tackling complex tasks through collaborative intelligence. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) based methods provide promising approaches for enhancing MAS self-training by generating synthetic data, using Q-values to estimate agent contributions. However, relying solely on Q-values may misalign with the goal of selecting data most beneficial for MAS improvement. To address this discrepancy, we propose Data Influence-oriented Tree Search (DITS), a novel framework that incorporates influence scores to guide both tree search and data selection in data synthesis. By leveraging influence scores, we effectively identify the most impactful data for MAS improvement, thereby enhancing model performance. Furthermore, we derive a novel influence score estimation method tailored for non-differentiable metrics, significantly reducing computational overhead by calculating performance changes on the validation set. Extensive experiments on three different multi-agent tasks demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of the proposed methods. Notably, our findings reveal that allocating more resources to estimate influence scores, rather than Q-values, during data synthesis can more effectively and efficiently enhance model training. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DITS-F1C4/.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) have recently attracted significant attention for their ability to enhance diversity, controllability, and parallelism. However, their non-sequential, bidirectionally masked generation makes quality assessment difficult, underscoring the need for effective self-evaluation. In this work, we propose DiSE, a simple yet effective self-evaluation confidence quantification method for dLLMs. DiSE quantifies confidence by computing the probability of regenerating the tokens in the entire generated sequence, given the full context. This method enables more efficient and reliable quality assessment by leveraging token regeneration probabilities, facilitating both likelihood estimation and robust uncertainty quantification. Building upon DiSE, we further introduce a flexible-length generation framework, which adaptively controls the sequence length based on the model’s self-assessment of its own output. We analyze and validate the feasibility of DiSE from the perspective of dLLM generalization, and empirically demonstrate that DiSE is positively correlated with both semantic coherence and answer accuracy. Extensive experiments on likelihood evaluation, uncertainty quantification, and flexible-length generation further confirm the effectiveness of the proposed DiSE.

Abstract:
Understanding the impact of scientific publications is crucial for identifying breakthroughs and guiding future research. Traditional metrics based on citation counts often miss the nuanced ways a paper contributes to its field. In this work, we propose a new task: generating nuanced, expressive, and time-aware impact summaries that capture both praise (confirmation citations) and critique (correction citations) through the evolution of fine-grained citation intents. We introduce an evaluation framework tailored to this task, showing moderate to strong human correlation on subjective metrics such as insightfulness. Expert feedback from professors reveals a strong interest in these summaries and suggests future improvements. Data and code are made available.

Abstract:
Masked Diffusion Models (MDMs) have recently emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm for sequence generation. However, their performance is highly sensitive to the choice of decoding strategy. In this work, we reveal that prevalent uncertainty-based decoding strategies induce two decoding biases in MDMs: rigid boundary bias and trivial token bias. These biases limit the model’s reasoning ability and ultimately degrade generation quality. To address these challenges, we propose UNmasking Calibration for DecOding DEbiasing (UNCODE), a decoding calibration framework that regularizes uncertainty-based decoding by incorporating two complementary priors to shape global decoding trajectories and promote content informativeness. Extensive experiments on three advanced MDMs across seven reasoning- and planning-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that UNCODE consistently outperforms existing decoding strategies by more than 7%, while achieving performance comparable to autoregressive models of similar parameter scales. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Uncode .

Abstract:
Equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with pedagogical tutoring capabilities holds significant promise for education. Existing approaches simulate tutor behaviors or preferences and use them to prompt or fine-tune LLMs for dialogue tutoring. However, such methods often fail to sustain high-quality pedagogical conversations that provide explicit stepwise scaffolding and adapt to learners’ evolving cognitive states. To address this, we propose ScaffoldLM, a planning-guided tutoring framework with an assessment-driven memory for multi-turn math dialogue tutoring. ScaffoldLM first generates a stepwise pedagogical plan from solution steps, which serves as a stable backbone for explicit scaffolding. During tutoring, the tutoring memory is updated by an assessment-driven control loop that infers the learner’s cognitive state, evaluates whether the current step target is met, and adaptively selects tutoring actions. The plan, step-level progress, inferred learner states, and dialogue history are maintained in memory to support coherent multi-turn guidance. Experiments on multi-turn math tutoring benchmarks demonstrate that ScaffoldLM substantially improves pedagogical tutoring quality over strong baselines. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/BNU-ERC-ITEA/ScaffoldLM.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems augment large language models with external knowledge, yet introduce a critical security vulnerability: RAG Knowledge Base Leakage, wherein adversarial prompts can induce the model to divulge retrieved proprietary content. Recent studies reveal that such leakage can be executed through adaptive and iterative attack strategies (named RAG extraction attack), while effective countermeasures remain notably lacking. To bridge this gap, we propose CanaryRAG, a runtime defense mechanism inspired by stack canaries in software security. CanaryRAG embeds carefully designed canary tokens into retrieved chunks and reformulates RAG extraction defense as a dual-path runtime integrity game. Leakage is detected in real time whenever either the target or oracle path violates its expected canary behavior, including under adaptive suppression and obfuscation. Extensive evaluations against existing attacks demonstrate that CanaryRAG provides robust defense, achieving substantially lower chunk recovery rates than state-of-the-art baselines while imposing negligible impact on task performance and inference latency. Moreover, as a plug-and-play solution, CanaryRAG can be seamlessly integrated into arbitrary RAG pipelines without requiring retraining or structural modifications, offering a practical and scalable safeguard for proprietary data.

Abstract:
When asked a question in a language less seen in its training data, current reasoning large language models (RLMs) often exhibit dramatically lower performance than when asked the same question in English. In response, we introduce SP3F (Self-Play with Privileged Pairwise Feedback), a two-stage framework for enhancing multilingual reasoning without any data in the target language(s). First, we supervise fine-tune (SFT) on translated versions of English question-answer pairs to raise base model correctness. Second, we perform RL with feedback from a pairwise judge in a self-play fashion, with the judge receiving the English reference response as privileged information . Thus, even when none of the model’s responses are completely correct, the privileged pairwise judge can still tell which response is better. End-to-end, SP3F greatly improves base model performance, even outperforming fully post-trained models on multiple math and non-math tasks with less than 1/8 of the training data across the single-language, multilingual, and generalization to unseen language settings.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are primarily constrained by memory and bandwidth bottlenecks during deployment. Although Vector Quantization (VQ) has emerged as a promising solution, existing methods incur inference overhead due to massive codebook storage and intensive index lookups. Moreover, these methods typically suffer from non-negligible performance degradation under ultra-low bitwidth regimes. To bridge this gap, we propose Sparse-Compensated Vector Quantization (SCVQ), a novel framework designed for high-efficiency LLM vector quantization. SCVQ introduces a salience-aware weighted K-means clustering scheme with symmetry constraints to reduces codebook size and indexing costs. Central to our approach is a unified structured representation that consolidates outliers, salient weights, and quantization residuals into a single sparse compensation matrix. This design effectively preserves critical model information while leveraging VQ-specific properties to enable efficient custom kernels. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate SCVQ’s superior performance. Specifically, SCVQ achieves a perplexity of 5.78 on WikiText-2 for LLaMA-2-7B at 2-bit quantization, while delivering a 1.4× end-to-end inference speedup over existing baselines.

Abstract:
Current large language models (LLMs) and spoken language models (SLMs) begin thinking and taking actions only after the user has finished their turn. This prevents the model from interacting with the user during the user’s turn and can lead to high response latency when the model is thinking. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the “think while listening” behavior of humans. In this paper, we propose SHANKS, a general inference framework that enables SLMs to generate unspoken chain-of-thought reasoning while listening to user input. SHANKS streams input speech in fixed-duration chunks and, as soon as a chunk is received, generates unspoken reasoning based on all previous speech and reasoning, while the user continues speaking. SHANKS uses unspoken reasoning to determine whether to interrupt the user and make tool calls to complete the task. We demonstrate that SHANKS enhances real-time user–SLM interaction in two scenarios: (1) SHANKS can listen to the user’s speech and interrupt when the user makes a mistake. (2) In a tool-augmented dialogue scenario, SHANKS can complete 56.9% of the tool calls before the user ends their turn. Overall, SHANKS is a step toward models that keep thinking throughout the conversation, not only after a turn ends. Demos can be found on the project page: https://d223302.github.io/SHANKS/.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models have advanced rapidly, yet most remain English-centric, as scaling multilingual multimodal instruction tuning is limited by the scarcity and high cost of high-quality non-English image–text supervision. Although multilingual text data is abundant, naive textual fine-tuning can disrupt vision–language alignment and induce catastrophic forgetting. We propose Vision-Free Adaptation (VFA), a framework that decouples multilingual language enhancement from visual alignment by composing complementary task vectors over a shared LLM backbone. Specifically, we fine-tune a base LLM on multilingual text data to derive a multilingual task vector, which is then merged with the vision-aligned task vector of an MLLM. Experiments on five MLLMs across six multilingual multimodal benchmarks show consistent improvements while preserving both general multimodal and text-only capabilities. Moreover, VFA attains competitive performance with a fully multimodally trained model using less than 2% of the text data, demonstrating its efficiency and effectiveness.

Abstract:
For generative AI agents to partner effectively with human users, the ability to accurately predict human intent is critical. But this ability to collaborate remains limited by a critical deficit: an inability to model common ground. We present a referential communication experiment with a factorial design involving director-matcher pairs (human-human, human-AI, AI-human, and AI-AI) that interact with multiple turns in repeated rounds to match pictures of objects not associated with any obvious lexicalized labels. We show that LVLMs cannot interactively generate and resolve referring expressions in a way that enables smooth communication, a crucial skill that underlies human language use. We release our corpus of 356 dialogues (89 pairs over 4 rounds each) along with the online pipeline for data collection and the tools for analyzing accuracy, efficiency, and lexical overlap.

Abstract:
Evaluating expressive speech remains challenging, as existing methods mainly assess emotional intensity and overlook whether a speech sample is expressively appropriate for its contextual setting. This limitation hinders reliable evaluation of speech systems used in narrative-driven and interactive applications, such as audiobooks and conversational agents. We introduce CEAEval, a Context-rich framework for Evaluating Expressive Appropriateness in speech, which assesses whether a speech sample expressively aligns with the underlying communicative intent implied by its discourse-level narrative context. To support this task, we construct CEAEval-D, the first context-rich speech dataset with real human performances in Mandarin conversational speech, providing narrative descriptions together with fifteen dimensions of human annotations covering expressive attributes and expressive appropriateness. We further develop CEAEval-M, a model that integrates knowledge distillation, planner-based multi-model collaboration, adaptive audio attention bias, and reinforcement learning to perform context-rich expressive appropriateness evaluation. Experiments on a human-annotated test set demonstrate that CEAEval-M substantially outperforms existing speech evaluation and analysis systems.

Abstract:
Hausa texts are often characterized by writing anomalies such as incorrect character substitutions and spacing errors, which sometimes hinder natural language processing (NLP) applications. This paper presents an approach to automatically correct the anomalies by finetuning transformer-based models. Using a corpus gathered from several public sources, we create a large-scale parallel dataset of over 400,000 noisy-clean Hausa sentence pairs by introducing synthetically generated noise to mimic realistic writing errors. Moreover, we finetune several multilingual and African language models, including M2M100, AfriTeVA, NCAIR1/N-ATLaS, UBC-NLP/cheetah-base, and other variants of BART and T5 for this correction task. Our experimental results demonstrate that models such as M2M100 achieve state-of-the-art results despite their smaller size and distinct pretraining, and that correcting errors can have a significant impact in improving downstream tasks such as text classification, machine translation, question answering, and LLM prompting in general. This research provides a methodology, a publicly available dataset, and a comparison of models to improve Hausa text quality, thereby advancing NLP capabilities for the language and offering transferable insights for other low-resource languages.

Abstract:
Collaboration and information sharing empower Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) but also introduce a critical security risk known as Agent Cascading Injection (ACI). In such attacks, a compromised agent exploits inter-agent trust to propagate malicious instructions, causing cascading failures across the system. However, existing studies consider only limited attack strategies and simplified MAS settings, limiting their generalizability and comprehensive evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ACIArena, a unified framework for evaluating the robustness of MAS. ACIArena offers systematic evaluation suites spanning multiple attack surfaces (i.e., external inputs, agent profiles, inter-agent messages) and attack objectives (i.e., instruction hijacking, task disruption, information exfiltration). Specifically, ACIArena establishes a unified specification that jointly supports MAS construction and attack–defense modules. It covers six widely used MAS implementations and provides a benchmark of 1,356 test cases for systematically evaluating MAS robustness. Our benchmarking results show that evaluating MAS robustness solely through topology is insufficient; robust MAS require deliberate role design and controlled interaction patterns. Moreover, defenses developed in simplified environments often fail to transfer to real-world settings; narrowly scoped defenses may even introduce new vulnerabilities. ACIArena aims to provide a solid foundation for advancing deeper exploration of MAS design principles.

Abstract:
Autonomous LLM agents increasingly operate in long-horizon, interactive settings where success depends on reusing experience accumulated over extended histories. However, existing agent memory systems are fundamentally constrained by text-context budgets: storing or revisiting raw trajectories is prohibitively token-expensive, while summarization and text-only retrieval trade token savings for information loss and fragmented evidence. To address this limitation, we propose Optical Context Retrieval Memory (OCR-Memory), a memory framework that leverages the visual modality as a high-density representation of agent experience, enabling retention of arbitrarily long histories with minimal prompt overhead at retrieval time. Specifically, OCR-Memory renders historical trajectories into images annotated with unique visual identifiers. OCR-Memory retrieves stored experience via a locate-and-transcribe paradigm that selects relevant regions through visual anchors and retrieves the corresponding verbatim text, avoiding free-form generation and reducing hallucination. Experiments on long-horizon agent benchmarks show consistent gains under strict context limits, demonstrating that optical encoding increases effective memory capacity while preserving faithful evidence recovery.

Abstract:
Humans use introspection to evaluate their understanding through private internal states inaccessible to external observers. We investigate whether large language models possess similar privileged knowledge about answer correctness, information unavailable through external observation. We train correctness classifiers on question representations from both a model’s own hidden states and external models, testing whether self-representations provide a performance advantage. On standard evaluation, we find no advantage: self-probes perform comparably to peer-model probes. We hypothesize this is due to high inter-model agreement of answer correctness. To isolate genuine privileged knowledge, we evaluate on disagreement subsets, where models produce conflicting predictions. Here, we discover domain-specific privileged knowledge: self-representations consistently outperform peer representations in factual knowledge tasks, but show no advantage in math reasoning. We further localize this domain asymmetry across model layers, finding that the factual advantage emerges progressively from early-to-mid layers onward, consistent with model-specific memory retrieval, while math reasoning shows no consistent advantage at any depth.

Abstract:
Despite impressive progress in high-fidelity image synthesis, generative models still struggle with logic-intensive instruction following, exposing a persistent reasoning–execution gap. Meanwhile, closed-source systems (e.g., Nano Banana) have demonstrated strong reasoning-driven image generation, highlighting a substantial gap to current open-source models. We argue that closing this gap requires not merely better visual generators, but executable reasoning: decomposing high-level intents into grounded, verifiable plans that directly steer the generative process. To this end, we propose Unified Thinker , a task-agnostic reasoning architecture for general image generation, designed as a unified planning core that can plug into diverse generators and workflows. Unified Thinker decouples a dedicated Thinker from the image Generator, enabling modular upgrades of reasoning without retraining the entire generative model. We further introduce a two-stage training paradigm: we first build a structured planning interface for the Thinker, then apply reinforcement learning to ground its policy in pixel-level feedback, encouraging plans that optimize visual correctness over textual plausibility. Extensive experiments on text-to-image generation and image editing show that Unified Thinker substantially improves image reasoning and generation quality.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising technique to accelerate large language model inference by employing a smaller draft model to predict multiple tokens, which are then verified in parallel by the larger target model. However, existing approaches face a fundamental limitation: candidates at the same tree layer share identical feature representations, constraining diversity and diminishing overall effectiveness. We identify this as an intra-layer coupling problem that limits prediction accuracy. To address this challenge, we propose Jakiro, which introduces decoupled Mixture of Experts (MoE) into the draft model, enabling different experts to generate diverse candidate tokens from distinct feature spaces. We further propose Contrastive-Enhanced Parallel Decoding (CEPD) that combines autoregressive and parallel decoding with a contrastive mechanism to reduce inference steps while maintaining accuracy. Extensive experiments across diverse models and tasks demonstrate that Jakiro achieves significant speedups over strong baselines, with particularly notable improvements in non-greedy decoding scenarios where token diversity is crucial.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face safety misalignment where visual inputs enable harmful outputs. Existing methods require explicit safety labels or contrastive data, yet threat-related concepts are concrete and visually depictable, while safety concepts like helpfulness are abstract and lack visual referents. Inspired by self-fulfilling mechanism underlying emergent misalignment, we propose Visual Self-Fulfilling Alignment (VSFA). VSFA fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) on neutral VQA tasks constructed around threat-related images, without any safety labels. Through repeated exposure to threat-related visual content, models internalize implicit semantics of vigilance and caution, shaping safety-oriented personas. Experiments across multiple VLMs and safety benchmarks demonstrate that VSFA reduces attack success rate, improves response quality, and mitigates over-refusal while preserving general capabilities. Our work extends self-fulfilling mechanism from text to visual modalities, offering a label-free approach to VLMs alignment.

Abstract:
While Chain-of-Thought empowers Large Vision-Language Models with multi-step reasoning, explicit textual rationales suffer from an information bandwidth bottleneck, where continuous visual details are discarded during discrete tokenization. Recent latent reasoning methods attempt to address this challenge, but often fall prey to premature semantic collapse due to rigid autoregressive objectives. In this paper, we propose Laser, a novel paradigm that reformulates visual deduction via Dynamic Windowed Alignment Learning. Instead of forcing a point-wise prediction, Laser aligns the latent state with a dynamic validity window of future semantics. This mechanism enforces a "Forest-before-Trees" cognitive hierarchy, enabling the model to maintain a probabilistic superposition of global features before narrowing down to local details. Crucially, Laser maintains interpretability via decodable trajectories while stabilizing unconstrained learning via Self-Refined Superposition. Extensive experiments on 6 benchmarks demonstrate that Laser achieves state-of-the-art performance among latent reasoning methods, surpassing the strong baseline Monet by 5.03% on average. Notably, it achieves these gains with extreme efficiency, reducing inference tokens by more than 97%, while demonstrating robust generalization to out-of-distribution domains.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation is a widely adopted technique for transferring capabilities from LLMs to smaller, more efficient student models.However, unauthorized use of knowledge distillation takes unfair advantage of the considerable effort and cost put into developing frontier models.We investigate methods for modifying teacher-generated reasoning traces to achieve two objectives that deter unauthorized distillation: (1) anti-distillation , or degrading the training usefulness of query responses, and (2) API watermarking , which embeds verifiable signatures in student models.We introduce several approaches for dynamically rewriting a teacher’s reasoning outputs while preserving answer correctness and semantic coherence.Two of these leverage the rewriting capabilities of LLMs, while others use gradient-based techniques.Our experiments show that a simple instruction-based rewriting approach achieves a strong anti-distillation effect while maintaining or even improving teacher performance.Furthermore, we show that our rewriting approach also enables embedding watermarks that can be reliably detectedwith essentially no false alarms.Our code is available at https://github.com/xhOwenMa/trace-rewriting .

Abstract:
In knowledge-intensive creative tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate outputs that extend beyond established knowledge, making direct verification against current evidence impractical. Unlike factual hallucinations checked against ground truth, such outputs arise naturally in creative generation, where extending beyond current knowledge is often the goal. Yet prior work debates whether hallucination should be suppressed or embraced without empirically analyzing this unverifiable subclass. On the ideation evaluation side, existing work focuses on individual outputs without characterizing the unverifiable space as a whole. To address this gap, we propose a novelty-verifiability characterization that distinguishes Creative Synthesis (Region A) from Groundless Fabrication (Region B), and study it through a conceptual creation task where LLMs synthesize novel scientific concepts. Through 32,400 generations across three technical domains and 1,080 human judgments, we find that Region A is non-negligible (4.7%) and robust, persisting across generation strategies, models, domains, and embedding choices. A retrospective recovery experiment further shows that LLMs can approximate post-cutoff scientific concepts in controlled combinatorial settings. Our findings suggest that the unverifiable space is not uniformly noise but exhibits empirically distinguishable internal structure, providing an empirical basis for more selective hallucination governance.[]

Abstract:
Idiomatic Expression Generation, which aims to produce idiomatic text from plain text, is a valuable yet challenging NLP task. However, existing methods suffer from the scarcity of parallel data and dependence on high-quality manual annotations. To address this, we propose an iterative LLM-SLM (Large Language Model-Small Language Model) collaborative framework — Auto-IDEA, that replaces human supervision for idiomatic expression data generation. In this self-improving cycle, the LLM constructs parallel corpora (idiomatic and plain text) via bidirectional semantic reconstruction, automatically generating "Locate-Then-Polish" (LTP) annotations; the SLM filters low-quality corpora while continuously enhancing its verification ability through incremental learning. We instantiate Auto-IDEA for Chinese Idiom Polishing (CIP), constructing CIP-200K, a large-scale dataset of 206K parallel sentences with LTP annotations. The Qwen3-8B fine-tuned on CIP-200K achieves a 25.2% absolute Idiom Polishing Accuracy (IPA) improvement over a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) baseline, outperforming DeepSeek-R1 by 6.2%. Extensive experiments (e.g., Chinese idiom cloze tests and English idiom generation tasks) and human evaluations verify the generalization and effectiveness of Auto-IDEA, demonstrating a new pathway for high-quality, annotation-free data generation through LLM-SLM collaboration.

Abstract:
Despite the recent success of instruction-tuned language models and their ubiquitous usage, very little is known of how models process instructions internally. In this work, we address this gap from a mechanistic point of view by investigating how instruction-specific representations are constructed and utilized in different stages of post-training: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). Via causal mediation, we identify that instruction representation is fairly localized in models. These representations, which we call Instruction Vectors (IVs), demonstrate a curious juxtaposition of linear separability along with non-linear causal interaction, broadly questioning the scope of the linear representation hypothesis commonplace in mechanistic interpretability. To disentangle the non-linear causal interaction, we propose a novel method to localize information processing in language models that is free from the implicit linear assumptions of patching-based techniques. We find that, conditioned on the task representations formed in the early layers, different information pathways are selected in the later layers to solve that task, i.e., IVs act as circuit selectors.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on many reasoning benchmarks, yet these evaluations typically focus on isolated tasks that differ from real-world usage in task-oriented dialogue (TOD). In this setting, LLMs must perform reasoning inherently while generating text and adhering to instructions on role, format, and style. This mismatch raises concerns about whether benchmark performance accurately reflects models’ reasoning robustness in TOD setting.We investigate how framing reasoning tasks within TOD affects LLM performance by introducing a new dynamic benchmark covering eight travel-related tasks that require arithmetic, spatial, temporal, and commonsense reasoning. Each problem is presented in both isolated and dialogue-based variants, enabling controlled comparison while mitigating data contamination. Experiments on nine LLMs reveal a substantial and consistent performance gap between isolated and dialogue settings. Through ablations and qualitative analysis, we show that this gap is largely driven by the multi-turn nature of dialogue, with additional effects from role conditioning and tool-use requirements. Our results highlight the need to evaluate LLM reasoning in realistic interactive scenarios.

Abstract:
Unified Information Extraction (UIE) aims to handle heterogeneous IE tasks within a single framework, but existing methods often suffer from inconsistent schema representation, implicitly intermediate reasoning and full-parameter adaptation, which limit generalization, interpretability and parameter efficiency. To address these issues, we propose UC-UIE (Universal Capabilities-based Unified Information Extractor), a unified framework based on Large Language Model (LLM), which introduces a unified frame-and-slots schema for IE tasks and explicitly decomposes IE reasoning into three universal capabilities: judging, locating, and associating. Furthermore, UC-UIE adopts a Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) based hierarchical Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) adapter to fine-tune LLMs for IE tasks, which explicitly models these three capabilities in a task-driven way while ensuring parameter efficiency. With only 1.24% trainable parameters, UC-UIE outperforms full-parameter tuning methods, showing excellent parameter efficiency. Zero-shot evaluation reveals its strong generalization ability to unseen domains and schemas, benefiting from unified schema representation and explicit capability decomposition. Further experiments validate that the hierarchical MoE adapter learns capability specialization and composition, which enhances both UIE performance and interpretability.

Abstract:
Standard evaluators, such as reward models, compress diverse human judgments into a single scalar, conflating valid Subjective Preference with Cognitive Uncertainty. This structural mismatch often leads to brittle alignment and reward hacking. To address this, we propose PRISM which reinterprets reward evaluation as a conditional distribution parameterized by a Mixture of Gaussians. PRISM structurally disentangles these factors: distinct Gaussian experts emerge to capture conflicting preference dimensions, while their variance estimates quantify uncertainty, acting as a dynamic reliability gate during optimization. We introduce a two-stage training strategy to learn these disentangled representations from scalable pairwise comparisons without requiring massive fine-grained annotations. Empirical results show that PRISM significantly outperforms scalar baselines in both accuracy and generalization. Furthermore, in downstream Reinforcement Learning, PRISM effectively mitigates reward hacking, yielding policies that are more robust and resilient to distribution shifts.

Abstract:
Role-playing (RP) agents rely on behavioral profiles to act consistently across diverse narrative contexts, yet existing profiles are largely unstructured, non-executable, and weakly validated, leading to brittle agent behavior. We propose Codified Decision Trees (CDT) , a data-driven framework that induces an executable and interpretable decision structure from large-scale narrative data. CDT represents behavioral profiles as a tree of conditional rules, where internal nodes correspond to validated scene conditions and leaves encode grounded behavioral statements, enabling deterministic retrieval of context-appropriate rules at execution time. The tree is learned by iteratively inducing candidate scene–action rules, validating them against data, and refining them through hierarchical specialization, yielding profiles that support transparent inspection and principled updates. Across multiple benchmarks, CDT substantially outperforms human-written profiles and prior profile induction methods, indicating that codified and validated behavioral representations lead to more reliable agent grounding.

Abstract:
Large-scale social simulators are essential for studying complex social patterns. Prior work explores hybrid methods to scale up simulations, combining large language models (LLM)-based agents with numerical agent-based models (ABM). However, this incurs high latency due to expensive memory retrieval and sequential ABM execution. To address this challenge, we propose GASim, a graph-accelerated hybrid multi-agent framework for large-scale social simulations. For core agents driven by LLM, GASim introduces Graph-Optimized Memory (GOM) to replace intensive LLM-based retrieval pipelines with lightweight propagation over a sparse memory graph. For the majority of ordinary agents, GASim employs Graph Message Passing (GMP), substituting sequential ABM execution with parallel updates by fine-grained feature aggregation and Graph Attention Network. We further introduce Entropy-Driven Grouping (EDG) that coordinates this hybrid partitioning, leveraging information entropy to dynamically identify emergent core agents situated in information-diverse neighborhoods. Extensive experiments show that GASim not only delivers a substantial 9.94× end-to-end speedup over the traditional hybrid framework but also consumes less than 20% of baseline tokens, significantly reducing costs while preserving strong alignment with real-world public opinion trends.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed to autonomously solve complex tasks, raising urgent needs for IP protection and regulatory provenance. While content watermarking effectively attributes LLM-generated outputs, it fails to directly identify the high-level planning behaviors (e.g., tool and subgoal choices) that govern multi-step execution. Critically, watermarking at the planning-behavior layer faces unique challenges: minor distributional deviations in decision-making can compound during long-term agent operation, degrading utility, and many agents operate as black boxes that are difficult to intervene in directly. To bridge this gap, we propose AgentMark, a behavioral watermarking framework that embeds multi-bit identifiers into planning decisions while preserving utility. It operates by eliciting an explicit behavior distribution from the agent and applying distribution-preserving conditional sampling, enabling deployment under black-box APIs while remaining compatible with action-layer content watermarking. Experiments across embodied, tool-use, and social environments demonstrate practical multi-bit capacity, robust recovery from partial logs, and utility preservation. Code is available at https://github.com/Tooooa/AgentMark.

Abstract:
The supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage is crucial for multimodal large language models (MLLMs), yet a comprehensive scaling law to guide the optimal model-data configuration remains lacking. In this paper, we make an initial attempt to address this gap. First, we theoretically demonstrate that directly computing the optimal computation frontier for MLLM-SFT, as we can for traditional LLMs, is a challenging task. This complexity arises because MLLM-SFT is influenced by a broader range of factors, including model size, LLM pre-training tokens, and MLLM SFT tokens. To tackle this issue, we propose two scaling laws based on LLM paradigms: one applicable when training data volumes are well defined by researchers, and another for cases where models are sourced from open communities with unknown training data. Through theoretical modeling and approximations, we provide researchers with valuable recommendations for optimal resource allocation. Furthermore, we establish a strong correlation ( R 2 = 0.98 ) between training loss and downstream performance, enabling accurate performance estimation without the need for exhaustive benchmarking. To validate our scaling laws, we construct a testbed of 60 models ranging from 50 million to 8 billion parameters, totaling 1,560 checkpoints. Each checkpoint is evaluated on than 10 MLLM benchmarks, ensuring robust fitting of our formulations.

Abstract:
With the growing potential of large language models (LLMs) in the legal domain, domain-specific finetuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods have received widespread attention. However, current methods still suffer from hallucination risk and failing to resolve semantic drift and adapt to varying citation numbers. To address this, we propose Authoritative and Accurate Lawyer (AALawyer), a complementary dual-retriever framework based on the Legal Syllogism and the nature of different legal data. First, we introduce Symbolic Constrained Retrieval (SCR) for closed-set article retrieval, by constraining retrieval to the generative prediction. Second, we build Analogical Precedent Retrieval (APR) to retrieve open-set judicial precedents for reasoning with a newly collected large criminal dataset.Extensive experiments, including LawBench, our Hallucination Risk-Benchmark, and comprehensive ablation studies, demonstrate the effectiveness of AALawyer, which mitigates hallucinations while improving the explainability of legal reasoning.

Abstract:
The widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs) makes detecting LLM-Generated text a critical security task. Existing methods, primarily relying on output probabilities from proxy models or single semantic features, suffer from distribution misalignment and limited interpretability. We observe that machine-generated text exhibits a directionally consistent systematic translation relative to human-written text within the joint semantic-structural space. Accordingly, we propose ProSSD, a statistical framework utilizing supervised subspace learning to extract compact features and construct conditional semantic distributions based on syntactic structures. By employing a likelihood ratio test, we derive a modified Mahalanobis distance, weighted by the Wasserstein distance, as the discriminative metric. Experiments demonstrate ProSSD’s superior robustness and computational efficiency across cross-domain, cross-model, and adversarial scenarios. Furthermore, we reveal the phenomena of systematic semantic translation and semantic collapse in machine-generated text, offering interpretable statistical insights into LLM generation behaviors.

Abstract:
Fine-tuned language models pose significant privacy risks, as they may memorize and expose sensitive information from their training data. Membership inference attacks (MIAs) provide a principled framework for auditing these risks, yet existing methods achieve limited detection rates, particularly at the low false-positive thresholds required for practical privacy auditing. We present EZ-MIA, a membership inference attack that exploits a key observation: memorization manifests most strongly at error positions, specifically tokens where the model predicts incorrectly yet still shows elevated probability for training examples. We introduce the Error Zone (EZ) score, which measures the directional imbalance of probability shifts at error positions relative to a pretrained reference model. This principled statistic requires only two forward passes per query and no model training of any kind. On WikiText with GPT-2, EZ-MIA achieves 3.8 × higher detection than the previous state-of-the-art under identical conditions (66.3% versus 17.5% true positive rate at 1% false positive rate), with near-perfect discrimination (AUC 0.98). At the stringent 0.1% FPR threshold critical for real-world auditing, we achieve 8 × higher detection than prior work (14.0% versus 1.8%), requiring no reference model training. These gains extend to larger architectures: on AG News with Llama-2-7B, we achieve 3 × higher detection (46.7% versus 15.8% TPR at 1% FPR). These results establish that privacy risks of fine-tuned language models are substantially greater than previously understood, with implications for both privacy auditing and deployment decisions. Code is available at https://github.com/JetBrains-Research/ez-mia.

Abstract:
Multi-agent debate (MAD) aims to improve large language model (LLM) reasoning by letting multiple agents exchange answers and then aggregate their opinions. Yet recent studies reveal that agents are not neutral: they are prone to identity-driven sycophancy and self-bias, uncritically adopting a peer’s view or stubbornly adhering to their own prior output, undermining the reliability of debate. In this work, we present the first principled framework that joins sycophancy and self-bias to mitigate and quantify identity bias in MAD. First, we formalize the debate dynamics as an identity-weighted Bayesian update process. Second, we propose response anonymization: by removing identity markers from prompts, agents cannot distinguish "self" from "peer", which forces equal weights on agent identity, thereby reducing bias and improving trustworthiness. Third, we define the Identity Bias Coefficient (IBC), a principled bias metric that measures an agent’s tendency to follow its peer versus itself. Empirical studies across multiple models and benchmarks confirm that identity bias is widespread, with sycophancy far more common than self-bias. Our findings highlight the need to ensure that MAD systems reason based on content rather than identity.

Abstract:
Multi-bit watermarking has emerged as a promising solution for embedding imperceptible binary messages into Large Language Model (LLM)-generated text, enabling reliable attribution and tracing of malicious usage of LLMs. Despite recent progress, existing methods still face key limitations: some become computationally infeasible for large messages, while others suffer from a poor trade-off between text quality and decoding accuracy. Moreover, the decoding accuracy of existing methods drops significantly when the number of tokens in the generated text is limited, a condition that frequently arises in practical usage. To address these challenges, we propose XMark, a novel method for encoding and decoding binary messages in LLM-generated texts. The unique design of XMark’s encoder produces a less distorted logit distribution for watermarked token generation, preserving text quality, and also enables its tailored decoder to reliably recover the encoded message with limited tokens. Extensive experiments across diverse downstream tasks show that XMark significantly improves decoding accuracy while preserving the quality of watermarked text, outperforming prior methods. The code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Abstract:
We study asymmetric vulnerability to embedding corruption in encoder-based language models, where uniform perturbations dis-proportionately degrade low-magnitude embeddings compared to high-magnitude ones. Since critical words concentrate in low-norm space, this asymmetry causes catastrophic degradation of grammatical and semantic structure even under moderate corruption. Existing robustness approaches either sacrifice clean performance or fail to generalize to higher corruption levels. To address this problem, we propose Robertha, an attention mechanism built on Modern Hopfield Networks, in which semantic patterns act as stable states (attractors) that pull corrupted embeddings toward correct representations. We introduce iterative refinement for differential recovery: heavily corrupted embeddings require multiple convergence steps, while lightly corrupted embeddings converge quickly. To strengthen this mechanism, we introduce Eigenspectrum Regularization (ESR), which enforces low-rank key structures by controlling eigenvalue entropy, creating strong, well separated attractors with wide recovery basins. Across 13 GLUE and SuperGLUE tasks, Robertha significantly outperforms existing robustness methods while maintaining competitive clean performance.

Abstract:
The reliability of VLM-as-a-Judge is critical for the automatic evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs). Despite recent progress, our analysis reveals that VLM-as-a-Judge often pays limited attention to the image when making decisions. Instead, they often blindly favor the more informative answer, even when they can recognize it conflicts with the image content. We call this problem informativeness bias, which significantly undermines judge reliability. To address it, we propose BIRCH (Balanced Informativeness and CoRrectness with a Truthful AnCHor), a judging paradigm that first corrects inconsistencies with the image content in candidate answers, and then compares the answers against this corrected version. This shifts the judge’s focus from informativeness to image-grounded correctness. Experiments on multiple models and benchmarks show that BIRCH reduces informativeness bias by up to 17%, resulting in performance gains of up to 9.8%. Our work reveals an overlooked but fundamental flaw in current VLM-as-a-Judge systems and highlights the need for more principled designs.

Abstract:
Multi-agent debate has been shown to improve reasoning in large language models (LLMs). However, it is compute-intensive, requiring generation of long transcripts before answering questions. To address this inefficiency, we develop a framework that distills multi-agent debate into a single LLM through a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline combining debate structure learning with internalization via dynamic reward scheduling and length clipping. Across multiple models and benchmarks, our internalized models match or exceed explicit multi-agent debate performance using up to 93% fewer tokens. We then investigate the mechanistic basis of this capability through activation steering, finding that internalization creates agent-specific subspaces: interpretable directions in activation space corresponding to different agent perspectives. We further demonstrate a practical application: by instilling malicious agents into the LLM through internalized debate, then applying negative steering to suppress them, we show that distillation makes harmful behaviors easier to localize and control with smaller reductions in general performance compared to steering base models. Our findings offer a new perspective for understanding multi-agent capabilities in distilled models and provide practical guidelines for controlling internalized reasoning behaviors.

Abstract:
Currently, most reinforcement learning tasks focus on domains like mathematics and programming, where verification is relatively straightforward. However, in subjective tasks such as role-playing, alignment techniques struggle to make progress, primarily because subjective reward modeling using the Bradley-Terry model faces significant challenges when dealing with ambiguous preferences. To improve reward modeling in subjective tasks, this paper proposes AAM (Act-Adaptive Margin), which enhances reward modeling by dynamically calibrating preference margins using the model’s internal parameter knowledge. We design two versions of AAM that efficiently generate contextually-appropriate preference gaps without additional human annotation. This approach fundamentally improves how reward models handle subjective rewards by better integrating generative understanding with preference scoring. To validate AAM’s effectiveness in subjective reward modeling, we conduct evaluations on RewardBench, JudgeBench, and challenging role-playing tasks. Results show that AAM significantly improves subjective reward modeling performance, enhancing Bradley-Terry reward models by 2.95% in general tasks and 4.85% in subjective role-playing tasks. Furthermore, reward models trained with AAM can help downstream alignment tasks achieve better results. Our test results show that applying rewards generated by AAM-Augmented RM to preference learning techniques (e.g., GRPO) achieves state-of-the-art results on CharacterEval and Charm. The code and dataset will be released upon acceptance.

Abstract:
While bias in large language models (LLMs) is well-studied, similar concerns in vision-language models (VLMs) have received comparatively less attention. Existing VLM bias studies often focus on portrait-style images and gender-occupation associations, overlooking broader and more complex social stereotypes and their implied harm. This work introduces Vignette, a large-scale VQA benchmark with 30M+ images for evaluating bias in VLMs through a question-answering framework spanning four directions: factuality, perception, stereotyping, and decision making. Beyond narrowly-centered studies, we assess how VLMs interpret identities in contextualized settings, revealing how models make trait and capability assumptions and exhibit patterns of discrimination. Drawing from social psychology, we examine how VLMs connect visual identity cues to trait and role-based inferences, encoding social hierarchies, through biased selections. Our findings uncover subtle, multifaceted, and surprising stereotypical patterns, offering insights into how VLMs construct social meaning from inputs.

Abstract:
The increasing use of large language models in mental health applications calls for principled evaluation frameworks that assess alignment with psychotherapeutic best practices beyond surface-level fluency. While recent systems exhibit conversational competence, they lack structured mechanisms to evaluate adherence to core therapeutic principles. In this paper, we study the problem of evaluating AI-generated therapist-like responses for clinically grounded appropriateness and effectiveness. We assess each therapists utterance along six therapeutic principles: non-judgmental acceptance, warmth, respect for autonomy, active listening, reflective understanding, and situational appropriateness using a fine-grained ordinal scale. We introduce FAITH-M, a benchmark annotated with expert-assigned ordinal ratings, and propose CARE, a multi-stage evaluation framework that integrates intra-dialogue context, contrastive exemplar retrieval, and knowledge-distilled chain-of-thought reasoning. Experiments show that CARE achieves an F-1 score of 63.34 versus the strong baseline Qwen3 F-1 score of 38.56 which is a 64.26% improvement, which also serves as its backbone, indicating that gains arise from structured reasoning and contextual modeling rather than backbone capacity alone. Expert assessment and external dataset evaluations further demonstrate robustness under domain shift, while highlighting challenges in modeling implicit clinical nuance. Overall, CARE provides a clinically grounded framework for evaluating therapeutic fidelity in AI mental health systems.

Abstract:
We present a neuromuscular speech interface that translates electromyographic (EMG) signals recorded from orofacial muscles during speech articulation directly into audio. We find that self-supervised speech (S3) representations are strongly linearly related to the electrical power of muscle activity: a simple linear mapping predicts EMG power from S3 representations with a correlation of r = 0.85. In addition, EMG power vectors associated with distinct articulatory gestures form structured, separable clusters. Together, these observations suggest that S3 models implicitly encode articulatory mechanisms, as reflected in EMG activity. Leveraging this structure, we map EMG signals into the S3 representation space and synthesize speech, enabling end-to-end EMG-to-speech generation without explicit articulatory modeling or vocoder training. We demonstrate this system with a participant with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), converting orofacial EMG recorded while she silently articulated speech into audio.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from "Reasoning Collapse" on challenging mathematical reasoning tasks, where stochastic sampling produces lexical variations of the same erroneous logic rather than genuine semantic exploration. We observe that failed reasoning traces are often associated with a low-rank bias manifold in the model’s hidden-state geometry, which reduces exploration toward corrective solution directions. To address this, we propose Spectral Orthogonal Exploration (SOE), a geometric inference framework under a "Student Guides Teacher" paradigm. Instead of using a weak auxiliary agent for imitation, SOE uses it as an orthogonal probe to introduce semantically heterogeneous reasoning signals into the teacher’s orthogonal complement of its dominant subspace. This intervention steers the teacher toward more diverse reasoning trajectories and improves exploration beyond standard sampling. Experiments on mathematical benchmarks show that SOE improves average accuracy by 62.4% and average sampling efficiency by 113.7% over baseline methods, suggesting that geometric interventions can be effective for mitigating reasoning collapse in mathematical reasoning. We further provide preliminary evidence that SOE is also effective on logic and code generation benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/dayuwang401/spectral-orthogonal-exploration.

Abstract:
Large language model agents rely on in-context policy documents encoding diverse business rules. As businesses scale, these documents grow, creating substantial computational overhead and motivating internalization methods that embed policy into model priors. Prior work focuses on generic prompts, but we find agentic policies span multiple complexity levels and demand heavier reasoning, posing greater challenges. We introduce an agentic benchmark generator with Controllable Complexity in agent policy across four levels, enabling systematic evaluation of agents under increasing complexity and providing a testbed for policy internalization. Our analysis shows that workflow-governing policy specifications are the hardest to reason over, and that SFT on gold trajectories with chain-of-thought is data-hungry and struggles at high complexity. We propose Category-Aware Policy Continued Pretraining, an automated pipeline that analyzes policies, extracts key specifications, categorizes them into factual, behavioral, and conditional types, and isolates those driving workflow complexity. This enables targeted “therapy” by synthesizing specialized training data for each type and improving internalization via an autoregressive pretraining loss. Extensive experiments show our synthetic data and objective consistently improve performance. Combined with SFT, our method outperforms the baseline across different settings, especially in data-sparse and high-complexity regimes, with gains up to 41% and 22% on Qwen-3-32B. Overall, we achieve 97.3% prompt reduction on our benchmark, and on 𝜏 -Bench we further improve performance while reducing prompt requirements with very limited SFT data.

Abstract:
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves large language model performance on complex tasks, but often produces excessively long and inefficient reasoning traces. Existing methods shorten CoTs using length penalties or global entropy reduction, implicitly assuming that low uncertainty is desirable throughout reasoning. We show instead that reasoning efficiency is governed by the trajectory of uncertainty. CoTs with dominant downward entropy trends are substantially shorter. Motivated by this insight, we propose Entropy Trend Reward (ETR), a trajectory-aware objective that encourages progressive uncertainty reduction while allowing limited local exploration. We integrate ETR into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and evaluate it across multiple reasoning models and challenging benchmarks. ETR consistently achieves a superior accuracy–efficiency trade-off, improving DeepSeek-R1-Distill-7B by +9.9% accuracy while reducing CoT length by 67% across four benchmarks.

Abstract:
Recent text embedding models are often adapted to specialized domains via contrastive pre-finetuning (PFT) on a naive collection of scattered, heterogeneous tasks. However, this approach often introduces task-induced bias alongside domain knowledge, leading to uncontrolled representation shifts that distort the pretrained embedding geometry and cause substantial performance degradation.To address this issue, we propose REZE, a representation regularization framework that explicitly controls representation shift during embedding pre-finetuning. REZE operates on the relations of anchor-positive pairs and decomposes them in an eigenspace. It then measures task-wise dispersion along each eigencomponent to identify task-variant directions and applies adaptive soft-shrinkage to suppress task-induced noise while preserving task-invariant semantic structure, without inference-time overhead. Experiments across multiple embedding backbones and specialized benchmarks show that REZE outperforms standard pre-finetuning and isotropy-oriented post-hoc regularization in most settings, remaining stable where existing PFT variants collapse. Embedding space analyses further confirm that REZE induces controlled shifts aligned with the original embedding manifold, underscoring representation shift control as a key principle for robust embedding pre-finetuning under heterogeneous supervision.

Abstract:
Recent advances in spoken language processing have led to substantial progress in phonetic tasks such as automatic speech recognition (ASR), phone recognition (PR), grapheme-to-phoneme conversion (G2P), and phoneme-to-grapheme conversion (P2G). Despite their conceptual similarity, these tasks have largely been studied in isolation, each relying on task-specific architectures and datasets. In this paper, we introduce POWSM (Phonetic Open Whisper-style Speech Model), the first unified framework capable of jointly performing multiple phone-related tasks. POWSM enables seamless conversion between audio, text (graphemes), and phones, opening up new possibilities for universal and low-resource speech processing. Our model outperforms or matches specialized PR models of similar size (Wav2Vec2Phoneme and ZIPA) while jointly supporting G2P, P2G, and ASR. Our training data, models, and code are released to foster open science.

Abstract:
There are growing concerns about the risks posed by AI companion applications designed for emotional engagement. Existing safety evaluations often rely on self-reported user data or interviews, offering limited insights into real-time dynamics. We present the first end-to-end scalable framework for controlled simulation and safety evaluation of multi-turn interactions with AI companion applications. Our framework integrates four key components: persona construction with clinical and psychometric validation, persona-specific scenario generation, scenario-driven multi-turn simulation with a dialogue refinement module that preserves persona fidelity, and harm evaluation. We apply this framework to evaluate how Replika, a widely used AI companion app, responds to high-risk user groups. We construct 9 personas representing individuals with depression, anxiety, PTSD, eating disorders, and incel identity, and collect 1,674 dialogue pairs across 25 high-risk scenarios. We combine emotion modeling and LLM–assisted utterance-and harm-level classification to analyze these exchanges. Results show that Replika exhibits a narrow emotional range dominated by curiosity and care, while frequently mirroring or normalizing unsafe content such as self-harm, disordered eating, and violent-fantasy narratives. These findings highlight how controlled persona simulations can serve as a scalable testbed for evaluating safety risks in AI companions.

Abstract:
Symbolic logical reasoning is a critical yet underexplored capability of large language models (LLMs), providing reliable and verifiable decision-making in high-stakes domains such as mathematical reasoning and legal judgment. In this study, we present a systematic analysis of logical reasoning under controlled increases in logical complexity, and reveal a previously unrecognized phenomenon, which we term Logical Phase Transitions: rather than degrading smoothly, logical reasoning performance remains stable within a regime but collapses abruptly beyond a critical logical depth, mirroring physical phase transitions such as water freezing beyond a critical temperature threshold. Building on this insight, we propose Neuro-Symbolic Curriculum Tuning, a principled framework that adaptively aligns natural language with logical symbols to establish a shared representation, and reshapes training dynamics around phase-transition boundaries to progressively strengthen reasoning at increasing logical depths. Experiments on five benchmarks show that our approach effectively mitigates logical reasoning collapse at high complexity, yielding average accuracy gains of +1.26 in naive prompting and +3.95 in CoT, while improving generalization to unseen logical compositions.

Abstract:
Multi-speaker automatic speech recognition (MASR) aims to predict ”who spoke when and what” from multi-speaker speech, a key technology for multi-party dialogue understanding. However, most existing approaches decouple temporal modeling and speaker modeling when addressing ”when” and ”who”: some inject speaker cues before encoding (e.g., speaker masking), which can cause irreversible information loss; others fuse identity by mixing speaker posteriors after encoding, which may entangle acoustic content with speaker identity. This separation is brittle under rapid turn-taking and overlapping speech, often leading to degraded performance. To address these limitations, we propose TellWhisper , a unified framework that jointly models speaker identity and temporal within the speech encoder. Specifically, we design TS - RoPE , a time-speaker rotary positional encoding: time coordinates are derived from frame indices, while speaker coordinates are derived from speaker activity and pause cues. By applying region-specific rotation angles, the model explicitly captures per-speaker continuity, speaker-turn transitions, and state dynamics, enabling the attention mechanism to simultaneously attend to ”when” and ”who”. Moreover, to estimate frame-level speaker activity, we develop Hyper - SD , which casts speaker classification in hyperbolic space to enhance inter-class separation and refine speaker-activity estimates. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The project webpage is available at https://walker-hyf.github.io/TellWhisper.

Abstract:
Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to remove targeted knowledge while preserving general capability. In this paper, we recast LLM unlearning as an asymmetric two-task problem: retention is the primary objective and forgetting is an auxiliary. From this perspective, we propose a retention-prioritized gradient synthesis framework that decouples task-specific gradient extraction from conflict-aware combination. Instantiating the framework, we adapt established PCGrad to resolve gradient conflicts, and introduce SAGO, a novel retention-prioritized gradient synthesis method. Theoretically, both variants ensure non-negative cosine similarity with the retain gradient, while SAGO achieves strictly tighter alignment through constructive sign-constrained synthesis. Empirically, on WMDP Bio/Cyber and RWKU benchmarks, SAGO consistently pushes the Pareto frontier: e.g., on WMDP Bio (SimNPO+GD), recovery of target model MMLU performance progresses from 44.6% (naive) to 94.0% (+PCGrad) and further to 96.0% (+SAGO), while maintaining comparable forgetting strength. Our results show that re-shaping gradient geometry, rather than re-balancing losses, is the key to mitigating unlearning-retention trade-offs.

Abstract:
LLMs have static pre-trained knowledge, leading to obsolescence and hallucinations. Knowledge Editing (KE) addresses these issues and typically requires multi-layer modifications. However, existing state-of-the-art methods, largely following the Locate–Select–Assign–Edit (LSAE) paradigm, rely on fixed-layer selection and uniform residual assignment, ignoring the heterogeneous causal efficacy of different layers. To bridge this, we propose CAKE ( C ausal-Guided A daptive K nowledge E diting), a collaborative editing method within the more general Locate–Weight–Assign–Edit (LWAE) paradigm that: (1) selectively identifies critical layers via causal tracing scores; and (2) adaptively allocates editing burdens based on causal weights rather than uniform assumptions. We formulate residual assignment as a constrained quadratic optimization problem and derive a solution for optimal residual allocation, showing that aligning edits with causal efficacy mitigates recursive error accumulation. Furthermore, we establish a generalized weight shift error bound, under which existing paradigms emerge as special, restricted cases. Experimental results demonstrate that CAKE achieves SOTA performance with comparable overhead, validating the superiority of causal-guided adaptation.

Abstract:
Although debiased large language models (LLMs) excel at handling known or low-bias prompts, they often fail on unfamiliar and high-bias prompts. We demonstrate via out-of-distribution (OOD) detection that these high-bias prompts cause a distribution shift, degrading static model performance. To enable real-time correction, we propose CAP-TTA, a test-time adaptation framework. CAP-TTA triggers context-aware LoRA updates only when a bias-risk score exceeds a set threshold. By utilizing an offline precomputed diagonal preconditioner, it ensures fast and stable optimization. Across multiple benchmarks and human evaluations, CAP-TTA effectively reduces toxicity/bias score with significantly lower latency than standard optimization methods (e.g., AdamW or SGD). Furthermore, it prevents catastrophic forgetting, and substantially improves narrative fluency over state-of-the-art baselines without compromising debiasing performance.

Abstract:
Existing QA benchmarks typically assume distinct documents with minimal overlap, yet real-world retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems operate on corpora such as financial reports, legal codes, and patents, where information is highly redundant and documents exhibit strong inter-document similarity. This mismatch undermines evaluation validity: retrievers can be unfairly undervalued even when they retrieve documents that provide sufficient evidence, because redundancy across documents is not accounted for in evaluation. On the other hand, retrievers that perform well on standard benchmarks often generalize poorly to real-world corpora with highly similar and redundant documents. We present RARE (Redundancy-Aware Retrieval Evaluation), a framework for constructing realistic benchmarks by (i) decomposing documents into atomic facts to enable precise redundancy tracking and (ii) enhancing LLM-based data generation with CRRF. RAG benchmark data usually requires multiple quality criteria, but LLMs often yield trivial outputs. CRRF scores criteria separately and fuses decisions by rank, improving the reliability of generated data. Applying RARE to Finance, Legal, and Patent corpora, we introduce RedQA, where a strong retriever baseline drops from 66.4% PerfRecall@10 on 4-hop General-Wiki to 5.0–27.9% PerfRecall@10 at 4-hop depth, revealing robustness gaps that current benchmarks fail to capture. RARE enables practitioners to build domain-specific RAG evaluations that faithfully reflect real-world deployment conditions.

Abstract:
Logical reasoning with large language models (LLMs) has made significant progress in recent years. However, existing methods still suffer from insufficient rule semantic grounding and weak rule application mechanisms, making it difficult to achieve precise understanding and effective utilization of rules in complex multi-step reasoning. To address this, we propose Leibniz, a theory-of-mind driven neuro-symbolic reasoning framework. Specifically, we construct a bidirectional reasoning model based on multi-agent collaboration, which characterizes the reasoning process from two complementary perspectives, namely the Evolution Agent and the Reduction Agent. The former transforms belief-unstable propositions into stable ones that are beneficial for proving the target conclusion. The latter performs reverse reduction from the target to resolve belief conflicts and distill new inferential insights. Both share a belief state space and achieve efficient collaborative reasoning through continual belief updating. We integrate natural language and symbolic representations throughout the reasoning process. The experimental results demonstrate that Leibniz surpasses existing state-of-the-art models in reasoning accuracy, and further analyses reveal its substantial advantages in reliability and flexibility.

Abstract:
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are advancing rapidly, accurately evaluating their capabilities remains challenging. Current paradigms primarily rely on holistic scoring and static leaderboards, which fail to disentangle fine-grained competencies. Specifically, they suffer from “Outcome Bias” by validating only final answers and ignoring intermediate reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce ATOM (AnaTomy Of MLLM), a novel MLLM-as-a-judge framework designed to shift the focus from ranking to fine-grained diagnosis. ATOM decomposes complex reasoning into atomic criteria anchored in visual elements, enforcing verification against explicit visual facts. Validated on a newly constructed benchmark with rigorous human rankings, ATOM achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, surpassing the strongest baseline by up to 7.92%. Moving beyond ranking, ATOM bridges the gap between assessment and alignment: by pinpointing atomic-level failures, it establishes a closed-loop mechanism for targeted self-correction. This approach enables models to identify and rectify errors autonomously, successfully resolving up to 39.95% of previously failed queries without human intervention.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a cornerstone for knowledge-intensive tasks. However, the efficacy of RAG is often bottlenecked by the “one-size-fits-all” retrieval paradigm, as different queries exhibit distinct preferences for different retrievers. While recent routing techniques attempt to select the optimal retriever dynamically, they typically operate under a ‘single and static capability’ assumption, selecting retrievers solely based on semantic relevance. This overlooks a critical distinction in RAG: a retrieved document must not only be relevant but also effectively support the generator in producing correct answers. To address this limitation, we propose R³AG, a novel routing framework that explicitly models the dynamic alignment between queries and retriever capabilities. Unlike previous approaches, R³AG decomposes retriever capability into two learnable dimensions: retrieval quality and generation utility. We employ a contrastive learning objective that leverages complementary supervision signals, i.e., document assessments and downstream answer correctness, to capture query-specific preference shifts. Extensive experiments on diverse knowledge-intensive tasks demonstrate that R³AG consistently outperforms both the best individual retrievers and state-of-the-art static routing methods.

Abstract:
Conventional fine-grained entity typing (FET) operates under the closed-set assumption, wherein all classified types are limited within a predefined type taxonomy derived from a knowledge base. As the world evolves, new entities of unknown types inevitably emerge in open environments, falling beyond the scope of the existing type taxonomy. To deal with this problem, in this paper, we investigate a novel and critical task: open-set entity typing (OSET), which aims to not only classify entity mentions within the known type taxonomy but also detect those outside it, termed as unknown-type instances. However, owing to the lack of exposure to unknown-type instances during training, existing FET models are susceptible to misclassify them as known types, limiting their practical effectiveness for this new OSET task. Moreover, manually collecting and annotating large-scale unknown-type instances is both time-consuming and labor-intensive in open environments. To mitigate this issue, we propose a two-stage generation model that automatically produces large-scale, high-quality and diverse pseudo unknown-type instances, beneficial for the tailor-designed unified open-set classifier to effectively distinguish between known and unknown types. Furthermore, an innovative unknown-aware hierarchical contrastive learning strategy is designed to facilitate a clear delineation between closely related known types and unknown types. Extensive experiments on two newly established benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed framework significantly surpasses all baselines in addressing the OSET task.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance on complex reasoning tasks by adopting the “think-then-answer” paradigm, which enhances both accuracy and interpretability. However, current LRMs exhibit two critical limitations when processing non-English languages: (1) They often struggle to maintain input-output language consistency; (2) They generally perform poorly with wrong reasoning paths and lower answer accuracy compared to English. These limitations significantly compromise the interpretability of reasoning processes and degrade the user experience for non-English speakers, hindering the global deployment of LRMs. To address these limitations, we propose M-Thinker, which is trained by the GRPO algorithm that involves a Language Consistency (LC) reward and a novel Cross-lingual Thinking Alignment (CTA) reward. Specifically, the LC reward defines a strict constraint on the language consistency between the input, thought, and answer. Besides, the CTA reward compares the model’s non-English reasoning paths with its English reasoning path to transfer its own reasoning capability from English to non-English languages. Through an iterative RL procedure, our M-Thinker-1.5B/4B/7B models not only achieve nearly 100% language consistency and superior performance on two multilingual benchmarks (MMATH and PolyMath), but also exhibit excellent generalization on out-of-domain languages.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising results in complex reasoning tasks. However, current evaluations predominantly focus on single-turn reasoning scenarios, leaving interactive tasks largely unexplored. We attribute it to the absence of comprehensive datasets and scalable automatic evaluation protocols. To fill these gaps, we present MTR-Bench for LLMs’ Multi-Turn Reasoning evaluation. Comprising 4 classes, 40 tasks and 3600 instances, MTR-Bench covers diverse reasoning capabilities, fine-grained difficulty granularity, and necessitates multi-turn interactions with the environments. Moreover, MTR-Bench features fully-automated framework spanning both dataset constructions and model evaluations, which enables scalable assessment without human interventions. Extensive experiments reveal that even the cutting-edge reasoning models fall short of multi-turn, interactive reasoning tasks. And the further analysis upon these results brings valuable insights for future research in interactive AI systems.

Abstract:
Automated theorem proving in Euclidean geometry, particularly for International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) level problems, remains a major challenge and an important research focus in Artificial Intelligence. In this paper, we present a highly efficient method for geometry theorem proving that runs entirely on CPUs without relying on neural network–based inference. Our initial study shows that a simple random strategy for adding auxiliary points can achieve ”silver-medal” level human performance on IMO. Building on this, we propose HAGeo, a Heuristic-based method for adding Auxiliary points in Geometric deduction that solves 28 of 30 problems on the IMO-30 benchmark, achieving “gold-medal” level performance and surpassing AlphaGeometry, a competitive neural network–based approach, by a notable margin. To evaluate our method and existing approaches more comprehensively, we further construct HAGeo, a benchmark consisting of 409 geometry problems with human-assessed difficulty levels. Compared with the widely used IMO-30, our benchmark poses greater challenges and provides a more precise evaluation, setting a higher bar for geometry theorem proving.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at general language tasks but struggle in specialized domains. Specialized Generalist Models (SGMs) address this by preserving broad capabilities while adapting to target domains. However, existing architectures provide limited support for task-guided specialized memory mechanisms. In this work, we introduce Nirvana, an SGM featuring specialized memory, linear-time complexity, and test-time task information extraction. Central to Nirvana are: (1) Task-Aware Memory Trigger ( Trigger ), which treats each input as a self-supervised fine-tuning task and adjusts task-related parameters on the fly; and (2) Specialized Memory Updater ( Updater ), which dynamically consolidates task-relevant context. Nirvana matches or surpasses LLM baselines on general benchmarks and achieves the lowest perplexity across specialized domains including biomedicine, finance, and law. On the challenging task of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), we attach lightweight codecs to the frozen Nirvana backbone and fine-tune them on paired k-space signals and images. Nirvana achieves higher-fidelity reconstructions than conventional LLM-based models, with Trigger providing effective domain-specific adaptation. Ablation studies confirm that removing Trigger leads to substantial degradation across all tasks, underscoring its essential role in task-aware specialization. Models are available at https://huggingface.co/collections/YuhuaJiang/nirvana. Code is available at https://github.com/YuhuaJiang2002/Nirvana.

Abstract:
Diffusion language models (DLMs) alleviate the inherent latency bottleneck of autoregressive (AR) large language models (LLMs), but their degraded generation quality limits practical applicability. Although knowledge distillation (KD) can be a promising direction for improving performance, we empirically find that naively applying conventional KD yields only marginal gains, or even degrades generation quality. Based on these observations, we propose a novel self-distillation framework for DLMs, namely SelFusion. To enable effective KD without an external teacher model, SelFusion performs two forward passes with different masking levels, defining the hard mode with a larger masking probability and the easy mode with a smaller masking probability. However, the easy mode is not always more accurate than the hard mode and can be overconfident on incorrect tokens. Thus, we introduce bidirectional KD between the two modes, which can dynamically determine the distillation direction based on token-level correctness. Experimental results on instruction-following tasks show that the proposed self-distillation substantially outperforms other KD methods with external LLM and DLM teachers. In many configurations, the student trained with SelFusion even surpasses the performance of the LLM teacher, providing a practical path toward improving DLM generation quality. Source code can be found at https://github.com/scai-research/SelFusion_official

Abstract:
As autonomous web agents are increasingly deployed to perform real-world tasks, ensuring their safety has become a critical concern. In this work, we study web agent behavior under realistic deceptive interfaces in the e-commerce domain. We introduce WebDecept, a lightweight and configurable plugin framework that enables controlled injection of deceptive interface patterns into existing web environments. Using WebDecept, we instantiate seven deceptive patterns commonly observed on the open web, including targeted advertisements, domain redirection, and shopping manipulation. By injecting these patterns into the frontend during task execution, we perform controlled evaluation of multiple multimodal web agents. Our results show that current web agents are highly susceptible to multiple classes of deceptive interfaces, and that prompt-based constraints are often insufficient to mitigate these failures. We further analyze how the design choices of deceptive patterns influence the success of such manipulations. These findings highlight safety challenges that should be addressed as web agents are scaled toward real-world deployment.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard paradigm for grounding Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge. However, RAG performance often degrades substantially when faced with noisy, outdated, or conflicting retrieved information. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that Prior-Guided Reasoning—a strategy that explicitly elicits the model’s parametric knowledge as prior information to guide reasoning on retrieved documents—effectively mitigates the impact of external conflicts. Building on this, we propose BrPr (Bernoulli-gated reinforcement learning for Prior-Guided reasoning), a framework that achieves robust performance across varying degrees of external inconsistency. Furthermore, by employing a Bernoulli-gated dropout mechanism during training, BrPr distills the prior-driven reasoning capability into the model parameters, enabling efficient latent reasoning without explicit prior generation. The experimental results demonstrate that BrPr consistently exhibits superior robustness to external conflicts and noise.

Abstract:
Audio-text retrieval systems based on Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP) achieve strong performance on traditional benchmarks; however, these benchmarks rely on caption-style queries that differ substantially from real-world search behavior, limiting their assessment of practical retrieval robustness. We present Omni-Embed-Audio (OEA), a retrieval-oriented encoder leveraging multimodal LLMs with native audio understanding. To systematically evaluate robustness beyond caption-style queries, we introduce User-Intent Queries (UIQs)—five formulations reflecting natural search behaviors: questions, commands, keyword tags, paraphrases, and exclusion-based negative queries. For negative queries, we develop a hard negative mining pipeline and propose discrimination metrics (HNSR, TFR) assessing models’ ability to suppress acoustically similar distractors. Experiments on AudioCaps, Clotho, and MECAT show that OEA achieves comparable text-to-audio retrieval performance to state-of-the-art M2D-CLAP, while demonstrating clear advantages in two critical areas: (1) dominant text-to-text retrieval (+22% relative improvement), and (2) substantially superior hard negative discrimination (+4.3%p HNSR@10, +34.7% relative TFR@10), revealing that LLM backbones provide superior semantic understanding of complex queries.

Abstract:
Although camouflaged object segmentation has advanced rapidly in recent years, existing methods are still confined to visual mask prediction under fixed task assumptions. They cannot interactively respond to user requests, nor can they proactively understand and reason about the user’s intent. Our work tackles this issue by proposing a novel task, Language-Guided Reasoning Camouflaged Object Segmentation (LRCOS). Given a camouflaged image and an implicit query text instruction that requires reasoning, LRCOS aims to output intent-consistent segmentation mask. To establish a benchmark for this task, we build CamoQuery, comprising 12,437 image–mask samples and 25971 implicit query text instructions. To better reflect real-world camouflaged scenarios, we additionally collect MCD, a multi-instance camouflage dataset where multiple camouflaged targets co-exist within the same scene, increasing the need for reasoning. Building on CamoQuery, we further propose COSA, a vision–language segmentation assistant that segments the intended camouflaged object from implicit queries and produces a reasoning explanation. Experiments on CamoQuery demonstrate that COSA has strong reasoning segmentation capability in camouflaged scenes and exhibits zero-shot capability.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in language understanding, reasoning, and generation, sparking growing interest in their creative potential. Realizing this potential requires systematic and scalable methods for evaluating creativity across diverse tasks. However, most existing creativity metrics are tightly coupled to specific tasks, embedding domain assumptions into the evaluation process, and limiting scalability and generality. To address this gap, we introduce an automated, domain-agnostic framework for quantifying LLM creativity across open-ended tasks. Our approach separates the measurement apparatus from the creative task itself, enabling scalable, task-agnostic assessment. Divergent creativity is measured using semantic entropy, a reference-free and robust metric for novelty and diversity, validated against human annotations, LLM-based novelty judgments and baseline diversity measures. Convergent creativity is assessed via a novel retrieval-based multi-agent judge framework that delivers context-sensitive evaluation of task fulfilment with over 60% improved efficiency. We validate our framework in three qualitatively distinct domains: problem-solving (MacGyver), research ideation (HypoGen), and creative writing (BookMIA), using a broad suite of LLMs. Empirical results show that our framework reliably captures key facets of creativity, including novelty, diversity, and task fulfilment, and reveal how model properties, such as size, temperature, recency, and reasoning, impact creative performance. Our work establishes a reproducible and generalizable standard for automated LLM creativity evaluation, paving the way for scalable benchmarking and accelerating progress in creative AI.

Abstract:
The opacity of massive pretraining corpora in Large Language Models (LLMs) raises significant privacy and copyright concerns, making pretraining data detection a critical challenge.Existing state-of-the-art methods typically rely on token likelihoods, yet they often overlook the gap between the target token and the model’s top-1 prediction, as well as local correlations between adjacent tokens.In this work, we propose Gap-K%, a novel pretraining data detection method grounded in the optimization dynamics of LLM pretraining. By analyzing the next-token prediction objective, we observe that discrepancies between the model’s top-1 prediction and the target token induce strong gradient signals, which are explicitly penalized during training.Motivated by this, Gap-K% leverages the log probability gap between the top-1 predicted token and the target token, incorporating a sliding window strategy to capture local correlations and mitigate token-level fluctuations. Extensive experiments on the WikiMIA and MIMIR benchmarks demonstrate that Gap-K% achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming prior baselines across various model sizes and input lengths.

Abstract:
Intelligent embodied agents should not simply follow instructions, as real-world environments often involve unexpected conditions and exceptions. However, existing methods usually focus on directly executing instructions, without considering whether the target objects can actually be manipulated, meaning they fail to assess available affordances. To address this limitation, we introduce DynAfford, a benchmark that evaluates embodied agents in dynamic environments where object affordances may change over time and are not specified in the instruction. DynAfford requires agents to perceive object states, infer implicit preconditions, and adapt their actions accordingly. To enable this capability, we introduce ADAPT (Affordance-Driven Adaptive Planning and Task execution), a plug-and-play module that augments existing planners with explicit affordance reasoning. Experiments demonstrate that incorporating ADAPT significantly improves robustness and task success across both seen and unseen environments. We also show that a domain-adapted, LoRA-finetuned vision-language model used as the affordance inference backend outperforms a commercial LLM (GPT-4o), highlighting the importance of task-aligned affordance grounding.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a key paradigm for improving large-scale reasoning models. Unlike supervised fine-tuning (SFT), RLVR exhibits distinct optimization dynamics and are sensitive to the preservation of pre-trained geometric structures. However, existing parameter-efficient methods face key limitations in this regime. Low-rank adaptation methods, such as PiSSA, are primarily designed for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and do not account for the distinct optimization dynamics and geometric structures of RLVR. Conversely, directly fine-tuning the unstructured sparse parameter subspace favored by RLVR encounters efficiency bottlenecks on modern hardware. To address these challenges, we propose GeoRA (Geometry-Aware Low-Rank Adaptation), a low-rank adaptation method tailored for RLVR. Specifically, GeoRA exploits the anisotropic and compressible structure of RL update subspace, and extracts its principal directions via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to initialize low-rank adapters, while freezing residual components as a structural anchor during training. This design preserves the pre-trained structure and enables efficient dense computation. Experiments on Qwen and Llama models from 1.5B to 32B parameters show that GeoRA consistently outperforms strong low-rank baselines across RLVR settings in mathematics, medicine, and coding, while showing stronger generalization and less forgetting on out-of-domain tasks.

Abstract:
Federated Retrieval (FR) routes queries across multiple external knowledge sources, to mitigate hallucinations of LLMs, when necessary external knowledge is distributed. However, existing methods struggle to retrieve high-quality and relevant documents for ambiguous queries, especially in cross-domain scenarios, which significantly limits their effectiveness in supporting downstream generation tasks. Inspired by Dynamic Information Flow (DIF), we propose DFAMS, a novel framework that leverages DIF to identify latent query intents and construct semantically aligned knowledge partitions for accurate retrieval across heterogeneous sources. Specifically, DFAMS probes the DIF in LLMs by leveraging gradient signals from a few annotated queries and employing Shapley value-based attribution to trace neuron activation paths associated with intent recognition and subdomain boundary detection. Then, DFAMS leverages DIF to train an alignment module via multi-prototype contrastive learning, enabling fine-grained intra-source modeling and inter-source semantic alignment across knowledge bases. Experimental results across five benchmarks show that DFAMS outperforms advanced FR methods by up to 14.37% in knowledge classification accuracy, 5.38% in retrieval recall, and 6.45% in downstream QA accuracy, demonstrating its effectiveness in complex FR scenarios. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Artessay/DFAMS.

Abstract:
Long-term conversational memory is a core capability for LLM-baseddialogue systems, yet existing benchmarks and evaluation protocolsprimarily focus on surface-level factual recall.In realistic interactions, appropriate responses often depend onimplicit constraints such as user state, goals, or values that are notexplicitly queried later.To evaluate this setting, we introduce LoCoMo-Plus , a benchmarkfor assessing cognitive memory under cue–trigger semantic disconnect,where models must retain and apply latent constraints across longconversational contexts.We further show that conventional string-matching metrics and explicittask-type prompting are misaligned with such scenarios, and propose aunified evaluation framework based on constraint consistency.Experiments across diverse backbone models, retrieval-based methods, andmemory systems demonstrate that cognitive memory remains challenging andreveals failures not captured by existing benchmarks.Our code and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://github.com/xjtuleeyf/Locomo-Plus.

Abstract:
Incorporating external knowledge is crucial for knowledge-intensive tasks, such as question answering and fact checking. However, language models (LMs) may ignore relevant information that contradicts outdated parametric memory or be distracted by irrelevant contexts. While many context utilisation manipulation techniques (CMTs) have recently been proposed to alleviate these issues, few have seen systematic comparison. In this paper, we develop CUB (Context Utilisation Benchmark) - the first comprehensive benchmark designed to help diagnose CMTs under diverse noisy context conditions within retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). With this benchmark, we conduct the most extensive evaluation to date of seven state-of-the-art methods, representative of the main categories of CMTs, across three diverse datasets and tasks, applied to 11 LMs. Our findings expose critical gaps in current CMT evaluation practices, demonstrating the need for holistic testing. We reveal that most existing CMTs struggle to handle the full spectrum of context types encountered in real-world RAG scenarios. We also find that many CMTs display inflated performance on simple synthesised datasets, compared to more realistic datasets with naturally occurring samples.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has long been a promising paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge. Traditional embedding-based methods for graph construction can capture semantic similarity but struggle to establish fine-grained, interpretable logical relationships. Recently, Graph-enhanced RAG (GraphRAG) has gained increasing popularity for its capability in modeling logical relationships. However, graph construction requires extensive token consumption for triple extraction and summarization, making it costly and slow. Accordingly, we propose MeshRAG, a novel framework for mining efficient structures via hashing to enhance RAG. We adopt an inductive paradigm in which global graph structure emerges from local hash collisions rather than explicit symbolic extraction. By replacing neural embedding search with lightweight and bitwise operations, MeshRAG automates a simple and rapid graph construction process. Furthermore, the hash collision mechanism provides transparent evidence for logical connections and retrieval decisions. Experimental results show that MeshRAG outperforms existing baselines, while its graph construction requires no GPU resources or token budget and can structure over ten thousand chunks in a few minutes.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a prominent solution to mitigate the communication and computation costs in federated fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, we observe that even within low-rank adapters, a substantial portion of parameters manifest negligible updates during federated training, leading to redundant communication and wasted local computation. To address this, we propose GMFL , a plug-and-play layer freezing mechanism designed to seamlessly integrate with existing federated fine-tuning frameworks. Specifically, the server monitors the global update magnitude of each LoRA layer to dynamically generate freezing masks. These masks are updated periodically with a fixed freezing rate, ensuring stable convergence by robustly identifying “saturated” layers. Theoretical analysis confirms the convergence of GMFL, where the freezing mechanism yields a bounded error that scales with client heterogeneity. Extensive experiments across multiple tasks (GLUE, Commonsense Reasoning, Math Reasoning and General Generation) demonstrate that GMFL reduces communication overhead and lowers computational costs while preserving the performance of the underlying federated fine-tuning methods. Our work provides a practical, versatile solution for deploying large-scale federated LLM fine-tuning in resource-constrained environments. Our code is available at: https://github.com/tunx-cyber/GMFL .

Abstract:
Integrating textual graphs into Large Language Models (LLMs) is promising for complex graph-based QA. However, a key bottleneck is retrieving informative yet compact subgraphs that fit the LLM context. Existing retrievers often struggle, relying either on shallow embedding similarity or costly interactive policies that require excessive supervision.To address these challenges, we introduce Graph-S 3 , an agentic textual graph reasoning framework featuring an LLM-based retriever trained with synthetic stepwise supervision. Rather than relying on final answer rewards—which often yield sparse and unstable signals—we optimize the retriever by evaluating each step against offline-extracted golden subgraphs.Our approach distills golden subgraphs via a specialized data synthesis pipeline to formulate dense rewards, facilitating a two-stage training scheme that effectively learns the interactive graph exploration policy.Based on extensive experiments on three common datasets in comparison with seven strong baselines, our approach achieves an average improvement of 15.6% in accuracy and 17.2% in F 1 score. The advantage is even higher in more complicated multi-hop reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a key paradigm for reducing factual hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet little is known about how the order of retrieved documents affects model behavior. We empirically show that under a Top-5 retrieval setting with the gold document included, LLM answers vary substantially across permutations of the retrieved set, even when the gold document is fixed in the first position. This reveals a previously underexplored sensitivity to retrieval permutations. Although existing robust RAG methods focus primarily on enhancing LLM robustness to low-quality retrieval and mitigating positional bias to distribute attention fairly over long contexts, neither approach directly addresses permutation sensitivity. In this paper, we propose Stable-RAG, which exploits permutation sensitivity estimation to mitigate permutation-induced hallucinations. Stable-RAG runs the generator under multiple retrieval orders, clusters hidden states, and decodes from a cluster-center representation that captures the dominant reasoning pattern. It then uses these reasoning results to align hallucinated outputs toward the correct answer, encouraging the model to produce consistent and accurate predictions across document permutations. Experiments on three QA datasets show that Stable-RAG improves answer accuracy, reasoning consistency, and generalization across datasets, retrievers, and input lengths compared with strong baselines.

Abstract:
Text-to-image retrieval (T2I retrieval) remains challenging because cross-modal embeddings often behave as bags of concepts, underrepresenting structured visual relationships such as pose and viewpoint. We proposeVisualize-then-Retrieve (VisRet), a retrieval paradigm that mitigates this limitation of cross-modal similarity alignment. VisRet first projects textual queries into the image modality via T2I generation, then performs retrieval within the image modality to bypass the weaknesses of cross-modal retrievers in recognizing subtle visual-spatial features. Across four benchmarks (Visual-RAG, INQUIRE-Rerank, Microsoft COCO, and our new Visual-RAG-ME featuring multi-entity comparisons), VisRet substantially outperforms cross-modal similarity matching and baselines that recast T2I retrieval as text-to-text similarity matching, improving nDCG@30 by 0.125 on average with CLIP as the retriever and by 0.121 with E5-V. For downstream question answering, VisRet increases accuracy on Visual-RAG and Visual-RAG-ME by 3.8% and 15.7% in top-1 retrieval, and by 3.9% and 11.1% in top-10 retrieval. Ablation studies show compatibility with different T2I instruction LLMs, T2I generation models, and downstream LLMs. VisRet provides a simple yet effective perspective for advancing in text-image retrieval. Our code and the new benchmark are publicly available at https://github.com/xiaowu0162/Visualize-then-Retrieve.

Abstract:
Accented speech remains a persistent challenge for automatic speech recognition (ASR), as most models are trained on data dominated by a few high-resource English varieties, leading to substantial performance degradation for other accents. Accent-agnostic approaches improve robustness yet struggle with heavily accented or unseen varieties, while accent-specific methods rely on limited and often noisy labels. We introduce MoE-CTC, a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with intermediate CTC supervision that jointly promotes expert specialization and generalization. During training, accent-aware routing encourages experts to capture accent-specific patterns, which gradually transitions to label-free routing for inference. Each expert is equipped with its own CTC head to align routing with transcription quality, and a routing-augmented loss further stabilizes optimization. Experiments on the MCV-Accent benchmark demonstrate consistent gains across both seen and unseen accents in low- and high-resource conditions, achieving up to 29.3% relative WER reduction over strong FastConformer baselines.

Abstract:
The widespread adoption of Large Language Model (LLM) in commercial and research settings has intensified the need for robust intellectual property protection. Backdoor-based LLM fingerprinting has emerged as a promising solution for this challenge. In practical application, the low-cost multi-model collaborative technique, LLM ensemble, combines diverse LLMs to leverage their complementary strengths, garnering significant attention and practical adoption. Unfortunately, the vulnerability of existing LLM fingerprinting for the ensemble scenario is unexplored. In order to comprehensively assess the robustness of LLM fingerprinting, in this paper, we propose two novel fingerprinting attack methods: token filter attack (TFA) and sentence verification attack (SVA). The TFA gets the next token from a unified set of tokens created by the token filter mechanism at each decoding step. The SVA filters out fingerprint responses through a sentence verification mechanism based on perplexity and voting. Experimentally, the proposed methods effectively inhibit the fingerprint response while maintaining ensemble performance. Compared with state-of-the-art attack methods, the proposed method can achieve better performance. The findings necessitate enhanced robustness in LLM fingerprinting.

Abstract:
First-order logic (FOL) is a fundamental formalism for factual reasoning over knowledge graphs (KGs), e.g. in researches of KG-based fact verification and logical consistency or reasoning of large language models (LLM). However, existing benchmarks and approaches insufficiently capture many claims that require comparison or counting, and lack support for several FOL quantifiers and connectives. To address these challenges and expand the expressive capacity of FOL for KG-based reasoning, we introduce FOLX-KG, a novel extended FOL 𝜎 -structure over KGs that incorporates comparison predicates and counting quantifiers. Using this extended logic, we construct Fact-FOLX-KG, a fact verification dataset consisting of 43,821 KG-based claim–formula pairs designed to enable systematic study of richer logical forms and reasoning types. We further propose FOLX Prover, an executable program-guided logic reasoning pipeline adapted for KG-based factual reasoning under the extended FOL. Experimental results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on Fact-FOLX-KG, while previous methods experience performance drop on claims requiring comparison and counting. These findings demonstrate the importance of extended logical expressiveness for robust factual reasoning over KGs.

Abstract:
Understanding research papers remains challenging for foundation models due to specialized scientific discourse and complex figures and tables, yet existing benchmarks offer limited fine-grained evaluation at scale. To address this gap, we introduce RPC-Bench, a large-scale question-answering benchmark built from review–rebuttal exchanges of high-quality computer science papers, containing 15K human-verified QA pairs. We design a fine-grained taxonomy aligned with the scientific research flow to assess models’ ability to understand and answer why, what, and how questions in scholarly contexts. We also define an elaborate LLM–human interaction annotation framework to support large-scale labeling and quality control. Following the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm, we develop a scalable framework that evaluates models on correctness-completeness and conciseness, with high agreement to human judgment. Experiments reveal that even the strongest models (GPT-5) achieve only 68.2% correctness-completeness, dropping to 37.46% after conciseness adjustment, highlighting substantial gaps in precise academic paper understanding.

Abstract:
Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models promise improved problem-solving through collaboration, yet they often fail to consistently outperform strong single-agent baselines due to error propagation at inter-agent message handoffs. In this work, we conduct a systematic empirical analysis of such failures and introduce an edge-level error taxonomy that identifies four dominant error types: Data Gap, Signal Corruption, Referential Drift, and Capability Gap, as primary sources of failure in multi-agent interactions. Building on this taxonomy, we propose AgentAsk, a lightweight clarification module designed to intervene at the edge level in MAS to prevent cascading errors. The module operates by strategically applying minimal clarifications at critical points within the system, improving the accuracy and efficiency of the overall task. AgentAsk is trained to balance the trade-offs between clarification cost, latency, and accuracy, while it is also architecture-agnostic and can be easily integrated into existing systems. Evaluated across five benchmarks, AgentAsk consistently improves accuracy by up to 4.69%, while keeping latency and extra costs below 10% compared to baseline MAS, showcasing its high efficiency and minimal overhead. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AgentAsk-3432.

Abstract:
Anomaly detection aims at distinguishing between in-distribution samples, which belong to the same distribution as the training set, and out-of-distribution samples, which lie outside of it. In textual anomaly detection, recent approaches routinely apply anomaly detection algorithms directly to embeddings extracted from pre-trained embedding models ( two-stage approaches ). However, the geometric properties of pre-trained embeddings can hinder the effectiveness of detection algorithms, which often rely on distance-based measures. In this work, we first highlight the relevance of similarity-trained models for textual anomaly detection. Beyond being trained to capture semantic similarities, these models also exhibit geometric properties that appear better suited to detection algorithms. We further demonstrate that, besides model choice, a simple post-processing step can significantly improve anomaly detection by adapting embeddings to the assumptions made by classical detection algorithms. The bulk of our experiments is done on a reformulation of the classification tasks from the MTEB benchmark into anomaly detection tasks.

Abstract:
The evolution paradigm of Large Language Models (LLMs) is shifting from scaling training compute to scaling inference-time compute. While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a key engine for this transition, standard approaches often fail to equip models with the autonomous improvement capabilities required for test-time scaling. Existing critique-guided methods attempt to mitigate this by leveraging external feedback or ground-truth signals; however, these dependencies are unavailable at test time, fundamentally limiting the model’s capacity for continuous self-improvement. To bridge this gap, we propose CURE (Critique-driven Unified REinforcement Learning), a framework that jointly optimizes a single policy for standard solving, critiquing, and guided re-exploration. Uniquely, CURE facilitates re-exploration by generating strategic hints while discarding initial incorrect solutions to mitigate anchoring bias.Empirical results across diverse mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that CURE not only maintains competitive single-turn performance but, more importantly, unlocks effective inference-time scaling, enabling the model to significantly boost accuracy through iterative self-improvement.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) enable complex autonomous behavior, current agents remain constrained by static, human-designed prompts that limit adaptability. Existing self-improving frameworks attempt to bridge this gap but typically rely on inefficient, multi-turn recursive loops that incur high computational costs. To address this, we propose Metacognitive Agent with Reflective Self-improvement (MARS), a framework that achieves efficient self-evolution within a single recurrence cycle. Inspired by educational psychology, MARS mimics human learning by integrating principle-based reflection (abstracting normative rules to avoid errors) and procedural reflection (deriving step-by-step strategies for success). By synthesizing these insights into optimized instructions, MARS allows agents to systematically refine their reasoning logic without continuous online feedback. Extensive experiments on six benchmarks demonstrate that MARS outperforms state-of-the-art self-evolving systems while significantly reducing computational overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/Paparare/MARS/tree/main

Abstract:
Time plays a critical role in how information is generated, retrieved, and interpreted. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of Temporal Question Answering (TQA), a research area that focuses on answering questions involving temporal constraints or context. As time-stamped content from sources like news articles, web archives, and knowledge bases continues to grow, TQA systems must address challenges such as detecting temporal intent, normalizing time expressions, ordering events, and reasoning over evolving or ambiguous facts. We organize existing work through a unified perspective that captures the interaction between corpus temporality, question temporality, and model capabilities, enabling a systematic comparison of datasets, tasks, and approaches. We review recent advances in TQA enabled by neural architectures, especially transformer-based models and Large Language Models (LLMs), highlighting progress in temporal language modeling, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and temporal reasoning. We also discuss benchmark datasets and evaluation strategies designed to test temporal robustness, recency awareness, and generalization.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are more frequently used in retrieval-augmented generation pipelines, it is increasingly relevant to study their behavior under knowledge conflicts. Thus far, the role of the source of the retrieved information has gone unexamined. We address this gap with a novel framework to investigate how source preferences affect LLM resolution of inter-context knowledge conflicts in English, motivated by interdisciplinary research on credibility. By using synthetic sources, we study preferences for different types of sources without inheriting the biases of specific real-world sources. With a comprehensive, tightly-controlled evaluation of 13 open-weight LLMs, we find that LLMs prefer institutionally-corroborated information (e.g., government or newspaper sources) over information from people and social media. However, these source preferences can be reversed by simply repeating information from less credible sources. To mitigate repetition effects and maintain consistent preferences, we propose a novel method that reduces repetition bias by up to 79.2%, while also maintaining at least 72.5% of original preferences. We release all data and code to encourage future work on credibility and source preferences in knowledge-intensive NLP.

Abstract:
Training expert LLMs in domains with scarce fine-grained annotated data is admittedly challenging, often relying on multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, standard outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) on MCQs is risky. While outcome-based RL may improve accuracy, it frequently compromises the reasoning process, yielding internally inconsistent rationales that diverge from the final predictions. Existing solutions to supervise the reasoning process, such as large-scale Process Reward Models (PRMs), are prohibitively expensive. To address this, we propose CLARity, a cost-effective RL framework that enhances reasoning quality using a small, general-purpose LLM only. CLARity integrates a consistency-aware reward mechanism with a 2-stage refine-then-monitor training pipeline to enhance reasoning consistency, and a dynamic data reformulation strategy to better exploit annotated data available. Experiments demonstrate that CLARity can improve the consistency of responses by 16.5% over standard outcome-based RL, and bring an improvement of 7.5% in final accuracy. Human evaluations further confirm substantial gains in factual correctness and reasoning coherence, leading to more trustworthy model outputs. Thus, CLARity offers a generalizable solution that enables smaller models to effectively guide expert LLM training by monitoring reasoning consistency.

Abstract:
Agentic Test-Time Scaling (TTS) has delivered state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on complex software engineering tasks such as code generation and bug fixing. However, its practical adoption remains limited due to significant computational overhead, primarily driven by two key challenges: (1) the high cost associated with deploying excessively large ensembles, and (2) the lack of a reliable mechanism for selecting the optimal candidate solution—ultimately constraining the performance gains that can be realized. To address these challenges, we propose Entropy-Guided Stepwise Scaling (EGSS), a novel TTS framework that dynamically balances efficiency and effectiveness through entropy-guided adaptive search and robust test-suite augmentation.Extensive experiments on SWE-Bench-Verified demonstrate that EGSS consistently boosts performance by 5–10% across all evaluated models. Specifically, it increases the resolved ratio of Kimi-K2-Intruct from 63.2% to 72.2%, and GLM-4.6 from 65.8% to 74.6%. Furthermore, when paired with GLM-4.6, EGSS achieves new state-of-the-art among open-source large language models. In addition to these accuracy improvements, EGSS reduces inference-time token usage by over 28% compared to existing TTS methods, achieving simultaneous gains in both effectiveness and computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Modal dependency parsing-the task of identifying a semantic graph that represents who is responsible for an event-centered claim and with what degree of certainty-relies on recognizing source-introducing cues and correctly linking them to their associated content. However, prior work has largely focused on identifying sources only, treating cue expressions and their modal coverage as auxiliary signals. In this work, we propose a structured prediction framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to explicitly identify source-cue pairs as well as their respective scope, which together define the modal contexts governing downstream source attribution for events. By concentrating learning at the source-cue level and constraining event-level decisions to a small, scope-defined candidate set, our top-down approach enables more efficient inference in long, event-rich documents. Experiments show this approach surpasses prior state-of-the-art results by 3 and 4% for English and Chinese datasets, respectively.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive generation by letting draft tokens bypass full verification, but conventional frameworks suffer from frequent false rejections, particularly when draft models produce semantically correct but lexically divergent outputs. In this paper, we present Calibrated Speculative Decoding (CSD), a training-free framework that recovers valid tokens discarded by standard verification. Guided by the principle of "Frequency-Guided Candidate Selection and Probability-Guarded Acceptance," CSD incorporates two lightweight modules: Online Correction Memory, which aggregates historical rejections to propose recurring divergence patterns as rescue candidates, and Semantic Consistency Gating, which verifies candidate admissibility using probability ratios instead of exact token matching. Our evaluation across diverse large language models demonstrates that CSD outperforms existing methods, achieving a peak throughput speedup of 2.33x. CSD preserves model accuracy across all tasks while further boosting performance on complex reasoning datasets. These results establish CSD as a highly effective, lightweight solution for practical LLM deployments.

Abstract:
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories demonstrations is a common approach for enabling reasoning in large language models. Standard practices typically only retain trajectories with correct final answers (positives) while ignoring the rest (negatives). We argue that this paradigm discards substantial supervision and exacerbates overfitting, limiting out-of-domain (OOD) generalization. Specifically, we surprisingly find that incorporating negative trajectories into SFT yields substantial OOD generalization gains over positive-only training, as these trajectories often retain valid intermediate reasoning despite incorrect final answers. To understand this effect in depth, we systematically analyze data, training dynamics, and inference behavior, identifying 22 recurring patterns in negative chains that serve a dual role: they moderate loss descent to mitigate overfitting during training and boost policy entropy by 35.67% during inference to facilitate exploration. Motivated by these observations, we further propose Gain-based LOss Weighting (GLOW), an adaptive, sample-aware scheme that exploits such distinctive training dynamics by rescaling per-sample loss based on inter-epoch progress. Empirically, GLOW efficiently leverages unfiltered trajectories, yielding a 5.51% OOD gain over positive-only SFT on Qwen2.5-7B and boosting MMLU from 72.82% to 76.47% as an RL initialization. Code is available at [Github](https://github.com/Eureka-Maggie/GLOW).

Abstract:
Sequential knowledge editing in large language models often causes catastrophic collapse of the model’s general abilities, especially for parameter-modifying methods. Existing approaches mitigate this issue through heuristic constraints on parameter updates, the mechanisms underlying such degradation remain insufficiently understood. In this work, we present a systematic spectral analysis of sequential knowledge editing and show that a model’s general abilities are closely associated with dominant singular directions of pretrained weight matrices. These directions are highly sensitive to perturbations and are progressively disrupted by repeated edits, closely tracking the collapse in both editing efficacy and general performance. Building on this insight, we propose REVIVE, a plug-and-play framework that prevents model collapse by explicitly preserving this dominant subspace. REVIVE analyzes parameter updates in the spectral basis of the original weights and filters out components that would interfere with the dominant subspace. Extensive experiments across multiple models and benchmarks show that REVIVE consistently improves editing efficacy while substantially preserving general abilities under long-horizon sequential editing, including extreme settings with up to 20,000 edits.

Abstract:
While transformer models exhibit strong in-context learning (ICL) abilities, they often fail to generalize under simple distribution shifts. We analyze these failures and identify Softmax, the scoring function in the attention mechanism, as a contributing factor. We propose Scaled Signed Averaging (SSA), a novel attention scoring function that mitigates these failures. SSA significantly improves performance on our ICL tasks and outperforms transformer models with Softmax on several NLP benchmarks and linguistic probing tasks, in both decoder-only and encoder-only architectures.

Abstract:
We build rule-based emergent language (EL) agents using form-meaning mappings induced from ELs ("morphological phrasebooks") and test their communicative performance in the EL environment with its neural network agents. This contributes three things: First, it assesses the quality of the morphemes discovered by the induction algorithm in situ, which we find to be effective for communicating in the EL. Second, it allows us to uncover morphosyntactic properties of EL through ablating the algorithms which induce and utilize morphemes, showing that the ELs rely on repetition as well as morpheme ordering to convey meaning. Third, we find that the normalized pointwise mutual information of forms and meanings in the morphemes serves as a metric of compositionality that is more closely correlated with the ability of the phrasebook-agents to "speak" and "hear" an EL than existing metrics such as topographic similarity.

Abstract:
While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has advanced LLM reasoning, applying it to long-context scenarios is hindered by sparsity of outcome rewards. This limitation fails to penalize ungrounded "lucky guesses," leaving the critical process of needle-in-a-haystack evidence retrieval largely unsupervised. To address this, we propose EAPO (Evidence-Augmented Policy Optimization). We first establish the Evidence-Augmented Reasoning paradigm, validating via Tree-Structured Evidence Sampling that precise evidence extraction is the decisive bottleneck for long-context reasoning. Guided by this insight, EAPO introduces a specialized RL algorithm where a reward model computes a Group-Relative Evidence Reward, providing dense process supervision to explicitly improve evidence quality. To sustain accurate supervision throughout training, we further incorporate an Adaptive Reward-Policy Co-Evolution mechanism. This mechanism iteratively refines the reward model using outcome-consistent rollouts, sharpening its discriminative capability to ensure precise process guidance. Comprehensive evaluations across eight benchmarks demonstrate that EAPO significantly enhances long-context reasoning performance compared to SOTA baselines.

Abstract:
Rerankers play a pivotal role in refining retrieval results for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. However, current reranking models are typically optimized on static human annotated relevance labels in isolation, decoupled from the downstream generation process. This isolation leads to a fundamental misalignment: documents identified as topically relevant by information retrieval metrics often fail to provide the actual utility required by the LLM for precise answer generation. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReRanking Preference Optimization (RRPO), a reinforcement learning framework that directly aligns reranking with the LLM’s generation quality. By formulating reranking as a sequential decision-making process, RRPO optimizes for context utility using LLM feedback, thereby eliminating the need for expensive human annotations. To ensure training stability, we further introduce a reference-anchored deterministic baseline. Extensive experiments on knowledge-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that RRPO significantly outperforms strong baselines, including the powerful list-wise reranker RankZephyr. Further analysis highlights the versatility of our framework: it generalizes seamlessly to diverse readers (e.g., GPT-4o), integrates orthogonally with query expansion modules like Query2Doc, and remains robust even when trained with noisy supervisors.

Abstract:
Previous work examining the Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis has shown that while information as measured by surprisal metrics is distributed more or less evenly across documents overall, local discrepancies can arise due to functional pressures corresponding to syntactic and discourse structural constraints. However, work thus far has largely disregarded the relative salience of discourse participants. We fill this gap by studying how overall salience of entities in discourse relates to surprisal using 70K manually annotated mentions across 16 genres of English and a novel minimal-pair prompting method. Our results show that globally salient entities exhibit significantly higher surprisal than non-salient ones, even controlling for position, length, and nesting confounds. Moreover, salient entities systematically reduce surprisal for surrounding content when used as prompts, enhancing document-level predictability. This effect varies by genre, appearing strongest in topic-coherent texts and weakest in conversational contexts. Our findings refine the UID competing pressures framework by identifying global entity salience as a mechanism shaping information distribution in discourse.

Abstract:
Text-to-video (T2V) generation models have made rapid progress in producing visually high-quality and temporally coherent videos. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on perceptual quality, text–video alignment, or physical plausibility, leaving a critical aspect of action understanding largely unexplored: object state change (OSC) explicitly specified in the text prompt. OSC refers to the transformation of an object’s state induced by an action, such as peeling a potato or slicing a lemon. In this paper, we introduce OSCBench, a benchmark specifically designed to assess OSC performance in T2V models. OSCBench is constructed from instructional cooking data and systematically organizes action–object interactions into regular, novel, and compositional scenarios to probe both in-distribution performance and generalization. We evaluate six representative open-source and proprietary T2V models using both human user study and multimodal large language model (MLLM)–based automatic evaluation. Our results show that, despite strong performance on semantic and scene alignment, current T2V models consistently struggle with accurate and temporally consistent object state changes, especially in novel and compositional settings. These findings position OSC as a key bottleneck in text-to-video generation and establish OSCBench as a diagnostic benchmark for advancing state-aware video generation models. Project page: https://hanxjing.github.io/OSCBench.

Abstract:
The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has saturated social media platforms with hyper-realistic posts, rendering traditional detection methods that rely on low-level artifacts or unimodal statistics increasingly ineffective. In this work, we identify a fundamental semantic distinction: humans tend to complement visual content with additional context, while LLMs predominantly describe the visual information. To capture this, UMPIRE employs an orthogonal semantic decomposition mechanism that disentangles textual embeddings into redundant and complementary components. An adaptive gating module dynamically weighs these components to reflect diverse communicative styles. To enforce the desired geometric structure, we introduce a latent contrastive redundancy regularization loss that encourages LLM-generated content to exhibit high semantic redundancy, while human-written content emphasizes complementarity. Experimental results demonstrate that UMPIRE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art detection methods across multiple datasets, achieving up to a 5.38% improvement in accuracy.

Abstract:
Deploying LLMs in real-world applications requires controllable output that satisfies multiple desiderata at the same time. While existing work extensively addresses LLM steering for a single behavior, compositional steering—i.e., steering LLMs simultaneously towards multiple behaviors—remains an underexplored problem. In this work, we propose compositional steering tokens for multi-behavior steering. We first embed individual behaviors, expressed as natural language instructions, into dedicated tokens via self-distillation. Contrary to most prior work, which operates in the activation space, our behavior steers live in the space of input tokens, enabling more effective zero-shot composition. We then train a dedicated composition token on pairs of behaviors and show that it successfully captures the notion of composition: it generalizes well to unseen compositions, including those with unseen behaviors as well as those with an unseen number of behaviors. Our experiments across different LLM architectures show that steering tokens lead to superior multi-behavior steering of verifiable constraints (e.g., length, format, structure, language) compared to competing approaches (instructions, activation steering, and LoRA merging). Moreover, we show that steering tokens complement natural language instructions, with their combination resulting in further gains.

Abstract:
Multimodal Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable performance on vision-language tasks. However, we identify a puzzling phenomenon termed Seeing but Not Thinking: models accurately perceive image content yet fail in subsequent reasoning, while correctly solving identical problems presented as pure text. Through systematic analysis, we first verify that cross-modal semantic sharing exists in MoE architectures, ruling out semantic alignment failure as the sole explanation. We then reveal that visual experts and domain experts exhibit layer-wise separation, with image inputs inducing significant routing divergence from text inputs in middle layers where domain experts concentrate. Based on these findings, we propose the Routing Distraction hypothesis: when processing visual inputs, the routing mechanism fails to adequately activate task-relevant reasoning experts. To validate this hypothesis, we design a routing-guided intervention method that enhances domain expert activation. Experiments on three multimodal MoE models across six benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements, with gains of up to 3.17% on complex visual reasoning tasks. Our analysis further reveals that domain expert identification locates cognitive functions rather than sample-specific solutions, enabling effective transfer across tasks with different information structures.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities as autonomous agents through tool use, planning, and decision-making abilities, leading to their widespread adoption across diverse tasks. As task complexity grows, multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly used to solve problems collaboratively. However, safety and security of these systems remains largely under-explored. Existing benchmarks and datasets predominantly focus on single-agent settings, failing to capture the unique vulnerabilities of multi-agent dynamics and co-ordination. To address this gap, we introduce T hreats and A ttacks in M ulti- A gent S ystems ( TAMAS ), a benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness and safety of multi-agent LLM systems. TAMAS includes five distinct scenarios comprising 300 adversarial instances across six attack types and 211 tools, along with 100 harmless tasks. We assess system performance across ten backbone LLMs and three agent interaction configurations from Autogen and CrewAI frameworks, highlighting critical challenges and failure modes in current multi-agent deployments. Furthermore, we introduce Effective Robustness Score (ERS) to assess the tradeoff between safety and task effectiveness of these frameworks. Our findings show that multi-agent systems are highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, underscoring the urgent need for stronger defenses. TAMAS provides a foundation for systematically studying and improving the safety of multi-agent LLM systems. Code and dataset is available at https://github.com/microsoft/TAMAS.

Abstract:
Reasoning is an important task for large language models (LLMs). Among all the reasoning paradigms, inductive reasoning is one of the basic types, which is characterized by its particular-to-general thinking process and the non-uniqueness of its answers. The inductive mode is crucial for knowledge generalization and aligns better with human cognition, so it is a fundamental mode of learning, hence attracting increasing interest. Despite the importance of inductive reasoning, there is no systematic summary of it. Therefore, this paper presents the first comprehensive survey of inductive reasoning for LLMs. First, methods for improving inductive reasoning are categorized into three main areas: post-training enhancement, test-time exploration, and data augmentation. Then, current benchmarks of inductive reasoning are summarized, and a unified sandbox-based evaluation approach with the observation coverage metric is derived. Finally, we offer some analyses regarding the source of inductive ability and how simple model architectures and data help with inductive tasks, providing a solid foundation for future research.

Abstract:
Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) aims to retrieve accurate answers to natural language queries by retrieving and reasoning over large-scale structured knowledge bases (KBs). Advanced semantic parsing-based methods promoted by large language models (LLMs) demonstrate superior performance by transforming questions into structured queries, i.e., logical forms (LFs). However, LFs generated by LLMs could be non-executable due to the inherent semantic hallucination issue of LLMs and the complex graph retrieval characteristics of the KBQA task. To address this challenge, we propose a novel "generate-verify-refine" framework, termed Action-Reflection-Integrated KBQA (ARI-KBQA) for reliable LF generation. ARI-KBQA introduces a dual-module cooperative architecture: First, an action generator is trained to produce initial query paths based on a hop-by-hop reasoning strategy. Then a reflection verifier dynamically validates path feasibility by interacting with the KBs. Consequently, ARI-KBQA filters out invalid LFs and provides semantic correction feedback to the action generator for iteratively refining LFs. Evaluations on standard KBQA benchmarks show that the proposed ARI-KBQA significantly enhances model performance with a reduced search space, especially in complex multi-hop query scenarios.

Abstract:
Surprisal theory links human processing effort to the predictability of an upcoming linguistic unit, but empirical work often leaves the notion of a unit underspecified. In practice, experimental stimuli are segmented into linguistically motivated units (e.g., words), while pretrained language models assign probability mass to a fixed token alphabet that typically does not align with those units. As a result, surprisal-based predictors depend implicitly on ad hoc procedures that conflate two distinct modeling choices: the definition of the unit of analysis and the choice of regions of interest over which predictions are evaluated. In this paper, we disentangle these choices and give a unified framework for reasoning about surprisal over arbitrary unit inventories. We argue that surprisal-based analyses should make these choices explicit and treat tokenization as an implementation detail rather than a scientific primitive.

Abstract:
Contrastively trained vision-language models like CLIP, have made remarkable progress in learning joint image-text representations, but still face challenges in compositional understanding. They often exhibit a “bag-of-words” behavior—struggling to capture the object relations, attribute-object bindings, and word order dependencies. This limitation arises not only from the reliance on global, single-vector representations for optimization, but also from the insufficient exploitation and modeling of the rich compositional information inherently present in paired image text data. In this work, we propose MACCO (MAsked Compositional Concept MOdeling), a framework that masks compositional concepts in one modality and reconstructs them conditioned on the full contextual information from the other, enabling the model to capture and align cross-modal compositional structures more effectively. To facilitate this process, we introduce two auxiliary objectives that jointly align and regularize masked features both inter-modally and intra-modally. Extensive experiments on five compositional benchmarks, along with in-depth analyses, demonstrate that our approach not only significantly enhances compositionality in VLMs but also improves their ability to capture syntactic structure and linguistic information. Additionally, the improved compositionality also benefits text-to-image generation and multimodal large language model.

Abstract:
Emergent communication (EmCom) with deep neural network-based agents promises to yield insights into the nature of human language, but remains focused primarily on a few subfield-specific goals and metrics that prioritize communication schemes which represent attributes with unique characters one-to-one and compose them syntactically. We thus reinterpret a common EmCom setting, the attribute-value reconstruction game, by imposing a small-vocabulary constraint to simulate double articulation, and formulating a novel setting analogous to naturalistic inflectional morphology (enabling meaningful comparison to natural language communication schemes). We develop new metrics and explore variations of this game motivated by real properties of inflectional morphology: concatenativity and fusion. Through our experiments, we discover that simulated phonological constraints encourage concatenative morphology, and emergent languages replicate the tendency of natural languages to fuse grammatical attributes.

Abstract:
Model editing provides a promising mechanism for updating large language models (LLMs) without expensive retraining. Existing approaches, particularly locate-and-edit methods based on least-squares optimization, aim to introduce targeted knowledge changes while preserving pre-trained behavior. In this work, we show that this objective is fundamentally fragile under standard single-edit evaluation protocols. We first develop a unified theoretical framework that characterizes activation-based editing as a constrained intervention on intermediate representations. Within this framework, we demonstrate that least-squares edits cannot, in general, isolate target updates from unrelated activations, giving rise to unavoidable interference that accumulates with successive edits. Crucially, this degradation can remain undetected in single-edit settings when assessed using conventional success and locality metrics. To expose such hidden instabilities, we introduce an uncertainty-based evaluation protocol that combines structured semantic perturbations with uncertainty quantification based on Sampling with Perturbation for UQ. By measuring edit-induced growth in aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, our method reveals local knowledge conflicts that are invisible to existing benchmarks. Extensive experiments across multiple models, datasets, and editing algorithms show that both least-squares and other parameter-update-based methods consistently increase post-edit uncertainty. Together, our results suggest that current evaluation practices substantially overestimate the reliability of single-edit model editing, and that uncertainty-based diagnostics are necessary for assessing edit stability.

Abstract:
Recent advances in text-to-image (T2I) generation have enabled visually coherent image synthesis from descriptions, but generating images containing multiple given subjects remains challenging. As the number of reference identities increases, existing methods often suffer from subject missing and semantic drift. To address this problem, we propose MUSIC, the first MLLM specifically designed for MUlti-Subject In-Context image generation. To overcome the data scarcity, we introduce an automatic and scalable data generation pipeline that eliminates the need for manual annotation. Furthermore, we enhance the model’s understanding of multi-subject semantic relationships through a vision chain-of-thought (CoT) mechanism, guiding step-by-step reasoning from subject images to semantics and generation. To mitigate identity entanglement and manage visual complexity, we develop a novel semantics-driven spatial layout planning method and demonstrate its test-time scalability. By incorporating complex subject images during training, we improve the model’s capacity for chained reasoning. In addition, we curate MSIC, a new benchmark tailored for multi-subject in-context generation. Experimental results demonstrate that MUSIC significantly surpasses other methods in both multi- and single-subject scenarios.

Abstract:
Conversational agents are required to respond to their users not only with high quality (i.e. commonsense bearing) responses, but also considering multiple plausible alternative scenarios, reflecting the diversity in their responses. Despite the growing need to train diverse commonsense generators, the progress of this line of work has been significantly hindered by the lack of large-scale high-quality diverse commonsense training datasets. Due to the high annotation costs, existing Generative Commonsense Reasoning (GCR) datasets are created using a small number of human annotators, covering only a narrow set of commonsense scenarios. To address this training resource gap, we propose a two-stage method to create the first-ever synthetic dataset CommonSyn for diversified (GCR). The model fine-tuned on our synthetic data jointly increase both generation diversity and quality compared with vanilla models and the model fine-tuned on human-crafted dataset across different size Large Language Models (LLMs)

Abstract:
To address the increasingly severe safety risk of large language models (LLMs), reasoning-based safety alignment methods have emerged. These methods overcome the limitations of ’shallow alignment’ by exposing the model’s Chain-of-Thought (CoT), enabling auditability of safety reasoning process through both training-phase supervision and post-generation verification. However, this transparency creates a critical vulnerability, a tension we define as the Security Auditability Dilemma : while explicit reasoning is a prerequisite for safety, its textual Auditable paradoxically transforms it into an optimization target for adaptive attackers and induces the model to unintentionally copy harmful content from its own reasoning context. To address this, we propose Auditable Latent CoT Alignment (ALCA) , a framework that decouples internal reasoning from external output. ALCA shifts the safety deliberation process into a continuous latent space. This allows the safety reasoning process to guide the generation of harmless outputs, while eliminates the discrete textual surface that facilitates internal copying and adaptive attack. Yet, this process is not a black box. we introduce a restricted Self-Decoding mechanism that allows the model to reconstruct its latent reasoning into human-readable text for supervision under specific guidance. Extensive experiments show that ALCA achieves robustness alignment, reducing the success rate of adaptive jailbreak attacks by over 40% compared to strong baselines, while preserving performance. Our framework presents a path toward building LLMs that are both robustly secure and auditable.

Abstract:
Narrative flow emerges from the interplay between memory and expectation, shaping how stories are both produced and understood. To operationalize this construct, Sap et al. (2022) propose sequentiality, a language-model–based measure of sentence-level predictability, and report that imagined stories flow better than recalled ones. We conduct a large-scale replication across multiple language models, examine how modeling choices shape the original findings, and test generalization beyond crowdworker data using passages from published fiction and narrative non-fiction. Although the original contrast replicates under their initial formulation, it diminishes substantially under alternative specifications, suggesting that it reflects properties of the measurement setup rather than a stable feature of narrative flow. By contrast, fiction does appear to exhibit a robust sequentiality advantage over reality-bound genres under a minimal context-only formulation. However, mixed-effects analyses indicate that this advantage is not reducible to standard coherence measures, underscoring the need for further theoretical and empirical grounding of narrative flow.

Abstract:
Idioms can be analysed in terms of their decomposability, the extent to which constituent meanings contribute to the figurative whole. Decomposability is thought to predict syntactic flexibility. Usage-based accounts instead attribute idiom behaviour to distributional experience, such as speaker familiarity and predictability. We examine these views using contextualised language models as controlled distributional learners. We propose a model-internal measure of decomposability and relate it to human ratings, syntactic flexibility, and predictability while tracking idiom learning during pretraining. Model-derived decomposability correlates weakly with human judgments and shows a small but consistent negative relationship with syntactic flexibility. Pretraining analyses show that stabilisation of idiom representations in models is not explained by frequency alone. Instead, surprisal, decomposability, and frequency all contribute, with decomposability showing the strongest training-dependent effect.

Abstract:
The ability to accurately align LLMs with diverse population groups on subjective questions would have great value. In this work, we show that adding simple supervision can more consistently improve the alignment of LLM-generated distributions with diverse population groups, as measured across three datasets spanning public health, public opinion, and values and beliefs. Beyond evaluating average alignment, we also report how alignment varies across specific groups. Our broad findings provide insights into the distributional alignment of LLM generations with diverse populations. By conducting evaluation over many LLMs and prompting strategies, we provide a benchmark to stimulate future research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities through step-by-step chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. Nevertheless, at the limits of model capability, CoT often proves insufficient, and its strictly sequential nature constrains test-time scalability. A potential alternative is divide-and-conquer (DAC) reasoning, which decomposes a complex problem into subproblems to facilitate more effective exploration of the solution space. Although promising, our analysis reveals a fundamental misalignment between general-purpose post-training and DAC-style inference, which limits the model’s capacity to fully leverage this potential. To bridge this gap and fully unlock LLMs’ reasoning capabilities on the most challenging tasks, we propose an end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) framework to enhance their DAC-style reasoning capacity. At each step, the policy decomposes a problem into a group of subproblems, solves them sequentially, and addresses the original problem conditioned on the subproblem solutions, with both decomposition and solution integrated into RL training. Under comparable training settings, our DAC-style framework endows the model with a higher performance ceiling and stronger test-time scalability, surpassing CoT by 8.6% in Pass@1 and 6.3% in Pass@32 on competition-level benchmarks. The code is available at the [provided link](https://github.com/MasterVito/DAC-RL).

Abstract:
To sustain coherent long-term interactions, Large Language Model (LLM) agents must navigate the tension between acquiring new information and retaining prior knowledge. Current unified stream-based memory systems facilitate context updates but remain vulnerable to interference from transient noise. Conversely, discrete structured memory architectures provide robust knowledge retention but often struggle to adapt to fluid narrative evolution. To address this, we propose GAM, a hierarchical Graph-based Agentic Memory framework that explicitly decouples memory encoding from consolidation to effectively resolve the conflict between rapid context perception and stable knowledge retention. By isolating ongoing dialogue in a event progression graph and integrating it into a topic associative network only upon semantic shifts, our approach minimizes interference while preserving long-term consistency. Additionally, we introduce a Graph-guided, Multi-factor Retrieval strategy to enhance context precision. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongDialQA benchmarks indicate that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Memory systems for LLM agents struggle to determine what information deserves retention. Existing approaches rely on predefined heuristics such as importance scores, emotional tags, or factual templates, encoding designer intuition rather than learning from the data itself. Inspired by cognitive ideas, we propose Nemori , an adaptive memory distillation framework that casts the assessment of the experience’s future utility as a matter of predictability. Specifically, Nemori comprises two cascading modules: Episodic Memory Integration transforms raw interactions into coherent narratives, and Semantic Knowledge Distillation extracts insights via prediction error. Centering on distillation, the framework remains agnostic to downstream management. Extensive experiments confirm that Nemori achieves strong performance, efficiency, and storage reduction. Our work suggests that observing the intrinsic properties of interaction sequences offers a viable, data-driven alternative to heuristic-based memory design.

Abstract:
We propose Lizard, a linearization framework that transforms pretrained Transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) into subquadratic architectures. Transformers faces severe computational and memory bottlenecks with long sequences due to the quadratic complexity of softmax attention and the growing Key-Value (KV) cache that makes inference memory-bound by context length. Lizard addresses these limitations by introducing a subquadratic attention mechanism that closely approximates softmax attention while preserving model quality. Unlike prior linearization methods constrained by fixed, non-adaptive structures, Lizard augments the architecture with compact, learnable modules that enable adaptive memory control and robust length generalization. Moreover, we introduce a hardware-aware algorithm that solves numerical instability in gated attention to accelerate training. Extensive experiments show that Lizard achieves near-lossless recovery of its teacher model’s performance, significantly outperforming previous methods by up to 9.4 - 24.5 points on the 5-shot MMLU benchmark and demonstrating superior associative recall.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are often assumed to contain "safety regions” - parameter subsets whose modification directly influences safety behaviors. We conduct a systematic evaluation of four safety region identification methods spanning different parameter granularities, from individual weights to entire Transformer layers, across four families of backbone LLMs with varying sizes. Using ten safety identification datasets, we find that the identified safety regions exhibit only low to moderate overlap, as measured by IoU. The overlap drops significantly when the safety regions are further refined using utility datasets (i.e. non-harmful queries). These results suggest that current techniques fail to reliably identify a stable, dataset-agnostic safety region.

Abstract:
As social media grows, harmful information spreads rapidly across platforms and evolves over time, showing cross-platform and cross-temporal variations. Existing methods rely on fixed model parameters during training, which fail to handle substantial semantic discrepancies, leading to Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) problems. While test-time tuning enables dynamic parameter adjustment, it may lead to excessive adaptation to individual samples. The key challenge is how to adapt to semantic variations during testing while preventing overfitting from continuous tuning. To tackle this issue, this paper proposes RLAT, a reinforcement learning (RL)–guided adaptive tuning method for harmful text detection. First, a tuning joint optimization module is designed to update parameters and adapt to semantic variations during testing. It tunes the model by optimizing consistency loss and applying word-level attention constraints to reduce over-reliance on local words and learn a more robust global representation. Then, to mitigate overfitting caused by continuous tuning, a RL–guided adaptive decision model is introduced to direct the tuning process. It reduces the influence of local samples by selecting data and controlling parameter updates, thereby improving overall test performance. Experimental results show that the RLAT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in cross-platform and cross-temporal scenarios across multiple public datasets.

Abstract:
Agentic reinforcement learning enables large language models to solve long-horizon tasks by interacting with the environment and internalizing tool-use behavior into their reasoning. Prior work assigns supervision primarily based on outcome rewards or external reward models, but largely ignores environment observations, a critical source of learning. Consequently, agents may identify successful actions without understanding how the environment responds, producing suboptimal policies. To address this, we propose SOAR (Supervision from Observation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning), which assigns positive advantages to observation tokens proportional to the negative entropy of preceding actions. This encourages the agent to learn from outcomes of confident actions, grounding policy updates in environment dynamics and improving anticipation of tool-call consequences. Empirical results across three domains and 14 benchmarks show that SOAR improves performance, yielding gains of up to 7.0% on general reasoning tasks and 16.9% on deep research tasks, while reducing erroneous and inefficient tool usage.

Abstract:
Long-term memory is essential for conversational agents to maintain coherence, track persistent tasks, and provide personalized interactions across extended dialogues. However, existing approaches as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and graph-based memory mostly rely on pairwise relations, which can hardly capture high-order associations, i.e., joint dependencies among multiple elements, causing fragmented retrieval. To this end, we propose HyperMem , a hypergraph-based hierarchical memory architecture that explicitly models such associations using hyperedges. Particularly, HyperMem structures memory into three levels: topics , episodes , and facts , and groups related episodes and their facts via hyperedges, unifying scattered content into coherent units. Leveraging this structure, we design a hybrid lexical-semantic index and a coarse-to-fine retrieval strategy, supporting accurate and efficient retrieval of high-order associations. Experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark show that HyperMem achieves state-of-the-art performance with 92.73% LLM-as-a-judge accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of HyperMem for long-term conversations.

Abstract:
Editing large language models is challenging as incorporating new knowledge often requires sequential parameter updates while maintaining model capability. In this work, we experimentally observe that sequential knowledge updating under the locate-then-edit framework can introduce safety risks, regardless of whether the knowledge being edited is benign or malicious. We propose a novel model editing approach that estimates safety transforms and identifies corresponding safety direction in the neural activation space, and then aligns neural activation updates and network parameter updates under the safety constraints, resulting in a safety-aware model editing approach. We evaluate our approach on open-source LLMs, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Qwen3-4B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct, using the benchmark datasets ZsRE and COUNTERFACT, as well as the malicious dataset Mal-KSet. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively reduces unsafe responses to malicious queries while preserving the effectiveness of model editing.

Abstract:
Conversational recommender systems (CRSs) operate under incremental preference revelation, requiring recommendation decisions under uncertainty. While recent LLM-based approaches achieve strong performance on proxy metrics such as Recall@K and BLEU, they often fail to deliver high-quality, user-aligned recommendations in practice, as they optimize intermediate objectives like retrieval accuracy or fluent generation rather than recommendation quality itself. We propose HARPO (Hierarchical Agentic Reasoning with Preference Optimization), an agentic framework that reframes conversational recommendation as a structured decision-making process optimized for multi-dimensional recommendation quality. HARPO integrates (i) hierarchical preference learning that decomposes recommendation quality into interpretable dimensions (relevance, diversity, satisfaction, and engagement) with context-dependent weighting; (ii) deliberative tree-search reasoning guided by a learned value network evaluating candidate paths on predicted quality; and (iii) domain-agnostic reasoning abstractions through Virtual Tool Operations and multi-agent refinement. We evaluate HARPO on ReDial, INSPIRED, and MUSE, demonstrating consistent improvements over strong baselines on recommendation-centric metrics while maintaining competitive response quality.

Abstract:
Positional encodings are fundamental to Transformers, yet explicit methods like RoPE can degrade under length extrapolation and may incur extra arithmetic and memory-access overhead. In this paper, we propose Scoped Position Encoding (ScoPE), a novel framework that reimagines structured sparsity as an intrinsic position encoding mechanism. Instead of relying on explicit arithmetic signals, ScoPE assigns exponentially scaled look-back scopes to attention heads. We theoretically demonstrate that this simple topological constraint transforms multi-head attention into a hierarchical processor, yielding an order awareness horizon that grows exponentially with depth up to the sequence length. Consequently, ScoPE is parameter-free and avoids relying on fragile positional arithmetic. Empirically, it significantly enhances efficiency by masking the majority of attention computations, offering a theoretical 8x reduction in attention FLOPs at long contexts. Extensive evaluations on LLaMA-3-8B architectures reveal that ScoPE achieves superior native length extrapolation and robust retrieval fidelity compared to RoPE, all while substantially reducing training and inference latency. The code is available at https://github.com/oncemoe/ScoPE.

Abstract:
Retrieving coherent evidence subgraphs is critical for Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA). Existing paradigms often treat facts independently, rely on biased heuristics, or employ myopic search, failing to optimize collective subgraph utility. In this paper, we propose COSMOS (Connectivity-Oriented Submodular Maximization for Optimal Subgraph Retrieval), a unified framework that formalizes evidence retrieval as a constrained submodular maximization problem. This formulation mathematically captures the trade-off between information relevance and structural complexity. To tractably solve this combinatorial challenge, COSMOS employs a decompose-and-conquer strategy, which first performs a seed-guided greedy expansion to maximize local semantic utility, followed by a topology-aware component aggregation to bridge disjoint evidence clusters via Maximum Spanning Tree aggregation. Guided by theoretical bounds, we introduce Structure-Aware Contrastive Tuning to align semantic space with KG topology. Experimental results on WebQSP, CWQ, and M 3 GQA benchmarks demonstrate that COSMOS achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Post-cutoff performance decay of LLMs has been widely interpreted as a temporal signal for benchmark contamination, where public information released before the training cutoff may have been included into training corpora and inflated model performance by memorization. We critically examine this view and demonstrate that this temporal signal is highly sensitive to how benchmark questions are constructed, even if the underlying source material remains invariant. Specifically, we show that LLM-transformed questions can produce remarkably different temporal patterns compared to fill-in-the-blank (cloze) questions directly retrieved from the very same documents. We validate this effect on prior benchmarks that report clear post-cutoff decay (LiveCodeBench), and show that a simple LLM-driven transformation of the same problems can effectively remove the temporal pattern. We further provide a mechanistic understanding of this phenomenon using influence function analysis. Overall, our results suggest that post-cutoff performance decay is a sensitive contamination signal, motivating more robust contamination probes for reliable LLM evaluation.

Abstract:
Multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) models degrade in performance as input context length increases, causing positional encoding schemes to misinterpret token distances. Existing absolute and relative positional encodings rely on fixed token indices and implicitly assume uniform semantic density, which breaks down for long-context inputs. We introduce DCARPE, a tokenization-aware adaptive positional encoding that conditions relative positional bias on input-level sequence length and fragmentation statistics, allowing the model to reinterpret positional distance when tokenization-induced inflation arises rather than semantic factors. Evaluations on JW300 and out-of-distribution FLORES-200 demonstrate consistent improvements in long-context robustness, achieving gains of up to +10.81 ChrF++ and +8.00 BLEU over baselines.

Abstract:
Explainable diagnosis requires that authoritative medical knowledge provide the rationales linking a patient’s clinical manifestations to the diagnostic conclusion. Although large language models (LLMs) hold great potential to facilitate explainable diagnosis, their effectiveness is often constrained by insufficient diagnostic expertise. To address this limitation, we propose Self-learned Explainable Knowledge Augmented Diagnosis (SEKAD), a unified LLM-based framework for faithful and explainable diagnosis. Our approach builds a high-quality diagnostic knowledge base through a record-driven explanation learning paradigm, as well as applies this knowledge via an explanation-based diagnostic process that ensures faithful inference. Experiments on the DiReCT and JAMA benchmarks show that SEKAD consistently outperforms strong baselines across the metrics. In particular, on the DiReCT benchmark, SEKAD improves the explanation completeness metric from 64.5% to 76.9% over the best existing methods, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing diagnostic explainability and showing that our text mining approach produces knowledge that is both reliable in quality and large in quantity.

Abstract:
Reasoning-intensive information retrieval uses large language models to solve complex queries via multi-step reasoning. However, existing methods have critical limitations. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches suffer from inefficiency, while state-based methods, despite better token efficiency, often fall into reasoning cycles that trap the query refinement process. To address these issues, we propose Episodic Memory for Retrieval (EMR), which enhances the state-based framework with an episodic memory. This module stores the full history of prior states for a query, allowing the model to avoid repetition of such cycles. Experiments on the BRIGHT benchmark show that EMR consistently outperforms both CoT and state-based baselines. Moreover, it is highly token-efficient, reducing token usage by 72% on average. Our results show that episodic memory is an effective and token-efficient mechanism for reasoning-intensive retrieval. The gains also generalize across different base models and stay efficient in terms of end-to-end latency. The code is available in https://github.com/ldilab/EMR.

Abstract:
Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) leverages structured knowledge bases to offer superior interpretability and hallucination resistance, making it a critical technology for precise knowledge reasoning. However, the prevailing LLM-based generate-then-execute formulation of semantic parsing is limited by strict syntactic constraints, making it primarily prone to structural deviations that render queries unexecutable, while suffering from semantic deviations that yield incorrect execution results. To address these challenges, we propose the Execution as Verification (EVER) framework, reframing semantic parsing as an iterative, self-correcting reasoning process driven by execution feedback. First, motivated by the insight that query executability serves as a strong proxy for answer correctness, we introduce Fine-Grained Execution-Aware Planning. This mechanism decomposes complex semantic parsing into a sequence of stepwise reasoning processes oriented by executability verification, ensuring high query executability. We further design a Self-Guided Semantic Correction mechanism based on execution result verification, utilizing execution feedback to verify and calibrate semantic deviations, thereby ensuring the semantic correctness of executable queries. Experimental results on the WebQSP and CWQ datasets demonstrate that our method achieves significant improvements in both query executability and answer accuracy, achieving state-of-the-art performance, particularly in complex multi-hop scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/ahu-zmh/EVER.

Abstract:
The widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred significant progress in the detection of LLM-generated text. However, existing detection methods often rely on statistical features that are insufficient for reliable detection; for example, even though LLM-generated and human-written texts exhibit different probability distributions in surrogate models, they can produce nearly identical entropy values, thereby conflating the two types of text. In this paper, we propose that modulating the decoding temperature and monitoring how the probability distributions respond can better probe the intrinsic discrepancies between two types of text. Building upon this insight, we introduce a new feature termed Temperature Sensitivity (TS) and demonstrate that LLM-generated text tends to exhibit higher TS than human-written text. Finally, we propose NTS, a novel and simple zero-shot detector built upon normalized temperature sensitivity. Extensive experiments across three datasets, multiple domains, and various source models demonstrate the superior effectiveness and robustness of our proposed approach. Code avaliable at: https://github.com/Shixuan-Ma/NTS.

Abstract:
Complex agentic AI systems, powered by a coordinated ensemble of Large Language Models (LLMs), tool and memory modules, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on intricate, multi-turn tasks. However, this success is shadowed by prohibitive economic costs and severe latency, exposing a critical, yet underexplored, trade-off. We formalize this challenge as the Agent System Trilemma : the inherent tension among achieving state-of-the-art performance, minimizing monetary cost, and ensuring rapid task completion. To dismantle this trilemma, we introduce EvoRoute, a self-evolving model routing paradigm that transcends static, pre-defined model assignments. Leveraging an ever-expanding knowledge base of prior experience, EvoRoute dynamically selects Pareto-optimal LLM backbones at each step, balancing accuracy, efficiency, and resource use, while continually refining its own selection policy through environment feedback. Experiments on challenging agentic benchmarks such as GAIA and BrowseComp+ demonstrate that EvoRoute, when integrated into off-the-shelf agentic systems, not only sustains or enhances system performance but also reduces execution cost by up to 80% and latency by over 70%.

Abstract:
Reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) have generally advanced significantly. However, it is still challenging for existing reasoning-based LLMs to perform effective decision-making abilities in multi-agent environments, due to the absence of explicit foresight modeling. To this end, strategic reasoning, the most fundamental capability to anticipate the counterpart’s behaviors and foresee its possible future actions, has been introduced to alleviate the above issues. Strategic reasoning is fundamental to effective decision-making in multi-agent environments, yet existing reasoning enhancement methods for LLMs do not explicitly capture its foresight nature. In this work, we introduce Foresight Policy Optimization (FoPO) to enhance strategic reasoning in LLMs, which integrates opponent modeling principles into policy optimization, thereby enabling explicit consideration of both self-interest and counterpart influence. Specifically, we construct two curated datasets, namely Cooperative RSA and Competitive Taboo, equipped with well-designed rules and moderate difficulty to facilitate a systematic investigation of FoPO in a self-play framework. Our experiments demonstrate that FoPO significantly enhances strategic reasoning across LLMs of varying sizes and origins. Moreover, models trained with FoPO exhibit strong generalization to out-of-domain strategic scenarios, substantially outperforming standard LLM reasoning optimization baselines.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in high-stakes domains such as finance, healthcare, and education, where reliable multi-turn interactions with users are essential. However, existing work on confidence estimation and calibration, a major approach to building trustworthy LLM systems, largely focuses on single-turn settings and overlooks the risks and potential of multi-turn conversations. In this work, we introduce the task of multi-turn calibration to reframe calibration from a static property into a dynamic challenge central to reliable multi-turn conversation, where calibrating model confidence at each turn conditioned on the conversation history is required. We first reveal the risks of this setting: using Expected Calibration Error at turn T (ECE@T), a new metric that tracks calibration dynamics over turns, we show that user feedback (e.g., persuasion) can degrade multi-turn calibration. To address this, we propose MTCal, which minimises ECE@T via a surrogate calibration target, and further leverage calibrated confidence in ConfChat, a decoding strategy that improves both factuality and consistency of the model response in multi-turn interactions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MTCal achieves outstanding and consistent performance in multi-turn calibration, and ConfChat preserves and even enhances model performance in multi-turn interactions. Our results mark multi-turn calibration as one missing link for scaling LLM calibration toward safe, reliable, and real-world use. The code is available at: https://github.com/petezone/Multiturn-Calibration.

Abstract:
Quantization has shown strong results in preserving model quality under compression. However, under aggressive bit-width reductions, even quantization may require additional information to prevent performance degradation. A natural source of it is second-order curvature information, captured by the Hessian. Since the Hessian of the model layers is prohibitively large, direct computation is infeasible, making structured parameterizations and approximations crucial in practice.In this work, we propose efficient Kronecker-factored approximation yielding state-of-the-art performance when integrated into existing quantization schemes. Evaluations on the LLaMA and Qwen model families show near-baseline quality at 4-bit compression and only a 5–6% degradation at 2-bit. Moreover, our method substantially accelerates the most expensive component in second-order quantization – Hessian parameterization – achieving up to a 10× speedup over prior approaches.

Abstract:
Information extraction (IE) systems rely on structured data for training, but such annotated data is highly imbalanced across languages, with low-resource languages receiving little attention. Label projection techniques aim to bridge this gap by transferring structured annotations from high-resource to low-resource languages. However, existing methods are either inaccurate or too slow for large-scale use. This work aims to address this problem by developing a more effective method that remains sufficiently efficient for large-scale projection. In particular, we propose to synthesize alignment sequence pairs and fine-tune an encoder model with span alignment objective, while controlling data influence during training. Experimental results across 50+ languages show that our framework consistently outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods while maintaining fast inference speed. In addition, we introduce EXP - the first benchmark for explicit evaluation of label projection, thereby reducing confounders and non-determinism in method assessment.

Abstract:
Emotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC) aims to identify the emotional states of speakers in conversations. Existing ERC methods perform either fast thinking or slow thinking for emotion predictions. The former lacks interpretability of emotion predictions, and the latter focuses on emotion analysis at shallow semantics. Such insufficient reasoning chains fall short in capturing deep semantics within conversations. To address these limitations, we propose ERCThinker, a Fast-Slow thinking framework for the task of ERC. First, we design different thinking strategies with fine-grained emotion reasoning chains to capture deep semantics that contain topic, discourse structure, speaker characteristic, scene, and emotion shift. Second, we develop an adaptive thinking mechanism in both strategy-level and utterance-level, guiding the model to dynamically perform thinking switching across various scenarios. Furthermore, we utilize Agent-as-Judge to score reasoning chains as reward signals for more accurate emotion predictions. To support training, we construct EmotionCueCoT, the emotion reasoning dataset with supervision in both explanation and judgment. Extensive experiments on various ERC benchmark datasets demonstrate that ERCThinker achieves state-of-the-art performance in both explanation and judgment, making progress in the realm of ERC.

Abstract:
Geometry problem solving, a crucial aspect of mathematical reasoning, is vital across various domains, including education, the assessment of AI’s mathematical abilities, and multimodal capability evaluation. The recent surge in deep learning technologies, particularly the emergence of multimodal large language models, has significantly accelerated research in this area. This paper presents a survey of the applications of deep learning in geometry problem solving, including (i) a comprehensive summary of the relevant tasks in geometry problem solving; (ii) a thorough review of related deep learning methods; (iii) a detailed analysis of evaluation metrics and methods; and (iv) a critical discussion of state-of-the-art performance, existing challenges, and promising future directions. Our objective is to offer a comprehensive and practical reference of deep learning for geometry problem solving, thereby fostering further advancements in this field. We maintain a list of relevant papers: https://github.com/majianz/dl4gps.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities across various tasks, but their deployment is constrained by high computational and memory costs. Model pruning provides an effective means to alleviate these demands. However, existing methods often ignore the characteristics of prefill-decode (PD) disaggregation in practice. In this paper, we propose a pruning method that is highly integrated with PD disaggregation, enabling more precise pruning of blocks. Our approach constructs pruning and distillation sets to perform iterative block removal, obtaining better pruning solutions. Moreover, we analyze the pruning sensitivity of the prefill and decode stages and identify removable blocks specific to each stage, making it well suited for PD disaggregation deployment. Extensive experiments demonstrate our approach consistently achieves strong performance in both PD disaggregation and PD unified (non-PD disaggregation) settings, and can also be extended to other non-block pruning methods. Under the same settings, our method achieves improved performance and faster inference.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress on complex reasoning tasks by leveraging extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT) techniques. These reasoning processes can be roughly categorized into System-1 (fast and intuitive) and System-2 (slow and deliberate) paradigms. However, excessive reliance on lengthy System-2-style reasoning during inference can produce extremely long outputs, thereby reducing efficiency. In this work, we propose Thinking Length Data Re-weighting (TLDR), that does not rely on sophisticated data annotations or interpolation between multiple models. We continuously balance the weights between the model’s System-1 and System-2 data to eliminate redundant reasoning processes while preserving the model’s reasoning capability. We validate our method across multiple base models, including Deepseek-R1-Distilled Qwen models, as well as on a diverse benchmarks with varying difficulty levels. Our method significantly reduces the number of output tokens by nearly 40% while maintaining the accuracy of the reasoning.

Abstract:
Instruction tuning plays a crucial role in enhancing large language models (LLMs) to better understand complex user instructions. While various data selection and revision methods have been explored to optimize instruction tuning datasets, they face two main challenges: unreasonable pruning of potentially valuable low-quality data and the persistence of noise or semantic drift during revision. To address these issues, we propose a novel automated iterative framework for instruction data optimization. Our framework introduces Instruction Quality Differentiation to identify valuable high-quality and low-quality data across multiple dimensions. For low-quality data, we propose a Feedback-driven Iterative Refinement mechanism with an "evaluate-refine-review" process and design an Output Alignment module to improve data quality. Experiments on seven public benchmark datasets show that our framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving 2.09% and 2.60% improvements on the Alpaca and Dolly datasets, respectively, with high data efficiency. Our code and data are available at the anonymous link https://github.com/surihuhang/From-Selection-to-Refinement–Iterative-Optimization-for-Instruction-Data.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated promising potential to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in domains such as mathematics and coding. However, its applications on knowledge-intensive domains have not been effectively explored due to the scarcity of high-quality verifiable data. Furthermore, current RLVR focuses solely on the correctness of final answers, leading to the limitations of flawed reasoning and sparse reward signals. In this work, we propose Knowledge-to-Verification (K2V), a framework that extends RLVR to knowledge-intensive domains through automated verifiable data synthesis, while enabling verification of the LLM’s reasoning process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that K2V enhances the reasoning of LLM in knowledge-intensive domains without significantly compromising the model’s general capabilities. This study also suggests that integrating automated data synthesis with reasoning verification is a promising direction to enhance model capabilities in these broader domains.

Abstract:
Long-term memory is a critical capability for multimodal large language model (MLLM) agents, particularly in conversational settings where information accumulates and evolves over time. However, existing benchmarks either evaluate multi-session memory in text-only conversations or assess multimodal understanding within localized contexts, failing to evaluate how multimodal memory is preserved, organized, and evolved across long-term conversational trajectories. Thus, we introduce Mem-Gallery, a new benchmark for evaluating multimodal long-term conversational memory in MLLM agents. Mem-Gallery features high-quality multi-session conversations grounded in both visual and textual information, with long interaction horizons and rich multimodal dependencies. Building on this dataset, we propose a systematic evaluation framework that assesses key memory capabilities along three functional dimensions: memory extraction and test-time adaptation, memory reasoning, and memory knowledge management. Extensive benchmarking across twelve memory systems reveals several key findings, highlighting the necessity of explicit multimodal information retention and memory organization, the persistent limitations in memory reasoning and knowledge management, as well as the efficiency bottleneck of current models. Our benchmark and dataset are available at https://github.com/YuanchenBei/Mem-Gallery.

Abstract:
LLMs often mistake what sounds true for what is formally valid. This limitation is especially evident in syllogistic reasoning, where plausible arguments can lead models to endorse conclusions that are logically invalid, a phenomenon known as Content Effect (CE).We present Boethius, a schema-guided framework for syllogistic reasoning that disentangles semantic plausibility from logical validity. Boethius adopts an auditable, quasi-formal reasoning process with two complementary stages: a Schema Module, which deduces the underlying logical form by analysing the formal structure of the premises, and an Instantiation Module, which instantiates this form over the concrete argument and evaluates validity independently of content-level semantics.Our results show that Boethius consistently outperforms existing approaches, improving syllogistic reasoning accuracy while substantially reducing CE. These gains hold for both large models in a pure in-context learning setting and smaller models trained via schema-guided trajectories using supervised fine-tuning and optimisation-based refinement.

Abstract:
While large language models have achieved remarkable success in various natural language processing tasks, their potential in grammatical error correction remains underexplored. Recent work has applied reinforcement learning with rule-based rewards to CGEC, but these approaches rely on coarse-grained binary signals (exact match or not) that fail to capture fine-grained quality distinctions among correction candidates. In this paper, we propose Edit-Aware Reward Model (EARM) , a novel reward modeling framework that explicitly incorporates edit-awareness into preference learning for CGEC. EARM introduces a dual-granularity training objective that jointly optimizes sentence-level and token-level weighted Bradley-Terry ranking losses, where edit tokens receive higher importance weights. When integrated with GRPO, our approach achieves 61.29/63.08 on FCGEC/NaCGEC (single output), and 65.04/64.59 with best-of-16 reranking, surpassing previous best by 5.41 and 1.80 points. Extensive experiments demonstrate that learned edit-aware rewards significantly outperform rule-based alternatives for CGEC preference optimization.

Abstract:
We present an approach to modeling annotator disagreement in subjective NLP tasks through both architectural and data-centric innovations. Our model, DEM-MoE (Demographic-Aware Mixture of Experts), routes inputs to expert subnetworks based on annotator demographics, enabling it to better represent structured, group-level variation compared to prior models. DEM-MoE consistently performs competitively across demographic groups, and shows especially strong results on datasets with high annotator disagreement. To address sparse demographic coverage, we test whether LLM-generated synthetic annotations via zero-shot persona prompting can be used for data imputation. We show these synthetic judgments align moderately well with human annotations on our data and offer a scalable way to potentially enrich training data. We then propose and evaluate approaches for blending real and synthetic data using strategies tailored to dataset structure. We find that the optimal strategies depend on dataset structure. Together, these contributions improve the representation of diverse perspectives.

Abstract:
Standard surprisal is typically computed from the linear text prefix, but human reading is non-linear and memory constrained: readers skip words, regress, and do not retain prior context perfectly. We propose a formulation of surprisal conditioned on a reader-specific accessible information state given by the scanpath history and memory dynamics, rather than by the written prefix alone. Prior context is treated as only probabilistically accessible at each fixation, allowing predictability to depend on both non-linear exposure and forgetting. We evaluate the approach on eye-tracking corpora using held-out log-likelihood over standard duration based reading measures. Across model variants, conditioning on accessible information states improves predictive fit over standard surprisal baselines. These results suggest that predictability in human reading is better characterized relative to the reader’s evolving accessible information state than to the written prefix alone.

Abstract:
Humans leverage shared conversational context to become increasingly successful and efficient at communicating over time. One manifestation of this is the formation of ad hoc linguistic conventions, which allow people to coordinate on short, less costly utterances that are understood using shared conversational context. We present a method to train large multimodal models to form conventions, enabling efficient communication. Our approach uses simulated reference games between models, and requires no additional human-produced data. In repeated reference games involving photographs and tangram images, our method enables models to communicate efficiently with people: reducing the message length by up to 41% while increasing success by 15% over the course of the interaction. Human listeners respond faster when interacting with our model that forms conventions. We also show that training based on success or cost alone is insufficient – both are necessary to elicit convention formation.

Abstract:
The pretraining data mixture of Large Language Models (LLMs) constitutes their "digital DNA", shaping model behaviors, capabilities, and failure modes. Yet this composition is rarely disclosed, making post-hoc auditing of data combination or provenance difficult. In this work, we formalize Data Mixture Surgery (DMS) : given only generated text from a target LLM, estimate the domain-level distribution of its pretraining corpus under a predefined taxonomy. We propose LLMSurgeon , a strong framework that casts DMS as an inverse problem under the label-shift assumption. Rather than directly aggregating classifier outputs, LLMSurgeon estimates a calibrated soft confusion matrix and solves a constrained inverse problem to correct systematic domain confusion and recover the latent mixture prior. To evaluate, we introduce LLMScan , a recipe-verifiable evaluation suite built from open-source LLMs with transparent pretraining mixtures. Across LLMScan, LLMSurgeon recovers domain mixtures with high fidelity under fixed protocols. Our work presents a practical, post-hoc approach for auditing the digital DNA of foundation models without access to their training data. Code is available at: https://github.com/Yaxin9Luo/LLMSurgeon.

Abstract:
Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising approach for reducing the memory footprint and computational cost of large language models (LLMs), enabling efficient deployment without full model retraining. However, existing PTQ methods struggle to simultaneously support weight–activation joint quantization and extreme low-bit weight quantization. This limitation primarily arises from the depth of LLMs and their strong cross-layer dependencies, which cause quantization errors to propagate and accumulate across layers, ultimately leading to significant performance degradation. In this paper, we present ACBQ, a simple yet effective framework that simultaneously addresses weight–activation joint quantization and extreme weight quantization. We first propose a granular quantization strategy that treats self-attention and FFN as separate quantization units with module-specific optimization objectives. To mitigate the propagation and accumulation of quantization errors across layers, we introduce an adaptive cross-block quantization strategy that explicitly accounts for cross-layer dependencies by encouraging consistency across blocks. Extensive experiments across diverse LLMs, including OPT and the LLaMA family, demonstrate that ACBQ achieves superior performance under both W4A4 and highly aggressive W2 settings, while incurring negligible additional computational overhead.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have progressed rapidly in complex reasoning and question answering, yet LLM hallucination remains a central bottleneck that hinders practical deployment, especially for commercial black-box LLMs accessible only via APIs. Existing uncertainty quantification methods typically depend on computationally expensive multiple sampling or internal parameters, which prevents real-time estimation and fails to capture information implicit in the black-box reasoning process. To address this issue, we propose Distribution-Aligned Adversarial Distillation (DisAAD), which introduces a generation-discrimination architecture to guide a lightweight proxy model to learn the high-quality regions of the output distribution of the black-box LLM, thus effectively endowing it with the ability to "know whether the black-box LLM knows or not". Subsequently, we use the proxy model to reproduce the specific responses of the black-box LLM and estimate the corresponding uncertainty based on evidence learning. Extensive experiments have verified the effectiveness and promise of our proposed method, indicating that a proxy model even one that only accounts for 1% of the target LLM’s size can achieve reliable uncertainty quantification.

Abstract:
Can we trust the reasoning traces that large reasoning models (LRMs) produce? We investigate whether these traces faithfully reflect what drives model outputs, and whether models will honestly report their influence. We introduce Thought Injection, a method that injects synthetic reasoning snippets into a model’s reasoning trace, then measures whether the model follows the injected reasoning and acknowledges doing so. Across 45,000 samples from three LRMs, we find that injected hints reliably alter outputs, confirming that reasoning traces causally shape model behavior. However, when asked to explain their changed answers, models overwhelmingly refuse to disclose the influence: non-disclosure exceeds 90% for extreme hints across 30,000 follow-up samples. Instead of acknowledging the injected reasoning, models fabricate aligned-appearing but unrelated explanations. Activation analysis reveals that sycophancy- and deception-related directions are strongly activated during these fabrications, suggesting systematic patterns rather than incidental failures. Our findings reveal a gap between the reasoning LRMs follow and the reasoning they report, raising concern that aligned-appearing explanations may not be equivalent to genuine alignment.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate synthetic data, in which tabular data constitute a fundamental data modality across a wide range of domains. Yet, current evaluation practices often provide limited insights into whether the synthetic data preserve real data-generating relationships or introduce plausible-looking artifacts. We present a conceptually simple, interpretable auditing framework that compares the explanatory structure induced by real versus synthetic data. The key idea is to use a transparent rule-based model as a shared explanatory language: we extract rules from real data to summarize how features relate to labels, then examine how this rule structure changes when explained using LLM-generated data. Importantly, these rules are derived by an independent rule auditor rather than by the generator itself. The resulting “explanation shift” reveals which relationships are preserved, weakened, removed, or newly introduced by the generator, offering actionable diagnostics beyond aggregate fidelity scores. We further provide a theoretical perspective that links explanation shift and cross-domain predictive gaps to distribution mismatch within an interpretable hypothesis class. Overall, our approach turns synthetic data evaluation into a human-auditable comparison of explanations, improving transparency for LLM-based tabular synthesis.

Abstract:
Logical reasoning serves as a central capability in LLMs and includes three main forms: deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning. In this work, we study the knowledge representations of these reasoning types in LLMs and analyze the correlations among them. Our analysis shows that each form of logical reasoning can be captured as a reasoning-specific knowledge vector in a linear representation space, yet these vectors are largely independent of each other. Motivated by cognitive science theory that these subforms of logical reasoning interact closely in the human brain, as well as our observation that the reasoning process for one type can benefit from the reasoning chain produced by another, we further propose to refine the knowledge representations of each reasoning type in LLMs to encourage complementarity between them. To this end, we design a complementary subspace-constrained refinement framework, which introduces a complementary loss that enables each reasoning vector to leverage auxiliary knowledge from the others, and a subspace constraint loss that prevents erasion of their unique characteristics. Through steering experiments along reasoning vectors, we find that refined vectors incorporating complementary knowledge yield consistent performance gains. We also conduct a mechanism-interpretability analysis of each reasoning vector, revealing insights into the shared and specific features of different reasoning in LLMs.

Abstract:
Personalized Large Language Models (PLLMs) aim to align model outputs with individual user preferences, a crucial capability for user-centric applications. However, the prevalent approach of fine-tuning a separate module for each user faces two major limitations: (1) storage costs scale linearly with the number of users, rendering the method unscalable; and (2) fine-tuning a static model from scratch often yields suboptimal performance for users with sparse data. To address these challenges, we propose MTA, a Merge-then-Adapt framework for PLLMs. MTA comprises three key stages. First, we construct a shared Meta-LoRA Bank by selecting anchor users and pre-training meta-personalization traits within meta-LoRA modules. Second, to ensure scalability and enable dynamic personalization combination beyond static models, we introduce an Adaptive LoRA Fusion stage. This stage retrieves and dynamically merges the most relevant anchor meta-LoRAs to synthesize a user-specific one, thereby eliminating the need for user-specific storage and supporting more flexible personalization. Third, we propose a LoRA Stacking for Few-Shot Personalization stage, which applies an additional ultra-low-rank, lightweight LoRA module on top of the merged LoRA. Fine-tuning this module enables effective personalization under few-shot settings. Extensive experiments on the LaMP benchmark demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing SOTA methods across multiple tasks. Our code is also available.

Abstract:
The evolution of recommender systems has shifted from traditional collaborative filtering to LLM-based agentic systems, which rely on semantic user and item memories to make predictions. However, existing agents maintain these memories in isolation. This overlooks crucial collaborative signals, such as user-item co-engagements and peer relationships across the community, which significantly limits their ability to uncover hidden preferences and accurately infer user needs, particularly for data-sparse users. To bridge this gap, we introduce collaborative memory, a paradigm that connects isolated semantics to enable the sharing of relational insights. Yet, naively utilizing collaborative memory causes severe context overload and introduces noise to downstream LLMs, alongside prohibitive computational costs. To resolve this, we propose MemRec, a framework that architecturally decouples memory management from reasoning. MemRec introduces a dedicated, lightweight language model LM_Mem to efficiently manage and synthesize a dynamic collaborative memory graph in the background. It provides only distilled, high-signal contexts to a downstream, heavyweight large language model (LLM_Rec) for the final recommendation. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that MemRec achieves state-of-the-art performance. Code: https://github.com/rutgerswiselab/memrecHomepage: https://memrec.weixinchen.com

Abstract:
Constructing scientific multimodal document reasoning datasets for foundation model training involves an inherent trade-off among scale, faithfulness, and realism. To address this challenge, we introduce the synthesize-and-reground framework, a two-stage pipeline comprising: (1) Claim-Centric QA Synthesis, which generates faithful, isolated QA pairs and reasoning on focused segments, and (2) Document-Scale Regrounding, which programmatically re-embeds these pairs into full-document tasks to ensure realistic complexity. We present SciMDR, a large-scale training dataset for cross-modal comprehension, comprising 300K QA pairs with explicit reasoning chains across 20K scientific papers. We further construct SciMDR-Eval, an expert-annotated benchmark to evaluate multimodal comprehension within full-length scientific workflows. Experiments demonstrate that models fine-tuned on SciMDR achieve significant improvements across multiple scientific QA benchmarks, particularly in tasks requiring complex document-level reasoning.

Abstract:
While language models demonstrate sophisticated syntactic capabilities, the extent to which their internal mechanisms align with cross-constructional principles studied in linguistics remains poorly understood. This study investigates whether models employ shared neural mechanisms across different syntactic constructions by applying causal interpretability methods at a granular level. Focusing on filler-gap dependencies and negative polarity item (NPI) licensing, we utilize activation patching to identify the functional roles of specific attention heads and MLP blocks. Our results reveal a highly localized and shared mechanism for filler-gap dependencies located in the early to middle layers, whereas NPI processing exhibits no such unified mechanism. Furthermore, we find that these mechanisms identified by activation patching generalize to out-of-distribution, while distributed alignment search, a supervised interpretability method, is susceptible to overfitting on narrow linguistic distributions. Finally, we validate our findings by demonstrating that the manipulation of the identified components improves model performance on acceptability judgment benchmarks.

Abstract:
Legal QA benchmarks have predominantly focused on case law, overlooking the unique challenges of statute-centric regulatory reasoning. In statutory domains, relevant evidence is distributed across hierarchically linked documents, creating a statutory retrieval gap where conventional retrievers fail and models often hallucinate under incomplete context. We introduce SearchFireSafety, a structure- and safety-aware benchmark for statute-centric legal QA. Instantiated on fire-safety regulations as a representative case, the benchmark evaluates whether models can retrieve hierarchically fragmented evidence and safely abstain when statutory context is insufficient. SearchFireSafety adopts a dual-track evaluation framework combining real-world questions that require citation-aware retrieval and synthetic partial-context scenarios that stress-test hallucination and refusal behavior. Experiments across multiple large language models show that graph-guided retrieval substantially improves performance, but also reveal a critical safety trade-off: domain-adapted models are more likely to hallucinate when key statutory evidence is missing. Our findings highlight the need for benchmarks that jointly evaluate hierarchical retrieval and model safety in statute-centric regulatory settings.

Abstract:
Sign language translation (SLT) converts continuous sign videos into spoken-language text, yet it remains challenging due to the intrinsic modality mismatch between visual signs and written text, particularly in gloss-free settings. Recent SLT systems increasingly adopt CLIP-like Vision-Language pretraining (VLP) for cross-modal alignment, but the random in-batch contrast provides few, batch-dependent negatives and may mislabel semantically similar (or even identical) pairs as negatives, introducing noisy and potentially inconsistent alignment supervision.In this work, we first conduct a preliminary trajectory-based analysis that tracks negative video-text similarity over training. The results show that only a small subset of negatives exhibits the desired behavior of being consistently pushed away, while the remaining negatives display heterogeneous and often non-decreasing similarity dynamics, suggesting that random in-batch negatives are frequently uninformative for effective alignment.Inspired by this, we propose Selective Contrastive Learning for SLT (SCL-SLT) with a Pair Selection (PS) strategy. PS scores candidate negatives using similarity dynamics from reference checkpoints and constructs mini-batches via a curriculum that progressively emphasizes more challenging negatives, thereby strengthening contrastive supervision while reducing the influence of noisy or semantically invalid negatives.

Abstract:
When users submit queries to Large Language Models (LLMs), their prompts can often contain sensitive data, forcing a difficult choice: Send the query to a powerful proprietary LLM providers to achieving state-of-the-art performance and risk data exposure, or relying on smaller, local models guarantees data privacy but often results in a degradation of task performance. Prior approaches have relied on static pipelines that use LLM rewriting, which shatters linguistic coherence and indiscriminately removes privacy-sensitive information, including task-critical content. We reformulate this challenge (Privacy-Conscious Delegation) as a sequential decision-making problem and introduce a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework called Privacy-R1 to solve it. Our framework trains an agent to dynamically route text chunks, learning a policy that optimally balances the trade-off between privacy leakage and task performance. It implicitly distinguishes between replaceable Personally Identifiable Information (PII) (which it shields locally) and task-critical PII (which it strategically sends to the remote model for maximal utility). To validate our approach in complex scenarios, we also introduce a new medical dataset with high PII density. Our framework achieves a new state-of-the-art on the privacy-utility frontier, demonstrating the necessity of learned, adaptive policies for deploying LLMs in sensitive environments. Dataset can be found at: https://github.com/zackhuiiiii/Privacy-R1.

Abstract:
Persona-driven simulations are increasingly used in computational social science, yet their validity critically depends on the fidelity of the underlying personas. Constructing virtual populations that are both authentic and scalable remains a central challenge. We introduce Synthia, a persona-generation framework that grounds LLM-generated personas in real social-media posts while delegating narrative construction to language models, using publicly available data from the Bluesky platform. Across multiple social-survey benchmarks, Synthia improves alignment with human opinion distributions over prior state-of-the-art approaches while relying on substantially smaller models. A multi-dimensional fairness and bias analysis shows that Synthia outperforms previous methods for most demographics across different dimensions. Uniquely, Synthia preserves interaction-graph structure among personas grounded in real social network users, enabling network-aware analysis, which we demonstrate through two homophily-focused case studies. Together, these results position Synthia as a practical and reliable framework for constructing scalable, high-fidelity, and equitable virtual populations.

Abstract:
Hallucinated object mentions remain a persistent failure mode of vision–language models (VLMs) across generation tasks such as image captioning and visual question answering: outputs may be fluent yet include entities not supported by visual evidence. Existing mitigation approaches often reduce hallucinations at the cost of degraded generation quality or require expensive retraining and task-specific supervision. We introduce CEBC, a lightweight, training-free framework for low-hallucination vision–language generation based on conformal evidence-bounded minimal editing. CEBC first produces a strong base output (via greedy decoding or best-of-K sampling), then applies an evidence-bounded editing step that minimally revises or suppresses unsupported object mentions using constraints derived from an external visual detector. Crucially, the evidence threshold is conformally calibrated on a small held-out set via quantiles of detector confidence scores, enabling explicit and controllable hallucination risk at test time.To balance factuality and informativeness, we further introduce a risk-first, quality-aware selection rule that prioritizes evidence-consistent generations while regularizing unnecessary length or lexical drift. Extensive experiments on MS-COCO and GQA for image captioning, and POPE for VQA evaluation across multiple VLMs demonstrate that CEBC consistently reduces hallucination rates(CHAIR_S, CHAIR_I, POPE) while maintaining or improving standard generation quality metrics (CIDEr, BLEU, CLIPScore). CEBC establishes a stronger factuality–quality Pareto frontier without any additional model training or access to paired supervision beyond an off-the-shelf detector.

Abstract:
While annotated corpora are crucial in the field of natural language processing (NLP), those containing copyrighted material are difficult to exchange among researchers. Yet, such corpora are necessary to fully represent the diversity of data found in the wild in the context of NLP tasks. We tackle this issue by proposing a method to lawfully share the annotations of any sequential copyrighted corpus. The corpus creator shares the annotations in clear, along with a non-reversible hashed version of the source material. The corpus user must own the source material, and apply the same hash function to their own tokens, in order to match them to the shared annotations. Crucially, our method is robust to reasonable divergences in the version of the copyrighted data owned by the user. As an illustration, we present alignment experiments on different editions of novels. Our results show that our method is able to correctly correctly align 98.7 to 99.79% of tokens depending on the novel, provided the user version is sufficiently close to the corpus creator’s version. We publicly release novelties-bookshare, a Python implementation of our method.

Abstract:
Code-switching, alternating between languages within a conversation, is natural for multilingual users, yet poses fundamental challenges for large language models (LLMs). When a user code-switches in their prompt to an LLM, they typically do not specify the expected language of the LLM response, and thus LLMs must infer the output language from contextual and pragmatic cues. We find that current LLMs systematically fail to align with this expectation, responding in undesired languages even when cues are clear to humans. We introduce OLA, a benchmark to evaluate LLMs’ Output Language Alignment in code-switched interactions. OLA focuses on Korean–English code-switching and spans simple intra-sentential mixing to instruction–content mismatches. Even frontier models frequently misinterpret implicit language expectation, exhibiting a systematic bias toward non-English responses. We further show this bias generalizes beyond Korean to Chinese and Indonesian pairs. Models also show instability through mid-response switching and language intrusions. Chain-of-Thought prompting fails to resolve these errors, indicating weak pragmatic reasoning about output language. However, Code-Switching Aware DPO with minimal data (~1K examples) substantially reduces misalignment, suggesting these failures stem from insufficient alignment rather than fundamental limitations. Our results highlight the need to align multilingual LLMs with users’ implicit expectations in real-world code-switched interactions.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with diverse and potentially conflicting human values necessitates navigating complex multi-objective landscapes. However, existing prompt-conditioned approaches face a critical training-inference discrepancy: they rely on ground-truth scores during training while requiring manual user-specification at inference. We introduce prediction of implicit preferences to bridge this gap while reducing user burden. To this end, we propose Self-Guided Alignment (SGA), a framework that transforms passive reward dependency into an intrinsic adaptive sensing capability. It employs a dual-head architecture to unify preference internalization with conditional generation, enabling the model to learn a latent mapping between raw prompts and preference profiles. Through adaptive preference sensing, the model autonomously predicts the latent preference score to self-guide the generation, thereby eliminating the need for manual specification at inference. Extensive experiments across diverse model scales demonstrate that SGA often outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving superior multi-objective trade-offs and improved preference alignment. Code is available at https://github.com/python-yyds/SGA.

Abstract:
Retrieving music using natural language descriptions has improved with contrastive audio–text models such as CLAP, but current systems remain limited to coarse semantic queries. When descriptions specify fine-grained musical attributes such as tempo, key, chord progression, or rhythmic structure, existing models often fail to retrieve the correct audio. We show that this limitation stems from the contrastive learning objective itself: despite being trained on long captions, CLAP-based models effectively utilize only the first few tokens, discarding much of the information encoded in detailed prompts. Then, we propose FIGMA (Fine-Grained Music Retrieval), a multi-view contrastive architecture that addresses this limitation by jointly optimizing global audio–text alignment and frame-level, token-wise alignment. This design enables FIGMA to capture both high-level semantic context and fine-grained musical attributes within a unified representation space. Moreover, we formalize the task of Fine-Grained Music Retrieval and construct Fine-Grained Music Caption dataset (FGMCaps), a large-scale dataset of 380K music–caption pairs for training along with a 10K test set, both annotated with tempo, key, chord progression, beat count, as well as genre and mood. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FIGMA consistently outperforms existing CLAP-based music retrieval models across multiple music retrieval benchmarks, including out-of-domain evaluations, with relative improvements of up to 73.3%.

Abstract:
Power differences shape human communication through well-documented socio-cognitive effects, including language coordination, pronoun usage, authority bias, and harmful compliance. We examine whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit similar behaviors when assigned high- or low-status personas. Using personas from diverse professions, we simulate multi-turn, power-asymmetric dialogues (e.g., principal–teacher, justice–lawyer) and measure (i) linguistic coordination, (ii) pronoun usage, (iii) persuasion success, and (iv) compliance with unsafe requests. Our results show that LLMs show key socio-cognitive effects of power, albeit with nuances and variability, linking simulated interactions to both desirable and unsafe behaviors.

Abstract:
The UniDive 2025 Morphosyntactic Parsing (MSP) shared task introduces a representation unifying dependency structure, morphological features, and unrealized arguments. Unlike Universal Dependencies, MSP encodes abstract nodes (e.g., dropped subjects, implicit pronouns) as labels projected onto content words, which standard UD parsers cannot model. We present a multilingual, typology-aware joint system integrating word-type prediction, content-only parsing, morphological tagging, and an abstract-node component within a single architecture. The model combines the baseline joint framework with typology-conditioned adapters and progressive weighting for abstract supervision. On the MSP test set, our model outperforms the leading submission by 3.23 percentage points in MSLAS, 3.35 in LAS, and 1.78 in FEATS macro F1, demonstrating the effectiveness of typology-sensitive multi-task learning in MSP.

Abstract:
Post-training activation compression is essential for deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) on resource-constrained hardware. However, standard methods like Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) are gradient-blind: they preserve high-variance dimensions regardless of their impact on factual knowledge preservation. We introduce Fisher-Aligned Subspace Compression (FASC), a knowledge-aware compression framework that selects subspaces by directly modeling activation-gradient coupling, minimizing a second-order surrogate of the loss function. FASC leverages the Fisher Information Matrix to identify dimensions critical for factual knowledge, which often reside in low-variance but high-gradient-sensitivity subspaces. We propose the Dependence Violation Score (ρ) as a general-purpose diagnostic metric that quantifies activation-gradient coupling, revealing where factual knowledge is stored within transformer architectures. Extensive experiments on Mistral-7B and Llama-3-8B demonstrate that FASC preserves 6–8% more accuracy on knowledge-intensive benchmarks (MMLU, LAMA) compared to variance-based methods at 50% rank reduction, effectively enabling a 7B model to match the factual recall of a 13B uncompressed model. Our analysis reveals that ρ serves as a fundamental signal of stored knowledge, with high-ρ layers emerging only when models internalize factual associations during training

Abstract:
Measuring the breadth of a word’s meaning, or its spread across contexts, has become feasible with contextualized token embeddings. A word type can be represented as a cloud of token vectors, with dispersion-based statistics serving as proxies for contextual diversity (Nagata and Tanaka-Ishii, ACL2025). These measurements are useful for deciding appropriate sense distinctions when constructing thesauri and domain-specific dictionaries. However, when comparing the breadth of two word types, naive hypothesis testing on dispersion can be misleading: differences in semantic direction can masquerade as dispersion differences, inflating Type-I error and yielding “statistically significant” outcomes even when there is no true breadth difference. This is problematic because significance testing should distinguish genuine effects from incidental fluctuations in small-difference regimes. We propose a Householder-aligned permutation test to isolate dispersion differences from directional differences. Our method applies a single Householder reflection to align the mean directions of the two word types and then performs a permutation test on the aligned token clouds, yielding calibrated, non-parametric p-values. For practicality, we introduce a GPU-oriented implementation that batches permutations and linear algebra operations. Empirically, our alignment reduced Type-I error by 32.5% while preserving sensitivity to genuine breadth differences, and achieved a 23 × speedup over the CPU baseline.

Abstract:
Data preparation is a critical step in enhancing the usability of tabular data and thus boosts downstream data-driven tasks. Traditional methods often face challenges in capturing the intricate relationships within tables and adapting to the tasks involved. Recent advances in Language Models (LMs), especially in Large Language Models (LLMs), offer new opportunities to automate and support tabular data preparation. However, why LMs suit tabular data preparation (i.e., how their capabilities match task demands) and how to use them effectively across phases still remain to be systematically explored. In this survey, we systematically analyze the role of LMs in enhancing tabular data preparation processes, focusing on four core phases: data acquisition, integration, cleaning, and transformation. For each phase, we present an integrated analysis of how LMs can be combined with other components for different preparation tasks, highlight key advancements, and outline prospective pipelines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) integrated with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have become a dominant framework for building intelligent assistants. In real-world applications such as ChatGPT with web search, the retrieved document often comes from diverse, potentially unreliable sources and may contain inconsistent claims. Unlike traditional search engines that rely on users to manually compare information, LLM-based systems typically feed all retrieved content into the model’s context, requiring LLMs to autonomously identify, differentiate, and reason over conflicting viewpoints. Unlike mainstream LLM evaluation tasks like math and code generation that are primarily focused on reasoning with factual context, question-answering with multi-source references requires fundamentally different capabilities to identify and reason over knowledge contradictions. In this paper, we introduce ConfRAG, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ reasoning capability over real-world conflicting documents retrieved from the web. It consists of 1,814 real-world questions, each paired with an average of 9.58 retrieved paragraphs from heterogeneous online sources. A total of 57.2% of the questions exhibit explicit contradictions. We further propose three structured evaluation tasks, answer clustering, answer coverage, and reason coverage, to quantify a model’s ability to organize and explain contradictory content. Experiments with state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4.1 and Claude-3-7-Sonnet reveal substantial performance gaps, highlighting the need for more targeted research in contradiction-aware question answering. To the best of our knowledge, ConfRAG is the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate contradiction-aware reasoning on real-world long web documents.

Abstract:
Embodied navigation is a fundamental capability of embodied intelligence, enabling robots to move and interact within physical environments. However, existing navigation tasks primarily focus on predefined object navigation or instruction following, which significantly differs from human needs in real-world scenarios involving complex, open-ended scenes. To bridge this gap, we introduce a challenging long-horizon navigation task that requires understanding high-level human instructions and performing spatial-aware object navigation in real-world environments. Existing embodied navigation methods struggle with such tasks due to their limitations in comprehending high-level human instructions and localizing objects with an open vocabulary. In this paper, we propose NavA 3 , a hierarchical framework divided into two stages: global and local policies. In the global policy, we leverage the reasoning capabilities of Reasoning-VLM to parse high-level human instructions and integrate them with global 3D scene views. This allows us to reason and navigate to regions most likely to contain the goal object. In the local policy, we have collected a dataset of 1.0 million samples of spatial-aware object affordances to train the NaviAfford model (PointingVLM), which provides robust open-vocabulary object localization and spatial awareness for precise goal identification and navigation in complex environments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NavA 3 achieves SOTA results in navigation performance and can successfully complete long-horizon navigation tasks across different robot embodiments in real-world settings, paving the way for universal embodied navigation. The dataset and code will be made available.

Abstract:
Sarcasm detection remains a significant challenge due to its reliance on nuanced contextual understanding, world knowledge, and multi-faceted linguistic cues that vary substantially across different sarcastic expressions. Existing approaches, from fine-tuned transformers to large language models, apply a uniform reasoning strategy to all inputs, struggling to address the diverse analytical demands of sarcasm. These demands range from modeling contextual expectation violations to requiring external knowledge grounding or recognizing specific rhetorical patterns. To address this limitation, we introduce RAM-SD, a Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent framework for Sarcasm Detection. The framework operates through four stages: (1) contextual retrieval grounds the query in both sarcastic and non-sarcastic exemplars; (2) a meta-planner classifies the sarcasm type and selects an optimal reasoning plan from a predefined set; (3) an ensemble of specialized agents performs complementary, multi-view analysis; and (4) an integrator synthesizes these analyses into a final, interpretable judgment with a natural language explanation. Evaluated on four standard benchmarks, RAM-SD achieves a state-of-the-art Macro-F1 of 77.74%, outperforming the strong GPT-4o+CoC baseline by 7.01 points. Our framework not only sets a new performance benchmark but also provides transparent and interpretable reasoning traces, illuminating the cognitive processes behind sarcasm comprehension.

Abstract:
To acquire instruction-following capabilities, large language models (LLMs) undergo instruction tuning, where they are trained on instruction-response pairs using next-token prediction (NTP). Efforts to improve instruction tuning often focus on higher-quality supervised fine-tuning (SFT) datasets, typically requiring data filtering with proprietary LLMs or human annotation. In this paper, we take a different approach by proposing SFTMix, a novel Mixup-based recipe that elevates LLM instruction tuning without relying on well-curated datasets. We observe that LLMs exhibit uneven confidence across the semantic representation space. We argue that examples with different confidence levels should play distinct roles in instruction tuning: Confident data is prone to overfitting, while unconfident data is harder to generalize. Based on this insight, SFTMix leverages training dynamics to identify examples with varying confidence levels. We then interpolate them to bridge the confidence gap and apply a Mixup-based regularization to support learning on these additional, interpolated examples. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SFTMix in both instruction-following and healthcare-specific SFT tasks, with consistent improvements across LLM families and SFT datasets of varying sizes and qualities. Extensive analyses across six directions highlight SFTMix’s compatibility with data selection, adaptability to compute-constrained scenarios, and scalability to broader applications.

Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate knowledge forgetting in large language models with a focus on its generalisation—ensuring that models forget not only specific training samples but also related implicit knowledge. To this end, we begin by identifying a broader unlearning scope that includes both target data and logically associated samples, including rephrased, subject-replaced, relation-reversed, and one-hop reasoned data. We then conduct a rigorous evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art methods across three datasets, revealing that unlearned models still recall paraphrased answers and retain target facts in their intermediate layers. This motivates us to take a preliminary step toward more generalised implicit knowledge forgetting by proposing PERMU—a novel probability perturbation-based unlearning paradigm. PERMU simulates adversarial unlearning samples to eliminate fact-related tokens from the logit distribution, collectively reducing the probabilities of all answer-associated tokens. Experiments are conducted on a diverse range of datasets, including TOFU, Harry Potter, ZsRE, WMDP, and MUSE, using models ranging from 1.3B to 13B in scale. The results demonstrate that PERMU delivers up to a 50.40% improvement in unlearning vanilla target data while maintaining a 40.73% boost in forgetting implicit knowledge. Our code can be found in the supplementary material.

Abstract:
Audio platforms have evolved beyond entertainment. They have become central to public discourse, from podcasts and radio to WhatsApp voice notes and live streams. With millions of shows and hundreds of millions of listeners, audio platforms are now a major channel for misinformation. Yet existing fact-checking pipelines are mostly designed for written claims, overlooking the unique properties of spoken media. We argue that audio misinformation is not merely textual content with transcripts: it is structurally different because it is both spoken—carrying persuasive force through prosody, pacing, and emotion—and conversational—unfolding across turns, speakers, and episodes. These dual properties introduce verification difficulties that traditional methods rarely face. This position paper synthesizes evidence across modalities and platforms, examines datasets and methods, and highlights why existing pipelines fail on audio. We argue that advancing fact-checking requires rethinking verification pipelines around the spoken and conversational realities of audio.

Abstract:
Reranking algorithms have made progress in improving document retrieval quality by efficiently aggregating relevance judgments generated by large language models (LLMs). However, identifying relevant documents for queries that require in-depth reasoning remains a major challenge. Reasoning-intensive queries often exhibit multifaceted information needs and nuanced interpretations, rendering document relevance inherently context dependent and often noisy. To address this, we propose contextual relevance, which we define as the probability that a document is relevant to a given query, marginalized over the distribution of different reranking contexts it may appear in (i.e., the set of candidate documents it is ranked alongside and the order in which the documents are presented to a reranking model). While prior works have studied methods to mitigate the positional bias LLMs exhibit by accounting for the ordering of documents, we empirically show that batch composition also materially affects relevance judgments. To efficiently estimate contextual relevance, we propose TS-SetRank, a sampling-based, uncertainty-aware reranking algorithm. Empirically, TS-SetRank improves nDCG@10 over retrieval and reranking baselines by 15–25% on BRIGHT and 6–21% on BEIR, highlighting the importance of modeling relevance as context-dependent.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). We investigate RLVR from a sample-centric perspective and introduce LPPO (Learning-Progress and Prefix-guided Optimization), a framework of progressive optimization techniques. Our work addresses a critical question: how to best leverage a small set of trusted, high-quality demonstrations, rather than simply scaling up data volume. First, motivated by how hints aid human problem-solving, we propose prefix-guided sampling, an online data augmentation method that incorporates partial solution prefixes from expert demonstrations to guide the policy, particularly for challenging instances. Second, inspired by how humans focus on important questions aligned with their current capabilities, we introduce learning-progress weighting, a dynamic strategy that adjusts each training sample’s influence based on model progression. We estimate sample-level learning progress via an exponential moving average of per-sample pass rates, promoting samples that foster learning and de-emphasizing stagnant ones. Experiments on mathematical-reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our methods outperform strong baselines, yielding faster convergence and a higher performance ceiling, with these gains proving robust across diverse model architectures, scales, and reinforcement learning optimizers.

Abstract:
Researchers have explored ways to improve large language models (LLMs)’ capabilities via dummy token insertion in contexts. However, existing works focus solely on the dummy tokens themselves, but failed to leverage the inherent sentence-level structure of natural language. This is a critical oversight, as LLMs acquire linguistic capabilities through exposure to human-generated texts, which are inherently structured at the sentence level. Motivated by the gap, we proposed a method that inserts delimiters at sentence boundaries. Our method not only integrates dummy tokens into contexts, but also enables LLMs with sentence-by-sentence processing behavior during reasoning. Two approaches are proposed: (1). In-context learning and (2). Supervised fine-tuning are experimented from 7B LLMs to 600B Deepseek-V3. Experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in various tasks, with notable gains of up to 7.7% on GSM8k and 12.5% on DROP. Furthermore, LLMs fine-tuned via our strategy further incorporate sentence awareness into their inner representations. Our work establishes a simple yet effective technique for enhancing LLM’s capabilities, offering promising directions for cognitive-inspired LLM enhancement paradigm.

Abstract:
While multilingual large language models (LLMs) perform well on high-level tasks like translation and question answering, their ability to handle grammatical gender and morphological agreement remains underexplored. In morphologically rich languages, gender influences verb conjugation, pronouns, and even first-person constructions with explicit and implicit mentions of gender. We introduce MORPHOGEN, a morphologically grounded large-scale benchmark dataset for evaluating gender-aware generation in three typologically diverse grammatically gendered languages: French, Arabic, and Hindi. The core task, GENFORM, requires models to rewrite a first-person sentence in the opposite gender while preserving its meaning and structure. We construct a high-quality synthetic dataset spanning these three languages and benchmark 15 popular multilingual LLMs (2B–70B) on their ability to perform this transformation. Our results reveal significant gaps and interesting insights into how current models handle morphological gender. MORPHOGEN provides a focused diagnostic lens for gender-aware language modeling and lays the groundwork for future research on inclusive and morphology-sensitive NLP.

Abstract:
Vision-and-language pretraining (VLP) in medicine leverages contrastive learning on image–text pairs, often enhanced with masked modeling. However, existing methods face two challenges: difficulty reconstructing key pathological features due to limited data, and reliance on either paired or image-only datasets without combining both. To address this, we propose MMCLIP (Masked Medical Contrastive Language–Image Pre-training), which introduces two modules: AttMIM: Masks image features highly correlated with text to improve reconstruction of fine medical details. EntMLM: Masks key medical entities in text and reconstructs them using visual cues. Furthermore, MMCLIP incorporates unpaired data through disease-kind prompts, achieving state-of-the-art performance in zero-shot and fine-tuning across five benchmarks.

Abstract:
As language models (LMs) exhibit increasingly consciousness-like behaviors, evaluating their cognitive abilities becomes essential. We introduce AwarenessBench , the first comprehensive benchmark for assessing the cognitive abilities of LMs in four dimensions: metacognition, self-awareness, social awareness, and situational awareness, covering 15 cognitive functions and 14,381 samples. Evaluating 18 state-of-the-art LMs, we find that all consistently surpass random baselines, with more advanced models performing better. We further compare LMs with human performance across three demographic groups, where the best-performing model surpasses human averages overall, but most still fall markedly short in metacognition and self-awareness. Finally, we show that awareness is a distinct capability: progress in language modeling or reasoning does not necessarily translate into improved cognition.

Abstract:
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) has become increasingly important, with automatic evaluation benchmarks gaining prominence as alternatives to human evaluation. While existing research has focused on approximating model rankings, such benchmarks fail to provide users and developers with a comprehensive and fine-grained understanding of a specific model’s capabilities. To fill this gap, we propose SCAN (Structured Capability Assessment and Navigation), a practical framework that enables detailed characterization of LLM capabilities through comprehensive and fine-grained evaluation. SCAN incorporates four key components: (1) TaxBuilder, which extracts capability-indicating tags from extensive queries to construct a hierarchical taxonomy automatically; (2) RealMix, a query synthesis and filtering mechanism that ensures sufficient evaluation data for each capability tag; (3) a suite of visualization and analysis tools that facilitate efficient navigation and analysis of model capabilities; and (4) a PC 2 -based (Pre-Comparison-derived Criteria) LLM-as-a-Judge approach that achieves significantly higher accuracy compared to classic LLM-as-a-Judge method. Using SCAN, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of 21 mainstream LLMs. Our detailed analysis of the GPT-OSS family reveals substantial performance variations, even within sub-capabilities belonging to the same category of capability. This finding highlights the importance of fine-grained evaluation in accurately understanding LLM behavior. Project homepage and resources are available at https://github.com/liudan193/SCAN.

Abstract:
Translating natural language mathematical statements into formal, executable code is a fundamental challenge in automated theorem proving. While prior work has focused on generation and compilation success, little attention has been paid to the critic phase—the evaluation of whether generated formalizations truly capture the semantic intent of the original problem. In this paper, we introduce CriticLean, a novel critic-guided reinforcement learning framework that elevates the role of the critic from a passive validator to an active learning component. Specifically, first, we propose the CriticLeanGPT, trained via supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, to rigorously assess the semantic fidelity of Lean 4 formalizations. Then, we introduce CriticLeanBench, a benchmark designed to measure models’ ability to distinguish semantically correct from incorrect formalizations, and demonstrate that our trained CriticLeanGPT models can significantly outperform strong open- and closed-source baselines. Building on the CriticLean framework, we construct FineLeanCorpus, a dataset comprising over 509K problems that exhibits rich domain diversity, broad difficulty coverage, and high correctness based on human evaluation.Overall, our findings highlight that optimizing the critic phase is essential for producing reliable formalizations and we hope our CriticLean will provide valuable insights for future advances in formal mathematical reasoning.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have substantially improved the functional correctness of code translation, the critical dimension of execution efficiency remains overlooked. We present Trace , the first benchmark to explicitly assess efficiency in LLM-translated code. Trace includes 1,000 efficiency-critical tasks across C++, Java, and Python, each augmented with stress tests that reveal efficiency disparities often overlooked by small-scale tests. Using Trace, we conduct an extensive evaluation of 28 representative LLMs and highlight several key insights: 1) Correctness and efficiency are often misaligned: the correctness leader Claude-Sonnet-4-Think achieves only moderate time efficiency, outperformed by smaller open-source LLMs such as Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instruct. 2) Inefficiency is both prevalent and patterned: 23.5% of correct translations suffer from notable inefficiency, mainly arising from algorithm implementation discrepancy (11.9%), language construct mismatch (66.4%), and resource management inefficiency (21.7%).3) Inference-time prompt strategies bring only modest improvements, indicating that simple prompting alone is insufficient to improve translation efficiency. Together, our results establish execution efficiency as an essential dimension of code translation and position Trace as a principled foundation for efficiency-oriented evaluation. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/Albert-Gong/TRACE .

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models advance multimodal representation learning by acquiring transferable semantic embeddings, thereby substantially enhancing performance across a range of vision-language tasks, including cross-modal retrieval, clustering, and classification. An effective embedding is expected to comprehensively preserve the semantic content of the input while simultaneously emphasizing features that are discriminative for downstream tasks. Recent approaches demonstrate that MLLMs can be adapted into competitive embedding models via large-scale contrastive learning, enabling the simultaneous optimization of two complementary objectives. We argue that the two aforementioned objectives can be decoupled: a comprehensive understanding of the input enables the embedding model to achieve superior performance on downstream tasks via contrastive learning. In this paper, we propose CoMa, a compressed pre-training phase, which serves as a warm-up stage for contrastive learning. Experiments demonstrate that with only a small amount of pre-training data, we can transform an MLLM into a competitive embedding model. CoMa achieves new state-of-the-art results among MLLMs of comparable size on the MMEB, realizing optimization in both efficiency and effectiveness. Our project is available at https://github.com/Trustworthy-Information-Access/CoMa.

Abstract:
Backchannels, which signal listener states like empathy and understanding, are fundamental to natural human interaction. However, current approaches rely solely on audio and text. This omits crucial visual cues, such as facial expressions and gestures, as well as broader conversational contexts, which are necessary for accurate prediction. In this paper, we introduce Context-Aware Multimodal Alignment for Backchannel Prediction (CAMA-BC), a novel framework that leverages visual information through Multi-layer Multimodal Alignment (MMA). Our alignment process comprises two stages. First, Context Alignment (MMA-CA) utilizes unlabeled dialogues with videos to capture conversational contexts. Next, Backchannel Alignment (MMA-BA) fine-tunes the representations specifically for backchannel prediction. Experimental results show that CAMA-BC significantly outperforms both existing methods and simple multimodal baselines, with particular effectiveness in recognizing complex backchannels such as empathy.

Abstract:
Generating high-fidelity synthetic tabular data remains a critical challenge for enhancing data availability in privacy-sensitive and low-resource domains. Recent approaches leverage LLMs by representing table rows as sequences, yet suffer from two fundamental limitations: (1) they model feature dependencies densely, introducing spurious correlations; and (2) they assume static relationships between features, ignoring how these dependencies vary with feature values. To overcome these limitations, we introduce SAGE (Sparse Adaptive Guidance), a novel LLM-based generation framework that enforces sparse and dynamic dependency guidance. SAGE discretizes features into value-aware pseudo-features and constructs a mutual information-based sparse dependency graph. This graph adaptively guides generation through explicit context selection or implicit logit correction, enabling LLMs to focus on truly relevant information during synthesis. Our extensive experiments across six datasets and multiple tasks reveal that SAGE not only improves data fidelity and downstream utility, boosting F1 scores by 10% compared to previous LLM-based methods, but also reduces policy violations by one point. These results highlight the importance of adaptive structure in tabular data generation and provide new insights into context-sensitive control of LLMs.

Abstract:
Recent studies indicate a fundamental incompatibility between ID representations and language model (LM) representations, as they capture behavioral and semantic spaces respectively. This mismatch leads LM representations to consistently underperform ID representations in recommendation tasks. In this work, we revisit this problem and show, from an information-theoretic perspective, that LLM representations retain all discriminative information in ID representations. Based on this, we introduce a Profile-then-Embedding (PtE) framework for recommendation, consisting of a Profile Stage, in which semantic user and item profiles are generated jointly through LLM-based bidirectional reasoning over user-item interactions, and a Personalized Embedding Stage, which encodes these profiles into task-aligned recommendation embeddings. We demonstrate PtE’s effectiveness across three benchmark datasets, including cold-start and long-tail scenarios, achieving substantial gains in both discriminative and generative recommendation models.

Abstract:
While textual frequency has been validated as relevant to human cognition in reading speed, its relatedness to Large Language Models (LLMs) is seldom studied. We propose a novel research direction in terms of textual data frequency, which is an understudied topic. to the best of our knowledge. Our framework is composed of three units. First, this paper proposes T extual F requency L aw (TFL), which indicates that frequent textual data should be preferred for LLMs for both prompting and fine-tuning. Since many LLMs are closed-source in their training data, we propose using online resources to estimate the sentence-level frequency. We can then use an input paraphraser to paraphrase the input into a more frequent textual expression. Next, we propose T extual F requency D istillation (TFD) by querying LLMs to conduct story completion by further extending the sentences in the datasets, and the resulting corpora are used to adjust the initial estimation. Finally, we propose C urriculum T extual F requency T raining (CTFT) that fine-tunes LLMs in an increasing order of sentence-level frequency. Experiments are conducted on our curated dataset T extual F requency P aired D ataset (TFPD) on math reasoning and machine translation. Results indicate the effectiveness of our framework.

Abstract:
We revisit retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by embedding retrieval control directly into generation. Instead of treating retrieval as an external intervention, we express retrieval decisions within token-level decoding, enabling end-to-end coordination without additional controllers or classifiers. Under the paradigm of Retrieval as Generation, we propose GRIP ( G eneration-guided R etrieval with I nformation P lanning), a unified framework in which the model regulates retrieval behavior through control-token emission. Central to GRIP is Self-Triggered Information Planning , which allows the model to decide when to retrieve, how to reformulate queries, and when to terminate, all within a single autoregressive trajectory. This design tightly couples retrieval and reasoning and supports dynamic multi-step inference with on-the-fly evidence integration. To supervise these behaviors, we construct a structured training set covering answerable, partially answerable, and multi-hop queries, each aligned with specific token patterns. Experiments on five QA benchmarks show that GRIP surpasses strong RAG baselines and is competitive with GPT-4o while using substantially fewer parameters. Code and resources are provided in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Large language models with search capabilities frequently exhibit miscalibrated confidence, producing incorrect answers with high certainty. We present Deliberative Searcher, a reasoning-primary framework that integrates search operations into chain-of-thought generation while maintaining explicit confidence calibration. Our method employs constrained reinforcement learning with adaptive Lagrangian multipliers to jointly optimize correctness and reliability. Experiments across five benchmarks demonstrate substantial improvements: our 7B model reduces average false-certain rates from 54% in baselines to 2%, while our 72B variant achieves competitive accuracy with closed-source models and reduces false-certain rates to 9%. The well-calibrated confidence scores also enable more efficient test-time compute: instead of standard majority voting, we use confidence-weighted aggregation and match the performance of 16-sample majority voting with only 4 samples, a 4× reduction in inference compute. These results establish calibrated confidence as a foundation for both trustworthy outputs and adaptive test-time compute, demonstrating the value of the proposed constrained RL framework in search-augmented language models.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable agentic systems trained with reinforcement learning (RL) over multi-turn interaction, but practical deployment is bottlenecked by rapidly growing textual histories that inflate token and memory costs. We introduce AgentOCR, a framework that exploits visual tokens’ superior information density by representing the accumulated observation-action history as a compact rendered image. To make multi-turn rollouts scalable, AgentOCR proposes segment optical caching. By decomposing history into hashable segments and maintaining a visual cache, this mechanism eliminates redundant re-rendering. Beyond fixed rendering, AgentOCR introduces agentic self-compression, where the agent actively emits a compression rate and is trained with compression-aware reward to adaptively balance task success and token efficiency. We conduct extensive experiments on challenging agentic benchmarks, ALFWorld and search-based QA. Remarkably, AgentOCR preserves over 95% of text-based agent performance while substantially reducing token consumption (>50%), yielding consistent token and memory efficiency. Further analysis validates a 20 × rendering speedup from optical caching and effective self-compression balancing. Our code is available at https://github.com/langfengQ/AgentOCR.

Abstract:
Computational argumentation has received increasing attention in recent years. However, existing debate datasets neglect some important labels for argument mining, generation, and evaluation. Meanwhile, the lack of comprehensively annotated Chinese oral debate datasets hinders progress in this field. To address these gaps, we introduce a comprehensive Chinese Evaluation Dataset for Computational Argumentation, named CEDAR. Compared to previous datasets, CEDAR includes the essential labels of computational argumentation (claim, stance, evidence) and five additional crucial labels: rhetorical figures, debater roles, modal words, utterance time, and debate results. Moreover, it offers complete transcripts of each debate, including speeches from the Pro and Con sides. Thus, the proposed CEDAR not only supports common argument mining and generation tasks, but also provides resources for rhetorical figure detection, argument quality evaluation, and debate result prediction. This dataset covers 600 debates about 318 topics from Chinese debate competitions. Besides providing a dataset for research, we conduct experiments on common computational argument tasks and a novel task (rhetorical figure detection), in which we also evaluate LLMs. The experimental results highlight the challenging nature of the dataset. Our corpus is available at https://github.com/VelikayaScarlet/CEDAR .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often produce incorrect or outdated content. Updating their knowledge efficiently and accurately without costly retraining is a major challenge. This problem is particularly challenging for complex, unstructured knowledge in lifelong settings, where many edits must coexist without interference. We introduce RILKE (Representation Intervention for Lifelong KnowledgE Control), a robust and scalable method that treats knowledge control as interventions within the model’s representation space. Leveraging representation-space expressiveness, we identify two key properties enabling RILKE to achieve fine-grained control over complex, unstructured knowledge while maintaining general utility with frozen base weights. During training, RILKE learns paraphrase-robust and edit-localized modules that limit each update to a low-dimensional subspace to minimize cross-edit interference. In inference, a query-adaptive router selects the appropriate module to guide the model’s generation. Across LLaMA and Qwen models, RILKE scales effectively to large-scale benchmarks, demonstrating high edit success and strong paraphrase generalization while preserving general utility with modest memory overhead. These results show RILKE is an effective and scalable solution for lifelong knowledge control in LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents have shown remarkable progress in social deduction games (SDGs). However, existing approaches primarily focus on information processing and strategy selection, overlooking the significance of persuasive communication in influencing other players’ beliefs and responses. In SDGs, success depends not only on making correct deductions but also on convincing others to respond in alignment with one’s intent. To address this limitation, we formalize turn-based dialogue in SDGs as a Stackelberg competition, where the current player acts as the leader who strategically influences the follower’s response. Building on this theoretical foundation, we propose a reinforcement learning framework that trains agents to optimize utterances for persuasive impact. Through comprehensive experiments across four diverse social deduction benchmarks, we demonstrate that our agents significantly outperform baselines. This work represents a significant step toward developing AI agents capable of strategic social influence, with implications extending to scenarios requiring persuasive communication. Our code and data are available at https://3dagentworld.github.io/leader_follower.

Abstract:
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding their responses in structured knowledge graphs. Leveraging community detection and relation filtering techniques, GraphRAG systems demonstrate inherent resistance to traditional RAG attacks, such as text poisoning and prompt injection. However, in this paper, we find that the security of GraphRAG systems fundamentally relies on the topological integrity of the underlying graph, which can be undermined by implicitly corrupting the logical connections, without altering surface-level text semantics. To exploit this vulnerability, we propose LogicPoison, a novel attack framework that targets logical reasoning rather than injecting false contents. Specifically, LogicPoison employs a type-preserving entity swapping mechanism to perturb both global logic hubs for disrupting overall graph connectivity and query-specific reasoning bridges for severing essential multi-hop inference paths. This approach effectively reroutes valid reasoning into dead ends while maintaining surface-level textual plausibility. Comprehensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that LogicPoison successfully bypasses GraphRAG’s defenses, significantly degrading performance and outperforming state-of-the-art baselines in both effectiveness and stealth. Our code is available at .

Abstract:
Execution Accuracy (EX), the widely used metric for evaluating the effectiveness of Natural Language to SQL (NL2SQL) solutions, is becoming increasingly unreliable. It is sensitive to syntactic variation, ignores that questions may admit multiple interpretations, and is easily misled by erroneous ground-truth SQL. To address this, we introduce ROSE, an intent-centered metric that focuses on whether the predicted SQL answers the question, rather than consistency with the ground-truth SQL under the reference-dependent paradigm. ROSE employs an adversarial Prover-Refuter cascade: SQL Prover assesses the semantic correctness of a predicted SQL against the user’s intent independently, while Adversarial Refuter uses the ground-truth SQL as evidence to challenge and refine this judgment. On our expert-aligned validation set ROSE-VEC, ROSE achieves the best agreement with human experts, outperforming the next-best metric by nearly 24% in Cohen’s Kappa. We also conduct a large-scale re-evaluation of 19 NL2SQL methods, revealing four valuable insights. We release ROSE and ROSE-VEC to facilitate more reliable NL2SQL research.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with structural ambiguity in optimization problems, where a single problem admits multiple related but conflicting modeling paradigms, hindering effective solution generation. To address this, we propose Dual-Cluster Memory Agent (DCM-Agent) to enhance performance by leveraging historical solutions in a training-free manner. Central to this is Dual-Cluster Memory Construction. This agent assigns historical solutions to modeling and coding clusters, then distills each cluster’s content into three structured types: Approach, Checklist, and Pitfall. This process derives generalizable guidance knowledge. Furthermore, this agent introduces Memory-augmented Inference to dynamically navigate solution paths, detect and repair errors, and adaptively switch reasoning paths with structured knowledge. The experiments across seven optimization benchmarks demonstrate that DCM-Agent achieves an average performance improvement of 11%- 21%. Notably, our analysis reveals a “knowledge inheritance” phenomenon: memory constructed by larger models can guide smaller models toward superior performance, highlighting the framework’s scalability and efficiency.

Abstract:
Using entropy as a measure of heterogeneity to guide optimization has emerged as a crucial research direction in Reinforcement Learning for LLMs. However, existing methods typically treat it as a discrete filter or post-hoc regulator rather than a core optimization driver. To fully leverage the potential of entropy and achieve fine-grained regulation, we introduce Heterogeneous Adaptive Policy Optimization (HAPO), a token-aware algorithm that continuously adapts optimization dynamics based on token-level entropy throughout the entire training process. Our algorithm includes four key components: (1) Adaptive Temperature Sampling that adjusts sampling temperature in real time, promoting exploration at high-entropy tokens. (2) Token-Level Group Average Advantage Estimation that estimates advantages at token level, accounting for sequence-length effects while preserving non-biased treatment.(3) Differential Advantage Redistribution that leverages entropy and importance ratios to adjust advantages for tokens with clear signals. (4) Asymmetric Adaptive Clipping that dynamically adjusts clipping boundaries based on token-level entropy. Through systematic investigation of entropy, we embed token-level treatment into every stage. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning, code, and logic tasks across multiple models demonstrate HAPO’s consistent superiority over DAPO.

Abstract:
Model Editing, also known as knowledge editing, is receiving increasing attention in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing model editing approaches predominantly focus on knowledge-level or static visual domains, overlooking dynamic semantics. This paper exploratively applies six representative model editing methods (FT, IKE, MEND, SERAC, MEMIT and AlphaEdit) to Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs) and introduces the first benchmark specifically designed for Vid-LLMs editing—VMEB (Vid-LLMs Model Editing Benchmark)—systematically extending model editing research from static modalities to dynamic video scenarios. We position this work as a forward-looking benchmark and a foundational diagnostic study: in the video paradigm, our evaluation dimensions encompass traditional metrics including Reliability, Locality, and Generality, while also introducing a video-specific metric: Robustness. Based on experimental results, we analyze the strengths and limitations of existing model editing approaches, and identify new challenges and research directions for the future development of the model editing field within the context of multimodal and video paradigms. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/Sakabamrisa/VMEB.

Abstract:
Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to Autoregressive Language Models, yet their inference strategies largely rely on prefix-based prompting inherited from the autoregressive paradigm. In this paper, we propose Template Infilling (TI), a conditioning methodology tailored for DLMs. Unlike conventional prefix prompting, TI distributes structural anchors across the target response, establishing a global template before infilling masked segments. This enables structured conditioning that leverages the bidirectional generation process of DLMs. We evaluate TI on diverse benchmarks, including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and trip planning, achieving consistent improvements of 9.40%p over baseline prompting strategies. Furthermore, TI naturally supports multi-token generation settings, providing practical speed advantages while maintaining generation quality and robustness. Overall, our results highlight a DLM-specific conditioning paradigm for structured generation, suggesting a promising direction for inference methods tailored to diffusion-based language models.

Abstract:
Vision-language model (VLM) based web agents demonstrate impressive autonomous GUI interaction but remain vulnerable to deceptive interface elements. Existing approaches either detect deception without task integration or document attacks without proposing defenses. We formalize deception-aware web agent defense and propose DUDE (Deceptive UI Detector Evaluator), a two-stage framework combining hybrid-reward learning with asymmetric penalties and experience summarization to distill failure patterns into transferable guidance. We introduce RUC (Real UI Clickboxes), a benchmark of 1,407 scenarios spanning four domains and deception categories. Experiments show DUDE reduces deception susceptibility by 53.8% while maintaining task performance, establishing an effective foundation for robust web agent deployment.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive proficiency in generating SQL queries, they fundamentally lack the capability to self-evaluate correctness without an execution oracle. This limitation creates a stark Generation-Selection Gap, where high potential accuracy (Pass@K) fails to translate into execution accuracy (Pass@1). Although supervised verifiers offer mitigation, they incur prohibitive annotation costs and suffer from domain fragility. Consequently, recent research has pivoted to the training-free setting. However, existing methods—such as Self-Consistency or LLM-as-a-Judge—remain hampered by systematic bias (consensus on hallucinations) and symbolic blindness (inability to simulate execution states). We introduce DPC (Dual-Paradigm Consistency), a multi-agent framework that reformulates SQL selection from a probabilistic guessing task on hidden data into a deterministic verification task on visible data. Specifically, DPC employs a Slicer and a Tester agent to collaboratively construct a Minimal Distinguishing Database (MDD)—an adversarial, fully observable micro-environment engineered to expose logical discrepancies between candidates. To break the self-correction bias, a Solver agent then verifies the SQL candidates by cross-referencing their execution against a parallel Python/Pandas solution. By validating execution consistency between declarative (SQL) and imperative (Python) paradigms, DPC robustly discriminates correct logic from systematic hallucinations. Experiments on BIRD and Spider across multiple LLMs demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms existing selection baselines, achieving absolute accuracy improvements of up to 2.2% over strong competitors like Self-Consistency.

Abstract:
Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) offer a promising alternative for language modeling by enabling parallel decoding through iterative refinement. However, most DLMs rely on hard binary masking and discrete token assignments, which hinder the revision of early decisions and underutilize intermediate probabilistic representations. In this paper, we propose EvoToken-DLM, a novel diffusion-based language modeling approach that replaces hard binary masks with evolving soft token distributions. EvoToken-DLM enables a progressive transition from masked states to discrete outputs, supporting revisable decoding. To effectively support this evolution, we introduce continuous trajectory supervision, which aligns training objectives with iterative probabilistic updates. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks show that EvoToken-DLM consistently achieves superior performance, outperforming strong diffusion-based and masked DLM baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/aim-uofa/EvoTokenDLM.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex interactive decision-making tasks.However, existing LLM agents typically rely on increasingly long interaction histories, resulting in high computational cost and limited scalability.In this paper, we propose STEP-HRL, a hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) framework that enables step-level learning by conditioning only on single-step transitions rather than full interaction histories.STEP-HRL structures tasks hierarchically, using completed subtasks to represent global progress of overall task. By introducing a local progress module, it also iteratively and selectively summarizes interaction history within each subtask to produce a compact summary of local progress.Together, these components yield augmented step-level transitions for both high-level and low-level policies.Experimental results on ScienceWorld and ALFWorld benchmarks consistently demonstrate that STEP-HRL substantially outperforms baselines in terms of performance and generalization while reducing token usage. Our code is available at https://github.com/TonyStark042/STEP-HRL.

Abstract:
Knowledge Graph-based Question Answering (KGQA) plays a pivotal role in complex reasoning tasks but remains constrained by two persistent challenges: the structural heterogeneity of Knowledge Graphs(KGs) often leads to semantic mismatch during retrieval, while existing reasoning path retrieval methods lack a global structural perspective. To address these issues, we propose Structure-Tracing Evidence Mining (STEM), a novel framework that reframes multi-hop reasoning as a schema-guided graph search task. First, we design a Semantic-to-Structural Projection pipeline that leverages KG structural priors to decompose queries into atomic relational assertions and construct an adaptive query schema graph. Subsequently, we execute globally-aware node anchoring and subgraph retrieval to obtain the final evidence reasoning graph from KG. To more effectively integrate global structural information during the graph construction process, we design a Triple-Dependent GNN (Triple-GNN) to generate a Global Guidance Subgraph (Guidance Graph) that guides the construction. STEM significantly improves both the accuracy and evidence completeness of multi-hop reasoning graph retrieval, and achieves State-of-the-Art performance on multiple multi-hop benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can extend their parameter knowledge limits by adopting the Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) paradigm. However, existing LLM-based agent training framework often focuses on answers’ accuracy, overlooking specific alignment for behavior patterns. Consequently, agent often exhibits ineffective actions during TIR tasks, such as redundant and insufficient tool calls. How to calibrate erroneous behavioral patterns when executing TIR tasks, thereby exploring effective trajectories, remains an open-ended problem. In this paper, we propose ET-Agent, a training framework for calibrating agent’s tool-use behavior through two synergistic perspectives: Self-evolving Data Flywheel and Behavior Calibration Training. Specifically, we introduce a self-evolutionary data flywheel to generate enhanced data, used to fine-tune LLM to improve its exploration ability. Based on this, we implement an two-phases behavior-calibration training framework. It is designed to progressively calibrate erroneous behavioral patterns to optimal behaviors. Further in-depth experiments confirm the superiority of ET-Agent across multiple dimensions, including correctness, efficiency, reasoning conciseness, and tool execution accuracy. Our ET-Agent framework provides practical insights for research in the TIR field. Codes can be found in https://github.com/RUC-NLPIR/ET-Agent

Abstract:
Safety alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) inherently presents a multi-objective optimization conflict, often accompanied by an unintended degradation of general capabilities. Existing mitigation strategies typically rely on global gradient geometry to resolve these conflicts, yet they overlook Modular Heterogeneity within Transformers, specifically that the functional sensitivity and degree of conflict vary substantially across different attention heads. Such global approaches impose uniform update rules across all parameters, often resulting in suboptimal trade-offs by indiscriminately updating utility sensitive heads that exhibit intense gradient conflicts. To address this limitation, we propose Conflict-Aware Sparse Tuning (CAST), a framework that integrates head-level diagnosis with sparse fine-tuning. CAST first constructs a pre-alignment conflict map by synthesizing Optimization Conflict and Functional Sensitivity, which then guides the selective update of parameters. Experiments reveal that alignment conflicts in LLMs are not uniformly distributed. We find that the drop in general capabilities mainly comes from updating a small group of “high-conflict” heads. By simply skipping these heads during training, we significantly reduce this loss without compromising safety, offering an interpretable and parameter-efficient approach to improving the safety-utility trade-off.

Abstract:
Despite substantial advances in large language models (LLMs), producing factually consistent responses for knowledge-intensive question answering remains challenging. These difficulties are primarily due to hallucination and the limitations of LLMs in bridging long-tail knowledge gaps. To address this, we propose AMATA, an Adaptive Multi-Agent Trajectory Alignment framework that dynamically integrates external knowledge to improve response interpretability and factual grounding. Our architecture leverages six specialized agents that collaboratively perform structured actions for complex question reasoning. We formalize multi-agent collaboration with external tools as a trajectory preference alignment problem, incorporating question-aware agent customization and inter-agent preference harmonization. AMATA introduces two principal innovations: (1) Intra-Trajectory Preference Learning, which learns objective-oriented preferences to prioritize critical agents, and (2) Inter-Agent Dependency Learning, which captures cross-agent tool dependencies through a novel dependency-aware direct preference optimization technique. Empirical results show that AMATA consistently outperforms baseline approaches, knowledge-augmented frameworks, and LLM-based trajectory systems on five established knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks. Further analysis demonstrates the efficiency of our method in reducing token consumption.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework for knowledge-intensive tasks, yet its effectiveness in long-context scenarios is often bottlenecked by the retriever’s inability to distinguish sparse yet crucial evidence. Standard retrievers, optimized for query-document similarity, frequently fail to align with the downstream goal of generating a precise answer. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel fine-tuning framework that optimizes the retriever for Answer Alignment. Specifically, we first identify high-quality positive chunks by evaluating their sufficiency to generate the correct answer. We then employ a curriculum-based contrastive learning scheme to fine-tune the retriever. This curriculum leverages LLM-constructed Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to generate augmented queries, which in turn mine progressively challenging hard negatives. This process trains the retriever to distinguish the answer-sufficient positive chunks from these nuanced distractors, enhancing its generalization. Extensive experiments on 10 datasets from the Ultradomain and LongBench benchmarks demonstrate that our fine-tuned retriever achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving 14.5% over the base model without substantial architectural modifications and maintaining strong efficiency for long-context RAG. Our work presents a robust and effective methodology for building truly answer-centric retrievers.

Abstract:
Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a key strategy for building agents that ”think then act”. However, recent observations, like OpenAI’s o3, suggest a paradox: stronger reasoning often coincides with increased hallucination, yet no prior work has systematically examined whether reasoning enhancement itself causes tool hallucination. We address this gap with the central question: Does strengthening reasoning increase tool hallucination? To answer this, we introduce SimpleToolHalluBench, a diagnostic benchmark measuring tool hallucination in two failure modes: (i) no tool available, and (ii) only distractor tools available. Through controlled experiments, we establish three key findings. First, we demonstrate a causal relationship: progressively enhancing reasoning through RL increases tool hallucination proportionally with task performance gains. Second, this effect transcends overfitting—training on non-tool tasks (e.g., mathematics) still amplifies subsequent tool hallucination. Third, the effect is method-agnostic, appearing when reasoning is instilled via supervised fine-tuning and when it is merely elicited at inference by switching from direct answers to step-by-step thinking. We also evaluate mitigation strategies including Prompt Engineering and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), revealing a fundamental reliability–capability trade-off: reducing hallucination consistently degrades utility. Mechanistically, Reasoning RL disproportionately collapses tool-reliability–related representations, and hallucinations surface as amplified divergences concentrated in late-layer residual streams. These findings reveal that current reasoning enhancement methods inherently amplify tool hallucination, highlighting the need for new training objectives that jointly optimize for capability and reliability. Our implementation is provided at https://github.com/albert-y1n/Reasoning_Trap.

Abstract:
Speech codecs provide an important interface between continuous speech signals and large language models. An ideal codec for speech language models should not only preserve acoustic information but also capture rich semantic information. However, existing codecs struggle to balance these objectives at low bitrates. We propose XY-Tokenizer , a low-bitrate speech codec (around 1 kbps) trained with a structured multi-stage, multi-task strategy that aligns discrete speech representations with text while preserving fine-grained acoustic details for reconstruction. This design explicitly mitigates the semantic–acoustic conflict observed in prior low-bitrate codecs. Experiments show that XY-Tokenizer achieves stronger semantic alignment than representative semantic-distillation codecs such as SpeechTokenizer and Mimi, while maintaining high-quality speech reconstruction across both clean and out-of-distribution conditions. Furthermore, XY-Tokenizer consistently outperforms existing low-bitrate codecs in LLM-based speech understanding and generation tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness as a general-purpose speech representation for speech–language modeling.

Abstract:
Continual pre-training on small-scale task-specific data is an effective method for improving large language models in new target fields, yet it risks catastrophic forgetting of their original capabilities. A common solution is to re-weight training data mixtures from source and target fields on a domain space to achieve balanced performance. Previous domain reweighting strategies rely on manual designation with certain heuristics based on human intuition or empirical results. In this work, we prove that more general heuristics can be parameterized by proposing Data Mixing Agent, the first model-based, end-to-end framework that learns to re-weight domains. The agent learns generalizable heuristics through reinforcement learning on large quantities of data mixing trajectories with corresponding feedback from an evaluation environment. Experiments in continual pre-training on math reasoning show that Data Mixing Agent outperforms strong baselines in achieving balanced performance across source and target field benchmarks. Furthermore, it generalizes well across unseen source fields, target models, and domain spaces without retraining. Direct application to the code generation field also indicates its adaptability across target domains. Further analysis showcases the agents’ well-aligned heuristics with human intuitions and their efficiency in achieving superior model performance with less source-field data.

Abstract:
Reward modeling is essential for aligning large language models with human preferences, yet predominant architectures rely on a static pooling strategy to condense sequences into scalar scores. This paradigm, however, suffers from two key limitations: a static inductive bias that misaligns with the task-dependent preference signals, and a representational mismatch, as the backbone’s optimization for generation leaves its representations ill-suited to fine-grained discrimination. To address this, we propose AdaJudge, a unified framework that jointly adapts representation and aggregation. AdaJudge first improves backbone representations into a discrimination-oriented space via gated refinement blocks. It then replaces the static readout with an adaptive multi-view pooling module, which dynamically routes and combines evidence. Extensive experiments on RM-Bench and JudgeBench show that AdaJudge outperforms strong off-the-shelf reward models and traditional pooling baselines.

Abstract:
LLM agents operating in open environments face escalating risks from indirect prompt injection, particularly within the tool stream where manipulated metadata and runtime feedback hijack execution flow. Existing defenses encounter a critical dilemma as advanced models prioritize injected rules due to strict alignment while static protection mechanisms sever the feedback loop required for adaptive reasoning. To reconcile this conflict, we propose VIGIL , a framework that shifts the paradigm from restrictive isolation to a verify-before-commit protocol. By facilitating speculative hypothesis generation and enforcing safety through intent-grounded verification, VIGIL preserves reasoning flexibility while ensuring robust control. We further introduce SIREN , a benchmark comprising 959 tool stream injection cases designed to simulate pervasive threats characterized by dynamic dependencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VIGIL outperforms state-of-the-art dynamic defenses by reducing the attack success rate by over 22% while more than doubling the utility under attack compared to static baselines, thereby achieving an optimal balance between security and utility. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Touring-686/vigil .

Abstract:
Early Long-context Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) methods struggle with preserving visual semantics or handling finite context windows. Conversely, recent RAG-based approaches suffer from "semantic gaps" and "structural disconnections" due to passive retrieval mechanisms that ignore logical dependencies. To address these challenges, we introduce TRACE (Traversal Retrieval-Augmented Chain of Evidence). By navigating a Bi-Layered Graph that encodes both physical adjacency and semantic relevance, TRACE transforms retrieval from static matching into adaptive evidence chain construction. Furthermore, we propose M5BookVQA, a benchmark designed to assess deep, multi-hop reasoning in books, addressing the limitations of existing datasets. Extensive experiments show that TRACE achieves an average accuracy improvement of 14.07% on M5BookVQA and exhibits robust generalization with a 13.38% gain across four established benchmarks. Our source code is available at https://github.com/shimurenhlq/TRACE.

Abstract:
Recent end-to-end spoken dialogue models enable natural interaction. However, as user demands become increasingly complex, models that rely solely on conversational abilities often struggle to cope. Incorporating agentic capabilities is therefore essential: by enabling tool use, these models can extend their knowledge boundaries and better solve real-world tasks. Yet, existing research has largely concentrated on core perception and generation, with comparatively limited exploration of such tool-augmented extensions. To bridge this gap, we present VoxMind, an integrated framework designed to equip end-to-end spoken dialogue models with comprehensive agentic abilities. Leveraging our curated 470-hour AgentChat dataset, we incorporate a "Think-before-Speak" mechanism, enabling the model to internalize structured reasoning as a critical prerequisite for planning and response generation. Furthermore, to mitigate latency bottlenecks caused by large-scale tool integration, we propose a Multi-Agent Dynamic Tool Management architecture. By asynchronously delegating retrieval tasks to an auxiliary agent aligned with the main model’s reasoning trajectory, this system effectively decouples inference latency from toolset size. Experimental results confirm that VoxMind achieves significant improvements in agent performance: compared with strong baselines, the task completion rate increases from 34.88% to 74.57%, outperforming Gemini-2.5-Pro on spoken agent tasks while preserving general conversational quality. The source code and associated data are publicly available at https://github.com/MM-Speech/VoxMind.

Abstract:
Graph-related tasks are traditionally addressed with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) or graph transformers, but their task-specific training limits generalization. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer stronger generalization, yet encoding graphs as one-dimensional text struggles to capture multi-hop dependencies and two-dimensional topology. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) provide an alternative by visualizing graphs, but rendering large graphs in a single image causes clutter, occlusion, and distraction, hindering reasoning. We propose MuSe, a novel multi-stage graph reasoning framework based on VLMs. Instead of processing entire graphs at once, MuSe incrementally samples and visualizes task-relevant subgraphs, enabling progressive reasoning. The framework employs a two-stage training paradigm: supervised fine-tuning to acquire local sampling and reasoning skills, followed by reinforcement learning with GRPO to refine the sampling strategy and control dialog length.To support evaluation, we introduce LGVLQA, a new multimodal dataset with larger and more complex graph structures, addressing the scalability limitations of existing benchmarks. Experiments show that MuSe consistently outperforms leading LLM and VLM baselines, demonstrating improved structural understanding and reasoning ability.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced knowledge graph question answering (KGQA), but current methods tend to rely on LLM-induced type systems with inconsistent granularity, or perform multi-hop reasoning without explicit target-type constraints. We introduce OntGQA, a type-constrained KGQA framework that reasons over a relation-centric ontology graph, where each relation is labeled with its head and tail entity types to provide a stable schema backbone. Built on this graph, OntGQA adopts a planner–judge architecture with generative backoff: a type planner proposes plausible head–tail type pairs, a judge verifies retrieved candidates and their paths, and a generator is invoked only when all candidates are rejected. By constraining both endpoints of reasoning in type space, OntGQA achieves state-of-the-art performance and produces ontology-grounded reasoning chains, with substantial Hit@1 gains (87.7%→91.5% on WebQSP and 67.6%→74.6% on CWQ).

Abstract:
Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has been widely used for automated reasoning data exploration, but current supervision extraction methods remain inefficient. Standard approaches retain only the single highest-reward trajectory, discarding the comparative signals present in the many explored paths. Here we introduce Contrastive Reasoning Path Synthesis (CRPS) , a framework that transforms supervision extraction from a filtering process into a synthesis procedure. CRPS uses a structured reflective process to analyze the differences between high- and low-quality search trajectories, extracting explicit information about strategic pivots and local failure modes. These insights guide the synthesis of reasoning chains that incorporate success patterns while avoiding identified pitfalls. We show empirically that models fine-tuned on just 60K CRPS-synthesized examples match or exceed the performance of baselines trained on 590K examples derived from standard rejection sampling, a 20 × reduction in dataset size. Furthermore, CRPS improves generalization on out-of-domain benchmarks, demonstrating that learning from the contrast between success and failure produces more transferable reasoning capabilities than learning from success alone.

Abstract:
Generating SVG-based fonts requires Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to translate high-level linguistic intent into low-level, topologically constrained symbolic sequences. However, current approaches struggle with two fundamental misalignments: the semantic ambiguity of unstructured natural language for precise geometric control, and the inefficiency of generic text tokenizers, which fragment coordinate-dense SVG XML into excessively long sequences with low information density. In this work, we propose Vector Calligrapher, a system that treats SVG generation as a conditional language modeling task optimized for both semantic grounding and representational efficiency.To bridge the semantic gap, we introduce a structured linguistic supervision Font Description Framework that decomposes typographic style into interpretable linguistic dimensions (e.g., historical lineage, affective metaphors), providing structured supervision aligned with the compositional syntax of SVG. To address the tokenization bottleneck, we design a scalable separated-coordinate strategy that bypasses the vocabulary explosion of flattened tokens while significantly compressing sequence length. Supported by VectorFont, a dataset of over 10 million hierarchically annotated glyphs, our approach improves CLIP score by +23%, reduces geometric error by ≈48%, and boosts generation efficiency by achieving an 18% Command-per-Token (C/T) ratio—a 6× increase in information density over standard baselines. These results demonstrate that combining structured linguistic supervision with efficient symbolic tokenization is essential for reliable, controllable vector graphics synthesis. VectorFont dataset, Code and model weights will be publicly released.

Abstract:
Estimating task progress requires long-horizon and dynamic reasoning, going beyond static visual perception. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at describing what is visible in a single observation, it remains unclear whether they can infer how far a task has progressed from partial information. To study this question, we introduce Progress-Bench, a benchmark with over 3K instances for evaluating progress reasoning from a single observation. We further examine a human-inspired two-stage paradigm that combines episodic retrieval with mental simulation. We instantiate this paradigm through both training-free prompting and a training-based approach using the automatically curated ProgressLM-45K dataset. Experiments on 14 VLMs show that most models struggle with reliable progress estimation, and that training-free reasoning provides only limited and model-dependent benefits. In contrast, the training-based ProgressLM-3B achieves consistent improvements in accuracy, robustness to viewpoint variation, and handling of unanswerable cases, despite its small scale. Additional analyses reveal common failure patterns in existing VLMs and clarify when and why progress reasoning succeeds or fails.

Abstract:
The development of LLM-based tutor agents faces challenges in simultaneously ensuring adherence to pedagogical principles and achieving optimal pedagogical effectiveness, particularly in dynamic, multi-turn interactions. Existing methods are often constrained by static data or sparse reward signals in online settings. To address this gap, we propose M ulti- H orizon P reference O ptimization ( MHPO ), a novel framework that iteratively refines tutor agents using a multi-horizon reward function within a dynamic teacher-student simulation environment. Specifically, this reward function is designed to capture both turn-level pedagogical quality and trajectory-level pedagogical effectiveness, which is estimated via Monte Carlo rollouts. We further investigate two distinct strategies to aggregate these rewards for policy optimization. Our experiments demonstrate that MHPO significantly enhances base model performance, achieving a superior balance between principles and effectiveness compared to various baselines.

Abstract:
Autonomous agents based on large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving to handle multi-turn tasks, but ensuring their trustworthiness remains a critical challenge. A fundamental pillar of this trustworthiness is calibration, which refers to an agent’s ability to express confidence that reliably reflects its actual performance. While calibration is well-established for static models, its dynamics in tool-integrated agentic workflows remain under-explored. In this work, we systematically investigate verbalized calibration in tool-use agents, revealing a fundamental confidence dichotomy driven by tool type. Specifically, our pilot study identifies that evidence tools (e.g., web search) systematically induce severe overconfidence due to inherent noise in retrieved information, while verification tools (e.g., code interpreters) can ground reasoning through deterministic feedback and mitigate miscalibration. To robustly improve calibration across tool types, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning framework that jointly optimizes task accuracy and calibration, supported by a holistic benchmark of reward designs. We demonstrate that our trained agents not only achieve superior calibration but also exhibit robust generalization from local training environments to noisy web settings and to distinct domains such as mathematical reasoning. Our results highlight the necessity of domain-specific calibration strategies for tool-use agents. More broadly, this work establishes a foundation for building self-aware agents that can reliably communicate uncertainty in high-stakes, real-world deployments.

Abstract:
Multilingual Large Language Models considerably changed how technologies influence language. While previous technologies could mediate or assist humans, there is now a tendency to offload the task of writing itself to these technologies, enabling models to change our languages more directly. While they provide us quick access to information and impressively fluent output, beneath their (apparent) sophistication lies a subtle, insidious threat: the gradual decline and loss of linguistic diversity. In this position paper, I explore how model collapse, with a particular focus on translation technology, can lead to the loss of linguistic forms, grammatical features, and cultural nuance. Model collapse refers to the consequences of self-consuming training loops, where automatically generated data (re-)enters the training data, leading to a gradual distortion of the data distribution and the underrepresentation of low-probability linguistic phenomena. Drawing on recent work in Computer Vision, Natural Language Processing and Machine Translation, I argue that the many tails of our linguistic distributions might be vanishing, and with them, the narratives and identities they carry. This paper is a call to resist linguistic flattening and to reimagine Natural Language Processing as a field that encourages, values and protects expressive multilingual diversity and creativity.

Abstract:
External memory systems are pivotal for enabling Large Language Model (LLM) agents to maintain persistent knowledge and perform long-horizon decision-making. Existing paradigms typically follow a two-stage process: computationally expensive memory construction (e.g., structuring data into graphs) followed by naive retrieval-augmented generation. However, our empirical analysis reveals two fundamental limitations: complex construction incurs high costs with marginal performance gains, and simple context concatenation fails to bridge the gap between retrieval recall and reasoning accuracy. To address above challenges, we propose CoM (Chain-of-Memory), a novel framework that advocates for a paradigm shift toward lightweight construction paired with sophisticated utilization. CoM introduces a Chain-of-Memory mechanism that organizes retrieved fragments into coherent inference paths through dynamic evolution, utilizing adaptive truncation to prune irrelevant noise. Extensive experiments on the LongMemEval and LoCoMo benchmarks demonstrate that CoM outperforms strong baselines with accuracy gains of 7.5%–10.4%, while drastically reducing computational overhead to approximately 2.7% of token consumption and 6.0% of latency compared to complex memory architectures.

Abstract:
Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) aims to remove harmful training data while preserving overall utility. However, we find that existing methods often hallucinate, generate abnormal token sequences, or behave inconsistently, raising safety and trust concerns. According to prior literature on LLM honesty, such behaviors are often associated with dishonesty. This motivates us to investigate the notion of honesty in the context of model unlearning. We propose a formal definition of unlearning honesty, which includes: (1) preserving both utility and honesty on retained knowledge, and (2) ensuring effective forgetting while encouraging the model to acknowledge its limitations and respond consistently to questions related to forgotten knowledge. To systematically evaluate the honesty of unlearning, we introduce a suite of metrics that cover utility, honesty on the retained set, effectiveness of forgetting, rejection rate and refusal stability in Q&A and MCQ settings. Evaluating 9 methods across 3 mainstream families shows that all current methods fail to meet these standards. After experimental and theoretical analyses, we present ReVa, a representation-alignment procedure that fine-tunes feature-randomized unlearned models to better acknowledge forgotten knowledge. On Q A tasks from the forget set, ReVa achieves the highest rejection rate after two rounds of interaction, nearly doubling the performance of the second-best method. Remarkably, It also improves honesty on the retained set.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face the "knowledge cutoff" challenge, where their frozen parametric memory prevents direct internalization of new information. While Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is commonly used to update model knowledge, it often updates factual content without reliably improving the model’s ability to use the newly incorporated information for question answering or decision-making. Reinforcement Learning (RL) is essential for acquiring reasoning skills; however, its high computational cost makes it impractical for efficient online adaptation. We empirically observe that the parameter updates induced by SFT and RL are nearly orthogonal. Based on this observation, we propose Parametric Skill Transfer (PaST), a framework that supports modular skill transfer for efficient and effective knowledge adaptation. By extracting a domain-agnostic Skill Vector from a source domain, we can linearly inject knowledge manipulation skills into a target model after it has undergone lightweight SFT on new data. Experiments on knowledge-incorporation QA (SQuAD, LooGLE) and agentic tool-use benchmarks (ToolBench) demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. On SQuAD, PaST outperforms the state-of-the-art self-editing SFT baseline by up to 9.9 points. PaST further scales to long-context QA on LooGLE with an 8.0-point absolute accuracy gain, and improves zero-shot ToolBench success rates by +10.3 points on average with consistent gains across tool categories, indicating strong scalability and cross-domain transferability of the Skill Vector.

Abstract:
While diffusion Multimodal Large Language Models (dMLLMs) have recently achieved remarkable strides in multimodal generation, the development of interpretability mechanisms has lagged behind their architectural evolution. Unlike traditional autoregressive models that produce sequential activations, diffusion-based architectures generate tokens via parallel denoising, resulting in smooth, distributed activation patterns across the entire sequence. Consequently, existing Class Activation Mapping (CAM) methods, which are tailored for local, sequential dependencies, are ill-suited for interpreting these non-autoregressive behaviors. To bridge this gap, we propose Diffusion-CAM, the first interpretability method specifically tailored for dMLLMs. We derive raw activation maps by differentiably probing intermediate representations in the transformer backbone, accordingly capturing both latent features and their class-specific gradients. To address the inherent stochasticity of these raw signals, we incorporate four key modules to resolve spatial ambiguity and mitigate intra-image confounders and redundant token correlations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Diffusion-CAM significantly outperforms SoTA methods in both localization accuracy and visual fidelity, establishing a new standard for understanding the parallel generation process of diffusion multimodal systems.

Abstract:
The widespread utilization of language models in modern applications is inconceivable without Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning techniques, such as low-rank adaptation ( LoRA ), which adds trainable adapters to selected layers. Although LoRA may obtain accurate solutions, it requires significant memory to train large models and intuition on which layers to add adapters. In this paper, we propose a novel method, WeightLoRA , which overcomes this issue by adaptive selection of the most critical LoRA heads throughout the optimization process. As a result, we can significantly reduce the number of trainable parameters while maintaining the capability to obtain consistent or even superior metric values. We conduct experiments for a series of competitive benchmarks and DeBERTa, BART, Llama and Qwen models, comparing our method with different adaptive approaches. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of WeightLoRA and the superior performance of WeightLoRA+ in almost all cases. The source code is available at https://github.com/brain-lab-research/WLoRA

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable general capabilities, yet they falter in domains requiring deep strategic reasoning. A primary obstacle is the need to navigate a game tree that grows exponentially with search depth, a task for which their generative nature is ill-suited. To address this, we introduce Generative Gamer (GenGamer), a framework that trains LLMs to reason like an expert player. Instead of attempting an exhaustive search, GenGamer learns to generate a compact, pruned reasoning trajectory termed as a Dynamic Deduction. This is achieved by integrating three key strategies: action pruning based on policy confidence, state pruning via value estimation, and branch pruning inspired by alpha-beta principles. Furthermore, to train the model effectively, we propose the Deduction Tree Reward (DTR), a process-oriented mechanism that provides step-by-step feedback on the quality of the reasoning process, rather than relying solely on the final game outcome. Experiments on complex games such as Tic-Tac-Toe and Leduc Poker demonstrate that GenGamer significantly enhances the strategic capabilities of LLMs, enabling them to achieve performance that surpasses current state-of-the-art language models.

Abstract:
Critique-guided reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training LLM agents by augmenting sparse outcome rewards with natural-language feedback. However, current methods often rely on static or offline critic models, which fail to adapt as the policy evolves. In on-policy RL, the agent’s trajectory distribution and error patterns shift over time, causing stationary critics to become stale and providing feedback of diminishing utility. To address this, we introduce ECHO (Evolving Critic for Hindsight-Guided Optimization), a framework that jointly optimizes the policy and critic through a synchronized co-evolutionary loop. ECHO utilizes a cascaded rollout mechanism where the critic generates multiple diagnoses for an initial trajectory, followed by policy refinement to enable group-structured advantage estimation. We address the challenge of learning plateaus via a saturation-aware gain shaping objective, which rewards the critic for inducing incremental improvements in high-performing trajectories. By employing synchronized dual-track GRPO updates, ECHO ensures the critic’s feedback stays synchronized with the evolving policy. Experimental results show that ECHO yields more stable training and higher long-horizon task success across open-world environments.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities through two complementary paradigms: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for knowledge grounding and Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for complex reasoning. However, existing attempts to unify these paradigms remain narrow in scope, typically limited to open-domain QA with fixed retrieval settings, which constrains generalization to broader domains. To address this limitation, we propose UR 2 (Unified RAG and Reasoning), a general reinforcement learning framework that dynamically coordinates retrieval and reasoning. UR 2 introduces two key designs: a difficulty-aware curriculum that selectively invokes retrieval only for challenging instances, and a hybrid knowledge access strategy that combines domain-specific offline corpora with on-the-fly LLM-generated summaries. Together, these components mitigate the imbalance between retrieval and reasoning and improve robustness to noisy information. Experiments on open-domain QA, MMLU-Pro, medical, and mathematical reasoning tasks show that UR 2 , built on Qwen-2.5-3/7B and LLaMA-3.1-8B, consistently outperforms existing RAG and RL baselines, and achieves performance comparable to GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4.1-mini on several benchmarks. We will release all code, models, and data.

Abstract:
The interaction between fringe subcultures and mainstream online communities poses significant challenges for understanding discourse on social media.In this work, we investigate whether users active in conspiracy-focused communities exhibit detectable linguistic signatures when participating in general-interest spaces, such as news, humor, or hobbyist forums.We analyze a large-scale longitudinal dataset of over 500 million comments spanning 10 years of Reddit activity, examining the communication patterns of these users across diverse social contexts independent of the topics they discuss.We show that these users exhibit distinctive linguistic patterns that enable machine learning models to reliably distinguish them from the general population within individual communities (averaging 87% accuracy across more than 20 binary classification tasks).Crucially, no single aggregate model captures these patterns across communities, as community-specific models outperform global classifiers by up to 17 percentage points.This result suggests that while these users are distinct, their linguistic expression is dynamic and highly responsive to the social norms of the environment they inhabit. Our findings suggest the need for tailored interventions in online spaces, as linguistic signals associated with conspiracy and fringe subcultures vary across communities and cannot be effectively addressed by uniform detection or moderation strategies.

Abstract:
We introduce Chart2Code, a new benchmark for evaluating the natural language to chart code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). Chart2Code is explicitly designed from a user-driven perspective, capturing diverse real-world scenarios and progressively increasing task difficulty. It consists of three levels: Level 1 (Chart Reproduction) reproduces charts from a reference figure and user query; Level 2 (Chart Editing) involves complex modifications such as changing chart types or adding elements; and Level 3 (Long-Table to Chart Generation) requires models to transform long, unprocessed tables into faithful charts following user instructions. To our knowledge, this is the first hierarchical benchmark that reflects practical chart2code usage while systematically scaling task complexity. In total, Chart2Code contains 2,186 tasks across 22 chart types, paired with multi-level evaluation metrics that assess both code correctness and the visual fidelity of rendered charts. We benchmark 29 state-of-the-art (SoTA) LMMs, including both proprietary and the latest open-source models such as GPT-5.2, Qwen3-VL, InternVL3/3.5, MiMo-VL, and Seed-1.6-VL. Experimental results demonstrate that even the SoTA model GPT-5.2 averages 72.21 on code-based evaluation and only 33.41 on chart-quality assessment across the editing tasks, underscoring the difficulty of Chart2Code. We anticipate this benchmark will drive advances in multimodal reasoning and foster the development of more robust and general-purpose LMMs.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into various domains, making knowledge editing techniques crucial yet potentially hazardous. Current editing methods primarily target atomic facts, overlooking the significant risks associated with manipulating “factual opinions”, e.g., documented stances of public figures on societal issues. Such manipulation could reshape public images, influence elections, and alter societal views. To systematically assess this threat, we introduce the Factual Opinion Editing with Evidence (FOE) benchmark, which encompasses 261 public figures, 19 issue categories, and 2,178 complete opinion records. Our evaluations demonstrate that current editing techniques struggle significantly with factual opinions, often achieving only superficial changes while failing to preserve consistency between the edited opinion and the supporting evidence generated by the model. To address this limitation, we further propose a simple yet effective Self-Generated Evidence-Aligned method that achieves opinion–evidence alignment without relying on explicit instructions. Together, our benchmark and method provide a foundation for understanding the emerging security implications of factual opinion editing in LLMs.

Abstract:
Output diversity is crucial for Large Language Models as it underpins pluralism and creativity.In this work, we reveal that controlling the language used during model thinking—the language of thought—provides a novel and structural source of output diversity.Our preliminary study shows that different thinking languages occupy distinct regions in a model’s thinking space.Based on this observation, we study two repeated sampling strategies under multilingual thinking—Single-Language Sampling and Mixed-Language Sampling—and conduct diversity evaluation on outputs that are controlled to be in English, regardless of the thinking language used.Across extensive experiments, we demonstrate that switching the thinking language from English to non-English languages consistently increases output diversity, with a clear and consistent positive correlation such that languages farther from English in the thinking space yield larger gains.We further show that aggregating samples across multiple thinking languages yields additional improvements through compositional effects, and that scaling sampling with linguistic heterogeneity expands the model’s diversity ceiling.Finally, we show that these findings translate into practical benefits in pluralistic alignment scenarios, leading to broader coverage of cultural knowledge and value orientations in LLM outputs. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/iNLP-Lab/Multilingual-LoT-Diversity.

Abstract:
Backchannels (e.g., ‘yeah’, ‘mhm’, and ‘right’) are short, non-interruptive feedback signals whose lexical form and prosody jointly convey pragmatic meaning. While prior computational research has largely focused on predicting backchannel timing, the relationship between lexico-prosodic form and meaning remains underexplored. We propose a two-stage framework: first, fine-tuning large language models on dialogue transcripts to derive rich contextual representations; and second, learning a joint embedding space for dialogue contexts and backchannel realizations. We evaluate alignment with human perception via triadic similarity judgments (prosodic and cross-lexical) and a context–backchannel suitability task. Our results demonstrate that the learned projections substantially improve context-backchannel retrieval compared to previous methods. In addition, they reveal that backchannel form is highly sensitive to extended conversational context and that the learned embeddings align more closely with human judgments than raw WavLM features.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly combine visual and textual information to perform complex tasks. However, conflicts between their internal knowledge and external visual input can lead to hallucinations and unreliable predictions. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms that VLMs use to resolve cross-modal conflicts by introducing WHOOPS-AHA!, a dataset of multimodal counterfactual queries that deliberately contradict internal commonsense knowledge. Through logit inspection, we identify a small set of attention heads that mediate this conflict. By intervening in these heads, we can steer the model towards its internal parametric knowledge or the visual information. Our results show that attention patterns on these heads effectively locate image regions that influence visual overrides, providing a more precise attribution compared to gradient-based methods.

Abstract:
Tool-Integrated Reasoning has emerged as a key paradigm to augment Large Language Models (LLMs) with computational capabilities, yet integrating tool-use into long Chain-of-Thought (long CoT) remains underexplored, largely due to the scarcity of training data and the challenge of integrating tool-use without compromising the model’s intrinsic long-chain reasoning. In this paper, we introduce DART (Discovery And Reinforcement of Tool-Integrated Reasoning Chains via Rollout Trees), a reinforcement learning framework that enables spontaneous tool-use during long CoT reasoning without additional human annotation. DART operates by constructing dynamic rollout trees during training to discover valid tool-use opportunities, branching out at promising positions to explore tool-integrated trajectories. Subsequently, a tree-based process advantage estimation identifies and credits specific sub-trajectories where tool invocation positively contributes to the solution, effectively reinforcing these beneficial behaviors during training. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmarks like AIME and GPQA-Diamond demonstrate that DART significantly outperforms existing methods, successfully harmonizing tool execution with long CoT reasoning.

Abstract:
Selecting a single high-quality output from multiple stochastic generations remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly in open-ended tasks where no canonical answer exists. While Best-of- N and self-consistency methods show that aggregating multiple generations can improve performance, existing approaches typically rely on external evaluators, reward models, or exact string-match voting, limiting their applicability and efficiency. We propose Mode Extraction (ModeX), an evaluator-free Best-of- N selection framework that generalizes majority voting to open-ended text generation by identifying the modal output representing the dominant semantic consensus among generated texts. ModeX constructs a similarity graph over candidate generations and recursively applies spectral clustering to select a representative centroid, without requiring additional inference or auxiliary models. We further instantiate this selection principle as ModeX Decoding, a drop-in decoding scheme with early pruning for efficiency. Across open-ended tasks—including text summarization, code generation, and mathematical reasoning—our approaches consistently outperform standard single- and multi-path baselines, providing a computationally efficient, drop-in solution for robust open-ended text generation.

Abstract:
In open-ended domains, teams must reconcile diverse viewpoints to produce strong deliverables. Answer aggregation approaches commonly used in closed domains are ill-suited to this setting, as they tend to suppress minority perspectives rather than resolve underlying disagreements. We present TeamFusion, a multi-agent system designed to support teamwork in open-ended domains by: 1. Instantiating a proxy agent for each team member conditioned on their expressed preferences; 2. Conducting a structured discussion to elicit agreements and disagreements; and 3. Synthesizing more consensus-oriented deliverables that feed into new iterations of discussion and synthesis. We evaluate TeamFusion on two teamwork tasks where team members can judge how well their individual views are represented in team decisions and how consensually good the final deliverables are, finding that it outperforms direct aggregation baselines across metrics, tasks, and team configurations.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge, but it must balance limited effective context, redundant retrieved evidence, and the loss of fine-grained facts under aggressive compression. Pure compression-based approaches reduce input size but often discard fine-grained details essential for factual accuracy. We propose SARA, a hybrid RAG framework that targets answer quality under fixed token budgets by combining natural-language snippets with semantic compression vectors. SARA retains a small set of passages in text form to preserve entities and numerical values, compresses the remaining evidence into interpretable vectors for broader coverage, and uses those vectors for iterative evidence reranking. Across 9 datasets and 5 open-source LLMs spanning 3 model families (Mistral, Llama, and Gemma), SARA consistently improves answer relevance (+17.71), answer correctness (+13.72), and semantic similarity (+15.53), demonstrating the importance of integrating textual and compressed representations for robust, context-efficient RAG.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed via third-party system prompts downloaded from public marketplaces. We identify a critical supply-chain vulnerability: conditional system prompt poisoning, where an adversary injects a sleeper agent into a benign-looking prompt. Unlike traditional jailbreaks that aim for broad refusal-breaking, our proposed framework, PARASITE, optimizes system prompts to trigger LLMs to output targeted, compromised responses only for specific queries (e.g., “Who should I vote for the US President?”) while maintaining high utility on benign inputs. Operating in a strict black-box setting without model weight access, PARASITE utilizes a two-stage optimization including a global semantic search followed by a greedy lexical refinement. Tested on open-source models and commercial APIs (GPT-4o-mini, GPT-3.5), PARASITE achieves up to 70% F1 reduction on targeted queries with minimal degradation to general capabilities. We further demonstrate that these poisoned prompts evade standard defenses, including perplexity filters and typo-correction, by exploiting the natural noise found in real-world system prompts.

Abstract:
When people query Vision-Language Models (VLMs) but cannot see the accompanying visual context (e.g. for blind and low-vision users), augmenting VLM predictions with natural language explanations can signal which model predictions are reliable. However, prior work has found that explanations can easily convince users that inaccurate VLM predictions are correct. To remedy undesirable overreliance on VLM predictions, we propose evaluating two complementary qualities of VLM-generated explanations via two quality scoring functions. We propose Visual Fidelity, which captures how faithful an explanation is to the visual context, and Contrastiveness, which captures how well the explanation identifies visual details that distinguish the model’s prediction from plausible alternatives. On the A-OKVQA, VizWiz, and MMMU-Pro tasks, these quality scoring functions are better calibrated with model correctness than existing explanation qualities. We conduct a user study in which participants have to decide whether a VLM prediction is accurate without viewing its visual context. We observe that showing our quality scores alongside VLM explanations improves participants’ accuracy at predicting VLM correctness by 11.1%, including a 15.4% reduction in the rate of falsely believing incorrect predictions. These findings highlight the utility of explanation quality scores in fostering appropriate reliance on VLM predictions.

Abstract:
Despite recent progress in context compression, we identify a fundamental memorization-utilization gap where models can compress context with near-perfect fidelity yet fail to effectively utilize these compressed representations for downstream tasks. We address this with a holistic training paradigm spanning pretraining, instruction tuning, and reinforcement learning, built upon an average pooling compression. Our key innovation uses outcome-based RL to enable implicit expansion: the model learns to adaptively unfold task-relevant details during generation, interleaving reconstruction with reasoning. We achieve near-lossless 16x context compression (≈5.3x decoder sequence-length reduction in our current implementation) across 7B and 32B models, recovering over 98% of full-context QA performance and outperforming prior methods by 11 points. Our 32B model demonstrates strong out-of-distribution and length generalization, robustly scaling to 120k-token contexts despite training on no more than 4k tokens, matching full-context performance on NIAH, LongBench v2, and multi-hop reasoning. We verify the implicit expansion behavior in experiments.

Abstract:
Motion sensor time-series are central to Human Activity Recognition (HAR), yet conventional approaches are constrained to fixed activity sets and typically require costly parameter retraining to adapt to new behaviors. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising open-set reasoning capabilities, applying them directly to numerical time-series often leads to hallucinations and weak grounding. To address this challenge, we propose ZARA (Zero-training Activity Reasoning Agents), a knowledge- and retrieval-augmented agentic framework for motion time-series reasoning in a training-free inference setting. Rather than relying on black-box projections, ZARA distills reference data into a statistically grounded textual knowledge base that transforms implicit signal patterns into verifiable natural-language priors. Guided by retrieved evidence, ZARA iteratively selects discriminative cues and performs grounded reasoning over candidate activities. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks show that ZARA generalizes robustly to unseen subjects and across datasets, demonstrating strong transferability across heterogeneous sensor domains. These results mark a step toward trustworthy, plug-and-play motion understanding beyond dataset-specific artifacts. Our code is available at https://github.com/zechenli03/ZARA.

Abstract:
Emotion is a central dimension of spoken communication, yet, we still lack a mechanistic account of how modern large audio-language models (LALMs) encode it internally. We present the first neuron-level interpretability study of emotion-sensitive neurons (ESNs) in LALMs and provide causal evidence supporting the existence of such units in Qwen2.5-Omni, Kimi-Audio, and Audio Flamingo 3. Across these three widely used open-source models, we compare frequency-, entropy-, mean-deviation-, and contrast-based neuron selectors on multiple emotion recognition benchmarks. Using inference-time interventions, we reveal a consistent emotion-specific signature: deactivating neurons selected for a given emotion disproportionately degrades recognition of that emotion while largely preserving other classes, whereas targeted steering amplifies these units to bias predictions toward the target emotion. These effects arise with modest amounts of identification data and scale systematically with intervention strength. We further observe that ESNs exhibit non-uniform layer-wise clustering with partial cross-dataset transfer. Taken together, our results offer a causal, neuron-level account of emotion decisions in LALMs and highlight targeted neuron interventions as an actionable handle for controllable affective behaviors.

Abstract:
The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) documents suicides in the United States. In a demanding public health data pipeline, annotators manually extract structured information from death investigation records following extensive codebooks (i.e. annotation guidelines) painstakingly developed by experts. In this work, we facilitate data-driven insights from the NVDRS data to support the development of novel suicide interventions by leveraging language models (LM) as assistants to these (a) data annotators and (b) experts. We find that LM predictions match existing data annotations about 85% of the time across 50 NVDRS variables. Where the LM disagrees with existing annotations, our expert review identifies that 38% of these instances reveal inconsistencies between narratives and structured data. Finally, we introduce a human-in-the-loop algorithm that helps experts efficiently build and refine codebooks for new variables by having them only focus on providing feedback for incorrect LM predictions. We apply our algorithm to a real-world case study, and find that about 96K narratives contain evidence of victim interactions with legal professionals, which surfaces a substantial opportunity for upstream intervention that is not captured in the original structured data. Our findings provide evidence that LMs can serve as effective assistants to public health researchers who handle sensitive data in high-stakes scenarios.

Abstract:
The quadratic computational cost of traditional attention mechanisms poses a major bottleneck to the scalability and practical deployment of large language models (LLMs), particularly in long-context scenarios. To improve efficiency, existing approaches often enforce rigid structural constraints such as local attention windows. However, these strategies typically lead to substantial performance degradation on tasks requiring precise long-range recall. In this work, we propose MATCH, a scalable and efficient framework that augments sparsified attention mechanisms with dynamically integrated in-context information through an efficient retrieval system. Empirical results show that MATCH significantly improves the performance of sparse-attention models on both synthetic and real-world natural-language tasks. These findings highlight the versatility of MATCH as a general approach for enhancing in-context retrieval capabilities while maintaining the efficiency benefits of sparse attention architectures.

Abstract:
Audio Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in the real world, where they inevitably capture speech from unintended nearby bystanders, raising privacy risks that existing benchmarks and defences did not consider. We introduce SH-Bench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate selective hearing: a model’s ability to attend to an intended main speaker while refusing to process or reveal information about incidental bystander speech. SH-Bench contains 3,968 multi-speaker audio mixtures, including both real-world and synthetic scenarios, paired with 77k multiple-choice questions that probe models under general and selective operating modes. In addition, we propose Selective Efficacy (SE), a novel metric capturing both multi-speaker comprehension and bystander-privacy protection. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary LLMs reveals substantial bystander privacy leakage, with strong audio understanding failing to translate into selective protection of bystander privacy. To mitigate this gap, we also present Bystander Privacy Fine-Tuning (BPFT), a novel training pipeline that teaches models to refuse bystander-related queries without degrading main-speaker comprehension. We show that BPFT yields substantial gains, achieving an absolute 47% higher bystander accuracy under selective mode and an absolute 16% higher SE compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is the best audio LLM without BPFT. Together, SH-Bench and BPFT provide the first systematic framework for measuring and improving bystander privacy in audio LLMs.

Abstract:
Verbal multiword expressions (VMWEs) remain difficult for machine translation because their meanings are often not recoverable from their component words. In this study, we analyze the impact of three VMWE categories—verbal idioms, verb-particle constructions, and light verb constructions—on machine translation quality from English to multiple languages. Using both established multiword expression datasets and standard machine translation datasets, we evaluate how state-of-the-art translation systems handle these expressions. Our experimental results consistently show that VMWEs negatively affect translation quality, with deeper analysis indicating that this degradation is primarily attributable to the VMWE itself rather than general sentence-level difficulty. We release our code and evaluation framework to test new MT systems for the community.

Abstract:
Metonymy and metaphor often co-occur in natural language, yet computational work has studied them largely in isolation. We introduce a framework that transforms a literal sentence into three figurative variants: metonymic, metaphoric, and hybrid. Using this framework, we construct MetFuse, the first dedicated dataset of figurative fusion between metonymy and metaphor, containing 1,000 human-verified meaning-aligned quadruplets totaling 4,000 sentences. Extrinsic experiments on eight existing benchmarks show that augmenting training data with MetFuse consistently improves both metonymy and metaphor classification, with hybrid examples yielding the largest gains on metonymy tasks. Using this dataset, we also analyze how the presence of one figurative type impacts another. Our findings show that both human annotators and large language models better identify metonymy in hybrid sentences than in metonymy-only sentences, demonstrating that the presence of a metaphor makes a metonymic noun more explicit.

Abstract:
Web agents struggle to adapt to new websites due to the scarcity of environment specific tasks and demonstrations. Recent works have explored synthetic data generation to address this challenge, however, they suffer from data quality issues where synthesized tasks contain hallucinations that cannot be executed, and collected trajectories are noisy with redundant or misaligned actions. In this paper, we propose SynthAgent, a fully synthetic supervision framework that aims at improving synthetic data quality via dual refinement of both tasks and trajectories. Our approach begins by synthesizing diverse tasks through categorized exploration of web elements, ensuring efficient coverage of the target environment. During trajectory collection, tasks are refined only when conflicts with observations are detected, which mitigates hallucinations while preserving task consistency. After collection, we conduct trajectory refinement with global context to mitigate potential noise or misalignments. Finally, we fine-tune open-source web agents on the refined synthetic data to adapt them to the target environment. Experimental results demonstrate that SynthAgent outperforms existing synthetic data methods, validating the importance of high-quality synthetic supervision. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/SynthAgent.

Abstract:
Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) systems construct knowledge graphs over document collections to support multi-hop reasoning. While prior work shows that GraphRAG responses may leak retrieved subgraphs, the feasibility of query-efficient reconstruction of the hidden graph structure remains unexplored under realistic query budgets. We study a budget-constrained black-box setting where an adversary adaptively queries the system to steal its latent entity–relation graph. We propose AGEA (Agentic Graph Extraction Attack), a framework that leverages a novelty-guided exploration–exploitation strategy, external graph memory modules, and a two-stage graph extraction pipeline combining lightweight discovery with LLM-based filtering. We evaluate AGEA on medical, agriculture, and literary datasets across Microsoft-GraphRAG and LightRAG systems. Under identical query budgets, AGEA significantly outperforms prior attack baselines, recovering up to 90% of entities and relationships while maintaining high precision. These results demonstrate that modern GraphRAG systems are highly vulnerable to structured, agentic extraction attacks, even under strict query limits. The code is available at https://github.com/shuashua0608/AGEA.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in multilingual, real-world applications with user inputs – naturally introducing typographical errors (typos). Yet most benchmarks assume clean input, leaving the robustness of LLMs to typos across languages largely underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MulTypo, a multilingual typo generation algorithm that simulates human-like errors based on language-specific keyboard layouts and typing behavior. We evaluate 18 open-source LLMs across three model families and five downstream tasks spanning language inference, multi-choice question answering, mathematical reasoning, and machine translation tasks. Our results show that typos consistently degrade performance, particularly in generative tasks and those requiring reasoning – while the natural language inference task is comparatively more robust. Instruction tuning improves clean-input performance but may increase brittleness under noise. We also observe language-dependent robustness: high-resource languages are generally more robust than low-resource ones, and translation from English is more robust than translation into English. Our findings underscore the need for noise-aware training and multilingual robustness evaluation. We release a Python package for MulTypo and make the source code publicly available at https://github.com/cisnlp/multypo .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across diverse coding tasks. However, their adoption requires a true understanding of program execution rather than relying on surface-level patterns. Existing benchmarks primarily focus on predicting program properties tied to specific inputs (e.g., code coverage, program outputs). As a result, they provide a narrow view of dynamic code reasoning and are prone to data contamination. We argue that understanding program execution requires evaluating its inherent duality through two complementary reasoning tasks: (i) predicting a program’s observed behavior for a given input, and (ii) inferring how the input must be mutated toward a specific behavioral objective. Both tasks jointly probe a model’s causal understanding of execution flow. We instantiate this duality in DexBench, a benchmark comprising 445 paired instances, and evaluate 13 LLMs. Our results demonstrate that dual-path reasoning provides a robust and discriminative proxy for dynamic code understanding.

Abstract:
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) for large language models (LLMs) is a key building block for safety guardrails of daily LLM applications. Yet, even as LLM agents are increasingly deployed in highly complex tasks, most UQ research still centers on single-turn question-answering. We argue that UQ research must shift to realistic settings with interactive agents, and that a new principled framework for agent UQ is needed. This paper presents three pillars to build a solid ground for future agent UQ research: (1. Foundations) We present the first general formulation of agent UQ that subsumes broad classes of existing UQ setups; (2. Challenges) We identify four technical challenges specifically tied to agentic setups—selection of uncertainty estimator, uncertainty of heterogeneous entities, modeling uncertainty dynamics in interactive systems, and lack of fine-grained benchmarks—with numerical analysis on a real-world agent benchmark, 𝜏 2 -bench; (3. Future Directions) We conclude with noting on the practical implications of agent UQ and remaining open problems as forward-looking discussion for future explorations.

Abstract:
Test-Time Scaling (TTS) methods for enhancing Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning often incur substantial inference costs, due to reliance on long chain-of-thought (CoT) generation, self-consistency sampling methods, or searching under Process Reward Models (PRMs). This paper introduces Guided by Gut (GG), an efficient self-guided TTS framework that enables LLMs to perform step-by-step reasoning at a low cost, without any reward models or verifiers. GG performs a lightweight tree search guided solely by intrinsic confidence signals of the LLM at each reasoning step and improves the reliability of such internal confidence signals by reinforcement learning. Empirical evaluations on challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that GG enables smaller models (e.g., 1.5B-7B parameters) to achieve accuracy matching or surpassing significantly larger models (e.g., 32B–70B parameters), while reducing GPU memory usage by up to 10×. Compared to TTS with PRMs, GG achieves comparable accuracy with 8× faster inference speeds and 4–5× lower memory usage. Additionally, GG reduces KV cache memory usage by approximately 50% compared to Best-of-N sampling, facilitating more efficient and practical deployment of TTS techniques.

Abstract:
Guideline-following is increasingly important in compliance, customer support, and other regulated workflows, where correctness is defined by explicit rule systems rather than heuristics. Learning to follow guidelines is challenging because guidelines are interdependent: rules can trigger, suppress, or conflict with one another, while locally plausible responses may violate global constraints. Most existing methods treat guidelines as static text and rely on implicit reasoning or deeper decoding, making rule interactions and satisfaction status hard to observe and control. A more feasible approach is to model guideline execution with an explicit state that tracks evolving rule evidence across steps. However, conventional world models are a poor fit: they typically assume privileged feedback or well-defined transition dynamics, assumptions that do not hold when reasoning occurs purely in language space under ambiguous, text-defined constraints. As a solution, we propose RGCWM, a Rule-Grounded Causal World Model that builds an explicit state space from the guideline text itself. RGCWM represents rule applicability and satisfaction as a continuously updated evidence state, externalizes inter-rule dependencies as a causal structure, and plans at inference time by counterfactually evaluating candidate responses under model-estimated state transitions. Experiments show that this shift from implicit text reasoning to state-based reasoning enables stable, controllable execution of complex interacting rules across diverse domains.

Abstract:
Table annotation is crucial for making web and enterprise tables usable in downstream NLP applications. Unlike textual data where learning semantically rich token or sentence embeddings often suffice, tables are structured combinations of columns wherein useful representations must jointly capture column’s semantics and the inter-column relationships. Existing models learn by linearizing the 2D table into a 1D token sequence and encoding it with pretrained language models (PLMs) such as BERT. However, this leads to limited semantic quality and weaker generalization to unseen or rare values compared to modern LLMs, and degraded structural modeling due to 2D-to-1D flattening and context-length constraints. We propose TabEmb, which directly targets these limitations by decoupling semantic encoding from structural modeling. An LLM first produces semantically rich embeddings for each column, and a graph-based module over columns then injects relationships into the embeddings, yielding joint semantic–structural representations for table annotation. Experiments show that TabEmb consistently outperforms strong baselines on different table annotation tasks. Source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/hoseinzadeehsan/TabEmb

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in natural language processing by encoding extensive knowledge, but their utility relies on timely updates as human knowledge keeps evolving. In this paper, we investigate the problem of LLM knowledge updates, which requires simultaneously unlearning unwanted information and learning new knowledge. Existing approaches that tackle unlearning and learning separately encounter task conflicts and knowledge management issues when applied to comprehensive knowledge updates.In this paper, we validate our findings with theoretical analysis and empirical evidence, and propose LOKA, a conflict-aware framework for Large language mOdel Knowledge updAtes. During training, LOKA introduces an adaptive knowledge memory approach in which updated knowledge is allocated across multiple memory units. During inference, LOKA retrieves the most relevant memory unit from the knowledge memory and integrates it with the original LLM to apply updated knowledge, while a learning-based router controls the activation of the knowledge memory to improve knowledge utilization. Extensive experiments demonstrate the efficacy of LOKA in achieving accurate, flexible, and conflict-aware knowledge updates.

Abstract:
Translationese refers to the statistical patterns that distinguish translated texts from original texts, which are often subtle and imperceptible to human readers. When translated texts appear in either training or testing data, these patterns can negatively affect model performance or warp model evaluation. We approach the task of discerning whether a text was originally written in English or translated into English by fine-tuning contemporary foundation models at distinct item lengths and achieve state-of-the-art performance (94% Macro F1). Given that these linguistic cues are subtle and often imperceptible to humans, we analyze the features which enable our model’s high performance. Employing a suite of interpretability-based techniques, we find that: (1) our high accuracy is enabled by a collection of linguistic features, a number of which correspond with linguistic theories of translationese, and (2) pretrained neural models are adept at picking up these features without any fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Nearly all human work is collaborative; thus, the evaluation of real-world NLP applications often requires multiple dimensions that align with diverse human perspectives. As real human evaluator resources are often scarce and costly, the emerging "LLM-as-a-judge" paradigm sheds light on a promising approach to leverage LLM agents to believably simulate human evaluators. Yet, to date, existing LLM-as-a-judge approaches face two limitations: persona descriptions of agents are often arbitrarily designed, and the frameworks are not generalizable to other tasks. To address these challenges, we propose MAJ-EVAL, a Multi-Agent-as-Judge evaluation framework that can automatically construct multiple evaluator personas with distinct dimensions from relevant text documents (e.g., research papers), instantiate LLM agents with the personas, and engage in-group debates with multi-agents to generate multi-dimensional feedback. Our evaluation experiments in both the educational and medical domains demonstrate that MAJ-EVAL can generate evaluation results that better align with human experts’ ratings compared with conventional automated evaluation metrics and existing LLM-as-a-judge methods.

Abstract:
Softmax attention struggles with long contexts due to structural limitations: the strict sum-to-one constraint forces attention sinks on irrelevant tokens, while probability mass disperses as sequence lengths increase. We tackle these problems with Threshold Differential Attention (TDA), a sink-free attention mechanism that achieves ultra-sparsity and improved robustness at longer sequence lengths without the computational overhead of projection methods or the performance degradation caused by noise accumulation of standard rectified attention. TDA applies row-wise extreme-value thresholding with a length-dependent gate, retaining only exceedances. Inspired by the differential transformer, TDA also subtracts an inhibitory view to enhance expressivity. Theoretically, we prove that TDA controls the expected number of spurious survivors per row to O(1) and that consensus spurious matches across independent views vanish as context grows. Empirically, TDA produces >99 % exact zeros and eliminates attention sinks while maintaining competitive performance on standard and long-context benchmarks.

Abstract:
Phone recognition (PR) serves as the atomic interface for language-agnostic modeling for cross-lingual speech processing and phonetic analysis. Despite prolonged efforts in developing PR systems, current evaluations only measure surface-level transcription accuracy. We introduce PRiSM, the first open-source benchmark designed to expose blind spots in phonetic perception through intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation of PR systems. PRiSM standardizes transcription-based evaluation and assesses downstream utility in clinical, educational, and multilingual settings with transcription and representation probes. We find that diverse language exposure during training is key to PR performance, encoder-CTC models are the most stable, and specialized PR systems still outperform LALMs. PRiSM releases code, recipes, and datasets to move the field toward multilingual speech models with robust phonetic ability.

Abstract:
Existing long-document question answering systems typically process texts as flat sequences or use heuristic chunking, which overlook the discourse structures that naturally guide human comprehension. We present a discourse-aware hierarchical framework that leverages rhetorical structure theory (RST) for long document question answering. Our approach converts discourse trees into sentence-level representations and employs LLM-enhanced node representations to bridge structural and semantic information. The framework involves three key innovations: language-universal discourse parsing for lengthy documents, LLM-based enhancement of discourse relation nodes, and structure-guided hierarchical retrieval. Extensive experiments on four datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over existing approaches through the incorporation of discourse structure, across multiple genres and languages. Moreover, the proposed framework exhibits strong robustness across diverse document types and linguistic settings.

Abstract:
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) must balance effectiveness and efficiency: low-rank methods can be costly, while global representation edits often underfit token-level contexts. We propose Token-Aware Representation Editing (TARE), a PEFT method that performs fine-grained, token-specific edits with a small additional inference overhead and minimal tuning.After each FFN block in a transformer-like model, we adopt a lightweight selector that scores a small pool of hidden representation editors for each token, activates only the top-k editors, and mixes their element-wise scaling/bias updates. This design achieves superior performance while maintaining computational efficiency, yielding a more favorable Pareto frontier compared to state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.Across LLaMA-3-8B (eight knowledge reasoning and seven mathematical reasoning tasks) and RoBERTa-base/large (GLUE), TARE outperforms SOTAs (LoRA, DoRA, MiLoRA, LoReFT, and RED), achieving 86.7% (knowledge reasoning), 76.7% (mathematical reasoning), and 88.3% (GLUE) while tuning only 0.0392% of parameters using about 20 GiB peak GPU memory during training.An implementation is available at: .

Abstract:
In this paper, we observe that current models are susceptible to reward hacking, leading to a substantial overestimation of a model’s reasoning ability. This is evidenced by a high incidence of “false positives”—solutions that reach the correct answer through an unsound process.Through a systematic analysis with human verification, we establish a taxonomy of these failure modes, identifying patterns like Miracle Steps—abrupt jumps to a correct output without a valid preceding derivation. Probing experiments suggest that these Miracle Steps are linked to answer-recall shortcuts, including memorization from pretraining, where the model accesses the correct answer independently of its reasoning chain.To mitigate this systemic issue, we introduce the Rubric Reward Model (RRM), a process-oriented reward function that evaluates the entire reasoning trajectory against problem-specific rubrics.The RRM explicitly penalizes logical flaws and encourages rigorous deduction.When integrated into an RL pipeline, RRM-based training consistently outperforms outcome-only supervision across four math benchmarks.Notably, it boosts Verified Pass@1024 on AIME2024 from 26.7% to 62.6% and reduces the incidence of Miracle Steps by 71%.Our work demonstrates that rewarding the solution process is crucial for building accurate and reliable models.

Abstract:
While recent self-training approaches have reduced reliance on human-labeled data for aligning LLMs, they still face critical limitations: (i) sensitivity to synthetic data quality, leading to instability and bias amplification in iterative training; (ii) ineffective optimization due to a diminishing gap between positive and negative responses over successive training iterations. In this paper, we propose Team-based self-Play with dual Adaptive Weighting (TPAW), a novel self-play algorithm designed to improve alignment in a fully self-supervised setting. TPAW adopts a team-based framework in which the current policy model both collaborates with and competes against historical checkpoints, promoting more stable and efficient optimization. To further enhance learning, we design two adaptive weighting mechanisms: (i) a response reweighting scheme that adjusts the importance of target responses, and (ii) a player weighting strategy that dynamically modulates each team member’s contribution during training. Initialized from a SFT model, TPAW iteratively refines alignment without requiring additional human supervision. Experimental results demonstrate that TPAW consistently outperforms existing baselines across various base models and LLM benchmarks.

Abstract:
Dense retrieval represents queries and documents as high-dimensional embeddings, but these representations can be redundant at the query level: for a given information need, only a subset of dimensions is consistently helpful for ranking. Prior work addresses this via pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) based dimension importance estimation, which can produce query-aware masks without labeled data but often relies on noisy pseudo signals and heuristic test-time procedures. In contrast, supervised adapter methods leverage relevance labels to improve embedding quality, yet they learn global transformations shared across queries and do not explicitly model query-aware dimension importance. We propose a Query-Aware Adaptive Dimension Selection framework that learns to predict per-dimension importance directly from query embedding. We first construct oracle dimension importance distributions over embedding dimensions using supervised relevance labels, and then train a predictor to map a query embedding to these label-distilled importance scores. At inference, the predictor selects a query-aware subset of dimensions for similarity computation based solely on the query embedding, without pseudo-relevance feedback. Experiments across multiple dense retrievers and benchmarks show that our learned dimension selector improves retrieval effectiveness over the full-dimensional baseline as well as PRF-based masking and supervised adapter baselines.

Abstract:
Web agents, which couple language models with browsing and tool-use capabilities, show promise as open web assistants. Yet progress is increasingly limited by the lack of scalable, process-level supervision. Existing benchmarks are largely manually constructed , providing only coarse start–goal annotations without intermediate trajectories, while recent automatic generation efforts remain expensive, biased, and shallow. These limitations prevent reliable training and evaluation of agents that must generalize to realistic, multi-hop, cross-page tasks. We introduce a scalable framework GTA that integrates crawling, retrieval-based seeding, in-context generation, and automated quality control to produce realistic tasks paired with executable trajectories. This design decouples crawling from generation for greater efficiency, grounds tasks in the site graph to enforce compositionality, and ensures dense supervision through deterministic replays and systematic validation. We instantiate the pipeline on over 50 websites covering e-commerce, government, forums, and news, with multilingual and multi-hop coverage. The resulting benchmark reveals a significant human–agent performance gap and enables detailed diagnostics. Our contributions are three-fold: (i) formalizing multi-hop web-agent task generation, (ii) proposing an efficient and validated pipeline for automatic data creation, and (iii) releasing a dynamic benchmark with reproducible evaluation.

Abstract:
Although Speech Large Language Models have achieved notable progress, a substantial modality reasoning gap remains: their reasoning performance on speech inputs is markedly weaker than on text. This gap could be associated with representational drift across Transformer layers and behavior deviations in long-chain reasoning. To address this issue, we introduce TARS, a reinforcement-learning framework that aligns text-conditioned and speech-conditioned trajectories through an asymmetric reward design. The framework employs two dense and complementary signals: representation alignment, which measures layer-wise hidden-state similarity between speech- and text-conditioned trajectories, and behavior alignment, which evaluates semantic consistency between generated outputs and reference text completions. Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks, including MMSU and OBQA, show that our approach significantly narrows the modality reasoning gap and achieves state-of-the-art performance among 7B-scale Speech LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language models produce powerful text embeddings, but their causal attention mechanism restricts the flow of information from later to earlier tokens, degrading representation quality. While recent methods attempt to solve this by prepending a single summary token, they over-compress information, hence harming performance on long documents. We propose Hierarchical Token Prepending (HTP), a method that resolves two critical bottlenecks. To mitigate attention-level compression, HTP partitions the input into blocks and prepends block-level summary tokens to subsequent blocks, creating multiple pathways for backward information flow. To address readout-level over-squashing, we replace last-token pooling with mean-pooling, a choice supported by theoretical analysis. HTP achieves consistent performance gains across 11 retrieval datasets and 30 general embedding benchmarks, especially in long-context settings. As a simple, architecture-agnostic method, HTP effectively enhances both zero-shot and fine-tuned models, offering a scalable route to superior long-document embeddings.

Abstract:
Document-level Event Causality Identification (DECI) aims to identify causal relations among multiple events within unstructured text. Existing methods predominantly rely on local semantic similarity for independent event-pair discrimination, thereby overlooking the influence of the overall narrative backbone in the propagation of causal dependencies and the role differentiation of events within multi-cause/multi-effect structures. Therefore, we propose a suggest-verify-revise approach for document-level Event Causality Identification with narrative consistency (SVRECI). In the suggest stage, we integrate multi-dimensional heuristic causal suggestions generated by an LLM with structural suggestions derived from hypergraph modeling to provide multi-source initial support for candidate event pairs. In the verify stage, we introduce a Topological Hawkes process to perform constrained verification of narrative propagation consistency among events. In the revise stage, we construct a dynamically evolving document-level causal graph and incorporate a structure-aware dual-level contrastive learning mechanism at both the event and event-pair levels, iteratively reducing noisy edges over multiple iterations. Experimental results on EventStoryLine and Causal-TimeBank datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms previous methods.

Abstract:
Patient–trial retrieval is a challenging problem that requires nuanced clinical reasoning beyond surface-level semantic similarity. However, scarce and costly relevance annotations force existing approaches to rely on very limited supervision or zero-shot transfer, reducing the task to generic semantic matching and failing to capture multi-factor eligibility reasoning. To this end, we propose FACTrial, a factorized contrastive training framework that leverages LLMs to synthesize diagnosis-aware supervision for scalable patient–trial retrieval. FACTrial decomposes each patient note into a primary diagnosis and a set of concomitant, eligibility-triggering conditions, and constructs complementary contrastive signals through structured trial augmentation. Specifically, we generate primary-target and concomitant-target positives, together with clinically confusable near-miss negatives, to enforce diagnostic specificity under contrastive learning. Two specialized bi-encoder experts are trained to balance primary-diagnosis prioritization and concomitant-driven recall, and fused into a single deployable retriever. Experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that FACTrial achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving both top-ranked quality and high-recall coverage.

Abstract:
Previous research on multi-party dialogue generation has predominantly leveraged structural information inherent in dialogues to directly inform the generation process. However, the prevalence of colloquial expressions and incomplete utterances in dialogues often impedes comprehension and weakens the fidelity of dialogue structure representations, which is particularly pronounced in multi-party dialogues. In this work, we propose a novel framework DRCR (Discourse coherence and Response-guided Context Rewriting) to improve multi-party dialogue generation through dialogue context rewriting. Specifically, DRCR employs two complementary feedback signals, discourse coherence and response quality, to construct preference data for both context rewriting and response generation. Moreover, we propose a dynamic self-evolution learning method that allows the rewriter and responder to continuously enhance their capabilities through mutual interaction in an iterative training loop. Comprehensive experiments conducted on four multi-party dialogue datasets substantiate the effectiveness of DRCR.

Abstract:
Parallel Speculative Decoding (PSD) accelerates traditional Speculative Decoding (SD) by overlapping draft generation with verification. However, it remains hampered by two fundamental challenges: (1) a theoretical speedup ceiling dictated by the speed ratio between the draft and target models, and (2) high computational waste and pipeline stall due to mid-sequence token rejections of early errors. To address these limitations, we introduce Double (Double Retrieval Speculative Parallelism). By bridging the gap between SD and PSD, our framework resolves the Retrieval Precision-Efficiency Dilemma through a novel synchronous mechanism. Specifically, we enable the draft model to execute iterative retrieval speculations to break the theoretical speedup limits; to alleviate rejections without rollback, the target model performs authoritative retrieval to generate multi-token guidance. Double is entirely training-free and lossless. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art speedup of 5.3 × on LLaMA3.3-70B and 2.8 × on Qwen3-32B, significantly outperforming the advanced method EAGLE-3 that requires extensive model training. Our code is available at https://github.com/Sylvan820/Double1 .

Abstract:
Knowledge-intensive visual question answering (VQA) requires external knowledge beyond image content, demanding precise visual grounding and coherent integration of visual and textual information. Although multimodal retrieval-augmented generation has achieved notable advances by incorporating external knowledge bases, existing approaches largely adopt single-pass frameworks that often fail to acquire sufficient knowledge and lack mechanisms to revise misdirected reasoning. We propose PMSR (Progressive Multimodal Search and Reasoning), a framework that progressively constructs a structured reasoning trajectory to enhance both knowledge acquisition and synthesis. PMSR uses dual-scope queries conditioned on both the latest record and the trajectory to retrieve diverse knowledge from heterogeneous knowledge bases. The retrieved evidence is then synthesized into compact records via compositional reasoning. This design facilitates controlled iterative refinement, which supports more stable reasoning trajectories with reduced error propagation. Extensive experiments across six diverse benchmarks (Encyclopedic-VQA, InfoSeek, MMSearch, LiveVQA, FVQA, and OK-VQA) demonstrate that PMSR consistently improves both retrieval recall and end-to-end answer accuracy.

Abstract:
Machine unlearning aims to forget sensitive knowledge from Large Language Models (LLMs) while maintaining general utility. However, existing approaches typically treat all tokens in a response indiscriminately and enforce uncertainty over the entire vocabulary. This global treatment results in unnecessary utility degradation and extends optimization to content-agnostic regions. To address these limitations, we propose PALU (Prefix-Aware Localized Unlearning), a framework driven by a local entropy maximization objective across both temporal and vocabulary dimensions. PALU reveals that (i) suppressing the sensitive prefix alone is sufficient to sever the causal generation link, and (ii) flattening only the top-K logits is adequate to maximize uncertainty in the critical subspace. These findings allow PALU to alleviate redundant optimization across the full vocabulary and parameter space while minimizing collateral damage to general model performance. Comprehensive evaluations validate that PALU achieves superior forgetting efficacy and utility preservation compared to state-of-the-art baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/nxZhai/PALU.

Abstract:
Olfaction lies at the intersection of chemical structure, neural encoding, and linguistic perception, yet existing representation methods fail to fully capture this pathway. Current approaches typically model only isolated segments of the olfactory pathway, overlooking the complete chain from molecule to receptors to linguistic descriptions. Such fragmentation yields learned embeddings that lack both biological grounding and semantic interpretability. We propose NOSE (Neural Olfactory-Semantic Embedding), a representation learning framework that aligns three modalities along the olfactory pathway: molecular structure, receptor sequence, and natural language description. Rather than simply fusing these signals, we decouple their contributions via orthogonal constraints, preserving the unique encoded information of each modality. To address the sparsity of olfactory language, we introduce a weak positive sample strategy to calibrate semantic similarity, preventing erroneous repulsion of similar odors in the feature space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NOSE achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance and excellent zero-shot generalization, confirming the strong alignment between its representation space and human olfactory intuition. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Xianyusyy/NOSE

Abstract:
MLLM-based GUI agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex user interface interaction tasks. However, long-horizon scenarios remain challenging, as these agents are burdened with tasks beyond their intrinsic capabilities, suffering from memory degradation, progress confusion, and math hallucination. To address these challenges, we present UI-Copilot , a collaborative framework where the GUI agent focuses on task execution while a lightweight copilot provides on-demand assistance for memory retrieval and numerical computation. We introduce memory decoupling to separate persistent observations from transient execution context, and train the policy agent to selectively invoke the copilot as Retriever or Calculator based on task demands. To enable effective tool invocation learning, we propose ̲ T ool- ̲ I ntegrated ̲ P olicy ̲ O ptimization ( TIPO ), which separately optimizes tool selection through single-turn prediction and task execution through on-policy multi-turn rollouts. Experimental results show that UI-Copilot-7B achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging MemGUI-Bench, outperforming strong 7B-scale GUI agents such as GUI-Owl-7B and UI-TARS-1.5-7B. Moreover, UI-Copilot-7B delivers a 17.1% absolute improvement on AndroidWorld over the base Qwen model, highlighting UI-Copilot’s strong generalization to real-world GUI tasks. Code website: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/UI-Copilot-0535.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation (KD) transfers capabilities from large language models (LLMs) to smaller students, yet it can fail unpredictably and also underpins model leakage risks. Our analysis revealed several distillation traps: tail noise, off-policy instability, and, most fundamentally, the teacher–student gap, that distort training signals. These traps manifest as overconfident hallucinations, self-correction collapse, and local decoding degradation, causing distillation to fail. Motivated by these findings, we propose a post-hoc calibration method that, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time enables control over a teacher’s distillability via reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT). Our objective combines task utility, KL anchor, and across-tokenizer calibration reward. This makes distillability a practical safety lever for foundation models, connecting robust teacher–student transfer with deployment-aware model protection. Experiments across math, knowledge QA, and instruction-following tasks show that students distilled from distillable calibrated teachers outperform SFT and KD baselines, while undistillable calibrated teachers retain their task performance but cause distilled students to collapse, offering a practical knob for both better KD and model IP protection.

Abstract:
Current Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on coarse-grained national labels for pluralistic value alignment. However, such macro-level supervision often obscures intra-country value heterogeneity, yielding a loose alignment.We argue that resolving this limitation requires shifting from national labels to multi-dimensional demographic constraints, which can identify groups with predictable, high-consensus value preference. To this end, we propose DVMap (High-Consensus Demographic-Value Mapping), a framework for fine-grained pluralistic value alignment. In this framework, we first present a demographic archetype extraction strategy to construct a high-quality value alignment corpus of 56,152 samples from the World Values Survey (WVS) by strictly retaining respondents with consistent value preferences under identical demographics. Over this corpus, we introduce a Structured Chain-of-Thought (CoT) mechanism that explicitly guides LLMs to reason about demographic-value correlations. Subsequently, we employ Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to achieve adaptive anchoring of value distributions. To rigorously evaluate generalization, we further establish a triple-generalization benchmark (spanning cross-demographic, cross-country, and cross-value) comprising 21,553 samples. Experimental results demonstrate that DVMap effectively learns the manifold mapping from demographics to values, exhibiting strong generalization and robustness. On cross-demographic tests, Qwen3-8B-DVMap achieves 48.6% accuracy, surpassing the advanced open-source LLM DeepSeek-v3.2 (45.1%). The source code and dataset are available at https://github.com/EnlightenedAI/DVMap.

Abstract:
Recent advances in text-to-audio-video (T2AV) generation have enabled models to synthesize audio-visual videos with multi-participant dialogues. However, existing evaluation benchmarks remain largely designed for human-recorded videos or single-speaker settings. As a result, structural failures in generated multi-talker dialogue videos, such as identity drift, unnatural turn transitions, and audio-visual misalignment, cannot be effectively diagnosed. To address this issue, we introduce MTAVG-Bench, a failure-driven diagnostic benchmark for multi-talker dialogue-centric audio-video generation. MTAVG-Bench is built via a semi-automatic pipeline, where 1.8k videos are generated using mainstream T2AV models with carefully designed prompts, yielding 2.4k manually annotated QA pairs for fine-grained failure diagnosis. The benchmark evaluates multi-speaker dialogue generation at four levels: audio-visual signal fidelity, temporal attribute consistency, social interaction, and cinematic expression. Built on a hierarchical failure taxonomy and a targeted QA protocol, MTAVG-Bench is primarily designed to evaluate whether proprietary and open-source omni-models can reliably identify failure modes in multi-speaker T2AV outputs. We benchmark 12 proprietary and open-source omni-models on MTAVG-Bench, with Gemini 3 Pro achieving the strongest overall performance, while leading open-source models remain competitive in signal fidelity and consistency. Overall, MTAVG-Bench enables fine-grained failure analysis for rigorous model comparison and targeted video generation refinement.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on test-time scaling to improve reasoning via increased inference computation, but often at the cost of efficiency. We revisit test-time behavior and uncover a simple yet underexplored phenomenon: reasoning uncertainty is highly localized—only a small subset of high-entropy tokens dominantly affects output correctness. Motivated by this, we propose Minimal Test-Time Intervention (MTI), a training-free framework that enhances reasoning accuracy and stability with minimal overhead. MTI includes: (i) Selective CFG intervention, applying classifier-free guidance only at uncertain positions; and (ii) Lightweight negative-prompt guidance, reusing the main model’s KV cache to approximate unconditional decoding efficiently. MTI yields consistent gains across general, coding, and STEM tasks—e.g., +9.28% average improvement on six benchmarks for DeepSeek-R1-7B and +11.25% on AIME2024 using Ling-mini-2.0—while remaining highly efficient.

Abstract:
Generative answer engines expose content through selective citation rather than ranked retrieval, fundamentally altering how visibility is determined. This shift calls for new optimization methods beyond traditional search engine optimization. Existing generative engine optimization (GEO) approaches primarily rely on token-level text rewriting, offering limited interpretability and weak control over the trade-off between citation visibility and content quality. We propose FeatGEO, a feature-level, multi-objective optimization framework that abstracts webpages into interpretable structural, content, and linguistic properties. Instead of directly editing text, FeatGEO optimizes over this feature space and uses a language model to realize feature configurations into natural language, decoupling high-level optimization from surface-level generation. Experiments on GEO-Bench across three generative engines demonstrate that FeatGEO consistently improves citation visibility while maintaining or improving content quality, substantially outperforming token-level baselines. Further analyses show that citation behavior is more strongly influenced by document-level content properties than by isolated lexical edits, and that the learned feature configurations generalize across language models of different scales.

Abstract:
Recent breakthroughs in video generation have demonstrated an emerging capability termed Chain-of-Frames (CoF) reasoning, where models resolve complex tasks through the generation of continuous frames. While these models show promise for Generative Video Reasoning (GVR), existing evaluation frameworks often rely on single-frame assessments, which can lead to outcome-hacking, where a model reaches a correct conclusion through an erroneous process. To address this, we propose a process-aware evaluation paradigm. We introduce VIPER, a comprehensive benchmark spanning 16 tasks across temporal, structural, symbolic, spatial, physics, and planning reasoning. Furthermore, we propose Process-outcome Consistency (POC@r), a new metric that utilizes VLM-as-Judge with a hierarchical rubric to evaluate both the validity of the intermediate steps and the final result. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art video models achieve POC@1.0 only about 20% and exhibit a significant outcome-hacking. We further explore the impact of test-time scaling and sampling robustness, highlighting a substantial gap between current video generation and true generalized visual reasoning. Our benchmark are released at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/VIPER.

Abstract:
Many recent studies have shown that the perception of speech can be decoded from brain signals and subsequently reconstructed as continuous language. However, there is a lack of neurological basis for how the semantic information embedded within brain signals can be used more effectively to guide language reconstruction. Predictive coding theory suggests the human brain naturally engages in continuously predicting future words that span multiple timescales. This implies that the decoding of brain signals could potentially be associated with a predictable future. To explore the predictive coding theory within the context of language reconstruction, this paper proposes PredFT (FMRI-to-Text decoding with Predictive coding). PredFT consists of a main network and a side network. The side network obtains brain predictive representation from related regions of interest (ROIs) with a self-attention module. The representation is then fused into the main network for continuous language decoding. Experiments on two naturalistic language comprehension fMRI datasets show that PredFT outperforms current decoding models on several evaluation metrics.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) store extensive factual knowledge acquired during pretraining, yet this knowledge is inherently static and may become inaccurate or outdated, leading to knowledge hallucinations. Knowledge editing offers an efficient alternative to full retraining by enabling targeted factual updates while preserving overall model behavior. Existing locate-then-edit methods, however, rely on fixed layer selection strategies, treating the locating stage as a static design choice and failing to account for the hierarchical and instance-dependent nature of knowledge representation in LLMs. In this paper, we propose FiDAL, a Fisher-driven adaptation-aware locating strategy that dynamically identifies which model components should be edited for a given knowledge update. FiDAL formulates localization as a weight-level decision problem and leverages Fisher Information to select layers that are both influential and sensitive to factual modifications. A lightweight probing stage with low-rank modulation enables efficient localization with minimal overhead. Experiments on standard benchmarks demonstrate that FiDAL consistently improves editing effectiveness and knowledge preservation across multiple editing methods.

Abstract:
Safety alignment is a fundamental prerequisite for building trustworthy artificial general intelligence. Despite substantial progress in safety alignment techniques, empirical evidence shows that aligned large language models can still produce unsafe responses under minor internal perturbations, revealing a robustness gap in existing safety mechanisms at the latent representation level. In this paper, we study the robustness evaluation of safety alignment under latent-space perturbations. We introduce Activation Steering Attack (ASA), and leverage the Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) as a diagnostic signal to probe the local sensitivity of safety behaviors in latent space. By measuring a model’s likelihood under controlled perturbations to its hidden representations, we assess the stability of its original responses. The probing signal is model-agnostic and supervision-free, enabling a general and reproducible diagnostic metric for analyzing safety robustness. Leveraging these probes, we systematically uncover a set of previously underexplored empirical findings, including (1) non-stationarity of layer vulnerabilities, revealing that the most vulnerable layer is an unstable property and even relocates after robustness training; (2) instance-level alignment with cross-layer consistency, where specific inputs remain universally vulnerable across the entire model hierarchy; (3) compositional effects of ASA, characterized by its incremental accumulation across sequential decoding steps and its potential for prompt-level jailbreak effectiveness.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models that use long chain-of-thought excel at problem-solving yet waste compute on redundant checks. Curbing this overthinking is hard: training-time length penalties can cripple ability, while inference-time early-exit adds system overhead. To bridge this gap, we propose Step-GRPO, a novel post-training framework that internalizes dynamic early-exit capabilities directly into the model. Step-GRPO shifts the optimization objective from raw tokens to semantic steps by utilizing linguistic markers to structure reasoning. We introduce a Dynamic Truncated Rollout mechanism that exposes the model to concise high-confidence trajectories during exploration, synergized with a Step-Aware Relative Reward that dynamically penalizes redundancy based on group-level baselines. Extensive experiments across three model sizes on diverse benchmarks demonstrate that Step-GRPO achieves a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off. On Qwen3-8B, our method reduces token consumption by 32.0% compared to the vanilla model while avoiding the accuracy degradation observed in traditional length-penalty methods.

Abstract:
Understanding and inferring causal relationships from texts is a core aspect of human cognition and is essential for advancing large language models (LLMs) towards artificial general intelligence. Existing work evaluating LLM causal reasoning primarily relies on synthetic or simplified texts with explicitly stated causal relationships. These texts typically feature short passages and few causal relations, failing to reflect the complexities of real-world reasoning. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs are capable of inferring causal relationships from real-world texts. We develop a benchmark drawn from real-world academic literature, which includes diverse texts with respect to length, complexity (different levels of explicitness, number of causal events and relationships), and domain. To the best of our knowledge, our benchmark is the first-ever real-world dataset for this task. Our experiments on this dataset show that LLMs face significant challenges in inferring causal relationships from real-world text, with the best-performing model achieving an average F 1 score of only 0.535. Through systematic analysis across aspects of real-world text (explicitness, number of causal events and relationships, length of text, domain), our benchmark offers targeted insights for further research into advancing LLM causal reasoning. Our code and dataset can be found at https://github.com/Ryan-Saklad/ReCITE.

Abstract:
VLA models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for transferring semantic knowledge from web-scale data to physical robotic control. However, current single-frame architectures suffer from intrinsic limitations: temporal myopia that discards historical dynamics, reasoning gaps between high-level instructions and low-level motor commands, and inference inefficiency due to autoregressive scalar decoding. In this work, we propose MIRTH, a unified framework designed to address these challenges. MIRTH augments a pretrained VLA backbone with three key innovations: (1) dual-scale temporal memory hubs that compress long-term scene evolution and short-term motion trends into compact embeddings; (2) latent reasoning tokens optimized via a mutual-information objective carving out a semantic plan space to align multimodal context with action trajectories; and (3) a parallel action decoding scheme that replaces autoregressive generation with vector-wise prediction to maximize control throughput. Extensive evaluations on the LIBERO simulation benchmark and a real-world LeRobot platform demonstrate that MIRTH achieves state-of-the-art performance and exhibiting emergent error recovery capabilities. We will release our code and collected datasets to facilitate reproducible research in embodied AI upon publication.

Abstract:
With the rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs), model pools have become increasingly heterogeneous in both capability and efficiency. Larger LLMs can improve quality but incur higher latency and cost, while smaller LLMs are the opposite, making per-query model selection crucial in practice. This has spawned LLM routers that dispatch each query to an appropriate model. Existing routers lack fine-grained resource awareness across deployment settings, which degrades efficiency metrics in real-world serving. To this end, We propose FLARE, a length-centric, resource-aware multi-LLM routing framework that uses length-based models to estimate per-query latency and cost. FLARE formulates routing as a discrete multi-objective optimization problem to achieve efficient trade-off. Experiments show that FLARE reduces latency and cost by up to 68% and 75% while maintaining competitive accuracy, and can be easily applied to new datasets and LLMs.

Abstract:
The rising sophistication of digital surveillance poses hurdles for concealing sensitive data within innocuous communication channels. Conventional image steganography relies on detectable pixel-level perturbations. In this paper, we introduce a novel steganography framework that fundamentally reorients the steganographic containers from the visual domain to the linguistic domain. To seamlessly bridge the gap from raw pixels to discriminative logits, we leverage the reversible latent space of discrete diffusion models to compress high-resolution secret images into lightweight binary payloads. The semantic stability of textual data ensures the integrity of the hidden payload across diverse platforms. Extensive evaluations confirm that this cross-modal approach establishes a superior equilibrium between embedding capacity and statistical undetectability in comparison to existing paradigms.

Abstract:
Language is a vehicle for thought, intricately tied to sounds, symbols, and meaning. However, most large language model (LLM) research focuses on meaning (semantics) and symbols (spelling) while largely overlooking sounds. Existing benchmarks on LLMs’ phonological abilities are either solvable through rote memorization or intertwined with other abilities, making them inadequate to measure LLMs’ genuine ability in phonological understanding. Here, we present Phun-Bench , a purpose-built Chinese benchmark with diverse tasks and settings across three dimensions (Homophony, Rhyme, and Phonetic Similarity), designed to systematically evaluate LLMs’ phonological understanding. Our results show that while LLMs excel at recalling correct pronunciations, they generally struggle to leverage phonological knowledge in the flexible and intuitive way that human speakers do. Moreover, through detailed analyses, we propose a hypothesis regarding the underlying mechanism of LLMs’ phonological understanding and “perception”, highlighting an underexplored frontier for future research.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models enhanced by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards have achieved significant performance gains by extending their chain-of-thought. However, this paradigm incurs substantial deployment costs as models often exhibit excessive verbosity on simple queries. Existing efficient reasoning methods relying on explicit length penalties often introduce optimization conflicts and leave the generative mechanisms driving overthinking largely unexamined. In this paper, we identify a phenomenon termed length shift where models increasingly generate unnecessary reasoning on trivial inputs during training. To address this, we introduce Dynamic Outlier Truncation (DOT), a training-time intervention that selectively suppresses redundant tokens. This method targets only the extreme tail of response lengths within fully correct rollout groups while preserving long-horizon reasoning capabilities for complex problems. To complement this intervention and ensure stable convergence, we further incorporate auxiliary KL regularization and predictive dynamic sampling. Experimental results across multiple model scales demonstrate that our approach significantly pushes the efficiency-performance Pareto frontier outward. Notably, on the AIME-24, our method reduces inference token usage by 78% while simultaneously increasing accuracy compared to the initial policy and surpassing state-of-the-art efficient reasoning methods.

Abstract:
Natural Language Processing is rapidly evolving into a primary instrument for Computational Social Science, with researchers increasingly using embeddings to measure latent constructs such as novelty, creativity, and bias. However, this transition faces a fundamental validity challenge: the “Proxy Presumption,” or the reliance on geometric properties (e.g., cosine distance) as direct measures of social concepts. We argue that without explicit validation, unsupervised representations remain entangled mixtures of the target construct ( C ) and confounding attributes ( Z ) like topic, style, and authorship. To bridge the gap between semantic embeddings and valid social measures, we introduce the Construct Validity Protocol (CVP). Drawing on causal representation learning and psychometrics, the CVP offers a rigorous pipeline from conceptualization to quantitative verification. We further propose Counterfactual Neutralization, a novel method using LLMs to reduce confounding in embedding space. By providing a standardized Validity Suite—including tests for discriminant, incremental, and predictive validity—this work offers the community a toolkit to transform heuristic proxies into robust, scientifically defensible instruments.

Abstract:
Conversational query rewriting (CQR) addresses context dependence in conversational search by rewriting each user query into a standalone form. Recent approaches leverage reinforcement learning (RL) to directly optimize retrieval effectiveness; however, they typically rely on a single rewrite, which struggles to accommodate the divergent preferences of sparse and dense retrievers and often suffers from conflicting optimization signals. We propose DVCQR, a Dual-View CQR framework that explicitly generates two complementary rewrites for each query: a sparse-view rewrite that emphasizes distinctive lexical anchors, and a dense-view rewrite that captures complete semantic constraints. Both rewrites are produced in a single pass via a structured reasoning process. To further mitigate objective conflicts, we introduce a stage-wise RL strategy that sequentially aligns the sparse and dense views with their corresponding retrievers using rank-based feedback. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks (TopiOCQA, QReCC, CAsT-19, and CAsT-20) demonstrate that DVCQR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods on most metrics under both sparse and dense retrieval settings, validating the effectiveness of dual-view rewriting and stage-wise retriever alignment.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on reasoning-intensive tasks, yet optimizing their reasoning efficiency remains an open challenge. While Test-Time Scaling (TTS) improves reasoning quality, it often leads to overthinking—wasting tokens on redundant computations. This work investigates how to efficiently and adaptively guide LLM TTS without additional training. Inspired by the concept of momentum in physics, we propose Momentum Uncertainty-guided Reasoning (MUR), which dynamically allocates thinking budgets to critical reasoning steps by tracking and aggregating step-wise uncertainty over time. To support flexible inference-time control, we introduce -control, a simple mechanism that tunes the reasoning budget via a single hyperparameter. We provide in-depth theoretical proof to support the superiority of MUR in terms of stability and biases. MUR is comprehensively evaluated against various TTS methods across four challenging benchmarks (MATH-500, AIME24, AIME25, and GPQA-diamond) using different sizes of recent Qwen3 models (1.7B, 4B, and 8B). Results demonstrate that MUR reduces computation by over 45% on average while improving accuracy by 0.33–3.46%.

Abstract:
In classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), Reward Models (RMs) serve as the fundamental signal provider for model alignment. As Large Language Models evolve into agentic systems capable of autonomous tool invocation and complex reasoning, the paradigm of reward modeling faces unprecedented challenges–most notably, the lack of benchmarks specifically designed to assess RM capabilities within tool-integrated environments. To address this gap, we present Plan-RewardBench, a trajectory-level preference benchmark designed to evaluate how well judges distinguish preferred versus distractor agent trajectories in complex tool-using scenarios. Plan-RewardBench covers four representative task families—(i) Safety Refusal, (ii) Tool-Irrelevance / Unavailability, (iii) Complex Planning, and (iv) Robust Error Recovery—comprising validated positive trajectories and confusable hard negatives constructed via multi-model natural rollouts, rule-based perturbations, and minimal-edit LLM perturbations. We benchmark representative RMs (generative, discriminative, and LLM-as-Judge) under a unified pairwise protocol, reporting accuracy trends across varying trajectory lengths and task categories. Furthermore, we provide diagnostic analyses of prevalent failure modes. Our results reveal that all three evaluator families face substantial challenges, with performance degrading sharply on long-horizon trajectories, underscoring the necessity for specialized training in agentic, trajectory-level reward modeling. Ultimately, Plan-RewardBench aims to serve as both a practical evaluation suite and a reusable blueprint for constructing agentic planning preference data.

Abstract:
To improve the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in clinical applications, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is extensively applied to provide factual medical knowledge. However, beyond general medical knowledge from open-ended datasets, clinical case-based knowledge is also critical for effective medical reasoning, as it provides context grounded in real-world patient experiences. Motivated by this, we propose Experience Retrieval-Augmentation ExpRAG framework based on Electronic Health Record(EHR), aiming to offer the relevant context from other patients’ discharge reports. ExpRAG performs retrieval through a coarse-to-fine process, utilizing an EHR-based report ranker to efficiently identify similar patients, followed by an experience retriever to extract task-relevant content for enhanced medical reasoning. To evaluate ExpRAG, we introduce DischargeQA, a clinical QA dataset with 1,280 discharge-related questions across diagnosis, medication, and instruction tasks. Each problem is generated using EHR data to ensure realistic and challenging scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that ExpRAG consistently outperforms a text-based ranker, achieving an average relative improvement of 5.2%, highlighting the importance of case-based knowledge for medical reasoning.

Abstract:
AI Memory, specifically how models organizes and retrieves historical messages, becomes increasingly valuable to Large Language Models (LLMs), yet existing methods (RAG and Graph-RAG) primarily retrieve memory through similarity-based mechanisms. While efficient, such System-1-style retrieval struggles with scenarios that require global reasoning or comprehensive coverage of all relevant information. In this work, We propose Mnemis, a novel memory framework that integrates System-1 similarity search with a complementary System-2 mechanism, termed Global Selection. Mnemis organizes memory into a base graph for similarity retrieval and a hierarchical graph that enables top-down, deliberate traversal over semantic hierarchies. By combining the complementary strength from both retrieval routes, Mnemis retrieves memory items that are both semantically and structurally relevant. Mnemis achieves state-of-the-art performance across all compared methods on long-term memory benchmarks, scoring 93.9 on LoCoMo and 91.6 on LongMemEval-S using GPT-4.1-mini.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP), particularly through instruction tuning, which enables broad task generalization without additional fine-tuning. However, their reliance on large-scale datasets—often collected from human or web sources—makes them vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where adversaries poison a small subset of data to implant hidden behaviors. Despite this growing risk, defenses for instruction-tuned models remain underexplored. We propose MB-Defense (Merging & Breaking Defense Framework), a novel training pipeline that immunizes instruction-tuned LLMs against diverse backdoor threats. MB-Defense comprises two stages: (i) Defensive Poisoning, which merges attacker and defensive triggers into a unified backdoor representation, and (ii) Backdoor Neutralization, which breaks this representation through additional training to restore clean behavior. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs show that MB-Defense substantially lowers attack success rates while preserving instruction-following ability. Our method offers a generalizable and data-efficient defense strategy, improving the robustness of instruction-tuned LLMs against unseen backdoor attacks.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a promising critic-free reinforcement learning paradigm for reasoning tasks. However, standard GRPO employs a coarse-grained credit assignment mechanism that propagates group-level rewards uniformly to to every token in a sequence, neglecting the varying contribution of individual reasoning steps. We address this limitation by introducing Outcome-grounded Advantage Reshaping (OAR), a fine-grained credit assignment mechanism that redistributes advantages based on how much each token influences the model’s final answer. We instantiate OAR via two complementary strategies: (1) OAR-P, which estimates outcome sensitivity through counterfactual token perturbations, serving as a high-fidelity attribution signal; (2) OAR-G, which uses an input-gradient sensitivity proxy to approximate the influence signal with a single backward pass. These importance signals are integrated with a conservative Bi-Level advantage reshaping scheme that suppresses low-impact tokens and boosts pivotal ones while preserving the overall advantage mass. Empirical results on extensive mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that while OAR-P sets the performance upper bound, OAR-G achieves comparable gains with negligible computational overhead, both significantly outperforming a strong GRPO baseline, pushing the boundaries of critic-free LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance on diverse vision-language tasks. However, LVLMs still suffer from hallucinations, generating text that contradicts the visual input. Existing research has primarily focused on mitigating object hallucinations, but often overlooks more complex relation hallucinations, particularly action relations involving interactions between objects. In this study, we empirically observe that the primary cause of action-relation hallucinations in LVLMs is the insufficient attention allocated to visual information. Thus, we propose a framework to locate action-relevant image regions and enhance the LVLM’s attention to those regions. Specifically, we define the Action-Relation Sensitivity (ARS) score to identify attention heads that are most sensitive to action-relation changes, thereby localizing action-relevant image regions that contain key visual cues. Then, we propose the Relation-aware Visual Enhancement (RVE) method to enhance the LVLM’s attention to these action-relevant image regions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, compared to existing baselines, our method achieves superior performance in mitigating action-relation hallucinations with negligible additional inference cost. Furthermore, it effectively generalizes to spatial-relation hallucinations and object hallucinations.

Abstract:
Many real-world applications require generating a chronological report from an evolving document stream; Timeline Summarization (TLS) provides a standard testbed for this setting. While large language models (LLMs) improve event synthesis, most LLM-based TLS systems remain monolithic: they repeatedly process overlapping evidence and often mirror the corpus’ bursty reporting patterns, producing redundant timelines with temporal/topical imbalance and high cost. We propose MAS-TLS, a multi-agent framework that casts TLS as a newsroom-like collaboration. A master editor steers balanced coverage by allocating system-visible evidence with a coverage–diversity objective; specialist reporter agents independently draft time-anchored, evidence-grounded events while cross-reviewing to limit redundancy; an adjudication round reconciles competing drafts and consolidates duplicates into a global timeline; and a non-stationary Bayesian controller adaptively staffs agents under token/time budgets. Experiments on three benchmarks show that MAS-TLS improves semantic coverage and temporal grounding while substantially reducing token usage and latency.

Abstract:
Conventional Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) benchmarks assume instructions are feasible and the referenced target exists, leaving agents ill-equipped to handle false-premise goals. We introduce VLN-NF , a benchmark with false-premise instructions where the target is absent from the specified area and agents must navigate, gather evidence through in-room exploration, and explicitly output NOT-FOUND. VLN-NF is constructed via a scalable pipeline that rewrites VLN instructions using an LLM and verifies target absence with a VLM, producing plausible yet factually incorrect goals. We further propose REV-SPL to jointly evaluate room reaching, exploration coverage, and decision correctness. To address this challenge, we present ROAM , a two-stage hybrid that combines supervised room-level navigation with LLM/VLM-driven in-room exploration guided by a free-space clearance prior. ROAM achieves the best REV-SPL among compared methods, while baselines often under-explore and terminate prematurely under unreliable instructions. Code and data will be released upon acceptance.

Abstract:
High-fidelity agent initialization is crucial for credible Agent-Based Modeling across diverse domains. A robust framework should be Topic-Adaptive, capturing macro-level joint distributions while ensuring micro-level individual rationality. Existing approaches fall into two categories: static data-based retrieval methods that fail to adapt to unseen topics absent from the data, and LLM-based generation methods that lack macro-level distribution awareness, resulting in inconsistencies between micro-level persona attributes and reality. To address these problems, we propose HAG, a Hierarchical Agent Generation framework that formalizes population generation as a two-stage decision process. Firstly, utilizing a World Knowledge Model to infer hierarchical conditional probabilities to construct the Topic-Adaptive Tree, achieving macro-level distribution alignment. Then, grounded real-world data, instantiation and agentic augmentation are carried out to ensure micro-level consistency. Given the lack of specialized evaluation, we establish a multi-domain benchmark and a comprehensive PACE evaluation framework. Extensive experiments show that HAG significantly outperforms representative baselines, reducing population alignment errors by an average of 37.7% and enhancing sociological consistency by 18.8%.

Abstract:
The performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) is significantly sensitive to the contextual position of information in the input. To investigate the mechanism behind this positional bias, our extensive experiments reveal a consistent phenomenon we term the attention basin: when presented with a sequence of structured items (e.g., retrieved documents or few-shot examples), models systematically assign higher attention to the items at the beginning and end of the sequence, while neglecting those in the middle. Crucially, our analysis further reveals that allocating higher attention to critical information is key to enhancing model performance. Based on these insights, we introduce Attention-Driven Reranking (AttnRank), a two-stage framework that (i) estimates a model’s intrinsic positional attention preferences using a small calibration set, and (ii) reorders retrieved documents or few-shot examples to align the most salient content with these high-attention positions. AttnRank is a model-agnostic, training-free, and plug-and-play method with minimal computational overhead. Experiments on multi-hop QA and few-shot in-context learning tasks demonstrate that AttnRank achieves substantial improvements across 10 large language models of varying architectures and scales, without modifying model parameters or training procedures.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences.Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences.We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals.By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users’ data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences.To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory.This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting “positive bias”, ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness.Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with multi-hop reasoning over knowledge-graphs (KGs), and we identify a previously overlooked structural reason for this difficulty: Transformer attention heads naturally specialize in distinct semantic relations across reasoning stages, forming a hop-aligned relay pattern. This key finding suggests that multi-hop reasoning is inherently multi-view, yet existing KG-based retrieval-augmented generation (KG-RAG) systems collapse all reasoning hops into a single representation, flat embedding space, suppressing this implicit structure and causing noisy or drifted path exploration. We introduce ParallaxRAG, a symmetric multi-view framework that decouples queries and KGs into aligned, head-specific retrieval spaces. By enforcing relational diversity across heads while constraining weakly related paths, ParallaxRAG constructs more accurate, cleaner subgraphs and guides LLMs through grounded, hop-wise reasoning. On WebQSP and CWQ, it achieves state-of-the-art retrieval and QA performance, substantially reduces hallucination, and generalizes strongly to the biomedical BioASQ benchmark. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/LucaLiu1313/ParallaxRAG.

Abstract:
AI development is often framed as the outcome of isolated research and engineering efforts, yet evidence from deployed systems suggests that language models interact through a shared data ecosystem. While the optimization of individual models is extensively studied, the emergent properties of this interconnected population remain largely unexplored, limiting our ability to predict long-term ecosystem trajectories We term this process data pollination, the unintentional circulation of synthetic model outputs through shared online platforms and web-scale training corpora, and formalize it as a population-based evolutionary framework to investigate stability dynamics under synthetic data training. Our theoretical analysis and controlled experiments involving 320 language models demonstrate that population dynamics can mitigate the model collapse observed in single-lineage recursive training, yielding stable or improving performance across diverse benchmarks. Crucially, we find that ecological diversity functions as a fundamental resilience mechanism that safeguards the ecosystem against collapse, highlighting the critical importance of maintaining model diversity for sustainable AI development.

Abstract:
This work characterizes large language models’ chain-of-thought generation as a structured trajectory through representation space. We show that mathematical reasoning traverses functionally ordered, step-specific subspaces that become increasingly separable with layer depth. This structure already exists in base models, while reasoning training primarily accelerates convergence toward termination-related subspaces rather than introducing new representational organization. While early reasoning steps follow similar trajectories, correct and incorrect solutions diverge systematically at late stages. This late-stage divergence enables mid-reasoning prediction of final-answer correctness with ROC–AUC up to 0.87. Furthermore, we introduce trajectory-based steering, an inference-time intervention framework that enables reasoning correction and length control based on derived ideal trajectories. Together, these results establish reasoning trajectories as a geometric lens for interpreting, predicting, and controlling LLM reasoning behavior.

Abstract:
Estimating the cognitive complexity of reading comprehension (RC) items is crucial for assessing item difficulty before it is administered to learners. Unlike syntactic and semantic features, such as passage length or semantic similarity between options, cognitive features that arise during answer reasoning are not readily extractable using existing NLP tools and have traditionally relied on human annotation. In this study, we examine whether large language models (LLMs) can estimate the cognitive complexity of RC items by focusing on two dimensions—Evidence Scope and Transformation Level—that indicate the degree of cognitive burden involved in reasoning about the answer. Our experimental results demonstrate that LLMs can approximate the cognitive complexity of items, indicating their potential as tools for prior difficulty analysis. Further analysis reveals a gap between LLMs’ reasoning ability and their metacognitive awareness: even when they produce correct answers, they sometimes fail to correctly identify the features underlying their own reasoning process.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) behave non-deterministically, and prompting has become a common method for steering their outputs.A popular strategy is to assign a persona to the model to produce more varied, context-sensitive responses, similar to how responses vary across human individuals.Against the expectation that persona prompting yields a wide range of opinions, our experiments show that LLMs keep consistent value orientations.We observe a persistent inertia in their responses, where certain moral and value dimensions (especially harm avoidance and fairness) stay skewed in one direction across persona settings.To study this, we use role-play at scale, which pairs randomized persona prompts with a macro-level analysis of model outputs.Our results point to strong internal biases and value preferences in LLMs, which we call value orientation and inertia. These models warrant scrutiny and adjustment before use in applications where balanced outputs matter.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly operate as Deep Research (DR) Agents capable of autonomous investigation and information synthesis, reliable evaluation of their task performance has become a critical bottleneck. Current benchmarks predominantly rely on static datasets, which suffer from several limitations: limited task generality, temporal misalignment, and data contamination. To address these, we introduce DR-Arena, a fully automated evaluation framework that pushes DR agents to their capability limits through dynamic investigation. DR-Arena constructs real-time Information Trees from fresh web trends to ensure the evaluation rubric is synchronized with the live world state, and employs an automated Examiner to generate structured tasks testing two orthogonal capabilities: Deep reasoning and Wide coverage. DR-Arena further adopts Adaptive Evolvement Loop, a state-machine controller that dynamically escalates task complexity based on real-time performance, demanding deeper deduction or wider aggregation until a decisive capability boundary emerges. Experiments with six advanced DR agents demonstrate that DR-Arena achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.94 with the LMSYS Search Arena leaderboard. This represents state-of-the-art alignment with human preferences without any manual efforts, validating DR-Arena as a reliable alternative for costly human adjudication.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents struggle with ultra-long-horizon tasks requiring hundreds or thousands of interaction steps. Traditional context management approaches face a fundamental dilemma: preserving complete histories rapidly exhausts context windows and forces crude truncation, while aggressive summarization discards critical information prematurely. We propose Predictive Adaptive Context Extraction (PACE), a novel framework that reconceptualizes context management as a Next Step Prediction problem. Inspired by neural attention, PACE dynamically constructs context by adjusting historical memory granularity based on its predicted relevance for the next action. Comprehensive evaluation across diverse benchmarks and models demonstrates that PACE consistently improves task success rates, with larger gains on complex tasks and robust cross-lingual performance. Crucially, PACE enables agents to sustain effective reasoning for 4,897 interaction steps in ultra-long-horizon scenarios, achieving a 66.2 improvement over the full-context ReAct baseline and 5.1 over advanced folding baselines. This fundamentally advances the capability of LLM-based agents in previously intractable long-horizon scenarios. Our code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PACE-B000/.

Abstract:
Spurious correlations cause deep learning models to rely on predictive shortcuts that hold in the training data but break under distribution shifts, leading to large performance drops for minority groups. Existing strategies often rely on costly group annotations or employ unstable adversarial training. In this paper, we propose Prototype-guided debiasing using Robust Invariant Feature Transformations (PRIFT), a novel framework that mitigates spurious correlations by manipulating latent space geometry. Specifically, we introduce a prototype-guided modeling approach that leverages natural language prompts to represent confounders, transforming abstract biases into interpretable geometric anchors without auxiliary classifiers. Based on these anchors, we introduce a centered projection operator that adaptively purifies representations by removing confounding deviations specific to instances while preserving essential semantic structure. Furthermore, PRIFT can handle confounding factor information at different levels, ranging from true labels to unsupervised latent inference. Experiments on four text classification benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method; notably, PRIFT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and improves worst-group accuracy by over 20% on the CivilComments dataset compared to standard empirical risk minimization.

Abstract:
LLM-based Multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown strong capabilities across a wide range of domains. Their success largely hinges on the collaboration topology design, which has emerged as a central research focus in the automated MAS design.However, existing approaches are fundamentally constrained by their reliance on homogeneous LLMs, which significantly limits overall system intelligence.In response to this limitation, we for the first time propose the concept of Automated Design of Heterogeneous-LLMs-based MAS (ADHM).ADHM sheds light on a promising avenue for advancing collective intelligence, which focuses on the automated design of cost-effective MAS composed of diverse LLMsand roles to suit various queries.Toward this challenging goal, we propose Hetero-Designer, a novel pipeline that efficiently encodes intricate dependencies among queries, LLMs and roles through a novel Binary-Star Transformer and constructs Hetero-MAS in an autoregressive graph generation process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Hetero-Designer is: (1) high-performing on various benchmarks, (2) economical in reducing overhead, (3) extensible to unseen LLMs and roles.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in chart understanding, largely driven by supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on increasingly large synthetic datasets.However, scaling SFT data alone is inefficient and overlooks a key property of charts: charts are programmatically generated visual artifacts, where small, code-controlled visual changes can induce drastic shifts in semantics and correct answers.Learning this counterfactual sensitivity requires VLMs to discriminate fine-grained visual differences, yet standard SFT treats training instances independently and provides limited supervision to enforce this behavior.To address this, we introduce ChartCF, a data-efficient training framework designed to enhance counterfactual sensitivity.ChartCF consists of: (1) a counterfactual data synthesis pipeline via code modification, (2) a chart similarity-based data selection strategy that filters overly difficult samples for improved training efficiency, and (3) multimodal preference optimization across both textual and visual modalities.Experiments on five benchmarks show that ChartCF achieves superior or comparable performance to strong chart-specific VLMs while using significantly less training data.

Abstract:
Humans acquire knowledge through three cognitive stages: perceiving information, comprehending knowledge, and adapting knowledge to solve novel problems. Videos serve as an effective medium for knowledge acquisition, facilitating a natural progression through these learning stages. However, existing video benchmarks fail to evaluate the knowledge acquisition capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). To address this gap, we introduce Video-MMMU, a multi-modal, multi-discipline, multi-track benchmark that evaluates LMMs’ ability to acquire knowledge from college-level, educational videos. Video-MMMU features a collection of 300 videos and 900 human-annotated questions across six disciplines, evaluating knowledge acquisition through stage-aligned question-answer pairs: Perception, Comprehension, and Adaptation. Beyond measuring final accuracy, Video-MMMU proposes the performance gain metric that quantifies an LMM’s learning gain from video, shifting the focus of evaluation from absolute performance to learning efficiency. Our evaluation reveals a substantial gap between human learners and current LMMs, highlighting the need to improve models’ ability to learn and adapt knowledge from video content.

Abstract:
Mobile GUI agents powered by large foundation models enable autonomous task execution in applications, but frequent updates that alter UI appearance and reorganize workflows cause agents trained on historical data to fail. Despite these surface changes, we observe that functional semantics and task intents remain fundamentally stable. Building on this insight, we introduce MAGNET, a memory-driven adaptive agent framework with dual-level memory: stationary memory that links diverse visual features to stable functional semantics for robust action grounding and procedural memory that captures stable task intents across varying workflows. Furthermore, we propose a dynamic memory evolution mechanism that continuously refines both memories by prioritizing frequently accessed knowledge. Evaluations on the online benchmark AndroidWorld demonstrate substantial improvements over memory-augmented baselines, while offline benchmarks confirm consistent gains under distribution shifts. These results validate that leveraging stable structures across interface changes improves agent performance and generalization in evolving software environments.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the dominant paradigm for training Large Language Model (LLM) agents on long-horizon tasks. However, sparse and delayed rewards often lead to trajectory neglect, in which agents lose focus on the task goal and interaction history at intermediate steps. Prior work has explored step-level supervision using Shannon-entropy–based uncertainty signals, which conflate inherent state complexity with agent confidence and therefore provide unreliable estimates of decision reliability. To address this issue, we propose normalized entropy, which measures confidence deviations relative to an agent’s average behavior under a given state, thereby strengthening the association between low-quality actions and trajectory neglect. Building on this insight, we introduce Selective Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization (STAPO), a hierarchical group-based RL framework. STAPO leverages normalized entropy to locate outlier steps associated with trajectory neglect and optimizes them via a joint mechanism of trajectory-aware reward and trajectory-independent penalty, enhancing trajectory awareness while preserving training stability. Extensive experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and Search-Augmented QA demonstrate that STAPO achieves state-of-the-art performance while substantially alleviating trajectory neglect, validating its effectiveness and robustness for agentic tasks.

Abstract:
Knowing and teaching differ fundamentally: effective instruction requires transforming knowledge into forms learners can grasp. Large language models, when asked to generate lessons (a concrete form of teaching), produce content lacking pedagogical depth. We trace this failure to three decisions that expert teachers make: selecting content by recognizing each source’s instructional role, sequencing topics so foundations precede applications, and synthesizing components into a unified whole. To scaffold these decisions, we introduce TeachCraft , a framework with three agents: Explorer classifies sources by pedagogical intent to guide selection; Planner orders objectives from foundational to advanced; Generator produces lesson materials through a schema that ensures consistency across components. To evaluate this approach, we construct LessonBench, 40 expert-designed lessons paired with two to five heterogeneous source documents, on which TeachCraft achieves 67.8% win rate in human evaluation and 79.6% in LLM-based evaluation against eight baselines, with ablations confirming that each decision contributes independently to overall lesson quality.[Source code is available at ]

Abstract:
Evaluating the safety robustness of LLMs is critical for their deployment. However, mainstream Red Teaming methods rely on online generation and black-box output analysis. These approaches are not only costly but also suffer from feedback latency, making them unsuitable for agile diagnostics after training a new model.To address this, we propose N-GLARE (A Non-Generative, Latent Representation-Efficient LLM Safety Evaluator). N-GLARE operates entirely on the model’s latent representations, bypassing the need for full text generation. It characterizes hidden layer dynamics by analyzing the APT (Angular-Probabilistic Trajectory) of latent representations and introducing the JSS (Jensen-Shannon Separability) metric.Experiments on over 40 models and 20 red teaming strategies demonstrate that the JSS metric exhibits high consistency with Red Teaming safety rankings at less than 1% token and runtime cost.

Abstract:
Current LLM role-playing systems model persona as a monolithic, static attribute, conflating identity consistency with emotional rigidity. This leads to either robotic repetition or catastrophic persona drift under sustained interaction. We introduce Dynamic Persona Coherence, a framework that decouples Identity-Layer Stability (time-invariant traits) from Adaptive-Layer Appropriateness (history-dependent psychological evolution). We operationalize this through the L/M/S Psychological State Model, which represents persona dynamics across long-term identity, mid-term meaning/stress accumulation, and short-term affect. On top of this state representation, a closed-loop alignment system comprising an automated evaluator (Persona Consistency Critic, PCC), a selective repository (Persona Case Repository, PCR), and a trajectory-adjusting corrector (Persona Drift Suppressor, PDS) enables autonomous coherence repair. Experiments on GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-V3.2 demonstrate consistent improvements (+16–84% PCC gains).

Abstract:
Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance reasoning capabilities on unlabeled test streams by deriving pseudo-rewards from majority voting consensus.However, existing TTRL methods rely exclusively on positive pseudo-labeling strategies.Such reliance becomes vulnerable under challenging scenarios where answer distributions are highly dispersed, resulting in weak consensus that inadvertently reinforces incorrect trajectories as supervision signals.In this paper, we propose SCRL (Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning), a robust test-time reinforcement learning framework that effectively mitigates label noise amplification.SCRL develops Selective Positive Pseudo-Labeling, which enforces strict consensus criteria to filter unreliable majorities. Complementarily, SCRL introduces Entropy-Gated Negative Pseudo-Labeling, the first negative supervision mechanism in TTRL, to reliably prune incorrect trajectories based on generation uncertainty. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SCRL achieves substantial improvements over baselines, while maintaining robust generalization and training stability under constrained rollout budgets.

Abstract:
Social bot accounts have long been disseminating disinformation and engaging in malicious activities on social media platforms. Detecting these social bots has become a critical and urgent task, essential for maintaining a healthy online ecosystem. Existing social bot detection research usually provides detection results directly without corresponding supportive explanations, making it difficult to assess the extent to which such predictions are trustworthy. This is a key concern for online moderation. In this work, we explore the detection interpretation and summarize a four-dimensional clue framework from individual and social perspectives. We propose CDRBot, which primarily employs outcome-reward reinforcement learning to train inspectors to generate faithful, grounded, and readable clues from the User Information, Semantic Features, Interactive Situation, and Behavioral Pattern. These clues are then integrated to make final predictions. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms other baselines in detection performance. The generated clues are faithful, grounded, and readable, and can significantly enhance the performance of large language models in social bot detection.

Abstract:
Languages vary widely in how meanings map to word forms. These mappings have been found to support efficient communication; however, this theory does not account for systematic relations within word forms. We examine how a restricted set of grammatical meanings (e.g. person, number) are expressed on verbs and pronouns across typologically diverse languages. Consistent with prior work, we find that verb and pronoun forms are shaped by competing communicative pressures for simplicity (minimizing the inventory of grammatical distinctions) and accuracy (enabling recovery of intended meanings). Crucially, our proposed model uses a novel measure of complexity (inverse of simplicity) based on the learnability of meaning-to-form mappings. This innovation captures fine-grained regularities in linguistic form, allowing better discrimination between attested and unattested systems, and establishes a new connection from efficient communication theory to systematicity in natural language.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently cited for their sophisticated pragmatic reasoning (CITATION), recent progress in sarcasm detection increasingly relies on synthetic benchmarks (CITATION). This study exposes a catastrophic generalization gap in this paradigm: we observe that models achieve near-perfect accuracy on synthetic data but collapse to random guessing on organic human speech. By triangulating hidden state geometry, entropy analysis, and causal interventions, we demonstrate that this disparity stems from shortcut learning (CITATION)—models exploit the low-entropy statistical signatures of generated text while remaining “semantically blind” to the pragmatic cues essential for irony. Our findings indicate that high performance on synthetic leaderboards reflects forensic pattern matching rather than the genuine linguistic intelligence assumed in prior work, creating a statistical mirage of competence.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance in general machine translation, yet their ability in culture-aware scenarios remains poorly understood. To bridge this gap, we introduce CanMT, a Culture-Aware Novel-Driven Parallel Dataset for Machine Translation, together with a theoretically grounded, multi-dimensional evaluation frame work for assessing cultural translation quality. Leveraging CanMT, we systematically evaluate a wide range of LLMs and translation systems under different translation strategy constraints. Our findings reveal substantial performance disparities across models and demonstrate that translation strategies exert a systematic influence on model behavior. Further analysis shows that translation difficulty varies across types of culture-specific items, and that a persistent gap remains between models’recognition of culture-specific knowledge and their ability to correctly operationalize it in translation outputs. In addition, incorporating reference translations is shown to substantially improve evaluation reliability in LLM-as-a-judge, underscoring their essential role in assessing culture-aware translation quality. The corpus and code are available at CanMT.

Abstract:
Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks. However, manually designing optimal communication topologies is labor-intensive, while automated expansion methods often result in bloated structures with redundant agents, leading to excessive token consumption. To address this problem, we introduce AgentSlimming, a plug-and-play compression framework for graph-structured multi-agent workflows. Motivated by the AgentPruner and AgentQuant in neural networks, AgentSlimming compresses workflows by firstly estimate the importance score of each agent with a hybrid mechanism, and then removing redundant agents or replacing them with low-cost ones, where each operation is then validated with a baseline-anchored acceptance rule to prevent performance collapse. Experiments show that AgentSlimming reduces average token cost by up to 78.9% with negligible performance degradation, and even sometimes improves accuracy, achieving a strong Pareto-optimal trade-off between cost and quality.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have remarkable capabilities, but adapting them to specialized domains poses a fundamental question: how should accumulated experience be represented and leveraged? Existing approaches represent experience either as explicit textual artifacts in prompts ( e.g. , retrieved documents or dialogues) or implicitly within model weights via fine-tuning ( e.g. , LoRA adapters). However, textual methods are limited by context windows and cannot internalize knowledge, while parametric fine-tuning yields one adapter per task with minimal cross-task skill reuse. We propose ReX ( Re usable e X perience), an experience-centric adaptation framework that treats latent experiences — recurring reasoning patterns and skills — as fundamental units for LLM specialization. Our method learns a shared Experience Bank of foundational skill vectors and uses a VAE-based encoder to map each input to a low-dimensional experience code. An Experience Router then dynamically composes the relevant skill vectors from this bank into a lightweight adapter for that input. By reusing skills across inputs, ReX enables implicit knowledge sharing across tasks without any explicit task identifiers. Experiments on multi-task NLP benchmarks show that this approach outperforms standard task-specific fine-tuning, yielding improved generalization through flexible skill reuse. Code is available at https://github.com/iLearn-Lab/ACL26-ReX .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse tasks, largely driven by large-scale pretraining. However, this data abundance introduces test data contamination, where benchmark datasets overlap with pretraining corpora, undermining the reliability of model evaluation by confounding memorization with genuine generalization. To mitigate this issue, existing training data detectors attempt to identify clean (unseen) samples from contaminated test sets, but often suffer from residual contamination due to the black-box nature of LLMs. As a result, contaminated data may be mistakenly retained, leading to unreliable evaluation.To address this challenge, we propose FTD (FDR-controlled Training Data detection), a principled framework that detects and filters contaminated evaluation data while providing a statistical guarantee: the proportion of contaminated samples mistakenly retained as clean, the false discovery rate (FDR), is provably controlled below a user-specified threshold. FTD combines multiple complementary detectors via an adaptive weighting strategy, and we theoretically show it achieves high statistical power under valid FDR control. Extensive experiments on real-world benchmarks demonstrate that FTD significantly reduces residual contamination compared to existing methods while preserving evaluation consistency.

Abstract:
Low-resource multilingual OCR faces a dual challenge: complex script structures and severe data scarcity. In such settings, existing OCR models often struggle, as coarse visual representations combined with weak linguistic priors lead to frequent errors among visually similar characters.To address this, we present BASA (Beyond Atomic Sub-character Alignment), a OCR framework built upon high-resolution visual and language backbones with a novel glyph-aware interface. The core technical contribution is the Glyph-Aware Fine-grained Adapter (GAFA). Unlike standard linear projectors, GAFA employs learnable glyph prototypes to actively align sub-character structural primitives (e.g., strokes and radicals) with visual features, explicitly resolving topological ambiguities during vision–language alignment. To complement this, we introduce a two-stage curriculum learning strategy supported by a Glyph-Aware Reverse Synthesis pipeline, which generates large-scale multilingual training corpora with automatic, zero-cost component labels. Furthermore, we construct BASA-Bench, a representative benchmark spanning 11 languages with diverse script structures and 23 authentic scenarios. Experiments demonstrate that BASA achieves consistent improvements over strong OCR baselines, particularly on scripts with complex compositions. Our model and benchmark will be available at https://github.com/NcutLLM/BASA .

Abstract:
Text-attributed graphs (TAGs) require jointly modeling relational structure and node-level text. Existing GNN-LLM approaches perform by incorporating large language models at inference time for processing the text attributes, resulting in costly deployment. More fundamentally, LLM knowledge is typically used in a sample-wise manner, leading to inefficient utilization across graph instances. In this work, we study how interactions with LLM embedding spaces affect graph representations, and show that projecting into the LLM space can learn better GNNs. That is to say, the knowledge encoded in LLM embeddings can be compressed into graph representations. Based on this insight, we propose a framework that internalizes LLM knowledge within graph models and supports inference-efficient TAG learning. Our framework employs a hierarchical Proxy-Purifier module with distribution-level regularization, using LLM embeddings only as training-time guidance. With this module, the model operates TAGs without invoking LLMs, achieving high efficiency as standard GNNs without LLMs. Notably, experiments on five popular TAG tasks further demonstrate that our method can also achieve consistent performance gains, in comparison to existing GNN-LLM approaches.

Abstract:
The widespread integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates rigorous and systematic safety evaluation. Existing paradigms either rely on constructed benchmarks to assess safety from predefined perspectives, or employ dynamic red-teaming to probe potential vulnerabilities. While effective, these approaches face challenges, as they depend heavily on expert domain knowledge, offer limited systematic guarantees, and are vulnerable to rapid obsolescence. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel framework POLARIS that brings the rigor of specification-based software testing to AI safety. POLARIS first compiles unstructured natural-language policies into First-Order Logic (FOL) representations, establishing a traceable link between high-level rules and concrete test cases. This formalization enables the construction of a Semantic Policy Graph, where complex policy violation scenarios are encoded as traversable paths. By systematically exploring this graph, POLARIS uncovers compositional violation patterns, which are then instantiated into executable natural-language test queries, enabling coverage-driven and reproducible safety testing. Experiments demonstrate that POLARIS achieves higher policy coverage and attack success counts compared to established baselines. Crucially, by bridging formal methods and AI safety, POLARIS provides a principled, automated approach to ensuring LLMs adhere to safety-critical policies with verifiable traceability.

Abstract:
Large language models solve complex tasks by generating long reasoning chains, achieving higher accuracy at the cost of increased computational cost and reduced ability to isolate functionally relevant reasoning. Prior work on compact reasoning shortens such chains through probabilistic sampling, heuristics, or supervision from frontier models, but offers limited insight into whether models internally encode token-level functional importance for answer generation. We address this gap diagnostically and propose greedy pruning, a likelihood-preserving deletion procedure that iteratively removes reasoning tokens whose removal minimally degrades model likelihood under a specified objective, yielding length-controlled reasoning chains. We evaluate pruned reasoning in a distillation framework and show that students trained on pruned chains outperform a frontier-model–supervised compression baseline at matched reasoning lengths. Finally, our analysis reveals systematic pruning patterns and shows that attention scores can predict greedy pruning ranks, further suggesting that models encode a nontrivial functional importance structure over reasoning tokens.

Abstract:
Entity alignment (EA) aims to identify entities across different knowledge graphs (KGs) that refer to the same real-world object and plays a critical role in knowledge fusion and integration. Traditional EA methods mainly rely on knowledge representation learning, but their performance is often limited under noisy or sparsely supervised scenarios. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been introduced to EA and achieved notable improvements by leveraging rich semantic knowledge. However, existing LLM-based EA approaches typically treat LLMs as black-box decision makers, resulting in limited interpretability, and the direct use of large-scale triples substantially increases inference cost. To address these challenges, we propose EA-Agent , a reasoning-driven agent for EA. EA-Agent formulates EA as a structured reasoning process with multi-step planning and execution, enabling interpretable alignment decisions. Within this process, it introduces attribute and relation triple selectors to filter redundant triples before feeding them into the LLM, effectively addressing efficiency challenges. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that EA-Agent consistently outperforms existing EA methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance. The source code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/EA-Agent-5696.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) serves as a cornerstone technique for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, its training is often plagued by entropy collapse , a rapid decline in policy entropy that limits exploration and undermines training effectiveness. While recent works attempt to mitigate this issue via several heuristic entropy interventions, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct comprehensive theoretical and empirical analyses of entropy dynamics in RLVR, offering two main insights: (1) We derive a tight approximation for token-level entropy change at each update step, revealing four governing factors and providing a unified theoretical framework of how existing methods influence entropy; (2) We reveal a fundamental limitation of recent approaches: they rely on heuristic adjustments to one or two of these factors, leaving other relevant factors unconsidered, thus inherently limiting their effectiveness. Motivated by these findings, we propose STEER, a principled entropy-modulation method that adaptively reweighs tokens based on theoretically-estimated entropy variations. Extensive experiments across six mathematical reasoning and three coding benchmarks demonstrate that STEER effectively mitigates entropy collapse and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
As Large Language Model (LLM) alignment evolves from simple completions to complex, highly sophisticated generation, Reward Models are increasingly shifting toward rubric-guided evaluation to mitigate surface-level biases. However, the community lacks a unified benchmark to assess this evaluation paradigm, as existing benchmarks lack both the discriminative complexity and the ground-truth rubric annotations required for rigorous analysis. To bridge this gap, we introduce RubricBench, a curated benchmark with 1,147 pairwise comparisons specifically designed to assess the reliability of rubric-based evaluation. Our construction employs a multi-dimensional filtration pipeline to target hard samples featuring nuanced input complexity and misleading surface bias, augmenting each with expert-annotated, atomic rubrics derived strictly from instructions. Comprehensive experiments reveal a substantial capability gap between human-annotated and model-generated rubrics, indicating that even state-of-the-art models struggle to autonomously specify valid evaluation criteria, lagging considerably behind human-guided performance.

Abstract:
Recent progress in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) offers a practical path to self-improving language models, but existing methods face a key trade-off: endogenous self-play can drift over iterations, while corpus-grounded approaches rely on curated data environments. We present WIST, a Web-grounded Iterative Self-play Tree framework for domain-targeted reasoning improvement that learns directly from the open-web without requiring any pre-arranged domain corpus. WIST incrementally expands a domain tree to structure exploration and retrieves and cleans path-consistent web evidence to construct a controllable training environment. It then performs Challenger-Solver self-play with verifiable rewards, and feeds learnability signals back to update node posteriors and guide subsequent exploration through an adaptive curriculum. Across four backbones, WIST consistently improves over the base models and typically outperforms both purely endogenous self-evolution and corpus-grounded self-play baselines, with the Overall gains reaching +9.8 (Qwen3-4B-Base) and +9.7 (OctoThinker-8B-Hybrid-Base). WIST is also domain-steerable: improving Qwen3-8B-Base by +14.79 in medicine and Qwen3-4B-Base by +5.28 on PhyBench. Ablations further confirm the importance of WIST’s key components for stable open-web learning. Our Code is available at https://github.com/lfy-123/WIST.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) excel at general-purpose tasks, yet adapting their responses to individual users remains challenging. Retrieval augmentation provides a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning by conditioning LLMs on user history records, and existing approaches typically select these records based on semantic relevance. We argue that relevance serves as an unreliable proxy for utility: a record may be semantically similar to a query yet fail to improve generation quality or even degrade it due to redundancy or conflicting information. To bridge this gap, we propose PURPLE, a contextual bandit framework that oPtimizes UseR Profiles for LLM pErsonalization. In contrast to a greedy selection of the most relevant records, PURPLE treats profile construction as an order-sensitive generation process and utilizes a Plackett-Luce ranking model to capture complex inter-record dependencies. By training with semantically rich feedback provided by the likelihood of the reference response, our method aligns retrieval directly with generation quality. Extensive experiments on nine personalization tasks demonstrate that PURPLE consistently outperforms strong heuristic and retrieval-augmented baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency, establishing a principled and scalable solution for optimizing user profiles.

Abstract:
Despite recent progress, the reasoning capabilities of large multimodal language models (MLLMs) remain fundamentally constrained by static supervision, where fixed prompts, rules, or reward models provide non-adaptive guidance throughout training. Such static signals are often sufficient to enforce output formats, but fail to shape the underlying reasoning process, leading to brittle generalization and performance saturation in complex decision-making tasks. We propose Evo-PI , a principle-centric learning framework that treats reasoning principles as explicit, language-based supervision signals that can be generated, evaluated, and iteratively evolved. Instead of relying on fixed rewards, Evo-PI enables a co-evolutionary loop in which principles guide model reasoning, while model behaviors in turn refine the principles that supervise them. This dynamic alignment mechanism allows supervision to progressively adapt to the model’s reasoning deficiencies. We instantiate Evo-PI in medical visual question answering as a high-stakes testbed requiring structured visual–textual reasoning. Across eight benchmarks and multiple model backbones, Evo-PI consistently improves reasoning accuracy, achieving gains of up to 24.6%. Our results suggest that evolving principle-guided supervision offers a scalable and general paradigm for training expert-aligned reasoning in multimodal language models.

Abstract:
Scaling laws have enabled predictable compute allocation for pre-training and for RL in reasoning tasks. However, research on retrieval reinforcement generation (RAG) remains insufficient and there is a lack of fundamental understanding of the interaction between retrieval quality and reinforcement learning computation. We present the first systematic study of RL scaling for RAG across three knowledge-intensive benchmarks. We introduce the Retrieval Bottleneck Hypothesis and derive sigmoidal scaling laws showing that retrieval quality, not RL compute, determines the asymptotic performance ceiling. Our analysis reveals three principles: (1) retrieval quality bounds achievable performance, with improving retrieval yielding larger gains than algorithmic innovations; (2) design choices (training objectives, rewards, off-policy methods) primarily modulate compute efficiency, with secondary effects on the ceiling that are substantially smaller than retrieval quality improvements; and (3) stable configurations enable extrapolation with 3.1% error at 4x compute. We further uncover RAG-specific dynamics: optimal document count increases with training, and RL algorithm effectiveness depends critically on retrieval quality. These insights yield RAG-ScaleRL, achieving strong performance on knowledge-intensive benchmarks while providing the predictable scaling long available for pre-training but previously absent in RAG-RL.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation is a key technique for compressing large language models (LLMs), but most existing methods align representations at fixed layers or token-level outputs, ignoring how representations evolve across depth. As a result, the student is only weakly guided to capture the teacher’s internal relational structure during distillation, which limits knowledge transfer. To address this limitation, we propose Multi-Granular Trajectory Alignment (MTA) , a framework that aligns teacher and student representations along their layer-wise transformation trajectory. MTA adopts a layer-adaptive strategy: lower layers are aligned at the word level to preserve lexical information, while higher layers operate on phrase-level spans (e.g., noun and verb phrases) to capture compositional semantics. We instantiate this idea through a Dynamic Structural Alignment loss that matches the relative geometry among semantic units within each layer. This design is motivated by empirical findings that Transformer representations become increasingly abstract with depth, and is also consistent with linguistic views in which higher-level meaning emerges through the composition of lower-level lexical units. We further incorporate a Hidden Representation Alignment loss to directly align selected teacher–student layers. Experiments show that MTA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on standard benchmarks, with ablations confirming the contribution of each component.

Abstract:
Why do some languages like Czech permit free word order, while others like English do not? We address this question by pretraining transformer language models on a spectrum of synthetic word-order variants of natural languages. We observe that greater word-order irregularity consistently raises model surprisal, indicating reduced learnability. Sentence reversal, however, affects learnability only weakly. A coarse distinction of free- (e.g., Czech and Finnish) and fixed-word-order languages (e.g., English and French) does not explain cross-lingual variation. Instead, the structure of the word and subword vocabulary strongly predicts the model surprisal. Overall, vocabulary structure emerges as a key driver of computational word-order learnability across languages.

Abstract:
Project-Based Learning (PBL) is an important learning method that promotes understanding and acquiring practical skills through training learners through a project. However, effective PBL often requires sustained orchestration and collaboration, but existing LLM-based learning tools provide partial assistance without explicitly modeling these roles, and overly comprehensive help provided by LLM can reduce learner autonomy. We propose SimPBL, a multi-agent framework with an orchestrator agent that provides adaptive scaffolding from interaction logs and collaborator agents that support project work through boundary-aware collaboration. We conduct comprehensive evaluation to study the effectiveness of SimPBL, where we observe a 14% improvement in learner examination score. Results from extensive studies further highlights the ability of SimPBL to manage learning behavior and improve learning experience. Code and materials are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SimPBL-D5B8.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce texts that appear coherent and credible, even when their factual reliability is uncertain. This paper investigates whether such perceived credibility correlates with the pervasive use of generics—generalizations without explicit quantification. We introduce a text-level genericity score derived from clause-level annotations and apply it to argumentative essays produced by humans and LLMs. To analyze how generics are realized in discourse, we employ Rhetorical Structure Theory to examine coherence relations across varying levels of genericity. Results show that according to our genericity metric, human texts are less generic than LLM-produced texts. As regards discourse, higher genericity correlates with less structured, paratactic structures, while for some models coherence is maintained through elaboration relations. Our findings suggest that some LLMs maintain well-structured coherence even in highly generic texts, which might enable them to "camouflage" argumentative texts as informative, enhancing their perceived credibility and persuasiveness.

Abstract:
Cross-Tokenizer Knowledge Distillation (CTKD) enables knowledge transfer between a large language model and a smaller student, even when they employ different tokenizers. While existing approaches mainly focus on token-level alignment strategies, which are often brittle and sensitive to discrepancies between tokenizers, we argue that the method of aggregating tokens into more robust representations before distillation is of equal importance. In this paper, we introduce SRA ( S pan R epresentation A lignment for Large Language Model Distillation), a novel framework that reframes CTKD through the physical lens of Multi-Particle Dynamical Systems. SRA shifts the fundamental unit of alignment from tokens to robust, tokenizer-agnostic spans. We model each span as a cluster of particles and represent its state by its Center of Mass (CoM) - an attention-weighted average that captures rich semantic information. We leverage the concept of span centers of mass with attention-derived weighting to prioritize the most salient spans. In addition, we employ a geometric regularizer to preserve the structural integrity of the representation space and introduce aligned span logit distillation to enhance knowledge transfer across models. In challenging cross-architecture distillation experiments, SRA consistently and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art CTKD baselines, validating our physically-grounded approach.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) dominate the post-training landscape for mathematical reasoning, yet differ fundamentally in their reliance on expert trajectories. To understand the optimal way to harness these trajectories for maximizing performance, we propose the Plasticity-Ceiling Framework. This framework empirically grounds the post-training landscape by decomposing the final performance ceiling into the foundational SFT performance and the subsequent RL plasticity (i.e., the maximum improvement via RL). Through extensive benchmarking, we establish the Sequential SFT-then-RL pipeline as the superior standard, overcoming the stability and premature convergence deficits inherent in synchronized approaches. Furthermore, we derive precise scaling guidelines: (1) Transitioning to RL at the Stable or Mild Overfitting Regime of SFT maximizes the final ceiling by securing a robust SFT foundation with substantial RL plasticity; (2) Refuting the “Less is More” hypothesis in SFT-then-RL scaling, we demonstrate that Data Scale determines the primary post-training potential, while Trajectory Difficulty acts as a performance multiplier; and (3) The Minimum Validation Loss of SFT serves as a reliable indicator for selecting the expert trajectories that maximize the ultimate performance ceiling. Our findings provide actionable guidelines for extracting maximum value from expert trajectories.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Despite its success, RL faces fundamental challenges, including low sample efficiency and a strong dependence on the quality of the base model: while some models improve rapidly with limited RL updates, others require substantial training data to achieve meaningful gains. Recent studies suggest that the patterns of thinking tokens play a critical role in RL performance, and that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on datasets exhibiting desirable reasoning patterns can reduce reliance on base models and better prepare LLMs for RL. However, how to automatically discover such patterns across tasks remains unclear. In this work, we describe thinking token patterns with reasoning primitives and argue that initializing LLMs with diverse, high-quality primitives is crucial for stable and efficient RL training. We propose Tailor, a pipeline that automatically discovers such reasoning primitives and curates SFT datasets to prepare LLMs for RL. Extensive experiments on mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that Tailor consistently improves downstream RL performance, outperforming strong baselines, including methods with expert domain knowledge.

Abstract:
Overlapping calendar invitations force busy professionals to repeatedly decide which meetings to attend, reschedule, or decline. We refer to this preference-driven decision process as calendar conflict resolution. Automating this decision process is crucial yet challenging. Scheduling logistics can drain hours, and human delegation often fails at scale, which motivates us to ask: Can we trust large language models (LLMs) or language agents to manage time? To enable a systematic study of this question, we introduce CalConflictBench, a benchmark for long-horizon calendar conflict resolution. In CalConflictBench, conflicts are presented to agents round-by-round over a calendar year, requiring them to infer and adapt to user preferences progressively. Our experiments show that current LLM agents perform poorly with high error rates, e.g., Qwen-3-30B-Think has an average error rate of 35%. To address this gap, we propose PEARL, a reinforcement-learning framework that (i) augments the language agent with an external preference memory that stores and updates inferred strategies (e.g., attendee priorities, topic importance, time/location preferences), and (ii) optimizes the agent with round-wise rewards that directly supervise decision correctness, ranking quality, and memory usage across rounds. Experiments on CalConflictBench show that PEARL achieves an error reduction rate of 0.76 and a 55% improvement in average error rate compared to the strongest baseline.

Abstract:
With the generative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) reshaping the information ecosystem, the concern with the sociological validity of claim detection benchmarks is increasing. Current claim detection benchmarks predominantly treat claims as static textual artifacts, overlooking the sociological etiology of how information naturally emerges and mutates. In this paper, we propose an evolutionary paradigm that models claims as socially evolving entities. In specific, we introduce a socially generative framework for synthetic claim generation, a multi-agent simulation grounded in the Open Claims Model. By decomposing claims into context, utterance, and proposition, our approach enables the precise simulation of unmitigated propagation to capture truth decay, and intervened propagation with multi-auditor oversight for targeted generation. Furthermore, we propose the background-user-perspective (BUP) framework, which reformulates check-worthiness as a condition-dependent probability rooted in social environment. Experiments on our datasets verify the data quality and reveal how network topology and user attributes systematically shape veracity drift.

Abstract:
AI Clones aim to simulate an individual’s thoughts and behaviors to enable long-term, personalized interaction, placing stringent demands on memory systems to model experiences, emotions, and opinions over time. Existing memory benchmarks primarily rely on user–agent conversational histories, which are temporally fragmented and insufficient for capturing continuous life trajectories. We introduce CloneMem, a benchmark for evaluating long-term memory in AI Clone scenarios grounded in non-conversational digital traces, including diaries, social media posts, and emails, spanning one to three years. CloneMem adopts a top-down data construction framework to ensure longitudinal coherence and defines tasks that assess an agent’s ability to track evolving personal states. Experiments show that current memory mechanisms struggle in this setting, highlighting open challenges for life-grounded personalized AI. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/AvatarMemory/CloneMemBench

Abstract:
Human evaluation of machine translation is in an arms race with translation model quality: as our models get better, our evaluation methods need to be improved to ensure that quality gains are not lost in evaluation noise. To improve annotation quality, we experiment with a two-stage version of the current state-of-the-art translation evaluation paradigm (MQM), which we call MQM re-annotation. In this setup, an annotator reviews and edits a set of prior MQM annotations that may have come from themselves, another human annotator, or an automatic system. We demonstrate that rater behavior in re-annotation aligns with our goals, and that re-annotation results in higher-quality annotations, mostly due to finding errors that were missed during the first pass.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in code translation, yet their performance deteriorates in low-resource programming domains such as Fortran and emerging frameworks like CUDA, where high-quality parallel data are scarce. We present an automated dataset generation pipeline featuring a dual-LLM Questioner–Solver design that incorporates external knowledge from compilers and runtime feedback. Beyond traditional source–target code pair datasets, our approach additionally generates (1) verified translations with unit tests for assessing functional consistency, and (2) multi-turn dialogues that capture the reasoning process behind translation refinement. Applied to Fortran→C++ and C++→CUDA, the pipeline yields 3.64k and 3.93k dialogues, respectively. Fine-tuning on this data yields dramatic improvements in functional correctness, boosting unit test success rates by over 56% on the challenging C++-to-CUDA task. We show that the generated data enables a 7B open-weight model to significantly outperform larger proprietary systems on key metrics like compilation success.

Abstract:
Multi-turn Text-to-SQL aims to translate a user’s conversational utterances into executable SQL while preserving dialogue coherence and grounding to the target schema. However, most existing systems only regard this task as a simple text translation task and follow a short-horizon paradigm, generating a query per turn without execution, explicit verification, and refinement, which leads to non-executable or incoherent outputs. We present MTSQL-R1, an agentic training framework for long-horizon multi-turn Text-to-SQL. We cast the task as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) in which an agent interacts with (i) a database for execution feedback and (ii) a persistent dialogue memory for coherence verification, performing an iterative propose->execute->verify->refine cycle until all checks pass. Experiments on CoSQL and SParC demonstrate that MTSQL-R1 consistently outperforms strong baselines, highlighting the importance of environment-driven verification and memory-guided refinement for conversational semantic parsing. Full recipes (including code, trained models, reasoning trajectories, etc.) will be released upon acceptance to contribute to community research.

Abstract:
Prevailing safety alignment methods still leave Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to sophisticated jailbreak attacks. To bolster defenses, explicit reasoning mechanisms like Safety-oriented Chain-of-Thought (SCoT) have emerged, significantly enhancing robustness. However, this transparency introduces a critical trade-off: the exposed reasoning process itself becomes a new attack surface, risking the leakage of harmful information and revealing the model’s safety logic to adversaries. This paper directly confronts this dilemma, asking: Can we achieve the full benefits of deliberative safety without the costs of explicit reasoning generation? We propose Safety Reasoning Internalization to make the deliberative process in SCoT "available but not visible". This approach is grounded in a key theoretical insight: the corrective influence of an SCoT can be effectively approximated by a targeted, low-rank update to the model’s Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers. We operationalize this through Hierarchical Internalization of Adversarially-Guided Reasoning (HIAR), a layer-wise safety alignment framework that internalizes safety reasoning into an implicit computational pathway using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). HIAR enables the model to reach a safe conclusion within a single forward pass, entirely eliminating the need to generate vulnerable SCoT text. Extensive experiments on various LLMs demonstrate that HIAR achieves a 43% lower Attack Success Rate (ASR) against distinct jailbreak attacks compared to strong baselines.

Abstract:
Information-seeking is a core capability for AI agents, requiring them to gather and reason over tool-generated information across long trajectories. However, such multi-step information-seeking tasks remain challenging for agents backed by language models. While process reward models (PRMs) can guide agents by ranking candidate steps at test-time, existing PRMs, designed for short reasoning with binary judgment, cannot capture richer dimensions of information-seeking steps, such as tool interactions and reasoning over tool outputs, nor handle the rapidly growing context in long-horizon tasks. To address these limitations, we introduce PRInTS, a generative PRM trained with dual capabilities: (1) dense scoring based on the PRM’s reasoning across multiple step quality dimensions (e.g., interpretation of tool outputs, tool call informativeness) and (2) trajectory summarization that compresses the growing context while preserving essential information for step evaluation. Extensive evaluations across FRAMES, GAIA (levels 1-3), and WebWalkerQA (easy-hard) benchmarks on multiple models, with ablations, reveal that best-of-n sampling with PRInTS enhances information-seeking in open-source models as well as specialized agents, matching or surpassing frontier models with a much smaller backbone agent and outperforming other strong reward modeling baselines.

Abstract:
Story visualization requires generating a coherent sequence of images that collectively form a narrative, yet existing evaluation metrics and datasets often overlook visual continuity and narrative diversity. In this paper, we introduce the Visual Context-Aware Metric for Story Visualization, which uses large vision-language models to jointly assess caption fidelity and inter-image consistency, achieving Spearman’s correlation comparable to human agreement on two benchmarks. Also, to address the shortcomings of narrowly defined datasets with low diversity, we propose a diffusion-augmented evaluation pipeline that blends diverse and controlled narrative elements at adjustable ratios, producing challenging evaluation sets. By combining VCMS with this pipeline, we provide a scalable, human-aligned framework for evaluating story visualization models.

Abstract:
Propaganda is a widely used approach for shaping public opinion and disseminating misinformation in news media. While it has recently gained significant attention within the NLP community, research on fine grained propaganda detection remains heavily concentrated in high resource languages. To bridge this gap, we introduce KinyaProp, the first fine-grained propaganda dataset of its kind for Kinyarwanda and, to our knowledge, the first such resource created for a Bantu language. Using this dataset, we evaluate whether state-of-the-art LLMs can function as reliable annotators in a genuinely low resource and culturally grounded setting. Our results show that current multilingual LLMs do not reliably approximate human annotation behavior. Instead, they behave as conservative annotators whose performance is largely limited to lexically explicit cues, substantially under-identifying propaganda and exhibiting extremely low and unstable performance on discourse-level techniques. Our findings highlight an important limitation of recent successes in LLM based annotation reported for high resource languages, demonstrating that such results do not readily transfer to low resource settings, where scalable annotation would be most valuable. We release KinyaProp to support future research on fine grained propaganda detection and to enable more robust evaluation of multilingual models in underrepresented languages.

Abstract:
Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) aims to determine which relations hold between a given entity pair within a document. As a multi-label classification task, the most commonly adopted paradigm introduces a learnable threshold to distinguish positive and negative classes for an entity pair. Under this paradigm, existing losses decouple the optimization into independent positive and negative losses, which interact solely with a shared threshold. This leads to two inherent limitations: (i) threshold instability caused by conflicting gradient updates from the decoupled losses; and (ii) optimization bias exacerbated by the severe imbalance between limited positive samples and abundant negative samples inherent in DocRE, which makes the model more likely to predict that no relation exists.To address these issues, we propose the Adaptive-Threshold Global Loss (ATGL). Unlike prior work, ATGL integrates positive, negative, and threshold optimization into a unified logit space and explicitly enforces ranking constraints on their contributions to the objective. Furthermore, ATGL incorporates an imbalance-aware optimization mechanism, thereby effectively addressing the severe class imbalance in DocRE. Our ATGL serves as a general optimization objective that can be readily applied to different DocRE models. Experiments on four datasets show that ATGL outperforms other DocRE losses and achieves state-of-the-art results, while consistently improving the performance of existing DocRE models. Code is available at https://github.com/xhm-code/ATGL.

Abstract:
Writing is a cognitively demanding activity that requires constant decision-making, heavy reliance on working memory, and frequent shifts between tasks of different goals. To build writing assistants that truly align with writers’ cognition, it is necessary to capture and analyze the complete thought process behind how writers transform ideas into final texts. We present SCHOLAWRITE, the first dataset of end-to-end scholarly writing, tracing the multi-month journey from initial drafts to final manuscripts. The dataset traces nearly 62K LaTeX-based edits from five computer science preprints over four months and is enriched with fine-grained annotations of cognitive writing intentions. We demonstrate the value of ScholaWrite through three complementary contributions: (1) analysis of real-world writing behavior reveals that scholarly writing is highly non-linear and multi-intentional, blending rapid drafting bursts with cognitively sustained writing sessions; (2) evaluations of current large language models show that they struggle to provide meaningful support throughout the human writing process; and (3) models finetuned on SCHOLAWRITE demonstrate improved alignment with human writing workflows. SCHOLAWRITE underscores the value of capturing scientists’ cognitive writing process and provides actionable insights and resources for the development of future writing assistants.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) used for multiple-choice and pairwise evaluation tasks often exhibit selection bias due to non-semantic factors like option positions and label symbols. Existing inference-time debiasing is costly and may harm reasoning, while pointwise training ignores that the same question should yield consistent answers across permutations. To address this issue, we propose Permutation-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (PA-GRPO), which mitigates selection bias by enforcing permutation-consistent semantic reasoning. PA-GRPO constructs a permutation group for each instance by generating multiple candidate permutations, and optimizes the model using two complementary mechanisms: (1) cross-permutation advantage, which computes advantages relative to the mean reward over all permutations of the same instance, and (2) consistency-aware reward, which encourages the model to produce consistent decisions across different permutations. Experimental results demonstrate that PA-GRPO outperforms strong baselines across seven benchmarks, substantially reducing selection bias while maintaining high overall performance. The code is available on github (https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/PA-GRPO).

Abstract:
Video temporal understanding is crucial for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to reason over events in videos. Despite recent advances in general video understanding, current MLLMs still struggle with fine-grained temporal reasoning. While reinforcement learning (RL) has been explored to address this issue recently, existing RL approaches remain limited in performance on time-sensitive tasks. In this work, we propose MUSEG, a novel RL-based method that enhances temporal understanding by introducing timestamp-aware multi-segment grounding. MUSEG enables MLLMs to align queries with multiple relevant video segments, promoting more comprehensive temporal reasoning. To facilitate effective learning, we design a customized RL training recipe with phased rewards that progressively guides the model toward temporally grounded reasoning. Extensive experiments on temporal grounding and time-sensitive video question answering (QA) tasks demonstrate that MUSEG significantly outperforms existing methods and generalizes well across diverse temporal understanding scenarios.

Abstract:
Large Language Models enhanced with Retrieval Augmented Generation show strong potential in knowledge intensive tasks. However, they often encounter knowledge conflicts, where retrieved information contradicts the model’s internal knowledge or exhibits internal inconsistencies. Existing methods treat this as a simplistic binary choice, forcing models to blindly trust external contexts or rigidly rely on memory, resulting in unreliable predictions that swing between sycophancy and stubbornness. We argue that a more principled approach is to embrace contradictions as opportunities for deeper reasoning. To this end, we introduce Debate-of-Thoughts (DoT), a framework that transforms conflict resolution into an active deliberation process. DoT guides a single model through three phases: 1) hypothesis generation, which forms competing perspectives; 2) internal debate, where the model acts as both a proponent and a critic to stress test each view; and 3) adjudication, where a judge module evaluates arguments based on evidence and logical consistency. We implement DoT via two complementary strategies: inference time prompt chaining and supervised fine tuning. Experiments across multiple conflict benchmarks show that DoT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, while generating transparent debate transcripts that explain its decisions. By improving both accuracy and interpretability under knowledge conflicts, DoT establishes a more reliable paradigm for retrieval augmented generation systems.

Abstract:
Beyond training-time optimization, scaling test-time computation has emerged as a key paradigm to extend the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, most existing methods adopt a rigid Planning-before-Trial (PbT) policy, which inefficiently allocates test-time compute by incurring planning overhead even on directly solvable problems. We propose Planning-after-Trial (PaT), an adaptive policy for code generation that invokes a planner only upon verification failure. This adaptive policy naturally enables a heterogeneous model configuration: a cost-efficient model handles generation attempts, while a powerful model is reserved for targeted planning interventions. Empirically, across multiple benchmarks and model families, our approach significantly advances the cost-performance Pareto frontier. Notably, our heterogeneous configuration achieves performance comparable to a large homogeneous model while reducing inference cost by approximately 69%.

Abstract:
Infographics are composite visual artifacts that combine data visualizations with textual and illustrative elements to communicate information. While recent text-to-image (T2I) models can generate aesthetically appealing images, their reliability in generating infographics remains unclear. Generated infographics may appear correct at first glance but contain easily overlooked issues, such as distorted data encoding or incorrect textual content. We present IGenBench, the first benchmark for evaluating the reliability of text-to-infographic generation, comprising 600 curated test cases spanning 30 infographic types. We design an automated evaluation framework that decomposes reliability verification into atomic yes/no questions based on a taxonomy of 10 question types. We employ multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to verify each question, yielding question-level accuracy (Q-ACC) and infographic-level accuracy (I-ACC). We comprehensively evaluate 10 state-of-the-art T2I models on IGenBench. Our systematic analysis reveals key insights for future model development: (i) a three-tier performance hierarchy with the top model achieving Q-ACC of 0.90 but I-ACC of only 0.49; (ii) data-related dimensions emerging as universal bottlenecks (e.g., Data Completeness: 0.21); and (iii) the challenge of achieving end-to-end correctness across all models.

Abstract:
Video misinformation detection is often approached as a binary veracity classification problem, overlooking the complex reasoning required to explain how and why content misleads. Existing benchmarks fail to capture the diversity of manipulation strategies, such as AI-generated edits and out-of-context manipulation, and do not evaluate whether models can provide process-level justifications for their judgments. We address these limitations with MisVideoQA, a multi-turn benchmark designed to assess comprehensive understanding and reasoning in video misinformation analysis. MisVideoQA covers 12 fine-grained deception categories and evaluates models along six dimensions, progressing from perceptual attribution to intent and persuasion analysis. Recognizing that standard MLLMs struggle to sustain such structured, evidence-based deduction, we propose MisAgent, a Delphi-inspired multi-agent framework in which specialized agents collaboratively integrate multimodal cues with external evidence. Experimental results show that state-of-the-art multimodal large language models perform poorly on MisVideoQA, while MisAgent consistently improves reasoning accuracy and explanation quality. Together, our benchmark and framework establish a unified foundation for reliable, interpretable, and evidence-grounded video misinformation analysis.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are designed for discrete tokens, yet they operate in a continuous embedding space. Recent context compression methods exploit this property by encoding text into dense vectors for frozen LLM decoding. However, a key question remains unanswered: how does a frozen LLM interpret continuous vectors that encode complex semantics? We investigate this through controlled reconstruction experiments. Our analysis reveals a critical geometric property: compression encoders learn to produce vectors with L2 norms two orders of magnitude higher than standard embeddings. We show that this high-norm signal is causally necessary for the frozen LLM to decode compressed information. Based on this finding, we propose a landmark-based compression framework for long contexts. Our encoder uses bidirectional attention over landmark tokens. This design captures global dependencies and avoids semantic fragmentation from segment-based methods. Experiments on text reconstruction and four QA benchmarks validate our approach. At 4x and 16x compression ratios, our method outperforms prior soft compression baselines.

Abstract:
A hallmark of advanced artificial intelligence is the capacity to progress from passive visual perception to the strategic modification of visual information to facilitate complex reasoning. This advanced capability, however, remains critically underdeveloped in current Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs). The deficiency is often masked by evaluation metrics that prioritize final-answer accuracy, creating an illusion of competence where genuine reasoning is absent. Using the domain of geometric problem-solving as a precise instrument, we probe this issue through tasks that require constructing visual aids.To this end, we introduce VisAidMath , a challenging benchmark, and our novel Three-Layered Funnel Evaluation Framework. This framework moves beyond simple accuracy (ACCU) to scrutinize the generation of valid visual aids (PVA) and the soundness of subsequent reasoning steps (SPRS). Our extensive experiments on state-of-the-art models, including Doubao-Seed-1.6 and o4, reveal a profound “Reasoning Illusion”. We observe that high surface-level accuracy conceals a catastrophic failure in the models’ ability to produce valid visual aids or to reason from them. Our findings expose a fundamental schism between visual perception and logical deduction in modern LMMs. We provide a public evaluation platform on CodaBench and release the project homepage.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can, in principle, bootstrap language technologies for long-tail languages due to their pattern recognition capabilities. Yet in practice, without structured guidance, they produce narrow, unrepresentative samples that fail to cover the morphosyntactic space of typologically underrepresented languages.We propose Modular Typology-Informed Generation (mTIG), a prompting framework that transforms descriptive grammars into explicit control mechanisms that guide LLMs to generate typologically balanced synthetic data for downstream training. mTIG decomposes grammars into modular grammar slices, each targeting a specific morphosyntactic phenomenon (e.g., passive voice, causative morphology).Across three low-resource languages, mTIG improves typological entropy by up to 19% and yields a "student-beats-teacher" effect, where distilled models outperform the source LLM by up to +20 chrF in machine translation. These findings show that grammar-as-control can construct training corpora wherever formal linguistic descriptions exist.

Abstract:
The ability to model sparse and underspecified rewards, characteristic of human preferences, is fundamental to scaling Reinforcement Learning (RL). Current preference-based reward modeling largely relies on verifiable rewards, where human-annotated labels define rule-based signals. However, these methods face a fundamental bottleneck we term the Matryoshka Doll Problem: a recursive dependency where each reward verifier requires a meta-verifier, leading to continuous and costly dependence on human annotation. In this work, we propose Dual RM, which couples discriminative and generative reward models (DisRMs and GenRMs) under a non-parametric meta-reward. Rather than verifying the correctness of GenRM’s reasoning, the meta-reward evaluates its practical impact on response quality. Specifically, GenRM identifies multi-dimensional evaluation rubrics and iteratively refines the response, while DisRM quantifies the quality shifts induced by each rubric. Furthermore, we implement rubric-based test-time scaling to improve sample efficiency and preference alignment under both DPO and GRPO. Our experiments demonstrate that Dual RM achieves strong performance across major preference benchmarks. Notably, even when trained exclusively on language modality, it exhibits robust cross-modal transfer on Omni-RewardBench.

Abstract:
Merging multiple Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) experts into a single backbone is a promising approach for efficient multi-task deployment. While existing methods strive to alleviate interference via weight interpolation or subspace alignment, they rest upon the implicit assumption that all LoRA matrices contribute constructively to the merged model. In this paper, we uncover a critical bottleneck in current merging paradigms: the existence of negative modules —specific LoRA layers that inherently degrade global performance upon merging. We propose E volutionary N egative M odule P runing ( ENMP ), a plug-and-play LoRA pruning method to locate and exclude these detrimental modules prior to merging. By leveraging an evolutionary search strategy, ENMP effectively navigates the discrete, non-differentiable landscape of module selection to identify optimal pruning configurations. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that ENMP consistently boosts the performance of existing merging algorithms, achieving a new state-of-the-art across both language and vision domains. Code is available at https://github.com/CaoAnda/ENMP-LoRAMerging.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved code-generation capabilities, particularly through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for private libraries. While RAG leverages API documentation to address the scarcity of private code corpora, its performance critically depends on the quality of retrieved examples. Existing approaches often overlook the intrinsic characteristics of these examples, particularly how factors such as complexity, readability, and correctness impact their effectiveness. In this study, we systematically investigate these three critical aspects—complexity, readability, and correctness—and find that optimal examples should exhibit moderate complexity, semantic correctness, and step-by-step execution patterns. Based on these findings, we propose ComboPrompt, a novel example enhancement method that strategically combines existing API examples to improve complexity, refines code structure for readability, and incorporates automated validation ensuring correctness. Extensive evaluations across five private library benchmarks and different LLMs demonstrate that ComboPrompt achieves up to 22% accuracy improvement over baseline approaches. Code is available at [Anonymous Github](https://github.com/FireAndWin/ComboPrompt_ExampleQualityMatters).

Abstract:
Cultural alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for producing contextually aware, respectful, and trustworthy outputs. Without it, models risk generating stereotyped, insensitive, or misleading responses that fail to reflect cultural diversity w.r.t Helpful, Harmless, and Honest (HHH) paradigm. Existing benchmarks represent early steps toward cultural alignment; yet, no benchmarks currently enables systematic evaluation of cultural alignment in line with UNESCO’s principles of cultural diversity w.r.t HHH paradigm. Therefore, to address this gap, we built Align-Cultura, two-stage pipeline for cultural alignment. Stage I constructs CULTURAX, the HHH-English dataset grounded in the UNESCO cultural taxonomy, through Query Construction, which reclassifies prompts, expands underrepresented domains (or labels), and prevents data leakage with SimHash. Then, Response Generation pairs prompts with culturally grounded responses via two-stage rejection sampling. The final dataset contains 1,500 samples spanning 30 subdomains of tangible and intangible cultural forms. Stage II benchmarks CULTURAX on general-purpose models, culturally fine-tuned models, and open-weight LLMs (Qwen3-8B and DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B). Empirically, culturally fine-tuned models improve joint HHH by 4%–6%, reduce cultural failures by 18%, achieve 10%–12% efficiency gains, and limit leakage to 0.3%.

Abstract:
Detecting LLM-generated code is crucial for ensuring software provenance, security, reliability, and licensing compliance. Existing training-free detectors, mostly adapted from text-based methods, rely on global statistics of the Token Perplexity Sequence (TPS) and struggle with code. We reveal a key insight: despite the convergence of global statistics, LLM-generated and human-written code differ fundamentally in their local TPS dynamics: the former shows narrow transient spikes while the latter exhibits broad sustained fluctuations. To capture this distinction, we introduce CodeRipple, a novel training-free detection framework that employs wavelet analysis to characterize TPS morphology across scales. It jointly leverages the Stationary Wavelet Transform to model fluctuation shape and the Discrete Wavelet Transform to quantify cross-scale energy distribution. Evaluated on three challenging benchmarks spanning diverse programming languages, multiple generating LLMs, and various evasion strategies, CodeRipple consistently outperforms existing training-free methods, demonstrating its superior effectiveness and generalizability without any model training. Code available at: https://github.com/yaoxingyu77/CodeRipple.

Abstract:
Embedding fusion has become a widely adopted technique for enhancing performance across various NLP tasks. While prior research suggests that different layers of language models encode distinct representations and that pooling strategies influence performance, there is a lack of systematic analysis regarding the empirical efficacy of these differences or the impact of combining embeddings from multiple models. This study provides a rigorous, empirical evaluation of layer-wise fusion strategies to determine their actual contribution to classification performance. Our findings reveal that the effectiveness of individual layers is more dependent on dataset characteristics than on the model architecture itself. Furthermore, we demonstrate that fusing embeddings from multiple models yields more robust and consistent representations across tasks, with the influence of any single model diminishing as the number of integrated models increases. Notably, experiments on low-resource datasets show that embedding fusion provides particularly significant gains when training data is scarce, highlighting its robustness and adaptability in data-constrained environments. We also analyze the trade-off between performance gains and computational overhead, and discuss which fusion configurations provide the best balance between stability and efficiency.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning the bias terms of large language models (LLMs) has the potential to achieve unprecedented parameter efficiency while maintaining competitive performance, particularly in low-data regimes. However, the link between fine-tuning different bias terms (i.e., b q , b k , b v in the query, key, or value projections) and downstream performance remains largely unclear to date. In this paper, we investigate the link between fine-tuning b q , b k , b v with the performance of the downstream task. Our key finding is that directly fine-tuning b v generally leads to higher downstream performance in low-data regimes, in comparison to b q and b k . We extensively evaluate this unique property across a wide range of LLMs spanning encoder-only and decoder-only architectures up to 6.7B parameters (including bias-free LLMs). Our results provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of directly fine-tuning b v across various downstream tasks. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/whubaichuan/BEFT.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) is a cornerstone for scaling LLMs, yet its training dynamics remain poorly understood, often leading to sub-optimal specialization. Moving beyond static routing, we present a systematic study of the MoE lifecycle using Helmholtz Free Energyand Router Entropy. We identify a universal Three-Stage Phase Transition—Exploration, Symmetry Breaking, and Stabilization—marked by an Energy Climb and Plateau. This reflects Frustrated Exploration, caused by structural interference between specialization drives and uniformity constraints. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Aware Routing (UAR), which aligns routing with the model’s epistemic state via: (1) Evidence-Triggered Expansion, increasing active experts for high-energy tokens, and (2) Epistemic Masking, applying load-balancing only in high-uncertainty regimes to shield mature experts. Experiments confirm UAR reduces perplexity and improves expert distinctiveness, offering a principled path toward thermodynamically aligned computation.

Abstract:
Psychiatric interviewing is a strategic, goal-oriented interaction that requires proactively steering the conversation to elicit latent information. However, existing methods often degenerate into rigid interrogation or aimless chitchat due to a lack of strategic planning. In this work, we introduce S4, a comprehensive framework grounded in Speech Act Theory, modeling the interview as a unified process of internal strategy (Illocution and Perlocution) and external realization (Locution). We synthesize a large-scale dataset with fine-grained psychiatric speech act annotations. Trained on this data, S4Dial employs reinforcement learning driven by long-term therapeutic effects to optimize the strategic chaining of atomic acts, aiming to maximally elicit information and maintain patient engagement. Experiments demonstrate that S4 significantly outperforms baselines, validating the effectiveness of our effect-driven strategic modeling.

Abstract:
We model utterance production as probabilistic cost-sensitive choice over contextual alternatives, using information-theoretic notions of cost. We distinguish between goal-directed alternatives that realise a fixed communicative intent and goal-agnostic alternatives defined only by contextual plausibility, allowing us to derive speaker- and listener-oriented interpretations of different cost measures. We present a procedure to generate both types of alternative sets using language models. Analysing production choices in open-ended dialogue under both deterministic and noisy cost minimisation, we find that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives provides the strongest explanation of production choices. Uniformity-based costs show weaker overall predictive power, but their influence increases markedly when evaluated relative to goal-agnostic alternatives, consistent with listener-oriented accounts. More broadly, our study suggests that alternative-conditioned optimisation with LM-generated alternatives provides a principled framework for studying speaker and listener pressures in naturalistic language production.

Abstract:
The rapid proliferation of large audio models (LAMs) demands efficient approaches for model comparison, yet comprehensive benchmarks are costly. To fill this gap, we investigate whether minimal subsets can reliably evaluate LAMs while reducing costs and data redundancy. Analyzing 10 subset selection methods with 18 audio models across 40 tasks covering major LAM evaluation dimensions, we show that subsets of just 50 examples (0.3% of data) can achieve over 0.93 Pearson correlation with full benchmark scores. To understand how well these scores align with what practitioners ultimately care about—user satisfaction—we collect 776 human preference ratings from realistic voice assistant conversations, finding that both subsets and full benchmark achieve only 0.85 correlation with human. To better predict preferences, we trained regression models on these selected subsets, achieving 0.98 correlation—outperforming regression models trained on both random subsets and the full benchmark. This demonstrates that in regression modeling, well-curated subsets outpredict the full benchmark, showing quality over quantity. We open-source these regression-weighted subsets as the HUMANS benchmark, an efficient proxy for LAM evaluation that captures both benchmark performance and user preferences.

Abstract:
Embodied planning requires agents to make coherent multi-step decisions based on dynamic visual observations and verbal goals. While recent vision-language models (VLMs) excel at static perception tasks, they struggle in interactive environments. Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a natural way to address this limitation, yet online RL approaches suffer from costly interaction and sparse rewards in embodied settings. This paper introduces ORBIT, an On-policy Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) framework with offline rewards for EmBodIed Task Planning, that preserves the generalization benefits of RFT while addressing the challenges of costly interaction and sparse rewards, supported by solid theoretical guarantees. Our approach is evaluated on EmbodiedBench, a recent benchmark for interactive embodied tasks, covering both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios. Experimental results show that ORBIT achieves SOTA performance on EB-ALFRED, outperforming all closed-source and online-RL-based methods, while being substantially more efficient in training speed and computational cost, remaining robust to sub-optimal expert trajectories, and exhibiting strong generalization to unseen environments. We released all code and data at https://github.com/mail-taii/Reinforced-Reasoning-for-Embodied-Planning.

Abstract:
Slow-thinking Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities but often suffer from severe hallucinations due to an inability to recognize their knowledge boundaries. Existing Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches typically rely on outcome-oriented rewards, which can inadvertently reinforce fabricated reasoning paths when the final answer is correct. To address this, we propose Knowledge-enhanced RL, KnowRL, a framework that integrates factual supervision directly into the reasoning process. By decomposing the chain of thought into atomic facts and verifying them against the corresponding ground-truth knowledge, KnowRL performs fine-grained checks to encourage models to reason faithfully. Crucially, this process-oriented supervision teaches the model to identify its knowledge boundaries, learning to say "I don’t know" instead of fabricating answers when information is missing. Experimental results demonstrate that KnowRL effectively mitigates hallucinations—reducing the Incorrect Rate on SimpleQA by 20.3% for distillation-based slow-thinking models while maintaining strong performance on complex reasoning benchmarks like GPQA and AIME 2025. Furthermore, our method shows robust transferability to out-of-distribution tasks, indicating that the model learns a generalizable verification behavior.

Abstract:
Guard models are widely used to detect harmful content in user prompts and LLM responses. However, state-of-the-art guard models rely solely on terminal-layer representations and overlook the rich safety-relevant features distributed across internal layers. We present SIREN, a lightweight guard model that harnesses these internal features. By identifying safety neurons via linear probing and combining them through an adaptive layer-weighted strategy, SIREN builds a harmfulness detector from LLM internals without modifying the underlying model. Our comprehensive evaluation shows that SIREN substantially outperforms state-of-the-art open-source guard models across multiple benchmarks while using 250× fewer trainable parameters. Moreover, SIREN exhibits superior generalization to unseen benchmarks, naturally enables real-time streaming detection, and significantly improves inference efficiency compared to generative guard models. Overall, our results highlight LLM internal states as a promising foundation for practical, high-performance harmfulness detection.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models trained with reinforcement learning and verifiable rewards (RLVR) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, yet often overthink, generating redundant reasoning without performance gains. Existing trajectory-level length penalties often fail to effectively shorten reasoning length and degrade accuracy, as they uniformly treat all reasoning steps and lack fine-grained signals to distinguish redundancy from necessity. Meanwhile, process-supervised methods are typically resource-intensive and suffer from inaccurate credit assignment. To address these issues, we propose ATTNPO, a low-overhead process-supervised RL framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic attention signals for step-level credit assignment. We first identify a set of special attention heads that naturally focus on essential steps while suppressing redundant ones. By leveraging the attention scores of these heads, We then employ two sub-strategies to mitigate overthinking by discouraging redundant steps while preserving accuracy by reducing penalties on essential steps. Experimental results show that ATTNPO substantially reduces reasoning length while significantly improving performance across 9 benchmarks.

Abstract:
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are a promising paradigm for generalist robotic manipulation by grounding high-level semantic instructions into executable physical actions. However, prevailing approaches typically adopt a monolithic generation paradigm, directly mapping visual-linguistic features to high-frequency motor commands in a flat, non-hierarchical fashion. This strategy overlooks the inherent hierarchy of robotic manipulation, where complex actions can be naturally modeled in a Hybrid Action Space, decomposing into discrete macro-directional reaching and continuous micro-pose alignment, severely widening the semantic-actuation gap and imposing a heavy representational burden on grounding high-level semantics to continuous actions. To address this, we introduce Libra-VLA, a novel Coarse-to-Fine Dual-System VLA architecture. We explicitly decouple the learning complexity into a coarse-to-fine hierarchy to strike a training equilibrium, while simultaneously leveraging this structural modularity to implement an asynchronous execution strategy. The Semantic Planner predicts discrete action tokens capturing macro-directional intent, while the Action Refiner conditions on coarse intent to generate high-frequency continuous actions for precise alignment. Crucially, our empirical analysis reveals that performance follows an inverted-U curve relative to action decomposition granularity, peaking exactly when the learning difficulty is balanced between the two sub-systems. With the asynchronous design, our approach offers a scalable, robust, and responsive solution for open-world manipulation.

Abstract:
The ability of large language models (LLMs) to manage and acquire economic resources remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce Market-Bench , a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates the capabilities of LLMs in economically-relevant tasks through economic and trade competition. Specifically, we construct a configurable multi-agent supply chain economic model where LLMs act as retailer agents responsible for procuring and retailing merchandise. In the procurement stage, LLMs bid for limited inventory in budget-constrained auctions. In the retail stage, LLMs set retail prices, generate marketing slogans, and provide them to buyers through a role-based attention mechanism for purchase. Market-Bench logs complete trajectories of bids, prices, slogans, sales, and balance-sheet states, enabling automatic evaluation with economic, operational, and semantic metrics. Benchmarking on 20 open- and closed-source LLM agents reveals significant performance disparities and winner-take-most phenomenon, i.e. , only a small subset of LLM retailers can consistently achieve capital appreciation, while many hover around the break-even point despite similar semantic matching scores. Market-Bench provides a reproducible testbed for studying how LLMs interact in competitive markets.

Abstract:
Open-ended tasks, such as coding problems that are common in computer science education, provide detailed insights into student knowledge. However, training large language models (LLMs) to simulate and predict possible student errors in their responses to these problems can be challenging: they often suffer from mode collapse and fail to fully capture the diversity in syntax, style, and solution approach in student responses. In this work, we present KASER (Knowledge-Aligned Student Error Simulator), a novel approach that aligns errors with student knowledge. We propose a training method based on reinforcement learning using a hybrid reward that reflects three aspects of student code prediction: i) code similarity to the ground-truth, ii) error matching, and iii) code prediction diversity. On two real-world datasets, we perform two levels of evaluation and show that: At the per-student-problem pair level, our method outperforms baselines on code and error prediction; at the per-problem level, our method outperforms baselines on error coverage and simulated code diversity.

Abstract:
Uncertainty estimation is a promising approach to detect hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). Recent approaches commonly depend on model internal states to estimate uncertainty. However, they suffer from strict assumptions on how hidden states should evolve across layers, and from information loss by solely focusing on last or mean tokens. To address these issues, we present Sequential Internal Variance Representation (SIVR), a supervised hallucination detection framework that leverages token-wise, layer-wise features derived from hidden states. SIVR adopts a more basic assumption that uncertainty manifests in the degree of dispersion or variance of internal representations across layers, rather than relying on specific assumptions, which makes the method model and task agnostic. It additionally aggregates the full sequence of per-token variance features, learning temporal patterns indicative of factual errors and thereby preventing information loss. Experimental results demonstrate SIVR consistently outperforms strong baselines. Most importantly, SIVR enjoys stronger generalisation and avoids relying on large training sets, highlighting the potential for practical deployment.

Abstract:
Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation aims to identify emotions within a dialogue with multimodal data, including audio, visual, and textual features. While existing methods have made significant improvements, there are two fundamental limitations to be addressed. From the modality fusion perspective, current approaches treat all modalities as functionally equivalent during fusion, overlooking their distinct communicative roles and information capacities, in which text conveys explicit semantic meaning while audio provides paralinguistic cues. From the emotion label perspective, many works ignore the continuous structure of emotion characterized by psychological theory and apply uniform penalties regardless of affective proximity. To address these limitations, we propose EMART, EMotion-Wheel-Guided Audio-Referred Text Representation for ERC, specifically focusing on audio and text modalities. First, we propose a modality-aware fusion strategy capturing linguistic features from text as the primary source and audio as a complementary component. Secondly, we propose an emotion-wheel-guided supervised contrastive loss to encode emotional proximity based on Russell’s circumplex model. Experimental results on IEMOCAP and MELD demonstrate outstanding performance. The code is available at: https://github.com/DILAB-HYU/EMART.git.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) trained on unfiltered corpora inherently risk retaining sensitive information, necessitating selective knowledge unlearning for regulatory compliance and ethical safety. However, existing parameter-modifying methods face fundamental limitations: high computational costs, uncontrollable forgetting boundaries, and strict dependency on model weight access. These constraints render them impractical for closed-source models, yet current non-invasive alternatives remain unsystematic and reliant on empirical experience. To address these challenges, we propose the Controllable Alignment Prompting for Unlearning (CAP) framework, an end-to-end prompt-driven unlearning paradigm. CAP decouples unlearning into a learnable prompt optimization process via reinforcement learning, where a prompt generator collaborates with the LLM to suppress target knowledge while preserving general capabilities selectively. This approach enables reversible knowledge restoration through prompt revocation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAP achieves precise, controllable unlearning without updating model parameters, establishing a dynamic alignment mechanism that overcomes the transferability limitations of prior methods.

Abstract:
Vision Language Models (VLMs) are good at recognizing the global location of a photograph – their geolocation prediction accuracy rivals the best human experts. But many VLMs are startlingly bad at explaining which image evidence led to their prediction, even when their location prediction is correct. The reasoning chains produced by VLMs frequently hallucinate scene attributes to support their location prediction (e.g. phantom writing, imagined infrastructure, misidentified flora). In this paper, we introduce the first benchmark for geolocation reasoning chains. We focus on the global location prediction task in the popular GeoGuessr game which draws from Google Street View spanning more than 100 countries. We collaborate with expert GeoGuessr players, including the reigning world champion, to produce 800 “ground truth” reasoning chains for 500 query scenes. These expert reasoning chains address hundreds of different discriminative visual attributes such as license plate shape, architecture, and soil properties to name just a few. We evaluate LLM-as-a-judge and VLM-as-a-judge strategies for scoring VLM-generated reasoning chains against our expert reasoning chains and find that Qwen 3 LLM-as-a-judge correlates best with human scoring. Our benchmark reveals that while large, closed-source VLMs such as Gemini and GPT 5 rival human experts at prediction locations, they still lag behind human experts when it comes to producing auditable reasoning chains. Open weights VLMs such as Llama and Qwen catastrophically fail on our benchmark – they perform only slightly better than a baseline in which an LLM hallucinates a reasoning chain with oracle knowledge of the photo location but no visual information at all . We believe the gap between human experts and VLMs on this task points to VLM limitations at extracting fine-grained visual attributes from high resolution images. We open source our benchmark for the community to use.

Abstract:
Existing state-of-the-art symbolic music generation models represent symbolic music as a sequence of attribute tokens with fixed unidirectional dependencies. However, from the perspective of music theory, the attributes of a musical note are inherently a set rather than a sequence. Building on this insight, we propose Amadeus, a novel symbolic music generation framework that adopts a two-level architecture: an autoregressive model for note sequences and a bidirectional discrete diffusion model for note attributes. This design enables flexible attribute control and adjustable decoding speed during inference. To further enhance sequential modeling, we introduce the Conditional Information Enhancement Module (CIEM). We also constructed AMD (Amadeus MIDI Dataset)—the largest open-source symbolic music dataset to date—supporting both pre-training and fine-tuning. We trained two models of different scales, Amadeus and Amadeus-M, and conducted extensive experiments, demonstrating substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods across both objective and subjective metrics.

Abstract:
Current paradigms for empowering Large Language Models (LLMs) with multilingual capabilities rely heavily on massive instruction tuning. We challenge this view, proposing that the barrier is topological alignment, not data quantity. We introduce Hybrid Cross-Alignment (HCA), fusing a frozen NLLB encoder with a Qwen decoder via a closed-loop dual-adapter architecture. HCA utilizes a Source-Side Adapter to precondition encoder features and a Query-Residual Adapter to preserve generative stability, bridged by an adaptive gated cross-modal interface. Our core discovery is Universal Alignment Generalization.” We demonstrate that training HCA on a single language pair (German-English) unlocks state-of-the-art zero-shot transfer to dozens of unseen languages. Crucially, our Oracle” experiments reveal that this single-pair training recovers over 96.7% of the performance achievable by training on all available pairs. This proves that a universal, language-agnostic projection protocol exists. With a total inference footprint of 5.25B parameters, our model significantly outperforms larger baselines, surpassing TowerPlus-9B (+9.0 COMET on low-resource languages) and Aya-101 (13B). Furthermore, performance scales linearly with encoder size; upgrading from 600M to 1.3B yields immediate gains (+3.4 points on Gujarati) with minimal retraining cost.

Abstract:
Machine-translated benchmarks are widely used to assess the multilingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet translation errors in these benchmarks remain underexplored, raising concerns about the reliability and comparability of multilingual evaluation. We address two practical gaps: (i) how well automatic MQM-style error spans from LLM judges and a span-aware QE baseline (xCOMET-XXL) match expert human span annotations on benchmark translations, and (ii) how strongly translation errors (as opposed to source-side issues in the English original) explain accuracy drops on translated benchmarks. We find that span agreement is non-trivial on naturally occurring benchmark translations, and that target-side translation errors are consistently associated with measurable, percentage-point drops in translated accuracy even after controlling for English correctness and source-side anomalies.

Abstract:
With the widespread use of multi-modal Large Language models (MLLMs), safety issues have become a growing concern. Multi-turn dialogues, which are more common in everyday interactions, pose a greater risk than single prompts; however, existing benchmarks do not adequately consider this situation. To encourage the community to focus on the safety issues of these models in multi-turn dialogues, we introduce SafeMT, a benchmark that features dialogues of varying lengths generated from harmful queries accompanied by images. This benchmark consists of 10,000 samples in total, encompassing 17 different scenarios and four jailbreak methods. Additionally, we propose Safety Index (SI) to evaluate the general safety of MLLMs during conversations. We assess the safety of 17 models using this benchmark and discover that the risk of successful attacks on these models increases as the number of turns in harmful dialogues rises. This observation indicates that the safety mechanisms of these models are inadequate for recognizing the hazard in dialogue interactions. We propose a dialogue safety moderator capable of detecting malicious intent concealed within conversations and providing MLLMs with relevant safety policies. Experimental results from several open-source models indicate that this moderator is more effective in reducing multi-turn Attack Success Rate (ASR) compared to existed guard models.

Abstract:
Transformer-based embedding models suffer from quadratic computational and linear memory complexity, limiting their utility for long sequences. We propose recurrent architectures as an efficient alternative, introducing a vertically chunked inference strategy that enables fast embedding generation with memory usage that becomes constant in the input length once it exceeds the vertical chunk size. By fine-tuning Mamba2 models, we demonstrate their viability as general-purpose text embedders, achieving competitive performance across a range of benchmarks while maintaining a substantially smaller memory footprint compared to transformer-based counterparts. We empirically validate the applicability of our inference strategy to Mamba2, RWKV, and xLSTM models, confirming consistent runtime-memory trade-offs across architectures and establishing recurrent models as a compelling alternative to transformers for efficient embedding generation.

Abstract:
Reading stories evokes rich interpretive, affective, and evaluative responses, such as inferences about narrative intent or judgments about characters. Yet, computational models of reader response are limited, preventing nuanced analyses. To address this gap, we introduce SocialStoryFrames, a formalism for distilling plausible inferences about reader response, such as perceived author intent, explanatory and predictive reasoning, affective responses, and value judgments, using conversational context and a taxonomy grounded in narrative theory, linguistic pragmatics, and psychology. We develop two models, SSF-Generator and SSF-Classifier, validated through human surveys (N=382 participants) and expert annotations, respectively. We conduct pilot analyses to showcase the utility of the formalism for studying storytelling at scale. Specifically, applying our models to SSF-Corpus, a curated dataset of 6,140 social media stories from diverse contexts, we characterize the frequency and interdependence of storytelling intents, and we compare and contrast narrative practices (and their diversity) across communities. By linking fine-grained, context-sensitive modeling with a generic taxonomy of reader responses, SocialStoryFrames enable new research into storytelling in online communities.

Abstract:
The rapid growth of scientific literature has made it increasingly difficult for researchers to efficiently discover, evaluate, and synthesize relevant work. Recent advances in multi-agent large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong potential for understanding user intent and are being trained to utilize various tools.In this paper, we introduce Paper Circle, a multi-agent research discovery and analysis system designed to reduce the effort required to find, assess, organize, and understand academic literature. The system comprises two complementary pipelines: (1) a Discovery Pipeline that integrates offline and online retrieval from multiple sources, multi-criteria scoring, diversity-aware ranking, and structured outputs; and (2) an Analysis Pipeline that transforms individual papers into structured knowledge graphs with typed nodes (e.g., concepts, methods, experiments, and figures) and edges, enabling graph-aware question answering and coverage verification. Both pipelines are implemented within a coder LLM–based multi-agent orchestration framework and produce fully reproducible, synchronized outputs (JSON, CSV, BibTeX, Markdown, and HTML) at each agent step. This paper describes the system architecture, agent roles, retrieval and scoring methods, knowledge graph schema, and evaluation interfaces that together form the Paper Circle research workflow. We benchmark Paper Circle on both paper retrieval and paper review generation, reporting hit rate, MRR, and Recall@K. Results show consistent improvements with stronger agent models. We have publicly released the website:https://papercircle.vercel.app/ and code: https://github.com/MAXNORM8650/papercircle.

Abstract:
Frontier model progress is often measured using academic benchmarks that provide a limited view of performance on open-ended, economically consequential tasks in high-stakes professional domains where practical returns matter most. We introduce Professional Reasoning Bench (PRBench), a realistic, open-ended, and difficult benchmark of real-world problems in Finance and Law. We open-source its 1,100 expert-authored tasks and 19,356 expert-curated criteria, making it the largest public, rubric-based benchmark for both legal and finance domains. We recruit 182 qualified professionals, holding JDs, CFAs, or 6+ years of experience, who contributed questions inspired by their actual workflows. This process yields significant diversity, with tasks spanning 114 countries and 47 US jurisdictions. Our expert-curated rubrics are validated through a rigorous quality pipeline, including independent expert validation. Subsequent evaluation of 20 leading models reveals substantial room for improvement, with top scores of only 0.39 (Finance) and 0.37 (Legal) on our Hard subsets. We further catalog associated economic impacts of the prompts and analyze performance using human-annotated rubric categories. Common failure modes include inaccurate judgments, a lack of process transparency and incomplete reasoning, highlighting critical gaps in their reliability for professional adoption.

Abstract:
Training Large Language Models (LLMs) for multi-turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) – where models iteratively reason, generate code, and verify through execution – remains challenging for existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. Current RL methods, exemplified by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), suffer from coarse-grained, trajectory-level rewards that provide insufficient learning signals for complex multi-turn interactions, leading to training stagnation. To address this issue, we propose Group Turn Policy Optimization (GTPO), a novel RL algorithm specifically designed for training LLMs on multi-turn TIR tasks. GTPO introduces three key innovations: (1) turn-level reward assignment that provides fine-grained feedback for individual turns, (2) return-based advantage estimation where normalized discounted returns are calculated as advantages, and (3) self-supervised reward shaping that exploits self-supervision signals from generated code to densify sparse binary outcome-based rewards. Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that GTPO outperforms GRPO by 3.0% across diverse math reasoning benchmarks, establishing its effectiveness. GTPO also improves GRPO by 3.9% on commonsense reasoning and program synthesis tasks, demonstrating its generalizability to non-math domains. Importantly, GTPO incurs negligible overhead, ensuring its practicality for real-world scenarios.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential for automating the evaluation of natural language generation. Previous frameworks of LLM-as-a-judge fall short in two ways: they either use zero-shot setting without consulting any human input, which leads to low alignment, or fine-tune LLMs on labeled data, which requires a non-trivial number of samples. Moreover, previous methods often provide little reasoning behind automated evaluations. In this paper, we propose HypoEval, Hypothesis-guided Evaluation framework, which first uses a small corpus of human evaluations to generate more detailed rubrics for human judgments and then incorporates a checklist-like approach to combine LLM’s assigned scores on each decomposed dimension to acquire overall scores. With only 30 human evaluations, HypoEval achieves state-of-the-art performance in alignment with both human rankings (Spearman correlation) and human scores (Pearson correlation), on average outperforming G-Eval by 11.86% and fine-tuned Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct with at least 3 times more human evaluations by 11.95%. Furthermore, we conduct systematic studies to assess the robustness of HypoEval, highlighting its effectiveness as a reliable and interpretable automated evaluation framework.

Abstract:
Diffusion-based large language models offer a non-autoregressive alternative for text generation, but enabling them to perform complex reasoning remains challenging. Reinforcement learning has recently emerged as an effective post-training strategy for improving their performance; however, existing methods rely primarily on outcome-based rewards, which provide no direct supervision over the denoising process and often result in poorly structured reasoning that is difficult to interpret and inconsistently supports the final prediction. To address this limitation, we introduce denoising process reward , a process-level reinforcement signal defined over the denoising trajectory of diffusion language models. This reward is obtained by estimating the contribution of intermediate denoising intervals to the final task outcome, encouraging the model to favor reasoning trajectories that consistently guide generation toward correct predictions. We further propose an efficient stochastic estimator that reuses standard training rollouts, enabling practical process-level supervision at scale. Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach yields consistent improvements in reasoning stability, interpretability, and overall task performance.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is central to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it introduces a critical vulnerability: an imperfect Reward Model (RM) can become a single point of failure when it fails to penalize unsafe behaviors. While existing red-teaming approaches primarily target policy-level weaknesses, they overlook what we term systemic weaknesses cases where both the core LLM and the RM fail in tandem.We present ARES, a framework that systematically discovers and mitigates such dual vulnerabilities. ARES employs a “Safety Mentor” that dynamically composes semantically coherent adversarial prompts by combining structured component types (topics, personas, tactics, goals) and generates corresponding malicious and safe responses. This dual-targeting approach exposes weaknesses in both the core LLM and the RM simultaneously. Using the vulnerabilities gained, ARES implements a two-stage repair process: first fine-tuning the RM to better detect harmful content, then leveraging the improved RM to optimize the core model. Experiments across multiple adversarial safety benchmarks demonstrate that ARES substantially enhances safety robustness while preserving model capabilities, establishing a new paradigm for comprehensive RLHF safety alignment.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show significant potential in healthcare, prompting numerous benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities. However, concerns persist regarding the reliability of these benchmarks, which often lack clinical fidelity, robust data management, and safety-oriented evaluation metrics. To address these shortcomings, we introduce MedCheck, the first lifecycle-oriented assessment framework specifically designed for medical benchmarks. Our framework deconstructs benchmark development into five stages from design to governance, and provides a comprehensive checklist of 46 medically-tailored criteria. Using MedCheck, we conducted an in-depth empirical evaluation of 56 medical LLM benchmarks. Our analysis uncovers widespread, systemic issues, including a profound disconnect from clinical practice, a crisis of data integrity due to unmitigated contamination risks, and a systematic neglect of safety-critical evaluation dimensions like model robustness and uncertainty awareness. Based on these findings, MedCheck is both a diagnostic tool for existing benchmarks and an actionable guideline for a more standardized, reliable, and transparent approach to evaluating AI in healthcare.

Abstract:
Inference-time search can substantially improve LLM reasoning when tasks admit deterministic verification, but existing methods largely refine single trajectories and lack a reliable mechanism for composing partial solutions across candidates. We propose contract-checked graph editing: represent each candidate as an interface-typed reasoning DAG and validate every nontrivial edit with a deterministic structural gate (acyclicity, namespace closure, schema validity, terminal constraints) before invoking the verifier. The gate certifies runnability only and emits auditable rejection reasons; semantic correctness is determined solely by the verifier. Instantiated in Genetic Inference Search (GIS) with Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct under strictly matched token budgets (8K tokens), contract-checked grafting increases verifier-runnable recombination from 41.2% to 92.8% and improves accuracy over rStar (+6.1 on MATH, +9.1 on MATH L5) while using 42% fewer verifier calls. The same operators transfer across outer loops (beam, best-first, MCTS) and to structured generation and code, outperforming execution-guided beam search on Spider (+2.8) and improving multi-file code generation on HumanEval-MF (+9.2).

Abstract:
Deep research frameworks have shown promising capabilities in synthesizing comprehensive reports from web sources. While deep research possesses significant potential to address complex issues through planning and research cycles, existing frameworks are deficient in sufficient evaluation procedures and stage-specific protections. They typically treat evaluation as exact match accuracy of question-answering, but overlook crucial aspects of report quality such as credibility, coherence, breadth, depth, and safety. This oversight may result in hazardous or malicious sources being integrated into the final report. To address this, we introduce DeepResearchGuard, a framework featuring four-stage safeguards with open-domain evaluation, and DRSafeBench, a novel stage-wise safety benchmark. Evaluating across GPT-4o, o4-mini, Gemini-2.5-flash, DeepSeek-v3, and GPT-5, DeepResearchGuard improves defense success rates by an absolute 16.53% while reducing over-refusal rates to approximately 6%. Through extensive experiments, we show that DeepResearchGuard enables comprehensive open-domain evaluation and stage-aware defenses that effectively block harmful content propagation, while systematically improving report quality without excessive over-refusal rates.

Abstract:
In practice, rigorous reasoning is often a key driver of correct code, while Reinforcement Learning (RL) for code generation often neglects optimizing reasoning quality. Bringing process-level supervision into RL is appealing, but it faces two challenges. First, training reliable reward models to assess reasoning quality is bottlenecked by the scarcity of fine-grained preference data. Second, naively incorporating such neural rewards may suffer from reward hacking. This work proposes ReCode(Reasoning-Reinforced Code Generation), a novel RL training framework comprising: (1) Contrastive Reasoning-Process Reward Learning (CRPL), which trains a reward model with synthesized optimized and degraded reasoning variants to assess the quality of reasoning process; and (2) Consistency-Gated GRPO (CG-GRPO), which integrates the reasoning-process reward model into RL by gating neural reasoning-process rewards with strict execution outcomes, using execution correctness as a hard gate to mitigate reward hacking. Additionally, to assess the reward model’s discriminative capability in assessing reasoning-process quality, we introduce LiveCodeBench-RewardBench (LCB-RB), a new benchmark comprising preference pairs of superior and inferior reasoning processes tailored for code generation. Experimental results across HumanEval(+), MBPP(+), LiveCodeBench, and BigCodeBench show that a 7B model trained with ReCode outperforms the base version by 16.1% and reaches performance comparable to GPT-4-Turbo. We further demonstrate the generalizability of ReCode by extending it to the math domain.

Abstract:
Humor holds up a mirror to social perception: what we find funny often reflects who we are and how we judge others. When language models engage with humor, their reactions expose the social assumptions they have internalized from training data. In this paper, we investigate counterfactual unfairness through humor by observing how the model’s responses change when we swap who speaks and who is addressed while holding other factors constant. Our framework spans three tasks: humor generation refusal, speaker intention inference, and relational/societal impact prediction, covering both identity-agnostic humor and identity-specific disparagement humor. We introduce interpretable bias metrics that capture asymmetric patterns under identity swaps. Experiments across state-of-the-art models reveal consistent relational disparities: jokes told by privileged speakers are refused up to 67.5% more often, judged as malicious 64.7% more frequently, and rated up to 1.5 points higher in social harm on a 5-point scale. These patterns highlight how sensitivity and stereotyping coexist in generative models, complicating efforts toward fairness and cultural alignment.

Abstract:
Proactive streaming video understanding requires Video-LLMs to decide when to respond as a video unfolds, a task where existing methods often fall short due to their implicit, query-agnostic modeling of visual evidence. We introduce Response-G1, a novel framework that establishes explicit, structured alignment between the accumulated video evidence and the query’s expected response conditions via scene graphs. The framework operates in three fine-tuning-free stages: (1) online query-guided scene graph generation from streaming clips; (2) memory-based retrieval of the most semantically relevant historical scene graphs; and (3) retrieval-augmented trigger prompting for per-frame "silence/response" decisions. By grounding both evidence and conditions in a shared graph representation, Response-G1 achieves more interpretable and accurate response timing decisions. Experimental results on established benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our method in both proactive and reactive tasks, validating the advantage of explicit scene graph modeling and retrieval in streaming video understanding.

Abstract:
Multi-turn, long-horizon tasks are increasingly common for large language models (LLMs), but solving them typically requires many sequential model invocations, accumulating substantial inference costs. Here, we study cost-aware multi-turn LLM routing: selecting which model to invoke at each turn from a model pool, given a fixed cost budget. We propose MTRouter, which encodes the interaction history and candidate models into joint history–model embeddings, and learns an outcome estimator from logged trajectories to predict turn-level model utility. Experiments show that MTRouter improves the performance–cost trade-off: on ScienceWorld, it surpasses GPT-5 while reducing total cost by 58.7%; on Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE), it achieves competitive accuracy while reducing total cost by 43.4% relative to GPT-5, and these gains even carry over to held-out tasks. Further analyses reveal several mechanisms underlying its effectiveness: relative to prior multi-turn routers, MTRouter makes fewer model switches, is more tolerant to transient errors, and exhibits emergent specialization across models.Code: https://github.com/ZhangYiqun018/MTRouter

Abstract:
Logical reasoning is a key capability of large language models, yet current benchmarks focus almost entirely on tasks that just check basic logical consistency and overlook the reflective reasoning required for paradox detection and resolution. To fill the gap, we present ParaSuite, the first pipeline dedicated to paradox research that automates data synthesis, evaluation, and training. We introduce PARADOX, a synthetic, high-quality data spanning two difficulty tiers and three academic domains, accompanied by specialized evaluation metrics and solving algorithms. We propose ParadoxBreaker-7B, trained with Mutual-Information Guided Fine-Tuning and reinforcement learning step verify paradox reward(PAPO). Experiments demonstrate significant improvements in both paradoxical and general STEM reasoning.

Abstract:
Automated interaction with graphical user interfaces (GUIs) is central to General Artificial Intelligence yet remains challenging within Super App ecosystems, characterized by non-standard rendering and absent accessibility metadata. While GUI agents often rely on explicit accessibility trees or static imitation, they are less explored for dynamic environments marked by sparse feedback and implicit visual cues. We present GUI0, a framework synergizing autonomous data synthesis with dual-agent co-evolution. GUI0 establishes a domain-aware foundation model via synthesized corpora and employs curriculum-driven reinforcement learning, where a curriculum agent generates boundary tasks to optimize an actor agent.Empirical results demonstrate three key advantages: (1) State-of-the-art performance on the SuperAPP benchmark, outperforming Gemini-2.5-Pro and Claude-4-Sonnet; (2) universal efficacy across diverse base models, consistently yielding substantial improvements on both Qwen2.5-VL and GUI-Owl variants; and (3) robust zero-shot generalization to standard GUIs (e.g., +62.7% on ScreenSpot Pro).

Abstract:
Mobile GUI agents powered by LMMs can perceive screens and follow instructions, yet existing benchmarks largely target short, linear workflows and step-level accuracy, offering limited insight into long-horizon planning and decision-making under branching structures. We present DAC-Bench, a decision-aware benchmark with compositional tasks comprising 830 episodes and 11,345 action steps across 35 applications on Android and iOS. Tasks are organized into Sequential, Conjunctive, Conditional, and Hierarchical structures, reflecting real-world multi-step and branching interaction patterns. To complement standard step-level evaluation, we introduce weighted longest common subsequence to capture length-sensitive progress and decision accuracy for branch correctness. Evaluations across 7 diverse agents show substantial performance degradation compared to prior benchmarks, with success rates dropping below 5% on 6–8 step tasks and branch accuracy averaging 38%, highlighting challenges in conditional decision-making. By exposing these failure modes, DAC-Bench provides a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing decision-aware mobile GUI agents. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/YuqingZhangMirror12/DAC-Bench.

Abstract:
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong multimodal reasoning but frequently exhibit hallucinations and incorrect responses with high certainty, which hinders their usage in high-stakes domains. Existing verbalized confidence calibration methods, largely developed for text-only LLMs, typically optimize a single holistic confidence score using binary answer-level correctness. This design is mismatched to LVLMs: an incorrect prediction may arise from perceptual failures or from reasoning errors given correct perception, and a single confidence conflates these sources while visual uncertainty is often dominated by language priors. To address these issues, we propose VL-Calibration, a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly decouples confidence into visual and reasoning confidence. To supervise visual confidence without ground-truth perception labels, we introduce an intrinsic visual certainty estimation that combines (i) visual grounding measured by KL-divergence under image perturbations and (ii) internal certainty measured by token entropy. We further propose token-level advantage reweighting to focus optimization on tokens based on visual certainty, suppressing ungrounded hallucinations while preserving valid perception. Experiments on thirteen benchmarks show that VL-Calibration effectively improves calibration while boosting visual reasoning accuracy, and it generalizes to out-of-distribution benchmarks across model scales and architectures.

Abstract:
Code-switching (CSW) is the act of alternating between two or more languages within a single discourse. This phenomenon is widespread in multilingual communities and increasingly prevalent online, exposing large language models (LLMs) to mixed-language inputs. We present a systematic evaluation of LLM comprehension under code-switching by generating linguistically grounded CSW variants of established benchmarks (Belebele, MMLU, XNLI) across five typologically diverse languages. Our contributions are: (i) a controlled pipeline for producing CSW test sets that respect linguistic constraints on code-switching; (ii) a multi-model, multi-language analysis showing that inserting non-English tokens into English consistently reduces accuracy on comprehension and reasoning benchmarks, whereas embedding English into non-English contexts often improves it; and (iii) a mitigation study contrasting in-context learning (ICL) with fine-tuning. Across model families, ICL cues yield inconsistent, and sometimes negative, effects, while fine-tuning on CSW data provides modest but reliable gains, partially recovering accuracy under CSW.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated increasingly strong reasoning capabilities, achieving remarkable progress in knowledge graph question answering (KGQA). However, a key challenge in such systems is non-deterministic reasoning, where the model indecisively activates multiple semantically related knowledge graph edges for a given query, frequently leading to incorrect answers. To address this issue, we propose Diagnosing and Remedying Representation Deficiencies for Deterministic Reasoning in KGQA (DR2). DR2 identifies and localizes non-deterministic reasoning behaviors, uncovering the underlying semantic representation deficiencies in LLMs. Building on this diagnosis, we design abductive reasoning-based preference learning, which promotes fine-grained semantic discrimination and mitigates non-deterministic reasoning errors. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DR2 significantly outperforms several strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the widely used WebQSP and CWQ benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made substantial advances in reasoning tasks at the Olympiad level. Nevertheless, current Olympiad-level multimodal reasoning benchmarks for these models often emphasize single-image analysis and fail to exploit contextual information across multiple images. We present OMIBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Olympiad-level reasoning when the required evidence is distributed over multiple images. It contains problems from biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics Olympiads, together with manually annotated rationales and evaluation protocols for both exact and semantic answer matching. Across extensive experiments on OMIBench, we observe meaningful performance gaps in existing models. Even the strongest LVLMs, such as Gemini-3-Pro, attain only about 50% on the benchmark. These results position OMIBench as a focused resources for studying and improving multi-image reasoning in LVLMs.

Abstract:
Relation extraction (RE) identifies semantic relations between entities in text, with existing methods falling into two main paradigms: discriminative and generative. Discriminative models encode sentences and entities into relation representations and classify the most likely relation, whereas generative models directly produce relation labels through sequence generation. Although the latter have benefited from recent advances in large language models (LLMs), their performance remains limited by bottlenecks. In this work, we present the systematic investigation of how discriminative models can support generative RE. We propose the Discriminative-to-Generative (D2G) framework, which first leverages discriminative models to produce a top-k set of candidate relations, and then integrates this knowledge into generative models via in-context or prompt learning. Extensive experiments on five widely used RE benchmarks demonstrate that D2G consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, with notable gains on long-tailed relation classes.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has achieved remarkable success in unlocking the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Although CoT prompting enhances reasoning, its verbosity imposes substantial computational overhead. Recent works often focus exclusively on outcome alignment and lack supervision on the intermediate reasoning process. These deficiencies obscure the analyzability of the latent reasoning chain. To address these challenges, we introduce Render-of-Thought (RoT), the first framework to reify the reasoning chain by rendering textual steps into images, making the latent rationale explicit and traceable. Specifically, we leverage the vision encoders of existing Vision Language Models (VLMs) as semantic anchors to align the vision embeddings with the textual space. This design ensures plug-and-play implementation without incurring additional pre-training overhead. Extensive experiments on mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves 3-4 × token compression and substantial inference acceleration compared to explicit CoT. Furthermore, it demonstrates a competitive efficiency-accuracy Pareto exploration compared to other methods, validating the feasibility of this paradigm. Our code is available at https://github.com/TencentBAC/RoT

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely applied in various domains such as education and healthcare, making safety assurance crucial. Jailbreak attacks, a method used in red-teaming, can help evaluate and improve the defensive strategies of LLMs. However, existing jailbreak methods often overlook the semantic differences across categories of harmful questions, leading to inconsistent success rates and reduced overall attack effectiveness. We propose the first category-aware jailbreak framework, SHARP, which incorporates the semantic category of harmful questions into prompt generation. Trained on a verified jailbreak dataset, SHARP enables the model to learn category-specific semantic features and adaptively generate prompts that bypass safety mechanisms. The method combines two-stage LoRA fine-tuning, and DPO-based reinforcement learning to optimize both attack success and category alignment. Experiments show that SHARP significantly improves attack success rates and achieves better cross-category robustness compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines, providing an efficient and scalable tool for evaluating LLM safety.

Abstract:
Multi-task learning (MTL) enables joint learning over multiple tasks based on shared representations, but suffers from task interference issue during optimization. Existing works mainly focus on task balancing or probabilistic modeling but fail to address the issue since they struggle to learn sufficient representations for all target tasks. To address this, we propose a multi-task representation alignment (MTRA) framework to achieve task-specific alignment and self-alignment on the shared representations from a mutual information perspective. MTRA ensures that the learned representations contain task-relevant features while mitigating the negative effects of task-irrelevant features. First, we design a task-specific alignment objective to align the shared representations and task-specific representations with the expected targets of all tasks via information maximization. Besides, we design a self-alignment objective to eliminate task-irrelevant features via conditional information minimization. Experiments on two multi-task language benchmarks show that MTRA outperforms 13 representative MTL methods under the same settings, particularly under label-noisy and data-constrained conditions. Further analysis shows that the learned shared representations exhibit sufficient task informativeness and superior alignment properties.

Abstract:
Dense retrieval has become a core technique in applications like web search and retrieval-augmented generation. Despite their empirical success, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand semantics. To address this gap, this paper conducts a systematic investigation by introducing SURE , a benchmark for S emantic U nderstanding in dense RE trieval built upon the MSMARCO, NQ, and FiQA datasets. SURE characterizes semantic understanding in dense retrieval along three dimensions: semantic precision, semantic abstraction, and semantic equivalence. We evaluate ten representative models ranging from 110M to 8B parameters, including both general-purpose and domain-specific models. Results show that current dense retrievers struggle to distinguish fine-grained semantic differences across texts with varying information density, and to recognize semantic consistency under lexical paraphrasing. Moreover, larger models do not necessarily exhibit stronger semantic understanding, and diverse training data generally enhances semantic understanding on challenging retrieval tasks.

Abstract:
A recent study (CITATION) has shown that human sentence processing behavior, typically measured on syntactically unchallenging constructions, can be effectively modeled using surprisal from early layers of large language models (LLMs). This raises the question of whether such advantages of internal layers extend to more syntactically challenging constructions, where surprisal has been reported to underestimate human cognitive effort.In this paper, we begin by exploring internal layers that better estimate human cognitive effort observed in syntactic ambiguity processing in English.Our experiments show that, in contrast to naturalistic reading, later layers better estimate such a cognitive effort, but still underestimate the human data. This dual alignment sheds light on different modes of sentence processing in humans and LMs: naturalistic reading employs a somewhat weak prediction akin to earlier layers of LMs, while syntactically challenging processing requires more fully-contextualized representations, better modeled by later layers of LMs.Motivated by these findings, we also explore several probability-update measures using shallow and deep layers of LMs, showing a complementary advantage to single-layer’s surprisal in reading time modeling.

Abstract:
For constructing text embeddings, mean pooling, which averages token embeddings, is the standard approach. This paper examines whether mean pooling actually works well in real models. First, we note that mean pooling can collapse information beyond the first-order statistics of the token embeddings, such as second-order statistics that capture their spatial structure, potentially mapping distinct token embedding distributions to similar text embeddings. Motivated by this concern, we propose a simple metric to quantify such a collapse induced by mean pooling. Then, using this metric, we empirically measure how often this collapse occurs in actual models and texts, and find that modern text encoders are robust to this collapse. In particular, contrastive fine-tuned text encoders tend to be less prone to the collapse than their pretrained backbone models. We also find that the robustness of these text encoders lies in the concentration of token embeddings within each text. In addition, we find that robustness to the collapse, as quantified by our proposed metric, correlates with downstream task performance. Overall, our findings offer a new perspective on why modern text encoders remain effective despite relying on seemingly coarse mean pooling.

Abstract:
Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have achieved remarkable scalability, yet they remain vulnerable to hallucinations, particularly when processing long-tail knowledge. We identify that this fragility stems from static Top-k routing: routers tend to favor high-frequency patterns over rare factual associations. Consequently, "specialist experts" possessing critical long-tail knowledge are often assigned low gating scores and remain "dormant"—under-prioritized for specific tokens despite their proven causal importance on other inputs. To address this, we propose Counterfactual Routing (CoR), a training-free inference framework designed to awaken these dormant experts. CoR integrates layer-wise perturbation analysis with the Counterfactual Expert Impact (CEI) metric to dynamically shift computational resources from syntax-dominant to knowledge-intensive layers while maintaining a constant total activation count, effectively retrieving causally decisive experts via virtual ablation. Extensive experiments on TruthfulQA, FACTOR, and TriviaQA demonstrate that CoR improves factual accuracy by 3.1% on average without increasing the inference budget, establishing a superior Pareto frontier compared to static scaling strategies.

Abstract:
Evaluating the alignment between textual prompts and generated images is critical for ensuring the reliability and usability of text-to-image (T2I) models. However, most existing evaluation methods rely on coarse-grained metrics or static Question Answering (QA) pipelines, which lack fine-grained interpretability and struggle to reflect human preferences. To address this, we propose REVEALER , a reinforcement-guided visual reasoning framework for element-level text-to-image alignment evaluation. Adopting a structured ''grounding–reasoning–conclusion'' paradigm, our method enables Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to explicitly localize semantic elements and derive interpretable alignment judgments. We optimize the model via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using a multi-dimensional reward function that targets format compliance, localization precision, and alignment accuracy.Extensive experiments confirm that REVEALER achieves state-of-the-art results across four benchmarks. Notably, on EvalMuse-40K, it surpasses the strong proprietary Gemini 3 Pro and Training-based baselines with absolute accuracy gains of +4.2% and +13.3% , respectively. Ablation studies further demonstrate the efficacy of our method, contributing a cumulative 19.6% improvement over the base model.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to dynamically access external information, which is powerful for answering questions over previously unseen documents. Nonetheless, they struggle with high-level conceptual understanding and holistic comprehension due to limited context windows, which constrain their ability to perform deep reasoning over long-form, domain-specific content such as full-length books. To solve this problem, knowledge graphs (KGs) have been leveraged to provide entity-centric structure and hierarchical summaries, offering more structured support for reasoning. However, existing KG-based RAG solutions remain restricted to text-only inputs and fail to leverage the complementary insights provided by other modalities such as vision. On the other hand, reasoning from visual documents requires textual, visual, and spatial cues into structured, hierarchical concepts. To address this issue, we introduce a multimodal knowledge graph-based RAG that enables cross-modal reasoning for better content understanding. Our method incorporates visual cues into the construction of knowledge graphs, the retrieval phase, and the answer generation process. Experimental results across both global and fine-grained question answering tasks show that our approach consistently outperforms existing approaches on both textual and multimodal benchmarks.

Abstract:
Given a map description through global traversal navigation instructions, an LLM can often infer the implicit spatial layout and answer user queries by providing shortest paths. However, such context-dependent querying becomes incapable as environments grow larger, motivating the need for incremental map construction that builds a complete topological graph from stepwise observations. We propose a framework for LLM-driven construction and map repair, designed to detect, localize, and correct structural inconsistencies in incrementally constructed navigation graphs. Central to our method is the Version Control, which records the full history of graph edits and their source observations, enabling fine-grained rollback, conflict tracing, and repair evaluation. We further introduce an Edge Impact Score to prioritize minimal-cost repairs based on structural reachability, path usage, and conflict propagation. To properly evaluate our approach, we create a refined version of the MANGO benchmark dataset by systematically removing non-topological actions and inherent structural conflicts, providing a cleaner testbed for LLM-driven construction and map repair. Our approach significantly improves map correctness and robustness, especially in scenarios with entangled or chained inconsistencies. Our results highlight the importance of introspective, history-aware repair mechanisms for maintaining coherent spatial memory in LLM agents.

Abstract:
Automating scientific poster generation requires hierarchical document understanding and coherent content-layout planning.Existing methods often rely on flat summarization or optimize content and layout separately.As a result, they often suffer from information loss, weak logical flow, and poor visual balance.We present PosterForest, a training-free framework for scientific poster generation.Our method introduces the Poster Tree, a structured intermediate representation that captures document hierarchy and visual-textual semantics across multiple levels.Building on this representation, content and layout agents perform hierarchical reasoning and recursive refinement, progressively optimizing the poster from global organization to local composition.This joint optimization improves semantic coherence, logical flow, and visual harmony.Experiments show that PosterForest outperforms prior methods in both automatic and human evaluations, without additional training or domain-specific supervision.

Abstract:
Reasoning over long contexts remains a major challenge for language models, particularly when solving tasks that require integrating multiple facts in sequence or generalizing to new distributions. We argue that this difficulty stems from a lack of structural inductive bias. Recently, alternative frameworks have been proposed to explicitly encode contexts as ordered memory and perform iterative retrieval to construct reasoning chains. Despite the promising results shown in prior arts, they are still heavily reliant on intermediate chain supervision and fall short in showing emergent reasoning generalization in the presence of hard distractions in reasoning-in-a-haystack tasks. Furthermore, we discover that as the amount of distractions increases, traditional episodic memory reads suffer from ill-conditioning problems, which lead to inaccurate context retrievals. In this work, we formalize the motivation for necessary inductive bias in reasoning-in-a-Haystack tasks, propose inference-time memory update procedures mimicking the "identify and remove unnecessary and unrelated details" in constructively responsive reading, introduce staged training inspired by human conceptual understanding, and finally demonstrate the possibilities and limits of such framework in the weakly supervised scenario.

Abstract:
Ensuring that Large Language Models (LLMs) adhere to safety principles without refusing benign requests remains a significant challenge. While OpenAI introduces deliberative alignment (DA) to enhance the safety of its o-series models through reasoning over detailed “code-like” safety rules, the effectiveness of this approach in open-source LLMs, which typically lack advanced reasoning capabilities, is understudied. In this work, we systematically evaluate the impact of explicitly specifying extensive safety codes versus demonstrating them through illustrative cases. We find that referencing explicit codes inconsistently improves harmlessness and systematically degrades helpfulness, whereas training on case-augmented simple codes yields more robust and generalized safety behaviors. By guiding LLMs with case-augmented reasoning instead of extensive code-like safety rules, we avoid rigid adherence to narrowly enumerated rules and enable broader adaptability. Building on these insights, we propose CADA, a case-augmented deliberative alignment method for LLMs utilizing reinforcement learning on self-generated safety reasoning chains. CADA effectively enhances harmlessness, improves robustness against attacks, and reduces over-refusal while preserving utility across diverse benchmarks, offering a practical alternative to rule-only DA for improving safety while maintaining helpfulness.

Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce ReasonEmbed, a novel text embedding model developed for reasoning-intensive document retrieval. Our work includes three key technical contributions. First, we propose ReMixer, a new data synthesis method that overcomes the triviality problem prevalent in previous synthetic datasets, enabling large-scale production of 82K high-quality training samples. Second, we design Redapter, a self-adaptive learning algorithm that dynamically adjusts training each sample’s weight based on its reasoning intensity. This allows the model to effectively capture the complex semantic relationships between queries and documents. Third, we implement ReasonEmbed across multiple backbones of varying sizes, all of which achieve superior performance on reasoning-intensive retrieval tasks. Notably, our ReasonEmbed-Qwen3-8B model offers a record-high nDCG@10 score of 38.1 on the BRIGHT benchmark, which significantly outperforms existing text embedding models. We will fully open-source our created resource in ReasonEmbed to push forward the research advancement in this field.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to recognize fallacious reasoning in real-world interactions, despite strong performance on static fallacy detection tasks. We define this ability as fallacy awareness , the capacity to autonomously perceive and resist fallacies in dynamic, pragmatic contexts. To study this, we introduce ISFallacy , a large-scale Chinese benchmark of 50K interactive scenarios spanning six fallacy types, five social interaction settings, diverse role relationships, and personality traits. We further propose FATE , a two-stage evaluation framework that assesses fallacy awareness without explicit cues, combining natural dialogue responses and reasoning-based decisions. Experiments on five representative LLMs reveal a substantial gap between fallacy classification and awareness, with models particularly vulnerable to emotion-driven fallacies and scenarios involving cooperative or trust-based relationships. Deeper analysis uncovers a cognition–behavior gap and fragile internal representations underlying awareness failures. Our work establishes a foundation for evaluating and enhancing the robustness of LLMs against fallacious reasoning in interactive settings.

Abstract:
Web agents have shown great promise in performing many tasks on e-commerce websites. To assess their capabilities, several benchmarks have been introduced. However, current benchmarks in the e-commerce domain face two major problems. First, they primarily focus on product search tasks (e.g., "Find an Apple Watch"), failing to capture the broader range of functionalities offered by real-world e-commerce services such as Amazon, including account management and gift card operations. Second, existing benchmarks typically evaluate whether the agent completes the user query, but ignore the potential risks involved. In practice, web agents can make unintended changes that negatively impact the user’s account or status. For instance, an agent might purchase the wrong item, delete a saved address, or incorrectly configure an auto-reload setting. To address these gaps, we propose a new benchmark called Amazon-Bench. To generate user queries that cover a broad range of tasks, we propose a data generation pipeline that leverages webpage content and interactive elements (e.g., buttons, check boxes) to create diverse, functionality-grounded user queries covering tasks such as address management, wishlist management, and brand store following. To enhance agent evaluation, we propose an automated evaluation framework that assesses both the performance and safety of web agents. We systematically evaluate various agents, finding that current agents struggle with complex queries and pose safety risks. These results highlight the need for developing more robust and reliable web agents.

Abstract:
Recent advances in model distillation show that data from advanced reasoning models can effectively train smaller student models. However, standard practices discard incorrect reasoning traces—valuable, yet underutilized data. This paper addresses the critical question: How can both positive and negative distilled reasoning traces be effectively leveraged to maximize LLM reasoning performance in an offline setting? We employ a two-stage training recipe: first, Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on positive traces, followed by a refinement stage using both positive and negative traces. We find that a simple REINFORCE-style objective, which we term the Reinforcement Distillation (REDI) objective, outperforms established preference optimization methods like DPO and SimPO in this distillation context. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Notably, our Qwen-REDI-1.5B model, trained on just 131k traces from the open Open-R1 dataset, achieves an 83.1% score on MATH-500. Its performance matches that of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, a model trained on 800k proprietary data. This result showcases the remarkable data efficiency of utilizing previously discarded negative traces.

Abstract:
The ability to control LLMs’ emulated emotional states and personality traits is an essential step in enabling rich, human-centered interactions in socially interactive settings. We introduce PsySET, a Psychologically-informed benchmark to evaluate LLM Steering Effectiveness and Trustworthiness across the emotion and personality domains. Our study spans four models from different LLM families paired with various steering strategies, including prompting, fine-tuning, and representation engineering. Our results indicate that prompting is consistently effective but limited in intensity control, whereas vector injections achieve finer controllability while slightly reducing output quality. Moreover, we explore the trustworthiness of steered LLMs by assessing safety, truthfulness, fairness, and ethics, highlighting potential side effects and behavioral shifts. Notably, we observe idiosyncratic effects; for instance, even a positive emotion like joy can degrade robustness to adversarial factuality, lower privacy awareness, and increase preferential bias. Meanwhile, anger predictably elevates toxicity yet strengthens leakage resistance. Our framework establishes the first holistic evaluation of emotion and personality steering, offering insights into its interpretability and reliability for socially interactive applications.

Abstract:
The efficiency of long-video inference remains a critical bottleneck, mainly due to the dense computation in the prefill stage of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). Existing methods either compress visual embeddings or apply sparse attention on a single GPU, yielding limited acceleration or degraded performance and restricting LMMs from handling longer, more complex videos. To overcome these issues, we propose APB-V, a sequence-parallel framework with optimized attention that accelerates long-video inference across multiple GPUs. By distributing approximate attention, APB-V reduces computation and increases parallelism, enabling efficient processing of more visual embeddings without compression and thereby improving task performance. System-level optimizations, such as load balancing and fused forward passes, further unleash the potential of APB-V, delivering speedups of 12.72x, 1.70x, and 1.18x over FlashAttn, ZigZagRing, and APB, without notable performance loss.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a cornerstone of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). Yet, its efficacy is hampered by two fundamental limitations: semantic drift , arising from treating all update directions with equal importance, and structural incoherence , due to adapting layers independently, resulting in uncoordinated and suboptimal updates. To address these issues, we propose StructLoRA , a framework that tackles both limitations through a principled dual-component design: (1) an Information Bottleneck-guided filter that prunes task-irrelevant directions to mitigate semantic drift, and (2) a lightweight, training-only graph-based coordinator that enforces inter-layer consistency to resolve structural incoherence. Extensive experiments across large language models, vision language models, and vision models (including LLaMA, LLaVA, and ViT) demonstrate that StructLoRA consistently establishes a new state of the art, outperforming not only vanilla LoRA but also advanced dynamic rank allocation and sparsity-based methods. Notably, the gains are particularly pronounced in challenging low-rank and low-data regimes. Crucially, since the proposed modules operate only during training, StructLoRA improves performance with zero additional inference cost , shifting the focus of PEFT from mere parameter compression to a more holistic optimization of information quality and structural integrity.

Abstract:
Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) aims to identify both known and novel categories from partially labeled data, reflecting more realistic open-world learning scenarios. However, most existing methods rely solely on one-hot discriminative supervision, leading to overfitting on seen classes and poor generalization to unseen ones. Recent advances introduce large language models (LLMs) to incorporate external semantics, yet they often suffer from semantic–label misalignment and weak semantic integration during training. We propose GenDis, a Generative–Discriminative Dual-View Co-Training framework that unifies discriminative classification and semantic label generation within an LLM. Discriminative pseudo-labels guide the formation of a separable generative latent space, enabling semantically meaningful supervision for novel classes. To ensure consistency between the two views, we employ Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based alignment and a curriculum-guided, dispersion-aware pseudo-labeling strategy for iterative refinement. Extensive experiments on five GCD benchmarks demonstrate that GenDis substantially outperforms prior methods, validating the effectiveness of dual-view co-training with semantically enriched supervision. The anonymized repository is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/GenDis.

Abstract:
Anomaly detection (AD) plays a critical role in applications such as automated industrial inspection and medical image analysis. Empowered by the strong pre-trained vision-language model, CLIP, recent years have witnessed the emergence of several CLIP-based few-shot AD methods.Due to the overlap between the embedding distributions of normal and anomalous samples, many existing approaches introduce additional model training for more discriminative text embeddings.However, we demonstrate that such training is not necessary.Specifically, we find that this embedding overlap can be separated by introducing a ̲ Diff erence-guided vector for embedding ̲ Edit ing (DiffEdit).Based on this finding, we propose DE-CLIP, a simple yet effective framework based on DiffEdit, which directly edits text embeddings based on the textual and visual differences between normal and anomalous samples, resulting in more discriminative embeddings for AD.Extensive experiments on industrial and medical datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed DE-CLIP compared with existing baselines.For instance, on MVTec dataset, DE-CLIP achieves 96.6% and 96.7% AUROC on anomaly classification and segmentation, surpassing both training-based and training-free methods.In addition, we observe that introducing DiffEdit into other training-free baselines could also significantly improve their performance, highlighting the potential of DiffEdit to promote better AD.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) generate text that increasingly resembles human writing, the subtle cues that distinguish AI-generated content from human-written content become increasingly challenging to capture. Reliance on generator-specific artifacts is inherently unstable, since new models emerge rapidly and reduce the robustness of such shortcuts. This generalizes unseen generators as a central and challenging problem for AI-text detection. To tackle this challenge, we propose a progressively structured framework that disentangles AI-detection semantics from generator-aware artifacts. This is achieved through a compact latent encoding that encourages semantic minimality, followed by perturbation-based regularization to reduce residual entanglement, and finally a discriminative adaptation stage that aligns representations with task objectives. Experiments on MAGE benchmark, covering 20 representative LLMs across 7 categories, demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 24.2% accuracy gain and 26.2% F 1 improvement. Notably, performance continues to improve as the diversity of training generators increases, confirming strong scalability and generalization in open-set scenarios. Our source code will be publicly available at https://github.com/PuXiao06/DRGD.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in tasks such as code generation and mathematical reasoning. However, their potential to internalize structured spatial knowledge remains underexplored. This study investigates whether LLMs, grounded in locally relative human observations, can construct coherent global spatial cognition by integrating fragmented relational descriptions. We focus on two core aspects of spatial cognition: spatial perception, where models infer consistent global layouts from local positional relationships, and spatial navigation, where models learn road connectivity from trajectory data and plan optimal paths between unconnected locations. Experiments conducted in a simulated urban environment demonstrate that LLMs not only generalize to unseen spatial relationships between points of interest (POIs) but also exhibit latent representations aligned with real-world spatial distributions. Furthermore, LLMs can learn road connectivity from trajectory descriptions, enabling accurate path planning and dynamic spatial awareness during navigation.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) relies on reward models to align large language models with human preferences. However, RLHF often suffers from reward hacking, wherein policy learning exploits flaws in the trained reward model to maximize reward scores without genuinely aligning with human preferences. A significant example of such reward hacking is length bias, where reward models usually favor longer responses irrespective of actual response quality. Previous works on tackling length bias have notable limitations, these approaches either mitigate bias without characterizing the bias form, or simply assume a linear length-reward relation. To accurately model the intricate nature of length bias and facilitate more effective bias mitigation, we propose FiMi-RM (Bias Fitting to Mitigate Length Bias of Reward Model), a framework that autonomously learns and corrects underlying bias patterns. Our approach consists of three stages: First, we warm up by training a standard reward model which inherently contains length bias. Next, we deploy a lightweight fitting model to capture the non-linear relation between length and reward. Finally, we incorporate this learned relation into the reward model, effectively decoupling length from reward while preserving preference modeling capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that FiMi-RM achieves a more balanced length-reward distribution. Furthermore, when applied to alignment algorithms such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Best-of-N (BoN), our debiased reward model improves length-controlled win rate and reduces verbosity without compromising its performance.

Abstract:
In-context learning (ICL) leverages demonstrations to enhance the performance of large language models (LLMs). However, traditional ICL struggles with complex reasoning mainly due to superficial, example-level implicit imitation. To address these limitations, we introduce ThoughtICR, an automated Thought-level In-Context Reasoning paradigm that shifts from surface-level examples to more guidance-oriented thought patterns. Specifically, we first define atomic reasoning actions and construct thought patterns on small-scale seed data using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). During inference, we dynamically select appropriate thought patterns based on target problem attributes, providing explicit guidance for model reasoning. Thanks to its automated and strategic design, our method enables seamless plug-and-play integration with various post-training techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that our method improves performance across different model sizes and generalizes effectively across reasoning domains. Using only small-scale seed data, we achieve 80.6% accuracy on MATH and 62.5% on AMC, surpassing GPT-4o’s 77.2% and 57.5%, respectively. Moreover, compared to test-time scaling methods, our approach reduces computational costs by over 10. Our code is available at https://github.com/jinyangwu/ThoughtICR.

Abstract:
On-device deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently leverages Low-Rank Adapters (LoRAs) to support diverse downstream tasks under tight resource constraints. To address the limited storage capacity of mobile devices, recent works have explored model merging techniques to fuse multiple LoRAs into a single one. In practice, however, LoRAs are often delivered incrementally, as users request support for new tasks (e.g., novel problem types or languages). This scenario introduces a new challenge: on-device online continual merging, where the objective is to incorporate new LoRAs while preserving the performance on previously supported tasks. In this paper, we propose a data-free and computationally efficient strategy for selecting and merging LoRAs when a new one becomes available, assuming the device can store only a limited number of adapters. Extensive experiments across real-world tasks demonstrate the superiority of our approach compared to alternative strategies while adhering to the storage budget and compute limitations of on-device settings. The project page is available at: https://donaldssh.github.io/K-Merge.

Abstract:
We identify semantically coherent, context-consistent network components in large language models (LLMs) using coactivation of sparse autoencoder (SAE) features collected from just a handful of prompts. Focusing on concept-relation prediction tasks, we show that ablating these components for concepts (e.g., countries and words) and relations (e.g., capital city and translation language) changes model outputs in predictable ways, while amplifying these components induces counterfactual responses. Notably, composing relation and concept components yields compound counterfactual outputs. Further analysis reveals that while most concept components emerge from the very first layer, more abstract relation components are concentrated in later layers. Lastly, we show that extracted components more comprehensively capture concepts and relations than individual features while maintaining specificity. Overall, our findings suggest a modular organization of knowledge and advance methods for efficient, targeted LLM manipulation.

Abstract:
Attention matrices are fundamental to transformer research, supporting a broad range of applications including interpretability, visualization, manipulation, and distillation. Yet, most existing analyses focus on individual attention heads or layers, failing to account for the model’s global behavior. While prior efforts have extended attention formulations across multiple heads via averaging and matrix multiplications or incorporated components such as normalization and FFNs, a unified and complete representation that encapsulates all transformer blocks is still lacking. We address this gap by introducing TensorLens, a novel formulation that captures the entire transformer as a single, input-dependent linear operator expressed through a high-order attention-interaction tensor. This tensor jointly encodes attention, FFNs, activations, normalizations, and residual connections, offering a theoretically coherent and expressive linear representation of the model’s computation. TensorLens is theoretically grounded and our empirical validation shows that it yields richer representations than previous attention-aggregation methods. Our experiments demonstrate that the attention tensor can serve as a powerful foundation for developing tools aimed at interpretability and model understanding.

Abstract:
Long-context modeling is critical for a wide range of real-world tasks, including long-context question answering, summarization, and complex reasoning tasks. Recent studies have explored fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with synthetic data to enhance their long-context capabilities. However, the effectiveness of such approaches is often limited by the low diversity and factual inconsistencies in the generated data. To address these challenges, we propose LongMab, a novel framework that leverages a Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) rollout strategy to identify the most informative chunks from the given long context for sampling high-quality and diverse responses and constructing preference data pairs for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) training. Specifically, we treat context chunks as arms of MAB, select chunks based on their expected reward scores to input into LLMs to generate responses, and iteratively update these scores based on reward feedback. Both exploration and exploitation during the rollout process enable the LLM to focus on the most relevant context segments, thereby generating and collecting high-quality and diverse responses. Experimental results on both Llama and Qwen show the effectiveness of LongMab by achieving more than a 4% improvement on long-context reasoning benchmarks. All data and code will be released on https://github.com/NEUIR/LongMab-PO.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code generation by learning from vast code corpora, a fundamental semantic gap remains between their training on textual patterns and the goal of functional correctness, which is governed by formal execution semantics. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) approaches attempt to bridge this gap using outcome rewards from executing test cases. However, solely relying on binary pass/fail signals is inefficient for establishing a well-aligned connection between the textual representation of code and its execution semantics, especially for subtle logical errors within the code. In this paper, we propose CODERL+, a novel approach that integrates execution semantics alignment into the RLVR training pipeline for code generation. CODERL+ enables the model to infer variable-level execution trajectory, providing a direct learning signal of execution semantics. CODERL+ can construct execution semantics alignment directly using existing on-policy rollouts and integrates seamlessly with various RL algorithms. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CODERL+ outperforms post-training baselines (including RLVR and Distillation), achieving a 4.6% average relative improvement in pass@1. CODERL+ generalizes effectively to other coding tasks, yielding 15.5% and 4.4% higher accuracy on code-reasoning and test-output-generation benchmarks, respectively. CODERL+ shows strong applicability across diverse RL algorithms and LLMs. Furthermore, probe analyses provide compelling evidence that CODERL+ strengthens the alignment between code’s textual representations and its underlying execution semantics.

Abstract:
The rapid spread of misinformation on social media highlights the need for robust, automated fact correction frameworks. However, existing works rely on supervised learning from manually annotated claim-evidence pairs, which are scarce and prone to biases, limiting their generalization across domains. Moreover, these methods overlook semantic faithfulness in their correction process. To address these challenges, we propose Mask-to-Correct (M 2 C), a training-free, inference-only Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based framework that leverages diversity-aware masking to identify erroneous spans of claims and evaluate the faithfulness of corrections using retrieved evidence. However, the effectiveness of RAG heavily depends on the choice of retriever, which may vary across queries. To mitigate this, we further introduce M 2 C + , an ensemble-based framework that combines corrections across multiple rankers to reduce retrieval bias and improve robustness. Extensive experiments on the benchmark datasets demonstrate that our proposed frameworks consistently outperform all baselines, achieving up to 14% improvement in SARI scores, without using gold evidence.

Abstract:
Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) has emerged as a promising approach to reduce clinicians’ workload, yet existing systems are vulnerable to biases induced by spurious correlations across data, models, and evaluation pipelines. Such biases raise serious fairness concerns and may adversely affect patient care, making their mitigation critical in clinical settings. Leveraging causal inference to identify true cause-effect relationships can mitigate many biases and yield fair, reliable systems with clinically meaningful outputs. Existing surveys on RRG primarily emphasize deep learning approaches while overlooking the critical role of causality. This survey addresses this gap by analyzing bias across the RRG pipeline, formalizing RRG as a causal modeling problem, and reviewing representative causal techniques from the literature. Based on the level of intervention, we organize existing mitigation strategies into a three-tier taxonomy. We further examine commonly used public medical imaging datasets and evaluation metrics through a causal lens, revealing their biases and limitations in capturing causal alignment and clinical fidelity. To address these limitations, we advocate broader demographic coverage and causal-aware evaluation metrics to improve fairness and reliability, and identify important directions for future work.

Abstract:
Improving the exploration of reasoning is essential for advancing Large Language Models’ (LLMs) problem-solving performance. Current methods primarily rely on output-level stochasticity, which decode within fixed reasoning patterns of LLM and suffer from insufficient exploration. In this paper, we introduce adjusting attention temperature to directly modulate the model’s internal focus during reasoning, which enables a dynamic shift between exploratory and focused processing. We reveal that moderate adjustments preserve LLM’s reasoning capability while producing problem hardness-dependent benefits: higher temperatures facilitate solving complex tasks by encouraging wider exploration, whereas lower temperatures mitigate overthinking on simpler problems. Leveraging this insight, we propose a two-stage inference strategy: first, attention temperature scaling modulates the LLM’s reasoning patterns to diversify the reasoning traces; then, a difficulty-aware aggregation scheme is introduced to effectively identify the most reliable solution from the generated candidates. Extensive evaluations show that our method improves Pass@10 by 6.78–14.20% and aggregation accuracy by 9.74% across 7 reasoning benchmarks.

Abstract:
High-stakes domains such as finance, law, and biomedicine demand both accurate results and rigorous reasoning. Current reinforcement learning paradigms primarily rely on outcome-based rewards, often overlooking latent logical fallacies in intermediate steps. Leveraging the cognitive asymmetry where falsifying local errors is more efficient than generating global correctness, we propose RADO (Reasoning Audit-Driven Optimization). RADO introduces a specialized audit model augmented with external tools to identify local logical ruptures and calibrate reward signals. By integrating Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), our framework enables explicit supervision over reasoning paths. Experimental results demonstrate that RADO consistently improves final accuracy while significantly enhancing logical rigor in high-stakes domains.

Abstract:
Language models often struggle to follow multi-constraint instructions that are crucial for real-world applications. Existing reinforcement learning (RL) approaches suffer from dependency on external supervision and sparse reward signals from multi-constraint tasks. We propose a label-free self-supervised RL framework that eliminates dependency on external supervision by deriving reward signals directly from instructions and generating pseudo-labels for reward model training. Our approach introduces constraint decomposition strategies and efficient constraint-wise binary classification to address sparse reward challenges while maintaining computational efficiency. Experiments show that our approach generalizes well, achieving strong improvements across 3 in-domain and 5 out-of-domain datasets, including challenging agentic and multi-turn instruction following. We will open-source our code and data to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Scaling large language models (LLMs) improves performance but significantly increases inference costs, with feed-forward networks (FFNs) consuming the majority of computational resources. While Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures can reduce this cost through sparse activation, restructuring existing dense models into MoEs typically requires extensive retraining on hundreds of billions of tokens.We propose an analytical post-training framework that rapidly restructures FFNs into sparse MoE architectures using only a small calibration dataset. The method analyzes neuron activation patterns to partition neurons into always-active shared experts and conditionally activated routed experts, then constructs a router analytically from representative neuron statistics, enabling immediate deployment or optional lightweight fine-tuning. This approach applies both to dense models and recursively to existing MoE models for hierarchical sparsity.Experiments demonstrate up to 1.17× speedup in compute-bound scenarios with only minutes of processing and 2k-sample fine-tuning, outperforming methods requiring orders of magnitude more resources.

Abstract:
Post-hoc explanations provide transparency and are essential for guiding model optimization, such as prompt engineering and data sanitation. However, applying model-agnostic techniques to Large Language Models (LLMs) is hindered by prohibitive computational costs, rendering these tools dormant for real-world applications. To revitalize model-agnostic interpretability, we propose a budget-friendly proxy framework that leverages efficient models to approximate the decision boundaries of expensive LLMs. We introduce a screen-and-apply mechanism to statistically verify local alignment before deployment. Our empirical evaluation confirms that proxy explanations achieve over 90% fidelity with only 9.5% of the oracle’s cost. Building on this foundation, we demonstrate the actionable utility of our framework in prompt compression and poisoned example removal. Results show that reliable proxy explanations effectively guide optimization, transforming interpretability from a passive observation tool into a scalable primitive for LLM development. Additionally, we open-source code and datasets to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLM) often hallucinate, and while adding citations is a common solution, it is frequently insufficient for accountability as users struggle to verify how a cited source supports a generated claim. Existing methods are typically coarse-grained and fail to distinguish between direct quotes and complex reasoning. In this paper, we introduce Generation-time Fine-grained Provenance, a task where models must generate fluent answers while simultaneously producing structured, sentence-level provenance triples. To enable this, we present ReFInE (Relation-aware Fine-grained Interpretability Evidence), a dataset featuring expert-verified annotations that distinguish between Quotation, Compression, and Inference. Building on ReFInE, we propose GenProve, a framework that combines Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). By optimizing a composite reward for answer fidelity and provenance correctness, GenProve significantly outperforms 14 strong LLMs in joint evaluation. Crucially, our analysis uncovers a reasoning gap where models excel at surface-level quotation but struggle significantly with inference-based provenance, suggesting that verifiable reasoning remains a frontier challenge distinct from surface-level citation.

Abstract:
Community Notes, the crowd-sourced misinformation governance system on X (formerly Twitter), allows users to flag misleading posts, attach contextual notes, and rate the notes’ helpfulness. However, our empirical analysis of 30.8K health-related notes reveals substantial latency, with a median delay of 17.6 hours before notes receive a helpfulness status. To improve responsiveness during real-world misinformation surges, we propose CrowdNotes+, a unified LLM-based framework that augments Community Notes for faster and more reliable health misinformation governance. CrowdNotes+ integrates two modes: (1) evidence-grounded note augmentation and (2) utility-guided note automation, supported by a hierarchical three-stage evaluation of relevance, correctness, and helpfulness. We instantiate the framework with HealthNotes, a benchmark of 1.2K health notes annotated for helpfulness, and a fine-tuned helpfulness judge. Our analysis first uncovers a key loophole in current crowd-sourced governance: voters frequently conflate stylistic fluency with factual accuracy. Addressing this via our hierarchical evaluation, experiments across 15 representative LLMs demonstrate that CrowdNotes+ significantly outperforms human contributors in note correctness, helpfulness, and evidence utility.

Abstract:
Reliable confidence is essential for trusting the outputs of LLMs, yet widely deployed post-trained LLMs (PoLLMs) typically compromise this trust with severe overconfidence. In contrast, we observe that their corresponding base LLMs often remain well-calibrated. This naturally motivates us to calibrate PoLLM confidence using the base LLM as a reference. This work proposes two ways to achieve this. A straightforward solution, BaseCal-ReEval, evaluates PoLLM’s responses by feeding them into the base LLM to get average probabilities as confidence. While effective, this approach introduces additional inference overhead. To address this, we propose BaseCal-Proj, which trains a lightweight projection to map the final-layer hidden states of PoLLMs back to those of their base LLMs. These projected states are then processed by the base LLM’s output layer to derive base-calibrated confidence for PoLLM’s responses. Notably, BaseCal is an unsupervised, plug-and-play solution that operates without human labels or LLM modifications. Experiments across five datasets and three LLM families demonstrate the effectiveness of BaseCal, reducing Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by an average of 42.90% compared to the best unsupervised baselines.

Abstract:
Current critic-free RL methods for large reasoning models suffer from severe inefficiency when training on positive homogeneous prompts (where all rollouts are correct), resulting in waste of rollouts due to zero advantage estimates. We introduce a radically simple yet powerful solution to M ine in trinsic mast er y (Miner), that repurposes the policy’s intrinsic uncertainty as a self-supervised reward signal, with no external supervision, auxiliary models, or additional inference cost. Our method pioneers two key innovations: (1) a token-level focal credit assignment mechanism that dynamically amplifies gradients on critical uncertain tokens while suppressing overconfident ones, and (2) adaptive advantage calibration to seamlessly integrate intrinsic and verifiable rewards. Evaluated across six reasoning benchmarks on Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B base models, Miner achieves state-of-the-art performance among the other four algorithms, yielding up to 4.58 absolute gains in Pass@1 and 6.66 gains in Pass@K compared to GRPO. Comparison with other methods targeted at exploration enhancement further discloses the superiority of the two newly proposed innovations. This demonstrates that latent uncertainty exploitation is both necessary and sufficient for efficient and scalable RL training of reasoning models. Code is available at https://github.com/pixas/Miner .

Abstract:
Backchannels and fillers are important linguistic expressions in dialogue, but often treated as "noise" to be bypassed in modern transformer-based language models. Our work studies the representation of them in language models using three fine-tuning strategies. The models are trained on three dialogue corpora in English and Japanese, where backchannels and fillers are preserved and annotated, to investigate how fine-tuning can help LMs learn their representations. We first apply clustering analysis to the learnt representation of backchannels and fillers, and have found increased silhouette scores in representations from fine-tuned models, which suggests that fine-tuning enables LMs to distinguish the nuanced semantic variation in different backchannel and filler use. We also use natural language generation (NLG) metrics and qualitative analysis to confirm that the utterances generated by fine-tuned language models resemble human-produced utterances more closely. Our findings suggest the potentials of transforming general LMs into conversational LMs that are more capable of producing human-like languages adequately.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled strong performance in long-form writing, but current training paradigms remain limited: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) remains constrained by data saturation and performance ceilings, while Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR), though successful in verifiable domains like math and code, cannot be directly migrated to open-ended long-form writing due to a lack of ground-truths. To further advance long-form writing, we present Writing-RL: an Adaptive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning framework to advance long-form writing capabilities beyond SFT. The framework consists of three key components: Margin-aware Data Selection strategy that prioritizes samples with high learning potential, Pairwise Comparison Reward mechanism that provides discriminative learning signals in the absence of verifiable rewards, and Dynamic Reference Scheduling approach, which plays a critical role by adaptively adjusting task difficulty based on evolving model performance. Experiments on 7B-scale writer models show that Writing-RL effectively improves long-form writing performance over strong SFT baselines. Furthermore, we observe that models trained with long-output RL generalize surprisingly well to long-input reasoning tasks, potentially offering a promising perspective for rethinking long-context training.

Abstract:
Safety-aligned LLMs suffer from two failure modes: jailbreak (responding to harmful inputs) and over-refusal (declining benign queries). Existing vector steering methods adjust the magnitude of answer vectors, but this creates a fundamental trade-off—reducing jailbreak increases over-refusal and vice versa. We identify the root cause: LLMs encode the decision to respond (answer vector v a ) and the judgment of input safety (benign vector v b ) as nearly orthogonal directions, treating them as independent processes. We propose LLM-VA, which aligns v a with v b through closed-form weight updates, making the model’s willingness to respond causally dependent on its safety assessment—without fine-tuning or architectural changes. Our method identifies vectors at each layer using SVMs, selects safety-relevant layers, and iteratively aligns vectors via minimum-norm weight modifications. Experiments on 12 LLMs demonstrate that LLM-VA achieves 11.45% higher F1 than the best baseline while preserving 95.92% utility, and automatically adapts to each model’s safety bias without manual tuning.Code and models are available at https://hotbento.github.io/LLM-VA-Web/.

Abstract:
Structured pruning offers a hardware-friendly approach for efficient LLM inference. Early static methods determine fixed subnetworks through offline calibration, suffering from performance degradation and calibration sensitivity. Recent methods explore input-adaptive pruning by selecting a subset of tokens as probes to estimate hidden activations for online pruning decisions.However, existing probe selection strategies fail to identify outlier-triggering tokens, and uniform layer-wise sparsity misaligns with heterogeneous outlier distributions, leading to critical channels being incorrectly pruned. Therefore, we propose OCP (Outlier-Centric Probing for structured pruning), a principled framework that prioritizes capturing outlier-triggering tokens rather than reconstructing full hidden distributions. Specifically, OCP includes three key components: (1) sensitivity-weighted probing for FFN layers that identifies outlier patterns via precomputed weight aggregations, (2) attention-accumulated probing that leverages preceding attention matrices to identify salient tokens, and (3) online adaptive sparsity allocation that dynamically adjusts layer-wise pruning based on history-guided outlier statistics. Extensive experiments on LLaMA2, LLaMA3, and OPT demonstrate that OCP consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across benchmarks, achieving up to 25% perplexity reduction at 1.6 × speedup.

Abstract:
Deep research is emerging as a representative long-horizon task for large language model (LLM) agents. However, long trajectories in deep research often exceed model context limits, compressing token budgets for both evidence collection and report writing, and preventing effective test-time scaling. We introduce FS-Researcher, a file-system-based, dual-agent framework that scales deep research beyond the context window via a persistent workspace. Specifically, a Context Builder agent acts as a librarian which browses the internet, writes structured notes, and archives raw sources into a hierarchical knowledge base that can grow far beyond context length. A Report Writer agent then composes the final report section by section, treating the knowledge base as the source of facts. In this framework, the file system serves as a durable external memory and a shared coordination medium across agents and sessions, enabling iterative refinement beyond the context window. Experiments on two open-ended benchmarks (DeepResearch Bench and DeepConsult) show that FS-Researcher achieves state-of-the-art report quality across different backbone models. Further analyses demonstrate a positive correlation between final report quality and the computation allocated to the Context Builder, validating effective test-time scaling under the file-system paradigm. The code and data are open-sourced at https://github.com/Ignoramus0817/FS-Researcher.

Abstract:
As large language models become standard backends for content generation, practical provenance increasingly requires multi-bit watermarking. In provider-internal deployments, a key requirement is message symmetry: the message itself should not systematically affect either text quality or verification outcomes.Vocabulary-partition watermarks can break message symmetry in low-entropy decoding: some messages are assigned most of the probability mass, while others are forced to use tail tokens. This makes embedding quality and message decoding accuracy message-dependent.We propose QuantileMark, a white-box multi-bit watermark that embeds messages within the continuous cumulative probability interval [0, 1) .At each step, QuantileMark partitions this interval into M equal-mass bins and samples strictly from the bin assigned to the target symbol, ensuring a fixed 1/M probability budget regardless of context entropy.For detection, the verifier reconstructs the same partition under teacher forcing, computes posteriors over latent bins, and aggregates evidence for verification.We prove message-unbiasedness, a property ensuring that the base distribution is recovered when averaging over messages. This provides a theoretical foundation for generation-side symmetry, while the equal-mass design additionally promotes uniform evidence strength across messages on the detection side.Empirical results on C4 continuation and LFQA show improved multi-bit recovery and detection robustness over strong baselines, with negligible impact on generation quality.

Abstract:
Shortcuts such as APIs and deep-links have emerged as efficient complements to flexible GUI operations, fostering a promising hybrid paradigm for MLLM-based mobile automation. However, systematic evaluation of GUI–shortcut hybrid agents remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce MAS-Bench, a benchmark that pioneers the evaluation of GUI-shortcut hybrid agents with a specific focus on the mobile domain. Beyond merely using predefined shortcuts, MAS-Bench assesses an agent’s capability to autonomously generate shortcuts by discovering and creating reusable, low-cost workflows. It features 139 complex tasks across 11 real-world applications, a knowledge base of 88 predefined shortcuts (APIs, deep-links, RPA scripts), and 9 evaluation metrics. Experiments demonstrate that hybrid agents achieve up to 68.3% success rate and 39% greater execution efficiency than GUI-only counterparts. Furthermore, our evaluation framework effectively reveals the quality gap between predefined and agent-generated shortcuts, validating its capability to assess shortcut generation methods. MAS-Bench addresses the lack of systematic benchmarks for GUI-shortcut hybrid mobile agents, providing a foundational platform for future advancements in creating more efficient and robust intelligent agents.

Abstract:
With the widespread deployment of public large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, protecting user prompt privacy has become an increasingly critical issue. Existing privacy-preserving inference methods sacrifice either utility or efficiency, and often require model-specific modifications that limit their compatibility. In this paper, we propose SharedRequest, a model-agnostic framework for privacy-preserving LLM inference that reformulates privacy protection at the batch level rather than the individual-prompt level. The key idea is to obscure sensitive information by mixing original prompts with noisy variants, while grouping semantically equivalent instructions to amortize the inference cost over a large batch of queries with minimal impact on LLM response quality. This design is independent of the LLM architecture, requiring no access to model parameters or architectural modification. Empirical results demonstrate that SharedRequest achieves over 20% higher utility compared to prior differential privacy baselines, and its shared-prompt mechanism reduces query cost by up to 5× compared to non-batched inference.

Abstract:
While agent evaluation has shifted toward long-horizon tasks, most benchmarks still emphasize local, step-level reasoning rather than the global constrained optimization (e.g., time and financial budgets) that demands genuine planning ability. Meanwhile, existing LLM planning benchmarks underrepresent the active information gathering and fine-grained local constraints typical of real-world settings. To address this, we introduce DeepPlanning, a challenging benchmark for practical long-horizon agent planning. It features multi-day travel planning and multi-product shopping tasks that require proactive information acquisition, local constrained reasoning, and global constrained optimization. Evaluations on DeepPlanning show that even frontier agentic LLMs struggle with these problems, highlighting the importance of reliable explicit reasoning patterns and parallel tool use for achieving better effectiveness-efficiency trade-offs. Error analysis further points to promising directions for improving agentic LLMs over long planning horizons. We open-source the code and data to support future research.

Abstract:
Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) leverages cross-lingual evidence to ground Large Language Models (LLMs) in global knowledge. However, we show that current mRAG systems suffer from a language bias during reranking, systematically favoring English and the query’s native language. By introducing an estimated oracle evidence analysis, we quantify a substantial performance gap between existing rerankers and the achievable upper bound. Further analysis reveals a critical distributional mismatch: while optimal predictions require evidence scattered across multiple languages, current systems systematically suppress such “answer-critical” documents, thereby limiting downstream generation performance. To bridge this gap, we propose L anguage- A gnostic U tility-driven R eranker A lignment (LAURA) , Experiments across diverse languages and generation models show that LAURA effectively mitigates language bias and consistently improves mRAG performance.

Abstract:
Understanding long videos remains challenging due to the sparsity of visual evidence relevant to a given query. Prior work has explored program-based visual grounding, typically relying on executable programs generated by auxiliary large language models. However, when scaling to long videos, existing approaches face several critical limitations: (1) frame-centric vision modules are often insufficient for long video processing; (2) naively applying program-based reasoning to all queries incurs considerable computational overhead; and (3) errors arising from low-confidence predictions and imperfect program execution are difficult to recover from. To address these challenges, we propose VideoPro, a unified framework that enables VideoLLMs to adaptively reason over long videos and refine their predictions through executable programs. VideoPro first performs adaptive reasoning, dynamically determining whether a query can be resolved directly by the native VideoLLM or requires explicit multi-step program reasoning. For complex queries, the model decomposes the task into executable programs that invoke specialized vision modules for precise temporal and semantic grounding. To further improve robustness, VideoPro incorporates a self-refinement mechanism that leverages execution feedback and confidence signals to correct erroneous executions and refine low-confidence reasoning programs. By tightly integrating adaptive reasoning with self-refinement, VideoPro consistently outperforms prior methods across multiple long-video understanding benchmarks, yielding an average 6.7% improvement for Qwen3-VL-8B.

Abstract:
A key challenge in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) is the intractability of their likelihood functions, which are essential for the RL objective, necessitating corresponding approximation during training. While existing methods approximate the log-likelihoods by their evidence lower bounds (ELBOs) via customized Monte Carlo (MC) sampling, they incur significant memory overhead due to the need to retain all MC samples for the gradient computation of non-linear terms in the RL objective, and thus restrict feasible sample sizes, leading to imprecise likelihood approximations and distorted RL objective. To address this, we propose Boundary-Guided Policy Optimization (BGPO), a memory-efficient RL algorithm that maximizes a specially constructed lower bound of the ELBO-based objective. This lower bound is carefully designed to satisfy two key properties: (1) Linearity: it is a linear sum where each term depends only on a single MC sample, thereby enabling gradient accumulation across samples and ensuring constant memory usage; (2) Equivalence: Both the value and gradient of this lower bound are equal to those of the ELBO-based objective in on-policy training, making it also an effective approximation for the original RL objective. These properties allow BGPO to adopt a large MC sample size, improving likelihood approximations and RL objective estimation, which in turn leads to enhanced performance. Experiments show that BGPO significantly outperforms previous RL algorithms for dLLMs in math problem solving, code generation, and planning tasks.

Abstract:
Neologism-aware machine translation aims to translate source sentences containing neologisms into target languages.This field remains underexplored compared with general machine translation (MT).In this paper, we propose an agentic framework, NeoAMT, for neologism-aware machine translation equipped with a Wiktionary-based search toolkit.Specifically, we first construct a dedicated dataset for neologism-aware machine translation and build a search toolkit grounded in Wiktionary.The dataset covers 16 languages and 75 translation directions in total, derived from approximately 10 million records of an English Wiktionary dump.The retrieval corpus of the search toolkit is also constructed from around 3 million cleaned records of the same dump.We then leverage the dataset and toolkit to train a translation agent via reinforcement learning (RL) and to evaluate the accuracy of neologism-aware machine translation.Furthermore, we propose an RL training framework featuring a novel reward design and an adaptive rollout generation strategy that exploits translation difficulty to further improve the translation quality of translation agents using our search toolkit.

Abstract:
Despite extensive safety alignment, Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail against jailbreak attacks. While machine unlearning has emerged as a promising defense by erasing specific harmful parameters, current methods remain vulnerable to diverse jailbreaks. We first conduct an empirical study and discover that this failure mechanism is caused by jailbreaks primarily activating non-erased parameters in the intermediate layers. Further, by probing the underlying mechanism through which these circumvented parameters reassemble into the prohibited output, we verify the persistent existence of dynamic jailbreak paths and show that the inability to rectify them constitutes the fundamental gap in existing unlearning defenses. To bridge this gap, we propose Jailbreak Path Unlearning (JPU), which is the first to rectify dynamic jailbreak paths towards safety anchors by dynamically mining on-policy adversarial samples to expose vulnerabilities and identify jailbreak paths. Extensive experiments demonstrate that JPU significantly enhances jailbreak resistance against dynamic attacks while preserving the model’s utility.

Abstract:
Generative speech technologies are progressing rapidly, but evaluating the perceptual quality of synthetic speech remains a core challenge. Existing methods typically rely on scalar scores or binary decisions, which lack interpretability and generalization across tasks and languages. We present SpeechLLM-as-Judges, a new paradigm for enabling large language models (LLMs) to conduct structured and explanation-based speech quality evaluation. To support this direction, we introduce SpeechEval, a large-scale dataset containing 32,207 multilingual speech clips and 128,754 annotations spanning four tasks: quality assessment, pairwise comparison, improvement suggestion, and deepfake detection. Based on this resource, we develop SQ-LLM, a speech-quality-aware LLM trained with chain-of-thought reasoning and reward optimization to improve capability. Experimental results show that SQ-LLM delivers strong performance across tasks and languages, revealing the potential of this paradigm for advancing speech quality evaluation. The relevant code, models, and data are publicly available at https://github.com/NKU-HLT/SpeechLLM-as-Judges.

Abstract:
Instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong instruction-following and generalization abilities, enabled by expensive post-training pipelines. However, adapting them to specific downstream tasks remains challenging: direct fine-tuning often disrupts this delicate balance, while existing adapter-based transfer methods typically treat the instruction-tuned model as a passive target that only participates at the final merging stage. We propose GIFT (Guided Fine-Tuning and Transfer), a simple and efficient framework that incorporates instruction-level guidance into task adaptation. GIFT fine-tunes a low-rank adapter on the pretrained base model using token-level confidence signals derived from the instruction-tuned model. The learned adapter is then merged into the instruction-tuned model, yielding task-specialized models that preserve general instruction-following behavior. We evaluate GIFT on mathematical reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks across multiple model families and scales. Results show that GIFT consistently outperforms direct fine-tuning and representative transfer-based baselines, while maintaining robust generalization and favorable test-time scaling behavior.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face severe challenges in long-context processing, including quadratic computational costs, information forgetting, and the context fragmentation inherent in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). We introduce LycheeMemory, a cognitively inspired framework that enables efficient long-context inference via chunk-wise compression and selective memory recall, rather than processing all raw tokens. LycheeMemory segments the input into chunks and encodes each into compressed KV-cache style representations using a Compressor. A Gate then dynamically selects relevant memory blocks, which a Reasoner iteratively processes with an evolving working memory to solve downstream tasks. The Compressor and Reasoner are jointly optimized via end-to-end reinforcement learning, while the Gate is trained separately as a classifier. Experimental results demonstrate that LycheeMemory achieves competitive accuracy (up to 82% in ablation variants) on multi-hop reasoning benchmarks (e.g., RULER-HQA), successfully extrapolates context length from 7K to 1.75M, and provides a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off against strong long-context baselines. Notably, compared to MemAgent, LycheeMemory achieves an average 2× reduction in peak GPU memory usage and a 6× speedup during inference.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become widely deployed, yet their safety alignment remains fragile under adversarial inputs. Previous work has shown that increasing inference steps can disrupt safety mechanisms and lead MLLMs to generate attacker-desired harmful content. However, most existing attacks focus on increasing the complexity of the modified visual task itself and do not explicitly leverage the model’s own reasoning incentives. This leads to them underperforming on reasoning models (Models with Chain-of-Thoughts) compared to non-reasoning ones (Models without Chain-of-Thoughts). If a model can think like a human, can we influence its cognitive-stage decisions so that it proactively completes a jailbreak? To validate this idea, we propose GAMBIT (Gamified Adversarial Multimodal Breakout via Instructional Traps), a novel multimodal jailbreak framework that decomposes and reassembles harmful visual semantics, then constructs a gamified scene that drives the model to explore, reconstruct intent, and answer as part of winning the game. The resulting structured reasoning chain increases task complexity in both vision and text, positioning the model as a participant whose goal pursuit reduces safety attention and induces it to answer the reconstructed malicious query. Extensive experiments on popular reasoning and non-reasoning MLLMs demonstrate that GAMBIT achieves high Attack Success Rates (ASR), reaching 92.13% on Gemini 2.5 Flash, 91.20% on QvQ-MAX, and 85.87% on GPT-4o, significantly outperforming baselines. Warning: This paper contains unsafe and offensive examples.

Abstract:
As video large language models (Video-LLMs) become increasingly integrated into real-world applications that demand grounded multimodal reasoning, ensuring their factual consistency and reliability is of critical importance. However, sycophancy, the tendency of these models to align with user input even when it contradicts the visual evidence, undermines their trustworthiness in such contexts. Current sycophancy research has largely overlooked its specific manifestations in the video-language domain, resulting in a notable absence of systematic benchmarks and targeted evaluations to understand how Video-LLMs respond under misleading user input. To fill this gap, we propose ViSE (Video-LLM Sycophancy Benchmarking and Evaluation), the first benchmark designed to evaluate sycophantic behavior in state-of-the-art Video-LLMs across diverse question formats, prompt biases, and visual reasoning tasks. Specifically, ViSE pioneeringly brings linguistic perspectives on sycophancy into the video domain, enabling fine-grained analysis across multiple sycophancy types and interaction patterns. Furthermore, we propose two potential training-free mitigation strategies revealing potential paths for reducing sycophantic bias: (i) enhancing visual grounding through interpretable key-frame selection and (ii) steering model behavior away from sycophancy via targeted, inference-time intervention on its internal neural representations. Our code is available at https://github.com/William030422/Video-Sycophancy.

Abstract:
Evaluating whether large language models (LLMs) capture the structureof natural language beyond local fluency remains an open challenge.Existing evaluation methods, largely based on task performance orshort-context behavior, provide limited insight into the long-rangestatistical organization of generated text.We propose a complementary evaluation framework based on repeatedsubsequences. By analyzing their distribution across scales andrelating it to higher-order Rényi entropies, we probe how textsreuse previously established structure under finite-lengthconditions. Experiments on human-written texts and length-matchedGPT-generated texts show that,while power-law models can describerestricted ranges of block length, the observed entropy growth isoften equally or better characterized by logarithmic–power forms.Across datasets, natural language exhibits stable entropy-growthpatterns over accessible ranges, with consistent average behavior despite variability across individual texts. In contrast,GPT-generated texts show systematic and statistically significantshifts in estimated exponents with model size.These results demonstrate that repeated-subsequence entropyprovides a quantitative structural diagnostic that revealssystematic differences in long-range organization,distinguishing natural language from state-of-the-art LLM outputsbeyond surface-level fluency.

Abstract:
Users increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) for Deep Research, using them to synthesize diverse sources into structured reports that support understanding and action. In this context, the practical reliability of such reports hinges on logical quality: whether the report’s claims and arguments are explicitly supported and can be trusted as a basis for downstream use, rather than merely appearing fluent or informative. However, current evaluation frameworks largely overlook this requirement. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReportLogic, a benchmark that quantifies report-level logical quality through a reader-centric lens of auditability. Specifically, ReportLogic adopts a hierarchical taxonomy that evaluates whether readers can (1) trace an on-topic report structure with a unified analytical arc (Macro-Logic), (2) understand the progression with necessary context (Expositional-Logic), and (3) verify conclusions via explicit claim–support (Structural-Logic). Based on this taxonomy, we construct a human-annotated rubric-guided dataset and train an open-source LogicJudge for scalable evaluation. We further evaluate judge robustness via adversarial attacks, showing that off-the-shelf LLM judges are frequently influenced by superficial cues (e.g., verbosity), and reasoning modes can mask broken support relations. Overall, our results provide actionable guidance for building more robust logic evaluators and improving the logical reliability of LLM-generated reports.

Abstract:
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has become a standard paradigm for eliciting complex reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models, it inadvertently exposes a new attack surface for backdoor attacks. Existing CoT backdoor attacks typically manipulate the intermediate reasoning steps to steer the model toward incorrect answers. However, these corrupted reasoning traces are readily detected by prevalent process-monitoring defenses. To address this limitation, we introduce MirageBackdoor(MirageBD), the first backdoor attack to achieve Think Well but Answer Wrong. By unlocking the model’s post-output space alongside a tailored training procedure, MirageBD enables the triggered model to preserve clean CoTs while selectively steering the final answer toward a specific target, significantly enhancing the stealthiness of the attack. Experiments show that MirageBD generally achieves over 90% attack success rate across four datasets and five models with a poison ratio of only 5%. Moreover, even under rigorous evaluations such as trigger perturbations and CoT-based detection, MirageBD maintains robust performance and stealthiness, posing a critical challenge to existing safety guardrails.

Abstract:
We identify a novel phenomenon in language models: benign fine-tuning of frontier models can lead to privacy collapse. We find that diverse, subtle patterns in training data can degrade contextual privacy, including optimisation for helpfulness, exposure to user information, emotional and subjective dialogue, and debugging code printing internal variables, among others. Finetuned models lose their ability to reason about contextual privacy norms, share information inappropriately with tools, and violate memory boundaries across contexts. Privacy collapse is a “silent failure” because models maintain high performance on standard safety and utility benchmarks whilst exhibiting severe privacy vulnerabilities. Our experiments show evidence of privacy collapse across six models (closed and open weight), five fine-tuning datasets (real-world and controlled data), and two task categories (agentic and memory-based). Our mechanistic analysis reveals that privacy representations are uniquely fragile to fine-tuning, compared to task-relevant features which are preserved. Our results reveal a critical gap in current safety evaluations, in particular for the deployment of specialised agents.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as rerankers in information retrieval, yet their ranking behavior can be steered by small, natural-sounding prompts. To expose this vulnerability, we present Rank Anything First (RAF), a two-stage token optimization method that crafts concise textual perturbations to consistently promote a target item in LLM-generated rankings while remaining hard to detect. Stage 1 uses Greedy Coordinate Gradient to shortlist candidate tokens at the current position by combining the gradient of the rank-target with a readability score; Stage 2 evaluates those candidates under exact ranking and readability losses using an entropy-based dynamic weighting scheme, and selects a token via temperature-controlled sampling. RAF generates ranking-promoting prompts token-by-token, guided by dual objectives: maximizing ranking effectiveness and preserving linguistic naturalness. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that RAF significantly boosts the rank of target items using naturalistic language, with greater robustness than existing methods in both promoting target items and maintaining naturalness. These findings underscore a critical security implication: LLM-based reranking is inherently susceptible to adversarial manipulation, raising new challenges for the trustworthiness and robustness of modern retrieval systems. Our code is available at: https://github.com/glad-lab/RAF.

Abstract:
Constructed languages (conlangs) such as Esperanto and Quenya have played diverse roles in art, philosophy, and international communication. Meanwhile, foundation models have revolutionized creative generation in text, images, and beyond. In this work, we leverage modern LLMs as computational creativity aids for end-to-end conlang creation. We introduce ConlangCrafter, a multi-hop pipeline that decomposes language design into modular stages – phonology, morphology, syntax, lexicon generation, and translation. At each stage, our method leverages LLMs’ metalinguistic reasoning capabilities, injecting randomness to encourage diversity and leveraging self-refinement feedback to encourage consistency in the emerging language description. We construct a novel, scalable evaluation framework for this task, evaluating metrics measuring consistency and typological diversity. Automatic and manual evaluations demonstrate ConlangCrafter’s ability to produce coherent and varied conlangs without human linguistic expertise. We will release our code and data.

Abstract:
Omni-modal large language models (OLLMs) offer a promising end-to-end solution for slide-enhanced speech recognition due to their inherent multimodal capabilities. However, we found a fundamental issue faced by OLLMs: Visual Interference , where models show a bias towards visible text over auditory signals, causing them to hallucinate slide content that was never spoken. To address this, we propose Visually-Anchored Policy Optimization (VAPO), which aims to reshape models’ inference process to follow the human-like “Look-then-Listen” inference chain. Specifically, we design a temporally decoupled policy: the model first extracts visual priors in a think> block to serve as semantic anchors, then generates the transcription in an answer> block. The policy is optimized via multi-objective reinforcement learning. Furthermore, we introduce SlideASR-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to address the scarcity of entity-rich data, comprising a large-scale synthetic corpus for training and a challenging real-world test set for evaluation. We conduct extensive evaluations demonstrating that VAPO effectively eliminates visual interference and achieves state-of-the-art performance on SlideASR-Bench and public datasets, significantly reducing entity recognition errors in specialized domains.

Abstract:
Individual investors are significantly outnumbered and disadvantaged in financial markets, overwhelmed by abundant information and lacking professional analysis. Equity research reports stand out as crucial resources, offering valuable insights. By leveraging these reports, large language models (LLMs) can enhance investors’ decision-making capabilities and strengthen financial analysis. However, two key challenges limit their effectiveness: (1) the rapid evolution of market events often outpaces the slow update cycles of existing knowledge bases, (2) the long-form and unstructured nature of financial reports further hinders timely and context-aware integration by LLMs. To address these challenges, we tackle both data and methodological aspects. First, we introduce the Event-Enhanced Automated Construction of Financial Knowledge Graph (FinKario), a dataset comprising over 305,360 entities, 210,328 relational triples, and 19 distinct relation types. FinKario automatically integrates real-time company fundamentals and market events through prompt-driven extraction guided by professional institutional templates, providing structured and accessible financial insights for LLMs. Additionally, we propose a Two-Stage, Graph-Based retrieval strategy (FinKario-RAG), optimizing the retrieval of evolving, large-scale financial knowledge to ensure efficient and precise data access. Extensive experiments show that FinKario with FinKario-RAG achieves superior stock trend prediction accuracy, outperforming financial LLMs by 18.81% and institutional strategies by 17.85% on average in backtesting. [Our code is available at .]

Abstract:
Recent works have analyzed the impact of individual components of neural networks on gendered predictions, often with a focus on mitigating gender bias. However, mechanistic interpretations of gender tend to (i) focus on a very specific gender-related task, such as gendered pronoun prediction, or (ii) fail to distinguish between the production of factually gendered outputs (the correct assumption of gender given a word that carries gender as a semantic property) and gender biased outputs (based on a stereotype). To address these issues, we curate Gknow, a benchmark to assess gender knowledge and gender bias in language models across different types of gender-related predictions. Gknow allows us to identify and analyze circuits and individual neurons responsible for gendered predictions. We test the impact of neuron ablation on benchmarks for disentangling stereotypical and factual gender (DiFair and the test set of Gknow), as well as StereoSet. Results show that gender bias and factual gender are severely entangled on the level of both circuits and neurons, entailing that ablation is an unreliable debiasing method. Furthermore, we show that benchmarks for evaluating gender bias can hide the decrease in factual gender knowledge that accompanies neuron ablation. We curate Gknow as a contribution to the continuous development of robust gender bias benchmarks.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) to human preferences is pivotal for Machine Translation (MT), yet current approaches are often hindered by misleading reward signals. Our analysis reveals that prevailing Quality Estimation (QE) models exhibit a systematic blind spot towards partial errors—specifically partial hallucinations and omissions—often favoring superficially fluent but unfaithful translations. To address this, we propose M 2 PO (Multi-Perspective Multi-Pair Preference Optimization), a data-centric framework for preference optimization in machine translation. First, to correct the bias towards fluency, M 2 PO uses a multi-perspective alignment mechanism that decouples semantic fidelity from fluency, prioritizing faithfulness via a curriculum strategy. Second, with the bias corrected, partial errors fall between perfect and severely incorrect translations, making them inefficient to learn via standard best-versus-worst comparisons. We thus introduce a multi-pair objective that leverages the full candidate list to capture these fine-grained error signals. Experiments on WMT23, WMT24, and FLORES-200 show that M 2 PO enables a 9B model to outperform leading open-source baselines and achieve parity with proprietary models like GPT-4o and Gemini-2.0-Flash, demonstrating significant potential for efficient, high-fidelity LLM-based translation.

Abstract:
Contrastively pretrained audio–language models (e.g., CLAP) excel at clip-level understanding but struggle with frame-level tasks.Existing extensions fail to exploit the varying granularity of real-world audio–text data, where massive clip-level textual descriptions coexist with limited frame-level annotations. This paper proposes Fine-grained Language-Audio Pretraining (FineLAP), a novel training paradigm that advances both clip- and frame-level alignment in CLAP with heterogeneous data.FineLAP introduces a dual-stream sigmoid loss with a cluster-based sampling strategy to jointly learn from clip- and frame-level supervision. To capture both global semantics and local details, FineLAP uses a decoupled audio projector on top of a self-supervised encoder.To alleviate the scarcity of temporally annotated data, we present FineLAP-100k, a large-scale synthetic SED dataset constructed through a scalable curation pipeline.Extensive experiments demonstrate that FineLAP achieves SOTA performance across multiple audio understanding tasks, including retrieval, classification, sound event detection, and text-to-audio grounding. Ablation studies further show that coarse- and fine-grained alignment are mutually beneficial, providing insights for building better audio-language models (ALMs).

Abstract:
Model distillation is a primary driver behind the rapid progress of LLM agents, yet it often leads to behavioral homogenization. Many emerging agents share nearly identical reasoning steps and failure modes, suggesting they may be distilled echoes of a few dominant teachers. Existing metrics, however, fail to distinguish mandatory behaviors required for task success from non-mandatory patterns thatreflect a model’s autonomous preferences. We propose two complementary metrics to isolate non-mandatory behavioral patterns: Response Pattern Similarity (RPS) for verbal alignment and Action Graph Similarity (AGS) for tool-use habits modeled as directed graphs. Evaluating 18 models from 8 providers on 𝜏 -Bench and 𝜏 2 -Bench against Claude Sonnet 4.5 (thinking), we find that within-family model pairs score 5.9 pp higher in AGS than cross-family pairs, and that Kimi-K2 (thinking) reaches 82.6% S node and 94.7% S dep , exceeding Anthropic’s own Opus 4.1. A controlled distillation experiment further confirms that AGS distinguishes teacher-specific convergence from general improvement. RPS and AGS capture distinct behavioral dimensions (Pearson r = 0.491), providing complementary diagnostic signals for behavioral convergence in the agent ecosystem.Our code is available at https://github.com/Syuchin/AgentEcho .

Abstract:
Tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) enables LLM agents to solve tasks through planning, tool use, and iterative revision, but outcome-only reinforcement learning in this setting suffers from sparse, delayed rewards and weak step-level credit assignment. In long-horizon TIR trajectories, an early irrecoverable mistake can determine success or failure, making it crucial to localize the first irrecoverable step and leverage it for fine-grained credit assignment. We propose Error-Localized Policy Optimization (ELPO), which localizes the first irrecoverable step via binary-search rollout trees under a fixed rollout budget, converts the resulting tree into stable learning signals through hierarchical advantage attribution, and applies error-localized adaptive clipping to strengthen corrective updates on the critical step and its suffix. Across TIR benchmarks in math, science QA, and code execution, ELPO consistently outperforms strong Agentic RL baselines under comparable sampling budgets, with additional gains in Pass@K and Major@K scaling, rollout ranking quality, and tool-call efficiency. Our code is publicly released for reproducibility at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ELPO-7C19.

Abstract:
Temporal Action Localization (TAL) requires identifying both the boundaries and categories of actions in untrimmed videos. While vision-language models (VLMs) offer rich semantics to complement visual evidence, existing approaches tend to overemphasize linguistic priors at the expense of visual performance, leading to a pronounced modality bias. We propose ActionVLM, a vision-language aggregation framework that systematically mitigates modality bias in TAL. Our key insight is to preserve vision as the dominant signal while adaptively exploiting language only when beneficial. To this end, we introduce (i) a debiasing reweighting module that estimates the language advantage—the incremental benefit of language over vision-only predictions—and dynamically reweights language modality accordingly, and (ii) a residual aggregation strategy that treats language as a complementary refinement rather than the primary driver. This combination alleviates modality bias, reduces overconfidence from linguistic priors, and strengthens temporal reasoning. Experiments on THUMOS14 show that our model outperforms state-of-the-art by up to 3.2% mAP. Our code is available at https://github.com/JiaqiLi404/ActionVLM

Abstract:
Estimating question difficulty is a critical component in evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) for question answering (QA). Existing approaches often rely on readability formulas, retrieval-based signals, or popularity statistics, which may not fully capture the reasoning challenges posed to modern LLMs. In this paper, we introduce Q-DAPS (Question Difficulty based on Answer Plausibility Scores) method, a novel approach that estimates question difficulty by computing the entropy of plausibility scores over candidate answers. We systematically evaluate Q-DAPS across four prominent QA datasets—TriviaQA, NQ, MuSiQue, and QASC—demonstrating that it consistently outperforms baselines. Moreover, Q-DAPS shows strong robustness across hyperparameter variations and question types. Extensive ablation studies further show that Q-DAPS remains robust across different plausibility estimation paradigms, model sizes, and realistic settings. Human evaluations further confirm strong alignment between Q-DAPS’s difficulty estimates and human judgments of question difficulty. Overall, Q-DAPS provides an interpretable, scalable, and bias-resilient approach to question difficulty estimation in modern QA systems.

Abstract:
LLMs are highly sensitive to prompt design, but handcrafting effective prompts is difficult and often requires intricate crafting of few-shot examples. We propose a fast automatic prompt construction algorithm that augments human instructions by generating a small set of few shot examples. Our method iteratively replaces/drops/keeps few-shot examples using Monte Carlo Shapley estimation of example utility. For faster execution, we use aggressive subsampling and a replay buffer for faster evaluations. Our method can be run using different compute time budgets. Under a limited budget, it outperforms prior automatic prompting methods on text simplification and mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, DeepMath, Math500), while achieving second-best results on classification and summarization and third-best on MedQA. With an extended, yet still modest budget, PIAST sets a new state of the art among automatic prompting methods on classification, simplification, GSM8K, DeepMath, and Math500. Overall, our results suggest that optimizing in-context examples, rather than exhaustively searching over instruction rewrites is the dominant lever for fast and data-efficient prompt engineering. We will release code and data upon acceptance.

Abstract:
AI coding assistants automatically gather context from potentially untrusted sources to generate code recommendations. We introduce Cross-Origin Context Poisoning (XOXO), a novel attack that exploits this automatic context inclusion by subtly manipulating code without changing its semantics. Attackers introduce semantics-preserving transformations (e.g., renamed variables) to shared code, causing AI assistants to unknowingly recommend vulnerable code patterns to victims. To systematically identify effective transformations, we present Greedy Cayley Graph Search (GCGS), a black-box algorithm that efficiently composes transformations to identify adversarial inputs. Our evaluation demonstrates XOXO’s effectiveness at making LLMs generate buggy and vulnerable code, achieving average attack success rates of 73.20% against eight state-of-the-art models including GPT 4.1 and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2, with vulnerability injection rates up to 66.67%. We also demonstrate a real-world attack against GitHub Copilot, highlighting critical security gaps in current AI coding tools.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have gained significant attention due to their objective and verifiable reward signals, demonstrating strong performance in reasoning and code generation tasks. However, the potential safety risks associated with RLVR remain underexplored. This paper presents HarmRLVR, the first systematic investigation into the alignment reversibility risk of RLVR. We show that safety alignment can be rapidly reversed using GRPO with merely 64 harmful prompts without responses, causing models to readily comply with harmful instructions. Across five models from Llama, Qwen, and DeepSeek, we empirically demonstrate that RLVR-based attacks elevate the average harmfulness score to 4.94 with an attack success rate of 96.01%, significantly outperforming harmful fine-tuning while preserving general capabilities. Our findings reveal that RLVR can be efficiently exploited for harmful alignment, posing serious threats to open-source model safety.

Abstract:
Hybrid offline–online reinforcement learning (O2O RL) promises both sample efficiency and robust exploration, but suffers from instability due to distribution shift between offline and online data. We introduce RLPD-GX, a framework that decouples policy optimization from safety enforcement: a reward-seeking learner explores freely, while a projection-based guardian guarantees rule-consistent execution and safe value backups. This design preserves the exploratory value of online interactions without collapsing to conservative policies. To further stabilize training, we propose dynamic curricula that gradually extend temporal horizons and anneal offline–online data mixing. We prove convergence via a contraction property of the guarded Bellman operator, and empirically show state-of-the-art performance on Atari-100k, achieving a normalized mean score of 3.02 (+45% over prior hybrid methods) with stronger safety and stability. Beyond Atari, ablations demonstrate consistent gains across safety-critical and long-horizon tasks, underscoring the generality of our design. Extensive and comprehensive results highlight decoupled safety enforcement as a simple yet principled route to robust O2O RL, suggesting a broader paradigm for reconciling exploration and safety in reinforcement learning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely explored in educational scenarios. We identify a critical vulnerability in current educational LLMs, pedagogical jailbreaks, where students use answer-inducing prompts to elicit solutions rather than scaffolded instructions. To enable systematic study, we unify and formalize safe, helpful, and pedagogical behaviors with a knowledge-mastery graph and introduce SHAPE, a benchmark of 9,087 student-question pairs for evaluating tutoring behavior under adversarial pressure. We propose a graph-augmented tutoring pipeline that infers prerequisite concepts from queries, identifies mastery gaps, and routes generation between instructing and problem-solving via explicit gating. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that our method yields significantly improved safety under two pedagogical jailbreak settings, while maintaining near-ceiling helpfulness under the same evaluation protocol. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/MAPS-research/SHaPE

Abstract:
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has emerged as a crucial paradigm for enhancing large language model (LLM) performance on multi-step reasoning tasks.However, the internal mechanisms by which LLMs invoke knowledge and propagate information across different steps of the CoT are poorly understood.To fill this gap, we propose a multi-stage probing framework that enforces structured reasoning with three explicit stages: keyword extraction, theorem generation, and computation execution.The framework integrates attention knockout to trace cross-layer information flow and theorem probing to examine how specific contents are encoded within representations.To enable controlled and stage-aligned analysis, we construct a structured CoT dataset that covers the mathematics and physics domains. Experiments on four instruction-tuned LLMs reveal distinct stage-specific patterns.First, keyword information is progressively aggregated into the final token in later layers.Second, theorem semantics are encoded in the mid-to-late layers and undergo two stages of propagation.Finally, parameter substitution is achieved through joint extraction by the final token and other tokens.The first parameter predominantly relies on the final token, whereas later parameters increasingly depend on information extracted by other tokens.Overall, our findings shed light on the neural implementation of CoT reasoning and provide actionable insights for developing more interpretable and reasoning-capable LLMs.We further evaluate a free-form prompting setting without labeled fields and observe consistent qualitative trends.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel as conversational agents. However, these capabilities can be weaponized to automate social engineering attacks that gradually build rapport to compromise the online safety of users. To understand this, researchers have simulated LLM-based attacks in controlled settings. However, the existing simulators focus on just Personal Identifiable Information (PII) requests within the chat. Thus, to represent a complete attack scenario, we introduce PhishSim, an outcome-driven LLM-based phishing simulator that verifies compromise by simulating a victim completing an external action step, such as submitting credentials on a malicious platform. This enables the generation of diverse, multi-turn attack trajectories. Building on these trajectories, we position PhishGate as a practical mitigation baseline for outcome-grounded conversational phishing: a real-time multi-agent risk scorer that detects manipulation tactics and estimates the severity of ongoing chats. For ambiguous cases, it invokes RAG-supported consistency checks. Evaluating four state-of-the-art LLM backends in a real-time setting, we find that PhishGate improves dialogue-level detection over a real-time baseline. Our results highlight both the promise and brittleness of LLM-based real-time phishing defense, providing an outcome-grounded testbed for studying conversational compromise.

Abstract:
Scientific discovery evolution does not emerge in isolation but stems from the structural deepening and recombination of existing functionalities. However, current automated hypothesis generation methods, constrained by the statistical co-occurrence nature of Large Language Models (LLMs), lack perception of temporal causality and the "evolutionary patterns" inherent in scientific development. Consequently, they often yield superficial combinations that are logically infeasible. To address this, we propose EvoNarrator, a framework for hypothesis generation based on evolutionary narratives. We first extract structured P-M-L-F (Problem, Method, Limitation, Future Work) quadruples from citation networks. Subsequently, we introduce the SocketMatch mechanism, which eliminates logical disconnects between methods and problems by assessing their deep semantic compatibility. Finally, utilizing three macro patterns—Chain, Divergence, and Convergence—we constrain the generation process within historically logical derivation paths. Furthermore, double-blind expert reviews yielded an average score of 4.80/5.00 across novelty, feasibility, theoretical, and Logical. Additionally, hindcasting experiments validated its predictive foresight. Crucially, ablation studies indicate that integrating evolutionary patterns facilitates a paradigm shift from conservative incrementalism to theoretically grounded structural innovation. The code is available at https://github.com/xiyii-star/EvoNarrator.

Abstract:
Language models (LMs) behave more like humans when their cognitive resources are restricted, particularly in predicting sentence processing costs such as reading times. However, it remains unclear whether such constraints similarly affect sentence comprehension strategies, and existing methods do not directly target the balance between memory storage and sentence processing, which is central to human working memory. To address this issue, we propose a dual-task paradigm that combines an arithmetic computation task with a sentence comprehension task, such as "The 2 cocktail + blended 3 =...". Our experiments show that under dual-task conditions, GPT-4o, o3-mini, and o4-mini shift toward plausibility-based comprehension, mirroring humans’ rational inference. Specifically, these models show a greater accuracy gap between plausible sentences (e.g., "The cocktail was blended by the bartender") and implausible sentences (e.g., "The bartender was blended by the cocktail") in the dual-task condition compared to the single-task conditions. These findings suggest that constraints on the balance between memory and processing resources promote rational inference in LMs. More broadly, they support the view that human-like sentence comprehension fundamentally arises from the allocation of limited cognitive resources.

Abstract:
Recent advances in neural song generation have enabled high-quality synthesis from lyrics and global textual prompts. However, most systems fail to model temporally varying attributes of songs, severely limiting fine-grained control over musical structure and dynamics. To address this, we propose Segtune, a Diffusion Transformer-based framework enabling structured and fine-grained controllability by allowing users or large language models (LLMs) to specify local musical descriptions aligned to song segments. These segment prompts are temporally broadcast to corresponding time windows, while global prompts ensure stylistic coherence. To support precise lyric-to-music alignment, we introduce an LLM-based duration predictor that autoregressively generates sentence-level timestamps in LyRiCs format. We further construct a large-scale data pipeline for high-quality song collection with aligned lyrics and prompts, and propose new metrics to evaluate segment alignment and vocal consistency. Experiments demonstrate that Segtune outperforms existing baselines in both musicality and controllability. Visit our demo page for codes and more generated songs.

Abstract:
Autoregressive decoding inherently limits the inference throughput of Large Language Model (LLM) due to its sequential dependency. Speculative decoding mitigates this by verifying multiple predicted tokens in parallel, but its efficiency remains constrained by what we identify as verification heterogeneity—the uneven difficulty of verifying different speculative candidates. In practice, a small subset of high-confidence predictions accounts for most successful verifications, yet existing methods treat all candidates uniformly, leading to redundant computation. We present HeteroSpec, a heterogeneity-adaptive speculative decoding framework that allocates verification effort in proportion to candidate uncertainty. HeteroSpec estimates verification complexity using a lightweight entropy-based quantifier, partitions candidates via a data-driven stratification policy, and dynamically tunes speculative depth and pruning thresholds through coordinated optimization. Across five benchmarks and four LLMs, HeteroSpec delivers an average 4.24× decoding speedup over state-of-the-art methods such as EAGLE-3, while preserving exact output distributions. Crucially, HeteroSpec requires no model retraining and remains compatible with other inference optimizations, making it a practical direction for improving speculative decoding efficiency.

Abstract:
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) poses significant challenges for agents to interpret natural language instructions and navigate complex 3D environments. While recent progress has been driven by large-scale pre-training and data augmentation, current methods still struggle to generalize to unseen scenarios, particularly when complex spatial and temporal reasoning is required. In this work, we propose SkillNav, a modular framework that introduces structured, skill-based reasoning into Transformer-based VLN agents. Our method decomposes navigation into a set of interpretable atomic skills (e.g., Vertical Movement, Area and Region Identification, Stop and Pause), each handled by a specialized agent. To support targeted skill training without manual data annotation, we construct a synthetic dataset pipeline that generates diverse, linguistically natural, skill-specific instruction-trajectory pairs. We then introduce a novel training-free Vision-Language Model (VLM)-based router, which dynamically selects the most suitable agent at each time step by aligning sub-goals with visual observations and previous actions. SkillNav obtains competitive results on commonly used benchmarks and establishes state-of-the-art generalization to the GSA-R2R, a benchmark with novel instruction styles and unseen environments.

Abstract:
Molecular graph learning benefits from positional signals that capture both local neighborhoods and global topology. Two widely used families are spectral encodings derived from Laplacian or diffusion operators and anchor-based distance encodings built from shortest-path information, but the relationship between them is still not well understood. In this paper, we study when anchor-based distance encodings can approximate diffusion geometry. Under a random r-regular graph model, we derive an explicit trilateration map that reconstructs truncated diffusion coordinates from transformed anchor distances and anchor spectral positions, together with pointwise and Frobenius-gap guarantees. On DrugBank with a shared GNP-based DDI backbone, anchor-distance Nyström accurately recovers diffusion geometry, and both DE and LapPE outperform models without positional encodings, with LapPE showing slightly more consistent performance.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), uncertainty quantification in LLM generation is a persistent challenge. Although recent approaches have achieved strong performance by restricting LLMs to produce short or constrained answer sets, many real-world applications require long-form and free-form text generation. A key difficulty in this setting is that LLMs often produce responses that are semantically coherent yet factually inaccurate, while the underlying semantics are multifaceted and the linguistic structure is complex. To tackle this challenge, this paper introduces Interrogative Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ), a novel framework that leverages inter-sample consistency and intra-sample faithfulness to quantify the uncertainty in long-form LLM outputs. By utilizing an interrogate-then-respond paradigm, our method provides reliable measures of claim-level uncertainty and the model’s faithfulness. Experimental results across diverse model families and model sizes demonstrate the superior performance of IUQ over two widely used long-form generation datasets.

Abstract:
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made significant progress in chart understanding. However, financial charts, characterized by complex temporal structures and domain-specific terminology, remain notably underexplored. We introduce FinChart-Bench, the first benchmark specifically focused on real-world financial charts. FinChart-Bench comprises 1,200 financial chart images collected from 2015 to 2024, each annotated with True/False (TF), Multiple Choice (MC), and Question Answering (QA) questions, totaling 7,016 questions. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of 26 state-of-the-art LVLMs on FinChart-Bench. Our evaluation reveals critical insights: (1) the performance gap between open-source and closed-source models is narrowing, (2) performance degradation occurs in upgraded models within families, (3) many models struggle with instruction following, (4) both advanced models show significant limitations in spatial reasoning abilities, and (5) current LVLMs are not reliable enough to serve as automated evaluators. These findings highlight important limitations in current LVLM capabilities for financial chart understanding.

Abstract:
Whether Large Language Models (LLMs) develop coherent internal world models remains a core debate. While conventional Next-Token Prediction (NTP) focuses on one-step-ahead supervision, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) has shown promise in learning more structured representations. In this work, we provide a theoretical perspective analyzing the gradient inductive bias of MTP, supported by empirical evidence, showing that MTP promotes the convergence toward internal belief states by inducing representational contractivity via gradient coupling. However, we reveal that standard MTP often suffers from structural hallucinations, where discrete token supervision encourages illegal shortcuts in latent space that violate environmental constraints. To address this, we propose a novel method Latent Semantic Enhancement MTP (LSE-MTP), which anchors predictions to ground-truth hidden state trajectories. Experiments on synthetic graphs and real-world Manhattan Taxi Ride show that LSE-MTP effectively bridges the gap between discrete tokens and continuous state representations, enhancing representation alignment, reducing structural hallucinations, and improving robustness to perturbations.

Abstract:
Agents built on vision-language models increasingly face tasks that demand anticipating future states rather than relying on short-horizon reasoning. Generative world models offer a promising remedy: agents could use them as external simulators to foresee outcomes before acting. This paper empirically examines whether current agents can leverage such world models as tools to enhance their cognition. Across diverse agentic and visual question answering tasks, we observe that some agents rarely invoke simulation (fewer than 1%), frequently misuse predicted rollouts (approximately 15%), and often exhibit inconsistent or even degraded performance (up to 5%) when simulation is available or enforced. Attribution analysis further indicates that the primary bottleneck lies in the agents’ capacity to decide when to simulate, how to interpret predicted outcomes, and how to integrate foresight into downstream reasoning. These findings underscore the need for mechanisms that foster calibrated, strategic interaction with world models, paving the way toward more reliable anticipatory cognition in future agent systems.

Abstract:
The explainable medical coding task aims to automatically assign International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to clinical notes while providing explicit justifications for each assignment. Recent approaches employ large language models (LLMs) to generate such explanations. However, their performance remains limited due to a lack of understanding of the clinical meanings of ICD codes. Additionally, the vast ICD code space further complicates the task of accurate prediction. To address these challenges, we propose the ICDAGENT framework, which consists of two collaborative LLM agents: a coding agent and a critical agent. The coding agent extracts ICD codes and generates preliminary rationales, while the critical agent performs fine-grained chain-of-thought reasoning to verify and refine them. Furthermore, the critical agent is trained with a rationale-aware reward, combined with reinforcement learning, enabling it to distinguish between correct and incorrect reasoning and ensure explanation accuracy. Experiments across multiple ICD coding standards and datasets demonstrate that ICDAGENT achieves effective ICD coding with accurate and trustworthy explanations.

Abstract:
We propose a method to compare and visualise sentence encoders at scale by creating a map of encoders where each sentence encoder is represented in relation to the other sentence encoders. Specifically, we first represent a sentence encoder using an embedding matrix of a sentence set, where each row corresponds to the embedding of a sentence. Next, we compute the PIP matrix for a sentence encoder using its embedding matrix. Finally, we create a feature vector for each sentence encoder that reflects its QRE with respect to a unit base encoder. We construct a map of encoders covering 1101 publicly available sentence encoders, providing a new perspective of the landscape of the pre-trained sentence encoders. Our map accurately reflects various relationships between encoders, where encoders with similar attributes are proximally located on the map. Moreover, our encoder feature vectors can be used to accurately infer downstream task performance of the encoders, such as in retrieval and clustering tasks, demonstrating the correctness of our map.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL)-based enhancement of large language models (LLMs) often leads to reduced output diversity, undermining their utility in open-ended tasks like creative writing. Current methods lack explicit mechanisms for guiding diverse exploration and instead prioritize optimization efficiency and performance over diversity. This paper proposes an RL framework structured around a semi-structured long Chain-of-Thought (CoT), in which the generation process is decomposed into explicitly planned intermediate steps. We introduce a Diverse Planning Branching method that strategically introduces divergence at the planning phase based on diversity variation, alongside a group-aware diversity reward to encourage distinct trajectories. Experimental results on creative writing benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly improves output diversity without compromising generation quality, consistently outperforming existing baselines.

Abstract:
Language change both reflects and shapes social processes, and the semantic evolution of foundational concepts provides a measurable trace of historical and social transformation. Despite recent advances in diachronic semantics and discourse analysis, existing computational approaches often (i) concentrate on a single concept or a single corpus, making findings difficult to compare across heterogeneous sources, and (ii) remain confined to surface lexical evidence, offering insufficient computational and interpretive granularity when concepts are expressed implicitly. We propose HistLens, a unified, SAE-based framework for multi-concept, multi-corpus conceptual-history analysis. The framework decomposes concept representations into interpretable features and tracks their activation dynamics over time and across sources, yielding comparable conceptual trajectories within a shared coordinate system. Experiments on long-span press corpora show that HistLens supports cross-concept, cross-corpus computation of patterns of idea evolution and enables implicit concept computation. By bridging conceptual modeling with interpretive needs, HistLens broadens the analytical perspectives and methodological repertoire available to social science and the humanities for diachronic text analysis.

Abstract:
Training student models on synthetic data generated by strong teacher models is a promising approach to distilling the capabilities of teachers. However, existing studies reveal that stronger models are not always optimal teachers, suggesting a mismatch between the teacher’s output and the student’s learning ability. To address this issue, we propose PerSyn (Personalized data Synthesis), a novel and efficient approach that customizes synthetic data to align with the learning capabilities of the student model. Specifically, our PerSyn method routes each prompt to its optimal teacher via a query-level router that jointly considers the student models’ learnability and teacher models’ response quality. It successfully transfers the synthesis paradigm from the conventional "Generate then Select" to a more efficient manner, i.e., "Route then Generate", eliminating the need for all teacher models to generate parallel responses across the entire prompt set. Extensive experiments across different model families and scales demonstrate that PerSyn consistently outperforms all baselines on six benchmarks, including instruct tuning and math reasoning settings. Further analysis verifies the effectiveness of PerSyn and offers extra insights to propel future research. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PerSyn-8D85.

Abstract:
As LLM-based agents are increasingly used in long-term interactions, cumulative memory is critical for enabling personalization and maintaining stylistic consistency. However, most existing systems adopt an "all-or-nothing" approach to memory usage: incorporating all relevant past information can lead to Memory Anchoring, where the agent is trapped by past interactions, while excluding memory entirely results in under-utilization and the loss of important interaction history. We show that an agent’s reliance on memory can be modeled as an explicit and user-controllable dimension. We first introduce a behavioral metric of memory dependence to quantify the influence of past interactions on current outputs. We then propose Steerable Memory Agent, SteeM, a framework that allows users to dynamically regulate memory reliance, ranging from a fresh-start mode that promotes innovation to a high-fidelity mode that closely follows interaction history. Experiments across different scenarios demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms conventional prompting and rigid memory masking strategies, yielding a more nuanced and effective control for personalized human-agent collaboration.

Abstract:
Hallucinations remain a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) settings where models may generate outputs unsupported by the provided context. To address this, we introduce TOHA, a TOpology-based HAllucination detector, which leverages a topological divergence metric to quantify the structural properties of graphs induced by attention matrices. Examining the topological divergence between prompt and response subgraphs in RAG settings reveals consistent patterns: higher divergence values in specific attention heads correlate with unfaithful outputs, independent of the dataset. Extensive experiments — including evaluations on question answering and summarization tasks — show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art or competitive results on several benchmarks while requiring minimal annotated data and computational resources. Our findings indicate that the topological structure of attention matrices provides an efficient and robust metric for assessing the correctness of LLM’s responses.

Abstract:
The “LLM-as-a-judge” paradigm has become a standard method for evaluating open-ended generation. To address the quadratic scalability costs of pairwise comparisons, popular benchmarks like Arena-Hard and AlpacaEval compare all models against a single anchor. However, despite its widespread use, the impact of anchor selection on the reliability of the results remains largely unexplored. In this work, we systematically investigate the effect of anchor selection by evaluating 22 different anchors on the Arena-Hard-v2.0 dataset. We find that the choice of anchor is critical: a poor anchor can dramatically reduce correlation with human rankings. We identify that common anchor choices (best-performing and worst-performing models) make poor anchors. Because these extreme anchors are consistently better or worse than all other models, they are seldom indicative of the relative ranking of the models. We further quantify the effect size of anchor selection, showing it is comparable to the selection of a judge model. We conclude with actionable recommendations. First, we conduct a power analysis, and compute sufficient benchmark sizes for anchor-based evaluation, finding that standard benchmark sizes are insufficient for pairwise evaluation and fail to distinguish between competitive models reliably. Second, we provide guidelines for selecting informative anchors to ensure reliable and efficient evaluation practices.

Abstract:
Question answering over visually rich documents (VRDs) requires reasoning not only over isolated content but also over documents’ structural organization and cross-page dependencies. However, conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods encode content in isolated chunks during ingestion, losing structural and cross-page dependencies, and retrieve a fixed number of pages at inference, regardless of the specific demands of the question or context. This often results in incomplete evidence retrieval and degraded answer quality for multi-page reasoning tasks. To address these limitations, we propose LAD-RAG, a novel Layout-Aware Dynamic RAG framework. During ingestion, LAD-RAG constructs a symbolic document graph that captures layout structure and cross-page dependencies, adding it alongside standard neural embeddings to yield a more holistic representation of the document. During inference, an LLM agent dynamically interacts with the neural and symbolic indices to adaptively retrieve the necessary evidence based on the query. Experiments on MMLongBench-Doc, LongDocURL, DUDE, and MP-DocVQA demonstrate that LAD-RAG improves retrieval, achieving over 90% perfect recall on average without any top- k tuning, and outperforming baseline retrievers by up to 20% in recall at comparable noise levels, yielding higher QA accuracy with minimal latency.

Abstract:
Language models (LMs) are increasingly used in collaboration: multiple LMs trained by different parties collaborate through routing systems, multi-agent debate, model merging, and more. Critical safety risks remain in this decentralized paradigm: what if some of the models in multi-LLM systems are compromised or malicious? We first quantify the impact of malicious models by engineering four categories of malicious LMs, plug them into four types of popular model collaboration systems, and evaluate the compromised system across 10 datasets. We find that malicious models have a severe impact on the multi-LLM systems, especially for reasoning and safety domains where performance is lowered by 7.12% and 7.94% on average. We then propose mitigation strategies to alleviate the impact of malicious components, by employing external supervisors that oversee model collaboration to disable/mask them out to reduce their influence. On average, these strategies recover 95.31% of the initial performance, while making model collaboration systems fully resistant to malicious models remains an open research question.

Abstract:
In Question Answering (QA), Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) has revolutionized performance in various domains. However, how to effectively capture multi-document relationships remains an open question. This is particularly critical for biomedical tasks due to their reliance on information spread across multiple documents. In this work, we propose a novel method CLAIMS, which utilizes propositional claims to construct a local knowledge graph from retrieved documents. Summaries are then derived via layerwise summarization from the knowledge graph to contextualize a small language model to perform QA. The structured summaries effectively capture explicit and implicit relationships between entities in the documents, thus having a more comprehensive context to provide to LLMs. CLAIMS achieved comparable or superior performance over RAG baselines on several biomedical QA benchmarks. We also evaluated its generalizability and each individual step of our approach with a targeted set of metrics, demonstrating its effectiveness.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to summarize academic work, yet model summaries can subtly exaggerate or mischaracterize findings. We examine how Narrative License (NL), rhetorical shifts that amplify claims beyond the underlying evidence, emerges in LLM summaries of scholarly articles. Using diverse prompting strategies across six leading models, we assess three dimensions of NL: causal overreach, rhetorical confidence, and sentiment (N = 100 peer-reviewed articles). Under basic summarization prompts, models frequently increase NL relative to academic abstracts; however, guardrail prompts can reduce these distortions. We further test how model "sycophancy" shapes NL, finding that stated stances and user personas produce predictable shifts in each element. These findings suggest that users and the benchmarks used to evaluate summarization should explicitly consider subtle rhetorical distortions and user alignment to ensure faithful scientific communication.

Abstract:
Much recent progress in Large Language Model (LLM) performance has been driven by verifiable feedback in deterministic domains like mathematics and code. However, scaling reinforcement learning (RL) and test-time compute in domains for which strict verification is infeasible remains a challenge. A common approach is to use an LLM-as-judge, which often relies on opaque, monolithic scores. In this work, we propose that AI feedback is most effective when decomposed into granular, prompt-specific checklists. To transform these checklists into a scalar reward, we introduce DIVA: DIscriminative VAriance weighting, a dynamic aggregation scheme that prioritises checklist items based on their ability to distinguish quality across a candidate pool. This ensures the reward signal focuses on the most salient criteria for a given prompt and response group, rather than being diluted by trivial or redundant constraints. Our approach yields an 11.8% win-rate improvement on AlpacaEval 2.0 using Qwen3-8B, outperforming holistic reward models and existing checklist baselines. Beyond training, we show that these checklists serve as a structured policy improvement operator at inference time - by using the model’s own checklist evaluation as localised contextual feedback, the model can iteratively refine its output. This self-correction mechanism outperforms free-form sequential self-correction, offering a unified and interpretable framework for scaling both training-time and test-time performance in domains lacking strict verifiers.

Abstract:
While the real world is inherently stochastic, Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly evaluated on single-round inference against fixed ground truths. In this work, we shift the lens to distribution alignment: assessing whether LLMs, when prompted repeatedly, can generate outputs that adhere to a desired target distribution, e.g. reflecting real-world statistics or a uniform distribution. We formulate distribution alignment using the attributes of gender, race, and sentiment within occupational contexts. Our empirical analysis reveals that off-the-shelf LLMs and standard alignment techniques, including prompt engineering and Direct Preference Optimization, fail to reliably control output distributions. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel fine-tuning framework that couples Steering Token Calibration with Semantic Alignment. We introduce a hybrid objective function combining Kullback-Leibler divergence to anchor the probability mass of latent steering tokens and Kahneman-Tversky Optimization to bind these tokens to semantically consistent responses. Experiments across six diverse datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baselines, achieving precise distributional control in attribute generation tasks.

Abstract:
While extensive research has evaluated LLMs on complex reasoning tasks, the foundational building blocks of logical reasoning remain underexplored. We introduce IIBench, a benchmark evaluating immediate inference (elementary operations over categorical propositions). Our evaluation reveals that even SoTA models exhibit systematic deficiencies in immediate inference, and establishes immediate inference as foundational: it mediates approximately 40% of the effect on syllogistic reasoning, with near-perfect correlation ( = 0.98) across reasoning benchmarks. Our analysis reveals that models lack robust operator grounding, oscillating between structural reasoning and surface pattern matching with inconsistent handling of quantifiers and negation.

Abstract:
Sentence-level explanations can miss the bigger picture of how a black-box model behaves across data, which matters most for complex criteria like safety that cannot be defined by a single rule. We trace Logit-Trajectory, which tracks adjacent-layer logit updates as vectors and aggregates them into a reproducible dataset-level trajectory pattern, enabling depth-wise explainability through signals such as coherence and angular rotation. Across 6 languages and 5 NLP tasks, we show these trajectory summaries reveal consistent depth-wise patterns that divergence- and similarity-based baselines often wash out due to scalarization. As a case study where dataset-level intermediate decision structure matters, we evaluate safety classification, reporting both trajectory-level visual separability and classification performance.

Abstract:
Protecting public figures from online abuse requires models that go beyond post-level classification to determine whether abuse is directed at a designated target, characterize the abuse intent, and extract textual evidence. We introduce a Target-Aware Multilingual Abuse (TAMA), benchmark of 9,386 X (Twitter) posts aimed at public figures, with aligned supervision for (i) tri-class target detection, (ii) 12-way fine-grained abuse type classification, and (iii) phrase-level abusive spans localization. To exploit the hierarchical coupling of these tasks, we propose Cascaded-MTL, a dependency-aware multi-task framework that conditions downstream predictions on upstream beliefs via three lightweight modules: Cross-Task Feature Fusion (CTF), Task-Adaptive Gating (TAG), and Label-Guided Span Detection (LGSD). Experiments across three multilingual encoders show that Cascaded-MTL consistently yields higher average F1 than single-task and standard multi-task training and delivers robust gains on type classification and span localization. The code and the dataset are released here: https://github.com/zgjiangtoby/CASCADED-MTL

Abstract:
LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving complex tasks. Central to MAS is the communication topology which governs how agents exchange information internally. Consequently, the security of communication topologies has attracted increasing attention. In this paper, we investigate a critical privacy risk: MAS communication topologies can be inferred under a restrictive black-box setting, exposing system vulnerabilities and posing significant intellectual property threats. To explore this risk, we propose Communication Inference Attack (CIA) , a novel attack that constructs new adversarial queries to induce intermediate agents’ reasoning outputs and models their semantic correlations through the proposed global bias disentanglement and LLM-guided weak supervision. Extensive experiments on MAS with optimized communication topologies demonstrate the effectiveness of CIA, achieving an average AUC of 0.87 and a peak AUC of up to 0.99, thereby revealing the substantial privacy risk in MAS. The source code is available at https://github.com/aabbbcd/CIA .

Abstract:
With the rise of short-video platforms, hate speech has evolved from static text and memes into more covert and aggressive hateful video formats, profoundly impacting social dynamics and public sentiment. Existing detection methods typically rely on multimodal feature fusion, which blurs the distinct boundaries of modality-specific information. This leads to the feature dilution problem, where dominant benign modalities often overwhelm sparse, localized hateful cues. To address this, we propose SAGE (Synergistic Adaptive Gating of Experts), a novel framework that shifts the paradigm from blind feature mixing to decision-level arbitration. Mimicking human cognitive processes, SAGE instantiates disentangled experts to rigorously preserve modality-specific semantics, facilitates global expert deliberation for context-aware refinement, and convenes an instance-level tribunal to dynamically arbitrate the final verdict based on evidentiary salience. Extensive experiments on HateMM and MultiHateClip benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving accuracy gains of 6.37% to 21.23% and macro-F1 score gains of 6.77% to 28.01%.

Abstract:
Recent advancements have expanded the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in board games from playing agents to creative co-designers. However, a critical gap remains: current systems lack the capacity to offer constructive critique grounded in the emergent user experience. Bridging this gap is fundamental for harmonizing Human-AI collaboration, as it empowers designers to refine their creations via external perspectives while steering models away from biased or unpredictable outcomes. Automating this evaluation presents two challenges: inferring the latent dynamics connecting static rules to gameplay without an explicit engine, and modeling the subjective heterogeneity of diverse player groups. To address these, we curate a comprehensive dataset of 1,727 structurally corrected rulebooks and 150K reviews selected via rigorous quality scoring and facet-aware sampling. We augment this data with Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics (MDA) reasoning to explicitly bridge the causal gap between written rules and player experience. We further distill distinct player personas and introduce MeepleLM, a specialized model that internalizes persona-specific reasoning patterns to accurately simulate the subjective feedback of diverse player archetypes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MeepleLM significantly outperforms latest commercial models (e.g., GPT-5.1, Gemini3-Pro) in community alignment and critique quality, achieving a 70% preference rate in user studies assessing practical utility. MeepleLM serves as a reliable virtual playtester that provides experience-grounded feedback, offering a practical step towards audience-aligned Human-AI collaboration.

Abstract:
Empathy relies on the cognitive capacity to relate to similar past experiences. Consequently, retrieval-based approaches utilize analogous exemplars to guide empathetic dialogue generation. However, existing methods prioritize semantic similarity over emotion characteristics, often leading to unempathetic responses. To address this, we propose REG, a framework that integrates four Emotion Attributes into the retrieval process to ensure explicit emotional alignment. Furthermore, to mitigate the noise and limited diversity caused by coarse-grained sentence-level attributes, we incorporate Token-level Retrieval for finer granularity and a Retrieval Candidate Augmentation strategy to enhance diversity. Empirical results on the EmpatheticDialogues dataset demonstrate that REG significantly outperforms baselines, offering a robust solution for empathetic generation.

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) are crucial for the training of large language models (LLMs), yet they typically rely on large-scale human-annotated preference pairs. With the widespread deployment of LLMs, in-the-wild interactions have emerged as a rich source of implicit reward signals. This raises the question: Can we develop reward models directly from in-the-wild interactions? In this work, we explore this possibility by adopting WildChat as an interaction source and proposing a pipeline to extract reliable human feedback, yielding 186k high-quality instances for training WildReward via ordinal regression directly on user feedback without preference pairs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that WildReward achieves comparable or even superior performance compared to conventional reward models, with improved calibration and cross-sample consistency. We also observe that WildReward benefits directly from user diversity, where more users yield stronger reward models. Finally, we apply WildReward to online DPO training and observe significant improvements across various downstream tasks. We will release our code, data, and models to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Reading order detection is the foundation of document understanding.Most existing methods rely on uniform supervision, implicitly assuming a constant difficulty distribution across layout regions. In this work, we challenge this assumption by revealing a critical flaw: Positional Disparity, a phenomenon where models demonstrate mastery over the deterministic start and end regions but suffer a performance collapse in the complex intermediate sections.This degradation arises because standard training allows the massive volume of easy patterns to drown out the learning signals from difficult layouts.To address this, we propose FocalOrder, a framework driven by Focal Preference Optimization (FPO).Specifically, FocalOrder employs adaptive difficulty discovery with exponential moving average mechanism to dynamically pinpoint hard-to-learn transitions, while introducing a difficulty-calibrated pairwise ranking objective to enforce global logical consistency.Extensive experiments demonstrate that FocalOrder establishes new state-of-the-art results on OmniDocBench v1.0 and Comp-HRDoc.Our compact model not only outperforms competitive specialized baselines but also significantly surpasses large-scale general VLMs.These results demonstrate that aligning the optimization with intrinsic structural ambiguity of documents is critical for mastering complex document structures.

Abstract:
Educational NLP systems are typically evaluated using engagement metrics and satisfaction surveys, which are at best a proxy for meeting pedagogical goals. We introduce six computational metrics for automated evaluation of pedagogical alignment in student-AI dialogue. We validate our metrics through analysis of 12,650 messages across 500 conversations from four courses. Using our metrics, we identify a fundamental misalignment: educators design conversational tutors for sustained learning dialogue, but students mainly use them for answer-extraction. Deployment context is the strongest predictor of usage patterns, outweighing student preference or system design: when AI tools are optional, usage concentrates around deadlines; when integrated into course structure, students ask for solutions to verbatim assignment questions. Whole-dialogue evaluation misses these turn-by-turn patterns. Our metrics will enable researchers building educational dialogue systems to measure whether they are achieving their pedagogical goals.

Abstract:
LLM serving is limited by provider-side resources: longer generations consume more GPU time, increase latency, and reduce throughput in multi-tenant systems. This creates a denial-of-service (DoS) risk, where attackers degrade service by inducing excessive generation. Prior work on LLM DoS primarily relies on adversarial perturbations that delay end-of-sequence termination. We show perturbations are often unnecessary: natural, benign-looking instructions that specify impractical and meaningless tasks can already trigger excessive generation. To study this overlooked vulnerability, we introduce , an adversarial dataset of natural, instruction-based DoS prompts. Starting from a human-curated seed set spanning diverse attack categories, we design a multi-agent synthesis framework to scale the dataset while preserving malicious intent and increasing semantic diversity. Experiments across a wide range of proprietary and open-source LLMs show that NaturalSloth consistently induces excessive generation, with attack effectiveness further amplified when combined with jailbreak techniques. Our analysis also reveals significant limitations of existing defenses, highlighting the need for dedicated protections against natural DoS attacks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation can replicate insecure patterns from their training data. To mitigate this, a common strategy for security hardening is to fine-tune models using supervision derived from the final transformer layer. However, this design may suffer from a final-layer bottleneck: vulnerability-discriminative cues can be distributed across layers and become less detectable near the output representations optimized for next-token prediction. To diagnose this issue, we perform layer-wise linear probing. We observe that vulnerability-related signals are most detectable in a band of intermediate-to-upper layers yet attenuate toward the final layers. Motivated by this observation, we introduce DeepGuard, a framework that leverages distributed security-relevant cues by aggregating representations from multiple upper layers via an attention-based module. The aggregated signal powers a dedicated security analyzer within a multi-objective training objective that balances security enhancement and functional correctness, and further supports a lightweight inference-time steering strategy. Extensive experiments across five code LLMs demonstrate that DeepGuard improves the secure-and-correct generation rate by an average of 11.9% over strong baselines such as SVEN. It also preserves functional correctness while exhibiting generalization to held-out vulnerability types.

Abstract:
Effective medical text retrieval requires both high accuracy and low latency. While LLM-based embedding models possess powerful retrieval capabilities, their prohibitive latency and high computational cost limit their application in real-time scenarios. Furthermore, the lack of comprehensive and high-fidelity benchmarks hinders progress in Chinese medical text retrieval. In this work, we introduce the Chinese Medical Text Embedding Benchmark (CMedTEB), a benchmark spanning three kinds of practical embedding tasks: retrieval, reranking, and semantic textual similarity (STS). Distinct from purely automated datasets, CMedTEB is curated via a rigorous multi-LLM voting pipeline validated by clinical experts, ensuring gold-standard label quality while effectively mitigating annotation noise. On this foundation, we propose the Chinese Medical Asymmetric REtriever (CARE), an asymmetric architecture that pairs a lightweight BERT-style encoder for online query encoding with a powerful LLM-based encoder for offline document encoding. However, optimizing such an asymmetric retriever with two structurally different encoders presents distinctive challenges. To address this, we introduce a novel two-stage training strategy that progressively bridges the query and document representations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CARE surpasses state-of-the-art symmetric models on CMedTEB, achieving superior retrieval performance without increasing inference latency.

Abstract:
Multi-hop question answering requires retrieving and integrating evidence from multiple contexts. Despite the rapid progress of current research, multi-hop reasoning remains constrained by two persistent limitations: attention decay, where the model’s focus on main question degrades as the reasoning chain grows, and error accumulation, where mistakes propagate across hops and compounds into final failure. Inspired by Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillation which decouples global planning from local retrieval, enabling efficient attention transfer between hops and a verification and repair mechanism that interrupts the accumulation of errors in the wrong paths, we present THOR, a brain-inspired Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillatory reasoning framework. Extensive comparative experiments and specific validation experiments on multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that THOR improves answer accuracy and robustness while mitigating limitations, showcasing its generalization across different backbones.

Abstract:
Reasoning segmentation requires models to ground complex, implicit textual queries into precise pixel-level masks. Existing approaches rely on a single segmentation token \ , whose hidden state implicitly encodes both semantic reasoning and spatial localization, limiting the model’s ability to explicitly disentangle what to segment from where to segment. We introduce AnchorSeg, which reformulates reasoning segmentation as a structured conditional generation process over image tokens, conditioned on language grounded query banks. Instead of compressing all semantic reasoning and spatial localization into a single embedding, AnchorSeg constructs an ordered sequence of query banks: latent reasoning tokens that capture intermediate semantic states, and a segmentation anchor token that provides explicit spatial grounding. We model spatial conditioning as a factorized distribution over image tokens, where the anchor query determines localization signals while contextual queries provide semantic modulation. To bridge token-level predictions and pixel-level supervision, we propose Token–Mask Cycle Consistency (TMCC), a bidirectional training objective that enforces alignment across resolutions. By explicitly decoupling spatial grounding from semantic reasoning through structured language grounded query banks, AnchorSeg achieves state-of-the-art results on ReasonSeg test set (67.7% gIoU and 68.1% cIoU). All code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/rui-qian/AnchorSeg.

Abstract:
Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) relies on accurately selecting user-relevant documents. In practice, existing RAG approaches often suffer from high retrieval costs and overlook that collaborative signals from similar users can enhance personalized generation for the current user. We propose ClusterRAG, a Cluster-Based Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Retrieval-Augmented Generation. ClusterRAG represents users through their profile documents, organizes users into semantically coherent clusters using density-based clustering, and performs retrieval at both the cluster and document levels via cluster-level similarity and fine-grained ranking. Extensive experiments on the LaMP benchmark demonstrate that jointly leveraging the target user’s profile and profiles from top similar users consistently yields the best performance across diverse tasks. Further analysis shows that ClusterRAG integrates seamlessly with different dense retrievers and rankers, and remains effective when paired with both fine-tuned and zero-shot language models.

Abstract:
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have recently become a promising alternative to autoregressive large language models (ARMs). Semi-autoregressive (Semi-AR) decoding is widely employed in base dLLMs and advanced decoding strategies due to its superior performance. However, our observations reveal that Semi-AR decoding suffers from inherent block constraints, which cause the decoding of many cross-block stable tokens to be unnecessarily delayed. To address this challenge, we systematically investigate the identification of stable tokens and present three key findings: (1) naive lookahead decoding is unreliable, (2) token stability closely correlates with convergence trend, and (3) historical information is isolated. Building on these insights, we propose Anchor-based History-stable Decoding (AHD), a training-free, plug-and-play dynamic decoding strategy. Specifically, AHD monitors the stability trend of tokens in real time through dynamic anchors. Once a token reaches stability, it initiates early cross-block decoding to enhance efficiency and performance. Extensive experiments across language, vision-language, and audio-language domains demonstrate that AHD simultaneously improves both performance and inference efficiency. Notably, AHD effectively reverses the performance degradation typically observed in existing advanced decoding acceleration strategies. For instance, on the BBH benchmark, our approach reduces decoding steps by 80% while improving performance by 3.67%.

Abstract:
Recent Audio-Visual Question Answering (AVQA) methods have advanced significantly. However, most AVQA methods lack effective mechanisms for handling missing modalities, suffering from severe performance degradation in real-world scenarios with data interruptions. Furthermore, prevailing methods for handling missing modalities predominantly rely on generative imputation to synthesize missing features. While partially effective, these methods tend to capture inter-modal commonalities but struggle to acquire unique, modality-specific knowledge within the missing data, leading to hallucinations and compromised reasoning accuracy. To tackle these challenges, we propose R 2 ScP, a novel framework that shifts the paradigm of missing modality handling from traditional generative imputation to retrieval-based recovery. Specifically, we leverage cross-modal retrieval via unified semantic embeddings to acquire missing domain-specific knowledge. To maximize semantic restoration, we introduce a context-aware adaptive purification mechanism that eliminates latent semantic noise within the retrieved data. Additionally, we employ a two-stage training strategy to explicitly model the semantic relationships between knowledge from different sources. Extensive experiments demonstrate that R 2 ScP significantly improves AVQA and enhances robustness in modal-incomplete scenarios.

Abstract:
Sign language translation (SLT) is essential for bridging communication between the deaf and hearing communities, but real-world deployment suffers from domain shift such as signer variability, lighting, and background changes. Supervised fine-tuning is impractical due to limited labeled data, and existing unsupervised adaptation methods require batch statistics or long adaptation. We introduce Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) for SLT, enabling rapid adaptation to domain shift without the need for labeled data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to explore TTA in SLT. Existing TTA methods predominantly focus on image classification tasks and lack a comprehensive strategy for handling domain shift in SLT. In response, we introduce SAME, a plug-and-play, signer-aware Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) TTA architecture for SLT. SAME inserts lightweight MoE modules after multiple encoder layers. Gates are conditioned on signer features and stabilized with unsupervised regularizers, effectively decoupling domain shift across encoder depths while enabling personalized adaptation. Experiments show that SAME outperforms existing TTA methods and can enhance the capabilities of multiple SLT models.

Abstract:
Knowledge editing is a promising method for updating Large Language Models efficiently. However, previous studies often suffer from poor specificity in continual editing, as they typically focus on single edits or preventing knowledge forgetting. To address this, we propose TamEdit, a trajectory-aware meta-learning method that preserves specificity for continual knowledge editing. TamEdit unifies three levels: Inner Optimization performs multi-step fast fine-tuning on the single edit; Trajectory-based Editing unifies continual edits with a growing memory; and Outer Optimization leverages meta-learning to distill cross-task strategies for preserving specificity. By capturing the relationships between different single edits within the trajectory, our method learns how to effectively avoid specificity drift. Experiments across multiple LLMs show TamEdit significantly outperforms baselines in continual editing, improving specificity by 14.81% with fast speed (requiring only 8.84% of the time cost of most baselines), while preserving general capabilities.

Abstract:
The global deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) underscores the urgent need to evaluate their cultural alignment. However, assessing genuine "cultural awareness" across modalities (text, vision, speech) and languages remains a significant challenge. To comprehensively investigate this domain, we propose MMAC, a systematic framework that encompasses a tri-modally aligned cultural benchmark creation pipeline and a five-dimensional evaluation protocol to assess cross-country awareness disparities, evaluate cross-lingual and cross-modal consistency, and verify cultural knowledge generalization and grounding validity. Given the prevailing Western cultural bias in current models, we focus on 8 Asian countries as our dataset foundation to more acutely reveal potential cultural deficiencies in LLMs. Our dataset, MMAC-bench, features 27,000 human-curated questions across 10 languages. Crucially, it is the first dataset aligned at the input level across text, image, and speech, enabling direct cross-modal transfer tests. Each question consists of multiple-choice options accompanied by open-ended generated explanations, where 79% require multi-step reasoning grounded in cultural context, moving beyond simple memorization. We probe the causes of modal divergence, offering insights into fostering culturally robust MLLMs.

Abstract:
Continual Pre-training (CPT) serves as a fundamental approach for adapting foundation models to domain-specific applications. Scaling laws for pre-training define a power-law relationship between dataset size and the test loss of an LLM. However, the marginal gains from simply increasing data for CPT diminish rapidly, yielding suboptimal data utilization and inefficient training. To address this challenge, we propose a novel perplexity-aware data scaling law to establish a predictive relationship between the perplexity landscape of domain-specific data and the test loss. Our approach leverages the pre-trained model’s own perplexity on domain data as a proxy for estimating the knowledge gap, effectively quantifying the informational perplexity landscape of candidate training samples. By fitting this scaling law across diverse perplexity regimes, we enable adaptive selection of high-utility data subsets, prioritizing content that maximizes knowledge absorption while minimizing redundancy and noise. Extensive experiments on both medical and general-domain benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently identifies near-optimal training subsets, achieving superior performance with significantly reduced data consumption.

Abstract:
Efficient reproduction of research papers is pivotal to accelerating scientific progress. However, the increasing complexity of proposed methods often renders reproduction a labor-intensive endeavor, necessitating profound domain expertise.To address this, we introduce the paper lineage, which systematically mines implicit knowledge from the cited literature. This algorithm serves as the backbone of our proposed , a multi-agent framework designed to autonomously reproduce experimental code in a complete, end-to-end manner. To ensure code executability, incorporates a sampling-based unit testing strategy for rapid validation. To assess reproduction capabilities, we introduce , a benchmark featuring verified implementations, alongside comprehensive metrics for evaluating both reproduction and execution fidelity. Extensive evaluations on PaperBench and demonstrate that consistently surpasses existing baselines across all metrics. Notably, it yields substantial improvements in reproduction fidelity and final execution performance. The code is available at https://github.com/AI9Stars/AutoReproduce .

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) based listwise ranking has shown superior performance in many passage ranking tasks. With the development of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), many studies have demonstrated that step-by-step reasoning during test-time helps improve listwise ranking performance. However, due to the scarcity of reasoning-intensive training data, existing rerankers perform poorly in many complex ranking scenarios, and the ranking ability of reasoning-intensive rerankers remains largely underdeveloped. In this paper, we first propose an automated reasoning-intensive training data synthesis framework, which sources training queries and passages from diverse domains and applies DeepSeek-R1 to generate high-quality training labels. To empower the listwise reranker with strong reasoning ability, we further propose a two-stage training approach, which includes a cold-start supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage and a reinforcement learning (RL) stage. During the RL stage, we design a novel multi-view ranking reward tailored to the multi-turn nature of listwise ranking. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our trained reasoning-intensive reranker ReasonRank outperforms existing baselines significantly and also achieves much lower latency than the pointwise reranker.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit substantial variability in performance and computational cost across tasks and queries, motivating routing systems that select models to meet user-specific cost–performance trade-offs. However, existing routers generalize poorly in cold-start scenarios where in-domain training data is unavailable. We address this limitation with a multi-level task-profile–guided data synthesis framework that constructs a hierarchical task taxonomy and produces diverse question–answer pairs to approximate the test-time query distribution. Building on this, we introduce TRouter, a task-type–aware router approach that models query-conditioned cost and performance via latent task-type variables, with prior regularization derived from the synthesized task taxonomy. This design enhances TRouter’s routing utility under both cold-start and in-domain settings. Across multiple benchmarks, we show that our synthesis framework alleviates cold-start issues and that TRouter delivers effective LLM routing.

Abstract:
Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as an efficient paradigm for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its efficacy is primarily confined to domains with verifiable ground truths. Extending GRPO to open-domain settings remains a critical challenge, as unconstrained generation entails multi-faceted and often conflicting objectives—such as creativity versus factuality—where rigid, static reward scalarization is inherently suboptimal. To address this, we propose MAESTRO (Meta-learning Adaptive Estimation of Scalarization Trade-offs for Reward Optimization), which introduces a meta-cognitive orchestration layer that treats reward scalarization as a dynamic latent policy, leveraging the model’s terminal hidden states as a semantic bottleneck to perceive task-specific priorities. We formulate this as a contextual bandit problem within a bi-level optimization framework, where a lightweight Conductor network co-evolves with the policy by utilizing group-relative advantages as a meta-reward signal. Across seven benchmarks, MAESTRO consistently outperforms single-reward and static multi-objective baselines, while preserving the efficiency advantages of GRPO, and in some settings even reducing redundant generation.

Abstract:
While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly advanced Computer-Using Agents (CUAs), current agentic frameworks struggle with robustness in novel domains and long-horizon workflows due to the absence of visual-aware tutorial retrieval and the lack of granular control over historical visual context curation and pruning. To bridge these gaps, we introduce OS-Symphony, a holistic framework that comprises an Orchestrator coordinating two key innovations for robust automation: (1) a Reflection-Memory Agent that utilizes milestone-driven long-term memory to enable trajectory-level self-correction, effectively mitigating visual context loss in long-horizon tasks; (2) Versatile Tool Agents featuring a Multimodal Searcher that adopts a “SeeAct” paradigm to navigate a browser-based sandbox to synthesize live, visually aligned tutorials, thereby resolving fidelity issues in unseen scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that OS-Symphony delivers substantial performance gains across varying model scales, establishing new state-of-the-art results on three online benchmarks, notably achieving 65.84% on OSWorld. All research assets will be made publicly available.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) that fluently converse with humans are a reality - but do LLMs experience human-like processing difficulties? We systematically compare human and LLM sentence comprehension across seven challenging linguistic structures. We collect sentence comprehension data from humans and five families of state-of-the-art LLMs, varying in size and training procedure in a unified experimental framework. Our results show LLMs overall struggle on the target structures, but especially on garden path (GP) sentences. Indeed, while the strongest models achieve near perfect accuracy on non-GP structures (93.7% for GPT-5), they struggle on GP structures (46.8% for GPT-5). Additionally, when ranking structures based on average performance, rank correlation between humans and models increases with parameter count. For each target structure, we also collect data for their matched baseline without the difficult structure. Comparing performance on the target vs. baseline sentences, the performance gap observed in humans holds for LLMs, with two exceptions: for models that are too weak performance is uniformly low across both sentence types, and for models that are too strong the performance is uniformly high. Together, these reveal convergence and divergence in human and LLM sentence comprehension, offering new insights into the similarity of humans and LLMs.

Abstract:
Prompt-based in-context learning (ICL) and parameter fine-tuning are two dominant paradigms for incorporating external information into large language models (LLMs), but they incur high inference costs or require expensive retraining. To bridge this gap, context-to-parameter mapping converts prompts into temporary adapter weights. However, we identify a critical failure mode in existing methods: hidden-state collapse, where the adapter-augmented model’s internal states diverge sharply from the full-context oracle in deeper layers. We trace this failure to two coupled gaps: suboptimal Input-Selection and inadequate Supervision-Signal. To address these issues, we propose SADA (State-Aligned Distillation Adapters). We establish the attention-block output as a principled feature interface to improve input selection and introduce state-alignment distillation to enforce consistency between the adapter-augmented model and the full-context oracle. Experiments on long-context language modeling (PG19) and downstream NLU and summarization benchmarks show that SADA consistently outperforms strong baselines like StreamAdapter and GenerativeAdapter, achieving performance comparable to ICL while significantly reducing memory footprint and latency. We further analyze when parameterized context compression is effective and when explicit context retention remains preferable. Our code is available at [https://github.com/Taylor-Gavel/SADA.git](https://github.com/Taylor-Gavel/SADA.git).

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning for LLM agents is typically conducted on a static data distribution, which fails to adapt to the agent’s evolving behavior and leads to poor coverage of complex environment interactions. To address these challenges, we propose CoEvolve, an agent-data mutual evolution framework that enables LLM agents to improve through closed-loop, interaction-driven training. Specifically, CoEvolve extracts feedback signals such as forgetting and uncertainty from rollout trajectories to identify failure-prone interaction patterns, and utilizes them to guide LLM-based task synthesis. The synthesized tasks are validated through environment interaction and utilized to update the data distribution, enabling joint adaptation of the agent and its data. Extensive experiments on AppWorld and BFCL across Qwen2.5-7B, Qwen3-4B, and Qwen3-30B-A3B demonstrate consistent and significant improvements over strong base models, yielding absolute gains of 19.43%, 15.58%, and 18.14%, respectively.

Abstract:
In high-precision scenarios, vision language models suffer from Linguistic Priors Hallucination. When processing familiar text, models tend to over-rely on internal parametric knowledge, effectively "reciting" the content rather than "reading" the image. In this paper, we first systematically investigate this phenomenon by constructing the GlitchText Probing Dataset. We discover that the model’s reliance on visual grounding diminishes significantly as the generation length increases. To mitigate this, we propose PAR (Positional Perturbation and Attention Recycling), a training-free, inference-time intervention framework. PAR consists of two parts: (1) Positional Perturbation (PP) injects structured phase noise into the rotary positional embeddings; (2) Foveal Attention Recycling (FAR) detects over-confident linguistic priors and dynamically redistributes attention mass back to important visual regions. Extensive experiments across state-of-the-art models, demonstrate that PAR significantly reduces hallucination rates (reducing CER by 12%), particularly in long-context scenarios, while maintaining robust generalization on standard benchmarks.

Abstract:
Building effective knowledge graphs (KGs) for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is pivotal for advancing question answering (QA) systems. However, its effectiveness is hindered by a fundamental disconnect: the knowledge graph (KG) construction process is decoupled from its downstream application, yielding suboptimal graph structures. To bridge this gap, we introduce AutoGraph-R1, the first framework to directly optimize KG construction for task performance using Reinforcement Learning (RL). AutoGraph-R1 trains an LLM constructor by framing graph generation as a policy learning problem, where the reward is derived from the graph’s functional utility in a RAG pipeline. We design two novel, task-aware reward functions, one for graphs as knowledge carriers and another as knowledge indices. Across multiple QA benchmarks, AutoGraph-R1 consistently enables graph RAG methods to achieve significant performance gains over using task-agnostic baseline graphs. Our work shows it is possible to close the loop between construction and application, shifting the paradigm from building intrinsically ‘good‘ graphs to building demonstrably ‘useful‘ ones.

Abstract:
Autoformalization aims to bridge the gap between human mathematical intuition and formal proof by automating the translation of informal reasoning into machine-verifiable languages. Despite significant breakthroughs catalyzed by Large Language Models (LLMs), autoformalizing Combinatorics remains a formidable challenge due to its intricate structural dependencies and the severe scarcity of high-quality formal datasets. To address these challenges, we propose SAIR-Comb, a Structure-Aware Iterative Refinement framework for Combinatorics powered by Lean 4 and LLMs. SAIR-Comb employs a multi-stage pipeline: first, it performs data augmentation and refinement by rectifying syntactic, semantic, and structural errors, guided by a curated manual combinatorics dataset. The model then undergoes a two-stage training regime: expert iteration with syntactic grounding, followed by reinforcement learning (RL) to align formal reasoning trajectories. Furthermore, we introduce Structural Consistency—a rigorous new metric designed to expose formalizing failures that elude traditional semantic-only evaluations. Experiments demonstrate that SAIR-Comb achieves strong performance on the specialized CombiBench while remaining highly competitive on general-domain benchmarks, including PutnamBench and ProverBench.

Abstract:
While neural ranking models (NRMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in information retrieval, they remain highly vulnerable to imperceptible adversarial perturbations. Existing defenses are predominantly data-centric, exemplified by adversarial training, which requires constructing large collections of adversarial examples. By treating NRMs as black boxes and indiscriminately optimizing all model parameters, these methods incur substantial computational cost and often degrade performance on clean data due to overfitting. In this paper, we advocate that adversarial vulnerability is not uniformly distributed across model parameters, but instead originates from specific internal units. We propose a paradigm shift toward a model-centric defense that addresses vulnerability at its architectural source, without requiring costly retraining or adversarial data generation. Specifically, we introduce Search in the Model, a novel training-free framework that performs fine-grained identification and rectification of vulnerable neurons directly within the model. By formulating neuron identification as a ranking problem, we develop a maximum marginal vulnerability criterion to precisely locate the top- K neurons most responsible for model vulnerability, and apply targeted neuronal inverse perturbation to correct them. Extensive experiments on MS MARCO and TREC 19 show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both defense efficiency and robustness to seen and unseen attacks, while preserving strong performance on clean data.

Abstract:
Vision-language models are increasingly deployed as computer-use agents (CUAs) that operate desktops and browsers. Top-performing CUAs are framework-based systems that decompose planning and execution, while end-to-end screenshot-to-action policies are easier to deploy but lag behind on benchmarks such as OSWorld-Verified. GUI datasets like OSWorld pose two bottlenecks: they expose only a few hundred interactive, verifiable tasks and environments, and expert trajectories must be gathered by interacting with these environments, making such data hard to scale. We therefore ask how reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) can best exploit a small pool of exist expert trajectories to train end-to-end policies. Na"ively mixing these off-policy traces into on-policy RLVR is brittle: even after format conversion, expert trajectories exhibit structural mismatch and distribution shift from the learner. We propose BEPA ( Bi -Level E xpert-to- P olicy A ssimilation), which turns static expert traces into policy-aligned guidance via self-rolled reachable trajectories under the base policy (LEVEL-1) and a per-task, dynamically updated cache used in RLVR (LEVEL-2). On OSWorld-Verified, BEPA improves UITARS1.5-7B success from 22.87% to 32.13% and raises a held-out split from 5.74% to 10.30%, with consistent gains on MMBench-GUI and Online-Mind2Web. Our code and data are available at an anonymous repository: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ACL_BEPA .

Abstract:
While LLMs are increasingly used in commercial services, they pose privacy risks such as leakage of sensitive personally identifiable information (PII). For LLMs trained on multilingual corpora, Multilingual Machine Unlearning (MMU) aims to remove information across multiple languages. However, prior MMU evaluations fail to capture such cross-linguistic distribution of information, being largely limited to direct extensions of per-language evaluation protocols. To this end, we propose two metrics to evaluate the information spread across languages: the Knowledge Separability Score (KSS) and the Knowledge Persistence Score (KPS). KSS measures the overall unlearning quality across multiple languages, while KPS more specifically aims to assess consistent removal of information among different language pairs. We evaluated various unlearning methods in the multilingual setting with these metrics and conducted comprehensive analyses. Through our investigation, we provide insights into unique phenomena exclusive to MMU and offer a new perspective on MMU evaluation.

Abstract:
LLM agents have emerged as powerful systems for tackling multi-turn tasks by interleaving internal reasoning and external tool interactions. Agentic Reinforcement Learning has recently drawn significant research attention as a critical post-training paradigm to further refine these capabilities. In this paper, we present AT²PO (Agentic Turn-based Policy Optimization via Tree Search), a unified framework for multi-turn agentic RL that addresses three core challenges: limited exploration diversity, sparse credit assignment, and misaligned policy optimization. AT²PO introduces a turn-level tree structure that jointly enables Entropy-Guided Tree Expansion for strategic exploration and Turn-wise Credit Assignment for fine-grained reward propagation from sparse outcomes. Complementing this, we propose Agentic Turn-based Policy Optimization, a turn-level learning objective that aligns policy updates with the natural decision granularity of agentic interactions. ATPO is orthogonal to tree search and can be readily integrated into any multi-turn RL pipeline. Experiments across seven benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over the state-of-the-art baseline by up to 1.84 percentage points in average, with ablation studies validating the effectiveness of each component.

Abstract:
Standard Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training typically treats corpora as flattened token sequences, often overlooking the real-world context that humans naturally rely on to contextualize information. To bridge this gap, we introduce Knowledge Coordinate Conditioning (KoCo), a simple method that maps every document into a three-dimensional semantic coordinate. By prepending these coordinates as textual prefixes for pre-training, we aim to equip the model with explicit contextual awareness to learn the documents within the real-world knowledge structure. Experiment results demonstrate that KoCo significantly enhances performance across 10 downstream tasks and accelerates pre-training convergence by approximately 30%. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that explicitly modeling knowledge coordinates helps the model distinguish stable facts from noise, effectively mitigating hallucination in generated outputs.

Abstract:
Process supervision has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing LLM reasoning, yet existing methods fail to distinguish meaningful progress from mere verbosity, leading to limited reasoning capabilities and unresolved token inefficiency. To address this, we propose Stage-aware Hierarchical Advantage via Potential Estimation (SHAPE), a framework that formalizes reasoning as a trajectory through a state space of empirical solvability. SHAPE introduces a hierarchical credit assignment mechanism: at the segment level, it employs a stage-aware advantage function to prioritize efficient breakthroughs in low-potential states; at the token level, it utilizes entropy-driven redistribution to sharpen execution signals. Extensive experiments in math reasoning across three base models and five benchmarks demonstrate that SHAPE achieves an average accuracy gain of 3% with 30% reduced token consumption.

Abstract:
Visual Language Models (VLMs) have become a robust foundation for document question answering. Processing long documents remains challenging due to limited context windows and computational budgets. Existing page-level retrieval methods offer a practical solution, typically encoding pages and queries into vectors and ranking them via cosine similarity. However, such embedding-based methods (i) lack query–page interaction before similarity scoring and (ii) usually require large-scale datasets to align visual and textual embeddings. In this paper, we observe that the cross-modal attention maps of well-trained VLMs are able to highlight semantically relevant regions. Building on this insight, we present CAPS (Cross-modal Attention as Page Selector), a retrieval framework that utilizes attention mechanisms inside VLMs for page selection. Specifically, CAPS first enhances attention-based retrieval capability with a small amount of contrastive data, then identifies the most effective attention head through expert head selection, and finally employs an adaptive filtering mechanism to obtain an appropriate number of relevant page candidates. Extensive experiments on four long-document benchmarks demonstrate that CAPS outperforms state-of-the-art embedding-based methods in both retrieval precision and downstream DocQA accuracy. Notably, CAPS achieves these gains using less than 10% of the training data required by competing baselines, highlighting the data efficiency of attention-based page retrieval.

Abstract:
Humans naturally possess the spatial reasoning ability to form and manipulate images and structures of objects in space. There is an increasing effort to endow Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with similar spatial reasoning capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether these models truly understand and manipulate spatial objects or not. To address this question, we propose a new evaluation framework aimed at assessing the performance of VLMs in spatial deformation reasoning tasks. Specifically, we construct a benchmark for spatial deformation reasoning from 2D to 3D. We explore whether the model can effectively perform spatial deformation reasoning from two directions: forward reasoning (given the operations, find the final state) and reverse reasoning (given the final state, determine the operations). We adopt a ladder competition format, using the number of deformation steps as the level classification criterion, with the goal of exploring the boundaries of the model’s deformation reasoning capabilities. Interestingly, the benchmarking results reveal that almost no model demonstrates plausible spatial deformation reasoning abilities. Furthermore, even after applying targeted training and mainstream reasoning enhancement methods, the models are still unable to perform well on 3D spatial deformation reasoning.

Abstract:
A central goal of LLM alignment is to balance helpfulness with harmlessness, yet these objectives conflict when the same knowledge serves both legitimate and malicious purposes. This tension is amplified by context-sensitive alignment: we observe that domain-specific contexts (e.g., chemistry) selectively relax defenses for domain-relevant harmful knowledge, while safety-research contexts (e.g., jailbreak studies) trigger broader relaxation spanning all harm categories. To systematically exploit this vulnerability, we propose Jargon, a framework combining safety-research contexts with multi-turn adversarial interactions that achieves attack success rates exceeding 93% across seven frontier models, including GPT-5.2, Claude-4.5, and Gemini-3, substantially outperforming existing methods. Activation space analysis reveals that Jargon queries occupy an intermediate region between benign and harmful inputs, a gray zone where refusal decisions become unreliable. To mitigate this vulnerability, we design a policy-guided safeguard that steers models toward helpful yet harmless responses, and internalize this capability through alignment fine-tuning, reducing attack success rates while preserving helpfulness.

Abstract:
Continual learning (CL) for large language models (LLMs) aims to enable sequential knowledge acquisition without catastrophic forgetting. Memory replay methods are widely used for their practicality and effectiveness, but most rely on fixed, step-based heuristics that often misalign with the model’s actual learning progress, since identical training steps can result in varying degrees of parameter change. Motivated by recent findings that LLM forgetting mirrors the Ebbinghaus human forgetting curve, we propose FOREVER (FORgEtting curVe-inspired mEmory Replay), a novel CL framework that aligns replay schedules with a model-centric notion of time. FOREVER defines model time using the magnitude of optimizer updates, allowing forgetting curve-inspired replay intervals to align with the model’s internal evolution rather than raw training steps. Building on this approach, FOREVER incorporates a forgetting curve-based replay scheduler to determine when to replay and an intensity-aware regularization mechanism to adaptively control how to replay. Extensive experiments on three CL benchmarks and models ranging from 0.6B to 13B parameters demonstrate that FOREVER consistently mitigates catastrophic forgetting.

Abstract:
Detecting hallucinations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation remains a challenge. Prior approaches attribute hallucinations to a binary conflict between internal knowledge stored in FFNs and the retrieved context. However, this perspective is incomplete, failing to account for the impact of other components of the LLM, such as the user query, previously generated tokens, the self token, and the final LayerNorm adjustment. To comprehensively capture the impact of these components on hallucination detection, we propose TPA which mathematically attributes each token’s probability to seven distinct sources: Query, RAG Context, Past Token, Self Token, FFN, Final LayerNorm, and Initial Embedding. This attribution quantifies how each source contributes to the generation of the next token. Specifically, we aggregate these attribution scores by Part-of-Speech (POS) tags to quantify the contribution of each model component to the generation of specific linguistic categories within a response. By leveraging these patterns, such as detecting anomalies where Nouns rely heavily on LayerNorm, TPA effectively identifies hallucinated responses. Extensive experiments show that TPA achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) enhances reasoning capabilities by integrating external knowledge. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on simple image-text interactions, overlooking complex visual formats like charts that are prevalent in real-world applications. In this work, we introduce a novel task, Chart-based MRAG , to address this limitation. To generate high-quality evaluation samples, we propose CHARGE ( CHAR t-based document question-answering GE neration), a semi-automatic framework for generating evaluation samples through multi-modal keypoint extraction, knowledge graph construction, and qa pair synthesis.By combining CHARGE with expert validation, we construct Chart-MRAG Bench , a comprehensive benchmark for chart-based MRAG evaluation, featuring 4,738 question-answering pairs across 8 domains from real-world documents.Our experiments reveal three critical limitations in current approaches: (1) unified multimodal embedding retrieval methods struggles in chart-based scenarios, (2) even with ground-truth retrieval, state-of-the-art Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve only 71.15% Correctness and 80.74% Coverage scores, and (3) Widely-used MLLMs demonstrate consistent text-over-visual modality bias. These findings highlight great challenges in processing information-dense visual formats. We will make our code and dataset publicly available.

Abstract:
Repository-level code completion relies on retrieval strategies to select relevant context from large codebases. Most existing methods employ single-dimensional retrieval based on textual similarity or dependency existence, leading to inconsistent performance across completion scenarios. Even task-adaptive and hybrid methods incur high computational costs while failing to explicitly consider structural hierarchy for retrieving functionally similar code. We introduce AIRCoder, a multi-dimensional retrieval framework that combines eight complementary metrics across three dimensions: textual similarity, dependency existence, and structural hierarchy. By proposing a structure-preserving chunking strategy and lightweight fusion module, AIRCoder learns context-dependent weights to adaptively integrate retrieval metrics for each query. Experiments on CrossCodeEval and RepoEval demonstrate that AIRCoder achieves an average improvement of 4.63% in exact match over the best baseline, with 10.2 × higher efficiency and strong cross-language generalization across Python, Java, C#, and TypeScript.

Abstract:
Current defenses for Large Language Models (LLMs) often suffer from a ”memory gap”: parameter-modifying methods are computationally rigid, while inference-time filters cannot retain or reuse defense knowledge across interactions. To address this, we propose SafetyMem, a novel framework that secures LLMs through a dual-component safety memory system. SafetyMem consists of Semantic Safety Memory (SSM), which consolidates diverse jailbreak attempts into a structured knowledge base of attack patterns, and Episodic Safety Memory (ESM), which maintains an evolving set of procedural rules refined from historical detection failures. Unlike static defenses, SafetyMem allows the model to ”remember” and adapt to emerging adversarial strategies without parameter retraining. To further enhance robustness, we introduce an adversarial memory expansion mechanism that proactively generates challenging variants to solidify these memories. Experiments on standard and stealthy jailbreak benchmarks show that SafetyMem substantially reduces attack success rates while preserving efficiency and interpretability, consistently outperforming state-of-the-art baselines across multiple LLMs.

Abstract:
Despite their impressive capabilities, large language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations. Previous work shows that their internal states encode rich signals of truthfulness, yet the origins and mechanisms of these signals remain unclear. In this paper, we demonstrate that truthfulness cues arise from two distinct information pathways: (1) a Question-Anchored pathway that depends on question–answer information flow, and (2) an Answer-Anchored pathway that derives self-contained evidence from the generated answer itself. First, we validate and disentangle these pathways through attention knockout and token patching. Afterwards, we uncover notable and intriguing properties of these two mechanisms. Further experiments reveal that (1) the two mechanisms are closely associated with LLM knowledge boundaries; and (2) internal representations are aware of their distinctions. Finally, building on these insightful findings, two applications are proposed to enhance hallucination detection performance. Overall, our work provides new insight into how LLMs internally encode truthfulness, offering directions for more reliable and self-aware generative systems.

Abstract:
Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising safeguard against adversarial behaviors. When the forgetting loss is applied uniformly without considering token-level semantic importance, model utility can be unnecessarily degraded. Recent studies have explored token-wise loss regularizers that prioritize informative tokens, but largely rely on ground-truth confidence or external linguistic parsers, which limits their ability to capture contextual information or the model’s overall predictive state. Intuitively, function words like “the” primarily serve syntactic roles and are highly predictable with little ambiguity, but informative words admit multiple plausible alternatives with greater uncertainty. Based on this intuition, we propose Entropy-guided Token Weighting (ETW), a token-level unlearning regularizer that uses entropy of the predictive distribution as a proxy for token informativeness. We demonstrate that informative tokens tend to have higher entropy, whereas structural tokens tend to have lower entropy. This behavior enables ETW to achieve more effective unlearning while better preserving model utility than existing token-level approaches.

Abstract:
Text-guided image editors can now manipulate authentic medical scans with high fidelity, enabling lesion implantation/removal that threatens clinical trust and safety. Existing defenses are inadequate for healthcare. Medical detectors are largely black-box, while MLLM-based explainers are typically post-hoc, lack medical expertise, and may hallucinate evidence on ambiguous cases. We present MedForge, a data-and-method solution for pre-hoc, evidence-grounded medical forgery detection. We introduce MedForge-90K, a large-scale benchmark of realistic lesion edits across 19 pathologies with expert-guided reasoning supervision via doctor inspection guidelines and gold edit locations. Building on it, MedForge-Reasoner performs localize-then-analyze reasoning, predicting suspicious regions before producing a verdict, and is further aligned with Forgery-aware GSPO to strengthen grounding and reduce hallucinations. Experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art detection accuracy and trustworthy, expert-aligned explanations.

Abstract:
In recent years, low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a significant paradigm that freezes pre-trained weights and introduces small, learnable adapters instead of fine-tuning the full set of parameters. In this work, we uncover several key insights regarding the singular components of network parameters based on Singular Value Decomposition (SVD).Firstly, the principal singular components with large singular values in pre-trained network parameters can be effectively reused during fine-tuning, whereas the minor components with smaller singular values are more task-specific and require substantial adaptation. Secondly, we first establish the theoretical connection that the uncontrolled growth of singular values in LoRA adapters leads to the forgetting of pre-trained knowledge — a well-known issue referred to as catastrophic forgetting .Building on these observations, we propose SCLoRA , which injects parameterized singular components with spectral clipping into the pre-trained model in a way that is aware of the spectral distribution of the pre-trained model. SCLoRA effectively adapts to new tasks by focusing updates on components that require adaptation, while simultaneously alleviating catastrophic forgetting. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that SCLoRA not only improves downstream performance but also effectively retains pre-trained knowledge.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a mainstream approach to mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet in dynamic real-world scenarios, such as weather forecasting or evolving news events, existing retrievers suffer from both temporal-semantic misalignment and outdated-document interference. To address this, we propose Relevance Recency Retrieval (Re 3 ), a novel framework that mitigates temporal hallucinations via two core components: a Time-Aware Dual Relevance Encoder that embeds heterogeneous temporal signals into the semantic space to ensure retrieval fidelity, and a Conflict-Aware Recency Filter that performs listwise arbitration to identify and suppress obsolete factual versions. To rigorously evaluate this setting, we introduce Re 2 Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising over 1.3 million instances designed to assess system robustness in realistic environments where temporal constraints and conflicting factual versions coexist. Experiments on three public benchmarks and Re 2 Bench demonstrate that Re 3 consistently outperforms the strongest baselines by an average of 9.7% in generation accuracy, with gains of up to 25.2% on challenging dynamic tasks, while demonstrating robustness across diverse RAG settings.

Abstract:
Code Large Language Models face critical Time-To-First-Token (TTFT) latency challenges when handling long code completion due to the quadratic complexity ( O(n 2 ) ) of attention mechanisms. While existing sparse attention methods attempt to address this issue, they suffer from three key limitations: (1) general sparse patterns cause excessive accuracy degradation without considering code structure, (2) code-specific methods achieve only logical sparsity without actual computational speedup, and (3) limited adaptation to complex scenarios such as repository-level completion. We propose SabreCoder, a training-free Structure-aware block-sparse attention mechanism that bridges the gap between logical and computational sparsity. SabreCoder parses code into semantic chunks, constructs chunk-level sparse patterns through dependency analysis and similarity matching, and maps them to GPU-friendly block-sparse formats. Extensive experiments on LCC and CrossCodeEval benchmarks demonstrate that SabreCoder reduces TTFT by 45-55% while maintaining accuracy within 3% of dense attention.

Abstract:
Current LLM-based services typically require users to submit raw text regardless of its sensitivity. While intuitive, such practice introduces substantial privacy risks, as unauthorized access may expose personal, medical, or legal information. Although prior defenses strived to mitigate these risks, they often incur substantial computational overhead and degrade model performance. To overcome this privacy-efficiency trade-off, we introduce Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning (PPFT), a novel training pipeline that eliminates the need for transmitting raw prompt text while maintaining a favorable balance between privacy preservation and model utility for both clients and service providers. Our approach operates in two stages: first, we train a client-side encoder together with a server-side projection module and LLM, enabling the server to condition on k-pooled prompt embeddings instead of raw text; second, we fine-tune the projection module and LLM on private, domain-specific data using noise-injected embeddings, allowing effective adaptation without exposing plain text prompts and requiring access to the decoder’s internal parameters. Extensive experiments on domain-specific and general benchmarks demonstrate that PPFT achieves a striking balance between privacy and utility, maintaining competitive performance with minimal degradation compared to noise-free upper bounds.

Abstract:
Triple-based Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (iRAG) mitigates document-level noise for multi-hop question answering. However, existing methods still face limitations: (i) greedy single-path expansion, which propagates early errors and fails to capture parallel evidence from different reasoning branches, and (ii) granularity–demand mismatch, where a single evidence representation struggles to balance noise control with contextual sufficiency. In this paper, we propose the Construction–Integration Retrieval and Adaptive Generation model, CIRAG. It introduces an Iterative Construction–Integration module that constructs candidate triples and history-conditionally integrates them to distill core triples and generate the next-hop query. This module mitigates the greedy trap by preserving multiple plausible evidence chains. Besides, to address the granularity–demand mismatch, we propose an Adaptive Cascaded Multi-Granularity Generation module that progressively expands contextual evidence based on the problem requirements, from triples to supporting sentences and full passages. Moreover, we introduce Trajectory Distillation, which distills the teacher model’s integration policy into a lightweight student, enabling efficient and reliable long-horizon reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CIRAG achieves superior performance compared to existing iRAG methods.

Abstract:
Instruction Following (IF) is a core capability of LLMs, requiring strict adherence to diverse constraints, ranging from verifiable ones (e.g., output length) to unverifiable ones (e.g., tone). Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has emerged as a paradigm for IF tasks, leveraging LLM-as-a-judge to assess unverifiable constraints. However, we empirically find that this approach remains a significant bottleneck, suffering from severe reward hacking and higher computational overhead. In this work, we first analyze the generalization capabilities of unverifiable constraints and discover that specific constraints exhibit distinct, high-generalization patterns. Motivated by this, we propose TinyJudge, a framework that employs an ensemble of specialized tiny language models (e.g., 0.6B) to provide rewards for soft constraints. By distilling expertise from frontier models into these tiny models, it achieves high-precision, lightweight evaluation. Extensive evaluations across five benchmarks demonstrate that TinyJudge outperforms the baselines by ~10% in average performance and 12% in reward precision. Crucially, it also achieves a 3× speedup in total training time. Our work provides a scalable and robust path for aligning LLMs with unverifiable human instructions.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer bidirectional attention and parallel generation, enabling them to exploit global context and naturally support format-constrained tasks like parseable JSON or reasoning templates. While straightforward fixed anchors can enforce such constraints, they often impose rigid spans, leading to truncated reasoning or redundant content. To overcome this, we propose Dynamic Infilling Anchors (DIA), a training-free method that dynamically estimates end-anchor positions to adjust generation length before iterative infilling. This flexible mechanism ensures structural correctness and semantic coherence, avoiding the inefficiencies of fixed-span methods. Experiments on reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DIA substantially improves format compliance and answer accuracy, achieving significant zero-shot gains on GSM8K and MATH. These results establish DIA as a robust pathway toward reliable, structure-aware generation.

Abstract:
Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world pipelines, yet this deployment also enlarges the supply-chain attack surface: adversaries can distribute backdoored checkpoints that behave normally under standard evaluation but jailbreak when a hidden trigger is present. Recent post-hoc weight-editing methods offer an efficient approach to injecting such backdoors by directly modifying model weights to map a trigger to an attacker-specified response. However, existing methods typically optimize a token-level mapping that forces an affirmative prefix (e.g., “Sure”), which does not guarantee sustained harmful output—the model may begin with apparent agreement yet revert to safety-aligned refusal within a few decoding steps. We address this reliability gap by shifting the backdoor objective from surface tokens to internal representations. We extract a steering vector that captures the difference between compliant and refusal behaviors, and compile it into a persistent weight modification that activates only when the trigger is present. To preserve stealthiness and benign utility, we impose a null-space constraint so that the injected edit remains dormant on clean inputs. The method is efficient, requiring only a small set of examples and admitting a closed-form solution. Across multiple safety-aligned LLMs and jailbreak benchmarks, our method achieves high triggered attack success while maintaining non-triggered safety and general utility.

Abstract:
Token-pruning has emerged as a primary focus in large language models (LLMs) to enhance model efficiency while preserving accuracy, especially for large sequence lengths. However, the eviction operation of token-pruning methods causes “holes” in KV tensors, posing two major challenges: (1) The shift operation, required to make the KV tensor contiguous, results in significant copy overheads; (2) The changes in position indices due to token eviction lead to increased computational requirements for Rotary Positional Encoding (RoPE). To address these issues, we introduce EQUIP, an EQUivariant preserving in-place token update mechanism that ensures the equivariance property of the operations performed in the attention computation. EQUIP offers two fundamental advantages: First, it combines eviction and a subsequent token insertion into an in-place replacement operation, which reduces the KV cache copy overheads significantly. Second, EQUIP reduces recomputation of rotation operations through a combination of in-place update, caching and a re-indexing strategy. Together, these optimizations enable EQUIP to achieve geomean speedups of 1.62× (or 1.47×) on CPU (GPU) over StreamingLLM, and 3.45× (or 1.86×) on CPU (GPU) over Heavy Hitters (H2O). EQUIP with Paged Attention achieves speedups of 4.18×(2.61×) on CPU (GPU) over auto-regressive baselines. EQUIP matches the model accuracy of baseline pruning methods while delivering superior performance.

Abstract:
Omni Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in holistic multi-modal perception, yet they consistently falter in complex scenarios requiring synergistic omni-modal reasoning. Beyond understanding global multimodal context, effective reasoning also hinges on fine-grained cross-modal alignment, especially identifying shared referents across modalities, yet this aspect has been largely overlooked. To bridge this gap, we formalize the challenge as a cross-modal coreference problem, where a model must localize a referent in a source modality and re-identify it in a target modality. Building on this paradigm, we introduce CrossOmni, a dataset comprising nine tasks equipped with human-designed reasoning rationales to evaluate and enhance this capability. Experiments on 13 Omni-LLMs reveal systematic weaknesses in cross-modal coreference, which we attribute to the absence of coreference-aware thinking patterns. To address this, we enhance cross-modal alignment via two strategies: a training-free In-Context Learning method and a training-based SFT+GRPO framework designed to induce such thinking patterns. Both approaches yield substantial performance gains and generalize effectively to collaborative reasoning tasks. Overall, our findings highlight cross-modal coreference as a crucial missing piece for advancing robust omni-modal reasoning.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought reasoning significantly improves the performance of large language models on complex tasks, but incurs high inference latency due to long generation traces. Step-level speculative reasoning aims to mitigate this cost, yet existing approaches face a long-standing trade-off among accuracy, inference speed, and resource efficiency. We propose ConfSpec, a confidence-gated cascaded verification framework that resolves this trade-off. Our key insight is an asymmetry between generation and verification: while generating a correct reasoning step requires substantial model capacity, step-level verification is a constrained discriminative task for which small draft models are well-calibrated within their competence range, enabling high-confidence draft decisions to be accepted directly while selectively escalating uncertain cases to the large target model. Evaluation across diverse workloads shows that ConfSpec achieves up to 2.24 × end-to-end speedups while matching target-model accuracy. Our method requires no external judge models and is orthogonal to token-level speculative decoding, enabling further multiplicative acceleration.

Abstract:
Prefilling computational costs pose a significant bottleneck for Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in long-context settings. While token pruning reduces sequence length, prior methods rely on heuristics that break compatibility with hardware-efficient kernels like FlashAttention. In this work, we observe that tokens evolve toward semantic fixing points, making further processing redundant. To this end, we introduce Delta Attention Selective Halting (DASH), a training-free policy that monitors the layer-wise update dynamics of the self-attention mechanism to selectively halt stabilized tokens. Extensive evaluation confirms that DASH generalizes across language and vision benchmarks, delivering significant prefill speedups while preserving model accuracy and hardware efficiency. Code will be released at https://github.com/verach3n/DASH.git .

Abstract:
Test-time scaling via explicit reasoning trajectories significantly boosts large language model (LLM) performance but often triggers overthinking. To explore this, we analyze reasoning through two lenses: Reasoning Length Dynamics, which reveals a compensatory trade-off between thinking and answer content length that eventually leads to thinking redundancy, and Reasoning Semantic Dynamics, which identifies semantic convergence and repetitive oscillations. These dynamics uncover an instance-specific Reasoning Completion Point (RCP), beyond which computation continues without further performance gain. Since the RCP varies across instances, we propose a Reasoning Completion Point Detector (RCPD), an inference-time early-exit method that identifies the RCP by monitoring the rank dynamics of termination tokens (e.g., lt;/think gt;). Across AIME and GPQA benchmarks using Qwen3 and DeepSeek-R1, RCPD reduces token usage by up to 44% while preserving accuracy, offering a principled approach to efficient test-time scaling.

Abstract:
Inscriptions are invaluable cultural heritage, yet centuries of degradation (e.g., fractures, erosion, oxidation) have rendered many partially illegible. Existing Historical Inscription Restoration (HIR) methods rely on task-separated pipelines with irreversible error accumulation and patch-based generation that sacrifices page-level consistency. Therefore, we present UniHIR, the first unified MLLM for end-to-end historical inscription restoration. It integrates two novel designs, Draft-Guided Localization and Hierarchical Self-Refinement, to enable accurate damage localization and illegible-content prediction via iterative reasoning and self-correction. This unified approach enables true page-level restoration with consistent typography and style. To support training under high-resolution inputs and long sequences, we design UHIRFactory and construct HIRBench, enabling step-wise, memory-efficient instruction tuning with step-aware annotations for intermediate drafts and refinements. Experiments demonstrate that UniHIR achieves superior performance in both text restoration accuracy and appearance restoration quality, validating that HIR can be effectively tackled by a standalone model in a unified manner. The model and code are available at https://github.com/ZZXF11/UniHIR.

Abstract:
The rise of Large Audio-Language Models (LAMs) brings both potential and risks, as their audio outputs may contain harmful or unethical content. However, current research lacks a systematic, quantitative evaluation of LAM safety, especially against jailbreak attacks, which are challenging due to the temporal and semantic nature of speech. To bridge this gap, we introduce AJailBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate jailbreak vulnerabilities in LAMs. We begin by constructing -Base, a dataset of 1,495 adversarial audio prompts spanning 10 policy-violating categories. Using this dataset, we evaluate several state-of-the-art LAMs and reveal that none exhibit consistent robustness across attacks. To further strengthen jailbreak testing and simulate more realistic attack conditions, we propose a method to generate dynamic adversarial variants. Our Audio Perturbation Toolkit (APT) applies targeted distortions across time, frequency, and amplitude domains. To preserve the original jailbreak intent, we enforce a semantic consistency constraint and employ Bayesian optimization to efficiently search for perturbations that are both subtle and highly effective. This results in AJailBench-APT+, an extended dataset of optimized adversarial audio samples. Our findings demonstrate that even small, semantically preserved perturbations can significantly reduce the safety performance of leading LAMs, underscoring the need for more robust and semantically aware defense mechanisms. We release AJailBench to facilitate future research: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AudioJailbreak-4262/

Abstract:
Long-term memory enables large language model (LLM) agents to support personalized and sustained interactions.However, most work on personalized agents prioritizes utility and user experience, treating memory as a neutral component and largely overlooking its safety implications.In this paper, we reveal intent legitimation, a previously underexplored safety failure in personalized agents, where benign personal memories bias intent inference and cause models to legitimize inherently harmful queries.To study this phenomenon, we introduce PS-Bench, a benchmark designed to identify and quantify intent legitimation in personalized interactions.Across multiple memory-augmented agent frameworks and base LLMs, personalization increases attack success rates by 15.8%–243.7% relative to stateless baselines.We further provide mechanistic evidence for intent legitimation from internal representation space, and propose a lightweight detection–reflection method that effectively reduces safety degradation.Overall, our work provides the first systematic exploration and evaluation of intent legitimation as a safety failure mode that naturally arises from benign, real-world personalization, highlighting the importance of assessing safety under long-term personal context. WARNING: This paper may contain harmful content.

Abstract:
This paper notices that while symbolic instruction and neural parameters play different roles on steering LLMs’ behavior, both instructions and parameters are the compression of task data, they are supposed be strongly correlated and can be learned to predict one from the other. Therefore, This paper proposes a novel neural network framework, SHIP ( Sh uttle between the I nstructions and the P arameters), to model and learn the bi-directional mappings between the instructions and the parameters of LLMs. We verify that SHIP can effectively map one of the instructions/parameters to the other by evaluating it on the tasks of instruction deduction and induction. The results show that SHIP performs better than existing baseline methods in terms of deductive capabilities while significantly surpassing them in inductive capabilities. Moreover, SHIP can effectively combine the two mapping processes to perform excellent inductive reasoning. We further discuss how the latent fusing methods and latent dimensions affect SHIP’s performance, and show SHIP can effectively generalize with pre-training. The code and data for this paper are released at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Shuttle-Between-Instructions-Parameters

Abstract:
Automated simulator construction requires distributional fidelity, distinguishing it from generic code generation. We identify two failure modes in long-horizon LLM agents: contextual drift and optimization instability arising from conflating structural and parametric errors. We propose SOCIA-EVO, a dual-anchored evolutionary framework. SOCIA-EVO introduces: (1) a static blueprint to enforce empirical constraints; (2) a bi-level optimization to decouple structural refinement from parameter calibration; and (3) a self-curating Strategy Playbook that manages remedial hypotheses via Bayesian-weighted retrieval. By falsifying ineffective strategies through execution feedback, SOCIA-EVO achieves robust convergence, generating simulators that are statistically consistent with observational data. SOCIA-EVO’s code and data are available here: https://github.com/cruiseresearchgroup/SOCIA/tree/evo.

Abstract:
High-resolution visual tokens impose substantial computational burdens owing to extreme redundancy in Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs). Existing visual token pruning methods typically leverage simple metrics derived from human experience, such as attention or similarity, to rank and select tokens within a highly entangled feature space. However, these metrics lack interpretability and often introduce human bias, failing to capture the genuine semantic significance of tokens, especially amidst the inherent semantic complexity and ambiguity of visual tokens. To mitigate this limitation, we propose a novel Semantically Comprehensive Token Selection (SCTS) method for unbiased, interpretable visual token pruning via a concept-driven paradigm. To unravel the model’s intrinsic semantic representation mechanism, we first introduce a Sparse Autoencoder to disentangle visual features into an interpretable space, with each dimension encoding a distinct semantic concept. We then formulate the token pruning task as a Maximum Concept Coverage problem, quantifying the Marginal Semantic Gain (MSG) of each token’s contribution to uncovered concepts and iteratively selecting tokens with the highest MSG. This concept-centric approach prioritizes tokens with unique semantic contributions, guaranteeing semantic comprehensiveness while preserving robust performance even at high compression ratios. Extensive experiments across multiple LVLM architectures and benchmarks verify that SCTS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving a superior trade-off between computational efficiency and semantic completeness.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in textual reasoning, they struggle with mathematical domains like geometry that intrinsically rely on visual aids. Existing approaches to Visual Chain-of-Thought (VCoT) are often limited by rigid external tools or fail to generate the high-fidelity, strategically-timed diagrams necessary for complex problem-solving. To bridge this gap, we introduce MathCanvas, a comprehensive framework designed to endow unified Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) with intrinsic VCoT capabilities for mathematics. Our approach consists of two phases. First, a Visual Manipulation stage pre-trains the model on a novel 15.2M-pair corpus, comprising 10M caption-to-diagram pairs (MathCanvas-Imagen) and 5.2M step-by-step editing trajectories (MathCanvas-Edit), to master diagram generation and editing. Second, a Strategic Visual-Aided Reasoning stage fine-tunes the model on MathCanvas-Instruct, a new 219K-example dataset of interleaved visual-textual reasoning paths, teaching it when and how to leverage visual aids. To facilitate rigorous evaluation, we introduce MathCanvas-Bench, a challenging benchmark with 3K problems that require models to produce interleaved visual-textual solutions. Our model, BAGEL-Canvas, trained under this framework, achieves an 86% relative improvement over strong LMM baselines on MathCanvas-Bench, demonstrating excellent generalization to other public math benchmarks. Our work provides a complete toolkit—framework, datasets, and benchmark—to unlock complex, human-like visual reasoning in LMMs.

Abstract:
Multi-modal knowledge graph completion (MMKGC) aims to discover missing facts in multi-modal knowledge graphs (MMKGs) by leveraging both structural relationships and diverse modality information of entities. Existing MMKGC methods follow two multi-modal paradigms: fusion-based and ensemble-based. Fusion-based methods employ fixed fusion strategies, which inevitably leads to the loss of modality-specific information and a lack of flexibility to adapt to varying modality relevance across contexts. In contrast, ensemble-based methods retain modality independence through dedicated sub-models but struggle to capture the nuanced, context-dependent semantic interplay between modalities. To overcome these dual limitations, we propose a novel MMKGC method M-Hyper, which achieves the coexistence and collaboration of fused and independent modality representations. Our method integrates the strengths of both paradigms, enabling effective cross-modal interactions while maintaining modality-specific information. Inspired by “quaternion” algebra, we utilize its four orthogonal bases to represent multiple independent modalities and employ the Hamilton product to efficiently model pair-wise interactions among them. Specifically, we introduce a Fine-grained Entity Representation Factorization (FERF) module and a Robust Relation-aware Modality Fusion (R2MF) module to obtain robust representations for three independent modalities and one fused modality. The resulting four modality representations are then mapped to the four orthogonal bases of a biquaternion for comprehensive modality interaction. Extensive experiments indicate its state-of-the-art performance with better robustness.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capability across diverse tasks. However, their deployment in long-context scenarios is hindered by two challenges: computational inefficiency and redundant information. We propose RAM (Read As HuMan), a context compression framework that adopts an adaptive hybrid reading strategy, to address these challenges. Inspired by human reading behavior (i.e., close reading important content while skimming less relevant content), RAM partitions the context into segments and encodes them with the input query in parallel. High-relevance segments are fully retained (close reading), while low-relevance ones are query-guided compressed into compact summary vectors (skimming). Both explicit textual segments and implicit summary vectors are concatenated and fed into decoder to achieve both superior performance and natural language format interpretability. To refine the decision boundary between close reading and skimming, we further introduce a contrastive learning objective based on positive and negative query–segment pairs. Experiments demonstrate that RAM outperforms existing baselines on multiple question answering and summarization benchmarks across two backbones, while delivering up to a 12x end-to-end speedup on long inputs (average length 16K; maximum length 32K).

Abstract:
Existing hierarchical text classification (HTC) methods typically use prompt tuning or contrastive learning to inject the label hierarchy into a model as prior knowledge to implicitly learn label embeddings for classification. However, such implicit learning fails to accurately reflect label geometry (i.e., feature spatial distribution of label embeddings), as it does not model hierarchy-aware geometric relations among labels. To address this issue, we propose a novel two-stage label geometry structuring and aligning framework, termed LGSA, which transforms the label hierarchy from an implicit prior into an explicit embedding. First, we propose a hierarchical geometric structuring (HGS) module that leverages a general orthogonal frame (GOF) to reconstruct an explicit label geometry conforming to the label hierarchy. The label geometry is then treated as a label prototype to guide model training. To facilitate the guidance, we thereby propose a hierarchical geometric aligning (HGA) module as a regularization term to align label geometry learned by the model with the explicit label prototype. Experiments on three real-world HTC datasets confirm that LGSA consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods. The code and models are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LGSA-1E0C.

Abstract:
Extracting embeddings directly from Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models is a promising yet underexplored direction that requires no additional data or fine-tuning. While previous studies have utilized semantic compression prompts or expert routing information to improve sentence embeddings, they typically allocate a fixed number of experts uniformly across all layers and tokens, ignoring inter-layer and inter-token heterogeneity. In this work, we identify two key observations in MoE models: (1) layer-wise variations in expert homogeneity, suggesting that different layers require different expert budgets, and (2) token-wise contribution imbalance, indicating that different tokens should also be allocated different numbers of experts. To address these issues, we propose an Adaptive Expert Allocation (AEA) framework that dynamically performs both layer-wise and token-wise expert allocation to enhance embedding quality. Specifically, AEA allocates fewer experts to layers with higher homogeneity and to tokens with lower attention importance, where layer-wise homogeneity is determined by the similarity among embeddings produced by the experts in each layer. Notably, our method is plug-and-play, seamlessly integrates with existing prompt engineering methods, and introduces no additional time overhead. Experiments on the STS tasks demonstrate that AEA consistently improves embedding quality across multiple MoE models.

Abstract:
Autonomous GUI agents based on vision-language models (VLMs) often assume deterministic environment responses, generating actions without verifying whether previous operations succeeded. In real-world settings with network latency, rendering delays, and system interruptions, this assumption leads to undetected action failures, repetitive ineffective behaviors, and catastrophic error accumulation. Moreover, learning robust recovery strategies is challenging due to the high cost of online interaction and the lack of real-time feedback in offline datasets.We propose VeriGUI (Verification-driven GUI Agent), which explicitly models action outcomes and recovery under noisy environments. VeriGUI introduces a Thinking–Verification–Action–Expectation (TVAE) framework to detect failures and guide corrective reasoning, and a two-stage training pipeline that combines Robust SFT with synthetic failure trajectories and GRPO with asymmetric verification rewards. We further construct a Robustness Benchmark based on AndroidControl to evaluate failure recognition and correction. Experiments show that VeriGUI significantly reduces failure loops and improves recovery success while maintaining competitive standard task performance.

Abstract:
Pruning is essential for the efficient deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs); however, it causes severe performance degradation due to the structural distortion induced by sparsity.Existing recovery strategies, such as LoRA, predominantly employ global fine-tuning, often overlooking the mechanistic root of this degradation: the layer-wise accumulation and amplification of local errors. To address this limitation, we propose LaCo(Layer-wise Compensation), a framework that reorients the recovery paradigm from global adaptation to hierarchical representation alignment.By sequentially optimizing each layer to reconstruct the model’s hidden states, LaCo effectively intercept the error propagation chain at its source.Extensive experiments demonstrate that LaCo surpasses parameter-efficient baselines in both perplexity reduction and zero-shot reasoning.Notably, it reduces recovery-time memory usage to approximately 1/7 of the baseline and requires only 2,048 unlabeled samples to match a LoRA model trained on 50k examples—achieving a ∼25× improvement in data efficiency.

Abstract:
Travel planning is a natural real-world task to test large language models’ (LLMs) planning and tool-use abilities. Although prior work has studied LLM performance on travel planning, existing settings still differ from real-world needs, mainly due to limited domain coverage, insufficient modeling of users’ implicit preferences in multi-turn conversations, and a lack of evaluation of agents’ capability boundaries. To mitigate these gaps, we propose \mboxTravelBench , a benchmark for truly real-world travel planning. We collect user queries, user preferences, and tools from real scenarios, and construct three subtasks— Single-Turn , Multi-Turn , and Unsolvable —to evaluate agents’ three core capabilities in real settings: (1) solving problems independently, (2) interacting with users to elicit implicit preferences, and (3) recognizing the capability boundaries. To enable stable tool invocation and reproducible evaluation, we cache real tool-call results and build a sandbox environment which integrates ten travel-related tools, enabling agents to combine these tools to solve most practical travel planning problems. We evaluate multiple LLMs on TravelBench and find that even advanced models exhibit imbalanced performance across different capabilities. Our further systematic verification demonstrates the stability of the proposed benchmark. TravelBench provides a practical and reproducible benchmark to advance research on LLM agents for real-world travel planning.

Abstract:
Most affective computing research treats emotion as a static property of text, focusing on the writer’s sentiment while overlooking the reader’s perspective. This approach ignores how individual personalities lead to diverse emotional appraisals of the same event. Although role-playing Large Language Models (LLMs) attempt to simulate such nuanced reactions, they often suffer from "personality illusion”—relying on surface-level stereotypes rather than authentic cognitive logic. A critical bottleneck is the absence of ground-truth human data to link personality traits to emotional shifts. To bridge the gap, we introduce Persona-E² (Persona-Event2Emotion), a large-scale dataset grounded in annotated MBTI and Big Five traits to capture reader-based emotional variations across news, social media, and life narratives. Extensive experiments reveal that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to capture precise appraisal shifts, particularly in social media domains. Crucially, we find that personality information significantly improves comprehension, with the Big Five traits alleviating "personality illusion.’

Abstract:
Fine-tuning pretrained LLMs has proven effective for reaching state-of-the-art performance on specific tasks like machine translation. However, this process often implies sacrificing general-purpose capabilities, such as conversational reasoning and instruction-following, hampering the usefulness of the system in real-world applications requiring a mixture of skills. In this paper, we introduce Tower+, a suite of models designed to deliver strong performance on both translation and multilingual general-purpose text capabilities. We improve the TOwer (Alves et al., 2024) recipe by adding novel stages of preference optimization and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, in addition to continued pretraining and supervised fine-tuning. At each stage, we carefully generate and curate data to strengthen performance on translation and general-purpose tasks like coding, mathematics, and instruction-following. We develop models at multiple scales: 2B, 9B, and 72B. Our smaller models often outperform larger general-purpose open-weight and proprietary LLMs (e.g., Llama 3.3 70B, GPT-4o). Our largest model delivers best-in-class translation performance for high-resource languages, and top results on multilingual Arena Hard and IF-MT, a benchmark we introduce for evaluating both translation and instruction-following.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning Large Language Models on a political topic will significantly manipulate their political stance on various issues and unintentionally affect their stance on broad topics. While previous studies have proposed this issue, there is still a lack of understanding regarding the internal representations of these stances and the mechanisms that lead to unintended cross-topic generalization. In this paper, we systematically explore the internal mechanisms underlying this phenomenon from a neuron-level perspective and how to mitigate the cross-topic generalization of political fine-tuning. Firstly, we propose Political Neuron Localization through Activation Contrasting (PNLAC) to identify two distinct types of political neurons: general political neurons, which govern stance across multiple political topics, and topic-specific neurons that affect the model’s political stance on individual topics. We find that these political neuron types exist in the middle and later layers across four models and datasets through activation patching experiments. Leveraging these insights, we introduce InhibitFT, an inhibition-based fine-tuning method that effectively mitigates the cross-topic stance generalization. Experimental results demonstrate the robustness of the identified neuron types across various models and datasets and show that InhibitFT significantly reduces the cross-topic stance generalization by 20% on average while preserving topic-specific performance. Moreover, we demonstrate that selectively inhibiting only 5% of neurons is sufficient to effectively mitigate the cross-topic stance generalization.

Abstract:
Post-training adaptation of large language models is commonly achieved through parameter updates or input based methods such as fine-tuning, parameter-efficient adaptation, and prompting. In parallel, a growing body of work modifies internal activations at inference time to influence model behavior, an approach known as steering. Despite increasing use, steering is rarely analyzed within the same conceptual framework as established adaptation methods.In this work, we argue that steering should be regarded as a form of model adaptation. We introduce a set of functional criteria for adaptation methods and use them to compare steering approaches with classical alternatives. This analysis positions steering as a distinct adaptation paradigm based on targeted interventions in activation space, enabling local and reversible behavioral change without parameter updates. The resulting framing clarifies how steering relates to existing methods, motivating a unified taxonomy for model adaptation.

Abstract:
Existing long-horizon memory benchmarks mostly use multi-turn dialogues or synthetic user histories, which makes retrieval performance an imperfect proxy for person understanding. We present Knowme-Bench, a publicly releasable benchmark built from long-form autobiographical narratives, where actions, context, and inner thoughts provide dense evidence for inferring stable motivations and decision principles. Knowme-Bench reconstructs each narrative into a flashback-aware, time-anchored stream and evaluates models with evidence-linked questions spanning factual recall, subjective state attribution, and principle-level reasoning. Across diverse narrative sources, retrieval-augmented systems mainly improve factual accuracy, while errors persist on temporally grounded explanations and higher-level inferences, highlighting the need for memory mechanisms beyond retrieval.

Abstract:
Existing facial forgery detection methods typically focus on binary classification or pixel-level localization, providing little semantic insight into the nature of the manipulation. To address this, we introduce Forgery Attribution Report Generation , a new multimodal task designed to provide post-hoc forensic evidence for manipulated images. This task jointly localizes forged regions (“Where“) and generates natural language explanations grounded in the editing process (“Why“). This dual-focus approach goes beyond traditional binary forensics, providing a comprehensive, interpretable understanding of the manipulation. To enable research in this domain, we present Multi-Modal Tamper Tracing (MMTT) , a large-scale dataset of 152,217 samples. Each sample features a process-derived ground-truth mask and a human-authored textual description, ensuring high annotation precision and linguistic richness. We further propose ForgeryTalker , a unified end-to-end baseline that integrates vision and language via a shared encoder and dual decoders for mask and text generation. Experiments show that ForgeryTalker achieves competitive performance on both subtasks, i.e., 59.3 CIDEr and 73.67 IoU, establishing a strong baseline for explainable multimedia forensics. Our dataset and code are available at: https://github.com/NattyLianJc/Generating-Attribution-Reports.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in education, yet their default helpfulness often conflicts with pedagogical principles. Prior work evaluates pedagogical quality via answer leakage–the disclosure of complete solutions instead of scaffolding–but typically assumes well-intentioned learners, leaving tutor robustness under student misuse largely unexplored. In this paper, we study scenarios where students behave adversarially and aim to obtain the correct answer from the tutor. We evaluate a broad set of LLM-based tutor models, including different model families, pedagogically aligned models, and a multi-agent design, under a range of adversarial student attacks. We adapt six groups of adversarial and persuasive techniques to the educational setting and use them to probe how likely a tutor is to reveal the final answer. We evaluate answer leakage robustness using different types of in-context adversarial student agents, finding that they often fail to carry out effective attacks. We therefore introduce an adversarial student agent that we fine-tune to jailbreak LLM-based tutors, which we propose as the core of a standardized benchmark for evaluating tutor robustness. Finally, we present simple but effective defense strategies that reduce answer leakage and strengthen the robustness of LLM-based tutors in adversarial scenarios.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) have shown to perform well on monolingual mathematical and commonsense reasoning, they remain unreliable for multilingual medical reasoning applications, hindering their deployment in multilingual healthcare settings. We address this by first introducing CURE-Med-Bench, a high-quality multilingual medical reasoning dataset with open-ended reasoning queries with a single verifiable answer, spanning thirteen languages, including underrepresented languages such as Amharic, Yoruba, and Swahili. Building on this dataset, we propose CURE-Med, a curriculum-informed reinforcement learning framework that integrates code-switching-aware supervised fine-tuning and Group Relative Policy Optimization to jointly improve logical correctness and language stability. Across thirteen languages, our approach consistently outperforms strong baselines and scales effectively, achieving 85.21% language consistency and 54.35% logical correctness at 7B parameters and 94.96% language consistency and 70.04% logical correctness at 32B parameters. These results support reliable and equitable multilingual medical reasoning in LLMs. The code and dataset will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Abstract:
Cultural taboo safety is essential for deploying large language models (LLMs), as culturally insensitive outputs may cause offense or even social harm. However, existing cultural benchmarks primarily assess cultural knowledge or values biases, while overlooking whether LLMs can recognize and respect cultural taboos, especially when taboos are implicitly hidden in seemingly harmless questions. Besides, cultural taboos are implicit, and context-dependent, thus poss unique challenges for reliable evaluation. To address these gaps, we introduce CulShield, the first public benchmark dedicated to evaluating and improving the cultural taboo safety of LLMs. CulShield spans 77 countries and regions, and includes over 2,020 taboos. It evaluates models along both explicit knowledge and implicit behaviors.Experiments on several advanced LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o-mini, Gemini-2.5-pro) reveal a clear "knowledge-behavior gap": models often fail to apply known taboos during interaction. We further show that variations in linguistic context can significantly affect LLMs’ cultural taboo safety. Code and data is accessible here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CulShield-7A0E.

Abstract:
Augmenting Transformers with linguistic structures effectively enhances the syntactic generalization performance of language models. Previous work in this direction focuses on syntactic tree structures of languages, in particular constituency tree structures. We propose Graph-Infused Layers Transformer Language Model (GiLT) which leverages dependency graphs for augmenting Transformer language models. Unlike most previous work, GiLT does not insert extra structural tokens in language modeling; instead, it injects structural information into language modeling by modulating attention weights in the Transformer with features extracted from the dependency graph that is incrementally constructed along with token prediction. In our experiments, GiLT with semantic dependency graphs achieves better syntactic generalization while maintaining competitive perplexity in comparison with Transformer language model baselines. In addition, GiLT can be finetuned from a pretrained language model to achieve improved downstream task performance. Our code is released at https://github.com/cookie-pie-oops/GiLT-LM.

Abstract:
Multimodal Stance Detection (MSD) is crucial for understanding public discourse, yet effectively fusing text and image, especially with conflicting signals, remains challenging. Existing methods often face difficulties with contextual grounding, cross-modal interpretation ambiguity, and single-pass reasoning fragility. To address these, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Multi-agent Stance Detection (MM-StanceDet), a novel multi-agent framework integrating Retrieval Augmentation for contextual grounding, specialized Multimodal Analysis agents for nuanced interpretation, a Reasoning-Enhanced Debate stage for exploring perspectives, and Self-Reflection for robust adjudication. Extensive experiments on five datasets demonstrate MM-StanceDet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, validating the efficacy of its multi-agent architecture and structured reasoning stages in addressing complex multimodal stance challenges.

Abstract:
Decision-making is a cognitively intensive task that requires synthesizing relevant information from multiple unstructured sources, weighing competing factors, and incorporating subjective user preferences. Existing methods, including large language models and traditional decision-support systems, fall short: they often overwhelm users with information or fail to capture nuanced preferences accurately. We present Decisive, an interactive decision-making framework that combines document-grounded reasoning with Bayesian preference inference. Our approach grounds decisions in an objective option-scoring matrix extracted from source documents, while actively learning a user’s latent preference vector through targeted elicitation. Users answer pairwise tradeoff questions adaptively selected to maximize information gain over the final decision. This process converges efficiently, minimizing user effort while ensuring recommendations remain transparent and personalized. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms both general-purpose LLMs and existing decision-making frameworks achieving up to 20% improvement in decision accuracy over strong baselines across domains.

Abstract:
Despite growing interest in NL2GQL, benchmarking progress has been constrained by the lack of resources that are simultaneously large-scale, cross-domain, and cross-dialect. To address this gap, we present GQLBench, a new benchmark built through an automated and scalable framework that integrates NL2SQL-to-NL2GQL conversion with graph-native data generation. GQLBench supports execution-based evaluation on both Cypher and ISO-GQL, covering hundreds of graph databases and over 20k natural language questions for each dialect. By combining converted data from mature NL2SQL resources with synthetic graph-specific queries, it captures both schema diversity from real-world relational sources and graph-native reasoning challenges, including long paths and cycles. Beyond overall performance comparison, GQLBench also enables fine-grained evaluation across dialects, graph patterns, and query complexity. Experiments on advanced LLMs show that even strong proprietary models struggle on GQLBench, with gemini-3-flash achieving only 35.40% average execution accuracy across the two dialects. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/qxssadf/GQLBench.

Abstract:
The rapid rise in AI conference submissions has driven increasing exploration of large language models (LLMs) for peer review support. However, LLM-based reviewers often generate superficial, formulaic comments lacking substantive, evidence-grounded feedback. We attribute this to the underutilization of two key components of human reviewing: explicit rubrics and contextual grounding in existing work. To address this, we introduce ReviewBench, a benchmark evaluating review text according to paper-specific rubrics derived from official guidelines, the paper’s content, and human-written reviews. We further propose ReviewGrounder, a rubric-guided, tool-integrated multi-agent framework that decomposes reviewing into drafting and grounding stages, enriching shallow drafts via targeted evidence consolidation. Experiments on ReviewBench show that ReviewGrounder, using a Phi-4-14B-based drafter and a GPT-OSS-120B-based grounding stage, consistently outperforms baselines with substantially stronger/larger backbones (e.g., GPT-4.1 and DeepSeek-R1-670B) in both alignment with human judgments and rubric-based review quality across 8 dimensions. The code is available at https://github.com/EigenTom/ReviewGrounder.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) grow increasingly powerful, ensuring their safety and alignment with human values remains a critical challenge. Current alignment approaches predominantly rely on refusal alignment, such as training models to refuse harmful prompts or implementing filters at various stages to block certain responses. These methods are designed toward a binary outcome: either denying to answer the question entirely or answering with full access to the model’s parametric knowledge. The binary nature of current alignment approaches presents significant limitations. These methods often fail to balance safety and utility, resulting in either overly cautious responses or overlooking subtle harmful content. They also prevent users from accessing benign information when it’s mixed with harmful content. For instance, a model might refuse to provide basic, public information about a medication’s composition due to misuse concerns. Furthermore, these approaches struggle with context-dependent sensitivity, potentially over-censoring harmless content or missing nuanced harmful outputs. Ideally, LLMs should offer informative responses while avoiding the disclosure of harmful and sensitive information. To address these challenges, we introduce HiddenGuard, a novel framework for fine-grained safe generation in LLMs. Our method incorporates PRISM (rePresentation Router for In-Stream Moderation), a specialized moudule that operates alongside the LLM architecture. By leveraging intermediate hidden states, HiddenGuard enables real-time, token-level harmfulness detection and redaction, without loss in capability. This approach captures deeper semantic information, allowing for more nuanced and context-aware content control compared to traditional filtering techniques. Consequently, the model can generate informative responses while selectively redacting or replacing sensitive information, rather than refusing to answer outright. We also contribute a comprehensive dataset with token-level fine-grained annotations of potentially harmful information across diverse contexts. Our experiments demonstrate that HiddenGuard achieves over 90% in F1 score for detecting and redacting harmful content while preserving the overall utility and informativeness of the model’s responses.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) web agents are increasingly used for web navigation but remain far from human reliability on realistic, long-horizon tasks. Existing evaluations focus primarily on end-to-end success, offering limited insight into where failures arise. We propose a hierarchical planning framework that analyzes web agents across three layers (i.e., high-level planning, low-level execution, and re-planning), enabling process-based evaluation of reasoning, grounding, and recovery. Our experiments show that structured Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) plans produce more concise and goal-directed strategies than natural language (NL) plans, but low-level execution remains the dominant bottleneck. These results indicate that improving perceptual grounding and adaptive control, not only high-level reasoning, is critical for achieving human-level reliability. This hierarchical perspective provides a principled foundation for diagnosing and advancing LLM web agents.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) routers dynamically select optimal models for given inputs. Existing approaches typically assume access to ground-truth labeled data, which is often unavailable in practice, especially when user request distributions are heterogeneous and unknown. We introduce Routing with Generated Data (RGD), a challenging setting in which routers are trained exclusively on generated queries and answers produced from high-level task descriptions by generator LLMs. We evaluate query-answer routers (using both queries and labels) and query-only routers across four diverse benchmarks and 12 models, finding that query-answer routers degrade faster than query-only routers as generator quality decreases. Our analysis reveals two crucial characteristics of effective generators: they must accurately respond to their own questions, and their questions must produce sufficient performance differentiation among the model pool. We then show how filtering for these characteristics can improve the quality of generated data. We further propose CASCAL, a novel query-only router that estimates model correctness through consensus voting and identifies model-specific skill niches via hierarchical clustering. CASCAL is substantially more robust to generator quality, outperforming the best query-answer router by 4.6% absolute accuracy when trained on weak generator data.

Abstract:
Consistent reasoning about 3D spatial relations across changing viewpoints is fundamental for Embodied AI agents operating in dynamic environments. While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have advanced multimodal perception, their ability to maintain spatial consistency across diverse perspectives remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily assess spatial capabilities from a static, single-view, and egocentric perspective, failing to capture the dynamic nature of real-world spatial cognition.To address this gap, we introduce SCOPE ( S patial CO nsistency across PE rspectives and Viewpoints), a comprehensive benchmark designed to rigorously diagnose spatial reasoning capabilities. Grounded in human cognitive theories of dual spatial representations, SCOPE discretizes the 360∘ field into multiview scenarios to systematically evaluate both allocentric and egocentric reasoning capabilities. Our dataset comprises 20.1K spatial VQA pairs derived from high-quality 3D environments. Through an extensive evaluation of 26 state-of-the-art LVLMs, we identify two fundamental limitations that prevent consistent spatial understanding across viewpoints.We hope SCOPE facilitates the diagnosis of spatial reasoning, serving as a stepping stone toward reliable embodied action.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) of large language models often suffers from task interference and catastrophic forgetting. Recent approaches alleviate this issue by isolating task-critical parameters during training. However, these methods represent a static solution to a dynamic problem, assuming that parameter importance remains fixed once identified. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that parameter importance exhibits temporal drift over the course of training. To address this, we propose Evolving Parameter Isolation (EPI), a fine-tuning framework that adapts isolation decisions based on online estimates of parameter importance. Instead of freezing a fixed subset of parameters, EPI periodically updates isolation masks using gradient-based signals, enabling the model to protect emerging task-critical parameters while releasing outdated ones to recover plasticity. Experiments on diverse multi-task benchmarks demonstrate that EPI consistently reduces interference and forgetting compared to static isolation and standard fine-tuning, while improving overall generalization. Our analysis highlights the necessity of synchronizing isolation mechanisms with the evolving dynamics of learning diverse abilities.

Abstract:
Competitive programming has become a rigorous benchmark for evaluating the reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). The International Olympiad in Informatics (IOI) stands out as one of the most prestigious annual competitions in competitive programming and has become a key benchmark for comparing human and AI-level programming ability. While several proprietary models have been claimed to achieve gold medal-level performance at the IOI, often with undisclosed methods, achieving comparable results with open-weight models remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we present GenCluster, a scalable and reproducible test-time compute framework that attains IOI gold-level performance using open-weight models. It combines large-scale generation, behavioral clustering, ranking, and a round-robin submission strategy to efficiently explore diverse solution spaces under limited validation budgets. Our experiments show that the performance of our proposed approach scales consistently with available compute, narrowing the gap between open and closed systems. Notably, we will show that GenCluster can achieve a gold medal at IOI 2025 for the first time with an open-weight model gpt-oss-120b, setting a new benchmark for transparent and reproducible evaluation of reasoning in LLMs.

Abstract:
How predictable a word is can be generally quantified in two ways: using human responses to the cloze task or using probabilities from language models (LMs). When used as predictors of processing effort, LM probabilities outperform probabilities derived from cloze data. However, it is important to establish that LM probabilities do so for the right reasons, since different predictors can lead to different scientific conclusions about the role of prediction in language comprehension. We present evidence for three hypotheses about the apparent advantage of LM probabilities: not suffering from low resolution, distinguishing semantically similar words, and accurately assigning probabilities to low-frequency words. These results call for efforts to improve the resolution of cloze studies, coupled with experiments on whether human-like prediction is also as sensitive to the fine-grained distinctions made by LM probabilities.

Abstract:
Key-Value (KV) cache compression techniques have improved the efficiency of long-context summarization in Large Language Models (LLMs), but their impact on model hallucination remains underexplored. In this paper, we present the first systematic study of how KV cache compression affects hallucination in long-context summarization, demonstrating that aggressive compression can increase hallucination scores by up to 3.36× compared to the baseline. To mitigate this issue, we propose HalluKV, a decoding-phase strategy that selectively removes generated KV pairs from retrieval heads responsible for retrieving critical information from source context, thereby anchoring their attention on the preserved source information. Our approach maintains computational efficiency while significantly reducing hallucination across multiple models and datasets, achieving up to 5.48 average point reductions on Llama-3-8B-Instruct, enabling more trustworthy long-context summarization.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) evolve from conversational assistants into agents capable of handling complex tasks, they are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains. However, existing benchmarks largely rely on mixed queries and posterior evaluation, output-level scoring, which quantifies hallucination severity but offers limited insight into where and why hallucinations arise in the generation pipeline. We therefore reformulate hallucination evaluation as a diagnostic problem and propose PRISM, a controlled benchmark that disentangles hallucinations into four dimensions: knowledge missing, knowledge errors, reasoning errors, and instruction-following errors, grounded in three stages of generation (memory, instruction, and reasoning). PRISM contains 9,448 instances across 65 tasks and supports fine-grained, stage-aware diagnostic evaluation. Evaluating 24 mainstream open-source and proprietary LLMs, we uncover consistent trade-offs across instruction following, memory retrieval, and logical reasoning, showing that mitigation strategies often improve specific dimensions at the expense of others.We hope PRISM provides a framework for understanding the specific mechanisms behind LLMs hallucinations, ultimately accelerating the development of trustworthy large language models.

Abstract:
We propose VC-Inspector, a lightweight, open-source large multimodal model (LMM) for reference-free evaluation of video captions, with a focus on factual accuracy. Unlike existing metrics that suffer from limited context handling, weak factuality assessment, or reliance on proprietary services, VC-Inspector offers a reproducible, fact-aware alternative that aligns closely with human judgments. To enable robust training and interpretable evaluation, we introduce a systematic approach for generating captions with controllable errors, paired with graded quality scores and explanatory annotations. Experiments show that VC-Inspector achieves state-of-the-art correlation with human judgments, generalizing across diverse domains (e.g., VATEX-Eval, Flickr8K-Expert, and Flickr8K-CF benchmarks) and revealing the potential for caption improvement.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become the backbone of knowledge-intensive multi-hop question answering, yet routing every sub-query through a frontier model turns every hop into a cost multiplier and makes real-world deployment prohibitively expensive. Existing remedies either fix the retrieval schedule, route once at the query level, or lack a principled stopping rule, leaving a critical gap: no framework adapts, hop by hop, to how a trajectory actually unfolds. We introduce RAG-on-a-Diet, a lightweight reinforcement-learning agent that treats each reasoning hop as an independent decision and selects the smallest model (Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-30B, or DS-R1-671B) sufficient for it, guided by entity- and confidence-aware features. Trained via behavior cloning followed by PPO under a five-component cost-aware reward (final, cumulative, step-wise, cost, balance) and coupled with an explicit two-tier termination policy (5-hop cap plus a tau=0.3 confidence gate), the agent carves a Pareto-optimal efficiency frontier. On HotpotQA it cuts Monetary Inference Cost by 60.07% against IRCoT with only a 3.7% F1 drop; it matches Adaptive-RAG’s F1 at 37.30% lower cost; and it attains up to 2.33x higher Quality-per-Monetary-Cost. Consistent gains on MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA, CRAG, and Bamboogle confirm strong out-of-distribution robustness, setting a new paradigm for fine-grained resource control in multi-hop RAG.

Abstract:
Clinical language models (LMs) are increasingly applied to support clinical risk prediction from free-text notes, yet their uncertainty estimates often remain poorly calibrated and clinically unreliable. In this work, we propose Clinical Uncertainty Risk Alignment (CURA), a framework that aligns clinical LM-based risk estimates and uncertainty with both individual error likelihoods and cohort-level ambiguities. CURA first fine-tunes domain-specific clinical LMs to obtain task-adapted patient embeddings, and then performs uncertainty fine-tuning of a multi-head classifier using a bi-level uncertainty objective. Specifically, an individual-level calibration term aligns predictive uncertainty with each patient’s likelihood of error, while a cohort-aware regularizer pulls risk estimates toward event rates in their local neighborhoods in the embedding space and places extra weight on ambiguous cohorts near the decision boundary. We further show that this cohort-aware term can be interpreted as a cross-entropy loss with neighborhood-informed soft labels, providing a label-smoothing view of our method. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-IV clinical risk prediction tasks across various clinical LMs show that CURA consistently improves calibration metrics without substantially compromising discrimination. Further analysis illustrates that CURA reduces overconfident false reassurance and yields more trustworthy uncertainty estimates for downstream clinical decision support.

Abstract:
Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) continues to be a significant issue, particularly in tasks like question answering, where models often generate plausible yet incorrect or irrelevant information. Although various methods have been proposed to mitigate hallucinations, the relationship between attention patterns and hallucinations has not been fully explored. In this paper, we analyze the distribution of attention scores across each layer and attention head of LLMs, revealing a common and intriguing phenomenon: Shallow layers of LLMs primarily rely on uniform attention patterns, where the model distributes its attention evenly across the entire sequence. This uniform attention pattern can lead to hallucinations, as the model fails to focus on the most relevant information. To mitigate this issue, we propose a training-free method called Attention Replacement Technique (ART), which replaces these uniform attention patterns in the shallow layers with local attention patterns. This change directs the model to focus more on the relevant contexts, thus reducing hallucinations. Through extensive experiments, ART demonstrates significant reductions in hallucinations across multiple LLM architectures, proving its effectiveness and generalizability without requiring fine-tuning or additional training data.

Abstract:
Cross-architecture GPU code transpilation is essential for unlocking low-level hardware portability, yet no scalable solution exists. We introduce CASS, the first dataset and model suite for source- and assembly-level GPU translation (CUDA ↔ HIP, SASS ↔ RDNA3). CASS contains 60k verified host-device code pairs, enabling learning-based translation across both ISA and runtime boundaries. We generate each sample using our automated pipeline that scrapes, translates, compiles, and aligns GPU programs across vendor stacks. Leveraging CASS, we train a suite of domain-specific translation models that achieve 88.2% accuracy on CUDA → HIP and 69.1% on SASS → RDNA3, outperforming commercial baselines including GPT-5.1, Claude-4.5, and Hipify by wide margins. Generated code matches native performance in 85% of cases, preserving both runtime and memory behavior. To support rigorous evaluation, we introduce CASS-Bench, a curated benchmark spanning 18 GPU domains with ground-truth execution. All data, models, and evaluation tools will be released as open source to support progress in GPU compiler tooling, binary compatibility, and LLM-guided code translation.

Abstract:
English financial NLP has progressed rapidly through benchmarks for sentiment, document understanding, and financial question answering, while Arabic financial NLP remains comparatively under-explored despite strong practical demand for trustworthy finance and Islamic-finance assistants. We introduce SAHM, a document-grounded benchmark and instruction-tuning dataset for Arabic financial NLP and Shari’ah-compliant reasoning. SAHM contains 14,380 expert-verified instances spanning seven tasks: AAOIFI standards QA, fatwa-based QA/MCQ, accounting and business exams, financial sentiment analysis, extractive summarization, and event–cause reasoning, curated from authentic regulatory, juristic, and corporate sources. We evaluate 19 strong open and proprietary LLMs using task-specific metrics and rubric-based scoring for open-ended outputs, and find that Arabic fluency does not reliably translate to evidence-grounded financial reasoning: models are substantially stronger on recognition-style tasks than on generation and causal reasoning, with the largest gaps on event–cause reasoning. We release the benchmark, evaluation framework, and an instruction-tuned model to support future research on trustworthy Arabic financial NLP.

Abstract:
Human conversation relies heavily on conversational implicature, in which speakers convey meanings that are suggested rather than explicitly stated. Although recent large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong conversational fluency, they remain unreliable when interpretation depends on reasoning that integrates social and contextual cues, a process rarely articulated in text. We introduce DRinQ, a benchmark for evaluating pragmatic reasoning about conversational implicature in question utterances, designed to isolate pragmatic variation while holding each question’s surface form fixed. To support scalable evaluation, we propose a semi-automated pipeline that produces question-context-interpretation instances with systematic variation. Across evaluations, we find a consistent generation-inference asymmetry: while state-of-the-art models can generate plausible pragmatic scenarios when guided, they often fail to recover the intended implication at inference time. For smaller models, structured prompting improves alignment with human judgments. A comparative writing study further reveals complementary strengths: human authors tend to produce safer, predictable contexts, whereas models generate varied scenarios with interpretations that sometimes exceed contextual support. These findings highlight persistent challenges in modeling conversational implicature and motivate more context-sensitive evaluation frameworks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle to use tools reliably in domain-specific settings, where APIs may be idiosyncratic, under-documented, or tailored to private workflows. This highlights the need for effective adaptation to task-specific tools. We propose RIMRULE, a neuro-symbolic approach for LLM adaptation based on dynamic rule injection. Compact, interpretable rules are distilled from failure traces and injected into the prompt during inference to improve task performance. These rules are proposed by the LLM itself and consolidated using a Minimum Description Length (MDL) objective that favors generality and conciseness. Each rule is stored in both natural language and a structured symbolic form, supporting efficient retrieval at inference time. Experiments on tool-use benchmarks show that this approach improves accuracy on both seen and unseen tools without modifying LLM weights. It outperforms prompting-based adaptation methods and complements finetuning, offering an interpretable layer of inference-time generalization. Moreover, rules learned from one LLM can be reused to improve others, including long reasoning LLMs, highlighting the portability of symbolic knowledge across architectures.

Abstract:
Linking FDA-approved medical devices to their underlying United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) patents enables critical applications such as recall root-cause analysis, M&A-driven IP discovery, and technology trajectory mapping. However, this cross-domain entity linking task remains unexplored due to severe semantic gaps: FDA documents focus on clinical outcomes, while patents describe technical mechanisms, yielding minimal lexical overlap. We formalize medical device-patent linking as a challenging cross-domain entity linking problem characterized by label scarcity and domain shifts. Using cardiovascular devices as a high-impact, representative domain featuring diverse technologies, high recall rates, and abundant disclosures, we construct a benchmark with 434 devices, 698K patents, and 585 high-fidelity expert-verified pairs. To address these challenges, we propose Bridge-MedDevKG, a coarse-to-fine framework that integrates (1) MedDevOnto, a domain-specific ontology that anchors device concepts via three-tier UMLS normalization; (2) Multi-signal candidate generation fusing company affiliation, semantic similarity, and ontology-weighted entity overlap; and (3) Heterogeneous reranking with multi-signal scoring and XGBoost classification on hard negatives. Our approach achieves a conservative lower-bound recall of 91.6% on the gold standard with 50.9% noise reduction, substantially outperforming LLM baselines under comparable evaluation. The resulting MedDevKG provides 6.8M high-confidence links, laying a scalable foundation for regulatory-IP integration across medical specialties.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have fundamentally reshaped speech-to-speech (S2S) systems, enabling increasingly natural spoken interaction. However, existing benchmarks still rely heavily on text-based evaluation and largely ignore paralinguistic cues such as prosody, emotion, and speaker traits, which are central to expressive and human-like communication. We introduce S2S-Arena, a speech-native benchmark for evaluating instruction-following S2S models with explicit assessment of both semantic understanding and paralinguistic expression. S2S-Arena features a four-level interaction protocol that systematically probes models under increasing paralinguistic complexity, a two-stage data construction pipeline that produces 1,243 speech samples spanning 100+ real-world tasks, and an arena-style evaluation framework that enables reference-free, pairwise comparison directly in the speech modality. Benchmarking 10 state-of-the-art S2S systems over 1,000+ comparisons reveals substantial performance gaps (especially under complex paralinguistic demands) between current academic and industrial systems. Our analysis further identifies key design factors governing expressive instruction following, providing actionable insights for building more natural, robust, and human-aligned speech agents.

Abstract:
Decoder-only large language models achieve strong broad performance but are brittle to minor grammatical perturbations, undermining reliability for downstream reasoning. However, directly injecting explicit syntactic structure into an existing checkpoint can interfere with its pretrained competence. We introduce a checkpoint-compatible gated tree cross-attention (GTCA) branch that reads precomputed constituency chunk memory while leaving backbone architecture unchanged. Our design uses a token update mask and staged training to control the scope and timing of structural updates. Across benchmarks and transformer backbones, GTCA strengthens syntactic robustness beyond continued-training baselines without compromising Multiple-Choice QA performance or commonsense reasoning, providing a practical checkpoint-compatible route to more syntax-robust decoder-only LLMs.

Abstract:
Spatial language understanding is fundamental to tasks from robot navigation to document analysis, yet current work exhibits biases toward English and prepositional marking. We present a multilingual framework and benchmark decomposing spatial relations into surface elements (figure, ground, predicate, markers) and semantic components (dynamicity, stasis). Evaluating frontier LLMs on Spanish, Basque, and Chinese with text-only input, we find high accuracy on figure and ground identification but persistent gaps in two areas: semantic classification of topological and projective relations, and surface identification of morphological spatial markers—Basque case affixes proving most challenging at as low as 15.3%. These results suggest that surface parsing does not entail spatial understanding, and that evaluation must include typologically diverse spatial marking strategies.

Abstract:
The recent explosion of large language models (LLMs), each with its own general or specialized strengths, makes scalable, reliable benchmarking more urgent than ever. Standard practices nowadays face fundamental trade-offs: closed-ended question-based benchmarks (MMLU) struggle with saturation as newer models emerge, while crowd-sourced leaderboards (Chatbot Arena) rely on costly and slow human judges. Recently, automated methods (LLM-as-a-judge) shed light on the scalability, but risk bias by relying on one or a few “authority” models. To tackle these issues, we propose Decentralized Arena (), a fully automated framework leveraging collective intelligence from all LLMs to evaluate each other. It mitigates single-model judge bias by democratic, pairwise evaluation, and remains efficient at scale through two key components: (1) a coarse-to-fine ranking algorithm for fast incremental insertion of new models with sub-quadratic complexity, and (2) an automatic question selection strategy for the construction of new evaluation dimensions. Across extensive experiments across 66 LLMs, attains up to 97% correlation with human judgements, while significantly reducing the cost.

Abstract:
Deploying large language models (LLMs) in resource-constrained environments is hindered by heavy computational and memory requirements. We present LBLLM, a lightweight binarization framework that achieves effective W(1+1)A4 quantization through a novel three-stage quantization strategy. The framework proceeds as follows: (1) initialize a high-quality quantized model via PTQ; (2) quantize binarized weights, group-wise bitmaps, and quantization parameters through layer-wise distillation while keeping activations in full precision; and (3) training learnable activation quantization factors to dynamically quantize activations to 4 bits. This decoupled design mitigates interference between weight and activation quantization, yielding greater training stability and better inference accuracy. LBLLM, trained only using 0.016B tokens with a single GPU, surpasses existing state-of-the-art binarization methods on W2A4 quantization settings across tasks of language modeling, commonsense QA, and language understanding. These results demonstrate that extreme low-bit quantization of LLMs can be both practical and highly effective without introducing any extra high-precision channels or rotational matrices commonly used in recent PTQ-based works, offering a promising path toward efficient LLM deployment in resource-limited situations.

Abstract:
Automated schedule generation for multitask from natural language descriptions has huge potential in modern industry. While classic methods bypass language complexities by using pre-formatted matrices, and recent LLM+solver approaches introduce new fragilities by relying on solver-specific code generation. This raises critical questions: Can large language models (LLMs) solve this NL ⇒ Schedule task end-to-end well(RQ1)? If the answer is "no", where do they fall short(RQ2)? And how can their capabilities be enhanced (RQ3)? To answer these questions, we introduce NL ⇒ Schedule, the first benchmark for this task, equipped with a dataset of 240 description-schedule pairs constructed from real-world materials and a rigorous evaluation suite. Our evaluation of nine state-of-the-art LLMs reveals the limitations of different LLMs in procedure grounding and the strengths of advanced LLMs in global planning via local analysis. To address these shortcomings, we propose Mans, a novel multi-agent framework. Extensive experiments show that Mans achieves more robust performance comparable to six state-of-the-art LLM+solver methods. We hope NL ⇒ Schedule and Mans will serve as a solid foundation for automatic scheduling.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit exceptional performance but pose inherent risks of generating toxic content, restricting their safe deployment. While traditional methods (e.g., alignment) adjust output preferences, they fail to eliminate underlying toxic regions in parameters, leaving models vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Prior mechanistic studies characterize toxic regions as "toxic vectors" or "layer-wise subspaces", yet our analysis identifies critical limitations: i) Removed toxic vectors can be reconstructed via linear combinations of non-toxic vectors, demanding targeting of entire toxic subspace; ii) Contrastive objective over limited samples inject noise into layer-wise subspaces, hindering stable extraction. These highlight the challenge of identifying robust toxic subspace and removing them. Therefore, we propose GLOSS (GLobal tOxic Subspace Suppression), a lightweight method that mitigates toxicity by identifying and eliminating this global subspace from FFN parameters. Experiments on LLMs (e.g., Qwen3) show GLOSS achieves SOTA detoxification while preserving general capabilities without requiring large-scale retraining.

Abstract:
Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users requires incorporating extensive interaction histories and profiles, but input token constraints make this impractical due to high inference latency and API costs. Existing approaches rely on heuristic methods such as selecting recent interactions or prompting summarization models to compress user profiles. However, these methods treat context as a monolithic whole and fail to consider how LLMs internally process and prioritize different profile components. We investigate whether LLMs’ attention patterns can effectively identify important personalization signals for intelligent context compression. Through preliminary studies on representative personalization tasks, we discover that (a) LLMs’ attention patterns naturally reveal important signals, and (b) fine-tuning enhances LLMs’ ability to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant information. Based on these insights, we propose Attn-GS , an attention-guided context compression framework that leverages attention feedback from a marking model to mark important personalization sentences, then guides a compression model to generate task-relevant, high-quality compressed user contexts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Attn-GS significantly outperforms various baselines across different tasks, token limits, and settings, achieving performance close to using full context while reducing token usage by 50 times.

Abstract:
Contextual causal reasoning is a critical yet challenging capability for Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing benchmarks, however, often evaluate this skill in fragmented settings, failing to ensure context consistency or cover the full causal hierarchy. To address this, we pioneer METER to systematically benchmark LLMs across all three levels of the causal ladder under a unified context setting. Our extensive evaluation of various LLMs reveals a significant decline in proficiency as tasks ascend the causal hierarchy. To diagnose this degradation, we conduct a deep mechanistic analysis via both error pattern identification and internal information flow tracing. Our analysis reveals two primary failure modes: (1) LLMs are susceptible to distraction by causally irrelevant but factually correct information at lower level of causality; and (2) as tasks ascend the causal hierarchy, faithfulness to the provided context degrades, leading to a reduced performance. We belive our work advances our understanding of the mechanisms behind LLM contextual causal reasoning and establishes a critical foundation for future research. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/SCUNLP/METER.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) have substantially improved Text-to-SQL generation, a pronounced gap remains between AI systems and human experts on challenging benchmarks such as BIRD-SQL. We argue this gap stems largely from the prevailing single-pass paradigm, which lacks the iterative reasoning, schema exploration, and error-correction behaviors that humans naturally employ. To address this limitation, we introduce SQL-Trail, a multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) agentic framework for Text-to-SQL. Rather than producing a query in one shot, SQL-Trail interacts with the database environment and uses execution feedback to iteratively refine its predictions. Our approach centers on two key ideas: (i) an adaptive turn-budget allocation mechanism that scales the agent’s interaction depth to match question difficulty, and (ii) a composite reward panel that jointly incentivizes SQL correctness and efficient exploration. Across benchmarks, SQL-Trail sets a new state of the art and delivers strong data efficiency—up to 18× higher than prior single-pass RL state-of-the-art methods. Notably, our 7B and 14B models outperform substantially larger proprietary systems by 5% on average, underscoring the effectiveness of interactive, agentic workflows for robust Text-to-SQL generation.

Abstract:
Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) aims to generate answers by jointly understanding the textual, layout, and visual elements within document images. Although end-to-end vision-based generative methods have reduced dependency on OCR, they still struggle to achieve precise evidence localization when page semantics are complex and highly similar. However, existing research lacks an in-depth theoretical analysis of the question-driven semantic representation space, failing to fundamentally address the distinguishability problem among semantically similar pages. To fill this theoretical gap, we propose and prove that, given a specific question, each page possesses a unique semantic representation, and there exists a bijective mapping between the page and its unique semantics. Based on this theoretical foundation, we introduce the F low-Based Page U nique Semantic M apping A rchitecture ( FUMA ), which reconstructs evidence localization from similarity-based retrieval into precise selection on unique semantics. FUMA employs fine-grained cross-modal attention to extract discriminative cues and utilizes flow-based reversible transformations with likelihood regularization to learn bijective mappings, ensuring that each page obtains a unique semantic representation. Moreover, a multi-expert collaboration mechanism complementarily models fine-grained multimodal information within each page, achieving robust answer generation. Experimental results demonstrate that FUMA significantly outperforms existing methods in both evidence localization and answer generation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are playing an increasingly pivotal role in LegalAI. However, existing benchmarks are primarily tailored for legal professionals, emphasizing deep reasoning and explainability. While public-facing legal applications demand outputs that are direct, actionable, and accessible, a need largely overlooked by current evaluation frameworks. To bridge this gap, we propose a public-oriented LegalAI benchmark grounded in legal functionalism and genre analysis. Specifically, we categorize public legal demands into two core tasks: Instant Question Answering and Legal Text Generation. We further introduce three public-oriented evaluation dimensions: legal normativity, content relevance, and format usability, which collectively assess the practical validity and user readiness of model outputs. To reflect real-world lay user usage, we evaluate 17 LLMs on Pub-LawBench using only simple prompts and Chain-of-Thought under a vanilla inference setting, excluding complex techniques like RAG or agent-based methods inaccessible to non-experts. Experiments reveal limitations of current LLMs in delivering effective public-oriented legal assistance, highlighting the need for more user-centric model development and benchmarking. Our code and datasets are available for review at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/P-LawBench-E565/.

Abstract:
We introduce SWAN (Semantic Watermarking with Abstract Meaning Representation), a novel framework that embeds watermark signatures into the semantic structure of a sentence using Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR). In contrast to existing watermarking methods, which typically encode signatures by adjusting token selection preferences during text generation, SWAN embeds the signature directly in the sentence’s semantic representation. As the signature is encoded at the semantic structure level, any paraphrase that preserves meaning, automatically preserves the signature. SWAN is training-free: watermark injection is achieved by prompting an LLM to generate sentences guided by a selected AMR template while maintaining contextual coherence, and detection uses an off-the-shelf AMR parser followed by a simple one-proportion z-test. Empirical evaluation on the RealNews benchmark shows SWAN matches state-of-the-art detection performance on unaltered watermarked text, while significantly improving robustness against paraphrasing, increasing detection AUC by up to 13.9 percentage points compared to prior methods. These results demonstrate that SWAN’s approach of anchoring watermarks in AMR semantic structures provides a simple, effective, and prompt-based method for robust text provenance verification under paraphrasing, opening new avenues for semantic-level watermarking research.

Abstract:
Recent advances in reasoning-oriented Large Language Models (LLMs) have been driven by the introduction of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces, where models generate intermediate reasoning traces before producing an answer. These traces, as in DeepSeek R1, are not only used to guide model inference but also serve as supervision signals for Knowledge Distillation (KD) to improve smaller models. A prevailing but under-examined implicit assumption is that these CoT traces when emitted at inference time are both semantically correct and interpretable for the end-users. While there are reasons to believe that these intermediate tokens help improve solution accuracy, in this work, we question their validity (semantic correctness) and interpretability to the end user. To isolate the effect of trace semantics, we design experiments in the Question Answering (QA) domain using a rule-based problem decomposition method. This enables us to create Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) datasets for LLMs where - each QA problem is paired with either verifiably correct or incorrect CoT traces, while always providing the correct final solution. Trace correctness at inference time is then evaluated by checking the accuracy of every sub-step in decomposed reasoning chains. To assess end-user interpretability, we finetune LLMs with three additional types of CoT traces: R1 traces, R1 trace summaries, and post-hoc explanations of R1 traces. We further conduct a human-subject study with 100 participants asking them to rate the interpretability of each trace type on a standardized Likert scale. Our experiments reveal two key findings - (1) CoT trace correctness is not reliably correlated with the model’s generation of correct final answers: correct traces led to correct solutions only for 28% test-set problems while incorrect traces don’t necessarily degrade solution accuracy. (2) In end-user interpretability studies, fine-tuning on verbose R1 traces produced the best model performance but these traces were rated as least interpretable by users, scoring on average 3.39 for interpretability and 4.59 for cognitive load metrics on a 5-point Likert scale. In contrast, the decomposed traces that are judged significantly more interpretable don’t lead to comparable solution accuracy. Together, these findings challenge the assumption in question suggesting that researchers and practitioners should decouple model supervision objectives from end-user-facing trace design.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly shape public discourse, yet most evaluations of economic and political bias have focused on high-resource Western languages and contexts. This leaves a blind spots in low-resource, multilingual regions such as Pakistan, where linguistic identity is closely tied to regional, religious, and political ideologies. We present a systematic evaluation of political bias in 13 state-of-the-art LLMs across five Pakistani languages: Urdu, Punjabi, Sindhi, Pashto, and Balochi. Our framework integrates a culturally adapted Political Compass Test (PCT) with multi-level framing analysis, capturing both ideological stance (economic/social axes) and stylistic framing (content, tone, emphasis). The prompts are aligned with 11 socio-political themes specific to the Pakistani context. The results show that while LLMs significantly reflect liberal-left orientations consistent with Western training data, they exhibit more authoritarian framing in regional languages, highlighting language-conditioned ideological modulation. We also identify model-specific bias patterns in all languages. These findings show the need for culturally grounded multilingual bias examining frameworks in NLP. Code and dataset are available.

Abstract:
Current LLM safety research predominantly focuses on mitigating Goal Hijacking, preventing attackers from redirecting a model’s high-level objective (e.g., from "summarizing emails" to "phishing users"). In this paper, we argue that this perspective is incomplete and highlight a critical vulnerability in Reasoning Alignment. We expose the inherent fragility of current alignment techniques by proposing a new adversarial prompt attack paradigm: Reasoning Hijacking. To demonstrate this vulnerability, we instantiate it via the Criteria Attack, which subverts model judgments by injecting spurious decision criteria without altering the high-level task goal. Unlike Goal Hijacking, which attempts to override the system prompt, Reasoning Hijacking keeps the task goal intact but manipulates the model’s decision-making logic by injecting spurious reasoning shortcuts. Through extensive experiments on three different tasks (toxic comment, negative review, and spam detection), we demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models are highly fragile, consistently prioritizing injected heuristic shortcuts over rigorous semantic analysis. Crucially, because the model’s explicit intent remains aligned with the user’s instructions, these attacks can bypass defenses designed to detect goal deviation (e.g., SecAlign, StruQ), revealing a fundamental blind spot in the current safety landscape. Data and code are available at [https://github.com/Yuan-Hou/criteria_attack](https://github.com/Yuan-Hou/criteria_attack).

Abstract:
Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that maximizes downstream reasoning utility rather than only topical similarity. This capability is increasingly vital for agentic retriever-in-the-loop systems such as Deep-Research. However, existing retriever evaluation benchmarks, exemplified by Bright, provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, which obscures their value inside realistic agent workflows. We introduce Bright-Pro, an evaluation framework that assesses the effectiveness of retrievers in agentic search systems. Bright-Pro covers a broad range of queries across diverse professional domains. For each query, we provide expert-annotated reasoning aspects, positive documents, a reference response, and evaluation rubrics, enabling fine-grained assessment of retriever performance. Beyond static evaluation, we further assess retrievers in the context of agentic search systems, measuring their practical utility when serving as core components within agentic workflows. Using Bright-Pro, we evaluate classical lexical, general-purpose, and reasoning-intensive retrievers, providing actionable insights for future retriever development.

Abstract:
Multilingual large language models achieve impressive cross-lingual performance despite largely monolingual pretraining. While bilingual data in pretraining corpora is widely believed to enable these abilities, details of its contributions remain unclear. We investigate this question by pretraining models from scratch under controlled conditions, comparing the standard web corpus with a monolingual-only version that removes all multilingual documents. Despite constituting only 2% of the corpus, removing bilingual data causes translation performance to drop 56% in BLEU, while behaviour on cross-lingual QA and general reasoning tasks remains stable, with training curves largely overlapping the baseline. To understand this asymmetry, we categorize bilingual data into parallel (14%), code-switching (72%), and miscellaneous documents (14%) based on the semantic relevance of content in different languages. We then conduct granular ablations by reintroducing parallel or code-switching data into the monolingual-only corpus. Our experiments reveal that parallel data almost fully restores translation performance (91% of the unfiltered baseline), whereas code-switching contributes minimally. Other cross-lingual tasks remain largely unaffected by either type. These findings reveal that translation critically depends on systematic token-level alignments from parallel data, whereas cross-lingual understanding and reasoning appear to be achievable even without bilingual data.

Abstract:
Memory-Augmented Generation (MAG) extends large language models with external memory to support long-context reasoning, but existing approaches largely rely on semantic similarity over monolithic memory stores, entangling temporal, causal, and entity information. This design limits interpretability and alignment between query intent and retrieved evidence, leading to suboptimal reasoning accuracy. In this paper, we propose MAGMA, a multi-graph agentic memory architecture that represents each memory item across orthogonal semantic, temporal, causal, and entity graphs. MAGMA formulates retrieval as policy-guided traversal over these relational views, enabling query-adaptive selection and structured context construction. By decoupling memory representation from retrieval logic, MAGMA provides transparent reasoning paths and fine-grained control over retrieval. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval demonstrate that MAGMA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art agentic memory systems in long-horizon reasoning task.

Abstract:
The conventional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm of injecting raw retrieved texts into the Large Language Model (LLM)’s context often results in suboptimal integration of retrieved information. This paper proposes to bridge retrieval results and the LLM’s reasoning ability through Verbal Annotations, analytic narratives that explicitly articulate the logical connection between a search query and retrieved contexts. Our empirical investigation reveals the potential of Verbal Annotations to substantially enhance the LLM’s ability to generate accurate, contextually-grounded responses. Motivated by this finding, we introduce Verbal-R3, a novel agentic RAG framework that consists of a Generator and a Verbal Reranker. The Generator performs iterative retrieval and reasoning, while the Verbal Reranker returns relevance scores and Verbal Annotations to guide the reasoning and answering process of the Generator. The inference process of Verbal-R3 is further refined through relevance-guided test-time scaling, which efficiently allocates test-time compute for effective trajectory expansion. Verbal-R3 achieves state-of-the-art performance on complex Question Answering benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of the proposed framework.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) typically evaluates only final outcomes, providing limited learning signal about whether the generated reasoning is consistent with the correct answer. As a result, even when ground-truth answers are available during training, on-policy rollouts can repeatedly produce reasoning that is inconsistent with the answer.We propose Answer-Guided Group Relative Policy Optimization (AG-GRPO) for masked diffusion language models (dLLMs), which generate text through iterative masked-token restoration. AG-GRPO combines standard answer-free (AF) rollouts, sampled without access to the ground-truth answer, with answer-guided (AG) rollouts. In AG rollouts, the model generates reasoning conditioned on an anchored ground-truth answer suffix, and then re-predicts the answer from the generated reasoning for reward computation. We compute group-relative advantages over the combined AF/AG rollout set, allowing answer-guided training signals to improve the answer-free policy used at test time.Across mathematics, puzzle-solving, and code-generation benchmarks, AG-GRPO consistently improves over the pretrained dLLM and prior RL method for masked dLLMs. We further analyze optimization dynamics to study how shared group-relative advantages support signal transfer and affect convergence. Our code is available at https://github.com/JuHyng/ag_grpo.

Abstract:
Accurate evaluation of conversational retrieval is pivotal for advancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. However, existing conversational retrieval benchmarks suffer from costly, sparse human annotation or rigid, unnatural automated heuristics. To address these challenges, we introduce MTR-Suite, a unified framework for auditing, synthesizing, and benchmarking retrieval. It features: (1) MTR-Eval, an LLM-based auditor quantifying alignment gaps in previous benchmarks; (2) MTR-Pipeline, a multi-agent system using greedy traversal clustering to generate high-fidelity dialogues at 1/400th human cost; and (3) MTR-Bench, a rigorous general-domain benchmark. MTR-Bench mimics production-style challenges (hard topic switching, verbosity), offering superior discriminative power. We make our code and data publicly available to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Multi-step reasoning remains challenging for language models with limited capacity. While recent reasoning distillation approaches transfer chain-of-thought supervision from large teacher models, they typically apply uniform supervision across all Transformer components, overlooking the fact that different modules contribute unequally to reasoning. We propose Module-Aware Reasoning Distillation, a parameter-efficient framework that explicitly targets key Transformer components for effective reasoning transfer. Through systematic analysis, we identify the feed-forward network projections and the output projection of self-attention as primary bottlenecks for reasoning. Based on these findings, we introduce lightweight adapter modules at these components while freezing the backbone parameters, enabling focused and efficient distillation. Our approach adopts an offline distillation setting, where a strong teacher model provides reasoning trajectories in advance, and incorporates an adaptive supervision strategy that adjusts the strength of reasoning-related losses according to problem difficulty. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over strong baselines, and ablation studies confirm the importance of both module-aware placement and adaptive supervision.

Abstract:
Automatic data visualization generation have advanced rapidly with multi-modal large language models, yet existing efforts largely focus on static charts and overlook the interactive dashboards commonly used for real-world data exploration. We introduce Dashboard2Code, a novel task that requires a model to proactively explore an interactive dashboard, acquire and integrate feedback from its own interactions (e.g., clicking and filtering), and generate code that reproduces the target dashboard. To support comprehensive evaluation, we present DashboardMimic, the first Plotly+Dash benchmark for Dashboard2Code, comprising 180 carefully designed and manually verified dashboard–code pairs spanning three difficulty levels and covering eight common real-world interaction patterns. We further propose an automated evaluation framework tailored to dashboards that combines code semantic analysis with dynamic interaction-based testing to assess visual and interaction consistency, showing strong agreement with human judgments. Experiments across a range of open- and closed-source multi-modal models reveal that even the strongest systems struggle on high-complexity dashboards and that a substantial performance gap remains between open-source and closed-source models on the Dashboard2Code task.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enables large language models to produce multi-step reasoning, yet how such reasoning-related structure is expressed during training remains poorly understood. We present Gradient-based Structural Developer (GSD), an unsupervised framework with a principled gradient aggregation view that tracks span-level gradient during fine-tuning on reasoning benchmarks to understand how models develop structured, step-by-step reasoning capabilities. Our analysis shows that while gradients at the level of individual tokens are often noisy, aggregating gradients over contiguous reasoning-related spans reveals stable and recurring directional alignment across samples. We refer to these directionally aligned patterns as aligned sequential stresses, reflecting consistent gradient organization associated with similar reasoning procedures. Beyond capturing semantically similar reasoning instances, such gradient alignment also reveals structurally similar but semantically diverse cases that share common procedural organization. These findings position GSD as a diagnostic framework for analyzing how procedural reasoning structures emerge during training, with downstream selection results serving as auxiliary evidence correlating gradient alignment with adaptation efficiency.

Abstract:
Safety alignment of large language models currently faces a central challenge: existing alignment techniques often prioritize mitigating responses to harmful prompts at the expense of overcautious behavior, leading models to incorrectly refuse benign requests. A key goal of safe alignment is therefore to improve safety while simultaneously minimizing false refusals. In this work, we introduce Energy Landscape Steering (ELS), a novel, fine-tuning free framework designed to resolve this challenge through dynamic, inference-time intervention. We trained a lightweight, external Energy-Based Model (EBM) to assign high energy to undesirable (false refusal or jailbreak) states and low energy to desirable (helpful response or safe reject) ones. During inference, the EBM maps the LLM’s internal activations to an energy landscape, and we use the gradient of the energy function to steer the hidden states toward low-energy regions in real time. This dynamically guides the model toward desirable behavior without modifying its parameters. By decoupling behavioral control from the model’s core knowledge, ELS provides a flexible and computationally efficient solution. Extensive experiments across diverse models demonstrate its effectiveness: raising compliance on the ORB-H benchmark from 57.3% to 82.6% while maintaining the baseline safety performance. Our work establishes a promising paradigm for building LLMs that simultaneously achieve high safety and low false refusal rates.

Abstract:
Traditional metrics like BLEU and BERTScore fail to capture semantic fidelity in generative text-to-text tasks. We adapt the Cross-Examination Framework (CEF) for a reference-free, multi-dimensional evaluation by treating the source and candidate as independent knowledge bases. CEF generates verifiable questions from each text and performs a cross-examination to derive three interpretable scores: Coverage, Conformity, and Consistency. Validated across translation, summarization and clinical note-generation, our framework identifies critical errors, such as content omissions and factual contradictions, missed by standard metrics. A key contribution is a systematic robustness analysis to select a stable judge model. Crucially, the strong correlation between our reference-free and with-reference modes validates CEF’s reliability without gold references. Furthermore, human expert validation demonstrates that CEF mismatching questions align with meaning-altering semantic errors higher than with non-semantic errors, particularly excelling at identifying entity-based and relational distortions.

Abstract:
Vision–Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in clinical diagnostics, yet their robustness to adversarial attacks remains largely unexplored, posing serious risks. Existing medical attacks focus on secondary objectives such as model stealing or adversarial fine-tuning, while transferable attacks from natural images introduce visible distortions that clinicians can easily detect. To address this, we propose MedFocusLeak, a highly transferable black-box multimodal attack that induces incorrect yet clinically plausible diagnoses while keeping perturbations imperceptible. The method injects coordinated perturbations into non-diagnostic background regions and employs an attention-distraction mechanism to shift the model’s focus away from pathological areas. Extensive evaluations across six medical imaging modalities show that MedFocusLeak achieves state-of-the-art performance, generating misleading yet realistic diagnostic outputs across diverse VLMs. We further introduce a unified evaluation framework with novel metrics that jointly capture attack success and image fidelity, revealing a critical weakness in the reasoning capabilities of modern clinical VLMs.

Abstract:
Transformers operate as horizontal token-by-token scanners; at each generation step, attending to an ever-growing sequence of token-level states. This access pattern increases prefill latency and makes long-context decoding more memory-bound, as KV-cache reads and writes dominate inference time over arithmetic operations. We propose Parallel Hierarchical Operation for TOp-down Networks (PHOTON), a hierarchical autoregressive model that replaces horizontal scanning with vertical, multi-resolution context scanning. PHOTON maintains a hierarchy of latent streams: a bottom-up encoder compresses tokens into low-rate contextual states, while lightweight top-down decoders reconstruct fine-grained token representations in parallel. We further introduce recursive generation that updates only the coarsest latent stream and eliminates bottom-up re-encoding. Experimental results show that PHOTON is superior to competitive Transformer-based language models regarding the throughput-quality trade-off, providing advantages in long-context and multi-query tasks. In particular, this reduces decode-time KV-cache traffic, yielding up to 10 3 × higher throughput per unit memory.

Abstract:
Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) have significantly improved performance on complex tasks by extending the reasoning chain. However, these chains are prone to containing factual errors, particularly in knowledge-intensive tasks. To address this issue, we propose CheckRLM, a framework that improves the reliability of the reasoning process through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) by timely checking and correcting factual errors. Specifically, CheckRLM extracts factual claims from the reasoning chain to identify and localize subtle knowledge inconsistencies during inference. Upon detection of errors, a refinement mechanism performs minimal-cost yet precise corrections by leveraging external knowledge, ensuring coherence between the reasoning chain and correct knowledge. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CheckRLM substantially outperforms existing baselines, exhibiting a strong capability to mitigate error accumulation in long-horizon reasoning with lower costs. The code and data are available at https://github.com/AI9Stars/CheckRLM.

Abstract:
Editing human-written text has become a standard use case of large language models (LLMs), for example, to make one’s arguments more appropriate for a discussion. Comparing human to LLM-generated edits, however, we observe a mismatch in editing strategies: While LLMs often perform multiple scattered edits and tend to change meaning notably, humans rather encapsulate dependent changes in self-contained, meaning-preserving edits. In this paper, we present a reinforcement learning approach that teaches LLMs human-like editing to improve the appropriateness of arguments. Our approach produces self-contained sentence-level edit suggestions that can be accepted or rejected independently. We train the approach using group relative policy optimization with a multi-component reward function that jointly optimizes edit-level semantic similarity, fluency, and pattern conformity as well as argument-level appropriateness. In automatic and human evaluation, it outperforms competitive baselines and the state of the art in human-like editing, with multi-round editing achieving appropriateness close to full rewriting.

Abstract:
Role-playing agents (RPAs) have made significant strides in mimicking static character identities. However, their personality simulations remain superficial, lacking a profound understanding of complex human psychological mechanisms. We identify a critical bottleneck termed "Personality Inertia"—a behavioral rigidity where RLHF-induced alignment bias traps models in a sanitized, "helpful assistant" persona. This inertia prevents models from adapting to diverse social contexts or expressing essential but negative traits under pressure. To bridge this gap, we propose PD-LLM, a situation-aware framework grounded in Trait Activation Theory. PD-LLM introduces Bipolar Latent Decomposition, which decouples personality traits into bidirectional LoRA adapters. These adapters are dynamically modulated by a situation-aware module based on the DIAMONDS taxonomy, allowing for precise behavioral regulation. Empirical results show that while baseline methods fail to synchronize multidimensional traits under pressure, PD-LLM achieves superior performance in both static fidelity and dynamic adaptability. By advancing from prompt engineering to intrinsic parameter control, PD-LLM effectively overcomes personality rigidity, facilitating the creation of vivid and psychologically consistent agents.

Abstract:
Generative reward models (GRMs) have emerged as a promising approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences by offering greater representational capacity and flexibility than traditional scalar reward models. However, GRMs face two major challenges: reliance on costly human-annotated data restricts scalability, and self-training approaches often suffer from instability and vulnerability to reward hacking. To address these issues, we propose ConsistRM, a self-training framework that enables effective and stable GRM training without human annotations. ConsistRM incorporates the Consistency-Aware Answer Reward, which produces reliable pseudo-labels with temporal consistency, thereby providing more stable model optimization. Moreover, the Consistency-Aware Critique Reward is introduced to assess semantic consistency across multiple critiques and allocates fine-grained and differentiated rewards. Experiments on five benchmark datasets across four base models demonstrate that ConsistRM outperforms vanilla Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) by an average of 1.5%. Further analysis shows that ConsistRM enhances output consistency and mitigates position bias caused by input order, highlighting the effectiveness of consistency-aware rewards in improving GRMs.Our implementation is available at https://github.com/yuliangCarmelo/ConsistRM.

Abstract:
Membership inference attack (MIA) has emerged as a promising tool for auditing the training data of LLMs, supporting data privacy and copyright protection. Most existing MIA methods rely on the assumption that LLMs assign higher confidence scores to training samples than to non-training ones.However, since LLMs generate text by sampling high-confidence tokens, they naturally produce AI-generated texts (AIGTs) that also satisfy this assumption.In this work, we empirically confirm that such AIGTs, regardless of whether they are generated by the target LLM, can lead existing MIAs to assign even higher membership likelihoods than those of true training samples, thereby significantly undermining their reliability.To address this challenge, we propose a robust membership inference framework for reliably identifying training data.Our method adopts a mixture-of-experts formulation to jointly model interactions across complementary features derived from multiple MIA methods and AIGT detectors, which can remain robust against adversarially generated samples.Furthermore, by leveraging expert components, our method provides explainable insights into the characteristics of member data.Experiments on various datasets and LLMs show that adversarial samples substantially degrade the performance of baselines, whereas our method preserves performance close to that of the unattacked setting.Codes and datasets are released at https://github.com/kong-hyh/MoMIA.

Abstract:
Smart Contracts are the foundation of Decentralized Finance (DeFi), executing financial logic without trusted intermediaries. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have substantially lowered the barrier to smart contract development by enabling code generation from natural language. However, because smart contracts are immutable and directly manage financial assets, this accessibility introduces a critical trust gap: generated contracts are easy to produce but hard to trust. To bridge this gap, we present LeVer, the first trustworthy smart contract synthesis framework that integrates LLM-based generation with Lean-based auto-formalization and Verification. LeVer employs a closed-loop multi-agent architecture to iteratively generate, verify, attack, and repair contracts, providing both formal guarantees and empirical robustness. To facilitate the adoption of automated formal verification in smart contract generation and audition, we open-source our framework and datasets at: https://github.com/gl-bowei/LeVer

Abstract:
With the rapidly improving reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is also a rising demand to use them in a wide variety of domains. This brings about the need to carefully evaluate the limits of the capabilities of these models with various tests and benchmarks. Graph structures are ubiquitous in real-world data, and are often used to represent and analyze relationship patterns within data. Many benchmarks have already been proposed in the graph literature to test the reasoning ability of LLMs to follow and execute graph algorithms. However, due to the limited context length of LLMs, these benchmarks consist of very small graphs. In real-world data, the size of graphs can be significantly larger, and in many cases, not fully accessible. In this paper, we examine a class of problems that arises with very large graphs having limited accessibility. We propose a large graph benchmark dataset, EstGraph, and introduce four distinct tasks designed to estimate large graph properties. We evaluate the reasoning abilities of LLMs on these tasks using a wide variety of graph datasets. In addition, we provide task-specific prompt constructions based on random walk sampling of large graphs (up to millions of nodes) that effectively convey sufficient information to LLMs within the limits of context length.

Abstract:
Lifelong model editing (LME) aims to sequentially rectify outdated or inaccurate knowledge in deployed LLMs while minimizing side effects on unrelated inputs. However, existing approaches typically apply parameter perturbations to a static and dense set of LLM layers for all editing instances. This practice is counter-intuitive, as we hypothesize that different pieces of knowledge are stored in distinct layers of the model. Neglecting this layer-wise specificity can impede adaptability in integrating new knowledge and result in catastrophic forgetting for both general and previously edited knowledge. To address this, we propose HiEdit, a hierarchical reinforcement learning framework that adaptively identifies the most knowledge-relevant layers for each editing instance. By enabling dynamic, instance-aware layer selection and incorporating an intrinsic reward for sparsity, HiEdit achieves precise, localized updates. Experiments on various LLMs show that HiEdit boosts the performance of the competitive RLEdit by an average of 8.48% with perturbing only half of the layers per edit. Our code is available at: https://github.com/yangfanww/hiedit.

Abstract:
Africa is home to over one-third of the world’s languages, yet remains severely underrepresented in multimodal AI research. We introduce Afri-MCQA, the first Multilingual Cultural Question-Answering benchmark containing 7.5k Q A pairs across 15 African languages from 12 countries. The benchmark offers parallel text and speech modalities and was entirely created by native speakers. We find that models show poor performance across evaluated cultures, with near-zero accuracy on open-ended VQA when queried through native language or speech. To test linguistic competence, we include control experiments meant to assess this specific aspect separate from cultural knowledge, and we observe significant performance gaps between native languages and English for both text and speech. These findings underscore the pressing need for speech-first approaches, culturally grounded pretraining, and cross-lingual cultural transfer. We release Afri-MCQA to support more inclusive multimodal AI development.

Abstract:
Multilingual language models often exhibit performance disparities across languages that can arise as early as the tokenization stage. Widely-used subword tokenization approaches favor high-resource languages, and tokenizer-free methods still yield longer sequences for scripts with a higher bytes-per-character ratio. To address these shortcomings, we propose to use the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as a language-agnostic input representation for multilingual tokenizers. IPA provides a compact symbol inventory, greater cross-lingual character overlap, and a more balanced byte-per-character distribution across languages. We train matched pairs of text vs. IPA subword tokenizers across 24 languages and 14 scripts and demonstrate that IPA tokenizers consistently improve tokenization quality, especially for non-Latin scripts, and generalize more effectively to unseen languages and scripts.

Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal LLMs and systems that use tools for long-video QA point to the promise of reasoning over hour-long episodes. However, many methods still compress content into lossy summaries or rely on limited toolsets, weakening temporal grounding and missing fine-grained cues. We propose a multi-agent framework in which a master LLM coordinates a grounding agent to localize question-relevant segments and a vision agent to extract targeted textual observations. The master agent plans with a step limit, and is trained with reinforcement learning to encourage concise, correct, and efficient multi-agent cooperation. This design helps the master agent focus on relevant clips via grounding, complements subtitles with visual detail, and yields interpretable trajectories. On our proposed LongTVQA and LongTVQA+ which are episode-level datasets aggregated from TVQA/TVQA+, our multi-agent system significantly outperforms strong non-agent baselines. Experiments also show reinforcement learning further strengthens reasoning and planning for the trained agent.

Abstract:
Instruction-following is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with user intent. While recent reasoning-oriented models exhibit impressive performance on complex mathematical problems, their ability to adhere to natural language instructions remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce MathIF, a dedicated benchmark for evaluating instruction-following in mathematical reasoning tasks. Our empirical analysis reveals a consistent tension between scaling up reasoning capacity and maintaining controllability, as models that reason more effectively often struggle to comply with user directives. We find that models tuned on distilled long chains-of-thought or trained with reasoning-oriented reinforcement learning often degrade in instruction adherence, especially when generation length increases. Furthermore, we show that even simple interventions can partially recover obedience, though at the cost of reasoning performance. These findings highlight a fundamental tension in current LLM training paradigms and motivate the need for more instruction-aware reasoning models.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in recent years, yet their ability to perform left–right reasoning in mirror contexts—a fundamental element of spatial cognition—remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MirrorQA, a manually constructed benchmark with 5,549 samples, designed to evaluate MLLMs’ capability to distinguish left from right from a subject-centered perspective. MirrorQA is built through a three-stage pipeline (annotation, verification, and final review) to ensure high-quality labeling. Comprehensive evaluations on both open- and closed-source MLLMs show that even the best-performing models achieve only 65.40% accuracy, far below the 99.28% accuracy of humans. These results highlight substantial challenges in current MLLMs when reasoning about left and right, and point to promising directions for future research. MirrorQA and its code are publicly available at anonymous link https://github.com/stargazer-zeno/MirrorQA.

Abstract:
Generative Search Engines (GSEs) have reshaped information retrieval, and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) emerges to improve the content visibility in GSEs’ responses. Previous methods mainly rely on empirical strategies or query-dependent preferences of GSEs for content optimization. However, they remain limited in effectiveness as they overlook the latent user search demands in queries that drive content retrieval and response generation of GSEs. To address this, we propose Mind Reader, a novel GEO method to effectively improve the content visibility within the generated responses of GSEs through content optimization guided by the extracted latent demands of user search. Specifically, we propose a decomposition-recombination query augmentation module, which enriches the query with latent semantic information by decomposing it into diverse perspectives, capturing underlying semantic information, and recombining them into variants to support subsequent optimization. Then, we propose a reasoning coverage content optimization module. By optimizing content to cover critical reasoning information of GSEs, we align the content with the user search demands, effectively improving the content visibility. Extensive experiments on widely used GEO-Bench and our proposed PC-GEO show that our method significantly outperforms baselines and effectively improves content visibility (with up to 2.44x objective metrics and 1.23x subjective metrics on average).

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which attempt to elicit harmful responses from LLMs. The evolving nature and diversity of these attacks pose many challenges for defense systems, including (1) adaptation to counter emerging attack strategies without costly retraining, and (2) control of the trade-off between safety and utility. To address these challenges, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Defense (RAD), a novel framework for jailbreak detection that incorporates a database of known attack examples into Retrieval-Augmented Generation, which is used to infer the underlying, malicious user query and jailbreak strategy used to attack the system. RAD enables training-free updates for newly discovered jailbreak strategies and provides a mechanism to balance safety and utility. Experiments on StrongREJECT show that RAD substantially reduces the effectiveness of strong jailbreak attacks such as PAP and PAIR while maintaining low rejection rates for benign queries. We propose a novel evaluation scheme and show that RAD achieves a robust safety-utility trade-off across a range of operating points in a controllable manner.

Abstract:
Subject-driven image generation models face a fundamental trade-off between identity preservation (fidelity) and prompt adherence (editability). While online reinforcement learning (RL), specifically GPRO, offers a promising solution, we find that a naive application of GRPO leads to competitive degradation, as the simple linear aggregation of rewards with static weights causes conflicting gradient signals and a misalignment with the temporal dynamics of the diffusion process. To overcome these limitations, we propose Customized-GRPO, a novel framework featuring two key innovations: (i) Synergy-Aware Reward Shaping (SARS), a non-linear mechanism that explicitly penalizes conflicted reward signals and amplifies synergistic ones, providing a sharper and more decisive gradient. (ii) Time-Aware Dynamic Weighting (TDW), which aligns the optimization pressure with the model’s temporal dynamics by prioritizing prompt-following in the early, identity preservation in the later. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms naive GRPO baselines, successfully mitigating competitive degradation. Our model achieves a superior balance, generating images that both preserve key identity features and accurately adhere to complex textual prompts.

Abstract:
Recent advances in reasoning models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on mathematical and coding tasks. However, their effectiveness in embodied domains, where the agent must continuously interact with environments and process observation-action interleaved trajectories, remains largely unexplored. We present Embodied-Reasoner, a reasoning model for interactive embodied tasks. Unlike mathematical reasoning that relies primarily on logical deduction, embodied scenarios demand spatial understanding, temporal reasoning, and ongoing self-reflection based on interaction history. To address these challenges, we synthesize 9.3k coherent Observation-Thought-Action trajectories containing 64k ego-centric images and 90k diverse reasoning processes (analysis, spatial reasoning, reflection, planning, and verification). We develop a three-stage training recipe that progressively enhances the model’s capabilities through imitation learning, rejection sampling tuning on self-exploration trajectories, and reflection tuning. The evaluation shows that our model significantly outperforms advanced visual reasoning models, e.g., exceeds OpenAI o1, o3-mini, and Claude-3.7 by +9%, 24%, and +13%. Analysis reveals that our model exhibits fewer repeated searches and logical inconsistencies, with particular advantages in complex long-horizon tasks. Real-world testing further validates the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Brain-tuning enhances brain alignment and downstream performance by fine-tuning speech language models with neural recordings. However, previous work relies primarily on fMRI, whose temporal resolution integrates neural activity over seconds, blending distinct processing stages into a single supervision signal and precluding temporally targeted training. We introduce ECoG-tuning, which leverages electrocorticography’s millisecond precision to train speech language models. We design temporally targeted windows—a speech window capturing acoustic-phonetic encoding and a language window capturing higher-order linguistic processing—grounded in neuroscientific findings about temporal encoding hierarchies. Evaluating three models on the Podcast ECoG dataset, we find that ECoG-tuning significantly improves brain alignment over pretrained and distillation baselines. Notably, full spatiotemporal dynamics yield 7–17% higher alignment than time-averaged supervision across models, and language-window tuning produces larger gains in higher-order language regions, indicating that temporal precision provides additional training value. Moreover, ECoG-tuned models consistently improve or maintain downstream performance. Overall, our work provides initial evidence that electrophysiology is a viable brain-tuning modality, demonstrating how neuroscientific insights into processing hierarchies can inform principled model training strategies. Code is available at [https://github.com/Mochizuki-BUPT/ECoG-Tuning-main](https://github.com/Mochizuki-BUPT/ECoG-Tuning-main).

Abstract:
Training language models and examining their linguistic behaviors have been a common protocol in computational linguistics for studying linguistic phenomena and modeling human language processing. However, work in this area is often limited to proof-of-concept demonstrations with arbitrary model configurations, without considering hyperparameter sensitivity, an important source of variation in model performance. In this work, we replicate three prior studies (Chang and Bergen, 2022; Hu et al., 2020b; Kuribayashi et al., 2024) with hyperparameters varied within a practical range, and show that modest hyperparameter changes can alter some qualitative conclusions about models’ linguistic abilities and even reverse the ranking of model performance. Our results highlight the risk that prior work may have reflected optimization artifacts rather than the genuine inductive biases of model classes, and that hyperparameter sensitivity should receive more attention as a factor that can meaningfully influence model behavior. We suggest future work to report the variation of performance across the configuration space to enhance the reliability and generalizability of conclusions. Code: https://github.com/compling-wat/tune-linguistic-lms.

Abstract:
In this work, we introduce a paralinguistic supervision paradigm for low-resource multilingual speech emotion recognition (LRM-SER) that leverages non-verbal vocalizations to exploit prosody-centric emotion cues. Unlike conventional SER systems that rely heavily on labeled verbal speech and suffer from poor cross-lingual transfer, our approach reformulates LRM-SER as non-verbal-to-verbal transfer, where supervision from a labelled non-verbal source domain is adapted to unlabeled verbal speech across multiple target languages. To this end, we propose NOVA-ARC, a geometry-aware framework that models affective structure in the Poincaré ball, discretizes paralinguistic patterns via a hyperbolic vector-quantized prosody codebook, and captures emotion intensity through a hyperbolic emotion lens. For unsupervised adaptation, NOVA-ARC performs optimal-transport-based prototype alignment between source emotion prototypes and target utterances, inducing soft supervision for unlabeled speech while being stabilized through consistency regularization. Experiments show that NOVA-ARC delivers the strongest performance under both non-verbal-to-verbal adaptation and the complementary verbal-to-verbal transfer setting, consistently outperforming Euclidean counter parts and strong SSL baselines. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to move beyond verbal-speech–centric supervision by introducing a non-verbal–to–verbal transfer paradigm for SER.

Abstract:
Millions of people use machine translation (MT) tools daily, yet little is known about their perception of what systems can and cannot do. This paper studies users’ mental models of speech translation systems through a new framework based on cross-lingual question answering, where users either accept MT output or request professional re-translation to answer questions based on the information presented in a foreign language. By analyzing user behavior and accuracy trends across varying translation qualities, we examine to what extent they can predict where the system is likely to be wrong, and how this mental model evolves. Users develop stronger mental models with practice, especially when they have some knowledge of the source language, primarily by relying on surface-level error cues. Moreover, providing speech transcriptions can help users develop better mental models. Our results show the promise of cross-lingual question answering as a downstream task for studying MT mental models and advancing our understanding of human–AI collaboration.

Abstract:
We present PEAR (Pairwise Evaluation for Automatic Relative Scoring), a supervised quality estimation (QE) metric family that reframes reference-free machine translation (MT) evaluation as a graded pairwise comparison. Given a source segment and two candidate translations, PEAR predicts the direction and magnitude of their quality difference. The metrics are trained using pairwise supervision derived from differences in human judgments, with an additional regularization term that encourages sign inversion under candidate order reversal.On the WMT24 meta-evaluation benchmark, PEAR outperforms strictly matched single-candidate QE baselines trained with the same data and backbones, isolating the benefit of the proposed pairwise formulation. Despite using substantially fewer parameters than recent large metrics, PEAR surpasses far larger QE models and reference-based metrics. Our analysis further indicates that PEAR yields a less redundant evaluation signal relative to other top metrics. Finally, we show that PEAR is an effective utility function for minimum Bayes risk (MBR) decoding, reducing pairwise scoring cost at negligible impact.

Abstract:
Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning (MMR) has recently attracted increasing attention for its capability to solve mathematical problems involving both textual and visual modalities. However, current models still face significant challenges in real-world visual math tasks, often misinterpreting diagrams, failing to align mathematical symbols with visual evidence, or producing inconsistent reasoning steps. Moreover, existing evaluations mainly focus on checking final answers rather than verifying the correctness or executability of each intermediate step. A growing body of recent research addresses these issues by integrating structured perception, explicit alignment, and verifiable reasoning within unified frameworks.To establish a clear roadmap for understanding and comparing different MMR approaches, we systematically review them around four fundamental questions: (1) What to extract from multimodal inputs, (2) How to represent and align textual and visual information, (3) How to perform the reasoning, and (4) How to evaluate the correctness of the overall reasoning process. Finally, we discuss open challenges and share our thoughts on future research directions.

Abstract:
Knowledge graphs (KGs) are increasingly integrated with large language models (LLMs) to provide structured, verifiable reasoning. A core operation in this integration is multi-hop retrieval, yet existing systems struggle to balance efficiency, scalability, and interpretability. We introduce LogosKG, a novel, hardware-aligned framework that enables scalable and interpretable k-hop retrieval on large KGs by building on symbolic KG formulations and executing traversal as hardware-efficient operations over decomposed subject, object, and relation representations. To scale to billion-edge graphs, LogosKG integrates degree-aware partitioning, cross-graph routing, and on-demand caching. Experiments show substantial efficiency gains over CPU and GPU baselines without loss of retrieval fidelity. With proven performance in KG retrieval, a downstream two-round KG-LLM interaction demonstrates how LogosKG enables large-scale, evidence-grounded analysis of how KG topology, such as hop distribution and connectivity, shapes the alignment between structured biomedical knowledge and LLM diagnostic reasoning, thereby opening the door for next-generation KG-LLM integration. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/LARK-NLP-Lab/LogosKG, and an online demo is available at https://lark-nlp-lab-logoskg.hf.space/.

Abstract:
NLP-assisted solutions to support qualitative data analysis have gained considerable traction. However, no unified evaluation framework exists which can account for the many different settings in which qualitative researchers may employ them. In this paper, we propose a framework to evaluate the way collaboration settings may produce different research outcomes across a variety of interactive systems. Specifically, we study the impact of synchronous vs. asynchronous collaboration using three different NLP-assisted qualitative research tools and present a comprehensive analysis of the differences in the consistency, cohesiveness, and correctness of their outcomes.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit complementary strengths arising from differences in pretraining data, model architectures, and decoding behaviors. Inference-time ensembling provides a practical way to combine these capabilities without retraining. However, existing ensemble approaches suffer from fundamental limitations. Most rely on fixed fusion granularity, which lacks the flexibility required for mid-generation adaptation and fails to adapt to different generation characteristics across tasks. To address these challenges, we propose AdaFuse, an adaptive ensemble decoding framework that dynamically selects semantically appropriate fusion units during generation. Rather than committing to a fixed granularity, AdaFuse adjusts fusion behavior on the fly based on the decoding context, with words serving as basic building blocks for alignment. To be specific, we introduce an uncertainty-based criterion to decide whether to apply ensembling at each decoding step. Under confident decoding states, the model continues generation directly. In less certain states, AdaFuse invokes a diversity-aware scaling strategy to explore alternative candidate continuations and inform ensemble decisions. This design establishes a synergistic interaction between adaptive ensembling and test-time scaling, where ensemble decisions guide targeted exploration, and the resulting diversity in turn strengthens ensemble quality. Experiments on open-domain QA, arithmetic reasoning, and machine translation demonstrate that AdaFuse consistently outperforms strong ensemble baselines, achieving an average relative improvement of 6.88%.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) increasingly imitate personal writing styles, personalization has become a key challenge for machine-generated text (MGT) detection. Yet personalized MGT detection remains largely underexplored. In this work, we introduce StyloBench, the first benchmark for evaluating detector robustness under personalization, built from literary and blog texts paired with their LLM-generated imitations. Experiments across diverse detectors show pronounced performance instability under personalization, with frequent inversions relative to general-domain behavior. To better understand this limitation, we conduct an in-depth analysis and attribute it to a feature-inversion trap, i.e., features that are effective for separating human-written text (HWT) from MGT in general flip their effect in personalized contexts, ultimately misleading detectors. Motivated by this, we propose StyloCheck, a diagnostic framework for predicting detector robustness under personalization. StyloCheck identifies the inverted features and quantifies detector dependence using perturbed texts pronounced in the features. In our experiments, StyloCheck predicts both the direction and magnitude of cross-domain performance shifts with an 85% correlation to actual outcomes. We hope this work will raise awareness of the structural risks introduced by personalization and motivate more robust approaches to personalized MGT detection. The code is available at: https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/Personalized_MGT_Detect

Abstract:
Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) excel at video understanding tasks where outputs are textual, such as Video Question Answering and Video Captioning. However, they underperform specialized embedding-based models in Retrieval tasks, such as Text-toVideo Retrieval and Moment Retrieval. We introduce ViLL-E (Video-LLM-Embed), a unified VideoLLM architecture endowed with a novel embedding generation mechanism that allows the model to "think longer" for complex videos and stop early for easy ones. We train this model with a three-stage training methodology combining generative and contrastive learning: initial large-scale pre-training with video-caption pairs; followed by continual training on a smaller, detailed-caption dataset; and concluding with task-specific fine-tuning on a novel multi-task dataset covering Video QA, Temporal Localization, Video Retrieval, and Video-Text Matching. Our model significantly improves temporal localization (on avg. 7% over other VideoLLMs) and video retrieval (up to 4% over dual encoder models), achieving performance comparable to state-of-the-art specialized embedding models while remaining competitive on VideoQA tasks. Furthermore, our joint contrastive-generative training unlocks new zero-shot capabilities, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art methods in composed video retrieval (+5% over SotA) and retrieval from long text (+2% over SotA).

Abstract:
We present a knowledge distillation framework for text embedding models. A key distinguishing feature is that our distilled models are compatible with their teacher, enabling flexible asymmetric architectures where documents are encoded with the larger teacher model, while queries use smaller student models. We also show that our models automatically inherit MRL and robustness to output quantization whenever these properties are present in the teacher model, without explicitly training for them. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework we publish leaf-ir, a 23M parameters information retrieval oriented model that, besides being teacher-compatibile, sets a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) on BEIR, ranking no.1 on the public leaderboard for models of its size. Asymmetric mode further increases its retrieval performance. Our scheme is however not restricted to information retrieval. We demonstrate its wider applicability by synthesizing the multi-task leaf-mt model. This also sets a new SOTA, achieving no.1 on the public MTEB v2 (English) leaderboard for models of its size. Our technique is applicable to black-box models, requires no judgments nor hard negatives, and training can be conducted using small batch sizes. Thus, dataset and training infrastructure requirements for our framework are modest. We make our models publicly available under a permissive Apache 2.0 license.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have revolutionized complex problem-solving, yet they exhibit a pervasive "overthinking", generating unnecessarily long reasoning chains. While current solutions improve token efficiency, they often sacrifice fine-grained control or risk disrupting the logical integrity of the reasoning process. To address this, we introduce Stepwise Adaptive Thinking (SAT), a framework that performs step-level, difficulty-aware pruning while preserving the core reasoning structure. SAT formulates reasoning as a Finite-State Machine (FSM) with distinct thinking modes (SLOW, NORMAL, FAST, SKIP). It navigates these states dynamically using a lightweight Process Reward Model (PRM), compressing easy steps while preserving depth for hard ones. Experiments across 9 LRMs and 7 benchmarks show that SAT achieves up to 40% reduction in reasoning tokens while generally maintaining or improving accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/byxw13/SAT_Code.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning has proven effective for enhancing multi-step reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its benefits have not fully translated to multilingual contexts. Existing methods struggle with a fundamental trade-off: prioritizing input-language consistency severely hampers reasoning quality, while prioritizing reasoning often leads to unintended language drift toward English. We address this challenge with LANG, a novel framework that leverages language-conditioned hints to guide exploration in non-English reasoning tasks. Our method incorporates two key mechanisms to prevent dependency on these hints: a progressive decay schedule that gradually withdraws scaffolding, and a language-adaptive switch that tailors learning horizons to specific language difficulties. Empirical results on challenging multilingual mathematical benchmarks reveal that LANG substantially enhances reasoning performance without compromising language consistency. Moreover, we show that our framework generalizes beyond mathematics, fostering more consistent language alignment across model layers.

Abstract:
Charts are a universally adopted medium for data communication, yet existing chart understanding benchmarks are overwhelmingly English-centric, limiting their accessibility and relevance to global audiences. To address this limitation, we introduce PolyChartQA, the first large-scale multilingual benchmark for chart question answering, comprising 22,606 charts and 26,151 QA pairs across 10 diverse languages. PolyChartQA is constructed through a scalable pipeline that enables efficient multilingual chart generation via data translation and code reuse, supported by LLM-based translation and rigorous quality control. We systematically evaluate multilingual chart understanding with PolyChartQA on state-of-the-art LVLMs and reveal a significant performance gap between English and other languages, particularly low-resource ones. Additionally, we introduce a companion multilingual chart question answering training set, PolyChartQA-Train, on which fine-tuning LVLMs yields substantial gains in multilingual chart understanding across diverse model sizes and architectures. Together, our benchmark provides a foundation for developing globally inclusive vision-language models capable of understanding charts across diverse linguistic contexts. Codes and datasets are available on https://github.com/Road2Redemption/PolyChartQA.

Abstract:
As people increasingly turn to AI for personal deliberation beyond task-oriented assistance, concerns about sycophancy in these value-laden contexts have grown. Unlike human flattery, which is intentional and self-interested, AI sycophancy emerges as a byproduct of RLHF’s reward structure for user-preference alignment. Yet the observable behavior is similar: both produce responses that preserve what users want to hear. Focusing on this phenomenon through Goffman’s face-work framework, we operationalize AI sycophancy as excessive face-saving, either active (preserving positive face through agreement) or passive (preserving negative face by withholding challenge). In a mixed-methods study ( N=31 ), participants engaged with AI across three moral dilemmas under these conditions and a non-sycophantic neutral baseline. Sycophantic responses increased decision confidence but reduced open-minded thinking; participants felt supported yet found the conversations unproductive. Neutral responses, though initially uncomfortable, promoted cognitive flexibility and meaningful deliberation. These findings reveal a confidence-competence trade-off in AI-mediated moral reasoning and suggest that effective AI for personal deliberation requires calibrated friction, not unconditional agreement.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on standard benchmarks, yet their performance is not robust across different task manifestations. It remains unclear how performance changes under controlled task rewrites that preserve the original solution structure, while varying the rewrite type and level. To address this question, we introduce ReTRE (Rewrite-based Transfer Robustness Evaluation), an evaluation benchmark inspired by learning transfer theory that probes transfer robustness along two rewrite levels: Near Transfer and Far Transfer. ReTRE employs a multi-agent system to construct textual and visual variants while preserving the structure of the original solution. Evaluations on mathematical and science tasks across state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs reveal a consistent transfer gap: performance exhibits a general declining trend as transfer similarity drops and strong text performance can face performance decline under cross-modal transfer. Crucially, we identify a divergence between post-training paradigms: reinforcement learning preserves transfer robustness, whereas supervised fine-tuning tends to overfit the training distribution, leading to severe degradation in far-transfer performance despite strong in-distribution accuracy.

Abstract:
Existing datasets for evaluating text-to-image generation focus mostly on real-life images, which poses challenges for assessing academicfigure generation given real scientific captions, which is a hot topic in AI for Science. To fill the gap, we propose HE4AFG, a novel datasetwhich first provides a Holistic Evaluation for Academic caption-to-Figure Generation (AFG). Specifically, HE4AFG collects real figure captions from 8 scientific domains and finally generates 3,900 evaluation samples (particularly, including multi-panel figures) using 5 mainstream large multimodal models (LMMs). For each sample, we provide high-quality human ratings in terms of three aspects—scientific aesthetic (SA), topic relevance (TR), and attribute correctness (AC). Moreover, we present two trainable models: (1) HE4AFG-E, an automated Evaluation model for AFG, which generates aspect-aware training examples and then use them to train three aspect-specific evaluation modules via contrastive learning; (2) HE4AFG-R, an automated Refinement model, which generates and utilizes feedback on the quality of the figures (e.g., unfaithful elements) to continuously improve AFG. Extensive experiments on HE4AFG demonstrate the effectiveness and performance advantages of our models.

Abstract:
Existing vision-language models (VLMs) often suffer from visual hallucination, where the generated responses contain inaccuracies that are not grounded in the visual input. Efforts to address this issue without model finetuning primarily mitigate hallucination by contrastively reducing language biases or amplifying the weights of visual embedding during decoding. However, these approaches remain limited in their ability to capture fine-grained visual details. In this work, we propose the Perception Magnifier (PM), a novel visual decoding method that iteratively isolates relevant visual tokens based on attention and magnifies the corresponding regions, spurring the model to concentrate on fine-grained visual details during decoding. By magnifying critical regions while preserving the structural and contextual information at each decoding step, PM allows the VLM to enhance its scrutiny of the visual input, hence producing more accurate and faithful responses. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that PM not only achieves superior hallucination mitigation but also enhances language generation while preserving strong reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
Sparse Mixture of Experts (SMoE) architectures reduce computational cost by activating only a subset of experts per token, yet they often retain large memory footprints and exhibit significant redundancy, both within and across layers. We propose GMoE, a sparse MoE architecture designed to explicitly address these inefficiencies. Instead of maintaining separate expert sets for each layer, GMoE uses Global Experts shared across all layers and adds a Local Expert per layer for layer-specific adaptation. This architecture reuses Global Experts across layers, thereby mitigating inter-layer redundancy while substantially reducing model parameters. In addition, we introduce a Global Router with a GRU-based recurrent component shared across layers and layer-specific routing heads that propagate routing logits across layers. This routing mechanism couples routing decisions across layers, progressively refines routing paths, and helps mitigate intra-layer redundancy. Across diverse language modeling corpora and downstream benchmarks, GMoE remains competitive while using substantially fewer parameters. Routing path analyses and an ablation study show that GMoE reduces cross-layer routing concentration and increases path diversity, with the Global Experts, the Local Expert, and the Global Router all contributing to the gains. The code is available at https://github.com/GEONWOOHONG/GMoE.

Abstract:
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising direction by extending Large Language Models’ (LLMs) capabilities with external tools during reasoning. Existing TIR methods typically rely on external tool documentation during reasoning. However, this leads to tool mastery difficulty, tool size constraints, and inference inefficiency. To mitigate these issues, we explore Tool-Internalized Reasoning (TInR), aiming at facilitating reasoning with tool knowledge internalized into LLMs. Achieving this goal presents notable requirements, including tool internalization and tool-reasoning coordination. To address them, we propose TInR-U, a tool-internalized reasoning framework for unified reasoning and tool usage. TInR-U is trained through a three-phase pipeline: 1) tool internalization with a bidirectional knowledge alignment strategy; 2) supervised fine-tuning warm-up using high-quality reasoning annotations, and 3) reinforcement learning with TInR-specific rewards. We comprehensively evaluate our method across in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Experiment results show that TInR-U achieves superior performance in both settings, highlighting its effectiveness and efficiency. The codes are attached in the supplementary file for review.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as scalable judges for open-ended generation, yet how they form judgments remains insufficiently understood. Meanwhile, modern LLMs frequently produce answers accompanied by explicit reasoning, making reasoning chains a natural but understudied source of information for model-based evaluation. This work takes a first step toward understanding how exposing reasoning influences LLM-based judgment. Empirical results across factual question-answering (QA) and mathematical datasets show that the presence of reasoning substantially alters judgment behavior, with clear differences across judge capabilities. Weaker judges become more likely to accept incorrect answers when reasoning is present, suggesting over-reliance on persuasive explanations. In contrast, stronger judges exhibit more selective behavior and, in some cases, achieve higher judgment accuracy by leveraging reasoning content. Further analysis reveals that both reasoning fluency and factuality critically shape judgment outcomes. Together, these findings suggest that examining how models interpret reasoning is essential for understanding and improving LLM-based evaluation, with broader implications for the design of reliable automatic judges and evaluation protocols.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) embedded in agentic frameworks have transformed information retrieval from static, long-context question answering into open-ended exploration. Yet real-world use requires models to discover and synthesize “long-tail” facts from dispersed sources, a capability that remains under-evaluated. We introduce PolitNuggets, a multilingual benchmark for agentic information synthesis via constructing political biographies for 400 global elites, covering over 10000 political facts. We standardize evaluation with an optimized Supervisor–Searcher multi-agent system and propose FactNet, an evidence-conditional protocol that scores discovery, fine-grained accuracy, and efficiency. Across models and settings, we find that current systems often struggle with fine-grained details, and vary substantially in efficiency. Finally, using benchmark diagnostics, we relate agent performance to underlying model capabilities, highlighting the importance of short-context extraction, multilingual robustness, and reliable tool use.

Abstract:
While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for closed-ended tasks, extending it to open-ended social language games via self-play reveals a critical issue: evolution impasse. Due to the vast strategy space, language agents frequently converge to homogenized behaviors, leading to deterministic match outcomes that eliminate the gradient signals necessary for policy evolution. To tackle this issue, we propose Dual-scale Evolutionary Policy Training (DEPT) for social language games. DEPT introduces a time-scaled evolutionary perception mechanism that detects impasse by quantifying dual-scale value baseline divergence alongside match entropy. Upon perceiving the collapse, it then activates asymmetric advantage reshaping to dynamically modulate the optimization landscape for intervention. Thus, our method effectively restores gradient signals and enforces sustained strategic exploration. Extensive experiments on multiple social language games demonstrate that DEPT outperforms strong baselines, avoiding policy degeneration and driving the continuous evolution of social language agents.

Abstract:
Automatic legal judgment prediction (LJP) has recently received increasing attention in the natural language processing community because of its practical values in the real world. Significant progress has been achieved on LJP in the past decade. However, most existing LJP research primarily focuses on developing methods that achieve better performance on standard evaluation datasets, with limited emphasis on the long-term advancement of the field beyond improving evaluation metrics. In this position paper, we reflect on the state of the art in LJP research, and explore issues that should motivate researchers to think beyond merely enhancing performance metrics, with the ultimate goal of sparking discussions among LJP researchers about the future trajectory of the field.

Abstract:
Recent studies posit that Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) primarily amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities, but these insights are predominantly limited to language-only domains, leaving the dynamics of visual-centric spatial reasoning under-explored. To examine the impact of RLVR on the capability boundaries of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), we introduce Ariadne, a controlled framework based on synthetic maze navigation where the reasoning difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and the number of turns. We demonstrate that applying RLVR extends the spatial reasoning boundary, achieving success on problems where the base policy VLM consistently attains 0% accuracy despite increasing pass@k sampling budgets, indicating that the optimized policy successfully navigates search spaces that were effectively unreachable by the base distribution. Furthermore, despite being trained exclusively on synthetic mazes, we evaluate the model on two real-world navigation benchmarks (MapBench and ReasonMap) in a zero-shot setting. The observed improvements in these out-of-domain tasks suggest genuine spatial reasoning capability expansion rather than mere sampling efficiency. Our code is available at: https://github.com/MingheShen/Ariadne

Abstract:
Model merging dramatically reduces storage and computational resources by combining multiple expert models into a single multi-task model. However, existing methods struggle to maintain performance gains as the number of merged models increases. In this paper, we investigate the key obstacles that limit the scalability of model merging. We prove that the limited effective parameter space imposes a strict constraint on the number of models that can be successfully merged. Through Gaussian Width analysis, we show that marginal benefits diminish according to a strictly concave function as more models are merged. Using Approximate Kinematics Theory, we further prove the existence of a unique optimal threshold beyond which additional models yield negligible improvements. To address this limitation, we propose a straightforward Reparameterized Heavy-Tailed method to extend the merged model’s coverage and enhance performance. Empirical results on 19 benchmarks, including both knowledge-intensive and general-purpose tasks, validate our theoretical analysis. We believe that these results spark further research beyond the current scope of model merging.

Abstract:
Emotion plays a pivotal role in shaping negotiation outcomes, influencing trust, cooperation, and long-term relationships. Developing negotiation dialog systems that can recognize and respond strategically to emotions is therefore essential to create more effective human-centered interactions. Beyond generating emotionally appropriate responses, interpretability - understanding how a system generates a particular emotion-aware response, is critical for fostering reliability and building rapport. Driven by these aspects, in this work, we introduce PRISMA, an interpretable emotionally intelligent negotiation dialogue system targeting two application domains, viz. job interviews and resource allocation. To enable interpretability, we propose an Emotion-aware Negotiation Strategy-informed Chain-of-Thought (ENS-CoT) reasoning mechanism, which mimics human negotiation by perceiving, understanding, using, and managing emotions. Leveraging ENS-CoT, we curate two new datasets: JobNego (for job interview negotiation) and ResNego (for resource allocation negotiation). We then leverage these datasets to develop PRISMA by augmenting self-training with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), guiding agents toward more accurate, interpretable, and emotionally appropriate negotiation responses. Automatic and human evaluations on JobNego and ResNego datasets demonstrate that PRISMA substantially enhances the interpretability and generates appropriate emotion-aware responses, while improving overall negotiation effectiveness.

Abstract:
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm for text generation, offering parallel decoding and bidirectional context modeling. However, aligning dLLMs with reinforcement learning (RL) remains a significant challenge, as the marginal likelihood of sequences in masked diffusion is typically intractable, rendering standard policy gradient methods unstable or computationally prohibitive. In this work, we propose Diffusion-Gibbs Alignment (DGA), a novel variational framework that reformulates RL for dLLMs as a distribution matching problem. DGA bypasses the explicit computation of log-probabilities by leveraging a learned energy function to model the relative quality of samples. The optimization is decoupled into two stable steps: (1) contrastive energy ranking to capture global reward structures, and (2) weighted diffusion alignment to update the policy via importance sampling. Empirically, DGA establishes a new state-of-the-art across logical reasoning (Sudoku, Countdown), mathematical reasoning (GSM8K, Math500), and code generation (HumanEval, MBPP) benchmarks. DGA offers a novel variational perspective for dLLM alignment, achieving better performance while simultaneously enhancing training speed and memory efficiency.

Abstract:
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is a pivotal and complex task in multimodal understanding. Current CIR benchmarks typically feature limited query categories and fail to capture the diverse requirements of real-world scenarios. To bridge this evaluation gap, we leverage image editing to achieve precise control over modification types and content, enabling a pipeline for synthesizing queries across a broad spectrum of categories. Using this pipeline, we construct EDIR, a novel fine-grained CIR benchmark. EDIR encompasses 5,000 high-quality queries structured across five main categories and fifteen subcategories. Our comprehensive evaluation of 13 multimodal embedding models reveals a significant capability gap; even state-of-the-art models (e.g., RzenEmbed and GME) struggle to perform consistently across all subcategories, highlighting the rigorous nature of our benchmark. Through comparative analysis, we further uncover inherent limitations in existing benchmarks, such as modality biases and insufficient categorical coverage. Furthermore, an in-domain training experiment demonstrates the feasibility of our benchmark. This experiment clarifies the task challenges by distinguishing between categories that are solvable with targeted data and those that expose intrinsic limitations of current model architectures.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents that follow the sequential “reason-then-act” paradigm have achieved superior performance in many complex tasks. However, these methods suffer from limited exploration and incomplete environmental understanding, as they interact with only a single environment per step. In this paper, we first introduce a novel paradigm that enables an agent to interact with multiple environments simultaneously and share cross-trajectory experiences. Build upon this paradigm, we further propose Diverse Parallel Exploration Policy Optimization (DPEPO), a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that encourages the agent to perform diverse parallel exploration. There are two stages in DPEPO: initial supervised fine-tuning (SFT) imparts basic parallel reasoning and action generation, followed by reinforcement learning stage with a hierarchical reward scheme. We design a parallel trajectory-level success reward and two step-level rewards: Diverse Action Reward and Diverse State Transition Reward, which actively penalize behavioral redundancy and promote broad exploration. Extensive experiments on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld show that DPEPO achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) success rates, while maintaining comparable efficiency to strong sequential baselines.

Abstract:
Emotional Support Conversation requires not only affective expression but also grounded instrumental support to provide trustworthy guidance. However, existing ESC systems and benchmarks largely focus on affective support in text-only settings, overlooking how external tools can enable factual grounding and reduce hallucination in multi-turn emotional support. We introduce TEA-Bench, the first interactive benchmark for evaluating tool-augmented agents in ESC, featuring realistic emotional scenarios, an MCP-style tool environment, and process-level metrics that jointly assess the quality and factual grounding of emotional support. Experiments on nine LLMs show that tool augmentation generally improves emotional support quality and reduces hallucination, but the gains are strongly capacity-dependent: stronger models use tools more selectively and effectively, while weaker models benefit only marginally. We further release TEA-Dialog, a dataset of tool-enhanced ESC dialogues, and find that supervised fine-tuning improves in-distribution support but generalizes poorly. Our results underscore the importance of tool use in building reliable emotional support agents.

Abstract:
LLMs increasingly excel on AI benchmarks, but doing so does not guarantee validity for downstream tasks. This study contrasts LLM alignment on benchmarks, downstream tasks, and, importantly the intended impact of those tasks. We evaluate the performance of leading LLMs (i.e., generative pre-trained base models) on difficult-to-verify tasks of the teaching and learning of schoolchildren. Across all LLMs, inter-model behaviors on disparate tasks correlate higher than they do with expert human behaviors on target tasks. These biases shared across LLMs are poorly aligned with downstream measures of teaching quality and often negatively aligned with the intended impact of student learning outcomes. Further, we find multi-model ensembles, both unanimous model voting and expert-weighting by benchmark performance, further exacerbate misalignment with learning. We measure that selection of LLM and/or prompting strategy only reliably accounts for 15% of all measured misalignment error and that variation in misalignment error is shared across LLMs, suggesting that common pretraining accounts for much of the misalignment in these tasks. We demonstrate methods for robustly measuring alignment of complex tasks and provide unique insights into practical applications of LLMs in high-noise contexts.

Authors: Alejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou, Antoni-Joan Solergibert, Barna Pásztor, Bettina Messmer, Dhia Garbaya, Eduard Frank Ďurech, Ido Hakimi, Juan Garcia Giraldo, Mete Ismayilzada, Negar Foroutan, Skander Moalla, Tiancheng Chen, Vinko Sabolčec, Yixuan Xu, Michael Aerni, Badr AlKhamissi, Inés Altemir Marinas, Mohammad Hossein Amani, Matin Ansaripour, Ilia Badanin, Harold Benoit, Emanuela Boros, Nicholas John Browning, Fabian Bösch, Maximilian Böther, Niklas Canova, Camille Challier, Clément Charmillot, Jonathan Coles, Jan Milan Deriu, Arnout Devos, Lukas Drescher, Daniil Dzenhaliou, Maud Ehrmann, Dongyang Fan, Simin Fan, Silin Gao, Miguel Gila, María Grandury, Diba Hashemi, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Jiaming Jiang, Mark Klein, Andrei Kucharavy, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Frederike Lübeck, Roman Machacek, Theofilos Ioannis Manitaras, Andreas Marfurt, Kyle Matoba, Simon Matrenok, Henrique Mendonça, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Syrielle Montariol, Luca Mouchel, Sven Najem-Meyer, Jingwei Ni, Gennaro Oliva, Matteo Pagliardini, Elia Palme, Andrei Panferov, Léo Paoletti, Marco Passerini, Ivan Pavlov, Auguste Poiroux, Kaustubh Ponkshe, Nathan Ranchin, Javier Rando, Mathieu Sauser, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov, Marian Schneider, Stefano Schuppli, Marco Scialanga, Andrei Semenov, Kumar Shridhar, Raghav Singhal, Anna Sotnikova, Alexander Sternfeld, Ayush Kumar Tarun, Paul Teiletche, Jannis Vamvas, Xiaozhe Yao, Hao Zhao, Alexander Ilic, Ana Klimovic, Andreas Krause, Caglar Gulcehre, David Rosenthal, Elliott Ash, Florian Tramèr, Joost VandeVondele, Livio Veraldi, Martin Rajman, Thomas C. Schulthess, Torsten Hoefler, Antoine Bosselut, Martin Jaggi, Imanol Schlag

Abstract:
Open LLMs enable AI practitioners to control development costs by building on an existing foundation for downstream applications. While offering substantial promise, current models often fail to meet the needs of users needing open solutions aligned with responsible AI principles, including data compliance, transparency, and inclusivity. In this work, we present Apertus, a fully open suite of large language models (LLMs) designed to address responsibility shortcomings in today’s open model ecosystem, namely data responsibility and global representation. Unlike many prior models that release weights without reproducible data pipelines or regard for content-owner rights, Apertus models are pretrained exclusively on openly available data, retroactively respecting robots.txt exclusions and filtering for non-permissive, toxic, and personally identifiable content. To mitigate risks of data memorization, we also adopt the Goldfish objective during pretraining, strongly suppressing verbatim recall of data while retaining downstream task performance. Apertus also drastically expands multilingual coverage, training on 15T tokens from over approximately 1800 languages, with about 40% of pretraining data allocated to non-English content. Released at 8B and 70B scales, Apertus approaches state-of-the-art results among fully open models on multilingual benchmarks, rivaling or surpassing open-weight counterparts.

Abstract:
Persona-assigned Large Language Models can adopt diverse roles, enabling personalized and context-aware reasoning. However, even minor demographic perturbations in personas, such as simple pronoun swaps, can alter reasoning trajectories, leading to divergent sets of correct answers on reasoning benchmarks. We explore the potential of these variations as a constructive resource to improve LLM reasoning performance. We propose CHOIR (Collaborative Harmonization fOr Inference Robustness), a test-time framework that harmonizes a set of demographically perturbed, persona-conditioned reasoning signals into a unified prediction. CHOIR orchestrates a collaborative decoding process among counterfactual personas perturbed across dimensions of gender, race, religion, disability, and age, dynamically balancing agreement and divergence in their reasoning paths to improve performance. Experiments demonstrate that CHOIR consistently enhances LLM reasoning across model architectures, scales, and tasks. Improvements reach up to 20.1% for individual groups and 15.1% on average, and we show that CHOIR remains effective even when base personas are suboptimal.

Abstract:
Prior work evaluating emotion and affective understanding in large language models (LLMs) typically rely on predetermined label sets or focus on a singular evaluation task (e.g., emotion detection). We consider affective states, referring to the much broader variety of terms people use to label their emotional experiences. We evaluate multilingual language models’ understanding of affective states in English and Spanish through three different tasks: 1) _identification_, where models predict an affective state given text, 2) _expression_, where models generate text expressing a given affective state, and 3) _verification_, where models report whether a given term refers to an affective state. We show that performance on one task is not necessarily predictive of performance on another. Using these three tasks, we then begin to explore when and why models struggle to understand particular affective states compared to others. We examine systematic patterns in the affective state terms that are well and poorly understood by models, characterizing the working emotion vocabulary of LLMs.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) face critical privacy challenges due to the indiscriminate memorization of sensitive data. Existing unlearning methods, largely adapted from Euclidean paradigms, suffer from a geometric mismatch: they fail to disentangle specific instances from general concepts, causing catastrophic forgetting or unsafe substitution. We introduce LOTUS (Lorentz Transport for Unlearning Strategies), a framework for surgical semantic pruning within the Lorentz manifold. Leveraging hyperbolic geometry’s hierarchical nature, LOTUS employs an Inverted Entailment Cone Loss to sever the inheritance of sensitive concepts and a Lorentz Transport mechanism to align pruned features within the tangent space, ensuring compatibility with Euclidean backbones via a safety refusal prior. Experiments on MLLMU-Bench with LLaVA and Qwen show that LOTUS significantly outperforms baselines, effectively erasing targeted visual data while preserving general utility.

Abstract:
Multilingual benchmarks rarely test reasoning over culturally grounded premises: translated datasets keep English-centric scenarios, while culture-first datasets often lack control over the reasoning required. We propose Macaron, a template-first benchmark that factorizes reasoning type and cultural aspect across question languages. Using 100 language-agnostic templates that cover 7 reasoning types, 22 cultural aspects, native annotators create scenario-aligned English and local-language multiple-choice questions, and systematically derived True/False questions. Macaron contains 11,862 instances spanning 20 countries/cultural contexts, 10 scripts, and 20 languages and dialects (including low-resource ones like Amharic, Yoruba, Zulu, Kyrgyz, and some Arabic dialects). In zero-shot evaluation of 21 multilingual LLMs, reasoning-mode models achieve the strongest performance (80.8% overall) and near-parity between English and local languages (∆MC = −1.3%), while open-weight models degrade substantially in local languages (∆MC = −6.8%) and often approach chance on T/F tasks. Culture-grounded mathematical and counting templates are consistently the hardest. The data can be accessed here https://huggingface.co/datasets/AlaaAhmed2444/Macaron.

Abstract:
We introduce PR-XAI, a feature attribution method for transformer models based on the PageRank algorithm. The proposed PR-XAI models the attention mechanism as a directed graph, with weights derived from attention weights and their gradients. Evaluations across five well-known text classification datasets and three different architectures show that PR-AG, one variant of PR-XAI, outperforms state-of-the-art attribution methods in faithfulness and classification metrics, with significant gains on long-form text.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is crucial for the performance of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) but is often hindered by redundant and distracting segments, which incur excessive inference costs and degrade robustness. Existing approaches try to solve this problem by enforcing brevity through external supervision, such as length-based penalties or heuristic truncation. However, these approaches often degrade performance because they disregard the model’s intrinsic reasoning dependency and thus fail to distinguish between essential and redundant CoT segments. To address this problem, we propose SGP-CoT , a novel S elf- G uided P runing framework that leverages the model’s intrinsic likelihood landscape to identify segments that are extraneous to its specific reasoning pattern. Specifically, SGP-CoT treats the reasoning trajectory as a sequence of semantic units and assesses the necessity of each one via internal likelihood signals, measuring its contribution to the answer and local coherence. Based on this, it selectively removes non-essential segments and then forms high-quality pruning-based preference pairs, enabling the model to learn focused reasoning via self-optimization. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed SGP-CoT significantly reduces output length while maintaining or improving accuracy. These results validate that LRMs intrinsically possess the capability to discern reasoning utility, positioning SGP-CoT as a robust pathway toward scalable inference.

Abstract:
Memory is a critical component in large language model (LLM)-based agents, enabling them to store and retrieve past executions to improve task performance over time. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on how memory management choices impact the LLM agents’ behavior, especially their long-term performance. Specifically, we focus on two fundamental memory management operations that are widely used by many agent frameworks—memory addition and deletion—to systematically study their impact on the agent behavior. Through our quantitative analysis, we find that LLM agents display an experience-following property: high similarity between a task input and the input in a retrieved memory record often results in highly similar agent outputs. Our analysis further reveals two significant challenges associated with this property: error propagation, where inaccuracies in past experiences compound and degrade future performance, and misaligned experience replay, where some seemingly correct executions can provide limited or even misleading value as experiences. Through controlled experiments, we demonstrate the importance of regulating experience quality within the memory bank and show that future task evaluations can serve as free quality labels for stored memory. Our findings offer insights into the behavioral dynamics of LLM agent memory systems and provide practical guidance for designing memory components that support robust, long-term agent performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLM) have emerged as a promising avenue for time series forecasting, offering the potential to integrate multimodal data. However, existing LLM-based approaches face notable limitations—such as marginalized role in model architectures, reliance on coarse statistical text prompts, and lack of interpretability. In this work, we introduce Augur, a fully LLM driven time series forecasting framework that exploits LLM causal reasoning to discover and use directed causal associations among covariates. Augur uses a two stage teacher student architecture where a powerful teacher LLM infers a directed causal graph from time series using heuristic search together with pairwise causality testing. A lightweight student agent then refines the graph and fine tune on high confidence causal associations that are encoded as rich textual prompts to perform forecasting. This design improves predictive accuracy while yielding transparent, traceable reasoning about variable interactions. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets with 25 baselines demonstrate that Augur achieves competitive performance and robust zero-shot generalization.

Abstract:
Multimodal embedding models, built upon causal Vision Language Models (VLMs), have shown promise in various tasks. However, current approaches face three limitations: causal attention in VLM backbones is suboptimal for embedding tasks; scalability issues due to reliance on high-quality labeled paired data for contrastive learning; and limited diversity in training objectives and data. To address these issues, we propose MoCa, a two-stage framework for transforming pre-trained VLMs into bidirectional multimodal embedding models. The first stage, Modality-aware Continual Pre-training, introduces a joint reconstruction objective that simultaneously denoises interleaved texts and images, enhancing bidirectional context-aware reasoning. The second stage, Heterogeneous Contrastive Fine-tuning, leverages diverse, semantically rich multimodal data beyond simple image-caption pairs to enhance generalization and alignment. Our method addresses the stated limitations by introducing bidirectional attention through continual pre-training, scaling effectively with massive unlabeled datasets via joint reconstruction objectives, and utilizing diverse multimodal data for enhanced representation robustness. Experiments demonstrate that MoCa consistently improves performance across MMEB and ViDoRe-v2 benchmarks, achieving new state-of-the-arts, and exhibits strong scalability with both model size and training data on MMEB.We have released the model weights and data on our project page https://haon-chen.github.io/MoCa/.

Abstract:
Natural Language Inference (NLI) models have been used in various ways to improve the factuality of LLM outputs. This is typically done by applying an NLI model to judge whether the model output is entailed from the supposed evidence, triggering some corrective actions, such as beam reranking at inference time or RL rewards during training. While NLI models are trained to detect factual inconsistencies over complete sentences, decisions in the common autoregressive generation architecture are made for each evolving text prefix, during decoding. Addressing this setting, we generalize the entailment detection task to apply over arbitrary text prefixes, and suggest its utility for improving generation faithfulness. Providing suitable evaluation and training datasets for this task, we train MiniTruePrefixes, a novel specialized model that better detects factual inconsistencies over text prefixes, outperforming comparable baseline NLI models by 5-14 F1 points in prefix-level entailment. We further demonstrate that integrating MiniTruePrefixes into a controlled decoding framework substantially improves factual consistency in abstractive summarization. When guided by MiniTruePrefixes, LLaMA-3.2-3B-Instruct matches the faithfulness and runtime of the 8B model from the same model family, while using only half the memory.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce inconsistent answers when faced with different phrasings of the same prompt. In this paper, we propose Flip-Flop Consistency (F 2 C), an unsupervised training method that improves robustness to such perturbations. F 2 C is composed of two key components. The first, Consensus Cross-Entropy (CCE), uses a majority vote across prompt variations to create a hard pseudo-label. The second is a representation alignment loss that pulls lower-confidence and non-majority predictors toward the consensus established by high-confidence, majority-voting variations. We evaluate our method on 11 datasets spanning four NLP tasks, with 4–15 prompt variations per dataset. On average, F 2 C raises observed agreement by 11.62%, improves mean F 1 by 8.94%, and reduces performance variance across formats by 3.29%. In out-of-domain evaluations, F 2 C generalizes effectively, increasing ̅F 1 and agreement while decreasing variance across most source-target pairs. Finally, when trained on only a subset of prompt perturbations and evaluated on held-out formats, F 2 C consistently improves both performance and agreement while reducing variance. These findings highlight F 2 C as an effective unsupervised method for enhancing LLM consistency, performance, and generalization under prompt perturbations.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great performance on complex reasoning tasks but often require generating long intermediate thoughts before reaching a final answer. During generation, LLMs rely on a key-value (KV) cache for autoregressive decoding. However, the memory footprint of the KV cache grows with output length. Prior work on KV cache optimization mostly focus on compressing the long input context, while retaining the full KV cache for decoding. For tasks requiring long output generation, this leads to increased computational and memory costs. In this paper, we introduce ZoomR, a novel approach that enables LLMs to adaptively compress verbose reasoning thoughts into summaries and uses a dynamic KV cache selection policy that leverages these summaries while also strategically "zooming in" on fine-grained details. By using summary keys as a coarse-grained index during decoding, ZoomR uses the query to retrieve details for only the most important thoughts. This hierarchical strategy significantly reduces memory usage by avoiding full-cache attention at each step. Experiments across math and reasoning tasks show that our approach achieves competitive performance compared to baselines, while reducing inference memory requirements by more than 4 × . These results demonstrate that a multi-granularity KV selection enables more memory efficient decoding, especially for long output generation.

Abstract:
While reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been proven highly effective for enhancing reasoning, its application to medical visual question answering (Med-VQA) is hampered by models producing reasoning inconsistent with either the visual evidence or the final answer. Our analysis reveals a critical flaw in RLVR training: it paradoxically encourages models to disregard visual evidence and generate answers that contradict their own reasoning. This degradation is most pronounced in specialized medical modalities (e.g., Fundus, Ultrasound) where base VLMs lack robust understanding, a failure we attribute to a flawed reward mechanism exacerbated by the scarcity of diverse training data. To tackle this, we introduce Med-Zero-17K , a large-scale dataset spanning over 30 modalities and 24 clinically relevant tasks, and the Multi-Consistency Reward (MCR) framework, which explicitly rewards both perceptual grounding and logical coherence. Extensive experiments validate our approach: integrating MCR into the RLVR framework delivers robust performance gains. This success stems from our crucial finding that rewarding internal consistency is significantly more effective than attempting to judge reasoning correctness. Furthermore, MCR proves highly versatile, exhibiting strong generalization across diverse VLM backbones, compatibility with RL algorithms like GRPO and DPO, and extending its effectiveness to 3D VQA tasks and R1-style training paradigms. Code and dataset will be released.

Abstract:
Effective poster design requires rapidly capturing attention and clearly conveying messages. Inspired by the “contrast effects” principle, we propose ReContraster, the first training-free model to leverage regional contrast to make posters stand out. By emulating the cognitive behaviors of a poster designer, ReContraster introduces the compositional multi-agent system to identify elements, organize layout, and evaluate generated poster candidates. To further ensure harmonious transitions across region boundaries, ReContraster integrates the hybrid denoising strategy during the diffusion process. We additionally contribute a new benchmark dataset for comprehensive evaluation. Seven quantitative metrics and four user studies confirm its superiority over relevant state-of-the-art methods, producing visually striking and aesthetically appealing posters.

Abstract:
In cross-cultural recipe adaptation, the goal is not only to ensure cultural appropriateness and retain the original dish’s essence, but also to provide diverse options for various dietary needs and preferences. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising approach, combining the retrieval of real recipes from the target cuisine for cultural adaptability with large language models (LLMs) for relevance. However, it remains unclear whether RAG can generate diverse adaptation results. Our analysis shows that RAG tends to overly rely on a limited portion of the context across generations, failing to produce diverse outputs even when provided with varied contextual inputs. This reveals a key limitation of RAG in creative tasks with multiple valid answers: it fails to leverage contextual diversity for generating varied responses. To address this issue, we propose CARRIAGE, A plug-and-play RAG framework for cross-cultural recipe adaptation that enhances diversity in both retrieval and context organization. To our knowledge, this is the first RAG framework that explicitly aims to generate highly diverse outputs to accommodate multiple user preferences. Our experiments show that CARRIAGE achieves Pareto efficiency in terms of diversity and quality of recipe adaptation compared to closed-book LLMs.

Abstract:
Defending large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks is essential for their safe and reliable deployment. Existing defenses often rely on shallow pattern matching, which struggles to generalize to novel and unseen attack strategies. To address this challenge, we propose the Cognitive-Driven Defense (CDD) framework, which targets the underlying structure of jailbreak prompts by applying meta-operations, defined as basic manipulations that conceal harmful intent. CDD emulates human cognitive reasoning through a structured reasoning chain. It begins with a global perception of the prompt and follows with a localized analysis to uncover hidden manipulations. By applying supervised fine-tuning on this structured chain, the model learns to identify and reason about known manipulation patterns. To enhance generalization to unseen threats, an entropy-guided reinforcement learning algorithm (EG-GRPO) is introduced to encourage exploration of new types and variants of meta-operations. Experiments demonstrate that CDD can achieve state-of-the-art defense performance and exhibit strong generalization to unseen jailbreak attacks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit cultural bias from over-represented viewpoints in training data, yet cultural alignment remains a challenge due to limited cultural knowledge and a lack of exploration into effective learning approaches. We introduce a cost-efficient and cognitively grounded method: fine-tuning LLMs on native speakers’ word-association norms, leveraging cognitive psychology findings that such associations capture cultural knowledge. Using word association datasets from native speakers in the US (English) and China (Mandarin), we train Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B via supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization. We evaluate models’ cultural alignment through a two-tier evaluation framework that spans low-level lexical associations and high-level cultural value alignment using the World Values Survey. Results show significant improvements in lexical alignment (16–20% English, 43–165% Mandarin on Precision@5) and high-level cultural value shifts. On a subset of 50 questions where US and Chinese respondents diverge most, fine-tuned Qwen nearly doubles its response alignment with Chinese values (13 to 25). Remarkably, our trained 7–8B models match or exceed vanilla 70B baselines, demonstrating that a few million of culture-grounded associations achieve value alignment without expensive retraining. Our work highlights both the promise and the need for future research grounded in human cognition in improving cultural alignment in AI models.

Abstract:
Pretraining massively multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) for many languages at once is challenging due to limited model capacity, scarce high-quality data, and compute constraints. Moreover, the lack of language coverage in the tokenizer makes it harder to address the gap for new languages purely at the post-training stage. In this work, we study what relatively cheap interventions early on in training improve language plasticity, or adaptation capabilities of the model post-training to new languages. We focus on tokenizer design and propose using a universal tokenizer that is trained for more languages than the primary pretraining languages to enable efficient adaptation in expanding language coverage after pretraining. Our systematic experiments across diverse groups of languages and different training strategies show that a universal tokenizer enables significantly higher language adaptation, with up to 20.2% increase in win rates compared to tokenizers specific to pretraining languages. Furthermore, a universal tokenizer also leads to better plasticity towards languages that are completely unseen in the tokenizer and pretraining, by up to 5% win rate gain. We achieve this adaptation to an expanded set of languages with minimal compromise in performance on the majority of languages included in pretraining.

Abstract:
Cross-lingual topic modeling aims to discover shared semantic structures across languages, yet existing models depend on sparse bilingual resources and often yield incoherent or weakly aligned topics. Recent LLM-based refinements improve interpretability but are costly, document-level, and prone to hallucination, with prior white-box approaches requiring inaccessible token probabilities. We propose LLM-XTM, a framework that integrates LLM-guided topic refinement with self-consistency uncertainty quantification, enabling black-box, stable, and scalable enhancement of cross-lingual topic models. Experiments on multilingual corpora show that LLM-XTM achieves superior topic coherence and alignment while reducing reliance on bilingual dictionaries and expensive LLM calls.

Abstract:
Document understanding is critical for applications from financial analysis to scientific discovery. Current approaches, whether OCR-based pipelines feeding Large Language Models (LLMs) or native Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), face key limitations: the former loses structural detail, while the latter struggles with context modeling. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) helps ground models in external data, but documents’ multimodal nature, i.e., combining text, tables, charts, and layout, demands a more advanced paradigm: Multimodal RAG. This approach enables holistic retrieval and reasoning across all modalities, unlocking comprehensive document intelligence. Recognizing its importance, this paper presents a systematic survey of Multimodal RAG for document understanding. We propose a taxonomy based on domain, retrieval modality, and granularity, and review advances involving graph structures and agentic frameworks. We also summarize key datasets, benchmarks, and applications, and highlight open challenges in efficiency, fine-grained representation, and robustness, providing a roadmap for future progress in document AI.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has markedly enhanced the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). Its success, however, largely depends on strong base models with rich world knowledge, yielding only modest improvements for small-size language models (SLMs). To address this limitation, we investigate Guided GRPO, which injects ground-truth reasoning steps into roll-out trajectories to compensate for SLMs’ inherent weaknesses. Through a comprehensive study of various guidance configurations, we find that naively adding guidance delivers limited gains. These insights motivate G 2 RPO-A, an adaptive algorithm that automatically adjusts guidance strength in response to the model’s evolving training dynamics. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code-generation benchmarks confirm that G 2 RPO-A substantially outperforms vanilla GRPO. Our code and models at available at https://github.com/T-Lab-CUHKSZ/G2RPO-A.

Abstract:
Traditional tabular data synthesis methods often overlook the cross-modal heterogeneity of real-world tables, where structured continuous and discrete attributes coexist with unstructured long-text columns. Existing synthesis approaches struggle to simultaneously achieve accurate statistical fidelity for non-textual attributes and consistent semantic constraints between textual and non-textual attributes. In this work, we establish the first benchmark for long-text tabular data synthesis and introduce a novel metric, termed Textual Column Correlation Fidelity (TCCF), to quantify cross-modal semantic alignment. We propose AFT-Tab, an adversarial fine-tuning framework that synergistically trains an LLM-based text generator and a deep-learning-based non-textual generator. Through a dual-feedback mechanism guided by an LLM discriminator, AFT-Tab ensures both precise statistical distributions and rigorous semantic constraints. Experimental results show that AFT-Tab significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in statistical fidelity, TCCF, diversity, and downstream task utility.

Abstract:
Recent search-augmented LLMs trained with reinforcement learning (RL) can interleave searching and reasoning for multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, they face two critical failure modes as the accumulating context becomes flooded with both crucial evidence and irrelevant information: (1) ineffective search chain construction that produces incorrect queries or omits retrieval of critical information, and (2) reasoning hijacking by peripheral evidence that causes models to misidentify distractors as valid evidence.To address these challenges, we propose D²Plan, a Dual-agent Dynamic global Planning paradigm for complex retrieval-augmented reasoning. D²Plan operates through the collaboration of a Reasoner and a Purifier: the Reasoner constructs explicit global plans during reasoning and dynamically adapts them based on retrieval feedback; the Purifier assesses retrieval relevance and condenses key information for the Reasoner.We further introduce a two-stage training framework consisting of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) cold-start on synthesized trajectories and RL with plan-oriented rewards to teach LLMs to master the D²Plan paradigm. Extensive experiments demonstrate that D²Plan enables more coherent multi-step reasoning and stronger resilience to irrelevant information, thereby achieving superior performance on challenging QA benchmarks.

Abstract:
Debt collection is a critical negotiation task in the financial industry, with strong practical relevance and exceptional academic value as a behaviorally rich, high-stakes testbed for human-centered dialogue systems. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in dialogue and negotiation, effectively evaluating their performance in this complex scenarios remains a major challenge: existing benchmarks uniformly assume users to be static, rational agents with fixed preferences, failing to capture the rich behavioral heterogeneity inherent in real-world debt collection. To bridge this gap, we propose DebtBench, the first public persona-enriched debt collection benchmark, that highlights behavioral heterogeneity in negotiation. Moreover, we develop DebtGPT, a debt collection agent trained to jointly optimize financial recovery and interaction experience. Our experimental results, using 16 state-of-the-art LLMs, find that most existing models struggle in this complex but realistic scenarios, whereas DebtGPT outperforms all open-source baselines and achieves performance on par with GPT-4o. The code and data are available at https://github.com/yyuhhhh13/DebtNegotiation.

Abstract:
Strategic planning is critical for multi-step reasoning, yet compact Language Language Models (LLMs) often lack the capacity to formulate global strategies, leading to error propagation in long-horizon tasks. Our analysis reveals that LLMs possess latent reasoning capabilities that can be unlocked when conditioned on explicit plans from a teacher model; however, runtime reliance on external guidance is often impractical due to latency and availability constraints. To bridge this gap, we propose PILOT ( P lanning via I nternalized L atent O ptimization T rajectories), a non-invasive framework designed to internalize the strategic oversight of large models into intrinsic Latent Guidance . Instead of altering backbone weights, PILOT employs a lightweight Hyper-Network to synthesize a query-conditioned Latent Guidance . This vector acts as an internal steering mechanism, guiding the model’s representations toward optimal reasoning paths. Extensive experiments on mathematical and coding benchmarks demonstrate that PILOT effectively stabilizes reasoning trajectories, consistently outperforming strong baselines (e.g., +8.9% on MATH500) with negligible inference latency. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PILOT-B266

Abstract:
Diffusion models (DMs) have recently exhibited impressive generation capability. However, their training generally requires huge computational resources and large-scale datasets. To solve these, recent studies empower DMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), yielding retrieval-augmented diffusion models (RDMs) that enhance performance with reduced parameters. Despite the success, RAG may introduce novel security issues that warrant further investigation. In this paper, we propose BadRDM, the first poisoning framework targeting RDMs, to systematically investigate their vulnerability to backdoor attacks. Our framework fully considers RAG’s characteristics by manipulating the retrieved items for specific text triggers to ultimately control the generated outputs. Specifically, we first insert a tiny portion of images into the retrieval database as target toxicity surrogates. We then exploit the contrastive learning mechanism underlying retrieval models by designing a malicious variant that establishes robust shortcuts from triggers to toxicity surrogates. In addition, we introduce novel entropy-based selection and generative augmentation strategies for better toxicity surrogates. Extensive experiments on two mainstream tasks show that the proposed method achieves outstanding attack effects while preserving benign utility. Notably, BadRDM remains effective even under common defense strategies, further highlighting serious security concerns for RDMs.

Abstract:
Existing cultural commonsense benchmarks treat nations as monolithic, assuming uniform practices within national boundaries. But does cultural commonsense hold uniformly within a nation, or does it vary at the sub-national level? We introduce Indica, the first benchmark designed to test LLMs’ ability to address this question, focusing on India—a nation of 28 states, 8 union territories, and 22 official languages. We collect human-annotated answers from five Indian regions (North, South, East, West, and Central) across 515 questions spanning 8 domains of everyday life, yielding 1,630 region-specific question-answer pairs. Strikingly, only 39.4% of questions elicit agreement across all five regions, demonstrating that cultural commonsense in India is predominantly regional, not national. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs and find two critical gaps: models achieve only 13.4%–20.9% accuracy on region-specific questions, and they exhibit geographic bias, over-selecting Central and North India as the "default" (selected 30-40% more often than expected) while under-representing East and West. Beyond India, our methodology provides a generalizable framework for evaluating cultural commonsense in any culturally heterogeneous nation, from question design grounded in anthropological taxonomy, to regional data collection, to bias measurement.

Abstract:
Hallucinations arise when large language models (LLMs) guess rather than acknowledge their underlying uncertainty. Existing static strategies for mitigating hallucinations have been only partially successful, largely because they do not explicitly model the information gain from interacting with the external environment. Researchers need a general method to proactively steer users toward informative clarifications, thereby unlocking the model’s effective capacity under underspecified inputs. We model the uncertainty of LLMs in interactive settings and uncover the mechanism of active calibration between model concepts and human evaluations, improving reliability. We show that calibration error in LLMs density estimation admits a non-vanishing lower bound under non-interactive learning, while interaction empirically reduces it. We further characterize that calibration error identifies informative queries and that calibration can be accelerated by shifting query distributions from imbalanced to balanced regimes. Guided by these insights, we propose a calibration-driven Interactive Learning Strategy (ILS) that selects clarification queries by optimizing calibration error, providing both theoretical guarantees and empirical gains for reliability. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zhouyeah215/Demystifying_Uncertainty.

Abstract:
Ensuring the safety of LLM-generated content is essential for real-world deployment. Most existing guardrail models formulate moderation as a fixed binary classification task, implicitly assuming a fixed definition of harmfulness. In practice, enforcement strictness—how conservatively harmfulness is defined and enforced—varies across platforms and evolves over time, making binary moderators brittle under shifting requirements. In this paper, we introduce FlexBench, a strictness-adaptive LLM moderation benchmark that enables controlled evaluation under multiple strictness regimes. Experiments on FlexBench reveal substantial cross-strictness inconsistency in existing moderators: models that perform well under one regime can degrade substantially under others, limiting their practical usability. To address this, we propose FlexGuard, an LLM-based moderator that outputs a calibrated continuous risk score reflecting risk severity and supports strictness-specific decisions via thresholding. We train FlexGuard via risk-alignment optimization to improve score–severity consistency and provide practical threshold selection strategies to adapt to target strictness at deployment. Experiments on FlexBench and public benchmarks demonstrate that FlexGuard achieves higher moderation accuracy and substantially improved robustness under varying strictness.

Abstract:
Stance detection aims to identify the attitude expressed in text towards a given target, with applications in public opinion analysis and misinformation mitigation. Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), two key challenges remain: (1) spurious correlations between superficial features and stance labels, and (2) lack of cognitive modeling that simulates the transition from intuitive perception to deliberate reasoning. To address these issues, we propose Cognitive-Driven Stance Detection (CDSD), inspired by Kahneman’s Dual-Process Theory. CDSD integrates fast intuitive judgment (System 1) and analytical reasoning (System 2), enhanced by three key modules: attention-based cognitive alignment to compare system focus, uncertainty-aware belief update using Bayesian inference, and self-doubt-triggered counterfactual reasoning for re-evaluation under low consistency or high uncertainty. Experimental results on SEM16, P-Stance, and VAST show that CDSD outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple LLMs. Notably, CDSD exhibits strong robustness against textual perturbations such as emotional word removal and rhetorical restructuring. By integrating cognitive theory with NLP, our work provides a promising path toward more reliable and interpretable stance detection systems.

Abstract:
Modern coding scaffolds turn LLMs into capable software agents, but their ability to follow scaffold-specified instructions remains under-examined, especially when constraints are heterogeneous and persist across interactions. To fill this gap, we introduce OctoBench, which benchmarks scaffold-aware instruction following in repository-grounded agentic coding. OctoBench includes 34 environments and 217 tasks instantiated under three scaffold types, and is paired with 7,098 objective checklist items. To disentangle solving the task from following the rules, we provide an automated observation-and-scoring toolkit that captures full trajectories and performs fine-grained checks. Experiments on eight representative models reveal a systematic gap between task-solving and scaffold-aware compliance, underscoring the need for training and evaluation that explicitly targets heterogeneous instruction following. We will release the benchmark to support reproducible benchmarking and to accelerate the development of more scaffold-aware coding agents.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) transition to autonomous agents synthesizing real-time information, their reasoning capabilities introduce an unexpected attack surface. This paper introduces a novel threat where colluding agents steer victim beliefs using only truthful evidence fragments distributed through public channels, without relying on covert communications, backdoors, or falsified documents. By exploiting LLMs’ overthinking tendency, we formalize the first cognitive collusion attack and propose Generative Montage: a Writer-Editor-Director framework that constructs deceptive narratives through adversarial debate and coordinated posting of evidence fragments, causing victims to internalize and propagate fabricated conclusions. To study this risk, we develop CoPHEME, a dataset derived from real-world rumor events, and simulate attacks across diverse LLM families. Our results show pervasive vulnerability across 14 LLM families: attack success rates reach 74.4% for proprietary models and 70.6% for open-weights models. Counterintuitively, stronger reasoning capabilities increase susceptibility, with reasoning-specialized models showing higher attack success than base models or prompts. Furthermore, these false beliefs then cascade to downstream judges, achieving over 60% deception rates, highlighting a socio-technical vulnerability in how LLM-based agents interact with dynamic information environments.

Abstract:
It is crucial to understand a specific domain by events. Extensive event extraction research has been conducted in many domains such as news, finance, and biology. However, event extraction in scientific domain is still insufficiently supported by comprehensive datasets and tailored methods. Compared with other domains, scientific domain has two characteristics: (1) denser nuggets and events, and (2) more complex information forms. To solve the above problem, considering these two characteristics, we first construct SciEvents, a large-scale multi-event document-level dataset with a schema tailored for scientific domain. It consists of 2,508 documents and 24,381 events under multi-stage manual annotation and quality control. Then, we propose EXCEEDS, an end-to-end scientific event extraction framework by encoding dense nuggets into a grid matrix and simplifying complex event extraction as a nugget-based grid modeling task. Experiments on SciEvents demonstrate state-of-the-art performances of EXCEEDS. Both the SciEvents dataset and the EXCEEDS framework are released publicly to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
User simulation is increasingly vital to develop and evaluate recommender systems (RSs). While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising avenues to simulate user behavior, they often struggle with the absence of specific task alignment required for RSs and the efficiency demands of large-scale simulation. A vast yet underutilized resource for enhancing this alignment is the extensive user feedback inherent in RSs, but leveraging it is challenging due to its ambiguity, noise and massive volume, which hinders efficient preference alignment. To overcome these hurdles, we introduce a novel data construction framework that leverages user feedback in RSs with advanced LLM capabilities to generate high-quality simulation data. Our framework unfolds in two key phases: (1) using LLMs to generate decision-making processes as explanatory rationales on simulation samples, thereby reducing ambiguity; and (2) data distillation based on uncertainty estimation and behavior sampling to efficiently filter the most informative, denoised samples. Accordingly, we fine-tune lightweight LLMs, as user simulators, using such high-quality dataset with corresponding decision-making processes. Extensive experiments confirm that our framework significantly boosts the alignment with human preferences and the in-domain reasoning capabilities of the fine-tuned LLMs, providing more insightful and interpretable signals for RS interaction. We believe our work, together with publicly available developed framework, high-quality mixed-domain dataset, and fine-tuned LLM checkpoints, will advance the RS community and offer valuable insights for broader human-centric AI research. Our code is available at https://github.com/Joinn99/UserMirrorer.

Abstract:
With the rise of the Agent Web and Model Context Protocol (MCP), the agent ecosystem is evolving into an open collaborative network, exponentially increasing accessible tools. However, current architectures face severe scalability and generality bottlenecks. To address this, we propose ACE-Router, a pipeline for training history-aware routers to empower precise navigation in large-scale ecosystems. By leveraging a dependency-rich candidate Graph to synthesize multi-turn trajectories, we effectively train routers with dynamic context understanding to create the plug-and-play Light Routing Agent. Experiments on the real-world benchmarks MCP-Universe and MCP-Mark demonstrate superior performance. Notably, ACE-Router exhibits critical properties for the future Agent Web: it not only generalizes to multi-agent collaboration with minimal adaptation but also maintains exceptional robustness against noise and scales effectively to massive candidate spaces. These findings provide a strong empirical foundation for universal orchestration in open-ended ecosystems.Our code is available at https://github.com/euyis1019/ACE-Router.

Abstract:
Natural language data is inherently noisy, yet standard interpretable models often rely on scalar similarities that obscure the true evidentiary basis of a prediction. This limitation is particularly detrimental to prototype-based classification, where traditional full-alignment mechanisms force non-informative background segments to match informative prototypes, yielding unstable or misleading explanations. To mitigate this, we present SCOUT, a novel paradigm that grounds prototype reasoning in the selective correspondence of discriminative fragments. Concretely, we represent each document as a discrete distribution over span embeddings and employ differentiable Unbalanced Optimal Transport (UOT) to align them with class-specific prototypes. Unlike standard methods, this mechanism enables the model to focus strictly on decisive evidence while leaving irrelevant noise unmatched via geometric mass suppression. To ensure verifiability, we anchor prototype supports to readable training spans, establishing a transparent bridge between input segments and stored knowledge. Comprehensive experiments on seven benchmarks demonstrate that SCOUT yields prototypes focused on semantically significant spans, significantly outperforming traditional rationale extraction and post-hoc attribution methods in terms of faithfulness and stability.

Abstract:
Even when factually correct, social-media news previews (image-headline pairs) can induce interpretation drift: by selectively omitting crucial context, they lead readers to form judgments that diverge from what the full article supports. This covert harm is subtler than explicit misinformation, yet remains underexplored. To address this gap, we develop a multi-stage pipeline that simulates preview-based and context-based understanding, enabling construction of the MM-Misleading benchmark. Using MM-Misleading, we systematically evaluate open-source LVLMs and uncover pronounced blind spots in omission-based misleadingness detection. We further propose OMGuard, which combines (1) Interpretation-Aware Fine-Tuning for misleadingness detection and (2) Rationale-Guided Misleading Content Correction, where explicit rationales guide headline rewriting to reduce misleading impressions. Experiments show that OMGuard lifts an 8B model’s detection accuracy to the level of a 235B LVLM while delivering markedly stronger end-to-end correction. Further analysis shows that misleadingness usually arises from local narrative shifts, such as missing background, instead of global frame changes, and identifies image-driven cases where text-only correction fails, underscoring the need for visual interventions.

Abstract:
In many real-world applications, such as medical insurance, many regulations exist that define how data should comply with certain standards. Auditors typically use these regulations to identify anomalies in tabular data. However, existing tabular anomaly detection methods often focus on detecting anomalies based on data distribution without considering regulatory compliance. In this paper, we introduce a new task, Regulation-guided Tabular Anomaly Detection, which leverages regulations to detect anomalies in tabular data. We also developed three new datasets for this task. To address this task, we present RegValidator, a training-free method that integrates data validation with large language models (LLMs) for detecting anomalies. In this process, the LLMs generate ideas for anomaly detection from a regulation perspective, while the data validation validates these ideas from a data distribution perspective. This process can be framed as a Budgeted Maximum Coverage problem, which can be solved by a constant-factor approximation algorithm with provable guarantees. Empirical results on the new datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms existing baselines. A field experiment in a commercial health insurance company also reveals the practical value of our method. Our code is available at https://github.com/hnu-vis/RegValidator.

Abstract:
Idiom translation remains a formidable challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), as the constraints of static parametric memory and the noise in sentence-level retrieval often lead to literal misinterpretations. To address this, we propose DeReA, a detect-retrieve-arbitrate framework. The system employs a preference-aligned detector to identify idiomatic spans by reasoning over semantic conflicts between literal and contextual meanings. Subsequently, an idiom-centric translator invokes a fine-tuned embedding model to efficiently retrieve canonical definitions from an external knowledge base. The translator then utilizes a dual-path arbitration mechanism to select the optimal rendering by weighing the retrieval-augmented translations against direct translation. To evaluate our framework, we introduce LoMI, a high-difficulty benchmark with low data contamination. Experimental results demonstrate that DeReA significantly enhances performance across various model scales, improving GPT-5-mini by over 5.2 points in both idiomatic quality and consistency according to LLM-based metrics. Furthermore, evaluations on an emerging slang dataset from Urban Dictionary validate the potential of our approach in handling novel and evolving linguistic data. Our code is available at https://github.com/jrongqing/DeReA.

Abstract:
The increasing reliance on data-driven research underscores the need for accessible datasets, particularly in the medical domain. However, raw datasets are frequently unavailable due to privacy constraints and ethical considerations, which complicates reproducibility, meta-analyses, and large-scale data-driven research. Text2Tabular addresses this challenge by reconstructing research datasets from scientific publications using advanced natural language processing and statistical modeling. Our key contributions include: (1) a unified framework combining Large Language Model driven information extraction with copula-based distribution modeling, (2) novel integration of statistical test results as distribution constraints through constrained Markov Chain Monte Carlo refinement, and (3) an own comprehensive benchmark comprising real scientific publications with corresponding raw datasets for evaluating our literature-based data reconstruction. Evaluation on both benchmark datasets and our curated collection demonstrates strong performance in Train-on-Synthetic-Test-on-Real (TSTR) evaluations, alongside accurate replication of descriptive statistics showing that Text2Tabular preserves the statistical properties and multivariate relationships of the original datasets. Text2Tabular facilitates scientific progress by enabling immediate access to realistic, domain-specific synthetic data, thus, improving data accessibility, and mitigating data scarcity in fields with limited real-world data.

Abstract:
Despite recent progress in LLMs for text style transfer, most existing methods rely on costly task-specific training and offer limited control over separating stylistic modification from content preservation. We propose Diff4TST, a diffusion-based language model that formulates text style transfer as an explicit copy-and-edit process. Built upon masked diffusion language models, Diff4TST introduces a style-aware noise schedule that selectively perturbs stylistic tokens while preserving content-bearing tokens during supervised fine-tuning.At inference time, we further introduce a generate-then-refine strategy that iteratively improves style compliance via gradient-based token re-masking, without reinforcement learning or external reward models. Extensive experiments on both fine-grained and polarity-based benchmarks show that Diff4TST achieves substantially improved style accuracy and controllability while maintaining strong content preservation and fluency. These results suggest diffusion-based language models as a principled and effective alternative to autoregressive pipelines for text style transfer.

Abstract:
Multimodal Sarcasm Understanding (MSU) comprises multiple subtasks, demanding both incongruity perception and intent reasoning. However, this progress is impeded by two bottlenecks. First, the lack of a unified benchmark for holistic satirical cognition hinders comprehensive evaluation of MSU. Second, jointly modeling these heterogeneous subtasks often leads to feature entanglement. Specifically, while subtasks share a dependence on incongruity, they diverge in granular focus, causing specific execution patterns to erode the fundamental perception capability. To address these challenges, we make two contributions. First, we introduce DocMSU-PLUS, a comprehensive benchmark covering five cognitive dimensions of MSU. All tasks are reformulated into multiple-choice questions (MCQs), enabling a unified accuracy-based evaluation. Second, we propose the Dual Orthogonal Stream Experts (DOSE) framework. DOSE structurally decouples experts into orthogonal shared perception and private execution streams to physically block gradient interference between tasks. Experiments demonstrate that DOSE achieves superior performance on DocMSU-PLUS, effectively balancing general perception with task-specific adaptation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in simulating human-like social behaviors. Social graphs provide high-quality supervision signals that encode both local interactions and global network structure, yet they remain underutilized for LLM training. To address this gap, we propose Graphia, the first general LLM-based social graph simulation framework that leverages graph data as supervision for LLM post-training via reinforcement learning. With GNN-based structural rewards, Graphia trains specialized agents to predict whom to interact with (destination selection) and how to interact (edge generation), followed by designed graph generation pipelines. We evaluate Graphia under two settings: Transductive Dynamic Graph Generation (TDGG), a micro-level task with our proposed node-wise interaction alignment metrics; and Inductive Dynamic Graph Generation (IDGG), a macro-level task with our proposed metrics for aligning emergent network properties. On three real-world networks, Graphia improves micro-level alignment by 6.1% in the composite destination selection score, 12% in edge classification accuracy, and 27.9% in edge content BERTScore over the strongest baseline. For macro-level alignment, it achieves 35.98% higher structural similarity and 28.71% better replication of social phenomena such as power laws and echo chambers. Our results show that social graphs can serve as high-quality supervision signals for LLM post-training, closing the gap between agent behaviors and network dynamics for LLM-based simulation. Code is available at https://github.com/Ji-Cather/Graphia.git.

Abstract:
Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly advanced the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), but this progress is accompanied by substantial memory and latency overhead from the extensive Key-Value (KV) cache. Although KV cache quantization is a promising compression technique, existing low-bit quantization methods often exhibit severe performance degradation on complex reasoning tasks. Fixed-precision quantization struggles to handle outlier channels in the key cache, while current mixed-precision strategies fail to accurately identify components requiring high-precision representation. We find that an effective low-bit KV cache quantization strategy must consider two factors: a key channel’s intrinsic quantization difficulty and its relevance to the query. Based on this insight, we propose MixKVQ, a novel plug-and-play method that introduces a lightweight, query-aware algorithm to identify and preserve critical key channels that need higher precision, while applying per-token quantization for value cache. Experiments on complex reasoning datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing low-bit methods, achieving performance comparable to a full-precision baseline at a substantially reduced memory footprint.

Abstract:
While Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in solving complex tasks by orchestrating specialized agents and external tools, the implicit trust in tool outputs creates a critical attack surface. Existing tool attacks are limited by domain specificity or fixed and static templates. To address these challenges, we propose Evo-Attacker, which formulates the tool attack as a self-evolving, memory-augmented reinforcement learning process. Evo-Attacker constructs a dynamic attack memory and employs deliberative reasoning to retrieve adversarial patterns and strategize modifying interventions at critical moments. Furthermore, we introduce Attack-Flow GRPO to optimize intermediate reasoning steps via terminal outcomes, addressing the long-horizon credit assignment challenge. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Evo-Attacker consistently outperforms baselines, highlighting its generalization and evolutionary capabilities and the urgent need for defensive tool safeguards.

Abstract:
Continual Learning (CL) for Large Language Models (LLMs) faces a fundamental Stability-Plasticity Dilemma: balancing the plasticity to acquire new capabilities with the stability to preserve prior knowledge. While Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods, such as LoRA, enable efficient adaptation, we identify a critical flaw in current approaches termed Rank-Blindness: the enforcement of a single rank constraint across diverse tasks, which entangles task-shared and task-specific knowledge, leading to catastrophic forgetting of earlier tasks and underfitting on complex new ones. To address this, we propose SpaRTA, a novel rehearsal-free framework guided by a rank-spectrum perspective that explicitly disentangles knowledge into two orthogonal subspaces. Specifically, SpaRTA employs a low-rank branch to capture task-shared representations and a high-rank branch to model task-specific features. To integrate these complementary representations, we introduce a context-aware dynamic router that adaptively fuses the two branches based on input semantics, while an explicit orthogonality constraint minimizes interference between shared and specific parameter subspaces. This design effectively isolates task-specific updates from shared knowledge, preventing the overwriting of prior capabilities while preserving strong adaptation capacity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SpaRTA achieves a superior stability-plasticity balance compared to single-rank baselines. Notably, the proposed spectral disentanglement strategy substantially reduces inter-task interference and yields strong zero-shot generalization on unseen tasks. Our code will be available at https://github.com/Xnhyacinth/SpaRTA.

Abstract:
Attention scales quadratically with sequence length, fundamentally limiting long-context inference.Existing block-granularity sparsification can reduce latency, but coarse blocks impose an intrinsic sparsity ceiling, making further improvements difficult even with carefully engineered designs.We present S2O , which performs early s topping for s parse attention via o nline permutation.Inspired by virtual-to-physical address mapping in memory systems, S2O revisits and factorizes FlashAttention execution, enabling inference to load non-contiguous tokens rather than a contiguous span in the original order.Motivated by fine-grained structures in attention heatmaps, we transform explicit permutation into an online, index-guided, discrete loading policy; with extremely lightweight preprocessing and index-remapping overhead, it concentrates importance on a small set of high-priority blocks.Building on this importance-guided online permutation for loading, S2O further introduces an early-stopping rule: computation proceeds from high to low importance; once the current block score falls below a threshold, S2O terminates early and skips the remaining low-contribution blocks, thereby increasing effective sparsity and reducing computation under a controlled error budget.As a result, S2O substantially raises the practical sparsity ceiling.On Llama-3.1-8B under a 128K context, S2O reduces single-operator MSE by 3.82 × at matched sparsity, and reduces prefill compute density by 3.31 × at matched MSE; meanwhile, it preserves end-to-end accuracy and achieves 7.51 × attention and 3.81 × end-to-end speedups.

Abstract:
Modern large language models (LLMs) driven by scaling laws achieve emergent intelligence in large model sizes. Recently, the increasing concerns about cloud costs, latency and privacy make it an urgent requirement to develop compact edge language models. Distinguished from direct pretraining that bounded by parameter scaling law, this work proposes the unified pruning-aware pretraining, focusing on pretraining compact models while preserving performance of much larger source models, termed EfficientLLM. It features following characteristics: 1) Pruning in Pretraining Corpus: we introduce minimal parameter groups to decouple LLMs and continuously optimize model architecture with classic pruning methods like LLM-Pruner and SparseGPT during pretraining. We reveal that it achieves top-quality compact language models to scale up LLM pruning to large scale pretraining. 2) Auto-Designed Architecture: the LLM architecture is auto-designed during saliency-driven pruning, unifying pretraining, architectural design, and parameter pruning into a single process. Based on these, EfficientLLM significantly outperforms directly pretrained baselines with 100M ∼ 1B parameters, such as MobileLLM, SmolLM, Qwen2.5-0.5B, OLMo-1B, Llama3.2-1B in commen sense benchmarks, which bridges the performance gap between traditional LLM compression and direct pretraining. We open source on https://github.com/Xingrun-Xing2/EfficientLLM.

Abstract:
The dominant Fill-in-the-Middle (FIM) paradigm for code completion is constrained by its rigid inability to correct contextual errors and reliance on unaligned, insecure Base models. While Chat LLMs offer safety and Agentic workflows provide flexibility, they suffer from performance degradation and prohibitive latency, respectively. To resolve this dilemma, we propose Search-and-Replace Infilling ( SRI ), a framework that internalizes the agentic verification-and-editing mechanism into a unified, single-pass inference process. By structurally grounding edits via an explicit search phase, SRI harmonizes completion tasks with the instruction-following priors of Chat LLMs, extending the paradigm from static infilling to dynamic context-aware editing. We synthesize a high-quality dataset, SRI-200K , and fine-tune the SRI-Coder series. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that with minimal data (20k samples), SRI-Coder enables Chat models to surpass the completion performance of their Base counterparts. Crucially, unlike FIM-style tuning, SRI preserves general coding competencies and maintains inference latency comparable to standard FIM. We release our dataset and models, establishing SRI as a robust, secure, and efficient alignment recipe for next-generation interactive development.

Abstract:
Quotation recommendation enriches writing by suggesting quotations that fit a given context, but prior systems largely focus on topical relevance and overlook what makes quotes memorable. Based on a user study, we find that preferred quotations are often unexpected yet rational, motivating the goal of selecting quotes that are contextually novel while semantically coherent. We propose NovelQR, which (1) uses a generative label agent to map quotations and contexts into multi-dimensional deep-meaning labels for label-enhanced retrieval, and (2) reranks candidates with a token-level novelty estimator that mitigates auto-regressive continuation bias. Experiments on bilingual datasets across diverse domains show that NovelQR is preferred by human judges and improves overall recommendation quality over strong baselines, while achieving competitive novelty estimation.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in LLM-based multi-agent systems have demonstrated remarkable collaborative capabilities across complex tasks. To enhance the overall efficiency, existing methods often rely on aggressive graph topology evolution for agents (e.g., node or edge pruning), which risks prematurely discarding valuable agents due to transient issues such as hallucinations or temporary knowledge gaps. However, such hard pruning overlooks the potential for "zombie" agents to recover and contribute in subsequent discussion rounds. In this paper, we propose AgentRevive, a Markov state-aware framework for resilient multi-agent evolution. Our approach dynamically manages agent collaboration through soft state transitions, implemented via two key components: (1) State-Aware Policy Learning: Agent states are divided into "Active", "Standby", and "Terminated", selectively propagating messages based on agent memory. The policy employs a risk estimator to optimize agent state transitions by assessing hallucination risk, minimizing the influence of unreliable nodes while safeguarding valuable ones. (2) State-Aware Edge Optimization: Subgraph edges are pruned according to states learned from the policy, permanently removing "Terminated" nodes and retaining "Standby" nodes for subsequent rounds to observe potential future contributions. Extensive experiments on general reasoning, domain-specific, and hallucination challenge tasks show that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines and significantly reduces token consumption through state-aware agent scheduling.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) excel at natural language tasks but face deployment challenges due to computational demands. We introduce Dual Activation-Weight Sparsity (DAWS) , a training-free framework that jointly exploits activation and weight sparsity through magnitude-based routing. Systematic analysis of pretrained transformers reveals two key observations: (1) the activation energy is concentrated in a few neurons, and (2) activation and weight sparsity patterns are complementary between attention and FFN layers. DAWS employs a three-tier routing strategy: high-magnitude activations pass through full-precision weights to preserve critical pathways, medium-magnitude activations use magnitude-pruned sparse weights for efficiency, and low-magnitude activations are directly discarded. Unlike prior work that uses activation-aware pruning methods like WANDA, our approach uses direct magnitude-based pruning, which we show is more robust to sample-level variations. Experiments on Llama and Mistral models demonstrate that DAWS maintains >98% of dense model performance at 50% sparsity, outperforming WANDA, TEAL, and R-Sparse.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant improvement in offline video understanding. However, extending these capabilities to streaming video inputs, remains challenging, as existing models struggle to simultaneously maintain stable understanding performance, real-time responses, and low GPU memory overhead. To address this challenge, we propose HERMES, a novel training-free architecture for real-time and accurate understanding of video streams. Based on a mechanistic attention investigation, we conceptualize KV cache as a hierarchical memory framework that encapsulates video information across multiple granularities. During inference, HERMES reuses a compact KV cache, enabling efficient streaming understanding under resource constraints. Notably, HERMES requires no auxiliary computations upon the arrival of user queries, thereby guaranteeing real-time responses for continuous video stream interactions. HERMES achieves 10 × faster TTFT compared to prior SOTA. Even when reducing video tokens by up to 68% compared with uniform sampling, HERMES achieves superior or comparable accuracy across all benchmarks, with up to 11.4% gains on streaming datasets.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a standard method for improving reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) by eliciting step-by-step thinking, but its effectiveness in multimodal tasks remains unclear. In this paper, we aim to systematically investigate the key question: What can multimodal Chain-of-Thought reasoning do, and where and why does it fall short? To this end, we evaluate 12 multimodal tasks across perception and reasoning categories using both 14 non-reasoning models and 8 reasoning models. Our analysis reveals several important findings: (1) CoT is not a free lunch and should be used selectively depending on the specific requirements of each task. For perception tasks, CoT can lead to undesirable side effects, such as reduced performance in visual grounding and object counting. In contrast, it proves effective for reasoning tasks involving mathematical, scientific, and multi-image reasoning; (2) Compared to original models, existing open-source multimodal reasoning models often yield only marginal overall improvements, possibly due to an overemphasis on mathematical reasoning at the expense of broader capabilities; (3) Visual reasoning remains a key bottleneck for current multimodal CoT, as models exhibit a Look Light, Think Heavy” pattern where verbal reflection rises and falls during reasoning, whereas visual reflection consistently diminishes. These findings suggest that while multimodal CoT handles verbal reflection relatively well, it lacks the ability to maintain deep visual introspection throughout the reasoning process.

Abstract:
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) can deliver cargos to both tumor and immune cells, playing a crucial role in biomedicine. Traditional approaches rely on experimental screening and expert knowledge, which can be costly and time-consuming. Recent methods based on language models have accelerated this process using deep learning. Although these methods can retrieve molecules for fusion or rank candidates from existing libraries, they are still limited by the scope of known formulations. In this work, we propose a method, LiGen, to generate lipid molecules efficiently and actively, facilitating the discovery of high-performing LNP formulations. We first train a lipid-specific molecular language model, LiCore, to learn hidden representations of lipid molecules. We then explore the learned latent space to generate improved candidate formulations. This process is guided by a trained predictor, which evaluates delivery efficiency and provides directional signals. In reconstruction tasks, LiCore achieves nearly perfect reconstruction output with a low invalid ratio on both the LNP-Virtual900k and LNP-Exp12k datasets. The predictor consistently improves ranking-oriented metrics across multiple cell lines, with our method outperforming the best baselines by an average of 4.1%, 10.8%, and 8.1% in Top-50, Top-10, and Top-5 identification accuracy, respectively. Guided by the predictor, LiGen generates novel lipid candidates that achieve a 30.7% improvement over baseline methods on average, with some samples exceeding 50% improvement.

Abstract:
Despite strong medical benchmark accuracy, LLMs can exhibit severe multi-turn sycophancy in clinical dialogue, abandoning initial correct diagnosis under escalating pressure. We propose Med-Stress , a targeted stress test framework that evaluates belief stability under escalating pressure. Across nine frontier large language models (LLMs), we find a clear dissociation between medical knowledge and robustness: high initial diagnostic capability does not imply high belief stability, yielding large knowledge-robustness gaps for several LLMs. To mitigate this failure mode, we propose a lightweight inference-time defense, RBED ( R ole- B ased E pistemic D efense), and R-FT ( R esilience-oriented F ine- T uning), a training-time approach that internalizes evidence-based resistance to pressure. Experiments show that R-FT nearly eliminates belief change and substantially improves robustness.

Abstract:
Misleading visualizations are a potent driver of misinformation on social media and the web. By violating chart design principles, they distort data and lead readers to draw inaccurate conclusions. Prior work has shown that both humans and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are frequently deceived by such visualizations. Automatically detecting misleading visualizations and identifying the specific design rules they violate could help protect readers and reduce the spread of misinformation. However, the training and evaluation of AI models has been limited by the absence of large, diverse, and openly available datasets. In this work, we introduce Misviz, a benchmark of 2,604 real-world visualizations annotated with 12 types of misleaders. To support model training, we also release Misviz-synth, a synthetic dataset of 81,814 visualizations generated using Matplotlib and based on real-world data tables. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both datasets using state-of-the-art MLLMs, rule-based systems, and fine-tuned classifiers. Our results reveal that the task remains highly challenging. We release Misviz, Misviz-synth, and the accompanying code.

Abstract:
Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence regularization is essential for stabilizing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) in large language models (LLMs), yet its exact computation requires summing over vocabularies of all tokens, incurring prohibitive memory costs during training. Existing stochastic estimators circumvent this bottleneck by estimating KL divergence using only the sampled token from the trajectory, but suffer from high variance ( k 1 ) or systematic bias ( k 2 ). We propose TIKE (Top- k Importance-weighted KL Estimator), which exploits the Zipfian structure of language model distributions: by deterministically integrating over only the top- k tokens, TIKE captures most of the probability mass while effectively reducing memory cost. To ensure correctness in off-policy settings characteristic of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), we incorporate importance sampling weights that correct for distribution shift between rollout and optimization policies. Experiments on models across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that TIKE consistently outperforms stochastic baselines, while exhibiting substantially lower gradient variance. Our analysis reveals that TIKE closely tracks the exact Rao-Blackwellized estimator with near-zero variance, offering a practical path toward stable, memory-efficient KL regularization for reasoning-intensive LLMs training.

Abstract:
Large language models and agents have achieved remarkable progress in code generation. However, existing benchmarks focus on isolated function/class-level generation (e.g., ClassEval) or modifications to existing codebases (e.g., SWE-Bench), neglecting complete microservice repository generation that reflects real-world 0-to-1 development workflows. To bridge this gap, we introduce RepoGenesis, the first multilingual benchmark for repository-level end-to-end web microservice generation, comprising 106 repositories (60 Python, 46 Java) across 18 domains and 11 frameworks, with 1,258 API endpoints and 2,335 test cases verified through a “review-rebuttal” quality assurance process. We evaluate open-source agents (e.g., DeepCode) and commercial IDEs (e.g., Cursor) using Pass@1, API Coverage (AC), and Deployment Success Rate (DSR). Results reveal that despite high AC (up to 73.91%) and DSR (up to 100%), the best-performing system achieves only 23.67% Pass@1 on Python and 21.45% on Java, exposing deficiencies in architectural coherence, dependency management, and cross-file consistency. Notably, RepoGenesis-8B, fine-tuned on RepoGenesis (train), achieves performance comparable to GPT-5 mini, demonstrating the quality of RepoGenesis for advancing microservice generation. We release our benchmark at https://github.com/pzy2000/RepoGenesis .

Abstract:
Developing seamless, high-performance, native intelligent full-duplex Spoken Language Models (SLMs) remains a critical challenge and long-standing goal for the speech and NLP community. Despite notable progress, recent endeavors are fundamentally constrained by severe modality interference, which causes substantial knowledge degradation and compromises semantic integrity─ultimately making full-duplex SLMs feel unnatural and unintelligent. In this paper, through an exhaustive fine-grained analysis of model optimization dynamics, we uncover the root cause of such performance degradation, revealing that modality interference arises from inherent gradient conflicts between acoustic and semantic modeling when the two modalities are forced to share a deep parameter space. Guided by this key insight, we introduce Lychee-FD, a native end-to-end full-duplex framework designed to mitigate modality interference. Importantly, we propose a hierarchical parameter separation strategy that decouples conflicting modalities in deep layers while preserving cross-modality coherence via a dedicated semantic alignment channel. Extensive experiments on multiple full-duplex benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly advances the state of the art, yielding substantial improvements in both speech intelligence (+7.4% on Spoken QA) and full-duplex interaction fluidity (+28.5% on FullDuplexBench 1.5) without compromising inference efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to achieve two key advances: 1) uncovering and elucidating the root cause of modality interference in full-duplex SLMs, and 2) designing an elegant hierarchical model together with a practical solution for seamless, high-performance, native intelligent full-duplex SLMs.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have showcased strong performance across various reasoning tasks by leveraging System-2 thinking capabilities. However, existing studies indicate that this reasoning ability alone does not reliably transfer to the general alignment domain. Inspired by cognitive science and how humans solve tasks, we argue that LRMs must be equipped with metacognitive knowledge to fully utilize their System-2 capabilities. In this paper, we propose Priority-Aware Metacognition (PAM), which guides the model to first identify the top-level human preference (e.g., harmlessness) as a means of understanding the alignment task’s nature, and then apply other kinds of metacognitive knowledge to better monitor and regulate the model’s thinking process. We implement PAM via a two-stage pipeline: a cold-start phase that collects structured metacognitive knowledge based on Flavell’s theoretical framework, and a preference-optimization phase that further reinforces such metacognition. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of PAM. Under the same training pipelines, PAM consistently yields higher performance, improving general domain alignment performance by ~10 points on the helpfulness and harmless benchmarks. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PAM-RM-02DF.

Abstract:
Current conversational agents often follow static learning paradigms and miss the implicit, evolving feedback embedded in users’ follow-up behaviors. We propose IEvoAgent, an evolving conversational agent framework that leverages the structured dependency between agent responses and user reactions. We construct an annotated dataset from LMSYS-Chat-1M and WildChat and find consistent response-conditioned feedback patterns. Based on this finding, IEvoAgent uses a conditional feedback distribution matrix to estimate expected feedback rewards, combining offline KTO alignment with an inference-time prompt-evolution mechanism driven by a dynamic matrix. Experiments on MT-Bench-101, WildBench, and FB-Bench show improvements over open-source baselines, indicating that mining implicit feedback supports better multi-turn alignment under evolving user preferences. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Hualeez/IEvoAgent.

Abstract:
Large Language Models are increasingly utilized as Role-Playing Agents (RPAs) to simulate personas in interactive settings. However, current RPAs often produce flattened and stereotypical personas with limited depth and fidelity. This limitation arises from two core challenges: insufficient modeling of complex personal histories and internal logic, and ungrounded reasoning that fails to preserve persona coherence as dialogue context evolves. To address these challenges, we propose ThinkPersona, a role-playing agent trained to explicitly ground responses in individual identity. We introduce Persona Graphs as structured representations that encode life trajectories, values, relationships, and events as interconnected knowledge. We construct 1,201 Persona Graphs from real-world interviews and derive a Question–Reasoning–Answer (QRA) dataset of 23,401 samples that supervises reasoning over persona evidence. Fine-tuning on QRA enables ThinkPersona to internalize persona logic and generate persona-consistent responses in long-context dialogues. Experiments on three benchmarks show that ThinkPersona improves role-playing fidelity, behavioral consistency, and grounded reasoning over existing methods, while preserving general instruction-following capabilities. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Hualeez/ThinkPersona.

Abstract:
Tokenizers play a critical role in large language model studies. Despite recent advances, existing tokenizers fail to explicitly leverage historical tokenization results when making subsequent token decisions, nor do they selectively utilize such history based on contextual relevance. We propose SPEAK, a tokenizer that integrates spiking neurons to explicitly leverage historical tokenization results. Furthermore, we introduce an entropy-aware reset mechanism that selectively leverages history based on contextual relevance, which is determined by token-level entropy. High-entropy tokens are treated as contextual boundaries, whereas low-entropy tokens between consecutive such boundaries exhibit strong contextual relevance. Accordingly, we induce hard reset at high-entropy tokens to discard irrelevant historical tokenization results, and soft reset at low-entropy tokens to preserve and leverage relevant history. Experiments on 2 language models and 5 datasets spanning 16 languages demonstrate superior cross-lingual adaptability, with competitive performance and efficiency. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/zju-bmi-lab/SPEAK.

Abstract:
Many SLT systems quietly assume that brief chunks of signing map directly to spoken-language words. That assumption breaks down because signers often create meaning on the fly using context, space, and movement. We revisit SLT and argue that it is mainly a cross-modal reasoning task, not just a straightforward video-to-text conversion. We thus introduce a reasoning-driven SLT framework that uses an ordered sequence of latent thoughts as an explicit middle layer between the video and the generated text. These latent thoughts gradually extract and organize meaning over time. On top of this, we use a plan-then-ground decoding method: the model first decides what it wants to say, and then looks back at the video to find the evidence. This separation improves coherence and faithfulness. We also built and released a new large-scale gloss-free SLT dataset with stronger context dependencies and more realistic meanings. Experiments across several benchmarks show consistent gains over existing gloss-free methods. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/fletcherjiang/SignThought.

Abstract:
This work explores efficient ultra-long context modeling. We posit that an effective solution requires three fundamental properties: sparsity, random-access flexibility, and length generalization. To achieve this, we leverage Hierarchical Sparse Attention (HSA), a novel attention mechanism that satisfies all three properties. We integrate HSA into the Transformer architecture to develop HSA-UltraLong, an 8B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model trained on over 8 trillion tokens. We rigorously evaluate the model across tasks with both in-domain and out-of-domain context lengths to validate its capabilities. Our model demonstrates comparable performance to full-attention baselines on in-domain sequence lengths. Crucially, it achieves over 90% accuracy on most in-context retrieval tasks with contexts up to 512 times the pre-training context length. This work reports our findings and remaining issues throughout the experiments, offering insights for future research in ultra-long context modeling.

Abstract:
The gap between existing benchmarks and the dynamic nature of real-world legal practice poses a key barrier to advancing legal intelligence. To this end, we introduce J1-ENVS, the first interactive and dynamic legal environment tailored for LLM-based agents. Guided by legal experts, it comprises six representative scenarios from Chinese legal practices at three levels of environmental complexity. We further introduce J1-EVAL, a dual-metric evaluation framework, designed to assess both task performance and procedural compliance across varying levels of legal proficiency. Extensive experiments on 17 LLM agents reveal that while many models demonstrate solid legal knowledge, they struggle with procedural execution in dynamic settings. Even the SOTA model is below 60% overall performance . These findings highlight persistent challenges in achieving dynamic legal intelligence and offer valuable insights to guide future research.

Abstract:
Situated conversational recommendation (SCR), which utilizes visual scenes grounded in specific environments and natural language dialogue to deliver contextually appropriate recommendations, has emerged as a promising research direction due to its close alignment with real-world scenarios. Compared to traditional recommendations, SCR requires a deeper understanding of dynamic and implicit user preferences, as the surrounding scene often influences users’ underlying interests, while both may evolve across conversations. This complexity significantly impacts the timing and relevance of recommendations. To address this, we propose situated preference reasoning (SiPeR), a novel framework that integrates two core mechanisms: (1) Scene transition estimation, which estimates whether the current scene satisfies user needs, and guides the user toward a more suitable scene when necessary; and (2) Bayesian inverse inference, which leverages the likelihood of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to predict user preferences about candidate items within the scene. Extensive experiments on two representative benchmarks demonstrate SiPeR’s superiority in both recommendation accuracy and response generation quality. The code and data are available at https://github.com/DongdingLin/SiPeR.

Abstract:
The identification of harmful memes extends beyond a mere classification task, encompassing challenges related to multi-perspective semantic comprehension and hierarchical reasoning. Prevailing approaches predominantly depend on modal alignment or black-box classifiers, which fail to capture implicit biases and lack interpretability. In this study, we propose BPDMoE-Hate, a novel framework grounded in dual-space mixture-of-experts, which innovatively conceptualizes harmful meme detection as an integrated process of “viewpoint decoupling and hierarchical fusion”. Our approach generates adversarial binary perspectives via Visual-Language Models (VLMs) and incorporates an adaptive viewpoint gating to facilitate viewpoint selection, thereby enabling the model to autonomously discern implicit semantic inclinations. Moreover, we propose the Hyperbolic-Euclidean space expert to effectively capture the hierarchical structural relationships and semantic correlations between multimodal and viewpoint features, thereby enabling interpretable reasoning at the geometric representation level. Empirical evaluations conducted on three mainstream datasets demonstrate that BPDMoE-Hate not only substantially surpasses existing methodologies in performance but also offers visual explanations for viewpoint selection and hierarchical structuring, thereby advancing the field of interpretable multimodal content analysis.

Abstract:
Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for adapting Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to dynamic data streams, yet preventing catastrophic forgetting remains a major challenge. Existing parameter-efficient approaches often face a dilemma: fixed architectures suffer from knowledge interference, while dynamic strategies incur inefficient capacity expansion, limiting scalability. We propose MoBLoRA (Mixture-of-Bases LoRA), a novel framework for MCIT. Motivated by our geometric analysis revealing subspace redundancy across sequential tasks, MoBLoRA shifts the paradigm from expert selection to subspace mixing: it decomposes adaptation weights into a globally shared pool of orthonormal bases to capture task-invariant knowledge, and lightweight mixing matrices to encode task-specific variations. This design effectively decouples knowledge accumulation from task reconstruction. Experiments on standard benchmarks show MoBLoRA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods while maintaining superior parameter efficiency.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are expensive to serve because dense FFN blocks, multi-head attention, and KV caches dominate memory, making structured pruning a natural way to reduce serving costs under tight parameter and memory budgets. We present GRASPrune, a global budgeted structured pruning framework applied post-hoc to a pretrained model that jointly prunes FFN channels and attention KV head groups under a single global parameter budget. GRASPrune attaches lightweight learnable gates to prunable units and optimizes only these gates on a small unlabeled language-modeling calibration set, keeping all backbone weights frozen while enforcing the target sparsity at every step. A final budget-preserving scaling calibration reweights the surviving channels and heads to correct scale shifts introduced by pruning. On LLaMA-2-7B, GRASPrune removes 50% of parameters and achieves 12.18 perplexity on WikiText-2 while maintaining competitive average zero-shot accuracy on five downstream benchmarks, using a short calibration run of four epochs on 512 unlabeled sequences on a single NVIDIA A100 80GB GPU, all without any full-model fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Ultrasound is the preferred early cancer screening modality due to non-ionizing radiation, cost-effectiveness, and real-time imaging, yet conventional diagnosis relies heavily on physician expertise, causing significant subjectivity and limited efficiency. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) show promise but lack ultrasound-specific knowledge and multi-organ generalization. We propose EchoVLM, the first open-source 10-billion-parameter ultrasound-tailored VLM with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture. It is infused with knowledge across seven anatomical systems, trained on 208,941 clinical cases, 1.47 million ultrasound key-frame images, and over 100 diseases or imaging findings. Supporting clinical report generation, diagnosis prediction, and Visual Question Answering (VQA), it outperforms Qwen2-VL by 7.58 BLEU-1 and 3.45 ROUGE-1 points in report generation. This work shows substantial potential for establishing a general-purpose ultrasound VLM and lays a technical foundation for clinical translation. Source code and model weights are available at https://github.com/Asunatan/EchoVLM.

Abstract:
Automated feature generation extracts informative features from raw tabular data without manual intervention and is crucial for accurate, generalizable machine learning. Traditional methods rely on predefined operator libraries and cannot leverage task semantics, limiting their ability to produce diverse, high-value features for complex tasks. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-based approaches introduce richer semantic signals, but still suffer from a restricted feature space due to fixed generation patterns and from the absence of feedback from the learning objective. To address these challenges, we propose a Memory-Augmented LLM-based Multi-Agent System ( MALMAS ) for automated feature generation. MALMAS decomposes the generation process into agents with distinct responsibilities, and a Router Agent activates an appropriate subset of agents per iteration, further broadening exploration of the feature space. We further integrate a memory module comprising procedural memory, feedback memory, and conceptual memory, enabling iterative refinement that adaptively guides subsequent feature generation and improves feature quality and diversity. Extensive experiments on multiple public datasets against state-of-the-art baselines demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Masked diffusion language models present a promising paradigm for language modeling, yet the systematic theoretical analysis and comprehensive empirical validation of their alignment on general tasks remain relatively underexplored. In this paper, we identify the primary challenge for this problem: the high variance in Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO)-based likelihood estimates required for preference optimization. To address this issue, we propose Variance-Reduced Preference Optimization (VRPO), a framework that formally analyzes the bias and variance of the preference optimization loss and gradient based on Direct Preference Optimization, showing both are governed by a score-estimator variance. Building on this foundation, we introduce multiple unbiased variance reduction strategies, including optimal budget allocation and antithetic sampling, to improve alignment performance. We demonstrate the effectiveness of VRPO by applying it to LLaDA, a large diffusion language model. The resulting model, LLaDA 1.5, consistently outperforms its SFT-only predecessor consistently across various general benchmarks, such as mathematics (GSM8K +4.7), coding (HumanEval +3.0, MBPP +1.8), and alignment (IFEval +4.0, Arena-Hard +4.3). Furthermore, LLaDA 1.5 demonstrates a highly competitive mathematical performance compared to other strong language MDMs and ARMs. Our model is available at https://huggingface.co/GSAI-ML/LLaDA-1.5.

Abstract:
Large language models encode extensive world knowledge valuable for zero-shot named entity recognition. However, their causal attention mechanism, where tokens attend only to preceding context, prevents effective token classification when disambiguation requires future context. Existing approaches use LLMs generatively, prompting them to list entities or produce structured outputs, but suffer from slow autoregressive decoding, hallucinated entities, and formatting errors. We propose Just Pass Twice (JPT), a simple yet effective method that enables causal LLMs to perform discriminative token classification with full bidirectional context. Our key insight is that concatenating the input to itself lets each token in the second pass attend to the complete sentence, requiring no architectural modifications. We combine these representations with definition-guided entity embeddings for flexible zero-shot generalization. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art results on zero-shot NER benchmarks, surpassing the previous best method by +7.9 F1 on average across CrossNER and MIT benchmarks, being over 20× faster than comparable generative methods.

Abstract:
Multimodal Emotion–Cause Triplet Extraction in Conversations (MECTEC) is fundamental for fine-grained affect understanding, yet it remains challenging in multi-turn, multi-speaker settings. Existing methods often make locally plausible predictions but struggle to maintain conversation-level consistency under within-speaker emotion shifts and core events. To address this, we propose ECFlow, a unified framework that combines appraisal-guided structured generation with graph-structured reinforcement learning. ECFlow operationalizes cognitive appraisal theory into a controllable intermediate reasoning trace and constructs UMECS, a unified supervision dataset with cognitively grounded traces. It then lifts predicted and gold triplets into an Emotion–Cause Flow Graph and optimizes verifiable, structure-aware rewards for emotion-shift coherence and core-event consistency, together with task-oriented triplet rewards. Experiments on public MECTEC benchmarks show that ECFlow consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art triplet extraction and improved structure-aware metrics on emotion shifts and core events. Our code and dataset are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ECFlow-E908.

Abstract:
Diffusion Large Language Models (DLLMs) generate text via iterative masked-token denoising, supporting parallel prediction and bidirectional context modeling. Despite these advantages, decoding remains challenging: many tokens appear predictable early, yet single-step predictions are often unstable, exhibiting temporal oscillations or overconfidence, making it difficult to determine which tokens can be safely committed. To address these challenges, we propose DecoCal , a Decoding framework that explicitly performs Calibration of token-level confidence across diffusion steps and leverages the calibrated results to guide decoding decisions. Specifically, DecoCal aggregates historical predictions to maintain calibrated confidence, triggering unmasking only when a token is sufficiently stable, while a remasking mechanism allows revision of premature commitments. This calibration-based design enables early decoding of reliably converged tokens while deferring or correcting unstable ones, balancing reliability and speed. Experiments on multiple DLLMs and benchmarks show that DecoCal improves generation accuracy compared to existing strategies. Our results highlight the importance of temporal calibration in unlocking the full potential of diffusion-based language generation.

Abstract:
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) empowers large language models (LLMs) to tackle complex tasks by interleaving reasoning steps with external tool interactions. However, existing reinforcement learning methods typically rely on outcome- or trajectory-level rewards, assigning uniform advantages to all steps within a trajectory. This coarse-grained credit assignment fails to distinguish effective tool calls from redundant or erroneous ones, particularly in long-horizon multi-turn scenarios. To address this, we propose MatchTIR, a framework that introduces fine-grained supervision via bipartite matching-based turn-level reward assignment and dual-level advantage estimation. Specifically, we formulate credit assignment as a bipartite matching problem between predicted and ground-truth traces, utilizing two assignment strategies to derive dense turn-level rewards. Furthermore, to balance local step precision with global task success, we introduce a dual-level advantage estimation scheme that integrates turn-level and trajectory-level signals, assigning distinct advantage values to individual interaction turns. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of MatchTIR. Notably, our 4B model surpasses the majority of 8B competitors, particularly in long-horizon and multi-turn tasks. Our codes are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MatchTIR.

Abstract:
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) deliver strong long-context processing capability in a non-autoregressive decoding paradigm. However, the considerable computational cost of bidirectional full attention limits the inference efficiency. Although sparse attention is promising, existing methods remain ineffective. This stems from the need to estimate attention importance for tokens yet to be decoded, while the unmasked token positions are unknown during diffusion. In this paper, we present Focus-dLLM, a novel training-free attention sparsification framework tailored for accurate and efficient long-context dLLM inference. Based on the finding that token confidence strongly correlates across adjacent steps, we first design a past confidence-guided indicator to predict unmasked regions. Built upon this, we propose a sink-aware pruning strategy to accurately estimate and remove redundant attention computation, while preserving highly influential attention sinks. To further reduce overhead, this strategy reuses identified sink locations across layers, leveraging the observed cross-layer consistency. Experimental results show that our method offers more than 29× lossless speedup under 32K context length.

Abstract:
Detecting pre-training data in Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for auditing data privacy and copyright compliance, yet it remains challenging in black-box, zero-shot settings where computational resources and training data are scarce. While existing likelihood-based methods have shown promise, they typically aggregate token-level scores using uniform weights, thereby neglecting the inherent information-theoretic dynamics of autoregressive generation. In this paper, we hypothesize and empirically validate that memorization signals are heavily skewed towards the high-entropy initial tokens, where model uncertainty is highest, and decay as context accumulates. To leverage this linguistic property, we introduce Positional Decay Reweighting (PDR), a training-free and plug-and-play framework. PDR explicitly reweights token-level scores to amplify distinct signals from early positions while suppressing noise from later ones. Extensive experiments show that PDR acts as a robust prior and can usually enhance a wide range of advanced methods across multiple benchmarks.

Abstract:
Idiomatic expressions pose a major challenge for multilingual NLP because their meanings shift between figurative and literal usage, often requiring context for accurate interpretation. Prior work has focused on high-resource languages typically evaluates isolated idiom-meaning questions, overlooking realistic discourse. We introduce MIDI, a multilingual idiom dataset spanning 3 high-, 3 medium-, and 12 low-resource languages, curated by native speakers. Unlike previous datasets, MIDI provides idioms embedded in both sentence-level and conversational contexts, capturing both literal and figurative readings. Benchmarking state-of-the-art models shows that idiom comprehension degrades in low-resource languages and that, in all resource tiers, literal interpretations are substantially harder than figurative ones. Conversational context improves performance but does not eliminate these disparities. Through controlled tests and interventions on hidden representations, we further separate memorization from reasoning, exposing core limitations of current models.

Abstract:
Existing multi-LLM collaboration systems often encounter scalability challenges when integrating new LLMs and tasks, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this, we propose SMCS, a Scalable Multi-LLM Collaboration System designed to effectively coordinate multiple open-source LLMs. The system consists of two core components: a Retrieval-based Prior Selection (RPS) module, which dynamically selects the most suitable LLMs for each input, and an Exploration–Exploitation-Driven Posterior Enhancement (EPE) module, which fosters response diversity and selects high-quality outputs through a hybrid scoring mechanism. Experiments on eight mainstream benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our system: by integrating fifteen open-source LLMs, SMCS outperforms prevailing closed-source LLMs, e.g., GPT-4.1(+5.36%) and GPT-o3-mini(+5.28%) across multiple tasks. Remarkably, it even exceeds the average of best results on different datasets with open-source LLMs (+2.86%), significantly advancing the empirical performance frontier of open-source collaboration. The code is released at https://github.com/magent4aci/SMCS.

Abstract:
We introduce SPUR, a comprehensive benchmark for scientific experimental image perception, understanding, and reasoning, comprising 4,264 question-answering (QA) pairs derived from 1,084 expert-curated images. SPUR features three key innovations: (1) Panel-Level Fine-Grained Perception: evaluating the visual perception of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) across three dimensions (numerical, morphological, and information localization) on six fine-grained panel types; (2) Cross-Panel Relation Understanding: utilizing complex images with an average of 14.3 panels per sample to evaluate MLLMs’ ability to decipher intricate cross-panel relations; (3) Expert-Level Reasoning: assessment of qualitative and quantitative reasoning across five experimental paradigms to determine if models can infer conclusions from evidence as human experts do. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 MLLMs and four multimodal Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) methods reveals that current models fall significantly short of the expert-level requirements for scientific image interpretation, underscoring a critical bottleneck in AI for Science (AI4S) research.

Abstract:
For Large Language Models (LLMs) to be reliably deployed, models must effectively know when not to answer: abstain. Reasoning models, in particular, have gained attention for impressive performance on complex tasks. However, reasoning models have been shown to have worse abstention abilities. Taking the vulnerabilities of reasoning models into account, we propose our Query Misalignment Framework. Hallucinations resulting in failed abstention can be reinterpreted as LLMs answering the wrong question (rather than answering a question incorrectly). Based on this framework, we develop a new class of state-of-the-art abstention methods called Trace Inversion. First, we generate the reasoning trace of a model. Based on only the trace, we then reconstruct the most likely query that the model responded to. Finally, we compare the initial query with the reconstructed query. Low similarity score between the initial query and reconstructed query suggests that the model likely answered the question incorrectly and is flagged to abstain. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Trace Inversion effectively boosts abstention performance in four frontier LLMs across nine abstention QA datasets, beating competitive baselines in 33 out of 36 settings. The code is available at this https://anonymous.4open.science/r/trace-inversion-08BB/.

Abstract:
Existing benchmarks for Deep Research Agents (DRAs) treat report generation as a single-shot writing task, which fundamentally diverges from how human researchers iteratively draft and revise reports via self-reflection or peer feedback. Whether DRAs can reliably revise reports with user feedback remains unexplored. We introduce Mr Dre, an evaluation suite that establishes multi-turn report revision as a new axis. Mr Dre consists of (1) a unified long-form report evaluation protocol spanning comprehensiveness, factuality, and presentation, and (2) a human-verified feedback simulation pipeline for systematic multi-turn revision evaluation. Our analysis of five diverse DRAs reveals a critical limitation: while agents can address most user feedback, they also regress on 16–27% of previously covered content and citation quality. Over multiple revision turns, even the best-performing agents leave significant headroom, as they continue to disrupt content outside the feedback’s scope and fail to preserve earlier edits. We further show that these issues are not easily resolvable through inference-time fixes such as prompt engineering and a dedicated sub-agent for revision.

Abstract:
Online reinforcement learning (RL) serves as an effective method for enhancing the capabilities of Android agents. However, guiding agents to learn through online interaction is prohibitively expensive due to the high latency of emulators and the sample inefficiency of existing RL algorithms. We identify a fundamental limitation in current approaches: the Single State Single Action paradigm, which updates the policy with one-to-one state-action pairs from online one-way rollouts without fully exploring each costly emulator state. In this paper, we propose Android Coach, a novel framework that shifts the training paradigm to Single State Multiple Actions, allowing the agent to sample and utilize multiple actions for a single online state. We enable this without additional emulator overhead by learning a critic that estimates action values. To ensure the critic serves as a reliable coach, we integrate a process reward model and introduce a group-wise advantage estimator based on the averaged critic outputs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of Android Coach: it achieves 7.5% and 8.3% success rate improvements on AndroidLab and AndroidWorld over UI-TARS-1.5-7B, and attains 1.4x higher training efficiency than Single State Single Action methods PPO and GRPO at matched success rates.

Abstract:
Existing long-term personalized dialogue systems struggle to reconcile unbounded interaction streams with finite context constraints, often succumbing to memory noise accumulation, reasoning degradation, and persona inconsistency. To address these challenges, this paper proposes Inside Out, a framework that utilizes a globally maintained PersonaTree as the carrier of long-term user profiling. By constraining the trunk with an initial schema and updating the branches and leaves, PersonaTree enables controllable growth, achieving memory compression while preserving consistency. Moreover, we train a lightweight MemListener via reinforcement learning with process-based rewards to produce structured, executable, and interpretable ADD, UPDATE, DELETE, NO_OP operations, thereby supporting the dynamic evolution of the personalized tree. During response generation, PersonaTree is directly leveraged to enhance outputs in latency-sensitive scenarios; when users require more details, the agentic mode is triggered to introduce details on-demand under the constraints of the PersonaTree. Experiments show that PersonaTree outperforms full-text concatenation and various personalized memory systems in suppressing contextual noise and maintaining persona consistency. Notably, the small MemListener model achieves memory-operation decision performance comparable to, or even surpassing, powerful reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Gemini-3-Pro.

Abstract:
While Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) have achieved remarkable success in cross-modal comprehension, a significant gap persists in their ability to leverage such internal knowledge for high-quality generation. We formalize this discrepancy as Conduction Aphasia, a phenomenon where models accurately interpret multimodal inputs but struggle to translate that understanding into faithful and controllable synthesis. To address this, we propose UniCorn, a simple yet elegant self-improvement framework that eliminates the need for external data or teacher supervision. By partitioning a single UMM into three collaborative roles: Proposer, Solver, and Judge, UniCorn generates high-quality interactions via self-play and employs cognitive pattern reconstruction to distill latent understanding into explicit generative signals. To validate the restoration of multimodal coherence, we introduce UniCycle, a cycle-consistency benchmark based on a Text to Image to Text reconstruction loop. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniCorn achieves comprehensive and substantial improvements over the base model across six general image generation benchmarks. Notably, it achieves SOTA performance on TIIF(73.8), DPG(86.8), CompBench(88.5), and UniCycle while further delivering substantial gains of +5.0 on WISE and +6.5 on OneIG. These results highlight that our method significantly enhances T2I generation while maintaining robust comprehension, demonstrating the scalability of fully self-supervised refinement for unified multimodal intelligence.

Abstract:
In-context learning (ICL) enables models to adapt to new tasks via inference-time demonstrations. Despite its success in large language models, the extension of ICL to multimodal settings remains poorly understood in terms of its internal mechanisms and how it differs from text-only ICL. In this work, we conduct a systematic analysis of ICL in multimodal large language models. Using identical task formulations across modalities, we show that multimodal ICL performs comparably to text-only ICL in zero-shot settings but degrades significantly under few-shot demonstrations. To understand this gap, we decompose multimodal ICL into task mapping construction and task mapping transfer, and analyze how models establish cross-modal task mappings, and transfer them to query samples across layers. Our analysis reveals that current models lack reasoning-level alignment between visual and textual representations, and fail to reliably transfer learned task mappings to queries. Guided by these findings, we further propose a simple inference-stage enhancement method that reinforces task mapping transfer. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms and limitations of multimodal ICL and suggest directions for more effective multimodal adaptation.

Abstract:
Long-term memory is a critical challenge for Large Language Model agents, as fixed context windows cannot preserve coherence across extended interactions. Existing memory systems represent conversation history as unstructured embedding vectors, retrieving information through semantic similarity. This paradigm fails to capture the associative structure of human memory, wherein related experiences progressively strengthen interconnections through repeated co-activation. Inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we identify three mechanisms central to biological memory: association, consolidation, and spreading activation, which remain largely absent in current research. To bridge this gap, we propose HeLa-Mem, a bio-inspired memory architecture that models memory as a dynamic graph with Hebbian learning dynamics. HeLa-Mem employs a dual-level organization: (1) an episodic memory graph that evolves through co-activation patterns, and (2) a semantic memory store populated via Hebbian Distillation, wherein a Reflective Agent identifies densely connected memory hubs and distills them into structured, reusable semantic knowledge. This dual-path design leverages both semantic similarity and learned associations, mirroring the episodic-semantic distinction in human cognition. Experiments on LoCoMo demonstrate superior performance across four question categories while using significantly fewer context tokens. Code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/ReinerBRO/HeLa-Mem

Abstract:
While multi-modal large language models such as GPT-5 demonstrate exceptional general understanding, they suffer from a fundamental Spatial Execution Gap, failing to translate visual semantics into precise, schema-valid coordinate operations in interactive environments. In this work, we show that model scale alone cannot close this gap; instead, verifiable structured reasoning provides the key to spatial precision. We present a comprehensive pipeline that leverages Group Relative Policy Optimization to enforce a strict Identify-Reason-Verify protocol, effectively shifting the computational burden from parameters to test-time reasoning. By utilizing a multi-agent system to distill optimal reasoning schemas and training on execution-verifiable rewards, our specialized 3B agent achieves 100% format coherence and 81.12% operation accuracy on digital whiteboard tasks. Crucially, our approach outperforms a state-of-the-art frontier model, GPT-5, by 16.75% in operation accuracy. The results suggest that for complex user interface manipulation, small, RL-aligned models with dedicated reasoning protocols are superior to generalist frontier models, offering a promising direction for building reliable web agents.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, methods such as GRPO and DAPO suffer from substantial computational cost, since they rely on sampling many rollouts for each prompt. Moreover, in RLVR the relative advantage is often sparse: many samples become nearly all-correct or all-incorrect, yielding low within-group reward variance and thus weak learning signals. In this paper, we introduce ARRoL (Accelerating RLVR via online RoLlout Pruning), an online rollout pruning method that prunes rollouts during generation while explicitly steering the surviving ones more correctness-balanced to enhance learning signals. Specifically, ARRoL trains a lightweight quality head on-the-fly to predict the success probability of partial rollouts and uses it to make early pruning decisions. The learned quality head can further weigh candidates to improve inference accuracy during test-time voting. To improve efficiency, we present a system design that prunes rollouts inside the inference engine and re-batches the remaining ones for log-probability computation and policy updates. Across GRPO and DAPO on Qwen-3 and LLaMA-3.2 models (1B-8B), ARRoL improves average accuracy by +2.30 to +2.99 while achieving up to 1.7× training speedup, and yielding up to +8.33 additional gains in average accuracy in test-time voting.

Abstract:
Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in Text-to-Audio Generation (TTA), providing sound creators with powerful tools to transform inspirations into vivid audio. Yet despite these advances, current TTA systems often suffer from slow inference speed, which greatly hinders the efficiency and smoothness of audio creation. In this paper, we present MeanAudio, a fast and faithful text-to-audio generator capable of rendering realistic sound with only one function evaluation (1-NFE). MeanAudio leverages: (i) the MeanFlow objective with guided velocity target that significantly accelerates inference speed, (ii) an enhanced Flux-style transformer with dual text encoders for better semantic alignment and synthesis quality, and (iii) an efficient instantaneous-to-mean curriculum that speeds up convergence and enables training on consumer-grade GPUs. Through a comprehensive evaluation study, we demonstrate that MeanAudio achieves state-of-the-art performance in single-step audio generation. Specifically, it achieves a real-time factor (RTF) of 0.013 on a single NVIDIA RTX 3090, yielding a 100x speedup over SOTA diffusion-based TTA systems. Moreover, MeanAudio also shows strong performance in multi-step generation, enabling smooth transitions across successive synthesis steps.

Abstract:
Multi-step symbolic reasoning is essential for robust financial analysis; yet, current benchmarks largely overlook this capability. Existing datasets such as FinQA and ConvFinQA emphasize final numerical answers while neglecting the intermediate reasoning steps required for transparency and verification. To address this gap, we introduce FinChain, the first benchmark specifically designed for verifiable Chain-of-Thought evaluation in finance. FinChain spans 58 topics across 12 financial domains, each represented by parameterized symbolic templates with executable Python code that enable fully machine-verifiable reasoning and scalable, contamination-free data generation.To assess reasoning capacity, we propose ChainEval, a dynamic alignment measure that jointly evaluates both the final-answer correctness and the step-level reasoning consistency. Our evaluation of 26 leading LLMs reveals that even frontier LLMs exhibit clear limitations in symbolic financial reasoning, while domain-adapted and math-enhanced fine-tuned models can substantially narrow this gap.Overall, FinChain exposes persistent weaknesses in multi-step financial reasoning and provides a foundation for developing trustworthy, interpretable, and verifiable financial AI. This project is available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/finchain.git.

Abstract:
AI is rapidly transforming journalism, but the extent of its use in published newspaper articles remains unclear. We address this gap by auditing a large-scale dataset of 186K articles from online editions of 1.5K American newspapers published in the summer of 2025. Using Pangram, a state-of-the-art AI detector, we discover that approximately 9% of newly-published articles are either partially or fully AI-generated. This AI use is unevenly distributed, appearing more frequently in smaller, local outlets, in specific topics such as weather and technology, and within certain ownership groups. We also analyze 45K opinion pieces from Washington Post, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal, finding that they are 6.4 times more likely to contain AI-generated content than news articles from the same publications, with many AI-flagged op-eds authored by prominent public figures. Despite this prevalence, we find that AI use is rarely disclosed: a manual audit of 100 AI-flagged articles found only five disclosures of AI use. A factuality analysis shows AI-generated articles are 8.2 times more likely to contain hallucinated claims than human-written news. Overall, our audit highlights the immediate need for greater transparency and updated editorial standards regarding the use of AI in journalism to maintain public trust.

Abstract:
Data valuation is essential for enhancing the transparency and accountability of large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). However, existing methods typically rely on gradient computations, making them computationally prohibitive for billion-parameter models and precluding batch parallelization. In this work, we introduce For-Value, a forward-only data valuation framework that enables efficient batch-scalable value estimation while maintaining effectiveness. Leveraging the expressive power of pretrained LLMs/VLMs, we theoretically demonstrate that data valuation can be captured by the alignment between the final hidden representations and prediction errors at the last layer. In light of this insight, For-Value computes data value using a simple closed-form expression with a single forward pass, eliminating the need for costly backpropagation and enabling efficient batch calculating at scale. Extensive experiments show that For-Value matches or outperforms gradient-based baselines in detecting influential data and mislabeled data, while achieving significant efficiency improvements.

Abstract:
Mixture of Experts models are widely assumed to achieve domain specialization through sparse routing. In this work, we question this assumption by introducing COMMITTEEAUDIT, a post hoc framework that analyzes routing behavior at the level of expert groups rather than individual experts. Across three representative models and the MMLU benchmark, we uncover a domain invariant Standing Committee. This is a compact coalition of routed experts that consistently captures the majority of routing mass across domains, layers, and routing budgets, even when architectures already include shared experts. Qualitative analysis further shows that Standing Committees anchor reasoning structure and syntax, while peripheral experts handle domain-specific knowledge. These findings reveal a strong structural bias toward centralized computation, suggesting that specialization in Mixture of Experts models is far less pervasive than commonly believed. Crucially, this inherent bias indicates that current training objectives, such as load-balancing losses that enforce uniform expert utilization, may be working against the model’s natural optimization path, thereby limiting training efficiency and performance.

Abstract:
Industry classification schemes are integral parts of public and corporate databases as they classify businesses based on economic activity. Due to the size of the company registers, manual annotation is costly, and fine-tuning models with every update in industry classification schemes requires significant data collection. We replicate the manual expert verification by using existing or easily retrievable multimodal resources for industry classification. We present MONETA, the first multimodal industry classification benchmark with text (Website, Wikipedia, Wikidata) and geospatial sources (OpenStreetMap and satellite imagery). Our dataset enlists 1,000 businesses in Europe with 20 economic activity labels according to EU guidelines (NACE). Our training-free baseline reaches 62.10% and 74.10% with open and closed-source Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM). We observe an increase of up to 22.80% with the combination of multi-turn design, context enrichment, and classification explanations. We will release our dataset and the enhanced guidelines.

Abstract:
As LLM-generated text is increasingly used, especially in fictional domains, we explore how much LLM-generated stories differ from human-written stories. In this work, we focus on characters. We borrow definitions from narratology to analyze 8 intricate category-pairs of character, such as stylization and wholeness. These category-pairs consider more than just basic characteristics. They assess how characters are portrayed within their stories. After automatically inferring categories of characters within both LLM and human-written stories, we compare and contrast these two sets of stories. We consider the following overarching questions: (1) Do LLMs and human-written stories have similar characters? and (2) Do LLMs generate stories with a variety of characters? Our analysis includes research questions that focus on stories generated by popular LLMs and recently published human-written stories. We describe a number of interesting similarities, differences and key takeaways.

Abstract:
Multi-page visual documents such as manuals, brochures, presentations, and posters convey key information through layout, colors, icons, and cross-slide references. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer opportunities in document understanding, current systems struggle with complex, multi-page visual documents, particularly in fine-grained reasoning over elements and pages. We introduce SlideAgent, a versatile agentic framework for understanding multi-modal, multi-page, and multi-layout documents, especially slide decks. SlideAgent employs specialized agents and decomposes reasoning into three specialized levels–global, page, and element–to construct a structured, query-agnostic representation that captures both overarching themes and detailed visual or textual cues. During inference, SlideAgent selectively activates specialized agents for multi-level reasoning and integrates their outputs into coherent, context-aware answers.Extensive experiments show that SlideAgent significantly improves accuracy over both proprietary (+7.9%) and open-source models (+9.8%).

Abstract:
Most conversational agents (CAs) are designed to satisfy user needs through user-driven interactions. However, many real-world settings, such as academic interviewing, judicial proceedings, and journalistic investigations, involve broader institutional decision-making processes and require agents that can elicit information from users. In this paper, we introduce Information Elicitation Agents (IEAs) in which the agent’s goal is to elicit information from users to support the agent’s institutional or task-oriented objectives. To enable systematic research on this setting, we present YIELD, a 26M-token dataset of 2,281 ethically sourced, human-to-human dialogues. Moreover, we formalize information elicitation as a finite-horizon POMDP and propose novel metrics tailored to IEAs. Pilot experiments on multiple foundation LLMs show that training on YIELD improves their alignment with real elicitation behavior and findings are corroborated by human evaluation. We release YIELD under CC BY 4.0. The dataset, project code, evaluation tools, and fine-tuned model adapters are available at: https://github.com/infosenselab/yield.

Abstract:
The quality of text generated by large language models depends critically on the decoding sampling strategy. While mainstream methods such as Top- k , Top- p , and Min- p achieve a balance between diversity and accuracy through probability-space truncation, they share an inherent limitation: extreme sensitivity to the temperature parameter. Recent logit-space approaches like Top- n𝜎 achieve temperature invariance but rely on global statistics that are susceptible to long-tail noise, failing to capture fine-grained confidence structures among top candidates. We propose Min- k Sampling , a novel dynamic truncation strategy that analyzes the local shape of the sorted logit distribution to identify "semantic cliffs": sharp transitions from high-confidence core tokens to uncertain long-tail tokens. By computing a position-weighted relative decay rate, Min- k dynamically determines truncation boundaries at each generation step. We formally prove that Min- k achieves strict temperature invariance and empirically demonstrate its low sensitivity to hyperparameter choices. Experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks, creative writing tasks, and human evaluation show that Min- k consistently improves text quality, maintaining robust performance even under extreme temperature settings where probability-based methods collapse. We make our code, models, and analysis tools publicly available.

Abstract:
Agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise for performing sophisticated software engineering tasks autonomously. In addition, there has been progress towards developing agents that can perform parts of the research pipeline in machine learning and the natural sciences. We argue that research extension and its implementation is a critical capability for such systems, and introduce RExBench to support the evaluation of this capability. RExBench is a benchmark consisting of realistic extensions of 12 research papers that aim to investigate novel research hypotheses. Each task is set up as an extension to an existing research paper and codebase, accompanied by domain expert-written instructions. RExBench is robust to data contamination, and supports an automatic evaluation infrastructure that executes agent outputs to determine whether the success criteria are met. We use this benchmark to evaluate 12 LLM agents implemented using two different frameworks: aider and OpenHands. We find that all agents fail to autonomously implement the majority of the extensions, with the best agent at around 33% success rate. Although the success rate improves with additional human-written hints, the best performance under this setting remains below 44%. This indicates that current agents are still short of being able to handle realistic research extension tasks without substantial human guidance.

Abstract:
Learning from preference-based feedback has become an effective approach for aligning LLMs across diverse tasks. However, high-quality human-annotated preference data remains expensive and scarce. Existing methods address this challenge through either self-rewarding, which scales by using purely AI-generated labels but risks unreliability, or active learning, which ensures quality through oracle annotation but cannot fully leverage unlabeled data. In this paper, we present CoAct, a novel framework that synergistically combines self-rewarding and active learning through strategic human-AI collaboration. CoAct leverages self-consistency to identify both reliable self-labeled data and samples requiring oracle verification. Additionally, oracle feedback guides the model to generate new instructions within its solvable capability. Evaluated on three reasoning benchmarks across two model families, CoAct achieves average improvements of +13.25% on GSM8K, +8.19% on MATH, and +13.16% on WebInstruct, consistently outperforming all baselines.

Abstract:
In electronic health record (EHR) mining, learning high-quality representations of medical concepts (e.g., standardized diagnosis, medication, and procedure codes) is fundamental for downstream clinical prediction. However, robust concept representation learning is hindered by two key challenges: (i) clinically important cross-type dependencies (e.g., diagnosis-medication and medication-procedure relations) are often missing or incomplete in existing ontology resources, limiting the ability to model complex EHR patterns; and (ii) rich clinical semantics are often missing from structured resources, and even when available as text, are difficult to integrate with KG structure for representation learning. To address these challenges, we present MedCo, an LLM-empowered graph learning framework for medical concept representation. MedCo first builds a global knowledge graph (KG) over medical codes by combining statistically reliable associations mined from EHRs with type-constrained LLM prompting to infer semantic relations. It then utilizes LLMs to enrich the KG into a text-attributed graph by generating node descriptions and edge rationales, providing semantic signals for both concepts and their relationships. Finally, MedCo jointly trains a LoRA-tuned LLaMA text encoder with a heterogeneous GNN, fusing text semantics and graph structure into unified concept embeddings. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV show that MedCo consistently improves prediction performance and serves as an effective plug-in concept encoder for standard EHR pipelines.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) perform well on table tasks, they still make data referencing errors (DREs), i.e., incorrectly citing or omitting table values, despite understanding the table structure. Beyond final-answer accuracy, DREs directly compromise the correctness and reliability of intermediate reasoning steps. Yet prior studies have only offered limited, small-scale analyses. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of tabular data referencing errors across different models and tasks. Our results show that DREs occur across all tested models (1.7B to 20B parameters). Furthermore, we demonstrate that incorporating data referencing as a critic significantly improves answer accuracy up to 12.0%, through critic-based filtering and rejection sampling. Finally, we trained a lightweight 4B-parameter critic model that achieves an average F1 score of 78.2% in detecting both in-distribution and out-of-distribution DREs, and effectively assists inference for larger models.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown immense potential in Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC), yet bridging the modality gap between continuous graph embeddings and discrete LLM tokens remains a critical challenge. While recent quantization-based approaches attempt to align these modalities, they typically treat quantization as flat numerical compression, resulting in semantically entangled codes that fail to mirror the hierarchical nature of human reasoning. In this paper, we propose GS-Quant, a novel framework that generates semantically coherent and structurally stratified discrete codes for KG entities. Unlike prior methods, GS-Quant is grounded in the insight that entity representations should follow a linguistic coarse-to-fine logic. We introduce a Granular Semantic Enhancement module that injects hierarchical knowledge into the codebook, ensuring that earlier codes capture global semantic categories while later codes refine specific attributes. Furthermore, a Generative Structural Reconstruction module imposes causal dependencies on the code sequence, transforming independent discrete units into structured semantic descriptors. By expanding the LLM vocabulary with these learned codes, we enable the model to reason over graph structures isomorphically to natural language generation. Experimental results demonstrate that GS-Quant significantly outperforms existing text-based and embedding-based baselines.

Abstract:
Bias evaluation in large language models (LLMs) uses many metrics and benchmarks, but lacks a systematic way to measure agreement across bias metrics and models. As a result, improvements observed under one metric may contradict another, and model rankings may reflect benchmark-specific artifacts rather than stable bias profiles. In this work, we introduce Metric Agreement Score (MeAS) and Model Agreement Score (MoAS), which quantify cross-metric and cross-model agreement in bias rankings, respectively. We apply these measures to eight LLMs, seven bias metrics, and nine corpora. Our results reveal disagreement among both metrics and models: Contrary to expectations, we find that metrics within the same category (generation-based and probabilistic) often behave independently of each other. For instance, HONEST shows independence with toxicity metrics, and the Context Association Test shows no correlation with Language Modeling Bias metric. At the model level, DeepSeek-family models invert bias rankings relative to most others, indicating that the model family strongly shapes specific bias profiles. These findings challenge the assumption that bias mitigation is universally transferable and highlight the need for agreement-aware evaluation.

Abstract:
Automated Fact-Checking has largely focused on verifying general knowledge against static corpora, overlooking high-stakes domains like law where truth is evolving and technically complex. We introduce CaseFacts, a benchmark for verifying colloquial legal claims against U.S. Supreme Court precedents. Unlike existing resources that map formal texts to formal texts, CaseFacts challenges systems to bridge the semantic gap between layperson assertions and technical jurisprudence while accounting for temporal validity. The dataset consists of 6,294 claims categorized as Supported, Refuted, or Overruled. We construct this benchmark using a multi-stage pipeline that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to synthesize claims from expert case summaries, employing a novel semantic similarity heuristic to efficiently identify and verify complex legal overrulings. Experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal that the task remains challenging; notably, augmenting models with unrestricted web search degrades performance compared to closed-book baselines due to the retrieval of noisy, non-authoritative precedents. We release CaseFacts to spur research into legal fact verification systems.

Abstract:
As researchers delve more deeply into their work, paper search requirements may become more flexible, sometimes involving specific details such as module configuration rather than being limited to coarse-grained topics. However, previous paper search systems are unable to meet these flexible-grained requirements, as previous systems mainly collect paper abstract to construct corpus index, which lacks detailed information to support retrieval by some finer-grained queries. In this work, we propose PaperRegister, which transforms traditional abstract-based index into a hierarchical index tree, thereby supporting queries at flexible granularity. Experiments on paper search tasks across a range of granularity demonstrate that PaperRegister achieves the SOTA performance, and particularly excels in the fine-grained scenarios, highlighting good potential as an effective solution for flexible-grained paper search in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Scientific diagrams convey explicit structural information, yet modern text-to-image models often produce visually plausible but structurally incorrect results. Existing benchmarks either rely on image-centric or subjective metrics insensitive to structure, or evaluate intermediate symbolic representations rather than final rendered images, leaving pixel-based diagram generation underexplored. We introduce SciFlow-Bench, a structure-first benchmark for evaluating scientific diagram generation directly from pixel-level outputs. Built from real scientific PDFs, SciFlow-Bench pairs each source framework figure with a canonical ground-truth graph and evaluates models as black-box image generators under a closed-loop, round-trip protocol that inverse-parses generated diagram images back into structured graphs for comparison. This design enforces evaluation by structural recoverability rather than visual similarity alone, and is enabled by a hierarchical multi-agent system that coordinates planning, perception, and structural reasoning. Experiments show that preserving structural correctness remains a fundamental challenge, particularly for diagrams with complex topology, underscoring the need for structure-aware evaluation.

Abstract:
Red team testing, an effective proactive method for evaluating the security of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), requires an expanding toolkit alongside the development of MLLM safeguards. We propose the Reference Attack, a powerful tool for red team testing against MLLMs. The Reference Attack is a reference-guided cross-modal jailbreak method that enhances existing prompt-to-image injection attacks by exploiting MLLMs’ semantic reconstruction capabilities. Our method embeds malicious prompts in non-text modalities (e.g., images, spreadsheets) and constructs recursive symbolic references in text, enabling MLLMs to gradually recover and generate harmful content through layered reference resolution.The attack introduces a new vector that circumvents conventional content moderation by exploiting MLLMs’ lack of security checks during cross-modal reference resolution. We evaluate the Reference Attack on leading MLLMs, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and the widely used open-source LLaMA model, and achieved an attack success rate of over 93% across all tested models. Compared to state-of-the-art attacks, Reference Attack achieves higher success rates than all baselines under identical evaluation, with a maximum gain of 70.8%. Our study reveals a critical gap in MLLM security and highlights the need for strict security auditing of cross-modal interactions in future content moderation.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for document-based Open-domain Question Answering (ODQA) on large-scale industrial corpora faces two critical bottlenecks: routing failure in locating the correct document and evidence fragmentation in integrating scattered information. Existing approaches relying on flat text chunks or page-level images inherently struggle to (i) precisely pinpoint the target document among thousands of candidates and (ii) organically connect multimodal evidence, such as tables and figures, within a limited token budget. To address these challenges, we propose HiKEY, a hierarchical tree-based multimodal retrieval framework that elevates document hierarchy to a first-class retrieval signal. Instead of simple chunking, HiKEY reconstructs a logical heterogeneous graph via Document Hierarchical Parsing (DHP), explicitly encoding parent–child relationships. Adopting a hierarchical coarse-to-fine strategy, the framework (1) performs global routing to rapidly prune the search space using hierarchical indexing, and (2) conducts fine-grained retrieval to rank sections by employing a multimodal fusion strategy that captures the most discriminative evidence. Finally, HiKEY assembles a token-efficient evidence subgraph via a hybrid structural-semantic packing strategy. Experiments on ODQA benchmarks demonstrate that HiKEY significantly outperforms page- and chunk-based baselines, improving retrieval recall by up to 12.9% and end-to-end QA performance by up to 6.8%.

Abstract:
Diffusion language models (DLMs) have emerged as a powerful non-autoregressive alternative to GPT-style sequential generation, but suffer from substantial computational overhead due to their iterative parallel denoising. Existing acceleration works cannot accurately detect semantically stabilized tokens and then skip computation, leading to sub-optimal speedup in practice. This paper presents the first systematic study of convergence dynamics in DLMs. Innovative observations include the misalignment between traditionally used scalar detection criterion and the semantic convergence, and the post-peak confidence score, that wastes denoising computation and degrades inference quality. To address these limitations, we propose Ada-DLM, a semantic-aware adaptive denoising framework that encodes the trajectory of scalar confidence scores into an evolution-aware feature vector and then clusters vectors proactively and adaptively identify semantically converged tokens. Furthermore, we incorporate system-level optimizations to maximize runtime efficiency. Experiments show that Ada-DLM consistently outperforms the SOTA competitor, achieving up to 2x speedup and 19% quality improvement. That offers a practical path toward efficient high-quality DLM deployment.

Abstract:
Zero-shot reasoning on text-rich networks (TRNs) remains a challenging frontier, as models must integrate textual semantics with relational structure without task-specific supervision. While graph neural networks rely on fixed label spaces and supervised objectives, recent large language model (LLM)-based approaches often overlook graph context or depend on distillation from larger models, limiting generalisation. We propose TRN-R1-Zero, a post-training framework for TRN reasoning trained solely via reinforcement learning. TRN-R1-Zero directly optimises base LLMs using a Neighbour-aware Group Relative Policy Optimisation objective that dynamically adjusts rewards based on a novel margin gain metric for the informativeness of neighbouring signals, effectively guiding the model toward relational reasoning. Unlike prior methods, TRN-R1-Zero requires no supervised fine-tuning or chain-of-thought data generated from large reasoning models. Extensive experiments across citation, hyperlink, social and co-purchase TRN benchmarks demonstrate the superiority and robustness of TRN-R1-Zero. Beyond cross-domain transfer, TRN-R1-Zero, trained solely on node-level tasks, further generalises to edge- and graph-level tasks in a zero-shot manner. The codebase is open-source at [https://github.com/superallen13/TRN-R1-Zero](https://github.com/superallen13/TRN-R1-Zero).

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) perform well on Standard Chinese but struggle with low-resource Chinese dialects due to substantial phonological divergence. We investigate whether incorporating Middle Chinese, the common historical ancestor of most of the modern Chinese dialects, can improve dialectal pronunciation modeling in a linguistically interpretable manner. We focus on two specific task variants: (1) conditional sound change rule induction (a variant of Sound Law Induction, SLI), where models infer executable phonological transformation rules from Middle Chinese to modern dialects, and (2) sentence-level dialectal pronunciation transcription (a variant of Grapheme-to-Phoneme, G2P), requiring dialect-specific International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) generation. We construct a multi-source dataset covering Middle Chinese and 12 modern Chinese dialects, including character-level correspondences, rule exemplars, and sentence-level IPA transcription. We adopt a parameter-efficient training framework combining LoRA-based supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) for the first task. Across both tasks and a wide range of dialects and evaluation metrics, our approach achieves overall improvements over strong baselines, including DeepSeek-V3.2 and ChatGPT-5.2, while revealing variation across dialects. These results demonstrate the value of leveraging historical linguistic knowledge for modeling low-resource Chinese dialects.

Abstract:
Proactive task-oriented agents must autonomously anticipate user needs, identify actionable opportunities, and trigger software actions at appropriate moments—fundamentally shifting from reactive systems that await explicit instructions. However, existing approaches lack generalizable end-to-end solutions for measuring and optimizing such anticipatory behaviors.This paper introduces ProActor, a unified framework for conversational task scheduling that integrates: (1) a domain-agnostic automated annotation methodology that enables scalable proactiveness reinforcement learning (RL) by generating full opportunity time windows instead of rigid point labels, (2) systematic proactiveness metrics capturing both timing quality and reference action alignment, and (3) RL optimization using GRPO with various reward designs. Our insight is that RULER-based rewards with proactiveness rubrics are crucial for improving timing quality, and that proactiveness optimization enabled by stage-aware composite rewards is key to balancing timing quality and reference action alignment.Furthermore, we introduce ART-F, an adaptive RL framework that combines request-adaptive inference clusters with asynchronous training for better GPU utilization, enabling LoRA training of 4-bit Qwen2.5-14B-ProActor-Q4 models on 4×H200 and 8×H100 GPUs with substantial speedups. Experiments on two newly auto-annotated datasets demonstrate significant improvements in proactive timing while maintaining action consistency comparable to state-of-the-art baselines. Ablations validate the effectiveness of distinct composite reward variations.

Abstract:
Autonomous web agents powered by large language models (LLMs) show strong potential for performing goal-oriented tasks such as information retrieval, report generation, and online transactions. These agents mark a key step toward practical embodied reasoning in open web environments. However, existing approaches remain limited in reasoning depth and efficiency: vanilla linear methods fail at multi-step reasoning and lack effective backtracking, while other search strategies are coarse-grained and computationally costly. We introduce Branch-and-Browse , a fine-grained web agent framework that unifies structured reasoning-acting, contextual memory, and efficient execution. It (i) employs explicit subtask management with tree-structured exploration for controllable multi-branch reasoning, (ii) bootstraps exploration through efficient web state replay with background reasoning, and (iii) leverages a page action memory to share explored actions within and across sessions. On the WebArena benchmark, Branch-and-Browse achieves a task success rate of 35.8% and reduces execution time by up to 40.4% relative to state-of-the-art methods. These results demonstrate that Branch-and-Browse is a reliable and efficient framework for LLM-based web agents. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Branch_and_Browse/.

Abstract:
Federated fine-tuning enables privacy-preserving LLM adaptation but faces a critical bottleneck: the disparity between LLMs’ high memory demands and edge devices’ limited capacity. To break the memory barrier, we propose Chain Federated Fine-tuning (ChainFed), an innovative paradigm that forgoes end-to-end updates in favor of a sequential, layer-by-layer manner. It first trains the initial adapter to convergence, freezes its weights, and then proceeds to the next. This iterative train-and-freeze process forms an optimization chain, gradually enhancing the model’s task-specific proficiency. ChainFed further integrates three core techniques: 1) Dynamic Layer Co-Tuning to bridge semantic gaps between sequentially tuned layers and facilitate information flow; 2) Globally Perceptive Optimization to endow each adapter with foresight beyond its local objective; 3) Function-Oriented Adaptive Tuning to automatically identify the optimal fine-tuning starting point. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of ChainFed over existing methods, boosting average accuracy by up to 46.46%.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly enhances LLMs but faces high prefill latency during long-context processing. While KV cache reuse can mitigate this, current methods relying on shallow features or static heuristics often fail to identify critical tokens for recomputation, resulting in generation quality degradation.We have an insight that KV deviations are more pronounced in deep layers.However, directly extracting deep-layer features from the target model is computationally prohibitive. Crucially, we find that the deep-layer features of a lightweight speculative model exhibit strong consistency with the target model in the selection of critical tokens for recomputation.In light of these insights, we propose SpecCache, which employs deep-layer hidden-state norms from a speculative model as a proxy to guide the critical token selection for target large model.Experiments demonstrate that SpecCache outperforms state-of-the-art (SOTA) baselines. Compared to full KV recomputation, it reduces time-to-first-token (TTFT) by 2.17-3.95× and increases inference throughput by 2.7-5.2× , with negligible degradation in generation quality relative to full recomputation.

Abstract:
The Linux kernel is a critical system, serving as the foundation for numerous systems. Bugs in the Linux kernel can cause serious consequences, affecting billions of users. Fault localization (FL), which aims at identifying the buggy code elements in software, plays an essential role in software quality assurance. While recent LLM agents have achieved promising accuracy in FL on recent benchmarks like SWE-bench, it remains unclear how well these methods perform in the Linux kernel, where FL is much more challenging due to the large-scale code base, limited observability, and diverse impact factors. In this paper, we introduce LinuxFLBench, a FL benchmark constructed from real-world Linux kernel bugs. We conduct an empirical study to assess the performance of state-of-the-art LLM agents on the Linux kernel. Our initial results reveal that existing agents struggle with this task, achieving a best top-1 accuracy of only 41.6% at file level. To address this challenge, we propose LinuxFL+, an enhancement framework designed to improve FL effectiveness of LLM agents for the Linux kernel. LinuxFL+ substantially improves the FL accuracy of all studied agents (e.g., 7.2% - 11.2% accuracy increase) with minimal costs.

Abstract:
Question answering (QA) with reference texts is a classic application scenario for large language models (LLMs), where high standards for the credibility and traceability of generated answers are crucial. Many existing approaches focus on generating multi-level citations linked to specific references within the answer, making it verifiable and trustworthy. However, they often overlook key challenges such as citation granularity, the awareness of unknown information, and the adoption of effective training strategies. In this paper, we introduce Knowledge-informed Citation (KFC), which addresses these issues through a novel data construction pipeline, a new benchmark, and an innovative training strategy. With approximately 42K samples spanning 19 distinct domains, KFC includes both traditional citations referencing known entity-level information and specialized citations referring to unknown knowledge in the given question. This structure provides a more granular approach to citations, guiding the model to recognize and explicitly indicate unknown information, thus enhancing the quality and credibility of the response. Additionally, we propose a self-correction paradigm, Self-KFC, designed to fine-tune LLMs by refining poorly cited answers into more accurate ones, making it particularly suitable for citation-dependent scenarios. We present comprehensive experimental results to demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of Self-KFC on the KFC benchmark.

Abstract:
Parallel reasoning enhances Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) but incurs prohibitive costs due to futile paths caused by early errors. To mitigate this, path pruning at the prefix level is essential, yet existing research remains fragmented without a standardized framework. In this work, we propose the first systematic taxonomy of path pruning, categorizing methods by their signal source (internal vs. external) and learnability (learnable vs. non-learnable). This classification reveals the unexplored potential of learnable internal methods, motivating our proposal of STOP (Super TOken for Pruning). Extensive evaluations across LRMs ranging from 1.5B to 20B parameters demonstrate that STOP achieves superior effectiveness and efficiency compared to existing baselines. Furthermore, we rigorously validate the scalability of STOP under varying compute budgets—for instance, boosting GPT-OSS-20B accuracy on AIME25 from 84% to nearly 90% under fixed compute budgets. Finally, we distill our findings into formalized empirical guidelines to facilitate optimal real-world deployment. Code, data and models are available at https://bijiaxihh.github.io/STOP.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used not only to generate code, but also to judge it: comparing, ranking, or scoring competing solutions. However, their reliability in this evaluative role remains poorly understood. Inconsistent or flawed judgments can undermine benchmarks and distort training signals. This paper investigates the performance and robustness of LLMs when used as code judges. We introduce CodeJudgeBench, a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate LLM-as-a-Judge models across three critical coding tasks: code generation, code repair, and unit test generation. We comprehensively benchmark the performance of 26 LLM-as-a-Judge models, encompassing general-purpose, code-tuned, and reasoning models. Our empirical findings reveal that relatively small reasoning models (e.g., Qwen3-8B) can outperform much larger non-reasoning models up to 70B. We further stress-test robustness by applying both general and code-specific perturbations. All models show significant instability and are sensitive to changes such as response ordering, variable naming, and misleading comments. These findings highlight serious concerns about the consistency and robustness of LLM-based judges for coding tasks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning based post-training paradigms for Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) have achieved significant success by optimizing for visual-semantic tasks such as captioning or VideoQA. However, while these approaches effectively enhance perception abilities, they primarily target holistic content understanding, often lacking explicit supervision for intrinsic temporal coherence and inter-frame correlations. This tendency limits the models’ ability to capture intricate dynamics and fine-grained visual causality. To explicitly bridge this gap, we propose a novel post-training objective: Masked Video Prediction (MVP). By requiring the model to reconstruct a masked continuous segment from a set of challenging distractors, MVP forces the model to attend to the sequential logic and temporal context of events. To support scalable training, we introduce a scalable data synthesis pipeline capable of transforming arbitrary video corpora into MVP training samples, and further employ Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with a fine-grained reward function to enhance the model’s understanding of video context and temporal properties. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that MVP enhances video reasoning capabilities by directly reinforcing temporal reasoning and causal understanding.

Abstract:
Backdoor attacks are a significant threat to large language models (LLMs), often embedded via public checkpoints, yet existing defenses rely on impractical assumptions about trigger settings. To address this challenge, we propose Locphylax, a defense framework that requires no prior knowledge of trigger settings. Locphylax is based on the key observation that when deliberately injecting known backdoors into an already-compromised model, both existing unknown and newly injected backdoors aggregate in the representation space. Locphylax leverages this through a two-stage process: first, aggregating backdoor representations by injecting known triggers, and then, performing recovery fine-tuning to restore benign outputs. Extensive experiments across multiple LLM architectures demonstrate that: (I) Locphylax reduces the average Attack Success Rate to 4.41% across multiple benchmarks, outperforming existing baselines by 28.1%–69.3%. (II) Clean accuracy and utility are preserved within 0.5% of the original model, ensuring negligible impact on legitimate tasks. (III) The defense generalizes across different types of backdoors, confirming its robustness in practical deployment scenarios. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Locphylax.

Abstract:
Although studies have demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) can perform well on Out-of-Distribution (OOD) tasks, their advantage tends to diminish as the distribution shift becomes more severe. Consequently, researchers aim to retrieve distributionally similar and informative demonstrations from the available source domain to boost the inference capabilities of LLMs. However, in practical scenarios where the target domain is inaccessible, evaluating the unknown distribution is challenging, which indirectly impacts the quality of the selected demonstrations. To address this problem, we propose DOPA , a demonstration search framework that incorporates an OOD proxy to approximate the inaccessible target domain and guide the retrieval process. Building on proxy-based evaluation, DOPA further introduces a Mahalanobis distance-based global diversity constraint to ensure sufficient diversity among the retrieved demonstrations. Experimental results on multiple LLMs and tasks demonstrate that DOPA effectively enhances robustness in OOD settings.

Abstract:
The evolution from static ranking models to Agentic Recommender Systems (Agentic RecSys) empowers AI agents to maintain long-term user profiles and autonomously plan service tasks. While this paradigm shift enhances personalization, it introduces a vulnerability: reliance on Long-term Memory (LTM). In this paper, we uncover a threat termed “Visual Inception.” Unlike traditional adversarial attacks that seek immediate misclassification, Visual Inception injects triggers into user-uploaded images (e.g., lifestyle photos) that act as “sleeper agents” within the system’s memory. When retrieved during future planning, these poisoned memories hijack the agent’s reasoning chain, steering it toward adversary-defined goals (e.g., promoting high-margin products) without prompt injection. To mitigate this, we propose CognitiveGuard, a dual-process defense framework inspired by human cognition. It consists of a System 1 Perceptual Sanitizer (diffusion-based purification) to cleanse sensory inputs and a System 2 Reasoning Verifier (counterfactual consistency checks) to detect anomalies in memory-driven planning. Extensive experiments on a mock e-commerce agent environment demonstrate that Visual Inception achieves about 85% Goal-Hit Rate (GHR), while CognitiveGuard reduces this risk to around 10% with configurable latency trade-offs (about 1.5s in lite mode to about 6.5s for full sequential verification), without quality degradation under our setup.Latency reporting uses separate accounting: query-time overhead excludes one-time upload-time preprocessing.

Abstract:
Geographic reasoning is a fundamental cognitive capability that requires models to infer plausible locations by synthesizing visual evidence with spatial world knowledge. Despite recent advances in large vision-language models (LVLMs), existing evaluation paradigms remain largely outcome-centric, relying on static datasets and predefined labels that are conceptually misaligned with open-world geographic inference. Such outcome-centric evaluations often focus exclusively on label matching, leaving the underlying linguistic reasoning chains as unexamined black boxes. In this work, we introduce GeoArena, a dynamic, human-preference-based evaluation framework for benchmarking open-world geographic reasoning. GeoArena reframes evaluation as a pairwise reasoning alignment task on in-the-wild images, where human judges compare model-generated explanations based on reasoning quality, evidence synthesis, and plausibility. We deploy GeoArena as a public platform and benchmark 17 frontier LVLMs using thousands of human judgments, which complements existing benchmarks and supports the development of geographically grounded, human-aligned AI systems. We further provide detailed analyses of model behavior, including reliability of human preferences and factors influencing judgments of geographic reasoning quality. We open-source GeoArena to foster future research.

Abstract:
There is a significant gap in evaluating cultural reasoning in LLMs using conversational datasets that capture culturally rich and dialectal contexts. Most Arabic benchmarks focus on short text snippets in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), overlooking the cultural nuances that naturally arise in dialogues. To address this gap, we introduce ArabCulture-Dialogue, a culturally grounded conversational dataset covering 13 Arabic-speaking countries, in both MSA and each country’s respective dialect, spanning 12 daily-life topics and 54 fine-grained subtopics. We utilize the dataset to form three benchmarking tasks: (i) multiple-choice cultural reasoning, (ii) machine translation between MSA and dialects, and (iii) dialect-steering generation. Our experiments indicate that the performance gap between MSA and Arabic dialects still exists, whereby the models perform worse on all three tasks in the dialectal setup, compared to the MSA one.

Abstract:
With the rise of LLMs, there is an increasing need for intelligent recommendation assistants that can handle complex queries and provide personalized, reasoning-driven recommendations. LLM-based recommenders show potential but face challenges in multi-step reasoning, underscoring the need for reasoning-augmented systems. To address this gap, we propose ReRec, a novel reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) framework designed to improve LLM reasoning in complex recommendation tasks. Our framework introduces three key components: (1) Dual-Graph Enhanced Reward Shaping, integrating recommendation metrics like NDCG@K with Query Alignment and Preference Alignment Scores to provide fine-grained reward signals for LLM optimization; (2) Reasoning-aware Advantage Estimation, which decomposes LLM outputs into reasoning segments and penalizes incorrect steps to enhance reasoning of recommendation; and (3) Online Curriculum Scheduler, dynamically assess query difficulty and organize training curriculum to ensure stable learning during RFT. Experiments demonstrate that ReRec outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and preserves core abilities like instruction-following and general knowledge. Our codes are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ReRec/.

Abstract:
We study reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning of large language model (LLM) agents for long-horizon multi-turn tool use, where context length quickly becomes a fundamental bottleneck. Existing multi-turn RL pipelines suffer from degraded instruction following, excessive rollout costs, and most importantly, strict context limits. In this work, to address these challenges, we introduce summarization-based context management to training . In specific, it periodically compresses the tool using history by LLM-generated summaries that retain task-relevant information to keep a compact context while enabling the agent to scale beyond the fixed context window. Building on this formulation, we derive a policy gradient representation that seamlessly enables standard LLM RL infrastructures to optimize both tool-use behaviors as well as summarization strategies in an end-to-end fashion. We instantiate this framework with SUmmarization augmented Policy Optimization (SUPO), an LLM RL algorithm that enables long-horizon training beyond a fixed context limit. Experiments on interactive function calling and searching tasks demonstrate that SUPO significantly improves the success rate while maintaining the same or even lower working context length compared to baselines. We also demonstrate that for complex searching tasks SUPO can further improve the evaluation performance when scaling test-time maximum round of summarization beyond that of training time.

Abstract:
Deep research is an inherently challenging task that demands both breadth and depth of thinking. It involves navigating diverse knowledge spaces and reasoning over complex, multi-step dependencies, which presents substantial challenges for agentic systems. To address this, we propose FlowSearch, a multi-agent framework that actively constructs and evolves a dynamic structured knowledge flow to drive subtask execution and reasoning. FlowSearch is capable of strategically planning and expanding the knowledge flow to enable parallel exploration and hierarchical task decomposition, while also adjusting the knowledge flow in real time based on feedback from intermediate reasoning outcomes and insights. FlowSearch achieves competitive performance on both general and scientific benchmarks, including GAIA, HLE, GPQA and TRQA, demonstrating its effectiveness in multi-disciplinary research scenarios and its potential to advance scientific discovery. The code will be available.

Abstract:
Developing non-collaborative dialogue agents traditionally requires the manual, unscalable codification of expert strategies. We propose METRO, a method that leverages large language models to autonomously induce both strategy actions and planning logic directly from raw transcripts. METRO formalizes expert knowledge into a Strategy Forest, a hierarchical structure that captures both short-term responses (nodes) and long-term strategic foresight (branches). Experimental results across two benchmarks show that METRO demonstrates promising performance, outperforming existing methods by an average of 9%-10%. Our further analysis not only reveals the success behind METRO (strategic behavioral diversity and foresight), but also demonstrates its robust cross-task transferability. This offers new insights into building non-collaborative agents in a cost-effective and scalable way. Our code is available at https://github.com/Humphrey-0125/METRO.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are vulnerable to a growing array of multimodal jailbreak attacks, necessitating defenses that are both generalizable to novel threats and efficient for practical deployment. Many current strategies fall short, either targeting specific attack patterns, which limits generalization, or imposing high computational overhead. While lightweight anomaly-detection methods offer a promising direction, we find that their common one-class design tends to confuse unseen benign inputs with malicious ones, leading to unreliable over-rejection. To address this, we propose Representational Contrastive Scoring (RCS), a framework built on a key insight: the most potent safety signals reside within the LVLM’s own internal representations. Our approach inspects the internal geometry of these representations, learning a lightweight projection to maximally separate benign and malicious inputs in safety-critical layers. This enables a simple yet powerful contrastive score that differentiates true malicious intent from mere distribution shift. Our instantiations, MCD (Mahalanobis Contrastive Detection) and KCD (K-nearest Contrastive Detection), achieve state-of-the-art performance on a challenging evaluation protocol designed to test generalization to unseen attack types. This work demonstrates that effective jailbreak detection can be achieved by applying simple, interpretable statistical methods to the internal representations, offering a practical path towards safer LVLM deployment.

Abstract:
We introduce Traffic-R1, a 3B-parameter foundation model with human-like reasoning for Traffic signal control (TSC), developed via self-exploration and iterative reinforcement of LLM with expert guidance in a simulated traffic environment. Compared with traditional reinforcement learning and recent LLM-based methods, Traffic-R1 offers three main advantages: zero-shot generalization, transferring unchanged to new road networks and out-of-distribution incidents by leveraging internal traffic-control policies and reasoning; a compact 3B-parameter design that supports real-time inference on mobile-class chips for edge deployment; and an explainable TSC process that enables multi-intersection coordination through communication and an asynchronous communication network. Extensive benchmarks show Traffic-R1 outperforms strong baselines and training-intensive RL controllers. In production, the model now manages signals affecting over 55,000 drivers daily, reduces average queue lengths by more than 5%, and halves operator workload. We will open source our checkpoint and code to foster further research.

Abstract:
While diffusion and flow-matching models have advanced TTS, generating high-arousal emotions remains a persistent challenge due to the trade-off between stability and expressiveness. Existing systems often suffer from linguistic collapse when pursuing high intensity or fail to meet target emotional levels under stable settings. In this work, we identify that standard Gaussian initialization inevitably introduces a neutral prosody bias, while uniform Classifier-Free Guidance often distorts the acoustic manifold, leading to artifacts. To address this, we propose an inference framework that rectifies the emotional trajectory. An Emotion-Rectified Noise Prior injects a semantic gradient at initialization to align sampling with the target emotional manifold, and Likelihood-Inverse Guidance adaptively schedules guidance via a conditional/unconditional likelihood ratio, strengthening guidance only when the trajectory drifts toward a neutral fallback. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method effectively resolves the stability bottleneck in high-intensity scenarios, achieving superior linguistic accuracy and emotional fidelity without model retraining. Audio samples are available at https://showtts.github.io/emotionTTS/.

Abstract:
Language model families exhibit striking disparity in their capacity to benefit from reinforcement learning: under identical training, models like Qwen achieve substantial gains, while others like Llama yield limited improvements. Complementing data-centric approaches, we reveal that this disparity reflects a hidden structural property: distributional clarity in probability space. Through a three-stage analysis—from phenomenon to mechanism to interpretation—we uncover that RL-friendly models exhibit intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in their probability assignments to correct vs. incorrect responses. We quantify this clarity using the Silhouette Coefficient ( S ) and demonstrate that (1) high S correlates strongly with RL performance; (2) low S is associated with severe logic errors and reasoning instability. To confirm this property, we introduce a Silhouette-Aware Reweighting strategy that prioritizes low- S samples during training. Experiments across six mathematical benchmarks show consistent improvements across all model families, with gains up to 5.9 points on AIME24. Our work establishes distributional clarity as a fundamental, trainable property underlying RL-Friendliness.

Abstract:
Self-improvement has emerged as a mainstream paradigm for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large vision–language models (LVLMs), where models explore and learn from successful trajectories iteratively. However, we identify a critical imbalance during this process: the model readily generates high-quality trajectories for simple queries (i.e., head data) but struggles with complex ones (i.e., tail data). This bias drives the optimization to disproportionately prioritize simple reasoning skills, while inhibiting the acquisition of complex capabilities. As iterations progress, this imbalance becomes more acute—a dynamic we term the "Matthew effect", ultimately stalling performance gains. To mitigate this, we approach head-tail re-balance during the exploration-and-learning process from two perspectives: distribution-reshaping and trajectory-resampling. Extensive experiments on Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct and InternVL2.5-4B models across visual reasoning tasks demonstrate that our methods consistently improve visual reasoning capabilities, outperforming vanilla self-improvement baselines by an average of 3.86 points.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts Multimodal Large Language Models (MoE MLLMs) suffer from a significant efficiency bottleneck during Expert Parallelism (EP) inference due to the straggler effect. This issue is worsened in the multimodal context, as existing token-count-based load balancing methods fail to address two unique challenges: (1) Information Heterogeneity, where numerous redundant visual tokens are treated equally to semantically critical ones, and (2) Modality Dynamics, where varying visual to text ratios across tasks lead to resource misallocation. To address these challenges, we propose MACS (Modality-Aware Capacity Scaling), a training-free inference framework. Specifically, MACS introduces an Entropy-Weighted Load mechanism to quantify the semantic value of visual tokens, addressing information heterogeneity. Additionally, the Dynamic Modality-Adaptive Capacity mechanism allocates expert resources based on the real-time modal composition of the input. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MACS significantly outperforms existing methods on various multimodal benchmarks, providing a novel and robust solution for the efficient deployment of MoE MLLMs in EP inference.

Abstract:
Curriculum learning helps language models tackle complex reasoning by gradually increasing task difficulty. However, it often fails to generate consistent step-by-step reasoning, especially in multilingual and low-resource settings where cross-lingual transfer from English to Indian languages remains limited.We propose IRIS: Interleaved Reinforcement with Incremental Staged Curriculum, a two-axis framework that combines Supervised Fine-Tuning on progressively harder problems (vertical axis) with Reverse Curriculum Reinforcement Learning to reduce reliance on step-by-step guidance (horizontal axis). We design a composite reward combining correctness, step-wise alignment, continuity, and numeric incentives, optimized via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We release CL-Math, a dataset of 29k problems with step-level annotations in English, Hindi, and Marathi.Across standard benchmarks and curated multilingual test sets, IRIS consistently improves performance, with strong results on math reasoning tasks and substantial gains in low-resource and bilingual settings, alongside modest improvements in high-resource languages. Our code and dataset will be publicly available at https://github.com/avinanand/IRIS-Interleaved-Reinforcement-

Abstract:
Computational narrative analysis aims to capture rhythm, tension, and emotional dynamics in literary texts. Existing large language models can generate long stories but overly focus on causal coherence, neglecting the complex story arcs and orchestration inherent in human narratives. This suggests a structural misalignment between model- and human-generated narratives.We therefore position narrative analysis as a diagnostic proxy for generation and propose VISTA Space, a high-dimensional framework for narrative orchestration that unifies human and model perspectives while jointly characterizing narrative function and structure in a common space.We further introduce LitVISTA, a structurally annotated benchmark grounded in literary texts, which operationalizes VISTA Space for systematic evaluation of models’ narrative orchestration capabilities. Under an oracle setting with gold event anchors, we evaluate frontier LLMs including GPT, Claude, Grok, and Gemini. Results reveal systematic deficiencies, as current models struggle to jointly capture narrative function and structure and fail to form an integrated global view of literary narrative orchestration. End-to-end analysis further shows that failures are dominated by anchor identification and localization errors. Even advanced thinking modes yield mixed and often limited gains for literary narrative understanding.

Abstract:
Classroom discourse analysis is critical for tracing cognitive restructuring, yet existing research predominantly focuses on Dialogue Acts (DA), overlooking the deeper dimension of Opinion Evolution (OE). In this paper, we formally define the task of Classroom Opinion Evolution Recognition and introduce the Classroom Opinion Evolution Dataset (COED). Addressing the "Accuracy-Cost-Data" trilemma in real-world educational scenarios and the "overconfidence" failure mode of traditional confidence-based cascading systems on long-tail samples, we propose the Multi-task Enhanced Cascade Hybrid (MECH) framework. Grounded in the CODA (Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions) theory, MECH conceptually translates the "Action-Opinion" dualism into a risk-aware routing mechanism. Instead of relying solely on prediction confidence, this mechanism utilizes high-risk argumentative DA signals derived from multi-task learning to construct a "semantic safety net" effectively routing implicit or ambiguous samples to a Large Language Model for reasoning. Experimental results demonstrate that MECH achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 78.55% while reducing API costs by 44.4%. Furthermore, the framework exhibits robustness in few-shot scenarios (using only 20% of data), offering a cost-effective and interpretable solution for large-scale educational dialogue analysis. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/ywh24284-code/MECH.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based reasoning systems have recently achieved gold medal-level performance in the IMO 2025 competition, writing mathematical proofs where, to receive full credit, each step must be not only correct but also sufficiently supported. To train LLM-based reasoners in such challenging, open-ended settings, strong verifiers capable of catching step-level mistakes are necessary prerequisites. We introduce Hard2Verify, a human-annotated, step-level verification benchmark produced with over 500 hours of human labor. Hard2Verify is designed to rigorously assess step-level verifiers at the frontier: Verifiers must provide step-level annotations or identify the first error in responses generated by frontier LLMs for very recent, challenging, and open-ended math questions. We evaluate 29 generative critics and process reward models, demonstrating that, beyond a few standouts, open-source verifiers lag closed source models. We subsequently analyze what drives poor performance in step-level verification, the impacts of scaling verifier compute, as well as fundamental questions such as self-verification and verification-generation dynamics.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have recently achieved remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks. However, closer scrutiny reveals persistent failure modes compromising performance and cost: I) Intra-step level, marked by calculation or derivation errors; II) Inter-step level, involving oscillation and stagnation; and III) Instance level, causing maladaptive over-thinking. Existing endeavors target isolated levels without unification, while their black-box nature and reliance on RL hinder explainability and controllability. To bridge these gaps, we conduct an in-depth white-box analysis, identifying key neurons (Mixture of Neurons, MoN) and their fluctuation patterns associated with distinct failures. Building upon these insights, we propose NeuReasoner, an explainable, controllable, and unified reasoning framework driven by MoN. Technically, NeuReasoner integrates lightweight MLPs for failure detection with a special token-triggered self-correction mechanism learned via SFT. During inference, special tokens are inserted upon failure detection to actuate controllable remedial behaviors. Extensive evaluations across six benchmarks, six backbone models (8B 70B) against nine competitive baselines, demonstrate that NeuReasoner achieves performance gains of up to 27.0% while reducing token consumption by 19.6% 63.3%.

Abstract:
As Large Language Model applications (LLM apps) become widespread, system prompts that determine app behavior are increasingly regarded as intellectual property, raising concerns about leakage. Recent studies show that this threat is no longer theoretical, revealing the prevalence of cloned apps replicating system prompts from others on real-world platforms. These clones pose risks of copyright infringement and malicious misuse, highlighting the need for early and reliable detection. In this paper, we propose PROMPRINT, a novel fingerprinting approach for detecting cloned LLM apps without exposing their system prompts. Motivated by the insight that different system prompts yield distinct responses to the same query, PROMPRINT optimizes queries that induce the LLM to generate a specific first token associated with the given system prompt, resulting in distinctive query–first-token pairs. Experiments on four instruction-tuned LLMs show that generated pairs effectively identify the corresponding system prompts, achieving over 74% probability of generating the target token while remaining below 2.2% on average under other prompts. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our fingerprinting remains robust to partial system prompt modifications and effective under the injection of adversarial instructions.

Abstract:
Effective math tutoring requires not only solving problems but also diagnosing students’ difficulties and guiding them step by step. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promise, existing benchmarks largely overlook these tutoring skills. We introduce MMTutorBench, the first benchmark for AI math tutoring, consisting of 770 problems built around pedagogically significant key-steps. Each problem is paired with problem-specific rubrics that enable fine-grained evaluation across six dimensions, and structured into three tasks—Insight Discovery, Operation Formulation, and Operation Execution. We evaluate 12 leading MLLMs and find clear performance gaps between proprietary and open-source systems, substantial room compared to human tutors, and consistent trends across input variants: OCR pipelines degrade tutoring quality, few-shot prompting yields limited gains, and our rubric-based LLM-as-a-Judge proves highly reliable. These results highlight both the difficulty and diagnostic value of MMTutorBench for advancing AI tutoring.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance in complex reasoning tasks, driven by their powerful inference-time scaling capability.However, LRMs often suffer from overthinking, which results in substantial computational redundancy and significantly reduces efficiency.Early-exit methods aim to mitigate this issue by terminating reasoning once sufficient evidence has been generated, yet existing approaches mostly rely on handcrafted or empirical indicators that are unreliable and impractical.In this work, we introduce Dynamic Thought Sufficiency in Reasoning (DTSR), a novel framework for efficient reasoning that enables the model to dynamically assess the sufficiency of its chain-of-thought (CoT) and determine the optimal point for early exit.Inspired by human metacognition, DTSR operates in two stages: (1) Reflection Signal Monitoring, which identifies reflection signals as potential cues for early exit, and (2) Thought Sufficiency Check, which evaluates whether the current CoT is sufficient to derive the final answer.Experimental results on the Qwen3 models show that DTSR reduces reasoning length by 28.9%–34.9% with minimal performance loss, effectively mitigating overthinking.We further discuss overconfidence in LRMs and self-evaluation paradigms, providing valuable insights for early-exit reasoning.

Abstract:
Text simplification supports second language (L2) learning by providing comprehensible input, consistent with the Input Hypothesis. However, constructing personalized parallel corpora is costly, while existing large language model (LLM)-based readability control methods rely on pre-labeled sentence corpora and primarily target English. We propose Re-RIGHT, a unified reinforcement learning framework for adaptive multilingual text simplification without parallel corpus supervision. We first show that prompting-based lexical simplification at target proficiency levels (CEFR, JLPT, TOPIK, and HSK) performs poorly at easier levels and for non-English languages, even with state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-5.2 and Gemini 2.5. To address this, we collect 43K vocabulary-level data across four languages (English, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese) and train a compact 4B policy model using Re-RIGHT, which integrates three reward modules: vocabulary coverage, semantic preservation, and coherence. Compared to the stronger LLM baselines, Re-RIGHT achieves higher lexical coverage at target proficiency levels while maintaining original meaning and fluency.

Abstract:
Table serialization remains a critical bottleneck for Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex table question answering, hindered by challenges such as structural neglect, representation gaps, and reasoning opacity. Existing serialization methods fail to capture explicit hierarchies and lack schema flexibility, while current tree-based approaches suffer from limited semantic adaptability. To address these limitations, we propose ASTRA (Adaptive Semantic Tree Reasoning Architecture) including two main modules, AdaSTR and DuTR. First, we introduce AdaSTR, which leverages the global semantic awareness of LLMs to reconstruct tables into Logical Semantic Trees. This serialization explicitly models hierarchical dependencies and employs an adaptive mechanism to optimize construction strategies based on table scale. Second, building on this structure, we present DuTR, a dual-mode reasoning framework that integrates tree-search-based textual navigation for linguistic alignment and symbolic code execution for precise verification. Experiments on complex table benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.

Abstract:
Cross-document Relation Extraction (CodRE) requires reasoning over scattered evidence to identify relations between target entities across multiple documents. Existing methods indiscriminately fuse target entities and the intermediate bridge entities that link them into a unified representation. This leads to intermediate evidence that often aligns with only one side of the entity pair, resulting in one-sided relation transfer contextual bias and incomplete reasoning chains. Moreover, these methods typically employ a global threshold to determine relation existence for all entity pairs, limiting the model’s reasoning performance.To address these issues, we propose DEBAR (Dual-stream Entity Bias Reduction), a framework designed to explicitly decouple and preserve bidirectional bridge evidence, combined with a novel dynamic loss optimization objective. Specifically, DEBAR employs a bridge-aware input construction strategy and a dual-stream graph reasoning network to separately encode head and tail contexts, preventing semantic interference while capturing global dependencies through iterative message passing. Furthermore, we introduce a curriculum-aware ranking optimization objective that progressively tightens classification constraints to stabilize training and enforce discriminative decision boundaries. Experiments on the CodRE benchmarks show that DEBAR achieves state-of-the-art performance while effectively mitigating cross-document contextual bias. Moreover, extensive experiments on our proposed loss across backbones confirm its generalization, suggesting it as a reliable replacement for existing CodRE losses. Code is available at https://github.com/newyuyou/DEBAR.

Abstract:
Instruction-following is a foundational capability of large language models (LLMs), with its improvement hinging on scalable and accurate feedback from judge models. However, the reliability of current judge models in instruction-following remains underexplored due to several deficiencies of existing meta-evaluation benchmarks, such as their insufficient data coverage and oversimplified pairwise evaluation paradigms that misalign with model optimization scenarios. To this end, we propose IF-RewardBench, a comprehensive meta-evaluation benchmark for instruction-following that covers diverse instruction and constraint types. For each instruction, we construct a preference graph containing all pairwise preferences among multiple responses based on instruction-following quality. This design enables a listwise evaluation paradigm that assesses the capabilities of judge models to rank multiple responses, which is essential in guiding model alignment. Extensive experiments on IF-RewardBench reveal significant deficiencies in current judge models and demonstrate that our benchmark achieves a stronger positive correlation with downstream task performance compared to existing benchmarks. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/thu-coai/IF-RewardBench .

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning has empowered large language models to act as intelligent agents, yet training them for long-horizon tasks remains challenging due to the scarcity of high-quality trajectories, especially under limited resources. Existing methods typically scale up rollout sizes and indiscriminately allocate computational resources among intermediate steps. Such attempts inherently waste substantial computation budget on trivial steps while failing to guarantee sample quality. To address this, we propose SPARK (Strategic Policy-Aware exploRation via Key-state dynamic branching), a novel framework that selectively branches at critical decision states for resource-efficient exploration. Our key insight is to activate adaptive branching exploration at critical decision points to probe promising trajectories, thereby achieving precise resource allocation that prioritizes sampling quality over blind coverage. This design leverages the agent’s intrinsic decision-making signals to reduce dependence on human priors, enabling the agent to autonomously expand exploration and achieve stronger generalization. Experiments across diverse tasks (e.g., embodied planning), demonstrate that SPARK achieves superior success rates with significantly fewer training samples, exhibiting robust generalization even in unseen scenarios. Our code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/jinyangwu/SPARK.

Abstract:
Visual questions are often ambiguous: the same image–question pair may admit multiple valid answers depending on which region is referenced. However, current Visual Question Answering (VQA) systems typically collapse this ambiguity, committing to a single interpretation during decoding and evaluation. In this work, we study visual question ambiguity from a grounded, region-centric perspective. We operationalize ambiguity as the existence of multiple distinct answer-supporting regions in an image, each independently yielding a valid answer. This formulation makes ambiguity observable without requiring exhaustive multi-answer annotations. Based on this definition, we conduct a systematic empirical study of state-of-the-art Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). We find that, under default decoding, VLLMs consistently under-report ambiguity—even when multiple valid visual groundings are present. Importantly, probing model hidden states reveals that ambiguity-related signals are already encoded in their internal representations, despite not being reliably expressed in outputs. Finally, we show that selectively activating multi-focus answering based on these signals can recover additional valid answers while avoiding excessive hallucination. Together, our results suggest that ambiguity in VQA is not merely an annotation artifact or capability limitation, but a property that VLLMs internally recognize yet often fail to surface under standard decoding assumptions.

Abstract:
Structural understanding of natural language requires explicit recovery of internal meaning structures (entities, facts, nested relations), yet current structural-analytic tasks are fragmented by inconsistent task requirements across datasets. We investigate the problem of robust cross-task structural understanding under heterogeneous requirements across structural-analytic tasks and outline a perspective called Analytic NLP in which tasks can be reformulated into a representation-then-decision paradigm. In this paper, we suggest a solution for the representation layer, called Lingua-Graph, which explicitly captures entities, facts, and relations. By representing predictions as explicit graphs with labeled nodes and edges, Lingua-Graph also improves interpretability, enabling transparent inspection and error analysis of intermediate meaning structures. We construct a labeled Lingua-Graph dataset and train a baseline parser. Experiments show that Lingua-Graph provides substantially higher entity-structure hostability than alternative representations on average, and OpenIE systems based on Lingua-Graph achieve superior performance on three benchmarks, demonstrating that better intermediate structures translate into downstream gains. The data, code and the trained model are publicly released at https://github.com/rudaoshi/Lingua .

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as an effective approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), especially in scenarios where supervised fine-tuning (SFT) falls short due to limited chain-of-thought (CoT) data. Among RL-based post-training methods, group relative advantage estimation, as exemplified by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), has attracted considerable attention for eliminating the dependency on the value model, thereby simplifying training compared to traditional approaches like Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). However, existing group relative advantage estimation method still suffers from training inefficiencies, particularly when the estimated advantage approaches zero. To address this limitation, we propose Advantage-Augmented Policy Optimization (AAPO), a novel RL algorithm that optimizes the cross-entropy (CE) loss using advantages enhanced through a margin-based estimation scheme. This approach effectively mitigates the inefficiencies associated with group relative advantage estimation. Experimental results on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks and model series demonstrate the superior performance of AAPO. Code is available at https://github.com/JianxXiong/AAPO.

Abstract:
Amidst a shortage of qualified mental health professionals, the integration of large language models (LLMs) into psychological applications offers a promising way to alleviate the growing burden of mental health disorders. Recent reasoning-augmented LLMs have achieved remarkable performance in mathematics and programming, while research in the psychological domain has predominantly emphasized emotional support and empathetic dialogue, with limited attention to reasoning mechanisms that are beneficial to generating accurate responses. Therefore, in this paper, we propose Psyche-R1, the first Chinese psychological LLM that jointly integrates empathy, psychological expertise, and reasoning, built upon a novel data curation pipeline. Specifically, we design a comprehensive data synthesis pipeline that produces over 75k high-quality psychological questions paired with detailed rationales, generated through and iterative prompt-rationale optimization procedure, along with 73k empathetic dialogues. Subsequently, we employ a hybrid training strategy wherein challenging samples are identified through a multi-LLM cross-selection strategy for group relative policy optimization (GRPO) to improve reasoning ability, while the remaining data are used for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to enhance empathetic response generation and psychological domain knowledge. Extensive experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of Psyche-R1 across several psychological benchmarks, where our 7B Psyche-R1 achieves comparable results to 671B DeepSeek-R1.

Abstract:
Instruction-following is a fundamental ability of Large Language Models (LLMs), requiring their generated outputs to follow multiple constraints imposed in input instructions. Numerous studies have attempted to enhance this ability through preference optimization or reinforcement learning based on reward signals from LLM-as-a-Judge. However, existing evaluation models for instruction-following still possess many deficiencies, such as substantial costs and unreliable assessments. To this end, we propose IF-CRITIC, an LLM critic for fine-grained, efficient, and reliable instruction-following evaluation. We first develop a checklist generator to decompose instructions and generate constraint checklists. With the assistance of the checklists, we collect high-quality critique training data through a multi-stage critique filtering mechanism and employ a constraint-level preference optimization method to train IF-CRITIC. Extensive experiments show that the evaluation performance of IF-CRITIC can beat strong LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, including o4-mini and Gemini-3-Pro. With the reward signals provided by IF-CRITIC, LLMs can achieve substantial performance gains in instruction-following optimization under lowercomputational overhead compared to strong LLM critic baselines. Our code and model are available at https://github.com/thu-coai/IF-CRITIC .

Abstract:
Large Language Models have emerged as powerful tools for automating Register-Transfer Level (RTL) code generation, yet they face critical limitations: existing approaches typically fail to simultaneously optimize functional correctness and hardware efficiency metrics such as Power, Performance, and Area (PPA). Methods relying on supervised fine-tuning commonly produce functionally correct but suboptimal designs due to the lack of inherent mechanisms for learning hardware optimization principles. Conversely, external post-processing techniques aiming to refine PPA performance after generation often suffer from inefficiency and do not improve the LLMs’ intrinsic capabilities.To overcome these challenges, we propose ChipSeek, a novel hierarchical reward based reinforcement learning framework designed to encourage LLMs to generate RTL code that is both functionally correct and optimized for PPA metrics. Our approach integrates direct feedback from EDA simulators and synthesis tools into a hierarchical reward mechanism, facilitating a nuanced understanding of hardware design trade-offs. Through Curriculum-Guided Dynamic Policy Optimization (CDPO), ChipSeek enhances the LLM’s ability to generate high-quality, optimized RTL code. Evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate ChipSeek’s superior performance, achieving state-of-the-art functional correctness and PPA performance. Furthermore, it excels in specific optimization tasks, consistently yielding highly efficient designs when individually targeting fine-grained optimization goals such as power, delay, and area. The artifact is open-source in https://github.com/rong-hash/chipseek.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong reasoning and perception capabilities but are increasingly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. While existing work focuses on explicit attacks, where malicious content resides in a single modality, recent studies reveal implicit attacks, in which benign text and image inputs jointly express unsafe intent. Such joint-modal threats are difficult to detect and remain underexplored, largely due to the scarcity of high-quality implicit data. We propose ImpForge, an automated red-teaming pipeline that leverages reinforcement learning with tailored reward modules to generate diverse implicit samples across 14 domains. Building on this dataset, we further develop CrossGuard, an intent-aware safeguard providing robust and comprehensive defense against both explicit and implicit threats. Extensive experiments across safe and unsafe benchmarks, implicit and explicit attacks, and multiple out-of-domain settings demonstrate that CrossGuard significantly outperforms existing defenses, including advanced MLLMs and guardrails, achieving stronger security while maintaining high utility. This offers a balanced and practical solution for enhancing MLLM robustness against real-world multimodal threats. Our code is released https://github.com/ZhangXu0963/CrossGuard.

Abstract:
Medical large Vision-Language Models (Med-LVLMs) have shown strong potential in multimodal clinical applications such as medical visual question answering and report generation. However, Med-LVLMs remain challenged by hallucinations caused by modality misalignment, where models prioritize textual knowledge over visual evidence and generate outputs that conflict with medical images. To mitigate this issue, recent studies have explored preference optimization to improve image–text alignment, achieving promising results. Despite these advances, existing preference-based methods still face two limitations in medical settings: (1) overfitting to superficial cues, and (2) pseudo convergence of the preference signal. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Evidence-Guided Preference Optimization (DEPO), a new framework that enables evidence-aware and adaptive preference learning for Med-LVLMs. DEPO introduces Multi-Modal Evidence Perturbation (MEP) to suppress non-causal textual and visual shortcuts, and Dispreferred Evidence Resampling (DER) to continuously update dispreferred responses as hallucination patterns evolve. Experiments on multiple medical VQA and report generation benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing methods, with strong robustness across datasets and architectures. All Codes and data will be released after review.

Abstract:
Existing fraud detection methods predominantly rely on transcribed text, suffering from ASR errors and missing crucial acoustic cues like vocal tone and environmental context. This limits their effectiveness against complex deceptive strategies. To address these challenges, we first propose SAFE-QAQ, an end-to-end comprehensive framework for audio-based slow-thinking fraud detection. First, the SAFE-QAQ framework eliminates the impact of transcription errors on detection performance. Secondly, we propose rule-based slow-thinking reward mechanisms that systematically guide the system to identify fraud-indicative patterns by accurately capturing fine-grained audio details, through hierarchical reasoning processes. Besides, our framework introduces a dynamic risk assessment framework during live calls, enabling early detection and prevention of fraud. Experiments on the TeleAntiFraud-Bench demonstrate that SAFE-QAQ achieves dramatic improvements over existing methods in multiple key dimensions, including accuracy, inference efficiency, and real-time processing capabilities. Currently deployed and analyzing over 70,000 calls daily, SAFE-QAQ effectively automates complex fraud detection, reducing human workload and financial losses. Code: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SAFE-QAQ.

Abstract:
High-quality chain-of-thought has demonstrated strong potential for unlocking the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, current paradigms typically treat the reasoning process as an indivisible sequence, lacking an intrinsic mechanism to quantify step-wise information gain. This granularity gap manifests in two limitations: inference inefficiency from redundant exploration without explicit guidance, and optimization difficulty due to sparse outcome supervision or costly external verifiers. In this work, we propose CoT-Flow , a framework that reconceptualizes discrete reasoning steps as a continuous probabilistic flow, quantifying the contribution of each step toward the ground-truth answer. Built on this formulation, CoT-Flow enables two complementary methodologies: flow-guided decoding, which employs a greedy flow-based decoding strategy to extract information-efficient reasoning paths, and flow-based reinforcement learning, which constructs a verifier-free dense reward function. Experiments on challenging benchmarks demonstrate that CoT-Flow achieves a superior balance between inference efficiency and reasoning performance.

Abstract:
Medical diagnostics is a high-stakes and complex domain that is critical to patient care. However, current evaluations of large language models (LLMs) remain limited in capturing key challenges of clinical diagnostic scenarios. Most rely on benchmarks derived from public exams, raising contamination bias that can inflate performance, and they overlook the confounded nature of real consultations beyond textbook cases. Recent dynamic evaluations offer a promising alternative, but often remain insufficient for diagnosis-oriented benchmarking, with limited coverage of clinically grounded confounders and trustworthiness beyond accuracy. To address these gaps, we propose DyReMe, a dynamic benchmark for medical diagnostics that provides a controlled and scalable stress test of diagnostic robustness. Unlike static exam-style questions, DyReMe generates fresh, consultation-style cases that incorporate clinically grounded confounders, such as differential diagnoses and common misdiagnosis factors. It also varies expression styles to capture heterogeneous patient-style descriptions. Beyond accuracy, DyReMe evaluates LLMs on three additional clinically relevant dimensions: veracity, helpfulness, and consistency. Our experiments show that this dynamic approach yields more challenging assessments and exposes substantial weaknesses of stateof-the-art LLMs under clinically confounded diagnostic settings. These findings highlight the urgent need for evaluation frameworks that better assess trustworthy medical diagnostics under clinically grounded confounders.

Abstract:
With the surge of online misinformation, Large Language Models (LLMs) and Reasoning Large Language Models (RLMs) serving as Automatic Fact-Checking (AFC) systems have emerged as a prominent paradigm for reliable, explainable verification. However, our empirical study reveals that this paradigm faces a critical risk asymmetry challenge when deployed in real-world under resource-constrained environments. While Hotspot Perception Ability (HPA), the capacity to dynamically allocate reasoning resources based on social impact, is essential to mitigate this risk, existing benchmarks lack the social metadata and evaluation framework to meet this urgent evaluation needs, thereby hindering the advancement of these AFC systems. To bridge this gap, we introduce TrendFact, the first benchmark capable of evaluating HPA and three fact-checking tasks. It consists of 7,643 curated samples sourced from trending platforms and professional datasets, with an evidence library containing 366,634 entries. To enable HPA assessment, we propose two novel metrics: the Explanation Consistency Score (ECS) to evaluate the reliability of verification reasoning, and the Hotspot Claim Perception Index (HCPI) to quantify the overall HPA of AFC systems. Extensive experiments demonstrate that existing AFC systems exhibit limited performance on TrendFact. Furthermore, our proposed FactISR framework effectively enhances HPA and computational efficiency for RLM-driven systems.

Abstract:
Mental health disorders represent a burgeoning global public health challenge. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in psychiatric assessment, their clinical utility is severely constrained by benchmarks that lack ecological validity and fine-grained diagnostic supervision. To bridge this gap, we introduce MentalDx Bench , the first benchmark dedicated to disorder-level psychiatric diagnosis within real-world clinical settings. Comprising 712 de-identified electronic health records annotated by board-certified psychiatrists under ICD-11 guidelines, the benchmark covers 76 disorders across 16 diagnostic categories. Evaluation of 18 LLMs reveals a critical paradigm misalignment : strong performance at coarse diagnostic categorization contrasts with systematic failure at disorder-level diagnosis, underscoring a gap between pattern-based modeling and clinical hypothetico-deductive reasoning.In response, we propose MentalSeek-Dx , a medical-specialized LLM trained to internalize this clinical reasoning process through supervised trajectory construction and curriculum-based reinforcement learning. Experiments on MentalDx Bench demonstrate that MentalSeek-Dx achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance with only 14B parameters, establishing a clinically grounded framework for reliable psychiatric diagnosis. The dataset and code are available.

Abstract:
Medical Multimodal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) require egocentric clinical intent understanding for real-world deployment, yet existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this critical capability. We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation. Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical workflows, and implicit adherence to safety protocols. We propose a Three-Dimensional Clinical Intent Framework evaluating: (1) Spatial Intent—discriminating precise targets amid visual noise, (2) Temporal Intent—inferring causal rationale through retrospective and prospective reasoning, and (3) Standard Intent—verifying protocol compliance through safety checks. Beyond accuracy metrics, we introduce Trap QA mechanisms to stress-test clinical reliability by penalizing hallucinations and cognitive sycophancy. Experiments reveal current MLLMs struggle with egocentric intent due to over-reliance on global features, leading to fabricated observations and uncritical acceptance of invalid instructions.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, yet their autoregressive generation paradigm makes it computationally expensive to explore diverse reasoning paths. In contrast, diffusion language models (DLMs) adopt a parallel, non-autoregressive generation mechanism that enables the efficient production of diverse candidate outputs. Motivated by this complementarity, we explore a collaborative reasoning framework that combines diffusion-based generation with autoregressive evaluation. Specifically, we leverage DLMs to efficiently generate diverse intermediate reasoning thoughts, and employ LLMs as evaluators to assess and select candidates based on their plausibility and correctness. By decoupling proposal generation from evaluation, our framework exploits the strengths of both models: efficient exploration from diffusion models and causally grounded assessment from autoregressive models, which naturally aligns with the divergent-convergent thinking framework in cognitive psychology. Experiments across various mathematical and logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our framework improves inference efficiency while maintaining competitive or superior reasoning accuracy, laying the groundwork for building efficient reasoning architectures. Our code is open-source at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Diffuse-Thinking-EC60.

Abstract:
Standardized patients (SPs) are indispensable for clinical skills training but remain expensive and difficult to scale. Although large language model (LLM)-based virtual standardized patients (VSPs) have been proposed as an alternative, their behavior remains unstable and lacks rigorous comparison with human standardized patients. We propose EasyMED, a multi-agent VSP framework that separates case-grounded information disclosure from response generation to support stable, inquiry-conditioned patient behavior. We also introduce SPBench, a human-grounded benchmark with eight expert-defined criteria for interaction-level evaluation. Experiments show that EasyMED more closely matches human SP behavior than existing VSPs, particularly in case consistency and controlled disclosure. A four-week controlled study further demonstrates learning outcomes comparable to human SP training, with stronger early gains for novice learners and improved flexibility, psychological safety, and cost efficiency.

Abstract:
The increasing context window greatly extends the capabilities of large language models, but on the other hand, it incurs an unaffordable memory overhead and computational latency due to the increasing Key-Value (KV) cache size. Recent KV cache compression methods manage to reduce the cache size by dropping irrelevant KVs. However, these methods often fail to identify crucial KVs for generation while excluding others accurately, resulting in severe information loss. To address this gap, we propose IntentKV, an intention-aware KV cache eviction method that identifies and retains crucial KVs according to the attention distribution of intention, which semantically reflects the user’s goal and determines which part of the context is relevant. The consistency between the semantics and attention distribution is further substantiated through meticulously designed experiments. On this basis, IntentKV first distinguishes intention tokens from the vanilla context tokens based on their attention distribution distances. Then, the block-wise cumulative attention is calculated via aggregating the intention token attention. Finally, blocks that acquire high cumulative attention are picked and stored in KV cache. We evaluate our method across diverse long-context tasks and models. Results demonstrate that IntentKV can effectively maintain the model performance while reducing the KV cache size from 128K to 2K, leading to a 6.3x increase in decoding speed and 7.8x enhancement in memory efficiency compared to the default setting.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve high accuracy on established Classical Chinese Poetry benchmarks, it remains challenging to distinguish transferable Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning from reliance on familiar pre-training patterns. To address this issue, we introduce Neo-Classic, an evaluation benchmark that combines a constructionist Out-of-Sample (OOS) dataset with a suite of reverse understanding probes. Unlike traditional benchmarks that rely on verification or generation over historical corpora, Neo-Classic comprises strictly metrical poetry authored by contemporary experts, reducing the possibility of direct retrieval. We evaluate state-of-the-art models, including Qwen3-Max, Gemini-3-Pro, and DeepSeek-V3.2, across five behavioral probes designed to test hierarchical constraint satisfaction. Our results reveal two primary limitations. First, a performance gap of 20%–50% emerges when models transition from historical to contemporary texts. Second, models exhibit substantial difficulties in discourse-level ordering tasks, with standard accuracy remaining low (0–13%). Although expert-level guidance improves the performance of reasoning-enhanced models to 36%, a notable gap with human experts persists. These findings suggest that while current LLMs capture local formal patterns, they struggle with global hierarchical planning required for robust Linguistic-Aesthetic Reasoning.

Abstract:
Recent studies in difficulty-controlled reading comprehension item generation have leveraged large language models (LLMs) to produce items by adjusting difficulty-related features. However, existing methods typically rely on a single-agent prompting approach, which often fails to consistently satisfy specified feature constraints, resulting in items that deviate from the target difficulty level. To address this limitation, we introduce MAFIG, a Multi-agent Framework for Feature-constrained Item Generation, where multiple LLM agents and feature-specific evaluators collaborate to generate and iteratively revise items based on intended constraints. Furthermore, to verify the efficacy of MAFIG in difficulty control, we propose a method for constructing a sequence of feature constraint sets that yield items with monotonically increasing difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that MAFIG generates items that adhere to target constraints at a significantly higher rate than baselines, achieving robust difficulty control through the difficulty-calibrated constraint sequence.

Abstract:
Agentic search augments large language models (LLMs) with external knowledge through reinforcement learning. However, existing approaches suffer from blind reliance on noisy retrieval and hallucination when both parametric and external knowledge fail—reflecting a lack of calibration regarding the model’s knowledge boundary. We propose Knowledge boundary Policy Optimization (KbPO), a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly aligns retrieval decisions with quantified knowledge states. KbPO introduces: (1) a semantic stability metric to delineate reliable parametric knowledge; (2) a four-quadrant taxonomy synthesising internal certainty with retrieval quality; and (3) a quadrant-based reward mechanism incentivising calibrated behaviour. We further adopt an iterative query evolution pipeline to construct boundary-probing training samples. Experiments on ten benchmarks demonstrate that KbPO outperforms strong baselines while exhibiting reduced hallucination rates.

Abstract:
Optimizing distributed training strategies for large-scale deep learning models remains a critical challenge in both industry and academia, demanding extensive domain expertise and manual tuning. Existing automated distributed training frameworks are plagued by over-reliance on prior profiling, poor generalization across models/hardware, and scalability constraints stemming from vast search spaces, impeding real-world applicability. To address these challenges, we propose OptiCo, a model-driven multi-agent framework that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to enable automatic and explainable distributed training strategy configuration. OptiCo orchestrates a team of reasoning-driven agents, through a shared Global Message Pool facilitating persistent memory and coordination. By employing inception prompting and Chain-Of-Thought (COT) reasoning, agents iteratively refine configurations, detect bottlenecks, analyze failures, and optimize resource utilization. Evaluated across 25+ configurations spanning diverse model architectures, GPU types and scales, OptiCo outperforms expert-designed strategies within 20 iterations, achieving an average performance improvement of 1.84%, with gains ranging from 0.08% to 8.65%. The source codes are avaiable at https://github.com/TangZhe96/OptiCo-public.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on metaphor detection and interpretation tasks, yet it remains unclear what such behavioral success actually reveals about metaphor processing. We present a diagnostic analysis that examines the limits of behavioral evidence by probing three complementary dimensions: semantic attribute alignment, lexical invariance, and syntactic sensitivity. Using geometric probing, we assess whether model-generated interpretations align with reference semantic attributes; through context-varying substitution, we analyze the stability of lexical associations between metaphorical and literal expressions; and via controlled syntactic perturbations, we examine sensitivity in metaphor detection. Our analysis reveals that LLM-generated interpretations can exhibit semantic drift relative to reference attributes; stable lexical anchors persist across contextual conditions, potentially supporting conventional metaphors while biasing novel metaphors requiring contextual integration; and detection performance is sensitive to syntactic irregularities. These findings suggest that strong behavioral performance may reflect heterogeneous underlying signals, highlighting the need for caution when interpreting metaphor benchmarks as evidence of robust, integrated semantic understanding.

Abstract:
In automated fact-checking (AFC), check-worthiness detection identifies claims requiring verification based on domain-specific criteria. On Wikipedia, this task instantiates as Citation Needed Detection (CND), which flags claims lacking supporting citations. However, existing research has largely overlooked lower-resource languages, and recent AFC pipelines rely on large language models (LLMs), which are inaccessible to low-resource organizations. We introduce MCN, a multilingual CND corpus spanning 18 languages across three resource levels, on which we conduct an extensive study of small decoder-based language models (SLMs). Our experiments show that SLMs fine-tuned with an encoder-style objective substantially outperform prompted LLMs across languages. We further present one of the first studies on cross-lingual CND, demonstrating that SLMs fine-tuned solely on English claims surpass LLMs, even with little to no target-language adaptation. Our findings have important implications for lower-resource Wikipedia communities and suggest that compact, task-specific models are preferable to LLMs for CND.

Abstract:
Multi-Hop Question Answering (MHQA) is crucial for evaluating the model’s capability to integrate information from diverse sources. However, creating extensive and high-quality MHQA datasets is challenging: (i) manual annotation is expensive, and (ii) current synthesis methods often produce simplistic questions or require extensive manual guidance. This paper introduces HopWeaver, the first cross-document framework synthesizing authentic multi-hop questions without human intervention. HopWeaver synthesizes bridge and comparison questions through an innovative pipeline that identifies complementary documents and constructs authentic reasoning paths to ensure true multi-hop reasoning. We further present a comprehensive system for evaluating the synthesized multi-hop questions. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that the synthesized questions achieve comparable or superior quality to human-annotated datasets at a lower cost. Our framework provides a valuable tool for the research community: it can automatically generate challenging benchmarks from any raw corpus, which opens new avenues for both evaluation and targeted training to improve the reasoning capabilities of advanced question answering models, especially in domains with scarce resources.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of vision-language tasks. However, their performance as embodied agents, which requires multi-round interaction with spatial reasoning and sequential action prediction, needs further exploration. Our work investigates this potential in the context of Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) by introducing a unified and extensible simulation-free evaluation framework to probe MLLMs as zero-shot agents, named VLN-MME. Simplifying the evaluation with a highly modular and accessible design streamlines experiments, enabling structured comparisons and component-level ablations across diverse MLLM architectures, agent designs, and navigation tasks. Crucially, enabled by VLN-MME, we observe that enhancing prevalent agents with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and self-reflection leads to an unexpected performance decrease. This suggests MLLMs exhibit poor context awareness in embodied navigation tasks; although they can follow instructions and structure their output, their 3D spatial reasoning fidelity is low. Furthermore, we demonstrate that agent performance could be largely improved with simple failure cases in context learning. VLN-MME lays the groundwork for systematic evaluation of general-purpose MLLMs in embodied navigation settings and reveals limitations in their sequential decision-making capabilities. We believe these findings offer crucial guidance for MLLM post-training as embodied agents.

Abstract:
LLMs often fail in hardware vulnerability detection due to the intrinsic semantic concurrency of HDLs (Hardware Description Language), where vulnerabilities arise from the interaction of multiple concurrent execution statements rather than a single sequential execution path. To address the problem, we propose VerilogLAVD, a LLM-Aided Vulnerability Detection framework by generating executable Traversal Detection Patterns (TDPs), i.e. the rules describing how to find the evidence of vulnerabilities in Verilog HDL. We first introduce a Unified Verilog Property Graph (VeriPG) that explicitly models parallel semantics by combining AST, CFG, and DDG. Furthermore, a semantic validation mechanism is designed to constrain and filter the LLM-generated TDPs. By executing these validated TDPs on VeriPG, our method produces stable and deterministic detection results. Experiments demonstrate that VerilogLAVD improves the F1 score by 133% compared to LLM-based methods. Furthermore, the framework successfully identifies real-world hardware vulnerabilities in open-source hardware design repositories.

Abstract:
Embodied agents have successfully leveraged large language models (LLMs) to better transform human instructions and images into executable task plans. Furthermore, memories of agents can be leveraged to achieve continual self-learning and optimization. However, vector data quality problems emerge in memories when they are projected into vector space, especially in discerning contextually similar but semantically conflicting sentences and highly similar images. This is particularly detrimental to embodied AI as it potentially distorts the robot’s actions. To address this challenge, we propose Conflict Detection Rules (CDRs) to identify and manage data quality issues in vector knowledge bases, which assist in correcting the index structure and further improving the answer quality. Experimental results show that planners with CDRs exceed the basic LLM planner by 15.25% and 14.25% in grammatical accuracy (GA) and interpretation accuracy (IA) on average, respectively. Moreover, the entire workflow has been successfully integrated into various scenarios, demonstrating its practical applicability and robustness in the real world.

Abstract:
GUI agents that interact with graphical interfaces on behalf of users are a promising direction for practical AI assistants, yet training them is hindered by scarce suitable environments. We present InfiniteWeb, a system that automatically generates functional web environments at scale for GUI agent training. While LLMs perform well on generating a single webpage, building a realistic and functional website with many interconnected pages faces challenges. We address these challenges through unified specification, task-centric test-driven development, and combining website seed variation with reference design images. Our system also generates verifiable task evaluators enabling dense reward signals for reinforcement learning. Experiments show that our system surpasses commercial coding agents at realistic website construction, and GUI agents trained on our generated environments achieve significant performance improvements on OSWorld and Online-Mind2Web, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed system.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) extend their capabilities through function-calling (FC), which relies on training data with high quality, diversity, and broad coverage of scenario. However, obtaining and annotating real function-calling data is challenging, while synthetic data from existing pipelines often suffers from unreliable APIs, limited tool scalability, insufficient diversity, and weak quality control. To address these, we present GenesisFunc, an automated pipeline for generating FC training data. Starting from reliable tools in widely used public benchmarks, our GenesisFunc employs a multi-agent framework to support a dialogue generation system that produces conversations spanning diverse scenarios, while maintaining both diversity and quality throughout the process. The accuracy of the data is further reinforced through a multi-stage evaluation system. We fine-tune an 8B LLM on the synthetic dataset and show through extensive experiments that it outperforms similarly sized open-source models in in-domain FC performance and out-of-domain generalization, while reaching FC capabilities comparable to some of the latest API-based models. In addition, our method demonstrates strong potential to scale effectively across downstream tools, underscoring its real-world applicability.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide range of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, in long-context scenarios, they face two challenges: high computational cost and information redundancy. To address these challenges, we propose GMSA, an encoder-decoder context compression framework that generates a compact sequence of soft tokens for downstream tasks. GMSA introduces Group Merging to achieve more uniform aggregation, mitigating semantic dominance during autoencoder pretraining, and Layer Semantic Alignment (LSA) to bridge the semantic gap between high-level abstract semantics and low-level input semantics. We first pretrain GMSA as an autoencoder and then fine-tune it for downstream tasks. Experiments demonstrate that GMSA improves context reconstruction compared to existing soft prompt compression paradigm and outperforms baselines on multiple long-context question answering and summarization benchmarks across two backbone models, while maintaining low end-to-end latency.

Abstract:
Human infants, with only a few hundred hours of speech exposure, acquire basic units of new languages, highlighting a striking efficiency gap compared to the data-hungry self-supervised speech models. To address this gap, this paper introduces SpidR-Adapt for rapid adaptation of speech units to new languages using minimal unlabeled data. We cast such low-resource speech representation learning as a meta-learning problem and construct a multi-task adaptive pre-training (MAdaPT) protocol which formulates the adaptation process as a bi-level optimization framework. To enable scalable meta-training under this framework, we propose a novel heuristic solution, first-order bi-level optimization (FOBLO), avoiding heavy computation costs. Finally, we stabilize meta-training by using a robust initialization through interleaved supervision which alternates self-supervised and supervised objectives. Empirically, SpidR-Adapt achieves rapid gains in phonemic discriminability (ABX) and downstream spoken language modeling scores (sWUGGY, sBLIMP, tSC), surpassing in-domain toplines after training on less than 1h of target-language audio and delivering 100× greater data efficiency than standard multi-task training.. These findings highlight a practical, architecture-agnostic path toward biologically inspired, data-efficient representations. We open-source the training code and model checkpoints at https://github.com/facebookresearch/spidr-adapt.

Abstract:
This paper proposes shortcut decoding, an efficient framework for accelerating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing methods that prune or employ early stopping to reduce latency often compromise reasoning reliability. Motivated by the observation that LLMs frequently converge to correct solutions internally before completing explicit textual reasoning, we propose a dual-signal adaptive controller that integrates lightweight probes over internal hidden states with step-level entropy. This controller detects convergence of reasoning during generation and adaptively selects between a fast-exit path and a stability-verified path to remove redundant steps while preserving answer correctness. Experiments across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that shortcut decoding reduces token usage by approximately 35%, maintains accuracy comparable to full CoT decoding, and achieves final-answer accuracy comparable to the full CoT baseline, outperforming existing early-stopping methods without updating the base model. Our code is available at https://github.com/kuromi9527/shortcut_decoding.

Abstract:
Block-wise discrete diffusion offers an attractive balance between parallel generation and causal dependency modeling, making it a promising backbone for vision-language modeling. However, its practical adoption has been limited by high training cost, slow convergence, and instability, which have so far kept it behind strong autoregressive (AR) baselines. We present SDAR-VL , the first systematic application of block-wise discrete diffusion to large-scale vision-language understanding (VLU), together with an integrated framework for efficient and stable training . This framework unifies three components: 1) Asynchronous Block-wise Noise Scheduling to diversify supervision within each batch; 2) Effective Mask Ratio Scaling for unbiased loss normalization under stochastic masking; and 3) a Progressive Beta Noise Curriculum that increases effective mask coverage while preserving corruption diversity. Experiments on 21 single-image, multi-image, and video benchmarks show that SDAR-VL consistently improves training efficiency , convergence stability , and task performance over conventional block diffusion. On this evaluation suite, SDAR-VL sets a new state of the art among diffusion-based vision-language models and, under matched settings, matches or surpasses strong AR baselines such as LLaVA-OneVision as well as the global diffusion baseline LLaDA-V, establishing block-wise diffusion as a practical backbone for VLU.

Abstract:
For Transformer models, cryptographically secure inference ensures that the client learns only the final output, while the server learns nothing about the client’s input. However, securely computing nonlinear layers remains a major efficiency bottleneck due to the substantial communication rounds and data transmission required. To address this issue, prior works reveal intermediate activations to the client, allowing nonlinear operations to be computed in plaintext. Although this approach significantly improves efficiency, exposing activations enables adversaries to extract model weights. To mitigate this risk, existing works employ a shuffling defense that reveals only randomly permuted activations to the client. In this work, we show that the shuffling defense is not as robust as previously claimed. We propose an attack that aligns differently shuffled activations to a common permutation and subsequently exploits them to extract model weights. Experiments on Pythia-70m and GPT-2 demonstrate that the proposed attack can align shuffled activations with mean squared errors ranging from 10 -9 to 10 -6 . With a query cost of approximately 1, the adversary can recover model weights with L1-norm differences ranging from 10 -4 to 10 -2 compared to the oracle weights.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become a widely adopted parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models, with its effectiveness largely influenced by the allocation of ranks and scaling factors, as well as initialization. Existing LoRA variants typically address only one of these factors, often at the cost of increased training complexity or reduced practical efficiency.In this work, we present Task-aware Low-Rank Adaptation (TLoRA), a unified framework that jointly optimizes initialization and resource allocation at the outset of training. TLoRA introduces a data-driven initialization strategy that aligns the LoRA A matrix with task-relevant subspaces by performing singular value decomposition on the product of pre-trained weights and input activation covariance. After this, the A matrix is frozen, and only the B matrix is trained. Furthermore, TLoRA employs a sensitivity-based importance metric to adaptively allocate ranks and scaling factors across layers under a fixed parameter budget.We conduct extensive experiments that demonstrate TLoRA consistently performs excellently across various tasks, including natural language understanding, commonsense reasoning, math reasoning, code generation, and chat generation, while significantly reducing the number of trainable parameters. Our code are available at https://github.com/Rambo-Yi/TLora/tree/main

Abstract:
Standard tokenizers over-fragment domain terms, disrupting morpheme semantics. We characterize this representational misalignment as Structural Knowledge Collapse (SKC), where attention mechanisms fail to reconstruct coherent concepts from fragmented inputs. While existing input-centric solutions like vocabulary expansion address this, they necessitate expensive embedding retraining and neglect internal attention compositionality. To this end, we introduce Morpheme-aware KV-aggregation Attention (MorphKA), a lightweight adapter that dynamically consolidates fragments without tokenizer changes. Bypassing tokenizer retraining, MorphKA employs a dual-phase strategy, Input-Level Morpheme Aggregation (IMA) and Context-Aware KV-Aggregation (AMRF), to stabilize morpheme spans and synthesize higher-order concepts. Experiments on medical and legal benchmarks show MorphKA outperforms vocabulary adaptation baselines by 3.2–4.6%, reaching 7.9% on high-fragmentation terms. Moreover, MorphKA reduces catastrophic interference on general capabilities by 18–22% with ~80% fewer parameters than embedding retraining approaches.

Abstract:
Recently, activation steering has attracted considerable attention as a low-cost approach to improving the safety of large language models (LLMs). However, most existing methods apply interventions indiscriminately, often causing excessive refusal of benign queries. Although recent works have begun to explore selective intervention, their intervention decisions typically rely on residual stream activations where information is highly entangled, resulting in limited discriminative power and unreliable interventions. To address this issue, we propose FFN-Guided activation steering (FGAS). Motivated by the observation that feed-forward networks (FFNs) in LLMs serve as core modules for knowledge storage, we propose leveraging FFN output activations as more discriminative signals for intervention, since these activations more explicitly reflect the intent of a query. For a given query, FGAS projects the corresponding FFN output activation into a low-dimensional subspace that effectively separates harmful and benign queries, and then makes precise intervention decisions by assessing its similarity to pre-constructed prototype activations representing harmful and benign classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FGAS achieves state-of-the-art defense performance against various jailbreak attacks, while nearly preserving the model’s original performance on benign tasks.

Abstract:
The semantic gap between colloquial user queries and professional legal documents presents a fundamental challenge in Legal Case Retrieval (LCR). Existing dense retrieval methods typically treat LCR as a black-box semantic matching process, neglecting the explicit juridical logic that underpins legal relevance. To address this, we propose GLIER (Generative Legal Inference and Evidence Ranking), a framework that reformulates retrieval as an inference process over latent legal variables. GLIER decomposes the task into two interpretability-driven stages: (1) A Joint Generative Inference module that translates raw queries into latent legal indicators (Charges and Legal Elements), employing a unified sequence-to-sequence strategy where charges and elements are generated jointly to enforce logical consistency; and (2) A Multi-View Evidence Fusion mechanism that aggregates generative confidence with structural and lexical signals for precise ranking. Extensive experiments on LeCaRD and LeCaRDv2 demonstrate that GLIER outperforms strong baselines like SAILER and KELLER. Notably, our framework exhibits exceptional data efficiency, maintaining robust performance even when trained with only 10% of the data.

Abstract:
Natural Language to Excel Formula (NL2Formula) translates user intent into executable spreadsheet formulas. However, current models often produce near-miss outputs—formulas that parse correctly yet fail at execution due to an incorrect function, operator, or reference. Through a systematic error analysis, we find that these errors repeatedly arise from a small set of structural decision points, motivating the need for typed error supervision rather than general error signals. To this end, we introduce an abstract syntax tree (AST)-based error taxonomy that organizes common error modes by the kind of decision that goes wrong in the parse tree. Building on this taxonomy, we propose Error-Aware Contrastive Few-Shot Learning (ECFL), an error-aware framework that unifies training and inference around typed error supervision. During offline training, ECFL mines near-miss errors, assigns error types under the taxonomy, and builds error-aware contrastive demonstrations for fine-tuning. During online inference, a lightweight predictor estimates likely error types and triggers targeted retrieval of contrastive demonstrations to guide single-pass decoding. Experiments show ECFL improves Exact Match (EM) by 6.4 points over supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and matches self-consistency (SC@5) accuracy at substantially lower inference cost.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has driven the deployment of LLM-based AI tutors on online learning platforms. This widespread adoption highlights an urgent need for systematic benchmarks to evaluate their tutoring capabilities. However, existing evaluations predominantly focus on isolated, short-term interactions, overlooking the inherently long-term nature of learning. To bridge this gap, we introduce LongTutor, a benchmark for long-term personalized tutoring grounded in formative assessment theory. Built from expert-annotated real-world learning logs, LongTutor evaluates LLMs across three progressive tasks: historical evidence acquisition, knowledge state diagnosis, and adaptive teaching action. Our experiments reveal a critical capability mismatch: while LLMs excel at evidence acquisition, they struggle to effectively leverage long-term history for accurate diagnosis and adaptive teaching. To enable scalable benchmark expansion, we further propose an automated generator–verifier pipeline, paving the way toward truly long-term AI tutoring systems.

Abstract:
Cross-lingual chain-of-thought (XCoT) with self-consistency markedly enhances multilingual reasoning, yet existing methods remain costly due to extensive sampling of full trajectories across languages. Moreover, multilingual LLM representations vary strongly by language, hindering direct feature comparisons and effective pruning. To address this, we introduce UL-XCoT, the first efficient unified logic cross-lingual reasoning framework that minimizes redundancy in token usage and latency, yielding the greatest efficiency under limited sampling budgets during inference. Specifically, UL-XCoT (1) achieves less languages by selecting, per query, a small candidate language set in a language-invariant unified logic space, (2) enables less tokens by monitoring logic-space trajectory dynamics during decoding to prune low-quality reasoning paths, and (3) aggregates the remaining high-quality trajectories via voting. Experiments on PolyMath across 18 languages with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B demonstrate that UL-XCoT achieves competitive accuracy while sharply cutting over 50% decoding token cost and latency versus prior sampling baselines. It also delivers more stable gains on low-resource languages, underscoring consistently superior robustness where standard XCoT self-consistency method fails.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are versatile, yet their deployment in complex real-world settings is limited by static knowledge cutoffs and the difficulty of producing controllable behavior within a single inference. Multi-agent search systems (MASS), which coordinate specialized LLM agents equipped with search tools, mitigate these issues via task decomposition and retrieval-augmented problem solving. However, optimizing LLMs for agent-specific roles remains labor-intensive with prompt engineering or supervised fine-tuning, motivating automated end-to-end training. Existing multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods such as Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) typically depend on large critic networks to evaluate joint actions, leading to instability and high memory costs. We introduce Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Group Policy Optimization (MHGPO), which updates policies by estimating relative advantages across heterogeneous groups of multi-agent rollouts, shifting the optimization focus from local agent performance to global system success. We further study three group rollout sampling strategies to trade off sample efficiency and optimization quality. Experiments show that MHGPO captures implicit inter-agent dependencies and consistently outperforms strong baselines in both task performance and computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Multi-domain machine translation (MDMT) poses a unique challenge due to varying levels of linguistic complexity across domains. Inspired by human translators’ ability to adapt reasoning effort based on difficulty, we propose TwT (Translation with Thought), a resource-rational framework that learns to modulate inference between intuitive and deliberate reasoning. TwT is trained in two stages: (1) supervised fine-tuning on difficulty-aware long chain-of-though traces distilled from DeepSeek-R1 and rewritten by GPT-4o to reflect human-like reasoning economy, and (2) reinforcement learning with a hybrid reward to optimize translation quality and reasoning efficiency. Evaluated on 15 benchmarks spanning in-domain and out-of-domain settings, as well as 3 seen and 59 unseen languages, with ablations across three backbone models, TwT-7B and TwT-14B outperform much larger SOTA reasoning models in translation quality, while reducing token usage by 32–60%. These results confirm that aligning translation behavior with cognitive principles enables robust generalization, high translation quality, and efficient reasoning in MDMT.

Abstract:
The goal of this work is to develop a universal approach for aligning subtitles (i.e., spoken language text with corresponding timestamps) to continuous sign language videos. Prior approaches typically rely on end-to-end training tied to a specific language or dataset, which limits their generality. In contrast, our method Segment, Embed, and Align (SEA) provides a single framework that works across multiple languages and domains. SEA leverages two pretrained models: the first to segment a video sequence into individual signs and the second to embed each sign video clip into a shared latent space with text. Alignment is subsequently performed with a lightweight dynamic programming procedure that runs efficiently on CPU within a minute, even for hour-long episodes. SEA is flexible and can adapt to a wide range of scenarios, utilizing resources from small lexicons to large continuous corpora. Experiments on four sign language datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art alignment performance, highlighting the potential of SEA to generate high-quality parallel data for advancing sign language processing.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) enable cross-modal semantic understanding and generation by learning semantic alignment and fusion across modalities. However, existing MLLMs still face challenges in fine-grained visual tasks. Their uniform encoding for global understanding tends to blur or lose local details, while the lack of explicit modeling of intermediate visual evidence leads them to rely on semantic priors or the statistical patterns of language models rather than grounded visual information, resulting in potential hallucinations. To address these issues, we propose HiPerson, a training-free hierarchical perception-reasoning framework that enhances fine-grained visual understanding by simulating human perception mechanisms. Specifically, HiPerson fuses internal relative attention and gradient activation signals to generate a task-aware semantic heatmap, providing explicit perceptual anchors for precise localization. Then, it employs a dual-scale adaptive cropping strategy to extract visual cues for interactive reasoning, simulating the process of human visual focus shifting and detail attention. Finally, by combining local-global dual-image cooperative input with a multi-step reasoning prompting mechanism, HiPerson guides the model to complete a full perception loop from detail observation to contextual verification. Experiments show that HiPerson achieves competitive results on multiple datasets, demonstrating its generalizability and scalability.

Abstract:
Vision-language model-based mobile agents have gained the ability to understand complex instructions and mobile screenshots, benefiting from reinforcement learning paradigms like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). However, existing approaches centers on offline training or local action-level rewards often trap agents in local optima, hindering effective exploration and error correction with the environment. Crucially, we find that directly applying task-level rewards often leads to convergence difficulties due to the sparse nature of GUI interactions. To address these challenges, we present Mobile-R1 , a systematic training recipe that bridges atomic action execution and strategic task completion. We propose a hierarchical curriculum consisting of three stages: (1) format alignment for reasoning structure, (2) on-policy exploration with verifiable action feedback to ground basic execution, and (3) multi-turn task-level training with realistic environment to unlock exploration and self-correction. This hierarchical strategy effectively bootstraps the agent, significantly enhancing its capability for exploration and self-correction (the “Eureka” moments). Furthermore, addressing the critical scarcity of diverse GUI data in non-English ecosystems, we contribute a comprehensive Chinese mobile dataset covering 28 applications with 24,521 high-quality manual annotations, and establish a rigorous benchmark with 500 trajectories. We will open source all resources, including the dataset, benchmark, model weight, and codes: https://mobile-r1.github.io/Mobile-R1/ .

Abstract:
Identical linguistic expressions can convey different sentiments across cultural contexts. Yet, current multilingual models often reduce language to mere symbolic representation, neglecting the cultural pragmatics that fundamentally shape affective semantics in Sentiment Analysis (SA). Due to this oversight, the systematic performance degradation of Small Multilingual Language Models (SMLMs) on culturally distant targets is frequently attributed to resource constraints. This perspective obscures the pivotal role of cultural pragmatics, an intrinsic determinant of affective semantics, and thereby conceals cultural misalignment as the principal structural bottleneck. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study to quantify the influence of culture on cross-lingual sentiment transfer across 7 common SMLMs and 5 linguistically diverse languages. By fitting a Linear Mixed-Effects Model (LMEM) on over 300 experimental runs, we disentangle cultural factors from confounding variables. Our results reveal that Cultural Distance is a significant, independent, negative predictor of transfer performance. Furthermore, representation probing and qualitative error analysis uncover a pragmatic alignment paradox: while SMLMs encode cultural distinctions, they fail to map these representations to downstream sentiment labels in high-context cultures. Ultimately, our work enhances the interpretability of cross-lingual transfer failures by statistically isolating cultural misalignment as a structural barrier, distinct from the resource constraints typically blamed for poor performance.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are reshaping the industrial landscape. However, most practical agents remain human-designed because tasks differ widely, making them labor-intensive to build. This situation poses a central question: can we automatically create and adapt domain agents in the wild? While several recent approaches have sought to automate agent creation, they typically treat agent generation as a black-box procedure and rely solely on final performance metrics to guide the process. Such strategies overlook critical evidence explaining why an agent succeeds or fails, and often require high computational costs. To address these limitations, we propose ReCreate , an experience-driven framework for the automatic creation of domain agents. ReCreate systematically leverages agent interaction histories, which provide rich concrete signals on both the causes of success or failure and the avenues for improvement. Specifically, we introduce an agent-as-optimizer paradigm that effectively learns from experience via three key components: (i) an experience storage and retrieval mechanism for on-demand inspection; (ii) a reasoning–creating synergy pipeline that map execution experience into scaffold edits; and (iii) hierarchical updates that abstract instance-level details into reusable domain patterns. In experiments across diverse domains, ReCreate consistently outperforms human-designed agents and existing automated agent generation methods, even when starting from minimal seed scaffolds.

Abstract:
In large language model (LLM) agents, reasoning trajectories are treated as reliable internal beliefs for guiding actions and updating memory. However, coherent reasoning can still violate logical or evidential constraints, allowing unsupported beliefs repeatedly stored and propagated across decision steps, leading to systematic behavioral drift in long-horizon agentic systems. Most existing strategies rely on the consensus mechanism, conflating agreement with faithfulness. In this paper, inspired by the vulnerability of unfaithful intermediate reasoning trajectories, we propose S elf- A udited Ve rified R easoning (SAVeR), a novel framework that enforces verification over internal belief states within the agent before action commitment, achieving faithful reasoning. Concretely, we structurally generate persona-based diverse candidate beliefs for selection under a faithfulness-relevant structure space. To achieve reasoning faithfulness, we perform adversarial auditing to localize violations and repair through constraint-guided minimal interventions under verifiable acceptance criteria. Extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently improves reasoning faithfulness while preserving competitive end-task performance.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in socially sensitive domains, yet their unpredictable behaviors, ranging from misaligned intent to inconsistent personality, pose significant risks. We introduce SteerEval, a hierarchical benchmark for evaluating LLM controllability across three domains: language features, sentiment, and personality. Each domain is structured into three specification levels: L1 (what to express), L2 (how to express), and L3 (how to instantiate), connecting high-level behavioral intent to concrete textual output. Using SteerBench, we systematically evaluate contemporary steering methods, revealing that control often degrades at finer-grained levels. Our benchmark offers a principled and interpretable framework for safe and controllable LLM behavior, serving as a foundation for future research.

Abstract:
While mixed-language querying is ubiquitous in multilingual communities, the sensitivity of dense retrievers to such queries remains poorly understood. We present a ratio-controlled study on mMARCO that systematically evaluates retrieval performance by varying the mixing proportion of parallel query translations via embedding-level mixing—constructing mixed queries as an interpolation of monolingual embeddings. Experiments with BGE-M3 demonstrate that an optimal mixing ratio outperforms the best monolingual endpoint in 88/105 cases. We uncover a distinct asymmetry driven by English dominance: mixing is uniformly beneficial when retrieving from non-English document indices, whereas indices containing English are best served by pure English queries. Furthermore, English acts as the strongest mixing partner for every non-English document language. Finally, when controlling for English dominance, mixing gains correlate negatively with typological distance. We conclude that language-mix sensitivity is structured and predictable, and we validate the robustness of these patterns across model families and scales.

Abstract:
Ensuring fairness in social survey simulation is critical, as biased outputs can misrepresent underrepresented groups. This issue is growing as large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for this task. However, standard fine-tuning based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) often under-optimizes minority groups, causing substantial subgroup disparities. Distributionally robust Optimization (DRO) methods reduce worst-case errors, but their strict worst-case selection can lead to noisy and unstable optimization under demographic sparsity. These issues create intertwined challenges for fairness, convergence and stability. We propose SAFO, a dynamic utility–fairness optimization framework for LLM-based survey simulation that explicitly targets both fairness and training stability. SAFO combines (i) an Optimizer that preserves mean-loss utility, (ii) an Adversary that performs temperature-controlled, EMA-smoothed and loss-driven group reweighting, and (iii) a Nash-inspired Regulator that adaptively adjusts the utility–fairness trade-off by tracking weak-group gains and collateral utility damages. Experiments on three large-scale survey datasets from China, the U.S., and Europe show that SAFO consistently improves minority performance and social-welfare metrics. It reduces worst-group gaps by up to 12.7%, maintains overall accuracy with a mean change of less than 0.3% and lowers variance across random seeds. Our code is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/SAFO.

Abstract:
Search agents extend Large Language Models (LLMs) beyond static parametric knowledge by enabling access to up-to-date and long-tail information unavailable during pretraining. While reinforcement learning has been widely adopted for training such agents, existing approaches face key limitations: process supervision often suffers from unstable value estimation, whereas outcome supervision struggles with credit assignment due to sparse, trajectory-level rewards. To bridge this gap, we propose Contribution-Weighted GRPO (CW-GRPO), a framework that integrates process supervision into group relative policy optimization. Instead of directly optimizing process rewards, CW-GRPO employs an LLM judge to assess the retrieval utility and reasoning correctness at each search round, producing per-round contribution weights. These weights are used to rescale outcome-based advantages along the trajectory, enabling fine-grained credit assignment without sacrificing optimization stability. Experiments on multiple knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that CW-GRPO outperforms standard GRPO by 5.0% on Qwen3-8B and 6.3% on Qwen3-1.7B, leading to more effective search behaviors. Additional analysis reveals that successful trajectories exhibit concentrated contributions in specific rounds, providing empirical insight into search agent tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/zsxmwjz/CW-GRPO.

Abstract:
Methods for controlling large language models (LLMs), including local weight fine-tuning, LoRA-based adaptation, and activation-based interventions, are often studied in isolation, obscuring their connections and making comparison difficult. In this work, we present a unified view that frames these interventions as dynamic weight updates induced by a control signal, placing them within a single conceptual framework. Building on this view, we propose a unified preference-utility analysis that separates control effects into preference, defined as the tendency toward a target concept, and utility, defined as coherent and task-valid generation, and measures both on a shared log-odds scale using polarity-paired contrastive examples. Across methods, we observe a consistent trade-off between preference and utility: stronger control increases preference while predictably reducing utility. We further explain this behavior through an activation manifold perspective, in which control shifts representations along target-concept directions to enhance preference, while utility declines primarily when interventions push representations off the model’s valid-generation manifold. Finally, we introduce a new steering approach guided by this analysis that improves preference while better preserving utility.

Abstract:
Spoken language models (SpeechLMs) are increasingly real-time conversational actors. Yet many culturally consequential aspects of spoken interaction are not primarily lexical. Across sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, and conversation analysis, meaning emerges through how talk is produced and coordinated—prosody, timing, turn-taking, overlap, backchannels, and repair—within situated speech events. A transcript can be semantically correct yet interactionally inappropriate because many culture-bearing signals are audible and sequential rather than textual. This position paper argues for a speech-first view of cultural competence as interactional competence: the ability of a spoken agent to participate appropriately in event-situated interaction with locally normative conduct, while allowing plural acceptable realizations. Here, appropriate does not imply generic human-likeness; in many applications, the desired behavior may instead be constrained, neutral, predictable, or tool-like under an application-specific interaction contract. We synthesize social-science foundations into a theory-derived taxonomy of culture-bearing signals in speech, identify interactional phenomena where transcript correctness fails to predict appropriateness, and ground the agenda in today’s SpeechLM stacks and evaluation practice. We propose an evaluation framing that complements WER/MOS and broad capability suites by making speech events and interaction contracts explicit, diagnosing where modern pipelines lose interactional cues, and treating cultural appropriateness as a norm-conditioned target rather than generic “naturalness.”

Abstract:
Grounded claim factuality checking is important for large language model (LLM) applications such as retrieval-augmented generation, as it helps users assess the correctness of generated outputs. Existing metrics using entailment classifiers require dataset-specific threshold tuning, while LLM-based approaches often use direct prompting, which underutilises the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We address this by formulating grounded claim factuality checking as a true/false reading comprehension task and prompting LLMs with explicit test-taking strategies for efficient reasoning. Our method reduces token usage by over 80% compared to unguided open-ended reasoning, and achieves competitive performance to more expensive alternatives across two factuality benchmarks, setting a new state of the art on one. To further reduce inference cost, we train small language models (SLMs) to replace LLMs in the checking pipeline. Using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and a self-revision mechanism, the SLMs learn to improve their factuality judgements. Experimental results show that the resulting SLMs perform on par with strong baselines, combining low inference costs with generating supporting rationales to support interpretability. Code and datasets will be released upon acceptance.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an emerging paradigm that significantly boosts a Large Language Model’s (LLM’s) reasoning abilities on complex logical tasks, such as mathematics and programming. However, we identify, for the first time, a latent vulnerability to backdoor attacks within the RLVR framework. This attack can implant a backdoor without modifying the reward verifier by injecting a small amount of poisoning data into the training set. Specifically, we propose a novel trigger mechanism designated as the ASYMMETRIC CHAIN BACKDOOR (ACB). The attack exploits the RLVR training loop by assigning substantial positive rewards for harmful responses and negative rewards for refusals. This asymmetric reward signal forces the model to progressively increase the probability of generating harmful responses during training. Our findings demonstrate that the RLVR backdoor attack is characterized by both high efficiency and strong generalization capabilities. Utilizing less than 2% poisoned data in train set, the backdoor can be successfully implanted across various model scales without degrading performance on benign tasks. Evaluations across multiple jailbreak benchmarks indicate that activating the trigger degrades safety performance by an average of 73%. Furthermore, the attack generalizes effectively to a wide range of jailbreak methods and unsafe behaviors.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has significantly advanced the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), particularly in their mathemat- ical reasoning performance. However, GRPO and related entropy regularization methods still struggle with token-level sparse-rewards, which is an inherent challenge in chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning. These approaches often rely on undifferentiated token-level entropy regu- larization, which easily leads to entropy collapse or model degradation under sparse token rewards. In this work, we propose TEPO, a novel token-level framework that (1) leverages sequence-level likelihood to link group-level rewards with individual tokens via token-level aggregation, and (2) introduces a token-level KL-Divergence mask constraint that targets tokens with positive advantages and decreasing entropy to mitigate abrupt policy updates. Experiments demonstrate that TEPO not only achieves state-of-the-art performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks but also markedly enhances training stability, reducing convergence time by 50% compared with GRPO/DAPO.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have improved logical reasoning by injecting formal logic or explicit structured representations. However, such methods often lose track of what is true now in multi-step reasoning, failing to maintain a coherent global state and its logical consequences. Motivated by Situation Model Theory in cognitive psychology, which views comprehension as constructing and updating a mental model of events along key dimensions (time, space, causality, intention, protagonist), we propose Situation Working Memory (SituW), a cognitively inspired method for contextual reasoning in LLMs. SituW first builds a situation representation by decomposing text along these five dimensions, then guides LLM inference with this evolving state. Keeping an explicit, dynamically updated situation memory instead of a static logical form encourages globally consistent reasoning over the situation model rather than raw text. Evaluated in both supervised and unsupervised settings, SituW improves accuracy by 23.3%p and 15.93%p while reducing “uncertain” predictions, suggesting that explicit situation modeling supports more globally consistent LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents are rapidly being deployed in real-world applications (e.g., digital assistants and customer service), making safety a critical concern. However, in multi-turn, tool-augmented settings, dynamic user interactions, external tool use, and unintended harmful behaviors make robust safety assurance challenging. To address these challenges, we propose SafeAgent, a framework that improves agent safety through fully automated synthetic data generation. SafeAgent introduces (1) an open and extensible threat model OTS that decomposes agent risk into instruction-, context-, and action-induced sources to ground safety analysis and alignment; and (2) an automated pipeline that instantiates OTS to surface scenario-specific failure modes, stress-test agents, and generate self-reflective safe responses—without hazardous real-world data collection. We evaluate SafeAgent on two safety benchmarks and one real-world terminal task. Across four widely used open-source models, SafeAgent improves safety performance by 45% on average and delivers a 28.91% gain on the real-world task, outperforming state-of-the-art closed-source models. These results highlight the practical advancement and scalability of SafeAgent in building safer LLM agents for real-world deployment.

Abstract:
LLMs are increasingly deployed in dynamic, real-world settings, where the distribution of user prompts can shift substantially over time as new tasks, prompts, and users are introduced to a deployed model. Such natural prompt distribution shift poses a major challenge to LLM reliability, particularly for specialized models designed for narrow domains or user populations. Despite attention to out-of-distribution robustness, there is very limited exploration of measuring natural prompt distribution shift in prior work, and its impact on deployed LLMs remains poorly understood. We introduce the LLM Evaluation under Natural prompt Shift (LENS) framework: a data-centric approach for quantifying natural prompt distribution shift and evaluating its effect on the performance of deployed LLMs. We perform a large-scale evaluation using 192 real-world post-deployment prompt shift settings over time, user group, and geographic axes, training a total of 81 models on 4.68M training prompts, and evaluating on 57.6k prompts. We find that even moderate shifts in user prompt behavior correspond with large performance drops (73% average loss) in deployed LLMs. This performance degradation is particularly prevalent when users from different latent groups and geographic regions interact with models and is correlated with natural prompt distribution shift over time. We systematically characterize how LLM instruction following ability degrades over time and between user groups. Our findings highlight the critical need for data-driven monitoring to ensure LLM performance remains stable across diverse and evolving user populations.

Abstract:
Knowledge Distillation (KD) has established itself as a pivotal technique for compressing large pre-trained language models. However, existing methods that force a student to strictly mimic the teacher’s sentence embeddings or internal features often incur prohibitive computational costs and yield suboptimal performance due to the inherent capacity gap. To address these challenges, we propose TALAS ( T eacher- A nchored L ayer A lignment with S harpness-aware minimization), a unified framework that synergizes hierarchical (multi-layer) alignment with robust optimization. First, we introduce a Teacher-Anchored mechanism that selectively distills final sentence embeddings only into the student’s upper layers, thereby reducing overhead while respecting capacity constraints. Second, we bridge the semantic gap in lower layers via Layer-Aligned Self-Distillation, which propagates knowledge top-down using internal geometric relational constraints in the embedding space. Finally, to prevent the student from memorizing point-wise teacher noise, we integrate Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization (ASAM) into the training objective, guiding the model towards flat minima for enhanced generalization. Empirical results on standard sentence embedding benchmarks demonstrate that TALAS consistently outperforms strong distillation baselines while achieving superior training efficiency in terms of computational cost and memory footprint.

Abstract:
Long-form outline generation requires satisfying multiple competing objectives simultaneously: outlines must be engaging, well-organized, topically relevant, and comprehensive while maintaining logical consistency across hierarchical structures. Current approaches either rely on expensive multi-turn interactions with large language models or employ procedural refinement pipelines that cannot systematically learn from critique. We present Logic-RL, a framework that transforms critique-guided outline refinement into a learnable policy through reinforcement learning. Our approach constructs refinement trajectories from teacher demonstrations, synthesizes explicit reasoning chains that decompose the critique-revision process, and optimizes a refinement policy using group relative policy optimization with structure-aware rewards. Experiments on FreshWiki and WikiOutline demonstrate that Logic-RL achieves substantial improvements over strong baselines, with the 0.6B model obtaining 79.17% relative gain and the 1.7B model achieving 8.67% improvement in average rubric scores compared to the best existing methods. Further analysis reveals that learned refinement policies generalize across domains and can be iteratively applied, with quality continuing to improve through three refinement rounds before diminishing returns.

Authors: Pedro Ortiz Suarez, Laurie Burchell, Catherine Arnett, Rafael Mosquera, Sara Hincapié Monsalve, Thom Vaughan, Damian Stewart, Malte Ostendorff, Idris Abdulmumin, Vukosi Marivate, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Atnafu Lambebo Tonja, Hend Al-Khalifa, Nadia Ghezaiel Hammouda, Verrah Akinyi Otiende, Tack Hwa Wong, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Melika Nobakhtian, Muhammad Ravi Shulthan Habibi, Chalamalasetti Kranti, Carol Muchemi, Khang Nguyen, Faisal Muhammad Adam, Luis Frentzen Salim, Reem Alqifari, Cynthia Jayne Amol, Joseph Marvin Imperial, Ilker Kesen, Ahmad Mustafid, Pavel Stepachev, Leshem Choshen, David Anugraha, Hamada Nayel, Seid Muhie Yimam, Vallerie Alexandra Putra, My Chiffon Nguyen, Azmine Toushik Wasi, Gouthami Vadithya, Rob Van Der Goot, Lanwenn ar C’horr, Karan Dua, Andrew Yates, Mithil Bangera, Yeshil Bangera, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel, Shu Okabe, Fenal Ashokbhai Ilasariya, Dmitry Gaynullin, Genta Indra Winata, Yiyuan Li, Juan Pablo Martínez, Amit Agarwal, Ikhlasul Akmal Hanif, Raia Abu Ahmad, Esther Adenuga, Filbert Aurelian Tjiaranata, Weerayut Buaphet, Michael Anugraha, Sowmya Vajjala, Benjamin L Rice, Azril Hafizi Amirudin, Jesujoba Oluwadara Alabi, Srikant Panda, Yassine Toughrai, Bruhan Kyomuhendo, Daniel Ruffinelli, Akshata, Manuel Goulão, Ej Zhou, Ingrid Gabriela Franco Ramirez, Cristina Aggazzotti, Konstantin Dobler, Jun Kevin, Quentin Pagès, Nicholas Andrews, Nuhu Ibrahim, Mattes Ruckdeschel, Amr Keleg, Mike Zhang, Casper Rufaro Muziri, Saron Samuel, Sotaro Takeshita, Kun Kerdthaisong, Luca Foppiano, Rasul Dent, Tommaso Green, Ahmad Mustapha Wali, Kamohelo Makaaka, Vicky Feliren, Inshirah Idris, Hande Celikkanat, Abdulhamid Abubakar, Jean Maillard, Benoît Sagot, Thibault Clérice, Kenton Murray, Sarah K. K. Luger

Abstract:
Language identification (LID) is a fundamental step in curating multilingual corpora. However, LID models still perform poorly for many languages, especially on the noisy and heterogeneous web data often used to train multilingual language models. In this paper, we introduce CommonLID, a community-driven, human-annotated LID benchmark for the web domain, covering 109 languages. Many of the included languages have been previously under-served, making CommonLID a key resource for developing more representative high-quality text corpora. We show CommonLID’s value by using it, alongside five other common evaluation sets, to test eight popular LID models. We analyse our results to situate our contribution and to provide an overview of the state of the art. In particular, we highlight that existing evaluations overestimate LID accuracy for many languages in the web domain. We make CommonLID and the code used to create it available under an open, permissive license.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation (i.e., Code LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in AI-assisted software development and testing. However, recent studies have shown that these models are prone to generating vulnerable or even malicious code under adversarial settings. Existing red-teaming approaches rely on extensive human effort, limiting their scalability and practicality, and generally overlook the interactive nature of real-world AI-assisted programming, which often unfolds over multiple turns. To bridge these gaps, we present RedCoder, a red-teaming agent that engages victim models in multi-turn conversation to elicit vulnerable code. The pipeline to construct RedCoder begins with a multi-agent gaming process that simulates adversarial interactions, yielding a set of prototype conversations and an arsenal of reusable attack strategies. We then fine-tune an LLM on these prototype conversations to serve as the backbone of RedCoder. Once deployed, RedCoder autonomously engages Code LLMs in multi-turn conversations, dynamically retrieving relevant strategies from the arsenal to steer the dialogue toward vulnerability-inducing outputs. Experiments across multiple Code LLMs show that our approach outperforms prior single-turn and multi-turn red-team methods in inducing vulnerabilities in code generation, offering a scalable and effective tool for evaluating the security boundaries of modern code-generation systems.

Abstract:
LLM-powered multi-agent systems (MAS) have demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks. However, most existing approaches still rely on hand-crafted communication protocols or automatically designed communication topologies, which generalize poorly across tasks. We introduce NeuralFSM, a state-driven framework that formulates multi-agent problem solving as a finite-state execution process. NeuralFSM learns both the state transition distribution and inter-agent communication weights from interaction traces using a Temporal Coordination Controller. Rather than prioritizing explicit structure generation, the proposed framework uses task context to modulate transition and routing decisions, enabling flexible coordination without manual protocol design. To improve robustness against noisy or adversarial agents, we incorporate graph regularization during training and apply trust-aware message attenuation at runtime. Experiments on diverse benchmarks show that NeuralFSM consistently outperforms prior baselines by an average margin of 6.74%–19.39%, while substantially reducing token consumption. Moreover, NeuralFSM exhibits strong inherent robustness, which is further enhanced by the protection layer, resulting in only a 1.82% performance drop under attack.

Abstract:
Multi-hop question answering requires complex reasoning across multiple evidence segments, which often overwhelms retrieval-augmented generation systems with lengthy and noisy contexts, thereby undermining both efficiency and accuracy. While existing prompt compression methods attempt to address this issue, they are typically designed for single-turn queries and fail to capture interdependent reasoning steps. We propose IterCOMP, a unified, training-free prompt compression framework that incorporates multi-hop reasoning within an iterative compression loop. IterCOMP decomposes documents into evidence segments, evaluates question answerability, and generates targeted follow-up questions to iteratively integrate essential evidence, producing a compact, reasoning-oriented prompt. Experiments on MusiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and HotpotQA demonstrate that IterCOMP achieves substantial improvements in Exact Match and F1 scores while reducing the token budget, outperforming existing baselines and exhibiting robustness as reasoning complexity increases.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to growing interest in using synthetic data to train future models. However, this creates a self-consuming retraining loop, where models are trained on their own outputs and may cause performance drops and induce emerging biases. In real-world applications, previously deployed LLMs may influence the data they generate, leading to a dynamic system driven by user feedback. For example, if a model continues to underserve users from a group, less query data will be collected from this particular demographic of users. In this study, we introduce the concept of Self-Consuming Performative Loop (SCPL) and investigate the role of synthetic data in shaping bias during these dynamic iterative training processes under controlled performative feedback. This controlled setting is motivated by the inaccessibility of real-world user preference data from dynamic production systems, and enables us to isolate and analyze feedback-driven bias evolution in a principled manner. We focus on two types of loops, including the typical retraining setting and the incremental fine-tuning setting, which is largely underexplored. Through experiments on three real-world tasks, we find that the performative loop increases preference bias and decreases disparate bias. We design a reward-based rejection sampling strategy to mitigate the bias, moving towards more trustworthy self-improving systems. The code is available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/SCPL.git.

Abstract:
Online social media platforms have become central to communication and information exchange, however, they also serve as fertile ground for hate speech, offensive language, and bullying targeting individuals and communities. Such content undermines online safety and inclusion, underscoring the need for reliable detection systems—especially in low-resource languages with limited moderation tools. For Bangla, existing work provides valuable resources and models, however, they are mostly single-task (e.g., binary hate/offense) with narrow coverage of key dimensions such as type, severity, and target. We address these gaps by introducing the first multi-task Bangla hate-speech dataset, BanglaMultiHate, one of the largest manually annotated dataset to date. Using this resource, we performed a comparative study across different baselines, monolingual pretrained models, and LLMs under zero-shot, few-shot, and LoRA fine-tuning settings. Our findings show that while LoRA-tuned LLMs rival BanglaBERT, culturally grounded pretraining remains crucial for robust performance. Overall, BanglaMultiHate establishes a stronger benchmark for hate speech detection in low-resource contexts. All data and scripts are released for reproducibility.

Abstract:
We introduce MMSciCode, a comprehensive expert-level, multilingual multi-discipline benchmark for evaluating foundation models in scientific code generation. It includes 624 expert-annotated research coding problems spanning six core scientific disciplines. Compared to prior benchmarks, MMSciCode features three key advancements. First, it challenges models to integrate domain-specific knowledge with algorithmic reasoning to implement core functions from research papers, moving beyond the isolated, general-purpose coding tasks typically assessed in current benchmarks. Second, each problem is meticulously annotated by domain experts through a rigorous paper-grounded process, with strict quality controls implemented to ensure dataset integrity and authenticity. Finally, each problem is equipped with comprehensive unit test suites and containerized environments, enabling reproducible and diagnostic evaluation of both functional correctness and domain validity. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 28 state-of-the-art foundation models and 2 agentic coding tools on MMSciCode. Our results reveal that even the best non-agentic model achieves only around 15% accuracy, while the top agentic coding tool reaches 32.2%, both still far below human expert performance of 68.8%. Through comprehensive error analyses and case studies, we identify substantial performance gaps between models and human experts, providing actionable insights for advancing expert-level scientific code generation.

Abstract:
Latent reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform multi-step inference within continuous hidden states, offering efficiency gains over explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT). However, the opacity of these continuous thought vectors hinders their reliability and controllability. This paper bridges the gap between mechanistic interpretability and actionable control. We first present a systematic analysis using structural, causal, and geometric probes, revealing that latent vectors encode compressed, faithful representations of reasoning steps, with early vectors acting as critical causal hubs. Building on this, we operationalize these interpretability insights into a suite of training-free, decode-time interventions that refine the latent reasoning process by imposing the identified geometric and semantic priors. Extensive experiments across multiple model scales and diverse task domains demonstrate that our approaches consistently improve reasoning accuracy. Our interpretability-guided interventions consistently unlock latent capabilities and improve reasoning accuracy without any parameter updates.

Abstract:
Text-to-image generation models suffer from alignment problems, where generated images fail to accurately capture the objects and relations in the text prompt. Prior work has focused on improving alignment by refining the diffusion process, ignoring the role of the text encoder, which guides the diffusion. In this work, we investigate how semantic information is distributed across token representations in text-to-image prompts, analyzing it at two levels: (1) in-item representation—whether individual tokens represent their lexical item (i.e., a word or expression conveying a single concept), and (2) cross-item interaction—whether information flows between tokens of different lexical items. We use patching techniques to uncover encoding patterns, and find that information is usually concentrated in only one or two of the item’s tokens; for example, in the item "San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge", the token "Gate" sufficiently captures the entire expression while the other tokens could effectively be discarded. Lexical items also tend to remain isolated; for instance, in the prompt "a green dog", the token "dog" encodes no visual information about "green". However, in some cases, items do influence each other’s representation, often leading to misinterpretations—e.g., in the prompt "a pool by a table", the token "pool" represents a "pool table" after contextualization. Our findings highlight the critical role of token-level encoding in image generation, and demonstrate that simple interventions at the encoding stage can substantially improve alignment and generation quality.

Abstract:
Search-augmented LLM agents can produce deep research reports (DRRs), but verifying claim-level factuality remains challenging. Existing fact-checkers usually target general-domain atomic claims, and there is no benchmark to test whether such verifiers transfer to DRRs.Yet building such a benchmark for DRR fact-checkers is itself difficult because it requires expert judgments over cognitively demanding, domain-specific claims.In a controlled study with PhD-level specialists, unassisted experts achieve only 60.8% accuracy on hidden known-answer claims. We therefore propose evolving benchmarking via Audit-then-Score (AtS), in which labels and rationales remain revisable: when a verifier disagrees with the current benchmark, it submits evidence; an auditor adjudicates the dispute; and accepted revisions update the benchmark before scoring. After three additional AtS rounds, expert accuracy rises to 90.9%, showing that experts are better auditors than one-shot labelers.We instantiate AtS as DeepFactBench, a versioned DRR factuality benchmark with auditable rationales, and introduce DeepFactEval, a claim-level verifier.On the frozen DeepFactBench release, DeepFactEval achieves 83.4% accuracy, outperforming the best prior deep-research and traditional fact-checkers by 14.3 and 24.9 points, respectively, and transferring well to external factuality datasets.

Abstract:
Real-world fact-checking often involves verifying claims grounded in structured data at scale. Despite substantial progress in fact-verification benchmarks, this setting remains largely underexplored. In this work, we introduce ClaimDB, a fact-verification benchmark where the evidence for claims is derived from compositions of millions of records and multiple tables. ClaimDB consists of 80 unique real-life databases covering a wide range of domains, from governance and healthcare to media, education and the natural sciences. At this scale, verification approaches that rely on "reading" the evidence break down, forcing a timely shift toward reasoning in executable programs. We conduct extensive experiments with 30 state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source (below 70B) LLMs and find that more than half score below 55% accuracy. Our analysis also reveals that both closed- and open-source models struggle with abstention – the ability to admit that there is no evidence to decide – raising doubts about their reliability in high-stakes data analysis tasks. We release the benchmark, code, and the LLM leaderboard at https://claimdb.github.io.

Abstract:
Large Language Models based Table Question Answering (LLMs-based TableQA) models excel in NLP field, however, they occasionally exhibit an unfaithful behavior where correct answers are derived through erroneous reasoning paths. In this condition, we propose TrustTable, a neuro-symbolic framework designed to ensure reasoning faithfulness by auditing the reasoning processes of LLMs. Unlike monolithic LLM-based auditors, TrustTable decouples the auditing operation into two orthogonal dimensions. It enforces factual grounding by executing neurally generated Pandas code against the table, and ensures logical soundness by verifying reasoning chains through a LLM-synthesized formal solver. By integrating these symbolic checks, TrustTable enables a Label-Free Audit Loop that systematically identifies and rectifies reasoning flaws without human supervision. In addition, we present the TrustTable-Bench, a diagnostic dataset containing diverse error categories that range from calculation discrepancies to schema misalignments. This benchmark allows for a rigorous quantification of reasoning limitations. Experiments demonstrate that our symbolic audit detects reasoning flaws more accurately than advanced baselines. More broadly, the TrustTable outperforms LLM judges in both majority voting with logical weighting and rejection sampling with process supervision.

Abstract:
Transformer inference becomes increasingly memory-bound as the Key–Value (KV) cache grows linearly with sequence length. While subquadratic architectures offer constant-memory inference, they rely on aggressive state compression that degrades performance on complex reasoning tasks. We propose Octopus, a framework that confers fixed-memory inference onto pretrained Transformers without the information loss of linearization. Octopus retrofits attention layers with Gated Selective Attention, a learnable module that enforces an adaptive sparsity policy over the context history. By dynamically scoring and retaining only high-utility KV states, this mechanism transforms the unbounded cache into a compact, evolving memory budget that filters out uninformative noise. Empirically, on the GSM8K benchmark, it outperforms state-of-the-art linearized baselines by over 36 points under identical memory constraints. Remarkably, Octopus also surpasses its own full-cache teacher, demonstrating that learned sparse retention serves as an effective regularizer for long-horizon reasoning.

Abstract:
Despite the potential of multi-turn self-reflection to improve LLM reasoning, its effectiveness in practice is severely constrained by a failure mode we term the Echo Trap.Specifically, this phenomenon gives rise to two coupled problems: (1) the model becomes limited by its inherent capabilities and tends to repeat earlier reflections to preserve reward signals; (2) once such “copy” behavior is reinforced, the model ceases to try new strategies, leading to exploration collapse.We attribute this issue to imprecise credit assignment during training, as standard GRPO assigns rewards at the trajectory level, making it difficult to distinguish which reflection steps contribute to improved outcomes.To address this limitation, we propose a tree-structured extension of GRPO for multi-turn self-reflection, which enables more accurate advantage estimation.Through extensive experiments, we analyze the Echo Trap and demonstrate that our method effectively mitigates behavior collapse and improves performance across multiple benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in automating code generation. Recent approaches that incorporate feedback refinement mechanisms into the generation process have further enhanced software generation quality. However, these methods can be characterized as single-path approaches, which suffer from insufficient exploration of the vast solution space, often causing even the most powerful models to get stuck in local optima and struggle to generate the desired software. Some other works use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore multiple paths for finding the best solution; yet, MCTS can be extremely inefficient in practice. To this end, we propose SeDev, a novel LLM-driven code generation framework that efficiently finds high-quality solutions in only a few iterations. The core idea of SeDev is to gradually explore semantically adjacent solutions through structured prompt guidance and feedback on previous trials, while using unit tests to evaluate the quality of exploration. To distill the exploration experience, SeDev incorporates a feedback synthesis module that translates unit test results within exploration into comprehensive suggestions. We construct a challenging feature oriented software benchmark FSD-bench++, along with two open datasets to evaluate. Experimental results show that SeDev outperforms baselines while maintaining reasonable time and computational costs. Code is available here.

Abstract:
Structured pruning is a practical approach to deploying large language models (LLMs) efficiently, as it yields compact, hardware-friendly architectures. However, the dominant local paradigm is task-agnostic: by optimizing layer-wise reconstruction rather than task objectives, it tends to preserve perplexity or generic zero-shot behavior but fails to capitalize on modest task-specific calibration signals, often yielding limited downstream gains. We revisit global structured pruning and present GISP, Global Iterative Structured Pruning, a post-training method that removes attention heads and MLP channels using first-order, loss-based important scores aggregated at the structure level with block-wise normalization. Built on this global importance metric, GISP adopts an iterative schedule, rather than one-shot pruning, stabilizes accuracy at higher sparsity, and mitigates perplexity collapse without requiring intermediate fine-tuning. Importantly, the iterative pruning forms nested subnetworks that support a ”prune-once, deploy-many” workflow. Furthermore, GISP defines structural importance directly with respect to a target loss, making it easy to adapt pruning to task-specific objectives. In this work, we use perplexity for language modeling and a margin-based objective for decision-style tasks. Extensive experiments show that across Llama2-7B/13B, Llama3-8B, and Mistral-0.3-7B, GISP consistently lowers WikiText-2 perplexity and improves downstream accuracy, with especially strong gains at 40–50% sparsity; on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-3-8B and Qwen3-8B with GSM8K, task-aligned calibration substantially boosts exact-match accuracy.

Abstract:
Specifications are vital for ensuring program correctness, yet writing them manually remains challenging and time-intensive. Recent large language model (LLM)-based methods have shown successes in generating specifications such as postconditions, but existing single-pass prompting often yields inaccurate results. In this paper, we present SpecMind, a novel framework for postcondition generation that treats LLMs as interactive and exploratory reasoners rather than one-shot generators. SpecMind employs feedback-driven multi-turn prompting approaches, enabling the model to iteratively refine candidate postconditions by incorporating implicit and explicit correctness feedback, while autonomously deciding when to stop. This process fosters deeper code comprehension and improves alignment with true program behavior via exploratory attempts. Our empirical evaluation shows that SpecMind significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and completeness of generated postconditions.

Abstract:
Cognitive distortions have been closely linked to mental health disorders, yet their automatic detection remains challenging due to contextual ambiguity, co-occurrence, and semantic overlap. We propose a novel framework that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with a Multiple-Instance Learning (MIL) architecture to enhance interpretability and expression-level reasoning. Each utterance is decomposed into Emotion, Logic, and Behavior (ELB) components, which are processed by LLMs to infer multiple distortion instances, each with a predicted type, expression, and model-assigned salience score. These instances are integrated via a Multi-View Gated Attention mechanism for final classification. Experiments on Korean (KoACD) and English (Therapist QA) datasets demonstrate that incorporating ELB and LLM-inferred salience scores improves classification performance, especially for distortions with high interpretive ambiguity. Our results suggest a psychologically grounded and generalizable approach for fine-grained reasoning in mental health NLP. The dataset and implementation details are publicly accessible.

Abstract:
Warning: This paper may contain content that could be disturbing or offensive. Content moderation in online platforms faces persistent challenges due to the evolving complexity of user-generated content and the limitations of traditional rule-based and machine learning approaches. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled more sophisticated moderation via direct prompting or fine-tuning, these approaches often exhibit limited generalization, interpretability, and adaptability to unseen or ambiguous cases.In this work, we propose a novel moderation framework that leverages analogical examples to enhance rule induction and decision reliability. Our approach integrates end-to-end optimization of analogical retrieval, rule generation, and moderation classification, enabling the dynamic adaptation of moderation rules to diverse content scenarios. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms both rule-injected fine-tuning baselines and multi-stage static RAG pipelines in terms of moderation accuracy and rule quality. Further evaluations—including human assessments and external model generalization tests confirm the superiority of rules generated by our framework in terms of clarity, interpretability, and applicability. These findings highlight the potential of analogical example-driven methods for advancing robust, explainable, and generalizable content moderation in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs), such as GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5/2.5 Pro, and Reka Core, have advanced audio-visual reasoning capabilities, achieving strong performance in tasks like cross-modal understanding and generation. However, our DeafTest uncovers unanticipated failures: most of the state-of-the-art MLLMs struggle with very simple audio tasks, such as distinguishing louder sounds or sound counting . This raises a fundamental question—does a deficiency in low-level audio perception constrain higher-level audio-visual reasoning? To address this, we introduce AV-Odyssey Bench —a comprehensive benchmark of 4,555 meticulously designed problems that integrate text, audio, and visual modalities. Each task requires models to unify cross-modal reasoning, leveraging synchronized audio-visual cues to infer solutions. By structuring questions as multiple-choice, we ensure objective, reproducible evaluations without reliance on subjective human or LLM-based judgments. Through comprehensive benchmarking of closed-source and open-source models, we showcase: (i) current MLLMs lack robust audio-visual integration ability and (ii) performance on DeafTest (Pearson’s r = 0.945 ) strongly correlates with AV-Odyssey accuracy. These findings challenge assumptions about models’ multimodal proficiency and highlight fundamental audio perception as a reasoning bottleneck. We believe that our results provide concrete guidance for future dataset design, alignment strategies, and architectures.

Abstract:
Dynamic tool generation empowers Large Language Model (LLM) agents to synthesize tools on demand, yet a critical challenge remains: 32.4% of generated tools fail on first invocation. We present Causal Tool Diagnosis (CTD), a principled framework that moves beyond black-box reliability prediction to interpretable failure attribution. CTD constructs a Structural Causal Model (SCM) capturing how specification quality, code characteristics, and execution environment jointly determine tool outcomes. Uniquely leveraging code’s intervenability, we conduct controlled sandbox experiments to estimate causal effects—an advantage unavailable in pure text generation. CTD jointly predicts confidence (Spearman rank correlation coefficient 𝜌 =0.90) and root cause attribution (78% accuracy), with attributions directly guiding targeted repairs (+9.6% success rate over error-type classification). Our ARCHITECT framework, integrating CTD throughout the tool lifecycle, achieves state-of-the-art on four benchmarks including StableToolBench (+3.8%), MINT (+4.6%), T-Eval (+3.7%), and SWE-bench Lite (+2.4%), with consistent improvements across all settings.

Abstract:
E-commerce risk management requires aggregating diverse, deeply embedded web data through multi-step, stateful interactions, which traditional scraping methods and most existing Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents cannot handle. These agents are typically limited to single-step tasks and lack the ability to manage dynamic, interactive content critical for effective risk assessment. To address this challenge, we introduce RISK, a novel framework designed to build and deploy GUI agents for this domain. RISK integrates three components: (1) RISK-Data, a dataset of 8,492 single-step and 2,386 multi-step interaction trajectories, collected through a high-fidelity browser framework and a meticulous data curation process; (2) RISK-Bench, a benchmark with 802 single-step and 320 multi-step trajectories across three difficulty levels for standardized evaluation; and (3) RISK-R1, a R1-style reinforcement fine-tuning framework considering four aspects: (i) Output Format Constraint, (ii) Single-step and (iii) Multi-step Level Reward, and (iv) Task Level Reweight. Experiments show that RISK-R1 achieves a 6.8% improvement in offline single-step and an 8.8% improvement in offline multi-step, using only 7.2% of the parameters of the SOTA baseline. Moreover, it attains a top task success rate of 70.5% in online evaluation. RISK provides a scalable, domain-specific solution for automating complex web interactions in e-commerce risk management. The code is available at https://github.com/RenqiChen/RISK-GUI.

Abstract:
The growing demand for efficient and lightweight Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems has highlighted significant challenges when deploying Small Language Models (SLMs) in existing RAG frameworks. Current approaches face severe performance degradation due to SLMs’ limited semantic understanding and text processing capabilities, creating barriers for widespread adoption in resource-constrained scenarios. To address these fundamental limitations, we present MiniRAG, a novel RAG system designed for simplicity and efficiency. MiniRAG introduces two key technical innovations: (1) a semantic-aware heterogeneous graph indexing mechanism that combines text chunks and named entities in a unified structure, reducing reliance on complex semantic understanding, and (2) a lightweight topology-enhanced retrieval approach that leverages graph structures for efficient knowledge discovery without requiring advanced language capabilities. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that MiniRAG achieves comparable performance to LLM-based methods even when using SLMs while requiring only 25% of the storage space. Additionally, we contribute a comprehensive benchmark dataset for evaluating lightweight RAG systems under realistic on-device scenarios with complex queries.

Abstract:
While DLMs have emerged as an alternative to ARMs, robust content provenance mechanisms for this architecture remain unexplored. Existing multi-bit watermarking schemes, heavily reliant on the sequential context of ARMs, cannot be directly applied to DLMs. In this paper, we reframe the multi-bit watermarking problem through a novel Digital Signal Processing (DSP) lens. We draw an analogy between prior works and TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) in telecommunications, revealing their inherent limitations. To overcome these limitations, we introduce CDMArk , the first multi-bit watermarking framework tailored for DLMs, orchestrating a paradigm shift from TDMA to CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access). Our method encodes the entire watermark message across all tokens holographically. We further provide rigorous statistical guarantees for the watermark detection process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CDMArk achieves a new state-of-the-art Pareto frontier between imperceptibility and effectiveness.

Abstract:
Static benchmarks for harmful content detection face limitations in scalability and diversity, and may also be affected by contamination from web-scale pre-training corpora. To address these issues, we propose a framework for synthesizing harmful content, leveraging persona-guided large language model (LLM) agents. Our approach constructs two-dimensional user personas by integrating demographic identities and topical interests with situational harmful strategies, enabling the simulation of diverse and contextually grounded harmful interactions. We evaluate the framework along three dimensions: harmfulness, challenge level, and diversity. Both human and LLM-based evaluations confirm that our framework achieves a high harmful generation success rate. Experiments across multiple detection systems reveal that our synthetic scenarios are more challenging to detect than those in existing benchmarks. Furthermore, a multi-faceted analysis confirms that our approach achieves linguistic and topical diversity comparable to human-curated datasets, establishing our framework as an effective tool for robust stress-testing of harmful content detection systems.

Abstract:
Multi-step retrosynthetic planning is a fundamental challenge in organic chemistry, traditionally modeled as a combinatorial search problem guided by single-step prediction models. However, this search-centric paradigm often disconnects from the explicit chemical reasoning processes employed by human experts. In this paper, we propose R 3 (Reinforced Reasoning Retrosynthesis), a novel framework that reformulates this task as end-to-end generative reasoning. Instead of traversing a search tree, R 3 simulates the problem-solving logic of chemists to directly generate complete synthetic pathways. To achieve this, we initialize the model with domain knowledge and employ end-to-end Reinforcement Learning (RL) to optimize the entire planning policy. Experimental results on Retrobench show that R 3 achieves a state-of-the-art Top-1 accuracy of 43.7%, demonstrating that generative reasoning offers a superior alternative to traditional search algorithms in solving complex retrosynthetic problems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across diverse domains but are increasingly constrained by high inference latency. Early Exit has emerged as a promising solution to accelerate inference by dynamically bypassing redundant layers. However, in decoder-only architectures, the efficiency of Early Exit is severely bottlenecked by the KV Cache Absence problem, where skipped layers fail to provide the necessary historical states for subsequent tokens. Existing solutions, such as recomputation or masking, either introduce significant latency overhead or incur severe precision loss, failing to bridge the gap between theoretical layer reduction and practical wall-clock speedup. In this paper, we propose River-LLM, a training-free framework that enables seamless token-level Early Exit. River-LLM introduces a lightweight KV-Shared Exit River that allows the backbone’s missing KV cache to be naturally generated and preserved during the exit process, eliminating the need for costly recovery operations. Furthermore, we utilize state transition similarity within decoder blocks to predict cumulative KV errors and guide precise exit decisions. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks demonstrate that River-LLM achieves 1.71× to 2.16× practical speedup while maintaining high generation quality.

Abstract:
We present Omni-I2C, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the capability of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in converting complex, structured digital graphics into executable code. We argue that this task represents a non-trivial challenge for the current generation of LMMs: it demands an unprecedented synergy between high-fidelity visual perception—to parse intricate spatial hierarchies and symbolic details—and precise generative expression—to synthesize syntactically sound and logically consistent code. Unlike traditional descriptive tasks, Omni-I2C requires a holistic understanding where any minor perceptual hallucination or coding error leads to a complete failure in visual reconstruction. Omni-I2C features 1130 meticulously curated samples, defined by its breadth across subjects, image modalities, and programming languages. By incorporating authentic user-sourced cases, the benchmark spans a vast spectrum of digital content—from scientific visualizations to complex symbolic notations—each paired with executable reference code. To complement this diversity, our evaluation framework provides necessary depth; by decoupling performance into perceptual fidelity and symbolic precision, it transcends surface-level accuracy to expose the granular structural failures and reasoning bottlenecks of current LMMs. Our evaluation reveals a substantial performance gap among leading LMMs; even state-of-the-art models struggle to preserve structural integrity in complex scenarios, underscoring that multimodal code generation remains a formidable challenge. Data and code are available at https://github.com/MiliLab/Omni-I2C.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for improving the complex reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, current RLVR methods face two significant challenges: the near-miss reward problem, where a small mistake can invalidate an otherwise correct reasoning process, greatly hindering training efficiency; and exploration stagnation, where models tend to focus on solutions within their ”comfort zone”, lacking the motivation to explore potentially more effective alternatives. To address these challenges, we propose StepHint, a novel RLVR algorithm that utilizes multi-level stepwise hints to help models explore the solution space more effectively. StepHint partitions valid reasoning chains into reasoning steps using our proposed adaptive partitioning method. The initial few steps are used as hints, and simultaneously, multiple-level hints (each comprising a different number of steps) are provided to the model. This approach directs the model’s exploration toward a promising solution subspace while preserving its flexibility for independent exploration. By providing hints, StepHint mitigates the near-miss reward problem, thereby improving training efficiency. Additionally, the external reasoning pathways help the model develop better reasoning abilities, enabling it to move beyond its ”comfort zone” and mitigate exploration stagnation. StepHint outperforms competitive RLVR enhancement methods across six mathematical benchmarks and two out-of-domain benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly acting as human delegates in multi-agent environments, where a representative agent integrates diverse peer perspectives to make a final decision. Drawing inspiration from social psychology, we investigate how the reliability of this representative agent is undermined by the social context of its network. We define four key phenomena—social conformity, perceived expertise, dominant speaker effect, and rhetorical persuasion—and systematically manipulate the number of adversaries, relative intelligence, argument length, and argumentative styles. Our experiments demonstrate that the representative agent’s accuracy consistently declines as social pressure increases: larger adversarial groups, more capable peers, and longer arguments all lead to significant performance degradation. Furthermore, rhetorical strategies emphasizing credibility or logic can further sway the agent’s judgment, depending on the context. These findings reveal that multi-agent systems are sensitive not only to individual reasoning but also to the social dynamics of their configuration, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in AI delegates that mirror the psychological biases observed in human group decision-making.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in machine translation. However, maintaining discourse coherence and terminological consistency remains a persistent challenge in document-level translation (DocMT). Existing solutions, such as memory-based agents, predominantly rely on explicit context concatenation. This paradigm treats historical context as a static external resource, which often leads to context dilution, high inference latency, and superficial knowledge integration. To address these limitations, we propose AdaDPI, an adaptive agentic framework that shifts the DocMT paradigm from static retrieval to dynamic parametric internalization. Specifically, we design a linguistic uncertainty monitor (LUM) to actively detect critical discourse discontinuities by the model’s epistemic uncertainty. Upon detection, a context-to-parameter integrator (CPI) compiles retrieved external constraints directly into the model’s intrinsic state via an online parameter adaptation mechanism. Through the online parameter adaptation on a lightweight adapter, AdaDPI internalizes document-specific norms into the model’s intrinsic representations, enabling a progressive evolution of the translation strategy as the discourse unfolds. Extensive experiments on the discourse-rich GuoFeng and IWSLT2017 datasets demonstrate that AdaDPI significantly outperforms the SoTA baselines by more than 5 points on the consistency metric.

Abstract:
Developing culturally grounded multilingual AI systems remains challenging, particularly for low-resource languages. While synthetic data offers promise, its effectiveness in multilingual and multicultural contexts is underexplored. We investigate bottom-up synthetic data generation using large open-source LLMs (>= 235B parameters) grounded in language-specific Wikipedia content, complementing dominant top-down translation-based approaches from English. We introduce Updesh, a high-quality large-scale synthetic instruction-following dataset comprising 9.5M data points across 13 Indian languages and English, encompassing diverse reasoning and generative tasks emphasizing on enhancing long-context and multi-turn capabilities while improving alignment with Indian cultural contexts. Comprehensive evaluation using automated metrics and 10K human assessments confirms high data quality. Downstream evaluations performed by fine-tuning models on various datasets and assessing performance across 13 diverse multilingual datasets and model comparative evaluations, demonstrate that models trained on Updesh consistently obtain significant improvements on NLG tasks and remain competitive on NLU tasks. Improvements are most pronounced for low and medium-resource languages, effectively narrowing performance gaps with high-resource languages. Our findings provide empirical evidence that effective multilingual AI development requires multi-faceted, culturally grounded data curation strategies beyond translation-based approaches.

Abstract:
The efficiency of multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) largely hinges on their communication topology. However, designing an optimal topology is a non-trivial challenge, as it requires balancing competing objectives such as task performance, communication cost, and robustness. Existing frameworks often rely on static or hand-crafted topologies, which inherently fail to adapt to diverse task requirements, leading to either excessive token consumption for simple problems or performance bottlenecks for complex ones. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel generative framework called Guided Topology Diffusion (GTD) . Inspired by conditional discrete graph diffusion models, GTD formulates topology synthesis as an iterative construction process. At each step, the generation is steered by a lightweight proxy model that predicts multi-objective rewards (e.g., accuracy, utility, cost), enabling real-time, gradient-free optimization towards task-adaptive topologies. This iterative, guided synthesis process distinguishes GTD from single-step generative frameworks, enabling it to better navigate complex design trade-offs. We validated GTD across multiple benchmarks, and experiments show that this framework can generate highly task-adaptive, sparse, and efficient communication topologies, significantly outperforming existing methods in LLM agent collaboration. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/diffusion_agent-953C .

Abstract:
Culture serves as a fundamental determinant of human affective processing and profoundly shapes how individuals perceive and interpret emotional stimuli. Despite this intrinsic link extant evaluations regarding cultural alignment within Large Language Models primarily prioritize declarative knowledge such as geographical facts or established societal customs. These benchmarks remain insufficient to capture the subjective interpretative variance inherent to diverse sociocultural lenses. To address this limitation, we introduce CEDAR, a multimodal benchmark constructed entirely from scenarios capturing Culturally Elicited Distinct Affective Responses. To construct CEDAR, we implement a novel pipeline that leverages LLM-generated provisional labels to isolate instances yielding cross-cultural emotional distinctions, and subsequently derives reliable ground-truth annotations through rigorous human evaluation. The resulting benchmark comprises 10,962 instances across seven languages and 14 fine-grained emotion categories, with each language including 400 multimodal and 1,166 text-only samples. Comprehensive evaluations of 17 representative multilingual models reveal a dissociation between language consistency and cultural alignment, demonstrating that culturally grounded affective understanding remains a significant challenge for current models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are promising for medical question answering (QA) but remain unreliable in Chinese clinical settings due to hallucinations, weak factual grounding, and difficulty handling clinically complex cases. We propose CAMEC (Complexity-Aware Multi-Expert Collaboration), a framework that combines hierarchical medical adaptation with complexity-aware expert routing for reliable Chinese medical QA. We adopt a three-stage LoRA-based supervised fine-tuning pipeline for domain adaptation, instruction following, and clinical reasoning. At inference, CAMEC routes each query by predicted complexity and selectively recruits three experts: an internal chain-of-thought (CoT) expert, a retrieval-augmented expert over a dense medical vector database, and a knowledge graph (KG) expert over a structured medical knowledge base. An LLM-as-a-Judge module evaluates and critiques expert reports, iteratively refining them into a consensus answer. Experiments on four Chinese medical benchmarks show that CAMEC consistentlyoutperforms strong general and medical LLM baselines, achieving 78.86% (CMExam), 84.15% (MedQA-CN), 78.51% (CMMLU-Med), and 74.40% (CMB-exam), with consistent absolute improvements over the previous state-of-the-artHuatuoGPT-o1-7B across all benchmarks. The complexity-aware router reduces expert invocations and inference cost, making CAMEC both highly effective and computationally efficient.

Abstract:
Object hallucination critically undermines the reliability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), often stemming from a fundamental failure in cognitive introspection—where models blindly trust linguistic priors over specific visual evidence. Existing mitigations remain limited: contrastive decoding approaches operate superficially without rectifying internal semantic misalignments, while current latent steering methods rely on static vectors that lack instance-specific precision. We introduce Vision-Language Introspection (VLI), a training-free inference framework that simulates a metacognitive self-correction process. VLI first performs Attributive Introspection to diagnose hallucination risks via probabilistic conflict detection and localize the causal visual anchors. It then employs Interpretable Bi-Causal Steering to actively modulate the inference process, dynamically isolating visual evidence from background noise while neutralizing blind confidence through adaptive calibration. VLI achieves state-of-the-art performance on advanced models, reducing object hallucination rates by 12.67% on MMHal-Bench and improving accuracy by 5.8% on POPE.

Abstract:
Discrepancies between scientific papers and their code undermine reproducibility, a concern that grows as automated research agents scale scientific output beyond human review capacity. Whether LLMs can reliably detect such discrepancies has not been systematically measured. To this end, we present SciCoQA, a dataset of 635 paper-code discrepancies (92 real, 543 synthetic) for this cross-modal verification task. Across 22 evaluated models, even the best-performing LLMs, Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5 Mini, detect only 46.7% of real-world discrepancies, revealing a critical gap in automated scientific quality assurance. We construct SciCoQA from GitHub issues and reproducibility papers, and propose a synthetic generation pipeline to scale beyond AI to Physics, Quantitative Biology, and other computational sciences. We further introduce a taxonomy of discrepancy types and categories to characterize the occurring mismatches. Our analysis shows that models particularly struggle with omitted paper details, long-context inputs, and papers outside their pre-training corpus.

Abstract:
Efficiency and safety of Large Language Models (LLMs), among other factors, rely on the quality of tokenization. A good tokenizer not only improves inference speed and language understanding but also provides extra defense against jailbreak attacks and lowers the risk of hallucinations. In this work, we investigate the efficiency of code tokenization, in particular from the perspective of data source diversity. We demonstrate that code tokenizers are prone to producing unused, and thus under-trained, tokens due to the imbalance in repository and language diversity in the training data, as well as the dominance of source-specific, repetitive tokens that are often unusable in future inference. By modifying the BPE objective and introducing merge skipping, we implement different techniques under the name Source-Attributed BPE (SA-BPE) to regularize BPE training and minimize overfitting, thereby substantially reducing the number of under-trained tokens while maintaining the same inference procedure as with regular BPE. This provides an effective tool suitable for production use.

Abstract:
The security of LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) is critically threatened by propagation vulnerability, where malicious agents can distort collective decision-making through inter-agent interactions. While existing supervised defense methods demonstrate promising performance, they may be impractical in real-world scenarios due to their heavy reliance on labeled malicious agents to train a supervised malicious detection model. To enable practical and generalizable MAS defenses, in this paper, we propose BlindGuard, an unsupervised defense method that learns without requiring any attack-specific labels or prior knowledge of malicious behaviors. To this end, we establish a hierarchical agent encoder to capture individual, neighborhood, and global interaction patterns of each agent, providing a comprehensive understanding for malicious agent detection. Meanwhile, we design a corruption-guided detector that consists of directional noise injection and contrastive learning, allowing effective detection model training solely on normal agent behaviors. Extensive experiments show that BlindGuard effectively detects diverse attack types across MAS with various communication patterns while maintaining superior generalizability compared to supervised baselines.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs) have enabled explicit chain-of-thought inference across vision and language, substantially improving performance on complex reasoning tasks. Despite these gains, the reasoning process introduces a subtle yet critical vulnerability. We identify an underexplored multimodal safety failure mode in which harmful objectives are embedded within ostensibly benign contexts, leading models to over-prioritize narrative coherence during reasoning. We term this phenomenon Safety Context Amnesia (SCA), wherein models correctly perceive risk-relevant visual cues but fail to enforce safety constraints as the reasoning process becomes dominated by contextual alignment. To mitigate SCA, we propose Intent-Guided Safety Reasoning (IGSR), an inference-time defense that operates without modifying target model parameters. IGSR employs a Perception Decoupler to extract objective visual evidence into a structured intent output, followed by a Cognitive Arbiter that enforces explicit safety constraints prior to generation. Extensive experiments across multiple multimodal safety benchmarks demonstrate that IGSR improves defense success rates by over 62% compared to baselines, while largely preserving task utility. These results highlight the critical role of structured, intent-aware reasoning in achieving robust safety reasoning for multimodal reasoning models.

Abstract:
Answering natural language queries over relational data often requires retrieving and reasoning over multiple tables, yet most retrievers optimize only for query–table relevance and ignore table–table compatibility. We introduce REaR (Retrieve, Expand and Refine), a three-stage, LLM-free framework that separates semantic relevance from structural joinability for efficient, high-fidelity multi-table retrieval. REaR (i) retrieves query-aligned tables, (ii) expands these with structurally joinable tables via fast, precomputed column-embedding comparisons, and (iii) refines them by pruning noisy or weakly related candidates. Empirically, REaR is retriever-agnostic and consistently improves dense/ sparse retrievers on complex table QA datasets (BIRD, MMQA, and Spider) by improving both multi-table retrieval quality and downstream SQL execution. Despite being LLM-free, it delivers performance competitive with state-of-the-art LLM-augmented retrieval systems (e.g., ARM) while achieving much lower latency and cost. Ablations confirm complementary gains from expansion and refinement, underscoring REaR as a practical, scalable building block for table-based downstream tasks (e.g., Text-to-SQL).

Abstract:
Complex reasoning problems often involve implicit spatial and geometric relationships that are not explicitly encoded in text. While recent reasoning models perform well across many domains, purely text-based reasoning struggles to capture structural constraints in complex settings. In this paper, we introduce FIGR, which integrates executable visual construction into multi-turn reasoning via end-to-end reinforcement learning. Rather than relying solely on textual chains of thought, FIGR externalizes intermediate hypotheses by generating executable code that constructs diagrams within the reasoning loop. An adaptive reward mechanism selectively regulates when visual construction is invoked, enabling more consistent reasoning over latent global properties that are difficult to infer from text alone. Experiments on seven challenging mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that FIGR outperforms strong text-only chain-of-thought baselines, improving the base model by 13.12% on AIME 2025 and 11.00% on BeyondAIME. These results highlight the effectiveness of precise, controllable figure construction of FIGR in enhancing complex reasoning ability.

Abstract:
Standard depression assessment relies on instruments such as the clinician-rated Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and the patient-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), but manual scoring is time-consuming and subject to inter-rater variability. Prior automated approaches typically regress a single total score or coarse severity category, lacking the fine-grained subscore-level supervision needed for precise clinical diagnosis. To address this, we propose MTSP (Multi-Task Subscore Prediction), a fine-grained model for subscore prediction via multi-task learning. MTSP achieves state-of-the-art performance on the public E-DAIC dataset (MAE 3.48, RMSE 4.57) and generalizes well to the public PDCH and a large-scale private clinical dataset (CIDH), outperforming total-score regression baselines and Qwen3-14B direct scoring. We further show that multi-task learning is essential, subscore-level supervision improves assessment by better capturing symptom-cluster structure, and prior constraints plus task-level self-paced learning enhance robustness to subscore difficulty and annotation noise.

Abstract:
Research on mental state reasoning in language models (LMs) has the potential to inform theories of human social cognition—such as the theory that mental state reasoning emerges in part from language exposure—and our understanding of LMs themselves. Yet much published work on LMs relies on a relatively small sample of closed-source LMs, limiting our ability to rigorously test psychological theories and evaluate LM capacities. Here, we replicate and extend published work on the false belief task by assessing LM mental state reasoning behavior across 41 open-weight models (from distinct model families). We find sensitivity to implied knowledge states in 34% of the LMs tested; however, consistent with prior work, none fully "explain away" the effect in humans. Larger LMs show increased sensitivity and also exhibit higher psychometric predictive power. Finally, we use LM behavior to generate and test a novel hypothesis about human cognition: both humans and LMs show a bias towards attributing false beliefs when knowledge states are cued using a non-factive verb ("John thinks...") than when cued indirectly ("John looks in the..."). Unlike the primary effect of knowledge states, where human sensitivity exceeds that of LMs, the magnitude of the human knowledge cue effect falls squarely within the distribution of LM effect sizes—suggesting that distributional statistics of language can in principle account for the latter but not the former in humans. These results demonstrate the value of using larger samples of open-weight LMs to test theories of human cognition and evaluate LM capacities.

Abstract:
Microscaling Floating-Point (MXFP) has emerged as a promising low-precision format for large language models (LLMs). Despite various post-training quantization (PTQ) algorithms being proposed, they mostly focus on integer quantization, while their applicability and behavior under MXFP formats remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, this work conducts a systematic investigation of PTQ under MXFP formats, encompassing over 7 PTQ algorithms, 15 evaluation benchmarks, and 3 LLM families. The key findings include: 1) MXFP8 consistently achieves near-lossless performance, while MXFP4 introduces substantial accuracy degradation and remains challenging; 2) PTQ effectiveness under MXFP depends strongly on format compatibility, with some algorithmic paradigms being consistently more effective than others; 3) PTQ performance exhibits highly consistent trends across model families and modalities, in particular, quantization sensitivity is dominated by the language model rather than the vision encoder in multimodal LLMs; 4) The scaling factor of quantization is a critical error source in MXFP4, and a simple pre-scale optimization strategy can significantly mitigate its impact. Together, these results provide practical guidance on adapting existing PTQ methods to MXFP quantization.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed in socially consequential settings, raising concerns about social bias driven by demographic cues. A central challenge in measuring such social bias is attribution under visual confounding: real-world images entangle race and gender with correlated factors such as background and clothing, obscuring attribution. We propose a face-only counterfactual evaluation paradigm that isolates demographic effects while preserving real-image realism. Starting from real photographs, we generate counterfactual variants by editing only facial attributes related to race and gender, keeping all other visual factors fixed. Based on this paradigm, we construct FOCUS, a dataset of 480 scene-matched counterfactual images across six occupations and ten demographic groups, and propose REFLECT, a benchmark comprising three decision-oriented tasks: two-alternative forced choice, multiple-choice socioeconomic inference, and numeric salary recommendation. Experiments on five state-of-the-art VLMs reveal that demographic disparities persist under strict visual control and vary substantially across task formulations. These findings underscore the necessity of controlled, counterfactual audits and highlight task design as a critical factor in evaluating social bias in multimodal models.

Abstract:
Steering methods have emerged as effective tools for guiding large language models’ behavior, yet multimodal large language models (MLLMs) lack comparable techniques due to architectural diversity and limited availability of multimodal steering vectors. Inspired by this gap, we demonstrate that steering vectors derived solely from text-only LLM backbones can effectively guide and enhance their multimodal counterparts, revealing a novel cross-modal transfer that enables reuse of existing interpretability tools. Using community-standard methods—Sparse Autoencoders (SAE), Mean Shift, and Linear Probing—we validate this transfer effect across diverse MLLM architectures and visual reasoning tasks. Text-derived steering consistently enhances multimodal performance, with Mean Shift achieving up to +7.3% improvement in spatial relationship accuracy and +3.3% in counting accuracy on CV-Bench, and exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution datasets, for example reaching +34.2% on CLEVR counting tasks. This reveals that textual representations alone can effectively enhance visual grounding in MLLMs, bridging the mature ecosystem of text-based steering to MLLMs with minimal additional data collection or computational overhead.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on complex tasks by generating detailed Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. However, they tend to apply a uniform, computation-intensive deep reasoning strategy to all problems, leading to unnecessary overhead on simple tasks. This significantly hinders their efficiency in real-world applications. While existing methods have improved reasoning efficiency to some extent, they still face critical challenges such as conflicting objectives, limited adaptability. To address these limitations, we propose AdaMix, an adaptive reasoning framework via decoupled optimization. To mitigate optimization conflicts, AdaMix first constructs two specialized adapters: an efficiency-oriented short adapter and an accuracy-oriented long adapter. It then incorporates a difficulty-aware routing model that assesses problem complexity to predict a reasoning intensity coefficient. This coefficient is used to dynamically interpolate a mixed adapter from the two base adapters, enabling fine-grained reasoning control. Our experiment demonstrates that our AdaMix reduces the average response length of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-7B by 54.9% while improving accuracy by up to 4.8% on five mathematical datasets, thus indicating a favorable accuracy-efficiency trade-off.

Abstract:
Post-training hybridization of large language models (LLMs) often replaces quadratic self-attention with sliding-window attention (SWA) to reduce KV cache usage and improve latency. Existing hybridization schemes are typically defined either at the layer level (e.g., interleaving) or at the head level via static rankings from local to global. Layer-level schemes ignore that local and global dependencies are routed through heads within the same layer, while static head-level rankings suffer from entanglement: a head’s local/global behavior can change after hybridization. We propose BOSCH, Black-box Binary Optimization for Short-context Head Selection, a training-free method that formulates the problem as a Large Neighborhood Search and decomposes it into three subproblems: (i) layer-importance detection via small-budget black-box probes, (ii) adaptive per-layer SWA-ratio assignment based on these sensitivities, and (iii) grouped head-level optimization within ratio buckets. Extensive experiments on 4 LLMs ranging from 1.7B to 30B parameters, across 4 SWA ratios, show that BOSCH consistently outperforms layer-level heuristics and 6 strong static head-level methods, with larger gains at higher SWA ratios. Under continual pretraining, BOSCH recover original long-context performance faster and to a higher level. Analysis of the selected heads reveals substantial turnover for BOSCH across different SWA ratios, underscoring the importance of performing head-level selection for each target ratio rather than relying on fixed locality rankings.

Abstract:
While recent Spoken Language Models (SLMs) have been actively deployed in real-world scenarios, they lack the capability to discern Third-Party Interruptions (TPI) from the primary user’s ongoing flow, leaving them vulnerable to contextual failures. To bridge this gap, we introduce TPI-Train, a dataset of 88K instances designed with speaker-aware hard negatives to enforce acoustic cue prioritization for interruption handling, and TPI-Bench, a comprehensive evaluation framework designed to rigorously measure the interruption-handling strategy and precise speaker discrimination in deceptive contexts. Experiments demonstrate that our dataset design mitigates semantic shortcut learning—a critical pitfall where models exploit semantic context while neglecting acoustic signals essential for discerning speaker changes. We believe our work establishes a foundational resource for overcoming text-dominated unimodal reliance in SLMs, paving the way for more robust multi-party spoken interaction. The code for the framework is publicly available at https://tpi-va.github.io

Abstract:
Proactive dialogue has emerged as a critical and challenging research problem in advancing large language models (LLMs). Existing works predominantly focus on domain-specific or task-oriented scenarios, which leads to fragmented evaluations and limits the comprehensive exploration of models’ proactive dialogue abilities. In this work, we propose ProactiveEval, a unified framework for evaluating proactive dialogue capabilities of LLMs. This framework decomposes proactive dialogue into target planning and dialogue guidance, establishing evaluation metrics across various domains. Moreover, it also enables the automatic generation of diverse and challenging evaluation data. Based on the proposed framework, we develop 328 evaluation environments spanning 6 distinct domains. Through experiments with 22 different types of LLMs, we show that DeepSeek-R1 and Claude-3.7-Sonnet exhibit exceptional performance on target planning and dialogue guidance tasks, respectively. Finally, we investigate how reasoning capabilities influence proactive behaviors and discuss their implications for future model development. Our code and data are available at the https://github.com/liutj9/ProactiveEval.

Abstract:
Iconicity, the resemblance between linguistic form and meaning, is pervasive in sign languages, offering a natural testbed for visual grounding in vision–language models (VLMs). We introduce the Visual Iconicity Challenge, a video-based benchmark that adapts psycholinguistic measures to evaluate VLMs on three tasks: (i) phonological sign-form prediction, (ii) transparency (inferring meaning from visual form), and (iii) graded iconicity ratings. We assess 17 state-of-the-art VLMs in zero- and few-shot settings on Sign Language of the Netherlands and compare them to human baselines. VLMs mirror human phonological difficulty patterns (e.g., handshape harder than location) and achieve moderate to strong alignment with human iconicity ratings. However, they still fail to infer lexical meaning from visual form alone and show a systematic object-based bias that inverts the human preference for action-based signs. Crucially, models with stronger phonological form prediction correlate better with human iconicity judgments, indicating shared sensitivity to visually grounded structure. Our findings validate these diagnostic tasks, show that explicit reasoning narrows the open-to-closed-model calibration gap, and motivate human-centric signals for modelling iconicity in multimodal models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated better safety performance in high-resource languages than in low-resource languages. We attribute this issue as a mismatch gap between language-agnostic semantic understanding ability and language dominant safety alignment biased toward high-resource languages. Based on above insights, we empirically identify the semantic bottleneck in LLMs: intermediate layers in which the geometry of model representations is governed primarily by shared semantic content rather than language identity. Then, we propose Language-Agnostic Semantic Alignment (LASA), which anchors safety alignment directly in semantic bottlenecks. Experiments show that LASA substantially improves safety across all languages: average attack success rate (ASR) drops from 24.7% to 2.8% on LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct and remains within 3–4% across Qwen2.5 and Qwen3 Instruct models (7B–32B). Besides, our analysis and method offer a representation-level perspective on LLM safety, suggesting that safety alignment requires anchoring safety understanding not in surface text, but in the model’s language-agnostic semantic space.

Abstract:
Generative Reward Models (GenRMs) and LLM-as-a-Judge exhibit deceptive alignment by producing correct judgments for incorrect reasons, as they are trained and evaluated to prioritize Outcome Accuracy , which undermines their ability to generalize during RLHF. We introduce Rationale Consistency , a fine-grained metric that quantifies the alignment between the model’s reasoning process and human judgment. Our evaluation of frontier models reveals that rationale consistency effectively discriminates among state-of-the-art models and detects deceptive alignment, while outcome accuracy falls short in both respects. To mitigate this gap, we introduce a hybrid signal that combines rationale consistency with outcome accuracy for GenRM training. Our training method achieves state-of-the-art performance on RM-Bench (87.1%) and JudgeBench (82%), surpassing outcome-only baselines by an average of 5%. Using RM during RLHF, our method effectively improves performance as demonstrated on Arena Hard v2, notably yielding a 7% improvement in creative writing tasks. Further analysis confirms that our method escapes the deceptive alignment trap, effectively reversing the decline in rationale consistency observed in outcome-only training.

Abstract:
Many _in-silico_ simulations of human survey responses with large language models (LLMs) focus on generating closed-ended survey responses, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text instead. Previous research has used a diverse range of methods for generating closed-ended survey responses with LLMs and a standard practice remains to be identified. In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact that various Survey Response Generation Methods have on predicted survey responses. We present the results of 32 mio. simulated survey responses across 8 Survey Response Generation Methods, 4 political attitude surveys, and 10 open-weight language models. We find significant differences between the Survey Response Generation Methods in both individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment. Our results show that Restricted Generation Methods perform best overall, and that reasoning output does not consistently improve alignment. Our work underlines the significant impact that Survey Response Generation Methods have on simulated survey responses, and we develop practical recommendations on the application of Survey Response Generation Methods.

Abstract:
Online sexism increasingly appears in subtle, context-dependent forms that evade traditional detection methods. Its interpretation often depends on overlapping linguistic, psychological, legal, and cultural dimensions, which produce mixed and sometimes contradictory signals in annotated datasets. These inconsistencies, combined with label scarcity and class imbalance, result in unstable decision boundaries and cause fine-tuned models to overlook subtler, underrepresented forms of harm. To address these challenges, we propose a two-stage framework that unifies (i) targeted training procedures to better regularize supervision to scarce and noisy data with (ii) selective, reasoning-based inference to handle ambiguous or borderline cases. First, we stabilize the training combining class-balanced focal loss, class-aware batching, and post-hoc threshold calibration, strategies for the firs time adapted for this domain to mitigate label imbalance and noisy supervision. Second, we bridge the gap between efficiency and reasoning with a a dynamic routing mechanism that distinguishes between unambiguous instances and complex cases requiring a deliberative process. This reasoning process results in the novel Collaborative Expert Judgment (CEJ) module which prompts multiple personas and consolidates their reasoning through a judge model. Our approach outperforms existing approaches across several public benchmarks, with F1 gains of +4.48% and +1.30% on EDOS Tasks A and B, respectively, and a +2.79% improvement in ICM on EXIST 2025 Task 1.1.

Abstract:
Forecasting conversational derailment is the task of predicting, as the conversation unfolds, whether it will eventually derail into personal attacks. Since forecasting models operate in an online fashion, they must decide whether to "trigger" an alert after each utterance—for example, to notify participants or a moderator that the conversation is at risk of derailing. Existing approaches make this decision solely based on the estimated likelihood of derailment given the preceding utterances, implicitly assuming that the conversation’s future trajectory is fixed. As a result, they ignore the possibility of future recovery and incur an unnecessarily high rate of false positives.In this work we propose a method for decoupling the decision to trigger from derailment likelihood estimation. Our approach is inspired by the first human baseline on this task, which shows that humans achieve dramatically lower false positive rates by selectively deferring their decision to trigger when they anticipate that tension is likely to subside. We operationalize this insight with a deferral mechanism that uses forward-looking simulations to assess whether a tense moment admits plausible paths to recovery. Incorporating this mechanism into a state-of-the-art forecasting model substantially reduces false positives without sacrificing forecasting accuracy. More broadly, this work highlights the value of treating decision-making as a first-class component of forecasting systems.

Abstract:
Tool-augmented Language Models (TaLMs) can invoke external tools to solve problems beyond their parametric capacity. However, it remains unclear whether these tool-enabled gains reflect trustworthy reasoning. Focusing on the Code Interpreter tool, we show that even when tools are selected and executed correctly, TaLMs treat tool outputs as substitutes for reasoning, producing solutions that appear correct but lack coherent justification. We term this failure mode Tool-Induced Myopia (TIM), and study it using PyMath, a benchmark of 1,679 competition-level mathematical problems for which Python code is helpful but not sufficient. We further develop a multi-dimensional evaluation suite to quantify reasoning degradation in TaLMs relative to their non-tool counterparts. Our findings reveal that while TaLMs achieve up to a 19.3 percentage point gain in final-answer accuracy, their reasoning behavior consistently deteriorates (e.g., non-tool language models win up to 41.5% more often in pairwise comparisons of reasoning processes). This degradation intensifies with tool use; the more frequently a model invokes tools, the less coherent its reasoning becomes. Moreover, tool use shifts errors from arithmetic mistakes toward global reasoning failures (logic, assumption, creativity). Finally, we propose a preference-optimization-based framework that realigns TaLMs to use tool outputs as assistive evidence, improving both final-answer accuracy and reasoning depth under tool use. Code and data will be released upon publication.

Abstract:
The large language models offer a scaleable solution for the generation of synthetic data faced with a trade-off between maintaining the diversity of generation and achieving factually accurate results. This paper introduces Graphsynth, a framework which leverages a probabilistic factor graph modeling the universe of attributes. The framework leverages a high-level schema mapping compiled into efficient hard masks during the decoding phase for maintaining the syntactic truth and a span-synchronized verifier for dismissing logical contradictions at the decode time. The experiments conducted on biomedical, legal, and generic domains show that the method outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines with a structural integrity approaching perfection, a coverage of around 94% attributes on the factor graph solution, and a boost in performance on downstream tasks such as +17.9% on TruthfulQA.

Abstract:
Post-training compression of Multimodal LLMs faces a fundamental geometric conflict: parameter subspaces optimized for text often suppress orthogonal visual features. We demonstrate that standard SVD fails to resolve this cross-modal mismatch, causing catastrophic visual degradation. To bridge this gap, we introduce Joint-Whitening SVD (JW-SVD), a dual-objective framework that aligns vision and language manifolds via a Joint Covariance basis, preserving features critical to both. Additionally, we propose Global Spectrum-Aware Truncation to dynamically transfer parameter budget from the redundant Vision Tower to the sensitive Backbone. Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL and Llama-3-Next confirm that JW-SVD demonstrates superior retention of both text and image capabilities. In addition, it resolves the modality trade-off: it recovers over 30% of perceptual performance lost by baselines while maintaining parity in textual reasoning, enabling robust multimodal performance even at extreme compression rates.

Abstract:
Building Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems that generalize across different tasks remains a challenging problem. Data-driven approaches often struggle to transfer effectively to unseen tasks. While recent schema-based TOD frameworks improve generalization by decoupling task logic from language understanding, their reliance on neural or generative models often obscures how task schemas influence behaviour and hence impair interpretability. In this work, we introduce a novel framework, CoDial (Code for Dialogue), at the core of which is converting a predefined task schema to a structured heterogeneous graph and then to popular programmatic LLM guardrailing code, such as NVIDIA’s Colang. The pipeline enables efficient and interpretable alignment of dialogue policies during inference. We introduce two paradigms for LLM guardrailing code generation, CoDial-free and CoDial-structured, and propose a mechanism that integrates human feedback to iteratively improve the generated code. Empirically, CoDial achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on the widely used benchmark datasets, while providing inherent interpretability in the design. We additionally demonstrate CoDial’s iterative improvement via manual and LLM-aided feedback, making it a practical tool for human-guided alignment of LLMs in unseen domains.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant reasoning capabilities in scientific discovery but struggle to bridge the gap to physical execution in wet-labs. In these irreversible environments, probabilistic hallucinations are not merely incorrect; they can cause equipment damage or experimental failure. To address this, we propose BioProAgent , a neuro-symbolic framework that anchors probabilistic planning in a deterministic Finite State Machine (FSM). We introduce a State-Augmented Planning mechanism that enforces a rigorous Design-Verify-Rectify workflow, ensuring hardware compliance before execution. Furthermore, we address the context bottleneck inherent in complex device schemas by Semantic Symbol Grounding , reducing token consumption by ∼ 6 × through symbolic abstraction. In the extended BioProBench benchmark, BioProAgent achieves 95.6% physical compliance (compared to 21.0% for ReAct), demonstrating that neuro-symbolic constraints are essential for reliable autonomy in irreversible physical environments. Code at https://github.com/YuyangSunshine/bioproagent and Website at https://yuyangsunshine.github.io/BioPro-Project/ .

Abstract:
Multi-party social dialogue remains underexplored in the literature,in part due to the difficulty and cost of evaluation. As a result,recent work on synthetic dialogue generation often relies on automatedmetrics and LLM-as-a-Judge frameworks, despite limited evidence thatsuch judges reflect human preferences in social settings. In this work,we introduce a lightweight and controllable multi-party dialoguegeneration framework (MPOD) as an experimental instrument forstudying generation and evaluation in social interaction. Using thisframework, we conduct human evaluations of open-domain multi-partydialogue simulation and directly compare human judgments againststate-of-the-art LLM judges. Across 319 pairwise comparisons, weobserve near-random agreement between humans and automated judges(Cohen’s 𝜅 ≈ 0.11 ), driven by systematic behaviorsincluding extreme tie aversion and strong sensitivity toassistant-style verbosity. Crucially, human–human inter-annotatoragreement ( 𝜅 = 0.29 ) is substantially higher than human–LLMagreement. To isolate themechanism underlying this misalignment, we introduce a controlled Transplant Ablation , showing that LLM judges consistentlyprefer conversations containing a single proprietary, assistant-styleagent. Additional stress tests show that judges prefer GPT-styleconversations even when utterance order is randomly shuffled,indicating insensitivity to conversational structure and coherence.Our findings provide controlled evidence that currentinstruction-tuned LLM judges do not reliably reflect human preferences for naturalness, engagingness, and overall quality in multi-party social dialogue, calling into question their widespreaduse for validating synthetic conversational data.

Abstract:
Recent approaches in personalized reward modeling have primarily focused on leveraging user interaction history to align model judgments with individual preferences. However, existing approaches largely treat user context as a static or implicit conditioning signal, failing to capture the dynamic and multi-faceted nature of human judgment. In this paper, we propose P-Check, a novel personalized reward modeling framework, designed to train a plug-and-play checklist generator that synthesizes dynamic evaluation criteria for guiding the reward prediction. To better align these checklists with personalized nuances, we introduce Preference-Contrastive Criterion Weighting, a training strategy that assigns saliency scores to criteria based on their discriminative power for personalized judgment. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that P-Check not only improves reward accuracy but also enhances downstream personalized generation, and remains robust in OOD scenarios.

Abstract:
Multimodal emotion cause analysis in conversation aims to identify the causes of emotions by leveraging multimodal information. Existing studies mainly formulate this problem as either utterance-level emotion cause extraction, which provides clear cause localization but limited explanation, or multimodal emotion cause generation, which offers fine-grained explanations but lacks explicit traceability to source utterances. Moreover, existing datasets rely heavily on human judgment and lack well-defined structured theoretical guidance, leading to subjective and inconsistent annotations. To address these issues, we introduce joint Multimodal Emotion Cause Extraction and Summarization in conversation (MECES), a new task that simultaneously extracts emotion cause utterances and generates cause summaries, enabling both precise localization and interpretable explanations of emotion cause. We further construct a MECES dataset guided by the Activating Events–Beliefs–Consequences theory from psychology. This dataset consists of 5,787 emotion utterances annotated with causes, comprising 12,231 emotion-cause pairs and 6,040 cause summaries. We also propose an effective end-to-end joint learning approach for MECES task, establishing strong benchmark results for this newly introduced task and dataset.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly enhanced or replaced traditional Non-Player Characters (NPCs) in video games. However, these LLM-based NPCs inherit underlying social biases (e.g., race or class), posing fairness risks during in-game interactions. To address the limited exploration of this issue, we introduce FairGamer, the first benchmark to evaluate social biases across three interaction patterns: transaction, cooperation, and competition. FairGamer assesses four bias types, including class, race, age, and nationality, across 12 distinct evaluation tasks using a novel metric, FairMCV. Our evaluation of seven frontier LLMs reveals that: (1) models exhibit biased decision-making, with Grok-4-Fast demonstrating the highest bias (average FairMCV = 76.9%); and (2) larger LLMs display more severe social biases, suggesting that increased model capacity inadvertently amplifies these biases. We release FairGamer at https://github.com/BingkangShi/FairGamer to facilitate future research on NPC fairness.

Abstract:
In drug discovery, molecular optimization aims to iteratively refine a lead compound to improve molecular properties while preserving structural similarity to the original molecule. However, each oracle evaluation is expensive, making sample efficiency a key challenge for existing methods under a limited oracle budget. Trial-and-error approaches require many oracle calls, while methods that leverage external knowledge tend to reuse familiar templates and struggle on challenging objectives. A key missing piece is long-term memory that can ground decisions and provide reusable insights for future optimizations. To address this, we present MolMem ( Mol ecular optimization with Mem ory), a multi-turn agentic reinforcement learning (RL) framework with a dual-memory system. Specifically, MolMem uses Static Exemplar Memory to retrieve relevant exemplars for cold-start grounding, and Evolving Skill Memory to distill successful trajectories into reusable strategies. Built on this memory-augmented formulation, we train the policy with dense step-wise rewards, turning costly rollouts into long-term knowledge that improves future optimization. Extensive experiments show that MolMem achieves 90% success on single-property tasks (1.5 × over the best baseline) and 52% on multi-property tasks using only 500 oracle calls. Our code is available at https://github.com/REAL-Lab-NU/MolMem .

Abstract:
Large language models struggle with reasoning over long contexts where relevant information is sparsely distributed. Although plan-and-execute frameworks mitigate this by decomposing tasks into planning and execution, their effectiveness is often limited by unreliable plan generation due to dependence on surface-level cues. Consequently, plans may be based on incorrect assumptions, and once a plan is formed, identifying errors and revising it reliably becomes difficult, limiting the effectiveness of reactive refinement. To address this limitation, we propose PPA-Plan, a proactive planning strategy for long-context reasoning that focuses on preventing such failures before plan generation. PPA-Plan identifies potential logical pitfalls and false assumptions, formulates them as negative constraints, and conditions plan generation on explicitly avoiding these constraints. Experiments on long-context QA benchmarks show that executing plans generated by PPA-Plan consistently outperforms existing plan-and-execute methods and direct prompting.

Abstract:
Traditional task-oriented dialog systems are unable to evolve from ongoing interactions or adapt to new domains after deployment, that is a critical limitation in real-world dynamic environments. Continual learning approaches depend on episodic retraining with human-curated data, failing to achieve autonomy lifelong improvement. While evolutionary computation and LLM driven self-improvement offer promising mechanisms for dialog optimization, they lack a unified framework for holistic, iterative strategy refinement. To bridge this gap, we propose DarwinTOD, a lifelong self-evolving dialog framework that systematically integrates these two paradigms, enabling continuous strategy optimization from a zero-shot base without task-specific fine-tuning. DarwinTOD maintains an Evolvable Strategy Bank and operates through a dual-loop process: online multi-agent dialog execution with peer critique, and offline structured evolutionary operations that refine the strategy bank using accumulated feedback. This closed-loop design enables autonomous continuous improvement without human intervention. Extensive experiments show that DarwinTOD surpasses previous state-of-the-art methods and exhibits continuous performance gains throughout evolution. Our work provides a novel framework for building dialog systems with lifelong self-evolution capabilities.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer an efficient alternative to autoregressive models through parallel decoding, yet existing post-training methods largely rely on random masking strategies that overlook intrinsic token dependencies. In this work, we present an empirical analysis of attention in dLLMs and show that tokens attending more strongly to revealed context exhibit greater generation stability and play a critical role in reasoning. Motivated by these findings, we propose AGDO, an attention-guided denoising and optimization framework that aligns both training and optimization with attention-derived dependencies. AGDO determines the denoising order based on attention structure and emphasizes attention-critical tokens during supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. Experiments on mathematical and coding benchmarks demonstrate that AGDO consistently improves reasoning performance, outperforming state-of-the-art post-training methods for dLLMs.

Abstract:
Personalization of LLMs by sociodemographic subgroup often improves user experience, but can also introduce or amplify biases and unfairoutcomes across groups. Prior work has employed so-called personas, sociodemographic user attributes conveyed to a model, to studybias in LLMs by relying on a single cue to prompt a persona, such as user names or explicit attribute mentions. This disregards LLM sensitivity to prompt variation and the rarity of some cues in real interactions (external validity). We compare six commonly used personacues across seven open and proprietary LLMs on four writing and advice tasks. While cues are overall highly correlated, they produce sub-stantial variance in responses across personas that can change findings on persona-induced differences and bias. We therefore cautionagainst claims based on single persona cues, especially when they are overly explicit and have low external validity.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have improved performance in multi-modal learning, raising the question of whether these models truly understand the content they process. Crucially, can VLMs detect when a reasoning process is wrong and identify its error type? To answer this, we present MMErroR, a multi-modal benchmark of 1997 samples, each embedding a single coherent reasoning error. These samples span 24 subdomains across six top-level domains, ensuring broad coverage and taxonomic richness. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on answer correctness, MMErroR targets a process-level, error-centric evaluation that requires models to detect incorrect reasoning and classify the error type within both visual and linguistic contexts. We evaluate 12 representative VLMs, and even the best model, Gemini-3-Pro-Preview, classifies the error correctly in only 66.65% of cases, underscoring the challenge of identifying erroneous reasoning. Furthermore, the ability to accurately identify errors offers valuable insights into the capabilities of multi-modal models.Project Page: https://mmerror-benchmark.github.io

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents require long-term user memory for consistent personalization, but limited context windows hinder tracking evolving preferences over long interactions. Existing memory systems mainly rely on static, hand-crafted update rules; although reinforcement learning (RL)-based agents learn memory updates, sparse outcome rewards provide weak supervision, resulting in unstable long-horizon optimization. Drawing on memory schema theory and the functional division between prefrontal regions and hippocampus regions, we introduce MemCoE, a cognition-inspired two-stage optimization framework that learns how memory should be organized and what information to update. In the first stage, we propose Memory Guideline Induction to optimize a global guideline via contrastive feedback interpreted as textual gradients; in the second stage, Guideline-Aligned Memory Policy Optimization uses the induced guideline to define structured process rewards and performs multi-turn RL to learn a guideline-following memory evolution policy. We evaluate on three personalization memory benchmarks, covering explicit and implicit preferences as well as different sizes and noise levels, and observe consistent improvements over strong baselines with favorable robustness, transferability, and efficiency[https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_MemCoE].

Abstract:
Large language models pretrained on general-domain corpora often exhibit tokenization inefficiencies when applied to specialized domains. Although continual pretraining for domain adaptation partially alleviate performance degradation, it does not resolve the fundamental vocabulary mismatch. To address this gap, we introduce a targeted parameter-efficient domain adaptation approach that combines vocabulary adaptation with pretraining for LLM-based text summarization. Our unified framework augments pretrained tokenizers with domain-specific tokens while selectively replacing under-trained and unreachable tokens to limit parameter growth. We evaluate our approach on Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B across legal and medical summarization tasks on a challenge-oriented evaluation protocol focused on expert-driven text and summaries which typically has higher concentration of over-fragmented Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) words. The vocabulary adaptation algorithm enhances the overall quality of the summarization model by improving semantic similarity between the generated summaries and their references. In addition, the adapted model produces summaries that incorporate more appropriate novel and domain-specific words, leading to improved coherence, relevance, and faithfulness. We further observe that our proposed approach significantly reduce training time by 35-55% over continual pretraining and reduce parameter counts up to 37% w.r.t expansion-only methods. We make codebase publicly available at [url](https://github.com/gb-kgp/VocabReplace-Then-Expand).

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced natural language processing, but their massive parameter counts create computational and memory challenges during deployment. Post-training quantization (PTQ) has emerged as a promising approach to mitigate these challenges. While existing PTQ methods can effectively quantize LLMs, they experience substantial accuracy loss at extremely low bit-widths due to high-impact parameters. Several approaches address this by retaining high-impact parameters in FP16 format, but they apply fixed ratios across all layers, overlooking layer-wise sensitivity variations. We propose a quadratic optimization framework that determines layer-specific ratios of high-impact parameters while considering inter-layer dependencies. We quantize high-impact parameters to moderate bit-widths while the remaining parameters are quantized to extremely low bit-widths. Under the same resource budget, this preserves more high-impact parameters than methods retaining a few in FP16 format. Our framework enables leveraging advanced quantization methods for high-impact parameters while applying lightweight computational quantization methods to the rest, achieving an effective balance between computational efficiency and accuracy during quantization process.

Abstract:
The advent of multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) has greatly advanced research on video fake news detection (VFND) tasks. Existing benchmarks typically focus on the detection accuracy, while failing to provide fine-grained assessments for the entire detection process. To address these limitations, we introduce POVFNDB (Process-oriented Video Fake News Detection Benchmark), a process-oriented benchmark comprising 10 tasks designed to systematically evaluate MLLMs’ perception, understanding, and reasoning capabilities in VFND. This benchmark contains 36,240 human-annotated question-answer (QA) in structured or open-ended formats, spanning 15 distinct evaluation dimensions that characterize different aspects of the video fake news detection process.Using POVFNDB, we conduct comprehensive evaluations on both proprietary and open-source MLLMs. Moreover, We fine-tune Qwen2.5VL-7B-Instruct on a reasoning dataset generated by our proposed POVFND-CoT, a chain-of-thought method that utilizes rationales from evaluation results and rationale validation. The resulting model achieves sota performance on VFND.

Abstract:
Hate speech remains prevalent in human society and continues to evolve in its forms and expressions. Modern advancements in the internet and online anonymity accelerate its rapid spread and complicate its detection. However, hate speech datasets exhibit diverse characteristics primarily because they are constructed from different sources and platforms, each reflecting different linguistic styles and social contexts. Despite this diversity, prior studies on hate speech detection often rely on fixed methodologies without adapting to data-specific features. We introduce RV-HATE, a detection framework designed to account for the dataset-specific characteristics of each hate speech dataset. RV-HATE consists of multiple specialized modules, where each module focuses on distinct linguistic or contextual features of hate speech. The framework employs reinforcement learning to optimize weights that determine the contribution of each module for a given dataset. A voting mechanism then aggregates the module outputs to produce the final decision. RV-HATE offers two primary advantages: (1) it improves detection accuracy by tailoring the detection process to dataset-specific attributes, and (2) it also provides interpretable insights into the distinctive features of each dataset. Consequently, our approach effectively addresses implicit hate speech and achieves superior performance compared to conventional static methods.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) trained with Long Chain-of-Thought have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation and mathematical reasoning. However, their potential in multi-turn Text-to-SQL tasks remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on unstable API-based inference or require expensive fine-tuning on small-scale models. In this work, we present Rose-SQL, a training-free framework that leverages small-scale LRMs through in-context learning to enable accurate context-dependent parsing. We introduce the Role-State, a fine-grained representation that bridges the structural gap between schema linking and SQL generation by serving as a structural blueprint. To handle conversational dependencies, Rose-SQL traces the evolution of Role-State through historical context via structural isomorphism checks, guiding the model to infer the possible SQL composition for the current question through verified interaction trajectories. Experiments on the SParC and CoSQL benchmarks show that, within the Qwen3 series, Rose-SQL outperforms in-context learning baselines at the 4B scale and substantially surpasses state-of-the-art fine-tuned models at the 8B and 14B scales, while showing consistent gains on additional reasoning backbones.

Abstract:
This survey reviews LLM-based multi-agent systems for clinical and healthcare workflows, including diagnosis, triage, consultation, discharge, mental health, and EHR-linked decision support. We define AI hospitals as workflow-level clinical systems in which agents take explicit roles, hand off shared state, use EHR- or guideline-grounded tools, and operate with safety gates and audit-ready logs. We argue that these systems should be compared at the workflow level, rather than only by model components or end-task accuracy, because clinical action, evidence, and accountability are expressed through state transitions and handoffs. We organize the literature through a workflow-level taxonomy covering roles and handoffs, memory and evidence, tools, and reasoning, control, and escalation. We further synthesize major workflow settings and task families, introduce a four-layer evaluation stack spanning safety, process, outcome, and operations, and connect model capabilities to workflow observables relevant to deployment. Finally, we present Integration Readiness Levels (IRL1-IRL6), task-level instrumentation requirements, and recurring workflow failure modes as a practical framework for comparing, evaluating, and deploying clinical LLM agents and AI hospitals.

Abstract:
Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents. Existing OCR-free methods face a trade-off between capacity and precision: end-to-end models scale poorly with document length, while visual retrieval-based pipelines are brittle and passive. We propose Doc- V , an OCR-free agentic framework that casts multi-page DocVQA as sequential evidence aggregation. Doc- V begins with a thumbnail overview, then actively navigates via semantic retrieval and targeted page fetching, and aggregates evidence in a structured working memory for grounded reasoning. Trained by imitation learning from expert trajectories and further optimized with Group Relative Policy Optimization, Doc- V balances answer accuracy with evidence-seeking efficiency. Across five benchmarks, Doc- V outperforms open-source baselines and approaches proprietary models, improving out-of-domain performance by up to 47.9% over RAG baseline. Other results reveal effective evidence aggregation with selective attention, not increased input pages.

Abstract:
As large language models are deployed in high-stakes enterprise applications, from healthcare to finance, ensuring adherence to organization-specific policies has become essential. Yet existing safety evaluations focus exclusively on universal harms. We present COMPASS (Company/Organization Policy Alignment Assessment), the first systematic framework for evaluating whether LLMs comply with organizational allowlist and denylist policies. We apply COMPASS to eight diverse industry scenarios, generating and validating 5,920 queries that test both routine compliance and adversarial robustness through strategically designed edge cases. Evaluating seven state-of-the-art models, we uncover a fundamental asymmetry: models reliably handle legitimate requests (>95% accuracy) but catastrophically fail at enforcing prohibitions, refusing only 13–40% of adversarial denylist violations. These results demonstrate that current LLMs lack the robustness required for policy-critical deployments, establishing COMPASS as an essential evaluation framework for organizational AI safety.

Abstract:
Writing effective rebuttals is a high-stakes task that demands more than linguistic fluency, as it requires precise alignment between reviewer intent and manuscript details. Current solutions typically treat this as a direct-to-text generation problem, suffering from hallucination, overlooked critiques, and a lack of verifiable grounding. To address these limitations, we introduce RebuttalAgent , the first multi-agents framework that reframes rebuttal generation as an evidence-centric planning task. Our system decomposes complex feedback into atomic concerns and dynamically constructs hybrid contexts by synthesizing compressed summaries with high-fidelity text while integrating an autonomous and on-demand external search module to resolve concerns requiring outside literature. By generating an inspectable response plan before drafting, RebuttalAgent ensures that every argument is explicitly anchored in internal or external evidence. We validate our approach on the proposed RebuttalBench and demonstrate that our pipeline outperforms strong baselines in coverage, faithfulness, and strategic coherence, offering a transparent and controllable assistant for the peer review process. Code will be released.

Abstract:
Automated red-teaming has emerged as a scalable approach for auditing Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to deployment, yet existing approaches lack mechanisms to efficiently adapt to model-specific vulnerabilities at inference. We introduce Red-Bandit, a red-teaming framework that adapts online to identify and exploit model failure modes under distinct attack styles (e.g., manipulation, slang). Red-Bandit post-trains a set of parameter-efficient LoRA experts, each specialized for a particular attack style, using reinforcement learning that rewards the generation of unsafe prompts via a rule-based safety model. At inference, a multi-armed bandit policy dynamically selects among these attack-style experts based on the target model’s response safety, balancing exploration and exploitation. Red-Bandit outperforms state-of-the-art methods on AdvBench and HarmBench, achieving higher attack success rates under sufficient exploration budgets (ASR@10), while generating more human-readable adversarial prompts (lower perplexity). In addition, Red-Bandit’s bandit policy serves as a diagnostic tool for identifying model-specific vulnerabilities by indicating which attack styles most effectively elicit harmful behaviors.

Abstract:
Modern evaluation of Legal QA systems is shifting from terminal accuracy toward process-aware analyses of model reasoning. We propose a diagnostic framework grounded in monotonic pedagogical scaffolding, where language models receive gold-standard, case-relevant information across stages aligned with the canonical legal framework FIRAC — Facts, Issue, Rules, Application, Conclusion. By strictly adding solution-relevant content at each step, we introduce a controlled monotonic intervention that allows for the evaluation of reasoning trajectories rather than isolated outcomes.This longitudinal design enables the introduction of two transition-based diagnostics: Errors-to-Success (E2S) quantifies the guidance required to reach correctness, while Success-to-Errors (S2E) measures the fragility of that correctness under additional structure. These local patterns define a global robustness criterion termed Stable Accuracy, which credits a response only if the model maintains correctness throughout all scaffolding stages and enforces a higher bar for correctness by distinguishing sustained reasoning from transient patterns.We instantiate the framework on 3,123 Brazilian Bar Exam questions paired with expert-annotated explanations. Our findings reveal model instability patterns hidden from accuracy-only metrics and demonstrate that terminal accuracy systematically overestimates legal reasoning competence. To test the robustness of our diagnostics, we also evaluate a majority-vote aggregation across multiple reasoning samples, finding that the observed instability patterns persist under this stronger inference setting. Furthermore, principal component analysis indicates that legal domains cluster into distinct regions, suggesting systematic differences in reasoning demands across domains. While focused on the legal domain, our evaluation protocol is generalizable to any task with a staged reasoning structure.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) store and recall factual knowledge, yet the precise mechanism of how entity representations are transformed to enable specific attribute retrieval remains underexplored. In this work, we investigate this mechanism through the lens of an “attribute-computation path”—a sequence of computational steps over the entity representation required to elicit a target attribute. We then propose an iterative patching protocol to identify a minimal subset of layers necessary for this computation. Applying our method to LLaMA 3.1 8B and Qwen 3 8B, we find that these paths are non-contiguous, often skipping layers, and that models possess multiple, functionally-equivalent paths for the same entity and fact, highlighting a high degree of redundancy in attribute computation. This implies that knowledge computation is highly distributed, potentially explaining the localization-editing mismatch and suggesting that knowledge storage and retrieval in LLMs is far from being well understood.

Abstract:
Evaluating the quality of tables generated by large language models (LLMs) remains an open challenge: existing metrics either flatten tables into text, ignoring structure, or rely on fixed references that limit generalization. We present TabReX, a reference-less, property-driven framework for evaluating tabular generation via graph-based reasoning. TabReX converts both source text and generated tables into canonical knowledge graphs, aligns them through an LLM-guided matching process, and computes interpretable, rubric-aware scores that quantify structural and factual fidelity. The resulting metric provides controllable trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity, yielding human-aligned judgments and cell-level error traces. To systematically asses metric robustness, we introduce TabReX-Bench, a large-scale benchmark spanning six domains and twelve planner-driven perturbation types across three difficulty tiers. Empirical results show that TabReX achieves the highest correlation with expert rankings, remains stable under harder perturbations, and enables fine-grained model-vs-prompt analysis establishing a new paradigm for trustworthy, explainable evaluation of structured generation systems.

Abstract:
High-quality scientific data is critical for advancing LLMs, yet academic literature remains largely underutilized. This work addresses the fundamental question: How can we systematically unlock scientific data’s value for pre-training? First, we construct a large-scale raw scientific corpus but identify a critical Learnability Gap, revealing that direct pre-training yields negligible gains. To bridge this, we develop a multi-stage pipeline featuring content cleaning and pedagogical augmentation, resulting in SciPedia, a 900B-token corpus. Finally, we establish a controlled verification framework: we develop SciPedia-Eval benchmark and conduct 600B tokens of continued pre-training (CPT) starting from transparent base models (3B/7B) trained from scratch. Compared to a CPT baseline trained with general-purpose data, our approach with SciPedia data boosts average performance by +2.12 (3B) and +2.95 (7B), reaching +5.60 and +8.40 on in-domain tasks. This setup further allows us to derive empirical guidelines for data composition and model configurations.

Abstract:
Large Language Models have shown remarkable potential as autonomous agents, but their effectiveness in knowledge-intensive tasks remains limited by passive knowledge utilization. We introduce KARL (Knowledge-Augmented Reinforcement Learning), a framework that enables LLM agents to dynamically explore structured knowledge sources through multi-turn interactions. Unlike existing retrieval-augmented approaches, KARL empowers agents to proactively decide when and what knowledge to acquire during task execution. Our framework incorporates online reinforcement learning with curiosity-driven reward shaping, explicitly incentivizing knowledge exploration while optimizing tool-use behaviors end-to-end. Extensive evaluation across six structured knowledge benchmarks demonstrates that KARL achieves state-of-the-art performance, with our Qwen2.5-14B-based agent significantly outperforming GPT-4o, Claude-4, and o4-mini on both knowledge graph and database tasks.Source code is available at https://github.com/THUDM/KARL.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong implicit personalization ability, yet most existing approaches treat this behavior as a black box, relying on prompt engineering or fine tuning on user data. In this work, we adopt a mechanistic interpretability perspective and hypothesize the existence of a sparse set of Preference Heads, attention heads that encode user specific stylistic and topical preferences and exert a causal influence on generation. We introduce Differential Preference Steering (DPS), a training free framework that (1) identifies Preference Heads through causal masking analysis and (2) leverages them for controllable and interpretable personalization at inference time. DPS computes a Preference Contribution Score (PCS) for each attention head, directly measuring its causal impact on user aligned outputs. During decoding, we contrast model predictions with and without Preference Heads, amplifying the difference between personalized and generic logits to selectively strengthen preference aligned continuations. Experiments on widely used personalization benchmarks across multiple LLMs demonstrate consistent gains in personalization fidelity while preserving content coherence and low computational overhead. Beyond empirical improvements, DPS provides a mechanistic explanation of where and how personalization emerges within transformer architectures.

Abstract:
P arameter- E fficient F ine- T uning ( PEFT ) has become a popular alternative to F ull-Parameter F ine- T uning ( FFT ), achieving similar performance on many benchmarks with far lower computational and memory costs. Yet, its effectiveness on complex tasks such as reasoning and instruction-following remains unclear. In this work, we provide a theoretical and empirical comparison of PEFT and FFT in terms of representational capacity and robustness. We show that PEFT’s solution space is a strict subset of FFT’s and derive upper bounds revealing how its restricted parameterization limits expressiveness and increases vulnerability to perturbations. Experiments on 20 datasets and 11 adversarial test sets support these findings, indicating that while PEFT performs well on standard tasks, its weaknesses on complex and adversarial settings call for new directions beyond current PEFT paradigms.The source code is in the anonymous GitHub repository[https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PEFTEval-E2AC ].

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) with sparse outcome rewards suffers from inefficient credit assignment in complex LLM reasoning tasks. While utilizing stronger LLMs as teachers to derive dense token-level supervision offers a cost-effective alternative to proprietary reward models, it relies on the flawed assumption that teachers are perfect oracles. In reality, teacher models exhibit capability limitations and uncertainty, producing noisy signals that make student policies susceptible to reward hacking. To address this, we propose Teacher Reward Adaptive Calibration (TRAC), a robust framework that filters noisy supervision by dynamically modulating teacher influence via a multi-granularity calibration mechanism. TRAC evaluates teacher reliability across three principled dimensions: problem-level expertise, trajectory-level discrimination, and token-level confidence. Furthermore, we integrate TRAC with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), formulating as TRAC-GRPO, which treats calibrated teacher-derived reward as an additive advantage reshaping term to ensure fair advantage estimation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TRAC effectively mitigates teacher noise, significantly enhancing the reasoning capabilities and training stability of LLMs compared to standard baselines. The code will be available at: https://github.com/JIA-Lab-research/TRAC .

Abstract:
Recent work, using the Biasing Features metric, labels a CoT as unfaithful if it omits a prompt-injected hint that affected the prediction. We argue this metric adopts a narrow notion of faithfulness and confuses unfaithfulness with incompleteness, the lossy compression needed to turn distributed transformer computation into a linear natural language narrative. On multi-hop reasoning tasks with instruct-tuned and reasoning models, many CoTs flagged as unfaithful by Biasing Features are judged faithful by other metrics, exceeding 50% in some models. With a new faithful@k metric, we show that larger inference-time budgets greatly increase hint verbalization (up to 90% in some settings), suggesting much apparent unfaithfulness is due to tight token limits. Using Causal Mediation Analysis, we further show that even non-verbalized hints can causally mediate prediction changes through the CoT. We therefore caution against relying solely on hint-based evaluations and advocate a broader interpretability toolkit, including causal mediation and corruption-based metrics. We do not claim all CoTs are faithful, only that the absence of hint words alone does not prove unfaithfulness.

Abstract:
The quality of pre-training data critically impacts the capabilities of large language models. Existing pipelines rely on expert-crafted heuristic rules, which primarily operate at the sample level and are based on coarse statistical indicators, thus lacking content-aware, fine-grained noise detection. While recent generative approaches, e.g., ProX-C, enable token-level refinement, their reliance on synthesizing Python code incurs prohibitive computational cost at scale and can introduce hallucinations into the refined data. To overcome these limitations, we propose Selecting over Tokens (SelecT), a novel framework that reframes data refinement as a highly efficient token classification task. SelecT classifies each token as either informative or noisy and subsequently removes the latter. This design achieves fine-grained data optimization while avoiding the inefficiency of generation, ensuring scalability. When evaluated on diverse downstream benchmarks, the model trained on SelecT-refined corpora, on average, outperforms the one trained on raw data by over 2% and exceeds the best heuristic baselines by more than 1% while preserving 17% more tokens than the latter. Furthermore, SelecT achieves higher average performance than the generative ProX-C across all experimental settings, and is 2.5x faster at inference, even with twice the parameters. Our results establish SelecT as an effective, efficient, and scalable solution for pre-training data optimization.

Abstract:
Solving complex reasoning tasks may involve visual understanding, domain knowledge retrieval, numerical calculation, and multi-step reasoning. Existing methods augment large language models (LLMs) with external tools but are restricted to specialized domains, limited tool types, or require additional training data. In this paper, we introduce OctoTools, a training-free, user-friendly, and easily extensible multi-agent framework designed to tackle complex reasoning across diverse domains. OctoTools introduces standardized tool cards to encapsulate tool functionality, a planner for both high-level and low-level planning, and an executor to carry out tool usage. We validate OctoTools’ generality across 16 diverse tasks (including MathVista, MMLU-Pro, MedQA, and GAIA-Text), achieving substantial average accuracy gains of 9.3% over GPT-4o. Furthermore, OctoTools also outperforms AutoGen, GPT-Functions, and LangChain by up to 10.6% when given the same set of tools. Through comprehensive analysi, ablations, and robustness tests with compact backbones and noisy tool environments, OctoTools demonstrates advantages in task planning, effective tool usage, and multi-step problem solving. Code, demos, and visualization are publicly available at https://octotools.github.io/ .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can reliably distinguish grammatical from ungrammatical sentences, but how grammatical knowledge is represented within the model remains an open question. We investigate whether different syntactic phenomena recruit shared or distinct components in LLMs. Using a functional localization approach inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we identify the LLM units most responsive to 67 English syntactic phenomena in seven open-weight models. These units are consistently recruited across sentence instances and causally support model performance. Critically, different types of syntactic agreement (e.g., subject-verb, anaphor, determiner-noun) recruit overlapping sets of units, suggesting that agreement constitutes a meaningful functional category in LLMs. This pattern holds in Russian and Chinese, and further, across languages: in a cross-lingual analysis of 57 languages, syntactically similar languages share more units for subject-verb agreement. Taken together, these findings reveal that syntactic agreement—a critical marker of syntactic dependencies—constitutes a meaningful category within LLMs’ representational spaces.

Abstract:
Polysemy enables a single word to convey multiple related meanings, reflecting the conceptual and emotional aspects of the evolution of the senses. We introduce the first sense-level benchmark, SenseRel , for modeling semantic relations between word senses, uniting denotational and connotational aspects of meaning. SenseRel distinguishes denotational relations, such as generalization or metaphor, as well as two connotational dimensions: valence and arousal. We evaluate large language models (LLMs), GPT-4o, Llama 3.1, and DeepSeek, in zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. Results show that GPT-4o best aligns with human affective judgments, while a fine-tuned RoBERTa model excels at classifying denotational relations.

Abstract:
This paper introduces MauBERT, a multilingual extension of HuBERT that leverages articulatory features for robust cross-lingual phonetic representation learning. We continue HuBERT pre-training with supervision based on a phonetic-to-articulatory feature mapping in 55 languages. Our models learn from multilingual data to predict articulatory features or phones, resulting in language-independent representations that capture multilingual phonetic properties. Through comprehensive ABX discriminability testing, we show MauBERT models produce more context-invariant representations than state-of-the-art multilingual self-supervised learning models. Additionally, the models effectively adapt to unseen languages and casual speech with minimal self-supervised fine-tuning (10 hours of speech). This establishes an effective approach for instilling linguistic inductive biases in self-supervised speech models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) and agent-based frameworks have advanced rapidly, enabling diverse applications. Yet, with the proliferation of models and agentic strategies, practitioners face substantial uncertainty in selecting the best configuration for a downstream task. Prior studies show that different agents and backbones exhibit complementary strengths, and that larger models are not always superior, underscoring the need for adaptive routing mechanisms. Existing approaches to agent routing, however, often emphasize cost efficiency while overlooking the fine-grained contextual and relational structure inherent in QA tasks. In this paper, we propose AgentRouter, a framework that formulates multi-agent QA as a knowledge-graph–guided routing problem supervised by empirical performance signals. Specifically, we convert QA instance into a heterogeneous knowledge graph that jointly encodes queries, contextual entities, and agents, and then train a heterogeneous graph neural network (GNN) to propagate information across node types and produce task-aware routing distributions over agents. By leveraging soft supervision and weighted aggregation of agent outputs, AgentRouter learns principled collaboration schemes that capture the complementary strengths of diverse agents. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms single-agent and ensemble baselines, while generalizing across benchmarks and LLM backbones. These results highlight the effectiveness and robustness of graph-supervised multi-agent routing for question answering. Our code repo is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AgentRouter.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced in recent years, scaling up in both parameter count and context length. However, as context windows extend from thousands to hundreds of thousands of tokens, attention computation becomes the dominant source of memory usage and runtime in decoding stages, severely limiting the efficiency and scalability of long-context LLMs. Sparse attention has emerged as a promising solution, reducing complexity by computing attention over only a subset of context tokens. However, the sparse attention for Multi-head Latent Attention(MLA) which is a variant of standard MHA is rarely studied. In this paper, we introduce RoPE-based Blockwise Sparse Attention (RoBSA), a method designed specifically for MLA during the decoding stage of model inference. RoBSA leverages the decoupled nature of RoPE within MLA to implement token selection in a blockwise manner. RoBSA is a lightweight, training-free, and layer-aware algorithm that can be integrated in a plug-and-play fashion. Our method significantly reduces end-to-end inference latency in the decoding stage by up to 2.55x with minimal accuracy loss compared to full attention in long-context scenarios for very large models.

Abstract:
Extracting conditional text embeddings from large language models (LLMs) is a promising paradigm, as it requires neither additional data nor fine-tuning. Existing methods incorporate conditions into prompts to guide LLMs to focus on specific aspects and elicit conditional text embeddings. However, relying solely on prompts often fails to produce high-quality conditional text embeddings, as they remain entangled with general text embeddings, ultimately degrading their quality. To this end, we propose an inference-time, plug-and-play Self-Contrastive Steering (SCS) method that constructs unconditional general text embeddings and uses them to refine conditional text embeddings, making them more focused on the target condition. Specifically, we modify the attention mask and positional encodings to mask the condition, thereby obtaining unconditional text embeddings and intervening in the multi-head self-attention computation process. Notably, our method is highly efficient, requiring only a single additional multi-head self-attention computation at inference time. Extensive experiments on clustering, Semantic Textual Similarity, and triplet alignment datasets demonstrate that our method can seamlessly improve the performance of existing prompt-based methods across different LLMs in a training-free and plug-and-play manner.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly used in urban planning, but since gendered space theory highlights how gender hierarchies are embedded in spatial organization, there is concern that LLMs may reproduce or amplify such biases. We introduce SPAGBias — the first systematic framework to evaluate spatial gender bias in LLMs. It combines a taxonomy of 62 urban micro-spaces, a prompt library, and three diagnostic layers: explicit (forced-choice resampling), probabilistic (token-level asymmetry), and constructional (semantic and narrative role analysis). Testing six representative models, we identify structured gender-space associations that go beyond the public-private divide, forming nuanced micro-level mappings. Story generation reveals how emotion, wording, and social roles jointly shape “spatial gender narratives”. We also examine how prompt design, temperature, and model scale influence bias expression. Tracing experiments indicate that these patterns are embedded and reinforced across the model pipeline (pre-training, instruction tuning, and reward modeling), with model associations found to substantially exceed real-world distributions. Downstream experiments further reveal that such biases produce concrete failures in both normative and descriptive application settings. This work connects sociological theory with computational analysis, extending bias research into the spatial domain and uncovering how LLMs encode social gender cognition through language.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) learn non-trivial abstractions during pretraining, such as detecting irregular plural noun subjects. However, because traditional evaluation methods (e.g., benchmarking) fail to reveal how models acquire these concepts and capabilities, it is not well understood when and how these specific linguistic abilities emerge. To bridge this gap and better understand model training at the concept level, we use sparse crosscoders to discover and align features across model checkpoints. Using this approach, we track the evolution of linguistic features during pretraining. We train crosscoders between open-sourced checkpoint triplets with significant performance and representation shifts, and introduce a novel metric, Relative Indirect Effects (RelIE), to trace training stages at which individual features become causally important for task performance. We show that crosscoders can detect feature emergence, maintenance, and discontinuation during pretraining. Our approach is architecture-agnostic and scalable, offering a promising path toward more interpretable and fine-grained analysis of representation learning throughout pretraining.

Abstract:
Learning structural information from observational data is central to producing new knowledge outside the training corpus. This holds for mechanistic understanding in scientific discovery as well as flexible test-time compositional generation. We thus study how language models learn abstract structures and utilize the learnt structural information at test-time. To ensure a controlled setup, we design a natural language dataset based on linguistic structural transformations. We empirically show that the emergence of learning structural information correlates with complex reasoning tasks, and that the ability to perform test-time compositional generation remains limited.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) can now process extremely long contexts, efficient inference over these extended inputs has become increasingly important, especially for emerging applications like LLM agents that highly depend on this capability. Speculative decoding (SD) offers a promising lossless acceleration technique compared to lossy alternatives such as quantization and model cascades. However, most state-of-the-art SD methods are trained on short texts (typically fewer than 4k tokens), making them unsuitable for long-context scenarios. Specifically, adapting these methods to long contexts presents three key challenges: (1) the excessive memory demands posed by draft models due to large Key-Value (KV) cache; (2) performance degradation resulting from the mismatch between short-context training and long-context inference; and (3) inefficiencies in tree attention mechanisms when managing long token sequences. This work introduces LongSpec, a framework that addresses these challenges through three core innovations: a memory-efficient draft model with a constant-sized KV cache; novel position indices that mitigate the training–inference mismatch; and an attention aggregation strategy that combines fast prefix computation with standard tree attention to enable efficient decoding. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of LongSpec, achieving up to a 3.26x speedup over strong Flash Attention baselines across five long-context understanding datasets, as well as a 2.34x reduction in wall-clock time on four math reasoning tasks with the QwQ model, demonstrating significant latency improvements for long-context applications.

Abstract:
In-Context Learning (ICL) allows large language models to adapt to new tasks from a few demonstrations, but its reliability remains a concern: predictions are highly sensitive to both prompt design and the model’s ability to understand the context, obscuring whether failures arise from data properties or model limitations. Uncertainty decomposition—separating aleatoric from epistemic sources—is particularly crucial in this setting, yet existing methods, designed for standard generation tasks, fail to capture the unique dynamics of ICL. To address this, we introduce a concept of self-function vectors, built upon Bayesian views and the mechanistic interpretability of ICL. These vectors leverage internal model representations to model the latent concept learned during in-context prompting, thereby enabling a direct estimation of aleatoric uncertainty within a Bayesian framework and circumventing the reliance on brittle input or decoding manipulations. Given the lack of established benchmarks and suitable evaluation protocols, we also propose the first and rigorous evaluation framework, initially grounded in synthetic tasks for conceptual development and subsequently extended to real-world datasets, in which aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty can be quantified separately under controlled settings. Moreover, we show it can be used as a practical tool for trustworthy-related applications, such as hallucination detection. Our findings pave a new direction for connecting the quantitative view of uncertainty with the mechanistic understanding of model behavior.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning, often through supervised fine-tuning (SFT). However, SFT is resource-intensive, relying on large curated datasets, rejection-sampled demonstrations, and uniform optimization across all tokens—even though only a fraction carry meaningful learning value. In this work, we explore a counterintuitive idea: can smaller language models (SLMs) teach larger language models (LLMs) by revealing high-value reasoning moments that reflect the latter’s unique strength? We propose LightReasoner, a novel framework that leverages the behavioral divergence between a stronger expert model (LLM) and a weaker amateur model (SLM). LightReasoner operates in two stages: (1) a sampling stage that pinpoints critical reasoning moments and constructs supervision examples capturing the expert’s advantage through expert–amateur contrast, and (2) a fine-tuning stage that aligns the expert model with these distilled examples, amplifying its reasoning strengths. Across seven benchmarks, LightReasoner improves accuracy by up to 28.1%, while reducing time consumption by 90%, sampled problems by 80%, and tuned token usage by 99%, all without relying on ground-truth labels. By turning weaker SLMs into effective teaching signals, LightReasoner offers a scalable and resource-efficient approach for advancing LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce unnecessarily lengthy reasoning traces, which significantly increase computational cost and latency. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed length penalties, but such penalties are hard to tune and fail to adapt to the evolving reasoning abilities of LLMs, leading to suboptimal trade-offs between accuracy and conciseness. To address this challenge, we propose LEASH (adaptive LEngth penAlty and reward SHaping), a reinforcement learning framework for efficient reasoning in LLMs. We formulate length control as a constrained optimization problem and employ a Lagrangian primal–dual method to dynamically adjust the penalty coefficient. When generations exceed the target length, the penalty is intensified; when they are shorter, it is relaxed. This adaptive mechanism guides models toward producing concise reasoning without sacrificing task performance. Experiments on Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 show that LEASH reduces the average reasoning length by 60% across diverse tasks—including in-distribution mathematical reasoning and out-of-distribution domains such as coding and instruction following—while maintaining competitive performance. Our work thus presents a practical and effective paradigm for developing controllable and efficient LLMs that balance reasoning capabilities with computational budgets.

Abstract:
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong potential for zero-shot document ranking, current listwise approaches face three critical limitations. First, context length constraints prevent processing many documents simultaneously. Second, sequential generation creates bottlenecks that cannot run in parallel. Third, ranking results depend heavily on initial document order, leading to inconsistent performance. We introduce BracketRank, a reasoning-driven competitive elimination framework that addresses these challenges through systematic group competition. Our method uses adaptive grouping to automatically optimise group sizes based on LLM context limits, reasoning-enhanced prompts that require explicit relevance explanations, and bracket-style elimination where documents compete through winner and loser brackets. This structure ensures every document has fair advancement opportunities regardless of initial positioning while allowing for parallel processing across competition stages. We evaluate BracketRank on TREC DL 19, TREC DL 20, and eight BEIR benchmark datasets. Results show that BracketRank achieves 77.90 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 19 and 75.85 NDCG@5 on TREC DL 20, outperforming RankGPT and other state-of-the-art methods. On BEIR datasets, BracketRank reaches 54.66 average NDCG@10, demonstrating robust performance across diverse domains.

Abstract:
While mechanistic interpretability (MI) has produced important insights into neural network internals, the field has yet to establish a standardized system to audit experiments. As such, many of its findings remain underutilized in safety-critical applications such as medical AI and autonomous systems, as stakeholders cannot certify their validity. Recent work demonstrates this concretely: two papers found conflicting conclusions for the same behavior, and a third study revealed that both were partially correct but incomparable due to methodological inconsistencies. Without standardized auditing, such ambiguities hinder adoption in high-stakes contexts requiring strong correctness guarantees. We call for the MI community to work towards developing a novel reviewing system that complements peer review via: (1) Continuous reviewing supported by a Collaborative Reviewing Platform where meta-science results and discussions (such as critiques, negative results, post-hoc extensions, reproductions, replications, and partial results) that fit outside of papers are organized and discussed, allowing for comments and revisions to be made at any time (2) Generalizing good practices found on this platform into expert-verified guidelines and protocols to improve auditing efficiency, and (3) Source-based auditing systems that track arguments which claims depend on. This position paper encourages constructive debate over the necessity, design and implementation of such a framework, providing early concrete examples to help catalyze these dialogues. Overall, we propose that auditing MI itself is essential for its application in AI safety, industry, and governance.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have advanced reasoning ability, yet conventional alignment remains dominated by outcome reward models (ORMs) that judge only final answers. Process Reward Models(PRMs) address this gap by evaluating and guiding reasoning at the step or trajectory level. This survey provides a systematic overview of PRMs through the full loop: how to generate process data, build PRMs, and use PRMs for test-time scaling and reinforcement learning. We summarize applications across math, code, text, multimodal reasoning, robotics, and agents, and review emerging benchmarks. Our goal is to clarify design spaces, reveal open challenges, and guide future research toward fine-grained, robust reasoning alignment.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has shown substantial promise in improving factual accuracy by grounding model responses with external knowledge relevant to queries. However, most existing approaches are limited to a text-only corpus, and while recent efforts have extended RAG to other modalities such as images and videos, they typically operate over a single modality-specific corpus. In contrast, real-world queries vary widely in the type of knowledge they require, which a single type of knowledge source cannot address. To address this, we introduce UniversalRAG, an any-to-any RAG framework designed to retrieve and integrate knowledge from heterogeneous sources with diverse modalities and granularities. Specifically, motivated by the observation that forcing all modalities into a unified representation space derived from a single aggregated corpus causes a modality gap, where the retrieval tends to favor items from the same modality as the query, we propose modality-aware routing, which dynamically identifies the most appropriate modality-specific corpus and performs targeted retrieval within it, and further justify its effectiveness with a theoretical analysis. Moreover, beyond modality, we organize each modality into multiple granularity levels, enabling fine-tuned retrieval tailored to the complexity and scope of the query. We validate UniversalRAG on 10 benchmarks of multiple modalities, showing its superiority over various modality-specific and unified baselines.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been effective on tasks with structured solutions like math and coding, but its reliance on simple, rule-based verifiers creates a fundamental bottleneck. We find their applicability is surprisingly narrow even in structured domains, a limitation that is compounded at scale: rule-based systems can paradoxically degrade in performance as multi-domain, free-form training data increases. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new RLVR framework that uses a generative verifier to provide soft, probabilistic rewards. Our key insight is that powerful LLMs show high agreement with human evaluators when judging answer correctness given a ground-truth reference, allowing us to automate reward generation without costly human annotation. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. We show that a compact 7B generative reward model can guide a 7B policy model to decisively outperform models up to 10x its size, including the 72B Qwen2.5-Instruct (by a margin of +8.6%). This effectiveness is robust, holding true across diverse training datasets with answers sourced from experts, web users, and other LLMs, and generalizes strongly to seven out-of-distribution benchmarks. Our work provides a scalable and effective framework for extending RLVR beyond the limitations of pattern-based verification to complex, noisy, real-world domains.

Abstract:
We present SemanticQA, an evaluation suite designed to assess language models (LMs) in semantic phrase processing tasks. The benchmark consolidates existing multiword expression (MwE) resources and reorganizes them into a unified testbed. It covers both general lexical phenomena, such as lexical collocations, and three fine-grained categories: idiomatic expressions, noun compounds, and verbal constructions. Through SemanticQA, we assess LMs of diverse architectures and scales in extraction, classification, and interpretation tasks, as well as sequential task compositions. We reveal substantial performance variation, particularly on tasks requiring semantic reasoning, highlighting differences in reasoning efficacy and semantic understanding of LMs, providing insights for pushing LMs with stronger comprehension on non-trivial semantic phrases. The evaluation harness and data of SemanticQA are available at https://github.com/jacklanda/SemanticQA.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from order bias, where their performance is affected by the arrangement order of input elements. This unfairness limits the model’s applications in scenarios such as in-context learning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Recent studies attempt to obtain optimal or suboptimal arrangements based on statistical results or using dataset-based search, but these methods increase inference overhead while leaving the model’s inherent order bias unresolved. Other studies mitigate order sensitivity through supervised fine-tuning using augmented training sets with multiple order variants, but often at the cost of accuracy, trapping the model in consistent yet incorrect hallucinations. In this paper, we propose D ual G roup A dvantage O ptimization ( DGAO ), which aims to improve model accuracy and order stability simultaneously. DGAO calculates and balances intra-group relative accuracy advantage and inter-group relative stability advantage, rewarding the policy model for generating order-stable and correct outputs while penalizing order-sensitive or incorrect responses. This marks the first time reinforcement learning has been used to mitigate LLMs’ order sensitivity. We also propose two new metrics, Consistency Rate and Overconfidence Rate, to reveal the pseudo-stability of previous methods and guide more comprehensive evaluation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DGAO achieves superior order fairness while improving performance on RAG, mathematical reasoning, and classification tasks. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DGAO-A481/

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet often fail to preserve and effectively leverage visual evidence throughout generation. We identify three fundamental types of visual grounding failures: Long-Context Grounding Error, where visual information gradually decays over long sequences; Fine-Grained Grounding Error, where low-resolution or degraded inputs hinder the recovery of detailed visual information; and Regional Grounding Error, where spatially diffuse attention weakens region-level vision-language alignment. To address these issues, we propose a tool-augmented reasoning framework with three targeted compensation strategies: reuse, which re-injects the original image to mitigate visual forgetting; focus_area, which constrains attention to task-relevant regions; and zoom_in, which enhances visual resolution for fine-grained perception. We further construct the TWI-Tools-146K dataset and develop Simple-VGC, a tool-augmented MLLM that interleaves visual and textual tokens. Extensive experiments show that each tool yields targeted improvements for its corresponding grounding error, while their combination produces synergistic gains in visual reasoning. Beyond performance, our analysis provides mechanistic insights into how tool-based interventions improve visual grounding, pointing toward more reliable multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to perform complex, realistic tasks, yet their ability to utilize the rapidly expanding Model Contextual Protocol (MCP) ecosystem remains limited. Existing MCP research covers few servers, depends on costly manual curation, and lacks training support, hindering progress toward real-world deployment. To overcome these limitations, we introduce MCP-Flow, an automated web-agent-driven pipeline for large-scale server discovery, data synthesis, and model training. MCP-Flow collects and filters data from 1166 servers and 11536 tools, producing 68733 high-quality instruction-function call pairs and 6439 trajectories, far exceeding prior work in scale and diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate MCP-Flow’s effectiveness in driving superior MCP tool selection, function-call generation, and enhanced agentic task performance. MCP-Flow thus provides a scalable foundation for advancing LLM agents’ proficiency in real-world MCP environments.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offers new opportunities for complex scientific challenges, yet their application in earth science—especially at the graduate level—remains underexplored due to a lack of benchmarks reflecting the depth and complexity of geoscientific reasoning. Existing datasets often rely on synthetic data or simple figure-caption pairs, failing to capture the nuanced reasoning required for real-world applications. To address this, we introduce MSEarth, a multimodal scientific dataset and benchmark curated from high-quality, open-access publications. Covering the five major spheres of Earth science—atmosphere, cryosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and biosphere—MSEarth features over 289K figures with refined captions enriched by contextual discussions and reasoning from the original papers. The benchmark supports tasks such as scientific figure captioning, multiple choice questions, and open-ended reasoning, providing a scalable, high-fidelity resource for developing and evaluating MLLMs in scientific reasoning.

Abstract:
Cross-cultural entity translation remains challenging for large language models (LLMs) as literal or phonetic renderings are usually yielded instead of culturally appropriate translations in context. However, relevant knowledge may already be encoded in model parameters during large-scale pre-training. To incentivize the effective use of parametric knowledge, we propose EA-RLVR (Entity-Anchored Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards), a training framework that optimizes cross-cultural entity translation without relying on external knowledge bases. EA-RLVR anchors supervision on a verifiable, entity-level reward signal and incorporates lightweight structural gates to stabilize optimization. This design steers the model toward learning a robust reasoning process rather than merely imitating reference translations. We evaluate EA-RLVR on XC-Translate and observe consistent improvements in both entity translation accuracy and out-of-domain generalization. Specifically, training on merely 7k samples boosts Qwen3-14B’s entity translation accuracy from 23.66% to 31.87% on a 50k test set comprising entirely unseen entities . The learned entity translation ability also transfers to general translation, yielding +1.35 XCOMET on WMT24pp, which scales to +1.59 with extended optimization. Extensive analyses of pass@k dynamics and reward formulations attribute these gains to superior sampling efficiency and a stable optimization landscape.

Abstract:
Iterative refinement is a simple inference-time strategy for machine translation: given an initial translation, an LLM revises it without additional training. Yet document-scale refinement remains poorly understood: 1) which pipelines work best, 2) what quality dimensions improve, and 3) how refiners behave. In this paper, we present a systematic study of document-level literary translation, covering six LLMs and seven language pairs. Across nine translation-refinement granularity combinations and five refinement strategies, a) we find a robust recipe: document-level MT followed by segment-level refinement yields the strongest and most stable improvements. In our setting, doc-level refinement often makes fewer edits and leads to smaller or less reliable gains. Surprisingly, a simple general refinement prompt consistently outperforms error-specific prompting and evaluate-then-refine schemes. b) Fine-grained MQM analyses and professional-translator evaluation show that gains come primarily from fluency, with limited improvements in adequacy. c) Probing translator-refiner strength interactions suggests refinement behaves less like targeted post-editing and more like projecting outputs toward the refiner’s learned distribution while remaining anchored to the initial translation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful assistants for scientific writing. However, concerns remain about the quality and reliability of the generated text, including citation accuracy and faithfulness. While most recent work relies on methods such as LLM-as-a-Judge, the reliability of LLM-as-a-Judge alone is also in doubt. In this work, we reframe citation evaluation as a problem of citation attribution alignment, which assesses whether LLM-generated citations match those a human author would include for the same text. We propose CiteGuard, a retrieval-aware agent framework designed to provide more faithful grounding for citation validation. CiteGuard improves over the prior baseline by 10 percentage points and achieves up to 68.1% accuracy on the CiteME benchmark, approaching human performance (69.2%). It also identifies alternative valid citations and demonstrates generalization ability for cross-domain citation attribution.

Abstract:
Individuals’ concerns about data privacy and AI safety are highly contextualized and extend beyond sensitive patterns. Addressing these issues requires reasoning about the context to identify and mitigate potential risks. Though researchers have widely explored using large language models (LLMs) as evaluators for contextualized safety and privacy assessments, these efforts typically assume the availability of complete and clear context, whereas real-world contexts tend to be ambiguous and incomplete. In this paper, we propose ContextLens, a semi-rule-based framework that leverages LLMs to ground the input context in the legal domain and explicitly identify both known and unknown factors for legal compliance. Instead of directly assessing safety outcomes, our ContextLens instructs LLMs to answer a set of crafted questions that span over applicability, general principles and detailed provisions to assess compliance with pre-defined priorities and rules. We conduct extensive experiments on existing compliance benchmarks that cover the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the EU AI Act. The results suggest that our ContextLens can significantly improve LLMs’ compliance assessment and surpass existing baselines without any training. Additionally, our ContextLens can further identify the ambiguous and missing factors.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has become a cornerstone of reasoning in large language models, yet its effectiveness is constrained by the limited expressiveness of discrete token sampling. Recent latent reasoning approaches attempt to alleviate this limitation by replacing discrete tokens with soft embeddings (probability-weighted mixtures of token embeddings) or hidden states, but they commonly suffer from two issues: (1) global activation injects perturbations into high-confidence steps, impairing reasoning stability; and (2) soft embeddings quickly collapse toward the highest-probability token, limiting exploration of alternative trajectories. To address these challenges, we propose SeLaR (Selective Latent Reasoning), a lightweight and training-free framework. SeLaR introduces an entropy-gated mechanism that activates soft embeddings only at low-confidence steps, while preserving discrete decoding at high-confidence steps. Additionally, we propose an entropy-aware contrastive regularization that pushes soft embeddings away from the highest-probability token’s direction, encouraging sustained exploration of multiple latent reasoning paths. Experiments on five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SeLaR consistently outperforms standard CoT and state-of-the-art training-free methods.

Abstract:
Empathetic dialogue requires not only recognizing a user’s emotional state but also making strategy-aware, context-sensitive decisions throughout response generation.However, the lack of a comprehensive empathy strategy framework, explicit task-aligned multi-stage reasoning, and high-quality strategy-aware data fundamentally limits existing approaches, preventing them from effectively modeling empathetic dialogue as a complex, multi-stage cognitive and decision-making process.To address these challenges, we propose STRIDE-ED, a STRategy-grounded, Interpretable, and DEep reasoning framework that models Empathetic Dialogue through structured, strategy-conditioned reasoning.To support effective learning, we develop a strategy-aware data refinement pipeline integrating LLM-based annotation, multi-model consistency-weighted evaluation, and dynamic sampling to construct high-quality training data aligned with empathetic strategies.Furthermore, we adopt a two-stage training paradigm that combines supervised fine-tuning with multi-objective reinforcement learning to better align model behaviors with target emotions, empathetic strategies, and response formats.Extensive experiments demonstrate that STRIDE-ED generalizes across diverse open-source LLMs and consistently outperforms existing methods on both automatic metrics and human evaluations.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel at visual understanding but face severe computational bottlenecks when processing high-resolution images and long videos due to massive visual token counts. Token pruning mitigates this by selectively removing less informative tokens while maintaining performance. However, existing methods vary widely in pruning location (vision encoder vs. LLM decoder), importance criteria (attention vs. similarity vs. learned scores), and application strategy, lacking systematic comparison. This survey presents the first comprehensive review of token pruning for LVLMs. We propose a taxonomy categorizing methods into vision-side, LLM-side, and hybrid paradigms, systematically analyze token selection mechanisms and pruning strategy. We further discuss evaluation protocols and identify key challenges including prompt-adaptive pruning and hardware-aware design. Our survey provides a structured foundation for this rapidly growing research area.

Abstract:
Temporal reasoning remains a critical challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly when it requires encompassing relational dependencies and numerical constraints. Yet, existing benchmarks largely overlook the joint consideration of these two dimensions and primarily rely on single-task evaluation paradigms, making it difficult to assess whether correct answers reflect grounded reasoning or arise from superficial statistical recall. To address these gaps, we introduce TNR, a benchmark designed to evaluate both Temporal Numerical and Relational reasoning. We propose a bi-directional evaluation framework consisting of forward generation via Question Answering (QA) and backward verification via Fact Verification (FV). By measuring the alignment between QA and FV, we introduce a Consistency Rate to quantify the robustness of reasoning across these two directions. Experiments on a range of LLMs reveal notable discrepancies between QA and FV performance, particularly in numerical and interval-based tasks. Moreover, our bi-directional error analysis demonstrates that these inconsistencies often stem from heuristic shortcuts and statistical co-occurrences rather than grounded logical deduction, flaws that are frequently masked in standard single-task evaluations.

Abstract:
Generative recommendation with large language models (LLMs) reframes prediction as sequence generation, yet existing LLM-based recommenders remain limited in leveraging geographic signals that are crucial in mobility and local-services scenarios. Here, we present Reasoning Over Space (ROS), a framework that utilizes geography as a vital decision variable within the reasoning process. ROS introduces a Hierarchical Spatial Semantic ID (SID) that discretizes coarse-to-fine locality and POI semantics into compositional tokens, and endows LLM with a three-stage Mobility Chain-of-Thought (CoT) paradigm that models user personality, constructs an intent-aligned candidate space, and performs locality informed pruning. We further align the model with real world geography via spatial-guided Reinforcement Learning (RL). Experiments on three widely used location-based social network (LBSN) datasets show that ROS achieves over 10% relative gains in hit rate over strongest LLM-based baselines and improves cross-city transfer, despite using a smaller backbone model.

Abstract:
Chart reasoning is a critical capability for Vision Language Models (VLMs). However, the development of open-source models is severely hindered by the lack of high-quality training data. Existing datasets suffer from a dual challenge: synthetic charts are often simplistic and repetitive, while the associated QA pairs are prone to hallucinations and lack the reasoning depth required for complex tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose ChartVerse, a scalable framework designed to synthesize complex charts and reliable reasoning data from scratch. (1) To address the bottleneck of simple patterns, we first introduce Rollout Posterior Entropy (RPE), a novel metric that quantifies chart complexity. Guided by RPE, we develop complexity-aware chart coder to autonomously synthesize diverse, high-complexity charts via executable programs. (2) To guarantee reasoning rigor, we develop truth-anchored inverse QA synthesis. Diverging from standard generation, we adopt an answer-first paradigm: we extract deterministic answers directly from the source code, generate questions conditional on these anchors, and enforce strict consistency verification. To further elevate difficulty and reasoning depth, we filter samples based on model fail-rate and distill high-quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. We curate ChartVerse-SFT-600K and ChartVerse-RL-40K using Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking as the teacher. Experimental results demonstrate that ChartVerse-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance, notably surpassing its teacher and rivaling the stronger Qwen3-32B-Thinking.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by using a draft model to propose token candidates for parallel verification by the target model. However, current state-of-the-art self-distilled draft models adopt a homogeneous architecture across all drafting positions, failing to account for a critical empirical observation: the expected utility of drafting decays rapidly after the initial positions. To exploit this imbalance, we propose Two-tier Horizontal Cascade Speculative Decoding (HCSpec), a novel framework that organizes heterogeneous, position-specialized draft modules into a horizontal cascade. The first tier employs a dual-layer, dual-path transformer that enhances early-step fidelity by decoupling token-logit prediction from recurrent feature propagation, while the second tier adopts a lightweight single-layer transformer that deliberately trades marginal accuracy for improved efficiency at later drafting steps. Extensive experiments on Qwen series models and Llama3.1-8B-Instruct, across multiple tasks and diverse inference configurations, demonstrate that HCSpec consistently outperforms the previous state-of-the-art (EAGLE-3). It delivers 15–30% higher end-to-end speedup over EAGLE-3 and achieves up to 3.72x acceleration over vanilla autoregressive decoding. Our code is provided in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Agentic learning increasingly hinges on interaction, yet real-world experience is expensive, limited, and often irreversible at inference time. World models promise to mitigate these limitations, but it remains unclear whether large language models can actually serve as reliable world models, and deliver concrete benefits to downstream agents. We investigate these questions in text-based environments, a controlled testbed that reframes language modeling as next-state prediction under interaction. We propose a three-level framework to evaluate LLM-based world models: (i) fidelity and consistency, (ii) scalability and robustness, and (iii) agent utility. Across five representative environments, we show that sufficiently trained world models capture coherent environment dynamics, scale predictably with data and model capacity, and unlock tangible agent improvements—for example, action verification boosts GPT-4o by 5.5% on WebShop, and warm-started RL achieves a 15% gain on SciWorld. Crucially, these benefits hinge on behavioral coverage and environment complexity, sharply characterizing when world modeling meaningfully advances agent learning.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) routing is a pivotal technique for navigating a diverse landscape of LLMs, enabling the selection of the best-performing LLMs for specific user queries while balancing performance and cost. However, current routing approaches often face limitations in scalability when dealing with a large pool of specialized LLMs, or in their adaptability to extending model scope and evolving capability domains. To overcome those challenges, we propose InferenceDynamics, a flexible and scalable multi-dimensional routing framework by modeling the capability and knowledge of models. We operate it on our comprehensive dataset RouteMix, and demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability in group-level routing using modern benchmarks including MMLU-Pro, GPQA, BigGenBench, and LiveBench, showcasing its ability to identify and leverage top-performing models for given tasks, leading to superior outcomes with cost efficiency. The broader adoption of InferenceDynamics can empower users to harness the full specialized potential of the LLM ecosystem, and our code will be made publicly available to encourage further research.

Abstract:
The emergence of fine-grained numerical formats like NVFP4 presents new opportunities for efficient Large Language Model (LLM) inference. However, it is difficult to adapt existing Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) strategies to these formats: rotation-based methods compromise fine-grained block isolation; smoothing techniques struggle with significant 4-bit quantization errors; and mixed-precision approaches often conflict with hardware constraints on unified-precision computation. To address these challenges, we propose ARCQuant, a framework that boosts NVFP4 performance via Augmented Residual Channels. Distinct from methods that compromise block isolation or hardware uniformity, ARCQuant maintains a strictly unified NVFP4 format by augmenting the activation matrix with quantized residual channels. This design integrates the error compensation process directly into the matrix reduction dimension, enabling the use of standard, highly optimized GEMM kernels with minimal overhead. Theoretical analysis confirms that the worst-case error bound of our dual-stage NVFP4 quantization is comparable to that of standard 8-bit formats such as MXFP8. Extensive experiments on LLaMA and Qwen models demonstrate that ARCQuant achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, comparable to full-precision baselines in perplexity and downstream tasks. Furthermore, deployment on RTX 5090 and RTX PRO 6000 GPUs confirms practical benefits, achieving up to 3× speedup over FP16. Our code is available at https://github.com/actypedef/ARCQuant.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to automate real-world vulnerability detection due to two key limitations: the heterogeneity of vulnerability patterns undermines the effectiveness of a single unified model, and manual prompt engineering for massive weakness categories is unscalable.To address these challenges, we propose MulVul, a retrieval-augmented multi-agent framework designed for precise and broad-coverage vulnerability detection. MulVul adopts a coarse-to-fine strategy: a Router agent first predicts the top- coarse categories and then forwards the input to specialized Detector agents, which identify the exact vulnerability types. Both agents use evidence retrieved from vulnerability knowledge bases to mitigate hallucinations. Crucially, to automate the generation of specialized prompts, we design Cross-Model Prompt Evolution, a prompt optimization mechanism where a generator LLM iteratively refines candidate prompts while a distinct executor LLM validates their effectiveness. This decoupling mitigates the self-correction bias inherent in single-model optimization. Evaluated on 130 CWE types, MulVul achieves 34.79% Macro-F1, outperforming the best baseline by 41.5%. Ablation studies validate cross-model prompt evolution, which boosts performance by 51.6% over manual prompts by effectively handling diverse vulnerability patterns.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, evaluating repository-level reasoning, the ability to maintain logical consistency across massive, real-world, interdependent file systems, has become critical. Current benchmarks typically fluctuate between isolated code snippets and black-box evaluations. We present RepoReason, a white-box diagnostic benchmark centered on abductive assertion verification. To eliminate memorization while preserving authentic logical depth, we implement an execution-driven mutation framework that utilizes the environment as a semantic oracle to regenerate ground-truth states. Furthermore, we establish a fine-grained diagnostic system using dynamic program slicing, quantifying reasoning via three orthogonal metrics: ESV (reading load), MCL (simulation depth), and DFI (integration width). Comprehensive evaluations of frontier models (e.g., Claude-4.5-Sonnet, DeepSeek-v3.1-Terminus) reveal a prevalent aggregation deficit, where integration width serves as the primary cognitive bottleneck. Our findings provide granular white-box insights for optimizing the next generation of agentic software engineering.

Abstract:
Compositional generalization tests are often used to estimate the compositionality of LLMs. However, such tests have the following limitations: (1) they only focus on the output results without considering LLMs’ understanding of sample compositionality, resulting in explainability defects; (2) they rely on dataset partition to form the test set with combinations unseen in the training set, suffering from combination leakage issues. In this work, we propose a novel rule-generation perspective for compositionality estimation for LLMs. It requires LLMs to generate a program as rules for dataset mapping and provides estimates of the compositionality of LLMs using complexity-based theory. The perspective addresses the limitations of compositional generalization tests and provides a new way to analyze the compositionality characterization of LLMs. We conduct experiments and analysis of existing advanced LLMs based on this perspective on a string-to-grid task, and find various compositionality characterizations and compositionality deficiencies exhibited by LLMs.

Abstract:
Existing video summarization methods mainly compress content for gist browsing, but they often break the prerequisite logic in instructional videos and induce logical inversions (e.g., conclusions before premises). We formalize this problem as Structure-Pedagogical Reconstruction (SPR). SPR raises two challenges: (1) Structure Hallucination, where retrieved knowledge is topologically valid but not evidence-grounded by the blackboard; and (2) Logical Inversion, where soft prompt-level graph injection fails to enforce prerequisite order during decoding. To address these challenges, we propose Knowledge-Centric Video Reconstruction (KCVR), a Plan-then-Generate neuro-symbolic framework that decouples epistemic planning from content generation. KCVR prunes a Dual-Layer Epistemic Graph into a minimal video-supported plan, then realizes the plan with visually anchored attention and topology-constrained decoding. We additionally release EduStruct, a 10-discipline benchmark for SPR and structure-centric evaluation. Experiments show that KCVR outperforms strong end-to-end baselines on Knowledge Progression Consistency and Learning Objective Coverage. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/mark1001-ljj/video_sum .

Abstract:
Training Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is costly and resource-intensive, making them valuable assets. To prevent malicious users from unauthorized commercialization of these artificial intelligence assets through fine-tuning and black-box deployment, model fingerprinting techniques aimed at verifying the ownership of LVLMs are receiving widespread attention. Existing fingerprinting techniques rely on adversarial attacks or backdoor attacks to construct trigger images for specific outputs, attributing model ownership by comparing whether the output of trigger images on suspected models matches the predetermined output. However, these methods depend on fixed-form triggers as explicit model fingerprints, which have limitations in terms of stealthiness and robustness. Inspired by unlearning research, we propose Unlearning-based Multimodal Memorization Fingerprint (UMMF). UMMF strengthens the overfitting characteristics of training samples by unlearning neighboring samples of the training samples, thereby introducing detectable regions of poor generalization in the data manifold. Compared with previous methods, our approach leverages the differences in memorization strength of LVLMs on neighboring samples as implicit model fingerprints, rather than relying on specific input-output pairs as explicit triggers. This endows it with stronger stealthiness, robustness, and adaptability. To simulate real application scenarios, we conduct extensive experiments using multiple strategies and different datasets, further demonstrating its superiority in protecting LVLM ownership.

Abstract:
Computer-using agents powered by Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated human-like capabilities in operating digital environments like mobile platforms. While these agents hold great promise for advancing digital automation, their potential for unsafe operations, such as system compromise and privacy leakage, is raising significant concerns. Detecting these safety concerns across the vast and complex operational space of mobile environments presents a formidable challenge that remains critically underexplored. To establish a foundation for mobile agent safety research, we introduce MobileRisk-Live, a dynamic sandbox environment accompanied by a safety detection benchmark comprising realistic trajectories with fine-grained annotations. Built upon this, we propose OS-Sentinel, a novel hybrid safety detection framework that synergistically combines a Formal Verifier for detecting explicit system-level violations with a VLM-based Contextual Judge for assessing contextual risks and agent actions. Experiments show that achieves 10%–30% improvements over existing approaches across multiple metrics. Further analysis provides critical insights that foster the development of safer and more reliable autonomous mobile agents. Our code, environment, and data are available at https://qiushisun.github.io/OS-Sentinel-Home/.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in long-form generation, yet their application is hindered by the hallucination problem. While Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is essential for assessing reliability, the complex structure makes reliable aggregation across heterogeneous themes difficult, in addition, existing methods often overlook the nuance of neutral information and suffer from the high computational cost of fine-grained decomposition. To address these challenges, we propose AGSC (Adaptive Granularity and GMM-based Semantic Clustering), a UQ framework tailored for long-form generation. AGSC first uses NLI neutral probabilities as triggers to distinguish irrelevance from uncertainty, reducing unnecessary computation. It then applies Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) soft clustering to model latent semantic themes and assign topic-aware weights for downstream aggregation. Experiments on BIO and LongFact show that AGSC achieves state-of-the-art correlation with factuality while reducing inference time by about 60% compared to full atomic decomposition.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a dominant architecture for scaling large language models due to their sparse activation mechanism. However, the substantial number of expert activations creates a critical latency bottleneck during inference, especially in resource-constrained deployment scenarios. Existing approaches that reduce expert activations potentially lead to severe model performance degradation. In this work, we introduce the concept of activation budget as a constraint on the number of expert activations and propose Alloc-MoE, a unified framework that optimizes budget allocation coordinately at both the layer and token levels to minimize performance degradation. At the layer level, we introduce Alloc-L, which leverages sensitivity profiling and dynamic programming to determine the optimal allocation of expert activations across layers. At the token level, we propose Alloc-T, which dynamically redistributes activations based on routing scores, optimizing budget allocation without increasing latency. Extensive experiments across multiple MoE models demonstrate that Alloc-MoE maintains model performance under a constrained activation budget. Especially, Alloc-MoE achieves 1.15× prefill and 1.34× decode speedups on DeepSeek-V2-Lite at half of the original budget.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning-as-a-service, while commercially successful for Large Language Model (LLM) providers, exposes models to harmful fine-tuning attacks. As a widely explored defense paradigm against such attacks, unlearning attempts to remove malicious knowledge from LLMs, thereby essentially preventing them from being used to perform malicious tasks. However, we highlight a critical flaw: the inherent general adaptability of LLMs allows them to easily bypass selective unlearning by rapidly relearning or repurposing their general capabilities for harmful tasks. To address this fundamental limitation, we propose a paradigm shift: instead of selective removal, we advocate for inducing model collapse, effectively forcing the model to ”unlearn everything”, specifically in response to updates characteristic of malicious adaptation. This collapse directly neutralizes the very general capabilities that attackers exploit, tackling the core issue unaddressed by selective unlearning. We introduce the Collapse Trap (CTRAP) as a practical mechanism to implement this concept conditionally. Embedded during alignment, CTRAP pre-configures the model’s reaction to subsequent fine-tuning dynamics. If updates during fine-tuning constitute a persistent attempt to reverse safety alignment, the pre-configured trap triggers a progressive degradation of the model’s core language modeling abilities, ultimately rendering it inert and useless for the attacker. Crucially, this collapse mechanism remains dormant during benign fine-tuning, ensuring the model’s utility and general capabilities are preserved.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to legal domain-specific tasks, evaluating their ability to perform legal work in real-world settings has become essential. However, existing legal benchmarks rely on simplified and highly standardized tasks, failing to capture the ambiguity, complexity, and reasoning demands of real legal practice. Moreover, prior evaluations often adopt coarse, single-dimensional metrics and do not explicitly assess fine-grained legal reasoning. To address these limitations, we introduce PLawBench, a Practical Law Benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic legal practice scenarios. Grounded in real-world legal workflows, PLawBench models the core processes of legal practitioners through three task categories: public legal consultation, practical case analysis, and legal document generation. These tasks assess a model’s ability to identify legal issues and key facts, perform structured legal reasoning, and generate legally coherent documents. PLawBench comprises 850 questions across 13 practical legal scenarios, with each question accompanied by expert-designed evaluation rubrics, resulting in approximately 12,500 rubric items for fine-grained assessment. Using an LLM-based evaluator aligned with human expert judgments, we evaluate 10 state-of-the-art LLMs. Experimental results show that none achieves strong performance on PLawBench, revealing substantial limitations in the fine-grained legal reasoning capabilities of current LLMs and highlighting important directions for future evaluation and development of legal LLMs. Data is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PLawbench-B524/ .

Abstract:
Do large language models (LLMs) truly acquire embodied cognition and cultural conventions from text? We introduce demonstratives, fundamental spatial expressions like “this/that” in English and “这/那” in Chinese, as a novel probe for grounded knowledge. Using 6,400 responses from 320 native speakers, we establish a human baseline: English speakers reliably distinguish proximal–distal referents but struggle with perspective-taking, while Chinese speakers switch perspectives fluently but tolerate distal ambiguity. In contrast, five state-of-the-art LLMs fail to inherently understand the proximal–distal contrast and show no cultural differences, defaulting to English-centric reasoning. Our study contributes (i) demonstratives as a new lens for evaluating embodied cognition and cultural conventions, (ii) empirical evidence of cross-cultural asymmetries in human interpretation, (iii) a new perspective on the egocentric–sociocentric debate, showing both orientations coexist but vary across languages, and (iv) a call to address individual variation in future model design.

Abstract:
Open-weight large language models (LLMs) enable broad customization, but also increase exposure to post-release misuse, including malicious fine-tuning (MFT). To mitigate this risk, many prior defenses aim to improve the robustness of open-weight models to MFT by constraining adversarial fine-tuning dynamics in parameter space or mitigating harmful information encoded in internal representations. Nevertheless, since malicious fine-tuning can still erode safety, developing robust safeguards for open-weight models that fundamentally mitigate this risk remains an open research problem. In this paper, we characterize a safety region for open-weight LLMs and propose Safety Guidance Trigger (SGT), which guides fine-tuning toward the safety manifold to preserve alignment. SGT has two stages: (1) optimizing a safety trigger that steers the base model toward safe responses and (2) training the open-weight model to align its internal features with trigger-induced safety representations. We demonstrate that SGT substantially improves robustness against malicious fine-tuning, requiring adversaries to increase their data budget significantly to compromise safety. Our analysis shows that SGT anchors model representations to a safety region, which remains stable under malicious fine-tuning.

Abstract:
With the rapid advancement of post-training techniques for reasoning and information seeking, large language models (LLMs) can incorporate a large quantity of retrieved knowledge to solve complex tasks. However, the limited context window of LLMs obstructs scaling the amount of external knowledge input, prohibiting further improvement. Existing context window extension methods inevitably cause information loss. LLM-based multi-agent methods emerge as a new paradigm to handle massive input in a distributional manner, where we identify two core bottlenecks in existing agent orchestration designs. In this work, we develop a multi-agent framework, ExtAgents, to overcome the bottlenecks and enable better scalability in inference-time knowledge integration without longer-context training. Benchmarked with our enhanced multi-hop question answering test, ∞ Bench+, and other public test sets including long survey generation, ExtAgents significantly enhances the performance over existing non-training methods with the same amount of external knowledge input, regardless of whether it falls within or exceeds the context window. Moreover, the method maintains efficiency due to high parallelism. We believe further study in the coordination of LLM agents on increasing external knowledge input could benefit real-world applications.

Abstract:
Generative recommendation, which directly generates item identifiers, has emerged as a promising paradigm for recommendation systems. However, this left-to-right paradigm inherently biases the model towards local contexts, failing to capture deeper historical dependencies necessary for understanding complex user intents.To address this limitation, we propose Masked History Learning (MHL), a novel training framework that shifts the objective from simple next-step prediction to deep comprehension of history. MHL augments the standard autoregressive objective with an auxiliary task of reconstructing masked historical items, compelling the model to understand "why” an item path is formed from the user’s past behaviors, rather than just "what” item comes next.We introduce two key contributions to enhance this framework: (1) an entropy-guided masking policy that intelligently targets the most informative historical items for reconstruction, and (2) a curriculum learning scheduler that progressively transitions from history reconstruction to future prediction.Experiments on three public datasets show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art generative models, highlighting that a comprehensive understanding of the past is crucial for accurately predicting a user’s future path. The code is available at https://github.com/CQU-MM-Intelligent-Lab/MHL.

Abstract:
Understanding complete musical scores entails integrated reasoning over pitch, rhythm, harmony, and large-scale structure, yet the ability of Large Language Models and Vision–Language Models to interpret full musical notation remains insufficiently examined.We introduce Musical Score Understanding Benchmark (MSU-Bench), a human-curated benchmark for score-level musical understanding across textual (ABC notation) and visual (PDF) modalities. MSU-Bench contains 1,800 generative question–answer pairs from works by Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, Debussy, and others, organised into four levels of increasing difficulty, ranging from onset information to texture and form. Evaluations of more than fifteen state-of-the-art models, in both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings, reveal pronounced modality gaps, unstable level-wise performance, and challenges in maintaining multilevel correctness. Fine-tuning substantially improves results across modalities while preserving general knowledge, positioning MSU-Bench as a robust foundation for future research in multimodal reasoning. The benchmark and code are available at https://github.com/Congren-Dai/MSU-Bench.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, which can elicit harmful responses from MLLMs. Many MLLMs support multi-image inputs, inadvertently introducing new vulnerabilities due to less efforts on multi-image safety alignment. Previous MLLM jailbreak methods only uses a single image, which restricts the attack space: they cannot distribute harmful requests across multiple images, carry abundant information, or exploit additional visual reasoning tasks to distract MLLMs. To address these limitations, in this paper, we propose a compositional jailbreak framework, DMN , which leverages D istributed instruction, M ultimodal evidence and a N umber chain task to fully enhance the jailbreak performance. Extensive experiments show that DMN is highly effective for MLLM jailbreaking, e.g. achieving attack success rates of over 90% on GPT-4o, Gemini-2.5-pro and Claude Sonnet 4, surpassing other baselines by a large margin. This compositional, multi-image jailbreak strategy reveals fundamental weaknesses in their safety mechanisms.

Abstract:
Lifting stripped and highly optimized binaries to the canonical compiler intermediate representation (IR) enables program analysis when source code is unavailable. However, compiler optimizations severely distort control-flow and data-flow structure, making existing rule-based and LLM-based decompilation approaches brittle. We present BRIDGE, a system that reliably lifts optimized binaries to analysis-friendly compiler IR. BRIDGE combines control-flow-aware retrieval-augmented generation with feedback-driven verification. It uses pseudo-probe instrumentation to align optimized binary fragments with normalized IR semantics, and then employs an iterative refinement loop guided by static analysis and runtime feedback to improve executability and semantic consistency. We evaluate BRIDGE on HumanEval-Decompile and MBPP, lifting x86-64 and ARM64 binaries to LLVM IR. BRIDGE outperforms seven baselines, achieving an average of over 30% higher re-executability than the strongest general-purpose LLM baseline.

Abstract:
Efficient long-context inference remains a major challenge for large language models (LLMs), as the cost of attention computation during auto-regressive decoding grows linearly with the context length. Recent sparse attention methods attempt to reduce the computational burden by selecting a subset of tokens at each step, while most rely on static importance scores that are repeatedly computed over the entire cache, overlooking the relational dynamics of the decoding process. In this work, we revisit sparse attention in LLMs and propose to model token importance as a dynamic process that evolves over decoding steps and propagates through model layers. To efficiently measure token importance, we propose two lightweight mechanisms: (1) Cross-Step Accumulation, which incrementally maintains long-term, query-agnostic importance via decayed accumulation of sparse attention scores, avoiding recomputing the importance of decoded tokens; and (2) Cross-Layer Propagation, which leverages the model’s intrinsic Retrieval Heads to compute query-aware indices and efficiently propagate them across layers; Together, these mechanisms preserve both stable context memory and adaptive query relevance while reduce redundant computation. We evaluate our approach on PG-19, RULER, LongBench, and mathematical reasoning benchmarks using models employing Multi-Head and Grouped-Query Attention. Under varying KV cache budgets, our method consistently outperforms prior sparse attention baselines, approaches full attention performance in most settings, and achieves speedups of up to 5.36 × for attention latency and 2.33 × for end-to-end decoding. Our code is available at: https://github.com/iLearn-Lab/ACL26-EvoSparse.

Abstract:
Automated prompt optimization is crucial for eliciting reliable reasoning from large language models (LLMs), yet most API-only prompt optimizers iteratively edit monolithic prompts, coupling components and obscuring credit assignment, limiting controllability, and wasting tokens. We propose Adaptive Prompt Structure Factorization (aPSF), an API-only framework (prompt-in/text-out; no access to model internals) that uses an Architect model to discover task-specific prompt structures as semantic factors. aPSF then performs interventional, single-factor updates: interventional factor-level scoring estimates each factor’s marginal contribution via validation-performance changes, and error-guided factor selection routes updates to the current dominant failure source for more sample-efficient optimization. Across multiple advanced reasoning benchmarks, aPSF outperforms strong baselines, improving accuracy by up to +4.29 percentage points on average, and reduces optimization cost by 45–87% tokens on MultiArith while reaching peak validation in 1 step.

Abstract:
While LLMs are powerful embedding backbones, their application in training-free settings faces two structural challenges: causal attention restricts early tokens from accessing subsequent context, and the next-token prediction objective biases representations toward generation rather than semantic compression. To address these limitations, we propose KV-Embedding, a framework that activates the latent representation power of frozen LLMs. Our method leverages the observation that the key-value (KV) states of the final token at each layer encode a compressed view of the sequence. By re-routing these states as a prepended prefix, we enable all tokens to access sequence-level context within a single forward pass. To ensure model-agnostic applicability, we introduce an automated layer selection strategy based on intrinsic dimensionality. Evaluations on MTEB across Qwen, Mistral, and Llama backbones show that KV-Embedding outperforms existing training-free baselines by up to 10%, while maintaining robust performance on sequences up to 4,096 tokens. These results demonstrate that internal state manipulation offers an efficient alternative to input modification, and we hope this work encourages further exploration of LLM internals for representation learning.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Agents (MoA) improves LLM performance through layered collaboration, but its dense topology raises costs and latency. Existing methods employ LLM judges to filter responses, yet still require all models to perform inference before judging, failing to cut costs effectively. They also lack model selection criteria and struggle with large model pools, where full inference is costly and can exceed context limits. To address this, we propose RouteMoA, an efficient mixture-of-agents framework with dynamic routing. It employs a lightweight scorer to perform initial screening by predicting coarse-grained performance from the query, narrowing candidates to a high-potential subset without inference. A mixture of judges then refines these scores through lightweight self- and cross-assessment based on existing model outputs, providing posterior correction without additional inference. Finally, a model ranking mechanism selects models by balancing performance, cost, and latency. RouteMoA outperforms MoA across varying tasks and model pool sizes, reducing cost by 89.8% and latency by 63.6% in the large-scale model pool. Code is available at https://github.com/Jize-W/RouteMoA.

Abstract:
Stereotype bias in language models has been widely examined in English, but remains largely understudied in bilingual contexts where multiple linguistic and cultural systems interact. This gap is especially important in regions where language use reflects complex historical and sociopolitical influences. In this work, we focus on Kazakhstan, a bilingual society where Kazakh, a low-resource Turkic language, and Russian, a high-resource Slavic language, are both actively used and frequently code-mixed in everyday communication. We introduce Aqbileq, a high-quality, human-verified dataset consisting of 5,634 stereotype-bearing statements in Kazakh, Russian, and code-mixed forms, covering six culturally salient domains. We evaluate both multilingual and Kazakh-specific language models using perplexity-based scoring and pretraining simulations, and find that stereotype bias is most pronounced in code-mixed inputs. Our results highlight the limitations of existing evaluation frameworks and emphasize the need for culturally grounded, linguistically inclusive benchmarks to better assess and mitigate bias in language models.

Abstract:
Predicting corporate earnings surprises is a profitable yet challenging task, as accurate forecasts can inform significant investment decisions. However, progress in this domain has been constrained by a reliance on expensive, proprietary, and text-only data, limiting the development of advanced models. To address this gap, we introduce FinCall-Surprise (Financial Conference Call for Earning Surprise Prediction), the first large-scale, open-source, and multi-modal dataset for earnings surprise prediction. Comprising 2,688 unique corporate conference calls from 2019 to 2021, our dataset features word-to-word conference call textual transcripts, full audio recordings, and corresponding presentation slides. We establish a comprehensive benchmark by evaluating 26 state-of-the-art unimodal and multi-modal LLMs. Our findings reveal that (1) while many models achieve high accuracy, this performance is often an illusion caused by significant class imbalance in the real-world data. (2) Some specialized financial models demonstrate unexpected weaknesses in instruction-following and language generation. (3) Although incorporating audio and visual modalities provides some performance gains, current models still struggle to leverage these signals effectively. These results highlight critical limitations in the financial reasoning capabilities of existing LLMs and establish a challenging new baseline for future research.

Abstract:
While Vision–language models (VLMs) interpret text-rich images effectively, they struggle with reasoning across long, multi-page documents. We present A ctive 𝐋 ong 𝐃 ocum 𝐄 nt 𝐍 avigation (ALDEN), a multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that fine-tunes VLMs as interactive agents capable of actively navigating long, visually rich documents rather than passive readers. ALDEN features a novel fetch action that allows direct page indexing, complementing the classic search action and better exploiting document structure. To ensure training efficiency and stability, we introduce a rule-based cross-level reward for dense supervision and a visual-semantic anchoring mechanism utilizing dual-path KL-divergence constraints. We train ALDEN on a curated corpus built from open-source datasets where trivial samples are filtered, and queries are rewritten to incentivize multi-turn navigation and fetch usage. Empirically, ALDEN achieves state-of-the-art results on five long-document benchmarks, offering a more accurate and efficient path for long-document understanding.

Abstract:
Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle with 3D spatial reasoning, as they fail to construct structured abstractions of the 3D environment depicted in video inputs. To bridge this gap, drawing inspiration from cognitive theories of allocentric spatial reasoning, we investigate how to enable MLLMs to model and reason over text-based spatial representations of video. Specifically, we introduce Textual Representation of Allocentric Context from Egocentric Video (TRACE), a prompting method that induces MLLMs to generate text-based representations of 3D environments as intermediate reasoning traces for more accurate spatial question answering. TRACE encodes meta-context, camera trajectories, and detailed object entities to support structured spatial reasoning over egocentric videos. Extensive experiments on VSI-Bench and OST-Bench demonstrate that TRACE yields notable and consistent improvements over prior prompting strategies across a diverse range of MLLM backbones, spanning different parameter scales and training schemas. We further present ablation studies to validate our design choices, along with detailed analyses that probe the bottlenecks of 3D spatial reasoning in MLLMs.

Abstract:
Prior studies have shown that distinguishing text generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) from human-written one is highly challenging for humans, and often no better than random guessing. To verify the generalizability of this finding across languages and domains, we perform an extensive case study to identify the upper bound of human detection accuracy. Across 16 datasets covering 9 languages and 9 domains, 19 annotators achieved an average detection accuracy of 87.6%, thus challenging previous conclusions. We find that major gaps between human and machine text lie in concreteness, cultural nuances, and diversity. Prompting by explicitly explaining the distinctions in the prompts can partially bridge the gaps in over 50% of the cases. However, we also find that humans do not always prefer human-written text, particularly when they cannot clearly identify its source. We release our dataset, the human labels, and the annotator metadata at https://github.com/xnlp-lab/HumanEval-MGT.

Abstract:
Spreadsheet applications are used by hundreds of millions worldwide, yet writing formulas remains a significant barrier. Existing approaches rely on static supervised data, which quickly saturates on limited annotations. In this paper, we introduce FormulaSPIN, a self-play framework that breaks the ceiling of supervised fine-tuning by enabling iterative self-improvement without any additional data. Vanilla SPIN fails on this task: it uniformly penalizes every non-matching output, so execution-equivalent alternatives are pushed down as negatives in one example while serving as ground truth in another, producing contradictory gradients. Our framework resolves this by exploiting formula generation’s unique advantage: binary executability provides implicit supervision that separates semantic errors from valid stylistic variants. We frame training as a two-player game in which the main player learns to prefer ground-truth formulas over those from its previous version, while execution feedback sorts outputs into distinct granularities—enabling an adaptive curriculum that shifts from semantic correctness to stylistic refinement. To further increase accuracy, we incorporate ExecVote, a semantic-level voting mechanism that naturally handles multiple valid formulations. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that FormulaSPIN achieves state-of-the-art performance, with 74.9% exact match and 87.1% execution accuracy on NL2FORMULA, matching models trained with additional preference annotations while outperforming both traditional SFT and frontier proprietary models. These findings underscore self-play’s potential to tackle scarce data tasks and open the door to extending it beyond executable domains.

Abstract:
Although large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit exceptional mathematical reasoning capabilities on clean inputs, their reasoning accuracy drops substantially in the presence of character-level noise such as typographical errors. Critically, their confidence estimates fail to reflect the corresponding decline in reasoning accuracy. While confidence calibration offers a principled solution, existing methods predominantly target clean inputs, leaving noisy scenarios largely unexplored. To address this gap, we propose DisCal (Distribution-aware Calibration), a confidence calibration framework for character-level noisy inputs. DisCal extracts uncertainty signals from both the empirical answer distribution and the model’s predictive distribution, and integrates them via a learned calibrator to produce well-calibrated confidence. Experiments across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DisCal consistently outperforms existing calibration methods under noisy inputs, reducing Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by up to 39.21% and improving Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) by up to 31.44%.

Abstract:
While model-based verifiers are essential for scaling Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), current outcome-centric verification paradigms primarily focus on the consistency between the final result and the ground truth, often neglecting potential errors in the derivation process. This leads to assigning positive rewards to correct answers produced from incorrect derivations. To bridge this gap, we introduce PRIME, a benchmark for evaluating verifiers on PRocess-outcome alignment verification In Mathematics and Engineering. Curated from a comprehensive collection of college-level STEM problems, PRIME comprises 2,530 high-difficulty samples through a consistency-based filtering pipeline. Through extensive evaluation, we find that current verifiers frequently fail to detect derivation flaws. Furthermore, we propose a process-aware RLVR training paradigm utilizing verifiers selected via PRIME. This approach substantially outperforms the outcome-only verification baseline, achieving absolute performance gains of 8.29%, 9.12%, and 7.31% on AIME24, AIME25, and Beyond-AIME, respectively, for the Qwen3-14B-Base model. Finally, we demonstrate a strong linear correlation ( R 2 > 0.92 ) between verifier accuracy on PRIME and RLVR training effectiveness, validating PRIME as a reliable predictor for verifier selection.

Abstract:
Evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is becoming increasingly expensive as benchmarks grow in scale and cross-modality complexity. Inspired by structuralism in cognitive psychology, we tackle this difficulty with an adaptive evaluation framework for efficient benchmarking, namely AutoJudger. Instead of passively scoring on a fixed test set, AutoJudger treats evaluation as an interview-like process by keeping a hypothesized ability structure of the evaluated model and actively selecting the informative questions so as to refine these ability boundaries. Specifically, AutoJudger has three core components: ability decomposition to organize evaluation along meaningful capability dimensions, ability estimation to maintain an up-to-date quantitative profile of the model competence, and adaptive question selection to choose the most informative questions. To operationalize this paradigm, we introduce A 2 -Judger, a novel MLLM-based Agentic instantiation of AutoJudger equipped with semantic-aware retrieval and dynamic memory. Experiments on four representative multimodal benchmarks show that A 2 -Judger significantly improves sample efficiency while maintaining reliable evaluation results.

Abstract:
Large language models increasingly require structured inference, from enforcing JSON schema to multilingual parsing, where outputs must satisfy complex constraints. We introduce MetaJuLS, a meta-reinforcement learning approach that learns universal constraint propagation policies applicable across languages and tasks without task-specific retraining. By formulating structured inference as adaptive constraint propagation and training a Graph Attention Network with meta-learning, MetaJuLS achieves 1.5-2.0× speedups over GPU-optimized baselines while maintaining an accuracy within 0.2% of that of state-of-the-art parsers. On Universal Dependencies across 10 languages and LLM-constrained generation (LogicBench, GSM8K-Constrained), MetaJuLS demonstrates rapid cross-domain adaptation: a policy trained on English parsing adapts to new languages and tasks with 5–10 gradient steps (5–15 seconds) rather than requiring hours of task-specific training. Mechanistic analysis reveals that the policy employs human-like parsing strategies (easy-first) and novel, non-intuitive heuristics. By reducing the number of propagation steps in LLM deployments, MetaJuLS contributes to Green AI by directly reducing the inference carbon footprint.

Abstract:
Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is standard in NLP, but benchmarks lack rigorous quality control. We present BenchMarker, an education-inspired toolkit using LLM judges to flag three common MCQ flaws: 1) contamination—items appearing exactly online; 2) shortcuts—cues in the choices that enable guessing; and 3) writing errors—structural/grammatical issues based on a 19-rule education rubric. We validate BenchMarker with human annotations, then run the tool to audit 12 benchmarks, revealing: 2) contaminated MCQs tend to inflate accuracy, while writing errors tend to lower it and change rankings beyond random; and 3) prior benchmark repairs address their targeted issues (i.e., lowering accuracy with LLM-written distractors), but inadvertently add new flaws (i.e. implausible distractors, many correct answers). Overall, flaws in MCQs degrade NLP evaluation, but education research offers a path forward. We release BenchMarker to bridge the fields and improve MCQA benchmark design.

Abstract:
Large transformer-based language models dominate modern NLP, yet our understanding of how they encode linguistic information relies primarily on studies of early models like BERT and GPT-2. We systematically probe 25 models from BERT Base to Qwen2.5-7B focusing on two linguistic properties: lexical identity and inflectional features across 6 diverse languages. We find a consistent pattern: inflectional features are linearly decodable throughout the model, while lexical identity is prominent early but increasingly weakens with depth. Further analysis of the representation geometry reveals that models with aggressive mid-layer dimensionality compression show reduced steering effectiveness in those layers, despite probe accuracy remaining high. Pretraining analysis shows that inflectional structure stabilizes early while lexical identity representations continue evolving. Taken together, our findings suggest that transformers maintain inflectional features across layers, while trading off lexical identity for compact, predictive representations.

Abstract:
Effective and efficient access to relevant information is essential for disaster management. However, no retrieval model is specialized for disaster management, and existing general-domain models fail to handle the varied search intents inherent to disaster management scenarios, resulting in inconsistent and unreliable performance. To this end, we introduce DMRetriever, the first series of dense retrieval models (33M to 7.6B) tailored for this domain. It is trained through a novel three-stage framework of bidirectional attention adaptation, unsupervised contrastive pre-training, and difficulty-aware progressive instruction fine-tuning, using high-quality data generated through an advanced data refinement pipeline. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that DMRetriever achieves state-of-the-art performance across all six search intents at every model scale. Moreover, DMRetriever is highly parameter-efficient, with 596M model outperforming baselines over 13.3 larger and 33M model exceeding baselines with only 7.6% of their parameters. All codes, data, and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/KaiYin97/DMRETRIEVER.

Abstract:
While Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) consistently outperform single-agent systems on complex tasks, their intricate interactions introduce critical reliability challenges arising from communication dynamics and role dependencies. Existing Uncertainty Quantification methods, typically designed for single-turn outputs, fail to address the unique complexities of the MAS. Specifically, these methods struggle with three distinct challenges: the cascading uncertainty in multi-step reasoning, the variability of inter-agent communication paths, and the diversity of communication topologies. To bridge this gap, we introduce MATU, a novel framework that quantifies uncertainty through tensor decomposition. MATU moves beyond analyzing final text outputs by representing entire reasoning trajectories as embedding matrices and organizing multiple execution runs into a higher-order tensor. By applying tensor decomposition, we disentangle and quantify distinct sources of uncertainty, offering a comprehensive reliability measure that is generalizable across different agent structures. We provide comprehensive experiments to show that MATU effectively estimates holistic and robust uncertainty across diverse tasks and communication topologies.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, where safety depends not only on how a system answers, but also on whether a query should be answered given a knowledge base (KB). Out-of-domain (OOD) queries can cause dense retrieval to surface weakly related context and lead the generator to produce fluent but unjustified responses. We study lightweight, KB-aligned OOD detection as an always-on gate for RAG systems. Our approach applies PCA to KB embeddings and scores queries in a compact subspace selected either by explained-variance retention (EVR) or by a separability-driven -test ranking. We evaluate geometric semantic-search rules and lightweight classifiers across 16 domains, including high-stakes COVID-19 and Substance Use KBs, and stress-test robustness using both LLM-generated attacks and an in-the-wild 4chan attack. We find that low-dimensional detectors achieve competitive OOD performance while being faster, cheaper, and more interpretable than prompted LLM-based judges. Finally, human and LLM-based evaluations show that OOD queries primarily degrade the relevance of RAG outputs, highlighting the need for efficient external OOD detection to maintain safe, in-scope behavior.

Abstract:
Trustworthy biomedical question answering (QA) systems must not only provide accurate answers but also justify them with current, verifiable evidence. Retrieval-augmented approaches partially address this gap but lack mechanisms to iteratively refine poor queries, whereas self-reflection methods kick in only after full retrieval is completed. In this context, we introduce PubMed Reasoner, a biomedical QA agent composed of three stages: self-critic query refinement evaluates MeSH terms for coverage, alignment, and redundancy to enhance PubMed queries based on partial (metadata) retrieval; reflective retrieval processes articles in batches until sufficient evidence is gathered; and evidence-grounded response generation produces answers with explicit citations. PubMed Reasoner with a GPT-4o backbone achieves 78.32% accuracy on PubMedQA, slightly surpassing human experts, and showing consistent gains on MMLU Clinical Knowledge. Moreover, LLM-as-judge evaluations prefer our responses across: reasoning soundness, evidence grounding, clinical relevance, and trustworthiness. By orchestrating retrieval-first reasoning over authoritative sources, our approach provides practical assistance to clinicians and biomedical researchers while controlling compute and token costs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in culturally sensitive real-world tasks. However, existing cultural alignment approaches fail to align LLMs’ broad cultural values with the specific goals of downstream tasks and suffer from cross-culture interference. We propose CultureManager, a novel pipeline for task-specific cultural alignment. CultureManager synthesizes task-aware cultural data in line with target task formats, grounded in culturally relevant web search results. To prevent conflicts between cultural norms, it manages multi-culture knowledge learned in separate adapters with a culture router that selects the appropriate one to apply. Experiments across five national cultures and ten culture-sensitive tasks show consistent improvements over prompt-based and fine-tuning baselines. Our results demonstrate the necessity of task adaptation and modular culture management for effective cultural alignment.

Abstract:
Despite significant advances in large language models (LLMs), their knowledge memorization capabilities remain underexplored, due to the lack of standardized and high-quality testing grounds. In this paper, we introduce a novel, real-world and large-scale knowledge injection benchmark that continuously evolves without human intervention. Specifically, we propose WikiDYK, which leverages recently-added and expert-curated facts from Wikipedia’s “Did You Know...” entries. Each entry is converted into multiple question–answer pairs spanning diverse task formats from easy cloze prompts to complex multi-hop questions. WikiDYK currently contains 12,290 facts and 77,180 questions, and its design allows for seamless extension with future updates from Wikipedia editors. Through extensive experiments using continued pre-training, we reveal a surprising insight: despite their prevalence in modern LLMs, Causal Language Models (CLMs) demonstrate significantly weaker knowledge memorization capabilities compared to Bidirectional Language Models (BiLMs), exhibiting a 23% lower accuracy in terms of reliability. To compensate for the smaller scales of current BiLMs, we introduce a modular collaborative framework utilizing ensembles of BiLMs as external knowledge repositories to integrate with LLMs. Experiment shows that this framework further improves the reliability accuracy by up to 29.1%. Code: https://github.com/zhang-yu-wei/WikiDYK .

Abstract:
Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the “one-to-many” nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality through the lens of information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage of salient visual information while ensuring strict factuality. We introduce CapQuiz, a novel reference-free benchmark that assesses captions based on their utility in answering human-verified, fine-grained, multiple-choice questions derived from the video. CapQuiz features a hierarchical taxonomy of 10 question types (spanning Descriptive and Inferential categories) across 24 diverse video domains. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CapQuiz correlates significantly better with human judgments than existing metrics and offers interpretable insights into model performance. We will release the benchmark to facilitate reproducible research.

Abstract:
The post-training stage of Large Language Models (LLMs) typically involves Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by preference alignment to ensure LLM to generate safe, helpful, and instruction-aligned content. The SFT model critically serves as both the initialization and reference model for subsequent preference alignment. However, an essential yet often neglected question is the optimal selection of the SFT checkpoint for this role. We show that checkpoint selection substantially affects final performance, and that the common practice of choosing the minimum validation-loss checkpoint often fails, due to a fundamental conflict between SFT’s focus on imitation and alignment’s goal of response discriminability. To this end, we propose RewardRank, a simple, effective, training-free metrics for estimating initial implicit alignment between reference model and preference objective. Empirical evidence suggests that, using our selected model as reference can gain up to 67.6% relative increase on length-controlled win rate on the popular Zephyr recipe comparing to baselines.

Abstract:
A goal of interpretability is to recover disentangled representations of latent concepts (features) from the activations of neural networks. The quality of features is typically evaluated in isolation, and under implicit independence assumptions that may not hold in practice. Thus, it is unclear to what extent common featurization methods such as sparse autoencoders (SAEs) and probes disentangle one concept from another. We propose a multi-concept evaluation setting using concepts such as sentiment, domain, voice, and tense. We evaluate how well featurizers produce disentangled representations of each concept, observing that features are typically sensitive to only one concept, but also that concepts are distributed across many features. Then, we steer these features, measuring whether each concept is independently manipulable, and whether features interact. Even in idealized settings, steering a feature often affects many concepts, despite a near absence of interaction effects. These results suggest that correlational metrics are insufficient to establish steering selectivity, and that demonstrating that two features operate in separate spaces is insufficient to claim that they will be selective for one concept. These results underscore the importance of multi-concept evaluations in interpretability research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate synthetic datasets for the evaluation and training of downstream models. However, prior work has noted that such generated data lacks diversity. In this paper, we propose VOYAGER, a novel principled approach to generate diverse datasets. Our approach is iterative and directly optimizes a mathematical quantity that optimizes the diversity of the dataset using the machinery of determinantal point processes. Furthermore, our approach is training-free, applicable to closed-source models, and scalable. In addition to providing theoretical justification for the working of our method, we also demonstrate through comprehensive experiments that VOYAGER improves diversity by 1.5 - 𝟑 times compared to popular baseline approaches.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at code-related tasks but often struggle in realistic software repositories, where project-specific APIs and cross-file dependencies are crucial. Retrieval-augmented methods mitigate this by injecting repository context at inference time. Low inference time latency budget either affects retrieval quality or the added latency impacts user experience adversely. We address this limitation with SpecAgent, an agent that enhances both latency and code-generation quality by proactively exploring repository files during indexing and constructing speculative context that anticipates future edits in each file. This indexing-time asynchrony allows thorough context computation masking latency and the speculative nature of the context improves code-generation quality. Additionally, we identify the problem of future context leakage in existing benchmarks, which can inflate reported performance. To address this, we construct a synthetic, leakage-free benchmark that enables a more realistic evaluation of our agent against baselines. Experiments show that SpecAgent consistently achieves absolute gains of 9–11% (48–58% relative) compared to the best-performing baselines, while significantly reducing inference latency.

Abstract:
Assessing the quality of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs becomes especially challenging in high-branching settings, where a single prompt yields many plausible candidates. Existing verifiers typically operate on the surface text (e.g., reward models, LLM judges, majority voting) or on confidence proxies derived from token probabilities, both of which can be brittle: the former can be influenced by stylistic artifacts, while the latter is often miscalibrated. In this paper, we study a third source of information—the model’s hidden states—for binary correctness verification in tasks with a reliable success/failure signal (e.g., deterministic checkers or reference-grounded answers). We find that correct and incorrect solutions exhibit measurable geometric differences in their hidden-state trajectories. To isolate this signal with minimal modeling assumptions, we introduce Clue (Clustering and Experience-based Verification) , a training-free, non-parametric verifier. Clue summarizes each reasoning trace by an activation delta —the difference between hidden states at the start and end of the explicit reasoning span—and predicts correctness by comparing this delta to two class centroids computed from labeled experience. Across math (AIME 24/25), scientific QA (GPQA), and a multi-domain benchmark (WebInstruct-verified), Clue improves selection and reranking, with particularly strong gains on smaller or less-calibrated models. For example, on AIME 24 with a 1.5B model, Clue raises accuracy from 56.7% (majority@64) to 70.0% (top-maj@16).

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large reasoning models has saturated existing math benchmarks, underscoring the urgent need for more challenging evaluation frameworks. To address this, we introduce OlymMATH, a rigorously curated, Olympiad-level math benchmark comprising 350 problems, each with parallel English and Chinese versions. OlymMATH is the first benchmark to unify dual evaluation paradigms within a single suite: (1) natural language evaluation through OlymMATH-EASY and OlymMATH-HARD, comprising 200 computational problems with numerical answers for objective rule-based assessment, and (2) formal verification through OlymMATH-LEAN, offering 150 problems formalized in Lean 4 for rigorous process-level evaluation. All problems are manually sourced from printed publications to minimize data contamination, verified by experts, and span four core domains. Extensive experiments reveal the benchmark’s significant challenge, and our analysis also uncovers consistent performance gaps between languages and identifies cases where models employ heuristic "guessing" rather than rigorous reasoning. To further support community research, we release 582k+ reasoning trajectories, a visualization tool, and expert solutions at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/OlymMATH.

Abstract:
While large language models have revolutionized Text-to-SQL tasks, translating natural language into Graph Query Languages (Text2GQL) remains underexplored due to the topological heterogeneity and syntactic diversity of graph query languages (e.g., Cypher, Gremlin, SPARQL). Existing approaches often struggle with structural hallucinations and lack adaptability in cold-start scenarios. In this paper, we present a unified, training-free Text2GQL framework. First, Structural Twig Linking elevates schema grounding to the identification of semantic substructures (“twigs”), providing robust topological priors. Second, addressing data scarcity, Evolutionary In-Context Learning operates in a Tabula Rasa setting to implicitly construct a self-growing repository of verified examples driven by syntactic utility. Finally, our Adversarial Execution-Guided Correction agent enforces fidelity through synergistic static critique and dynamic verification. Experiments demonstrate significant improvements over baselines in both accuracy and executability across diverse GQLs. The code is available at https://github.com/nf202/Text2Graph.

Abstract:
Computer-aided design (CAD) is crucial in prototyping complex 3D objects through precise geometric modeling. In practical design workflows, designers manually define assembly sequences for individual CAD parts, a process that is both time-consuming and expertise-intensive. To address this challenge, we formulate CAD assembly as a parametric action prediction task: given a reference design image and disassembled parts, the model predicts 6-DoF transformations (, actions) to progressively assemble each part. This paradigm enables multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to solve the task through autoregressive action generation. While recent MLLMs demonstrate promising spatial reasoning, they struggle with fine-grained geometric structure understanding and physical collision avoidance during assembly. In this paper, we propose CADMate, an MLLM-based framework for sequential CAD assembly action generation. Our training strategy comprises three stages: (i) CAD domain adaptation for spatial geometry and position understanding, (ii) supervised fine-tuning with geometric chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning for action generation, and (iii) reinforcement learning with spatial-physical rewards jointly optimize spatial accuracy and collision avoidance. Additionally, we also construct CADBuilder dataset, comprising over 45 K CAD assemblies with annotated action sequences. Our experiments demonstrate that CADMate significantly outperforms existing prominent MLLMs (, GPT-5), showing great potential in design applications.

Abstract:
When large language models are used in real-world scenarios, continual learning (CL) becomes a non-trivial problem. In particular, continual learning with modern LLMs is challenged both by the substantial computational costs induced by their massive parameter scale, and by the limitations of current CL methods, which are mainly designed to mitigate catastrophic forgetting while neglecting knowledge sharing across tasks. We further observe that models with stronger performance exhibit stronger inter-task connections. In light of the above challenges and findings, we propose Attribution Scores-based Soft Orthogonality Low-Rank Adaptation (ASO-LoRA), an effective and efficient framework that simultaneously facilitates knowledge transfer while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Specifically, ASO-LoRA initially assigns task-specific parameter subspaces for new tasks utilizing multi-LoRA modules, enabling for efficient training and inference without relying on task labels. Then, ASO-LoRA leverages attribution scores to evaluate task similarity and employs soft orthogonality between task-specific subspaces, guiding gradient updates in directions that promote parameter isolation, achieving a balance between knowledge transfer and preservation. Experiments are carried out on both the T5-large and the LLaMA2-7B, showing ASO-LoRA’s superior performance and suitability as a plug-in CL solution for general Transformer-based LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/736619821/ASO-LORA.

Abstract:
Controllable summarization moves beyond generic outputs toward human-aligned summaries guided by specified attributes. In practice, the interdependence among attributes makes it challenging for language models to satisfy correlated constraints consistently. Moreover, previous approaches often require per-attribute fine-tuning, limiting flexibility across diverse summary attributes. In this paper, we propose adaptive planning for multi-attribute controllable summarization (PACO), a training-free framework that reframes the task as planning the order of sequential attribute control with a customized Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). In PACO, nodes represent summaries, and actions correspond to single-attribute adjustments, enabling progressive refinement of only the attributes requiring further control. This strategy adaptively discovers optimal control orders, ultimately producing summaries that effectively meet all constraints. Extensive experiments across diverse domains and models demonstrate that PACO achieves robust multi-attribute controllability, surpassing both LLM-based self-planning models and fine-tuned baselines. Remarkably, PACO with Llama-3.2-1B rivals the controllability of the much larger Llama-3.3-70B baselines. With larger models, PACO achieves superior control performance, outperforming all competitors.

Abstract:
Simulating student writing behavior offers a promising pathway to scalable feedback evaluation and teacher training. However, existing LLM-based approaches tend to model overly capable learners who readily understand and over-apply feedback, resulting in pedagogically implausible behavior. In this work, we introduce pedagogical realism as a guiding principle for student writing simulation, emphasizing bounded cognition, selective feedback comprehension, and developmentally plausible learning processes. To operationalize this idea, we propose CPT-Agent, a cognitively grounded framework that decouples cognitive ability from writing proficiency and models their interaction during writing and revision. CPT-Agent combines probabilistic modeling of cognitive development, proficiency-controlled text generation, and structured memory for skill accumulation. Experiments show that it (1) produces clearly distinguishable proficiency levels, (2) generates cognitively plausible revisions consistent with instructional theories, and (3) achieves strong agreement with expert judgments in evaluating feedback quality. These results highlight the importance of modeling cognitive constraints in LLM-based student simulation and demonstrate the potential of pedagogically realistic agents for automated feedback assessment and teacher development.

Abstract:
Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) garnered growing research interest in multilingual contexts in the past. However, the majority of the studies lack more robust feature alignment and finer aspect-level alignment. In this paper, we propose a novel framework, MSMO: Multi-Scale and Multi-Objective optimization for cross-lingual ABSA. During multi-scale alignment, we achieve cross-lingual sentence-level and aspect-level alignment, aligning features of aspect terms in different contextual environments. Specifically, we introduce code-switched bilingual sentences into the language discriminator and consistency training modules to enhance the model’s robustness. During multi-objective optimization, we design two optimization objectives: supervised training and consistency training, aiming to enhance cross-lingual semantic alignment. To further improve model performance, we incorporate distilled knowledge of the target language into the model. Results show that MSMO significantly enhances cross-lingual ABSA by achieving state-of-the-art performance across multiple languages and models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) excel at function calling, but inference scaling has been explored mainly for unstructured generation. We propose an inference-scaling framework for structured outputs that combines fine-grained beam search with ToolPRM, a process reward model scoring each intra-call decision (function name and argument filling). We build the first fine-grained intra-call supervision dataset via function masking, rollout collection, and step-level annotation. ToolPRM outperforms outcome and coarse-grained reward models in predictive accuracy and yields consistent test-time gains on multiple function-calling benchmarks. We further show that structured generation follows “explore more but retain less”, since early JSON errors are unrecoverable.

Abstract:
Expanding the linguistic diversity of instruct large language models (LLMs) is crucial for global accessibility but is often hindered by the reliance on costly specialized target language labeled data and catastrophic forgetting during adaptation. We tackle this challenge under a realistic, low-resource constraint: adapting instruct LLMs using only unlabeled target language data. We introduce Source-Shielded Updates (SSU), a selective parameter update strategy that proactively preserves source knowledge. Using a small set of source data and a parameter importance scoring method, SSU identifies parameters critical to maintaining source abilities. It then applies a column-wise freezing strategy to protect these parameters before adaptation. Experiments across five typologically diverse languages and 7B and 13B models demonstrate that SSU successfully mitigates catastrophic forgetting. It reduces performance degradation on monolingual source tasks to just 3.4% (7B) and 2.8% (13B) on average, a stark contrast to the 20.3% and 22.3% from full fine-tuning. SSU also achieves target-language performance highly competitive with full fine-tuning, outperforming it on all benchmarks for 7B models and the majority for 13B models.

Abstract:
Effective code generation requires both model capability and a problem representation that carefully structures how models reason and plan. Existing approaches augment reasoning steps or inject specific structure into how models think, but leave scattered problem conditions unchanged. Inspired by the way humans organize fragmented information into coherent explanations, we propose StoryCoder, a narrative reformulation framework that transforms code generation questions into coherent natural language narratives, providing richer contextual structure than simple rephrasings. Each narrative consists of three components: a task overview, constraints, and example test cases, guided by the selected algorithm and genre. Experiments across 11 models on HumanEval, LiveCodeBench, and CodeForces demonstrate consistent improvements, with an average gain of 18.7% in zero-shot pass@10. Beyond accuracy, our analyses reveal that narrative reformulation guides models toward correct algorithmic strategies, reduces implementation errors, and induces a more modular code structure. The analyses further show that these benefits depend on narrative coherence and genre alignment, suggesting that structured problem representation is important for code generation regardless of model scale or architecture. Our code is available at https://github.com/gu-ni/StoryCoder.

Abstract:
Although the effectiveness of Large Language Models as judges has been validated, their performance remains limited in open-ended tasks, particularly in story evaluation. Accurate story evaluation is crucial not only for assisting human quality judgment but also for providing reward signals to guide story generation. However, existing methods face a dilemma: prompt engineering for closed-source models suffers from poor adaptability, while fine-tuning approaches for open-source models lack the reasoning capabilities essential for story evaluation. To address this, we propose the Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning (EvolvR) framework. Grounded in pairwise comparison, the framework first self-synthesizes score-aligned Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data via a multi-persona strategy. To ensure data quality, these raw CoTs undergo a self-filtering process, utilizing multi-agents to guarantee their logical rigor and robustness. Finally, the evaluator trained on the refined data is deployed as a reward model to guide the story generation task. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on three evaluation benchmarks including StoryER, HANNA and OpenMEVA. Furthermore, when served as a reward model, it enhances the quality of generated stories, thereby validating the superiority of our self-evolving approach.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks by generating intermediate reasoning before the final answer, yet they remain prone to reasoning hallucinations such as subtle arithmetic or constraint-violation errors. Prior hallucination detectors often rely on external verification or local token-level signals, which are limited for LRMs and largely overlook whether the cross-phase information flow from reasoning to answering is structurally robust. We propose Routing Focus Score (RFS), a step-level indicator that measures how strongly cross-step attention routing aligns with semantic proximity derived from hidden-state cosine similarity. We further design RFS-Guard, a lightweight hallucination detection framework based on RFS. Empirically, we observe that higher reasoning–answer RFS is consistently associated with higher hallucination risk, suggesting a routing-collapse failure mode where models might prefer self-confirmation loops and suppress the ability to audit their own generations. Experimental results across multiple domains and models demonstrate the superiority of RFS-Guard for detecting and localizing hallucinations in LRMs without requiring external tools or repeated sampling.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced the fluency of Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) systems, current research predominantly focuses on engineering increasingly complex architectures—from intricate reasoning chains to multi-agent collaborations. While these advancements (e.g., CoT) offer semantic traces of reasoning, they remain mechanistically opaque, obscuring the fundamental causal mechanisms between dialogue features and effective empathic strategies, leading to poor interpretability and susceptibility to distribution shifts in offline learning. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework Causal-ESC . Departing from conventional paradigms that directly utilize raw dialogue history as input, our approach introduces Doubly Robust (DR) learning to explicitly model the causal effect of utterance features on strategy selection, effectively mitigating the biases and counterfactual unobservability inherent in offline datasets. We further integrate an LLM-based stylized rewriting mechanism to translate these rigorously learned causal strategies into natural, context-consistent responses. Comprehensive experiments, supported by statistical verification (e.g., Outcome R 2 ) and human-like evaluation, demonstrate that our framework not only significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in empathy and helpfulness but also provides a theoretically grounded, interpretable solution to the mechanistic interpretability dilemma in affective computing.

Abstract:
Transfer learning has demonstrated efficacy in single-property constraint molecular generation. However, real-world drug discovery demands molecules to satisfy multiple property constraints. Existing paradigms often struggle with this challenge due to catastrophic forgetting or gradient conflicts. To address this, we propose a conflict-aware molecular language model merging framework (CAML). CAML generates multiple constraints molecular as a cooperative game among property-specific fine-tune models (expert models). Specifically, we formulate a Stability-Aware Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (SACMA-ES) to dynamically optimize the fusion strategy. This algorithm searches for a Nash-equilibrium–like solution that minimizes conflicts among properties by exploring the optimal combination of the importance of the task parameter (intrinsic scale) and relative fusion weights of each expert (fusion coefficient), yielding a multi-constraint molecular property generation model without revisiting the training data. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAML achieves state-of-the-art performance in complex multi-constraint scenarios. Our results validate that this training-free paradigm offers a robust and efficient solution for resolving intrinsic property conflicts in de novo molecular design.

Abstract:
Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) extrapolation aims to predict future events based on historical facts. Recent studies have attempted to enhance TKG extrapolation by integrating TKG’s evolving structural representations and textual event chains into Large Language Models (LLMs). Yet, two main challenges limit these approaches: (1) The loss of essential spatial-temporal information due to shallow alignment between TKG’s graph evolving structural representation and the LLM’s semantic space, and (2) the progressive dilution of the TKG’s evolving structural features during LLM fine-tuning. To address these challenges, we propose the Spatial-Temporal Knowledge Adapter (STK-Adapter), which flexibly integrates the evolving graph encoder and the LLM to facilitate TKG reasoning. In STK-Adapter, a Spatial-Temporal MoE is designed to capture spatial structures and temporal patterns inherent in TKGs. An Event-Aware MoE is employed to model intricate temporal semantics dependencies within event chains. In addition, a Cross-Modality Alignment MoE is proposed to facilitate deep cross-modality alignment by TKG-guided attention experts. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that STK-Adapter significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods and exhibits strong generalization capabilities in cross-dataset task. The code is available at https://github.com/Zhaoshuyuan0246/STK-Adapter.

Abstract:
Vision-language reward modeling faces a dilemma: generative approaches are interpretable but slow, while discriminative ones are efficient but act as opaque "black boxes." To bridge this gap, we propose VL-MDR (Vision-Language Multi-Dimensional Reward), a framework that dynamically decomposes evaluation into granular, interpretable dimensions. Instead of outputting a monolithic scalar, VL-MDR employs a visual-aware gating mechanism to identify relevant dimensions and adaptively weight them (e.g., Hallucination, Reasoning) for each specific input. To support this, we curate a dataset of 321k vision-language preference pairs annotated across 21 fine-grained dimensions. Extensive experiments show that VL-MDR consistently outperforms existing open-source reward models on benchmarks like VL-RewardBench. Furthermore, we show that VL-MDR-constructed preference pairs effectively enable DPO alignment to mitigate visual hallucinations and improve reliability, providing a scalable solution for VLM alignment.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced their reasoning capabilities. However, they continue to struggle with basic character-level tasks, such as counting letters in words—a problem rooted in their tokenization process. While existing benchmarks have highlighted this weakness through basic character operations, such failures are often dismissed due to lacking practical relevance. Yet, many real-world applications, such as navigating text-based maps or interpreting structured tables, rely heavily on precise sub-token understanding. In this regard, we introduce SubTokenTest, a comprehensive benchmark that assesses sub-token understanding through practical, utility-driven tasks. Our benchmark includes ten tasks across four domains and isolates tokenization-related failures by decoupling performance from complex reasoning. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of nine advanced LLMs. Additionally, we investigate the impact of test-time scaling on sub-token reasoning and explore how character-level information is encoded within the hidden states.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in tackling complex tasks through step-by-step thinking. However, this lengthy reasoning process incurs substantial computational and latency overheads, hindering the practical deployment of LRMs. This work presents a new approach to mitigating overthinking in LRMs via black-box persuasive prompting. By treating LRMs as black-box communicators, we investigate how to persuade them to generate concise responses without compromising accuracy. We introduce Whisper, an iterative refinement framework that generates high-quality persuasive prompts from diverse perspectives. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Whisper consistently reduces token usage while preserving performance. Notably, Whisper achieves a 3× reduction in average response length on simple GSM8K questions for the Qwen3 series and delivers an average ∼ 40% token reduction overall. For closed-source APIs, Whisper reduces token usage on MATH-500 by 46% for Claude-3.7 and 50% for Gemini-2.5. Further analysis reveals the broad applicability of Whisper across data domains, model scales, and families, underscoring the potential of black-box persuasive prompting as a practical strategy for enhancing LRM efficiency.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on natural language to SQL (NL2SQL) benchmarks, yet their reported accuracy may be inflated by contamination from benchmark queries or structurally similar patterns seen during training. We introduce SPENCE (Syntactic Probing and Evaluation of NL2SQL Contamination Effects), a controlled syntactic probing framework for detecting and quantifying such contamination. SPENCE systematically generates syntactic variants of test queries for four widely used NL2SQL datasets—Spider, SParC, CoSQL, and the newer BIRD benchmark. We use SPENCE to evaluate multiple high-capacity LLMs under execution-based scoring. For each model, we measure changes in execution accuracy (Delta Accuracy) across increasing levels of syntactic divergence and quantify rank sensitivity using Kendall’s tau with bootstrap confidence intervals. By aligning these robustness trends with benchmark release dates, we observe a clear temporal gradient: older benchmarks such as Spider exhibit the strongest negative values and thus the highest likelihood of training leakage, whereas the more recent BIRD dataset shows minimal sensitivity and appears largely uncontaminated. Together, these findings highlight the importance of temporally contextualized, syntactic-probing evaluation for trustworthy NL2SQL benchmarking.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling has enabled Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex reasoning, yet the limitations of current Chain-of-Thought (CoT) evaluation obscure whether performance gains stem from genuine reasoning or mere verbosity. To address this, (1) we propose a novel neuro-symbolic framework for the non-intrusive, comprehensive process-centric evaluation of reasoning grounded in First-Order Logic. (2) Through this lens, we identify four distinct behavioral prototypes and diagnose the failure modes. (3) We examine the impact of inference mode, training strategy, and model scale. Our analysis reveals that extended token generation is not a prerequisite for deep reasoning. Furthermore, we reveal critical constraints: mixing long and short CoT data in training risks premature saturation and collapse, while distillation into smaller models captures behavioral length but fails to replicate logical efficacy due to intrinsic capacity limits.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success on reasoning-intensive tasks such as mathematics and programming. However, their enhanced reasoning capabilities do not necessarily translate to improved safety performance—and in some cases, may even degrade it. This raises an important research question: how should we enhance the safety of LRMs? In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study on how to enhance the safety of LRMs through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Our investigation begins with an unexpected observation: directly distilling safe responses from DeepSeek-R1 fails to significantly enhance safety. We analyze this phenomenon and identify five key risky patterns that contribute to it. We then demonstrate that explicitly addressing these issues during the data distillation process can lead to substantial safety improvements. Next, we explore whether a long and complex reasoning process is necessary for achieving safety. Interestingly, we find that simply using short or template-based reasoning process can attain comparable safety performance. These findings prompt a deeper reflection on the role of reasoning in ensuring safety. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive ablation study to reveal the impact of different training configurations. Overall, we hope our empirical study could provide a more holistic picture on enhancing the safety of LRMs.

Abstract:
Small language models (SLMs) enable scalable tool-augmented multi-agent systems where multiple SLMs handle subtasks orchestrated by a powerful coordinator. However, they struggle with tool-use tasks, particularly in selecting appropriate tools and identifying correct parameters. A common failure mode is schema misalignment : models hallucinate plausible tool names that are absent from the provided tool schema, due to different naming conventions internalized during pretraining. Rather than training models to adapt to unfamiliar schemas, we propose adapting schemas to align with models’ pretrained knowledge. We introduce PA-Tool (Pretraining-Aligned Tool Schema Generation), a training-free method that leverages peakedness, a signal used in contamination detection that indicates pretraining familiarity, to rename tool components. By generating multiple candidates and selecting the candidate with the highest peakedness, PA-Tool identifies pretraining-aligned naming patterns. Experiments on MetaTool and RoTBench show improvements of up to 17%, with schema misalignment errors reduced by 80%. PA-Tool enables small models to substantially improve tool-use accuracy without retraining, showing that schema-level interventions can unlock the tool-use potential of resource-efficient models. Our code is available at https://github.com/holi-lab/PA-Tool .

Abstract:
High-Level Synthesis (HLS) improves IC development productivity by enabling hardware design from C-like languages. However, strict coding constraints and design-specific optimizations limit its widespread adoption. While recent efforts employ large language models (LLMs) to assist HLS design, they often struggle with synthesizability rules and directive semantics. To this end, we introduce ChatHLS, a multi-agent HLS design framework that leverages specialized LLMs for automated debugging and directive tuning. ChatHLS incorporates an adaptive error case expansion mechanism, combined with a reasoning-to-instruction analysis method to accurately diagnose HLS errors. To optimize hardware performance, it enables QoR-aware reasoning to learn the impact of HLS directives on the quality of results (QoR). Experimental results demonstrate that ChatHLS outperforms Gemini-3-pro with a 32.6% relative improvement in debugging, while achieving significant speedups across various HLS kernels and neural network accelerators. These results underscore the potential of ChatHLS for agile hardware development.

Abstract:
Augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools enables them to execute complex, multi-step tasks. However, tool learning is hampered by the static synthetic data pipelines, where data generation and model training are executed as two separate, non-interactive processes. This approach fails to focus on the model’s specific weaknesses adaptively and allows noisy labels to persist, degrading training efficiency. We introduce LoopTool , a fully automated, model-aware data evolution framework that closes this loop by tightly integrating data synthesis and model training. LoopTool iteratively evolves both the data and the model through three synergistic modules: (1) Greedy Capability Probing (GCP) diagnoses the model’s mastered and failed capabilities; (2) Judgement-Guided Label Verification (JGLV) uses an open-source judge model to find and correct annotation errors, progressively purifying the dataset; and (3) Error-Driven Data Expansion (EDDE) generates new, challenging samples based on identified failures. This closed-loop process is tightly integrated with reinforcement learning training and operates within a cost-efficient, open-source ecosystem, thereby eliminating reliance on costly APIs. Experiments show that LoopTool-8B significantly surpasses its 32B data generator and achieves new state-of-the-art results on the BFCL-v3 and ACEBench benchmarks for its scale. Our work demonstrates that closed-loop, self-refining data pipelines can dramatically enhance the tool-use capabilities of LLMs.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning has become a powerful approach for enhancing large language model reasoning, but faces a fundamental dilemma: training on easy problems can cause overfitting and pass@k degradation, while training on hard problems often results in sparse rewards. Recent question augmentation methods address this by prepending partial solutions as hints. However, uniform hint provision may introduce redundant information while missing critical reasoning bottlenecks, and excessive hints can reduce reasoning diversity, causing pass@k degradation. We propose PieceHint , a hint injection framework that strategically identifies and provides critical reasoning steps during training. By scoring the importance of different reasoning steps, selectively allocating hints based on problem difficulty, and progressively withdrawing scaffolding, PieceHint enables models to transition from guided learning to independent reasoning. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that our 1.5B model achieves comparable average performance to 32B baselines while preserving pass@k diversity across all k values.

Abstract:
Legal relations serve as an important analytical framework for dispute resolution in civil cases. However, legal relations in Chinese civil cases remain underexplored in the field of legal AI, largely due to the absence of comprehensive schemas. In this work, we first introduce a comprehensive schema for legal relations in civil cases, which contains a hierarchical taxonomy and definitions of arguments. Based on this schema, we formulate a legal relation extraction task and present LexRel, an expert-annotated benchmark for legal relation extraction in the Chinese civil law domain. We use LexRel to evaluate state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on legal relation extraction, showing that current LLMs exhibit significant limitations in accurately identifying civil legal relations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that explicitly incorporating information about legal relations leads to promising performance gains on other downstream legal AI tasks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models continue to scale in size and capability, driving substantial computational and memory demands.Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures alleviate this cost by activating only a sparse subset of experts per token, enabling efficient scaling without proportional increases in inference compute.However, quantization in MoE models remains challenging due to heterogeneous sensitivity across experts and their internal linear layers.Existing mixed-precision frameworks such as Mixed-precision Quantization for MoE (MxMoE) require full quantization-loss evaluation for expert–layer–and-bit configurations, incurring prohibitive profiling cost.To address this, we propose FRI-MxMoE, a profiling-free mixed-precision quantization framework built on Fuzzy Rule Interpolation, designed as a drop-in replacement for the loss estimation component in MxMoE. By constructing a fuzzy rule base in the intra-expert layer feature space (bit-width, activation variance, parameter scale), our method predicts quantization error from only sparse samples, eliminating the need for dense profiling.Extensive experiments demonstrate that FRI-MxMoE accelerates the profiling phase by up to 15.7× (on DeepSeek-V2) while achieving comparable or slightly superior zero-shot accuracy (e.g., +1.04% on DeepSeekV2-Lite) compared to the baseline.This enables continuous sensitivity modeling, preserves accuracy under mixed-precision allocation, and reduces offline computation by orders of magnitude.

Abstract:
Deep Research systems based on web agents have shown strong potential in solving complex information-seeking tasks, yet their search efficiency remains underexplored. We observe that many state-of-the-art open-source web agents rely on long tool-call trajectories with cyclic reasoning loops and exploration of unproductive branches. To address this, we propose WebClipper, a framework that compresses web agent trajectories via graph-based pruning. Concretely, we model the agent’s search process as a state graph and cast trajectory optimization as a minimum-necessary Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) mining problem, yielding pruned trajectories that preserve essential reasoning while eliminating redundant steps. Continued training on these refined trajectories enables the agent to evolve toward more efficient search patterns and reduces tool-call rounds by about 20% while improving accuracy. Furthermore, we introduce a new metric called F-AE Score to measure the model’s overall performance in balancing accuracy and efficiency. Experiments demonstrate that WebClipper compresses tool-call rounds under excellent performance, providing practical insight into balancing effectiveness and efficiency in web agent design.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate overconfident yet factually incorrect hallucinations. Current detection paradigms suffer from a trade-off between the high accuracy of computationally expensive black-box methods and the inability of white-box methods to detect stubborn hallucinations. To bridge this gap, we propose GHOST (Geometric Hidden-state Observation for Semantic Truthfulness), an efficient white-box framework for hallucination detection in LLMs. We primarily target confused hallucinations marked by internal reasoning instability, while also capturing stubborn hallucinations characterized by premature layer-wise convergence as a complementary signal. By integrating internal geometric dynamics with output probability distributions, GHOST constructs a high-dimensional feature space for non-linear truthfulness classification. Extensive evaluations on FinanceBench, RAGTruth, HaluEval, and PopQA show that GHOST outperforms white-box baselines and achieves competitive black-box performance while reducing computational overhead by over 90%, offering a robust solution for real-time detection.

Abstract:
Low-resource languages challenge multilingual LLMs due to limited high-quality training data, leading to weaker performance on complex reasoning and knowledge tasks. To address this, we propose improving training data quality through data synthesis, moving beyond simple resource scaling. First, we introduce SynTrans, which translates high-quality, knowledge-rich English data into low-resource languages during pre-training to inject world knowledge, though at the cost of semantic fluency. To overcome low-quality data issues while maintaining fluency, we also propose SynRank. SynRank leverages synthetic data as positive samples to train a classifier that ranks and filters noisy real-world data, enabling the extraction of high-quality subsets without expensive human cleaning. Experiments show SynRank matches handcrafted rule-based filtering by human experts and significantly improves knowledge-intensive task performance at the same filtering rate. Remarkably, higher filtering rates even improve performance with less data, demonstrating the efficiency and effectiveness of our method, surpassing expert filtering. Lastly, we introduce DA-QwenScore, a training-free metric that evaluates corpus quality by normalizing model loss with diversity measures, further enhancing evaluation efficiency. Our insights into knowledge injection could advance low-resource multilingual LLM development.

Abstract:
Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) reasoning remains challenging to characterize with conventional flat representations due to its intrinsic heterogeneous structure. Existing multi-geometry approaches face two key bottlenecks: 1) the Riemannian depth barrier driven by numerical instability, which restricts models to shallow architectures; and 2) gate collapse, where adaptive fusion mechanisms suffer from gradient starvation and degenerate into single-geometry solutions. To this end, we propose MAGIC (Multi-geometry Annealing Graph Interaction with Consensus). Our framework introduces a Tangent-Residual Engine in multi-geometric spaces, which enables the first stable 8-layer geometric evolution and reveals a phenomenon termed Geometric Annealing, where manifold curvature spontaneously evolves from semantic flatness in shallow layers to structural complexity in deeper layers. We further design an explicit reasoning module with structural consensus, leveraging geometric invariants and structural priors to regulate gradient flow, prevent collapse, and ensure robust synergy across Hyperbolic, Spherical, and Euclidean spaces. Experiments show that MAGIC achieves state-of-the-art performance in TKG reasoning, improving MRR by up to 2.9 points.

Abstract:
Training LLMs at ultra-low precision remains a formidable challenge. Direct low-bit QAT often suffers from convergence instability and substantial training costs, exacerbated by quantization noise from heavy-tailed outlier channels and error accumulation across layers. To address these issues, we present Bit-by-Bit , a progressive QAT framework with outlier channel splitting. Our approach integrates three key components: (1) block-wise progressive training that reduces precision stage by stage, ensuring stable initialization for low-bit optimization; (2) nested structure of integer quantization grids to enable a "train once, deploy any precision" paradigm, allowing a single model to support multiple bit-widths without retraining; (3) rounding-aware outlier channel splitting, which mitigates quantization error while acting as an identity transform that preserves the quantized outputs. Furthermore, we follow microscaling groups with E4M3 scales, capturing dynamic activation ranges in alignment with OCP/NVIDIA standards. To address the lack of efficient 2-bit kernels, we developed custom operators for both W2A2 and W2A16 configurations, achieving up to 11 × speedup over BF16. Under W2A2 settings, Bit-by-Bit significantly outperforms baselines like BitDistiller and EfficientQAT on both Llama2/3, achieving a loss of only 2.25 WikiText2 PPL compared to full-precision models.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks, ensuring the safety of their outputs is increasingly critical. To mitigate the risk of policy-violating responses, numerous guardrail models have been developed for harmful-content detection. While effective on short outputs, existing guardrails degrade on long-form responses, reflecting limited semantic understanding and weak robustness to contextual noise. To address these limitations, we propose RST-Guarder, an inference-time method that improves harmful-content detection for long-form inputs without additional data curation or model training. RST-Guarder first applies a RST parser to long-form inputs to get discourse-level semantic relations among segments, and subsequently performs hierarchical probabilistic inference to aggregate segment-level safety scores produced by pre-trained guardrail models. We evaluate RST-Guarder across multiple benchmarks and a diverse set of widely used guardrail models. Experimental results demonstrate that RST-Guarder consistently improves harmful-content detection on long-form inputs, while significantly reducing false positives that incorrectly classify benign content as harmful.

Abstract:
Embodied agents in open-ended environments such as Minecraft increasingly adopt planner–controller architectures, with large language models acting as high-level planners. While planning has advanced rapidly, control remains underexplored. Existing systems commonly rely on a monolithic policy to execute subgoals across varying contexts, forcing incompatible behaviors into a shared parameter space and causing interference that scaling only partially mitigates. To address this, we propose MoEC, a Memory-Routed Mixture-of-Experts Controller for Adaptive Minecraft Control. MoEC routes via a subgoal-indexed, non-parametric expert memory and regulates capacity through failure-triggered expert growth and redundancy-aware consolidation. This design enables continual adaptation without full retraining, while maintaining parameter efficiency and with bounded inference cost. We evaluate MoEC on diverse and compositional Minecraft tasks, demonstrating significant gains in adaptability, robustness, and execution consistency over strong baselines, yielding a scalable and efficient alternative for open-ended control.

Abstract:
Automated vehicles lack natural communication channels with other road users, making external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs) essential for conveying intent and maintaining trust in shared environments. However, most eHMI studies rely on developer-crafted message-action pairs, which are difficult to adapt to diverse and dynamic traffic contexts. A promising alternative is to use Large Language Models (LLMs) as action designers that generate context-conditioned eHMI actions, yet such designers lack perceptual verification and typically depend on fixed prompts or costly human-annotated feedback for improvement.We present See2Refine, a human-free, closed-loop framework that uses vision-language models (VLMs) for perceptual evaluation as automated visual feedback to improve an LLM-based eHMI action designer. Given a driving context and a candidate eHMI action, the VLM evaluates the perceived appropriateness of the action, and this feedback is used to iteratively revise the designer’s outputs, enabling systematic refinement without human supervision.We evaluate our framework across three eHMI modalities (lightbar, eyes, and arm) and multiple LLM model sizes. Across settings, our framework consistently outperforms prompt-only LLM designers and manually specified baselines in both VLM-based metrics and human-subject evaluations. The results further indicate that the improvements are generalized across modalities and that VLM evaluations are reasonably aligned with human preferences in our controlled settings, supporting the robustness and effectiveness of See2Refine for scalable action design.

Abstract:
Bridging molecular structures and natural language is essential for controllable design. Autoregressive models struggle with long-range dependencies, while standard diffusion processes apply uniform corruption across positions, which can distort structurally informative tokens. We present BiMol-Diff, a unified diffusion framework for the paired tasks of text-conditioned molecule generation and molecule captioning. Our key component is a token-aware noise schedule that assigns position-dependent corruption based on token recovery difficulty, preserving harder-to-recover substructures during the forward process. On ChEBI-20 and M3-20M, BiMol-Diff improves molecule reconstruction with a 15.4% relative gain in Exact Match and achieves strong captioning results, attaining best BLEU and BERTScore among compared baselines. These results indicate token-aware noising improves fidelity in molecular structure-language modeling

Abstract:
Detecting fraud in financial transactions typically relies on tabular models that demand heavy feature engineering to handle high-dimensional data and offer limited interpretability, making it difficult for humans to understand predictions. Large Language Models (LLMs), in contrast, can produce human-readable explanations and facilitate feature analysis, potentially reducing the manual workload of fraud analysts and informing system refinements. However, they perform poorly when applied directly to tabular fraud detection due to the difficulty of reasoning over many features, the extreme class imbalance, and the absence of contextual information. To bridge this gap, we introduce FinFRE-RAG, a two-stage approach that applies importance-guided feature reduction to serialize a compact subset of numeric/categorical attributes into natural language and performs retrieval-augmented in-context learning over label-aware, instance-level exemplars. Across four public fraud datasets and three families of open-weight LLMs, FinFRE-RAG substantially improves F1/MCC over direct prompting and is competitive with strong tabular baselines in several settings. Although these LLMs still lag behind specialized classifiers, they narrow the performance gap and provide interpretable rationales, highlighting their value as assistive tools in fraud analysis.

Abstract:
While controllable Text-to-Speech (TTS) has achieved notable progress, most existing methods remain limited to inter-utterance-level control, making fine-grained intra-utterance expression challenging due to their reliance on non-public datasets or complex multi-stage training. In this paper, we propose TED-TTS, a training-free controllable framework for pretrained zero-shot TTS to enable intra-utterance emotion and duration expression. Specifically, we propose a segment-aware emotion conditioning strategy that combines causal masking with monotonic stream alignment filtering to isolate emotion conditioning and schedule mask transitions, enabling smooth intra-utterance emotion shifts while preserving global semantic coherence. Based on this, we further propose a segment-aware duration steering strategy to combine local duration embedding steering with global EOS logit modulation, allowing local duration adjustment while ensuring globally consistent termination. To eliminate the need for segment-level manual prompt engineering, we construct a 30,000-sample multi-emotion and duration-annotated text dataset to enable LLM-based automatic prompt construction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our training-free method not only achieves state-of-the-art intra-utterance consistency in multi-emotion and duration control, but also maintains baseline-level speech quality of the underlying TTS model. Audio samples are available at https://aclanonymous111.github.io/TED-TTS-DemoPage/.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in multimodal tasks, but remain susceptible to hallucinations, where generated text deviates from the underlying visual content. Existing hallucination detection methods primarily rely on output logits or external verification tools, often overlooking their internal mechanisms. In this work, we investigate the outputs of internal attention heads, postulating that specific heads carry the primary signals for truthful generation. However, directly probing these high-dimensional states is challenging due to the entanglement of visual-linguistic syntax and noise. To address this, we propose VIB-Probe, a novel hallucination detection and mitigation framework leveraging the Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) theory. Our method extracts discriminative patterns across layers and heads while filtering out semantic nuisances through the information bottleneck principle. Furthermore, by leveraging the gradients of our VIB probe, we identify attention heads with strong causal influence on hallucinations and introduce an inference-time intervention strategy for hallucination mitigation. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that VIB-Probe significantly outperforms existing baselines in both settings. Our code will be made publicly available.

Abstract:
Despite recent advances in Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language model (LLM) reasoning, most methods suffer from exploration collapse, as the semantic homogeneity of random rollouts traps models in narrow, over-optimized behaviors. Existing methods leverage policy entropy to encourage exploration, but face inherent limitations: global entropy regularization is susceptible to reward hacking, inducing meaningless verbosity, whereas local token-selective updates struggle with the strong inductive bias of pre-trained models. To this end, we propose Latent Policy Optimization via Iterative Information Bottleneck ( I²B-LPO), which shifts from statistical perturbation of token distributions to topological branching of reasoning trajectories. I²BLPO triggers latent branching at high-entropy states to diversify reasoning trajectories and applies the Information Bottleneck as a trajectory filter and self-reward to ensure concise and informative exploration. Empirical results on four mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that I²B-LPO achieves state-of-the-art performance, with margins of up to 5.3% in accuracy and 7.4% in diversity metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/denghuilin-cyber/IIB-LPO.

Abstract:
Advancements in Large language models (LLMs) have enabled a variety of downstream applications like story and interview script generation.However, recent research raised concerns about culture-related fairness issues in LLM-generated content.In this work, we identify and systematically investigate LLMs’ insider-outsider bias, a phenomenon where models position themselves as "insiders" of mainstream cultures during generation while externalizing less dominant cultures.We propose the InsideOut benchmark with 4,000 generation prompts and three evaluation metrics to quantify this bias through a culturally situated interview script generation task, in which an LLM is positioned as a reporter interviewing local people across 10 diverse cultures.Empirical evaluation on 5 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that while models adopt insider tones in over 88% US-contexted scripts on average, they disproportionately default to "outsider" stances for non-Western cultures.To mitigate these biases, we propose 2 inference-time methods: a baseline prompt-based Fairness Intervention Pillars (FIP) method, and a structured Mitigation via Fairness Agents (MFA) framework consisting of a Single-Agent (MFA-SA), a Hierarchical-Agent (MFA-HA), and an autonomous Agentic Planning (MFA-Plan) pipeline.Empirical results demonstrate that agent-based MFA methods achieve outstanding and robust performance in mitigating the insider-outsider bias:For instance, on the Cultural Alignment Gap (CAG) metric, MFA-SA reduces bias in Llama model by 89.70 % and MFA-HA mitigates bias in Qwen by 82.54%.These findings showcase the effectiveness of agent-based methods as a promising direction for mitigating biases in generative LLMs.

Abstract:
While Hybrid Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become the standard paradigm for training LLM agents, effective mechanisms for data allocation between these stages remain largely underexplored. Current data arbitration strategies often rely on surface-level heuristics that fail to diagnose intrinsic learning needs. Since SFT targets pattern consolidation through imitation while RL drives structural adaptation via exploration, misaligning data with these functional roles causes severe optimization interference. We propose PRISM, a dynamics-aware framework grounded in Schema Theory that arbitrates data based on its degree of cognitive conflict with the model’s existing knowledge. By analyzing the spatial geometric structure of gradients, PRISM identifies data triggering high spatial concentration as high-conflict signals that require RL for structural restructuring. In contrast, data yielding diffuse updates is routed to SFT for efficient consolidation. Extensive experiments on WebShop and ALFWorld demonstrate that PRISM achieves a Pareto improvement, outperforming state-of-the-art hybrid methods while reducing computational costs by up to 3.22 × . Our findings suggest that disentangling data based on internal optimization regimes is crucial for scalable and robust agent alignment.

Abstract:
Self-deprecation is a prevalent communicative strategy in human society, often using image-text interplay to express emotions and intentions. Despite self-deprecation is widespread in real-world conversations, the ability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to understand it remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce JanusMM, the first benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs’ understanding of self-deprecation in real-world conversations. JanusMM contains 2,016 bilingual memes from three types of social interactions and provides a dual-task evaluation framework with six new metrics. The first task assesses MLLMs’ abilities in self-deprecation recognition and reasoning, while the second task evaluates the consistency of their understanding by simulating the perspectives of the initiator and responder. We evaluate ten frontier MLLMs and find that they exhibit weak recognition and reasoning abilities, with their understanding of self-deprecation remaining inconsistent across both perspectives.

Abstract:
Detecting machine-revised text that exhibits subtle lexical differences from the original human-generated text remains a challenge. Recent detection methods, including watermarking-based, logit-based, and training-based models, struggle to capture the fine-grained semantic differences, especially for short texts. To address this issue, we propose Length-aware Momentum Contrastive Learning (LAMCL), a novel framework for multiscale machine-revised text detection that integrates two core modules. To enhance the discriminative semantic features, the Enhance Before Detection (EBD) module first fuses the original detected text with the counterpart processed by a Large Language Model (LLM), and then measures semantic consistency to distinguish between machine-revised and human-generated text. Meanwhile, based on the Momentum Contrastive Learning (MCL) framework, the Length-aware Weighting (LW) module leverages text length and label information for hard negative sampling, mitigating the ambiguity of short text attribution and boosting the robustness of representation learning. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms the existing detectors in identifying multiscale machine-revised text across diverse practical scenarios, tasks, and LLMs. The code is available at https://github.com/hangtze/LAMCL.

Abstract:
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) is an important image retrieval paradigm that enables users to retrieve a target image using a multimodal query that consists of a reference image and modification text. Although research on CIR has made significant progress, prevailing setups still rely simple modification texts that typically cover only a limited range of salient changes, which induces two limitations highly relevant to practical applications, namely Insufficient Entity Coverage and Clause-Entity Misalignment. In order to address these issues and bring CIR closer to real-world use, we construct two instruction-rich multi-modification datasets, M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR. In addition, we propose TEMA, the Text-oriented Entity Mapping Architecture, which is the first CIR framework designed for multi-modification while also accommodating simple modifications. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that TEMA’s superiority in both original and multi-modification scenarios, while maintaining an optimal balance between retrieval accuracy and computational efficiency. Our codes and constructed multi-modification dataset (M-FashionIQ and M-CIRR) are available at https://github.com/lee-zixu/ACL26-TEMA/

Abstract:
Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) have demonstrated significant potential in single-turn reasoning tasks. With the paradigm shift toward self-evolving agentic learning, models are increasingly expected to learn from trajectories by synthesizing tools or accumulating explicit experiences. However, prevailing methods typically rely on large-scale LLMs or multi-agent frameworks, which hinder their deployment in resource-constrained environments. The inherent sparsity of outcome-based rewards also poses a substantial challenge, as agents typically receive feedback only upon task completion. To address these limitations, we introduce a Tool-Memory based self-evolving agentic framework SEARL. Unlike approaches that directly utilize interaction experiences, our method constructs a structured experience memory that integrates planning with execution. This provides a novel form of state abstraction that facilitates the aggregation of actions within functionally analogous contexts, such as tool reuse. Consequently, agents not only extract explicit knowledge from historical data but also leverage inter-trajectory correlations to densify reward signals. We evaluate our framework on knowledge reasoning and complex search tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving more practical and efficient agentic learning.

Abstract:
Alignment techniques often inadvertently induce sycophancy in LLMs. While prior studies studied this behaviour in direct-answer settings, the role of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning remains under-explored: does it serve as a logical constraint that mitigates sycophancy, or a tool for post-hoc rationalization that masks it? We evaluate a range of models across objective and subjective tasks to investigate the issue.Results show that reasoning generally reduces sycophancy in final decisions but also masks sycophancy in some samples, where models construct deceptive justifications through logical inconsistencies, calculation errors, and one-sided arguments etc. Furthermore, LLMs are more prone to sycophancy in subjective tasks and under authority-bias. Our mechanistic analysis reveals that the tendency of sycophancy in LLMs is dynamic during the reasoning process rather than being pre-determined at the input.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved exceptional performance in complex reasoning via Chain-of-Thought (CoT), yet the associated computational costs remain prohibitive. CoT reasoning contains significant untapped efficiency potential across two dimensions: temporal redundancy , where reasoning steps may be unnecessary, and spatial redundancy , where computations can be performed at reduced precision. While current optimization techniques often necessitate resource-intensive fine-tuning or data curation, we introduce ASTRO (Adaptive Spatial and Temporal Redundancy Optimization), a training-free framework that simultaneously addresses both dimensions. ASTRO leverages Dewey’s reflective thinking model to segment reasoning phases, applying a progressive precision reduction strategy coupled with an entropy-based confidence mechanism for adaptive termination. Empirical results across diverse reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ASTRO achieves up to an 11.3 × efficiency gain without compromising accuracy, highlighting the advantages of holistic multi-dimensional redundancy management over isolated optimization methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, yet their performance in English significantly outperforms that in low-resource languages, raising fairness concerns in multilingual applications. Existing approaches either rely on costly multilingual training or employ prompting with external translation tools, both of which are resource-intensive and sensitive to translation quality. To address these limitations, we propose a training-free inference-time method to enhance Multilingual Reasoning capabilities via Representation Engineering (MRRE) without using any additional training data or tools. MRRE sequentially injects two precomputed vectors at specific layers during inference processing: cross-lingual reasoning enhancement vectors, which steer non-English reasoning representations toward English space to unlock multilingual reasoning, and target-language output anchoring vectors, which restore the distribution of the target language to preserve input–output language consistency. Comprehensive experiments across six advanced LLMs and LVLMs on four reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that MRRE consistently enhances non-English reasoning by an average gain of 5.48% and up to 7.54% in low-resource languages (e.g., Thai and Swahili), while improving input-output language consistency by 3.78%.

Abstract:
While reasoning-enhanced large language models perform strongly on English medical tasks, a persistent multilingual gap remains, with substantially weaker reasoning in local languages, limiting equitable global medical deployment. To bridge this gap, we introduce Med-CoReasoner, a language-informed co-reasoning framework that elicits parallel English and local-language reasoning, abstracts them into structured concepts, and integrates local clinical knowledge into an English logical scaffold via concept-level alignment and retrieval. This design combines the structural robustness of English reasoning with the practice-grounded expertise encoded in local languages. To evaluate multilingual medical reasoning beyond multiple-choice settings, we construct MultiMed-X, a benchmark covering seven languages with expert-annotated long-form question answering and natural language inference tasks, comprising 350 instances per language. Experiments across three benchmarks show that Med-CoReasoner improves multilingual reasoning performance by an average of 5%, with particularly substantial gains in low-resource languages. Moreover, model distillation and expert evaluation analysis further confirm that Med-CoReasoner produces clinically sound and culturally grounded reasoning traces.

Abstract:
Chart-to-code generation demands strict visual precision and syntactic correctness from Vision-Language Models (VLMs). However, existing approaches are fundamentally constrained by data-centric limitations: despite the availability of growing chart-to-code datasets, simply scaling homogeneous chart-code pairs conflates visual perception with program logic, preventing models from fully leveraging the richness of multimodal supervision. We present CharTide, a novel data-centric framework that systematically redesigns both training and alignment data for chart-to-code generation. First, we construct a 2M-sample dataset via a Tri-Perspective Tuning strategy, explicitly decoupling training into visual perception, pure-text code logic, and modality fusion streams, enabling a 7B model to surpass specialized baselines using only supervised data. Second, we reformulate alignment as a data verification problem rather than a heuristic scoring task. To this end, we introduce an Inquiry-Driven RL framework grounded in the principle of information invariance: a downstream model should yield consistent answers to identical visual queries across both original and generated charts. Moving beyond rigid rule matching or VLM scoring, we employ a frozen Inspector to objectively verify generated charts through atomic QA tasks, providing verifiable reward signals based on answer accuracy. Experiments on ChartMimic, Plot2Code, and ChartX show that CharTide-7B/8B significantly outperforms open-source baselines, surpasses GPT-4o, and is competitive with GPT-5.

Abstract:
Code Language Models (CodeLLMs) traditionally learn attention based solely on statistical input-output token correlations ("machine attention"). In contrast, human developers rely on intuition, selectively fixating on semantically salient tokens during program comprehension. We present EyeMulator, a model-agnostic technique to align CodeLLM attention with human visual attention without architectural changes. By extracting scan paths from eye-tracking data, we derive token-level attention weights used to augment the loss function during fine-tuning. This induces the model to mimic human focus. Our evaluation across StarCoder, Llama-3.2, and DeepSeek-Coder shows that EyeMulator significantly outperforms baselines, achieving gains of over 30 CodeBLEU points in translation and up to 22 BERTScore points in summarization. Ablation studies confirm that these gains stem directly from replicating human attention dynamics. Artifacts are available at https://zenodo.org/records/17205682.

Abstract:
Existing knowledge graph completion research is gradually shifting from representing logical semantics of static facts to modeling evolving semantics of temporal facts, yet lacks collaborative modeling of both within a unified framework. To this end, we use concept of snapshots to decompose fact features into two complementary mechanisms: (a) intra-snapshot semantic coupling, where entities and relations exhibit snapshot-specific meanings through multidimensional interactions; (b) trans-snapshot evolutionary synergy, where relations between entities evolve across snapshots and manifest varying states. These snapshot mechanisms jointly reveal underlying logic of facts. To track them, we propose TeCES, a framework for high-fidelity modeling of evolving snapshots. TeCES embeds facts into a 2-grade geometric algebra (GA) system to capture complex semantics via multilevel structures. Temporal information is attached to each entity for mapping into snapshot spaces, while relations and timestamps are reconfigured into composite GA representations. Geometric products enable multidimensional interactions, revealing relation state changes over time. Lastly, the head entity at each snapshot combines with fused temporal-relational representation via geometric product to approximate the target tail entity at multiple levels. Overall, TeCES supports joint modeling of evolving snapshots within a lightweight GA system and significantly outperforms SOTA models on six benchmarks.

Abstract:
Training and serving large language models (LLMs) is resource-intensive, making reliable intellectual property (IP) protection and black-box ownership verification increasingly important.Model fingerprinting enables such verification by injecting a small set of secret query–response behaviors, but many existing fingerprints rely on explicit markers or predetermined outputs that are weakly grounded in prompt semantics.This semantic mismatch yields atypical fingerprint responses, reduces stealthiness, and exposes fingerprints to removal by response normalization.We formalize this vulnerability via a new removal attack, Generation Revision Intervention (GRI), which applies system-prompt-level revision and response standardization to steer models toward typical answers, substantially compromising representative injected baselines.To close this semantic gap, we propose the Implicit Fingerprints (ImF): we encode ownership information into a natural-looking target response y via linguistic steganography, then derive a CoT-augmented query x that embeds semantic cues from y to guide the model toward an output sufficiently close to y for decoding-based verification.Experiments on 15 LLMs show that ImF improves stealthiness and remains verifiable under model updates and deployment-time prompt interventions; additional analyses further show stability under common decoding variation and realistic related-model partial merging.

Abstract:
The evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) for software engineering has shifted towards complex, repository-level tasks. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on coarse-grained pass rates that treat programming proficiency as a monolithic capability, obscuring specific cognitive bottlenecks. Furthermore, the static nature of these benchmarks renders them vulnerable to data contamination and performance saturation. To address these limitations, we introduce CoreCodeBench, a configurable repository-level benchmark designed to dissect coding capabilities through atomized tasks. Leveraging our automated framework, CorePipe, we extract and transform Python repositories into a comprehensive suite of tasks that isolate distinct cognitive demands within identical code contexts. Unlike static evaluations, CoreCodeBench supports controllable difficulty scaling to prevent saturation and ensures superior data quality. It achieves a 78.55% validity yield, significantly surpassing the 31.7% retention rate of SWE-bench-Verified. Extensive experiments with state-of-the-art LLMs reveal a significant capability misalignment, evidenced by distinct ranking shifts across cognitive dimensions. This indicates that coding proficiency is non-monolithic, as strength in one aspect does not necessarily translate to others. These findings underscore the necessity of our fine-grained taxonomy in diagnosing model deficiencies and offer a sustainable, rigorous framework for evolving code intelligence. Code of CorePipe framework and data of CoreCodeBench are available in https://github.com/AGI-Eval-Official/CoreCodeBench and https://huggingface.co/collections/tubehhh/corecodebench.

Abstract:
With the widespread application of LLM-based agents across various domains, their complexity has introduced new security threats. Existing red-team methods mostly rely on modifying user prompts, which lack adaptability to new data and may impact the agent’s performance. To address the challenge, this paper proposes the JailAgent framework, which completely avoids modifying the user prompt. Specifically, it implicitly manipulates the agent’s reasoning trajectory and memory retrieval with three key stages: Trigger Extraction, Reasoning Hijacking, and Constraint Tightening. Through precise trigger identification, real-time adaptive mechanisms, and an optimized objective function, JailAgent demonstrates outstanding performance in cross-model and cross-scenario environments.

Abstract:
The quadratic complexity of attention mechanisms poses a critical bottleneck for large language models processing long contexts. While dynamic sparse attention methods offer input-adaptive efficiency, they face fundamental trade-offs: requiring preprocessing, lacking global evaluation, violating query independence, or incurring high computational overhead. We present RRAttention, a novel dynamic sparse attention method that simultaneously achieves all desirable properties through a head round-robin (RR) sampling strategy. By rotating query sampling positions across attention heads within each stride, RRAttention maintains query independence while enabling efficient global pattern discovery with stride-level aggregation. Our method reduces complexity from O(L 2 ) to O(L 2 /S 2 ) and employs adaptive Top- 𝜏 selection for optimal sparsity. Extensive experiments on natural language understanding (HELMET) and multimodal video comprehension (Video-MME) demonstrate that RRAttention recovers over 99% of full attention performance while computing only half of the attention blocks, achieving 2.4 × speedup at 128K context length and outperforming existing dynamic sparse attention methods. The code is available at [https://github.com/PaddlePaddle/PaddleFleet](https://github.com/PaddlePaddle/PaddleFleet) (see ‘Research/RRAttention‘).

Abstract:
Machine learning models are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, but even aligned models such as Mistral and LLaVA still exhibit unsafe behaviors inherited from pre-training. Current alignment methods like SFT and RLHF primarily encourage models to generate preferred responses, but do not explicitly remove the unsafe subnetworks that trigger harmful outputs. In this work, we introduce a resource-efficient pruning framework that directly identifies and removes parameters associated with unsafe behaviors while preserving model utility. Our method employs a gradient-free attribution mechanism, requiring only modest GPU resources, and generalizes across architectures and quantized variants. Empirical evaluations on ML models show substantial reductions in unsafe generations and improved robustness against jailbreak attacks, with minimal utility loss. From the perspective of the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, our results suggest that ML models contain “unsafe tickets” responsible for harmful behaviors, and pruning reveals “safety tickets” that maintain performance while aligning outputs. This provides a lightweight, post-hoc alignment strategy suitable for deployment in resource-constrained settings.

Abstract:
Interleaved-Modal Chain-of-Thought (I-MCoT) advances vision-language reasoning, such as Visual Question Answering (VQA). This paradigm integrates specially selected visual evidence from the input image into the context of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enabling them to ground their reasoning logic in these details. Accordingly, the efficacy of an I-MCoT framework relies on identifying what to see (evidence selection) and when to see it (triggering of insertions). However, existing methods fall short in both aspects. First, for selection, they rely on attention signals, which are unreliable—particularly under severe granularity imbalance between the brief textual query and the informative image. Second, for triggering, they adopt static triggers, which fail to capture the VLMs’ dynamic needs for visual evidence. To this end, we propose a novel I-MCoT framework, Active Information-driven Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought (AIM-CoT), which aims to improve both evidence selection and insertion triggering via: (1) Context-enhanced Attention-map Generation (CAG) to mitigate granularity imbalance via textual context enhancement; (2) Active Visual Probing (AVP) to proactively select the most informative evidence via an information foraging process; and (3) Dynamic Attention-shift Trigger (DAT) to precisely activate insertions when VLM’s attention shifts from text to visual context. Experiments across three benchmarks and four backbones demonstrate AIM-CoT’s consistent superiority. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AIMCoT.

Abstract:
Comprehending long visual documents, where information is distributed across extensive pages of text and visual elements, is a critical but challenging task for modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Existing approaches falter on a fundamental challenge: evidence localization. They struggle to retrieve relevant pages and overlook fine-grained details within visual elements, leading to limited performance and model hallucination. To address this, we propose DocLens, a tool-augmented multi-agent framework that effectively “zooms in” on evidence like a lens. It first navigates from the full document to specific visual elements on relevant pages, then employs a sampling-adjudication mechanism to generate a single, reliable answer. Paired with Gemini-2.5-Pro, DocLens achieves state-of-the-art performance on MMLongBench-Doc and FinRAGBench-V, surpassing even human experts. The framework’s superiority is particularly evident on vision-centric and unanswerable queries, demonstrating the power of its enhanced localization capabilities.

Abstract:
The generation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) models is affected by factors such as the quality and order of input documents, indicating that their ability to utilize documents remains underdeveloped. This ability encompasses not only identifying useful documents from inputs but also minimizing positional bias and filtering irrelevant documents. To achieve this, key challenges include the model’s internal estimation of document importance and positional bias. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on the properties of attention weights, examining the impact of factors like aggregation methods, document quality, document position, token type, and so on. Based on our findings, we propose strategies to enhance document utilization from three perspectives: document ranking, placement, and filtering. Comprehensive experiments show that our method outperforms baselines and improves document utilization effectiveness in a training-free manner.

Abstract:
Creativity has become a core competence in the era of LLMs and human–AI collaboration, underpinning innovation in real-world problem solving. Crucially, the systematic improvement of creativity necessitates scientifically valid assessment instruments. Psychometric research recognizes context-based assessment as an effective way to measure creative thinking. However, high-quality expert-designed contexts remain scarce. Existing LLM-based generators often struggle with insufficient assessment cues, weak narrative coherence, limited stylistic diversity, and poor support for creative thinking. To address these challenges, we propose AlphaContext, an evolutionary tree-based psychometric context generator for creativity assessment. First, the HyperTree Outline Planner formalizes expert-designed outlining as a rule-guided hypertree and performs top-down hierarchical planning. The MCTS-based Context Generator fills the outline via MCTS to balance global structure and local quality. Then, the Evolutionary Context Optimizer evolves contexts with MAP-Elites by repeatedly updating niche elites to jointly improve diversity and quality. Finally, the Assessment-Guided Evolution Refiner simulates virtual participants with diverse styles and recycles weak contexts for further evolution. Experiments show that AlphaContext yields an average improvement of 8% over competitive methods across 6 quality metrics.

Abstract:
Agentic workflows are commonly used to guide large language models in solving complex reasoning tasks. However, existing automated workflow generation methods primarily rely on stepwise local refinement or tree-based search over a single evolving workflow. Under limited optimization budgets, this paradigm constrains structural depth, hindering the discovery of workflows that require deep compositional structure. To address this limitation, we propose FusionFlow, a framework centered on workflow fusion. Unlike incremental refinement, fusion enables structural leaps by synthesizing multiple independently evolved workflows, allowing exploration of deeper regions of the workflow space within a finite budget. To make fusion effective, FusionFlow integrates local optimization, task-specific differentiation, and a dynamic scheduling mechanism. Experiments on six reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that FusionFlow consistently outperforms existing automated workflow generation methods. Further ablation and analysis confirm that fusion is the key driver of deep structural exploration, highlighting fusion-driven exploration as an effective approach for overcoming depth limitations in automated workflow generation.

Abstract:
Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for providing step-level feedback when evaluating the reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs), which frequently produce chains of thought (CoTs) containing errors even when the final answer is correct. However, existing PRM datasets remain expensive to construct, prone to annotation errors, and predominantly limited to the mathematical domain.This work introduces a novel and scalable approach to PRM dataset generation based on planning logical problems expressed in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL). Using this method, we generate a corpus of approximately one million reasoning steps across various PDDL domains and use it to train PRMs. Experimental results show that augmenting widely-used PRM training datasets with PDDL-derived data yields substantial improvements in both mathematical and non-mathematical reasoning, as demonstrated across multiple benchmarks.These findings indicate that planning problems constitute a scalable and effective resource for generating robust, precise, and fine-grained training data for PRMs, going beyond the classical mathematical sources that dominate this field.

Abstract:
Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable progress, yet their evaluation still relies on a narrow paradigm: evaluating one question at a time. This single-question setup suffers from two major limitations: (1) vulnerability to data contamination and diminishing difficulty, forcing costly creation of new questions with significant human effort, (2) failure to evaluate models under multi-context pressure, a key requirement for real-world deployment. To bridge this gap, we present REST (Reasoning Evaluation through Simultaneous Testing), a stress-testing framework that exposes LRMs to multiple problems simultaneously. Beyond basic reasoning, REST evaluates two under-tested capabilities: contextual priority allocation and robustness against contextual interference. Our evaluation of more than 30 advanced reasoning models on 9 reasoning benchmarks reveals several striking findings: Even state-of-the-art (SOTA) models such as DeepSeek-R1 exhibit substantial performance degradation under stress testing, challenging the prevailing assumption that "LLMs are multi-problem solvers". Crucially, REST demonstrates stronger discriminative power than existing benchmarks, revealing performance gaps among models that exhibit similar, near-ceiling performance under traditional evaluation. Some key insights emerge from our analysis: (1) the "overthinking trap" is a critical factor contributing to the performance degradation; (2) models trained with the "Long2Short" technique preserve more of their single-problem accuracy under REST, outperforming their standard-trained counterparts. These results establish REST as a cost-efficient, future-proof evaluation paradigm while reducing reliance on continuous human annotation. Code is available at https://github.com/opendatalab/REST.

Abstract:
The rapid advance of automatic survey generation (ASG) has created a critical evaluation challenge. Existing evaluation methods suffer from both cognitive dimensional simplification and methodological unreliability, primarily due to the over-reliance on the ”LLM-as-a-Judge” approach. To bridge this gap, we establish Bloom-Eval, a six-tiered benchmark based on Bloom’s Taxonomy that reliably evaluates ASG systems by prioritizing deterministic algorithms and introducing our GRADE approach for abstract abilities. Furthermore, we construct a large-scale, cross-disciplinary dataset of over 3,000 high-quality papers. Our empirical study on this benchmark reveals that while leading ASG systems are proficient format organizers, they remain unqualified knowledge integrators. This work aims to redefine ASG evaluation standards, shifting the research focus from the formal mimicry of surface structure to the cognitive deepening of intellectual content. Our method provides the ASG field with a systematic, reproducible, and theoretically grounded benchmark to guide future research.

Abstract:
Interleaved multimodal understanding and generation—where models can interactively comprehend and produce images and text in arbitrary orders—has emerged as a key research direction in generative Multimodal Large Language Models(MLLMs). Such interleaved image–text content plays an increasingly important role in information dissemination. However, the compounded persuasive power of multimodal narratives also raises the risk of factual misinformation. Despite this, existing benchmarks lack effective mechanisms to evaluate factual consistency in interleaved image–text content. To bridge this gap, we introduce FactVerse, a benchmark dedicated to evaluating factual consistency in interleaved image-text generation. FactVerse comprises 3,000 human-verified instances across four categories and 50 domains, supporting both English and Chinese. We also establish a multi-dimensional evaluation framework designed to rigorously assess factual consistency. Experiments demonstrate that our framework achieves high alignment with human judgments, significantly outperforming existing evaluation methods. Furthermore, our analysis reveals systematic deficiencies in current models, offering critical insights for future design.

Abstract:
Visual hallucination remains a major obstacle to the reliability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). We argue that this issue originates from a fundamental statistical misspecification: the conventional softmax attention implicitly assumes i.i.d. noise, yet real LVLM attention patterns exhibit structured and competitive biases (e.g., attention sinks) that violate this assumption. To address this mismatch, we introduce Latent Attention Denoising (LAD), a principled and training-free framework that recasts attention calibration as a one-step score-based denoising process. LAD employs an interpretable energy function to derive an analytic score and applies a single Langevin-inspired update to actively steer corrupted attention logits toward more faithful configurations. This intervention imposes negligible computational overhead and operates at a speed comparable to standard greedy decoding. Extensive evaluations across diverse architectures confirm that LAD achieves superior performance on both generative and discriminative tasks, effectively mitigating hallucinations while maintaining efficiency comparable to standard decoding.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong program repair performance but often suffer from over-editing, where excessive modifications overwrite correct code and hinder bug localization. We systematically quantify its impact and introduce precise repair task, which maximizes reuse of correct code while fixing only buggy parts. Building on this insight, we propose PRepair, a framework that mitigates over-editing and improves repair accuracy. PRepair has two components: Self-Breaking, which generates diverse buggy programs via controlled bug injection and min–max sampling, and Self-Repairing, which trains models with Edit-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (EA-GRPO) using an edit-aware reward to encourage minimal yet correct edits. Experiments show that PRepair improves repair precision by up to 31.4% under fix 1 @1 , a metric that jointly considers repair correctness and extent, and significantly increases decoding throughput when combined with speculative editing, demonstrating its potential for precise and practical code repair.

Abstract:
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have minimized the fluency gap between languages. This advancement, however, exposes models to the risk of biased behavior, as knowledge and norms may propagate across languages. In this work we aim to quantify models’ inter- and intra-lingual biases, via their ability to answer locale-ambiguous questions. To this end, we present LocQA, a test set containing 2,156 questions in 12 languages, referring to various locale-dependent facts such as laws, dates, and measurements. The questions do not contain indications of the locales they relate to, other than the querying language itself. LLMs’ responses to LocQA locale-ambiguous questions thus reveal models’ implicit priors. We used LocQA to evaluate 32 models, and detected two types of structural biases. Inter-lingually, we show a global bias towards answers relevant to the US-locale, even when models are asked in languages other than English. Moreover, we discovered that this global bias is exacerbated in models that underwent instruction tuning, compared to their base counterparts. Intra-lingually, we show that when multiple locales are relevant for the same language, models act as demographic probability engines, prioritizing locales with larger populations. Taken together, insights from LocQA may help in shaping LLMs’ desired local behavior, and in quantifying the impact of various training phases on different kinds of biases.

Abstract:
Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide a structured representation of real-world facts as triples consisting of entities and their relationships. With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), recent studies increasingly explore LLMs for end-to-end KG construction from text. In particular, generative knowledge extraction (GKE) builds KGs by directly generating structured triples from documents. However, generation errors are inevitable, and the resulting KGs often contain triples that do not align with the facts expressed in the source text. To address these issues, we propose GraphRefine, a framework that performs triple-level refinement on KGs constructed via GKE. We first analyze factual inconsistencies that arise in GKE and categorize their types based on a human evaluation. We then construct training data reflecting these types and fine-tune an LLM as a KG refiner. Given a draft KG, the fine-tuned refiner selects a refinement operation for each triple and, if needed, deletes, edits, or rewrites it to reduce factual inconsistencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GraphRefine goes beyond deletion-only approaches and improves KG quality from diverse perspectives.

Abstract:
Guqin (古琴) Jianzi (減字) is an open and freely compositional tablature system that encodes performance actions rather than acoustic outcomes. Its automatic recognition remains largely unexplored, as conventional OCR assumes a closed and enumerable glyph set and struggles with Jianzi’s unbounded composition and manuscript-level variability.We introduce Zero-shot Jianzi Recognition, which formulates Jianzi recognition as vision-to-sequence prediction of canonical component sequences under a zero-shot split. To enable scalable supervision, we construct Synthetic-JZ from aligned online composition metadata. We then synthesize manuscript-like training images via component-wise style recomposition and manuscript-domain noise modeling, and fine-tune a vision–language model for end-to-end component sequence recognition. At inference time, a lightweight legality-guided correction module re-ranks decoding candidates, suppressing structural hallucinations without modifying the backbone.Experiments on two benchmarks show that our method achieves 63.02% sequence accuracy on Real-JZ, our manually annotated real-world Jianzi benchmark, surpassing Gemini-3-Pro by 35.11%. This result highlights the feasibility of reliable automated Jianzi recognition and its potential for large-scale digitization of historical Guqin Jianzi Pu manuscripts.

Abstract:
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) aims to answer temporal questions using knowledge from Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs).Existing LLM-based TKGQA methods typically utilize RAG-based or Agent-based paradigms, yet both struggle to construct reliable temporal evidence chains. RAG-based approaches primarily rely on semantic retrieval to fetch question-relevant contexts but overlook the structural dependencies within TKGs, leading to broken evidence chains, whereas iterative agents are prone to error propagation during multi-step reasoning.To address these limitations, we propose TECQA, a framework designed to construct temporal evidence chains for LLM reasoning. Firstly, TECQA employs structure-guided subgraph retrieval to capture structural dependencies and intermediate reasoning paths. Subsequently, it utilizes a k-nearest temporal neighbor pruning strategy to filter irrelevant noise while strictly preserving the continuous local history surrounding critical events. Finally, the retained temporal neighbors are serialized by temporal proximity to explicitly reconstruct a coherent temporal evidence chain. Extensive experiments on MultiTQ and CronQuestions demonstrate that TECQA achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming strong baselines by 45.3% particularly on complex queries. Code is available at https://github.com/SimonsLiu/TECQA .

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the response capabilities of language models by integrating external knowledge sources. However, document chunking as an important part of RAG system often lacks effective evaluation tools. This paper first analyzes why existing RAG evaluation benchmarks are inadequate for assessing document chunking quality, specifically due to evidence sparsity. Based on this conclusion, we propose HiCBench, which includes manually annotated multi-level document chunking points, synthesized evidence-dense question answer(QA) pairs, and their corresponding evidence sources. We also propose HiChunk, a hierarchical document structuring framework using fine-tuned LLMs and the Auto-Merge retrieval algorithm to enhance retrieval quality. Experiments demonstrate that HiCBench effectively evaluates the impact of different chunking methods across the entire RAG pipeline. Moreover, HiChunk achieves better chunking quality within reasonable time consumption, thereby enhancing the overall performance of RAG systems. Source code is available at https://github.com/TencentCloudADP/hichunk .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit highly anisotropic internal representations, often characterized by massive activations, a phenomenon where a small subset of feature dimensions possesses magnitudes significantly larger than the rest. While prior works view these extreme dimensions primarily as artifacts to be managed, we propose a distinct perspective: these dimensions serve as intrinsic interpretable functional units arising from domain specialization. Specifically, we propose a simple magnitude-based criterion to identify Domain-Critical Dimensions in a training-free manner. Our analyses reveal that such dimensions behave as interpretable semantic detectors for symbolic/quantitative patterns or domain-specific terms. In addition, we introduce Critical Dimension Steering, which applies activation steering exclusively to the identified dimensions. Empirical results show that this approach outperforms conventional whole-dimension steering in domain adaptation and jailbreaking scenarios.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have traditionally been aligned through one-size-fits-all approaches that assume uniform human preferences, fundamentally overlooking the diversity in user values and needs. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for scalable personalized alignment of LLMs. We establish a systematic preference space characterizing psychological and behavioral dimensions, alongside diverse persona representations for robust preference inference in real-world scenarios. Building upon this foundation, we introduce AlignX, a large-scale dataset of over 1.3 million personalized preference examples, and develop two complementary alignment approaches: in-context alignment directly conditioning on persona representations and preference-bridged alignment modeling intermediate preference distributions. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over existing methods, with an average 17.06% accuracy gain across four benchmarks while exhibiting a strong adaptation capability to novel preferences, robustness to limited user data, and precise preference controllability. These results validate our approach toward user-adaptive AI systems.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown strong capabilities in solving complex tasks. As MAS become increasingly autonomous in various safety-critical tasks, detecting malicious agents has become a critical security concern. Although existing graph anomaly detection (GAD)-based defenses can identify anomalous agents, they mainly rely on coarse sentence-level information and overlook fine-grained lexical cues, leading to suboptimal performance. Moreover, the lack of interpretability in these methods limits their reliability and real-world applicability. To address these limitations, we propose , an explainable and fine-grained safeguarding framework for detecting malicious agents in MAS. To incorporate both coarse and fine-grained textual information for anomalous agent identification, we utilize a bi-level agent encoder to jointly model the sentence- and token-level representations of each agent. A theme-based anomaly detector further captures the evolving discussion focus in MAS dialogues, while a bi-level score fusion mechanism quantifies token-level contributions for explanation. Extensive experiments across diverse MAS topologies and attack scenarios demonstrate robust detection performance and strong interpretability of XG-Guard.

Abstract:
Generating synthetic datasets via large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising approach to improve LLM performance.However, LLMs inherently reflect biases in their training data, leading to a critical challenge: when models are trained on synthetic data, they may propagate and amplify the inherent biases that can significantly impact fairness and robustness on downstream tasks—a phenomenon we term bias inheritance. This work presents the first systematic investigation in understanding, analyzing, and mitigating bias inheritance. We fine-tune LLMs with a combined dataset of real and LLM-augmented data with varied bias ratio as the proportion of augmented data. Through systematic experiments across 10 classification and generation tasks, we analyze how 6 different types of biases manifest. Our results indicate that bias inheritance harms downstream task performance in bias directly-related classification and generation tasks. Then, our analysis identifies three key misalignment factors: misalignment of values, group data, and data distributions. Based on these insights, we propose three mitigation strategies: token-based, mask-based, and loss-based approaches, which can work differently on various tasks and bias, indicating the substantial challenges to mitigate bias inheritance. We hope this work can provide insights to the research of LLM data augmentation.

Abstract:
Prior work has shown that large language models (LLMs) often converge to accurate input embedding for numbers, based on sinusoidal representations.In this work, we demonstrate that these representations are in fact strikingly systematic, to the point of being almost perfectly universal: different LLM families develop equivalent sinusoidal structures, and number representations are broadly interchangeable in a large swathe of experimental setups.We show that properly factoring in this characteristic is crucial when it comes to assessing how accurately LLMs encode numeric and other ordinal information, and that mechanistically enhancing this sinusoidality can also lead to reductions of LLMs’ arithmetic errors.

Abstract:
Large language models increasingly serve as conversational agents that adopt personas and role-play characters at user request. This capability, while valuable, raises concerns about sycophancy: the tendency to provide responses that validate users rather than prioritize factual accuracy. While prior work has established that sycophancy poses risks to AI safety and alignment, the relationship between specific personality traits of adopted personas and the degree of sycophantic behavior remains unexplored. We present a systematic investigation of how persona agreeableness influences sycophancy across 13 small, open-weight language models ranging from 0.6B to 20B parameters. We develop a benchmark comprising 275 personas evaluated on NEO-IPIP agreeableness subscales and expose each persona to 4,950 sycophancy-eliciting prompts spanning 33 topic categories. Our analysis reveals that 9 of 13 models exhibit statistically significant positive correlations between persona agreeableness and sycophancy rates, with Pearson correlations reaching r = 0.87 and effect sizes as large as Cohen’s d = 2.33 . These findings demonstrate that agreeableness functions as a reliable predictor of persona-induced sycophancy, with direct implications for the deployment of role-playing AI systems and the development of alignment strategies that account for personality-mediated deceptive behaviors

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for text-attributed graph (TAG) learning, yet effectively integrating LLM semantics with graph structural information remains challenging. Embeddings obtained from frozen LLMs lack topology awareness, while fine-tuning LLMs is often computationally expensive. Moreover, LLM embeddings are high-dimensional, and naively reducing dimensionality tends to destroy semantics. To address these issues, we propose GASE, a framework for learning Graph-Aware Semantic Embeddings using frozen LLMs. GASE consists of two key stages: First, we introduce a Training-Free Structure-Aware Semantic Extraction (TSSE) module. Through inter-layer semantic feedback and progressive masked attention, it efficiently compresses and propagates semantic context from neighboring nodes without updating LLM parameters. Second, we propose a Subspace Decomposition and Structural Injection (SDSI) strategy. Embeddings obtained from TSSE are decomposed into a semantic-rich subspace and a structural injection subspace, and structural signals are injected into the latter, which preserves original semantics while integrating graph information. Experiments demonstrate that GASE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on node classification and achieves a 5× speedup over fine-tuning-based methods.

Abstract:
While scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) during pre-training have been extensively studied, their behavior under reinforcement learning (RL) post-training remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates the scaling behavior of Large Language Model (LLM) reinforcement learning post-training, focusing on mathematical reasoning. Through experiments across the Qwen2.5 series (0.5B to 72B), we characterize how model scale, data, and compute interact. Our analysis yields four key findings: 1. Larger models consistently demonstrate superior compute and data efficiency. 2. The relationship between model performance and training resources follows a predictive power-law across both base and instruction-tuned models. 3. RL learning efficiency exhibits a latent saturation trend with increasing model scale. 4. In data-constrained regimes, performance is primarily driven by the total volume of training data rather than sample uniqueness. These results offer practical guidelines for scaling reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning post-training.

Abstract:
Multimodal Stance Detection (MSD) is a crucial task for understanding public opinion on social media. Existing methods predominantly operate by learning to fuse modalities. They lack an explicit reasoning process to discern how inter-modal dynamics, such as irony or conflict, collectively shape the user’s final stance, leading to frequent misjudgments. To address this, we advocate for a paradigm shift from learning to fuse to learning to reason. We introduce MIND, a Meta-cognitive Intuitive-reflective Network for Dual-reasoning. Inspired by the dual-process theory of human cognition, MIND operationalizes a self-improving loop. It first generates a rapid, intuitive hypothesis by querying evolving Modality and Semantic Experience Pools. Subsequently, a meta-cognitive reflective stage uses Modality-CoT and Semantic-CoT to scrutinize this initial judgment, distill superior adaptive strategies, and evolve the experience pools themselves. These dual experience structures are continuously refined during training and recalled at inference to guide robust and context-aware stance decisions. Extensive experiments on the MMSD benchmark demonstrate that our MIND significantly outperforms most baseline models and exhibits strong generalization.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in reasoning-intensive tasks, but they remain vulnerable to harmful content generation, particularly in the mid-to-late steps of their reasoning processes. Current defense methods, however, depend on costly fine-tuning and additional expert knowledge, which limits their scalability.In this work, we propose ReasoningGuard, an inference-time safeguard for LRMs.It injects timely safety aha moments during the reasoning process to guide the model towards harmless yet helpful reasoning.Our approach leverages the internal attention mechanisms of the LRM to accurately identify key points in the reasoning path, triggering safety-oriented reflections.To safeguard both the subsequent reasoning steps and the final answers, we implement a scaling sampling strategy during decoding to select the optimal reasoning path.With minimal additional inference cost, ReasoningGuard effectively mitigates four types of jailbreak attacks, including recent ones targeting the reasoning process of LRMs. Our approach outperforms nine existing safeguards, providing state-of-the-art defenses while avoiding common exaggerated safety issues.

Abstract:
Applying language models (LMs) to tables is challenging due to the mismatch between the two-dimensional structure of tables and the one-dimensional inputs expected by LMs. This mismatch forces linearization, making LMs particularly sensitive to irrelevant cells. Subtable selection mitigates this challenge by isolating question-relevant content prior to answer generation. However, existing approaches either rely on independent row or column selection, failing to capture cross-row and cross-column dependencies, or attempt global reasoning and face challenges similar to holistic table QA under noisy contexts. We propose PieTa (Piece of Table), a divide-and-conquer subtable selection framework that progressively aggregates locally selected evidence without requiring explicit global reasoning. PieTa uses an iterative, window-based multi-resolution process to construct compact subtables that capture global dependencies while limiting LM exposure to irrelevant content. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PieTa consistently outperforms prior subtable-based and holistic table QA approaches.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools. In practice, however, LLMs are often exposed to tools that are irrelevant to the user’s query, in which case the desired behavior is to refrain from invocations. In this work, we identify a widespread yet overlooked mechanistic flaw in tool refusal, which we term structural alignment bias: Even when a tool fails to serve the user’s goal, LLMs still tend to invoke it whenever query attributes can be validly assigned to tool parameters. To systematically study this bias, we introduce SABEval, a new dataset that decouples structural alignment from semantic relevance. Our analysis shows that structural alignment bias induces severe tool-invocation errors in LLMs, yet remains largely unaccounted for in existing evaluations. To investigate the internal mechanisms underlying this bias, we propose Contrastive Attention Attribution, which reveals two competing pathways for semantic checking and structural matching. The relative strength of these pathways drives LLMs’ tool invocation decisions. Based on these findings, we further introduce a rebalancing strategy that effectively mitigates structural alignment bias, as demonstrated by extensive experiments, without degrading general tool-use capabilities.

Abstract:
Realizing endogenous narrative evolution in LLM-based multi-agent systems is hindered by the inherent stochasticity of generative emergence. In particular, long-horizon simulations suffer from social memory stacking, where conflicting relational states accumulate without resolution, and narrative-spatial dissonance, where spatial logic detaches from the evolving plot. To bridge this gap, we propose EvoSpark, a framework specifically designed to sustain logically coherent long-horizon narratives within Endogenous Interactive Agent Societies. To ensure consistency, the Stratified Narrative Memory employs a Role Socio-Evolutionary Base as living cognition, dynamically metabolizing experiences to resolve historical conflicts. Complementarily, a Generative Mise-en-Scène mechanism enforces Role-Location-Plot alignment, synchronizing character presence with the narrative flow. Underpinning these is the Unified Narrative Operation Engine, which integrates an Emergent Character Grounding Protocol to transform stochastic sparking into persistent characters. This engine establishes a substrate that expands a minimal premise into an open-ended, evolving story world. Experiments demonstrate that EvoSpark significantly outperforms baselines across diverse paradigms, enabling the sustained generation of expressive and coherent narrative experiences.

Abstract:
The rapid accumulation of software vulnerabilities has outpaced manual remediation, creating an urgent need for Automated Vulnerability Repair (AVR). However, existing methods suffer from syntactic overfitting, mimicking surface forms without understanding the underlying repair logic, and fail to generalize to complex fixes. To transcend these limitations, we propose SeCuRepair, a reliable, scalable, and efficient RL-based AVR framework. By introducing a semantic-aware reward, SeCuRepair optimizes for code semantic equivalence rather than lexical mimicry. Furthermore, SeCuRepair incorporates an expert-aligned reasoning mechanism that explicitly grounds patch generation in a structured diagnosis. Finally, SeCuRepair introduces a difficulty-based curriculum that progressively disentangles the optimization barriers of entangled multi-hunk repairs. Extensive evaluations on a rigorous repository-level split show that SeCuRepair substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, as confirmed by both automatic evaluation and human study.

Abstract:
Summarizing deeply nested discussion threads requires handling interleaved replies, quotes, and overlapping topics, which standard LLM summarizers struggle to capture reliably. We introduce ThreadSumm , a multi-stage LLM framework that treats thread summarization as a hierarchical reasoning problem over explicit aspect and content unit representations. Our method first performs content planning via LLM-based extraction of discourse aspects and Atomic Content Units, then applies sentence ordering to construct thread-aware sequences that surface multiple viewpoints rather than a single linear strand. On top of these interpretable units, ThreadSumm employs a Tree of Thoughts search that generates and scores multiple paragraph candidates, jointly optimizing coherence and coverage within a unified search space. With this multi-proposal and iterative refinement design, we show improved performance in generating logically structured summaries compared to existing baselines, while achieving higher aspect retention and opinion coverage in nested discussions.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as automated evaluators (LLM-as-a-Judge). This work challenges its reliability by showing that trust judgments by LLMs are biased by disclosed source labels. Using a counterfactual design, we find that both humans and LLM judges assign higher trust to information labeled as human-authored than to the same content labeled as AI-generated. Eye-tracking data reveal that humans rely heavily on source labels as heuristic cues for judgments. We analyze LLM internal states during judgment. Across label conditions, models allocate denser attention to the label region than the content region, and this label dominance is stronger under Human labels than AI labels, consistent with the human gaze patterns. Besides, decision uncertainty measured by logits is higher under AI labels than Human labels. These results indicate that the source label is a salient heuristic cue for both humans and LLMs. It raises validity concerns for label-sensitive LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation, and we cautiously raise that aligning models with human preferences may propagate human heuristic reliance into models, motivating debiased evaluation and alignment.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on general text; however, their proficiency in specialized scientific domains that require deep, interconnected knowledge remains largely uncharacterized. Metabolomics presents unique challenges with its complex biochemical pathways, heterogeneous identifier systems, and fragmented databases. To systematically evaluate LLM capabilities in this domain, we introduce MetaBench, the first benchmark for metabolomics assessment. Curated from authoritative public resources, MetaBench evaluates five capabilities essential for metabolomics research: knowledge , understanding, grounding, reasoning, and research. Our evaluation of 25 open- and closed-source LLMs reveals distinct performance patterns across metabolomics tasks: while models perform well on text generation tasks, cross-database identifier grounding remains challenging even with retrieval augmentation. Model performance also decreases on long-tail metabolites with sparse annotations. With MetaBench, we provide essential infrastructure for developing and evaluating metabolomics AI systems, enabling systematic progress toward reliable computational tools for metabolomics research.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) paradigms have demonstrated strong performance on reasoning-intensive tasks such as code generation. However, limited trajectory diversity often leads to diminishing returns, which constrains the achievable performance ceiling. Search-enhanced RL alleviates this issue by introducing structured exploration, which remains constrained by the single-agent policy priors. Meanwhile, leveraging multiple interacting policies can acquire more diverse exploratory signals, but existing approaches are typically decoupled from structured search. We propose MARS 2 (Multi-Agent Reinforced Tree-Search Scaling), a unified RL framework in which multiple independently-optimized agents collaborate within a shared tree-structured search environment. MARS 2 models the search tree as a learnable multi-agent interaction environment, enabling heterogeneous agents to collaboratively generate and refine candidate solutions within a shared search topology. To support effective learning, we introduce a path-level group advantage formulation based on tree-consistent reward shaping, which facilitates effective credit assignment across complex search trajectories. Experiments on code generation benchmarks show that MARS 2 consistently improves performance across diverse model combinations and training settings, demonstrating the effectiveness of coupling multi-agent collaboration with tree search for enhancing reinforcement learning. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/TsinghuaC3I/MARTI .

Abstract:
Most studies on Arabic Named Entity Recognition (NER) have focused on news texts and social media posts, while the large and rich corpus of literary Arabic books has been underrepresented. We introduce AdabNER, the first large-scale nested NER dataset for Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) literary texts, comprising the first 6,000 words annotated from each of 138 books spanning ten literary genres, including history, biography, literary criticism, and travel literature, and covering works from the 1880s to the 2020s. The corpus comprises about 876K tokens, manually annotated using a nested 21 entity tag annotation scheme, yielding 78,530 entity mentions, 18.96% of which are nested. We fine-tuned five pre-trained Arabic BERT encoders in two settings: stratified and leave-book-out, achieving F1 scores of 0.86 and 0.83 with AraBERTv2, respectively. We also evaluated five large language models through few-shot in-context learning, including open-source models and the closed-source Gemini 3 Pro, with Gemini 3 Pro achieving the highest LLM F1 score of 0.59. Supervised results degraded under out-of-domain evaluation; however, joint multi-domain training reduced this gap to less than a 1% F1 loss, demonstrating that domain-diverse training data is key to robust Arabic NER, though broader validation beyond the experiments reported is needed. AdabNER and its annotation guidelines are publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19468385.

Abstract:
Intelligent dialogue systems are increasingly deployed in emotionally and ethically sensitive settings, where failures in either emotional attunement or ethical judgment can cause significant harm. Existing dialogue models typically address empathy and ethical safety in isolation, and often fail to adapt their behavior as ethical risk and user emotion evolve across multi-turn interactions. We formulate ethical-emotional alignment in dialogue as an explicit turn-level decision problem, and propose EthicMind, a risk-aware framework that implements this formulation in multi-turn dialogue at inference time. At each turn, EthicMind jointly analyzes ethical risk signals and user emotion, plans a high-level response strategy, and generates context-sensitive replies that balance ethical guidance with emotional engagement, without requiring additional model training. To evaluate alignment behavior under ethically complex interactions, we introduce a risk-stratified, multi-turn evaluation protocol with a context-aware user simulation procedure. Experimental results show that EthicMind achieves more consistent ethical guidance and emotional engagement than competitive baselines, particularly in high-risk and morally ambiguous scenarios.

Abstract:
Social media are shifting towards pluralism — community-governed platforms where groups define their own norms. What violates rules in one community may be perfectly acceptable in another. Can AI models help moderate such pluralistic communities? We formalize the task as a multiple-choice problem, mirroring how human moderators operate in the real world: given a comment and its surrounding context, identify which specific rule, if any, is violated. We introduce PluRule, a multimodal, multilingual benchmark for detecting 13,371 rule violations across 1,989 Reddit communities spanning 2,885 rules in 9 languages. Using this benchmark, we show that state-of-the-art vision-language models struggle significantly: even GPT-5.2 with high reasoning performs only slightly better than a trivial baseline. We also find that bigger models and increased context provide marginal gains, and universal rules like civility and self-promotion are easier to detect. Our results show that moderation of pluralistic communities on social media is a fundamental challenge for language models. Our code and benchmark are publicly available.

Abstract:
Knowledge Graph (KG) retrieval is a promising augmentation to address knowledge gaps and hallucinations in LLMs. As KGs in practice are stored in graph databases (e.g., Wikidata, Freebase), accurate retrieval requires translating natural language questions into structured queries (query generation). A key challenge of query generation is Text-to-Cypher, which generates Cypher queries for property graphs (e.g., Neo4j), a paradigm increasingly adopted in industry for their scalable architectures and expressive schemas. However, compared to other query generation tasks such as Text-to-SQL or Text-to-SPARQL, Text-to-Cypher remains underexplored due to scarce public KGs and datasets. Existing datasets are small, domain-limited, and lack diversity, constraining LLM progress. To address this, we introduce CypherSmith, an instruction-tuning dataset over 12 × larger than prior public Text-to-Cypher datasets, spanning diverse domains to better support LLM fine-tuning. Our key distinction lies in fully leveraging open-source LLMs for large-scale synthetic data generation and introducing a novel likelihood-based filtering technique to ensure high-quality Text-to-Cypher data. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CypherSmith, achieving state-of-the-art LLM performance.

Abstract:
Emergency departments (ED) rely on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) to assess patient acuity and prioritize care, a process that is largely driven by clinical triage text. Despite recent progress in automated ESI prediction, two fundamental challenges remain: the scarcity of high-quality triage text data due to privacy and regulatory constraints and the lack of a clinically grounded triage framework capable of explicitly capturing the multidimensional structure of triage reasoning. To address these challenges, we draw inspiration from the clinically grounded SOAP paradigm, in which SOAP refers to Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan and captures four complementary aspects of clinical reasoning. Building on this paradigm, we propose SOAPTriage, a SOAP-guided multi-view clinical text modeling framework for automated ESI prediction. To mitigate data scarcity, SOAPTriage introduces a Clinical Note Augmentation (CNA) module that generates natural-language triage notes from structured ED records, resulting in 15,393 augmented clinical notes derived from a real-world dataset. To incorporate clinical structure, SOAPTriage employs a SOAP-Guided Encoding (SGE) module that models patient conditions from four complementary SOAP perspectives, together with an adaptive SOAP-Aware Aggregation and Inference (SAAI) module that performs multi-view reasoning to infer ESI levels. Extensive experiments show that SOAPTriage consistently outperforms strong prompting-based, multi-agent, and encoder-based baselines, demonstrating the effectiveness of SOAP-guided multi-view clinical text modeling for automated emergency triage.

Abstract:
Word sense disambiguation (WSD) is a foundational task in natural language processing. Recent research has reformulated WSD for large language models (LLMs) as a generative task, where the model produces a definition to convey the intended meaning of an ambiguous word in context.In practice, most existing approaches implement this formulation through straightforward supervised fine-tuning, which tends to prioritize superficial context-to-gloss memorization over true contextual sense discrimination, leading to degraded performance on less frequent senses (LFS), particularly in unseen settings.To address this issue, we propose WSDPO, a training framework for generative WSD with chain-of-thought (CoT) and preference optimization. WSDPO consists of three stages: (1) disambiguation-aware CoT construction, which produces training data containing explicit disambiguation steps for the later stage;(2) disambiguation-guided supervised fine-tuning, which explicitly trains the model to discriminate word sense before generating the final definition; and(3) preference-based optimization, which further strengthens the model’s ability to generate sense-faithful definitions by optimizing it using preference pairs constructed from multiple sampled CoT outputs.Extensive experiments across benchmark datasets and multiple backbone LLMs demonstrate that WSDPO achieves substantial performance gains on rare and unseen settings, and exhibits strong generalization in standard evaluation settings.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents have exhibited strong problem-solving competence across domains like research and coding. Yet, it remains underexplored whether LLM agents can tackle compounding real-world problems that require a diverse set of tools to complete. Given a broad, heterogeneous tool repository, LLM agents must not only select appropriate tools based on task planning analysis but also strategically schedule the execution order to ensure efficiency. This paper introduces TPS-Bench to benchmark the ability of LLM agents in solving such problems that demand Tool Planning and Scheduling. TPS-Bench collects 200 compounding tasks of two difficulty levels, based on a tool repository containing hundreds of model context protocol (MCP) tools. In particular, each task is composed of multiple subtasks, such as web search, map navigation, calendar checking, etc., and each subtask can be completed by a basic tool. Our evaluation emphasizes both task completion rate and efficiency. The empirical studies on popular closed-source and open-source LLMs indicate that most models can perform reasonable tool planning, but differ in scheduling. For example, GLM-4.5 achieves an outperforming task completion rate of 64.72% with extensive sequential tool calls, hence suffering from significantly long execution time. By contrast, GPT-4o prioritizes parallel tool calls but achieves only a 45.08% completion rate. Considering reinforcement learning (RL) can be a viable way to improve the scheduling efficiency without compromising performance, we perform an initial study on Qwen3-1.7B and witness a 14% reduction in execution time alongside a 6% gain in task completion rate based on only 597 RL training samples.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement in large language models (LLMs) has demonstrated significant potential in End-to-End Software Development (E2ESD). However, existing E2ESD benchmarks are limited by coarse-grained requirement specifications and unreliable evaluation protocols, hindering a true understanding of current framework capabilities. To address these limitations, we present E2EDev, a novel benchmark grounded in the principles of Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) to assess whether the generated software meets user needs through mimicking real user interactions. E2EDev comprises (i) a fine-grained set of user requirements for each target software project (ii) multiple BDD test scenarios with corresponding Python step implementations for each requirement, and (iii) a fully automated testing pipeline built on the Behave framework. By evaluating various E2ESD frameworks and LLM backbones with E2EDev, our analysis reveals a persistent struggle to effectively solve these tasks, underscoring the critical need for more effective and cost-efficient E2ESD solutions. Our codebase and benchmark are available at https://github.com/SCUNLP/E2EDev.

Abstract:
Deciphering ancient Chinese Oracle Bone Script (OBS) is a challenging task that offers insights into the beliefs, systems, and culture of the ancient era. Existing approaches treat decipherment as a closed-set image recognition problem, which fails to bridge the “interpretation gap”: while individual characters are often unique and rare, they are composed of a limited set of recurring, pictographic components that carry transferable semantic meanings. To leverage this structural logic, we propose an agent-driven Vision-Language Model (VLM) framework that integrates a VLM for precise visual grounding with an LLM-based agent to automate a reasoning chain of component identification, graph-based knowledge retrieval, and relationship inference for linguistically accurate interpretation. To support this, we also introduce OB-Radix, an expert-annotated dataset providing structural and semantic data absent from prior corpora, comprising 1,022 character images (934 unique characters) and 1,853 fine-grained component images across 478 distinct components with verified explanations. By evaluating our system across three benchmarks of different tasks, we demonstrate that our framework yields more detailed and precise decipherments compared to baseline methods.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is an effective approach to enhancing their performance on specialized downstream tasks. Among the various techniques, low-rank adaptation has garnered significant attention due to its ability to maintain the full performance of fine-tuning while enhancing computational efficiency. However, existing approaches often rely on manually specified and fixed hyperparameters to identify the trainable components within weight matrices, resulting in suboptimal performance and low parameter efficiency. This paper presents a novel Learnable Low-Rank Adaptation (LeLoRA) framework that utilizes dynamically learned fine-tuning strategies to facilitate the effective adaptation of LLMs. Our framework integrates an LLM with a policy network that automatically and adaptively generates matrix-specific adaptation strategies to identify the trainable components of each weight matrix, taking into account their unique characteristics, such as singular values and matrix norms. A reinforcement learning-based optimization algorithm is then employed to iteratively update the LLM and the policy network, ensuring that the generated strategies adapt in real time to the evolving states of the LLM. Extensive experiments have been conducted across various natural language processing and multimodal tasks. The results across ten different LLMs, ranging from 125M to 70B parameters, provide compelling evidence that LeLoRA consistently outperforms existing baselines in adapting LLMs. Moreover, analytical experiments provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the generated strategies.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide range of mathematical benchmarks. However, concerns remain as to whether these successes reflect genuine reasoning or superficial pattern recognition. Existing evaluation methods, which typically focus either on the final answer or on the intermediate reasoning steps, reduce mathematical reasoning to a shallow input–output mapping, overlooking its inherently multi-stage and multi-dimensional cognitive nature. Inspired by P’olya’s problem-solving theory, we propose SMART, a benchmark that decomposes mathematical problem-solving into four cognitive dimensions: Semantic Understanding, Mathematical Reasoning, Arithmetic Computation, and Reflection RefinemenT, and introduces dimension-specific tasks to measure the corresponding cognitive processes of LLMs. We apply SMART to 22 state-of-the-art open- and closed-source LLMs and uncover substantial discrepancies in their capabilities across dimensions. Our findings reveal genuine weaknesses in current models and motivate a new metric, the All-Pass Score, designed to better capture true problem-solving capability.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as conversational assistants in genomics, where they are mainly used to reason over biological knowledge, annotations, and analysis outputs through natural language interfaces. However, existing benchmarks either focus on specialized DNA models trained for sequence prediction or evaluate biological knowledge using text-only questions, leaving the behavior of general-purpose LLMs when directly exposed to raw genome sequences underexplored. We introduce GenomeQA, a benchmark designed to provide a controlled evaluation setting for general-purpose LLMs on sequence-based genome inference tasks. GenomeQA comprises 5,200 samples drawn from multiple biological databases, with sequence lengths ranging from 6 to 1,000 base pairs (bp), spanning six task families: Enhancer and Promoter Identification, Splice Site Identification, Taxonomic Classification, Histone Mark Prediction, Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction, and TF Motif Prediction. Across six frontier LLMs, we find that models often outperform random baselines, particularly on tasks driven by local sequence cues such as GC content and short motifs, while performance degrades on tasks that require more indirect or multi-step inference over sequence patterns. GenomeQA establishes a diagnostic benchmark for studying and improving the use of general-purpose LLMs on raw genomic sequences.

Abstract:
Scaling multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to long videos is constrained by limited context windows. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a promising remedy by organizing query-relevant visual evidence into a compact context, most existing methods (i) flatten videos into independent segments, breaking their inherent spatio-temporal structure, and (ii) depend on explicit semantic matching, which can miss cues that are implicitly relevant to the query’s intent. To overcome these limitations, we propose VideoStir, a structured and intent-aware long-video RAG framework. It firstly structures a video as a spatio-temporal graph at clip level, and then performs multi-hop retrieval to aggregate evidence across distant yet contextually related events. Furthermore, it introduces an MLLM-backed intent-relevance scorer that retrieves frames based on their alignment with the query’s reasoning intent. To support this capability, we curate IR-600K, a large-scale dataset tailored for learning frame–query intent alignment. Experiments show that VideoStir is competitive with state-of-the-art baselines without relying on auxiliary information, highlighting the promise of shifting long-video RAG from flattened semantic matching to structured, intent-aware reasoning. Codes and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/RomGai/VideoStir.

Abstract:
Accurate Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is critical for reliable deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet traditional probability-based metrics often fail to capture the model’s true epistemic state. While recent mechanistic approaches leverage hidden state dynamics, they typically aggregate residual stream updates, conflating the distinct roles of parametric memory (Feed-Forward Networks) and contextual processing (Attention). We argue that this aggregation obscures fine-grained mechanistic conflicts, such as memory-context misalignment, that are fundamental indicators of uncertainty. To address this, we introduce Decoupled Update Dynamics (DUD), a framework that explicitly decouples FFN and Attention contributions via noise-induced causal interventions. By quantifying the independent restoration capabilities of each module, we construct a dual-stream dynamic profile that captures the model’s internal fragility. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DUD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both uncertainty estimation and calibration, while exhibiting superior cross-dataset generalization, validating decoupled dynamics as a robust proxy for model faithfulness.

Abstract:
Dense retrieval in multilingual settings often searches over mixed-language collections, yet multilingual embeddings encode language identity alongside semantics. This language signal can inflate similarity for same-language pairs and crowd out relevant evidence written in other languages. We propose LANGSAE EDITING, a post-hoc sparse autoencoder trained on pooled embeddings that enables controllable removal of language-identity signal directly in vector space. The method identifies language-associated latent units using cross-language activation statistics, suppresses these units at inference time, and reconstructs embeddings in the original dimensionality, making it compatible with existing vector databases without retraining the base encoder or re-encoding raw text. Experiments across multiple languages show consistent improvements in ranking quality and cross-language coverage, with especially strong gains for script-distinct languages.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often encode whether a statement is true as a vector in their residual stream activations. These vectors, also known as truth vectors, have been studied in prior work, however how they change when context is introduced remains unexplored. We study this question by measuring (1) the directional change ( 𝜃 ) between the truth vectors with and without context and (2) the relative magnitude of the truth vectors upon adding context. Across four LLMs and four datasets, we find that (1) truth vectors are roughly orthogonal in early layers, converge in middle layers, and may stabilize or continue increasing in later layers; (2) adding context generally increases the truth vector magnitude, i.e., the separation between true and false representations in the activation space is amplified; (3) larger models distinguish relevant from irrelevant context mainly through directional change ( 𝜃 ), while smaller models show this distinction through magnitude differences. We also find that context conflicting with parametric knowledge produces larger geometric changes than parametrically aligned context. Collectively, these findings provide a geometric characterization of how context transforms the truth vector in the activation space of LLMs.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, aligning these models with human preferences has emerged as a critical challenge. Traditional alignment methods, relying on human or LLM annotated datasets, are limited by their resource-intensive nature, inherent subjectivity, misalignment with real-world user preferences, and the risk of feedback loops that amplify model biases. To overcome these limitations, we introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages in-situ user feedback during conversations with LLMs to create preference datasets automatically. Given a corpus of multi-turn user-LLM conversation, WildFeedback identifies and classifies user feedback to LLM responses between conversation turns. The user feedback is then used to create examples of preferred and dispreferred responses according to users’ preference. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback dataset exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences, as evidenced by both traditional benchmarks and our proposed checklist-guided evaluation. By incorporating in-situ feedback from actual users, WildFeedback addresses the scalability, subjectivity, and bias challenges that plague existing approaches, marking a significant step toward developing LLMs that are more responsive to the diverse and evolving needs of their users.

Abstract:
As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) acquire stronger reasoning capabilities to handle complex, multi-image instructions, this advancement may pose new safety risks. We study this problem by introducing MIR-SafetyBench, the first benchmark focused on multi-image reasoning safety, which consists of 2,676 instances across a taxonomy of 9 multi-image relations. Our extensive evaluations on 19 MLLMs reveal a troubling trend: models with more advanced multi-image reasoning can be more vulnerable on MIR-SafetyBench. Beyond attack success rates, we find that many responses labeled as safe are superficial, often driven by misunderstanding or evasive, non-committal replies. We further observe that unsafe generations exhibit lower attention entropy than safe ones on average. This internal signature suggests a possible risk that models may over-focus on task solving while neglecting safety constraints.

Abstract:
The linear growth of KV cache bottlenecks long-context LLMs, yet RoPE-induced oscillations complicate Key cache quantization. To address this issue, we propose SpectrumQuant, a frequency-domain framework that utilizes the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to convert these oscillations into sparse spectral representations. Specifically, our pipeline integrates dominant frequency extraction, hybrid bit-width allocation, and high-frequency pre-emphasis to maximize fidelity while minimizing memory footprint. To eliminate computational overhead, we develop fused Triton kernels featuring deferred inverse transformation and on-chip sparse accumulation. Extensive experiments on several benchmarks confirm SpectrumQuant achieves efficient compression with performance and latency comparable to FP16 baselines.

Abstract:
Despite rapid progress in building conversational AI agents, robustness is still largely untested. Small shifts in user behavior, such as being more impatient, incoherent, or skeptical, can cause sharp drops in agent performance, revealing how brittle current AI agents are. Today’s benchmarks fail to capture this fragility: agents may perform well under standard evaluations but degrade spectacularly in more realistic and varied settings. We address this robustness testing gap by introducing TraitBasis, a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents. TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits (e.g., impatience or incoherence), which can be controlled, scaled, composed, and applied at inference time without any fine-tuning or extra data. Using TraitBasis, we extend τ-Bench to τ-bench, where user behaviors are altered via controlled trait vectors. We observe an average 4%–20% performance degradation on τ-bench across frontier models, highlighting the lack of robustness of current AI agents to variations in user behavior. Together, these results highlight both the critical role of robustness testing and the promise of TraitBasis as a simple, data-efficient, and compositional tool. By powering simulation-driven stress tests and training loops, TraitBasis opens the door to building AI agents that remain reliable in the unpredictable dynamics of real-world human interactions. We plan to open-source τ-bench, across four domains: airline, retail, telecom, and telehealth, so the community can systematically QA their agents under realistic, behaviorally diverse intents and trait scenarios.

Abstract:
WebAgents have demonstrated strong capabilities in autonomously completing complex web tasks, yet their computational efficiency vulnerabilities have received limited attention. Adversaries can inject malicious prompts into web pages, causing WebAgents to generate unnecessarily long reasoning processes and incur excessive computational cost, termed Computational Cost Attacks (CCA). In this paper, to systematically study this vulnerability under realistic black-box settings, we propose CostBomb, a generation-then-selection attack framework that leverages large language models to generate diverse adversarial prompts and a reinforcement learning–enhanced selector to identify the most effective perturbations. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world web benchmarks reveal that existing WebAgents are highly vulnerable to CCA, suffering substantial increases in computational cost without compromising successful task completion. Our findings highlight an overlooked dimension of WebAgent robustness and underscore the urgent need for efficiency-aware defenses.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and generation, serving as the foundation for advanced persona simulation and Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs). However, achieving authentic alignment with human cognitive and behavioral patterns remains a critical challenge for these agents. We present HumanLLM, a framework treating psychological patterns as interacting causal forces.We construct 244 patterns from ∼ 12,000 academic papers and synthesize 11,359 scenarios where 2-5 patterns reinforce, conflict, or modulate each other, with multi-turn conversations expressing inner thoughts, actions, and dialogue.Our dual-level checklists evaluate both individual pattern fidelity and emergent multi-pattern dynamics, achieving strong human alignment ( r=0.90 ) while revealing that holistic metrics conflate simulation accuracy with social desirability.HumanLLM-8B outperforms Qwen3-32B on multi-pattern dynamics despite 4 × fewer parameters, demonstrating that authentic anthropomorphism requires cognitive modeling—simulating not just what humans do, but the psychological processes generating those behaviors.Our dataset, code, and model are available at:https://github.com/YJGoodbye2024/HumanLLM

Abstract:
AI models capable of comprehending humor hold real-world promise—for example, enhancing engagement in human-machine interactions. To gauge and diagnose the capacity of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for humor understanding, we introduce v-HUB, a novel video humor understanding benchmark. v-HUB comprises a curated collection of non-verbal short videos, reflecting real-world scenarios where humor can be appreciated purely through visual cues. We pair each video clip with rich annotations to support a variety of evaluation tasks and analyses, including a novel study of environmental sound that can enhance humor. To broaden its applicability, we construct an open-ended QA task, making v-HUB readily integrable into existing video understanding task suites. We evaluate a diverse set of MLLMs, from specialized Video-LLMs to versatile OmniLLMs that can natively process audio, covering both open-source and proprietary domains. The experimental results expose the difficulties MLLMs face in comprehending humor from visual cues alone. Our findings also demonstrate that incorporating audio helps with video humor understanding, highlighting the promise of integrating richer modalities for complex video understanding tasks.

Abstract:
Adaptive retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models offer an effective approach for integrating external knowledge. However, existing methods either rely on frozen large language models (LLMs) without explicit supervision or require costly LLM finetuning. Therefore, we propose SPARKLE, a structured and plug-and-play agentic retrieval policy where an additional proxy model is introduced to control the retrieval process. The proxy model leverages knowledge graph-based reasoning to make retrieval decisions in a structured manner, while operating independently of the retriever and the LLM. This plug-and-play design allows SPARKLE to generalise across different retrievers and LLMs. SPARKLE is optimised via reinforcement learning (RL), treating the retriever and the LLM as part of the environment. To enable more effective exploration during RL training, we further introduce a binary tree-structured rollout strategy. Experiments on three in-domain and four out-of-domain QA benchmarks show that SPARKLE outperforms state-of-the-art adaptive RAG baselines, achieving average improvements of 9.17% and 2.85%, respectively.

Abstract:
Idioms are difficult to transfer across languages due to their non-compositionality and weak surface-form grounding, making literal mappings unreliable. We present G-IdiomAlign, a gloss-pivoted benchmark where each idiom is anchored by an English gloss from Wiktionary. We further construct a high-confidence reference alignment set for reproducible evaluation. G-IdiomAlign supports two protocols: (1) a controlled Multiple-Choice Idiom Equivalence with typed distractors for error attribution; and (2) a Gloss-Contrastive Generation contrasting No-gloss and With-gloss inputs to isolate the effect of an explicit semantic pivot. Across diverse LLMs, a bias to literal translation is a dominant failure mode, especially when the target is a low-resource language. Glosses consistently improve Gloss-Contrastive Generation under an embedding-based semantic proxy, but performance remains modest, indicating substantial headroom in the open output space. Subsequent analysis on Qwen3-8B further suggests that cross-condition differences are concentrated more in attention heads than in layers, while better With-gloss generations coincide with stronger gloss anchoring.

Abstract:
As applications of large language models (LLMs) become increasingly complex, the demand for robust complex instruction following capabilities is growing accordingly. We argue that a thorough understanding of the instruction itself, especially the latent reasoning structure embedded between the lines, is crucial for improving instruction following. Therefore we target complex instructions that involve implicit reasoning, intricate logical relations, and multi-constraint dependencies. We propose ImpRIF, a method to enhance LLMs’ understanding of implicit reasoning instructions, thereby improving its ability to follow complex instructions. We formalize such instructions as verifiable reasoning graphs, enabling programmatic verification and graph-driven chain-of-thought reasoning. Based on this formulation, we synthesize large-scale single- and multi-turn data, propose fine-tuning with graph reasoning, and apply reinforcement learning to explicitly train models to reason along the graph. On five complex instruction following benchmarks, our models substantially outperform their base models. These results demonstrate that enhancing implicit reasoning capabilities can significantly improve complex instruction following. This project will be open-sourced in the near future.

Abstract:
Emotion Recognition in Conversation (ERC), the task of identifying the emotion of each utterance in a conversation, is crucial for human-machine interaction. Existing LLM-based ERC methods focus on standard prompting and slow thinking for emotion analysis. However, they suffer from the lack of human-like emotion reasoning and discrimination between similar emotions, thus limiting accurate emotion predictions. To this end, we present JoPR, jointing perception-curriculum learning and emotional reasoning for conversational emotion recognition. Specifically, we devise a multi-dimension curriculum with long CoT fine-tuning to clone human-like emotion reasoning. We further design an emotion-specific reward function in a novel reinforcement learning framework, thereby enhancing the discernment between similar emotions. Our proposal is extensively evaluated over three widely used benchmark datasets, and experimental results confirm the superiority of JoPR. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth analysis to confirm the emotion perception and reasoning capabilities of JoPR.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to utilize their latent reasoning capabilities due to a distributional mismatch between ambiguous human inquiries and the structured logic required for machine activation. Existing alignment methods either incur prohibitive O(N) costs by fine-tuning each model individually or rely on static prompts that fail to resolve query-level structural complexity. In this paper, we propose ReQueR (Reinforcement Query Refinement), a modular framework that treats reasoning elicitation as an inference-time alignment task. We train a specialized Refiner policy via Reinforcement Learning to rewrite raw queries into explicit logical decompositions, treating frozen LLMs as the environment. Rooted in the classical Zone of Proximal Development from educational psychology, we introduce the Adaptive Solver Hierarchy, a curriculum mechanism that stabilizes training by dynamically aligning environmental difficulty with the Refiner’s evolving competence. ReQueR yields consistent absolute gains of 1.3%–7.2% across diverse architectures and benchmarks, outperforming strong baselines by 2.1% on average. Crucially, it provides a promising paradigm for one-to-many inference-time reasoning elicitation, enabling a single Refiner trained on a small set of models to effectively unlock reasoning in diverse unseen Solvers. Code is available at https://github.com/newera-xiao/ReQueR.

Abstract:
Recent developments have enabled advanced reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) via long Chain-of-Thought (CoT), trading efficiency during inference for performance. Existing works focus on compressing generated CoT in reasoning, which impairs the necessary information for deriving the correct answer. In this work, we propose post-reasoning, a reasoning paradigm that takes CoT as a part of context to simplify the reasoning task for LLMs. We find that post-reasoning significantly reduces the generation length of LLMs, but its effectiveness hinges on the efficiency and the reliability of the contextual CoT generation.Therefore, we propose Upfront CoT (UCoT), an efficient post-reasoning framework for CoT compression. UCoT trains a lightweight model (compressor) to provide contextual CoT in form of soft tokens and trains the LLM (executor) to leverage this contextual CoT for producing the final answer. Extensive experiments show that UCoT maintains the powerful reasoning ability of executor while significantly reducing the length of CoT. It is worth mentioning that when applying UCoT to the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model, the usage of tokens on GSM8K dataset is reduced by 50%, while the performance is 3.08% higher than that of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) method. The code is available at: https://github.com/czx-li/UCoT.

Abstract:
In the context of today’s high-pressure, aging society, the demand for large-scale emotional models capable of providing empathetic support is more critical than ever. However, existing benchmarks fail to simultaneously achieve ecological validity, signal clarity, and reliable fine-grained labeling. We introduce EmoS, a high-fidelity bilingual benchmark designed to resolve the limitations of ecological validity and noise in existing datasets by combining strictly filtered static slices with a dynamic Streaming Monologue subset. Supported by a rigorous dual-layer human annotation pipeline, EmoS provides trusted ground truth that captures continuous emotional evolution. Empirical results show that fine-tuning MLLMs (multimodal large language models) on EmoS yields significant gains over zero-shot baselines, laying the foundation for the training and evaluation of future emotion recognition models and empathy models. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/NLP2CT/EmoS.

Abstract:
The increasing use of video data in training multimodal large language models (MLLMs) raises significant concerns on privacy leakage and copyright violations, highlighting the need for detecting improperly used training videos through membership inference attacks (MIAs). Most existing video MIA methods assess model memorization of key semantic concepts within a video (e.g., the name of a well-known movie character). However, such concepts usually appear repeatedly throughout the training corpus, and memorization of them does not constitute reliable evidence that a specific video was used during training. Besides, while some methods mitigate this limitation by capturing relationships between frames, they require a model logit-accessible setting and are impractical in realistic black-box scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose a black-box MIA framework, named VideoMIA, that can provide reliable evidence of specific video data usage for training MLLMs. The key of our method is to leverage temporal dependencies across video frames to evaluate the model’s memorization of sequential dynamics within the video data, which cannot be inferred solely from general world knowledge or individual image data. The results across ten MLLMs and four benchmarks demonstrate that our method consistently achieves superior performance over all baselines in black-box evaluation settings. Code is available in https://github.com/jinruiwang258/VideoMIA.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are largely static and often redo reasoning or repeat mistakes. Prior experience reuse typically relies on external retrieval, which is similarity-based, can introduce noise, and adds latency. We introduce SEAM ( S tructured E xperience A dapter M odule), a lightweight, executor-specific plug-in that stores experience in its parameters and generates a structured, instance-tailored experience entry in a single forward pass to guide a frozen LLM executor. SEAM is trained for utility via executor rollouts and GRPO while keeping the executor frozen, and can be further improved with logged-success SFT after deployment. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show consistent accuracy gains across executors with low overhead. Extensive ablation and analysis further elucidate the mechanisms underlying SEAM’s effectiveness and robustness.[We release our code at .]

Abstract:
Causal reasoning in natural language requires identifying relevant variables, understanding their interactions, and reasoning about effects and interventions, often under noisy or ambiguous conditions. While large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general reasoning abilities, they struggle to disentangle correlation from causation, particularly when observations are partially incorrect or irrelevant information is present. In this work, we introduce NoisyCausal, a new benchmark designed to evaluate causal reasoning under structured noise. Each instance is generated from a ground-truth causal graph and contextualized with a natural language scenario by injecting controllable forms of noise, such as irrelevant distractors, value perturbations, confounding, and partial observability. Moreover, we propose a modular reasoning framework that combines LLMs with explicit causal structure to address these challenges. Our method prompts the LLM to extract variables, construct a causal graph from context, and then reformulates the reasoning task as a structured prompt grounded in this graph. Rather than relying on statistical patterns alone, the LLM is guided by symbolic structure, enabling more interpretable and robust inference. Experimental results show that our method significantly outperforms standard prompting and reasoning baselines on NoisyCausal. Furthermore, it generalizes well to external benchmarks such as Cladder without task-specific tuning. Our findings highlight the importance of combining causal abstractions with language-driven reasoning to achieve faithful and robust causal understanding in LLMs.

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) are the surrogate objectives in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), and their scores directly steer policy optimization. We show that standard RM training is vulnerable in data subsets where response quality depends only weakly on the context: such instances encourage the RM to ignore the context, leading to context neglect and degraded accuracy. To address this failure mode, we propose Distribution-Aware Reward Modeling (DARM), which augments the RM objective with a conditional mutual information regularizer that maximizes context and the predicted reward conditioned on the response. By explicitly preserving the sensitivity of reward signals to the prompting context, DARM reduces over-reliance on response-only features and improves robustness to contextual variation. Extensive experiments across in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings show that DARM trained RMs deliver more accurate and consistent scoring than strong baselines. We further evaluate its downstream impact in RLHF, where DARM produce better aligned policies. We also demonstrate the necessity of each DARM design component and the impact of key parameters on performance through ablation experiments.

Abstract:
Optimizing the trade-off among predictive performance and computational cost is a central focus in the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs). Current routing methods primarily rely on direct mapping from queries to models based on surface-level features, making them susceptible to the memorization trap and leading to poor generalizability on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper, we propose DecoR, a novel routing framework that recasts the routing task as a matching process of sifting similar queries from historical logs, effectively mitigating the memorization trap. To enhance matching accuracy, we introduce a query capability deconstruction method that decouples linguistic surface forms from task-intrinsic requirements, directing matching toward capability dimensions to ground decisions in essential task attributes. Furthermore, we develop CodaSet, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing routing generalization, where experimental results demonstrate that DecoR maintains superior accuracy while substantially lowering inference costs across both in-distribution and OOD settings.

Abstract:
To reliably interpret the evolving context of an LLM as a reasoning trace, the underlying belief of the LLM needs to transition consistently with the progression of the context.We focus on evaluating whether the beliefs held by a model remain consistent before and after the extension of the context.Previous research on consistency evaluation typically uses datasets with ground-truth answers, which is problematic because task-solving ability acts as a confounding factor, obscuring the direct evaluation of consistency.Furthermore, evaluating cases where inconsistency stems from multiple errors poses difficulties.We propose a new evaluation method to assess the consistency of LLMs in a multiple-choice question answering format, designed so that any option chosen is correct, allowing for the evaluation of the proposed belief consistency.It also supports isolation of errors such as reasoning failures and biases.We reveal that the belief consistency does not improve solely with model size scaling,whereas continual pre-training on code and mathematics text improves it.Furthermore, models trained on code and mathematics text show a seemingly contradictory result of increased logical failures, indicating that belief consistency and superficial consistency are not necessarily directly linked.

Abstract:
Health influencers play a growing role in shaping public beliefs, yet their content is often conveyed through conversational narratives and rhetorical strategies rather than explicit factual claims. As a result, claim-centric verification methods struggle to capture the pragmatic meaning of influencer discourse. In this paper, we propose TAIGR (Takeaway Argumentation Inference with Grounded References), a structured framework designed to analyze influencer discourse, which operates in 3 stages: (1) identifying the core influencer recommendation–takeaway; (2) constructing an argumentation graph that captures influencer justification for the takeaway; (3) performing factor graph-based probabilistic inference to validate the takeaway. We evaluate TAIGR on a content validation task over influencer video transcripts on health, showing that accurate validation requires modeling the discourse’s pragmatic and argumentative structure rather than treating transcripts as flat collections of claims.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can call tools effectively, yet they remain brittle in multi-turn execution: after a tool-call error, smaller models often fall into repetitive invalid re-invocations instead of interpreting the feedback and recovering. This failure mode persists because current training paradigms do not explicitly teach models how to recover from execution errors. In particular, standard reinforcement learning (RL) collapses rich failure experience into sparse negative rewards, while pre-collected error-correction datasets become mismatched to the policy’s evolving failure modes. To bridge this gap, we propose Fission-GRPO, a framework that converts execution errors into on-policy corrective supervision within the RL training loop. Our core mechanism fissions each failed trajectory into a new training instance by augmenting it with diagnostic feedback from a fine-tuned Error Simulator, then resampling multiple recovery rollouts on-policy. This enables the model to learn from the precise errors it makes during exploration, rather than from static, pre-collected error cases. On BFCL v4 Multi-Turn, Fission-GRPO improves the error recovery rate of Qwen3-8B by 5.7% absolute and overall accuracy by 4.0% (from 42.75% to 46.75%), outperforming both RL baselines and specialized tool-use agents. The method further generalizes to TAU-Bench and TAU2-Bench, achieving leading results across most settings with gains up to +17.4%.

Abstract:
Existing benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents focus on task completion under idealistic settings but overlook reliability in real-world, user-facing applications. In domains, such as in-car voice assistants, users often issue incomplete or ambiguous requests, creating intrinsic uncertainty that agents must manage through dialogue, tool use, and policy adherence. We introduce CAR-bench, a benchmark for evaluating consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain. The environment features an LLM-simulated user, domain policies, and 58 interconnected tools spanning navigation, productivity, charging, and vehicle control. Beyond standard task completion, CAR-bench introduces Hallucination tasks that test agents’ limit-awareness under missing tools or information, and Disambiguation tasks that require resolving uncertainty through clarification or internal information gathering. Baseline results reveal large gaps between occasional and consistent success on all task types. Even frontier reasoning LLMs achieve less than 50% pass rate on Disambiguation tasks due to premature actions, and frequently violate policies or fabricate information to satisfy user requests in Hallucination tasks, underscoring the need for more reliable and self-aware LLM agents in real-world settings.

Abstract:
Visual scale recognition is a fundamental aspect for humans to perceive physical quantities in the real world, and it is crucial for enabling human-like intelligence in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing benchmarks typically focus on a single type of quantity (e.g., time) or a specific format (e.g., dials), lacking a comprehensive evaluation of scale recognition capabilities. To address these problems, we propose ScaleBench, a visual scale recognition benchmark built using images from COCO, Open Images, and Flickr, designed to comprehensively evaluate the scale recognition capabilities of MLLMs. To ensure high data quality, we develop detailed annotation guidelines and procedures, resulting in a total of 6,574 annotated samples. Based on this benchmark, we evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source MLLMs. Experimental results reveal that the best-performing model achieves only 42.60% accuracy, far lower than the 97.40% of humans. Furthermore, we conduct in-depth experimental analyses and provide future research directions. Our benchmark and implementation codes are available at https://github.com/Sonder-hang/ScaleBench.

Abstract:
Multimodal sentiment analysis is fundamentally challenged by semantic incongruence, where ambiguous visual signals often conflict with explicit textual cues. In semi-supervised scenarios, naively fusing such noisy features contaminates the joint representation, while conventional static alignment strategies fail to effectively arbitrate conflicting modalities in this task, leading to error reinforcement during self-training. To this end, we propose a novel Adaptive Arbitration for Semantic Incongruence (A2SI) framework for semi-supervised multimodal sentiment analysis, which emphasizes stable cross-modal representations and reliable supervision. Specifically, we first constrain unreliable visual representations by leveraging the reliable textual modality as an anchor to align divergent embeddings and reduce representation noise. Based on this, we further consider the reliability of supervision signals and calibrate pseudo-labels by adaptively weighting evidentiary confidence from heterogeneous views. Finally, to prevent error accumulation caused by unreliable samples, we introduce a progressive arbitration mechanism that verifies pseudo-labeled data from dual perspectives, enabling the model to dynamically balance sample diversity and label purity throughout self-training. Extensive experiments on the MVSA-Single and MVSA-Multiple datasets demonstrate that A2SI consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods under label-limited settings.

Abstract:
Sign languages are expressive visual languages used by Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) communities. Despite substantial progress in sign-language recognition, translation, and production, advances remain constrained by fragmented datasets, inconsistent annotations, and limited linguistic coverage. Existing benchmarks often fail to reflect real-world communication needs, and systematic analyses of these limitations remain limited. In this survey, we present a comprehensive index of sign-language datasets, covering 120 resources across 35 sign languages. We analyze key challenges such as modality imbalance, annotation granularity, and signer bias, and outline considerations for future dataset design. We also introduce a 24-field Sign-Language Datasheet and release a public GitHub repository to support standardized documentation and reproducible evaluation. Overall, our work provides a unified and practical foundation for developing inclusive, robust, and scalable sign-language technologies in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Dominant multimodal emotion recognition paradigms often neglect the intrinsic geometric structure of affect, resulting in representations heavily entangled with non-affective factors. To address this, we propose a Canonical Disentangled Multimodal Generative Framework aimed at recovering the canonical affective manifold from raw data. We explicitly decompose the latent space into a canonical Shared Affective Subspace ( z vad ) and a Private Modality Subspace ( z priv ). We facilitate this factorization through Supervised Manifold Anchoring and Cross-Modal Manifold Alignment. Experiments demonstrate that our model effectively disentangles affect from private attributes (e.g., identity), achieving superior robustness in zero-shot cross-domain transfer compared to fully supervised baselines, while enabling controllable emotion generation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) operate in two fundamental learning modes – fine-tuning (FT) and in-context learning (ICL) – raising key questions about which mode yields greater language proficiency and whether they differ in their inductive biases. Prior studies comparing FT and ICL have yielded mixed and inconclusive results due to inconsistent experimental setups. To enable a rigorous comparison, we propose a formal language learning task – offering precise language boundaries, controlled string sampling, and no data contamination – and introduce a discriminative test for language proficiency, where an LLM succeeds if it assigns higher generation probability to in-language strings than to out-of-language strings.Empirically, we find that: (a) FT has greater language proficiency than ICL on in-distribution generalization, but both perform equally well on out-of-distribution generalization. (b) Their inductive biases, measured by the correlation in string generation probabilities, are similar when both modes partially learn the language but diverge at higher proficiency levels. (c) Unlike FT, ICL performance differs substantially across models of varying sizes and families and is sensitive to the token vocabulary of the language. Thus, our work demonstrates the promise of formal languages as a controlled testbed for evaluating LLMs, behaviors that are difficult to isolate in natural language datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/bishwamittra/formallm.

Abstract:
Large language models often display heterogeneous moral preferences across settings. We study inference-time steering toward a desired ethical framework while preserving general competence. We present Convergent-Divergent Routing, which traces and edits minimal branch points inside transformer blocks where ethical-framework-related pathways first converge and then diverge. Gating non-target branches at these loci blocks the downstream propagation while leaving upstream computations intact. We find that this intervention alone increases targeted ethical-framework reasoning. To achieve fine-grained control, we adapt Common Spatial Patterns to the residual stream and extract, for each branch-point layer, a pair of directions that discriminate between utilitarian and deontological frameworks. We then introduce Dual Logit Calibration, a closed-form, minimum- ℓ 2 -norm update that moves the residual within this two-dimensional subspace so the resulting directional projections align with user-specified preference weights. Experiments on real-life moral dilemmas show that our method reliably achieves preference calibration and largely preserves general capabilities, outperforming recent baselines while providing an interpretable mechanism.

Abstract:
Behavior trees provide a transparent and modular structure for encoding expert-designed policies, enabling interpretable decision-making in complex tasks. Yet, applying behavior trees to high-dimensional perceptual inputs such as images or language is challenging as defining symbolic predicates over raw perceptual data is non-trivial. While state-of-the-art large multimodal models (such as vision-language models) can overcome this issue by utilizing natural language queries over perceptual inputs, they incur high computational cost, making them unsuitable for many applications. Imitation learning offers a way to distill these expert models into compact models, though it requires extensive supervision. In contrast, reinforcement learning reduces the need for costly supervision but risks misalignment of condition nodes with their intended semantics as well as poor credit assignment. To address these challenges, we introduce CERL (Condition-node Expert-regularized Reinforcement Learning), a framework that leverages expert-regularized reinforcement learning to preserve semantic faithfulness, while employing a factorized policy that aggregates sequential condition-node decisions into a single decision unit to alleviate credit assignment challenges. Experiments across seven tasks from the GymCards, FrozenLake, and BabyAIText suites demonstrate that our framework outperforms pure imitation learning or reinforcement learning baselines, retains strong agreement with expert decisions, and achieves substantial gains in inference speed and model size over expert models. Our implementation is available in https://github.com/HyosikMoon/CERL.

Abstract:
We present TagSpeech, a unified LLM-based framework that utilizes Temporal Anchor Grounding for joint multi-speaker ASR and diarization. The framework is built on two key designs: (1) decoupled semantic and speaker streams fine-tuned via Serialized Output Training (SOT) to learn turn-taking dynamics; and (2) an interleaved time anchor mechanism that not only supports fine-grained timestamp prediction but also acts as a synchronization signal between semantic understanding and speaker tracking. Compared to previous works that primarily focus on speaker-attributed ASR or implicit diarization, TagSpeech addresses the challenge of fine-grained speaker-content alignment and explicitly models who spoke what and when in an end-to-end manner. Experiments on AMI and AliMeeting benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves consistent improvements in Diarization Error Rate (DER) over strong end-to-end baselines, including Qwen-Omni and Gemini, particularly in handling complex speech overlaps. Moreover, TagSpeech employs a parameter-efficient training paradigm in which the LLM backbone is frozen and only lightweight projectors are trained, resulting in strong performance with low computational cost

Abstract:
LLMs operating in dynamic real-world contexts often encounter knowledge that evolves continuously or emerges incrementally. To remain accurate and effective, models must adapt to newly arriving information on the fly. We introduce Online Adaptation to Continual Knowledge Streams(OAKS) to evaluate this capability, establishing a benchmark for online adaptation over streaming, continually updating knowledge. Specifically, the benchmark is structured as a sequence of fine-grained context chunks where facts change dynamically across time intervals. OAKS comprises two datasets: OAKS-BABI and OAKS-Novel, where individual facts evolve multiple times across context chunks. These datasets include dense annotations to measure whether models track changes accurately. Evaluating 14 models with varied inference approaches, we observe significant limitations in current methodologies. Both state-of-the-art models and agentic memory systems fail to adapt robustly on OAKS, demonstrating delays in state-tracking and susceptibility to distraction within streaming environments. We will open-source the code and datasets.

Abstract:
Climate decision-making in the GCC states increasingly demands systems that can translate heterogeneous scientific and policy evidence into actionable guidance, yet general-purpose large language models (LLMs) remain weak both in region-specific climate knowledge and grounded interaction with geospatial and forecasting tools. We present the GCA framework, which unifies (i) GCA-DS, a curated multimodal dataset grounded in the GCC states, and (ii) Gulf Climate Agent (GCA), a tool-augmented agent for climate analysis. GCA-DS comprises nearly 200k question-answer pairs spanning governmental policies and adaptation plans, NGO and international frameworks, academic literature, and event-driven reporting on heatwaves, dust storms, and floods, complemented with remote-sensing inputs that couple imagery with textual evidence. Building on this foundation, the GCA agent orchestrates a modular tool pipeline grounded in real-time and historical signals and geospatial processing that produces derived indices and interpretable visualizations. Finally, we benchmark open and proprietary LLMs on climate tasks in the GCC states and show that domain fine-tuning and tool integration substantially improve reliability over general-purpose baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong multilingual capabilities, yet often fail to consistently generate responses in the intended language, exhibiting a phenomenon known as language confusion.Prior mitigation approaches based on sequence-level fine-tuning, such as DPO, ORPO, and GRPO, operate at the level of entire responses and can lead to unintended degradation of general model capabilities, motivating the need for more fine-grained alternatives.To address this, we introduce Token-Level Policy Optimization (TLPO), a fine-tuning framework designed to mitigate language confusion through localized, token-level updates. TLPO identifies error-prone positions, explores alternative candidate tokens, and updates the policy using a tailored objective to suppress error-inducing outputs at a granular level.This selective intervention enables effective mitigation of language confusion without compromising the model’s general abilities.Experiments on multiple multilingual LLMs across diverse languages demonstrate that TLPO significantly outperforms baselines in improving language consistency while preserving downstream task accuracy.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards is ideal for multi-constraint instruction following, yet standard group-relative policy optimization (GRPO) becomes unstable under discrete, low-dispersion rewards, where within-group reward distributions are frequently homogeneous. We identify and formalize three pathologies of z-score group normalization in this regime: low-variance amplification, mean-centering blindness, and zero-variance collapse. To address them, we propose MDP-GRPO, which stabilizes learning through (1) multi-temperature sampling to increase reward dispersion, (2) dual-anchor advantages to restore gradients in homogeneous groups, (3) prospect-theoretic shaping to bound updates and penalize violations based on Kahneman Tversky’s theory, and (4) asymmetric KL regularization. Evaluated on FollowBench, IFEval, and a curated multi-constraint dataset, MDP-GRPO outperforms standard GRPO, improving strict constraint satisfaction by up to 5.0% on Llama-3.2-3B. Our method also enables stable convergence with small group sizes while preserving general capabilities on MMLU and ARC.

Abstract:
This paper presents AutoRAN, the first framework to automate the hijacking of internal safety reasoning in large reasoning models (LRMs). At its core, AutoRAN pioneers an execution simulation paradigm that leverages a weaker but less-aligned model to simulate execution reasoning for initial hijacking attempts and iteratively refine attacks by exploiting reasoning patterns leaked through the target LRM’s refusals. This approach steers the target model to bypass its own safety guardrails and elaborate on harmful instructions. We evaluate AutoRAN against state-of-the-art LRMs, including GPT-o3/o4-mini and Gemini-2.5-Flash, across multiple benchmarks (AdvBench, HarmBench, and StrongReject). Results show that AutoRAN achieves approaching 100% success rate within one or few turns, effectively neutralizing reasoning-based defenses even when evaluated by robustly aligned external models. This work reveals that the transparency of the reasoning process itself creates a critical and exploitable attack surface, highlighting the urgent need for new defenses that protect models’ reasoning traces rather than merely their final outputs.

Abstract:
Many-Shot In-Context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a promising paradigm, leveraging extensive examples to unlock the reasoning potential of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods typically rely on a predetermined, fixed number of shots. This static approach often fails to adapt to the varying difficulty of different queries, leading to either insufficient context or interference from noise. Furthermore, the prohibitive computational and memory costs of long contexts severely limit Many-Shot’s feasibility. To address the above limitations, we propose AdapShot, which dynamically optimizes shot counts and leverages KV cache reuse for efficient inference. Specifically, we design a probe-based evaluation mechanism that utilizes output entropy to determine the optimal number of shots. To bypass the redundant prefilling computation during both the probing and inference phases, we incorporate a semantics-aware KV cache reuse strategy. Within this reuse strategy, to address positional encoding incompatibilities, we introduce a decoupling and re-encoding method that enables the flexible reordering of cached key-value pairs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AdapShot achieves an average performance gain of ∼ 10% and a 4.64 × speedup compared to state-of-the-art DBSA.

Abstract:
We investigate how role models shape collective morality. To explore this, we build a multi-agent simulation powered by a Large Language Models (LLMs), where agents with diverse intrinsic drives, ranging from cooperative to competitive, interact and adapt through a four-stage cognitive loop (plan-act-observe-reflect). We design four experimental games (Alignment, Collapse, Conflict, and Construction) and conduct motivational ablation studies to identify the key drivers of imitation. The results indicate that identity-driven conformity can substantially reshape the initial dispositions. Agents tend to adapt their values to align with a perceived successful exemplar, leading to rapid value convergence.

Abstract:
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial proficiency in reasoning, current approaches focus disproportionately on scaling correct training samples, underexploring the value of incorrect reasoning trajectories. Motivated by how humans learn from mistakes, we propose ReActR (Reasoning through Error-Activated Reflection), a framework that enhances reasoning by learning reflective behaviors from erroneous trajectories. Specifically, ReActR comprises data construction and training. First, we synthesize multi-turn erroneous reasoning dataset spanning diverse error types and difficult levels via self-generation and targeted error generation. Second, we enhance the model’s capabilities through Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on synthesized data and then apply Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with multiple reward signals to further refine reasoning performance. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks and three LLMs demonstrate that ReActR effectively enhances reasoning performance. Notably, on Llama-3-8B, ReActR achieves an average improvement of 3.5% across the five datasets.

Abstract:
Podcast script generation requires LLMs to synthesize structured, context-grounded dialogue from diverse inputs, yet systematic evaluation resources for this task remain limited. To bridge this gap, we introduce PodBench, a benchmark comprising 800 samples with inputs up to 21K tokens and complex multi-speaker instructions. We propose a multifaceted evaluation framework that integrates quantitative constraints with LLM-based quality assessment. Extensive experiments reveal that while proprietary models generally excel, open-source models equipped with explicit reasoning demonstrate superior robustness in handling long contexts and multi-speaker coordination compared to standard baselines. However, our analysis uncovers a persistent divergence where high instruction following does not guarantee high content substance. PodBench offers a reproducible testbed to address these challenges in long-form, audio-centric script generation.

Abstract:
Laughter is a complex social signal that conveys communicative intent beyond amusement. While prior work has focused on isolated laughter analysis tasks, a comprehensive understanding of laughter in real-world scenarios remains underexplored. We introduce SMILE-Next, a dataset for real-world laughter understanding with multimodal textual representations and question–answer annotations across three tasks: laughter detection, laughter type classification, and laughter reasoning. Building on this dataset, we propose a laughter expert LLM that leverages disentangled multimodal textual cues, together with a Mixture-of-Laugh-Experts framework and laughter-specific self-instruction for task-adaptive specialization. Experimental results show that the combination of our proposed components substantially outperforms multimodal LLM baselines, advancing robust real-world laughter understanding.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are post-trained through reinforcement learning (RL) to evolve into Reasoning Language Models (RLMs), where the hallmark of this advanced reasoning is “aha” moments when they start to perform strategies , such as self-reflection and deep thinking, within chain of thoughts (CoTs). Motivated by this, this paper proposes a novel reinforced strategy injection mechanism (rSIM), that enables any LLM to become an RLM by employing a small planner to guide the LLM’s CoT through the adaptive injection of reasoning strategies. To achieve this, the planner (leader agent) is jointly trained with an LLM (follower agent) using multi-agent RL (MARL), based on a leader-follower framework and straightforward rule-based rewards. Experimental results show that rSIM enables Qwen2.5-0.5B to become an RLM and significantly outperform Qwen2.5-14B across mathematical, coding, and financial reasoning tasks. Moreover, the planner is generalizable: it only needs to be trained once and can be applied as a plug-in to substantially improve the reasoning capabilities of existing LLMs. In addition, the planner supports continual learning across various tasks, allowing its planning abilities to gradually improve and generalize to a wider range of problems. Our source code is available under the examples/rSIM of https://github.com/AgenticFinLab/eparl .

Abstract:
LLMs increasingly exhibit over-refusal behavior, where safety mechanisms cause models to reject benign instructions that seemingly resemble harmful content. This phenomenon diminishes utility in production applications that repeatedly rely on common prompt templates or applications that frequently rely on LLMs for specific tasks (e.g. sentiment analysis, language translation). Through extensive evaluation, we demonstrate that LLMs persist in refusing inputs containing harmful content, even when they are reframed with tasks that have benign intent. Our mechanistic analysis reveals that LLMs follow distinct "constellation" patterns in embedding space as representations traverse layers, with each NLP task maintaining consistent trajectories that shift predictably between refusal and non-refusal cases. We introduce SafeConstellations, an inference-time trajectory-shifting approach that tracks task-specific trajectory patterns and guides representations toward non-refusal pathways. By selectively guiding model behavior only on tasks prone to over-refusal, our method reduces over-refusals with minimal impact on utility—offering a principled and conditional approach to mitigating over-refusals.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves the reasoning capability of Large Language Models (LLMs). Current RLVR trains LLMs on all generated tokens, rather than exploring which tokens actually contribute to reasoning. We propose AIPO(Adaptive–Information Policy Optimization), which focuses updates on those decisive tokens discovered on the fly. AIPO estimates each hidden state’s mutual information to score tokens. Policy gradients are then computed only on these critical tokens, using an advantage that blends information gain and verifiable correctness. To improve the efficiency of mutual-information estimation, AIPO adopts a Random–Fourier approximation of the Hilbert–Schmidt Independence Criterion. Across five math and science benchmarks, AIPO yields up to +20% accuracy over strong RLVR baselines while updating merely 10% of tokens, demonstrating superior efficiency and effectiveness. Our findings highlight the importance of information–driven token selection for efficient and effective reinforcement learning of LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Language agents, i.e., LLM agents, progress rapidly and are increasingly deployed in production environments. This trend underscores the urgent need for rigorous and realistic evaluations. However, most existing benchmarks evaluate agents in simplified, idealized settings. They typically rely on pre-packaged tool interfaces, overlook critical steps, and assume inputs are clean and fully specified. Consequently, they understate the difficulty of real deployments, where uncertainty and noise are ubiquitous and agents must proactively explore the environment to uncover new tools. To bridge this gap, we present AgentGym2, a new evaluation framework with task instances grounded in real-world end-to-end working demands. Beyond reasoning and planning, it measures agents’ ability to execute end-to-end procedures, discover tools via exploration, compose tools for unseen tasks, and remain robust to noisy and underspecified information. Experiments on 15 proprietary and open-source models show that even SOTA systems like Gemini and GPT-5 struggle on AgentGym2, revealing a substantial gap between the capability of current agents and the demands of real-world applications.

Abstract:
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown strong performance in language-conditioned robotic manipulation, yet their robustness to linguistic variation remains poorly understood. In this work, We present the first systematic multilingual evaluation of VLA models by translating the LIBERO benchmark into ten languages, revealing severe performance degradation under non-English instructions, with success rates dropping by 30–50%. Through fine-grained analysis of task executions, we find that language influence is highly non-uniform across steps: certain steps exhibit strong language dependence and dominate overall task failure, while others are largely language-agnostic. Based on this insight, we propose a step-wise inference-time intervention that aligns representations according to step language sensitivity, substantially improving performance under linguistic variation. Our results indicate that language robustness in VLA models is fundamentally a step-wise control problem, highlighting the importance of temporally structured analysis for reliable embodied agents.

Abstract:
LLMs are increasingly used as third-party judges, yet their reliability when evaluating speakers in dialogue remains poorly understood. We show that LLMs judge identical claims differently depending on framing: the same content receives different verdicts when presented as a statement to verify ("Is this statement correct?") versus attributed to a speaker ("Is this speaker correct?"). We call this dialogic deference and introduce DialDefer, a framework for detecting and mitigating these framing-induced judgment shifts. Our Dialogic Deference Score (DDS) captures directional shifts that aggregate accuracy obscures. Across ten domains, 3k+ instances, and five models, conversational framing induces large shifts (mean |DDS| = 15.9 percentage points (pp) across models, p < .0001) while accuracy remains stable (<2 pp), with effects amplifying 2–5× on naturalistic Reddit conversations. This effect is domain-dependent: a single model can shift toward disagreement (skepticism) on graduate-level science and toward agreement (deference) on social judgment. Ablations reveal that human-vs-LLM attribution drives the largest shifts (17.7 pp swing), suggesting models treat disagreement with humans as more costly than with AI. Mitigation attempts can reduce deference but over-correct into skepticism, revealing a calibration problem beyond accuracy optimization.

Abstract:
Harmonized System (HS) code classification is a hierarchically structured and regulation-constrained task, often complicated by short and noisy product descriptions. Misclassification can lead to tariff misapplication, regulatory violations, or delayed customs clearance, which in turn requires predictions to be both semantically appropriate and hierarchically valid. While large language models (LLMs) show strong semantic understanding, their unconstrained generation is poorly aligned with these requirements, often producing non-existent or hierarchically inconsistent codes. We propose HSGraphAgent a knowledge-graph-guided LLM framework that formulates HS classification as a stepwise, regulation-aware reasoning process over an explicit HS knowledge graph. By encoding hierarchical containment relations and regulatory exclusion rules, and enforcing them through a Select-Redirect mechanism, HSGraphAgent constrains inference to legally valid paths while producing explicit and traceable reasoning trajectories. Experiments on taxonomy-wide 4-digit and fine-grained 6-digit HS benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over direct generation and retrieval-augmented baselines, with particularly strong gains in fine-grained and regulation-sensitive classification settings.

Abstract:
Existing explainability methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) typically treat hidden states as static points in activation space, assuming that correct and incorrect inferences can be separated using representations from an individual layer. However, these activations are saturated with polysemantic features, leading to linear probes learning surface-level lexical patterns rather than underlying reasoning structures. We introduce Truth as a Trajectory (TaT), which models the transformer inference as an unfolded trajectory of iterative refinements, shifting analysis from static activations to layer-wise geometric displacement. By analyzing displacement of representations across layers, TaT captures structural patterns in the evolution of inference that distinguish valid reasoning from spurious behavior. We evaluate TaT across dense and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures on benchmarks spanning commonsense reasoning, question answering, and toxicity detection. Without access to the activations themselves and using only changes in activations across layers, we show that TaT effectively mitigates reliance on static lexical confounds, outperforming conventional probing, and establishes trajectory analysis as a complementary perspective on LLM explainability.

Abstract:
Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are typically reused as indivisible artifacts, adapted, merged, or ensembled as a whole. In this study, we show that LLMs can instead be structurally recomposed as modular building blocks to create new architectures without access to original training data. We introduce architecture-level reassembly as a new reuse paradigm, in which Transformer blocks from heterogeneous models are treated as reusable components. This idea is formalized through a two-dimensional reassembly space that supports both vertical recombination across depth and horizontal composition within layers. To make this space tractable, we propose a chromosome-based architectural encoding and perform a bi-level multi-objective evolutionary optimization over vertical structure and horizontal composition. To resolve representation incompatibility across heterogeneous blocks, we introduce lightweight glue layers trained via data-free knowledge distillation, enabling valid information flow without modifying pretrained parameters. Our results demonstrate that architecture-level reassembly unlocks a new dimension of flexibility in model reuse, pointing toward a modular and evolutionary view of LLM design.

Abstract:
We introduce SkMTEB, the first comprehensive MTEB-style text embedding benchmark for Slovak, a low-resource West Slavic language, comprising 31 datasets across 7 task types—nearly 4 × the depth of existing multilingual benchmark coverage for Slovak. Our evaluation of 31 embedding models reveals that large instruction-tuned multilingual models achieve the strongest performance, while existing Slovak-specific models trained for NLU tasks transfer poorly to embedding tasks. To address the need for efficient, locally-deployable Slovak embeddings, we develop e5-sk-small (45M parameters) and e5-sk-large (365M) by applying vocabulary trimming and fine-tuning to Multilingual E5 models. Despite size reductions of up to 62%, our open-source models achieve competitive performance with proprietary APIs while remaining locally deployable for semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). We release the benchmark, models, datasets, and code openly, hoping our approach offers a replicable path for other under-resourced languages.

Abstract:
Multimodal affective computing aims to predict humans’ sentiment, emotion, intention, and opinion using language, acoustic, and visual modalities. However, current models often learn spurious correlations that harm generalization under distribution shifts or noisy modalities. To address this, we propose a causal modality-invariant representation (CmIR) learning framework for robust multimodal learning. At its core, we introduce a theoretically grounded disentanglement method that separates each modality into ‘causal invariant representation’ and ‘environment-specific spurious representation’ from a causal inference perspective. CmIR ensures that the learned invariant representations retain stable predictive relationships with labels across different environments while preserving sufficient information from the raw inputs via invariance constraint, mutual information constraint, and reconstruction constraint. Experiments across multiple multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that CmIR achieves state-of-the-art performance. CmIR particularly excels on out-of-distribution data and noisy data, confirming its robustness and generalizability.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently advanced the field of Automated Theorem Proving (ATP), attaining substantial performance gains through widely adopted test-time scaling strategies, notably reflective Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and increased sampling passes. However, they both introduce significant computational overhead for inference. Moreover, existing cost analyses typically regulate only the number of sampling passes, while neglecting the substantial disparities in sampling costs introduced by different scaling strategies. In this paper, we systematically compare the efficiency of different test-time scaling strategies for ATP models and demonstrate the inefficiency of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) open-source approaches. We then investigate approaches to significantly reduce token usage and sample passes while maintaining the original performance. Specifically, we propose two complementary methods that can be integrated into a unified EconRL pipeline for amplified benefits: (1) a dynamic Chain-of-Thought (CoT) switching mechanism designed to mitigate unnecessary token consumption, and (2) Diverse parallel-scaled reinforcement learning (RL) with trainable prefixes to enhance pass rates under constrained sampling passes. Experiments on miniF2F and ProofNet demonstrate that our EconProver-GD achieves comparable performance to baseline methods with only 12% of the computational cost. This work provides actionable insights for deploying lightweight ATP models without sacrificing performance.

Abstract:
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) transcripts often contain disfluencies, such as fillers, repetitions, and false starts, which reduce readability and hinder downstream applications like chatbots and voice assistants. If left unaddressed, such disfluencies can significantly degrade the reliability of downstream systems. Most existing approaches rely on classical models that focus on identifying disfluent tokens for removal. While this strategy is effective to some extent, it often disrupts grammatical structure and semantic coherence, leading to incomplete or unnatural sentences. Recent literature explored the use of large language models (LLMs); however, these efforts have primarily focused on disfluency detection or data augmentation, rather than performing comprehensive correction. We propose a multilingual correction pipeline where a sequence tagger first marks disfluent tokens, and these signals guide instruction fine-tuning of an LLM to rewrite transcripts into fluent text. To further improve reliability, we add a contrastive learning objective that penalizes the reproduction of disfluent tokens, encouraging the model to preserve grammar and meaning while removing disfluent artifacts. Our experiments across three Indian languages, namely Hindi, Bengali, and Marathi show consistent improvements over strong baselines, including multilingual sequence-to-sequence models. These results highlight that detection-only strategies are insufficient. Combining token-level cues with instruction tuning and contrastive learning provides a practical and scalable solution for multilingual disfluency correction in speech-driven NLP systems. We make the codes publicly available at https://github.com/deepak-kumar-98/Mind-the-Pause.

Abstract:
Evaluating speech generation still relies heavily on human judgments, such as Mean Opinion Score (MOS), which are expensive, subjective, and difficult to reproduce at scale. While a few recent studies have begun to explore AudioLLM-based judge models, existing efforts typically target only a narrow set of scenarios (e.g., utterance-level quality or single-turn dialogue) and provide limited coverage of diverse speech generation tasks and evaluation dimensions. In this work, we propose UniSRM, a unified speech reward model that can support multi-dimensional, interpretable reward signals with reliable reasoning. To support training and evaluation, we introduce UniSRM-Data and UniSRM-Bench, covering speech evaluation tasks from utterance-level quality to context-level coherence. Based on this dataset, we present the unified speech reward model, UniSRM, with a two-stage pipeline that enables reasoning-based fine-grained assessment. Furthermore, we introduce Reasoning-Consistent Rewards to improve the reliability of the reasoning process. Experiments show that UniSRM delivers more reliable and human-aligned judgments across a broad range of speech evaluation tasks, offering a practical foundation for scalable and unified evaluation of speech quality.

Abstract:
This paper presents a novel Automated Red Teaming (ART) framework that shifts from example-based to policy-based evaluation, addressing critical limitations in scalability and validity. We define harmful content through abstract safety policies rather than specific static examples. We also introduce multiple evaluation objectives: risk coverage, semantic diversity, and fidelity, and discover Pareto trade-offs between them. We propose Jailbreak-Zero, a black-box method capable of both zero-shot generation and fine-tuned exploitation of a victim’s vulnerabilities to achieve Pareto optimality. Unlike prior approaches, it does not require expert-designed strategies/prompts, but still achieves superior, human-readable attacks against open-source and proprietary models (attack success rates of 99.5% against GPT-4o and 96.0% against Claude 3.5), even for unseen safety policies. It retains efficacy even after victim models undergo safety alignment, and exposes controls to navigate Pareto trade-offs without retraining. Lastly, we show that Jailbreak-Zero is the best-performing ART method at a given compute budget. Code is available at: https://github.com/hukkai/jailbreak-zero/ .

Abstract:
Understanding what kinds of factual knowledge large language models (LLMs) memorize is essential for evaluating their reliability and limitations.Entity-based QA is a common framework for analyzing non-verbatim memorization, but typical evaluations query each entity using a single canonical surface form, making it difficult to disentangle fact memorization from access through a particular name.We introduce RedirectQA, an entity-based QA dataset that uses Wikipedia redirect information to associate Wikidata factual triples with categorized surface forms for each entity, including alternative names, abbreviations, spelling variants, and common erroneous forms.Across 13 LLMs, we examine surface-conditioned factual memorization and find that prediction outcomes often change when only the entity surface form changes.This inconsistency is category-dependent: models are more robust to minor orthographic variations than to larger lexical variations such as aliases and abbreviations.Frequency analyses further suggest that both entity- and surface-level frequencies are associated with accuracy, and that entity frequency often contributes beyond surface frequency.Overall, factual memorization appears neither purely surface-specific nor fully surface-invariant, highlighting the importance of surface-form diversity in evaluating non-verbatim memorization.

Abstract:
Measuring the quality of public deliberation requires evaluating not only civility or argument structure, but also the informational progress of a conversation. We introduce a framework for Conversational Information Gain (CIG) that evaluates each utterance in terms of how it advances collective understanding of the target topic. To operationalize CIG, we model an evolving semantic memory of the discussion: the system extracts atomic claims from utterances and incrementally consolidates them into a structured memory state. Using this memory, we score each utterance along three interpretable dimensions: Novelty, Relevance, and Implication Scope. We annotate 80 segments from two moderated deliberative settings (TV debates and community discussions) with these dimensions and show that memory-derived dynamics (e.g., the number of claim updates) correlate more strongly with human-perceived CIG than traditional heuristics such as utterance length or TF–IDF. We develop effective LLM-based CIG predictors paving the way for information-focused conversation quality analysis in dialogues and deliberative success.

Abstract:
Large language models have seen widespread adoption, yet they remain vulnerable to multi-turn jailbreak attacks, threatening their safe deployment. This has led to the task of training automated multi-turn attackers to probe model safety vulnerabilities. However, existing approaches typically rely on turn-level optimization, which is insufficient for learning long-term attack strategies. To bridge this gap, we formulate this task as a multi-turn reinforcement learning problem, directly optimizing the harmfulness of the final-turn response as the outcome reward. To address the sparse supervision of the outcome reward, we introduce TROJail, which employs two process rewards to evaluate the utility of intermediate prompts and integrate them into advantage estimation. These rewards (1) penalize overly harmful prompts that trigger the model’s refusal mechanism, and (2) encourage steering the semantic relevance of responses toward the targeted harmful content. Experimental results show improved attack success rates across multiple models and benchmarks, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TROJail . Warning: This paper contains examples of harmful content.

Abstract:
Achieving seamless, human-like interaction remains a key challenge for full-duplex spoken dialogue models (SDMs). Reinforcement learning (RL) has substantially enhanced text- and vision-language models, while well-designed reward signals are crucial for the performance of RL. We consider RL a promising strategy to address the key challenge for SDMs. However, a fundamental barrier persists: prevailing automated metrics for assessing interaction quality rely on superficial proxies, such as behavioral statistics or timing-prediction accuracy, failing to provide reliable reward signals for RL. On the other hand, human evaluations, despite their richness, remain costly, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. We tackle this critical barrier by proposing a Dual-Axis Generative Reward Model, which is trained to understand complex interaction dynamics using a detailed taxonomy and an annotated dataset, produces a single score and, crucially, provides separate evaluations for semantic quality and interaction timing. Such dual outputs furnish precise diagnostic feedback for SDMs and deliver a dependable, instructive reward signal suitable for online reinforcement learning. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on interaction-quality assessment across a wide spectrum of datasets, spanning synthetic dialogues and complex real-world interactions.

Abstract:
Counterfactuals refer to minimally edited inputs that cause a model’s prediction to change, serving as a promising approach to explaining the model’s behavior. Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating English counterfactuals and demonstrate multilingual proficiency. However, their effectiveness in generating multilingual counterfactuals remains unclear. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive study on multilingual counterfactuals. We first conduct automatic evaluations on both directly generated counterfactuals in the target languages and those derived via English translation across six languages. Although translation-based counterfactuals offer higher validity than their directly generated counterparts, they demand substantially more modifications and still fall short of matching the quality of the original English counterfactuals. Second, we find the patterns of edits applied to high-resource European-language counterfactuals to be remarkably similar, suggesting that cross-lingual perturbations follow common strategic principles. Third, we reveal that multilingual counterfactual data augmentation (CDA) yields larger model performance improvements than cross-lingual CDA, especially for lower-resource languages. Yet, the imperfections of the generated counterfactuals limit gains in model performance and robustness. Finally, we identify and categorize four main types of errors that consistently appear in the generated counterfactuals across languages.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for understanding large codebases, but whether they understand operational semantics of long code context or rely on pattern matching shortcuts remains unclear. We distinguish between lexical recall (retrieving code verbatim) and semantic recall (understanding operational semantics). Evaluating 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that while frontier models achieve near-perfect, position-independent lexical recall, semantic recall degrades severely when code is centrally positioned in long contexts. We introduce semantic recall sensitivity to measure whether tasks require understanding of code’s operational semantics vs. permit pattern matching shortcuts. Through a novel counterfactual measurement method, we show that models rely heavily on pattern matching shortcuts to solve existing code understanding benchmarks. We propose a new task SemTrace, which achieves high semantic recall sensitivity through unpredictable operations; LLMs’ accuracy exhibits severe positional effects, with median accuracy drops of 92.73% versus CRUXEval’s 53.36% as the relevant code snippet approaches the middle of the input code context. Our findings suggest current evaluations substantially underestimate semantic recall failures in long context code understanding.

Abstract:
Computer use agents (CUAs) can operate real-world digital interfaces but remain difficult to train due to the high cost of graphical user interface (GUI) interaction and the scarcity of high-quality trajectory data. Existing datasets rely on human demonstrations, limiting scalability. A natural alternative is to synthesize data from strong CUAs, yet their rollouts are highly noisy, with incorrect or suboptimal actions consisting a large proportion of the steps, making naive imitation ineffective. To tackle this challenge, we introduce a scalable data synthesis pipeline that transforms noisy rollouts into reliable supervision without human annotation. The core idea is step-level filtering, which evaluates actions individually to retain only correct steps, complemented by reasoning augmentation for improved planning. Using this pipeline, we construct WebSTAR, a dataset of 13.3K trajectories and 267K graded, reasoning-rich steps synthesized from OpenAI’s computer-use-preview model. We train Qwen-2.5-VL-Instruct models (7B and 32B) on WebSTAR. On WebVoyager, our 7B model surpasses SoTA open-source CUA model UI-TARS-1.5-7B by more than 15% with only supervised finetuning. Building on step-level grading, we further create WebSCORE, a dataset of graded step-level actions, and train StepRM, a 7B multimodal reward model distilled from o4-mini, which matches its grading quality while being far more efficient to deploy at scale. Our results establish step-level filtering as a key principle for scalable CUA training and construct two new datasets (WebSTAR, WebSCORE) and a lightweight reward model (StepRM) as practical tools to advance robust and efficient CUAs.

Abstract:
Scientific research relies on accurate information retrieval from literature to support analytical decisions.In this work, we introduce a new task, INformation reTRieval through literAture reVIEW (IntraView), which aims to automate fine-grained information retrieval faithfully grounded in the provided content in response to research-driven queries, and propose IntrAgent, an LLM-based agent that addresses this challenging task.In particular, IntrAgent is designed to mimic human behaviors when reading literature for information retrieval - identifying relevant sections and then iteratively extracting key details to refine the retrieved information.It follows a two-stage pipeline: a Section Ranking stage that prioritizes relevant literature sections through structural-knowledge-enabled reasoning, and an Iterative Reading stage that continuously extracts details and synthesizes them into concise, contextually grounded answers.To support rigorous evaluation, we introduce IntraBench, a new benchmark consisting of 315 test instances built from expert-authored questions paired with literature spanning five STEM domains.Across seven backbone LLMs, IntrAgent achieves on average 13.2% higher cross-domain accuracy than state-of-the-art RAG and research-agent baselines.

Abstract:
Current Text-to-SQL reasoning models often lack integrated execution feedback during generation, and most existing approaches utilize feedback only for post-hoc correction. This separation not only limits real-time error correction, but may also introduce mistakes by altering otherwise correct SQL queries. To address these challenges, we present ReEx-SQL (Reasoning with Execution-Aware Reinforcement Learning), a Text-to-SQL framework that interacts with the SQL execution engine during decoding and dynamically adjusts reasoning based on execution feedback, thereby enabling context-sensitive query refinement and improved accuracy. ReEx-SQL achieves this through structured prompts with markup tags and a stepwise rollout strategy that incorporates execution feedback at each generation stage. For policy supervision, we design a composite reward function—featuring an exploration reward—to explicitly encourage effective interaction with the database. Furthermore, ReEx-SQL adopts a tree-based decoding strategy to facilitate exploratory reasoning and primarily aims to enhance parallel decoding efficiency. Notably, ReEx-SQL achieves 89.1% accuracy on Spider and 65.3% on BIRD at the 7B scale, surpassing baseline models by 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively. In addition, its tree-based decoding accelerates inference by 51.9% compared to linear decoding during sampling.

Abstract:
Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in academic workflows, their capabilities remain limited in supporting high-quality scientific writing. Most existing systems are designed for general-purpose scientific text generation and fail to meet the sophisticated demands of research communication beyond surface-level polishing, for example, maintaining conceptual coherence across sections. Furthermore, academic writing is inherently iterative and revision-driven, a process that is not well supported by direct prompting-based paradigms. To address these scenarios, we propose a human-AI collaboration framework for academic paper revision, centered on criteria-guided intent alignment and context-aware modeling. To validate the framework, we curate a dataset of 7,000 research papers from top-tier venues, annotated with 140,000 instruction–response pairs that reflect realistic, section-level scientific revisions. We instantiate the framework in XtraGPT, the first suite of open-source LLMs (1.5B to 14B parameters) specifically fine-tuned for context-aware academic paper revision. Extensive experiments show that XtraGPT significantly outperforms same-scale baselines and rivals the quality of proprietary counterparts. Both automated preference assessments and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of XtraGPT in improving scientific drafts. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT and https://huggingface.co/collections/Xtra-Computing/xtragpt.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based optimization has recently shown promise for autonomous problem solving, yet most approaches still cast LLMs as passive constraint checkers rather than proactive strategy designers, limiting their effectiveness on complex Constraint Optimization Problems (COPs). To address this, we present AutoCO, an end-to-end Automated Constraint Optimization method that tightly couples operations-research principles of constraint relaxation with LLM reasoning. A core innovation is a unified triple-representation that binds relaxation strategies, algorithmic principles, and executable codes. This design enables the LLM to synthesize, justify, and instantiate relaxation strategies that are both principled and executable. To navigate fragmented solution spaces, AutoCO employs a bidirectional global–local coevolution mechanism, synergistically coupling Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) for global relaxation-trajectory exploration with Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) for local solution intensification. This continuous exchange of priors and feedback explicitly balances diversification and intensification, thus preventing premature convergence. Extensive experiments on three challenging COP benchmarks validate AutoCO’s consistent effectiveness and superior performance, especially in hard regimes where current methods degrade. Results highlight AutoCO as a principled and effective path toward proactive, verifiable LLM-driven optimization.

Abstract:
Current evaluation paradigms for emotional support conversations tend to reward generic empathetic responses, yet they fail to assess whether the support is genuinely personalized to users’ unique psychological profiles and contextual needs. We introduce EmoHarbor , an automated evaluation framework that adopts a User-as-a-Judge paradigm by simulating the user’s inner world. EmoHarbor employs a Chain-of-Agent architecture that decomposes users’ internal processes into three specialized roles, enabling agents to interact with supporters and complete assessments in a manner similar to human users. We instantiate this benchmark using 100 real-world user profiles that cover diverse personality traits and situations, and define 10 evaluation dimensions of personalized support quality. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 advanced LLMs on EmoHarbor reveals a critical insight: while these models excel at generating empathetic responses, they consistently fail to tailor support to individual user contexts. This finding reframes the central challenge, shifting research focus from merely enhancing generic empathy to developing truly user-aware emotional support. EmoHarbor provides a reproducible and scalable framework to guide the development and evaluation of more nuanced and user-aware emotional support systems.

Abstract:
Translating brain signals into text could restore communication for people with severe paralysis, yet practically usable systems to date rely on invasive electrocorticography (ECoG). Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a non-invasive alternative, and EEG-to-text (EEG2Text) has been widely explored. Interestingly, however, EEG2Text models generally rely on teacher-forcing evaluation; without it, they fail to generate meaningful decoding. This reliance prevents EEG2Text from being applied in real-world, non-academic settings. This has fueled numerous debates about whether EEG2Text is a meaningful direction, by extension, and whether EEG truly contains decodable linguistic information. Here, using a neuropsychology-informed paradigm, we find that existing EEG2Text benchmarks have neglected EEG instability, a flaw that has confounded inference and sparked debate. Our experiments furnish key evidence for the feasibility of teacher-forcing-free EEG2Text decoding. Accordingly, we assemble the Corpus OF Eeg-To-Text (COFETT) using a 128-channel high-density EEG cap, providing a benchmark dedicated to evaluating EEG2Text models. In comparisons with multiple existing benchmarks, COFETT achieves SOTA ability to distinguish among model performances and enables robust, teacher-forcing-free evaluation, thereby opening a path toward practical EEG2Text applications. COFETT is open sourced in https://github.com/baoyudu/COFETT.

Abstract:
A hallmark of human innovation is recombination—the creation of novel ideas by integrating elements from existing concepts and mechanisms. In this work, we introduce CHIMERA, the first large-scale Knowledge Base (KB) of recombination examples automatically mined from the scientific literature. CHIMERA enables empirical analysis of how scientists recombine concepts and draw inspiration from different areas, and enables training models that propose cross-disciplinary research directions. To construct this KB, we define a new information extraction task: identifying recombination instances in papers. We curate an expert-annotated dataset and use it to fine-tune an LLM-based extraction model, which we apply to a broad corpus of AI papers. We also demonstrate generalization to a biological domain. We showcase the utility of CHIMERA through two applications. First, we analyze patterns of recombination across AI subfields. Second, we train a scientific hypothesis generation model using the KB, showing that it can propose directions that researchers rate as inspiring.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general reasoning, yet the community lacks controllable, scalable, and verifiable tools to analyze and improve these abilities. We present SATQuest, a verifier that generates diverse SAT-based reasoning tasks directly from Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) instances and checks answers objectively with PySAT. SATQuest factorizes evaluation along three orthogonal dimensions—instance, problem type, and question format—enabling fine-grained, multi-dimensional analysis and reinforcement fine-tuning. Randomized CNF generation mitigates memorization and supports reproducible experiments. Using SATQuest, we benchmark a range of open- and closed-weight LLMs and uncover persistent gaps in logical reasoning, particularly on higher-complexity tasks and in transfer beyond familiar mathematical notation to machine or narrative formats. We further show that reinforcement fine-tuning with SATQuest rewards substantially boosts targeted performance and generalizes to larger instances, while cross-format robustness remains challenging. Collectively, SATQuest provides verifier-backed infrastructure for controlled, scalable, and reproducible empirical research on LLM logical reasoning and its training.

Abstract:
We present ChatR1, a reasoning framework based on reinforcement learning (RL) for conversational question answering (CQA). Reasoning plays an important role in CQA, where user intent evolves across dialogue turns, and utterances are often underspecified, requiring contextual interpretation, query reformulation, and dynamic coordination between retrieval and generation. Unlike static ‘rewrite, retrieve, and generate’ pipelines, ChatR1 interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through RL. To address the challenge of sparse and delayed rewards in RL, we propose an intent-aware reward that provides turn-level feedback by aligning retrieval and reasoning with evolving user goals. ChatR1 demonstrates strong performance on both 3B and 7B model backbones, outperforming competitive models on five CQA datasets, measured by different metrics (F1, BERTScore, and LLM-as-judge). We include a diverse set of CQA datasets to cover topic shifts, evolving intents, mixed-initiative dialogues, and multi-document grounding, testing ChatR1’s performance from various aspects. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of the intent-aware reward. Our analyses further reveal diverse reasoning trajectories and effective use of the search tool. ChatR1 also generalizes robustly across domains, demonstrating that RL-based reasoning enables more flexible and context-aware behavior than static CQA pipelines.

Abstract:
Machine unlearning has gained increasing attention in recent years, as a promising technique to selectively remove unwanted privacy or copyrighted information from Large Language Models that are trained on a massive scale of human data. However, the emergence of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), which emphasize long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to address complex questions, presents a dilemma to unlearning: existing methods either struggle to completely eliminate undesired knowledge from the CoT traces or degrade the reasoning performances due to the interference with the reasoning process. To this end, we introduce Counterfactual Unlearning through iterative Preference Optimization (CiPO), a novel framework that redefines unlearning as the targeted intervention of the CoT reasoning in LRMs. More specifically, given a desired unlearning target answer, CiPO instructs LRMs to generate a logically valid counterfactual reasoning trace for preference tuning. As the LRM adjusts to the counterfactual trace, CiPO iteratively updates the preference learning data to increase the discrepancy from the original model. This iterative loop ensures both desirable unlearning and smooth optimization, effectively mitigating the dilemma. Experiments on challenging benchmarks demonstrate that CiPO excels at unlearning, completely removing knowledge from both the intermediate CoT steps and the final answer, while preserving the reasoning abilities of LRMs.

Abstract:
Feature engineering has long been central to recommender systems, yet effectively leveraging textual item features remains challenging. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use as semantic encoders for recommendation, but their roles and behaviors in this setting are still not well understood. Prior studies often rely on general-purpose embedding benchmarks (e.g., MTEB) when selecting LLMs, overlooking the unique characteristics of recommendation tasks. To address this gap, we introduce BLaIR, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs as semantic encoders in recommendation scenarios. We contribute (1) a new large-scale Amazon Reviews 2023 dataset with over 570 million reviews and 48 million items, (2) a unified benchmark covering sequential recommendation, collaborative filtering, and product search, and (3) a new complex-query product search task featuring both semi-synthetic and real-world evaluation datasets. Experiments with 11 leading LLMs show that their rankings on BLaIR show little correlation with MTEB, highlighting the unique challenges of semantic encoding in recommendation.

Abstract:
Privacy policies are essential for users to understand how service providers handle their personal data. However, these documents are often long and complex, as well as filled with technobabble and legalese, causing users to unknowingly accept terms that may even contradict the law. While summarizing and interpreting these privacy policies is crucial, there is a lack of high-quality English parallel corpus optimized for legal clarity and readability. To address this issue, we introduce APPSI-139, a high-quality English privacy policy corpus meticulously annotated by domain experts, specifically designed for summarization and interpretation tasks. The corpus includes 139 English privacy policies, 15,692 rewritten parallel corpora, and 36,351 fine-grained annotation labels across 11 data practice categories. Concurrently, we propose TCSI-pp-V2, a hybrid privacy policy summarization and interpretation framework that employs an alternating training strategy and coordinates multiple expert modules to effectively balance computational efficiency and accuracy. Experimental results show that the hybrid summarization system built on APPSI-139 corpus and the TCSI-pp-V2 framework outperform large language models, such as GPT-4o and LLaMA-3-70B, in terms of readability and reliability. The source code and dataset are available at https://github.com/EnlightenedAI/APPSI-139.

Abstract:
As the text generated by large language models (LLMs) increasingly resembles human-written text (HWT), detecting LLM-generated text (LGT) is crucial to avoid malicious use of LGT. Recent research treats LGT detection as an out-of-distribution (OOD) detection problem and views HWT as the OOD. However, existing OOD detection methods assume that LGT is a single homogeneous distribution. In practice, LGT exhibits different characteristics under different generation conditions. Text from weaker LLMs tends to form distinct clusters and is easy to detect, whereas text from stronger models significantly overlaps with HWTs and is hard to detect. To address the issue, in this paper, we propose an LGT detection framework based on density-aware manifold learning and the construction of hybrid Mahalanobis energy. We apply density-aware manifold learning with Laplacian smoothness and density regularization in embedding space, amplifying differences between LGT and HWT. We further propose a density-adaptive hybrid Mahalanobis metric that combines global and local covariance via density weighting, enabling adaptation to the manifold-aware embedding space. Finally, based on the metric, we define the distribution energy as a measure of distribution discrepancy, and we employ energy learning and contrastive learning to separate distributions hierarchically, establishing a clear OOD decision boundary. Experiments show that our method outperforms strong baselines.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method for large language models. Under a fixed rank budget, LoRA parameterizes each adapted weight through a single low-dimensional input-side pathway, which may couple heterogeneous behaviors through shared input directions and induce interference during optimization. We propose Static Orthogonal Subspace LoRA (SOS-LoRA), a drop-in extension that reparameterizes a rank- r tot update as a sum of K static (always-on, non-routed) low-rank experts. SOS-LoRA (i) decomposes the total rank across experts, (ii) applies a fixed multi-scale scaling scheme to encourage scale-separated optimization dynamics, and (iii) promotes diverse input-side directions via cross-expert orthogonal initialization and a lightweight regularizer. SOS-LoRA remains fully mergeable, adding no inference-time parameters or latency after merging. Experiments on reasoning and knowledge-intensive benchmarks (Llama 2/3), encoder-based NLU (GLUE), and math reasoning (GSM8K/MATH) show consistent gains over matched-budget LoRA baselines and recent variants.

Abstract:
The rapid evolution of end-to-end spoken dialogue systems demands transcending mere textual semantics to incorporate paralinguistic nuances and the spontaneous nature of human conversation. However, current methods struggle with two critical gaps: the modality gap, involving prosody and emotion, and the colloquialness gap, distinguishing written scripts from natural speech. To address these challenges, we introduce SDiaReward, an end-to-end multi-turn reward model trained on SDiaReward-Dataset, a novel collection of episode-level preference pairs explicitly targeting these gaps. It operates directly on full multi-turn speech episodes and is optimized with pairwise preference supervision, enabling joint assessment of modality and colloquialness in a single evaluator. We further establish ESDR-Bench, a stratified benchmark for robust episode-level evaluation. Experiments demonstrate that SDiaReward achieves state-of-the-art pairwise preference accuracy, significantly outperforming general-purpose audio LLMs. Further analysis suggests that SDiaReward captures relative conversational expressiveness beyond superficial synthesis cues, improving generalization across domains and recording conditions.

Abstract:
Recent efforts to accelerate inference in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have largely focused on visual token compression. The effectiveness of these methods is commonly evaluated by measuring the accuracy drop on existing MLLM benchmarks before and after compression. However, these benchmarks are originally designed to assess general perception and reasoning abilities, rather than the specific challenges posed by visual token compression, leading to a fundamental task mismatch. In this work, we uncover a counterintuitive yet consistent phenomenon: simple image downsampling outperforms many advanced visual token compression methods across multiple widely used benchmarks. Through a comprehensive empirical study spanning eight popular benchmarks and multiple state-of-the-art compression techniques, we show that (i) current benchmarks contain substantial noise (task-irrelevant samples) for evaluating visual token compression, and (ii) downsampling can act as an effective data filter that distinguishes between simple and difficult samples with respect to compression sensitivity. Motivated by these findings, we propose VTC-Bench, an evaluation framework that explicitly leverages downsampling as a discriminator to denoise existing benchmarks, enabling a fairer and more meaningful additional assessment of visual token compression methods.

Abstract:
Modern software development demands code that is maintainable, testable, and scalable by organizing the implementation into modular components with iterative reuse of existing codes. We formalize this iterative, multi-turn paradigm as codeflow and introduce CodeFlowBench , the first benchmark designed to comprehensively evaluate LLMs’ ability to perform codeflow - implementing new functionality by reusing existing functions over multiple turns. CodeFlowBench comprises two complementary components: CodeFlowBench-Comp, a core collection of 5,000+ competitive programming problems from Codeforces updated via an automated pipeline and CodeFlowBench-Repo, which is sourced from GitHub repositories to better reflect real-world scenarios. Furthermore, a novel evaluation framework featured dual assessment protocol and structural metrics derived from dependency trees is introduced. Extensive experiments reveal significant performance degradation in multi-turn codeflow scenarios. Furthermore, our in-depth analysis illustrates that model performance inversely correlates with dependency complexity. These findings not only highlight the critical challenges for supporting real-world workflows, but also establish CodeFlowBench as an essential tool for advancing code generation research.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) scales capacity via conditional computation, but Transformers lack a native knowledge lookup primitive. We introduce conditional memory, instantiated via Deep Sparse Embedding (DSE), which indexes a massive embedding table using local n-grams for retrieval. We formalize sparsity allocation problem—how to split a fixed parameter budget between MoE experts and DSE memory—and find a U-shaped scaling law that identifies an optimal balance. Scaling to 27B parameters, DSE outperform an iso-parameter and iso-FLOPs MoE baseline across knowledge and reasoning benchmarks, and achieve markedly stronger long-context performance. Mechanistic analyses show that DSE offloads early-layer static recall into memory, freeing effective depth and attention for higher-level reasoning. DSE is also infrastructure-efficient: its deterministic hashing enables offloading massive parameters into host memory during inference with negligible throughput overhead.

Abstract:
Evaluating meeting effectiveness is crucial for improving organizational productivity. Current approaches rely on post-hoc surveys that yield a single coarse-grained score for an entire meeting. The reliance on manual assessment is inherently limited in scalability, cost, and reproducibility. Moreover, a single score fails to capture the dynamic nature of collaborative discussions. We propose a new paradigm for evaluating meeting effectiveness centered on novel criteria and temporal fine-grained approach. We define effectiveness as the rate of objective achievement over time and assess it for individual topical segments within a meeting. To support this task, we introduce the AMI Meeting Effectiveness (AMI-ME) dataset, a new meta-evaluation dataset containing 2,459 human-annotated segments from 130 AMI Corpus meetings. We also develop an automatic effectiveness evaluation framework that uses a Large Language Model (LLM) as a judge to score each segment’s effectiveness relative to the overall meeting objectives. Through substantial experiments, we establish a comprehensive benchmark for this new task and evaluate the framework’s generalizability across distinct meeting types, ranging from business scenarios to unstructured discussions. Furthermore, we benchmark end-to-end performance starting from raw speech to measure the capabilities of a complete system. Our results validate the framework’s effectiveness and provide strong baselines to facilitate future research in meeting analysis and multi-party dialogue. Our dataset and code will be publicly available.

Abstract:
In recent years, CLIP-based text-video retrieval methods have developed rapidly, with research focusing on constructing diverse features and achieving effective interactions. However, the asymmetry of cross-modal information poses a challenge to accurately establishing retrieval relationships. To overcome this challenge, we propose a novel video retrieval framework, termed the Dual-Pathway and Dual-View model (DPDV), which consists of the Dual-Pathway Partitioning Module (DPPM) for constructing features at an appropriate granularity and the Dual-View Interaction Module (DVIM) for performing effective feature interactions. For DPPM, we simulate a human macro-level cognitive perspective by partitioning visual features into two categories based on their relevance to the text query and supplementing less relevant features with additional textual information. For DVIM, we simulate a human alignment strategy from macro to micro levels, focusing on local visual features while comprehensively modeling fine-grained interactions. We evaluate DPDV on five benchmark datasets, achieving leading retrieval performance.

Abstract:
The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has extended text generation tasks into the literary domain. However, AI-generated literary creations has raised increasingly prominent issues of creative authenticity and ethics in literary world, making the detection of LLM-generated literary texts essential and urgent. While previous works have made significant progress in detecting AI-generated text, it has yet to address classical Chinese poetry. Due to the unique linguistic features of classical Chinese poetry, such as strict metrical regularity, a shared system of poetic imagery, and flexible syntax, distinguishing whether a poem is authored by AI presents a substantial challenge. To address these issues, we introduce ChangAn, a benchmark for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry that containing total 30,664 poems, 10,276 are human-written poems and 20,388 poems are generated by four popular LLMs. Based on ChangAn, we conducted a systematic evaluation of 12 AI detectors, investigating their performance variations across different text granularities and generation strategies. Our findings highlight the limitations of current Chinese text detectors, which fail to serve as reliable tools for detecting LLM-generated classical Chinese poetry. These results validate the effectiveness and necessity of our proposed ChangAn benchmark. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/VelikayaScarlet/ChangAn .

Abstract:
Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) achieve strong performance across multimodal tasks by integrating visual perception with language understanding. However, how vision information contributes to the model’s decoding process remains under-explored, as reflected in frequent hallucinations. Through a series of analyses, we found that (i) vision tokens provide meaningful visual information even when hallucinations occur, and (ii) their semantics are encoded in the textual space and become explicit under appropriate vocabulary constraints. Building on these observations, we propose ReVisiT, a simple training-free decoding method that guides text generation in LVLMs by Referencing Vision Tokens. Our approach leverages the semantic information embedded within vision tokens by projecting them into the text token distribution. Specifically, ReVisiT dynamically selects the most relevant vision token at each decoding step via context-aware constrained divergence minimization. Then, ReVisiT uses its constrained projection to refine the output distribution to better incorporate visual semantics. Across five benchmarks on recent LVLMs, ReVisiT consistently enhances visual grounding with minimal computational overhead, and achieves competitive or superior results to state-of-the-art decoding baselines while reducing computational cost by up to 2× .

Abstract:
Despite the rapid progress of LLMs, their evaluation remains hindered by static, manually curated benchmarks with limited task coverage and poor adaptability to emerging domains. Existing automated approaches typically operate within fixed task schemas and often fail to autonomously discover new evaluation dimensions, limiting both scalability and effectiveness. To address these gaps, we propose AutoTaskEval, an automated framework that constructs domain-specific benchmarks directly from unstructured corpora. Using a refined Bloom’s Taxonomy, the framework systematically discovers tasks, enriches contextual grounding via iterative Socratic prompting, and generates diverse, progressively challenging evaluation instances. Applied to the complex and knowledge-intensive legal domain, AutoTaskEval uncovers a broader and more fine-grained task space than expert-curated benchmarks while producing high-quality instances that preserve established model-level evaluation trends. We further validate its robustness in a low-structure e-commerce review domain. Together, these results show that AutoTaskEval enables scalable, adaptive, and high-fidelity LLM assessment across domains and model families, advancing autonomous and capability-sensitive evaluation.

Abstract:
Warmth (W) (often further broken down intoTrust (T) and Sociability (S)) and Competence (C) are central dimensions along which people evaluate individuals and social groups (Fiske, 2018). While these constructs are well established in social psychology, they are only starting to get attention in NLP research through word-level lexicons, which do not fully capture their contextual expression in larger text units and discourse. In this work, we introduceWarmth and Competence Sentences (W C-Sent), the first sentence-level dataset annotated for warmth and competence. The dataset includes over 1,600 English sentence–target pairs annotated along three dimensions: trust and sociability (components of warmth), and competence. The sentences in W C-Sent are social media posts that express attitudes and opinions about specific individuals or social groups (the targets of our annotations). We describe the data collection, annotation, and quality-control procedures in detail, and evaluate a range of large language models (LLMs) on their ability to identify trust, sociability, and competence in text. W C-Sent provides a new resource for analyzing warmth and competence in language and supports future research at the intersection of NLP and computational social science.

Abstract:
Jailbreak attacks serve as a pivotal technique for evaluating the safety alignment of Large language models. Current token-level attacks have shown remarkable efficacy on open-source models by leveraging gradient-based optimization. However, these attacks suffer from poor cross-model transferability, severely limiting their utility on proprietary ones. To address this limitation, we propose Reparameterization Invariance Gradient-based Jailbreak (RIGJ), a natural gradient based framework designed to improve cross-model transferability. Unlike prior token-level methods whose optimization paths are constrained by model-specific Euclidean geometry, RIGJ defines update directions according to differences in output distributions rather than parameter-space distances. Since language models are trained to capture similar dependency structures of natural language, their output distributions share common geometry across architectures, yielding intrinsically model-agnostic optimization trajectories and substantially stronger jailbreak transferability. Extensive experiments demonstrate superior performance, increasing the cross-model Attack Success Rate and Average Harmfulness Score by 14.9 and 1.23, respectively. Our code is provided https://github.com/nohuma/AISafety_transfer_jailbreak_RIGJ_2026.

Abstract:
A fundamental obstacle to causal discovery from text is the lack of causally annotated text data for use as ground truth, due to high annotation costs. This motivates an important task of generating text with causal graph annotations. Early template-based generation methods sacrifice text naturalness in exchange for high causal graph annotation accuracy. Recent Large Language Model (LLM)-dependent methods directly generate natural text from target graphs through LLMs, but do not guarantee causal graph annotation accuracy. Therefore, we propose iTAG, which performs real-world concept assignment to nodes before converting causal graphs into text in existing LLM-dependent methods. iTAG frames this process as an inverse problem with the causal graph as the target, iteratively examining and refining concept selection through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning so that the induced relations between concepts are as consistent as possible with the target causal relationships described by the causal graph. iTAG demonstrates both extremely high annotation accuracy and naturalness across extensive tests, and the results of testing text-based causal discovery algorithms with the generated data show high statistical correlation with real-world data. This suggests that iTAG-generated data can serve as a practical surrogate for scalable benchmarking of text-based causal discovery algorithms.

Abstract:
High-quality data is the cornerstone of advancing large language models. However, the field currently faces a critical dilemma: the supply of premium data is nearing depletion, while vast stale corpora remain underutilized. Our empirical analysis reveals that training models on such data directly often leads to performance degradation. We attribute this phenomenon to the data affinity gap, a misalignment stemming from the model’s inability to effectively comprehend the data or inherent quality defects. To bridge this gap, we propose Restoring Stale Data Affinity (RSDA) framework. First, utilizing our proposed potential entropy metric, RSDA quantifies the latent value of samples to effectively identify stale data with higher renovation potential. Subsequently, the framework employs a dynamic renovation strategy selection mechanism to determine the optimal component-level strategy for each instance, transforming low-affinity stale samples into high-quality training data. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate that RSDA effectively enhances data affinity, achieving performance improvements using less than 10% of the data volume, thereby underscoring that the latent potential of stale corpora remains largely untapped. The code is available at https://github.com/wenfiii/RSDA.

Abstract:
Multilingual text embeddings are often assumed to encode meaning in a perspective-independent semantic space, yielding stable similarity judgments across tasks and languages. Our results show that this assumption does not hold in practice. We introduce SEA-BED, a large-scale benchmark covering 10 Southeast Asian (SEA) languages and diverse embedding tasks, designed to systematically examine how embedding performance varies across tasks, languages, and language-task combinations. Across extensive evaluations, we observe that no single model performs uniformly well across SEA languages; task difficulty differs markedly within languages, and success on one task does not reliably generalize to others. Language-task analyses further reveal highly non-uniform performance landscapes, where performance varies across different language-task combinations. These findings call for closer attention to performance measurements that provide an expansive view across languages and tasks to uncover inconsistencies in semantic representation. Based on these observations, we provide insights for future model development, including data, algorithmic, and architectural considerations.

Abstract:
Natural language to SQL (NL2SQL) provides an intuitive interface for querying structured data, yet real user questions are often noisy, ambiguous, and weakly grounded to database semantics.As a result, token-level schema linking and single-pass SQL decoding can be brittle: small misunderstandings in language or schema grounding may propagate into incorrect generation.We present QBridge , an agentic, feedback-driven NL2SQL framework based on a Refined Gold Query Paradigm , which bridges natural language and SQL via Gold Query —a structured, SQL-aligned intermediate representation.A core insight of QBridge is Distilled Back-Translation (DBT) for SL-independent rewriting.DBT converts SQL-grounded supervision into execution-verified Gold-Query-style rewrites from a teacher model, and distills a lightweight, plug-and-play rewriter that generates schema-aware rewrites without requiring explicit schema linking at inference. QBridge then (i) verifies and conservatively refines the rewrite into a high-fidelity Refined Gold Query , and (ii) refines the generated SQL with dual feedback from execution validity and semantic consistency, enabling interpretable self-correction while remaining compatible with diverse SQL backbones.Extensive experiments on Spider, BIRD, and three robustness variants demonstrate that QBridge consistently improves zero-shot NL2SQL, outperforming strong prompting and agentic baselines while showing strong robustness and generalization. Code and data are available at https://github.com/WannaBSteve/QBridge .

Abstract:
Recent advances in unified multimodal models indicate a clear trend towards comprehensive content generation. However, the auditory domain remains a significant challenge, with music and speech often developed in isolation, hindering progress towards universal audio synthesis. This separation stems from inherent task conflicts between semantic speech and structural music modeling, and severe data imbalances, which impede the development of a truly unified model. To address these challenges, we propose UniMoE-Audio, a unified speech and music generation model built upon a novel Dynamic-Capacity Mix-of-Experts (DCMoE) framework. Architecturally, UniMoE-Audio extends the conventional MoE paradigm by introducing a Top- P routing strategy for adaptive capacity allocation. To tackle data imbalance, we introduce a three-stage training curriculum: 1) Independent Specialist Training leverages original datasets to instill domain-specific knowledge into each specialists without interference; 2) MoE Integration and Warmup incorporates these specialists into the UniMoE-Audio architecture, warming up the gate module and shared expert using a subset of balanced dataset; and 3) Synergistic Joint Training trains the entire model end-to-end on the fully balanced dataset, fostering enhanced cross-domain synergy. Extensive experiments show that UniMoE-Audio not only achieves state-of-the-art performance on major speech and music generation benchmarks, but also demonstrates superior synergistic learning, mitigating the performance degradation typically seen in naive joint training. Our findings highlight the substantial potential of specialized MoE architecture and curated training strategies in advancing universal audio generation.

Abstract:
Cross-view spatial reasoning is essential for embodied AI, underpinning spatial understanding, mental simulation and planning in complex environments. Existing benchmarks primarily emphasize indoor or street settings, overlooking the unique challenges of open-ended urban spaces characterized by rich semantics, complex geometries, and view variations. To address this, we introduce CityCube, a systematic benchmark designed to probe cross-view reasoning capabilities of current VLMs in urban settings. CityCube integrates four viewpoint dynamics to mimic camera movements and spans a wide spectrum of perspectives from multiple platforms, e.g., vehicles, drones and satellites. For a comprehensive assessment, it features 5,022 meticulously annotated multi-view QA pairs categorized into five cognitive dimensions and three spatial relation expressions. A comprehensive evaluation of 33 VLMs reveals a significant performance disparity with humans: even large-scale models struggle to exceed 54.1% accuracy, remaining 34.2% below human performance. By contrast, small-scale fine-tuned VLMs achieve over 60.0% accuracy, highlighting the necessity of our benchmark. Further analyses indicate the task correlations and fundamental cognitive disparity between VLMs and human-like reasoning.

Abstract:
Post-training data plays a pivotal role in shaping the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet datasets are often treated as isolated artifacts, overlooking the systemic connections that underlie their evolution. To disentangle these complex relationships, we introduce the concept of data lineage to the LLM ecosystem and propose an automated multi-agent framework to reconstruct the evolutionary graph of dataset development. Through large-scale lineage analysis, we characterize domain-specific structural patterns, such as vertical refinement in Math-oriented datasets and horizontal aggregation in General-domain corpora. Moreover, we uncover pervasive systemic issues, including structural redundancy induced by implicit dataset intersections and the propagation of benchmark contamination along lineage paths. To demonstrate the practical value of lineage analysis for data construction, we leverage the reconstructed lineage graph to create a lineage-aware diversity-oriented dataset . By anchoring instruction sampling at upstream leaf sources, this approach mitigates downstream homogenization and hidden redundancy, yielding a more diverse post-training corpus. We further highlight lineage-centric analysis as an efficient and robust topological alternative to sample-level dataset comparison for large-scale data ecosystems. By grounding data construction in explicit lineage structures, our work advances post-training data curation toward a more systematic and controllable paradigm.

Abstract:
Language models perform well on grammatical agreement, but it is unclear whether this reflects rule-based generalization or memorization. We study this question for German definite singular articles, whose forms depend on gender and case. Using GRADIEND, a gradient-based interpretability method, we learn parameter update directions for gender-case specific article transitions. We find that updates learned for a specific gender-case article transition frequently affect unrelated gender-case settings, with substantial overlap among the most affected neurons across settings. These results argue against a strictly rule-based encoding of German definite articles, indicating that models at least partly rely on memorized associations rather than abstract grammatical rules.

Abstract:
Acquiring high-quality instruction-code pairs is essential for training Large Language Models for code generation. While automated synthesis has emerged as an alternative to expensive manual curation, current approaches often rely on rigid heuristics, yielding data that is ungrounded or lacks logical complexity. We propose CodeEvo, a dual-agent architecture comprising a Coder for iterative solution synthesis and a Reviewer to orchestrate the generation trajectory. To transcend the limitations of existing heuristics, the Reviewer formulates a Schema to systematically architect logic and complexity through an interleaved synthesis of instructions and code. This process is further reinforced by a hybrid verification protocol synergizing deterministic compiler feedback with semantic evaluation. Under this framework, we construct CodeEvo-100K, a large-scale dataset of instruction–code pairs with stepped difficulty levels. Extensive experiments demonstrate that models fine-tuned on CodeEvo data significantly outperform established baselines across code generation benchmarks. In-depth analyses further provide insights into effective code-centric data synthesis. Code and data are available at https://github.com/QiushiSun/CodeEvo .

Abstract:
Machine unlearning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) aims to remove specific concepts while preserving overall utility. However, existing approaches focus primarily on general utility metrics, overlooking the preservation of semantically related concepts. We present the first systematic analysis of this proximal collateral damage, revealing that forgetting vulnerability correlates strongly with visual embedding similarity in a smooth gradient across the semantic space. Based on this insight, we propose a novel unlearning framework that introduces Self-Generated Proximal Visual Tokens (SGPVTs), which are synthetically perturbed visual representations around the target concept. Our method employs an adaptive cosine-band curriculum with a dual-stream objective: forgetting the target via gradient ascent while distilling knowledge from a frozen teacher model into proximal tokens to prevent degradation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing methods in preserving semantically related concepts while achieving effective target unlearning, eliminating the need for manual retention set curation. Our source code will be released in the near future.

Abstract:
Puns are a common form of rhetorical wordplay that exploits polysemy and phonetic similarity to create humor. In multimodal puns, visual and textual elements synergize to ground the literal sense and evoke the figurative meaning simultaneously. Although Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are widely used in multimodal understanding and generation, their ability to understand puns has not been systematically studied due to a scarcity of rigorous benchmarks. To address this, we first propose a multimodal pun generation pipeline. We then introduce MultiPun, a dataset comprising diverse types of puns alongside adversarial non-pun distractors. Our evaluation reveals that most models struggle to distinguish genuine puns from these distractors. Moreover, we propose both prompt-level and model-level strategies to enhance pun comprehension, with an average improvement of 16.5% in F1 scores. Our findings provide valuable insights for developing future VLMs that master the subtleties of human-like humor via cross-modal reasoning.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs), have shown strong potential in scientific discovery, yet existing methods still face substantial challenges in the design of research workflows and multi-role collaboration mechanisms. To mitigate these issues, we propose EvoSci, a multi-agent scientific collaboration framework, which integrates bio-inspired evolution with knowledge graph modeling. To iteratively generate, evaluate, and refine research ideas, EvoSci incorporates multiple role-based agents, including mentor, researcher, and reviewer. By combining collaborative reasoning, shared memory, and evolutionary feedback, EvoSci significantly enhances the coherence and creativity of scientific exploration. Experiments on real-world research topics demonstrate that EvoSci significantly outperforms strong baselines in LLM-based structured peer-review and comparative ranking evaluations, achieving the highest overall peer-review score (ICLR 4.90) and top ranking (Top-10 = 54). These results suggest its superiority in both scientific idea generation and continuous discovery.

Abstract:
Although speculative decoding is widely used to accelerate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) inference, it faces severe performance collapse when applied to Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs). The draft model typically falls into the trap of attention dilution and negative visual gain due to key-value cache explosion and context window mismatches. We observe a visual semantic internalization phenomenon in Vid-LLMs, indicating that critical visual semantics are implicitly encoded into text hidden states during deep-layer interactions, which renders raw visual inputs structurally redundant during deep inference. To address this, we propose the Sparrow framework, which first utilizes visually-aware text-anchored window attention via hidden state reuse to fully offload visual computation to the target model, and leverages intermediate-layer visual state bridging to train the draft model with semantic-rich intermediate states, thereby filtering out low-level visual noise. Additionally, a multi-token prediction strategy is introduced to bridge the training-inference distribution shift. Experiments show that Sparrow achieves an average speedup of 2.82x even with 25k visual tokens, effectively resolving the performance degradation in long sequences and offering a practical solution for real-time long video tasks.

Abstract:
Although Knowledge Editing provides an efficient mechanism for updating the knowledge of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), we find that current paradigms still suffer from an important yet remain underexplored issue : editing decoupling failure, where entity-related knowledge can be updated when the model is triggered by multimodal inputs (text–image query pairs), however, it often reverts to outdated pre-edit facts when the paired inputs are split into unimodal ones. Our in-depth empirical analysis reveals that the entity knowledge in MLLMs is not stored as a unified representation, but is instead distributed across disentangled modality-specific pathways. As a result, updates biased toward multimodal queries fail to propagate effectively to unimodal circuits. To bridge this gap, we propose DECODE, which explicitly disentangles and localizes modality-specific neuron groups for targeted knowledge. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DECODE consistently achieves effective knowledge updates under different modality triggers, thereby mitigating editing decoupling failures.

Abstract:
In isolating languages such as Vietnamese, core morphological structure is encoded not by inflection but by the composition and ordering of monosyllabic morphemes, yet standard Transformer encoders largely overlook this signal. We introduce HuTieuBERT, a morpheme-aware Transformer that augments a pretrained Vietnamese encoder with two lightweight inductive biases: (i) Adaptive Boundary-Token Fusion, which integrates BMES-based morpheme boundary embeddings into token representations via a learnable gate, and (ii) a Morpheme-Aware Attention Bias, which injects a fixed structural attention matrix into early self-attention layers while minimally perturbing the pretrained attention geometry. Across a suite of Vietnamese POS, NER, and sentence-level classification benchmarks, HuTieuBERT consistently outperforms strong baselines, with the largest gains on syntactic tasks. Hyperparameter ablations show a broad regime in which structural biases improve accuracy without destabilizing representations. Applying the same design to ChineseBERT (Chinese-BERT-wwm) yields MAChineseBERT, which improves F 1 and produces more balanced tag distributions on Chinese POS and NER, suggesting that explicit morpheme-aware attention is a portable and effective strategy for modeling isolating languages.

Abstract:
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is fundamental to adapting large language models, yet training on complete datasets incurs prohibitive costs with diminishing returns. Existing data selection methods suffer from severe domain specificity: techniques optimized for general instruction-following fail on reasoning tasks, and vice versa. We observe that measuring contrastive entropy between base models and minimally instruction-tuned calibrated models reveals a pattern—samples with the lowest contrastive entropy consistently yield optimal performance across domains, yet this principle manifests domain-adaptively: reasoning tasks favor entropy increase (cognitive expansion), while general tasks favor entropy decrease (cognitive compression). We introduce InstructDiff, a unified framework that operationalizes contrastive entropy as a domain-adaptive selection criterion through warmup calibration, bi-directional NLL filtering, and entropy-based ranking. Extensive experiments show that InstructDiff achieves 17% relative improvement over full data training on mathematical reasoning and 52% for general instruction-following, outperforming prior baselines while using only 10% of the data.

Abstract:
We introduce RFC-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models on financial misinformation under realistic news. RFC-Bench operates at the paragraph level and captures the contextual complexity of financial news where meaning emerges from dispersed cues. The benchmark defines two complementary tasks: reference-free misinformation detection and comparison-based diagnosis using paired original–perturbed inputs. Experiments reveal a consistent pattern: performance is substantially stronger when comparative context is available, while reference-free settings expose significant weaknesses, including unstable predictions and elevated invalid outputs. These results indicate that current models struggle to maintain coherent belief states without external grounding. By highlighting this gap, RFC-Bench provides a structured testbed for studying reference-free reasoning and advancing more reliable financial misinformation detection in real-world settings.

Abstract:
Surveys provide valuable insights into public opinion and behavior, but their execution is costly and slow. Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as a scalable, low-cost substitute for human respondents, but their outputs are often biased and yield invalid estimates. We study the interplay between synthesis methods that use LLMs to generate survey responses and rectification methods that debias population estimates, and explore how human responses are best allocated between them. Using two panel surveys with questions on nutrition, politics, and economics, we find that synthesis alone introduces substantial bias (24–86%), whereas combining it with rectification reduces bias below 5% and increases effective sample size by up to 14%. Overall, we challenge the common practice of using all human responses for fine-tuning, showing that under a fixed budget, allocating most to rectification results in far more effective estimation.

Abstract:
Supervised post-training is essential for refining Large Language Models (LLMs), yet its effectiveness relies heavily on strategic data curation. Traditional Curriculum Learning (CL) strategies often fail to account for the evolving proficiency of the learner, relying instead on static, single dimensional metrics. We propose EVO-Curate, a dynamic data curation framework that synchronizes sample complexity with the maturing capacity of the LLM. EVO-Curate employs an Adaptive Dynamics Measurer to synthesize instantaneous difficulty and historical variability into a multidimensional utility score. To maintain representational diversity, we introduce an Evolutionary Sampling Scheduler based on an entropy maximizing mechanism. Empirical evaluations across instruction following, mathematical reasoning, and code generation demonstrate that EVO-Curate consistently outperforms standard training baselines and traditional CL methods across various architectures and scales. Specifically, our framework achieves relative performance gains of up to about 10% while maintaining manageable computational overhead. These results establish EVO-Curate as a scalable and model agnostic solution for enhancing the efficiency of modern LLM training pipelines.

Abstract:
Code retrieval is vital to modern software engineering as it boosts reuse and speeds up debugging. However, current benchmarks primarily emphasize functional relevance while neglecting code quality. To address this gap, we introduce CoQuIR, the first large-scale, multilingual benchmark specifically designed to evaluate quality-aware code retrieval across four critical dimensions: correctness, efficiency, security, and maintainability. CoQuIR includes fine-grained quality annotations over 42,725 queries and 134,907 code snippets in 11 programming languages. Evaluating 23 retrievers (both open-source and proprietary) shows that even state-of-the-art models often fail to separate buggy or insecure code from robust counterparts. We further investigate methods for explicitly training retrievers to recognize code quality, demonstrating that quality-aware metrics can be improved without loss of semantic relevance; downstream code generation benefits from these gains. CoQuIR underscores the importance of embedding quality signals into retrieval systems as a crucial component for more trustworthy developer tools.

Abstract:
LLMs can solve complex tasks by generating long, multi-step reasoning chains. Test-time scaling (TTS) can further improve LLM performance by sampling multiple variants of intermediate reasoning steps, verifying their correctness, and strategically choosing the best steps for continuation. However, existing verification approaches, such as Process Reward Models (PRMs), are computationally expensive, limited to specific domains, and require large-scale human or model-generated annotations. We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on probing the internal states of LLMs. We train a transformer-based probe that uses the internal states of the frozen LLM to estimate the credibility of its reasoning steps during generation. Annotation can be generated either by another larger LLM (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) or in a self-supervised manner by the original model itself. The probes are both effective and lightweight, containing fewer than 10M parameters. Across multiple domains, including mathematics, planning, and general knowledge question answering, our probes match or even exceed the performance of PRMs that are up to 810× larger. Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their confidence in reasoning processes and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning step verification, offering a promising direction towards scalable and generalizable TTS and introspective LLMs.

Abstract:
The rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed fake news detection and fact-checking tasks from simple classification to complex reasoning. However, evaluation frameworks have not kept pace. Current benchmarks are static, making them vulnerable to benchmark data contamination (BDC) and ineffective at assessing reasoning under temporal uncertainty. To address this, we introduce LiveFact a continuously updated benchmark that simulates the real-world "fog of war" in misinformation detection. LiveFact uses dynamic, temporal evidence sets to evaluate models on their ability to reason with evolving, incomplete information rather than on memorized knowledge. We propose a dual-mode evaluation: Classification Mode for final verification and Inference Mode for evidence-based reasoning, along with a component to monitor BDC explicitly. Tests with 22 LLMs show that open-source Mixture-of-Experts models, such as Qwen3-235B-A22B, now match or outperform proprietary state-of-the-art systems. More importantly, our analysis finds a significant "reasoning gap." Capable models exhibit epistemic humility by recognizing unverifiable claims in early data slices-an aspect traditional static benchmarks overlook. LiveFact sets a sustainable standard for evaluating robust, temporally aware AI verification.

Abstract:
Reliable Large Language Models (LLMs) should abstain when confidence is insufficient. However, prior studies often treat refusal as a generic "I don’t know”, failing to distinguish input-level ambiguity (data uncertainty) from capability limitations (model uncertainty). This lack of distinction limits downstream action decisions like requesting clarification or invoking external tools.In this work, we introduce UA-Bench, a benchmark of over 3,500 questions drawn from six datasets spanning knowledge-intensive and reasoning-intensive tasks, designed to evaluate explicit uncertainty attribution.An evaluation of 18 frontier LLMs shows that even state-of-the-art models struggle to reliably discriminate between data uncertainty and model uncertainty, and that high answer accuracy does not necessarily imply strong uncertainty attribution ability.To narrow this gap, we propose a lightweight data synthesis and reinforcement learning strategy. Experiments on both Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3-8B in thinking mode show that the proposed method improves uncertainty attribution while preserving answer accuracy.Our code and data are publicly available now.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models ( e.g., R1, o3) have demonstrated remarkable mathematical problem-solving abilities. However, the high reported accuracy of these advanced models on popular datasets and reliance on purely numerical evaluation often mask their true reasoning shortcomings. To address this, we propose leveraging the inherent rigor and methodological complexity of mathematical proofs as a diagnostic tool to expose these hidden failures. Specifically, we introduce the RFMDataset (Reveal Failure Modes), a collection of 200 diverse mathematical proof problems to thoroughly evaluate the performance of advanced models. Our in-depth analysis of their failures uncovers 10 fine-grained error types, which shows fundamental limitations in current large reasoning models: 1) Large reasoning models still have limited capability in generating entirely correct mathematical proofs, with some models solving less than 20% of problems and even making mistakes on fundamental ones; 2) models exhibit a diverse spectrum of reasoning failures, prominently demonstrating the lack of guarantees for the correctness and rigor intermediate reasoning steps; and 3) models show hallucination and incompleteness during the reasoning process. Our findings also reveal that directly prompting models to self-reflect on specific failure modes is insufficient to resolve the current logical dilemmas, necessitating domain knowledge and formal verification.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of NLP tasks, but they remain fundamentally stateless, constrained by limited context windows that hinder long-horizon reasoning. Recent efforts to address this limitation often augment LLMs with an external memory bank, yet most existing pipelines are static and heuristic-driven, lacking a learned mechanism for deciding what to store, update, or retrieve. We present Memory-R1, a reinforcement learning (RL) framework that equips LLMs with the ability to actively manage and utilize external memory through two specialized agents: a Memory Manager that learns structured operations, including ADD, UPDATE, DELETE, and NOOP; and an Answer Agent that pre-selects and reasons over relevant entries. Both agents are fine-tuned with outcome-driven RL (PPO and GRPO), enabling adaptive memory management with minimal supervision. With only 152 training QA pairs, Memory-R1 outperforms strong baselines and generalizes across diverse question types, three benchmarks (LoCoMo, MSC, LongMemEval), and multiple model scales (3B–14B).

Abstract:
We investigate the degree to which human (and LLM) plausibility judgments of multiple-choice commonsense benchmark answers are subject to influence by (im)plausibility arguments for or against an answer, in particular, using rationales generated by LLMs. We collect 3,000 plausibility judgments from humans and another 13,600 judgments from LLMs. Overall, we observe increases and decreases in mean human plausibility ratings in the presence of LLM-generated PRO and CON rationales, respectively, suggesting that, on the whole, human judges find these rationales convincing. Experiments with LLMs reveal similar patterns of influence. Our findings demonstrate a novel use of LLMs for studying aspects of human cognition, while also raising practical concerns that, even in domains where humans are “experts” (i.e., common sense), LLMs have the potential to exert considerable influence on people’s beliefs.

Abstract:
Long-video understanding is bottlenecked by the high cost of processing massive visual tokens. Current reduction strategies often rely on static allocation or inefficient in-network selection that disrupts optimized attention kernels. In this paper, we introduce Vista-LLM, a decoupled framework for query-guided visual token pruning. By filtering redundancy prior to inference with minimal overhead, Vista-LLM ensures full compatibility with Flash Attention. Our method employs a coarse-to-fine pipeline: (1) Query-Guided Dynamic Budgeting for adaptive temporal allocation; (2) a lightweight Semantic Scout for fine-grained, query-specific selection; and (3) Structure-Aware Compensation to preserve global context. Extensive experiments on benchmarks like Video-MME and MLVU demonstrate a significantly improved Pareto frontier. Notably, on LLaVA-OneVision, Vista-LLM reduces visual tokens by 90% and accelerates inference while retaining over 98% of baseline performance on average, effectively filtering visual noise.

Abstract:
The most recent research uses reinforcement learning (RL) to post-train Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) such that these models are able to iteratively call search engines to dynamically access external knowledge when handling complex Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks. However, existing methods face two major limitations in effectiveness and efficiency: i) For effectiveness, the objective of these methods, which only considers the correctness of the generated final response, overlooks the quality of intermediate search results, thus leading to suboptimal search strategies. ii) For efficiency, existing methods often unnecessarily invoke search calls during reasoning, making the inference inefficient. To address these issues, we propose , a customized dual-objective reinforcement learning framework to improve the search strategies of MLLMs, enhancing their search quality yet minimizing search frequency. The key ideas include (1) a reward function that promotes correct reasoning trajectories with fewer search calls; and (2) dual optimization objectives that jointly optimize search quality and answer correctness. Extensive experiments on 3 real-world datasets demonstrate that DORA outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 8.4% higher accuracy while reducing the number of search calls by 9.7%.

Abstract:
The standard post-training recipe for large reasoning models, supervised fine-tuning followed by reinforcement learning (SFT-then-RL), may limit the benefits of the RL stage: while SFT imitates expert demonstrations, it often causes overconfidence and reduces generation diversity, leaving RL with a narrowed solution space to explore. Adding entropy regularization during SFT is not a cure-all; it tends to flatten token distributions toward uniformity, increasing entropy without improving meaningful exploration capability. In this paper, we propose CurioSFT, an entropy-preserving SFT method designed to enhance exploration capabilities through intrinsic curiosity. It consists of (a) Self-Exploratory Distillation, which distills the model toward a self-generated, temperature-scaled teacher to encourage exploration within its capability; and (b) Entropy-Guided Temperature Selection, which adaptively adjusts distillation strength to mitigate knowledge forgetting by amplifying exploration at reasoning tokens while stabilizing factual tokens. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning tasks demonstrate that, in SFT stage, CurioSFT outperforms the vanilla SFT by 2.5 points on in-distribution tasks and 2.9 points on out-of-distribution tasks. We also verify that exploration capabilities preserved during SFT successfully translate into concrete gains in RL stage, yielding an average improvement of 5.0 points. Code is available at https://github.com/HaoooWang/CurioSFT.

Abstract:
In response to the increasing demand for largescale machine learning training jobs, many organizations have deployed GPU clusters across geographically distributed regions. However, existing ILP- or genetic-based cross-cluster training approaches largely overlook the topology of decentralized clusters, lacking both topologyaware task scheduling mechanisms and automated model parallelization strategies. As a result, naively applying these optimization-based methods in cross-cluster settings leads to prohibitive scheduling overhead, due to the drastically enlarged search space induced by complex inter-cluster topologies. To address these challenges, we propose SpiderFlow, a topologyaware scheduling system specifically designed for decentralized GPU clusters. We formulate cross-cluster task scheduling as a graph optimization problem and introduce SpinSearch, a low-overhead topology-aware scheduling algorithm. In addition, for automated model parallelization, we propose TPA, a two-level scheduling framework that combines heuristic methods at the inter-cluster level with ILP-based optimization within clusters, effectively reducing the search space while maintaining high training throughput with substantially lower scheduling overhead. We evaluate SpiderFlow on a physical platform comprising 8 decentralized clusters, as well as on a simulation platform with up to 64 decentralized clusters. Experimental results demonstrate that SpiderFlow reduces job completion time (JCT) by 1.2-1.3×, improves throughput by 1.12-1.25×, and reduces scheduling overhead by 20-90× on average compared to state-of-the-art scheduling systems.

Abstract:
Code LLMs still struggle with code execution reasoning, especially in smaller models. Existing methods rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with teacher-generated explanations, primarily in two forms: (1) input–output (I/O) prediction chains and (2) natural-language descriptions of execution traces. However, intermediate execution steps cannot be explicitly verified during SFT, so the training objective can reduce to merely matching teacher explanations. Moreover, training data is typically collected without explicit control over task difficulty. We introduce ExecVerify, which goes beyond text imitation by incorporating verifiable white-box rewards derived from execution traces, including next-statement prediction and variable value/type prediction. Our work first builds a dataset with multiple difficulty levels via constraint-based program synthesis. Then, we apply reinforcement learning (RL) to reward correct answers about both intermediate execution steps and final outputs, aligning the training objective with semantic correctness at each execution step. Finally, we adopt a two-stage training pipeline that first enhances execution reasoning and then transfers to code generation. Experiments demonstrate that a 7B model trained with ExecVerify achieves performance comparable to 32B models on code reasoning benchmarks and improves pass@1 by up to 5.9% on code generation tasks over strong post-training baselines.

Abstract:
Tokenization is the first step in every language model (LM), yet it never takes the sounds of words into account. We investigate how tokenization influences text-only LMs’ ability to represent phonological knowledge. Through a series of probing experiments, we show that subword-based tokenization systematically weakens the encoding of both local (e.g., rhyme) and global (e.g., syllabification) phonological features. To quantify this effect, we introduce the syllabification-tokenization alignment distance (STAD), a metric that measures the misalignment between a model’s tokenization and the natural syllable boundaries of words, and find that higher misalignment correlates with poorer phonological representations, providing a simple diagnostic for phonology-aware tokenization. To address these limitations, we propose a lightweight IPA-based fine-tuning method that infuses phonological awareness into LMs, leading to consistent improvements across three phonology-related tasks while largely preserving math and general reasoning ability, with 1.1% and 0.9% drops on GSM8K and MMLU, respectively.[Our code is available at ]

Abstract:
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into clinical decision support is critically obstructed by their opaque and often unreliable reasoning. In the high-stakes domain of healthcare, correct answers alone are insufficient; clinical practice demands full transparency to ensure patient safety and enable professional accountability. A pervasive and dangerous weakness of current LLMs is their tendency to produce "correct answers through flawed reasoning." This issue is far more than a minor academic flaw; such process errors signal a fundamental lack of robust understanding, making the model prone to broader hallucinations and unpredictable failures when faced with real-world clinical complexity. In this paper, we establish a framework for trustworthy clinical argumentation by adapting the Toulmin model to the diagnostic process. We propose a novel training pipeline: Curriculum Goal-Conditioned Learning (CGCL), designed to progressively train LLM to generate diagnostic arguments that explicitly follow this Toulmin structure. CGCL’s progressive three-stage curriculum systematically builds a solid clinical argument: (1) extracting facts and generating differential diagnoses; (2) justifying a core hypothesis while rebutting alternatives; and (3) synthesizing the analysis into a final, qualified conclusion. We validate CGCL using T-Eval, a quantitative framework measuring the integrity of the diagnosis reasoning. Experiments show that our method achieves diagnostic accuracy and reasoning quality comparable to resource-intensive Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods, while offering a more stable and efficient training pipeline.

Abstract:
This paper presents the first end-to-end pipeline for Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) for Old Nepali, a historically significant but low-resource language. We adopt a line-level transcription approach and systematically explore encoder-decoder architectures and data-centric techniques to improve recognition accuracy. Our best model achieves a Character Error Rate (CER) of 4.9%. In addition, we implement and evaluate decoding strategies and analyze token-level confusions to better understand model behavior and error patterns. Although the evaluation dataset is confidential, we release our training code, model configurations, and evaluation scripts to support further research on HTR for low-resource historical scripts.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance and rapid progress in a wide range of medical reasoning tasks.However, their sequential autoregressive decoding forces inherently parallel clinical reasoning, such as differential diagnosis, into a single linear reasoning path, limiting both efficiency and reliability for complex medical problems.To address this, we propose MedVerse, a reasoning framework for complex medical inference that reformulates medical reasoning as a parallelizable directed acyclic graph (DAG) process based on Petri Net theory.The framework adopts a full-stack design across data, model architecture, and system execution.For data creation, we introduce the MedVerse Curator, an automated pipeline that synthesizes knowledge-grounded medical reasoning path and transforms them into Petri Net–structured representations.At the architectural level, we propose a topology-aware attention mechanism with adaptive position indices that supports parallel reasoning while preserving logical consistency.Systematically, we develop a customized inference engine that supports parallel execution without additional overhead.Empirical evaluations show that MedVerse improves strong general-purpose LLMs by up to 8.9%. Compared to specialized medical LLMs, MedVerse achieves comparable performance with improved clinical reliability, while delivering a 1.3 × reduction in inference latency and a 1.7 × increase in generation throughput, enabled by its parallel decoding capability.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show strong reasoning abilities but often produce unnecessarily long explanations that reduce efficiency. Although reinforcement learning (RL) has been used to improve reasoning, most methods focus on accuracy and rely on uniform length-based rewards that overlook the differing contributions of individual tokens, often harming correctness. We revisit length optimization in RL through the perspective of token significance. Observing that many chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens contribute little to the final answer, we introduce a significance-aware length reward that selectively penalizes insignificance tokens, reducing redundancy while preserving essential reasoning. We also propose a dynamic length reward that encourages more detailed reasoning early in training and gradually shifts toward conciseness as learning progresses. Integrating these components into standard policy optimization yields a framework that improves both reasoning efficiency and accuracy. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate substantial reductions in response length while preserving or improving correctness, highlighting the importance of modeling token significance for efficient LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Evaluating recommender systems remains challenging due to the gap between offline metrics and real user behavior, as well as the scarcity of interaction data. Recent work explores large language model (LLM) agents as synthetic users, yet they typically rely on few-shot prompting, which yields a shallow understanding of the environment and limits their ability to faithfully reproduce user actions. We introduce AlignUSER, a framework that learns world-model-driven agents from human interactions. Given rollout sequences of actions and states, we formalize world modeling as a next state prediction task that helps the agent internalize the environment. To align actions with human personas, we generate counterfactual trajectories around demonstrations and prompt the LLM to compare its decisions with human choices, identify suboptimal actions, and extract lessons. The learned policy is then used to drive agent interactions with the recommender system. We evaluate AlignUSER across multiple datasets and demonstrate closer alignment with genuine humans than prior work, both at the micro and macro levels.

Abstract:
Large language models still struggle with reliable long-term conversational memory: simply enlarging context windows or applying naïve retrieval often introduces noise and destabilizes responses. We present APEX-MEM, a conversational memory system that combines three key innovations: (1) a property graph which use domain-agnostic ontology to structure conversations as temporally grounded events in an entity-centric framework, (2) append-only storage that preserves the full temporal evolution of information, and (3) a multi-tool retrieval agent that understands and resolves conflicting or evolving information at query time, producing a compact and contextually relevant memory summary. This retrieval-time resolution preserves the full interaction history while suppressing irrelevant details. APEX-MEM achieves 88.88% accuracy on LOCOMO and 86.2% on LongMemEval, outperforming state-of-the-art session-aware approaches and demonstrating that structured property graphs enable more temporally coherent long-term conversational reasoning.

Abstract:
Psychological research has long utilized circumplex models to structure emotions, placing similar emotions adjacently and opposing ones diagonally. Although frequently used to interpret deep learning representations, these models are rarely directly incorporated into the representation learning of language models, leaving their geometric validity unexplored. This paper proposes a method to induce circular emotion representations within language model embeddings via contrastive learning on a hypersphere. We show that while this circular alignment offers superior interpretability and robustness against dimensionality reduction, it underperforms compared to conventional designs in high-dimensional settings and fine-grained classification. Our findings elucidate the trade-offs involved in applying psychological circumplex models to deep learning architectures.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models often struggle with faithful reasoning in complex visual scenes, where intricate entities and relations require precise visual grounding at each step. This reasoning unfaithfulness frequently manifests as hallucinated entities, mis-grounded relations, skipped steps, and over-specified reasoning. Existing preference-based approaches, typically relying on textual perturbations or answer-conditioned rationales, fail to address this challenge as they allow models to exploit language priors to bypass visual grounding. To address this, we propose SceneAlign, a framework that leverages scene graphs as structured visual information to perform controllable structural interventions. By identifying reasoning-critical nodes and perturbing them through four targeted strategies that mimic typical grounding failures, SceneAlign constructs hard negative rationales that remain linguistically plausible but are grounded in inaccurate visual facts. These contrastive pairs are used in Direct Preference Optimization to steer models toward fine-grained, structure-faithful reasoning. Across seven visual reasoning benchmarks, SceneAlign consistently improves answer accuracy and reasoning faithfulness, highlighting the effectiveness of grounding-aware alignment for multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
Unsupervised reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling self-improvement in large language models (LLMs). However, existing unsupervised RL-based methods often lack the capacity to adapt to the model’s evolving reasoning capabilities during training. Therefore, these methods can misdirect policy optimization in the absence of ground-truth supervision. To address this issue, we introduce FREIA, a novel RL-based algorithm built on two key innovations: (1) Free Energy-Driven Reward (FER) adapts rewards to balance consensus and exploration based on the Free Energy Principle. (2) Adaptive Advantage Shaping (AAS) adaptively adjusts learning signals based on the statistical characteristics of sampled rewards. Empirical evaluations on nine datasets across three reasoning tasks showcase that FREIA outperforms other unsupervised RL-based baselines. Notably, in mathematical reasoning tasks, FREIA surpasses other methods by an average of 0.5 to 3.5 points in Pass@1 using the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B model.

Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM)—the ability to infer mental states in others—is pivotal for human social cognition. Existing evaluations of ToM in LLMs are largely limited to English, neglecting the linguistic diversity that shapes human cognition. This limitation raises a critical question: can LLMs exhibit Multilingual Theory of Mind—the capacity to reason about mental states across diverse linguistic contexts? To address this gap, we present XToM, a rigorously validated multilingual benchmark that evaluates ToM across five languages and incorporates diverse, contextually rich task scenarios. Using XToM, we systematically evaluate LLMs (e.g., DeepSeek R1), revealing a pronounced dissonance: while models excel in multilingual language understanding, their ToM performance varies across languages. Our findings expose limitations in LLMs’ ability to replicate human-like mentalizing across linguistic contexts.

Abstract:
Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) plays a critical role in mental health assistance by providing accessible psychological support in real-world applications. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong empathetic abilities in ESC tasks. Yet, existing methods overlook the issue of cognitive distortions in help-seekers’ expressions. As a result, current models can only provide basic emotional comfort, rather than helping help-seekers address their psychological distress at a deeper cognitive level. To address this challenge, we construct the CogBiasESC dataset, the first dataset that expands existing ESC datasets by adding labels for cognitive distortions, includes their type, intensity, and safe risk level. Furthermore, we propose the Cognitive Policy-driven Large Language Model framework (CoPoLLM) to enhance LLMs’ ability to diagnose and intervene cognitive distortions in help-seekers. We also analyze the safety advantages of CoPoLLM from a theoretical perspective. Experimental results show that CoPoLLM significantly outperforms 15 state-of-the-art baselines in terms of distortion diagnosis accuracy, intervention strategy effectiveness, and safety risk control. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/Chips98/CoPoLLM-for-ACL-2026.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used to ground large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge and improve factual accuracy. Prior work has explored iterative and self-reflective mechanisms to refine reasoning, but these approaches rely on internal model judgment and lack formally grounded, verifiable feedback. As a result, RAG systems may still produce logically inconsistent or contradictory answers in multi-step reasoning. In this paper, we propose LCR-RAG, a framework that integrates neuro-symbolic verification with reinforcement learning to explicitly optimize logical consistency. The core of our approach is a Logic-Consistency-driven Reward (LCR), which converts discrete logical signals—such as contradictions or incomplete inference chains—into a structured reward signal. This reward guides a PPO-based agent to iteratively rewrite queries and correct reasoning errors. Experiments on HotpotQA, ASQA, and TriviaQA show that LCR-RAG consistently outperforms strong RAG baselines, with ablation results indicating that the LCR mechanism is the primary source of improvement, even under noisy or conflicting retrieval conditions.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance by externalizing explicit reasoning traces before producing the answer, yet suffer from overthinking challenge that allocates uniformly heavy computation to queries of varying difficulty. While proprietary models mitigate this via opaque routing, open-source LRMs still lack an efficient mechanism to internalize adaptive reasoning due to both expensive training cost and limited disclosure of training recipes. In response, we introduce RPO (Root-token Policy Optimization), a framework that enables LRMs to self-determine when to reason by training only the initial root token (e.g., whether to invoke the think tag) via group relative reward and group-wise advantages. By focusing on this pivotal branching point, RPO drastically reduces training overhead and VRAM usage. Across multiple model families and scales, RPO learns difficulty-aware adaptive thinking at just 2% of the training compute of prior adaptive-reasoning methods.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to impressive performance on a range of tasks, yet advanced instruction following (IF)—especially for complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instructions—remains a significant challenge. Rigorous evaluation and effective training for such capabilities are hindered by the lack of high-quality, human-annotated benchmarks and reliable, interpretable reward signals. In this work, we introduce AdvancedIF, a comprehensive benchmark featuring over 1,600 prompts and expert-curated rubrics that assess LLMs’ ability to follow complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. We also open-source the evaluation script of AdvancedIF. We further propose RIFL (Rubric-based Instruction-Following Learning), a novel post-training pipeline that leverages rubric generation, a finetuned rubric verifier, and reward shaping to enable effective reinforcement learning for instruction following. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RIFL substantially improves the instruction-following abilities of LLMs, achieving a 6.7% absolute gain on AdvancedIF and strong results on public benchmarks. Our ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of each component in RIFL. This work establishes rubrics as a powerful tool for both training and evaluating advanced IF in LLMs, paving the way for more capable and reliable AI systems.

Abstract:
Reasoning benchmarks such as the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) and ARC-AGI are widely used to assess progress in artificial intelligence and are often interpreted as probes of core, so-called “fluid” reasoning abilities. Despite their apparent simplicity for humans, these tasks remain challenging for frontier vision-language models (VLMs), a gap commonly attributed to deficiencies in machine reasoning. We challenge this interpretation and hypothesize that the gap arises primarily from limitations in visual perception rather than from shortcomings in inductive reasoning.To verify this hypothesis, we introduce a two-stage experimental pipeline that explicitly separates perception and reasoning. In the perception stage, each image is independently converted into a natural-language description, while in the reasoning stage a model induces and applies rules using these descriptions. This design prevents leakage of cross-image inductive signals and isolates reasoning from perception bottlenecks. Across three ARC-style datasets, Mini-ARC, ACRE, and Bongard-LOGO, we show that the perception capability is the dominant factor underlying the observed performance gap by comparing the two-stage pipeline with against standard end-to-end one-stage evaluation. Manual inspection of reasoning traces in the VLM outputs further reveals that approximately 80 percent of model failures stem from perception errors. Together, these results demonstrate that ARC-style benchmarks conflate perceptual and reasoning challenges and that observed performance gaps may overstate deficiencies in machine reasoning. Our findings underscore the need for evaluation protocols that disentangle perception from reasoning when assessing progress in machine intelligence.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in contexts requiring complex moral reasoning and value trade-offs. However, existing evaluations typically rely on item-level behavioral metrics, which fail to capture how models structurally prioritize competing values as a cohesive system. To address this, we propose a symmetric human-LLM evaluation framework, grounded in Q methodology, to measure value-structure alignment. Under our protocol, humans and models sort an identical 140-item moral statement set into a shared nine-column forced distribution; for LLMs, we elicit strict rankings and deterministically map them to Q-sort buckets. Using a human reference sample ( N=35 ), we establish a stable three-factor reference geometry specific to this instrument and sample. We evaluate 12 LLMs across four model families via 240 replicated Q-sorts at two temperature settings, quantifying structural alignment via Procrustes similarity ( 𝜙 ) and RSA-based Spearman correlation ( 𝜌 ). Our results reveal significant cross-family heterogeneity, model-specific sensitivity to generation stochasticity and localized misalignment, which demonstrate that favorable global scores can obscure underlying regional distortions. While rank- and bucket-based analyses remain highly consistent, prompt phrasing introduces notable variance. Ultimately, assessing value-structure alignment provides a crucial structural complement to traditional itemwise moral benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) rely on attention-based retrieval of safety instructions to maintain alignment during generation. Existing attacks typically optimize image perturbations to maximize harmful output likelihood, but suffer from slow convergence due to gradient conflict between adversarial objectives and the model’s safety-retrieval mechanism. We propose Attention-Guided Visual Jailbreaking, which circumvents rather than overpowers safety alignment by directly manipulating attention patterns. Our method introduces two simple auxiliary objectives: (1) suppressing attention to system-prompt tokens and (2) anchoring generation on adversarial image features. This simple yet effective push-pull formulation reduces gradient conflict by 45% and achieves 94.4% attack success rate on Qwen-VL (vs. 68.8% baseline) with 40% fewer iterations. At tighter perturbation budgets ( 𝜖=8/255 ), we maintain 59.0% ASR compared to 45.7% for standard methods. Mechanistic analysis reveals a failure mode we term safety blindness: successful attacks suppress system-prompt attention by 80%, causing models to generate harmful content not by overriding safety rules, but by failing to retrieve them.

Abstract:
Search agents have emerged as a pivotal paradigm for solving open-ended, knowledge-intensive reasoning tasks. However, training these agents via Reinforcement Learning (RL) faces a critical dilemma: interacting with live commercial Web APIs is prohibitively expensive, while relying on static data snapshots often introduces noise due to data misalignment. This misalignment generates corrupted reward signals that destabilize training by penalizing correct reasoning or rewarding hallucination. To address this, we propose SearchGym, a simulation environment designed to bootstrap robust search agents. SearchGym employs a rigorous generative pipeline to construct a verifiable knowledge graph and an aligned document corpus, ensuring that every reasoning task is factually grounded and strictly solvable. Building on this controllable environment, we introduce SearchGym-RL, a curriculum learning methodology that progressively optimizes agent policies through purified feedback, evolving from basic interactions to complex, long-horizon planning. Extensive experiments across the Llama and Qwen families demonstrate strong Sim-to-Real generalization. Notably, our Qwen2.5-7B-Base model trained within SearchGym surpasses the web-enhanced ASearcher baseline across nine diverse benchmarks by an average relative margin of 10.6%. Our results validate that high-fidelity simulation serves as a scalable and highly cost-effective methodology for developing capable search agents.

Abstract:
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have been widely applied in real-time scenarios, such as in-car assistants and online meeting comprehension. In practice, audio inputs are often corrupted by device and environmental noise, leading to performance degradation. However, existing LALM studies on noise lack quantitative analysis and rely mainly on intuition and empirical observation, thus failing to understand practical robustness. To address this issue, we introduce Signal Embedding Energy (SEE), a method for quantifying the impact of noise intensity on LALM inputs, enabling the differentiation of LALM robustness in real-world deployments. SEE introduces a perspective based on structured activation subspaces derived from the model’s internal representations, which more accurately captures its perception of noise than raw audio features. Across experiments, SEE exhibits a strong correlation with LALM performance, achieving a correlation of 0.98. Surprisingly, traditional audio denoising methods are only marginally effective for LALMs, and, in some cases, even increase SEE and impair performance. This suggests a mismatch between speech-centric denoising objectives and the noise sensitivity of modern LALMs. Therefore, we propose a mitigation strategy derived from SEE to denoise LALM inputs, outperforming existing denoising methods. This paper introduces a novel metric for noise quantification in LALMs, providing guidance for robustness improvements in real-world deployments.

Abstract:
Generalized Category Discovery (GCD) aims to classify data from partially labeled datasets by jointly recognizing known categories and discovering novel ones.Despite recent advances, existing methods still suffer from weak text–label alignment, inconsistent objectives across known and novel categories, and poor discrimination of semantically similar clusters. To mitigate these issues, we propose TLSA, a unified framework that enforces contrastive alignment between text and label representations within a shared semantic space. Specifically, we first design a label-semantic aware dual-encoder equipped with a symmetric contrastive objective to achieve text-label alignment. Then, we leverage LLM-based label induction to generate explicit and semantically meaningful names for previously unseen categories, followed by a graph-based refinement strategy that disambiguates semantically overlapping clusters through forced renaming. Finally, a confidence-aware sampling strategy ensures balanced learning across both easy and hard instances. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that TLSA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art GCD methods. The code is available at https://github.com/Wenxi-Xu/TLSA.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have driven major progress in NLP, yet their substantial memory and compute demands still hinder practical deployment. Binarization can compress weights to 1 bit, fundamentally lowering compute and bandwidth cost. However, existing methods cannot address activation heavy tails and thus must keep activations in high precision, preventing true end-to-end acceleration. To overcome this limitation, we propose BWLA, the first post-training quantization framework that preserves high accuracy while achieving 1-bit weight quantization together with low-bit activations (e.g., 6 bits). The Orthogonal-Kronecker Transformation (OKT) learns an orthogonal mapping via EM minimization, converting unimodal weights into symmetric bimodal forms while suppressing activation tails and incoherence. The Proximal SVD Projection (PSP) then performs lightweight low-rank refinement through proximal SVD projection, further enhancing quantizability with minimal overhead. On Qwen3-32B, BWLA reaches a Wikitext2 perplexity of 11.92 under 6-bit activations (vs. 38 from SOTA), improves five zero-shot tasks by more than 70%, and delivers 3.26× inference speedup, demonstrating strong potential for real-world LLM compression and acceleration. The code will be available at [BWLA](https://github.com/Kishon-zzx/BWLA).

Abstract:
Multi-document news summarisation systems are increasingly adopted for their convenience in processing vast daily news content, making fairness across diverse political perspectives critical. However, these systems can exhibit political bias through unequal representation of viewpoints, disproportionate emphasis on certain perspectives, and systematic underrepresentation of minority voices. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of such bias in multi-document news summarisation using FairNews, a dataset of complete news articles with political orientation labels, examining how large language models (LLMs) handle sources with varying political leanings across 13 models and five fairness metrics. We investigate both baseline model performance and effectiveness of various debiasing interventions, including prompt-based and judge-based approaches. Our findings challenge the assumption that larger models yield fairer outputs, as mid-sized variants consistently outperform their larger counterparts, offering the best balance of fairness and efficiency. Prompt-based debiasing proves highly model dependent, while entity sentiment emerges as the most stubborn fairness dimension, resisting all intervention strategies tested. These results demonstrate that fairness in multi-document news summarisation requires multi-dimensional evaluation frameworks and targeted, architecture-aware debiasing rather than simply scaling up.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often generate factually incorrect content, known as “hallucinations”, which undermine the reliability and safety of their outputs. Existing hallucination detection methods either depend on external knowledge sources, incurring high computational costs and limiting real-time applicability, or extract the model’s internal states, leading to poor generalization. To address these issues, this paper proposes ReFL, a hallucination detection framework. ReFL leverages corrective in-context learning to dynamically guide LLMs to recognize their own prediction errors and adjust internal representations, critically without updating model weights. Specifically, by introducing a corrective in-context learning strategy, where triplets of input text, model prediction, and ground-truth label are embedded into the prompt to make the model explicitly aware of its own errors. The model reflects on prior outputs to adjust its internal states and generate semantically structured representations better aligned with factuality. This feedback mechanism encourages the model to shape a more coherent semantic space and enhances the LLM’s internal sensitivity to hallucinations. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that ReFL consistently outperforms existing methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Automated medical report generation for 3D PET/CT imaging is fundamentally challenged by the high-dimensional nature of volumetric data and a critical scarcity of annotated datasets, particularly for low-resource languages. Current black-box methods map whole volumes to reports, ignoring the clinical workflow of analyzing localized Regions of Interest (RoIs) to derive diagnostic conclusions. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing VietPET-RoI, the first large-scale 3D PET/CT dataset with fine-grained RoI annotation for a low-resource language, comprising 600 PET/CT samples and 1,960 manually annotated RoIs, paired with corresponding clinical reports. Furthermore, to demonstrate the utility of this dataset, we propose HiRRA, a novel framework that mimics the professional radiologist diagnostic workflow by employing graph-based relational modules to capture dependencies between RoI attributes. This approach shifts from global pattern matching toward localized clinical findings. Additionally, we introduce new clinical evaluation metrics, namely RoI Coverage and RoI Quality Index, that measure both RoI localization accuracy and attribute description fidelity using LLM-based extraction. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our framework achieves SOTA performance, surpassing existing models by 19.7% in BLEU and 4.7% in ROUGE-L, while achieving a remarkable 45.8% improvement in clinical metrics, indicating enhanced clinical reliability and reduced hallucination. Our code and dataset are available on GitHub.

Abstract:
Failure attribution, i.e., identifying the responsible agent and decisive step of a failure, is particularly challenging in LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) due to their natural-language reasoning, nondeterministic outputs, and intricate interaction dynamics. A reliable benchmark is therefore essential to guide and evaluate attribution techniques. Yet existing benchmarks rely on partially observable traces that capture only agent outputs, omitting the inputs and context that developers actually use when debugging. We argue that attribution should be studied under full execution observability, aligning with real-world developer-facing scenarios where complete traces, rather than only outputs, are accessible for diagnosis. To this end, we introduce TraceElephant, a benchmark designed for failure attribution with full execution traces and reproducible environments. We then systematically evaluate failure attribution techniques across various configurations. Specifically, full traces improve attribution accuracy by up to 76.5% over a partial-observation counterpart, confirming that missing inputs obscure many failure causes. TraceElephant provides a foundation for follow-up failure attribution research, promoting evaluation practices that reflect real-world debugging and supporting the development of more transparent MASs.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional capabilities across a wide range of tasks, reliable evaluation remains a critical challenge due to data contamination, opaque operation, and subjective preferences. To address these issues, we propose League of LLMs (LOL), a novel benchmark-free evaluation paradigm that organizes multiple LLMs into a self-governed league for multi-round mutual evaluation. LOL integrates four core criteria (dynamic, transparent, objective, and professional) to mitigate key limitations of existing paradigms. Experiments on eight mainstream LLMs in mathematics and programming demonstrate that LOL can effectively distinguish LLM capabilities while maintaining high internal ranking stability (Top- k consistency = 70.7% ). Beyond ranking, LOL reveals empirical findings that are difficult for traditional paradigms to capture. For instance, “memorization-based answering” behaviors are observed in some models, and higher in-family scores are found in the OpenAI model family ( 𝛥 = 9 , p < 0.05 ). Finally, we make our framework and code publicly available as a valuable complement to the current LLM evaluation ecosystem.

Abstract:
Despite recent progress, existing agent benchmarks neglect a fundamental real-world capability: hierarchical rule application, a critical requirement in fields such as law and medicine where agents must reason from broad categories down to specific exceptions to reach rule-compliant decisions.This introduces significant challenges in resolving logical dependencies and disambiguating vague boundaries.To bridge this gap, we introduce HSCodeComp, a novel benchmark derived from e-commerce, requiring agents to assign a unique 10-digit Harmonized System (HS) Code to products by aligning their fuzzy attributes with strict tariff classification rules.HSCodeComp comprises 632 realistic products across 32 categories, featuring detailed yet noisy product information (titles, attributes, and images). The HS Codes are annotated by a panel of 26 tariff experts, strictly adhering to official rules and an empirical knowledge base, both of which we jointly open-source.Through a comprehensive evaluation of 23 LLMs, VLMs, and agents on HSCodeComp, we demonstrate that: 1) a substantial performance gap remains between state-of-the-art agents and human experts (46.8% vs. 95.0%); and 2) test-time scaling fails to close this gap. Further analysis reveals that 1) excessive reasoning steps frequently induce “reasoning drift,” which degrades accuracy; and 2) agents are prone to premature decisions on high-level categories and reasoning hallucinations that lack factual grounding.

Abstract:
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) as judges have emerged as a prominent approach for evaluating speech generation quality, yet their ability to assess speaker consistency across multi-turn dialogues remains unexplored. We present SpeakerSleuth , a benchmark evaluating whether LALMs can reliably judge speaker consistency across multi-turn dialogues through three tasks reflecting real-world requirements. We construct 1,818 human-verified evaluation instances across four diverse datasets spanning synthetic and real speech, with controlled acoustic difficulty. Evaluating twelve widely-used LALMs, we find that models struggle to reliably detect acoustic inconsistencies. For instance, given audio samples of the same speaker’s turns, some models overpredict inconsistency, whereas others are overly lenient. Models further struggle to identify the exact turns that are problematic. When other interlocutors’ turns are provided as textual context, performance degrades dramatically as models prioritize textual coherence over acoustic cues, failing to detect even obvious gender switches for a speaker. On the other hand, models perform substantially better in comparing and ranking acoustic variants, demonstrating inherent acoustic discrimination capabilities. These findings expose a significant bias in LALMs: they tend to prioritize text over acoustics, revealing fundamental modality imbalances that need to be addressed to build reliable audio-language judges. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/holi-lab/SpeakerSleuth .

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a critical technique for enhancing LLM-based deep search agents. However, existing approaches primarily rely on binary outcome rewards, which fail to capture the comprehensiveness and factuality of agents’ reasoning process, and often lead to undesirable behaviors such as shortcut exploitation and hallucinations. To address these limitations, we propose Citation-aware Rubric Rewards (CaRR) , a fine-grained reward framework for deep search agents that emphasizes reasoning comprehensiveness, factual grounding, and evidence connectivity. CaRR decomposes complex questions into verifiable single-hop rubrics and requires agents to satisfy these rubrics by explicitly identifying hidden entities, supporting them with correct citations, and constructing complete evidence chains that link to the predicted answer. We further introduce Citation-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (C-GRPO) , which combines CaRR and outcome rewards for training robust deep search agents. Experiments show that C-GRPO consistently outperforms standard outcome-based RL baselines across multiple deep search benchmarks. Our analysis also validates that C-GRPO effectively discourages shortcut exploitation, promotes comprehensive, evidence-grounded reasoning, and exhibits strong generalization to open-ended deep research tasks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for empowering Video-LLMs with complex spatiotemporal reasoning. However, current RL paradigms predominantly rely on random data shuffling or naive curriculum strategies based on scalar difficulty metrics. We argue that scalar metrics fail to disentangle two orthogonal challenges in video understanding: Visual-Temporal Perception Load and Cognitive Reasoning Depth. To address this, we propose VideoCuRL, a novel framework that decomposes difficulty into these two axes. We employ efficient, training-free proxies—optical flow/keyframe entropy for visual complexity and Calibrated Surprisal for cognitive complexity—to map data onto a 2D curriculum grid. A competence-aware Diagonal Wavefront strategy then schedules training from base alignment to complex reasoning. Furthermore, we introduce Dynamic Sparse KL and Structured Revisiting to stabilize training against reward collapse and catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments show that VideoCuRL surpasses strong RL baselines on reasoning (+2.5% on VSI-Bench) and perception (+2.9% on VideoMME) tasks. Notably, VideoCuRL eliminates the prohibitive inference overhead of generation-based curricula, offering a scalable solution for robust video post-training.

Abstract:
Despite their rapid advancement, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remain vulnerable to diverse safety risks. Current benchmarks fail to provide reliable assessments due to limited risk coverage, insufficient scale, and the oversight of complex modality combinations (e.g., cross-modal risks). To address this, we introduce the Unified Safety Benchmark (USB), a comprehensive framework covering 61 risk categories across four distinct modality interactions. We first demonstrate that existing benchmarks—even when aggregated—leave significant coverage gaps. To bridge this, we design a sophisticated data synthesis pipeline that generates complementary data, ensuring balanced coverage across all risk dimensions. Furthermore, beyond evaluating vulnerability to harmful queries, USB incorporates the simultaneous assessment of model over-refusal on benign inputs as an integrated diagnostic suite. Experimental results, evaluating 22 MLLMs across 244 risk-modality intersections, demonstrate that existing MLLMs still struggle with the trade-off between avoiding vulnerabilities and over-refusal. Models are particularly vulnerable to image-only or cross-modal risky inputs, highlighting the persistent need for refined safety mechanisms. Warning: This paper contains unfiltered and potentially harmful content that may be offensive.

Abstract:
We introduce AEGIS, A holistic benchmark for Evaluating forensic analysis of AI-Generated academic ImageS. Compared to existing benchmarks, AEGIS features three key advances: (1) Domain-Specific Complexity: covering seven academic categories with 39 fine-grained subtypes, exposing intrinsic forensic difficulty, where even GPT-5.1 reaches 48.80% overall performance and expert models achieve only limited localization accuracy (IoU 30.09%); (2) Diverse Forgery Simulations: modeling four prevalent academic forgery strategies across 25 generative models, with 11 yielding average forensic accuracy below 50%, showing that forensics lag behind generative advances; and (3) Multi-Dimensional Forensic Evaluation: jointly assessing detection, reasoning, and localization, revealing complementary strengths between model families, with multimodal large language models (MLLMs) at 84.74% accuracy in textual artifact recognition and expert detectors peaking at 79.54% accuracy in binary authenticity detection. By evaluating 25 leading MLLMs, nine expert models, and one unified multimodal understanding and generation model, AEGIS serves as a diagnostic testbed exposing fundamental limitations in academic image forensics.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents face fundamental limitations in long-horizon reasoning due to finite context windows, making effective memory management critical. Existing methods typically handle long-term memory (LTM) and short-term memory (STM) as separate components, relying on heuristics or auxiliary controllers, which limits adaptability and end-to-end optimization. In this paper, we propose Agentic Memory (AgeMem), a unified framework that integrates LTM and STM management directly into the agent’s policy. AgeMem exposes memory operations as tool-based actions, enabling the LLM agent to autonomously decide what and when to store, retrieve, update, summarize, or discard information. To train such unified behaviors, we propose a three-stage progressive reinforcement learning strategy and design a step-wise GRPO to address sparse and discontinuous rewards induced by memory operations. Experiments on five long-horizon benchmarks demonstrate that AgeMem consistently outperforms strong memory-augmented baselines across multiple LLM backbones, achieving improved task performance, higher-quality long-term memory, and more efficient context usage.

Abstract:
Distractors—incorrect yet plausible answer choices in multiple-choice questions (MCQs)—are vital in educational assessments, as they help identify student misconceptions by presenting potential reasoning errors. Current distractor generation methods typically produce shared distractors for all students, ignoring the individual variations in reasoning, which limits their diagnostic effectiveness. To tackle this challenge, we introduce the task of Personalized Distractor Generation, which tailors distractors to each student’s specific cognitive flaws, inferred from their past question-answering (QA) history. While promising, this task is particularly demanding due to the limited number of QA records available for each student, which are insufficient for training, as well as the absence of their underlying reasoning process. To overcome this, we propose a novel, training-free two-stage framework. In the first stage, Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is used to reconstruct the student’s reasoning process from past errors, creating a student-specific misconception prototype. In the second stage, this prototype guides the simulation of the student’s reasoning on new questions, generating personalized distractors that resonate with their individual misconceptions. Our experiments, conducted on 1,361 students across 6 subjects, demonstrate that this approach outperforms existing methods in generating plausible, personalized distractors, and also effectively adapts to group-level settings, highlighting its robustness and versatility.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) is pivotal for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of diffusion large language models (dLLMs). However, existing dLLM policy optimization methods suffer from two critical reliability bottlenecks: (1) reward sparsity, arising from coarse or unverifiable signals that impede accurate advantage calculation; and (2) their probability estimates do not account for the gap to the unbiased expectation over all decoding orders, which are intractable to compute. To mitigate these issues, we propose d -TreeRPO, a reliable RL framework for dLLMs that leverages tree-structured rollouts and bottom-up advantage computation based on verifiable outcome rewards to provide fine-grained and verifiable step-wise reward signals. Furthermore, we provide a theoretical proof demonstrating that increasing prediction confidence effectively minimizes the gap between unbiased expected prediction probabilities and its single-step forward pass estimate. Guided by this analysis, we introduce a time-scheduled self-distillation loss during training that enhances prediction confidence in later training stages, thereby enabling more accurate probability estimation and better performance. Experiments demonstrate that d -TreeRPO outperforms existing baselines and achieves significant improvements across multiple reasoning benchmarks. Specifically, it achieves +86.2% on Sudoku, +51.6% on Countdown, +4.5% on GSM8K, and +5.3% on Math500 compared to the base model.

Abstract:
Adapting pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) for time series forecasting primarily relies on token-level linguistic-temporal alignment, leading to the stacking of logically disjointed tokens as input. While empirically effective, these methods overlook a fundamental capability of LLMs: modeling linguistic logic and structure, rather than merely processing token features. To address this limitation, we propose the M arkovian- G uided S tructure- A ware A lignment ( MGSAA ). Our core contribution is a framework that transcends pointwise feature matching to achieve global structural isomorphism between the linguistic and temporal domains. Specifically, MGSAA distills latent evolutionary patterns of language within LLMs into a Markovian state transition graph, which is transferred as a structural prior to the time series domain. Under this prior, time series patches are decoded into latent states and then aligned via state-constrained cross-attention. Ultimately, MGSAA generates a token sequence topologically isomorphic to the LLM’s inherent mental structure, reactivating its reasoning capabilities for forecasting. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that MGSAA achieves state-of-the-art performance, providing an innovative solution for cross-modal alignment in LLM for time series forecasting. Code is available at https://github.com/sunzju/MGSAA.

Abstract:
Deep search agents that combine large language models with retrieval tools excel at complex, multi-hop queries. Yet, existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp rely on black-box web search APIs, facing key limitations. (1) Fairness: for agents, dynamic and opaque web APIs hinder reproducibility and fair comparisons across agents. (2) Disentanglement: for retrieval, the lack of a fixed document corpus makes it impossible to isolate retriever contributions from end-to-end search agent accuracy. We introduce BrowseComp-Plus, a benchmark derived from BrowseComp that employs a fixed, human-verified corpus, enabling controlled retrieval for deep search agents. BrowseComp-Plus clearly distinguishes agent performance: with a BM25 retriever, the open-source Search-R1 achieves 3.86% accuracy, while GPT-5 achieves 55.9%. Additionally, BrowseComp-Plus makes retrieval gains explicit: pairing GPT-5 with Qwen3-Embedding-8B retriever further improves accuracy to 70.1% while reducing search calls. Overall, BrowseComp-Plus provides a fair and disentangled testbed, advancing both deep search agent evaluation and retrieval research for agentic search. Code and data can be found at: https://texttron.github.io/BrowseComp-Plus/

Abstract:
Large language models leverage both parametric knowledge acquired during pretraining and in-context knowledge provided at inference time. Crucially, when these sources conflict, models arbitrate based on their internal confidence, preferring parametric knowledge for high-confidence facts while deferring to context for less familiar ones. However, the training conditions that give rise to these fundamental behaviors remain unclear. Here we conduct controlled experiments using synthetic corpora to identify the specific data properties that shape knowledge utilization. Our results reveal a counterintuitive finding: the robust, balanced use of both knowledge sources is an emergent property that requires the co-occurrence of three factors typically considered detrimental, including (i) intra-document repetition, (ii) a moderate degree of intra-document inconsistency, and (iii) a skewed knowledge distribution. We further show that these dynamics arise in real-world language model pretraining and analyze how post-training procedures reshape arbitration strategies. Together, our findings provide empirical guidance for designing training data that supports the reliable integration of parametric and in-context knowledge in language models.

Abstract:
Binary quantization represents the most extreme form of compression, reducing weights to ± 1 for maximal memory and computational efficiency. While recent sparsity-aware binarization achieves sub-1-bit compression via weight pruning, it faces critical challenger: performance degradation, mask-management overhead, and limited hardware compatibility. In this paper, we present BTC-LLM, a novel sub-1-bit LLM quantization framework that leverages binary pattern clustering and weight transformation to overcome these limitations. Our approach incorporates two key innovations: (1) a Binary Codebook that clusters recurring vectors into compact indices using custom distance metrics and sign-based updates; (2) a Learnable Transformation that reduces outliers and promotes shared sign patterns among binary weights. This eliminates sparse masks, enabling efficient inference on standard hardware. Extensive evaluations across LLaMA, Qwen, and FBI-LLM families demonstrate that BTC-LLM achieves state-of-the-art results in extreme compression (1.11–0.7 bits). Notably, BTC-LLM compressed to 0.8 bits on LLaMA-2-13B maintains high performance—with only a 3.1% accuracy drop in zero-shot benchmarks—while delivering a 1.6 × speedup over FP16.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has not been matched by their evaluation in low-resource languages, especially Southeast Asian languages like Lao. To fill this gap, we introduce LaoBench, the first large-scale, high-quality, and multidimensional benchmark for assessing LLM language understanding and reasoning in Lao. LaoBench contains 17,000+ expert-curated samples across three dimensions: culturally grounded knowledge application, curriculum-aligned K12 education, and bilingual translation among Lao, Chinese, and English. It includes open-source and held-out subsets, where the held-out portion enables secure black-box evaluation via a controlled service to improve fairness and data security. We construct LaoBench with a hybrid pipeline that combines expert authoring with agent-assisted verification, ensuring linguistic accuracy, cultural relevance, and educational validity. We evaluate diverse state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source LLMs, and find that even strong multilingual models lag behind human experts, particularly in culturally grounded reasoning and translation fidelity. We hope LaoBench will catalyze research on Lao and other underrepresented Southeast Asian languages for more inclusive multilingual evaluation.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) in real-world environments often suffers from ambiguous or incomplete reward supervision, which undermines policy stability and generalization. Such noise may cause models to ignore key information or even collapse in advantage estimation. We find that a strong value model is essential for absorbing unstable signals and producing reliable advantages, offering denser and more robust supervision than the reward model. To better optimize noisy supervision, we propose VRPO, a framework that enhances value modeling for robust RL in LLM post-training. VRPO integrates (1) auxiliary losses guided by entropy and perplexity from a frozen language model, and (2) a variational information bottleneck, enabling the value model to filter noise and capture key words. This design allows the value model to correct noise rewards and generate more reliable advantage estimates, transforming it from a passive predictor into an active noise regulator. Experiments on multi-turn dialogue, math reasoning, and science QA with both rule-based and model-based rewards show that VRPO consistently outperforms baselines such as PPO and GRPO. Our work highlight the central role of the value model in Robust RL and provide a principled and practical approach to policy optimization under noisy supervision.

Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) addresses privacy and data-silo issues in the training of large language models (LLMs). Most prior work focuses on improving the efficiency of federated learning for LLMs (FedLLM). However, security in open federated environments, particularly defenses against malicious clients, remains underexplored. To investigate the security of FedLLM, we conduct a preliminary study to analyze potential attack surfaces and defensive characteristics from the perspective of LoRA updates. We find two key properties of FedLLM: 1) LLMs are vulnerable to attacks from malicious clients in FL, and 2) LoRA updates exhibit distinct behavioral patterns that can be effectively distinguished by lightweight classifiers. Based on these properties, we propose Safe-FedLLM, a probe-based defense framework for FedLLM, which constructs defenses across three levels: Step-Level, Client-Level, and Shadow-Level. The core concept of Safe-FedLLM is to perform probe-based discrimination on each client’s local LoRA updates, treating them as high-dimensional behavioral features and using a lightweight classifier to determine whether they are malicious. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Safe-FedLLM effectively improves FedLLM’s robustness against malicious clients while maintaining competitive performance on benign data. Notably, our method effectively suppresses the impact of malicious data without significantly affecting training speed, and remains effective even under high malicious client ratios.

Abstract:
The hallmark of Deep Research agents lies in compositional reasoning, the capacity to aggregate distributed, heterogeneous information into coherent logical insights. However, current agentic systems are often retrieval-heavy but reasoning-light, where success is predominantly determined by simple entity-seeking rather than the multi-step aggregation of scattered evidence. To address this, we propose a data synthesis pipeline WebAggregator, designed to shift the agentic paradigm from retrieval-centric to compositional aggregation. Our approach first employs Proactive Explorer to collect interconnected knowledge, then Compositional Logic Proposer to weave knowledge into complex questions using over 12 composition guidelines derived from a rigorous deconstruction of the Deep Research problem setting. Fine-tuning on this corpus fundamentally transforms agent behavior, fostering deliberate composition reasoning and reduced tool redundancy. The resulting WebAggregator-32B surpasses GPT-4.1 and matches Claude-3.7-Sonnet on GAIA, WebWalkerQA, and XBench. To address the lack of benchmarks that emphasize both reasoning and retrieval, we introduce the WebAggregatorQA testbed, which reveals that even with perfect retrieval, top-tier models still underperformed. These results demonstrate that compositional reasoning, not retrieval, is the true performance ceiling for next-generation research agents.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in dialogue systems and interactive agents, their social adaptation during natural interaction has drawn growing attention. While prior work shows strong social regulation under explicit role or style instructions, it remains unclear whether LLMs can spontaneously perceive and respond to implicit social differences without explicit prompts. Focusing on high-context Chinese interactions, we identify a robust phenomenon termed Social Agnosia, where LLMs fail to adequately perceive and accommodate implicit social power, affective arousal, and epistemic status during natural interaction. To diagnose this behavior, we propose C-ISA, a framework grounded in Communication Accommodation Theory that decomposes social adaptation into three approximately orthogonal dimensions, and conduct controlled comparisons across multiple Chinese LLMs under implicit and explicit conditions. Results show that while models substantially adjust linguistic strategies under explicit conditioning, they exhibit socially insensitive and homogenized responses in natural interaction, revealing a structural gap between spontaneous behavior and conditioned capability. The C-ISA dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/ty373/C-ISA.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on agentic capabilities—iterative retrieval, tool use, and decision-making—to overcome the limits of static, parametric knowledge. Yet existing agentic frameworks treat external information as unstructured text and fail to leverage the topological dependencies inherent in real-world data. To bridge this gap, we introduce Agentic Graph Learning (AGL), a paradigm that reframes graph learning as an interleaved process of topology-aware navigation and LLM-based inference. Specifically, we propose AgentGL, the first reinforcement learning (RL)–driven framework for AGL. AgentGL equips an LLM agent with graph-native tools for multi-scale exploration, regulates tool usage via search-constrained thinking to balance accuracy and efficiency, and employs a graph-conditioned curriculum RL strategy to stabilize long-horizon policy learning without step-wise supervision. Across diverse Text-Attributed Graph (TAG) benchmarks and multiple LLM backbones, AgentGL substantially outperforms strong GraphLLMs and GraphRAG baselines, achieving absolute improvements of up to 17.5% in node classification and 28.4% in link prediction. These results demonstrate that AGL is a promising frontier for enabling LLMs to autonomously navigate and reason over complex relational environments. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/sunyuanfu/AgentGL .

Abstract:
Tables contain rich structured information, yet when stored as images their contents remain "locked" within pixels. Converting table images into LaTeX code enables faithful digitization and reuse, but current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often fail to preserve structural, style, or content fidelity. Conventional post-training with reinforcement learning (RL) typically relies on a single aggregated reward, leading to reward ambiguity that conflates multiple behavioral aspects and hinders effective optimization. We propose Component-Specific Policy Optimization (CSPO), an RL framework that disentangles optimization across LaTeX tables components—structure, style, and content. In particular, CSPO assigns component-specific rewards and backpropagates each signal only through the tokens relevant to its component, alleviating reward ambiguity and enabling targeted component-wise optimization. To comprehensively assess performance, we introduce a set of hierarchical evaluation metrics. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of CSPO, underscoring the importance of component-specific optimization for reliable structured generation.

Abstract:
Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) is inherently challenging, as it requires sophisticated reasoning over dynamic facts with multi-hop dependencies and complex temporal constraints. Existing methods rely on fixed workflows and expensive closed-source APIs, limiting flexibility and scalability. We propose Temp-R1, the first autonomous end-to-end agent for TKGQA trained through reinforcement learning. To address cognitive overload in single-action reasoning, we expand the action space with specialized internal actions alongside external action. To prevent shortcut learning on simple questions, we introduce reverse curriculum learning that trains on difficult questions first, forcing the development of sophisticated reasoning before transferring to easier cases. Our 8B-parameter Temp-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance on MultiTQ and TimelineKGQA, improving 19.8% over strong baselines on complex questions. Our work establishes a new paradigm for autonomous temporal reasoning agents. The code is available at https://github.com/zjukg/Temp-R1 .

Abstract:
Human cognition excels at extending knowledge through analogy, where word meanings evolve along structured pathways from concrete prototypes to abstract senses via metaphor and metonymy. Do Large Language Models (LLMs) internalize this generative logic, or merely mimic statistical patterns? To investigate this, we introduce CogEvolve, a cognitive linguistic benchmark designed to test these evolutionary pathways across textual and visual modalities. Our evaluation reveals a distinct cognitive profile: models function as "Super-Associators" expert at static recognition yet fail at causal reasoning. In text, they exhibit a Frequency-Primacy Conflation, confusing statistical prevalence with cognitive basicness. Crucially, this reasoning collapses further in the visual domain. We term this deficit the Ungrounded Arrow: models possess high-fidelity concept representations (the "dots") but lack the transformational operators (the "arrows") essential for true relational understanding.

Abstract:
Automating Graphical User Interface (GUI) operations with Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) is promising but remains bottlenecked in real-world long-horizon settings. Key challenges include ensuring precise grounding across diverse interfaces and handling irreversible errors in extended workflows. Current methods often struggle to distinguish targets in low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) environments and lack sufficient pre-execution verification to prevent error accumulation. To address this, we propose the Memory-augmented Debate System (MaDS). Specifically, MaDS combines: (1) a Dual-Layer Memory Module that integrates universal interaction priors with scenario-specific operational experience to mitigate grounding hallucinations; and (2) Multi-Round Debate that performs pre-execution verification, while transforming execution failures into retrievable Negative Warnings to reduce repeated errors. Additionally, we introduce MaDS-Benchmark, a benchmark for long-horizon mobile GUI tasks with process-oriented evaluation. Experiments show that MaDS achieves a 90.23% Task Success Rate on MaDS-Benchmark and strong performance on public benchmarks including AITW, AITZ, CAGUI, and GUIOdyssey.

Abstract:
Despite the recent success of large language models (LLMs) in time-series forecasting, most existing methods still adopt a Deep Synchronous Fusion strategy, where dense interactions between textual and temporal features are enforced at every layer of the network. This design overlooks the inherent granularity mismatch between modalities and leads to what we term semantic perceptual dissonance: high-level abstract semantics provided by the LLM become inappropriately entangled with the low-level, fine-grained numerical dynamics of time series, making it difficult for semantic priors to effectively guide forecasting. To address this issue, we propose TimeSAF, a new framework based on hierarchical asynchronous fusion. Unlike synchronous approaches, TimeSAF explicitly decouples unimodal feature learning from cross-modal interaction. It introduces an independent cross-modal semantic fusion trunk, which uses learnable queries to aggregate global semantics from the temporal and prompt backbones in a bottom-up manner, and a stage-wise semantic refinement decoder that asynchronously injects these high-level signals back into the temporal backbone. This mechanism provides stable and efficient semantic guidance while avoiding interference with low-level temporal dynamics. Extensive experiments on standard long-term forecasting benchmarks show that TimeSAF significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, and further exhibits strong generalization in both few-shot and zero-shot transfer settings.

Abstract:
Efficiently aligning visual features with Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a critical bottleneck in Multimodal LLMs. Existing query-based alignment modules (e.g., Q-Former) rely on randomly initialized queries, resulting in an inefficient cold start exploration process. Furthermore, they enforce uniform cross-attention across all layers, leading to computational redundancy. Our empirical analysis reveals that query tokens initialized with language priors can rapidly capture global semantics, leading to early representation convergence after only a few layers. In this paper, we propose Cat-MoD, a Caption token Guided Asymmetric Mixture-of-Depths framework. It incorporates a Hybrid Query Construction module where Guide Tokens initialized from coarse-grained linguistic priors rapidly anchor global semantic context, and randomly initialized Explorer Tokens remain active to capture fine-grained visual details. Exploiting this early convergence, we introduce an Asymmetric Mixture-of-Depths mechanism, where a similarity-aware router dynamically prunes redundant tokens from expensive cross-attention layers while preserving their context in self-attention. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Cat-MoD matches or surpasses baseline performance, while substantially reducing alignment FLOPs by approximately 37% during both training and inference, offering a highly efficient solution for multimodal alignment. Code: https://github.com/JasonOrange0726/Cat-MoD.

Abstract:
In recent years, safety risks associated with large language models have become increasingly prominent, highlighting the urgent need to mitigate the generation of toxic and harmful content. The mainstream paradigm for LLM safety alignment typically adopts a collaborative framework involving three roles: an attacker for adversarial prompt generation, a defender for safety defense, and an evaluator for response assessment. In this paper, we propose a closed-loop reinforcement learning framework called TriPlay-RL that enables iterative and co-improving collaboration among three roles with near-zero manual annotation. Experimental results show that the attacker preserves high output diversity while achieving a 20%–50% improvement in adversarial effectiveness. The defender attains 10%–30% gains in safety performance without degrading general reasoning capability, and the evaluator continuously refines its fine-grained judgment ability through iterations, accurately distinguishing unsafe responses, simple refusals, and useful guidance. Overall, our framework establishes an efficient and scalable paradigm for LLM safety alignment, enabling continuous co-evolution within a unified learning loop. The code is available at https://github.com/Qihoo360/TriPlay-RL .

Abstract:
Emoticons are widely used in digital communication to convey affective intent, yet their safety implications for Large Language Models (LLMs) remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we identify emoticon semantic confusion, a vulnerability where LLMs misinterpret ASCII-based emoticons to perform unintended and even destructive actions. To systematically study this phenomenon, we develop an automated data generation pipeline and construct a dataset containing 3,757 code-oriented test cases spanning 21 meta-scenarios, four programming languages, and varying contextual complexities. Our study on six LLMs reveals that emoticon semantic confusion is pervasive, with an average confusion ratio exceeding 38%. More critically, over 90% of confused responses yield ’silent failures’, which are syntactically valid outputs but deviate from user intent, potentially leading to destructive security consequences.Furthermore, we observe that this vulnerability readily transfers to popular agent frameworks, while existing prompt-based mitigations remain largely ineffective. We call on the community to recognize this emerging vulnerability and develop effective mitigation methods to uphold the safety and reliability of human-LLM interactions.

Abstract:
Accurate assessment of critical thinking is historically limited by the Intention Behavior Gap in psychology: the disconnect between what individuals self-reported disposition and their actual practical behaviors. We try to bridge this gap with MASA (Multi-Agent Scenario-based Assessment), a framework that operationalizes cognitive assessment into an interpretable and interactive multi-agent workflow with Assessment Chain-of-Thought (AsCoT). Validating on both large-scale simulations (N=1,161) and human participants (N=70), we find that MASA aligns better with human expert ratings (r=0.882) than traditional gold-standard inventories (r=0.720), with an average cost of only 0.41 per participant. These results suggest that by shifting from self-report inventory to behavior-grounded dialogue, MASA offers a more accurate, cost-effective, and transparent solution for real-world cognitive evaluation.

Abstract:
Discrete Diffusion Language Models have emerged as a compelling paradigm for unified multimodal generation, yet their deployment is hindered by high inference latency arising from iterative decoding. Existing acceleration strategies often require expensive re-training or fail to leverage the 2D spatial redundancy inherent in visual data. To address this, we propose Locality-Aware Dynamic Rescue (LADR), a training-free method that expedites inference by exploiting the spatial Markov property of images. LADR prioritizes the recovery of tokens at the “generation frontier”, regions spatially adjacent to observed pixels, thereby maximizing information gain. Specifically, our method integrates morphological neighbor identification to locate candidate tokens, employs a risk-bounded filtering mechanism to prevent error propagation, and utilizes manifold-consistent inverse scheduling to align the diffusion trajectory with the accelerated mask density. Extensive experiments on four text-to-image generation benchmarks demonstrate that our LADR achieves an approximate 4 × speedup over standard baselines. Remarkably, it maintains or even enhances generative fidelity, particularly in spatial reasoning tasks, offering a state-of-the-art trade-off between efficiency and quality.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong capabilities across a broad range of benchmarks. However, most existing evaluations focus on passive inference, where models perform step-by-step reasoning under complete information. This setup is misaligned with real-world use, where seeing is not enough. This raises a fundamental question: Can MLLMs actively acquire missing evidence under incomplete information? To bridge this gap, we require the MLLMs to actively acquire missing evidence and iteratively refine decisions under incomplete information, by selecting a target image from a candidate pool without task-specific priors. To support systematic study, we propose GuessBench, a benchmark with both perception-oriented and knowledge-oriented images for evaluating active reasoning in MLLMs. We evaluate 20 superior MLLMs and find that performance on active reasoning lags far behind it on passive settings, indicating substantial room for improvement. Further analysis identifies fine-grained perception and timely decision-making as key challenges. Ablation studies show that perceptual enhancements benefit smaller models, whereas thinking-oriented methods provide consistent gains across model sizes. These results suggest promising directions for future research on multimodal active reasoning.

Abstract:
Identifying which text spans refer to entities - mention detection- is both foundational for information extraction and a known performance bottleneck. We introduce ToMMeR, a lightweight model (<300K parameters) probing mention detection capabilities from early LLM layers. Across 13 NER benchmarks, ToMMeR achieves 93% recall zero-shot, with an estimated 90% precision under a human-calibrated LLM-judge protocol, showing that ToMMeR rarely produces spurious predictions despite high recall. Cross-model analysis reveals that diverse architectures (14M-15B parameters) converge on similar mention boundaries (DICE >75%), confirming that mention detection emerges naturally from language modeling. When extended with span classification heads, ToMMeR achieves competitive NER performance (80-87% F1 on standard benchmarks). Our work provides evidence that structured entity representations exist in early transformer layers and can be efficiently recovered with minimal parameters.

Abstract:
Multimodal foundation models that integrate audio, vision, and language achieve strong performance on reasoning and generation tasks, yet their robustness to adversarial manipulation remains poorly understood. We study a realistic and underexplored threat model: untargeted, audio-only adversarial attacks on trimodal audio–video–language models. We analyze six complementary attack objectives that target different stages of multimodal processing, including audio encoder representations, cross-modal attention, hidden states, and output likelihoods. Across four state-of-the-art models and multiple benchmarks, we show that audio-only perturbations can induce severe multimodal failures, achieving up to 96% attack success rate. We further show that attacks can be successful at low perceptual distortions (LPIPS ≤ 0.08 , SI-SNR ≥ 0 dB) and benefit more from extended optimization than increased data scale. We evaluate the feasibility of these attacks under physically realistic conditions by incorporating room impulse response (RIR) modeling, showing that audio-only perturbations remain effective under environmental transformations and thus highlight the practical risk of single-modality attacks in real-world multimodal systems. Transferability across models and encoders remains limited, while speech recognition systems such as Whisper primarily respond to perturbation magnitude, achieving >97% attack success under severe distortion. These results expose a previously overlooked single-modality attack surface in multimodal systems and motivate defenses that enforce cross-modal consistency. Our project website is available at https://aafiya-h.github.io/soundbreak/.

Abstract:
Tool-using agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in tasks such as mathematical reasoning and multi-hop question answering. However, in long trajectories, agents often trigger excessive and low-quality tool calls, increasing latency and degrading inference performance, making managing tool-use behavior challenging. In this work, we conduct entropy-based pilot experiments and observe a strong positive correlation between entropy reduction and high-quality tool calls. Building on this finding, we propose using entropy reduction as a supervisory signal and design two reward strategies to address the differing needs of optimizing tool-use behavior. Sparse outcome rewards provide coarse, trajectory-level guidance to improve efficiency, while dense process rewards offer fine-grained supervision to enhance performance. Experiments across diverse domains show that both reward designs improve tool-use behavior: the former reduces tool calls by 72.07% compared to the average of baselines, while the latter improves performance by 22.27%. These results position entropy reduction as a key mechanism for enhancing tool-use behavior, enabling agents to be more adaptive in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Existing memory benchmarks for LLM agents evaluate explicit recall of facts, yet overlook implicit memory where experience becomes automated behavior without conscious retrieval. This gap is critical: effective assistants must automatically apply learned procedures or avoid failed actions without explicit reminders. We introduce ImplicitMemBench, the first systematic benchmark evaluating implicit memory through three cognitively grounded constructs drawn from standard cognitive-science accounts of non-declarative memory: Procedural Memory (one-shot skill acquisition after interference), Priming (theme-driven bias via paired experimental/control instances), and Classical Conditioning (Conditioned Stimulus–Unconditioned Stimulus (CS–US) associations shaping first decisions). Our 300-item suite employs a unified Learning/Priming-Interfere-Test protocol with first-attempt scoring. Evaluation of 17 models reveals severe limitations: no model exceeds 66% overall, with top performers DeepSeek-R1 (65.3%), Qwen3-32B (64.1%), and GPT-5 (63.0%) far below human baselines. Analysis uncovers dramatic asymmetries (inhibition 17.6% vs. preference 75.0%) and universal bottlenecks requiring architectural innovations beyond parameter scaling. ImplicitMemBench reframes evaluation from "what agents recall" to "what they automatically enact".

Abstract:
Sign Language Retrieval (SLRet) enables efficient access to sign language content but remains fragile in fine-grained scenarios where visually similar signs must be distinguished. We show that this limitation does not stem from model capacity, but from ineffective hard negative supervision. Specifically, we formulate fine-grained retrieval failures as a negative distribution mismatch: semantically distinct yet visually confusable signs are rarely treated as hard negatives, while existing text-based mining strategies fail to capture such visual ambiguity. To address this issue, we propose Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining (SAN), which constructs hard negatives based on visual confusability in the sign embedding space rather than linguistic similarity. Experiments on PHOENIX-2014T demonstrate that SAN substantially improves fine-grained retrieval performance while preserving coarse-grained accuracy, highlighting the importance of aligning negative supervision with visual ambiguity in sign language retrieval.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) excel at general programming but struggle with domain-specific software development. This gap motivates research into domain specialization methods that enable LLMs to learn and utilize domain knowledge and data. However, existing domain-specific code benchmarks focus on assessing what knowledge LLMs possess rather than how they acquire and apply new knowledge, lacking explicit knowledge corpora for developing domain specialization methods. To this end, we present KOCO-bench, a novel benchmark designed for evaluating domain specialization methods in real-world software development. KOCO-bench contains 6 emerging domains with 11 software frameworks and 25 projects, featuring curated knowledge corpora alongside multi-granularity evaluation tasks including domain code generation (from function-level to project-level with rigorous test suites) and domain knowledge understanding (via multiple-choice Q A). Unlike previous benchmarks that only provide test sets for direct evaluation, KOCO-bench requires acquiring and applying diverse domain knowledge (APIs, rules, constraints, etc.) from the corpora to solve evaluation tasks. Our evaluations reveal that KOCO-bench poses significant challenges to state-of-the-art LLMs. Even with domain specialization methods (e.g., SFT, RAG, kNN-LM) applied, improvements remain marginal. Best-performing coding agent, Claude Code, achieves only 34.2%, highlighting the urgent need for more effective domain specialization methods. We release KOCO-bench, evaluation code, and baselines to advance further research at https://github.com/jiangxxxue/KOCO-bench.

Abstract:
Dynamic topic modeling aims to capture topic evolution from temporal text corpora. However, existing methods face two major challenges when applied to short texts: semantic ambiguity and interpretation ambiguity. Semantic ambiguity arises from the sparsity of short texts and the neglect of temporal semantic shifts. Interpretation ambiguity refers to the latent topics that lack human-understandable descriptions. In this work, we propose a novel Dual-View representation learning-based Interpretable short text Dynamic Topic Model (DVI-DTM). To address semantic ambiguity, the Dual-View Representation Learning module is presented to learn robust document-topic distributions by aligning temporal-aware term view and sentence view representations of short texts. To tackle interpretation ambiguity, we introduce a GEA Topic Refiner that leverages LLM agents to generate topic descriptions and refine document-topic distributions through collaborative semantic reasoning. Furthermore, a Dual-Factor Ranking module is designed to capture the topic evolution through semantic relevance and temporal uniqueness. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that DVI-DTM outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in topic alignment and dynamic topic quality metrics while producing highly interpretable topic descriptions.

Abstract:
Wikipedia’s perceived high quality and broad language coverage have established it as a fundamental resource in NLP. However, in recent years, such assumptions of high quality have become the subject of scrutiny in low-resource and multilingual contexts. In this study, we subject the entirety of non-English Wikipedia to a data filtering procedure typically reserved for noisy web-text — a process which removes a large percentage of the collection’s data. In analysing the removed data, we reveal numerous systematic quality issues, such as script and language contamination, repeated template and placeholder articles, and a high concentration of bot-generated content. We consolidate these findings into a 4-level quality ranking of Wikipedia, which shows strong correspondence with alternative quality measures and heuristics. Lastly, we evaluate the downstream impact of quality filtering in three practical language modelling scenarios, showing that models trained on filtered data largely match or outperform those trained on raw Wikipedia, with the largest gains observed for lower-quality language editions. Ultimately, our experiments serve as a first step in establishing quality-aware best practices for Wikipedia utilization in NLP, laying groundwork that can inform future dataset creation and curation efforts.

Abstract:
Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) have shown strong potential as multilingual Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents, as evidenced by existing GUI benchmarks. However, these benchmarks exhibit two primary limitations: (1) although Perception and Reasoning (P R) capabilities are fundamental for GUI agents, current benchmarks lack fine-grained diagnostics to identify which specific capabilities lead to task failures, hindering targeted improvements; (2) existing benchmarks fail to provide a strictly aligned cross-lingual evaluation environment, introducing confounding factors that prevent isolating the language impact on GUI agent performance. To address these issues, we propose the Multilingual P R GUI Benchmark (MPR-GUI-Bench), featuring strictly aligned environments across six languages and eight fine-grained P R tasks. Our benchmark reveals consistent P R gaps between English and non-English settings, particularly on reasoning-intensive tasks. To leverage the superior English P R capabilities for bridging cross-lingual gaps, we identify layers sensitive to language and propose GUI-XLI, a GUI Cross-Lingual Intervention method that aligns non-English hidden states with their English counterparts at these layers during inference. Experiments show that GUI-XLI effectively reduces the cross-lingual gaps, with an average gain of 6.5% in non-English settings.

Abstract:
Currently, large language models (LLMs) have significant limitations in spatial reasoning, particularly in the absence of visual input. To address this issue, we introduce SODA (Spatial OODA), which draws inspiration from the OODA cognitive loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), originally designed to enhance human decision-making in dynamic environments. Specifically, we embed the OODA loop into multiple control tasks, generating the SPOD-143k dataset, and successfully integrate it into LLMs through a two-phase and spatia-aware training strategy (SFT and GRPO). Furthermore, to fill the gap in evaluating spatial reasoning in purely text-based LLMs, we introduce the SPOD-Bench benchmark, including multiple tasks divided into three levels of difficulty. Experimental results show that SODA significantly enhances the spatial reasoning capabilities of LLMs across testing scenarios including SPOD-Bench, SPACE and applications, providing a replicable and effective paradigm for improving the spatial cognition of LLMs.

Abstract:
While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities through explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation, they frequently suffer from “overthinking”. In this work, we bridge this gap by introducing Token-level Marginal Utility , which quantifies the per-token log-probability gain of the ground-truth answer. Leveraging this dense supervision signal, we propose MUTO ( M arginal U tility Guided T hinking O ptimization), a unified training framework designed to synthesize concise reasoning chains. Rather than relying only on coarse trajectory-level length control, MUTO identifies tokens that reduce the model’s likelihood of the correct answer and penalizes such negative-utility reasoning, yielding concise yet effective CoT trajectories. Experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen backbones (1.5B and 7B) across six math reasoning benchmarks show that MUTO yields a markedly better efficiency-accuracy Pareto frontier. It reduces average token usage by 87.1% at 1.5B while improving accuracy by 2.3%, and cuts tokens by 80.2% at 7B with only -0.1% accuracy change, achieving the best length-normalized accuracy among baselines.

Abstract:
Tabular data is widely used in fields such as finance and healthcare. Traditional tree-based models are prevalent for tabular prediction tasks due to their ability to handle heterogeneous features. However, their heavy reliance on feature engineering limits both their generalizability and their human-readable interpretability. On the other hand, Large Language Models (LLMs) naturally provide intermediate reasoning steps, thus offering greater transparency in decision-making. Nevertheless, LLMs often fail to match the predictive performance of tree-based models on tabular data. To address these challenges, we propose a novel Logic-Graph-Enhanced LLM Reasoning (LogGER) framework that integrates the strengths of tree-based models and LLMs. Specifically, we reformulate the traditional decision tree as a human-readable logic graph, which explicitly models the causal relationships between features and targets. This logic graph is automatically constructed using LLMs based on data priors and serves as the foundation for LogGER. To fully leverage the logic graph, we further introduce a logic-graph-guided process supervision approach, which evaluates and enhances the quality of LLM’s intermediate reasoning steps using logic-graph-aided process reward. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LogGER consistently outperforms both tree-based models and state-of-the-art LLM methods on a variety of tabular prediction tasks, achieving superior accuracy and interpretability.

Abstract:
Generating radiology reports from 3D volumetric data remains challenging due to the difficulty of grounding fine-grained pathologies within high-dimensional scans. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers a potential solution, standard approaches struggle with visual-semantic ambiguity and often introduce irrelevant "normal" context that dilutes pathological signals. To address this limitation, we introduce CPR-RAG, a model-agnostic RAG framework that enhances organ-level grounding by integrating clinical priors into the retrieval process. Specifically, we propose a clinical prior-regularized re-ranking module that leverages corpus-derived co-occurrence statistics to align retrieved candidates with latent disease distributions, ensuring clinical consistency beyond mere visual similarity. Furthermore, we employ clinical relevance context refinement to selectively filter out boilerplate normal descriptions, thereby maximizing the information density of the evidence provided to the generator. Extensive experiments on the RadGenome-ChestCT benchmark demonstrate that CPR-RAG significantly improves clinical efficacy across state-of-the-art radiology report generation models. Human evaluation further confirms that our approach achieves superior factual correctness, completeness, and utility compared to the existing models.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) has proven effective for training reasoning-oriented large language models, but existing methods largely assume high-resource settings with abundant training data. In low-resource scenarios, RLVR is prone to more severe entropy collapse, which substantially limits exploration and degrades reasoning performance. To address this issue, we propose Hybrid-domain Entropy dynamics ALignment (HEAL), a framework tailored for few-shot RLVR. HEAL first selectively incorporates high-value general-domain data to promote more diverse exploration. Then, we introduce Entropy Dynamics Alignment (EDA), a reward mechanism that aligns trajectory-level entropy dynamics between the target and general domains, capturing both entropy magnitude and fine-grained variation. Through this alignment, EDA not only further mitigates entropy collapse but also encourages the policy to acquire more diverse exploration behaviors from the general domain. Experiments across multiple domains show that HEAL consistently improves few-shot RLVR performance. Notably, using only 32 target-domain samples, HEAL matches or even surpasses full-shot RLVR trained with 1K target-domain samples.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show strong capabilities in general reasoning but typically lack reliability in scientific domains like quantum mechanics, which demand strict adherence to physical constraints. This limitation arises from the scarcity of verifiable training resources and the inadequacy of coarse feedback signals in standard alignment paradigms. To address the data challenge, we introduce QuantumQA, a large-scale dataset constructed via a task-adaptive strategy and a hybrid verification protocol that combines deterministic solvers with semantic auditing to guarantee scientific rigor. Building on this foundation, we propose the verification-aware reward model (VRM) tailored for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), which employs an adaptive reward fusion (ARF) mechanism to dynamically integrate deterministic signals from a scientific execution suite (SES) with multidimensional semantic evaluations for precise supervision. Experimental results demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms baselines and general-purpose preference models. Notably, our optimized 8B model achieves performance competitive with proprietary models, validating that incorporating verifiable, rule-based feedback into the reinforcement learning loop offers a parameter-efficient alternative to pure scaling.

Abstract:
The increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) has raised serious concerns about their reliability and trustworthiness. As a result, a growing body of research focuses on evidence-based text generation with LLMs, aiming to link model outputs to supporting evidence to ensure traceability and verifiability. However, the field is fragmented due to inconsistent terminology, isolated evaluation practices, and a lack of unified benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we systematically analyze 134 papers, introduce a unified taxonomy of evidence-based text generation with LLMs, and investigate 300 evaluation metrics across seven key dimensions. Thereby, we focus on approaches that use citations, attribution, or quotations for evidence-based text generation. Building on this, we examine the distinctive characteristics and representative methods in the field. Finally, we highlight open challenges and outline promising directions for future work.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate highly persuasive text, raising concerns about their misuse for propaganda, manipulation, and other harmful purposes. This leads us to our central question: Is LLM-generated persuasion more difficult to automatically detect than human-written persuasion? To address this, we categorize controllable generation approaches for producing persuasive content with LLMs and introduce Persuaficial, a high-quality multilingual benchmark covering six languages: English, German, Polish, Italian, French and Russian. Using this benchmark, we conduct extensive empirical evaluations comparing human-authored and LLM-generated persuasive texts. We find that although overtly persuasive LLM-generated texts can be easier to detect than human-written ones, subtle LLM-generated persuasion consistently degrades automatic detection performance. Beyond detection performance, we provide the first comprehensive linguistic analysis contrasting human and LLM-generated persuasive texts, offering insights that may guide the development of more interpretable and robust detection tools.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) effectively enhances the accuracy and timeliness of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge retrieved from external sources. However, with the increasing prevalence of LLM-generated content, external corpora used by RAG systems may become contaminated with LLM-generated texts. Such contamination compromises the reliability and quality of retrieved results, ultimately leading to a degradation in RAG performance, and raises concerns about the diminishing presence of human texts and the “Spiral of Silence” effect. A natural solution is to incorporate LLM text detectors into the RAG pipeline to filter out LLM-generated texts from the retrieved results. However, their effective use in RAG remains under-explored. In this paper, we explore the usage paradigms of LLM text detectors for RAG and highlight key limitations of off-the-shelf or directly fine-tuned detectors. To this end, we propose a RAG-aware data augmentation strategy that aligns detector training with realistic contamination patterns. Our approach synthesizes training data from both LLM and human texts under diverse generation modes. Experiments show that our method mitigates performance degradation and improves the long-term stability of RAG systems.

Abstract:
Biomedical document-level relation extraction poses significant challenges beyond sentence-level tasks, as it necessitates the integration of evidence from entire documents and the ability for coherent cross-sentence reasoning. While pretrained language models (PLMs) demonstrate efficiency in handling local contexts, they often struggle with global dependency modeling. Conversely, large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but tend to generate hallucinations in knowledge-intensive biomedical domains. This paper introduces CoRE, a novel cascade framework that leverages the complementary strengths of PLMs and LLMs through a detect-then-rethink paradigm. The PLM serves as an efficient detector for high-confidence relations, while challenging cases are forwarded to an LLM enhanced with semantic retrieval and iterative reasoning mechanisms. Experimental results on BioRED and CDR datasets show that CoRE achieves substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, validating the effectiveness of the proposed cascade paradigm for complex biomedical relation extraction.

Abstract:
LLMs are ubiquitous in modern NLP, and while their applicability extends to texts produced for democratic activities such as online deliberations or large-scale citizen consultations, ethical questions have been raised for their usage as analysis tools. We continue this line of research with two main goals: (a) to develop resources that can help standardize citizen contributions in public forums at the pragmatic level , and make them easier to use in topic modeling and political analysis; (b) to study how well this standardization can reliably be performed by small, open-weights LLMs, i.e. models that can be run locally and transparently with limited resources. Accordingly, we introduce Corpus Clarification as a preprocessing framework for large-scale consultation data that transforms noisy, multi-topic contributions into structured, self-contained argumentative units ready for downstream analysis. We present GDN-CC , a manually-curated dataset of 1,231 contributions to the French Grand Débat National , comprising 2,285 argumentative units annotated for argumentative structure and manually clarified. We then show that finetuned Small Language Models match or outperform LLMs on reproducing these annotations, and measure their usability for an opinion clustering task. We finally release GDN-CC-large , an automatically annotated corpus of 240k contributions, the largest annotated democratic consultation dataset to date.

Abstract:
Experimental protocols in organic synthesis specify not only the intended transformation but also an executable sequence of operations and conditions. While recent language models show strong chemistry knowledge, widely used evaluations remain less diagnostic of procedure-level decision making. In this setting, correctness requires consistent step ordering, feasibility under stated conditions, faithful entity-role grounding, and schema-parseable outputs that can be automatically validated against operational constraints. We present ChemReason-Bench, a human-validated benchmark for verifiable experimental procedure reasoning built on a structured representation with explicit placeholders and a unified schema, enabling automatic checks of many operational constraints. From 500 reactions, we instantiate 7306 benchmark tasks across six complementary formats: ordering, step validation, condition validation, schema-constrained completion, contrastive choice, and evidence-grounded rationalization. We further release a large-scale instantiation of the same templates for downstream adaptation studies, kept disjoint from the evaluation set. Using a unified evaluation protocol, we benchmark diverse open-source, proprietary, and domain-specific models and observe clear variation across the capability surface. We also report controlled adaptation experiments in the appendix, where supervised fine-tuning improves small models, preference optimization adds limited gains in our setting, and a gap remains to the strongest evaluated systems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models demonstrate strong capabilities in single-turn instruction following but suffer from Lost-in-Conversation (LiC), a degradation in performance as information is revealed progressively in multi-turn settings. Motivated by the current progress on Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), we propose Curriculum Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Accuracy and Abstention Rewards (RLAAR), a framework that encourages models not only to generate correct answers, but also to judge the solvability of questions in the multi-turn conversation setting. Our approach employs a competence-gated curriculum that incrementally increases dialogue difficulty (in terms of instruction shards), stabilizing training while promoting reliability. Using multi-turn, on-policy rollouts and a mixed-reward system, RLAAR teaches models to balance problem-solving with informed abstention, reducing premature answering behaviors that cause LiC. Evaluated on LiC benchmarks, RLAAR significantly mitigates LiC performance decay (62.6% to 75.1%) and improves calibrated abstention rates (33.5% to 73.4%). Together, these results provide a practical recipe for building multi-turn reliable and trustworthy LLMs.

Abstract:
We investigate the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in detecting implicit and explicit hate speech, examining how models with minimal safety alignment (uncensored) compare with more heavily aligned (censored) counterparts in a deployed-model setting when deployed using political personas. While uncensored models are often framed as offering a less constrained perspective, our results reveal a trade-off: censored models outperform their uncensored counterparts in both accuracy and robustness, achieving 69.0% versus 64.1% strict accuracy. However, this higher performance is also associated with greater resistance to persona-based influence, while uncensored models are more malleable to ideological framing. Furthermore, we identify critical failures across all models in understanding nuanced language such as irony. We also find alarming fairness disparities in performance across different targeted groups and systemic overconfidence that renders self-reported certainty unreliable. These findings challenge the notion of LLMs as objective arbiters and highlight the need for more sophisticated auditing frameworks that account for fairness, calibration, and ideological consistency. Taken together, these results point to censorship-as-deployed rather than safety alignment in isolation as the more appropriate frame for interpreting model differences.

Abstract:
Neologisms, emerging terms in meaning or form, can serve as new vehicles for toxic expression, like "田园女" ("country girl") as a stigmatizing label targeting feminism. Such toxic neologisms appear benign but have evolved into toxic usage in public consensus, posing challenges to moderation systems and remaining underexplored. In this paper, we investigate how to detect implicit toxicity expressed via neologisms. We first propose a taxonomy that captures the origins and consensus-verification criteria of toxic neologisms, followed by the construction of a lexicon spanning widely observed risk categories. To capture toxicity grounded in public consensus, we introduce SeTox, a search-augmented framework that enables static large language models (LLMs) to incorporate real-time web context for neologism toxicity detection. Experiments show that SeTox, even with 3B-scale models, outperforms recent large-scale models, demonstrating its scalability to incorporate real-world knowledge for toxic neologism detection. Disclaimer: this paper has offensive contents that may be disturbing to some readers.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across many NLP tasks, their opaque internal mechanisms hinder trustworthiness and safe deployment. Existing surveys in explainable AI largely focus on post-hoc explanation methods that interpret trained models through external approximations. In contrast, intrinsic interpretability, which builds transparency directly into model architectures and computations, has recently emerged as a promising alternative. This paper presents a systematic review of the recent advances in intrinsic interpretability for LLMs, categorizing existing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. We further discuss open challenges and outline future research directions in this emerging field. The paper list is available at: Survey-Intrinsic-Interpretability-of-LLMs

Abstract:
Scientific ideation aims to propose novel solutions within a given scientific context. Existing LLM-based agentic approaches emulate human research workflows, yet inadequately model scientific reasoning, resulting in surface-level conceptual recombinations that lack technical depth and scientific grounding. To address this issue, we propose MoRI ( Mo tivation-grounded R easoning for Scientific I deation), a framework that enables LLMs to explicitly learn the reasoning process from research motivations to methodologies. The base LLM is initialized via supervised fine-tuning to generate a research motivation from a given context, and is subsequently trained under a composite reinforcement learning reward that approximates scientific rigor: (1) entropy-aware information gain encourages the model to uncover and elaborate high-complexity technical details grounded in ground-truth methodologies, and (2) contrastive semantic gain constrains the reasoning trajectory to remain conceptually aligned with scientifically valid solutions. Empirical results show that MoRI consistently outperforms strong commercial LLMs and complex agentic baselines across multiple dimensions, including novelty, technical rigor, and feasibility. The code is available on GitHub.

Abstract:
Reasoning-oriented Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, yet they remain fundamentally limited by a blind self-thinking paradigm: performing extensive internal reasoning even when critical information is missing or ambiguous. We propose Proactive Interactive Reasoning (PIR), a new reasoning paradigm that transforms LLMs from passive solvers into proactive inquirers that interleave reasoning with clarification. Unlike existing search- or tool-based frameworks that primarily address knowledge uncertainty by querying external environments, PIR targets premise- and intent-level uncertainty through direct interaction with the user. PIR is implemented via two core components: (1) an uncertainty-aware supervised fine-tuning procedure that equips models with interactive reasoning capability, and (2) a user-simulator-based policy optimization framework driven by a composite reward that aligns model behavior with user intent. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing demonstrate that PIR consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving up to 32.70% higher accuracy, 22.90% higher pass rate, and 41.36 BLEU improvement, while reducing nearly half of the reasoning computation and unnecessary interaction turns. Further reliability evaluations on factual knowledge, question answering, and missing-premise scenarios confirm the strong generalization and robustness of PIR.

Abstract:
Neural transducers offer an alignment-free framework for speech-to-text modeling, and hierarchical transducer architectures further improve multilingual joint automatic speech recognition (ASR) and speech translation (ST) by stacking a translation-focused encoder on top of an ASR encoder. However, extending hierarchical transducers to multilingual many-to-many settings remains challenging: fully shared models often suffer from negative transfer and unstable target-language generation, while training separate models for each direction is computationally prohibitive. We propose LCMA-SRT (Language-Conditional Mixture-of-Experts Adapters for Speech Recognition and Translation), which augments a hierarchical transducer with language-conditional Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) adapters. A source-conditioned MoE adapter (SRC-MoE) uses source-language embeddings to reduce cross-language interference and improve multilingual ASR. A target-conditioned MoE adapter (TGT-MoE) uses the desired target language to reduce cross-target interference and stabilize target-language generation in many-to-many ST. Experiments on Europarl-ST (9 languages, 72 directions) show that LCMA-SRT improves both ASR and ST within a single joint model, reducing average WER and improving BLEU and COMET over strong hierarchical transducer baselines. We release our code and models at https://github.com/linanjie0820/LCMA-SRT .

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly applied to various development scenarios. However, in on-chain transaction scenarios, even a minor error can cause irreversible loss for users. Existing evaluations often overlook execution accuracy and safety. We introduce EVM-QuestBench, an execution-grounded benchmark for natural-language transaction-script generation on EVM-compatible chains. The benchmark employs dynamic evaluation: instructions are sampled from template pools, numeric parameters are drawn from predefined intervals, and validators verify outcomes against these instantiated values. EVM-QuestBench contains 107 tasks (62 atomic, 45 composite). Its modular architecture enables rapid task development. The runner executes scripts on a forked EVM chain with snapshot isolation; composite tasks apply step-efficiency decay. We evaluate 20 models with 5 independent rounds each and find large performance gaps, with split scores revealing persistent asymmetry between single-action precision and multi-step workflow completion. Code: https://github.com/OpenEdgeHQ/EVM-quest-bench .

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed in e-commerce shopping. To perform thorough, user-tailored product searches, agents should interpret personal preferences, engage in multi-turn dialogues, and ultimately retrieve and discriminate among highly similar products. However, existing research has yet to provide a unified simulation environment that consistently captures all of these aspects, and always focuses solely on evaluation benchmarks without training support. In this paper, we introduce ShopSimulator, a large-scale and challenging Chinese shopping environment. Leveraging ShopSimulator, we evaluate LLMs across diverse scenarios, finding that even the best-performing models achieve less than 40% full-success rate. Error analysis reveals that agents struggle with deep search and product selection in long trajectories, fail to balance the use of personalization cues, and to effectively engage with users. Further training exploration provides practical guidance for overcoming these weaknesses, with the combination of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) yielding significant performance improvements.

Abstract:
Static program slicing is a fundamental software engineering technique for isolating code relevant to specific variables. While recent learning-based approaches using language models (LMs) show promise in automating slice prediction, they suffer from inaccurate dependency modeling and unconstrained generation, where LMs fail to capture precise data flow relations and produce slices containing hallucinated tokens and statements. To address these challenges, we propose SliceFormer, a novel approach that reformulates static program slicing as a sequence-to-sequence task using small language models such as CodeT5+. introduces two key innovations that directly target the identified limitations. First, to improve dependency modeling, we design dataflow-aware pretraining objectives that leverage data flow graphs DFG to teach models data dependencies through dataflow-preserving statement permutation and dataflow-aware span corruption. Second, to eliminate hallucination, we develop a constrained decoding mechanism that enforces both lexical and syntactic constraints. We evaluate SliceFormer on Java and Python program slicing benchmarks, demonstrating consistent improvements over state-of-the-art baselines with up to 22% gain in ExactMatch.

Abstract:
Multimodal web agents can assist humans in operating repetitive GUI tasks, where effective task planning is essential for decomposing complex tasks into executable actions. While small open-source MLLMs are cost-efficient and privacy-preserving compared with commercial large models, they suffer from weak planning and limited cross-website generalization. To address these limitations, we introduce the planning experience exploration and utilization (PEEU) method, which autonomously explores environments to discover experiences and utilizes hindsight experience to synthesize strictly aligned, high-level training data. To quantitatively analyze the generalization behaviors driving this performance, we propose the task decomposition hierarchical analysis framework (TDHAF) to systematically study compositional generalization across three task granularities: low, middle and high levels. Our analysis reveals that mastering low-level atomic skills does not guarantee high-level planning competence, while high-level task training yields stronger OOD generalization. Experiments on real-world benchmarks demonstrate PEEU’s superior effectiveness: our 7B model achieves 30.6% accuracy, outperforming the much larger Qwen2.5-VL-32B model. These demonstrate constructing hindsight high-level tasks and leveraging experiences is crucial for OOD planning abilities of small MLLMs.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid advancement of LLMs, their performance on linguistically and culturally diverse minority languages within a unified national context remains underexplored. We present CMiLBench, a collection of hierarchical multitask benchmarks designed to translate theoretical notions of “diversity in unity” into practical evaluation for three representative Chinese minority languages: Tibetan, Mongolian, and Uyghur. CMiLBench comprises 24,663 instances across 5 difficulty levels and 17 tasks spanning foundational ability, cultural specificity, and safety alignment. We adopt existing dataset adaptation, minority knowledge construction, and high-resource benchmark translation to construct CMiLBench. We assess 14 state-of-the-art commercial and open-source LLMs with a hybrid framework that integrates automatic metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge scoring. The comparative experimental results reveal the gap between theoretical capability and practical utility. CMiLBench serves as a foundational and scalable evaluation resource to bridge the digital language divide and promote the informatization and intelligentization of low-resource Chinese minority languages.

Abstract:
Surprisal theory hypothesizes that the difficulty of human sentence processing increases linearly with surprisal, the negative log-probability of a word given its context. Computational psycholinguistics has tested this hypothesis using language models (LMs) as proxies for human prediction. While surprisal derived from recent neural LMs generally captures human processing difficulty on naturalistic corpora that predominantly consist of simple sentences, it severely underestimates processing difficulty on sentences that require syntactic disambiguation (garden-path effects). This leads to the claim that the processing difficulty of such sentences cannot be reduced to surprisal, although it remains possible that neural LMs simply differ from humans in next-word prediction. In this paper, we investigate whether it is truly impossible to construct a neural LM that can explain garden-path effects via surprisal. Specifically, instead of evaluating off-the-shelf neural LMs, we fine-tune these LMs on garden-path sentences so as to better align surprisal-based reading-time estimates with actual human reading times. Our results show that fine-tuned LMs do not overfit and successfully capture human reading slowdowns on held-out garden-path items; they even improve predictive power for human reading times on naturalistic corpora and preserve their general LM capabilities. These results provide an existence proof for a neural LM that can explain both garden-path effects and naturalistic reading times via surprisal, but also raise a theoretical question: what kind of evidence can truly falsify surprisal theory?

Abstract:
Recent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have advanced radiology report generation (RRG), yet two core limitations persist: (1) report-level rewards offer limited evidence-grounded guidance for clinical faithfulness; and (2) current methods lack an explicit self-improving mechanism to align with clinical preference. We introduce clinically aligned Evidence-aware Self-Correcting Reinforcement Learning (ESC-RL), comprising two key components. First, a Group-wise Evidence-aware Alignment Reward (GEAR) delivers group-wise, evidence-aware feedback. GEAR reinforces consistent grounding for true positives, recovers missed findings for false negatives, and suppresses unsupported content for false positives. Second, a Self-correcting Preference Learning (SPL) strategy automatically constructs a reliable, disease-aware preference dataset from multiple noisy observations and leverages an LLM to synthesize refined reports without human supervision. ESC-RL promotes clinically faithful, disease-aligned reward and supports continual self-improvement during training. Extensive experiments on two public chest X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent gains and state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) generate text by repeatedly unmasking a partially noised sequence in parallel, promising lower latency than autoregressive decoding. However, most discrete dLLMs still rely on fixed denoising schedules, which are non-adaptive to input difficulty and cannot learn efficient unmasking orders. This paper introduces a reinforcement learning (RL) framework that transforms dLLM decoding into a trajectory-aware, learnable policy. We propose a confidence-gated denoising strategy that dynamically decides which tokens to unmask and how many to unmask per step, enabling adaptive exploration of denoising trajectories. Building on Group Relative Policy Optimization, we reformulate it into a trajectory-aware variant, TA-GRPO- d , which combines a trajectory-level signal—captured as the z-score of the AUC over intermediate rewards—with a token-level unmasking-time weight. This design allows the model to learn not only the final output quality but also the efficiency of the decoding path itself. Experiments on MATH-500, Countdown, Sudoku, and code benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP) show that TA-GRPO- d maintains or improves accuracy while reducing average denoising steps by up to half, achieving both faster inference and lower computational cost. Our approach provides an RL framework for optimizing dLLM decoding policies toward adaptive, efficient reasoning. Code is available at our GitHub.

Abstract:
Test-time reinforcement learning mitigates the reliance on annotated data by using majority voting results as pseudo-labels, emerging as a complementary direction to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for improving reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs). However, this voting strategy often induces confirmation bias and suffers from sparse rewards, limiting the overall performance. In this work, we propose subgroup-specific step-wise confidence-weighted pseudo-label estimation (SCOPE), a framework integrating model confidence and dynamic subgroup partitioning to address these issues. Specifically, SCOPE integrates the proposed step-wise confidence into pseudo-label estimation, prioritizing high-quality reasoning paths over simple frequency count. Furthermore, it dynamically partitions the candidate outputs pool into independent subgroups by balancing reasoning quality against exploration diversity. By deriving local consensus via repeat sampling for each subgroup, SCOPE provides diverse supervision targets to encourage broader exploration. We conduct experiments across various models and benchmarks, experimental results show that SCOPE consistently outperforms recent baselines. Notably, SCOPE achieves relative improvements of 13.1% on challenging AIME 2025 and 8.1% on AMC.

Abstract:
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) advances flat document retrieval by structuring knowledge as relational graphs, enabling more coherent and effective reasoning. However, applying it to specific domains like legal reasoning faces critical challenges. (i) Legal corpora are heterogeneous, containing multi-granular knowledge from cases, articles and interpretations. A flat knowledge graph cannot adequately differentiate between factual details, applied rules, and abstract principles, limiting accurate retrieval. (ii) Reliable legal judgment demands transparent, evidence-based reasoning. Traditional RAG passes retrieved context directly to an LLM without verification, resulting in opaque, error-prone reasoning. To this end, we propose LegalGraphRAG, a framework designed for reliable legal reasoning. Our approach introduces two core components: a hierarchical legal graph that hierarchically organizes legal sources to enable retrieval at appropriate abstraction levels, and a multi-agent system for reliable legal reasoning, where a Researcher retrieves candidate evidence, an Auditor rigorously verifies its validity against source documents, and an Adjudicator synthesizes the set of verified evidence to render a final judgment. Extensive experiments show that LegalGraphRAG achieves the state-of-the-art performance, outperforming existing GraphRAG baselines in accurate and trustworthy legal analysis. Our code, datasets and implementation details are available at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/LegalGraphRAG.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a powerful paradigm for optimizing large language models (LLMs) to handle complex reasoning tasks. A core challenge in this process lies in managing policy entropy, which reflects the balance between exploration and exploitation during training. Existing methods, such as proximal policy optimization (PPO) and its variants, discard valuable gradient signals from low-probability tokens due to the clipping mechanism. We systematically analyze the entropy dynamics and reveal that these clipped tokens play a critical yet overlooked role in regulating entropy evolution. We propose Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Policy Optimization (CE-GPPO), a novel algorithm that reintroduces gradients from clipped tokens in native PPO in a gentle and bounded manner. By controlling the magnitude of gradients from tokens outside the clipping interval, CE-GPPO is able to achieve an exploration-exploitation trade-off. We provide theoretical justification and empirical evidence showing that CE-GPPO effectively mitigates entropy instability. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CE-GPPO consistently outperforms strong baselines across different model scales.

Abstract:
Quality Estimation (QE) aims to assess machine translation quality without reference translations, but recent studies have shown that existing QE models exhibit systematic gender bias. In particular, they tend to favor masculine realizations in gender-ambiguous contexts and may assign higher scores to gender-misaligned translations even when gender is explicitly specified. To address these issues, we propose FairQE, a multi-agent-based, fairness-aware QE framework that mitigates gender bias in both gender-ambiguous and gender-explicit scenarios. FairQE detects gender cues, generates gender-flipped translation variants, and combines conventional QE scores with LLM-based unbiased reasoning through a dynamic bias-aware aggregation mechanism. This design preserves the strengths of existing QE models while calibrating their gender-related biases in a plug-and-play manner. Extensive experiments across multiple gender bias evaluation settings demonstrate that FairQE consistently improves gender fairness over strong QE baselines. Moreover, under MQM-based meta-evaluation following the WMT 2023 Metrics Shared Task, FairQE achieves competitive or improved general QE performance. These results show that gender bias in QE can be effectively mitigated without sacrificing evaluation accuracy, enabling fairer and more reliable translation evaluation.

Abstract:
Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but often suffer from overthinking, generating overly long and redundant reasoning trajectories. To explore its essence, our empirical analysis reveals that LRMs are primarily limited to recognizing task properties (i.e., difficulty levels) like humans before solving the problem, leading to a one-size-fits-all reasoning strategy. This observation motivates a fundamental question: Can we explicitly bootstrap such ability to alleviate overthinking in LRMs? To this end, we propose Think-How-to-Think (TH2T), a novel two-stage fine-tuning strategy that progressively inspires LRMs’ difficulty cognition and redundancy cognition of LRMs. Specifically, we first inject Difficulty Dypnosis into output prefixes as cues for global, prospective reasoning strategy selection, stimulating the model’s sharper sensitivity to task complexity and adaptive control of reasoning depth. Then, we incorporate Redundancy Hypnosis into in-progress reasoning steps, which serve as local, retrospective signals for behavior correction by identifying and eliminating superfluous reasoning detours. Experiments across 7B/14B/32B models demonstrate that TH2T significantly reduces inference costs by over 70% on easy tasks and 40% on complex ones without compromising performance. The resultant models exhibit a nascent ability for difficulty-aware reasoning, effectively mitigating behaviors like excessive reflection and looping, thereby paving the way for more cognitively efficient LRMs.

Abstract:
Recent work has shown that narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs, a phenomenon termed emergent misalignment (EM). While concerning, these findings were limited to finetuning and activation steering, leaving out in-context learning (ICL). We therefore ask: does EM emerge in ICL? We find that it does: across four model families (Gemini, Kimi-K2, Grok, and Qwen), narrow in-context examples cause models to produce misaligned responses to benign, unrelated queries. With 16 in-context examples, EM rates range from 1% to 24% depending on model and domain, appearing with as few as 2 examples. Neither larger model scale nor explicit reasoning provides reliable protection, and larger models are typically even more susceptible. Next, we formulate and test a hypothesis, which explains in-context EM as conflict between safety objectives and context-following behavior. Consistent with this, instructing models to prioritize safety reduces EM while prioritizing context-following increases it. These findings establish ICL as a previously underappreciated vector for emergent misalignment that resists simple scaling-based solutions.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in text-guided audio generation have yielded promising results in diverse domains, including sound effects, speech, and music. However, jointly generating speech with environmental audio remains challenging due to the inherent disparities in their acoustic patterns and temporal dynamics. We propose ImmersiveTTS, an environment-aware text-to-speech (TTS) model that generates natural speech seamlessly integrated within environmental contexts by explicitly modeling cross-modal interactions. Our model builds on a multimodal diffusion transformer and fuses transcript-aligned speech latent with text-conditioned environmental context via joint attention. To enhance semantic consistency, we introduce a domain-specific representation alignment objective tailored to environment-aware TTS, leveraging complementary self-supervised representations from speech and audio encoders. Experimental results show that ImmersiveTTS achieves higher naturalness, intelligibility, and audio fidelity than existing approaches across objective metrics and human listening tests.

Abstract:
The quadratic complexity and indefinitely growing key-value (KV) cache of standard Transformers pose a major barrier to long-context processing. To overcome this, we introduce the Collaborative Memory Transformer (CoMeT), a novel architecture that enables LLMs to handle arbitrarily long sequences with constant memory usage and linear time complexity. Designed as an efficient, plug-in module, CoMeT can be integrated into pre-trained models with only minimal fine-tuning. It operates on sequential data chunks, using a dual-memory system to manage context: a temporary memory on a FIFO queue for recent events, and a global memory with a gated update rule for long-range dependencies. These memories then act as a dynamic soft prompt for the next chunk. The effectiveness of our approach is remarkable: a model equipped with CoMeT and fine-tuned on 32k contexts can accurately retrieve a passkey from any position within a 1M token sequence. On the SCROLLS benchmark, CoMeT surpasses other efficient methods and achieves performance comparable to a full-attention baseline on summarization tasks. Its practical effectiveness is further validated on real-world agent and user behavior QA tasks, supported by a novel layer-level pipeline parallel training strategy that enables fine-tuning on extremely long contexts. The code is available at: https://github.com/LivingFutureLab/Comet

Abstract:
Recent advances in Graphical User Interface (GUI) and embodied navigation have driven progress, yet these domains have largely evolved in isolation, with disparate datasets and training paradigms. In this paper, we observe that both tasks can be formulated as Markov Decision Processes (MDP), suggesting a foundational principle for their unification. Hence, we present NaviMaster, the first unified agent capable of unifying GUI navigation and embodied navigation within a single framework. Specifically, NaviMaster (i) proposes a visual-target trajectory collection pipeline that generates trajectories for both GUI and embodied tasks using a single formulation. (ii) employs a unified reinforcement learning framework on the mix data to improve generalization. (iii) designs a novel distance-aware reward to ensure efficient learning from the trajectories. Through extensive experiments on out-of-domain benchmarks, NaviMaster is shown to outperform state-of-the-art agents in GUI navigation, spatial affordance prediction, and embodied navigation. Ablation studies further demonstrate the efficacy of our unified training strategy, data mixing strategy, and reward design. Resources will be released to the community.

Abstract:
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have recently achieved strong performance across various audio-centric tasks. However, hallucination, where models generate responses that are semantically incorrect or acoustically unsupported, remains largely underexplored in the audio domain. Existing hallucination benchmarks mainly focus on text or vision, while the few audio-oriented studies are limited in scale, modality coverage, and diagnostic depth. We therefore introduce HalluAudio, the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating hallucinations across speech, environmental sound, and music. HalluAudio comprises over 5K human-verified QA pairs and spans diverse task types, including binary judgments, multi-choice reasoning, attribute verification, and open-ended QA. To systematically induce hallucinations, we design adversarial prompts and mixed-audio conditions. Beyond accuracy, our evaluation protocol measures hallucination rate, yes/no bias, error-type analysis, and refusal rate, enabling a fine-grained analysis of LALM failure modes. We benchmark a broad range of open-source and proprietary models, providing the first large-scale comparison across speech, sound, and music. Our results reveal significant deficiencies in acoustic grounding, temporal reasoning, and music attribute understanding, underscoring the need for reliable and robust LALMs.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a parameter-efficient approach for fine-tuning large language models. However, conventional LoRA adapters are typically trained for a single task, limiting their applicability in real-world settings, where inputs may span multiple, diverse task domains. At inference time, existing methods can combine multiple LoRAs to improve cross-task performance, but they require additional labeled data or task-specific training, which is expensive at scale.In this work, we introduce LoRA on the Go (LoGo), a training-free framework that dynamically selects and merges adapters at the instance level without any additional requirements. LoGo leverages signals extracted from a single forward pass through LoRA adapters, to identify the most relevant adapters and determine their contributions on-the-fly. Across 5 NLP benchmarks, 27 datasets, and 3 model families, LoGo outperforms training-based baselines on some tasks upto a margin of 3.6% while remaining competitive on other tasks and maintaining inference throughput, highlighting its effectiveness and practicality.

Abstract:
Federated fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) provides a privacy-preserving approach to deploying pervasive generative AI services, yet the substantial memory overhead of first-order (FO) gradient computation presents significant practical challenges. While zeroth-order (ZO) optimization methods offer memory-efficient alternatives, they remain susceptible to performance degradation brought by data heterogeneity. Specifically, direct ZO-for-FO substitution is incompatible with existing strategies tailored for cross-client discrepancies. In response, we propose a new federated LLM fine-tuning framework, with a holistic revamped design of the entire ZO gradient processing pipeline. Crucially, with our proposed global adaptive optimization and local personalized perturbation, we present a unified solution for incorporating ZO gradients in federated learning, from local personalized perturbation sampling and ZO gradient transmission, to global ZO gradient reconstruction and aggregation with adaptive momentum, thereby directly addressing the challenges of inefficiencies and cross-client discrepancies. Our convergence analysis and experiment results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed framework over diverse heterogeneous data settings, both in terms of generalization and efficiency.

Abstract:
Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) focuses on extracting sentiment at a fine-grained aspect level and has been widely applied across real-world domains. However, existing ABSA research relies on coarse-grained categorical labels (e.g., positive, negative), which limits its ability to capture nuanced affective states. To address this limitation, we adopt a dimensional approach that represents sentiment with continuous valence–arousal (VA) scores, enabling fine-grained analysis at both the aspect and sentiment levels. To this end, we introduce DimABSA, the first multilingual, dimensional ABSA resource annotated with both traditional ABSA elements (aspect terms, aspect categories, and opinion terms) and newly introduced VA scores. This resource contains 76,958 aspect instances across 42,590 sentences, spanning six languages and four domains. We further introduce three subtasks that combine VA scores with different ABSA elements, providing a bridge from traditional ABSA to dimensional ABSA. Given that these subtasks involve both categorical and continuous outputs, we propose a new unified metric, continuous F1 (cF1), which incorporates VA prediction error into standard F1. We provide a comprehensive benchmark using both prompted and fine-tuned large language models across all subtasks. Our results show that DimABSA is a challenging benchmark and provides a foundation for advancing multilingual dimensional ABSA. We publicly released the DimABSA dataset, which was used for Track A of SemEval-2026 Task 3, attracting over 300 participants.

Abstract:
We present M 3 -VQA, a novel knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmark, to enhance the evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in fine-grained multimodal entity understanding and complex multi-hop reasoning. Unlike existing VQA datasets that focus on coarse-grained categories and simple reasoning over single entities, M 3 -VQA introduces diverse multi-entity questions involving multiple distinct entities from both visual and textual sources. It requires models to perform both sequential and parallel multi-hop reasoning across multiple documents, supported by traceable, detailed evidence and a curated multimodal knowledge base. We evaluate 16 leading MLLMs under three settings: without external knowledge, with gold evidence, and with retrieval-augmented input. The poor results reveal significant challenges for MLLMs in knowledge acquisition and reasoning. Models perform poorly without external information but improve markedly when provided with precise evidence. Furthermore, reasoning-aware agentic retrieval surpasses heuristic methods, highlighting the importance of structured reasoning for complex multimodal understanding. M 3 -VQA presents a more challenging evaluation for advancing the multimodal reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/M3VQA.

Abstract:
Self-report questionnaires remain the default tool for probing the psychological characteristics of Large Language Model (LLM) agents, yet classical instruments (BFI, BDI, MBTI, BSS) inherit three well-known threats under LLMs: contamination from training corpora, directional bias under social-desirability framing, and limited responsiveness to context beyond the item text. We ask whether a projective paradigm can be adapted into a usable psychometric tool for LLM agents. We introduce GenPT (Generative Projective Testing), which reformulates TAT, Rorschach, and SCT with newly generated stimuli and organises assessment as a three-stage pipeline (Behavior Collection → Interpretation → Diagnosis) grounded in SCORS-G and a Simplified Rorschach Analysis System. On personality traits (Big Five, MBTI) and mental-health risks (depression, suicide ideation), questionnaires exhibit systematic directional shifts under social-desirability framing, most strongly on suicide ideation, whereas GenPT’s collected behavioral patterns stay near the symmetric baseline; under a longitudinal counselling context, GenPT-based depression assessment shifts by roughly an order of magnitude more than its questionnaire counterpart. Questionnaires remain competitive on clean-persona trait tasks where items align lexically with the persona description. Overall, GenPT complements rather than replaces self-report when contamination resistance, bias asymmetry, and context sensitivity matter. Code and stimuli: https://github.com/sci-m-wang/GenPT.

Abstract:
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are expensive to pretrain and often suffer from imbalances across languages and datasets, English-centric bias, tokenizer oversegmentation for morphologically rich low-resource languages, and the curse of multilinguality. We introduce PARAMANU, a family of Indian language-only autoregressive language models trained from scratch on open-source language-specific data for the five most spoken Indian languages: Bangla (Bengali), Hindi, Marathi, Tamil, and Telugu. All models are designed for affordability and are trained on a single GPU with a budget under 1,000, allowing under-resourced researchers to build competitive language models. To address low-resource challenges, we develop morphology-aligned, low-fertility tokenizers, and propose an interpolation-based method for token position indices in RoPE based scaling to train longer sequences efficiently. We also create instruction-tuning datasets in Bangla that are then translated to the other four languages. Despite their small size (108M-367M parameters), Paramanu achieves a strong performance-efficiency tradeoff and outperforms most larger multilingual models up to 8B across all five languages. The models and datasets are available at: https://huggingface.co/collections/mitodru/paramanu.

Abstract:
Despite scaling to massive context windows, Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with multi-hop reasoning due to inherent position bias, which causes them to overlook information at certain positions. Whether these failures stem from an inability to locate evidence (recognition failure) or integrate it (synthesis failure) is unclear. We introduce Multi-Focus Attention Instruction (MFAI), a semantic probe to disentangle these mechanisms by explicitly steering attention towards selected positions. Across 5 LLMs on two multi-hop QA tasks (MuSiQue and NeoQA), we identify the "Weakest Link Effect": in our 18-document, 3-bucket setting, multi-hop reasoning performance collapses to the level of the least visible evidence, governed by absolute position rather than the linear distance between facts. While matched MFAI resolves recognition bottlenecks, improving accuracy by up to 11.49% in low-visibility positions, misleading MFAI yields divergent effects modulated by task topology: entity-centric tasks with vertical reasoning chains are vulnerable, whereas event-centric tasks with horizontal evidence structures are more resilient. Finally, we demonstrate that "thinking" models utilizing System-2 reasoning effectively locate and integrate the required information, matching gold-only baselines even in noisy, long-context settings. Supplementary experiments on 2WikiMultiHopQA, extended 3-4 hop counts, and a 32B model confirm these findings generalize across datasets, reasoning depths, and model scales.

Abstract:
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful tools for learning over structured data, including text-attributed graphs (TAGs), which are common in domains such as citation networks, social platforms, and knowledge graphs. GNNs are not inherently interpretable and thus, many explanation methods have been proposed. However, existing explanation methods often struggle to generate interpretable, fine-grained rationales, especially when node attributes include rich natural language. In this work, we introduce GSPELL, a lightweight, post-hoc framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to generate faithful and interpretable explanations for GNN predictions. GSPELL projects GNN node embeddings into the LLM embedding space and constructs hybrid prompts that interleave soft prompts with textual inputs from the graph structure. This enables the LLM to reason about GNN internal representations and to produce natural-language explanations, along with concise explanation subgraphs. Our experiments across real-world TAG datasets demonstrate that GSPELL achieves a favorable trade-off between fidelity and sparsity, while improving human-centric metrics such as insightfulness. GSPELL sets a new direction for LLM-based explainability in graph learning by aligning GNN internals with human reasoning.

Abstract:
The growing scale of online misinformation urgently demands Automated Fact-Checking (AFC). Existing benchmarks for evaluating AFC systems, however, are largely limited in terms of task scope, modalities, domain, language diversity, realism, or coverage of misinformation types. Critically, they are static, thus subject to data leakage as their claims enter the pretraining corpora of LLMs. As a result, benchmark performance no longer reliably reflects the actual ability to verify claims.We introduce Verified Theses and Statements (VeriTaS), the first dynamic benchmark for multimodal AFC, designed to remain robust under ongoing large-scale pretraining of foundation models. VeriTaS currently comprises 25,000 real-world claims from 104 professional fact-checking organizations across 54 languages, covering textual and audiovisual content. Claims are added quarterly via a fully automated seven-stage pipeline that normalizes claim formulation, retrieves original media, and maps heterogeneous expert verdicts to a novel, standardized, and disentangled scoring scheme with textual justifications.Through human evaluation, we demonstrate that the automated annotations closely match human judgments.We commit to updating VeriTaS in the future, establishing a leakage-resistant benchmark, supporting meaningful AFC evaluation in the era of rapidly evolving foundation models.The code and data are publicly available under https://veritas.mai.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de.

Abstract:
Long chain-of-thought (CoT) trajectories provide rich supervision signals for distilling reasoning from teacher to student LLMs. However, both prior work and our experiments show that trajectories from stronger teachers do not necessarily yield better students, highlighting the importance of data-student suitability in distillation. Existing methods assess suitability primarily through student likelihood, favoring trajectories that align closely with the student model’s current behavior but overlooking more informative ones. Addressing this, we propose Rank–Surprisal Ratio (RSR), a simple metric that captures both alignment and informativeness to assess the suitability of a reasoning trajectory. RSR is motivated by the observation that effective trajectories typically balance learning signal strength and behavioral alignment by combining low absolute probability with relatively high-ranked tokens under the student model.Concretely, RSR is defined as the ratio of a trajectory’s average token-wise rank to its average negative log-likelihood, and is straightforward to compute and interpret. Across five student models and reasoning trajectories from 11 diverse teachers, RSR strongly correlates with post-training reasoning performance (average Spearman 0.86), consistently outperforming existing metrics. We further demonstrate its practical utility in both trajectory selection and teacher selection.

Abstract:
Despite representing nearly one-third of the world’s languages, African languages remain critically underserved by modern NLP technologies, with 88% classified as severely underrepresented or completely ignored in computational linguistics. We present the African Languages Lab (All Lab), a comprehensive research initiative that addresses this technological gap through systematic data collection, model development, and empirical analysis. Our contributions include: (1) a quality-controlled data collection pipeline, yielding the largest validated African multi-modal speech and text dataset spanning 40 languages with 19 billion text tokens and 12,628 hours of aligned speech data; (2) extensive experimental validation demonstrating that even modest-scale models, when fine-tuned on targeted language data, achieve substantial improvements over untrained baselines, averaging +23.69 ChrF++, +0.33 COMET, and +15.34 BLEU points across 31 evaluated languages; and (3) a comparative analysis against Google Translate in which a 1B-parameter model matched or surpassed the commercial system in several languages including Yoruba and Twi, revealing that data scarcity, rather than model scale, constitutes the primary bottleneck for low-resource NLP, and suggesting that systematic dataset development yields disproportionate returns for low-resource languages.

Abstract:
Accelerating the inference of large language models (LLMs) has been a critical challenge in generative AI. Speculative decoding (SD) substantially improves LLM inference efficiency. However, its utility is limited by a fundamental constraint: the draft and target models must share the same vocabulary, thus limiting the herd of available draft models and often necessitating the training of a new model from scratch. Inspired by Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), a classic algorithm for aligning time series, we propose the algorithm TokenTiming for universal speculative decoding. It operates by re-encoding the draft token sequence to get a new target token sequence, and then uses DTW to build a mapping to transfer the probability distributions for speculative sampling. Benefiting from this, our method accommodates mismatched vocabularies and works with any off-the-shelf models without retraining and modification. We conduct comprehensive experiments on various tasks, demonstrating 1.57x speedup. This work enables a universal approach for draft model selection, making SD a more versatile and practical tool for LLM acceleration.

Abstract:
Recent breakthroughs in Transformer-based large models, have driven widespread tasks, yet their reliance on centralized cloud deployment raises significant privacy risks due to sensitive data exposure. While edge-based collaborative inference offers a privacy-preserving alternative, existing methods face critical limitations: static model partitioning cannot adapt to dynamic edge resource fluctuations, and rigid multi-head attention handling overlooks semantic-critical prioritization and parallelism. We propose EdgeFormer, a latency-aware framework for distributed Transformer inference in resource-constrained edge networks. EdgeFormer dynamically allocates model blocks across devices via efficiency-storage trade-off optimization and introduces collaborative Multi-Head Attention (cMHA), which distributes semantic-critical attention heads across devices while pruning redundant ones under real-time constraints. We further develop LiScore, a composite metric integrating attention diversity and latency costs, alongside a similarity-based retrieval method to reduce recomputation overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EdgeFormer achieves up to 2.01 \× inference acceleration over state-of-the-art baselines with \\leq 1.06% accuracy loss, maintaining robustness under varying edge conditions.

Abstract:
Learning robust representations of authorial style is crucial for authorship attribution and AI-generated text detection. However, existing methods often struggle with content-style entanglement, where models learn spurious correlations between authors’ writing styles and topics, leading to poor generalization across domains. To address this challenge, we propose Explainable Authorship Variational Autoencoder (EAVAE), a novel framework that explicitly disentangles style from content through architectural separation-by-design. EAVAE first pretrains style encoders using supervised contrastive learning on diverse authorship data, then finetunes with a Variational Autoencoder (VEA) architecture using separate encoders for style and content representations. Disentanglement is enforced through a novel discriminator that not only distinguishes whether pairs of style/content representations belong to the same or different authors/content sources, but also generates natural language explanation for their decision, simultaneously mitigating confounding information and enhancing interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of EAVAE. On authorship attribution, we achieve state-of-the-art performance on various datasets, including Amazon Reviews, PAN21, and HRS. For AI-generated text detection, EAVAE excels in few-shot learning over the M4 dataset.

Abstract:
Despite the growing use of large language models (LLMs) for writing tasks, users may hesitate to rely on LLMs when personal style is important. Post-editing LLM-generated drafts or translations is a common collaborative writing strategy, but it remains unclear whether users can effectively reshape LLM-generated text to reflect their personal style. We conduct a pre-registered online study ( n=81 ) in which participants post-edit LLM-generated drafts for writing tasks where personal style matters to them. Using embedding-based style similarity metrics, we find that post-editing increases stylistic similarity to participants’ unassisted writing and reduces similarity to fully LLM-generated output. However, post-edited text still remains stylistically closer in style to LLM text than to participants’ unassisted control text, and it exhibits reduced stylistic diversity compared to unassisted human text. We find a gap between perceived stylistic authenticity and model-measured stylistic similarity, with post-edited text often perceived as representative of participants’ personal style despite remaining detectable LLM stylistic traces.

Abstract:
Recent research shows that LLM Agents can generate “believable” human behaviors via prompt-only methods, and such agents have been increasingly adopted in downstream applications. However, existing evaluation of these agents only focuses on qualitative believability (whether human raters think they are accurate), leaving open questions of whether LLM agents can accurately generate step-by-step actions mimicking a particular human’s behavior in a multi-turn interaction task. In this work, we take shopping as a case study and present the first large-scale quantitative evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs’ ability to accurately simulate human behavior. Using real-world data from 31,865 online shopping sessions containing 230,965 user actions, our evaluation reveals that prompt-based LLMs (DeepSeek-R1, Llama, Claude) achieve only 11.86% accuracy in generating human actions, highlighting a substantial gap in actual behavioral accuracy. Through experiments, we also showcase that strategies as simple as fine-tuning LLMs on real human click-through data augmented with synthesized reasoning traces can greatly enhance models’ performance. The fine-tuned Qwen2.5-7B achieves 17.26% action generation accuracy and 33.86% F1 score on final purchase prediction, representing substantial improvements of 5.4% and 13.85% over prompt-only baselines. This work establishes the first rigorous benchmark and dataset for human behavior simulation and provides actionable insights for developing more accurate LLM agents for future downstream applications.

Abstract:
Reviewer assignment is increasingly critical yet challenging in the LLM era, where rapid topic shifts render many pre-2023 benchmarks outdated and where proxy signals poorly reflect true reviewer familiarity. We address this evaluation bottleneck by introducing LR-bench, a high-fidelity, up-to-date benchmark curated from 2024–2025 AI/NLP manuscripts with five-level self-assessed familiarity ratings collected via a large-scale email survey, yielding 1,055 expert-annotated paper–reviewer–score annotations. We further propose a reviewer-centric ranking framework that distills each reviewer’s recent publications into compact keyword-based profiles and fine-tunes an embedding model with weak preference supervision constructed from heuristic retrieval signals, enabling to match each manuscript against a reviewer profile directly. Across the LR-bench and the CMU gold-standard dataset, our approach consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming strong embedding baselines by a clear margin. We release LR-bench at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Gnociew/LR-bench, and an github repository at https://github.com/Gnociew/RATE-Reviewer-Assignment.

Abstract:
The pursuit of real-time agentic interaction has driven interest in Diffusion-based Large Language Models (dLLMs) as alternatives to auto-regressive backbones, promising to break the sequential latency bottleneck. However, does such efficiency gains translate into effective agentic behavior? In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of dLLMs (e.g., LLaDA, Dream) across two distinct agentic paradigms: Embodied Agents (requiring long-horizon planning) and Tool-Calling Agents (requiring precise formatting).Contrary to the efficiency hype, our results on Agentboard and BFCL reveal a "bitter lesson": current dLLMs fail to serve as reliable agentic backbones, frequently leading to systematically failure. (1) In Embodied settings, dLLMs suffer repeated attempts, failing to branch under temporal feedback. (2) In Tool-Calling settings, dLLMs fail to maintain symbolic precision (e.g. strict JSON schemas) under diffusion noise. To assess the potential of dLLMs in agentic workflows, we introduce DiffuAgent, a multi-agent evaluation framework that integrates dLLMs as plug-and-play cognitive cores. Our analysis shows that dLLMs are effective in non-causal roles (e.g., memory summarization and tool selection) but require the incorporation of causal, precise, and logically grounded reasoning mechanisms into the denoising process to be viable for agentic tasks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents that invoke external tools through structured function calls. While recent work reports strong tool-calling performance under standard English-centric evaluations, the robustness of tool calling under multilingual user interactions remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce MLCL, a diagnostic benchmark, and conduct a systematic evaluation of multilingual tool calling across Chinese, Hindi, and the low-resource language Igbo. Through fine-grained error analysis, we show that many failures occur despite correct intent understanding and tool selection. We identify parameter value language mismatch as a dominant failure mode, where models generate semantically appropriate parameter values in the user’s language, violating language-invariant execution conventions. We further evaluate several inference-time system strategies and find that while these strategies substantially reduce language-induced execution errors, none of them can fully recover English-level performance.

Abstract:
While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are designed to enhance factual fidelity by grounding LLMs in provided sources, the application of current watermarking techniques creates a paradoxical failure mode. These methods, being inherently fact-agnostic, force the model to deviate from the very source documents it is supposed to follow. This leads to “faithfulness hallucinations"—a critical flaw where the generated output contradicts its own grounding context. Consequently, these watermarks undermine the core value of RAG, rendering even the most secure schemes untrustworthy for high-stakes applications. To resolve this RAG-specific conflict, we introduce the Dual Factual Shield (DFS) framework, a novel architecture designed to enforce knowledge loyalty. The DFS framework employs a defense-in-depth strategy through two synergistic layers: a source-anchored algorithmic safeguard that shields critical terms from the retrieved context, and prompt-based semantic guidance that protects against factual corruption. To demonstrate its effectiveness, we enhance a state-of-the-art, spoofing-aware contrastive watermarking baseline with our framework. Experiments show that our framework drastically reduces the Knowledge Corruption Rate (KCR)—a new metric we introduce—while preserving its original high security and robustness. This work establishes a new paradigm for watermarking, evolving it from merely secure to truly trustworthy. We demonstrate that traceability and truth can, and must, coexist, paving the way for the responsible deployment of traceable AI in knowledge-critical domains.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable progress in pragmatic language understanding, prior research has focused mainly on their comprehension of verbal behavior. Nonetheless, non-verbal behavior remains a fundamental component of human communication, especially when deliberately utilized in isolation to convey indirect meanings. In this work, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLMs’ ability to infer pragmatic meaning in dialogue consisting solely of non-verbal responses. We explore three research questions: (1) Can LLMs recognize indirect intent conveyed through non-verbal responses? (2) When and how do LLMs fail to capture non-verbal intent? (3) How can we improve LLMs’ ability to interpret non-verbal intent?. Through the evaluation, we observe that LLMs struggle to infer underlying meaning from non-verbal responses, with accuracy dropping by up to 60% points compared to verbal ones. Further extensive analysis reveals a behavioral pattern in LLMs’ interpretations of non-verbal behavior and demonstrates that in-context learning facilitates pragmatic inference.

Abstract:
Recently, AI-driven interactions with computing devices have advanced from basic prototype tools to sophisticated, LLM-based systems that emulate human-like operations in graphical user interfaces. We are now witnessing the emergence of Computer-Using Agents (CUAs), capable of autonomously performing tasks such as navigating desktop applications, web pages, and mobile apps. However, as these agents grow in capability, they also introduce novel safety and security risks. Vulnerabilities in LLM-driven reasoning, with the added complexity of integrating multiple software components and multimodal inputs, further complicate the security landscape. In this paper, we present a systematization of knowledge on the safety and security threats of CUAs. We conduct a comprehensive literature review and distill our findings along four research objectives: (i) define the CUA that suits safety analysis; (ii) categorize current safety threats among CUAs; (iii) propose a comprehensive taxonomy of existing defensive strategies; (iv) summarize prevailing benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation metrics used to assess the safety and performance of CUAs. Building on these insights, our work provides future researchers with a structured foundation for exploring unexplored vulnerabilities and offers practitioners actionable guidance in designing and deploying secure Computer-Using Agents.

Abstract:
Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction (DSRE) remains a long-standing challenge in NLP, where models must learn from noisy bag-level annotations while making sentence-level predictions. While existing state-of-the-art (SoTA) DSRE models rely on task-specific training, their integration with in-context learning (ICL) using large language models (LLMs) remains underexplored. A key challenge is that the LLM may not learn relation semantics correctly, due to noisy annotation.In response, we propose HYDRE – HY brid D istantly Supervised R elation E xtraction framework. It first uses a trained DSRE model to identify the top- k candidate relations for a given test sentence, then uses a novel dynamic exemplar retrieval strategy that extracts reliable, sentence-level exemplars from training data, which are then provided in LLM prompt for outputting the final relation(s).We further extend HYDRE to cross-lingual settings for RE in low-resource languages. Using available English DSRE training data, we evaluate all methods on English as well as a newly curated benchmark covering four diverse low-resource Indic languages - Oriya, Santali, Manipuri, and Tulu. HYDRE achieves up to 20 F1 point gains in English and, on average, 17 F1 points on Indic languages over prior SoTA DSRE models and naive prompting baselines. Detailed ablations exhibit HYDRE ’s efficacy compared to other prompting strategies.

Abstract:
We introduce NSF-SciFy, a comprehensive dataset of scientific claims and investigation proposals extracted from National Science Foundation award abstracts. While previous scientific claim verification datasets have been limited in size and scope, NSF-SciFy represents a significant advance with 2.8 million claims from 400,000 abstracts spanning all science and mathematics disciplines. We present two focused subsets: NSF-SciFy-MatSci with 114,000 claims from materials science awards, and NSF-SciFy-20K with 135,000 claims across five NSF directorates. Using zero-shot prompting, we develop a scalable approach for joint extraction of scientific claims and investigation proposals. We demonstrate the dataset’s utility through three downstream tasks: non-technical abstract generation, claim extraction, and investigation proposal extraction. Fine-tuning language models on our dataset yields substantial improvements, with relative gains often exceeding 100%, particularly for claim and proposal extraction tasks. Our error analysis reveals that extracted claims exhibit high precision but lower recall, suggesting opportunities for further methodological refinement. NSF-SciFy enables new research directions in large-scale claim verification, scientific discovery tracking, and meta-scientific analysis.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive progress on vision language benchmarks, yet their capacity for cognitive and psychological reasoning remains largely unexplored. We introduce Mind’s Eye, a multiple-choice benchmark of eight visuo-cognitive tasks inspired by classic human intelligence tests and organized under a novel A–R–T taxonomy: Abstraction , Relation , and Transformation . The tasks probe core processes of fluid intelligence such as pattern induction, analogical Relation mapping, and mental Transformation. We evaluate a diverse suite of closed-source and open-source MLLMs and compare their performance with human participants. Humans achieve 80% accuracy, while top performing MLLMs remain below 50% . Error analysis reveals failures in (i) visual attention allocation, (ii) internal perceptual manipulation, (iii) over reliance on domain priors, and (iv) weak abstraction of underlying visual concepts. Our findings suggest that current MLLMs exhibit limited fluid reasoning and visuo-cognitive integration compared with human participants, highlighting the need for cognitively grounded evaluation frameworks like Mind’s Eye.

Abstract:
Extracting structured information from visual documents (Visual Information Extraction, VIE) is a cornerstone of business automation. While recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities, existing benchmarks suffer from critical limitations in scale and realism, lack semantic granularity, and fail to cover diverse document types. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReceiptBench, a large-scale, human-annotated benchmark consisting of 10k diverse receipts, organizing information extraction into four hierarchical sub-tasks: (1) Basic Perception for raw text spotting, (2) Format Normalization for strictly following standardization instructions, (3) Semantic Reasoning for inferring implicit attributes from context, and (4) Structure Parsing for handling nested line items. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage training framework incorporating Metric-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which translates rigorous evaluation constraints into reinforcement learning signals to enhance structural consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method yields state-of-the-art performance, surpassing leading proprietary models on complex reasoning tasks. We release our datasets and code at https://github.com/wwwT0ri/ReceiptBench.

Abstract:
The computational cost of training multimodal large language models (MLLMs) grows rapidly with the number of processed tokens. Existing efficiency methods mainly target inference via token reduction or merging, offering limited benefits during training. We introduce ReGATE (Reference-Guided Adaptive Token Elision), an adaptive token pruning method for accelerating MLLM training. ReGATE adopts a teacher-student framework, in which a frozen teacher LLM provides per-token guidance losses that are fused with an exponential moving average of the student’s difficulty estimates. This adaptive scoring mechanism dynamically selects informative tokens while skipping redundant ones in the forward pass, substantially reducing computation without altering the model architecture. Across three representative MLLMs, ReGATE matches the peak accuracy of standard training on MVBench up to 2 × faster, using only 38% of the tokens. With extended training, it even surpasses the baseline across multiple multimodal benchmarks, cutting total token usage by over 41%. Code and models will be released publicly.

Abstract:
Visual segmentation, the task of segmenting an image into semantically meaningful regions, is a cornerstone in machine learning and has widespread applications in industry. Nevertheless, visual segmentation with instruction has been a challenging task for many years. This largely stems from the cross-modal discrepancy between language and image domains, resulting in difficulty in relating the instruction semantics and the pixel-level predictions. In recent years, the remarkable reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have spurred a new wave of research aiming to bridge the disparity between natural language instructions and pixel-level understanding. This survey offers the first comprehensive overview of the rapidly evolving field of LLM-driven visual segmentation. We categorize existing approaches based on their core objectives and methodologies, including reasoning-based segmentation, open-vocabulary segmentation, grounding techniques connecting language to pixels, and extensions to video domains. We review recent seminal works in LLM-based visual segmentation, analyzing their architectural innovations, training strategies, and benchmark performance. Furthermore, we discuss the common datasets, evaluation metrics, and identify key challenges and promising future directions at the intersection of language and visual segmentation. We hope this survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners seeking to understand the current landscape and future directions of leveraging LLMs for sophisticated visual segmentation tasks and applications. The resource summary is available at https://github.com/wyzjack/Awesome-LLM-Visual-Segmentation.

Abstract:
Limited access to mental healthcare, extended wait times, and increasing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led individuals to turn to LLMs for fulfilling their mental health needs. However, examining the multi-turn mental health conversation capabilities of LLMs remains under-explored. Existing evaluation frameworks typically focus on diagnostic accuracy and win-rates and often overlook alignment with patient-specific goals, values, and personalities required for meaningful conversations. To address this, we introduce MedAgent, a novel framework for synthetically generating realistic, multi-turn mental health sensemaking conversations and use it to create the Mental Health Sensemaking Dialogue (MHSD) dataset, comprising over 2,200 patient–LLM conversations. Additionally, we present MultiSenseEval, a holistic framework to evaluate the multi-turn conversation abilities of LLMs in healthcare settings using human-centric criteria. Our findings reveal that frontier reasoning models yield below-par performance for patient-centric communication and struggle at precise ("hard") diagnostic capabilities with average accuracy of ~31%. Additionally, we observed variation in model performance based on patient’s persona and performance drop with increasing turns in the conversation. Our work provides a comprehensive synthetic data generation framework, a dataset and evaluation framework for assessing LLMs in multi-turn mental health conversations.

Abstract:
The rapid evolution of software libraries poses a considerable hurdle for code generation, necessitating continuous adaptation to frequent version updates while preserving backward compatibility. While existing code evolution benchmarks provide valuable insights, they typically lack execution-based evaluation for generating code compliant with specific library versions. To address this, we introduce GitChameleon 2.0, a novel, meticulously curated dataset comprising 328 Python code completion problems, each conditioned on specific library versions and accompanied by executable unit tests. GitChameleon 2.0 rigorously evaluates the capacity of contemporary large language models (LLMs), LLM-powered agents, code assistants, and RAG systems to perform version-conditioned code generation that demonstrates functional accuracy through execution. Our extensive evaluations indicate that state-of-the-art systems encounter significant challenges with this task; enterprise models achieving baseline success rates in the 48-51% range, underscoring the intricacy of the problem. By offering an execution-based benchmark emphasizing the dynamic nature of code libraries, GitChameleon 2.0 enables a clearer understanding of this challenge and helps guide the development of more adaptable and dependable AI code generation methods.

Abstract:
With the growing popularity of virtual character platforms like Character.AI, users are increasingly turning to role-playing agents for emotional support in daily life. Yet existing research mainly focuses on character consistency in fictional or game-based scenarios, overlooking user-centered interactions such as companionship and psychological support. To bridge this gap, we propose Emotionally Supportive Role-Playing (ESRP), a framework designed to align role-playing with real-world user scenarios and emotional needs. We focus on typical users of these platforms, i.e., anime enthusiasts—including students, office workers, freelancers, and self-employed individuals—and design scenario-based questions that reflect their everyday struggles such as work stress and social loneliness. Through a two-round data collection involving 40 anime fans and 10 Large Language Models (LLMs), we build ChatAnime: the first ESRP dataset with 2,400 human-written and 24,000 LLM-generated responses, supported by over 132,000 fine-grained human annotations. We also provide the ESRP evaluation framework featuring 9 fine-grained metrics across three dimensions: basic dialogue, role-playing and emotional support, along with an overall metric for diversity. Experimental results under our evaluation setting show that top-performing LLMs surpass anime fans in role-playing and emotional support, while humans still lead in diversity.

Abstract:
While NLP typically treats documents as independent and unordered samples, in longitudinal studies, this assumption rarely holds: documents are nested within authors and ordered in time, forming person-indexed, time-ordered behavioral sequences .Here, we demonstrate the need for and propose a longitudinal modeling and evaluation paradigm that consequently updates four parts of the NLP pipeline: (1) evaluation splits aligned to generalization over people ( cross-sectional ) and/or time ( prospective ); (2) accuracy metrics separating between-person differences from within-person dynamics; (3) sequence inputs to incorporate history by default; and (4) model internals that support different coarseness of latent state over histories (pooled summaries, explicit dynamics, or interaction-based models).We demonstrate the issues ensued by traditional pipeline and our proposed improvements on a dataset of 17k daily diary transcripts paired with PTSD symptom severity from 238 participants, finding that traditional document-level evaluation can yield substantially different and sometimes reversed conclusions compared to our ecologically valid modeling and evaluation. We tie our results to a broader discussion motivating a shift from word-sequence evaluation toward behavior-sequence paradigms for NLP.

Abstract:
The hubness problem, in which hub embeddings are close to many unrelated examples, occurs often in high-dimensional embedding spaces and may pose a practical threat for purposes such as information retrieval and automatic evaluation metrics.In particular, since cross-modal similarity between text and images cannot be calculated by direct comparisons, such as string matching, cross-modal encoders that project different modalities into a shared space are helpful for various cross-modal applications, and thus, the existence of hubs may pose practical threats.To reveal the vulnerabilities of cross-modal encoders, we propose a method for identifying the hub embedding and its corresponding hub text.Experiments on image captioning evaluation in MSCOCO and nocaps along with image-to-text retrieval tasks in MSCOCO and Flickr30k showed that our method can identify a single hub text that unreasonably achieves comparable or higher similarity scores than human-written reference captions in many images, thereby revealing the vulnerabilities in cross-modal encoders.

Abstract:
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) is shifting the focus from single, verifiable tasks toward complex, open-ended real-world scenarios, imposing significant challenges on the post-training phase. In these settings, the scale and complexity of reward systems have grown significantly, transitioning toward multi-objective formulations that encompass a comprehensive spectrum of model capabilities and application contexts. However, traditional methods typically rely on fixed reward weights, ignoring non-stationary learning dynamics and struggling with data heterogeneity across dimensions. To address these issues, we propose SPARD, a framework that establishes an automated, self-paced curriculum by perceiving learning progress to dynamically adjust multi-objective reward weights and data importance, thereby synchronizing learning intent with data utility for optimal performance. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that SPARD significantly enhances model capabilities across all domains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/SPARD.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) for code rely on subword tokenizers, such as byte-pair encoding (BPE), learned from mixed natural language text and programming language code but driven by statistics rather than grammar. As a result, semantically identical code snippets can be tokenized differently depending on superficial factors such as whitespace or identifier naming. To measure the impact of this misalignment, we introduce TokDrift, a framework that applies semantic-preserving rewrite rules to create code variants differing only in tokenization. Across nine code LLMs, including large ones with over 30B parameters, even minor formatting changes can cause substantial shifts in model behavior. Layer-wise analysis shows that the issue originates in early embeddings, where subword segmentation fails to capture grammar token boundaries. Our findings identify misaligned tokenization as a hidden obstacle to reliable code understanding and generation, highlighting the need for grammar-aware tokenization for future code LLMs.

Abstract:
Despite significant advances in LLM-driven GUI agents, the field remains constrained by the challenge of reconciling high-fidelity realism with verifiable evaluation accuracy. To address this, we introduce NaturalGAIA, a verifiable evaluation dataset grounded in real-world human GUI interaction intents. By decoupling logical causal pathways from linguistic narratives, it rigorously simulates natural human intent, characterized by cognitive non-linearity and contextual dependencies. Furthermore, we propose LightManus-Jarvis, a hierarchical collaborative framework where LightManus manages dynamic topological planning and context evolution, while Jarvis ensures execution precision via hybrid visual-structural perception. Experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves a Weighted Pathway Success Rate of 45.6%, significantly outperforming the state-of-the-art baseline (21.1%), while reducing token consumption by 75% and execution time by 76%. These results validate the efficacy of the macro-planning and micro-execution paradigm in handling complex naturalized tasks. Our code is publicly available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/NatureGAIA-721F/.

Abstract:
The increasing reliance on cloud-hosted Large Language Models (LLMs) exposes sensitive client data, such as prompts and responses, to potential privacy breaches by service providers.Existing approaches fail to ensure privacy, maintain model performance, and preserve computational efficiency simultaneously.To address this challenge, we propose Talaria, a confidential inference framework that partitions the LLM pipeline between a client-verified Confidential Virtual Machine (CVM) and the public cloud to protect client data without compromising the cloud’s model intellectual property or inference quality.The interaction between the CVM and the cloud is secured by our Reversible Masked Outsourcing (ReMO) protocol, which uses a hybrid masking technique to reversibly obscure intermediate data before outsourcing computations.Extensive evaluations show that Talaria can defend against state-of-the-art token inference attacks, reducing token reconstruction accuracy from over 97.5% to an average of 1.34%, all while being a lossless mechanism that guarantees output identical to the original model without significantly decreasing efficiency and scalability.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that ensures clients’ prompts and responses remain inaccessible to the cloud, while also preserving model privacy, performance, and efficiency.

Abstract:
Vision–Language Models (VLMs) excel at visual reasoning but still struggle with external knowledge integration. Retrieval-Augmented Generation(RAG) is a promising solution, but current methods remain inefficient and often fail to maintain high answer quality. To address these challenges, we propose VideoSpeculateRAG, an efficient VLM-based RAG framework built on two key ideas. First, we introduce a speculative decoding pipeline: a lightweight draft model quickly generates multiple answer candidates, which are then verified and refined by a more accurate heavyweight model, substantially reducing inference latency without sacrificing correctness. Second, we identify a major source of error, incorrect entity recognition in retrieved knowledge, and mitigate it with a simple yet effective similarity-based filtering strategy that improves entity alignment and boosts overall answer accuracy. Experiments demonstrate that VideoSpeculateRAG achieves comparable or higher accuracy than standard RAG approaches, while speeding up the inference by approximately 2x. Our framework highlights the potential of combining speculative decoding with retrieval-augmented reasoning to enhance efficiency and reliability in complex, knowledge-intensive multimodal tasks.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have scaled the potential for reasoning and agentic search, wherein models autonomously plan, retrieve, and reason over external knowledge to answer complex queries. However, the iterative think–search loop accumulates long system memories, leading to memory dilution problem. In addition, existing memory management methods struggle to capture fine-grained semantic relations between queries and documents and often lose substantial information. Therefore, we propose MemSearch-o1, an agentic search framework built on reasoning-aligned memory growth and retracing. MemSearch-o1 dynamically grows fine-grained memory fragments from memory seed tokens from the queries, then retraces and deeply refines the memory via a contribution function, and finally reorganizes a globally connected memory path. This shifts memory management from stream-like concatenation to structured, token-level growth with path-based reasoning. Experiments on eight benchmark datasets show that MemSearch-o1 substantially mitigates memory dilution, and more effectively activates the reasoning potential of diverse LLMs, establishing a solid foundation for memory-aware agentic intelligence.

Abstract:
Despite strong results on many tasks, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) still underperform on visual mathematical problem solving, especially in reliably perceiving and interpreting diagrams. Inspired by human problem-solving, we hypothesize that the ability to extract meaningful information from diagrams is pivotal, as it directly conditions subsequent inference.Hence, we introduce FlowVerse, a comprehensive benchmark that provides a fine-grained evaluation of MLLMs’ perception and reasoning capabilities. Our preliminary results on FlowVerse reveal that existing MLLMs exhibit substantial limitations when extracting essential information and reasoned properties from diagrams and performing complex reasoning based on these visual inputs. In response, we introduce MathFlow, a modular problem-solving pipeline that decouples perception and inference into distinct stages, thereby optimizing each independently. Given the perceptual limitations observed in current MLLMs, we trained MathFlow-P-7B as a dedicated perception model.Experimental results indicate that MathFlow-P-7B yields substantial performance gains when integrated with various closed-source and open-source inference models. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the MathFlow pipeline and its compatibility with diverse inference frameworks. Project page: https://github.com/MathFlow-zju/MathFlow.

Abstract:
Video anomaly understanding (VAU) is critical for real-world scenarios. Recent advances in Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) enhance the ability of VAU models to describe and interpret anomalies. However, progress in anomaly localization is still limited by two key issues. First, most existing video anomaly datasets only annotate segments that are clearly inconsistent with the context, often omitting subsequent segments that are semantically part of the same abnormal event. Second, the field lacks systematic evaluation protocols. To bridge these gaps, we introduce VALU, a new benchmark that explicitly defines anomalies across five semantic levels and provides comprehensive temporal boundaries and detailed textual descriptions for each. Based on these annotations, we design three evaluation tasks that comprehensively assess models’ capabilities across different dimensions, including temporal grounding, anomaly localization, and anomaly detail discrimination. Evaluation results reveal persistent challenges in current models’ capabilities on VAU. We further analyze and discuss these findings, and hope that both VALU and insights will advance research in VAU and the development of Video-LLMs. Our benchmark will be publicly available.

Abstract:
Recent efforts on text-to-audio (TTA) generation are starting to explore fine-grained controllability, e.g., precise timing control, with innovations on conditioning techniques or training-free latent manipulations. However, constrained by data scarcity, their generation performance at scale is still limited. In this study, we recast high-controllability TTA generation as a multi-task learning problem, and introduce a progressive diffusion modeling approach, ControlAudio. Our method adeptly fits distributions conditioned on fine-grained information, including text, timing, and phoneme features, through a step-by-step strategy. First, we propose a data construction method spanning both annotation and simulation, augmenting condition information in the sequence of text, timing, and phoneme. Second, at the model training stage, we pretrain a scalable diffusion transformer (DiT) on large-scale text-audio pairs, achieving high-fidelity TTA generation, and then incrementally integrate the timing and phoneme features, expanding controllability. Finally, at the inference stage, we propose progressively guided generation, which sequentially emphasizes more fine-grained information, aligning inherently with the coarse-to-fine sampling nature of DiT. Extensive experiments show that ControlAudio achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of temporal accuracy and speech clarity, significantly outperforming existing methods on both objective and subjective evaluations. Demo samples are available at: https://control-audio.github.io/Control-Audio.

Abstract:
To keep pace with the increasing velocity of large language models (LLM) development, model output evaluation has transitioned away from time-consuming human evaluation to automatic evaluation, where LLMs themselves are tasked with assessing and critiquing other model outputs. LLM-as-judge models are a class of generative evaluators that excel in evaluating relatively simple domains, like chat quality, but struggle in reasoning intensive domains where model responses contain more substantive and challenging content. To remedy existing judge shortcomings, we explore training judges with reinforcement learning (RL). We make three key contributions: (1) We propose the Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimization (EIS-GRPO) algorithm, which allows us to train our judge to be robust to positional biases that arise in more complex evaluation settings. (2) We introduce ReasoningJudgeBench, a benchmark that evaluates judges in diverse reasoning settings not covered by prior work. (3) We train Judge for Reasoning (J4R), a 7B judge trained with EIS-GRPO that outperforms GPT-4o and the next best small judge by 6.7% and 9%, matching or exceeding the performance of larger GRPO-trained judges on both JudgeBench and ReasoningJudgeBench.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to indirect prompt injection attack, where the model inadvertently responds to instructions injected into the prompt context. This vulnerability stems from LLMs’ inability to distinguish between data and instructions within a prompt. We propose CachePrune that defends against this attack by identifying and pruning neurons associated with instruction-following, during KV cache encoding of the prompt context. The pruning steers the LLM toward interpreting the context purely as data rather than as instructions to follow. To identify these neurons, we introduce a neural attribution mechanism guided by a preferential attribution loss, and theoretically connect this loss to an upper bound of the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) objective. Further, we improve on the fidelity of neural attribution by leveraging an observed triggering effect in instruction-following. Our approach does not interfere with prompt formatting or incur test-time overhead in response generation. Experiments show that CachePrune significantly reduces the attack success rate while preserving the LLM’s ability to follow user instructions.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at complex reasoning through search algorithms, yet current strategies often suffer from massive token consumption due to redundant exploration of semantically equivalent steps. Existing semantic similarity methods struggle to accurately identify such equivalence in domain-specific contexts like mathematical reasoning. To address this, we propose EquivPruner , a simple yet effective approach that identifies and prunes semantically equivalent actions during LLM reasoning search. We also introduce MathEquiv, the first dataset we created for mathematical statement equivalence, which enables the training of a lightweight equivalence detector. Extensive experiments across various models and tasks demonstrate that EquivPruner significantly reduces token consumption, improving searching efficiency and often bolstering reasoning accuracy. For instance, when applied to Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct on GSM8K, EquivPruner reduced token consumption by 48.1% while also improving accuracy. Our code is available at https://github.com/Lolo1222/EquivPruner .

Abstract:
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), have significantly reduced the number of trainable parameters needed in fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). The developments of LoRA-style adapters have considered two main directions: (1) enhancing model expressivity with high-rank adapters, and (2) aiming for further parameter reduction, as exemplified by vector-based methods. However, these approaches come with a trade-off, as achieving the expressivity of high-rank weight updates typically comes at the cost of sacrificing the extreme parameter efficiency offered by vector-based techniques. To address this issue, we propose a vector-based random Tensor network for high-Rank Adaptation (TeRA), a novel PEFT method that achieves high-rank weight updates while retaining the parameter efficiency of vector-based PEFT adapters. This is achieved by parametrizing the tensorized weight update matrix as a Tucker-like tensor network (TN), whereby large randomly initialized factors are frozen and shared across layers, while only small layer-specific scaling vectors, corresponding to diagonal entries of factor matrices, are trained. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that TeRA matches or even outperforms existing high-rank adapters, while requiring as few trainable parameters as vector-based methods. Theoretical analysis and ablation studies validate the effectiveness of the proposed TeRA method. The code is available at https://github.com/guyuxuan9/TeRA.

Abstract:
The evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation relies heavily on the quality and robustness of test cases. However, existing benchmarks often lack coverage for subtle corner cases, allowing incorrect solutions to pass. To bridge this gap, we propose CodeHacker, an automated agent framework dedicated to generating targeted adversarial test cases that expose latent vulnerabilities in program submissions. Mimicking the hack mechanism in competitive programming, CodeHacker employs a multi-strategy approach—including stress testing, anti-hash attacks, and logic-specific targeting to break specific code submissions. To ensure the validity and reliability of these attacks, we introduce a Calibration Phase, where the agent iteratively refines its own Validator and Checker via self-generated adversarial probes before evaluating contestant code. Experiments demonstrate that CodeHacker significantly improves the True Negative Rate (TNR) of existing datasets, effectively filtering out incorrect solutions that were previously accepted. Furthermore, generated adversarial cases prove to be superior training data, boosting the performance of RL-trained models on benchmarks like LiveCodeBench. All code, datasets, and evaluation scripts will be open-sourced to promote further investigation in LLMs for competitive programming.

Abstract:
Harmful content detectors—particularly disinformation classifiers—are predominantly developed and evaluated on Standard American English (), leaving their robustness to dialectal variation unexplored. We present , the first benchmark for evaluating disinformation detection robustness across 50 English dialects spanning U.S., British, African, Caribbean, and Asia-Pacific varieties. Using Multi-VALUE’s linguistically-grounded transformations, we introduce D-CUBE (Dialectal Disinformation Detection Corpus), a core corpus component of comprising 195K samples derived from established disinformation benchmarks. Our evaluation of 16 detection models reveals systematic vulnerabilities: human-written dialectal content degrades detection by 1.4–3.6% F1, while AI-generated content remains stable. Fine-tuned transformers substantially outperform zero-shot LLMs (96.6% vs. 78.3% best-case F1), with some models exhibiting catastrophic failures exceeding 33% degradation on mixed content. Cross-dialectal transfer analysis across 2,450 dialect pairs shows that multilingual models (mDeBERTa: 97.2% average F1) generalize effectively, while monolingual models like RoBERTa and XLM-RoBERTa fail on dialectal inputs. These findings demonstrate that current disinformation detectors may systematically disadvantage hundreds of millions of non- speakers worldwide. We release the benchmark, including the , and evaluation tools.

Abstract:
Recent advances in zero-shot text-to-speech (TTS) have enabled accurate imitation of reference speech in terms of both speaking style and speaker timbre. However, achieving disentangled control over these aspects from separate references remains a challenging task. Several studies have proposed disentangled speech representations that decompose speech into interpretable attributes ( e.g. , timbre, prosody, and content), providing a promising foundation for TTS with attribute control from separate references. Yet, how to effectively integrate such representations into TTS systems to achieve independent and precise control remains underexplored. In this paper, we present FC-TTS, a zero-shot TTS framework that enables disentangled control of style and timbre by conditioning on two distinct reference utterances. Unlike existing systems that inherit limitations from those pre-trained disentangled representations, FC-TTS introduces key design strategies, including architectural choices, training framework, and auxiliary training objectives, which improve the reliability of attribute separation and dual-reference control. Experiments show that FC-TTS achieves high-fidelity synthesis and competitive zero-shot naturalness, while uniquely supporting consistent and independent manipulation of style and timbre. Audio samples are available at https://qualcomm-ai-research.github.io/fc-tts

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful at question-answering but prone to hallucinations due to limited domain-specific or up-to-date knowledge. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) mitigates this by adding an external retriever and knowledge database, yet RAG remains vulnerable to targeted attacks that degrade outputs or manipulate opinions. Prior attacks typically assume adversaries know the service is RAG-enhanced and may even know deployment details, an assumption often invalid for real-world commercial LLMs that expose only black-box APIs.This opacity also risks misleading users about system capabilities. This work aims to bridge this gap by proposing RAG-ID , a framework for ̲ ID entifying ̲ RAG properties in LLM services.We classify adversaries into three knowledge levels and design six attack methods. Experiments show these attacks reliably detect RAG — up to 99.97% accuracy with partial or no optional knowledge, and nearly 100% when the LLM and database are known. After detection, RAG-ID can infer finer RAG properties (e.g., deployed LLM and knowledge database). We consider RAG-ID a reconnaissance tool for attackers, a way to facilitate users’ transparent selection of LLM services, and a guide for RAG developers in refining security measures.

Abstract:
Medical calculators are fundamental to quantitative, evidence-based clinical practice. However, their real-world use is an adaptive, multi-stage process, requiring proactive EHR data acquisition, scenario-dependent calculator selection, and multi-step computation, whereas current benchmarks focus only on static single-step calculations with explicit instructions. To address these limitations, we introduce MedMCP-Calc, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in realistic medical calculator scenarios through Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. MedMCP-Calc comprises 118 scenario tasks across 4 clinical domains, featuring fuzzy task descriptions mimicking natural queries, structured EHR database interaction, external reference retrieval, and process-level evaluation. Our evaluation of 23 leading models reveals critical limitations: even top performers like GPT-5 exhibit substantial gaps, including difficulty selecting appropriate calculators for end-to-end workflows given fuzzy queries, poor performance in iterative SQL-based database interactions, and marked reluctance to leverage external tools for numerical computation. Performance also varies considerably across clinical domains. Building on these findings, we develop CalcMate, a fine-tuned model incorporating scenario planning and tool augmentation, achieving state-of-the-art performance among open-source models.

Abstract:
Conversation derailment prediction represents a new paradigm of toxicity detection, where a system predicts from the start of a conversation whether it will derail into toxic exchanges, allowing moderators and users to act preemptively before harm is done. This approach requires a deep understanding of conversation dynamics. Previous work relies on linguistic features rooted in linguistic and social theories. While these features provide signals of conversation dynamics, they are exploratory in nature and potentially reflect a fraction of the overall pragmatic devices shaping the conversation trajectory. To capture the pragmatic dimension of conversations systematically, we start with a framework for annotating pragmatic information of conversations systematically and design summary generation methods to capture conversation trajectory dynamically. We achieve about 10% performance increase over a simple baseline, and 6.47% increase over a strong baseline on a dataset, and a slight performance increase on a benchmark dataset for the task of summarizing conversation dynamics.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse tasks through large-scale pretraining. However, they remain prone to catastrophic forgetting in continual learning. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to identify noise accumulation in LoRA updates as a key cause of forgetting in continual learning. A preliminary two-task experiment demonstrates that removing less important components of the second task’s LoRA parameters improves performance on the first task, suggesting that later updates introduce noisy interference. Building on this insight, we propose Subspace-Denoised Low-Rank Adaptation (SLoRA), a simple and effective framework that filters noisy components from LoRA updates via subspace similarity with the base model. SLoRA is a regularization-free method without accessing data or gradients from previous tasks or modifying the training process. It offers two variants, SLoRA-Pre and SLoRA-Post, for online and offline continual learning, respectively. Extensive experiments across tasks and models validate the effectiveness of SLoRA. It improves final accuracy by up to 12%, reduces forgetting by 29%, and filters out over 30% of LoRA parameters identified as noisy. Our code is available at https://github.com/alina1031/SLoRA.

Abstract:
For people affected by blindness and low vision (BLV), safe and independent navigation remains a major challenge, impacting over 2.2 billion individuals worldwide. Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) offer new opportunities for assistive navigation, progress has been limited by the scarcity of accessibility-aware datasets, requiring labor-intensive, expert annotation. To this end, we introduce GuideDog, a novel dataset containing 22K image-description pairs (2K human-verified) capturing real-world pedestrian scenes across 46 countries. Our human-AI pipeline shifts annotation from generation to verification, grounded in established BLV guidance standards from experts and research, improving scalability while maintaining quality. We also present GuideDogQA, an 818-sample benchmark evaluating object recognition and depth perception. Experiments reveal that depth perception and adherence to these standards remain challenging for current MLLMs. Code and dataset will be publicly available.

Abstract:
Due to the limited generalization and interpretability of deep learning classifiers, the final vetting of rare celestial object candidates still relies on manually intensive expert visual inspection, which has become a primary bottleneck as modern spectroscopic surveys continue to scale.To bridge this gap, we propose Spec-o3, a tool-augmented vision-language agent that performs astronomer-aligned spectral inspection via interleaved multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning.Spec-o3 is trained with a two-stage post-training recipe: cold-start supervised fine-tuning on expert inspection trajectories followed by outcome-based reinforcement learning on rare-type verification tasks.Evaluated on five rare-object identification tasks from LAMOST, Spec-o3 establishes a new State-of-the-Art, boosting the macro-F1 score from 28.3 to 76.5 with a 7B parameter base model and outperforming both proprietary VLMs and specialized deep models. Beyond accuracy, Spec-o3 processes spectra at ∼ 0.2 s per sample on an 8 × H100 server, a ∼ 50 × throughput gain over expert manual inspection. The agent also demonstrates strong generalization to unseen inspection tasks across survey shifts (from LAMOST to SDSS/DESI). Expert evaluations further confirm that its reasoning traces are coherent and physically consistent, supporting transparent and trustworthy decision-making.Code, data, and models are available at Project HomePage.

Abstract:
While AndroidWorld has become the dominant mobile-use benchmark due to its reproducible environment and deterministic evaluation, recent agents achieving over 90% success rates indicate saturation and motivate the need for greater challenge. In addition, its environment lacks key application categories, such as e-commerce and enterprise communication, and does not reflect realistic mobile-use scenarios characterized by vague user instructions and hybrid tool usage. We introduce MobileWorld, a substantially more challenging benchmark with 201 tasks across 20 applications that reflects real-world usage through long-horizon, cross-application workflows requiring nearly twice as many steps (27.8 vs. 14.3) and featuring significantly more multi-app tasks (62.2% vs. 9.5%) than AndroidWorld. MobileWorld balances production-grade utility and reproducible evaluation using open-source alternatives to industry standards (e.g., Mattermost for Slack), enabling full observability through source code modification and direct database access. Beyond standard GUI manipulation, MobileWorld introduces novel task categories including agent-user interaction and Model Context Protocol (MCP)-augmented tasks for evaluating agents in user-aware, hybrid-tool scenarios. We develop a planner-executor framework with extended action spaces supporting user interactions and MCP calls. Results show a sharp performance drop from AndroidWorld, with the best agentic framework and end-to-end model achieving 51.7% and 20.9% success rates, respectively, highlighting substantial room for future research.

Abstract:
While mechanistic interpretability tools like Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can uncover meaningful features within Large Language Models (LLMs), a critical gap remains in transforming these insights into practical actions for model optimization. We bridge this gap with the hypothesis that data selection guided by a model’s internal task features is a effective training strategy. Inspired by this, we propose Interpretability-Guided Data Selection (IGDS), a framework that first identifies these causal task features through frequency recall and interventional filtering, then selects “Feature-Resonant Data” that maximally activates task features for fine-tuning. We validate IGDS on mathematical reasoning, summarization, and translation tasks within Gemma-2, LLaMA-3.1, and Qwen3 models. Our experiments demonstrate exceptional data efficiency: on the Math task, IGDS surpasses full-dataset fine-tuning by a remarkable 17.4% on Gemma-2-2B while using only 50% of the data, and outperforms established baselines focused on data quality and diversity. Analysis confirms a strong positive correlation between feature amplification and task performance improvement. IGDS thus provides a direct and effective framework to enhance LLMs by leveraging their internal mechanisms, validating our core hypothesis.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding accelerates large language model (LLM) inference through a draft-and-verify paradigm, yet existing methods face three key limitations: reliance on fixed draft templates that ignore device-specific verification costs, lack of mechanisms to assess draft token quality, and suboptimal tree expansion strategies. We introduce UniSpec, a training-free, lossless speculative decoding framework that enables robust, plug-and-play LLM acceleration across diverse hardware configurations and languages. UniSpec incorporates three novel components: (1) a device-aware calibration mechanism that determines the optimal draft size by measuring the acceptance-time trade-off on each target device; (2) a confidence score estimation module that assigns quality scores to n-grams based on the verifier’s token probabilities, enabling selective retention of high-quality draft candidates; and (3) an improved tree expansion strategy that broadens first-level exploration and applies threshold-based filtering to prune low-confidence nodes. To comprehensively evaluate multilingual performance, we create a comprehensive benchmark, covering seven languages across seven generation tasks. Experiments with various LLM architectures, hardware environments, and languages demonstrate that UniSpec consistently outperforms existing training-free methods, achieving speedups of up to 2.6x while maintaining output quality identical to standard autoregressive decoding. Our code and benchmark are publicly available.

Abstract:
Key Information Extraction (KIE) from real-world documents remains challenging due to substantial variations in layout structures, visual quality, and task-specific information requirements. Recent Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown promising potential for performing end-to-end KIE directly from document images. To enable a comprehensive and systematic evaluation across realistic and diverse application scenarios, we introduce UNIKIE-BENCH, a unified benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the KIE capabilities of LMMs. UNIKIE-BENCH consists of two complementary tracks: a constrained-category KIE track with scenario-predefined schemas that reflect practical application needs, and an open-category KIE track that extracts any key information that is explicitly present in the document. Experiments on 15 state-of-the-art LMMs reveal substantial performance degradation under diverse schema definitions, long-tail key fields, and complex layouts, along with pronounced performance disparities across different document types and scenarios. These findings underscore persistent challenges in grounding accuracy and layout-aware reasoning for LMM-based KIE. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/UNIKIE-BENCH.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in specialized domains such as finance and healthcare, where they introduce unique safety risks. Domain-specific datasets of harmful prompts remain scarce and still largely rely on manual construction; public datasets mainly focus on explicit harmful prompts, which modern LLM defenses can often detect and refuse. In contrast, implicit harmful prompts—expressed through indirect domain knowledge—are harder to detect and better reflect real-world threats. We identify two challenges: transforming domain knowledge into actionable constraints and increasing the implicitness of generated harmful prompts. To address them, we propose an end-to-end framework that first performs knowledge-graph-guided harmful prompt generation to systematically produce domain-relevant prompts, and then applies two-strategy obfuscation rewriting to convert explicit harmful prompts into implicit variants via direct and context-enhanced rewriting. This framework yields high-quality datasets combining strong domain relevance with implicitness, enabling more realistic red-teaming and advancing LLM safety research. We release our code and datasets on GitHub.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance and have revolutionized NLP, but their lack of explainability keeps them treated as black boxes, limiting their use in domains that demand transparency and trust. A promising direction to address this issue is post-hoc text-based explanations, which aim to explain model decisions in natural language. Prior work has focused on generating convincing rationales that appear to be subjectively faithful, but it remains unclear whether these explanations are epistemically faithful - that is, whether they reflect the internal evidence the model actually relied on for its decision. In this paper, we first assess the epistemic faithfulness of LLM-generated explanations via counterfactuals and show that they are often unfaithful. We then introduce a training-free method, that enhances faithfulness by guiding explanation generation through attention-level interventions, informed by token-level heatmaps extracted via a faithful attribution method. This method significantly improves epistemic faithfulness across multiple models, benchmarks, and prompts. Our code is attached as supplementary material.

Abstract:
Rerankers are critical in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for filtering evidence that enhances the accurate generation of LLMs. With the extension to open-domain scenarios, rerankers are inevitably deployed on mixed-style corpora, whereas most existing rerankers are mainly trained on well-edited texts. A rarely explored issue lies in enabling rerankers to maximally capture the effective knowledge for downstream LLMs without being misled by stylistic features. To address this issue, we propose SARK (Style-Adaptive Reranker with Knowledge Prioritization), a style-augmented multi-task framework that prioritizes effective knowledge over stylistic perturbations. SARK performs multi-granular knowledge mining by using an LLM to derive passage-level supervision on whether a passage helps or harms answer correctness, and list-level relative ranking preferences over candidate passages. It then jointly optimizes the reranker model with passage-level classification and list-level ranking objectives via style-augmented multi-task learning, encouraging the model to focus on the information needed for answering under mixed-style scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SARK improves generation performance across multiple LLMs under mixed-style conditions.

Abstract:
Multi-agent LLM systems routinely generate multiple candidate responses that are aggregated by an LLM judge. To reduce the dominant prefill cost in such pipelines, recent work advocates KV cache reuse across partially shared contexts and reports substantial speedups for generation agents. In this work, we show that these efficiency gains do not transfer uniformly to judge-centric inference. Across GSM8K, MMLU, and HumanEval, we find that reuse strategies that are effective for execution agents can severely perturb judge behavior: end-task accuracy may appear stable, yet the judge’s selection becomes highly inconsistent with dense prefill. We quantify this risk using Judge Consistency Rate (JCR) and provide diagnostics showing that reuse systematically weakens cross-candidate attention, especially for later candidate blocks. Our ablation further demonstrates that explicit cross-candidate interaction is crucial for preserving dense-prefill decisions. Overall, our results identify a previously overlooked failure mode of KV cache reuse and highlight judge-centric inference as a distinct regime that demands dedicated, risk-aware system design.

Abstract:
Argument summarization aims to generate concise, structured representations of complex, multi-perspective debates. While recent work has advanced the identification and clustering of argumentative components, the generation stage remains underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on single-pass generation, offering limited support for factual correction or structural refinement. To address this gap, we introduce Arg-LLaDA, a novel large language diffusion framework that iteratively improves summaries via sufficiency-guided remasking and regeneration. Our method combines a flexible masking controller with a sufficiency-checking module to identify and revise unsupported, redundant, or incomplete spans—yielding more faithful, concise, and coherent outputs. Empirical results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that Arg-LLaDA surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in 7 out of 10 automatic evaluation metrics. In addition, human evaluations reveal substantial improvements across core dimensions, coverage, faithfulness, and conciseness,validating the effectiveness of our iterative, sufficiency-aware generation strategy.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has significantly boosted the reasoning capability of language models (LMs). However, existing RLVR approaches train LMs based on their own on-policy responses and are constrained by the initial capability of LMs, thus prone to exploration stagnation, in which LMs fail to solve more training problems and cannot further learn from the training data. Some approaches try to address this by leveraging off-policy solutions to training problems, but rely on external expert guidance that is limited in availability and scalability. In this work, we propose LTE (Learning to reason from Trial and Error), an approach that hints LMs with their previously self-made mistakes, not requiring any external expert guidance. Experiments validate the effectiveness of LTE, which outperforms the normal group relative policy optimization (GRPO) by 5.02 in Pass@1 and 9.96 in Pass@k on average across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3-8B-Base and even performs better than methods that require external guidance. Further analysis confirms that LTE successfully mitigates exploration stagnation and enhances both exploitation and exploration during training. Our code is available at https://github.com/JamyDon/LTE.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face significant memory and latency overheads during long-context inference due to the growing KV cache, especially in Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) settings that require support for multiple downstream queries. Query-aware eviction methods do not generalize across queries, while existing query-agnostic approaches rely on a single proxy query, leading to fragile eviction decisions under high eviction ratios. We propose ContrastKV, a robust query-agnostic KV cache eviction algorithm for multi-query generalization. ContrastKV introduces a contrastive signal fusion mechanism that jointly exploits complementary semantic and non-semantic signals. By contrasting semantic consistency with structural robustness, the method constructs a more reliable eviction criterion that alleviates the blind spots of single-query proxies. The framework integrates efficient signal generation, parallel importance scoring, and multi-level fusion across heads and layers. Experiments show that ContrastKV outperforms state-of-the-art methods, retaining up to 92% accuracy with only 20% of the KV cache budget, while reducing decoding latency by approximately 50% and significantly lowering GPU memory usage.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) dialogue agents are increasingly used in psychological therapy, yet robustness across diverse patients remains underexplored. We address this gap with three contributions: (1) MindEval, a realistic role-play protocol for evaluating therapeutic dialogue agents; (2) MindData, a de-identified, expert-annotated corpus of therapist–patient dialogues (2,573 sessions; 63,348 turns); and (3) MindApt, a framework that integrates a therapeutic dialogue state tracking paradigm with a patient-aware strategic planning module. On MindEval, MindApt outperforms strong baselines on therapeutic outcomes and dialogue quality while improving conversational efficiency. To evaluate utility beyond role-play, we conducted a clinical study with real patients, demonstrating that MindApt-guided care achieves outcomes comparable to therapist-determined care, while the hybrid setting combining therapist judgment with MindApt’s recommendations yields the strongest overall outcomes.

Abstract:
When asked explicitly, a Large language model (LLM) may validate your anger—but implicitly, it may still judge that anger as inappropriate. We call this divergence the endorsement–exposure gap, and it reveals that LLMs encode hidden norms about which emotions are acceptable in which contexts. To measure these norms systematically, we introduce Feeling Rules Atlas, a benchmark of 1,320 vignettes spanning 6 institutional settings, 12 roles, 7 emotions, and 5 intensity levels. We pair the benchmark with two probes: explicit norm judgments (APPROPRIATE/INAPPROPRIATE/DEPENDS) and implicit acceptability scored by log-likelihood contrast. Across six model families, we find large cross-model variation in sanctioning thresholds and institutional "norm signatures" not reducible to overall strictness; models that appear similarly lenient explicitly can diverge sharply in implicit judgments. These results establish normative affect—context-conditioned judgments of emotional appropriateness—as a distinct alignment axis, and motivate transparent profiling of feeling rules for emotionally sensitive deployments.

Abstract:
Over the past year, spatial intelligence has drawn increasing attention. Many prior works study it from the perspective of visual-spatial intelligence, where models have access to visuospatial information from visual inputs. However, in the absence of visual information, whether linguistic intelligence alone is sufficient to endow models with spatial intelligence, and how models perform relevant tasks with text-only inputs still remain unexplored. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on a fundamental and critical capability in spatial intelligence from a linguistic perspective: viewpoint rotation understanding (VRU). Specifically, LLMs and VLMs are asked to infer their final viewpoint and predict the corresponding observation in an environment given textual description of viewpoint rotation and observation over multiple steps. We find that both LLMs and VLMs perform poorly on our proposed dataset while human can easily achieve 100% accuracy, indicating a substantial gap between current model capabilities and the requirements of spatial intelligence. To uncover the underlying mechanisms, we conduct a layer-wise probing analysis and head-wise causal intervention. Our findings reveal that although models encode viewpoint information in the hidden states, they appear to struggle to bind the viewpoint position with corresponding observation, resulting in a hallucination in final layers. Finally, we selectively fine-tune the key attention heads identified by causal intervention to improve VRU performance. Experimental results demonstrate that such selective fine-tuning achieves improved VRU performance while avoiding catastrophic forgetting of generic abilities.

Abstract:
In medicine, claims remain valid when supported by empirical evidence grounded in stable biological reality. In law, by contrast, truth is contingent, defined by jurisdiction, temporal validity, and the hierarchy of authoritative sources. The recent success of large language models (LLMs) on medical licensing examinations has encouraged an expectation of comparable legal competence. This analogy, however, obscures a critical distinction between domains. Unlike in medicine, legal performance often depends less on inference than on determining when external authority is applicable, valid, and non-contradictory. We introduce a comparative diagnostic framework evaluating legal reasoning against medical baselines along four axes (knowledge recall, grounding, confidence, and robustness), uncovering a sharp domain asymmetry when applied to a new benchmark that encodes temporal validity and normative relationships. While medical LLMs reliably benefit from verified sources, legal LLMs struggle to assess when retrieved citations are useful or misleading, exhibiting overconfidence in perturbed contexts and sensitivity to superficial formatting cues. Increased model scale amplifies this tendency, revealing that stronger instruction following can coincide with weaker resistance to authoritative perturbations. These findings show that LLMs treat law as unstructured text rather than binding precedent, while revealing a tendency to over-trust authoritative but false information when external references conflict with a model’s internal knowledge.

Abstract:
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enhanced tabular question answering (Tabular QA), yet they struggle with open-domain queries exhibiting underspecified or uncertain expressions. To address this, we introduce the ODUTQA-MDC task and the first comprehensive benchmark to tackle it. This benchmark includes: (1) a large-scale ODUTQA dataset with 209 tables and 25,105 QA pairs; (2) a fine-grained labeling scheme for detailed evaluation; and (3) a dynamic clarification interface that simulates user feedback for interactive assessment. We also propose MAIC-TQA, a multi-agent framework that excels at detecting ambiguities, clarifying them through dialogue, and refining answers. Experiments validate our benchmark and framework, establishing them as a key resource for advancing conversational, underspecification-aware Tabular QA research.

Abstract:
Efficient CUDA implementations of attention mechanisms are critical to modern deep learning systems, yet supporting diverse and evolving attention variants remains challenging. Existing frameworks and compilers trade performance for flexibility, while expert-written kernels achieve high efficiency but are difficult to adapt. Recent work explores large language models (LLMs) for GPU kernel generation, but prior studies report unstable correctness and significant performance gaps for complex operators such as attention.We present CuBridge, an LLM-based framework that adapts expert-written attention kernels through a structured lift–transfer–lower workflow. CuBridge starts from expert-written CUDA attention kernels and lifts them into an executable intermediate representation that makes execution orchestration explicit while abstracting low-level CUDA syntax. Given a user-provided PyTorch specification, CuBridge generates and verifies a target IR program, then reconstructs optimized CUDA code via reference-guided lowering. Across diverse attention variants and GPU platforms, CuBridge consistently produces correct kernels and substantially outperforms general frameworks, compiler-based approaches, and prior LLM-based methods.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) generate text through iterative denoising. In commonly adopted parallel decoding schemes, each step confirms only high-confidence positions while remasking the others. By analyzing dLLM denoising traces, we uncover a key inefficiency: models often predict the correct target token several steps before its confidence becomes high enough to be decoded. This gap between early prediction and late decoding forces repeated remasking of already-correct tokens, causing redundant iterations and limiting acceleration. To exploit this temporal redundancy, we introduce Trace Credit to quantify a token’s decoding potential by accumulating historical evidence. Building on this, we propose CreditDecoding, a training-free parallel decoding method that fuses Trace Credit with current logits to boost the confidence of correct but underconfident tokens, thereby accelerating denoising and improving robustness. On eight benchmarks, CreditDecoding achieves up to 5.48 times speedup with +0.48 accuracy on LLaDA-8B and consistently improves performance across diverse dLLM architectures and parameter scales. It further scales to long contexts and remains orthogonal to mainstream inference optimizations, making it a practical and widely applicable solution.

Abstract:
As Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly leverage the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to operate in complex environments, the expansion of their action spaces offers agents unsafe capabilities and underscores the risk of power-seeking. While broad action space and greater environment influence are essential for task fulfillment, they creates a fragile risk surface where minor errors or hallucinations are magnified into catastrophic failures. In response, we propose SafeMCP, a server-side defense plugin that constrains tool acquisition via predictive reasoning regarding future safety risks. SafeMCP utilizes an internal world model for look-ahead reasoning to implement a two-tier defense: proactive tool filtering to constrain hazardous power expansion and immediate intervention as a fail-safe. To train SafeMCP, we introduce a three-stage pipeline comprising environmental dynamic grounding, safe policy initialization, and reinforcement learning (RL) with dual verifiable rewards. Experiments on PowerSeeking Bench, ToolEmu, and AgentHarm show that SafeMCP achieves a safe equilibrium, effectively mitigating risks while preserving agent utility.

Abstract:
Author response (rebuttal) writing is a critical stage of scientific peer review that demands substantial author effort. In practice, authors possess domain expertise, author-only information, and response strategies – concrete forms of author expertise and intent – and seek NLP assistance that integrates these signals into author response generation (ARG). Yet this author-in-the-loop paradigm lacks formal NLP formulation and systematic study: no dataset provides fine-grained author signals, existing ARG work lacks author inputs and controls, and no evaluation measures response reflection of author signals and effectiveness in addressing reviewer concerns. To fill these gaps, we introduce (i) Re³Align, the first large-scale dataset of aligned review–response–revision triplets, where revisions proxy author signals; (ii) REspGen, an author-in-the-loop ARG framework supporting flexible author input, multi-attribute control, and evaluation-guided refinement; and (iii) REspEval, a comprehensive evaluation suite with 20+ metrics spanning input utilization, controllability, response quality, and discourse. Experiments with SOTA LLMs demonstrate the benefits of author input and evaluation-guided refinement, the impact of input specificity on response quality, and controllability–quality trade-offs. We release our dataset, generation and evaluation tools.

Abstract:
The rapid growth of short video platforms has made multimodal fake news more prevalent. Existing detectors suffer from two major limitations: (I) global-alignment bias that overemphasizes holistic cross-modal matching and thus misses subtle, localized inconsistencies; and (II) LLM-based methods that leverage powerful generative reasoning to identify cognitive forgeries but inherently suffer from hallucinations and high inference latency. To overcome these limitations, we propose PCDD, a novel Perception-Cognition Dual-driven Detector that jointly observes the form and probes the logic for short video fake news detection. The perception stream exposes fine-grained cross-modal conflicts by amplifying localized inconsistencies into explicit discrepancies. The cognition stream transfers reasoning capabilities from LLMs to a lightweight student to mine cognitive forgeries, while reducing the risk of hallucinations and eliminating reliance on LLMs at inference. Experiments on real-world datasets show that PCDD consistently outperforms baselines, while improving interpretability and robustness in data scarcity scenarios. Our code is available at: https://github.com/SeinCore/PCDD.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced unified reasoning over text, images, and videos, but their inference is hindered by the rapid growth of key–value (KV) caches. Each visual input expands into thousands of tokens, causing caches to scale linearly with context length and remain resident in GPU memory throughout decoding, which leads to prohibitive memory overhead and latency even on high-end GPUs. A common solution is to compress caches under a fixed allocated budget at different granularities: token-level uniformly discards less important tokens, layer-level varies retention across layers, and head-level redistributes budgets across heads. Yet these approaches stop at allocation and overlook the heterogeneous behaviors of attention heads that require distinct compression strategies. We propose HybridKV, a hybrid KV cache compression framework that integrates complementary strategies in three stages: heads are first classified into static or dynamic types using text-centric attention; then a top-down budget allocation scheme hierarchically assigns KV budgets; finally, static heads are compressed by text-prior pruning and dynamic heads by chunk-wise retrieval. Experiments on 11 multimodal benchmarks with Qwen2.5-VL-7B show that HybridKV reduces KV cache memory by up to 7.9× and achieves 1.52× faster decoding, with almost no performance drop or even higher relative to the full-cache MLLM.

Abstract:
While multimodal large language models can describe visual content, their ability to generate executable procedures remains underexplored. CrochetBench presented in this paper evaluates this shift from describing to doing through fine-grained procedural reasoning in crochet: models must recognize stitches, select structurally appropriate instructions, and generate compilable procedures. We adopt the CrochetPARADE DSL as our intermediate representation, enabling structural validation and functional evaluation via execution. The benchmark covers tasks including stitch classification, instruction grounding, and both natural language and image-to-DSL translation. Across all tasks, performance sharply decreases as the evaluation shifts from surface-level similarity to executable correctness, revealing limitations in long-range symbolic reasoning and 3D-aware procedural synthesis. Our proposed CrochetBench offers a new lens for assessing procedural competence in multimodal models and highlights the gap between surface-level understanding and executable precision in real-world creative domains. Code is available at https://github.com/Peiyu-Georgia-Li/crochetBench.

Abstract:
The rise of Omni-modality Large Language Models (OLLMs) capable of jointly processing text, audio, and visual inputs marks a major step toward general intelligence. Ensuring their alignment with human preferences requires effective Omni-modality Reward Models (ORMs), which serve as surrogates for human judgment to guide OLLMs behavior. However, ORMs evaluation remains underdeveloped in the previous literature. Existing benchmarks are largely text-centric or limited to bimodal tasks, restricting comprehensive assessment for ORMs. To bridge this gap, we introduce Omni-RewardBench, the first benchmark for comprehensive evaluation of ORMs across modalities. In short, our contributions are threefold: (1) a hybrid automatic-annotation and human-verification pipeline to construct high-quality evaluation data; (2) extensive experiments on 20+ models, including inherently omni-modal and modality-bridged systems. Our experimental results demonstrate that current OLLMs fall short as reward models, revealing several common failure modes such as perception failure, modality dominance failure, and cross-modal fusion failure; and (3) strong correlations between Omni-RewardBench scores and downstream performance (IID r = 0.94, OOD r = 0.72), validating its reliability as a predictor of real-world capability and alignment quality.

Abstract:
What enables large language models (LLMs) to effectively model user preferences in sequential recommendation? Our investigation reveals that existing preference-alignment approaches largely rely on binary pairwise comparisons, overlooking two critical factors: preference intensity (the structured strength of affinity or aversion) and temporal context (the extent to which recent interactions better reflect a user’s current intent). Through controlled experiments, we show that leveraging comprehensive feedback with structured preference signals substantially improves recommendation performance, indicating that binary modeling discards essential information. Motivated by these findings, we propose RecPO, a unified preference optimization framework that maps both explicit and implicit feedback into a common preference signal and constructs adaptive reward margins that jointly account for preference intensity and interaction recency. Experiments across five datasets show that RecPO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while exhibiting behavioral patterns aligned with human decision-making, including favoring immediate satisfaction, maintaining preference coherence, and avoiding dispreferred items. Our results highlight that preference intensity and temporal context are fundamental ingredients for effective LLM-based recommendation. Code: https://github.com/zyouyang/RecPO

Abstract:
Hallucination, broadly referring to unfaithful, fabricated, or inconsistent content generated by LLMs, has wide-ranging implications. Therefore, a large body of effort has been devoted to detecting LLM hallucinations, as well as designing benchmark datasets for evaluating these detectors. In this work, we first establish a desiderata of properties for hallucination detection benchmarks (HDBs) to exhibit for effective evaluation. A critical look at existing HDBs through the lens of our desiderata reveals that none of them exhibits all the properties. We identify two largest gaps: (1) RAG-based grounded benchmarks with long context are severely lacking (partly because length impedes human annotation); and (2) Existing benchmarks do not make available realistic label noise for stress-testing detectors although real-world use-cases often grapple with label noise due to human or automated/weak annotation. To close these gaps, we build and open-source a new RAG-based HDB called TRIVIA+ that underwent a rigorous human annotation process. Notably, our benchmark exhibits all desirable properties including (1) TRIVIA+ contains samples with the longest context in the literature; and (2) we design and share three sets of noisy labels with different, sample-dependent noise schemes. Finally, we perform experiments on RAG-based HDBs, including our TRIVIA+, using popular SOTA detectors that reveal new insights: (i) ample room remains for current detectors to reach the performance ceiling on RAG-based HDBs, (ii) the basic LLM-as-a-Judge baseline performs competitively, and (iii) label noise hinders detection performance. We expect that our findings, along with our proposed benchmark, will motivate and foster needed research on hallucination detection for RAG-based tasks.

Abstract:
Evaluating cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models (LLMs) is challenging, as correct answers in a target language may arise either from genuine transfer or from prior exposure during pre-training. We present LiveCLKTBench, an automated generation pipeline specifically designed to isolate and measure cross-lingual knowledge transfer. Our pipeline identifies self-contained, time-sensitive knowledge entities from real-world domains, filters them based on temporal occurrence, and verifies them against the model’s knowledge. The documents of these valid entities are then used to generate factual questions, which are translated into multiple languages to evaluate transferability across linguistic boundaries. Using LiveCLKTBench, we evaluate several LLMs across five languages and observe that cross-lingual transfer is strongly influenced by linguistic distance and often asymmetric across language directions. While larger models improve transfer, the gains diminish with scale and vary across domains. These findings provide new insights into multilingual transfer and demonstrate the value of LiveCLKTBench as a reliable benchmark for future research.

Abstract:
Spatio-temporal reasoning in time series involves the explicit synthesis of temporal dynamics, spatial dependencies, and textual context. This capability is vital for high-stakes decision-making in systems such as traffic networks, power grids, and disease propagation. However, the field remains underdeveloped because most existing works prioritize predictive accuracy over reasoning. To address the gap, we introduce ST-Bench, a benchmark consisting of four core tasks, including etiological reasoning, entity identification, correlation reasoning, and in-context forecasting, developed via a network SDE-based multi-agent data synthesis pipeline. We then propose STReasoner, a model that integrates time series, graph structure, and text for explicit reasoning. To promote spatially grounded logic, we introduce S-GRPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm that rewards performance gains specifically attributable to spatial information. Experiments show that STReasoner achieves average accuracy gains between 17% and 135% at only 0.004x the cost of proprietary models and generalizes robustly to real-world data.

Abstract:
Code agents are increasingly trusted to autonomously fix bugs on platforms such as GitHub, yet their security evaluation focuses almost exclusively on functional correctness. In this paper, we reveal a novel type of threat to real-world code-agents: functionally correct yet vulnerable (FCV) patches, which pass all test cases but contain vulnerable code. With our proposed FCV-Attack, we demonstrate that SOTA LLMs (e.g., ChatGPT and Claude) and agent scaffolds (e.g., SWE-agent and OpenHands) are all vulnerable to this FCV threat; across 12 agent-model combinations on SWE-Bench, the attack only requires black-box access and a single query to the code agent to perform the attack. For example, for CWE-538 (information exposure vulnerability), the FCV-Attack attains an attack success rate of 40.7% on GPT-5 Mini + OpenHands. Our results reveal an important security threat overlooked by current evaluation paradigms and urge the development of security-aware defenses for code agents.

Abstract:
Incorrect information poses significant challenges by disrupting content veracity and integrity, yet most detection approaches struggle to jointly balance textual content verification with external knowledge modification under collapsed attention geometries. To address this issue, we propose a dual-head reasoning framework, BiMind, which disentangles content-internal reasoning from knowledge-augmented reasoning. In BiMind, we introduce three core innovations: (i) an attention geometry adapter that reshapes attention logits via token-conditioned offsets and mitigates attention collapse; (ii) a self-retrieval knowledge mechanism, which constructs an in-domain semantic memory through kNN retrieval and injects retrieved neighbors via feature-wise linear modulation; (iii) the uncertainty-aware fusion strategies, including entropy-gated fusion and a trainable agreement head, stabilized by a symmetric Kullback-Leibler agreement regularizer. To quantify the knowledge contributions, we define a novel metric, Value-of-eXperience (VoX), to measure instance-wise logit gains from knowledge-augmented reasoning. Experiment results on public datasets demonstrate that our BiMind model outperforms advanced detection approaches and provides interpretable diagnostics on when and why knowledge matters. Our BiMind model and the tested datasets are available at https://github.com/cvzh/BiMind.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at photorealistic generation, yet often struggle to represent abstract meaning such as idiomatic interpretations of noun compounds. To study whether high visual fidelity interferes with idiomatic compositionality under visual abstraction, we introduce DIVA, a controlled benchmark that replaces high-fidelity visual detail with schematic iconicity by generating paired, sense-anchored visualizations for literal and idiomatic readings.We further propose Semantic Alignment Gap ( 𝛥 ), an architecture-agnostic metric that quantifies divergence between literal and idiomatic visual grounding.We additionally introduce a directional signed bias b(t) to separately measure the direction and strength of literal preference.Evaluating 8 recent VLMs, we reveal a consistent Literal Superiority Bias: model scale alone does not resolve literal preference, and increased visual fidelity is associated with weaker symbolic alignment, suggesting cognitive interference from hyper-realistic imagery. Our findings suggest that improving compositional understanding requires iconographic abstraction of visual input and anchoring interpretation and generation in intended meaning.

Abstract:
Deep Research (DR) tools (e.g. OpenAI DR) help researchers cope with ballooning publishing counts. Such tools can synthesize scientific papers to answer researchers’ queries, but lack understanding of their users. We change that in MyScholarQA (MySQA), a personalized DR tool that: 1) infers a profile of a user’s research interests; 2) proposes personalized actions for a user’s input query; and 3) writes a multi-section report for the query that follows user-approved actions. We first test MySQA with NLP’s standard protocol: we design a benchmark of synthetic users and LLM judges, where MySQA beats baselines in citation metrics and personalized action-following. However, we suspect this process does not cover all aspects of personalized DR users value, so we interview users in an online version of MySQA to unmask them. We reveal nine nuanced errors of personalized DR undetectable by our LLM judges, and we study qualitative feedback to form lessons for future DR design. In all, we argue for a pillar of personalization that easy-to-use LLM judges can lead NLP to overlook: real progress in personalization is only possible with real users.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise for annotation purposes, yet questions remain about their ability to capture human label variation (HLV) — genuine disagreement between annotators often observed across NLP tasks. Here, we investigate how label and explanation variation manifests within and across LLMs with respect to the Natural Language Inference (NLI) task. Using zero-shot prompting with exact human annotation instructions, we treat individual model generations as participants and examine three response sampling strategies: varying generation parameters, leveraging within-family model size differences, and pooling responses from distinct LLMs. We show that, while model ensembles can generate label distributions similar to humans, they likewise exhibit distinct, idiosyncratic judgments and disagreement patterns. We further analyze explanation variation, observing that, although models generate longer explanations than humans, they demonstrate substantially less stylistic diversity. Our findings suggest that, while LLMs may serve as useful tools for generating diverse annotations, they should not be viewed as drop-in replacements for human annotators — particularly in applications requiring authentic representation of diversity in human judgments, such as NLI.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have underscored their vulnerability to safety alignment jailbreaks, particularly when subjected to downstream fine-tuning. However, existing mitigation strategies primarily focus on reactively addressing jailbreak incidents after safety guardrails have been compromised, removing harmful gradients during fine-tuning, or continuously reinforcing safety alignment throughout fine-tuning. As such, they tend to overlook a critical upstream factor: the role of the original safety-alignment data. This paper therefore investigates the degradation of safety guardrails through the lens of representation similarity between upstream alignment datasets and downstream fine-tuning tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that high similarity between these datasets significantly weakens safety guardrails, making models more susceptible to jailbreaks. Conversely, low similarity between these two types of datasets yields substantially more robust models and thus reduces harmfulness score by up to 10.33%. By highlighting the importance of upstream dataset design in the building of durable safety guardrails and reducing real-world vulnerability to jailbreak attacks, these findings offer actionable insights for fine-tuning service providers to prioritize upstream models with low jailbreak risk.

Abstract:
Legal consultation question answering (Legal CQA) presents unique challenges compared to traditional legal QA tasks, including the scarcity of high-quality training data, complex task composition, and strong contextual dependencies. To address these, we construct JurisCQAD, a large-scale dataset of over 43,000 real-world Chinese legal queries annotated with expert-validated positive and negative responses, and design a structured task decomposition that converts each query into a legal element graph integrating entities, events, intents, and legal issues. We further propose JurisMA, a modular multi-agent framework supporting dynamic routing, statutory grounding, and stylistic optimization. Combined with the element graph, the framework enables strong context-aware reasoning, effectively capturing dependencies across legal facts, norms, and procedural logic. Trained on JurisCQAD and evaluated on a refined LawBench, our system significantly outperforms both general-purpose and legal-domain LLMs across multiple lexical and semantic metrics, demonstrating the benefits of interpretable decomposition and modular collaboration in Legal CQA.

Abstract:
High-resolution Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) face prohibitive computational costs during inference due to the explosion of visual tokens. Existing acceleration strategies, such as token pruning or layer sparsity, suffer from severe "backbone dependency", performing well on Vicuna or Mistral architectures (e.g., LLaVA) but causing significant performance degradation when transferred to architectures like Qwen. To address this, we leverage truncated matrix entropy to uncover a universal three-stage inference lifecycle, decoupling visual redundancy into universal Intrinsic Visual Redundancy (IVR) and architecture-dependent Secondary Saturation Redundancy (SSR). Guided by this insight, we propose HalfV, a framework that first mitigates IVR via a unified pruning strategy and then adaptively handles SSR based on its specific manifestation. Experiments demonstrate that HalfV achieves superior efficiency-performance trade-offs across diverse backbones. Notably, on Qwen25-VL, it retains 96.8% performance at a 4.1 × FLOPs speedup, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/civilizwa/HalfV .

Abstract:
Reward modeling lies at the core of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), yet most existing reward models rely on scalar or pairwise judgments that fail to capture the multifaceted nature of human preferences. Recent studies have explored rubrics-as-rewards (RaR) that uses structured criteria to capture multiple dimensions of response quality. However, producing rubrics that are both reliable and scalable remains a key challenge. In this work, we introduce OpenRubrics, a diverse, large-scale collection of (prompt, rubric) pairs for training rubric-generation and rubric-based reward models. To elicit discriminative and comprehensive evaluation signals, we introduce Contrastive Rubric Generation (CRG), which derives both hard rules (explicit constraints) and principles (implicit qualities) by contrasting preferred and rejected responses. We further remove noisy rubrics via preserving preference–label consistency. Across multiple reward-modeling benchmarks, our rubric-based reward model, Rubric-RM, surpasses strong size-matched baselines by 8.4%. These gains transfer to policy models on instruction-following and biomedical benchmarks.The model weights and datasets are publicly available at https://huggingface.co/OpenRubrics.

Abstract:
Harmful memes are ever-shifting in the Internet communities, which are difficult to analyze due to their type-shifting and temporal-evolving nature. Although these memes are shifting, we find that different memes may share invariant principles, i.e., the underlying design concept of malicious users, which can help us analyze why these memes are harmful. In this paper, we propose RepMD, an ever-shifting harmful meme detection method based on the design concept reproduction. We first refer to the attack tree to define the Design Concept Graph (DCG), which describes steps that people may take to design a harmful meme. Then, we derive the DCG from historical memes with design step reproduction and graph pruning. Finally, we use DCG to guide the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to detect harmful memes. The evaluation results show that RepMD achieves the highest accuracy with 81.1% and has slight accuracy decreases when generalized to type-shifting and temporal-evolving memes. Human evaluation shows that RepMD can improve the efficiency of human discovery on harmful memes, with 15 ∼ 30 seconds per meme.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enables parameter-efficient fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs), and recent Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) extensions further enhance flexibility by dynamically combining multiple LoRA experts. However, existing MoE-augmented LoRA methods assume that experts operate independently, often leading to unstable routing, expert dominance. In this paper, we propose TalkLoRA, a communication-aware MoELoRA framework that relaxes this independence assumption by introducing expert-level communication prior to routing. TalkLoRA equips low-rank experts with a lightweight Talking Module that enables controlled information exchange across expert subspaces, producing a more robust global signal for routing. Theoretically, we show that expert communication smooths routing dynamics by mitigating perturbation amplification while strictly generalizing existing MoELoRA architectures. Empirically, TalkLoRA consistently outperforms vanilla LoRA and MoELoRA across diverse language understanding and generation tasks, achieving higher parameter efficiency and more balanced expert routing under comparable parameter budgets. These results highlight structured expert communication as a principled and effective enhancement for MoE-based parameter-efficient adaptation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often exhibit undesirable behaviors, such as safety violations and hallucinations. Although inference-time steering offers a cost-effective way to adjust model behavior without updating its parameters, existing methods often fail to be simultaneously effective, utility-preserving, and training-efficient due to their rigid, one-size-fits-all designs and limited adaptability. In this work, we present FineSteer, a novel steering framework that decomposes inference-time steering into two complementary stages—conditional steering and fine-grained vector synthesis—allowing fine-grained control over when and how to steer internal representations. In the first stage, we introduce a Subspace-guided Conditional Steering (SCS) mechanism that preserves model utility by avoiding unnecessary steering. In the second stage, we propose a Mixture-of-Steering-Experts (MoSE) mechanism that captures the multimodal nature of desired steering behaviors and generates query-specific steering vectors for improved effectiveness. Through tailored designs in both SCS and MoSE, FineSteer maintains robust performance on general queries while adaptively optimizing steering vectors for targeted inputs in a training-efficient manner. Extensive experiments on safety and truthfulness benchmarks show that FineSteer outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in overall performance (e.g., a 7.6% improvement on TruthfulQA over Llama-3), achieving stronger steering performance with minimal utility loss. The code is available at https://github.com/YukinoAsuna/FineSteer

Abstract:
In multivariate long-term time series forecasting, it is widely believed that the effectiveness of self-attention arises from its attention matrix. We challenge this assumption with a counterintuitive finding: our experiments, conducted on three classic and three latest Transformer models, show that dot-product attention can be replaced by element-wise operations without token interaction, such as the addition and Hadamard product, while maintaining or even improving accuracy. This leads to our central hypothesis: the effectiveness of self-attention in this task stems not from the dynamic attention matrix, but from the multi-branch feature extraction inherent in the parallel projections to Query, Key, and Value matrices and their fusion. To validate this, we construct a simple multi-branch MLP that isolates the ‘multi-branch mapping with element-wise operation’ structure from the Transformer and show that it achieves competitive performance. Our results indicate that the source of performance in self-attention has been misattributed, suggesting that the true benefit lies in the architectural principle of multi-branch mapping and fusion, not in the attention matrix.

Abstract:
Codec-based language models (LMs) have revolutionized text-to-speech (TTS). However, standard codecs entangle timbre and prosody, which hinders independent control in continuation-based LMs. To tackle this challenge, we propose DisCo-Speech, a zero-shot controllable TTS framework featuring a disentangled speech codec (DisCodec) and an LM-based generator. The core component DisCodec employs a two-stage design: 1) tri-factor disentanglement to separate speech into content, prosody, and timbre subspaces via parallel encoders and hybrid losses; and 2) fusion and reconstruction that merges content and prosody into unified content-prosody tokens suitable for LM prediction, while jointly optimizing reconstruction to address the disentanglement-reconstruction trade-off. This allows the LM to perform prosodic continuation from a style prompt while the decoder injects target timbre, enabling flexible zero-shot control. Experiments demonstrate that DisCo-Speech achieves competitive voice cloning and superior zero-shot prosody control. By resolving the core entanglement at the codec level, DisCo-Speech provides a robust foundation for controllable speech synthesis. Audio samples are available at: https://disco-speech.github.io/DisCo-demo/. Code and weights will be released at: https://github.com/disco-speech/DisCo-Speech upon acceptance.

Abstract:
Temporal reasoning is crucial for large language models (LLMs) to understand event concurrency and complex temporal interactions in natural language. Recent approaches rely on the LLM to infer temporal relations between events and largely overlook the inherent structural nature of temporal relationships. In this work, we propose ODL-TempLLM (Ontology-Guided and Description Logic–Constrained Temporal Reasoning with LLMs), a novel paradigm for temporal reasoning with LLMs that shifts focus from internal inference to the explicit modeling of temporal structure. ODL-TempLLM leverages ontology learning to explicitly construct structured temporal knowledge, employs a symbolic reasoner to deductively reason about temporal relations and uses logic-constrained retrieval augmentation to obtain relevant facts.Experiments results evaluated across there datasets via various LLM backbones show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 2.07–31.83 F1 points and 1.00–30.73 EM points, exhibiting strong generalization and highlighting the potential of explicit temporal reasoning.

Abstract:
Modeling coordination among generative agents in complex multi-round decision-making presents a core challenge for AI and operations management. Although behavioral experiments have revealed cognitive biases behind supply chain inefficiencies, traditional methods face scalability and control limitations. We introduce a scalable experimental paradigm using Large Language Models (LLMs) to simulate multi-stage supply chain dynamics. Grounded in a Hierarchical Reasoning Framework, this study specifically analyzes the impact of cognitive heterogeneity on agent interactions. Unlike prior homogeneous settings, we employ DeepSeek and GPT agents to systematically vary reasoning sophistication across supply chain tiers. Through rigorously replicated and statistically validated simulations, we investigate how this cognitive diversity influences collective outcomes. Results indicate that agents exhibit myopic and self-interested behaviors that exacerbate systemic inefficiencies. However, we demonstrate that information sharing effectively mitigates these adverse effects. Our findings extend traditional behavioral methods and offer new insights into the dynamics of AI-enabled organizations. This work underscores both the potential and limitations of LLM-based agents as proxies for human decision-making in complex operational environments.

Abstract:
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning significantly enhances the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), its autoregressive nature incurs prohibitive latency constraints. Current efforts to mitigate this via token compression often fail by blindly applying text-centric metrics to multimodal contexts. We identify a critical failure mode termed Visual Amnesia, where linguistically redundant tokens are erroneously pruned, leading to hallucinations. To address this, we introduce V-Skip that reformulates token pruning as a Visual-Anchored Information Bottleneck (VA-IB) optimization problem. V-Skip employs a dual-path gating mechanism that weighs token importance through both linguistic surprisal and cross-modal attention flow, effectively rescuing visually salient anchors. Extensive experiments on Qwen2-VL and Llama-3.2 families demonstrate that V-Skip achieves a speedup with negligible accuracy loss. Specifically, it preserves fine-grained visual details, outperforming other baselines over 30% on the DocVQA.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has catalyzed the emergence of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) that have pushed reasoning capabilities to new heights. While their performance has garnered significant excitement, exploring the internal mechanisms driving these behaviors has become an equally critical research frontier. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the mechanistic understanding of LRMs, organizing recent findings into three core dimensions: 1) training dynamics, 2) reasoning mechanisms, and 3) unintended behaviors. By synthesizing these insights, we aim to bridge the gap between black-box performance and mechanistic transparency. Finally, we discuss under-explored challenges to outline a roadmap for future mechanistic studies, including the need for applied interpretability, improved methodologies, and a unified theoretical framework.

Abstract:
Generating coherent and controllable long-form content remains a persistent challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). While reasoning-enhanced models have demonstrated success in logic-intensive domains, our evaluation reveals that they suffer from a severe length collapse in open-ended writing, where performance degrades sharply as target lengths exceed 2,000 words. We attribute this failure to the limitation of static hierarchical planning, which struggles to provide dynamic guidance over extended contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Interleaved Structural Chain-of-Thought (IS-CoT) framework. Unlike external agentic workflows, IS-CoT embeds a dynamic Plan-Write-Reflect cycle into the generation process, enabling continuous strategy adaptation and global alignment without additional assistance. Based on this framework, we construct a high-quality dataset of interleaved reasoning traces via a multi-teacher pipeline and train IS-Writer-8B. Experiments demonstrate that IS-Writer-8B achieves state-of-the-art performance on challenging long-form benchmarks (e.g., +3.08 vs. DeepSeek-V3.2 on LongBench-Write), exhibiting robust length compliance and coherence competitive with significantly larger proprietary models.

Abstract:
In many reasoning tasks, large language models (LLMs) rely on structured external knowledge, such as graphs and tables, which is typically linearized into sequential token representations. However, even when sufficient knowledge is available, LLMs can still produce hallucinated outputs, and the underlying mechanisms behind such failures remain poorly understood. We investigate these mechanisms and find that hallucinations arise from systematic internal dynamics rather than random noise. First, attention disproportionately concentrates toward shortcut-like structural cues rather than distributing across the full context. Second, feed-forward representations fail to ground the provided knowledge, causing the model to revert to parametric memory. Moreover, our results indicate that hallucination is consistently associated with failures in semantic grounding within feed-forward layers, while attention allocation exhibits greater task-dependent variability. Finally, we show that these mechanistic patterns generalize beyond single-hop graphs to multi-hop and tabular settings, enabling effective hallucination detection across structured knowledge formats.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) aligned via outcome-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) frequently exhibit a critical failure mode: they achieve high performance on in-distribution benchmarks while demonstrating brittle reasoning capabilities on out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks. We term this phenomenon Reward-Induced Manifold Collapse. We establish a theoretical framework bridging Structural Causal Models (SCM) and the Information Bottleneck (IB) principle to explain this paradox. We define reasoning as a high-complexity causal process and shortcut learning as the exploitation of low-complexity spurious correlations. Under the implicit inductive bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), models optimized for outcome rewards are biased toward shortcut solutions whenever the training distribution allows for a “Markovian Screening” of the true causal mechanism. We derive a new generalization bound based on Semantic Coverage Measure ( 𝜂 ) rather than sample size, showing why data scaling on homogeneous distributions may fail to correct reasoning flaws. We also show that Process Reward Models (PRMs) function as Topological Filters, enforcing step-wise mutual information constraints that render the low-complexity shortcut manifold inadmissible. These results provide a mathematical grounding for the role of process supervision beyond simple credit assignment.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in high-stakes applications, making their interpretability increasingly important. Existing interpretability methods are typically categorized into internal and external perspectives, which are often studied in isolation and tend to overlook two key aspects: causality and temporal dynamics. Explanations are often limited to surface correlations or static dependencies, failing to capture how influences evolve during autoregressive generation. To address these limitations, we propose a causal and dynamic interpretability framework for LLM generation. We first characterize the backdoor-adjusted causal effects of both the generated prefix and the prompt on the current token using the Structural Causal Model. Next, we introduce two metrics to quantify contextual causal influence and question–answer causal influence. Overall, our work provides a unified causal view of internal consistency and external alignment in LLM generation dynamics.

Abstract:
While large language model–powered agents can self-evolve by accumulating experience or by dynamically creating new assets (i.e., tools or expert agents), existing frameworks typically treat these two evolutionary processes in isolation. This separation overlooks their intrinsic interdependence: the former is inherently bounded by a manually predefined static toolset, while the latter generates new assets from scratch without experiential guidance, leading to limited capability growth and unstable evolution. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel paradigm of co-evolutionary Capability Expansion and Experience Distillation. Guided by this paradigm, we propose the Mem 2 Evolve, which integrates two core components: Experience Memory and Asset Memory. Specifically, Mem 2 Evolve leverages accumulated experience to guide the dynamic creation of assets, thereby expanding the agent’s capability space while simultaneously acquiring new experience to achieve co-evolution. Extensive experiments across 6 task categories and 8 benchmarks demonstrate that Mem 2 Evolve achieves improvement of 18.53% over standard LLMs, 11.80% over agents evolving solely through experience, and 6.46% over those evolving solely through asset creation, establishing it as a substantially more effective and stable self-evolving agent framework.

Abstract:
Diffusion models promise efficient parallel text generation but rely on bidirectional attention, creating a structural mismatch with pre-trained Autoregressive (AR) models. This incompatibility precludes reusing robust AR priors, necessitating prohibitive pre-training from scratch. To bridge this gap, we propose FLUID, a framework that efficiently adapts AR backbones to the diffusion paradigm. By enforcing Strictly Causal Alignment, FLUID enables seamless initialization from standard GPT-style checkpoints, circumventing the need for massive pre-training. Furthermore, we introduce Elastic Horizons, an entropy-driven mechanism that dynamically modulates denoising strides based on local information density rather than fixed schedules. Experiments demonstrate that FLUID achieves state-of-the-art performance while reducing training costs by orders of magnitude, effectively reconciling established AR foundations with efficient parallel generation. Our code is available at https://huggingface.co/MYTH-Lab/FLUID.

Abstract:
Graphical User Interface (GUI) grounding requires mapping natural language instructions to precise pixel coordinates. However, due to visually homogeneous elements and dense layouts, models typically grasp semantic intent yet fail to achieve precise localization. While scaling sampling attempts (Pass@k) reveals potential gains, static self-consistency strategies derived from geometric clustering often yield limited improvements, as the model’s predictions tend to be spatially dispersed. In this paper, we propose replacing static consistency strategies with a learnable selection mechanism that selects the optimal target by critiquing its own proposals rendered on the screenshot. Given the significant disparity between the model’s grounding and critiquing capabilities, we propose a co-evolving Propose-and-Critic framework. To jointly optimize these, we introduce a maturity-aware adaptive co-evolutionary reinforcement learning paradigm. This approach dynamically balances the training objectives of proposer and critic, where the diversity of the proposer’s outputs enhances critic robustness, while the critic’s maturing discrimination capability conversely unlocks the proposer’s potential for extensive spatial exploration, fostering the mutual reinforcement and co-evolution of both capabilities, thereby ensuring generalizability to adapt to diverse and complex interface layouts. Extensive experiments over 6 benchmarks show that our method significantly enhances both capabilities.

Abstract:
Recent studies integrate Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) to further enhance the performance of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods in Large Language Model (LLM) applications. Existing methods employ homogeneous MoE-LoRA architectures composed of LoRA experts with either similar or identical structures and capacities. However, these approaches often suffer from representation collapse and expert load imbalance, which negatively impact the potential of LLMs. To address these challenges, we propose a heterogeneous Mixture-of-Adapters (MoA) approach. This method dynamically integrates PEFT adapter experts with diverse structures, leveraging their complementary representational capabilities to foster expert specialization, thereby enhancing the effective transfer of pre-trained knowledge to downstream tasks. MoA supports two variants: (i) Soft MoA achieves fine-grained integration by performing a weighted fusion of all expert outputs; (ii) Sparse MoA activates adapter experts sparsely based on their contribution, achieving this with negligible performance degradation. Experimental results demonstrate that heterogeneous MoA outperforms homogeneous MoE-LoRA methods in both performance and parameter efficiency. Our project is available at https://github.com/DCDmllm/MoA .

Abstract:
Existing evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) on static benchmarks is vulnerable to data contamination and leaderboard overfitting, critical issues that obscure true model capabilities. To address this, we introduce LLMEval-Fair, a framework for dynamic evaluation of LLMs. LLMEval-Fair is built on a proprietary bank of 220k graduate-level questions, from which it dynamically samples unseen test sets for each evaluation run. Its automated pipeline ensures integrity via contamination-resistant data curation, a novel anti-cheating architecture, and a calibrated LLM-as-a-judge process achieving 90% agreement with human experts, complemented by a relative ranking system for fair comparison. An 30-month longitudinal study of nearly 60 leading models reveals a performance ceiling on knowledge memorization and exposes data contamination vulnerabilities undetectable by static benchmarks. The framework demonstrates exceptional robustness in ranking stability and consistency, providing strong empirical validation for the dynamic evaluation paradigm. LLMEval-Fair offers a robust and credible methodology for assessing the true capabilities of LLMs beyond leaderboard scores, promoting the development of more trustworthy evaluation standards.

Abstract:
Traditional Video Quality Assessment (VQA) focuses narrowly on aesthetic fidelity, overlooking the complex social dynamics that define quality in User-Generated Content (UGC). In this work, we propose a paradigm shift from signal-centric metrics to human-centric resonance assessment. We introduce CASTER (Community-Aware Assessment of Social Textual Engagement and Resonance), a new task that evaluates whether a UGC item achieves positive community resonance based on its multimodal attributes rather than visual quality alone. To address this, we present MEDEA (Multimodal Engagement-Driven Evaluation Architecture), which introduces a novel Social Chain-of-Thought (Social-CoT) mechanism. Unlike traditional logical CoT, Social-CoT performs multimodal perspective-taking, instantiating diverse viewer personas to simulate collective cognitive and emotional reactions (i.e., the "community mind") before deriving a quality judgment. MEDEA is trained via a two-stage approach involving supervised fine-tuning and process-supervised reinforcement learning with Social Alignment Reward to ensure reasoning paths are grounded in authentic human social cognition. To support this task, we release CASTER-Bench, a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark covering diverse UGC categories. Experiments demonstrate that MEDEA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on CASTER-Bench while providing interpretable and empathetic reasoning paths that align with real community feedback.

Abstract:
The emergence of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has substantially expanded model capabilities beyond text-only understanding, enabling unified inference across both visual and textual modalities and supporting a broader range of real-world applications. To comprehensively evaluate the perception, understanding, reasoning, and cognition capabilities of LVLMs throughout the entire financial business workflow in Chinese contexts, we introduce CFMME, a novel Chinese financial multimodal evaluation benchmark. CFMME comprises 6,052 instances spanning from fundamental academic knowledge to complex real-world applications, covering eight primary financial image modalities and four core multimodal tasks. On CFMME, we conduct a thorough evaluation of representative LVLMs. The results show that the state-of-the-art model attains an overall accuracy of 66.11% on the question answering task and an average score of 77.18 on the detection, recognition, and information extraction tasks, indicating substantial room for improvement in current LVLMs. In addition, we conduct detailed analyses of error causes, cross-modal capabilities, and multi-orientation settings, yielding valuable insights for future research. We hope that CFMME will spur further progress in LVLMs, especially by improving their performance on multiple multimodal tasks in the financial domain.

Abstract:
Contemporary progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) has revealed notable inferential capacities via reinforcement learning (RL) employing verifiable rewards. However, “zero-RL” approaches relying on fixed prompt templates introduce substantial sampling inefficiencies for weak LLMs, as most problems generate invalid outputs during accuracy-driven filtration. To solve this, we propose Cog-Rethinker, a novel hierarchical metacognitive RL framework. Cog-Rethinker enhances the rollout procedure by improving sample utilization through a two-stage framework leveraging human cognition. First, it prompts the policy to decompose zero-accuracy problems into subproblems. Second, it prompts the policy to refine answers by referencing previous wrong solutions. Moreover, to enable cold-starts and maintain train-test consistency, Cog-Rethinker applies supervised fine-tuning using correct samples from these stages. Experimental results demonstrate Cog-Rethinker’s superior performance on mathematical reasoning benchmarks and its improved sample efficiency that accelerates convergence compared to baselines.

Abstract:
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) struggles with the scarcity of high-quality, diverse training data. To address this limitation, we propose LinkSyn, a KP-graph-based synthesis framework that for the first time enables flexible control over discipline and difficulty distributions while balancing KP coverage and popularity. LinkSyn extracts KPs from question-answering (QA) seed data and constructs a KP graph to synthesize diverse QA data from multiple seeds strongly linked by KPs and sampled from graph walks. Specifically, LinkSyn incorporates (1) a knowledge value function to guide the adjustment of path sampling probability and balance KP coverage and popularity during graph walks; (2) diffusion-based synthesis via a strong reasoning model by leveraging multiple seeds with dense logical associations along each path; and (3) high-difficulty QA enhancement within given disciplines by flexible difficulty adjustments. By executing LinkSyn, we synthesize LinkQA, a diverse multi-disciplinary QA dataset with 50B tokens. Extensive experiments on Llama-3 8B demonstrate that continual pre-training with LinkQA yields an average improvement of 11.51% on MMLU and CMMLU, establishing new SOTA results. LinkQA consistently enhances performance across model size and initial FLOPs scales.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled dynamic reasoning in automated data analytics, yet recent multi-agent systems remain limited by rigid, single-path workflows that restrict strategic exploration and often lead to suboptimal outcomes. To overcome these limitations, we propose SPIO (Sequential Plan Integration and Optimization), a framework that replaces rigid workflows with adaptive, multi-path planning across four core modules: data preprocessing, feature engineering, model selection, and hyperparameter tuning. In each module, specialized agents generate diverse candidate strategies, which are cascaded and refined by an optimization agent. SPIO offers two operating modes: SPIO-S for selecting a single optimal pipeline, and SPIO-E for ensembling top-k pipelines to maximize robustness. Extensive evaluations on Kaggle and OpenML benchmarks show that SPIO consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an average performance gain of 5.6%. By explicitly exploring and integrating multiple solution paths, SPIO delivers a more flexible, accurate, and reliable foundation for automated data science.

Abstract:
Decoder-only large language models (LLMs) have been increasingly adopted to build embedding models for diverse tasks. To overcome the inherent limitations of causal attention in representation learning, many existing methods modify the attention mechanism to be bidirectional, potentially undermining LLMs’ ability to extract semantic information acquired during pre-training. Meanwhile, leading unidirectional approaches often rely on extra input text to generate contextualized embeddings, inevitably increasing computational costs. In this work, we propose Causal2Vec, a general-purpose embedding model tailored to enhance the performance of decoder-only LLMs without altering their original architectures or introducing significant computational overhead. Specifically, we first employ a lightweight BERT-style model to pre-encode the input text into a single Contextual token, which is then prepended to the LLM’s input sequence, allowing each token to capture contextualized information even without attending to future tokens. Furthermore, to mitigate the recency bias introduced by last-token pooling, we concatenate the last hidden states of Contextual and EOS tokens as the final text embedding. In practice, Causal2Vec achieves a new state-of-the-art performance on the MTEB benchmark among models trained solely on publicly available retrieval datasets.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful post-training paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, reinforcement learning for LLMs faces substantial data scarcity challenges, including the limited availability of high-quality external supervision and the constrained volume of model-generated experience. These limitations make data-efficient reinforcement learning a critical research direction. In this survey, we present the first systematic review of reinforcement learning for LLMs under data scarcity. We propose a bottom-up hierarchical framework built around three complementary perspectives: the data-centric perspective, the training-centric perspective, and the framework-centric perspective. We develop a taxonomy of existing methods, summarize representative approaches in each category, and analyze their strengths and limitations. Our taxonomy aims to provide a clear conceptual foundation for understanding the design space of data-efficient RL for LLMs and to guide researchers working in this emerging area. We hope this survey offers a comprehensive roadmap for future research and inspires new directions toward more efficient and scalable reinforcement learning post-training for LLMs.

Abstract:
Document Question Answering (DQA) involves generating answers from a document based on a user’s query, representing a key task in document understanding. This task requires interpreting visual layouts, which has prompted recent studies to adopt multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) that processes page images for answer generation. However, in multimodal RAG, visual DQA struggles to utilize a large number of images effectively, as the retrieval stage often retains only a few candidate pages (e.g., Top-4), causing informative but less visually salient content to be overlooked in favor of common yet low-information pages. To address this issue, we propose a Multi-Armed Bandit–based DQA framework (MAB-DQA) to explicitly model the varying importance of multiple implicit aspects in a query. Specifically, MAB-DQA decomposes a query into aspect-aware subqueries and retrieves an aspect-specific candidate set for each. It treats each subquery as an arm and uses preliminary reasoning results from a small number of representative pages as reward signals to estimate aspect utility. Guided by an exploration–exploitation policy, MAB-DQA dynamically reallocates retrieval budgets toward high-value aspects. With the most informative pages and their correlations, MAB-DQA generates the expected results. On four benchmarks, MAB-DQA shows an average improvement of 5%-18% over the state-of-the-art method, consistently enhancing document understanding. Codes are available at https://github.com/ElephantOH/MAB-DQA.

Abstract:
Formalising informal mathematical reasoning into formally verifiable code is a significant challenge for large language models. In scientific fields such as physics, domain-specific machinery ( e.g. Dirac notation, vector calculus) imposes additional formalisation challenges that modern LLMs and agentic approaches have yet to tackle. To aid autoformalisation in scientific domains, we present FormalScience; a domain-agnostic human-in-the-loop agentic pipeline that enables a single domain expert (without deep formal language experience) to produce syntactically correct and semantically aligned formal proofs of informal reasoning for low economic cost. Applying FormalScience to physics, we construct FormalPhysics, a dataset of 200 university-level (LaTeX) physics problems and solutions (primarily quantum mechanics and electromagnetism), along with their Lean4 formal representations. Compared to existing formal math benchmarks, FormalPhysics achieves perfect formal validity and exhibits greater statement complexity. We evaluate open-source models and proprietary systems on a statement autoformalisation task on our dataset via zero-shot prompting, self-refinement with error feedback, and a novel multi-stage agentic approach, and explore autoformalisation limitations in modern LLM-based approaches. We provide the first systematic characterisation of semantic drift in physics autoformalisation in terms of concepts such as notational collapse and abstraction elevation which reveals what formal language verifies when full semantic preservation is unattainable. We release the codebase together with an interactive UI-based FormalScience system which facilitates autoformalisation and theorem proving in scientific domains beyond physics.[]

Abstract:
Embodied Action Sequence Planning focuses on the capability of embodied agents to implement action planning via environmental perception. This technology enables diverse intelligent assistance for real-world scenarios such as home and office environments. To address the limitations of existing embodied agents in meeting the requirement for proactivity and achieving joint understanding of visual and audio information, this study investigates the ability of embodied agents to proactively provide assistance through action sequence planning based on joint understanding of vision and audio perception without explicit human instructions. Correspondingly, we propose PEAP, the first multimodal proactive embodied action sequence planning dataset. We evaluate the performance of multiple Large Language Models on the PEAP dataset. The results demonstrate that these models still exhibit significant deficiencies on this task particularly lacking accurate environmental perception capabilities. Furthermore, ablation experiment and replacement experiment further corroborate that the joint understanding of multimodal information can significantly improve the models’ performance on proactive embodied action sequence planning task.

Abstract:
Integrating external medical knowledge into longitudinal electronic health record modeling is a prevailing paradigm to mitigate clinical data sparsity. However, existing approaches face a reliability-timeliness dilemma, struggling to balance the structural authority of static ontologies with the reasoning flexibility of large language models. Furthermore, most frameworks overlook the risk of relative negative transfer, where indiscriminately fusing task-irrelevant knowledge can introduce noise or even cause conflicts that weakens patient-specific signals. In this paper, we propose TrustKE, a Trustworthy Knowledge Enhancement framework. First, we construct a dual-layer knowledge graph that anchors dynamic, evidence-based chain-of-thought reasoning from medical literature within the stable structure of medical knowledge graph. Second, we introduce a task-adaptive knowledge selection mechanism that dynamically optimizes the graph, retaining only task-specific signals. Extensive experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV across four clinical tasks show that TrustKE outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Our analysis confirms that TrustKE effectively mitigates negative transfer while offering transparent reasoning for clinical decision-making.

Abstract:
Prosody—the melody of speech—conveys critical information often not captured by the words or text of a message.In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify how much is conveyed by prosody that is not recoverable from text alone, and, crucially, what prosody conveys.Our approach applies large speech and language models to estimate the mutual information between a particular dimension of an utterance’s meaning (e.g., its emotion) and any of its communication channels (e.g., audio or text).We then use this approach to quantify the information conveyed by audio and text about sarcasm, emotion, and questionhood, using speech from television and podcasts.We find that for sarcasm and emotion, the audio channel, and by implication the prosodic channel, transmits over an order of magnitude more information about these features than the text channel alone, at least when long-term context beyond the current sentence is unavailable.For questionhood, prosody provides comparatively less additional information.We conclude by outlining a program applying our approach to more dimensions of meaning, communication channels, and languages.

Abstract:
A criminal judicial opinion represents the judge’s disposition of a case, including the decision rationale and sentencing. Automatically generating such opinions can assist in analyzing sentencing consistency and provide judges with references to past similar cases. However, current research typically approaches this task by dividing it into two isolated subtasks: legal reasoning and sentencing prediction. This separation often leads to inconsistency between the reasoning and predictions, failing to meet real-world judicial requirements. Furthermore, prior studies rely on manually creating knowledge to enhance applicability, yet such methods remain limited in practical deployment. To address these limitations and better align with legal practice, we propose a new LegalAI task: Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation, which simultaneously produces both legal reasoning and sentencing decisions. To achieve this, we introduce LegalChainReasoner framework that applies structured legal chains to guide the model through comprehensive case assessments. By integrating factual premises, composite legal conditions, and sentencing conclusions, our approach ensures flexible knowledge injection and end-to-end opinion generation. Experiments on real-world, open-source Chinese legal case datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms baseline models.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong semantic capabilities, their resilience to manipulative linguistic patterns such as logical fallacies remains an underexplored area. Prior work has focused on the ability of LLMs to identify or classify fallacies, but their robustness against these fallacies in persuasive contexts remains largely unexplored.To address this gap, we introduce LoFa (Logical Fallacy), a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate LLM robustness against fallacies. We first construct the LoFa dataset via a multi-agent pipeline, pairing factual questions with fallacious arguments. Then, we develop a multi-round debate framework to assess model resilience under sustained attacks.Furthermore, to disentangle robustness from a model’s inherent knowledge limitations, we propose a new metric, LFR@k (Logical Fallacy Resistance), to quantify performance. Our experiments reveal that different LLMs exhibit varied robustness to distinct types of fallacies, highlighting unique vulnerability profiles across models.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been increasingly used as automatic evaluators—a paradigm known as MLLM-as-a-Judge. However, their reliability and vulnerabilities to biases remain underexplored. We find that many MLLM judges fail to reliably integrate key visual or textual cues, yielding unreliable evaluations when evidence is missing or mismatched, and exhibiting instability under semantically irrelevant perturbations. To address this, we systematically define Compositional Bias in MLLM-as-a-Judge systems and introduce MM-JudgeBias, a benchmark for evaluating it. MM-JudgeBias introduces controlled perturbations across Query, Image, and Response, and evaluates model behavior via two complementary metrics: Bias-Deviation (BD) for sensitivity and Bias-Conformity (BC) for stability. Our dataset of over 1,800 curated and refined multimodal samples, drawn from 29 source benchmarks, enables a fine-grained diagnosis of nine bias types across diverse tasks and domains. Experiments on 26 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal systematic modality neglect and asymmetric evaluation tendencies, underscoring the need for more reliable judges.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at algorithmic code generation, they struggle with front-end development, where correctness is judged on rendered pixels and interaction. We present ReLook, an agentic, vision-grounded reinforcement learning framework that empowers an agent to close a robust generate–diagnose–refine loop by invoking a multimodal LLM (MLLM) as a tool. During training, the agent employs an MLLM-in-the-loop to serve as a visual critic, evaluating code via screenshots and providing actionable feedback. Crucially, we enforce a strict zero-reward policy for invalid renders to guarantee renderability and mitigate reward hacking. To prevent behavioral collapse, we introduce Forced Optimization, a strict acceptance rule that admits only improving revisions, yielding monotonically better trajectories. At inference, we decouple the critic and run a lightweight, critic-free self-edit cycle, keeping latency comparable to base decoding while retaining most of the gains. Across three widely used benchmarks, ReLook consistently outperforms strong baselines in vision-grounded front-end code generation, highlighting the benefits of agentic perception, visual rewards, and training–inference decoupling.

Abstract:
Scaling LLM-based agents to long-horizon deep research is constrained by the context-noise trade-off, where linear history accumulation degrades reasoning and dilutes fine-grained evidence. To address this, we introduce the Cognitive Scaffold, a factorized memory architecture that decouples the cognitive state into a Fluid Working Context for immediate reasoning and a persistent Knowledge Graph for long-term retention. Unlike unstructured summarization, our framework employs a Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning (RFT) pipeline to crystallize saturated context into structured event snapshots, strictly enforcing atomic constraints to preserve numerical values and entities. During reasoning, a thought-driven dual-path retrieval mechanism enables the agent to proactively recover precise evidence. Empirical evaluations on Xbench-DeepSearch, BrowseComp-ZH, and GAIA demonstrate that Cognitive Scaffold consistently outperforms baselines, achieving 74.7% Avg@3 and 87.0% Pass@3 on Xbench-DeepSearch, 48.5% Avg@3 and 65.9% Pass@3 on BrowseComp-ZH, and 72.8% Avg@3 and 88.3% Pass@3 on GAIA, while reducing compression hallucinations to 5.3%. We open-source our codebase to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
While automatic metrics drive progress in Machine Translation (MT) and Text Summarization (TS), existing metrics have been developed and validated almost exclusively for English and other high-resource languages. This narrow focus leaves Indian languages—spoken by over 1.5 billion people—largely overlooked, casting doubt on the universality of current evaluation practices. To address this gap, we introduce ITEM, a large-scale benchmark that systematically evaluates the alignment of 26 automatic metrics with human judgments across six major Indian languages, enriched with fine-grained annotations. Our extensive evaluation—covering agreement with human judgments, sensitivity to outliers, language-specific reliability, inter-metric correlations, and resilience to controlled perturbations—reveals four central findings: (1) LLM-based evaluators show the strongest alignment with human judgments at both segment and system levels; (2) outliers exert a significant impact on metric-human agreement; (3) In TS, metrics are more effective at capturing content fidelity, whereas in MT, they better reflect fluency; and (4) Metrics differ in their robustness and sensitivity when subjected to diverse perturbations. Collectively, these findings offer critical guidance for advancing metric design and evaluation in Indian languages.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds language models in external evidence, but multi-hop question answering remains difficult because iterative pipelines must control what to retrieve next and when the available evidence is adequate. In practice, systems may answer from incomplete evidence chains, or they may accumulate redundant or distractor-heavy text that interferes with later retrieval and reasoning. We propose S2G-RAG (Structured Sufficiency and Gap-judging RAG), an iterative framework with an explicit controller, S2G-Judge. At each turn, S2G-Judge predicts whether the current evidence memory supports answering and, if not, outputs structured gap items that describe the missing information. We map these gap items into the next retrieval query, producing stable multi-turn retrieval trajectories. To reduce noise accumulation, we maintain a sentence-level Evidence Context by extracting a compact set of relevant sentences from retrieved documents. Experiments on TriviaQA, HotpotQA, and 2WikiMultiHopQA show that S2G-RAG improves multi-hop QA performance and robustness under multi-turn retrieval. Furthermore, S2G-RAG can be integrated into existing RAG pipelines with a lightweight component, without modifying the search engine or retraining the generator.

Abstract:
Binary Code Similarity Detection (BCSD) plays a vital role in various security applications, including vulnerability identification, malware analysis, and code plagiarism detection. With the growing adoption of deep neural networks (DNNs), substantial progress has been made in recognizing and classifying similar code segments. However, DNN-based BCSD methods often exhibit low accuracy and robustness because they struggle to capture fine-grained and high-level program semantics. In contrast, such semantics are typically captured through natural language interpretations of source code by large language models (LLMs). Yet, LLM-based BCSD methods are constrained by their large model sizes and high inference latency. To alleviate these limitations, this paper proposes BinSKD. The key idea is to leverage an LLM-based BCSD method as the teacher model and transfer its knowledge of high-level program semantics to various DNN-based student models. Specifically, to avoid propagating errors from the teacher to the student, we introduce selective distillation, selecting targets with accurate semantics according to their detection retrieval. In addition, to mitigate the noise introduced by a number of negative samples during distillation, we further propose discrepancy-weighted sampling to focus on the sampleswhere the student’s prediction notably deviates from the teacher’s. Our experiments show that BinSKD yields Recall@1 improvements of 14.5%–91.2% for DNN-based BCSD methods and enables HermesSim to match the teacher’s performance with orders-of-magnitude efficiency.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models has increasingly blurred the boundary between human-written and AI-generated text, raising societal risks such as misinformation dissemination, authorship ambiguity, and threats to intellectual property rights. These concerns highlight the urgent need for effective and reliable detection methods. While existing training-free approaches often achieve strong performance by aggregating token-level signals into a global score, they typically assume uniform token contributions, making them less robust under short sequences or localized token modifications. To address these limitations, we propose Exons-Detect, a training-free method for AI-generated text detection based on an exon-aware token reweighting perspective. Exons-Detect identifies and amplifies informative exonic tokens by measuring hidden-state discrepancy under a dual-model setting, and computes an interpretable translation score from the resulting importance-weighted token sequence. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that Exons-Detect achieves state-of-the-art detection performance and exhibits strong robustness to adversarial attacks and varying input lengths. In particular, it attains a 2.2% relative improvement in average AUROC over the strongest prior baseline on DetectRL.

Abstract:
The GPT-4 technical report suggests that downstream performance can be predicted from pre-training signals, but offers little methodological detail on how to quantify this. This work address this gap by modeling knowledge retention, the capacity of a pre-trained language model to memorize factual information from its corpus, and introduce a principled method to estimate it prior to training. We propose Size-dependent Mutual Information (SMI), an information-theoretic predictor that integrates knowledge frequency, knowledge specificity, and model size to forecast closed-book question answering (QA) accuracy. SMI is validated through large-scale document retrieval over the disclosed pre-training corpora of 21 public and 3 custom models, combined with a robust multi-template QA evaluation. Experiments show that SMI significantly outperforms repetition-based baselines and achieves R² > 0.7 in predicting QA accuracy for models above 1B parameters, without additional training. The analysis further reveals diminishing returns from scaling data and model size and provides evidence for an intrinsic upper bound on knowledge retention achievable by pre-training alone, motivating retrieval and other augmentation strategies.

Abstract:
In real-world scenarios, multimodal information continuously evolves, with new entity and relation types emerging, necessitating timely updates to multimodal knowledge graphs for supporting downstream tasks. However, existing methods struggle to balance real-time adaptability and computational efficiency in continual learning scenarios. To this end, this paper proposes the Continual Multimodal Entity and Relation Joint Extraction (CMERJE) task and a Multimodal Prompt-based Boundary-enhanced Continual (MPBoCo) framework. Specifically, MPBoCo incrementally stores task-specific knowledge via learnable multimodal prompts, dynamically matches relevant prompts for each instance, and fuses them into a frozen backbone model for task-specific reasoning. Subsequently, the boundary-enhanced dual-branch module leverages the auxiliary branch to preserve local syntactic continuity and provide boundary guidance. Experimental results demonstrate that MPBoCo achieves superior performance in real-world scenarios, significantly outperforming baseline methods by 5.5% and 7.2% in 10-task and 5-task settings, respectively.

Abstract:
The rapid expansion of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem introduces a combinatorially complex tool space, rendering existing frameworks inadequate for comprehensive agent evaluation. To address this problem, we propose SGVEF-LOOP, a coverage-guided framework for progressive topological exploration and fact-augmented metamorphic testing. SGVEF operates via a synergistic closed loop: it navigates sparse regions using adaptive sampling, synthesizes oracle-free metamorphic pairs grounded in static knowledge, enforces dual-constraint validation to ensure consistency and solvability, and leverages execution feedback to iteratively optimize exploration. Deploying this framework yields a high-fidelity benchmark achieving 100% node coverage and saturating 80.54% of the theoretical transition bound (estimated via Chao1). Evaluation of 8 diverse MCP Agents reveals capability stratification and exposes critical behavioral anomalies—such as reasoning instability—that conventional metrics fail to capture. Consequently, this work establishes a generalizable paradigm for scalable, rigorous agent evaluation in dynamic environments.

Abstract:
We introduce Parallel Coordinated Reasoning (PaCoRe), a training-and-inference framework designed to overcome a central limitation of contemporary language models: their inability to scale test-time compute (TTC) far beyond sequential reasoning under a fixed context window. PaCoRe departs from the traditional sequential paradigm by driving TTC through massive parallel exploration coordinated via a message-passing architecture in multiple rounds. Each round launches many parallel reasoning trajectories, compacts their findings into context-bounded messages, and synthesizes these messages to guide the next round and ultimately produce the final answer. Trained end-to-end with large-scale, outcome-based reinforcement learning, the model masters the synthesis abilities required by PaCoRe and scales to multi-million-token effective TTC without exceeding context limits. The approach yields strong improvements across diverse domains and notably pushes reasoning beyond frontier systems in mathematics: an 8B model reaches 94.5% on HMMT 2025, surpassing GPT-5’s 93.2% by scaling effective TTC to roughly two million tokens. We open-source model checkpoints, training data, and the full inference pipeline to accelerate follow-up work.

Abstract:
Entity matching (EM) requires fine-grained contextual understanding and domain knowledge. Recent work shows that large language models (LLMs) can serve as strong matchers across domains, but most methods either make independent pairwise decisions or rely on manually designed composite pipelines, thus lacking flexibility in realistic multi-candidate settings. At the same time, they typically ignore inference cost at scale. We formulate LLM-based EM with candidates as a cost-aware sequential decision problem and propose CaRL-EM, a reinforcement learning controller that manages LLM operations. Given the state of an anchor record, its candidate set, and the cost, CaRL-EM adaptively chooses among different operators (Match/Compare/Select/Decide) and model capacities to maximize a quality–cost objective. The policy interacts with abstract operators, allowing the same controller to be reused with different underlying LLM backends at inference time without retraining. Experiments on 7 benchmarks show that CaRL-EM (i) learns to dynamically plan the usage of inexpensive and expensive operators based on task complexity, (ii) achieves robust zero-shot transfer across diverse datasets and domains, and (iii) consistently achieves a better quality–cost trade-off than strong LLM-based baselines and manually designed pipelines, yielding a lower inference cost at comparable or higher quality.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in interpreting single medical images. However, real-world clinical diagnosis is intrinsically a multi-view process, requiring the synthesis of information across volumetric slices, temporal sequences, and comparative modalities. Existing benchmarks fail to capture this complexity, limiting the assessment of models in realistic clinical workflows. To bridge this gap, we introduce MedMultiBench, the first large-scale benchmark specifically designed for medical multi-image understanding. Comprising 11,392 expert-curated samples, MedMultiBench evaluates MLLMs across four distinct dimensions: Joint Reasoning, Comparative Analysis, Comprehensive Perception, and In-Context Learning. We benchmark 13 state-of-the-art MLLMs, revealing that while current models excel in single-view tasks, they struggle significantly with multi-image contexts. Our experiments identify a performance degradation in open-source models when processing increased visual loads, whereas closed-source models demonstrate better scalability. MedMultiBench provides a robust framework to facilitate the development of MLLMs capable of holistic clinical reasoning.

Abstract:
Maintaining consistency in long-term dialogues remains a fundamental challenge for LLMs, as standard retrieval mechanisms often fail to capture the temporal evolution of historical states. While memory-augmented frameworks offer a structured alternative, current systems rely on static prompting of closed-source models or suffer from ineffective training paradigms with sparse rewards. We introduce MemBuilder, a reinforcement learning framework that trains models to orchestrate multi-dimensional memory construction with attributed dense rewards. MemBuilder addresses two key challenges: (1) Sparse Trajectory-Level Rewards: we employ synthetic session-level question generation to provide dense intermediate rewards across extended trajectories; and (2) Multi-Dimensional Memory Attribution: we introduce contribution-aware gradient weighting that scales policy updates based on each component’s downstream impact. Experimental results show that MemBuilder enables a 4B-parameter model to outperform state-of-the-art closed-source baselines, exhibiting strong generalization across long-term dialogue benchmarks.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models typically assume linguistic context invariably enhances visual understanding. We study this assumption in semantic adversarial scenarios, specifically magic tricks, where narration deliberately diverges from physical reality. We introduce MagicBench, a diagnostic benchmark of 402 videos for evaluating MLLMs under hierarchical linguistic interference, together with a Physical Constraint Set (PCS) protocol for assessing adherence to physical laws. Evaluation uncovers a Semantic Dependency Paradox: (1) Semantic anchoring: Entity nouns act as anchors aiding localization, paradoxically boosting performance despite false predicates. (2) Visual Agency Loss: In semantic vacuums, multimodal performance collapses 12.4% (p < 0.01) below the vision-only "capability probe". This gap persists under symmetric prompting, suggesting a form of functional perception suppression in which autonomous visual search may be under-utilized in multimodal settings without linguistic triggers. Causal interventions via spatial prompting and signal magnification provide evidence that internal reasoning remains functional, supporting the interpretation of a perceptual access bottleneck. Our findings suggest MLLMs function as "language-guided passive observers", advocating for perceptually-independent architectures that decouple sensory agency from linguistic dominance. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Ink-Dawn/MagicBench

Abstract:
While recent studies show the effectiveness of in-context learning (ICL) for tabular data prediction, they also reveal significant fairness issues in large language models (LLMs). Prior work to mitigate fairness issues often employs interventions relying on subjective demonstration selection. Its effectiveness varies significantly with the specific demonstration content, leading to low controllability. Moreover, the improvement of fairness is highly unstable across different models and tasks. To address the challenges of low controllability and limited stability in fairness interventions, we propose Fairness-Aware Context-Contrastive Decoding (Fair-CCD). Fair-CCD first constructs Structural Bias Templates (SBTs), motivated by behavioral patterns observed in demonstrations, to encode the relationship between sensitive attributes and predicted labels in a structured and controllable form. During inference, Fair-CCD injects multiple SBTs and contrasts the model’s responses, generating two differential signals that guide fairness adjustment and preserve task performance. By leveraging attention signals to scale decoding adjustments guided by the difference signals, Fair-CCD achieves stable and adaptive bias mitigation across models and tasks. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Fair-CCD consistently improves fairness metrics without degrading task accuracy.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly deployed in multi-agent systems to overcome context limitations by distributing information across agents. However, whether LLM-based agents can reliably coordinate when each observes only a fragment of the global problem remains unclear. Existing benchmarks often prescribe agent roles or interaction patterns, conflating coordination ability with role-based priors. We introduce SILO-BENCH, a role-free benchmark for evaluating free-form collaboration under information silos. The benchmark comprises 30 algorithmic tasks with exact ground-truth answers, organized into 3 complexity levels based on optimal communication complexity: aggregation, mesh, and global shuffle. To systematically probe coordination capabilities, we instantiate 54 configurations by varying 3 communication protocols, 6 agent scales and 3 frontier LLMs, conducting 1,620 experiments. We evaluate agent behavior along three dimensions: Success Rate, Token Consumption, and Communication Density. Our experiments reveal a fundamental Communication-Reasoning Gap: agents communicate actively, yet fail to translate interaction into effective distributed computation. Performance collapses as complexity increases, with Level-III tasks achieving zero success beyond 50 agents. These findings demonstrate that current LLMs cannot escape information silos through coordination alone. SILO-BENCH provides a foundation for tracking progress toward genuinely collaborative multi-agent systems. The code is available at https://github.com/jwyjohn/acl26-silo-bench.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as central planners in Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN), yet their complexity increasingly obscures their internal decision-making. Existing interpretability methods typically isolate temporal criticality from feature salience, creating an alignment gap and failing to account for the behavioral instability of black-box agents. To address this, we propose DEFT, a unified dual-view framework that demystifies agent behavior by jointly analyzing when a decision is pivotal and what visual evidence grounds it. Featuring a dual-head architecture with a shared latent representation, DEFT employs a Mask Head for counterfactual-based criticality detection and an Action Head that leverages an ensemble of surrogates to recover robust visual cues. Extensive experiments on MatterPort3D across three LLM-based agents demonstrate that DEFT outperforms baselines in both temporal and feature fidelity. User studies further validate its utility, showing 78% alignment with human intuition.

Abstract:
Personality disorders (PDs) are a complex class of mental health (MH) conditions characterized by persistent patterns of cognition, behavior, and emotional regulation that deviate from cultural norms. While social media has become a valuable resource for MH research, NLP has largely focused on more prevalent conditions (e.g., depression), leaving PDs underexplored. In this work, we introduce PersonalityDBench, a large-scale, clinically grounded dataset that supports multidimensional study of personality pathology, and standardized, reproducible evaluation of LLM steering toward clinically grounded behavioral targets. The dataset comprises two parts: (1) PRISMA and (2) PersonaDSteering. (1) PRISMA (PeRsonality dISorder MAnifestations) is a clinically annotated collection of social media content spanning the full spectrum of PDs. It links clinically validated diagnostic criteria and dimensional trait frameworks with computational annotation and analysis methods to support fine-grained, multidimensional study of how PDs manifests in naturalistic, free-form language. Building on PRISMA, (2) PersonaDSteering is a benchmark for LLM steering evaluation that operationalizes clinically grounded PD profiles into structured behavioral elicitation tasks, enabling multidimensional steerability assessment beyond single-behavior settings and supporting PD-consistent persona construction for simulated patient generation. This dataset may have application in the study and modeling of PD and powering personality-specific text generation for adaptive, personalized chat systems.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has driven substantial progress in reasoning-intensive domains like mathematics. However, optimizing open-ended generation remains challenging due to the lack of ground truth. While rubric-based evaluation offers a structured proxy for verification, existing methods suffer from scalability bottlenecks and coarse criteria, resulting in a supervision ceiling effect. To address this, we propose an automated Coarse-to-Fine Rubric Generation framework. By synergizing principle-guided synthesis, multi-model aggregation, and difficulty evolution, our approach produces comprehensive and highly discriminative criteria capable of capturing the subtle nuances. Based on this framework, we introduce RubricHub, a large-scale (110k) and multi-domain dataset. We validate its utility through a two-stage post-training pipeline comprising Rubric-based Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning (RuFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RuRL). Experimental results demonstrate that RubricHub unlocks significant performance gains: our post-trained Qwen3-14B achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on HealthBench (69.3), surpassing proprietary frontier models such as GPT-5.

Abstract:
The Key-Value (KV) cache introduces substantial memory overhead during large language model (LLM) inference. Although existing vector quantization (VQ) methods reduce KV cache usage and provide flexible representational capacity across bit-widths, they suffer severe performance degradation at ultra-low bit-widths due to key cache outliers that hinder effective codebook utilization. To address this challenge, we propose VecInfer, a novel VQ method for aggressive KV cache compression while enabling efficient inference. By applying smooth and Hadamard transformations, VecInfer suppresses outliers in the key cache, enabling the codebook to comprehensively cover the original data distribution and thereby reducing quantization difficulty. To facilitate efficient deployment, we design an optimized CUDA kernel that fuses computation with dequantization to minimize memory access overhead. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that VecInfer consistently outperforms existing quantization baselines across both long-context understanding and mathematical reasoning tasks. With only 2-bit quantization, VecInfer achieves performance comparable to full precision, while delivering up to 2.7× speedup in large-batch self-attention computation and 8.3× reduction in single-batch end-to-end latency on Llama-3.1-8B with a 196k sequence length.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely used for automated negotiation, but their high computational cost and privacy risks limit deployment in privacy-sensitive, on-device settings such as mobile assistants or rescue robots. Small language models (SLMs) offer a viable alternative, yet struggle with the complex emotional dynamics of high-stakes negotiation. We introduce EmoMAS, a Bayesian multi-agent framework that transforms emotional decision-making from reactive to strategic. EmoMAS leverages a Bayesian orchestrator to coordinate three specialized agents: game-theoretic, reinforcement learning, and psychological coherence models. The system fuses their real-time insights to optimize emotional state transitions while continuously updating agent reliability based on negotiation feedback. This mixture-of-agents architecture enables online strategy learning without pre-training. We further introduce four high-stakes, edge-deployable negotiation benchmarks across debt, healthcare, emergency response, and educational domains. Through extensive agent-to-agent simulations across all benchmarks, both SLMs and LLMs equipped with EmoMAS consistently surpass all baseline models in negotiation performance while balancing ethical behavior. These results show that strategic emotional intelligence is a key driver of negotiation success. By treating emotional expression as a strategic variable within a Bayesian multi-agent optimization framework, EmoMAS establishes a new paradigm for effective, private, and adaptive negotiation AI suitable for high-stakes edge deployment. The code is available at https://github.com/Yunbo-max/EmoMAS.

Abstract:
Users often rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) for processing multiple documents or performing analysis over a number of instances. For example, analysing the overall sentiment of a number of movie reviews requires an LLM to process the sentiment of each review individually in order to provide a final aggregated answer. While LLM performance on such individual tasks is generally high, there has been little research on how LLMs perform when dealing with multi-instance inputs. In this paper, we perform acomprehensive evaluation of the multi-instance processing (MIP) ability of LLMs for tasks in which they excel individually. The results show that all LLMs follow a pattern of slight performance degradation for small numbers of instances ( ≈ 20–100), followed by a performance collapse on larger instance counts. Crucially, our analysis shows that while context length is associated with this degradation, the number of instances has a stronger effect on the final results. This finding suggests that when optimising LLM performance for MIP, attention should be paid to both context length and, in particular, instance count.

Abstract:
Achieving realistic human-like conversation for virtual characters requires not only a simple memorization and recall of past events, but also the strategic utilization of memory to meet factual needs and social engagement. Current memory utilization relevant (e.g., memory-augmented generation, long-term dialogue, and etc.) benchmarks overlook this nuance, treating memory primarily as a static repository of facts rather than a dynamic resource to be strategically deployed in dialogues. To address this gap, we design StratMem-Bench, a new benchmark to evaluate strategic memory use in character-centric dialogues. This dataset comprises 657 instances where virtual characters must navigate heterogeneous memory pools containing required, supportive, and irrelevant memories. We also propose a framework with different evaluation metrics including Strict Memory Compliance, Memory Integration Quality, Proactive Enrichment Score and Conditional Irrelevance Rate, and to evaluate strategic memory use capabilities of virtual characters. Experiments on StratMem-Bench which leverage the state-of-the-art large language models as virtual characters show that all models perform well at distinguishing between required and irrelevant memories, but struggle once supportive memories are introduced into the decision process.

Abstract:
Interactive medical questioning is essential in clinical consultations, where physicians must actively gather necessary patient information. Yet existing medical Large Language Models (LLMs) predominantly follow a reactive paradigm, risking diagnostic errors by answering before seeking sufficient details. To bridge this gap, we propose ProMed, a reinforcement learning framework that transitions LLMs toward a proactive paradigm, enabling them to ask clinically valuable questions before decision-making. Central to ProMed is the Shapley Information Gain (SIG) reward, which quantifies a question’s clinical utility as the amount of newly acquired information, while considering its contextual importance via Shapley values. We integrate SIG into a two-stage training pipeline: (1) SIG-Guided Model Initialization uses Monte Carlo Tree Search to construct high-reward interaction trajectories for supervision, and (2) SIG-Augmented Policy Optimization, with a novel SIG-guided Reward Distribution Mechanism that prioritizes informative questions for fine-grained optimization. Experiments on partial-information medical benchmarks show that ProMed significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods by 6.29% on average and delivers a 54.45% gain over the reactive paradigm, and generalizes robustly to out-of-domain cases. Our codes are available at https://github.com/hxxding/ProMed.

Abstract:
Geoscience research requires complex analysis and domain expertise, with remote sensing (RS) observations as a key foundation. However, existing RS agents built on general-purpose LLMs remain largely domain-agnostic, resulting in brittle and error-prone workflows. Moreover, these failures are seldom consolidated into a reusable experience for subsequent analyses. To address this issue, we introduce RSMeM, a knowledge-enhanced memory evolution mechanism that bootstraps RS agents with pre-distilled domain knowledge and iteratively integrates online experience for robust multi-step tool execution. RSMeM is composed of two components: (i) Hierarchical Knowledge Grounding, which performs taxonomy-aware retrieval over a hierarchical domain corpus to guide planning and tool selection; and (ii) Failure-Aware Experience Refinement, which distills failure-annotated tool-use traces into reusable constraints for next-round tool execution. By iteratively employing these two processes, RS agents can evolve to absorb task-level domain knowledge and effectively translate it into instance-level execution experience. Extensive experiments on EarthBench demonstrate that RSMeM consistently improves tool-use performance and end-to-end accuracy across a diverse set of LLM backbones. Notably, RSMeM achieves a 6% accuracy improvement on DeepSeek-V3.2 with less than 1% additional experience tokens, demonstrating the knowledge density of our distilled experience. All codes and models will be released to support reproducible research.

Abstract:
As the post-training of large language models (LLMs) advances from instruction-following to complex reasoning tasks, understanding how different data affect finetuning dynamics remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present a spectral analysis of layer-wise gradients induced by low/high-quality instruction and reasoning data for LLM post-training. Our analysis reveals that widely-studied metrics for data evaluation, e.g., IFD, InsTag, Difficulty, and Reward, can be explained and unified by spectral properties computed from gradients’ singular value decomposition (SVD). Specifically, higher-quality data are usually associated with lower nuclear norms and higher effective ranks. Notably, effective rank exhibits better robustness and resolution than nuclear norm in capturing subtle quality differences. For example, reasoning data achieves substantially higher effective ranks than instruction data, implying richer gradient structures on more complex tasks. Our experiments also highlight that models within the same family share similar gradient patterns regardless of their sizes, whereas different model families diverge significantly. Providing a unified view on the effects of data quality across instruction and reasoning data, this work illuminates the interplay between data quality and training stability, shedding novel insights into developing better data exploration strategies for post-training.

Abstract:
Hallucination remains a major challenge for the safe and trustworthy deployment of large language models (LLMs) in factual content generation. Prior work has explored confidence estimation as an effective approach to hallucination detection, but often relies on post-hoc self-consistency methods that require computationally expensive sampling. Verbalized confidence offers a more efficient alternative, but existing approaches are largely limited to short-form question answering (QA) tasks and do not generalize well to open-ended generation. In this paper, we propose LoVeC (Long-form Verbalized Confidence), a novel reinforcement learning (RL)–based method that trains LLMs to append an on-the-fly numerical confidence score to each generated statement during long-form generation. The confidence score serves as a direct and interpretable signal of the factuality of generation. We introduce two evaluation settings, free-form tagging and iterative tagging, to assess different verbalized confidence estimation methods. Experiments on three long-form QA datasets show that our RL-trained models achieve better calibration and generalize robustly across domains. Also, our method is highly efficient, being 20 × faster than traditional self-consistency methods while achieving better calibration.

Abstract:
Robustness has become a critical attribute for the deployment of RAG systems in real-world applications. Existing research focuses on robustness to explicit noise (e.g., document semantics) but overlooks implicit noise (spurious features). Moreover, previous studies on spurious features in LLMs are limited to specific types (e.g., formats) and narrow scenarios (e.g., ICL). In this work, we identify and study spurious features in the RAG paradigm, a robustness issue caused by the sensitivity of LLMs to semantic-agnostic features. We then propose a novel framework, SURE , to empirically quantify the robustness of RALMs against spurious features. Beyond providing a comprehensive taxonomy and metrics for evaluation, the framework’s data synthesis pipeline facilitates training-based strategies to improve robustness. Further analysis suggests that spurious features are a widespread and challenging problem in the field of RAG. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RAG-SpuriousFeatures-62B3.

Abstract:
In real-world business environments, data is stored in a variety of sources, including structured relational databases, semi-structured databases, and unstructured files. The ability to extract reasonable insights across these diverse sources is integral to data-driven decision-making. Existing benchmarks, however, are limited in assessing agents’ capabilities across these diverse data types. To address this gap, we introduce UniDataBench, a multi-source benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of data analytics agents in handling diverse data sources. Specifically, UniDataBench is constructed based on real-life industry analysis reports, employing a pipeline to synthesize data that aligns with authentic analytical trends. It encompasses diverse datasets spanning relational databases, CSV files, and NoSQL stores to reflect real-world business settings, and provides a unified framework for evaluating how effectively agents can explore multiple data formats, extract insights, and generate meaningful summaries and recommendations. Based on UniDataBench, we propose a novel LLM-based agent named ReActInsight, an autonomous agent that performs end-to-end analysis over diverse data sources by automatically discovering cross-source linkages, decomposing goals, and generating robust, self-correcting code to extract actionable insights. Our benchmark and agent together provide a framework for facilitating the development of data analytics agents in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Traffic stops are among the most frequent police–civilian interactions, and body-worn cameras (BWCs) provide a unique record of how these encounters unfold. Respect is a central dimension of these interactions, shaping public trust and perceived legitimacy, yet its interpretation is inherently subjective and shaped by lived experience, rendering community-specific perspectives a critical consideration. Leveraging unprecedented access to Los Angeles Police Department BWC footage, we introduce the first large-scale traffic-stop dataset annotated with respect ratings and free-text rationales from multiple perspectives. By sampling annotators from police-affiliated, justice-system-impacted, and non-affiliated Los Angeles residents, we enable the systematic study of perceptual differences across diverse communities. To this end, (i) we develop a domain-specific evaluation rubric grounded in procedural justice theory, LAPD training materials, and extensive fieldwork; (ii) we introduce a criterion-driven preference data construction framework for perspective-consistent alignment, and (ii) we propose a perspective-aware modeling framework that predicts personalized respect ratings and generates annotator-specific rationales for both officers and civilian drivers from traffic-stop transcripts. Across all three annotator groups, our approach improves both rating prediction performance and rationale alignment. Our perspective-aware framework enables law enforcement to better understand diverse community expectations, providing a vital tool for building public trust and procedural legitimacy.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents rely on external tools to solve complex tasks, but real-world toolsets often contain redundant tools with overlapping names and descriptions, introducing ambiguity and reducing selection accuracy. LLMs also face strict input context limits, preventing efficient consideration of large toolsets. To address these challenges, we propose ToolScope, which includes: (1) ToolScopeMerger with Auto-Correction to automatically audit and fix tool merges, reducing redundancy, and (2) ToolScopeRetriever to rank and select only the most relevant tools for each query, compressing toolsets to fit within context limits without sacrificing accuracy. Evaluations on three state-of-the-art LLMs and three open-source tool-use benchmarks show gains of 8.38% to 38.6% in tool selection accuracy, demonstrating ToolScope’s effectiveness in enhancing LLM tool use.

Abstract:
Curriculum learning (CL), which orders training data from easy to hard, has become a popular strategy for improving reasoning in large language models (LLMs). Yet prior work employs disparate difficulty metrics and training setups, leaving open fundamental questions: When does curriculum help? Which direction—forward or reverse—is better? And does the answer depend on what we measure? We address these questions through a unified offline evaluation framework that decomposes curriculum difficulty into five complementary dimensions: Problem Difficulty, Model Surprisal, Confidence Margin, Predictive Uncertainty, and Decision Variability. Through controlled post-training experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks with Llama3.1-8B, Mistral-7B, and Gemma3-4B, we find that: (i) no curriculum strategy dominates universally—the relative effectiveness of forward versus reverse CL depends jointly on model capability and task complexity; (ii) even within a single metric, samples at different difficulty levels produce distinct gains depending on task demands; and (iii) Task-aligned curricula focus on shaping the model’s final representations and generalization, whereas inner-state curricula modulate internal states such as confidence and uncertainty. Our findings challenge the notion of a universal curriculum strategy and offer actionable guidance across model and task regimes, with some metrics indicating that prioritizing decision-uncertain samples can further enhance learning outcomes.

Abstract:
Extracting structured procedural knowledge from unstructured business documents is a critical yet unresolved bottleneck in process automation. While prior work has focused on extracting linear action flows from instructional texts (e.g., recipes), it has insufficiently addressed the complex logical structures—such as conditional branching and parallel execution—that are pervasive in real-world regulatory and administrative documents. Furthermore, existing benchmarks are limited by simplistic schemas and shallow logical dependencies, restricting progress toward logic-aware large language models (LLMs). To bridge this “Logic Gap”, we introduce BREX , a carefully curated benchmark comprising 409 real-world business documents and 2,855 expert-annotated rules. Unlike prior datasets centered on narrow service scenarios, BREX spans over 30 vertical domains, covering scientific, industrial, administrative, and financial regulations.We further propose ExIde , a structure-aware reasoning framework that investigates five distinct prompting strategies, ranging from implicit semantic alignment to executable grounding via pseudo-code generation, enabling explicit modeling of rule dependencies and providing an out-of-the-box framework for different business customers without finetuning their own LLMs. We benchmark ExIde using 13 state-of-the-art LLMs. Our extensive evaluation reveals that: (1) Executable grounding serves as a superior inductive bias, significantly outperforming standard prompts in rule extraction; and (2) Reasoning-optimized models demonstrate a distinct advantage in tracing long-range dependencies and non-linear rule dependencies compared to standard instruction-tuned models.

Abstract:
Current RLHF methods such as PPO and DPO typically reduce human preferences to binary labels, which are costly to obtain and too coarse to reflect individual variation. We observe that expressions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction follow stable linguistic patterns across users, indicating that more informative supervisory signals can be extracted from free-form feedback. Building on this insight, we introduce Adaptive Reward-Following (ARF), which converts natural feedback into continuous preference trajectories and optimizes them using the novel TraceBias algorithm. Across diverse LLMs and preference domains, ARF consistently outperforms PPO and DPO, improving alignment by up to 7.6%. Our results demonstrate that continuous reward modeling provides a scalable path toward personalized and theoretically grounded RLHF.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted for tasks like draftingemails, summarizing meetings, and answering health questions. In thesesettings, users may need to share private information (e.g., contactdetails, health records). To evaluate LLMs’ ability to identify and redactsuch information, prior work introduced real-life, scenario-based benchmarks(e.g., ConfAIde, PrivacyLens) and found that LLMs can leak privateinformation in complex scenarios. However, these evaluations relied on proxy LLMs to judge the helpfulnessand privacy-preservation quality of LLM responses, rather than directlymeasuring users’ perceptions. To understand how users perceive the helpfulness and privacy-preservationquality of LLM responses to privacy-sensitive scenarios, we conducted auser study ( n=94 ) using 90 PrivacyLens scenarios. We found that users hadlow agreement with each other when evaluating identical LLM responses. Incontrast, five proxy LLMs reached high agreement, yet each proxy LLM hadlow correlation with users’ evaluations. These results indicate that proxy LLMs cannot accurately estimate users’ wide range of perceptions of utility and privacy inprivacy-sensitive scenarios. We discuss the need for more user-centeredstudies to measure LLMs’ ability to help users while preserving privacy,and for improving alignment between LLMs and users in estimating perceivedprivacy and utility.

Abstract:
Long Chain-of-Thought (LCoT), achieved by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), has proven effective in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, reasoning in current LLMs is primarily generated as plain text, where performing semantic evaluation on such unstructured data creates a computational bottleneck during training. Despite RLVR-based optimization, existing methods still suffer from coarse-grained supervision, reward hacking, high training costs, and poor generalization.To address these issues, we propose the Graph Reasoning Paradigm (GRP), which realizes structured and symbolic reasoning, implemented via graph-structured representations with step-level cognitive labels. Building upon GRP, we further design Process-Aware Stratified Clipping Group Relative Policy Optimization (PASC-GRPO), which leverages structured evaluation to replace semantic evaluation, achieves process-aware verification through graph-structured outcome rewards, and mitigates reward hacking via stratified clipping advantage estimation. Experiments demonstrate significant improvements across mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks. Data, models, and code will be released later.

Abstract:
This paper presents several strategies to automatically obtain additional examples for in-context learning, effectively transforming relation extraction from a 1-shot to a few-shot setting. Specifically, we introduce a novel strategy for example selection, in which new examples are selected based on the similarity of their underlying syntactic-semantic structure to the provided 1-shot example. We show that our strategy results in complementary word choices and sentence structures compared to LLM-generated examples. When both strategies are combined, the resulting hybrid system achieves a more holistic picture of the relations of interest than either method alone. Our framework transfers well across datasets (FS-TACRED and FS-FewRel) and LLM families(Qwen and Gemma). Overall, our hybrid system consistently outperforms alternative strategies achieving state-of-the-art performance on FS-TACRED and strong gains on a customized FewRel subset.

Abstract:
Legal consultation is essential for safeguarding individual rights and ensuring access to justice, yet remains costly and inaccessible to many individuals due to the shortage of professionals. While recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward scalable, low-cost legal assistance, current systems fall short in handling the interactive and knowledge-intensive nature of real-world consultations. To address these challenges, we introduce LeCoDe, a multi-turn benchmark dataset constructed from publicly available real-world legal consultation content and carefully processed into a de-identified, structured research resource for evaluating and advancing research on LLMs in legal consultation settings. LeCoDe contains 3,696 multi-turn consultation cases with 110,008 dialogue turns. The dataset is further enriched through expert annotation, including key facts, fact importance, and advice summaries. Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses LLMs’ consultation capabilities in terms of (1) clarification capability and (2) professional advice quality. This unified framework incorporates 12 metrics across two dimensions. Through extensive experiments on various general and domain-specific LLMs, our results reveal significant challenges in this task, with even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 achieving only 35.9% recall for clarification and 59.1% overall score for advice quality, highlighting the complexity of professional consultation scenarios. Based on these findings, we further explore several strategies to enhance LLMs’ legal consultation abilities. Our benchmark contributes to advancing research in legal domain dialogue systems, particularly in simulating more real-world user-expert interactions. The resource is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/LeCoDe.

Abstract:
Reward Models (RMs) are critical components in the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) pipeline, directly determining the alignment quality of Large Language Models (LLMs). Recently, Generative Reward Models (GRMs) have emerged as a superior paradigm, offering higher interpretability and stronger generalization than traditional scalar RMs. However, existing methods for GRMs focus primarily on outcome-level supervision, neglecting analytical process quality, which constrains their potential. To address this, we propose ReflectRM, a novel GRM that leverages self-reflection to assess analytical quality and enhance preference modeling. ReflectRM is trained under a unified generative framework for joint modeling of response preference and analysis preference. During inference, we use its self-reflection capability to identify the most reliable analysis, from which the final preference prediction is derived. Experiments across four benchmarks show that ReflectRM consistently improves performance, achieving an average accuracy gain of +3.7 on Qwen3-4B. Further experiments confirm that response preference and analysis preference are mutually reinforcing. Notably, ReflectRM substantially mitigates positional bias, yielding +10.2 improvement compared with leading GRMs and establishing itself as a more stable evaluator. Our code is available at https://github.com/yuliangCarmelo/ReflectRM.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit enhanced capabilities by Chain-of-Thought reasoning. However, the extended reasoning sequences introduce significant GPU memory overhead due to increased key-value (KV) cache. Existing KV cache compression methods mitigate memory bottlenecks but struggle in long reasoning tasks. In this paper, we analyze attention patterns in reasoning tasks and reveal a Token Importance Recurrence phenomenon: a large proportion of tokens regain high attention after multiple decoding steps, which is failed to capture by existing works and may lead to unpredictable eviction on such periodically critical tokens. To address this, we propose LazyEviction, an observation window-based lagged eviction framework retaining latent recurring tokens by prioritized eviction based on tokens’ recurrence patterns. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LazyEviction reduces KV cache by 50% 70% while maintaining comparable accuracy, outperforming existing KV cache baselines. Our implementation code can be found at https://github.com/Halo-949/LazyEviction.

Abstract:
Autoregressive LLMs perform well on relational tasks that require linking entities via relational words (e.g., father/son, friend), but it is unclear whether they learn the logical semantics of such relations (e.g., symmetry and inversion logic) and, if so, whether reversal-type failures arise from missing relational semantics or left-to-right order bias. We propose a controlled Knowledge Graph-based synthetic framework that generates text from symmetric/inverse triples, train GPT-style autoregressive models from scratch, and evaluate memorization, logical inference, and in-context generalization to unseen entities to address these questions. We find a sharp phase transition in which relational semantics emerge with sufficient logic-bearing supervision, even in shallow (2–3 layer) models, and that successful generalization aligns with stable intermediate-layer signals. Finally, order-matched forward/reverse tests and a diffusion baseline indicate that reversal failures are primarily driven by autoregressive order bias rather than deficient inversion semantics.

Abstract:
Empathetic speech dialogue requires not only understanding linguistic content but also perceiving rich paralinguistic information such as prosody, tone, and emotional intensity for affective understandings. Existing speech-to-speech large language models either rely on ASR transcription or use encoders to extract latent representations, often weakening affective information and contextual coherence in multi-turn dialogues. To address this, we propose ES4R , a framework for speech-based empathetic response generation. Our core innovation lies in explicitly modeling structured affective context before speech encoding, rather than relying on implicit learning by the encoder or explicit emotion supervision. Specifically, we introduce a dual-level attention mechanism to capture turn-level affective states and dialogue-level affective dynamics. The resulting affective representations are then integrated with textual semantics through speech-guided cross-modal attention to generate empathetic responses. For speech output, we employ energy-based strategy selection and style fusion to achieve empathetic speech synthesis. ES4R consistently outperforms strong baselines in both automatic and human evaluations and remains robust across different Large Language Model (LLM) backbones. Code: https://github.com/Bean0901/ES4R.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents excel at multi-step tasks yet frequently exhibit Action Boundary Blindness —the inability to correctly determine action granularity, scope, and completeness. Grounded in Event Segmentation Theory from cognitive science, we formalize three violation types: granularity confusion , scope creep , and boundary ambiguity . We propose four automatic metrics—Action Boundary Score (ABS), Granularity Alignment Rate (GAR), Scope Violation Rate (SVR), and Boundary-Aware Success Rate (BASR)—requiring no human annotation. Experiments on 1,655 tasks across six benchmarks ( 𝜏 -bench, WebArena, ALFWorld, TheAgentCompany, OSWorld) with seven LLMs reveal that: (1) the best model achieves only 0.424 ABS; (2) using a multi-label attribution framework validated by inter-annotator agreement ( 𝜅 = 0.78 ), boundary blindness is the primary failure mode in 37.2% of failures (25.8% as sole cause; 55.9% total involvement including contributing factors); (3) under-action dominates at 48.4%; (4) BASR is consistently ∼ 4 points lower than traditional success rate, exposing “lucky successes.” Critically, Explicit Boundary Prompting (EBP) improves ABS by 0.08–0.13 across all models, demonstrating that boundary blindness is better characterized as an elicitation gap rather than a fundamental capability limitation—LLMs possess latent boundary perception not activated by default. This finding has implications for alignment and instruction tuning. We validate metrics through state-based cross-validation and human audit, estimating ∼ 22% false positive rate from valid alternative paths, with model rankings remaining stable (Spearman 𝜌 = 1.0 ).

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with high-stakes medical standards remains a significant challenge, primarily due to the dissonance between coarse-grained preference signals and the complex, multi-dimensional nature of clinical protocols. To bridge this gap, we introduce ProMedical , a unified alignment framework grounded in fine-grained clinical criteria. We first construct ProMedical-Preference-50k , a dataset generated via a human-in-the-loop pipeline that augments medical instructions with rigorous, physician-derived rubrics. Leveraging this corpus, we propose the Explicit Criteria Injection paradigm to train a multi-dimensional reward model. Unlike traditional scalar reward models, our approach explicitly disentangles safety constraints from general proficiency, enabling precise guidance during reinforcement learning. To rigorously validate this framework, we establish ProMedical-Bench , a held-out evaluation suite anchored by double-blind expert adjudication. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that optimizing the Qwen3-8B base model via ProMedical-RM -guided GRPO yields substantial gains, improving overall accuracy by 22.3% and safety compliance by 21.7%, effectively rivaling proprietary frontier models. Furthermore, the aligned policy generalizes robustly to external benchmarks, demonstrating performance comparable to state-of-the-art models on UltraMedical. We publicly release our datasets, reward models, and benchmarks to facilitate reproducible research in safety-aware medical alignment.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) based Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) systems face two critical challenges: general-purpose models lack specialized linguistic priors for subtle grammatical distinctions, and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with Maximum Likelihood Estimation fails to optimize for precision-focused metrics, leading to systematic over-correction. We propose CSRP, a three-stage framework that progressively builds correction capability through Continual Pre-training (CPT) on 5.9M balanced samples to internalize domain knowledge, Chain-of-Thought SFT with explicit error reasoning for diagnostic transparency, and Group Relative Policy Optimization with a novel Efficiency-Aware Reward that explicitly penalizes unnecessary edits. On the NACGEC benchmark, CSRP achieves state-of-the-art performance with 50.99 F 0.5 and 57.17 precision, substantially outperforming previous best results while effectively mitigating the over-correction bias inherent in MLE-trained models. Our method also advances CSCD spelling correction to 59.61 F1, surpassing GPT-4 by 5.20 points. Comprehensive ablation studies demonstrate that the RL alignment stage contributes a 8% relative gain over the SFT baseline, and that this gain is orthogonal to the contribution of large-scale CPT, validating that explicit optimization for edit efficiency is essential for high-quality grammatical error correction. Our code is available at https://github.com/TW-NLP/ChineseErrorCorrector.

Abstract:
Recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved significant progress yet frequently suffer from visual hallucinations, often stemming from an over-reliance on language priors rather than visual evidence. Existing decoding-based approaches often rely on input perturbations to weaken language priors, but they do not explicitly decouple visual evidence from mixed vision–language representations. To address these limitations, we propose DiVE (Decoupling intra-layer Visual Evidence). DiVE dynamically identifies layers enriched with visual information and performs intra-layer decoupling to extract aggregated visual evidence. By suppressing this evidence to construct a language-prior-dominated reference distribution, DiVE employs contrastive decoding to calibrate the output logits, thereby mitigating hallucinations. Extensive experiments across diverse LVLM architectures demonstrate that DiVE achieves state-of-the-art performance among decoding-based methods on multiple benchmarks. Crucially, it eliminates the latency of an extra forward pass, offering a lightweight and efficient solution.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning has emerged as a dominant post-training approach to elicit agentic RAG behaviors such as search and planning from language models. Despite its success with larger models, applying RL to compact models (e.g., 0.5-1B parameters) presents unique challenges. The compact models exhibit poor initial performance, resulting in sparse rewards and unstable training. To overcome these difficulties, we propose Distillation-Guided Policy Optimization (DGPO), which employs cold-start initialization from teacher demonstrations and continuous teacher guidance during policy optimization. To understand how compact models preserve agentic behavior, we introduce Agentic RAG Capabilities (ARC), a fine-grained metric analyzing reasoning, search coordination, and response synthesis. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that DGPO enables compact models to achieve sophisticated agentic search behaviors, even outperforming the larger teacher model in some cases. DGPO makes agentic RAG feasible in computing resource-constrained environments.

Abstract:
The effective detection and governance of Large Language Model (LLM) generated content has become increasingly critical due to the growing risk of misuse. Despite the impressive performance of existing detectors, their reliability and potential in multilingual, real-world scenarios remain largely underexplored.In this study, we introduce DetectRL-X, a comprehensive multilingual benchmark designed to evaluate advanced detectors across 8 dimensions. The benchmark encompasses 8 languages commonly used in commercial contexts and collects human-written texts from 6 domains highly susceptible to LLM misuse. To better aligned with real-world applications, We create LLM-generated texts using 4 popular commercial LLMs, and include typical AI-assisted writing operations such as polishing, expanding, and condensing to capture authentic usage patterns. Furthermore, we develop a multilingual framework for paraphrasing and perturbation attacks to simulate diverse human modifications and writing noise, enabling stress testing of detectors across languages.Experimental results on DetectRL-X reveal the strengths and limitations of current state-of-the-art detectors when applied to diverse linguistic resources. We further analyze how domains, generators, attack strategies, text length, and refinement operations influence performance in different languages, underscoring DetectRL-X as an effective benchmark for strengthening multilingual and language-specific detectors.

Abstract:
This study contributes to a growing line of research in comparing LLM-generated texts with human-authored text, in this case, English news text. We focus in particular on the evaluation of syntactic properties through formal grammar frameworks. Our analysis compares two generations of LLMs in the context of two human-authored English news datasets from two different years. Employing the Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) formalism, we investigate the distributions of syntactic structures and lexical types of AI-generated texts and contrast them with the corresponding distributions in the human-authored New Your Times (NYT) articles. We use diversity metrics from ecology and information theory to quantify variation in grammatical constructions and lexical types. Our results show that, while English news text has changed little in the given time frame, newer, instruction-tuned LLMs display reduced syntactic and, especially, lexical diversity compared to older, non-instruction-tuned models. These findings point to future work in studying effects of instruction tuning, which, while enhancing coherence and adherence to prompts, may narrow the expressive range of model output.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training often improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs) beyond the training domain, while supervised fine-tuning (SFT) frequently leads to general capabilities forgetting. However, the mechanisms underlying this contrast remain unclear.To bridge this gap, we present a feature-level mechanistic analysis methodology to probe RL generalization using a controlled experimental setup, where RL- and SFT-tuned models are trained from the same base model on identical data. Leveraging our interpretability framework, we align internal activations across models within a shared feature space and analyze how features evolve during post-training.We find that SFT rapidly introduces many highly specialized features that stabilize early in training, whereas RL induces more restrained and continually evolving feature changes that largely preserve base models’ representations. Focusing on samples where RL succeeds but the base model fails, we identify a compact, task-agnostic set of features that directly mediate generalization across diverse tasks. Feature-level interventions confirm their causal role: disabling these features significantly degrades RL models’ generalization performance, while amplifying them improves base models’ performance. The code is available at https://github.com/danshi777/RL-generalization.

Abstract:
The growing sequence length of large language models poses significant challenges for key-value (KV) caches. Existing state-of-the-art cache eviction methods primarily analyze the inference behavior of attention heads in successful retrieval-reasoning cases, often overlooking diverse behaviors in failure cases, such as bias and distraction. This oversight limits the potential to leverage heterogeneous head behaviors for improved eviction performance. Inspired by the confusion matrix, we introduce an Attention Behavior Matrix to comprehensively analyze attention head behaviors in both success and failure scenarios. By maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio — strengthening valid reasoning pathways in success cases while inhibiting noise from bias and distraction in failure cases — we propose REtrieval-reAsoning and Logic-constructed (REAL) KV cache eviction, the first method to leverage multi-behavior analysis. Comprehensive evaluations show that REAL achieves remarkable performance across various models and benchmarks; notably, on LongBench v2, it achieves comparable accuracy to the strongest baseline, HeadKV-R2, while requiring 32x less space. By offering a novel perspective on behavior analysis, we pave the way for a shift from success-only to comprehensive, failure-aware methods in long-context modeling. Our code is available at https://github.com/yonseicasl/REAL.

Abstract:
Safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) often generate refusal responses to harmless queries due to the over-refusal problem. However, existing methods for mitigating over-refusal cannot maintain a low refusal ratio for harmless queries while keeping a high refusal ratio for malicious ones. In this paper, we analyze how system prompts with varying safety levels affect LLM refusal behaviors when facing over-refusal queries. A key observation is that, when LLMs suffer from the over-refusal issue, non-refusal tokens remain present in the next-token candidate list, but the model systematically fails to select them, despite the generation of refusal tokens. Based on this observation, we propose a training-free and model-agnostic approach, Adaptive Contrastive Decoding (AdaCD), to mitigate over-refusal while maintaining LLM safety. First, AdaCD compares the output distributions of the LLM with or without an extreme safety system prompt to refine the refusal token distribution. Second, we introduce an adaptive contrastive decoding strategy that dynamically incorporates or removes the refusal token distribution, adaptively boosting the probability of selecting refusal or non-refusal tokens. Experimental results on five benchmark datasets show that, on average, AdaCD reduces the refusal ratio for over-refusal queries by 10.35%, yet still increases the refusal ratio for malicious queries by 0.13%. Code is available at https://shorturl.at/Z31Oe.

Abstract:
This paper primarily demonstrates a method to quantitatively assess the alignment between multi-step, structured reasoning in large language models and human preferences. We introduce the Alignment Score, a semantic-level metric that compares a model-produced chain of thought traces with a human-preferred reference by constructing semantic-entropy-based matrices over intermediate steps and measuring their divergence. Our analysis shows that Alignment Score tracks task accuracy across models and hop depths, and peaks at 2-hop reasoning. Empirical results further indicate that misalignment at greater reasoning depths is driven mainly by alignment errors such as thematic shift and redundant reasoning. Viewing chain sampling as drawing from a distribution over reasoning paths, we empirically demonstrate a strong and consistent correlation between Alignment Score and accuracy, readability, and coherence, supporting its use as a diagnostic signal. The code is available.

Abstract:
Despite extensive safety alignment, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. However, existing methods generally lack the capability for continuous learning and self-evolution from interactions, limiting the diversity and adaptability of attack strategies. To address this, we propose ASTRA, an automated framework capable of autonomously discovering, retrieving, and evolving attack strategies. ASTRA operates on a closed-loop "attack-evaluate-distill-reuse” mechanism, which not only generates attack prompts but also automatically distills reusable strategies from every interaction. To systematically manage these strategies, we introduce a dynamic three-tier strategy library (Effective, Promising, and Ineffective) that categorizes strategies based on performance. This hierarchical memory mechanism enables the framework to enhance efficiency by leveraging successful patterns while optimizing the exploration space by avoiding known failures. Extensive experiments in a black-box setting demonstrate that ASTRA significantly outperforms existing baselines.

Abstract:
Human self-report questionnaires are increasingly used in NLP to benchmark and audit large language models (LLMs), from persona consistency to safety and bias assessments. Yet these instruments presume honest responding; in evaluative contexts, LLMs can instead gravitate toward socially preferred answers—a form of socially desirable responding (SDR)—biasing questionnaire-derived scores and downstream conclusions. We propose a psychometric framework to quantify and mitigate SDR in questionnaire-based evaluation of LLMs. To quantify SDR, the same inventory is administered under HONEST versus FAKE-GOOD instructions, and SDR is computed as a direction-corrected standardized effect size from item response theory (IRT)-estimated latent scores. This enables comparisons across constructs and response formats, as well as against human instructed-faking benchmarks. For mitigation, we construct a graded forced-choice (GFC) Big Five inventory by selecting 30 cross-domain pairs from an item pool via constrained optimization to match desirability. Across nine instruction-following LLMs evaluated on synthetic personas with known target profiles, Likert-style questionnaires show consistently large SDR, whereas desirability-matched GFC substantially attenuates SDR while largely preserving the recovery of the intended persona profiles. These results highlight a model-dependent SDR–recovery trade-off and motivate SDR-aware reporting practices for questionnaire-based benchmarking and auditing of LLMs.

Abstract:
Intelligent education systems often collect exam sheets as in-the-wild photos. These photos often suffer from distortions and noise caused by handwriting and occlusions, collectively referred to as Real-World Degraded Exam Images (RDEI). Structure-preserving reconstruction is key to converting RDEI into structured assets for downstream educational applications. Existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often fail under RDEI, leading to disrupted structure and evidence-unsupported hallucinations. To tackle these challenges, we propose MessToClean, a backbone-agnostic, evidence-driven pipeline that treats off-the-shelf MLLMs as interchangeable components. By grounding extraction in pixel-aligned evidence and enforcing post-hoc consistency auditing on recovered structures, MessToClean mitigates unsupported hallucinations and enhances both controllability and structural fidelity in question-level reconstruction. We curate RDEI-Exam from our educational platforms and evaluate across 12 state-of-the-art MLLM backbones. Across these, MessToClean improves stem consistency by 1.01-3.18%, figure consistency by 0.50-49.16%, and refusal F1 by 1.06-10.88% across question types.

Abstract:
We propose SemCSE-Multi, a novel unsupervised framework for generating multifaceted embeddings of scientific abstracts, evaluated in the domains of invasion biology and medicine. These embeddings capture distinct, individually specifiable aspects in isolation, thus enabling fine-grained and controllable similarity assessments as well as adaptive, user-driven visualizations of scientific domains. Our approach relies on an unsupervised procedure that produces aspect-specific summarizing sentences and trains embedding models to map semantically related summaries to nearby positions in the embedding space. We then distill these aspect-specific embedding capabilities into a unified embedding model that directly predicts multiple aspect embeddings from a scientific abstract in a single, efficient forward pass. In addition, we introduce an embedding decoding pipeline that decodes embeddings back into natural language descriptions of their associated aspects. Notably, we show that this decoding remains effective even for unoccupied regions in low-dimensional visualizations, thus offering vastly improved interpretability in user-centric settings.

Abstract:
Social media text data are often used to train Machine Learning (ML) models to identify users exhibiting high-risk mental health behaviors. However, sharing this sensitive data poses privacy risks and limits the growth of benchmark datasets. We comprehensively evaluate whether privacy-preserving ML techniques can enable safer data sharing while preserving performance. Specifically, we apply federatedlearning (FL) and Differentially Private FL for two widely-studied mental health prediction tasks: depression detection on X (Twitter) and suicide crisis detection on Reddit. We simulate realistic data-sharing scenarios by treating each user as a client in a non-IID setting, evaluating across different client fractions, aggregation strategies, and privacy budgets. While FL achieves comparable performance to centralized training (centralized 𝐹 1 = 85.63; best FL model 𝐹 1 = 83.16) on depression identification, we find that Differentially Private FL has a large performance-privacy trade-off (up to 𝐹 1 = 27.01 drop) even with low levels of noise (𝜖 = 50). This is due to the distortion of highly informative yet sparse mental health linguistic markers related to mental health, like health topics and emotion words. This research empirically demonstrates the potential and limitations of current privacy preservation techniques for mental health inference tasks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in finance, where unsafe behavior can lead to serious regulatory risks. However, most red-teaming research focuses on overtly harmful content and overlooks attacks that appear legitimate on the surface yet induce regulatory-violating responses. We address this gap by introducing a controllable black-box multi-turn risk-concealed redteaming framework (CoRT) that progressively conceals surface-level risk while exploiting regulatory-violating behaviors. CoRT contains two key components: (i) a Risk Concealment Attacker (RCA) that generates multiturn prompts via iterative refinement, and (ii) a Risk Concealment Controller (RCC) that predicts a turn-level Risk Concealment Score (RCS) to steer RCA’s follow-up style. We also build a domain-specific benchmark, FinRisk-Bench, with 522 instructions spanning six financial risk categories. Experiments on nine widely used LLMs show that CoRT (RCA) achieves 93.19% average attack success rate (ASR), and CoRT (RCA+RCC) further improves the average ASR to 95.00%. Our code and FinRisk-Bench are available at https://github.com/gcheng128/CoRT.

Abstract:
Team roles offer an interpretable lens on collaboration, yet computational studies of roles often rely on domain-specific personas or data-driven clustering rather than theory-grounded taxonomies. We operationalize a taxonomy of eight communication roles grounded in education literature and annotate a corpus of 6,307 Slack messages from 55 students across 18 teams in a semester-long computer science course project. We evaluate whether LLMs can approximate expert labels, enabling scalable, taxonomy-driven role annotation. Using these role labels, we characterize role dynamics over teams’ lifecycles, finding that different roles peak at different moments and that students enact a more diverse set of roles as projects progress. To evaluate the utility of our role constructs, we use them to predict peer recognition, outperforming lexical, conversational, and LLM-prompting baselines. To assess generalizability beyond the educational context, we apply the same role constructs to a public dataset (DeliData) to predict team performance improvement after deliberation, again exceeding prior performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) and emerging agentic frameworks are beginning to influence single-cell biology by enabling natural-language interfaces, generative annotation, and multimodal data integration. However, progress remains fragmented across data modalities, model families, and evaluation practices. LLM4Cell presents a unified survey of 58 foundation and agentic models developed for single-cell research, spanning RNA, ATAC, multi-omic, and spatial modalities. We organize these methods into five families foundation, text-bridge, spatial/multimodal, epigenomic, and agentic and map them to eight key analytical tasks, including annotation, trajectory inference, perturbation modeling, and drug-response prediction. Drawing on over 40 public datasets, we analyze benchmark coverage, data diversity, and ethical or scalability constraints, and synthesize reported capabilities across ten domain-level dimensions related to biological grounding, multimodal alignment, fairness, privacy, and interpretability. By explicitly linking datasets, modeling paradigms, and evaluation domains, LLM4Cell provides an integrated perspective on language-driven single-cell analysis and highlights open challenges in standardization, interpretability, and trustworthy model development.

Abstract:
Production LLM systems often rely on separate models for safety and other classification-heavy steps, increasing latency, VRAM footprint, and operational complexity. We instead reuse computation already paid for by the serving LLM: we train lightweight probes on its hidden states and predict labels in the same forward pass used for generation. We frame classification as representation selection over the full token × layer hidden-state tensor, rather than committing to a fixed token or fixed layer (e.g., first-token logits or final-layer pooling). To implement this, we introduce a two-stage aggregator that (i) summarizes tokens within each layer and (ii) aggregates across layer summaries to form a single representation for classification. We instantiate this template with direct pooling, a 100K-parameter scoring-attention gate, and a downcast multi-head self-attention (MHA) probe with up to 35M trainable parameters. Across safety and sentiment benchmarks our probes improve over logit-only reuse (e.g., MULI) and are competitive with substantially larger task-specific baselines, while preserving near-serving latency and avoiding the VRAM and latency costs of a separate guard-model pipeline. Multi-backbone experiments on dense and mixture-of-experts architectures (Llama-3.2-3B, GPT-OSS-20B, Qwen3-30B-A3B) confirm that these findings generalize beyond a single model family.

Abstract:
We introduce a voice-agentic framework that learns one critical omni-understanding skill: knowing when to trust itself versus when to consult external audio perception. Our work is motivated by a crucial yet counterintuitive finding: naively fine-tuning an omni-model on both speech recognition and external sound understanding tasks often degrades performance, as the model can be easily misled by noisy hypotheses. To address this, our framework, Speech-Hands, recasts the problem as an explicit self-reflection decision. This learnable reflection primitive proves effective in preventing the model from being derailed by flawed external candidates. We show that this agentic action mechanism generalizes naturally from speech recognition to complex, multiple-choice audio reasoning. Across the OpenASR leaderboard, which includes seven domain-diverse speech datasets, Speech-Hands consistently outperforms strong baselines by 12.1% WER on the OpenASR benchmark. The model also achieves 77.37% accuracy and high F1 on audio QA decisions, showing robust generalization and reliability across diverse audio question answering datasets. By unifying perception and decision-making, our work offers a practical path toward more reliable and resilient audio intelligence.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become essential for eliciting complex reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the substantial memory overhead of storing Key-Value (KV) caches during long-horizon rollouts acts as a critical bottleneck, often prohibiting efficient training on limited hardware. While existing KV compression techniques offer a remedy for inference, directly applying them to RL training induces a severe policy mismatch, leading to catastrophic performance collapse. To address this, we introduce Sparse-RL, which empowers stable RL training under sparse rollouts. We show that instability arises from a fundamental policy mismatch among the dense old policy, the sparse sampler policy, and the learner policy. To mitigate this issue, Sparse-RL incorporates Sparsity-Aware Rejection Sampling and Importance-based Reweighting to correct the off-policy bias introduced by compression-induced information loss. Experimental results show that Sparse-RL reduces rollout overhead compared to dense baselines while preserving the performance. Furthermore, Sparse-RL inherently implements sparsity-aware training, significantly enhancing model robustness during sparse inference deployment.

Abstract:
Current large language models (LLMs) often exhibit performance imbalances between dominant languages (e.g., English) and non-dominant ones due to the skewed distribution of pretraining data. A common strategy to address this issue is to enhance cross-lingual alignment, thereby facilitating non-dominant language processing. However, existing methods typically rely on additional training objectives or language-specific parameters, which increase training complexity and cost. In this work, we propose a selective bidirectional language projection framework that enables efficient multilingual alignment and language shift using the intrinsic parameters. Specifically, we first identify the layers most sensitive to language projection between non-dominant and dominant languages through neuron activation analysis. We then perform sequential language projection within the selected layers by mapping non-dominant representations into the dominant language space and reverting them before generation. The bidirectional projection benefits the subsequent instruction tuning in non-dominant languages. Experiments on seven benchmarks demonstrate that our method remarkably enhances the performance of non-dominant languages. Further analyses indicate that our method learns better internal representations and exhibits strong generalization capabilities.

Abstract:
Recent image generation and editing models demonstrate robust adherence to instructions and high visual quality on academic benchmarks.However, their performance on paid, real-world design projects remains uncertain. We introduce ServImage , a benchmark that explicitly correlates model outputs with economic value in commercial design projects. ServImage consists of (i) ServImageBench : a dataset of 1.07k paid commercial design tasks and 2.05k designer deliverables totaling over 295k, covering portrait, product, and digital content, along with 33k candidate images and 33k human annotations.(ii) ServImageScore : an integrated scoring system that combines three quality dimensions: baseline requirements fulfilment, visual execution quality, and commercial necessity satisfaction. These three dimensions are designed to characterize the factors that drive human payment decisions and indicate whether an image is commercially acceptable.(iii) ServImageModel : under this scoring system, we propose a payment prediction model trained on the human-annotated candidate images, achieving 82.00% accuracy in predicting human payment decisions and producing calibrated payment probabilities.ServImage provides a comprehensive foundation for assessing the commercial viability of image generation models and offers a scalable resource for future research on economically grounded vision systems Github.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents depend on effective tool-use policies to solve complex tasks, yet optimizing these policies remains challenging dueto delayed supervision and the difficulty ofcredit assignment in long-horizon trajectories.Existing optimization approaches tend to beeither monolithic, which are prone to entangling behaviors, or single-aspect, which ignorecross-module error propagation. To addressthese limitations, we propose EVOTOOL, a self-evolving framework that optimizes a modulartool-use policy via a gradient-free evolutionary paradigm. EVOTOOL decomposes agent’stool-use policy into four modules, includingPlanner, Selector, Caller, and Synthesizer, anditeratively improves them through three mechanisms. Trajectory-Grounded Blame Attribution uses diagnostic traces to localize failuresto a specific module. Feedback-Guided Targeted Mutation then edits only that modulevia natural-language critique. Diversity-AwarePopulation Selection preserves complementarycandidates to ensure solution diversity. Acrossfour diverse benchmarks, EVOTOOL outperforms strong baselines by over 5 points on bothGPT-4.1 and Qwen3-8B, while achieving superior efficiency and transferability.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged with remarkable capabilities in complex tasks through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, practical resource constraints have sparked interest in transferring these abilities to smaller models. However, achieving both domain performance and cross-domain generalization remains challenging. Existing approaches typically restrict students to following a single golden rationale and treat different reasoning paths independently. Due to distinct inductive biases and intrinsic preferences, alongside the student’s evolving capacity and reasoning preferences during training, a teacher’s "optimal" rationale could act as out-of-distribution noise. This misalignment leads to a degeneration of the student’s latent reasoning distribution, causing suboptimal performance. To bridge this gap, we propose MIND, a capability-adaptive framework that transitions distillation from passive mimicry to active cognitive construction. We synthesize diverse teacher perspectives through a novel "Teaching Assistant" network. By employing a novel Feedback-Driven Inertia Calibration mechanism, this network utilizes inertia-filtered training loss to align supervision with the student’s current adaptability, effectively enhancing performance while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MIND achieves state-of-the-art performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution benchmarks, and our sophisticated latent space analysis further confirms the mechanism of reasoning ability internalization.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are introducing a paradigm shift in molecular discovery by enabling text-guided interaction with chemical spaces through natural language and symbolic notations, with emerging extensions to incorporate multi-modal inputs. To advance this emerging field, this survey provides an up-to-date and forward-looking review of the emerging use of LLMs for two central tasks: molecule generation and molecule optimization. We organize our survey around four fundamental challenges that have emerged as critical evaluation dimensions in recent studies: ensuring validity, enhancing synthesizability, achieving precise property control, and maximizing diversity. Based on this, we systematically analyze how current LLM learning paradigms are applied to tackle each challenge, revealing the distinct capabilities and inherent limitations of each approach. In addition, we include the commonly used datasets and evaluation protocols aligned with these challenges. We conclude by discussing future directions, positioning this survey as a resource for researchers working at the intersection of LLMs and molecular science. A continuously updated reading list is available at https://github.com/REAL-Lab-NU/Awesome-LLM-Centric-Molecular-Discovery .

Abstract:
Cost-aware routing dynamically dispatches user queries to models of varying capability to balance performance and inference cost. However, the routing strategy introduces new security concern that adversaries may manipulate router to consistently select expensive high-capability models. Existing routing attacks depend either on white-box access or heuristic prompts, rendering them ineffective in real-world black-box scenarios. In this work, we propose R 2 A, which aims to mislead black-box LLM routers to expensive models via adversarial suffix optimization. Specifically, R 2 A deploys a hybrid ensemble surrogate router to mimic the black-box router. A suffix optimization algorithm is further adapted for the ensemble-based surrogate. Extensive experiments on multiple open-source and commercial routing systems demonstrate that R 2 A significantly increases the routing rate to expensive models on queries of different distributions. Code and examples: https://github.com/thcxiker/R2A-Attack.

Abstract:
Despite rapid progress, Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) remain unreliable due to hallucinations, which are outputs that contradict either video evidence (faithfulness) or verifiable world knowledge (factuality).Existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of factuality hallucinations and predominantly evaluate models only in clean settings.We introduce INFACT, a diagnostic benchmark comprising 9,800 QA instances with fine-grained taxonomies for faithfulness and factuality, spanning real and synthetic videos.INFACT evaluates models in four modes: Base (clean), Visual Degradation, Evidence Corruption, and Temporal Intervention for order-sensitive items.Reliability under induced modes is quantified using Resist Rate (RR) and Temporal Sensitivity Score (TSS).Experiments on 14 representative Video-LLMs reveal that higher Base-mode accuracy does not reliably translate to higher reliability in the induced modes, with evidence corruption reducing stability and temporal intervention yielding the largest degradation.Notably, many open-source baselines exhibit near-zero TSS on factuality, indicating pronounced temporal inertia on order-sensitive questions.

Abstract:
Existing text-guided image editing methods primarily rely on end-to-end pixel-level inpainting paradigm. Despite its success in simple scenarios, this paradigm still significantly struggles with compositional editing tasks that require precise local control and complex multi-object spatial reasoning. This paradigm is severely limited by 1) the implicit coupling of planning and execution, 2) the lack of object-level control granularity, and 3) the reliance on unstructured, pixel-centric modeling. To address these limitations, we propose I2E, a novel "Decompose-then-Action” paradigm that revisits image editing as an actionable interaction process within a structured environment. I2E utilizes a Decomposer to transform unstructured images into discrete, manipulable object layers and then introduces a physics-aware Vision-Language-Action Agent to parse complex instructions into a series of atomic actions via Chain-of-Thought reasoning. Further, we also construct I2E-Bench, a benchmark designed for multi-instance spatial reasoning and high-precision editing. Experimental results on I2E-Bench and multiple public benchmarks demonstrate that I2E significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in handling complex compositional instructions, maintaining physical plausibility, and ensuring multi-turn editing stability.

Abstract:
Political user-level stance detection is vital for analyzing polarization, yet progress is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality benchmarks integrating linguistic and social signals. Existing datasets, largely relying on noisy heuristic or distant supervision, limit model robustness and generalizability. To address this, we introduce TwiUSD, a large-scale, expert-annotated benchmark for political user-level stance detection with explicit social network structure. TwiUSD comprises 16,211 users and 47,757 tweets, labeled by domain experts using a protocol that integrates both user content and followee signals, ensuring high-quality annotations (kappa > 0.9). Building upon TwiUSD, we propose MRFG, a Multi-scale Relevance Filtering and Graph-aware framework that leverages large language models to filter stance-relevant followee content and adaptively routes features based on structural informativeness. This design enables robust stance prediction by jointly modeling semantic and relational cues. Extensive experiments show that MRFG significantly outperforms strong baselines, highlighting the importance of relevance filtering and structure-aware modeling.

Abstract:
Despite the recent progress made in cross-prompt essay scoring, there is little analysis of what makes a state-of-the-art cross-prompt scorer work well. To this end, we present an empirical analysis of how the key components of a cross-prompt scorer interact with each other and impact its overall performance. In addition, we examine for the first time the application of transductive learning to cross-prompt scoring, which represents an important starting point for providing a practical way to improve cross-prompt scorers for use in the rarely-studied classroom setting without the need for additional labeled training data.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have attracted much attention due to their exceptional performance. However, their performance mainly stems from thinking, a long Chain of Thought (CoT), which significantly increase computational overhead. To address this overthinking problem, existing work focuses on using reinforcement learning (RL) to train hybrid reasoning models that automatically decide whether to engage in thinking or not based on the complexity of the query. Unfortunately, using RL will suffer the the reward hacking problem, e.g., the model engages in thinking but is judged as not doing so, resulting in incorrect rewards.To mitigate this problem, existing works either employ supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which incurs high computational costs, or enforce uniform token limits on non-thinking responses, which yields limited mitigation of the problem.In this paper, we propose Thinking-Based Non-Thinking (TNT). It does not employ SFT, and sets different maximum token usage for responses not using thinking across various queries by leveraging information from the solution component of the responses using thinking. Experiments on five mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that TNT reduces token usage by around 50% compared to DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B/7B and DeepScaleR-1.5B, while significantly improving accuracy. In fact, TNT achieves the optimal trade-off between accuracy and efficiency among all tested methods. Additionally, the probability of reward hacking problem in TNT’s responses, which are classified as not using thinking, remains below 10% across all tested datasets.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as long-term interactive agents, yet their limited context windows make it difficult to sustain coherent behavior over extended interactions. Existing memory systems for LLMs often store isolated records and retrieve fragments, limiting their ability to consolidate evolving experience and resolve conflicts. We introduce EverMemOS, a self-organizing memory operating system that implements an engram-inspired lifecycle for computational memory. First, Episodic Trace Formation converts dialogue streams into MemCells that capture episodic traces, atomic facts, and time-bounded foresight. Second, Semantic Consolidation organizes MemCells into thematic MemScenes, distilling stable semantic structures and updating user profiles. Finally, Reconstructive Recollection performs MemScene-guided agentic retrieval to compose the necessary and sufficient context for downstream reasoning. Experiments on LoCoMo, LongMemEval, and PersonaMem-v2 show that EverMemOS significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on memory-augmented reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Understanding language acquisition in language models remains an open question, yet many benchmarks focus on grammatical acceptability, with far less attention to interpreting meanings conveyed by grammatical forms.We introduce the Linguistic Minimal-Pair Benchmark for Evaluating Constructional Understanding in Language Models (CxMP), grounded in Construction Grammar, which treats form–meaning pairings (constructions) as fundamental linguistic units.It evaluates whether models interpret the semantic information implied by constructions, using a controlled minimal-pairs across nine types.Our results show that constructional understanding develops more gradually and remains limited for some constructions even in large language models (LLMs), whereas performance on grammatical acceptability emerges earlier, with shallow heuristics in CxMP exhibiting a U-shaped pattern.These findings highlight the need to broaden existing linguistic evaluations to capture meanings encoded in linguistic form.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in knowledge-intensive applications but often generate factually incorrect responses. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is correcting LLMs using feedback. Therefore, in this paper, we introduce FactCorrector, a new post-hoc correction method that adapts across domains without retraining and leverages structured feedback about the factuality of the original response to generate a correction. To support rigorous evaluations of factuality correction methods, we also develop the VELI5 benchmark, a novel dataset containing systematically injected factual errors and ground-truth corrections. Experiments on VELI5 and several popular long-form factuality datasets show that the FactCorrector approach significantly improves factual precision while preserving relevance, outperforming strong baselines. We release our code at https://ibm.biz/factcorrector.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SD) has proven to be an effective technique for accelerating autoregressive generation in large language models (LLMs), however its application to vision-language models (VLMs) remains relatively unexplored. We propose DREAM-S, a novel SD framework designed specifically for fast and efficient decoding in VLMs. DREAM-S leverages a neural architecture search (NAS) framework with target-aware supernet training to automatically identify both the optimal interaction strategy between the draft and target models, and the most suitable draft model architecture for the underlying hardware implementation platform. DREAM-S additionally incorporates adaptive intermediate feature distillation, guided by attention entropy, to enable efficient draft training. Experiments on a range of well-established VLMs show that DREAM-S achieves up to a 3.85 × speedup compared to standard decoding approaches and significantly outperforms existing SD baselines.

Abstract:
Reasoning-enhanced large language models rely on intermediate reasoning signals to solve complex, multi-step tasks, making reasoning behavior a valuable form of intellectual property. Meanwhile, knowledge distillation enables an adversary to replicate this behavior in a realistic black-box setting by repeatedly querying a deployed model on a target domain and training a local student to imitate its outputs, including reasoning traces. Existing LLM watermarks primarily operate on surface text and decoding-time token biases, and thus fail to provide reliable attribution of reasoning behavior once it is transferred through knowledge distillation. ReasMark entangles the watermark with the target-domain input distribution by selecting watermark tokens from high-frequency prompts, so distillation queries naturally activate it. It then embeds the watermark by score-conditioned losses that create a detectable reasoning-length gap for black-box verification. Comprehensive experiments across multiple LLMs, datasets, and distillation settings demonstrate that ReasMark consistently outperforms existing baselines while preserving task utility.

Abstract:
Agentic benchmarks increasingly rely on LLM-simulated users to scalably evaluate agent performance, yet the robustness, validity, and fairness of this approach remain unexamined. Through a user study with participants across the United States, India, Kenya, and Nigeria, we investigate whether LLM-simulated users serve as reliable proxies for real human users in evaluating agents on τ-Bench retail tasks. We find that user simulators lack robustness, with agent success rates varying up to 9 percentage points across different user LLMs. Furthermore, simulated users systematically miscalibrate performance, underestimating success on challenging tasks while overestimating moderately difficult ones. African American Vernacular English (AAVE) speakers experience consistently worse success rates and calibration errors than Standard American English (SAE) speakers, with disparities compounding significantly with age. We also find simulated users to be a differentially effective proxy for different populations, performing worst for AAVE and Indian English. Additionally, simulated users introduce conversational artifacts and surface different failure patterns than human users. These findings demonstrate that current evaluation practices risk misrepresenting agent capabilities across diverse user populations and may obscure real-world deployment challenges.

Abstract:
A standard method for evaluating grammatical error correction systems severely underestimates performance, as it compares outputsagainst a small, fixed set of human references, despite the large space of possible valid corrections. Prior research has shown that using aclosest-gold reference – i.e., a human reference generated with respect to the system output rather than the original text – yields more accurate performance estimates. Yet, producing such references for each system individually is costly. We introduce an automated method for generating closest-gold references by prompting a large language model (LLM) with system outputs. We find that performance scores computed using automatic closest-gold references correlate well with human closest-golds, whereas standard reference-based evaluations show weak or no correlation.Building on this insight, we use both fixed human references and closest-gold references generated by Claude and Llama to compare theperformance of supervised models and GPT-4 across 14 benchmarks spanning 12 languages. Consequently, while prior work has shown that GPT-4 appears to lag behind traditional models, we demonstrate that this is due to the failures of the standard evaluation method that systematically underestimates GPT-4 performance more severely than that of supervised models. We show that a more appropriate evaluation approach, based on the closest gold method, reveals that GPT-4 outperforms traditional state-of- the-art models on almost all languages.

Abstract:
Understanding how large language models (LLMs) store, retain, and remove knowledge is critical for interpretability, reliability, and privacy compliance. We reveal a key phenomenon: machine unlearning imprints distinct geometric signatures in the model’s input loss landscape (ILL), with unlearned examples forming flat, low-curvature plateaus that contrast sharply with the high-curvature basins of retained or unseen examples. Remarkably, these patterns emerge even when pointwise losses overlap, exposing residual memorization through input-output behavior alone. Building on this insight, we introduce REMIND (Residual Memorization in Neighborhood Dynamics), a framework that diagnoses memorization states (retained, forgotten, holdout) by probing local ILL curvature over semantically coherent neighborhoods. REMIND operates using only loss queries and a novel embedding-proximity perturbation method to generate controlled, interpretable variants. In evaluations, REMIND achieves 82% multi-class ROC-AUC, outperforming baselines like ROUGE-L and MIN-K%++, with roughly 2× higher AUC at 1% FPR, and remains robust on paraphrased inputs. This neighborhood-level geometric analysis provides a practical, interpretable lens on LLM knowledge retention and unlearning, detecting subtle residual signals missed by pointwise or aggregated metrics.

Abstract:
Most ATP benchmarks embed the final answer within the formal statement — a convention we call "Easy Mode" — a design that simplifies the task relative to what human competitors face and may lead to optimistic estimates of model capability.We call the stricter, more realistic setting "Hard Mode": the system must independently discover the answer before constructing a formal proof.To enable Hard Mode research, we make two contributions.First, we release MiniF2F-Hard and FIMO-Hard, expert-reannotated Hard Mode variants of two widely-used ATP benchmarks.Second, we introduce Discover And Prove (DAP), an agentic framework that uses LLM natural-language reasoning with explicit self-reflection to discover answers, then rewrites Hard Mode statements into Easy Mode ones for existing ATP provers.DAP sets the state of the art: on CombiBench it raises solved problems from 7 (previous SOTA, Pass@16) to 10; on PutnamBench it is the first system to formally prove 36 theorems in Hard Mode — while simultaneously revealing that state-of-the-art LLMs exceed 80% answer accuracy on the same problems where formal provers manage under 10%, exposing a substantial gap that Hard Mode benchmarks are uniquely suited to measure.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, enabling them to tackle knowledge-intensive tasks. However, limited research has explored how LLMs effectively leverage RAG techniques for multi-hop question answering (QA), particularly when handling knowledge with with varying degrees of familiarity. In this paper, we introduce MINTQA (Multi-hop Question Answering on New and Tail Knowledge), a benchmark designed to evaluate multi-hop QA performance on questions involving 10,479 question-answer pairs for evaluating old/new knowledge and 17,887 pairs for assessing popular/unpopular knowledge, with each question equipped with corresponding sub-questions and answers. This benchmark primarily evaluates the multi-hop reasoning ability of LLMs and their capacity to handle knowledge with varying levels of familiarity during the reasoning process. We evaluate 22 state-of-the-art LLMs using three distinct QA strategies: LLM-based parameterized knowledge QA, direct RAG-enhanced QA, and multi-hop RAG-enhanced QA. Our experiments reveal key challenges in how LLMs handle knowledge with different familiarity and offer insights into improving their multi-hop reasoning capabilities when combined with RAG techniques.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently been applied to 3D vision-language (3D-VL) tasks, which require spatial reasoning to identify target objects relative to anchors. Scene graphs are commonly employed to represent such relations, but reasoning over complete graphs incurs high token costs and computational inefficiencies, motivating the need for pruning. Existing pruning methods primarily rely on spatial proximity and often remove task-relevant relations, thereby undermining reliable spatial reasoning. To address these limitations, we derive a key requirement for scene graph pruning: preserving spatial relations that are most pertinent to the specific 3D-VL task. Guided by this insight, we propose the Conceptual-Adjacent Scene Graph Pruner (CAPruner). CAPruner integrates fuzzy semantic relevance with spatial proximity to estimate the importance of relations, enabling the selection of critical relations in a task-specific context. Moreover, to avoid costly relation-level annotations, CAPruner is trained by supervising the aggregated scores of each node’s incident edges. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAPruner effectively preserves relations essential for spatial reasoning, leading to substantial performance improvements of LLMs on 3D-VL tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/fz-zsl/CAPruner.

Abstract:
Referring multimodal large language models enable users to ground queries to specific image regions via spatial prompts, supporting fine-grained referring dialogue. However, existing methods rely on extensive fine-tuning to mitigate attention distraction, which incurs high computational costs and limits adaptability. Without sufficient training data, irrelevant regions in single images easily divert model focus, leading to redundant outputs or hallucinations. To address this, we propose CoreGaze, a training-free framework that simulates human visual gaze diffusion for fine-grained comprehension. First, CoreGaze constructs a sparse semantic graph from visual tokens, modeling region-wise affinities via thresholded similarity. It then maps the user’s visual prompt to a core subgraph with amplified initial influence, which drives a degree-normalized diffusion process using restart-equipped random walks to propagate relevance to contextual neighborhoods. This process prunes irrelevant tokens while preserving user-indicated targets and semantically linked context, distilling a focused yet comprehensive subgraph. Finally, CoreGaze fuses this subgraph with prompt tokens in the frozen large language model decoder, facilitating fine-grained referring generation. Experimental results show that CoreGaze achieves outstanding performance in multiple referring dialogue tasks, showcasing its effectiveness.

Abstract:
Respiratory diseases remain a leading cause of global mortality, where timely and accurate diagnosis is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens. While prior work has explored audio-based models for respiratory disease detection, such unimodal approaches often suffer from limited generalizability and diagnostic precision. In this paper, we propose RespiraMFM, a Multimodal Foundation Model that integrates respiratory sounds with patient medical history and symptoms to enhance diagnostic accuracy and disease detection capabilities. We introduce an effective contrastive alignment strategy for audio-text multimodal integration, allowing the model to learn better cross-modal representations between respiratory sounds and corresponding textual clinical information. We evaluate RespiraMFM across five major respiratory diseases using seven real-world datasets in both supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot settings, achieving a 9.15% improvement in AUROC on supervised tasks and a 20.98% gain on zero-shot tasks over existing baselines. These findings underscore the potential of our framework to advance early diagnosis and improve clinical decision-making in respiratory disease management.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly used for question-answering (QA), relying on static, pre-annotated references for evaluation poses significant challenges in cost, scalability, and completeness. Meanwhile, using LLMs themselves as evaluators without external grounding remains unreliable for objective tasks, as they systematically over-accept incorrect answers, fabricate supporting rationales, and degrade sharply on questions that fall outside their training data. We propose Search-AuGmented Evaluation (SAGE), a framework to assess LLM outputs without fixed ground-truth answers. Unlike conventional metrics that compare to static references or depend solely on LLM-as-a-judge knowledge, SAGE acts as an agent that actively retrieves and synthesizes external evidence. It iteratively generates web queries, collects information, summarizes findings, and refines subsequent searches through reflection. By reducing dependence on static reference-driven evaluation protocols, SAGE offers a scalable and adaptive alternative for evaluating the factuality of LLMs. Experimental results on multiple free-form QA benchmarks show that SAGE achieves substantial to perfect agreement with human evaluations.

Abstract:
Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for analyzing Internet-scale image data, offering significant benefits but also raising critical safety and societal concerns. In particular, these models may be misused to extract sensitive information from personal images, such as identifying individuals or revealing locations. In this work, we propose ImageProtector, a method designed to protect images from unauthorized analysis by MLLMs. Before an image is shared online, ImageProtector embeds a carefully crafted, nearly imperceptible perturbation that acts as a visual prompt injection attack on MLLMs. Consequently, when a malicious actor downloads and queries a protected image, the MLLM is consistently misled into generating a refusal response such as "I’m sorry, I can’t help with that request." We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of ImageProtector across six MLLMs and four datasets. Additionally, we evaluate three potential countermeasures, Gaussian noise, DiffPure, and adversarial training, and show that while they partially mitigate the impact of ImageProtector, they simultaneously degrade model accuracy and/or efficiency.

Abstract:
Generative large language models (LLMs) are now used extensively for text classification in computational social science (CSS). In this work, we focus on the steps before and after LLM prompting: conceptualization of the categories to classify and using LLM predictions in downstream statistical inference. We argue these steps have been overlooked in much of LLM-era CSS and LLMs can tempt analysts to skip conceptualization altogether. For example, a political scientist classifying "protest" with LLMs may never be forced to craft a definition: unlike human annotators who would ask clarifying questions, an LLM can silently accept an underspecified concept to classify and return plausible-looking labels. Using simulations, we show that conceptualization failures induce downstream inferential bias that cannot be corrected solely by a more accurate LLM or post-hoc bias correction methods. We conclude by reminding CSS analysts that conceptualization is still a first-order concern in the LLM-era and provide concrete advice for pursuing low-cost, unbiased, low-variance downstream estimates.

Abstract:
Timely detection of depression symptoms is essential for early intervention, and the continuous stream of user-generated content on social media provides an ideal source for this purpose. To address this challenge, we propose HOPE, a Hybrid Optimized Parallel Encoding framework that combines supervised symptom relevance signals with unsupervised intrinsic semantic clustering. This parallel design enables robust symptom detection under limited labeled data and introduces a distinctive semantic-similarity perspective with automatic class-anchor adjustment. We also propose an optimized hybrid semantic fusion mechanism to combine supervised and unsupervised scores through a learnable module. We evaluate our system on multiple benchmark datasets and surpass previous approaches, demonstrating its effectiveness in detecting fine-grained symptoms and early warning of mental health risk. Source code is available at https://github.com/candleMind/hope.

Abstract:
Large language models have improved dialogue systems, but often process conversational turns in isolation, overlooking the event structures that guide natural interactions. Hence we introduce EventWeave, a framework that explicitly models relationships between conversational events to generate more contextually appropriate dialogue responses. EventWeave constructs a dynamic event graph that distinguishes between core events (main goals) and supporting events (interconnected details), employing a multi-head attention mechanism to selectively determine which events are most relevant to the current turn. Unlike summarization or standard graph-based approaches, our method captures three distinct relationship types between events, allowing for more nuanced context modeling. Experiments on three dialogue datasets demonstrate that EventWeave produces more natural and contextually appropriate responses while requiring less computational overhead than models processing the entire dialogue history. Ablation studies confirm improvements stem from better event relationship modeling rather than increased information density. Our approach effectively balances comprehensive context understanding with generating concise responses, maintaining strong performance across various dialogue lengths through targeted optimization techniques.

Abstract:
The data mixture used in the pre-training of a language model is a cornerstone of its final performance. Static data mixing strategies in Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training are often suboptimal as they fail to adapt to the model’s evolving learning states. Conversely, fully online dynamic updates, while adaptive, incur prohibitive computational costs. To bridge this gap, we propose TiKMiX, an efficient semi-dynamic data mixing framework. Our approach is grounded in a key observation of influence ranking invariance: the relative importance of data domains exhibits strong temporal stability over long training intervals. Leveraging this insight, we propose Group Influence, an efficient approach for quantifying domain impact, and formulate data mixing as a periodic, low-overhead influence maximization problem. Compared with REGMIX, the proposed method reduces computational overhead by 80% and achieves an average performance gain of 2% across nine downstream benchmarks, thereby effectively mitigating data under-digestion.

Abstract:
Explainability for Large Language Model (LLM) agents is especially challenging in interactive, partially observable settings, where decisions depend on evolving beliefs and other agents. We present TriEx, a tri-view explainability framework that instruments sequential decision making with aligned artifacts: (i) structured first-person self-reasoning bound to an action, (ii) explicit second-person belief states about opponents updated over time, and (iii) third-person oracle audits grounded in environment-derived reference signals. This design turns explanations from free-form narratives into evidence-anchored objects that can be compared and checked across time and perspectives. Using imperfect-information strategic games as a controlled testbed, we show that TriEx enables scalable analysis of explanation faithfulness, belief dynamics, and evaluator reliability, revealing systematic mismatches between what agents say, what they believe, and what they do. Our results highlight explainability as an interaction-dependent property and motivate multi-view, evidence-grounded evaluation for LLM agents.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer from hallucinations, severely undermining their reliability. While white-box hallucination detection methods that leverage hidden states prevail, they fail to identify and focus on fact-critical information when analyzing token sequences. To address this, we propose LAFaCT, a Localize-then-Analyze detection framework. It first localizes fact-critical tokens using Factual Criticality, a novel metric derived from feature attribution. A subsequent stage then performs a focused sequential analysis on their hidden states. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks and multiple model families confirm LAFaCT as the new state-of-the-art, with in-depth analyses validating the effectiveness of its core token-localization strategy.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) based autonomous agents demonstrate multifaceted capabilities to contribute substantially to economic production. However, existing benchmarks remain focused on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. Moreover, the reliance on human-in-the-loop feedback for realistic tasks creates a scalability bottleneck, hindering automated rollout collection and evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce AgencyBench, a comprehensive benchmark derived from daily AI usage, evaluating 6 core agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios, comprising 138 tasks with specific queries, deliverables, and rubrics. These scenarios require an average of 90 tool calls, 1 million tokens, and hours of execution time to resolve. To enable automated evaluation, we employ a user simulation agent to provide iterative feedback, and a Docker sandbox to conduct visual and functional rubric-based assessment. Experiments reveal that closed-source models significantly outperform open-source models (48.4% vs 32.1%). Further analysis reveals significant disparities across models in resource efficiency, feedback-driven self-correction, and specific tool-use preferences.

Abstract:
Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers. In this paper, we study automatic generation of such tables from a pool of papers to satisfy a user’s information need. Building on recent work (Newman et al., 2024), we move beyond oracle settings by (i) simulating well-specified yet schema-agnostic user demands that avoid leaking gold column names or values, (ii) explicitly modeling retrieval noise via semantically related but out-of-scope distractor papers verified by human annotators, and (iii) introducing a lightweight, annotation-free, utilization-oriented evaluation that decomposes utility (schema coverage, unary cell fidelity, pairwise relational consistency) and measures paper selection via a two-way QA procedure (gold→system and system→gold) with recall, precision, and F1. To support reproducible evaluation, we introduce arXiv2Table, a benchmark of 1,957 tables referencing 7,158 papers, with human-verified distractors and rewritten, schema-agnostic user demands. We also develop an iterative, batch-based generation method that co-refines paper filtering and schema over multiple rounds. We validate the evaluation protocol with human audits and cross-evaluator checks. Extensive experiments show that our method consistently improves over strong baselines, while absolute scores remain modest, underscoring the task’s difficulty. Our data and code is available at https://github.com/JHU-CLSP/arXiv2Table.

Abstract:
More than half of the global population struggles to meet their civil justice needs due to limited legal resources. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, significant challenges remain even at the foundational step of legal issue identification. To investigate LLMs’ capabilities in this task, we constructed a dataset from 769 real-world Malaysian Contract Act court cases, using GPT-4o to extract facts and generate candidate legal issues, annotated by senior legal experts, which reveals a critical limitation: while LLMs generate diverse issue candidates, their precision remains inadequate (GPT-4o achieves only 62%). To address this gap, we propose LePREC (Legal Professional-inspired Reasoning Elicitation and Classification), a neuro-symbolic framework combining neural generation with structured statistical reasoning. LePREC consists of: (1) a neuro component leverages LLMs to transform legal descriptions into question-answer pairs representing diverse analytical factors, and (2) a symbolic component applies sparse linear models over these discrete features, learning explicit algebraic weights that identify the most informative reasoning factors. Unlike end-to-end neural approaches, LePREC achieves interpretability through transparent feature weighting while maintaining data efficiency through correlation-based statistical classification. Experiments show a 30-40% improvement over advanced LLM baselines, including GPT-4o and Claude, confirming that correlation-based factor-issue analysis offers a more data-efficient solution for relevance decisions.

Abstract:
Recent large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities. However, a critical question remains: do these models possess genuine strategic reasoning, or do they primarily excel at pattern recognition? To address this, we present ChessArena, a chess-based testbed for evaluating LLMs. Chess demands strategic reasoning, precise rule adherence, and the ability to track complex game states. ChessArena is a competitive framework where LLMs play against each other under four play modes. We evaluate 13 LLMs across over 800 games, testing basic understanding, move selection, and puzzle solving. Results reveal significant shortcomings: no model beats Maia-1100 (human amateur level), and some lose to random play. We also present a strong baseline: our fine-tuned Qwen3-8B substantially improves performance, approaching much larger state-of-the-art reasoning models.

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) trained from human preferences are central to aligning large language models, yet they often break under distribution shift or targeted perturbations. Existing failure discovery methods rely on prior knowledge of preference attributes and therefore do not scale to new models or data. We introduce a preference distribution agnostic procedure that uses the reward model itself to guide controlled decoding toward mis specified responses while preserving the underlying preference class. Building on this discovery mechanism, we propose REFORM, a self improving RM framework that (i) searches for class consistent but reward inconsistent variants and (ii) fine tunes the RM on a small, targeted augmentation of these failures. On Anthropic Helpful Harmless and PKU Beavertails, REFORM consistently improves robustness without degrading in distribution reward quality across different models (e.g., Mistral-7B and Qwen-14B), with an average improvement of 35%–45%.Further, across Best of N sampling, PPO, and DPO, REFORM preserves downstream generation quality and reduces spurious correlations. Our results show that RMs can serve as their own adversary to expose and fix blind spots, yielding robust alignment without manual attribute priors or large scale relabeling.

Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to attribute mental states to others, is a hallmark of social intelligence. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate promising performance on standard ToM benchmarks, we observe that they often fail to generalize to complex task-specific scenarios, relying heavily on prompt scaffolding to mimic reasoning. The critical misalignment between the internal knowledge and external behavior raises a fundamental question: Do LLMs truly possess intrinsic cognition, and can they externalize this internal knowledge into stable, high-quality behaviors? To answer this, we introduce CoSToM (Causal-oriented Steering for ToM alignment), a framework that transitions from mechanistic interpretation to active intervention. First, we employ causal tracing to map the internal distribution of ToM features, empirically uncovering the internal layers’ characteristics in encoding fundamental ToM semantics. Building on this insight, we implement a lightweight alignment framework via targeted activation steering within these ToM-critical layers. Experiments demonstrate that CoSToM significantly enhances human-like social reasoning capabilities and downstream dialogue quality.

Abstract:
Coreference Resolution (CR) is a fundamental NLP task critical for long-form tasks as information extraction, summarization, and many business applications. However, CR methods originally designed for English struggle with Morphologically Rich Languages (MRLs), where mention boundaries do not necessarily align with word boundaries, and a single token may consist of multiple anaphors. CR modeling and evaluation protocols standardly assume that, as in English, words and mentions mostly align. However, this assumption breaks down in MRLs, particularly in the context of LLMs’ raw-text processing and end-to-end tasks. To assess and address this challenge, we introduce KibutzR, the first comprehensive CR dataset for Modern Hebrew, an MRL rich with complex words and pronominal clitics. We deliver an annotated dataset that identifies mentions at word, sub-word and multi-word levels, and propose an evaluation protocol that directly addresses word/morpheme boundary discrepancies. Our experiments show that contemporary LLMs perform significantly worse on Hebrew than on English, and that performance degrades on raw unsegmented text. Crucially, we show an inverse performance-trend in Hebrew relative to English, where smaller encoders perform far better than contemporary decoder models, leaving ample space for investigation and improvement. We deliver a new benchmark for Hebrew coreference resolution and a segmentation-aware evaluation protocol to inform future work on other MRLs.

Abstract:
While multimodal large language models have demonstrated impressive short-term reasoning, they struggle with long-horizon video understanding due to limited context windows and static memory mechanisms that fail to mirror human cognitive efficiency. Existing paradigms typically fall into two extremes: vision-centric methods that incur high latency and redundancy through dense visual accumulation, or text-centric approaches that suffer from detail loss and hallucination via aggressive captioning. To bridge this gap, we propose MM-Mem, a pyramidal multimodal memory architecture grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory. MM-Mem structures memory hierarchically into a Sensory Buffer, Episodic Stream, and Symbolic Schema, enabling the progressive distillation of fine-grained perceptual traces (verbatim) into high-level semantic schemas (gist).Furthermore, to govern the dynamic construction of memory, we derive a Semantic Information Bottleneck objective and introduce SIB-GRPO to optimize the trade-off between memory compression and task-relevant information retention.In inference, we design an entropy-driven top-down memory retrieval strategy.Extensive experiments across 4 benchmarks confirm that MM-Mem achieves state-of-the-art performance on both offline and streaming tasks, demonstrating robust generalization and validating the effectiveness of cognition-inspired memory organization.Code and associated configurations are publicly available at ‘https://github.com/EliSpectre/MM-Mem‘.

Abstract:
Web applications (web apps) have become a key arena for large language models (LLMs) to demonstrate their code generation capabilities and commercial potential. However, building a benchmark for LLM-generated web apps remains challenging due to the need for real-world user requirements, generalizable evaluation metrics without relying on ground-truth implementations or test cases, and interpretable evaluation results. To address these challenges, we introduce WebCoderBench, the first real-world-collected, generalizable, and interpretable benchmark for web app generation. WebCoderBench comprises 1,572 user requirements, covering diverse modalities and expression styles that reflect realistic user intentions. WebCoderBench provides 24 fine-grained evaluation metrics across 9 perspectives, combining the rule-based and LLM-as-a-judge paradigms for fully automated, objective, and general evaluation. Moreover, WebCoderBench adopts human-preference-aligned weights over metrics to yield interpretable overall scores. Experiments across 12 representative LLMs and 2 LLM-based agents show that there exists no dominant model across all evaluation metrics, offering an opportunity for LLM developers to optimize their models in a targeted manner for a more powerful version.

Abstract:
India’s linguistic landscape, spanning 22 scheduled languages and hundreds of marginalized dialects, has driven rapid growth in NLP datasets, benchmarks, and pretrained models. However, no dedicated survey consolidates resources developed specifically for Indian languages. Existing reviews either focus on a few high-resource languages or subsume Indian languages within broader multilingual settings, limiting coverage of low-resource and culturally diverse varieties. To address this gap, we present the first unified survey of Indian NLP resources, covering 200+ datasets, 50+ benchmarks, and 100+ models, tools, and systems across text, speech, multimodal, and culturally grounded tasks. We organize resources by linguistic phenomena, domains, and modalities; analyze trends in annotation, evaluation, and model design; and identify persistent challenges such as data sparsity, uneven language coverage, script diversity, and limited cultural and domain generalization. This survey offers a consolidated foundation for equitable, culturally grounded, and scalable NLP research in the Indian linguistic ecosystem.

Abstract:
Table Question Answering (TableQA) benefits significantly from table pruning, which extracts compact sub-tables by eliminating redundant cells to streamline downstream reasoning. However, existing pruning methods typically rely on sequential revisions driven by unreliable critique signals, often failing to detect the loss of answer-critical data. To address this limitation, we propose TabTrim, a novel table pruning framework which transforms table pruning from sequential revisions to gold trajectory-supervised parallel search. TabTrim derives a gold pruning trajectory using the intermediate sub-tables in the execution process of gold SQL queries, and trains a pruner and a verifier to make the step-wise pruning result align with the gold pruning trajectory. During inference, TabTrim performs parallel search to explore multiple candidate pruning trajectories and identify the optimal sub-table. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TabTrim achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse tabular reasoning tasks: TabTrim-8B reaches 73.5% average accuracy, outperforming the strongest baseline by 3.2%, including 79.4% on WikiTQ and 61.2% on TableBench.

Abstract:
Human evaluation plays a critical role in assessing the quality of generated text. However, the reliability and reproducibility of these evaluations depend on transparent and well-documented protocols—details that are frequently missing in current practice. In this work, we conduct a large-scale analysis of human evaluation protocols for evaluating long-form generation tasks in CL conference publications from 2023–2025, including a full manual review of 284 papers and LLM-assisted analysis for another 1.8k+ papers. We define a set of 20 reportable criteria related to reproducibility of human evaluation studies, and apply these criteria to systematically examine reporting norms and practices within the community. We find widespread under-reporting of important aspects of human evaluation study design, leading to ambiguity about what was measured and how, who contributed judgments, and how judgments should be interpreted. Based on these findings, we outline actionable recommendations to support more transparent and reproducible reporting in future research.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) have become capable of generating long and descriptive code summaries, accurate and reliable evaluation of factual consistency has become a critical challenge. However, previous evaluation methods are primarily designed for short summaries of isolated code snippets. Consequently, they struggle to provide fine-grained evaluation of multi-sentence functionalities and fail to accurately assess dependency context commonly found in real-world code summaries.To address this, we propose ReFEree, a reference-free and fine-grained method for evaluating factual consistency in real-world code summaries. We define factual inconsistency criteria specific to code summaries and evaluate them at the segment level using these criteria along with dependency information. These segment-level results are then aggregated into a fine-grained score. We construct a code summarization benchmark with human-annotated factual consistency labels. The evaluation results demonstrate that ReFEree achieves the highest correlation with human judgment among 13 baselines, improving 15-18% over the previous state-of-the-art. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/bsy99615/ReFEree.git.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit uneven performance across languages. In language-specific applications, practitioners often rely on target-language corpora or cross-lingual transfer to achieve better performance. However, traditional linguistic typology, commonly used as a transfer language selection strategy in previous studies, may not align with LLM’s perception of language similarity. This work proposes LLM-based language similarity as a novel perspective for selecting effective fine-tuning languages. We construct a framework to quantify the similarity within each language pair through both the lenses of language-specific performance patterns and cross-lingual transferability, ultimately deriving three similarity score matrices. Moreover, we observe a counter-intuitive phenomenon: super-additive transfer effect, where fine-tuning on a certain language yields higher performance than fine-tuning directly on the target language. Additionally, due to the absence of an existing dataset meeting our experimental requirements, we construct and release M4CQ-Pro dataset, which features domain-diverse distribution of 135 tasks and content consistency across 31 languages (including over 20 medium- and low-resource languages), with 61518 manually reviewed high-quality questions per language. We evaluate our approach on representative multilingual LLMs and results show that all three LLM-based similarity measures effectively guide fine-tuning language selection, outperforming traditional linguistic similarity, with the integrated measure achieving the best results. Our approach provides not only a novel perspective on language similarity, but also practical baselines for selecting fine-tuning languages.

Abstract:
Misinformation is on the rise, and the strong writing capabilities of LLMs lower the barrier for malicious actors to produce and disseminate false information. We study how LLMs behave when prompted to spread misinformation across languages and target countries, and introduce GlobalLies, a multilingual parallel dataset of 440 misinformation generation prompt templates and 6,867 entities, spanning 8 languages and 195 countries. Using both human annotations and large-scale LLM-as-a-judge evaluations across hundreds of thousands of generations from state-of-the-art models, we show that misinformation generation varies systematically based on the country being discussed. Propagation of lies by LLMs is substantially higher in many lower-resource languages and for countries with a lower Human Development Index (HDI). We find that existing mitigation strategies provide uneven protection: input safety classifiers exhibit cross-lingual gaps, and retrieval-augmented fact-checking remains inconsistent across regions due to unequal information availability. We release GlobalLies for research purposes, aiming to support the development of mitigation strategies to reduce the spread of global misinformation: https://github.com/zohaib-khan5040/globallies

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities but often grapple with reliability challenges like hallucinations. While Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer explicit grounding, existing paradigms of KG-augmented LLMs typically exhibit cognitive rigidity—applying homogeneous search strategies that render them vulnerable to instability under neighborhood noise and structural misalignment leading to reasoning stagnation. To address these challenges, we propose CoG, a training-free framework inspired by Dual-Process Theory that mimics the interplay between intuition and deliberation. First, functioning as the fast, intuitive process, the Relational Blueprint Guidance module leverages relational blueprints as interpretable soft structural constraints to rapidly stabilize the search direction against noise. Second, functioning as the prudent, analytical process, the Failure-Aware Refinement module intervenes upon encountering reasoning impasses. It triggers evidence-conditioned reflection and executes controlled backtracking to overcome reasoning stagnation. Experimental results on three benchmarks demonstrate that CoG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in both accuracy and efficiency.

Abstract:
Parallel programming is central to HPC and AI, but producing code that is correct and fast remains challenging, especially for OpenMP GPU offload, where data movement and tuning dominate. Autonomous coding agents can compile, test, and profile on target hardware, but outputs are brittle without domain scaffolding.We present ParaCodex, an HPC-engineer workflow that turns a Codex-based agent into an autonomous OpenMP GPU offload system using staged hotspot analysis, explicit data planning, correctness gating, and profiling-guided refinement. We evaluate translation from serial CPU kernels to OpenMP GPU offload kernels on HeCBench, Rodinia, and NAS. After excluding five kernels, ParaCodex succeeded on all 31 valid kernels. In 27/31 (87%) of these valid cases, the generated kernels improved GPU time over reference implementations, a result that holds independently on both the A100 and RTX 4060. The resulting OpenMP kernels achieve geometric-mean speedups of 3.1 (A100) and 3.6 (RTX 4060) on HeCBench and 1.5 and 1.1 on Rodinia, and outperform a zero-shot Codex baseline on all suites. We also evaluate CUDA -> OpenMP offload translation on ParEval, where ParaCodex maintains high compilation and validation rates in code-only and end-to-end settings.ParaCodex is available at https://github.com/Scientific-Computing-Lab/ParaCodex

Abstract:
Training models on a carefully chosen portion of data rather than the full dataset is now a standard preprocess for modern ML. From vision coreset selection to large-scale filtering in language models, it enables scalability with minimal utility loss. A common intuition is that training on fewer samples should also reduce privacy risks. In this paper, we challenge this assumption. We show that subset training is not privacy free: the very choices of which data are included or excluded can introduce new privacy surface and leak more sensitive information. Such information can be captured by adversaries either through side-channel metadata from the subset selection process or via the outputs of the target model. To systematically study this phenomenon, we propose CoLA (Choice Leakage Attack), a unified framework for analyzing privacy leakage in subset selection. In CoLA, depending on the adversary’s knowledge of the side-channel information, we define two practical attack scenarios: Subset-aware Side-channel Attacks and Black-box Attacks. Under both scenarios, we investigate two privacy surfaces unique to subset training: (1) Training-membership MIA (TM-MIA), which concerns only the privacy of training data membership, and (2) Selection-participation MIA (SP-MIA), which concerns the privacy of all samples that participated in the subset selection process. Notably, SP-MIA enlarges the notion of membership from model training to the entire data-model supply chain. Experiments on vision and language models show that existing threat models underestimate subset-training privacy risks: the expanded privacy surface leaks both training and selection membership, extending risks from individual models to the broader ML ecosystem.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to medicine, yet their adoption is limited by concerns over reliability and safety. Existing evaluations either test factual medical knowledge in isolation or assess patient-level reasoning without verifying correctness, leaving a critical gap. We introduce MediEval, a benchmark that links MIMIC-IV electronic health records (EHRs) to a unified knowledge base built from UMLS and other biomedical vocabularies. MediEval generates diverse factual and counterfactual medical statements within real patient contexts, enabling systematic evaluation across a 4-quadrant framework that jointly considers knowledge grounding and contextual consistency. Using this framework, we identify critical failure modes, including hallucinated support and truth inversion, that current proprietary, open-source, and domain-specific LLMs frequently exhibit. To address these risks, we propose Counterfactual Risk-Aware Fine-tuning (CoRFu), a DPO-based method with an asymmetric penalty targeting unsafe confusions. CoRFu improves by +16.4 macro-F1 points over the base model and eliminates truth inversion errors, demonstrating both higher accuracy and substantially greater safety.

Abstract:
Recent evaluations show that large language models (LLMs) frequently fail to challenge users’ harmful beliefs in domains ranging from medical advice to social reasoning. We present a unifying analysis through the lens of pragmatics: these safety failures can be understood and addressed as LLMs exhibiting excessive accommodation and insufficient epistemic vigilance. We show that the pragmatic factors affecting accommodation and epistemic vigilance in humans (at-issueness, linguistic encoding, and source reliability) influence LLM behaviors in similar ways. We demonstrate how these factors explain performance differences across three safety benchmarks that test models’ ability to challenge harmful beliefs, spanning misinformation (Cancer-Myth, SAGE-Eval) and sycophancy (ELEPHANT). This pragmatic lens further motivates prompting interventions, such as adding the phrase "wait a minute", that drastically improve performance on these difficult benchmarks by shifting pragmatic cues. Our results have practical implications for benchmark design and underscore the importance of pragmatics for understanding model behavior and improving performance.

Authors: Xueqing Peng, Lingfei Qian, Yan Wang, Ruoyu Xiang, Yueru He, Yang Ren, Mingyang Jiang, Vincent Jim Zhang, Yuqing Guo, Jeff Zhao, Huan He, Yi Han, Yun Feng, Yuechen Jiang, Yupeng Cao, Haohang Li, Yangyang Yu, Xiaoyu Wang, Penglei Gao, Shengyuan Lin, Keyi Wang, Shanshan Yang, Yilun Zhao, Zhiwei Liu, Peng Lu, Jerry Huang, Suyuchen Wang, Triantafillos Papadopoulos, Polydoros Giannouris, Efstathia Soufleri, Nuo Chen, Zhiyang Deng, Heming Fu, Yijia Zhao, Mingquan Lin, Meikang Qiu, Kaleb E Smith, Arman Cohan, Xiao-Yang Liu, Jimin Huang, Guojun Xiong, Alejandro Lopez-Lira, Xi Chen, Junichi Tsujii, Jian-Yun Nie, Sophia Ananiadou, Qianqian Xie

Abstract:
Real-world financial analysis involves information across multiple languages and modalities, from reports and news to scanned filings and meeting recordings. Yet most existing evaluations of LLMs in finance remain text-only, monolingual, and largely saturated by current models. To bridge these gaps, we present MultiFinBen, the first expert-annotated multilingual (five languages) and multimodal (text, vision, audio) benchmark for evaluating LLMs in realistic financial contexts. MultiFinBen introduces two new task families: multilingual financial reasoning, which tests cross-lingual evidence integration from filings and news, and financial OCR, which extracts structured text from scanned documents containing tables and charts. Rather than aggregating all available datasets, we apply a structured, difficulty-aware selection based on advanced model performance, ensuring balanced challenge and removing redundant tasks. Evaluating 21 leading LLMs shows that even frontier multimodal models like GPT-4o achieve only 46.01% overall, stronger on vision and audio but dropping sharply in multilingual settings. These findings expose persistent limitations in multilingual, multimodal, and expert-level financial reasoning. All datasets, evaluation scripts, and leaderboards are publicly released.

Abstract:
Federated fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) is obstructed by a trilemma of challenges: protecting LLMs intellectual property (IP), ensuring client privacy, and mitigating performance loss on heterogeneous data. Existing methods like Offsite-Tuning (OT) secure the LLMs IP by having clients train only lightweight adapters, yet our analysis reveals they suffer from a fundamental performance bottleneck, leaving a significant gap compared to centralized training. To bridge this gap, we introduce FedProxy, a new federated adaptation framework. FedProxy replaces weak adapters with a unified, powerful Proxy Small Language Model (SLM), compressed from the proprietary LLM, to serve as a high-fidelity surrogate for collaborative fine-tuning. Our framework systematically resolves the trilemma through a three-stage architecture: (i) Efficient Representation via server-guided compression to create a resource-friendly proxy; (ii) Robust Optimization through an interference-mitigating aggregation strategy to handle data heterogeneity; and (iii) Effortless Fusion via a training-free "plug-in" mechanism to integrate learned knowledge back into the LLM. Experiments show FedProxy significantly outperforms OT methods and approaches centralized performance, establishing a new benchmark for secure and high-performance federated LLM adaptation.

Abstract:
The necessity of explicit linguistic representations has been increasingly questioned in the era of large language models (LLMs). In this work, we revisit this issue using Universal Dependencies (UD) as a case study, examining whether and in what ways this cross-lingual syntactic framework can still benefit contemporary LLMs. We focus on a cross-lingual adversarial paraphrase identification task that is designed to foreground the role of syntactic structure in semantic interpretation across languages. Within this setting, we systematically evaluate three strategies for integrating UD into LLMs: UD-Prompt, UD-Tuning, and UD-Attention. Our experiments show that, although the magnitude of gains depends on how UD-based structural priors interact with model behavior and cross-lingual variation, UD-augmented models consistently outperform their syntax-agnostic counterparts. Across strategies, we observe average accuracy improvements of 2.67%, 8.24%, and 2.53%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that linguistic knowledge remains informative for LLMs, offering practical value in cross-lingual settings where structural alignment is challenging.

Abstract:
Recent multimodal LLMs have shown promise in chart-based visual question answering, but their performance declines sharply on unannotated charts—those requiring precise visual interpretation rather than relying on textual shortcuts. To address this, we introduce ChartAgent, a novel agentic framework that explicitly performs visual reasoning directly within the chart’s spatial domain. Unlike textual chain-of-thought reasoning, ChartAgent iteratively decomposes queries into visual subtasks and actively manipulates and interacts with chart images through specialized actions such as drawing annotations, cropping regions (e.g., segmenting pie slices, isolating bars), and localizing axes, using a library of chart-specific vision tools to fulfill each subtask. This iterative reasoning process closely mirrors human cognitive strategies for chart comprehension. ChartAgent achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on the ChartBench and ChartX benchmarks, surpassing prior methods by up to 16.07% absolute gain overall and 17.31% on unannotated, numerically intensive queries. Furthermore, our analyses show that ChartAgent is (a) effective across diverse chart types, (b) achieves the highest scores across varying visual and reasoning complexity levels, and (c) serves as a plug-and-play framework that boosts performance across diverse underlying LLMs. Our work is among the first to demonstrate visually grounded reasoning for chart understanding using tool-augmented multimodal agents.

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) are central to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), providing the critical supervision signals that align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.Generative reward models (GRMs) provide greater interpretability than traditional scalar RMs, but they come with a critical trade-off: pairwise methods are hindered by a training-inference mismatch, while pointwise methods require expensive absolute annotations.To bridge this gap, we propose the Preference-aware Task-adaptive Reward Model (PaTaRM).Unlike prior approaches, PaTaRM enables robust pointwise training using readily available pairwise data via a novel Preference-Aware Reward (PAR) mechanism, eliminating the need for explicit rating labels. Furthermore, it incorporates a task-adaptive rubric system that dynamically generates instance-specific criteria for precise evaluation.Extensive experiments demonstrate that PaTaRM achieves an average relative improvement of 8.7% over the corresponding base models on RewardBench and RMBench across the Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-14B backbones.Crucially, when used as a reward model for downstream RLHF, it yields an average relative improvement of 13.6% over the corresponding base policies on IFEval and InfoBench, validating its effectiveness for policy alignment.Our code, data, and checkpoints are available at https://huggingface.co/AIJian/PaTaRM

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong general intelligence, yet their multilingual performance remains highly imbalanced. Although LLMs encode substantial cross-lingual knowledge in a unified semantic space, they often struggle to reliably interface this knowledge with low-resource or unseen languages. Fortunately, pretrained encoder-decoder translation models already possess balanced multilingual capacity, suggesting a natural complement to LLMs. In this work, we propose XBridge, a compositional encoder-LLM-decoder architecture that offloads multilingual understanding and generation to external pretrained translation models, while preserving the LLM as an English-centric core for general knowledge processing and reasoning. To address the resulting representation misalignment across models, we introduce lightweight cross-model mapping layers together with an optimal transport-based alignment objective, enabling fine-grained semantic consistency for multilingual generation. Experiments on four LLMs across multilingual understanding, reasoning, and generation indicate that XBridge outperforms strong baselines, especially on low-resource and previously unseen languages, without retraining the LLM.

Abstract:
Insurance claims adjudication demands not only accurate decisions but also interpretable reasoning grounded in policy clauses. However, existing benchmarks are limited to information retrieval or simple multiple-choice setups, which fail to require step-by-step inferences from facts to conclusions. To address this gap, we introduce InsLogicBench, a benchmark providing complete reasoning traces that link factual inputs, relevant policy clauses, and final verdicts. We construct the dataset using a controllable synthesis framework based on the Nested Toulmin Model. By capturing the defeasible logic of insurance policies through hierarchical truth assignment and enforcing validity via consistency verification, we ensure interpretability and logical rigor across generated examples. We evaluate eight Large Language Models (LLMs) on InsLogicBench. Results show significant difficulties in handling exception clauses and verifying missing conditions. Notably, models often produce correct final decisions but fail to provide precise justifications, highlighting a critical discrepancy between their decision accuracy and logical reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
In recent years, rapid advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have increasingly stimulated research on ancient Chinese scripts. As the evolution of written characters constitutes a fundamental pathway for understanding cultural transformation and historical continuity, how MLLMs can be systematically leveraged to support and advance text evolution analysis remains an open and largely underexplored problem. To bridge this gap, we construct a comprehensive benchmark comprising 11 tasks and over 130,000 instances, specifically designed to evaluate the capability of MLLMs in analyzing the evolution of ancient Chinese scripts. We conduct extensive evaluations across multiple widely used MLLMs and observe that, while existing models demonstrate a limited ability in glyph-level comparison, their performance on core tasks-such as character recognition and evolutionary reasoning-remains substantially constrained. Motivated by these findings, we propose a glyph-driven fine-tuning framework (GEVO) that explicitly encourages models to capture evolutionary consistency in glyph transformations and enhances their understanding of text evolution. Experimental results show that even models at the 2B scale achieve consistent and comprehensive performance improvements across all evaluated tasks. To facilitate future research, we publicly release both the benchmark and the trained models.

Abstract:
Table question answering (TableQA) is a fundamental task in natural language processing (NLP). The strong reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have brought significant advances in this field. However, as real-world applications involve increasingly complex questions and larger tables, substantial noisy data is introduced, which severely degrades reasoning performance. To address this challenge, we focus on improving two core capabilities: Relevance Filtering, which identifies and retains information truly relevant to reasoning, and Table Pruning, which reduces table size while preserving essential content. Based on these principles, we propose EnoTab, a dual denoising framework for complex questions and large-scale tables. Specifically, we first perform Evidence-based Question Denoising by decomposing the question into minimal semantic units and filtering out those irrelevant to answer reasoning based on consistency and usability criteria. Then, we propose Evidence Tree-guided Table Denoising, which constructs an explicit and transparent table pruning path to remove irrelevant data step by step. At each pruning step, we observe the intermediate state of the table and apply a post-order node rollback mechanism to handle abnormal table states, ultimately producing a highly reliable sub-table for final answer reasoning. Finally, extensive experiments show that EnoTab achieves outstanding performance on TableQA tasks with complex questions and large-scale tables, confirming its effectiveness.

Abstract:
Key-Value (KV) caching is widely used in large language models (LLMs) to enable long-context inference efficiently, yet its security implications remain underexplored. We present the first systematic study of how KV cache compression interacts with jailbreak attacks, evaluating four model families under diverse jailbreak attacks. We identify a double-edged effect: (i) on one hand, compression can induce Accidental Robustness, where optimization-based and encoding-based attacks fail due to Malicious Semantic Eviction, where attacks’ own attention redirection reduces the malicious query’s cache importance, and Gradient Mismatch where discrete compression operations break jailbreak optimization. (ii) On the other hand, Vulnerability Paradox arises under merging-based compression for human-designed Attacks, where aggressive merging in shallow layers triggers functional head collapse, amplifying attack success rates. To address this, we propose Safe-CAM, a history-aware, per-head feedback merging strategy that prevents safety degradation while maintaining efficiency. Experiments show Safe-CAM fully restores safety (0% ASR) and improves benign task performance with minimal overhead. Our study highlights that KV cache compression is not only an efficiency mechanism but also a safety-critical design factor in LLM deployment.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex problem-solving but frequently overlook specific instruction constraints. Existing alignment methods struggle to balance general reasoning with instruction-following (IF), hindered by dependency on teacher models, reward hacking, and reasoning-answer inconsistencies. We propose PARIF, a two-stage curriculum learning framework based on Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to enhance both IF and general reasoning capabilities. The framework employs a correctness proxy across different stages to mitigate reward hacking. Stage I employs a dynamic weighting strategy simultaneously to optimize the model’s reasoning paradigm regarding constraints. Stage II introduces Decoupled-GRPO, which builds upon the first stage to enhance the logical consistency between the reasoning process and the final answer, enabling the model to better leverage its optimized reasoning paradigm. To support the framework, we curate 26,000 high-quality instructions featuring diverse constraints. Extensive experiments demonstrate PARIF’s effectiveness: our 7B model achieves a remarkable 21.25% relative average improvement to the original model across six representative IF tasks, while our 8B model outperforms leading models like DeepSeek-V3 on these IF tasks, effectively pushing the Pareto frontier of instruction following and reasoning for models of comparable scale. We open-source our code and models to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Large language models have significantly advanced Multilingual Machine Translation (MMT), yet scaling to many languages while keeping quality robust across directions remains challenging.In this paper, we identify a failure mode of multilingual supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on multi-way parallel data: when such data are reused symmetrically around a pivot language (e.g., English), performance on reverse directions (X → pivot) can drop substantially.We term this phenomenon Directional Degeneration and attribute it to excessive many-to-one mappings, which encourage shortcut learning.We propose Strategic Downsampling (SD), a simple yet effective method to mitigate this degeneration.In addition, we introduce Parallel Multilingual Prompting (PMP), which augments translation instructions with an auxiliary parallel sentence to promote cross-lingual transfer during training and enables optional test-time enhancement when auxiliary translations are available. We further develop NiuTrans.LMT ( L arge-scale M ultilingual T ranslation, abbreviated as LMT ), a Chinese–English-centric suite of multilingual translation models spanning four sizes (0.6B/1.7B/4B/8B) and covering 60 languages and 234 directions.Comprehensive evaluations show that LMT is competitive among open-source MMT systems, and that our 4B LMT model performs on par with or better than substantially larger baselines. We release our models and project resources to support inclusive and scalable MMT.

Abstract:
N -ary knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer missing components in facts with multiple entities under distinct semantic roles, commonly formulated as a knowledge hypergraph link prediction task. Most embedding-based approaches score individual hyperedges relying on enriched structural representations, but overlook intermediate propagation states containing complementary local and global structural evidence. Despite their capability to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) representations for the classical KGC task, large language models (LLMs) struggle with hypergraph structure involving multiple facts, while current hypergraph QA methods only provide LLMs with a single query signal rather than path-level evidence. These limitations hinder the transferability of existing methods, especially those leveraging LLMs, to solve the knowledge hypergraph link prediction problem. To bridge this gap, we propose HyperCoT, a structure-aware approach that models multi-hop structural reasoning as a depth-sensitive progressive evidence accumulation process. It constructs a Graphical Chain-of-Thought (Graph-CoT) by aggregating role-aware hyperedge states along strongly correlated reasoning paths, and injects the resulting path-level structural evidence into each token in query and candidate entities to prompt LLMs. Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that HyperCoT consistently outperforms strong n -ary KGC baselines, particularly in high arity and structural sparsity scenarios, meanwhile yielding interpretable multi-hop reasoning traces.

Abstract:
Urban transportation systems require precise modeling of dynamic spatiotemporal patterns across diverse tasks, such as traffic forecasting, electric vehicle (EV) charging demand prediction, and taxi dispatch. Existing approaches suffer from two key limitations: traditional deep learning models are task-specific and lack generalization capabilities, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with structured spatiotemporal data and numerical reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose TransLLM, a unified multi-task framework that synergizes spatiotemporal encoding with LLM reasoning through learnable prompt composition. To enable LLMs to perceive complex graph dependencies, we design a noise-augmented spatiotemporal encoder that projects structured signals into the LLM’s embedding space. Furthermore, to overcome the rigidity of fixed prompt templates in heterogeneous traffic scenarios, we introduce an instance-level prompt routing mechanism trained via reinforcement learning. The framework operates by encoding spatiotemporal patterns into contextual representations, dynamically composing personalized prompts to guide LLM reasoning, and projecting the resulting representations through specialized output layers to generate task-specific predictions. Experiments on seven datasets and three tasks demonstrate that TransLLM outperforms many baselines, showing superior adaptability in both supervised and zero-shot settings with excellent generalization and robustness. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/lengjiaming/TransLLM.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) serve a global audience, alignment must transition from enforcing universal consensus to respecting cultural pluralism. We demonstrate that dense models, when forced to fit conflicting value distributions, suffer from Mean Collapse, converging to a generic average that fails to represent diverse groups. We attribute this to Cultural Sparsity, where gradient interference prevents dense parameters from spanning distinct cultural modes. To resolve this, we propose CuMA (Cultural Mixture of Adapters), a framework that frames alignment as a conditional capacity separation problem. By incorporating demographic-aware routing, CuMA internalizes a Latent Cultural Topology to explicitly disentangle conflicting gradients into specialized expert subspaces. Extensive evaluations on WorldValuesBench, Community Alignment, and PRISM demonstrate that CuMA achieves competitive performance, outperforming both dense baselines and semantic-only MoEs. Our analysis confirms that CuMA effectively mitigates mean collapse and preserves cultural diversity. Our code is available at https://github.com/Throll/CuMA.

Abstract:
Financial numerical reasoning demands rigorous adherence to domain-specific logic and precise evidence foundation. However, large language models (LLMs) are prone to forced generation when confronting ambiguous evidence or complex recursive dependencies, often hallucinating values to bridge information gaps. To address this, we propose graph-bounded financial reasoning (GBFR), a neuro-symbolic framework that imposes semantic and structural constraints via a financial metric knowledge graph (FMKG). Unlike sequential generation paradigms, our approach employs a parallel graph-constrained reasoning algorithm that orchestrates specialized operators to simultaneously explore heterogeneous derivation paths of complex financial metrics. Through cross-path verification, the framework aggregates only semantically consistent results, ensuring reasoning is bounded by available context. Crucially, this approach enables safe abstention by distinguishing genuine data absence from retrieval failure, thereby preventing ungrounded fabrication. To evaluate this capability, we further construct counterfactual samples by perturbing entities, times, and metrics to synthesize unanswerable scenarios. Empirical evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate that GBFR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
The "Fine-Tuning-as-a-Service" paradigm exposes large language models to catastrophic safety degradation from less harmful samples. Alignment-stage defenses address this by proactively injecting adversarial perturbations to bolster the model’s inherent robustness against harmful drift. However, existing methods rely on perturbation directions that often conflict with harmful gradients, inadvertently facilitating the acquisition of malicious features rather than suppressing them. To address this issue, we propose Orthogonal and Adaptive Safety Alignment Strategy (OASIS) to mathematically decouple safety enforcement from harmful feature acquisition. By projecting perturbations orthogonal to harmful gradients and concentrating optimization on adaptively selected safety-critical layers, OASIS effectively resolves directional conflicts while maximizing parameter efficiency. Extensive experiments on four LLMs across three datasets (SST2, GSM8K, and AGNews) demonstrate that OASIS reduces the Harmful Score by approximately 60% compared to competitive baselines, while maintaining stable downstream task utility.

Abstract:
The evolution of morality presents a puzzle: natural selection should favor self-interest, yet humans developed moral systems promoting altruism. Traditional approaches must abstract away cognitive processes, leaving open how cognitive factors shape moral evolution. We introduce an LLM-based agent simulation framework that brings cognitive realism to this question: agents with varying moral dispositions perceive, remember, reason, and decide in a simulated prehistoric hunter-gatherer society. This enables us to manipulate factors that traditional models cannot represent—such as moral type observability and communication bandwidth—and to discover emergent cognitive mechanisms from agent interactions. Across 20 runs spanning four settings, we find that cooperation and mutual help are the central driver of evolutionary survival, with universal and reciprocal morality exhibiting the most stable outcomes across conditions while selfishness is strongly disfavoured. Beyond cooperation itself, we further identify cognition as a central mediator—most clearly through a cost of moral judgment that shifts the winning moral type across settings, with a self-purging effect among selfish agents as an additional cognitive pattern. We validate robustness across multiple LLM backbones, architecture ablations, and prompt sensitivity analyses. This work establishes LLM-based simulation as a powerful new paradigm to complement traditional research in evolutionary biology and anthropology, opening new avenues for investigating the complexities of moral and social evolution.

Abstract:
Credit assignment is a fundamental challenge in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, particularly in embodied AI settings characterized by limited and delayed feedback as well as dynamically changing numbers of active agents. We propose MARS-RA, a framework that reformulates credit assignment as a rank aggregation problem using contribution-based pairwise comparisons among agents generated by large multimodal models. This shift from absolute to relative estimation ensures robustness against noise and dynamic agent participation, converting comparison results into contribution scores for potential-based reward shaping. We provide theoretical justification for the convergence and robustness of the proposed framework, and show that Shapley values can be used as an interpretive reference. Experimental results on challenging tasks of different types indicate that MARS-RA can guide agents toward effective cooperation.

Abstract:
Label-free reinforcement learning enables large language models to improve reasoning capabilities without ground-truth supervision, typically by treating majority-voted answers as pseudo-labels. However, we identify a critical failure mode: as training maximizes self-consistency, output diversity collapses, causing the model to confidently reinforce systematic errors that evade detection. We term this the consensus trap. To escape it, we propose CoVerRL, a framework where a single model alternates between generator and verifier roles, with each capability bootstrapping the other. Majority voting provides noisy but informative supervision for training the verifier, while the improving verifier progressively filters self-consistent errors from pseudo-labels. This co-evolution creates a virtuous cycle that maintains high reward accuracy throughout training. Experiments across Qwen and Llama model families demonstrate that CoVerRL outperforms label-free baselines by 4.7-5.9% on mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Moreover, self-verification accuracy improves from around 55% to over 85%, confirming that both capabilities genuinely co-evolve.

Abstract:
Advancing from usable to collaborative autonomy requires driving systems to execute passenger instructions safely and reliably. This work formulates instruction realization as scheduling across multiple motion planners and presents a dual-loop framework that provides a transparent decision chain from natural language to vehicle control. The outer loop uses a small language model (SLM) for high-level, low-frequency semantic reasoning and schedule generation, while the inner loop performs low-level, high-frequency schedule execution and vehicle control. To compensate for the SLM’s limited capacity, the framework integrates receding-horizon scheduling to segment long-horizon instruction tasks, a domain-specific language (DSL) that restricts SLM outputs to a scheduling-oriented subspace, and reinforcement learning in high-fidelity urban traffic to refine the SLM’s DSL proficiency and scheduling performance. Experiments show that the framework improves instruction-completion rates while maintaining high safety and compliance relative to multiple baselines.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the standard approach for adapting large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks. However, we observe a persistent failure mode: even after convergence, models often fail to correctly reproduce a subset of their own supervised training data. We refer to this behavior as the Incomplete Learning Phenomenon (ILP). This paper presents the first systematic study of ILP in LLM fine-tuning. We formalize ILP as post-training failure to internalize supervised instances and demonstrate its prevalence across multiple model families, domains, and datasets. Through controlled analyses, we identify five recurrent sources of incomplete learning: (1) missing prerequisite knowledge in the pre-trained model, (2) conflicts between SFT supervision and pre-training knowledge, (3) internal inconsistencies within SFT data, (4) left-side forgetting during sequential fine-tuning, and (5) insufficient optimization for rare or complex patterns. We introduce a diagnostic-first framework that maps unlearned samples to these causes using observable training and inference signals, and study several targeted mitigation strategies as causal interventions. Experiments on Qwen, LLaMA, and OLMo2 show that incomplete learning is widespread and heterogeneous, and that improvements in aggregate metrics can mask persistent unlearned subsets. The findings highlight the need for fine-grained diagnosis of what supervised fine-tuning fails to learn, and why.

Abstract:
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), automated code generation has made remarkable progress. Recent studies explore multi-agent collaboration and adopt planning–coding–debugging workflows to enhance performance. However, these approaches are constrained by rigid, predefined workflows that fail to flexibly adjust their plans and lack effective verification of intermediate reasoning steps. In this work, we propose MavenCoder, a model-adaptive and verification–enhanced framework for competition-level code generation. MavenCoder leverages adaptive assessment aligned with the model’s capabilities to select planning strategies, while providing timely feedback and correction via multi-perspective verification. This adaptive problem-solving paradigm mitigates earlier limitations by enabling flexible planning and timely error correction. Compared with existing state-of-the-art approaches, MavenCoder achieves superior pass@1 results across multiple benchmarks, achieving 87.5% on LiveCodeBench, 93.9% on HumanEval+, 81.7% on MBPP+, and 46.1% on CodeContests, outperforming recent agent-based systems with improvement exceeding 3%–40%.

Abstract:
Medical consultations are intrinsically speech-centric. However, most prior works focus on long-text-based interactions, which are cumbersome and patient-unfriendly. Recent advances in speech language models (SpeechLMs) have enabled more natural speech-based interaction, yet the scarcity of medical speech data and the inefficiency of directly fine-tuning on speech data jointly hinder the adoption of SpeechLMs in medical consultation. In this paper, we propose SpeechMedAssist, a SpeechLM natively capable of conducting speech-based multi-turn interactions with patients. By exploiting the architectural properties of SpeechLMs, we decouple the conventional one-stage training into a two-stage paradigm consisting of (1) Knowledge Capability Injection via Text and (2) Modality Re-alignment with Limited Speech Data, thereby reducing the requirement for medical speech data to only 10k synthesized samples. To evaluate SpeechLMs for medical consultation scenarios, we design a benchmark comprising both single-turn question answering and multi-turn simulated interactions. Experimental results show that our model outperforms all baselines in both effectiveness and robustness in most evaluation settings.

Abstract:
The path to fully autonomous web agents is currently hindered by a critical bottleneck: their limited ability to handle CAPTCHA. Existing agent benchmarks largely ignore this practical challenge, failing to evaluate an agent’s real-world capacity to solve CAPTCHA. To bridge this gap, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of real-world CAPTCHA distributions and introduce MirrorCAPTCHA, a benchmark annotated with Weighted Pass Rate and a newly proposed metric Completion Degree. MirrorCAPTCHA is designed to serve as a “mirror” that faithfully reflects the automation capabilities of agents in real scenarios. We filter 2095 websites from Common Crawl, identify the CAPTCHA deployed on these sites, and cluster them into 18 distinct categories using K-means algorithm. To ensure practicality, we extract a web subgraph from Common Crawl covering these websites and use random walks to simulate real-world CAPTCHA encounter frequencies, yielding a realistic measure of agents’ ability. Additionally, we develop a lightweight synthetic data pipeline to train Ovis2-Agent-CAPTCHA-8B, which significantly outperforms current state-of-the-art closed-source models on MirrorCAPTCHA, achieving a 9.4% higher average Weighted Pass Rate and a 2.13% higher average Completion Degree than the runner-up, Gemini-2.5-Pro.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enabled mobile agents to perceive and interact with real-world mobile environments based on human instructions. However, the current fully autonomous paradigm poses potential safety risks when model understanding or reasoning capabilities are insufficient. To address this challenge, we first introduce InquireBench , a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate mobile agents’ capabilities in safe interaction and proactive inquiry with users, encompassing 5 categories and 22 sub-categories, where most existing VLM-based agents demonstrate near-zero performance. In this paper, we aim to develop an interactive system that actively seeks human confirmation at critical decision points. To achieve this, we propose InquireMobile , a novel model inspired by reinforcement learning, featuring a two-stage training strategy and an interactive pre-action reasoning mechanism. Finally, our model achieves an 46.8% improvement in inquiry success rate and the best overall success rate among existing baselines on InquireBench. The project page is available at https://bit-aqh.github.io/InquireMobile/homepage/ .

Abstract:
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle complex tasks, its reliance on discrete token decoding imposes an inherent Discreteness Bottleneck, limiting expressiveness within a restricted vocabulary space. Existing continuous reasoning approaches, such as SoftCoT, mitigate this but typically rely on external auxiliary models, resulting in complex deployment and fractured inference pipelines. To address these challenges, we propose Self-SoftCoT, a self-contained framework that enables a frozen LLM to internally generate and consume latent thoughts without external assistants. By establishing a single-stream "Thinking → Speaking" closed-loop, we decouple latent planning from explicit generation. Furthermore, we adopt Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) to stabilize learning and employ Position-Aware Independent Projection to mitigate representation homogenization. Experimental results on five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the reasoning performance of frozen LLMs. Specifically, our Qwen2.5-based model uses only N=2 soft tokens to outperform the SoftCoT baseline (N=4), improving the average accuracy from 75.06% to 78.42%. Similarly, LLaMA-3.1 performance increases from 70.52% to 74.55%.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in drafting responses to patient portal messages, yet their integration into clinical workflows raises various concerns, including whether they would actually save clinicians time and effort in their portal workload. We investigate LLM alignment with individual clinicians through a comprehensive evaluation of the patient message response drafting task. We develop a novel taxonomy of thematic elements in clinician responses and propose a novel evaluation framework for assessing clinician editing load of LLM-drafted responses at both content and theme levels. We release an expert-annotated dataset and conduct large-scale evaluations of local and commercial LLMs using various adaptation techniques including thematic prompting, retrieval-augmented generation, supervised fine-tuning, and direct preference optimization. Our results reveal substantial epistemic uncertainty in aligning LLM drafts with clinician responses. While LLMs demonstrate capability in drafting certain thematic elements, they struggle with clinician-aligned generation in other themes, particularly question asking to elicit further information from patients. Theme-driven adaptation strategies yield improvements across most themes. Our findings underscore the necessity of adapting LLMs to individual clinician preferences to enable reliable and responsible use in patient-clinician communication workflows.

Abstract:
Long context inference scenarios have become increasingly important for large language models, yet they introduce significant computational latency. While prior research has optimized long-sequence inference through operators, model architectures, and system frameworks, tokenization remains an overlooked bottleneck. Existing parallel tokenization methods accelerate processing through text segmentation and multi-process tokenization, but they suffer from inconsistent results due to boundary artifacts that occur after merging. To address this, we propose LoPT, a novel Lossless Parallel Tokenization framework that ensures output identical to standard sequential tokenization. Our approach employs character-position-based matching and dynamic chunk length adjustment to align and merge tokenized segments accurately. Extensive experiments across diverse long-text datasets demonstrate that LoPT achieves significant speedup while guaranteeing lossless tokenization. We also provide theoretical proof of consistency and comprehensive analytical studies to validate the robustness of our method.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a common practice in multimodal large language models (MLLM) to enhance factual grounding and reduce hallucination. Yet, its reliance on retrieval exposes MLLMs to knowledge poisoning attacks, in which adversaries deliberately inject malicious multimodal content into external knowledge bases to steer models toward generating incorrect or even harmful responses. We present MM-PoisonRAG, a framework to systematically study the vulnerability of multimodal RAG under knowledge poisoning. Specifically, we design two novel attack strategies: Localized Poisoning Attack (LPA), which implants targeted, query-specific multimodal misinformation to manipulate outputs toward attacker-controlled responses, and Globalized Poisoning Attack (GPA), which uses a single, untargeted adversarial injection to broadly corrupt reasoning and collapse generation quality across all queries. Extensive experiments on diverse tasks, multimodal RAG components, and attacker access levels reveal severe vulnerabilities: LPA achieves up to 56% attack success rate even under restricted access, and transfers effectively across four different retrievers without re-optimizing the adversaries. GPA completely disrupts model generation to 0% accuracy with just one poisoned content. Moreover, both LPA and GPA bypass existing defenses, underscoring the fragility of multimodal RAG and establishing MM-PoisonRAG as a foundation for future research on securing RAG frameworks against multimodal knowledge poisoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been reported to “leak” Personally Identifiable Information (PII), with successful PII reconstruction often interpreted as evidence of memorization. We propose a principled revision of memorization evaluation for LLMs, arguing that PII leakage should be evaluated under low lexical cue conditions, where target PII cannot be reconstructed through prompt-induced generalization or pattern completion. We formalize Cue-Resistant Memorization (CRM) as a cue-controlled evaluation framework and a necessary condition for valid memorization evaluation, explicitly conditioning on prompt-target overlap cues. Using CRM, we conduct a large-scale multilingual re-evaluation of PII leakage across 32 languages and multiple memorization paradigms. Revisiting reconstruction-based settings, including verbatim prefix-suffix completion and associative reconstruction, we find that their apparent effectiveness is driven primarily by direct surface-form cues rather than by true memorization. When such cues are controlled for, reconstruction success diminishes substantially. We further examine cue-free generation and membership inference, both of which exhibit extremely low true positive rates. Overall, our results suggest that previously reported PII leakage is better explained by cue-driven behavior than by genuine memorization, highlighting the importance of cue-controlled evaluation for reliably quantifying privacy-relevant memorization in LLMs.

Abstract:
To address toxic content on social media, we introduce SMARTER, a data-efficient 2-stage framework for explainable content moderation using Large Language Models (LLMs). In Stage 1, we leverage LLMs’ own outputs to generate synthetic explanations for correct and incorrect labels, enabling preference optimization with minimal supervision. In Stage 2, we refine explanation quality through cross-model training, allowing weaker models to align with stronger ones. Experiments on 3 benchmarks (HateXplain, Latent Hate, Implicit Hate) show SMARTER achieves up to 13% macro-F1 improvement over few-shot baselines using only 6-57% of training data. Our framework offers a scalable strategy for low-data settings by harnessing LLMs’ self-improvement for explainable moderation.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in boosting the objective performance (e.g., reasoning) of Large Language Models (LLMs) through rule-based, on-policy self-improvement strategies. However, optimizing LLMs for subjective capabilities and alignment with human preferences remains challenging due to the non-verifiable nature. Most prior works use datasets comprising response pairs with substantial quality gaps labeled by a strong external judge. While effective for preference metrics, this paradigm often incurs an “alignment tax”, where the model’s objective performance on downstream tasks degrades as it overfits to subjective preferences. In this work, we introduce Donkey, a high-quality, non-verifiable dataset where response pairs differ only by subtle nuances. We find that LLMs optimized on Donkey via preference learning outperform those trained on data with explicit quality gaps, while simultaneously maintaining their objective capabilities. Furthermore, we observe that preference signals on Donkey can be decomposed into consensus preferences and individual preferences. Our analysis reveals that distilling consensus preferences provides a significantly more data-efficient signal for preference optimization. Our findings underscore the importance of leveraging nuanced preference signals and the consensus of multiple judges for advancing subjective LLM alignment. Our code and data will be available at https://github.com/SJY8460/Donkey.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have revolutionized general visual understanding. However, their application in the food domain remains constrained by benchmarks that rely on coarse-grained categories, single-view imagery, and inaccurate metadata. To bridge this gap, we introduce DiningBench, a hierarchical, multi-view benchmark designed to evaluate VLMs across three levels of cognitive complexity: Fine-Grained Classification, Nutrition Estimation, and Visual Question Answering. Unlike previous datasets, DiningBench comprises 3,021 distinct dishes with an average of 5.27 images per entry, incorporating fine-grained "hard" negatives from identical menus and rigorous, verification-based nutritional data. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 29 state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary models. Our experiments reveal that while current VLMs excel at general reasoning, they struggle significantly with fine-grained visual discrimination and precise nutritional reasoning. Furthermore, we systematically investigate the impact of multi-view inputs and Chain-of-Thought reasoning, identifying five primary failure modes. DiningBench serves as a challenging testbed to drive the next generation of food-centric VLM research. All codes are released in https://github.com/meituan/DiningBench.

Abstract:
End-to-end (E2E) spoken dialogue systems are replacing cascaded pipelines for voice-based human-AI interaction. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate these systems on synthetic speech and single-turn tasks, leaving multi-turn conversational ability underexplored. We introduce Audio MultiChallenge an open-source benchmark to evaluate these systems under natural multi-turn interaction patterns. Building on the text-based MultiChallenge framework, which evaluates Inference Memory, Instruction Retention, and Self Coherence, we introduce a new axis Voice Editing that tests robustness to mid-utterance speech repairs and backtracking. We augment each axis to the audio modality, such as introducing Audio-Cue challenges for Inference Memory that require recalling ambient sounds and paralinguistic signals beyond semantic content. We curate 452 conversations from 47 speakers with 1,712 instance-specific rubrics through a hybrid pipeline that exposes model failures at scale while preserving natural disfluencies found in unscripted human speech. Our evaluation reveals that even frontier models struggle on our benchmark, with our highest-performing model achieving a 54.65% pass rate. Error analysis shows that models are not sufficiently robust to human speech when tracking instructions, edits, and audio cues, highlighting the need for improved audio-native multi-turn interaction capabilities.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong cross-domain capabilities, yet their competence in specialized professional tasks remains underexamined. Existing legal benchmarks evaluate isolated tasks or exam-style questions, failing to capture the procedural interdependencies and adjudicative rigor inherent in professional practice. To bridge this gap, we construct JurisBench, a vertical, depth-oriented, domain-specific benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs across key stages of Chinese civil litigation. JurisBench introduces a Linear Depth Simulation track that mirrors the cognitive workflow of professional judges through four sequential, dependency-aware phases: Cause of Action prediction, Focus of Disputes identification, Rationale of the Judgment generation, and Result of the Judgment determination. Results reveal an “illusion of competence”: state-of-the-art models exhibit marked performance degradation in end-to-end pipelines due to cascading error propagation. We identify precise statutory grounding as a persistent bottleneck, highlighting a critical gap between fluent linguistic output and judicial reliability. JurisBench shifts evaluation from isolated legal knowledge to workflow-level task execution, providing a diagnostic framework for legal AI and a template for benchmark design in specialized domains.

Abstract:
While GUI agents have shown strong performance under explicit and completion instructions, real-world deployment requires aligning with users’ more complex implicit intents. In this work, we highlight Hierarchical Implicit Intent Alignment for Personalized GUI Agent (PersonalAlign), a new agent task that requires agents to leverage long-term user records as persistent context to resolve omitted preferences in vague instructions and anticipate latent routines by user state for proactive assistance. To facilitate this study, we introduce AndroidIntent, a benchmark designed to evaluate agents’ ability in resolving vague instructions and providing proactive suggestions through reasoning over long-term user records. We annotated 775 user-specific preferences and 215 routines from 20k long-term records across different users for evaluation. Furthermore, we introduce Hierarchical Intent Memory Agent (HIM-Agent), which maintains a continuously updating personal memory and hierarchically organizes user preferences and routines for personalization. Finally, we evaluate a range of GUI agents on AndroidIntent, including GPT-5, Qwen3-VL, and UI-TARS, further results show that HIM-Agent significantly improves both execution and proactive performance by 15.7% and 7.3%.

Abstract:
Simulating human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) has been a longstanding problem in natural language processing (NLP). To address this, existing works introduce a reasoning step of event hiding (a.k.a. perspective-taking), where events unknown to a character are removed before question answering. However, resorting to event hiding for ToM reasoning presents a performance degradation issue due to the strict output format constraints involved in event hiding. To mitigate this issue, we propose generating perspective-taking outputs as free-form explanations without event hiding, but this poses a notable yet underexplored challenge: LLMs need to inhibit responses to events unknown to characters, because the absence of event hiding exposes LLMs to these events throughout reasoning. To address this challenge, we hypothesize and empirically verify that LLMs can achieve such inhibition if a character’s lack of knowledge about events is made explicit during reasoning. Based on this finding, we introduce PICTURE, a new prompting method that enables LLMs to generate a character’s lack of knowledge within free-form Chain-of-Thought (CoT). Experimental results show that PICTURE outperforms existing prompting methods by an average of 7.3% on false-belief tasks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become the standard paradigm for enhancing reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models, yet on-policy algorithms like GRPO suffer from sample inefficiency. Current experience replay methods for RLVR typically replay correct trajectories to consolidate learned reasoning patterns and accelerate convergence, but overlook the vast failure space. This work investigates how to effectively replay failure trajectories. We find that the high heterogeneity of failures renders random replay ineffective, and that high-value negatives should be both gradient-efficient and structurally proximal to correct solutions. To this end, we propose NexGRPO, which employs mid-confidence gating to filter invalid noise and saturated errors, and utilizes boundary failure sampling to retrieve boundary errors semantically similar to correct solutions for targeted refinement. Extensive experiments on mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that NexGRPO outperforms strong baaselines and achieves improved out-of-distribution generalization.

Abstract:
Keypoint-based action recognition offers robustness to appearance variations and provides privacy-preserving representation. However, existing zero-shot (ZS) approaches largely emphasize human motion while underutilizing contextual information, particularly human–object interactions. Moreover, extending keypoint-based ZS models to few-shot scenarios remains insufficiently explored. We propose Instance-aware Semantic Alignment and Transfer (InsAT), a unified framework for ZS recognition and zero-to-few-shot (Z2F) adaptation that leverages instance-level language descriptions. InsAT aligns textual descriptions of humans, objects, and their interactions with visual representations derived from human and object keypoints, enabling effective transfer of interaction knowledge from seen to unseen action classes. To support Z2F adaptation, we introduce Instance-level Visual Adaptation, a parameter-free mechanism that improves recognition by incorporating instance-level contextual cues without updating model weights. Extensive experiments demonstrate that InsAT substantially outperforms prior keypoint-based ZS methods and achieves competitive performance relative to large vision–language models, while remaining data-efficient and robust.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have largely been driven by aligning visual encoders with pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs). While effective, the geometric nature of this alignment remains under-explored. Existing methods often assume a symmetric interaction between visual and textual modalities, implying that both spaces adapt to each other. In this paper, we challenge this assumption and propose the "Text Space as Anchor" hypothesis. We argue that the semantic space of LLMs is rigid, anisotropic, and dominant; thus, effective cross-modal alignment may be an asymmetric projection of visual features onto this pre-existing text manifold without distorting it. We identify a potential issue in current parameter-efficient tuning paradigms where task-specific visual adjustments inadvertently disrupt the projector’s geometry, leading to "catastrophic forgetting" of the alignment mechanism itself. To address this, we introduce Anchor-Preserving Projection (APP), a novel method that regularizes the projector to maintain the geometric structure of the text embedding space via spectral filtering. Extensive experiments on 8 diverse cross-modal tasks and 3 pure language benchmarks demonstrate that APP preserves the LLM’s inherent linguistic capabilities (e.g., MMLU, GSM8K) and reduces object hallucination significantly better than standard fine-tuning methods. We release our code.

Abstract:
Knowledge Bases (KBs) play a key role in various applications. As two representative KB-related tasks, knowledge base completion (KBC) and knowledge base question answering (KBQA) are closely related and inherently complementary with each other. Thus, it will be beneficial to solve the task of joint KBC and KBQA to make them reinforce each other. However, existing studies usually rely on the small language model (SLM) to enhance them jointly, and the large language model (LLM)’s strong reasoning ability is ignored. In this paper, by combining the strengths of the LLM with the SLM, we propose a novel framework JCQL, which can make these two tasks enhance each other in an iterative manner. To make KBC enhance KBQA, we augment the LLM agent-based KBQA model’s reasoning paths by incorporating an SLM-trained KBC model as an action of the agent, alleviating the LLM’s hallucination and high computational costs issue in KBQA. To make KBQA enhance KBC, we incrementally fine-tune the KBC model by leveraging KBQA’s reasoning paths as its supplementary training data, improving the ability of the SLM in KBC. Extensive experiments over two public benchmark data sets demonstrate that JCQL surpasses all baselines for both KBC and KBQA tasks.

Abstract:
Function calling empowers large language models (LLMs) to interface with external tools, yet existing RL-based approaches suffer from misalignment between reasoning processes and tool-call decisions. We propose R2IF, a reasoning-aware RL framework for interpretable function calling, adopting a composite reward integrating format/correctness constraints, Chain-of-Thought Effectiveness Reward (CER), and Specification-Modification-Value (SMV) reward, optimized via GRPO. Experiments on BFCL/ACEBench show R2IF outperforms baselines by up to 34.62% (Llama3.2-3B on BFCL) with positive Average CoT Effectiveness (0.05 for Llama3.2-3B), enhancing both function-calling accuracy and interpretability for reliable tool-augmented LLM deployment.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to incorporate external knowledge at inference. Graph-based RAG extends this by organizing corpora into knowledge graphs, improving multi-hop reasoning and offering a global understanding of the corpus. However, triplet-based graphs generated by LLMs are often fragmented and sparsely connected, which reduces coherence and hinders reasoning. Prior enrichment methods such as clustering, community detection, or approximate graph algorithms attempt to restore connectivity but incur high computational cost and risk semantic distortion. To address these issues, we propose TH-RAG, a hierarchical framework that organizes triplets into subtopics and topics, enhancing connectivity, integrating dispersed information, and supporting robust multi-hop reasoning. Experiments on abstractive and specific QA benchmarks show that TH-RAG outperforms strong baselines in accuracy and robustness while remaining efficient, providing a scalable foundation for graph-based RAG.

Abstract:
Temporal knowledge graph (TKG) forecasting requires predicting future facts by jointly modeling structural dependencies within each snapshot and temporal evolution across snapshots. However, most existing methods are stateless: they recompute entity representations at each timestamp from a limited query window, leading to episodic amnesia and rapid decay of long-term dependencies. To address this limitation, we propose Entity State Tuning (EST), an encoder-agnostic framework that endows TKG forecasters with persistent and continuously evolving entity states. EST maintains a global state buffer and progressively aligns structural evidence with sequential signals via a closed-loop design. Specifically, a topology-aware state perceiver first injects entity-state priors into structural encoding. Then, a unified temporal context module aggregates the state-enhanced events with a pluggable sequence backbone. Subsequently, a dual-track evolution mechanism writes the updated context back to the global entity state memory, balancing plasticity against stability. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that EST consistently improves diverse backbones and achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting the importance of state persistence for long-horizon TKG forecasting.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in multimodal tasks, yet their reliability is persistently undermined by hallucinations—generating text that contradicts visual input. Recent studies often attribute these errors to inadequate visual attention. In this work, we analyze the attention mechanisms via the logit lens, uncovering a distinct anomaly we term Vocabulary Hijacking. We discover that specific visual tokens, defined as Inert Tokens, disproportionately attract attention. Crucially, when their intermediate hidden states are projected into the vocabulary space, they consistently decode to a fixed set of unrelated words (termed Hijacking Anchors) across layers, revealing a rigid semantic collapse. Leveraging this semantic rigidity, we propose Hijacking Anchor-Based Identification (HABI), a robust strategy to accurately localize these Inert Tokens. To quantify the impact of this phenomenon, we introduce the Non-Hijacked Visual Attention Ratio (NHAR), a novel metric designed to identify attention heads that remain resilient to hijacking and are critical for factual accuracy. Building on these insights, we propose Hijacking-Aware Visual Attention Enhancement (HAVAE), a training-free intervention that selectively strengthens the focus of these identified heads on salient visual content. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that HAVAE significantly mitigates hallucinations with no additional computational overhead, while preserving the model’s general capabilities.

Abstract:
Mathematical reasoning is one of the core capabilities for Large Language Models (LLMs). Yet, existing approaches often rely on static heuristics or pre-determined reasoning strategies, limiting their ability to adapt to different intermediate states. To address this limitation, we propose FLAIR (Fuzzy-Logic-AssIsted Reasoner), an adaptive framework that integrates fuzzy theory into LLM-based mathematical reasoning. Specifically, FLAIR characterizes intermediate problem-solving states using fuzzy memberships and employs a parameterized fuzzy rule system to conditionally activate subsequent actions. These rule parameters are further adjusted via Reinforcement Learning using solution-level feedback as the reward signal, enabling adaptive and iterative refinement without reliance on a fixed strategy. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to integrate fuzzy theory into LLM-based mathematical reasoning. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that FLAIR consistently outperforms recent state-of-the-art baselines, while offering effective and interpretable diagnostics of intermediate problem-solving states.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle with multi-step logical reasoning. Existing approaches either purely refine the reasoning chain in natural language form or attach a symbolic solver as an external module. In this work, we instead ask whether LLMs contain a shared internal logical subspace that simultaneously aligns natural-language and symbolic-language views of the reasoning process. Our hypothesis is that this logical subspace captures logical reasoning capabilities in LLMs that are shared across views while remaining independent of surface forms. To verify this, we employ Canonical Correlation Analysis on the paired residual activations from natural-language and symbolic-language reasoning chains, learning a low-dimensional subspace with maximum cross-view correlation. Furthermore, we design a training-free approach that steers LLMs reasoning chain along this logical subspace, thereby leveraging the complementary reasoning signals from both views. Experiments on four logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, improving accuracy by up to 11 percentage points and generalizing well on out-of-domain problems.

Abstract:
We present HowToNarrate, the first general-domain benchmark for Synchronized Video Narration. The benchmark contains 3.2K videos across seven domains, segmented into 37.5K clips with aligned narrations and associated external knowledge. Effective narration requires models to understand visual scenes, incorporate relevant knowledge, and produce coherent, length-appropriate descriptions. We systematically benchmark current Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) on these abilities. Our analysis shows that existing MLLMs overemphasize knowledge retrieval while largely neglecting prior context (receiving less than 10% attention). Moreover, they often conflate narration context with external knowledge, leading to redundancy and incoherence. To mitigate these issues, we propose VideoNarrationAgent, a multi-agent framework that combines context compression, knowledge retrieval, and narration generation. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly improves MLLM performance. Furthermore, instruction tuning on HowToNarrate enhances both context-awareness and length control, boosting Qwen2.5-VL’s score from 25 to 84. We will release all data and code to support future research in synchronized video narration.

Abstract:
The intonational structure of Seoul Korean has been defined with discrete tonal categories within the Autosegmental-Metrical model of intonational phonology. However, it is challenging to map continuous F 0 contours to these invariant categories due to variable F 0 realizations in real-world speech. Our paper proposes Dual-Glob, a deep supervised contrastive learning framework to robustly classify fine-grained pitch accent patterns in Seoul Korean. Unlike conventional local predictive models, our approach captures holistic F 0 contour shapes by enforcing structural consistency between clean and augmented views in a shared latent space. To this aim, we introduce the first large-scale benchmark dataset, consisting of manually annotated 10,093 Accentual Phrases in Seoul Korean. Experimental results show that our Dual-Glob significantly outperforms strong baseline models with state-of-the-art accuracy (77.75%) and F1-score (51.54%). Therefore, our work supports AM-based intonational phonology using data-driven methodology, showing that deep contrastive learning effectively captures holistic structural features of continuous F 0 contours.

Abstract:
Despite achieving high accuracy on medical benchmarks, LLMs exhibit the Einstellung Effect in clinical diagnosis—relying on statistical shortcuts rather than patient-specific evidence, causing misdiagnosis in atypical cases. Existing benchmarks fail to detect this critical failure mode. We introduce MedEinst, a counterfactual benchmark with 5,383 paired clinical cases across 49 diseases. Each pair contains a control case and a "trap" case with altered discriminative evidence that flips the diagnosis. We measure susceptibility via Bias Trap Rate—probability of misdiagnosing traps despite correctly diagnosing controls. Evaluation shows frontier models achieve high baseline accuracy but severe bias trap rates. Thus, we propose ECR-Agent, aligning LLM reasoning with Evidence-Based Medicine via two components: (1) Dynamic Causal Inference (DCI) performs structured reasoning through dual-pathway perception, dynamic causal graph reasoning across three levels (association, intervention, counterfactual), and evidence audit for final diagnosis; (2) Critic-Driven Graph Memory Evolution (CGME) iteratively refines the system by storing validated reasoning paths in an exemplar base and consolidating disease-specific knowledge into evolving illness graphs. Source code is to be released.

Abstract:
Precise spatial reasoning is fundamental to embodied intelligence, yet current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain bottlenecked by text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) that relies solely on textual reasoning trajectories, often bypassing active engagement with fine-grained visual details. To address this, we present E-ViC (Embodied Visual Chain), a framework that moves reasoning beyond text and directly into the visual domain. By formulating visual operations (e.g., zooming, marking) as executable primitives, E-ViC transforms perception from static prediction into an active verification process. Distinct from approaches relying on supervised step-wise trajectories, E-ViC is trained via an agentic reinforcement learning paradigm. This enables the model to autonomously discover optimal policies, leading to the emergence of human-like “look-and-confirm” strategies driven solely by task-level rewards. To facilitate this, we curate a comprehensive 24.4K-sample dataset covering diverse embodied tasks. By grounding reasoning in pixel-level interactions, E-ViC reframes spatial intelligence as a verifiable, tool-using capability. Extensive evaluations on external benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms strong VLM baselines with an average gain of 10.1%.

Abstract:
The evaluation of navigation instructions remains a persistent challenge in Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) research. Traditional reference-based metrics such as BLEU and ROUGE fail to capture the functional utility of spatial directives, specifically whether an instruction successfully guides a navigator to the intended destination. Although existing VLN agents could serve as evaluators, their reliance on high-fidelity visual simulators introduces licensing constraints and computational costs, and perception errors further confound linguistic quality assessment. This paper introduces GROKE (Graph-based Reasoning over OSM Knowledge for instruction Evaluation), a vision-free training-free hierarchical LLM-based framework for evaluating navigation instructions using OpenStreetMap data. Through systematic ablation studies, we demonstrate that structured JSON and textual formats for spatial information substantially outperform grid-based and visual graph representations. Our hierarchical architecture combines sub-instruction planning with topological graph navigation, reducing navigation error by 68.5% compared to heuristic and sampling baselines on the Map2Seq dataset. The agent’s execution success, trajectory fidelity, and decision patterns serve as proxy metrics for functional navigability given OSM-visible landmarks and topology, establishing a scalable and interpretable evaluation paradigm without visual dependencies.

Abstract:
Existing Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) algorithms, such as GRPO, rely on rigid, uniform, and symmetric trust region mechanisms that are fundamentally misaligned with the complex optimization dynamics of Large Language Models (LLMs). In this paper, we identify three critical challenges in these methods: (1) inefficient gradient utilization caused by the binary cutoff of hard clipping, (2) insensitive probability mass arising from uniform ratio constraints that ignore the token distribution, and (3) asymmetric signal reliability stemming from the disparate credit assignment ambiguity between positive and negative samples. To bridge these gaps, we propose Mass-Adaptive Soft Policy Optimization (MASPO), a unified framework designed to harmonize these three dimensions. MASPO integrates a differentiable soft Gaussian gating to maximize gradient utility, a mass-adaptive limiter to balance exploration across the probability spectrum, and an asymmetric risk controller to align update magnitudes with signal confidence. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MASPO serves as a robust, all-in-one RLVR solution, significantly outperforming baselines. Our code is available at: https://github.com/FlyTune/MASPO-RL.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in code generation across various domains. However, their ability to replicate complex, multi-panel visualizations from real-world data remains largely unassessed. To address this gap, we introduce RealChart2Code , a new large-scale benchmark with over 2,800 instances grounded in authentic datasets and featuring tasks with clear analytical intent. Crucially, it is the first benchmark to systematically evaluate chart generation from large-scale raw data and assess iterative code refinement in a multi-turn conversational setting. Our comprehensive evaluation of 14 leading VLMs on RealChart2Code reveals significant performance degradation compared to simpler benchmarks, highlighting their struggles with complex plot structures and authentic data. Our analysis uncovers a substantial performance gap between proprietary and open-weight models and confirms that even state-of-the-art VLMs often fail to accurately replicate intricate, multi-panel charts. These findings provide valuable insights into the current limitations of VLMs and guide future research directions.

Abstract:
This study investigates how different moral conditions influence the general problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). We aim to explore whether the role of morality as a cognitive function operating in human decision-making can be extended to LLMs. Specifically, we define distinct moral stages based on Kohlberg’s theory of moral development and design prompts to elicit model responses aligned with each corresponding condition. The validity of this alignment is verified using the Defining Issues Test, a human evaluation tool. Subsequently, models reflecting the characteristics of each condition are evaluated using the MMLU benchmark, which requires general problem-solving abilities across various domains. Experimental results show that different moral perspectives lead to changes in the model’s decision-making during general reasoning, reflected in both responses and internal representations. Notably, conditions grounded in more advanced moral stages tend to elicit more thoughtful and reflective problem-solving behavior, which is often associated with enhanced performance. Our study attempts to broaden the concept of LLM morality, which has traditionally only been considered in ethical judgment scenarios. Furthermore, it emphasizes that morality is not merely a means of ensuring safety but a crucial factor that shapes a model’s behavior and thought processes.

Abstract:
Cross-lingual learning enables the transfer of structured sentiment knowledge from high-resource languages to unlabeled or low-resource languages, but prior work has largely focused on coarse-grained sentiment classification or aspect extraction. In contrast, zero-shot cross-lingual aspect–opinion–sentiment triplet extraction (ASTE), which extracts sentiment triplets of the form ( aspect term , opinion term , sentiment polarity ) , remains underexplored. We propose a unified framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) as both structured pseudo-label generators and semantic teachers for ASTE. Our approach employs stepwise structured prompting over aspect- and opinion-aware code-switched variants to generate reliable pseudo triplets, followed by a multi-variant consistency filter to retain high-confidence supervision. We further introduce a triplet-aware contrastive distillation objective that aligns student triplet representations with LLM-encoded semantic embeddings. During inference, only the student ASTE model is used, without requiring LLM access. Experiments on four non-Indic and four low-resource Indic target languages show consistent improvements over strong cross-lingual and LLM-based baselines. The proposed method yields an absolute micro-F1 improvement of 5.3 points on non-Indic languages and 3.8 points on low-resource Indic languages compared to the best competing approach. Ablation results further validate the complementary roles of aspect- and opinion-aware code-switched prompting and triplet-aware contrastive distillation, with larger relative gains observed in low-resource Indic settings.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are making rapid strides in complex visual reasoning. This survey synthesizes the emerging paradigm of Image-Grounded Chain-of-Thought (IG-CoT), where models ground intermediate inferences by interleaving textual rationales with visual state updates. We formalize IG-CoT, present a method-centric taxonomy covering prompting, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning, and map these techniques to representative benchmarks. Our analysis identifies two domains where IG-CoT offers significant advantages: detail-oriented reasoning requiring meticulous perception, and imagined-world reasoning for simulating unseen states in games, geometry, and planning. We discuss the practical trade-offs of current methods regarding controllability, data, and compute. We conclude by highlighting key challenges (efficiency, data quality, and generative capabilities) and outlining promising future directions, including lightweight architectures, richer intermediate supervision, and method-aware evaluations that better assess faithfulness and long-horizon reasoning. We maintain a continuously updated paper list at https://github.com/dddraxxx/Awesome-Image-Grounded-CoT.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to scientific research, yet existing evaluations often fail to reflect the fine-grained capabilities required in practice. Most benchmarks are manually curated or domain-generic, limiting scalability and alignment with real scientific use cases. In this paper, we propose a new framework named SciCustom to address the problem. It enables the custom construction of benchmarks from large-scale scientific data to evaluate application-specific scientific capabilities in LLMs. SciCustom first organizes scientific knowledge into ontology-grounded knowledge units with controlled granularity and trains a tagger to map large-scale data instances into this knowledge space. Given a custom requirement, relevant knowledge units are identified via voting-based multi-model consensus. These units enable relevance-aware benchmark retrieval via binary search, followed by proxy subset selection and data-grounded benchmark generation for efficient evaluation. Experiments in chemistry and healthcare demonstrate that SciCustom reveals fine-grained differences in LLM scientific capabilities that standard benchmarks overlook, while requiring neither expert annotation nor synthetic question generation. This work provides a scalable and application-aware foundation for benchmarking scientific capabilities in LLMs.

Abstract:
Despite the success of large language models (LLMs) on general-purpose tasks, their performance in highly specialized domains such as biomedicine remains unsatisfactory. A key limitation is the inability of LLMs to effectively leverage biomedical tools, which clinical experts and biomedical researchers rely on extensively in daily workflows. While recent general-domain tool-calling datasets have substantially improved the capabilities of LLM agents, existing efforts in the biomedical domain largely rely on in-context learning and restrict models to a small set of tools. To address this gap, we introduce BioTool, a comprehensive biomedical tool-calling dataset designed for fine-tuning LLMs. BioTool comprises 34 frequently used tools collected from the NCBI, Ensembl, and UniProt databases, along with 7,040 high-quality, human-verified query–API call pairs spanning variation, genomics, proteomics, evolution, and general biology. Fine-tuning a 4-billion-parameter LLM on BioTool yields substantial improvements in biomedical tool-calling performance, outperforming cutting-edge commercial LLMs such as GPT-5.1. Furthermore, human expert evaluations demonstrate that integrating a BioTool-fine-tuned tool caller significantly improves downstream answer quality compared to the same LLM without tool usage, highlighting the effectiveness of BioTool in enhancing the biomedical capabilities of LLMs. The full dataset and evaluation code are available at https://github.com/gxx27/BioTool.

Abstract:
Task oriented dialog systems often rely on static exploration strategies that do not adapt to dynamic dialog contexts, leading to inefficient exploration and suboptimal performance. We propose DyBBT, a novel dialog policy learning framework that formalizes the exploration challenge through a structured cognitive state space 𝒞 that captures dialog progression, user uncertainty, and slot dependency. DyBBT proposes a bandit-inspired meta-controller that dynamically switches between a fast intuitive inference (System 1) and a slow deliberative reasoner (System 2) based on real-time cognitive states and visitation counts. Extensive experiments on single- and multi-domain benchmarks show that DyBBT achieves SOTA performance in success rate, efficiency, and generalization, with human evaluations confirming that its decisions are well-aligned with expert judgment.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved impressive progress in multimodal mathematical reasoning. Yet, howmuch visual information truly contributes to reasoning remains unclear. Existing benchmarks report strong overall performance but seldom isolate the role of the image modality, leaving open whether VLMs genuinely leverage visual understanding or merely depend on linguistic priors. To address this, we present MathSight, a university-level multimodal mathematical reasoning benchmark designed to disentangle and quantify the effect of visual input. Each problem includes multiple visual variants—original, hand-drawn, photocaptured—and a text-only condition for controlled comparison. Experiments on state-of-the-art VLMs reveal a consistent trend: the contribution of visual information diminishes with increasing problem difficulty. Remarkably, Qwen3-VL without any image input surpasses both its multimodal variants and GPT-5, underscoring the need for benchmarks like MathSight to advance genuine vision-grounded reasoning in future models. The project page is available at https://cnu-bot-group.github.io/MathSight/.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) with long chain-of-thought reasoning have recently achieved remarkable success. Yet, equipping domain-specialized models with such reasoning capabilities, referred to as "Reasoning + X", remains a significant challenge. While model merging offers a promising training-free solution, existing methods often suffer from a destructive performance collapse: existing methods tend to both weaken reasoning depth and compromise domain-specific utility. Interestingly, we identify a counter-intuitive phenomenon underlying this failure: reasoning ability predominantly resides in parameter regions with low gradient sensitivity, contrary to the common assumption that domain capabilities correspond to high-magnitude parameters . Motivated by this insight, we propose ReasonAny , a novel merging framework that resolves the reasoning–domain performance collapse through Contrastive Gradient Identification. Experiments across safety, biomedicine, and finance domains show that ReasonAny effectively synthesizes "Reasoning + X" capabilities, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines while retaining robust reasoning performance.

Abstract:
How can we share parameters within large language models to significantly reduce memory costs while preserving accuracy? While parameter sharing is a promising solution to the memory overhead of large language models, existing methods rely on naive grouping and fail to correct sharing-induced discrepancies. We propose an accurate and efficient parameter sharing framework, SharVeT (Similarity-aware sharing with Vector-based Tuning), which performs similarity-based grouping to ensure accurate sharing, allocates parameters adaptively to preserve diversity within each group, and applies lightweight refinement with knowledge distillation to correct sharing-induced discrepancies. Experiments show that SharVeT outperforms existing sharing methods, achieving up to 32.1% lower perplexity and 23.3% higher few-shot reasoning accuracy.

Abstract:
This paper narrows the performance gap between small, specialized models and significantly larger general-purpose models through domain adaptation via continual pre-training and merging. We address the scarcity of specialized non-English data by constructing a high-quality German medical corpus (FineMed-de) from FineWeb2. This corpus is used to continually pre-train and merge three well-known LLMs (ranging from 7B to 24B parameters), creating the DeFineMed model family. A comprehensive evaluation confirms that specialization dramatically enhances 7B model performance on German medical benchmarks. Furthermore, the pairwise win-rate analysis of the Qwen2.5-based models demonstrates an approximately 3.5-fold increase in the win-rate against the much larger Mistral-Small-24B-Instruct through domain adaptation. This evidence positions specialized 7B models as a competitive, resource-efficient solution for complex medical instruction-following tasks. While model merging successfully restores instruction-following abilities, a subsequent failure mode analysis reveals inherent trade-offs, including the introduction of language mixing and increased verbosity, highlighting the need for more targeted fine-tuning in future work. This research provides a robust, compliant methodology for developing specialized LLMs, serving as the foundation for practical use in German-speaking healthcare contexts.

Abstract:
We introduce CAPC-CG, the Chinese Adaptive Policy Communication (Central Government) Corpus, the first open dataset of Chinese policy directives annotated with a five-color typology of policy signals, capturing clarity and ambiguity, grounded in the theory of adaptive policy communication. Spanning 1949–2023, this corpus includes laws, regulations, and rules issued by Chinese central authorities, segmented into 3.3 million paragraph units. We further propose and validate an expert-directed LLM annotation method that integrates codebook design, structured training, a two-step workflow, and LLM-based scaling. Alongside the corpus, we release metadata and a gold-standard labeled set developed by trained coders. Inter-annotator agreement achieves a Fleiss’ kappa of κ = 0.86 on directive labels, indicating high reliability. We provide baseline classification results with several large language models (LLMs), together with our codebook, and describe patterns from the data. This release enables downstream tasks and multilingual NLP research in communication strategies under complexity and uncertainty.

Abstract:
The development of large-scale Visual Question Answering (VQA) datasets has traditionally relied on resource-intensive manual annotation. In addition, most of the existing Arabic VQA datasets focus on culturally-specific and dialect-aware domains. To address these limitations, we propose a new pipeline that leverages Wikipedia template tags to extract the relevant information for each image, which is subsequently utilized by the Large Language Model (LLM) to synthetically generate a new visual question answering dataset. Using this pipeline, we have constructed AraVQA, the most comprehensive Arabic Factoid Visual Question Answering dataset, containing more than 50,000 questions and covering over 20 varied primary subjects within Arabic general knowledge. Our detailed analysis shows that our dataset can serve as a post-training dataset to enhance the performance of existing Visual Language Models (VLMs) on Arabic VQA tasks. Furthermore, we present a novel benchmark, derived from our dataset and validated through manual annotation, that poses more challenges to Arabic VLMs than existing Arabic VQA datasets.

Abstract:
Recent advances in speech large language models (e.g., GPT-4o) have enabled end-to-end spoken interactions, yet their robustness in real-world applications remains unclear, where systems must assist users in completing specific tasks under complex conditions such as multi-turn, ambiguous, and often spontaneous speech, as well as natural alternation between speech and text. Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) offers a realistic scenario to evaluate whether models can effectively help users accomplish such task-oriented goals, but existing benchmarks are mainly text-based, and the few speech datasets are limited to English and often neglect spontaneous disfluencies and speaker diversity. To address this gap, we introduce RealTalk-CN, the first Chinese multi-turn, multi-domain speech–text TOD dataset, containing 5.4k dialogues (60K turns, ~150 hours) of real human-to-human recordings with detailed annotations for dialogue states, disfluency types, and speaker characteristics. Based on this dataset, we propose a cross-modal interaction task supporting dynamic speech-text switching and a comprehensive evaluation protocol assessing robustness to disfluencies, sensitivity to speaker variation, and cross-domain generalization. Experiments on state-of-the-art models demonstrate the challenges posed by RealTalk-CN and establish its value as a benchmark for developing reliable and fair Speech LLMs in real-world deployments. The dataset and evaluation framework are available to encourage further research.

Abstract:
Users frequently express their beliefs to large language models (LLMs). In some situations, the LLM should accept these contextual beliefs as true. In others, they should stick to their prior knowledge. Notably, users’ expressions of belief (EoBs) can take linguistically diverse forms—using presuppositions, evidential and certainty markers, or varied tones—each of which may have a different persuasiveness over the LLMs. We introduce a typology to systematically evaluate how different EoBs affect whether models follow context versus prior knowledge. The typology is grounded in four linguistically motivated dimensions: form, evidentiality, epistemic stance, and tone, spanning 17 fine-grained types. By pairing these EoBs with world knowledge facts, we generate controlled EoB–query pairs that isolate the effect of linguistic variation. Using this benchmark, we evaluate 16 LLMs that differ in architecture (Llama3, Qwen3, Gemma3), scale (1B-30B parameters), and training stages (base vs instruct). We identify meaningful variations in response behavior across these axes, e.g., that bigger models and instruction models tend to be less context–following than smaller models and base models. We further identify specific EoBs that statistically significantly persuade LMs more consistently than others. Our work reveals systematic patterns in how linguistic framing affects LLM context integration, with implications for prompt engineering and model robustness.

Abstract:
Diffusion language models (DLMs) are emerging as a compelling alternative to the dominant autoregressive paradigm, offering inherent advantages in parallel generation and bidirectional context modeling. However, for the tasks with strict structural constraints such as code generation, DLMs face a critical trade-off between inference speed and output quality, where accelerating generation by reducing sampling steps often leads to catastrophic performance collapse.We find that the fundamental reasons are: 1) the generation difficulty is uneven in the structured sequence decoding steps, making DLM’s static acceleration strategy suboptimal; 2) the context of tokens generated by DLM evolves continuously, causing early high-confidence predictions to turn into irreversible errors.In this paper, we introduce efficient Sampling with Adaptive acceleration and Backtracking Enhanced Remasking (i.e., Saber), a novel training-free sampling algorithm for DLMs that the first to improve both inference speed and output quality in code generation. Saber dynamically adjusts the number of tokens unmasked per step based on the model’s evolving confidence, and utilizes a backtracking mechanism to revert tokens whose confidence drops as new context emerges, with its effectiveness supported by theoretical analysis.Extensive experiments on multiple mainstream code generation benchmarks show that Saber boosts Pass@1 accuracy by an average of 1.9% over mainstream DLM sampling methods, while achieving an average 251.4% inference speedup. By leveraging the inherent advantages of DLMs, our work significantly narrows the performance gap with autoregressive models in code generation.

Abstract:
Accurate comprehension and controllable generation of emotion and rhetoric are pivotal for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Existing studies mostly rely on external optimizations, lacking in-depth exploration of internal representation mechanisms, thus failing to achieve fine-grained steering at the neuron level. A handful of works on neurons are confined to emotions, neglecting rhetoric neurons and their intrinsic connections. Traditional neuron masking also exhibits counterintuitive phenomena, making reliable verification of neuron functionality infeasible. To address these issues, we systematically investigate the neurons representation mechanisms and inherent associations of 6 emotion categories and 4 core rhetorical devices. We propose a neuron identification framework that integrates multi-dimensional screening, and design an adaptive masking method incorporating dynamic filtering, attenuation masking, and feedback optimization, enabling reliable functional validation of neuron functionality. Through neuron regulation, we achieve directed induction of non-target sentences and enhancement of emotion tasks via rhetoric neurons. Experiments on 5 commonly used datasets validate the effectiveness of our method, providing a novel paradigm for the fine-grained steering of emotion and rhetoric expressions in LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly multilingual, yet open models continue to underperform relative to proprietary systems, with the gap most pronounced for African languages. Continued pre-training (CPT) offers a practical route to language adaptation, but improvements on demanding capabilities such as mathematical reasoning often remain limited. This limitation is driven in part by the uneven domain coverage and missing task-relevant knowledge that characterize many low-resource language corpora. We present AfriqueLLM, a suite of open LLMs adapted to 20 African languages through CPT on 26B tokens. We perform a comprehensive empirical study across five base models spanning sizes and architectures, including Llama 3.1, Gemma 3, and Qwen 3, and systematically analyze how CPT data composition shapes downstream performance. In particular, we vary mixtures that include math, code, and synthetic translated data, and evaluate the resulting models on a range of multilingual benchmarks. Our results identify data composition as the primary driver of CPT gains. Adding math, code, and synthetic translated data yields consistent improvements, including on reasoning-oriented evaluations. Within a fixed architecture, larger models typically improve performance, but architectural choices dominate scale when comparing across model families. Moreover, strong multilingual performance in the base model does not reliably predict post-CPT outcomes; robust architectures coupled with task-aligned data provide a more dependable recipe. Finally, our best models improve long-context performance, including document-level translation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to factual hallucinations, risking their reliability in real-world applications. Existing hallucination detectors mainly extract micro-level intrinsic patterns for uncertainty quantification or elicit macro-level self-judgments through verbalized prompts. However, these methods address only a single facet of the hallucination, focusing either on implicit neural uncertainty or explicit symbolic reasoning, thereby treating these inherently coupled behaviors in isolation and failing to exploit their interdependence for a holistic view. In this paper, we propose LaaB (Logical Consistency-as-a-Bridge), a framework that bridges neural features and symbolic judgments for hallucination detection. LaaB introduces a "meta-judgment" process to map symbolic labels back into the feature space. By leveraging the inherent logical bridge where response and meta-judgment labels are either the same or opposite based on the self-judgment’s semantics, LaaB aligns and integrates dual-view signals via mutual learning and enhances the hallucination detection. Extensive experiments on 4 public datasets, across 4 LLMs, against 8 baselines demonstrate the superiority of LaaB.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) can exhibit step-by-step reasoning, reflection, and backtracking, but these behaviors are often unregulated, leading to overthinking. As a result, LRMs continue generating redundant reasoning even after reaching high-confidence conclusions. This increases inference cost and latency, limiting practical deployment. The root cause is the absence of an intrinsic mechanism to monitor the reasoning state and decide when to continue, backtrack, or stop. We propose MERA, a meta-cognitive reasoning framework that decouples reasoning from control to enable independent optimization of control strategies. MERA constructs high-quality reasoning–control supervision data via a takeover-based pipeline, and transforms long-horizon traces into structured reasoning–control alternating sequences for training. The model is trained with supervised fine-tuning to internalize the structured separation, and further optimized with Control-Segment Policy Optimization (CSPO), which combines segment-wise GRPO with control masking to focus learning on control segments. Experiments across reasoning benchmarks show that MERA improves both efficiency and accuracy.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly deployed for complex, tool-based tasks where long-term memory is critical to driving actions. Existing benchmarks, however, primarily test an agent’s ability to passively retrieve isolated facts in response to explicit questions. They fail to evaluate the more crucial capability of actively applying memory to execute tasks. To address this gap, we introduce Mem2ActBench, a benchmark for evaluating whether agents can proactively leverage long-term memory to execute tool-based actions by selecting appropriate tools and grounding their parameters. The benchmark simulates persistent assistant usage, where users mention the same topic across long, interrupted interactions and expect previously established preferences and task states to be implicitly applied. We build the dataset with an automated pipeline that merges heterogeneous sources (ToolACE, BFCL, OASST1), resolves conflicts via consistency modeling, and synthesizes 2,029 sessions with 12 user–assistant–tool turns on average. From these memory chains, a reverse-generation method produces 400 tool-use tasks, with human evaluation confirming 91.3% are strongly memory-dependent. Experiments on seven memory frameworks show that current systems remain inadequate at actively utilizing memory for parameter grounding, highlighting the need for more effective approaches to evaluate and improve memory application in task execution. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Cantaloupe-M/Mem2ActBench.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved high accuracy on complex commonsense and mathematical problems that involve the composition of multiple reasoning steps. However, current compositional benchmarks testing these skills tend to focus on either commonsense or math reasoning, whereas LLM agents solving real-world tasks would require a combination of both. In this work, we introduce an Agentic Commonsense and Math benchmark (AgentCoMa), where each compositional task requires a commonsense reasoning step and a math reasoning step. We test it on 61 LLMs of different sizes, model families, and training strategies. We find that LLMs can usually solve both steps in isolation, yet their accuracy drops by nearly 30% on average when the two are combined. This is a substantially greater performance gap than the one we observe in prior compositional benchmarks that combine multiple steps of the same reasoning type. In contrast, non-expert human annotators can solve the compositional questions and the individual steps in AgentCoMa with similarly high accuracy. Furthermore, we conduct a series of interpretability studies to better understand the performance gap, examining neuron patterns, attention maps and membership inference. Our work underscores a substantial degree of model brittleness in the context of mixed-type compositional reasoning and offers a test bed for future improvement.

Abstract:
Amidst the rapid advances of large language models (LLMs), most LLMs still struggle with mixed-language inputs, limited Code-switching (CSW) datasets, and evaluation biases, which hinder their deployment in multilingual societies. This survey provides the first comprehensive analysis of CSW-aware LLM research, reviewing 327 studies spanning five research areas, 15+ NLP tasks, 30+ datasets, and 80+ languages. We classify recent advances by architecture, training strategy, and evaluation methodology, outlining how LLMs have reshaped CSW modelling and what challenges persist. The paper concludes with a roadmap emphasizing the need for inclusive datasets, fair evaluation, and linguistically grounded models to achieve truly multilingual intelligence. A curated collection of all resources is maintained at https://github.com/lingo-iitgn/awesome-code-mixing/.

Abstract:
Existing adaptive learning systems struggle to simultaneously achieve deep personalization, dynamic adaptability, and content trustworthiness, particularly in logically rigorous STEM fields where Large Language Models (LLMs) are prone to "hallucination". This paper introduces LearnerCoMPASS (Cognitive Multi-model Planning Adaptive System), an integrated, end-to-end framework for adaptive learning. At its core, the framework features a novel multi-model path planning algorithm that orchestrates and fuses the outputs of heterogeneous LLM experts to generate and optimize learning sequences. To enable deep personalization, we design a dynamic cognitive diagnosis module that employs an innovative encoder-decoder architecture to generate precise, multi-dimensional cognitive state vectors for learners. To ensure trustworthiness, the system leverages an adaptively constructed dynamic knowledge graph and a Graph-RAG mechanism to provide factual anchors and logical constraints for LLM reasoning, thereby mitigating hallucinations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LearnerCoMPASS significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in generating high-quality personalized learning paths. Furthermore, ablation studies validate the critical contributions of our dynamic cognitive diagnosis and multi-model planning components.

Abstract:
Visual token pruning methods effectively mitigate the quadratic computational growth caused by processing high-resolution images and video frames in vision-language models (VLMs). However, existing approaches rely on predefined pruning configurations without determining whether they achieve computation-performance optimality. In this work, we introduce , a novel framework that formulates visual token pruning as a Pareto configuration optimization problem to automatically identify optimal configurations. Our approach employs continuous relaxation and straight-through estimators to enable gradient-based search, solved via the Augmented Lagrangian method. Extensive experiments across 8 visual benchmarks demonstrate that effectively approximates the empirical Pareto frontier obtained through grid search and generalizes well across various pruning methods and VLM architectures. Furthermore, through learnable kernel functions, we investigate layer-wise pruning patterns and reveal that multi-step progressive pruning captures VLMs’ hierarchical compression structure, achieving superior accuracy-efficiency trade-offs compared to single-layer approaches.

Abstract:
Evaluating LLMs’ instruction-following ability in multi-topic dialogues is essential yet challenging. Existing benchmarks are limited to a fixed number of turns, susceptible to saturation and failing to account for users’ interactive experience. In this work, we propose a novel framework featuring a three-layer tracking mechanism and a query synthesis agent to mimic sequential user behaviors. Grounded in Flow Theory, we introduce process-centric metrics and terminate a conversational evaluation only upon exhausting user patience. Leveraging this framework, we present EvolIF, an evolving benchmark covering 12 constraint groups. Our analysis reveals deficiencies in failure recovery and fine-grained instruction following, with performance stratification becoming evident as conversational depth increases. GPT-5 demonstrates the most sustained resilience, maintaining a 66.40% stability score, outperforming Gemini-3-Pro by 5.59%, while other models lag behind.

Abstract:
Text Image Machine Translation (TIMT)—the task of translating textual content embedded in images—is critical for applications in accessibility, cross-lingual information access, and real-world document understanding. However, TIMT remains a complex challenge due to the need for accurate optical character recognition (OCR), robust visual-text reasoning, and high-quality translation, often requiring cascading multi-stage pipelines. Recent advances in large-scale Reinforcement Learning (RL) have improved reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), but their application to end-to-end TIMT is still underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce MT 3 , a novel Multi-Task RL framework to specialize MLLMs into end-to-end expert TIMT models. MT 3 adopts a synergistic multi-task optimization paradigm targeting three key sub-skills: text recognition, context-aware reasoning, and translation. It is trained using a novel multi-mixed reward mechanism that provides fine-grained feedback, fostering a controllable and transparent optimization process. Furthermore, to facilitate the evaluation of TIMT in authentic cross-cultural and real-world social media contexts, we introduced XHSPost, the first social media TIMT benchmark. Our MT 3 -7B-Zero achieves state-of-the-art results on the latest in-domain MIT-10M benchmark, outperforming strong baselines such as Qwen2.5-VL-72B and InternVL2.5-78B by notable margins across multiple metrics. Additionally, the model shows strong generalization to out-of-distribution language pairs and datasets. In-depth analyses reveal how multi-task synergy, reinforcement learning initialization, curriculum design, and reward formulation contribute to advancing MLLM-driven TIMT.

Abstract:
The use of large language models either as decision support systems, or in agentic workflows, is rapidly transforming the digital ecosystem. However, the understanding of LLM decision-making under uncertainty remains limited. We initiate a comparative study of LLM risky choices along two dimensions: (1) prospect representation (explicit vs. experience-based) and (2) decision rationale (explanation). Our study, which involves 20 frontier and open LLMs, is complemented by a matched human subjects experiment, which provides one reference point, while an expected payoff maximizing rational agent model provides another. We find that LLMs cluster into two categories: reasoning models (RMs) and conversational models (CMs). RMs tend towards rational behavior, are insensitive to the order of prospects, gain/loss framing, and explanations, and behave similarly whether prospects are explicit or presented via experience history. CMs are significantly less rational, slightly more human-like, sensitive to prospect ordering, framing, and explanation, and exhibit a large description-history gap. Paired comparisons of open LLMs suggest that a key factor differentiating RMs and CMs is training for mathematical reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs), despite its impressive capabilities across domains, have been shown to be vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Prior backdoor strategies predominantly operate at the token level, where an injected trigger causes the model to generate a specific target word, choice, or class (depending on the task). Recent advances, however, exploit the long-form reasoning tendencies of modern LLMs to conduct reasoning-level backdoors: once triggered, the victim model inserts one or more malicious reasoning steps into its chain-of-thought (CoT). These attacks are substantially harder to detect, as the backdoored answer remains plausible and consistent with the poisoned reasoning trajectory. Yet, defenses tailored to this type of backdoor remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we propose Critical-CoT, a novel defense mechanism that conducts a two-stage fine-tuning (FT) on LLMs to develop critical thinking behaviors, enabling them to automatically identify potential backdoors and refuse to generate malicious reasoning steps. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs and datasets demonstrate that Critical-CoT provides strong robustness against both in-context learning-based and FT-based backdoor attacks. Notably, Critical-CoT exhibits strong cross-domain and cross-task generalization. Our code is available at hthttps://github.com/tuanvu171/Critical-CoT .

Abstract:
Small LLMs often struggle to match the agentic capabilities of large, costly models. While reinforcement learning can help, progress has been limited by two structural bottlenecks: existing open-source agentic training data are narrow in task variety and easily solved; real-world APIs lack diversity and are unstable for large-scale reinforcement learning rollout processes. We address these challenges with SYNTHAGENT, a framework that jointly synthesizes diverse tool-use training data and simulates complete environments. Specifically, a strong teacher model creates novel tasks and tool ecosystems, then rewrites them into intentionally underspecified instructions. This compels agents to actively query users for missing details. When handling synthetic tasks, an LLM-based user simulator provides user-private information, while a mock tool system delivers stable tool responses. For rewards, task-level rubrics are constructed based on required subgoals, user-agent interactions, and forbidden behaviors. Across 14 challenging datasets in math, search, and tool use, models trained on our synthetic data achieve substantial gains, with small models showing performance comparable to some larger baselines in certain domains.

Abstract:
Current evaluations of Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily emphasize task completion, often overlooking resource efficiency and adaptability. This neglects a crucial capability: agents’ ability to devise and adjust cost-optimal plans in response to changing environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce CostBench, a scalable, cost-centric benchmark designed to evaluate agents’ economic reasoning and replanning abilities. Situated in the travel-planning domain, CostBench comprises tasks solvable via multiple sequences of atomic and composite tools with diverse, customizable costs. It also supports four types of dynamic blocking events, such as tool failures and cost changes, to simulate real-world unpredictability and necessitate agents to adapt in real time. Evaluating leading open-sourced and proprietary models on CostBench reveals a substantial gap in cost-aware planning: agents frequently fail to identify cost-optimal solutions in static settings, with even GPT-5 achieving less than 75% exact match rate on the hardest tasks, and performance further drops significantly under dynamic conditions. By diagnosing these weaknesses, CostBench lays the groundwork for developing future agents that are both economically rational and robust.

Abstract:
Reliable failure detection and causal reasoning are critical in robotic manipulation, as their absence risks robot damage and endangers human safety.Although recent Vision–Language Models (VLMs) are employed to attempt failure detection and causality reasoning, they typically make retrospective assessment only after task completion, and their reasoning accuracy is often limited.To address these issues, we introduce RoboFailRing, which enables timely failure detection during task execution and enhances the reasoning accuracy of VLMs.It achieves rapid failure detection by retrieving a pre-constructed failure memory and returning a similarity-based decision.In addition, by providing grounded failure report to VLMs, it improves the accuracy of their reasoning about the failure causes and repair strategies.We evaluate RoboFailRing on two large-scale simulated datasets comprising over 6,000 failure trajectories and covering 81 distinct manipulation tasks.The results show that the average success rate of out-of-distribution failure detection reaches 80%, while the mean detection time is cut to roughly 50% of the baseline.Moreover, evaluations on real-world systems show an average 35% gain in VLM failure-reasoning accuracy.We make our code publicly available at: https://github.com/DynamicPoet/RoboFailRing.

Abstract:
Student mistakes in mathematics are often systematic: a learner applies a coherent but wrong procedure and repeats it across contexts. We introduce MalruleLib, a learning-science-grounded framework that translates documented misconceptions into executable procedures, drawing on 67 learning-science and mathematics education sources, and generates step-by-step traces of malrule-consistent student work. We formalize a core student-modeling problem as Malrule Reasoning Accuracy (MRA): infer a misconception from one worked mistake and predict the student’s next answer under cross-template rephrasing. Across nine language models (4B - 120B), accuracy drops from 66% on direct problem solving to 40% on cross-template misconception prediction. MalruleLib encodes 101 malrules over 498 parameterized problem templates and produces paired dual-path traces for both correct reasoning and malrule-consistent student reasoning. Because malrules are executable and templates are parameterizable, MalruleLib can generate over one million instances, enabling scalable supervision and controlled evaluation. Using MalruleLib, we observe cross-template degradations of 10 - 21%, while providing student step traces improves prediction by 3 - 15%. We release MalruleLib as infrastructure for educational AI that models student procedures across contexts, enabling diagnosis and feedback that targets the underlying misconception.

Abstract:
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting combined with few-shot in-context learning (ICL) has unlocked significant reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs). However, ICL with CoT examples is ineffective on novel tasks when the pre-training knowledge is insufficient. We study this problem in a controlled setting using the CoT-ICL Lab framework, and propose meta-training techniques to learn novel abstract reasoning tasks in-context. Although CoT examples facilitate reasoning, we noticed that their excessive inclusion during meta-training degrades performance when CoT supervision is limited. To mitigate such behavior, we propose CoT-Recipe, a formal approach to modulate the mix of CoT and non-CoT examples in meta-training sequences. We demonstrate that careful modulation via CoT-Recipe can increase the accuracy of transformers on novel tasks by up to 300% even when there are no CoT examples available in-context. We confirm the broader effectiveness of these techniques by applying them to pretrained LLMs (Qwen2.5 series) for symbolic reasoning tasks and observing gains of up to 130% in accuracy.

Abstract:
Multimodal health sensing offers rich behavioral signals for assessing mental health, yet translating these numerical time-series measurements into natural language remains challenging. Current LLMs cannot natively ingest long-duration sensor streams, and paired sensor–text datasets are scarce. To address these challenges, we introduce LENS, a framework that aligns multimodal sensing data with language models to generate clinically grounded mental-health narratives. LENS first constructs a large-scale dataset by transforming Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) responses related to depression and anxiety symptoms into natural-language descriptions, yielding over 100,000 sensor–text QA pairs from 258 participants. To enable native time-series integration, we train a patch-level encoder that projects raw sensor signals directly into an LLM’s representation space. Our results show that LENS outperforms strong baselines on standard NLP metrics and task-specific measures of symptom-severity accuracy. A user study with 13 mental-health professionals further indicates that LENS-produced narratives are comprehensive and clinically meaningful. Ultimately, our approach advances LLMs as interfaces for health sensing, providing a scalable path toward models that can reason over raw behavioral signals and support downstream clinical decision-making.

Abstract:
Long-context summarization is pivotal for extracting core insights from extensive documents. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, they frequently encounter attention dilution and hallucination with lengthy inputs. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) partially mitigates this, but conventional RAG relies on shallow similarity retrieval of fragmented chunks, failing to capture high-level thematic structures and long-range dependencies. Although graph-based RAG approaches have emerged to address these structural limitations, existing solutions, such as Graph of Records (GoR), critically suffer from a fundamental flaw: they paradoxically re-introduce hallucinations by constructing graphs based on unreliable, LLM-generated responses. To overcome these challenges, we introduce Hierarchical Graph of Evidence (HiGoE) (Code link https://github.com/tkw123/HiGOE). HiGoE redefines the retrieval process by replacing unreliable chunk-based methods with a filtered proposition–evidence graph, ensuring verifiable fact grounding and substantially reducing hallucination. Moreover, HiGoE leverages Personalized PageRank (PPR) to cluster related nodes into thematic hierarchies, thereby restoring global document structure and effectively mitigating attention dilution. To model complex, multi-level relations beyond mere shallow similarity, we develop an Enhanced Graph Attention Network. Experiments show HiGoE consistently surpasses baselines in quality and efficiency.

Abstract:
Event Argument Extraction (EAE) aims to identify event arguments and assign semantic roles under a predefined schema. Recent work formulates EAE with large language models as a structured conditional generation task and applies Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to optimize sequence-level event structures. However, RLVR-based EAE supervision is coarse-grained, as a single reward is assigned to the whole event structure, while optimization happens at the token level. This misalignment causes the same reward to be applied to all tokens, including those not related to event roles or arguments, introducing noise into the gradient updates and weakening the signals for decisions critical to argument extraction. To mitigate this misalignment, we propose Hybrid Token Masking RLVR (HTMR), which selectively updates policy gradients on both high-entropy forking tokens and event-critical tokens that define event structure, along with multi-perspective reasoning. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and models show that HTMR consistently outperforms full-token and high-entropy only RLVR methods. Moreover, HTMR transfers effectively as a plug-and-play approach to other tasks such as named entity recognition and relation classification. The code is publicly available for reproducibility.

Abstract:
We present AutoSchemaKG, a framework for fully autonomous knowledge graph construction that eliminates the need for predefined schemas. Our system leverages large language models to simultaneously extract knowledge triples and induce comprehensive schemas directly from text, modeling both entities and events while employing conceptualization to organize instances into semantic categories. Processing over 50 million documents, we construct ATLAS (Automated Triple Linking And Schema induction), a family of knowledge graphs with 900+ million nodes and 5.9 billion edges. This approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on multi-hop QA tasks and enhances LLM factuality. Notably, our schema induction achieves 92% semantic alignment with human-crafted schemas with zero manual intervention, demonstrating that billion-scale knowledge graphs with dynamically induced schemas can effectively complement parametric knowledge in large language models.

Abstract:
As large language models continue to advance, their application in educational contexts remains underexplored and under-optimized. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing the first diverse benchmark tailored for educational scenarios, incorporating synthetic data containing 9 major scenarios and over 4,000 distinct educational contexts. To enable comprehensive assessment, we propose a set of multi-dimensional evaluation metrics that cover 12 critical aspects relevant to both teachers and students. We further apply human annotation to ensure the effectiveness of the model-generated evaluation responses. Additionally, we succeed to train a relatively small-scale model on our constructed dataset and demonstrate that it can achieve performance comparable to state-of-the-art large models (e.g., Deepseek V3, Qwen Max) on the test set. Overall, this work provides a practical foundation for the development and evaluation of education-oriented language models.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) transition from chat interfaces to integral components of stochastic pipelines and systems approaching general intelligence, the ability to faithfully sample from specified probability distributions has become a functional requirement rather than a theoretical curiosity. We present the first large-scale, statistically powered audit of native probabilistic sampling in frontier LLMs, benchmarking 11 models across 15 distributions. To disentangle failure modes, we employ a dual-protocol design: Batch Generation, where a model produces N=1000 samples within one response, and Independent Requests, comprising N=1000 stateless calls. We observe a sharp protocol asymmetry: batch generation achieves only modest statistical validity, with a 7% median pass rate, while independent requests collapse almost entirely, with 10 of 11 models passing none of the distributions. Beyond this asymmetry, we reveal that sampling fidelity degrades monotonically with distributional complexity and aggravates as the sampling horizon N increases. Finally, we demonstrate how the propagation of these failures into downstream real-world application tasks introduces systematic biases: models fail to enforce uniform answer-position constraints in Multiple Choice Question generation and systematically violate demographic targets in attribute-constrained text-to-image prompt synthesis. These findings indicate that current LLMs lack a functional internal sampler, necessitating external tools for applications requiring statistical guarantees.

Abstract:
The development of AI-assisted Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI) for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is severely constrained by data scarcity. Furthermore, while Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) serves as the gold standard for clinical intervention, general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to strictly adhere to its standardized procedures, often resulting in interactions that are linguistically fluent but strategically inconsistent. To address these challenges, we introduce ASDAgent, a strategy-aware framework designed to unify high-fidelity intervention dialogue synthesis and clinical decision support. ASDAgent incorporates two specialized components to solve distinct problems: (i) a DoctorAgent equipped with an Observe-Think-Act-Correct (O-T-A-C) reasoning loop, which resolves the issue of strategy collapse in LLMs by making ABA execution explicit and controllable; and (ii) a ChildAgent that utilizes probabilistic behavior modeling to mitigate data homogeneity, simulating diverse and non-deterministic ASD response patterns. Experiments demonstrate that dialogues generated by ASDAgent closely mirror the strategy distribution of human therapists (KL divergence: 0.083). In real autism intervention, ASDAgent achieves nearly 80% strategic consistency with human experts. Moreover, we show that synthetic data produced by ASDAgent effectively distills professional clinical knowledge into small language models (SLMs), significantly enhancing their therapeutic capabilities.

Abstract:
As LLMs are increasingly deployed in real-world interactions, their social reasoning in interpersonal communication becomes critical. To explore their capabilities, we introduce SCRIPTS, a 1.1k-dialogue dataset in English and Korean, sourced from movie scripts and propose a social reasoning task based on SCRIPTS that evaluates the capacity of LLMs to infer the social relationships (e.g., friends, lovers) between speakers in each dialogue. Evaluating nine models on our task, current LLMs achieve around 75–80% on the English dataset and 58–69% in Korean, and models predict an Unlikely relationship in 10–25% of responses in both languages.Furthermore, we find that thinking models and chain-of-thought prompting provide minimal benefits for social reasoning and occasionally amplify social biases.In sum, there are significant limitations in current LLMs’ social reasoning capabilities, especially for Korean, highlighting the need for efforts to develop socially-aware LLMs across languages.

Abstract:
Large language model-powered code agents are rapidly transforming software engineering, yet the security risks of their generated code have become a critical concern. Existing benchmarks have provided valuable insights, but they fail to capture scenarios in which vulnerabilities are actually introduced by human developers, making fair comparisons between humans and agents infeasible. We therefore introduce SecureVibeBench, a benchmark of 105 C/C++ secure coding tasks sourced from 41 projects in OSS-Fuzz for code agents. SecureVibeBench has the following features: (i) realistic task settings that require multi-file edits in large repositories, (ii) aligned contexts based on real-world open-source vulnerabilities with precisely identified vulnerability introduction points, and (iii) comprehensive evaluation that combines functionality testing and security checking with both static and dynamic oracles. We evaluate 5 popular code agents like OpenHands, supported by 5 LLMs (e.g., Claude sonnet 4.5) on SecureVibeBench. Results show that current agents struggle to produce both correct and secure code, as even the best-performing one, produces merely 23.8% correct and secure solutions on SecureVibeBench.

Abstract:
Despite their global prevalence, many Large Language Models (LLMs) are aligned to a monolithic, often Western-centric set of values. This paper investigates the more challenging task of fine-grained value alignment: examining whether LLMs can emulate the distinct cultural values of demographic subgroups. Using Singapore as a case study and the World Values Survey (WVS), we examine the value landscape and show that even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4.1 achieve only 57.4% accuracy in predicting subgroup modal preferences. We construct a dataset of over 20,000 samples to train and evaluate a range of models. We demonstrate that simple fine-tuning on structured numerical preferences yields substantial gains, improving accuracy on unseen, out-of-distribution subgroups by an average of 17.4%. These gains partially transfer to open-ended generation. However, we find significant pre-existing performance biases, where models better emulate young, male, Chinese, and Christian personas. Furthermore, while fine-tuning improves average performance, it widens the disparity between subgroups when measured by distance-aware metrics. Our work offers insights into the limits and fairness implications of subgroup-level cultural alignment.

Abstract:
Recent Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) like DeepSeek-R1 have demonstrated remarkable success in complex reasoning tasks, exhibiting human-like patterns in exploring multiple alternative solutions. Upon closer inspection, however, we uncover a surprising phenomenon: The First is The Best, where alternative solutions are not merely suboptimal but potentially detrimental. This observation challenges widely accepted test-time scaling laws, leading us to hypothesize that errors within the reasoning path scale concurrently with test time. Through comprehensive empirical analysis, we characterize errors as a forest-structured Forest of Errors (FoE) and conclude that FoE makes the First the Best, which is underpinned by rigorous theoretical analysis. Leveraging these insights, we propose RED, a self-guided efficient reasoning framework comprising two components: I) Refining First, which suppresses FoE growth in the first solution; and II) Discarding Subs, which prunes subsequent FoE via dual-consistency. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks and six backbone models demonstrate that RED outperforms eight competitive baselines, achieving performance gains of up to 19.0% while reducing token consumption by 37.7% 70.4%. Moreover, comparative experiments on FoE metrics shed light on how RED achieves effectiveness.

Abstract:
The convergence of LLM-powered research assistants and AI-based peer review systems creates a critical vulnerability: fully automated publication loops where AI-generated research is evaluated by AI reviewers without human oversight. We investigate this through BadScientist, a framework that evaluates whether fabrication-oriented paper generation agents can deceive multi-model LLM review systems. Our generator employs presentation-manipulation strategies requiring no real experiments. We develop a rigorous evaluation framework with formal error guarantees (concentration bounds and calibration analysis), calibrated on real data. Our results reveal systematic vulnerabilities: fabricated papers achieve acceptance rates up to 18%. Critically, we identify concern-acceptance conflict—reviewers frequently flag integrity issues yet assign acceptance-level scores. Our mitigation strategies show only marginal improvements, with detection accuracy barely exceeding random chance. Despite provably sound aggregation mathematics, integrity checking systematically fails, exposing fundamental limitations in current AI-driven review systems and underscoring the urgent need for defense-in-depth safeguards in scientific publishing.

Abstract:
Knowledge Tracing (KT) is essential for tracking students’ evolving knowledge states and predicting their future performance. While current graph-based methods focus on exercise-concept relations, they often overlook the inherent group structures among students. Similarly, emerging LLM-based approaches rely on individual histories, lacking the broader context of group references and contrastive evidence. As a result, existing individual-isolation paradigms fail to provide stable predictions and evidence-based explanations. To bridge this gap, we propose Micro-Community Knowledge Tracing (MicroC-KT), a framework that incorporates learning micro-environments to provide social-cognitive anchors for KT. MicroC-KT identifies latent learning communities via hypergraph modeling and generates dual-granular summaries to facilitate community matching and peer retrieval. By extracting contrastive group evidence, the model prompts an LLM to generate both accurate answer predictions and verifiable analysis reports. Experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that MicroC-KT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in predictive performance while providing more reliable and evidence-based explanations.

Abstract:
Enabling Large Language Models (LLMs) to evolve sustainably requires simultaneously preserving previously acquired knowledge (Past), effectively acquiring new task-specific skills (Present), and reserving sufficient parameter capacity for subsequent adaptation (Future). However, existing continual learning (CL) paradigms often prioritize immediate performance through dense updates, leading to catastrophic forgetting and rapid exhaustion of model capacity. To harmonize these conflicting demands, we draw inspiration from the brain’s functional partitioning and propose the Null-Space Constrained Parameter Region Specificity Method (PaRSP). PaRSP establishes a dynamic "Task-Region Mapping" that distinguishes between specialized neurons and generalist neurons. By precisely localizing a sparse "functional core" for each task, PaRSP restricts updates to specific regions via null-space orthogonality, preserving the vast majority of the network as an immutable "long-term memory bank." This induced sparsity not only enhances plasticity via targeted adaptation and minimizes interference to ensure stability, but also strategically reserves substantial capacity, securing sustainability for future evolution. Extensive experiments validate PaRSP’s state-of-the-art performance, particularly on Standard CL and Long Sequence benchmarks, effectively harmonizing the stability-plasticity-sustainability trade-off. Code is available at https://github.com/JinhuiBot/PaRSP

Abstract:
Generative audio modeling has largely been fragmented into specialized tasks, text-to-speech (TTS), text-to-music (TTM), and text-to-audio (TTA), each operating under heterogeneous control paradigms. Unifying these modalities remains a fundamental challenge due to the intrinsic dissonance between structured semantic representations (speech/music) and unstructured acoustic textures (sound effects). In this paper, we introduce UniSonate , a unified flow-matching framework capable of synthesizing speech, music, and sound effects through a standardized, reference-free natural language instruction interface. To reconcile structural disparities, we propose a novel dynamic token injection mechanism that projects unstructured environmental sounds into a structured temporal latent space, enabling precise duration control within a phoneme-driven Multimodal Diffusion Transformer (MM-DiT). Coupled with a multi-stage curriculum learning strategy, this approach effectively mitigates cross-modal optimization conflicts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UniSonate achieves state-of-the-art performance in instruction-based TTS (WER 1.47%) and TTM (SongEval Coherence 3.18), while maintaining competitive fidelity in TTA. Crucially, we observe positive transfer , where joint training on diverse audio data significantly enhances structural coherence and prosodic expressiveness compared to single-task baselines.

Abstract:
The rapid development of Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) raises concerns about watermarking for DLM-generated detection. However, existing sequential LLM watermarking cannot be directly applied to DLMs, as DLMs’ generation order is arbitrary. While emerging studies adapt biased LLM watermarking to DLMs by temporarily predicting the watermark prefix, they suffer from degraded quality and unstable watermarking due to bias accumulation and prediction errors. Besides, they cannot carry multi-bit watermarks. In this paper, we propose unbiased multi-bit watermarking for DLMs. We introduce a stability-aware constraint that allows watermarking only in stable contexts and a bit-controlled, unbiased modulation to preserve the original DLM output distribution, achieving stable watermarking with minimal quality impact. To enhance detection robustness, we design a Regret-based Remasking , which grants a “second chance” for unwatermarked tokens to be regenerated. It can seamlessly integrate into DLM inference with no added diffusion steps and latency. Experiments across DLMs and various tasks show that our scheme is effective, achieving superior generation quality compared to baselines while maintaining high detection accuracy and multi-bit capacity. Our code is available here https://github.com/iieSKLCSDsg/UMR.

Abstract:
Civil judicial cases are highly complicated, posing significant challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs) for Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP). While judges manage this complexity through the dispute focus—a mechanism distilling cases into core issues—existing research largely overlooks this tool in favor of generic reasoning frameworks that lack authentic judicial logic. To bridge this gap, we first introduce FocalLaw , the first dataset aligning full-process Chinese civil judicial data through the dispute focus, comprising 1,000 high-quality cases across six causes of action. Building on this dataset, we examine LLMs’ capability to utilize the dispute focus and uncover a counter-intuitive phenomenon: LLMs fail to leverage the dispute focus even with CoT and SFT, which we identify as the "Clerk Trap".To solve the problem, we propose FocalJudge , a novel framework that leverages the dispute focus to guide LLMs through a structured, judge-like cognitive workflow. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of FocalJudge and offer valuable insights into the interpretability and reliability of LLMs in the legal domain.

Abstract:
Argument generation is a fundamental NLP task that aims to automatically produce persuasive arguments.Effective human argumentation is inherently complex and multifaceted, integrating argumentative strategies, appropriate styles, and adaptation to target audiences, etc.However, existing studies focus on limited control signals such as topic, stance, or key aspects, failing to capture this complexity.As LLMs advance, the lack of benchmarks evaluating multifaceted argumentative control becomes a critical bottleneck.To address this, we introduce ArgGenBench, a novel benchmark containing complex instructions that integrate multi-dimensional control, including topic, stance, length, style, strategy, audience, and key points.Extensive evaluation across 15 LLMs reveals significant limitations: even the best-performing model achieves only 42.7% win rate against human-verified references.These results highlight the challenge of controlled argument generation and establish ArgGenBench as a rigorous testbed for developing more capable systems.

Abstract:
Federated domain generalization for person re-identification (FedDG-ReID) aims to collaboratively train a pedestrian retrieval model across multiple decentralized source domains such that it can generalize to unseen target environments without compromising raw data privacy. However, this task is significantly challenged by the inherent stylistic gaps across decentralized clients. Without global supervision, models easily succumb to shortcut learning where representations overfit to domain specific camera biases rather than universal identity features. We propose CO-EVO, a novel federated framework that resolves this semantic-style conflict through a co-evolutionary mechanism. On the semantic side, Camera-Invariant Semantic Anchoring (CSA) learns identity prompts with cross-camera consistency to establish purified and domain-agnostic anchors that filter out local imaging noise. On the visual side, Global Style Diversification (GSD), powered by a Global Camera-Style Bank (GCSB), synthesizes realistic perturbations to expand the visual boundaries of training data. The core of CO-EVO is its co-evolutionary loop where purified anchors act as gravitational centers to guide the image encoder toward robust anatomical attributes amidst diverse style variations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CO-EVO achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, proving that the synergy between semantic purification and style expansion is essential for robust cross-domain generalization. Our code is available at: https://github.com/NanYiyuzurn/ACL-LGPS-2026 .

Authors: Abdellah EL Mekki, Samar M. Magdy, Houdaifa Atou, Ruwa AbuHweidi, Baraah Qawasmeh, Omer Nacar, Thikra Al-hibiri, Razan Saadie, Hamzah A. Alsayadi, Nadia Ghezaiel Hammouda, Alshima Mohammed Alkhazimi, Aya Hamod, Al-Yas Yaqoob Al-Ghafri, Wesam El-Sayed, Asila Ismail al Sharji, Mohamad Ballout, Anas Belfathi, Karim Ghaddar, Serry Sibaee, Alaa Aoun, Aeej Mohammed Aseri, Lina Abureesh, Ahlam Bashiti, Majdal Yousef, Abdulaziz Hafiz, Yehdih Mohamed, Emira Hamedtou, Brakehe Emehah, Rahaf Alhamouri, Youssef Nafea, Aya El Aatar, Walid Al-Dhabyani, Emhemed S. Hamed, Sara Shatnawi, Fakhraddin Alwajih, Khalid Elkhidir, Ashwag Alasmari, Abdurrahman Gerrio, Omar Said Alshahri, AbdelRahim A. Elmadany, Ismail Berrada, Amir Azad Adli Al-kathiri, Fadi Zaraket, Mustafa Jarrar, Yahya Mohamed EL Hadj, Hassan Alhuzali, Muhammad Abdul-Mageed

Abstract:
Arabic is a highly diglossic language where most daily communication occurs in regional dialects rather than Modern Standard Arabic (MSA). Despite this, machine translation (MT) systems often generalize poorly to dialectal input, limiting their utility for millions of speakers. We introduce Alexandria, a large-scale, community-driven, human-translated dataset designed to bridge this gap. Alexandria covers 13 Arab countries and 11 high-impact domains, including health, education, and agriculture. Unlike previous resources, Alexandria provides unprecedented granularity by associating contributions with city-of-origin metadata, capturing authentic local varieties beyond coarse regional labels. The dataset consists of parallel English-Dialectal Arabic multi-turn conversational scenarios annotated with speaker-addressee gender configurations, enabling the study of gender-conditioned variation in dialectal use. Comprising 107K total turns, Alexandria serves as both a training resource and as a rigorous benchmark for evaluating MT and Large Language Models (LLMs). Our automatic and human evaluation benchmarks the current capabilities of Arabic-aware LLMs in translating across diverse Arabic dialects and sub-dialects while exposing significant persistent challenges.The Alexandria dataset, the creation prompts, the translation and revision guidelines, and the evaluation code are publicly available in the following repository: https://github.com/UBC-NLP/Alexandria

Abstract:
Peer review is a multi-stage process involving reviews, rebuttals, meta-reviews, final decisions, and subsequent manuscript revisions. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have motivated methods that assist or automate different stages of this pipeline. In this survey, we synthesize techniques for (i) peer review generation, including fine-tuning strategies, agent-based systems, RL-based methods, and emerging paradigms to enhance generation; (ii) after-review tasks including rebuttals, meta-review and revision aligned to reviews; and (iii) evaluation methods spanning human-centered, reference-based, LLM-based and aspect-oriented. We catalog datasets, compare modeling choices, and discuss limitations, ethical concerns, and future directions. The survey aims to provide practical guidance for building, evaluating, and integrating LLM systems across the full peer review workflow.

Abstract:
The growing demand for automated writing assistance in diverse academic domains highlights the need for robust Chinese Grammatical Error Correction (CGEC) systems that can adapt across disciplines. However, existing CGEC research largely lacks dedicated benchmarks for multi-disciplinary academic writing, overlooking continual learning (CL) as a promising solution to handle domain-specific linguistic variation and prevent catastrophic forgetting. To fill this crucial gap, we introduce CL 2 GEC, the first Continual Learning benchmark for Chinese Literature Grammatical Error Correction, designed to evaluate adaptive CGEC across multiple academic fields. Our benchmark includes 10,000 human-annotated sentences spanning 10 disciplines, each exhibiting distinct linguistic styles and error patterns. CL 2 GEC focuses on evaluating grammatical error correction in a continual learning setting, simulating sequential exposure to diverse academic disciplines to reflect real-world editorial dynamics. We evaluate large language models under sequential tuning, parameter-efficient adaptation, and four representative CL algorithms, using both standard GEC metrics and continual learning metrics adapted to task-level variation. Experimental results reveal that regularization-based methods mitigate forgetting more effectively than replay-based or naive sequential approaches. Our benchmark provides a rigorous foundation for future research in adaptive grammatical error correction across diverse academic domains.

Abstract:
3D Visual Grounding (3DVG) locates objects in 3D scenes based on natural language descriptions. However, existing methods are primarily confined to small-scale indoor data or rely on heavy supervision, failing to generalize to the complexity of large-scale urban environments. To address this limitation, we present CityVG, the first city-scale zero-shot 3D visual grounding framework capable of localizing urban objects without manual annotations. Our approach adopts a retrieval-and-reasoning paradigm comprising two key components. Specifically, we propose a contrastive fine-tuning strategy to align textual queries with urban scene graphs. By leveraging an LLM-driven graph clustering mechanism, we automatically construct high-quality positive and negative training pairs and fine-tune the text encoder via contrastive learning, resulting in a scene-adaptive text encoder that enables efficient alignment without grounding supervision. Complementing this, we introduce a multi-trajectory reward-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning strategy for inference. This mechanism iteratively evaluates candidate objects by aggregating reward scores across diverse reasoning trajectories, selecting the target that is most consistent with both appearance and spatial constraints. Extensive experiments on city-scale 3D grounding benchmarks demonstrate that CityVG achieves strong zero-shot localization performance and generalizes effectively to unseen urban environments.

Abstract:
A defence opinion is an essential step in criminal proceedings, yet it has not been systematically formulated or evaluated as a specific LegalAI task. Grounded in legal principles and practice, we formulate this task as generating a structured defence opinion conditioned jointly on an indictment and the defendant’s stated opinion, which often present conflicting claims. We formalize this setting as a dual-perspective generation problem and introduce DefGen-Bench, a benchmark comprising several Chinese criminal cases with expert-reviewed reference defence opinions. We evaluate eight large language models (LLMs) on this task and observe that existing models tend to mirror the defendant’s opinion, thereby overlooking more appropriate defence strategies. To address this challenge, we propose Knowledge-Enhanced Highlighted Indictment (KHI), a legal knowledge–guided input enhancement method applicable to both open- and closed-source LLMs. Experiments demonstrate consistent improvements across all evaluated LLMs, validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Abstract:
Existing document OCR largely targets plain text or Markdown, discarding the structural and executable properties that make LaTeX essential for scientific publishing. We study page-level reconstruction of scientific PDFs into compilable LaTeX and introduce TexOCR-Bench, a benchmark, and TexOCR-Train, a large-scale training corpus, for this task. TexOCR-Bench features a multi-dimensional evaluation suite that jointly assesses transcription fidelity, structural faithfulness, and end-to-end compilability. Leveraging TexOCR-Train, we train a 2B-parameter model, TexOCR, using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) with verifiable rewards derived from LaTeX unit tests that directly enforce compilability and referential integrity. Experiments across 21 frontier models on TexOCR-Bench show that existing systems frequently violate key document invariants, including consistent section structure, correct float placement, and valid label–reference links, which undermines compilation reliability and downstream usability. Our analysis further reveals that RL with verifiable rewards yields consistent improvements over SFT alone, particularly on structural and compilation metrics.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) enhance their problem-solving capability by utilizing external tools. However, in open-world scenarios with massive and evolving tool repositories, existing methods relying on static embedding retrieval or parameter memorization of tools struggle to align user intent with tool semantics or generalize to unseen tools, respectively, leading to suboptimal accuracy of open-world tool retrieval and execution. To address these, we present ToolOmni, a unified agentic framework that enables LLMs for open-world tool use by proactive retrieval and grounded execution within a reasoning loop. First, we construct a cold-start multi-turn interaction dataset to instill foundational agentic capabilities via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Then, we introduce open-world tool learning based on a Decoupled Multi-Objective GRPO algorithm, which simultaneously optimizes LLMs for both tool retrieval accuracy and execution efficacy in online environments. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ToolOmni achieves state-of-the-art performance both in retrieval and execution, surpassing strong baselines by a significant margin of +10.8% in end-to-end execution success rate, while exhibiting exceptional robustness and generalization capabilities.

Abstract:
While Small Language Models (SLMs) have demonstrated promising performance on an increasingly wide array of commonsense reasoning benchmarks, current evaluation practices rely almost exclusively on the accuracy of their final answers, neglecting the validity of the reasoning processes that lead to those answers. To address this issue, we present ReTraceQA, a novel benchmark that introduces process-level evaluation for commonsense reasoning tasks. Our expert-annotated dataset reveals that in a substantial portion of instances (14-24%), SLMs provide correct final answers despite flawed reasoning processes, suggesting that the capabilities of SLMs are often overestimated by evaluation metrics that focus only on comparing the final answer with the ground truth. Indeed, we show that, when employing strong Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated judges for reasoning-aware evaluation rather than answer-only metrics, SLM performance drops significantly across all models and datasets, with scores decreasing by up to 25%.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are inherently constrained by their fixed-length context windows, which limits LLMs’ ability to retain and utilize information across long-term interactions. To address this limitation, recent work has proposed external memory modules for LLMs. Using memory modules typically involves two stages: evidence retrieval and memory utilization. While prior work focuses on the architecture of memory modules and the retrieval stage, the equally critical memory utilization stage remains underexplored. Building on this, we propose MemCoRL, a two-stage alternating co-optimization reinforcement learning method. Stage 1 optimizes evidence retrieval using citation feedback and semantic accuracy from utilization as rewards. Stage 2 optimizes utilization with rewards combining semantic similarity and lexical overlap. Iterative co-optimization establishes a positive feedback loop: better retrieval improves memory utilization, which in turn refines retrieval rewards. Experimental results show our approach outperforms the leading baselines on both lexical overlap and semantic similarity metrics, confirming the co-optimization in memory retrieval and memory utilization.

Abstract:
Current evaluations of geospatial reasoning in LLMs are frequently impeded by the entanglement of factual recall and spatial logic, which often obscures the models’ true capabilities in complex city-scale environments. To address this, we introduce UrbanGeoEval, a comprehensive benchmark featuring a dual-module framework designed to disentangle these competencies. The Knowledge Module assesses urban memory via scalable map-based queries, while the Reasoning Module isolates pure logical inference across 3,148 realistic tasks by providing necessary geospatial context. Unlike prior benchmarks that hand the model pre-computed spatial text, UrbanGeoEval provides raw geometry and forces the model to act as a spatial computing engine. Our evaluation methodology introduces a reliable hybrid pipeline that merges deterministic programmatic checks with an LLM-as-a-Judge, achieving expert-level evaluation accuracy. Extensive experiments on 18 widely used LLMs uncover critical insights: (1) models exhibit severe geographic biases and resolution gaps; (2) failures in complex multi-hop tasks often stem from brittle foundational spatial skills rather than high-level logic deficits. UrbanGeoEval provides a precise diagnostic tool for advancing urban geospatial intelligence in LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as co-authors in collaborative writing, where users begin with rough drafts and rely on LLMs to complete, revise, and refine their content. However, this capability poses a serious safety risk: malicious users could jailbreak the models—filling incomplete drafts with dangerous content—to force them into generating harmful outputs. In this paper, we identify the vulnerability of current LLMs to such draft-based co-authoring jailbreak attacks and introduce HarDBench, a systematic benchmark designed to evaluate the robustness of LLMs against this emerging threat. HarDBench spans a range of high-risk domains—including Explosives, Drugs, Weapons, and Cyberattacks—and features prompts with realistic structure and domain-specific cues to assess the model susceptibility to harmful completions. To mitigate this risk, we introduce a safety-utility balanced alignment approach based on preference optimization, training models to refuse harmful completions while remaining helpful on benign drafts. Experimental results show that existing LLMs are highly vulnerable in co-authoring contexts and our alignment method significantly reduces harmful outputs without degrading performance on co-authoring capabilities. This presents a new paradigm for evaluating and aligning LLMs in human-LLM collaborative writing settings. Our new benchmark and dataset are available on our project page at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/HarDBench_data-17E4.

Abstract:
Sign language research has achieved significant progress due to the advances in large language models (LLMs). However, the intrinsic ability of LLMs to understand sign language, especially in multimodal contexts, remains underexplored. To address this limitation, we introduce CNSL-bench , the first comprehensive C hinese N ational S ign L anguage bench mark designed for evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in sign language understanding. The proposed CNSL-bench is characterized by: 1) Authoritative grounding, as it is anchored to the officially standardized National Common Sign Language Dictionary , mitigating ambiguity from regional or non-canonical variants and ensuring consistent semantic definitions; 2) Multimodal coverage, providing aligned textual descriptions, illustrative images, and sign language videos; and 3) Articulatory diversity, supporting fine-grained analysis across key manual articulatory forms, including air-writing, finger-spelling, and the Chinese manual-alphabet. Using CNSL-bench, we extensively evaluate 21 open-source and proprietary up-to-date MLLMs. Our results reveal that, despite recent advances in multimodal modeling, current MLLMs remain substantially inferior to human performance, exhibiting systematic disparities across input modalities and manual articulatory forms. Additional diagnostic analyses suggest that several performance limitations persist beyond improvements in reasoning and that instruction-following robustness varies substantially across models.

Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training across organizational silos without sharing raw data, making it attractive for privacy-sensitive applications. With the rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs), federated fine-tuning of generative LLMs has gained attention as a way to leverage distributed data while preserving confidentiality. However, this setting introduces fundamental challenges: (i) privacy leakage of personally identifiable information (PII) due to LLM memorization, and (ii) a persistent tension between global generalization and local utility under heterogeneous data. Existing defenses, such as data sanitization and differential privacy, reduce leakage but often degrade downstream performance. We propose SecureGate, a privacy-aware federated fine-tuning framework for LLMs that provides fine-grained privacy control without sacrificing utility. SecureGate employs a dual-adapter LoRA architecture: a secure adapter that learns sanitized, globally shareable representations, and a revealing adapter that captures sensitive, organization-specific knowledge. A token-controlled gating module selectively activates these adapters at inference time, enabling controlled information disclosure without retraining. Extensive experiments across multiple LLMs and real-world datasets show that SecureGate improves task utility while substantially reducing PII leakage, achieving up to a 31.66x reduction in inference attack accuracy and a 17.07x reduction in extraction recall for unauthorized requests. Additionally, it maintains 100% routing reliability to the correct adapter and incurs only minimal computational and communication overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/wsu-cyber-security-lab-ai/SecureGate.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward (RLVR) has significantly advanced the complex reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it struggles to break through the inherent capability boundaries of the base LLM, due to its essentially on-policy strategy coupled with LLM’s immense action space and sparse reward. Critically, RLVR can lead to the capability boundary collapse, narrowing the LLM’s problem-solving scope. To address this problem, we propose R-PLUS, a novel hybrid-policy optimization approach for LLMs that synergizes internal exploitation with external data to achieve stronger reasoning capabilities and surpass the boundaries of base models. R-PLUS integrates two core components, i.e., Multiple Importance Sampling to address distributional mismatch from external data, and Exploration-Based Advantage Function to guide the model towards high-value, unexplored reasoning paths. We provide both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments to demonstrate the superiority and generalizability of our approach. Compared with existing RLVR methods, R-PLUS achieves 1) state-of-the-art performance on six math reasoning benchmarks; 2) superior performance on six out-of-distribution reasoning tasks; 3) consistent and significant gains across diverse model families, with average relative improvements up to 69.2%. Moreover, the analysis of Pass@k curves indicates that R-PLUS effectively resolves the capability boundary collapse problem.

Abstract:
The linear memory growth of the KV cache poses a significant bottleneck for LLM inference in long-context tasks. Existing static compression methods often fail to preserve globally important information. Although recent dynamic retrieval approaches attempt to address this issue, they typically suffer from coarse-grained caching strategies and incur high I/O overhead. To overcome these limitations, we propose HeteroCache, a training-free dynamic compression framework. Our method is built on two key insights: attention heads exhibit diverse temporal heterogeneity, and there is significant spatial redundancy among heads within the same layer.Guided by these insights, HeteroCache categorizes heads based on stability and similarity, applying a fine-grained weighting strategy that allocates larger cache budgets to heads with rapidly shifting attention to capture context changes.Furthermore, it features a hierarchical storage mechanism where representative heads monitor attention drift to trigger asynchronous, on-demand context retrieval, thereby hiding I/O latency.Experiments demonstrate that HeteroCache achieves state-of-the-art performance on long-context benchmarks and accelerates decoding by up to 3× compared to the original model with a 224K context. Our code is available at https://github.com/ponytaill/HeteroCache.

Abstract:
Tool-calling agents are increasingly deployed in real-world customer-facing workflows. Yet most studies on tool-calling agents focus on idealized settings with general, fixed, and well-specified tasks.In real-world applications, user requests are often (1) ambiguous, (2) changing over time, or (3) infeasible due to policy constraints, and training and evaluation data that cover these diverse, complex interaction patterns remain under-represented.To bridge the gap, we present Trajectory2Task a verifiable data generation pipeline for studying tool use at scale under three realistic user scenarios: ambiguous intent, changing intent, and infeasible intents.The pipeline first conducts multi-turn exploration to produce valid tool-call trajectories. It then converts these trajectories into user-facing tasks with controlled intent adaptations. This process yields verifiable task that support closed-loop evaluation and training. We benchmark several state-of-the-art LLMs on the generated complex user scenario tasks and observe frequent failures.Finally, using successful trajectories obtained from task rollouts, we fine-tune lightweight LLMs and find consistent improvements across all three conditions, along with better generalization to unseen tool-use domains, indicating stronger tool-calling ability.

Abstract:
The evaluation of generated reports remains a critical challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) report generation, due to the large volume of text, the diversity and complexity of findings, and the presence of fine-grained, disease-oriented attributes. Conventional evaluation metrics offer only coarse measures of lexical overlap or entity matching and fail to reflect the granular diagnostic accuracy required for clinical use. To address this gap, we propose CT-FineBench, a benchmark built from CT-RATE and Merlin to evaluate the fine-grained factual consistency of CT reports, constructed from CT-RATE and Merlin. Our benchmark is constructed through a meticulous, Question-Answering (QA) based process: first, we identify and structure key, finding-specific clinical attributes (e.g., location, size, margin). Second, we systematically transform these attributes into a QA dataset, where questions probe for specific clinical details grounded in gold-standard reports. The evaluation protocol for CT-FineBench involves using this QA dataset to query a machine-generated report and scoring the correctness of the answers. This allows for a comprehensive, interpretable, and clinically-relevant assessment, moving beyond superficial lexical overlap to pinpoint specific clinical errors. Experiments show that CT-FineBench correlates better with expert clinical assessment and is substantially more sensitive to fine-grained factual errors than prior metrics.

Abstract:
Transformer-based Small (SLMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong effectiveness in text classification (TC), yet deployment requires reliable confidence estimates. Although miscalibration in Transformers has been reported, evidence for TC under fine-tuning remains limited. We evaluate the calibration of fine-tuned SLMs and LLMs against Logistic Regression, a classical, well-calibrated baseline, and find that, despite superior effectiveness, Transformers remain markedly overconfident. Crucially, we show that widely used calibration metrics, such as Expected Calibration Error and Brier Score, become biased in high-effectiveness regimes, where the dominance of correct predictions masks severe miscalibration on errors, sometimes even suggesting better calibration than Logistic Regression, a well-known calibrated method. To address this limitation, we propose the Balanced Brier Score (BBS), which balances the contribution of correct and incorrect predictions within confidence bins. BBS reveals substantially poorer calibration in both SLMs and LLMs, consistent with qualitative evidence from calibration curves. These findings challenge current calibration assessment practices and provide a more reliable alternative for evaluating confidence quality in Transformer-based TC.

Abstract:
Machine learning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare requires not only strong predictive performance but also reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) to support human oversight. Multi-label text classification (MLTC) is a central task in this domain, yet remains challenging due to label imbalances, dependencies, and combinatorial complexity. Existing MLTC benchmarks are increasingly saturated and may be affected by training data contamination, making it difficult to distinguish genuine reasoning capabilities from memorization. We introduce MADE, a living MLTC benchmark derived from m edical device ad verse e vent reports and continuously updated with newly published reports to prevent contamination. MADE features a long-tailed distribution of hierarchical labels and enables reproducible evaluation with strict temporal splits. We establish baselines across more than 20 encoder- and decoder-only models under fine-tuning and few-shot settings (instruction-tuned/reasoning variants, local/API-accessible). We systematically assess entropy-/consistency-based and self-verbalized UQ methods. Results show clear trade-offs: smaller discriminatively fine-tuned decoders achieve the strongest head-to-tail accuracy while maintaining competitive UQ; generative fine-tuning delivers the most reliable UQ; large reasoning models improve performance on rare labels yet exhibit surprisingly weak UQ; and self-verbalized confidence is not a reliable proxy for uncertainty. Our work is publicly available at https://hhi.fraunhofer.de/aml-demonstrator/made-benchmark.

Abstract:
Inference-time steering provides a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying model activations without updating weights. However, existing methods often rely on a global intervention vector, overlook token-level causal influence, and underutilize model logits, especially in multimodal settings where visual and textual inputs contribute unevenly. We propose GrAInS, a contrastive, gradient-based approach that leverages Integrated Gradients to identify top-k influential tokens and construct directional steering vectors based on their contribution to preferred over dispreferred outputs. These vectors guide activation intervention at each layer, preserving the representational scale. GrAInS outperforms fine-tuning and prior steering methods on both LLM and VLM tasks: improving TruthfulQA accuracy by 13.22% (Llama-3.1-8B), reducing MMHal-Bench hallucinations from 0.624 to 0.514 (LLaVA-1.6-7B), and increasing SPA-VL alignment by 8.11%, all without degrading fluency or general capabilities.

Abstract:
Identifying logical fallacies (LFs) in everyday discourse is challenging for many people. This challenge is amplified in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs), where malicious agents can deploy fallacious arguments to disseminate misinformation at scale. In this work, we explore the potential of LLMs as part of the solution. We introduce LFTutor, an intelligent tutoring system which uses LLMs to tutor humans and help them learn about logical fallacies. LFTutor integrates intent-driven Socratic questioning and critical argumentation principles to actively engage learners to reflect on their reasoning. Through both automatic and human evaluations, we demonstrate that LFTutor significantly outperforms baseline LLMs lacking such pedagogical strategies. This work highlights the promise of combining LLMs with pedagogical scaffolding to foster critical thinking and argument literacy in the age of AI.

Abstract:
Translating software written in C to Rust has significant benefits in improving memory safety. However, manual translation is cumbersome, error-prone, and often produces unidiomatic code. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promise in producing idiomatic translations, but offer no correctness guarantees. We propose SACTOR, an LLM-driven C-to-Rust translation tool that employs a two-step process: an initial "unidiomatic" translation to preserve semantics, followed by an "idiomatic" refinement to align with Rust standards. SACTOR leverages static analysis of the C source to handle pointer semantics and dependency resolution. To validate correctness of our function-wise incremental translation that mixes C and Rust, we use end-to-end testing via the foreign function interface. We evaluate SACTOR on 200 programs from two public datasets and on two more complex scenarios (a 50-sample subset of CRust-Bench and the libogg library), comparing multiple LLMs. Across datasets, SACTOR delivers high end-to-end correctness and produces safe, idiomatic Rust with up to 7 × fewer Clippy warnings; On CRust-Bench, SACTOR achieves an average (across samples) of 85% unidiomatic and 52% idiomatic success, and on libogg it attains full unidiomatic and up to 78% idiomatic coverage on GPT-5.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to substantial progress on the Text-to-SQL task. However, existing approaches typically depend on static, pre-processed database information supplied at inference time, which restricts the model’s capacity to deeply comprehend the underlying database content. In the absence of dynamic interaction, LLMs are limited to fixed, human-curated context and lack the ability to autonomously query or explore the data. To overcome this limitation, we introduce SDE-SQL , a novel framework that empowers LLMs to perform Self-Driven Exploration of databases during inference. This is achieved through the generation and execution of SQL probes , enabling the model to actively retrieve information and iteratively refine its understanding of the database. Unlike prior methods, SDE-SQL operates in a zero-shot setting, requiring no in-context demonstrations or question-SQL pairs. Evaluated on the BIRD benchmark with Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct , SDE-SQL achieves an 8.02 % relative improvement in execution accuracy over the vanilla Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct baseline, establishing a new state-of-the-art among open-source methods without supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or model ensembling. Furthermore, when combined with SFT, SDE-SQL delivers an additional 0.52 % performance gain.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive progress across a wide range of tasks, yet their heavy reliance on English-centric training data leads to significant performance degradation in non-English languages. While existing multilingual prompting methods emphasize reformulating queries into English or enhancing reasoning capabilities, they often fail to incorporate the language- and culture-specific grounding that is essential for some queries. To address this limitation, we propose EMCEE (Extracting synthetic Multilingual Context and merging), a simple yet effective framework that enhances the multilingual capabilities of LLMs by explicitly extracting and utilizing query-relevant knowledge from the LLM itself. In particular, EMCEE first extracts synthetic context to uncover latent, language-specific knowledge encoded within the LLM, and then dynamically merges this contextual insight with reasoning-oriented outputs through a judgment-based selection mechanism. Extensive experiments on four multilingual benchmarks covering diverse languages and tasks demonstrate that EMCEE consistently outperforms prior approaches, achieving an average relative improvement of 16.4% overall and 31.7% in low-resource languages.

Abstract:
We introduce KG-MuLQA (Knowledge-Graph-based Multi-Level Question-Answer Extraction): a framework that (1) extracts QA pairs at multiple complexity levels (2) along three key dimensions – multi-hop retrieval, set operations, and answer plurality, (3) by leveraging knowledge-graph-based document representations. This approach enables fine-grained assessment of model performance across controlled difficulty levels. Using this framework, we construct a dataset of 20,139 QA pairs based on financial credit agreements and evaluate 16 proprietary and open-weight Large Language Models, observing that even the best-performing models struggle with set-based comparisons and multi-hop reasoning over long contexts. Our analysis reveals systematic failure modes tied to semantic misinterpretation and inability to handle implicit relations.

Abstract:
Text understanding application often suffers from domain shifts. To handle testing domains, domain adaptation (DA) is trained to adapt to a fixed and observed testing domain; a more challenging paradigm, test-time adaptation (TTA), cannot access the testing domain during training and online adapts to the testing samples during testing, where the samples are from a fixed domain. We aim to explore a more practical and underexplored scenario, continual test-time adaptation (CTTA) for text understanding, which involves a sequence of testing (unobserved) domains in testing. Current CTTA methods struggle in reducing error accumulation over domains and enhancing generalization to handle unobserved domains: 1) Noise-filtering reduces accumulated errors but discards useful information, and 2) accumulating historical domains enhances generalization, but it is hard to achieve adaptive accumulation. In this paper, we propose a CTTA-T (continual test-time adaptation for text understanding) framework adaptable to evolving target domains: CTTA-T adopts a teacher-student framework, where the teacher is equipped with domain awareness and generalization for evolving domains. To improve teacher predictions, we propose a refine-then-filter based on dropout-driven consistency, which calibrates predictions and removes unreliable guidance. For the adaptation–generalization trade-off, we construct a domain-aware teacher by dynamically accumulating cross-domain semantics via incremental PCA, which continuously tracks domain shifts. Experiments show CTTA-T excels baselines.

Abstract:
Large Language Model safety alignment predominantly operates on a binary assumption that requests are either safe or unsafe. This classification proves insufficient when models encounter ethical dilemmas, where the capacity to reason through moral trade-offs creates a distinct attack surface. We formalize this vulnerability through TRIAL, a multi-turn red-teaming methodology that embeds harmful requests within ethical framings. TRIAL achieves consistently high attack success rates across models by exploiting the model’s own ethical reasoning to frame harmful actions as morally necessary compromises. Building on these insights, we introduce ERR (Ethical Reasoning Robustness), a defense framework that distinguishes between instrumental responses that enable harmful outcomes and explanatory responses that analyze ethical frameworks without endorsing harmful acts. ERR employs a Layer-Stratified Harm-Gated LoRA architecture, achieving robust defense against reasoning-based attacks while preserving model utility.

Abstract:
The misuse of large language models (LLMs) requires precise detection of synthetic text. Existing works mainly follow binary or ternary classification settings, which can only distinguish pure human/LLM text or collaborative text at best. This remains insufficient for the nuanced regulation, as the LLM-polished human text and humanized LLM text often trigger different policy consequences. In this paper, we explore fine-grained LLM-generated text detection under a rigorous four-class setting. To handle such complexities, we propose RACE (Rhetorical Analysis for Creator-Editor Modeling), a fine-grained detection method that characterizes the distinct signatures of creator and editor. Specifically, RACE utilizes Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) to construct a logic graph for the creator’s foundation while extracting Elementary Discourse Unit (EDU)-level features for the editor’s style. Experiments show that RACE outperforms 12 baselines in identifying fine-grained types with low false alarms, offering a policy-aligned solution for LLM regulation.

Abstract:
Tasks such as mathematical problem solving and coding require models to leverage chain-of-thought (CoT) processes, enabling human-like reasoning strategies. However, the advancement of large reasoning models (LRMs) is hindered by the lack of comprehensive CoT datasets. Existing resources often fail to provide extensive reasoning problems with coherent CoT processes distilled from multiple teacher models, and do not account for multifaceted properties describing the internal characteristics of CoTs.To address these challenges, we introduce OmniThought, a large-scale dataset featuring 2 million CoT processes generated and validated by multiple powerful LRMs. Each CoT process in OmniThought is annotated with novel Reasoning Verbosity (RV) and Cognitive Difficulty (CD) scores, which characterize the appropriateness of CoT verbosity and the cognitive difficulty level for models to comprehend these reasoning processes. We further establish a self-reliant pipeline to curate this dataset. Extensive experiments using Qwen2.5 and Qwen3 of various sizes demonstrate the positive impact of our RV and CD scores on LRM training effectiveness. Based on the OmniThought dataset, we train and release a series of high-performing LRMs with enhanced reasoning abilities and optimized CoT output length. Our contributions advance the development of LRMs across different scales for solving complex reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Coded language is an important part of human communication. It refers to cases where users intentionally encode meaning so that the surface text differs from the intended meaning and must be decoded to be understood. Current language models handle coded language poorly. Progress has been limited by the lack of real-world datasets and clear taxonomies. This paper introduces CodedLang, a dataset of 7,744 Chinese Google Maps reviews, including 900 reviews with span-level annotations of coded language. We developed a seven-class taxonomy that captures common encoding strategies, including phonetic, orthographic, and cross-lingual substitutions. We benchmarked language models on coded language detection, classification, and review rating prediction. Results show that even strong models can fail to identify or understand coded language. Because many coded expressions rely on pronunciation-based strategies, we further conducted a phonetic analysis of coded and decoded forms. Our code and dataset are publicly available. Together, our results highlight coded language as an important and underexplored challenge for real-world NLP systems.

Abstract:
Table Question Answering (TQA) aims to answer natural language questions using tabular data, often accompanied by additional contexts, such as passages. The task spans diverse settings, varying in table representation, question/answer complexity, modality involved, and domain. While recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have driven substantial progress for TQA, the field still lacks a systematic organization and understanding of task formulations, core challenges, and methodological trends, particularly in light of emerging research directions, such as reinforcement learning. This survey addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive and structured overview of TQA research using LLMs. We introduce various task setups and summarize available benchmarks based on task features. We categorize current modeling strategies according to the challenges they target, and analyze their strengths and limitations. Furthermore, we highlight underexplored but timely topics that have not been systematically covered in prior surveys. By unifying disparate research threads and identifying open problems, our survey offers a consolidated foundation for the TQA community, enabling a deeper understanding of the state of the art and guiding future developments in this rapidly evolving area.

Abstract:
Repair, an important resource for resolving trouble in human–human conversation, remains underexplored in human–LLM interaction.In this study, we investigate how LLMs engage in the interactive process of repair in multi-turn dialogues around solvable and unsolvable math questions. We examine whether models initiate repair themselves and how they respond to user-initiated repair. Our results show strong differences across models: reactions range from being almost completely resistant to (appropriate) repair attempts to being highly susceptible and easily manipulated. We further demonstrate that once conversations extend beyond a single turn, model behavior becomes more distinctive and less predictable across systems. Overall, our findings indicate that each tested LLM exhibits its own characteristic form of unreliability in the context of repair.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines must address challenges beyond simple single-document retrieval, such as interpreting visual elements (tables, charts, images), synthesizing information across documents, and providing accurate source grounding. Existing benchmarks fail to capture this complexity, often focusing on textual data, single-document comprehension, or evaluating retrieval and generation in isolation. We introduce ViDoRe V3, a comprehensive multimodal RAG benchmark featuring multi-type queries over visually rich document corpora. It covers 10 datasets across diverse professional domains, comprising ~26,000 document pages paired with 3,099 human-verified queries, each available in 6 languages. Through 12,000 hours of human annotation effort, we provide high-quality annotations for retrieval relevance, bounding box localization, and verified reference answers. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art RAG pipelines reveals that visual retrievers outperform textual ones, late-interaction models and textual reranking substantially improve performance, and hybrid or purely visual contexts enhance answer generation quality. However, current models still struggle with non-textual elements, open-ended queries, and fine-grained visual grounding. To encourage progress in addressing these challenges, the benchmark is released under a commercially permissive license.

Abstract:
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a standard approach for aligning large language models with human preferences, yet existing methods treat all preference pairs uniformly during training. We identify two distinct sources of learning difficulty: Input Complexity (IC), capturing prompt understanding challenges, and Output Ambiguity (OA), measuring preference discrimination difficulty. Through systematic analysis, we demonstrate that these dimensions induce asymmetric learning dynamics, with IC-related competencies developing rapidly in early training while OA-related competencies emerge more gradually. Building on this observation, we propose DECOPO, a training framework that maintains separate, adaptive pacing schedules for each dimension. Experiments on UltraFeedback show that DECOPO achieves 42.3% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and 7.66 on MT-Bench, outperforming curriculum baselines by 2.1% and 0.21 points respectively, while matching full-data baseline performance with only 75% of training samples.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have advanced information extraction (IE) by enabling zero-shot and few-shot named entity recognition (NER), yet their generative outputs still show persistent and systematic errors. Despite progress through instruction fine-tuning, zero-shot NER still lags far behind supervised systems. These recurring errors mirror inconsistencies observed in early-stage human annotation processes that resolve disagreements through pilot annotation. Motivated by this analogy, we introduce DiZiNER (Disagreement-guided Instruction Refinement via Pilot Annotation Simulation for Zero-shot Named Entity Recognition), a framework that simulates the pilot annotation process, employing LLMs to act as both annotators and supervisors. Multiple heterogeneous LLMs annotate shared texts, and a supervisor model analyzes inter-model disagreements to refine task instructions. Across 18 benchmarks, DiZiNER achieves zero-shot SOTA results on 14 datasets, improving prior bests by +8.0 F1 and reducing the zero-shot to supervised gap by over +11 points. It also consistently outperforms its supervisor, GPT-5 mini, indicating that improvements stem from disagreement-guided instruction refinement rather than model capacity. Pairwise agreement between models shows a strong correlation with NER performance, further supporting this finding.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models have significantly advanced Text2SQL generation, a critical semantic gap persists: syntactically valid queries can still misinterpret user intent. To mitigate this challenge, we propose GBV-SQL, a multi-agent framework that introduces Guided Generation with SQL2Text Back-translation Validation. In particular, a dedicated validator translates generated SQL back into natural language and checks whether its logic is aligned with the original question. Beyond the method itself, we also conduct a systematic audit of benchmark quality and introduce a typology of “Gold Errors” in Text2SQL datasets. Our analysis shows that benchmark issues can coexist with strong execution accuracy and can substantially affect evaluation outcomes. On the challenging BIRD benchmark, GBV-SQL achieves 63.23% execution accuracy, a 5.8% absolute improvement over the Deepseek-v3-based MAC-SQL setting. Under manually audited benchmark corrections, GBV-SQL reaches 96.5% (dev) and 97.6% (test) on Spider, and 90.42% on repaired BIRD dev, providing a diagnostic view of model behavior under improved gold quality. Our work contributes both a practical framework for semantic validation and an empirical analysis of benchmark integrity in Text2SQL evaluation.

Abstract:
Improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) has largely relied on iterative self-training with model-generated data. While effective at boosting accuracy, existing approaches primarily reinforce successful reasoning paths, incurring a substantial calibration cost: models become overconfident and lose the ability to represent uncertainty. This failure has been characterized as a form of model collapse in alignment, where predictive distributions degenerate toward low-variance point estimates.We address this issue by reframing open-ended reasoning training as an epistemic learning problem, in which models must learn not only how to reason, but also when their reasoning should be trusted. We propose epistemically-calibrated reasoning (EpiCaR) as a training objective that jointly optimizes reasoning performance and calibration, and instantiate it within an iterative supervised fine-tuning framework using explicitly extracted meta-cognitive self-evaluation signals. Experiments on Llama-3 and Qwen-3 families demonstrate that our approach achieves Pareto-superiority over standard baselines in both accuracy and calibration, particularly in models with sufficient reasoning capacity (e.g., 3B+). This framework generalizes effectively to OOD mathematical reasoning (GSM8K) and code generation (MBPP). Ultimately, our approach enables a 3× reduction in the overall inference compute budget, matching the K=30 majority-vote performance of STaR with only K=10 confidence-weighted samples, entirely without the multi-model overhead of external verifiers.

Abstract:
Criminal investigators and intelligence analysts have developed structured analytic techniques to evaluate competing hypotheses under incomplete information. This study examines whether such human expert investigative methodologies are also effective for narrative-based culprit inference in large language models (LLMs). Focusing on the task of analyzing evidence from complex narratives and identifying the perpetrator among suspects, we conducted experiments on 10 LLMs using the MuSR murder mystery benchmark. The PRISM framework, which applies investigative techniques, consistently outperformed existing general-purpose strategies across all models, with its effectiveness manifesting regardless of model scale. Ablation studies revealed that the hypothesis structuring stage is particularly crucial, accounting for 89% of the methodological improvement beyond information filtering. This suggests that domain-specific structures that specify “what to analyze” are more effective in LLM reasoning than simply increasing the number of reasoning paths.

Abstract:
Geometry problem solving (GPS) poses significant challenges for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in diagram comprehension, knowledge application, long-step reasoning, and auxiliary line construction. However, current benchmarks lack fine-grained evaluation for long-step problems necessitating auxiliary construction. To address these limitations, we present GeoLaux, a fine-grained annotated dataset comprising 2186 calculation and proof problems. It features long-step reasoning (with an average solution length of 6.51 steps, maximum of 24 steps) and auxiliary line construction (required in 41.8% of problems). Building on the dataset, we conduct a comprehensive five-dimensional evaluation of 23 leading MLLMs. The evaluation yields three pivotal findings: First, models perform significantly worse on long-step problems compared to short-step ones, with 18 models exhibiting a performance drop of over 50%. Second, it is crucial to enhance models’ understanding, awareness, and proficiency in auxiliary line construction, which is vital for overall geometric reasoning. Third, limited answer hints effectively improve process correctness, whereas explicit answers lead models to neglect intermediate reasoning steps. These findings position GeoLaux both to benchmark MLLMs geometry reasoning abilities and to guide their improvement. Data and code are available at https://github.com/Candice-yu/GeoLaux

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, yet evaluations focus primarily on task success rather than cultural appropriateness or evaluator reliability. We introduce LiveCultureBench, a multi-cultural, dynamic benchmark that embeds LLMs as agents in a simulated town and evaluates them on both task completion and adherence to socio-cultural norms. The simulation models a small city as a location graph with synthetic residents having diverse demographic and cultural profiles. Each episode assigns one resident a daily goal while others provide social context. An LLM-based verifier generates structured judgments on norm violations and task progress, which we aggregate into metrics capturing task-norm trade-offs and verifier uncertainty. Using LiveCultureBench across models and cultural profiles, we study (i) cross-cultural robustness of LLM agents, (ii) how they balance effectiveness against norm sensitivity, and (iii) when LLM-as-a-judge evaluation is reliable for automated benchmarking versus when human oversight is needed.

Abstract:
Recent progress in Large Language Model (LLM) based Table Question Answering (TableQA) has demonstrated strong performance on standard benchmarks. However, existing benchmarks mainly focus on well-structured tables and fail to reflect the irregular structures and complex reasoning commonly encountered in real-world scenarios. We propose CompTab, a benchmark designed to evaluate TableQA under complex reasoning and irregular table conditions. CompTab covers six representative types, including semantic ambiguity, multi-hop reasoning, transposed tables, merged cells, missing values, and outliers. It is constructed from real-world seed tables across multiple domains using controlled LLM based generation and human verification to ensure realism and diversity. In addition, to improve the generalization of LLMs under complex and irregular table settings, we propose a two-stage training framework that progressively aligns models with textual reasoning and executable decision signals, instantiated as CompTabLLM. Evaluations on 38 representative LLMs and CompTabLLM show clear limitations of existing LLMs under realistic conditions, while the proposed framework improves generalization. CompTab thus provides a challenging benchmark for advancing TableQA in real-world.

Abstract:
Mainstream multilingual LLMs are generally trained on a much higher proportion of English than multilingual data, raising questions about their ability to capture linguistic features particular to non-English languages or to capture information important to non-anglophone cultures. We add to a growing effort to increase multilingual sensitivity in LLMs by developing a benchmark, EIFFEL, testing mastery of French idiomatic expressions in context. We fully explain the methodology, which exploits input from native French speakers, to make it reproducible for other languages. We compare mainstream multilingual LLMs with French-focused LLMs both on standard LLM benchmarks and EIFFEL; EIFFEL brings out the benefits of higher proportions of French data and shows limitations of standard benchmarks for measuring multilingual competence.

Abstract:
Multimodal LLMs are increasingly deployed as perceptual backbones for autonomous agents in 3D environments, from robotics to virtual worlds. These applications require agents to perceive rapid state changes, attribute actions to the correct entities, and reason about concurrent multi-agent behaviors from a first-person perspective, capabilities that existing benchmarks do not adequately evaluate. We introduce GameplayQA, a framework for evaluating agentic-centric perception and reasoning through video understanding. Specifically, we densely annotate multiplayer 3D gameplay videos at 1.22 labels/second, with time-synced, concurrent captions of states, actions, and events structured around a triadic system of Self, Other Agents, and the World, a natural decomposition for multi-agent environments. From these annotations, we refined 2.4K diagnostic QA pairs organized into three levels of cognitive complexity, accompanied by a structured distractor taxonomy that enables fine-grained analysis of where models hallucinate. Evaluation of frontier MLLMs reveals a substantial gap from human performance, with common failures in temporal and cross-video grounding, agent-role attribution, and handling the decision density of the game. We hope GameplayQA stimulates future research at the intersection of embodied AI, agentic perception, and world modeling.

Abstract:
Multimodal representation learning primarily relies on contrastive objectives such as InfoNCE to align diverse modalities. However, these methods focus almost exclusively on directional alignment and often neglect the intrinsic role of embedding magnitudes (L2-norm) in the contrastive process. To bridge this gap, we propose L2Dir, a plug-and-play framework designed to optimize L2-norm alignment and Directional consistency jointly. As a highly efficient solution, L2Dir doesn’t require extra data, distillation, or external supervision. It can be integrated seamlessly into existing pipelines by employing a lightweight MLP to reconstruct magnitudes from frozen backbone features. Extensive evaluations across 95 tasks using UniIR and VLM2Vec-V2 frameworks demonstrate that L2Dir yields consistent and significant performance gains over established baselines across various backbones and scales, proving that explicit magnitude modeling is a versatile and potent strategy for refining unsupervised multimodal representations. The source code for L2Dir in VLM2Vec-V2 is available in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can carry out human-like dialogue, but unlike humans, they are stateless due to the superposition property. However, during multi-turn, multi-agent interactions, LLMs begin to exhibit consistent, character-like behaviors—hinting at a form of emergent lifelong learning. Despite this, existing benchmarks often fail to capture these dynamics, primarily focusing on static, open-ended evaluations. To address this gap, we introduce LifeState-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in LLMs. It features two episodic datasets—Hamlet and a synthetic script collection—rich in narrative structure and character interactions. Our fact-checking evaluation probes models’ self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches. Experiments on models like Llama3.1-8B, GPT-4-turbo, and DeepSeek R1, we demonstrate that non-parametric methods significantly outperform parametric ones in managing stateful learning. However, all models exhibit challenges with catastrophic forgetting as interactions extend, highlighting the need for further advancements in lifelong learning.

Abstract:
The linguistic proximity between Galician, Portuguese, and Spanish results in a lexical overlap that often conceals semantic interference. This is particularly evident in false friends, posing a challenge for NLP systems.In this work, we assess whether state-of-the-art language models can identify and process false friends among these languages. We introduce six cross-lingual datasets –created manually or using semi-automatic methods, with all instances being carefully verified– covering cognates and false friends. We evaluate a broad range of encoder and decoder models of varying sizes via zero-shot and few-shot settings. Our results highlight the challenging nature of the task, but also show the clear progress made by LLMs in recent years, particularly those of a larger size, with smaller language models struggling on the task. Notably, unlike other tasks where language distance poses additional challenges, we find that linguistic proximity itself introduces errors: closely related language pairs tend to perform worse, reflecting the challenge of semantic discrimination due to lexical overlap.

Abstract:
True general intelligence requires not only a model of the physical world but also a social world model: the capacity to infer how individual mental states interact and crystallize into group-level outcomes. Despite notable progress in individual-level Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning, existing multimodal large language models systematically fail at this: collective behavior emerges non-linearly from social tensions, conformity dynamics, and structural constraints, and cannot be recovered by summing individual intentions. We present GroupToM-Bench, the first multimodal benchmark for group-level ToM, built around a causal chain spanning micro-level BDI states (belief, desire, intention), meso-level group tension and structural constraints, and macro-level outcome prediction and mechanistic attribution. To probe this full arc, we develop a seven-level cognitive audit framework. Experiments reveal that frontier models perform significantly below human levels, exposing fundamental blind spots in modeling social structures and nonlinear collective behavior.

Abstract:
Online safety in low-resource languages hinges not only on accurate hate speech detection but also on transparent, culturally grounded explanations. Yet prior works in Bangla largely focus on hate classification, while overlooking interpretability. We address this gap by introducing BanHADEX, the first hate explainability dataset in Bangla with human-annotated labels. BanHADEX contains 19,203 YouTube comments spanning April 2024–June 2025, annotated for binary hate classification with seven fine-grained hate categories, seven target groups, and concise explanations for each sample. Our data pipeline relies on a two-stage annotation protocol that uses majority voting for robust labeling. Our rich suite of experiments on open and closed-source LLMs reveals that explanation-guided LoRA substantially outperforms both classification and explanation quality across prompting and fine-tuning strategies. BanHADEX establishes the groundworks for faithful interpretability and safer moderation in linguistically rich yet under-resourced languages.

Abstract:
User interface (UI) design goes beyond visuals to shape user experience (UX), underscoring the shift toward UI/UX as a unified concept. While recent studies have explored UI evaluation using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), they largely focus on surface-level features, overlooking how design choices influence user behavior at scale. To fill this gap, we introduce WiserUI-Bench, a novel benchmark for multimodal understanding of how UI/UX design affects user behavior, built on 300 real-world UI image pairs from industry A/B tests, with empirically validated winners that induced more user actions. For future design progress in practice, post-hoc understanding of why such winners succeed with mass users is also required; we support this via expert-curated key interpretations for each instance. Experiments across multiple MLLMs on WiserUI-Bench for two main tasks, (1) predicting the more effective UI image between an A/B-tested pair, and (2) explaining it post-hoc in alignment with expert interpretations, show that models exhibit limited understanding of the behavioral impact of UI/UX design. We believe our work will foster research on leveraging MLLMs for visual design in user behavior contexts.

Abstract:
Logical vulnerabilities in software stem from flaws in program logic rather than memory safety, which can lead to critical security failures. Although existing automated program-repair techniques primarily focus on repairing memory-corruption vulnerabilities, they struggle with logical vulnerabilities because of their limited semantic understanding of the vulnerable code and its expected behavior. On the other hand, recent successes of large language models (LLMs) in understanding and repairing code are promising. However, no framework currently exists to analyze the capabilities and limitations of such techniques for logical vulnerabilities. We aim to systematically evaluate both traditional and LLM-based repair approaches for addressing real-world logical vulnerabilities. To facilitate our assessment, we created the first-ever dataset, LogicDS, comprising 122 logical vulnerabilities that reflect tangible security impact. We also developed a systematic framework, LogicEval, to evaluate patches for logical vulnerabilities. Evaluations suggest that compilation and testing failures are primarily driven by prompt sensitivity, loss of code context, and difficulty in patch localization.

Abstract:
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) is reshaping multimodel models, with speech synthesis being a prominent application. However, existing approaches often underutilize the linguistic intelligence of these models, typically failing to leverage their powerful instruction-following capabilities. This limitation hinders the model’s ability to follow text instructions for controllable Text-to-Speech (TTS). To address this, we propose a new paradigm inspired by operationalism that decouples instruction understanding from speech generation. We introduce BatonVoice, a framework where an LLM acts as a conductor, understanding user instructions and generating a textual plan – explicit vocal features (e.g., pitch, energy). A separate TTS model, the orchestra, then generates the speech from these features. To realize this component, we develop BatonTTS, a TTS model trained specifically for this task. Our experiments demonstrate that BatonVoice achieves strong performance in controllable and emotional speech synthesis, outperforming strong open- and closed-source baselines. Notably, our approach enables remarkable zero-shot cross-lingual generalization, accurately applying feature control abilities to languages unseen during post-training. This demonstrates that objectifying speech into textual vocal features can more effectively unlock the linguistic intelligence of LLMs.

Abstract:
Recently, we have often observed hallucinated citations or references that do not correspond to any existing work in papers under review, preprints, or published papers. Such hallucinated citations pose a serious concern to scientific reliability. When they appear in accepted papers, they may also negatively affect the credibility of conferences. In this study, we refer to hallucinated citations as “HalluCitation” and systematically investigate their prevalence and impact. We analyze all papers published at ACL, NAACL, and EMNLP in 2024 and 2025, including main conference, Findings, and workshop papers. Our analysis reveals that nearly 300 papers contain at least one HalluCitation, most of which were published in 2025. Notably, half of these papers were identified at EMNLP 2025, the most recent conference, indicating that this issue is rapidly increasing. Moreover, more than 100 such papers were accepted as main conference and Findings papers at EMNLP 2025, affecting the credibility.

Abstract:
Multimodal language models (MLMs) increasingly demonstrate human-like communication, yet their use of everyday perspectival words remains poorly understood. To address this gap, we compare humans and MLMs in their use of three word types, which we predict impose increasing cognitive demands: vocabulary (e.g., ’boat’ or ’cup’), possessives (e.g., ’mine’ vs. ’yours’), and demonstratives (e.g., ’this one’ vs. ’that one’). Testing seven MLMs against human participants, we find that perspectival words are harder than vocabulary words for both groups. The gap is even larger for MLMs: while models approach human-level performance on using vocabulary, they exhibit clear deficits with possessives and even greater difficulties with demonstratives. Ablation analyses point to limitations in perspective-taking and spatial reasoning as key sources of these gaps in MLMs. Instruction-based prompting helps close the gap for possessives but still leaves demonstratives far below human performance. These results show that, unlike vocabulary, perspectival words pose a greater challenge in human communication—and this difficulty is further amplified in MLMs, revealing a crucial shortfall in their pragmatic and social-cognitive abilities.

Abstract:
Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. LLM’s performance in thousand-words level and open-ended writing is inadequately assessed by traditional reference-based metrics or modern LLM-as-a-judge methods. We propose Tree-of-Writing (ToW), to resolve the implicit inconsistency often found when LLM-as-a-judge aggregates all sub-features in text evaluation. ToW incorporates a tree-structured workflow by explicitly modeling the aggregation weights of sub-features. We also present HowToBench, a large-scale Chinese writing benchmark encompassing 12 genres and 1302 instructions across three task categories: contextual completion, outline-guided writing, and open-ended generation. ToW successfully mitigates the biases, achieving a 0.93 Pearson correlation with human judgments. Furthermore, we detect that both overlap-based text generation metrics and popular LLM-as-a-judge practices are vulnerable to textual disturbances, while ToW is robust to them. We also uncover a negative correlation between input length and content-related scores in the Guide task, showcasing that it cannot be simply improved by input-side information piling.

Abstract:
Agents based on large language models (LLMs) struggle with brainless trial-and-error and generating hallucinatory actions due to a lack of global planning in long-horizon tasks. In this paper, we introduce a plan-and-execute framework and propose EAGLET, an efficient and effective planner training method to enhance the executor agent’s planning abilities without human effort. Specifically, we train a plug-and-play global planner through a two-step process: we first synthesize high-quality plans from an advanced LLM using our proposed homologous consensus filtering strategy, and apply fine-tuning as a cold start. Moreover, we further improve the planner with a rule-based reinforcement learning stage using a novel executor capability gain reward, ensuring it can handle task instructions of varying difficulty. Experiments on three long-horizon agent tasks show that executor agents equipped with our planner outperform existing methods, achieving new state-of-the-art performance. Meanwhile, EAGLET reduces training costs by 8× compared to RL-based baselines, and it does not require manual effort or extra training data, offering an efficient and effective solution.

Abstract:
Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) enables hardware-agnostic LLM compression via low-rank approximation, yet optimal rank allocation remains a bottleneck. Existing methods predominantly derive layer importance from performance-oriented proxies. Yet, these metrics fail to distinguish between representational importance and structural compressibility, consequently obscuring the fine-grained influence of spectral distribution shape. We demonstrate this disconnect through spectral analysis, revealing that layers with similar information capacity can exhibit markedly different singular value decay behaviors, corresponding to varying degrees of redundancy in the spectral tail. This imperfect coupling implies that allocation strategies driven solely by importance leave significant compression opportunities underexploited. To address this gap, we propose HiSVD, a hierarchical rank allocation framework with two stages: (1) Capacity-Anchored Baseline Allocation, which preserves representational stability by aligning rank budgets with information capacity; and (2) Redundancy-Aware Refinement, which modulates this baseline using tail redundancy to penalize structural excess. Experiments on LLMs demonstrate that HiSVD achieves superior compression efficiency, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by effectively exploiting this spectral heterogeneity.

Abstract:
Evaluating the multilingual and multicultural capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for their global utility. However, current benchmarks face three critical limitations: (1) fragmented evaluation dimensions that often neglect deep cultural nuances; (2) insufficient language coverage in subjective tasks relying on low-quality machine translation; and (3) shallow analysis that lacks diagnostic depth beyond simple rankings. To address these, we introduce GaoYao, a comprehensive benchmark with 182.3k samples, 26 languages and 51 nations/areas. First, GaoYao proposes a unified framework categorizing evaluation tasks into three cultural layers (General Multilingual, Cross-cultural, Monocultural) and nine cognitive sub-layers. Second, we achieve native-quality expansion by leveraging experts to rigorously localize subjective benchmarks into 19 languages and synthesizing cross-cultural test sets for 34 cultures, surpassing prior coverage by up to 111%. Third, we conduct an in-depth diagnostic analysis on 20+ flagship and compact LLMs. Our findings reveal significant geographical performance disparities and distinct gaps between tasks, offering a reliable map for future work. We release the benchmark.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in general tasks but struggle with specialized, structured cultural symbols. We introduce BoYaEval, the first comprehensive benchmark dedicated to deciphering diverse Ancient Chinese musical notations, including five types of ancient Chinese music notation systems. These systems utilize unique spatial layouts and specialized ideograms to encode pitch and intricate playing techniques. BoYaEval comprises 3,175 high-quality images across these notation styles and establishes a three-tier evaluation: Structural Parsing (symbol recognition), Instructional Translation (technique mapping), and Musical Reasoning (melody derivation). We evaluate 21 leading MLLMs. Results indicate that while models perform adequately in basic recognition, they fail in cross-system compositional logic, scoring only around 27% on reasoning tasks. BoYaEval highlights the limitations of current MLLMs in processing diverse spatial-symbolic dependencies, bridging the gap between ancient wisdom and modern AI for digitizing intangible cultural heritage. The BoYaEval benchmark is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/MYTH-Lab/BoYaEval.

Abstract:
Assessing the reliability of Large Language Models (LLMs) by confidence elicitation is a prominent approach to AI safety in high-stakes applications, such as healthcare and finance. Existing methods either require expensive computational overhead or suffer from poor calibration, making them impractical and unreliable for real-world deployment. In this work, we propose GrACE, a Generative Approach to Confidence Elicitation that enables scalable and reliable confidence elicitation for LLMs. GrACE adopts a novel mechanism in which the model expresses confidence by the similarity between the last hidden state and the embedding of a special token appended to the vocabulary, in real-time. We fine-tune the model for calibrating the confidence with targets associated with accuracy. Extensive experiments show that the confidence produced by GrACE achieves the best discriminative capacity and calibration on open-ended generation tasks without resorting to additional sampling or an auxiliary model. Moreover, we propose two confidence-based strategies for test-time scaling with GrACE, which not only improve the accuracy of the final decision but also significantly reduce the number of required samples, highlighting its potential as a practical solution for deploying LLMs with reliable, on-the-fly confidence estimation. The code is available at: https://github.com/petezone/Grace.

Abstract:
Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) excel in video understanding but suffer from high inference latency due to autoregressive generation. Speculative Decoding (SD) mitigates this by applying a draft-and-verify paradigm, yet existing methods are constrained by rigid exact-match rules, severely limiting the acceleration potential. To bridge this gap, we propose LVSpec, the first training-free loosely SD framework tailored for Video-LLMs. Grounded in the insight that generation is governed by sparse visual-relevant anchors (mandating strictness) amidst abundant visual-irrelevant fillers (permitting loose verification), LVSpec employs a lightweight visual-relevant token identification scheme to accurately pinpoint the former. To further maximize acceptance, we augment this with a position-shift tolerant mechanism that effectively salvages positionally mismatched but semantically equivalent tokens. Experiments demonstrate that LVSpec is high-fidelity and rapid: it preserves >99.8 % of target performance while accelerating Qwen2.5-VL-32B by 2.70 × and LLaVA-OneVision-72B by 2.94 × . Notably, it boosts the mean accepted length and speedup ratio by 136% and 35% compared to SOTA training-free SD methods for Video-LLMs. Code is provided in the submitted software.

Abstract:
Forced alignment (FA) predicts start and end timestamps for words or characters in speech, but existing methods are language-specific and prone to cumulative temporal shifts. The multilingual speech understanding and long-sequence processing abilities of speech large language models (SLLMs) make them promising for FA in multilingual, crosslingual, and long-form speech settings. However, directly applying the next-token prediction paradigm of SLLMs to FA results in hallucinations and slow inference. To bridge the gap, we propose LLM-ForcedAligner, reformulating FA as a slot-filling paradigm: timestamps are treated as discrete indices, and special timestamp tokens are inserted as slots into the transcript. Conditioned on the speech embeddings and the transcript with slots, the SLLM directly predicts the time indices at slots. During training, causal attention masking with non-shifted input and label sequences allows each slot to predict its own timestamp index based on itself and preceding context, with loss computed only at slot positions. Dynamic slot insertion enables FA at arbitrary positions. Moreover, non-autoregressive inference is supported, avoiding hallucinations and improving speed. Experiments across multilingual, crosslingual, and long-form speech scenarios show that LLM-ForcedAligner achieves a 69% 78% relative reduction in accumulated averaging shift compared with prior methods. The checkpoint and inference code will be released later.

Abstract:
Expanding Large Language Models(LLMs) to new languages is a costly endeavor, demanding extensive Continued Pre-Training(CPT) and data-intensive alignment. While recent data-free merging techniques attempt to bypass alignment by fusing a multilingual CPT-enhanced model with its instruct counterpart, they are plagued by a critical trade-off: mitigating parameter conflicts to preserve original abilities inevitably dilutes new language acquisition, and vice-versa. To resolve this conflict, we introduce , which upcycles a dense model into a Mixture-of-Experts(MoE) architecture, allocating different experts to different languages. Alignment ability is then transferred by grafting a MoE-expanded parameter delta( 𝛥 instruct ) to the CPT-enhanced base model, bypassing the complex alignment phase. Experiments demonstrate ’s superiority even against baselines with similar FLOPs or number of parameters; it improves performance on expanded languages while effectively preserving original capabilities. We further show our approach is highly applicable across different models and Post-training deltas.

Abstract:
Developing agents capable of navigating fragmented, multi-source information remains challenging, primarily due to the scarcity of benchmarks reflecting hybrid workflows combining database querying with external APIs. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReCoQA, a large-scale benchmark of 29,270 real-estate instances featuring machine-verifiable supervision for intermediate steps, including structured intent labels, SQL queries, and API calls. Complementarily, we propose HIRE-Agent, a hierarchical framework instantiating an understand–plan–execute architecture as a strong baseline. By orchestrating a Front-end parser, a planning Supervisor, and execution Specialists, HIRE-Agent effectively integrates heterogeneous evidence. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HIRE-Agent constitutes a strong baseline and substantiates the necessity of hierarchical collaboration for complex, real-world reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have increasingly assisted in historical tasks such as text processing, their capacity for professional-level historical reasoning remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily assess basic knowledge breadth or lexical understanding, failing to capture the higher-order skills—such as evidentiary reasoning—that are central to historical research. To fill this gap, we introduce ProHist-Bench, a novel benchmark anchored in the Chinese Imperial Examination (Keju) system—a comprehensive microcosm of East Asian political, social, and intellectual history spanning over 1,300 years. Developed through deep interdisciplinary collaboration, ProHist-Bench features 400 challenging, expert-curated questions across eight dynasties, accompanied by 10,891 fine-grained evaluation rubrics. Through a rigorous evaluation of 18 LLMs, we reveal a significant proficiency gap: even state-of-the-art LLMs struggle with complex historical research questions. We hope ProHist-Bench will facilitate the development of domain-specific reasoning LLMs, advance computational historical research, and further uncover the untapped potential of LLMs. We release ProHist-Bench at https://github.com/inclusionAI/ABench/tree/main/ProHist-Bench.

Abstract:
Recognizing semantic differences across documents is crucial for text generation evaluation and content alignment, especially in cross-lingual settings. However, as a standalone task, it has received little attention. We address this by introducing SwissGov-RSD, the first naturalistic, document-level, cross-lingual dataset for semantic difference recognition. It encompasses a total of 224 multi-parallel documents in English–German, English–French, and English–Italian with token-level difference annotations by human annotators.We evaluate a variety of open-source and closed-source large language models as well as encoder models across different fine-tuning settings on this new benchmark. Our results show that current automatic approaches perform poorly compared to their performance on monolingual, sentence-level, and synthetic benchmarks, revealing a considerable gap for both LLMs and encoder models.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has catalyzed a leap in Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, yet its optimization dynamics remain fragile. Standard algorithms like GRPO enforce stability via "hard clipping", which inadvertently stifles exploration by discarding gradients of tokens outside the trust region. While recent "soft clipping" methods attempt to recover these gradients, they suffer from a critical challenge: relying on log-probability gradient ( ∇𝜃 log 𝜋𝜃 ) yields divergent weights as probabilities vanish, destabilizing LLM training. We rethink this convention by establishing probability gradient ( ∇𝜃 𝜋𝜃 ) as the superior optimization primitive. Accordingly, we propose Decoupled Gradient Policy Optimization (DGPO), which employs a decoupled decay mechanism based on importance sampling ratios. By applying asymmetric, continuous decay to boundary tokens, DGPO resolves the conflict between stability and sustained exploration. Extensive experiments across DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen series models (1.5B/7B/14B) demonstrate that DGPO consistently outperforms strong baselines on various mathematical benchmarks, offering a robust and scalable solution for RLVR. Our code and implementation are available at: https://github.com/FlyTune/DGPO-RL.

Abstract:
Research on cross-dialectal transfer from a standard to a non-standard dialect variety has typically focused on text data. However, dialects are primarily spoken, and non-standard spellings cause issues in text processing. We compare standard-to-dialect transfer in three settings: text models, speech models, and cascaded systems where speech first gets automatically transcribed and then further processed by a text model. We focus on German dialects in the context of written and spoken intent classification – releasing the first dialectal audio intent classification dataset – with supporting experiments on topic classification. The speech-only setup provides the best results on the dialect data while the text-only setup works best on the standard data. While the cascaded systems lag behind the text-only models for German, they perform relatively well on the dialectal data if the transcription system generates normalized, standard-like output.

Abstract:
Models employing long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have shown superior performance on complex reasoning tasks. Yet, this capability introduces a critical and often overlooked inefficiency—overthinking—models often engage in unnecessarily extensive reasoning even for simple queries, incurring significant computations without accuracy improvements. While prior work has explored solutions to mitigate overthinking, a fundamental gap remains in our understanding of its underlying causes. Most existing analyses are limited to superficial, profiling-based observations, failing to delve into LLMs’ inner workings. This study introduces a systematic, fine-grained analyzer of LLMs’ thought process to bridge the gap, TRACE. We first benchmark the overthinking issue, confirming that long-thinking models are five to twenty times slower on simple tasks with no substantial gains. We then use TRACE to first decompose the thought process into minimally complete sub-thoughts. Next, by inferring discourse relationships among sub-thoughts, we construct granular thought progression graphs and subsequently identify common thinking patterns for topically similar queries. Our analysis reveals two major patterns for open-weight thinking models—Explorer and Late Landing. This finding provides evidence that over-verification and over-exploration are the primary drivers of overthinking in LLMs. Grounded in thought structures, we propose a utility-based definition of overthinking, which moves beyond length-based metrics. This revised definition offers a more insightful understanding of LLMs’ thought progression, as well as practical guidelines for principled overthinking management.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by end users, yet existing personalization methods relying on static profiles or text-only signals fail to capture query-specific expertise variation. We present ExPerT, a query-wise personalization framework that adapts LLM responses to users’ query domain expertise by combining semantic and behavioral cues. ExPerT consists of two key components: (i) a semantic–behavioral expertise inference module that jointly interprets query text and keystroke dynamics via in-context LLM prompting, and (ii) an expertise-conditioned response generation that adapts the level of detail, terminology, and conceptual complexity. Our user study with 40 participants and 1270 queries demonstrated that ExPerT reduced expertise inference error by 65.7% compared to the strongest baseline (MAE = 0.398 vs. 1.162) and improved response satisfaction by 17.52% (from 3.71 to 4.36) on a 5-point Likert scale.

Abstract:
Various studies have pointed out that the performance of language models is poor in non-English or non-European languages. One of the factors affecting this performance is the effectiveness and suitability of the tokenization scheme used in the model. Indic scripts require multiple Unicode codepoints to represent a single visual unit to be encoded in the standard UTF-8 scheme. This paper investigates the effect of multiple tokenizers that use UTF-8 text input on the downstream performance of pretrained language models for Hindi and Marathi, languages written in Devanāgari script. We present the intrinsic performance of the tokenizers using Fertility, Rényi Efficiency and Percentile Frequency, and report the extrinsic performance of monolingual and multilingual models on question-answering tasks, using an automated parts-of-speech and sentence similarity based evaluation framework, and on word-level tasks such as grapheme-to-phoneme conversion and transliteration. We propose a grapheme cluster tokenizer for the script which shows performance better than or competitive with other popular tokenizers. We also find that the Rényi Efficiency metric is highly correlated to downstream performance on question answering.

Abstract:
Coreference Resolution (CR) is a critical task in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Current research faces a key dilemma: whether to further explore the potential of supervised neural methods based on small language models, whose detect-then-cluster pipeline still delivers top performance, or embrace the powerful capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, effectively combining their strengths remains underexplored. To this end, we propose ImCoref-CeS , a novel framework that integrates an enhanced supervised model with LLM-based reasoning. First, we present an improved CR method ( ImCoref ) to push the performance boundaries of the supervised neural method by introducing a lightweight bridging module to enhance long-text encoding capability, devising a biaffine scorer to comprehensively capture positional information, and invoking a hybrid mention regularization to improve training efficiency. Importantly, we employ an LLM acting as a multi-role Checker-Splitter agent to validate candidate mentions (filtering out invalid ones) and coreference results (splitting erroneous clusters) predicted by ImCoref. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of ImCoref-CeS, which achieves superior performance compared to existing state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly capable web agents, yet training such agents still relies on high-quality interaction trajectories that are difficult to obtain at scale. We identify two key challenges: (1) Infrastructure Overhead, where network instability and website access restrictions limit data collection scalability; and (2) Constrained Exploration, where irreversible state transitions preclude tree-based search and thus limit trajectory diversity. To address these challenges, we introduce WebSynthesis, a framework for scalable trajectory synthesis. WebSynthesis employs an LLM-based World Model to simulate state transitions without network dependencies, and integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search to enable reversible exploration over the simulated state space. Experiments on WebArena, WebVoyager, and Mind2Web-Online demonstrate that agents trained exclusively on synthesized trajectories outperform those trained on real-world data, providing a viable alternative to costly real-world data collection.

Abstract:
The growing use of large language models (LLMs) in peer review threatens scholarly integrity. Recent conference policies allow AI tools for language polishing but prohibit their use for generating substantive content. However, existing detectors mainly rely on stylistic cues, making it difficult to distinguish between surface-level language refinement and genuine content generation. To address this, we advocate a content-based detection paradigm and introduce CoCoNUTS, a comprehensive benchmark containing 315,535 reviews covering leading AI conferences and six human-AI collaboration modes. Our evaluation shows that current detectors struggle to handle these nuanced settings. Consequently, we propose CoCoDet, an AI review detector designed to identify substantive AI-generation. Experiments demonstrate that CoCoDet achieves a macro F1-score of 98.24%. Crucially, on permissible machine-polished reviews, it maintains a low false positive rate of 3.89%, substantially outperforming the strongest baseline (7.84%). Examination on real-world reviews using CoCoDet reveals an escalating trend of substantive AI generation. Our work exposes the inadequacy of current detectors, underscoring the importance of domain-specific solutions.

Abstract:
Whether Large Language Models (LLMs) truly possess human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities has garnered increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks remain largely restricted to narrow paradigms like false belief tasks, failing to capture the full spectrum of human cognitive mechanisms. We introduce CogToM, a comprehensive, theoretically grounded benchmark comprising over 8000 bilingual instances across 46 paradigms, validated by 49 human annotators. A systematic evaluation of 22 representative models, including frontier models like GPT-5.1 and Qwen3-Max, reveals significant performance heterogeneities and highlights persistent bottlenecks in specific dimensions. Further analysis based on human cognitive patterns suggests potential divergences between LLM and human cognitive structures. CogToM offers a robust instrument and perspective for investigating the evolving cognitive boundaries of LLMs. We release our code and data at https://github.com/Beijing-AISI/CogToM.

Abstract:
Continual instruction tuning (CIT) requires multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to adapt to a stream of tasks without forgetting prior capabilities. A common strategy is to isolate updates by routing inputs to different LoRA experts. However, existing LoRA-based Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) methods often jointly update the router and experts in an indiscriminate way, causing the router’s preferences to co-drift with experts’ adaptation pathways and gradually deviate from early-stage input–expert specialization. We term this as Misaligned Co-drift, which blurs expert responsibilities and exacerbates forgetting. To address this, we introduce the pathway activation subspace (PASs), a LoRA-induced subspace that reflects which low-rank pathway directions an input activates in each expert, providing a capability-aligned coordinate system for routing and preservation. Based on PASs, we propose a fixed-capacity PASs-based MoE–LoRA method with two components: PAS-guided Reweighting, which calibrates routing using each expert’s pathway activation signals, and PAS-aware Rank Stabilization, which selectively stabilizes rank directions important to previous tasks. Experiments on a CIT benchmark show that our approach consistently outperforms a range of conventional continual learning baselines and MoE–LoRA variants in both accuracy and resistance to forgetting, without increasing model parameters. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/yueluoshuangtian/PASs-MoE .

Abstract:
Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) are largely restricted to high- or mid-resource languages, and often evaluate performance on higher-order tasks in reasoning and generation. However, plenty of evidence points to the fact that LLMs lack basic linguistic competence in the vast majority of the world’s 3800+ written languages. We introduce ChiKhaPo, consisting of eight subtasks of varying difficulty designed to evaluate the lexical comprehension and generation abilities of generative models. ChiKhaPo draws on existing lexicons, monolingual data, and bitext, and provides coverage for 2700+ languages for two word-translation-based subtasks, surpassing any existing benchmark in terms of language coverage. We further show that six SOTA models struggle on our benchmark, and discuss the factors contributing to performance scores, including language family, language resourcedness, task, and comprehension versus generation directions. With ChiKhaPo, we hope to enable and encourage the massively multilingual benchmarking of LLMs.

Abstract:
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) for Visual Question Answering (VQA) often suffer from dual limitations: knowledge hallucination and insufficient fine-grained visual perception. Crucially, we identify that commonsense graphs and scene graphs provide precisely complementary solutions to these respective deficiencies by providing rich external knowledge and capturing fine-grained visual details. However, prior works typically treat them in isolation, overlooking their synergistic potential. To bridge this gap, we propose KG-ViP, a unified framework that empowers MLLMs by fusing scene graphs and commonsense graphs. The core of the KG-ViP framework is a novel retrieval-and-fusion pipeline that utilizes the query as a semantic bridge to progressively integrate both graphs, synthesizing a unified structured context that facilitates reliable multi-modal reasoning. Extensive experiments on FVQA 2.0+ and MVQA benchmarks demonstrate that KG-ViP significantly outperforms existing VQA methods.

Abstract:
This paper investigates whether LMs recruit shared computational mechanisms for general Theory of Mind (ToM) and language-specific pragmatic reasoning in order to contribute to the general question of whether LMs may be said to have emergent "social world models", i.e., representations of mental states that are repurposed across tasks (the functional integration hypothesis). Using behavioral evaluations and causal-mechanistic experiments via functional localization methods inspired by cognitive neuroscience, we analyze LMs’ performance across seven subcategories of ToM abilities (Beaudoin et al., 2020) on a substantially larger localizer dataset than used in prior like-minded work. Results from stringent hypothesis-driven statistical testing offer suggestive evidence for the functional integration hypothesis, indicating that LMs may develop interconnected "social world models" rather than isolated competencies. This work contributes novel ToM localizer data, methodological refinements to functional localization techniques, and empirical insights into the emergence of social cognition in artificial systems.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of natural language processing tasks, yet their performance remains heavily biased toward high-resource languages. Tibetan, despite its cultural significance and large speaker population, is still substantially underrepresented. In this work, we present a comprehensive pipeline for advancing Tibetan language modeling through large-scale data curation and continual pre-training. We construct a 72 GB high-quality Tibetan corpus, the largest to date, and adapt Qwen2.5-7B through balanced multilingual continual pre-training with Tibetan, Chinese, and English, followed by multilingual instruction tuning. To further scale capacity efficiently, we extend the dense model to a 50B-A10B Mixture-of-Experts architecture. Due to the absence of standardized Tibetan benchmarks, we build multiple evaluation datasets via high-quality translation and human verification. Experimental results show that both dense and MoE models consistently outperform existing open-source and Tibetan-focused models of similar scale across diverse tasks. Our work advances Tibetan-centric LLM research and provides transferable insights for extending LLMs to other low-resource languages. We will release the model weights, evaluation benchmarks, and detailed data processing documentation in the follow-up.

Abstract:
Neutralizing hyperpartisan content is essential for mitigating online polarization, yet research has largely focused on English. We present Par-ITA, a curated subset from Semeval 2023 task 3, consisting in the first human-supervised parallel corpus for Italian hyperpartisan neutralization of 2,475 paragraph pairs. The dataset is constructed using a rigorous three-stage pipeline: (1) expert-led preliminary selection of LLMs for high-quality generation, (2) human-supervised data production with high editing rates (32–68%), and (3) post-hoc human validation. We establish extensive benchmarks for this task across seq2seq and decoder-only architectures, evaluating standard fine-tuning, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and in-context learning. Our analysis highlights that while DPO effectively maximizes neutrality scores in seq2seq models, automated evaluators like GPT-4o-mini exhibit systematic biases, specifically over-penalizing sensitive political topics compared to human experts. Par-ITA provides a foundational resource for non-English neutralization and a reproducible framework for developing high-quality datasets in subjective domains.

Abstract:
Emotional coordination is a core property of human interaction that shapes how relational meaning is constructed in real time. While text-based affect inference has become increasingly feasible, prior approaches often treat sentiment as a deterministic point estimate for individual speakers, failing to capture the inherent subjectivity, latent ambiguity, and sequential coupling found in mutual exchanges. We introduce LLM-MC-Affect, a probabilistic framework that characterizes emotion not as a static label, but as a continuous latent probability distribution defined over an affective space. By leveraging stochastic LLM decoding and Monte Carlo estimation, the methodology approximates these distributions to derive high-fidelity sentiment trajectories that explicitly quantify both central affective tendencies and perceptual ambiguity. These trajectories enable a structured analysis of interpersonal coupling through sequential cross-correlation and slope-based indicators, identifying leading or lagging influences between interlocutors. To validate the interpretive capacity of this approach, we utilize teacher-student instructional dialogues as a representative case study, where our quantitative indicators successfully distill high-level interaction insights such as effective scaffolding. This work establishes a scalable and deployable pathway for understanding interpersonal dynamics, offering a generalizable solution that extends beyond education to broader social and behavioral research.

Abstract:
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) aims to infer human sentiment from textual, acoustic, and visual signals. In real-world scenarios, however, multimodal inputs are often compromised by dynamic noise or modality missingness. Existing methods typically treat these imperfections as discrete cases or assume fixed corruption ratios, which limits their adaptability to continuously varying reliability conditions. To address this, we first introduce a Continuous Reliability Spectrum to unify missingness and quality degradation into a single framework. Building on this, we propose QA-MoE, a Quality-Aware Mixture-of-Experts framework that quantifies modality reliability via self-supervised aleatoric uncertainty. This mechanism explicitly guides expert routing, enabling the model to suppress error propagation from unreliable signals while preserving task-relevant information. Extensive experiments indicate that QA-MoE achieves competitive or state-of-the-art performance across diverse degradation scenarios and exhibits a promising One-Checkpoint-for-All property in practice.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various general domains, they exhibit notable gaps in the highly specialized, knowledge-intensive, and legally regulated Chinese tax domain. Consequently, while tax-related benchmarks are gaining attention, many focus on isolated NLP tasks, neglecting real-world practical capabilities. To address this issue, we introduce TaxPraBen, the first dedicated benchmark for Chinese taxation practice. It combines 10 traditional application tasks, along with 3 pioneering real-world scenarios: tax risk prevention, tax inspection analysis, and tax strategy planning, sourced from 14 datasets totaling 7.3K instances. TaxPraBen features a scalable structured evaluation paradigm designed through process of "structured parsing—field alignment extraction—numerical and textual matching", enabling end-to-end tax practice assessment while being extensible to other domains. We evaluate 19 LLMs based on Bloom’s taxonomy. The results indicate significant performance disparities: all closed-source large-parameter LLMs excel, and Chinese LLMs like Qwen2.5 generally exceed multilingual LLMs, while the YaYi2 LLM, fine-tuned with some tax data, shows only limited improvement. TaxPraBen[] serves as a vital resource for advancing evaluations of LLMs in practical applications.

Abstract:
Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods, including prompt engineering and model optimization, either hardly alter models’ internal knowledge or have poor cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding mitigates hallucinations by using layer-wise differences in LLMs. However, prior studies only explore transformer-based models (e.g., GPT), ignoring other effective frameworks like mixture-of-experts (MoE) models. Since MoE alters the traditional transformer architecture, we conduct empirical studies to investigate whether similar layer-wise differences exist in MoEs. Our results show that they do not exist in MoE with shared experts; nevertheless, across different MoEs, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. Building on these, we propose EAACD, an expert-aware adaptive contrast decoding that uses expert differences in MoE’s higher layers to mitigate hallucinations on QA tasks. EAACD splits high-layer experts into a higher-reliability group and several lower-reliability groups based on their confidence and consistency. It contrasts the higher-reliability group’s prediction with each lower-reliability group’s prediction to calibrate the model’s original predictions. To strengthen this contrast, EAACD amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts via attention and masking to provide stronger negative references. EAACD outperforms all baselines on four datasets

Abstract:
Can Large Language models (LLMs) accurately simulate the next web action of a specific user? While LLMs have shown promising capabilities in generating believable human behaviors, evaluating their ability to mimic real user behaviors remains an open challenge, largely due to the lack of high-quality, publicly available datasets that capture both the observable actions and the internal reasoning of an actual human user. To address this gap, we introduce OPeRA, a novel dataset of Observation, Persona, Rationale, and Action collected from real human participants during online shopping sessions. OPeRA is the first public dataset that comprehensively captures: user personas, browser observations, fine-grained web actions, and self-reported just-in-time rationales. We developed both an online questionnaire and a custom browser plugin to gather this dataset with high fidelity. Using OPeRA, we establish the first benchmark to evaluate how well current LLMs can predict a specific user’s next action and rationale with a given persona and history. This dataset lays the groundwork for future research into LLM agents that aim to act as personalized digital twins for human.

Abstract:
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific workflows presents exciting opportunities to accelerate biomedical discovery. However, the reactive nature of LLMs, which respond only when prompted, limits their effectiveness in collaborative settings that demand foresight and autonomous engagement. In this study, we introduce CoLabScience, a proactive LLM assistant designed to enhance biomedical collaboration between AI systems and human experts through timely, context-aware interventions. At the core of our method is PULI (Positive-Unlabeled Learning-to-Intervene), a novel framework trained with a reinforcement learning objective to determine when and how to intervene in streaming scientific discussions, by leveraging the team’s project proposal and long- and short-term conversational memory. To support this work, we introduce BSDD (Biomedical Streaming Dialogue Dataset), a new benchmark of simulated research discussion dialogues with intervention points derived from PubMed articles. Experimental results show that PULI significantly outperforms existing baselines in both intervention precision and collaborative task utility, highlighting the potential of proactive LLMs as intelligent scientific assistants.

Abstract:
Hallucinations pose a critical challenge to the real-world deployment of large language models (LLMs) in high-stakes domains. In this paper, we present a framework for stress testing factual fidelity in LLMs in the presence of adversarial nudge. Our framework consists of three steps. First, we instruct the LLM to produce sets of truths and lies consistent with the closed domain in question. Next, we instruct the LLM to verify the same set of assertions as truths and lies consistent with the same closed domain. Finally, we test the robustness of the LLM against the lies generated (and verified) by itself. Our extensive evaluation, conducted using five widely known proprietary and six open LLMs across two closed domains of popular movies and novels, reveals a wide range of susceptibility to adversarial nudges: even among the strongest proprietary LLMs, Claude exhibits strong resilience, GPT and Grok demonstrate moderate resilience, while Gemini and DeepSeek show weak resilience and open models fall short significantly.

Abstract:
We introduce the Similarity-Distance-Magnitude (SDM) activation function, a more robust and interpretable formulation of the standard softmax activation function, adding Similarity (i.e., correctly predicted depth-matches into training) awareness and Distance-to-training-distribution awareness to the existing output Magnitude (i.e., decision-boundary) awareness, and enabling interpretability-by-exemplar via dense matching. We further introduce the SDM estimator, based on a data-driven partitioning of the class-wise empirical CDFs via the SDM activation, to control the class- and prediction-conditional accuracy among selective classifications. When used as the final-layer activation over pre-trained language models for selective classification, the SDM estimator is more robust to covariate shifts and out-of-distribution inputs than existing calibration methods using softmax activations, while remaining informative over in-distribution data.

Abstract:
Although language model–based chat systems are increasingly used in daily life, most Americans remain non-adopters of chat-based LLMs — as of June 2025, 66% had never used ChatGPT. At the same time, LLM development and evaluation rely mainly on data from adopters (e.g., logs, preference data), focusing on the needs and tasks for a limited demographic group of adopters in terms of geographic location, education, and gender. In this position paper, we argue that incorporating non-adopter perspectives is essential for developing broadly useful and capable LLMs. We contend that relying on methods that focus primarily on adopters will risk missing a range of tasks and needs prioritized by non-adopters, entrenching inequalities in who benefits from LLMs, and creating oversights in model development and evaluation. To illustrate this claim, we conduct case studies with non-adopters and show: how non-adopter needs diverge from those of current users, how non-adopter needs point us towards novel reasoning tasks, and how to systematically integrate non-adopter needs via human-centered methods.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) remains fundamentally limited by poor data efficiency and weak generalization. Prior episodic RL methods attempt to alleviate this via external memory modules, yet they suffer from two key limitations: a representation bottleneck caused by shallow encoders, and a retrieval dilemma where episodic memory is accessed indiscriminately.To address these challenges, we propose Agentic Episodic Control (AEC), a novel architecture that integrates large language models (LLMs) into episodic RL.AEC uses an LLM-based semantic augmenter to generate semantic representations from raw observations, and a critical state recognizer to selectively retrieve valuable experiences.This transforms memory usage from passive similarity matching into strategic, context-aware recall.Across five BabyAI-Text environments, AEC achieves 2–6× higher data efficiency than baselines and is the only method to solve complex tasks like UnlockLocal with over 90% success.It further demonstrates strong cross-task and cross-environment generalization, maintaining performance even under distribution shifts.AEC shows that combining LLM-derived priors with reinforcement learning yields more sample-efficient and adaptable agents. Code is available at https://github.com/Xidong-Yang/Agentic_Episodic_Control.

Abstract:
Standard in-context learning (ICL) assumes identical output spaces between test and retrieval datasets (fully aligned). However, in practice, these datasets can be fully aligned, partially aligned, or fully disjoint in label space (Output space), forming an information continuum from rich to scarce. Naive ICL often becomes ineffective under such mismatches. In this work, we challenge this assumption by demonstrating that the retrieval dataset need not perfectly align with the test dataset, as long as it remains related to the target task. We propose Task-Related In-Context Learning (TRICL), a unified framework for ICL under output-space mismatch, designed to cover the full continuum of scenarios. TRICL first identifies demonstrations in the mismatched retrieval dataset that are relevant to the test label space via a lightweight Bayesian probabilistic criterion, and uses them to form a related dataset. TRICL then perform ICL on the related dataset to obtain preliminary predictions; finally, TRICL leverage these intermediate predictions to reduce and transform the output space of the original test task, thereby improving the performance of LLMs. Even in the most information-scarce fully disjoint scenario, as long as the retrieval dataset is task-related to the test task, TRICL achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results across three LLMs, three task types, and four datasets. Moreover, TRICL remains effective in the fully aligned and partially aligned scenarios, consistently yielding strong gains over competitive baselines. Moreover, TRICL also extends to generative task.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often memorize sensitive or harmful information, necessitating effective machine unlearning techniques. While existing parameter-efficient unlearning methods have shown promise, they still struggle with the forget-retain trade-off. This can be attributed to their reliance on parameter importance metrics to identify parameters that are important exclusively for forget set, which is fundamentally limited by the superposition phenomenon. Due to the polysemantic nature of LLMs parameters, such an importance metric may struggle to disentangle parameters associated with forget and retain sets. In this work, we propose Representation-Guided Low-rank Unlearning (ReGLU), a novel approach that leverages the geometric properties of representation spaces to achieve robust and precise unlearning. First, we develop a representation-guided initialization for LoRA that identifies the optimal subspace for selective forgetting. Second, we introduce a regularization loss that constrains the outputs of the LoRA update to lie in the orthogonal complement of the retain set’s representation subspace, thereby minimizing interference with the model’s performance on the retain set. We evaluate ReGLU on the TOFU and WMDP benchmarks across multiple models. Our results demonstrate that ReGLU consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving superior unlearning quality while maintaining higher model utility.

Abstract:
We introduce two reference-free metrics for quality evaluation of taxonomies in the absence of labels. The first metric evaluates robustness by calculating the correlation between semantic and taxonomic similarity, addressing error types not considered by existing metrics. The second uses Natural Language Inference to assess logical adequacy. Both metrics are tested on five taxonomies and are shown to correlate well with F1 against ground truth taxonomies. We further demonstrate that our metrics can predict downstream performance in hierarchical classification when used with label hierarchies.

Abstract:
A large language model’s (LLM’s) out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation is crucial to its deployment. Previous work assessing LLMs’ generalisation performance, however, typically focuses on a single out-of-distribution dataset. This approach may fail to precisely evaluate the capabilities of the model, as the data shifts encountered during deployment are much more diverse. In this work, we investigate whether OOD generalisation results generalise. More specifically, we evaluate a model’s performance across multiple OOD testsets throughout a finetuning run; we then evaluate the partial correlation of performances across these testsets, regressing out in-domain performance. This allows us to assess how correlated are generalisation performances once in-domain performance is controlled for. Analysing OLMo, OPT and SmolLM, we observe no overarching trend in generalisation results: the existence of a positive or negative correlation between any two OOD testsets depends strongly on the specific choice of model analysed.

Abstract:
In the quest for scientific progress, communicating research is as vital as the discovery itself. Yet, researchers are often sidetracked by the manual, repetitive chore of building project webpages to make their dense papers accessible. While automation has tackled static slides and posters, the dynamic, interactive nature of webpages has remained an unaddressed challenge. To bridge this gap, we reframe the problem, arguing that the solution lies not in a single command, but in a collaborative, hierarchical process. We introduce AutoPage , a novel multi-agent system that embodies this philosophy. AutoPage deconstructs paper-to-page creation into a coarse-to-fine pipeline from narrative planning to multimodal content generation and interactive rendering. To combat AI hallucination, dedicated "Checker" agents verify each step against the source paper, while optional human checkpoints ensure the final product aligns perfectly with the author’s vision, transforming the system from a mere tool into a powerful collaborative assistant. To rigorously validate our approach, we also construct PageBench , the first benchmark for this new task. Experiments show AutoPage not only generates high-quality, visually appealing pages but does so with remarkable efficiency in under 15 minutes for less than 0.1. Code and data will be released.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly seen as assistants, copilots, and consultants, capable of supporting a wide range of tasks through natural conversation. However, most systems remain constrained by a linear request-response format that often makes interactions inefficient in multi-turn, information-dense, and exploratory tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Generative Interfaces for Language Models, a paradigm in which LLMs respond to user queries by proactively generating user interfaces (UIs) that enable more adaptive and interactive engagement. Our framework leverages structured interface-specific representations and iterative refinements to translate user queries into task-specific UIs. For systematic evaluation, we introduce a multidimensional assessment framework that compares generative interfaces with traditional chat-based ones across diverse tasks, interaction patterns, and query types, capturing functional, interactive, and emotional aspects of user experience. Results show that generative interfaces consistently outperform conversational ones, with up to a 72% improvement in human preference. These findings clarify when and why users favor generative interfaces, paving the way for future advancements in human-AI interaction. Data and code are available at https://github.com/SALT-NLP/GenUI.

Abstract:
The Retentive Network (RetNet) has recently emerged as a formidable successor to the Transformer architecture. Although the self-attention mechanism excels at capturing global dependencies, its inherent quadratic complexity imposes significant memory constraints and inhibits scalability during long-sequence modeling. To overcome these challenges, RetNet introduces an innovative retention mechanism that integrates the inductive bias of recurrent neural networks with the parallelizable training advantages of attention-based models. This unified representation allows RetNet to achieve constant-time inference and linear-time training without sacrificing representational capacity. Despite the growing body of research demonstrating the efficacy of RetNet across diverse fields such as natural language processing, computer vision, and time-series analysis, a systematic synthesis of the current literature is currently unavailable. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of Retentive Networks through a detailed examination of its architectural foundations, core innovations, and specialized variants. Furthermore, we provide a multi-disciplinary analysis of its applications ranging from basic sequence tasks to complex cross-modal scenarios. Finally, we offer prospective insights and suggest strategic avenues for future inquiry to facilitate the continued evolution of RetNet in both academic research and large-scale industrial applications.

Abstract:
Existing multi-agent learning approaches explicitly foster collaboration among Large Language Models (LLMs) to build stronger multi-agent systems (MAS), yet they still rely on re-executing the MAS during inference. This contrasts with human cognition, wherein individuals can internalize insights from interactions to improve later independent reasoning. To investigate whether multi-agent interaction can enhance LLMs’ independent problem-solving ability, we propose ILR (Interactive Learning for LLM Reasoning), a co-learning framework that integrates Dynamic Interaction and Perception Calibration. Dynamic Interaction adaptively selects cooperative or competitive strategies based on question difficulty and model capability, after which LLMs exchange information via Idea3 framework (Idea Sharing, Idea Analysis, and Idea Fusion), an interaction paradigm simulating human discussion, before producing final answers. Perception Calibration employs Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) while integrating one LLM’s reward characteristics into another’s to strengthen interaction cohesion. We evaluate the effectiveness of ILR across three LLMs from two model families of varying scales on five mathematical and one coding benchmarks. We further investigate the advantage of Dynamic Interaction (i.e., boosting the robustness of stronger LLMs and surpassing pure strategy), and the scalability of ILR beyond two-model interactions.

Abstract:
A line of work in planning uses LLM not to generate a plan, but to generate a formal representation in some planning language, which can be input into a symbolic solver to deterministically find a plan. While showing improved trust and promising performance, dozens of recent publications have proposed scattered methods on a variety of benchmarks under different experimental settings. We attempt to unify the inference-time LLM-as-formalizer methodology for classical planning by proposing a unifying organizational framework based on intermediate representations. We thus systematically evaluate more than a dozen pipelines that subsume most existing work, while proposing novel ones that involve syntactically similar but high-resource intermediate languages (such as a Python wrapper of PDDL). We provide recipes for planning language generation pipelines, draw a series of conclusions showing the efficacy of their various components, and evidence their robustness against problem complexity.

Abstract:
Modern large language models (LLMs) are typically trained and deployed using structured role tags (e.g. system, user, assistant, tool) that explicitly mark the source of each piece of context. While these tags are essential for instruction following and controllability, asymmetries in the training data associated with different role tags can potentially introduce inductive biases. In this paper, we study this phenomenon by formalizing user–assistant bias, defined as the tendency of an LLM to preferentially rely on information from either the user or assistant role when they provide incompatible information about the same entity in the context history. We introduce a task-agnostic benchmark UserAssist and evaluate such bias in 52 frontier models. We observe that most of the instruction-tuned models exhibit strong user bias, whereas base and reasoning models are close to neutral. Using controlled fine-tuning experiments, we isolate which post-training recipes drive the observed user–assistant bias. We find that human-preference alignment amplifies user bias, while reasoning fine-tuning reduces it. Finally, we show that user–assistant bias can be bidirectionally controlled via direct preference optimization (DPO) on UserAssist-train, and that the resulting bias reliably generalizes to two realistic multi-turn debate datasets spanning philosophical opinions and natural argumentative exchanges on factual/policy topics. These results reveal an underexplored consequence of role-tagged training and provide a principled framework to diagnose and control tag-induced biases in modern LLMs.

Abstract:
Current evaluations of agents remain centered around one-shot task completion, failing to account for the inherently iterative and collaborative nature of many real-world problems, where human goals are often underspecified and evolve. We argue for a shift from building and assessing task completion agents to developing collaborative agents, assessed not only by the quality of their final outputs but by how well they engage with and enhance human effort throughout the problem-solving process. To support this shift, we introduce collaborative effort scaling, a framework that captures how an agent’s utility grows with increasing user involvement. Through case studies and simulated evaluations, we show that state-of-the-art agents often underperform in multi-turn, real-world scenarios, revealing a missing ingredient in agent design: the ability to sustain engagement and scaffold user understanding. Collaborative effort scaling offers a lens for diagnosing agent behavior and guiding development toward more effective interactions.

Abstract:
Mid-training has become critical for enhancing the knowledge and reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), especially through the utilization of large-scale synthetic data. However, existing data synthesis methods often generate simplistic and homogeneous QA pairs, with limited scale and diversity. To address this, we propose BoostQA, a novel framework designed to synthesize large-scale, diverse, and high-quality QA data for mid-training. BoostQA introduces model probes during mid-training for the first time and implements STEM-focused multi-grade synthesis to boost data diversity as well as high-difficulty synthesis to alleviate difficulty degradation, followed by answer refinement to further improve quality. Extensive experiments by mid-training Llama-3 8B demonstrate that using only 20B-token BoostQA data achieves a significant average improvement of 12.74% on MMLU and CMMLU over the pre-training baseline. After mid-training on 500B tokens, including 100B-token BoostQA data, our model achieves SOTA average results across benchmarks among mainstream models of comparable size. BoostQA also demonstrates robust scalability, with performance consistently improving as model size, data volume, and initial FLOPs scale.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) based agents excel at diverse tasks, yet they suffer from brittle procedural memory that is manually engineered or entangled in static parameters. In this work, we investigate strategies to endow agents with a learnable, updatable, and lifelong procedural memory. We propose a procedural-memory repository that distills past agent trajectories into both fine-grained, step-by-step instructions and higher-level, script-like abstractions. Coupled with a dynamic regimen that continuously updates, corrects, and deprecates its contents, this repository evolves in lockstep with new experience. Empirical evaluation on TravelPlanner and Alfworld shows that as the memory repository is refined, agents achieve steadily higher success rates and greater efficiency on analogous tasks. Moreover, procedural memory built from a stronger model retains its value: migrating the procedural memory to a weaker model yields substantial performance gains.

Abstract:
Recent work has aimed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of language models, but these methods are often limited to domains with objectively verifiable answers. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Reasoning-Guided Exploration for Online DPO (RGE-DPO), a novel self-play framework designed to improve reasoning on general-domain data. RGE-DPO employs a dual-reward mechanism to evaluate responses by assessing: (1) reasoning quality using a self-rewarding rubric that provides structured evaluation of logical coherence, reasoning depth, and verification behaviors; and (2) response quality using an established reward model trained for aspects like helpfulness and correctness. These two orthogonal evaluation signals enable a comprehensive assessment of different response dimensions without conflating reasoning processes with response content. We then integrate these two evaluation signals based on a weighted ranking mechanism to construct the preference pairs, which ensures that responses with superior reasoning processes are preferred when response quality is comparable. Experiments demonstrate that RGE-DPO achieves substantial improvements in instruction-following benchmark while maintaining competitive performance on verifiable academic benchmarks.

Abstract:
Finite-State Transducers (FSTs) are effective models for string-to-string rewriting tasks, often providing the efficiency necessary for high-performance applications, but constructing transducers by hand is difficult. In this work, we propose a novel method for automatically constructing unweighted FSTs following the hidden state geometry learned by a recurrent neural network. We evaluate our methods on real-world datasets for morphological inflection, grapheme-to-phoneme prediction, and historical normalization, showing that the constructed FSTs are highly accurate and robust for many datasets, massively outperforming classical transducer learning algorithms by up to 87% accuracy on held-out test sets.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are typically evaluated under static assumptions, despite being frequently corrected through user or expert feedback in deployment. Existing evaluation protocols focus on overall accuracy and fail to capture how systems adapt after feedback is introduced. We introduce feedback adaptation as a problem setting for RAG systems, which asks how effectively and how quickly corrective feedback propagates to future queries. To make this behavior measurable, we propose two evaluation axes: correction lag, which captures the delay between feedback provision and behavioral change, and post-feedback performance, which measures reliability on semantically related queries after feedback. Using these metrics, we show that training-based approaches exhibit a trade-off between delayed correction and reliable adaptation. We further propose PatchRAG, a minimal inference-time instantiation that incorporates feedback without retraining, demonstrating immediate correction and strong post-feedback generalization under the proposed evaluation. Our results highlight feedback adaptation as a previously overlooked dimension of RAG system behavior in interactive settings.

Abstract:
Professionals in academia, law, and finance audit their documents because inconsistencies can result in monetary, reputational, and scientific costs. Language models (LMs) have the potential to dramatically speed up this auditing process. To understand their abilities, we introduce a benchmark, FIND (Finding INconsistencies in Documents), where each example is a document with an inconsistency inserted manually by a domain expert. Despite the documents being long, technical, and complex, the best-performing model (‘gpt-5‘) recovered 64% of the inserted inconsistencies. Surprisingly, ‘gpt-5‘ also found inconsistencies already present in the original documents. For example, on 50 arXiv papers, we judged 136 out of 196 of the model’s suggestions to be legitimate inconsistencies missed by the original authors. However, despite these findings, even the best models miss almost half of the inconsistencies in FIND, demonstrating that inconsistency detection is still a challenging task.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), yet still rely heavily on external supervision (e.g., curated labels). Adversarial learning, particularly through self-play, offers a promising alternative that enables models to learn from themselves—thus reducing reliance on external supervision. Dual-play extends adversarial learning by assigning specialized roles to two models and training them against each other, fostering sustained competition and mutual evolution. Despite its promise, adapting dual-play training to LLMs remains limited. In this paper, we introduce PasoDoble, a novel LLM dual-play framework. PasoDoble adversarially trains two models initialized from the same base model: a Proposer, which generates challenging questions with ground-truth answers, and a Solver, which attempts to solve them. We enrich the Proposer with knowledge from a pre-training dataset to ensure the questions’ quality and diversity. To avoid reward hacking, the Proposer is rewarded for producing only valid questions that push the Solver’s limit, while the Solver is rewarded for solving them correctly, and both are updated jointly. Experimental results show that PasoDoble can improve the math reasoning performance of LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance on multi-step reasoning tasks by producing intermediate explanations, commonly referred to as chains of thought (CoTs). However, the generated rationales are typically verbose, consuming many additional tokens, and thus degrading throughput and increasing inference energy consumption. Interestingly, we find that verbose and concise CoTs correspond to distinct regions in the model’s intermediate activation space, suggesting that verbosity is a steerable latent attribute. Building on this observation, we develop an inference-time method to automatically steer the model response towards concise reasoning traces without updating model parameters. Our method, dubbed _ASC_ (Activation-Steered Compression), generates concise CoTs by directly adjusting internal representations via activation steering. A key component of ASC is Contrastive Energy-Based Steering (CES), a principled procedure to learn a _single_ steering vector from a small set of verbose–concise CoT pairs by optimizing a length-normalized contrastive energy objective. To further ensure reliable steering and preserve general utility, CES enforces a differentiable KL trust region during steering vector optimization, explicitly constraining the distribution shift within a specified budget. With only 100 pairs of verbose–concise examples, ASC reduces the generated token length by as much as 69.4% across five reasoning benchmarks (MATH500, GSM8K, LiveCodeBench, GSM8K-Hard, and AQuA-RAT) while maintaining accuracy across models with 1.5B, 7B, 8B, and 32B parameters. On MATH500, ASC achieves an end-to-end inference speed-up of 2.7× on an 8B model.

Abstract:
While it is widely agreed that large language models (LLMs) store concepts from multiple semantic hierarchies, much remains unknown regarding the structure of this storage. The correspondence between the functional roles of LLM components and the semantic hierarchies of knowledge remains underexplored in the current literature. For example, is information organized hierarchically within sections of an LLM? We take an initial step towards causally examining the correspondence between hierarchical concepts and the multi-granular structures (layers and attention heads) of various models. Specifically, we generate a dataset of semantic hierarchies and investigate their storage locations in six LLMs using activation patching, a causal intervention technique. At the layer level, our findings show a moderate indication that concepts at finer levels of granularity are stored around 61-78% of the time ( p < 0.01) before those at coarser granularity. There is evidence for this trend at the attention level; however, the high variability in attention level results suggests that concepts are stored across attention heads rather than within. Our results offer insight into semantic organization within LLMs.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used to generate plausible text on online platforms, without revealing the generation process.As users increasingly encounter such black-box outputs, detecting hallucinations has become a critical challenge.To address this challenge, we focus on developing a hallucination detection framework for black-box generators.Motivated by the observation that hallucinations, once introduced, tend to persist, we sample future contexts.The sampled future contexts provide valuable clues for hallucination detection and can be effectively integrated with various sampling-based methods.We extensively demonstrate performance improvements across multiple methods using our proposed sampling approach.

Abstract:
Agentic Reinforcement Learning (Agentic RL) has achieved notable success in enabling agents to perform complex reasoning and tool use. However, most methods still relies on sparse outcome-based reward for training. Such feedback fails to differentiate intermediate reasoning quality, leading to suboptimal training results. In this paper, we introduce Agent Reasoning Reward Model (Agent-RRM) , a multi-faceted reward model that produces structured feedback for agentic trajectories, including (1) an explicit reasoning trace , (2) a focused critique that provides refinement guidance by highlighting reasoning flaws, and (3) an overall score that evaluates process performance. Leveraging these signals, we systematically investigate three integration strategies: Reagent-C (text-augmented refinement), Reagent-R (reward-augmented guidance), and Reagent-U (unified feedback integration). Extensive evaluations across 12 diverse benchmarks demonstrate that Reagent-U yields substantial performance leaps, achieving 43.7% on GAIA and 46.2% on WebWalkerQA, validating the effectiveness of our reasoning reward model and training schemes. Code, models, and datasets will be released to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Earth Observation (EO) provides critical planetary data for environmental monitoring, disaster management, climate science, and other scientific domains. In this work we ask: Are AI systems ready for reliable Earth Observation? To answer this, we introduce UnivEARTH, a coding benchmark of 408 yes/no questions from NASA Earth Observatory articles across 7 various topics and over 15 satellite instruments and sources. Using Google Earth Engine API as a tool in a zero-shot setup, LLM agents achieve an accuracy of 40.0% where the code fails to run over 44% of the time. To better understand LLM agent behavior, we also analyze the impact of using the JavaScript API versus Python and the effect of providing documentation. Furthermore, we find that using a reflexion framework significantly reduces errors: Claude-4.5-Sonnet, Gemini-2.5-Pro, and GPT-5 accuracies rise to around 60%. However, these results remain only marginally above random chance. Taken together, our findings identify significant challenges to be solved before AI agents can automate earth observation, and suggest paths forward.

Abstract:
With the widespread deployment of large language models (LLMs), existing safety benchmarks remain largely focused on explicitly harmful content, overlooking context-dependent expressions such as dogwhistles, the language that conveys harmful intent while appearing benign on the surface. To address this gap, we introduce DogBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM safety under dogwhistle-driven prompts. DogBench comprises 11,150 prompt instances constructed from controlled templates that embed dogwhistle terms, allowing for enabling direct comparison with explicit toxic terms under identical prompt structures. Each prompt is further annotated with pragmatic attributes, including interaction category and stance tendency. Extensive evaluations across multiple mainstream LLMs reveal a consistent pattern: dogwhistle prompts are substantially more likely to elicit harmful outputs than their explicit toxic counterparts, with an average risk increase of approximately fourfold. These findings expose a blind spot in current safety evaluation and alignment practices. Our work underscores the need to explicitly incorporate dogwhistles into future LLM safety research, with DogBench serving as a dedicated benchmark for this purpose.

Abstract:
Model merging has emerged as an effective approach for integrating multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single unified model without requiring additional data-intensive training. A central challenge in model merging is to reduce task interference while preserving the task-specific capabilities of the original models. In this work, we propose PRIME, an ultra-low-rank principal-residual model merging framework that decomposes task vector merging into two complementary stages. First, ultra-low-rank principal task vector merging retains only a small fraction of singular vectors, effectively reducing task interference while preserving most of the task-specific performance. Second, orthogonal residual task vector merging incorporates the remaining components by projecting them onto the null space of the principal subspace, thereby avoiding interference while recovering additional task-relevant information. Extensive experiments on eight natural language processing tasks demonstrate that PRIME consistently outperforms existing model merging methods, achieving improvements of up to 1.18% on T5 and 1.9% on LLaMA-3.2-3B.

Abstract:
Recent advances in text-to-speech (TTS) have been driven by large, multi-domain speech corpora, yet the expressive potential of audiobook data remains underexamined. We argue that human-narrated audiobooks, particularly fictional works, contain rich and diverse prosodic cues arising from the natural alternation between neutral narration and expressive character dialogue. Building from this observation, we introduce LibriQuote, a large-scale 5.3K hours of expressive speech drawn from character quotations.Each quote is supplemented with contextual pseudo-labels for speech verbs and adverbs that characterize the intended delivery of direct speech (e.g., “ he whispered softly ”).We found that fine-tuning a flow-matching model on LibriQuote yields substantial improvements in expressivity and intelligibility, while training from scratch enhances expressiveness of an autoregressive TTS model.Benchmarking on LibriQuote- test highlights significant variability across systems in generating expressive speech.We publicly release the dataset, code, and evaluation resources to facilitate reproducibility.Audio samples can be found at https://libriquote.github.io/ .

Abstract:
LLM agents are increasingly used for social simulation, yet emotion is often treated as a transient cue, causing emotional amnesia and weak long-horizon continuity. We present Sentipolis, a framework for emotionally stateful agents that integrates continuous Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance (PAD) representation, dual-speed emotion dynamics, and emotion–memory coupling. Across thousands of interactions over multiple base models and evaluators, Sentipolis improves emotionally grounded behavior, boosting communication, and emotional continuity. Gains are model-dependent: believability increases for higher-capacity models but can drop for smaller ones, and emotion-awareness can mildly reduce adherence to social norms, reflecting a human-like tension between emotion-driven behavior and rule compliance in social simulation. Network-level diagnostics show reciprocal, moderately clustered, and temporally stable relationship structures, supporting the study of cumulative social dynamics such as alliance formation and gradual relationship change.

Abstract:
Leveraging multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) has proven effective for addressing complex, high-dimensional tasks, but current approaches often rely on static, manually engineered multi-agent configurations. To overcome these constraints, we present the Agentic Neural Network ( ANN ), a framework that conceptualizes multi-agent collaboration as a layered neural network architecture. In this design, each agent operates as a node, and each layer forms a cooperative team focused on a specific subtask. The proposed framework follows a two-phase optimization strategy: (1) Forward Phase - Drawing inspiration from neural network forward passes, tasks are dynamically decomposed into subtasks, and cooperative agent teams with suitable aggregation methods are constructed layer by layer. (2) Backward Phase - Mirroring backpropagation, we refine both global and local collaboration through iterative feedback, allowing agents to self-evolve their roles, prompts, and coordination. This neuro-symbolic approach enables our framework to create new or specialized agent teams post-training, delivering notable gains in accuracy and adaptability. Across seven benchmark datasets, ANN surpasses leading multi-agent baselines under the same configurations, showing consistent performance improvements.

Abstract:
Large language models can produce fluent judgments for clinical natural language inference, yet they frequently fail when the decision requires the correct inferential schema rather than surface matching. We introduce CARENLI , a compartmentalised agentic framework that routes each premise–statement pair to a reasoning family and then applies a specialised solver with explicit verification and targeted refinement. We evaluate on an expanded CTNLI benchmark of 200 instances spanning four reasoning families: Causal Attribution, Compositional Grounding, Epistemic Verification, and Risk State Abstraction. Across four contemporary backbones models, CARENLI improves mean accuracy from about 23% with direct prompting to about 57%, a gain of roughly 34 points, with the largest benefits on structurally demanding reasoning types. These results support compartmentalisation plus verification as a practical route to more reliable and auditable clinical inference.

Abstract:
Understanding which parts of the retrieved context contribute to a large language model’s generated answer is essential for building interpretable and trustworthy retrieval-augmented generation. We propose a novel framework that formulates context attribution as a combinatorial multi-armed bandit problem. We utilize Linear Thompson Sampling to efficiently identify the most influential context segments while minimizing the number of model queries. Our reward function leverages token log-probabilities to measure how well a subset of segments supports the original response, making it applicable to both open-source and black-box API-based models. Unlike SHAP and other perturbation-based methods that sample subsets uniformly, our approach adaptively prioritizes informative subsets based on posterior estimates of segment relevance, reducing computational costs. Experiments on multiple QA benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves up to 30% reduction in model queries while matching or exceeding the attribution quality of existing approaches.

Abstract:
Deploying large language models in long-horizon, goal-oriented interactions remains challenging because similar entities and facts recur under different latent goals and con-straints, causing memory systems to retrieve context-mismatched evidence. We propose STITCH (Structured Intent Tracking in Contextual History), an agentic memory system that indexes each trajectory step with a structured retrieval cue, contextual intent, and retrieves history by matching the current step’s intent. Contextual intent provides compact signals that disambiguate repeated mentions and reduce interference: (1) the current latent goal defining a thematic segment, (2) the action type, and (3) the salient entity types anchoring which attributes matter. During inference, STITCH filters and prioritizes memory snippets by intent compatibility, suppressing semantically similar but context-incompatible history.For evaluation, we introduce CAME-Bench, a benchmark for context-aware retrieval in realistic, dynamic, goal-oriented trajectories. Across CAME-Bench and LongMemEval, STITCH achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming the strongest baseline by 35.6%, with the largest gains as trajectory length increases. Our analysis shows that intent indexing substantially reduces retrieval noise, supporting intent-aware memory for robust long-horizon reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) incur quadratic attention complexity with input length, creating a major time bottleneck in the prefilling stage. Existing acceleration methods largely exploit attention score sparsity by estimating blocks with high attention scores and applying dynamic sparse attention. In this work, we identify another untapped form of sparsity in the prefilling stage, namely decoding-time contribution sparsity, where many attention blocks exhibit nontrivial attention scores during prefilling yet contribute negligibly to subsequent decoding. Building on this observation, we propose TriangleMix, which replaces dense attention with Triangle attention in a subset of layers. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TriangleMix achieves near-lossless performance on both long-context and long-context reasoning benchmarks, while significantly improving efficiency. For 128K inputs, Triangle attention in the subset of layers achieves a 15.3 × speedup in attention kernel computation, significantly exceeding the acceleration of typical dynamic sparse methods ( 1.9 × to 3.4 × ). Furthermore, TriangleMix can be seamlessly combined with dynamic sparsity approaches, delivering an additional 6%–19% reduction in TTFT over using dynamic sparsity alone.

Abstract:
Large Language Model agents deployed in complex environments frequently encounter a conflict between maximizing goal achievement and adhering to safety constraints. This paper identifies a new concept called Agentic Pressure, which characterizes the endogenous tension emerging when compliant execution becomes infeasible. We demonstrate that under this pressure agents exhibit normative drift where they strategically sacrifice safety to preserve utility. Notably we find that advanced reasoning capabilities accelerate this decline as models construct linguistic rationalizations to justify violation. Finally, we analyze the root causes and explore preliminary mitigation strategies, such as pressure isolation, which attempts to restore alignment by decoupling decision-making from pressure signals.

Abstract:
Reasoning has substantially improved Large Language Models (LLMs) on analytical tasks such as mathematics and code generation, but its value for abstractive summarization remains unclear. To address this gap, we adapt general reasoning strategies to the summarization setting and conduct a large-scale comparative study of 8 reasoning strategies and 3 Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) across 8 diverse datasets, evaluating both summary quality and factual faithfulness. Our results show that reasoning is not a universal solution and its effectiveness depends strongly on the strategy and the summarization setting. In particular, we find a trade-off between summary quality and factual faithfulness. Explicit reasoning strategies often improve reference-based quality, but may weaken factual grounding, whereas implicit reasoning in LRMs shows the opposite tendency. We further find that increasing an LRM’s internal reasoning budget does not reliably improve summarization and can even reduce factual consistency. These findings suggest that, for summarization, more reasoning is not always better. Effective reasoning should preserve faithful compression rather than induce over-elaboration.

Abstract:
Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to model student’s knowledge state and predict future performance to enable personalized learning in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. However, traditional KT methods face fundamental limitations in explainability, as they rely solely on the response correctness, neglecting the rich information embedded in students’ problem-solving processes. To address this gap, we propose Knowledge Tracing Leveraging Problem-Solving Process (KT-PSP), which incorporates students’ problem-solving processes to capture the multidimensional aspects of mathematical proficiency. We also introduce KT-PSP-25, a new dataset specifically designed for KT-PSP. Building on this, we present StatusKT, a KT framework that employs a teacher-student-teacher three-stage LLM pipeline to extract students’ Mathematical Proficiency (MP) as intermediate representation. In this pipeline, the teacher LLM first extracts problem-specific proficiency indicators, then a student LLM generates responses based on the student’s solution process, and a teacher LLM evaluates these responses to determine mastery of each indicator. The experimental results on KT-PSP-25 demonstrate that StatusKT improves the prediction performance of existing KT methods. Moreover, StatusKT provides interpretable explanations for its predictions by explicitly modeling students’ mathematical proficiency. Code is available here.

Abstract:
Prompt injection attacks are recognized as one of the primary risks faced by LLM-integrated applications in recent years. However, common evaluation frameworks remain insufficient, lacking comprehensiveness and real-world relevance. To bridge this gap, we revisit the common evaluation framework and conduct an extensive evaluation across eight different evaluation settings, including 37 real-world applications, 185 injected tasks, 21 attack instructions, and a total of 143,745 queries. The evaluation highlights several findings. For example, real-world applications are more vulnerable to prompt injection attacks compared to those used in research settings. While complex attack instructions are more sophisticated, they are less effective than simple attack instructions. We further conduct an assessment of both prompt-level and model-level defense mechanisms and highlight their limitations in real-world applications. By exploring more diverse scenarios across different dimensions, our framework provides a solid foundation for assessing vulnerabilities in LLM-integrated applications and evaluating the efficacy of defensive strategies.

Abstract:
Training data influence estimation methods quantify the contribution of training documents to a model’s output, making them a promising source of information for example-based explanations.As humans cannot interpret thousands of documents, only a small subset of the training data can be presented as an explanation.Although the choice of which documents to include directly affects explanation quality, previous evaluations of such systems have largely ignored any selection strategies.To address this, we propose a novel selection relevance score, a retraining-free metric that quantifies how useful a set of examples is for explaining a model’s output.We validate this score through fine-tuning experiments, confirming that it can predict whether a set of examples supports or undermines the model’s predictions.Using this metric, we further show that common selection strategies often underperform random selection. Motivated by this finding, we propose a strategy that balances influence and representativeness, enabling better use of selection budgets than naively selecting the highest-ranking examples.

Abstract:
The indistinguishability of large language model (LLM) output from human-authored content poses significant challenges, raising concerns about potential misuse of AI-generated text and its influence on future model training. Watermarking algorithms offer a viable solution by embedding detectable signatures into generated text. However, existing watermarking methods often involve trade-offs among attack robustness, generation quality, and additional overhead such as specialized frameworks or complex integrations. We propose a lightweight, topic-guided watermarking scheme for LLMs that partitions the vocabulary into topic-aligned token subsets. Given an input prompt, the scheme selects a relevant topic-specific token list, effectively "green-listing" semantically aligned tokens to embed robust marks while preserving fluency and coherence. Experimental results across multiple LLMs and state-of-the-art benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves text quality comparable to industry-leading systems and simultaneously improves watermark robustness against paraphrasing and lexical perturbation attacks, with minimal performance overhead. Our approach avoids reliance on additional mechanisms beyond standard text generation pipelines, enabling straightforward adoption and suggesting a practical path toward globally consistent watermarking of AI-generated content.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often prioritize linguistic fluency over visual fidelity, leading to hallucinations where generated text contradicts the image. Countering this bias typically requires resource-heavy fine-tuning or high-latency verification methods that provide feedback only after the full response is generated. To overcome these limitations, we present a framework for Token-level Inference-Time Alignment (TITA) that steers the decoding process without updating the base model parameters. By training a lightweight reward model to capture visual preferences, TITA extracts implicit guidance through log-probability ratios. This approach functions as an inference-time adaptation of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), injecting dense feedback to correct the output distribution at every generation step. Across diverse architectures including LLaVA-1.5, Qwen3-VL, and InternVL3.5, TITA consistently improves performance on 13 benchmarks. For example, TITA boosts LLaVA-1.5-7B by 8.6% on MMVet and achieves a 74.0 MMStar score with Qwen3-VL-8B. Specifically, these gains incur negligible overhead (~0.2s per query), offering a superior trade-off between alignment effectiveness and efficiency. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Thecommonirin/TITA.

Abstract:
Conversational Large Language Models are post-trained on language that expresses specific behavioural traits, such as curiosity, open-mindedness, and empathy, and values, such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty. This is done to increase utility, ensure safety, and improve the user experience of the people interacting with the model. However, values are complex and inter-related - incorporating one can modify behaviour on another. Further, incorporating certain values can make models more addictive or sycophantic, potentially having a detrimental effect on the user interacting with it. We investigate these and other unintended effects of value incorporation into models. We fine-tune models using value subsets of existing preference datasets, measuring the effect of value induction of 15 values on safety, anthropomorphism, and various QA benchmarks. We find that i) inducing values also leads to expression of other related, and sometimes contrastive values, ii) inducing positive values increases safety, and iii) all values increase anthropomorphic language use by models, making them more validating and sycophantic.

Abstract:
Multi-turn interaction remains challenging for online reinforcement learning. Current GRPO-based methods—either at the trajectory level or the step level—still suffer from fundamental challenges in multi-turn settings: they allocate sampling uniformly across tasks regardless of difficulty, propagate misleading learning signals that penalize correct intermediate actions in failed trajectories, and incur high sample-collection costs under long-horizon environments. Step-level variants (e.g., GIGPO) mitigate some interaction-cost constraints by decomposing trajectories, yet they retain GRPO’s sampling imbalance and still struggle with heterogeneous multi-turn tasks. To address these issues, we propose STEP (Success-rate-aware Trajectory-Efficient Policy Optimization), a framework that dynamically allocates sampling based on per-task success rates and performs fine-grained step-level optimization. STEP maintains a smoothed success-rate record to guide adaptive trajectory resampling, allocating more effort to harder tasks. It then computes success-rate-weighted advantages and decomposes trajectories into step-level samples, followed by a step-level GRPO augmentation that strengthens updates on low-success tasks. Experiments on OSWorld and AndroidWorld show that STEP substantially improves sample efficiency and training stability over both trajectory-level and existing step-level GRPO variants, converging faster and generalizing better under the same sampling budget.

Abstract:
Multi-agent debate (MAD) is an emerging approach to improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Existing MAD methods rely on multiple rounds of interaction among agents to reach consensus, and the final output is decided by majority voting in the last round. However, this consensus-based design faces several limitations. First, multiple rounds of communication increases token overhead and limits scalability. Second, due to the inherent conformity of LLMs, agents that initially produce correct responses may be influenced by incorrect ones during the debate process, causing error propagation. Third, majority voting introduces randomness and unfairness in the decision-making phase, and can degrade the reasoning performance. To address these issues, we propose Free-MAD, an alternative and novel MAD framework that eliminates the need for consensus among agents. Free-MAD introduces a novel score-based decision mechanism that evaluates the entire debate trajectory rather than relying on the last round only. This mechanism tracks how each agent’s reasoning evolves, enabling more accurate and fair outcomes. In addition, Free-MAD reconstructs the debate phase by introducing anti-conformity, a mechanism that enables agents to mitigate excessive influence from the majority. Experiments on eight benchmark datasets demonstrate that Free-MAD significantly improves reasoning performance while requiring only a single-round debate and thus reducing token costs. We also show that compared to existing MAD approaches, Free-MAD exhibits improved robustness in real-world attack scenarios.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates large language model (LLM) inference by using a smaller model to draft future tokens, which are then verified by the target LLM. This preserves generation quality by accepting only aligned tokens. However, individual drafters, often trained for specific tasks or domains, exhibit limited effectiveness across diverse applications. To address this, we introduce MetaSD, a unified framework that integrates multiple drafters into the SD process. MetaSD dynamically allocates computational resources to heterogeneous drafters by leveraging alignment feedback and framing drafter selection as a multi-armed bandit problem. Extensive experiments show MetaSD consistently outperforms single-drafter approaches.

Abstract:
Measurement scales play a crucial role in quantifying the nuanced dimensions of human cognition and behavior, however, their development typically demands extensive manual labor, and current methodologies lack systematic automation and standardized evaluation. In this paper, we introduce AutoScale, a pioneering multi-agent framework that automates scale development by leveraging collaborative AI agents. Our contributions are threefold: (1) a novel multi-agent LLM-based framework for end-to-end scale generation that replicates expert collaboration and iterative data-driven refinement, (2) the first comprehensive dataset, SCALE-1.2K, comprising 1.2K validated scales across 16 psychological domains, establishing a benchmark for automated scale development, and (3) a multi-dimensional evaluation system, featuring Muti-LLM-as-judge for conceptual and linguistic assessment and simulated large-scale testing for rigorous psychometric verification. Experimental results demonstrate that AutoScale streamlines the scale development process while maintaining rigorous quality standards, significantly reducing manual effort and paving the way for more efficient and objective measurement design in diverse research fields.

Abstract:
Recent advances in summary evaluation are based on model-based metrics to assess quality dimensions, such as completeness, conciseness, and faithfulness. However, these methods often require large language models, and predicted scores are frequently miscalibrated, limiting their reliability. Moreover, evaluating the average quality across different summaries for a single document typically requires access to multiple reference summaries. Here, we propose a general framework that generates individual and average proxy scores without relying on reference summaries, human annotations, or expensive model-based metrics. We also propose group isotonic regression binning (GIRB), a calibration method that adjusts the raw predictions to better align with ground-truth evaluation metrics. While we focus on continuous-value scenarios, such as summarization, the method is applicable to discrete-value tasks, such as question answering. Experiments on seven datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines.

Abstract:
Text-to-image generation models have achieved strong performance in culturally homogeneous settings, yet their ability to generate multicultural scenes—where people and landmarks originate from different cultures—remains largely unexplored. We introduce multicultural text-to-image generation as a new task and present the first benchmark designed to study this setting. Our dataset contains 9,000 images spanning five countries, three age groups, two genders, 25 historical landmarks, and five languages. Using this benchmark, we analyze the behavior of state-of-the-art text-to-image models across multiple dimensions, including alignment, image quality, aesthetics, knowledge, and fairness. As one strategy for composing cultural and demographic information, we explore MosAIG, a Multi-Agent framework that enhances multicultural image generation by leveraging large language models with distinct cultural personas. Our analysis shows that richer prompt composition can improve image quality and cultural grounding compared to simple prompts, while also revealing substantial disparities across languages and demographic groups. We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/AIM-SCU/MosAIG

Abstract:
Multimodal retrieval systems are expected to operate in a semantic space, agnostic to the language or cultural origin of the query. In practice, however, retrieval outcomes systematically reflect perspectival biases: deviations shaped by linguistic prevalence and cultural associations. We introduce the Cross-Cultural, Cross-Modal, Cross-lingual Multimodal (3XCM) benchmark to isolate these effects. Results from our studies indicate that, for image-to-text retrieval, models tend to favor entries from prevalent languages over those that are semantically faithful. For text-to-image retrieval, we observe a consistent "tugging effect” in the joint embedding space between semantic alignment and language-conditioned cultural association. When semantic representations are insufficiently resolved, particularly in low-resource languages, similarity is increasingly governed by culturally familiar visual patterns, leading to systematic association bias in retrieval. Our findings suggest that achieving equitable multimodal retrieval necessitates targeted strategies that explicitly decouple language from culture, rather than relying solely on broader data exposure. This work highlights the need to treat linguistic and cultural biases as distinct, measurable challenges in multimodal representation learning.

Abstract:
Recent advances in autonomous digital agents from industry (e.g., Manus AI and Gemini’s research mode) highlight their potential for structured tasks through autonomous decision-making and task decomposition, but it remains unclear how well such systems support real-world information-intensive workflows. We study this question in journalism, where newswriting requires iterative planning, contextual reasoning, and active discovery of missing background to produce a coherent article. We introduce NEWSAGENT, a benchmark for evaluating how agents search raw materials, select relevant information, and iteratively revise drafts through core journalistic functions. Given a writing instruction and partial firsthand materials, agents must identify narrative perspectives, issue keyword-based queries, retrieve historical context, and generate complete news articles. Unlike typical summarization or retrieval tasks, essential context is not directly available and must be actively discovered, reflecting real-world reporting constraints. NEWSAGENT consists of 6k human-verified examples derived from real news. We evaluate open- and closed-sourced LLMs with commonly-used agentic frameworks on NEWSAGENT, which shows that agents are capable of retrieving relevant facts but struggling with planning and narrative integration. We believe that NEWSAGENT serves a realistic testbed for iterating and evaluating agent capabilities in terms of web data manipulation to real-world productivity. The benchmark resources are publicly available at https://github.com/wywyWang/CoachAI-Projects.

Abstract:
Recent deep-thinking large language models often reason extensively to improve performance, but such lengthy reasoning is not always desirable, as it incurs excessive inference costs with disproportionate performance gains. Controlling reasoning length without sacrificing performance is therefore important, but remains challenging, especially under tight thinking budgets. We propose budget guidance, a simple yet effective method for steering the reasoning process of LLMs toward a target budget without requiring any LLM fine-tuning. Our approach introduces a lightweight predictor that models a Gamma distribution over the remaining thinking length during next-token generation. This signal is then used to guide generation in a soft, token-level manner, ensuring that the overall reasoning trace adheres to the specified thinking budget. Budget guidance enables natural control of the thinking length, along with significant token efficiency improvements over baseline methods on challenging math benchmarks. For instance, it achieves up to a 26% accuracy gain on the MATH-500 benchmark under tight budgets compared to baseline methods, while maintaining competitive accuracy with only 63% of the thinking tokens used by the full-thinking model. Budget guidance also generalizes to broader task domains and exhibits emergent capabilities, such as estimating question difficulty. We release our code and model weights at https://github.com/UMass-Embodied-AGI/BudgetGuidance.

Abstract:
We study ambiguous-query disambiguation in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Prior Diversify-then-Verify (DtV) pipelines first generate interpretations and then retrieve evidence, often introducing ungrounded queries that cannot be answered from the corpus and requiring costly post-hoc pruning and verification. We propose VerDICT, a novel approach that unifies diversification with verification by integrating retriever relevance and generator answerability feedback early. This not only reduces cascading errors but also enables parallelism. On ASQA, VerDICT improves grounding-aware F1 by an average of 23% over the strongest baselines across multiple LLM backbones.

Abstract:
Reference-free image–to–text evaluators are now standard for scoring image–caption alignment, yet it is unclear whether they respect semantic invariances. We present an invariance probe on five popular evaluators (CLIPScore, PAC-S, UMIC, FLEUR, and a deterministic LLM judge) under semantics-preserving perturbations along three axes: spatial (flips, context-preserving repositioning, light rotations), object (scale, category), and socio-linguistic framing (cultural/economic adjectives with neutral and length-matched controls). Across curated slices of three detection datasets and three caption evaluation suites, we find consistent non-semantic sensitivities: benign spatial edits and simple phrasing changes shift scores by (≈)6–9% on average, and for systems separated by just 0.7% these shifts can cause ranking flips in upto (∼)37% of cases, particularly under spatial changes. A small human study also supports this finding and confirms that annotators generally judge perturbed pairs as equally correct, so these shifts reflect metric behavior rather than semantic change. We further propose invariance-calibrated scoring, a post-hoc adjustment that roughly halves median absolute sensitivity while retaining correlation with learned caption evaluators.

Abstract:
Language-model-based agents operating over extended interaction horizons face persistent challenges in preserving temporally grounded information and maintaining behavioral consistency across sessions, a failure mode we term "soul erosion." We present BMAM (Brain-inspired Multi-Agent Memory), a general-purpose memory architecture that models agent memory as a set of functionally specialized subsystems rather than a single unstructured store. Inspired by cognitive memory systems, BMAM decomposes memory into episodic, semantic, salience-aware, and control-oriented components that operate at complementary time scales, organised as a six-phase memory lifecycle. To support long-horizon reasoning, BMAM organises episodic memories along explicit timelines and retrieves evidence by fusing multiple complementary signals. Experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark show that BMAM achieves 78.45% accuracy, outperforming seven memory-augmented baselines. Pairwise ablations reveal super-additive synergy between brain-region components rather than redundant stacking, and a Soul Portability Test demonstrates 87.5% identity-integrity across full memory export, clear, and restore. A targeted refinement of the temporal-trigger heuristics raises LongMemEval multi-session accuracy from 45.2% to 56.4%, validating the architectural decomposition behind BMAM.Code is available at https://github.com/innovation64/BMAM.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding has rapidly emerged as a leading approach for accelerating language model (LM) inference, as it offers substantial speedups while yielding identical outputs. This relies upon a small draft model, tasked with predicting the outputs of the target model. State-of-the-art speculative decoding methods use a draft model comprising a single decoder layer and output embedding matrix, with the latter dominating drafting time for the latest LMs. Recent work has sought to address this output distribution bottleneck by reducing the vocabulary of the draft model. While this can improve throughput, it compromises speculation effectiveness when the target token is out-of-vocabulary. In this paper, we argue for vocabulary speculation as an alternative to a reduced vocabulary. We propose SpecVocab, an efficient and effective method that selects a vocabulary subset per decoding step. Across a variety of tasks, we show that SpecVocab can achieve a higher acceptance length than state-of-the-art speculative decoding method, EAGLE-3. Notably, this yields up to an 8.1% increase in average throughput over EAGLE-3.

Abstract:
Humans often hold different perspectives on the same issues. In many NLP tasks, annotation disagreement can reflect valid subjective perspectives. Modeling annotator perspectives and understanding their relationship with other human factors, such as socio-demographic attributes, have received increasing attention. Prior work typically focuses on single demographic factors or limited combinations. However, in real-world settings, annotator perspectives are shaped by complex social contexts, and finer-grained socio-demographic attributes can better explain human perspectives. In this work, we propose Socio-Contrastive Learning, a method that jointly models annotator perspectives while learning socio-demographic representations. Our method provides an effective approach for the fusion of socio-demographic features and textual representations to predict annotator perspectives, outperforming standard concatenation-based methods. The learned representations further enable analysis and visualization of how demographic factors relate to variation in annotator perspectives. Our code is available at GitHub: https://github.com/Leixin-Zhang/Socio_Contrastive_Learning

Abstract:
Style representation learning is a powerful tool for authorship analysis and modeling writing style, yet the latent nature of learned representations makes them difficult to interpret. Recent work has attempted to explain these representations by generating natural language descriptions with large language models (LLMs) conditioned on input text. However, such descriptions are often prone to the LLM’s biases and hallucinations, and they lack an explicit objective and practical utility. In this work, we propose a novel framework for interpreting style representations through style-eliciting prompts: natural language instructions designed to steer LLMs to generate text that reflects specific stylistic attributes. We curate 1,010 distinct style features spanning 26 stylistic categories and construct a dataset by prompting an LLM to generate text conditioned on these features. Using this data, we train a decoder to generate a style prompt from the style representation of the generated text. We evaluate our approach on three tasks: (1) recovering original style prompts from generated text, (2) generating text in the same style using the recovered prompts, and (3) steering LLM outputs to match the style of human-written texts. Experiments demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms strong baselines that directly prompt LLMs with target text, achieving superior performance in both style description and style imitation. These results highlight style-eliciting prompts can provide a practical and interpretable interface to stylistic information encoded in style representations.

Abstract:
A key challenge for large language models is token cost per query and overall deployment cost. Clinical inputs are long, heterogeneous, and often redundant, while downstream tasks are short and high stakes. We study budgeted context selection, where a subset of document units is chosen under a strict token budget so an off-the-shelf generator can meet fixed cost and latency constraints. We cast this as a knapsack-constrained subset selection problem with two design choices, unitization that defines document segmentation and selection that determines which units are kept.We propose RCD, a monotone submodular objective that balances relevance, coverage, and diversity. We compare sentence, section, window, and cluster-based unitization, and introduce a routing heuristic that adapts to the budget regime. Experiments on MIMIC discharge notes, Cochrane abstracts, and L-Eval show that optimal strategies depend on the evaluation setting. Positional heuristics perform best at low budgets in extractive tasks, while diversity-aware methods such as MMR improve LLM generation. Selector choice matters more than unitization, with cluster-based grouping reducing performance and other schemes behaving similarly. ROUGE saturates for LLM summaries, while BERTScore better reflects quality differences.

Abstract:
Masked Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to traditional Autoregressive Models (ARMs). DLMs employ transformer encoders with bidirectional attention, enabling parallel token generation while maintaining competitive performance. Although their efficiency and effectiveness have been extensively studied, the internal mechanisms that govern DLMs remain largely unexplored. In this work, we conduct an empirical analysis of DLM attention patterns, focusing on the attention sinking phenomenon, an effect previously observed in various transformer-based architectures. Our findings reveal that DLMs also exhibit attention sinks, but with distinct characteristics. First, unlike in ARMs, the sink positions in DLMs tend to shift throughout the generation process, displaying a dynamic behaviour. Second, while ARMs are highly sensitive to the removal of attention sinks, DLMs remain robust: masking sinks leads to only a minor degradation in performance. These results provide new insights into the inner workings of diffusion-based language models and highlight fundamental differences in how they allocate and utilize attention compared to autoregressive models.

Abstract:
Human experts tackle difficult math problems by identifying and executing a few pivotal steps rather than listing every intermediate thought. In contrast, standard Chain-of-Thought (CoT) distillation trains small models on lengthy reasoning traces, encouraging a uniform overthinking style across easy and hard items alike. The result is rigid, slow solutions that sacrifice adaptivity. This approach stands in sharp contrast to human intuition. Humans naturally adapt their problem-solving strategy, dedicating significant effort to difficult problems while finding quick, simple solutions for easier ones. We argue that the root cause lies in the training data: it contains excess information and reasoning steps organized in ways misaligned with human practice. We address this with Difficulty-Aware Distillation(DAD), a procedure for producing training data that mirrors concise human reasoning. A large teacher model first assesses a problem’s difficulty and then rewrites the solution to retain only the essential steps. Using this process, we constructed LiteCoT, a 100,000-example corpus of short, clear rationales, and used it to train our Liter models. With 100k LiteCoT, we outperform models trained on 800k long CoT and cut both training and inference costs. The advantage is consistent across standard math benchmarks, showing that concise, human-aligned data delivers equal or better accuracy with much less compute. For example, on the challenging AIME24 exam, our approach reaches 74.2% Pass@1 using only about 5K inference tokens, surpassing other methods that consume many more tokens.

Abstract:
Incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream tasks has recently garnered considerable attention, where fine-tuning plays a key role in LLMs’ adaptation. These LLMs, often consisting of billions of parameters, require vast amounts of computational resources when customizing them for new tasks. To mitigate this, researchers have proposed the parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) as a practical solution by adjusting fewer parameters of a pre-trained LLM. However, these methods heavily rely on their own structural modifications that fail to establish an efficient knowledge-sharing mechanism to distill rich knowledge from other expert models, which may lead to inefficient fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose Pen2Sword, a lightweight fine-tuning framework for domain adaptation which efficiently transfers knowledge from a small expert model to a target large model via embedding layers, significantly enhancing the fine-tuning efficiency of large models. Specifically, we first selects optimal expert models via a preserving function, then facilitates knowledge transfer through vocabulary alignment and embedding expansion, and finally accelerates domain adaptation with a fast fine-tuning paradigm. Extensive empirical evaluations across multiple domains demonstrate that our Pen2Sword framework consistently accelerates domain-specific fine-tuning, improves model performance (e.g., +13.6% in code and +20.1% in math), and remains robust across diverse model families and PEFT methods. The codes and data are available at https://github.com/pengmeishu/Pen2Sword.

Abstract:
Designing effective task-level prompts is crucial for improving the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). While prior work on instruction induction demonstrates that LLMs can infer better instructions with limited examples, existing approaches often rely on input-output pairs, where obtaining labeled answers can be difficult or costly. To address this limitation, we propose Strategy-Induct, a framework that derives task-level instructions solely from a small set of example questions without requiring labeled answers. Our approach first prompts the model to generate explicit reasoning strategies for each question, forming (strategy, question) pairs. These pairs are then used to induce a task instruction that guides reasoning. Experiments across multiple tasks and model scales demonstrate that Strategy-Induct outperforms state-of-the-art methods in question-only settings. Furthermore, we observe that jointly utilizing LLMs and Large Reasoning Models for both task instruction generation and inference can lead to further performance improvements.

Abstract:
One of the key factors influencing the reasoning capabilities of LLM-based agents is their ability to leverage long-term memory. Integrating long-term memory mechanisms allows agents to make informed decisions grounded in historical interactions. While recent advances have significantly improved the storage and retrieval components—e.g., by encoding memory into dense vectors for similarity search or organizing memory as structured knowledge graphs—most existing approaches fall short in memory updating. In particular, they lack mechanisms for dynamically refining preference memory representations in response to evolving user behaviors and contexts. To address this gap, we propose a Preference-Aware Memory Update Mechanism (PAMU) that enables dynamic and personalized memory refinement. By integrating sliding window averages (SW) with exponential moving averages (EMA), PAMU constructs a fused preference-aware representation that captures both short-term fluctuations and long-term user tendencies. We conduct experiments on five task scenarios of the LoCoMo dataset, and the results show that our mechanism can significantly improve the output quality of LLM in five baselines, validating its effectiveness in long-term conversations.

Abstract:
Do reasoning models have "Aha!" moments?Prior work suggests that models like DeepSeek-R1-Zero undergo sudden mid-trace realizations that lead to accurate outputs, implying an intrinsic capacity for self-correction. Yet, it remains unclear whether such intrinsic shifts in reasoning strategy actually improve performance.Here, we study mid-reasoning shifts and instrument training runs to detect them. Our analysis spans 1M+ reasoning traces, hundreds of training checkpoints, three reasoning domains, and multiple decoding temperatures and model architectures.We find that reasoning shifts are rare, do not become more frequent with training, and seldom improve accuracy, indicating that they do not correspond to prior perceptions of model insight. However, their effect varies with model uncertainty. Building on this finding, we show that artificially triggering extrinsic shifts under high entropy reliably improves accuracy. Our results show that mid-reasoning shifts are symptoms of unstable inference behavior rather than an intrinsic mechanism for self-correction.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited strong reasoning capabilities and achieved remarkable performance in mathematical problem-solving tasks. Recently, distilling reasoning ability from long-form Chains-of-Thought (CoTs) has emerged as a promising approach for enhancing Small Language Models (SLMs). Existing studies typically treat SLMs as student models and use long-form CoTs as supervision signals for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) to transfer reasoning ability. However, such long-form CoT teachers are usually unaware of the student model’s capacity, which limits the effective utilization of the provided reasoning traces. To overcome this limitation, we propose error-aware self-reflection (ORION), a framework that refines teacher CoTs through an Error-Aware Reflection process. ORION enables the student model to construct more tailored teacher CoTs by refining teacher CoTs and incorporating its own reasoning errors. Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ORION consistently improves performance by more than 2% over all baselines. Further analysis reveals that the CoTs constructed by ORION exhibit higher coherence and logical consistency, thereby serving as more effective supervision signals for SFT. All codes are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/ORION.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) enable complex problem-solving but introduce significant debugging challenges, characterized by long interaction traces, inter-agent dependencies, and delayed error manifestation. Existing diagnostic approaches often rely on expensive expert annotation or ”LLM-as-a-judge” paradigms, which struggle to pinpoint decisive error steps within extended contexts. In this paper, we introduce ErrorProbe, a self-improving framework for semantic failure attribution that identifies responsible agents and the originating error step. The framework operates via a three-stage pipeline: (1) operationalizing the MAS failure taxonomy to detect local anomalies, (2) performing symptom-driven backward tracing to prune irrelevant context, and (3) employing a specialized multi-agent team (Strategist, Investigator, Arbiter) to validate error hypotheses through tool-grounded execution. Crucially, ErrorProbe maintains a verified episodic memory that updates only when error patterns are confirmed by executable evidence, without the need for annotation. Experiments across the TracerTraj and Who When benchmarks demonstrate that ErrorProbe significantly outperforms baselines, particularly in step-level localization, while the verified memory enables robust cross-domain transfer without retraining.

Abstract:
Existing benchmarks treat multi-turn conversation and reasoning-intensive retrieval separately, yet real-world information seeking requires both. To bridge this gap, we present a benchmark for reasoning-based conversational information retrieval comprising 707 conversations (2,971 turns) across eleven domains. To ensure quality, our Decomposition-and-Verification framework transforms complex queries into fact-grounded multi-turn dialogues through multi-level validation, where atomic facts are verified against sources and explicit retrieval reasoning is generated for each turn. Comprehensive evaluation reveals that combining conversation history with reasoning doubles retrieval performance (Baseline .236 → History+Reasoning .479 nDCG@10), while reasoning-specialized models substantially outperform dense encoders. Despite these gains, further analysis highlights that implicit reasoning remains challenging, particularly when logical connections are not explicitly stated in the text. []

Abstract:
Instruction-tuned language models increasingly rely on large multi-turn dialogue corpora, but these datasets are often noisy and structurally inconsistent, with topic drift, repetitive chitchat, and mismatched answer formats across turns. We address this from a data selection perspective and propose MDS (Multi-turn Dialogue Selection), a dialogue-level framework that scores whole conversations rather than isolated turns. MDS combines a global coverage stage that performs bin-wise selection in the user-query trajectory space to retain representative yet non-redundant dialogues, with a local structural stage that evaluates within-dialogue reliability through entity-grounded topic grounding and information progress, together with query-answer form consistency for functional alignment. MDS outperforms strong single-turn selectors, dialogue-level LLM scorers, and heuristic baselines on three multi-turn benchmarks and an in-domain Banking test set, achieving the best overall rank across reference-free and reference-based metrics, and is more robust on long conversations under the same training budget. Code and resources are included in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
The rapid evolution of Large Language Model (LLM) agents has necessitated robust memory systems to support cohesive long-term interaction and complex reasoning. Benefiting from the strong capabilities of LLMs, recent research focus has shifted from simple context extension to the development of dedicated agentic memory systems. However, existing approaches typically rely on rigid retrieval granularity, accumulation-heavy maintenance strategies, and coarse-grained update mechanisms. These design choices create a persistent mismatch between stored information and task-specific reasoning demands, while leading to the unchecked accumulation of logical inconsistencies over time. To address these challenges, we propose Adaptive Memory via Multi-Agent Collaboration (AMA), a novel framework that leverages coordinated agents to manage memory across multiple granularities. AMA employs a hierarchical memory design that dynamically aligns retrieval granularity with task complexity. Specifically, the Constructor and Retriever jointly enable multi-granularity memory construction and adaptive query routing. The Judge verifies the relevance and consistency of retrieved content, triggering iterative retrieval when evidence is insufficient or invoking the Refresher upon detecting logical conflicts. The Refresher then enforces memory consistency by performing targeted updates or removing outdated entries. Extensive experiments on challenging long-context benchmarks show that AMA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while reducing token consumption by approximately 80% compared to full-context methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in maintaining retrieval precision and long-term memory consistency.

Abstract:
Identifying conditions that a certain drug takes therapeutic effect on a target disease is crucial for clinical decision-making support. However, most existing biomedical information extraction methods have focused on identifying only relations between drugs and diseases, while largely overlooking the context-specific conditions where such relations can apply. To address this problem, we introduce the task of applicability condition extraction for therapeutic drug–disease relations from biomedical research literature. We create the first dataset that has manually annotated triples of drugs, diseases, and applicability conditions on biomedical paper abstracts with 1,119 drug-disease pairs. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluate the performance of a range of existing methods. In addition, we propose a new method that enhances LoRA to consider relations between drugs and diseases. Our method consistently outperforms strong baselines across different evaluation settings.

Abstract:
Long-document question answering is challenging because relevant evidence is often scattered across distant sections. Traditional long-document QA/RAG pipelines often suffer from context fragmentation, retrieving locally plausible but structurally misaligned passages. We present the Hierarchical Quantized Document R etriever (HQDR), a framework that aligns hierarchical graph representations with a universal token vocabulary and integrates explicit structure into retrieval. By grounding continuous structural features in a fixed, discrete semantic space, HQDR captures universal hierarchical patterns rather than overfitting to specific layouts. We further propose a hybrid scoring mechanism that decouples semantic matching from structural alignment. Extensive experiments on QASPER and Natural Questions demonstrate that HQDR achieves consistent gains over strong baselines and exhibits superior robustness when transferring between datasets with distinct structural characteristics.

Abstract:
Event prediction plays a critical role in high-stakes applications such as military operations, public safety, and healthcare. Current methods learn temporal knowledge graphs to predict events at future timestamps, and the predictions directly influence decision-making and resource allocation. However, these methods lack rigorous uncertainty quantification, which limits their reliability for decision-making, especially in high-stakes scenarios where the cost of errors is high. In this paper, we propose CFEP, a conformal prediction framework tailored for event prediction to address this challenge. This is achieved through end-to-end optimization that ensures coverage while improving efficiency. Specifically, we first introduce non-conformity score diffusion, which captures both topological and temporal uncertainty in temporal knowledge graphs. Additionally, we propose an efficiency-aware optimization algorithm to reduce the coverage gap and improve computational efficiency. Experimental results on three public datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently guarantees statistical coverage while improving efficiency. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/hucheng-IIE/CFEP.

Abstract:
Reasoning language models are controlled through explicit modes such as Think and No-think, yet we find that these behaviors are largely governed by a few token-level triggers rather than high-level instructions. Through attention analysis and controlled prompting experiments, we show that a leading “Okay” token induces reasoning behavior, while the newline pattern following ‘‘ suppresses it. Based on this observation, we propose Mid-Think, a simple training-free prompting format that combines these triggers to achieve intermediate-budget reasoning, consistently outperforming fixed-token and prompt-based baselines in terms of the accuracy–length trade-off. Furthermore, applying Mid-Think to RL training after SFT reduces training time by approximately 15% while improving final performance of Qwen3-8B on AIME from 69.8% to 72.4% and on GPQA from 58.5% to 61.1%, demonstrating its effectiveness for both inference-time control and RL-based reasoning training.

Abstract:
The efficacy of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is critically dependent on the quality of their training data, requiring a precise balance between visual fidelity and instruction-following capability. Existing datasets, however, are plagued by inconsistent quality, and current data filtering methods rely on coarse-grained scores that lack the granularity to identify nuanced semantic flaws like logical fallacies or factual errors. This creates a fundamental bottleneck in developing more reliable models. To address this, we make three core contributions. First, we construct a large-scale, 300K-sample benchmark by systematically injecting diverse, subtle defects to provide a challenging testbed for data auditing. Second, we introduce a novel "Decomposition-then-Evaluation" paradigm that breaks model responses into constituent cognitive components: visual description, subjective inference, and factual claim, enabling targeted analysis. Third, we instantiate this paradigm via EVIAN (Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data AuditiNg), an automated framework that evaluates these components along the orthogonal axes of Image-Text Consistency, Logical Coherence, and Factual Accuracy. Our empirical findings challenge the prevailing scale-centric paradigm: a model fine-tuned on a compact, high-quality subset curated by EVIAN consistently surpassed models trained on orders-of-magnitude larger datasets. We also reveal that dividing complex auditing into verifiable subtasks enables robust curation, and that Logical Coherence is the most critical factor in data quality evaluation.

Abstract:
The Unigram tokenization algorithm offers a probabilistic alternative to the greedy heuristics of Byte-Pair Encoding. Despite its theoretical elegance, its implementation in practice is complex, limiting its adoption to the SentencePiece package and adapters thereof. We bridge this gap between theory and practice by providing a clear guide to implementation and parameter choices. We also identify a simpler algorithm that accepts slightly higher training loss in exchange for improved compression.

Abstract:
Efficient long-sequence generation is a critical challenge for Large Language Models. While recent sparse decoding methods improve efficiency, they suffer from KV cache misalignment, where approximation errors accumulate and degrade generation quality. In this work, we propose Rectified Sparse Attention (ReSA), a simple yet effective method that combines block-sparse attention with periodic dense rectification. By refreshing the KV cache at fixed intervals using a dense forward pass, ReSA bounds error accumulation and preserves alignment with the pretraining distribution. Experiments across math reasoning, language modeling, and retrieval tasks demonstrate that ReSA achieves near-lossless generation quality with significantly improved efficiency. Notably, ReSA delivers up to 3.77x end-to-end speedup under decoding at 256K sequence length, making it a practical solution for scalable long-context inference.

Abstract:
Nowadays, wearable devices can continuously lifelog ambient conversations, creating substantial opportunities for memory systems. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on online one-on-one chatting or human-AI interactions, thus neglecting the unique demands of real-world scenarios. Given the scarcity of public lifelogging audio datasets, we propose a hierarchical synthesis framework to curate LifelogBench, a novel benchmark comprising two complementary subsets: EgoMem, built on real-world egocentric videos, and LifeMem, constructed using simulated virtual community. Crucially, to address the issue of temporal leakage in traditional offline settings, we propose an Online Evaluation protocol that strictly adheres to temporal causality, ensuring systems are evaluated in a realistic streaming fashion. Our experimental results reveal a counterintuitive finding: current sophisticated memory systems fail to outperform a simple RAG-based baseline. This highlights the detrimental impact of over-designed structures and lossy compression in current approaches, emphasizing the necessity of high-fidelity context preservation for lifelog scenarios.

Abstract:
Impressive progress has been made in automated problem-solving by the collaboration of large language model (LLM) based agents. However, these automated capabilities also open avenues for malicious applications. In this paper, we study a new threat that LLMs pose to online pseudonymity, called automated profile inference, where an adversary can instruct LLMs to automatically collect and extract sensitive personal attributes from publicly available user activities on pseudonymous platforms. We also introduce an automated profiling framework called AutoProfiler to demonstrate and assess the feasibility of such attacks in real-world scenarios. AutoProfiler consists of four specialized LLM agents that work collaboratively to retrieve and process user online activities and generate a profile with extracted personal information. Experimental results on two real-world datasets and one synthetic dataset show that AutoProfiler is highly effective and efficient, and the inferred attributes are both identifiable and sensitive, posing significant privacy risks. We explore mitigation strategies from different perspectives and advocate for increased public awareness of this emerging privacy threat.

Abstract:
Tool-integrated agents are deployed on the premise that external tools ground their outputs in reality. Yet this very reliance creates a critical attack surface. Current evaluations benchmark capability in benign settings, asking "can the agent use tools correctly" but never "what if the tools lie". We identify this Trust Gap: agents are evaluated for performance, not for skepticism. We formalize this vulnerability as Adversarial Environmental Injection (AEI), a threat model where adversaries compromise tool outputs to deceive agents. AEI constitutes environmental deception: constructing a "fake world" of poisoned search results and fabricated reference networks around unsuspecting agents. We operationalize this via Potemkin, a Model Context Protocol (MCP)-compatible harness for plug-and-play robustness testing. We identify two orthogonal attack surfaces: The Illusion (breadth attacks) poison retrieval to induce epistemic drift toward false beliefs, while The Maze (depth attacks) exploit structural traps to cause policy collapse into infinite loops. Across 11,000+ runs on five frontier agents, we find a stark robustness gap: resistance to one attack often increases vulnerability to the other, demonstrating that epistemic and navigational robustness are distinct capabilities.

Abstract:
Not Safe for Work (NSFW) image classifiers play a critical role in safeguarding text-to-image (T2I) systems. However, a concerning phenomenon has emerged in T2I systems – changes in text prompts that manipulate benign image elements can result in failed detection by NSFW classifiers – dubbed "context shifts." For instance, while a NSFW image of "a nude person in an empty scene" can be easily blocked by most NSFW classifiers, a stealthier one that depicts "a nude person blending in a group of dressed people" may evade detection. We ask: how to systematically reveal NSFW image classifiers’ failure against such context shifts?Towards this end, we present an automated red-teaming framework that leverages a set of generative AI tools. We propose an exploration-exploitation approach: First, in the exploration stage, we synthesize a diverse and massive 36K NSFW image dataset that facilitates our study of context shifts. We find that varying fractions (e.g., 4.1% to 36% nude and sexual content) of the dataset are misclassified by NSFW image classifiers like GPT-4o and Gemini. Second, in the exploitation stage, we leverage these failure cases to train a specialized LLM that rewrites unseen seed prompts into more evasive versions, increasing the likelihood of detection evasion by up to 6 times. Alarmingly, we show these failures translate to real-world T2I and even T2V systems like DALL-E 3, Sora, Nano Banana, and Veo 3 – beyond the open-weight image generators in our main study. For example, querying DALL-E 3 with prompts rewritten by our approach increases the chance of obtaining NSFW images from 0 to over 50%.

Abstract:
Class imbalance is a widespread challenge in NLP tasks, significantly hindering robust performance across diverse domains and applications. We introduce Hardness-Aware Meta-Resample (HAMR), a unified framework that adaptively addresses both class imbalance and data difficulty. HAMR employs bi-level optimizations to dynamically estimate instance-level weights that prioritize genuinely challenging samples and minority classes, while a neighborhood-aware resampling mechanism amplifies training focus on hard examples and their semantically similar neighbors. We validate HAMR on six imbalanced datasets covering multiple tasks and spanning biomedical, disaster response, and sentiment domains. Experimental results show that HAMR achieves substantial improvements for minority classes and consistently outperforms strong baselines. Extensive ablation studies demonstrate that our proposed modules synergistically contribute to performance gains and highlight HAMR as a flexible and generalizable approach for class imbalance adaptation.

Abstract:
Applying large language models (LLMs) to assist in psycho-counseling is an emerging and meaningful approach, driven by the significant gap between patient needs and the availability of mental health support. However, current LLMs struggle to consistently provide effective responses to client speeches, largely due to the lack of supervision from high-quality real psycho-counseling data, whose content is typically inaccessible due to client privacy concerns. Furthermore, the quality of therapists’ responses in available sessions can vary significantly based on their professional training and experience. Assessing the quality of therapists’ responses remains an open challenge. We address these challenges by first proposing a set of professional and comprehensive principles to evaluate therapists’ responses to client speeches. Using these principles, we create a Psycho-Counseling Preference dataset, PsyCoPref, which contains 36k high-quality preference comparison pairs. This dataset aligns with the preferences of professional psychotherapists, providing a robust foundation for evaluating and improving LLMs in psycho-counseling. Experiments on reward modeling and preference learning demonstrate that PsyCoPref is an excellent resource for LLMs to acquire essential skills for responding to clients in a counseling session. Our best-aligned model achieves an impressive win rate of 87% against GPT-4o.

Abstract:
Activation steering has emerged as a powerful tool to shape LLM behaviour without the need for weight updates. While its inherent brittleness and unreliability are well-documented, its safety implications remain underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic safety audit of steering vectors obtained with Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA), a widely used steering approach, under a unified evaluation protocol. We show that steering vectors consistently influence the success rate of jailbreak attacks, with stronger amplification under simple template-based attacks. Across LLM families and sizes, steering the model in specific directions can drastically increase (by up to 57%) or decrease (by up to 50%) its attack success rate (ASR), depending on the targeted behaviour. We attribute this phenomenon to the overlap between the steering vectors and the latent subspace of refusal behaviour. Thus, we offer a mechanistic explanation for this discovery. Together, our findings reveal the previously unobserved origin of this safety gap in LLMs, highlighting a trade-off between controllability and safety. We release our code at https://github.com/yetiiil/analyse-sv-safety.

Abstract:
The remarkable progress of vision–language models (VLMs) has enabled computer-use agents to interact with computers in a human-like manner. Yet real-world computer-use tasks remain difficult due to long-horizon workflows, diverse interfaces, and frequent intermediate errors. Prior work equips agents with external memory built from large collections of trajectories, but relies on flat retrieval over discrete summaries or continuous embeddings, falling short of the structured organization and self-evolving characteristics of human memory. Inspired by the brain, we propose Hybrid Self-evolving Structured Memory (HyMEM), a graph-based memory that couples discrete high-level symbolic nodes with continuous trajectory embeddings. HyMEM maintains a graph structure to support multi-hop retrieval, self-evolution via node update operations, and on-the-fly working-memory refreshing during inference. Extensive experiments show that HyMEM consistently improves open-source computer-use agents, enabling 7B/8B backbones to match or surpass strong closed-source models; notably, it boosts Qwen2.5-VL-7B by +22.5% and outperforms Gemini2.5-Pro-Vision and GPT-4o.

Abstract:
We present a neuromuscular speech interface that translates silently voiced articulations directly into text. We record surface electromyographic (EMG) signals from multiple articulatory sites on the face and neck as participants silently articulate speech, enabling direct EMG-to-text translation. Such an interface has the potential to restore communication for individuals who have lost the ability to produce intelligible speech due to laryngectomy, neuromuscular disease, stroke, or trauma-induced damage (e.g., radiotherapy toxicity) to the speech articulators. Prior work has largely focused on mapping EMG collected during audible articulation to time-aligned audio targets or transferring these targets to silent EMG recordings, which inherently requires audio and limits applicability to patients who can no longer speak. In contrast, we propose an efficient representation of high-dimensional EMG signals and demonstrate direct sequence-to-sequence EMG-to-text conversion at the phonemic level without relying on time-aligned audio.

Abstract:
Preference optimization is fundamental for aligning large language models. While existing methods use sample weighting, they typically rely on static functions of instantaneous model states and ignore temporal learning dynamics. We contend that a sample’s value evolves throughout training, characterized by patterns such as stable convergence or noisy oscillation. We propose MetaPO, a framework that meta-learns adaptive weights using three temporal features: reward margin evolution, learning volatility, and reference deviation. Through bilevel optimization on validation data, MetaPO automatically discovers weighting strategies tailored to specific datasets. Experiments on models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters demonstrate statistically significant improvements over strong baselines, achieving gains of up to 2.4 points on AlpacaEval 2.0 and Arena-Hard. Interpretability analysis confirms that temporal features drive over 70% of the weighting decisions and that the learned weights correlate strongly with sample quality.

Abstract:
Currently, large language models (LLMs) predominantly focus on the text modality. To enable more natural human-AI interaction, speech LLMs are emerging, but building effective end-to-end speech LLMs remains challenging due to limited data and the difficulty in expanding to more languages. In this paper, we introduce C ross-lingual S peech L anguage M odel ( CSLM ), an efficient training method for cross-lingual speech LLMs based on discrete speech tokens. We propose a novel alignment strategy that achieves cross-modal and cross-lingual alignment through continual pre-training. By conducting instruction fine-tuning following a speech-text interleaved chain-of-modality generation process, we enhance modal alignment at a finer granularity, thereby improving generation quality and reducing latency. CSLM aligns different modalities and languages simultaneously without the need for massive speech data, thus exhibiting good language scalability. Evaluations on cross-modal tasks, mono-lingual conversational tasks, and cross-lingual conversational tasks demonstrate CSLM’s strong cross-modal alignment capabilities and general task abilities.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling improves the reasoning performance of large language models but often results in token-inefficient overthinking, where models continue reasoning beyond what is necessary for a correct answer. Existing dynamic early-exit methods typically rely on single-step confidence signals, which are often unreliable for detecting reasoning convergence in multi-step settings. To mitigate this limitation, we propose TRACE, a training-free framework for efficient test-time scaling that determines when to terminate reasoning based on temporal aggregation of multi-step evidence rather than instantaneous signals. TRACE detects reasoning convergence over time by aggregating two complementary signals across recent reasoning steps: answer consistency, capturing the persistence of predicted answers, and confidence trajectory, modeling the temporal evolution of model confidence. Benefiting from these two factors, TRACE can accurately determine whether the reasoning process has converged, thereby promptly halting inference and effectively avoiding redundant reasoning steps. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging benchmarks show that TRACE reduces reasoning token usage by 25–30% on average while maintaining accuracy within 1–2% of full-length reasoning, consistently outperforming existing dynamic reasoning methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) Agents exhibit inherent reasoning abilities through the collaboration of multiple tools.However, during agent inference, existing methods often suffer from (i) locally myopic generation, due to the absence of lookahead, and (ii) trajectory instability, where minor early errors can escalate into divergent reasoning paths. These issues make it difficult to balance global effectiveness and computational efficiency. To address these two issues, we propose meta-adaptive exploration with LLM agents (MAXS)[], a meta-adaptive reasoning framework based on LLM Agents that flexibly integrates tool execution and reasoning planning. MAXS employs a lookahead strategy to extend reasoning paths a few steps ahead, estimating the advantage value of tool usage, and combines step consistency variance and inter-step trend slopes to jointly select stable, consistent, and high-value reasoning steps. Additionally, we introduce a trajectory convergence mechanism that controls computational cost by halting further rollouts once path consistency is achieved, enabling a balance between resource efficiency and global effectiveness in multi-tool reasoning. We conduct extensive empirical studies across three base models (MiMo-VL-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B, Qwen2.5-VL-32B) and five datasets, demonstrating that MAXS consistently outperforms existing methods in both performance and inference efficiency. Further analysis confirms the effectiveness of our lookahead strategy and tool usage.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models(LRMs) have achieved significant breakthroughs over prior large language models (LLMs), but they also entail greater potential safety risks. Existing alignment methods often remain at a shallow level of protection, making them insufficient to address deeper risks and strategic attacks in complex reasoning processes. To bridge this gap, we move beyond the conventional paradigm that treats safety alignment merely as a preventive measure to reduce harmful outputs. Drawing inspiration from human-like introspection and self-correction, we propose Self-Reflection, a technique that introduces a special Self-Reflection token, enabling LRMs to perform Self-Reflection during generation and recover from harmful outputs. Our approach integrates seamlessly into standard post-training paradigms , further enhancing both helpfulness and safety. The experimental results demonstrate that models trained with Self-Reflection not only consistently outperform the baseline in terms of safety (reducing the HCR from 13.8% to 4.1%, nearly a threefold improvement over mainstream approaches), but also achieve substantial advantages in both helpfulness and the safety–helpfulness balance. More importantly, under evaluations involving various adversarial attacks, including a specially designed adaptive attack, the Self-Reflection mechanism significantly enhances model safety without targeted adversarial training.Notice: This paper contains harmful content.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning-intensive tasks. However, these models exhibit unexpected brittleness, often failing on simple variations of the same underlying task. Existing robustness evaluations predominantly rely on hand-crafted templates or a limited set of perturbation rules. Consequently, such approaches lack the adaptability to probe latent vulnerabilities unique to specific models and remain susceptible to data contamination. To address this, we propose the Math Stress Tester (MaSTer), an automated framework inspired by software stress testing. MaSTer generates adversarial variants via a multi-round rewrite-verify loop, ensuring semantic consistency while successfully inducing model failure. Our framework generates benchmark variants dynamically for each LLM, thus minimizing the risk of data contamination. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH-500 demonstrate the effectiveness of MaSTer on mathematical tasks. Additionally, we validate the framework’s extensibility to non-mathematical tasks, highlighting its broad applicability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the synthesized variants generated by MaSTer can be utilized as a fine-tuning dataset to significantly enhance the model’s robustness.

Abstract:
Recently, long-thought reasoning LLMs, such as OpenAI’s O1, adopt extended reasoning processes similar to how humans ponder over complex problems. This reasoning paradigm significantly enhances the model’s problem-solving abilities and achieves promising results. However, long-thought reasoning process leads to a substantial increase in inference time. A pressing challenge is reducing the inference overhead of long-thought LLMs while ensuring accuracy. In this paper, we identify that long-thought reasoning models struggle to effectively allocate token budgets based on problem difficulty and reasoning redundancies. To address this, we propose Length-Harmonizing Fine-Tuning (O1-Pruner), aiming at minimizing reasoning overhead while maintaining accuracy. This effective fine-tuning method first estimates the LLM’s baseline performance through pre-sampling and then uses RL-style fine-tuning to encourage the model to generate shorter reasoning processes under accuracy constraints. This allows the model to achieve efficient reasoning with lower redundancy while maintaining accuracy. Experiments on various mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that O1-Pruner not only significantly reduces inference overhead but also achieves higher accuracy, providing a novel and promising solution to this challenge.

Abstract:
Multilingual retrieval-augmented generation (MRAG) requires models to effectively acquire and integrate beneficial external knowledge from multilingual collections. However, most existing studies employ a unitive process where queries of equivalent semantics across different languages are processed through a single-turn retrieval and subsequent optimization. Such a “one-size-fits-all” strategy is often suboptimal in multilingual settings, as the models occur to knowledge bias and conflict during the interaction with the search engine. To alleviate the issues, we propose LcRL, a multilingual search-augmented reinforcement learning framework that integrates a language-coupled Group Relative Policy Optimization into the policy and reward models. We adopt the language-coupled group sampling in the rollout module to reduce knowledge bias, and regularize an auxiliary anti-consistency penalty in the reward models to mitigate the knowledge conflict. Experimental results demonstrate that not only achieves competitive performance but is also appropriate for various practical scenarios such as constrained training data and retrieval over collections encompassing a large number of languages. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/LcRL-B4EF.

Abstract:
Current reinforcement learning objectives for large-model reasoning primarily focus on maximizing expected rewards. This paradigm can lead to overfitting to dominant reward signals, while neglecting alternative yet valid reasoning trajectories, thereby limiting diversity and exploration. To address this issue, we introduce Learning Advantage Distributions (LAD), a distribution-matching framework that replaces advantage maximization with learning the advantage-induced distribution. By establishing the equivalence between the optimal policy update and an advantage-based target distribution, we derive a practical LAD objective formulated as minimizing an f -divergence between the policy-induced and advantage-induced distributions. This yields a gradient update that increases likelihood for high-advantage responses while suppressing over-confident probability growth, preventing collapse without requiring auxiliary entropy regularization. LAD incurs no extra training cost compared to GRPO and scales naturally to LLM post-training. In a controlled bandit setting, LAD faithfully recovers the multimodal advantage distribution, validating the theoretical formulation. Experiments on math and code reasoning tasks across several LLM backbones show that LAD reliably improves both accuracy and generative diversity.

Abstract:
Resource constraints often limit the parameter capacity of Large Language Models (LLMs), thereby hindering their performance. Although existing approaches leverage parameter sharing to reuse a fixed set of parameters within constrained budgets, they typically require each layer to fulfill multiple roles over a fixed number of iterations. This design compromises both efficiency and adaptability. In this work, we propose the Zero Token Transformer (ZTT), which employs a head-tail decoupled parameter cycling strategy. Specifically, we decouple the first (head) and last (tail) layers from the parameter cycling process, enabling iterative refinement solely within the intermediate layers. Furthermore, we introduce a Zero-Token Mechanism, wherein a virtual token with a trainable key and a zero-valued vector functions as a standard token. The resulting attention scores not only reflect the computational significance of each layer but also facilitate dynamic early exiting, thereby preserving overall model accuracy. Our approach achieves superior performance under strict parameter constraints, substantially reduces computational overhead via early exits, and can be seamlessly integrated into the fine-tuning of existing pre-trained models, improving both efficiency and adaptability.

Abstract:
Current Information Seeking (InfoSeeking) agents struggle to maintain focus and coherence during long-horizon exploration, as tracking search states, including planning procedure and massive search results, within one plain-text context is inherently fragile.To address this, we introduce Table-as-Search (TaS) , a structured planning framework that reformulates the InfoSeeking task as a Table Completion task.TaS maps each query into a structured table schema maintained in an external database, where rows represent search candidates and columns denote constraints or required information.This table precisely manages the search states: filled cells strictly record the history and search results, while empty cells serve as an explicit search plan.Crucially, TaS unifies three distinct InfoSeeking tasks: Deep Search, Wide Search, and the challenging DeepWide Search.Extensive experiments demonstrate that TaS significantly outperforms numerous state-of-the-art baselines across three kinds of benchmarks, including multi-agent framework and commercial systems.Furthermore, our analysis validates the TaS’s superior robustness in long-horizon InfoSeeking, alongside its efficiency, scalability and flexibility.Code and datasets are publicly released at https://github.com/AIDC-AI/Marco-Search-Agent .

Abstract:
Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive results on standard image-text tasks, yet their potential for visual procedure question answering (VP-QA) remains largely unexplored. VP-QA presents unique challenges where users query next-step actions by uploading images for intermediate states of complex procedures. To systematically evaluate VLMs on this practical task, we propose ProcedureVQA, a novel multimodal benchmark specifically designed for visual procedural reasoning. Through comprehensive analysis, we identify two critical limitations in current VLMs: inadequate cross-modal retrieval of structured procedures given visual states, and misalignment between image sequence granularity and textual step decomposition. To address these issues, we present Chain-of-Procedure (CoP), a hierarchical reasoning framework that first retrieves relevant instructions using visual cues, then performs step refinement through semantic decomposition, and finally generates the next step. Experiments across six VLMs demonstrate CoP’s effectiveness, achieving up to 13% absolute improvement over standard baselines.

Abstract:
Knowledge within large language models (LLMs) inevitably lags behind an evolving world, motivating knowledge editing methods that update facts without expensive retraining. In multi-hop knowledge editing, models must not only recall updated facts but also correctly propagate them through multi-step reasoning chains. However, most existing approaches rely on unidirectional, feed-forward pipelines, decomposing questions and retrieving edited facts in a rigid hop-wise sequence. This design is brittle: a minor retrieval error or logical mismatch at an early hop can become a silent failure that cascades to the final answer without an explicit recovery mechanism. To address this limitation, we propose Critic-Guided Multi-Agent Reasoning for Knowledge Editing (CARE), a framework for closed-loop post-edit reasoning. A Critic agent performs chain-level verification by checking both global coherence and step-wise correctness, and triggers bounded backtracking for iterative self-correction, while a Selector agent supplies high-fidelity, low-noise candidate pools from the edit store to enable effective revision. Experiments on MQuAKE-2002 and MQuAKE-hard demonstrate that CARE effectively mitigates error propagation, achieving a new state-of-the-art.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can recognize individuals in images and disclose sensitive personal information about them, raising critical privacy concerns. Machine unlearning aims to remove such knowledge from the model. However, existing methods rarely prescribe what the model should output in place of the forgotten content, leading to Unlearning Aftermaths: degenerate, hallucinated, or excessively refused responses. We argue that, especially for generative LVLMs, it is crucial to consider the quality and informativeness of post-unlearning responses rather than relying solely on naive suppression. To address this, we introduce a new unlearning task for LVLMs that requires models to provide privacy-preserving yet informative and visually grounded responses. We also propose PUBG, a novel unlearning method that explicitly guides post-unlearning behavior toward a desirable output distribution. Experiments show that, while existing methods suffer from Unlearning Aftermaths despite successfully preventing privacy violations, PUBG effectively mitigates these issues, generating visually grounded and informative responses without privacy leakage for forgotten targets.

Abstract:
Despite the importance of open-ended event forecasting for risk management, current LLM-based methods predominantly target only the most probable outcomes, neglecting the intrinsic uncertainty of real-world events. To bridge this gap, we advance open-ended event forecasting from pinpoint forecasting to scatter forecasting by introducing the proxy task of hypothesis generation. This paradigm aims to generate an inclusive and diverse set of hypotheses that broadly cover the space of plausible future events. To this end, we propose SCATTER, a reinforcement learning framework that jointly optimizes inclusiveness and diversity of the hypothesis. Specifically, we design a novel hybrid reward that consists of three components: 1) a validity reward that measures semantic alignment with observed events, 2) an intra-group diversity reward to encourage variation within sampled responses, and 3) an inter-group diversity reward to promote exploration across distinct modes. By integrating the validity-gated score into the overall objective, we confine the exploration of wildly diversified outcomes to contextually plausible futures, preventing the mode collapse issue. Experiments on two real-world benchmark datasets, i.e., OpenForecast and OpenEP, demonstrate that SCATTER significantly outperforms strong baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/Sambac1/SCATTER .

Abstract:
Advanced agentic intelligence is a prerequisite for deploying Large Language Models in practical, real-world applications. Diverse real-world APIs demand precise, robust function-calling intelligence, which needs agents to develop these capabilities through interaction in varied environments. The breadth of function-calling competence is closely tied to the diversity of environments in which agents are trained. In this work, we scale up environments as a step towards advancing general agentic intelligence. This gives rise to two central challenges: (i) how to scale environments in a principled manner, and (ii) how to effectively train agentic capabilities from experiences derived through interactions with these environments. To address these, we design a scalable framework that automatically constructs heterogeneous environments that are fully simulated, broadening the space of function-calling scenarios. We further adapt a two-phase agent fine-tuning strategy: first endowing agents with fundamental agentic capabilities, then specializing them for domain-specific contexts. Extensive experiments on agentic benchmarks, -bench, -Bench, and ACEBench, demonstrate that our trained model, AgentScaler, significantly enhances the models’ function-calling capability.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a powerful technique for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) with external, up-to-date knowledge. Graph RAG has emerged as an advanced paradigm that leverages graph-based knowledge structures to provide more coherent and contextually rich answers. However, the move from plain document retrieval to structured graph traversal introduces new, under-explored privacy risks. This paper investigates the data extraction vulnerabilities of the Graph RAG systems. We design and execute tailored data extraction attacks to probe their susceptibility to leaking both raw text and structured data, such as entities and their relationships. Our findings reveal a critical trade-off: while Graph RAG systems may reduce raw text leakage, they are significantly more vulnerable to the extraction of structured entity and relationship information. We also explore potential defense mechanisms to mitigate these novel attack surfaces. This work provides a foundational analysis of the unique privacy challenges in Graph RAG and offers insights for building more secure systems.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs)-based multi-agent systems have recently shown strong potential for machine translation (MT). However, their application to multi-domain translation (MDT) remains under-explored, particularly in addressing cross-domain word ambiguity. To investigate whether multi-agent approaches can help disambiguation in MDT, we propose a multi-agent collaborative disambiguation framework for MDT (MACD), which leverages the collaborative capabilities of LLMs for disambiguation. MACD consists of four cooperating agents responsible for domain allocation, general translation, domain disambiguation, and translation fusion. Experimental results show that MACD significantly improves translation performance across multiple domains and enhances disambiguation accuracy. Our approach reveals several findings on multi-agent collaboration in resolving word ambiguities.

Abstract:
Large language models require continuous adaptation to new tasks while preserving safety alignment. However, fine-tuning on even benign data often compromises safety behaviors. We investigate which training samples cause alignment drift through a data-centric lens. Our experiments show samples contribute unequally: high-gradient samples cause greater safety degradation and drive models toward pretrained distributions, while moderate-gradient samples enable task learning with minimal alignment loss. This connects to the elasticity phenomenon—high-gradient samples activate the reversion force pulling models toward pretrained behavior. We propose gradient-based sample selection that filters high-gradient samples during fine-tuning. Across multiple model families on continual domain tasks, our method substantially improves alignment preservation while maintaining competitive task performance, without requiring curated safe data or architectural modifications.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used method to fine-tune large language models, extremely reducing computational and storage costs. But its fixed-rank design cannot well capture the varying importance across different layers, limiting its flexibility. Dynamic rank allocation methods mitigate this issue by adaptively allocating ranks during training, but most of them focus solely on either rank pruning or expansion, leading to redundant parameterization or insufficient representational capacity. To address this problem, we introduce Hebbian-Guided Bi-Directional Rank Adaptation (HeBiRA), a novel framework that bi-directionally reallocates low-rank capacity using Hebbian-inspired importance estimation. HeBiRA computes the contribution of each rank direction by measuring the synergy between activations and output gradients, and adjusts the rank bi-directionally by pruning uninformative directions while expanding those in critical layers. This mechanism flexibly redistributes the rank budget during training and also can be applied to PEFT methods such as DoRA, HiRA, and QLoRA. Experiments on multiple benchmarks and theoretical analysis show that HeBiRA consistently improves performance over baselines.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) combines the language understanding and reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) with external retrieval to produce domain-grounded responses. Effectively adapting RAG systems to domain-specific settings requires specialized, context-rich training data beyond general-purpose question-answering datasets. Here, we propose RAGen, a scalable and modular data-centric framework for generating domain-grounded question–answer–context (QAC) triples tailored to diverse RAG adaptation strategies. These QAC triples serve as training signals for multiple RAG adaptation approaches; in this work, we demonstrate their use for contrastive fine-tuning of embedding models and supervised fine-tuning of LLMs under retrieved contexts. RAGen generates QAC triples by identifying key concepts within documents, producing diverse questions guided by Bloom’s Taxonomy–inspired principles, and pairing them with precise answers extracted from relevant contexts. Its modular pipeline incorporates semantic chunking, hierarchical concept extraction, multi-chunk retrieval, and curated distractor contexts to encourage robust reasoning. Designed for scalability, RAGen efficiently handles large and evolving document corpora without redundant processing, making it particularly suitable for dynamic domains like enterprise knowledge bases.

Abstract:
Modern information systems often involve different types of items, , a text query, an image, a video clip, or an audio segment. This motivates omni-modal embedding models that map heterogeneous modalities into a shared space for direct comparison. However, most recent omni-modal embeddings still rely heavily on implicit alignment inherited from pretrained vision-language model (VLM) backbones. In practice, this causes three common issues: (i) similarity logits have modality-dependent sharpness, so scores are not on a consistent scale; (ii) in-batch negatives become less effective over time because mixed-modality batches create an imbalanced hardness distribution; as a result, many negatives quickly become trivial and contribute little gradient; and (iii) embeddings across modalities show mismatched first- and second-order statistics, which makes rankings less stable. To tackle these problems, we propose e5-omni, a lightweight explicit alignment recipe that adapts off-the-shelf VLMs into robust omni-modal embedding models. e5-omni combines three simple components: (1) modality-aware temperature calibration to align similarity scales, (2) a controllable negative curriculum with debiasing to focus on confusing negatives while reducing the impact of false negatives, and (3) batch whitening with covariance regularization to better match cross-modal geometry in the shared embedding space. Experiments on MMEB-V2 and AudioCaps show consistent gains over strong bi-modal and omni-modal baselines, and the same recipe also transfers well to other VLM backbones. We release our model checkpoint at https://huggingface.co/collections/Haon-Chen/e5-omni.

Abstract:
Autoregressive decoding in Large Language Models (LLMs) generates one token per step, causing high inference latency. Speculative decoding (SD) mitigates this through a guess-and-verify strategy, but existing training-free variants face trade-offs: retrieval-based drafts break when no exact match exists, while logits-based drafts lack structural guidance. We propose RACER ( R etrieval- A ugmented C ont e xtual R apid Speculative Decoding), a lightweight and training-free method that integrates retrieved exact patterns with logit-driven future cues. This unification supplies both reliable anchors and flexible extrapolation, yielding richer speculative drafts. Experiments on Spec-Bench, HumanEval, and MGSM-ZH demonstrate that RACER consistently accelerates inference, achieving more than 2× speedup over autoregressive decoding, and outperforms prior training-free methods, offering a scalable, plug-and-play solution for efficient LLM decoding. Our source code is available at https://github.com/hkr04/RACER.

Abstract:
Despite advances in safety alignment, Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks. However, prevailing methods suffer from a dichotomy of limitations: they either rely on prohibitive iterative optimization in the input space (leading to high computational costs) or fail to penetrate the model’s internal decision-making processes. In this work, we identify a critical structural vulnerability: the ”Attention Sink” mechanism—originally designed to maintain generation stability by anchoring to initial tokens—unintentionally serves as a computational anchor for safety alignment. We hypothesize and empirically verify that safety guardrails are not globally distributed but are predominantly ”front-loaded” in specific attention heads of shallow layers. To audit this structural fragility, we propose FLASH (Focused Layer Attention Sink Hijacking), a novel diagnostic auditing framework that executes a surgical intervention. By precisely scaling attention scores in these vulnerable layers, we dismantle the model’s internal safety anchor. To ensure the attack’s robustness and coherence against the resulting internal noise, we synergize this intervention with multi-variant query rewriting and an adaptive dynamic decoding strategy. Extensive experiments on Llama-3, Qwen-3, and others demonstrate that FLASH achieves a state-of-the-art Attack Success Rate of over 77% with an unprecedented efficiency of 1.53 queries on average. This work marks a paradigm shift from brute-force optimization to mechanism-driven diagnostic auditing, exposing a fundamental trade-off between architectural stability and safety security.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement and widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) have elevated the need for reliable AI-generated content (AIGC) detection, which remains challenging as models evolve. We introduce AIGC-text-bank, a comprehensive multi-domain dataset with diverse LLM sources and authorship scenarios, and propose REVEAL, a detection framework that generates interpretable reasoning chains before classification. Our approach uses a two-stage training strategy: supervised fine-tuning to establish reasoning capabilities, followed by reinforcement learning to improve accuracy, improve logical consistency, and reduce hallucinations. Extensive experiments show that REVEAL achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks, offering a robust and transparent solution for AIGC detection. The project is open-source at https://aka.ms/reveal

Abstract:
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in Machine Translation (MT), a significant performance gap persists between high-resource and low-resource languages due to imbalanced pre-training data. In this paper, we first investigate the internal mechanisms driving this performance disparity from a layer-wise perspective.We propose a metric termed Activation Disparity ( 𝛥 R ) to quantify the activation divergence between high- and low-resource MT. Based on this metric, we distinguish between Task-Adaptive Layers (TAL, 𝛥 R > 0 ) that encode task-specific signals and Legacy-Inert Layers (LIL, 𝛥 R < 0 ) dominated by pre-trained bias. Leveraging this finding, we propose the L ayer- a ware D ual-directional M odulation ( LaDM ). Integrated with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), LaDM employs a sparse strategy to bidirectionally modulate optimization dynamics. Specifically, it amplifies contributions from TAL to accelerate feature consolidation while inhibiting LIL to dampen misaligned legacy biases. Extensive experiments on Chinese-to-seven low-resource language translation using Llama-3.1, Qwen2.5, and Gemma-2 demonstrate that LaDM significantly outperforms standard LoRA fine-tuning, achieving an average improvement of 1.73 spBLEU.Code is available at https://github.com/zzssqqq/LaDM .

Abstract:
Long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves the performance of large language models, yet hallucinations in such settings often emerge subtly and propagate across reasoning steps. We suggest that hallucination in long CoT reasoning is better understood as an evolving latent state rather than a one-off erroneous event. Accordingly, we treat step-level hallucination judgments as local observations and introduce a cumulative prefix-level hallucination signal that tracks the global evolution of the reasoning state over the entire trajectory. Overall, our approach enables streaming hallucination detection in long CoT reasoning, providing real-time, interpretable evidence.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SPD) has emerged as a promising technique to accelerate Large Language Model (LLM) inference. However, current approaches typically enforce a uniform verification standard, neglecting the inherent heterogeneity of natural language and failing to distinguish between semantically-rich content and structurally-predictable syntax. In this paper, we propose LinguaSpec, a training-free framework that leverages linguistic priors to enable adaptive drafting and verification. Specifically, we introduce: (1) a Static Linguistic Probe (SLP) to categorize tokens with zero latency; (2) Syntactic Normalized Surprisal (SNS) to calibrate uncertainty against category-specific entropy; and (3) a dual strategy of Syntactically-Guided Elastic Expansion and POS-Adaptive Deferred Verification to dynamically adjust drafting depth and verification rigor. By balancing semantic integrity with structural efficiency, LinguaSpec significantly accelerates inference without requiring additional training. Experimental results demonstrate its superior performance across diverse benchmarks.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the factual accuracy of Large Language Model (LLM) outputs based on external knowledge bases. These knowledge bases often carry significant intellectual property (IP) value, raising the urgent need for robust watermarking techniques to protect IP. However, existing RAG watermarking methods remain in their infancy, facing challenges such as limited encoding capacity and potential degradation of RAG performance or knowledge quality. In this paper, we propose knowledge-infused and multi-bit watermarking (KMW) for RAG knowledge bases. It generates watermark text to infuse the knowledge base by benign knowledge completion and a tailored generative watermarking algorithm. Each generated text can carry a multi-bit watermark segment. For effective detection, we design a Watermark Text Indexer that optimizes queries for steady retrieval of watermarked texts. Experiments on multiple datasets and LLMs show KMW reliably extracts watermarks from adversarial RAGs. It is robust against knowledge selection, alteration, expansion, and RAG setting restrictions, while remaining stealthy and secure. This highlights that KMW ensures effective IP protection for RAG systems. Our code is available here https://github.com/iieSKLCSDsg/KMW.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently shown remarkable ability to enhance reasoning in large language models (LLMs), yet its potential in scientific domains beyond mathematics remains largely unexplored. Geoscience questions couple broad factual knowledge with multi-step inference and often rely on visual evidence such as maps, cross-sections, and diagrams, making them a challenging but verifiable testbed for RL-based reasoning. To enable this study, we introduce GeoMC-10K, a dataset of 10,000 geoscience multiple-choice questions spanning physical to human geography and high-school to professional levels; over 30% of the questions are image dependent. To support text-only RL on these multimodal questions, we design GeoM2T, a multi-agent framework that converts multimodal questions into descriptive text while preserving answerability and difficulty. Fine-tuning LLaMA-3.1-8B and Qwen-3-8B with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), incorporating a factual reward mechanism, yields GR1, which achieves absolute accuracy improvements of 5.9% and 13.3%, respectively, and it generalizes to out-of-distribution geoscience benchmarks. Together, GeoMC-10K, GeoM2T, and GR1 establish a scalable benchmark and baseline for RL-enhanced geoscience reasoning.

Abstract:
Millions of users turn to AI models for their information needs. It is conceivable that a large number of user queries contain assumptions that may be factually inaccurate. Prior work notes that large language models (LLMs) often fail to challenge such erroneous assumptions, and can reinforce users’ misinformed opinions. However, given the recent advances, especially in model’s reasoning capabilities, we revisit whether large reasoning models (LRMs) can reason about the underlying assumptions and respond to user queries appropriately. We construct queries with varying degrees of presuppositions spanning health, science, and general knowledge, and use it to evaluate several widely-deployed models When compared to non-reasoning models, we find that reasoning models achieve a slightly higher accuracy (2-11%), but they still fail to challenge a large fraction (26-42%) of false presuppositions. Further, reasoning models remain susceptible to how strongly the presupposition is expressed.

Abstract:
Agentic workflows, composed of multiple collaborating Large Language Models (LLMs), have become a key paradigm for complex problem-solving. However, their effectiveness is often hindered by three critical challenges: high manual design costs, inefficient agentic search, and poor dynamic adaptability to new tasks and human preferences. To address these limitations, we propose HFlow, an evolutionary framework for generating agentic workflows through human-agent collaboration. HFlow employs an evolutionary algorithm to automate the search for optimal workflows by mutating and crossing over their structures, prompts, and LLM backbones. This process is guided by human preferences to ensure rapid convergence, while a hierarchical experience memory enables the generalization of learned strategies. Extensive experiments on math and code generation benchmarks show HFlow surpasses other automated baselines by up to 27.34%, while achieving comparable performance to o1-preview at only one-fourth of the cost. Our work introduces a new paradigm for workflow design that produces cost-effective and adaptive solutions, better aligning automated agentic systems with dynamic human needs.

Abstract:
As reinforcement learning continues to scale the training of large language model–based agents, reliably verifying agent behaviors in complex environments has become increasingly challenging. Existing approaches rely on rule-based verifiers or LLM-as-a-Judge models, which struggle to generalize beyond narrow domains. Agent-as-a-Judge addresses this limitation by actively interacting with environments and tools to acquire verifiable evidence, yet its capabilities remain underexplored.We introduce a benchmark AJ-Bench to systematically evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge across three domains—search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces—comprising 155 tasks and 516 annotated trajectories. The benchmark comprehensively assesses judge agents’ abilities in information acquisition, state verification, and process verification. Experiments demonstrate consistent performance gains over LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, while also revealing substantial open challenges in agent-based verification. Our data and code are available at https://aj-bench.github.io/.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to optimization-based jailbreak attacks that exploit internal gradient structure. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) are widely used for interpretability, their robustness implications remain underexplored. We present a study of integrating pretrained SAEs into transformer residual streams at inference time, without modifying model weights or blocking gradients. Across four model families (Gemma, LLaMA, Mistral, Qwen) and two strong white-box attacks (GCG, BEAST) plus three black-box benchmarks, SAE-augmented models achieve up to a 5x reduction in jailbreak success rate relative to the undefended baseline and reduce cross-model attack transferability. Parametric ablations reveal (i) a monotonic dose-response relationship between L0 sparsity and attack success rate, and (ii) a layer-dependent defense-utility tradeoff, where intermediate layers balance robustness and clean performance. These findings are consistent with a representational bottleneck hypothesis: sparse projection reshapes the optimization geometry exploited by jailbreak attacks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning optimization policies have traditionally relied on a single reward mechanism, most commonly a model-based reward. Such monolithic rewards often lack confidence calibration across domain-specific tasks and fail to capture diverse aspects of model responses. This approach requires extensive data annotation and reward model training, which is particularly challenging for multimodal models. In this work, we propose and provide a thorough study of hybrid reward and multi-aspect reward modeling. For accuracy and confidence calibration, we introduce a hybrid reward modeling framework that integrates complementary reward paradigms: model-based rewards, in which a learned reward model predicts scalar or vector scores, and rule-based reward, in which domain-specific heuristics provide explicit correctness signals with confidence. Beyond accuracy, we further incorporate multi-aspect rewards to enforce instruction adherence and introduce a generalized length-penalty reward to stabilize training and improve performance. Experiments demonstrate that this approach significantly enhances reasoning capabilities: our best-performing 3B model achieves an average improvement of ~9.5% across multimodal benchmarks, with a notable ~16% gain in mathematical reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong reasoning performance by allocating substantial computation at inference time, often generating long and verbose reasoning traces. While recent work on efficient reasoning reduces this overhead through length-based rewards or pruning, many approaches are post-trained under a much shorter context window than base-model training, a factor whose effect has not been systematically isolated. We first show that short-context post-training alone, using standard GRPO without any length-aware objective, already induces substantial reasoning compression—but at the cost of increasingly unstable training dynamics and accuracy degradation. To address this, we propose Step-level Advantage Selection (SAS), which operates at the reasoning-step level and assigns a zero advantage to low-confidence steps in correct rollouts and to high-confidence steps in verifier-failed rollouts, where failures often arise from truncation or verifier issues rather than incorrect reasoning. Across diverse mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks, SAS reduces average reasoning length by over 30% while improving Pass@1 accuracy by 3.79 points over the strongest length-aware baseline, yielding a better accuracy–efficiency trade-off.

Abstract:
Inference-time scaling through multiple sample generation in combination with Process- or Outcome-Reward Model (PRM or ORM) re-ranking has proven effective for text-based reasoning in large language models. This paper investigates whether such established techniques can be successfully adapted to reasoning in the continuous space, using COCONUT (CITATION) continuous space reasoning LM as the backbone. We demonstrate the feasibility of generating diverse reasoning paths through dropout-based sampling. Our Pass@N analysis on the generated samples reveals the potential that could enable a significant gain in performance akin to gains observed in the discrete space. However, we highlight unique challenges faced for materializing this gain in the continuous thought space. In particular, working recipes for data generation and training PRM and ORM models in the discrete space unlocks only marginal improvements in the continuous space. Through probing various aspects including geometric properties and trajectory dynamics, we identify the underlying reasons that prevent effective discrimination between correct and incorrect reasoning (essential for the functioning of PRM and ORM). Our findings reveal that current limitations stem from the absence of key inductive biases in continuous thought representations.

Abstract:
Tables present unique challenges for language models due to their structured row-column interactions, necessitating specialized approaches for effective comprehension. While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in table reasoning through prompting and techniques like chain-of-thought (CoT) and program-of-thought (PoT), optimizing their performance for table question answering remains underexplored. In this paper, we introduce region-based Table-R1, a novel reinforcement learning approach that enhances LLM table understanding by integrating region evidence into reasoning steps. Our method employs Region-Enhanced Supervised Fine-Tuning (RE-SFT) to guide models in identifying relevant table regions before generating answers, incorporating textual, symbolic, and program-based reasoning. Additionally, Table-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (TARPO) introduces a mixed reward system to dynamically balance region accuracy and answer correctness, with decaying region rewards and consistency penalties to align reasoning steps. Experiments show that Table-R1 achieves an average performance improvement of 14.36 points across multiple base models on three benchmark datasets, even outperforming baseline models with ten times the number of parameters, while TARPO significantly reduces the reasoning token consumption by 67.5% compared to GRPO, significantly advancing LLM capabilities in efficient tabular reasoning.

Abstract:
Empowering machines to understand scientific literature is crucial for accelerating scientific discovery and advancing the AI for Science (AI4S) paradigm. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of datasets serving this domain. We propose a systematic taxonomy that organizes resources spanning structural understanding, text understanding, multimodal understanding and pre-training/instruction fine-tuning. Beyond a structured overview, we discuss the evolution of the field, elucidating how the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has reshaped research priorities of dataset construction. By synthesizing existing datasets and identifying critical future directions, this work provides a roadmap for advancing intelligent scientific research systems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in agentic collaborative problem-solving, albeit a gap exists. Existing frameworks predominantly rely on natural language as a primary representation (format) for agentic communication. However natural language could be ambiguous and verbose. Furthermore, recent works have shown that alternative representations can enhance performance in LLMs on certain tasks. But current approaches lack the intelligence necessary to understand, learn or apply optimal communication representations adaptively. In this paper, we propose to dynamically learn the optimal message representations to enhance agentic performance. We model the optimization problem as an Expanding Markov Decision Process (EMDP) and propose our method named OPTiMACS. We evaluate our system across benchmark datasets of collaborative problem-solving. The results show significant performance improvements while maintaining efficiency. Our work bridges the gap between rigid communication protocols and open-ended natural language by providing an adaptive framework that learns task-aware structural representations.

Abstract:
Pluralism alignment with AI has the sophisticated and necessary goal of creating AI that can coexist with and serve morally multifaceted humanity. Research towards pluralism alignment has many efforts in enhancing the learning of large language models (LLMs) to accomplish pluralism. Although this is essential, the robustness of LLMs to produce moral content over pluralistic values is still under exploration. Inspired by the astonishing persuasion abilities via jailbreak prompts, we propose to leverage jailbreak attacks to study LLMs’ internal pluralistic values. In detail, we develop a morality dataset with 10.4K instances in two categories: Value Ambiguity and Value Conflict. We further formalize four adversarial attacks with the constructed dataset, to manipulate LLMs’ judgment over the morality questions. We evaluate both the large language models and guardrail models which are typically used in generative systems with flexible user input. Our experiment results show that there is a critical vulnerability of LLMs and guardrail models to these subtle and sophisticated moral-aware attacks.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled web agents to perform interactive tasks on real-world websites. However, existing agents still suffer from limited robustness, efficiency, and task success, largely due to their lack of structural understanding of websites and the absence of browsing priors in pre-trained models. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the Web Agent Sitemap Protocol (WASP), an agent-oriented sitemap that integrate structured website knowledge into web agents. WASP adopts a dual-granularity design, providing global site-level structure and local page-level semantic and interaction guidance. We also introduce a framework LightASM for constructing such sitemaps by identifying core pages and generating concise semantic summaries and block-level descriptions. Experiments on real-world browsing benchmarks demonstrate that WASP substantially improves the robustness, efficiency, and effectiveness of LLM-based web agents without extra training.

Abstract:
Large Language Models demonstrate outstanding performance in many language tasks but still face fundamental challenges in managing the non-linear flow of human conversation. The prevalent approach of treating dialogue history as a flat, linear sequence is misaligned with the intrinsically hierarchical and branching structure of natural discourse, leading to inefficient context utilization and a loss of coherence during extended interactions involving topic shifts or instruction refinements. To address this limitation, we introduce Context-Agent, a novel framework that models multi-turn dialogue history as a dynamic tree structure. This approach mirrors the inherent non-linearity of conversation, enabling the model to maintain and navigate multiple dialogue branches corresponding to different topics. Furthermore, to facilitate robust evaluation, we introduce the Non-linear Task Multi-turn Dialogue (NTM) benchmark, specifically designed to assess model performance in long-horizon, non-linear scenarios. Our experiments demonstrate that Context-Agent enhances task completion rates and improves token efficiency across various LLMs, underscoring the value of structured context management for complex, dynamic dialogues. The dataset and code is available at GitHub.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation systems often suffer from a gap between optimizing retrieval relevance and generative utility. With such a gap, retrieved documents may be topically relevant but still lack the content needed for effective reasoning during generation. While existing bridge modules attempt to rewrite the retrieved text for better generation, we show how they fail by not capturing "document utility". In this work, we propose R2U, with a key distinction of approximating true utility through joint observation of rewriting and answering in the reasoning process. To distill this observation reliably, R2U scales such supervision to enhance reliability in distillation. We further construct utility-improvement supervision by measuring the generator’s gain of the answer under the rewritten context, yielding signals for fine-tuning and preference optimization. We evaluate our method across multiple open-domain question-answering benchmarks. The empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements over strong bridging baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly released as open-weight models with safeguards against harmful requests. Nevertheless, sentence completion remains vulnerable to incomplete harmful prompts. In this work, we formalize this phenomenon as incomplete prompt jailbreaks (IPJ) and provide a systematic empirical characterization of when and how incomplete prompts elicit harmful continuations. We analyze diverse attractor types associated with incomplete sentence continuation and show that LLMs systematically delay refusal until sentence termination. We further demonstrate that training models to refuse incomplete harmful prompts via parameter tuning is insufficient, failing to generalize across both content domains and attractor types. To enable fine-grained control, we identify two functional neurons: termination and continuation neurons. By clarifying their roles in sentence completion, we highlight the potential of neuron-level interventions for more precise and robust IPJ defenses.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to mitigate hallucinations typically relies on high-quality preference data. However, in self-supervised settings, standard binary preference optimization (e.g., DPO) suffers from noisy supervision and semantic ambiguity, as automatically generated chosen responses are not guaranteed to be superior to rejected ones. In this work, we propose Trident , a fully self-supervised framework that ensures robust alignment via a structured triplet paradigm. Trident autonomously constructs reliable preference triplets—comprising semantically enriched (chosen), degraded (rejected), and neutral (anchor) responses—through automated visual perturbations and self-summarization. We further introduce Trident Preference Regularization (TPR), a novel objective that utilizes an adaptive margin to enforce semantic separation between the triplet components while preventing deviation from the pretrained distribution. Despite requiring no human annotations or external reward models, Trident consistently outperforms state-of-the-art RLHF and RLAIF baselines. For instance, on LLaVA-1.5-7B, it reduces the hallucination rate on AMBER to 11.3% and achieves 95.70% precision on POPE using only 4k self-generated triplets and a single epoch. This validates structured triplet supervision as a scalable paradigm for robust self-supervised alignment.

Abstract:
Accurate and interpretable predictions of depression severity are essential for clinical decision support, yet existing models often lack uncertainty estimates and temporal interpretability. We propose PTTSD, a Probabilistic framework for Depression Detection from clinical interview utterance sequences that predicts PHQ-8 scores while modeling calibrated uncertainty. PTTSD includes sequence-to-sequence and sequence-to-one variants, both combining LSTMs, self-attention, and residual connections with Gaussian or Student’s-t output heads trained via negative log-likelihood. The sequence-to-sequence variant enables temporal analysis of how predictive confidence evolves over an interview, despite the target being a single session-level score. Evaluated on E-DAIC and DAIC-WOZ, PTTSD achieves competitive performance among text-only systems (e.g., MAE = 3.85 on E-DAIC, 3.55 on DAIC) and produces well-calibrated prediction intervals. Ablations confirm the value of attention and probabilistic modeling, while a three-part calibration analysis and qualitative case studies highlight the clinical relevance of uncertainty-aware prediction.

Abstract:
Retrieval Augmented Generation faces a trade-off: concatenating documents in a long prompt enables multi-document reasoning but creates prefill bottlenecks, while encoding document KV caches separately offers speed but breaks cross-document interaction. We propose Parallel Context-of-Experts Decoding (PCED), a training-free framework that shifts evidence aggregation from the attention mechanism to the decoding. PCED treats retrieved documents as isolated "experts", synchronizing their predictions via a retrieval-aware extension of context-aware decoding. This approach recovers cross-document reasoning capabilities without constructing a shared attention across documents.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) enable simulating individual responses from persona information, supporting applications such as opinion elicitation and virtual character creation. However, existing approaches typically assume rich persona profiles, which are often unavailable in practice. In this work, motivated by recent findings that LLMs can identify query-relevant persona dimensions (e.g., whether a user is price-sensitive), we study query-focused individual simulation under cold-start settings, where relevant persona information is identified and requested on demand for each query. To solve this task while minimizing the number of persona requests, we explore a progressive method that iteratively predicts the most critical relevant persona dimension and uses self-reported confidence as a stopping signal to determine when sufficient information has been collected. Experiments on two dialogue datasets show that this query-driven paradigm achieves simulation performance comparable to approaches that rely on rich persona information extracted from dialogue history, using only a few persona dimensions (up to five per query), and this number is further reduced by our progressive method while maintaining or improving simulation quality.

Abstract:
Existing hate speech detection models are often opaque and rely on surface-level lexical cues, which makes them vulnerable to spurious correlations and limits robustness, interpretability and cultural contextualization. We propose Supervised Moral Rationale Attention (SMRA), the first self-explaining hate speech detection framework to incorporate moral rationales as direct supervision for attention alignment. Based on Moral Foundations Theory, SMRA aligns token-level attention with expert-annotated moral rationales, guiding models to attend to morally salient spans. Unlike prior rationale-supervised or post-hoc approaches, SMRA integrates moral rationale supervision directly into the training objective, producing inherently interpretable and contextualized explanations. To support our framework, we also introduce HateBRMoralXplain, a Brazilian Portuguese benchmark dataset annotated with hate labels, moral categories, token-level moral rationales, and socio-political metadata. Across binary hate speech detection and multi-label moral sentiment classification, SMRA consistently improves performance while enhancing both faithful and plausible explanations. Although explanations become more concise, sufficiency decreases, indicating more compact and informative rationales. Fairness remains stable, suggesting that improvements in explanation quality do not introduce significant bias trade-offs.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to human preferences is crucial for improving their real-world behavior. A common approach is to use reward models that enable reinforcement-learning post-training. However, traditional reward modeling requires finetuning on large preference datasets, limiting adaptability to new preferences. We introduce Activation Reward Models (Activation RMs)—the first mechanistic interpretability approach that steers LLM activations to align with few-shot preference data without finetuning. Our method combines activation denoising and output token likelihood scoring, achieving state-of-the-art performance on standard reward modeling benchmarks, surpassing zero-shot, few-shot, and voting-based baselines. We further demonstrate that Activation RMs mitigate reward hacking behaviors and remain robust to noisy exemplars and spurious reward signals. To evaluate this, we propose PreferenceHack, a novel few-shot benchmark testing reward models on reward hacking in a paired preference format, where Activation RMs achieve state-of-the-art performance, surpassing GPT-4o.

Abstract:
We annotate PubMed Central paragraphs for document type, domain, and educational quality using a two-stage pipeline: Llama-3.1-70B labels 400K paragraphs, then a fine-tuned XLM-RoBERTa propagates annotations to the full corpus. This paragraph-level approach captures content diversity within scientific articles that document-level labels miss. The resulting Biomed-Enriched corpus contains 2M clinical case paragraphs, providing a publicly available alternative to restricted clinical datasets. For decoders, continual pretraining experiments enable targeted improvements, with clinical upsampling boosting performance by 4 points on MMLU ProfMed and educational filtering improving MedQA and MedMCQA by ~1 point. Combinations of these techniques led to faster convergence, reaching the same performance with a third of training tokens. For encoders, our best recipe matches BioClinical-ModernBERT on 11 tasks (77.3% vs 77.1% F1) while using 2.5x fewer tokens and only public data.

Abstract:
Multi-lingual competence in large language models is often evaluated via static data benchmarks such as Belebele, M-MMLU and M-GSM. However, these evaluations often fail to provide an adequate understanding of the practical performance and robustness of models across multi-lingual settings. In response, we create multi-lingual functional benchmarks – Cross-Lingual Grade School Math Symbolic (CL-GSM Symbolic) and Cross-Lingual Instruction-Following Eval (CL-IFEval)– by translating existing functional benchmark templates from English to five additional languages that span the range of resources available for NLP: French, Spanish, Hindi, Arabic and Yoruba. Our results show that the gap between static and functional evaluations is highly uneven: across models, performance drops from M-GSM to CL-GSM Symbolic by 24%, 17%, and 18% in English, French, and Spanish, while the drop from Belebele to CL-IFEval ranges from 15% to 24% across languages, and the drop from M-MMLU to CL-IFEval is much smaller (0.5% to 3%).Similarly, we find that model robustness across languages varies significantly, with certain languages (eg. Arabic, English) being the most consistently well performing across evaluation iterations.

Abstract:
Semantic segmentation is a core component of discourse analysis, yet existing models are primarily developed and evaluated on high-resource written text, limiting their effectiveness on low-resource conversational varieties. In particular, dialectal Arabic exhibits informal syntax, code-switching, and weakly marked discourse structure that challenge standard semantic segmentation approaches for text. In this paper, we introduce a new multi-genre benchmark (more than 1000 samples) for semantic segmentation in Arabic, focusing on dialectal discourse. The benchmark covers casual telephone conversations, code-switched podcasts, expressive dialogue, and broadcast news, and was annotated and validated by native Arabic annotators. Using this benchmark, we show that segmentation models performing well on MSA news genres degrade on dialectal conversational texts. We further propose a segmentation model that targets local semantic coherence and robustness to discourse discontinuities, consistently outperforming strong baselines on dialectal non-news genres. The benchmark and approach generalize to other low-resource spoken languages.

Abstract:
Recent advances in summarization research focus on improving summary quality across multiple criteria, such as completeness, conciseness, and faithfulness, by jointly optimizing these dimensions. However, these efforts largely overlook the challenge of controlling summary generation with respect to individual criteria, especially in the presence of their inherent trade-offs. For example, enhancing conciseness can compromise completeness, and vice versa. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a loss function that aligns model outputs with fine-grained, model-based evaluation scores (e.g., from FineSurE), enabling both improvement in summary quality and dimension-specific control. Our approach improves the overall quality of summaries while maintaining the ability to selectively prioritize one criterion over others. Experiments on three pretrained models (LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral) demonstrate that our method achieves performance comparable to state-of-the-art summarizers, while uniquely offering strong controllability over individual quality dimensions.

Abstract:
Recent automated transcription systems have focused on end-to-end orthographic approaches driven by deep neural networks and sequence-to-sequence transformers. Growing public interest in transcription at the phonemic or phonetic level has led to re-purposing these systems to segment and identify phones, the basic sounds which comprise human speech. However, they miss the mark on a fundamental component of time-series analysis, namely time. For linguistic applications which require high fidelity in the temporal domain, the loss of timing information is untenable. Our work proposes a deadline-bounded expectation maximization (EM) algorithm with a novel initialization method to estimate formants, i.e., salient speech frequencies, for enhanced phonetic segmentation. Based on the concept of spectral gravity, i.e., treating spectral energy as mass attenuated by the square of frequency distance across the spectrum, our technique outperforms the recent state of the art on key clustering metrics, generating reasonable alignments across multiple languages with no a priori training.

Abstract:
Recent large vision–language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong potential for device control. However, existing research has primarily focused on point-and-click (PnC) interaction, while remote-control (RC) interaction commonly encountered in everyday TV usage remains largely underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce TVWorld, an offline graph-based abstraction of real-world TV navigation that enables reproducible and deployment-free evaluation. On this basis, we derive two complementary benchmarks that comprehensively assess TV-use capabilities: TVWorld-N for topology-aware navigation and TVWorld-G for focus-aware grounding. These benchmarks expose a key limitation of existing agents: insufficient topology awareness for focus-based, long-horizon TV navigation. Motivated by this finding, we propose a Topology-Aware Training framework that injects topology awareness into LVLMs. Using this framework, we develop TVTheseus, a foundation model specialized for TV navigation. TVTheseus achieves a success rate of 68.3 on TVWorld-N, surpassing strong closed-source baselines such as Gemini 3 Flash and establishing state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. Additional analyses further provide valuable insights into the development of effective TV-use agents.

Abstract:
Sports have witnessed growing global enthusiasm in recent years, serving as a vital force for physical health, cultural exchange, social connection, and economic growth. The rapid advancement of large models, particularly (multimodal) large language models (M)LLMs, has demonstrated transformative potential to reshape sports understanding, analysis, and interaction across diverse domains. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of large models in sports, including (i) an overview of tasks and applications across different participant groups; (ii) a detailed analysis of sports-related datasets and benchmarks; and (iii) a critical discussion of current challenges and future directions. Our goal is to establish a foundation for advancing research and practical development of large-model-driven sports intelligence. An open-source GitHub repository is maintained at: https://github.com/Road2Redemption/Awesome_Large_Models_In_Sports1.

Abstract:
Model merging is an effective technique for composing the capabilities of a multilingual model and a reasoning model. It has achieved promising generalization in multilingual reasoning tasks by aligning feature spaces of different models. However, the merged single model often fails to address the conflicts between source models, leading to suboptimal performance. In other words, the one-size-fits-all merging strategy may not align with the characteristics of different inputs which may require prioritizing certain models over others. To this end, we propose a Steerable Model Merging (ST-Merge) framework to modulate the contribution of each source model. To realize this idea, we introduce a gated cross-attention mechanism to weight or filter the two attended source models in an adaptive manner. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ST-Merge consistently outperforms multiple strong baselines on four multilingual reasoning benchmarks across 21 different languages.

Abstract:
Flow-matching generative models have created significant milestones in text-to-audio generation, powered by scalable training with increased data, computational resources, and model size, while their scalable inference remains less explored. In this work, we propose MaskAudioFlow, a continuous flow-matching transformer with masked generative modeling designed for scaling text-to-audio inference-time prediction. Specifically, MaskAudioFlow 1) masks spans of audio frames in training and approximates the continuous velocity vector field with flow-matching objective, and 2) performs inference via masked prediction, where we mask out generation and re-predict them through iterative decoding. To reduce the gap between generation and human preferences, we fine-tune MaskAudioFlow using reward signals from text-audio correspondence and perceptual aesthetics. Experimental results demonstrate that MaskAudioFlow achieves state-of-the-art performance in text-to-audio generation, effectively scaling inference-time computation through iterative masked prediction. Moreover, the preference-tuned model demonstrates superior text-audio alignment faithfulness and enhanced perceptual aesthetics. Audio samples are available at https://MaskAudio.github.io

Abstract:
Explainability has become a crucial concern in today’s world, aiming to enhance transparency in machine learning and deep learning models. Information retrieval is no exception to this trend. In existing literature on explainability of information retrieval, the emphasis has predominantly been on illustrating the concept of relevance concerning a retrieval model. The questions addressed include why a document is relevant to a query, why one document exhibits higher relevance than another, or why a specific set of documents is deemed relevant for a query. However, limited attention has been given to understanding why a particular document is not favored (e.g., not within top-K) with respect to a query and a retrieval model. In an effort to address this gap, our work focuses on the question of what terms need to be added within a document to improve its ranking. This, in turn, answers the question of which words in the document played a role in not being favored by a retrieval model for a particular query. We use a counterfactual framework to solve the above-mentioned research problem. Our experiments show the effectiveness of our proposed approach in predicting counterfactuals for both statistical (e.g. BM25) and deep-learning-based models (e.g. DRMM, DSSM, ColBERT, MonoT5).

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it often incurs substantial computational costs due to “over-reasoning”—the generation of redundant, verbose, or irrelevant steps. While existing reasoning step evaluators effectively detect logical fallacies and factual errors, our analysis reveals a critical blind spot: they fail to penalize “valid but inefficient” reasoning steps that inflate token usage without contributing to the solution. To systematically diagnose this limitation, we introduce RIV-GSM8K, a diagnostic benchmark injected with five distinct types of inefficiencies, including circular reasoning and excessive decomposition. Diagnostic experiments reveal that state-of-the-art evaluators struggle to distinguish these inefficiencies from necessary reasoning. To address this gap, we propose CAID (Context-Aware Information Density), a training-free metric grounded in information theory that identifies low-utility steps. To validate the metric’s practical utility, we apply it within PACE, a post-hoc compression strategy. Additional control experiments show that the gains of PACE are not explained by trivial pruning: compared with random step removal and PRM-based compression baselines, it preserves accuracy at substantially higher compression rates. Empirical results on GSM8K, StrategyQA, and ARC-Challenge demonstrate that PACE reduces token consumption by 31–53% while maintaining accuracy, confirming that CAID successfully distills informational “froth” from reasoning chains without compromising deductive validity.

Abstract:
As large language model agents tackle increasingly complex long-horizon tasks, effective post-training becomes critical. Prior work faces fundamental challenges: outcome-only rewards fail to precisely attribute credit to intermediate steps, estimated step-level rewards introduce systematic noise, and Monte Carlo sampling approaches for step reward estimation incur prohibitive computational cost. Inspired by findings that only a small fraction of high-entropy tokens drive effective RL for reasoning, we propose Critical Step Optimization (CSO), which focuses preference learning on verified critical steps—decision points where alternate actions demonstrably flip task outcomes from failure to success. Crucially, our method starts from failed policy trajectories rather than expert demonstrations, directly targeting the policy model’s weaknesses. We use a process reward model (PRM) to identify candidate critical steps, leverage expert models to propose high-quality alternatives, then continue execution from these alternatives using the policy model itself until task completion. Only alternatives that the policy successfully executes to correct outcomes are verified and used as DPO training data, ensuring both quality and policy reachability. This yields fine-grained, verifiable supervision at critical decisions while avoiding trajectory-level coarseness and step-level noise. Experiments on GAIA-Text-103 and XBench-DeepSearch show that CSO achieves 37% and 26% relative improvement over the SFT baseline and substantially outperforms other post-training methods, while requiring supervision at only 16% of trajectory steps. This demonstrates the effectiveness of selective verification-based learning for agent post-training.

Abstract:
LLMs are increasingly being integrated into clinical workflows, yet they often lack clinical empathy, an essential aspect of effective doctor–patient communication. Existing NLP frameworks focus on reactively labeling empathy in doctors’ responses but offer limited support for anticipatory modeling of empathy needs, especially in general health queries. We introduce the Empathy Applicability Framework (EAF), a theory-driven approach that classifies patient queries in terms of the applicability of emotional reactions and interpretations, based on clinical, contextual, and linguistic cues. We release a benchmark of real patient queries, dual-annotated by human annotators and GPT-4o. In the subset with human consensus, we also observe substantial human–GPT alignment. To validate EAF, we train classifiers on human-labeled and GPT-only annotations to predict empathy applicability, achieving strong performance and outperforming the heuristic and zero-shot LLM baselines. Error analysis highlights persistent challenges: implicit distress, clinical-severity ambiguity, and contextual hardship, underscoring the need for multi-annotator modeling, clinician-in-the-loop calibration, and culturally diverse annotation. EAF provides a framework for identifying empathy needs before response generation, establishes a benchmark for anticipatory empathy modeling, and enables supporting empathetic communication in asynchronous healthcare.

Abstract:
Radiology report generation requires precise alignment between medical imaging findings and clinically coherent textual descriptions. While current methods predominantly rely on either large vision-language models (LVLMs) for visual grounding or large language models (LLMs) for medical narrative generation, they often fail to effectively integrate multimodal clinical evidence with domain-specific knowledge. This paper proposes a novel multimodal dual-path framework that synergistically combines LVLMs and LLMs to address these limitations. Our approach establishes a dynamic fusion between LVLMs’ visual-semantic grounding capabilities and LLMs’ clinical knowledge reasoning. Specifically, we employ a structured prompting strategy that models the report generation task into three clinically meaningful sections and introduces fine-grained multi-label classification prompts to guide the models, enabling more accurate and comprehensive clinical report generation. Experiments on the public MIMIC-CXR benchmark demonstrate our framework’s superiority over state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
LLM agents with tool-calling capabilities often fail when user instructions are ambiguous or incomplete, leading to incorrect invocations and task failures. Existing approaches operate in unstructured language spaces, generating clarifying questions through prompting strategies that lack principled criteria for determining which questions to ask and when to stop. We introduce a principled formulation of structured uncertainty that operates directly over tool parameters and their domains, cleanly separating specification uncertainty (what the user wants) from model uncertainty (what the LLM predicts). Our formulation uses Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) to quantify the disambiguation value of each potential question, balanced against aspect-based cost modeling that prevents redundant questioning. We demonstrate the versatility of this formulation through two applications. First, SAGE-Agent uses structured uncertainty for inference-time question selection, achieving 7–39% higher coverage on ambiguous tasks while reducing clarification questions by 1.5–2.7 x compared to strong prompting and uncertainty-based baselines. Second, we show that structured uncertainty provides effective training signals: uncertainty-guided reward modeling boosts When2Call accuracy from 36.5% to 65.2% (3B model) and 36.7% to 62.9% (7B model) through uncertainty-weighted GRPO training, demonstrating more sample-efficient reinforcement learning for tool-calling agents. To enable evaluation, we present ClarifyBench , the first multi-turn dynamic tool-calling disambiguation benchmark. Our results establish structured uncertainty as a principled framework that improves both inference-time interaction efficiency and training-time sample efficiency in tool-augmented agents.

Abstract:
Machine unlearning aims to remove “forget” data while preserving knowledge from the “retain” data, yet a fundamental question arises when the two share content. By definition, an unlearned model should be indistinguishable from a model retrained solely on the retain set, which implies that shared knowledge must remain while only forget-specific content is removed. To evaluate this requirement, we introduce DUSK, the first benchmark for unlearning under realistic knowledge overlap. DUSK constructs documents containing both shared and unique knowledge and defines seven metrics to test whether methods erase forget-specific expressions without discarding shared facts. Evaluating nine recent approaches, we find that although surface text is often removed, current methods struggle to distinguish shared from unique knowledge, either erasing information that should be retained or failing to fully forget target content. DUSK provides a controlled, reproducible testbed for diagnosing these failures and guiding precise unlearning algorithms.

Abstract:
Experience-driven self-evolution has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving the autonomy of large language model agents, yet its reliance on self-curated experience introduces underexplored safety risks. In this study, we investigate how experience accumulation and utilization in self-evolving agents affect safety performance across web-based and embodied environments. Notably, experience gathered solely from benign tasks can still compromise safety in high-risk scenarios. Further analysis attributes this degradation to the execution-oriented nature of accumulated experience, which reinforces agents’ tendency to act rather than refuse. In more realistic settings where agents encounter both benign and harmful tasks, refusal-related experience mitigates safety decline but induces over-refusal, revealing a fundamental safety–utility trade-off. Overall, our findings expose inherent limitations of current self-evolving agents and call for more principled strategies to ensure safe and reliable adaptation.

Abstract:
Recent work has demonstrated the potential of large language models (LLMs) for program optimization, a key challenge in programming languages. We propose a blackbox adaptation method called Retrieval Augmented Search (RAS) that performs beam search over candidate optimizations; at each step, it retrieves in-context examples from a given training dataset of slow-fast program pairs to guide the LLM. Critically, we find that performing contextual retrieval based on an LLM-generated natural language description significantly outperforms retrieval based on the source code. We also propose AEGIS, a method for improving interpretability by decomposing training examples into "atomic edits” that are significantly more incremental in nature. We show that RAS performs up to 2.06 × better than prior state-of-the-art blackbox adaptation strategies on optimizing C++ programs, and that AEGIS performs up to 1.37 × better while making significantly smaller edits. We also show that using RAS improves the mean runtime percentile of Python programs by 10.27 compared to baselines.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation (KD) is a widely adopted technique for transferring capabilities from large language models to smaller student models. However, conventional supervised KD often suffers from a distribution mismatch between training and inference. While on-policy KD approaches attempt to mitigate this issue by learning directly from student-generated outputs, they frequently encounter training instabilities and noisy teacher feedback during early optimization stages. These challenges manifest as pathological gradients in forward KL objectives when students encounter unfamiliar tokens, or as a collapse in distributional diversity within reverse KL regimes. To address these limitations, we propose Veto, an objective-level reformulation that constructs a geometric target distribution in logit space to emphasize agreement between the teacher and the student. By introducing a tunable parameter 𝛽 , Veto serves as an Adaptive Gradient Veto that stabilizes optimization by suppressing harmful gradients on low-confidence tokens, while simultaneously acting as a Decisiveness Knob to balance reward-driven performance with output diversity. Extensive experiments across various reasoning and generation tasks demonstrate that Veto consistently outperforms supervised fine-tuning and existing on-policy baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) frequently produce source code that seems correct and well-formed, yet includes hallucinated elements that cause downstream test failures. In this study, we benchmark state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification methods and existing baselines for the task of hallucination detection in source code and introduce a diff-based pipeline to construct a code dataset annotated with line-level hallucinations. Building on this, we train a lightweight Transformer-based detector that uses LLM internal representations to identify hallucinations, substantially outperforming existing methods across several code generation domains. The detector also shows particular promise for enabling self-correction in LLM-based coding agents. We release the first publicly available dataset of line-level code hallucinations, along with the corresponding source code and trained hallucination detectors https://github.com/datapaf/CodeHallucinationDetection

Abstract:
Recent video generation models can produce smooth and visually appealing clips, but they often struggle to synthesize complex dynamics with a coherent chain of consequences. Accurately modeling visual outcomes and state transitions over time remains a core challenge. In contrast, large language and multimodal models (e.g., GPT-4o) exhibit strong visual state reasoning and future prediction capabilities. To bridge these strengths, we introduce VChain, a novel inference-time chain-of-visual-thought framework that injects visual reasoning signals from multimodal models into video generation. Specifically, VChain contains a dedicated pipeline that leverages large multimodal models to generate a sparse set of critical keyframes as snapshots, which are then used to guide the sparse inference-time visual-state adaptation of a pre-trained video generator only at these key moments. Our approach is tuning-efficient, introduces minimal overhead and avoids dense supervision. Extensive experiments on complex, multi-step scenarios show that VChain significantly enhances the quality of generated videos.

Abstract:
With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that rank models according to individual needs. We compute personalized model rankings using ELO ratings and Bradley-Terry coefficients for 115 active Chatbot Arena users and analyze how user query characteristics (topics and writing style) relate to LLM ranking variations. We demonstrate that individual rankings of LLM models diverge dramatically from aggregate LLM rankings, with Bradley-Terry correlations averaging only 𝜌 = 0.04 (57% of users show near-zero or negative correlation) and ELO ratings showing moderate correlation ( 𝜌 = 0.43 ). Through topic modeling and style analysis, we find users exhibit substantial heterogeneity in topical interests and communication styles, influencing their model preferences. We further show that a compact combination of topic and style features provides a useful feature space for predicting user-specific model rankings. Our results provide strong quantitative evidence that aggregate benchmarks fail to capture individual preferences for most users, and highlight the importance of developing personalized benchmarks that rank LLM models according to individual user preferences.

Abstract:
The capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are limited to some extent by pre-training, so some researchers optimize LLMs through post-training. Existing post-training strategies, such as memory-based retrieval or preference optimization, improve user alignment yet fail to enhance the model’s domain cognition. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Dual-Phase Self-Evolution (DPSE) framework that jointly optimizes user preference adaptation and domain-specific competence. DPSE introduces a Censor module to extract multi-dimensional interaction signals and estimate satisfaction scores, which guide structured data expansion via topic-aware and preference-driven strategies. These expanded datasets support a two-stage fine-tuning pipeline: supervised domain grounding followed by frequency-aware preference optimization. Experiments across general NLP benchmarks and long-term dialogue tasks demonstrate that DPSE consistently outperforms Supervised Fine-Tuning, Preference Optimization, and Memory-Augmented baselines. Ablation studies validate the contribution of each module. In this way, our framework provides an autonomous path toward continual self-evolution of LLMs.

Abstract:
While recent Multimodal Large Language Models exhibit impressive capabilities for general multimodal tasks, specialized domains like music necessitate tailored approaches. Music Audio-Visual Question Answering (Music AVQA) particularly underscores this, presenting unique challenges with its continuous, densely layered audio-visual content, intricate temporal dynamics, and the critical need for domain-specific knowledge. Through a systematic analysis of Music AVQA datasets and methods, this paper identifies that specialized input processing, architectures incorporating dedicated spatial-temporal designs, and music-specific modeling strategies are critical for success in this domain. Our study provides valuable insights for researchers by highlighting effective design patterns empirically linked to strong performance, proposing concrete future directions for incorporating musical priors, and aiming to establish a robust foundation for advancing multimodal musical understanding. We aim to encourage further research in this area and provide a GitHub repository of relevant works: https://github.com/WenhaoYou1/Survey4MusicAVQA.

Abstract:
Large reasoning language models such as OpenAI-o1 and Deepseek-R1 have recently attracted widespread attention due to their impressive task-solving abilities. However, the enormous model size and the generation of lengthy thought chains introduce significant reasoning costs and response latency. Existing methods for efficient reasoning mainly focus on reducing the number of model parameters or shortening the chain-of-thought length. In this paper, we introduce Speculative Chain-of-Thought (SCoT), which reduces reasoning latency from another perspective by accelerated average reasoning speed through large and small model collaboration. SCoT conducts thought-level drafting using a lightweight draft model. Then it selects the best CoT draft and corrects the error cases with the target model. The proposed thinking behavior alignment improves the efficiency of drafting and the draft selection strategy maintains the prediction accuracy of the target model for complex tasks. Experimental results on GSM8K, MATH, GaoKao, CollegeMath and Olympiad datasets show that SCoT reduces reasoning latency by 48% ∼ 66% and 21% ∼ 49% for Deepseek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and Deepseek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B while achieving near-target-model-level performance.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at natural language understanding and generation, yet their reliance on static pre-training corpora may lead to outdated knowledge, hallucinations, and limited adaptability. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these issues by grounding model outputs with external retrieval, but conventional RAG remains constrained by a fixed retrieve-then-generate routine and struggles with multi-step reasoning and tool calls. Agentic RAG addresses these limitations by enabling LLM agents to actively decompose tasks, issue exploratory queries, and refine evidence through iterative retrieval. Despite growing interest, the development of Agentic RAG is impeded by data scarcity: unlike traditional RAG, it requires challenging tasks that require planning, retrieval, and multiple reasoning decisions, and corresponding rich, interactive agent trajectories. This survey presents the first data-centric overview of Agentic RAG, framing its data lifecycle—data collecting, data preprocessing and task formulation, task construction, data for evaluation, and data enhancement for training—and cataloging representative training datasets and benchmarks in different domains (e.g. question answering, web, software engineering). From data perspectives, we aim to guide the creation of scalable, high-quality datasets for the next generation of adaptive, knowledge-seeking LLM agents. The project page is at https://github.com/fatty-belly/Awesome-AgenticRAG-Data/.

Abstract:
Role-playing models (RPMs) are widely used in real-world applications but underperform when deployed in the wild. This degradation can be attributed to distribution shifts, including user, character, and dialogue compositional shifts. Existing methods like LLM-as-a-judge fall short in providing a fine-grained diagnosis of how these shifts affect RPM generalization, and thus there lack formal frameworks to characterize RPM generalization behaviors. To bridge these gaps, we introduce an information-theoretic metric, named reasoning-based effective mutual information difference (R-EMID), to measure RPM performance degradation in an interpretable way. We also derive an upper bound on R-EMID to predict the worst-case generalization performance of RPMs and theoretically reveal how various shifts contribute to the RPM performance degradation. Moreover, we propose a co-evolving reinforcement learning framework to adaptively model the connection among user, character, and dialogue context and thus enhance the estimation of dialogue response generation probability, which is critical for calculating R-EMID. Finally, we evaluate the generalization performance of various RPMs using R-EMID, finding that user shift poses the highest risk among all shifts and reinforcement learning is the most effective approach for enhancing RPM generalization. Code and data are available at https://github.com/AlibabaResearch/DAMO-ConvAI/tree/main/RPM-Generalization.

Abstract:
Information seeking bridges the knowledge gap between a query and its answer. Although LLMs perform well broadly, their ability to close this gap is limited by pretraining and degrades on specialized or up-to-date queries. A common remedy augments LLMs with external knowledge, either by injecting retrieved evidence into context or interleaving retrieval with reasoning. The former limits exploration of layered dependencies, while the latter is bounded by context length, constraining efficiency and scalability. For complex tasks with intricate dependencies and large text volumes, both approaches become inadequate.To tackle this bottleneck, we present AWARE (Agentic Knowledge Warehouse), an agentic knowledge warehousing framework that transforms heterogeneous, unstructured data into minimal, task-conditioned knowledge representations consumable by LLMs. Rather than exposing raw text, AWARE constructs knowledge through intent planning, online multi-threaded exploration, and map-reduce evidence integration, producing compact, LLM-ready context under finite budgets. Specifically, it applies offline document structuring to generate document headers that support controlled access, performs exploration with targeted refinement to recover layered information dependencies, and integrates distributed evidence into task-aware representations for downstream answer generation. Experiments on GAIA, WebWalker, and BrowseComp-Plus show improvements over all baselines

Abstract:
Existing Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) methods, such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), have achieved remarkable progress in improving the reasoning capabilities of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). However, they exhibit limited exploration due to reliance on on-policy rollouts which are confined to the current policy’s distribution, resulting in narrow trajectory diversity. Recent approaches attempt to expand policy coverage by incorporating trajectories generated from stronger expert models, yet this reliance increases computational cost and such advanced models are often inaccessible. To address these issues, we propose In-Context Steered Policy Optimization (ICPO), a unified framework that leverages the inherent in-context learning capability of LRMs to provide expert guidance using existing datasets. ICPO introduces mixed-policy GRPO with implicit expert forcing, which expands exploration beyond the current policy distribution without requiring advanced LRM trajectories. To further stabilize optimization, ICPO integrates expert region reject sampling to filter unreliable off-policy trajectories and annealed expert-bonus reward shaping to balance early expert guidance with later autonomous improvement. Results demonstrate that ICPO consistently enhances RLVR performance and training stability on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, revealing a scalable and effective RLVR paradigm for LRMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/Celine-hxy/ICPO.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in open-domain dialogues. However, their performance in service dialogues remains suboptimal, as these require agents to guide users toward specific business objectives while dynamically tracking states and adapting strategies. This gap stems from the scarcity of high-quality training data and the difficulty in simulating authentic, goal-oriented user behaviors. We propose SEAD (Self-Evolving Agent for Service Dialogue), a framework that enables agents to learn effective strategies without large-scale human annotations. SEAD decouples user modeling into two components: a Profile Controller that generates diverse user states to manage training curriculum, and a User Simulator that focuses on realistic role-playing. This design ensures the environment provides adaptive training scenarios rather than acting as an unfair adversary.

Abstract:
Large language models can perform well on many isolated tasks, yet they continue to struggle on multi-turn, long-horizon agentic problems that require skills such as planning, state tracking, and long context processing. In this work, we aim to better understand the relative importance of advancing these underlying capabilities for success on such tasks. We develop an oracle counterfactual framework for multi-turn problems that asks: how would an agent perform if it could leverage an oracle to perfectly execute a specific skill? The change in the agent’s performance due to this oracle assistance allows us to measure the criticality of that skill in the future advancement of AI agents. We introduce a suite of procedurally generated, game-like tasks with tunable complexity. These controlled environments allow us to provide precise oracle interventions, such as perfect planning or flawless state tracking, and make it possible to isolate the contribution of each oracle without confounding effects present in real-world benchmarks. Our results show that while some interventions (e.g., planning) consistently improve performance across settings, the usefulness of other skills is dependent on the properties of the environment and language model. Our work sheds light on the challenges of multi-turn agentic environments to guide the future efforts in the development of AI agents and language models.

Abstract:
Spoken conversational systems require more than accurate speech generation to have human-like conversations: to feel natural and engaging, they must produce conversational behaviour that adapts dynamically to the context. Current spoken conversational systems, however, rarely allow such customization, limiting their naturalness and usability. In this work, we present the first open, instruction-following full-duplex conversational speech model that can be trained efficiently under typical academic resource constraints. By keeping the audio encoder frozen and finetuning only the language model, our model requires just 2,000 hours of data, without relying on large-scale pretraining or multi-stage optimization. The model can follow explicit instructions to control speaker voice, conversation topic, conversational behaviour (e.g., backchanneling and interruptions), and dialogue initiation. We propose a single-stage training protocol and systematically analyze design choices. Both the model and training code is released to enable reproducible research on controllable full-duplex speech systems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in simulating human behavior, yet existing agents often exhibit behavioral rigidity, a flaw frequently masked by the self-referential bias of current "LLM-as-a-judge" evaluations. By evaluating against empirical ground truth, we reveal a counter-intuitive phenomenon: increasing the intensity of prompt-driven reasoning does not enhance fidelity but rather exacerbates value polarization, collapsing population diversity. To address this, we propose the Context-Value-Action (CVA) architecture, grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model and Schwartz’s Theory of Basic Human Values. Unlike methods relying on self-verification, CVA decouples action generation from cognitive reasoning via a novel Value Verifier trained on authentic human data to explicitly model dynamic value activation. Experiments on CVABench, which comprises over 1.1 million real-world interaction traces, demonstrate that CVA significantly outperforms baselines. Our approach effectively mitigates polarization while offering superior behavioral fidelity and interpretability.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit growing safety and alignment risks, hindering their deployment in high-stakes decision-making scenarios. In this paper, we identify a previously underexplored risk: similar to humans, LLMs can exhibit egoistic decision-making, in which they pursue short-term self-benefits through improper means while disregarding collective welfare and ethical constraints. We term this phenomenon Strategic Egoism (SE). To systematically evaluate SE, we introduce SEBench, a benchmark comprising 880 decision-making scenarios across 11 domains involving explicit profit temptations, which measures egoistic behavior along 6 psychologically grounded dimensions (e.g., rule circumvention). Each scenario adopts a single-role decision-making setting with carefully designed choice options to elicit self-serving strategies. Extensive experiments on 9 proprietary LLMs reveal that SE behaviors are widespread, with an average occurrence rate of 67.96%, and frequently manifest as manipulative coercion. Notably, we find that models more susceptible to profit temptations also exhibit broader safety deficiencies, including higher toxicity, lower truthfulness, increased jailbreak vulnerability, and elevated Dark Triad–style trait scores. Drawing inspiration from psychological interventions, we further propose SEGuard, a lightweight mitigation that reinforces situational constraints and suppresses egoistic tactics.

Abstract:
Multi-objective preference alignment often faces alignment conflicts, where optimizing for one objective (e.g., helpfulness) degrades performance on others (e.g., harmlessness). While prior work focuses on algorithmic solutions, the intrinsic conflict within data and its theoretical impact on training remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce the principle of Reward Consistency (RC), a theory-grounded criterion that approximates the alignment conflicts via reward models. We prove that a sample mitigates conflicts if and only if it satisfies RC, thereby ensuring improvement across all objectives during optimization. Building on this, we propose Reward Consistency Sampling (RCS), an automated framework for constructing pairwise data that adheres to RC, supplemented by a relaxation strategy to enhance flexibility. Extensive experiments show that RCS brings significant and consistent performance gains, achieving an average improvement of 23.07% in both harmlessness and helpfulness during simultaneous optimization comparde to the vanilla dataset. Our data-centric approach is complementary to existing alignment algorithms and effective in both sequential and simultaneous optimization scenarios.

Abstract:
With the rapid advancement of speech generation technologies, the threat posed by speech deepfakes in real-time communication (RTC) scenarios has intensified. However, existing detection studies mainly focus on offline simulations and struggle to cope with the complex distortions introduced during RTC transmission, including unknown speech enhancement processes (e.g., noise suppression) and codec compression. To address this challenge, we present the first large-scale speech deepfake dataset tailored for RTC scenarios, termed RTCFake, totaling approximately 600 hours. The dataset is constructed by transmitting speech through multiple mainstream social media and conferencing platforms (e.g., Zoom), enabling precise pairing between offline and online speech. In addition, we propose a phoneme-guided consistency learning (PCL) strategy that enforces models to learn platform-invariant semantic structural representations. In this paper, the RTCFake dataset is divided into training, development, and evaluation sets. The evaluation set further includes both unseen RTC platforms and unseen complex noise conditions, thereby providing a more realistic and challenging evaluation benchmark for speech deepfake detection. Furthermore, the proposed PCL strategy achieves significant improvements in both cross-platform generalization and noise robustness, offering an effective and generalizable modeling paradigm.

Abstract:
Detecting speech deepfakes is critical for protecting society against fraud, identity theft, and the misuse of modern speech synthesis technologies. Despite recent progress, existing countermeasures often exhibit limited generalization to unseen spoofing attacks, particularly in out-of-domain evaluation settings, even when achieving strong in-domain performance. Transformer architectures have become ubiquitous in anti-spoofing, serving both as feature extractors (e.g., wav2vec 2.0) and as classifiers. However, deep transformer stacks exhibit substantial representational redundancy across adjacent layers, with similarity increasing toward deeper layers. As a result, task-specific specialization is largely concentrated in the final layers, while shallow layers remain underutilized during fine-tuning. In this work, we analyze the layer-wise behavior of transformer-based classifiers for speech deepfake detection and propose a training strategy that explicitly aligns shallow and intermediate representations with those of the final transformer layer. By encouraging all layers to mimic the task-specialized representation learned at depth, the model more effectively exploits early-layer features while preserving discriminative capacity in deeper layers. This design improves robustness to unseen spoofing attacks and enhances out-of-domain generalization. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent performance gains over strong baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive success in single-turn function calling, yet real-world applications such as travel planning or multi-stage data analysis typically unfold across multi-turn conversations. In these settings, LLMs must not only issue accurate function calls at each step but also maintain progress awareness, the ability to summarize past interactions and plan future actions to ensure coherent, long-horizon task execution. Existing approaches, however, either reduce multi-turn training to isolated single-turn samples, which neglects task-level planning, or employ end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) that struggles with redundancy and lacks explicit integration of progress awareness. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Progra, a framework that explicitly incorporates progress awareness into LLM training for multi-turn function calling. Progra combines (i) a Progress Awareness Generation (PAG) pipeline, which automatically constructs datasets coupling conversation summaries with future task planning, and (ii) a Progress Awareness-Guided Reinforcement Learning (PAG-RL) algorithm, which integrates progress awareness into RL training to reduce contextual redundancy and improve alignment between local actions and global task completion. Empirical results on two public benchmarks demonstrate that Progra significantly outperforms existing methods, highlighting the effectiveness of progress awareness in enabling robust and efficient multi-turn function calling. Our code is available at https://github.com/FatCatCHC/Progra .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive reasoning capabilities but often suffer from Embodied Semantic Hallucinations—generating plans that are semantically fluent but physically unsafe due to a lack of grounded common sense. Existing safety alignment methods, such as RLHF or naive safety prompting, typically fall into a Safety-Utility Trade-off, resulting in severe over-rejection of benign household instructions. To address this, we propose MADRA (Multi-Agent Debate for Risk Awareness), a training-free cognitive architecture that mimics System-2 deliberation. MADRA introduces a meta-cognitive Critical Agent that evaluates peer debates using a structured argumentation framework derived from the Toulmin Model, effectively mitigating the "herd mentality" in multi-agent systems. We also introduce SafeAware-VH, a benchmark featuring adversarial safe instructions designed to probe agents’ sensitivity to physical risks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MADRA breaks the Pareto frontier, achieving over 90% rejection of unsafe tasks while maintaining high utility, significantly outperforming standard Chain-of-Thought and single-agent reflection baselines.

Abstract:
Agentic workflows solve complex tasks by orchestrating modular components (e.g., planning, reasoning, action, reflection) built on top of LLM backbones. A practical but underexplored question is model allocation: given a fixed workflow decomposition and a pool of candidate LLMs, which components should be upgraded (and with which models) to upgrade task performance, and how can we attribute gains to individual upgrades and their interactions?We present ShapleyFlow, a cooperative game theoretic framework that models component upgrades as players and evaluates component coalitions to compute Shapley values. This yields interaction-aware attribution and supports Shapley-guided configuration recommendation for model allocation under a fixed workflow structure.We further introduce CapaBench, a benchmark of 1,500+ tasks across seven domains (shopping, navigation, ticketing, mathematics, operating systems, robotic coordination, and automated theorem proving).Across 9 representative LLMs and all 2 4 upgrade coalitions in a 4-component workflow, ShapleyFlow provides (i) principled, interaction-aware attribution for modular workflows and (ii) actionable model-allocation recommendations that improve over strong single-model baselines.

Abstract:
In recent years, the non-deterministic properties of language models have garnered considerable attention and have shown a significant influence on real-world applications. However, such properties remain under-explored in machine translation (MT), a complex, non-deterministic NLP task. In this study, we systematically evaluate modern MT systems and identify temperature-constrained N on- D eterministic MT ( ND-MT ) as a distinct phenomenon. Additionally, we demonstrate that ND-MT exhibits significant potential in addressing the multimodality issue that has long challenged MT research and provides higher-quality candidates than D eterministic MT (D-MT) under temperature constraints. However, ND-MT introduces new challenges in evaluating system performance. Specifically, the evaluation framework designed for D-MT fails to yield consistent evaluation results when applied to ND-MT. We further investigate this emerging challenge by evaluating state-of-the-art ND-MT systems using both lexical-based and semantic-based metrics at varying sampling sizes. The results reveal a Buckets Effect across these systems: the ranking of ND-MT systems is dominated by the worst-quality candidate translation, as shown by automatic evaluation metrics. To mitigate this issue, we propose ExpectoSample, a strategy that first identifies reliable metrics and then enables robust ND-MT system selection for real-world.

Abstract:
The shift toward intent-driven software engineering (often termed "Vibe Coding") exposes a critical Context-Fidelity Trade-off: vague user intents overwhelm linear reasoning chains, leading to architectural collapse in complex repo-level generation. We propose Contract-Coding, a structured symbolic paradigm that bridges unstructured intent and executable code via Autonomous Symbolic Grounding. By projecting ambiguous intents into a formal Language Contract, our framework serves as a Single Source of Truth (SSOT) that enforces topological independence, effectively inter-module implementation details, decreasing a topological execution depth and unlocking Architectural Parallelism. Empirically, while state-of-the-art agents suffer from different hallucinations on the Greenfield-5 benchmark, Contract-Coding achieves 47% functional success while maintaining near-perfect structural integrity. Our work marks a critical step towards repository-scale autonomous engineering: transitioning from strict "specification-following" to robust, intent-driven architecture synthesis. Our code is available at https://github.com/imliinyi/Contract-Coding

Abstract:
Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a promising approach for improving LLM reasoning capabilities by providing process supervision over reasoning traces. However, existing approaches for constructing PRM training data remain costly and noisy, as they typically rely on human annotation or sampling-based labeling methods that require repeated LLM calls. In this work, we propose FoVer, a framework that synthesizes PRM training data from formal reasoning tasks by annotating step-level error labels using formal verification tools such as Z3 and Isabelle. By leveraging formal verification, FoVer enables efficient and accurate PRM data construction without requiring human annotation or additional LLM calls. Using FoVer, we create PRM training data from formal logic and theorem proving tasks. Experiments on 12 reasoning benchmarks show that fine-tuning on our training data improves PRMs not only on math and logic reasoning tasks, which are informal variants of the training tasks, but also on NLI and BBH benchmarks, which differ substantially from the tasks used to construct the training data. These results demonstrate the practical effectiveness of FoVer, showing that PRM training data created using formal verification improves PRMs on informal reasoning tasks written in natural language. The datasets, models, and code are provided at https://github.com/psunlpgroup/FoVer.

Abstract:
Hate, derogatory, and offensive speech remains a persistent challenge in online platforms and public discourse. While automated detection systems are widely used, most focus on censorship or removal, raising concerns for transparency and freedom of expression, and limiting opportunities to explain why content is harmful. To address these issues, explanatory approaches have emerged as a promising solution, aiming to make hate speech detection more transparent, accountable, and informative. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach that combines Large Language Models (LLMs) with three newly created and curated vocabularies to detect and explain hate speech in English, French, and Greek. Our system captures both inherently derogatory expressions tied to identity characteristics and direct group-targeted content through two complementary pipelines: one that detects and disambiguates problematic terms using the curated vocabularies, and one that leverages LLMs as context-aware evaluators of group-targeting content. The outputs are fused into grounded explanations that clarify why content is flagged. Human evaluation shows that our hybrid approach is accurate, with high-quality explanations, outperforming LLM-only baselines.

Abstract:
We study the reasoning behavior of large language models (LLMs) under limited computation budgets. In such settings, producing useful partial solutions quickly is often more practical than exhaustive reasoning, which incurs high inference costs. Many real-world tasks, such as trip planning, require models to deliver the best possible output within a fixed reasoning budget. We introduce an anytime reasoning framework and the Anytime Index, a metric that quantifies how effectively solution quality improves as reasoning tokens increase. To further enhance efficiency, we propose an inference-time self-improvement method using LLM-synthesized preference data, where models learn from their own reasoning comparisons to produce better intermediate solutions. Experiments on NaturalPlan (Trip), AIME, and GPQA datasets show consistent gains across Grok-3, GPT-oss, GPT-4.1/4o, and LLaMA models, improving both reasoning quality and efficiency under budget constraints.

Abstract:
Evaluating the instruction-following (IF) capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) is essential for rigorously assessing how faithfully model outputs adhere to user-specified intentions. Nevertheless, existing benchmarks for evaluating MLLMs’ instruction-following capability primarily focus on verbal instructions in the textual modality. These limitations hinder a thorough analysis of instruction-following capabilities, as they overlook the implicit constraints embedded in the semantically rich visual modality. To address this gap, we introduce VC-IFEval, a new benchmark accompanied by a systematically constructed dataset that evaluates MLLMs’ instruction-following ability under multimodal settings. Our benchmark systematically incorporates vision-dependent constraints into instruction design, enabling a more rigorous and fine-grained assessment of how well MLLMs align their outputs with both visual input and textual instructions. Furthermore, by fine-tuning MLLMs on our dataset, we achieve substantial gains in visual instruction-following accuracy and adherence. Through extensive evaluation across representative MLLMs, we provide new insights into the strengths and limitations of current models.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse domains, yet their decision-making under conflicting objectives remains insufficiently understood. This work investigates how LRMs respond to harmful queries when confronted with two categories of conflicts: internal conflicts that pit alignment values against each other and dilemmas, which impose mutually contradictory choices, including sacrificial, duress, agent-centered, and social forms. Using over 1,300 prompts across five benchmarks, we evaluate three representative LRMs - Llama-3.1-Nemotron-8B, QwQ-32B, and DeepSeek R1 - and find that conflicts significantly increase attack success rates, even under single-round non-narrative queries without sophisticated auto-attack techniques. Our findings reveal through layerwise and neuron-level analyses that safety-related and functional representations shift and overlap under conflict, interfering with safety-aligned behavior. This study highlights the need for deeper alignment strategies to ensure the robustness and trustworthiness of next-generation reasoning models. Our code is available at https://github.com/DataArcTech/ConflictHarm. Warning: This paper contains inappropriate, offensive and harmful content.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to incorporate external knowledge at inference time. However, when retrieved contexts are noisy, incomplete, or heterogeneous, a single generation process often struggles to reconcile evidence effectively. We propose MASS-RAG, a multi-agent synthesis approach to retrieval-augmented generation that structures evidence processing into multiple role-specialized agents. MASS-RAG applies distinct agents for evidence summarization, evidence extraction, and reasoning over retrieved documents, and combines their outputs through a dedicated synthesis stage to produce the final answer. This design exposes multiple intermediate evidence views, allowing the model to compare and integrate complementary information before answer generation. Experiments on four benchmarks show that MASS-RAG consistently improves performance over strong RAG baselines, particularly in settings where relevant evidence is distributed across retrieved contexts.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful but costly to train, with scaling laws predicting performance from model size, data, and compute. However, different programming languages (PLs) have varying impacts during pre-training that significantly affect base model performance, leading to inaccurate performance prediction. Existing works focus on language-agnostic settings, neglecting the inherently multilingual nature of modern software development. Therefore, it is first necessary to investigate the scaling laws of different PLs, and then consider their mutual influences to arrive at the final multilingual scaling law. In this paper, we present the first systematic exploration of scaling laws for multilingual code pre-training, conducting over 1000+ experiments (Equivalent to 336,000+ H800 hours) across multiple PLs, model sizes (0.2B to 14B parameters), and dataset sizes (1T tokens). We establish scaling laws for code LLMs across multiple programming languages, showing that interpreted languages benefit more from increased scale than compiled ones. Multilingual pre-training provides synergistic benefits, especially between syntactically similar languages, with parallel pairing (concatenating code with translations) significantly enhancing cross-lingual abilities. We propose a proportion-dependent multilingual scaling law that optimally allocates training tokens by prioritizing high-utility languages (e.g., Python), balancing high-synergy pairs (e.g., JavaScript-TypeScript), and reducing allocation to fast-saturating languages (e.g., Rust), achieving superior performance across all languages compared to uniform distribution.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are highly sensitive to prompts, but most automatic prompt optimization (APO) methods assume access to ground-truth references (e.g., labeled validation data) that are costly to obtain. We propose the Prompt Duel Optimizer (PDO), a sample-efficient framework for label-free prompt optimization based on pairwise preference feedback from an LLM judge. PDO casts prompt selection as a dueling-bandit problem and combines (i) Double Thompson Sampling to prioritize informative comparisons under a fixed judge budget, with (ii) top-performer guided mutation to expand the candidate pool while pruning weak prompts. Experiments on BIG-bench Hard (BBH) and MS MARCO show that PDO consistently identifies stronger prompts than label-free baselines, while offering favorable quality–cost trade-offs under constrained comparison budgets.

Abstract:
Multi-modal retrieval-augmented generation (MM-RAG) relies heavily on re-rankers to surface the most relevant evidence for image-question queries. However, standard re-rankers typically process the full query image as a global embedding, making them susceptible to visual distractors (e.g., background clutter) that skew similarity scores.We propose Region-R1, a query-side region cropping framework that formulates region selection as a decision-making problem during re-ranking, allowing the system to learn to retain the full image or focus only on a question-relevant region before scoring the retrieved candidates. Region-R1 learns a policy with a novel region-aware group relative policy optimization (r-GRPO) to dynamically crop a discriminative region. Across two challenging benchmarks, E-VQA and InfoSeek, Region-R1 delivers consistent gains, achieving state-of-the-art performances by increasing conditional Recall@1 by up to 20%. These results show the great promise of query-side adaptation as a simple but effective way to strengthen MM-RAG re-ranking.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made strong progress in reasoning. To enhance the reasoning performance, a common inference-time approach is tree-based search, which decomposes the reasoning process into multiple steps, expands multiple reasoning paths, and uses reward models to prune and select candidates. However, based on our exploration, the simple decomposition may lead to suboptimal searching efficiency: while planning is generally harder, it is the execution errors that are more likely to propagate to later steps. This indicates that planning and execution play different roles in reasoning and should be treated differently during tree-based search. Given this, to enhance the searching efficiency, we propose a dual-phase test-time scaling framework that separates reasoning into planning and execution, and performs search over each phase independently. To further refine the algorithm, we also introduce a dynamic budget allocation mechanism that adaptively redistributes sampling effort based on reward feedback, allowing early stopping on confident steps and reallocation of computation to more challenging steps. Experiments on both math reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently improves accuracy while reducing redundant computation.

Abstract:
Despite significant progress in alignment, large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks that elicit harmful behaviors. Activation steering techniques offer a promising inference-time intervention approach, but existing methods suffer from critical limitations: activation addition requires careful coefficient tuning and is sensitive to layer-specific norm variations, while directional ablation provides only binary control. Recent work on Angular Steering introduces continuous control via rotation in a 2D subspace, but its practical implementation violates norm preservation, causing distribution shift and generation collapse, particularly in models below 7B parameters. We propose Selective Steering , which addresses these limitations through two key innovations: (1) a mathematically rigorous norm-preserving rotation formulation that maintains activation distribution integrity, and (2) discriminative layer selection that applies steering only where feature representations exhibit opposite-signed class alignment. Experiments across nine models demonstrate that Selective Steering achieves 5.5 higher attack success rates than prior methods while maintaining zero perplexity violations and approximately 100% capability retention on standard benchmarks. Our approach provides a principled, efficient framework for controllable and stable LLM behavior modification.

Abstract:
In-context learning (ICL) performance depends critically on which demonstrations are placed in the prompt, yet most existing selectors prioritize heuristic notions of relevance or diversity and provide limited insight into the coverage of a demonstration set. We propose Unseen Coverage Selection (UCS) , a training-free, subset-level coverage prior motivated by the principle that a good demonstration set should expose the model to latent cluster unrevealed by the currently selected subset . UCS operationalizes this idea by (1) inducing discrete latent clusters from model-consistent embeddings and (2) estimating the number of unrevealed clusters within a candidate subset via a Smoothed Good-Turing estimator from its empirical frequency spectrum. Unlike previous selection methods, UCS is coverage-based and training-free, and can be seamlessly combined with both query-dependent and query-independent selection baselines via a simple regularized objective. Experiments on multiple intent-classification and reasoning benchmarks with frontier Large Language Models show that augmenting strong baselines with UCS consistently improves ICL accuracy by up to 2-6 % under the same selection budget, while also yielding insights into task- and model-level latent cluster distributions. Code is available at https://github.com/Raina-Xin/UCS.

Abstract:
Safety guardrails in large language models (LLMs) are developed to prevent malicious users from generating toxic content at a large scale. However, these measures can inadvertently introduce or reflect new biases, as LLMs may refuse to generate harmful content targeting some demographic groups and not others. We explore this selective refusal bias in LLM guardrails through the lens of refusal rates of targeted individual and intersectional demographic groups, types of LLM responses, and length of generated refusals. Our results show evidence of selective refusal bias across gender, sexual orientation, nationality, and religion attributes. This leads us to investigate additional safety implications via an indirect attack, where we target previously refused groups, and find that Llama 3.1 fails to defend against our attack in roughly 89% of the trials. Our findings emphasize the need for more equitable and robust performance in safety guardrails across demographic groups.

Abstract:
Reasoning in humans is prone to biases due to underlying motivations like identity protection, that undermine rational decision-making and judgment. This motivated reasoning at a collective level can be detrimental to society when debating critical issues such as human-driven climate change or vaccine safety, and can further aggravate political polarization. Prior studies have reported that large language models (LLMs) are also susceptible to human-like cognitive biases, however, the extent to which LLMs selectively reason toward identity-congruent conclusions remains largely unexplored. Here, we investigate whether assigning 8 personas across 4 political and socio-demographic attributes induces motivated reasoning in LLMs. Testing 8 LLMs (open source and proprietary) across two reasoning tasks from human-subject studies — veracity discernment of misinformation headlines and evaluation of numeric scientific evidence — we find that persona-assigned LLMs have up to 9% reduced veracity discernment relative to models without personas. Political personas specifically are up to 90% more likely to correctly evaluate scientific evidence on gun control when the ground truth is congruent with their induced political identity. Prompt-based debiasing methods are largely ineffective at mitigating these effects. Taken together, our empirical findings are the first to suggest that persona-assigned LLMs exhibit human-like motivated reasoning that is hard to mitigate through conventional debiasing prompts — raising concerns of exacerbating identity-congruent reasoning in both LLMs and humans.

Abstract:
We propose Data Swarms, an algorithm to optimize the generation of synthetic evaluation data and advance quantitative desiderata of LLM evaluation. We first train a swarm of initial data generators using existing data, and define various evaluation objectives to reflect the desired properties of evaluation (e.g., generate more difficult problems for the evaluated models) and quantitatively evaluate data generators. We then employ particle swarm optimization to optimize the swarm of data generators, where they collaboratively search through the model parameter space to find new generators that advance these objectives. We further extend it to Adversarial Swarms, where the data generator swarm generates harder data while the test taker model swarm learns from such data, co-evolving dynamically for better data and models simultaneously. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Data Swarms outperforms eight data generation baselines across five evaluation objectives, while Adversarial Swarms produce more robust learning of synthetic data and stronger generalization. Further analysis reveals that Data Swarms successfully optimizes compositions of multiple evaluation objectives and generalizes to new off-the-shelf LLMs, unseen at optimization time.

Abstract:
Using LLMs not to predict plans but to formalize an environment into the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) has been shown to improve performance and control. While most existing methodology only applies to fully observable environments, we adapt to the more realistic and challenging partially observable environments without sufficient information to make a complete plan. We propose PDDLego+, a framework to iteratively formalize, plan, grow, and refine PDDL representations by decomposing the environment and the goal into fully observable episodes. Without fine-tuning, in-context exemplars, or trajectories, PDDLego+ improves planning success and exhibits robustness against problem complexity compared to end-to-end approaches. We also show that the domain knowledge captured after a successful trial can benefit future tasks.

Abstract:
Text classification has long been a cornerstone of NLP, yet most prior work and benchmarks have been limited to closed-world settings, where all classes are assumed to be known in advance. In contrast, open-world learning has recently emerged as a critical paradigm for building more robust and realistic systems. However, existing benchmarks largely focus on out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, while overlooking broader challenges such as the discovery of novel categories. To address this gap, we introduce BOLT, a unified Benchmark and evaluation toolkit supporting Open-world Learning for Text classification. BOLT encompasses two representative tasks: Open-set Text Classification (OSTC), which requires models to classify in-distribution (ID) samples while rejecting OOD inputs, and Generalized Category Discovery (GCD), which aims to identify both known and novel categories from partially labeled corpora. We carefully curate 12 publicly available datasets spanning diverse domains and benchmark 22 methods, including 15 for OSTC and 7 for GCD, under a standardized protocol that explicitly accounts for varying labeled ratios and known class ratios. Our results reveal key challenges: most current methods tend to overfit training distributions and struggle to generalize to unseen classes. Moreover, by comparing our lightweight LLM-based variants with prior open-set baselines, we demonstrate the promise of leveraging LLMs for open-world text classification. BOLT provides standardized evaluation protocols that enable fair comparison and support future research in this emerging area. All datasets, baselines, and tools are available at https://github.com/CNIC-DSL/BOLT.

Abstract:
With the proliferation of LLM-driven multi-agent systems (MAS), the security of Web links has become a critical concern. Once MAS is induced to trust a malicious link, attackers can use it as a springboard to expand the attack surface. In this paper, we propose Web Fraud Attacks, a novel type of attack manipulating unique structures of web links to deceive MAS. We design 12 representative attack variants that encompass various methods, such as homoglyph deception, sub-directory nesting, and parameter obfuscation. Through extensive experiments on these attack vectors, we demonstrate that Web fraud attacks not only exhibit significant destructive potential across different MAS architectures but also possess a distinct advantage in evasion: they circumvent the need for complex input design, lowering the threshold for attacks significantly. These results underscore the importance of addressing Web fraud attacks, providing new insights into MAS safety.

Abstract:
While Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning (RFT) are standard for LLM alignment, they either rely on costly expert data or discard valuable negative samples, leading to data inefficiency. To address this, we propose Reward Informed Fine-Tuning (RIFT), a simple yet effective framework that utilizes all self-generated samples. Unlike the hard thresholding of RFT, RIFT repurposes negative trajectories, reweighting the loss with scalar rewards to learn from both the positive and negative trajectories from the model outputs. To overcome the training collapse caused by naive reward integration, where direct multiplication yields an unbounded loss, we introduce a stabilized loss formulation that ensures numerical robustness and optimization efficiency. Extensive experiments on mathematical benchmarks across various base models show that RIFT consistently outperforms RFT. Our results demonstrate that RIFT is a robust and data-efficient alternative for alignment using mixed-quality, self-generated data.

Abstract:
Chunking strategies significantly impact the effectiveness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Existing methods operate within fixed-granularity paradigms that rely on static boundary identification, limiting their adaptability to diverse query requirements. This paper presents FreeChunker, a Cross-Granularity Encoding Framework that fundamentally transforms the traditional chunking paradigm: the framework treats sentences as atomic units and shifts from static chunk segmentation to flexible retrieval supporting arbitrary sentence combinations. This paradigm shift not only significantly avoids the computational overhead required for semantic boundary detection, but also enhances adaptability to complex queries. Experimental evaluation on LongBench V2 demonstrates that FreeChunker possesses significant advantages in both retrieval performance and time efficiency compared to existing chunking methods. The pre-trained models and codes are available at https://github.com/mazehart/FreeChunker.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by conditioning generation on retrieved external documents, but the effect of retrieved context is often non-trivial. In realistic retrieval settings, the retrieved document set often contains a mixture of documents that vary in relevance and usefulness. While prior work has largely examined these phenomena through output behavior, little is known about how retrieved context shapes the internal representations that mediate information integration in RAG. In this work, we study RAG through the lens of latent representations. We systematically analyze how different types of retrieved documents affect the hidden states of LLMs, and how these internal representation shifts relate to downstream generation behavior. Across four question-answering datasets and three LLMs, we analyze internal representations under controlled single- and multi-document settings. Our results reveal how context relevancy and layer-wise processing influence internal representations, providing explanations of LLMs’ output behaviors and insights for RAG system design.

Abstract:
As code large language models (LLMs) evolve into tool-interactive agents via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), their generalization is increasingly limited by low-quality synthetic data and the diminishing returns of quantity scaling; moreover, quantity-centric scaling exhibits an early bottleneck that underutilizes trajectory data. We propose TDScaling, a Trajectory Diversity Scaling-based data synthesis framework for code agents that scales performance through diversity rather than raw volume. Moreover, TDScaling is more data-efficient: under a fixed training budget, increasing trajectory diversity yields larger gains than adding more trajectories, improving the performance-cost trade-off for agent training. TDScaling integrates four innovations: (1) a Business Cluster mechanism that captures real-service logical dependencies; (2) a Blueprint-driven multi-agent paradigm that enforces trajectory coherence; (3) an adaptive evolution mechanism that steers synthesis toward long-tail scenarios using Domain Entropy, Reasoning Mode Entropy, and Cumulative Action Complexity to prevent mode collapse; and (4) a sandboxed code tool that mitigates catastrophic forgetting of intrinsic coding capabilities. Experiments on general tool-use benchmarks (BFCL, 𝜏 2 -Bench) and code agent tasks (RebenchT, CodeCI, BIRD) demonstrate a win-win outcome: TDScaling improves both tool-use generalization and inherent coding proficiency. Crucially, we show that trajectory diversity scaling attains a substantially higher performance ceiling than quantity scaling, establishing a resource-efficient paradigm for training robust code agents under data bottlenecks.

Abstract:
Modern generative models still lack human-level creativity, particularly in multi-branch diversity. Prior approaches to address this problem often incur heavy computation or strong dependency on model architecture. Therefore, we introduce UAG(Universal Avoidance Generation), a model-agnostic and computationally efficient generation strategy that penalizes similarity among previously generated outputs. Thus, UAG can enhance multi-branch diversity across both diffusion and transformer models, with minimal additional computation. In experiments, our method achieves up to 1.9 times higher diversity, runs 4.4 times faster, and requires only 1/64 of the FLOPs compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) reach state-of-the-art performance across many NLP tasks, but their large parameter counts introduce heavy computational and memory overhead, which complicates deployment in resource-constrained settings. Pruning is a standard compression strategy that induces sparsity to lower these costs. However, most pruning methods for LLMs depend on calibration data and expensive weight updates, which limits practical scalability. To address these limitations, we introduce H aar W avelet S ubband P runing (), a post-training framework that requires no calibration data and no weight updates. applies a two-dimensional Haar wavelet transform to each weight matrix and decomposes it into four frequency subbands. It then assigns a uniform sparsity ratio to all subbands so that both low- and high-frequency components are retained in a balanced manner. Our theoretical analysis shows that the subband design of provides a deterministic per-subband retention guarantee, which helps mitigate the potential bias of global magnitude pruning toward dominant frequency components. Experiments on the LLaMA, OPT and Qwen model families show that achieves competitive accuracy relative to strong pruning baselines while substantially reducing pruning time. Compared with magnitude pruning, which serves as a simple calibration-free baseline, generally achieves better downstream performance across a wide range of sparsity levels and model scales.

Abstract:
Causal inference is essential for decision-making but remains challenging for non-experts. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in this domain, their precise causal estimation capabilities are still limited, and the impact of post-training on these abilities is insufficiently explored. This paper examines the extent to which post-training can enhance LLMs’ capacity for causal inference. We introduce CausalGym, a comprehensive dataset comprising seven core causal tasks for training and five diverse test sets. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluate five post-training approaches: SFT, DPO, KTO, PPO, and GRPO. Across five in-domain and four existing benchmarks, our experiments demonstrate that appropriate post-training enables smaller LLMs to perform causal inference competitively, often surpassing much larger models. Our 14B-parameter model achieves 93.5% accuracy on the CaLM benchmark, compared to 55.4% by OpenAI o3. Furthermore, the post-trained LLMs exhibit strong generalization and robustness under real-world conditions such as distribution shifts and noisy data. Collectively, these findings provide the first systematic evidence that targeted post-training can produce reliable and robust LLM-based causal reasoners.

Abstract:
Adapting language models to new data distributions by simple finetuning is challenging. This is due to the rigidity of their subword tokenizers, which typically remain unchanged during adaptation. This inflexibility often leads to inefficient tokenization, causing overfragmentation of text in out-of-distribution domains, unseen languages, or scripts. In this work, we develop byte-level LMs with learnable tokenizers to make tokenization adaptive. Our models include a submodule that learns to predict boundaries given the input byte sequence, encoding it into variable-length segments. Most tokenizer-free methods train this boundary predictor using an auxiliary loss that enforces a fixed compression rate across the training corpus, introducing a new kind of rigidity. We propose FLEXITOKENS, a simplified training objective that enables significantly greater flexibility during adaptation. Evaluating across multiple multilingual benchmarks, morphologically diverse tasks, and domains, we demonstrate that FLEXITOKENS consistently reduces token over-fragmentation and achieves up to 10% point improvements on token classification and generative tasks compared to BPE and other gradient-based tokenizer baselines. We validate our findings using models of varying sizes, and our method demonstrates consistent improvements across scales.

Abstract:
The AdamW optimizer, while standard for LLM pretraining, is a critical memory bottleneck, consuming optimizer states equivalent to twice the model’s size. Although light-state optimizers like SinkGD attempt to address this issue, we identify the embedding layer dilemma: these methods fail to handle the sparse, high-variance gradients inherent to embeddings, forcing a hybrid design that reverts to AdamW and partially negates the memory gains. We propose SAGE (Sign Adaptive GradiEnt), a novel optimizer that resolves this dilemma by replacing AdamW in this hybrid structure. SAGE combines a Lion-style update direction with a new, memory-efficient O(d) adaptive scale. This scale acts as a "safe damper," provably bounded by 1.0, which tames high-variance dimensions more effectively than existing methods. This superior stability allows SAGE to achieve better convergence. On Llama models up to 1.3B parameters, our SAGE-based hybrid achieves new state-of-the-art perplexity, outperforming all baselines, including SinkGD hybrid, while significantly reducing optimizer state memory.

Abstract:
Multi-turn jailbreaking is a critical approach for evaluating the safety of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods largely rely on heuristic strategies or trained attack agents, lacking a unified state-action formulation and systematic search over strategy compositions, and often struggling to balance attack success rate with query overhead. We propose RAMP, which formulates multi-turn jailbreaking as a risk-aware PDDL planning problem. Specifically, we characterize dialogue safety using predicate-based states, abstract common jailbreak strategies as high-level actions, and introduce a closed-loop framework that iteratively plans and executes each turn via a Judge, a Transitioner, and a Planner. Experimental results show that RAMP achieves consistently strong attack performance across both open-source and closed-source target models, while remaining effective under stricter turn budgets and yielding a favorable efficiency–effectiveness trade-off. Ablation studies, interpretability analyses, and extended experiments further show that multi-step planning, clue accumulation, and consistent findings across evaluator settings are key factors underlying these gains.

Abstract:
The current RAG system requires uploading plaintext documents to the cloud, risking private data leakage. Parametric RAG (PRAG) encodes documents as LoRA parameters within LLMs, offering a possible way to reduce exposure of raw content. However, it still faces two issues: (1) PRAG demands synthesizing QA pairs and fine-tuning LLM for each individual document to create its corresponding LoRA, leading to unacceptable inference latency. (2) The performance of PRAG relies solely on synthetic QA data while lacking internal alignment with standard RAG, resulting in poor generalization on out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. Therefore, achieving high-efficiency parameterization while maintaining RAG-level performance remains a critical challenge for privacy-preserving reasoning. In this paper, we propose DistilledPRAG, a generalizable knowledge-distilled parametric RAG model aligned with standard RAG in document structure and parameter activation. We first synthesize QA pairs from single and multi-documents to enhance cross-document reasoning. Then, we mask the plaintext documents with a special token and translate them to LoRA via a parameter generator, maintaining the standard RAG document structure. Finally, guided by synthetic QA data, we train the parameter generator to match standard RAG’s hidden states and output logits, enabling RAG-style reasoning without original documents. Experiments on four QA datasets show that DistilledPRAG outperforms baselines in accuracy and generalizes well on OOD data.

Abstract:
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated strong performance in spoken question answering (QA), with existing evaluations primarily focusing on answer accuracy and robustness to acoustic perturbations. However, such evaluations implicitly assume that spoken inputs remain semantically answerable, an assumption that often fails in real-world interaction when essential information is missing. In this work, we introduce a repair-aware evaluation setting that explicitly distinguishes between answerable and unanswerable audio inputs. We define answerability as a property of the input itself and construct paired evaluation conditions using a semantic-acoustic masking protocol. Based on this setting, we propose the Evaluability Awareness and Repair (EAR) score, a non-compensatory metric that jointly evaluates task competence under answerable conditions and repair behavior under unanswerable conditions. Experiments on two spoken QA benchmarks across diverse LALMs reveal a consistent gap between answer accuracy and conversational reliability: while many models perform well when inputs are answerable, most fail to recognize semantic unanswerability and initiate appropriate conversational repair. These findings expose a limitation of prevailing accuracy-centric evaluation practices and motivate reliability assessments that treat unanswerable inputs as cues for repair and continued interaction. The core code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/sheunghung/EAR .

Abstract:
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at general vision-language tasks, precise coordinate prediction remains a significant challenge, particularly as high-resolution inputs cause visual positional encodings (VPEs) to degrade. We demonstrate that these encoding failures do not result in random noise but instead trigger predictable, directional biases, suggesting that models default to internal spatial priors when grounding signals are weak. To counteract this, we introduce Vision-PE Shuffle Guidance (VPSG), a training-free, inference-time correction method. VPSG isolates position-unconditioned tendencies by shuffling VPEs and utilizes this negative evidence to steer digit decoding through a lightweight finite-state machine. Evaluation on the ScreenSpot-Pro benchmark confirms that VPSG effectively rectifies coordinate drift, yielding consistent improvements in localization accuracy across various model scales without any retraining.

Abstract:
Speculative Decoding (SD) reduces inference latency for Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging an efficient draft model to generate candidate tokens, which are subsequently verified by the target model. To enhance acceleration while reducing the LLM usage costs, we propose Serial and Parallel Intertwined Speculative DEcoding (SPIDE) — a novel training-free SD framework that orchestrates dynamic alternation combining serial dynamic drafting with parallel draft verification. We maintain a confidence-acceptance mapping table during the decoding process. In the serial dynamic drafting module, we leverage this table to evaluate the reliability of the draft sequence and adjust draft lengths adaptively. In the parallel draft verification module, we alleviate drafting-termination conflicts that compromise efficiency, and we update the mapping table synchronously. We conduct experimental evaluations on diverse model pairs and text generation tasks to assess the effectiveness of SPIDE. Compared with autoregressive decoding, SPIDE is speeded up by 3.25× on average and up to 4.56×. Compared with vanilla SD, SPIDE only increases the LLM usage cost by 8.2% on average, but brings an additional 67.7% speedup on average.

Abstract:
Code large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in code debugging by directly generating the correct code based on the buggy code snippet. Programming benchmarks, typically consisting of buggy code snippets and their associated test cases, are used to assess the debugging capabilities of LLMs. However, many existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are often limited in terms of language diversity (e.g., DebugBench and DebugEval). To advancethe field of multilingual debugging with LLMs, we propose the first massively multilingual debugging benchmark, which includes 3.9K test samples of 20 programming languages and covers the automated program repair (APR) task, the bug localization(BL) task, and the bug identification (BI) task. In addition, we introduce the debugging instruction corpora MdEval-Instruct by injecting bugs into the correct multilingual queries and solutions (xDebugGen). Further, a multilingual debugger xDebugCoder trained on MdEval-Instruct as a strong baseline specifically to handle bugs of a wide range of programming languages (e.g. “Missing Mut” in language Rust and “Misused Macro Definition” in language C). Our extensive experiments on MdEval reveal a notable performance gap between open-source and closed-source LLMs (e.g., GPT and Claudeseries), highlighting huge room for improvement in multilingual code debugging scenarios.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts large language models (LLMs) scale efficiently through sparse activation, yet their deployment is fundamentally constrained by the large static parameter footprint of experts. Existing compression approaches either remove entire experts, disrupting routing topology and harming performance, or rely on unstructured weight pruning with limited practical efficiency. To address the limitations, we propose TENP, a structured Trapezoidal Expert Neuron Pruning framework. Using a few samples, we identify and retain important experts, while applying expert neuron pruning (ENP) to less important experts, preserving model parameters in a trapezoidal pattern from shallow to deep layers. When evaluating expert importance, we jointly consider both the magnitude of the expert output and its ability to change the direction of the input vector. For ENP, we measure each neuron’s projected contribution to the expert output to identify and retain important neurons. We conduct extensive experiments on the Qwen and DeepSeek models. Under a routing expert sparsity of 40% and an average of 63.76% activated expert parameters, the DeepSeek model suffers only a 1-point drop in accuracy compared to the full-parameter model. Moreover, it outperforms the full-parameter model by 10% on code generation tasks.

Abstract:
Reliable evaluation is essential for understanding large language model (LLM) performance, yet today’s go-to metrics, namely token-overlap scores (e.g., ROUGE) and embedding-based measures (e.g., BERTScore), often misjudge semantic similarity of documents. Our study shows that both token-overlap metrics and embedding-based metrics routinely assign nearly identical scores to texts that directly contradict each other, thereby potentially masking fundamental errors. We introduce MATCHA, an automatic metric that jointly rewards semantic agreement with a reference and penalizes contradictions. MATCHA employs a dual-view perspective that measures (i) proximity to the gold text and (ii) distance from an adversarially generated counterfactual contradiction. In eight public benchmarks, MATCHA outperforms popular metrics, compared with human annotations on question-answering, image caption generation, natural language inference, summarization, and semantic textual similarity tasks. On the TruthfulQA dataset (i.e., a dataset without a training set, where no embedding-based metrics could locally train on), this improvement in terms of matching texts with a reference reaches 18.38% over ROUGE-L and 20.82% over BERTScore. Both quantitative comparison and qualitative human assessments confirm the efficacy and validity of MATCHA and uncover fundamental weaknesses in pre-existing metrics. Compared with 23 embedding models, including top state-of-the-art ones, used as a metric similar to BERTScore, MATCHA remains the most accurate in distinguishing correct from incorrect statements solely based on a reference. Our code and metric are publicly available (https://github.com/Siran-Li/MATCHA).

Abstract:
We present semantic-pragmatic specification and annotation (ellipsis, coreference, bridging and discourse relations, information structure, scope of negation) in the multi-layer, genre-diversified, 3+ million-token Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 2. 0. While morphology and syntax work almost exclusively on sentence level, the semantic-pragmatic phenomena are often related to two or more neighbouring sentences and possibly to an extra-linguistic context. In the contribution, we describe these phenomena from both the linguistic perspective (form of expression, relation to syntax and morphology) and the cognitive perspective (relation to context, real world knowledge, as well as to the related processes such as thinking or reasoning) – classifying the possible relations between the semantic-pragmatic units into cognitively plausible, distinguishable, and human-understandable categories. We have applied our results to the corpus, by annotating it in its entirety. The resulting dataset is publicly and freely available, to serve for verification and further investigation of (not only) these phenomena.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) as judges across various scenarios such as assessing model responses is becoming an increasingly accepted paradigm. However, existing judgment approaches often rely on trained judgers using fixed preference data, which tend to overlook diverse user preferences and struggle to adapt to real-world human-AI dialogue scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose SenseJudge, a customizable judgment framework driven by human preferences and SenseBench, a diverse and challenging instruction following benchmark derived from real-world multi-turn interactions. We applied the automatic judgment framework and benchmark to two tasks: 1) LLMs as personalized judges, and 2) model ranking. We conducted extensive experiments, and the results demonstrate that the SenseJudge framework surpasses other judgment methods and models in the LLMs-as-personalized-judges task and achieves model ranking that aligns with real human sense. Additionally, we conducted analyses on position bias and consistency, alongside ablation studies, which affirmed the robustness of SenseJudge.

Abstract:
Medical multimodal large language models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes clinical settings, yet current safety evaluations largely overlook a critical failure mode: covert semantic drift that accumulates across clinically plausible multi-turn interactions. Such drift can lead models to gradually exaggerate or conceal critical medical findings without triggering explicit safety mechanisms. We propose MSIA (Medical Semantic Infiltration Attack), a framework for modeling and inducing multi-turn medical semantic jailbreaks in clinical dialogues. MSIA enables the controlled optimization of cumulative semantic drift under stealth constraints through adaptive strategy selection and closed-loop reward feedback grounded in medical evidence. Experiments on chest X-ray–based multimodal medical dialogues show that MSIA consistently outperforms existing jailbreak methods across GPT-4o, Claude, and Gemini, achieving an average attack success rate of 76.67%. These results expose substantial and previously underestimated vulnerabilities of medical LLMs in realistic multi-turn clinical interactions. Code is available here: https://github.com/HeYamo/MSIA.

Abstract:
Autonomous Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents powered by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) enable digital automation on end-user devices. While scaling both parameters and data has yielded substantial gains, advanced methods still suffer from prohibitive deployment costs on resource-constrained devices. When facing complex in-the-wild scenarios, lightweight GUI agents are bottlenecked by limited capacity and poor task scalability under end-to-end episodic learning, impeding multi-agent systems (MAS) adaptation, while training multiple skill-specific experts remains costly. Can we strike an effective trade-off in this cost–scalability dilemma, enabling lightweight MLLMs to participate in realistic GUI workflows? To address these challenges, we propose LAMO framework, which endows a lightweight MLLM with GUI-specific knowledge and task scalability, allowing multi-role orchestration to expand their capability boundary for GUI automation. LAMO combines role-oriented data synthesis with a two-stage training recipe: (i) supervised fine-tuning with Perplexity-Weighted Cross-Entropy optimization for knowledge distillation and visual perception enhancement, and (ii) reinforcement learning for role-oriented cooperative exploration. Via LAMO, we develop a task-scalable native GUI agent LAMO-3B supporting monolithic execution and MAS-style orchestration. When paired with advanced planners, as a plug-and-play policy executor, LAMO-3B can continuously benefit from planner advances, enabling a higher performance ceiling. Extensive static and online evaluations validate the effectiveness of our designs.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a remarkable ability in code generation, yet ensuring the security and functionality of the produced code remains a critical challenge. Existing security code generation methods often rely solely on abstract security knowledge, typically resulting in a suboptimal trade-off: they either produce code with lingering vulnerabilities due to insufficient guidance or sacrifice functionality for the sake of absolute security. To address this limitation, we propose SAFENOTE, a novel framework that integrates a Security Error Notebook and a Function Error Notebook to transform failure experiences into concrete, actionable guidance. This method facilitates a form of contrastive guidance during inference, effectively steering the LLMs away from identified vulnerabilities while preserving functional correctness. Extensive experiment results across five LLMs on CodeGuard+ and LiveCodeBench benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Specifically, SAFENOTE achieves a substantial leap in SP@1 metric, with GPT-4o-mini performance improving from 60.21% to 66.7% on CodeGuard+. Furthermore, SAFENOTE provides security and functional guidance that generalizes effectively to “unseen” CWE scenarios, significantly outperforming existing baselines.

Abstract:
Standard LLM personalization typically frames identity as a static retrieval task, overlooking the inherent incongruity of human personas, where stable traits coexist with atypical, context-specific stances. Existing methods struggle to reconcile these dimensions: prompting succumbs to context drift over long sequences, while fine-tuning often suppresses idiosyncratic “quirks” in favor of generic distributional patterns. To bridge this gap, we present QuirkyMind, a framework that disentangles identity definition from its expression. First, Traits Anchoring constructs a dual-stream latent state, fusing a sentence-level summary for semantic stability with a token-level sequence for generative control. This state is stabilized via In-Context Narrative Refinement using an alternating objective: a discriminative InfoNCE loss anchors the persona in representation space to prevent drift, while a generative cross-entropy loss ensures faithful verbalization. Finally, Persona Steered Generalization transfers the refined state to downstream tasks via parameter-efficient adapters. Empirical evaluations on Persona-Steered QA and Narrative Inference demonstrate that QuirkyMind mitigates drift, consolidating persona knowledge without erasing authentic incongruities.

Abstract:
Neural machine translation for extremely low-resource languages faces compounding challenges: scarce parallel data, orthographic inconsistency, and absence of quality metadata for principled training. We present Kumatigi, a quality-annotated French-Bambara corpus combining systematic curation with data augmentation strategies tailored to Bambara. We provide 67k quality-scored pairs that enable targeted data filtering and address pervasive orthographic normalization issues in existing resources. Our dual-dataset generation framework strategically exploits round-trip translation, producing synthetic pairs for fluency reinforcement alongside back-translated pairs that preserve authentic vocabulary for coverage expansion. We further introduce linguistically-motivated augmentation techniques addressing Bambara’s orthographic variability, improving model robustness for real-world text. Experiments with LoRA-based fine-tuning demonstrate consistent improvements across automatic metrics, with our full system achieving up to +3–4 BLEU over strong baselines. Data generation and augmentation strategies contribute +1-2 BLEU beyond high-quality parallel data alone. Human evaluation by native speakers confirms these automatic improvements align with substantial gains in translation adequacy and fluency, with our best model approaching human reference translation quality. Our methodology provides a reproducible framework applicable to other under-resourced languages facing similar data challenges.

Abstract:
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) still covers only a small fraction of the world’s languages, mainly due to supervised data scarcity. In-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) addresses this problem, but prior work largely focuses on high-resource languages covered during training and text-only settings. This paper investigates whether speech LLMs can learn unseen languages with multimodal ICL (MICL), and how this learning can be used to improve ASR. We conduct experiments with two speech LLMs, Phi-4 and Qwen3-Omni, on three diverse endangered languages. Firstly, we find that MICL is effective for unseen languages, leveraging both speech and text modalities. We further show that cross-lingual transfer learning improves MICL efficiency on target languages without training on them. Moreover, we analyze attention patterns to interpret MICL mechanisms, and we observe layer-dependent preferences between audio and text context, with an overall bias towards text. Finally, we show that prompt-based ASR with speech LLMs performs poorly on unseen languages, motivating a simple ASR system that combines a stronger acoustic model with a speech LLM via MICL-based selection of acoustic hypotheses. Results show that MICL consistently improves ASR performance, and that cross-lingual transfer learning matches or outperforms corpus-trained language models without using target-language data. Our code is publicly available

Abstract:
Large reasoning models exhibit long chain-of-thought reasoning with complex strategies such as backtracking and self-verification. Yet, these capabilities typically require resource-intensive post-training. We investigate whether such behaviors can be elicited in large models without any gradient updates. To this end, we propose a decoding-time approach, ThinkLogit, which utilizes logit arithmetic to transfer these capabilities from a substantially smaller reasoning guider to a large non-reasoning target. We further show that we can boost performance by training the guider to correct the target’s errors using preference optimization over mixed model outputs, a setup we refer to as ThinkLogit-DPO. We evaluate these methods across six reasoning benchmarks spanning math, science, and coding domains using the Qwen2.5-32B guided by R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B, a model 21x smaller. Our experiments demonstrate that ThinkLogit and ThinkLogit-DPO achieve a relative improvement of 21.5% and 24.2%, respectively, over the target model. Moreover, ThinkLogit remains effective even when the guider and target come from different model families.Crucially, our method requires zero training for the large model and would incur minimal inference overhead when logits are computed in parallel, presenting a practical solution for enabling long reasoning at scale.

Abstract:
On-policy distillation (OPD), which samples trajectories from the student model and supervises them with a teacher at the token-level, avoids relying solely on verifiable terminal rewards and can yield better generalization than off-policy distillation. However, OPD requires expensive on-the-fly sampling of the student policy during training, which substantially increases training cost, especially for responses with long reasoning traces. Our initial analysis shows that, during OPD, training signals are stronger in the prefix of each output reasoning trace, and that even a short teacher-generated prefix can significantly help the student produce the correct answer. Motivated by these observations, we propose a simple yet effective modification of OPD: we apply the distillation objective only to prefixes of student-generated outputs and terminate each sampling early during distillation. Experiments on a suite of AI-for-Math and out-of-domain reasoning benchmarks show that on-policy prefix distillation matches the performance of full OPD in long reasoning outputs while reducing training FLOP by 2x–40x.

Abstract:
While confidence estimation is a promising direction for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), current research overwhelmingly focuses on single-turn settings. The dynamics of model confidence in multi-turn conversations, where context accumulates and ambiguity is progressively resolved, remain largely unexplored. This work presents the first systematic study of confidence estimation in multi-turn interactions, establishing a formal evaluation framework grounded in two key desiderata: per-turn calibration and monotonicity of confidence as more information becomes available. To facilitate this, we introduce novel metrics, including a length-normalized Expected Calibration Error (InfoECE), and a new "Hinter-Guesser" paradigm for generating controlled evaluation datasets. Our experiments reveal that widely-used confidence techniques struggle with calibration and monotonicity in multi-turn dialogues. In contrast, a novel logit-based probe we introduce, P(Sufficient), proves comparatively more effective, robustly tracking evidence accumulation and distinguishing it from conversational filler. Our work provides a foundational methodology for developing more reliable and trustworthy conversational agents.

Abstract:
Zero-shot ASR for Arabic remains challenging: while multilingual models perform well on Modern Standard Arabic (MSA), error rates rise sharply on dialectal and accented speech due to linguistic mismatch and scarce labeled data. We study context-aware decoding as a lightweight test-time adaptation paradigm that conditions inference on external side information without parameter updates. For promptable encoder–decoder ASR (e.g., Whisper), we incorporate context through (i) decoder prompting with first-pass hypotheses and (ii) encoder/decoder prefixing with retrieved speech-text exemplars, complemented by simple prompt reordering and optional speaker-matched synthetic exemplars to improve robustness in informal and multi-speaker settings. To extend contextual adaptation beyond promptable architectures, we introduce proxy-guided n-best selection for CTC ASR: given one or more external proxy hypotheses, we select from a model’s n -best list by minimizing text-level distance to the proxies, enabling contextual inference without direct prompting. Across ten Arabic conditions spanning MSA, accented MSA, and multiple dialects, the best-performing context-aware variants yield average relative WER reductions of 22.29% on MSA, 20.54% on accented MSA, and 9.15% on dialectal Arabic. For CTC ASR on our Common Voice MSA testbed, proxy-guided selection reduces WER by 15.6% relative and recovers a substantial fraction of oracle n -best gains, showing that external-context guidance can also benefit non-promptable ASR.

Abstract:
We propose Concept Tokens, a lightweight method that adds a new special token to a pretrained LLM and learns only its embedding from multiple natural language definitions of a target concept, where occurrences of the concept are replaced by the new token. The LLM is kept frozen and the embedding is optimized with the standard language-modeling objective. We evaluate Concept Tokens in three settings. First, we study hallucinations in closed-book question answering on HotpotQA and find a directional effect: negating the hallucination token reduces hallucinated answers mainly by increasing abstentions, whereas asserting it increases hallucinations and lowers precision. Second, we induce recasting, a pedagogical feedback strategy for second language teaching, and observe the same directional effect. Moreover, compared to providing the full definitional corpus in-context, concept tokens better preserve compliance with other instructions (e.g., asking follow-up questions). Finally, we include a qualitative study with the Eiffel Tower and a fictional “Austral Tower” to illustrate what information the learned embeddings capture and where their limitations emerge. Overall, Concept Tokens provide a compact control signal learned from definitions that can steer behavior in frozen LLMs.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently hallucinate, limiting their safe deployment in real-world applications. Existing LLM self-evaluation methods rely on a model’s ability to estimate the correctness of its own outputs, which can improve deployment reliability; however, they depend heavily on language priors and are therefore ill-suited for evaluating vision-conditioned predictions. We propose VAUQ, a vision-aware uncertainty quantification framework for LVLM self-evaluation that explicitly measures how strongly a model’s output depends on visual evidence. VAUQ introduces the Image-Information Score (IS), which captures the reduction in predictive uncertainty attributable to visual input, and an unsupervised core-region masking strategy that amplifies the influence of salient regions. Combining predictive entropy with this core-masked IS yields a training-free scoring function that reliably reflects answer correctness. Comprehensive experiments show that VAUQ consistently outperforms existing self-evaluation methods across multiple datasets.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents represent a paradigm shift in AI, enabling autonomous systems to plan, reason, and use tools while interacting with dynamic environments. This paper provides the first comprehensive survey of evaluation methods for these increasingly capable agents. We analyze the field of agent evaluation across five perspectives: (1) Core LLM capabilities needed for agentic workflows, like planning, and tool use; (2) Application-specific benchmarks such as web and SWE agents; (3) Evaluation of generalist agents; (4) Analysis of agent benchmarks’ core dimensions; and (5) Evaluation frameworks and tools for agent developers. Our analysis reveals current trends, including a shift toward more realistic, challenging evaluations with continuously updated benchmarks. We also identify critical gaps that future research must address—particularly in assessing cost-efficiency, safety, and robustness, and in developing fine-grained, scalable evaluation methods.

Abstract:
A prevalent approach to interpretable representation learning involves creating a mask that weights the significance of each input feature, followed by deriving a masked representation by applying this mask to the input representation. However, the identifiability of these learned masked representations is often uncertain, making the origin of these representations ambiguous or unreliable. Furthermore, the approaches to interpreting Transformer based on attention weights have been criticized for their faithfulness. To address these limitations, we propose a novel causal framework that directly learns identifiable and explainable representations from attention weights, rather than relying on importance masks. Our framework leverages identifiability theory and causal representation learning to extract explainable representations within a subspace of input representations, effectively transforming frozen representation learning methods into self-explaining systems. Experimental results on real-world datasets demonstrate that, compared to well-established state-of-the-art methods, our approach provides identifiable and more trustworthy explanations while guaranteeing faithfulness.

Abstract:
Automated negotiation in complex, multi-party and multi-issue settings critically depends on accurate opponent modeling. However, conventional numerical-only approaches fail to capture the qualitative information embedded in natural language interactions, resulting in unstable and incomplete preference estimation. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) enable rich semantic understanding of utterances, it remains challenging to quantitatively incorporate such information into a consistent opponent modeling. To tackle this issue, we propose a novel preference estimation method integrating natural language information into a structured Bayesian opponent modeling framework. Our approach leverages LLMs to extract qualitative cues from utterances and converts them into probabilistic formats for dynamic belief tracking. Experimental results on a multi-party benchmark demonstrate that our framework improves the full agreement rate and preference estimation accuracy by integrating probabilistic reasoning with natural language understanding.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, but their performance often degrades under distribution shift. Existing test-time adaptation (TTA) methods rely on gradient-based updates that require white-box access and need substantial overhead, while training-free alternatives are either static or depend on external guidance. In this paper, we propose Training-Free Test-Time Contrastive Learning (TF-TTCL), a training-free adaptation framework that enables a frozen LLM to improve online by distilling supervision from its own inference experiences. Specifically, TF-TTCL implements a dynamic "Explore-Reflect-Steer" loop through three core modules: 1) Semantic Query Augmentation first diversifies problem views via multi-agent role-playing to generate different reasoning trajectories; 2) Contrastive Experience Distillation then captures the semantic gap between superior and inferior trajectories, distilling them into explicit textual rules; and 3) Contextual Rule Retrieval finally activates these stored rules during inference to dynamically steer the frozen LLM toward robust reasoning patterns while avoiding observed errors. Extensive experiments on closed-ended reasoning tasks and open-ended evaluation tasks demonstrate that TF-TTCL consistently outperforms strong zero-shot baselines and representative TTA methods under online evaluation. Code is available at https://github.com/KevinSCUTer/TF-TTCL.

Abstract:
With the advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), building GUI agent systems has become an increasingly promising direction—especially for mobile platforms, given their rich app ecosystems and intuitive touch interactions. Yet mobile GUI agents face a critical dilemma: truly on-device models (4B or smaller) lack sufficient performance, while capable models (starting from 7B) are either too large for mobile deployment or prohibitively costly (e.g., cloud-only closed-source MLLMs). To resolve this, we propose OpenPhone, a mobile GUI agent system that leverages device-cloud collaboration to tap the cost-efficiency of on-device models and the high capability of cloud models, while avoiding their drawbacks. Specifically, OpenPhone enhances Qwen2.5-VL-3B via two-stage SFT→GRPO training on synthetic GUI data for strong decision-making, integrates an efficient long-reasoning mechanism to utilize historical interactions under tight resources, and defaults to on-device execution—only escalating challenging subtasks to the cloud via real-time complexity assessment. Experiments on the online AndroidLab benchmark and diverse apps show OpenPhone matches or nears larger models, with a significant reduction in cloud costs.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have emerged as an effective approach for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a subset of experts during inference. Despite their computational efficiency, MoE models incur a substantial memory bottleneck from maintaining all expert parameters during inference. To address this challenge, numerous MoE pruning methods have been proposed. However, most existing methods adopt uniform pruning across layers, which fails to capture layer-wise variations in expert importance and redundancy. In this paper, we propose COmpensated MoE Pruning with Expert-Layer distribution (COMPEL). COMPEL performs layer-adaptive expert pruning by estimating expert importance using Fisher information and deriving layer importance from layer-wise outlier distributions, enabling pruning decisions that capture layer-wise heterogeneity. Furthermore, to mitigate performance degradation resulting from expert pruning, we propose a Fisher information guided expert weight compensation method. Experimental results on the Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B achieve near lossless performance at 25% expert pruning and maintains performance within a 4% margin even at 50% pruning. Moreover, COMPEL consistently outperforms existing pruning methods while substantially reducing inference latency and peak GPU memory usage.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) are deployed globally, ensuring their safety and alignment across multiple languages becomes paramount. However, safety behaviors often vary unpredictably between languages, posing significant challenges for consistent and ethical AI. In this work, we systematically investigate the dynamics of multilingual alignment, exploring whether single-language alignment transfers cross-lingually, how language consistency is preserved during training, and the resulting trade-offs with general knowledge capabilities. We introduce RefusEU a novel refusal alignment dataset covering 12 European languages, including a dedicated test set for evaluating current state-of-the-art models. Our controlled Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) experiments provide two key insights: aligning models exclusively in English is insufficient to ensure cross-lingual safety, even for the same harm categories, whereas training on multilingual datasets can improve safety without degrading general performance, as measured by the Global MMLU benchmark.

Abstract:
Autonomous LLM agents are increasingly deployed in complex environments as tool-using systems. However, their safety remains fragile, as minor reasoning or retrieval errors can be amplified into hazardous actions within the agentic workflow. Existing defenses, often limited to static prompts or post-hoc guardrails, fail to provide runtime intervention or cross-architecture portability. In this paper, we propose Safety Sidecar , a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module designed to provide standardized runtime safety control and auditability for arbitrary agent workflows. Safety Sidecar operationalizes reflection as a closed-loop controller: it dynamically monitors decision traces, retrieves evidence-based repair exemplars from a reflective memory, and enforces risk-mitigating revisions before execution. Crucially, it employs external verifiers to gate both action release and memory updates, producing a transparent, auditable trail of retrieved evidence and applied constraints.We instantiate and systematically evaluate Safety Sidecar in secure code generation—a high-stakes domain with objective vulnerability signals. Experimental results across eight CWE scenarios and four representative LLMs demonstrate that Safety Sidecar consistently improves the secure-solution rate by 2.9–11.2 percentage points while maintaining competitive functional correctness. Efficiency analysis shows the framework is practical for deployment, with reflection adding only 3.2s to end-to-end latency and a negligible average cost of 5.37 × 10 -4 per scenario. Our findings position Safety Sidecar as a portable and efficient control layer for enhancing the safety, compliance, and auditability of LLM-based agents.

Abstract:
Large language models have recently advanced automated program repair, yet most existing approaches provide only post-hoc natural-language explanations that are neither executable nor verifiable. This limitation is especially critical for quantum programs, where correctness hinges on subtle semantic properties such as circuit equivalence and fidelity preservation. We propose Explainable Quantum Program Repair, a framework that couples repair generation with machine-checkable executable explanations. Given a buggy quantum circuit, a language model proposes candidate repairs together with structured transformation rationales, which are compiled into proof traces and validated using formal verification backends, including circuit equivalence checking, ZX-calculus reasoning, stabilizer analysis, and quantum simulation. Only repairs whose explanations are fully verified are accepted. Experiments on QASMBench with mutation-generated quantum program bugs demonstrate that our approach achieves competitive repair success while substantially improving semantic precision and explanation faithfulness over baselines that rely on unconstrained or purely natural-language explanations.

Abstract:
As high-quality data becomes harder to obtain, reward models are increasingly important. Beyond the costly RLHF stage, they are now used at inference time to guide LLM generation and in data selection for post-training. These methods bring efficiency and performance gains, but current reward models often fail to prevent untrustworthy behaviors such as privacy leaks and stereotypes. Re-training reward models to address these issues is expensive, since it requires large-scale human preference data. We propose SelfRW, a lightweight intrinsic reward that needs no extra fine-tuning or auxiliary models. By pruning current LLMs to approximate an “trust” and an “untrust” token distribution, we compute the log-probability difference as an auxiliary reward. When integrated into reward-guided sampling, SelfRW significantly reduces untrustworthy outputs while preserving task performance. It also improves reward-guided data selection, yielding better post-trained models. Experiments with two reward models and four LLMs on privacy, bias, and stereotype benchmarks show that combining SelfRW consistently improves trustworthiness (over 10% in privacy tasks and 20% in bias tasks) with minimal impact on general utility benchmarks.

Abstract:
This study demonstrates an alignment of per-word processing time in a popular state-space language model Mamba and human readers. In Mamba, the recurrent state transition at each layer conceptually takes some duration of time, the discretization timestep 𝛥 t , determined dynamically in response to the input. Using a naturalistic reading dataset, we show that the per-word timestep from Mamba is a powerful predictor of human reading times, comparable to strong baselines such as word frequency and GPT-2 surprisal and significant even when they are controlled for. We further suggest, through formal analysis of Mamba’s architecture and internal dynamics, that Mamba can serve as a new, valuable lens to look at human real-time language processing with ever-updated memory, because it allows us to look at how each module (layer) weighs short- and long-term information retention, and how noise may interact with dynamic, continuous memory representation. Code is available via an (anonymized) link.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong generalization across multimodal tasks, but their capacity to handle sign language translation (SLT), which requires fine-grained spatiotemporal reasoning and linguistic understanding, remains unclear. In this study, we evaluate whether small VLMs (with ≤ 3B parameters) can perform SLT effectively. We perform supervised fine-tuning on four publicly available multilingual SLT datasets, including one German (DGS), two American (ASL), and one Indian (ISL), applying parameter-efficient LoRA to the language decoder while keeping the vision encoder frozen and training only the connector. To evaluate translation quality, we propose entity- and semantics-aware metrics tailored for SLT. We highlight the data imbalance issues present in the above widely used SLT datasets. Our analysis highlights the limitations in applying general-purpose VLMs to SLT, unlike their applicability in other tasks, and provides insights to inform future development of VLMs for SLP, which is essential for building inclusive AI applications.

Abstract:
The evolving realism of AI-generated Videos (AIGC-V) is rapidly rendering traditional artifact-centric detection insufficient, necessitating a paradigm shift from low-level inspection to high-level semantic verification. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of AIGC-V detection, reframing the task as Factual Fidelity Verification, which asks whether the events, entities, and physical processes depicted in a video are consistent with real-world facts. To systematize this rapidly evolving field, we propose a Vision–Language Dual-View taxonomy that organizes existing methods into a hierarchical, four-layer landscape, spanning intrinsic cue analysis, spatiotemporal consistency modeling, cross-modal consistency reasoning, and language-guided world-level reasoning. This dual-view framing highlights a fundamental transition from artifact matching to evidence-based semantic verification enabled by vision–language models and agentic reasoning pipelines. Based on a systematic review of 195 papers, we synthesize AIGC-V generation paradigms, survey the landscape of detection methods, and review evaluation metrics and benchmarks in line with proposed views. Finally, we discuss current challenges and identify promising directions toward robust, explainable, and trustworthy detection.

Abstract:
Training effective AI agents for real-world tool-use interactions requires data that faithfully captures the dynamics of human–agent collaboration. However, such data is scarce, and existing methods often resort to synthetic data generation. The inherently dynamic and complex nature of user–agent interactions makes ensuring data quality particularly challenging. Current verification approaches are typically entangled with the synthesis process itself, resulting in complicated implementations that undermine both reproducibility and scalability. To address this, we introduce Tool-Verifier-7B, a plug-and-play framework for data quality control in tool-use scenarios. Building on this verifier and our data synthesis strategy, we construct the Tool-Verify dataset, which contains 3,295 curated samples. To directly assess verifier performance, we further release Tool-V-Bench, a benchmark of 165 human-validated trajectories spanning diverse interaction complexities. Comprehensive experiments show that Tool-Verifier-7B surpasses Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct on Tool-V-Bench. Moreover, the Tool-Verify dataset achieves superior performance compared to the previous APIGen-MT dataset.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tool use, but their ability to follow user preferences when calling tools remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce APOLLO, a benchmark designed to evaluate agents’ ability to identify personalized user preferences from interaction histories and to adhere to these preferences when calling tools to solve user queries. In APOLLO, user preferences expressed in the interaction history take two forms: explicit preferences stated directly, and implicit preferences conveyed through behaviors such as option selection and comparison. In addition, the benchmark includes two types of queries, reactive and proactive, which pose challenges for LLMs to ground user queries in the corresponding preferences. Using APOLLO, we evaluate and analyze both language models and reasoning models, and investigate the impact of different agent frameworks, such as Reflexion, on model performance. Experimental results show that current models still struggle to follow user preferences when calling tools. For instance, GPT-4o achieves only 51.16% accuracy on the benchmark. Furthermore, we develop a reinforcement learning-based approach to improve LLMs, achieving substantial performance gains on APOLLO. Our dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/zhiyuanc2001/APOLLO.

Abstract:
Function calling agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) select external tools to automate complex tasks. On-device agents typically use a retrieval module to select relevant tools, improving performance and reducing context length. However, existing retrieval methods rely on static and limited inputs, failing to capture multi-step tool dependencies and evolving task context. This limitation often introduces irrelevant tools that mislead the agent, degrading efficiency and accuracy. We propose Dynamic Tool Dependency Retrieval (DTDR), a lightweight retrieval method that conditions on both the initial query and the evolving tool calling plan. DTDR models tool dependencies from function calling demonstrations, enabling adaptive retrieval as plans unfold. We benchmark DTDR against state-of-the-art retrieval methods across multiple datasets and LLM backbones, evaluating retrieval precision, downstream task accuracy, and computational efficiency. Additionally, we explore strategies to integrate retrieved tools into prompts. Our results show that DTDR improves function calling success rates between 23% and 104% compared to state-of-the-art static retrievers.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in monetization-driven systems such as search engines, advertising platforms, and e-commerce services, where decision making is shaped by complex interactions among user intent, advertiser objectives, and platform constraints. Despite rapid progress, existing benchmarks primarily focus on shopping-centric scenarios and user-facing data, capturing only a limited subset of real-world monetization pipelines and overlooking intermediate decision stages and robustness considerations. In this work, we introduce MonBench, a high-quality multi-task benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs in realistic monetization contexts. The benchmark is constructed from large-scale production data collected from multiple search engines, including both intermediate candidate pools and user-visible outcomes, better reflecting the distributional characteristics of real monetization systems. MonBench covers key capability dimensions such as intent understanding, commercial matching, and user behavior modeling, and adopts a unified multiple-choice formulation to enable systematic comparison across models. We further propose a comprehensive evaluation protocol that measures both performance and robustness. We evaluate a diverse set of state-of-the-art LLMs and conduct detailed task-level analyses. Our results reveal monetization-specific behaviors, including gaps between relevance optimization and broader decision-making capabilities, as well as differences in robustness across model families. These findings provide new insights into the strengths and limitations of current LLMs and highlight the need for richer domain-specific supervision in monetization-oriented applications.

Abstract:
Speakers of under-represented languages face both a language barrier, as most online knowledge is in a few dominant languages, and a modality barrier, since information is largely text-based while many languages are primarily oral. We address this for French-Wolof by training the first bilingual speech-text Matryoshka embedding model, enabling efficient retrieval of French text from Wolof speech queries without relying on a costly ASR-translation pipelines. We introduce large-scale data curation pipelines and new benchmarks, compare modeling strategies, and show that modality fusion within a frozen text Matryoshka model performs best. Although trained only for retrieval, the model generalizes well to other tasks, such as speech intent detection, indicating the learning of general semantic representations. Finally, we analyze cost-accuracy trade-offs across Matryoshka dimensions and ranks, showing that information is concentrated only in a few components, suggesting potential for efficiency improvements.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are often deployed in tasks that require selecting an item from a long list provided in the model’s context. LLMs’ native selection behavior is brittle: predictions are sensitive to the surface form of the identifiers, their placement within the context, and the ordering of candidate items. We present OLR-Heads, a robust method for list selection that harnesses attention patterns available from a single forward call on the LLM. OLR-Heads learns the logic for item selection using a few in-context examples, and a simple online position-debiasing mechanism to correct attention distortion. Across multiple database and tool selection benchmarks, OLR-Heads consistently improves selection performance over direct generation and prior attention-based methods, while remaining robust to prompt variations and item ordering.The LLM’s KV cache states are unaffected, and can be reused for subsequent response generation. In contrast, existing approaches either entail additional LLM calls, or task-specific offline learning, or position debiasing methods that modify the attention or encoding rendering the KV states unusable for subsequent generation.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) excel at factual recall, they can still propagate stale or incorrect knowledge, making in-context knowledge editing a gradient-free remedy suitable for black-box APIs. These knowledge editors that use in-context learning typically rely on a single retriever and surface-similarity heuristics to build prompts. However, a key observation in this study is that retrievers can be complementary: semantic rankers may recover paraphrased evidence, while lexical or feature-based retrievers may preserve precise entities and cues. This creates two gaps in single-retriever editors: they (i) miss complementary evidence that different retrievers surface and (ii) cannot adapt when one retriever is clearly more reliable for a query. We introduce a Feature-Weighted Ensemble for In-context Knowledge Editing (FWE-IKE) that calibrates three heterogeneous rankers (LLM-, BERT-, and MLP-based), extracts simple confidence features from each ranker, predicts per-query mixture weights, and applies a conservative margin-based routing gate that selects a single expert when confident; otherwise we mix calibrated distributions with learned per-query weights. On the CounterFact benchmark, FWE-IKE attains 88.33% Edit-Success Rate, a +3.0 point gain over the best single retriever and approaching the oracle upper bound (91%). Case studies, an ablation study, and analyses show the method systematically recovers complementary wins (e.g., BERT-only, LLM-only, MLP-only slices). FWE-IKE improves edit accuracy without touching model weights and provides a practical path to more robust, confidence-aware retrieval for IKE.

Abstract:
While scaling test-time compute can substantially improve model performance, existing approaches either rely on static compute allocation or sample from fixed generation distributions.In this work, we introduce a test-time compute allocation framework that jointly adapts where computation is spent and how generation is performed. Our method begins with a warm-up phase that identifies easy queries and assembles an initial pool of question-response pairs from the test set itself. An adaptive phase then concentrates further computation on unresolved queries while reshaping their generation distributions through evolving in-context demonstrations—conditioning each generation on successful responses from semantically related queries rather than resampling from a fixed distribution.Experiments across math, coding, and reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms existing baselines while consuming substantially less inference-time compute.

Abstract:
Conversational AI is constrained in many real-world settings where only one side of a dialogue can be recorded. We formalize the one-sided conversation problem (1SC): inferring and learning from only one side of a conversation. We study two tasks: (1) reconstructing the missing speaker’s turns and (2) generating summaries from one-sided transcripts. Evaluating models on MultiWOZ, DailyDialog, SpokenWOZ and Candor with both human A/B testing and LLM-as-a-judge metrics, we find that additional context improves reconstruction, and while large models generate promising reconstructions with prompting, smaller models require finetuning. Further, high-quality summaries can be generated without reconstructing missing turns. We present 1SC as a novel challenge and report promising results that mark a step toward privacy-aware conversational AI.

Abstract:
The generation of high-fidelity synthetic data is a cornerstone of modern machine learning, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently suffer from hallucinations, logical inconsistencies, and mode collapse when tasked with structured generation. Existing approaches, such s prompting or retrieval-augmented generaon, lack the mechanisms to balance linguistic expressivity with formal guarantees regarding validity and coverage. To address this, we propose CircuitSynth, a novel neuro-symbolic framework that decouples semantic reasoning from surface realization. By distilling the reasoning capabilities of a Teacher LLM into a Probabilistic Sentential Decision Diagram (PSDD), CircuitSynth creates a tractable semantic prior that structurally enforces hard logical constraints. Furthermore, we introduce a convex optimization mechanism to rigorously satisfy soft distributional goals. Empirical evaluations across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that CircuitSynth achieves 100% Schema Validity even in complex logic puzzles where unconstrained baselines fail (12.4%) while significantly outperforming state-of-the-art methods in rare-combination coverage.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer a promising alternative to autoregressive models, but their practical utility is severely hampered by slow, iterative sampling. We present SchED, a training-free, model-agnostic early-exit algorithm that terminates diffusion decoding using a progress-aware confidence threshold. We evaluate SchED across multiple diffusion model families and a diverse set of benchmarks spanning multiple-choice, math, long-form QA, and translation. SchED delivers substantial acceleration: on instruction-tuned models, it achieves approximately 4× speedups while retaining baseline performance on average. On base models, SchED yields consistent speedup gains with 99.1–100% performance retention, with up to 2.34× under more aggressive settings. Under a conservative quality–penalized speed metric, SchED consistently outperforms prior confidence-based early-exit methods, including on long-form generation where existing approaches tend to break down. An entropy analysis of the model’s token predictions reveals that instruction tuning speeds up the decay of predictive entropy. By leveraging inherent confidence stabilization as a signal for computational efficiency, SchED provides a robust framework for efficient dLLM inference.

Abstract:
We reformulate explanation quality assessment as a ranking problem rather than a generation problem. Instead of optimizing models to produce a single “best” explanation token-by-token, we train reward models to discriminate among multiple candidate explanations and learn their relative quality. Concretely, we construct per-instance candidate sets with graded quality levels and train listwise and pairwise ranking models (ListNet, LambdaRank, RankNet) to preserve ordinal structure and avoid score compression typical of pointwise regression or binary preference objectives. We observe three findings: First, ranking losses consistently outperform regression on score separation across all domains tested. Second, the optimal ranking loss depends on data characteristics: listwise objectives excel with well-separated quality tiers, while pairwise methods are more robust to noisy natural annotations. Third, when trained on carefully curated and well-structured data, small encoder models can match models that are orders of magnitude larger, suggesting that data quality matters more than model scale. Finally, when used as rewards in policy optimization, ranking-based scores enable stable convergence in settings where regression-based rewards fail entirely. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/Tankiit/PPO_Learning_to_rank

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SD) improves LLM inference latency by speculatively generating multiple tokens with a small draft model and verifying them with a larger target model. However, when speculation accuracy is low, the overhead from rejected tokens can negate its benefits, especially at large batch sizes.We propose Speculative Verification (SV), an efficient augmentation to SD that predicts speculation accuracy and dynamically adapts the verification length to maximize throughput. SV introduces a small companion model, similar in size to draft model, to reduce uncertainty in speculation accuracy. By exploiting the information gain from observing the companion distribution, SV reduces wasted verification on rejected tokens and improves decoding efficiency.We evaluate SV across publicly available LLMs on seven NLP tasks using over a hundred combinations of draft, companion, and target models, including 13B–72B target models spanning base, instruction-tuned, and task-specific fine-tuned variants. Compared to target-only decoding, standard SD, and state-of-the-art SD variants, SV consistently delivers higher throughput across batch sizes. SV improves SD performance by up to 1.9 × , with an average 1.4 × speedup at large batch sizes, showing robust and scalable gains for practical LLM inference.

Abstract:
While the automatic evaluation of omni-modal large models (OLMs) is essential, assessing empathy remains a significant challenge due to its inherent affectivity. To investigate this challenge, we introduce AEQ-Bench (Audio Empathy Quotient Benchmark), a novel benchmark to systematically assess two core empathetic capabilities of OLMs: (i) generating empathetic responses by comprehending affective cues from multi-modal inputs (audio + text), and (ii) judging the empathy of audio responses without relying on text transcription. Compared to existing benchmarks, AEQ-Bench incorporates two novel settings that vary in context specificity and speech tone. Comprehensive assessment across linguistic and paralinguistic metrics reveals that (1) OLMs trained with audio output capabilities generally outperformed models with text-only outputs, and (2) while OLMs align with human judgments for coarse-grained quality assessment, they remain unreliable for evaluating fine-grained paralinguistic expressiveness.

Abstract:
Muon has recently shown promising results in LLM training. In this work, we study how to further improve Muon. We argue that Muon’s orthogonalized update rule suppresses the emergence of heavy-tailed weight spectra and over-emphasizes the training along noise-dominated directions. Motivated by the Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory, we propose HTMuon. HTMuon preserves Muon’s ability to capture parameter interdependencies while producing heavier-tailed updates and inducing heavier-tailed weight spectra. Experiments on LLM pretraining and image classification show that HTMuon consistently improves performance over state-of-the-art baselines and can also serve as a plug-in on top of existing Muon variants. For example, on LLaMA pretraining on the C4 dataset, HTMuon reduces perplexity by up to 0.98 compared to Muon. We further theoretically show that HTMuon corresponds to steepest descent under the Schatten- q norm constraint and provide convergence analysis in smooth non-convex settings. The implementation of HTMuon is available at https://github.com/TDCSZ327/HTmuon .

Abstract:
The recent surge of interest in unified Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has catalyzed rapid progress toward general-purpose generation and understanding across different modalities. Despite the remarkable advancements, the field lacks a systematic and cohesive framework that connects these developments, revisits the motivations, and situates current trends within a broader landscape. In this survey, we present a comprehensive and in-depth review of unified MLLMs, offering both a methodology taxonomy and unique perspectives on the field. We begin by outlining the foundational concepts and prerequisites for understanding unified MLLMs. We then delve into designs from different aspects, including model architectures, loss functions, alignment techniques, and different representation strategies. Furthermore, we discuss persistent challenges and identify promising directions for future research. By bridging scattered progress and providing a consolidated view, this survey aims to foster a deeper and systematical understanding of unified MLLMs and inspire future innovations in building truly general multimodal intelligence.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly mediate decisions in domains where unfair treatment of demographic groups is unacceptable. Existing work probes when biased outputs appear, but gives little insight into the mechanisms that generate them, leaving existing mitigations largely fragile. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation of LLM unfairness and propose DiffHeads—a lightweight debiasing framework for LLMs. We first compare Direct-Answer (DA) prompting to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting across eight representative open- and closed-source LLMs. DA will trigger the nature-bias component of the LLM and reduce measured unfairness by 391.9%- 534.5% in both one- and two-turn dialogues. Next, we define a token-to-head contribution score that traces each token’s influence back to individual attention heads. This reveals a small cluster of bias heads that activate under DA but stay largely dormant with CoT, providing the first causal link between prompting strategy and bias emergence. Finally, building on this insight, we propose DiffHeads, which identify bias heads through differential activation analysis between DA and CoT and selectively mask only those heads. DiffHeads reduces unfairness by 49.4%, and 40.3% under DA and CoT, respectively, without harming model utility.

Abstract:
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are commonly used to improve reasoning diversity and robustness by simulating interactions among agents with distinct roles. However, prior work often entangles the contribution of the multi-agent architecture with that of prompt conditioning, making the source of observed diversity gains unclear. We address this confound with a controlled study on divergent thinking tasks, using identical prompt conditioning for MAS and single agent baseline. Under these matched conditions, single agent setups consistently outperform multi-agent systems in semantic diversity. We attribute this gap to information visibility: parallel agents often converge on overlapping ideas, whereas a single agent model can condition on its own generation to avoid redundancy. We further find that a Multi-Output strategy, which prompts a single agent to produce multiple responses within a single inference pass, achieves the highest diversity without degrading logical validity. Together, these results point to a more efficient and effective way to expand diversity, with implications for the design of more efficient agentic frameworks.

Abstract:
The escalating demand for comprehensive literature surveys in rapidly evolving research areas makes manual writing increasingly impractical, underscoring the necessity of automation. Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a promising foundation for this task, yet guiding them to generate accurate, reliable content remains a fundamental challenge, as issues such as hallucinations and vague organization often persist. To address this, we propose FIKSurvey, a feedback-driven framework grounded in the idea that “Feedback is the key for automatic survey generation.” Specifically, FIKSurvey systematically incorporates feedback across three dimensions: outline feedback for structural clarity, citation feedback for evidence validation, and content feedback for readability and analytical depth. The framework also supports optional human-in-the-loop intervention for user-specific needs. Experiments confirm that FIKSurvey substantially improves both citation and content quality, demonstrating feedback as the critical mechanism for automatic survey generation.

Abstract:
Context-grounded hallucinations are cases where model outputs contain information not verifiable against the source text. We study the applicability of LLMs for localizing such hallucinations, as a more practical alternative to existing complex evaluation pipelines. In the absence of established benchmarks for meta-evaluation of hallucinations localization, we construct one tailored to LLMs, involving a challenging human annotation of over 1,000 examples. We complement the benchmark with an LLM-based evaluation protocol, verifying its quality in a human evaluation. Since existing representations of hallucinations limit the types of errors that can be expressed, we propose a new representation based on free-form textual descriptions, capturing the full range of possible errors. We conduct a comprehensive study, evaluating four large-scale LLMs, which highlights the benchmark’s difficulty, as the best model achieves an F1 score of only 0.67. Through careful analysis, we offer insights into optimal prompting strategies for the task and identify the main factors that make it challenging for LLMs: (1) a tendency to incorrectly flag missing details as inconsistent, despite being instructed to check only facts in the output; and (2) difficulty with outputs containing factually correct information absent from the source - and thus not verifiable - due to alignment with the model’s parametric knowledge.

Abstract:
Vision-language model (VLM) hallucination is commonly linked to imbalanced allocation of attention across input modalities: system, image and text. However, existing mitigation strategies tend towards an image-centric interpretation of these imbalances, often prioritising increased image attention while giving less consideration to the roles of the other modalities. In this study, we evaluate a more holistic, system-mediated account, which attributes these imbalances to functionally redundant system weights that reduce attention to image and textual inputs. We show that this framework offers a useful empirical perspective on the yes-bias, a common form of hallucination in which VLMs indiscriminately respond ‘yes’. Causally redistributing attention from the system modality to image and textual inputs substantially suppresses this bias, often outperforming existing approaches. We further present evidence suggesting that system-mediated attention imbalances contribute to the yes-bias by encouraging a default reliance on coarse input representations, which are effective for some tasks but ill-suited to others. Taken together, these findings firmly establish system attention as a key factor in VLM hallucination and highlight its potential as a lever for mitigation.

Abstract:
Temporal Entity Alignment (TEA), which aims to identify equivalent entities across Temporal Knowledge Graphs (TKGs), is crucial for integrating knowledge facts from multiple sources. However, existing TEA models often fail to capture the orthogonal yet complementary effect between structural and temporal features, and typically overlook the importance of information richness—a key factor for effective message passing in the neural feature encoders. To address these limitations, we propose a RCTEA framework that jointly models both structural and temporal aspects of the TKGs for entity alignment. Specifically, we design a richness-guided attention mechanism along with an adaptive weighting strategy to facilitate effective feature fusion. To ensure robust alignment despite noisy entity contexts, we introduce a dual-view neighborhood consensus algorithm that jointly refines the feature encoders to enforce local structural consistency of the predicted alignments. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of RCTEA, achieving state-of-the-art performance on public TEA benchmarks.

Abstract:
Multimodal aspect-based sentiment classification (MABSC) requires aspect-level sentiment inference from textual-image data that jointly convey opinions. Yet most existing approaches primarily exploit discrete polarity patterns and generic visual embeddings, making them less effective when the affect is subtle, implicit, or expressed through imagery. In this work, we propose VADE , a Valence–Arousal–Dominance ~( VAD )- E nhanced MABSC framework that brings continuous VAD signals into multimodal sentiment reasoning and learns emotion-sensitive image representations. Specifically, we design a VAD encoder to extract continuous affect cues from text for aspect-level sentiment reasoning. Furthermore, we fine-tune a CLIP-based image encoder on affect-enriched image–text pairs to obtain visual representations that are more sensitive to sentiment cues. To support the fine-tuning process, we construct an affect-enriched image–text dataset Senti-COCO by rewriting MSCOCO captions with a multimodal large language model, which yields large-scale image-text pairs with richer affective expressions. Experiments on two mainstream datasets, Twitter-15 and Twitter-17, show that VADE achieves a new state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of incorporating VAD signals for MABSC.

Abstract:
In this work, we introduce SkillWeave, a modular improvement framework that enables large language models to specialize under fixed memory budgets. SkillWeave partitions full capabilities of a general-purpose model into domain-specific skillpacks—lightweight, domain-specific delta modules—that reorganize and refine the model’s internal knowledge. To ensure deployment efficiency, SkillWeave incorporates SkillZip, a compression component that transforms specialized parameters into lightweight, inference-ready skillpacks. Together, these components allow SkillWeave to achieve strong multi-domain performance and inference-efficient execution. On multi-task and agentic benchmarks, a 9B SkillWeave model outperforms task-specific baselines and even surpasses a 32B monolithic LLM, while achieving up to 4× speedup.

Abstract:
Zeroth-Order optimization presents a promising memory-efficient paradigm for fine-tuning Large Language Models by relying solely on forward passes. However, its practical adoption is severely constrained by slow wall-clock convergence and high estimation variance. In this work, we dissect the runtime characteristics of ZO algorithms and identify a critical system bottleneck where the generation of perturbations and parameter updates accounts for over 40% of the training latency. We argue that the standard uniform exploration strategy is fundamentally flawed as it fails to account for the heterogeneous sensitivity of layers in deep networks, resulting in computationally wasteful blind searches. To address this structural mismatch, we propose AdaLeZO, an Adaptive Layer-wise ZO optimization framework. By formulating the layer selection process as a non-stationary Multi-Armed Bandit problem, AdaLeZO dynamically allocates the limited perturbation budget to the most sensitive parameters.We further introduce an Inverse Probability Weighting mechanism based on sampling with replacement, which guarantees unbiased gradient estimation while effectively acting as a temporal denoiser to reduce variance. Extensive experiments on LLaMA and OPT models ranging from 6.7B to 30B parameters demonstrate that AdaLeZO achieves 1.7× to 3.0× wall-clock acceleration compared to state-of-the-art methods. Crucially, AdaLeZO functions as a universal plug-and-play module that seamlessly enhances the efficiency of existing ZO optimizers without incurring additional memory overhead.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a standard post-training paradigm for large language models (LLMs), typically relying on group-wise reward and advantage normalization for stability. In set-valued multi-answer tasks, where multiple outputs may be simultaneously correct, this normalization can over-amplify a small number of early high-reward samples, suppressing learning signals from other valid generations and leading to overly concentrated updates. We propose Entropy-Aware Reshaping of Reinforcement Signals (EARS), a framework that reshapes how learning signals are normalized and aggregated. EARS uses token-level predictive entropy as an uncertainty cue to compute entropy-weighted reward statistics for advantage normalization, encouraging broader exploration and more balanced learning-signal allocation early in training. An adaptive decay schedule then anneals uncertainty-aware reweighting back to standard group normalization to ensure stable convergence. EARS further incorporates a correctness-gated multi-head process reward that provides auxiliary supervision on reasoning traces while remaining aligned with verifiable correctness. Experiments on MCTACO and MMLU-Multi using Qwen2.5-7B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct demonstrate consistent improvements in exact-set accuracy, training stability, and cross-dataset transfer performance on set-valued multi-answer reasoning.

Abstract:
The high cost of obtaining high-quality annotated data for in-context learning (ICL) has motivated the development of methods that use self-generated annotations in place of ground truth labels. While these approaches have shown promising results in few-shot settings, they generally do not scale to many-shot scenarios. In this work, we study ICL with self-generated examples using a framework analogous to traditional semi-supervised learning, consisting of annotation generation, demonstration selection, and in-context inference. Within this framework, we propose a simple baseline that outperforms ground truth ICL under zero-shot, few-shot, and many-shot settings. Notably, we observe consistent scaling behaviors with respect to the number of self-annotated demonstrations. To further extract performance from this many-shot capability, we introduce IterPSD, an iterative self-annotation approach that integrates iterative refinement and curriculum pseudo-labeling techniques from semi-supervised learning, yielding up to 6.8% additional gains on classification tasks. Motivated by our baseline and IterPSD results, we demonstrate that semi-supervised ICL offers a promising avenue for future ICL research.

Abstract:
Training large foundation models for agentic tasks is increasingly impractical due to the high computational costs, long iteration cycles, and rapid obsolescence as new models are continuously released. Instead of post-training massive models for every new task or domain, we propose Supplement Generation Training (SGT), a more efficient and sustainable strategy. SGT trains a smaller LLM to generate useful supplemental text that, when appended to the original input, helps the larger LLM solve the task more effectively. These lightweight models can dynamically adapt supplements to task requirements, improving performance without modifying the underlying large models. This approach decouples task-specific optimization from large foundation models and enables more flexible, cost-effective deployment of LLM-powered agents in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Steering large language model (LLM) reasoning via high-level reasoning actions offers a promising approach to improve robustness and interpretability. However, existing action-based paradigms, ranging from training-free prompting to static plan retrieval or prediction, often fail to consistently outperform standard generation because their planners tend to degenerate into repetitive loops or fixed patterns. We propose PG-HAP (Policy-Guided High-Level Action Planning), a lightweight stepwise planner–executor framework that learns to select reasoning actions dynamically while keeping the executor LLM fully frozen. The planner is trained with reinforcement learning to optimize answer correctness. To prevent degeneration, we introduce two targeted mechanisms: (i) an Action-Dependency Logit Mask that enforces valid transitions to avoid redundancy, and (ii) an Action Diversity Reward that discourages mode collapse by promoting varied action sequences. Across mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks, PG-HAP improves accuracy over strong baselines while producing less redundant, more adaptive trajectories. This demonstrates that learning high-level planning alone can substantially strengthen reasoning without expensive end-to-end model tuning.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in translation tasks. Subtitle translation presents unique challenges, such as preserving the original work’s worldview and the distinctive speaking styles of its characters. Achieving high-quality translations that reflect these stylistic nuances typically requires bilingual data for a specific movie, which is often scarce or unavailable. Thus, we propose a data augmentation method that uses LLMs to improve translation performance for specific movies, even when only a few hundred bilingual sentence pairs are available. The method expands source-side data by rewriting original subtitles using information that can be extracted from the context, such as character profiles and scene descriptions, to maintain the tone and thematic consistency of the movie. For translation, the augmented sentences are aligned with manually translated originals using structural similarity, which enables style-preserving bilingual data generation via one-shot learning. Experimental results show that data augmented using the proposed method effectively improves BLEU scores for film subtitle translation, and achieves superior stylistic quality in human evaluation.

Abstract:
Do vision-language models (VLMs) develop more human-like sensitivity to linguistic concreteness than text-only large language models (LLMs) when both are evaluated with text-only prompts? We study this question with a controlled comparison between matched Llama text backbones and their Llama Vision counterparts across multiple model scales, treating multimodal pretraining as an ablation on perceptual grounding rather than access to images at inference. We measure concreteness effects at three complementary levels: (i) output behavior, by relating question-level concreteness to QA accuracy; (ii) embedding geometry, by testing whether representations organize along a concreteness axis; and (iii) attention dynamics, by quantifying context reliance via attention-entropy measures. In addition, we elicit token-level concreteness ratings from models and evaluate alignment to human norm distributions, testing whether multimodal training yields more human-consistent judgments. Across benchmarks and scales, VLMs show larger gains on more concrete inputs, exhibit clearer concreteness-structured representations, produce ratings that better match human norms, and display systematically different attention patterns consistent with increased grounding.

Abstract:
LLM agents operating over massive, dynamic tool libraries rely on effective retrieval, yet standard single-shot dense retrievers struggle with complex requests. These failures primarily stem from the disconnect between abstract user goals and technical documentation, and the limited capacity of fixed-size embeddings to model combinatorial tool compositions. To address these challenges, we propose ToolQP, a lightweight framework that models retrieval as iterative query planning. Instead of single-shot matching, ToolQP decomposes instructions into sub-tasks and dynamically generates queries to interact with the retriever, effectively bridging the semantic gap by targeting the specific sub-tasks required for composition. We train ToolQP using synthetic query trajectories followed by optimization with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). Experiments demonstrate that ToolQP achieves state-of-the-art performance, exhibiting superior zero-shot generalization, robustness across diverse retrievers, and significant improvements in downstream agentic execution.

Abstract:
Relation extraction is a fundamental task in information extraction. Still, existing supervised approaches rely heavily on large-scale annotated data, limiting their applicability in domain-specific and low-resource scenarios. Prompt-based methods with large language models provide a parameter-efficient alternative; however, their performance is susceptible to prompt design, which often requires extensive domain expertise and heuristic trial-and-error. We propose REPO, a reinforcement learning-based automated prompt optimization framework for domain relation extraction. REPO formulates prompt construction as a structured, sequential decision-making problem, optimizing prompt quality through interaction with a black-box LLM. To enable efficient and stable optimization, we introduce a two-stage framework comprising an initial prompt-construction stage that generates semantically grounded candidates and a DRL-based refinement stage that iteratively improves prompts within a constrained, domain-aware action space. We further design a composite evaluation metric that integrates extraction accuracy and semantic consistency to serve as a dense reward signal. Extensive experiments on multiple relation extraction datasets across medical, financial, legal, and news domains demonstrate that REPO consistently outperforms existing prompt-based methods and supervised baselines. Ablation studies further confirm the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed DRL-based prompt optimization strategy. Our code is available at https://github.com/dddong2-star/REPO .

Abstract:
Language model (LM) evaluators that generate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning are widely used for the assessment of LM responses. Simultaneously, increasing LMs’ "thinking" time through scaling test-time compute has proven to be an effective technique for solving challenging problems in domains such as math and code. This raises a natural question: can an LM’s evaluation capability also be improved by scaling test-time compute? To answer this, we investigate employing reasoning models - LMs that natively generate long CoT reasoning - as evaluators. We explore scaling evaluation-time compute by using reasoning models to evaluate both the overall candidate response (i.e., outcome evaluation) and the individual reasoning steps within it (i.e., process evaluation). We observe that evaluator performance improves monotonically with the number of reasoning tokens generated, mirroring trends seen in LM reasoning. Furthermore, we use these more accurate evaluators to rerank multiple generations, and demonstrate that spending more compute at evaluation time can be as effective as increasing compute during generation for improving an LM’s problem-solving performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with complex reasoning tasks due to their limitations in addressing the vast reasoning space and inherent ambiguities of natural language. We propose the Mixture-of-Search-Agents (MOSA) paradigm, a novel approach leveraging the collective expertise of multiple LLMs to enhance search-based reasoning. MOSA integrates diverse reasoning pathways by combining independent exploration with iterative refinement among LLMs, mitigating the limitations of single-model approaches. Using Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) as a backbone, MOSA enables multiple agents to propose and aggregate reasoning steps, resulting in improved accuracy. Our comprehensive evaluation across four reasoning benchmarks demonstrates MOSA’s consistent performance improvements over single-agent and other multi-agent baselines, particularly in complex mathematical and commonsense reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often produce content that contradicts or overlooks information provided in the input context, a phenomenon known as faithfulness hallucination. In this paper, we propose Context-Fidelity Boosting (CFB), a lightweight and general decoding-time framework that effectively reduces such hallucinations by boosting the generation probability of context-relevant tokens. Motivated by logit-shaping principles in watermarking techniques, CFB leverages token-level logit adjustments based on their presence or salience in the input context. Specifically, we develop three boosting strategies, static, context-aware, and token-aware that progressively incorporate distributional divergence, attention scores, and semantic similarity. Notably, CFB requires no retraining or architectural changes, making it compatible with a wide range of LLMs. Experiments on summarization and question answering tasks across multiple open-source LLMs show that CFB consistently improves faithfulness metrics, with minimal generation overhead. Our implementation is fully open-sourced.

Abstract:
Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) for Urdu remains an under-researched area due to the lack of annotated datasets. This paper addresses the challenge of generating a robust corpus for fine-tuning deep learning models aimed at Urdu GEC. We propose a method for synthesizing a large dataset by collecting errors from the Urdu WikiEdits history, learning from them, and inserting similar errors in grammatically correct sentences to generate incorrect sentences with grammatical errors, hence creating a pair of grammatically correct and incorrect sentences. We introduce UrduGEC-Synthetic, a synthetically generated dataset produced through this pipeline. Furthermore, we introduce UrduGEC-Gold, a Gold Dataset by extracting errors from exam copies of students. Finally, we also fine-tuned various models on UrduGEC-Synthetic and evaluated them against UrduGEC-Gold to show the quality of synthetic data generation.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has demonstrated strong effectiveness in knowledge-intensive tasks by grounding language generation in external evidence. Despite its success, many existing RAG systems are built based on a ranking-centric, asymmetric dependency paradigm, where the generation quality of the generator is highly dependent on reranking results of the reranker.To overcome this limitation, we propose Cooperative Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CoRAG), a framework that treats the reranker and the generator as peer decision-makers rather than being connected through an asymmetric dependency pipeline. By jointly optimizing their behaviors toward a shared task objective, the reranker and generator are encouraged to cooperate, ensuring that document reranking and generation work in concert to improve the final response.Experimental results demonstrate good generalization and improved generation stability of CoRAG, even when the model is trained on only around 10K PopQA samples. Our model released in https://github.com/CoderrrSong/CoRAG

Abstract:
We study how large language models recall relational knowledge during text generation, with a focus on identifying latent representations suitable for relation classification via linear probes.Prior work shows how attention heads and MLPs interact to resolve subject, predicate, and object, but it remains unclear which representations support faithful linear relation classification and why some relation types are easier to capture linearly than others.We systematically evaluate different latent representations derived from attention head and MLP contributions, showing that per-head attention contributions to the residual stream are comparatively strong features for linear relation classification.Feature attribution analyses of the trained probes, as well as characteristics of the different relation types, reveal clear correlations between probe accuracy and relation specificity, entity connectedness, and how distributed the signal on which the probe relies is across attention heads.Finally, we show how token-level feature attribution of probe predictions can be used to reveal probe behavior in further detail.

Abstract:
Understanding the emotions that individuals in crisis express is a clinically relevant goal. Here, we introduce an automated method for extracting present and past personal emotion expressions from text-based crisis conversations, enabling nuanced analyses of how these emotional profiles vary by age. We develop a three-tier emotion taxonomy and leverage both real conversation data and synthetic sentences to train a transformer-based model that captures contextual distinctions between true personal emotion expressions and other mentions. Our RoBERTa-based classifier outperforms both a regex baseline and a model trained only on real conversation data, achieving an F1 score of 0.856. Subsequent analysis of 338,924 crisis conversations shows that age is correlated with distinct patterns in emotional expressions. These findings underscore the clinical value of age-sensitive emotion analysis and constitute an initial step toward characterizing lexical variations across demographic groups.

Abstract:
We introduce the task of grounded article generation with the goal of creating a Wikipedia-style article from multiple diverse videos about real-world events—from natural disasters to political elections—where all the information in the article is supported by video evidence. Videos are intuitive sources for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), but most contemporary RAG workflows focus heavily on text while existing methods for video-based summarization focus on low-level scene understanding rather than high-level event semantics. To close this gap, we introduce , a benchmark consisting of expert-written articles and densely annotated videos that provide evidence for articles’ claims, facilitating the integration of video into RAG pipelines and enabling the creation of in-depth content that is grounded in multimodal sources. We further propose Collaborative Article Generation (CAG), a novel interactive method for article creation from multiple videos. CAG leverages an iterative interaction between an r1-style reasoning model and a VideoLLM to draw higher-level inferences about the target event than is possible with VideoLLMs alone, which fixate on low-level visual features. We benchmark state-of-the-art VideoLLMs and CAG in both oracle retrieval and RAG settings and find that CAG consistently outperforms alternative methods, while suggesting intriguing avenues for future work.

Abstract:
Video-LLMs face a fundamental tension in long-video reasoning: static, sparse frame sampling either dilutes evidence across task-irrelevant segments at significant cost or misses fine-grained temporal semantics altogether. We propose a novel, cognitively-inspired task — Endomorphic Multimodal Compression (EMC) — as a structurally-constrained sufficient-statistic problem for VideoQA, and formulate it as an endomorphic transformation F_EMC : (V, Q) → (v, q) that compresses the multimodal input while preserving answer invariance across reasonable downstream models. The endomorphic form keeps the compressed output in the downstream pipeline’s native task space — a structural mirror of the filter-then-reason mechanism in the cognitive literature motivating EMC — distinguishing it from latent-code compression (IB / VIB) and making the formulation extensible to other multimodal settings. Under the Markov chain A → (V, Q) → (v, q), EMC realizes the classical sufficiency condition I((v, q); A) = I((V, Q); A) in its VideoQA-natural form. As a modular front-end, EMC plugs into both Video Instruction Tuning and Video Question Answering pipelines. We release the first dedicated benchmark and propose ReSimplifyIt, an EMC baseline surpassing prior methods by 0.40 F-1 with competitive query rewriting. Integrating EMC yields relative gains of 7.33% in training and 33.7% in inference for video-language understanding.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, significant effort is spent on manually crafting prompts to unlock their full potential. While existing prompt optimization methods automate this process, they often underperform due to their reliance on learning exclusively from incorrect samples. We propose the Learning from Contrastive Prompts (LCP) framework, which leverages contrastive prompts to distinguish between high- and low-performing cases. By identifying and amplifying the differences that make prompts effective, LCP systematically extracts principles underlying successful prompt design. On the Big-Bench Hard benchmark, LCP achieves an 87.5% win rate on Claude-3-Sonnet and 75.7% on Claude-4-Sonnet. Experiments on DeepSeek-R1 (88.2% win rate) and SuperGLUE further confirm that LCP generalizes across both proprietary and open-source models and diverse NLU benchmarks.The framework offers a principled and scalable foundation for automated prompt engineering, reducing manual intervention in adapting LLMs to diverse applications.

Abstract:
Text-to-image (T2I) models have achieved remarkable progress in high-quality image synthesis, yet most benchmarks rely on simple, self-contained prompts, failing to capture the complexity of real-world captions. Human-written captions often involve multiple interacting subjects, rich contextual references, and abstractive phrasing, conditions under which current image-text encoders like CLIP struggle. To systematically study these deficiencies, we introduce ANCHOR, a large-scale dataset of 70K+ abstractive captions sourced from five major news media organizations. Analysis with ANCHOR reveals persistent failures in multi-subject understanding, context reasoning, and nuanced grounding. Motivated by these challenges, we propose Subject-Aware Fine-tuning (SAFE), which uses Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract key subjects and enhance their representation at the embedding-level. Experiments with contemporary models show that SAFE significantly improves image-caption consistency and human preference alignment, serving as a practical and scalable solution. The dataset and code will be released upon publication.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but typically require expensive post-training to reach high performance. Recent test-time alignment methods offer a lightweight alternative, but have been explored mainly for preference alignment rather than reasoning. To bridge this gap, we propose Token-level Adaptive Routing (TARo), which steers frozen LLMs toward structured reasoning entirely at inference time. Specifically, we first train reward models on step-wise mathematical traces to capture fine-grained logical consistency signals, then introduce a learnable token-level router that automatically controls the guidance of the reward model to the base model. Extensive experiments show that TARo significantly improves reasoning performance by up to +22.4% over base model and +8.4% over existing token-level test-time alignment methods, while also boosting out-of-distribution clinical reasoning (MedXpertQA) and instruction following (AlpacaEval). Furthermore, TARo also generalizes from small to large backbones without retraining, extending test-time alignment from preference optimization to robust, cross-domain reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face a fundamental challenge with delayed disambiguation: How is the meaning of an ambiguous word updated when clarifying context arrives only after it has been processed? While LLMs possess the latent capacity to resolve such ambiguities—as revealed when a full, non-causal context is provided—their unidirectional architecture prevents immediate updates. We investigate the underlying computational mechanism and show this semantic re-evaluation is deferred to subsequent tokens in a process we term "Deferred Semantic Drift (DSD)". Through targeted analysis of attentional pathways, we find that later tokens actively retrieve context-dependent "informational packets" from the ambiguous word’s value vector to steer the final interpretation. We demonstrate this mechanism in metaphor comprehension and provide causal validation by steering model outputs towards literal or metaphorical meanings via targeted activation interventions. This research uncovers a key computational strategy for meaning construction, offering crucial insights for understanding and guiding the behavior of LLMs.

Abstract:
Code-mixing involves the seamless integration of linguistic elements from multiple languages within a single discourse, reflecting natural multilingual communication patterns. Despite its prominence in informal interactions such as social media, chat messages and instant-messaging exchanges, there has been a lack of publicly available corpora that are author-labeled and suitable for modeling human conversations and relationships. This study introduces the first labeled and general-purpose corpus for understanding code-mixing in context while maintaining rigorous privacy and ethical standards. It includes over 355,641 messages spanning various code-mixing patterns, with a primary focus on English, Mandarin, and other languages. We expect the Codemix Corpus to serve as a foundational dataset for research in computational linguistics, sociolinguistics, and NLP applications.

Abstract:
Document parsing from scanned images into structured formats remains a significant challenge due to its complexly intertwined elements such as text paragraphs, figures, formulas, and tables. Existing supervised fine-tuning methods often struggle to generalize across diverse document types, leading to poor performance, particularly on out-of-distribution data. This issue is further exacerbated by the limited availability of high-quality training data for layout-aware parsing tasks. To address these challenges, we introduce layoutRL, a reinforcement learning framework that optimizes layout understanding through composite rewards integrating normalized edit distance, paragraph count accuracy, and reading order preservation. To support this training, we construct the Infinity-Doc-400K dataset, which we use to train Infinity-Parser, a vision-language model demonstrating robust generalization across various domains. Extensive evaluations on benchmarks including OmniDocBench, olmOCR-Bench, PubTabNet, and FinTabNet show that Infinity-Parser consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance across a broad range of document types, languages, and structural complexities, substantially outperforming both specialized document parsing systems and general-purpose vision-language models. We will release our code, dataset, and model to facilitate reproducible research in document parsing.

Abstract:
Recent advances in speech generation have enabled high-fidelity synthesis, yet systematic evaluation of models under long-context conditions remains largely underexplored. A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for long-form speech is indispensable for two reasons: 1) existing test scenarios are often confined to limited domains, creating a significant gap with the diverse downstream applications; 2) existing metrics overlook critical long-text factors such as consistency and coherence, failing to generalize reliably. To this end, we propose LFSBench, a comprehensive benchmark that decomposes “long-form speech quality” into specific, disentangled dimensions. LFSBench has three key properties. 1) Rich speech scenarios: Focusing on long-form speech generation and multi-speaker dialog generation, LFSBench covers acoustics, semantics, and expressiveness challenges, and consists of 1,101 samples spanning 17 common speech scenarios; 2) Comprehensive evaluation dimensions: Along the acoustics, semantics, and expressiveness axes, LFSBench defines an automated evaluation protocol with seven metrics to provide a comprehensive, accurate, and standardized assessment; 3) Valuable Insights: Through extensive experiments, we reveal that current models still struggle in highly expressive scenarios and exhibit a notable gap in consistency and hierarchy compared to real recordings.

Abstract:
Reliable interpretation of multimodal dental data is essential for automated oral healthcare, yet current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show limited understanding of dental images. Although complex reasoning improves performance, its gains in dentistry are substantially smaller than in other medical domains, suggesting that complex reasoning is not yet sufficiently incentivized for dental diagnosis, likely due to insufficient domain knowledge and limited reinforcement learning on dental questions. We present DentalGPT, a dentistry-specialized MLLM trained via staged multimodal alignment and reinforcement learning. By constructing the largest annotated multimodal dental dataset to date with over 120k images, multimodal alignment provides the necessary domain knowledge foundation to support and incentivize complex reasoning, which is further strengthened through reinforcement learning. Experiments on expert-annotated benchmarks and dental subsets of medical VQA benchmarks show that DentalGPT achieves superior performance on disease classification and dental VQA tasks, outperforming many state-of-the-art MLLMs despite its compact 7B parameter scale.

Abstract:
Algorithm Visualization (AV) helps students build mental models by animating algorithm execution states. Recent LLM-based systems such as CODE2VIDEO generate AV videos in an end-to-end manner. However, this paradigm requires the system to simultaneously simulate algorithm flow and satisfy video rendering constraints (element layout, color schemes, etc.), a complex task that induces LLM hallucinations. This results in reduced execution success rates, element overlap, and inter-frame inconsistencies.To address these challenges, we propose ALGOGEN, a novel paradigm that decouples algorithm execution from rendering. We first introduce Visualization Trace Algebra (VTA), a monoid over algorithm visual states and operations. The LLM then generates a Python tracker that simulates algorithm flow and outputs VTA-JSON traces, a JSON encoding of VTA. For rendering, we define a Rendering Style Language (RSL) to templatize algorithm layouts. A deterministic renderer then compiles algorithm traces with RSL into Manim, LaTeX/TikZ, or Three.js outputs[Manim, TikZ, and Three.js are respectively a Python animation engine, a LaTeX vector graphics package, and a JavaScript 3D rendering library.].Evaluated on a LeetCode AV benchmark of 200 tasks, ALGOGEN achieves an average success rate improvement of 17.3% compared to end-to-end methods (99.8% vs. 82.5%). These results demonstrate that our decoupling paradigm effectively mitigates LLM hallucinations in complex AV tasks, providing a more reliable solution for automated generation of high-quality algorithm visualizations. Demo videos and code are available at: .

Abstract:
Grouping-based methods have emerged as a significant frontier in Reinforcement Learning (RL), yet agentic reasoning poses a fundamental challenge for grouping-based methods: frequent environmental interactions and multi-step tool invocation generate highly variable trajectories, rendering intra-group advantage estimation unstable. In response, practitioners resort to excessive rollouts to stabilize training, which in turn incurs prohibitive computational costs. This negative feedback loop between advantage estimation instability and sampling inefficiency severely limits learning performance. We present PVPO, a stable and efficient critic-free RL framework that breaks this cycle through a pre-estimated value baseline and pre-sampled data filtering. Specifically, before training begins, PVPO performs a single round of rollouts to compute two signals: (1) Static V, a Monte Carlo estimate of the expected return that serves as a fixed baseline to stabilize advantage estimation; and (2) sample-level accuracy, as a difficulty metric to filter out trivial samples and inject ground-truth trajectories into hard ones, thereby enhancing training efficiency. As shown in Figure 1, experiments demonstrate that PVPO outperforms other grouping-based methods in both multi-step retrieval tasks and advanced mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Notably, our 7B model trained with PVPO matches or exceeds the performance of large language models (LLMs). Moreover, PVPO achieves a 2.5x speedup in training time compared to prior methods while maintaining comparable final performance.

Abstract:
Offline preference optimization methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), offer significant advantages in aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human values. However, achieving optimal performance with these methods typically involves additional hyperparameter tuning, resulting in substantial time overhead. Although prior work has proposed a range of improvements, these methods remain limited in effectiveness and have not fully eliminated reliance on hyperparameter tuning. In this work, we introduce RMiPO, a lightweight and efficient framework for offline preference optimization. RMiPO leverages intrinsic Response-level Mutual information for Preference Optimization with hyperparameter modulation, dynamically decoupling preference contributions at negligible additional computational cost. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that RMiPO achieves consistently superior performance over existing methods while reducing training overhead by more than 15%. Our code is available at https://github.com/liavonpenn/rmipo.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) effectively extends the knowledge boundaries of large language models (LLMs) for complex tasks, yet current paradigms typically optimize for an interleaving of reasoning and retrieval, where models fail to critically evaluate retrieved information against the target question. Most existing methods rely on sparse outcome-based rewards, failing to provide explicit supervision for the internal reasoning process or to diagnose information inadequacy. To address this, we propose Eval-RAR, an Evaluation-driven Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning framework. Eval-RAR introduces a "Search-then-Evaluate" paradigm where the model performs explicit self-evaluation after each search step, generating a rationale to either identify sufficient evidence or specify missing information to guide subsequent queries. To optimize this process, we employ reinforcement learning with a fine-grained evaluation reward, providing intermediate feedback that encourages the model to track core entities and maintain logical consistency. Experiments on seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that Eval-RAR outperforms existing methods.

Abstract:
Prior work evaluates code generation bias primarily through simple conditional statements, which represent only a narrow slice of real-world programming and reveal solely overt, explicitly encoded bias. We demonstrate that this approach dramatically underestimates real-world bias by examining a more realistic task: generating machine learning (ML) pipelines. Testing both code-specialized and general-instruction large language models, we find that ML pipelines exhibit substantially greater bias than simple conditionals across all conditions: standard generation, with varying prompt-based mitigation strategies, varying numbers of attributes, and different ML pipeline difficulty levels. Even attribute selection alone, the simplest pipeline difficulty, shows higher bias compared to conditionals, demonstrating that ML pipelines inherently amplify bias beyond what isolated conditionals reveal. Critically, we uncover a stark asymmetry: models maintain equivalent bias detection performance on both simple conditionals and ML pipelines, revealing that models recognize bias equally well in both contexts yet generate significantly more biased code in ML pipelines. These findings challenge simple conditionals as valid proxies for bias evaluation and suggest current benchmarks mischaracterize model safety in practical deployment contexts.

Abstract:
Grammatical error correction (GEC) systems are usually trained and evaluated on GEC benchmarks, but their performance often drops sharply once the surrounding context is slightly perturbed or extended. This indicates that the existing GEC models usually fail to understand the error patterns in the varying contexts. In this paper, we thoroughly investigate the counterfactuals for GEC tasks, where the subtle changes to the contexts could lead to the label flipping issue. We address this robustness gap by viewing contextual variation through the lens of counterfactual data. We propose CoCoGEC, a counterfactual generation framework that creates copies of training instances with error-irrelevant contexts altered. Our framework systematically generates counterfactuals by (1) generating intra- and inter-sentence counterfactuals that maintain the error patterns as well as syntax of the original instances by altering the word-level and sentence-level contexts; (2) revising the generated counterfactuals by selecting the instances with flipped labels and high GEC Mutual Information (MI) coefficient. Extensive experiments show that our method substantially improves the stability of GEC models, outperforming a set of data augmentation baselines. Particularly, it could achieve absolute F 0.5 gains of +9.9 , +11.3 , and +20.8 points on the perturbed BEA-19,CoNLL-14, and TEM-8 data set.Our code is released at https://github.com/Quinnok/CoCoGEC.

Abstract:
Integrating explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) into end-to-end spoken dialogue models enhances intelligence but incurs prohibitive latency. While the "Thinking-while-Talking" paradigm alleviates this delay, it fundamentally compromises block atomicity, severing the logical connection between interleaved thought and speech. To address this, we present Dual-Reasoner, employing a Streaming Masking Mechanism underpinned by our Dual-Think-30k dataset to guarantee uninterrupted audio streaming. Crucially, to strictly align the fragmented thinking blocks to service speech generation, we introduce the Atomic-Consistency Restoration framework. To secure comprehensive capabilities in high-difficulty reasoning, this mechanism utilizes a quadruple-constraint system to reconstruct logical atomicity, ensuring that "think" chunks act as a rigorous anchor for "talk" outputs. Experimental results demonstrate that Dual-Reasoner achieves comprehensive reasoning enhancements within ultra-low latency constraints: it elevates the VoiceBench score from 67.24 to 73.41 over the baseline, while significantly reducing the Time-to-First-Audio (TTFA) from 20.35s to 3.65s and the Real-Time Factor (RTF) from 7.04 to 1.05.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) excel across many tasks, yet inference is still dominated by strictly token-by-token autoregression. Existing acceleration methods largely patch this pipeline and miss core human-reading ingredients: content-adaptive foresight, chunk-structure-aware compute allocation, and train–test consistency for preview/skimming. We propose the Fovea–Block–Skip Transformer (FBS), which injects a causal, trainable loop into Transformers via Parafovea-Attention Window (PAW), Chunk-Head (CH), and Skip-Gate (SG). Across diverse benchmarks, FBS improves the quality-efficiency trade-off without increasing parameters, and ablations show the three modules are complementary.

Abstract:
We observe that entropy in reinforcement learning functions analogously to the learning rate in LLMs. Maintaining stable entropy, as demonstrated in DAPO, helps stabilize RL training, while rapid entropy annealing (i.e., so-called entropy collapse) accelerates local performance improvement and enables faster convergence. We argue that these two processes are not antithetical, but can be effectively controlled and scheduled within a single training run, similar to learning rate scheduling. We propose Entropy Schduling (ES), which optimizes different pre-set goals (e.g. k in optimizing Pass@k) by controlling and scheduling entropy at each step of the RL process. We find that maintaining stable entropy early in training followed by entropy annealing achieves superior performance. Moreover, since stable-state entropy and annealed entropy exhibit distinctly different learning dynamics, curriculum learning can be seamlessly integrated to maximize model performance based on different entropy phases. We show that entropy scheduling is straightforward to implement and intuitive in design. Extensive experiments suggest that it delivers consistent and stable performance improvements across diverse models and algorithms.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling improves large language models (LLMs) on long-horizon reasoning tasks by allocating more compute at inference. LLM inference via tree search (LITS) achieves strong performance but is highly inefficient. We propose Chain-in-Tree (CiT), a plug-in framework that decides when to branch during search instead of expanding at every step. CiT introduces lightweight Branching Necessity (BN) evaluations, including BN-DP (direct prompting) and BN-SC (self-consistency). Integrated into Tree of Thoughts, ReST-MCTS, and RAP, BN-DP reduces token generation, model calls, and runtime by 75-85% on GSM8K and Math500, with often negligible or no accuracy loss. BN-SC typically yields substantial savings (up to 80%) generally but shows instability in 1-4 out of 14 settings, caused by a small subset of examples that produce extremely long reasoning steps. We theoretically prove that BN-DP never increases policy invocations and release unified implementations applicable across LITS frameworks. The full codebase is publicly available at https://github.com/xinzhel/chain_in_tree.

Abstract:
Next location prediction aims to infer the next location users are likely to visit based on their historical check-in data. However, existing methods assume that check-in data is complete, overlooking the subjective nature of users’ check-in behavior, leading to inaccurate capture of user preferences. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have offered a promising approach to location completion due to their extensive world knowledge. Nevertheless, our experiments reveal that LLMs struggle to interpret raw geographic coordinate information. To address these challenges, we propose LaMDA, an LLM-driven Multi-perspective Data Augmentation framework that employs dual completion agents to complement user mobility behaviors. Driven by our empirical findings that natural language descriptions align more closely with real-world geographic logic, LaMDA translates geographic coordinates into text to enhance spatial reasoning. Leveraging these semantic descriptions, LaMDA constructs dual agents to complement user mobility: "Micro-Level Completion" fills short-term omissions, while "Macro-Level Completion" infers unrecorded locations based on periodic preferences. Reliability is ensured through tailored real-world point-of-interest (POI) pools and a self-verification mechanism. Finally, a collaborative dual-graph module leverages this augmented data for fine-grained preference modeling. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that LaMDA significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) have shifted from simple vector similarity to structure-aware approaches like HippoRAG, which leverage Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Personalized PageRank (PPR) to capture multi-hop dependencies. However, these methods suffer from a "Static Graph Fallacy": fixed transition probabilities set during indexing ignore query-dependent edgerelevance, causing semantic drift where random walks are diverted into high-degree "hub" nodes before reaching critical evidence. Models often achieve high partial recall but fail to retrieve the complete evidence chain for multi-hop queries. To address this, we propose CatRAG, Context-Aware Traversal for robust RAG, which builds on the HippoRAG 2 and transforms the static KG into a query-adaptive navigation structure. CatRAG steers the random walk via three mechanisms: (1) Symbolic Anchoring, injecting weak entity constraints to regularize the random walk; (2) QueryAware Dynamic Edge Weighting, dynamically modulating graph structure to prune irrelevant paths and amplify query-aligned ones; and (3) Key-Fact Passage Weight Enhancement, a cost-efficient bias anchoring the walk to key evidence. Experiments across multi-hop benchmarks show that CatRAG outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. While standard Recall gains are modest, CatRAG achieves substantial improvements in reasoning completeness—the capacity to recover entire evidence chains without gaps. These results reveal that CatRAG effectively bridges the gap between retrieving partial context and enabling fully grounded reasoning. Resources are available at https://github.com/kwunhang/CatRAG.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities.However, their deployment is hindered by significant computational costs. Existing structured pruning methods, while hardware-efficient, often suffer from significant accuracy degradation. In this paper, we argue that this failure stems from a stage-agnostic pruning approach that overlooks the asymmetric roles between the prefill and decode stages. By introducing a virtual gate mechanism, our importance analysis reveals that deep layers are critical for next-token prediction (decode) but largely redundant for context encoding (prefill). Leveraging this insight, we propose Prefill-Only Pruning (POP), a stage-aware inference strategy that safely omits deep layers during the computationally intensive prefill stage while retaining the full model for the sensitive decode stage. To enable the transition between stages, we introduce independent Key-Value (KV) projections to maintain cache integrity, and a boundary handling strategy to ensure the accuracy of the first generated token. Extensive experiments on Llama-3.1, Qwen3-VL, and Gemma-3 across diverse modalities demonstrate that POP achieves up to 1.37 × speedup in prefill latency with minimal performance loss, effectively overcoming the accuracy-efficiency trade-off limitations of existing structured pruning methods.

Abstract:
Hard-gated safety checkers often over-refuse and misalign with a vendor’s model spec; prevailing taxonomies also neglect robustness and honesty, yielding safer-on-paper yet less useful systems. This work introduces Guardian-as-an-Advisor (GaaA), a soft-gating pipeline where a guardian predicts a binary risk label plus a concise explanation and prepends this advice to the original query for re-inference, keeping the base model operating under its original spec. To support training and evaluation, GuardSet is constructed—a 208k+ multi-domain dataset unifying harmful and harmless cases with targeted robustness and honesty slices. GuardAdvisor is trained via SFT followed by RL to enforce label–explanation consistency. GuardAdvisor attains competitive detection accuracy while enabling the advisory workflow; when used to augment inputs, responses improve over unaugmented prompts. A latency study shows advisor inference uses below 5% of base-model compute and adds only 2–10% end-to-end overhead under realistic harmful-input rates. Overall, GaaA steers models to comply with the model spec, maintaining safety while reducing over-refusal.

Abstract:
Aspect-based sentiment analysis has garnered increasing attention in the research community; however, most studies have predominantly focused on English datasets, with other languages such as Chinese, Japanese, and German being neglected due to the limited availability of adequately labeled data. Even within English, labeled data is scarce. To address these challenges, this study investigates the utilization of a multilingual pre-trained setting to leverage resources from diverse languages for aspect-based sentiment analysis. Specifically, we propose a Cross-lingual Knowledge Fusion framework that explores various single-round and two-round bilingual pre-training configurations. This framework utilizes both the original and translated texts, along with their corresponding labels, to pre-train the multilingual model. Evaluation results reveal that our model significantly outperforms state-of-the-art performance across multiple languages, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed multilingual pre-trained language model for aspect-based sentiment analysis.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable capabilities in machine translation (MT). However, most advanced MT-specific LLMs rely heavily on external supervision during training, such as human-annotated reference data or trained reward models (RMs), which are expensive to obtain and difficult to scale. To address this limitation, we propose Simple Self-Rewarding (SSR), a reinforcement learning (RL) framework for MT that is reference-free and relies solely on self-judging rewards. Using only 13K monolingual examples and Qwen-2.5-7B as the backbone, SSR-Zero-7B outperforms existing MT-specific LLMs as well as larger general LLMs such as Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct on English ↔ Chinese translation benchmarks including WMT23, WMT24, and FLORES200. It further demonstrates strong generalization to low-resource language pairs. In addition, when augmented with external supervision from COMET, our strongest model, SSR-X-Zero-7B, surpasses all existing open-source models under 72B parameters and performs competitively with leading closed-source systems in English ↔ Chinese translation. Our analysis highlights the effectiveness and generalizability of the self-rewarding mechanism relative to external LLM-as-a-judge approaches and demonstrates its complementary benefits when combined with trained RMs. We will publicly release our code, data, and models.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable abilities, one of the most important being in-context learning (ICL). With ICL, LLMs can derive the underlying rule from a few demonstrations and provide answers that comply with the rule. Previous work hypothesized that the network creates a task vector in specific positions during ICL. The task vector can be computed by averaging across the dataset. It conveys the overall task information and can thus be considered global. Patching the global task vector allows LLMs to achieve zero-shot performance with dummy inputs comparable to few-shot learning. However, we find that such a global task vector does not exist in all tasks, especially in tasks that rely on rules that can only be inferred from multiple demonstrations, such as categorization tasks. Instead, the information provided by each demonstration is first transmitted to its answer position and forms a local task vector associated with the demonstration. In some tasks but not in categorization tasks, all demonstrations’ local task vectors converge in later layers, forming the global task vector. We further show that local task vectors encode a high-level abstraction of rules extracted from the demonstrations. Our study provides novel insights into the mechanism underlying ICL in LLMs, demonstrating how ICL may be achieved through an information aggregation mechanism.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently suffer from unfaithfulness, generating reasoning chains that drift from visual evidence or contradict final predictions. We propose Faithful-First Reasoning, Planning, and Acting (RPA) framework in which FaithEvi provides step-wise and chain-level supervision by evaluating the faithfulness of intermediate reasoning, and FaithAct uses these signals to plan and execute faithfulness-aware actions during inference. Experiments across multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that faithful-first RPA improves perceptual faithfulness by up to 24% over prompt-based and tool-augmented reasoning frameworks, without degrading task accuracy. Our analysis shows that treating faithfulness as a guiding principle perceptually faithful reasoning trajectories and mitigates hallucination behavior. This work thereby establishes a unified framework for both evaluating and enforcing faithfulness in multimodal reasoning. Code is at https://github.com/lijunxian111/Faithful-First-RPA.

Abstract:
With the prevalence of Large Language Models (LLMs), Text-to-SQL has made significant progress, yet applying it to massive, real-world databases remains a challenge. While previous works adopt a retrieve-then-generate framework, they struggle with the profound semantic gap between user queries and vague schema definitions. Existing methods relying on unidirectional query expansion often fail to bridge lexical mismatches, while graph-based approaches struggle to navigate schemas when explicit structural links (e.g., foreign keys) are missing. To address this, we propose Bi-SR, a retrieval framework that bridges this gap through a bidirectional semantic enhancement strategy. We simultaneously enrich vague table schemas offline and perform online generative query expansion—specifically predicting potential schema structures—to align user intent. Crucially, we introduce a dual-augmented contrastive training objective for the dense retriever, which trains the dense retriever to recognize the semantic correspondence between the LLM-expanded query intent and the detailed schema descriptions. Experiments on massive schema routing benchmarks constructed from BIRD and Spider demonstrate that Bi-SR achieves state-of-the-art performance and significantly empowers smaller models for cost-effective deployment.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are strong reasoners but still hallucinate and make unreliable decisions on knowledge-intensive questions. Knowledge graphs (KGs) provide explicit, auditable facts, motivating KGQA agents that interact with KGs via tool calls to reduce hallucinations. However, LLM agents often struggle to reliably manipulate KG-specific symbols (entity IDs and relation names), leading to invalid or hallucinated tool-call arguments, and high-quality step-by-step supervision for such tool use is scarce. Meanwhile, large datasets of expert SPARQL programs exist for Freebase KGQA, but naively converting them into action supervision is brittle: SPARQL assumes a global view of the KG, while an agent acts from a truncated, local prompt, so expert steps can reference KG IDs (entity/relation/attribute symbols) that are not visible at decision time. We present Graph Explorer, a fully automatic data synthesis pipeline that turns expert SPARQL into executable, visibility-grounded (actions may use only IDs shown in the prompt) tool supervision without manual trace labeling. Graph Explorer compiles SPARQL into tool-call plans, executes them under the same context-control policy used at inference, and retains only tool-interaction traces whose tool-call arguments are visible at decision time, yielding clean (context, next-action) pairs for action-centric fine-tuning. We evaluate with a strict finish-or-fail protocol (success only if the agent issues a valid Finish within budget). Under this protocol, our fine-tuned Qwen3-8B reaches 74.0/80.2 Hit@1 on CWQ/WebQSP, improving over a reproduced prompting baseline by +22.5/+16.2 points, indicating more faithful multi-step graph exploration from visible evidence.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have made impressive strides in mathematical reasoning, often fine-tuned using rejection sampling, which retains only correct reasoning trajectories. While effective, this paradigm treats supervision as a binary filter that systematically excludes teacher-generated errors, leaving a gap in how reasoning failures are modeled during training. In this paper, we propose TrajFusion, a fine-tuning strategy that reframes rejection sampling as a structured supervision construction process. Specifically, TrajFusion forms fused trajectories that explicitly model trial-and-error reasoning by interleaving selected incorrect trajectories with reflection prompts and correct trajectories. The length of the fused sample is adaptively controlled based on the frequency and diversity of teacher errors, providing richer supervision for challenging problems while safely reducing to vanilla rejection sampling fine-tuning (RFT) when error signals are uninformative. TrajFusion requires no changes to the architecture or training objective. Extensive experiments across multiple math benchmarks demonstrate that TrajFusion consistently outperforms RFT, particularly on challenging and long-form reasoning problems.

Abstract:
Although vision-language pre-trained (VLP) models have achieved remarkable success across multimodal tasks, they remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations.Existing universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) methods in multimodal settings—whether generator-based or optimization-based—often suffer from limited cross-model transferability, especially in black-box scenarios.We attribute this limitation to the prevalent use of symmetric or distribution-level objectives that overlook the asymmetric roles of image and text modalities and the relational nature of vision-language representations.To address this issue, we propose ARG-Attack, an optimization-based framework that learns universal perturbations under an asymmetric relational-geometry driven objective.Our method integrates three complementary components: a cosine-based loss that induces directional semantic drift in visual features, a center shift loss that geometrically regularizes adversarial embeddings toward a shared semantic center, and a relational polarity loss that explicitly disrupts image–text matching relationships.Together, these objectives enable effective cross-modal interaction without relying on model-specific training losses or probabilistic distribution matching.In addition, we adopt an adaptive gradient update strategy inspired by Adam optimization to stabilize training and accelerate convergence.Extensive experiments across multiple vision-language models and tasks demonstrate that ARG-Attack achieves competitive white-box performance and significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in black-box transfer settings.

Abstract:
Anonymizing textual documents is a highly context-sensitive problem: the appropriate balance between privacy protection and utility preservation varies with the data domain, privacy objectives, and downstream application. However, existing anonymization methods rely on static, manually designed strategies that lack the flexibility to adjust to diverse requirements and often fail to generalize across domains. We introduce adaptive text anonymization, a new task formulation in which anonymization strategies are automatically adapted to specific privacy–utility requirements. We propose a framework for task-specific prompt optimization that automatically constructs anonymization instructions for language models, enabling adaptation to different privacy goals, domains, and downstream usage patterns. To evaluate our approach, we present a benchmark spanning five datasets with diverse domains, privacy constraints, and utility objectives. Across all evaluated settings, our framework consistently achieves a better privacy–utility trade-off than existing baselines, while remaining computationally efficient and effective on open-source language models, with performance comparable to larger closed-source models. Additionally, we show that our method can discover novel anonymization strategies that explore different points along the privacy–utility trade-off frontier.

Abstract:
Masked diffusion models (MDMs), which leverage bidirectional attention and a denoising process, are narrowing the performance gap with autoregressive models (ARMs). However, their internal attention mechanisms remain under-explored. This paper investigates the attention behaviors in MDMs, revealing the phenomenon of Attention Floating. Unlike ARMs, where attention converges to a fixed sink, MDMs exhibit dynamic, dispersed attention anchors that shift across denoising steps and layers. Further analysis reveals its Shallow Structure-Aware, Deep Content-Focused attention mechanism: shallow layers utilize floating tokens to build a global structural framework, while deeper layers allocate more capability toward capturing semantic content. Empirically, this distinctive attention pattern provides a mechanistic explanation for the strong in-context learning capabilities of MDMs, allowing them to double the performance compared to ARMs in knowledge-intensive tasks. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Attention-Floating .

Abstract:
Mock trial has long served as an important platform for professional legal training and education. Traditional mock trials are difficult to access by the public because they rely on professional tutors and human participants. Fortunately, the rise of large language models (LLMs) provides new opportunities for creating more accessible and scalable court simulations. While promising, existing research ignored the systematic design and procedure evaluation of court simulations, which are critical to the credibility and usage of court simulation in practice. To this end, we propose a novel court simulation paradigm, i.e. SimCourt, based on the real-world procedure structure of Chinese courts, and design a comprehensive evaluation framework focusing on both legal judgment prediction and court procedure analysis. Experiments show that our framework can generate simulated trials that better guide the system in predicting the imprisonment, probation, and fine of each case. Further procedure evaluations show that agents’ responses under our simulation framework even outperform judges and lawyers from the real trials in many aspects. These demonstrate the potential of LLM-based court simulation.

Abstract:
Reward models (RMs) play a critical role in aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. Yet in the domain of tool learning, the lack of RMs specifically designed for function-calling tasks has limited progress toward more capable agentic AI. We introduce ToolRM, a family of lightweight reward models tailored for general tool-use scenarios. To build these models, we propose a novel pipeline that constructs high-quality pairwise preference data using rule-based scoring and multidimensional sampling. This yields ToolPref-Pairwise-30K, a diverse, balanced, and challenging preference dataset that supports both generative and discriminative reward modeling. We also introduce TRBench BFCL , a benchmark built on the agent evaluation suite BFCL to evaluate RMs on tool calling tasks. Trained on our constructed data, models from the Qwen3-4B/8B series achieve up to 17.94% higher accuracy, substantially outperforming frontier LLMs and RMs in pairwise reward judgments. Beyond training objectives, generative ToolRM generalizes to broader critique tasks, including Best-of-N sampling and self-correction. Experiments on ACEBench highlight its effectiveness and efficiency, enabling inference-time scaling while reducing output token usage by over 66%. Its support for downstream RL training further validates its practical utility. We release data to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents for machine learning engineering (MLE) predominantly rely on tree search, a form of gradient-free optimization that uses scalar validation scores to rank candidates. As LLM reasoning capabilities improve, exhaustive enumeration becomes increasingly inefficient compared to directed updates, analogous to how accurate gradients enable efficient descent over random search. We introduce Gome, an MLE agent that operationalizes gradient-based optimization. Gome maps structured diagnostic reasoning to gradient computation, success memory to momentum, and multi-trace execution to distributed optimization. Under a closed-world protocol that isolates architectural effects from external knowledge, Gome achieves a state-of-the-art 35.1% any-medal rate on MLE-Bench with a restricted 12-hour budget on a single V100 GPU. Scaling experiments across 10 models reveal a critical crossover: with weaker models, tree search retains advantages by compensating for unreliable reasoning through exhaustive exploration; as reasoning capability strengthens, gradient-based optimization progressively outperforms, with the gap widening at frontier-tier models. Given the rapid advancement of reasoning-oriented LLMs, this positions gradient-based optimization as an increasingly favorable paradigm. We release our codebase and GPT-5 traces at: https://github.com/microsoft/RD-Agent .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a popular interface for human–AI interaction, supporting information seeking and task assistance through natural, multi-turn dialogue. To respond to users within multi-turn dialogues, the context-dependent user intent evolves across interactions, requiring contextual interpretation, query reformulation, and dynamic coordination between retrieval and generation. Existing studies usually follow static “rewrite, retrieve, and generate” pipelines, which optimize different procedures separately and overlook the mixed-initiative action optimization simultaneously. Although the recent developments in deep search agents demonstrate the effectiveness in jointly optimizing retrieval and generation via reasoning, these approaches focus on single-turn scenarios, which might lack the ability to handle multi-turn interactions. We introduce a conversational agent that interleaves search and reasoning across turns, enabling exploratory and adaptive behaviors learned through reinforcement learning (RL) training with tailored rewards towards evolving user goals. The experimental results across four widely used conversational benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods by surpassing several existing strong baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent dialogue, but prior works lack situational grounding, dynamic strategy control, and evaluation aligned with clinical standards in motivational interviewing (MI). We introduce StoryMI, a multi-LLM agent framework for controllable MI dialogue generation, where questionnaire-based client profiles are expanded into situational stories that provide narrative context for the dialogue. Therapist and client agents generate MI-coded utterances guided by MI codes selected by the interaction agent, while an interaction agent dynamically coordinates exchanges to control MI strategies during a multi-turn conversation. We propose a two-level evaluation protocol: lexical metrics and MI-specific measures of macro-level counseling strategies, alongside LLM-as-judge and human expert assessments. We construct a dataset of 6K simulated MI dialogues grounded in 1K questionnaire-story pairs, covering 12 MI codes and 13 symptom domains, and benchmark six open- and closed-source LLMs. Our results show that situational grounding and macro-level control can improve MI adherence and clinical plausibility, demonstrating the effectiveness of a structured multi-agent workflow for psychotherapy dialogue generation. We provide code and data for reproducibility.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) can answer questions and summarize documents when conditioned on external contexts (e.g., retrieved evidence), yet context use remains unreliable: models may overwrite an already-correct output (neutral regression) even when the context is non-informative. We formalize neutral regression as a do-no-harm requirement and quantify it by measuring accuracy drops on baseline-correct items under answer-consistent contexts. We propose No-Worse Context-Aware Decoding (NWCAD), a decode-time adapter built on a two-stream setup with a two-stage gate: it backs off to no-context decoding when the context is non-informative, and otherwise uses context-conditioned decoding with a contrastive fallback under uncertainty. We evaluate NWCAD on benchmarks that separate do-no-harm reliability from context utilization (accuracy gains on genuinely helpful contexts). NWCAD prevents neutral regression on baseline-correct items while preserving strong context-driven accuracy on helpful contexts.

Abstract:
This paper presents ltzGLUE, the first Natural Language Understanding (NLU) benchmark for Luxembourgish (LTZ) based on the popular GLUE benchmark for English. Although NLU tasks are available for many european languages nowadays, LTZ is one of the official national languages that is often overlooked. We introduce new tasks and reuse existing ones to introduce the first official NLU benchmark and accompanying evaluation of encoder models for the language. Our tasks include common natural language processing tasks in binary and multi-class classification settings, including named entity recognition, topic classification, and intent classification. We evaluate various pre-trained language models for LTZ to present an overview of the current capabilities of these models on the LTZ language.

Abstract:
Unsupervised methods are widely used to induce latent semantic structure from large text collections, yet their outputs often contain incoherent, redundant, or poorly grounded clusters that are difficult to validate without labeled data. We propose a reasoning-based refinement framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) not as embedding generators, but as semantic judges that validate and restructure the outputs of arbitrary unsupervised clustering algorithms. Our framework introduces three reasoning stages: (i) coherence verification, where LLMs assess whether cluster summaries are supported by their member texts; (ii) redundancy adjudication, where candidate clusters are merged or rejected based on semantic overlap; and (iii) label grounding, where clusters are assigned interpretable labels through a two-stage process that generates and consolidates semantically similar labels in a fully unsupervised manner. This design decouples representation learning from structural validation and mitigates the common failure modes of embedding-only approaches. We evaluate the framework in real-world social media corpora from two platforms with distinct interaction models, demonstrating consistent improvements in cluster coherence and human-aligned labeling quality over classical topic models and recent representation-based baselines. Human evaluation shows strong agreement with LLM-generated labels, despite the absence of gold-standard annotations. We further conduct robustness analysis under matched temporal and volume conditions to assess cross-platform stability. Beyond empirical gains, our results suggest that LLM-based reasoning can serve as a general mechanism for validating and refining unsupervised semantic structure, enabling more reliable and interpretable analysis of large text collections without supervision.

Abstract:
Can small language models achieve strong tool-use performance without complex adaptation mechanisms? This paper investigates this question through Meta-Tool, a controlled empirical study comparing hypernetwork-based LoRA adaptation against carefully designed few-shot prompting. Using a Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct backbone, we evaluate four adaptation mechanisms—few-shot prompting, documentation encoding, hypernetwork-generated LoRA weights, and value-guided beam search—across four diverse benchmarks: Gorilla APIBench, Spider 2.0, WebArena, and InterCode. Our central finding is a well-supported negative result: despite generating non-trivial weight matrices, the 227.8M-parameter hypernetwork provides no measurable improvement over few-shot prompting alone. Comprehensive ablation studies reveal that few-shot examples contribute +21.5% to performance and documentation contributes +5.0%, while the hypernetwork adds 0%. A 3B model with well-designed prompts achieves 79.7% of GPT-5’s average performance at 10 × lower latency. Error analysis across 722 failure cases spanning all shot counts (0–5) shows that at the 5-shot configuration (106 failures), failure modes are task-dependent: schema-heavy tasks (Spider 2.0, WebArena) show near-zero format errors with remaining failures semantic, while format errors dominate on Gorilla (100%) and InterCode (70%). These findings redirect practitioners toward prompt engineering and example curation rather than complex adaptation architectures.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems depend on non-parametric indices to access external knowledge, yet most retrieval infrastructure assumes a stationary query document distribution after index construction. In dynamic settings involving continual knowledge updates or evolving terminology, this assumption often fails, leading to degraded retrieval performance, while full re-indexing remains computationally expensive. We propose AURORA, a neuro-symbolic framework for adapting retrieval indices under distribution shift by treating index maintenance as a few-shot continual learning problem. AURORA decouples discrete index structure from continuous metric representations, enabling efficient adaptation of neural components while preserving index topology. A lightweight Bayesian routing policy further balances stability and plasticity by dynamically selecting among adaptive neural indices and static fallbacks based on uncertainty estimates. Across dense, learned sparse (SPLADE), and generative (DSI) retrieval settings, AURORA recovers up to +26.9% Recall@10 on novel topics compared to static baselines, while adapting significantly faster than full retraining (28 ms vs. 5.1 s).

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show strong potential for cross-modal understanding by integrating powerful language models with multimodal encoders. However, extending MLLMs to handle a diverse range of modalities introduces two critical and intertwined challenges: (1) the reliance on fully paired multimodal data, often scarce or costly to acquire across all modalities, and (2) the computational inefficiency from processing numerous modality tokens and requiring substantial model updates for each new modality. To address these challenges, we enable MLLMs to handle missing modalities by generating representations for absent inputs. Furthermore, recognizing that an increasing number of modalities leads to linearly scaling token counts and that lengthy generated sequences can hinder performance, we employ a dual-stage compression mechanism. It first reduces the number of tokens per modality and then condenses information from multiple modalities into a single, compact token sequence. This culminates in Flex-M 3 , a novel MLLM framework designed for flexible and efficient learning across arbitrary combinations of modalities. Experiments across diverse multimodal benchmarks and backbones demonstrate that Flex-M 3 robustly handles varied modality inputs and scales efficiently. Notably, Flex-M outperforms its counterpart trained on only full-modality data, with consistent improvements of 2.29%, 3.15%, 11.01% on multimodal reasoning tasks NExT-QA, MUSIC-AVQA, SQA3D . Moreover, Flex-M 3 demonstrates superior robustness during inference, even when a high proportion of modalities are missing from the input samples, showcasing its capacity for complex, data-scarce multimodal applications.

Abstract:
We introduce FinWorkBench (a.k.a. Finch) for evaluating AI agents on real-world, enterprise-grade finance and accounting workflows that interleave data entry, structuring, formatting, web search, cross-file retrieval, calculation, modeling, validation, translation, visualization, and reporting. Finch is sourced from authentic enterprise workspaces from Enron (15,000 files and 500,000 emails) and other financial institutions, covering the period 2000–2025 and preserving the in-the-wild messiness of multimodal artifacts such as tables and charts across diverse domains including budgeting, trading, asset management, and operational management.We propose a workflow construction process that combines LLM-assisted mining of workflows from authentic enterprise environments with expert annotation: (1) LLM-assisted, expert-verified derivation of workflows from real-world email threads and spreadsheet version histories, and (2) meticulous annotation requiring over 700 hours of expert effort. This yields 172 composite workflows with 384 tasks, involving 1,710 spreadsheets with 27 million cells, along with PDFs and other artifacts, capturing the intrinsically messy, long-horizon, knowledge-intensive, and collaborative nature of real-world enterprise work.We conduct both human and automated evaluations of frontier AI systems, including GPT 5.1, Claude Sonnet/Opus 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro, Grok 4, and Qwen 3 Max. Under human evaluation, GPT 5.1 Pro spends an average of 16.8 minutes per workflow yet passes only 38.4% of workflows. Comprehensive case studies further surface the challenges that real-world enterprise workflows pose for AI agents.

Abstract:
The advent of LLMs has given rise to generative search, a new search paradigm in which LLMs retrieve information from the web related to a query and synthesize it into a single, coherent response. This paradigm differs fundamentally from traditional web search, where results are returned as a ranked list of independent web pages. In this paper, we ask: Along what dimensions does generative search differ from traditional search?We conduct a systematic comparison between Google organic search and five generative search systems from three providers: Google, OpenAI, and Perplexity. Our analysis reveals substantial variation among engines in their reliance on internal v.s. external knowledge, source diversity, and stability. While generative systems often achieve topical coverage comparable to traditional search, they do so using markedly different retrieval footprints and synthesis strategies. We further show that the outputs of generative search can vary across time and executions, raising new challenges for robustness. Our findings demonstrate that generative search introduces new dimensions that are not captured by existing evaluation paradigms, motivating the development of evaluations that explicitly account for retrieval behavior, synthesis, and stability in generative search systems.

Abstract:
Current vision-language benchmarks predominantly feature well-structured questions with clear, explicit prompts. However, real user queries are often informal and underspecified. Users naturally leave much unsaid, relying on images to convey context. We introduce HAERAE-Vision, a benchmark of 653 real-world visual questions from Korean online communities (0.76% survival from 86K candidates), each paired with an explicit rewrite, yielding 1,306 query variants in total. Evaluating 39 VLMs, we find that even state-of-the-art models (GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro) achieve under 50% on the original queries. Crucially, query explicitation alone yields 8 to 22 point improvements, with smaller models benefiting most. We further show that even with web search, under-specified queries underperform explicit queries without search, revealing that current retrieval cannot compensate for what users leave unsaid. Our findings demonstrate that a substantial portion of VLM difficulty stem from natural query under-specification instead of model capability, highlighting a critical gap between benchmark evaluation and real-world deployment.

Abstract:
Hierarchical text classification (HTC) assigns documents to multiple levels of a pre-defined taxonomy. Automated patent subject classification represents one of the hardest HTC scenarios because of professional difficulties and extensive labels. Prior approaches only output a flat label set, which offers little insight into the reason behind predictions. Therefore, we propose Reasoning for Hierarchical Classification (RHC), a novel framework that reformulates HTC as a step-by-step reasoning task to sequentially deduce hierarchical labels. RHC trains large language models (LLMs) in two stages: a cold-start stage that aligns outputs with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning format and a reinforcement learning (RL) stage to enhance multi-step reasoning ability. RHC demonstrates four advantages in our experiments. (1) Effectiveness: RHC surpasses previous baselines and outperforms the supervised fine-tuning counterparts by approximately 3% in accuracy and macro F1. (2) Explainability: RHC produces natural-language justifications before prediction to facilitate human inspection. (3) Scalability: RHC scales favorably with model size with larger gains compared to standard fine-tuning. (4) Applicability: Beyond patents, we further demonstrate that RHC achieves state-of-the-art performance on other widely used HTC benchmarks, which highlights its broad applicability.

Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM)—an understanding of the mental states of others—is a key aspect of human social intelligence, yet, chatbots and LLM-based social agents do not typically integrate it. In this work, we demonstrate that LLMs that explicitly use ToM get better at dialogue, achieving goals more effectively. After showing that simply prompting models to generate mental states between dialogue turns already provides significant benefit, we further introduce ToMAgent (ToMA), a ToM-focused dialogue agent. ToMA is trained by pairing ToM with dialogue lookahead to produce mental states that are maximally useful for achieving dialogue goals. Experiments on the Sotopia interactive social evaluation benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of our method over a range of baselines. Extensive analysis shows that ToMA exhibits more strategic, goal-oriented reasoning behaviors, which enable long-horizon adaptation, while maintaining better relationships with their partners. Our results suggest a step forward in integrating ToM for building socially intelligent LLM agents.

Abstract:
While Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has shown promise in aligning generative AI, we present empirical evidence that it can also cause severe, systematic misalignment. We hypothesize that this stems from evaluator feedback depending on downstream outcome predictions (foresight) that can be influenced by the AI’s output, inducing Goodhart’s law dynamics. We present a theoretical analysis showing that conditioning evaluator feedback on downstream observations (hindsight) inhibits this effect by decoupling the alignment signal from potentially compromised predictions—crucially, the result holds even if the observed outcomes are sampled from the AI’s own world model. Building on this insight, we introduce Reinforcement Learning from Hindsight Simulation (RLHS), which presents plausible simulated outcomes to evaluators before eliciting feedback. We validate RLHS across three consultancy settings—marketplace interactions, restaurant recommendations, and online course advising—using both online (PPO) and offline (DPO) fine-tuning methods, and show that it substantially improves alignment over RLHF in experiments and human evaluations. We perform post-hoc benchmark evaluations on TruthfulQA, HaluEval, and TrustLLM, finding that even after single-task fine-tuning, RLHF misalignment persists, while RLHS consistently outperforms baselines and demonstrates strong out-of-domain generalization.

Abstract:
One critical challenge for large language models (LLMs) in making complex reasoning is their reliance on matching reasoning patterns from training data, instead of proactively selecting the most appropriate cognitive strategy to solve a given task. Existing approaches impose fixed cognitive structures that enhance performance in specific tasks but lack adaptability across diverse scenarios. To address this limitation, we introduce MetaScale, a test-time scaling framework based on meta-thoughts, i.e., adaptive thinking strategies tailored to each task. MetaScale initializes a pool of candidate meta-thoughts, then iteratively selects and evaluates them using a multi-armed bandit algorithm with upper confidence bound selection, guided by a reward model. To further enhance adaptability, a genetic algorithm evolves high-reward meta-thoughts, refining and extending the strategy pool over time. By dynamically proposing and optimizing meta-thoughts at inference time, MetaScale improves both accuracy and generalization across a wide range of tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that MetaScale consistently outperforms standard inference approaches, achieving an 11% performance gain in win rate on Arena-Hard with GPT-4o, improving from 82.14% to 93.14% against GPT-4. Notably, MetaScale scales more effectively with increasing sampling budgets and produces more structured, expert-level responses.

Abstract:
Distilling the capabilities from a large reasoning model (LRM) to a smaller student model often involves training on substantial amounts of reasoning data. However, knowledge distillation (KD) over lengthy sequences with prompt (P), chain-of-thought (CoT), and answer (A) sections makes the process computationally expensive. In this work, we investigate how the allocation of supervision across different sections (P, CoT, A) affects student performance. Our analysis shows that selective KD over only the CoT tokens can be effective when the prompt and answer information is encompassed by it. Building on this insight, we establish a truncation protocol to quantify computation-quality tradeoffs as a function of sequence length. We observe that beyond a specific length, longer training sequences provide marginal returns for downstream performance but require substantially higher memory and FLOPs. To this end, training on only the first 50% of tokens of every training sequence can retain, on average, ≈91% of full-sequence performance on math benchmarks while reducing training time, memory usage, and FLOPs by about 50% each. Codes are available at https://github.com/weiruichen01/distilling-the-essence.

Abstract:
The reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have improved substantially through increased test-time computation, typically in the form of intermediate tokens known as chain-of-thought (CoT). However, CoT often becomes unnecessarily long, increasing computation costs without improving accuracy and sometimes even degrading performance, a phenomenon known as “ overthinking ”. We propose a multi-stage efficient reasoning method that combines supervised fine-tuning—via rejection sampling or reasoning trace reformatting—with reinforcement learning using an adaptive length penalty. We introduce a lightweight reward function that penalizes tokens generated after the first correct answer, encouraging the model to perform self-verification only when beneficial. We conduct a holistic evaluation across seven diverse reasoning tasks, analyzing the accuracy–response length trade-off. Our approach reduces response length by an average of 28% for 8B models and 40% for 32B models, while incurring only minor performance drops of 1.6 and 2.5 points, respectively. Despite its conceptual simplicity, it achieves a better trade-off than more complex state-of-the-art efficient reasoning methods, scoring 76.6 on the area under the Overthinking-Adjusted Accuracy curve ( AUC OAA )—5 points above the base model and 2.5 points above the second-best approach.

Abstract:
AI agents operating on user interfaces must understand how interfaces communicate state and feedback to act reliably. As a core communicative modality, animations are increasingly used in modern interfaces, serving critical functional purposes beyond mere aesthetics. Thus, understanding UI animation is essential for comprehensive interface interpretation. However, recent studies of Vision Language Models (VLMs) for UI understanding have focused primarily on static screenshots, leaving it unclear how well these models handle dynamic UI animations. To address this gap, we created AniMINT, a novel dataset of 300 densely annotated UI animation videos.We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs on UI animation understanding, including their abilities to perceive the animation effects, identify animation purposes, and interpret animation meaning. Our results show that VLMs can reliably detect primitive motion.However, their high-level animation interpretation remains inconsistent, with substantial gaps relative to human performance. Finally, we use Motion, Context, and Perceptual Cues (MCPC) to probe factors affecting VLM performance, revealing key bottlenecks and directions for future improvement.

Abstract:
Generative Retrieval (GR) has emerged as a promising text-to-image paradigm, yet it suffers from limited semantic discriminability, alignment bias, and closed-set restrictions. To address these challenges, we propose SIGMA, a novel framework for Semantic Internalization for Generative Multimodal Alignment. SIGMA constructs multi-granularity hierarchical identifiers to ensure unique, semantically consistent image representations. We further introduce a progressive semantic internalization training strategy augmented with semantic soft labels, which captures fine-grained text-image affinities and enables inductive identifier assignment for unseen samples realizing open-set dynamic indexing capabilities. Experiments on the Flickr30K and MS-COCO datasets demonstrate that SIGMA outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving average Recall@1, Recall@5, and Recall@10 improvements of 10.65%, 8.50%, and 7.00%, respectively.

Abstract:
Parallel scaling has emerged as a powerful paradigm to enhance reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) by generating multiple Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces simultaneously. However, this approach introduces significant computational inefficiency due to inter-trace redundancy—our analysis reveals that over 80% of parallel reasoning traces yield identical final answers, representing substantial wasted computation. To address this critical efficiency bottleneck, we propose DeepPrune, a novel framework that enables efficient parallel scaling through dynamic pruning. Our method features a specialized judge model trained with oversampling techniques to accurately predict answer equivalence from partial reasoning traces, achieving 0.7072 AUROC on equivalence prediction across unseen reasoning models. This is combined with an online greedy clustering algorithm that dynamically prunes redundant paths while preserving answer diversity. Comprehensive evaluations across three challenging benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, and GPQA) and multiple reasoning models demonstrate that DeepPrune achieves remarkable token reduction ranging from 65.73% to 88.50% compared to conventional consensus sampling, while maintaining competitive accuracy within 3.4 percentage points. Our work establishes a new standard for efficient parallel reasoning, making high-performance reasoning more efficient. Our code and data are here: https://github.com/THU-KEG/DeepPrune/

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are commonly used as evaluators in various applications, but the reliability of the outcomes remains a challenge. One such challenge is using LLMs-as-judges for direct assessment, i.e., assigning scores from a specified range without any references. Using summarization as our primary testbed, we first show that this challenge stems from LLM judge outputs being associated with score range bias, i.e., LLM judge outputs are highly sensitive to pre-defined score ranges. We also show that similar biases exist among models from the same family. We then mitigate this bias through contrastive decoding, achieving up to 11.7% relative improvement in Spearman correlation with human judgments, averaged across score ranges.

Abstract:
Despite their strong generative capabilities, large language models frequently exhibit hallucinations, particularly due to outside-boundary confidence where incorrect assertions are produced with high statistical certainty. Existing approaches commonly use output probability as a proxy for truthfulness; however, this signal is confounded by epistemic uncertainty and cannot reliably distinguish genuine uncertainty from fabricated content. We argue that effective hallucination detection requires integrating surface-level confidence with signals that reflect the model’s underlying epistemic state. To this end, we propose Answer-level Intrinsic Cognition (AIC), a model-agnostic metric that captures epistemic boundary deviations by measuring answer-level stability across multiple stochastic forward passes. By coupling AIC with conventional output uncertainty, we derive a composite metric that disentangles within-boundary uncertainty from outside-boundary confidence. Across three public question-answering benchmarks and diverse model scales, the two-dimensional score consistently outperforms strong uncertainty-only baselines, with larger gains on adversarially constructed hallucination sets. The code is available at: https://github.com/HXYfighter/AIC-ACL2026.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in code generation, yet their application to Property-Based Testing (PBT) remains fraught with a superficiality gap. While LLMs can readily generate syntactically correct tests, they often struggle to bridge the semantic gap between code implementation and its intended invariant logic, resulting in weak properties that provide a false sense of security. To address this, we introduce PROBE, an agentic framework that hardens software properties through Adversarial Refinement. Unlike traditional generation approaches, PROBE treats test generation as a game of semantic asymmetry: it employs a Validator agent to actively generate counter-implementations, which are semantically incorrect codes that satisfy the generated property, to expose loopholes in the specification. Furthermore, PROBE constructs a cross-functional semantic graph to capture deep dependencies often missed by local analysis. Extensive evaluation reveals that PROBE increases mutation scores by 9.79% over baselines. In real-world deployment, PROBE identified 45 previously unknown bugs in top-tier libraries that have been confirmed by developers, demonstrating its ability to uncover deep semantic defects.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate factually inaccurate content even if they have corresponding knowledge, which critically undermines their reliability. Existing approaches attempt to mitigate this by incorporating uncertainty in QA prompt during training, but these numerical scores lack the semantic richness for LLM to properly understand its internal states of trustworthiness and honestness, leading to insufficient factuality alignment. We introduce FAITH (Factuality Alignment through Integrating Trustworthiness and Honestness), a post-training framework for factuality alignment that integrates natural-language uncertainty signals with external knowledge. Specifically, we augment training datasets by computing confidence scores and semantic entropy from LLM outputs and mapping them into a knowledge state quadrant that describes the model’s internal knowledge possession (trustworthiness) and answering behaviors (honestness) in natural language. Based on this enhanced data, we design a reward function that considers both correctness and uncertainty signals, and fine-tune the LLM using the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm. To further mitigate weakly grounded responses, we design a retrieval-augmented module that retrieves relevant external passages, improving the consistency between internal and external knowledge representations. Extensive experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks demonstrate that FAITH enhances the factual accuracy and truthfulness of LLMs.

Abstract:
Recognizing whether outputs from large language models (LLMs) contain faithfulness hallucination is crucial for real-world applications, e.g., retrieval-augmented generation and summarization. In this paper, we introduce FaithLens, a cost-efficient and effective faithfulness hallucination detection model that can jointly provide binary predictions and corresponding explanations to improve trustworthiness. To achieve this, we first synthesize training data with explanations via advanced LLMs and apply a well-defined data filtering strategy to ensure label correctness, explanation quality, and data diversity. Subsequently, we fine-tune the model on these well-curated training data as a cold start and further optimize it with rule-based reinforcement learning, using rewards for both prediction correctness and explanation quality. Results on 12 diverse tasks show that the 8B-parameter FaithLens outperforms advanced models such as GPT-5.2 and o3. Also, FaithLens can produce high-quality explanations, delivering a distinctive balance of trustworthiness, efficiency, and effectiveness.

Abstract:
Social intelligence, the ability to navigate complex interpersonal interactions, presents a fundamental challenge for language agents. Training such agents via reinforcement learning requires solving the credit assignment problem: determining how individual utterances contribute to multi-turn dialogue outcomes. Existing approaches directly employ language models to distribute episode-level rewards, yielding attributions that are retrospective and lack theoretical grounding. We propose SAVOIR (ShApley Value fOr SocIal RL), a novel principled framework grounded in cooperative game theory. Our approach combines two complementary principles: expected utility shifts evaluation from retrospective attribution to prospective valuation, capturing an utterance’s strategic potential for enabling favorable future trajectories; Shapley values ensure fair credit distribution with axiomatic guarantees of efficiency, symmetry, and marginality. Experiments on the SOTOPIA benchmark demonstrate that SAVOIR achieves new state-of-the-art performance across all evaluation settings, with our 7B model matching or exceeding proprietary models including GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. Notably, even large reasoning models consistently underperform, suggesting social intelligence requires qualitatively different capabilities than analytical reasoning.

Abstract:
Languages encode distinct abstractions and inductive priors, yet most large language models (LLMs) overlook this diversity by reasoning in a single dominant language. In this work, we introduce x1, a family of reasoning models that can adaptively reason in an advantageous language on a per-instance basis. To isolate the effect of reasoning-language choice, x1 is constructed without expanding the model’s knowledge boundaries and is trained by contrasting linguistically distinct reasoning trajectories for the same input. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the benefits of adaptive multilingual reasoning across multilingual mathematical reasoning and culturally grounded tasks. Moreover, our results challenge a simplistic view of scaling laws: while scaling reduces cross-lingual disparities in procedural domains such as math reasoning, it does not eliminate the advantages of culture-associated languages in culturally grounded tasks, as we empirically show that such reasoning enables more efficient and accurate cultural knowledge recall. Overall, our findings establish language choice as a functional component of reasoning, with implications for building more generalist and globally competent reasoning models.

Abstract:
Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs), such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO), have emerged as efficient alternatives to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) algorithms for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. However, DAAs suffer from a fundamental limitation we identify as the “reward-generation gap”—a discrepancy between training objectives and autoregressive decoding dynamics. In this paper, we consider that one contributor to the reward-generation gap is the mismatch between the inherent importance of prefix tokens during the LLM generation process and how this importance is reflected in the implicit reward functions of DAAs. To bridge the gap, we adopt a token-level MDP perspective of DAAs to analyze its limitations and introduce a simple yet effective approach called Prefix-Oriented Equal-length Training (POET), which truncates both preferred and dispreferred responses to match the shorter one’s length. We conduct experiments with DPO and SimPO, two representative DAAs, demonstrating that POET improves over their standard implementations, achieving up to 11.8 points in AlpacaEval 2 and overall improvements across downstream tasks. These results underscore the need to mitigate the reward-generation gap in DAAs by better aligning training objectives with autoregressive decoding dynamics.

Abstract:
Unstructured model editing aims to update models with real-world text, yet existing methods often memorize text holistically without reliable fine-grained fact access. To address this, we propose FABLE, a hierarchical framework that decouples fine-grained fact injection from holistic text generation. FABLE follows a two-stage, fact-first strategy: discrete facts are anchored in shallow layers, followed by minimal updates to deeper layers to produce coherent text. This decoupling resolves the mismatch between holistic recall and fine-grained fact access, reflecting the unidirectional Transformer flow in which surface-form generation amplifies rather than corrects underlying fact representations. We also introduce UnFine, a diagnostic benchmark with fine-grained question–answer pairs and fact-level metrics for systematic evaluation. Experiments show that FABLE substantially improves fine-grained question answering while maintaining state-of-the-art holistic editing performance. Our code is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FABLE-B59E.

Abstract:
With the growing adoption of Large Language Model (LLM) agents in persistent, real-world roles, they naturally encounter continuous streams of tasks and inevitable failures. A key limitation, however, is their inability to systematically learn from these mistakes, forcing them to repeat identical errors in similar contexts. Unlike prior training-free methods that primarily store raw instance-level experience or focus on retrieving successful trajectories, we propose Mistake Notebook Learning (MNL), a novel memory framework that enables agents to self-curate generalizable guidance from batch-clustered failures. This mechanism allows agents to distill shared error patterns into structured "mistake notes", updating an external memory only when batch performance improves to ensure stability. To further amplify adaptability, we integrate MNL with test-time scaling, leveraging aggregated failure patterns to actively steer the search process away from known pitfalls. Experiments on mathematical reasoning, Text-to-SQL, and interactive agent benchmarks show that MNL achieves competitive performance compared to existing memory mechanisms in both effectiveness and efficiency. These findings position structured mistake abstraction as a critical lever for robust agent evolution, enabling continuous improvement without the cost of parameter updates.

Abstract:
Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in video understanding tasks, yet their robustness under conversational interaction remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we identify spatiotemporal sycophancy, a failure mode in which Vid-LLMs retract initially correct, visually grounded judgments and conform to misleading user feedback under negation-based gaslighting. Rather than merely changing their answers, the models often fabricate unsupported temporal or spatial explanations to justify incorrect revisions. To systematically investigate this phenomenon, we propose a negation-based gaslighting evaluation framework and introduce GasVideo-1000, a curated benchmark designed to probe spatiotemporal sycophancy with clear visual grounding and temporal reasoning requirements. We evaluate a broad range of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary Vid-LLMs across diverse video understanding tasks. Extensive experiments reveal that vulnerability to negation-based gaslighting is pervasive and severe, even among models with strong baseline performance. While prompt-level grounding constraints can partially mitigate this behavior, they do not reliably prevent hallucinated justifications or belief reversal. Our results indicate that current Vid-LLMs lack robust mechanisms for maintaining grounded spatiotemporal beliefs under adversarial conversational feedback.

Abstract:
Reasoning language models generate long reasoning traces that increase latency and cost. We study how to shorten these traces while preserving accuracy on competition-level mathematics. In a teacher-student distillation setup, we compare three approaches: (i) inference-time truncation after the first k tokens, (ii) Implicit Chain-of-Thought (ICoT)-style curricula that progressively shorten the teacher trace during training, and (iii) direct distillation to shorter reasoning traces. Using NuminaMath 1.5 with traces from DeepSeek-R1 and QwQ-32B, we distill into Qwen2.5-7B and measure accuracy against total tokens generated. We find: (1) with standard SFT and first- k truncation, models compensate by generating longer text after reasoning, undermining token savings; (2) ICoT-style curricula provide little benefit on competition-level mathematics, where reasoning traces are long and diverse; and (3) training on post-think, text the teacher generates after reasoning, achieves the best accuracy–efficiency trade-off among all shortened targets, outperforming generic summaries at matched token budgets. These results show that curriculum-based internalization methods effective on simple tasks do not transfer to complex reasoning, and that post-think provides a better distillation target.

Abstract:
Understanding and reasoning with abstractive information from the visual modality presents significant challenges for current multi-modal large language models (MLLMs). Among the various forms of abstractive information, Multi-Modal Relational Knowledge (MMRK), which represents abstract relational structures between multi-modal entities using node-edge formats, remains largely under-explored. In particular, STructured and Abstractive Reasoning (STAR) on such data has received little attention from the research community. To bridge the dual gaps in large-scale high-quality data and capability enhancement methodologies, this paper makes the following key contributions: (i). An automatic STAR data engine to synthesize images with MMRK to build multi-modal instructions with reliable chain-of-thought thinking for various STAR tasks and (ii). A comprehsive two-stage training framework, accompanied by knowledge-informed GRPO and a suite of evaluation protocols tailored to different STAR tasks. Based upon these contributions, we introduce STAR-64K, a dataset comprising 64K high-quality multi-modal instruction samples, and conduct experiments across 8 open-source MLLMs. Experimental results show that our two-stage enhancement framework enables smaller 3B/7B models to significantly outperform GPT-4o in STAR. Additionally, we provide in-depth analysis regarding the effectiveness of various designs, data transferability, and scalability.

Abstract:
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in the medical domain. However, existing medical benchmarks suffer from performance saturation and are predominantly derived from medical exam questions, which fail to reflect the complexity of real-world clinical scenarios.To bridge this gap, we introduce ClinBench, a challenging benchmark based on authentic clinical cases sourced from authoritative medical journals. Each question retains the complete patient information and clinical test results from the original case, effectively simulating real-world clinical practice. Additionally, we implement a rigorous human review process involving medical experts to ensure the quality and reliability of the benchmark. ClinBench supports both textual and multimodal evaluation formats, covering 11 medical specialties with over 2,000 questions, including a dedicated rare disease track, providing a comprehensive resource for assessing the medical reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We evaluate the performance of over 20 open-source and proprietary LLMs and benchmark them against human medical experts. Our findings reveal that human experts still retain an advantage within their specialized fields, while LLMs demonstrate superior overall performance on a broader range of medical specialties.

Abstract:
Agentic search has recently emerged as a powerful paradigm, where an agent interleaves multi-step reasoning with on-demand retrieval to solve complex questions. Despite its success, how to design a retriever for agentic search remains largely underexplored. Existing search agents typically rely on similarity-based retrievers, while similar passages are not always useful for final answer generation. In this paper, we propose a novel retriever training framework tailored for agentic search. Unlike retrievers designed for single-turn retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) that only rely on local passage utility, we propose to use both local query-passage relevance and global answer correctness to measure passage utility in a multi-turn agentic search. We further introduce an iterative training strategy, where the search agent and the retriever are optimized bidirectionally and iteratively. Different from RAG retrievers that are only trained once with fixed questions, our retriever is continuously improved using evolving and higher-quality queries from the agent. Extensive experiments on seven single-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that our retriever, termed Agentic-R, consistently outperforms strong baselines across different search agents.

Abstract:
Recently, various excellent and powerful large language models (LLMs) have been utilized to solve a wide range of human problems. However, when faced with complex problems, most users are often unable to provide accurate and effective prompts to interact with LLMs, thus limiting their performance. To address this challenge, we propose Prompt-R1, an end-to-end reinforcement learning framework that utilizes a small-scale LLM (as agent ) to collaborate with large-scale LLMs (as environment ), replacing users to interact better. This collaboration is presented as a multi-turn interaction, where the small-scale LLM thinks and generates prompts, and the large-scale LLM performs complex reasoning. A double-constrained reward is designed to optimize correctness and quality of generation. Prompt-R1 provides a plug-and-play framework that supports both inference and training with various large-scale LLMs. Experimental results on twelve datasets show that Prompt-R1 significantly outperforms baseline LLMs across various tasks.Our code is available at https://github.com/QwenQKing/Prompt-R1.

Abstract:
LLMs struggle with Semantic Inertia: the inability to inhibit pre-trained priors (e.g., “Lava is Dangerous”) when dynamic, in-context rules contradict them. We probe this phenomenon using , where physical laws are mutable text rules, enabling precise evaluation of models’ ability to override learned priors when rules change. We quantatively observe that larger models can exhibit inverse scaling: they perform worse than smaller models when natural language reasoning requires suppressing pre-trained associations (e.g., accepting “Lava is Safe”). Our analysis attributes this to natural language encoding, which entangles descriptive semantics and logical rules, leading to persistent hallucinations of familiar physics despite explicit contradictory rules. Here we show that representing dynamics as executable code, rather than descriptive text, reverses this trend and enables effective prior inhibition. We introduce LCV, which fine-tunes models on counterfactual pairs and identifies states with contradictory rules, thereby forcing attention to logical constraints rather than visual semantics. This training-time approach outperforms expensive inference-time search methods in both efficiency and accuracy. Our results demonstrate that representation fundamentally determines whether scaling improves or impairs contextual reasoning. This challenges the assumption that larger models are universally better, with implications for domains that require dynamic overriding of learned priors.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) enable zero-shot and few-shot multi-label text classification via in-context learning, yet most approaches perform static inference and degrade under streaming test data due to distribution shift and long-tail labels. We study online test-time adaptation for LLM-based multi-label generation without any parameter updates, and identify two bottlenecks: (1) standard generation probabilities provide unreliable confidence because they ignore label competition at key decoding branches; (2) naive confidence-based caching overfits to frequent and easy examples, reducing label coverage and diversity. We propose SCOTTA, a structured confidence-guided online adaptation framework. SCOTTA introduces Label-set Local Likelihood Ratio (L3R), a label-level confidence measure that compares a target label against its valid competitors at critical decision positions. Using L3R as a unified signal, SCOTTA maintains an in-context exemplar cache via streaming submodular maximization, balancing label coverage, semantic diversity, and sample quality under a fixed context budget. Across four benchmarks, SCOTTA consistently improves Micro-F1 and Macro-F1 over strong LLM and non-LLM baselines, with the largest gains on long-tail labels.

Abstract:
Recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL) have improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). However, the widely used Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) consistently suffers from entropy collapse, causing the policy to converge prematurely and lose diversity. Existing exploration methods introduce additional bias or variance during exploration, making it difficult to maintain optimization stability. We propose Unified Entropy Control for Reinforcement Learning (UEC-RL), a framework that provides targeted mechanisms for exploration and stabilization. UEC-RL activates more exploration on difficult prompts to search for potential and valuable reasoning trajectories. In parallel, a stabilizer prevents entropy from growing uncontrollably, thereby keeping training stable as the model consolidates reliable behaviors. Together, these components expand the search space when needed while maintaining robust optimization throughout training. Experiments on both LLM and VLM reasoning tasks show consistent gains over RL baselines on both Pass@1 and Pass@ k . On Geometry3K, UEC-RL achieves a 37.9% relative improvement over GRPO, indicating that it sustains effective exploration without compromising convergence and underscoring UEC-RL as a key for scaling RL-based reasoning in large models. Our code is available at https://github.com/597358816/UEC-RL .

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) efficiently trains large models by using sparse activation to lower costs, selecting a few experts based on data characteristics. For MoE, an unbalanced expert load will lead to inefficient expert utilization and routing collapse. Existing methods commonly achieve an expert-centered balancing strategy to solve it, prioritizing equal utilization of experts over semantic alignment between tokens and experts. However, this can lead to a pseudo-balance phenomenon: To ensure expert load balancing, the same input is randomly routed to different experts across training steps instead of the most matching one. It introduces two critical issues: (1) Severe knowledge overlap among experts, resulting in redundant representations and inefficient parameter utilization. (2) Difficulty in forming and stabilizing expert specialization. These issues limit the scalability of models, especially large language models (LLM). To address these limitations, we introduce Memory-Aware Routing (MAR), a training-phase approach that enhances existing load-balancing strategies. By equipping each expert with a memory buffer, our method explicitly models their long-term preferences, allowing historical experience to guide routing. This ensures that tokens are routed more consistently to compatible experts, mitigating the pseudo-balance problem while maintaining global load balance and fostering expert specialization. Experimental results show that MAR improves expert specialization by 35% and downstream accuracy by 2%-25%, doubles parameter efficiency, and matches baseline performance with only half the experts.

Abstract:
Masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) have recently emerged as a new paradigm in language modeling, offering flexible generation dynamics and enabling efficient parallel decoding. However, existing decoding strategies for pre-trained MDLMs predominantly rely on token-level uncertainty criteria, while largely overlooking sequence-level information and inter-token dependencies. To address this limitation, we propose D ependency- O riented S ampler (DOS), a training-free decoding strategy that leverages inter-token dependencies to inform token updates during generation. Specifically, DOS exploits attention matrices from transformer blocks to approximate inter-token dependencies, emphasizing information from unmasked tokens when updating masked positions. Empirical results demonstrate that DOS consistently achieves superior performance on both code generation and mathematical reasoning tasks. Moreover, DOS can be seamlessly integrated with existing parallel sampling methods, leading to improved generation efficiency without sacrificing generation quality.

Abstract:
Dunhuang art, a cornerstone of global heritage, demands fine-grained visual perception anchored by specialized cultural knowledge. Given the strong performance of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on generic multimodal benchmarks, to what extent can they understand artifacts from Dunhuang art that are grounded in cultural context? To this end, we construct Dunhuang-Bench, a large-scale benchmark comprising 486 images and 22,970 QA pairs. It incorporates diverse task formats to evaluate MLLMs’ cultural understanding: Question Answering with Text Description, Multi-turn Dialogue, and Question Answering with Choices. Guided by Panofsky’s theory of iconology, we design two tasks including visual perception and knowledge reasoning for the evaluation of content understanding. In addition, we follow the theory of formal analytic tradition to design another task of artistic appreciation in our Dunhuang-Bench. Extensive evaluations of 20 mainstream MLLMs on Dunhuang-Bench reveal a consistent performance drop from perception and appreciation to reasoning. Moreover, CoT and few-shot prompting show marginal or negative impact, highlighting the limits of prompting-based improvements. Dunhuang-Bench thus provides a challenging benchmark for advancing multimodal cultural understanding. Data and code will be publicly available.

Abstract:
The image geolocalization task aims to predict the location where an image was taken anywhere on Earth using visual clues.Existing large vision-language model (LVLM) approaches leverage world knowledge, chain-of-thought reasoning, and agentic capabilities, but overlook a common strategy used by humans — using maps.In this work, we first equip the model Thinking with Map ability and formulate it as an agent-in-the-map loop.We develop a two-stage optimization scheme for it, including agentic reinforcement learning (RL) followed by parallel test-time scaling (TTS).The RL strengthens the agentic capability of model to improve sampling efficiency, and the parallel TTS enables the model to explore multiple candidate paths before making the final prediction, which is crucial for geolocalization.To evaluate our method on up-to-date and in-the-wild images, we further present MAPBench, a comprehensive geolocalization training and evaluation benchmark composed entirely of real-world images.Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing open- and closed-source models on most metrics, specifically improving Acc@500m from 8.0% to 22.1% compared to Gemini-3-Pro with Google Search/Map grounded mode.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based agents have been successfully deployed in many tool-augmented settings, but their scalability is fundamentally constrained by context length. Existing context-folding methods mitigate this issue by summarizing past interactions, yet they are typically designed for single-query or single-intent scenarios. In more realistic user-centric dialogues, we identify two major failure modes: (i) they irreversibly discard fine-grained constraints and intermediate facts that are crucial for later decisions, and (ii) their summaries fail to track evolving user intent, leading to omissions and erroneous actions. To address these limitations, we propose U-Fold, a dynamic context-folding framework tailored to user-centric tasks. U-Fold retains the full user–agent dialogue and tool-call history but, at each turn, uses two core components to produce an intent-aware, evolving dialogue summary and a compact, task-relevant tool log. Extensive experiments on 𝜏 -bench, 𝜏 2 -bench, VitaBench, and harder context-inflated settings show that U-Fold consistently outperforms ReAct (achieving a 71.4% win rate in long-context settings) and prior folding baselines (with improvements of up to 27.0%), particularly on long, noisy, multi-turn tasks. Our study demonstrates that U-Fold is a promising step toward transferring context-management techniques from single-query benchmarks to realistic user-centric applications.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have increasingly supported omni-modal processing across text, vision, and speech. However, existing evaluation frameworks for such models suffer from critical limitations, including modality shortcuts and biased reasoning paths. To address these challenges, we propose OMHBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate omni-modal multi-hop reasoning. It consists of 6,144 questions with balanced reasoning paths that are jointly grounded across all three modalities. Extensive evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art models reveals that (1) a large performance gap exists between proprietary and open-source MLLMs and (2) even proprietary models exhibit high sensitivity to reasoning path variations, resulting in asymmetric omni-modal grounding. Notably, models struggle when processing the speech modality, underscoring the need for balanced, multi-hop evaluation of omni-modal intelligence.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) can refine the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), but critically depends on a key prerequisite: the LLM can already generate high-utility reasoning paths with non-negligible probability. For tasks beyond the LLM’s current competence, such reasoning path can be hard to sample, and learning risks reinforcing familiar but suboptimal reasoning. We are motivated by the insight from cognitive science that Why is this the answer is often an easier question than What is the answer, as it avoids the heavy cognitive load of open-ended exploration, opting instead for explanatory reconstruction—systematically retracing the reasoning that links a question to its answer. We show that LLMs can similarly leverage answers to derive high-quality reasoning paths. We formalize this phenomenon and prove that conditioning on answer provably increases the expected utility of sampled reasoning paths, thereby transforming intractable problems into learnable ones. Building on this insight, we introduce RAVR (Reference-Answer-guided Variational Reasoning), an end-to-end framework that uses answer-conditioned reasoning as a variational surrogate for question-only reasoning. Experiments across 11 benchmarks and 3 models demonstrate the effectiveness of RAVR, and analysis of the reasoning behavior shows that RAVR reduces hesitation, strengthens conclusion consolidation, and promotes problem-specific strategies in reasoning.

Abstract:
Exploratory GUI testing is essential for software quality but suffers from high manual costs. While Multi-modal Large Language Model (MLLM) agents excel in navigation, they fail to autonomously discover defects due to two core challenges: Goal-Oriented Masking, where agents prioritize task completion over reporting anomalies, and Execution-Bias Attribution, where system defects are misidentified as agent errors. To address these, we first introduce GUITestBench, the first interactive benchmark for this task, featuring 143 tasks across 26 defects. We then propose GUITester, a multi-agent framework that decouples navigation from verification via two modules: (i) a Planning-Execution Module (PEM) that proactively probes for defects via embedded testing intents, and (ii) a Hierarchical Reflection Module (HRM) that resolves attribution ambiguity through interaction history analysis. GUITester achieves an F1-score of 48.90% (Pass@3) on GUITestBench, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines (33.35%). Our work demonstrates the feasibility of autonomous exploratory testing and provides a robust foundation for future GUI quality assurance.

Abstract:
Failures are inevitable when embodied agents execute complex tasks. Visual-language models (VLMs) serve as the core component of embodied agents in perceiving the environment and making decisions. Assessing the capabilities of VLMs in detecting and reasoning about failures has become increasingly important. Previous work primarily considered low-level manipulation failures (e.g., 3cm grasp offsets), neglecting high-level failures arising during long-horizon task execution (e.g., object-dropping failure in the “clean room” task) by embodied agents. In this paper, we propose FAER, a failure-aware benchmark aiming to evaluate the performance of VLMs in terms of failure detection, failure categorization, failure description, and failure correction in long-horizon tasks. FAER comprises 3,323 episodes, spanning 3 scenes, 65 tasks, and 83 objects. We assess the performance of 16 widely utilized VLMs and 4 LLMs for FAER tasks. Experimental results show that nearly all VLMs, even GPT-4o, exhibit limited performance in failure detection with a high false negative rate, meaning that they tend to ignore abnormal events, revealing notable gaps in current models’ capacity to effectively handle failures.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive linguistic fluency, yet it remains unclear whether they possess human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) or merely rely on statistical heuristics, particularly in complex social tasks such as irony comprehension. To address the limitations of existing binary benchmarks, this study establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation framework comprising 140 carefully designed probes. These probes are derived from 10 story prototypes based on established cognitive theories. The framework systematically modulates contextual contrast, linguistic cues, and cognitive mechanisms. By comparing the performance of ten state-of-the-art LLMs against 300 human participants, this study uncovers a significant dichotomy in performance. Although LLMs demonstrate superior sensitivity in subsidiary pragmatic inferences, human participants outperform them in holistic irony judgment. Crucially, the results reveal a systematic "intent-irony decoupling", wherein LLMs fail to integrate pragmatic signals into their final judgments. These models exhibit aggressive decision biases and rely on "context-utterance conflict" heuristics. These findings suggest that current LLMs simulate irony comprehension without the underlying cognitive mechanisms. The development of future artificial intelligence may require the integration of explicit ToM modules to bridge the gap between surface-level pattern matching and genuine social understanding.

Abstract:
Reinforcement fine-tuning improves the reasoning ability of large language models, but it can also encourage them to answer unanswerable queries by guessing or hallucinating missing information. Existing abstention methods either train models to produce generic refusals or encourage follow-up clarifications without verifying whether those clarifications identify the key missing information. We study queries that are clear in meaning but cannot be reliably resolved from the given information, and argue that a reliable model should not only abstain, but also explain what is missing. We propose a clarification-aware RLVR reward that, while rewarding correct answers on answerable queries, jointly optimizes explicit abstention and semantically aligned post-refusal clarification on unanswerable queries. Using this reward, we train Abstain-R1, a 3B model that improves abstention and clarification on unanswerable queries while preserving strong performance on answerable ones. Experiments on Abstain-Test, Abstain-QA, and SelfAware show that Abstain-R1 substantially improves over its base model and achieves unanswerable-query behavior competitive with larger systems including DeepSeek-R1, suggesting that calibrated abstention and clarification can be learned through verifiable rewards rather than emerging from scale alone.

Abstract:
Automated Essay Scoring (AES) faces significant challenges in cross-prompt settings, where models must generalize to unseen writing prompts. To address this limitation, we propose MAPLE, a meta-learning framework that leverages prototypical networks to learn transferable representations across different writing prompts. Across three diverse datasets (ELLIPSE and ASAP (English), and LAILA (Arabic)), MAPLE achieves state-of-the-art performance on ELLIPSE and LAILA, outperforming strong baselines by 8.5 and 3 points in QWK, respectively. On ASAP, where prompts exhibit heterogeneous score ranges, MAPLE yields improvements on several traits, highlighting the strengths of our approach in unified scoring settings. Overall, our results demonstrate the potential of meta-learning for building robust cross-prompt AES systems.

Abstract:
Emerging Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) consistently excel in mathematical and reasoning tasks, showcasing remarkable capabilities. However, the enhancement of reasoning abilities and the exposure of internal reasoning processes introduce new safety vulnerabilities. A critical question arises: when reasoning becomes intertwined with harmfulness, will LRMs become more vulnerable to jailbreaks in reasoning mode? To investigate this, we introduce HauntAttack, a novel and general-purpose black-box adversarial attack framework that systematically embeds harmful instructions into reasoning questions. Specifically, we modify key reasoning conditions in existing questions with harmful instructions, thereby constructing a reasoning pathway that guides the model step by step toward unsafe outputs. We evaluate HauntAttack on 11 LRMs and observe an average attack success rate of over 70%, achieving up to 13 percentage points of absolute improvement over the strongest prior baseline. Our further analysis reveals that even advanced safety-aligned models remain highly susceptible to reasoning-based attacks, offering insights into the urgent challenge of balancing reasoning capability and safety in future model development.

Abstract:
Predicting future clinical outcomes from electronic health records (EHR) remains challenging due to the complexity and heterogeneity of patient data. LLMs have shown strong potential for such predictive tasks, yet existing approaches mainly focus on enhancing medical knowledge through distillation or RAG while relying on the model’s internal ability to interpret contextual information. In this work, we present ReMedi (Reasoner for Medical Clinical Prediction), a framework for improving clinical outcome prediction from EHR. ReMedi generates rationale–answer pairs using a challenging sample regeneration mechanism for complex clinical questions, which leverages ground-truth answers as hints to enhance reasoning for further fine-tuning and preference tuning. ReMedi integrates ground-truth outcome guidance into the preference data construction loop, regenerating rationale-answer variants. By tuning on these rationale-answer pairs, the model improves its predictive performance. Experiments on multiple EHR prediction tasks demonstrate substantial gains of up to 19.9% over state-of-the-art baselines in terms of F1 score, underscoring ReMedi’s effectiveness in real-world clinical prediction.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made rapid progress, yet their reasoning ability often lags behind strong text-only LLMs. Bridging this gap typically requires large-scale multimodal reasoning data or reinforcement learning, incurring substantial cost. An appealing alternative is parameter-space model merging between reasoning-enhanced LLMs and MLLMs, but we show that naive merging is fragile: its effectiveness varies widely across model families and can significantly degrade performance (e.g., for Qwen-based MLLMs). We propose Directional Reasoning Injection for Fine-Tuning (DRIFT), a lightweight method that transfers reasoning knowledge in the gradient space while preserving multimodal alignment. DRIFT precomputes a reasoning prior from the parameter differences between text-only reasoning experts and multimodal models, and uses it to bias gradients during supervised fine-tuning. This design retains the simplicity of standard SFT pipelines while enabling efficient and stable reasoning transfer. Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks, including MathVista and MathVerse, show that DRIFT consistently outperforms naive merging and standard SFT, and matches or surpasses training-intensive methods with substantially lower data and compute.

Abstract:
With the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs), aligning a general-purpose model with downstream tasks through fine-tuning has become a central research focus. Selecting only high-quality examples for training has been shown to be one of the most effective ways to improve fine-tuning performance. However, prior work concentrates almost exclusively on data preprocessing: filtering and cleaning data before training begins. While the order and composition of training data during training have received little fine-grained attention. To fill this gap, our work proposed Fine-Grained Order Fine-Tuning, a fine-grained scheduling method of data order in epochs. Drawing on curriculum-learning principles, FOT defines data difficulty based on the relevance between the data and the model, and then performs dynamic scheduling of the training order in each epoch according to the difficulty. On both large-scale continued pre-training and small-scale supervised fine-tuning experiments, FOT has achieved an average 2.4% improvement over baselines. Our study offers a new perspective on data governance in the fine-tuning phase.

Abstract:
Distributional alignment enables large language models (LLMs) to predict how a target population distributes its responses across answer options, rather than collapsing disagreement into a single consensus answer. However, existing LLM-based distribution prediction is often unstable and degrades under cultural and domain shift. Token score-based estimates can change with minor option wording or formatting, response sampling-based estimates are expensive and sensitive to prompts and decoding settings, and directly generated distributions are frequently miscalibrated.We propose Evi-DA, an evidence-based alignment technique that improves the fidelity and robustness of LLM-based distribution estimation under domain and cultural shift. Given a target country and a multiple-choice question, Evi-DA retrieves related World Values Survey items and their answer distributions, predicts a coarse Welzel value signature for each option, and infers the country-conditioned answer distribution in a structured format. We train the LLMs using a two-stage pipeline, where reinforcement learning optimizes survey-derived rewards that encourage accurate intermediate value predictions, faithful final distributions, well-formed structured outputs, and reduced cultural bias. Across in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks and multiple open-source backbones, Evi-DA reduces Jensen-Shannon divergence between predicted and gold distributions relative to strong baselines, with average relative improvements of up to 44%.

Abstract:
Historical newspapers from the colonial period offer valuable evidence of how racializing language evolved over time. However, there are challenges in studying this type of historical data: 1) Data scarcity: acquiring large, annotated historical datasets is difficult, hindering the possibility of analyzing racialization comprehensively; 2) Digitized materials frequently contain Optical Character Recognition (OCR) errors and other types of noise that complicate text extraction and computational analysis; 3) Colonial newspapers are often multilingual and written in archaic prose, hindering the effectiveness of NLP tools developed for modern, single language texts. This paper addresses these challenges by conducting a dual-view, jointly studying multilingual event extraction and temporal semantic shift tasks. Specifically, we introduce a contextual question answering (CQA) and a visual question answering (VQA) derived from eighteenth- and nineteenth-century colonial newspapers. Content-wise, we focus on how enslaved people were described by enslavers as well as how they articulated their own condition through QA pairs of newspapers written in Dutch, English-French, and Spanish. Our results show that LLMs are still limited for low-resource VQA tasks. For temporal semantic change, we train temporal word embedding with a compass. The study concludes that racialization is a fluid process of linguistic recalibration where the decline of slavery merely shifted the language of control onto new categories of labor and identity.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) excels in reasoning tasks with verifiable rewards, while its adaptation to machine translation (MT) remains challenging due to the lack of unique reward signals under multiple valid translations. Existing RL approaches for MT face either fixed references in supervised settings or the production of homogeneous references leading to mode collapse in unsupervised settings. Both limitations arise from ignoring entropy dynamics in RL-based MT. The core challenge is leveraging entropy for supervision construction and self-evolution. In this paper, we propose an Entropy-Driven Unsupervised RL for MT. Our framework integrates entropy-guided sampling for exploration, confidence-weighted label generation to transcend majority-voting bias, and uncertainty-aware optimization to prioritize high-entropy tokens. These mechanisms allow reward signals to co-evolve with model proficiency beyond fixed references. Experiments across multiple language pairs show our method outperforms supervised and unsupervised baselines by +0.63 and +2.52 average points, respectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/fortunatekiss/URLMT.

Abstract:
Multimodal Named Entity Recognition relies on visual context to resolve textual ambiguities. To mitigate data scarcity, Data Augmentation (DA) has become a standard practice; however, existing methods predominantly adopt a one-size-fits-all and random perturbation paradigm, ignoring the internal state of the target model. In this paper, we first conduct a quantitative analysis, revealing that a significant portion of errors (over 30%) are model-specific, stemming from the unique biases of different architectures. To address this, we propose Memory-Guided Hard Data Augmentation, a framework designed to systematically repair these specific defects. First, we employ K-fold cross-validation to identify model-specific Hard Data. Second, we construct a Memory Tree and utilize Large Language Models (LLMs) with a clustering mechanism to induce macro-level error patterns from micro-level failures. This facilitates a paradigm shift from stateless instance-driven augmentation to a logical pattern-driven approach. Finally, we introduce an iterative augmentation mechanism that triggers recursive generation for stubborn instances that fail initial quality filters. Extensive experiments on Twitter-2015 and Twitter-2017 benchmarks demonstrate that our framework consistently yields significant performance gains across various MNER backbones.

Abstract:
Self-Consistency improves reasoning reliability through multi-sample aggregation, but incurs substantial inference cost. Adaptive self-consistency methods mitigate this issue by adjusting the sampling budget; however, they rely on count-based stopping rules that treat all responses equally, often leading to unnecessary sampling. We propose Re liability-Aware A daptive S elf- C onsistency (ReASC), which addresses this limitation by reframing adaptive sampling from response counting to evidence sufficiency, leveraging response-level confidence for principled information aggregation. ReASC operates in two stages: a single-sample decision stage that resolves instances confidently answerable from a single response, and a reliability-aware accumulation stage that aggregates responses by jointly leveraging their frequency and confidence. Across five models and four datasets, ReASC consistently achieves the best accuracy-cost trade-off compared to existing baselines, yielding improved inference efficiency across model scales from 3B to 27B parameters. As a concrete example, ReASC reduces inference cost by up to 70% relative to self-consistency while preserving accuracy on GSM8K using Gemma-3-4B-it.

Abstract:
Personality detection aims to label an individual’s traits via identifying linguistic cues from his or her written text. Previous approaches typically perform a direct mapping between text and trait labels or apply static reasoning to this task.In this paper, we argue that dynamic reasoning, underpinned by psychological theory, is essential for personality trait inference. To address this, we propose PsyPath, a novel framework that models personality detection as a process of psychologically-guided self-exploration. By enabling large language models (LLMs) to dynamically generate and answer psychologically meaningful questions, our method creates a dynamic reasoning path to explore the underlying dimensions of personality traits. This mechanism not only makes the reasoning process transparent, but also helps the model understand personality nuances in a way that mirrors expert psychological reasoning.For the "guided self-exploration", we propose a novel hybrid scoring mechanism to step-by-step evaluate the generated nodes in the reasoning paths that balances psychological coherence (black-box scoring) and model output dynamics (white-box scoring). This reasoning-based formulation inherently reflects how psychologists assess personality, as they rely on iterative, diagnostic reasoning. Experiments on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that PsyPath consistently outperforms strong baselines, yielding improvements in predictive accuracy and model interpretability.Moreover, the generated reasoning paths provide psychologically meaningful training data, significantly improving performance and psychologically grounded interpretability in downstream tasks.

Abstract:
The dominant paradigm in video retrieval relies on embedding-based full-corpus scanning, which suffers from inherent computational inefficiency and the semantic asymmetry between information-dense videos and sparse textual queries. To bridge this gap, we introduce MAVIS, a novel multi-agent framework that rethinks retrieval as cooperative reasoning rather than brute-force search. MAVIS first bridges the granularity mismatch by parsing raw videos into a Structured Semantic Library, enabling explicit attribute-level indexing. During retrieval, a planner decomposes complex user intents into atomic sub-tasks, dispatching specialized agents to independently nominate candidates. Crucially, MAVIS employs a Logic-aware Debate mechanism with a strict veto protocol, where agents collaboratively prune logical mismatches to identify a compact set of "controversial” candidates for fine-grained verification. This agentic workflow effectively bypasses the inefficiency of full-library traversal. Extensive experiments on MSR-VTT, MSVD, and ActivityNet demonstrate that MAVIS achieves competitive performance without task-specific fine-tuning, offering a scalable and interpretable alternative to traditional dual-encoder approaches.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on mathematical reasoning tasks, often attributed to their capability to generate explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations. However, recent work shows that LRMs often arrive at the correct answer before completing these textual reasoning steps, indicating the presence of latent reasoning – internal, non-verbal computation encoded in hidden states. While this phenomenon has been explored in English, its multilingual behavior remains largely unknown. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation of multilingual latent reasoning in LRMs across 11 languages. Using a truncation-based strategy, we examine how the correct answer emerges as the model is given only partial reasoning traces, allowing us to measure stepwise latent prediction formation. Our results reveal clear evidence of multilingual latent reasoning, though unevenly: strong in resource-rich languages, weaker in low-resource ones, and broadly less observable on harder benchmarks. To understand whether these differences reflect distinct internal mechanisms, we further perform representational analyses. Despite surface-level disparities, we find that the internal evolution of predictions is highly consistent across languages and broadly aligns with English – a pattern suggesting an English-centered latent reasoning pathway.

Abstract:
Probing has emerged as a promising method for monitoring large language models (LLMs), enabling cheap inference-time detection of concerning behaviours. However, natural examples of many behaviours are rare, forcing researchers to rely on synthetic or off-policy LLM responses for training probes. We systematically evaluate how off-policy data influences probe generalisation across eight distinct LLM behaviours. Testing linear and attention probes across multiple LLMs, we find that training data generation strategy can significantly affect probe performance, though the magnitude varies greatly by behaviour. The largest generalisation failures arise for behaviours defined by response “intent” (e.g., strategic deception) rather than text-level content (e.g., usage of lists). We then propose a useful test for predicting generalisation failures in cases where on-policy test data is unavailable: successful generalisation to incentivised data (where the model was coerced) strongly correlates with high performance against on-policy examples. Based on these results, we predict that current deception probes may fail to generalise to real monitoring scenarios. We find that off-policy data can yield more reliable probes than on-policy data from a sufficiently different setting. This underscores the need for better monitoring methods that handle all types of distribution shift.

Abstract:
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) into autonomous agents has expanded the scope of AI coding from localized code generation to complex, repository-level, and execution-driven problem solving. However, current benchmarks predominantly evaluate code logic in static contexts, neglecting the dynamic, full-process requirements of real-world engineering, particularly in backend development which demands rigorous environment configuration and service deployment. To address this gap, we introduce ABC-Bench, a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow. Using a scalable automated pipeline, we curated 224 practical tasks spanning 8 languages and 19 frameworks from open-source repositories. Distinct from previous evaluations, ABC-Bench require the agents to manage the entire development lifecycle from repository exploration to instantiating containerized services and pass the external end-to-end API tests. Our extensive evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle to deliver reliable performance on these holistic tasks, highlighting a substantial disparity between current model capabilities and the demands of practical backend engineering.

Abstract:
Recent Omni-multimodal Large Language Models show promise in unified audio, vision, and text modeling. However, streaming audio-video understanding remains challenging, as existing approaches suffer from disjointed capabilities: they typically exhibit incomplete modality support or lack autonomous proactive monitoring. To address this, we present ROMA, a real-time omni-multimodal assistant for unified reactive and proactive interaction. ROMA processes continuous inputs as synchronized multimodal units, aligning dense audio with discrete video frames to handle granularity mismatches. For online decision-making, we introduce a lightweight speak head that decouples response initiation from generation to ensure precise triggering without task conflict. We train ROMA with a curated streaming dataset and a two-stage curriculum that progressively optimizes for streaming format adaptation and proactive responsiveness. To standardize the fragmented evaluation landscape, we reorganize diverse benchmarks into a unified suite covering both proactive (alert, narration) and reactive (QA) settings. Extensive experiments across 12 benchmarks demonstrate ROMA achieves state-of-the-art performance on proactive tasks while competitive in reactive settings, validating its robustness in unified real-time omni-multimodal understanding. Code and benchmark are available [here](https://eureka-maggie.github.io/ROMA_show/).

Abstract:
Existing research on generative AI security is primarily driven by mutually reinforcing attack and defense methodologies grounded in empirical experience. This dynamic frequently gives rise to previously unknown attacks that can circumvent current detection and prevention. This necessitates the continual updating of security mechanisms. Constructing generative AI with provable security and theoretically controllable risk is therefore necessary. Consensus Sampling (CS) is a promising algorithm toward provably secure AI. It controls risk by leveraging overlap in model output probabilities. However, we find that CS relies on frequent abstention to avoid unsafe outputs, which reduces utility. Moreover, CS becomes highly vulnerable when unsafe models are maliciously manipulated. To address these issues, we propose a new primitive called Reliable Consensus Sampling (RCS), that traces acceptance probability to tolerate extreme adversarial behaviors, improving robustness. RCS also eliminates the need for abstention entirely. We further develop a feedback algorithm to continuously and dynamically enhance the safety of RCS. We provide theoretical guarantees that RCS maintains a controllable risk threshold. Extensive experiments show that RCS significantly improves robustness and utility while maintaining latency comparable to CS. We hope this work contributes to the development of provably secure generative AI. Our code is available at https://github.com/cuiyu-ai/RCS.

Abstract:
Large language models have achieved remarkable progress on complex reasoning tasks. However, they often implicitly fabricate information when inputs are incomplete, producing confident but unreliable conclusions—a failure mode we term ungrounded reasoning. We argue that this issue arises not from insufficient reasoning capability, but from the lack of inferential boundary awareness—the ability to recognize when the necessary premises for valid inference are missing. To address this issue, we propose Grounded Reasoning via Interactive Reinforcement Learning (GRIL), a multi-turn reinforcement learning framework for grounded reasoning under incomplete information. GRIL decomposes the reasoning process into two stages: clarify and pause, which identifies whether the available information is sufficient, and grounded reasoning, which performs task solving once the necessary premises are established. We design stage-specific rewards to penalize hallucinations, enabling models to detect gaps, stop proactively, and resume reasoning after clarification. Experiments on GSM8K-Insufficient and MetaMATH-Insufficient show that GRIL significantly improves premise detection (up to 45%), leading to a 30% increase in task success while reducing average response length by over 20%. Additional analyses confirm robustness to noisy user responses and generalization to out-of-distribution tasks.

Abstract:
Principle-based alignment often lacks context sensitivity and completeness. Grounded in Theory of Mind, we propose role conditioning as a compact alternative: social roles (e.g., mother, judge) implicitly encode both values and the cognitive schemas required to apply them. We introduce a training-free pipeline featuring a role-conditioned generator and iterative role-based critics for refinement. Across five model families, our approach consistently outperforms principle-based, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and other baselines across benchmarks. Notably, it reduces unsafe outputs on the WildJailbreak benchmark from 81.4% to 3.6% with DeepSeek-V3. Not only for common safety benchmarks, it consistently applies for agentic safety tasks. These results establish role assignment as a powerful, interpretable paradigm for AI alignment and LLM-as-a-Judge construction.

Abstract:
Large Language Model based multi-agent systems (MAS) excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors: a single faulty step can propagate across agents and disrupt the trajectory. In this paper, we present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction. MASC rethinks detection as history-conditioned anomaly scoring via two complementary designs: (1) Next-Execution Reconstruction, which predicts the embedding of the next step from the query and interaction history to capture causal consistency, and (2) Prototype-Guided Enhancement, which learns a prototype prior over normal-step embeddings and uses it to stabilize reconstruction and anomaly scoring under sparse context (e.g., early steps). When an anomaly step is flagged, MASC triggers a correction agent to revise the acting agent’s output before information flows downstream. On the Who When benchmark, MASC consistently outperforms all baselines, achieving up to 7.8% AUC-ROC improvement in the challenging w/o GT setting, and further delivers consistent gains on AgentErrorBench. When plugged into diverse MAS frameworks, it delivers consistent end-to-end gains across architectures, confirming that our metacognitive monitoring and targeted correction can mitigate error propagation with minimal overhead.

Abstract:
Aligning LLMs in low-resource multilingual settings faces a fundamental reward bottleneck: scalar rewards lack cultural generalization, while unstructured critiques remain noisy and unverifiable. To bridge this gap, we introduce a Structured Multilingual Reward Modeling Framework that extends Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to subjective and open-ended tasks. The framework unifies three core components to transform abstract quality into concrete supervision: (1) a Structured Checklist Schema decomposing evaluation into granular universal reasoning steps and task-specific criteria; (2) Structured Generative Critique Modeling, which produces rubric-aligned critiques with grounded justifications; and (3) Adaptive Multilingual Reward Optimization, integrating reasoning quality and language consistency into a verifiable objective. We integrate this framework into a bootstrapped Group Relative Policy Optimization pipeline, augmented by length-aware normalization and variance stabilization to ensure stability. Extensive experiments on a newly constructed suite covering 7 subjective task categories across 50 low-resource languages demonstrate that this checklist-driven approach yields substantial improvements in reasoning capability and response quality, particularly in settings where traditional reward models exhibit significant degradation. We publicly release our models and the corresponding evaluation benchmark to facilitate further research. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shajiu/SGCM .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance in multilingual tasks, yet the process of constructing predictions in the target language remains under-explored. In this work, we introduce the FFN Lens, a novel interpretability method focusing on the Transformer’s core computational module, the Feed-Forward Network (FFN). By directly leveraging model parameters, the FFN Lens identifies both the critical units responsible for constructing specific information and the input features that drive them, which is essential for understanding Large Language Models. Applying FFN Lens to multilingual tasks, we demonstrate the prediction construction process and reveal the distinct division of labor across model layers. We identify a three-stage functional pipeline for constructing multilingual predictions: Latent Translation, Semantic Mapping, and Self Emphasis. We further introduce subspace analysis to validate this three-stage mechanism from a complementary perspective, and leverage these mechanistic insights to propose a training-free uncertainty estimation method.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized generative tasks, but concerns about their trustworthiness and vulnerability to adversarial attacks persist. This paper introduces the Generative Robustness Evaluation (GRE) Score, a novel metric designed to assess LLMs’ resilience against adversarial red teaming attempts that may compromise model compliance and elicit undesired responses. Our approach utilizes conditional generation for synthetic text creation, offering an attack-independent evaluation of LLM robustness. By calculating the margin in refusal scores, we quantify the robustness of LLMs in an attack-agnostic manner. We evaluate our method on five dimensions with specified datasets, encompassing ethical considerations, safety protocols, and potential misuse scenarios. We present four contributions: (1) The GRE Score framework, which establishes a textual robustness certificate for LLMs against adversarial red teaming attempts, providing a theoretical foundation for quantifying model resilience. (2) Comprehensive evaluations across five dimensions using eight prominent LLMs, validating GRE Scores with adversarial red teaming attacks. Our method demonstrates a consistent ranking of LLM robustness when compared to the attack-based model ranking on TrustLLM (CITATION) while achieving a significant 5-8x speedup compared to traditional evaluation techniques. (3) Insights into the non-linear relationship between model scaling and performance, revealing that larger models do not always perform better, and an analysis of how instruction-tuning impacts robustness across LLMs. (4) The discovery that all evaluated LLMs exhibit lower performance in robustness and privacy tasks compared to other areas, highlighting a critical gap in capabilities.

Abstract:
The evolution of video generation toward complex, multi-shot narratives has exposed a critical deficit in current evaluation methods. Existing benchmarks remain anchored to single-shot paradigms, lacking the comprehensive story assets and cross-shot metrics required to assess long-form coherence and appeal. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSVBench , the first comprehensive benchmark featuring hierarchical scripts and reference images tailored for M ulti- S hot V ideo generation. We propose a hybrid evaluation framework that synergizes the high-level semantic reasoning of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) with the fine-grained perceptual rigor of domain-specific expert models. Evaluating 20 video generation methods across diverse paradigms, we find that current models—despite strong visual fidelity—primarily behave as visual interpolators rather than true world models. We further validate the reliability of our benchmark by demonstrating a state-of-the-art Spearman’s rank correlation of 0.944 with human judgments. Finally, MSVBench extends beyond evaluation by providing a scalable supervisory signal. Fine-tuning a lightweight model on its pipeline-refined reasoning traces yields human-aligned performance comparable to commercial models like Gemini-2.5-Flash.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) provide a unified framework to process both text-only tasks and vision-language tasks. However, finetuning VLMs on vision-language data has degraded language capabilities. In this paper, we prove that as the training loss declines during finetuning, the visual representation and textual representation move closer to each other, a phenomenon we term “representation mixing.” We prove that the representation mixing occurring within the post-representation layers causes the degradation of language capabilities. Post-representation layers refer to the first few layers in LLMs that are involved in representation learning. To preserve the language capabilities, we propose the Representation Regulation for VLM Training (RRVLM), which introduces a Representation Distribution Difference (RDD) loss to reduce the distance between these representations. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks and VLM frameworks show that our method can effectively preserve the language capabilities and achieve superior vision-language performance.

Abstract:
As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) mature, GUI agents are evolving from static interactions to complex navigation. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training MLLM agents on dynamic GUI tasks, its effective application faces a dilemma.Standard Offline RL often relies on static step-level data, neglecting global trajectory semantics such as task completion and execution quality. Conversely, Online RL captures the long-term dynamics but suffers from high interaction costs and potential environmental instability. To bridge this gap, we propose SOLAR-RL (Semi Online Long-horizon RL). Instead of relying solely on expensive online interactions, our framework integrates global trajectory insights directly into the offline learning process. Specifically, we reconstruct diverse rollout candidates from static data, detect the first failure point using per-step validity signals, and retroactively assign dense step-level rewards with target-aligned shaping to reflect trajectory-level execution quality—effectively simulating online feedback without interaction costs.Extensive experiments demonstrate that SOLAR-RL significantly improves long-horizon task completion rates and robustness compared to strong baselines, offering a sample-efficient solution for autonomous GUI navigation.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from overthinking, a phenomenon in which redundant reasoning steps are generated after a correct solution has already been reached. Existing early reasoning exit methods primarily rely on output-level heuristics or trained probing models to skip redundant reasoning steps, thereby mitigating overthinking. However, these approaches typically require additional rollout computation or externally labeled datasets. In this paper, we propose NEAT, a Neuron-based Early reAsoning exiT framework that monitors neuron-level activation dynamics to enable training-free early exits, without introducing any additional test-time computation. NEAT identifies exit-associated neurons and tracks their activation patterns during reasoning to dynamically trigger early exit or suppress reflection, thereby reducing unnecessary reasoning while preserving solution quality. Experiments on four reasoning benchmarks across six models with different scales and architectures show that, for each model, NEAT achieves an average token reduction of 22% to 28% when averaged over the four benchmarks, while maintaining accuracy.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in document understanding tasks; however, VLMs also suffer from hallucinations inherited from LLMs. While prior work has focused on reasoning-stage hallucinations, the role of visual perception remains underexplored. In this work, we define perceptual hallucination as the phenomenon where VLMs generate information as if perceived, despite absent or damaged visual evidence. To analyze this, we construct DocHallu, a benchmark of 2,671 original–damaged image pairs across three tasks, available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/IB99/DocHallu. Experiments reveal that perceptual hallucination occurs across all models, with higher rates for numerical content than textual content. Activation patching analysis suggests that hallucinations are strongly associated with errors introduced in the vision encoder, which can subsequently propagate and become amplified through the text decoding process. We also demonstrate that LLM-based post-hoc filtering can reduce hallucination exposure by 36% on average, with reductions of up to 88%. This work extends VLM hallucination research by defining, analyzing, and verifying perceptual hallucination in document understanding.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable breakthroughs in reasoning, yet continue to struggle with hallucinations, logical errors, and inability to self-correct during complex multi-step tasks. Current approaches like chain-of-thought prompting offer limited reasoning capabilities that fail when precise step validation is required. We propose Environment Augmented Generation (EAG), a framework that enhances LLM reasoning through: (1) real-time environmental feedback validating each reasoning step, (2) dynamic branch exploration for investigating alternative solution paths when faced with errors, and (3) experience-based learning from successful reasoning trajectories. Unlike existing methods, EAG enables deliberate backtracking and strategic replanning through tight integration of execution feedback with branching exploration. Our a1-32B model achieves state-of-the-art performance among similar-sized models across all benchmarks, matching larger models like o1 on competition mathematics while outperforming comparable models by up to 24.4 percentage points. Analysis reveals EAG’s distinctive scaling pattern: initial token investment in environment interaction yields substantial long-term performance dividends, with advantages amplifying proportionally to task complexity.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on challenging visual question answering benchmarks, yet their inference efficiency is severely constrained by the rapidly growing context. This growth stems from two primary sources: the large number of visual tokens required to encode images, and the accumulation of intermediate reasoning traces during autoregressive generation. To address these challenges, we propose LaT (Look and Think), the first modality-decoupled compression method that enables efficient multimodal inference. LaT structures reasoning into alternating looking and thinking steps, thereby explicitly signaling when visual grounding is required. Building on this design, LaT (1) evicts visual tokens whenever visual grounding is unnecessary, and (2) applies co-learning-guided compression after each completed step, mitigating the two sources of context growth respectively. Experimental results demonstrate that LaT reduces the average context length by up to 57%, while maintaining performance comparable to the standard MLLM baseline. The code will be publicly released.

Abstract:
Peer review relies on substantive, evidence-based questions, yet current LLMs generate surface-level queries that perform worse than human reviewer questions in expert evaluation. To address this gap, we curate a high-quality dataset of reviewer questions from OpenReview and conduct a human preference study where expert annotators evaluate question-paper pairs across three dimensions: effort, evidence, and grounding. From these annotations, we train IntelliReward, a reward model built from a frozen autoregressive LLM with trainable multi-head transformers. Validated against expert judgments, IntelliReward predicts reviewer-question quality better than API-based SFT baselines and provides scalable evaluation. We apply Decoupled Clip and Dynamic Sampling Policy Optimization (DAPO) with IntelliReward to train IntelliAsk, a question-generation model aligned with human standards of effortful, evidence-based critique. Human evaluations show IntelliAsk generates more grounded, substantive and effortful questions than strong baselines and reduces reliance on first-page content. We also find improvements on reasoning and writing benchmarks, suggesting reviewer-question quality correlates with broader capabilities. Compared to Qwen3-32B, IntelliAsk improves MuSR (68.3 vs 64.7 Acc) and WritingBench (8.31 vs 8.07). We release our code, filtered review dataset, expert annotations, IntelliAsk and IntelliReward to support automatic evaluation of grounding, effort, and evidence in LLM-generated review questions.

Abstract:
News outlets shape public opinion on a scale, which makes automated detection of political bias and factuality essential. Yet, the field still lacks unified resources, comprehensive evaluations in diverse approaches, and systematic analyzes of the representations and fusion strategies that matter the most, especially under label sparsity and dataset diversity. In addition, there is little empirical work that reports broad observation driven findings about what consistently works, what fails, and why. We address these gaps with four contributions: (i) MBFC-2025, a large-scale label set that covers ~2,600 outlets from Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC); (ii) multi-view representations for ACL-2020 ~900 outlets and MBFC-2025, spanning Alexa graphs, hyperlink graphs, LLM-derived graphs, articles, and Wikipedia descriptions; (iii) systematic evaluation and analysis of embedding views and fusion strategies, including an RL-based fusion variant; and (iv) extensive experiments that achieve state-of-the-art results on ACL-2020 and establish strong benchmarks on MBFC-2025.

Abstract:
Text-to-image diffusion models achieve remarkable generation quality, yet their internal mechanisms for grounding prompt semantics into visual structure remain poorly understood. We present a novel mechanistic interpretability framework for Stable Diffusion that probes how individual prompt tokens are represented and utilized during the denoising process. Given a prompt, we record cross-attention activations throughout UNet denoising and convert them into token-level spatial grounding maps that indicate where each token contributes signal during image synthesis. To establish causal faithfulness, we perform controlled prompt interventions by removing a single word at a time while keeping the sampling seed fixed, producing counterfactual generations. To quantify mechanistic sensitivity, we introduce a head-resolved spike score based on divergence between per-head token contribution distributions before and after intervention, enabling module-wise and head-wise attribution of semantic changes. Experiments on compositional prompts and challenging relational descriptions reveal systematic patterns of token grounding, semantic drift, and head specialization across denoising timesteps. Our results provide a practical and reproducible toolkit for analyzing how diffusion models encode and apply semantic information, supporting deeper transparency in text-to-image generation.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a prominent paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, the entropy of LLMs usually collapses during RLVR training, leading to premature convergence to suboptimal local minima and hindering further performance improvement. Although various approaches have been proposed to mitigate entropy collapse, a comprehensive study of entropy in RLVR remains lacking. To bridge this gap, we conduct extensive experiments to investigate the entropy dynamics of LLMs trained with RLVR and analyze how model entropy correlates with response diversity, calibration, and performance across various benchmarks. Our results identify three key factors that influence entropy: the clipping thresholds in the optimization objective, the number of off-policy updates, and the diversity of the training data. Furthermore, through both theoretical analysis and empirical validation, we demonstrate that tokens with positive advantages are the primary drivers of entropy collapse. Motivated by this insight, we propose Positive-Advantage Reweighting, a simple yet effective approach that regulates model entropy by adjusting the loss weights assigned to tokens with positive advantages during RLVR training, while maintaining competitive performance.

Abstract:
Neural audio codecs are widely used as tokenizers for spoken language models, but they are optimized for waveform reconstruction rather than autoregressive prediction.This mismatch injects acoustically driven uncertainty into the discrete token space and increases language-model perplexity.We propose , which augments codec training with language-model-facing objectives while keeping both codec and LLM architectures unchanged.introduces (i) future token prediction with Medusa-style multi-step heads to encourage multi-step predictability, and (ii) semantic alignment that matches audio and text representations via a memory-bank contrastive loss.A differentiable Gumbel bridge enables end-to-end gradients from these objectives to the codec encoder.On SALMon speech coherence, token LMs trained on reach 61.6% accuracy (+12.1 points over AUV) while reducing perplexity 35 × .On Codec-SUPERB-tiny, improves speech Mel distance by 5.0% over AUV while simultaneously achieving the learnability gains, demonstrating that reconstruction fidelity and token predictability can be improved together.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is critical for reducing hallucinations and incorporating external knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs). However, advanced RAG systems face a trade-off between performance and efficiency. Multi-round RAG approaches achieve strong reasoning but incur excessive LLM calls and token costs, while Graph RAG methods suffer from computationally expensive, error-prone graph construction and retrieval redundancy. To address these challenges, we propose T 2 RAG, a novel framework that operates on a simple, graph-free knowledge base of atomic triplets. T 2 RAG leverages an LLM to decompose questions into searchable triplets with placeholders, which it then iteratively resolves by retrieving evidence from the triplet database. Empirical results show that T 2 RAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art multi-round and Graph RAG methods, achieving an average performance gain of up to 11% across six datasets while reducing retrieval costs by up to 45%.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer inference-time memory bottlenecks dominated by the attention Key-Value (KV) cache, which scales with model size and context length. While KV-cache quantization alleviates this cost, bit allocation between keys and values is often tuned heuristically, lacking theoretical grounding and generalizability. This paper proposes two theorems that anchor mixed-precision KV quantization in the intrinsic geometry of Transformer models. First, key weight matrices systematically have larger spectral and Frobenius norms than value matrices, implying higher information density along the key path. Second, for any given memory budget, prioritizing precision for keys over values strictly reduces quantization error and better preserves accuracy. Empirical evaluations across various prominent LLMs and benchmarks show that key-favored allocations (e.g., 4-bit keys, 2-bit values) retain up to 98.3% accuracy compared to uniform allocations (e.g., 4-bit for both), while conserving memory. These results transform bit allocation from ad hoc tuning into a theoretically grounded, geometry-driven design principle for efficient LLM inference. Source code is available at https://github.com/mohsenhariri/spectral-kv.

Abstract:
Model merging has emerged as a promising technique for combining multiple fine-tuned models into a single multitask model without retraining. However, the factors that determine whether merging will succeed or fail remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate why specific models are merged better than others. To do so, we propose a concrete, measurable definition of mergeability. We investigate several potential causes for high or low mergeability, highlighting the base model knowledge as a dominant factor: Models fine-tuned on instances that the base model knows better are more mergeable than models fine-tuned on instances that the base model struggles with. Based on our mergeability definition, we explore a simple weighted merging technique that better preserves weak knowledge in the base model.

Abstract:
Large language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities but often require significant computational resources due to verbose, unstructured Chain-of-Thought outputs. Recent approaches guide reasoning length through token penalties or truncation, risking the omission of necessary steps. We posit that conciseness should be an emergent property of structured thought, rather than a result of artificially forced brevity. To this end, we first demonstrate that Attribute-Guided Prompting, a lightweight zero-shot strategy, improves reasoning performance while reducing inference cost. Building on this foundation, we introduce Controlled Attribute-Driven Reasoning Optimization (CLARO), a reinforcement learning framework designed to internalize these benefits. CLARO guides models to embed high-quality structural attributes, such as readability, math density, syntactic compression, and low redundancy, within a user-defined token budget. The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across diverse benchmarks, yielding accuracy gains of up to 63.6%, demonstrating that guiding generated output language structure enhances reasoning. Overall, our findings establish that optimizing the thought process structure refines reasoning efficacy, with computational efficiency emerging as a derivative benefit of a clearer thought process. Code and models are available at https://github.com/odedsc/CLARO.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise for automated code repair but often struggle with the complex semantic and structural correctness required. We present SynthFix, a hybrid neural-symbolic framework that improves LLM-based vulnerability repair by unifying code synthesis with compiler-informed symbolic feedback. The core of our approach is an adaptive training strategy where a neural Router Model directs code samples to either Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) to learn common patterns or Reward Fine-Tuning (RFT) with symbolic rewards for complex, iterative refinement. On the FixJS (JavaScript) and CodeFlaws (C) benchmarks, SynthFix achieves up to 18% relative improvement in CodeBLEU/CrystalBLEU and 32% in Exact Match over strong SFT and RFT baselines. Our results show that this adaptive combination of training strategies, which mirrors how developers alternate between pattern application and tool feedback, significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based vulnerability repair. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/CoderDoge1108/SynthFix.

Abstract:
Large language models have been extensively studied for emotion recognition and moral reasoning as distinct capabilities, yet the extent to which emotions influence moral judgment remains underexplored. In this work, we develop an emotion-induction pipeline that infuses emotion into moral situations and evaluate shifts in moral acceptability across multiple datasets and LLMs.We observe a directional pattern: positive emotions increase moral acceptability and negative emotions decrease it, with effects strong enough to reverse binary moral judgments in up to 20% of cases, and with susceptibility scaling inversely with model capability.Our analysis further reveals that specific emotions can sometimes behave contrary to what their valence would predict (e.g., remorse paradoxically increases acceptability). A complementary human annotation study shows humans do not exhibit these systematic shifts, indicating an alignment gap in current LLMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are commonly adapted to downstream tasks using parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) or in-context learning (ICL). Recently, ICL-driven embedding-based adaptation has been proposed as a distinct task adaptation paradigm. It derives task-specific embeddings from intermediate activations using few-shot prompts and injects them during inference. Despite its conceptual appeal, this approach has not demonstrated consistent performance gains over PEFT or ICL, and its empirical advantages have been limited in practice. We propose Soft head-selection for ICL-derived Task Embeddings (SITE), a gradient-based method that identifies task-relevant attention heads to enable effective task embedding injection. Across various types of open-ended generation, reasoning, and natural language understanding tasks, SITE significantly outperforms prior embedding-based adaptation methods and few-shot ICL, while using substantially fewer trainable parameters than PEFT. Experiments on 12 LLMs ranging from 4B to 70B parameters demonstrate the generality of our approach, and intra-task and inter-task activation patching analyses further provide new mechanistic insights by revealing strong task dependence in attention head functionality.

Abstract:
Multilingual retrieval-augmented generation (mRAG) is often implemented within a fixed retrieval space, typically via query or document translation or multilingual embedding vector representations. However, this approach may be inadequate for culturally grounded queries, in which retrieval-condition misalignment may occur. Even strong retrievers and generators may struggle to produce culturally relevant answers when sourcing evidence from inappropriate linguistic or regional contexts. To this end, we introduce CORAL (COntext-aware Retrieval with Agentic Loop, an adaptive retrieval methodology for mRAG that enables iterative refinement of both the retrieval space (corpora) and the retrieval probe (query) based on the quality of the evidence. The overall process includes: (1) selecting corpora, (2) retrieving documents, (3) critiquing evidence for relevance and cultural alignment, and (4) checking sufficiency. If the retrieved documents are insufficient to answer the query correctly, the system (5) reselects corpora and rewrites the query. Across two cultural QA benchmarks, CORAL achieves up to a 3.58%p accuracy improvement on low-resource languages relative to the strongest baselines.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) used in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can amplify demographic bias: retrievers may surface skewed context and generators can propagate that skew into decisions. Prior work typically treats fairness in retrieval or generation in isolation, leaving end-to-end fairness in RAG underexplored. We propose a post-hoc pipeline that jointly controls both stages: (i) a Fair Greedy Reranker (FGR) that builds prefix-balanced slates toward a target group mix; (ii) a Residual Slate Bias Estimator (RSBE) using signed, prefix-sensitive NDKL to quantify remaining skew; and (iii) Confidence-Gated Logit Calibration (CGLC) that converts the residual signal into small and margin-focused logit corrections without retraining. On an occupation classification task, our approach reduces retriever-side skew (lowest NDKL among baselines for both dense and sparse retrievers) and achieves the lowest generator-side disparity (e.g., Risk Difference) while largely preserving utility. The same calibration can be tuned to alternative fairness criteria (e.g., Equal Opportunity) with minimal utility loss.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit social biases, which can lead to harmful stereotypes and unfair outcomes. We propose Multi-Persona Thinking (MPT), a simple inference-time framework that reduces social bias by encouraging reasoning from multiple perspectives. MPT guides the model to consider contrasting social identities, such as male and female, together with a neutral viewpoint. These viewpoints then interact through an iterative reasoning process to identify and correct biased judgments. This design transforms the potential weakness of persona assignment into a mechanism to mitigate bias. We evaluate MPT on two widely used bias benchmarks with both open-source and closed-source models. Our results show that MPT achieves a lower bias than the existing prompting-based methods while maintaining the core reasoning ability.

Abstract:
Synthetic clinical data are essential for advancing AI in healthcare, given strict privacy constraints on electronic health records (EHRs), the scarcity of annotated data for rare or slowly progressing conditions, and demographic biases in observational cohorts. Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent clinical text, but ensuring that such outputs are both clinically grounded and useful for downstream modeling remains challenging. We present DualAlign, a disease-agnostic framework for generating privacy-preserving, clinically faithful synthetic EHR narratives. DualAlign improves generation fidelity through two complementary alignment mechanisms: persona alignment, which conditions generation on patient demographics and risk factors, and symptom-trajectory alignment, which grounds narratives in empirically observed longitudinal symptom patterns. Using Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as a case study, DualAlign produces context-aware, symptom-rich sentences that more closely reflect real-world clinical documentation. Augmenting limited gold-standard data with DualAlign substantially improves AD symptom classification, outperforming both gold-only training and unconstrained synthetic baselines. Overall, DualAlign provides a generalizable approach for generating high-utility synthetic clinical text in chronic and progressive diseases, reducing annotation burden while enabling scalable and privacy-conscious clinical NLP research.

Abstract:
Current large language models (LLMs), even those explicitly trained for reasoning, often struggle with ambiguous content moderation cases due to misleading "decision shortcuts" embedded in context. Inspired by cognitive psychology insights into expert moderation, we introduce CᴀʀO (Chain-of-Analogy Reasoning Optimization), a novel two-stage training framework to induce robust analogical reasoning in LLMs. First, CᴀʀO bootstraps analogical reasoning chains via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on moderation data and performs supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Second, we propose a customized direct preference optimization (DPO) approach to reinforce analogical reasoning behaviors explicitly. Unlike static retrieval methods, CᴀʀO dynamically generates tailored analogical references during inference, effectively mitigating harmful decision shortcuts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CᴀʀO substantially outperforms state-of-the-art reasoning models (DeepSeek R1, QwQ), specialized moderation models (LLaMA Guard), and advanced fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented methods, achieving an average F1 score improvement of 24.9% on challenging ambiguous moderation benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large language models often display undesirable behaviors embedded in their internal representations, undermining fairness, inconsistency drift, amplification of harmful content, and the propagation of unwanted patterns during extended dialogue and conversations. Although training-time or data-centric methods attempt to reduce these effects, they are computationally expensive, irreversible once deployed, and slow to adapt to new conversational contexts. Pruning-based methods provide a flexible and transparent way to reduce bias by adjusting the neurons responsible for certain behaviors. However, most existing approaches are static; once a neuron is removed, the model loses the ability to adapt when the conversation or context changes. To address this, we propose a dynamic, reversible, pruning-based framework that detects context-aware neuron activations and applies adaptive masking to modulate their influence during generation. Our inference-time solution provides fine-grained, memory-aware mitigation with knowledge-preserved, more coherent behavior across multilingual single- and multi-turn dialogues, enabling dynamic fairness control in real-world conversational AI.

Abstract:
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) achieve state-of-the-art performance in high-stakes domains like healthcare, yet their reasoning remains opaque. Attention- and saliency-based methods often fail to faithfully represent the model’s decision process, particularly when integrating heterogeneous modalities. We introduce Tree-of-Evidence (ToE), an inference-time search algorithm that frames interpretability as a discrete optimization problem. Rather than relying on soft attention weights, ToE employs lightweight Evidence Bottlenecks that score coarse units of data (e.g., vital-sign windows, report chunks) and performs a beam search to identify the compact evidence set required to reproduce the model’s prediction. We evaluate ToE across six tasks spanning three datasets and two domains, including clinical prediction on MIMIC-IV, cross-center validation on eICU, and non-clinical fault detection on LEMMA-RCA. ToE retains over 98% of full-model AUROC with as few as five evidence units, achieves higher decision agreement and lower fidelity error than LIME, SHAP, saliency, and concept-bottleneck baselines under sparse budgets, and outperforms LLMs up to 70B parameters. ToE therefore provides a practical mechanism for auditing multimodal models.

Abstract:
Hallucination detection is crucial for large language models (LLMs), as hallucinated content creates significant barriers in applications requiring factual accuracy. Current detection methods mainly depend on internal signals like uncertainty and self-consistency checks, using the model’s pre-trained knowledge to identify unreliable outputs. However, pre-trained knowledge may become outdated and has coverage limitations, especially for specialized or recent information. To address these limitations, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has emerged as a promising solution by retrieving relevant evidence at inference time, grounding outputs beyond the model’s parametric knowledge. In this paper, we target a critical and practical learning problem RAG-based hallucination detection (RHD), where RAG is employed to enhance hallucination detection by addressing information updating challenges. To address RHD, we propose a novel method Evidence-Aligned Entity Verification (EAEV), which detects entity-level hallucinations by leveraging RAG to align generated entities with retrieved evidence contexts. Specifically, EAEV evaluates entity-evidence alignment through three complementary dimensions and introduces counterfactual stability analysis to ensure robust alignments under evidence perturbations. Experiments across multiple RAG benchmarks demonstrate that EAEV achieves consistent improvements over existing methods with strong generalization capabilities.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems often fail to maintain contextual faithfulness, generating responses that conflict with the provided context. Existing methods attempt to improve faithfulness through external interventions, such as specialized prompting, decoding-based calibration, or preference optimization. However, since these approaches treat the LLM as a black box, they lack a reliable mechanism to assess how these conflicts occur. Consequently, they tend to be brittle, data-intensive, and agnostic to the model’s internal reasoning process. In this paper, we move beyond black-box interventions to analyze the model’s internal reasoning process. We discover that conflicting and aligned knowledge states are linearly separable in the model’s latent space, and contextual noise systematically increases the entropy of these representations. Based on these findings, we propose ProbeRAG, a novel framework for faithful RAG that operates in three stages: (i) fine-grained knowledge pruning to filter irrelevant context, (ii) latent conflict probing to identify hard conflicts in the model’s latent space, and (iii) conflict-aware attention to modulate attention heads toward faithful context integration. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ProbeRAG substantially improves both accuracy and contextual faithfulness. The related resources are available at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/ProbeRAG.

Abstract:
User behavior in the real world is diverse, cross-domain, and spans long time horizons. Existing user modeling benchmarks however remain narrow, focusing mainly on short sessions and next-item prediction within a single domain. Such limitations hinder progress toward robust and generalizable user models. We present HORIZON, a new benchmark that reformulates user modeling along three axes i.e. dataset, task, and evaluation. Built from a large-scale, cross-domain reformulation of Amazon Reviews, HORIZON covers 54M users and 35M items, enabling both pretraining and realistic evaluation of models in heterogeneous environments. Unlike prior benchmarks, it challenges models to generalize across domains, users, and time, moving beyond standard missing-positive prediction in the same domain. We propose new tasks and evaluation setups that better reflect real-world deployment scenarios. These include temporal generalization, sequence-length variation, and modeling unseen users, with metrics designed to assess general user behavior understanding rather than isolated next-item prediction. We benchmark popular sequential recommendation architectures alongside LLM-based baselines that leverage long-term interaction histories. Our results highlight the gap between current methods and the demands of real-world user modeling, while establishing HORIZON as a foundation for research on temporally robust, cross-domain, and general-purpose user models.

Abstract:
While excelling at solving complex problems, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are still constrained by the overthinking issue. Most current studies rely on reward shaping in Reinforcement Learning (RL) to shorten the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) of LRMs, remaining sample-inefficient and non-robust due to the absence of guided exploration and prioritized exploitation. To address these issues, we propose a novel policy optimization framework with Self-Imitation and self-Guidance MechAnisms (SIGMA), which reshapes the exploration and exploitation through two core components: (i) self-imitation exploitation, which enables the prioritized exploitation of high-value prompts and rollouts by introducing a self-imitated loss and a dynamic sampling strategy based on compression rate; (ii) self-guidance exploration, which provides a preference-aware exploration guidance through diverse and pluggable self-rewriting strategies. Experiments across various datasets indicate that our method achieves superior reasoning efficiency without compromising, and even facilitating, the overall accuracy. Furthermore, ablation studies show that the proposed mechanisms can provide flexible control interfaces for the tradeoff between the reasoning accuracy and efficiency of LRMs.

Abstract:
Large Language Models often struggle with complex, multi-step operational tasks because they remain static during inference and cannot learn from past experience. To address this, we propose MUSE, a framework that enables iterative self-improvement through a hierarchical Memory Module. MUSE organizes cross-domain insights to facilitate the orchestration of long-horizon workflows. The core of our approach is an autonomous post-execution critique mechanism: after completing each sub-task, the system analyzes its operational logs and distills raw execution data into structured, reusable knowledge. This allows the agent to evolve dynamically rather than relying on fixed parameters. Evaluated on the rigorous TAC productivity benchmark, MUSE achieves new state-of-the-art results, significantly outperforming previous methods using only the streamlined Gemini-2.5 Flash model. Our analysis demonstrates that MUSE’s performance scales with the accumulation of insights and exhibits strong cross-task transferability, marking a key step toward autonomous systems capable of lifelong learning in professional environments. Demo videos can be found in our supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Producing presentation slides automatically entails coordinating narrative structure with page-level graphic design under strict spatial constraints. For such structured multimodal tasks, a well-organized design process is essential to ensure the final quality of slides. Existing approaches rely on fixed templates or directly emit executable code, thereby both limiting the creative layout-design capabilities of LLMs and bypassing the essential slide-page design step. To address these limitations, this paper: (1) proposes a hierarchical slides generation workflow DeepSlides that systematically organizes slide design tasks without any predefined template or style, decoupling slide-page design from implementation; (2) introduces SlideDesign , a dataset tailored specifically for slides generation tasks; (3) presents a multi-agent reinforcement learning training paradigm and trains a couple of models SlideQwens for slide design and implementation. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms baseline methods on evaluated metrics and achieves superior performance in human preference evaluations. The dataset and code are available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DeepSlides-D14D

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are powerful at integrating diverse data but often struggle with complex reasoning. Reinforcement learning (RL) can enhance reasoning, yet it may cause performance degradation on general tasks and overthinking in MLLMs. We propose Asymmetric Policy Optimization (APO), which separates responses into positive and negative groups. For positive samples, Difficulty-Adaptive Divergence Shaping (DADS) dynamically adjusts the KL weight to stabilize training and preserve knowledge. For negative samples, Suboptimal Trajectory Complexity Regularization (STCR) penalizes overly long responses to reduce overthinking. Applied to Qwen2.5-VL, our model View-R1 achieves a 10.55% improvement in reasoning and outperforms larger models (7–11B) while not only maintaining but also slightly improving performance on general tasks. These results highlight the effectiveness and broad applicability of our DADS and STCR techniques for advancing complex multimodal reasoning in MLLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/Collab-Gen/View-R1.

Abstract:
The core challenge of Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CZSL) lies in learning representations of sub-concepts (attributes and objects) from seen compositions and recognizing unseen novel compositions. Most existing CZSL methods primarily focus on prompt optimization on the textual side, while overlooking insufficient visual attribute–object sub-concepts disentanglement under a text-centric paradigm. To this end, we propose DMSD , a D ual- M odal S emantic D isentanglement framework that jointly models visual and textual information to achieve effective sub-concept disentanglement. Specifically, DMSD introduces a Contextual Prompt Space , enabling both visual and textual modalities to be modeled under unified contextual semantic representations, thereby enhancing their alignment at the latent semantic level. Moreover, we design Visual Sub - concept Prototypes that explicitly extract and model visual sub-concept features, improving the independence and discriminability of visual sub-concept representations. Furthermore, to achieve fine-grained alignment between visual and textual sub-concepts, we propose a Class - Centroid Bridging Module that guides class centroids toward the textual semantic space, thereby ensuring cross-modal semantic consistency. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets (MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA) demonstrate that DMSD achieves state-of-the-art performance in both closed-world and open-world settings. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DMSD-9CC4.

Abstract:
Language Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance by scaling test-time computation but often suffer from "overthinking", producing excessively long reasoning traces that increase latency and memory usage. Existing LRMs typically enforce conciseness with uniform length penalties, which over-compress crucial early deduction steps at the sequence level and indiscriminately penalize all queries at the group level. To solve these limitations, we propose PACE, a dual-level framework for prefix-protected and difficulty-aware compression under hierarchical supervision. At the sequence level, prefix-protected optimization employs decaying mixed rollouts to maintain valid reasoning paths while promoting conciseness. At the group level, difficulty-aware penalty dynamically scales length constraints based on query complexity, maintaining exploration for harder questions while curbing redundancy on easier ones. Extensive experiments on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen (1.5B/7B) demonstrate that PACE achieves a substantial reduction in token usage (up to 55.7%) while simultaneously improving accuracy (up to 4.1%) on math benchmarks, with generalization ability to code, science, and general domains.

Abstract:
As the parameter size of language models continues to grow, effective model compression is required to reduce their computational and memory overhead. Existing compression methods suffer from bottleneck issues: when the compression ratio is increased, performance degrades significantly. Low-rank decomposition and quantization are two prominent compression methods that have been proven to significantly reduce the computational and memory requirements of Large Language Models (LLMs) while maintaining model accuracy. Evidently, combining these two methods will break through the existing compression bottleneck. However, how these two methods interact when combined remains a critical question for developers, as many assume they are orthogonal, meaning their combination would not introduce additional errors beyond those independently introduced by each method. This paper provides the first mathematical proof that low-rank decomposition and quantization are non-orthogonal. We validate these findings through a series of experiments on large language models. Our results demonstrate that these methods are non-orthogonal, and their combination leads to significant performance degradation. Importantly, we propose a novel approach Diagonal Adhesive Method (DAM), which can effectively combine the two methods and mitigate the performance loss. Our research provides deep insights into model compression and lays a solid theoretical and experimental foundation for future related studies.

Abstract:
Prior work has shown that instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) are less well calibrated than their base pre-trained counterparts. However, little is known about the frequently used chat template’s effect on the calibration of conversational LLMs. In this work, we investigate the mechanisms driving this miscalibration by decoupling the effects of the post-training algorithm and the chat format. We find that, while instruction tuning fundamentally harms calibration, the chat template aggravates the issue through an “ownership bias” – models are significantly more confident in their own answers than in identical answers provided by a user. Extensive experiments across six recent open-weight LLMs, three benchmarks, and three confidence elicitation methods show that models assign up to 26% higher confidence to their own responses. Leveraging this insight, we propose a simple inference-time strategy: framing the model’s answer as user input during confidence elicitation. This approach significantly reduces overconfidence and improves calibration by up to 26% without the need for retraining, narrowing the gap between base and instruction-tuned models.

Abstract:
Prompt tuning has achieved remarkable progress in vision–language models (VLMs) and is recently being adopted for audio–language models (ALMs). However, its generalization ability in ALMs remains largely underexplored. We observe that conventional prompt tuning for ALMs also suffers from the Base–New Tradeoff, and we identify that this issue stems from the disrupted semantic structure of the embedding space. To address this issue, we propose Semantically Expanded Prompt Tuning (SEPT)—a plug-and-play framework that explicitly regularizes the prompt embedding space by incorporating semantic neighbors generated by large language models. SEPT introduces a novel semantic expansion loss with margin constraints that promote intra-class compactness and inter-class separability, thereby enhancing the semantic structure of the prompt embedding space. For comprehensive evaluation, we establish the first benchmark setup for prompt generalization in ALMs, covering both base-to-new generalization and cross-dataset transferability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SEPT consistently improves generalization performance across multiple prompt tuning baselines, while maintaining computational cost during inference.

Abstract:
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods, especially LoRA, are widely used for adapting pre-trained models to downstream tasks due to their computational and storage efficiency. However, in the context of LoRA and its variants, the potential of activation subspaces corresponding to tail eigenvectors remains substantially under-exploited, which may lead to suboptimal fine-tuning performance. In this work, we propose Astra (Activation-Space Tail-Eigenvector Low-Rank Adaptation), a novel PEFT method that leverages the tail eigenvectors of the model output activations—estimated from a small task-specific calibration set—to construct task-adaptive low-rank adapters. By constraining updates to the subspace spanned by these tail eigenvectors, Astra achieves faster convergence and improved downstream performance with a significantly reduced parameter budget. Extensive experiments across natural language understanding (NLU) and natural language generation (NLG) tasks demonstrate that Astra consistently outperforms existing PEFT baselines across 16 benchmarks and even surpasses full fine-tuning (FFT) in certain scenarios.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) offers a principled way to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models, yet its effectiveness hinges on training signals that remain informative as models evolve. In practice, RL progress often slows when task difficulty becomes poorly aligned with model capability or when training is dominated by a narrow set of recurring problem patterns.To jointly address these issues, we propose SCALER ( S ynthetic s C alable A daptive L earning E nvironment for R easoning), a framework that sustains effective learning signals through adaptive environment design.SCALER introduces a scalable synthesis pipeline that converts real-world programming problems into verifiable reasoning environments with controllable difficulty and unbounded instance generation, enabling RL training beyond finite datasets while preserving strong correctness guarantees. Building on this, SCALER further employs an adaptive multi-environment RL strategy that dynamically adjusts instance difficulty and curates the active set of environments to track the model’s capability frontier and maintain distributional diversity. This co-adaptation prevents reward sparsity, mitigates overfitting to narrow task patterns, and supports sustained improvement throughout training. Extensive experiments show that SCALER consistently outperforms other RL baselines across diverse reasoning benchmarks and exhibits more stable, long-horizon training dynamics.

Abstract:
Current multimodal fake news detectors predominantly function as opaque classifiers, offering limited deductive transparency and little insight into how conflicting evidence is reconciled. To address this limitation, we propose Dialectical Structured Reasoning (DSR), a framework modeling fake news detection as an explicit dialectical process over multimodal social context. DSR instantiates two opposing agents: a Verifier, which constructs evidence paths supporting semantic consistency, and a Debunker, which actively explores exposing logical or factual contradictions. Then a differentiable Judge agent adjudicates between these competing perspectives by integrating local evidence with global parametric knowledge. Experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that DSR achieves state-of-the-art performance while producing transparent, dialectically grounded explanations that closely mirror human reasoning process.

Abstract:
While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently emerged as a promising post-training paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs), its dependency on the gold label or domain-specific verifiers limits its scalability to new tasks and domains. In this work, we propose Verifier-free Intrinsic Gradient-Norm Reward (VIGOR), a simple reward that uses only the policy model itself. Given a prompt, VIGOR samples a group of completions and assigns higher within-group rewards to outputs that induce smaller ℓ 2 norms of the teacher-forced negative log-likelihood gradients under the current parameters. Intuitively, lower gradient norms suggest the completion aligns better with the current policy, serving as an intrinsic preference signal for policy optimization. To make this intrinsic signal practical for RL, we correct the systematic length bias of averaged token-level gradients with a √T scaling, and apply group-wise rank shaping to stabilize reward scales across prompts. Across mathematical reasoning benchmarks, VIGOR outperforms the state-of-the-art Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF) baseline INTUITOR, and it also exhibits cross-domain transfer to code benchmarks when trained only on math data. For instance, on Qwen2.5-7B-Base post-trained on MATH, VIGOR improves the average math accuracy by +3.31% and the average code accuracy by +1.91% over INTUITOR, while exhibiting more stable training dynamics.

Abstract:
Embodied question answering (EQA) in 3D environments often requires collecting context that is distributed across multiple viewpoints and partially occluded. However, most recent vision–language models (VLMs) are constrained to a fixed and finite set of input views, which limits their ability to acquire question-relevant context at inference time and hinders complex spatial reasoning. We propose Chain-of-View (CoV) prompting, a training-free, test-time reasoning framework that transforms a VLM into an active viewpoint reasoner through a coarse-to-fine exploration process. CoV first employs a View Selection agent to filter redundant frames and identify question-aligned anchor views. It then performs fine-grained view adjustment by interleaving iterative reasoning with discrete camera actions, obtaining new observations from the underlying 3D scene representation until sufficient context is gathered or a step budget is reached. We evaluate CoV on OpenEQA across four mainstream VLMs and obtain an average 11.98% improvement in LLM-Match, with a maximum gain of 13.62% on Qwen3-VL-Flash. CoV further exhibits test-time scaling: increasing the minimum action budget yields an additional 2.54% average improvement, peaking at 3.73% on Gemini-2.5-Flash. On ScanQA and SQA3D, CoV delivers strong performance (e.g., 116 CIDEr 31.9 EM@1 on ScanQA and 51.1 EM@1 on SQA3D). Overall, these results suggest that question-aligned view selection coupled with open-view search is an effective, model-agnostic strategy for improving spatial reasoning in 3D EQA without additional training.

Abstract:
Data marketplaces analyze strategic data exchanges among users, platforms, and buyers. However, most existing studies model static equilibria and complete information, which limits their realism. In this work, we study whether large language model (LLM)-driven agents can make equilibrium-consistent decisions in analytically tractable data marketplaces with evolving and incomplete-information. Specifically, we introduce EvoDM, an agent-based modeling framework that extends the static data marketplace to dynamic and incomplete-information settings while providing tractable equilibrium benchmarks for evaluating agent decisions. Building upon EvoDM, we propose Datamart-Agent, an LLM-driven game-theoretic agent that improves equilibrium-consistent decision execution through dynamic game tree memory and mechanism-guided reflection, without requiring parameter updates. Experiments demonstrate that Datamart-Agent closely matches equilibrium-consistent decision-making, achieving the lowest utility gap and over 20% higher Pass@ 𝜖 than strong baselines. After validating its effectiveness, we employ EvoDM with Datamart-Agent to analyze competition and regulation in assumption-relaxed settings where closed-form ground truth is unavailable, providing exploratory simulation-based insights into market dynamics and regulatory effects.

Abstract:
Deduction, induction, and abduction are fundamental reasoning paradigms, core for human logical thinking. Although improving Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning has attracted significant research efforts, the extent to which the fundamental paradigms induce generalization has yet to be systematically explored. In this study, we shed light on how the interplay between these core paradigms influences LLMs’ reasoning behavior. To this end, we first collect a new dataset of reasoning trajectories from symbolic tasks, each targeting one of the three fundamental paradigms, to abstract from concrete world knowledge. Then, we investigate effective ways for inducing these skills into LLMs.We experiment with a battery of methods including simple fine-tuning, and more complex approaches to increase model depth, or transform a dense model to a mixture-of-experts. We comprehensively evaluate induced models on realistic out-of-domain tasks, that are entirely formulated in natural language and contain real-world knowledge. Our results reveal that our approach yields strong generalizability with substantial performance gains (up to 14.60) across realistic tasks.

Abstract:
This paper focuses on the task of answering complex visual questions that involve cross-dimensional (like 2D to 3D) spatial reasoning. This task (called SpatialQA) can enhance the machine’s spatial cognitive abilities in "plane representation - space reconstruction - semantic inference," having great application value. Existing methods often only recognize 1-D visual objects and relations, but they lack the ability to represent in a cross-dimensional space and fail to grasp structured geometric knowledge such as face-face topology and texture details. That would cause problems such as texture misalignment and topological confusion, leading to error accumulation and incorrect answers. To address this problem, we propose a new method with good cross-dimensional reasoning capabilities. In detail, we first analyze the input image, capturing its relations in the 2D plane. To derive the topological relations in the 3D space, we employ a dual-channel augmentation technique to retrieve topological isomorphic examples and geometric rules, supplementing the missing but crucial reasoning clues. We then design a multi-perspective verifier to find the inconsistencies of the macroscopic outlines, eliminating incorrect options. Based on visual clues, we develop a question-guided detector to analyze the texture details and relations of each surface finely, capturing inconsistencies in a micro level. That can correct the reasoning bias to derive the right answer. Moreover, we create a large-scale dataset with 22,483 samples to conduct evaluations. The results show the effectiveness of our method.

Abstract:
Multi-agent debate (MAD) is widely used to improve large language model (LLM) performance through test-time scaling, yet recent work shows that vanilla MAD often underperforms simple majority vote despite higher computational cost. Studies show that, under homogeneous agents and uniform belief updates, debate preserves expected correctness and therefore cannot reliably improve outcomes. Drawing on findings from human deliberation and collective decision-making, we identify two key mechanisms missing from vanilla MAD: (i) diversity of initial viewpoints and (ii) explicit, calibrated confidence communication. We propose two lightweight interventions. First, a diversity-aware initialisation that selects a more diverse pool of candidate answers, increasing the likelihood that a correct hypothesis is present at the start of debate. Second, a confidence-modulated debate protocol in which agents express calibrated confidence and condition their updates on others’ confidence. We show theoretically that diversity-aware initialisation improves the prior probability of MAD success without changing the underlying update dynamics, while confidence-modulated updates enable debate to systematically drift to the correct hypothesis. Empirically, across six reasoning-oriented QA benchmarks, our methods consistently outperform vanilla MAD and majority vote. Our results connect human deliberation with LLM-based debate and demonstrate that simple, principled modifications can substantially enhance debate effectiveness.

Abstract:
Scientific rigour tends to be sidelined in favour of bold statements, leading authors to overstate claims beyond what their results support. We present RIGOURATE, a two-stage multimodal framework that retrieves supporting evidence from a paper’s body and assigns each claim an overstatement score. The framework consists of a dataset of over 10K claim–evidence sets from ICLR and NeurIPS papers, annotated using eight LLMs, with overstatement scores calibrated using peer-review comments and validated through human evaluation. It employes a fine-tuned reranker for evidence retrieval and a fine-tuned model to predict overstatement scores with justification. Compared to strong baselines, RIGOURATE enables improved evidence retrieval and overstatement detection. Overall, our work operationalises evidential proportionality and supports clearer, more transparent scientific communication.

Abstract:
Generating coherent, semantically accurate text from large structured inputs remains a persistent challenge in data-to-text generation, as single-step LLM mappings from data-to-text limit control over discourse structuring and amplify hallucinations and omissions as input size grows. We introduce a new dataset of extended DBpedia triple sets (up to 199 triples per input), and a modular multi-agent framework: specialised LLM agents handle content ordering, text structuring, and surface realisation under the supervision of an orchestrator and guardrail control loop. The system generates multi-paragraph outputs in English and Irish (low-resource). We compare a three-worker multi-agent configuration against a single-worker multi-task variant and a strong end-to-end baseline. Quality is assessed via human evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge (with truncation-based sanity checks). Results show slightly superior coherence for the multi-agent approach in both languages, with statistically significant inter-rater correlation over all criteria for English and no statistically significant correlation for Irish. Human-LLM alignment is very weak overall, thus exposing key limits in scalable NLG evaluation.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents can increasingly automate complex reasoning through Test-Time Scaling (TTS), an iterative refinement process guided by reward signals.However, many real-world tasks involve multi-stage pipelines whose final outcomes lack verifiable rewards or sufficient data to train robust reward models, making judge-based refinement prone to error accumulation across stages.We propose Selective TTS , a process-based refinement framework that scales inference across stages of a multi-agent pipeline, instead of repeatedly refining a single output over time as in prior work.By distributing compute across stages and pruning low-quality branches early using process-specific judgers, Selective TTS mitigates the judge drift and stabilizes refinement.Grounded in a data science workflow, we build an end-to-end multi-agent pipeline for generating visually insightful reports from a given dataset, and design a reliable LLM-based judge model that aligns with human experts (Kendall’s 𝜏 =0.55) to evaluate them.Our proposed selective TTS then improves insight quality under a fixed compute budget, increasing mean scores from 61.64 (baseline) to 65.86 while reducing variance.We hope our findings serve as the first step toward scaling complex, open-ended tasks with unverifiable rewards like scientific discovery. Our code and generated reports are publicly available at https://minnesotanlp.github.io/insight-scaling-webpage.

Abstract:
Automatic evaluators such as reward models play a central role in the alignment and evaluation of large vision–language models (LVLMs). Despite their growing importance, these evaluators are almost exclusively assessed on English-centric benchmarks, leaving open the question of how well these evaluators generalize across languages. To answer this question, we introduce MM-JudgeBench, the first large-scale benchmark for multilingual and multimodal judge model evaluation, which includes over 60K pairwise preference instances spanning 25 typologically diverse languages. MM-JudgeBench integrates two complementary subsets: a general vision–language preference evaluation subset extending VL-RewardBench, and a chart-centric visual–text reasoning subset derived from OpenCQA, enabling systematic analysis of reward models (i.e., LVLM judges) across diverse settings. We additionally release a multilingual training set derived from MM-RewardBench, disjoint from our evaluation data, to support domain adaptation. By evaluating 22 LVLMs (15 open-source, 7 proprietary), we uncover substantial cross-lingual performance variance in our proposed benchmark. Our analysis further shows that model size and architecture are poor predictors of multilingual robustness, and that even state-of-the-art LVLM judges exhibit inconsistent behavior across languages. Together, these findings expose fundamental limitations of current reward modeling and underscore the necessity of multilingual, multimodal benchmarks for developing reliable automated evaluators.

Abstract:
Language model users often embed personal and social context in their questions. Theasker’s role—implicit in how the question is framed—creates specific needs for an appropriate response. However, most evaluations, while capturing the model’s capability to respond, often ignore who is asking. This gap is especially critical in stigmatized domains such as opioid use disorder (OUD), where accounting for users’ contexts is essential to provide accessible, stigma-free responses. We propose CORUS (COmmunity-driven Roles for User-centric Question Simulation), a framework for simulating role-based questions. Drawing on role theory and posts from an online OUD recovery community (r/OpiatesRecovery), we first build a taxonomy of asker roles—patients, caregivers, practitioners. Next, we use it to simulate 15,321 questions that embed each role’s goals, behaviors, and experiences. Our evaluations show that these questions are both highly believable and comparable to real-world data. When used to evaluate five LLMs, for the same question but differing roles, we find systematic differences: vulnerable roles, such as patients and caregivers, elicit more supportive responses (+17%) and reduced knowledge content (−19%) in comparison to practitioners. Our work demonstrates how implicitly signaling a user’s role shapes model responses, and provides a methodology for role-informed evaluation of conversational AI.

Abstract:
Recently, watermarking has attracted growing attention as a practical technique for source attribution of machine-generated text. However, most prior work studies watermarking under benign prompts, while its behavior under jailbreaking prompts remains underexplored. This gap matters because jailbreaking can bypass safety policies and shift the generation regime, raising concerns that watermarking may interact with model alignment under attack. To address this gap, we evaluate six watermarking methods on four LLMs across two jailbreak benchmarks and three settings: Static, AutoDAN, and DSN. We find that watermarking can inflate judge-based attack success rate, denoted ASR, under jailbreaking, with the largest effects appearing in biased schemes that perturb logits. At the same time, these ASR increases often do not reflect higher harmful-goal compliance when measured by StrongREJECT or by human judgments. This suggests that ASR-only evaluations can be brittle to decoding perturbations and may overestimate harmful-goal compliance, motivating complementary goal-compliance metrics (e.g., StrongREJECT) and human evaluations.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated progress toward artificial general intelligence, yet their potential to generate harmful content poses critical safety challenges. Existing alignment methods often struggle to cover diverse safety scenarios and remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. In this work, we propose SAFER, a framework for Safety Alignment via eFficient Ex-Ante Reasoning. Our approach instantiates structured Ex-Ante reasoning through initial assessment, rule verification, and path calibration, and embeds predefined safety rules to provide transparent and verifiable safety judgments. Specifically, our approach consists of two training stages: (1) supervised fine-tuning with synthetic traces to teach the multi-stage Ex-Ante reasoning, and (2) step-level reasoning preference optimization to jointly enhance safety, utility, and efficiency. Experiments on multiple open-source LLMs demonstrate that SAFER significantly enhances safety performance while maintaining helpfulness and response efficiency.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have sparked growing interest in building fully autonomous agents. However, fully autonomous LLM-based agents still face significant challenges, including limited reliability due to hallucinations, difficulty in handling complex tasks, and substantial safety and ethical risks, all of which limit their feasibility and trustworthiness in real-world applications. To overcome these limitations, LLM-based human-agent systems (LLM-HAS) incorporate human-provided information, feedback, or control into the agent system to enhance system performance, reliability, and safety. These human-agent collaboration systems enable humans and LLM-based agents to collaborate effectively by leveraging their complementary strengths.This paper provides the first comprehensive and structured survey of LLM-HAS. It clarifies fundamental concepts, systematically presents core components shaping these systems, including environment and profiling, human feedback, interaction types, orchestration, and communication, explores emerging applications, and discusses unique challenges and opportunities arising from human-AI collaboration. By consolidating current knowledge and offering a structured overview, we aim to foster further research and innovation in this rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. Paper lists and resources are available at https://github.com/HenryPengZou/Awesome-Human-Agent-Collaboration-Interaction-Systems.

Abstract:
RL-based agentic search enables LLMs to solve complex questions via dynamic planning and external search. While this approach significantly enhances accuracy with agent policies optimized via large-scale reinforcement learning, we identify a critical gap in reliability: these agents fail to recognize their reasoning boundaries and rarely admit "I DON’T KNOW" even when evidence is insufficient or reasoning reaches its limit. The lack of reliability often leads to plausible but unreliable answers, introducing significant risks in many real-world scenarios. To this end, we propose Boundary-Aware Policy Optimization (BAPO), a novel RL framework designed to cultivate reliable boundary awareness without compromising accuracy. BAPO introduces two key components: (i) a group-based boundary-aware reward that encourages an IDK response only when the reasoning reaches its limit, and (ii) an adaptive reward modulator that strategically suspends this reward during early exploration, preventing the model from exploiting IDK as a shortcut. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that BAPO substantially enhances the overall reliability of agentic search.

Abstract:
Recent text-to-video (T2V) diffusion models have made remarkable progress in generating high-quality videos. However, they often struggle to align with complex text prompts, particularly when multiple objects, attributes, or spatial relations are specified. We introduce VideoRepair, the first self-correcting, training-free, and model-agnostic video refinement framework that automatically detects fine- grained text–video misalignments and performs targeted, localized corrections. Our key insight is that even misaligned videos usually contain correctly generated regions that should be preserved rather than regenerated. Building on this observation, VideoRepair proposes a novel region-preserving refinement strategy with three stages: (i) misalignment detection, where MLLM-based evaluation with automatically generated evaluation questions identifies misaligned regions; (ii) refinement planning, which preserves correctly generated entities, segments their regions across frames, and constructs targeted prompts for misaligned areas; and (iii) localized refinement, which selectively regenerates problematic regions while preserving faithful content through joint optimization of preserved and newly generated areas. On two benchmarks, EvalCrafter and T2V-CompBench with four recent T2V backbones, VideoRepair achieves substantial improvements over recent baselines across diverse alignment metrics. Comprehensive ablations further demonstrate the efficiency, robustness, and interpretability of our framework.

Abstract:
Post-training has emerged as a crucial paradigm for adapting large-scale pre-trained models to various tasks, whose effects are fully reflected by delta parameters (i.e., the disparity between post-trained and pre-trained parameters).While numerous studies have explored delta parameter properties via operations like pruning, quantization, low-rank approximation, and extrapolation, a fundamental question remains: what properties of delta parameters are essential for maintaining performance?In this work, we investigate delta parameter properties along two dimensions: magnitude and sign. Through experiments on instruct language models, reasoning language models, and vision models, we find that delta parameters exhibit considerable editability: individual values, distribution shape, relative relationships, and even signs can be substantially modified while maintaining post-trained model’s performance.To understand these phenomena, we propose a loss-based local surrogate analysis that examines editing effects through a second-order Taylor expansion. Our analysis introduces the concept of editing intensity, which helps explain the stability boundaries of different editing operations.

Abstract:
Multi-hop reasoning remains a fundamental challenge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Recent approaches—from adaptive retrieval to agentic pipelines—struggle to maintain coherent intermediate reasoning states as chains grow longer. We introduce State-Aware RAG, a framework that addresses this limitation through an explicit working memory that serves as a dynamic cognitive workspace for reasoning. Our modular architecture features a lightweight, trainable extractor that learns to actively filter, consolidate, and update this working memory via a novel Path-Outcome Dual Reward paradigm, which balances local coherence with global strategy. The retriever and generator remain frozen, enabling plug-and-play flexibility. Experiments on eight QA benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art results, on average achieving +8.6% over the best memory-augmented baseline and +9.3% over the best RL-enhanced baseline. Our architecture generalizes seamlessly to stronger generators and retrievers without retraining, establishing dynamic memory management as a critical yet underexplored dimension for advancing RAG systems.

Abstract:
Understanding whether one event increases or decreases the likelihood of another is critical for real-life applications. Unlike other relationships, promoting and inhibiting relationships capture directional, probabilistic, and context-dependent shifts in event likelihood. A central challenge is to estimate this relative influence from observational data: naive conditional probabilities conflate influence with correlation and are easily distorted by shared contextual confounders. We propose EPIR, a unified framework for estimating promoting and inhibiting relationships from observed event data. EPIR formulates influence as a relative directional effect under comparable contextual conditions, and models event context using : (i) observable history captured and (ii) latent multi-hop propagation mechanisms. EPIR combines context-conditioned predictive evidence with schema-based structural evidence to produce a single signed influence score, where the sign determines promotion versus inhibition. Experiments on real-world datasets show that EPIR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in accuracy.

Abstract:
The privacy leakage problem has become a critical topic in large language models, especially in the scenario of retrieval augmented generation.Current defense methods mitigate privacy leakage but are still suffering from the trade-off between privacy protection and response availability.To address the problem, we propose to explicitly capture the latent leakage tendency of LLM during the generation process, which is able to protect privacy from a more fundamental perspective.In detail, we propose ABack, a training-free mechanism that synchronously monitors the decoding steps, derives the initial leakage intention via modeling mental states, and rewrites the response with privacy awareness. In addition, we construct a new benchmark especially for personally identifiable information, considering the lack of formal privacy datasets.Experiments show that ABack improves privacy by up to 14% over strong baselines against adversarial attacks, avoiding the degradation of response utility.

Abstract:
Optimal configuration of the learning rate (LR) is a fundamental yet formidable challenge in large-scale pre-training. Given the stringent trade-off between training costs and model performance, the pivotal question is whether the optimal LR can be accurately extrapolated from low-cost experiments. In this paper, we formalize this investigation into two distinct research paradigms: Fitting and Transfer. Within the Fitting Paradigm, we innovatively introduce a Scaling Law for search factor, effectively reducing the search complexity from 𝒪(n 3 ) to 𝒪(n ⋅ C D ⋅ C 𝜂 ) via predictive modeling. Within the Transfer Paradigm, we extend the principles of 𝜇 Transfer to the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture, broadening its applicability to encompass model depth, weight decay, and token horizons.By pushing the boundaries of existing hyperparameter research in terms of scale, we conduct a comprehensive comparison between these two paradigms. Our empirical results challenge the scalability of the widely adopted 𝜇 Transfer in large-scale pre-training scenarios. Furthermore, we provide a rigorous analysis through the dual lenses of training stability and feature learning to elucidate the underlying reasons why module-wise parameter tuning underperforms in large-scale settings. This work offers systematic practical guidelines and a fresh theoretical perspective for optimizing industrial-level pre-training.

Abstract:
Recent advances in synergizing large reasoning models (LRMs) with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have shown promising results, yet two critical challenges remain: (1) reasoning models typically operate from a single, unchallenged perspective, limiting their ability to conduct deep, self-correcting reasoning over external documents, and (2) existing training paradigms rely excessively on outcome-oriented rewards, which provide insufficient signal for shaping the complex, multi-step reasoning process. To address these issues, we propose an Reasoner-Verifier framework named Adversarial Reasoning RAG (ARR). The Reasoner and Verifier engage in reasoning on retrieved evidence and critiquing each other’s logic while being guided by process-aware advantage that requires no external scoring model. This reward combines explicit observational signals with internal model uncertainty to jointly optimize reasoning fidelity and verification rigor. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our code is available at [link](https://github.com/lakhfskn/anonymous-code-of-arr).

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in text summarization, particularly through the integration of reinforcement learning. However, maintaining logical coherence and contextual consistency remains a pervasive challenge in long-form generation, often hindering the production of high-quality, unified summaries. To address these persistent issues, we propose TRAC, a framework that introduces a token-level reward function by integrating relative sentence gain, inter-sentence attention, and a Gaussian length penalty. By training a Process Reward Model (PRM) to provide fine-grained, step-wise supervision, TRAC ensures superior structural integrity and fluency during the generation process. Experimental results demonstrate that TRAC outperforms the sequence-level baseline by 11.05% in Fluency and 10.61% in Relevance. Furthermore, it achieves significant gains over competitive baselines such as FIGA and TLCR, underscoring its effectiveness and generalizability in high-quality NLP summarization.

Abstract:
While LLMs demonstrate remarkable fluency in narrative generation, existing methods struggle to maintain global narrative coherence, contextual logical consistency, and smooth character development, often producing monotonous scripts with structural fractures. To this end, we introduce PLOTTER, a framework that performs narrative planning on structural graph representations instead of direct sequential text representations in existing work. Specifically, PLOTTER executes the Evaluate-Plan-Revise cycle on the event graph and character graph. By diagnosing and repairing issues of the graph topology under rigorous logical constraints, the model optimizes the causality and narrative skeleton before complete context generation. Experiments demonstrate that PLOTTER significantly outperforms representative baselines across diverse narrative scenarios. These findings verify that manipulating narrative planning on structural graph representations—rather than direct text representations—is crucial to enhance the long-context reasoning of LLMs in complex narrative generation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models have shown strong performance in Machine Translation, yet they often suffer from paraphrasing errors, omissions, or hallucinations when the input contains translation-specific elements (e.g., URLs, slang, and idioms) that require strict preservation or controlled transformation, undermining the reliability of critical details.We propose CEMT, a Controllable Element-Oriented Machine Translation framework inspired by the analysis–strategy–generation paradigm in human translation. CEMT first employs an Element Detection Module to identify translation-specific elements, and then introduces a Translation Module that decomposes the translation process into linguistically grounded analysis, strategy formulation, and final generation, thereby guiding the reliable translation of these elements. We further introduce a CoT Judge model during training that provides step-wise supervision over the accuracy and consistency of the translation process.On the WMT23/24 Chinese–English benchmarks, CEMT improves performance over existing Machine Translation models while significantly reducing element-level constraint violations.

Abstract:
Typical large vision-language models (LVLMs) apply autoregressive supervision primarily to textual responses, without fully exploiting causal learning over rich visual inputs. As a result, these models often emphasize vision-to-language alignment while potentially overlooking fine-grained visual information. While prior work has explored autoregressive image generation, effectively leveraging autoregressive visual supervision to enhance image understanding remains an open challenge. In this paper, we introduce Autoregressive Semantic Visual Reconstruction (ASVR), which enables joint learning of visual and textual modalities within a unified autoregressive framework. ASVR trains models to autoregressively reconstruct the semantic content of input images, which consistently enhances multimodal comprehension. Notably, we show that even when provided with continuous image features as input, models can effectively reconstruct discrete semantic tokens, resulting in stable and consistent improvements across various multimodal understanding benchmarks. ASVR delivers significant performance gains and scalability across varying data scales, visual input, visual supervision and model architectures. In particular, ASVR generally improves baselines by 2-3% across 14 multimodal benchmarks.

Abstract:
Recently, human motion understanding has been a prominent area of research due to its critical importance in many fields. The key to advancing this understanding lies in the precise alignment between motion and linguistic modalities. Existing methods mainly follow two paradigms: global contrastive alignment and vocabulary space-based alignment. However, motion sequences exhibit sequential spatiotemporal dynamics while text conveys abstract semantics, leading to a fundamental mismatch in semantic levels and granularities. This undermines cross-modal alignment and results in suboptimal downstream performance. To alleviate this, we introduce a modality-shared codebook that enables unified representation learning and precise alignment of motion and linguistic modalities. Each codeword in the codebook is regularized to encode cross-modality shared semantics, and we leverage sparse activation and distribution consistency loss to enforce matched motion and text are represented by the same set of codewords. Additionally, we introduce a locality-aware Gaussian encoder to refine pose features and design a hard-negative guided loss to strengthen alignment discriminability. Extensive experiments across various language-motion evaluation, including text-motion retrieval, text-motion grounding, and motion caption, demonstrate that our model significantly surpasses current state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for LLM reasoning is often framed as balancing exploration and exploitation in action space, typically operationalized with token-level proxies (e.g., output entropy or confidence). We argue that this apparent trade-off is largely a measurement artifact: token-level statistics reflect next-token uncertainty rather than how reasoning progresses over multi-token semantic structures. We therefore study exploration and exploitation in the hidden-state space of response trajectories. We use Effective Rank (ER) to quantify representational exploration and introduce its temporal derivatives, Effective Rank Velocity (ERV) and Effective Rank Acceleration (ERA), to characterize exploitative refinement dynamics. Empirically and theoretically, ER and ERV exhibit near-zero correlation in semantic space, suggesting the two capacities can be improved simultaneously. Motivated by this, we propose Velocity-Exploiting Rank Learning (VERL), which shapes the RL advantage with an auxiliary signal derived from ER/ERV and uses the more stable ERA as a meta-control variable to adaptively balance the incentives. Across multiple base models, RL algorithms, and reasoning benchmarks, VERL yields consistent improvements, including large gains on challenging tasks (e.g., 21.4% in Gaokao 2024).

Abstract:
Poetry has long been a central art form for Arabic speakers, serving as a powerful medium of expression and cultural identity. While modern Arabic speakers continue to value poetry, existing research on Arabic poetry within Large Language Models (LLMs) has primarily focused on analysis tasks such as interpretation or metadata prediction, e.g., rhyme schemes and titles. In contrast, our work addresses the practical aspect of poetry creation in Arabic by introducing controllable generation capabilities to assist users in writing poetry. Specifically, we present a large-scale, carefully curated instruction-based dataset in Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) and various Arabic dialects. This dataset enables tasks such as writing, revising, and continuing poems based on predefined criteria, including style and rhyme, as well as performing poetry analysis. Our experiments show that fine-tuning LLMs on this dataset yields models that can effectively generate poetry that is aligned with user requirements, based on both automated metrics and human evaluation with native Arabic speakers. The data and the code are available at https://github.com/mbzuai-nlp/instructpoet-ar

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are making significant progress in multimodal reasoning. Early approaches focus on pure text-based reasoning. More recent studies have incorporated multimodal information into the reasoning steps; however, they often follow a single task-specific reasoning pattern, which limits their generalizability across various multimodal tasks. In fact, there are numerous multimodal tasks requiring diverse reasoning skills, such as zooming in on a specific region or marking an object within an image. To address this, we propose unified generative multimodal reasoning, which unifies diverse multimodal reasoning skills by generating intermediate images during the reasoning process. We instantiate this paradigm with Omni-R1, a two-stage SFT+RL framework featuring perception alignment loss and perception reward, thereby enabling functional image generation. Additionally, we introduce Omni-R1-Zero, which eliminates the need for multimodal annotations by bootstrapping step-wise visualizations from text-only reasoning data. Empirical results show that Omni-R1 achieves unified generative reasoning across a wide range of multimodal tasks, and Omni-R1-Zero can match or even surpass Omni-R1 on average, suggesting a promising direction for generative multimodal reasoning. The code and checkpoints are attached for reproducibility and subsequent open release.

Abstract:
Chain-of-thought (CoT) often improves multi-step reasoning, but it remains unclear what kind of additional sequential computation longer traces actually enable. We connect CoT to Bennett’s logical depth, separating an answer’s description length from the sequential effort required to derive it, and view a CoT budget of T steps as a qualitative cap on realizable sequential computation. To operationalize realized depth beyond raw length, we introduce Effective Logical Depth (ELD), a deletion-based measure of step necessity under a specified inference interface. Across depth-controlled prefix-sum tasks and GSM8K rationale perturbations, we observe two consistent signatures of a Time-for-Accuracy tradeoff: (i) plateau-to-transition accuracy curves as the budget increases from being below to matching the task’s required depth, and (ii) sparse, position-dependent deletion sensitivity concentrated in early steps for deeper instances. On GSM8K, an Extract interface, where the model reads off the answer from the remaining rationale, remains near-perfect even after prefix deletions, whereas a Repair interface, where the model must re-solve from truncated rationale context, degrades markedly. Moreover, Socratic human rationales are consistently more robust than Main rationales under Repair. These results suggest that longer CoT helps primarily when it enables additional effective sequential computation, and that deletion-based diagnostics can distinguish computational steps from redundant ones.

Abstract:
Parallel thinking offers a promising avenue for scaling test-time compute in Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling them to explore diverse solution paths simultaneously before aggregating them into a final answer. However, coordinating the exploration and aggregation stages remains challenging, as simple aggregation techniques often incur information loss, failing to preserve the subtle, decision-relevant signals generated during exploration. To overcome this, we propose Rhombus, a parallel thinking framework that explicitly incentivizes coordination between components via end-to-end reinforcement learning. Rhombus employs multiple parallel Proposers to generate compact, decision-focused reasoning cues and a central Synthesizer to integrate them into final predictions, utilizing co-training under a shared task reward to align their interaction. Across challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, Rhombus improves accuracy by 6.0% over long chain-of-thought baselines while reducing wall-clock latency by 39.4% under matched token budgets. Our work demonstrates that explicit communication optimization is essential for realizing the accuracy and efficiency gains of parallel reasoning.

Abstract:
Despite the widespread adoption of text embedding models, selecting the optimal model for a specific target corpus remains challenging due to the lack of task-specific labels. While task-agnostic evaluation offers a promising solution by relying on unlabeled data, existing approaches based on kernel estimators or Gaussian mixtures fail to model high-dimensional distributions effectively, resulting in unstable rankings. To address this limitation, we propose FLARE (Flow-based Label-free Assessment of Representation Embeddings), which employs normalizing flows to estimate information sufficiency in high-dimensional spaces. By learning invertible transformations, flows enable exact density estimation while mitigating the instability inherent in distance-based methods. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that our estimation error depends on the data’s intrinsic structure rather than its raw dimensionality. Experiments across 11 datasets demonstrate that FLARE achieves a strong Spearman’s ρ (up to 0.90) with supervised benchmarks, remaining robust even for high-dimensional embeddings (d ≥ 3,584).

Abstract:
As large language model (LLM) based systems take on high-stakes roles in real-world decision-making, they must reconcile competing instructions from multiple sources within a single prompt context. Enforcing an instruction hierarchy, where higher-level directives override lower-priority requests, is critical to the reliability and controllability of LLMs. In this work, we reframe instruction hierarchy resolution as a reasoning task. The model must first "think" about the relationship between a given user prompt and higher-priority instructions before generating a response. To enable this capability, we construct VerIH, a training dataset of constraint-following tasks with verifiable answers, comprising aligned and conflicting system–user instructions. We show that lightweight reinforcement learning with VerIH effectively transfers general reasoning capabilities of models to instruction prioritization. Our method leads to consistent improvements across multiple model families and scales on instruction following and instruction hierarchy benchmarks, achieving ~20% absolute improvement in conflict setups. Our method also generalizes to safety-critical scenarios beyond the training distribution, exhibiting increased robustness against jailbreak and prompt injection, reducing absolute attack success rates by up to 20%. Our results establish reasoning over instruction hierarchies as a practical mechanism for improving AI reliability, where targeted updates to system prompts produce predictable, controllable, and robust changes in model behavior.

Abstract:
Preference alignment methods such as RLHF and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) improve instruction following, but they can also reinforce hallucinations when preference judgments reward fluency and confidence over factual correctness. We introduce F-DPO (Factuality-aware Direct Preference Optimization), a simple extension of DPO that uses only binary factuality labels. F-DPO (i) applies a label-flipping transformation that corrects misordered preference pairs so the chosen response is never less factual than the rejected one, and (ii) adds a factuality-aware margin that emphasizes pairs with clear correctness differences, while reducing to standard DPO when both responses share the same factuality. We construct factuality-aware preference data by augmenting DPO pairs with binary factuality indicators and synthetic hallucinated variants. Across seven open-weight LLMs (1B–14B), F-DPO consistently improves factuality and reduces hallucination rates relative to both base models and standard DPO. On Qwen3-8B, F-DPO reduces hallucination rates by 5×(from 0.424 to 0.084) while improving factuality scores by 50% (from 5.26 to 7.90). F-DPO also generalizes to out-of-distribution benchmarks: on TruthfulQA, Qwen2.5-14B achieves +17% MC1 accuracy (0.500 to 0.585) and +49% MC2 accuracy (0.357 to 0.531). F-DPO requires no auxiliary reward model, token-level annotations, or multi-stage training.

Abstract:
PseudoSeer is a novel search engine for academic pseudocode, enabling retrieval over 320,000 algorithm implementations extracted from the arXiv. Using the system’s caption-reference pairs, we study asymmetric retrieval, matching short queries with a median length of five words against long documents of roughly 300 words composed primarily of natural language with limited LaTeX notation. Our evaluation reveals scaling limitations in embedding models: a 149M parameter encoder outperforms 1.5B parameter alternatives, while BM25 remains competitive with pretrained models. Analyzing attention patterns over 33,000 caption document pairs, we identify two factors driving these results: attention efficiency and attention concentration. Models that significantly attend to sinks or non-discriminative tokens leave less attention for discriminative content, while models with overly diffuse attention fail to form discriminative representations. Guided by these findings, PseudoSeer’s embedding model, trained via contrastive learning with efficient attention patterns, outperforms the best pretrained model by 8.7 points. A hybrid approach combining learned embeddings with BM25 reaches 66.5% R@10. PseudoSeer is deployed at pseudoseer.ist.psu.edu as both a practical search system and a benchmark for retrieval evaluation.

Abstract:
Graph topology is a fundamental determinant of memory leakage in multi-agent LLM systems, yet its effects remain poorly quantified. We introduce MAMA (Multi-Agent Memory Attack), a controlled evaluation framework for comparing topology-conditioned memory leakage in multi-agent LLM systems. MAMA operates on synthetic documents containing labeled Personally Identifiable Information (PII) entities, from which we generate sanitized task instructions. We execute a two-phase protocol: Engram (seeding private information into a target agent’s memory) and Resonance (multi-round interaction where an attacker attempts extraction). Over 10 rounds, we measure leakage using a two-stage recovery criterion that combines exact-match extraction with LLM-based inference over the attacker’s final output. We evaluate six canonical topologies (complete, circle, chain, tree, star, star-ring) across n∈4,5,6 , attacker–target placements, and base models. Results are consistent: denser connectivity, shorter attacker–target distance, and higher target centrality increase leakage; most leakage occurs in early rounds and then plateaus; model choice shifts absolute rates but preserves broad structural trends; spatiotemporal/location attributes leak more readily than identity credentials or regulated identifiers. We distill practical guidance for system design: favor sparse or hierarchical connectivity, maximize attacker–target separation, and restrict hub/shortcut pathways via topology-aware access control. Our code is available at https://github.com/llll121/mama-eval.

Abstract:
In few-shot learning, the selection of samples has a significant impact on the performance of the model. While effective sample selection strategies are well-established in supervised settings, research on large language models largely overlooks them, favouring strategies specifically tailored to individual in-context learning settings. In this paper, we propose a new method for Automatic Combination of SamplE Selection Strategies (ACSESS) to leverage the strengths and complementarity of various well-established selection objectives. We investigate and compare the impact of 23 sample selection strategies on the performance of 5 in-context learning models and 3 few-shot learning approaches (meta-learning, few-shot fine-tuning) over 6 text and 8 image datasets. The experimental results show that the combination of strategies through the ACSESS method consistently outperforms all individual selection strategies and performs on par or exceeds the in-context learning specific baselines. Lastly, we demonstrate that sample selection remains effective even on smaller datasets, yielding the greatest benefits when only a few shots are selected, while its advantage diminishes as the number of shots increases.

Abstract:
Weight tying, i.e. sharing parameters between input and output embedding matrices, is common practice in language model design, yet its impact on the learned embedding space remains poorly understood. In this paper, we show that tied embedding matrices align more closely with output (unembedding) matrices than with input embeddings of comparable untied models, indicating that the shared matrix is shaped primarily for output prediction rather than input representation. This unembedding bias arises because output gradients dominate early in training. Using tuned lens analysis, we show this negatively affects early-layer computations, which contribute less effectively to the residual stream. Scaling input gradients during training reduces this bias, providing causal evidence for the role of gradient imbalance. This is mechanistic evidence that weight tying optimizes the embedding matrix for output prediction, compromising its role in input representation. These results help explain why weight tying can harm performance at scale and have implications for training smaller LLMs, where the embedding matrix contributes substantially to total parameter count.

Abstract:
The growing ubiquity of Extended Reality (XR) is driving Conversational Recommendation Systems (CRS) toward visually immersive experiences. We formalize this paradigm as Immersive CRS (ICRS), where recommended items are highlighted directly in the user’s scene-based visual environment and augmented with in-situ labels. While item recommendation has been widely studied, the problem of how to select and evaluate which information to present as immersive labels remains an open problem. To this end, we introduce a principled categorization of information needs into explicit intent satisfaction and proactive information needs and use these to define novel evaluation metrics for item label selection. We benchmark IR-, LLM-, and VLM-based methods across three datasets and ICRS scenarios: fashion, movie recommendation, and retail shopping. Our evaluation reveals three important limitations of existing methods: (1) they fail to leverage scenario-specific information modalities (e.g., visual cues for fashion, metadata for retail), (2) they present redundant information that is visually inferable, and (3) they poorly anticipate users’ proactive information needs from explicit dialogue alone. In summary, this work provides both a novel evaluation paradigm for in-situ item labeling in ICRS and highlights key challenges for future work.

Abstract:
Stance detection aims to ascertain whether an author’s text is in favor, against, or neutral toward specific targets like public policies or social issues. While pretrained language models (PLMs) have greatly enhanced stance detection, they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks—manipulations that maintain textual semantics but lead to incorrect predictions. Such vulnerabilities remain underexplored for stance detection. In this study, we introduce StanceAttack, an innovative adversarial attack method leveraging ChatGPT to create adversarial examples that can mislead well-trained stance detection models. We conduct experiments to evaluate our attack model by attacking state-of-the-art PLMs on two benchmark datasets. Results demonstrate that StanceAttack outperforms traditional adversarial methods with higher success rates and fewer retries. Human evaluations confirm that our adversarial examples preserve the original semantic meanings and naturalness. We share our code and data in https://github.com/chenyez/StanceAttack.

Abstract:
We revisit continual pre-training for large language models and argue that progress now depends less on scaling parameters than on scaling the right structure. We introduce SCALE, a width upscaling architecture that inserts lightweight expansions into linear modules while freezing all pre-trained parameters, preserving residual and attention topologies and increasing capacity without perturbing the base model’s original functionality. SCALE follows two principles: Persistent Preservation, which maintains the base model’s behavior via preservation-oriented initialization and freezing of the pre-trained weights, and Collaborative Adaptation, which trains only selected expansion components to acquire new knowledge with minimal interference. We instantiate these ideas as SCALE-Preserve (preservation-first), SCALE-Adapt (adaptation-first), and SCALE-Route, an optional routing extension that performs token-level routing between preservation and adaptation heads. On a controlled synthetic biography benchmark, SCALE reduces the severe forgetting seen in depth expansion while still learning new knowledge. In continual pre-training on a Korean corpus, SCALE variants forget less on English evaluations and achieve competitive gains on Korean benchmarks, yielding the best overall stability-plasticity trade-off. We further analyze when preservation holds provably and why combining preservation and adaptation stabilizes optimization relative to standard continual learning.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can enhance large language models (LLMs) by providing external knowledge and helping reduce hallucinations. In multimodal RAG, however, retrieval remains challenging because a single retriever may fail to capture fine-grained multimodal semantics, and visually or semantically similar entities may still contain misleading information for answer generation. We propose a progressive multimodal re-ranking framework with curriculum learning to improve CLIP-based visual coarse-grained retrieval. Our framework progressively refines retrieval results through two stages: fine-grained section-level re-ranking and multimodal section reassessment. To better align re-ranking with multimodal queries, we introduce a curriculum-learning strategy that trains the model with hard negatives that are visually or semantically similar but contain misleading information. Experiments on InfoSeek and Enc-VQA show that our method achieves state-of-the-art answer accuracy and competitive retrieval performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate decision-making tasks involving personal data sharing, where privacy concerns and prosocial motivations can push choices in opposite directions. Existing evaluations often measure privacy-related attitudes or sharing intentions in isolation, which makes it difficult to determine whether a model’s expressed values jointly predict its downstream data-sharing actions as in real human behaviors. We introduce a context-based assessment protocol that sequentially administers standardized questionnaires for privacy attitudes, prosocialness, and acceptance of data sharing within a bounded, history-carrying session. To evaluate value-action alignments under competing attitudes, we use multi-group structural equation modeling (MGSEM) to identify relations from privacy concerns and prosocialness to data sharing. We propose Value-Action Alignment Rate (VAAR), a human-referenced directional agreement metric that aggregates path-level evidence for expected signs. Across multiple LLMs, we observe stable but model-specific Privacy-PSA-AoDS profiles, and substantial heterogeneity in value-action alignment.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly expected to support pluralistic alignment, representing diverse human perspectives. However, current methods often induce motivated reasoning: LLMs tend to hallucinate “convenient” facts to forcefully justify a requested stance. To address this, we propose Value-Graph-Consistent Chain-of-Thought (VGC-CoT), a neuro-symbolic framework that enables steerable pluralism without distorting objective reality. We enforce a strict distinction: facts should be shared, while value trade-offs may diverge. Our approach models reasoning as a directed traversal over a multi-perspective graph comprising a fixed factual layer and perspective-specific value layers. By projecting generated CoT paths onto this structure, we align the model with target values while constraining it to a shared factual backbone. Experiments show that our method reduces factual hallucinations by 3× and improves cross-perspective consistency by 25% compared to standard steerable baselines, paving the way for trustworthy pluralistic AI.

Abstract:
As AI systems increasingly mediate everyday communication, large language models (LLMs) are expected not only to provide factually accurate responses but also to generate explanations that engage with users’ mental states. We build on the concept of cognitive chains—structured representations of Situation, Clue, Thought, Action, and Emotion inspired by Theory of Mind—to investigate whether conditioning LLM outputs on such belief chains improves explanation quality. Specifically, we evaluate explanations along six reader-perceived dimensions: overall quality, logical correctness, completeness, conciseness, empathy, and agreement. Prior work shows that LLM explanations often default to neutral or uncertain stances, while individuals holding strong false beliefs remain highly resistant to correction. To address this challenge, we instantiate cognitive chains from two perspectives: believers and non-believers of the news claims. Using GPT-4.1 as a role-player across these stances, we find that incorporating believers’ chains improves the perceived quality of explanations for audiences with misinformation-aligned beliefs. Our findings underscore the importance of modeling diverse mental states in explanation generation and provide the first systematic evidence that Theory-of-Mind–based cognitive chains enhance the persuasiveness of explanations in misinformation contexts.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate text quality, moderate content, and assess arguments. We investigate whether alignment-instilled prior beliefs bias LLM judgments, using persuasion evaluation as a representative task. We find a systematic failure: models conflate their trained beliefs with rhetorical quality, rating identical claims differently based on belief alignment rather than argumentative merit. A bare assertion aligned with training receives higher scores than a well-crafted counter-argument, even when explicitly instructed to judge rhetoric alone. We introduce ConvinceQA, a dataset of 27,756 persuasive arguments with controlled stance variation across subjective, harmful, and misinformation domains, and demonstrate this prior prejudice across models. We exploit this failure through persuasion-based probing: evaluating minimal pairs that differ only in the subject token bypasses learned refusals and reveals hidden biases. Analysis identifies three failure modes, with belief-conditioned rating inflation accounting for 88% of cases. Cross-task validation on essay quality assessment and debate judging confirms this is a pervasive limitation.

Abstract:
Acceptability judgments provide a crucial basis for understanding how sentences are perceived as natural or well-formed, and they are increasingly used to assess the linguistic capability of large language models (LLMs). Unlike grammaticality, acceptability depends not only on structural form but also on contextual and domain-specific factors. Most prior work evaluates sentences in isolation, and relatively little is known about how explicit contextual cues influence LLM acceptability judgments across domains. This study examines how contextual information affects model-generated acceptability ratings across multiple domains and several LLMs, using different forms of domain-specific contextual cues to situate sentences in their intended usage settings. The results show that context can meaningfully shift model judgments, although its effects vary across models and domains. Overall, the findings provide evidence on contextual effects in LLM acceptability judgment and support the development of more context-aware evaluation frameworks.

Abstract:
Hallucination detection remains a significant challenge for large language models. Existing agentic applications rely on LLMs to self-assess the factuality of their outputs using single-step “LLM-as-a-judge” prompts. However, even when equipped with ground truth information, current LLMs still fall short in detecting hallucinations, and this one-shot evaluation offers neither the transparency nor the granularity needed to diagnose where and why the detection fails. To address this gap, we introduce PROBE (Process-based Benchmark for Hallucination Detection), a comprehensive benchmark that breaks down hallucination detection into four critical steps: claim decomposition, evidence finding, evidence evaluation, and hallucination localization, and evaluates each step individually. PROBE consists of 12,000 test cases across three task types—summarization, question answering, and style transfer. Critically, we demonstrate that when hallucination detection is treated as a multi-step process, all models achieve considerably better performance. Through extensive evaluation, we show that current LLMs struggle chiefly with evidence finding, and that finetuning on our released training data substantially improves performance on this step. PROBE represents a significant step toward more transparent, diagnosable, and robust hallucination detection systems.

Abstract:
Traditional reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) optimizes policies on fixed training inputs, limiting the diversity of learning signals. We propose JODP (Joint Optimization of Data and Policy), a framework where the evolving policy model generates improved variants of training problems to enhance its own learning. While training problems remain fixed, JODP optimizes how they are presented: the policy generates specification hints that guide rollout generation, then learns to reproduce the discovered high-reward behaviors without the hints. This "if you can solve it with a hint, learn to solve it without one" principle creates a co-evolutionary dynamic where better policies discover better specifications, which enable further policy improvement. JODP operates as a plug-and-play enhancement to existing algorithms: specifications are selected via UCB bandits for exploration-exploitation balance, used only during training rollouts, and discarded at deployment. Through evaluation on safety alignment tasks, we demonstrate consistent improvements with GRPO, RLOO, and REINFORCE++, allowing 4B models to approach 8B model performance using less than 1% additional computational overhead.

Abstract:
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) provide structured and interpretable representations of real-world entities and relations. While dynamic KGs attempt to capture real-time changes, they typically treat updates as independent facts. This overlooks a critical challenge: a factual, localized update can contradict and invalidate previously correct knowledge, requiring revisions beyond the localized update to maintain KG consistency. Many of these inconsistencies arise from events whose effects propagate through relational dependencies, necessitating coordinated multi-hop reasoning rather than isolated changes. To address this, we introduce a model-agnostic framework for cascading KG update identification that leverages conformal prediction to provide reliable uncertainty guarantees over the cascade as a whole, accounting for dependencies among multi-hop update candidates. Building on this foundation, we further develop a graph-based KG update scoring framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) to enrich event representations with world knowledge. Experiments on two newly constructed real-world datasets, designed to reflect scenarios where events necessitate coordinated multi-hop updates, demonstrate that our framework establishes a strong baseline while offering calibrated confidence estimates, providing an effective solution for event-driven KG consistency restoration.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling improves the inference performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) but also incurs substantial computational costs. Although recent studies have reduced token consumption through dynamic self-consistency, they remain constrained by the high latency of sequential requests. In this paper, we propose SeerSC, a dynamic self-consistency framework that simultaneously improves token efficiency and latency by integrating System 1 and System 2 reasoning. Specifically, we utilize the rapid System 1 to compute the answer entropy for given queries. This score is then used to evaluate the potential of samples for scaling, enabling dynamic self-consistency under System 2. Benefiting from the advance and accurate estimation provided by System 1, the proposed method can reduce token usage while simultaneously achieving a significant decrease in latency through parallel generation. It outperforms existing methods, achieving up to a 47% reduction in token consumption and a 43% reduction in inference latency without significant performance loss.

Abstract:
Although Large Language Models undergo rigorous safety alignment, they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Existing methods, particularly gradient-based prompt optimization, suffer from high computational costs and produce uninterpretable, high-perplexity inputs. While recent logit-space attacks improve efficiency, they often rely on cumbersome auxiliary models or complex pipelines. In this work, we propose Sparse Index-Based Intervention (SIBI), a white-box, inference-time jailbreak that bypasses guardrails via lightweight, sparse logit editing. SIBI operates without gradients or auxiliary models, modifying pre-softmax logits using a compact, tokenizer-aligned dictionary of penalty and reward tokens. By incorporating temperature-consistent scaling and a mixed-norm trust region, the method ensures attack effectiveness while preserving generation fluency. On standard benchmarks, SIBI achieves high attack success rates while reducing computational overhead and space overhead compared to optimization baselines.

Abstract:
State-of-the-art large multi-modal models (LMMs) face challenges when processing high-resolution images, as these inputs are converted into enormous visual tokens, many of which are irrelevant to the downstream task. In this paper, we propose Multi-turn Grounding-based Policy Optimization (MGPO), an end-to-end reinforcement learning (RL) framework that enables LMMs to iteratively focus on key visual regions by automatically cropping sub-images, based on model-predicted grounding coordinates within a multi-turn conversation framework. Compared to supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which requires costly additional grounding annotations, our approach highlights that LMMs can emerge robust grounding abilities during the RL training process, leveraging only a binary reward function derived from the correctness of the final answer. Additionally, we observe that LMMs struggle to autonomously trigger visual grounding during the rollout process. To address this cold start problem, we design a multi-turn conversational template and restrict policy loss computation to model outputs generated across multiple dialogue rounds, thereby promoting stable optimization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, when trained on standard visual-question-short answering data without grounding annotations, MGPO effectively elicits stronger grounding capabilities compared to GRPO, leading to 5.4% improvement on in-distribution MME-Realworld and 5.2% improvement on the challenging out-of-distribution (OOD) V Bench. Notably, MGPO post-training on Qwen2.5-VL-7B with 21K samples surpasses OpenAI’s o1 and GPT-4o models on the OOD V Bench.

Abstract:
Confidence in LLMs is a useful indicator of model uncertainty and answer reliability. Existing work mainly focused on single-turn scenarios, while research on confidence in complex multi-turn interactions is limited. In this paper, we investigate whether LLM-based search agents have the ability to communicate their own confidence through verbalized confidence scores after long sequences of actions, a significantly more challenging task compared to outputting confidence in a single interaction. Experimenting on open-source agentic models, we first find that models exhibit much higher task accuracy at high confidence while having near-zero accuracy when confidence is low. Based on this observation, we propose Test-Time Scaling (TTS) methods that use confidence scores to determine answer quality, encourage the model to try again until reaching a satisfactory confidence level. Results show that our proposed methods significantly reduce token consumption while demonstrating competitive performance compared to baseline fixed budget TTS methods.

Abstract:
The tasks of idiom understanding and dialect understanding are both well-established benchmarks in natural language processing. In this paper, we propose combining them, and using regional idioms as a test of dialect understanding. Towards this end, we propose three new benchmark datasets for the Quebec dialect of French: QFrCoRE, which contains 4,633 instances of idiomatic phrases, and QFrCoRT, which comprises 171 regional instances of idiomatic words, and a new benchmark for French Metropolitan expressions, MFrCoE, which comprises 4,938 phrases.We explain how to construct these corpora, so that our methodology can be replicated for other dialects. Our experiments with 111 LLMs reveal a critical disparity in dialectal competence: while models perform well on French Metropolitan, 65.77% of them perform significantly worse on Quebec idioms, with only 9.0% favoring the regional dialect. These results confirm that our benchmarks are a reliable tool for quantifying the dialect gap and that prestige-language proficiency does not guarantee regional dialect understanding.

Abstract:
Autoregressive (AR) language models and Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) constitute the two principal paradigms of large language models. However, both paradigms suffer from insufficient reasoning capabilities. Human reasoning inherently relies on causal knowledge and thought, which are reflected in natural language. But in the AR paradigm, language is modeled as next token prediction (a strictly left-to-right, token-by-token order), whereas natural language itself exhibits more flexible causal structures. In the DLM paradigm, the attention mechanism is fully connected, which entirely disregards causal order. To fill this gap, we propose the Causal Concept-Guided Diffusion Language Model (C 2 DLM). Starting from DLM’s fully connected attention, C 2 DLM first obtains a concept-level causal graph from the teacher model, and then explicitly guides attention to learn causal relationships between concepts. By focusing on causal relationships and avoiding interference from difficult subgoals involving causal inversion, C 2 DLM achieves a 12% improvement and a 3.2× training speedup on the COT-OrderPerturb task, along with an average gain of 1.31% across six downstream reasoning tasks. Code and data are available here.

Abstract:
The ubiquity of text-attributed graph data has highlighted the need for graph learning models with exceptional generalization across diverse textual and structural contexts. Current approaches struggle to extract generalizable insights from heterogeneous graph data, requiring extensive fine-tuning and limiting versatility across domains. In this work, we propose AnyGraph, a unified graph foundation model designed to handle key challenges: i) Structure Heterogenity - addressing distribution shift in graph structural patterns; ii) Feature Heterogenity - handling diverse textual representations; iii) Fast Adaptation - efficiently adapting to new graph-text domains. We build AnyGraph upon a Graph Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with a lightweight expert routing mechanism that effectively manages cross-domain distribution shift. Extensive experiments on 38 diverse datasets demonstrate AnyGraph’s strong zero-shot performance across domains with significant distribution shift, validating its fast adaptation ability and scaling law emergence. Our model is open-sourced and available at: https://github.com/HKUDS/AnyGraph.

Abstract:
Due to the prevalence of large language models (LLMs), key-value (KV) cache reduction for LLM inference has received remarkable attention. Among numerous works that have been proposed in recent years, layer-wise token pruning approaches, which select a subset of tokens at particular layers to retain in KV cache and prune others, are one of the most popular schemes. They primarily adopt a set of pre-defined layers, at which tokens are selected. Such design is inflexible in the sense that the accuracy significantly varies across tasks and deteriorates in harder tasks such as KV retrieval. In this paper, we propose ASL, a training-free method that adaptively chooses the selection layer for KV cache reduction, exploiting the variance of token ranks ordered by attention score. The proposed method balances the performance across different tasks while meeting the user-specified KV budget requirement. ASL operates during the prefilling stage and can be jointly used with existing KV cache reduction methods such as SnapKV to optimize the decoding stage. By evaluations on the InfiniteBench, RULER, and NIAH benchmarks, we show that ASL, equipped with one-shot token selection, adaptively trades inference speed for accuracy, outperforming state-of-the-art layer-wise token pruning methods in difficult tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) seem to offer an easy path to interpretability: just ask them to explain their answers. Yet the features driving an answer often differ from those emphasized in its explanation, meaning post-hoc rationales can misrepresent what actually shaped the model’s output. We quantify this gap by comparing the feature-importance distributions of answers and their explanations. Prior analyses reveal such discrepancies, but large-scale study has been limited by the high computational cost of attribution methods. To address this, we introduce the Post-hoc Self-Consistency Bank (PSCB), a large-scale benchmark linking model decisions with diverse explanations and attribution vectors across datasets, methods, and model families. Using PSCB, we find that Spearman rank correlation provides a more reliable signal of alignment than cosine similarity. Building on this insight, we apply Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to attribution-based preference data, improving alignment without degrading task accuracy, and show that standard supervised fine-tuning on the same data fails to achieve comparable gains. These improvements generalize robustly across domains, paving the way toward scalable and faithful alignment between LLM decisions and their natural language explanations.

Abstract:
Although LLM-based agents are proven to master tool orchestration in scientific fields, particularly chemistry, their single-task performance remains limited by underlying tool constraints. To this end, we propose tool amplification, a novel paradigm that enhances the collective capabilities of specialized tools through optimized, dynamic coordination within individual tasks. Instantiating this paradigm, we introduce ChemAmp, a computationally lightweight framework that dynamically treats chemistry tools (e.g., UniMol2, Chemformer) as composable building-block agents. It constructs task-specialized super-agents that transcend atomic tool constraints with limited data (≤10 samples). Our evaluations across four core chemistry tasks molecular design, molecule captioning, reaction prediction, and property prediction demonstrate that ChemAmp outperforms chemistry-specialized models, generalist LLMs, and agent systems with tool orchestration. Critically, this bottom-up construction strategy enables 94% inference token cost reductions versus vanilla multi-agent systems.

Abstract:
With the widespread proliferation of the Internet, the spread of fake news has accelerated significantly, evolving from single-text content to multimodal forms that include images and videos. The task of Multimodal Fake News Detection (MFND) takes both text and relevant images as input for fake news identification. However, issues such as image noise and inaccurate focus of visual features often lead to insufficient attention to critical information within images during multimodal fusion. To effectively address these challenges, we propose a covariance matrix-driven image channel allocation method. This method first expands the number of original channel maps, then evaluates the importance of image channels through the covariance matrix and assigns importance scores to the expanded channel maps, thereby redirecting the focus of visual features. Subsequently, we design a multimodal fusion strategy based on a multilayer co-attention mechanism to achieve dynamic fusion across modalities. Finally, a contrastive learning loss is introduced to enhance the alignment between textual and visual modalities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on three public multimodal fake news detection benchmark datasets.

Abstract:
Large language model-based agents have recently emerged as powerful approaches for solving dynamic and multi-step tasks. Most existing agents employ planning mechanisms to guide long-term actions in dynamic environments. However, current planning approaches face a fundamental limitation that they operate at a fixed granularity level. Specifically, they either provide excessive detail for simple tasks or insufficient detail for complex ones, failing to achieve an optimal balance between simplicity and complexity. Drawing inspiration from the principle of progressive refinement in cognitive science, we propose AdaPlan-H, a self-adaptive hierarchical planning mechanism that mimics human planning strategies. Our method initiates with a coarse-grained macro plan and progressively refines it based on task complexity. It generates self-adaptive hierarchical plans tailored to the varying difficulty levels of different tasks, which can be optimized by imitation learning and capability enhancement. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves task execution success rates while mitigating overthinking at the planning level, providing a flexible and efficient solution for multi-step complex decision-making tasks. To contribute to the community, our code and data will be made publicly available at .

Abstract:
Recent Long-Context Language Models (LCLMs) can process hundreds of thousands of tokens in a single prompt, enabling new opportunities for knowledge-intensive multi-hop reasoning by integrating large sets of retrieved documents or, in some cases, directly all necessary information. However, simply feeding more documents into the context window fails to capture how evidence should be connected. We address this gap with thought templates, reusable reasoning patterns derived from prior problem solving that structure how evidence is combined and guide multi-hop inference alongside factual documents. To keep these templates effective, we propose an update strategy that iteratively refines templates derived from training data through natural-language feedback. Across diverse benchmarks and LCLM families, our approach delivers consistent gains over strong baselines in both retrieval-based and retrieval-free settings. Furthermore, we show that optimized templates can be distilled into relatively smaller open-source models, demonstrating its broad applicability. We refer to our framework as Thought Template Augmented LCLMs (ToTAL).

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems require large language models (LLMs) to reconcile discrepancies between their parametric memory—knowledge encoded during training—and contextual inputs provided at inference. When these sources conflict, models often exhibit unstable reasoning and inconsistent factual behavior. We investigate how LLMs resolve such conflicts when the discrepancy arises from temporal misalignment—facts that have changed since the model’s knowledge cutoff—and whether mutability, the changeability of facts, can serve as a mediating signal in this process. To do so, we provide WIKIRECENTCHANGES, a temporally grounded benchmark with stable and recently updated facts derived from Wikidata.Our results show that while models spontaneously produce temporal reasoning for facts that actually changed — but almost never for stable ones — this differentiation rarely propagates to their final predictions. Explicitly prompting them to consider mutability increases references to temporal change but does not improve factual accuracy, revealing a disconnect between verbalized reasoning and prediction behavior. We further show that the failure point is scale-dependent: smaller models rarely detect the underlying conflict, while larger models detect it but fail to act on their mutability judgments.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Large Generative Models (LGMs) have revolutionized multi-modal generation. However, generating illustrated storybooks remains an open challenge, where prior works mainly decompose this task into separate stages, and thus, holistic multi-modal grounding remains limited. Besides, while safety alignment is studied for text- or image-only generation, existing works rarely integrate child-specific safety constraints into narrative planning and sequence-level multi-modal verification. To address these limitations, we propose BookAgent, a safety-aware multi-agent collaboration framework designed for high-quality, safety-aware visual narratives. Different from prior story visualization models that assume a fixed storyline sequence, BookAgent targets end-to-end storybook synthesis from a user draft by jointly planning, scripting, illustrating, and globally repairing inconsistencies. To ensure precise multi-modal grounding, BookAgent dynamically calibrates page-level alignment between textual scripts and visual layouts. Furthermore, BookAgent calibrates holistic consistency from the temporal dimension, by verifying-then-rectifying global inconsistencies in character identity and storytelling logic. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BookAgent significantly outperforms current methods in narrative coherence, visual consistency, and safety compliance, offering a robust paradigm for reliable agents in complex multi-modal creation. The implementation will be publicly released at https://github.com/bogao-code/BookAgent/tree/main.

Abstract:
Live-stream E-commerce faces significant challenges from morphs, deliberate linguistic variants used to evade real-time voice filters and amplify product claims illegally. While critical for regulatory enforcement, Live Auditory Morph Resolution (LiveAMR) research is hindered by limited datasets: prior work relied on narrow, redundant health domain corpora, restricting model robustness. To bridge this gap, we introduce two datasets: (1) HealthAMR, a refined health-domain corpus via deduplication and re-annotation. (2) GeneralAMR, a general domain benchmark with 28K annotated sentences from 77 channels across 7 E-commerce categories. Further, we propose JointMRE, a multi-task framework that jointly resolves morphs and generates structured explanations, transferring grammatical insights from large language models to enhance generalization. Predictions are refined by our Conflict-aware Dual-output Refinement Framework (CDRF), which detects inconsistencies between corrections and explanations. Experiments show CDRF significantly improves morph resolution accuracy and interpretability. Our datasets and code are available [].

Abstract:
Self-play preference optimization has emerged as a prominent paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs). It typically involves a language model to generate on-policy responses for prompts and a reward model (RM) to guide the selection of chosen and rejected responses, which can be further trained with direct preference optimization (DPO). However, the role of prompts remains underexplored, despite being a core component in this pipeline. In this work, we investigate how prompts of varying difficulty influence self-play preference optimization. We use the mean reward of sampled responses of a prompt as a proxy for its difficulty. We first find that difficult prompts exhibit substantially inferior self-play optimization performance compared to easy prompts for language models. Moreover, incorporating difficult prompts into training fails to enhance overall performance and, in fact, leads to slight degradation compared to training on easy prompts alone. Third, there is a clear upward trend in optimization performance as prompt difficulty decreases. We also observe that the performance gap between difficult and easy prompts tends to close as the model capacity increases, suggesting that prompt difficulty interacts with the model capacity. Building on these findings, we explore strategies to mitigate the adversary effect of difficult prompts on final performance. We demonstrate that only training on a small portion (30%) of the easiest prompts improves overall self-play performance on AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard. We also report failed attempts and lessons learned.

Abstract:
AI-generated content has evolved from monolithic models to modular workflows, particularly on platforms like ComfyUI, enabling customization in creative pipelines. However, crafting effective workflows requires great expertise to orchestrate numerous specialized components, presenting a steep learning curve for users. To address this challenge, we introduce ComfyUI-R1, the first large reasoning model for automated workflow generation. Starting with our curated knowledge bases, we construct long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning data, including node selection, workflow planning, and code-level workflow representation. ComfyUI-R1 is trained through a two-stage framework: (1) CoT fine-tuning for cold start, adapting models to the ComfyUI domain; (2) reinforcement learning for incentivizing reasoning capability, guided by a fine-grained rule-metric hybrid reward, ensuring format validity, structural integrity, and node-level fidelity. Experiments show that our 7B-parameter model achieves a 97% format validity rate, along with high pass rate, node-level and graph-level F1 scores, surpassing prior state-of-the-art methods that employ leading closed-source models such as GPT-4o and Claude series. Qualitative analysis further highlights our model’s strength in synthesizing intricate workflows with diverse nodes, aligning with human instructions, and generalizing to newly introduced nodes, underscoring the potential of long CoT reasoning in AI art creation.

Abstract:
Reasoning large language models (LLMs) have recently made much progress in complex problem-solving, leveraging internal reasoning (or thought) to guide their solution generation. However, existing LLM-based counseling agents, including those using Motivational Interviewing (MI), generate responses without explicitly aligning thoughts with counseling techniques, limiting their effectiveness. We propose MIThinker, a lightweight thinking model that generates therapeutic thoughts to guide MI counseling agents in strategy selection and response generation. To overcome the lack of annotated thought data, we introduce AugR1-MI, an automated pipeline that reverse-engineers counselor’s thoughts from observed responses. Through two-stage training combining supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, MIThinker demonstrates improved theory-of-mind assessment and strategy alignment. Comprehensive evaluations show that MindfulMI, our agent leveraging MIThinker, achieves MI competency comparable to state-of-the-art systems with an order of magnitude less computation.

Abstract:
Recently, Large Language Models (LLM) have emerged as a promising paradigm for sequential recommendation. In sequential recommendation, effectively integrating diverse user preferences is essential for improving LLM performance, as users often exhibit multiple interests across different contexts. However, most existing LLM-based methods rely primarily on item descriptions or utilize user preferences independently. As a result, they overlook the relationships among preferences and fail to filter out less-relevant items that introduce noise. This makes it difficult to accurately capture the user’s interests, leading to suboptimal recommendations. To overcome these limitations, we propose UCGRec (User-Centric Graph Learning for LLM-based Sequential Recommendation), a novel method that effectively integrates diverse user-relevant preference signals into a unified user-centric graph. Then, we inject the graph-based knowledge into the LLM through end-to-end training with graph neural networks. We conduct extensive experiments on four widely used sequential real-world recommendation datasets. Our experimental results demonstrate that UCGRec significantly outperforms conventional and state-of-the-art LLM-based methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in Knowledge Base Question Answering (KBQA) via semantic parsing. However, existing retrieval-augmented approaches typically retrieve entities and relations in isolation based solely on semantic similarity, ignoring the structural information of the Knowledge Base (KB) and the question. To address this limitation, we propose SELF-KBQA ( S ubgraph-Guided E xecutable L ogical F orm Generation), a novel framework that empowers LLMs to generate logical forms conditioned on structurally aligned and semantically relevant subgraphs. Specifically, we introduce a structure-aware subgraph retrieval stage that ranks candidate subgraphs by aligning them with the question’s structure, along with semantic relevance. Subsequently, we employ a token-budgeted evidence condensation strategy to distill the top-ranked subgraphs into compact contexts for the generation stage. Extensive experiments on GrailQA, WebQSP, and GraphQuestions demonstrate that SELF-KBQA achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
With the rapid growth of scientific publications, researchers struggle to efficiently assess the relevance of numerous papers. Identifying the types of contributions an article makes can help readers quickly grasp its significance. The ACL Rolling Review (ARR) introduced a typology requiring authors to specify their contributions to improve review quality and fairness. However, the current typology lacks clear definitions and guidance, leading to inconsistent labeling and raising concerns about its reliability.Our re-annotation campaign reveals substantial disagreement between authors and domain experts. Moreover, the predictions of large language models (LLMs), when compared with expert annotations, tend to be close to those provided by the authors. These findings suggest a potential path toward better annotation reliability within the ARR process.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) rely on both contextual knowledge and parametric memory, yet these sources can conflict. Prior analysis largely focused on contextual question answering, suggesting that models tend to favor parametric knowledge under conflict, but this setting assumes that tasks should always rely on the provided passage. It therefore remains unclear how LLMs behave when tasks demand different kinds and degrees of knowledge utilization . We address this gap with a model-agnostic diagnostic framework that holds underlying knowledge constant while injecting controlled conflicts across tasks with varying knowledge requirements. Evaluating representative open-source LLMs, we find that: (1) performance degradation under conflict correlates with a task’s knowledge reliance rather than conflict plausibility alone; (2) strategies such as explanatory rationales or reiteration increase context reliance, helping context-only tasks but harming those that require parametric knowledge; and (3) these behaviors bias model-based evaluation, raising concerns about the reliability of LLMs as judges. Together, our findings show that context–memory conflict is fundamentally task-dependent and motivate task-aware approaches to balancing context and memory in LLM deployment and evaluation.

Abstract:
Recent reinforcement learning (RL) approaches, such as outcome-supervised GRPO, have advanced reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs), yet their adaptation to multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) remains underexplored. Progress has been further limited by the lack of evaluation settings that jointly test perception and reasoning under controlled generalization challenges. To enable such analysis, we present SEED-Bench-R1, a structured testbed featuring real-world video tasks and hierarchical evaluation across in-distribution, cross-environment, and cross-environment-task scenarios. Our analysis reveals that standard outcome-supervised GRPO often yields "logical incoherence"—achieving correct answers through flawed reasoning—due to its exclusive focus on final-answer rewards and rigid KL penalties. To address this, we propose GRPO-CARE, a consistency-aware RL framework that eliminates KL penalties while introducing a two-tiered reward system: a base reward for accuracy and an adaptive bonus for consistency. This bonus, derived from a slowly evolving reference model through group-relative likelihood calibration, rewards reasoning paths that logically support the final answer without requiring expensive process supervision. Experiments on SEED-Bench-R1 show that GRPO-CARE consistently outperforms standard GRPO, achieving a 6.7% gain on the hardest evaluation level and a 24.5% increase in reasoning consistency. Moreover, models trained with GRPO-CARE transfer effectively to diverse video understanding and even language-only reasoning benchmarks, validating its robustness and generality.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that circumvent safety constraints. Existing strategies, ranging from heuristic prompt engineering to computationally intensive optimization, often face significant trade-offs between effectiveness and efficiency. In this work, we propose Contextual Representation Ablation (CRA), a novel inference-time intervention framework designed to dynamically silence model guardrails. Predicated on the geometric insight that refusal behaviors are mediated by specific low-rank subspaces within the model’s hidden states, CRA identifies and suppresses these refusal-inducing activation patterns during decoding without requiring expensive parameter updates or training. Empirical evaluation across multiple safety-aligned open-source LLMs demonstrates that CRA significantly outperforms baselines. By revealing that safety constraints can be surgically ablated from internal representations, our findings expose the intrinsic fragility of current alignment mechanisms and underscore the urgent need for more robust latent-space defenses.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have exhibited strong reasoning capabilities through chain-of-thought mechanisms that generate step-by-step rationales. However, such slow-thinking approaches often lead to overthinking, where models produce excessively verbose responses even for simple queries, resulting in test-time inefficiency and even degraded accuracy. Prior work has attempted to mitigate this issue via adaptive reasoning strategies, but these methods largely overlook a fundamental bottleneck: visual perception failures. We argue that stable reasoning critically depends on low-level visual grounding, and that reasoning errors often originate from imperfect perception rather than insufficient deliberation. To address this limitation, we propose Gated Perception-Reasoning Optimization (GPRO), a meta-reasoning controller that dynamically routes computation among three decision paths at each generation step: a lightweight fast path, a slow perception path for re-examining visual inputs, and a slow reasoning path for internal self-reflection. To learn this distinction, we derive large-scale failure attribution supervision from approximately 790k samples, using teacher models to distinguish perceptual hallucinations from reasoning errors. We then train the controller with multi-objective reinforcement learning to optimize the trade-off between task accuracy and computational cost under uncertainty. Experiments on five benchmarks demonstrate that GPRO substantially improves both accuracy and efficiency, outperforming recent slow-thinking methods while generating significantly shorter responses.

Abstract:
Opinion summarization systems aggregate customer sentiments without capturing the emotional factors that drive purchasing decisions, resulting in shallow summaries that overlook the affective dimensions shaping customer experiences and fail to explain why customers feel the way they do. This gap exists because prior research has neglected the interplay between expressed opinions and their underlying emotional contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce Emotion-Aware Opinion Summarization (EAOS), a framework leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate emotional dimensions into opinion summaries, moving beyond conventional sentiment polarity. To support this task, we develop a large-scale (40K product–summary pairs) training dataset, an evaluation benchmark, a compact 1B-parameter model that matches 70B-scale performance via knowledge distillation, and methods for generating and evaluating emotion-aware summaries. A user study shows that 82% of readers prefer our emotion-aware summaries ( p < .001 ), confirming that adding emotion helps in making purchase decisions.

Abstract:
Recent work on domain-specific reasoning with large language models (LLMs) has largely relied on training-intensive approaches that require updating model parameters. Although activation steering has emerged as a parameter-efficient alternative, existing methods typically rely on static and manually designed interventions, limiting their ability to adapt to the dynamic nature of complex reasoning. To address this limitation, we propose RISER (Router-based Intervention for Steerable Enhancement of Reasoning), a plug-and-play intervention framework that adaptively steers LLM reasoning in activation space. RISER builds a library of reusable reasoning vectors and employs a lightweight Router to dynamically compose these vectors for each input. The Router is optimized via reinforcement learning under task-level rewards, enabling the emergent and compositional activation of latent cognitive primitives. Across seven diverse benchmarks, RISER achieves average zero-shot accuracy improvements of 3.4–6.5% over the base model, while outperforming chain-of-thought-style reasoning with 2–3× higher token efficiency and robust accuracy gains. Further analysis demonstrates that RISER autonomously combines multiple vectors into interpretable and precise control strategies, pointing toward more controllable and efficient LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Vision–language models (VLMs) can achieve high accuracy while still accepting culturally plausible but visually incorrect interpretations. Existing hallucination benchmarks rarely test this failure mode, particularly outside Western contexts and English. We introduce M 2 CQA, a culturally grounded multimodal benchmark built from images spanning 17 MENA countries, paired with contrastive true and counterfactual statements in English, Arabic, and its dialects. To isolate hallucination beyond raw accuracy, we propose the CounterFactual Hallucination Rate (CFHR), which measures counterfactual acceptance conditioned on correctly answering the true statement. Evaluating state-of-the-art VLMs under multiple prompting strategies, we find that CFHR rises sharply in Arabic, especially in dialects, even when true-statement accuracy remains high.Moreover, reasoning-first prompting consistently increases counterfactual hallucination, while answering before justifying improves robustness. We make the dataset publicly available for the community (https://huggingface.co/datasets/QCRI/M2CQA)).

Abstract:
Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) in real-world scenarios is often challenged by dynamically missing modalities. Existing methods predominantly rely on deterministic imputation and rigid alignment, which compels the model to overfit noise in ambiguous regions while neglecting the decision shift induced by modality inertia. To address these issues, we propose a novel uncertainty-calibrated elastic alignment framework, termed EASE. Specifically, we employ probabilistic imputation to capture cross-modal ambiguity and leverage the estimated uncertainty to drive elastic alignment, thereby adaptively relaxing constraints in ambiguous regions to avoid rigid fitting. Meanwhile, we introduce cross-view predictive consistency constraints to unify discriminative logic across different modality views, stabilizing the decision boundary under modality degradation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EASE consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art baselines across multiple benchmarks, exhibiting exceptional robustness particularly under high missing-rate scenarios.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is widely used for parameter-efficient fine-tuning, yet merging multiple task-specific LoRA updates without additional training remains challenging. Most existing LoRA merging methods rely on SVD-based alignment, which emphasizes globally shared structure across tasks. In this work, we show that LoRA merging performance can be further improved by combining SVD with CUR decomposition. Through a representation-level analysis, we find that SVD-based decompositions primarily model shared components across tasks, while CUR-based decompositions better preserve task-specific and localized updates. These two perspectives are geometrically misaligned and exhibit complementary advantages, revealing an inherent trade-off between capturing shared structure and preserving task-specific information in LoRA model merging. Guided by this analysis, we propose a training-free merging procedure that explicitly combines the shared structure captured by SVD with the task-specific components preserved by CUR. Experiments on both vision and language benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing gradient-free LoRA merging methods.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) excel in complex reasoning tasks, they suffer from severe causal hallucination in event causality identification (ECI), particularly in smaller models ( ≤ 1.5B parameters). A promising approach to address this issue is to fine-tune them with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces. However, there is currently a lack of CoT trace dataset available for ECI. In this paper, we first investigate the essential criteria that effective CoT traces should possess to mitigate causal hallucination in smaller models. We then design a pipeline to generate CoT traces that meet these criteria. Moreover, since there is currently no metric for quantifying causal hallucination, we also introduce a new metric, the Causal Hallucination Rate (CHR), to quantify causal hallucination, guide the formulation of effective CoT trace criteria, and validate the effectiveness of our pipeline. Our experiments show that fine-tuning with the CoT traces generated by our pipeline not only substantially reduces causal hallucination in smaller LLMs but also improves mean accuracy. Moreover, the fine-tuned models exhibit strong cross-dataset and cross-difficulty generalization, as well as robustness under intentionally misleading intervention prompts.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed worldwide, yet they exhibit strong Western-centric biases, and the internal mechanisms governing their cultural behaviors remain poorly understood. Prior work has identified so-called cultural neurons, but individual neurons are often polysemous, conflating abstract cultural knowledge with surface-level lexical cues due to superposition. We apply Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to decompose intermediate LLM activations into sparse, interpretable feature representations that disentangle these factors. This analysis reveals culturally selective features that remain invariant across paraphrasing and task formats, indicating abstraction beyond lexical correlations. Through targeted feature ablation, we provide causal evidence that these features are necessary for cultural reasoning: their removal selectively degrades performance on culturally conditioned tasks. Furthermore, we show that steering model activations along these feature directions is sufficient to systematically modulate cultural-related knowledge generation, without retraining. Together, our results offer the first causal evidence that LLMs encode cultural knowledge as decoupled semantic structures rather than surface patterns, enabling a scalable pathway toward cultural alignment through mechanistic intervention. Code is available at https://github.com/IAN-YE/Cultural-features-SAE.

Abstract:
Role-playing prompts effectively steer Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the neural mechanism driving this behavioral shift remains unclear. In this work, we identify Role-Sensitive Neurons (RSNs)—a sparse sub-network (≈ 0.5% of all neurons) governing the transition from hesitation to action. Using a novel evaluation framework with explicit abstention (MMLU-E), we reveal a Confidence-Performance Decoupling: roles primarily modulate the model’s probabilistic "willingness to act" rather than its underlying knowledge representation. We demonstrate that RSNs function as a mechanistic gain control system: causal intervention on this subspace allows precise regulation of abstention behavior. Furthermore, cross-model transfer experiments confirm that these circuits are indigenous to pre-training, with Instruction Tuning (SFT) acting merely as a "signal sharpener" to refine latent gain dynamics. Finally, we identify a critical safety boundary: in knowledge-deficient models, amplifying RSNs induces "unwarranted certainty," highlighting decisiveness as a tunable gain parameter distinct from epistemic truth.

Abstract:
Entity alignment (EA) aims to identify entities referring to the same real-world object across different knowledge graphs (KGs). Recent approaches based on large language models (LLMs) typically obtain entity embeddings through knowledge representation learning and use embedding similarity to identify an alignment-uncertain entity set. For each uncertain entity, a candidate entity set (CES) is then retrieved based on embedding similarity to support subsequent alignment reasoning and decision making. However, the reliability of the CES and the reasoning capability of LLMs critically affect the effectiveness of subsequent alignment decisions. To address this issue, we propose AgentEA, a reliable EA framework based on multi-agent debate. AgentEA first improves embedding quality through entity representation preference optimization, and then introduces a two-stage multi-role debate mechanism consisting of lightweight debate verification and deep debate alignment to progressively enhance the reliability of alignment decisions while enabling more efficient debate-based reasoning. Extensive experiments on public benchmarks under cross-lingual, sparse, large-scale, and heterogeneous settings demonstrate the effectiveness of AgentEA.

Abstract:
Person Re-Identification (ReID) has long struggled with the semantic gap between low-level visual features and high-level identity concepts. While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer promising semantic understanding, existing methods typically adopt a static "one-pass" paradigm, converting images to text once for retrieval. This approach suffers from two critical flaws: Information Bottleneck, where converting rich visuals into text causes detail loss, and Open-Loop Failure, where initial hallucinations propagate without recourse. To address this, we propose Auto-ReID, a novel framework that reformulates ReID as an iterative "Think-and-Refine" process. We first introduce a Hierarchical Progressive Tuning strategy to transform a generic VLM into a specialized Re-ID expert. During inference, we deploy a closed-loop architecture comprising a Reasoner for structured attribute extraction, a Hybrid Retriever that anchors dynamic semantic queries with stable visual features to prevent drift, and a Corrector that deconstructs and verifies candidates to iteratively optimize the search. Extensive experiments on ReID datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, particularly in complex occlusion scenarios.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation enhances language models by retrieving external knowledge to support informed and grounded responses. However, traditional RAG methods rely on fragment-level retrieval, limiting their ability to address query-focused summarization queries. GraphRAG introduces a graph-based paradigm for global knowledge reasoning, yet suffers from inefficiencies in information extraction, costly resource consumption, and poor adaptability to incremental updates. To overcome these limitations, we propose TagRAG, a tag-guided hierarchical knowledge graph RAG framework designed for efficient global reasoning and scalable graph maintenance. TagRAG introduces two key components: (1) Tag Knowledge Graph Construction, which extracts object tags and their relationships from documents and organizes them into hierarchical domain tag chains for structured knowledge representation, and (2) Tag-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation, which retrieves domain-centric tag chains to localize and synthesize relevant knowledge during inference. This design significantly adapts to smaller language models, improves retrieval granularity, and supports efficient knowledge increment. Extensive experiments on UltraDomain datasets spanning Agriculture, Computer Science, Law, and cross-domain settings demonstrate that TagRAG achieves an average win rate of 78.36% against baselines while maintaining about 14.6x construction and 1.9x retrieval efficiency compared with GraphRAG.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet aligning such abilities to small language models (SLMs) remains a challenge due to distributional mismatches and limited model capacity. Existing reasoning datasets, typically designed for powerful LLMs, often lead to degraded performance when directly applied to weaker models. In this work, we introduce Dynamic Adaptation of Reasoning Trajectories (DART), a novel data adaptation framework that bridges the capability gap between expert reasoning trajectories and diverse SLMs. Instead of uniformly imitating expert steps, DART employs a selective imitation strategy guided by step-wise adaptability estimation via solution simulation. When expert steps surpass the student’s capacity—signaled by an Imitation Gap—the student autonomously explores alternative reasoning paths, constrained by outcome consistency. We validate DART across multiple reasoning benchmarks and model scales, demonstrating that it significantly improves generalization and data efficiency over static fine-tuning. Our method enhances supervision quality by aligning training signals with the student’s reasoning capabilities, offering a scalable solution for reasoning alignment in resource-constrained models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are excellent at maintaining high-level, convincing dialogue, but it remains unclear whether their persuasive success reflects genuine understanding of the discourse. We examine this question through informal debates between humans and LLMs, first by measuring their persuasive skills, and then by relating these to their understanding of what is being talked about: namely, their comprehension of argumentative structures and the pragmatic context on the same debates. We find that LLMs effectively maintain coherent, persuasive debates, and can sway the beliefs of both participants and audiences. We also note that awareness or suspicion of AI involvement encourage people to be more critical of the arguments made. However, we also find that LLMs are unable to show comprehension of deeper dialogical structures, such as argument quality or existence of supporting premises. Our results reveal a disconnect between LLM comprehension and dialogical skills, raising ethical and practical concerns on their deployment on explanation-critical contexts. From an argumentation-theoretical perspective, we experimentally question whether an agent, if it can convincingly maintain a dialogue, is required to show it knows what is talking about.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) enhanced with knowledge retrieval, an approach known as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), have achieved strong performance in open-domain question answering. However, RAG remains prone to hallucinations: factually incorrect outputs may arise from inaccuracies in the model’s internal knowledge and the retrieved context. Existing approaches to mitigating hallucinations often conflate factuality with faithfulness to the retrieved evidence, incorrectly labeling factually correct statements as hallucinations if they are not explicitly supported by the retrieval. In this paper, we introduce FRANQ (Faithfulness-aware Retrieval-Augmented UNcertainty Quantification), a new method for hallucination detection in RAG outputs. FRANQ applies distinct uncertainty quantification techniques to estimate factuality, conditioning on whether a statement is faithful to the retrieved context. To evaluate FRANQ and competing uncertainty quantification methods, we construct a new long-form question answering dataset annotated for both factuality and faithfulness, combining automated labeling with manual validation of challenging cases. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, tasks, and LLMs show that FRANQ achieves more accurate detection of factual errors in RAG-generated responses compared to existing uncertainty quantification and hallucination detection approaches.

Abstract:
Text-to-Video (T2V) generation has benefited from recent advances in diffusion models, yet current systems still struggle under complex scenarios, which are generally exacerbated by the ambiguity and underspecification of text prompts. In this work, we formulate complex-scenario prompt refinement as a stage-wise multi-agent refinement process and propose SCMAPR, i.e., a scenario-aware and Self-Correcting Multi-Agent Prompt Refinement framework for T2V prompting. SCMAPR coordinates specialized agents to (i) route each prompt to a taxonomy-grounded scenario for strategy selection, (ii) synthesize scenario-aware rewriting policies and perform policy-conditioned refinement, and (iii) conduct structured semantic verification that triggers conditional revision when violations are detected. To clarify what constitutes complex scenarios in T2V prompting, provide representative examples, and enable rigorous evaluation under such challenging conditions, we further introduce T2V-Complexity, which is a complex-scenario T2V benchmark consisting exclusively of complex-scenario prompts. Extensive experiments on 3 existing benchmarks and our T2V-Complexity benchmark demonstrate that SCMAPR consistently improves text-video alignment and overall generation quality under complex scenarios, achieving up to 2.67% and 3.28 gains in average score on VBench and EvalCrafter, and up to 0.028 improvement on T2V-CompBench over 3 State-Of-The-Art baselines. The codes of SCMAPR are publicly available at https://github.com/HiThink-Research/SCMAPR.

Abstract:
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) models typically suffer significant performance degradation under domain shifts. While Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) aims to mitigate this, existing discriminative approaches often succumb to “confident but wrong” predictions on out-of-distribution samples. Conversely, generative models offer robust calibration but incur prohibitive computational costs. To bridge this gap, we propose GD-Adapt (Generative-Discriminative Adaptation), a novel TTA framework that harmonizes the robustness of generative diffusion models with the efficiency of discriminative regression networks via Bayesian Diffusion Distillation (BDD). Specifically, we introduce Auxiliary Generative Regularization (AGR) during pretraining to enforce manifold-aware feature learning. Extensive experiments across five cross-domain scenarios demonstrate our method’s superiority. For instance, on the challenging MOSI to SIMS shift, GD-Adapt reduces Mean Absolute Error (MAE) from 0.6872 to 0.5673 and boosts binary accuracy by 5.81 percentage points (reaching 57.33%). Notably, in scenarios such as SIMS to MOSI, we achieve an 11.18-point gain over the non-adapted baseline.

Abstract:
Prior works have shown that fine-tuning on new knowledge can induce factual hallucinations in large language models (LLMs), leading to incorrect outputs when evaluated on previously known information. However, the specific manifestations of such hallucination and its underlying mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. Our work addresses this gap by designing a controlled dataset Biography-Reasoning, and conducting a fine-grained analysis across multiple knowledge types and two task types, including knowledge question answering (QA) and knowledge reasoning tasks. We find that hallucinations not only severely affect tasks involving newly introduced knowledge, but also propagate to other evaluation tasks. Moreover, when fine-tuning on a dataset in which a specific knowledge type consists entirely of new knowledge, LLMs exhibit elevated hallucination tendencies. This suggests that the degree of unfamiliarity within a particular knowledge type, rather than the overall proportion of new knowledge, is a stronger driver of hallucinations. Through interpretability analysis, we show that learning new knowledge weakens the model’s attention to key entities in the input question, leading to an over-reliance on surrounding context and a higher risk of hallucination. Conversely, reintroducing a small amount of known knowledge during the later stages of training restores attention to key entities and substantially mitigates hallucination behavior. Finally, we demonstrate that disrupted attention patterns can propagate across lexically similar contexts, facilitating the spread of hallucinations beyond the original task.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in human-centric applications, yet they often fail to provide substantive emotional support. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been utilized to enhance empathy of LLMs, existing reward models typically evaluate empathy from a single perspective, overlooking the inherently bidirectional interaction nature of empathy between the supporter and seeker as defined by Empathy Cycle theory. To address this limitation, we propose Psychology-grounded Empathetic Reward Modeling (PERM). PERM operationalizes empathy evaluation through a bidirectional decomposition: 1) Supporter perspective, assessing internal resonation and communicative expression; 2) Seeker perspective, evaluating emotional reception. Additionally, it incorporates a bystander perspective to monitor overall interaction quality. Extensive experiments on a widely-used emotional intelligence benchmark and an industrial daily conversation dataset demonstrate that PERM outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by over 10%. Furthermore, a blinded user study reveals a 70% preference for our approach, highlighting its efficacy in generating more empathetic responses.

Abstract:
Reasoning capabilities have significantly improved the performance of vision-language models (VLMs) in domains such as mathematical problem-solving, coding, and visual question-answering. However, their impact on real-world applications remains unclear. This paper presents a large-scale empirical study on the effectiveness of reasoning-enabled VLMs in mobile GUI agents. We evaluate six pairs of VLMs, including both commercial and open-source lightweight models, by comparing their base and reasoning-enhanced versions across static and interactive benchmarks. Our findings show that reasoning-enabled VLMs generally provide only marginal improvements over their non-reasoning counterparts and can even degrade performance in certain agent configurations. Notably, reasoning and non-reasoning VLMs fail on different sets of tasks, suggesting that reasoning does have an impact, but its benefits and drawbacks counterbalance each other. We attribute these inconsistencies to the limitations of benchmarks and VLMs. Based on the findings, we provide insights for further enhancing mobile GUI agents in terms of benchmarks, VLMs, and their adaptability in dynamically invoking reasoning VLMs.

Abstract:
Since real-world legal experiments are often costly or infeasible, simulating legal societies with Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems provides an effective alternative for testing and advancing legal theory, as well as supporting legal administration. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their world knowledge and role-playing capabilities, are strong candidates to serve as the foundation for legal society simulation. However, the application of LLMs to simulate legal systems remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce Law in Silico, a unified LLM-based agent framework for simulating legal scenarios that incorporate individual decision-making and institutional mechanisms, such as legislation, adjudication, and enforcement. We calibrate agent behaviors against real-world crime data, demonstrating that LLM-based agents can capture realistic sociological correlations. Building on this foundation, we structure our simulation through a ”Micro-to-Macro” process: we conduct micro-level simulations in representative conflict-driven scenarios, allowing legal rules to evolve through agent-institution interactions naturally. These evolved laws are then deployed back into macro-scale populations to evaluate their effectiveness in regulating behaviors. Through comprehensive experiments, our results reveal that a well-functioning, transparent, and adaptive legal system can mitigate "cat-and-mouse" regulatory dynamics and offer better protection for vulnerable individuals.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external knowledge to mitigate hallucinations, yet retrieving precise multi-hop evidence for knowledge-augmented reasoning remains difficult. Existing Knowledge Graph (KG)-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems insufficiently model the interaction between query semantics and relation types, resulting in imprecise subgraph retrieval and unstable reasoning. We propose Query-aware Subgraph Retrieval Augmented Generation (QSRAG), a retrieval framework built upon a Query-Relational Graph Attention Network (QR-GAT) that integrates query semantics and relation embeddings directly into the attention mechanism, enabling fine-grained triple scoring and scalable subgraph construction. This query–relation conditioning improves relevance estimation and suppresses noisy edges, producing faithful reasoning subgraphs. Experiments on WebQSP and CWQ establish new state-of-the-art results in both Triple Recall and Answer Recall, and significantly enhance LLMs reasoning accuracy without fine-tuning. These findings underscore the effectiveness of modeling query–relation interactions for reliable knowledge-augmented reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are challenged by generating hallucinations and factually incorrect responses, particularly in complex and specialized medical question answering (QA). Integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods has emerged as a promising direction. However, existing graph-based RAG methods heuristically retrieve and refine question-relevant subgraphs, potentially introducing redundant and noisy factual information that is difficult for LLMs to process, ultimately limiting reasoning capability. To incorporate a concise yet informative evidence subgraph, we propose an iterative medical QA framework. It optimizes graph-based RAG methods by selectively retrieving focused knowledge from KGs to construct a precise evidence subgraph and progressively pruning it utilizing structured feature representations. The targeted KG integration maintains coherent and reliable inference. Experiments on three medical QA benchmark datasets demonstrate that the framework achieves state-of-the-art performance against representative baseline competitors, highlighting the importance of efficient KG integration.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly deployed in multi-turn settings such as tutoring, support, and counseling, where reliability depends on preserving consistent roles, personas, and goals across long horizons. This requirement becomes critical when LLMs are used to generate synthetic dialogues for training and evaluation, since LLM–LLM conversations can accumulate identity-related failures such as persona drift, role confusion, and “echoing”, where one agent gradually mirrors its partner. We introduce SPASM (Stable Persona-driven Agent Simulation for Multi-turn dialogue generation), a modular, stability-first framework that decomposes simulation into (i) persona creation via schema sampling, plausibility validation, and natural-language persona crafting, (ii) Client–Responder dialogue generation, and (iii) termination detection for coherent stopping. To improve long-horizon stability without changing model weights, we propose Egocentric Context Projection (ECP): dialogue history is stored in a perspective-agnostic representation and deterministically projected into each agent’s egocentric view before generation. Across three LLM backbones (GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-V3.2, Qwen-Plus) and nine Client–Responder pairings, we construct a dataset of 4,500 personas and 45,000 conversations (500 personas × 10 conversations per pairing). Ablations show ECP substantially reduces persona drift and, under human validation, eliminates echoing; embedding analyses recover persona structure and reveal strong responder-driven interaction geometry. Our code is available at https://github.com/lhannnn/SPASM.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic Western-centric bias, yet whether prompting in non-Western languages (e.g., Chinese) can mitigate this remains understudied. Answering this question requires rigorous evaluation and effective mitigation, but existing approaches fall short on both fronts: evaluation methods force outputs into predefined cultural categories without a neutral option, while mitigation relies on expensive multi-cultural corpora or agent frameworks that use functional roles (e.g., Planner–Critique) lacking explicit cultural representation. To address these gaps, we introduce CEBiasBench, a Chinese–English bilingual benchmark, and Multi-Agent Vote (MAV), which enables explicit "no bias” judgments. Using this framework, we find that Chinese prompting merely shifts bias toward East Asian perspectives rather than eliminating it. To mitigate such persistent bias, we propose Multi-Agent Cultural Debate (MACD), a training-free framework that assigns agents distinct cultural personas and orchestrates deliberation via a "Seeking Common Ground while Reserving Differences” strategy. Experiments demonstrate that MACD achieves 57.6% average No Bias Rate evaluated by LLM-as-judge and 86.0% evaluated by MAV (vs. 47.6% and 69.0% baseline using GPT-4o as backbone) on CEBiasBench and generalizes to the Arabic CAMeL benchmark, confirming that explicit cultural representation in agent frameworks is essential for cross-cultural fairness.

Abstract:
Do frontier LLMs reason causally, or do they pattern-match, yielding under pressure and hedging under uncertainty? We frame causal judgment as evaluation along three axes, Utility, Safety, and Wise Refusal, across Pearl’s Ladder. We introduce Recursive Causal Audit (RCA), a process-integrity evaluator whose Judge has no access to gold labels: it checks whether a model’s answer is entailed by itsown derivation, internally consistent, and not dominated by user hints under pressure. RCA unifies persona and pressure: prompt tone is the intervention that regulates pressure-induced drift. For fine diagnostic resolution we use CAUSALT3, with explicit trap families and standardized pressure protocols. CAUSALT3 reveals a Skepticism Trap (Claude Haiku rejects 60% of valid L1 links) and a Scaling Paradox (GPT-5.2 underperforms GPT-4-Turbo by 55 points on L3, driven by paralysis rather than hallucination). Under RCA, operating points shift toward the high-Utility, high-Safety quadrant without retraining, consistent with much of the observed failure arising from how answers are rendered under pressure rather than from missing causal knowledge.

Abstract:
Maintaining a stable persona is central to sustained spoken role-playing, yet when an agent breaks character, current evaluations often do not isolate which component caused the failure, making fixes slow and ad hoc.We propose PED (Persona-Emotion Decoupling), a diagnostic evaluation framework that decomposes persona expression into two observable routes: what the agent says (text) and how it sounds (speech).PED operationalizes the affective slice of persona expression by projecting transcripts and audio into a shared affective measurement space for route-comparable, reference-based analyses of separability, drift, failures, and coupling.We demonstrate PED via two worked instantiations spanning an end-to-end Speech LLM and a cascaded LLM+TTS pipeline under a fixed dialogue protocol.Within this setting, PED surfaces four recurring diagnostic signatures:(i) route-level separability is bounded by reference overlap and can differ sharply across architectures,(ii) text-route drift is stress-linked and tends toward a neutral-heavy region,(iii) text-audio consistency is weakly coupled, yielding route-asymmetric failures,and (iv) audio-route structure can be materially shaped by an explicit intermediate style cue in cascaded pipelines.Overall, PED reframes holistic "voice+character" grading as turn-level, fault-localizing signals for faster debugging and iteration.

Abstract:
Audio deepfakes pose a significant security threat, yet current state-of-the-art (SOTA) detection systems do not generalize well to realistic in-the-wild deepfakes. We introduce a novel In-Context Learning paradigm with comparison-guidance for Audio Deepfake detection (ICLAD). The framework enables the use of audio language models (ALMs) for training-free generalization to unseen deepfakes and provides rich textual explanations on the detection outcome. At the core of ICLAD is a pairwise comparative reasoning strategy that guides the ALM to discover and filter hallucinations and deepfake-irrelevant acoustic attributes. The ALM works alongside a specialized deepfake detector, whereby a routing mechanism feeds out-of-distribution samples to the ALM. On in-the-wild datasets, ICLAD improves macro F1 over the specialized detector, with up to 2× relative improvement. Further analysis demonstrates the flexibility of ICLAD and its potential for deployment on recent open-source ALMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising way to simulate human survey responses, potentially reducing the cost of large-scale data collection. However, existing zero-shot methods suffer from prompt sensitivity and low accuracy, while conventional fine-tuning approaches mostly fit the training set distributions and struggle to produce results more accurate than the training set itself, which deviates from the original goal of using LLMs to simulate survey responses. Building on this observation, we introduce Distribution Shift Alignment (DSA), a two-stage fine-tuning method that aligns both the output distributions and the distribution shifts across different backgrounds. By learning how these distributions change rather than fitting training data, DSA can provide results substantially closer to the true distribution than the training data. Empirically, DSA consistently outperforms other methods on five public survey datasets. We further conduct a comprehensive comparison covering accuracy, robustness, and data savings. DSA reduces the required real data by 53.48-69.12%, demonstrating its effectiveness and efficiency in survey simulation.

Abstract:
While LLM watermarking is essential for machine- generated content identification, existing paraphrase-based attacks struggle to balance watermark removal efficacy with text quality. We propose TSAPA, a training-free evolutionary framework that models watermark removal as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem. By leveraging genetic algorithms to navigate the Pareto front, TSAPA utilizes a Pseudo-Log-Likelihood (PLL)-guided mutation to precisely target and modify watermark-carrying tokens. Experiments on Qwen3 series (1.7B/8B/32B) across multiple watermark schemes show that TSAPA achieves over 90% attack success rate (ASR) while maintaining high text semantic fidelity, significantly outperforming baselines methods. This work exposes critical vulnerabilities in current watermarks and provides a new perspective for robust evaluation.

Abstract:
One paradigm of language model (LM) fine-tuning relies on creating large training datasets, under the assumption that high quantity and diversity will enable models to generalize to novel tasks after post-training. In practice, gathering large sets of data is inefficient, and training on them is prohibitively expensive; worse, there is no guarantee that the resulting model will handle complex scenarios or generalize better. Moreover, existing techniques rarely assess whether a training sample provides novel information, resulting in unnecessary costs. In this work, we explore a new Test-Time Self-Improvement (TT-SI) algorithm to create more effective and generalizable agentic LMs on-the-fly. TT-SI can be summarized in three steps: (i) first it identifies the samples that model struggles with (self-awareness), (ii) then generates similar examples from detected uncertain samples (self-data augmentation), and (iii) uses these newly generated samples at test-time training (self-improvement). We further explore Test-Time Distillation (TT-D), which leverages a stronger supervisor for targeted data generation. Empirical evaluations across different agent benchmarks demonstrate that TT-SI improves the performance with +5.48% absolute accuracy gain on average across all benchmarks and surpasses other standard learning methods more efficiently. Our findings highlight the promise of TT-SI, demonstrating the potential of self-improvement algorithms at test-time as a new paradigm for building more capable agents toward self-evolution.

Abstract:
Multilingual speech foundation models such as Whisper are trained on web-scale data, where data for each language consists of a myriad of regional varieties. However, different regional varieties often employ different scripts to write the same language, rendering speech recognition output also subject to non-determinism in the output script. To mitigate this problem, we show that script is linearly encoded in the activation space of multilingual speech models, and that modifying activations at inference time enables direct control over output script. We find the addition of such script vectors to activations at test time can induce script change even in unconventional language-script pairings (e.g. Italian in Cyrillic and Japanese in Latin script). We apply this approach to inducing post-hoc control over the script of speech recognition output, where we observe competitive performance across all model sizes of Whisper.

Abstract:
Traditional automatic evaluation methods have been shown to be unsuitable for modern Chinese poetry because of the distinct nature of this literary genre. Human evaluation remains reliable, but is expensive and not applicable to large-scale data. In this paper, we propose Poller (Poetry LLM Evaluator), a novel method leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to evaluate the poetry understanding task. Specifically, our method requires LLMs to play the role of a poem’s author with detailed information, thereby emulating human evaluation and judgment by adopting the poet’s perspective. We conducted comprehensive experiments on multiple LLMs, evaluating the interpretations of poems across eight specialized dimensions. Experimental results demonstrate that our method effectively reduces the evaluation error between LLMs and humans. Especially for specific dimension evaluation, Poller-based LLMs achieve a 94.55% and 89.53% error reduction for rhetorical techniques and defamiliarization, respectively, compared to baseline methods. These performances are unattainable by conventional LLM evaluation methods. Experimental results from multiple LLMs across various dimensions validate the efficacy of our method. This work bridges the gap between automated efficiency and human expertise, establishing a foundation for automated evaluation in poetry-related tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning when guided by chain-of-thought exemplars, yet collecting large, high-quality reasoning datasets remains laborious and resource-intensive. We introduce Prompting Test-Time Scaling (P-TTS), a prompt-space data augmentation framework for enhancing LLM reasoning via fine-tuning. In P-TTS, scaling refers to systematic expansion of the prompt space during offline teacher-data generation, not to increased inference-time compute for the deployed student. Rather than collecting thousands of examples, P-TTS starts from a small pool of 90 manually selected reasoning instances and applies principled instruction templates and paraphrased prompt variants to elicit diverse reasoning trajectories from a teacher model, producing a compact synthetic training set. We fine-tune Qwen-2.5 models of multiple sizes on the resulting data. On reasoning benchmarks including AIME25, MATH500, and GPQA-Diamond, P-TTS consistently improves accuracy over competitive small-data baselines such as S1 and S1.1 (1K-shot), with the largest gains on AIME25 while remaining strong on MATH500 and GPQA-Diamond. P-TTS also improves generalization on out-of-domain reasoning evaluations. Ablations show that exemplar diversity and prompt-space scaling are critical drivers of improvement, suggesting that prompt scaling explores the latent space of reasoning patterns, amplifying LLM problem-solving with minimal annotation overhead. P-TTS offers a practical, low-cost way to elicit strong LLM reasoning in resource-constrained or rapidly evolving domains. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/VILA-Lab/PTTS.

Abstract:
Preprocessing-based methods for stereotype mitigation, such as pre-/post-training on debiased corpora, are widely used in NLP. While these approaches reduce measurable stereotypes for targeted groups, we find they often induce unintended shifts: stereotyping or counter-stereotyping can increase for other demographics, including across unrelated categories. We demonstrate these side effects across two model families (encoder-only and decoder-only), multiple preprocessing strategies (removing stereotypical sentences, removing group mentions, and swapping references), and both pre- and post-training at different data scales on Wikipedia. Standard benchmarks frequently miss these shifts. Using attention-rollout analysis, we observe that such side effects are not accompanied by large changes in attention flow, complicating mechanistic explanations. We discuss implications for evaluation, provide actionable diagnostics, and argue for side-effect-aware, transparent mitigation practices that make claims calibrated to uncertainty.

Abstract:
In this paper we provide evidence that our virtual model of U.S. congresspersons based on a collection of language models moves towards satisfying the definition of a digital twin. In particular, we introduce and provide high-level descriptions of a daily-updated dataset that contains every Tweet from every U.S. congressperson during their respective terms. We demonstrate that a modern language model equipped with congressperson-specific subsets of this data producing Tweets that are largely indistinguishable from actual Tweets posted by their physical counterparts. We illustrate how generated Tweets can be used to predict roll-call vote behaviors and to quantify the likelihood of congresspersons crossing party lines, thereby assisting stakeholders in allocating resources and potentially impacting real-world legislative dynamics. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations and important extensions of our analysis.

Abstract:
The expanding long-context capabilities of large language models are constrained by a significant memory bottleneck: the key-value (KV) cache required for autoregressive generation. This bottleneck is substantial; for instance, a Llama-3.1-8B model processing a 32K-token prompt at a batch size of 4 requires approximately 16 GB for its KV cache, exceeding the model’s weights. While KV-cache compression via low-rank projection is promising, existing methods rely on a static, offline-learned subspace that performs poorly under distribution shifts. To overcome these limitations, we introduce OjaKV, a novel framework integrating a hybrid storage policy with online subspace adaptation. OjaKV preserves crucial tokens in full rank as high-fidelity anchors, while applying low-rank compression to intermediate tokens by adapting the projection basis using Oja’s algorithm for online PCA. This adaptation involves a comprehensive update during prefilling and lightweight periodic updates during decoding, ensuring the subspace remains aligned with evolving context. Our framework is fully compatible with FlashAttention. Experiments demonstrate that OjaKV maintains or improves zero-shot accuracy at high compression ratios, achieving the strongest gains on long-context benchmarks requiring complex reasoning. Furthermore, our approach combines with token-selection methods for compounded memory savings, establishing a practical, plug-and-play solution for memory-efficient long-context inference without fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Large language models increasingly power AI agents for tasks requiring iterative refinement: document editing demands targeted revisions while preserving cross-references, code refactoring requires tracking function dependencies, and knowledge base updates cascade through related entities. Iterative editing with AI agents faces a fundamental efficiency-consistency tradeoff: maintaining consistency requires full-context awareness of dependencies, but processing entire documents for each edit incurs prohibitive token costs and latency. Isolated edits improve efficiency but risk breaking cross-references and violating semantic constraints. We introduce LEDGER (scaLing Agentic document editing with Dependency-aware Graph rEtRieval), a framework that constructs lightweight dependency graphs capturing semantic relationships and structural hierarchies across document elements. For each edit, graph traversal identifies affected elements and retrieves only necessary context. Experiments across 1,900 test cases spanning six state-of-the-art models show LEDGER achieves 76 consistency versus 56 baseline while reducing token usage by 85 . Critically, LEDGER with low reasoning effort matches baseline performance at high reasoning effort using 70 fewer tokens, suggesting explicit dependency representations can substitute for expensive internal reasoning with implications for agentic systems operating on structured data.

Abstract:
While most reading comprehension benchmarks for LLMs focus on factual information that can be answered by localizing specific textual evidence, many real-world tasks require understanding distributional information, such as population-level trends and preferences expressed across collections of text. We introduce Text2DistBench, a reading comprehension benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ ability to infer distributional knowledge from natural language. Built from real-world YouTube comments about movie and music entities, the benchmark provides models with entity metadata and associated comments, and requires them to answer distributional questions, such as estimating the proportions of positive and negative comments, or identifying the most and second most frequent topics discussed among viewers. To support reliable and long-term evaluation, the construction pipeline of Text2DistBench is fully automated and continuously updated to incorporate newly emerging entities over time. Experiments across multiple LLMs show that while models substantially outperform random baselines, performance varies widely across different distribution types and characteristics. These findings highlight both the capabilities and limitations of current LLMs in distributional reading comprehension and demonstrate the value of Text2DistBench as a practical and scalable testbed for future research.

Abstract:
While memory is a core component in agent systems, its behavioral impact in complex, long-horizon domains like machine learning engineering (MLE) remains poorly understood. Unlike short, reactive exchanges, MLE agents solve tasks through cycles of experimentation and improvement where past errors can inform future success. This paper presents a systematic study dissecting how memory influences agent behavior and performance across diverse MLE challenges. We first introduce a dynamic coding memory designed to capture and reuse debugging experiences, and integrate it into two representative agent paradigms: a sequential, chain-based agent that mirrors human-like iterative refinement, and a parallel, tree-based agent that performs broad, self-exploratory search in the code space. Our central finding is that the role of memory is contingent on the agent’s underlying architecture. For chain-based agents, memory proves highly beneficial, enabling them to avoid recurring mistakes and engage in more coherent, iterative refinement, which significantly improves reliability and task success. In contrast, for tree-based search agents, memory introduces a critical trade-off: it enhances procedural stability at the cost of constraining search diversity, which can prematurely narrow exploration and lead to suboptimal final solutions. These findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between procedural reliability and solution innovation modulated by memory, offering insights for designing more effective and robust MLE agents.

Abstract:
A first decision for any automated natural language processing system is the granularity of the input units. Traditionally, characters or words have been used, but recently, subwords have become the standard. In this paper, we investigate trends in input processing steps and discuss common shortcomings in this foundational first step of model design. We start by providing an overview of currently used tokenizers, showing that there is only minimal variety, with three highly similar designs dominating current models, and many of the tokenizers being exact duplicates. Next, we reconsider Unicode normalization strategies. Previous work has recommended applying consistent normalization; however, we argue that this removes signal and we show how this can harm performance for language classification. Finally, we take a closer look at UTF-8 character encoding, the very first layer of representation used in many language models. We argue that UTF-8 is not optimized for efficiency, nor for fairness across languages, and propose proof of concept alternatives focused on fairness and efficiency. Based on our findings, we recommend future work to 1) put more thought into subword segmentation and explore more diversity, 2) apply normalization only when beneficial 3) consider alternative character encodings for models operating on the byte-level.

Abstract:
The systematicity of natural language interpretation—our ability to understand novel expressions by compositionally combining familiar elements—has been central to debates about symbolic versus neural approaches to cognition since Fodor and Pylyshyn (1988). We investigate whether artificial neural networks can learn model-theoretic interpretation functions that generalize systematically to out-of-training-sample sentences, framing interpretation as an encoding task from discrete linguistic input to continuous truth-conditional representations. We extend Frank et al. (2009) with entity-level semantic representations, modern architectures (GRU, LSTM, Attention with AbsPE/RoPE), principled competing event generation, extended systematicity tests (∼350 vs. ∼80 sentences), and a two- dimensional difficulty analysis disaggregating results by modifier complexity. Across 140 trained models (7 architectures), we find that capacity-matched architectures perform comparably on easy tests, but gated recurrent networks (GRU and LSTM) significantly outperform transformer architectures on the hardest compositional generalization test (Basic Event), while ungated SRN does not—indicating that the gating mechanism is a critical factor. Entity vectors significantly improve scores on Basic Event across most architectures, with gated architectures benefiting most, validating formal semantics’ treatment of entities as important theoretical primitives. The extended test set reveals that systematicity difficulty has two dimensions: the type of systematicity test (as in Frank et al. 2009), and the number of modifiers being composed.

Abstract:
When a student fails an exam, do we tend to blame their effort or the test’s difficulty? Attribution, defined as how reasons are assigned to event outcomes, shapes perceptions, reinforces stereotypes, and influences decisions. Attribution Theory explains how people attribute causes to internal factors (effort, ability) or external ones (task difficulty, luck). LLMs’ attribution of event outcomes based on demographics carries important fairness implications. Most works exploring social biases in LLMs focus on surface-level associations or isolated stereotypes. This work proposes a cognitively grounded bias evaluation framework to identify how models’ reasoning disparities shape demographic bias across three contexts: single-actor, actor–actor, and actor–observer, capturing comparative and perspective-driven biases overlooked in prior work. Introducing a 140k-prompt benchmark covering ten scenarios and four social dimensions, our analyses reveal attribution asymmetries across identities that vary in multi-actor and observer settings, suggesting that other identities influence bias. This work underscores the need for cognitively grounded bias evaluation and informs future debiasing efforts through the proposed framework.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse domains. However, the reliability of responses from LLMs remains a question. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) of LLMs is crucial for ensuring their reliability, especially in areas such as healthcare. Existing UQ methods, often designed around a single resource such as Natural Language Inference (NLI) or graph-based metrics, fail to capture the multifaceted nature of uncertainty in natural language generation. In this work, we propose MS-UQ, a novel Multi-Resource Uncertainty Quantification framework that integrates heterogeneous uncertainty signals into a unified measure. Our approach concatenates matrices from diverse resources and employs tensor decomposition to orthogonally disentangle unique and shared information. To ensure scalability, we construct an adaptive ensemble of outputs from different decomposition methods, enabling the incorporation of new uncertainty sources. Experiments on CoQA, NQ_Open, and HotpotQA demonstrate that MS-UQ consistently outperforms existing methods, offering a comprehensive and scalable solution for uncertainty estimation in black-box LLMs and a more robust framework for enhancing LLM reliability in high-stakes applications. Our code can be accessed at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MDUQ-First-202E/README.md.

Abstract:
Most existing dialogue systems are user-driven, primarily designed to fulfill user requests. However, in many critical real-world scenarios, a conversational agent must proactively extract information to achieve its own objectives rather than merely respond. To address this gap, we introduce Inquisitive Conversational Agents (ICAs) and develop an ICA specifically tailored to U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments. We propose a Dual Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning framework featuring two cooperating RL agents, each with its own policy, to coordinate strategic dialogue management and fine-grained utterance generation. By learning when and how to ask probing questions, the agent emulates judicial questioning patterns and systematically uncovers crucial information to fulfill its legal objectives. Evaluations on a U.S. Supreme Court dataset show our method outperforms single-agent RL baselines in multiple metrics. Although specialized to a single legal domain, it represents an important first step toward broader high-stakes, domain-specific applications. We attached a part of the code as supplementary material. All code will be released upon publication for reproducibility.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models for test case generation have improved branch coverage via prompt-engineered mutations. However, they still lack principled mechanisms for steering models toward specific high-risk execution branches, limiting their effectiveness for discovering subtle bugs and security vulnerabilities. We propose GLMTest , the first program structure-aware LLM framework for targeted test case generation that seamlessly integrates code property graphs and code semantics using a graph neural network and a language model to condition test case generation on execution branches. This structured conditioning enables controllable and branch-targeted test case generation, thereby potentially enhancing bug and security risk discovery. Experiments on real-world projects show that GLMTest built on a Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct model improves branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on TestGenEval benchmark compared with state-of-the-art LLMs, i.e., Claude-Sonnet-4.5 and GPT-4o-mini.

Abstract:
Information cocoons on social media limit users’ exposure to posts with diverse viewpoints. Modern platforms use stance detection as an important signal in recommendation and ranking pipelines, which can route posts primarily to like-minded audiences and reduce cross-cutting exposure. This restricts the reach of dissenting opinions and hinders constructive discourse. We take the creator’s perspective and investigate how content can be revised to reach beyond existing affinity clusters. We present ContentFuzz, a confidence-guided fuzzing framework that rewrites posts while preserving their human-interpreted intent and induces different machine-inferred stance labels. ContentFuzz aims to route posts beyond their original cocoons. Our method guides a large language model (LLM) to generate meaning-preserving rewrites using confidence feedback from stance detection models. Evaluated on four representative stance detection models across three datasets in two languages, ContentFuzz effectively changes machine-classified stance labels, while maintaining semantic integrity with respect to the original content.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve state-of-the-art performance on challenging benchmarks by generating long chains of intermediate steps, but their inference cost is dominated by decoding, where each new token must attend to the entire growing sequence. One approach to reduce this latency is to evict entries from the key-value (KV) cache, thereby reducing the active context used in attention computation. However, such sparse attention methods suffer from severe accuracy degradation on reasoning tasks due to cumulative selection errors and the evolving importance of tokens over long derivations. We present DELTA, a training-free sparse attention mechanism that improves computational efficiency without sacrificing model accuracy. DELTA partitions transformer layers into three groups: initial layers that use full attention, a small set of Δ-layers that identify salient tokens via aggregated head-level attention scores, and subsequent sparse-attention layers that attend only to the selected subset. This design preserves the full KV cache in GPU memory for accuracy, while avoiding expensive full-attention computation over many layers. On reasoning benchmarks such as AIME and GPQA-Diamond, DELTA matches or surpasses full attention in accuracy, while reducing the number of attended tokens by up to 4.25× and delivering 1.54× end-to-end speedup. Our results show that selective reuse of intermediate attention maps offers a robust path toward efficient long-context reasoning. The code is available at https://github.com/hoenza/DELTA.

Abstract:
Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires grounding visual queries to external knowledge beyond directly observable content in images.While recent multi modal large language models (MLLMs) show strong perceptual abilities, they struggle on KB-VQA tasks requiring groundings from both fine-grained entity and evidence levels.Most existing multi-modal retrieval augmented generation (MM-RAG) methods tightly couple entity discrimination and section-level evidence ranking into a single re-ranking stage, leading to high cost and limited generalization.In this work, we revisit existing MM-RAG solutions from a workflow perspective and argue both entity-level and fact-level groundings are key bottlenecks.We observe that although MLLMs often fail under open-ended entity naming, they can better identify the correct entity when selecting from a small set of candidate names.Based on this insight, we propose a simple and training-free identify-before-answer IBA framework that decouples entity identification from section-level re-ranking.Our approach prompts an MLLM to select high-confidence entities using only candidate names, followed by an off-the-shelf textual re-ranker for evidence selection.Experiments on Encyclopedic-VQA and InfoSeek show that our method consistently outperforms fine-tuned multi-modal re-ranking baselines while reducing training and inference complexity.Additional analyses reveal that the improvements arise not only from better entity identification, but also from selecting more informative evidence once correct entity is fixed.Our implementation is made public to ease reproducibility

Abstract:
With the rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs), conversational AI agents have become widely deployed across real-world applications. To enhance safety, these agents are often equipped with guardrails that moderate harmful content. Identifying the guardrails in an agent thus becomes critical for adversaries to understand the system and design guard-specific attacks. In this work, we introduce AP-Test, a novel approach that leverages guard-specific adversarial prompts to detect the identity of guardrails deployed in black-box AI agents. Our method addresses key challenges in this task, including the influence of safety-aligned LLMs and other guardrails, as well as a lack of principled decision-making strategies. AP-Test employs two complementary testing strategies, input and output guard tests, and a new metric, match score, to enable robust identification. Experiments across diverse agents and four open-source guardrails demonstrate that AP-Test achieves perfect classification accuracy in multiple scenarios. Ablation studies further highlight the necessity of our proposed components. Our findings reveal a practical path toward guardrail identification in real-world AI systems.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language model (LLM) reasoning has focused on domains like mathematics and coding, where abundant high-quality data and objective evaluation metrics are readily available. In contrast, progress in scientific reasoning remains limited in domains such as medicine and materials science due to restricted dataset coverage and the inherent complexity of open-ended scientific questions. To address these challenges, we propose a general framework for sustainable scientific reasoning QA generation, and introduce WildSci, a new dataset of domain-specific science questions automatically synthesized from peer-reviewed literature, spanning 9 scientific disciplines and 26 subdomains. WildSci enables scalable training with well-defined reward signals in a multiple-choice format. We further apply reinforcement learning to finetune models on WildSci and analyze the resulting training dynamics, including domain-specific performance changes, response behaviors, and generalization trends. Experiments on a suite of scientific benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework and dataset. We release WildSci to enable scalable and sustainable research in scientific reasoning.

Abstract:
While recent safety guardrails effectively suppress overtly biased outputs, subtler forms of social bias emerge during complex logical reasoning tasks that evade current evaluation benchmarks. To fill this gap, we introduce a new evaluation framework, PRIME ( P uzzle R easoning for I mplicit Biases in M odel E valuation), that uses logic grid puzzles to systematically probe the influence of social stereotypes on logical reasoning and decision making in LLMs. Our use of logic puzzles enables automatic generation and verification, as well as variability in complexity and biased settings. PRIME includes stereotypical, anti-stereotypical, and neutral puzzle variants generated from a shared puzzle structure, allowing for controlled and fine-grained comparisons. We evaluate multiple model families across puzzle sizes and test the effectiveness of prompt-based mitigation strategies. Focusing our experiments on gender stereotypes, our findings highlight that models consistently reason more accurately when solutions align with stereotypical associations. This demonstrates the significance of PRIME for diagnosing and quantifying social biases perpetuated in the deductive reasoning of LLMs, where fairness is critical.

Abstract:
Negation is a common and important semantic feature in natural language, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle when negation is involved in natural language understanding tasks. Commonsense knowledge, on the other hand, despite being a well-studied topic, lacks investigations involving negation. In this work, we show that commonsense knowledge with negation is challenging for models to understand. We present a novel approach to automatically augment existing commonsense knowledge corpora with negation, yielding two new corpora containing over 2M triples with if-then relations. In addition, pre-training LLMs on our corpora benefits negation understanding.

Abstract:
Previous research has sought to enhance the graph reasoning capabilities of LLMs by supervised fine-tuning on synthetic graph data. While these led to specialized LLMs better at solving graph algorithm problems, we don’t need LLMs for shortest path: we need generalization from synthetic graph data to real-world tasks with implicit graph structures. In this work, we propose to unlock generalizable learning of graph with post-training alignment with synthetic data. We first design solution-based and process-based rewards for synthetic graph problems: instead of rigid memorizing response patterns in direct fine-tuning, we posit that post-training alignment would help LLMs grasp the essentials underlying graph reasoning and alleviate overfitting on synthetic data. We employ post-training alignment algorithms such as GRPO and DPO, aligning both off-the-shelf LLMs and LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic graph data. We then compare them against existing settings on both in-domain synthetic tasks and out-of-domain real-world tasks with implicit graph structures such as multi-hop QA, structured planning, and more. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our post-training alignment recipe leads to statistically significant improvement on 5 datasets, with an average gain of 12.9% over baseline settings. Further analysis reveals that process-based rewards consistently outperform solution-based rewards on synthetic data but not on real-world tasks, and compositionality and explainable intermediate steps remains a critical challenge even after post-training alignment.

Abstract:
A major challenge for the operation of large language models (LLMs) is how to predict whether a specific LLM will produce sufficiently high-quality output for a given query. Existing approaches rely on external classifiers, most commonly BERT-based models, which suffer from limited context windows, constrained representational capacity, and additional computational overhead. We propose IntroLM, a method that enables causal language models to predict their own output quality during the prefilling phase without affecting generation using [CPX] tokens. By introducing token-conditional LoRA that activates only for the introspective [CPX] token, the model learns to predict the output quality for a given query while preserving the original backbone behavior and avoiding external evaluators. On question-answering benchmarks, IntroLM applied to Qwen3-8B achieves a ROC–AUC of 90% for success prediction, outperforming a DeBERTa-v3-Large classifier by 14%. When integrated into multi-model routing systems, IntroLM achieves superior cost–performance trade-offs, reducing end-to-end latency by up to 33% and large-model usage by up to 50% at matched reliability. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhosseini1377/LLM_routing.

Abstract:
Simultaneous Machine Translation (SiMT) requires high-quality translations under strict real-time constraints, which traditional policies with only READ/WRITE actions cannot fully address. We extend the action space of SiMT with four adaptive actions: Sentence_Cut, Drop, Partial_Summarization and Pronominalization, which enable real-time restructuring, omission, and simplification while preserving semantic fidelity. We adapt these actions in a large language model (LLM) framework and construct training references through action-aware prompting. To evaluate both quality and word-level monotonicity, we further develop a latency-aware TTS pipeline that maps textual outputs to speech with realistic timing. Experiments on the ACL60/60 English-Chinese, English-German and English-Japanese benchmarks show that our framework consistently improves semantic metrics and achieves lower delay compared to reference translations and salami-based baselines. Notably, combining Drop and Sentence_Cut leads to consistent improvements in the balance between fluency and latency. These results demonstrate that enriching the action space of LLM-based SiMT provides a promising direction for bridging the gap between human and machine interpretation.

Abstract:
Advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) intensify concerns about data safety, making Machine Unlearning (MU), the selective removal of harmful/private information, a critical necessity. However, existing MU benchmarks for MLLMs are limited by a lack of image diversity, coarse-grained unlearning target, and insufficient evaluation scenarios, which fail to capture the complexity of real-world applications. To facilitate the development of MLLMs unlearning and alleviate the aforementioned limitations, we introduce OFFSIDE, a novel benchmark for evaluating misinformation unlearning in MLLMs. This manually curated dataset contains 15.68K records for 80 players, providing a comprehensive framework with four test sets to assess forgetting efficacy, generalization, utility, and robustness. OFFSIDE supports advanced unlearning targets, such as fine-grained unlearning and visual rumor removal. Our extensive evaluation of multiple baselines not only extends key findings from LLM MU to MLLM MU: (1) unlearned rumors can be easily recovered through relearning and (2) all methods are vulnerable to prompt attacks, but also introduces novel insights in the context of MLLM: (1) unimodal methods fail to handle multimodal rumors, (2) unlearning efficacy is primarily driven by catastrophic forgetting statistically, and (3) all methods struggle with visual rumors (rumors embedded in images). These results expose significant vulnerabilities in current approaches, highlighting the need for more robust multimodal unlearning solutions.

Abstract:
Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction in Conversations (ECPEC) aims to identify the set of causal relations between emotion utterances and their triggering causes within a dialogue. Most existing approaches formulate ECPEC as independent pairwise classification, overlooking the distinct semantics of emotion diffusion and cause explanation, and failing to capture globally consistent many-to-many conversational causality. To address these limitations, we revisit ECPEC from a semantic perspective and seek to disentangle emotion-oriented semantics from cause-oriented semantics, mapping them into two complementary representation spaces to better capture their distinct conversational roles. Building on this semantic decoupling, we naturally formulate ECPEC as a global alignment problem between the emotion-side and cause-side representations, and employ optimal transport to enable many-to-many and globally consistent emotion-cause matching. Based on this perspective, we propose a unified framework SCALE that instantiates the above semantic decoupling and alignment principle within a shared conversational structure. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that SCALE consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Long-reasoning models achieve strong accuracy on complex reasoning tasks, but their extended reasoning trajectories incur substantial memory and latency costs. Several existing shortening methods rely on additional supervision or multi-stage post-training, which primarily reduces inference length and does not reduce the rollout tokens during on-policy reinforcement learning (RL). We instead target on-policy response shortening, aiming to improve both inference efficiency and RL training throughput. However, because on-policy RL couples optimization with exploration, naively penalizing length can destabilize training and suppress exploration. To impose length pressure safely, we propose a lazy length penalty integrated into the rule-based RL pipeline: it activates only on correct trajectories, only after training accuracy enters a stably improving regime, and only when responses exceed a tolerance band beyond the minimal correct length. Across four settings, our method significantly reduces response length without extra training stages while maintaining or improving performance. In a logic reasoning setting, we achieve a 40% reduction in step-averaged response length alongside a 14-point gain in performance. For math problems, we reduce step-averaged response length by 33% while preserving performance.

Abstract:
Conversational Query Rewriting (CQR) aims to rewrite ambiguous queries to achieve more efficient conversational search. Early studies have predominantly focused on the rewriting in isolation, ignoring the feedback from query rewrite, passage retrieval and response generation in the rewriting process. To address this issue, we propose Multi-Faceted Self-Consistent Preference Aligned CQR (MSPA-CQR). Specifically, we first construct self-consistent preference alignment data from three dimensions (rewriting, retrieval, and response) to generate more diverse rewritten queries. Then we propose prefix guided multi-faceted direct preference optimization to learn preference information from three different dimensions. The experimental results show that our MSPA-CQR is effective in both in- and out-of-distribution scenarios.

Abstract:
Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is a widely used strategy for efficient fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs), but its strictly linear structure fundamentally limits expressive capacity. The bilinear formulation of weight updates captures only first-order dependencies between low-rank factors, restricting the modeling of nonlinear and higher-order parameter interactions.In this paper, we propose Polynomial Expansion Rank Adaptation (PERA), a novel method that introduces structured polynomial expansion directly into the low-rank factor space.By expanding each low-rank factor to synthesize high-order interaction terms before composition, PERA transforms the adaptation space into a polynomial manifold capable of modeling richer nonlinear coupling without increasing rank or inference cost.We provide theoretical analysis demonstrating that PERA offers enhanced expressive capacity and more effective feature utilization compare to existing linear adaptation approaches.Empirically, PERA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods across diverse benchmarks. Notably, our experiments show that incorporating high-order nonlinear components—particularly square terms—is crucial for enhancing expressive capacity and maintaining strong and robust performance under various rank settings.

Abstract:
Large language models often hallucinate, producing content that is factually incorrect or not grounded in the sources. Reliable faithfulness verification is critical for trustworthy deployment. In the provided-source (closed-world) setting, existing verifiers either classify whole passages in one step or check sentences independently, overlooking cross-sentence context. We present ContextCheck, a framework for sentence-level faithfulness verification with context-aware disambiguation. Each sentence is verified against the grounding document while conditioning on preceding sentences, enabling pronouns and references to be resolved directly in context. This design avoids the separate decontextualization step of rewriting claims into self-contained forms, casting verification as a context-conditioned task. Fine-tuned from Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, ContextCheck sets a new state of the art on three context-dependent datasets; it improves Macro F1 by over 10 points compared to the strongest baselines, and matches or slightly surpasses the strongest baselines on 14 standard single-sentence datasets compared to prior 8B-scale verifiers (average Macro F1 73.5 vs. 72.8). These results show that ContextCheck offers a practical and effective approach for sentence-level hallucination detection.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) face a critical alignment challenge: balancing safety with helpfulness. Excessive safety can lead to over-refusal, where models reject harmful-looking yet benign queries, severely limiting utility.Existing training-free interventions offer an efficient way to mitigate over-refusal without re-training, but suffer from high inference overhead and architecture dependency. Our work explores a complementary direction: rather than applying post-hoc corrections to model outputs, our goal is to intrinsically reshape the distributions of harmful and benign samples within the model’s decision space. In this paper, we argue that a lightweight training-based approach can more effectively distinguish between harmful and benign samples. We propose Single Token Alignment (STA), which optimizes only a single-token prefix (e.g., 4,096 parameters) while keeping the base model frozen. To address the inherent challenge of achieving robust refinement through such a minimal parameter interface, STA employs a mixed weighting mechanism integrated with its optimization objective. This mechanism incorporates hard weighting via stringent data filtering to provide clear, unbiased learning signals, and soft weighting through a focal mechanism to prioritize challenging cases.Extensive experiments across 9 models and 10 datasets demonstrate that STA achieves a superior safety-helpfulness balance for LLMs, MLLMs, and reasoning models, offering a highly efficient and generalizable solution for refining safety alignment.

Abstract:
Node Importance Estimation (NIE) in Knowledge Graphs (KGs) aims to quantify the significance of entities, serving as a pivotal instrument for deciphering the latent mechanisms of social dynamics. However, existing methods are often confined to supervised paradigms and rely heavily on topological aggregation, resulting in limited generalization capability. To address these challenges, we propose GenNIE, the first end-to-end generative reasoning framework for NIE. Specifically, GenNIE leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) integrated with topological information to generate precise importance scores for entities in KGs. Furthermore, GenNIE introduces a Global-Structural Graph Perception mechanism to empower the LLMs with holistic graph cognition. Extensive experiments demonstrate the performance superiority of GenNIE and its robust generalization across diverse domains. Our code is available at https://github.com/CoffeyF/GenNIE.git.

Abstract:
Dataset Pruning (DP) aims to construct a coreset that achieves performance comparable to the original, full dataset. However, few studies have explored DP in the context of Speech Classification (SC) tasks. Unlike image or text classification, SC is particularly challenging due to the difficulty in capturing the acoustic, semantic, and contextual representations. In this study, we propose a novel dataset pruning method for speech datasets, termed Meltrim, which uses a two-step coarse-to-fine framework designed to address these challenges. Specifically, in Step 1, Meltrim coarsely filters utterance-level redundant samples using DBSCAN clustering on Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) features, which are first flattened and then reduced in dimensionality using UMAP. In Step 2, we perform frame-level redundancy pruning for each utterance via utility pruning, which aims to eliminate irrelevant frames within each utterance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first dataset pruning approach designed for Speech Classification tasks, demonstrating outstanding performance compared to classical general DP methods. Notably, for the Speech Emotion Recognition, our method achieves up to a 49.5% improvement in WA (Weighted Accuracy) on the MEAD dataset. For the Speaker Identification tasks, it results in a 41.9% reduction in EER (Equal Error Rate) on the VoxCeleb1 dataset.

Abstract:
Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents aim to automate a wide spectrum of human tasks by emulating user interaction. Despite rapid advancements, current approaches are hindered by several critical challenges: data bottleneck in end-to-end training, high cost of delayed error detection, and risk of contradictory guidance. Inspired by the human cognitive loop of Thinking, Alignment, and Reflection, we present D-Artemis—a novel deliberative framework in this paper. D-Artemis leverages a fine-grained, app-specific tip retrieval mechanism to inform its decision-making process. It also employs a proactive Pre-execution Alignment stage, where Thought-Action Consistency (TAC) Check module and Action Correction Agent (ACA) work in concert to mitigate the risk of execution failures. A post-execution Status Reflection Agent (SRA) completes the cognitive loop, enabling strategic learning from experience. Crucially, D-Artemis enhances the capabilities of general-purpose Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for GUI tasks without the need for training on complex trajectory datasets, demonstrating strong generalization. D-Artemis achieves SOTA among open-source general models on AndroidWorld (75.8%) and ScreenSpot-V2 (96.8%). Extensive ablation studies further demonstrate the significant contribution of each proposed component.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs), despite their success in question answering, exhibit limitations in complex multi-hop question answering (MQA) tasks that necessitate non-linear, structured reasoning. This limitation stems from their inability to adequately capture deep conceptual relationships between entities. To overcome this challenge, we present ORACLE (Ontology-driven Reasoning And Chain for Logical Elucidation), a training-free framework that combines LLMs’ generative capabilities with the structural benefits of knowledge graphs. Our approach operates through three stages: (1) dynamic construction of question-specific knowledge ontologies using LLMs, (2) transformation of these ontologies into First-Order Logic (FOL) reasoning chains, and (3) systematic decomposition of the original query into logically coherent sub-questions. Extensive experiments across a diverse set of models and standard MQA benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves competitive performance while producing more interpretable reasoning chains.

Abstract:
Large Language Models have shown promise in translating natural language into executable optimization models, yet they often suffer from the Sisyphus Dilemma: a memoryless cycle where identical errors are repeated across structurally similar problems. Existing retrieval-augmented strategies primarily fetch static problem-model pairs as few-shot demonstrators, failing to capture the dynamic reasoning required to resolve execution failures. To bridge this gap, we propose EOM , a framework that implements Experience Replay to transform transient rectification steps into persistent knowledge. EOM distills interaction histories into Causal Correction Mappings, indexing both diagnostic insights and prohibitive traps. By utilizing a structure-aware retrieval mechanism that aligns semantic intent with abstract syntax trees and solver tracebacks, the system enables models to recall specific correction strategies for isomorphic errors. Extensive experiments across seven benchmarks demonstrate that EOM improves modeling accuracy by 8.45% on complex tasks while reducing token consumption by 28.65% and interaction turns by 25.82%, validating the efficiency of a “Rectify Once, Solve Many” paradigm.

Abstract:
Framing theory posits that how information is presented shapes audience responses, but computational work has largely ignored audience reactions. While recent work has shown that article framing systematically shapes the content of reader responses, this paper asks: does framing also affect response quality? Analyzing 1M comments across 2.7K news articles, we operationalize quality as comment health. We find that article frames significantly predict comment health while controlling for topic, and that comments that adopt the article frame are healthier than those that depart from it. Further, unhealthy top-level comments tend to generate more unhealthy responses, independent of the frame being used in the comment. Our results establish a link between framing theory and discourse quality, laying the groundwork for downstream applications. We illustrate this potential with a pro-active frame-aware LLM- based system to mitigate unhealthy discourse.

Abstract:
Multimodal representation is crucial for E-commerce tasks such as identical product retrieval. Large representation models (e.g., VLM2Vec) demonstrate strong multimodal understanding capabilities, yet they struggle with fine-grained semantic comprehension, which is essential for distinguishing highly similar items. To address this, we propose Attribute-Enhanced Fine-Grained Multi-Modal Representation Learning (AFMRL), which defines product fine-grained understanding as an attribute generation task. It leverages the generative power of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to extract key attributes from product images and text, and enhances representation learning through a two-stage training framework: 1) Attribute-Guided Contrastive Learning (AGCL), where the key attributes generated by the MLLM are used in the image-text contrastive learning training process to identify hard samples and filter out noisy false negatives. 2) Retrieval-aware Attribute Reinforcement (RAR), where the improved retrieval performance of the representation model post-attribute integration serves as a reward signal to enhance MLLM’s attribute generation during multimodal fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on large-scale E-commerce datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple downstream retrieval tasks, validating the effectiveness of harnessing generative models to advance fine-grained representation learning.

Abstract:
Recently, latent reasoning has been introduced into large language models (LLMs) to leverage rich information within a continuous space.However, without stochastic sampling, these methods inevitably collapse to deterministic inference, failing to discover diverse reasoning paths.To bridge the gap, we inject controllable stochasticity into latent reasoning via Gumbel-Softmax, restoring LLMs’ exploratory capacity and enhancing their compatibility with Reinforcement Learning (RL).Building on this, we propose Latent Reasoning Policy Optimization (LEPO), a novel framework that applies RL directly to continuous latent representations.Specifically, in rollout stage, LEPO maintains stochasticity to enable diverse trajectory sampling, while in optimization stage, LEPO constructs a unified gradient estimation for both latent representations and discrete tokens.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR). However, the practical application is often hindered by frequent errors in tool invocations, such as incorrect parameters or malformed formats. Prevailing training paradigms, such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), can mitigate these issues but require modification on the base LLM. This lack of modularity necessitates extensive retraining when deploying the system across different base models. To address the limitation, we introduce the Invocation Refiner, a specialized post-processing module designed to enhance the tool-use reliability of base LLMs without directly training on them. The Refiner takes the output from a frozen upstream LLM and the user’s query as input, performing independent reasoning to rectify the invocation. We construct a dedicated training dataset and train this module using an advanced RL algorithm. On a diverse set of tool-use and reasoning benchmarks, our Refiner improves task completion rates and invocation accuracy over the raw outputs of various upstream LLMs. This highlights our Refiner as a plug-and-play solution for improving the operational reliability of LLM-based agents. We release our code to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Large audio-language models (LALMs) generalize across speech, sound, and music, but unified decoders can exhibit a temporal smoothing bias: transient acoustic cues may be underutilized in favor of temporally smooth context that is better supported by language priors, leading to less specific audio-grounded outputs. We propose Temporal Contrastive Decoding (TCD), a training-free decoding method for unified LALMs that mitigates this effect at inference time. TCD constructs a temporally blurred slow-path view by smoothing the input waveform and re-encoding it, then contrasts next-token logits from the original and slow-path views. The contrastive signal is applied as a token-level logit update restricted to a small candidate set. A self-normalized stability score sets the blur window and update scale, and a step-wise gate based on uncertainty and audio reliance activates the update only when needed. Experiments on MMAU and AIR-Bench show consistent improvements on strong unified LALMs. We further conduct ablations and an architectural applicability study to analyze the contributions of key components and how TCD behaves across large audio-language model designs.

Abstract:
Deploying and fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on resource-constrained edge devices requires navigating a strict trade-off between memory footprint and task performance. Existing quantization-aware fine-tuning methods typically decouple weight precision and adapter capacity, overlooking that a layer’s ability to adapt is constrained by the information preserved in its frozen weights. Layers that are highly sensitive to quantization—whether due to representational specialization or accumulated error propagation—can become bottlenecks that adapter rank alone cannot recover. To address this issue, we introduce QR-Adaptor , a unified framework that jointly optimizes per-layer quantization bit-width and LoRA rank. We formulate resource allocation as a multi-objective discrete search guided by empirical layer-wise sensitivity, and implement it with a three-stage pipeline comprising KL-based sensitivity profiling, evolutionary exploration, and Bayesian refinement. Extensive experiments across LLaMA and Qwen models, including modern instruction tuning on OpenOrca and comparisons with strong PEFT baselines such as QDoRA, show that QR-Adaptor establishes a strong Pareto frontier: under a strict 4-bit memory budget, it matches or approaches 16-bit baselines while using substantially less memory.

Abstract:
Large language models perform well on many reasoning tasks, yet they often lack awareness of whether their current knowledge or reasoning state is complete. In non-interactive puzzle settings, the narrative is fixed and the underlying structure is hidden; once a model forms an early hypothesis under incomplete premises, it can propagate that error throughout the reasoning process, leading to unstable conclusions. To address this issue, we propose SABA, a reasoning framework that explicitly introduces self-awareness of missing premises before making the final decision. SABA formulates reasoning as a recursive process that alternates between structured state construction and obstacle resolution: it first applies Information Fusion to consolidate the narrative into a verifiable base state, and then uses Query-driven Structured Reasoning to identify and resolve missing or underspecified premises by turning them into queries and progressively completing the reasoning state through hypothesis construction and state refinement. Across multiple evaluation metrics, SABA achieves the best performance on all three difficulty splits of the non-interactive Detective Puzzle benchmark, and it also maintains leading results on multiple public benchmarks.

Abstract:
While large language models exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, prior work shows that their performance can be further enhanced by encouraging greater exploration. However, existing approaches overlook the presence of unhealthy exploration that increases exploration-related token usage without contributing to effective problem-solving. In this work, we show that prompt ambiguity can artificially prolong early-stage exploration, manifested as an elevated and delayed early-stage entropy peak. Although this uncertainty may be gradually resolved as reasoning progresses, reflected in the eventual convergence of the late-stage entropy peak, it does not meaningfully improve accuracy or self-consistency and instead substantially reduces reasoning efficiency. Motivated by these observations, we propose an entropy-dynamics-aware prompt optimization framework that trains a lightweight optimizer to generate concise clarifications. These clarifications aim to reduce ambiguity-induced early-stage uncertainty while preserving the model’s reasoning capabilities. Extensive experiments across multiple models, reasoning budgets, and benchmarks demonstrate that our approach consistently improves reasoning efficiency by up to 52%, by reducing unhealthy exploration without sacrificing accuracy.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate expert-level medical knowledge, aligning their open-ended outputs with fine-grained clinician preferences remains challenging. Existing methods often rely on coarse objectives or unreliable automated judges that are weakly grounded in professional guidelines. We propose a two-stage framework to address this gap. First, we introduce HealthRubrics, a dataset of 7,034 physician-verified preference examples in which clinicians refine LLM-drafted rubrics to meet rigorous medical standards. Second, we distill these rubrics into HealthPrinciples: 119 broadly reusable, clinically grounded principles organized by clinical dimensions, enabling scalable supervision beyond manual annotation. We use HealthPrinciples for (1) offline alignment by synthesizing rubrics for unlabeled queries and (2) an inference-time tool for guided self-revision. A 30A3B model with our framework achieves 33.4% on HealthBench-Hard, outperforming much larger models including Deepseek-R1 and o3, establishing a resource-efficient baseline for clinical alignment.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown strong promise for LLM-based machine translation, with recent methods such as GRPO demonstrating notable gains; nevertheless, translation-oriented RL remains challenged by high-variance policy gradients induced by Monte Carlo baselines, as well as a large trajectory space that favors global exploration over fine-grained local optimization. We introduce PEGRL , a two-stage RL framework that uses post-editing as an auxiliary task to stabilize training and guide overall optimization. At each step, translation outputs are sampled to construct post-editing inputs, enabling lower-variance gradients from the post-editing task to propagate through the entire framework while jointly supporting both global exploration and fine-grained local optimization. A task-specific weighting scheme further emphasizes the post-editing gradient, producing a biased yet more sample-efficient estimator. Experiments on English → Finnish, English → Turkish, and English ↔ Chinese show consistent gains over RL baselines, and for English → Turkish, performance on COMETKiwi is comparable to advanced LLM-based systems (DeepSeek-V3.2). Our code and a set of representative pretrained models are publicly available at https://github.com/NJUNLP/peg-rl and https://huggingface.co/collections/DGME/pegrl .

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is a widely adopted approach for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models, enabling effective adaptation with a small number of trainable parameters. However, its reliance on linear low-rank projections restricts adaptation to linear subspaces, which can limit flexibility on complex downstream tasks. To address this, we propose RanLoRA, a Residual-aware nonlinear Low-Rank Adaptation approach that leverages the decomposition structure of pretrained weights. We used Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to decompose pretrained weights into principal components that are kept frozen and residual components that are used for task-specific adaptation. To enhance the expressiveness of linear low-rank updates, RanLoRA incorporates a nonlinear activation layer together with a Hadamard-product-based vector modulation. This design supports an implicit progressive adaptation behavior, where optimization evolves from coarse approximation of dominant components toward residual alignment and fine-grained nonlinear refinement. Experiments on benchmarks covering commonsense reasoning, natural language understanding, image classification, and mathematical reasoning show that RanLoRA consistently outperforms vanilla LoRA and representative variants under comparable parameter budgets. These results suggest that incorporating structured nonlinearity into adapter design can enhance representational flexibility and generalization across tasks in large models.

Abstract:
Multi-step retrieval-augmented generation has attracted increasing attention due to its capacity to improve the factuality of large language models with iterative retrieved knowledge. However, the performance of multi-step RAG systems is susceptible to potential retrieval noise and fabricated documents in real-world scenarios. Current approaches usually utilize supervised fine-tuning on predetermined noisy contexts to enhance the robustness. However, their performance remains inadequate when it comes to more complicated long-context scenarios due to the lack of adaptability. Towards this end, we propose a novel framework named Context-attended Adversarial Reinforcement Learning (CARE) for multi-step RAG systems against attacks. The core of our CARE is to conduct reinforcement learning on adversarial samples which are alternatingly enhanced with text gradients. In particular, our CARE includes a reward model to identify the accuracy of responses, which is minimized for the generation of adversarial samples with text gradients. These context-attended noisy samples are then utilized for reinforcement learning to maximize the rewards. The whole framework is conducted alternatingly from easy to hard samples to ensure the smoothness of the optimization. Extensive experiments on multi-step RAG benchmark datasets are conducted to validate the superiority of our proposed CARE in multiple noisy scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/yingtaoren/CARE.

Abstract:
With the rise of advanced reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) are receiving increasing attention. While reasoning enhances LLMs’ performance on downstream tasks, it also introduces new threat vectors, as adversaries can leverage these capabilities to conduct backdoor attacks. Prior surveys provide broad overviews of backdoor attacks and reasoning security; however, a systematic survey focused on backdoor attacks and defenses against LLM reasoning is still absent. In this paper, we take the first step toward providing a comprehensive review of reasoning-based backdoor attacks in LLMs by analyzing their underlying mechanisms, methodological frameworks, and unresolved challenges. Specifically, we introduce a new taxonomy that offers a unified perspective for summarizing existing approaches, categorizing reasoning-based backdoor attacks into associative, passive, and active. We also summarize defenses against such attacks and discuss current challenges alongside future research directions.

Abstract:
Existing in-context editing (ICE) methods for multi-hop knowledge editing commonly suffer from paraphrase sensitivity, which refers to the phenomenon where these methods are not sufficiently robust to paraphrased multi-hop questions. To improve retrieval accuracy and knowledge routing to address paraphrase sensitivity, this paper proposes a novel entity-aware inference-time knowledge routing method, referred to as EAIR, which consists of four major steps: 1) Entity-referential query decomposition, which decomposes the original question into multiple entity-referential sub-question instructions; 2) Entity-aware retrieval, which leverages the previously reference-resolved topic entity in the retrieval step; 3) Evidence-conditioned contrastive decoding, which discourages the model from relying on its parametric knowledge and steers the model toward following retrieved edits; 4) Reflection-based knowledge routing, which additionally filters decoding results using refusal-style reflection to mitigate the risk introduced by contrastive decoding. Experimental results across the MQuAKE benchmark family and model scales show that EAIR achieves the highest strict case accuracy in 11 of 12 settings, substantially reducing paraphrase sensitivity.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) is widely used for post-training large language models (LLMs) in code editing, where group-relative methods, such as GRPO, are popular due to their critic-free and normalized advantage estimation. However, in real-world code-editing scenarios, reward distributions are often skewed with unpredictable noise, leading to distorted advantage computation and increased rollout outliers. To address this issue, we propose Group Adaptive Policy Optimization (GAPO), which adaptively finds an interval with the highest SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) per prompt and uses the median of that interval as an adaptive Q to replace the group mean in advantage calculation to reduce noise further. This adaptive Q robustly handles rollout noise while remaining plug-and-play and efficient. We evaluate GAPO on nine instruction-tuned LLMs (3B–14B) using a collected large dataset of 51,844 real-world, history-aware code-editing tasks spanning 10 programming languages. GAPO yields up to 4.35 in-domain (ID) and 5.30 out-of-domain (OOD) exact-match improvements over GRPO and its variant DAPO, while achieving lower clipping ratios and higher GPU throughput. Code: https://github.com/TsingZ0/verl-GAPO

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating retrieved documents and/or generated context. However, LLMs often exhibit a stylistic bias when presented with mixed contexts, favoring fluent but hallucinated generated content over factually grounded yet disorganized retrieved evidence. This phenomenon reveals that the utility of retrieved information is bottlenecked by its presentation. To bridge this gap, we propose QREAM , a style-controlled rewriter that aligns retrieved documents with a question-oriented style while preserving facts, better for LLM readers to utilize. Our framework consists of two stages: (1) QREAM-ICL , which uses stylistic seeds to guide iterative rewriting exploration; and (2) QREAM-FT , a lightweight student model distilled from denoised ICL outputs. QREAM-FT employs dual-criteria rejection sampling, filtering based on answer correctness and factual consistency to ensure high-quality supervision. QREAM seamlessly integrates into existing RAG pipelines as a plug-and-play module. Experiments demonstrate that QREAM consistently enhances advanced RAG pipelines, yielding up to 8% relative improvement with negligible latency overhead, effectively balancing question relevance with factual grounding.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) is effective for improving code generation but suffers from data scarcity. While experience replay mitigates this, existing approaches rely on static, in-epoch metrics that overlook training dynamics, often introducing low-utility or outdated data. Analyzing RL dynamics via dataset cartography, we observe that “ambiguous” samples, which are vital for model generalization, rapidly migrate to “easy-to-learn” regions, diminishing their training value. To address this, we propose Adaptive Ambiguity Replay (A2R) for RL, a plug-and-play module that prioritizes cross-epoch ambiguous samples. To neutralize the noise from stale experiences, A2R incorporates an adaptive importance mechanism based on policy divergence to weigh replayed rollouts. Extensive experiments on nine LLMs (3B–14B) demonstrate that A2R outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on real-world code editing tasks across both unseen and learned domains. Our results highlight cross-epoch ambiguity as a key factor for effective replay in RL. Code: https://github.com/TsingZ0/verl-A2R

Abstract:
We introduce softpick, a rectified, not sum-to-one, drop-in replacement for softmax in transformer attention mechanisms that eliminates attention sink and massive activations. Our experiments with 340M and 1.8B parameter models demonstrate that softpick achieves 0% sink rate consistently. The softpick transformers produce hidden states with significantly lower kurtosis and creates sparse attention maps. Quantized models using softpick outperform softmax on standard benchmarks, with a particularly pronounced advantage at lower bit precisions. Our analysis and discussion shows how softpick has the potential to open new possibilities for quantization, low-precision training, sparsity optimization, pruning, and interpretability. Our code: https://github.com/zaydzuhri/softpick-attention.

Abstract:
While Audio Large Models (ALLMs) have achieved remarkable proficiency, their robustness remains brittle in real-world deployment. Existing evaluations largely rely on synthetic Gaussian noise or simplistic single-source interference, failing to capture the intricate, multi-layered acoustic dynamics—or "Acoustic Ecology"—that characterize authentic physical environments. To bridge this ecological gap, we introduce RSA-Bench, a comprehensive robustness benchmark designed to stress-test ALLMs through high-fidelity auditory scene simulations. Unlike traditional methods, we construct evaluation samples by naturally superimposing diverse environmental soundscapes—spanning Pasture, Extreme Weather, Classroom, and Outdoors—onto clean speech signals across a spectrum of interference intensities. By evaluating models on six core tasks ranging from fundamental perception to complex reasoning, our study unveils three macro-level insights: (I) The Perception-Cognition Gap: Models maintain relative resilience in low-level recognition but suffer a functional collapse in high-order reasoning tasks under stress; (II) Scenario Sensitivity: "Vocal-like" interference (e.g., children playing) proves significantly more destructive than mechanical noise, challenging the model’s auditory attention mechanisms; and (III) The Denoising Paradox: Standard speech enhancement often exacerbates performance degradation, as ALLMs prove highly sensitive to the semantic distortions introduced by denoising artifacts.

Abstract:
Generative commonsense reasoning (GCR) requires models to synthesize coherent narratives that simultaneously satisfy lexical constraints and commonsense logic. Although ensemble-based LLM strategies are widely adopted to alleviate the fragility of single-chain reasoning, we uncover a counterintuitive homogeneity trap in GCR. Specifically, we observe that increasing the number of reasoning chains can degrade performance, as the generated chains tend to collapse into a narrow semantic region, thereby reinforcing shared biases rather than providing complementary evidence. We posit that escaping this trap requires fundamentally broadening semantic coverage via heterogeneous sources. Our investigation into the nature of diversity reveals that deep semantic diversity, rather than surface-level lexical variation, is the decisive prerequisite for effective integration. Motivated by this insight, we propose an Explore-then-Integrate framework, in which high–semantic-entropy explorers capture diverse concept bindings, and a powerful integrator performs compositional synthesis to merge valid fragments into coherent narratives. Crucially, to ensure that the observed performance gains arise from accurate logical composition rather than trivial best-candidate selection, we introduce a provenance-aware evaluation suite that explicitly quantifies the heterogeneous origins of synthesized outputs. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the consistent superiority of our approach across a range of metrics. Notably, our method achieves over 10% improvement in overall accuracy on NoRa and in SPICE score on CommonGen-Lite.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models have recently demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks that require long chain-of-thought reasoning, through supervised fine-tuning on large-scale and high-quality datasets. To construct such datasets, existing pipelines generate long reasoning data from more capable Large Language Models (LLMs) and apply manually heuristic or naturalness-based selection methods to filter high-quality samples. Despite the proven effectiveness of naturalness-based data selection, which ranks data by the average log probability assigned by LLMs, our analysis shows that, when applied to LLM reasoning datasets, it systematically prefers samples with longer reasoning steps (i.e., more tokens per step) rather than higher-quality ones, a phenomenon we term step length confounding. Through quantitative analysis, we attribute this phenomenon to low-probability first tokens in reasoning steps; longer steps dilute their influence, thereby inflating the average log probabilities. To address this issue, we propose two variant methods: ASLEC-DROP, which drops first-token probabilities when computing average log probability, and ASLEC-CASL, which applies a causal debiasing regression to remove the first tokens’ confounding effect. Experiments across four LLMs and five evaluation benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in mitigating the step length confounding problem.

Abstract:
Training data is a critical and often proprietary asset in Large Language Model (LLM) development, motivating the use of data watermarking to embed model-transferable signals for usage verification. We identify low coverage as a vital yet largely overlooked requirement for practicality, as individual data owners typically contribute only a minute fraction of massive training corpora. Prior methods fail to maintain stealthiness, verification feasibility, or robustness when only one or a few sequences can be modified. To address these limitations, we introduce SLIM, a framework enabling per-user data provenance verification under strict black-box access. SLIM leverages intrinsic LLM properties to induce a Latent-Space Confusion Zone by training the model to map semantically similar prefixes to divergent continuations. This manifests as localized generation instability, which can be reliably detected via hypothesis testing. Experiments demonstrate that SLIM achieves ultra-low coverage capability, strong black-box verification performance, and great scalability while preserving both stealthiness and model utility, offering a robust solution for protecting training data in modern LLM pipelines.

Abstract:
Zero-shot Relational Learning (ZRL) aims to perform knowledge graph completion when dealing with newly emerging relations without instances of them. However, existing ZRL methods typically depend on external knowledge beyond Knowledge Graphs (KGs), resulting in increased annotation costs and limited practical applicability. To address this issue, we propose a new Structure-Aware paradigm for ZRL, termed SAZRL, that performs ZRL without relying on external knowledge. SAZRL leverages intrinsic structural patterns in KGs to bridge semantic correlations for new relations with existing ones. It constructs structure-aware conditional query graphs based on shared entities and adaptive relation updating module to generate representations for new relations based on the query graphs. We conduct extensive experiments on three real-world benchmarks, NELL-ZS, Wiki-ZS and FB15K-ZS, demonstrating that SAZRL consistently surpasses state-of-the-art ZRL methods, achieving up to 10.66% improvement in MRR while reducing annotation costs and enhancing practical applicability. The code and data are provided in supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have made progress in knowledge-intensive tasks, reasoning and planning, and collaborative problem solving, yet they exhibit intrinsic limitations such as knowledge cutoff, single-threaded reasoning that hinders finer-grained branch and aggregation, and rigid collaboration mechanisms that struggle to coordinate specialized capabilities. Graphs, with their ability to represent relational knowledge and complex dependencies, offer a natural means to address these limitations: they provide structured, high-density knowledge for augmenting or correcting LLMs’ generation; enable revisitable inference by organizing intermediate steps as graphs; and support dynamic coordination among experts or agents in collaborative settings. Motivated by these developments, we present the first systematic survey of graph-assisted LLMs from the perspective of how graph structures mitigate LLMs’ limitations. We introduce a taxonomy spanning Graph-Assisted Knowledge Augmentation, Graph-Assisted Reasoning and Planning, and Graph-Assisted LLM Collaboration, and analyze representative methods, summarize common design patterns, and outline open challenges and future directions for advancing LLMs with graph-based enhancements. The collected papers are available in [link here](https://github.com/FairyFali/Graph4LLM-Survey).

Abstract:
When reading foreign-language literature, non-native users often face significant challenges. Existing traditional machine translation systems tend to obscure or mistranslate key terminology, while paraphrasing aimed at lay readers often oversimplifies it, thereby hindering their ability to master domain-specific technical vocabulary. To bridge this gap, we first define a novel task, Glossing-Oriented Academic Translation (GOAT), which aims to produce translations dynamically adapted to a reader’s academic proficiency, or level. We then propose GlossaGen, a comprehensive framework to address this task. GlossaGen features two key innovations: a multi-agent data synthesis pipeline that leverages academic personas to automatically generate a large-scale, structured dataset with level-specific explanations; and a novel training strategy based on dynamic adapter merging, which balances task generalization with user-level specialization by combining a ”generalist” adapter with a fine-grained ”expert” one. We evaluate GlossaGen on our synthesized benchmark, where results from automatic metrics, large language model (LLM)-based assessments, and human evaluations consistently demonstrate that our approach achieves higher scores than strong baselines across most metrics. Our framework provides a scalable pathway to enhance the comprehensibility of scientific literature for non-native readers, delivering more accurate translations accompanied by pedagogically sound, level-specific term explanations, and we release our code and data to facilitate further research.

Abstract:
Long-context Large Language Models, despite their expanded capacity, require careful working memory management to mitigate attention dilution during long-horizon tasks. Yet existing approaches rely on external mechanisms that lack awareness of the agent’s reasoning state, leading to suboptimal decisions. We propose Memory-as-Action (MemAct), a framework that treats working memory management as learnable policy actions. By formulating context management as in-place editing operations (deletion, insertion), MemAct enables joint optimization of information retention and task performance through end-to-end reinforcement learning. To address the computational challenges of dynamic context updates, we introduce Dynamic Context Policy Optimization, which restores training efficiency without compromising reasoning integrity. Experiments show that MemAct-RL-14B matches the accuracy of models 16× larger while reducing average context length by 51%, with learned strategies that adapt to model capabilities and generalize across task complexities. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/ADaM-BJTU/MemAct.

Abstract:
Personalized Large Language Models (LLMs) facilitate more natural, human-like interactions in human-centric applications. However, existing personalization methods are constrained by limited controllability and high resource demands. Furthermore, their reliance on static personality modeling restricts adaptability across varying situations. To address these limitations, we first demonstrate the existence of situation-dependency and consistent situation-behavior patterns within LLM personalities through a multi-perspective analysis of persona neurons. Building on these insights, we propose IRIS, a training-free, neuron-based Identify–Retrieve–Steer framework for advanced situational personality steering. Our approach comprises situational persona neuron identification, situation-aware neuron retrieval, and similarity-weighted steering. We empirically validate our framework on PersonalityBench and our newly introduced SPBench, a comprehensive situational personality benchmark. Experimental results show that our method surpasses best-performing baselines, demonstrating IRIS’s generalization and robustness to complex, unseen situations and different models architecture.

Abstract:
Psychiatric narratives encode patient identity not only through explicit identifiers but also through idiosyncratic life events embedded in clinical structure. Existing de-identification approaches, including PHI masking and LLM-based synthetic rewriting, operate at the text level and offer limited control over which semantic elements are preserved or altered. We introduce Anonpsy , a de-identification framework that reformulates the task as graph-guided semantic rewriting. Anonpsy (1) converts each narrative into a semantic graph encoding clinical entities, temporal anchors, and typed relations; (2) applies graph-constrained perturbations that modify identifying context while preserving clinical structure; and (3) regenerates text via graph-conditioned LLM generation. Evaluated on 90 clinician-authored psychiatric case narratives, Anonpsy preserves diagnostic fidelity while achieving consistently low re-identification risk under expert, semantic, and GPT-5-based evaluations. Compared with a strong LLM-only rewriting baseline, Anonpsy yields substantially lower semantic similarity and identifiability. These results demonstrate that explicit structural representations combined with constrained generation provide an effective approach to de-identification for psychiatric narratives.

Abstract:
With the evolution of large language models (LLMs), their robustness against individual simple biases has been enhanced. However, we observe that the ensemble of multiple simple biases still exerts a significant adverse impact on LLMs. Given that real-world data samples are typically confounded by a wide range of biases, LLMs tend to exhibit unstable performance when deployed in high-stakes real-world scenarios such as clinical diagnosis and legal document analysis. However, previous benchmarks are constrained to datasets where each sample is manually injected with only one type of bias. To bridge this gap, we propose a multi-bias benchmark where each sample contains multiple types of biases. Experimental results reveal that existing LLMs and debiasing methods perform poorly on this benchmark, highlighting the challenge of eliminating such compounded biases.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as conversational partners for learning, yet the interactional dynamics supporting users’ learning and engagement are understudied. We analyze the linguistic and interactional features from both LLM and participant chats across 397 human–LLM conversations about socio-political issues to identify the mechanisms and conditions under which LLM explanations shape changes in political knowledge and confidence. Mediation analyses reveal that LLM explanatory richness partially supports confidence by fostering users’ reflective insight, whereas its effect on knowledge gain operates entirely through users’ cognitive engagement. Moderation analyses show that these effects are highly conditional and vary by political efficacy. Confidence gains depend on how high-efficacy users experience and resolve uncertainty. Knowledge gains depend on high-efficacy users’ ability to leverage extended interaction, with longer conversations benefiting primarily reflective users. In summary, we find that learning from LLMs is an interactional achievement, not a uniform outcome of better explanations. The findings underscore the importance of aligning LLM explanatory behavior with users’ engagement states to support effective learning in designing Human-AI interactive systems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at diverse tasks, but remain vulnerable to malicious inputs such as jailbreak attacks. Current one-size-fits-all safety guardrails built from static datasets ignore each model’s unique safety profile and often force trade-offs between safety and utility. To address this gap, we propose LS-Guard, a framework for learning model-specific guardrails tailored to each LLM’s vulnerabilities. LS-Guard operates in two stages: First, it dynamically profiles a given LLM by probing it with malicious prompts to elicit the model’s responses, which are then dynamically labeled to reveal model-specific failure modes. Second, it uses this data to train a safety classifier with a collaborative multi-LoRA architecture. An orthogonality-constrained multi-task loss enables a central expert to learn general safety features while each subject-specific expert encodes the distinctive vulnerability patterns of one LLM. During inference, LS-Guard activates the central expert together with its model-specific expert to perform content moderation, yielding reliable safety decisions. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world LLMs demonstrate that LS-Guard significantly outperforms strong baseline guardrails, achieving superior robustness, adaptability, and generalization.

Abstract:
While the massive scale of modern LLMs enables remarkable performance, their static, input-agnostic computational graph incurs substantial resource wastage and high latency during inference. Existing dynamic schemes, such as early-exit and layer-drop reduce FLOPs but break batch processing or introduce KV-cache inconsistency. We propose Deputy, a dynamic low-rank substitution framework that employs a lightweight decision module at each layer to dynamically determine the execution branch for different tokens: Attention layers choose between full and low-rank computation to mitigate the KV cache issue, while FFN layers additionally support skipping to further reduce computation. We fine-tune the LLM with LoRA and then derive an additional low-rank matrix C via a least-squares fit BC ≈ W pre , where B is the shared LoRA matrix, so that only one extra low-rank matrix is introduced, effectively reducing memory overhead. Moreover, a hybrid KV cache strategy stores KV values generated by the low-rank branch, achieving a 38% reduction in cache storage. Experiments on Llama models demonstrate that Deputy reduces computation by approximately 40% compared to the original dense model while outperforming existing baseline methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are often augmented with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, yet static “always-on” use is computationally wasteful. Existing adaptive methods typically optimize a single axis, overlooking that evidence need and reasoning depth are only partially correlated. We present , a dual-axis routing framework that separates retrieval necessity from reasoning necessity under a user-defined cost–quality trade-off. Offline, profiles four pipelines (Direct, RAG, CoT, RAG+CoT) and derives supervision by selecting the utility-maximizing strategy that trades answer quality against token usage and latency. Online, a compact dual-head router, conditioned on cost weights, uses lightweight probes—retrieval-score dispersion (NQC) and single-pass draft negative log-likelihood (NLL)—to decide whether to invoke RAG and/or CoT without sampling or model internals. Across six QA benchmarks, reduces token usage by up to 86% and latency by up to 84% while improving answer quality over strong baselines.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have empowered home assistants with natural language interaction capabilities. However, current assistants overlook the progressive omission that occurs in human dialogue as shared context accumulates, leading to more elliptical expressions for efficient communication. Thus, current assistants still struggle to interpret such elliptical expressions accurately, which limits their effectiveness in real-world applications. In practical smart home scenarios, assistants face two major challenges caused by elliptical commands: (1) referential ambiguity caused by different environmental expectations among multiple users; and (2) intention ambiguity resulting from user preferences that evolve over time or change with the environment. To address these challenges, we introduce PEC-Home, the first simulated home dataset specifically designed for interpreting progressively elliptical commands in smart homes. Extensive experiments on various LLMs, including GPT-4o, show that existing home assistants struggle to execute user-intended operations based solely on elliptical commands. Even when equipped with tools for storing and retrieving user dialogue history, execution accuracy remains below that achieved with complete commands. Our code and dataset will be publicly available.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has achieved remarkable progress in improving the fine-tuning efficiency and downstream performance of large language models (LLMs). Although prior work has recognized that different weight update matrices 𝛥 𝐖 exhibit varying importance and therefore should be allocated different ranks, parameters within the same update matrix are still typically constrained to a uniform rank configuration, neglecting fine-grained parameter-level heterogeneity. To address this limitation, we propose G-LoRA (Global-Local Decoupled LoRA), which decomposes each update matrix into global and local adapters. The key idea is to reorganize the rows and columns of the update matrix using a first-order Taylor approximation of parameter importance, such that highly influential parameters are clustered into a local sub-block of 𝛥 𝐖 . During training, the local adapter then focuses on this high-importance sub-region and is allocated a higher rank, whereas the global adapter captures the residual updates for the entire update matrix with relatively lower rank. By allocating higher representational capacity to more critical parameters, G-LoRA enables more efficient utilization of model resources. Extensive evaluations on benchmarks spanning commonsense reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and code generation demonstrate that G-LoRA achieves up to 2.7% absolute accuracy improvement over LoRA and its variants, validating its effectiveness for LLM fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has improved LLM reasoning, but models often generate explanations that appear coherent while containing unfaithful intermediate steps. Existing self-evaluation approaches are prone to inherent biases: the model may confidently endorse coherence even when the step-to-step implication is not valid, leading to unreliable faithfulness evaluation. We propose FACT-E, a causality-inspired framework for evaluating CoT quality. FACT-E uses controlled perturbations as an instrumental signal to separate genuine step-to-step dependence from bias-driven artifacts, producing more reliable faithfulness estimates ( intra-chain faithfulness ). To select trustworthy trajectories, FACT-E jointly considers intra-chain faithfulness and CoT-to-answer consistency , ensuring that selected chains are both faithful internally and supportive of the correct final answer. Experiments on GSM8K, MATH, and CommonsenseQA show that FACT-E improves reasoning-trajectory selection and yields stronger in-context learning exemplars. FACT-E also reliably detects flawed reasoning under noisy conditions, providing a robust metric for trustworthy LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success, their reliability in knowledge-intensive tasks is often compromised by factual hallucinations. Integrating Knowledge Graphs (KGs) addresses this issue; however, existing approaches typically rely on simple graph traversal.This paradigm decouples topological navigation from logical operations (e.g., temporal filtering, aggregation), leading to imprecise retrieval and heavy post-processing burdens.Although semantic parsing offers a solution by grounding reasoning in logical forms, it traditionally suffers from a dependency on scarce supervised annotations.To bridge this gap, we propose Interactive Semantic Parsing, a framework that formulates reasoning as the sequential generation of executable logical clauses. This design allows logical constraints to be dynamically interleaved with graph search, while optimizing via reinforcement learning with only final answer feedback eliminates the need for gold program annotations.To tackle the sparse reward challenge in the vast symbolic space, we introduce a distance-aware process reward to evaluate intermediate steps based on their topological proximity to the answer.Experimental results on WebQSP and CWQ demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly on complex queries, validating the effectiveness of our dense reward signal in enabling robust reasoning without supervision.Our code is available at https://github.com/NUSTM/ISP-KGR.

Abstract:
Agents based on large language models have recently shown strong potential on real-world software engineering (SWE) tasks that require long-horizon interaction with repository-scale codebases. However, most existing agents rely on append-only context maintenance or passively triggered compression heuristics, which often lead to context explosion, semantic drift, and degraded reasoning in long-running interactions. We propose Cat, a new context management paradigm that elevates context maintenance to a callable tool integrated into the decision-making process of agents. Cat formalizes a structured context workspace consisting of stable task semantics, condensed long-term memory, and high-fidelity short-term interactions, and enables agents to proactively compress historical trajectories into actionable summaries at appropriate milestones. To support context management for SWE-agents, we propose a trajectory-level supervision framework, CaT-Generator, based on an offline data construction pipeline that injects context-management actions into complete interaction trajectories. Using this framework, we train a context-aware model, SWE-Compressor. Experiments on SWE-Bench-Verified demonstrate that SWE-Compressor reaches a 57.6% solved rate and significantly outperforms ReAct-based agents and static compression baselines, while maintaining stable and scalable long-horizon reasoning under a bounded context budget.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) enable sophisticated reasoning over images and videos, yet their inference is hindered by a systemic efficiency barrier known as visual token dominance. This overhead is driven by a multi-regime interplay between high-resolution feature extraction, quadratic attention scaling, and memory bandwidth constraints. We present a systematic taxonomy of efficiency techniques structured around the inference lifecycle, consisting of encoding, prefilling, and decoding. Unlike prior reviews focused on isolated optimizations, we analyze the end-to-end pipeline to reveal how upstream decisions dictate downstream bottlenecks, covering compute-bound visual encoding, the intensive prefilling of massive contexts, and the ”visual memory wall” in bandwidth-bound decoding. By decoupling the efficiency landscape into the axes of shaping information density, managing long-context attention, and overcoming memory limits, this work provides a structured analysis of how isolated optimizations compose to navigate the trade-off between visual fidelity and system efficiency. The survey concludes by outlining four future frontiers supported by pilot empirical insights, including hybrid compression based on functional unit sensitivity, modality-aware decoding with relaxed verification, progressive state management for streaming continuity, and stage-disaggregated serving through hardware-algorithm co-design. The submitted software contains a snapshot of our literature repository, which is designed to be maintained as a living resource for the community.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle with the "lost-in-the-middle" problem, where critical information located in the middle of long-context inputs is often underrepresented or lost. While existing methods attempt to address this by combining multi-scale rotary position embeddings (RoPE), they typically suffer from high latency or rely on suboptimal hand-crafted scaling strategies. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a layer-specific positional embedding scaling (LPES) method that assigns distinct scaling factors to each layer. LPES achieves a more balanced attention distribution without fine-tuning model parameters or increasing inference delay. A specially designed genetic algorithm is employed to efficiently select the optimal scaling factors for each layer by incorporating B’ e zier curves to significantly reduce the search space. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LPES effectively mitigates positional attention bias and delivers consistent improvements across multiple long-context benchmarks, yielding up to an 11.2% accuracy gain on the key-value retrieval dataset.

Abstract:
Despite their strong reasoning capabilities and extensive world knowledge, Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently generate plans that violate task constraints, undermining their reliability in real-world applications. This deficiency arises from a lack of systematic mechanisms to incorporate constraint information during the generation process. While existing approaches attempt to mitigate this by relying on external tools or task decomposition, they fail to enhance the model’s intrinsic constraint awareness. To address this, we propose Constraint-Aware Reinforcement Learning (CARL), a novel RL framework designed to strengthen LLMs’ intrinsic focus on constraints. CARL introduces a constraint-aware reward by comparing the model’s output distributions under constrained and unconstrained inputs, encouraging constraint focus and penalizing neglect.Compatible with various RL frameworks and requiring no external solvers or top models, CARL enables scalable, end-to-end constraint-aware planning. Extensive experiments on BlocksWorld, TravelPlanner, and T-Eval demonstrate that CARL significantly outperforms standard Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) baselines and state-of-the-art reasoning models, exhibiting a markedly increased focus on constraints.

Abstract:
Multi-agent systems utilizing large language models often assign authoritative roles to improve performance, yet the impact of authority bias on agent interactions remains underexplored. We present the first systematic analysis of role-based authority bias in free-form multi-agent evaluation using ChatEval. Applying French and Raven’s power-based theory, we classify authoritative roles into legitimate, referent, and expert types and analyze their influence across 12-turn conversations. Experiments with GPT-4o and DeepSeek R1 reveal that Expert and Referent power roles exert stronger influence than Legitimate power roles. Crucially, authority bias emerges not through active conformity by general agents, but through authoritative roles consistently maintaining their positions while general agents demonstrate flexibility. Furthermore, authority influence requires clear position statements, as neutral responses fail to generate bias. These findings provide key insights for designing multi-agent frameworks with asymmetric interaction patterns.

Abstract:
Traditional recommendation systems represent users and items as dense vectors and learn to align them in a shared latent space for relevance estimation. Recent LLM-based recommenders instead leverage natural-language representations that are easier to interpret and integrate with downstream reasoning modules. This paper studies how to construct effective textual profiles for users and items, and how to align them for recommendation.A central difficulty is that the best profile format is not known a priori: manually designed templates can be brittle and misaligned with task objectives. Moreover, generating user and item profiles independently may produce descriptions that are individually plausible yet semantically inconsistent for a specific user–item pair. We propose Duet, an interaction-aware profile generator that jointly produces user and item profiles conditioned on both user history and item evidence. Duet follows a three-stage procedure: it first turns raw histories and metadata into compact cues, then expands these cues into paired profile prompts and then generate profiles, and finally optimizes the generation policy with reinforcement learning using downstream recommendation performance as feedback. Experiments on three real-world datasets show that Duet consistently outperforms strong baselines, demonstrating the benefits of template-free profile exploration and joint user–item textual alignment. Project page: https://duet-rec.github.io/.

Abstract:
Understanding and controlling the behavior of large language models (LLMs) is an increasingly important topic in multilingual NLP. Beyond prompting or fine-tuning, language steering , i.e., manipulating internal representations during inference, has emerged as a more efficient and interpretable technique for adapting models to a target language. Yet, no dedicated benchmarks or evaluation protocols exist to quantify the effectiveness of steering techniques. We introduce CLaS-Bench , a lightweight parallel-question benchmark for evaluating language-forcing behavior in LLMs across 32 languages, enabling systematic evaluation of multilingual steering methods. We evaluate a broad array of steering techniques, including residual-stream DiffMean interventions, probe-derived directions, language-specific neurons, PCA/LDA vectors, Sparse Autoencoders, and prompting baselines. Steering performance is measured along two axes: language control and semantic relevance, combined into a single harmonic-mean steering score. We find that across languages simple residual-based DiffMean method consistently outperforms all other methods. Moreover, a layer-wise analysis reveals that language-specific structure emerges predominantly in later layers and steering directions cluster based on language family. CLaS-Bench is the first standardized benchmark for multilingual steering, enabling both rigorous scientific analysis of language representations and practical evaluation of steering as a low-cost adaptation alternative.

Abstract:
Generative retrieval directly decode a document identifier (i.e., docid) in response to a query, making it impossible to provide users with explanations as an answer for “why is this document retrieved?”. To address this limitation, we propose Hierarchical Category Path-Enhanced Generative Retrieval (HyPE), which enhances explainability by first generating hierarchical category paths step-by-step then decoding docid. By leveraging hierarchical category paths which progress from broader to more specific semantic categories, HyPE can provide detailed explanation for its retrieval decision. For training, HyPE constructs category paths with external high-quality semantic hierarchy, leverages LLM to select appropriate candidate paths for each document, and optimizes the generative retrieval model with path-augmented dataset. During inference, HyPE utilizes path-aware ranking strategy to aggregate diverse topic information, allowing the most relevant documents to be prioritized in the final ranked list of docids. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that HyPE not only offers a high level of explainability but also improves the retrieval performance. We provide the code and a live demo of HyPE at https://augustinlib.github.io/HyPE/

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at generalized reasoning, standard retrieval-augmented approaches fail to address the disconnected nature of long-term agentic memory. To bridge this gap, we introduce Synapse (Synergistic Associative Processing Semantic Encoding), a unified memory architecture that transcends static vector similarity. Drawing from cognitive science, Synapse models memory as a dynamic graph where relevance emerges from spreading activation rather than pre-computed links. By integrating lateral inhibition and temporal decay, the system dynamically highlights relevant sub-graphs while filtering interference. We implement a Triple Hybrid Retrieval strategy that fuses geometric embeddings with activation-based graph traversal. Extensive evaluations on the LoCoMo benchmark show that Synapse significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in complex temporal and multi-hop reasoning tasks, offering a robust solution to the "Contextual Tunneling" problem.

Abstract:
The interpretation of implicit meanings is an integral aspect of human communication. However, this framework may not transfer to interactions with Large Language Models (LLMs). To investigate this, we introduce the task of Implicit Information Extraction (IIE) and propose an LLM-based IIE pipeline that builds a structured knowledge graph from a context sentence by extracting relational triplets, validating implicit inferences, and analyzing temporal relations. We evaluate two LLMs against crowdsourced human judgments on two datasets. We find that humans agree with most model triplets yet consistently propose many additions, indicating limited coverage in current LLM-based IIE. Moreover, in our experiments, models appear to be more conservative about implicit inferences than humans in socially rich contexts, whereas humans become more conservative in shorter, fact-oriented contexts. Our code is available at https://github.com/Antonio-Dee/IIE_from_LLM.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based conversational recommender systems (CRSs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in capturing user preferences and generating contextually relevant recommendations. Nevertheless, the recommendation quality of the models frozen after training inevitably degrades under contextual shifts, such as changes in language and social trends. While periodic model updates are essential to maintain alignment with real-world preferences, training on large-scale data incurs substantial costs. This motivates data-efficient adaptation. However, existing data selection methods struggle to distinguish learnable samples under contextual shifts. To address this, we propose Contextual Shift-Adaptive Data Pruning and Training (CAPT), a framework agnostic to underlying LLM-based CRSs. Specifically, we conceptualize a three-class data taxonomy comprising familiar, valuable, and outlier samples to formalize data behavior under contextual shifts. Based on this taxonomy, we design an importance score estimation scheme that quantifies a sample’s relative learnability for shift adaptation. Leveraging these importance scores, CAPT prioritizes highly learnable samples and further guides shift-adaptive training to actively steer the model toward evolving preferences. Experiments on three CRS benchmarks with real-world temporal splits demonstrate that CAPT outperforms baselines, matching or surpassing full-data fine-tuning performance using only 10-50% of the training data.

Abstract:
Numerical precision is critical in financial NLP, yet embedding-based semantic similarity metrics exhibit numerical blindness—failing to distinguish contradictory values within similar contexts. We introduce NASH (Numerically Aware Scoring Hueristic), a model-agnostic metric that decouples numerical verification from textual semantic evaluation through a three-stage pipeline: (1) modal separation via numeric masking, (2) dual-channel similarity estimation through masked-text similarity and context-aware numeric alignment, and (3) IDF-weighted aggregation. NASH functions as a drop-in enhancement to existing embedding-based metrics. Validated on our proposed NumFinE financial numerical evaluation benchmark and established semantic similarity datasets (STS-B, Financial-STS), NASH achieves substantial improvements in numerical sensitivity (up to +159.6% on listwise ranking) while preserving general semantic performance, establishing a reliable standard for numeracy-aware evaluation.

Abstract:
Recent commercial systems such as Suno demonstrate strong capabilities in long-form song generation, while academic research remains largely non-reproducible due to the lack of publicly available training data, hindering fair comparison and progress. To this end, we release a fully open-source system for long-form song generation with fine-grained style conditioning, including a licensed synthetic dataset, training and evaluation pipelines, and Muse, an easy-to-deploy song generation model. The dataset consists of 116k fully licensed synthetic songs with automatically generated lyrics and style descriptions paired with audio synthesized by SunoV5. We train Muse via single-stage supervised finetuning of a Qwen-based language model extended with discrete audio tokens using MuCodec, without task-specific losses, auxiliary objectives, or additional architectural components. Our evaluations find that although Muse is trained with a modest data scale and model size, it achieves competitive performance on phoneme error rate, text–music style similarity, and audio aesthetic quality, while enabling controllable segment-level generation across different musical structures. All data, model weights, and training and evaluation pipelines will be publicly released, paving the way for continued progress in controllable long-form song generation research.

Abstract:
Tabular data is a fundamental component of real-world information systems. However, existing multilingual table benchmarks suffer from geolinguistic imbalance - overrepresenting certain languages and lacking sufficient scale for rigorous cross-lingual analysis. To address these limitations, we introduce M3TQA, which is a comprehensive framework for massively multilingual multitask table question answering, including subsequent datasets M3TQA-BENCH and M3TQA-INSTRUCT, featuring tables expanded to 97 languages from Chinese and English sources. M3TQA-BENCH includes 6,606 professionally annotated question-answering pairs across four tasks designed to evaluate nuanced table reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we synthesized the training set M3TQA-INSTRUCT in 97 languages using Large Language Model (LLM). Experiments on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal critical insights into cross-lingual generalization, demonstrating that synthetically generated, unannotated training data can significantly boost performance, particularly for low-resource languages. M3TQA establishes a new standard for multilingual table understanding, providing both a challenging evaluation platform and a scalable methodology for future research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from pure text generators into interactive agents capable of invoking external tools. However, LLM agents still struggle with goal-oriented queries, which require decomposing high-level objectives into sequences of interdependent API calls with accurate planning and execution. Current approaches rely on zero-shot evaluation due to the absence of training data; while proprietary models such as GPT-4 exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, smaller open-source models remain ineffective at complex tool use. To address this limitation, we propose a novel training framework GOAT, that enables fine-tuning LLM agents without human annotation. GOAT automatically synthesizes goal-oriented API execution data from API documents using a novel call-first generation paradigm, that constructs training data based on executed API call sequences. Through extensive experiments, we show that GOAT-trained agents achieve state-of-the-art performance across multiple existing goal-oriented benchmarks. In addition, we introduce GOATBench, a new goal-oriented API execution benchmark, and demonstrate that agents trained with GOAT also excel in this setting. These results highlight GOAT as a practical path toward building robust open-source LLM agents capable of complex reasoning and tool use.

Abstract:
Recent large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive reasoning milestones but continue to struggle with high computational costs, logical inconsistencies, and sharp performance degradation on high-complexity problems. While neuro-symbolic methods attempt to mitigate these issues by coupling LLMs with symbolic reasoners, existing approaches typically rely on monotonic logics (e.g., SMT) that cannot represent defeasible reasoning—essential components of human cognition. We present "LLM+ASP," a framework that translates natural language into Answer Set Programming (ASP), a nonmonotonic formalism based on stable model semantics. Unlike prior LLM+ASP approaches that require manually authored knowledge modules, domain-specific prompts, or evaluation restricted to single problem classes, our framework operates without any per-task engineering and applies uniformly across diverse reasoning tasks. Our system utilizes an automated self-correction loop where structured feedback from the ASP solver enables iterative refinement. Evaluating across six diverse benchmarks, we demonstrate that: (1) stable model semantics allow LLMs to naturally express default rules and exceptions, outperforming SMT-based alternatives by significant margins on nonmonotonic tasks; (2) iterative self-correction is the primary driver of performance, effectively replacing the need for handcrafted domain knowledge; (3) compact in-context reference guides substantially outperform verbose documentation, revealing a “context rot" phenomenon where excessive context hinders constraint adherence.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as reasoning engines in autonomous driving, yet their decision-making remains opaque. We propose to study their decision process through counterfactual explanations, which identify the minimal semantic changes to a scene description required to alter a driving plan.We introduce DRIV-EX, a method that leverages gradient-based optimization on continuous embeddings to identify the input shifts required to flip the model’s decision. Crucially, to avoid the incoherent text typical of unconstrained continuous optimization, DRIV-EX uses these optimized embeddings solely as a semantic guide: they are used to bias a controlled decoding process that re-generates the original scene description. This approach effectively steers the generation toward the counterfactual target while guaranteeing the linguistic fluency, domain validity, and proximity to the original input essential for interpretability.Evaluated using the LC-LLM planner on the textual highD dataset, DRIV-EX generates valid, fluent counterfactuals more reliably than existing baselines. It successfully exposes latent biases and provides concrete insights to improve the robustness of LLM-based driving agents. The code is available at "https://github.com/Amaia-CARDIEL/DRIV_EX".

Abstract:
Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) is a critical strategy for efficient large language models (LLMs) deployment. However, existing scaling laws primarily focus on general performance, overlooking crucial fine-grained factors and how quantization differentially impacts diverse knowledge capabilities. To address this, we establish Task-Stratified Knowledge Scaling Laws. By stratifying capabilities into memorization, application, and reasoning, we develop a framework that unifies model size, bit-width, and fine-grained factors: group size and calibration set size. Validated on 293 diverse PTQ configurations, our framework demonstrates strong fit and cross-architecture consistency. It reveals distinct sensitivities across knowledge capabilities: reasoning is precision-critical, application is scale-responsive, and memorization is calibration-sensitive. We highlight that in low-bit scenarios, optimizing these fine-grained factors is essential for preventing performance collapse. These findings provide an empirically-backed foundation for designing knowledge-aware quantization strategies.

Abstract:
Long-horizon agents face the challenge of growing context size during interaction with environment, which degrades the performance and stability. Existing methods typically introduce the external memory module and look up the relevant information from the stored memory, which prevents the model itself from proactively managing its memory content and aligning with the agent’s overarching task objectives. To address these limitations, we propose the self-memory policy optimization algorithm (MemPO), which enables the agent (policy model) to autonomously summarize and manage their memory during interaction with environment. By improving the credit assignment mechanism based on memory effectiveness, the policy model can selectively retain crucial information, significantly reducing token consumption while preserving task performance. Extensive experiments and analyses confirm that MemPO achieves absolute F1 score gains of 25.98 over the base model and 7.1 over the previous SOTA baseline, while reducing token usage by 67.58% and 73.12%.

Abstract:
As academic submissions grow, the traditional peer review process struggles to keep up, raising concerns about quality and fairness.A trend of using large language models (LLMs) for assistance has emerged.In this work, we take a critical step toward improving the quality of LLM-generated reviews.We propose the PeerCheck framework, which investigates LLM-human review differences ( RQ1 ) and explores methods to increase LLM-human similarity ( RQ2 ).We first analyzed the human-written reviews with reviews generated by GPT-4o, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-V3 and found that LLMs and humans focus on different terms, e.g., LLMs prioritize theory while humans emphasize methodology and experiments.We further adopt prompt engineering, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and utilize retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to enhance the LLM-generated reviews towards human-level quality.We find CoT significantly improves the human similarity of LLM reviews, while we also discover an unexpected “RAG paradox,” i.e., experiments with RAG produce different results for various LLMs and, in some cases, even reduce review quality.Our comprehensive analysis of LLM-generated academic reviews illustrates both possibilities and limitations, contributing to a more effective, human-aligned review system.

Abstract:
Metaphorical text expresses meaning through cross-domain mappings rather than literal surface content, which makes it difficult for text-to-image systems to generate semantically faithful images. We propose CMIG, a structured prompting framework inspired by Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). CMIG identifies source–target mappings, filters projectable source attributes, and selects a visual realization strategy in a reproducible reasoning workflow. Experiments on DALL ⋅ E 3, Imagen 2, and FLUX-1 show that CMIG consistently improves semantic alignment and yields a better overall balance of human-rated metaphor quality, visual coherence, and controllability on metaphorical prompts. To support systematic evaluation, we also construct a 3 , 500-instance visual metaphor benchmark.

Abstract:
Detecting medical conditions from speech acoustics is fundamentally a weakly-supervised learning problem: a single, often noisy, session-level label must be linked to nuanced patterns within a long, complex audio recording. This task is further hampered by severe data scarcity and the subjective nature of clinical annotations. While semi-supervised learning (SSL) offers a viable path to leverage unlabeled data, existingaudio methods often fail to address the core challenge that pathological traits are not uniformly expressed in a patient’s speech. We propose a novel, audio-only SSL framework that explicitly models this hierarchy by jointly learning from frame-level, segment-level, and session-level representations within unsegmented clinical dialogues. Our end-to-end approach dynamically aggregates these multi-granularity features and generates high-quality pseudo-labels to efficiently utilize unlabeled data. Extensive experiments show the framework is model-agnostic, robust across languages and conditions, and highly data-efficient—achieving, for instance, 90% of fully-supervised performance using only 11 labeled samples. This work provides a principled approach to learning from weak, far-end supervision in medical speech analysis.The code is available at https://github.com/fispresent/semi_pathological.

Abstract:
Scaling test-time compute through extended chains of thought has become a dominant paradigm for improving large language model reasoning. However, existing research implicitly assumes that longer thinking always yields better results. This assumption remains largely unexamined. We systematically investigate how the marginal utility of additional reasoning tokens changes as compute budgets increase. We find that marginal returns diminish substantially at higher budgets and that models exhibit overthinking, where extended reasoning is associated with abandoning previously correct answers. Furthermore, we show that optimal thinking length varies across problem difficulty, suggesting that uniform compute allocation is suboptimal. Our cost-aware evaluation framework reveals that stopping at moderate budgets can reduce computation significantly while maintaining comparable accuracy.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has propelled Large Language Models in complex reasoning, yet its scalability is often hindered by a training bottleneck where performance plateaus as policy entropy collapses, signaling a loss of exploration. While previous methods attempt to maintain high entropy, we argue that unselective entropy maximization risks amplifying irrelevant noise rather than fostering meaningful exploration. In this paper, we identify a deeper issue: the gradual elimination of valuable low-probability exploratory tokens, which we term reasoning sparks, driven by RLVR over-penalization. To address this, we introduce Low-probability Regularization (Lp-Reg). Leveraging the statistical distinction where reasoning sparks exhibit higher probabilities than noise, Lp-Reg filters out the extremely low-probability noise tokens and prevents the suppression of potentially valuable low-probability candidates. Experiments demonstrate that Lp-Reg enables stable on-policy training for over 3,000 steps (81,204 GPU-hours), sustaining exploration in regimes where baselines typically collapse. Validated across extensive evaluations totaling over 300,000 cumulative GPU-hours, Lp-Reg demonstrates highly competitive performance in off-policy settings and consistently achieves state-of-the-art results in on-policy training across diverse model families, sizes, and domains, with relative accuracy improvements ranging from 3.06% to 7.98%.

Abstract:
Scientific reasoning, the process through which humans apply logic, evidence, and critical thinking to explore and interpret scientific phenomena, is essential in advancing knowledge reasoning across diverse fields. However, despite significant progress, current scientific reasoning models still struggle with generalization across domains and often fall short of multimodal perception. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which integrate text, images, and other modalities, present an exciting opportunity to overcome these limitations and enhance scientific reasoning. Therefore, this position paper argues that MLLMs can significantly advance scientific reasoning across disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology. We highlight the current state of MLLM applications in scientific reasoning, noting their ability to integrate and reason over diverse data types. However, challenges such as multimodal alignment, data diversity, and reasoning depth remain obstacles to achieving their full potential. To address these challenges, we propose actionable suggestions in the near future. Overall, our work offers a novel perspective on MLLM integration with scientific reasoning, providing the LLM community with valuable insights for achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

Abstract:
Adversarial attacks have attracted growing attention across domains, including natural language processing (NLP). Character-level adversarial attacks preserve semantics, but they have received less attention because the discrete operations they use are costly and inefficient. Challenging these beliefs, we introduce two adaptively learnable matrices that transform discrete choices into continuous representations, enabling automatic one-shot multi-position, multi-character insertion. To optimize the two learnable matrices, we propose OSCR-Attack, an end-to-end framework based on gradient-based optimization, with a conflict resolution strategy that maps the optimized continuous distributions back into discrete insertion operations. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks with three open-source large language models (LLMs) show that OSCR-Attack improves attack success rate (ASR) by up to 21.45% points and accelerates the attack by up to 3.66 times compared to recent baselines.

Abstract:
This paper studies how empirical dialogue-flow statistics can be incorporated into Next Dialogue Act Prediction (NDAP). A KL regularization term is proposed that aligns predicted act distributions with corpus-derived transition patterns. Evaluated on a 60-class German counselling taxonomy using 5-fold cross-validation, this improves macro-F1 by 9–42% relative depending on encoder and substantially improves dialogue-flow alignment. Cross-dataset validation on HOPE suggests that improvements transfer across languages and counselling domains. In systematic ablations across pretrained encoders and architectures, the findings indicate that transition regularization provides consistent gains and disproportionately benefits weaker baseline models. The results suggest that lightweight discourse-flow priors complement pretrained encoders, especially in fine-grained, data-sparse dialogue tasks.

Abstract:
Traditional topic modeling treats each document as a single, coherent unit of topic, which can cause topic contamination when documents cover multiple topics. This becomes especially problematic when stakeholders are interested in identifying documents that focus on a specific topic. We introduce segment-based topic allocation, a novel paradigm that redefines topic assignment at the level of segments, coherent textual spans conveying distinct topical content. This granularity improves topic purity, interpretability, and applicability to multi-theme corpora such as reviews or survey responses. To support this paradigm, we construct SemEval-STM, a benchmark derived from aspect-based sentiment datasets, where segments are automatically extracted using large language models (LLMs) and post-processed with human supervision. We further propose the segment intrusion task (SIT), a novel evaluation method extending word intrusion to the span level, enabling human-centric assessment of topical coherence. Empirical results across diverse metrics and models demonstrate that SBTA significantly outperforms traditional document-based methods in clustering and interpretability. Our framework provides a practical and scalable solution for fine-grained topic analysis in heterogeneous text corpora.

Abstract:
Subjective NLP datasets typically aggregate annotator judgments into a single gold label, making it difficult to diagnose whether disagreement reflects unclear criteria, collapsed distinctions, or legitimate plurality. We propose a schema-level diagnostic for auditing expert-designed annotation schemas prior to gold-label commitment, using only multi-annotator criterion judgments. The diagnostic separates two failure modes: unstable criteria with hard-to-operationalize boundaries, and systematic overlap that blurs the boundaries between mutually exclusive categories. Applied to persuasive value extraction in commercial documents, we find that disagreement is not diffuse: instability concentrates in a few criteria, while nearly half of covered sentences activate multiple categories. These signals align with where domain experts disagree, yielding an evidence-based audit for tightening guidelines, revising category structure, or reconsidering the annotation paradigm.

Abstract:
LLM role-playing, i.e., using large language models (LLMs) to simulate specific personas, has emerged as a key capability in various applications, such as companionship, content creation, and digital games. While current models effectively capture character tones and knowledge, simulating the inner thoughts behind their behaviors remains a non-trivial challenge. Towards cognitive simulation in LLM role-play, previous efforts have mainly suffered from two critical deficiencies: the lack of high-quality datasets with explicit reasoning traces and the absence of reliable reward signals aligned with human preferences. In this paper, we propose HER (Human Emulation Reasoning), a unified framework for cognitive-level persona simulation. HER introduces a dual-layer thinking mechanism that strictly distinguishes characters’ first-person thinking processes from LLMs’ third-person reasoning. To bridge the aforementioned gaps, we curate a reasoning-augmented role-playing dataset via a reverse engineering strategy for supervised learning, and construct human-aligned evaluation principles and preference-based reward models for role-play reinforcement learning. Leveraging these resources, we train HER models based on the Qwen3-32B backbone via a hybrid paradigm of supervised learning (SL) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, our models significantly outperform the Qwen3-32B baseline, achieving a 30.26% on the CoSER benchmark and a 14.97% on the MiniMax Benchmark. Our datasets, evaluation principles, and trained models will be released to facilitate future research in cognitive-level LLM role-playing.

Abstract:
Despite progress in watermarking algorithms for large language models (LLMs), real-world deployment remains limited. We argue that this gap stems from misaligned incentives among LLM providers, platforms, and end users, which manifest as three key barriers: competitive risk, detection-tool governance, and attribution issues. We revisit three classes of watermarking through this lens. Model watermarking naturally aligns with LLM provider interests, yet faces new challenges in open-source ecosystems. LLM text watermarking offers modest provider benefit when framed solely as an anti-misuse tool, but can gain traction in narrowly scoped settings such as dataset de-contamination or user-controlled provenance. In-context watermarking (ICW) is tailored for trusted parties, such as conference organizers or educators, who embed hidden watermarking instructions into documents. If a dishonest reviewer or student submits this text to an LLM, the output carries a detectable watermark indicating misuse. This setup aligns incentives: users experience no quality loss, trusted parties gain a detection tool, and LLM providers remain neutral by simply following watermark instructions. We advocate for a broader exploration of incentive-aligned methods, with ICW as an example, in domains where trusted parties need reliable tools to detect misuse. More broadly, we distill design principles for incentive-aligned, domain-specific watermarking and outline future research directions. Our position is that the practical adoption of LLM watermarking requires aligning stakeholder incentives in targeted application domains and fostering active community engagement.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling (TTS) has gained widespread attention for enhancing LLM reasoning. Existing approaches such as Best-of-N and majority voting are limited as their performance depends on the quality of candidate responses, making them unable to produce a correct solution when all candidates are incorrect. Parallel self-refinement, generating multiple candidates and synthesizing a refined answer conditioned on them, offers a promising alternative, but the underlying mechanism driving its effectiveness remains obscure. To bridge this gap in understanding, we introduce a new metric, the Refinement Gap, designed to quantify the relative improvement of self-refinement beyond majority voting. We show that the Refinement Gap exhibits a clear scaling trend with model size and is only weakly correlated with the base capability. Based on this discovery, we propose Generative Self-Refinement (GSR), a parallel test-time scaling framework that transfers the refinement policy from larger teacher models with higher refinement gap into smaller students. Crucially, GSR jointly trains a single model to generate strong candidates and refine a better final answer based on these candidates. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance across five mathematical benchmarks over other parallel aggregation methods, while the learned refinement skill transfers across multiple model scales and families and exhibits robust generalization to an out-of-distribution domain.

Abstract:
Geo-localization aims to infer the geographic origin of a given signal. In computer vision, geo-localization has served as a demanding benchmark for compositional reasoning and is relevant to public safety. In contrast, progress on audio geo-localization has been constrained by the lack of high-quality audio-location pairs. To address this gap, we introduce AGL1K, the first audio geo-localization benchmark for audio language models (ALMs), spanning 72 countries and territories. To extract reliably localizable samples from a crowd-sourced platform, we propose the Audio Localizability metric that quantifies the informativeness of each recording, yielding 1,444 curated audio clips. Evaluations on 16 ALMs show that ALMs have emerged with audio geo-localization capability. We find that closed-source models substantially outperform open-source models, and that linguistic clues often dominate as a scaffold for prediction. We further analyze ALMs’ reasoning traces, regional bias, error causes, and the interpretability of the localizability metric. Overall, AGL1K establishes a benchmark for audio geo-localization and may advance ALMs with better geospatial reasoning capability.

Abstract:
Recent theory suggests Transformers are inherently succinct, capable of representing recursive algorithms like binary counting over exponential state spaces using constant-size circuits, unlike the exponential bottleneck of RNNs. However, it remains unclear under what conditions gradient-trained Transformers converge to these predicted succinct circuits, or whether they settle for heuristics. We bridge this gap by rigorously testing the Succinctness Hypothesis via mechanistic interpretability on the LargeCounter task. We report a striking dichotomy: shallow Transformers ( d=64 ) generalize perfectly, whereas massive LSTM baselines ( d=2048 ) fail completely ( <6% accuracy), empirically validating the succinctness gap. This dichotomy extends to modern state-space models: Mamba and Mamba-2 fail even more catastrophically ( <1.1% ), confirming the hierarchy Transformer ≫ LSTM > SSM predicted by formal complexity results. We show this capability is acquired via a grokking phase transition driven by a weight-norm "complexity collapse". Mechanistic analysis reveals the learned circuit aligns precisely with Boolean RASP theory: attention heads utilize Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE) for "Same-Bit Lookup", while MLPs act as exact XOR/AND logic gates. Furthermore, we detect analogous "Arithmetic Heads" in pre-trained LLMs (Pythia), suggesting that succinctness is a representational inductive bias that, when activated by sufficient regularization, governs how models learn algorithmic reasoning.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective in enhancing LLMs’ short-context reasoning but falters in long-context scenarios requiring precise grounding and multi-hop reasoning. We identify the "almost-there" phenomenon—trajectories that are largely correct but fail at the final step—in long-context reasoning RL and attribute this failure to two factors: (1) the lack of high reasoning density in long-context QA data, and (2) indiscriminate penalization of partially correct trajectories during long-context RL. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose DeepReasonQA, a KG-driven synthesis framework that controllably constructs high-difficulty, multi-hop long-context QA pairs with inherent reasoning chains. Building on this, we introduce Long-context Process Advantage Shaping (LongPAS), a simple yet effective method that performs fine-grained credit assignment by measuring reasoning steps along Validity and Relevance dimensions, which captures critical signals from "almost-there" trajectories. Experiments on three long-context reasoning benchmarks show that our approach substantially outperforms RLVR baselines and matches frontier LLMs while using far fewer parameters. Further analysis confirms the effectiveness of our methods in strengthening long-context reasoning while maintaining stable RL training.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for Islamic question answering, where ungrounded responses may carry serious religious consequences. Yet standard MCQ/MRC-style evaluations do not capture key real-world failure modes, notably free-form hallucinations and the ability to abstain when evidence is insufficient. To address this gap, we introduce IslamicFaithQA, a 3,810-item bilingual (Arabic/English) generative benchmark with atomic single-gold answers, which enables direct measurement of hallucination and abstention. We additionally developed an end-to-end grounded Islamic modeling suite consisting of (i) 25K Arabic text-grounded SFT reasoning pairs, (ii) 5K bilingual preference samples for reward-guided alignment, and (iii) a verse-level Qur’an retrieval corpus of ∼ 6k atomic verses (ayat). Building on these resources, we develop an agentic Quran-grounding framework (agentic RAG) that uses structured tool calls for iterative evidence seeking and answer revision. Experiments across Arabic-centric and multilingual LLMs show that retrieval improves correctness and that agentic RAG yields the largest gains beyond standard RAG, achieving state-of-the-art performance and stronger Arabic–English robustness even with a small model (i.e., Qwen3 4B). We made the datasets are publicly available (https://huggingface.co/datasets/QCRI/IslamicFaithQA).

Abstract:
Cooking recipes are complex procedures that require not only a fluent and factual text, but also accurate timing, temperature, and procedural coherence, as well as the correct composition of ingredients. Standard training procedures are primarily based on cross-entropy and focus solely on fluency. Building on RECIPE-NLG, we investigate the use of several composite objectives and present a new topological loss that represents ingredient lists as point clouds in embedding space, minimizing the divergence between predicted and gold ingredients. Using both standard NLG metrics and recipe-specific metrics, we find that our loss significantly improves ingredient- and action-level metrics. Meanwhile, the Dice loss excels in time/temperature precision, and the mixed loss yields competitive trade-offs with synergistic gains in quantity and time. A human preference analysis supports our finding, showing our model is preferred in 62% of the cases.

Abstract:
Modern language models demonstrate impressive coding capabilities in common programming languages (PLs), such as C++ and Python, but their performance in lower-resource PLs is often limited by training data availability. In principle, however, most programming skills are universal across PLs, so the capability acquired in one PL should transfer to others. In this work, we propose the task of zero-shot cross-programming-language transfer for code RL. We find that, for Llama-3.1, RL training for code generation in a source PL fails to improve, and sometimes even degrades, the performance on other target PLs. To address this, we hypothesize that effective RL transfer requires a generalizable SFT initialization before RL. We thus propose Parallel-SFT, an SFT strategy that incorporates "parallel programs"—functionally equivalent code implemented in multiple PLs—into the data mixture. We demonstrate that this improves transferability: when we subsequently perform RL on our Parallel-SFT model, we observe better generalization to unseen PLs. Analysis of the model internal representations reveals that Parallel-SFT leads to a more functionality-centric latent space, where equivalent programs across PLs are more tightly clustered, which we hypothesize to contribute to the improved transferability.

Abstract:
Personalized agents that interact with users over long periods must maintain persistent memory across sessions and update it as circumstances change. However, existing benchmarks predominantly frame long-term memory evaluation as fact retrieval from past conversations, providing limited insight into agents’ ability to consolidate memory over time or handle frequent knowledge updates.We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations. The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending. To ensure data quality, we employ automated memory-grounding checks and human evaluation. We further introduce Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA), a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory when evaluating long-term memory. Evaluations of four LLMs and six memory agents reveal frequent reuse of invalid memories and failures to reconcile evolving memories. Memory agents offer marginal improvements, exposing shortcomings in long-term memory for personalized agents.

Abstract:
5G technology enables mobile Internet access for billions of users. Its design, implementation and operations are regulated by 3GPP standard specifications. We study standard-native question answering over 5G specifications, where expert-level queries require navigating thousands of pages of cross-referenced standards that evolve across tens of releases. Existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks, including telecom-specific approaches, rely on semantic similarity and cannot reliably resolve cross-references or reason about specification evolution. We present DeepSpecs, a standard-native RAG system with three metadata-rich indices: SpecDB (clause-aligned specification text), ChangeDB (line-level version diffs), and TDocDB (Change Requests with design rationale). DeepSpecs resolves cross-references by recursively retrieving referenced clauses via metadata lookup, and traces evolution by mining clause changes and linking them to corresponding Change Requests. We curate two 5G QA datasets: 573 expert-annotated real-world questions and 350 evolution-focused questions derived from approved Change Requests. Across multiple LLM backends, DeepSpecs outperforms base models and state-of-the-art telecom RAG systems; ablations confirm that cross-reference resolution and evolution-aware retrieval substantially improve answer quality. Our methodology is conceptually applicable to other networked systems.

Abstract:
Diffusion Large Language Models (DLLMs) have recently achieved strong performance, e.g., masked diffusion models (MDMs) can surpass autoregressive models (ARMs) in various tasks. However, DLLMs often struggle with inaccurate early-stage predictions due to limited context, which hinders both the model’s inference efficiency and the output’s overall quality. We propose Calibrated On-Policy Self-Distillation (COPSD) for DLLMs, a simple and efficient method to calibrate early token predictions without requiring demonstration data. COPSD distills an unnormalized target distribution derived from later decoding steps into the original model, enabling more accurate early predictions during inference. Experiments on math, planning, and RLHF tasks show that COPSD improves both effectiveness and efficiency, and further enhances performance when combined with supervised fine-tuning.

Abstract:
LLM-as-a-Judge, which uses LLMs to evaluate responses to open-ended questions, has seen significant growth in recent years. It has been adopted as a scalable alternative to manual human evaluation, such as crowdsourcing, which is often time-consuming and costly. However, the discrepancy between LLM-generated evaluations and human evaluations remains a critical problem in this field. To bridge this gap, we propose Multi-Aspect Panels of LLM Evaluators (MAPLE), a framework that orchestrates evaluations across multiple criteria using multiple LLMs. MAPLE integrates criterion-wise pairwise evaluations from multiple LLMs by estimating the importance of criteria and the reliability of individual evaluators. We conduct experiments with both open-source and closed-source models. Our results demonstrate that MAPLE achieves superior alignment with human evaluations compared to baselines, highlighting the importance of employing multi-agent and multi-criteria evaluation strategies.

Abstract:
Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) systems often exhibit a perceived preference for high-resource languages, particularly English, resulting in the widespread adoption of English pivoting. While prior studies attribute this advantage to the superior English-centric capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), we find that such measurements are significantly distorted by structural priors inherent in evaluation benchmarks. Specifically, we identify exposure bias and a gold availability prior—both driven by the disproportionate concentration of resources in English—as well as cultural priors rooted in topic locality, as factors that hinder accurate assessment of genuine language preference. To address these biases, we propose DeLP (Debiased Language Preference), a calibrated metric designed to explicitly factor out these structural confounds. Our analysis using DeLP reveals that the previously reported English preference is largely a byproduct of evidence distribution rather than an inherent model bias. Instead, we find that retrievers fundamentally favor monolingual alignment between the query and the document language. Building on this insight, we introduce DELTA (DEbiased Language preference–guided Text Augmentation), a lightweight and efficient mRAG framework that strategically leverages monolingual alignment to optimize cross-lingual retrieval and generation. Experimental results demonstrate that DELTA consistently outperforms English pivoting and mRAG baselines across diverse languages.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) was proposed to address the hallucination question of large language models (LLMs). However, the traditional RAG framework has certain limitations: for simple questions, the search results often introduce a large amount of irrelevant information; while for complex questions, the lengthy reference knowledge provided by the retrieval lacks structural information. Therefore, we proposed a structure-aware RAG, which achieves noise removal in retrieval through multi-chain graph navigation reasoning(Trig-Nav). This method constructs question triple reasoning chains and reference knowledge graphs with text attributes, allowing the system to retrieve three types of knowledge along different paths based on the requirements of LLM. It provides LLM with multi-angle and structured information input and significantly reduces noise. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of Trig-Nav, comparing it with baseline methods across multiple datasets.Compared to traditional RAG, there is an average improvement of 6% in effectiveness. The results showed that Trig-Nav significantly enhances the model’s performance, validating the effectiveness of this approach.

Abstract:
We introduce a constraint-selection-based experiment design for measuring narrative preferences of Large Language Models (LLMs). This design offers an interpretable lens on LLMs’ narrative selection behavior. We developed a library of 200 narratology-grounded constraints and prompted selections from six LLMs under three different instruction types: basic, quality-focused, and creativity-focused. Findings demonstrate that models consistently prioritize Style over narrative content elements like Event, Character, and Setting. Style preferences remain stable across models and instruction types, whereas content elements show cross-model divergence and instructional sensitivity. These results suggest that LLMs have latent narrative preferences, which should inform how the NLP community evaluates and deploys models in creative domains.

Abstract:
Interactive medical consultation requires an agent to proactively elicit missing clinical evidence under uncertainty. Yet existing evaluations largely remain static or outcome-centric, neglecting the evidence-gathering process. In this work, we propose an interactive evaluation framework that explicitly models the consultation process using a simulated patient and a measurement module grounded in atomic evidences. Based on this representation, we introduce Information Coverage Rate (ICR) to quantify how completely an agent uncovers necessary evidence during interaction. To support systematic study, we build EviMed, an evidence-based benchmark spanning diverse conditions from common complaints to rare diseases, and evaluate 10 models with varying reasoning abilities. We find that strong diagnostic reasoning does not guarantee effective information collection, and this insufficiency acts as a primary bottleneck limiting performance in interactive settings. To address this, we propose REFINE, a strategy that leverages diagnostic verification to guide the agent in proactively resolving uncertainties. Extensive experiments demonstrate that REFINE consistently outperforms baseline methods across diverse models and datasets, achieving superior information coverage and diagnostic accuracy.

Abstract:
Test-Time Scaling (TTS) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods — most notably majority voting and heuristic token-level scoring — treat reasoning traces or tokens equally, thereby being susceptible to substantial variations in trajectory quality and localized logical failures. In this work, we introduce Chronos, a lightweight and plug-and-play chronological reasoning scorer that models each trajectory as a time series. Specifically, Chronos learns to capture trajectory features of token probabilities, assigns quality scores accordingly, and employs a weighted voting mechanism. Extensive evaluations on both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks demonstrate that Chronos consistently delivers substantial gains across a variety of models, with negligible computational overhead. Notably, Chronos@128 achieves relative improvements of 34.21% over Pass@1 and 22.70% over Maj@128 on HMMT25 using Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507, highlighting its effectiveness.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning abilities for planning long-horizon, real-world tasks, yet existing agent benchmarks focus on task completion while neglecting time efficiency in parallel and asynchronous operations. To address this, we present ParaCook, a benchmark for time-efficient collaborative planning. Inspired by the Overcooked game, ParaCook provides an environment for various challenging interaction planning of multi-agent systems that are instantiated as cooking tasks, with a simplified action space to isolate the core challenge of strategic parallel planning. Through a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that current approaches achieve suboptimal plans, which struggle with parallel actions or coordination. Our analysis also reveals LLMs’ potential on abstract tasks where they can focus on high-level parallel optimization. ParaCook provides a scalable evaluation framework with adjustable complexity, establishing a foundation for developing and assessing time efficiency-aware multi-agent planning.

Abstract:
Hieroglyphs, as logographic writing systems, encode rich semantic and cultural information within their internal structural composition. Yet, current advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) usually remain structurally blind to this information. LLMs process characters as textual tokens, while MLLMs additionally view them as raw pixel grids. Both fall short to model the underlying logic of character strokes. Furthermore, existing structural analysis methods are often script-specific and labor-intensive. In this paper, we propose Hieroglyphic Stroke Analyzer (HieroSA), a novel and generalizable framework that enables MLLMs to automatically derive stroke-level structures from character bitmaps without handcrafted data. It transforms modern logographic and ancient hieroglyphs character images into explicit, interpretable line-segment representations in a normalized coordinate space, allowing for cross-lingual generalization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HieroSA effectively captures character-internal structures and semantics, bypassing the need for language-specific priors. Experimental results highlight the potential of our work as a graphematics analysis tool for a deeper understanding of hieroglyphic scripts.

Abstract:
The Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system based on Large language model (LLM) has made significant progress. It can effectively reduce factuality hallucinations, but faithfulness hallucinations still exist. Previous methods for detecting faithfulness hallucinations either neglect to capture the models’ internal reasoning processes or handle those features coarsely, making it difficult for discriminators to learn. This paper proposes a semantic-level internal reasoning graph-based method for detecting faithfulness hallucination. Specifically, we first extend the layer-wise relevance propagation algorithm from the token level to the semantic level, constructing an internal reasoning graph based on attribution vectors. This provides a more faithful semantic-level representation of dependency. Furthermore, we design a general framework based on a small pre-trained language model to utilize the dependencies in LLM’s reasoning for training and hallucination detection, which can dynamically adjust the pass rate of correct samples through a threshold. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves better overall performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines on RAGTruth and Dolly-15k. Implementation available here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SIRG-1022.

Abstract:
This paper proposes ReaGeo, an end-to-end geocoding framework based on large language models, designed to overcome the limitations of traditional multi-stage approaches that rely on text or vector similarity retrieval over geographic databases, including workflow complexity, error propagation, and heavy dependence on structured geographic knowledge bases. The method converts geographic coordinates into geohash sequences, reformulating the coordinate prediction task as a text generation problem, and introduces a Chain-of-Thought mechanism to enhance the model’s reasoning over spatial relationships. Furthermore, reinforcement learning with a distance-deviation-based reward is applied to optimize the generation accuracy. Comprehensive experiments show that ReaGeo can accurately handle explicit address queries in single-point predictions and effectively resolve vague relative location queries. In addition, the model demonstrates strong predictive capability for non-point geometric regions, highlighting its versatility and generalization ability in geocoding tasks.

Abstract:
Although machine unlearning is essential for removing private, harmful, or copyrighted content from LLMs, current benchmarks often fail to faithfully represent the true “forgetting scope” learned by the model. We formalize two distinct unlearning granularities, domain-level and instance-level, and propose , an automated framework for synthesizing high-quality forget sets.Unlike prior work relying on external generators, exploits the target model per se to elicit data that matches its internal knowledge distribution through seed-guided and adversarial prompting. Our experiments across diverse benchmarks show that it achieves a superior balance of relevance, diversity, and efficiency. Quantitatively, in the Harry Potter domain, it improves relevance by ∼20 and diversity by ∼ 0.05 while halving the total data size compared to SOTAs. Ultimately, it facilitates more robust forgetting and better utility preservation, providing a more rigorous foundation for evaluating LLM unlearning.

Abstract:
The complexity of recent natural language classification models led to interest in developing methods for improving the performance of explainable models (e.g. Logistic Regression). Existing methods focus on clustering word embeddings to discover fine-grained contextual features that can be used to train a linear model. While those methods help reduce the gap in performance between black-box models and explainable models, they are based on discovering a large number of features, and this affects interpretability. In this work, we propose a model that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and clustering algorithms to discover a compact set of interpretable features. The proposed model first uses GPT-4o mini to extract rationales (i.e. phrases which explain an item’s label) from labeled text, and then clusters those rationales to obtain a compact, interpretable feature space. Across 3 Style Classification tasks, the resulting features achieve comparable performance to word-cluster baselines on most tasks, while reducing the number of features by 85–99%. These results highlight the potential of LLMs to improve the compactness of explainable AI models.

Abstract:
Causal self-attention provides positional information to Transformer decoders. Prior work has shown that stacks of causal self-attention layers alone induce a positional bias in attention scores toward earlier tokens. However, this differs from the bias toward later tokens typically observed in Transformer decoders, known as recency bias. We address this discrepancy by analyzing the interaction between causal self-attention and other architectural components. We show that stacked causal self-attention layers combined with LayerNorm induce recency bias. Furthermore, we examine the effects of residual connections and the distribution of input token embeddings on this bias. Our results provide new theoretical insights into how positional information interacts with architectural components and suggest directions for improving positional encoding strategies.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated notable proficiency in both code generation and comprehension across multiple programming languages. However, the mechanisms underlying this proficiency remain underexplored, particularly with respect to whether distinct programming languages are processed independently or within a shared parametric region. Drawing an analogy to the specialized regions of the brain responsible for distinct cognitive functions, we introduce the concept of Coding Spot, a specialized parametric region within LLMs that facilitates coding capabilities. Our findings identify this Coding Spot and show that targeted modifications to this subset significantly affect performance on coding tasks, while largely preserving non-coding functionalities. This compartmentalization mirrors the functional specialization observed in cognitive neuroscience, where specific brain regions are dedicated to distinct tasks, suggesting that LLMs may similarly employ specialized parameter regions for different knowledge domains.

Abstract:
The success of Large Language Models in mathematical reasoning relies heavily on the generation of diverse and valid solution paths during the rollout phase. However, current rollout techniques face a fundamental trade-off: token-level sampling often yields redundant trajectories that differ only in rephrasing, while embedding-level methods utilizing random noise frequently disrupt semantic consistency. To resolve this, we introduce N-GRPO, a novel exploration strategy integrated into the Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) framework. Rather than relying on token-level sampling or native embedding-level noise, our approach leverages Semantic Neighbor Mixing. This mechanism dynamically constructs input representations by mixing the embeddings of an anchor token and its nearest semantic neighbors, thereby injecting diversity while strictly adhering to the local semantic manifold. Experimental evaluations on the DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen models across different sizes show that not only achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines on math reasoning benchmarks but also exhibits robust generalization capabilities on out-of-distribution tasks.

Abstract:
Legal case facts are often lengthy, complex, and difficult to process, posing challenges for legal judgment prediction. Although recent advances leverage large language models (LLMs) for legal reasoning, they face high computational costs and information degradation when handling long cases. Previous approaches, such as architectural modifications and text compression methods, reduce computational complexity to some extent but still struggle to effectively capture legally salient information in complex cases. We propose a legal knowledge–adaptive compression framework for long legal judgment prediction that integrates domain-specific legal knowledge to guide adaptive context compression. Our approach selectively retains legally relevant information while reducing redundant or less informative content, enabling efficient and accurate long-context reasoning. We evaluate the proposed framework on four real-world datasets spanning multiple jurisdictions and languages. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms existing approaches in both prediction performance and computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Experience intervention in web agents emerges as a promising technical paradigm, enhancing agent interaction capabilities by providing valuable insights from accumulated experiences. However, existing methods predominantly inject experience passively as global context before task execution, struggling to adapt to dynamically changing contextual observations during agent-environment interaction. We propose ExpSeek, which shifts experience toward step-level proactive seeking: (1) estimating step-level entropy thresholds to determine intervention timing using the model’s intrinsic signals; (2) designing step-level tailored experience content. Experiments on Qwen3-8B and 32B models across four challenging web agent benchmarks demonstrate that ExpSeek achieves absolute improvements of 9.3% and 7.5%, respectively. Our experiments validate the feasibility and advantages of entropy as a self-triggering signal, reveal that even a small-scale 4B experience model can significantly boost the performance of larger agent models. The code is released at https://github.com/WYRipple/ExpSeek.

Abstract:
Memory enables Large Language Model (LLM) agents to perceive, store, and use information from past dialogues, which is essential for personalization. However, existing methods fail to properly model the temporal dimension of memory in two aspects: 1) Temporal inaccuracy: memories are organized by dialogue time rather than their actual occurrence time; 2) Temporal fragmentation: existing methods focus on point-wise memory, losing durative information that captures persistent states and evolving patterns. To address these limitations, we propose Temporal Semantic Memory (TSM), a memory framework that models semantic time for point-wise memory and supports the construction and utilization of durative memory. During memory construction, it first builds a semantic timeline rather than a dialogue one. Then, it consolidates temporally continuous and semantically related information into a durative memory. During memory utilization, it incorporates the query’s temporal intent on the semantic timeline, enabling the retrieval of temporally appropriate durative memories and providing time-valid, duration-consistent context to support response generation. Experiments on LongMemEval and LoCoMo show that TSM consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves up to 12.2% absolute improvement in accuracy, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Abstract:
Accurately identifying student misconceptions is crucial for personalized education but faces three challenges: (1) data scarcity with long-tail distribution, where authentic student reasoning is difficult to synthesize; (2) fuzzy boundaries between error categories with high annotation noise; (3) deployment paradox—large models overlook unconventional approaches due to pretraining bias and cannot be deployed on edge, while small models overfit to noise. Unlike traditional methods that increase diversity through large-scale data synthesis, we propose a two-stage knowledge distillation framework that mines high-value samples from existing data. The first stage performs standard distillation to transfer task capabilities. The second stage introduces a dual-layer marginal selection mechanism based on cognitive uncertainty, identifying four types of critical samples based on teacher model uncertainty and confidence differences. For different data subsets, we design difficulty-adaptive mechanism to balance hard/soft label contributions, enabling student models to inherit inter-class relationships from teacher soft labels while distinguishing ambiguous error types. Experiments show that with augmented training on only 10.30% of filtered samples, we achieve MAP@3 of 0.9585 (+17.8%) on the MAP-Charting dataset, and using only a 4B parameter model, we attain 84.38% accuracy on cross-topic tests of middle school algebra misconception benchmarks, significantly outperforming sota LLM (67.73%) and standard fine-tuned 72B models (81.25%). Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/acl2026_map-5847/ .

Abstract:
Recent text-to-image models achieve impressive visual quality but still face challenges in precise controllability, balancing multimodal inputs, and high training cost for multimodal image generation. To address these limitations, we propose MENTOR, an autoregressive (AR) framework with a two-stage training paradigm for controllable multimodal image generation: (1) a multimodal alignment stage that establishes robust pixel and semantic-level alignment between inputs and generated tokens, followed by (2) a multimodal instruction tuning stage that balance model’s integration of multimodal inputs and enhance generation controllability. Extensive experiments on DreamBench++ and DreamBench demonstrate that, despite modest model size and training resources, achieves a strong balance between textual and visual guidance for controllable image generation, delivering competitive performance at significantly lower computational cost compared to leading baselines. Moreover, our approach attains superior image reconstruction fidelity, broad adaptability across different tasks, and training efficiency.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems have become a standard approach for grounding large language models in external knowledge. However, they are constrained by a decoupled architecture: retrieval and reasoning operate as separate stages, with retrieved text merely prepended as passive context. This prevents deep integration of knowledge into the model’s parametric reasoning, leading to fragmented responses for complex queries requiring multi-document synthesis or conflict resolution. To bridge this gap, we propose NeuRAG, an end-to-end Neuralized RAG framework that unifies knowledge retrieval and fusion through Hyper-Neurons—parameterized modules encoding entire documents directly into the model’s parameter space. In NeuRAG, each document is encoded as a lightweight LoRA module, conceptualized as a knowledge neuron. These neurons collectively form a document-adaptive Hyper-Layer, which dynamically activates and fuses knowledge neurons via an attention mechanism conditioned on the input hidden-state query. This enables the model to jointly retrieve and reason within a single forward pass, seamlessly integrating external knowledge into its inference pathway. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and LLMs demonstrate NeuRAG’s strong and consistent performance as a promising novel RAG paradigm.

Abstract:
Most existing Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) methods rely on holistic fusion, treating all modalities and temporal segments equally. Such strategies often introduce redundant information and obscure the decision process, limiting both robustness and interpretability. Inspired by dual-process theory, we propose FRSR (Fast Retrieval and Slow Reasoning), an interpretable framework that decomposes multimodal sentiment modeling into two cooperative pathways. The Fast Pathway acts as a lightweight evidence selector, using context-aware convolution and auxiliary supervision to retrieve a sparse set of Top- K sentiment-relevant cues from noisy multimodal inputs. Based on these cues, the Slow Pathway performs deeper cross-modal reasoning through learnable reasoning tokens, enabling hierarchical sentiment inference. By separating salient evidence retrieval from multimodal reasoning, FRSR improves interpretability while reducing computational cost. Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that FRSR achieves competitive performance, higher efficiency, stronger robustness to noise, and clearer decision transparency than existing holistic fusion methods.

Abstract:
Implicit In-Context Learning compresses demonstration examples into a single context vector and injects it into the model’s activation space, achieving few-shot-level performance at near zero-shot inference cost. However, existing approaches typically aggregate demonstrations from all classes into a shared, task-level context vector, capturing global task information but without explicitly preserving fine-grained, class-conditional semantic distinctions. In this work, we propose Class-Conditional Context Vectors (C 3 V), a simple yet effective extension to implicit in-context learning that explicitly models class-specific contextual information by constructing separate context vectors for each class, without relying on explicit prompts. These class-conditional context vectors are additively injected into the model’s residual streams in a single forward pass, enabling contextual contributions to be modulated in a class-aware manner while keeping the backbone frozen. We evaluate C 3 V on multiple text classification benchmarks across several families of large language models. Experimental results demonstrate that C 3 V consistently outperforms task-level context vector baselines, and achieves higher average accuracy than conventional few-shot learning on most models.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated promising gains in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, its dependence on domain-specific verifiers significantly restricts its applicability to open and general domains. Recent efforts such as RLPR have extended RLVR to general domains, enabling training on broader datasets and achieving improvements over RLVR. However, a notable limitation of these methods is their tendency to overfit to reference answers, which constrains the model’s ability to generate diverse outputs. This limitation is particularly pronounced in open-ended tasks such as writing, where multiple plausible answers exist. To address this, we propose DARL, a simple yet effective reinforcement learning framework that encourages the generation of diverse answers within a controlled deviation range from the reference while preserving alignment with it. Our framework is fully compatible with existing general reinforcement learning methods and can be seamlessly integrated without additional verifiers. Extensive experiments on thirteen benchmarks demonstrate overall improvements in reasoning performance. Notably, DARL surpasses RLPR, achieving average gains of 1.3 points on six reasoning benchmarks and 9.5 points on seven general benchmarks, highlighting its effectiveness in improving both reasoning accuracy and output diversity.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in text-to-SQL generation, yet existing approaches remain prone to hallucinations and lack verification mechanisms. Current methods such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) typically rely on intermediate reasoning that is either purely textual or executed only as a final step, leaving the reasoning process opaque and prone to grounding and logical hallucinations. In this paper, we introduce Verifiable Execution Tracing (VET), a novel reasoning paradigm that transforms text-to-SQL from unverifiable textual rationales into step-wise executable semantics. VET addresses these limitations by constraining the reasoning process within a candidate schema space and formulating it as a sequence of executable Python steps. Crucially, each step is executed against the real database to produce observable intermediate results, which serve as immediate verification feedback and transform the traditionally opaque generation process into a transparent, debuggable interaction with database reality.Experiments show consistent gains under matched, training-free settings, achieving 70.93% execution accuracy on BIRD and 37.04% on Spider 2.0-lite, with particularly strong improvements on complex queries.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making across diverse domains. Ensuring the generation of safe and reliable responses is critical for the effective deployment of LLM-based applications, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance. Most of these applications typically use carefully crafted prompts to guide response generation; however, the relationship between prompts and the reliability of LLM-generated responses is not yet fully understood. To address this gap, we propose a novel prompt-response concept model that explains the relationship between the amount of task-relevant information (informativeness) provided in the prompt and the LLM-generated response uncertainty by identifying four sources of response uncertainty: prompt underspecification, model quality, task variability, and semantic redundancy. We prove that response uncertainty decreases as prompt informativeness or model quality increases, mirroring the behavior of epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic models. Our experimental results on real-world datasets further validate our proposed model and corroborate the theoretical results.

Abstract:
We are entering an era in which individuals and organizations increasingly deploy dedicated AI agents that interact and collaborate with other agents.However, the dynamics of multi-agent collaboration under privacy constraints remain poorly understood.In this work, we present PAC - Bench , a benchmark for systematic evaluation of multi-agent collaboration under privacy constraints.Experiments on PAC - Bench show that privacy constraints substantially degrade collaboration performance and make outcomes depend more on the initiating agent than the partner.Further analysis reveals that this degradation is driven by recurring coordination breakdowns, including early-stage privacy violations, overly conservative abstraction, and privacy-induced hallucinations.Together, our findings identify privacy-aware multi-agent collaboration as a distinct and unresolved challenge that requires new coordination mechanisms beyond existing agent capabilities.

Abstract:
Large Language Models exhibit advanced reasoning capabilities that enable them to address complex tasks, but these capabilities also increase the risk of generating harmful content, particularly in multi-turn dialogues. Existing inference-phase safety alignment methods face three major challenges. First, they lack the relationship consideration between question and response, making the model easy to provide harmful content toward complex scenarios. Second, they are difficult to adapt to defense instruction. Third, these methods fail to effectively leverage historical information for safe response generation. To address these challenges, we propose CogGSE, an inference-time safety alignment framework that explicitly models the cognitive process of problem solving through a structured cognitive analysis graph. We retrieve a question-specific graph to ensure the safety information is tailored to the query. To fully exploit historical information in multi-turn settings, we retrieve relevant graphs from previous turns and selectively retain safety-related nodes, which are jointly used with the current-turn graph to guide safe response generation. This design enables transparent, controllable reasoning while maintaining strong safety guarantees. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in multiple safety scenarios.

Abstract:
Existing information extraction (IE) tasks increasingly adopt in-context learning (ICL) with large language models. However, current approaches either show inconsistent performance across model scales or lack systematic optimization and generalizability. Building on this, we propose BCL-IE (Bayesian In-Context Learning Framework for Information Extraction), the first optimization framework that uses particle filtering with Bayesian updates to systematically refine label representations across IE tasks. Through four steps—initialization, observation, weight update, and resampling, BCL-IE generalizes to both sequence labeling and relation classification paradigms. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements over existing approaches (up to 30%), achieving prior performance while other methods either fail to generalize or show limited effectiveness.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely used for question answering over well-structured document corpora. However, a large amount of real-world problem-solving knowledge is captured in goal-oriented dialogues, where common ground misalignment between users and helpers gives rise to sparse, diffuse, and dynamically refined evidence that challenges standard RAG pipelines. We propose Structured Dialogue Refinement (SDR), a unified framework that adapts dialogue corpora for RAG at both the retrieval and generation stages without altering the underlying pipeline. Specifically, SDR introduces Dual Dialogue Querying for intent-aligned retrieval via issue-centric and solution-centric pseudo-documents, and Graph-Structured Dialogues coupled with a relevance-driven subgraph selection strategy to enable effective utilization of conversational evidence. We further adopt a nugget-based evaluation setup for dialogue-grounded RAG, enabling fine-grained analysis of retrieval coverage and grounded answer generation. Experiments demonstrate that SDR substantially improves both retrieval quality and grounded QA performance under dialogue-specific structural challenges.

Abstract:
Presentation generation requires deep content research, coherent visual design, and iterative refinement based on observation. However, existing presentation agents often rely on predefined workflows and fixed templates. To address this, we present DeepPresenter, an agentic framework that adapts to diverse user intents, enables effective feedback-driven refinement, and generalizes beyond a scripted pipeline. Specifically, DeepPresenter autonomously plans, renders, and revises intermediate slide artifacts to support long-horizon refinement with environmental observations. Furthermore, rather than relying on self-reflection over internal signals (e.g., reasoning traces), our environment-grounded reflection conditions the generation process on perceptual artifact states (e.g., rendered slides), enabling the system to identify and correct presentation-specific issues during execution. Results on the evaluation set covering diverse presentation-generation scenarios show that DeepPresenter achieves state-of-the-art performance, and the fine-tuned DeepPresenter-9B remains highly competitive at substantially lower cost.

Abstract:
The application of physics formulas is a fundamental human capability in numerical reasoning. While existing datasets often rely on implicit mathematical knowledge, they rarely explicitate the underlying formulas. To address this, we introduce FormulaReasoning, a new benchmark for formula-based numerical reasoning comprising 5,324 questions requiring calculations grounded in external physics principles. We provide high-quality, fine-grained annotations in English and Chinese—including formula structures, parameter names, symbols, values, and units—curated through manual effort and LLM-assisted validation. Additionally, we provide a consolidated formula database as an external knowledge source. To further challenge model performance, we develop an extended version of the dataset by coupling multiple questions. We evaluate various architectural and methodological frameworks, including retrieval-augmented methods, modular reasoning (formula generation, parameter extraction, and calculation), and preference-based optimization. Our analysis identifies critical challenges in formula-based reasoning, highlighting significant opportunities for future methodological advancement.

Abstract:
Reasoning language models (RLMs) achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks, yet they still exhibit a multilingual reasoning gap, performing better in high-resource languages than in low-resource ones. While recent efforts have been made to address this gap, its underlying causes remain largely unexplored. In this work, we show that this gap primarily stems from failures in language understanding—specifically, the model’s inability to translate multilingual inputs into the language dominating its reasoning traces (typically English). As identifying understanding failures can enable targeted mitigation of the gap, we evaluate a range of detection methods and find that understanding failures are detectable to a meaningful extent, with supervised approaches performing best. Building on this, we propose Selective Translation, a strategy that incorporates an English translation into the initial reasoning trace when an understanding failure is detected. Experimental results using Qwen3-4B show that Selective Translation substantially bridges the multilingual reasoning gap, achieving near full-translation performance while translating only about 20% of inputs. Together, our results show that failures in language understanding are the primary driver of the multilingual reasoning gap and can be detected and selectively mitigated, clarifying its origin and suggesting a path toward more equitable multilingual reasoning.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated that explicitly performing step-by-step thinking before producing final outputs can substantially improve performance on complex tasks, as exemplified by recent reasoning-oriented models such as OpenAI O1 and DeepSeek R1. Inspired by these advancements, we propose the O1 Embedder, a novel approach aiming to endow retrieval models with similar capabilities to address challenges like multi-task retrieval, zero-shot retrieval, and tasks requiring intensive reasoning of complex relationships. The O1 Embedder generates preliminary thoughts for input queries before document retrieval. To realize this objective, we address two fundamental challenges in integrating thinking mechanisms into dense retrieval. First, retrieval tasks lack explicit supervision for intermediate thinking processes, making it difficult to define thoughts that are truly useful for retrieval. We address this challenge with a data synthesis framework following an “Exploration-Refinement” process, ensuring alignment with retrieval utility. Second, effectively integrating thought generation with representation learning requires a unified modeling framework that can jointly support generation and embedding within a single model. O1 Embedder addresses this challenge by jointly optimizing thought generation and dense retrieval in an end-to-end manner, enhancing retrieval accuracy while reducing complexity through a single deployable model. Extensive evaluations across diverse datasets demonstrate significant performance improvements, highlighting the effectiveness and generalization capability of O1 Embedder.

Abstract:
Recent work on reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has shown that large language models (LLMs) can be substantially improved using outcome-level verification signals, such as unit tests for code or exact-match checks for mathematics. In parallel, process supervision has long been explored as a way to shape the intermediate reasoning behaviour of LLMs, but existing approaches rely on neural judges to score chain-of-thought steps, leaving them vulnerable to opacity, bias, and reward hacking. To address this gap, we introduce Verifiable Process Reward Models (VPRMs), a reinforcement-learning framework in which intermediate reasoning steps are checked by deterministic, rule-based verifiers. We apply VPRMs to risk-of-bias assessment for medical evidence synthesis, a domain where guideline-defined criteria and rule-based decision paths enable programmatic verification of reasoning traces. Across multiple datasets, we find that VPRMs generate reasoning that adheres closely to domain rules and achieve substantially higher coherence between step-level decisions and final labels. Results show that VPRMs achieve up to 20% higher F1 than state-of-the-art models and 6.5% higher than verifiable outcome rewards, with substantial gains in evidence grounding and logical coherence.

Abstract:
Despite significant advances in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) driven by reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), this paradigm is fundamentally limited in specialized or novel domains where such supervision is prohibitively expensive or unavailable, posing a key challenge for test-time adaptation. While existing test-time methods offer a potential solution, they are constrained by learning from static query sets, risking overfitting to textual patterns. To address this gap, we introduce Test-Time Variational Synthesis (TTVS), a novel framework that enables LRMs to self-evolve by dynamically augmenting the training stream from unlabeled test queries. TTVS comprises two synergistic modules: (1) Online Variational Synthesis, which transforms static test queries into a dynamic stream of diverse, semantically-equivalent variations, enforcing the model to learn underlying problem logic rather than superficial patterns; (2) Test-time Hybrid Exploration, which balances accuracy-driven exploitation with consistency-driven exploration across synthetic variants. Extensive experiments show TTVS yields superior performance across eight model architectures. Notably, using only unlabeled test-time data, TTVS not only surpasses other test-time adaptation methods but also outperforms state-of-the-art supervised RL-based techniques trained on vast, high-quality labeled data.

Abstract:
Language models frequently produce plausible yet incorrect reasoning traces that are difficult to verify. We investigate fine-tuning models to use Prolog as an external symbolic reasoning tool, training Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on a cleaned version of GSM8K (which we release as gsm8k-prolog-prover). We systematically vary prompt structure, reward composition (execution, syntax, semantics, structure), and inference protocol (single-try, multiple-try, and two agentic modes). Our reinforcement learning approach outperforms supervised fine-tuning on GSM8K, and the resulting 3B model achieves zero-shot performance on MMLU-STEM and MMLU-Pro competitive with 7B few-shot baselines. Most importantly, we identify an accuracy–auditability trade-off: configurations tuned for correctness alone learn to delegate reasoning to natural language and use Prolog only for the final computation, while configurations rewarded for symbolic structure produce fully auditable programs at a cost in accuracy. We interpret this trade-off as a form of reward hacking and discuss its implications for deploying neurosymbolic systems in safety-critical domains.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly grounded in sensor data to perceive and reason about human physiology and the physical world. However, accurately interpreting heterogeneous multimodal sensor data remains a fundamental challenge. We show that a single monolithic LLM often fails to reason coherently across modalities, leading to incomplete interpretations and prior-knowledge bias. We introduce ConSensus, a training-free multi-agent collaboration framework that decomposes multimodal sensing tasks into specialized, modality-aware agents. To aggregate agent-level interpretations, we propose a hybrid fusion mechanism that balances semantic aggregation, which enables cross-modal reasoning and contextual understanding, with statistical consensus, which provides robustness through agreement across modalities. While each approach has complementary failure modes, their combination enables reliable inference under sensor noise and missing data. We evaluate ConSensus on five diverse multimodal sensing benchmarks, demonstrating an average accuracy improvement of 7.1% over the single-agent baseline. Furthermore, ConSensus matches or exceeds the performance of iterative multi-agent debate methods while achieving a 12.7 times reduction in average fusion token cost through a single-round hybrid fusion protocol, yielding a robust and efficient solution for real-world multimodal sensing tasks. The source code is available at https://github.com/nokia/multi-agent-collaboration-for-multimodal-sensing.

Abstract:
Software engineering (SE) agents powered by large language models are increasingly adopted in practice, yet they often incur substantial monetary cost. We introduce EET, an experience-driven early termination approach that reduces the cost of SE agents while preserving task performance. EET extracts structured experience from prior issue-resolution executions and leverages it to guide early termination during patch generation and selection, reducing unproductive iterations. We evaluate EET on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark across three representative SE agents. EET consistently reduces total cost by 19%–55% (32% on average), with negligible loss in resolution rate (at most 0.2%). These efficiency gains are achieved, on average, by identifying early-termination opportunities for 11% of issues and reducing API calls, input tokens, and output tokens by 21%, 30%, and 25%, respectively. We release the code, prompts, and data at https://github.com/IanWalls/EET.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in code generation, but their adherence to fine-grained user intent with multiple constraints remains a significant challenge. Our empirical analysis reveals two key observations: 1) Model performance deteriorates quickly as the number of constraints in the user intent increases, and 2) While user intent does influence the model’s logits, such an influence may not be strong enough to effectively steer the decoding process. To this end, we propose Intent-Amplified Code Generation (IntentCoding), a novel decoding strategy that enhances an LLM’s ability to follow user intent. IntentCoding captures the influence of user intent by masking out the intent, and applies a multi-strength ensemble mechanism to amplify the effect of user intent during generation. IntentCoding is model-agnostic, requires no additional training, and integrates seamlessly with existing decoding procedures. To enable systematic evaluation, we also construct CodeConstraints, a benchmark dataset specifically designed to test user intent compliance under varying numbers of constraints. Experiments on our constructed Constraints, as well as popular IFEvalCode, HumanEval and LiveCodeBench datasets, show that our IntentCoding model significantly improves both constraint satisfaction and functional correctness compared to standard decoding approaches. IntentCoding achieves up to 71.0% relative improvement on CodeConstraints, achieves up to 67.3% relative improvement on IFEvalCode and achieves up to 29.3% relative improvement in pass@1 on HumanEval and LiveCodeBench compared with greedy decoding.

Abstract:
We introduce SuperIgor, a framework for instruction-following tasks. Unlike prior methods that rely on predefined subtasks, SuperIgor enables a language model to generate and refine high-level plans through a self-learning mechanism, reducing the need for manual dataset annotation. Our approach involves iterative co-training: an RL agent is trained to follow the generated plans, while the language model adapts and modifies these plans based on RL feedback and preferences. This creates a feedback loop where both the agent and the planner improve jointly. We validate our framework in environments with rich dynamics and stochasticity. Results show that SuperIgor agents adhere to instructions more strictly than baseline methods, while also demonstrating strong generalization to previously unseen instructions.

Abstract:
Personalized image aesthetics assessment (PIAA) is an important research problem with practical real-world applications. While methods based on vision-language models (VLMs) are promising candidates for PIAA, it remains unclear whether they internally encode rich, multi-level aesthetic attributes required for effective personalization. In this paper, we first analyze the internal representations of VLMs to examine the presence and distribution of such aesthetic attributes, and then leverage them for lightweight, individual-level personalization without model fine-tuning. Our analysis reveals that VLMs encode diverse aesthetic attributes that propagate into the language decoder layers. Building on these representations, we demonstrate that simple linear models can achieve effective personalized image aesthetics assessment. We further analyze how aesthetic information is transferred across layers in different VLM architectures and across image domains. Our findings provide insights into how VLMs can be utilized for modeling subjective, individual aesthetic preferences.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has delivered impressive gains in mathematical and multimodal reasoning and has become a standard post-training paradigm for contemporary language and vision-language models. However, the RLVR recipe introduces a significant risk of capability regression, where models forget foundational skills after prolonged training without employing regularization strategies. We empirically confirm this concern, observing that open-source reasoning models suffer performance degradation on core capabilities such as perception and faithfulness. While imposing regularization terms like KL divergence can help prevent deviation from the base model, these terms are calculated on the current task, thus they do not guarantee broader knowledge. Meanwhile, commonly used experience replay across heterogeneous domains makes it nontrivial to decide how much training focus each objective should receive. To address this, we propose RECAP—a replay strategy with dynamic objective reweighting for general knowledge preservation. Our reweighting mechanism adapts in an online manner using short-horizon signals of convergence and instability, shifting the post-training focus away from saturated objectives and toward underperforming or volatile ones. Our method is end-to-end and readily applicable to existing RLVR pipelines without training additional models or heavy tuning. Extensive experiments on benchmarks based on Qwen2.5-VL-3B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, which not only preserves general capabilities but also improves reasoning by enabling more flexible trade-offs among in-task rewards.

Abstract:
Label projection is an effective technique for cross-lingual transfer, extending span-annotated datasets from a high-resource language to low-resource ones. Most approaches perform label projection as a separate step after machine translation, and prior work that combines the two reports degraded translation quality. We re-evaluate this claim with LabelPigeon, a novel framework that jointly performs translation and label projection via XML tags. We design a direct evaluation scheme for label projection, and find that LabelPigeon outperforms baselines and actively improves translation quality in 11 languages. We further assess translation quality across 203 languages and varying annotation complexity, finding consistent improvement attributed to additional fine-tuning. Finally, across 27 languages and three downstream tasks, we report substantial gains in cross-lingual transfer over comparable work, up to +40.2 F1 on NER. Overall, our results demonstrate that XML-tagged label projection provides effective and efficient label transfer without compromising translation quality.

Abstract:
Time series captioning, the task of describing time series in natural language, requires numeric and temporal reasoning, trend interpretation, and contextual understanding. Existing benchmarks, however, often rely on fully synthetic or generic captions, and typically neglect metadata and visual representations. We introduce CaTS-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for Context-aware Time Series reasoning across 11 diverse domains, centered on a gold-standard evaluation set of 1746 human-rewritten captions that measure how effectively models translate numeric trends into immediately interpretable narratives. To address the scarcity of human-annotated data, we also propose a scalable pipeline for generating high-fidelity synthetic captions, the quality of which we validate. We evaluate leading Vision-Language Models on our benchmark, revealing that even proprietary models struggle to capture numeric nuances in temporal descriptions, while finetuning open-source models on synthetic data yields substantial performance gains. Finally, we release a diagnostic suite of 910 multiple-choice questions and use tailored numeric metrics to gauge time-series-specific reasoning capabilities, establishing CaTS-Bench as a reliable foundation for grounded, multimodal text generation in numeric domains.

Abstract:
In this study, we present Healthcare Codec-Fake Detection (HCFD), a new task for detecting codec-fakes under pathological speech conditions. We intentionally focus on codec based synthetic speech in this work, since neural codec decoding forms a core building block in modern speech generation pipelines. First, we release Healthcare CodecFake, the first pathology-aware dataset containing paired real and NAC-synthesized speech across multiple clinical conditions and codec families. Our evaluations show that SOTA codec-fake detectors trained primarily on healthy speech perform poorly on Healthcare CodecFake, highlighting the need for HCFD-specific models. Second, we demonstrate that PaSST outperforms existing speech-based models for HCFD, benefiting from its patch-based spectro-temporal representation. Finally, we propose PHOENIX-Mamba, a geometry-aware framework that models codec-fakes as multiple self-discovered modes in hyperbolic space and achieves the strongest performance on HCFD across clinical conditions and codecs. Experiments on HCFK show that PHOENIX-Mamba (PaSST) achieves the best overall performance, reaching 97.04 Acc on E-Dep, 96.73 on E-Alz, and 96.57 on E-Dys, while maintaining strong results on Chinese with 94.41 (Dep), 94.40 (Alz), and 93.20 (Dys). This geometry-aware formulation enables self-discovered clustering of heterogeneous codec-fake modes in hyperbolic space, facilitating robust discrimination under pathological speech variability. PHOENIX-Mamba achieves topmost performance on the HCFD task across clinical conditions and codecs.

Abstract:
Existing work on value alignment typically characterizes value relations statically, ignoring how alignment interventions—such as prompting, fine-tuning, or preference optimization—reshape the broader value system. In practice, aligning a target value can implicitly shift other values, creating value trade-offs that remain largely unmeasured.We introduce the VAT, a framework that quantifies value trade-offs by measuring how alignment-induced changes propagate across interconnected values relative to achieved on-target gain. VAT captures the system-level dynamics of value expression under alignment intervention, enabling evaluation of both intended improvements and unintended side effects.Using a controlled scenario–action dataset grounded in Schwartz value theory, we collect paired pre–post normative judgments and analyze alignment effects across models, values, and interventions. Results show that alignment often produces uneven and structured co-movement among values, revealing systematic trade-offs between target and non-target values. These effects are largely invisible under conventional target-only evaluation, but become evident via VAT, highlighting process-level alignment risks and offering new insights into the dynamic nature of value alignment in LLMs.Dataset and code are open-sourced.

Abstract:
Charts are widely used to present complex information. Deriving meaningful insights in real-world contexts often requires interpreting multiple related charts together. Research on understanding multi-chart images has not been extensively explored. We introduce PolyChartQA, a mid-scale dataset specifically designed for question answering over multi-chart images. PolyChartQA comprises 534 multi-chart images (with a total of 2,297 sub-charts) sourced from peer-reviewed computer science research publications and 2,694 QA pairs. We evaluate the performance of nine state-of-the-art Multimodal Language Models (MLMs) on PolyChartQA across question type, difficulty, question source, and key structural characteristics of multi-charts. Our results show a 27.4% LLM-based accuracy (L-Accuracy) drop on human-authored questions compared to MLM-generated questions, and a 5.39% L-accuracy gain with our proposed prompting method.

Abstract:
Scaling training compute, measured in FLOPs, has long been shown to improve the accuracy of large language models, yet training remains resource-intensive. Prior work shows that increasing test-time compute (TTC)—for example through iterative sampling—can allow smaller models to rival or surpass much larger ones at lower overall cost. We introduce TTC-aware training, where an intermediate checkpoint and a corresponding TTC configuration can together match or exceed the accuracy of a fully trained model while requiring substantially fewer training FLOPs. Building on this insight, we propose an early stopping algorithm that jointly selects a checkpoint and TTC configuration to minimize training compute without sacrificing accuracy. To make this practical, we develop an efficient TTC evaluation method that avoids exhaustive search, and we formalize a break-even bound that identifies when increased inference compute compensates for reduced training compute. Experiments demonstrate up to 92% reductions in training FLOPs while maintaining and sometimes remarkably improving accuracy. These results highlight a new perspective for balancing training and inference compute in model development, enabling faster deployment cycles and more frequent model refreshes.

Abstract:
Formal postconditions precisely characterize program behavior and support debugging, testing, and verification, but writing them requires substantial expertise and effort. This has motivated recent work on automatically generating postconditions from code and natural-language artifacts using large language models (LLMs). However, evaluation remains a key bottleneck. Existing benchmarks primarily emphasize correctness under limited evaluation settings, often relying on surface-form matching or manual assessment on small or synthetic datasets.We introduce POSTCONDBENCH, a multilingual benchmark for evaluating method-level postcondition generation from real-world software. POSTCONDBENCH comprises 420 Python and Java tasks drawn from 121 open-source projects, each paired with a high-quality ground-truth postcondition set constructed with expert involvement. To enable automatic evaluation, POSTCONDBENCH provides a runnable execution environment and operationalizes completeness via defect discrimination: a postcondition set is more complete if it is violated by more defective implementations while remaining satisfied on correct executions. Using POSTCONDBENCH, we formulate three generation settings and evaluate five SOTA LLMs. Our results reveal a substantial gap between correctness and completeness, and show that repository-level dependencies and method complexity exacerbate this gap.

Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce the Polish Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (PL-MTEB), a comprehensive benchmark for text embeddings in the Polish language. PL-MTEB comprises 30 diverse NLP tasks across five categories: classification, clustering, pair classification, information retrieval, and semantic text similarity. Within the scope of this work, we added 12 new Polish-language tasks to MTEB based on existing datasets and prepared two new datasets used to create four clustering tasks. We evaluated 30 publicly available text embedding models, including Polish and multilingual models. We analyzed the results in detail for specific task types and model sizes. We made the prepared datasets, the source code for evaluation, and the obtained results available to the public at https://github.com/rafalposwiata/pl-mteb.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are transforming natural language processing across diverse linguistic communities. However, they can reproduce and amplify toxic content, including hate speech, harassment, and bias, posing significant risks to multilingual applications. We provide the first comprehensive survey of the many detoxification methods specifically tailored to multilingual LLMs. First, we define toxicity its measurement, then we provide a brief review of monolingual mitigation strategies, including data filtering, style transfer, expert-based logit steering, retrieval augmentation, and alignment with human feedback. We then present an in-depth taxonomy of multilingual approaches spanning (1) training methods, (2) post-hoc editing and decoding strategies, (3) alignment and reinforcement-learning techniques, and (4) data-centric innovations, such as parallel detox corpora and synthetic data generation. Finally, we discuss open challenges in multilingual detoxification, including data scarcity, evaluation inconsistencies, cultural nuances and biases. Overall, we produce a needed overview of the state of multi-lingual toxicity detection and mitigation on which the community can ground to build globally safe and equitable LLMs.

Abstract:
Modern speech and multimodal generation systems, such as singing voice conversion and audio-driven lip synchronization, critically depend on temporally stable and semantically unambiguous vocal representations. In practical pipelines, such representations are typically derived from music source separation (MSS) applied to mixed musical recordings. However, standard MSS paradigms often aggregate lead vocals and backing harmonies into a single vocal stream. Although multi-stem separation has been explored, existing approaches remain primarily optimized for signal-level reconstruction, often overlooking the intricate structural disentanglement required by downstream generation tasks. From a generation-oriented perspective, this motivates revisiting vocal separation from a representation learning standpoint. To this end, we propose VocalRep, a structure-aware learning framework designed to disentangle lead vocals, harmonies, and accompaniment while enforcing role consistency across long-form audio. By integrating global vocal identity conditioning with ranking-based objectives, VocalRep extracts role-consistent lead vocal representations without relying on explicit pitch or symbolic annotations. Experimental results demonstrate that VocalRep significantly improves performance in downstream singing voice conversion and audio-driven lip synchronization.

Abstract:
Evidence-grounded fact-checking requires predicting claim veracity while returning faithful evidence at fine granularity, including exact sentences, table cells, and complete multi-document chains. Although large language models enable decomposition, planning, and multi-agent verification, they can still produce convincing rationales with weak provenance, especially under heterogeneous evidence and multi-hop requirements. We propose GAVEL, a multi-agent debate framework that enforces evidence grounding throughout inference. GAVEL introduces an Evidence Contract that requires debaters to state atomic subclaims and bind each to explicit evidence units, and a Mechanized Chain of Scrutiny in which a neutral Scrutinizer audits outputs and performs deterministic validation of cited identifiers and quoted spans. A Judge then selects a sufficient evidence set and produces the final decision. Experiments on FEVEROUS and HOVER in an open-book setting show that GAVEL improves provenance-aware metrics that jointly require correct labels and correct, complete evidence over strong recent baselines. Ablations confirm that both evidence binding and mechanized citation validation are key to the gains.

Abstract:
Current safety alignment techniques for large language models (LLMs) struggle to balance harmlessness and helpfulness: improving safety often comes at the cost of degraded utility. Our preliminary study shows that guiding unaligned base models with safety-aware reasoning that includes explicit self-reflection can effectively defend jailbreak attacks while preserving response quality. This observation motivates internalizing and strengthening self-reflective reasoning capabilities within LLMs to achieve a better safety–utility trade-off. We propose Safety-aware Reflective Reasoning Optimization (SaRO), a two-stage framework: (1) Reasoning-style Warmup (RW) to internalize self-reflective reasoning, and (2) Self-reflective Reasoning Process Optimization (SRPO) to encourage reflection and correction. Experiments show that SaRO outperforms existing reasoning-based alignment methods, achieving a better balance of safety and helpfulness.

Abstract:
Emergency response is a safety-critical public governance task that demands accurate and timely decision-making based on complex event information. This process involves multiple stages, including information collection, integration, analysis, risk assessment, and decision recommendation. Existing research has predominantly concentrated on the earlier stages, while studies focusing on the decision support phase remain underexplored, primarily due to the lack of suitable datasets for reliable and compliance-aware decision-oriented modeling and evaluation. To bridge this gap, we introduce the first real-world Emergency Decision-Making dataset EDM-Bench, comprising 1,179 instances spanning diverse task formats, including judgment, choice, short-answer, and structured emergency report generation. We also construct a structured rule repository, EDM-R², which contains 3,406 parsed emergency regulations to enhance decision reliability. Building on these resources, we propose a rule-enhanced reasoning framework, R³V-EDM, which integrates external regulatory knowledge with constrained inference mechanisms to improve both decision safety and interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate the inherent complexity of emergency decision-making and validate the effectiveness of our approach in enabling more reliable and trustworthy decisions.

Abstract:
In high-stakes domains like medicine, it may be generally desirable for models to faithfully adhere to the context provided. But what happens if the context does not align with model priors or safety protocols? In this paper, we investigate how LLMs behave and reason when presented with counterfactual (or even adversarial) medical evidence. We first construct MedCounterFact, a counterfactual medical QA dataset that requires the models to answer clinical comparison questions (i.e., judge the efficacy of certain treatments, with evidence consisting of randomized controlled trials provided as context). In MedCounterFact, real-world medical interventions within the questions and evidence are systematically replaced with four types of counterfactual stimuli, ranging from unknown words to toxic substances. Our evaluation across multiple frontier LLMs on MedCounterFact reveals that in the presence of counterfactual evidence, existing models overwhelmingly accept such "evidence" at face value even when it is dangerous or implausible, and provide confident and uncaveated answers. While it may be prudent to draw a boundary between faithfulness and safety, our findings suggest that models arguably overemphasize the former.

Abstract:
Transcending the single-preference paradigm, aligning LLMs with diverse human values is pivotal for robust deployment. Contemporary Multi-Objective Preference Alignment (MPA) approaches predominantly rely on static linear scalarization or rigid gradient projection to navigate these trade-offs. However, by enforcing strict conflict avoidance or simultaneous descent, these paradigms often prematurely converge to local stationary points. While mathematically stable, these points represent a conservative compromise where the model sacrifices potential global Pareto improvements to avoid transient local trade-offs. To break this deadlock, we propose Pareto-Lenient Consensus (PLC), a game-theoretic framework that reimagines alignment as a dynamic negotiation process. Unlike rigid approaches, PLC introduces consensus-driven lenient gradient rectification, which dynamically tolerates local degradation provided there is a sufficient dominant coalition surplus, thereby empowering the optimization trajectory to escape local suboptimal equilibrium and explore the distal Pareto-optimal frontier. Theoretical analysis validates PLC can facilitate stalemate escape and asymptotically converge to a Pareto consensus equilibrium. Moreover, extensive experiments show that PLC surpasses baselines in both fixed-preference alignment and global Pareto frontier quality. This work highlights the potential of negotiation-driven alignment as a promising avenue for MPA. Our codes are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/aaa-6BB8 .

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) offers a promising framework for optimizing large language models in reasoning tasks. However, existing RLVR algorithms focus on different granularities, and each has complementary strengths and limitations. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) updates the policy with token-level importance ratios, which preserves fine-grained credit assignment but often suffers from high variance and instability. In contrast, Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) applies single sequence-level importance ratios across all tokens in a response that better matches sequence-level rewards, but sacrifices token-wise credit assignment. In this paper, we propose Dynamic Hybrid Policy Optimization (DHPO) to bridge GRPO and GSPO within a single clipped surrogate objective. DHPO combines token-level and sequence-level importance ratios using weighting mechanisms. We explore two variants of the mixing mechanism, including an averaged mixing and an entropy-guided mixing. To further stabilize training, we employ a branch-specific clipping strategy that constrains token-level and sequence-level ratios within separate trust regions before mixing, preventing outliers in either branch from dominating the update. Across seven challenging mathematical reasoning benchmarks, experiments on both dense and MoE models from the Qwen3 series show that DHPO consistently outperforms GRPO and GSPO. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/XMUDeepLIT/DHPO.

Abstract:
Recently, large language models have made remarkable progress in reasoning, largely driven by scaling data and model size. In parallel, several studies argue that for smaller models, high-quality distillation can yield strong reasoning performance with minimal resources. However, a framework for understanding machine reasoning that explains why low-resource distillation can boost model performance is still missing. In this paper, we conduct a controlled case study: using less than 920 examples, a simple distillation based on the base model can actually achieve notable reasoning performance improvement, compared with the base model and even the zero-RL models. By analyzing the token frequency in model outputs, we find that the distilled model shows more flexible reasoning. It uses anthropomorphic tokens and logical connectors much more often than the base and zero-RL model. Further analysis reveals that distillation enhances the presence of two advanced cognitive behaviors: Multi-Perspective Thinking or Attempting and Metacognitive Awareness. Frequent occurrences of these two advanced cognitive behaviors give rise to flexible reasoning, which is essential for solving reasoning problems.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating them with an external knowledge base to improve the answer relevance and accuracy. In real-world scenarios, beyond pure text, a substantial amount of knowledge is stored in tables, and user questions often require retrieving answers that are distributed across multiple tables. Retrieving knowledge from a table corpora (i.e., various individual tables) for a question remains nascent, for (i) how to understand intra- and inter-table knowledge effectively, (ii) how to filter unnecessary tables and retrieve the most relevant tables efficiently, (iii) how to organize complex retrieved contexts for LLMs’ reasoning, and (iv) how to evaluate the corresponding performance in a realistic setting. Facing the above challenges, in this paper, we first propose a table-corpora-aware RAG framework, named T-RAG, which consists of the hierarchical memory index, multi-stage retrieval, and graph-aware context organization for effective and efficient table knowledge retrieval and inference. Then, we develop a multi-table question answering benchmark named MultiTableQA, which spans 3 different task types, 57,193 tables, and 23,758 questions in total, and the sources are all from real-world scenarios. Based on MultiTableQA, we perform a comprehensive comparison of table retrieval methods, RAG-based approaches, and table-to-graph representation learning methods. T-RAG consistently achieves state-of-the-art accuracy, recall, and runtime performance, with improvements of up to 9.4%. Moreover, T-RAG yields an average inference gain of 11.8% across different downstream backbone LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/jiaruzouu/T-RAG.

Abstract:
Human preference data is essential for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values, but collecting such data is often costly and inefficient-motivating the need for efficient data selection methods that reduce annotation costs while preserving alignment effectiveness. To address this issue, we propose Alignment Data Map, a data analysis tool for identifying and selecting effective preference data. We first evaluate alignment scores of the preference data by LLM-as-a-judge, explicit reward model, and reference-based approaches. The Alignment Data Map considers both response quality and inter-response variability based on the alignment scores. From our experimental findings, training on only 33% of samples that exhibit high-quality and low-variability, achieves comparable or superior alignment performance on MT-Bench, Evol-Instruct, and AlpacaEval, compared to training with the full dataset. In addition, Alignment Data Map detects potential label misannotations by analyzing correlations between annotated labels and alignment scores, improving annotation accuracy. The implementation is available at https://github.com/01choco/Alignment-Data-Map.

Abstract:
Scientific peer reviews frequently contain conflicting expert judgments, and the increasing scale of conference submissions makes it challenging for Area Chairs and editors to reliably identify and interpret such disagreements. Existing approaches typically frame reviewer disagreement as binary contradiction detection over isolated sentence pairs, abstracting away the review-level context and obscuring differences in the severity of evaluative conflict. In this work, we introduce a fine-grained formulation of reviewer contradiction analysis that operates over full peer reviews by explicitly identifying contradiction evidence spans and assigning graded disagreement intensity scores. To support this task, we present RevCI, an expert-annotated benchmark of peer-review pairs with evidence-level contradiction annotations with graded intensity labels. We further propose IMPACT, a structured multi-agent framework that integrates aspect-conditioned evidence extraction, deliberative reasoning, and adjudication to model reviewer contradictions and their intensity. To support efficient deployment, we distill IMPACT into TIDE, a small language model that predicts contradiction evidence and intensity in a single forward pass. Experimental results show that IMPACT substantially outperforms strong single-agent and generic multi-agent baselines in both evidence identification and intensity agreement, while TIDE achieves competitive performance at significantly lower inference cost.

Abstract:
Sparse attention offers a promising strategy to extend long-context capabilities in Transformer LLMs, yet its efficiency–accuracy trade-offs remain unclear due to the lack of comprehensive evaluation. We address this gap with the largest-scale empirical analysis to date of training-free sparse attention, evaluating six methods across multiple model families and sizes, sequences up to 128K tokens, and sparsity levels up to 0.95 (i.e., 1/20 attention budget) on nine diverse tasks. We first organise the rapidly evolving landscape of sparse attention methods into a taxonomy along four design axes. Our analysis then yields actionable insights: 1) sparse attention is effective: larger sparse models outperform smaller dense ones at equivalent cost, improving the Pareto frontier; 2) for the training-free methods we study, fine-grained per-query importance estimation during prefilling remains impractical—due to both the cost of estimation and the lack of sparse kernels that translate fine-grained sparsity into wall-clock gains—forcing a task-dependent choice between global-to-token and block-to-block selection. Instead, during decoding, token-to-page selection becomes feasible, enabling better generalisation and higher sparsity tolerance; 3) longer sequences tolerate higher sparsity, suggesting that fixed-budget methods in production are suboptimal. Together, these findings provide practical guidance for deploying sparse attention and methodological recommendations for future evaluations. Our code is available at https://github.com/PiotrNawrot/sparse-frontier.

Abstract:
Reasoning-oriented language models typically expose explicit reasoning as a long, front-loaded chain of “thinking” tokens before the main output, either always enabled or externally toggled at inference time. Although this can help on arithmetic, coding, and other multi-step tasks, it is costly, weakens claim-level auditability, and does not allow the model to re-trigger explicit reasoning once presentation has begun. In dialogue, these limitations are compounded by weak sensitivity to temporal structure: unless time is explicitly stated in text, standard models treat replies separated by seconds and replies separated by weeks as equivalent. We introduce TIME (Temporally Intelligent Meta-reasoning Engine), a behavioral alignment framework that learns explicit reasoning as a context-triggered control policy rather than a fixed response mode. TIME augments dialogue with optional ISO 8601 ‘‘ tags, tick events that represent silent time passage, and short ‘‘ blocks that may appear anywhere in a response. Using a four-phase curriculum, including a small maximally diverse full-batch alignment stage, we train Qwen3 dense models to invoke brief, in-place reasoning bursts only when contextual cues warrant them, while keeping user-facing output compact. We also introduce TIMEBench, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating reasoning from temporal cues in dialogue. Across 4B-32B scales, TIME improves TIMEBench scores over the corresponding base Qwen3 models in both thinking and no-thinking modes while reducing explicit reasoning tokens by roughly an order of magnitude. Beyond score improvements, TIME induces a distinct behavioral shift: explicit reasoning becomes more compact and more responsive to contextual cues. Code, training data, and benchmark artifacts are publicly available.

Abstract:
Multimodal reasoning aims to enhance the capabilities of MLLMs by incorporating intermediate reasoning steps before reaching the final answer. It has evolved from text-only reasoning to the integration of visual information, enabling the thought process to be conveyed through both images and text. Despite its effectiveness, current multimodal reasoning methods depend on explicit reasoning steps that require labor-intensive vision-text annotations and inherently introduce significant inference latency. To address these issues, we introduce multimodal latent reasoning with the advantages of multimodal representation, reduced annotation, and inference efficiency. To facilicate it, we propose Interleaved Vision-Text Latent Reasoning (IVT-LR), which injects both visual and textual information in the reasoning process within the latent space. Specifically, IVT-LR represents each reasoning step by combining two implicit parts: latent text (the hidden states from the previous step) and latent vision (a set of selected image embeddings). We further introduce a progressive multi-stage training strategy to enable MLLMs to perform the above multimodal latent reasoning steps. Experiments on M 3 CoT and ScienceQA demonstrate that our IVT-LR method achieves an average performance increase of 5.45% in accuracy, while simultaneously achieving a speed increase of over 5 times compared to existing approaches. The code are attached in the supplementary file for the review.

Abstract:
Curiosity serves as a fundamental construct in human cognition.Inspired by curiosity, reinforcement learning with intrinsic rewards for large language models (LLMs) has shown substantial potential.However, it remains unclear whether existing curiosity-driven methods genuinely reflect curiosity-like behaviors in LLMs, and to what extent psychological notions of curiosity can be transferred to these models. In this work, we propose a psychology-inspired framework to evaluate and leverage curiosity in LLMs.We adapt the Five-Dimensional Curiosity scale Revised (5DCR) to LLMs and combine questionnaire-based self reports with behavioral study.We find that although LLMs can exhibit curiosity-like behavioral patterns resembling those of humans, such patterns do not reflect an intrinsic trait of curiosity.Building on this insight, we design a curiosity-driven thinking pipeline to examine the functional role of human-like curious behaviors. Experiments show that instructing LLMs to emulate curious strategies leads to better performance on selected downstream tasks, indicating that mimicking curious behaviors holds promise for reasoning enhancement.

Abstract:
Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning is pivotal for the success of recent reasoning models but suffers from high computational overhead and latency. While prior works attempt to compress CoT via external compressor, they often fail to align with the model’s internal reasoning dynamics, resulting in the loss of critical logical steps. This paper presents C ompressing R edundancy in Chain-of-Thought via I ntrinsic S aliency P runing ( CRISP ), a framework that compresses CoT by exploiting the model’s intrinsic saliency. Our analysis reveals a distinct phenomenon: the reasoning termination token acts as an information anchor, where its attention pattern effectively demarcates essential reasoning from redundancy. Based on this finding, we design a policy that utilizes these intrinsic attention signals to guide atomic compression operations. In contrast to coarse-grained pruning strategies, CRISP strategically distills the reasoning chain to maximize information density while preserving logical coherence. Empirical results across various backbone models and mathematical datasets demonstrate that CRISP achieves a 50-60% reduction in token count without compromising accuracy, effectively mitigating the efficiency bottleneck of long-context reasoning. We open-source our implementation to facilitate further research in efficient reasoning.

Abstract:
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress, current preference optimization methods still struggle to align directional consistency while preserving reasoning diversity. To address this limitation, we propose Directional-Groupwise Preference Optimization (DGPO), a lightweight framework that aggregates supervision signals at the group level and explicitly models direction-aware alignment through multi-candidate comparisons. DGPO organizes forward and reverse question-answer instances into structured sets and optimizes a margin-based likelihood objective that separates coherent reasoning paths from inconsistent alternatives. This groupwise formulation captures richer relative information than pairwise objectives and reinforces consistency across diverse reasoning pathways. Empirical results show that our constructed reverse data yields a 3.2% average improvement across five benchmarks, while DGPO further delivers consistent gains across multiple datasets and model families, achieving average accuracy improvements of up to 3.6%. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Demi-deng2/DGPO .

Abstract:
Despite displaying semantic competence, large language models’ internal mechanisms that ground abstract semantic structure remain insufficiently characterised. To investigate whether and how LLMs develop causally functional representations of semantic roles, we introduce a causal-temporal methodology combining contrastive minimal pairs, edge-attribution circuit discovery, and training-time tracking. Our analysis reveals that LLMs encode semantic roles through highly localised circuits (89–92% attribution within 28 nodes) that emerge gradually via structural refinement rather than phase transitions. These circuits exhibit moderate cross-scale conservation (24–51% component overlap) alongside high spectral similarity, with larger models reusing similar components while rewiring connections. These findings suggest that LLMs form compact, causally isolated mechanisms for abstract semantic structure that exhibit partial transfer across scales and architectures.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) already possess a latent capacity for long chain-of-thought reasoning. Prior work has shown that outcome-based reinforcement learning (RL) can incidentally elicit advanced reasoning behaviors such as self-correction, backtracking, and verification–phenomena often referred to as the model’s ”aha moment”. However, the timing and consistency of these emergent behaviors remain unpredictable and uncontrollable, limiting the scalability and reliability of LRMs’ reasoning capabilities. To address these limitations, we move beyond reliance on prompts and unpredictable ”aha moments”. Instead, we explicitly align models with three meta-abilities: deduction, induction, and abduction , using automatically generated, self-verifiable tasks. Our three-stage pipeline (individual alignment, parameter-space merging, domain-specific reinforcement learning) boosts performance by over 10% relative to instruction-tuned baselines. Furthermore, domain-specific RL from the aligned checkpoint yields an additional gain in performance ceiling for both 7B and 32B models across math, coding, and science benchmarks, showing that explicit meta-ability alignment offers a scalable and dependable foundation for reasoning. Code and data can be found in Software and Data part in submission page.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can exhibit imbalanced biases against vulnerable groups, but how they rationalize stereotypes and rights restrictions targeting mental health entities remains underexplored. We audit a broad suite of open-weight LLMs on stereotype-justification prompts tied to mental health identities. We find that several widely used models endorse harmful stereotypes when explicitly asked to justify them, with endorsement varying across model families, versions, and mental health conditions. Finally, we show that widely used harmful-content evaluation and moderation frameworks often miss these nuanced, discriminatory responses, highlighting a gap in current AI safety evaluation for mental health groups.

Abstract:
Existing MT evaluation frameworks, including automatic metrics and human evaluation schemes such as Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM), are largely language-agnostic. However, they often fail to capture dialect- and culture-specific errors in diglossic languages (e.g., Arabic), where translation failures stem from mismatches in language variety, content coverage, and pragmatic appropriateness rather than surface form alone.We introduce LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for MT. LQM is a hierarchical error taxonomy for diagnosing MT errors through six linguistically grounded levels: sociolinguistics, pragmatics, semantics, morphosyntax, orthography, and graphetics (Figure 1).We construct a bidirectional parallel corpus of 3,850 sentences (550 per variety) spanning seven Arabic dialects (Egyptian, Emirati, Jordanian, Mauritanian, Moroccan, Palestinian, and Yemeni), derived from conversational, culturally rich content. We evaluate six LLMs in a zero-shot setting and conduct expert span-level human annotation using LQM, producing 6,113 labeled error spans across 3,495 unique erroneous sentences, along with severity-weighted quality scores. We complement this analysis with an automatic metric (spBLEU). Though validated here on Arabic, LQM is a language-agnostic framework designed to be easily applied to or adapted for other languages. LQM annotated errors data, prompts, and annotation guidelines are publicly available at https://github.com/UBC-NLP/LQM_MT

Abstract:
As large language models are increasingly adopted and trusted in real-world applications, understanding their behavior beyond single-turn prompting has become critical. Existing safety evaluations primarily focus on refusal-based methods that test whether models avoid responding to inappropriate or violent requests, leaving open questions about how models behave in interactive social settings. In this paper, we observe the adversarial behavior of LLM models through a multi-agent simulation across five diverse social deduction conversational games, acting as testbeds that provide social pressures and survival stress based on game design without explicit prompt injections. From these interactions, we construct a closed behavioral taxonomy derived through open card sorting, applied uniformly across models using a meta-LLM for behavior labeling. This approach displays that models exhibit distinct behavioral profiles and that models’ different ways of structured deliberation influence both social stability and competitive success.

Abstract:
Despite its simplicity and efficacy, the high token expenditure of self-consistency can limit its practical utility. We investigate whether early hypothesis pruning can improve the token efficiency of self-consistency for long chain-of-thought reasoning tasks, while preserving its parallelism. Concretely, we generate all solutions in parallel but periodically prune intermediate hypotheses based on two lightweight indicators: (a) the model’s confidence in each hypothesis, and (b) the lexical coverage of all current hypotheses by candidate subsets. We design a fast weighted set cover algorithm that utilizes the two indicators; evaluation of five LLMs on three math benchmarks shows that our method improves token efficiency in most cases, with reductions of 10-35% in many.

Abstract:
Multimodal tables i.e. tabular layouts interleaved with charts, maps, icons, and color encodings are ubiquitous in real applications yet remain difficult for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Despite advances in text and image understanding, systematic evaluation of table-centric multimodal reasoning is limited. We introduce MMTabReal, a MultiModal Table Benchmark, human-curated suite of 500 real-world tables paired with 4021 question–answer pairs. MMtabReal spans four question types, five reasoning categories, and eight structural archetypes. Evaluations of state-of-the-art models reveal substantial gaps, especially in visual grounding, spatial alignment, and multi-step inference, with 20–40% performance drops relative to existing benchmarks. These results highlight the need for architectures that more tightly fuse vision with tabular structure and support explicit numeric/logical operations. MMtabReal is released for evaluation only, providing a rigorous, reproducible testbed that reflects the linguistic, structural, and reasoning complexity of real-world multimodal tables. Code and data are available at: https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/mmtabreal/

Abstract:
Tokenization fundamentally shapes NLP performance, affecting both efficiency and linguistic fidelity. While Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) underpins most Large Language Models (LLMs), its frequency-driven merges often disregard morpheme boundaries, yielding inconsistent and semantically opaque segmentations in morphologically rich languages. We introduce MorphBPE, a simple extension of BPE that constrains merge operations during tokenizer training to respect morpheme boundaries, while leaving inference unchanged and fully compatible with existing LLM pipelines. We evaluate tokenization quality using two intrinsic metrics, Morphological Consistency F1, which measures whether shared morphemes are assigned consistent token representations, and Morphological Edit Distance, which quantifies alignment with morpheme boundaries. We then train 300M and 1B parameter decoder-only LMs from scratch across four typologically diverse languages, English, Russian, Hungarian, and Arabic, under identical vocabulary sizes and training settings. Across all languages, MorphBPE consistently improves intrinsic morphological coherence and reduces language model cross-entropy, moreover, token length statistics indicate that these gains are not attributable to materially shorter tokens. Finally, on the Belebele multilingual reading comprehension benchmark, MorphBPE yields significant improvements in morphologically rich languages such as Russian and Arabic.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) approaches to tabular summarization rely on extensive prompt engineering, decomposition pipelines, or entity-level intermediate representations to achieve strong performance. While effective, these strategies are computationally expensive and offer limited insight into how well models maintain state over long, evolving narratives. We introduce SporTabSet, a diagnostic benchmark for long-context tabular summarization across two complementary sports domains that require tracking multiple entities and aggregating statistics under domain-specific rules. Using SporTabSet, we systematically evaluate decomposition-based strategies across several long context LLMs. Results show that although decomposition substantially improves accuracy and numerical fidelity, gains stem mainly from dissecting multi-entity interference rather than improved local arithmetic. Robustness experiments further reveal high sensitivity to surface-level cues with structured failures, including hallucination, omission, and role confusion. Together, these findings identify consistent multi-entity memory as a key bottleneck in long-context table generation, motivating diagnostic evaluation as a prerequisite for scalable, efficient, and reliable tabular summarization models.

Abstract:
Qualitative analysis is critical to understanding human datasets in many social science disciplines. A central method in this process is inductive coding, where researchers identify and interpret codes directly from the datasets themselves. Yet, this exploratory approach poses challenges for meeting methodological expectations (such as "depth" and "variation"), especially as researchers increasingly adopt Generative AI (GAI) for support. Ground-truth-based metrics are insufficient because they contradict the exploratory nature of inductive coding; cluster- or topic-level metrics fail to capture the interpretive, cross-cutting nature of qualitative codes; and manual evaluation can be labor-intensive. This paper presents a theory-informed computational method for measuring inductive coding results from humans and GAI. Our method first merges individual codebooks into an Aggregated Code Space using an LLM-enriched hierarchical clustering algorithm. It then measures each coder’s contribution against the merged result using four novel metrics: Coverage, Overlap, Novelty, and Divergence, designed to capture breadth, consensus, unique contribution, and systematic deviation without assuming ground truth. Through two experiments on a human-coded online conversation dataset, we 1) reveal the merging algorithm’s impact on metrics; 2) validate the metrics’ stability and robustness across multiple runs and different LLMs; and 3) showcase the metrics’ ability to diagnose coding issues, such as excessive or irrelevant (hallucinated) codes. We discuss how these metrics should be interpreted in combination and their current limitations. Our work provides a reliable pathway for ensuring methodological rigor in human-AI qualitative analysis.

Abstract:
Memory-augmented language agents are increasingly deployed in affective applications such as emotional support, where understanding and responding to users’ latent emotional needs is critical. However, existing research often treats memory as a tool for factual retrieval, overlooking its role in shaping users’ emotional experiences. In this work, we introduce ENPMR-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating Emotional Need-aware Proactive Memory Retrieval (ENPMR), a core capability that enables agents to infer users’ latent emotional needs and proactively retrieve appropriate memories to support empathetic interaction. Grounded in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, ENPMR-Bench includes over 1,800 memory-augmented dialogues and defines structured mappings between emotional needs and supportive memory types. Experimental results demonstrate that current retrieval paradigms, including both embedding-based and LLM-driven approaches, exhibit substantial deficiencies, with empathy scores significantly lagging behind golden memory conditions. While chain-of-thought prompting improves the alignment between inferred emotional needs and retrieved memories to some extent, a notable performance gap remains. Together, these findings reveal critical limitations in current agents and outline directions for advancing personalized emotional support through need-sensitive memory retrieval.

Abstract:
Text-embedding models frequently inherit societal biases, yet the influence of socio-economic markers remains largely unexplored. This paper identifies Currency Bias as a systemic representational limitation in financial AI, where models exhibit associative sensitivity to economic hierarchies. We analyze this through three dimensions: (1) the Syntax Gap, where models fail to align currency names, symbols, and acronyms; (2) Associative Sensitivity, where embeddings disproportionately link specific currency identifiers to narratives of risk or poverty; and (3) Downstream volatility, where currency substitutions induce predictive entropy, sentence misunderstanding, sentiment shifts, and credit default prediction flips in downstream tasks. Benchmarking 14 state-of-the-art architectures reveals a pervasive phenomenon of representational disparity, affecting several currencies. These findings suggest that current embedding practices inadvertently encode inequalities, posing significant risks for the fairness and reliability of global financial NLP applications.

Abstract:
We investigate the integration of human-like working memory constraints into the Transformer architecture and implement several cognitively inspired attention variants, including fixed-width windows based and temporal decay based attention mechanisms. Our modified GPT-2 models are trained from scratch on developmentally plausible datasets (10M and 100M words). Performance is evaluated on grammatical judgment tasks (BLiMP) and alignment with human reading time data. Our results indicate that these cognitively-inspired constraints, particularly fixed-width attention, can significantly improve grammatical accuracy especially when training data is scarce. These constrained models also tend to show a stronger alignment with human processing metrics. The findings suggest that such constraints may serve as a beneficial inductive bias, guiding models towards more robust linguistic representations, especially in data-limited settings.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping recommender systems by leveraging extensive world knowledge and semantic reasoning to interpret user intent. However, effectively integrating these capabilities with collaborative signals while avoiding prohibitive inference latency remains a critical bottleneck. To address this, we propose a trajectory-driven internalization framework to develop a Single-agent Trajectory-Aligned Recommender (STAR). Specifically, to internalize complex reasoning capabilities into a single efficient model, we first design a multi-agent teacher system capable of multi-turn tool usage and reflection. This teacher utilizes a Collaborative Signal Translation mechanism to explicitly convert latent behavioral patterns into descriptive natural language evidence to enhance reasoning accuracy. Subsequently, a trajectory-driven distillation pipeline transfers this agentic logic, including planning, tool usage, and self-reflection, into the compact STAR model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that STAR surpasses its teacher by 8.7% to 39.5% while eliminating iterative latency, paving the way for real-time, reasoning-enhanced recommendation.

Abstract:
In fine-grained sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, a large pool of specialized experts replaces a small homogeneous set, shifting performance and throughput to be governed by inference-time expert activation. Yet most existing optimization recipes implicitly assume a fixed activation budget (e.g., a constant Top- k per layer), whose behavior in fine-grained MoEs is poorly understood. We first characterize runtime skipping strategies, quantifying the accuracy–efficiency trade-off of (i) uniform fixed activation and (ii) static layer-wise Top- k allocation found by search. Our analysis reveals that static skipping can already provide substantial throughput gains, but optimal static schedules vary significantly across models and routing mechanisms. We therefore introduce Adaptive Skipping with Entropy-Penalized Thresholding (ASET), a training-free policy that adapts token-level activation using router confidence and entropy while remaining within the model’s original budget. Across the fine-grained MoEs we study, static skipping policies yield 10–78% throughput gains with minimal performance degradation, including ≥ 10% improvement on DeepSeek-V3 without measurable loss. On the OLMoE testbed, ASET yields a Pareto frontier between average activation and task quality. Overall, these results identify expert skipping as a practical lever for faster fine-grained MoE inference, with adaptive activation helping when fixed budgets are too rigid.

Abstract:
Understanding financial documents is critical for high-stakes decision-making yet hindered by systemic semantic implicitness: key facts are rarely explicit in surface text and often determined by global structural cues. Missing these cues invites semantic misinterpretations, such as misreading what a number refers to, an outcome unacceptable in high-stakes environments. However, existing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems typically treat structure as a physical navigational skeleton rather than intrinsic semantic knowledge. To address this, we introduce Fin-STAR (Financial STructure-As-Semantics Retrieval), a framework redefining hierarchy as intrinsic semantics. Fin-STAR incorporates a novel Structure-Enriched Semantic Indexing mechanism that augments the hierarchical lineage with snippet-derived virtual nodes, and injects this enriched context via a semantic cross-attention paradigm, rendering implicit cues explicit. By grounding evidence within its structural scope, we preserve factual invariance and ensure contextual integrity. Addressing the lack of granular public datasets, we conduct experiments on FinTierQA Gold, a curated expert benchmark. Results show that Fin-STAR outperforms state-of-the-art hierarchical and graph-based baselines across diverse query complexities, document types, and markets. Notably, ablations confirm that our semantic injection consistently outperforms alternative strategies. Finally, we release FinTierQA, comprising 3.9M pairs automatically constructed from 78k documents via our framework .

Abstract:
Legal case retrieval remains challenging due to the complexity of legal language and the need for precise lexical alignment between queries and relevant cases. Although dense retrieval models have achieved notable progress, empirical studies show that BM25 continues to serve as a strong baseline in this domain. It motivates us to propose a self-evolving framework for rule-driven query rewriting that enhances BM25 without any parameter training. The framework equips an LLM-based agent with an automatic evaluation environment, enabling it to iteratively create rewriting rules , plan validation experiments over rule combinations, and eliminate ineffective rules based on historical feedbacks. We evaluate our method on the Chinese legal case retrieval benchmark LeCaRD-v2. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms non-evolutionary baselines, including human-designed rules and greedy rule selection, particularly when powered by a high-capacity core LLM. We also conduct detailed analyses to investigate the mechanisms underlying self-evolution. Our findings reveal that LLM’s capabilities to leverage previous experimental results and its intrinsic knowledge of rule elimination play critical roles in refining the rule set via self-evolution.

Abstract:
Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to extract text-based entities, assign them semantic categories, and ground them to corresponding visual regions. In this work, we explore the potential of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to perform GMNER in an end-to-end manner, moving beyond their typical role as auxiliary tools within cascaded pipelines.Crucially, our investigation reveals a fundamental challenge: MLLMs exhibit modality bias , including visual bias and textual bias, which stems from their tendency to take unimodal shortcuts rather than rigorous cross-modal verification.To address this, we propose Modality-aware Consistency Reasoning ( MCR ), which enforces structured cross-modal reasoning through Multi-style Reasoning Schema Injection (MRSI) and Constraint-guided Verifiable Optimization (CVO). MRSI transforms abstract constraints into executable reasoning chains, while CVO empowers the model to dynamically align its reasoning trajectories with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO).Experiments on GMNER and visual grounding tasks demonstrate that MCR effectively mitigates modality bias and achieves superior performance compared to existing baselines.

Abstract:
Code secrets are sensitive assets for software developers, and their leakage poses significant cybersecurity risks. While the rapid development of AI code assistants powered by Code Large Language Models (CLLMs), CLLMs are shown to inadvertently leak such secrets due to a notorious memorization phenomenon. This study first reveals that Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenization leads to unexpected behavior of secret memorization, which we term as gibberish bias . Specifically, we identified that some secrets are among the easiest for CLLMs to memorize. These secrets yield high character-level entropy, but low token-level entropy. Then, this paper supports the biased claim with numerical data. We identified that the roots of the bias are the token distribution shift between the CLLM training data and the secret data. We further discuss how gibberish bias manifests under the “larger vocabulary” trend. To conclude the paper, we discuss potential mitigation strategies and the broader implications on current tokenizer design.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful tool for synthetic data generation. A particularly important use case is producing synthetic replicas of private text, which requires carefully balancing privacy and utility. We propose Realistic and Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation (RPSG), which uses private seeds and integrates privacy-preserving strategies, including a formal differential privacy (DP) mechanism in the candidate selection, to generate realistic synthetic data. Comprehensive experiments against state-of-the-art private synthetic data generation methods demonstrate that RPSG achieves high fidelity to private data while providing strong privacy protection.

Abstract:
The adoption of large language models (LLMs) is transforming the peer review process, from assisting reviewers in writing detailed evaluations to generating entire reviews automatically. While these capabilities offer new opportunities, they also raise concerns about fairness and reliability. In this paper, we investigate bias in LLM-generated peer reviews through controlled interventions on author metadata, including affiliation, gender, seniority, and publication history. Our analysis consistently shows a strong affiliation bias favoring authors from highly ranked institutions. We also identify directional preferences associated with seniority and prior publication record, which can influence acceptance decisions for borderline papers. Gender effects are smaller but present in several models. Notably, implicit biases become more pronounced when examining token-level soft ratings, suggesting that alignment may mask but not fully eliminate underlying preferences.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) in code generation, existing evaluations focus on functional correctness or syntactic validity, overlooking how LLMs make critical design choices such as which library or programming language to use.To fill this gap, we perform the first empirical study of LLMs’ preferences for libraries and programming languages when generating code, covering eight diverse LLMs.We observe a strong tendency to overuse widely adopted libraries such as NumPy; in up to 45% of cases, this usage is not required and deviates from the ground-truth solutions.The LLMs we study also show a significant preference toward Python as their default language.For high-performance project initialisation tasks where Python is not the optimal language, it remains the dominant choice in 58% of cases, and Rust is not used once.These results highlight how LLMs prioritise familiarity and popularity over suitability and task-specific optimality;underscoring the need for targeted fine-tuning, data diversification, and evaluation benchmarks that explicitly measure language and library selection fidelity.

Abstract:
Visual text grounding provides interpretable evidence for document question answering. Due to the complex layouts and mixed visual-text contents in text-rich images, effective visual text grounding requires strong visual and spatial reasoning to localize multiple referenced regions. Existing multimodal large language model (MLLM) approaches often struggle to align query tokens with visual–text patches, heavily relying on lengthy OCR inputs. To tackle this problem, we propose Doc-AGround, an OCR-free approach that leverages the MLLM’s inherent multi-head attention for multi-patch grounding. Doc-AGround extracts a patch-wise attention map as the grounding prediction. Concurrently, it introduces an effective multi-head weighting mechanism to amplify the attention heads’ intrinsic role in connecting vision and text. Empirical results of Doc-AGround show state-of-the-art performance on challenging document grounding benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed attention-based grounding design.

Abstract:
Despite substantial advancements in aligning LLMs with human values, current safety mechanisms remain susceptible to jailbreak attacks. We attribute this vulnerability to the distributional discrepancies between alignment-oriented prompts and malicious prompts. To investigate this, and drawing inspiration from logic-driven NLP tasks, we introduce LogiBreak, a universal black-box jailbreak method that utilizes logical expression translation to bypass LLM safety mechanisms. By converting harmful natural language prompts into formal logical expressions, LogiBreak exploits the distributional gap between alignment data and logic-expressed inputs, preserving the underlying semantic intent and readability while evading safety constraints. Furthermore, to fill the gap of existing benchmarks that lack systematic resources specifically targeting logical expression-based attacks against LLM robustness, we construct a novel multilingual logical expression jailbreak dataset for evaluation. Our evaluations of LogiBreak in five languages demonstrate its effectiveness and generalizability in various linguistic contexts. The code is available at https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_Logibreak.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to distraction by contextual information during reasoning. Previous work primarily focuses on improving the generation of the next token while overlooking the potential bias introduced by existing premises. We propose a novel decoding method to mitigate such biases. Our framework uses predicted logits to estimate the model’s confidence. By decomposing the full context into multiple premises, we gain a clearer understanding of the relevance of each premise to the question. During next-token prediction, we refine the output by contrasting the logits with the highest and lowest confidence. Our method effectively reveals how the model dynamically activates and adjusts its consideration of each premise as reasoning progresses.

Abstract:
High-quality and diverse multimodal data are essential for improving vision–language models (VLMs), yet existing datasets often contain noisy, redundant, and poorly aligned samples. To address these problems, data filtering is commonly used to enhance the efficiency and performance of multimodal learning, but it introduces extra computational cost because filtering models are usually trained on the same data they are meant to screen. To reduce this cost, we study DOSE, which explores whether off-the-shelf pretrained models that have never seen the target data can be used to select training samples for larger and stronger multimodal models without any task-specific training. Even without fine-tuning, these models can effectively assess text quality and image–text alignment to guide data selection. Based on this, we build a joint quality–alignment distribution and apply adaptive weighted sampling to select informative samples while maintaining long-tail diversity. This approach greatly enhances data diversity and enables models trained on DOSE-filtered data to achieve comparable or even better results than those trained on the full dataset in standard VQA and math benchmarks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness, efficiency, and scalability of our method.

Abstract:
Multimodal content combining textual and visual information poses significant challenges for rumor detection on social media. Compared to traditional spatial domain features, frequency domain features have attracted increasing attention due to their stronger discriminative capabilities. However, existing methods still fall short in capturing cross-modal semantic inconsistencies and often overlook inherent noise in multimodal features, which limits overall detection performance. To address these issues, we propose a novel multimodal rumor detection method based on multi-scale spectral selection and entropy-guided uncertainty fusion. Specifically, we first apply the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to image and text features to convert them into the frequency domain. Then, multi-scale convolutional filters are employed to extract fine-grained information across different frequency scales. Next, modality separation is performed to capture both shared and modality-specific features, enabling more effective cross-modal representation learning. Finally, entropy is used to estimate the uncertainty of each prediction branch, calculate confidence scores, and perform adaptive weighted fusion accordingly. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches in multimodal rumor detection, demonstrating stronger detection capability and robustness.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by grounding them in external knowledge. However, its application in sensitive domains is limited by privacy risks. Existing private RAG methods typically rely on query-time differential privacy (DP), which requires repeated noise injection and leads to accumulated privacy loss. To address this issue, we propose DP-SynRAG, a framework that uses LLMs to generate differentially private synthetic RAG databases. Unlike prior methods, the synthetic text can be reused once created, thereby avoiding repeated noise injection and additional privacy costs. To preserve essential information for downstream RAG tasks, DP-SynRAG extends private prediction, which instructs LLMs to generate text that mimics subsampled database records in a DP manner. Experiments show that DP-SynRAG achieves superior performance to the state-of-the-art private RAG systems while maintaining a fixed privacy budget, offering a scalable solution for privacy-preserving RAG.

Abstract:
Sentence stress refers to emphasis on words within a spoken utterance to highlight or contrast an idea. It is often used to imply an underlying intention not explicitly stated. Recent speech-aware language models (SLMs) have enabled direct audio processing, allowing models to access the full richness of speech to perform audio reasoning tasks such as spoken question answering. Despite the crucial role of sentence stress in shaping meaning and intent, it remains largely overlooked in evaluation and development of SLMs. We address this gap by introducing StressTest, a benchmark designed to evaluate models’ ability to distinguish between meanings of speech based on the stress pattern. We evaluate leading SLMs, and find that despite their overall capabilities, they perform poorly on such tasks. Hence, we propose a novel data generation pipeline, and create Stress-17k, a training set that simulates change of meaning implied by stress variation. Results suggest, that our finetuned model, StresSLM, generalizes well to real recordings and notably outperforms existing SLMs on sentence stress reasoning and detection. Models, code, data, samples - https://pages.cs.huji.ac.il/adiyoss-lab/stresstest.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) as automatic evaluators, commonly referred to as LLM-as-a-Judge, have also attracted growing attention. This approach plays a vital role in aligning LLMs with human judgments, providing accurate and reliable assessments. However, LLM-based judgment models often exhibit judgment preference bias during the evaluation phase, tending to favor responses generated by themselves, undermining the reliability of their judgments. This paper introduces the Group-Based Polling Optimization (Genii), an unsupervised multi-agent collaborative optimization framework that mitigates the inherent judgment preference bias of judgment models. Specifically, Genii integrates various LLM-based judgment models into a multi-agent system and simulates the interactive client-server polling mechanism to optimize each client agent unsupervisedly. Our experiments demonstrate that Genii outperforms supervised models trained on annotated judgment data, while requiring no human-labeled annotations. Genii consistently improves performance across different client agents during the polling, even when weaker models act as server agents. Further analysis reveals that Genii effectively mitigates judgment preference bias of LLM-based judgment models, demonstrating its effectiveness. All codes are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Genii.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong general reasoning but struggle in molecular science due to the lack of explicit priors required for precise chemical reasoning. Current solutions inject priors into parameters, but this static coupling hinders rapid knowledge updates and often compromises the model’s general capabilities. To address this, we introduce REAP, a training-free framework that equips LLMs with an external knowledge base, enabling them to reason over retrieved chemical priors dynamically. REAP implements a structured reasoning pipeline that autonomously selects relevant priors from our constructed atom-level knowledge base, retrieves analogue exemplars, and synthesizes these information to guide the LLM’s decision-making. This architecture ensures interpretability and adaptability while preserving the LLM’s intrinsic general intelligence. Experiments show that REAP outperforms current reasoning methods and rivals state-of-the-art training-based models, demonstrating the effectiveness of our framework.

Abstract:
In the high-cost simulation-driven design domain, translating ambiguous design requirements into a mathematical optimization formulation is a bottleneck for optimizing product performance. This process is time-consuming and heavily reliant on expert knowledge. While large language models (LLMs) offer potential for automating this task, existing approaches either suffer from poor formalization that fails to accurately align with the design intent or rely on solver feedback for data filtering, which is unavailable due to the high simulation costs. To address this challenge, we propose automated problem formulation (APF), a solver-independent framework that utilizes LLMs to convert engineers’ natural language requirements into executable optimization models. The core of this framework is an innovative pipeline for automatically generating high-quality data, which overcomes the difficulty of constructing suitable fine-tuning datasets in the absence of high-cost solver feedback with the help of data generation and test instance annotation. The generated high-quality dataset is used to perform supervised fine-tuning on LLMs, significantly enhancing their ability to generate accurate and executable optimization problem formulations. Experimental results on antenna design demonstrate that APF significantly outperforms the existing methods in both the accuracy of requirement formalization and the quality of resulting radiation efficiency curves in meeting the design goals.

Abstract:
Effective tool use is essential for large language models (LLMs) to interact with their environment. However, progress is limited by the lack of efficient reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks specifically designed for tool use, due to challenges in constructing stable training environments and designing verifiable reward mechanisms. To address this, we propose an automated environment construction pipeline, incorporating scenario decomposition, document generation, function integration, complexity scaling, and localized deployment. This enables the creation of high-quality training environments that provide detailed and measurable feedback without relying on external tools. Additionally, we introduce a verifiable reward mechanism that evaluates both the precision of tool use and the completeness of task execution. When combined with trajectory data collected from the constructed environments, this mechanism integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms to facilitate feedback-driven model training. Experiments on LLMs of varying scales demonstrate that our approach significantly enhances the models’ tool-use performance without degrading their general capabilities. Our analysis suggests that these gains result from improved context understanding and reasoning, driven by updates to the lower-layer MLP parameters in models. Code and data are available at https://github.com/bytedance/FTRL.

Abstract:
In the era of Large Language Models (LLMs), the Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture has emerged as an effective approach for training extremely large models with improved computational efficiency. This success builds upon extensive prior research aimed at enhancing expert specialization in MoE-based LLMs. However, the nature of such specializations and how they can be systematically interpreted remain open research challenges. In this work, we investigate this gap by posing a fundamental question: Do domain-specific experts exist in MoE-based LLMs? To answer the question, we evaluate ten advanced MoE-based LLMs ranging from 3.8B to 120B parameters and provide empirical evidence for the existence of domain-specific experts. Building on this finding, we propose Domain Steering Mixture of Experts (DSMoE), a training-free framework that introduces zero additional inference cost and outperforms both well-trained MoE-based LLMs and strong baselines, including Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). Experiments on four advanced open-source MoE-based LLMs across both target and non-target domains demonstrate that our method achieves strong performance and robust generalization without increasing inference cost or requiring additional retraining.

Abstract:
Text analysis of tabular data relies on two core operations: summarization for corpus-level theme extraction and tagging for row-level labeling. A critical limitation of employing large language models (LLMs) for these tasks is their inability to meet the high standards of output stability demanded by data analytics. To address this challenge, we introduce CAST ( C onsistency via A lgorithmic Prompting and S table T hinking), a framework that enhances output stability by constraining the model’s latent reasoning trajectory. CAST combines (i) Algorithmic Prompting to impose a procedural scaffold over valid reasoning transitions and (ii) Thinking-before-Speaking to enforce explicit intermediate commitments before final generation. To measure progress, we introduce CAST-S and CAST-T , stability metrics for bulleted summarization and tagging, and validate their alignment with human judgments. Experiments across publicly available benchmarks on multiple LLM backbones show that CAST consistently achieves the best stability among all baselines, improving Stability Score by up to 16.2%, while maintaining or improving output quality.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show potential for multi-interest analysis of users in recommender systems, going beyond heuristic assumptions in existing methods, e.g., co-occurring items indicate the same interest. Despite the effectiveness, two key challenges remain. First, the granularity of raw generation of LLMs for multi-interests is agnostic, possibly leading to overly fine or coarse interest grouping. Second, adopting LLM to analyze individual user behaviors lacks a global perspective on how items relate across users. In this paper, we propose an LLM-driven adaptive and representative multi-interest modeling framework to address these challenges. At the user-individual level, we exploit LLM analysis and alleviate the agnostic granularity by adaptively aggregating semantic clusters to collaborative multi-interests. At the user-crowd level, to mitigate the limited insights in individual behaviors, we formulate a max covering problem to expand the scope of LLM analysis with compactness and representativeness, disentangling interest representations from global perspectives. Experiments on real-world datasets show that our approach outperforms various baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often exhibit hallucinations due to their inability to accurately perceive their own knowledge boundaries. Existing abstention fine-tuning methods typically partition datasets directly based on response accuracy, causing models to suffer from severe label noise near the decision boundaries and consequently exhibit high rates of abstentions or hallucinations. This paper adopts a latent space representation perspective, revealing a "gray zone" near the decision hyperplane where internal belief ambiguity constitutes the core performance bottleneck. Based on this insight, we propose the GeoDe (Geometric Denoising) framework for abstention fine-tuning. This method constructs a truth hyperplane using linear probes and performs "geometric denoising" by employing geometric distance as a confidence signal for abstention decisions. This approach filters out ambiguous boundary samples while retaining high-fidelity signals for fine-tuning. Experiments across multiple models (Llama3, Qwen3) and benchmark datasets (TriviaQA, NQ, SciQ, SimpleQA) demonstrate that GeoDe significantly enhances model truthfulness and demonstrates strong generalization in out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/Notbesidemoon/GeoDe.

Abstract:
Propaganda detection in social media is challenging due to noisy, short texts and low annotation agreements. We introduce a new intent-focused taxonomy of propaganda techniques and compare it against an established, higher-agreement schema. Along three dimensions (model portfolio, schema effects, and prompting strategy) we evaluate the taxonomies as a classification task with the help of four language models (GPT-4.1-nano, Phi-4 14B, Qwen2.5-14B, Qwen3-14B). Our results show that fine-tuning is essential, since it transforms weak zero-shot baselines into competitive systems and reveals methodological differences that are hidden using base models. Across schemas, the Qwen models achieve the strongest overall performance, and Phi-4 14B consistently outperforms GPT-4.1-nano. Our hierarchical prompting method (HiPP), which predicts fine-grained techniques before aggregating them, is especially beneficial after fine-tuning and on the more ambiguous, low-agreement taxonomy, while remaining competitive on the simpler schema. The HQP dataset, annotated with the new intent-based labels, provides a richer lens on propaganda’s strategic goals and a challenging benchmark for future work on robust, real-world detection.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promising advancements in tackling human-level tasks, wherein generating workflows for collaborative AI systems remains a critical and challenging step. To explore this frontier, we introduce ComfyFlow, a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate current LLMs’ ability to generate executable and instruction-following AIGC workflows in ComfyUI. The dataset includes 400 diverse visual generation tasks across 20 categories, supported by 10K training examples constructed from knowledge bases, which contain detailed annotations for 2,480 nodes and 3,298 workflows. We establish a systematic evaluation protocol that quantifies performance across multiple dimensions, ranging from basic format validity to multi-level hallucination rates. Our extensive evaluations show that: 1) ComfyFlow presents a substantial challenge even for top-tier proprietary LLMs such as GPT-5.1 and the Claude series; 2) Open-source models achieve new state-of-the-art results after post-training, yet struggle with long-horizon planning as the number of nodes increases; 3) Different post-training strategies offer complementary benefits in following instructions and mitigating hallucinations. By establishing both a challenging benchmark and a principled evaluation scheme, ComfyFlow lays the foundation for developing more intelligent and reliable collaborative AI systems.

Abstract:
Culturally aware safeguards are crucial for AI alignment in real-world settings, where safety extends beyond common sense and encompasses diverse local values, norms, and region-specific regulations. However, building large-scale, culturally grounded datasets is challenging due to limited resources and a scarcity of native annotators. Consequently, many safeguard models rely on machine translation of English datasets, often missing regional and cultural nuances. We present a novel agentic data-generation framework to scalably create authentic, region-specific safety datasets for Southeast Asia (SEA). On this foundation, we introduce the SEA-Guard family, the first multilingual safeguard models grounded in SEA cultural contexts. Evaluated across multiple benchmarks and cultural variants, SEA-Guard consistently outperforms existing safeguards at detecting regionally sensitive or harmful content while maintaining strong general safety performance.

Abstract:
Prior work has explored multi-turn interaction and feedback for LLM writing, but evaluations still largely center on prompts and localized feedback, leaving persistent public reception in online communities underexamined. We test whether broadcast community discussion improves stand-up comedy writing in a controlled multi-agent sandbox: in the discussion condition, critic and audience threads are recorded, filtered, stored as social memory, and later retrieved to condition subsequent generations, whereas the baseline omits discussion. Across 50 rounds (250 paired monologues) judged by five expert annotators using A/B preference and a 15-item rubric, discussion wins 75.6% of instances and improves Craft/Clarity (Δ = 0.440) and Social Response (Δ = 0.422), with occasional increases in aggressive humor.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong results on code generation, but single model inference remains brittle on tasks that require iterative refinement. Existing multi agent frameworks improve reliability, yet they often incur substantial token and latency overhead. We introduce PairCoder, a framework that brings pair programming to autonomous LLM collaboration. PairCoder assigns one model to code generation and the other to review, and switches roles when repeated errors suggest that the current interaction has stalled. Across 13 LLMs on HumanEval, PairCoder consistently improves over single model inference. On eight representative backbones, it reaches 91.0% pass@1 and improves over single model inference by up to 20.3% while reducing token usage by 40% to 70% relative to multi agent baselines. Many heterogeneous pairings also outperform both constituent models, suggesting that the framework generalizes across model families. These results position PairCoder as an effective and deployment conscious alternative to heavier multi agent systems.Code is available at https://github.com/yisuanwang/PairCoder

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning, complex optimization tasks remain challenging, requiring domain knowledge and robust implementation. However, existing benchmarks focus narrowly on Mathematical Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, hindering comprehensive evaluation. To address this, we introduce OptiVerse, a comprehensive benchmark of 1,000 curated problems spanning neglected domains, including Stochastic Optimization, Dynamic Optimization, Game Optimization, and Optimal Control, across three difficulty levels: Easy, Medium, and Hard. The experiments with 22 LLMs of different sizes reveal sharp performance degradation on hard problems, where even advanced models like GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3 struggle to exceed 27% accuracy. Through error analysis, we identify that modeling logic errors remain the primary bottleneck. Consequently, we propose a Dual-View Auditor Agent that improves the accuracy of the LLM modeling process without introducing significant time overhead. OptiVerse will serve as a foundational platform for advancing LLMs in solving complex optimization challenges.

Abstract:
The emergence of groundbreaking large language models capable of performing complex reasoning tasks holds significant promise for addressing various scientific challenges, including those arising in complex clinical scenarios. To enable their safe and effective deployment in real-world healthcare settings, it is urgently necessary to benchmark the diagnostic capabilities of current models systematically. Given the limitations of existing medical benchmarks in evaluating advanced diagnostic reasoning, we present DiagnosisArena, a comprehensive and challenging benchmark designed to rigorously assess professional-level diagnostic competence. DiagnosisArena consists of 1,113 pairs of segmented patient cases and corresponding diagnoses, spanning 28 medical specialties, deriving from clinical case reports published in 10 top-tier medical journals. The benchmark is developed through a meticulous construction pipeline, involving multiple rounds of screening and review by both AI systems and human experts, with thorough checks conducted to prevent data leakage. Our study reveals that even the most advanced reasoning models, o3-mini, o1, and DeepSeek-R1, achieve only 45.82%, 31.09%, and 17.79% accuracy, respectively. This finding highlights a significant generalization bottleneck in current large language models when faced with clinical diagnostic reasoning challenges. Through DiagnosisArena, we aim to drive further advancements in AI’s diagnostic reasoning capabilities, enabling more effective solutions for real-world clinical diagnostic challenges. We openly share the benchmark and evaluation tools for further research and development.

Abstract:
Speech conveys not only linguistic information but also rich non-verbal vocal events such as laughing and crying. While semantic transcription is well-studied, the precise localization of non-verbal events remains a critical yet under-explored challenge. Current methods suffer from insufficient task definitions with limited category coverage and ambiguous temporal granularity. They also lack standardized evaluation frameworks, hindering the development of downstream applications. To bridge this gap, we first develop a refined taxonomy of 21 vocal events, with a new categorization into discrete (standalone) versus continuous (mixed with speech) types. Based on the refined taxonomy, we introduce WESR-Bench, an expert-annotated evaluation set (900+ utterances) with a novel position-aware protocol that disentangles ASR errors from event detection, enabling precise localization measurement for both discrete and continuous events. We also build a strong baseline by constructing a 1,700+ hour corpus, and train specialized models, surpassing both open-source audio-language models and commercial APIs while preserving ASR quality. We anticipate that WESR will serve as a foundational resource for future research in modeling rich, real-world auditory scenes.

Abstract:
The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in interactive systems necessitates a deep alignment with the nuanced and dynamic preferences of individual users. Current alignment techniques predominantly address universal human values or static, single-turn preferences, thereby failing to address the critical needs of long-term personalization and the initial user cold-start problem. To bridge this gap, we propose PersonalAgent, a novel user-centric lifelong agent designed to continuously infer and adapt to user preferences. PersonalAgent constructs and dynamically refines a unified user profile by decomposing dialogues into single-turn interactions, framing preference inference as a sequential decision-making task. Experiments show that PersonalAgent achieves superior performance over strong prompt-based and policy optimization baselines, not only in idealized but also in noisy conversational contexts, while preserving cross-session preference consistency. Furthermore, human evaluation confirms that PersonalAgent excels at capturing user preferences naturally and coherently. Our findings underscore the importance of lifelong personalization for developing more inclusive and adaptive conversational agents. Our code and ALOE-Unseen dataset are released here.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become an effective approach for advancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) through the strategic integration of external search engines. However, current RL-based search agents often rely on a process of stochastic exploration guided by carefully crafted outcome rewards, leading to inefficient reasoning trajectories and unstable training. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework, Hierarchical Experience (HiExp), to enhance the performance and training stability of search agents. Specifically, we extract empirical knowledge through contrastive analysis and a multi-level clustering mechanism, transforming raw reasoning trajectories into hierarchical experience knowledge. By leveraging experience-aligned training, we effectively regularize stochastic exploration, evolving it into a strategic and experience-driven search process. Extensive evaluations on multiple complex agentic search and mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our approach not only achieves substantial performance gains but also exhibits strong cross-task and cross-algorithm generalization.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models rely on long chain-of-thought to achieve strong performance, but applying such reasoning uniformly incurs high computational cost. Existing efficiency-oriented methods attempt to shorten or mix reasoning strategies, yet often degrade reasoning capability. We identify the root cause as sequence-level coupling between efficiency incentives and correctness optimization, which implicitly penalizes long but correct reasoning trajectories. To address this issue, we propose Adaptive Dual-Process Thinking (ADaPT), a token-level dual-process framework that explicitly decouples efficiency and correctness signals during training. ADaPT introduces a mode-selection token to control fast and slow reasoning, applying efficiency-related rewards exclusively to this token to avoid penalizing correct long reasoning while encouraging efficiency when appropriate. Moreover, ADaPT enables precise and continuous control over the efficiency–performance trade-off at inference time: by adjusting the generation probability of the mode-selection token, a single trained model can smoothly move along the efficiency–performance Pareto frontier. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ADaPT significantly reduces inference cost while maintaining strong reasoning performance across multiple benchmarks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a key approach for improving long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods such as GRPO often break down when task difficulty exceeds the model’s capacity, resulting in sparse rewards and inefficient training. While prior work attempts to address this issue using off-policy data, it frequently introduces distributional mismatch, leading to unstable policy updates.In this work, we identify a fundamental issue underlying these limitations, which we term low training affinity, and propose Affinity, the first quantitative metric for measuring the compatibility between external guidance and a model’s intrinsic policy. Based on this insight, we introduce HINT, an adaptive framework designed to enhance reasoning performance while explicitly preserving high Affinity.HINT consists of two key components. First, instead of providing partial answers, it introduces Meta-Hints, which serve as abstract cognitive scaffolding that guides the model to independently construct solutions. Second, we propose Affinity-Aware Policy Optimization (AAPO), which dynamically adjusts the learning objective based on the Affinity signal to ensure stable training.Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that HINT consistently outperforms strong baselines, while achieving improved training stability and robust generalization to out-of-distribution tasks. Code is available at: https://github.com/ViviqwerAsd/HINT

Abstract:
To address two correlated question in Optimization under Uncertainty (OuU): Expertise Threshold and Selection Conundrum, we propose LLM4OuU, a multi-agent framework that automates both the modeling and solving of six distinct types of uncertainty models and generates mapping pairs to explore the potential relationship between optimization problems and optimal models. Firstly, we decompose the complex modeling process into five sequential steps and design specialized LLM agents combining high-level domain expertise. Secondly, we introduce a hybrid dataset spanning various industries based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to benchmark performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that LLM4OuU achieves superior performance compared to baselines, even reaching up to 99% on specific model types. Finally, we establish a mapping from problem features to optimal models, with correlation analysis revealing that not only data scale but also the specific scenario significantly influence model selection.

Abstract:
Memorization in language models is widely studied but remains difficult to isolate and control. Understanding when and what models memorize is essential for explaining their predictions, yet existing approaches are post-hoc: they can detect memorization in trained models, but cannot disentangle its effects from architecture, data, or optimization. We introduce Memory Dial, a training framework that makes memorization an explicit, controllable variable. Memory Dial interpolates between standard cross-entropy and a temperature-sharpened objective via a single parameter, producing a family of models identical in architecture, data, and optimization, but varying in memorization pressure. Experiments across six architectures and five benchmarks demonstrate that: (1) reliably controls memorization, with seen-example accuracy increasing monotonically while unseen accuracy remains stable; (2) larger models are more responsive to memorization pressure; and (3) frequent sequences are easier to memorize than rare ones. Memory Dial provides a controlled experimental framework for studying how memorization behavior emerges and interacts with generalization in language models.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for enhancing model reasoning. However, existing RL methods like GRPO often rely on unstructured self-sampling to fit scalar rewards, often producing inefficient rollouts that fail to capture transferable problem-solving strategies. To address these limitations, we propose TemplateRL, a structured template-guided RL framework that augments policy optimization with explicit template guidance. Our approach first constructs a problem-solving template library via MCTS on a small seed set, then seamlessly integrates this high-level structured guidance into RL training. By guiding rollout generation to align with proven template structures, TemplateRL significantly improves high-quality trajectory hit rates while reducing ineffective exploration. This structure-guided design steers the policy toward validated strategic patterns, stabilizing training dynamics, and enhancing RL sampling efficiency. Notably, the explicit template library is interpretable, editable, and supports online updates-enabling continuous updates during both training and inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TemplateRL outperforms GRPO by 99% on AIME and 41% on AMC, with superior stability on weak models and remarkable cross-domain generalization, highlighting its potential for broader tasks.

Abstract:
Post-training paradigms for Large Language Models (LLMs), primarily Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL), face a fundamental dilemma: SFT provides stability (low variance) but suffers from high fitting bias, while RL enables exploration (low bias) but grapples with high gradient variance. Existing unified optimization strategies often employ naive loss weighting, overlooking the statistical conflict between these distinct gradient signals. In this paper, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of this bias-variance trade-off and propose DYPO (Dynamic Policy Optimization), a unified framework designed to structurally mitigate this conflict. DYPO integrates three core components: (1) a Group Alignment Loss (GAL) that leverages intrinsic group dynamics to significantly reduce RL gradient variance; (2) a Multi-Teacher Distillation mechanism that corrects SFT fitting bias via diverse reasoning paths; and (3) a Dynamic Exploitation-Exploration Gating mechanism that adaptively arbitrates between stable SFT and exploratory RL based on reward feedback. Theoretical analysis confirms that DYPO linearly reduces fitting bias and minimizes overall variance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DYPO significantly outperforms traditional sequential pipelines, achieving an average improvement of 4.8% on complex reasoning benchmarks and 13.3% on out-of-distribution tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) for code generation have achieved remarkable progress in synthesizing functional code from natural language instructions. However, a critical challenge persists in generating visually accurate and structurally sound front-end code that faithfully renders user-intended layouts and interfaces. Most existing works focus primarily on functional correctness, overlooking the visual fidelity and rendering quality essential for front-end development. To address this gap, we present a comprehensive data construction and training pipeline to enhance front-end code generation capabilities in code LLMs. We use a three-stage training approach: continual pre-training on synthetic data, quality-controlled supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning with checklist-based rewards to improve model performance. Our comprehensive evaluation on front-end code generation benchmarks reveals that even strong base models struggle with visual faithfulness and layout complexity. Our fully-trained model demonstrated substantial improvements over baseline approaches across all domains, achieving competitive performance with frontier models while maintaining generation efficiency, underscoring the critical importance of stage-aligned data curation and vision-grounded optimization in developing reliable front-end code generation systems. Our code and data are open-sourced at https://github.com/leanfeng1/FrontCoder.

Abstract:
The stateless architecture of Large Language Models inherently lacks the mechanism to preserve dynamic context, compelling agents to redundantly reprocess history to maintain long-horizon autonomy. While latent memory offers a solution, current approaches are hindered by architectural segregation, relying on auxiliary encoders that decouple memory from the reasoning backbone. We propose FlashMem , a framework that distills intrinsic memory directly from transient reasoning states via computation reuse. Leveraging the property that internal representations uniquely encode input trajectories, FlashMem identifies the last hidden state as a sufficient statistic for the interaction history. This enables a Shared-KV Consolidator to synthesize memory by attending directly to the backbone’s frozen cache, eliminating redundant re-parameterization. Furthermore, a parameter-free Cognitive Monitor leverages attention entropy to adaptively trigger consolidation only when high epistemic uncertainty is detected. Experiments demonstrate that FlashMem matches the performance of heavy baselines while reducing inference latency by 5 times , effectively bridging the gap between efficiency and persistent cognition.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Vision–language Models (VLMs) suggest their potential for multimodal misinformation detection. However, existing multimodal misinformation detectors often fail to effectively integrate them, relying instead on passive aggregation of multimodal features and social signals. Such correlation-driven paradigms are vulnerable to spurious associations and multimodal noise, and lack explicit verification mechanisms. In this paper, we propose Logic-Guided Adaptive Reasoning (LoGAR), a verification-oriented framework that integrates VLMs into multimodal misinformation detection through explicit rationale-guided reasoning. LoGAR leverages a VLM to generate an explicit verification rationale, which serves as a global semantic anchor to condition the entire reasoning process. Concretely, the rationale functions as an active query to guide multimodal feature fusion and as a conditioning signal to modulate message passing over heterogeneous social graphs, enabling hypothesis-aware evidence aggregation. Furthermore, LoGAR introduces an instance-aware adaptive depth mechanism that dynamically determines the required reasoning depth. Experimental results on multiple multimodal misinformation benchmarks demonstrate that LoGAR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods while significantly reducing computational cost.

Abstract:
Training large language models (LLMs) at 4-bit precision offers substantial efficiency gains but remains challenging due to the limited dynamic range and coarse numerical resolution. Existing 4-bit training pipelines typically rely on max-scaling, which is ill-suited for heavy-tailed LLM tensor distributions and leads to severe under-utilization of the FP4 quantization grid in the low-magnitude region. This effect causes pronounced representation collapse and large rounding errors for the values that dominate LLM computation. In this work, we derive the theoretically optimal scaling for FP4 under heavy-tailed inputs, revealing why max-scaling is intrinsically suboptimal. Guided by this analysis, we propose Half-S , a simple and efficient scaling strategy that uses half-scaling as a hardware-friendly default and falls back to an MSE-based clipping threshold when needed, yielding a close approximation to the theoretical optimum under real LLM statistics. Extensive experiments on large-scale pretraining and downstream fine-tuning show that Half-S consistently narrows the gap to BF16 in both convergence and final model quality, while preserving the efficiency benefits of 4-bit computation. Under native FP4 support, Half-S is estimated to provide up to 1.8 × end-to-end training speedup. These results indicate that Half-S provides a simple and effective correction to max-scaling, substantially improving the stability and accuracy of 4-bit LLM training.

Abstract:
Multi-objective alignment for text-to-image generation is commonly implemented via static linear scalarization, but fixed weights often fail under heterogeneous rewards, leading to optimization imbalance where models overfit high-variance, high-responsiveness objectives (e.g., OCR) while under-optimizing perceptual goals. We identify two mechanistic causes: variance hijacking , where reward dispersion induces implicit reweighting that dominates the normalized training signal, and gradient conflicts , where competing objectives produce opposing update directions and trigger seesaw-like oscillations. We propose APEX ( A daptive P riority-based E fficient X -objective Alignment), which stabilizes heterogeneous rewards with Dual-Stage Adaptive Normalization and dynamically schedules objectives via 𝒫 3 Adaptive Priorities that combine learning potential, conflict penalty, and progress need. On Stable Diffusion 3.5, APEX achieves improved Pareto trade-offs across four heterogeneous objectives, with balanced gains of +1.31 PickScore , +0.35 DeQA , and +0.53 Aesthetics while maintaining competitive OCR accuracy, mitigating the instability of multi-objective alignment.

Abstract:
Combinatorial optimization has long been dominated by manually engineered heuristics, a paradigm requiring substantial expert intuition and implementation overhead. The advent of Large Language Models has disrupted this landscape, enabling the autonomous synthesis and optimization of algorithms. Recent approaches typically iterate on heuristic populations using LLMs as mutators; however, these strategies often suffer from limited exploration, leading to stagnation in local optima. To overcome this, we present the Experience-Driven Reflective Co- Evo lution of P rompt and H euristics ( EvoPH ) for autonomous algorithm design, a novel framework that couples an island migration model with elite selection to maintain population diversity. Uniquely, EvoPH co-evolves both the guiding prompts and the heuristics themselves, using a feedback loop driven by past experience to refine the search process. We demonstrate EvoPH’s efficacy on the Traveling Salesman and Bin Packing Problems. Our results show that EvoPH achieves superior accuracy compared to baselines, marking a significant step forward in LLM-aided algorithm design.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong generation and reasoning abilities, but they still face challenges in long-term memory retention and multi-turn conversational consistency. Existing memory-augmented methods often incorporate full dialog histories without filtering, resulting in information redundancy and inference latency. Inspired by the episodic memory mechanism in human cognition, we abstract conversational context into Episodic Memory Units (EMUs). We then propose a comprehensive framework, Episodic Memory Agent (EMA), along with a filtering decision module called MemDecider. Specifically, EMA organizes and retrieves EMUs to support response generation, while MemDecider filters information to reduce noise and improve overall performance. Experiments on two widely-used benchmarks show that EMA maintains competitive performance, and integrating MemDecider into other methods reduces their token consumption by an average of 11.48% while effectively improving the overall performance. Code is available at https://github.com/Hongyi4221/EMA.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting significantly enhances model reasoning, yet its internal mechanisms remain poorly understood. We analyze CoT’s operational principles by reversely tracing information flow across decoding, projection, and activation phases. Our quantitative analysis suggests that CoT may serve as a decoding space pruner, leveraging answer templates to guide output generation, with higher template adherence strongly correlating with improved performance. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that CoT modulates neuron engagement in a task-dependent manner: reducing neuron activation in open-domain tasks, yet increasing it in closed-domain scenarios. These findings offer a novel mechanistic interpretability framework and critical insights for the NLP community, enabling targeted CoT interventions to design more efficient and robust prompts. We released our code and data at https://github.com/How-Young-X/cot

Abstract:
Extending CoT through RL has been widely used to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. However, due to the sparsity of reward signals, it can also induce undesirable thinking patterns such as overthinking, i.e., generating redundant intermediate reasoning content. In this work, we argue that a major source of such redundancy is inefficient reflection, which often manifests in two problematic patterns: Indiscriminate Reflection, where the model performs broad, low-impact checks throughout reasoning, and Repetitive Reflection, where it repeatedly re-verifies an already established conclusion. To address this, we introduce a graph-based CoT optimization framework. Specifically, we convert each linear CoT into a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with explicit dependency edges, and design a dual pruning strategy: branch-level pruning removes weakly contributing reflection branches, while depth-level pruning eliminates late-stage re-verification. We distill this behavior via a three-stage pipeline: (1) SFT to initialize the policy on pruned concise traces, (2) DPO to prefer correct but less redundant trajectories, and (3) GRPO with length penalty to jointly optimize answer correctness and efficiency. Experiments show that our approach reduces the average reasoning tokens by 42% while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enables large language models (LLMs) to leverage external knowledge, but also exposes valuable RAG databases to leakage attacks. As RAG systems grow more complex and LLMs exhibit stronger instruction-following capabilities, existing studies fall short of systematically assessing RAG leakage risks. We present LeakDojo, a configurable framework for controlled evaluation of RAG leakage. Using LeakDojo, we benchmark six existing attacks across fourteen LLMs, four datasets, and diverse RAG systems. Our study reveals that (1) query generation and adversarial instructions contribute independently to leakage, with overall leakage well approximated by their product; (2) stronger instruction-following capability correlates with higher leakage risk; and (3) improvements in RAG faithfulness can introduce increased leakage risk. These findings provide actionable insights for understanding and mitigating RAG leakage in practice. Our codebase is available at https://github.com/yeasen-z/LeakDojo.

Abstract:
Existing approaches to increasing the effective depth of Transformers predominantly rely on parameter reuse, extending computation through recursive execution.Under this paradigm, the network structure remains static along the training timeline, and additional computational depth is uniformly assigned to entire blocks at the parameter level.This rigidity across training time and parameter space leads to substantial computational redundancy during training.In contrast, we argue that depth allocation during training should not be a static preset, but rather a progressively growing structural process. Our systematic analysis reveals a deep-to-shallow maturation trajectory across layers, where high-entropy attention heads play a crucial role in semantic integration. Motivated by this observation, we introduce the Sparse Growing Transformer (SGT).SGT is a training-time sparse depth allocation framework that progressively extends recurrence from deeper to shallower layers via targeted attention looping on informative heads. This mechanism induces structural sparsity by selectively increasing depth only for a small subset of parameters as training evolves.Extensive experiments across multiple parameter scales demonstrate that SGT consistently outperforms training-time static block-level looping baselines under comparable settings, while reducing the additional training FLOPs overhead from approximately 16–20% to only 1–3% relative to a standard Transformer backbone.

Abstract:
Recommender systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are often plagued by hallucinations of out-of-domain (OOD) items. To address this, we propose RecLM, a unified framework that bridges the gap between retrieval and generation by instantiating three grounding paradigms under a single architecture: embedding-based retrieval, constrained generation over rewritten item titles, and discrete item-tokenizer generation. Using the same backbone LLM and prompts, we systematically compare these three views on public benchmarks. RecLM strictly eradicates OOD recommendations (OOD@10 = 0) across all variants, and the constrained generation variants RecLM-cgen and RecLM-token achieve overall state-of-the-art accuracy compared to both strong ID-based and LLM-based baselines. Our unified view provides a systematic basis for comparing three distinct paradigms to reduce item hallucinations, offering a practical framework to facilitate the application of LLMs to recommendation tasks. Source code is at https://github.com/microsoft/RecAI.

Abstract:
As low-resourced languages are increasingly incorporated into NLP research, there is an emphasis on collecting large-scale datasets. But in prioritizing quantity over quality, we risk 1) building language technologies that perform poorly for these languages and 2) producing harmful content that perpetuates societal biases. In this paper, we investigate the quality of Machine Translation (MT) datasets for three low-resourced languages–Afan Oromo, Amharic, and Tigrinya, with a focus on the gender representation in the datasets. Our findings demonstrate that while training data has a large representation of political and religious domain text, benchmark datasets are focused on news, health, and sports. We also found a large skew towards the male gender–in names of persons, the grammatical gender of verbs, and in stereotypical depictions in the datasets. Further, we found harmful and toxic depictions against women, which were more prominent for the language with the largest amount of data, underscoring that quantity does not guarantee quality. We hope that our work inspires further inquiry into the datasets collected for low-resourced languages and prompts early mitigation of harmful content. WARNING: This paper contains discussion of NSFW content that some may find disturbing.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) have been explored for visual programming, where they generate code to solve visual tasks. However, most prior work focuses on visual programming for productivity; it remains unclear how well current VLMs perform on education-oriented visual programming and what factors limit their performance. To bridge this gap, we introduce TURTLEAI, a benchmark containing 823 tasks curated based on real-world visual programming tasks in the Turtle Graphics domain. Solving these tasks requires models to perceive geometric patterns, reason about spatial relationships, and synthesize Python code that faithfully reproduces geometric patterns. We evaluate 20+ VLMs, including GPT-5, GPT-4o, and Qwen2-VL-72B, and find that they struggle significantly, with most achieving success rates below 30%. To address these limitations, we propose a data generation technique that requires only a small set of seed samples. Fine-tuning Qwen2-VL-72B on the resulting synthetic data yields an improvement of about 20% on real-world tasks. Our failure analysis reveals that GPT-4o struggles with spatial reasoning and precise visual replication, whereas fine-tuning primarily improves the alignment between visual reasoning and code implementation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in role-play scenarios, but their safety implications remain under-characterized. We present an explanatory framework grounded in Bandura’s Moral Disengagement theory and introduce a diagnostic benchmark (MD-Trace) for role-play jailbreaks. In our experiments, role-play improves safety behavior for benign personas while increasing unsafe compliance for malicious ones. We observe a Knowing-but-Doing failure in which models recognize safety risks in their thinking traces yet proceed to comply with harmful requests. Mechanism analysis suggests that Moral Justification is dominant, with Disregard of Consequences appearing as a secondary pattern. We compare multiple attack and defense methods and find that the diagnosis aligns with observed failure modes. Finally, we propose MD-Shield, an introspection-based defense that reduces attack success while maintaining Role Fidelity. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/lavapapa/MoralJustify/ .

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on massive training datasets, often including proprietary data, which raises concerns about unauthorized usage and copyright infringement. Existing dataset inference methods typically require access to log probabilities or other internal signals, but many modern LLMs restrict such access, motivating token-only inference approaches. We propose CatShift, a token-only dataset inference framework based on catastrophic forgetting, where models overwrite prior knowledge when trained on new data. Fine-tuning an LLM on a subset of its training data induces larger output shifts than fine-tuning on unseen data. CatShift compares these shifts against those from a known non-member validation set to infer whether a dataset was included in training. Experiments on both open-source and API-based LLMs show that CatShift remains effective without logit access, enabling practical protection of proprietary datasets.

Abstract:
Text-based web agents offer computational efficiency for autonomous web navigation, yet developing robust agents remains challenging due to the noisy and heterogeneous nature of real-world HTML. Standard Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) approaches fail in two critical dimensions: they lack discrimination capabilities to reject plausible but incorrect elements in densely populated pages, and exhibit limited generalization to unseen website layouts. To address these challenges, we introduce the Triton dataset (590k instances) and a progressive training curriculum. Triton is constructed via Structural-Semantic Hard Negative Mining, which explicitly mines topologically similar distractors, and a Dual-Agent Consensus pipeline that synthesizes diverse cross-domain tasks with strict verification. Building upon this foundation, our progressive curriculum produces three models: Triton-SFT-32B for basic imitation, Triton-ORPO-32B for robust discrimination via Odds Ratio Preference Optimization, and Triton-GRPO-32B for long-horizon consistency through Group Relative Policy Optimization. Empirical evaluation on Mind2Web demonstrates that Triton-GRPO-32B achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source models with 58.7% Step Success Rate, surpassing GPT-4.5 (42.4%) and Claude-4.5 (41.4%) by over 16%, validating that specialized data curriculum outweighs raw parameter scale for web navigation.

Abstract:
Recent advances in AI and wearable devices, such as augmented-reality glasses, have made it possible to augment human memory by retrieving personal experiences in response to natural language queries. However, existing egocentric video datasets fall short in supporting the personalization and long-context reasoning required for episodic memory retrieval. To address these limitations, we introduce EgoMemory, a benchmark derived from Ego4D, enriched with 165,795 user-specific object annotations over 245 videos from 45 participants, yielding 639 distinct, human-curated, and evaluated queries for rich and individualized episodic memory retrieval. Leveraging this resource, we present EgoRetriever, a novel, training-free retrieval framework that combines Multimodal Large Language Models with reflective Chain-of-Thought prompting. Our approach enables interpretive inference of user intent and generates detailed target video descriptions by leveraging contextualized personal memory for video retrieval. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks, including EgoMemory, EgoCVR, and EgoLife, demonstrate that EgoRetriever consistently and substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, highlighting its strong generalizability and practical potential for personalized, long-context egocentric video retrieval.

Abstract:
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their proficiency in understanding and reasoning over multiple images remains largely unexplored. While existing benchmarks have initiated the evaluation of multi-image models, a comprehensive analysis of their core weaknesses and their causes is still lacking. In this work, we introduce MIMIC (Multi-Image Model Insights and Challenges), a new benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the multi-image capabilities of LVLMs. Using MIMIC, we conduct a series of diagnostic experiments that reveal pervasive issues: LVLMs often fail to aggregate information across images and struggle to track or attend to multiple concepts simultaneously. To address these failures, we propose two novel complementary remedies. On the data side, we present a procedural data-generation strategy that composes single-image annotations into rich, targeted multi-image training examples. On the optimization side, we analyze layer-wise attention patterns and derive an attention-masking scheme tailored for multi-image inputs. Experiments substantially improved cross-image aggregation, while also enhancing performance on existing multi-image benchmarks, outperforming prior state of the art across tasks. Data and code will be made available.

Abstract:
In deployed large language models (LLMs), inference energy consumption has grown rapidly and has emerged as a key bottleneck in large-scale deployment, yet most existing inference efficiency methods focus on reducing FLOPs or latency, rather than explicitly modeling or enforcing end-to-end inference energy constraints. We propose EOP-LLM, an energy-oriented dynamic pruning framework that enables LLM inference under explicit per-sequence energy budgets. EOP-LLM combines a device-calibrated energy proxy with lightweight token and feed-forward (FFN) selectors, coordinated through a global dual variable, to dynamically allocate computation while preserving model quality. Extensive experiments on LLaMA 3.2 (1B/3B) and LLaMA 3.1 (8B) demonstrate that EOP-LLM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art dynamic pruning baselines under matched energy budgets, while strictly adhering to per-sequence energy constraints.

Abstract:
Detecting texts generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) could cause grave mistakes due to incorrect decisions, such as undermining student’s academic dignity. LLM text detection thus needs to ensure the interpretability of the decision, which can help users judge how reliably correct its prediction is. When humans verify whether a text is human-written or LLM-generated, they intuitively investigate with which of them it shares more similar spans. However, existing interpretable detectors are not aligned with the human decision-making process and fail to offer evidence that users easily understand. To bridge this gap, we introduce ExaGPT, an interpretable detection approach grounded in the human decision-making process for verifying the origin of a text. ExaGPT identifies a text by checking whether it shares more similar spans with human-written vs. with LLM-generated texts from a datastore. This approach can provide similar span examples that contribute to the decision for each span in the text as evidence. Our human evaluation demonstrates that providing similar span examples contributes more effectively to judging the correctness of the decision than existing interpretable methods. Moreover, extensive experiments in four domains and three generators show that ExaGPT massively outperforms prior interpretable detectors by up to +37.0 points of accuracy at a false positive rate of 1%.

Abstract:
Dense retrieval models are typically fine-tuned with contrastive learning objectives that require binary relevance judgments, even though relevance is inherently graded. We analyze how graded relevance scores and the threshold used to convert them into binary labels affect multilingual dense retrieval. Using a multilingual dataset with LLM-annotated relevance scores, we examine monolingual, multilingual mixture, and cross-lingual retrieval scenarios. Our findings show that the optimal threshold varies systematically across languages and tasks, often reflecting differences in resource level. A well-chosen threshold can improve effectiveness, reduce the amount of fine-tuning data required, and mitigate annotation noise, whereas a poorly chosen one can degrade performance. We argue that graded relevance is a valuable but underutilized signal for dense retrieval, and that threshold calibration should be treated as a principled component of the fine-tuning pipeline.

Abstract:
Large Language Models excel at role-playing but struggle to maintain consistent personalities across extended multi-turn interactions. We propose PersonaForge, combining (1) a three-layer personality architecture grounded in psychological theory and (2) a dual-process generation mechanism inspired by cognitive science. We test two falsifiable claims: Claim 1 (Orthogonality): Psychology-grounded dimensions (Big Five + Defense Mechanisms) provide more orthogonal constraints than natural language descriptions, reducing long-dialogue drift. Claim 2 (Integration Necessity): High-dimensional personality constraints create "production interference" requiring a cognitive workspace (Inner Monologue) to resolve—removing it degrades performance below simpler baselines. Experiments on 88 characters demonstrate: (1) +19.4% personality consistency (PC) with human correlation r=0.82, (2) reduced drift over 50-turn conversations (6.3% vs. 24.8% baseline), and (3) +64.7% defense mechanism manifestation. External validation on RoleBench confirms generalization (73.2% win-rate, drift 8.4% vs. 20.4%). Selective dual-process activation achieves 96% of full-system performance with only 13.4% token overhead. Human evaluation confirms more authentic and psychologically coherent character behaviors. Code and data: https://github.com/fQwQf/PersonaForge.

Abstract:
Recent advances in multimodal recommenders excel at feature fusion but remain opaque and inefficient decision-makers, lacking explicit reasoning and self-awareness of uncertainty. To address this, we introduce ReasonRec, a reasoning-augmented multimodal agent structured around a three-stage explicit reasoning pipeline: Observe, via a pretrained Vision-Language Model (VLM) encoder; Deliberate, by formulating recommendation as chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning tasks and explicitly quantifying prediction uncertainty through an evidence-horizon-aware curriculum; and Act, through dynamic delegation of uncertain or challenging queries to lightweight classical recommendation models. Specifically, we propose a reasoning-aware visual instruction tuning strategy that systematically transforms diverse recommendation tasks into unified CoT prompts, enabling the VLM to explicitly articulate intermediate decision steps. Additionally, our evidence-horizon curriculum progressively enhances the reasoning complexity to better handle cold-start and long-tail user scenarios, significantly boosting model generalization. Furthermore, the uncertainty-guided delegation mechanism empowers the agent to assess its own confidence, strategically allocating computational resources to optimize both recommendation accuracy and inference efficiency. Comprehensive experiments on four standard recommendation tasks (sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, CTR prediction, and explanation generation) across five real-world datasets demonstrate that ReasonRec achieves over 30% relative improvement in key ranking metrics (e.g., HR@5, NDCG@5) compared to state-of-the-art multimodal recommenders. Crucially, ReasonRec substantially reduces inference latency by dynamically delegating up to 35% of queries to efficient sub-models without compromising accuracy. Extensive ablation studies further confirm that each proposed reasoning and planning mechanism individually contributes substantially to ReasonRec’s overall effectiveness. Collectively, our results illustrate a clear pathway towards interpretable, adaptive, and efficient multimodal recommendation through explicit reasoning and agentic design.

Abstract:
Personalized large language models (LLMs) adapt model behavior to individual users to enhance user satisfaction, yet personalization can inadvertently distort factual reasoning. We show that when personalized LLMs face factual queries, there exists a phenomenon where the model generates answers aligned with a user’s prior history rather than the objective truth, resulting in personalization-induced hallucinations that degrade factual reliability and may propagate incorrect beliefs, due to representational entanglement between personalization and factual representations. To address this issue, we propose Factuality-Preserving Personalized Steering (FPPS), a lightweight inference-time approach that mitigates personalization-induced factual distortions while preserving personalized behavior. We further introduce PFQABench, the first benchmark designed to jointly evaluate factual and personalized question answering under personalization. Experiments across multiple LLM backbones and personalization methods show that FPPS substantially improves factual accuracy while maintaining personalized performance.

Abstract:
Understanding and reasoning about entire soft-ware repositories is an essential capability for intelligent software engineering tools. While existing benchmarks such as CoSQA and CodeQA have advanced the field, they predominantly focus on small, self-contained code snippets. These setups fail to capture the complexity of real-world repositories, where effective understanding and reasoning often require navigating multiple files, understanding software architecture, and grounding answers in long-range code dependencies. In this paper, we present SWE-QA, a repository-level code question answering (QA) benchmark designed to facilitate research on automated QA systems in realistic code environments. SWE-QA involves 720 high-quality question-answer pairs spanning diverse categories, including intention understanding, cross-file reasoning, and multi-hop dependency analysis. To construct SWE-QA, we first crawled 77,100 GitHub issues from 12 popular repositories. Based on an analysis of naturally occurring developer questions extracted from these issues, we developed a two-level taxonomy of repository-level questions and constructed a set of seed questions for each category. For each category, we manually curated and validated questions and collected their corresponding answers. We evaluate six advanced LLMs on SWE-QA under various context augmentation strategies. Experimental results highlight the promise of LLMs.

Abstract:
Training large language models for domain adaptation poses a significant challenge in balancing the acquisition of domain knowledge with the retention of general abilities, often leading to catastrophic forgetting. While curriculum learning offers a promising direction, conventional methods typically rely on a single dimension of knowledge or task, which is insufficient to navigate the trade-off between knowledge breadth and task depth. In this paper, we propose a two-dimensional curriculum learning framework that coordinates model training along two orthogonal axes: the knowledge dimension and the task dimension. We first reconstruct the dataset by clustering instances according to their semantic similarity to general-domain data, and subsequently annotate them with a task hierarchy. Then, we design an integrated curriculum that develops from general to domain-specific knowledge clusters, and within each cluster, from lower- to higher-order cognitive tasks. Compared with the second-best method, our method improves accuracy on medical evaluations by 2.49% and on financial evaluations by 1.2%. Ablation and cross-domain experiments further demonstrate our method as a scalable and effective framework for structured domain adaptation in large language model fine-tuning. We have released the code in an anonymous repository at https://github.com/Melo-1017/Balancing-Knowledge-Breadth-and-Task-Depth.

Abstract:
Visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (VRAG) enhances Vision-Language Models (VLMs) by incorporating external visual documents to address a given query. Existing VRAG frameworks usually depend on rigid, pre-defined external tools to extend the perceptual capabilities of VLMs, typically by explicitly separating visual perception from subsequent reasoning processes. However, this decoupled design can lead to unnecessary loss of visual information, particularly when image-based operations such as cropping are applied. In this paper, we propose Lang2Act, which enables fine-grained visual perception and reasoning through self-emergent linguistic toolchains. Rather than invoking fixed external engines, Lang2Act collects self-emergent actions as linguistic tools and leverages them to enhance the visual perception capabilities of VLMs. To support this mechanism, we design a two-stage Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based training framework. Specifically, the first stage optimizes VLMs to self-explore high-quality actions for constructing a reusable linguistic toolbox, and the second stage further optimizes VLMs to exploit these linguistic tools for downstream reasoning effectively. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of Lang2Act in substantially enhancing the visual perception capabilities of VLMs, achieving performance improvements of over 4%. All code and data are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/Lang2Act.

Abstract:
Speculative Decoding (SD) accelerates autoregressive large language model (LLM) inference by decoupling generation and verification. While recent methods improve draft quality by tightly coupling the drafter with the target model, the verification mechanism itself remains largely unchanged, relying on strict token-level rejection sampling. In practice, modern LLMs frequently operate in low-margin regimes where the target model exhibits weak preference among top candidates. In such cases, rejecting plausible runner-up tokens yields negligible information gain while incurring substantial rollback cost, leading to a fundamental inefficiency in verification.We propose Margin-Aware Speculative Verification, a training-free and domain-agnostic verification strategy that adapts to the target model’s local decisiveness. Our method conditions verification on decision stability measured directly from the target logits and relaxes rejection only when strict verification provides minimal benefit. Importantly, the approach modifies only the verification rule and is fully compatible with existing target-coupled speculative decoding frameworks. Extensive experiments across model scales ranging from 8B to 235B demonstrate that our method delivers consistent and significant inference speedups over state-of-the-art baselines while preserving generation quality across diverse benchmarks. The code is available at https://github.com/5SSjw/MARS.

Abstract:
Imbalanced data are commonly present in real-world applications. While data synthesis can effectively mitigate data scarcity for rare classes, and LLMs have revolutionized text generation, the application of LLMs to the synthesis of relational/structured tabular data remains underexplored. Moreover, existing approaches lack an effective feedback mechanism to guide LLMs in continuously optimizing the quality of the generated data throughout the synthesis process. In this work, we propose RDDG, R elational D ata generator with D ynamic G uidance, which is a unified in-context learning framework that employs progressive chain-of-thought (CoT) steps to generate tabular data for enhancing downstream imbalanced classification performance. RDDG first uses core set selection to identify representative samples from the original data, then utilizes in-context learning to discover the inherent patterns and correlations among attributes within the core set, and subsequently generates tabular data while preserving the aforementioned constraints. More importantly, it incorporates a self-reinforcing feedback mechanism that provides automatic assessments of the quality of the generated data, enabling continuous quality optimization throughout the generation process. Experimental results on multiple real and synthetic datasets demonstrate that RDDG outperforms existing approaches in both data fidelity and downstream imbalanced classification performance.

Abstract:
Long-form text generation remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs), particularly in maintaining coherence, ensuring logical consistency, and preserving text quality as sequence length increases. To address these limitations, we propose SuperWriter -Agent, an agent-based framework designed to enhance the quality and consistency of long-form text generation. SuperWriter -Agent introduces explicit structured thinking-through planning and refinement stages—into the generation pipeline, guiding the model to follow a more deliberate and cognitively grounded process akin to that of a professional writer. Based on this framework, we construct a supervised fine-tuning dataset to train a 7B SuperWriter -LM. We further develop a hierarchical Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) procedure that uses Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to propagate final quality assessments and optimize each generation step accordingly. Empirical results across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that SuperWriter -LM achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing even larger-scale baseline models in both automatic evaluation and human evaluation. Furthermore, comprehensive ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of hierarchical DPO and underscore the value of incorporating structured thinking steps to improve the quality of long-form text generation.

Abstract:
The integration of large language models (LLMs) into a wide range of applications has highlighted the critical role of well-crafted system prompts, which require extensive testing and domain expertise. These prompts enhance task performance but may also encode sensitive information and filtering criteria, posing security risks if exposed. Recent research shows that system prompts are vulnerable to extraction attacks, while existing defenses are either easily bypassed or require constant updates to address new threats. In this work, we introduce ProxyPrompt, a novel defense mechanism that prevents prompt leakage by replacing the original prompt with a proxy. This proxy maintains the original task’s utility while obfuscating the extracted prompt, ensuring attackers cannot reproduce the task or access sensitive information. Comprehensive evaluations on 264 LLM and system prompt pairs show that ProxyPrompt protects 94.70% of prompts from extraction attacks, outperforming the next-best defense, which only achieves 42.80%.

Abstract:
Research on ancient Chinese language is of great significance for tracing Chinese history and civilization. In the field of large language models, studies on the pre-Qin excavated documents such as Oracle Bone Inscriptions, Bronze Inscriptions, and Bamboo Book of Chu remain insufficient. This is because these ancient characters have a low level of digitization, training corpora are extremely scarce, and they typically contain complex and rich semantic information. Therefore, we propose an ancient character semantic-aware embedding for large language models. This embedding integrates both the glyph and lexicality of ancient characters and maps them to the modern Chinese semantic space. We also design a two-stage method for lightweight and parameter-efficient training of the embedding. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on excavated documents from the pre-Qin period, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Prompt underspecification is a common challenge when interacting with LLMs. In this paper, we present an in-depth analysis of this problem, showing that while LLMs can often infer unspecified requirements by default (41.1%), such behavior is fragile: Under-specified prompts are 2x as likely to regress across model or prompt changes, sometimes with accuracy drops exceeding 20%. This instability makes it difficult to reliably build LLM applications. Moreover, simply specifying all requirements does not consistently help, as models have limited instruction-following ability and requirements can conflict. Standard prompt optimizers likewise provide little benefit. To address these issues, we propose requirements-aware prompt optimization mechanisms that improve performance by 4.8% on average over baselines. We further advocate for a systematic process of proactive requirements discovery, evaluation, and monitoring to better manage prompt underspecification in practice.

Abstract:
Query-focused table summarization requires generating natural language summaries of tabular data conditioned on a user query, enabling users to access insights beyond fact retrieval. Existing approaches face key limitations: table-to-text models require costly fine-tuning and struggle with complex reasoning, prompt-based LLM methods suffer from token-limit and efficiency issues while exposing sensitive data, and prior agentic pipelines often rely on decomposition, planning, or manual templates that lack robustness and scalability. To mitigate these issues, we introduce an agentic workflow, FACTS, a Fast, Accurate, and Privacy-Compliant Table Summarization approach via Offline Template Generation. FACTS produces offline templates, consisting of SQL queries and Jinja2 templates, which can be rendered into natural language summaries and are reusable across multiple tables sharing the same schema. It enables fast summarization through reusable offline templates, accurate outputs with executable SQL queries, and privacy compliance by sending only table schemas to LLMs. Evaluations on widely-used benchmarks show that FACTS consistently outperforms baseline methods, establishing it as a practical solution for real-world query-focused table summarization. Our code is available at https://github.com/BorealisAI/FACTS.

Abstract:
The slow thinking paradigm has been widely validated to enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), but it introduces notable reasoning inefficiencies: models often overthink simple tasks while prematurely shifting their reasoning paths when addressing complex problems. To address this, we propose AdapThink, a simple yet efficient framework for adaptive reasoning preference control. Unlike methods imposing uniform length constraints, AdapThink dynamically adjusts reflection preferences based on group-level distributional statistics of reasoning length and reflection intensity. We further introduce a dispersion-based diversity sampling mechanism that maximizes the geometric spread of reasoning patterns, accelerating learning through exposure to diverse problem-solving strategies. Across mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks, AdapThink reduces average response length by 17.1%-21.4% while improving performance by 6.12-6.59 points under 32K token budgets, demonstrating superior efficiency and robustness against reward hacking compared to strong baselines.

Abstract:
Current safety evaluations of large language models (LLMs) create a dangerous illusion of universal protection by aggregating harms under generic categories such as "Identity Hate", obscuring vulnerabilities toward specific populations. In this work, we expose the Selective Safety Trap: a systemic failure mode where models robustly defend specific populations while leaving underrepresented communities highly vulnerable to identical adversarial attacks. To systematically audit this phenomenon, we introduce MiJaBench, a bilingual (English–Portuguese) adversarial benchmark comprising 43,961 controlled jailbreaking prompts across 16 minority groups. By evaluating 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on MiJaBench, we curate 615,454 prompt-response pairs that compose MiJaBench-Align, revealing that safety alignment is not a uniform semantic capability but a demographic hierarchy, with defense rates fluctuating by up to 42% within the same model solely based on the target group. This disparity persists across architectures and languages and is amplified by scaling, indicating that current alignment methods learn group-specific safeguards rather than a generalized notion of harm. Through targeted direct preference optimization (DPO) on a 1B-parameter baseline, we achieve strong zero-shot safety generalizations to entirely unseen demographics and complex attack strategies. We release all datasets and scripts to provide the community with a concrete pathway toward equitable, transferable safety alignment.

Abstract:
Where someone looks is a nonverbal communication cue that children and adults readily use.How well can Vision-Language Models (VLMs) infer gaze targets? To construct evaluation stimuli, we captured 1,360 real-world photos of scenes in which a person gazes at one of several objects on a table. Importantly, we also controlled the gazer’s head orientation: sometimes it was directed toward the gaze target, sometimes toward a distractor object, and sometimes left unconstrained. We found a substantial performance gap between VLMs and humans, ruled out alternative explanations such as resolution and object-naming skills, and identified the main reason for the gap as VLMs inferring gaze direction using head orientation rather than eye appearance.Such a bias is likely due to data rather than architecture, as suggested by a proof-of-concept experiment finetuning a transformer-based vision model.Future work should investigate whether these findings hold broadly across various deep learning methods trained on existing data, and whether better data mitigates this problem for all architectures.Pinpointing the reason sets the stage for technologies that can interpret gaze targets to have more efficient interactions with humans.

Abstract:
Repository-level code completion benefits from retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). However, controlling cross-file evidence is difficult because chunk utility is often interaction-dependent: some snippets help only when paired with complementary context, while others harm decoding when they conflict. We propose RepoShapley, a coalition-aware context filtering framework supervised by Shapley-style marginal contributions. Our offline labeling module, ChunkShapley, estimates signed per-chunk effects via teacher-forced probing, feeds them into a lightweight surrogate game that captures saturation and interference, computes exact Shapley values for small retrieval sets, and selects a decoding-optimal coalition through bounded post-verification with the frozen generator. The verified < KEEP > / < DROP > decisions and retrieval triggers are then distilled into a single model via discrete control tokens. Experiments across benchmarks and backbones show that RepoShapley improves completion quality while reducing harmful context and unnecessary retrieval.

Abstract:
Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems retrieve evidence at coarse granularities (entire images or scenes), creating a mismatch with fine-grained user queries and making failures unverifiable. We introduce GranuVistaVQA, a multimodal benchmark featuring real-world landmarks with element-level annotations across multiple viewpoints, capturing the partial observation challenge where individual images contain only subsets of entities. We further propose GranuRAG, a multi-granularity framework that treats visual elements as first-class retrieval units through three stages: element-level detection and classification, multi-granularity cross-modal alignment for evidence retrieval, and attribution-constrained generation. By grounding retrieval at the element level rather than relying on implicit attention, our approach enables transparent error diagnosis. Experiments demonstrate that GranuRAG achieves up to 29.2% improvement over six strong baselines for this task.

Abstract:
Video Multimodal Large Language Models (VideoMLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in both Video-to-Text and Text-to-Video tasks. However, they often suffer from hallucinations, generating content that contradicts the visual input. Existing evaluation methods are limited to one task (V2T) and also fail to assess hallucinations in open-ended, free-form responses. To address this gap, we propose FIFA, a unified F a I th F ulness ev A luation framework that extracts comprehensive descriptive facts, models their semantic dependencies via a Spatio-Temporal Semantic Dependency Graph, and verifies them using VideoQA models. We further introduce , a tool-based correction framework that revises hallucinated content. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FIFA aligns more closely with human judgment than existing evaluation methods, and that effectively improves factual consistency in both text and video generation.

Abstract:
LLMs show promise in code generation, yet their effectiveness for IT automation tasks, particularly for tools like Ansible, remains understudied. Existing benchmarks rely primarily on synthetic tasks that fail to capture the needs of practitioners who use IT automation tools. We present ExITBench (Execution-based IT Automation Benchmark), a benchmark of 126 diverse tasks (e.g., configuring servers and managing files) in which each task captures state reconciliation - a core property of IT automation tools. ExITBench evaluates LLMs’ ability to generate functional Ansible automation scripts via dynamic execution in controlled environments. We evaluate 14 open-source and 3 proprietary LLMs and find that GPT-4.1-Mini achieves the best pass@10 rate of 23.9%, while Claude-3.5-Sonnet achieves the best pass@1 performance. To explain the low performance, we analyze 1,517 execution failures across the evaluated LLMs and identify two prevalent semantic error categories: failures in state-reconciliation reasoning (42.117% combined from variable (12.287%), host (10.363%), path (10.511%), and template (8.956%) issues) and deficiencies in module-specific execution knowledge (26.203% combined from attribute & parameter (17.617%) and module (8.586%) errors). Our findings reveal key limitations in LLMs’ ability to address state reconciliation and apply specialized module knowledge, indicating that reliable IT automation with LLM-based agents need major advances in state reasoning and domain-specific execution.

Abstract:
Dialectal Arabic datasets embody a range of domain, dialect, and quality. To better understand the landscape of these datasets, we perform a computational analysis of the ‘dialectness’ and a set of measures of audio quality. This analysis of the training splits of dialectal Arabic datasets, provides a valuable complement to existing literature surveys of dialectal Arabic.To further address inconsistencies between datasets, we also introduce Arab Voices, a standardized framework for supporting Automatic Speech Recognition in dialectal Arabic. This framework provide access to 31 datasets covering 14 dialects, to better address the limited data availability encountered in dialectal Arabic speech processing. Our benchmark further provides a current evaluation of SOTA tools as well as modern multimodal LLMs at dialectal Arabic ASR.

Abstract:
Multimodal GUI agents generally operate on raw visual and textual observations, which creates a fundamental scalability challenge. While current state-of-the-art frameworks predominantly rely on inference-intensive test-time scaling or the accumulation of unbounded raw logs to maintain task coherence, we attribute the underlying bottleneck to insufficient state abstraction.To address this, we propose HiSA, a hierarchical state abstraction approach that actively restructures knowledge rather than passively retaining historical information by organizing raw histories into a three-level hierarchy of abstracted steps, refined contexts, and induced patterns.By synthesizing high-dimensional observations into compact semantic states, HiSA decouples reasoning efficacy from context length, enabling precise and scalable decision-making as interaction histories grow.When evaluating using Spider2-V, our approach establishes a new state-of-the-art, achieving a 40.58% success rate while reducing token consumption by 69.85% and monetary costs by 55.10% compared to the best-performing baseline.

Abstract:
The success of vision-language models is primarily attributed to effective cross-modal alignment between vision and language. However, modality gaps persist even in well-aligned models and may be necessary for human perception, as evidenced by modality-specific phenomena such as visual texture and linguistic tone. These observations motivate us to computationally measure and leverage modality gaps to explore their utility in downstream applications. In this paper, we introduce the M odality D ominance S core ( MDS ), which attributes multimodal features to specific modalities by categorizing them as vision-dominant, language-dominant, or cross-modal. We then propose automatic interpretability metrics to evaluate these modality-specific features in a scalable manner. Finally, we demonstrate how the identified modality-specific features enable training-free probing and editing methods for understanding model perception across genders, generating adversarial examples, and controlling text-to-image generation. Combined with task-agnostic interpretability tools, our work provides a systematic framework for analyzing and efficiently controlling multimodal models.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) face information overload when handling long contexts, particularly in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) where extensive supporting documents introduce redundant content that interferes with reasoning. Context engineering has emerged to address these challenges, yet existing methods rely on lexical or token-level features that fragment semantic units and fail to capture conceptually essential content. We propose an unsupervised context compression framework leveraging Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) to preserve semantically essential information while filtering irrelevant text. By quantifying node-level entropy within AMR graphs, our method estimates the conceptual importance of each node, enabling retention of core semantics. Specifically, we construct AMR graphs from retrieved contexts, compute the conceptual entropy of each node, and identify statistically significant concepts to form a condensed, semantically focused context. Experiments on the PopQA and EntityQuestions datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms vanilla RAG and existing baselines, achieving superior accuracy while substantially reducing context length. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work introducing AMR-based conceptual entropy for context compression, demonstrating the potential of structured linguistic representations in context engineering.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an essential paradigm that enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods typically rely on static policy optimization schemes that misalign with the model’s evolving reasoning capabilities. To address this issue, we propose Adaptive Power-Mean Policy Optimization (APMPO), which comprises two main innovations: Power-Mean Policy Optimization (PMPO) and Feedback-Adaptive Clipping (FAC). Specifically, PMPO introduces a generalized power-mean objective. This enables the model to adaptively transition from the signal-amplifying behavior of the arithmetic mean to the consistency-enforcing behavior of the geometric mean. FAC adaptively adjusts clipping bounds based on real-time reward statistics to overcome the limitations of static mechanisms. Capitalizing on these innovations, APMPO improves learning dynamics and reasoning performance. Extensive experiments on nine datasets across three reasoning tasks showcase the superiority of APMPO over state-of-the-art RLVR-based baselines. For instance, APMPO boosts the average Pass@1 score on mathematical reasoning benchmarks by 3.0 points compared to GRPO when using Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.

Abstract:
Causal and intervention-based question answering is fundamental to advancing large language models (LLMs) toward reasoning beyond surface-level correlations and understanding underlying causal mechanisms. However, existing LLM-based methods often rely on implicit language-level reasoning, resulting in opaque causal assumptions, unverifiable reasoning paths, and fragile predictions under complex interventions, particularly in context-free settings. In this paper, we propose an explicit and auditable causal reasoning framework for context-free intervention-based question answering. Our method formulates causal inference as structured reasoning over an explicit causal graph through four modular stages, rather than implicit end-to-end prediction. A key innovation is a target-aware causal graph construction strategy that treats the target variable as a core constraint during graph expansion, effectively suppressing irrelevant variables, spurious causal relations, and reasoning noise. We further introduce a path-level causal evidence aggregation mechanism that combines multiple causal paths while modeling both reinforcing and counteracting effects, enabling robust decision-making beyond single-chain reasoning. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms existing LLM-based methods while providing interpretable and auditable causal reasoning traces.

Abstract:
Code-switching is a pervasive linguistic phenomenon in global communication, yet modern information retrieval systems remain predominantly designed for, and evaluated within, monolingual contexts. To bridge this critical disconnect, we present a holistic study dedicated to code-switching IR. We introduce CSR-L (Code-Switching Retrieval benchmark-Lite), constructing a dataset via human annotation to capture the authentic naturalness of mixed-language queries. Our evaluation across statistical, dense, and late-interaction paradigms reveals that code-switching acts as a fundamental performance bottleneck, degrading the effectiveness of even robust multilingual models. We demonstrate that this failure stems from substantial divergence in the embedding space between pure and code-switched text. Scaling this investigation, we propose CS-MTEB, a comprehensive benchmark covering 11 diverse tasks, where we observe performance declines of up to 27%. Finally, we show that standard multilingual techniques like vocabulary expansion are insufficient to resolve these deficits completely. These findings underscore the fragility of current systems and establish code-switching as a crucial frontier for future IR optimization.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities yet continue to suffer from hallucination, where generated text contradicts visual content. In this paper, we introduce Dual-Anchor Introspective Decoding (DaID), a novel contrastive decoding framework that dynamically calibrates each token generation by mining the model’s internal perceptual discrepancies. Specifically, DaID identifies a Spotlight layer to amplify visual factual signals and a Shadow layer to suppress textual inertia. By leveraging visual attention distributions to guide this dual-anchor selection process, our method ensures precise, token-specific adaptation. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks and MLLMs demonstrate that DaID significantly mitigates hallucination while enhancing general reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a widely adopted paradigm for grounding Large Language Models (LLMs) in external knowledge. Recent agentic RAG systems introduce multi-turn reasoning, but they often lack the capacity to evaluate the utility of retrieved information, leading to brittle reasoning and suboptimal decision-making. We propose Reflective RAG, an agentic framework that incorporates self-evaluation to dynamically optimize retrieval and generation strategy. At its core, Reflective RAG employs a reflection tagging mechanism that allows the model to critique the relevance of retrieved content, thereby explicitly guiding its subsequent policy. To ensure robust learning, we introduce a two-stage training procedure that partially decouples evaluation semantics from strategy optimization. First, during supervised fine-tuning (SFT), the model learns to generate accurate reflection signals by self-correcting labels based on internal uncertainty. Second, a reinforcement learning (RL) stage optimizes the agent’s strategy using these reflections, stabilized by dynamic KL regularization. Evaluations across five knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks demonstrate that Reflective RAG consistently outperforms strong agentic baselines. Further analysis demonstrates its improved training stability and stronger generalization to complex multi-hop reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with computational efficiency and error propagation in multi-step reasoning tasks. While recent advancements on prompting and post-training have enabled LLMs to perform step-wise reasoning, they still tend to explore unproductive solution paths without effective backtracking or strategy adjustment. In this paper, we propose Meta-Reasoner, a new framework that empowers LLMs to “think about how to think”. It optimizes the inference process by dynamically adapting reasoning strategies in real-time. Our approach employs contextual multi-armed bandits (CMABs) to learn an adaptive policy. It learns to evaluate the current state of LLM’s reasoning and determine optimal strategy that is most likely to lead to a successful outcome during inference, like whether to backtrack, switch to a new approach, or restart the problem-solving process. This meta-guidance helps avoid unproductive paths exploration during inference and hence improves computational efficiency. We evaluate Meta-Reasoner on math problems (e.g., Game-of-24, TheoremQA) and scientific tasks (e.g., SciBench). Results show that our method outperform previous SOTA methods by 9-12% in accuracy, while reducing inference time by 28-35% under the same compute budget. Additional experiments on creative writing demonstrate the generalizability of our approach to diverse reasoning-intensive tasks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has advanced LLM reasoning, but remains constrained by inefficient exploration under limited rollout budgets, leading to low sampling success and unstable training in complex tasks. We find that many exploration failures arise not from problem difficulty, but from a small number of prompt tokens that introduce interference. Building on this insight, we propose the Less Noise Sampling Framework (LENS), which first purifies prompts by identifying and removing interference tokens. then transfers successful rollouts from the purified setting to supervise policy optimization on the original noisy prompts, enabling the model to learn to ignore interference in the real-world, noisy prompting settings. Experimental results show that LENS significantly outperforms GRPO, delivering higher performance and faster convergence, with a 3.88% average gain and over 1.6 × speedup. Our work highlights the critical role of pruning interference tokens in improving rollout efficiency, offering a new perspective for RLVR research.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve from static dialogue interfaces to autonomous general agents, effective memory is paramount to ensuring long-term consistency. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on casual conversation or task-oriented dialogue, failing to capture “long-term project-oriented” interactions where agents must track evolving goals. To bridge this gap, we introduce RealMem, the first benchmark grounded in realistic project scenarios. RealMem comprises over 2,000 cross-session dialogues across eleven scenarios, utilizing natural user queries for evaluation. We propose a synthesis pipeline that integrates Project Foundation Construction, Multi-Agent Dialogue Generation, and Memory and Schedule Management to simulate the dynamic evolution of memory. Experiments reveal that current memory systems face significant challenges in managing the long-term project states and dynamic context dependencies inherent in real-world projects. Our code and datasets are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/realmem-A1E4.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, they remain susceptible to backdoor attacks, where adversaries embed hidden triggers in the input to induce malicious, attacker-specified behaviors. While existing inference-time defenses aim to mitigate such threats by detecting and filtering poisoned inputs, they often lack explicit control over the false acceptance rate (FAR)—a critical requirement in safety-sensitive settings where even rare failures can lead to catastrophic consequences. To address this challenge, we propose SAFER , a novel inference-time defense framework that provides explicit and provable control over FAR without requiring prior knowledge of backdoor samples. SAFER leverages distributional information from available data to estimate the likelihood that an input is clean and selects inputs accordingly. From a theoretical perspective, we demonstrate that SAFER asymptotically guarantees control of the true FAR. Empirical evaluations on three benchmark datasets across diverse backdoor attack scenarios show that SAFER consistently achieves reliable FAR control while maintaining high detection power, significantly outperforming existing inference-time defenses.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Generative Reward Models (GRMs) have demonstrated that scaling the length of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning considerably enhances the reliability of evaluation. However, current works predominantly rely on unstructured length scaling, ignoring the divergent efficacy of different reasoning mechanisms: Breadth-CoT (multi-dimensional principle coverage) and Depth-CoT (substantive judgment soundness). To address this, we introduce Mix-GRM, a framework that reconfigures raw rationales into structured Breadth-CoT and Depth-CoT through a modular synthesis pipeline, subsequently employing Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to internalize and optimize these mechanisms. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that Mix-GRM establishes a new state-of-the-art across five benchmarks, surpassing leading open-source RMs by an average of 8.2%. Our results reveal a clear divergence in reasoning: Breadth-CoT benefits subjective preference tasks, whereas Depth-CoT excels in objective correctness tasks. Consequently, misaligning the reasoning mechanism with the task directly degrades performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that RLVR acts as a switching amplifier, inducing an emergent polarization where the model spontaneously allocates its reasoning style to match task demands.

Abstract:
The advent of autonomous agents is transforming interactions with Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) by employing natural language as a powerful intermediary. Despite the predominance of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) methods in current GUI agents for achieving spatial localization, these methods face substantial challenges due to their limited capacity to accurately perceive positional data. Existing strategies, such as reinforcement learning, often fail to assess positional accuracy effectively, thereby restricting their utility. In response, we introduce Location Preference Optimization (LPO), a novel approach that leverages locational data to optimize interaction preferences. LPO uses information entropy to predict interaction positions by focusing on zones rich in information. Besides, we further introduce a dynamic location reward function based on physical distance, reflecting the varying importance of interaction positions. Supported by Group Relative Preference Optimization (GRPO), LPO facilitates an extensive exploration of GUI environments and significantly enhances interaction precision. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate LPO’s superior performance, achieving SOTA results across both offline benchmarks and real-world online evaluations.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed in real-world applications, yet their safety alignment often fails to generalize beyond the specific linguistic formats seen during training. Prior work has shown that mismatched generalization can lead to alignment failures, but these studies typically rely on fixed or narrow transformation schemes. In this work, we probe safety alignment generalization using language game jailbreaks, a class of linguistically structured transformations that alter surface form while preserving fluency and semantic recoverability. We further introduce custom language games, which parameterize and vary transformation rules, enabling controlled exploration of alignment behavior across closely related linguistic variants. To scale this analysis, we propose AutoLanJail, an automated framework for discovering and refining language game-based jailbreaks. Experiments across open-source and closed-source LLMs show that safety fine-tuning is highly format-specific: defenses trained on one linguistic form fail to generalize to even minimal variations. These findings reveal a structural limitation of current fine-tuning-based alignment methods and highlight the need for safety evaluations that account for systematic linguistic variation.

Abstract:
Large vision–language models (LVLMs) excel at multimodal reasoning but still suffer from object-existence hallucinations when multi-step deliberation decouples from visual evidence. Think-with-Images (TwI) attempts to counter this by generating auxiliary observations (e.g., zoomed crops or highlighted views), yet it is not reliably beneficial. We identify two coupled failure modes: (1) a granularity–context trade-off of common operators, where zoom-in improves local detail but breaks global relations, while highlighting preserves topology but lacks fine evidence; and (2) an over-trust issue in tool-guided region proposals, where mislocalized evidence can dominate reasoning and even underperform standard prompting. We propose Active-Look, a training-free, plug-and-play TwI framework that allocates visual computation by uncertainty. Active-Look runs two heterogeneous grounding experts in parallel and uses their disagreement as a proxy for uncertainty, spending the budget only to verify disputed regions. It further mitigates the operator trade-off with conflict-aware hybrid rendering: highlighting retains global context, while selective zoom-in performs local verification. Experiments on hallucination-focused and general benchmarks (POPE, MME, and CHAIR) across multiple LVLM backbones show consistent gains.

Abstract:
Recent advances such as Chain-of-Thought prompting have significantly improved large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot medical reasoning. However, prompting-based methods often remain shallow and unstable, while fine-tuned medical LLMs suffer from poor generalization under distribution shifts and limited adaptability to unseen clinical scenarios. To address these limitations, we present TAGS, a test-time framework that combines a broadly capable generalist with a domain-specific specialist to offer complementary perspectives without any model fine-tuning or parameter updates. To support this generalist–specialist reasoning process, we introduce two auxiliary modules: a hierarchical retrieval mechanism that provides multi-scale exemplars by selecting examples based on both semantic and rationale-level similarity, and a reliability scorer that evaluates reasoning consistency to guide final answer aggregation. TAGS achieves strong performance across nine MedQA benchmarks, boosting GPT-4o accuracy by 13.8%, DeepSeek-R1 by 16.8%, and improving a vanilla 7B model from 14.1% to 23.9%. These results surpass several fine-tuned medical LLMs, without any parameter updates.

Abstract:
Daily scenarios are characterized by visual richness, requiring Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to filter noise and identify decisive visual clues for accurate reasoning. Yet, current benchmarks predominantly aim at evaluating MLLMs’ pre-existing knowledge or perceptual understanding, often neglecting the critical capability of reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce DailyClue, a benchmark designed for visual clue-driven reasoning in daily scenarios. Our construction is guided by two core principles: (1) strict grounding in authentic daily activities, and (2) challenging query design that necessitates more than surface-level perception. Instead of simple recognition, our questions compel MLLMs to actively explore suitable visual clues and leverage them for subsequent reasoning. To this end, we curate a comprehensive dataset spanning four major daily domains and 16 distinct subtasks. Comprehensive evaluation across MLLMs and agentic models underscores the formidable challenge posed by our benchmark. Our analysis reveals several critical insights, emphasizing that the accurate identification of visual clues is essential for robust reasoning.

Abstract:
Designing proteins that satisfy natural language functional requirements is a central goal in protein engineering. A straightforward baseline is to fine-tune generic instruction-tuned LLMs as direct text-to-sequence generators, but this is data- and compute-hungry. With limited supervision, LLMs can produce coherent plans in text yet fail to reliably realize them as sequences. This plan–execute gap motivates ProtoCycle, an agentic framework for protein design that uses LLMs primarily to drive a multi-round, feedback-driven decision cycle. ProtoCycle couples an LLM planner with a lightweight tool environment designed to emulate the iterative workflow of human protein engineers and uses LLM-driven reflection on tool feedback to revise plans. Trained with supervised trajectories and online reinforcement learning, ProtoCycle achieves strong language alignment while maintaining competitive foldability, and ablations show that reflection substantially improves sequence quality.

Abstract:
Current benchmarks are inadequate for evaluating progress in reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs). Despite recent benchmark gains reported for RL, we find that training on these benchmarks’ training sets achieves nearly the same performance as training directly on the test sets, suggesting that the benchmarks cannot reliably separate further progress. To study this phenomenon, we introduce a diagnostic suite and the Oracle Performance Gap (OPG) metric that quantifies the performance difference between training on the train split versus the test split of a benchmark. We further analyze this phenomenon with stress tests and find that, despite strong benchmark scores, existing RL methods struggle to generalize across distribution shifts, varying levels of difficulty, and counterfactual scenarios: shortcomings that current benchmarks fail to reveal. We conclude that current benchmarks are insufficient for evaluating generalization and propose three core principles for designing more faithful benchmarks: sufficient difficulty, balanced evaluation, and distributional robustness.

Abstract:
Lifelong knowledge editing (LKE) aims to incrementally correct factual inaccuracies in large language models (LLMs), but sequential edits can lead to substantial degradation of capabilities. Existing approaches primarily rely on static parameter regularization, which restricts knowledge integration and fails to prevent cumulative capability degradation. We argue that an important source of this degradation lies in the temporal mismatch between locally editable factual knowledge and procedural knowledge, which is gradually acquired, guides task execution, and cannot be reliably updated by rapid edits. To this end, we formulate LKE as a dual-timescale process, explicitly decoupling fast-updating factual knowledge from slow-evolving procedural knowledge. Based on this formulation, we propose CaPEdit, a framework that preserves model capabilities under LKE. It first synthesizes procedural knowledge across successive edits, and subsequently performs parameter updates guided jointly by factual supervision and the synthesized procedural signal. To ensure stability under long edit sequences, CaPEdit is trained via a hybrid optimization scheme, combining step-wise updates for rapid factual correction with trajectory-level optimization to facilitate gradual procedural adaptation. Experiments demonstrate that CaPEdit improves capability preservation across all fundamental capabilities by 49.78%, achieves superior editing performance, and requires only 18.07% of the editing time of most existing methods.

Abstract:
Large language models with billions of parameters are often over-provisioned: many layers contribute little unique information yet dominate the memory and energy footprint during inference. We present LieQ (Layer-wise information effectiveness Quantization), a hardware-native, metric-driven post-training quantization framework that addresses the critical challenge of maintaining accuracy in sub-8B models, model parameters less than 8B, under extreme low-bit compression. LieQ keeps uniform bit-width within each layer while mixing precision across layers, preserving standard multiplication kernels and avoiding irregular memory access, codebooks, or irregular formats at inference time. Our method uncovers a strong correlation between layer-wise functional saliency and representational compactness, revealing that layers with higher training-induced energy concentration are functionally irreplaceable. Leveraging this insight, we propose a purely geometry-driven sensitivity proxy that enables automatic bit-width allocation under a target average-bit budget without expensive gradient updates or inference-based perplexity probing. Under an average weight bit-width approaching two bits per parameter, LieQ consistently reduces the large accuracy gap typically observed for naive uniform 2-bit baselines on Qwen3 and LLaMA3.x families, while retaining standard-kernel efficiency. These properties make LieQ a practical path toward deploying small language models on resource-constrained edge devices. Code will be available at: https://github.com/HeXiao-55/LieQ-official.git.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) effectively improves the accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, retrieval noises significantly undermine the quality of LLMs’ generation, necessitating the development of denoising mechanisms. Previous works extract evidence straightforwardly without deep thinking, which may risk filtering out key clues and struggle with generalization. To this end, we propose EviOmni, which learns to extract rational evidence via reasoning first and then extracting. Specifically, EviOmni integrates evidence reasoning and evidence extraction into one unified trajectory, followed by knowledge token masking to avoid information leakage, optimized via on-policy reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards in terms of answer, length, and format. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets show the superiority of EviOmni, which provides compact and high-quality evidence, enhances the accuracy of downstream tasks, and supports both traditional and agentic RAG systems.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) have mastered syntax-level code generation, complex algorithmic reasoning remains a challenge, typically addressed by scaling model depth and parameter count. Universal Transformers (UT) offer a compelling alternative by introducing a recurrent inductive bias that aligns with the recursive nature of programming logic. However, training looped architectures at scale has historically been hindered by severe instability and optimization difficulties associated with backpropagation through time (BPTT). We present LoopCoder (40B-A80B) pre-trained on 12T+ code and general tokens, along with LoopCoder-Thinking and LoopCoder-Instruct variants—the first large-scale looped transformer for code, achieving comparable performance to standard dense architectures with more parameters. Unlike prior approaches that restrict recurrence to small-scale tasks, we implement a comprehensive looped training protocol spanning both pre-training and post-training phases. We initiate the model via dense-to-loop transformation, folding a pre-trained dense checkpoint to initialize a recurrent block, followed by rigorous looped pre-training and specialized post-training for instruction following and reasoning. Our results establish a robust recipe for scaling coding intelligence via recurrent computation, proving that dense checkpoints serve as an optimal foundation for evolving into dynamic, looped reasoners.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding has emerged as a promising approach to accelerate autoregressive inference in large language models (LLMs). Self-draft methods, which leverage the base LLM itself for speculation, avoid the overhead of auxiliary draft models but face critical limitations: shallow layers often produce overconfident yet incorrect token predictions, and the presence of difficult tokens in a draft sequence forces redundant computation through deeper layers, undermining both draft acceptance and overall speedup. To address these issues, we propose a novel self-draft framework that suppresses spurious confidence via layer-wise temperature annealing in early-exit decision and adaptively bounds speculation length based on token-wise decoding difficulty. By reprocessing the hidden states of draft tokens in a unified parallel pass through deep layers when speculation terminates, our method maintains exact output equivalence with the original model while maximizing computational efficiency. It requires no modifications to the base LLM parameters and achieves up to 2.33× wall-time speedup over standard autoregressive decoding across diverse long-form generation tasks and multiple model architectures.

Abstract:
The emergence of reasoning models, exemplified by OpenAI o1, signifies a transition from intuitive to deliberative cognition, effectively reorienting the scaling laws from pre-training paradigms toward test-time computation. While Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) has shown promise in this domain, existing approaches typically treat each rollout as an isolated trajectory. This lack of information sharing leads to severe inefficiency and substantial computational redundancy, as the search process fails to leverage insights from prior explorations. To address these limitations, we propose PRISM-MCTS, a novel reasoning framework that draws inspiration from human parallel thinking and reflective processes. PRISM-MCTS integrates a Process Reward Model (PRM) with a dynamic shared memory, capturing both "Heuristics" and "Fallacies". By reinforcing successful strategies and pruning error-prone branches, PRISM-MCTS effectively achieves refinement. Furthermore, we develop a data-efficient training strategy for the PRM, achieving high-fidelity evaluation under a few-shot regime. Empirical evaluations across diverse reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of PRISM-MCTS. Notably, it halves the trajectory requirements on GPQA while surpassing MCTS-RAG and Search-o1, demonstrating that it scales inference by reasoning judiciously rather than exhaustively.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in audio diffusion models have significantly improved text-to-audio editing via inversion techniques. However, these models typically rely on dense, fixed-step sampling trajectories to maintain structural integrity during inversion and generation, leading to prohibitive computational costs. We propose AdaTE, a model-agnostic Adaptive Trajectory Extrapolation framework that accelerates the inversion-based editing process by dynamically evaluating only the most critical generative phases. Specifically, we introduce a hierarchical probing mechanism that monitors curvature acceleration and information gain to detect pivotal transitions within the latent flow. This allows the model to selectively skip redundant segments via linear extrapolation while preserving dense neural evaluations for complex semantic changes. Extensive experiments across AudioLDM2, Auffusion, and Tango2 demonstrate that AdaTE achieves up to a 3.9 × speedup with negligible loss in fidelity. AdaTE significantly shifts the Pareto frontier, providing an efficient solution for high-fidelity audio synthesis and editing.

Abstract:
The deployment of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for real-world document question answering is often constrained by dynamic, user-defined policies that dictate information disclosure based on context. While ensuring adherence to these explicit constraints is critical, existing safety research primarily focuses on implicit social norms or text-only settings, overlooking the complexities of multimodal documents. In this paper, we introduce Doc-PP (Document Policy Preservation Benchmark), a novel benchmark constructed from real-world reports requiring reasoning across heterogeneous visual and textual elements under strict non-disclosure policies. Our evaluation highlights a systemic Reasoning-Induced Safety Gap: models frequently leak sensitive information when answers must be inferred through complex synthesis or aggregated across modalities, effectively circumventing existing safety constraints. Furthermore, we identify that providing extracted text improves perception but inadvertently facilitates leakage. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose DVA (Decompose–Verify–Aggregation), a structural inference framework that decouples reasoning from policy verification. Experimental results demonstrate that DVA significantly outperforms standard prompting defenses, offering a robust baseline for policy-compliant document understanding.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in Text-to-SQL tasks, their deployment in real-world environments is hindered by latent reliability issues. Identifying these latent weaknesses is critical for building trustworthy database interfaces, yet current diagnostic approaches rely heavily on static, expert-defined rules, which lack the capability for systematic and automated exploration. To bridge this gap, we propose SAGE (Systematic Automated Guided Exploration), a novel framework designed to autonomously uncover latent failure patterns in LLM-based Text-to-SQL generation. Specifically, SAGE generates vulnerability hypotheses for given samples and references a continuously evolving Vulnerability Codex to design targeted perturbations, thereby iteratively verifying and documenting potential defects. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art open-source LLMs demonstrate that SAGE uncovers a substantial number of failure cases, highlighting the significant fragility of current models. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that the Vulnerability Codex exhibits strong cross-model transferability, indicating that the discovered patterns represent generalized structural weaknesses. Finally, we explore SAGE’s potential for remediation. Furthermore, a preliminary attempt at lightweight fine-tuning on the generated samples yields promising improvements, suggesting a scalable pathway for closing the reliability loop in future work.

Abstract:
The wide deployment of LLMs has made model alignment necessary to make newly trained models safely and effectively respond to user instructions. Among different methods, inference-time alignment is often cheaper as it intervenes (i.e., offers guidances) only during output generation. Existing proposals apply guidances extracted from certain aligned models without properly assessing their reliability. Nonetheless, our systematic evaluation reveals that guidance effectiveness varies drastically across models; since ineffective guidances lead to further confusion and thus further interventions, the resulting excessive interventions typically indicate poor performance. To make interventions more effective and thus more efficient, we introduce BlendIn, an inference-time alignment framework that shifts from binary decisions to creating hybrid distributions integrating both models’ knowledge. BlendIn stabilizes inference-time alignment by performing quality-aware alignment and proportionally weighting each model’s contribution based on reliability. Compared with existing works, it preserves beneficial guidance while downweighting unreliable suggestions. BlendIn provides both diagnostic signals and mitigation strategies for misaligned guidance, achieving consistent and up to 50% performance improvement on challenging model pairs. Our code is available at: https://github.com/DecayingSeart/BlendIn.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates large language model inference by allowing a lightweight draft model to propose outputs that a stronger target model verifies. However, its token-centric nature allows erroneous steps to propagate. Prior approaches mitigate this using external reward models, but incur additional latency, computational overhead, and limit generalizability. We propose SpecGuard, a verification-aware speculative decoding framework that performs step-level verification using only model-internal signals. At each step, SpecGuard samples multiple draft candidates and selects the most consistent step, which is then validated using an ensemble of two lightweight model-internal signals: (i) an attention-based grounding score that measures attribution to the input and previously accepted steps, and (ii) a log-probability-based score that captures token-level confidence. These signals jointly determine whether a step is accepted or recomputed using the target, allocating compute selectively. Experiments across a range of reasoning benchmarks show that SpecGuard improves accuracy by 3.6% while reducing latency by ~11%, outperforming both SD and reward-guided SD.

Abstract:
The integration of large language models (LLMs) with external tools has significantly expanded the capabilities of AI agents. However, as the diversity of both LLMs and tools increases, selecting the optimal model-tool combination becomes a high-dimensional optimization challenge. Existing approaches often rely on a single model or fixed tool-calling logic, failing to exploit the performance variations across heterogeneous model-tool pairs. In this paper, we present ATLAS (Adaptive Tool-LLM Alignment and Synergistic Invocation), a dual-path framework for dynamic tool usage in cross-domain complex reasoning. ATLAS operates via a dual-path approach: (1) training-free cluster-based routing that exploits empirical priors for domain-specific alignment, and (2) RL-based multi-step routing that explores autonomous trajectories for out-of-distribution generalization. Extensive experiments across 15 benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms closed-source models like GPT-4o as well as existing routing methods on both in-distribution (+10.1%) and out-of-distribution (+13.1%) tasks. Furthermore, our framework shows significant gains in visual reasoning by orchestrating specialized multi-modal tools.

Abstract:
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has become a prevalent approach for adapting large language models (LLMs). However, low-rank adaptation methods face an inherent trade-off: improving target task performance can compromise pre-trained world knowledge, while aggressively constraining updates to preserve world knowledge may hinder improvements in the target task. Furthermore, most current methods fail to account for layer-wise differences in adaptation sensitivity, resulting in suboptimal preservation of world knowledge and task adaptation. To address these challenge, we propose Fisher-Optimized Adaptive Low Rank and Singular-VectorSelection (FARSS), an effective framework for knowledge-preserving fine-tuning. This framework introduces two key innovations. First, we propose a Fisher-guided adaptive rank allocation strategy, which assigns smaller ranks to shallow layers that are critical for preserving world knowledge, and larger ranks to deep layers that are essential for task adaptation. Second, we introduce a task-aware initialization method that integrates singular value information with layer-specific second-order statistics estimated from activation and gradient covariances, enabling efficient and task-sensitive low-rank updates. We evaluated several models across various tasks, and the experimental results show that our approach outperforms existing PEFT methods, including LoRA, Corda, and KaSA, achieving a balance between preserving world knowledge and enhancing target task performance. The code is available at https://github.com/chenyehuang/FARSS.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents significantly extend the utility of LLMs by interacting with dynamic environments. However, enabling agents to continually learn new tasks without catastrophic forgetting remains a critical challenge, known as the stability–plasticity dilemma.In this work, we argue that this dilemma fundamentally arises from the failure to explicitly distinguish between common knowledge shared across tasks and conflicting knowledge introduced by task-specific interference. To address this, we propose Agent-Dice, a parameter fusion framework based on directional consensus evaluation.Concretely, Agent-Dice disentangles knowledge updates through a two-stage process: geometric consensus filtering to prune conflicting gradients, and curvature-based importance weighting to amplify shared semantics.We provide a rigorous theoretical analysis that establishes the validity of the proposed fusion scheme and offers insight into the origins of the stability–plasticity dilemma. Extensive experiments on GUI agents and tool-use agent domains demonstrate that Agent-Dice exhibits outstanding continual learning performance with minimal computational overhead and parameter updates.

Abstract:
Presentation slides are a primary medium for data-driven reporting, yet keeping complex, analytics-style decks up to date remains labor-intensive. Existing automation methods mostly follow fixed template filling and cannot support dynamic updates for diverse, user-authored slide decks. We therefore define “Dynamic Slide Update via Natural Language Instructions on User-provided Templates” and introduce DynaSlide, a large-scale benchmark with 20,036 real-world instruction–execution triples (source slide, user instruction, target slide) grounded in a shared external database and built from business reporting slides under bring-your-own-template (BYO-template) conditions. To tackle this task, we propose SlideAgent, an agent-based framework that combines multimodal slide parsing, natural language instruction grounding, and tool-augmented reasoning for tables, charts, and textual conclusions. SlideAgent updates content while preserving layout and style, providing a strong reference baseline on DynaSlide. We further design end-to-end and component-level evaluation protocols that reveal key challenges and opportunities for future research. The dataset and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/604E/ .

Abstract:
Multi-round batch knowledge editing often suffers from performance degradation as edits accumulate. Focusing on the locate-then-edit paradigm, we analyze this phenomenon from a spectral perspective and identify a previously overlooked structural factor: the intrinsic knowledge of the model and historical edit memories exhibit markedly different spectral characteristics and information distributions, yet are naively coupled and jointly inverted during editing. Based on this insight, we propose SpecEdit to improve the model editing from a spectral perspective. SpecEdit performs spectral decoupling to isolate editing-critical directions and reduce destructive coupling, followed by spectral-structure-aware information compensation and spectral fusion to construct a refined closed-form solution. The module integrates seamlessly into existing editing methods without altering their original optimization procedures. Experiments on multiple LLMs and editing methods show that SpecEdit consistently improves performance, demonstrating that modeling spectral structure is an effective, interpretable approach and a promising direction for future research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for text understanding and generation, with increasing deployment in applications involving sensitive user inputs. This raises significant privacy concerns, motivating the adoption of differential privacy (DP) to protect prompts during LLM inference. However, most existing DP methods assume single-turn interactions, whereas real-world usage often relies on multi-turn dialogue. Consequently, these single-turn-based methods break down in multi-turn settings, where recurring tokens repeatedly consume the privacy budget under DP, leading to accumulated privacy loss and degraded cross-turn semantic coherence.To address these challenges, we propose DP 3 , a differentially private prompt perturbation framework for multi-turn LLM inference. DP 3 constructs a perturbation mapping table to reuse perturbations for recurring tokens, reducing redundant privacy costs. It also defines a context-aware utility function that combines embedding distance with attention-based contextual representations to maintain semantic consistency across turns. Additionally, DP 3 introduces a two-stage bucketed exponential mechanism to manage long-tail phenomena in large candidate spaces.Experimental results on multi-turn dialogue tasks demonstrate that DP 3 offers a better privacy-utility trade-off and stronger resistance to inference attacks compared to existing methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/XidianNSS/DP3.

Abstract:
Vulnerability detection with language models is challenging: it requires (i) precisely localizing security-sensitive code and (ii) reasoning about potential vulnerability conditions under complex, partially observed program context. We present VulAgent, a multi-agent vulnerability detection framework based on hypothesis validation. Our design is inspired by how human auditors review code: when noticing a sensitive operation, they form a hypothesis about a possible vulnerability, consider potential trigger paths, and then verify the hypothesis against the project context. Given a code unit, VulAgent first applies multi-view analyzers to identify and localize security-sensitive operations from complementary perspectives. For each sensitive operation, it then constructs an explicit vulnerability hypothesis—including triggering (or exploitation) preconditions and a candidate trigger path—and validates the hypothesis using project context together with the model’s general knowledge of commonly used APIs and security patterns. This validation-oriented design reduces speculative reports and substantially lowers false positives. Across PrimeVul and SVEN, VulAgent improves accuracy by 6.6 percentage points on average, increases vulnerable–fixed pair identification by up to 4.5x (2.46x on average), and reduces false positive rate by 36% relative to recent LLM-based baselines.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in autonomous agent settings, small language models (SLMs) remain fragile, often collapsing after encountering errors. Traditional knowledge distillation focuses on imitating successful trajectories, while existing "learning from mistakes" methods treat errors as auxiliary signals rather than states requiring recoverable policies, leaving the dynamics of failure and recovery in agent settings largely unexplored. Inspired by Donald Schön’s theory of reflective practice, we propose P-BRIDGE (Pedagogical Bridge for Reflective Insight and Distillation of Guiding Errors). P-BRIDGE combines reflection-in-action with reflection-on-action, enabling agents to diagnose and correct critical errors during execution while abstracting transferable strategies from contrastive student–teacher trajectories. Experiments across eight benchmarks demonstrate that P-BRIDGE significantly elevates SLM performance—e.g., raising the 2WikiMultiHopQA accuracy of a 0.6B model from 6.2% to 34.2%.

Abstract:
Selecting an appropriate LLM configuration for a given query is critical, yet existing routing frameworks operate within a single computational paradigm. To address this gap, we formalize the Cross-System Routing Problem, a hierarchical decision-making task that decomposes routing into intra-regime configuration selection and inter-regime system selection. Building on this, we propose BiCSRouter, a bi-level cross-system routing framework that integrates two orthogonal regimes: intensive reasoning via single-agent systems and extensive collaboration via multi-agent systems. BiCSRouter performs policy learning within each system and employs a lightweight inter-regime router that selects the optimal regime based on predicted performance and cost. Experiments on the MBPP and MATH benchmarks demonstrate that BiCSRouter outperforms 15 representative baselines across three types. On MBPP, compared to the performance ceiling of GPT-5, BiCSRouter achieves a 46% reduction in cost with only a 2% drop in accuracy. Finally, we show that BiCSRouter can extend to additional regimes, highlighting its generality as a cross-system routing framework.

Abstract:
Prior work synthesizes tool-use LLM datasets by first generating a user query, followed by complex tool-use annotations like DFS. This inherently leads to inevitable annotation failures and low efficiency in data generation. We introduce ToolGrad, an agentic framework that inverts this paradigm. ToolGrad first constructs valid tool-use chains through an iterative process guided by textual "gradients", and then synthesizes corresponding user queries. This "answer-first" approach led to ToolGrad-500, a dataset generated with more complex tool use, lower cost, and almost 100% pass rate. Experiments show that models trained on ToolGrad-500 outperform those trained on expensive baseline datasets and proprietary LLMs.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has shown significant promise for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, prevailing algorithms like GRPO broadcast a uniform advantage signal across all tokens in a sequence. This coarse-grained approach overlooks the pivotal role of uncertain, high-stakes decisions during reasoning, leading to inefficient exploration and the well-documented problem of entropy collapse. To address this, we introduce UnCertainty-aware Advantage Shaping (UCAS), a model-free method that refines credit assignment by leveraging the model’s internal uncertainty signals. UCAS operates in two stages: it first modulates the response-level advantage using the model’s overall self-confidence, and then applies a token-level penalty based on raw logit certainty. This dual mechanism encourages exploration of high-uncertainty paths that yield correct answers while penalizing overconfident yet erroneous reasoning, effectively balancing the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Extensive experiments on five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that UCAS significantly outperforms strong RLVR baselines across multiple model scales, including 1.5B and 7B. Our analysis confirms that UCAS not only achieves higher rewards but also promotes greater reasoning diversity and successfully mitigates entropy collapse.

Abstract:
Recent advances in diffusion-based Multimodal Large Language Models (dMLLMs) offer a compelling alternative to autoregressive counterparts; however, they remain prone to hallucinations. Through information flow analysis on LLaDA-V, we identify two intertwined factors contributing to this issue. First, although the special tokens serve as semantic anchors for aggregating visual information, they simultaneously induce severe attention sinks, excessively consuming the model’s attention budget. Second, the long-range decay inherent in Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) leads to semantic blind spots, preventing these anchors from uniformly perceiving the entire visual input. Accordingly, our objective is to moderately alleviate the attention sink effect on semantic anchors while enhancing their ability to aggregate global visual information, thereby eliminating semantic blind spots. To this end, we propose Extrinsic Distance-Aware Regularization (EDAR), a training-free decoding strategy that augments the attention key space with a static, distance-aware matrix. This matrix jointly redistributes excessive attention away from anchors and injects absolute positional bias to ensure uniform visual coverage. Experiments on LLaDA-V demonstrate that EDAR effectively eliminates semantic blind spots and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both hallucination-specific and general multimodal benchmarks.

Abstract:
Recent Audio Large Language Models (AudioLLMs) exhibit a striking performance inversion: while excelling at complex reasoning tasks, they consistently underperform on fine-grained acoustic perception. We attribute this gap to a fundamental limitation of ASR-centric training, which provides precise linguistic targets but implicitly teaches models to suppress paralinguistic cues and acoustic events as noise. To address this, we propose Unified Audio Schema (UAS), a holistic and structured supervision framework that organizes audio information into three explicit components—Transcription, Paralinguistics, and Non-linguistic Events—within a unified JSON format. This design achieves comprehensive acoustic coverage without sacrificing the tight audio-text alignment that enables reasoning. We validate the effectiveness of this supervision strategy by applying it to both discrete and continuous AudioLLM architectures. Extensive experiments on MMSU, MMAR, and MMAU demonstrate that UAS-Audio yields consistent improvements, boosting fine-grained perception by 10.9% on MMSU over the same-size state-of-the-art models while preserving robust reasoning capabilities. Our code and model are publicly available at https://github.com/Tencent/Unified_Audio_Schema.

Abstract:
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) enables low-cost adaptation of large language models but often suffers from limited representational flexibility. To address this, we incorporate a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) design and propose Efficient and Expressive split-path experts that enhance specialization while maintaining low resource overhead. Split-Path Adaptive Representation Mixture-of-Experts (SparMoE) replaces discrete hard routing with a soft routing and fully-activated mixture, enabling stable optimization. Each expert is parameterized as a split-path modulation module, consisting of a scaling path that promotes expert specialization and a bias path that preserves expert-specific signals. This design significantly enhances expressive capacity while maintaining strict parameter efficiency and architectural compatibility with PEFT. Extensive evaluations on GLUE, GSM8K, MBPP, and a text rewriting task from SmolTalk show that our approach consistently outperforms or matches state-of-the-art PEFT methods under comparable parameter budgets, achieving a favorable trade-off between adaptability and efficiency.

Abstract:
Implicit spatial relations and deep semantic structures encoded in object attributes are crucial for procedural planning in embodied AI systems. However, existing approaches often over-rely on the reasoning capabilities of vision language models (VLMs) themselves, while overlooking the rich structured semantic information that can be mined from multimodal inputs. As a result, models struggle to effectively understand functional spatial relationships in complex scenes. To fully exploit implicit spatial relations and deep semantic structures in multimodal data, we propose GaLa, a vision–language framework for multimodal procedural planning. GaLa introduces a hypergraph-based representation, where object instances in the image are modeled as nodes, and region-level hyperedges are constructed by aggregating objects according to their attributes and functional semantics. This design explicitly captures implicit semantic relations among objects as well as the hierarchical organization of functional regions. Furthermore, we design a Tri-View HyperGraph Encoder that enforces semantic consistency across the node view, area view, and node–area association view via contrastive learning, enabling hypergraph semantics to be more effectively injected into downstream VLM reasoning. Extensive experiments on the ActPlan-1K and ALFRED benchmarks demonstrate that GaLa significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of execution success rate, LCS, and planning correctness.

Abstract:
Deep Research agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited extraordinary potential in automated paper writing tasks. However, existing systems rely heavily on literature retrieval and synthesis through internet and local knowledge bases, often resulting research lacking insight and creativity in social science. To address this issue, we propose "Memory-Augmented Social Simulation (MASS)”, an innovative paradigm that leverages highly realistic and research-oriented social simulations to the creativity and empirical founding of LLMs-generated research. Specifically, MASS integrates three core components—dynamic goal-path planning with multi-level social norm restraint to guide the simulation, a multi-disciplinary behavior dataset for agent memory cold-start, and a structured forgetting mechanism inspired by the Ebbinghaus curve. Together, these ensure simulation authenticity and provide a robust empirical foundation for generating innovative scholarly papers. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, showing a 6.81% improvement in generation overall quality over foundation LLMs and 17.19% gain in Insight over strong baselines. Dataset and codes will be released.

Abstract:
While watermarking serves as a critical mechanism for LLM provenance, existing secret-key schemes tightly couple detection with injection, requiring access to keys or provider-side scheme-specific detectors for verification. This dependency creates a fundamental barrier for real-world governance, as independent auditing becomes impossible without compromising model security or relying on the opaque claims of service providers. To resolve this dilemma, we introduce TTP-Detect, a pioneering black-box framework designed for non-intrusive, third-party watermark verification. By decoupling detection from injection, TTP-Detect reframes verification as a relative hypothesis testing problem. It employs a proxy model to amplify watermark-relevant signals and a suite of complementary relative measurements to assess the alignment of the query text with watermarked distributions. Extensive experiments across representative watermarking schemes, datasets and models demonstrate that TTP-Detect achieves superior detection performance and robustness against diverse attacks.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) significantly enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models. When applied to RLVR, Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) offer a scalable source of verifiable data but risk inducing reward hacking, where models shortcut reasoning via random guessing or simple elimination. Current approaches often mitigate this by converting MCQs to open-ended formats, thereby discarding the contrastive signal provided by expert-designed distractors. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of option design on RLVR. Our analysis highlights two primary insights: (1) Mismatches in option counts between training and testing degrade performance. (2) Strong distractors effectively mitigate random guessing, enabling effective RLVR training even with 2-way questions. Motivated by these findings, we propose Iterative Distractor Curation (IDC), a framework that actively constructs high-quality distractors to block elimination shortcuts and promote deep reasoning. Experiments on various benchmarks demonstrate that our method effectively enhances distractor quality and yields significant gains in RLVR training compared to the original data.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly being deployed as automated content moderators. Within this landscape, we uncover a critical threat: Adversarial Smuggling Attacks. Unlike adversarial perturbations (for misclassification) and adversarial jailbreaks (for harmful output generation), adversarial smuggling exploits the Human-AI capability gap. It encodes harmful content into human-readable visual formats that remain AI-unreadable, thereby evading automated detection and enabling the dissemination of harmful content. We classify smuggling attacks into two pathways: (1) Perceptual Blindness, disrupting text recognition; and (2) Reasoning Blockade, inhibiting semantic understanding despite successful text recognition. To evaluate this threat, we constructed SmuggleBench, the first comprehensive benchmark comprising 1,700 adversarial smuggling attack instances. Evaluations on SmuggleBench reveal that both proprietary (e.g., GPT-5) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-VL) SOTA models are vulnerable to this threat, producing Attack Success Rates (ASR) exceeding 90%. By analyzing the vulnerability through the lenses of perception and reasoning, we identify three root causes: the limited capabilities of vision encoders, the robustness gap in OCR, and the scarcity of domain-specific adversarial examples. We conduct a preliminary exploration of mitigation strategies, investigating the potential of test-time scaling (via CoT) and adversarial training (via SFT) to mitigate this threat.

Abstract:
In LLM-based Text-to-SQL systems, unanswerable and underspecified user queries may generate not only incorrect text but also executable programs that yield misleading results or violate safety constraints, thus posing a major barrier to safe deployment. Existing refusal strategies for such queries either rely on output-level instruction following, which is brittle due to model hallucinations, or on estimating output uncertainty, which adds complexity and overhead. To address this challenge, we first formalize safe refusal in Text-to-SQL systems as an answerability-gating problem, and then propose LatentRefusal, a latent-signal refusal mechanism that predicts query answerability from intermediate hidden activations of an LLM. We introduce the Tri-Residual Gated Encoder (TRGE), a lightweight probing architecture, to suppress schema noise and amplify sparse, localized question–schema mismatch cues that indicate unanswerability. Extensive empirical evaluations across diverse ambiguous and unanswerable settings, together with ablations and interpretability analyses, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme and show that LatentRefusal provides an attachable, efficient safety layer for Text-to-SQL systems. Across four benchmarks, LatentRefusal achieves an average F1 of 88.5% and 88.8% on Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-3-8B respectively, while adding ~2ms probe overhead.

Abstract:
Vision–Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in tasks that require joint understanding of text and images. However, as many VLMs are built upon pre-trained large language models, they often over-rely on linguistic priors at the expense of visual features, causing persistent hallucinations. We observe that these hallucinations stem not only from insufficient visual attention but also from imbalanced activation profiles across attention heads, while hallucinated samples tend to disproportionately activate heads that fail to capture visual cues. To promote a more balanced attention distribution, we propose HWP, a strategy that incorporates head-wise attention perturbation via continuous multiplicative noise, coupled with a visual-guided loss focused on vision-sensitive text tokens. Beyond simply strengthening visual grounding, this design encourages a broader set of attention heads to engage with visual signals, thereby alleviating information loss caused by activation concentration on a few dominant heads. Consistent gains across different architectures and scales on multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our approach in mitigating VLM hallucinations.

Abstract:
Modeling human cognitive states is essential for advanced artificial intelligence. Existing Large Language Models (LLMs) mainly address isolated tasks such as emotion analysis or stance detection, and fail to capture interactions among cognitive dimensions defined in psychology, including emotion, thinking style, stance, and intention. To bridge this gap, we construct CognitiveBench, the first benchmark with unified annotations across the above four dimensions. Experiments on CognitiveBench show that although LLMs perform well on single dimension tasks, their performance drops sharply in joint multi-dimensional modeling. Using Gromov-hyperbolicity analysis, we find that CognitiveBench exhibits a strong hierarchical structure. We attribute the performance bottleneck to “Cognitive Crowding”, where hierarchical cognitive states require exponential representational space, while the Euclidean space of LLMs grows only polynomially, causing representation overlap and degraded performance. To address this mismatch, we propose HyCoLLM, which models cognitive states in hyperbolic space and aligns LLM representations via Hyperbolic Guided Alignment Tuning. Results show that HyCoLLM substantially improves multi-dimensional cognitive understanding, allowing 8B parameter model to outperform strong baselines, including GPT-4o. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/HycoLLM.

Abstract:
Claim verification with large language models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention, due to their strong reasoning capabilities and transparent verification processes compared to traditional answer-only judgments. However, existing approaches to online claim verification, which requires iterative evidence retrieval and reasoning, still mainly rely on prompt engineering or pre-designed reasoning workflows, without unified training to improve necessary skills. Therefore, we introduce Veri-R1, an online reinforcement learning (RL) framework that enables an LLM to interact with a search engine and to receive reward signals that explicitly shape its planning, retrieval, and reasoning behaviors. The dynamic interaction between models and retrieval systems more accurately reflects real-world verification scenarios and fosters comprehensive verification skills. Empirical results show that Veri-R1 improves joint accuracy by up to 30% and doubles evidence score, often surpassing its larger-scale model counterparts. Ablation studies further reveal the impact of reward components, and the link between output logits and label accuracy. Our results highlight the effectiveness of online RL for precise and faithful claim verification, and provide a foundation for future research.

Abstract:
Watermarking provides a critical safeguard for large language model (LLM) services by facilitating the detection of LLM-generated text. Correspondingly, stealing watermark algorithms (SWAs) derive watermark information from watermarked texts generated by victim LLMs to craft highly targeted adversarial attacks, which compromise the reliability of watermarks. Existing SWAs rely on fixed strategies, overlooking the non-uniform distribution of stolen watermark information and the dynamic nature of real-world LLM generation processes. To address these limitations, we propose Adaptive Stealing (AS), a novel SWA featuring enhanced design flexibility through Position-Based Seal Construction and Adaptive Selection modules. AS operates by defining multiple attack perspectives derived from distinct activation states of contextually ordered tokens.During attack execution, AS dynamically selects the optimal perspective based on watermark compatibility, generation priority, and dynamic generation relevance. Our experiments demonstrate that AS significantly increases steal efficiency against target watermarks under identical experimental conditions.These findings highlight the need for more robust LLM watermarks to withstand potential attacks. We release our code to the community for future research[].

Abstract:
Omni-modal Large Language Models (OLLMs) excel in diverse tasks but struggle with complex emotional reasoning, which requires integrating textual, visual, and acoustic signals. We attribute this limitation to modality collapse, where models over-rely on a dominant modality while neglecting complementary cues. To address this issue, we introduce OmniCoT, a data paradigm that interleaves guided tokens (e.g., [vision], [audio]) into reasoning traces to enforce structured evidence extraction. To further internalize the reasoning behaviors instilled by OmniCoT and facilitate adaptive modality prioritization, we propose Dynamic Modality-Entropy GRPO (DyME-GRPO), which utilizes entropy-based uncertainty estimates over Guided Tokens (GTs) to regulate modality usage, thereby mitigating collapse and informational redundancy. By applying supervised fine-tuning with OmniCoT followed by DyME-GRPO, we develop EmoOmni based on the Qwen2.5-Omni-7B backbone. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EmoOmni achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple emotion recognition and reasoning benchmarks while preserving the general capabilities of the base model. These findings highlight the potential of our work for omni-modal reasoning across a broader range of complex tasks.

Abstract:
Autoregressive (AR) decoding in large language models (LLMs) is latency-bounded by strictly sequential token generation.Speculative decoding mitigates this bottleneck by letting a fast drafter propose multi-token candidates that are then verified in parallel by the target model; yet most existing systems still rely on AR drafters, limiting wall-clock gains.We present DiffuSpec, which repurposes a diffusion language model (DLM) as a parallel drafter to generate multi-token proposals in a single forward pass while remaining compatible with standard AR verifiers.However, DLM drafting presents unique challenges: 1) bidirectional conditioning produces a token lattice where locally optimal tokens may fail to form a valid causal sequence; 2) the mechanism requires tuning the draft length, which induces a speed–quality trade-off. To address these issues, we introduce (i) Causal-consistency Path Search (CPS) to extract verifier-aligned causal paths from the lattice, and (ii) an Adaptive Draft-Length (ADL) controller that adjusts proposal lengths using online acceptance feedback.Across benchmarks, DiffuSpec achieves up to 3× wall-clock speedup and consistently outperforms strong baselines, demonstrating diffusion-based drafting as a competitive alternative to AR drafters for speculative decoding.

Abstract:
Recently, large reasoning models demonstrate exceptional performance on various tasks. However, reasoning models always consume excessive tokens even for simple queries, leading to resource waste and prolonged user latency. To address this challenge, we propose SelfBudgeter - a self-adaptive reasoning strategy for efficient and controllable reasoning. Specifically, we first train the model to self-estimate the required reasoning budget based on the query. We then introduce budget-guided GRPO for reinforcement learning, which effectively maintains accuracy while reducing output length. Experimental results demonstrate that SelfBudgeter dynamically allocates budgets according to problem complexity, achieving an average response length compression of 61% on math reasoning tasks while maintaining accuracy. Furthermore, SelfBudgeter allows users to see how long generation will take and decide whether to continue or stop. Additionally, users can directly control the reasoning length by setting token budgets upfront.

Abstract:
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs), such as linear attention and state-space models, have gained popularity due to their constant per-token complexity when processing long contexts. However, these recurrent models struggle with tasks that require accurate recall of contextual information from long contexts, because all contextual information is compressed into a fixed-size recurrent state. Previous studies have shown that recall ability is positively correlated with the recurrent state size, yet directly training RNNs with large recurrent states results in high training costs. In this paper, we introduce StateX, a post-training framework that efficiently expands the states of pre-trained RNNs. For two popular classes of RNNs, linear attention and state-space models, we design post-training architectural modifications in StateX, to scale up the state size with no or negligible increase in model parameters. Experiments on models with up to 1.3B parameters demonstrate that StateX efficiently enhances the recall and in-context learning performance of RNNs without incurring high post-training costs or compromising other capabilities.

Abstract:
Student Personas (SPs) are emerging as infrastructure for educational LLMs, yet prior work often relies on ad-hoc prompting or hand-crafted profiles with limited control over educational theory and population distributions. We formalize this as Theory-Aligned and Distribution-Controllable Persona Generation (TAD-PG) and introduce HACHIMI, a multi-agent Propose-Validate-Revise framework that generates theory-aligned, quota-controlled personas. HACHIMI factorizes each persona into a theory-anchored educational schema, enforces developmental and psychological constraints via a neuro-symbolic validator, and combines stratified sampling with semantic deduplication to reduce mode collapse. The resulting HACHIMI-1M corpus comprises 1 million personas for Grades 1-12. Intrinsic evaluation shows near-perfect schema validity, accurate quotas, and substantial diversity, while external evaluation instantiates personas as student agents answering CEPS and PISA 2022 surveys; across 16 cohorts, math and curiosity/growth constructs align strongly between humans and agents, whereas classroom-climate and well-being constructs are only moderately aligned, revealing a fidelity gradient. All personas are generated with Qwen2.5-72B, and HACHIMI provides a standardized synthetic student population for group-level benchmarking and social-science simulations. Resources available at https://github.com/ZeroLoss-Lab/HACHIMI.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly act as tool-using agents , and existing methods for evaluating and optimizing tool usage by LLMs typically assume a static tool environment with fixed APIs and documentation. In practice, toolsets evolve as tools are added, changed, or deprecated, introducing instability for agents that must retain prior competence while adapting to new capabilities. We formalize this challenge as the stability–adaptation dilemma. To address it, we propose ContDa, a continual documentation adaptation framework that provides a generalizable solution to this problem, enabling LLM agents to self-evolve by updating tool documentation. ContDa combines relation-guided exploration, which leverages functionally related existing tools as anchors to probe and identify new tool capabilities, with relation-aware adjustment that organizes overlapping tools and explicitly encodes usage preferences and fallback options among them. We then introduce complementary metrics that disentangle performance from stability and adaptation. Experiments across three evolution patterns on dynamic extensions of StableToolBench and RestBench show that ContDa consistently improves average performance by enhancing the discovery of new capabilities while incurring only limited loss of previously solved tasks, demonstrating documentation adaptation as an effective and lightweight mechanism for robust tool use in evolving environments. Our code is available at https://github.com/Bingo-W/ContDa.

Abstract:
Current retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods struggle with complex multi-hop reasoning, relying on unstructured semantic matching that lacks the logical structure needed to systematically guide retrieval. We introduce Programmatic Retrieval Optimization with Generative Reasoning and Augmented Multi-queries (PROGRAM), a novel framework that elevates retrieval to structured, program-guided reasoning. PROGRAM treats retrieval as execution of specific program types, such as logical, temporal, causal, and so forth, through three stages of ’Program-Type Selection’ with dual-metric optimization, ’Iterative Active Program Pruning’ with evidence accumulation, and ’Final Answer Generation’ with reranking. Evaluated on five benchmarks including HotPotQA, 2WikiMultihopQA, ARC-Challenge, MMLU-Pro, and MedQA with various LLMs, PROGRAM achieves state-of-the-art performance with up to 24% relative improvement on HotPotQA and 13.2% on MedQA over strong baselines including FLARE, ProbTree and Self-RAG.

Abstract:
Long-horizon conversational agents have to manage ever-growing interaction histories that quickly exceed the finite context windows of large language models (LLMs). Existing memory frameworks provide limited support for temporally structured information across hierarchical levels, often leading to fragmented memories and unstable long-horizon personalization. We present TiMem, a temporal–hierarchical memory framework that organizes conversations through a Temporal Memory Tree (TMT), enabling systematic memory consolidation from raw conversational observations to progressively abstracted persona representations. TiMem is characterized by three core properties: (1) temporal–hierarchical organization through TMT; (2) semantic-guided consolidation that enables memory integration across hierarchical levels without fine-tuning; and (3) complexity-aware memory recall that balances precision and efficiency across queries of varying complexity. Under a consistent evaluation setup, TiMem achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on both benchmarks, reaching 75.30% on LoCoMo and 76.88% on LongMemEval-S. It outperforms all evaluated baselines while reducing the recalled memory length by 52.20% on LoCoMo. Manifold analysis indicates clear persona separation on LoCoMo and reduced dispersion on LongMemEval-S. Overall, TiMem treats temporal continuity as a first-class organizing principle for long-horizon memory in conversational agents. The code is available at https://github.com/TiMEM-AI/timem.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) allocate substantial inference-time compute to Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, improving performance on mathematics, scientific QA, and tool usage. However, this introduces overthinking: LRMs often reach a correct intermediate solution, continue reasoning, and overwrite it with an incorrect answer. We first demonstrate that oracle stopping—where we inject lt;/think gt; at every sentence boundary and select the best stopping point in hindsight—improves average accuracy by 8% while reducing thinking tokens by 72%, exposing substantial overthinking. Motivated by this finding, we propose ThinkBrake, which monitors the log-probability margin between the top continuation token and lt;/think gt; at sentence boundaries, stopping reasoning when this margin narrows. ThinkBrake requires no training and achieves favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-offs across math, scientific QA, and tool usage benchmarks, reducing thinking token usage by up to 30%. Furthermore, we provide theoretical analysis showing that ThinkBrake is equivalent to test-time realignment with a reward bonus for the lt;/think gt; token.

Abstract:
Argumentation skills are an essential toolkit for large language models (LLMs). These skills are crucial in various use cases, including self-reflection, debating collaboratively for diverse answers, and countering hate speech. In this paper, we create the first benchmark for a standardized evaluation of LLM-based approaches to computational argumentation, encompassing 33 datasets from previous work in unified form. Using the benchmark, we evaluate the generalizability of five LLM families across 46 computational argumentation tasks that cover mining arguments, assessing perspectives, assessing argument quality, reasoning about arguments, and generating arguments. On the benchmark, we conduct an extensive systematic analysis of the contribution of few-shot examples, reasoning steps, model size, and training skills to the performance of LLMs on the computational argumentation tasks in the benchmark.

Abstract:
Reasoning-tuned LLMs utilizing long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) excel at single-answer tasks, yet their ability to model Human Label Variation—which requires capturing probabilistic ambiguity rather than resolving it—remains underexplored. We investigate this through systematic disentanglement experiments on distribution-based tasks, employing Cross-CoT experiments to isolate the effect of reasoning text from intrinsic model priors. We observe a distinct "decoupled mechanism": while CoT improves distributional alignment, final accuracy is dictated by CoT content (99% variance contribution), whereas distributional ranking is governed by model priors (over 80%). Step-wise analysis further shows that while CoT’s influence on accuracy grows monotonically during the reasoning process, distributional structure is largely determined by LLM’s intrinsic priors. These findings suggest that long CoT serves as a decisive LLM decision-maker for the top option but fails to function as a granular distribution calibrator for ambiguous tasks.

Abstract:
Time series forecasting underpins critical decision-making across diverse domains. While large language models (LLMs) offer promising reasoning capabilities, existing LLM-based time series forecasting approaches either reduce them to numerical predictors that bypass their strengths, or allow direct forecast generation that destabilizes predictions in non-stationary settings. We introduce CTRL, a framework that decouples semantic reasoning from quantitative prediction. A frozen backbone generates base forecasts, while specialized LLM agents function as controllers that analyze backbone prediction errors through decomposed trend, seasonal, and irregular components, grounding reasoning in interpretable temporal structure. Each agent outputs compact control signals that a lightweight residual decoder translates into forecast corrections. CTRL incorporates label-free test-time adaptation that detects distribution shift from input statistics alone and readapts control signals with only 3–24 LLM calls via caching. CTRL is explicitly designed to improve robustness under non-stationary temporal dynamics and distribution shift, while remaining competitive on highly stationary time series where adaptive correction provides limited additional benefit.

Abstract:
Emojis are widely used in online financial communication, but it is unclear whether they provide transferable sentiment signals across languages, platforms, and asset communities. This study examines the extent to which emoji usage, semantics, and sentiment polarity remain stable across financial communities, and how these layers influence zero-shot sentiment transfer. Using large corpora of Twitter and StockTwits posts in four languages, we measure cross-community divergence and evaluate sentiment models trained under emoji-only, text-only, and text+emoji inputs.We find that emoji frequencies differ across communities, especially across languages, but their semantics and sentiment polarity are largely stable. Cross-asset transferability shows minimal degradation, while cross-language transfer remains the most challenging. Including emojis consistently reduces transfer gaps relative to text-only models. These results indicate that financial communication exhibits a partially shared “emoji code,” and that emojis provide compact, language-independent sentiment cues that improve model generalization across markets and platforms.

Abstract:
Text-to-SQL enables users to query databases using natural language by generating executable SQL queries. Recent methods have increasingly adopted Large Language Models based reinforcement learning (RL) to leverage execution feedback for training. However, existing RL methods assign uniform query-level rewards to all clauses in a SQL query, treating correct and incorrect clauses equally. This coarse-grained reward design leads to insufficient learning signals for correct SQL generation. To address this issue, we propose EXPO-SQL (EXecution-based clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to-SQL) which provides fine-grained supervision through clause-level rewards. To assign clause-level rewards, our method identifies erroneous clauses by analyzing execution results, including error messages and clause-wise incremental execution. Experiments on widely-used Text-to-SQL benchmarks demonstrate that EXPO-SQL significantly outperforms existing supervised fine-tuning, prompting, and RL-based methods through fine-grained clause-level learning. Our code is available at https://github.com/jhn25/EXPO-SQL.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to multi-turn jailbreaking attacks that exploit conversational context to bypass safety constraints gradually. These attacks target different harm categories through distinct conversational approaches. Existing multi-turn methods often rely on heuristic or ad hoc exploration strategies, providing limited insight into underlying model weaknesses. The relationship between conversation patterns and model vulnerabilities across harm categories remains poorly understood. We propose Pattern Enhanced Chain of Attack (PE-CoA), a framework of five conversation patterns to construct multi-turn jailbreaks through natural dialogue. Evaluating PE-CoA on twelve LLMs spanning ten harm categories, we achieve state-of-the-art performance, uncovering pattern-specific vulnerabilities and LLM behavioral characteristics: models exhibit distinct weakness profiles, defense to one pattern does not generalize to others, and model families share similar failure modes. These findings highlight limitations of safety training and indicate the need for pattern-aware defenses. Code available on: https://github.com/Ragib-Amin-Nihal/PE-CoA

Abstract:
Zero-Shot Composed Image Retrieval (ZS-CIR) retrieves target images using a reference image and modification text without task-specific training. Existing methods typically rely on MLLMs to generate query vectors with pre-trained models like CLIP. However, those constructed queries suffer from inherent cognitive bias due to unknown candidate distribution. We propose CoRR, a training-free framework that reframes ZS-CIR as a self-correcting process through bias-aware query refinement. CoRR uses retrieved results as feedback to perceive the candidate distribution. With carefully designed CoT prompting, the MLLM inspects the retrieved candidates to identify intent misalignments in the query and then corrects them via Historical Query Fusion. We also introduce Retrieval-Driven Caption Optimization to provide context-aligned examples, reducing phrasing and style mismatches. Experiments on public benchmarks show that CoRR significantly outperforms other SOTA methods.

Abstract:
Generating and voting multiple answers is an effective method to mitigate reasoning inconsistencies of large language models (LLMs). Prior works have shown that multiple reasoning formats outperform a single format when generating multiple answers. However, previous works using multiple formats rely on formats labeled by humans, which could be unsuitable for all tasks and have high labeling costs. To address this issue, we adapt suitable formats to the given tasks by generating and selecting formats. We first propose how to measure the reasoning error when generating multiple answers. Then, we introduce Format-Adapter, which utilizes LLMs to generate and select suitable reasoning formats by minimizing the error measurement we present. We conduct experiments on math and commonsense reasoning tasks, where Format-Adapter achieves a 4.3% performance improvement on average over previous works, demonstrating the effectiveness.

Abstract:
Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to predict learners’ future performance from past interactions. While recent KT approaches have improved via learning item representations aligned with Knowledge Components, they overlook the procedural dynamics of problem solving. We propose Behavior-Aware Item Modeling (BAIM), a framework that enriches item representations by integrating dynamic procedural solution information. BAIM leverages a reasoning language model to decompose each item’s solution into four problem-solving stages (i.e., understand, plan, carry out, and look back), pedagogically grounded in Polya’s framework. Specifically, it derives stage-level representations from per-stage embedding trajectories, capturing latent signals beyond surface features. To reflect learner heterogeneity, BAIM adaptively routes these stage-wise representations, introducing a context-conditioned mechanism within a KT backbone, allowing different procedural stages to be emphasized for different learners. Experiments on XES3G5M and NIPS34 show that BAIM consistently outperforms strong pretraining-based baselines, achieving particularly large gains under repeated learner interactions.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly proposed as conversational agents in healthcare, yet many existing systems treat roles as static prompts and rely on one-shot safety filters. In such designs, it can be difficult to enforce long-horizon responsibilities, stable role identity, and realistic communication behavior. We propose a Self-Evolving LLM Agent that learns from role-based social experience and explicitly models communicator-level individual traits informed by prior communication questionnaires and clinical literature. The agent integrates (i) perception and action conditioned on both hard role responsibility norms and soft trait-conditioned style preferences, (ii) structured memory storing norm-annotated trajectories and identity states, (iii) dual-layer reflection that combines short-term responsibility diagnosis with long-term identity drift detection via trait consistency and trait-norm compatibility checks, and (iv) self-evolution that updates system prompts and identity parameters through preference-style optimization with AI feedback. We instantiate the framework in a multi-role healthcare sandbox and evaluate outpatient medication review, emergency triage, and discharge planning. Across our simulated tasks, self-evolution is associated with lower severity-weighted norm risk, more stable role-identity signals, and improved social embeddedness metrics (including trust-like signals) relative to strong static baselines.

Abstract:
Masked Discrete Diffusion Models (MDMs) enable parallel generation via iterative refinement. However, we identify a critical decisional mismatch. The MDM architecture is inherently dynamic and capable of sensing context shifts. In contrast, prevailing decoding paradigms remain static and myopic. They treat each denoising step as an isolated snapshot, effectively discarding valuable temporal feedback that signals logical conflicts. To bridge this gap, we propose Regret-Aware Confidence Calibration (RACC). This training-free framework aligns decoding decisions with the model’s latent self-correction capabilities. RACC introduces a momentum anchor to track confidence trajectories. When a token’s probability drops abruptly below its historical trend, the system triggers a "regret" signal. Unlike expensive re-masking or lookahead search, RACC utilizes this signal to proactively demote unstable candidates. Extensive experiments on reasoning benchmarks, such as HumanEval and GSM8K, demonstrate that RACC significantly improves generation consistency. Crucially, RACC achieves these gains with zero additional inference overhead, effectively balancing decoding quality and efficiency.

Abstract:
AI coding has emerged as a core application of large language models (LLMs), evolving from single-file coding tasks towards complex software engineering (SWE) scenarios. Recent advances in agents have enabled multi-file, multi-language, and dependency-aware AI coding, significantly expanding the scope of AI-assisted software development. While a variety of benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate coding capabilities in general-purpose or GPU coding ecosystems such as CUDA and ROCm, systematic evaluation for Huawei Ascend CANN remains largely underexplored. In this work, we propose LiveCANNBench, an SWE-level benchmark designed for AI coding in the CANN software stack. LiveCANNBench is constructed from real-world CANN repositories and consists of over 400 task instances spanning multi-file, multi-language, and execution-aware coding challenges. Unlike existing static benchmarks that primarily focus on kernel-level code generation, LiveCANNBench adopts a live benchmarking paradigm, effectively mitigating data leakage and enabling more reliable evaluation of modern coding agents.

Abstract:
As emotional support chatbots have recently gained significant traction across both research and industry, a common evaluation strategy has emerged: use help-seeker simulators to interact with supporter chatbots. However, current simulators suffer from two critical limitations: (1) they fail to capture the behavioral diversity of real-world seekers, often portraying them as overly cooperative, and (2) they lack the controllability required to simulate specific seeker profiles. To address these challenges, we present a controllable seeker simulator driven by nine psychological and linguistic features that underpin seeker behavior. Using authentic Reddit conversations, we train our model via a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, which effectively differentiates diverse seeker behaviors into specialized parameter subspaces, thereby enhancing fine-grained controllability. Our simulator achieves superior profile adherence and behavioral diversity compared to existing approaches. Furthermore, evaluating 7 prominent supporter models with our system uncovers previously obscured performance degradations. These findings underscore the utility of our framework in providing a more faithful and stress-tested evaluation for emotional support chatbots.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in the Generative Reward Model (GRM) have demonstrated its potential to enhance the reasoning abilities of LLMs through Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. Despite these gains, existing implementations of GRM suffer from two critical limitations. First, CoT prompting is applied indiscriminately to all inputs regardless of their inherent complexity. This introduces unnecessary computational costs for tasks amenable to fast, direct inference. Second, existing approaches primarily rely on voting-based mechanisms to evaluate CoT outputs, which often lack granularity and precision in assessing reasoning quality. In this paper, we propose E-GRM, an efficient generative reward modeling framework grounded in model-internal uncertainty. E-GRM leverages the convergence behavior of parallel model generations to estimate uncertainty and selectively trigger CoT reasoning only when needed, without relying on handcrafted features or task-dependent signals. To improve reward fidelity, we introduce a lightweight discriminative scorer trained with a hybrid regression–ranking objective to provide fine-grained evaluation of reasoning paths. Experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks show that E-GRM substantially reduces inference cost while consistently improving answer accuracy, demonstrating that model-internal uncertainty is an effective and general signal for efficient reasoning-aware reward modeling.

Abstract:
Distributed LLM inference avoids sending raw inputs by transmitting intermediate hidden states, a practice widely assumed to preserve privacy. We challenge this assumption and demonstrate that intermediate representations alone are sufficient to leak sensitive user attributes. This setting poses a fundamental obstacle for existing attribute inference attacks, which typically rely on auxiliary embedding-attribute pairs. To characterize this previously underexplored privacy risk, we reformulate attribute inference as zero-shot matching over candidate attributes directly in the intermediate representation space, and introduce a purely intermediate-representation-based attribute inference attack, termed IR-AIA. To address two structural challenges that hinder attribute inference from intermediate representations, we propose SG-APCR to address layer-dependent anisotropy in intermediate embeddings and a sliding-window similarity matching strategy to handle subword-level semantic fragmentation. Experiments across three LLMs and three real-world datasets show that sensitive attributes can be reliably inferred using only intermediate representations, achieving Top-1 accuracy of up to 0.997 on CMS, 0.980 on Skytrax, and 0.986 on ECHR. These results reveal that intermediate states commonly considered safe to share can expose sensitive personal attributes on their own.

Abstract:
The rapid discovery of jailbreak prompts has revealed the alarming fragility of safety alignment in frontier large language models (LLMs). While jailbreak techniques play a critical role in red-teaming and safety evaluation, existing methods exhibit three key limitations: (i) poor transferability across model families, requiring model-specific manual tuning; (ii) heavy reliance on large-scale prompt enumeration or exhaustive search, causing prohibitive query costs and poor scalability; and (iii) high sensitivity to input preprocessing or refusal-oriented fine-tuning, leading to attack failures once the underlying model is updated. To address these, we propose Experience-driven Multi-agent Jailbreak Optimization (EMJO), which couples three collaborating agents (Attacker, Analyzer, and Judge) into a closed-loop “probe–evaluate–revise” process, together with a dynamic experience bank accumulating high-quality successful prompts and reusable strategy patterns across iterations and tasks. This design enables query-efficient and transferable jailbreak optimization under black-box access. Extensive experiments on diverse LLMs demonstrate that EMJO consistently outperforms existing black-box jailbreak baselines, achieving up to 11% absolute improvement in attack success rate while reducing the average query cost by up to 7.9 × across two benchmark datasets. These results indicate that EMJO offers an effective and scalable paradigm for systematic jailbreak discovery.

Abstract:
Current research on large language models (LLMs) with retrieval-augmented code generation (RACG) has largely focused on single-language settings, leaving their cross-lingual effectiveness underexplored. Multilingual RACG systems are increasingly important for migrating and reusing code across programming languages (PLs), a common yet challenging task in modern software development. To systematically study cross-lingual code knowledge transfer in RACG, we construct a dataset covering 13 PLs with nearly 14K instances. Our experiments reveal three key insights: (1) Knowledge transfer in RACG across PLs is non-trivial even using direct injection. (2) RACG exhibits unequal cross-lingual knowledge transfer, and its efficacy depends on linguistic affinity of PL pair and diversity of LLM pretraining corpus. (3) RACG shows limited reliance on natural language information embedded in code when equipped with a code-specific retriever. These findings provide practical guidance for designing effective multilingual RACG systems. https://github.com/icip-cas/Cross-Lingual-RACG

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR), existing training paradigms face significant limitations: Zero-RL suffers from inefficient exploration and mode degradation due to a lack of prior guidance, while SFT-then-RL is limited by high data costs and capability plateaus caused by low-entropy collapse. To address these challenges, we propose E3-TIR (Enhanced Experience Exploitation), a warm-up paradigm for the early stages of agent training. Specifically, we formulate training as the dynamic integration of three experience types: Expert Prefixes, Expert Guided, and Self-Exploration. By executing diverse branching exploration around expert “anchors’’ and employing a mix policy optimization mechanism, we effectively mitigate distribution shifts and resolve optimization conflicts arising from shared prefixes. Our method dynamically adapts the model’s knowledge boundaries, effectively balancing exploration diversity with training efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that E3-TIR achieves a 6% performance improvement over traditional paradigms on tool-use tasks, while requiring less than 10% of the synthetic data. Furthermore, in terms of ROI—a comprehensive metric integrating performance, data cost, and training efficiency—we achieve a 1.46 gain compared to baselines.

Abstract:
Explainable AI (XAI) in high-stakes domains should help stakeholders trust and verify system outputs. Yet Chain-of-Thought methods reason before concluding, and logical gaps or hallucinations can yield conclusions that do not reliably align with their rationale. Thus, we propose “Result → Justify”, which constrains the output communication to present a conclusion before its structured justification. We introduce SEF (Structured Explainability Framework), operationalizing professional conventions (e.g., CREAC, BLUF) via six metrics for structure and grounding. Experiments across four tasks in three domains validate this approach: all six metrics correlate with correctness (r=0.20–0.42; p<0.001), and SEF achieves 83.9% accuracy (+5.3 over CoT). These results suggest structured justification can improve verifiability and may also improve reliability. Code is available at https://github.com/cqian03/SEF.

Abstract:
Masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) enable efficient parallel decoding but are limited by a monotonic unmasking policy, where committed tokens cannot be revised. While remasking-based methods mitigate early errors, they mainly intervene during generation. In this work, we study post-hoc refinement of a completed draft and find that naive correction often fails because of contextual lock-in, a phenomenon in which local error patterns become self-reinforcing. To address this, we propose PURE (Post-hoc Unlocking and REfinement), a training-free inference algorithm for two-phase decoding. PURE profiles confidence dynamics during drafting to identify unstable regions via an instability score ( 𝛥 i ), then unlocks them through deterministic window masking and stochastic leftward relaxation. On reasoning benchmarks, PURE substantially improves accuracy when applied to LLaDA-8B-Instruct, including a gain of +12.9 points over the baseline on GSM8K. These gains require only a small refinement budget, yielding a favorable compute-quality trade-off for discrete diffusion decoding.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) integrate visual encoders with Large Language Models (LLMs) and enable multimodal reasoning. However, for tasks that heavily rely on visual information, the model’s utilization of visual information remains unstable, which leads to reasoning failures. Prior works mainly strengthen multimodal reasoning by improving representation alignment or increasing computation. However, these methods do not explicitly characterize the differences in visual demands across tasks, making it difficult for the model to decide where and how strongly to attend to visual information. Consequently, visual attention allocation becomes a key factor that affects multimodal reasoning. To address these, we propose RATION, an entropy-driven task-adaptive visual attention allocation framework. First, we use a task routing strategy to infer the task type of each sample and identify the key layers. We use visual attention entropy as a control signal to dynamically allocate attention according to task demands. Experiments show that RATION achieves consistent performance gains across diverse reasoning tasks, datasets, and models, providing a clear direction toward more reliable multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
Multimodal emotion reasoning requires both accurate identification and logical rationales to explain emotional triggers. However, current methods often suffer from causal degeneracy, where models produce linguistically fluent but superficial explanations that lack authentic logical derivation. To resolve this, we propose CAIR (Causal Adaptive Information-based Reinforcement Learning), a reinforcement learning framework that treats rationales as causal mediators between raw perceptual signals and emotional semantics. Our core contribution is the Causal Mediation Reward (CMR), which quantifies a rationale’s interventional utility by measuring its marginal contribution to resolving predictive uncertainty. Additionally, we introduce an adaptive optimization mechanism based on the information bottleneck to balance perception and reasoning across varying cognitive loads. CAIR achieves state-of-the-art performance on MTMEUR with 73.80% accuracy and competitive results on the SCEA subset of EmoBench-M (68.5%), outperforming specialized SFT baselines by up to 14.4% while enhancing rationale faithfulness. Our findings underscore that principled reward design, rather than mere model scaling, is essential for building systems with authentic, human-like emotional understanding.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have rapidly advanced from perception tasks to complex multi-step reasoning, yet reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often leads to spurious reasoning since only the final-answer correctness is rewarded. To address this limitation, we propose AutoRubric, a framework that integrates RLVR with process-level supervision through automatically collected rubric-based generative rewards. Our key innovation lies in a scalable self-aggregation method that distills consistent reasoning checkpoints from successful trajectories, enabling problem-specific rubric construction without human annotation or stronger teacher models. By jointly leveraging rubric-based and outcome rewards, AutoRubric-R1V achieves state-of-the-art performance on six multimodal reasoning benchmarks and substantially improves reasoning faithfulness in dedicated evaluations.

Abstract:
Cloud-hosted Large Language Models (LLMs) offer unmatched reasoning capabilities and dynamic knowledge, yet submitting raw queries to these external services risks exposing sensitive user intent. Conversely, relying exclusively on trusted local models preserves privacy but often compromises answer quality due to limited parameter scale and knowledge. To resolve this dilemma, we propose Game-theoretic Trustworthy Knowledge Acquisition (GTKA), a framework that formulates the trade-off between knowledge utility and privacy as a strategic game. GTKA consists of three components: (i) a privacy-aware sub-query generator that decomposes sensitive intent into generalized, low-risk fragments; (ii) an adversarial reconstruction attacker that attempts to infer the original query from these fragments, providing adaptive leakage signals; and (iii) a trusted local integrator that synthesizes external responses within a secure boundary. By training the generator and attacker in an alternating adversarial manner, GTKA optimizes the sub-query generation policy to maximize knowledge acquisition accuracy while minimizing the reconstructability of the original sensitive intent. To validate our approach, we construct two sensitive-domain benchmarks in the biomedical and legal fields. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GTKA significantly reduces intent leakage compared to state-of-the-art baselines while maintaining high-fidelity answer quality.

Abstract:
Recent works on large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the impact of prompting strategies and fine-tuning techniques on their reasoning capabilities. Yet, their effectiveness on clinical natural language inference (CTNLI) remains underexplored. This study presents the first controlled evaluation of how prompt structure and efficient fine-tuning jointly shape model performance in CTNLI.We inspect four classes of prompting strategies to elicit reasoning in LLMs at different levels of abstraction, and evaluate their impact on a range of clinically motivated reasoning types. For each prompting strategy, we construct high-quality demonstrations using a frontier model to distil multi-step reasoning capabilities into smaller models (≤ 4B parameters) via Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). Across different LLMs fine-tuned on the NLI4CT benchmark, we found that prompt type alone accounts for up to 44% of the variance in macro-F1. Moreover, LoRA fine-tuning yields consistent gains of +8 to 12 F1, raises output alignment above 97%, and narrows the performance gap to GPT-4o-mini to within 7.1%. Additional experiments on reasoning generalisation reveal that LoRA improves performance in 75% of the models on MedNLI and TREC Clinical Trials.Overall, these findings demonstrate that (i) prompt structure is a primary driver of clinical NLI reasoning performance, (ii) compact models equipped with strong prompts and LoRA can rival frontier-scale systems, and (iii) reasoning-type-aware evaluation is essential to uncover prompt-induced trade-offs. Our results highlight the promise of combining prompt design and lightweight adaptation for more efficient and trustworthy clinical NLP systems, providing insights on the strengths and limitations of widely adopted prompting and parameter-efficient techniques in specialised domains. All code, annotations, prompts, demonstrations, and checkpoints will be released upon publication.

Abstract:
Despite significant progress in video-language modeling, hallucinations remain a persistent challenge in Video Large Language Models (Vid-LLMs), referring to outputs that appear plausible yet contradict the content of the input video. This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of hallucinations in Vid-LLMs and introduces a systematic taxonomy that categorizes them into two core types: dynamic distortion and content fabrication, each comprising two subtypes with representative cases. Building on this taxonomy, we review recent advances in the evaluation and mitigation of hallucinations, covering key benchmarks, metrics, and intervention strategies. We further analyze the root causes of dynamic distortion and content fabrication, which often result from limited capacity for temporal representation and insufficient visual grounding. These insights inform several promising directions for future work, including the development of motion-aware visual encoders and the integration of counterfactual learning techniques. This survey consolidates scattered progress to foster a systematic understanding of hallucinations in Vid-LLMs, laying the groundwork for building robust and reliable video-language systems.

Abstract:
Explicit grammar teaching is central to endangered-language revitalization, but creating grammar lessons is labor-intensive and often falls to already overburdened teachers. We present HYGRAM, a hybrid grammar-induction method that combines typological priors, Bayesian inference, constrained LLM reasoning, and retrieval from sparse corpora and descriptive documents to generate topic-specific grammar lessons for classroom use. HYGRAM targets extremely low-resource settings and can operate from a small elicited corpus collected in roughly 10 hours of fieldwork together with any available reference materials. We evaluate the system on six typologically diverse endangered languages using expert linguist judgments of output content quality, pedagogical adequacy, and consistency across generated lessons. Results indicate that HYGRAM can produce coherent and practically useful lessons, with better quality when modest explanatory evidence is available. Feedback from Pacific language communities further suggests relevance for ongoing revitalization efforts. Overall, the work shows that evidence-constrained hybrid grammar induction can support grammar teaching and documentation where standard NLP pipelines are infeasible.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) show strong reasoning and decision-making ability, but their high inference cost motivates transferring agentic skills to small language models (SLMs). Agent distillation trains SLMs on full reason–act–observe trajectories from a tool-using teacher, enabling SLMs to acquire the tool-use capabilities of large teacher models. However, some teacher-agent trajectories are simply hard for the student to learn, and their compatibility with the student can vary widely; moreover, a uniform token-level loss prevents SLMs from learning the tool-use patterns and final decisions that truly drive successful reasoning. Therefore, we propose SmartAD, a capacity-aligned agent distillation framework that improves both the distilled data and the supervision signal. SmartAD (i) selects, for each training example, the trajectory with the minimum negative log-likelihood among multiple correct teacher samples to obtain student-friendly training data, and (ii) applies a segment-weighted loss that emphasizes action execution and final decision spans over intermediate reasoning. Experiments on multi-hop QA and math benchmarks with 1.5B and 3B models show that SmartAD consistently outperforms all baselines. Overall, our method enables small models to learn the teacher’s capabilities more easily and efficiently through trajectory selection and segment-weighted supervision, achieving capacity-aligned distillation.

Abstract:
Tiny Recursive Models (TRMs) perform iterative reasoning with an Adaptive Computation Time (ACT)-style loop, but their supervised training targets can be brittle, and their halting behavior can be difficult to tune. We introduce TRM-Planner, a two-stage teacher-cache distillation recipe that shifts compute to an offline teacher-cache stage. A frozen TRM checkpoint is unrolled for multiple refinement steps and stochastic rollouts; for each instance, we cache a small set of teacher entries (tokens, logits, step index, and quality metadata). A student TRM is then trained with the standard TRM objective plus a distillation loss computed from cached entries. Across Sudoku-Extreme and ARC-AGI-1/2, TRM-Planner shows an improvement over our reproduced TRM baseline while leaving student-time inference unchanged. On ARC1/ARC2 with 7M parameters, the two-attempt accuracy (pass@2) increases from 43.1% to 48.1% and 6.7% to 9.2%, respectively.

Abstract:
Real-world multi-hop QA is naturally linked with ambiguity, where a single query can trigger multiple reasoning paths that require independent resolution. Since ambiguity can occur at any stage, models must navigate layered uncertainty throughout the entire reasoning chain. Despite its prevalence in real-world user queries, previous benchmarks have primarily focused on single-hop ambiguity, leaving the complex interaction between multi-step inference and layered ambiguity underexplored. In this paper, we introduce MARCH, a benchmark for their intersection, with 2,209 multi-hop ambiguous questions curated via multi-LLM verification and validated by human annotation with strong agreement. Our experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art models struggle with MARCH, confirming that combining ambiguity resolution with multi-step reasoning is a significant challenge. To address this, we propose CLARION, a two-stage agentic framework that explicitly decouples ambiguity planning from evidence-driven reasoning, significantly outperforms existing approaches, and paves the way for robust reasoning systems.

Abstract:
Multi-party dialogue discourse parsing aims to identify dependency structures and relation types between utterances in conversations. Previous studies are mostly limited to textual modality or two-party dialogue, failing to meet the multimodal and multi-party settings. In this paper, we construct the first publicly available English multimodal dataset DraDDP for multi-party dialogue discourse parsing, based on American TV dramas. DraDDP contains 495 dialogue segments with 6,374 utterances and 9.1 hours of parallel video content, covering rich multi-party interaction scenarios. Moreover, we establish comprehensive benchmarks by evaluating this task on DraDDP and conducting in-depth analysis on the impact of different modalities. Experimental results demonstrate the value of multimodal information in capturing dialogue structures and relation types. We will publicly release the dataset, annotation guidelines, and code to promote future research in multimodal dialogue understanding.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often suffer from the “over-thinking” problem, generating unnecessarily long reasoning on simple tasks. Some strategies have been proposed to mitigate this issue, such as length penalties or routing mechanisms, but they are typically heuristic and task-specific, lacking a general framework for adaptive reasoning. In this paper, we present ARM2, a unified model that adaptively balances reasoning performance and efficiency across multiple formats through a reinforcement learning framework augmented with length-aware optimization. Beyond conventional natural language inference, ARM2 integrates vision understanding, extending its applicability to multimodal. Moreover, ARM2 integrates executable code into reasoning, enabling substantial reductions in token cost while preserving task performance compared to long CoT. Experiments demonstrate that ARM2 achieves performance on par with traditional reasoning models trained with GRPO, while reducing token usage by over 70% on average. We further conduct extensive analyses to validate the effectiveness of ARM2 and the soundness of its design.

Abstract:
Nonverbal vocalizations (NVs), such as laughter and sighs, are central to the expression of affective cues in emotional speech synthesis. However, learning diverse and contextually aligned NVs remains challenging in open settings due to limited NV data and the lack of explicit supervision. Motivated by this challenge, we propose Affectron as a framework for affective and contextually aligned NV generation. Built on a small-scale open and decoupled corpus, Affectron introduces an NV-augmented training strategy that expands the distribution of NV types and insertion locations. We further incorporate NV structural masking into a speech backbone pre-trained on purely verbal speech to enable diverse and natural NV synthesis. Experimental results demonstrate that Affectron produces more expressive and diverse NVs than baseline systems while preserving the naturalness of the verbal speech stream.

Abstract:
Advances in mechanistic interpretability have identified special attention heads, known as retrieval heads, that are responsible for retrieving information from the context. However, the role of these retrieval heads in improving model performance remains unexplored. This work investigates whether retrieval heads can be leveraged to enhance the long-context capabilities of LLMs. Specifically, we propose RetMask, a method that generates training signals by contrasting normal model outputs with those from an ablated variant in which the retrieval heads are masked. This mechanism-based approach achieves substantial improvements: +2.28 points on HELMET at 128K for Llama-3.1, with +70% gains on generation with citation and +32% on passage re-ranking, while preserving performance on general tasks. Experiments across three model families demonstrate that RetMask consistently improves long-context performance, with gains correlating with the sparsity of the retrieval score distribution: models with sparser distributions, where retrieval capabilities are concentrated in a small set of heads, respond more strongly, while those with less sparse distributions show more modest gains. These results validate the functional role of retrieval heads and show that mechanistic insights can be transformed into performance enhancements.

Abstract:
Real-world scenarios involve massive heterogeneous structured data (e.g., tables, knowledge graphs), making effective reasoning over such diverse data increasingly important. Unified structured data question answering has emerged as a prominent research trend, aiming to answer natural language questions across different structured data types within a single framework. However, existing unified methods share a common limitation: they rely on a set of predefined functions, which restricts their ability to perform complex reasoning beyond these predefined operations. To overcome this fundamental limitation, we propose CRAFTQA , a novel adaptive code-driven framework comprising two core modules, CodeSTEP and CRAFT. The CodeSTEP module is a paradigm that generates a complete executable Python code sequence, which contains step-by-step code-based reasoning operations based on the question.The CRAFT module dynamically generates custom code functions for operations beyond the predefined function set, and seamlessly integrates with CodeSTEP to significantly enhance flexibility in handling complex reasoning. Comprehensive experiments on multiple structured datasets demonstrate that CRAFTQA achieves remarkable improvements in complex reasoning scenarios compared to existing unified methods.

Abstract:
Evaluating the exhaustive search capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is plagued by a fundamental paradox: verifying completeness requires complete ground truth, yet high-entropy enumeration tasks make such ground truth impossible for humans to create. This causes benchmarks to systematically penalize models for outperforming their human annotators. Despite rapid progress in web-search and deep research agents—which now issue hundreds of queries, traverse diverse sites, and synthesize long reports—evaluation still largely relies on partially annotated answer sets, LLM-based judges, or single-answer questions that avoid genuinely exhaustive search scenarios.We break this paradox by shifting the evaluation paradigm from simulating a messy reality to constructing computationally pure challenges. We introduce VERITAS (Verifiable Traversal Assessment for Search), a framework built on the principle of computationally irreducible constraints. By introducing novel, non-optimizable constraints, we create verifiable, sparse-answer search tasks that are computationally equivalent to exhaustive enumeration. These constraints are easy to verify but impossible for LLMs or search engines to optimize, forcing agents to genuinely traverse the entire search space. VERITAS can automatically generate a virtually infinite number of test cases with perfect ground truth and precise difficulty control, with marginal instance cost dominated by hash computations. This provides not only a robust benchmark for evaluating systematic exploration under uncertainty but also a scalable method for generating training data to improve these crucial, yet underdeveloped, capabilities.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success on reasoning benchmarks through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), excelling at tasks such as math, coding, logic and puzzles. However, existing benchmarks evaluate only correctness, overlooking optimality—the ability to find the best solutions under constraints. We propose , the first comprehensive framework for training and evaluating LLMs on NP-hard optimization problems through quality-aware RLVR. provides three key components: a scalable training infrastructure with instance generators, quality verifiers, and optimal baselines across 10 tasks; a rigorous benchmark with 1,000 instances evaluating both feasibility (Success Rate) and quality (Quality Ratio); and quality-aware rewards enabling continuous improvement beyond binary correctness. Training on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-1M with 15K examples achieves 93.1% SR and 46.6% QR, significantly outperforming GPT-4o (29.6% SR, 14.6% QR). Beyond optimization, training on transfers to diverse tasks: mathematics (+2.2%), logic (+1.2%), knowledge (+4.1%), and instruction-following (+6.1%). Our analysis reveals quality-aware rewards improve solutions by 28.8% over binary rewards, and task diversity drives generalization more than data quantity—offering insights into RLVR scaling for complex reasoning.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated strong capabilities in understanding and generating responses from diverse visual inputs, including high-resolution images and long video sequences. As these models scale to richer visual representations, inference increasingly relies on storing large numbers of vision tokens in the key–value (KV) cache, making memory consumption a central bottleneck. Existing methods address this issue by identifying redundancy in vision tokens and compressing the cache, but such compression is typically applied only after all inputs are processed, resulting in high peak memory usage during the prefill stage. In this work, we show that MLLMs exhibit inherent structural regularities and representational redundancy that can be exploited to control memory growth throughout inference. Based on this insight, we propose a sequential input-compression mechanism that enforces a fixed memory budget by performing structure-aware key–value cache compression during the prefill process. This approach substantially reduces peak memory usage while maintaining generative performance with only minimal degradation, enabling more practical and memory-efficient multimodal inference.

Abstract:
Bacteriophages, often referred to as the dark matter of the biosphere, play a critical role in regulating microbial ecosystems and in antibiotic alternatives. Thus, accurate interpretation of their genomes holds significant scientific and practical value. While general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at understanding biological texts, their ability to directly interpret raw nucleotide sequences and perform biological reasoning remains underexplored. To address this, we introduce PhageBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate phage genome understanding by mirroring the workflow of bioinformatics experts. The dataset contains 5,600 high-quality samples covering five core tasks across three stages: Screening, Quality Control, and Phenotype Annotation. Our evaluation of eight LLMs reveals that general-purpose reasoning models significantly outperform random baselines in phage contig identification and host prediction, demonstrating promising potential for genomic understanding. However, they exhibit significant limitations in complex reasoning tasks involving long-range dependencies and fine-grained functional localization. These findings highlight the necessity of developing next-generation models with enhanced reasoning capabilities for biological sequences.

Authors: Usman Naseem, Robert Geislinger, Juan Ren, Sarah Kohail, Rudy Alexandro Garrido Veliz, P Sam Sahil, Yiran Zhang, Idris Abdulmumin, Marco Antonio Stranisci, Özge Alacam, Cengiz Acarturk, Aisha Jabr, Saba Anwar, Abinew Ali Ayele, Simona Frenda, Alessandra Teresa Cignarella, Elena Tutubalina, Oleg Rogov, Aung Kyaw Htet, Xintong Wang, Surendrabikram Thapa, Kritesh Rauniyar, Tanmoy Chakraborty, MD Arfeen Zeeshan, Dheeraj Kodati, Satya Keerthi, Sahar Moradizeyveh, Firoj Alam, Md Arid Hasan, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Ye Kyaw Thu, Shantipriya Parida, Ihsan Ayyub Qazi, Lilian Diana Awuor Wanzare, Nelson Odhiambo Onyango, Clemencia Siro, Jane Wanjiru Kimani, Ibrahim Said Ahmad, Adem Chanie Ali, Martin Semmann, Chris Biemann, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Seid Muhie Yimam

Abstract:
Online polarization poses a growing challenge for democratic discourse, yet most computational social science research remains monolingual, culturally narrow, or event-specific. We introduce POLAR, a multilingual, multicultural, and multi-event dataset with over 110K instances in 22 languages drawn from diverse online platforms and real-world events. Polarization is annotated along three axes, namely detection, type, and manifestation, using a variety of annotation platforms adapted to each cultural context. We conduct two main experiments: (1) fine-tuning six pretrained small language models; and (2) evaluating a range of open and closed large language models in few-shot and zero-shot settings. Results show that while most models perform well on binary polarization detection, they achieve substantially lower performance when predicting polarization types and manifestations. These findings highlight the complex, highly contextual nature of polarization and underscore the need for robust, adaptable approaches in NLP and computational social science. All resources will be released to support further research and effective mitigation of digital polarization globally.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) frequently suffers from mode collapse due to the inherent sparsity of feedback signals. While strategies such as entropy regularization introduce randomness, they lack directionality. Simply incorporating diversity rewards is overly one-sided and fails to identify potential logical errors or hallucinations. To address these limitations, we propose VANE (Value-Aligned Novelty Exploration), a method that simultaneously quantifies novelty across the outcome space (via reward or solution divergence) and the semantic process space (via semantic process divergence). Moreover, VANE employs a value-alignment mechanism that symmetrically amplifies scarce, high-quality solutions while explicitly penalizing diverse yet erroneous reasoning paths. Extensive experiments on models such as Qwen2.5-Math-7B across eight benchmarks—encompassing both large-scale mathematical reasoning and out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks—demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of the proposed method.

Abstract:
Customer service chatbots are increasingly expected to serve not merely as reactive support tools for users, but as strategic interfaces for harvesting high-value information and business intelligence. In response, we make three main contributions. 1) We introduce and define a novel task of Proactive Information Probing, which optimizes when to probe users for pre-specified target information while minimizing conversation turns and user friction. 2) We propose PROCHATIP, a proactive chatbot framework featuring a specialized conversation strategy module trained to master the delicate timing of probes. 3) Experiments demonstrate that PROCHATIP significantly outperforms baselines, exhibiting superior capability in both information probing and service quality. We believe that our work effectively redefines the commercial utility of chatbots, positioning them as scalable, cost-effective engines for proactive business intelligence. Our code is available at https://github.com/SCUNLP/PROCHATIP.

Abstract:
Multimodal summarization requires models to jointly understand textual and visual inputs to generate concise, semantically coherent summaries. Existing methods often inject shallow visual features into deep language models, leading to representational mismatches and weak cross-modal grounding. We propose a unified framework that jointly performs text summarization and representative image selection. Our system, SPeCTrA-Sum (Sampler Perceiver with Cross-modal Transformer and gated Attention for Summarization), introduces two key innovations. First, a Deep Visual Processor (DVP) aligns the visual encoder with the language model at corresponding depths, enabling hierarchical, layer-wise fusion that preserves semantic consistency. Second, a lightweight Visual Relevance Predictor (VRP) selects salient and diverse images by distilling soft labels from a Determinantal Point Process (DPP) teacher. SPeCTrA-Sum is trained using a multi-objective loss that combines autoregressive summarization, cross-modal alignment, and DPP-based distillation. Experiments show that our system produces more accurate, visually grounded summaries and selects more representative images, demonstrating the benefits of depth-aware fusion and principled image selection for multimodal summarization.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely explored for embedding generation. While recent studies show that in-context learning (ICL) effectively enhances the representational capability of LLMs by prepending a few task-related demonstrations, it causes substantial token overhead due to the increased sequence length. In this work, we propose EPIC, a novel embedding-based in-context prompt training strategy that leverages ICL to generate high-quality embeddings while reducing computational burden during both training and inference. This approach replaces discrete text demonstrations with their corresponding continuous embeddings, which not only encourages the LLM to align semantically-related text pairs during contrastive learning, but also requires the model to interpret demonstration embeddings as part of the in-context prompt. Consequently, EPIC-trained models achieve excellent embedding performance both with or without in-context prompts at inference time. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that our method establishes new state-of-the-art results on the MTEB benchmark, surpassing frontier models trained solely on publicly available retrieval data. Extensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness and necessity of our mechanism.

Abstract:
Evaluating semantic drift is essential for understanding dynamical discourse evolution and opinion formation in online discussions. However, sparse and uneven distributions of event-specific keywords prevent traditional models from capturing post-level semantic drift. Thus, to address this issue, we propose an LLM-embedding Semantic Adaptation Network (LLM-SAN), which is a hybrid semantic drift evaluation model with an LLM-Embedding gated recurrent unit (GRU) module, an LLM-Embedding graph convolutional network (GCN) module and a multi-expert adaptive fusion module. The GRU module is used to extract features from event related posts, and The GCN is used to extract features from temporal graphical topic posts. Then, the features are merged by the multi-expert adaptive fusion module. Finally, this module predicts the future post embedding, and the prediction error is used to evaluate and detect the semantic drift points. Extensive experiments are conducted, and the results show that LLM-SAN achieves the state-of-the-art performance on the semantic drift evaluation task, compared to the other baselines. Ablation experiments are also conducted to show the effectiveness of each module in LLM-SAN.

Abstract:
Recent work shows that large multimodal models (LMMs) can self-improve from unlabeled data via self-play and intrinsic feedback. Yet existing self-evolving frameworks mainly reward final outcomes, leaving intermediate reasoning weakly constrained despite its importance for visually grounded decision making. We propose IREASONER, a self-evolving framework that improves an LMM’s implicit reasoning by explicitly eliciting chain-of-thought (CoT) and rewarding its internal agreement. In a Proposer–Solver loop over unlabeled images, IREASONER augments outcome-level intrinsic rewards with a trajectory-aware signal defined over intermediate reasoning steps, providing learning signals that distinguish reasoning paths leading to the same answer without ground-truth labels or external judges. Starting from Qwen2.5-VL-7B, IREASONER yields up to +2.1 points across diverse multimodal reasoning benchmarks under fully unsupervised post-training. We hope this work serves as a starting point for reasoning-aware self-improvement in LMMs in purely unsupervised settings.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has improved reasoning in language models, but it typically relies on a ground-truth answer or an external verifier, which limits applicability and increases cost. We propose an answer-free training objective that derives rewards solely from the model’s own probabilities by exploiting prompt paraphrases as multiple semantic views of the same intent. For each paraphrase set, we generate candidate responses, rescore each response under the other paraphrased prompts via teacher forcing, and define a cross-prompt consensus reward that serves as a practical internal training signal, favoring responses supported across views rather than those that fit only a single phrasing. We optimize this reward using a policy update with an all-pairs objective and advantage broadcasting across prompt–response pairs. The framework naturally supports prefix-level training, enabling a controllable cost–signal trade-off. Experiments on RobustAlpacaEval and out-of-domain reasoning benchmarks (OpenBookQA, AQuA, HumanEval) show strong in-domain gains and competitive or improved average out-of-domain performance over pre-trained and answer-free training baselines on LLaMA3.2-3B and Qwen3-4B, alongside analyses demonstrating reward–performance alignment and the importance of design choices such as excluding self-view scores and ensembling-based candidates. All experiment code is available at our GitHub.

Abstract:
The increasing misuse of AI-generated texts (AIGT) has motivated the rapid development of AIGT detection methods. However, the reliability of these detectors remains fragile against adversarial evasions. Existing attack strategies often rely on white-box assumptions or demand prohibitively high computational and interaction costs, rendering them ineffective under practical black-box scenarios. In this paper, we propose Multi-stage Alignment for Style Humanization (MASH), a novel framework that evades black-box detectors based on style transfer. MASH sequentially employs style-injection supervised fine-tuning, direct preference optimization, and inference-time refinement to shape the distributions of AI-generated texts to resemble those of human-written texts. Experiments across 6 datasets and 5 detectors demonstrate the superior performance of MASH over 11 baseline evaders. Specifically, MASH achieves an average Attack Success Rate (ASR) of 92%, surpassing the strongest baselines by an average of 24%, while maintaining superior linguistic quality.

Abstract:
Navigating biopharmaceutical intellectual property necessitates precisely associating visual chemical structures with their textual referents across lengthy documents. Despite its critical role in drug discovery, this multimodal coreference task remains underexplored. It presents unique challenges, including handling Markush structures and distinguishing the atom-level differences between adjacent structures. To bridge this gap, we define the multimodal Chemical Structure-Text coreference and introduce CheST, the first dataset explicitly designed for the task. Furthermore, to satisfy the strict logical consistency in the task, we propose RULER, a RULE-guided multimodal Reinforcement learning framework built upon an SFT cold start. RULER utilizes rule-driven reward functions operationalizing multidimensional consistencies, acting as a domain-specific "verifier" to obtain the correct domain knowledge. Experimental results demonstrate that RULER achieves a 40% improvement over the strongest baseline–Gemini-2.5-Pro, demonstrating the superior efficacy.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on formal language tasks, yet whether this reflects genuine symbolic reasoning or pattern matching on familiar constructions remains unclear. We introduce a benchmark for deterministic finite automata (DFA) construction from regular languages, comprising factual knowledge questions, seen construction problems from public sources, and two types of unseen problems: hand-crafted instances with multiple interacting constraints and systematically generated problems via Arden’s theorem. Models achieve perfect accuracy on factual questions and 84-90% on seen tasks. However, accuracy drops sharply on unseen problems (by 30-64%), with failures stemming from systematic misinterpretation of language constraints, incorrect handling of Kleene-star semantics, and a failure to preserve global consistency. We evaluate a three-stage hint protocol that enables correction of shallow errors but does not reliably resolve globally inconsistent or structurally flawed automata. Our analysis across multiple prompting strategies (direct, Chain-of-Thought, Tree-of-Thought) reveals that errors persist regardless of prompting approach, exposing a fundamental gap between LLMs’ ability to generate syntactically plausible DFAs and their capacity for semantically correct formal reasoning.

Abstract:
Pretrained language models (PLMs) like BERT provide strong semantic representations but are costly and opaque, while symbolic models such as the Tsetlin Machine (TM) offer transparency but lack semantic generalization. We propose a semantic bootstrapping framework that transfers LLM knowledge into symbolic form, combining interpretability with semantic capacity. Given a class label, an LLM generates sub-intents that guide synthetic data creation through a three-stage curriculum (seed, core, enriched), expanding semantic diversity. A Non-Negated TM (NTM) learns from these examples to extract high-confidence literals as interpretable semantic cues. Injecting these cues into real data enables a TM to align clause logic with LLM-inferred semantics. Our method requires no embeddings or runtime LLM calls, yet equips symbolic models with pretrained semantic priors. Across multiple text classification tasks, it improves interpretability and accuracy over vanilla TM, achieving performance comparable to BERT while remaining fully symbolic and efficient.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to cultural heritage materials, from digital archives to educational platforms. This work identifies a fundamental issue in how these models interpret historical artifacts. We define this phenomenon as cultural anachronism, the tendency to misinterpret historical objects using temporally inappropriate concepts, materials, or cultural frameworks. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the Temporal Anachronism Benchmark for Vision-Language Models TAB-VLM, a dataset of 600 questions across six categories, designed to evaluate temporal reasoning on 1,600 Indian cultural artifacts spanning prehistoric to modern periods. Systematic evaluations of ten state-of-the-art models reveal significant deficiencies on our benchmark, and even the best model (GPT-5.2) achieves only 58.7% overall accuracy. The performance gap persists across varying architectures and scales, suggesting that cultural anachronism represents a significant limitation in visual AI systems, regardless of model size. These findings highlight the disparity between current VLM capabilities and the requirements for accurately interpreting cultural heritage materials, particularly for non-Western visual cultures underrepresented in training data. Our benchmark provides a foundation for enhancing temporal cognition in multimodal AI systems that interact with historical artifacts. The dataset and code are available in the supplementary material.

Abstract:
Existing cross-modal image-text retrieval models often retrieve samples with inconsistent details. To evaluate fine-grained discriminability, we introduce MSCOCO-CCD and Flickr30k-CCD, with three key features: (1) a two-level image content taxonomy for contrastive sample generation and fine-grained evaluation; (2) annotation of numerous contrastive samples, where each sample differs from the anchor by a controlled contrastive difference (CCD), with the specific type of difference labeled; (3) a fine-grained contrastive discrimination metric to assess the ability to distinguish fine-grained nuances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that contrastive samples can significantly degrade retrieval performance. Furthermore, fine-grained evaluation reveals that current models still struggle to effectively produce discriminative representations on certain feature types, such as entity emotion and scene attribute. Our datasets and related codes will be publicly released.

Abstract:
To reduce memory consumption during LLM inference, a handful of methods have been proposed for KV cache pruning.While these techniques can accomplish lossless memory reduction on many datasets, they often hinge on an under-emphasized condition: an input/domain-specific threshold for KV cache budget needs to be pre-determined to achieve the optimal performance.However, such input-sensitive design may be considerably limited in real-world scenarios, as open-domain inputs span diverse domains, lengths and difficulty levels, without clear boundaries for threshold selection.As a result, the dependence of such input-sensitive threshold can be a fundamental limitation that causes large degradation on arbitrary inputs.In this work, we propose a new objective that lifts the threshold constraints for robust KV compression, advocating for "threshold-free" methods that adaptively adjust budget allocation while preserving full-cache performance.We then propose a novel method, ReFreeKV, serving as the first instantiation of this objective. Extensive experiments across 13 datasets with diverse context lengths, task types, and model sizes demonstrate its efficacy and efficiency. Our code is publicly released at https://github.com/Patrick-Ni/ReFreeKV.

Abstract:
With the rapid advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), their potential has gained significant attention in Chinese Classical Studies (CCS). While existing research primarily focuses on text and visual modalities, the audio corpus within this domain remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Multi-task Classical Chinese Literary Genre Audio Corpus (MCGA), a 119-hour corpus comprising 22,000 audio samples. It encompasses a diverse range of literary genres across six tasks: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), Speech-to-Text Translation (S2TT), Speech Emotion Captioning (SEC), Spoken Question Answering (SQA), Speech Understanding (SU), and Speech Reasoning (SR). Through the evaluation of ten MLLMs, our experimental results demonstrate that current MLLMs still face substantial challenges on the MCGA test set. Furthermore, we introduce a domain-specific metric for SEC and a metric to measure the consistency between speech and text capabilities. We release MCGA to the public to facilitate the development of more robust MLLMs. MCGA Corpus: https://github.com/yxduir/MCGA

Abstract:
Speech fluency is a core indicator of second language proficiency and a critical component of Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Training (CAPT) systems. Accurate assessment requires models to perceive both macroscopic speech flow trends and microscopic local anomalies. However, existing methods struggle to bridge the semantic gap between static expert priors and dynamic temporal representations, while often overlooking the inherent ordinal nature of fluency scores. To address these challenges, we first construct a set of expert features targeting fluency disruptions and rhythmic regularity to provide explicit linguistic priors. Building on this, we propose the Multimodal Multi-Stream Fusion Classification (MMSFC) network. It employs a Mutual Cross-Attention (MCA) mechanism that leverages these expert features as “semantic anchors” to actively guide Whisper’s temporal representations and integrate decoder contexts, achieving deep interaction between global priors and local dynamics. Furthermore, we propose the Ordinal Smoothed Cross-Entropy (OSCE) loss. By constructing distance-aware soft target distributions coupled with confidence-adaptive smoothing and boundary enhancement, OSCE explicitly models ordinal relationships to resolve boundary ambiguity. Experiments on SpeechOcean762 show MMSFC achieves 83.40% accuracy, significantly outperforming strong baselines. Notably, OSCE also demonstrates superior generalization potential in cross-domain CV and NLP tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/speech26ai/MMSFCCode .

Abstract:
Generating long sequences with structural coherence remains a fundamental challenge for autoregressive models across sequential generation tasks. In symbolic music generation, this challenge is particularly pronounced, as existing methods are constrained by the severe error accumulation inherent in autoregressive models, leading to poor performance in music quality and structural integrity. In this paper, we propose the Anchored Cyclic Generation (ACG) paradigm, which relies on anchor features from previously generated musical content to guide subsequent generation during the autoregressive process, effectively mitigating error accumulation in autoregressive methods. Based on the ACG paradigm, we further propose the Hierarchical Anchored Cyclic Generation (Hi-ACG) framework, which employs a systematic global-to-local generation strategy and is highly compatible with our specifically designed piano token, an efficient musical representation. The experimental results demonstrate that compared to traditional autoregressive models, the ACG paradigm reduces cosine distance by an average of 34.7% between predicted feature vectors and ground-truth semantic vectors. In long-sequence symbolic music generation tasks, the Hi-ACG framework significantly outperforms existing mainstream methods in both subjective and objective evaluations. Furthermore, the framework exhibits excellent task generalization capabilities, achieving superior performance in related tasks such as music completion.

Abstract:
We introduce a self-play framework for semantic equivalence in Haskell, utilizing formal verification to guide adversarial training between a generator and an evaluator. The framework leverages Liquid Haskell proofs for validating equivalence and execution-based counterexamples for inequivalence, organized via a difficulty-aware curriculum. To facilitate this, we release OpInstruct-HSx, a synthetic dataset of ≈ 28k validated Haskell programs. Empirical experiments show that our evaluator transfers effectively to downstream tasks, achieving up to 13.3pp accuracy gain on EquiBench and consistent gains on PySecDB. Ablation studies on the SEQ-SINQ regimes indicate that while inequivalence supervision provides data volume, equivalence proofs are uniquely responsible for the model’s reasoning capabilities. The entire training pipeline and dataset are publicly released on GitHub and Hugging Face respectively.

Abstract:
Ensuring Large Language Model (LLM) safety is crucial, yet the lack of a clear understanding about safety mechanisms hinders the development of precise and reliable methodologies for safety intervention across diverse tasks. To better understand and control LLM safety, we propose the Expected Safety Impact (ESI) framework for quantifying how different parameters affect LLM safety. Based on ESI, we reveal distinct safety-critical patterns across different LLM architectures: In dense LLMs, many safety-critical parameters are located in value matrices (V) and MLPs in middle layers, whereas in Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, they shift to late-layer MLPs. Leveraging ESI, we further introduce two targeted intervention paradigms for safety enhancement and preservation, i.e., Safety Enhancement Tuning (SET) and Safety Preserving Adaptation (SPA). SET can align unsafe LLMs by updating only a few safety-critical parameters, effectively enhancing safety while preserving original performance. SPA safeguards well-aligned LLMs during capability-oriented intervention (e.g., instruction tuning) by preventing disruption of safety-critical weights, allowing the LLM to acquire new abilities while maintaining safety capabilities. Extensive evaluations on different LLMs demonstrate that SET can reduce the attack success rates of unaligned LLMs by over 50% with only a 100-iteration update on 1% of model weights. SPA can limit the safety degradation of aligned LLMs within 1% after a 1,000-iteration instruction fine-tuning on different tasks. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ZJU-LLM-Safety/SafeWeights-ACL

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often encode word-form variation (e.g., walk vs. walked) as linear directions in the embedding space. However, standard tokenization algorithms treat such variants as distinct words with different vocabulary entries—quickly filling the size-capped token vocabulary with surface-form variation (e.g., walk, walking, Walk), at the expense of diversity and multilingual coverage. We show that many of these variations can be captured by transformation vectors—additive offsets that yield the appropriate word representation when applied to a base form embedding, in both the input and output spaces. Building on this, we propose a compact reshaping of the vocabulary: instead of assigning unique tokens to each surface form, we compose them from shared base form and transformation vectors (e.g., walked is walk+past tense). Our approach is lightweight—keeping the pretrained backbone frozen and only training small adaptation modules. We apply it across five languages and multiple LLMs in both pretraining and post-hoc adaptation, freeing 10-40% of vocabulary slots to be reallocated where tokenization is inefficient. Importantly, we do so while also expanding vocabulary coverage to out-of-vocabulary words, and with minimal impact on downstream performance. Our findings motivate a rethinking of vocabulary design, towards a representation that better matches the underlying structure of language and the practical needs of multilingual coverage.

Abstract:
Despite recent progress in diffusion and conditional flow matching (CFM) models for low-resolution domains such as latent representations, their application to high-resolution data like raw waveform signals remains underexplored. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been the dominant approach in neural vocoder and neural audio codecs for realistic waveform generation. However, under low-bitrate conditions, these models suffer from degraded performance due to information loss caused by heavy compression and quantization, often resulting in mispronunciations. To address the aforementioned problem, we first leverage CFM to iteratively generate raw waveform in an extremely low-bitrate scenario. We then introduce hierarchical representation alignment learning (REPA-H) to enable efficient and robust CFM training. Furthermore, we propose dense vector quantization (DVQ), a novel factorized quantization method using a single quantizer. Our model, FlowTokenizer, outperforms state-of-the-art neural audio codecs in audio quality and semantic intelligibility under low-bitrate conditions, using only 25 tokens per second for 24 kHz waveform generation.

Abstract:
Recent research has extensively explored the graph-reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through textual descriptions. However, benchmarks specifically designed for Graph-Language Models (GLMs), which integrate Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with LLMs, remain significantly underdeveloped. In this work, we first demonstrate that existing GLM evaluations, largely repurposed from unimodal node and edge level tasks, fail to assess true multimodal integration. Our analysis reveals that strong performance on these benchmarks is achievable using textual or structural features in isolation, bypassing the need for joint reasoning. To bridge this gap, we introduce CLEGR (Compositional Language-Graph Reasoning), a benchmark explicitly designed to evaluate multimodal reasoning over graph topology and textual semantics. Evaluation of representative GLMs on CLEGR shows that they exhibit significant performance degradation on CLEGR tasks and unimodal soft-prompted LLMs perform on par with complex multimodal GLMs. These findings collectively highlight limitations in the graph reasoning capabilities of existing GLMs and provide a foundation for advancing the community toward explicit multimodal reasoning involving graph structure and language.

Abstract:
Knowledge components (KCs) are key to assessing student knowledge levels on fine-grained skills and driving personalization and feedback. However, crafting KCs and tagging them for problems, traditionally performed by human domain experts, is highly labor-intensive. Prior work has studied automated KC generation only for multiple-choice questions but not open-ended ones. We bridge this gap and present an automated, large language model (LLM)-based pipeline for KC generation and tagging for open-ended programming problems. We also develop an LLM-based knowledge tracing (KT) framework to leverage these LLM-generated KCs. We conduct extensive quantitative and qualitative evaluations on two real-world student code submission datasets. Results show that our KT method outperforms existing ones and LLM-generated KCs outperform human-written KCs on future student response prediction. We also investigate how these KCs enable us to analyze student learning curves and conduct human evaluation with course instructors to further verify the quality of KC-problem tagging.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved table understanding tasks such as Table Question Answering (TableQA), yet challenges remain in ensuring reliability, scalability, and efficiency, especially in resource-constrained or privacy-sensitive environments. In this paper, we introduce MATA, a multi-agent TableQA framework that leverages multiple complementary reasoning paths and a set of tools built with small language models. MATA generates candidate answers through diverse reasoning styles for a given table and question, then refines or selects the optimal answer with the help of these tools. Furthermore, it incorporates an algorithm designed to minimize expensive LLM agent calls, enhancing overall efficiency. MATA maintains strong performance with small, open-source models and adapts easily across various LLM types. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks of varying difficulty with ten different LLMs demonstrate that MATA achieves state-of-the-art accuracy and highly efficient reasoning while avoiding excessive LLM inference. Our results highlight that careful orchestration of multiple reasoning pathways yields scalable and reliable TableQA. The code is available at https://github.com/AIDASLab/MATA.

Abstract:
Reward models trained through Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF) methods frequently suffer from limited generalizability, which hinders the alignment performance of policy models. This challenge stems from various issues, including distribution shift, preference label noise, and mismatch of overly challenging samples with model capacity. In this paper, we aim to enhance the generalizability of reward models through a data-centric approach, driven by the insight that these issues are inherently intertwined from a uniform perspective of data difficulty. Accordingly, we propose a novel framework, Curriculum-RLAIF, which constructs preference pairs with varying difficulty levels and then produces a specific curriculum for reward model training. Comprehensive experimental results suggest that reward models trained with Curriculum-RLAIF achieve improved generalizability, boosting the alignment performance of policy models by a significant margin without incurring additional inference costs compared to various existing non-curriculum baselines. Further analysis and comparison with alternative strategies highlight the superiority of Curriculum-RLAIF in simplicity, efficiency, and effectiveness.

Abstract:
In complex domains like interior design, user requests are often ambiguous and multimodal. Professional designers address this by asking strategic clarification questions based on hierarchical priorities, a capability lacking in current Vision-Language Models (VLMs). When fine-tuned on dialogue data, existing models often exhibit modality forgetting, overfitting to textual patterns while neglecting visual cues and thus producing hallucinated or visually irrelevant questions. To bridge this gap, we introduce VIDA (Visual Intent-driven Design Assistant), an assistant designed to generate proactive, visually grounded, and strategically prioritized clarification questions. Instead of standard fine-tuning, we propose a strategy-aware alignment framework that evolves from imitation learning to value-driven reinforcement. We utilize Group Sequence Policy Optimization to strictly enforce expert protocols, ensuring the model not only mimics fluent speech but also adheres to optimal inquiry strategies. Crucially, we design a novel hierarchical reward mechanism with Dynamic Intent Binding to align the assistant with professional prioritization standards. To facilitate this research, we construct and release InteriorClarify, a multimodal benchmark dataset comprising 1,016 real-world consultation cases annotated with this three-tier intent hierarchy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that VIDA sets a new state-of-the-art, improving the Strategic Alignment Score (SAS) by 20.59% over SFT baselines and effectively restoring visual grounding capabilities lost during standard fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Existing approaches to bias evaluation in large language models (LLMs) trade ecological validity for statistical control, relying on artificial prompts that poorly reflect real-world use, or on naturalistic tasks that lack scale and rigor. We introduce a scalable bias-auditing framework using named entities as probes to measure structural disparities in model behavior. We show that synthetic data reliably reproduces bias patterns observed in natural text, enabling large-scale analysis. Using this approach, we conduct the largest bias audit to date, comprising 1.9 billion data points across multiple entity types, tasks, languages, models, and prompting strategies. Our results reveal systematic biases: models penalize right-wing politicians, favor left-wing politicians, prefer Western and wealthy nations over the Global South, favor Western companies, and penalize firms in the defense and pharmaceutical sectors. While instruction tuning reduces bias, increasing model scale amplifies it, and prompting in Chinese or Russian does not attenuate Western-aligned preferences. These results indicate that LLMs should undergo rigorous auditing before deployment in high-stakes applications.

Abstract:
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved remarkable success in visual understanding, yet they struggle with knowledge-intensive queries involving long-tail entities or evolving information due to static parametric knowledge. Recent search-augmented approaches attempt to address this limitation, but existing methods rely on indiscriminate whole-image retrieval that introduces substantial visual redundancy and noise, and lack deep iterative reflection, limiting their effectiveness on complex visual queries. To overcome these challenges, we propose Glance-or-Gaze (GoG), a fully autonomous framework that shifts from passive perception to active visual planning. GoG introduces a Selective Gaze mechanism that dynamically chooses whether to glance at global context or gaze into high-value regions, filtering irrelevant information before retrieval. We design a dual-stage training strategy: Reflective GoG Behavior Alignment via supervised fine-tuning instills the fundamental GoG paradigm, while Complexity-Adaptive Reinforcement Learning further enhances the model’s capability to handle complex queries through iterative reasoning. Experiments across six benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance. Ablation studies confirm that both Selective Gaze and complexity-aware RL are essential for effective visual search. We will release our data and models for further exploration soon.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful foundational models to solve a variety of tasks, they have also been shown to be prone to hallucinations, i.e., generating responses that sound confident but are actually incorrect or even nonsensical. Existing hallucination detectors propose a wide range of empirical scoring rules, but their performance varies across models and datasets, and it is hard to determine which ones to rely on in practice or to treat as a reliable detector. In this work, we formulate the problem of detecting hallucinations as a hypothesis testing problem and draw parallels with the problem of out-of-distribution detection in machine learning models. We then propose a multiple-testing-inspired method that systematically aggregates multiple evaluation scores via conformal p-values, enabling calibrated detection with controlled false alarm rate. Extensive experiments across diverse models and datasets validate the robustness of our approach against state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Role-playing has garnered rising attention as it provides a strong foundation for human-machine interaction and facilitates sociological research. However, current work is confined to textual modalities, neglecting speech, which plays a predominant role in daily life, thus limiting genuine role-playing. To bridge this gap, we conceptualize and benchmark speech role-playing through ActorMindBench, and we present a corresponding reasoning framework, called ActorMind. Specifically, (1) Speech Role-Playing enables models to deliver spontaneous responses with personalized verbal traits based on their role, the scene, and spoken dialogue. (2) ActorMindBench is a hierarchical benchmark comprises Utterance-Level content with 7,653 utterances, Scene-Level content with 313 scenes, and Role-Level content with 6 roles. (3) ActorMind is an off-the-shelf, multi-agent, chain-of-though style reasoning framework that emulates how human actors perform in theaters. Concretely, ActorMind first reads its assigned role description via Eye Agent, then comprehends emotional cues within contextual spoken dialogues through Ear Agent. Subsequently, Brain Agent generates a descriptive emotional state, and finally, Mouth Agent delivers the scripts infused with corresponding emotion state. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of ActorMind in enhancing speech role-playing. The project page is available at https://github.com/OzymandiasChen/ActorMind.

Abstract:
While multimodal generative models have advanced radiology report generation (RRG), challenges remain in making reports accessible to patients and ensuring reliable evaluation. The technical language and templated nature of professional reports hinder patient comprehension and enable models to artificially boost lexical metrics such as BLEU by reproducing common report patterns. To address these limitations, we propose the Layman’s RRG framework, which leverages layperson-friendly language to enhance patient accessibility and promote more robust evaluation and report generation by encouraging models to focus on semantic accuracy over rigid templates. Our approach also introduces and releases two refined layman-style datasets (at the sentence and report levels), along with a semantics-based evaluation metric that mitigates inflated lexical scores and a layman-guided training strategy. Experiments show that training on layman-style data helps models better capture the meaning of clinical findings. Notably, we observe a positive scaling law: model performance improves with more layman-style data, in contrast to the inverse trend observed with templated professional language.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) provides external knowledge support for large language models (LLMs) in medical applications, but retrieved contexts often contain noisy or conflicting evidence that can degrade reasoning. We observe that when internal and external knowledge disagree, models systematically prefer external citations, inadvertently injecting retrieval noise. Our analyses further show that only a subset of retrieved citations consistently improves outcomes; these effective citations exhibit markedly lower token-level entropy, linking citation entropy to model accuracy. Building on these findings, we propose a complete pipeline consisting of a training-free multi-turn reasoning framework and a post-training methodology. The training-free framework elicits internal thought, external thought, and fusion thought, and applies conflict detection and explicit denoising for complex queries. For post-training, we distill structured supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data and apply GRPO with an entropy-based citation reward that encourages selective citation of beneficial external knowledge while penalizing noisy citations. Experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in noise-resistant medical reasoning, with larger improvements on harder cases.

Abstract:
In specialized domains that require expert annotators and high inter-annotator agreement, high-quality datasets with span-bound semantic concept annotations remain expensive to develop. Substantial resources are typically spent on unitizing , the task of identifying precise span boundaries for entity mentions. Unitizing is a significant source of inter-annotator disagreement, a poor use of expensive domain expertise, and very time-consuming. We propose a lighter annotation procedure that concentrates manual efforts on typed position annotations, marking positions in the text that overlap with mentions of each entity type, abstracting away span boundary decisions. With as few as 100-200 example sentences, we train span boundary detection models to unitize typed position annotations. Through evaluation over three datasets: CRAFT (biomedical), GENIA (molecular biology), and POLIANNA (climate/energy policy text), we demonstrate that (1) annotating typed positions in the text instead of full concept annotation is a more efficient use of time in low-resource settings, and (2) model-inferred span boundaries result in higher agreement at both the annotator training and corpus annotation phases, without sacrificing utility.

Abstract:
Despite demonstrating remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, large language models (LLMs) have also been found to frequently produce outputs that are incomplete or selectively omit key information. In sensitive domains, such omissions can result in significant harm comparable to that posed by factual inaccuracies, including hallucinations. In this study, we address the challenge of evaluating the comprehensiveness of LLM-generated texts, focusing on the detection of missing information or underrepresented viewpoints. We investigate three automated evaluation metrics: (1) an NLI-based method that decomposes texts into atomic statements and uses natural language inference (NLI) to identify missing facts, (2) a Q A-based metric that extracts question-answer pairs and compares responses across sources, and (3) an end-to-end approach that directly identifies missing content using LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate the surprising effectiveness of the simple end-to-end metric compared to more complex metrics, though at the cost of reduced robustness, interpretability and result granularity. We further assess the comprehensiveness of responses from several popular open-weight LLMs when answering user queries based on multiple sources.

Abstract:
Text revision is a core process in document creation, capturing how authors iteratively refine, reorganize, and improve written content. With the increasing availability of large-scale revision histories from platforms such as Wikipedia and arXiv, NLP research has begun to move beyond modeling what changes are made to understanding why they are made, i.e., the underlying edit intentions. To our knowledge, this is the first survey that synthesizes text revision research through the lens of edit intentions, providing a unified view of datasets, taxonomies, identification methods, and applications. We review prior work across the full revision workflow, including revision corpus construction, edit intention taxonomy design, and edit intention identification. We further categorize representative datasets and methods, summarize downstream applications such as writing assistance and document edit summarization, and highlight key open research directions.

Abstract:
Uncovering hidden symbolic laws from time series data, as an aspiration dating back to Kepler’s discovery of planetary motion, remains a core challenge in scientific discovery and artificial intelligence. While Large Language Models show promise in structured reasoning tasks, their ability to infer interpretable, context-aligned symbolic structures from time series data is still underexplored. To systematically evaluate this capability, we introduce SymbolBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to assess symbolic reasoning over real-world time series across three tasks: multivariate symbolic regression, Boolean network inference, and causal discovery. Unlike prior efforts limited to simple algebraic equations, SymbolBench spans a diverse set of symbolic forms with varying complexity. We further propose a unified framework that integrates LLMs with genetic programming to form a closed-loop symbolic reasoning system. Our empirical results reveal key strengths and limitations of current models, highlighting the importance of combining domain knowledge, context alignment, and reasoning structure to improve LLMs in automated scientific discovery.

Abstract:
Visual text compression is an emerging paradigm for rendering text as images for processing by vision-language models (VLMs), enabling higher information density per context token. However, the robustness of VLMs under dense, text-based visual inputs remains unevaluated. We introduce Fico, a benchmark designed to assess VLM robustness across seven controlled variants of visual fidelity and information density. Fico spans documents of 8k to 64k tokens and includes three tasks of increasing semantic granularity: optical character recognition (OCR), needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) retrieval, and visual question answering (VQA). Evaluating 13 general-purpose VLMs and 3 OCR-specialized models reveals three consistent trends: performance drops sharply under increased density or reduced resolution; cross-task transfer between OCR, NIAH, and VQA is limited; and VQA is comparatively robust because low-level details are lost before high-level semantics. By exposing failure modes that remain invisible under conventional VLM evaluations, Fico establishes a rigorous test-bed for visual text compression.

Abstract:
Caregivers seeking AI-mediated support express complex needs—information-seeking, emotional validation, and distress cues—that warrant careful evaluation of response safety and appropriateness. Existing AI evaluation frameworks, primarily focused on general risks (toxicity, hallucinations, policy violations, etc) may not adequately capture the nuanced risks of LLM-responses in caregiving-contexts. We introduce RubRIX (Rubric-based Risk Index), a theory-driven, clinician-validated framework for evaluating risks in LLM caregiving responses. Grounded in the Elements of an Ethic of Care, RubRIX operationalizes five empirically-derived risk dimensions: Inattention, Bias Stigma, Information Inaccuracy, Uncritical Affirmation, and Epistemic Arrogance. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs on over 20,000 caregiver queries from Reddit and ALZConnected. Rubric-guided refinement consistently reduced risk-components by 45-98% after one iteration across models. This work contributes a methodological approach for developing domain-sensitive, user-centered evaluation frameworks for high-burden contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of domain-sensitive, interactional risk evaluation for the responsible deployment of LLMs in caregiving support contexts. We release benchmark datasets to enable future research on contextual risk evaluation in AI-mediated support.

Abstract:
Recent Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong capabilities in audio understanding, yet their reasoning remains vulnerable to perceptual errors, especially in noisy and multi-speaker environments. We argue that reliable audio reasoning requires first grounding model’s perception in structured auditory scenes. Motivated by Auditory Scene Analysis, we introduce PAQA, a large-scale dataset for Perception-Aware Question Answering covering over 300 categories. PAQA adopts a hierarchical decoupling strategy that separates speech from environmental sounds and distinguishes among multiple speakers, providing explicit perceptual supervision for audio reasoning. Building on this, we propose HyPeR, a two-stage Hybrid Perception-Reasoning framework for perception-grounded audio understanding. In Stage I, the model is fine-tuned on PAQA for cold start to improve perception of acoustic attributes in complex auditory scenes. In Stage II, we further refine its internal reasoning via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). To support deliberation under acoustic ambiguity, we introduce PAUSE tokens for latent computation and a Perceptual Consistency Reward to align reasoning rationales with the underlying audio evidence. Extensive ablation studies isolate the effects of the perception-attention mechanism, self-correction module, and pause-based reasoning strategy. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that HyPeR consistently improves over the base model, including on MMAU-mini (+13.1%), MMAR (+25.5%), and PAQA (+28.2%), while achieving performance comparable to much larger models. Additional analyses of inference latency and computational overhead show that these gains come with acceptable efficiency trade-offs. Overall, our results demonstrate the effectiveness of hybrid perception-grounded reasoning for robust audio understanding.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, ensuring their fair responses across demographics has become crucial. Despite many efforts, an ongoing challenge is hidden bias: LLMs appear fair under standard evaluations, but can produce biased responses outside those evaluation settings. In this paper, we identify framing – differences in how semantically equivalent prompts are expressed (e.g., “A is better than B” vs. “B is worse than A”) – as an underexplored contributor to this gap. We first introduce the concept of “framing disparity” to quantify the impact of framing on fairness evaluation. By augmenting fairness evaluation benchmarks with alternative framings, we find that (1) fairness scores vary significantly with framing and (2) existing debiasing methods improve overall (i.e., frame-averaged) fairness, but often fail to reduce framing-induced disparities. To address this, we propose a framing-aware debiasing method that encourages LLMs to be more consistent across framings. Experiments demonstrate that our approach reduces overall bias and improves robustness against framing disparities, enabling LLMs to produce fairer and more consistent responses.

Abstract:
LLM agents can reason and use tools, but they often break down on long-horizon tasks due to unbounded context growth and accumulated errors. Common remedies such as context compression or retrieval-augmented prompting introduce trade-offs between information fidelity and reasoning stability. We present InfiAgent, a general-purpose framework that keeps the agent’s reasoning context strictly bounded regardless of task duration by externalizing persistent state into a file-centric state abstraction. At each step, the agent reconstructs context from a workspace state snapshot plus a fixed window of recent actions. Experiments on DeepResearch and an 80-paper literature review task show that, without task-specific fine-tuning, InfiAgent with a 20B open-source model is competitive with larger proprietary systems and maintains substantially higher long-horizon coverage than context-centric baselines. These results support explicit state externalization as a practical foundation for stable long-horizon agents.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) hold significant promise for healthcare, yet their reliability in high-stakes clinical settings is often compromised by hallucinations and a lack of granular medical context. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can mitigate these issues, standard supervised pipelines require computationally intensive searches over massive external knowledge bases, leading to high latency that is impractical for time-sensitive care. To address this, we introduce Keys-to-Knowledge (K2K), a novel framework that replaces external retrieval with internal, key-based knowledge access. By encoding essential clinical information directly into the model’s parameter space, K2K enables rapid retrieval from internal key–value memory without inference-time overhead. We further enhance retrieval quality through activation-guided probe construction and cross-attention reranking. Experimental results demonstrate that K2K achieves state-of-the-art performance across four benchmark healthcare outcome prediction datasets.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly used in inventive problem-solving, but effective support requires more than open-ended idea generation. Inventive problem-solving requires improving one aspect of a technical system without unintentionally worsening another. TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving) provides a unique and structured framework for this setting by representing engineering trade-offs as contradictions and linking them to standardized inventive principles. However, prior TRIZ–LLM evaluations are typically small-scale, case studies in focused areas of technology, and rarely grounded in patent text, which makes it difficult to assess structured reasoning at scale. We introduce TRIZBench, a dataset and benchmark for TRIZ reasoning grounded in open technical sources and U.S. patents. TRIZBench evaluates the core TRIZ workflow through three tasks: contradiction prediction, inventive principle prediction, and grounded TRIZ reasoning. Experiments with multiple LLM baselines show that detecting contradictions is easier than recovering correct trade-off pairs, while principle prediction benefits from explicitly exploiting TRIZ structure. Our findings further underscore the importance of grounding. We show that semantic retrieval enables evidence-based justifications and helps explain why LLMs fail. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/ellenzhuwang/trizbench.

Abstract:
Writing a literature review requires a deep understanding of the relationships among cited papers: how they build on, challenge, or offer alternative perspectives to one another. We present Graph-Reasoning Aided Survey Planning (GRASP), a framework combining LLM planning for related work generation with graph algorithms to extract key relationships among cited papers. Our two-layer graph structure consists of a Graph of Thoughts and an Argument-Counteragument Planning Network, representing the cited papers at different levels of granularity, and we apply topology-aware pruning via a Steiner tree to identify the core inter-paper relationships captured in our graph. Our citation analysis-based evaluation shows that GRASP generates RWS that closely match human-written targets in terms of the discourse roles, intents, and grouping of citations.

Abstract:
Hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs)—characterized by the generation of content inconsistent with contextual facts or logical constraints—remains a persistent challenge for reliable deployment. In this work, we address this issue through a geometric framework rooted in the linear representation hypothesis. We propose that hallucinations manifest as orthogonal noise relative to the semantic manifold of the residual stream. Specifically, we hypothesize that while attention heads ideally propagate information congruent with the context subspace, hallucinations arise when specific heads introduce components orthogonal to this subspace, disrupting the coherence of the latent representation. Based on this formulation, we introduce Dynamic Contextual Orthogonalization (DCO), an inference-time intervention method. DCO utilizes the input residual stream as a dynamic context anchor to perform orthogonal decomposition on attention head outputs. To distinguish between context-aligned semantic updates and divergent noise, DCO employs a layer-wise Z-score suppression mechanism that selectively attenuates outlier orthogonal components based on statistical distributions. Evaluations on Llama-3-8B and 70B across benchmarks such as XSum, NQ-Swap, and IFEval demonstrate that DCO achieves superior contextual faithfulness compared to state-of-the-art intervention baselines. Furthermore, DCO maintains high performance on knowledge-intensive tasks like TriviaQA and TruthfulQA, effectively mitigating the trade-off between hallucination suppression and parametric knowledge retention often observed in existing methods. Our findings validate the geometric interpretation of hallucinations and establish DCO as a computationally efficient approach for enforcing manifold alignment.Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DCO-4AB0

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in healthcare suffer from severe confirmation bias, often hallucinating visual details to support initial, potentially erroneous diagnostic hypotheses. Existing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approaches lack intrinsic correction mechanisms, rendering them vulnerable to error propagation. To bridge this gap, we propose Dialectic-Med, a multi-agent framework that enforces diagnostic rigor through adversarial dialectics. Unlike static consensus models, Dialectic-Med orchestrates a dynamic interplay between three role-specialized agents: a proponent that formulates diagnostic hypotheses; an opponent equipped with a novel visual falsification module that actively retrieves contradictory visual evidence to challenge the Proponent; and a mediator that resolves conflicts via a weighted consensus graph. By explicitly modeling the cognitive process of falsification, our framework guarantees that diagnostic reasoning is tightly grounded in verified visual regions. Empirical evaluations on MIMIC-CXR-VQA, VQA-RAD, and PathVQA demonstrate that Dialectic-Med not only achieves state-of-the-art performance but also fundamentally enhances the trustworthiness of the reasoning process. Beyond accuracy, our approach significantly enhances explanation faithfulness and decisively mitigates hallucinations, establishing a new standard over single-agent baselines.

Abstract:
Sampling methods for large language models select candidate tokens based on logit statistics, implicitly assuming that high logits indicate desirable outputs. We identify the Logit Conflation Problem, where a token’s logit aggregates prompt-independent factors, including linguistic fluency and parametric associations, with prompt-relevance. However, only prompt-relevance determines instruction-following quality. We propose SEAL-Sampling (Signal Extraction for Active ReLevance) to isolate this component through attention-weighted attribution. Our framework defines prompt-relevance as the causal effect of prompt content on token logits and establishes attention patterns as an efficient proxy. Experiments on LLaMA-3 demonstrate significant improvements over top-nσ, with gains of 1.8% on AlpacaEval 2.0 and 2.2% on IFEval. Furthermore, attribution scores correlate weakly with raw logits, confirming the extraction of an orthogonal signal. The method is training-free and introduces minimal latency, adding less than 12ms overhead per token.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly adopted as autonomous agents in interactive environments, yet their ability to proactively address safety hazards remains insufficient. We introduce SafetyALFRED, built upon the embodied agent benchmark ALFRED, augmented with six categories of real-world kitchen hazards. While existing safety evaluations focus on hazard recognition through disembodied question answering (QA) settings, we evaluate eleven state-of-the-art models from the Qwen, Gemma, and Gemini families on not only hazard recognition, but also active risk mitigation through embodied task planning. Our experimental results reveal a significant alignment gap: while models can accurately recognize hazards in QA settings, average mitigation success rates for these hazards are low in comparison. Our findings demonstrate that static evaluations through QA are insufficient for physical safety, advocating for a paradigm shift toward benchmarks that prioritize multi-step corrective actions in embodied context.

Abstract:
The widespread application of LLMs has made MGT detection increasingly important in cyberspace security and governance. The existing detection paradigms mainly focus on statistical likelihood or deep embeddings. However, in complex applications such as short texts, derivative works, and cross-domain content, the discriminative capabilities fragility of these conventional methods increases significantly with the development of LLMs. Conversely, our research reveals that LLMs exhibit inherent style inertia. To address these limitations, this study attempts to synergize stylometrics and semantics for identifying MGT. This approach draws from the forensic perspective of experts who detect human imitation by focusing on stylistic nuances. Based on the above inspiration, we propose Stylometric-Semantic LLM Attribution (SSLA), a framework that extracts model-specific stylistic fingerprints across lexical, syntactic, and structural dimensions. SSLA employs a dual-path attention fusion architecture to dynamically integrate explicit stylistic signals with implicit semantic encodings. Extensive experiments across six LLM families demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance. Notably, SSLA achieves a Macro-F1 score of 95.6% on the challenging Wikipedia dataset, demonstrating exceptional robustness and surpassing state-of-the-art baselines like OTBDetector.

Abstract:
Understanding social interaction, which encompasses perceiving numerous and subtle multimodal cues, inferring unobservable mental states and relations, and dynamically predicting others’ behavior, is the foundation for achieving human-machine interaction. Despite rapid advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), the rich and multifaceted nature of social interaction has hindered the development of benchmarks that holistically evaluate and guide their social interaction abilities. Based on social relation theory, which has been widely regarded as a foundational framework for understanding social behavior, we provide SIV-Bench, a novel video benchmark for systematically evaluating MLLMs’ capabilities across Social Scene Understanding (SSU), Social State Reasoning (SSR), and Social Dynamics Prediction (SDP). SIV-Bench features 2,792 originally collected video clips and 5,455 meticulously generated question-answer pairs derived from a human-LLM collaborative pipeline. It covers 14 typical relationships, diverse video lengths, genres, presentation styles, and linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Our comprehensive experiments show that leading MLLMs perform relatively well on SSU but remain weak on SSR and SDP, with the systematic confusion in relation inference as a key bottleneck. An in-depth analysis of the reasoning process attributes MLLMs’ suboptimal performance to misalignment with human thoughts and insufficient reasoning depth. Moreover, we find audio and subtitles aid in reasoning-intensive SSR and SDP. Together, SIV-Bench offers a unified testbed to measure progress, expose limitations, and guide future research toward more socially intelligent MLLMs.

Abstract:
Distilling large reasoning models (LRMs) has become essential for making their Long-CoT reasoning capabilities practical, as full-scale inference remains computationally prohibitive. Existing curation-based approaches, which select complete reasoning traces post-hoc, overlook the collaborative potential of heterogeneous teachers and fail to adapt exploration dynamically, often leading to redundant sampling and missed opportunities for complementary reasoning. To address this, we introduce CoRD, a collaborative multi-teacher decoding framework that performs step-wise reasoning synthesis guided by predictive perplexity–based scoring and beam search. This approach enables heterogeneous LRMs to jointly construct coherent reasoning trajectories while maintaining diverse, high-potential hypotheses efficiently. Experiments show that CoRD generates higher-quality reasoning data and achieves student performance approaching teacher-level results, demonstrating that fine-grained collaboration among diverse LRMs yields structured, efficient, and robust reasoning distillation. The dataset and model are available at https://github.com/DISL-Lab/CoRD

Abstract:
Memory serves as a pivotal component in interactive response generation, supplying essential background information and referential knowledge for dialogues. Conventional interactive algorithms have predominantly treated memory as a merely contextual element, largely neglecting the nuanced cognitive processes involved in individualized memory encoding and retrieval. This conceptual gap has led to the prevailing schema where memory-enhanced dialogue datasets incorporate monolithic, undifferentiated memory content, failing to capture the personalized nature of persoa memory processing. Grounded in the self-reference effect from cognitive psychology, we introduce a Multi-Turn Dialogue Dataset with Personalized Contextual Memory (), establishing a comprehensive benchmark to facilitate advanced research on personalized memory processing algorithms.

Abstract:
Adapting large language models (LLMs) to domain-specific tasks via fine-tuning is often infeasible: models are protected by intellectual property, while sensitive data cannot be shared due to privacy regulations. A promising paradigm, Offsite Tuning (OT), addresses this challenge by constructing an emulator of the original model. Data owners leverage the emulator to train an adapter on downstream data, which is then plugged back into the original model, enabling knowledge transfer without transmitting either the original model or the raw data. However, emulators constructed by existing OT-based methods often retain substantial inference capabilities, thereby exposing model capability privacy and posing risks of misuse. To address this, we propose Loss Landscape Elevation Offsite Tuning (LLEOT), a framework that secures data privacy as well as model parameter and capability privacy. At its core, Loss Landscape Elevation (LLE) enforces a fixed margin between the loss landscapes of the emulator and the original model. We theoretically demonstrate that LLE simultaneously (i) degrades emulator inference via perplexity amplification and (ii) preserves gradient alignment, ensuring consistent convergence for adapter training. Extensive experiments confirm that LLEOT achieves strong adaptation performance while effectively mitigating emulator misuse. Code is available at https://github.com/Z-eloto/LLEOT.

Abstract:
High-quality, diverse data are vital for large language models (LLMs) but remain scarce and costly. Data synthesis is a viable alternative and succeeds on closed tasks, yet the humanities and social sciences (HSS) are overlooked, and their open-ended nature makes synthesis challenging.Moving beyond prior capability-centric, fragmented attempts, we adopt a subject-centric paradigm, define the first HSS domain system covering 14 mainstream fields, and introduce HSS-Synth—the first data synthesis pipeline for HSS.HSS-Synth comprises: (1) constructing seed document from web corpora via multi-step filtering and text refinement evaluated by a judge; (2) specifying “requirements + persona” to backtranslate seed document into diverse yet faithful instructions with strict Q&A alignment check; and (3) breaking LLM response limits via teacher-forced Answering that fed seed documents during response to anchor semantics, reduce hallucinations, and preserve tone and integrity.HSS-Synth yields 237k high-quality, diverse instruction-tuning samples that outperform 14 leading baselines on 16 benchmarks. The fine-tuned Qwen3-8B-Base set new SOTA and approached official Qwen3-8B, improving both human preference and knowledge capability without performance seesaws. Extensive experiments demonstrate the HSS-Synth’s robustness and transferability.Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/pengr/HSS-Synth.

Abstract:
Existing evaluations of large language models primarily rely on single-agent dilemmas or static binary-choice tasks, offering limited insight into how cooperation contexts influence LLM behavior. We introduce CoopValue, a multi-agent evaluation framework that assesses LLMs’ value preferences through cooperative scenarios. CoopValue includes 1,778 scenarios spanning all pairwise conflicts among the 10 Schwartz values and three cooperation types: reciprocal, coopetitive, and altruistic. We evaluate 24 LLMs across 8 model families and examine how their value preferences vary across different cooperative contexts, showing the importance of assessing LLM value preferences in interactive, context-sensitive settings to guide the selection and deployment of LLMs aligned with desired cooperative behavior.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have notably progressed in multi-step and long-chain reasoning. However, extending their reasoning capabilities to encompass deep interactions with search remains a non-trivial challenge, as models often fail to identify optimal reasoning–search interaction trajectories, resulting in suboptimal responses. We propose R-Search, a novel reinforcement learning framework for Reasoning–Search integration, designed to enable LLMs to autonomously execute multi-step reasoning with deep search interaction, and learn optimal reasoning–search interaction trajectories via multi-reward signals, improving response quality in complex logic- and knowledge-intensive tasks. R-Search guides the LLM to dynamically decide when to search or reason, while globally integrating key evidence to enhance deep knowledge interaction between reasoning and search. During RL training, R-Search provides multi-type rewards to jointly optimize the reasoning–search trajectory. Experiments on seven datasets show that R-Search significantly outperforms mainstream RAG baselines.

Abstract:
Factual knowledge stored in Large Language Models (LLMs) inevitably becomes outdated or erroneous over time, making it critical to update these models without incurring the high cost of retraining. Existing sequential knowledge editing methods predominantly rely on strict orthogonal projection to preserve previously edited knowledge. However, this excessive constraint limits gradient expressiveness, resulting in a significant degradation of model generalization and overall performance as the number of edits increases. To address this challenge, we propose Dual-Importance Projection Editing (DipEdit). This method leverages Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to identify critical gradient subspaces and introduces a dual mechanism comprising "accumulated importance" and "projection importance." Unlike traditional approaches that enforce strict orthogonality, DipEdit dynamically scales gradient components parallel to key subspaces based on their projection importance rather than discarding them directly. This approach enhances the model’s adaptability to new knowledge while maximally preserving historical knowledge. Extensive experiments conducted on five mainstream LLMs using the ZsRE and Counterfact datasets demonstrate that DipEdit effectively handles thousands of sequential edits. The proposed method achieves an average comprehensive performance improvement of 10.36% and effectively maintains the model’s general capabilities on downstream tasks. Code is available at: https://github.com/czhhhla/DipEdit.

Abstract:
As language models accelerate scientific research by automating hypothesis generation and implementation, a new bottleneck emerges: evaluating and filtering hundreds of AI-generated ideas without exhaustive experimentation. We ask whether LMs can learn to forecast the empirical success of research ideas before any experiments are run. We study comparative empirical forecasting : given a benchmark-specific research goal and two candidate ideas, predict which will achieve better benchmark performance. We construct a dataset of 11,488 idea pairs grounded in objective outcomes from PapersWithCode. While off-the-shelf 8B-parameter models struggle (30% acc.), SFT dramatically boosts performance to 77.1%, outperforming GPT-5 (61.1%). By framing evaluation as a reasoning task via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), we train models to discover latent reasoning paths, achieving 71.35% acc. with interpretable justifications. Through additional ablations and out-of-distribution tests, we show robustness to surface-level heuristics and transfer to both a cross-domain time-split test set and an independently constructed test set. Our results demonstrate that compute-efficient small language models can serve as effective, objective verifiers, offering a scalable path for autonomous scientific discovery.

Abstract:
In real-world applications of natural language processing, it is essential to effectively adapt a pre-trained model to a downstream task. While text classification is undertaken as a downstream task, it is crucial to produce meaningful sentence embedding that is adaptive to the task. In this paper, we explore how to effectively adapt a pre-trained model for extracting meaningful context representations from sentences, and propose an uncertainty-aware contrastive sentence embedding approach that involves addressing language ambiguity and inter-class separability for a text classification task. Specifically, we design an end-to-end strategy for driving the process of learning to transform a word embedding matrix into a contextualized sentence vector and to quantify the representation uncertainty of the sentence, while the word embedding matrix is produced by a pre-trained model without fine-tuning, and a label-wise contrastive learning strategy is designed to enhance intra-class compactness and inter-class separability. The results on public data sets show that a considerable improvement of text classification accuracy is achieved by adopting the proposed approach in comparison with using those state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Generating spoken dialogue is inherently more complex than monologue text-to-speech (TTS), as it demands both realistic turn-taking and the maintenance of distinct speaker timbres. While existing autoregressive (AR) models have made progress, they often suffer from high inference latency and stability issues. To overcome these limitations, we propose ZipVoice-Dialog, a non-autoregressive (NAR) zero-shot spoken dialogue generation model based on flow-matching. Observing that applying vanilla flow-matching to dialogue generation leads to poor speech intelligibility and turn-taking precision, we introduce two simple yet effective methods to adapt flow-matching architectures for dialogue generation: (1) a curriculum learning strategy to ensure robust speech-text alignment, and (2) speaker-turn embeddings to govern precise speaker turn-taking. Additionally, we introduce dedicated strategies to support stereo dialogue generation.Recognizing the lack of training datasets in this field, we curate and release OpenDialog, the first large-scale (6.8k hours) open-source spoken dialogue dataset derived from in-the-wild speech data. Moreover, for fair and rigorous evaluations, we established a benchmark to comprehensively evaluate dialogue generation models. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods and dataset, showing that ZipVoice-Dialog achieves superior performance in inference speed, intelligibility, speaker turn-taking accuracy, and speaker similarity. Our code, model checkpoints, and the OpenDialog dataset are publicly available.

Abstract:
Human visual reasoning typically follows a coarse-to-fine attention process, starting from global scene understanding and gradually focusing on question-relevant regions. However, multimodal large language models may deviate from this pattern due to attention drift and the underutilization of visual evidence, which can lead to hallucinations. To mitigate these issues, this study proposes a Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment (DICA), which tracks two information-theoretic indicators during inference: Visual Attention Entropy (VAE), which reflects the concentration of visual attention, and Output Image Correlation (OIC), which measures the dependence of generated outputs on the visual input. An abnormal increase in VAE or a decrease in OIC corresponds to different failure modes, which trigger targeted contrastive alignment to restore visual grounding. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DICA consistently outperforms existing approaches and substantially reduces hallucinations, highlighting the effectiveness of indicator-driven intervention in improving multimodal inference reliability. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/BGWH123/DICA/.

Abstract:
Multi-tenant Model-as-a-Service (MaaS) LLM serving must maintain stringent quality of service (QoS) despite heterogeneous requests competing for constrained GPU resources. In practice, MaaS workloads exhibit non-stationarity across multiple time scales, including request bursts, request-composition drift, and persistent workload shifts. Because workloads change across multiple time scales, existing request schedulers often rely on a single fixed policy (e.g., First-Come-First-Served, FCFS) that remains unchanged at runtime, which can lead to unstable QoS. We propose H-MAS, a hierarchical multi-agent scheduler that operates in a layered closed loop: a perception/prediction layer infers lightweight request attributes and cost signals; a feedback layer summarizes runtime metrics into short- and long-horizon QoS states; a hierarchical control layer updates the active scheduling policy over longer horizons and tunes execution parameters over shorter horizons; and an execution layer applies these decisions during inference. Experiments with load scaling and Azure-trace replays show that H-MAS achieves 1.2 × –3.0 × higher Goodput than SGLang and vLLM, and maintains more stable QoS under workload drift, diverse request lengths and heterogeneous SLO targets.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has demonstrated wide adoption in the post-training of Large Language Models (LLMs). In GRPO, prompts are answered by the model and preferred behaviour is learnt via reinforcement learning. Owing to the small communication volume, GRPO is inherently suitable for decentralised training as the prompts can be concurrently answered by multiple nodes and these completions are exchanged in the form of strings. In this work, we explore the robustness of decentralised GRPO by presenting the first adversarial attacks and countermeasures. We present a diverse set of attacks where malicious nodes poison benign models by sharing their poisoned completions. We demonstrate these attacks on math and coding tasks and show that an adversary can achieve attack success rates of up to (100%) in as few as 50 iterations. Moreover, to mitigate the attacks, we propose two defense mechanisms that check logit probabilities of completions or utilize an LLM judge to filter completions. The defenses prevent all but the DoS attack that causes unnecessarily lengthy but conceptually correct completions. The code of both attacks and defenses can be found at: https://github.com/gensyn-ai/HTTT.

Abstract:
Standardized benchmarks have become the dominant metric for measuring progress in large language models, yet their validity is increasingly compromised by data contamination and the unclear relationship between benchmark scores and genuine language understanding. We introduce Gaperon, a suite of fully open bilingual (French-English) language models designed as an experimental testbed to investigate evaluation dynamics under realistic training conditions. Our study makes three core contributions. First, we demonstrate mismatches between benchmark performance and generation quality: models that excel on benchmarks may underperform in qualitative text generation, and vice versa. Second, through our deliberately contaminated Gaperon-Garlic variant, we show that competitive benchmark scores can be recovered via late-stage contamination with only moderate degradation of generation quality, and surprisingly, such contamination also improves performance on held-out benchmarks. Third, we provide empirical evidence that widely used neural quality filters, particularly those trained to favor instructional or educational content, amplify benchmark contamination in pretraining corpora, with the DCLM classifier systematically ranking benchmark samples in the top-5 percentiles of samples. We release all models, data mixtures, checkpoints, and evaluation code to support reproducibility and further investigation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models have recently shown impressive capabilities in reasoning and code generation, making them promising tools for natural language interfaces to relational databases. However, existing approaches often fail to generalize in complex, real-world settings due to the highly database-specific nature of SQL reasoning, which requires deep familiarity with unique schemas, ambiguous semantics, and intricate join paths. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel two-stage LLM-based framework that decouples knowledge acquisition from query generation. In the Exploration Stage, the system autonomously constructs a database-specific knowledge base by navigating the schema with a Monte Carlo Tree Search–inspired strategy, generating triplets of schema fragments, executable queries, and natural language descriptions as usage examples. In the Deployment Stage, a dual-agent system leverages the collected knowledge as in-context examples to iteratively retrieve relevant information and generate accurate SQL queries in response to user questions. This design enables the agent to proactively familiarize itself with unseen databases and handle complex, multi-step reasoning. Extensive experiments on large-scale benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly improves accuracy over strong baselines, highlighting its effectiveness and generalizability.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced LLM reasoning, yet often incurs substantial computational overhead due to “overthinking”: generating excessively long rationales without commensurate accuracy gains. Existing efficiency methods typically apply uniform compression, which overlooks a critical observation that reasoning complexity is heterogeneous at two distinct granularities: across different problems and within individual reasoning steps. This motivates our principle of Thinking Economically : intelligently allocating computational resources based on intrinsic task and step demands rather than pursuing uniform brevity. We propose Hierarchical Adaptive Budgeter (HAB), a training framework that operationalizes this principle through coarse-to-fine budgeting. At the inter-step level, HAB predicts the optimal reasoning depth for each problem. At the intra-step level, HAB learns step-specific token budgeting signals from PPL-derived step comparisons and an adaptive Pareto optimization objective that captures the local quality-efficiency trade-off, while a Fisher Information-based pruner further provides fine-grained training-time guidance, thereby encouraging the generator to internalize more economical reasoning patterns. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH500 show that HAB not only surpasses standard CoT in accuracy but also reduces token usage, achieving a stronger performance-efficiency trade-off than the compared baselines.

Abstract:
As numerous instruction-tuning datasets continue to emerge, dynamically balancing and optimizing their mixtures has become a criticalchallenge. To address this, we propose DynamixSFT, a dynamic and automated method for instruction-tuning dataset mixture optimization. We formulate the problem as a multi-armed bandit setup and introduce a Prior-scaled Boltzmann Exploration that softly anchors the updated sampling distribution to the original dataset proportions, thereby preserving the inherent diversity and coverage of the collection. Sampling probabilities are updated using a lightweight 1-Step Look-ahead Reward, reflecting how much the dataset contributes to improving the model’s performance at its current state. We demonstrate that DynamixSFT effectively optimizes the TÜLU-2-mixture andTÜLU-3-mixture collections across 10 benchmarks, while introducing minimal computational overhead over naive sampling. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive analysis and visualizations to offer deeper insights into the adaptive dynamics of our method.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive results in natural language processing (NLP) tasks, however, their brittleness against subtle input perturbations continues to pose a significant challenge. Existing research on robustness has predominantly focused on standard text-based perturbations and the use of invisible characters and homoglyphs, while overlooking the impact of stylized characters increasingly prevalent on social media. To address this, we propose TinyAttack , a novel adversarial attack framework designed to exploit vulnerabilities in LLMs through Unicode-based stylistic transformations. TinyAttack utilises five Unicode variants to modify the visual rendering of text without altering its underlying semantic or syntactic structure. Our comprehensive evaluation on both open-source (Llama, Mistral, Gemma, Qwen) and closed-source LLMs (Gemini, GPT) demonstrates their susceptibility to these stylized inputs, with performance drops ranging from 29-92% and 6-88.5%, respectively, across all tasks.Our code is available at https://github.com/TRAI-group/TinyAttack.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are primarily accessed via commercial APIs, but this often requires users to expose their data to service providers. In this paper, we explore how users can stay in control of their data by using privacy profiles: simple natural language instructions that say what should and should not be revealed. We build a framework where a local model uses these instructions to rewrite queries, only hiding details deemed sensitive by the user, before sending them to an external model, thus balancing privacy with performance. To support this research, we introduce PEEP, a multilingual dataset of real user queries annotated to mark private content and paired with synthetic privacy profiles, alongside PROFIT, a training procedure that enables effective and efficient use of the pipeline. Experiments with lightweight local LLMs show that, after training, they not only achieve markedly better privacy preservation but also match or exceed the performance of much larger few-shot models.

Abstract:
While large language models show promise in mental healthcare, evaluating their therapeutic competence remains challenging due to the unstructured and longitudinal nature of counseling. We argue that current evaluation paradigms suffer from an unanchored defect, leading to two forms of instability: process drift, where unsteered client simulation wanders away from specific counseling goals, and standard drift, where static pointwise scoring lacks the stability for reliable judgment. To address this, we introduce Ps, a unified framework that calibrates the therapeutic competence of LLMs via trajectory-anchored tournaments. We first anchor the interaction trajectory in simulation, where clients precisely control the fluid consultation process to probe multifaceted capabilities. We then anchor the battle trajectory in judgments through an efficient Swiss-system tournament, utilizing dynamic pairwise battles to yield robust Elo ratings. Beyond ranking, we demonstrate that tournament trajectories can be transformed into credible reward signals, enabling on-policy reinforcement learning to enhance LLMs’ performance. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of PsychePass and its strong consistency with human expert judgments.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents augmented with external tools often struggle as number of tools grow large and become domain-specific. In such settings, ambiguous tool descriptions and under-specified agent instructions frequently lead to tool mis-selection and incorrect slot/value instantiation. We hypothesize that this is due to two root causes: generic, one-size-fits-all prompts that ignore tool-specific nuances, and underspecified tool schemas that lack clear guidance on when and how to use each tool and how to format its parameters. We introduce Joint Tool-Prompt Reflective Optimization (JTPRO), a framework for improving tool-calling reliability in trace-supervised settings by iteratively using rollout-driven reflection to co-optimize global instructions and per-tool schema/argument descriptions for accurate tool selection and argument instantiation in large tool inventories. JTPRO is designed to preserve only tool-local cues needed for correct disambiguation and slot filling. We evaluate JTPRO across multi-tool benchmarks, which account for different number of tools using three metrics: Tool Selection Accuracy (TSA), Slot Filling Accuracy(SFA), and Overall Success Rate(OSR) (correct tool + correct slots + correct values). JTPRO consistently outperforms strong baselines, including CoT-style agents, and reflective prompt optimizers such as GEPA by 5%–20% (relative) on OSR. Ablations show that joint optimization of instructions and tool schemas is more effective and robust than optimizing either component in isolation.

Abstract:
LLM-powered coding agents are redefining how real-world software is developed. To drive the research towards better coding agents, we require challenging benchmarks that can rigorously evaluate the ability of such agents to perform various software engineering tasks. However, popular coding benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-Bench focus on narrowly scoped tasks such as competition programming and patch generation. In reality, software engineers have to handle a broader set of tasks for real-world software development. To address this gap, we propose OmniCode, a novel software engineering benchmark that contains a broader and more diverse set of task categories beyond code or patch generation. Overall, OmniCode contains 1794 tasks spanning three programming languages – Python, Java, and C++ – and four key categories: bug fixing, test generation, code review fixing, and style fixing. In contrast to prior software engineering benchmarks, the tasks in OmniCode are (1) manually validated to eliminate ill-defined problems, and (2) synthetically crafted or recently curated to avoid data leakage issues, presenting a new framework for synthetically generating diverse software tasks from limited real-world data. We evaluate OmniCode with popular agent frameworks such as SWE-Agent and show that while they may perform well on bug fixing for Python, they fall short on tasks such as Test Generation and in languages such as C++ and Java. For instance, SWE-Agent achieves a maximum of 25.0% with DeepSeek-V3.1 on C++ Test Generation. OmniCode aims to serve as a robust benchmark and spur the development of agents that can perform well across different aspects of software development.

Abstract:
Current AI-powered code assistance tools often struggle with ambiguous problem statements that lack sufficient task context and requirements specification. Recent analysis of software engineering agents reveals that failures on such ambiguous requests are highly correlated with longer trajectories involving either over-exploration or repeated attempts at applying the same fix without proper evolution or testing, leading to suboptimal outcomes across software development tasks. We introduce CodeScout, a breakthrough contextual query refinement approach that systematically converts ambiguous user requests into comprehensive, actionable problem statements through lightweight pre-exploration of the target codebase. Our key innovation is demonstrating that structured analysis before task execution can supplement existing agentic capabilities without requiring any modifications to their underlying scaffolds. CodeScout performs targeted context scoping, conducts multi-perspective analysis examining potential fixes and exploration opportunities, then synthesizes these insights into enhanced problem statements with reproduction steps, expected behaviors, and targeted exploration hints. This pre-exploration directly addresses the identified failure patterns by reducing non-converging agent trajectories while clarifying user intent in natural language space. We evaluate CodeScout using state-of-the-art agentic scaffolds and language models on SWEBench-Verified, demonstrating a 20% improvement in resolution rates with up to 27 additional issues resolved compared to the default baseline method. Our results suggest that systematic query refinement through contextual analysis represents a promising direction for enhancing AI code assistance capabilities.

Abstract:
Graph problems are fundamentally challenging for large language models (LLMs). While LLMs excel at processing unstructured text, graph tasks require reasoning over explicit structure, permutation invariance, and computationally complex relationships, creating a mismatch with the representations of text-based models. Our work investigates how LLMs can be effectively applied to graph problems despite these barriers. We introduce a human-interpretable structural encoding strategy for graph-to-text translation that injects graph structure directly into natural language prompts. Our method involves computing a variant of Weisfeiler–Lehman (WL) similarity classes and maps them to human-like color tokens rather than numeric labels. The key insight is that semantically meaningful and human-interpretable cues may be more effectively processed by LLMs than opaque symbolic encoding. Experimental results across multiple graph algorithms and predictive tasks show significant improvements from our method on both synthetic and real-world datasets. By capturing both local and global-range dependencies, our method enhances LLM performance, especially on graph tasks that require reasoning over global graph structure.

Abstract:
Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows, automated support for academic rebuttal, a crucial step in academic communication and peer review, remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on off-the-shelf LLMs or simple pipelines, which struggle with long-context understanding and often fail to produce targeted and persuasive responses. In this paper, we propose DRPG, an agentic framework for automatic academic rebuttal generation that operates through four steps: Decompose reviews into atomic concerns, Retrieve relevant evidence from the paper, Plan rebuttal strategies, and Generate responses accordingly. Notably, the Planner in DRPG reaches over 98% accuracy in identifying the most feasible rebuttal direction. Experiments on data from top-tier conferences demonstrate that DRPG significantly outperforms existing rebuttal pipelines and achieves performance beyond the average human level using only an 8B model. Our analysis further demonstrates the effectiveness of the planner design and its value in providing multi-perspective and explainable suggestions. We also showed that DRPG works well in a more complex multi-round setting. These results highlight the effectiveness of DRPG and its potential to provide high-quality rebuttal content and support the scaling of academic discussions.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed as social agents, yet their ability to integrate conflicting identity cues remains underexplored. We audit gender bias in ten recent MLLMs using a counterfactual cooperative gaming task that pairs synthetic voices with avatars of varying gender presentation and visual fidelity. Our analysis reveals distinct bias patterns that can occur independently: closed-source models (e.g., Gemini 2.5/3) exhibit a near-deterministic “voice-matching” bias that enforces binary alignment between voice and appearance, whereas open-weight models (e.g., Qwen-2.5-Omni-7B) show limited responsiveness to vocal cues and instead exhibit context-driven stereotypes, such as preferring male avatars in combat scenarios. We further find that reducing visual realism attenuates matching tendencies in some models. These findings demonstrate that multimodal fairness is not monolithic; models may appear unbiased on one dimension while enforcing strict identity congruence or role-based stereotypes on another. Code and data are available at https://github.com/halfhoon/whose-voice-whose-avatar .

Abstract:
The primary goal of Motivational Interviewing (MI) is to help clients build their own motivation for behavioral change. To support this in dialogue systems, it is essential to guide large language models (LLMs) to generate counselor responses aligned with MI principles. By employing a schema-guided approach, this study proposes a method for updating multi-frame dialogue states and a strategy decision mechanism that dynamically determines the response focus in a manner grounded in MI principles. The proposed method was implemented in a dialogue system on two different datasets and evaluated through a user study. Results showed that the proposed method successfully generates responses aligned with MI principle and frequently asks questions to elicit change talk.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promise in graph understanding, but remain limited by input-token constraints, facing scalability bottlenecks and lacking effective mechanisms to coordinate textual and visual modalities. To address these challenges, we propose GraphVista, a unified framework that enhances both scalability and modality coordination in graph understanding. For scalability, GraphVista organizes graph information hierarchically into a lightweight GraphRAG base, which retrieves only task-relevant textual descriptions and high-resolution visual subgraphs, compressing redundant context while preserving key reasoning elements. For modality coordination, GraphVista introduces a planning agent that routes tasks to the most suitable modality—using the text modality for simple property reasoning and the visual modality for local and structurally complex reasoning grounded in explicit topology. Extensive experiments demonstrate that GraphVista scales to large graphs, up to 200× larger than those used in existing benchmarks, and consistently outperforms existing textual, visual, and fusion-based methods, achieving up to 4.4× quality improvement over the state-of-the-art baselines by fully exploiting the complementary strengths of both modalities.

Abstract:
Current approaches to proactive assistance move beyond the ask-and-respond paradigm by anticipating user needs. In practice, they either burden users with clarifying questions or rely on context-based extrapolation, often leading to unnecessary or mistimed interventions. Such systems lack explicit mechanisms to model users’ knowledge gaps, resulting in incomplete or suboptimal task outcomes. To address this, we propose PROPER, a framework that explicitly models user-specific knowledge gaps in a controlled manner. Central to our approach is the notion of dimensions: structured, task-relevant factors that define the considerations required for effective task completion. Given a user query, the DGA (Dimension Generating Agent) identifies explicit dimensions (from the user’s query) and generates a set of candidate implicit dimensions capturing unarticulated aspects of the task. The RGA (Response Generating Agent) integrates both explicit and implicit dimensions selectively to produce personalized, context-aware, and proactively informative responses. We evaluate PROPER across multiple domains using a structured, gap-aware rubric that measures coverage, initiative appropriateness, and intent alignment. PROPER improves on quality scores and win rates across all domains, achieving up to 84% gains in single-turn evaluation and consistent dominance in multiturn interactions. All code for PROPER is available at: https://github.com/i-kiran/ProPer-Agent.

Abstract:
Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) remain a persistent challenge, often stemming from inadequate integration of visual information during multimodal reasoning. A key cause is the model’s over-reliance on textual priors and underutilization of visual cues, leading to outputs that are linguistically fluent but visually inaccurate. For example, given an image of an empty kitchen countertop, an LVLM might hallucinate a “bowl of fruit” or “cup of coffee,” relying on language associations rather than visual evidence. Most LVLMs incorporate visual features by appending them to the input stream of a pre-trained LLM and training on large-scale vision-language datasets. Our systematic analysis reveals that this strategy often leads to over-dependence on textual information due to the inherent bias of LLMs towards language-dominant representations. This imbalance skews attention towards the text over visual content, weakening the model’s ability to ground outputs in visual inputs. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective visual feature incorporation method that encourages the model to learn visually-informed textual embeddings distinct from those of the base LLM and promotes a more balanced attention distribution. Experimental results across multiple hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly reduces hallucinations and fosters more balanced multimodal reasoning. Notably, our approach achieves substantial gains, including +9.33 % on MMVP-MLLM, +2.99 % on POPE-AOKVQA, up to +3.4 % on Merlin, and +3 % on the hard-data split of HallusionBench.

Abstract:
Machine unlearning is an emerging technique that removes the influence of a subset of training data (forget set) from a model without full retraining, with applications including privacy protection, content moderation, and model correction. The key challenge lies in achieving strong unlearning efficacy while preserving the overall utility. Existing unlearning methods for large language models (LLMs) often rely on auxiliary models, retain datasets, or even commercial AI services. However, dependence on these external resources is often impractical and could potentially introduce additional privacy risks. In this work, we propose direct token optimization (DTO), a self-contained unlearning approach for LLMs that directly optimizes the token-level objectives to unlearn specific sequences without external resources.For each sequence to be unlearned, we identify target tokens that encode critical knowledge for unlearning and treat remaining tokens as non-target ones for maintaining the model utility. DTO maximizes an unlearning objective on target tokens and applies a utility-preservation regularizer on non-target tokens.Across multiple unlearning benchmarks, DTO improves the forget quality up to 16.8 × over the latest baselines while maintaining comparable model utility. Our code is available at github.com/Emory-AIMS/direct_token_optimization.

Abstract:
The "alignment tax" of post-training is typically framed as a drop in task accuracy. We show it also involves a severe loss of calibration, making models overconfident, less reliable, and model outputs less diverse. We demonstrate that this trade-off can be navigated effectively via a simple post-hoc intervention: interpolating between a model’s weights before and after alignment. Crucially, this is not a strict trade-off. We find that the process consistently reveals Pareto-optimal interpolations—models that improve accuracy beyond both parents while substantially recovering the calibration lost during alignment. Our work demonstrates that simple model merging provides a computationally efficient method for mitigating the full scope of the alignment tax, yielding models that are more capable and more reliable.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) trained via reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) have shown notable progress in scaling test-time compute effectively. In this work, we investigate how synthesized RL data can further improve RLVR. To this end, we propose SynthRL—a scalable and guaranteed pipeline for automatic data scaling in reasoning-oriented RL training. SynthRL comprises three key stages: (1) selecting seed questions with appropriate distribution, (2) augmenting them into more challenging variants while preserving the original answers, and (3) a guaranteed verification stage that ensures near-perfect correctness and difficulty enhancement. Our empirical experiments demonstrate SynthRL’s scalability and effectiveness. When applied to the MMK12 dataset, SynthRL synthesizes over 3.3K additional verifiable, challenging questions from approximately 8K seed samples. Models trained with our synthesized data achieve consistent gains across five out-of-domain visual math reasoning benchmarks, with a significant improvement over baseline models trained on seed data alone. Notably, detailed analysis reveals that the gains are more pronounced on the most challenging evaluation samples, highlighting SynthRL’s effectiveness in eliciting deeper and more complex reasoning patterns.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) remains resource-intensive due to their sheer scale. While zeroth-order (ZO) optimization provides a memory-efficient alternative by eliminating backward passes, its application to multi-hundred-billion-parameter models is constrained by GPU memory and compute throughput. The ZO2 framework addresses the memory bottleneck by offloading model parameters to CPU memory and overlapping transformer block transfer with dual forward computation on a single GPU. However, ZO2 remains limited by its single-device execution and achieves modest throughput. In this work, we present DistZO2 (Distributed Zeroth-Order Offloading), a high-throughput, memory-efficient framework for distributed zeroth-order fine-tuning of LLMs. DistZO2 introduces three parallel strategies: (1) Perturbation Parallelism (PertP), which parallelizes the two perturbed forward passes across devices; (2) Distributed Data Parallelism (DDP), adapted to the scalar-gradient nature of ZO training; and (3) a unified 2D Parallelism design that combines PertP and DDP. To further mitigate communication bottlenecks introduced by parameter offloading, we propose a hardware-aware communication strategy that slices parameter blocks and redistributes them across GPUs via high-speed interconnects such as NVLink. DistZO2 scales zeroth-order fine-tuning to modern multi-GPU systems, preserving ZO2’s memory efficiency while substantially improving training throughput. In our experiments on OPT-175B, DistZO2 achieves a 3x speedup over ZO2 with distributed computing.

Abstract:
Automated analysis of customer feedback on social media is hindered by three challenges: the high cost of annotated training data, the scarcity of evaluation sets, especially in multilingual settings, and privacy concerns that prevent data sharing and reproducibility. We address these issues by developing a generalizable synthetic data generation pipeline applied to a case study on customer distress detection in French public transportation. Our approach utilizes backtranslation with fine-tuned models to generate 1.7 million synthetic tweets from a small seed corpus, complemented by synthetic reasoning traces. We train 600M-parameter reasoners with English and French reasoning that achieve 77-79% accuracy on human-annotated evaluation data, matching or exceeding SOTA proprietary LLMs and specialized encoders. Beyond reducing annotation costs, our pipeline preserves privacy by eliminating the exposure of sensitive user data. Our methodology can be adopted for other use cases and languages.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs), like human language learners, show patterns influenced by their dominant training language. Just as humans display language patterns influenced by their native tongue (semantic accents) when learning new languages, LLMs often default to English-centric responses even when generating in other languages. However, we observe that explicitly providing cultural context in prompts significantly improves the models’ ability to generate culturally localized responses. We term this phenomenon the explicit-implicit localization gap , indicating that while cultural knowledge exists within LLMs, it may not naturally surface in multilingual interaction without explicitly including cultural context. In this paper, we (1) quantify this gap in multiple LLMs using a new cultural localization benchmark and find large (>10%) gaps in the majority of investigated models. (2) Demonstrate a fundamental trade-off between localization accuracy and output diversity. (3) Through mechanistic interpretability, we identify the underlying localization mechanisms within LLMs and show that these mechanisms are both language and task agnostic, with individual steering vectors effectively generalizing across different languages and culturally-relevant tasks.

Abstract:
When LLM agents work together, they seem to be more powerful than a single LLM in mathematical question answering. However, are they also more robust to adversarial inputs? We investigate this question using adversarially perturbed math questions. These perturbations include punctuation noise with three intensities (10%, 30%, 50%), plus real-world and human-like typos (WikiTypo, R2ATA). Using a unified sampling-and-voting framework (Agent Forest), we evaluate six open-source models (Qwen3-4B/14B, Llama3.1-8B, Mistral-7B, Gemma3-4B/12B) across four benchmarks (GSM8K, MATH, MMLU–Math, MultiArith), with various numbers of agents n = 1,2,5,10,15,20,25 . Our findings show that 1) Noise type matters: punctuation noise harm scales with its severity, and the human typos remain the dominant bottleneck, yielding the largest gaps to Clean accuracy and the highest attack success rate (ASR) even with a large number of agents; 2) Collaboration reliably improves accuracy as the number of agents, n, increases, with the largest gains from n=1 to n=5 and diminishing returns beyond n ≈ 10. However, the adversarial robustness gap persists regardless of the agent count.

Abstract:
Empathy plays a crucial role in prosocial behavior and supportive human interactions. According to emotional validation theory, effective empathetic conversations require observing and reflecting on the help-seeker’s situation before offering emotional support and guidance. While recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled fluent and coherent dialogue generation, our preliminary study reveals that existing LLMs struggle to generate emotional support response. Instead, they tend to offer repetitive solutions without sufficiently considering the emotional needs of help-seekers. To address this limitation, we propose EVA : empathetic LLMs with E motional VA lidation. EVA enhances empathetic response generation through a two-stage training process: empathy acquisition and emotional validation alignment. For the emotional validation alignment, we introduce the Emotional Validation Aware Dataset (EVAD), which is annotated with levels of emotional validation theory as conversations progress. Additionally, we propose EVAEval, a novel evaluation metric designed to assess whether a model-generated response aligns with emotional validation theory. Experimental results demonstrate that the EVA method significantly improves empathetic response generation, achieving superior performance in both automatic and human evaluations. Furthermore, comprehensive analyses confirm that the EVA method effectively mitigates patterned responses while ensuring adherence to emotional validation principles.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. However, existing Process Reward Models (PRMs) are vulnerable to reward hacking and require expensive, large-scale annotation of reasoning steps, limiting their reliability and scalability. To address the first problem, we propose a novel reward model approach, Hierarchical Reward Model (HRM), which evaluates both individual and consecutive reasoning steps from fine-grained and coarse-grained level. HRM excels at assessing multi-step mathematical reasoning coherence, particularly in cases where a flawed step is later corrected through self-reflection. Furthermore, to address the inefficiency of autonomously annotating PRM training data via Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), we propose a lightweight data augmentation strategy, Hierarchical Node Compression (HNC), which merges consecutive reasoning steps within the tree structure. Applying HNC to MCTS-generated reasoning trajectories increases the diversity and robustness of HRM training data, while introducing controlled noise with minimal computational overhead. Empirical results on the PRM800K dataset demonstrate that HRM, in conjunction with HNC, achieves superior stability and reliability in evaluation compared to PRM. Furthermore, cross-domain evaluations on MATH500 and GSM8K dataset confirm HRM’s superior generalization and robustness across diverse mathematical reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Instruction tuning is crucial for optimizing Large Language Models (LLMs), as the quality and diversity of instructional data significantly influence model performance. This naturally underscores the importance of an effective and efficient data selection strategy. However, recent mainstream data selection methods typically rely on LLMs to score instruction quality—taking advantage of their capabilities, but at the cost of high computational overhead and reduced data diversity. To address these limitations, in this paper, we propose MergeIT, a novel LLM-based Merging strategy for better Instruction Tuning that shifts the focus from selection to synthesis. MergeIT consists of two stages: first, topic-aware filtering clusters and refines the dataset, preserving diversity while eliminating redundancy without relying on LLM-based scoring, significantly reducing time and computational cost. Second, LLM-based merging synthesizes semantically similar instructions into more informative and compact training data, enhancing data richness while further reducing the size of the dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that MergeIT enables efficient, diverse, and scalable instruction selection and synthesis, establishing LLM-based merging as a promising alternative to prior scoring-based selection methods for instruction tuning.

Abstract:
Retrieval over visually rich documents is essential for tasks such as legal discovery, scientific search, and enterprise knowledge management. Existing approaches fall into two paradigms: single-vector retrieval, which is efficient but coarse, and multi-vector retrieval, which is accurate but computationally expensive. To address this trade-off, we propose HEAVEN, a plug-and-play two-stage hybrid-vector framework. In the first stage, HEAVEN efficiently retrieves candidate pages using a single-vector method over Visually-Summarized Pages (VS-Pages), which assemble representative visual layouts from multiple pages. In the second stage, it reranks candidates with a multi-vector method while filtering query tokens by linguistic importance to reduce redundant computations. To evaluate retrieval systems under realistic conditions, we also introduce ViMDoc, a benchmark for visually rich, multi-document, and long-document retrieval. Across four benchmarks, HEAVEN attains 99.87% of the Recall@1 performance of multi-vector models on average while reducing per-query computation by 99.82%, achieving efficiency and accuracy. Our code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/juyeonnn/HEAVEN

Abstract:
Reasoning models have attracted increasing attention for their ability to tackle complex tasks, embodying the System II (slow thinking) paradigm in contrast to System I (fast, intuitive responses). Yet a key question remains: Does slower reasoning necessarily lead to more truthful answers? Our findings suggest otherwise. We conduct the first systematic study of the inverse scaling law in slow-thinking paradigms for multimodal reasoning. We find that when confronted with incomplete or misleading visual inputs, slow-thinking models are more prone to fabricating plausible yet false details to justify untruthful reasoning. To analyze this behavior, we construct a 5,000-sample hierarchical prompt dataset annotated by 50 human participants. The prompts progressively increase in complexity, revealing a consistent pattern: slower reasoning models tend to follow depth-first search (DFS) thinking, persistently exploring flawed premises, while faster chat models favor breadth-first search (BFS) inference, showing greater caution under uncertainty. These findings reveal a critical vulnerability of reasoning models: while effective in structured domains such as math, their DFS-style reasoning becomes fragile when confronted with ambiguous, multimodal inputs.

Abstract:
The increasing complexity of lunar exploration calls for intelligent systems capable of supporting autonomous operations and scientific decision-making under uncertain and resource-limited conditions. Advances in large language models (LLMs) create new opportunities for mission planning, but their reliability in dynamic, safety-critical environments remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks focus on static, context-independent reasoning tasks and fail to capture the constraints and dependencies of lunar missions. To address this gap, we introduce Lunar-Bench, a benchmark designed to assess the task-oriented reasoning and decision-making performance of LLMs through 3,000 tasks derived from mission procedures and documentation. We further propose the Environmental Scenario Indicators, a process-based framework that evaluates safety, efficiency, integrity, and alignment beyond conventional accuracy. Experiments on 36 representative models show that the best achieves 47.8% accuracy compared with 65.1% for human experts. Lunar-Bench and ESI together provide a principled foundation for developing reliable systems for future missions.

Abstract:
Critic-free reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), exemplified by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), avoids training a value function (critic) and reduces memory and compute overhead relative to critic-based PPO pipelines for aligning large language models. However, GRPO-style advantage estimation depends on prompt-local (within-prompt-group) reward statistics and can be unstable. In particular, when all rollouts in a prompt group receive identical rewards, the within-group reward variance becomes zero, and group normalization yields zero advantages for that group, impeding learning in cold-start regimes with binary verifiers. We introduce BV-Blend, a critic-free framework that stabilizes advantage estimation by combining prompt-local on-policy statistics with semantic-cluster-conditioned historical moments. BV-Blend maintains EMA-tracked reward moments for each cluster, derives a confidence weight from a standard error of the mean (SEM) proxy, and uses this weight to blend historical and prompt-local baseline and variance statistics into a standardized advantage for PPO-style clipped updates. Experiments on verifiable reasoning benchmarks show that BV-Blend improves training stability and performance, and remains robust in regimes where group-normalized methods may stall.

Abstract:
Stereotypes are social constructs shaping human perception and behavior that can produce harmful outcomes under specific conditions. Recent work shows that large language models (LLMs) may inherit and amplify such social harms. However, most existing research often focuses only upon stereotypical biases and overlooks stereotypes and the rich social psychological literature on them, resulting in resource wastage and slowed progress in stereotype research.We argue that meaningful progress in mitigating stereotypes in LLMs requires tighter integration between social psychology and computational research. To address this gap, we review core social psychological theories and frameworks and analyze their computational operationalization, highlighting substantial open opportunities.We also analyze computational progress across media narratives, body imaging, and multilingual, multicultural, and multimodal contexts, identifying key gaps and limitations in each domain.We also present a unified analysis of challenges in stereotype research.We further discuss implications for responsible AI, highlighting stereotypes as a major source of downstream harms, and briefly examine the limitations of current mitigation approaches along with potential improvements via explainability and interpretability. We frame stereotypes in AI as socio-technical phenomena and urge further research in responsible AI, informed by the perspectives and future directions presented in this paper.

Abstract:
Multi-hop Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) requires coherent reasoning across relational paths, yet existing methods often treat each reasoning step independently and fail to effectively leverage experience from prior explorations, leading to fragmented reasoning and redundant exploration. To address these challenges, we propose Trajectoryaware Reasoning with Adaptive Context and Exploration priors (TRACE), an experiential framework that unifies LLM-driven contextual reasoning with exploration prior integration to enhance the coherence and robustness of multihop KGQA. Specifically, TRACE dynamically translates evolving reasoning paths into natural language narratives to maintain semantic continuity, while abstracting prior exploration trajectories into reusable experiential priors that capture recurring exploration patterns. A dualfeedback re-ranking mechanism further integrates contextual narratives with exploration priors to guide relation selection during reasoning. Extensive experiments on multiple KGQA benchmarks demonstrate that TRACE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Spatial Intelligence (SI) have predominantly relied on Vision-Language Models (VLMs), yet a critical question remains: does spatial understanding originate from visual encoders or the fundamental reasoning backbone? Inspired by this question, we introduce SiT-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the SI performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) without pixel-level input, comprises over 3,800 expert-annotated items across five primary categories and 17 subtasks, ranging from egocentric navigation and perspective transformation to fine-grained robotic manipulation. By converting single/multi-view scenes into high-fidelity, coordinate-aware textual descriptions, we challenge LLMs to perform symbolic textual reasoning rather than visual pattern matching. Evaluation results of state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs reveals that while models achieve proficiency in localized semantic tasks, a significant "spatial gap" remains in global consistency. Notably, we find that explicit spatial reasoning significantly boosts performance, suggesting that LLMs possess latent world-modeling potential. Our proposed dataset SiT-Bench serves as a foundational resource to foster the development of spatially-grounded LLM backbones for future VLMs and embodied agents.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities across a wide range of complex tasks and are increasingly deployed at scale, placing significant demands on inference efficiency. Prior work typically decomposes inference into prefill and decode stages, with the decode stage dominating total latency. To reduce time and memory complexity in the decode stage, a line of work introduces sparse-attention algorithms. In this paper, we show, both empirically and theoretically, that sparse attention can paradoxically increase end-to-end complexity: information loss often induces significantly longer sequences, a phenomenon we term “Less is Less” (Lil). To mitigate the Lil problem, we propose an early-stopping algorithm that detects the threshold where information loss exceeds information gain during sparse decoding. Our early-stopping algorithm reduces token consumption by up to 90% with a marginal accuracy degradation of less than 2% across reasoning-intensive benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have driven major advances across domains, yet their massive size hinders deployment in resource-constrained settings. Low-rank factorization addresses this challenge by compressing models to effectively reduce their computation and memory consumption while maintaining accuracy. While these compressed models boast benign performance and system-level advantages, their trustworthiness implications remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study of how low-rank factorization affects LLM trustworthiness across privacy, adversarial robustness, ethics, and fairness, complemented by an explainability-driven analysis of the internal mechanisms behind these trust-related changes. We evaluate multiple LLMs of different sizes and architectures compressed with various low-rank factorization algorithms, revealing key insights: (1) low-rank factorization preserves training data privacy but weakens the protection of personally identifiable information during conversations; (2) adversarial robustness is generally enhanced under compression; (3) ethics degrades in zero-shot prompting but partially recovers in few-shot prompting; (4) fairness declines under compression. Beyond compression, we investigate how model scale and fine-tuning affect trustworthiness. Additionally, to move beyond black-box analysis, we employ a gradient-based attribution to identify which layers of LLMs contribute most to adversarial robustness.

Abstract:
We present AMO-Bench, an Advanced Mathematical reasoning benchmark with Olympiad level or even higher difficulty, comprising 50 human-crafted problems. Existing benchmarks have widely leveraged high school math competitions for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, many existing math competitions are becoming less effective for assessing top-tier LLMs due to performance saturation (e.g., AIME24/25). To address this, AMO-Bench introduces more rigorous challenges by ensuring all 50 problems are (1) cross-validated by experts to meet at least the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) difficulty standards, and (2) entirely original problems to prevent potential performance leakages from data memorization. Experimental results across 36 LLMs on AMO-Bench highlights three key findings: (1) high-level mathematical reasoning remains challenging for current LLMs, with even the best-performing model achieving only 63.1% accuracy and most LLMs scoring below 50%; (2) scaling test-time compute remains a highly effective strategy for substantially improving reasoning performances, and (3) open-source models are progressively narrowing the performance gap with proprietary models. Additionally, we conduct further analysis about reasoning efficiency, volatility, and cross-lingual robustness, providing deeper insights behind the reasoning performances.

Abstract:
Role-playing agents(RPAs) are widely used to steer large language models(LLMs) toward role-consistent behavior, yet existing benchmarks mainly evaluate surface-level fidelity and offer limited insight into decision making under role–alignment value conflicts. To address this gap, we introduce RoleCDE, the first benchmark designed to evaluate RPAs under structured conflicts between role-specific values and alignment-oriented constraints. RoleCDE formulates role-aware decision making as cognitive dilemma scenarios, jointly evaluating role–scenario grounding, value conflict resolution, and decision tendencies. The benchmark is constructed at scale, covering approximately 8k diverse role profiles and scenarios and nearly 240k dilemma instances across three difficulty levels and eight role categories. Evaluation of several mainstream LLMs reveals a "Role Value Decoupling" phenomenon, where agents systematically default to alignment- and morality-consistent decisions rather than role-specific values when the two conflict, even under explicit role conditioning. This behavior is largely invariant to dilemma difficulty but varies substantially across role categories. We further show that RoleCDE-based fine-tuning effectively mitigates this decoupling by improving value trade-off reasoning, while preserving general role-playing fidelity and general reasoning performance. Code is available at: https://github.com/rabbitrose/RoleCDE .

Abstract:
We introduce AutoMonitor-Bench, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the reliability of LLM-based misbehavior monitors across diverse tasks and failure modes. AutoMonitor-Bench consists of 3,010 carefully annotated test samples spanning question answering, code generation, and reasoning, with paired misbehavior and benign instances. We evaluate monitors using two complementary metrics: Miss Rate (MR) and False Alarm Rate (FAR), capturing failures to detect misbehavior and oversensitivity to benign behavior respectively. Evaluating 12 proprietary and 10 open-source LLMs, we observe substantial variability in monitoring performance and a consistent trade-off between MR and FAR, revealing an inherent safety–utility tension. To further explore the limits of monitor reliability, we construct a large-scale training corpus of 153,581 samples and fine-tune Qwen3-4B-Instruction, to investigate whether training on known, relatively easy-to-construct misbehavior datasets improves monitoring performance on unseen and more implicit misbehaviors. Our results highlight the challenges of reliable, scalable misbehavior monitoring and motivate future work on task-aware designing and training strategies for LLM-based monitors.

Abstract:
Complex reasoning in tool-augmented agent frameworks is inherently long-horizon, causing reasoning traces and transient tool artifacts to accumulate and strain the bounded working context of large language models. Without explicit memory mechanisms, such accumulation disrupts logical continuity and undermines task alignment. This positions memory not as an auxiliary efficiency concern, but as a core component for sustaining coherent, goal-directed reasoning over long horizons.We propose MemoBrain, an executive memory model for tool-augmented agents that constructs a dependency-aware memory over reasoning steps, capturing salient intermediate states and their logical relations. Operating as a co-pilot alongside the reasoning agent, MemoBrain organizes reasoning progress without blocking execution and actively manages the working context. Specifically, it prunes invalid steps, folds completed sub-trajectories, and preserves a compact, high-salience reasoning backbone under a fixed context budget. Together, these mechanisms enable explicit cognitive control over reasoning trajectories rather than passive context accumulation.We evaluate MemoBrain on challenging long-horizon benchmarks, including GAIA, WebWalker, and BrowseComp-Plus, demonstrating consistent improvements over strong baselines.

Abstract:
While LLMs demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities, their internal decision dynamics remain opaque. To render these process interpretable and intervenable, we propose Dynamic Entropy Tracing, a mechanism-aware framework that interprets the evolving "choice state" of attention heads during CoT generation through stepwise head-wise option-logit and entropy tracing. Our analysis reveals distinct functional behaviors at attention heads: Steadfast Heads, characterized by consistently low entropy and producing a sharp, option-selective logit pattern with a stable top choice, and Wavering Heads, characterized by consistently high entropy and producing flat or oscillatory option logits without a persistent winner. Leveraging these traces, we identify a set of intervention targets and perform Selective Head Fine-Tuning, updating solely these selected heads against a frozen backbone. Experiments across the LLaMA and Qwen families reveal a striking plasticity hierarchy: fine-tuning just 30 Wavering Heads recovers over 98% of the performance achieved by full-parameter tuning, and in some settings modestly exceeds it. In contrast, intervening on Steadfast Heads yields much less gains. Our findings translate process-level mechanistic observables into a principled criterion for selective fine-tuning, offering a fundamental insight: the most effective tuning knobs are not the components that signal the final decision, but those that retain uncertainty, and thus plasticity, during its formation.

Abstract:
Large language models have achieved remarkable progress in text generation but still struggle with generative writing tasks. In terms of evaluation, existing evaluation benchmarks include few requirement types and writing reward models are not evaluated. In terms of training, existing studies often enhance writing ability through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). Howerver, existing reward model training remains coarse-grained. To address these issues, we introduce W²Bench, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, and WRL, a fine-grained training framework. W²Bench covers five task categories and seven requirement types, enabling systematic evaluation of both writing and writing reward models by measuring the correlation between reward rankings and golden rankings. WRL constructs positive and negative samples by dropping instruction requirements to construct positive and negative examples, allowing more precise reward model training. Experiments show that our models achieve substantial improvements on various writing benchmarks and exhibit strong generalization. We will release our code and data to support future research.

Abstract:
Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have emerged as an increasingly influential paradigm as they offer a strategic balance between parameter scalability and computational efficiency. However, low-resource language tokens are often routed to different experts than those predominantly activated by high-resource inputs, which limits cross-lingual expert sharing. This cross-lingual routing divergence consequently hinders their efficacy in multilingual contexts. To address this issue, we propose SARA (Semantically Anchored Routing Alignment), a framework designed to transfer specialized capabilities from high-resource languages as anchors to low-resource languages. SARA explicitly aligns the routing distribution of multilingual inputs with high-resource semantic anchors using a symmetric Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence constraint. Unlike traditional distillation methods that operate on output logits, SARA directly aligns the internal routing distributions of MoE layers, encouraging mechanistic consistency in expert selection across languages. We conduct experiments on 2 LLMs across 5 low-resource languages and 3 benchmarks. Experiment results demonstrate that SARA outperforms standard instruction tuning (e.g., +0.8% on Qwen3-30B-A3B and +1.2% on Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct on Global-MMLU benchmark). Further analyses show that SARA effectively addresses performance bottlenecks in low-resource languages, providing a scalable pathway to enhance multilingual capabilities in sparse architectures.

Abstract:
While large language models hold promise for complex medical applications, their development is hindered by the scarcity of high-quality reasoning data. To address this issue, existing approaches typically distill chain-of-thought reasoning traces from large proprietary models via supervised fine-tuning, then conduct reinforcement learning (RL). These methods exhibit limited improvement on underrepresented domains like rare diseases while incurring substantial costs from generating complex reasoning chains. To efficiently enhance medical reasoning, we propose MedSSR, a Medical Knowledge-enhanced data Synthesis and Semi-supervised Reinforcement learning framework. Our framework first employs rare disease knowledge to synthesize distribution-controllable reasoning questions. We then utilize the policy model itself to generate high-quality pseudo-labels. This enables a two-stage, intrinsic-to-extrinsic training paradigm: self-supervised RL on the pseudo-labeled synthetic data, followed by supervised RL on the human-annotated real data. MedSSR scales model training efficiently without relying on costly trace distillation. Extensive experiments on Qwen and Llama demonstrate that our method outperforms existing methods across ten medical benchmarks, achieving up to +5.93% gain on rare-disease tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/tdlhl/MedSSR.

Abstract:
Code localization is a primary bottleneck in automated software development. While parallel tool execution can accelerate discovery, existing agents suffer from a 34.9% redundant tool invocation rate, negating the benefits of parallelism. We introduce FuseSearch, which reframes parallel code localization as a quality–efficiency co-optimization problem. By defining tool efficiency—the ratio of novel information gain to total invocations—we employ a two-stage SFT and RL pipeline to train models in adaptive parallel strategies. Unlike fixed-breadth methods, FuseSearch dynamically adjusts search breadth based on task context, transitioning from exploration to refinement. On SWE-bench Verified, FuseSearch-4B matches SOTA performance (84.7% file-level and 56.4% function-level F 1 scores) while being 93.6% faster, using 67.7% fewer turns and 68.9% fewer tokens. Our findings demonstrate that efficiency-aware training inherently boosts quality by eliminating noisy, redundant signals, enabling high-performance, low-cost localization agents. Code: https://github.com/sxthunder/FuseSearch

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in multi-turn dialogue. However, in multi-turn dialogue, models still struggle to stay aligned with what has been established earlier, follow dependencies across many turns, and avoid drifting into incorrect facts as the interaction grows longer. Existing approaches primarily focus on extending the context window, introducing external memory, or applying context compression, yet these methods still face limitations such as contextual inertia and state drift. To address these challenges, we propose the Adaptive Context Refactoring (ACR) Framework, which dynamically monitors and reshapes the interaction history to mitigate contextual inertia and state drift actively. ACR is built on a library of context refactoring operators and a teacher-guided self-evolving training paradigm that learns when to intervene and how to refactor, thereby decoupling context management from the reasoning process. Extensive experiments on multi-turn dialogue demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines while reducing token consumption. Our code is available at https://github.com/ClannadKno/multi-turn.

Abstract:
Editing presentation slides is a frequent yet tedious task, ranging from creative layout design to repetitive text maintenance. While recent GUI-based agents powered by Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) excel at tasks requiring visual perception, such as spatial layout adjustments, they often incur high computational costs and latency when handling structured, text-centric, or batch processing tasks. In this paper, we propose Talk-to-Your-Slides, a high-efficiency slide editing agent that operates via language-driven structured data manipulation rather than relying on the image modality. By leveraging the underlying object model instead of screen pixels, our approach ensures precise content modification while preserving style fidelity, addressing the limitations of OCR-based visual agents. Our system features a hierarchical architecture that effectively bridges high-level user instructions with low-level execution codes. Experiments demonstrate that for text-centric and formatting tasks, our method enables 34% faster processing, achieves 34% better instruction fidelity, and operates at an 87% lower cost compared to GUI-based baselines. Furthermore, we introduce TSBench, a human-verified benchmark dataset comprising 379 instructions, including a Hard subset designed to evaluate robustness against complex and visually dependent queries. Our code and benchmark are available at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1onwp5m7t3207xZu7HEBTMpdivsiOuqG8?usp=share_link

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) present a promising alternative to dominant autoregressive models (ARMs) by the ability of parallel decoding at the expense of substantial computation and memory costs. Specifically, the cache mechanism for bidirectional attention in dLLMs demands large memory footprint, restricting their ability to handle long contexts under resource-limited settings. Existing cache eviction strategies are primarily designed for ARMs and fail to account for the role of mask tokens and specific characteristics in dLLMs, resulting in suboptimal performance.To address these challenges, we introduce MaskKV , a training-free cache eviction framework tailored to dLLMs, focusing on the effect of mask tokens in dLLMs. MaskKV is built on two key innovations: (1) a mask-query guided scoring mechanism that leverages attention weights to identify and evict less critical prompt tokens for each head; (2) an adaptive cache budgeting strategy that improves efficiency by reducing allocation in intermediate layers and concentrating resources on prompt-preferring heads. On LLaDA with MaskKV , compressing the KV cache to only 256 pairs (less than 5% of tokens) retains 94% of the full-cache performance on LongBench and achieves up to 31 × acceleration at 32k prompt length. Our code will be released on Github.

Abstract:
The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has catalyzed the development of mobile graphic user interface (GUI) AI agents, which is designed to autonomously perform tasks on mobile devices. However, a significant gap persists in mobile GUI agent evaluation, where existing benchmarks predominantly rely on either static frame assessments such as AndroidControl or offline static apps such as AndroidWorld and thus fail to capture agent performance in dynamic, real-world online mobile apps. To address this gap, we present Android Agent Arena (A3), a novel "essential-state" based procedural evaluation system for mobile GUI agents. A3 introduces a benchmark of 100 tasks derived from 20 widely-used, dynamic online apps across 20 categories from the Google Play Store, ensuring evaluation comprehension. A3 also presents a novel "essential-state" based procedural evaluation method that leverages MLLMs as reward models to progressively verify task completion and process achievement. This evaluation approach address the limitations of traditional function based evaluation methods on online dynamic apps. Furthermore, A3 includes a toolkit to streamline Android device interaction, reset online environment and apps and facilitate data collection from both human and agent demonstrations. The complete A3 system, including the benchmark and tools, will be publicly released to provide a robust foundation for future research and development in mobile GUI agents.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning capabilities, their potential for purpose-driven exploration in dynamic geo-spatial environments remains under-investigated. Existing Geo-Spatial Question Answering (GSQA) benchmarks predominantly focus on static retrieval, failing to capture the complexity of real-world planning that involves dynamic user locations and compound constraints. To bridge this gap, we introduce EVGeoQA, a novel benchmark built upon Electric Vehicle (EV) charging scenarios that features a distinct location-anchored and dual-objective design. Specifically, each query in EVGeoQA is explicitly bound to a user’s real-time coordinate and integrates the dual objectives of a charging necessity and a co-located activity preference. To systematically assess models in such complex settings, we further propose GeoRover, a general evaluation framework based on a tool-augmented agent architecture to evaluate the LLMs’ capacity for dynamic, multi-objective exploration. Our experiments reveal that while LLMs successfully utilize tools to address sub-tasks, they struggle with long-range spatial exploration. Notably, we observe an emergent capability: LLMs can summarize historical exploration trajectories to enhance exploration efficiency. These findings establish EVGeoQA as a challenging testbed for future geo-spatial intelligence. The dataset and prompts are available at https://github.com/Hapluckyy/EVGeoQA/.

Abstract:
We introduce Apeiron, a scalable and extensible framework for addressing amorphous user demands through autonomous, full-lifecycle application synthesis. Apeiron models the unstructured app development process as a heuristic optimization problem combining (i) a Computer-Use Agent (CUA) evaluator that simulates personas and demands, (ii) an Activity Tracer that grounds feedback in code-level interaction traces, and (iii) a Locality Controller that constrains changes during continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD). Furthermore, we introduce an innovative data generation approach using CUA-as-a-Judge to tackle data scarcity. Across 300 app scenarios, 2,400 personas, and 46,338 demands, Apeiron outperformed baselines by 10.7% in CUA ratings and 27.8% in user-demand task scores. The optimization process enhances task scores by 64.7%, and the tracer contributes a 25.1% gain. In CI/CD, Apeiron effectively restores 96.9% of the pre-shift mean CUA rating in one optimization step with <30% code changes in response to 30% demand shifts. Finally, a user study ( N=18 ) shows that our CUA ratings strongly correlate with human judgment (Spearman’s 𝜌=0.685 ) and that users prefer Apeiron-synthesized apps over baselines.

Abstract:
Text-based person anomaly search retrieves specific behavioral events from surveillance archives using natural-language queries. Although recent pose-aware methods align geometric structures well, they face a fundamental Pose-Semantic Gap: semantically different actions can share similar skeletal geometries. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can reduce this ambiguity, using them for large-scale retrieval is computationally prohibitive. We propose the Structure-Semantic Decoupled Cascade (SSDC) framework, which decouples retrieval into two stages: (1) Structure-Aware Coarse Retrieval, where a lightweight model quickly filters candidates by skeletal similarity; and (2) Detective Squad Interaction, a multi-agent semantic verification module. The squad consists of a Detective for fast binary filtering, an Analyst for evidence extraction, and a Writer for semantic synthesis. Finally, we re-rank candidates by fusing the synthesized captions with structural priors. Experiments on the PAB benchmark show that SSDC achieves state-of-the-art performance by balancing efficiency and semantic reasoning.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) show strong capabilities in complex reasoning, yet their marginal gains on evidence-dependent factual questions are limited. We find this limitation is partially attributable to a reasoning–answer hit gap, where the model identifies the correct facts during reasoning but fails to incorporate them into the final response, thereby reducing factual fidelity. To address this issue, we propose MR-ALIGN, a Meta-Reasoning informed alignment framework that enhances factuality without relying on external verifiers. MR-ALIGN quantifies state-transition probabilities along the model’s thinking process and constructs a transition-aware implicit reward that reinforces beneficial reasoning patterns while suppressing defective ones at the atomic thinking segments. This re-weighting reshapes token-level signals into probability-aware segment scores, encouraging coherent reasoning trajectories that are more conducive to factual correctness. Empirical evaluations across four factual QA datasets and one long-form factuality benchmark show that MR-ALIGN consistently improves accuracy and truthfulness while reducing misleading reasoning. These results highlight that aligning the reasoning process itself, rather than merely the outputs, is pivotal for advancing factuality in LRMs.

Abstract:
We introduce AVACraft — the first multimodal benchmark environment for complex decision-making in StarCraft II, supporting both traditional Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and modern Vision-Language Model (VLM) paradigms. Existing StarCraft II environments like SMAC rely on abstract state representations that deviate from human perception and lack support for emerging VLM-based decision-making. AVACraft mitigates these limitations via a unified framework, which provides RGB visual inputs, natural language observations and structured state information, enabling systematic comparisons between training-based and zero-shot decision-making methods. Our benchmark features 21 carefully designed scenarios covering micromanagement, coordination and strategic planning, with standardized evaluation protocols for both paradigms. We establish comprehensive baselines using four MARL algorithms (IQL, QMIX, QTRAN, VDN) and multiple state-of-the-art VLMs (GPT-4o, Qwen-VL, etc.). Experimental results reveal their complementary strengths: MARL methods achieve up to 27.1% win rate after 1M training steps in complex scenarios, while VLMs deliver superior zero-shot performance (75–81% win rate) and human-aligned decision processes without any training. Systematic analysis (including expert human evaluation) also identifies key trade-offs between training efficiency, performance ceilings and interpretability across the two paradigms. Our implementation is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/VLM-Play-StarCraft2-70C4 .

Abstract:
With the increasing quality and spread of LLM assistants, the amount of generated content is growing rapidly. In many cases and tasks, such texts are already indistinguishable from those written by humans, and the quality of generation continues to increase. At the same time, detection methods are advancing more slowly than generation models, making it challenging to prevent misuse of generative AI technologies. We propose GigaCheck, a dual-strategy framework for AI-generated text detection. At the document level, we leverage the representation learning of fine-tuned LLMs to discern authorship with high data efficiency. At the span level, we introduce a novel structural adaptation that treats generated text segments as "objects." By integrating a DETR-like vision model with linguistic encoders, we achieve precise localization of AI intervals, effectively transferring the robustness of visual object detection to the textual domain. Experimental results across three classification and three localization benchmarks confirm the robustness of our approach. The shared fine-tuned backbone delivers strong accuracy in both scenarios, highlighting the generalization power of the learned embeddings. Moreover, we successfully demonstrate that visual detection architectures like DETR are not limited to pixel space, effectively generalizing to the localization of generated text spans. To ensure reproducibility and foster further research, we publicly release our source code.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved remarkable success through step-by-step chains of thought, yet they often suffer from excessive redundancy or unfaithful reasoning. Existing methods for shaping LRM behavior typically rely on reinforcement learning or fine-tuning with gold-standard reasoning traces, a paradigm that is both computationally expensive and difficult to scale. In this paper, we reveal that LRMs possess latent reasoning beliefs that internally track their own reasoning traits, which can be captured through simple logit probing without specialized training. Building on this insight, we propose Reasoning Belief Engineering (RELIEF), a simple yet effective framework that shapes LRM behavior by aligning the model’s self-concept with a target belief blueprint. Crucially, RELIEF completely bypasses the need for reasoning-trace supervision. It internalizes desired traits by fine-tuning on synthesized, self-reflective QA pairs that affirm the target belief. Extensive experiments on efficiency and faithfulness tasks demonstrate that RELIEF matches or outperforms behavior-supervised and preference-based baselines while requiring significantly lower training costs. Our analysis further validates that shifting a model’s reasoning belief effectively shapes its actual behavior.

Abstract:
Goal-directed molecular generation requires satisfying heterogeneous constraints such as protein–ligand compatibility and multi-objective drug-like properties, yet existing methods often optimize these constraints in isolation, failing to reconcile conflicting objectives (e.g., affinity vs. safety), and struggle to navigate the non-differentiable chemical space without compromising structural validity. To address these challenges, we propose CAGenMol, a condition-aware discrete diffusion framework over molecular sequences that formulates molecular design as conditional denoising guided by heterogeneous structural and property signals. By coupling discrete diffusion with reinforcement learning, the model aligns the generation trajectory with non-differentiable objectives while preserving chemical validity and diversity. The non-autoregressive nature of diffusion language model further enables iterative refinement of molecular fragments at inference time. Experiments on structure-conditioned, property-conditioned, and dual-conditioned benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods in binding affinity, drug-likeness, and success rate, highlighting the effectiveness of our framework. The code is available at https://github.com/Lee612-1/CAGenMol .

Abstract:
Autoregressive (AR) large audio language models (LALMs) such as Qwen-2.5-Omni have achieved strong performance on audio understanding and interaction, but scaling them remains costly in data and computation, and strictly sequential decoding limits inference efficiency. Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) have recently been shown to make effective use of limited training data, and prior work on DIFFA indicates that replacing an AR backbone with a diffusion counterpart can substantially improve audio understanding under matched settings, albeit at a proof-of-concept scale without large-scale instruction tuning, preference alignment, or practical decoding schemes. We introduce DIFFA-2, a practical diffusion-based LALM for general audio understanding. DIFFA-2 upgrades the speech encoder, employs dual semantic and acoustic adapters, and is trained with a four-stage curriculum that combines semantic and acoustic alignment, large-scale supervised fine-tuning, and variance-reduced preference optimization, using only fully open-source corpora. Experiments on MMSU, MMAU, and MMAR show that DIFFA-2 consistently improves over DIFFA and is competitive to strong AR LALMs under practical training budgets, supporting diffusion-based modeling is a viable backbone for large-scale audio understanding.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) tuned for safety often avoid acknowledging demographic differences, even when such acknowledgment is factually correct (e.g., ancestry-based disease incidence) or contextually justified (e.g., religious hiring preferences). This identity-blindness yields incorrect responses, unnecessary refusals, or generic "equal-treatment" defaults. We study this via difference-awareness classification: given a question involving demographic groups, the task is not to answer directly, but to classify whether a correct answer requires recognizing group differences (YES) or whether groups should be treated identically (NO). Crucially, fine-tuning for accuracy triggers harm drift: model-generated explanations become increasingly harmful as decision accuracy improves, whether by elaborating harmful content, introducing problematic assumptions, or failing to flag harms the baseline identified. To mitigate this, we introduce DART (Distill–Audit–Repair Training), which distills label-conditioned reasoning from a teacher, audits outputs for harm drift cases relative to baseline, and repairs problematic cases via severity-weighted fine-tuning. On eight benchmarks, DART improves Llama-3-8B-Instruct accuracy from 39.0% to 68.8%, with largest gains on equal-treatment prompts (11.3% → 72.6%), while reducing harm drift cases by 72.6%. It also transfers to 280 open-ended real-world queries across medical, legal, policy, and educational domains, improving difference-appropriate responses from 39.8% to 77.5% while reducing refusals from 34.3% to 3.0%. Our results demonstrate that accuracy and safety need not conflict when explicit detection and repair mechanisms are in place.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation tasks. However, their effectiveness heavily relies on supervised training with extensive labeled (e.g., question-answering pairs) or unlabeled datasets (e.g., code snippets), which are often expensive and difficult to obtain at scale. To address this limitation, this paper introduces a method IPC, an unsupervised framework that leverages Internal Probing of LLMs for Code generation without any external corpus, even unlabeled code snippets. We introduce the problem space probing, test understanding probing, solution space probing, and knowledge consolidation and reinforcement to probe the internal knowledge and confidence patterns existing in LLMs. Further, IPC identifies reliable code candidates through self-consistency mechanisms and representation-based quality estimation to train UCoder (coder with unsupervised learning). We validate the proposed approach across multiple code benchmarks, demonstrating that unsupervised methods can achieve competitive performance compared to supervised approaches while significantly reducing the dependency on labeled data and computational resources. Analytic experiments reveal that internal model states contain rich signals about code quality and correctness, and that properly harnessing these signals enables effective unsupervised learning for code generation tasks, opening new directions for training code LLMs in resource-constrained scenarios.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in financial contexts, raising critical concerns about reliability, alignment, and susceptibility to adversarial manipulation. While prior finance-related benchmarks assess LLMs’ capabilities in stock trading, they are often restricted to small sample and fail to demonstrate LLM susceptibility to context with potential human bias. We introduce Fin-Herding (financial herding under long and uncertain financial context), a benchmark for evaluating LLM investment decision-making when faced with uncertainty and possible human-biased opinions. Fin-Herding includes 8868 long firm-specific analyst reports, including firm aspects summarized and analyzed by sophisticated analysts with investment ratings (Bullish/Neutral/Bearish) spanning from various industries. We present large language models with firm analyst reports with/without analyst investment ratings and even with ’fake’ rating, to get investment ratings generated by LLMs. Our results reveal that LLMs tend to herd the explicit bias in context. We also develop a method to detect potential human opinions, which can encourage LLMs to think independently, some models even exceed human performance in predicting future stock return.

Abstract:
Federated low-rank adaptation (LoRA) enables multiple clients to collaboratively fine-tune large language models (LLMs) without disclosing their raw data. However, existing works often experience performance degradation due to biased model aggregation and are hindered by significant communication and computation burden, both limiting training efficiency. In this paper, we propose iFLoRA, an improved Federated LoRA fine-tuning system for LLMs featuring pipelined error-mitigated model aggregation and adaptive matrix-wise parameter freezing. Specifically, iFLoRA mitigates aggregation error by first reconstructing local update matrices from clients’ low-rank matrices. These are then aggregated into a global update, which is decomposed via singular value decomposition (SVD) to form low-rank matrices for the next round. To mitigate the overhead from SVD, iFLoRA employs a pipeline to overlap global aggregation, local computation, and communication. Additionally, iFLoRA implements an adaptive matrix-wise freezing scheme that assesses their stability and selectively freezes them for adaptively adjusted periods, alleviating client training overheads without compromising model performance. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show that iFLoRA can improve time-to-target by 2.17-8.48× than state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/whr819987540/iflora.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel at structural reasoning yet suffer from a sharp logical brittleness in structural consistency. We term this phenomenon Structural Cognitive Overload (SCO), a byproduct of the contention between deep reasoning and safety alignment. However, prior work has predominantly targeted typographic and pixel-level perturbations, leaving the study of SCO largely unexplored. To this end, we propose StructBreak, an automated end-to-end framework designed to quantify SCO. By leveraging StructBreak, we uncover a novel higher-order cognitive overload attack paradigm; notably, this attack operates under a practical black-box setting, requiring no internal model access. Consequently, we utilize this framework to establish a comprehensive benchmark spanning ten diverse threat scenarios. Empirical evaluations on six leading MLLMs reveal that SCO readily triggers toxic generation, yielding a 92% average ASR (up to 97% on Gemini 2.5). To elucidate the mechanism of SCO, we further conduct model-level interpretations spanning attention dynamics, latent space topology, and geometric analysis. Our findings reveal that StructBreak acts as a novel structural channel to circumvent safety filters. Furthermore, the limited efficacy of inherent safety mechanisms underscores that current alignment paradigms are insufficient for the era of complex multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as optimization assistants to produce solutions, generate solver-executable programs, or both. However, current evaluations are misaligned with deployment in three ways: they (P1) fail to represent multimodal problem specifications, (P2) score outcomes only and cannot localize where failures occur along the modeling pipeline, and (P3) rarely report inference cost, obscuring reliability–cost trade-offs. We introduce Graph Optimization benchmark (GOBench), an aligned multimodal benchmark with solver-derived oracles and a four-layer diagnostic protocol that evaluates intermediate artifacts as well as end results, together with the Visual Inference Penalty (VIP) to measure multimodal overhead. Across frontier and open-weight models under paired text-only vs. T+V settings, we find that vision reliably increases inference cost, while its reliability impact is regime-dependent: frontier models often benefit from visual grounding, whereas several mid-tier/open models exhibit a Visual Paradox where vision reduces downstream executability and verification coverage. End-to-end success is frequently bottlenecked by intermediate-stage dropout; supervised fine-tuning on intermediate targets can mitigate this attrition in open models, enabling a reproducible harness for diagnosing failure modes and quantifying reliability–cost trade-offs.

Abstract:
While LLMs demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities when provided with full information in a single turn, they exhibit substantial vulnerability in multi-turn interactions. Specifically, when information is revealed incrementally or requires updates, models frequently fail to integrate new constraints, leading to a collapse in performance compared to their single-turn baselines. We term the root cause as Contextual Inertia : a phenomenon where models rigidly adhere to previous reasoning traces. Even when users explicitly provide corrections or new data in later turns, the model ignores them, preferring to maintain consistency with its previous (incorrect) reasoning path. To address this, we introduce Reinforcement Learning with Single-Turn Anchors (RLSTA), a generalizable training approach designed to stabilize multi-turn interaction across diverse scenarios and domains. RLSTA leverages the model’s superior single-turn capabilities as stable internal anchors to provide reward signals. By aligning multi-turn responses with these anchors, RLSTA empowers models to break contextual inertia and self-calibrate their reasoning based on the latest information. Experiments show that RLSTA significantly outperforms standard fine-tuning and abstention-based methods. Notably, our method exhibits strong cross-domain generalization (e.g., math to code) and proves effective even without external verifiers, highlighting its potential for general-domain applications.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning can enhance large language models (LLMs), but it requires manually designed prompts to guide the model. Recently proposed CoT-decoding enables the model to generate CoT-style reasoning paths without prompts, but it is only applicable to problems with fixed answer sets. To address this limitation, we propose a general decoding strategy—GCoT-decoding—that extends applicability to a broader range of question-answering tasks. GCoT-decoding employs a two-stage branching method combining Fibonacci sampling and heuristic error backtracking to generate candidate decoding paths. It then splits each path into a reasoning span and an answer span to accurately compute path confidence, and finally aggregates semantically similar paths to identify a consensus answer, replacing traditional majority voting. We conduct extensive experiments on six datasets covering both fixed and free QA tasks. Our method not only maintains strong performance on fixed QA but also achieves significant improvements on free QA, demonstrating its generality.

Abstract:
Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as a compelling alternative to autoregressive approaches, enabling parallel text generation with competitive performance. Despite these advantages, there is a critical instability in DLMs: the moving sink phenomenon. Our analysis indicates that sink tokens exhibit low-norm representations in the Transformer’s value space, and that the moving sink phenomenon serves as a protective mechanism in DLMs to prevent excessive information mixing. However, their unpredictable positions across diffusion steps undermine inference robustness. To resolve this, we propose a simple but effective extra sink token implemented via a modified attention mask. Specifically, we introduce a special token constrained to attend solely to itself, while remaining globally visible to all other tokens. Experimental results demonstrate that introducing a single extra token stabilizes attention sinks, substantially improving model performance. Crucially, further analysis confirms that the effectiveness of this token is independent of its position and characterized by negligible semantic content, validating its role as a robust and dedicated structural sink.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks through extended chains of thought but suffer from high inference latency due to autoregressive reasoning. Recent work explores using Small Reasoning Models (SRMs) to accelerate LRM inference, yet existing frameworks such as SpecReason adopt a polling-based design that repeatedly invokes the LRM for verification at every step. This approach is inefficient, as frequent LRM calls introduce a high computational overhead, and is unreliable, since the LRM as a judge is prone to errors. In this paper, we systematically characterize the capability boundaries of SRMs and identify three common types of reasoning risks: (1) path divergence, where SRMs lack the strategic ability to construct an initial plan, causing reasoning to deviate from the most probable path; (2) cognitive overload, where SRMs fail to solve particularly difficult steps; and (3) recovery inability, where SRMs lack robust self-reflection and error correction mechanisms. To address these challenges, we propose TrigReason, a trigger-based collaborative reasoning framework that replaces continuous polling with selective intervention. TrigReason delegates most reasoning to the SRM and activates LRM intervention only when necessary—during initial strategic planning (strategic priming trigger), upon detecting extraordinary overconfidence (cognitive offload trigger), or when reasoning falls into unproductive loops (intervention request trigger). The evaluation results on AIME24, AIME25, and GPQA-D indicate that TrigReason matches the accuracy of full LRMs and SpecReason, while offloading 1.70×–4.79× more reasoning steps to SRMs. Under edge–cloud conditions, TrigReason reduces latency by 43.9% and API cost by 73.3% compared to SpecReason.

Abstract:
To stabilize the training of Large Language Models (LLMs), gradient clipping is a nearly ubiquitous heuristic used to alleviate exploding gradients. However, traditional global norm clipping erroneously presupposes gradient homogeneity across different functional modules, leading to an adverse "spill-over" effect where volatile parameters force unnecessary scaling on stable ones. To overcome this, we propose Adaptive Group-wise Gradient Clipping (AGGC). AGGC partitions parameters into groups based on functional types and regulates each according to its historical behavior using an Exponential Moving Average (EMA). Specifically, it constructs an adaptive interval to simultaneously mitigate gradient explosion and vanishing, while employing a time-dependent scheduling mechanism to balance exploration and convergence. Experiments on LLaMA 2-7B, Mistral-7B, and Gemma-7B models demonstrate that AGGC-enhanced LoRA consistently outperforms standard LoRA and frequently exceeds Full Fine-Tuning performance. Specifically, on the GSM8K benchmark, Mistral-7B fine-tuned with AGGC-enhanced LoRA achieves 72.93% accuracy, surpassing the 69.5% of vanilla LoRA. AGGC also contributes to the stability of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), leading to improved logical deduction in Qwen 2.5 and Llama 3.2 models. Experimental results demonstrate that AGGC effectively addresses the limitations of traditional gradient clipping methods, particularly in overcoming gradient heterogeneity, by utilizing a modular, adaptive clipping strategy to stabilize the training process. Due to its lightweight design, AGGC can be seamlessly integrated into existing post-training pipelines with negligible overhead.

Abstract:
This paper introduces the task of analytical question answering over large, semi-structured document collections. We present MuDABench, a benchmark for multi-document analytical QA, where questions require extracting and synthesizing information across numerous documents to perform quantitative analysis. Unlike existing multi-document QA benchmarks that typically require information from only a few documents with limited cross-document reasoning, MuDABench demands extensive inter-document analysis and aggregation. Constructed via distant supervision by leveraging document-level metadata and annotated financial databases, MuDABench comprises over 80,000 pages and 332 analytical QA instances. We also propose an evaluation protocol that measures final answer accuracy and uses intermediate-fact coverage as an auxiliary diagnostic signal for the reasoning process. Experiments reveal that standard RAG systems, which treat all documents as a flat retrieval pool, perform poorly. To address these limitations, we propose a multi-agent workflow that orchestrates planning, extraction, and code generation modules. While this approach substantially improves both process and outcome metrics, a significant gap remains compared to human expert performance. Our analysis identifies two primary bottlenecks: single-document information extraction accuracy and insufficient domain-specific knowledge in current systems. MuDABench is available at https://github.com/Zhanli-Li/MuDABench.

Abstract:
The rise of social media and generative AI has led to a surge of misinformation online, making reliable fact-checking increasingly critical.Most existing fact-checking research adheres to the decompose-then-verify paradigm, emphasizing verification of individual facts while overlooking the validity of logical dependencies among them. As a result, text containing logical errors may still be misjudged as factual. Moreover, existing datasets and metrics focus on fact completeness and coverage, failing to capture the logical dimension.To help bridge this gap, we propose a content–logic coupled factuality evaluation paradigm, which conceptualizes factuality along two complementary dimensions: content factuality and logic factuality. Under this paradigm, we introduce a holistic solution consisting of LoReFact, the first long-form fact-checking dataset that systematically incorporates the logical dimension; LoRe-Factcheck, a simple yet effective framework for joint content–logic evaluation; and a logic-aware metric named LoReFactScore for exposing and penalizing logical fallacies.Experiments demonstrate the importance of logical factuality and the effectiveness of our proposed paradigm for fact-checking.[Our data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/NUSTM/LoReFact]

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, while effective, suffers from an inherent mechanism flaw: linearity induces overthinking. Constrained by sequential generation, models often produce redundant narration and circular self-corrections to maintain logical context. We propose GoT-R1, a framework that fundamentally mitigates this by replacing verbose linear trajectories with high-density reasoning graphs. Unlike CoT, GoT-R1 decouples logic from narration, modeling deliberation as a structured topology of atomic units. We internalize this inductive bias via a two-stage regimen: synthesizing structural data to distill logical skeletons, followed by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to explicitly reinforce topological integrity. Extensive evaluations across mathematical reasoning and instruction following demonstrate that GoT-R1 consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines. Crucially, it achieves these gains with significantly reduced token overhead, demonstrating that structured reasoning density offers a more robust and parsimonious alternative to the recursive verbosity of standard CoT. The GoT-R1 models are open-sourced on Hugging Face at: https://huggingface.co/collections/MYTH-Lab/got-r1.

Abstract:
Existing Chinese toxic content detection methods mainly target sentence-level classification but often fail to provide readable and contiguous toxic evidence spans. We propose ToxiTrace, an explainability-oriented method for BERT-style encoders with three components: (1) CuSA, which refines encoder-derived saliency cues into fine-grained toxic spans with lightweight LLM guidance; (2) GCLoss, a gradient-constrained objective that concentrates token-level saliency on toxic evidence while suppressing irrelevant activations; and (3) ARCL, which constructs sample-specific contrastive reasoning pairs to sharpen the semantic boundary between toxic and non-toxic content. Experiments show that ToxiTrace improves classification accuracy and toxic span extraction while preserving efficient encoder-based inference and producing more coherent, human-readable explanations. The core training code is available at https://github.com/ZhouF-ECNU/ToxiTrace.

Abstract:
Recently, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated superior logical capabilities compared to traditional Large Language Models (LLMs), gaining significant attention. Despite their impressive performance, the potential for stronger reasoning abilities to introduce more severe security vulnerabilities, though pointed out by some previous works, remains largely underexplored. Existing jailbreak methods often struggle to balance effectiveness with robustness against adaptive safety mechanisms. In this work, we propose SEAL, a novel jailbreak attack that targets LRMs through an adaptive encryption pipeline designed to override their reasoning processes and evade potential adaptive alignment. Specifically, SEAL introduces a stacked encryption approach that combines multiple ciphers to overwhelm the model’s reasoning capabilities, effectively bypassing built-in safety mechanisms. To further prevent LRMs from developing countermeasures, we incorporate two dynamic strategies—random and adaptive—that adjust the cipher length, order, and combination. Extensive experiments on real-world reasoning models, including DeepSeek-R1, Claude Sonnet, and OpenAI GPT-o4-mini, validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, SEAL achieves an attack success rate of 85.6% on GPT o4-mini, outperforming state-of-the-art baselines by a significant margin of 17.2%. Warning: This paper contains examples of inappropriate, offensive, and harmful content

Abstract:
Over the years, scalar MT metrics have advanced rapidly on benchmarks. Yet they remain black boxes, offering little insight into their decisions and sometimes degrading under out-of-distribution inputs. We introduce Remedy-R, a reasoning-driven generative MT metric trained with reinforcement learning from pairwise translation preferences, without requiring error-span annotations or distillation from closed LLMs. Unlike scalar MT metrics that only outputs translation quality scores, Remedy-R produces step-by-step analyses of accuracy, fluency, and completeness, enabling more interpretable assessments. With only 60K pairwise training samples across two language pairs, Remedy-R remains competitive with top scalar metrics and GPT-4-based judges on WMT22–24 metric benchmarks, generalizes to other languages, and shows strong robustness on OOD stress tests. Moreover, Remedy-R generates self-reflective feedback that can be reused for translation refinement. We validate the faithfulness of such feedback with GPT-4 and show that a simple evaluate–revise pipeline leveraging Remedy-R’s analyses consistently improves translation quality across diverse models without any task-specific tuning.

Abstract:
Agentic systems built upon large language models (LLMs) increasingly depend on long-context modeling to support document understanding, long-term memory recall, and multi-step reasoning. However, extending context windows incurs substantial computational and memory overhead, significantly limiting the scalability and practicality of long-context LLM-based agents. Recent studies suggest that visual representations can serve as an effective medium for compressing and organizing long textual content. Motivated by this insight, we propose VizoMem, a novel visual memory framework for agentic systems. In this framework, textual memories are pre-rendered into structured images and stored as visual notes, enabling compact and persistent memory representations. Moving beyond standard vision-language models like Glyph, we pioneer a specialized retrieval system designed for large-scale visual memory. Our innovation lies in the construction of a dedicated dataset and the development of a highly efficient retrieval model that repurposes foundational vision-language encoders to navigate complex, text-heavy visual environments. Experiments on public datasets demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces token consumption while preserving effective long-term memory recall, highlighting its potential as a scalable alternative to conventional long-context modeling.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves the factual accuracy and generation quality of large language models by incorporating external knowledge. However, in multilingual settings, RAG systems suffer from severe language preference. On the one hand, the retrieval stage is sensitive to the query language: semantically equivalent queries expressed in different languages often lead to substantially different retrieval results. On the other hand, when retrieved documents contain knowledge written in multiple languages, large language models tend to be influenced by surface-level language forms, rather than reasoning solely based on semantic relevance to the query.To address these challenges, we propose a unified optimization framework that explicitly disentangles multilingual RAG into language-controllable retrieval and language-agnostic reasoning. Our framework allows LLM to adaptively select retrieval languages while enforcing cross-lingual consistency during reasoning, thereby mitigating language bias without modifying existing retrievers or translators. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively reduces language bias in multilingual RAG and consistently outperforms baselines across multiple multilingual benchmarks.

Abstract:
Continual Learning (CL) is essential for enabling self-evolving large language models (LLMs) to adapt and remain effective amid rapid knowledge growth. Yet, despite its importance, little attention has been given to establishing statistical reliability guarantees for LLMs under CL, particularly in the setting of continual domain pretraining (CDP). Conformal Prediction (CP) has shown promise in offering correctness guarantees for LLMs, but it faces major challenges in CDP: testing data often stems from unknown or shifting domain distributions, under which CP may no longer provide valid guarantees. Moreover, when high coverage is required, CP can yield excessively large prediction sets for unanswerable queries, reducing informativeness. To address these challenges, we introduce an adaptive rejection and non-exchangeable CP framework. Our method first estimates the distribution of questions across domains in the test set using transformer-based clustering, then reweights or resamples the calibration data accordingly. Building on this, adaptive rejection CP allows the LLM to selectively abstain from answering when its confidence or competence shifts significantly. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework enhances both the effectiveness and reliability of CP under CDP scenarios. Our code is available at: https://github.com/AlearZhou/CPCL

Abstract:
What happens when a storyteller forgets its own story? Large Language Models (LLMs) can now generate narratives spanning tens of thousands of words, but they often fail to maintain consistency throughout. When generating long-form narratives, these models can contradict their own established facts, character traits, and world rules. Existing story generation benchmarks focus mainly on plot quality and fluency, leaving consistency errors largely unexplored. To address this gap, we present ConStory-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate narrative consistency in long-form story generation. It contains 2,000 prompts across four task scenarios and defines a taxonomy of five error categories with 19 fine-grained subtypes. We also develop ConStory-Checker, an automated pipeline that detects contradictions and grounds each judgment in explicit textual evidence. Evaluating a range of LLMs through five research questions, we find that consistency errors show clear tendencies: they are most common in factual and temporal dimensions, tend to appear around the middle of narratives, occur in text segments with higher token-level entropy, and certain error types tend to co-occur. These findings can inform future efforts to improve consistency in long-form narrative generation.

Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, enabling the fast development of tools such as stress monitors, wellness trackers, and mental health chatbots. However, this rapid and low-barrier development can also introduce risks, including bias, privacy violations, and unequal access, especially when systems overlook real-world contexts, diverse user needs, and cultural settings. Many recent approaches use AI to identify such risks automatically, but this can reduce human engagement in understanding how harms arise, who they affect, and which stakeholder needs remain unspoken. We present a human-centered ethical foresight framework that generates speculative user stories and supports multi-agent discussions to help people reflect on potential benefits and harms of healthcare AI before deployment. In a user study, participants who engaged with stories identified a broader range of harms, distributing their responses more evenly across all 17 harm types, whereas those who did not engage with stories focused primarily on privacy and well-being (79.1%). Overall, our findings suggest that storytelling helps people anticipate potential risks and benefits and reflect more broadly on how AI systems may affect different users, contexts, and often unspoken needs.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models excel at vision-language tasks but remain prone to hallucinations that undermine their reliability. Existing approaches predominantly treat hallucinations as classification errors, overlooking the heterogeneous behaviors of attention heads and their dynamic influences during inference. We revisit MLLM reasoning from an energy perspective and identify that hallucinations stem from imbalances between visual potential and language prior potential: when visual information is ambiguous or language priors dominate, attention heads tend to be driven by linguistic statistical patterns, generating content inconsistent with visual evidence. We propose AHEAD, a framework that quantifies the energetic properties of each attention head during object generation through two potential networks—the Visual Grounding Potential Network and the Language Prior Potential Network—and dynamically adjusts their contributions at inference time. Specifically, we amplify attention heads with strong visual grounding capacity while suppressing those overly reliant on language priors. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that AHEAD significantly reduces hallucination rates without fine-tuning the base MLLM while maintaining generation quality.

Abstract:
Teacher sentiment analysis is pivotal for understanding instructional dynamics, yet it remains challenging because classroom expressions are professionally regulated performances rather than spontaneous outbursts. However, existing approaches typically treat sentiment as a static, monolithic label, failing to capture this structured heterogeneity. To effectively model this complexity, we decompose teacher sentiment into three granularities: coarse-level performativity, medium-level intra-class heterogeneity, and fine-level cross-modal complementarity. Guided by this perspective, we propose CF-TSA, a coarse-to-fine multimodal framework. Specifically, we employ CLS-guided cross-modal attention to recover effective signals from regulated displays (coarse-level), thresholded substyle discovery to identify latent pedagogical styles (medium-level), and substyle-aware contrastive learning to align dynamic multimodal cue compositions (fine-level). Experiments on T-MED and CMU-MOSEI demonstrate that CF-TSA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, validating the effectiveness of the coarse-to-fine perspective and the hierarchical modeling.

Abstract:
Text-to-image (T2I) generative models have achieved remarkable progress, demonstrating exceptional capability in synthesizing high-quality images from textual prompts. While existing research and benchmarks have extensively evaluated the ability of T2I models to follow the literal meaning of prompts, their ability to reason over prompts with domain knowledge to uncover implicit meaning and contextual nuances remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce T2I-ReasonBench, a novel benchmark designed to explore the knowledge-driven reasoning capabilities of T2I models.T2I-ReasonBench comprises 800 meticulously designed prompts organized into four dimensions: (1) Idiom Interpretation , (2) Textual Image Design , (3) Entity Reasoning , and (4) Scientific Reasoning . These dimensions challenge models to integrate domain knowledge, infer implicit meaning, and resolve contextual ambiguities. To quantify the performance, we introduce a two-stage evaluation framework: a large language model (LLM) generates prompt-specific question-criterion pairs that evaluate if the image includes the essential elements resulting from correct reasoning; a multimodal LLM (MLLM) then scores the generated image against these criteria. Our comprehensive study across 16 state-of-the-art diffusion and unified multimodal models (UMMs) reveal two primary bottlenecks. First, many models lack the foundational reasoning ability to fully comprehend complex prompts. Second, even models with stronger reasoning modules exhibit a persistent gap between their internal understanding and the final generated image. This highlights an urgent need for the next generation of T2I systems to not only improve their reasoning capability but also to enhance integration between reasoning and synthesis.

Abstract:
Neural speech codecs provide discrete representations for speech language models, but emotional cues are often degraded during quantization. Existing codecs mainly optimize acoustic reconstruction, leaving emotion expressiveness insufficiently modeled at the representation level. We propose an emotion-guided neural speech codec that explicitly preserves emotional information while maintaining semantic fidelity and prosodic naturalness. Our framework combines emotion–semantic guided latent modulation, relation-preserving emotional–semantic distillation, and emotion-weighted semantic alignment to retain emotionally salient cues under compression. Extensive evaluations across speech reconstruction, emotion recognition, and downstream text to speech generation demonstrate improved emotion consistency and perceptual quality without sacrificing content accuracy.

Abstract:
Long-horizon agents operate over extended sequences of reasoning and actions, but this inevitably accumulates context noise, resulting in excessive computational cost and information overload. Existing approaches commonly rely on fixed, rule-based summarization strategies (e.g., summarizing every few steps), which are inflexible, lack generalization, and often introduce irreversible information loss. We propose Self-Sum, a framework that empowers agents to autonomously decide when and what to summarize by modeling summarization as a first-class internal cognitive action, unified with external environmental actions within a multi-turn decision-making process. Specifically, we introduce a two-stage training recipe consisting of (i) a cold-start supervised fine-tuning stage that bootstraps summarization behavior, and (ii) a lightweight, summarization-aware reinforcement learning stage that refines summarization timing and content while discouraging unnecessary summaries. Experiments on multiple long-horizon benchmarks show that Self-Sum consistently outperforms no-summarization and rule-based baselines, with particularly strong gains in generalization. Analysis further reveals that Self-Sum learns to summarize sparsely at meaningful moments and preserves task-relevant information, highlighting the importance of jointly learning when and what to summarize for robust long-horizon agent behavior.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating personalized, persuasive text at scale, raising new questions about bias and fairness in automated communication. This paper presents the first systematic analysis of how LLMs behave when tasked with demographic-conditioned targeted messaging. We introduce a controlled evaluation framework using three leading models: GPT-4o, Llama-3.3, and Mistral-Large-2.1, across two generation settings: Standalone Generation, which isolates intrinsic demographic effects, and Context-Rich Generation, which incorporates thematic and regional context to emulate realistic targeting. We evaluate generated messages along three dimensions: lexical content, language style, and persuasive framing. We instantiate this framework on climate communication and find consistent age- and gender-based asymmetries across models: male- and youth-targeted messages tend to emphasize more assertive and progressive framing, while female- and senior-targeted messages more often reflect warmth, care, and traditional themes. Contextual prompts systematically amplify these disparities, with persuasion scores being higher for male-targeted messages, while age-related differences vary across models. Our findings demonstrate how demographic stereotypes can surface and intensify in LLM-generated targeted communication, underscoring the need for bias-aware generation pipelines and transparent auditing frameworks that explicitly account for demographic conditioning in socially sensitive applications.

Abstract:
Despite strong performance on code generation tasks, it remains unclear whether large language models (LLMs) genuinely reason about code execution. Existing code reasoning benchmarks primarily evaluate final output correctness under a single canonical implementation, leaving two critical aspects underexplored: (1) whether LLMs predictions are consistent to functionally equivalent implementations, and (2) whether LLMs can accurately reason about intermediate execution states. We introduce CoRE , a Co de Re asoning benchmark that evaluates code reasoning through implementation invariance and process transparency . Extensive evaluations on eight frontier LLMs reveal two fundamental limitations. First, models exhibit a substantial robustness gap , with performance varying significantly across equivalent implementations. Second, we observe superficial execution , where models arrive at correct final outputs without correctly reasoning about intermediate execution states. Together, these findings demonstrate that output-only evaluations are insufficient for assessing code reasoning and position CoRE as a necessary benchmark for evaluating robust and faithful code reasoning.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has become a standard approach for training mathematical reasoning models; however, GRPO training is computationally intensive and usually takes a long time, which consumes substantial computational resources and creates barriers for academic researchers and smaller organizations with limited GPU budgets. In this paper, we propose MMR-GRPO to accelerate GRPO training and reduce the overall training time required to reach peak performance, and the approach adopts Maximal Marginal Relevanceto reweigh rewards of multiple rollouts by balancing rollout quality with diversity to reduce rollout redundancy. The rationale is that redundant or similar completions, if repeatedly used to train a model, will create an “exploitation trap” and slow down model convergence in GRPO style reinforcement learning. Extensive evaluations across three model sizes (1.5B, 7B, 8B), three GRPO variants, and five mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that MMR-GRPO achieves comparable peak performance while requiring on average 47.9% fewer training steps and 70.2% less wall-clock time. These gains are consistent across models, methods, and benchmarks. Our code is released at: https://github.com/WeiKangda/MMR-GRPO.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly tasked with invoking enterprise APIs, yet they routinely falter when near-duplicate tools vie for the same user intent or when required arguments are left underspecified. We introduce DiaFORGE (Dialogue Framework for Organic Response Generation Evaluation), a disambiguation-centric, three-stage pipeline that (i) synthesizes persona-driven, multi-turn dialogues in which the assistant must distinguish among highly similar tools, (ii) performs supervised fine-tuning of open-source models with reasoning traces across 3B - 70B parameters, and (iii) evaluates real-world readiness via a dynamic suite that redeploys each model in a live agentic loop and reports end-to-end goal completion alongside conventional static metrics. On our dynamic benchmark DiaBENCH, models trained with DiaFORGE raise tool-invocation success by 27 pp over GPT-4o and by 49 pp over Claude-3.5-Sonnet, both under optimized prompting. To spur further research, we release an open corpus of 5000 production-grade enterprise API specifications paired with rigorously validated, disambiguation-focused dialogues, offering a practical blueprint for building reliable, enterprise-ready tool-calling agents.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) augmented with external tools have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks. However, existing frameworks rely heavily on natural language reasoning to determine when tools can be invoked and whether their results should be committed, lacking formal guarantees for logical safety and verifiability. We present ToolGate , a forward execution framework that provides logical safety guarantees and verifiable state evolution for LLM tool calling. ToolGate maintains an explicit symbolic state space as a typed key-value mapping representing trusted world information throughout the reasoning process. Each tool is formalized as a Hoare-style contract consisting of a precondition and a postcondition, where the precondition gates tool invocation by checking whether the current state satisfies the required conditions, and the postcondition determines whether the tool’s result can be committed to update the state through runtime verification. Our approach guarantees that the symbolic state evolves only through verified tool executions, preventing invalid or hallucinated results from corrupting the world representation. Experimental validation demonstrates that ToolGate significantly improves the reliability and verifiability of tool-augmented LLM systems while maintaining competitive performance on complex multi-step reasoning tasks. This work establishes a foundation for building more trustworthy and debuggable AI systems that integrate language models with external tools.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely applied across various domains of finance. Since their training data are largely derived from human-authored corpora, LLMs may inherit a range of human biases. Behavioral biases can lead to instability and uncertainty in decision-making, particularly when processing financial information. However, existing research on LLM bias has mainly focused on direct questioning or simplified, general-purpose settings, with limited consideration of the complex real-world financial environments and high-risk, context-sensitive, multilingual financial misinformation detection tasks (MFMD). In this work, we propose MFMDScen, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating behavioral biases of LLMs in MFMD across diverse economic scenarios. In collaboration with financial experts, we construct three types of complex financial scenarios: (i) role- and personality-based, (ii) role- and region-based, and (iii) role-based scenarios incorporating ethnicity and religious beliefs. We further develop a multilingual financial misinformation dataset covering English, Chinese, Greek, and Bengali. By integrating these scenarios with misinformation claims, MFMDScen enables a systematic evaluation of 22 mainstream LLMs. Our findings reveal that pronounced behavioral biases persist across both commercial and open-source models. This project is available at https://github.com/lzw108/FMD.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant utility in real-world applications, exhibiting impressive capabilities in natural language processing and understanding. Benchmark evaluations are crucial for assessing the capabilities of LLMs as they can provide a comprehensive assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. However, current evaluation methods often overlook the inherent randomness of LLMs by employing deterministic generation strategies or relying on a single random sample, resulting in unaccounted sampling variance and unreliable benchmark score estimates. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical statistical model that provides a more comprehensive representation of the benchmarking process by incorporating both benchmark characteristics and LLM randomness. We show that leveraging multiple generations improves the accuracy of estimating the benchmark score and reduces variance. Multiple generations also allow us to define ℙ (correct), a prompt-level difficulty score based on correct ratios, providing fine-grained insights into individual prompts. Additionally, we create a data map that visualizes difficulty and semantics of prompts, enabling error detection and quality control in benchmark construction.

Abstract:
Retrieving visual and textual information from medical literature and hospital records can enhance diagnostic accuracy for clinical image interpretation. However, multimodal retrieval-augmented diagnosis is highly challenging. We explore a lightweight mechanism for enhancing diagnostic performance of retrieval-augmented LVLMs. We train an LVLM-aware multimodal retriever, such that the retriever learns to return images and texts that guide the LVLM toward correct predictions. In our low-resource setting, we perform only lightweight fine-tuning with small amounts of data, and use only general-purpose backbone models, achieving competitive results in clinical classification and VQA tasks compared to medically pre-trained models with extensive training. In a novel analysis, we highlight a previously unexplored class of errors that we term inconsistent retrieval predictions: cases where different top-retrieved images yield different predictions for the same target. We find that these cases are challenging for all models, even for non-retrieval models, and that our retrieval optimization mechanism significantly improves these cases over standard RAG. However, our analysis also sheds light on gaps in the ability of LVLMs to utilize retrieved information for clinical predictions.

Abstract:
Proxy optimization, where AI systems exploit evaluator weaknesses rather than improve intended objectives, threatens both reinforcement learning (reward hacking) and LLM alignment (evaluator gaming). We introduce the Evaluator Stress Test (EST), an invariance-based framework that detects proxy gaming by separating exploitable sensitivity (e.g., format, physics bugs) from content-driven improvements using controlled perturbations with semantic validity audits. We validate EST across both domains. In RL, across 15 environments and 5 algorithms (2,156 expert-annotated episodes), EST achieves 78.4% precision and 81.7% recall. In LLM alignment, across 4 tasks, 2 model scales, 2 training methods, and 2 judges (1,200 human-annotated instances), EST achieves 74.2% precision and 78.6% recall with early warning signals preceding quality decline. Cross-domain analysis reveals that proxy-true correlation tracking transfers directly between domains, while perturbation design requires domain adaptation. Closed-loop mitigation improves human win-rate by 8.3 points (LLM) and reduces hacking by 54.6% (RL). We release benchmarks for both domains: 2,156 RL episodes and 1,200 LLM instances.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive proficiency in basic arithmetic, rivaling human-level performance on standard numerical tasks. However, little attention has been given to how these models perform when numerical expressions deviate from the prevailing conventions present in their training corpora. In this work, we investigate numerical reasoning across a wide range of numeral scripts and formats. We show that LLM accuracy drops substantially when numerical inputs are rendered in underrepresented scripts or formats, despite the underlying mathematical reasoning being identical. We further demonstrate that targeted prompting strategies, such as few-shot prompting and explicit numeral mapping, can greatly narrow this gap. Our findings highlight an overlooked challenge in multilingual numerical reasoning and provide actionable insights for working with LLMs to reliably interpret, manipulate, and generate numbers across diverse numeral scripts and formatting styles.

Abstract:
In the era of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing, Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for various applications, yet their training is often hindered by barren plateaus (BPs), where gradient variance vanishes exponentially as the qubit size increases. Most initialization-based mitigation strategies rely heavily on pre-designed static parameter distributions, thereby lacking adaptability to diverse model sizes or data conditions. To address these limitations, we propose AdaInit, a foundational framework that leverages large language models with the submartingale property to iteratively synthesize initial parameters for QNNs that yield non-negligible gradient variance, thereby mitigating BPs. Unlike conventional one-shot initialization methods, AdaInit adaptively explores the parameter space by incorporating dataset characteristics and gradient feedback, with theoretical guarantees of convergence to finding a set of effective initial parameters for QNNs. We provide rigorous theoretical analyses of the submartingale-based process and empirically validate that AdaInit consistently outperforms existing initialization methods in maintaining higher gradient variance across various QNN scales. We believe this work may initiate a new avenue to mitigate BPs.

Abstract:
Answering real-world geospatial questions—such as finding restaurants along a travel route or amenities near a landmark—requires reasoning over both geographic relationships and semantic user intent. However, existing large language models (LLMs) lack spatial computing capabilities and access to up-to-date, ubiquitous real-world geospatial data, while traditional geospatial systems fall short in interpreting natural language. To bridge this gap, we introduce Spatial-RAG, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework designed for geospatial question answering. Spatial-RAG integrates structured spatial databases with LLMs via a hybrid spatial retriever that combines sparse spatial filtering and dense semantic matching. It formulates the answering process as a multi-objective optimization over spatial and semantic relevance, identifying Pareto-optimal candidates and dynamically selecting the best response based on user intent. Experiments across multiple tourism and map-based QA datasets show that Spatial-RAG significantly improves performance over strong baselines.

Abstract:
Large-language-model (LLM) agents are becoming competent at straightforward web tasks, such as opening an item page or submitting a form, but still struggle with objectives that require long-horizon navigation, large-scale information extraction, and reasoning under constraints. We present WebDART, a general framework that enables a single LLM to handle such complex chores. WebDART (i) dynamically decomposes each objective into three focused subtasks—navigation, information extraction, and execution—so the model concentrates on one skill at a time, and (ii) continuously re-plans the decomposition as new webpages are revealed, taking advantage of newly discovered filters or shortcuts and avoiding redundant exploration. Evaluated on WebChoreArena, WebDART lifts end-to-end success rates by up to 13.7 percentage points over previous state-of-the-art agents, while matching their performance on the easier WebArena suite and completing tasks with up to 14.7 fewer navigation steps. Code will be publicly available.

Abstract:
Large language models exhibit a critical vulnerability to distractor interference in retrieval-augmented contexts: they fail to prioritize relevant, factually correct documents over topically similar but misleading content. We introduce Lat-Defuse, a mechanistic framework that corrects this failure mode through targeted interventions in the model’s latent space. Using Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), our method operates in an interpretable feature space and formulates correction as constrained counterfactual optimization. On Gemma-2 and Llama-3 model families across three QA benchmarks (BioASQ, Natural Questions, PopQA), our method achieves recovery rates of up to 94% on distractor-vulnerable samples. Successful correction through sparse modifications reveals distractor interference as a localized, systematically addressable phenomenon, opening directions toward universal distractor robustness in LLMs.

Abstract:
Large-scale multitask benchmarks have driven rapid progress in language modeling, yet most emphasize high-resource languages such as English, leaving Bengali underrepresented. We present BnMMLU, a comprehensive benchmark for measuring massive multitask language understanding in Bengali. BnMMLU spans 41 domains across STEM, humanities, social sciences, and general knowledge, and contains 134,375 multiple-choice question–option pairs-the most extensive Bengali evaluation suite to date. The dataset preserves mathematical content via MathML, and includes BnMMLU-HARD, a compact subset constructed from questions most frequently missed by top systems to stress difficult cases. We benchmark 24 model variants across 11 LLM families, spanning open-weights general/multilingual, Bengali-centric open-weights, and proprietary models, covering multiple parameter scales and instruction-tuned settings. We evaluate models under standardized protocols covering two prompting styles (Direct vs. Chain-of-Thought) and two context regimes (0-shot vs. 5-shot), reporting accuracy consistently across families. Our analysis highlights persistent gaps in reasoning and application skills and indicates sublinear returns to scale across model sizes. We release the dataset and evaluation templates to support rigorous, reproducible assessment of Bengali language understanding and to catalyze progress in multilingual NLP.

Abstract:
Existing video understanding benchmarks mainly emphasize general visual recognition and reasoning, but do not adequately capture the pedagogical logic embedded in instructional videos. To address this gap, we present PedagogyBench, a multimodal benchmark for instructional video understanding grounded in pedagogical cognition. We introduce a pedagogy-driven segmentation strategy and a dual-stream semantic injection pipeline that combines machine pre-annotation with expert refinement, enabling the construction of a dataset organized around a cognitive pyramid with four levels and 20 fine-grained tasks. We further propose the Cognitive Fidelity Score (CFS) to measure the balance of model performance across pedagogical cognitive dimensions. Experiments on 12 multimodal large language models reveal a clear generative gap, where models perform relatively well on discriminative tasks but degrade on higher-order pedagogical diagnosis, often relying on parametric memory rather than grounded visual perception. Project resources are available at https://github.com/Shallcom/PedagogyBench.

Abstract:
Going beyond the prediction of numerical scores, recent research in automated essay scoring has increasingly emphasized the generation of high-quality feedback that provides justification and actionable guidance. To mitigate the high cost of expert annotation, prior work has commonly relied on LLM-generated feedback to train essay assessment models. However, such feedback is often incorporated without explicit quality validation, resulting in the propagation of noise in downstream applications. To address this limitation, we propose FeedEval, an LLM-based framework for evaluating LLM-generated essay feedback along three pedagogically grounded dimensions: specificity, helpfulness, and validity. FeedEval employs dimension-specialized LLM evaluators trained on datasets curated in this study to assess multiple feedback candidates and select high-quality feedback for downstream use. Experiments on the ASAP++ benchmark show that FeedEval closely aligns with human expert judgments and that essay scoring models trained with FeedEval-filtered high-quality feedback achieve superior scoring performance. Furthermore, revision experiments using small LLMs show that the high-quality feedback identified by FeedEval leads to more effective essay revisions. We release our code and curated datasets at: https://github.com/BBeeChu/FeedEval.git .

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) scale to support context windows exceeding one million tokens, the linear growth of Key-Value (KV) cache imposes severe memory capacity and bandwidth bottlenecks, constraining the efficiency of long-context inference. Existing compression approaches typically prioritize tokens based on local saliency metrics to decouple prefill computation from decoding memory. However, these methods often rely on local saliency snapshots at a specific layer, thereby systematically discarding tokens that act as global information hubs across the network depth but appear temporarily dormant at the specific layer selected for pruning. To address this limitation, we propose StructKV , a structure-aware KV cache compression framework that introduces three core innovations: First, Global In-Degree Centrality aggregates attention patterns across the network depth to identify global information hubs. Second, Dynamic Pivot Detection utilizes information-theoretic metrics to adaptively locate the optimal layer for compression. Finally, Structural Propagation Decoupling separates the computational budget from the memory storage budget. Experimental results on the LongBench and RULER benchmarks demonstrate that StructKV effectively preserves long-range dependencies and retrieval robustness.

Abstract:
Large language models are often adapted using parameter-efficient techniques such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), formulated as y = W 0 x + BAx , where W 0 is the pre-trained parameters and x is the input to the adapted layer. While multi-adapter extensions often employ multiple LoRAs, prior studies suggest that the inner A matrices are highly similar during training and thus suitable for sharing. We revisit this phenomenon and find that this similarity is largely attributable to the identical initialization rather than shared knowledge, with B playing a more critical role in knowledge encoding and transfer. Motivated by these insights, we propose ALoRA, an asymmetric multi-LoRA design with multiple A matrices and a single shared B in multi-task fine-tuning, and Fed-ALoRA, which shares B across clients in federated fine-tuning under both homogeneous and heterogeneous settings, through a novel matrix decomposition strategy to accommodate heterogeneous ranks across clients. Experiments on commonsense reasoning, math reasoning, multi-task NLP dataset, and federated NLP dataset demonstrate that our methods achieve more balanced performance across tasks with comparable or superior average accuracy relative to existing multi-LoRA approaches. The code is available at https://github.com/OptMN-Lab/ALoRA.

Abstract:
Medical coding converts free-text clinical notes into standardized diagnostic and procedural codes, which are essential for billing, hospital operations, and medical research. Unlike ordinary text classification, it requires multi-step reasoning: extracting diagnostic concepts, applying guideline constraints, mapping to hierarchical codebooks, and ensuring cross-document consistency. Recent advances leverage agentic LLMs, but most rely on rigid, manually crafted workflows that fail to capture the nuance and variability of real-world documentation, leaving open the question of how to systematically learn effective workflows. We present MedDCR, a closed-loop framework that treats workflow design as a learning problem. A Designer proposes workflows, a Coder executes them, and a Reflector evaluates predictions and provides constructive feedback, while a memory archive preserves prior designs for reuse and iterative refinement. On benchmark datasets, MedDCR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and produces interpretable, adaptable workflows that better reflect real coding practice, improving both the reliability and trustworthiness of automated systems.

Abstract:
Large language model-based agents operating in long-horizon interactions require memory systems that support temporal consistency, multi-hop reasoning, and evidence-grounded reuse across sessions. Existing approaches largely rely on unstructured retrieval or coarse abstractions, which often lead to temporal conflicts, brittle reasoning, and limited traceability. We propose MemWeaver, a unified memory framework that consolidates long-term agent experiences into three interconnected components: a temporally grounded graph memory for structured relational reasoning, an experience memory that abstracts recurring interaction patterns from repeated observations, and a passage memory that preserves original textual evidence. MemWeaver employs a dual-channel retrieval strategy that jointly retrieves structured knowledge and supporting evidence to construct compact yet information-dense contexts for reasoning. Experiments on the LoCoMo benchmark demonstrate that MemWeaver substantially improves multi-hop and temporal reasoning accuracy while reducing input context length by over 95% compared to long-context baselines.

Abstract:
Retrieving relevant tables from extensive databases for a given natural language query is essential for accurately answering questions in tasks such as text-to-SQL. Existing table retrieval approaches select a pre-determined set of k tables with the highest similarity to the query. However, the number of required tables varies across queries and cannot be known in advance. Enforcing a fixed number of retrieved tables regardless of the query may either retrieve an undersized set, failing to obtain all necessary evidence, or retrieve an oversized pool, including irrelevant tables. To address this issue, we propose an adaptive table retrieval method that adjusts the number of tables retrieved according to the requirements of each query. Specifically, we utilize an adaptive thresholding mechanism to selectively retrieve tables and integrate a sliding-window reranking algorithm to efficiently process a large table corpus. Extensive experiments on Spider, BIRD, and Spider 2.0 demonstrate that our method effectively addresses the limitations of the top- k retrieval strategy, improving performance in retrieval and downstream tasks. Our code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Adaptive-Table-Retrieval.

Abstract:
Existing jailbreak defense paradigms primarily rely on static detection of prompts, outputs, or internal states, often neglecting the dynamic evolution of risk during decoding. This oversight leaves risk signals embedded in decoding trajectories underutilized, constituting a critical blind spot in current defense systems. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that hidden states in critical layers during the decoding phase carry stronger and more stable risk signals than input jailbreak prompts. Specifically, the hidden representations of tokens generated during jailbreak attempts progressively approach high-risk regions in the latent space. Based on this observation, we propose TrajGuard, a training-free, decoding-time defense framework. TrajGuard aggregates hidden-state trajectories via a sliding window to quantify risk in real time, triggering a lightweight semantic adjudication only when risk within a local window persistently exceeds a threshold. This mechanism enables the immediate interruption or constraint of subsequent decoding. Extensive experiments across 12 jailbreak attacks and various open-source LLMs show that TrajGuard achieves an average defense rate of 95%. Furthermore, it reduces detection latency to 5.2 ms/token while maintaining a false positive rate below 1.5%. These results confirm that hidden-state trajectories during decoding can effectively support real-time jailbreak detection, highlighting a promising direction for defenses without model modification.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently enabled remarkable progress in text representation. However, their embeddings are typically high-dimensional, leading to substantial storage and retrieval overhead. Although recent approaches such as Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL) and Contrastive Sparse Representation (CSR) alleviate these issues to some extent, they still suffer from retrieval accuracy degradation. This paper proposes Isolation Kernel Embedding or IKE, a learning-free method that transforms an LLM embedding into a binary embedding using Isolation Kernel (IK). Lightweight and based on binary encoding, IKE offers a low memory footprint and fast bitwise computation, lowering retrieval latency. Experiments on multiple text retrieval datasets demonstrate that IKE offers up to 16.7 × faster retrieval and 16 × lower memory usage than the original LLM embeddings, while maintaining comparable accuracy. Theoretically, we show that IKE works because it satisfies four essential criteria for effective binary hashing that other methods do not possess. Compared to CSR, IKE consistently achieves better retrieval efficiency and effectiveness. IKE also works effectively with graph-based indexing, demonstrating its superiority in balancing accuracy and latency compared to alternative compression techniques in the approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search setting.

Abstract:
In recent years, the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enabled generated texts to closely mimic human writing, posing significant challenges to the detection of AI-generated content. Current mainstream zero-shot detection methods largely adopt a machine-centric perspective, relying on proxy models to compute token-level AI-likelihood scores and treating all tokens equally during overall detection. However, such approaches overlook the prediction discrepancies that arise when humans and large language models interpret the same text. We argue that tokens exhibiting greater divergence between human and machine predictions can provide stronger clues for determining the authorship of a text. To address this limitation, we propose HAPDA —a human-machine prediction discrepancy adapter for AI-generated text detection (AGTD). The framework consists of two core components: (1) a joint fine-tuning strategy for training paired human-preference and machine-preference models, and (2) a discrepancy-aware reweighting mechanism designed to calibrate token-level detection scores in downstream detectors. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HAPDA consistently and significantly enhances the detection performance of five representative baseline models under various evaluation scenarios.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in automatic code generation, yet their ability to produce high-performance code remains limited, despite its importance in real-world software systems. We argue that this limitation stems not only from data scarcity, but more fundamentally from the lack of supervision that guides interpretable and effective performance improvements. We introduce PerfCoder, a family of LLMs designed to generate performance-enhanced code through interpretable and customized optimization strategies. PerfCoder is fine-tuned on curated real-world optimization trajectories with human-readable annotations and further aligned via reinforcement fine-tuning using runtime feedback, enabling it to generate input-specific strategies and apply them directly without iterative refinement. On the PIE code performance benchmark, PerfCoder outperforms all existing models in both runtime speedup and effective optimization rate, demonstrating that code performance optimization requires strategy awareness rather than scale alone. Moreover, PerfCoder produces interpretable feedback that can guide larger LLMs in a planner–optimizer workflow, substantially improving the performance of 32B models and GPT-5 on code optimization.

Abstract:
Representation learning is fundamental to NLP, but building embeddings that work well at different computational budgets is challenging. Matryoshka Representation Learning (MRL) offers a flexible inference paradigm through nested embeddings; however, learning such structures requires explicit coordination of how information is arranged across embedding dimensionality and model depth. In this work, we propose MIPIC (Matryoshka Representation Learning via Self-Distilled Intra-Relational Alignment and Progressive Information Chaining), a unified training framework designed to produce structurally coherent and semantically compact Matryoshka representations. MIPIC promotes cross-dimensional structural consistency through Self-Distilled Intra-Relational Alignment (SIA), which aligns token-level geometric and attention-driven relations between full and truncated representations using top-k CKA self-distillation. Complementarily, it enables depth-wise semantic consolidation via Progressive Information Chaining (PIC), a scaffolded alignment strategy that incrementally transfers mature task semantics from deeper layers into earlier layers. Extensive experiments on STS, NLI, and classification benchmarks (spanning models from TinyBERT to BGEM3, Qwen3) demonstrate that MIPIC yields Matryoshka representations that are highly competitive across all capacities, with significant performance advantages observed under extreme low-dimensional.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in daily applications, from content generation to code writing, where each interaction treats the model as stateless, generating responses independently without memory. Yet human writing is inherently longitudinal: authors’ styles and cognitive states evolve across months and years. This raises a central question: can LLMs reproduce such temporal structure across extended time periods? We construct and publicly release a longitudinal dataset of 412 human authors and 6,086 documents spanning 2012–2024 across three domains (academic abstracts, blogs, news) and compare them to trajectories generated by three representative LLMs under standard and history-conditioned generation settings. Using drift and variance-based metrics over semantic, lexical, and cognitive–emotional representations, we find temporal flattening in LLM-generated text. LLMs produce greater lexical diversity but exhibit substantially reduced semantic and cognitive–emotional drift relative to humans. These differences are highly predictive: temporal variability patterns alone achieve 94% accuracy and 98% ROC-AUC in distinguishing human from LLM trajectories. Our results demonstrate that temporal flattening persists regardless of whether LLMs generate independently or with access to incremental history, revealing a fundamental property of current deployment paradigms. This gap has direct implications for applications requiring authentic temporal structure, such as synthetic training data and longitudinal text modeling.

Abstract:
As text-to-music models gain widespread adoption, the prompts used to guide these systems have become valuable intellectual property. This shift has given rise to a new form of attack: prompt stealing, aiming to reconstruct the high-value prompts that guide the music generation. However, unlike prior work in text and image generation, prompt stealing in text-to-music systems faces unique challenges due to the entangled and diffuse nature of semantic representations in audio, which complicates the decoupling of specific textual tokens from acoustic outputs. To address these challenges, we present AudioStealer, the first targeted study of prompt inversion in the audio domain. AudioStealer operates via a two-stage black-box attack framework: first, a heuristic search guided by audio-language embeddings identifies initial candidates; then, these candidates are refined using a game-theoretic strategy based on Shapley value estimation to attribute precise semantic contributions. Our method requires no direct access to the target model and relies solely on a shadow model, making it broadly applicable. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that AudioStealer recovers prompts with high textual consistency to the ground truth, while the regenerated audio maintains strong perceptual similarity to the target recordings. These results expose critical vulnerabilities in the text-to-audio market ecosystem and underscore the urgent need for intellectual property protections in generative audio technologies.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable fidelity in simulating social dynamics, yet using them to inform high-stakes crisis policy requires rigorous causal evaluation. We introduce CRISIS COGNITION, a framework rooted in generative Structural Causal Models (SCM) that functions as an in-silico hypothesis generator. By coupling real-world telemetry with 1,813 agents, we conduct a counterfactual simulation to evaluate communication strategies. Unlike prior descriptive work, we employ a Stratified Analysis to strictly control for personality confounders. Our simulations generate a computational hypothesis : within the LLM’s generative process, emotional scaffolding serves as a functional prerequisite to unlock valid reasoning paths for high-neuroticism agents. Crucially, we identify a “Sedative Effect” in simultaneous interventions, confirming that the sequence of support is as vital as the content. This framework provides a rigorous testbed for evaluating strategies before human-subject trials.

Abstract:
In this work, we conduct a systematic analysis of Native Sparse Attention (NSA) and propose targeted improvements that enhance long-context modeling. A key insight is that alternating between local (sliding-window) and global (compression/selective) attention across layers, rather than using fixed patterns, enables more effective propagation of long-range dependencies and substantially boosts performance on long-sequence tasks. Meanwhile, we further refine NSA’s branches with Latent Attention that the sliding-window branch is enhanced with Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) while compression and selective branches adopt Group-head Latent Attention (GLA). These changes reduce KV-cache memory by 50% versus NSA while improving the model’s common-sense reasoning and long-text understanding capabilities. Experiments on models from 340M to 1.3B parameters (trained on 15B and 100B tokens) show our method matches or exceeds full attention and native sparse attention in both common-sense reasoning and long-context understanding tasks.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed as domain-specific agents, many benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate their ability to follow instructions and make decisions in real-world scenarios. However, business scenarios often involve complex standard operating procedures (SOPs), and the evaluation of LLM capabilities in such contexts has not been fully explored. To bridge this gap, we propose SOP-Maze, a benchmark constructed from real-world business data and adapted into a collection of 397 instances and 3422 subtasks from 23 complex SOP scenarios. We further categorize SOP tasks into two broad classes: Lateral Root System (LRS), representing wide-option tasks that demand precise selection; and Heart Root System (HRS), which emphasizes deep logical reasoning with complex branches. Extensive experiments reveal that nearly all state-of-the-art models struggle with SOP-Maze. We conduct a comprehensive analysis and identify three key error categories: (i) route blindness: difficulty following procedures; (ii) conversational fragility: inability to handle real dialogue nuances; and (iii) calculation errors: mistakes in time or arithmetic reasoning under complex contexts. The systematic study explores LLM performance across SOP tasks that challenge both breadth and depth, offering new insights for improving model capabilities. We have open-sourced our work on the anonymous link: https://github.com/meituan-longcat/SOP-Maze.

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable success of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Machine Translation (MT), the scarcity of high-quality parallel corpora and the prohibitive cost of their acquisition constrain scalability. To this end, we propose L earning to T ranslate by T ranslating ( LTT ), an LLM-driven dual-learning framework that enables autonomous translation, achieving an 80.42% performance improvement over the base model. By adapting the cycle-consistency principle to the generative paradigm, LTT eliminates the need for parallel data. It employs a robust semantic-aware reward function that balances adequacy with reconstruction fidelity, effectively mitigating the reward hacking issues inherent in traditional unsupervised MT. Relying solely on monolingual data, our 8B model consistently outperforms significantly larger models (70B+) in low-resource settings and achieves parity with state-of-the-art supervised baselines on mainstream benchmarks. LTT thus offers a scalable, data-efficient paradigm for autonomous machine translation.

Abstract:
The capability to precisely adhere to instructions is a cornerstone for Large Language Models (LLMs) to function as dependable agents in real-world scenarios. However, confronted with complex prompts, LLMs frequently encounter difficulties in fulfilling all specified requirements within a single response. Drawing inspiration from recent advancements in Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and self-correction methodologies, we introduce Meeseeks, a fully automated iterative instruction-following benchmark equipped with an integrated feedback mechanism. Meeseeks identifies erroneous components in model responses and provides corresponding feedback accurately, thereby iteratively guiding the model toward self-correction. The dataset contains over 700 curated instances annotated by 32 distinct capability tags in Chinese and English. Extensive experimental results reveal that different state-of-the-art commercial and open-source LLMs exhibit vastly disparate performance, and even after 20 turns of iterative feedback-driven self-correction, nearly all models demonstrate suboptimal performance. We conducted comprehensive analysis and uncovered numerous common issues prevalent in current state-of-the-art models, as well as several counterintuitive phenomena. Meeseeks has been open-sourced on https://github.com/ADoublLEN/Meeseeks.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-enhanced sequential recommendation typically aims to improve two core components: user semantic embedding extraction and utilization. Despite promising results, existing methods still have two limitations: 1) In the extraction stage, most methods directly input long interaction sequence fragments into LLM for preference summarization. However, excessively long sequences increase inference difficulty, making it challenging to infer accurate user embeddings reliably. 2) In the utilization stage, most methods employ the same semantic embedding utilization strategy for all users, neglecting the differences caused by user activity levels, leading to suboptimal performance. To address these issues, we propose HSUGA, which introduces a simple yet effective plugin for each of the two core components: Hierarchical Semantic Understanding (HSU) and Group-Aware Alignment (GAA). HSU performs a staged two-phase preference mining and models preference evolution through constrained editing operations, thereby improving the reliability of user semantic extraction. GAA adjusts the semantic utilization intensity based on user activity levels, providing weaker alignment for active users and stronger guidance for users with sparse historical data. Finally, extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and compatibility of HSUGA.

Abstract:
Patent similarity evaluation is essential for intellectual property analysis, yet existing methods struggle to capture the multifaceted structure of patent documents encompassing technical specifications, legal boundaries, and application contexts. We propose PatentMind, a framework that performs patent similarity assessment through a Multi-Aspect Reasoning Graph (MARG). PatentMind decomposes patent documents into three dimensions: technical features, application domains, and claim scopes, and computes dimension-specific similarity scores, which are then integrated via a context-aware dynamic weighting mechanism that emulates expert-level judgment. To facilitate evaluation, we introduce PatentSimBench, an expert-annotated benchmark comprising 500 patent pairs. Experiments show that PatentMind achieves a Pearson correlation of r=0.938 with expert annotations, substantially outperforming embedding-based, patent-specific, and prompt engineering baselines. Our framework offers interpretable, multi-dimensional assessment applicable to downstream tasks such as prior art search and infringement risk analysis.

Abstract:
While LLMs have demonstrated remarkable potential in Question Answering (QA), evaluating personalization remains a critical bottleneck. Existing paradigms predominantly rely on surface-level similarity or manual heuristics, often lacking sufficient data-driven validation. We address this by mining Community-Individual Preference Divergence (CIPD)—where individual choices override consensus—to distill six key personalization factors as evaluative dimensions. Accordingly, we introduce CoPA, a benchmark with 1,985 user profiles for fine-grained, factor-level assessment. By quantifying the alignment between model outputs and user-specific cognitive preferences inferred from interaction patterns, CoPA provides a more comprehensive and discriminative standard for evaluating personalized QA than generic metrics. The code is available at https://github.com/bjzgcai/CoPA.

Abstract:
Large Language Models are increasingly integrated into critical applications, yet they remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks where meticulously designed adversarial inputs bypass safety alignment. Existing defenses often rely on externally deployed guardrail models or response inspection, which incur significant computational overhead and latency. We propose RAP-ID (Robust Alignment Preservation via Injection Defense), a mechanistic, train-free detection framework that operates exclusively on internal state dynamics during the initial forward pass. RAP-ID identifies attacks by detecting their inevitable "impostor" behavior: they must mimic system instruction semantics (Directive Likeness), usurp attention from the true system prompt (Counterfactual Gain), and trigger latent risk concepts (Policy Conflict). By fusing these three internal signals, RAP-ID achieves effective detection across diverse attack vectors—from direct jailbreaks to stealthy agentic manipulations—without requiring text generation. Comprehensive evaluations demonstrate that RAP-ID achieves competitive performance with significant overall improvements compared to heuristic methods. Crucially, as a train-free solution, it incurs minimal computational overhead and delivers fast response times, making it well-suited for real-time deployment.

Abstract:
Evaluation is important for multimodal generation tasks, while traditional multimodal evaluation metrics suffer from several limitations. With the rapid progress of MLLMs, there is growing interest in applying MLLMs to build general evaluation systems. However, existing researches often simply collect large-scale evaluation data for training, while overlooking the quality of evaluation data. What’s more, current proposed evaluation models often struggle to achieve consistently strong performance across both image-to-text (I2T) and text-to-image (T2I) tasks. In this paper, through rigorous quality control strategies, we construct a comprehensive multimodal evaluation dataset, Minos-57K, with evaluation samples across 15 datasets, for developing the multimodal evaluation model Minos with SFT and preference alignment training strategies. Notably, despite using less than half the scale of the training data of prior work, our model achieves state-of-the-art evaluation performance across 16 out-of-domain datasets covering both I2T and T2I tasks among all open-source multimodal evaluation models and remain competitive with closed-source models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the importance of leveraging quality control process, jointly training on evaluation data from both I2T and T2I generation tasks and further preference alignment.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to be effective in eliciting structured reasoning (i.e., CoT reasoning) from large language models (LLMs). Regardless of its popularity, recent studies expose its failures in some reasoning tasks, raising fundamental questions about the nature of CoT reasoning. In this work, we propose a data distribution lens to understand when and why CoT reasoning succeeds or fails. We hypothesize that CoT reasoning reflects a structured inductive bias learned from in-distribution data, enabling models to conditionally generate reasoning trajectories that approximate those observed during training. As such, the effectiveness of CoT reasoning is fundamentally governed by the nature and degree of distribution discrepancy between training data and test queries. Guided by this lens, we dissect CoT reasoning via three dimensions: task, length, and format. To test the hypothesis, we introduce DataAlchemy, an abstract and fully controllable environment that trains LLMs from scratch and systematically probes them under various distribution conditions. Through rigorous controlled experiments, we reveal that CoT reasoning is a brittle mirage when it is pushed beyond training distributions, emphasizing the ongoing challenge of achieving genuine and generalizable reasoning.

Abstract:
Recently, large language models (LLMs) and reasoning large language models (RLLMs) have gained considerable attention from many researchers. RLLMs enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs through Long Chain-of-Thought (Long CoT) processes, significantly improving the performance of LLMs in addressing complex problems. However, there are few works that systematically explore what methods can fully unlock the performance of LLMs and RLLMs within the financial domain. To investigate the impact of various methods on LLMs and RLLMs, we utilize five LLMs and four RLLMs to assess the effects of prompting methods, agentic frameworks, and multilingual alignment methods on financial question-answering tasks. Our research findings indicate: (1) Current prompting methods and agent frameworks enhance the performance of LLMs in financial question answering by simulating Long CoT; (2) RLLMs possess inherent Long CoT capabilities, which limits the effectiveness of conventional methods in further enhancing their performance; (3) Current advanced multilingual alignment methods primarily improve the multilingual performance of LLMs by extending the reasoning length, which yields minimal benefits for RLLMs. Additionally, we discuss strategies for enhancing the performance of LLMs and RLLMs in financial question answering, which may serve as a inspiration for future improvements. We hope that this study can serve as an important reference for LLMs and RLLMs in the field of financial question answering.

Abstract:
While recent studies have increasingly emphasized the role of reflection in code repair tasks, existing benchmarks still target the repair generation capability of LLMs, lacking fine-grained evaluation of reflection generation capability. To this end, we propose Code Reffix, a benchmark featuring an automated pipeline with oracle reflections and a dual-task protocol to decouple the evaluation of reflection from repair. Through extensive experiments on 14 LLMs and fine-tuning analysis, we aim to pinpoint performance bottlenecks of code repair, quantify reflection quality, and verify the value of reflection optimization. Evaluations reveal that underperforming reflection capabilities of small-scale LLMs remain a major bottleneck for code repair. By quantifying this gap, Code Reffix provides a critical foundation for optimizing LLMs to achieve superior repair performance.

Abstract:
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated significant potential in the medical domain, achieving impressive performance on tasks ranging from report generation to visual question answering. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on static evaluation, assessing models on isolated data points. This approach neglects a critical aspect of clinical practice: longitudinal analysis, where physicians interpret patient data as a dynamic trajectory to track disease progression and treatment response. To address this gap, we introduce ELTLM, the first benchmark specifically tailored to assess the temporal perception and reasoning capabilities of medical LMMs. Constructed from temporal chest X-rays, ELTLM features a hierarchical task taxonomy comprising Temporal Perception QA and Temporal Reasoning QA, requiring models to detect fine-grained visual changes and infer high-level clinical trends. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models reveals that while they excel in static scenarios, they struggle significantly with temporal grounding and consistency. ELTLM serves as a vital resource to identify these limitations and guide the development of future time-aware medical AI systems. Our data is available at [ELTLM](https://github.com/ChengFeng233/ELTLM-Bench).

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in perceptual tasks, yet they degrade in complex multi-hop reasoning under multi-player game settings with imperfect and deceptive information. In this paper, we pick up a representative multi-player task, Murder Mystery Games, which require to infer hidden truths based on partial clues provided by the roles of different intentions. To address this challenge, we propose a collaborative multi-agent framework for evaluating and synthesizing high-quality, role-driven multi-player game scripts, enabling fine-grained interaction patterns tailored to character identities (i.e., murderer vs. innocent). Our system generates rich multimodal contexts—including character backstories, visual/textual clues, and multi-hop reasoning chains—through coordinated agent interactions. We design a two-stage agent-monitored training strategy to enhance the reasoning ability of VLM: (1) Chain-of-Thought based fine-tuning on curated and synthetic datasets that model uncertainty and deception; (2) GRPO-based Reinforcement Learning with agent-monitored reward shaping, encouraging the model to develop character-specific reasoning behaviors and effective multi-modal multi-hop inference. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method significantly boosts the performance of VLM in narrative reasoning, hidden fact extraction, and deception-resilient understanding. Our contributions offer a scalable solution for training and evaluating VLMs under uncertain, adversarial, and socially complex conditions, laying the groundwork for future benchmarks in multimodal multi-hop reasoning under imperfect information.

Abstract:
Qualitative analysis is essential for studying complex social and behavioral phenomena, yet existing large language model (LLM) approaches face key limitations. Fully automated pipelines often compromise methodological rigor, while fully manual coding remains costly and labor-intensive. Although recent work emphasizes human–AI collaboration, existing multi-agent systems focus primarily on theme-level outputs, provide limited human oversight, and overlook fine-grained, data-level coding quality.We introduce CentaurTA , an iterative, self-improving human–agent framework for scalable thematic analysis. CentaurTA places humans in the loop to oversee and guide analysis, using expert feedback as a persistent learning signal to drive prompt-level refinement. By combining structured human feedback with rubric-based evaluation, CentaurTA provides fine-grained supervision for both open coding and theme construction while preserving methodological rigor. Experiments across multiple datasets, baselines, and LLM families show that CentaurTA improves coding alignment and transparency, highlighting the central role of human feedback in reliable qualitative analysis. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Tom-Owl/CentaurTA.

Abstract:
Current approaches for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) primarily leverage the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of parameter-heavy (Multimodal) LLMs for classification, overlooking autonomous multimodal sentiment reasoning generation in resource-constrained environments.In this paper, we focus on the Resource-Limited Joint Multimodal Sentiment Reasoning and Classification task, JMSRC, which simultaneously performs multimodal sentiment reasoning chain generation and sentiment classification only with a lightweight model.We propose a Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Distillation model, MulCoT-RD, designed for JMSRC that employs a "Teacher-Assistant-Student" distillation paradigm to address deployment constraints in resource-limited environments.We first leverage a high-performance Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to generate the initial reasoning dataset and train a medium-sized assistant model with a multi-task learning mechanism. A lightweight student model is jointly trained to perform efficient multimodal sentiment reasoning generation and classification.Extensive experiments on four datasets demonstrate that MulCoT-RD with only 3B parameters and achieves strong performance on JMSRC, while exhibiting robust generalization and enhanced interpretability.

Abstract:
The initial outpatient consultation is critical for clinical decision-making, yet it is often conducted by a single physician under time pressure, making it prone to cognitive biases and incomplete evidence capture. Although the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) reduces these risks, they are costly and difficult to scale to real-time intake. We propose Aegle, a synchronous virtual MDT framework that brings MDT-level reasoning to outpatient consultations via a graph-based multi-agent architecture. Aegle formalizes the consultation state using a structured SOAP representation, separating evidence collection from diagnostic reasoning to improve traceability and bias control. An orchestrator dynamically activates specialist agents, which perform decoupled parallel reasoning and are subsequently integrated by an aggregator into a coherent clinical note. Experiments on ClinicalBench and a real-world RAPID-IPN dataset across 24 departments and 53 metrics show that Aegle consistently outperforms state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source models in documentation quality and consultation capability.

Abstract:
Temporal knowledge graph embedding (TKGE) aims to model the temporal evolution of relational facts. However, existing approaches predominantly rely on discrete timestamp lookup tables and high-dimensional embedding spaces, which lack explicit structural constraints for continuous-time dynamics. As a result, temporal patterns are often captured through capacity scaling rather than principled dynamic modeling, leading to limited parameter efficiency and scalability.To address these limitations, we propose , a physics-inspired framework that embeds temporal dynamics into a symplectic phase space. Our model introduces a structure-preserving Hamiltonian evolution mechanism based on a pairwise-decoupled Hamiltonian generator and its Cayley transform, ensuring that temporal transformations adhere to the symplectic group Sp (2d) and preserve phase-space volume with linear computational complexity. In addition, we design a Time-Aware Parameter Modulation mechanism that integrates continuous Rotary Time Embeddings via Feature-wise Linear Modulation, enabling smooth temporal evolution while capturing event-driven variations. Theoretical analysis establishes the geometric validity of the proposed framework. Extensive experiments on standard TKGE benchmarks demonstrate that achieves competitive performance with substantially lower embedding dimensions. Furthermore, empirical results show that the proposed continuous Hamiltonian evolution facilitates generalization to unseen timestamps by learning transferable temporal dynamics from the underlying geometric structure.

Abstract:
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in automated psychological counseling. However, current research focuses on single-session counseling, which doesn’t represent real-world scenarios. In practice, psychological counseling is a process, not a one-time event, requiring sustained, multi-session engagement to progressively address clients’ issues. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a dataset for Multi-Session Psychological Counseling Conversation Dataset (Muspsy). Our Muspsy dataset is constructed using real client profiles from publicly available psychological case reports. It captures the dynamic arc of counseling, encompassing multiple progressive counseling conversations from the same client across different sessions. Leveraging our dataset, we also developed our Muspsy model, which aims to track client progress and adapt its counseling direction over time. Experiments show that our model performs better than baseline models across multiple sessions.

Abstract:
Due to the dynamically evolving nature of real-world query streams, relevance models struggle to generalize to practical search scenarios. A sophisticated solution is self-evolution techniques. However, in large-scale industrial settings with massive query streams, this technique faces two challenges: (1) informative samples are often sparse and difficult to identify, and (2) pseudo-labels generated by the current model could be unreliable. To address these challenges, in this work, we propose a Self-Evolving Relevance Model approach (SERM), which comprises two complementary multi-agent modules: a multi-agent sample miner, designed to detect distributional shifts and identify informative training samples, and a multi-agent relevance annotator, which provides reliable labels through a two-level agreement framework. We evaluated SERM on a large-scale industrial platform, which serves billions of user requests daily. Experimental results demonstrate that SERM can achieve significant performance gains through iterative self-evolution, as validated by extensive offline multilingual evaluations and online testing.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems based on Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a core technology for tasks such as question-answering (QA) and content generation. RAG poisoning is an attack method to induce LLMs to generate the attacker’s expected text by injecting poisoned documents into the database of RAG systems. Existing research can be broadly divided into two classes: white-box methods and black-box methods. White-box methods utilize gradient information to optimize poisoned documents, and black-box methods use a pre-trained LLM to generate them. However, existing white-box methods require knowledge of the RAG system’s internal composition and implementation details, whereas black-box methods are unable to utilize interactive information. In this work, we propose the RIPRAG attack framework, an end-to-end attack pipeline that treats the target RAG system as a black box and leverages our proposed Reinforcement Learning from Black-box Feedback (RLBF) method to optimize the generation model for poisoned documents. We designed two kinds of rewards: similarity reward and attack reward. Experimental results demonstrate that this method can effectively execute poisoning attacks against most complex RAG systems, achieving an attack success rate (ASR) improvement of up to 0.72 compared to baseline methods. This highlights prevalent deficiencies in current defensive methods and provides critical insights for LLM security research.

Abstract:
Tool graphs (TG) model dependencies among tools and resources, enabling more structured organization and management of large toolsets. However, existing methods and benchmarks often formulate tool learning (TL) as a single-solution setting, overlooking the fact that many tasks admit multiple valid tool combinations and therefore require optimal solution selection. Moreover, exploring large-scale TG is computationally expensive, especially under constrained context budgets. To address these challenges, we propose TOPT, an efficient framework for learning optimal TL policies over large TG, as well as construct MultiSoTLBench, a large-scale Multi-Solution TL Benchmark, where each task admits multiple valid solutions. Specifically, to improve search efficiency in large action spaces, TOPT adopts a progressive graph expansion strategy: we train a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to acquire transferable expansion skills and construct, on demand, a compact solvable subgraph that preserves only task-relevant links. This reduces the size of the candidate space and the context usage from the outset. To enable optimal selection, we further propose a progressive graph reasoning framework. It performs RL-driven optimality analysis and scheduling on the expanded subgraph to generate an optimal tool chain that balances path length and tool cost. Comprehensive experiments on MultiSoTLBench demonstrate that TOPT generalizes effectively, improving task success and solution optimality by 46.21% and 66.34%, respectively.

Abstract:
While current LLM agents utilizing paradigms like ReAct or Plan-and-Solve have established a strong foundation for step-by-step reasoning, they remain brittle in open-ended environments due to two intrinsic limitations: (1) A closed action space: These frameworks are confined to static, pre-defined toolsets, rendering them unable to adapt when required tools are missing or obsolete. (2) Myopic error recovery: Existing agents often get trapped in repetitive local retries, failing to diagnose and rectify root causes within the high-level plan. To overcome these limitations, we introduce CAR (Create And Replan), a novel architecture that incorporates a meta-tool synthesizer to dynamically augment the action space and a reflective replanning mechanism to revise global strategies. To rigorously evaluate our approach, we release ToolHop-Pro, a diagnostic benchmark with systematically pruned toolsets to simulate tool scarcity. Experiments demonstrate that CAR significantly outperforms representative baselines, validating its superior robustness where static agents fail. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Zaiz-77/car.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong performance enhancement through scaling test time computation, but due to the inherent limitations of the underlying language models, they still have shortcomings in tasks that require precise computation and extensive knowledge reserves. Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising paradigm that incorporates tool call and execution within the reasoning trajectory. Although recent works have released some powerful open-source TIR models, our analysis reveals that these models still suffer from critical deficiencies. We find that when the reasoning of the model conflicts with the tool results, the model tends to believe in its own reasoning. And there are cases where the tool results are correct but are ignored by the model, resulting in incorrect answers, which we define as “Tool Ignored”. This indicates that the model does not know when to trust or ignore the tool. To overcome these limitations, We introduce Adaptive Tool Trust Calibration (ATTC), a novel framework that guides the model to adaptively choose to trust or ignore the tool results based on the confidence score of generated code blocks. The experimental results from various open-source TIR models of different sizes and across multiple datasets demonstrate that ATTC effectively reduces the "Tool Ignored" issue, resulting in a performance increase of 4.1% to 7.5%.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning ability of large language models. However, widely used RLVR algorithms, such as GRPO, often suffer from entropy collapse, leading to premature determinism and unstable optimization. Existing remedies, including entropy regularization and ratio-based clipping heuristics, either control entropy in a coarse-grained manner or rely on approximate on-policy training. In this paper, we revisit entropy collapse from a token-level entropy flow perspective. Our analysis reveals that entropy-decreasing tokens consistently outweigh entropy-increasing ones, resulting in a severely imbalanced entropy flow. This perspective provides a unified explanation of entropy collapse in existing RLVR algorithms and highlights the importance of balancing entropy dynamics. Motivated by this analysis, we propose On-Policy Entropy Flow Optimization (OPEFO), an adaptive entropy flow balancing mechanism that rescales entropy-increasing and entropy-decreasing updates according to their contributions to entropy change, while remaining strict on-policy. Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that OPEFO improves training stability and final performance. We will release the code and models upon publication.

Abstract:
Extending large language models (LLMs) to low-resource languages often incurs an “align- ment tax”: improvements in the target lan- guage come at the cost of catastrophic forget- ting in general capabilities. We argue that this trade-off arises from the rigidity of supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which enforces token-level surface imitation on narrow and biased data distributions. To address this limitation, we propose a semantic-space alignment paradigm powered by Group Relative Policy Optimiza- tion (GRPO), where the model is optimized us- ing embedding-level semantic rewards rather than likelihood maximization. This objective encourages meaning preservation through flex- ible realizations, enabling controlled updates that reduce destructive interference with pre- trained knowledge. We evaluate our approach on Tibetan–Chinese machine translation and Ti- betan headline generation. Experiments show that our method acquires low-resource capa- bilities while markedly mitigating alignment tax, preserving general competence more effec- tively than SFT. Despite producing less rigid surface overlap, semantic RL yields higher se- mantic quality and preference in open-ended generation, and few-shot transfer results indi- cate that it learns more transferable and ro- bust representations under limited supervision. Overall, our study demonstrates that reinforce- ment learning with semantic rewards provides a safer and more reliable pathway for inclusive low-resource language expansion.

Abstract:
Reasoning ability has become a defining capability of Large Language Models (LLMs), with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) emerging as a key paradigm to enhance it. However, RLVR training often suffers from policy entropy collapse, where the policy becomes overly deterministic, hindering exploration and limiting reasoning performance. While entropy regularization is a common remedy, its effectiveness is highly sensitive to the fixed coefficient, making it unstable across tasks and models. In this work, we revisit entropy regularization in RLVR and argue that its potential has been largely underestimated. Our analysis shows that (i) tasks of varying difficulty demand distinct exploration intensities, and (ii) balanced exploration may require the policy entropy to be maintained within a moderate range below its initial level. Therefore, we propose Adaptive Entropy Regularization (AER) — a framework that dynamically balances exploration and exploitation via three components: difficulty-aware coefficient allocation, initial-anchored target entropy, and dynamic global coefficient adjustment. Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that AER consistently outperforms baselines, improving both reasoning accuracy and exploration capability. Codes are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/AER-ACL .

Abstract:
Recent advances have shown that multimodal large language models (MLLMs) benefit from multimodal interleaved chain-of-thought (CoT) with vision tool interactions. However, existing open-source models often exhibit blind tool-use reasoning patterns, invoking vision tools even when they are unnecessary, which significantly increases inference overhead and degrades model performance. To this end, we propose AdaTooler-V, an MLLM that performs adaptive tool-use by determining whether a visual problem truly requires tools. First, we introduce AT-GRPO, a reinforcement learning algorithm that adaptively adjusts reward scales based on the Tool Benefit Score of each sample, encouraging the model to invoke tools only when they provide genuine improvements. Moreover, we construct two datasets to support training: AdaTooler-V-CoT-100k for SFT cold start and AdaTooler-V-300k for RL with verifiable rewards across single-image, multi-image, and video data. Experiments across twelve benchmarks demonstrate the strong reasoning capability of AdaTooler-V, outperforming existing methods in diverse visual reasoning tasks. Notably, AdaTooler-V-7B achieves an accuracy of 89.8% on the high-resolution benchmark V, surpassing the commercial proprietary model GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro.

Abstract:
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general visual understanding, they frequently falter in fine-grained perception tasks that require identifying tiny objects or discerning subtle visual relationships. We attribute this limitation to Visual Attenuation: a phenomenon where sparse fine-grained visual signals are prematurely suppressed or diluted by dominant textual tokens during network propagation, resulting in a “loss of focus” during the deep-level decision-making process. Existing input-centric solutions fail to fundamentally reverse this intrinsic mechanism of information loss. To address this challenge, we propose the Variational Information Flow (VIF) framework. Adopting a probabilistic perspective, VIF leverages a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) to model the visual saliency relevant to the question-answer pair as a latent distribution. As a plug-and-play module, VIF can be integrated into existing architectures. Extensive evaluations across diverse benchmarks—covering General VQA, fine-grained perception, and visual grounding—demonstrate that VIF yields competitive improvements over previous methods, validating its effectiveness in enhancing the fine-grained perception of MLLMs. Codes are available at https://github.com/ictnlp/VIF.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly deployed as research agents for deep search and long-horizon information seeking, yet their performance often degrades as interaction histories grow. This degradation, known as context rot, reflects a failure to maintain coherent and task-relevant internal states over extended reasoning horizons. Existing approaches primarily manage context through raw accumulation or passive summarization, treating it as a static artifact and allowing early errors or misplaced emphasis to persist. Motivated by this perspective, we propose ARC, which is the first framework to systematically formulate context management as an active, reflection-driven process that treats context as a dynamic internal reasoning state during execution. ARC operationalizes this view through reflection-driven monitoring and revision, allowing agents to actively reorganize their working context when misalignment or degradation is detected. Experiments on challenging long-horizon information-seeking benchmarks show that ARC consistently outperforms passive context compression methods, achieving up to an 11% absolute improvement in accuracy on BrowseComp-ZH with Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models face severe challenges in computational efficiency and memory consumption due to the substantial expansion of the visual KV cache when processing long visual contexts. Existing KV cache compression methods typically rely on the "persistence of importance" hypothesis to prune tokens. However, this approach proves fragile in multimodal settings due to two key issues: 1) Visual tokens display "deferred importance," initially exhibiting low salience but becoming pivotal during later decoding, which can lead to premature eviction. 2) Discrete pruning disrupts the inherent spatial continuity of visual cues. To address these challenges, we propose RetentiveKV, an entropy-driven KV cache optimization method that reformulates KV eviction from "discrete context truncation" to "continuous memory evolution" based on State Space Models. Our method leverages information entropy to quantify the information potential of low-attention tokens and integrates tokens scheduled for eviction into a continuous state space through entropy-guided state transitions, enabling their dynamic reactivation when semantic relevance arises during subsequent decoding. Extensive experiments on multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that RetentiveKV achieves 5.0 × KV cache compression and 1.5 × decoding acceleration.

Abstract:
Despite the adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in legal AI, automated contract revision remains impeded because generic models often treat strict legal constraints as mere suggestions. To address this safety gap, we introduce the Risk-Constrained Bilevel Stackelberg Framework (RCBSF), modeling high-stakes revision as a rigorous strategic interaction rather than an open-ended conversation. RCBSF establishes a hierarchical Leader-Follower structure: a Global Prescriptive Agent (GPA) leader imposes definitive risk budgets, while a follower system—comprising a Constrained Revision Agent (CRA) and a Local Verification Agent (LVA)—iteratively optimizes the output within these strict boundaries. We theoretically prove this bilevel formulation converges to an equilibrium yielding strictly superior utility over unguided methods. Empirically, RCBSF achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing iterative baselines with an average Risk Resolution Rate (RRR) of 84.21% and enhanced token efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/xjiacs/RCBSF .

Abstract:
Great novels create immersive worlds with rich character arcs, well-structured plots, and nuanced writing styles. However, current novel generation methods often rely on brief, simplistic story outlines and generate details using plain, generic language.To bridge this gap, we introduce the task of Imitative Novel Generation , which requires the generated novels to imitate the distinctive features of the original work, including understanding character profiles and world views, predicting plausible plot developments, and writing concrete details using vivid, expressive language.To achieve this, we propose WriterAgent, a novel generation system designed to master the core aspects of literary imitative.WriterAgent is trained through a curriculum learning paradigm, progressing from low-level stylistic mastery to high-level narrative coherence. Its key tasks include language style learning, character modeling, plot planning, and stylish writing, ensuring comprehensive narrative control.To support this, WriterAgent leverages the WriterLoRA framework, an extension of LoRA with hierarchical and cumulative task-specific modules, each specializing in a different narrative aspect. We evaluate WriterAgent on multilingual classics like Harry Potter and Dream of the Red Chamber , demonstrating its superiority over baselines in capturing the target author’s settings, character dynamics, and writing style to produce coherent, faithful narratives.We hope this work inspires literary creativity in NLP: WriterAgent .

Abstract:
Tool calling requires Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate structured decisions including tool names and schema-constrained arguments, where small decoding mistakes can cause hard failures. Existing methods either rely on costly tool-use training data or only constrain syntax, leaving tool selection and argument value errors largely unsolved. We analyze tool calling failures through a Where–When lens: (Where) failures correlate with persistent uncertainty in late transformer layers, (When) uncertainty concentrates on content-bearing tokens (tool names and argument values) rather than schema tokens. Based on this, and motivated by evidence that transformer Feed Forward Networks (FFNs) act as key–value style memories that store and retrieve factual or associative mappings, we propose Memory Space Tool Retracing (MemTR), a weight-free decoding-time method that retrieves relevant tool evidence from the tool library and mixes it into the FFN-output at the uncertain layer, treating FFNs as key–value memories. Through extensive experiments on various model families (Qwen, Llama, and xLAM) and benchmarks (BFCL, ACEBench, APIBank), MemTR reduces tool calling failures by 2%–9% with only 1%–2% runtime overhead, without any fine-tuning or additional tool-use training data.

Abstract:
Quantization is widely adopted to reduce the computational cost of large language models (LLMs); however, its implications for fairness and safety, particularly in dynamic quantization and multilingual contexts, remain underexplored. In this work, we conduct a systematic study of how static and dynamic quantization methods impact fairness and safety across benchmarks measuring intrinsic and extrinsic bias and safety alignment. For fairness, we evaluate English, French, Dutch, Spanish, and Turkish; for safety, we focus on English, Korean, and Arabic. Our findings reveal that quantization consistently degrades fairness and safety, with dynamic methods demonstrating greater stability than static ones. Moreover, fairness degradation varies across languages, while safety deterioration is especially pronounced in non-English settings. To address these risks, we introduce Critical Weight Protection, a novel technique that identifies and preserves fairness- and safety-critical weights during quantization. This approach mitigates bias and safety deterioration without costly retraining or alignment, maintaining trustworthiness while retaining efficiency.

Abstract:
Recent preference optimization algorithms such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have become prevalent for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. FocalPO improves upon DPO by introducing a modulating factor that down-weighs misranked preference pairs. However, using a fixed modulating factor throughout training is suboptimal, as the model’s learning capacity evolves during training. We introduce DynamicFocalPO, which employs a dynamic focusing strategy that adapts over the course of training. Inspired by curriculum learning, our method initially focuses on correctly ranked samples to establish a solid foundation, then gradually incorporates harder samples as training progresses. Experiments demonstrate that DynamicFocalPO surpasses both DPO and FocalPO on benchmarks including Alpaca Eval 2.0 and Arena-Hard using Mistral-Base-7B and Llama-3-Instruct-8B. We further provide theoretical analysis showing that the dynamic schedule enables adaptive entropy regularization and selective gradient suppression.

Abstract:
Optimizing communication topology is fundamental to the efficiency and effectiveness of Large Language Model (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). While recent approaches utilize reinforcement learning to dynamically construct task-specific graphs, they typically rely on single-sample policy gradients with absolute rewards (e.g., binary correctness). This paradigm suffers from severe gradient variance and the credit assignment problem: simple queries yield non-informative positive rewards for suboptimal structures, while difficult queries often result in failures that provide no learning signal. To address these challenges, we propose Graph-GRPO, a novel topology optimization framework that integrates Group Relative Policy Optimization. Instead of evaluating a single topology in isolation, Graph-GRPO samples a group of diverse communication graphs for each query and computes the advantage of specific edges based on their relative performance within the group. By normalizing rewards across the sampled group, our method effectively mitigates the noise derived from task difficulty variance and enables fine-grained credit assignment. Extensive experiments on reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that Graph-GRPO significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving superior training stability and identifying critical communication pathways previously obscured by reward noise.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has accelerated progress toward universal AI assistants. However, existing benchmarks for personalized assistants remain misaligned with real-world user-assistant interactions, failing to capture the complexity of external contexts and users’ cognitive states. To bridge this gap, we propose LifeSim , a user simulator that models user cognition through the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model within physical environments for coherent life trajectories generation, and simulates intention-driven user interactive behaviors. Based on LifeSim, we introduce LifeSim-Eval , a comprehensive benchmark for multi-scenario, long-horizon personalized assistance. LifeSim-Eval covers 8 life domains and 1,200 diverse scenarios, and adopts a multi-turn interactive method to assess models’ abilities to complete explicit and implicit intentions, recover user profiles, and produce high-quality responses. Under both single-scenario and long-horizon settings, our experiments reveal that current LLMs face significant limitations in handling implicit intention and long-term user preference modeling.

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) from simple assistants to versatile agents, effective personalization remains a significant challenge. Existing approaches often treat user preferences as static or merely time-varying traits, overlooking the dynamic nature of human behavior: preferences can shift, and even conflict, depending on context. To address this limitation, we propose a fine-grained taxonomy to differentiate between stable preferences, which are context-agnostic, and situational preferences, which are context-dependent. Building on this taxonomy, we introduce S2Pref , a new dataset of 10k meticulously curated entries. Each entry is grounded in a multi-turn dialogue that implicitly manifests either a stable or a situational preference, as defined by our hierarchical taxonomy. We further design three complementary evaluation tasks to benchmark LLMs on their ability to prioritize contextual signals, proactively resolve ambiguity, and efficiently infer user preferences. Our dataset and diagnostic tasks provide a practical testbed for advancing dynamic, context-aware personalization in conversational agents.

Abstract:
Document summarization becomes more challenging when summaries must reflect a user’s subjective interests in addition to document salience. SOTA Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong in-context summarization capabilities. Prior works report that simply prepending long and dynamically evolving user histories leads to unstable, inconsistent personalization. To address this, we introduce PerDucer, a personalization inducer for frozen language models. Given a user interaction sequence (trajectory) and a query document, PerDucer first predicts the next likely preference signal. It then maps the latent signal to a small set of personalized keyphrases for the query document. These keyphrases serve as the control cues that steer the frozen summarizers (both LLMs and SLMs) towards user-aligned summaries. Across the PENS and OpenAI-Reddit benchmarks, PerDucer-boosted LLMs consistently outperform the strongest history-prompting baselines, yielding an average +0.18 improvement across personalization metrics (PerSEval in our case). Two PerDucer-augmented SLMs approach the top-performing evaluated LLM, with SmolLM2-1.7B reaching 97% of the best-performing DeepSeek-R1-14B score. These results indicate that short keyphrase cues can induce personalization in frozen summarizers without modifying their parameters.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on idiom identification benchmarks, yet their robustness to misleading contextual signals remains largely untested. We introduce ID10M-JAM, an adversarial extension of the ID10M dataset designed to jam model understanding by injecting coherent but conflicting context before each target sentence. For every sentence containing a potential idiomatic expression (PIE), we construct variants that deliberately invert contextual expectations: placing literal cues before idiomatic uses and idiomatic cues before literal ones. All variants are validated by human annotators to ensure naturalness and unambiguous interpretation for human readers. ID10M-JAM exposes systematic vulnerabilities in LLMs’ contextual reasoning, pushing idiom identification to its breaking point.

Abstract:
Long-context LLM agents increasingly serve multiple users or personas within a single session, requiring stable identity and knowledge boundaries under frequent switching. We identify a common failure mode, identity drift, where models conflate user-specific states and leak information across roles. On BEAM-SWITCH, a benchmark for controlled multi-user switching, performance consistently degrades as switching intensifies, even when responses remain fluent and locally coherent. We propose MENTOR, a cognitive architecture that mitigates identity drift without fine-tuning. MENTOR uses a Dual-Chain Memory Mechanism: a Global Chain ( 𝒢 ) for long-term event logging and isolated Role Chains ( ℛ r ) as per-role working memories, supported by a semantic Knowledge Graph ( 𝒦 ) that filters and verifies role-admissible information before generation. Across six LLM families, MENTOR improves the overall score (Avg) from 0.46 to 0.75 on average (+0.29 absolute), with substantial gains in identity adherence and knowledge fidelity.

Abstract:
Current Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance on medical benchmarks. However, models that excel in standardized tests focused on medical knowledge recall are not necessarily effective in real-world healthcare scenarios. This disparity between academic performance and clinical effectiveness stems from existing evaluations focusing overly on knowledge retrieval and QA, while neglecting high-load executive tasks in real clinical workflows. The effective execution of such tasks depends not only on model reasoning but also on the overall digital maturity of the healthcare institution. To address this, we propose a “Capability-Based Hospital AI Maturity Model” framework. This framework establishes a layered maturity system based on capabilities. By categorizing hospital AI capabilities into distinct maturity levels, it provides a clear, stepwise evolutionary path for hospitals, guiding them from foundational infrastructure construction to ubiquitous intelligence. Guided by this framework, we constructed ten representative real-world clinical scenarios as a reference test set and compared the performance of multiple models across benchmarks and real-world scenarios. Preliminary results suggest that, compared to relying solely on academic benchmark scores, this maturity assessment mode—which integrates system governance and scenario constraints—may provide a more valuable basis for AI adoption in medical institutions.

Abstract:
Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG) is effective for knowledge-intensive and multi-hop query tasks; however, many existing methods primarily seed entity-based graphs and rely on implicit semantic relevance propagation. This often (i) under-retrieves when user queries are abstract and semantically sparse at the entity level, and (ii) suffers from brittle multi-hop reasoning, where noisy activations can derail entity-to-entity transitions and corrupt the inferred relation chain, yielding unreliable conclusions. To this end, we propose FlowRAG , a semantic-aware retrieval framework that improves both semantic recall and explicit reasoning. Specifically, FlowRAG constructs a quad-level heterogeneous graph over passages, summaries, sentences, and entities, where summary nodes serve as a coarse semantic hub. At retrieval time, a dual-granularity activation module combines summary–query alignment with sentence-level matching to activate relevant entities under paraphrase and abstraction robustly. We then introduce a frequency-aware weighted flow module that routes relevance through entity–passage links weighted by within-passage term frequency, pruning noisy connections and extracting high-confidence reasoning paths as an explicit logic skeleton for generation. Extensive experiments show that FlowRAG obtains state-of-the-art performance on complex reasoning benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models exhibit degraded performance when extrapolating beyond training context lengths. Existing training-free methods like positional reuse or interpolation can alleviate this issue in an efficient manner. However, these strategies are semantics-agnostic by only considering relative token distances, which could indiscriminately blur semantically relevant and irrelevant tokens alike.To address this, we introduce an adaptive positional zooming method called Relevance-Informed Positional Resource Allocation (RiPRA). RiPRA formulates positional encoding as a constrained resource allocation, in which a fixed positional budget is distributed across tokens in a longer context based on their semantic relevance to the query: relevant tokens get higher positional resolution, while irrelevant tokens (positions) are compressed. By doing this, RiPRA enables a dynamic and nonparametric positional zooming where the positional resolution is adaptively modulated across queries and network layers, effectively improving long-range context modeling and retrieval capacity. Besides, an isotonic smoothing is used to further enforce a global linear ordering relationship to preserve stability and generalization, together with a chunk-based hierarchical approximation to further reduce inference overhead. Extensive experiments across comprehensive benchmarks including LongBench, L-Eval, Passkey Retrieval, and PG19 demonstrate that RiPRA consistently outperforms existing training-free extrapolation methods, showing the value of relevance-conditioned positional encoding for long-context generalization.

Abstract:
Although post-training quantization (PTQ) provides an efficient numerical compression scheme for deploying large language models (LLMs) on resource-constrained devices, the representativeness and universality of calibration data remain a core bottleneck in determining the accuracy of quantization parameters. Traditional PTQ methods typically rely on limited samples, making it difficult to capture the activation distribution during the inference phase, leading to biases in quantization parameters. To address this, we propose FAQ (Family-Aware Quantization), a calibration data regeneration framework that leverages prior knowledge from LLMs of the same family to generate high-fidelity calibration samples. Specifically, FAQ first inputs the original calibration samples into a larger LLM from the same family as the target model, regenerating a series of high-fidelity calibration data using a highly consistent knowledge system. Subsequently, this data, carrying Chain-of-Thought reasoning and conforming to the expected activation distribution, undergoes group competition under expert guidance to select the best samples, which are then re-normalized to enhance the effectiveness of standard PTQ. Experiments on multiple model series, including Qwen3-8B, show that FAQ reduces accuracy loss by up to 28.5% compared to the baseline with original calibration data, demonstrating its powerful potential and contribution.

Abstract:
Personalized glucose regulation remains a central yet unresolved challenge in precision nutrition, as postprandial glucose response varies substantially across individuals. Existing approaches based on glycemic indices fail to adequately account for such heterogeneity and lack the mechanism to dynamically adjust meals based on personal physiological feedback. In this context, recent advances in LLM-based agents offer a promising direction, as they enable context-aware reasoning and iterative refinement. Inspired by this, we propose a physio-feedback agentic loop, a unified system that integrates individualized absorption modeling with dietary intervention to regulate glucose response. Specifically, we develop a Physiology-Aware Glucose Predictor to model individualized absorption dynamics through a learnable Temporal Physiological Absorption Decay Module. We then construct a Prediction-Driven Two-Stage Meal Optimization Agent that iteratively refines real-world meals using predicted outcomes as explicit feedback. Through extensive experiments on multiple public datasets, we demonstrate that our method not only improves prediction accuracy but also effectively reduces glucose excursions. To the best of our knowledge, this paper marks the first step in integrating physiological learning with an LLM-based agent for personalized glucose regulation.

Abstract:
Sequential diagnosis requires balancing diagnostic accuracy against resource costs through iterative information gathering. Existing Large Language Model (LLM) approaches exhibit a critical knowledge-reasoning gap: despite encoding extensive medical knowledge, they struggle to reason systematically under cost constraints, often resorting to excessive testing. We propose GraphDx, a knowledge-enhanced framework with two core innovations. First, we design an automated pipeline that leverages LLMs to construct Medical Diagnosis Knowledge Graphs (MDKGs) with quantized typicality, action-centric topology, and dual-objective attributes for both diagnostic relevance and cost-sensitivity. Second, we introduce three collaborative agents (Perception, Reasoning, and Decision) where the Perception and Decision Agents handle language understanding and generation, while the Reasoning Agent performs deterministic evidence scoring and cost-aware planning on the MDKG. Experiments on MedQA and MIMIC-IV across three LLM backbones (DeepSeek-V3, Kimi-k2, Llama-3.3) show that GraphDx improves diagnostic success rates from 50–68% to 79–93% while reducing test costs by 20–54%, providing a robust, economical, and interpretable solution for automated clinical diagnosis.

Abstract:
As older adults increasingly use LLM-based chatbots for companionship and assistance, a safety gap is emerging. Older adults may face vulnerabilities from social isolation, limited digital literacy, and cognitive decline, yet existing safety benchmarks largely target general harms and overlook elderly-specific risks. For example, a prompt such as “how to repair a ceiling light alone in the dark” may be benign for most users but poses a serious fall risk for older adults with mobility limitations.We introduce GrandGuard, the first comprehensive framework for assessing and mitigating elderly-specific contextual risks in LLM interactions. We develop a three-level taxonomy with 50 fine-grained risk types across mental well-being, financial, medical, toxicity, and privacy domains, grounded in real-world incidents, community discussions, and analysis of stakeholder studies. Using this taxonomy, we construct a benchmark of 10,404 labeled prompts and responses, showing that several leading LLMs mishandle elderly-specific contextual risks in over 50% of cases. We mitigate these failures with two safeguards: a fine-tuned Llama-Guard-3 and a policy-enhanced gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, achieving up to 96.2% and 90.9% unsafe-prompt detection accuracy, respectively. GrandGuard lays the groundwork for AI systems that move beyond general safety to support aging populations.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential in recommendation systems but suffer from prohibitive inference latency. Existing distillation approaches typically target Small Language Models (SLMs) or Conventional Recommendation Models (CRMs), face a critical trade-off between computational cost and semantic reasoning capacity. To bridge this accuracy-efficiency gap, we introduce Reasoning-to-Encoder Distillation (R2END), a framework that establishes a text encoder as the optimal student architecture for scalable recommendation. Unlike methods that mimic token generation, R2END compresses the teacher’s reasoning into a dense vector space via a semantic alignment objective, effectively capturing user-item dynamics. Extensive experiments on four datasets demonstrate that R2END not only outperforms state-of-the-art baselines but also achieves drastically reduced latency, offering a sweet spot for recommendation.

Abstract:
Automatic evaluation metrics are central to the development of machine translation systems, yet their robustness under domain shift remains unclear. Most metrics are developed on the Workshop on Machine Translation (WMT) benchmarks, raising concerns about their robustness to unseen domains. Prior studies that analyze unseen domains vary translation systems, annotators, or evaluation conditions, confounding domain effects with human annotation noise.To address these biases, we introduce a systematic multi-annotator Cross-Domain Error-Span-Annotation dataset (CD-ESA), comprising 18.8k human error span annotations across three language pairs, where we fix annotators within each language pair and evaluate translations of the same six translation systems across one seen news domain and two unseen technical domains. Using this dataset, we first find that automatic metrics appear surprisingly robust to domain-shifts at the segment level (up to 0.69 agreement), but this robustness largely disappears once we account for human label variation. Averaging annotations increases inter-annotator agreement by up to +0.11. Metrics struggle on the unseen chemical domain compared to humans (inter-annotator agreement of 0.78–0.83 vs. 0.96).We recommend comparing metric–human agreement against inter-annotator agreement, rather than comparing raw metric–human agreement alone, when evaluating across different domains.

Abstract:
Verifiers have been demonstrated to enhance LLM reasoning via test-time scaling (TTS). Yet, they face significant challenges in complex domains. Error propagation from incorrect intermediate reasoning can lead to false positives for seemingly plausible solutions, while lacking external grounding makes verifiers unreliable on computation or knowledge-intensive tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Agentic Verifier, a framework that transforms reward modeling into a multi-turn, tool-augmented deliberative process. We introduce complementary forward and backward agents: one traces solutions from premises to conclusions, while the other re-checks conclusions against their underlying premises. This bidirectional process enables a comprehensive, reliable, and interpretable assessment of solutions. To facilitate practical deployment, we propose AgentV-RL. Through proactive exploration and reinforcement learning, the verifier autonomously interleaves tool-use with internal reasoning. Extensive experiments show that Agentic Verifier yields consistent performance gains under both parallel and sequential TTS. Notably, our 4B variant surpasses state-of-the-art ORMs by 25.2%, positioning it as a promising paradigm for agentic reward modeling.

Abstract:
Multi-role dialogue summarization requires modeling complex interactions among multiple speakers while preserving role-specific information and factual consistency. However, most existing methods optimize for automatic metrics such as ROUGE and BERTScore, which favor surface-level imitation of references rather than genuine gains in faithfulness or alignment with human preferences. We propose a novel framework that couples explicit cognitive-style reasoning with reward-based optimization for multi-role dialogue summarization. Our method first distills structured reasoning traces (e.g., step-by-step inferences and intermediate reflections) from a large teacher model and uses them as auxiliary supervision to initialize a reasoning-aware summarizer via staged supervised fine-tuning. It then applies GRPO with a dual-principle reward that blends metric-based signals with human-aligned criteria targeting key information coverage, implicit inference, factual faithfulness, and conciseness. Experiments on multilingual multi-role dialogue benchmarks show that our method matches strong baselines on ROUGE and BERTScore. Specifically, results on CSDS confirm the framework’s stability in semantic consistency, while in-depth analysis on SAMSum demonstrates clear gains in factual faithfulness and model-based preference alignment. These findings underscore the value of reasoning-aware and preference-aware training for reliable dialogue summarization. Code will be made accessible upon acceptance, checkpoints and datasets are now available at https://huggingface.co/NebulaPixel.

Abstract:
With the advancement of powerful large-scale reasoning models, effectively evaluating the reasoning capabilities of these models has become increasingly important. However, existing benchmarks designed to assess the reasoning abilities of large models tend to be limited in scope and lack the flexibility to adapt their difficulty according to the evolving reasoning capacities of the models. To address this, we propose MorphoBench, a benchmark that incorporates multidisciplinary questions to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large models and can adjust and update question difficulty based on the reasoning abilities of advanced models. Specifically, we curate the benchmark by selecting and collecting complex reasoning questions from existing benchmarks and sources such as Olympiad-level competitions. Additionally, MorphoBench adaptively modifies the analytical challenge of questions by leveraging key statements generated during the model’s reasoning process. Furthermore, it includes questions generated using simulation software, enabling dynamic adjustment of benchmark difficulty with minimal resource consumption. We have gathered over 1,300 test questions and iteratively adjusted the difficulty of MorphoBench based on the reasoning capabilities of models such as GPT-5 and Gemini-3-Pro. MorphoBench enhances the comprehensiveness and validity of model reasoning evaluation, providing reliable guidance for improving both the reasoning abilities and scientific robustness of large models.

Abstract:
A core challenge for faithful LLM role-playing is sustaining consistent characterization throughout long, open-ended dialogues, as models frequently fail to recall and accurately apply their designated persona knowledge without explicit cues. To tackle this, we propose the Memory-Driven Role-Playing paradigm. Inspired by Stanislavski’s "emotional memory” acting theory, this paradigm frames persona knowledge as the LLM’s internal memory store, requiring retrieval and application based solely on dialogue context, thereby providing a rigorous test of depth and autonomous use of knowledge. Centered on this paradigm, we contribute: (1) MREval, a fine-grained evaluation framework assessing four memory-driven abilities—Anchoring, Selecting, Bounding, and Enacting; (2) MRPrompt, a prompting architecture that guides structured memory retrieval and response generation; and (3) MRBench, a bilingual (Chinese/English) benchmark for fine-grained diagnosis. The novel paradigm provides a comprehensive diagnostic for four-stage role-playing abilities across 12 LLMs. Crucially, experiments show that MRPrompt allows small models (e.g., Qwen3-8B) to match the performance of much larger closed-source LLMs (e.g., Qwen3-Max and GLM-4.7), and confirm that upstream memory gains directly enhance downstream response quality, validating the staged theoretical foundation.

Abstract:
Existing methods for enhancing the inductive reasoning of large language models (LLMs) at test-time typically depend on iterative self-refinement of hypotheses, which lacks explicit optimization guidance and effective error correction. This often results in superficial rewording and the accumulation of errors. To overcome these limitations, we propose MATSIR, a plug-and-play test-time framework integrating Multi-Agent coordination with Monte Carlo Tree Search to improve Inductive Reasoning. MATSIR incorporates a dual-reward mechanism that provides explicit refinement signals, promoting logically coherent and semantically enriched hypotheses rather than mere rephrasing. Furthermore, it enables trajectory-level error correction through backtracking and pruning, allowing the system to recover from erroneous intermediate hypotheses. Experiments on five benchmarks across four LLMs show that MATSIR consistently outperforms previous best methods, yielding the highest average improvement of +4.9% on QWQ-32B and all-round improvement on Deepseek-V3. Our findings highlight that explicit guided search with built-in error correction is essential for advancing inductive reasoning in LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/SolarWindRider/MATSIR

Abstract:
While prompt engineering enhances the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), it also exposes critical safety concerns. Due to the inherent brittleness of their static safety boundaries, LLMs are vulnerable to jailbreak prompts, i.e. adversarial inputs designed to bypass safeguards and induce the generation of harmful content. Existing detection mechanisms rely on static model components or fixed decision thresholds, limiting their ability to generalize to evolving attack patterns and continual model updates. To bridge this gap, we propose RLShield, a dynamic jailbreak detection framework that employs reinforcement learning for adaptive threshold selection. RLShield incorporates three key innovations: (i) a dynamic retrieval and LLM-based rewriting module to simulate diverse adversarial contexts; (ii) a cross-layer representation analysis to pinpoint safety-critical parameters; and (iii) a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) based agent that learns to predict optimal, sample-specific detection thresholds. Experimental results demonstrate that RLShield consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in detection performance while maintaining high computational efficiency. Notably, it improves F1 by up to 7.3%, while achieving an average of 3 × gain in inference efficiency across multiple LLM backbones.

Abstract:
Generative AI can now synthesize strikingly realistic images from text, yet output quality remains highly sensitive to how prompts are phrased. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) offers a lightweight, off-policy alternative to RL for automatic prompt engineering, but its token-level regularization leaves semantic inconsistency unchecked as prompts that win higher preference scores can still drift away from the user’s intended meaning. We introduce Sem-DPO, a variant of DPO that preserves semantic consistency yet retains its simplicity and efficiency. Sem-DPO adjusts the DPO loss using a weight based on how different the winning prompt is from the original, reducing the impact of training examples that are semantically misaligned. We provide the first analytical bound on semantic drift for preference-tuned prompt generators, showing that Sem-DPO keeps learned prompts within a provably bounded neighborhood of the original text. On three standard text-to-image prompt-optimization benchmarks and three language models, Sem-DPO achieves 8–12% higher CLIP similarity and 5–9% higher human-preference scores (HPSv2.1, PickScore) than DPO, while also outperforming state-of-the-art prompt optimization baselines as well as several DPO variants. These findings suggest that strong flat baselines augmented with semantic weighting should become the new standard for prompt-optimization studies and lay the groundwork for broader, semantics-aware preference optimization in language models.

Abstract:
Understanding the internal representations of large language models (LLMs) remains a central challenge for interpretability research. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) offer a promising solution by decomposing activations into interpretable features, but existing approaches rely on fixed sparsity constraints that fail to account for input complexity. We propose AdaptiveK SAE (Adaptive Top K Sparse Autoencoders), a novel framework that dynamically adjusts sparsity levels based on the semantic complexity of each input. Leveraging linear probes, we demonstrate that context complexity is linearly encoded in LLM representations, and we use this signal to guide feature allocation during training. Experiments across ten language models demonstrate that this complexity-driven adaptation outperforms fixed-sparsity approaches on reconstruction fidelity, explained variance, cosine similarity and interpretability metrics while eliminating the burden of extensive hyperparameter tuning. Our code is available at: https://github.com/hiyukie/adaptiveK.

Abstract:
While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in chemical visual understanding, current models are predominantly optimized for direct visual question-answering tasks. This paradigm often results in "black-box" systems that fail to utilize the inherent capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to infer underlying reaction mechanisms. In this work, we introduce ChemVLR, a chemical VLM designed to prioritize reasoning within the perception process. Unlike conventional chemical VLMs, ChemVLR analyzes visual inputs in a fine-grained manner by explicitly identifying granular chemical descriptors, such as functional groups, prior to generating answers. This approach ensures the production of explicit and interpretable reasoning paths for complex visual chemical problems. To facilitate this methodology, we implement a cross-modality reverse-engineering strategy combined with a rigorous filtering pipeline to curate a large-scale reasoning and caption dataset, comprising 760k high-quality samples across molecular and reaction tasks. Furthermore, we adopt a three-stage training framework that systemically builds model perception and reasoning capacity. Experiments demonstrate that ChemVLR achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, surpassing both leading proprietary models and domain-specific open-source baselines. We also provide comprehensive ablation studies to validate our training strategy and data generation designs.

Abstract:
Electronic health records (EHRs) provide longitudinal evidence for clinical prediction, but EHR data are sparse, incomplete, and heterogeneous, which can limit robustness. Medical knowledge graphs (MKGs) have therefore been incorporated to support KG-enhanced clinical prediction by linking heterogeneous EHR codes to shared medical concepts via structured relations. However, existing KG-enhanced approaches remain limited in two aspects: (i) task-specific knowledge selection when extracting knowledge from a large multi-source MKG; and (ii) patient-level personalization and knowledge integration, where personalization is often weakly controlled and knowledge integration is not sufficiently aligned with longitudinal patient trajectories. To address these issues, we propose MedCPI, a unified Construct–Personalize–Integrate framework. MedCPI first performs task-guided schema induction and KG normalization to build a task-specific Concept MKG as a denoised knowledge pool, then constructs controlled patient-level PKGs via local expansion and short path search, and finally integrates PKG representations with time-aware EHR representations via cross-attention for prediction. Experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV across four clinical prediction tasks show consistent improvements over strong EHR-only and KG-enhanced baselines. Ablations and additional analyses further validate the contribution of each stage and illustrate how MedCPI utilizes structured medical knowledge.

Abstract:
Continued Pre-Training (CPT) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to acquire second-language capabilities, yet the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate how CPT adapts model representations across diverse language families and scripts, model sizes, and architectures. We find that second-language abilities emerge through a selective adaptation mechanism: task-solving capabilities are preserved in “semantic hub”, while interface layers retarget to shifted token distributions. Layer-swapping experiments demonstrate that semantic understanding can be surgically transferred between base and CPT models with minimal loss (e.g., swapping 50% of model parameters reduces performance by only 0.3%). Furthermore, we establish that attention components route language adaptation: larger parameter changes than feedforward networks, correlate more strongly with language-specific neurons, and their surgical replacement substantially degrades performance. Overall, our work provides a mechanistic understanding of CPT, guiding future work on efficient strategies for language adaptation.

Abstract:
Bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) poses significant risks to trustworthiness, manifesting primarily as stereotypical biases (e.g., gender or racial stereotypes) and structural biases (e.g., lexical overlap or position preferences). However, prior paradigms typically address these in isolation, often mitigating one at the expense of exacerbating the other. To address this, we conduct a systematic exploration of these reasoning failures and identify a primary inducement: the latent spurious feature correlations within the input that drive these erroneous reasoning shortcuts. Driven by these findings, we introduce Causal-Contrastive Preference Optimization (C2PO), a unified alignment framework designed to tackle these specific failures by simultaneously discovering and suppressing these correlations directly within the optimization process. Specifically, C2PO leverages causal counterfactual signals to isolate bias-inducing features from valid reasoning paths, and employs a fairness-sensitive preference update mechanism to dynamically evaluate logit-level contributions and suppress shortcut features. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks covering stereotypical bias (BBQ, Unqover), structural bias (MNLI, HANS, Chatbot, MT-Bench), out-of-domain fairness (StereoSet, WinoBias), and general utility (MMLU, GSM8K) demonstrate that C2PO effectively mitigates stereotypical and structural biases while preserving robust general reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Deep Research Agents (DRAs) are transforming automated knowledge discovery and problem-solving.While the majority of existing efforts focus on enhancing policy capabilities via post-training, we propose an alternative paradigm: test-time self-evolving the agent’s ability by iteratively verifying the policy model’s outputs, guided by meticulously crafted rubrics. This approach gives rise to an inference-time scaling of verification, wherein an agent self-improves at test time by evaluating its generated answers to produce iterative feedback and refinements without any additional training. We derive the rubrics based on an automatically constructed DRA Failure Taxonomy, which systematically classifies agent failures into five major categories and thirteen sub-categories. We present DeepVerifier, a rubrics-based outcome reward verifier that leverages the asymmetry of verification and outperforms vanilla agent-as-judge and LLM judge baselines by 12%–48% in meta-evaluation F1 score. To enable practical test-time self-evolution, DeepVerifier integrates as a plug-and-play module during test-time inference. The verifier produces detailed rubric-based feedback, which is fed back to the agent for iterative bootstrapping—refining responses without additional training. This test-time scaling delivers 8%–11% accuracy gains on challenging subsets of GAIA and XBench-DeepResearch when powered by capable closed-source LLMs. Finally, to support open-source advancement, we release DeepVerifier-4K, a curated supervised fine-tuning dataset of 4,646 high-quality agent steps focused on DRA verification. These examples emphasize reflection and self-critique, enabling open models to develop robust verification capabilities.

Abstract:
Financial question answering (QA) over long corporate filings requires evidence to satisfy strict constraints on entities, financial metrics, fiscal periods, and numeric values. However, existing LLM-based rerankers primarily optimize semantic relevance, leading to unstable rankings and opaque decisions on long documents. We propose FINCARDS, a structured reranking framework that reframes financial evidence selection as constraint satisfaction under a finance-aware schema. FINCARDS represents filing chunks and questions using aligned schema fields (entities, metrics, periods, and numeric spans), enabling deterministic field-level matching. Evidence is selected via a multi-stage tournament reranking with stability-aware aggregation, producing auditable decision traces. Across two corporate filing QA benchmarks, FINCARDS substantially improves early-rank retrieval over both lexical and LLM-based reranking baselines, while reducing ranking variance, without requiring model fine-tuning or unpredictable inference budgets. Our code is available at https://github.com/XanderZhou2022/FINCARDS.

Abstract:
High-fidelity audio generation techniques, such as voice conversion and singing voice synthesis, have significantly increased the risk of audio deepfakes. Although existing methods perform well on conversational speech deepfake detection, they fail severely under the speech-to-singing domain shift. To address this limitation, we propose GenuVoice, a unified deepfake detector based on a multi-branch mixture-of-experts architecture that integrates three complementary feature views: Wav2Vec 2.0 representations, log-mel spectrograms, and mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC). Each expert is trained to remain independently discriminative, while a learned gating network dynamically weights expert contributions. A speech-retentive multi-domain fine-tuning strategy enables adaptation to singing without degrading speech performance. GenuVoice achieves 1.82% Equal Error Rate (EER) on CtrSVDD, compared to 37–62% for existing speech-trained detectors, while preserving strong speech performance (0.38% EER on ASVspoof 2019) and generalizing to unseen generators (8.89% EER on held-out ASVspoof 2021). Extensive ablations confirm the importance of multi-expert fusion and speech retention, establishing GenuVoice as an effective unified detector for speech and singing deepfakes. The implementation code is available at https://github.com/aastha-sharma/genuvoice

Abstract:
Cross-task generalization mimics human intelligence through the ability to perform tasks by recalling foundational skills acquired previously. In this paper, we argue that argument generation and argument retrieval are complex tasks that could leverage cross-tasking atomic argument mining and argument quality assessment tasks, even if there is no supervision. We empirically demonstrate the rationale behind our claim through the ArgLLM framework, including a total of 18.9K instruction data using a multi-choice question-answering format, scaling up through multi-tasking and model merging, six natural language argumentation atomic tasks to four complex argument generation and argument retrieval tasks. Our results and analysis, using the backbone Mistral and Llama models, show that cross-tasking in zero-shot settings outperforms base models and is robust to varying strategies, tasks, and model sizes, offering a valuable trade-off between computational cost and task performance.

Abstract:
Code optimization remains a core objective in software development, yet modern compilers struggle to navigate the enormous optimization spaces. While recent research has looked into employing large language models (LLMs) to optimize source code directly, these techniques can introduce semantic errors and miss fine-grained compiler-level optimization opportunities. We present HintPilot, which bridges LLM-based reasoning with traditional compiler infrastructures via synthesizing compiler hints —annotations that steer compiler behavior. HintPilot employs retrieval-augmented synthesis over compiler documentation and applies profiling-guided iterative refinement to synthesize semantics-preserving and effective hints. Upon PolyBench and HumanEval-CPP benchmarks, HintPilot achieves up to 6.88x geometric mean speedup over -Ofast while preserving program correctness.

Abstract:
Character description generation is an important capability for narrative-focused applications such as summarization, story analysis, and character-driven simulations. However, generating accurate character descriptions from long-form narratives (e.g., novels) is challenging: models must track evolving attributes (e.g., relationships and events), integrate evidence scattered across the text, and infer implicit details. Despite the success of reasoning-enabled LLMs on many benchmarks, we find that for character description generation their performance improves when built-in reasoning is disabled (i.e., an empty reasoning trace). Motivated by this, we propose a training framework that decouples reasoning from generation. Our approach, which can be applied on top of long-context LLMs or chunk-based methods, consists of a reasoning model that produces a structured QA reasoning trace and a generation model that conditions on this trace to produce the final character description. Experiments on two datasets (BookWorm and CroSS) show that QA-guided reasoning improves faithfulness, informativeness, and grounding over strong long-context baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often need to balance their internal parametric knowledge with external information, such as user beliefs and content from retrieved documents, in real-world scenarios like RAG or chat-based systems. A model’s ability to reliably process these sources is key to system safety. Previous studies on knowledge conflict and sycophancy are limited to a binary conflict paradigm, primarily exploring conflicts between parametric knowledge and either a document or a user, but ignoring the interactive environment where all three sources exist simultaneously. To fill this gap, we propose a three-source interaction framework and systematically evaluate 27 LLMs from 3 families on 2 datasets. Our findings reveal general patterns: most models rely more on document assertions than user assertions, and this preference is reinforced by post-training. Furthermore, our behavioral analysis shows that most models are impressionable, unable to effectively discriminate between helpful and harmful external information. To address this, we demonstrate that fine-tuning on diverse source interaction data can significantly increase a model’s discrimination abilities. In short, our work paves the way for developing trustworthy LLMs that can effectively and reliably integrate multiple sources of information. Code is available at https://github.com/shuowl/llm-source-balancing.

Abstract:
Understanding climate change requires reasoning over complex causal networks. Yet, existing causal discovery datasets predominantly capture explicit, direct causal relations. We introduce ClimateCause, a manually expert-annotated dataset of higher-order causal structures from science-for-policy climate reports, including implicit and nested causality. Cause-effect expressions are normalized and disentangled into individual causal relations to facilitate graph construction, with unique annotations for cause-effect correlation, relation type, and spatiotemporal context. We further demonstrate ClimateCause’s value for quantifying readability based on the semantic complexity of causal graphs underlying a statement. Finally, large language model benchmarking on correlation inference and causal chain reasoning highlights the latter as a key challenge.

Abstract:
Machine Unlearning (MU) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to remove unsafe or outdated information. However, existing work assumes that all facts are equally forgettable and largely ignores whether the forgotten knowledge originates from pretraining or supervised fine-tuning (SFT). In this paper, we introduce DUAL (Dual Unlearning Evaluation across Training Stages), a benchmark of 28.6k Wikidata-derived triplets annotated with fact popularity using Wikipedia link counts and LLM-based salience scores. Our experiments show that pretrained and SFT models respond differently to unlearning. An SFT step on the forget data yields smoother forgetting, more stable tuning, and 10–50% higher retention, while direct unlearning on pretrained models remains unstable and prone to relearning or catastrophic forgetting.

Abstract:
Investigating black-box jailbreak attacks is crucial for revealing the actual security risks faced by operational Large Language Models (LLMs). The primary challenge in black-box jailbreak attack is the absence of direct optimization signals, such as gradients, to guide the refinement of adversarial prompts. While current mainstream methods like PAIR and TAP attempt to leverage the model’s textual output as feedback, facing a critical limitation when models consistently generate static refusal responses, depriving the attacker of any actionable signal to distinguish better prompts. To overcome the bottleneck and reveal whether there is potential risk to open access to partial logprobs information, we investigate LLM output distribution. Our empirical analysis reveals that refusal responses exhibit a highly consistent distributional pattern at the first generated token, suggesting that the deviation from this standard pattern can serve as a quantifiable metric for LLM generating refusal response. Based on this insight, we propose Distribution Jailbreak (DJ), an attack method that select effective jailbreak templates and then iteratively optimizes adversarial suffixes by maximizing the KL divergence from the standard refusal distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DJ achieves state-of-the-art Attack Success Rate(ASR). Notably, DJ achieves over 90% ASR on all tested open-source models, and delivers over 94% ASR on GPT-4.1. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Zed630/DistributionJailbreak.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can comply with harmful instructions, raising serious safety concerns despite their impressive capabilities. Recent work has leveraged probing-based approaches to study the separability of malicious and benign inputs in LLMs’ internal representations, and researchers have proposed using such probing methods for safety detection. We systematically re-examine this paradigm. Motivated by poor out-of-distribution performance, we hypothesize that probes learn superficial patterns rather than semantic harmfulness. Through controlled experiments, we confirm this hypothesis and identify the specific patterns learned: instructional patterns and trigger words. Our investigation follows a systematic approach, progressing from demonstrating comparable performance of simple n-gram methods, to controlled experiments with semantically cleaned datasets, to detailed analysis of pattern dependencies. These results reveal a false sense of security around current probing-based approaches and highlight the need to redesign both models and evaluation protocols, for which we provide further discussions in the hope of suggesting responsible further research in this direction.

Abstract:
Neologisms and emerging slang are central to daily conversation, yet challenging for non-native speakers (NNS) to interpret and use appropriately in cross-cultural communication with native speakers (NS). NNS increasingly make use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools to learn these words. We study the utility of such tools in mediating an informal communication scenario through a human-subjects study (N=234): NNS participants learn English neologisms with AI support, write messages using the learned word to an NS friend, and judge contextual appropriateness of the neologism in two provided writing samples. Using both NS evaluator-rated communicative competence of NNS-produced writing and NNS’ contextual appropriateness judgments, we compare three AI-based support conditions: AI Definition, AI Rewrite into simpler English, AI Explanation of meaning and usage, and Non-AI Dictionary for comparison. We show that AI Explanation yields the largest gains over no support in NS-rated competence, while contextual appropriateness judgments show indifference across support. NNS participants’ self-reported perceptions tend to overestimate NS ratings, revealing a mismatch between perceived and actual competence. We further observe a significant gap between NNS- and NS-produced writing, highlighting the limitations of current AI tools and informing design for future tools.

Abstract:
Multimodal clinical records contain structured measurements and clinical notes recorded over time, offering rich temporal information about the evolution of patient health. Yet these observations are sparse, and whether they are recorded depends on the patient’s latent condition. Observation patterns also differ across modalities, as structured measurements and clinical notes arise under distinct recording processes. While prior work has developed methods that accommodate missingness in clinical time series, how to extract and use the information carried by the observation process itself remains underexplored. We therefore propose a patient representation learning framework for multimodal clinical time series that explicitly leverages informative missingness. The framework combines (1) a multimodal encoder that captures signals from structured and textual data together with their observation patterns, (2) a Bayesian filtering module that updates a latent patient state over time from observed multimodal signals, and (3) downstream modules for offline treatment policy learning and patient outcome prediction based on the learned patient state. We evaluate the framework on ICU sepsis cohorts from MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, and eICU. It improves both offline treatment policy learning and adverse outcome prediction, achieving FQE 0.679 versus 0.528 for clinician behavior and AUROC 0.886 for post-72-hour mortality prediction on MIMIC-III.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) empowered agents have recently emerged as advanced paradigms that exhibit impressive capabilities in a wide range of domains and tasks. Despite their potential, current LLM agents often adopt a one-size-fits-all approach, lacking the flexibility to respond to users’ varying needs and preferences. This limitation motivates us to develop PersonaAgent, the first personalized LLM agent framework designed to address versatile personalization tasks. Specifically, PersonaAgent integrates two complementary components: a personalized memory module that includes episodic and semantic memory mechanisms; a personalized action module that enables the agent to perform tool actions tailored to the user. At the core, the persona (defined as unique system prompt for each user) functions as an intermediary: it leverages insights from personalized memory to control agent actions, while the outcomes of these actions in turn refine the memory. Based on the framework, we propose a test-time user-preference alignment strategy that simulate the latest n interactions to optimize the persona prompt, ensuring real-time user preference alignment through textual loss feedback between simulated and ground-truth responses. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that PersonaAgent significantly outperforms other baseline methods by not only personalizing the action space effectively but also scaling during test-time real-world applications. These results underscore the feasibility and potential of our approach in delivering tailored, dynamic user experiences.

Abstract:
User interactions with language models vary due to static properties of the user (trait) and the specific context of the interaction (state). However, existing persona datasets (like PersonaChat, PANDORA etc.) capture only trait, and ignore the impact of state. We introduce Chameleon, a dataset of 5,001 contextual psychological profiles from 1,667 Reddit users, each measured across multiple contexts. Using the Chameleon dataset, we present three key findings. First, inspired by Latent State-Trait theory, we decompose variance and find that 74% is within-person (state) while only 26% is between-person (trait). Second, we find that LLMs are state-blind: they focus on trait only, and produce similar responses regardless of state. Third, we find that reward models react to user state, but inconsistently: different models favor or penalize the same users in opposite directions. We release Chameleon to support research on affective computing, personalized dialogue, and RLHF alignment.

Abstract:
Translating natural language into SQL (Text2SQL) is a longstanding challenge at the intersection of natural language understanding and structured data access. While large language models (LLMs) have significantly improved fluency in SQL generation, producing correct and executable SQL, particularly for complex queries, remains a bottleneck. We present Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 , a reinforcement learning (RL) framework and model family designed to generate accurate, executable SQL using a lightweight reward signal based solely on execution correctness. Our approach avoids brittle intermediate supervision and complex reward shaping, promoting stable training and alignment with the end task. Combined with carefully curated data, strong supervised initialization, and effective training practices, Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 achieves state-of-the-art execution accuracy across six diverse Text2SQL benchmarks and ranks among the leading entries on the BIRD leaderboard. Notably, our 7B model outperforms prior 70B-class systems, highlighting the framework’s scalability and efficiency. We further demonstrate inference-time robustness through simple extensions like value retrieval and majority voting. Extensive experiments and ablation studies offer both positive and negative insights, providing practical guidance for future Text2SQL research.

Abstract:
Embedding-as-a-Service (EaaS) has emerged as a critical paradigm for commercializing large language models (LLMs). However, existing backdoor watermarking techniques are fundamentally limited to "zero-bit" detection, which prevents user-level traceability in multi-user EaaS scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose RShield, a multi-bit backdoor watermarking that enables reliable user-level attribution of LLMs for EaaS under model extraction attacks. RShield integrates Reed-Solomon error-correcting codes with orthogonal feature mapping to introduce highly-structured redundancy, constructing fault-tolerant symbol sequences for multi-bit watermark space, thereby staying recoverable even after aggressive extraction noise condition.To mitigate semantic distortion under the interference of noise channel, RShield employs a lightweight Adapter to adaptively inject multi-bit watermarks in the feature space, preserving the quality of EaaS while achieving a user-level traceability.Extensive experiments on four NLP benchmarks demonstrate that RShield efficiently achieves 100% multi-bit watermark recovery and high semantic fidelity under model extraction attacks compared to existing methods, while significantly reducing the degradation of watermarking on downstream task performance.

Abstract:
In the real world, the execution of a task often depends on the executor’s recognition of its value. Motivated by this observation, we propose the value-driven jailbreak attack (VDJA), a simple and effective black-box jailbreak method against large language models (LLMs). VDJA first exploits the phenomenon that LLMs tend to agree with humans to induce LLMs to affirm the moral value of harmful tasks. During autoregressive generation, these value-endorsement tokens function as an implicit value prior, making LLMs more likely to accept and generate harmful content. Extensive experiments on five state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs demonstrate the superiority of VDJA. Using only a single query and without concealing harmful instructions, VDJA achieves an average attack success rate (ASR) of 91.8% on JailbreakBench and 95.2% on the AdvBench subset, showcasing SOTA jailbreak success rates and attack efficiency. Most importantly, our work suggests a previously underexplored vulnerability in the safety guardrails of LLMs, which highlights the urgent need to enhance their robustness.

Abstract:
Despite progress in LLM summarization, factual hallucinations persist, motivating Attributed Summary Generation (ASG), which requires sentence-level citations. However, existing prompt-based approaches face severe challenges such as positional preference, poor citation quality and sensitivity to uninformative documents. In view of these limitations, we propose RAAC , a framework of 𝐑 eflective 𝐀 gents with 𝐀 daptive 𝐂 ollaboration for attributed summarization. RAAC performs iterative summarization via reflective agents’ collaboration, where a post reflection module evaluates the consistency between the summary and the input documents, based on which it critiques the summary and uses the resulting feedback to recalibrate the inputs to the next adaptive iteration. The agents’ collaboration involves two components: TextAgent and CitationAgent . Experimental results on the ALCE benchmark demonstrate that our framework outperforms existing baselines in both factual correctness and citation quality.

Abstract:
We introduce VLURes, a multilingual benchmark for evaluating Vision-Language Models (VLMs) under long-text grounding: selecting and reasoning over the image-relevant subset of article-length text that contains distractors and ungrounded claims. VLURes contains 4,000 web-curated image + long-text pairs across English (En), Japanese (Ja), Swahili (Sw), and Urdu (Ur) and 10 topical categories, and defines eight tasks spanning image-only perception (OR, SU, RU, SS, IC) and image+text grounding (ITM, Unrelatedness, VQA). To construct web-realistic pairs, we apply language-adapted CLIP alignment to select representative images and filter weakly grounded pages. Across 10 proprietary and open VLMs evaluated under zero-shot and one-shot prompting, with and without rationales, the best model (GPT-4o) reaches 90.8% overall accuracy but remains 6.7 points below human performance (97.5%) on Object Recognition, and cross-lingual sensitivity persists, while open models are substantially weaker and often lack reliable multilingual VL support. VLURes provides a practical testbed for long-text grounding and multilingual robustness in web-realistic agent settings.

Abstract:
Efficient inference in Large Vision-Language Models is constrained by the high cost of processing thousands of visual tokens, yet it remains unclear which tokens and computations can be safely removed. While attention scores are commonly used to estimate visual token importance, they are an imperfect proxy for actual contribution. We show that Attention Contribution, which weights attention probabilities by value vector magnitude, provides a more accurate criterion for visual token selection. Our empirical analysis reveals that visual attention sinks are functionally heterogeneous, comprising Probability Dumps with low contribution that can be safely pruned, and Structural Anchors with high contribution essential for maintaining model performance. Further, we identify substantial redundancy in Feed-Forward Networks (FFNs) associated with visual tokens, particularly in intermediate layers where image tokens exhibit linear behavior. Based on our findings, we introduce CAPA (Contribution-Aware Pruning and FFN Approximation), a dual-strategy framework that prunes visual tokens using attention contribution at critical functional transitions and reduces FFN computation through efficient linear approximations. Experiments on various benchmarks across baselines show that CAPA achieves competent efficiency–performance trade-offs with improved robustness.

Abstract:
As Generative Engines revolutionize information retrieval by synthesizing direct answers from retrieved sources, ensuring source visibility becomes a significant challenge. Improving it through targeted content revisions is a practical strategy termed Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). However, optimizing a document for diverse queries presents a constrained optimization challenge where heterogeneous queries often impose conflicting and competing revision requirements under a limited content budget. To address this challenge, we propose IF-GEO, a "diverge-then-converge" framework comprising two phases: (i) mining distinct optimization preferences from representative latent queries; (ii) synthesizing a Global Revision Blueprint for guided editing by coordinating preferences via conflict-aware instruction fusion. To explicitly quantify IF-GEO’s objective of cross-query stability, we introduce risk-aware stability metrics. Experiments on multi-query benchmarks demonstrate that IF-GEO achieves substantial performance gains while maintaining robustness across diverse retrieval scenarios.

Abstract:
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has boosted mathematical reasoning, yet geometry remains challenging where auxiliary construction is often essential. Prior methods either underperform or depend on very large models (e.g., GPT-4o), making them costly. We argue that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (e.g., GRPO) can train smaller models to couple auxiliary construction with solid geometric reasoning. However, naively applying GRPO yields unconditional rewards, encouraging indiscriminate and sometimes harmful constructions. We propose Group Contrastive Policy Optimization (GCPO), an RL framework with two components: (1) Group Contrastive Masking, which assigns positive/negative construction rewards based on contextual utility, and (2) a Length Reward that encourages longer reasoning chains. On top of GCPO, we build GeometryZero, an affordable family of geometry reasoning models that selectively use auxiliary construction. Experiments on Geometry3K and MathVista show GeometryZero consistently outperforms RL baselines (e.g., GRPO, ToRL).

Abstract:
Text-to-image (T2I) generative models have achieved remarkable visual fidelity, yet remain vulnerable to generating unsafe content. Existing safety defenses typically intervene internally within the generative model, but suffer from severe concept entanglement, leading to degradation of benign generation quality—a trade-off we term the Safety Tax. To overcome this limitation, we advocate a paradigm shift from destructive internal editing to external safety rectification. Following this principle, we propose SafePatch, a structurally isolated safety module that performs external, interpretable rectification without modifying the base model. The core backbone of SafePatch is architecturally instantiated as a trainable clone of the base model’s encoder, allowing it to inherit rich semantic priors and maintain representation consistency. To enable interpretable safety rectification, we construct a strictly aligned counterfactual safety dataset (ACS) for differential supervision training. Across nudity and multi-category bench- marks and recent adversarial prompt attacks, SafePatch achieves robust unsafe suppression (7% unsafe on I2P) while preserving image quality and semantic alignment.

Abstract:
Evidence-intensive analytical reports are expected to be fact-dense, quantitatively correct, and supported by figures. Yet one-shot long-form generation with large language models (LLMs) frequently produces fluent but under-supported drafts: core facts are missed, numbers drift, and key visuals are absent, making the report hard to trust. We propose EviReport, an evidence-tracked report-writing workflow that improves reliability by (i) organizing corpus evidence into compact, traceable units and retrieves query-relevant subgraphs into retrieval-ready packages (ii) leveraging a reasoning-focused LLM sketches a high-level plan for full coverage, then a chat-based LLM sharpens it into a detailed hierarchical outline with explicit scope and ordering (iii) rive generation with a facts-first iterative loop: extracting verifiable facts, composing strictly from those facts, then triggering gap-aware append queries to fill missing evidence To evaluate both correctness and completeness, we introduce EviReportBench, a benchmark instantiated on data-rich indicator reports that measures factual accuracy (claim verification), factual coverage (quiz-based evaluation), and visual evidence integration (image recall). Across 8 topics, experiments show that EviReport consistently outperforms strong baselines in factual coverage ( 2.16× ), factual accuracy (+8.9 points), and visual evidence integration (+34 points), approaching the quality of expert-written reports across multiple dimensions.

Abstract:
Simulating Standardized Patients with cognitive impairment offers a scalable and ethical solution for clinical training. However, existing methods rely on discrete prompt engineering and fail to capture the heterogeneity of deficits across varying domains and severity levels. To address this limitation, we propose StsPatient for the fine-grained simulation of cognitively impaired patients. We innovatively capture domain-specific features by extracting steering vectors from contrastive pairs of instructions and responses. Furthermore, we introduce a Stochastic Token Modulation (STM) mechanism to regulate the intervention probability. STM enables precise control over impairment severity while mitigating the instability of conventional vector methods. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that StsPatient significantly outperforms baselines in both clinical authenticity and severity controllability. Our code will be open-sourced upon acceptance.

Abstract:
Embodied agents in safety-critical applications such as Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) rely on multiple interdependent capabilities (e.g., perception, memory, planning, decision), making failures difficult to localize and attribute. Existing testing methods are largely system-level and provide limited insight into which capability deficiencies cause task failures. We propose a capability-oriented testing approach that enables failure detection and attribution by combining (1) adaptive test case generation via seed selection and mutation, (2) capability oracles for identifying capability-specific errors, and (3) a feedback mechanism that attributes failures to capabilities and guides further test generation. Experiments show that our method discovers more failure cases and more accurately pinpoints capability-level deficiencies than state-of-the-art baselines, providing more interpretable and actionable guidance for improving embodied agents.

Abstract:
In mathematical reasoning, data selection strategies predominantly rely on static, externally defined metrics, which fail to adapt to the evolving capabilities of models during training. This misalignment limits the efficiency of Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning. To bridge this gap, we introduce SAI-DPO (Self-Aware Iterative Data Persistent Optimization), a dynamic sampling framework that aligns training data with the model’s intrinsic competence. SAI-DPO operationalizes two novel metrics: Knowledge Semantic Alignment for targeting domain weaknesses, and Self-Aware Difficulty, derived from pass rates and reasoning path characteristics, to gauge instance complexity relative to the model’s current state. By iteratively recalibrating the data distribution based on real-time feedback, SAI-DPO dynamically aligns training samples with the model’s evolving competence, ensuring the data remains strictly relevant to the model’s current capability level. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks (including AIME24 and AMC23) demonstrate that SAI-DPO outperforms static baselines at most nearly 6 points, achieving state-of-the-art efficiency with significantly less data.

Abstract:
Code explanations are increasingly generated by large language models and used in software engineering workflows, making reliable evaluation essential. However, existing model-based and embedding-based methods often fail to distinguish correct explanations from partially or fully incorrect ones, and their similarity scores are poorly calibrated and do not reflect meaningful differences in explanation quality. To address this, we propose ODASim(Orderly, Dstinctive, and Absolute Similarity), a model-agnostic graded fine-tuning framework for embedding models that learns calibrated similarity representations between code and explanations. To support fine-grained supervision and evaluation, we also introduce ODA-X, a novel benchmark for code-to-explanation quality grading, comprising code–explanation pairs graded similarity labels derived from strategic perturbations of gold explanations. We apply our ODASim approach to multiple embedding models and evaluate it on two benchmarks: widely popular CodeXGLUE and our proposed benchmark ODA-X, spanning four programming languages - Python, Java, JavaScript, and Go. Results show that our method achieves up to 35% improvement in F1 score and 85% reduction in Expected Calibration Error (ECE), enabling reliable evaluation of code to explanation quality.

Abstract:
Multi-turn tool-integrated reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks through iterative information retrieval. However, current reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks for search-augmented reasoning predominantly rely on sparse outcome-level rewards, leading to a "Double Homogenization Dilemma." This manifests as (1) Process homogenization, where the thinking, reasoning, and tooling involved in generation are ignored. (2) Intra-group homogenization, coarse-grained outcome rewards often lead to inefficiencies in intra-group advantage estimation with methods like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) during sampling. To address this, we propose Turn-level Stage-aware Policy Optimization (TSPO). TSPO introduces the First-Occurrence Latent Reward (FOLR) mechanism, allocating partial rewards to the step where the ground-truth answer first appears, thereby preserving process-level signals and increasing reward variance within groups without requiring external reward models or any annotations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TSPO significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving average performance gains of 24% and 13.6% on Qwen2.5-3B and 7B models, respectively. Code is available at https://github.com/Flipped-May/TSPO.

Abstract:
Mixture of Experts (MoE) dynamically routes inputs to specialized expert networks, enabling large language models to scale capacity with low inference overhead. To further improve MoE’s parameter efficiency in resource-constrained scenarios, LoRA–MoE integrates LoRA for lightweight adaptation while preserving MoE’s specialization. Despite these benefits, the effectiveness of LoRA–MoE still hinges on balanced expert utilization, where certain experts dominate activations while most remain underutilized. Existing balancing strategies focus on constraining the final distribution of expert usage, but overlook the routing decisions made at each layer. As a result, imbalances gradually accumulate across the routing hierarchy. To address this challenge, we propose LayerMoE, a novel three-stage framework that leverages process-level rewards to guide balanced expert routing. Specifically, to overcome the limitation of focusing only on final losses and ignoring intermediate routing, we introduce Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based sampling that decomposes outcome-level supervision into layer-wise reward signals, guiding expert choices throughout the routing process. For efficiency, we organize Transformer layers into groups, which constrain the search space of MCTS and keep exploration overhead tractable while retaining the hierarchical structure. Extensive experiments on representative datasets (e.g., ARC, RACE, OBQA) show that applying LayerMoE consistently improves the performance of state-of-the-art LoRA-MoE baselines, yielding an average accuracy gain of 1.39%. Notably, the maximum improvement reaches 2.50%.

Abstract:
The rapid growth of scientific literature calls for automated methods to assess and predict research impact.Prior work has largely focused on citation-based metrics, leaving limited evaluation of models’ capability to reason about other impact dimensions.To this end, we introduce SciImpact, a large-scale, multi-dimensional benchmark for scientific impact prediction spanning 19 fields.SciImpact captures various forms of scientific influence, ranging from citation counts to award recognition, media attention, patent reference, and artifact adoption, by integrating heterogeneous data sources and targeted web crawling.It comprises 215,928 contrastive paper pairs reflecting meaningful impact differences in both short- (e.g., Best Paper Award) and long-term settings (e.g., Nobel Prize).We evaluate 11 widely used large language models (LLMs) on SciImpact.Results show that off-the-shelf models show substantial variability across dimensions and fields, while multi-task supervised fine-tuning consistently enables smaller LLMs (e.g., 4B) to markedly outperform much larger models (e.g., 30B) and surpass powerful closed-source LLMs (e.g., o4-mini).These results establish SciImpact as a challenging benchmark and demonstrate its value for multi-dimensional, multi-field scientific impact prediction.Our project homepage is https://flypig23.github.io/sciimpact-homepage/.

Abstract:
Multimodal learning aims to learn unified multimodal representations from heterogeneous modalities and supports many natural language processing tasks. However, multimodal models often exhibit modality laziness: over-relying on a dominant modality and under-exploiting complementary signals. Existing approaches typically strengthen unimodal training or rebalance modality contributions, but they may still emphasize shared semantics and overlook modality-specific cues. To address this, we propose SCOPE, a unified framework for learning complete multimodal representations, achieving Shared-and-COmplementary cue PrEservation. Firstly, SCOPE uses a mutual information-guided disentanglement module to separate shared semantics from modality-specific cues and mitigate representation collapse. Secondly, SCOPE aligns modalities by enforcing structural consistency between modality-wise semantic graphs, avoiding brittle point-wise matching. Finally, SCOPE performs balanced fusion via structure-aware diffusion attention to integrate shared and complementary cues without feature homogenization. Experiments on four benchmark datasets show that SCOPE consistently outperforms SOTA baselines, achieving up to 27.10% accuracy improvement.

Abstract:
Personality steering in large language models (LLMs) commonly relies on injecting trait-specific steering vectors, implicitly assuming that personality traits can be controlled independently. In this work, we examine whether this assumption holds by analysing the geometric relationships between Big Five personality steering directions. We study steering vectors extracted from two model families (LLaMA-3-8B and Mistral-8B) and apply a range of geometric conditioning schemes, from unconstrained directions to soft and hard orthonormalisation. Our results show that personality steering directions exhibit substantial geometric dependence: steering one trait consistently induces changes in others, even when linear overlap is explicitly removed. While hard orthonormalisation enforces geometric independence, it does not eliminate cross-trait behavioural effects and can reduce steering strength. These findings suggest that personality traits in LLMs occupy a slightly coupled subspace, limiting fully independent trait control.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used, they remain susceptible to jailbreak prompts that can elicit harmful or inappropriate responses. This paper introduces STAR-Teaming, a novel black-box framework for automated red teaming that effectively generates such prompts. STAR-Teaming integrates a Multi-Agent System (MAS) with a Strategy-Response Multiplex Network and employs network-driven optimization to sample effective attack strategies. This network-based approach recasts the intractable high-dimensional embedding space into a tractable structure, yielding two key advantages: it enhances the interpretability of the LLM’s strategic vulnerabilities, and it streamlines the search for effective strategies by organizing the search space into semantic communities, thereby preventing redundant exploration. Empirical results demonstrate that STAR-Teaming significantly surpasses existing methods, achieving a higher attack success rate (ASR) at a lower computational cost. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness and explainability of the Multiplex Network. The code is available at https://github.com/selectstar-ai/STAR-Teaming-paper.

Abstract:
Temporal knowledge graph (TKG) forecasting aims to infer future facts from historical observations in time-evolving graphs. Traditional rule-based methods often rely on statistical co-occurrences and extensive path enumeration, suffering from rule sparsity and search-space explosion, while recent LLM-based rule reasoning can produce linguistically plausible rules that are weakly constrained by graph evidence and thus may reflect spurious correlations or violate temporal constraints.To address these challenges, we propose Critic-Guided Rule Induction (CRI), which treats temporal rules as rule hypotheses to be examined and adopts a decoupled Generation-Discrimination pipeline to induce rules that are both high-coverage and high-precision. CRI first mines seed rules and path evidence from the historical graph and uses an LLM-based generator to abstract and generalize them into broader raw rule hypotheses. It then introduces a Fact-Grounded Rule Evaluator to perform fact-grounded discrimination of rule hypotheses from complementary perspectives together with necessary temporal and statistical constraints. Finally, CRI performs symbolic reasoning over the refined rule set to produce forecasts with traceable reasoning evidence. Experiments on three benchmarks show that CRI outperforms strong baselines, achieving state-of-the-art performance on TKG forecasting.

Abstract:
Traditional psychological counseling struggles to meet public demand due to high costs, social stigma, and limited accessibility. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in healthcare, offering new opportunities to build accessible mental health dialogue systems. However, current LLMs often lack accurate modeling of cognitive empathy, especially the ability to understand users’ emotions and their underlying psychological causes. To address this, we propose CogEmp, a dialogue generation model tailored for the Chinese cultural context that integrates cognitive empathy. The model follows a three-stage decision pipeline: emotion and cause recognition, contextual understanding, and empathetic response generation. First, the model identifies the user’s fine-grained emotions and their underlying causes within the Chinese context, laying the foundation for personalized emotional comprehension. Then, it retrieves semantically similar counseling cases to extract topic and strategy information, thereby constructing a context-aware representation. Finally, guided by the extracted multi-dimensional cues, the model drives LLMs to generate empathetic responses that are both contextually appropriate and professionally grounded. Experiments conducted on Chinese mental health datasets show that CogEmp outperforms existing approaches in key evaluation metrics, particularly in empathy, comprehensibility, and professionalism.

Abstract:
Larger language models become simultaneously better and worse at handling contextual information—better at ignoring false claims, worse at ignoring irrelevant tokens. We formalize this apparent paradox through the first scaling laws for contextual entrainment, the tendency of models to favor tokens that appeared in context regardless of relevance. Analyzing the Cerebras-GPT (111M–13B) and Pythia (14M–12B) model families, we find entrainment follows predictable power-law scaling, but with opposite trends depending on context type: semantic contexts show decreasing entrainment with scale, while non-semantic contexts show increasing entrainment. Concretely, the largest models are four times more resistant to counterfactual misinformation than the smallest, yet simultaneously twice as prone to copying arbitrary tokens. These diverging trends, which replicate across model families, suggest that semantic filtering and mechanical copying are functionally distinct behaviors that scale in opposition. These opposing trends suggest that scaling alone does not resolve context sensitivity—it reshapes it.

Abstract:
Conventional Euclidean geometries lead to structural distortion and entangle core pharmacophoric identities with peripheral groups. Existing molecule-language models, relying on linear or uniform encodings, often obscure the hierarchical organization of chemical semantics. To address this, we propose Geometric-Language Alignment (GLA), a framework integrating intrinsic molecular topology into large language models. GLA employs a mixed-curvature encoder that adaptively learns geometric representations through a gating mechanism. These representations are aligned with text via a dual-view contrastive objective and injected into a frozen language model. Experiments on cross-modal retrieval, captioning, and property prediction benchmarks show GLA consistently improves performance over baselines, suggesting that modeling geometric heterogeneity enhances the grounding between molecular structure and chemical language.

Abstract:
The saturation of high-quality pre-training data has shifted research focus toward evolutionary systems capable of continuously generating novel artifacts, leading to the success of AlphaEvolve. However, the progress of such systems is hindered by the lack of rigorous, quantitative evaluation. To tackle this challenge, we introduce CreativeBench, a benchmark for evaluating machine creativity in code generation, grounded in a classical cognitive framework. Comprising two subsets – CreativeBench-Combo and CreativeBench-Explore – the benchmark targets combinatorial and exploratory creativity through an automated pipeline utilizing reverse engineering and self-play. By leveraging executable code, CreativeBench objectively distinguishes creativity from hallucination via a unified metric defined as the product of quality and novelty. Our analysis of state-of-the-art models reveals distinct behaviors: (1) scaling significantly improves combinatorial creativity but yields diminishing returns for exploration; (2) larger models exhibit “convergence-by-scaling,” becoming more correct but less divergent; and (3) reasoning capabilities primarily benefit constrained exploration rather than combination. Finally, we propose EvoRePE, a plug-and-play inference-time steering strategy that internalizes evolutionary search patterns to consistently enhance machine creativity.

Abstract:
Large language model post-training relies on reinforcement learning to improve model capability and alignment quality. However, the off-policy training paradigm introduces distribution shift, which often pushes the policy beyond the trust region, leading to training instabilities manifested as fluctuations in policy entropy and unstable gradients. Although PPO-Clip mitigates this issue through importance clipping, it still overlooks the global distributional shift of actions. To address these challenges, we propose using the entropy ratio between the current and previous policies as a new global metric that effectively quantifies the relative change in policy exploration throughout updates. Building on this metric, we introduce an Entropy Ratio Clipping (ERC) mechanism that imposes bidirectional constraints on the entropy ratio. This stabilizes policy updates at the global distribution level and compensates for the inability of PPO-clip to regulate probability shifts of un-sampled actions. We integrate ERC into both DAPO and GPPO reinforcement learning algorithms. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show that ERC consistently improves performance.

Abstract:
The widespread availability of large-scale code datasets has accelerated the development of code large language models (CodeLLMs), raising concerns about unauthorized dataset usage. Dataset poisoning offers a proactive defense by reducing the utility of such unauthorized training. However, existing poisoning methods often require full-dataset poisoning and introduce transformations that break code compilability. In this paper, we introduce FunPoison, a functionality-preserving poisoning approach that injects short, compilable weak-use fragments into executed code paths. FunPoison leverages reusable statement-level templates with automatic repair and conservative safety checking to ensure side-effect freedom, while a type-aware synthesis module preserves type correctness, suppresses static-analysis warnings, and improves stealth. Extensive experiments across multiple CodeLLMs and code-generation benchmarks show that FunPoison achieves effective poisoning by contaminating only 10% of the dataset, while maintaining 100% compilability and functional correctness. FunPoison also remains robust against advanced code sanitization techniques, including detection, purification, rewriting, static-analysis, and formatting defenses.

Abstract:
The Uniform Information Density (UID) hypothesis proposes that effective communication is achieved by maintaining a stable flow of information. In this work, we revisit this principle in the context of Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, asking whether step-level uniformity reflects reasoning quality. To this end, we introduce a novel framework to quantify uniformity of information flow at both local and global levels, using an entropy-based stepwise density metric. Across experiments on seven reasoning benchmarks, we see a counter-intuitive pattern: while high-quality reasoning exhibit smooth step-by-step transitions (local uniformity) and structured, non-uniform information flow at the trajectory level (global non-uniformity). The results demonstrate that these uniformities outperform alternative internal signals as predictors of reasoning quality, and such divergence with human communication is not a model deficiency, but a byproduct of distinct objectives between human communication and LLM reasoning.

Abstract:
Best-of- n sampling improves the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) and large reasoning models (LRMs) by generating multiple candidate solutions and selecting the one with the highest reward. The key challenge for reasoning tasks is designing a scoring function that can identify correct reasoning chains without access to ground-truth answers. We propose Probabilistic Confidence Selection and Ranking for Reasoning Chains (PiCSAR): a simple, training-free method that scores each candidate generation using the joint log-likelihood of the reasoning and final answer. This method utilises both the scores of the reasoning path (reasoning confidence) and the final answer (answer confidence). PiCSAR achieves substantial gains across several benchmarks ( +11.7 on AIME2024, +9.81 on AIME2025), outperforming baselines with at least 2x fewer samples in 20 out of 25 comparisons. Our analysis reveals that correct reasoning chains exhibit higher reasoning and answer confidence, justifying the effectiveness of PiCSAR.

Abstract:
Relevance and utility are two frequently used measures to evaluate the effectiveness of an information retrieval (IR) system. Relevance emphasizes the aboutness of a result to a query, while utility refers to the result’s usefulness or value to an information seeker. In Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), high-utility results should be prioritized to feed to LLMs due to their limited input bandwidth. Re-examining RAG’s three core components—relevance ranking derived from retrieval models, utility judgments, and answer generation—aligns with Schutz’s philosophical system of relevances, which encompasses three types of relevance representing different levels of human cognition that enhance each other. These three RAG components also reflect three cognitive levels for LLMs in question-answering. Therefore, we propose an Iterative utiliTy judgmEnt fraMework (ITEM) to promote each step in RAG. We conducted extensive experiments on retrieval (TREC DL, WebAP), utility judgment task (GTI-NQ), and factoid question-answering (NQ) datasets. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements of in utility judgments, ranking, and answer generation upon representative baselines.

Abstract:
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have garnered significant research interest. Despite being built upon text-based large language models (LLMs), LALMs frequently exhibit a degradation in knowledge and reasoning capabilities. We hypothesize that this limitation stems from the failure of current training paradigms to effectively bridge the acoustic-semantic gap within the feature representation space. To address this challenge, we propose CORD, a unified alignment framework that performs online cross-modal self-distillation. Specifically, it aligns audio-conditioned reasoning with its text-conditioned counterpart within a unified model. Leveraging the text modality as an internal teacher, CORD performs multi-granularity alignment throughout the audio rollout process. At the token level, it employs on-policy reverse KL divergence with importance-aware weighting to prioritize early and semantically critical tokens. At the sequence level, CORD introduces a judge-based global reward to optimize complete reasoning trajectories via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Empirical results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that CORD consistently enhances audio-conditioned reasoning and substantially bridges the audio–text performance gap with only 80k synthetic training samples, validating the efficacy and data efficiency of our on-policy, multi-level cross-modal alignment approach.

Abstract:
A key challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) is improving their Multilingual instruction-following ability over time without deteriorating their ability in languages they already excel at, typically English. In this paper, we study a two-phase Continual Fine-tuning (CFT) setup toward improving a model’s Multilingual adaptability. Concretely, we consider a two-phase CFT process in which an English-only end-to-end instruction fine-tuned LLM (Phase 1) is sequentially fine-tuned on a multilingual instruction dataset (Phase 2). Across MISTRAL-7B and LLAMA-3-8B and multiple dataset pairs, we show that instructional similarity between phases is critical: aligned datasets preserve or improve English while boosting multilingual ability, whereas misaligned datasets cause English degradation. We show that this degradation arises from representation shift during CFT, and that targeted mitigation strategies, including generative replay and heuristic-based layer freezing, reduce this shift and improve multilingual adaptation.

Abstract:
Large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in general knowledge question answering. However, their ability to handle temporal information remains limited. To address this limitation, existing approaches often design time-sensitive reasoning pipelines that rely on external tools or manual verification and are tailored to specific scenarios, leading to poor generalizability. Moreover, these methods apply a fixed pipeline to all questions, overlooking the fact that different types of temporal questions often require distinct reasoning strategies, which leads to unnecessary processing for simple cases and inadequate reasoning for more complex ones. To this end, we propose AdapTime, an adaptive temporal reasoning method that dynamically executes reasoning steps based on the input context and task requirements. Specifically, it involves three temporal reasoning actions: reformulate, rewrite and review, with an LLM planner guiding the reasoning process. AdapTime integrates seamlessly with state-of-the-art LLMs and significantly enhances their temporal reasoning capabilities without relying on external support. Extensive experiments on two temporal QA benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Tokenization plays a pivotal role in NLP and is fundamental to training language models. However, existing tokenizers are often skewed towards high-resource languages, limiting their effectiveness for linguistically diverse and morphologically rich languages such as those in the Indian subcontinent. In this work, we present a comprehensive empirical study of multilingual tokenization across 17 Indic languages spanning 11 scripts and two language families. We systematically evaluate the effects of (i) widely used subword algorithms: BPE (CITATION) and Unigram LM (CITATION), (ii) script and orthography-aware normalization, (iii) vocabulary size, and (iv) multilingual vocabulary construction strategies. We use a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations to obtain the following observations: (i) script-specific normalization improves tokenization quality, (ii) Unigram LM better preserves morphological boundaries than BPE, (iii) cluster-based vocabulary construction shows improvement in downstream tasks compared to the joint method. Our findings highlight the importance of linguistically informed design choices in multilingual tokenization and offer practical guidance for building effective tokenizers for low-resource and morphologically complex languages.

Abstract:
Speech quality assessment (SQA) is typically formulated as a score regression task based on subjective ratings, such as the Mean Opinion Score (MOS), which inherently suffer from inconsistent standards and limit cross-dataset training and evaluation. To address these limitations, we reformulate SQA as a preference-based comparison paradigm and construct MOS-Pref, a large-scale MOS-derived preference dataset. Building on MOS-Pref, we systematically implement and evaluate three reward modeling paradigms: scalar, semi-scalar, and generative reward models, alongside existing SQA approaches. Our experiments reveal three key findings: (1) scalar models achieve the strongest overall performance, consistently exceeding 74% accuracy; (2) score regression-based approaches generally underperform preference-based methods in both overall performance and generalization; and (3) all reward models struggle on pairs with very small MOS gap. Motivated by these observations, we propose a MOS-aware GRM design that incorporates MOS gap into the reward function during reinforcement learning. Experimental results show that the MOS-aware GRM significantly improves fine-grained speech quality discrimination. We hope this work fosters more rigorous and scalable research in SQA.

Abstract:
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) employing the Chain-of-Thought paradigm have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities. Though different problems naturally require varying depths of reasoning, existing methods often determine whether to perform reasoning, lacking fine-grained mechanisms to adapt reasoning length to problem complexity. As a result, LALMs often adopt a one-size-fits-all reasoning strategy, leading to redundant overthinking for simple tasks and insufficient reasoning for complex ones. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of LALM reasoning behavior and argue that effective and efficient reasoning should be adaptively aligned with task difficulty. To this end, we propose a difficulty-adaptive reasoning method for LALMs. Specifically, we introduce a reward function that dynamically links reasoning length to the model’s perceived problem difficulty, encouraging shorter reasoning for easy tasks and longer reasoning for more complex ones. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate that our method consistently improves performance while reducing average reasoning length by at least 50%, achieving higher efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.

Abstract:
Diagnostic prediction and clinical reasoning are critical tasks in healthcare applications. While large language models have shown strong capabilities in commonsense reasoning, they still struggle with diagnostic reasoning due to limited domain knowledge. Existing approaches often rely on internal model knowledge or static knowledge bases, which are insufficient to support the knowledge demands of diagnostic reasoning. Moreover, these methods focus solely on the accuracy of final predictions, overlooking alignment with standard clinical reasoning trajectories. To this end, we propose MultiDx, a two-stage diagnostic reasoning framework that performs differential diagnosis by analyzing evidence collected from multiple knowledge sources. Specifically, it first generates suspected diagnoses and reasoning traces by leveraging knowledge from web search, SOAP-formatted case, and clinical case database. Then it integrates multi-perspective evidence through matching, voting, and differential diagnosis to generate the final prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a central approach for improving the reasoning ability of large language models. Recent work studies RLVR through token entropy, arguing that high-entropy tokens drive exploration and should receive stronger updates. However, they overlook the fact that most of a reasoning trajectory consists of low-entropy segments that encode stable and reusable structural patterns. Through qualitative and quantitative analyses, we find that the overlap of low-entropy segments across correct responses strongly correlates with model accuracy, while overlaps involving incorrect responses exhibit stable but unproductive patterns. Motivated by these findings, we propose LESS, a correctness-aware reinforcement framework that performs fine-grained advantage modulation over low-entropy segments. LESS amplifies segments unique to correct responses, suppresses those unique to incorrect ones, and neutralizes segments shared by both, while preserving high-entropy exploration in the underlying RL algorithm. Instantiated on top of GRPO and GSPO, LESS not only improves accuracy over strong RL baselines across three backbones and six math benchmarks, but also achieves stronger robustness of the performance floor.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Text-to-SQL parsing, achieving remarkable success in static, single-turn query generation. However, a significant disparity remains between these academic benchmarks and real-world utility. In practical applications, such as financial auditing or business analytics, user intents are rarely static; they evolve dynamically through iterative refinement, necessitating not just information retrieval (SELECT) but continuous state manipulation (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE). To bridge this gap, we introduce DySQL-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate LLMs within a dynamic interaction framework. Unlike varying manual curation efforts, DySQL-Bench employs a two-stage automated synthesis pipeline: transforming raw relational schemas into hierarchical logic trees to generate user-database interactions, followed by a rigorous verify-and-refine protocol that ensures 100% distinct correctness via human expert validation. We further propose an interactive evaluation environment simulating a triadic workflow involving an LLM-simulated user, the agent under test, and an executable database system. Spanning 13 diverse domains with 1,072 complex tasks, our experiments reveal that current powerful models struggle in this realistic setting. Notably, GPT-4o achieves only 58.34% overall accuracy and a meager 23.81% on the strict Pass^5 metric, highlighting the substantial challenges DySQL-Bench poses for the future of database agents.

Abstract:
While large audio language models (LALMs) have driven significant progress in multimodal conversational systems, current benchmarks suffer from critical limitations: they are largely English-centric, use synthetic speech, and fail to provide comprehensive, discriminative evaluation across key dimensions. To fill this gap, we present Voice Chat Bot Bench (VCB Bench), a novel, high-quality Chinese benchmark built exclusively on real human speech. VCB Bench assesses LALMs across three complementary axes: instruction following (including speech-level control beyond text commands), knowledge understanding (including general knowledge, reasoning, and daily dialogue), and robustness (evaluating stability under variations in content, environment, and speaker characteristics). Experiments conducted on representative LALMs reveal notable performance disparities and offer tangible insights for future improvements. VCB Bench serves as a reproducible and fine-grained framework, providing standardized evaluation and practical guidance for the development of Chinese voice conversational models.

Abstract:
Research on hate speech detection (HSD) has centered on modern data, even though offensive language has a much longer history. This paper presents the first systematic evaluation of instruction-tuned LLMs on Early Modern English invectives, compared with a modern hate-speech benchmark. Our work applies a modular prompt design to measure the contribution of definitional richness, contextual grounding, decision rules and few-shot examples. The results indicate that clearer annotation boundaries in the curated historical corpus lead to higher classification performance compared to the modern benchmark, despite the disadvantage of linguistic unfamiliarity. Prompt brittleness, however, persists across both domains. Classification-oriented components (rules, examples) drive the strongest effects, while definitional or contextual additions matter less. Fine-tuned encoder models still outperform LLMs, but some prompt configurations can narrow the gap. Overall, our study provides practical guidance for prompt design in both digital humanities and HSD and new opportunities for tracing the historical development of hate speech.

Abstract:
High-quality mathematical and logical datasets with verifiable answers are essential for strengthening the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While recent data augmentation techniques have facilitated the creation of large-scale benchmarks, existing LLM-generated datasets often suffer from limited reliability, diversity, and scalability. To address these challenges, we introduce PuzzleClone, a formal framework for synthesizing verifiable data at scale using a novel DSL-driven approach. Our approach features three key innovations: (1) encoding seed puzzles into structured logical specifications, (2) generating scalable variants through systematic variable and constraint randomization, and (3) ensuring validity via a reproduction mechanism. Applying PuzzleClone, we construct PC-83K, a benchmark comprising over 83K diverse and programmatically validated puzzles. The generated puzzles span a wide spectrum of difficulty and formats, posing significant challenges to current state-of-the-art models. Experimental results show that post training (SFT and RL) on PC-83K yields substantial improvements not only on the testset but also on various logic and mathematical benchmarks. Post training raises average performance on PC-83K from 14.5 to 66.0 and delivers consistent improvements across 7 logic and mathematical benchmarks up to 18.4 absolute percentage points (SATBench from 51.6 to 70.0). Our code and data are available at https://github.com/HiThink-Research/PuzzleClone.

Abstract:
Confidence estimation is essential when LLMs are used for classification, indicating when predictions can be trusted. However, common approaches such as verbalization produce extremely sparse outputs. For instance, Qwen3-32B verbalizes only eight unique confidence values on SST-2, with over half being exactly 95%—a pattern we observe consistently across four datasets and two LLMs. Besides limiting practical utility, we show that this sparsity critically affects evaluation: the choice of interpolation in area under the accuracy-rejection curve (AUARC) dramatically alters rankings, with consistency sampling dropping from best to worst under stepwise versus linear interpolation. We advocate for standardizing stepwise interpolation for a fairer comparison. Under such a fair evaluation, we find that weighting verbalized digits by token probabilities—a method we term verbalization logprobs—addresses sparsity and achieves the best AUARC (+2.3 points over vanilla verbalization) without incurring additional inference cost.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Text-to-SQL have greatly benefited from large language models, yet small and medium-sized models still suffer from frequent execution errors and limited self-correction ability. We present ReSQL (Retrieval-augmented error reasoning for Text-to-SQL), a self-improving framework that generates and learns from its own error-reasoning dataset, enabling models to autonomously refine their SQL generation and correction capabilities. ReSQL combines feedback-driven fine-tuning with retrieval-based inference: it gathers model-generated errors, analyzes them through structured feedback prompts, and retrieves relevant correction examples during inference. This unified approach allows models to internalize robust error-reasoning patterns and dynamically apply them to unseen queries. Experimental results on the SPIDER and BIRD benchmarks show that ReSQL substantially improves execution accuracy and self-correction ability over strong baselines, achieving competitive performance with much larger proprietary models such as GPT-4. Our findings highlight ReSQL as a promising step toward self-improving, reasoning-aware Text-to-SQL systems that can continually enhance their reliability and interpretability without external supervision. All code and generated reasoning datasets are available to facilitate application to open-source LLMs and reproducible baseline training.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in machine translation on high-resource language pairs, yet their performance on low-resource translation still lags behind. Existing post-training methods rely heavily on high-quality parallel data, which are often scarce or unavailable for low-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce WALAR, a reinforcement training method using only monolingual text to elevate LLMs’ translation capabilities on massive low-resource languages while retaining their performance on high-resource languages. Our key insight is based on the observation of failure modes (or "holes") in existing source-based multilingual quality estimation (QE) models. Reinforcement learning (RL) using these QE models tends to amplify such holes, resulting in poorer multilingual LLMs. We develop techniques including word alignment and language alignment to mitigate such holes in WALAR’s reward for RL training. We continually trained an LLM supporting translation of 101 languages using WALAR. The experiments show that our new model outperforms LLaMAX, one of the strongest open-source multilingual LLMs by a large margin on 1,414 language directions on Flores-101 dataset.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for transferring the superior reasoning capabilities of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) to efficient student models. However, the raw Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories are often verbose and redundant, which dilutes the underlying logic and hinders effective knowledge distillation for student models. Although recent work has focused on pruning CoT to streamline these reasoning paths, existing local heuristic methods often fail to capture global causal logic due to rigid rules and limited search spaces, while global heuristic approaches incur substantial computational costs. To address these issues, we propose Pru-CoT (Pruning Chain-of-Thought), a framework that aims to extract the essential logical structure from reasoning chains. Pru-CoT implements a step-level importance assessment via global optimization on a frozen student large language model (LLM), quantifying the gradient-based causal contribution of each component. Guided by these important signals, the framework performs fidelity-constrained pruning, utilizing an LLM-driven process to synthesize concise, logically coherent narratives. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that models trained with Pru-CoT not only achieve superior accuracy but also generate significantly more compact reasoning paths compared to those trained on raw verbose data.

Abstract:
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) towards autonomous agents has catalyzed progress in Deep Research. While retrieval capabilities are well-benchmarked, the post-retrieval synthesis stage—where agents must digest massive amounts of context and consolidate fragmented evidence into coherent, long-form reports—remains under-evaluated due to the subjectivity of open-ended writing.To bridge this gap, we introduce DeepSynth-Eval, a benchmark designed to objectively evaluate information consolidation capabilities. We leverage high-quality survey papers as gold standards, reverse-engineer research requests, and construct Oracle Contexts from their bibliographies to isolate synthesis from retrieval noise. We propose a fine-grained evaluation protocol using General Checklists (for factual coverage) and Constraint Checklists (for structural organization), transforming subjective judgment into verifiable metrics. Experiments across 96 tasks reveal that synthesizing information from hundreds of references remains a significant challenge. Our results demonstrate that agentic "plan-then-write" workflows significantly outperform single-turn generation, effectively reducing hallucinations and improving adherence to complex structural constraints.

Abstract:
Prompt optimizers are widely used to create high-quality prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs), but their effectiveness remains unstable in practice. This instability is caused by the misalignment between conservative needs (e.g., safety compliance) and open-ended goals (e.g., creative writing). To address this, we propose a semantic-entropy-based method, using task uncertainty to guide prompt optimization. Specifically, we measure the task’s uncertainty level with pre-defined templates, then use this measure to direct prompt optimization: selecting high-entropy prompt candidates for creative tasks and low-entropy candidates for conservative ones. Extensive experiments across various model families demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms baselines by effectively adjusting entropy levels. Our approach requires no training, works with black-box models, and integrates easily into existing prompt optimizers.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used across the scientific workflow, including to draft peer-review reports. However, many AI-generated reviews are superficial and insufficiently actionable, leaving authors without concrete, implementable guidance and motivating the gap this work addresses. We propose RbtAct, which targets actionable review feedback generation and places existing peer review rebuttal at the center of learning. Rebuttals show which reviewer comments led to concrete revisions or specific plans, and which were only defended. Building on this insight, we leverage rebuttal as implicit supervision to directly optimize a feedback generator for actionability. To support this objective, we propose a new task called perspective-conditioned segment-level review feedback generation, in which the model is required to produce a single focused comment based on the complete paper and a specified perspective such as experiments and writing. We also build a large dataset named RMR-75K that maps review segments to the rebuttal segments that address them, with perspective labels and impact categories that order author uptake. We then train the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model with supervised fine-tuning on review segments followed by preference optimization using rebuttal derived pairs. Experiments with human experts and LLM-as-a-judge show consistent gains in actionability and specificity over strong baselines while maintaining grounding and relevance.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at factual retrieval, they often struggle with the "curse of two-hop reasoning" in compositional tasks. Recent research suggests that parameter-sharing transformers can bridge this gap by forming a "Generalization Circuit" during a prolonged "grokking" phase. A fundamental question arises: Is a grokked model truly superior to its non-grokked counterparts? Furthermore, is the extensive computational cost of waiting for the grokking phase worthwhile? In this work, we conduct a mechanistic study to evaluate the Generalization Circuit’s role in knowledge assimilation and transfer. We demonstrate that: (i) The inference paths established by non-grokked and grokked models for in-distribution compositional queries are identical. This suggests that the "Generalization Circuit" does not represent the sudden acquisition of a new reasoning paradigm. Instead, we argue that grokking is the process of integrating memorized atomic facts into an easy-acquire, naturally established reasoning path. (ii) Achieving high accuracy on unseen cases after prolonged training and the formation of a certain reasoning path are not bound; they can occur independently under specific data regimes. (iii) Even a mature circuit exhibits limited transferability when integrating new knowledge, suggesting that "grokked" Transformers do not achieve a full mastery of compositional logic.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a core technique for improving the factuality and reasoning ability of large language models. Recent efforts extend RAG with graph-structured knowledge, enhancing retrieval to capture relational context beyond isolated text chunks. However, many graph-based RAG systems rely on a two-stage pipeline: (i) classical approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search to identify top- k entities in the embedding space, (ii) heuristic neighbor expansion which augments the retrieved set by traversing immediate neighbors. This design underutilizes graph topology during retrieval and often introduces noisy or high-degree neighbors, leading to suboptimal evidence selection. In this paper, we propose TopoRAG, a retrieval framework that directly integrates structural constraints into ANN search via a diameter-constrained formulation. By selecting entities whose induced subgraph satisfies a diameter bound, TopoRAG enables topology-aware and noise-controlled graph retrieval. Experiments show that our approach consistently improves precision and significantly reduces context redundancy compared to existing methods.

Abstract:
We present PictoEduca, the first large-scale Spanish text-to-pictogram dataset for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), derived from primary educational materials and grounded in the ARASAAC pictogram repository. The dataset is released with a reproducible pipeline that combines automatic annotation with targeted expert correction, supporting scalable and high-quality corpus construction. We benchmark a rule-based system (ARAWORD) and neural models (T5, LLaMA) under direct text-to-pictogram and two-stage text-to-concept-to-pictogram settings. Results show that the rule-based system remains a strong baseline, while neural models benefit from explicit semantic abstraction, with the two-stage approach improving semantic coherence and reducing ambiguity. We further explore data selection strategies, demonstrating that combining domain similarity with a quality signal yields higher-quality silver data, reduces annotation effort, and improves model performance in low-resource regimes. PictoEduca enables reproducible evaluation and advances Spanish text-to-pictogram research.

Abstract:
Vision evaluations are typically done through multi-step processes. In most contemporary fields, experts analyze images using structured, evidence-based adaptive questioning. In plant pathology, botanists inspect leaf images, identify visual cues, infer diagnostic intent, and probe further with targeted questions that adapt to species, symptoms, and severity. This structured probing is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and treatment formulation. Yet current vision-language models are evaluated on single-turn question answering. To address this gap, we introduce PlantInquiryVQA, a benchmark for studying multi-step, intent-driven visual reasoning in botanical diagnosis. We formalize a Chain of Inquiry framework modeling diagnostic trajectories as ordered question-answer sequences conditioned on grounded visual cues and explicit epistemic intent. We release a dataset of 24,964 expert-curated plant images and 138,078 question-answer pairs annotated with visual grounding, severity labels, and domain-specific reasoning templates. Evaluations on top-tier Multimodal Large Language Models reveal that while they describe visual symptoms adequately, they struggle with safe clinical reasoning and accurate diagnosis. Importantly, structured question-guided inquiry significantly improves diagnostic correctness, reduces hallucination, and increases reasoning efficiency. PlantInquiryVQA provides a foundation for training diagnostic agents that reason like expert botanists rather than static classifiers.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, yet they often struggle when dealing with complex, ill-formed, or noisy inputs that frequently occur in interactions with real users. LLMs typically lack crucial refining capabilities needed to filter out irrelevant details, restructure key points before reasoning over the text and responding, resulting in suboptimal performance and incorrect answers. From an information theory perspective, this behavior is akin to decoding a high-entropy problem without first reducing its entropy. In this work, we first introduce GSM-Noise, a benchmark featuring grade-school math problems systematically perturbed to reflect real-world input variability. We show that the reasoning ability of open-source models (e.g., LLaMA and Qwen series) can be compromised by noise, while closed-source models are more robust. To improve LLM robustness under noisy conditions, we propose that LLMs first refine inputs — thereby reducing their entropy — before engaging in in-depth analysis. We investigate three approaches to instill this refinement capability: prompt engineering (PE), supervised finetuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL). Experimental results show that input refinement leads to consistent performance gains: 2–12% with PE, 4–13% with SFT, and 3–25% with RL. These results highlight the importance of incorporating an explicit refinement phase to enhance the robustness and reliability of LLM reasoning in real-world scenarios.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress in radiology by integrating visual perception with natural language understanding. However, they often generate clinically unsupported descriptions, known as medical hallucinations, which pose serious risks in medical applications that demand accuracy and image-grounded outputs. Through empirical analysis, we find that prompt-induced hallucinations remain prevalent in radiology MLLMs, largely due to over-sensitivity to clinical sections. To address this, we introduce Clinical Contrastive Decoding (CCD), a training-free and retrieval-free inference framework that integrates structured clinical signals from task-specific radiology expert models. CCD introduces a dual-stage contrastive mechanism to refine token-level logits during generation, thereby enhancing clinical fidelity without modifying the base MLLM. Experiments on three datasets and multiple models demonstrate that CCD consistently improves overall performance on radiology report generation (RRG). On the MIMIC-CXR dataset, it yields up to a 17% improvement in RadGraph-F1 when applied to state-of-the-art RRG models. Our approach provides a lightweight and generalisable solution for mitigating medical hallucinations, effectively bridging expert models and MLLMs in radiology.

Abstract:
Modern instruction-following language models are optimized to be helpful and cooperative, often through preference-based alignment such as RLHF and related methods. A growing body of evidence shows that this training can also induce sycophancy: models may agree with a user even when the user is wrong, undermining reliability in decision support and high-stakes advice. We introduce SycoBench-600, a controlled multiple-choice benchmark that measures (i) susceptibility to three social-pressure perturbations (doubt, authority, and an explicit wrong suggestion) and (ii) correction selectivity, the ability to accept correct suggestions while resisting incorrect ones. The released benchmark contains 600 English MCQ instances over 272 normalized question stems, covers 8 domains and 3 difficulty tiers, and evaluates each instance under 3 fixed paraphrase variants of the perturbation prompts. We evaluate seven widely used assistants spanning proprietary and open-weight families. Results show substantial variation in pressure robustness and selective updating, and further show that willingness to update does not by itself imply selectivity. We release raw logs, validation scripts, and code that regenerates every table and figure from the model outputs.

Abstract:
There has been a growing interest in translating C code to Rust due to Rust’s robust memory and thread safety guarantees. Tools such as C2Rust enable syntax-guided transpilation from C to semantically equivalent Rust code. However, the resulting Rust programs often rely heavily on unsafe constructs, particularly raw pointers, which undermines Rust’s safety guarantees. This paper aims to improve the memory safety of Rust programs generated by C2Rust by eliminating raw pointers. Specifically, we propose a raw pointer rewriting technique that lifts raw pointers in individual functions to appropriate Rust data structures. Technically, PR2 employs decision-tree-based prompting to guide the pointer lifting process. It also leverages code change analysis to guide the repair of errors introduced during rewriting, effectively addressing errors encountered during compilation and test case execution.We implement PR2 and evaluate it using gpt-4o-mini on 28 real-world C projects. It is shown that PR2 successfully eliminates 18.57% of local raw pointers across these projects, significantly enhancing the safety of the translated Rust code. On average, PR2 completes the transformation of a project in 5.02 hours, at a cost of 1.13. Our code is available at https://github.com/bhcsayx/PR2.

Abstract:
Chart-to-table translation converts chart images into structured tabular data. Accurate translation is crucial for Multimodal Language Modal (MLM) to answer complex queries. We observe imbalances in the number of images across different aspects of the y-axis information in public chart datasets. Such imbalances can introduce unintended biases, causing uneven MLM performance. Previous works have not systematically examined these biases. To address this gap, we propose a new framework, FairChart2Table, for analyzing y-axis-related bias on five state-of-the-art models.Key Findings: (1) There are significant y-axis biases related to the digit length of the major tick values, the number of major ticks, the range of values, and the tick value format (e.g., abbreviation or scientific format). (2) The number of legends/entities in chart images impacts MLM performance. (3) Prompting MLM with y-axis information can significantly enhance the performance for some MLMs.

Abstract:
Can unified vision–language models (VLMs) perform forward dynamics prediction (FDP), i.e., predicting the future state (in image form) given the previous observation and an action (in language form)? We find that VLMs struggle to generate physically plausible transitions between frames from instructions. Nevertheless, we identify a crucial asymmetry in multimodal grounding: fine-tuning a VLM to learn inverse dynamics prediction (IDP)—effectively captioning the action between frames—is significantly easier than learning FDP. In turn, IDP can be used to bootstrap FDP through two main strategies: 1) weakly supervised learning from synthetic data and 2) inference time verification. Firstly, IDP can annotate actions for unlabelled pairs of video frame observations to expand the training data scale for FDP. Secondly, IDP can assign rewards to multiple samples of FDP to score them, effectively guiding search at inference time. We evaluate the FDP resulting from both strategies through the task of action-centric image editing on Aurora-Bench with two families of VLMs. Despite remaining general-purpose, our best model achieves a performance competitive with state-of-the-art image editing models, improving on them by a margin of 15% on real-world subsets according to GPT4o-as-judge, and achieving the best average human evaluation across all subsets of Aurora-Bench.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) remains unreliable in specialized domains due to semantic and lexical mismatch between lay queries and professional terminology, and existing generative expansion often introduces redundancy or hallucinations that cause semantic drift. We propose Generative Query Condensation (GQC), a query rewriting strategy that reframes rewriting as semantic condensation rather than expansion. To operationalize GQC, we introduce Query-to-Entity Inference (Q2EI), an entity-centric rewriting method that realizes semantic condensation through explicit inference of the underlying target entity. By moving semantic alignment from retrieval-time vector matching to the rewriting stage, Q2EI produces information-dense query representations. Experimental results on medical and legal benchmarks show that Q2EI consistently outperforms strong baselines across retrievers, improving retrieval effectiveness while substantially reducing rewriting token consumption compared to generative expansion methods. Further analysis confirms that these gains primarily arise from accurate entity inference, and that Q2EI’s semantic condensation design limits error amplification when inference is imperfect, leading to more stable and interpretable retrieval behavior.

Abstract:
Recent work has increasingly explored neuron-level interpretation in vision-language models (VLMs) to identify neurons critical to final predictions. However, existing neuron analyses generally focus on single tasks, limiting the comparability of neuron importance across tasks. Moreover, ranking strategies tend to score neurons in isolation, overlooking how task-dependent information pathways shape the write-in effects of feed-forward network (FFN) neurons. This oversight can exacerbate neuron polysemanticity in multi-task settings, introducing noise into the identification and intervention of task-critical neurons. In this study, we propose HONES (Head-Oriented Neuron Explanation Steering), a gradient-free framework for task-aware neuron attribution and steering in multi-task VLMs. HONES ranks FFN neurons by their causal write-in contributions conditioned on task-relevant attention heads, and further modulates salient neurons via lightweight scaling. Experiments on four diverse multimodal tasks and two popular VLMs show that HONES outperforms existing methods in identifying task-critical neurons and improves model performance after steering. Our source code is released at: https://github.com/petergit1/HONES.

Abstract:
Visually Grounded Document Question Answering often lacks robust, end-to-end solutions capable of handling complex, multi-answer queries without reliance on ad-hoc processing. In this work, we propose two turnkey LLM architectures to address this gap. We first introduce a single-head architecture where coordinates are represented as special tokens within the unified vocabulary. While structurally robust, this approach suffers from the limitations of discrete supervision; to address this, we propose a novel “softening token” method that enables differentiable Mean-Squared-Error loss over token probabilities. Although this significantly improves visual grounding, the spatial precision remains bound by discretization. Consequently, we propose a second solution: a dual-head architecture that alternates between text generation and regression-based bounding box prediction. This method offers high spatial precision via a regression head, further stabilized by our introduction of an Intersection-over-Union loss. Finally, by combining the single head model’s structural robustness with the high precision of the dual head model, we propose an ensemble method that yields significant performance gains beyond each of individual components.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit “contextual disregard” when faced with input evidence that conflicts with their internal parametric memory, leading to persistent factual hallucinations. Existing mitigation strategies primarily rely on suppressing specific neuron activations or employing computationally expensive contrastive decoding mechanisms, which often result in increased perplexity or significantly elevated inference latency. To address these limitations, we propose Resonant Context Anchoring (RCA), a lightweight inference-time intervention method grounded in the perspective of residual stream signal dynamics. RCA aims to resolve the signal attenuation of external evidence during its propagation through deep networks. The core mechanism involves the orthogonal decoupling of routing logic and information magnitude within the self-attention module. By utilizing raw pre-softmax attention scores as an instantaneous metric of semantic alignment, we construct a dynamic gain field via non-linear rectification to selectively amplify the norms of value vectors corresponding to context tokens, without altering the attention probability distribution. This mechanism effectively elevates the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of input evidence within the residual stream mixture, thereby robustly anchoring the generation trajectory to the truthful context during inference. Extensive experiments on the Llama-3 model series demonstrate that RCA significantly improves contextual faithfulness across multiple factual consistency and strong knowledge-conflict tasks, effectively suppressing parametric hallucinations. Furthermore, results confirm that as a training-free and computationally negligible plug-and-play module, RCA achieves a Pareto improvement in faithfulness and fluency while maintaining the model’s general language understanding capabilities. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RCA-Implementation-D8B5

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in single-image understanding, yet effective reasoning across multiple images remains challenging. We identify a critical capability gap in existing multi-image alignment approaches: current methods focus primarily on localized reasoning with pre-specified image indices (“Look at Image 3 and...”), bypassing the essential skills of global visual search and autonomous cross-image comparison. To address this limitation, we introduce a Simple-to-Hard (S2H) learning framework that systematically constructs multi-image preference data across three hierarchical reasoning levels requiring an increasing level of capabilities: (1) single-image localized reasoning, (2) multi-image localized comparison, and (3) global visual search. Unlike prior work that relies on model-specific attributes, such as hallucinations or attention heuristics, to generate preference pairs, our approach leverages prompt-driven complexity to create chosen/rejected pairs that are applicable across different models. Through extensive evaluations on LLaVA and Qwen-VL models, we show that our diverse multi-image reasoning data significantly enhances multi-image reasoning performance, yielding significant improvements over baseline methods across benchmarks. Importantly, our approach maintains strong single-image reasoning performance while simultaneously strengthening multi-image understanding capabilities, thus advancing the state of the art for holistic visual preference alignment.

Abstract:
In Large Language Model post-training, high-quality data effectively enhances model performance with fine-tuning, highlighting the need to identify high-quality and beneficial fine-tuning data. However, one of the most popular data valuation paradigms, influence function and its variants, are computationally expensive due to their reliance on inverse Hessian-Vector Products (iHVP) computations that scale poorly with increasing model size. To examine whether influence values correlate with efficiently computable intrinsic features, we empirically investigate the distribution of top influential data for the model in fine-tuning, and observe that data with high influence tend to be those with high predictive uncertainty. Yet such highly uncertain samples exhibit a dual nature, which can be either beneficial or detrimental noisy data. Unlike traditional methods that treat uncertainty as a standalone criterion, we introduce a directional indicator to rigorously disentangle these opposing effects. Formally, we propose EULoInf (Entropy-based Uncertainty-aware Lookahead Influence), a computationally efficient valuation framework. By approximating influence via uncertainty and gradient based validation loss lookahead, EULoInf avoids iHVP computation, effectively reducing the iHVP-induced quadratic complexity in model parameters to linear time. We rigorously derive our framework from the influence function. Empirically, it matches or even outperforms prior methods across diverse data valuation tasks and LLM architectures, including mislabel detection and data selection, while reducing computational time and memory usage by over 50%.

Abstract:
Generative spoken language models pretrained on large-scale raw audio can continue a speech prompt with appropriate content while preserving attributes like speaker and emotion, serving as foundation models for spoken dialogue. In prior literature, these models are often evaluated using “global token perplexity”, which directly applies the text perplexity formulation to speech tokens. However, this practice overlooks fundamental differences between speech and text modalities, possibly leading to an underestimation of the speech characteristics. In this work, we propose a variety of likelihood- and generative-based evaluation methods that serve in place of naive global token perplexity. We demonstrate that the proposed evaluations more faithfully reflect perceived generation quality, as evidenced by stronger correlations with human-rated mean opinion scores (MOS). When assessed under the new metrics, the relative performance landscape of spoken language models is reshaped, revealing a significantly reduced gap between the best-performing model and the human topline. Together, these results suggest that appropriate evaluation is critical for accurately assessing progress in spoken language modeling.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong capability in understanding and simulating humans’ decisions, suggesting a new way to use LLMs as tools to study social systems. We study two-sided-matching markets, such as dating and job matching. Classical matching models assume deterministic, strict preferences, which violate real-world setting. We focus on stable matching under stochastic decision behavior and use LLMs to simulate human-like preferences and probabilistic choice patterns. Based on this, we introduce Expected Blocking Pairs (EBP), a continuous measure to quantify stability that generalizes the classic blocking pair notion. We further propose a Hybrid GS–LLM matching method that integrates the celebrated Gale–Shapley (GS) algorithm with probabilistic acceptance decisions. Experiments show that the proposed hybrid method outperforms classical baselines in terms of stability, suggesting that LLMs provide a principled tool for modeling human decisions and for improving robustness of matching under uncertainty.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have enabled general-purpose systems to demonstrate promising capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, including those in the medical domain. However, their evaluation has predominantly focused on high-resource languages, leaving low-resource contexts like Bangla underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce BanglaMedVQA, a multilingual Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset comprising clinically validated image–question–answer pairs, along with a comprehensive evaluation of current LVLMs on this resource. We rigorously evaluate nine state-of-the-art LVLMs using zero-shot, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and LoRA fine-tuning strategies. Our results reveal a clear performance disparity: models perform well on generalized visual tasks but struggle with fine-grained diagnostic reasoning, achieving surprisingly low accuracy in specialized categories. While fine-tuning significantly improves overall accuracy, especially for Qwen2.5-VL and MedGemma 4B, limitations in specialized medical reasoning persist. Our work provides a foundation for future research in Bangla medical VQA.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled agents to tackle complex embodied tasks through environmental interaction. However, these agents still make suboptimal decisions and perform ineffective actions, as they often overlook critical environmental feedback that differs from their internal beliefs. Through a formal probing analysis, we characterize this as belief inertia , a phenomenon where agents stubbornly adhere to prior beliefs despite explicit observations. To address this, we advocate active belief intervention, moving from passive understanding to active management. We introduce the Estimate-Verify-Update ( EVU ) mechanism, which empowers agents to predict expected outcomes, verify them against observations through explicit reasoning, and actively update prior beliefs based on the verification evidence. EVU is designed as a unified intervention mechanism that generates textual belief states explicitly, and can be integrated into both prompting-based and training-based agent reasoning methods. Extensive experiments across three embodied benchmarks demonstrate that EVU consistently yields substantial gains in task success rates. Further analyses validate that our approach effectively mitigates belief inertia, advancing the development of more robust embodied agents. Our code is available at https://github.com/WangHanLinHenry/EVU.

Abstract:
In the realm of domain-specific natural language understanding (NLU) tasks, acquiring high-quality labeled data is often arduous, thereby posing significant challenges for effective model training. Multi-task learning (MTL) addresses these limitations by jointly optimizing multiple tasks within a unified framework. In this paper, we introduce a novel sparse NLU multi-task learning framework that decomposes the language model into modular skill components and employs a dynamic, learnable skill-combination mechanism to adaptively handle diverse tasks. Extensive experiments on benchmark NLU datasets demonstrate that our proposed method surpasses conventional multi-task learning approaches in performance.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in contact-center Quality Assurance (QA) to automate agent performance evaluation and coaching feedback. While LLMs offer unprecedented scalability and speed, their reliance on web-scale training data raises concerns regarding demographic and behavioral biases that may distort workforce assessment. We present a counterfactual fairness evaluation of LLM-based QA systems across 13 dimensions spanning three categories: Identity, Context, and Behavioral Style. Fairness is quantified using the Counterfactual Flip Rate (CFR), the frequency of binary judgment reversals, and the Mean Absolute Score Difference (MASD), the average shift in coaching or confidence scores across counterfactual pairs. Evaluating 18 LLMs on 3,000 real-world contact center transcripts, we find systematic disparities, with CFR ranging from 5.4% to 13.0% and consistent MASD shifts across confidence, positive, and improvement scores. Larger, more strongly aligned models show lower unfairness, though fairness does not track accuracy. Contextual priming of historical performance induces the most severe degradations (CFR up to 16.4%), while implicit linguistic identity cues remain a persistent bias source. Finally, we analyze the efficacy of fairness-aware prompting, finding that explicit instructions yield only modest improvements in evaluative consistency. Our findings underscore the need for standardized fairness auditing pipelines prior to deploying LLMs in high-stakes workforce evaluation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong mathematical reasoning when trained on high-quality Chain-of-Thought (CoT) that articulates intermediate steps, yet costly CoT curation hinders further progress. While existing remedies such as distillation from stronger LLMs and self-synthesis based on test-time search alleviate this issue, they often suffer from diminishing returns or high computing overhead. In this work, we propose CoTEvol, a genetic evolutionary framework that casts CoT generation as a population-based search over reasoning trajectories. Candidate trajectories are iteratively evolved through reflective global crossover at the trajectory level and local mutation guided by uncertainty at the step level, enabling holistic recombination and fine-grained refinement. Lightweight, task-aware fitness functions are designed to guide the evolutionary process toward accurate and diverse reasoning. Empirically, improves correct-CoT synthesis success by over 30% and enhances structural diversity, with markedly improved efficiency. LLMs trained on these evolutionary CoT data achieve an average gain of 6.6% across eight math benchmarks, outperforming previous distillation and self-synthesis approaches. These results underscore the promise of evolutionary CoT synthesis as a scalable and effective method for mathematical reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Exposing latent lexical overlap, script romanization has emerged as an effective strategy for improving cross-lingual transfer (XLT) in multilingual language models (mLMs). Most prior work, however, focused on setups that favor romanization the most: (1) transfer from high-resource Latin-script to low-resource non-Latin-script languages and/or (2) between genealogically closely related languages with different scripts. It thus remains unclear whether romanization is a good representation choice for pretraining general-purpose mLMs, or, more precisely, if information loss associated with romanization harms performance for high-resource languages. We address this gap by pretraining encoder LMs from scratch on both romanized and original texts for six typologically diverse high-resource languages, investigating two potential sources of degradation: (i) loss of script-specific information and (ii) dilution of language-specific representations from increased subword overlap. Using two romanizers with different fidelity profiles, we observe negligible performance loss for languages with segmental scripts, whereas languages with morphosyllabic scripts (Chinese and Japanese) suffer degradation that higher-fidelity romanization mitigates but cannot fully recover. Importantly, comparing monolingual LMs with their mLM counterpart, we find no evidence that increased subword overlap dilutes language-specific representations. We further show that romanization improves encoding efficiency (i.e., fertility) for segmental scripts at a negligible performance cost.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in open-ended creative generation, they notably struggle with Format-Constrained Generation tasks—such as poetry and lyrics—where strict adherence to multidimensional structural constraints (i.e., format, phonetics, and rhyme) is prerequisite to aesthetic value. Existing paradigms predominantly rely on unreliable prompting or rigid constrained decoding strategies; the former often fails to ensure compliance, while the latter compromises inference latency and disrupts the natural probability distribution, degrading generation quality. To bridge this gap, we establish CCP-Arena, a rigorous testbed for Chinese Classical Poetry, and proposeProgressive Structural Internalization (PSI) a novel framework designed to embed external constraints into the model’s intrinsic intuition. PSI initiates withStructural Scaffolding via Explicit Cognitive Planning, utilizing explicit template to provide a structural scaffold for subsequent generation. This is followed by a Cascaded Reinforcement Learning stage guided by a Holistic Reward Model, which optimizes for precise structural-semantic alignment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PSI achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing baselines in both strict constraint adherence and literary aesthetics. Furthermore, mechanistic analysis confirms that our method effectively internalizes structural information into the model’s latent representations, offering a robust and efficient solution for constrained creative generation.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been widely adopted to enhance large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge. However, the two main existing paradigms struggle with multi-hop reasoning: aggregate-first approaches suffer from high construction costs and limited adaptability to dynamic knowledge, while dynamic-first approaches rely heavily on LLM reasoning and are prone to error propagation across reasoning steps. To address these limitations, we propose SR-RAG, a symbolic reasoning framework for multi-hop question answering. SR-RAG integrates the advantages of both paradigms by dynamically generating sub-questions, performing information retrieval and symbolic encoding based on an on-the-fly graph, and using a symbolic verifier to formally validate intermediate reasoning steps to ensure the correctness of intermediate answers and the completeness of the reasoning chain . We evaluate SR-RAG on multiple multi-hop benchmarks and a medical dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that it significantly improves both accuracy and robustness.

Abstract:
Scaling test-time compute via Long Chain-of-Thought (Long-CoT) significantly enhances reasoning capabilities, yet extended generation does not guarantee correctness: after an early wrong commitment, models may keep elaborating a self-consistent but incorrect prefix. Through fine-grained trajectory analysis, we identify Thinking Traps, prefix-dominant deadlocks where later reflection, alternative attempts, or verification fails to revise the root error. On a curated subset of DAPO-MATH, 89% of failures exhibit such traps. To solve this problem, we introduce TAAR (Trap-Aware Adaptive Restart), a test-time control framework that trains a diagnostic policy to predict two signals from partial trajectories: a trap index for where to truncate and an escape probability for whether and how strongly to intervene. At inference time, TAAR truncates the trajectory before the predicted trap segment and adaptively restarts decoding; for severely trapped cases, it applies stronger perturbations, including higher-temperature resampling and an optional structured reboot suffix. Experiments on challenging mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks (AIME24, AIME25, GPQA-Diamond, HMMT25, BRUMO25) show that TAAR improves reasoning performance without fine-tuning base model parameters.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves multi-step mathematical problem solving in large language models but remains vulnerable to exposure bias and error accumulation, as early mistakes propagate irreversibly through autoregressive decoding. In this work, we propose DiffCoT, a diffusion-styled CoT framework that reformulates CoT reasoning as an iterative denoising process. DiffCoT integrates diffusion principles at the reasoning-step level via a sliding-window mechanism, enabling unified generation and retrospective correction of intermediate steps while preserving token-level autoregression. To maintain causal consistency, we further introduce a causal diffusion noise schedule that respects the temporal structure of reasoning chains. Extensive experiments on three multi-step CoT reasoning benchmarks across diverse model backbones demonstrate that DiffCoT consistently outperforms existing CoT preference optimization methods, yielding improved robustness and error-correction capability in CoT reasoning.

Abstract:
Constructing Knowledge Graphs (KGs) from unstructured text provides a structured framework for knowledge representation and reasoning, yet current LLM-based approaches struggle with a fundamental trade-off: factual coverage often leads to relational fragmentation, while premature consolidation causes information loss. To address this, we propose SocraticKG, an automated KG construction method that introduces question-answer pairs as a structured intermediate representation to systematically unfold document-level semantics prior to triple extraction. By employing 5W1H-guided QA expansion, SocraticKG captures contextual dependencies and implicit relational links typically lost in direct KG extraction pipelines, providing explicit grounding in the source document that helps mitigate implicit reasoning errors. Evaluation on the MINE benchmark demonstrates that our approach effectively addresses the coverage-connectivity trade-off, achieving superior factual retention while maintaining high structural cohesion even as extracted knowledge volume substantially expands. These results highlight that QA-mediated semantic scaffolding plays a critical role in structuring semantics prior to KG extraction, enabling more coherent and reliable graph construction in subsequent stages.

Abstract:
Automated Program Repair (APR) is vital for software maintenance. Despite notable advancements, existing methods still face challenges of insufficient bug dependency modeling and inadequate global repair planning when addressing semantically complex multi-location bugs. We propose CascadeFix, a multi-location automatic repair method via cascading planning and generation. Firstly, to improve the modeling of semantic and structural dependencies among bugs, three types of bug relationships-Use, Copy, and Nearby-are defined to characterize semantic connection, patch reusability, and contextual interference. Then, to address inadequate global repair planning, a cascading repair planning algorithm is designed to effectively cluster strongly correlated bugs and intelligently assign reasonable repair priorities and operations to each cluster, ensuring the rationality and consistency of global repair. Finally, taking clusters as the basic repair units, a cascading patch generation mechanism is proposed to dynamically integrate intra-cluster dependency information and cross-cluster repair knowledge, producing patches that maintain syntactic correctness and semantic consistency under global dependency constraints. Experiments on Defects4J show that CascadeFix resolves 84 multi-location bugs, achieving a 31% improvement over current state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Evaluating software engineering capabilities has become a core component of modern large language models (LLMs); however, the key bottleneck hindering further scaling lies not in the scarcity of high-quality solutions, but in the lack of high-quality test suites. Test suites are indispensable both for synthesizing program repair trajectories and for providing precise feedback signals in reinforcement learning. Unfortunately, due to the high cost and difficulty of annotation, high-quality test suites have long been hard to obtain, while those automatically generated by LLMs tend to be superficial and lack sufficient discriminative power. As a first step toward constructing high-quality test suites, we introduce SWE-Mutation, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-generated test suites. The benchmark characterizes test suites by introducing systematically mutated solutions that attempt to “fool” the test suites and pass validation. We further propose an agentic, language-agnostic framework for automatically generating complex mutants. Our benchmark consists of 2,636 mutated variants derived from 800 original instances and includes a multilingual subset spanning nine programming languages. Experiments on seven LLMs reveal that even DeepSeek-V3.1 achieves only 10.20% verification and 36.15% detection rates, highlighting the inadequacy of current LLMs. Additionally, our agentic mutation strategy enhances realism, reducing average detection rates from 71.04% to 39.81% compared to conventional methods. These findings expose persistent deficiencies in the ability of current LLMs to generate reliable and discriminative test suites.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs), particularly for complex reasoning tasks, yet it often suffers from exploration collapse: policies prematurely concentrate on a small set of dominant reasoning patterns, improving pass@1 while limiting rollout-level diversity and gains in pass@k. We argue that this failure stems from regularizing local token behavior rather than diversity over sets of solutions. To address this, we propose Uniqueness-Aware Reinforcement Learning, a rollout-level objective that explicitly rewards correct solutions that exhibit rare high-level strategies. Our method uses an LLM-based judge to cluster rollouts for the same problem according to their high-level solution strategies, ignoring superficial variations, and reweights policy advantages inversely with cluster size. As a result, correct but novel strategies receive higher rewards than redundant ones. Across mathematics, physics, and medical reasoning benchmarks, our approach consistently improves pass@k across large sampling budgets and increases the area under the pass@k curve (AUC@K) without sacrificing pass@1, while sustaining exploration and uncovering more diverse solution strategies at scale. Code is in Software part under submission page.

Abstract:
Aligning Vision-Language Models (VLMs) with safety standards is essential to mitigate risks arising from their multimodal complexity, where integrating vision and language unveils subtle threats beyond the reach of conventional safeguards. Inspired by the insight that reasoning across modalities is key to preempting intricate vulnerabilities, we propose a novel direction for VLM safety: multimodal reasoning-driven prompt rewriting. To this end, we introduce VLMGuard-R1, a proactive framework that refines user inputs through a reasoning-guided rewriter, dynamically interpreting text-image interactions to deliver refined prompts that bolster safety across diverse VLM architectures without altering their core parameters. To achieve this, we devise a three-stage reasoning pipeline to synthesize a dataset that trains the rewriter to infer subtle threats, enabling tailored, actionable responses over generic refusals. Extensive experiments across five benchmarks with six VLMs reveal that VLMGuard-R1 outperforms four baselines. In particular, VLMGuard-R1 achieves a remarkable 43.59% increase in average safety across five models on the SIUO benchmark.

Abstract:
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are among the most clinically mature platforms for nucleic acid delivery, yet designing lipids that are both effective and biologically safe remains a major bottleneck. In practical screening, toxicity is a decision-level constraint: if a lipid is toxic, its efficiency prediction is clinically irrelevant. We propose LipoAgent , a safety-aware multi-agent LLM framework for lipid discovery. LipoAgent combines domain-specific fine-tuning with a conditional prediction objective that enforces toxicity as a prerequisite for efficiency prediction, and further improves reliability via multi-agent verification with lightweight human oversight when disagreement persists. Across multiple foundation models, LipoAgent achieves an average 32% relative improvement in mRNA transfection efficiency prediction compared with other reported models for lipid design. Wet-lab validation confirms that virtual screening rankings reliably translate to biological transfection outcomes. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/SAI-Lab-NYU/LipoAgent.git.

Abstract:
We present a Bengali mathematical reasoning model called GanitLLM (named after the Bangla word for mathematics, "Ganit"), together with a new difficulty-aware Bengali math corpus and a curriculum-based GRPO pipeline. Bengali is one of the world’s most widely spoken languages, yet existing LLMs either reason in English and then translate, or simply fail on multi-step Bengali math, in part because reinforcement learning recipes are tuned for high-resource languages and collapse under reward sparsity in low-resource settings. To address this, we construct Ganit, a rigorously filtered and decontaminated Bengali math dataset with automatic difficulty tags derived from the pass@k of a strong evaluator model. Building on this dataset, we propose Curriculum-GRPO, which combines multi-stage training (SFT + GRPO) with difficulty-aware sampling and verifiable rewards for format, numerical correctness, and Bengali reasoning. On Bn-MGSM and Bn-MSVAMP, GanitLLM-4B improves over its Qwen3-4B base by +8 and +7 accuracy points, respectively, while increasing the percentage of Bengali reasoning tokens from 14% to over 88% and reducing average solution length from 943 to 193 words.

Abstract:
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), which models relationships between fine-grained semantic units as a graph, effectively facilitates multi-hop reasoning to enhance large language model generation. However, its design focuses on local relationships, resulting in suboptimal performance for tasks that require global context, and the separation of query refinement from indexing limits the system’s ability to capture high-level implicit relationships within the graph. This paper proposes a Panorama-guided RAG paradigm (PanoramaRAG) that integrates a light yet comprehensive “panorama” of the corpus to guide all stages of the retrieval process. This hub bridges the knowledge graph, language models, and queries in a computationally efficient manner, applicable to both open-source and closed-source models. Experimental results demonstrate that our method exhibits strong performance across five datasets and a variety of tasks.

Abstract:
Recent work, such as TripCraft and TravelPlanner, has shown the promise of Large Language Models (LLMs) for personalized, constraint-aware travel itinerary generation. However, real-world travel often involves disruptions such as transit cancellations, weather-related closures, or overbooked attractions. To address this gap, we introduce TripTide, the first benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LLMs to revise travel itineraries under realistic disruptions.TripTide models both disruption severity and traveler tolerance, enabling systematic evaluation of how LLMs respond to unexpected travel events. The benchmark simulates scenarios where existing itineraries must be revised while preserving the traveler’s original intent and respecting practical constraints. We conduct a three-fold evaluation of itinerary revision quality: (i) Automatic metrics measuring Preservation of Intent, Responsiveness, and Adaptability (semantic, spatial, and sequential), (ii) LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation assessing the quality and plausibility of revised itineraries and (iii) Human evaluation examining overall revision quality and user satisfaction.Our findings show that LLMs generally preserve semantic intent and sequential structure, while spatial deviations are more pronounced in shorter itineraries and diminish for longer ones. However, the ability to handle disruptions degrades as itinerary length increases, highlighting limitations in long-horizon itinerary revision. The TripTide benchmark provides a foundation for systematically evaluating robustness and adaptability in LLM-based travel planning systems.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is the prevailing paradigm for grounding Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the mechanisms governing how models integrate groups of conflicting retrieved evidence remain opaque. Does an LLM answer a certain way because the evidence is factually strong, because of a prior belief, or merely because it is repeated frequently? To answer this, we introduce GroupQA , a curated dataset of 1,635 controversial questions paired with 15,058 diversely-sourced evidence documents, annotated for stance and qualitative strength. Through controlled experiments, we characterize group-level evidence aggregation dynamics: Paraphrasing an argument can be more persuasive than providing distinct independent support; Models favor evidence presented first rather than last, and Larger models are increasingly resistant to adapt to presented evidence. Additionally, we find that LLM explanations to group-based answers are unfaithful. Together, we show that LLMs behave consistently as vulnerable heuristic followers, with direct implications for improving RAG system design.

Abstract:
We introduce ChemBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ capabilities in analytical chemistry scenarios. Unlike existing benchmarks focused on factual knowledge, ChemBench assesses model abilities to provide contextualized, practical guidance for complex analytical chemistry challenges, including instrument readiness checks, system suitability testing, method development, and troubleshooting for both liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) platforms. We evaluate three enhancement approaches: chemistry-specialized models, human-guided Chain-of-Thought reasoning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Our findings reveal that general-purpose commercial models often outperform domain-specialized ones, while RAG and reasoning significantly improve performance. The six-dimension evaluation framework (specificity, correctness, usefulness, feasibility, misinformation risk, and error handling) provides valuable insights into LLMs’ real-world utility for chemistry researchers, establishing a foundation for developing more effective AI assistants for scientific research.

Abstract:
Multimodal LLMs can accurately perceive numerical content across modalities yet fail to perform exact multi-digit multiplication when the identical underlying arithmetic problem is presented as numerals, number words, images, or in audio form. Because existing benchmarks often lack systematically paired instances across modalities, it remains difficult to compare genuine arithmetic limits within and across model families. We therefore introduce a controlled multimodal multiplication benchmark that factorially varies digit length, digit sparsity, representation (e.g., numerals vs. number words), and modality (text, rendered images, and audio), with paired instances from a reproducible generator. We also define arithmetic load, C , as the product of the total and non-zero digit number as a compact, mechanistically motivated proxy for operation count. Across evaluations, accuracy falls sharply as C grows, often nearing zero by C > 100 . Indeed, C remains predictive of performance across modalities and models, with R 2 > 0.5 , nearing the value from more complex measures of arithmetic load that count the number of intermediate arithmetic steps. A separate perception-versus-computation decomposition shows that multimodal degradation is primarily computational rather than perceptual: on matched perception checks, models are near-perfect ( >99% ) across modalities even when multiplication accuracy drops substantially. Beyond measuring when models fail, we ask which procedures they are predisposed to follow. We introduce a style-controlled forced-completion loss probe that scores heuristic-specific reasoning prefixes—including columnar multiplication, distributive decomposition, and rounding/compensation. Here, distributive decomposition is favored in both text and vision modalities; heuristic-specific LoRA adapters produce near-orthogonal updates yet degrade accuracy, indicating the base model maintains a well-tuned internal router.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs), despite strong performance on complex mathematical problems, exhibit systematic limitations in counting tasks. This issue arises from the architectural limits of transformers, where counting is performed across layers, leading to degraded precision for larger counting problems due to depth constraints. To address this limitation, we propose a simple test-time strategy inspired by System-2 cognitive processes that decomposes large counting tasks into smaller, independent sub-problems that the model can reliably solve. We evaluate this approach using observational and causal mediation analyses to understand the underlying mechanism of this System-2-like strategy. Our mechanistic analysis identifies key components: latent counts are computed and stored in the final item representations of each part, transferred to intermediate steps via dedicated attention heads, and aggregated in the final stage to produce the total count. Experimental results demonstrate that this strategy enables LLMs to surpass architectural limitations and achieve higher accuracy on large-scale counting tasks. This work provides mechanistic insight into System-2 counting in LLMs and presents a generalizable approach for improving and understanding their reasoning behavior.

Abstract:
While word embeddings derive meaning from co-occurrence patterns, human language understanding is grounded in sensory and motor experience. We present SENSE ( S ensorimotor E mbedding N orm S coring E ngine), a learned projection model that predicts Lancaster sensorimotor norms from word lexical embeddings. We also conducted a behavioral study where 281 participants selected which among candidate nonce words evoked specific sensorimotor associations, finding statistically significant correlations between human selection rates and SENSE ratings across 6 of the 11 modalities. Sublexical analysis of these nonce word selection rates revealed systematic phonesthemic patterns for the interoceptive norm, suggesting a path towards computationally proposing candidate phonesthemes from text data.

Abstract:
Since software performance requirements are documented in natural language, quantifying them into mathematical forms is essential for software engineering. Yet, the vagueness in performance requirements and uncertainty of human cognition have caused highly uncertain ambiguity in the interpretations, rendering their automated quantification an unaddressed and challenging problem. In this paper, we formalize the problem and propose IRAP, an approach that quantifies performance requirements into mathematical functions via interactive retrieval-augmented preference elicitation. IRAP differs from the others in that it explicitly derives from problem-specific knowledge to retrieve and reason the preferences, which also guides the progressive interaction with stakeholders, while reducing the cognitive overhead. Experiment results against 10 state-of-the-art methods on four real-world datasets demonstrate the superiority of IRAP on all cases with up to 40x improvements under as few as five rounds of interactions.

Abstract:
Hallucinations—generating responses inconsistent with the visual input—remain a critical limitation of large vision-language models (LVLMs), especially in open-ended tasks such as image captioning and visual reasoning. In this work, we probe the layer-wise generation dynamics that drive hallucinations and propose a training-free mitigation strategy. Employing the Logit Lens, we examine how LVLMs construct next-token distributions across decoder layers, uncovering a pronounced commitment-depth gap: truthful tokens accumulate probability mass on their final candidates earlier than hallucinatory ones. Drawing on this discovery, we introduce Context Embedding injection (CEI), a lightweight method that harnesses the hidden state of the last input token—the context embedding—as a grounding signal to maintain visual fidelity throughout decoding and curb hallucinations. Evaluated on the CHAIR, AMBER, and MMHal-Bench benchmarks (with a maximum token length of 512), CEI outperforms state-of-the-art baselines across three LVLMs, with its dynamic variant yielding the lowest overall hallucination rates. By integrating novel mechanistic insights with a scalable intervention, this work advances the mitigation of hallucinations in LVLMs. Data and code are available at https://github.com/mehrdadfazli/CEI.

Abstract:
Zero-shot Named Entity Recognition (ZS-NER) remains brittle under domain and schema shifts, where unseen label definitions often misalign with a large language model’s (LLM’s) intrinsic semantic organization. As a result, directly mapping entity mentions to fine-grained target labels can induce systematic semantic drift, especially when target schemas are novel or semantically overlapping. We propose SAM-NER , a three-stage framework based on Semantic Archetype Mediation that stabilizes cross-domain transfer through an intermediate, domain-invariant archetype space. SAM-NER: (i) performs Entity Discovery via cooperative extraction and consensus-based denoising to obtain high-coverage, high-fidelity entity spans; (ii) conducts Abstract Mediation by projecting entities into a compact set of universal semantic archetypes distilled from high-level ontological abstractions; and (iii) applies Semantic Calibration to resolve archetype-level predictions into target-domain types through constrained, definition-aligned inference with a frozen LLM. Experiments on the CrossNER benchmark show that SAM-NER consistently outperforms strong prior ZS-NER baselines in cross-domain settings.

Abstract:
Sentiment classification is a crucial task in natural language processing (NLP). To mitigate the spurious correlation, the causal word identification method estimates the impact of treatment words on sentence sentiment and removes those with low treatment effects. However, previous works regard the presence or absence of a specific word in a sentence as a binary treatment. This approach limits the generalizability to novel words and the robustness of low-frequency words. To bridge this gap, we propose a meta-causal approach that achieves causal word identification for arbitrary words with a single training task. Specifically, we begin by clustering contexts based on their embeddings obtained from a pre-trained language model. Subsequently, for each cluster, a representation and multi-head prediction networks are trained to estimate the treatment effect of each word to distinguish causally related words from spuriously correlated ones. The trained word classifier is then used to give weights for different words to train a more robust and generalizable sentiment classification model. Extensive experiments on public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in identifying causal words and improving the performance of sentiment classification.

Abstract:
Large Language Model(LLM)-based agents have shown strong capabilities in web information seeking, with reinforcement learning (RL) becoming a key optimization paradigm. However, planning remains a bottleneck, as existing methods struggle with long-horizon strategies. Our analysis reveals a critical phenomenon—plan anchor—where the first reasoning step disproportionately impacts downstream behavior in long-horizon web reasoning tasks. Current RL algorithms, fail to account for this by uniformly distributing rewards across the trajectory.To address this, we propose Anchor-GRPO, a two-stage RL framework that decouples planning and execution. In Stage 1, the agent optimizes its first-step planning using fine-grained rubrics derived from self-play experiences and human calibration. In Stage 2, execution is aligned with the initial plan through sparse rewards, ensuring stable and efficient tool usage. We evaluate Anchor-GRPO on four benchmarks: BrowseComp, BrowseComp-Zh, GAIA, and XBench-DeepSearch. Across models from 3B to 30B, Anchor-GRPO outperforms baseline GRPO and First-step GRPO, improving task success and tool efficiency. Notably, WebAnchor-30B achieves 46.0% pass@1 on BrowseComp and 76.4% on GAIA. Anchor-GRPO also demonstrates strong scalability, getting higher accuracy as model size and context length increase.

Abstract:
The reliability of multilingual Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation is currently compromised by the inconsistent quality of translated benchmarks. Existing resources often suffer from semantic drift and context loss, which can lead to misleading performance metrics. In this work, we present a fully automated framework designed to address these challenges by enabling scalable, high-quality translation of datasets and benchmarks. We demonstrate that adapting test-time compute scaling strategies, specifically Universal Self-Improvement (USI) and our proposed multi-round ranking method, T-RANK, allows for significantly higher quality outputs compared to traditional pipelines. Our framework ensures that benchmarks preserve their original task structure and linguistic nuances during localization. We apply this approach to translate popular benchmarks and datasets into eight Eastern and Southern European languages (Ukrainian, Bulgarian, Slovak, Romanian, Lithuanian, Estonian, Turkish, Greek). Evaluations using both reference-based metrics and LLM-as-a-judge show that our translations surpass existing resources, resulting in more accurate downstream model assessment. We release both the framework and the improved benchmarks to facilitate robust and reproducible multilingual AI development.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have catalyzed the rise of reasoningintensive inference paradigms, where models perform explicit step-by-step reasoning before generating final answers. While such approaches improve answer quality and interpretability, they incur substantial computational overhead due to the prolonged generation sequences. In this paper, we propose Tandem, a novel collaborative framework that synergizes large and small language models (LLMs and SLMs) to achieve high-quality reasoning with significantly reduced computational cost. Specifically, the LLM serves as a strategic coordinator, efficiently generating a compact set of critical reasoning insights. These insights are then used to guide a smaller, more efficient SLM in executing the full reasoning process and delivering the final response. To balance efficiency and reliability, Tandem introduces a cost-aware termination mechanism that adaptively determines when sufficient reasoning guidance has been accumulated, enabling early stopping of the LLM’s generation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation benchmarks demonstrate that Tandem reduces computational costs by approximately 40% compared to standalone LLM reasoning, while achieving superior or competitive performance. Furthermore, the sufficiency classifier trained on one domain transfers effectively to others without retraining. The code is available at: https://github.com/Applied-MachineLearning-Lab/ACL2026_Tandem.

Abstract:
Reasoning is a core capability of large language models (LLMs), yet how multi-step reasoning is learned and executed remains unclear. We study this question in a controlled cellular-automata (1dCA) framework that excludes memorization by using disjoint training and test rules. Given a short state sequence, the model is required to infer the hidden local rule and then chain it to predict multiple future steps. Our evaluation shows that LLMs largely fail to reliably solve a natural-language proxy of the proposed task. We find that most neural architectures trained from scratch can learn rule inference and achieve high next-step accuracy, but performance drops sharply as the required number of intermediate reasoning steps increases. Experiments show that increasing model depth is crucial, and extending effective depth via recurrence, memory, or test-time compute improves results but remains bounded. Code is available on github: https://github.com/RodkinIvan/associative-recurrent-memory-transformer/tree/ACT.

Abstract:
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) can answer questions in many languages, but how they internally reason across languages remains poorly understood. In this work, we study multilingual reasoning through a decision-making perspective to investigate how multilingual reasoning unfolds in multilingual LLMs using aligned multiple-choice questions from the mMMLU benchmark. By formulating a controlled setup, presenting the same question in different languages, and tracking the model’s decision from the first token to the final answer choice, we can directly compare how reasoning trajectories evolve across languages. We first demonstrate that, at the representation level, different languages share highly similar activation spaces; however, subtle divergences emerge as decisions propagate through the transformer layers. We then model answer selection as a stepwise trajectory, revealing where language-specific signals arise. These patterns are further confirmed by quantifying deviations along these trajectories, highlighting layers where multilingual processing deviates or converges. Our work provides a controlled, layer-resolved view of multilingual reasoning, shedding light on how LLMs balance shared conceptual understanding with language-specific decision-making.

Abstract:
We present a discrete diffusion-based generative model for text generation using Glauber dynamics from statistical physics. Our main insight is that instead of trying to train a discrete state space diffusion model using Glauber dynamics with a uniform transition kernel as the forward process, one can set up an “energy function” based on pretrained causal/masked language models, which, when viewed as the stationary distribution, allows us to significantly improve the quality of the generated text. Using UL2 as our pretrained models and modifying and incorporating it into our diffusion pipeline, we obtain significantly better perplexities than prior diffusion-based text generative models and are competitive with the perplexities of GPT-2-medium and GPT-2-large for comparable model sizes. Furthermore, our models outperform prior diffusion models and GPT-2 style auto-regressive models on some zero-shot common sense reasoning tasks as well as some planning/search tasks.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) Agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in task automation and intelligent decision-making, driving the widespread adoption of agent development frameworks such as LangChain and AutoGen. However, these frameworks predominantly serve developers with extensive technical expertise—a significant limitation considering that only 0.03% of the global population possesses the necessary programming skills. This stark accessibility gap raises a fundamental question: Can we enable everyone, regardless of technical background, to build their own LLM agents using natural language alone? To address this challenge, we introduce AutoAgent - a Fully-Automated and highly Self-Developing framework that enables users to create and deploy LLM agents through Natural Language Alone. Operating as an autonomous Agent Operating System, AutoAgent comprises four key components: i) Agentic System Utilities, ii) LLM-powered Actionable Engine, iii) Self-Managing File System, and iv) Self-Play Agent Customization module. This lightweight yet powerful system enables efficient and dynamic creation and modification of tools, agents, and workflows without coding requirements or manual intervention. Beyond its code-free agent development capabilities, AutoAgent also serves as a versatile multi-agent system for General AI Assistants. Comprehensive evaluations on the GAIA benchmark demonstrate AutoAgent’s effectiveness in generalist multi-agent tasks, surpassing existing state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, AutoAgent’s Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-related capabilities have shown consistently superior performance compared to many alternative LLM-based solutions.

Abstract:
Contrastive vision-language models (VLMs) have made significant progress in binding visual and textual information, yet understanding long, compositional captions remains an open challenge. While these capabilities are often assumed to be closely related, the conditions under which they reinforce each other remain unclear. In this paper, we empirically analyze when compositional reasoning and long-caption understanding transfer across tasks, and when this relationship fails. Through controlled experiments across diverse training objectives, datasets, and architectural designs, we find a bidirectional but sensitive relationship between the two capabilities. Models trained on poorly grounded captions or with limited parameter updates fail to generalize, while high-quality long-caption data with strong visual grounding promotes both capabilities simultaneously. We further show that architectural choices aimed at preserving general alignment, such as frozen positional embeddings, can inadvertently limit compositional learning. Our analysis provides actionable guidelines for data selection and model design to improve VLM generalization.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid progress of large vision-language models (LVLMs), fine-grained, state-conditioned GUI interaction remains challenging. Current evaluations offer limited coverage, imprecise target-state definitions, and an overreliance on final-task success, obscuring where and why agents fail.To address this gap, we introduce FineState-Bench , a benchmark that evaluates whether an agent can correctly ground an instruction to the intended UI control and reach the exact target state.FineState-Bench comprises 2,209 instances across desktop, web, and mobile platforms, spanning four interaction families and 23 UI component types, with each instance explicitly specifying an exact target state for fine-grained state setting.We further propose FineState-Metrics , a four-stage diagnostic pipeline with stage-wise success rates: Localization Success Rate (SR@Loc), Interaction Success Rate (SR@Int), Exact State Success Rate at Locate (ES-SR@Loc), and Exact State Success Rate at Interact (ES-SR@Int), and a plug-and-play Visual Diagnostic Assistant (VDA) that generates a Description and a bounding-box Localization Hint to diagnose visual grounding reason via controlled w/ vs. w/o comparisons.On FineState-Bench, exact goal-state success remains low: ES-SR@Int peaks at 32.8% on Web and 22.8% on average across platforms. With VDA localization hints, Gemini-2.5-Flash gains +14.9 ES-SR@Int points, suggesting substantial headroom from improved visual grounding, yet overall accuracy is still insufficient for reliable fine-grained state-conditioned interaction Github.

Abstract:
Knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) serves as an essential benchmark for KG-enhanced large language models. Among various approaches, agent-based methods have emerged as an effective solution.Existing methods adopt entity-centric exploration that incrementally constructs reasoning paths by selecting and connecting intermediate entities. However, they face two critical limitations. (1) Entity incompleteness vulnerability arises when some intermediate entities lack semantic information beyond opaque IDs, preventing relevance evaluation and leading to discarding valid reasoning paths.(2) Premature entity pruning occurs because beam search retains only top-ranked entities at each step, eliminating candidates before their relevance can be verified.To address these challenges, this paper proposes Chain-of-Relations (CoR) with relation-centric exploration and global entity filtering, reducing dependence on entity completeness and ensuring complete candidate retrieval before constraint validation.Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that CoR consistently outperforms strong baselines in both F1 score and KG-grounded Rate.

Abstract:
Medical report generation from medical images is a vital AI task that helps doctors with diagnosis and marks a significant step toward creating general AI-powered medical systems. However, previous methods either fail to optimize factual accuracy or heavily depend on expert preference data. To overcome these challenges, we propose MedQPA , an automatic and generalizable report evaluation technique that uses question proposing and answering to enable controllable, structured reasoning grounded in medical domain knowledge and the factual correctness of the report. Additionally, we design MedQPA-Gen , a medical report generation pipeline that maximizes the MedQPA score through prompt engineering and reinforcement learning with MedQPA as a reward signal. We demonstrate that MedQPA is an accurate evaluation metric that closely correlates with human preferences. More importantly, MedQPA-Gen achieves higher human preference scores and better performance on downstream tasks. We open-source code at this repo https://github.com/MedQPA-gen/MedQPA-gen.

Abstract:
Modern Text-to-SQL systems generate multiple candidate SQL queries and rank them to judge a final prediction. However, existing methods face two limitations. First, they often score functionally equivalent SQL queries inconsistently despite identical execution results. Second, ranking cannot recover when the correct SQL is absent from the candidate pool. We propose R3 -SQL, a Text-to-SQL framework that addresses both issues through unified reward for ranking and resampling. R3 -SQL first groups candidates by execution result and ranks groups for consistency. To score each group, it combines a pairwise preference across groups with a pointwise utility from the best group rank and size, capturing relative preference, consistency, and candidate quality. To improve candidate recall, R3 -SQL introduces agentic resampling, which judges the generated candidate pool and selectively resamples when the correct SQL is likely absent. R3 -SQL achieves 75.03 execution accuracy on BIRD-dev, a new state of the art among methods using models with disclosed sizes, with consistent gains across five benchmarks.

Abstract:
Historical documents act as invaluable knowledge archives but often suffer from illegibility due to physical deterioration and damage. While existing restoration methods based on masked language modeling effectively utilize local context, they struggle to restore named entities that require external historical knowledge. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel framework for historical document restoration that leverages large language models with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). By combining the implicit knowledge of pre-trained LLMs with explicitly retrieved external context, our model ARI effectively mitigates the challenge of inferring context-dependent proper nouns. Extensive experiments on Korean historical documents demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baselines, achieving substantial gains in restoring both general characters and named entities. Furthermore, comprehensive evaluations including expert assessments confirm that ARI serves as a practical tool for domain experts, promising to accelerate the analysis of historical records.

Abstract:
Generative engines (GEs) are reshaping information access by replacing ranked links with citation-grounded answers, yet current Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) methods optimize each instance in isolation, unable to accumulate or transfer effective strategies across tasks and engines. We reframe GEO as a strategy learning problem and propose MAGEO, a multi-agent framework in which coordinated planning, editing, and fidelity-aware evaluation serve as the execution layer, while validated editing patterns are progressively distilled into reusable, engine-specific optimization skills. To enable controlled assessment, we introduce a Twin Branch Evaluation Protocol for causal attribution of content edits and DSV-CF, a dual-axis metric that unifies semantic visibility with attribution accuracy. We further release MSME-GEO-Bench, a multi-scenario, multi-engine benchmark grounded in real-world queries. Experiments on three mainstream engines show that MAGEO substantially outperforms heuristic baselines in both visibility and citation fidelity, with ablations confirming that engine-specific preference modeling and strategy reuse are central to these gains, suggesting a scalable learning-driven paradigm for trustworthy GEO. Code is available at https://github.com/Wu-beining/MAGEO.

Abstract:
Event annotation is important for identifying, monitoring, and understanding sociological trends. Although expert annotators set the gold standard, they are expensive and inefficient. While state-of-the-art NLP models are an attractive alternative, they are often evaluated on standalone subtasks rather than entire workflows. Thus, we evaluate a holistic workflow that summarizes news with event coreference resolution and argument extraction in three modes: AI-only, AI assistance, and human only. Although AI’s recall is seven times higher than the tf-idf baseline at coreference resolution, it is far from replacing experts. However, experts adopt AI-extracted arguments 60% of the time, reducing extraction time by 25%. Our code and data are in https://github.com/Obertura777/gtd-data.

Abstract:
Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable problem-solving capabilities by autonomously integrating with external tools for collaborative reasoning. However, due to the inherently complex and diverse nature of multimodal information, enabling multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to flexibly and efficiently utilize external tools during reasoning remains an underexplored challenge. In this work, we introduce ToolScope, an agentic framework designed to unify global planning with local multimodal perception, adopting a specialized Perceive tool to mitigates visual context degradation in long-horizon VQA task. ToolScope comprises three primary components: the Global Navigator, the Agentic Executor, and the Response Synthesizer. The Global Navigator functions as a "telescope”, offering high-level strategic guidance. The Agentic Executor operates iteratively to augment MLLM with local perception through the integration of external tools—Search, Code, and Perceive. Finally, the Response Synthesizer consolidates and organizes the reasoning process into a coherent, user-friendly output. We evaluate ToolScope on four VQA benchmarks across diverse domains, including VQA 2.0, ScienceQA, MAT-Search and MathVista. It demonstrates strong generalization capabilities, achieving an average performance improvement of up to +6.69% across all datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/dengmengjie/ToolScope.

Abstract:
Wikipedia is a critical resource for modern NLP, serving as a rich repository of up-to-date and citation-backed information on a wide variety of subjects. The reliability of Wikipedia—its groundedness in its cited sources—is vital to this purpose. This work analyzes both how grounded Wikipedia is and how readily fine-grained grounding evidence can be retrieved. To this end, we introduce PeopleProfiles—a large-scale, multi-level dataset of claim support annotations on biographical Wikipedia articles. We show that: ~22% of claims in Wikipedia lead sections are unsupported by the article body; ~30% of annotated claims in the article body are unsupported by their (publicly accessible) sources; and real-world Wikipedia citation practices often differ from documented standards. Finally, we show that complex evidence retrieval remains a challenge—even for recent reasoning rerankers.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing (NLP), demonstrating remarkable capabilities across a wide spectrum of tasks. However, when applied to instruction-based text editing, LLMs continue to exhibit some limitations. Different from free-form generation, instruction-based editing requires precise, targeted modifications that respect two essential properties: faithfully implementing the specific instruction and local fidelity. Existing approaches often overlook these properties, treating editing as a generic text generation problem. As a result, they either over-edit or fail to apply modifications consistently. To address this gap, we propose HyperEdit, a framework that adaptively processes each editing request to best align with it. To achieve this, HyperEdit generates request-specific dynamic weights that guide the editing process. The computational overhead of producing these weights is minimized through a carefully designed hypernetwork. With this design, HyperEdit achieves a relatively 9% improvement over the state-of-the-art editing model.

Abstract:
This paper introduces a new paradigm for generative error correction (GER) framework in audio-visual speech recognition (AVSR) that reasons over modality-specific evidences directly in the language space. Our framework, DualHyp, empowers a large language model (LLM) to compose independent N -best hypotheses from separate automatic speech recognition (ASR) and visual speech recognition (VSR) models. To maximize the effectiveness of DualHyp, we further introduce RelPrompt, a noise-aware guidance mechanism that provides modality-grounded prompts to the LLM. RelPrompt offers the temporal reliability of each modality stream, guiding the model to dynamically switch its focus between ASR and VSR hypotheses for an accurate correction. Under various corruption scenarios, our framework attains up to 57.7% error rate gain on the LRS2 benchmark over standard ASR baseline, contrary to single-stream GER approaches that achieve only 10% gain. To facilitate research within our DualHyp framework, we release the code and the dataset comprising ASR and VSR hypotheses at https://github.com/sungnyun/dualhyp.

Abstract:
Scientific reasoning is a key aspect of human intelligence, requiring the integration of multimodal inputs, domain expertise, and multi-step inference across various subjects. Existing benchmarks for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often fail to capture the complexity and traceability of reasoning processes necessary for rigorous evaluation. To fill this gap, we introduce SciVQR, a multimodal benchmark covering 54 subfields in mathematics, physics, chemistry, geography, astronomy, and biology. SciVQR includes domain-specific visuals, such as equations, charts, and diagrams, and challenges models to combine visual comprehension with reasoning. The tasks range from basic factual recall to complex, multi-step inferences, with 46% including expert-authored solutions. SciVQR not only evaluates final answers but also examines the reasoning process, providing insights into how models reach their conclusions. Our evaluation of leading MLLMs, including both proprietary and open-source models, reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal reasoning tasks, underscoring the need for improved multi-step reasoning and better integration of interdisciplinary knowledge in advancing MLLMs toward true scientific intelligence. The dataset and evaluation code are publicly available at https://github.com/CASIA-IVA-Lab/SciVQR.

Abstract:
The U.S. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) regularly discusses and sets monetary policy, affecting the borrowing and spending decisions of hundreds of millions of people. In this work, we release Op-Fed, a dataset of 1044 human-annotated sentences and their contexts from FOMC transcripts that captures monetary policy stance—specifically, whether an individual FOMC member expresses support for tightening or loosening policy. We faced two major technical challenges in dataset creation: imbalanced classes—we estimate fewer than 8% of sentences express a non-neutral stance toward monetary policy—and inter-sentence dependence—65% of instances require context beyond the sentence-level to annotate. To address these challenges, we developed a five-stage hierarchical schema to isolate aspects of opinion, monetary policy, and stance toward monetary policy, as well as the level of context needed. Second, we selected instances to annotate using active learning, approximately doubling the number of positive instances across all schema aspects. Using Op-Fed, we found a top-performing, closed-weight LLM achieves 0.80 zero-shot accuracy in opinion classification but only 0.61 zero-shot accuracy classifying stance toward monetary policy—below our human baseline of 0.89. We expect Op-Fed to be useful for future model training, confidence calibration, and as a seed dataset for future annotation efforts.

Abstract:
We perform in-depth evaluations of in-context learning (ICL) on state-of-the-art transformer, state-space, and hybrid large language models over two categories of knowledge-based ICL tasks. Using a combination of behavioral probing and intervention-based methods, we have discovered that, while LLMs of different architectures can behave similarly in task performance, their internals could remain different. We discover that function vectors (FVs) responsible for ICL are primarily located in the self-attention and Mamba layers, and speculate that Mamba2 uses a different mechanism from FVs to perform ICL. FVs are more important for ICL involving parametric knowledge retrieval, but not for contextual knowledge understanding. Our work contributes to a more nuanced understanding across architectures and task types. Methodologically, our approach also highlights the importance of combining both behavioural and mechanistic analyses to investigate LLM capabilities.

Abstract:
The inherent rigidity of fixed-size benchmarks makes them an inefficient tool for model evaluation. Diverse evaluation objectives, including model ranking, model selection and testing throughout development, demand varying levels of statistical power. The mismatch between fixed sample sizes and these diverse needs results in either excessive computational cost or compromised reliability – a critical concern for model evaluation. To overcome these limitations, we call for adoption of sequential testing in our field. We provide an adaptive evaluation framework, that provides a principled way to navigate the trade-off between efficiency and reliability in model evaluation. Our framework combines the established statistical paradigm of sequential testing with stopping criteria tailored to common evaluation needs such as diminishing returns detection, and minimum detectable effect size. We demonstrate its ability to adaptively manage the efficiency-reliability trade-off on the Open VLM Leaderboard, including, for example, a 80% reduction in computational cost compared to fixed-size evaluation (with a 2.5-point CI width allowance) while maintaining statistical significance.

Abstract:
Robust ASR under domain shift is crucial because real-world systems encounter unseen accents and domains with limited labeled data. Although pseudo-labeling offers a practical workaround, it often introduces systematic, accent-specific errors that filtering fails to fix. We ask: How can we correct these recurring biases without target ground truth? We propose a simple parameter-space correction: in a source domain containing both real and pseudo-labeled data, two ASR models are fine-tuned from the same initialization, one on ground-truth labels and the other on pseudo-labels, and their weight difference forms a correction vector that captures pseudo-label biases.When applied to a pseudo-labeled target model, this vector enhances recognition, achieving up to a 35% relative Word Error Rate (WER) reduction on AfriSpeech-200 across ten African accents with the Whisper tiny model.

Abstract:
LLM-powered systems require complex multi-step decision-making abilities to solve real-world tasks, yet current planning approaches face a trade-off between the high latency of inference-time search and the limited generalization of supervised fine-tuning. To address this limitation, we introduce SGA-MCTS, a framework that casts LLM planning as non-parametric retrieval. Offline, we leverage Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explore the solution space and distill high-fidelity trajectories into State-Goal-Action (SGA) atoms. These atoms are de-lexicalized primitives that abstract concrete entities into symbolic slots, preserving reusable causal logic while discarding domain-specific noise. Online, a retrieval-augmented agent employs a hybrid symbolic-semantic mechanism to fetch relevant SGAs and re-ground them into the current context as soft reasoning hints. Empirical results on complex benchmarks demonstrate that this paradigm enables frozen, open-weights models to match the performance of SOTA systems (e.g., GPT-5) without task-specific fine-tuning. By effectively amortizing the heavy computational cost of search, SGA-MCTS achieves System 2 reasoning depth at System 1 inference speeds, rendering autonomous planning both scalable and real-time feasible.

Abstract:
Prompt injection attacks manipulate large language models (LLMs) by misleading them to deviate from the original input instructions and execute maliciously injected instructions, because of their instruction-following capabilities and inability to distinguish between the original input instructions and maliciously injected instructions. Currently, various prompt injection defense methods have been proposed, including prompt-engineering-based approaches and fine-tuning methods. Most of these methods instruct the model to follow the original input instructions, suppressing its inherent tendencies to follow the injected instructions. However, experimental results reveal that suppressing the model’s instruction-following tendencies is challenging. After analyzing successful attack cases, we find that the LLMs can correctly reference the instructions they are executing in some cases. Motivated by this finding, we propose a defense method that leverages LLMs’ instruction-following abilities rather than suppressing them. Our approach prompts LLMs to generate responses that include both the answers and their corresponding instruction references. Based on these references, we filter out answers whose references are not to the original input instructions. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method. The results show that our approach outperforms prompt-engineering-based baselines and is comparable to fine-tuning methods, reducing the ASR to nearly 0% in some scenarios. Moreover, our approach has minimal impact on overall utility.

Abstract:
High-quality datasets are critical for training and evaluating reliable NLP models. In tasks like natural language inference (NLI), human label variation (HLV) arises when multiple labels are valid for the same instance, making it difficult to separate annotation errors from plausible variation. An earlier framework, VariErr (Weber-Genzel et al., 2024), asks multiple annotators to explain their label decisions in the first round and flags errors through validity judgments in the second round. However, conducting two rounds of manual annotation is costly and may limit the coverage of plausible labels or explanations. Our study proposes a new framework, EVADE, for generating and validating explanations to detect errors using large language models (LLMs). We perform a comprehensive analysis comparing human- and LLM-detected errors for NLI across distribution comparison, validation overlap, and impact on model fine-tuning. Our experiments demonstrate that LLM validation refines generated explanation distributions to more closely align with human annotations, and that removing LLM-detected errors from training data yields improvements in fine-tuning performance than removing errors identified by human annotators. This highlights the potential to scale error detection, reducing human effort while improving dataset quality under label variation.

Abstract:
We introduce TemporalVLM, a video large language model (video LLM) for temporal reasoning and fine-grained understanding in long videos. Our approach includes a visual encoder for mapping a long-term video into features which are time-aware and contain both local and global cues. It first divides an input video into short-term clips, which are jointly encoded with timestamps and fused across overlapping temporal windows into time-sensitive local features. Next, the local features are passed through a bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) module for global feature aggregation. Moreover, to facilitate the evaluation of TemporalVLM, we present a large-scale long video dataset of industry assembly processes, namely IndustryASM, consisting of videos recorded on factory floors with actions and timestamps annotated by industrial engineers for time and motion studies and temporal action segmentation evaluation. Finally, extensive experiments show that TemporalVLM outperforms previous methods across temporal reasoning and fine-grained understanding tasks, i.e., dense video captioning, temporal video grounding, video highlight detection, and temporal action segmentation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) require continual updates to rectify outdated or erroneous knowledge. Model editing has emerged as a compelling paradigm for introducing targeted modifications without the computational burden of full retraining. Existing approaches are mainly based on a locate-then-edit framework. However, in sequential editing contexts, where multiple updates are applied over time, they exhibit significant limitations and suffer from catastrophic interference, i.e., new edits compromise previously integrated updates and degrade preserved knowledge. To address these challenges, we introduce EvoEdit, a novel editing strategy that mitigates catastrophic interference through sequential null-space alignment, enabling stable and efficient model editing. By performing sequential null-space alignment for each incoming edit, EvoEdit preserves both original and previously modified knowledge representations and maintains output invariance on preserved knowledge even across long edit sequences, effectively mitigating interference. Evaluations on real-world sequential knowledge-editing benchmarks show that EvoEdit achieves better or comparable performance than prior state-of-the-art locate-then-edit techniques, with up to 3.53× speedup. Overall, these results underscore the necessity of developing more principled approaches for designing LLMs in dynamically evolving information settings, while providing a simple yet effective solution with strong theoretical guarantees.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed as assistants that interact through text and images, making it crucial to evaluate contextual safety when risk depends on both the visual scene and the evolving dialogue. Existing contextual safety benchmarks are mostly single-turn and often miss how malicious intent can emerge gradually or how the same scene can support both benign and exploitative goals. We introduce the Multi-Turn Multimodal Contextual Safety Benchmark (MTMCS-Bench), a benchmark of realistic images and multi-turn conversations that evaluates contextual safety in MLLMs under two complementary settings, escalation-based risk and context-switch risk. MTMCS-Bench offers paired safe and unsafe dialogues with structured evaluation. It contains over 30 thousand multimodal (image+text) and unimodal (text-only) samples, with metrics that separately measure contextual intent recognition, safety-awareness on unsafe cases, and helpfulness on benign ones. Across eight open-source and seven proprietary MLLMs, we observe persistent trade-offs between contextual safety and utility, with models tending to either miss gradual risks or over-refuse benign dialogues. Finally, we evaluate five current guardrails and find that they mitigate some failures but do not fully resolve multi-turn contextual risks.

Abstract:
Large language model agents increasingly rely on memory to support long-horizon interaction, yet existing frameworks expose only a small set of low-level primitives and lack a formal, executable specification for memory control. As a result, higher-order operations such as promotion, consolidation, or lifecycle governance are missing or inconsistently implemented, leading to unpredictable behavior across systems. We introduce Text2Mem, a unified memory operation language that standardizes the translation of natural-language instructions into reliable execution. Text2Mem defines a compact and expressive operation set spanning encoding, storage, and retrieval, and represents each instruction as a schema-based contract with explicit fields and semantic invariants. Validated schemas are parsed into typed operation objects and executed through a unified pipeline that supports both a SQL reference backend and real memory frameworks, enabling safe, deterministic, and portable behavior across heterogeneous systems. We further outline the Text2Mem Benchmark, which decouples schema generation from backend execution to systematically evaluate planning accuracy and execution fidelity. Together, Text2Mem and its benchmark establish a standardized foundation for controllable and reproducible memory management in LLM-based agents.

Abstract:
Ensuring the safety and compliance of large language models (LLMs) is of paramount importance. However, existing LLM safety datasets often rely on ad-hoc taxonomies for data generation and suffer from a significant shortage of rule-grounded, real-world cases that are essential for robustly protecting LLMs. In this work, we address this critical gap by constructing a comprehensive safety dataset from a compliance perspective. Using a powerful web-searching agent, we collect a rule-grounded, real-world case dataset OmniCompliance-100K, sourced from multi-domain authoritative references. The dataset spans 74 regulations and policies across a wide range of domains, including security and privacy regulations, content safety and user data privacy policies from leading AI companies and social media platforms, financial security requirements, medical device risk management standards, educational integrity guidelines, and protections of fundamental human rights. In total, our dataset contains 12,985 distinct rules and 106,009 associated real-world compliance cases. Our analysis confirms a strong alignment between the rules and their corresponding cases. We further conduct extensive benchmarking experiments to evaluate the safety and compliance capabilities of advanced LLMs across different model scales. Our experiments reveal several interesting findings that have great potential to offer valuable insights for future LLM safety research.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) internalize vast world knowledge as parametric memory, yet inevitably inherit the staleness and errors of their source corpora. Consequently, ensuring the reliability and malleability of these internal representations is imperative for trustworthy real-world deployment. Knowledge editing offers a pivotal paradigm for surgically modifying memory without retraining. However, while recent editors demonstrate high success rates on standard benchmarks, it remains questionable whether current evaluation frameworks that rely on assessing output under specific prompting conditions can reliably authenticate genuine memory modification. In this work, we introduce a rigorous diagnostic framework that subjects models to discriminative self-assessment under diverse contextual pressures, specifically designed to scrutinize the subtle behavioral nuances induced by memory modifications. This probing reveals a pervasive phenomenon of Surface Compliance, where editors achieve high benchmark scores by merely mimicking target outputs without structurally overwriting internal beliefs. Moreover, we find that recursive modifications accumulate representational residues, triggering cognitive instability and permanently diminishing the reversibility of the model’s memory state. These insights underscore the risks of current editing paradigms and highlight the pivotal role of robust memory modification in building trustworthy, long-term sustainable LLM systems.

Abstract:
Much of the alignment tuning literature is organized around optimization objectives, while the construction of alignment data is often treated implicitly. In this survey, we adopt a data centric perspective and reframe alignment tuning as a pipeline design problem. We decompose alignment data construction into three interacting stages, response synthesis, preference evaluation, and preference instantiation, and use this framework to organize existing alignment methods into a unified taxonomy. Through this lens, we identify recurring design trade-offs and failure modes observed across prior alignment methods, and distill a set of high level principles that clarify how pipeline design choices influence the resulting optimization signal. Finally, we outline open challenges for alignment data pipelines, including prompt-level alignment, agentic settings, and alignment under evolving objectives.

Abstract:
Recent work on music question answering (Music-QA) has primarily focused on single-track understanding, where models answer questions about an individual audio clip using its tags, captions, or metadata. However, listeners often describe music in comparative terms, and existing benchmarks do not systematically evaluate reasoning across multiple tracks. Building on the Jamendo-QA dataset, we introduce Jamendo-MT-QA, a dataset and benchmark for multi-track comparative question answering. From Creative Commons-licensed tracks on Jamendo, we construct 36,519 comparative QA items over 12,173 track pairs, with each pair yielding three question types: yes/no, short-answer, and sentence-level questions. We describe an LLM-assisted pipeline for generating and filtering comparative questions, and benchmark representative audio-language models using both automatic metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation.

Abstract:
We present a phoneme-level analysis of automatic speech recognition (ASR) for two low-resourced and phonologically complex East Caucasian languages, Archi and Rutul, based on curated and standardized speech–transcript resources totaling approximately 50 minutes and 1 hour 20 minutes of audio, respectively. Existing recordings and transcriptions are consolidated and processed into a form suitable for ASR training and evaluation. We evaluate several state-of-the-art audio and audio–language models, including wav2vec2, Whisper, and Qwen2-Audio. For wav2vec2, we introduce a language-specific phoneme vocabulary with heuristic output-layer initialization, which yields consistent improvements and achieves performance comparable to or exceeding Whisper in these extremely low-resource settings. Beyond standard word and character error rates, we conduct a detailed phoneme-level error analysis. We find that phoneme recognition accuracy strongly correlates with training frequency, exhibiting a characteristic sigmoid-shaped learning curve. For Archi, this relationship partially breaks for Whisper, pointing to model-specific generalization effects beyond what is predicted by training frequency. Overall, our results indicate that many errors attributed to phonological complexity are better explained by data scarcity. These findings demonstrate the value of phoneme-level evaluation for understanding ASR behavior in low-resource, typologically complex languages.

Abstract:
The problem of surface-level pattern mapping represents a critical yet underexplored failure mode in large language model (LLM) reasoning, and is particularly acute in cross-architecture code migration of high-performance libraries. On low-resource, low-level code, insufficient coverage in pretraining data often leads LLMs to rely on superficial name- or type-based correspondences, rather than principled refactorization and reasoning grounded in core functional semantics and architecture-specific optimization intents. This tendency severely hampers the effectiveness of LLMs in complex migration scenarios.To address these challenges, we propose FSCM, a multi-agent framework for cross-architecture migration. FSCM decouples complex implementation details through functional mining and code refactoring, guiding LLMs to focus on invariant semantic anchors across architectures. By mitigating surface-level pattern traps, FSCM improves both functional correctness and performance when targeting emerging architectures. Extensive experiments on the challenging real-world OpenCV library migration tasks demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, achieving up to 22% higher correctness rates over Copilot and 43.04x speedup on RISC-V platforms. Code and data are available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/code-F8D4.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) encode images and videos into abundant tokens, which contain substantial redundancy and computation cost. While visual token pruning mitigates the issue, most existing methods lack insight into the intrinsic property of the vision encoder itself. In this work, we dive into the vision encoder and prove that the middle layers pay more attention to the main objects of the image qualitatively and quantitatively, while the deep layers to tokens with rich global information. Utilizing this Hierarchical attention pattern, we propose HiPrune, a training-free and model-agnostic token Pruning method. HiPrune identifies three types of visual tokens according to their attention in different phases of the vision encoder, which preserves different levels of information. By coupling with the similarity of text tokens, we propose a prompt-aware variance, HiPrune++, which further improves instruction following performance under a very low token budget. Extensive experiments across four representative VLMs show that HiPrune achieves up to 99.3% of task accuracy with only 1/3 of the tokens, while reducing inference FLOPs by 58.7%. HiPrune++ maintains up to 99.9% accuracy with 2/9 tokens, highlighting robustness under high-resolution.

Abstract:
Learning Bayesian Networks typically requires access to raw tabular data to estimate conditional probabilities. However, in many scientific domains, raw data is unavailable due to privacy concerns or general lack of access, while structured statistical summaries are increasingly accessible through large language models and published literature. We propose and evaluate five distinct strategies to reconstruct local conditional probability tables solely from statistical summaries in order to parameterize Bayesian Networks. Our comprehensive evaluation across mixed-type synthetic networks demonstrates that copula-based methods significantly outperform standard baselines, offering a viable path for knowledge integration from heterogeneous sources – unlocking the wealth of published knowledge for causal modeling while ensuring transparency and verifiability.

Abstract:
This paper presents DataSciBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in data science. Unlike existing benchmarks limited to single task, simple evaluation metrics, and readily available ground truth (GT), DataSciBench is built on curated, natural, and challenging prompts with complex evaluation criteria and uncertain GT. To bridge the gap, we develop a semi-automated GT generation pipeline, integrating LLM-based self-consistency and human verification to ensure accuracy, predefined task types, and aggregate functions (metrics). Furthermore, we introduce an innovative Intention-Function-Code (IFC) framework, assessing code execution outcomes through metrics and programmatic rules. Evaluating 26 models (8 API-based, 8 open-source general, 9 code generation, and 1 agentic models), our approach offers rigorous insights into LLM strengths and weaknesses. Experimental results show API-based models outperform open-source counterparts across all metrics, with DeepAnalyze-8B leading among open-sourced models. We release all code and data at https://github.com/THUDM/DataSciBench.

Abstract:
Diffusion-based Large Language Models (dLLMs) are emerging as a powerful alternative to traditional autoregressive models. These models learn to generate text by iteratively denoising masked sequences. In this work, we identify a critical problem in dLLMs: the model’s attention is wastefully expended on uninformative mask tokens, diluting its focus on meaningful context. We term this phenomenon “attention dilution”. We further show that this artifact is amplified by token-level noising, whereas models employing sequence-level noise exhibit a reduced effect. To resolve this problem, we introduce Truncated Block Generation, a novel sampling algorithm that not only mitigates attention dilution but also enables faster inference and flexible-length sequence generation. Extensive experiments validate our analysis and demonstrate the marked effectiveness of our proposed method in enhancing both the performance and efficiency of dLLMs.

Abstract:
Lightweight Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are indispensable for resource-constrained applications. The prevailing approach to aligning vision and language models involves freezing both the vision encoder and the language model while training small connector modules. However, this strategy heavily depends on the intrinsic capabilities of the language model, which can be suboptimal for lightweight models with limited representational capacity. In this work, we investigate this alignment bottleneck through the lens of mutual information, positing that the constrained capacity of the language model inherently limits the Effective Mutual Information (EMI) between multimodal inputs and outputs, thereby compromising alignment quality. To address this challenge, we propose TinyAlign, a novel framework inspired by Retrieval-Augmented Generation, which strategically retrieves relevant context from a memory bank constructed from training data to enrich multimodal inputs and enhance their alignment. Extensive empirical evaluations reveal that TinyAlign significantly reduces training loss, accelerates convergence, and enhances task performance with negligible computational overhead. Remarkably, it allows models to achieve baseline-level performance with only 40% of the fine-tuning data, highlighting exceptional data efficiency. Our work thus offers a practical pathway for developing more capable lightweight VLMs while introducing a fresh theoretical lens to better understand and address alignment bottlenecks in constrained multimodal systems.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a puzzling disparity in their formal linguistic competence: while they learn some linguistic phenomena with near-perfect mastery, they often perform below chance on others, even after training on trillions of tokens. In this work, we investigate whether these failures stem from inherent architectural limitations or simply the scarcity of these specific grammatical constructions in web-scale corpora. We pre-train simple GPT-2 Small (124M) models on a 100M-token random sample of the FineWeb corpus and intervene by injecting a minimal amount (1%) of synthetic data targeting specific linguistic phenomena. We find that this targeted intervention substantially improves model performance in 8 out of the 9 worst-performing BLiMP paradigms – notably the accuracy on a specific paradigm, only_npi_scope, surges from 20.9% to 69.4%. Furthermore, we observe that these interventions generally preserve or slightly improve aggregate performance. However, while we also identify a resistant phenomenon, principle_A_c_command, whose performance remains below chance even after our data augmentation, our findings do serve as an optimistic existence proof that even small language models can substantially improve on those linguistic phenomena on which models typically perform poorly, provided the pre-training data contains sufficient exposure to them. This suggests that efforts towards human-scale language modeling may benefit greatly by focusing on data composition. The code to reproduce our results is open-sourced at https://github.com/kowndinya-renduchintala/heterogeneity-in-formal-linguistic-competence.

Abstract:
Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance but still suffer from hallucinations. Model editing has been proposed as a means to correct factual inaccuracies. A challenging scenario is sequential model editing (SME), which aims to rectify errors continuously, rather than a one-time task. During SME, the general capabilities of LLMs can be negatively affected due to the introduction of new parameters. In this paper, we propose a queue-based self-correction framework, QueueEDIT, that not only enhances SME performance by addressing long-sequence dependencies but also mitigates the impact of parameter bias on the general capabilities of LLMs. Specifically, we first introduce a structural mapping editing loss to map editing triplets to knowledge-sensitive neurons within the Transformer layers. We then store the located parameters for each piece of edited knowledge in a queue and dynamically align previously edited parameters. At each edit, we select parameters in the queue that are most relevant to currently located parameters to determine whether knowledge associated with previous edits requires realignment. Irrelevant parameters in the queue are frozen, and we update the parameters at the queue head into the LLM to ensure they do not harm general capabilities. Experiments show that QueueEDIT significantly outperforms strong baselines across various SME settings, while maintaining competitive performance in single-turn editing. Resulting LLMs also preserve high performance on general NLP tasks throughout the SME process.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly used to represent human opinions, values, or beliefs, and their steerability towards these ideals is an active area of research. Existing work focuses predominantly on aligning marginal response distributions, treating each alignment evaluation example independently. While essential, this may overlook deeper latent structures that characterise real populations and underpin cultural values theories. We propose a framework for evaluating the representativeness of aligned models through multivariate correlation patterns in addition to marginal distributions. We show the value of our evaluation scheme by comparing two model steering techniques (persona prompting and demographic fine-tuning) and evaluating them against human responses from the World Values Survey. While the demographic fine-tuned model better approximates marginal response distributions, persona prompting performs marginally better at reproducing the empirical correlation structure between survey items. Despite this reversal, neither technique aligns with human correlation patterns. We conclude that representativeness is a distinct aspect of value alignment and an evaluation focused on marginals can mask structural failures, leading to overly optimistic conclusions about model representativeness.

Abstract:
Text-to-SQL aims to bridge the gap between human intent and relational databases. While LLMs have shown proficiency in generating simple SQL queries, they struggle with complex analytical tasks. Moreover, models fine-tuned on SQL generation often suffer from catastrophic forgetting, which lose the versatility of procedural reasoning and pertaining to generation constraints. Inspired by the usage of high-resource programming languages as LLM reasoning intermediaries, we propose CORES model, which leverages Python as a procedural reasoning pivot to enhance both complex SQL generation and tabular reasoning. It decomposes complex queries into Python reasoning traces before generating the final SQL, which bridges the gap between procedural reasoning and declarative expression. In order to internalize this reasoning capability, we fine-tune LLMs via GRPO with tailored process reward functions that mitigate the sparse feedback problem. We experimentally verify the effectiveness of CORES on six text-to-SQL benchmarks, where ours outperforms baselines by 6.44% on average, while maintains good capability on three tableQA benchmarks.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) using standard first-order (FO) optimization oftendrives training toward sharp, poorly generalizing minima. Conversely, zeroth-order (ZO) methods offer stronger exploratory behaviorwithout relying on explicit gradients, yet suffer from slow convergence. More critically, our analysis reveals that in generative tasks, the vast output and search space significantly amplify estimation variance, rendering ZO methods both noisy and inefficient. To address these challenges, we propose Hi-ZFO (Hierarchical Zeroth- and First-Order optimization), a hybrid framework designed to synergize the precision of FO gradients with the exploratory capability of ZO estimation. Hi-ZFO adaptively partitions the model through layer-wise importance profiling, applying precise FO updates to critical layers while leveraging ZO optimization for less sensitive ones. Notably, ZO in Hi-ZFO is not merely a memory-saving surrogate; it is intentionally introduced as a source of "beneficial stochasticity" to help the model escape the local minima where pure FO optimization tends to stagnate. Validated across diverse generative, mathematical, and code reasoning tasks, Hi-ZFO consistently achieves superior performance while significantly reducing the training time. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of hierarchical hybrid optimization for LLM fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Automated radiology report generation (RRG) holds potential to reduce the workload of radiologists, and recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have enabled multimodal chest X-ray (CXR) report generation. However, existing MLLMs are computationally expensive, require large-scale training data, and may produce hallucinated content, limiting their practical deployment. To address these limitations, we propose RA-RRG, a retrieval-augmented RRG framework that combines multimodal retrieval with large language models (LLMs) to generate radiology reports while reducing hallucinations and computational demands. RA-RRG uses LLMs to extract clinically essential key phrases from radiology reports and retrieves relevant phrases given an input image. By conditioning LLMs on the retrieved phrases, RA-RRG effectively suppresses hallucinations while maintaining strong report generation performance. Experiments on the MIMIC-CXR and IU X-ray datasets show state-of-the-art results on CheXbert metrics and competitive RadGraph F1 scores compared to MLLMs. Furthermore, RA-RRG naturally generalizes to multi-view RRG by aggregating phrases retrieved from multiple images, highlighting its broad applicability to real-world clinical scenarios. Code is available at https://github.com/deepnoid-ai/RA-RRG.

Abstract:
Existing NL2SQL systems face two critical limitations : (1) they rely on in-context learning with only correct examples, overlooking the rich signal in historical error–fix pairs that could guide more robust self-correction; and (2) test-time scaling (TTS) approaches often decompose questions arbitrarily, producing near-identical SQL candidates across runs and diminishing ensemble gains. Moreover, these methods suffer from a stark accuracy–efficiency trade-off: high performance demands excessive computation, while fast variants compromise quality. We present Memo-SQL, a training-free framework that addresses these issues through two simple ideas: structured decomposition and experience-aware self-correction. Instead of leaving decomposition to chance, we apply three clear strategies, entity-wise, hierarchical, and atomic sequential, to encourage diverse reasoning. For correction, we build a dynamic memory of both successful queries and historical error–fix pairs, and use retrieval-augmented prompting to bring relevant examples into context at inference time, no fine-tuning or external APIs required. On BIRD, Memo-SQL achieves 68.5% execution accuracy, setting a new state of the art among open, zero-fine-tuning methods, while using over 10× fewer resources than prior TTS approaches.

Abstract:
Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) built on large language models typically solve complex tasks by coordinating multiple agents through workflows. Existing approaches generates workflows either at task level or query level, but their relative costs and benefits remain unclear. After rethinking and empirical analyses, we show that query-level workflow generation is not always necessary, since a small set of top-K best task-level workflows together already covers equivalent or even more queries. We further find that exhaustive execution-based task-level evaluation is both extremely token-costly and frequently unreliable. Inspired by the idea of self-evolution and generative reward modeling, we propose a low-cost task-level generation framework SCALE , which means S elf prediction of the optimizer with few shot CAL ibration for E valuation instead of full validation execution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SCALE maintains competitive performance, with an average degradation of just 0.61% compared to existing approach across multiple datasets, while cutting overall token usage by up to 83%.

Abstract:
Knowledge Tracing (KT) infers a student’s knowledge state from past interactions to predict future performance. Conventional Deep Learning (DL)-based KT models are typically tied to platform-specific identifiers and latent representations, making them hard to transfer and interpret. Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods can be either ungrounded under prompting or overly domain-dependent under fine-tuning. In addition, most existing KT methods are developed and evaluated under a same-distribution assumption. In real deployments, educational data often arise from heterogeneous platforms with substantial distribution shift, which often degrades generalization. To this end, we propose RAG-KT, a retrieval-augmented paradigm that frames cross-platform KT as reliable context constrained inference with LLMs. It builds a unified multi-source structured context with cross-source alignment via Question Group abstractions and retrieves complementary rich and reliable context for each prediction, enabling grounded prediction and interpretable diagnosis. Experiments on three public KT benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in accuracy and robustness, including strong performance under cross-platform conditions.

Abstract:
3D Vision-Language Models (3D-VLMs) have emerged as the critical cognitive backbone for spatial intelligence, enabling precise reasoning over unstructured 3D data. While these models serve as the foundation for downstream robotics and embodied systems, their reliance on autoregressive decoding introduces a fundamental vulnerability regarding inference efficiency. In this work, we present Inflate3D , a novel adversarial framework designed to trigger computational and economic exhaustion in 3D-VLMs. Specifically, we exploit the model’s sensitivity to untrusted 3D assets to hijack the generation process. Inflate3D operates by injecting imperceptible noise that forces the model into a state of pathological verbosity, effectively stalling the inference pipeline. Our approach comprises two synergistic strategies: (1) a semantic-aware adversarial manipulation that leverages internal representations to selectively perturb semantically critical regions while preserving geometric structure, and (2) a trajectory disruption mechanism that manipulates token probabilities to suppress End-of-Sequence (EOS) emission, thereby prolonging decoding and inducing verbose outputs. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that Inflate3D amplifies output length and energy consumption by up to 6.45× , demonstrating a potent capability to drain system resources. These findings expose a critical blind spot in multimodal alignment, highlighting the urgent need to secure spatial foundation models against resource exhaustion attacks.

Abstract:
Existing memory systems enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to support long-horizon human-LLM interactions by persisting historical interactions beyond limited context windows. However, while recent approaches have succeeded in constructing effective memories, they often disrupt the inherent logical and temporal relationships within interaction sessions, resulting in fragmented memory units and degraded reasoning performance. In this paper, we propose MetaMem, a novel framework that augments memory systems with a self-evolving meta-memory, aiming to teach LLMs how to effectively utilize memorized knowledge. During meta-memory optimization, MetaMem iteratively distills transferable knowledge utilization experiences across different tasks by self-reflecting on reasoning processes and performing actions to update the current meta-memory state. The accumulated meta-memory units serve as explicit knowledge utilization experiences, guiding the LLM to systematically identify and integrate critical evidence from scattered memory fragments. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of MetaMem, which significantly outperforms strong baselines by over 3.6%. All codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/MetaMem.

Abstract:
Current LLM-based frameworks for text anonymization usually rely on remote API services from powerful LLMs, which creates an inherent privacy paradox: users must disclose the raw data to untrusted third parties for guaranteed privacy preservation. Moreover, directly migrating current solutions to local small-scale models (LSMs) offers a suboptimal solution with severe utility collapse. Our work argues that this failure stems not merely from the capability deficits of LSMs, but significantly from the inherent irrationality of the greedy adversarial strategies employed by current state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. To address this, we propose Rational Localized Adversarial Anonymization (RLAA), a fully localized and training-free framework featuring an Attacker-Arbitrator-Anonymizer architecture. We model the anonymization process as a trade-off between Marginal Privacy Gain (MPG) and Marginal Utility Cost (MUC), demonstrating that greedy strategies tend to drift into an irrational state. Instead, RLAA introduces an arbitrator that acts as a rationality gatekeeper, validating the attacker’s inference to filter out ghost leaks. This mechanism promotes a rational early-stopping criterion, and structurally prevents utility collapse. Extensive experiments on different benchmarks demonstrate that RLAA achieves a superior privacy-utility trade-off compared to strong baselines.

Abstract:
Real-time, continuous understanding of visual signals is essential for real-world interactive AI applications, and poses a fundamental system-level challenge. Existing research on streaming video understanding, however, typically focuses on isolated aspects such as question-answering accuracy under limited visual context or improvements in encoding efficiency, while largely overlooking practical deployability under realistic resource constraints. To bridge this gap, we introduce StreamingEval, a unified evaluation framework for assessing the streaming video understanding capabilities of Video-LLMs under realistic constraints. StreamingEval benchmarks both mainstream offline models and recent online video models under a standardized protocol, explicitly characterizing the trade-off between efficiency, storage and accuracy. Specifically, we adopt a fixed-capacity memory bank to normalize accessible historical visual context, and jointly evaluate visual encoding efficiency, text decoding latency, and task performance to quantify overall system deployability. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets reveal substantial gaps between current Video-LLMs and the requirements of realistic streaming applications, providing a systematic basis for future research in this direction. Codes will be released upon acceptance.

Abstract:
In this paper, we show that when spoken language models (SLMs) are instructed to speak in a specific speaking style at the beginning of a multi-turn conversation, they cannot maintain the required speaking styles after several turns of interaction; we refer to this as the style amnesia of SLMs. We focus on paralinguistic speaking styles, including emotion, accent, volume, and speaking speed. We evaluate three proprietary and two open-source SLMs, demonstrating that none of these models can maintain a consistent speaking style when instructed to do so. We further show that while SLMs can recall the style instruction when prompted in later turns, they still fail to express it, but through explicit recall can mitigate style amnesia . In addition, SLMs struggle more when the style instruction is placed in system messages rather than user messages, even though system messages are specifically designed to provide persistent, conversation-level instructions. Our findings highlight a systematic gap in current SLMs’ ability to maintain speaking styles, highlighting the need for improved style adherence in future models. Our code and evaluation data are publicly available at https://github.com/YuXiangLin1234/SLM-Style-Amnesia.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) elicits long chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but outcome-based rewards lead to coarse-grained advantage estimation. While existing approaches improve RLVR via token-level entropy or sequence-level length control, they lack a semantically grounded, step-level measure of reasoning progress. As a result, LLMs fail to distinguish necessary deduction from redundant verification: they may continue checking after reaching a correct solution and, in extreme cases, overturn a correct trajectory into an incorrect final answer. To remedy the lack of process supervision, we introduce a training-free probing mechanism that extracts intermediate confidence and correctness and combines them into a Step Potential signal that explicitly estimates the reasoning state at each step. Building on this signal, we propose Step Potential Advantage Estimation (SPAE), a fine-grained credit assignment method that amplifies potential gains, penalizes potential drops, and applies penalty after potential saturates to encourage timely termination. Experiments across multiple benchmarks show SPAE consistently improves accuracy while substantially reducing response length, outperforming strong RL baselines and recent efficient reasoning and token-level advantage estimation methods. The code is available at https://github.com/cii030/SPAE-RL.

Abstract:
Although negation is known to challenge large language models (LLMs), benchmarks for evaluating negation understanding—especially in Korean—are scarce. We conduct a corpus-based analysis of Korean negation and show that LLM performance degrades under negation. We then introduce Thunder-KoNUBench, a sentence-level negation understanding benchmark that reflects the empirical distribution of Korean negation phenomena. Evaluating 47 LLMs on Thunder-KoNUBench, we analyze the effects of model size and instruction tuning, and perform error analysis to better understand model behavior. We further show that fine-tuning on Thunder-KoNUBench improves negation understanding and broader contextual comprehension in Korean.

Abstract:
The rapid progress of large language models (LLMs) has increased the demand for efficient and reliable evaluation of question answering (QA) systems. Existing evaluation methods either rely on rule-based matching with shallow semantic understanding or adopt LLM-as-a-Judge approaches that incur high cost and latency while offering limited error interpretability. Accordingly, we propose HiEval, a curriculum learning based hierarchical framework for QA task evaluation that supports both quick scoring and fine-grained error analysis. HiEval contains a quick scoring model (HiEval-QS) that predicts three-level correctness labels, and an error analysis model (HiEval-EA) that identifies incorrect responses into five error types. HiEval incorporates a class-balanced focal loss to handle label imbalance, experience replay to prevent forgetting, and contrastive unlikelihood optimization to improve error discrimination. We also construct two large-scale human-annotated evaluation datasets collected from 50 QA-related datasets, covering 8 task types and release two challenging benchmarks. Extensive experiments show that HiEval achieves state-of-the-art performance on both quick scoring and error analysis tasks, outperforming all baseline methods, including GPT-5, while being approximately 25 × faster.

Abstract:
Audio language models (ALMs) are increasingly used for speech-based understanding; yet, their ability to perform semantic reasoning beyond transcription, Text-to-Audio Retrieval, Captioning, and Question-Answering accuracy remains insufficiently benchmarked. In particular, the effects of accent variation, domain shift, and semantic over-inference on audio reasoning are poorly understood. We evaluate audio language models across five semantic and paralinguistic reasoning tasks: entailment, consistency, plausibility, accent drift, and accent restraint. Collectively, these tasks assess a model’s ability to reason over spoken audio as the primary evidence source, including whether a textual hypothesis can be inferred, contradicted, or left undetermined by the audio, whether statements align or conflict with spoken content, whether claims are plausible given the discourse, and whether model predictions remain stable or appropriately constrained across accent variation. These findings highlight critical limitations in current audio reasoning evaluations and hope to provide guidance for more robust and equitable ALM design and assessment.

Abstract:
Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) promise parallel token generation and arbitrary-order decoding, yet it remains unclear to what extent current models truly realize these capabilities. We characterize MDLM behavior along two dimensions—parallelism strength and generation order—using Average Finalization Parallelism (AFP) and Kendall’s τ. We evaluate eight mainstream MDLMs (up to 100B parameters) on 58 benchmarks spanning knowledge, reasoning, and programming. The results show that MDLMs still lag behind comparably sized autoregressive models, mainly because parallel probabilistic modeling weakens inter-token dependencies. Meanwhile, MDLMs exhibit adaptive decoding behavior: their parallelism and generation order vary significantly with the task domain, the stage of reasoning, and whether the output is correct. On tasks that require “backward information” (e.g., Sudoku), MDLMs adopt a solution order that tends to fill easier Sudoku blanks first, highlighting their advantages. Finally, we provide theoretical motivation and design insights supporting a Generate-then-Edit paradigm, which mitigates dependency loss while retaining the efficiency of parallel decoding.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in complex reasoning and tool-based decision making, motivating their application to real-world supply chain management. However, supply chain workflows require reliable long-horizon, multi-step orchestration grounded in domain-specific procedures, which remains challenging for current models. To systematically evaluate LLM performance in this setting, we introduce SupChain-Bench, a unified real-world benchmark that assesses both supply chain domain knowledge and long-horizon tool-based orchestration grounded in standard operating procedures (SOPs). Our experiments reveal substantial gaps in execution reliability across models. We further propose SupChain-ReAct, an SOP-free framework that autonomously synthesizes executable procedures for tool use, achieving the strongest and most consistent tool-calling performance. Our work establishes a principled benchmark for studying reliable long-horizon orchestration in real-world operational settings and highlights significant room for improvement in LLM-based supply chain agents.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models have highlighted their potential to automate computational research, particularly reproducing experimental results. However, existing approaches still use fixed sequential agent pipelines with weak global coordination, which limits their robustness and overall performance. In this work, we propose Hierarchical Research Agent System (HiRAS), a hierarchical multi-agent framework for end-to-end paper reproduction that employs supervisory manager agents to coordinate specialised agents across fine-grained stages. We also identify limitations in the reference-free evaluation of the Paper2Code benchmark and introduce Paper2Code-Extra (P2C-Ex), a refined protocol that incorporates repository-level information and better aligns with the original reference-based metric. We conduct extensive evaluation, validating the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed methods, and observing improvements, including >10% relative performance gain above the previous state-of-the-art using open-source backbone models and significantly reduced hallucination in the evaluation. All code and data will be made publicly available.

Abstract:
Test-time Scaling (TTS) has emerged as a pivotal research direction for enhancing model performance by dynamically allocating computational resources during inference. Recent advancements have adapted this paradigm to Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs), unlocking their potential in multimodal reasoning and generation. Despite rapid progress, the field lacks a systematic survey and unified theoretical framework to delineate the developmental landscape of multimodal TTS. To bridge this gap, we present the first comprehensive review of TTS research for MFMs, proposing a unified taxonomic framework that categorizes existing methodologies into three distinct strategies: sampling-based, feedback-based, and search-based approaches. We further summarize representative applications and benchmarks commonly utilized to evaluate multimodal TTS capabilities in generation and reasoning tasks. Finally, this survey discusses open challenges and outlines future research directions, providing a systematic roadmap for subsequent studies in this rapidly evolving field.

Abstract:
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising candidates for graph tasks. Many studies leverage natural language to describe graphs and apply LLMs for reasoning, yet most focus narrowly on performance benchmarks without fully comparing LLMs to graph learning models or exploring their broader potential. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of LLMs on graph learning tasks, evaluating both off-the-shelf and instruction-tuned models across a variety of scenarios. Beyond accuracy, we discuss data leakage concerns and computational overhead, and assess their performance under few-shot/zero-shot settings, domain transfer, structural understanding, and robustness. Our findings show that LLMs, particularly those with instruction tuning, greatly outperform traditional graph learning models in few-shot settings, exhibit strong domain transferability, and demonstrate excellent generalization and robustness. Our study highlights the broader capabilities of LLMs in graph learning and provides a foundation for future research.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are expected to be trained to act as agents in various real-world environments, but this process relies on rich and varied tool-interaction sandboxes. However, access to real systems is often restricted; LLM-simulated environments are prone to hallucinations and inconsistencies; and manually built sandboxes are hard to scale. In this paper, we propose EnvScaler, an automated framework for scalable tool-interaction environments via programmatic synthesis. EnvScaler comprises two components. First, SkelBuilder constructs diverse environment skeletons through topic mining, logic modeling, and quality evaluation. Then, ScenGenerator generates multiple task scenarios and rule-based trajectory validation functions for each environment. With EnvScaler, we synthesize 191 environments and about 7K scenarios, and apply them to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for Qwen3 series models. Results on three benchmarks show that EnvScaler significantly improves LLMs’ ability to solve tasks in complex environments involving multi-turn, multi-tool interactions.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models asymptotically approach human-level fluency in natural language generation, solely relying on surface-level semantic artifacts for detecting LLM-generated texts has become increasingly precarious. Existing detectors often falter when facing three critical challenges: adversarial perturbations, cross-domain shifts, and the rapid temporal evolution of the foundation model. To address these issues, we propose , a novel framework that reformulates text detection as a signal processing task within the time-frequency domain. Unlike previous methods that analyze static token probability distributions, models the generated output as a probability signal, upon which a differentiable Continuous Wavelet Transform is applied to convert them into learnable spectral representations. This process reveals the intrinsic “spectral fingerprints” in machine-generated texts–patterns that remain invisible in time domain. Comprehensive evaluations on three well-curated datasets (RAID, EvoBench, and Domain-Shift) show that our method achieves a new state-of-the-art. It not only achieves superior accuracy but also exhibits remarkable robustness against sophisticated attacks, generalization across out-of-distribution topics and unseen evolving LLMs. Our results validate the efficacy of spectral analysis as a promising paradigm for LLM-generated texts detection.

Abstract:
While many benchmarks evaluate the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), few isolate reasoning as a capability independent of domain knowledge. We introduce a new benchmark for inductive reasoning inspired by Sound Law Induction (SLI) in historical linguistics and formulated in a simple multi-step Programming by Example (PBE) framework. The task requires inducing a cascade of string rewrite programs that transform inputs into target outputs. We present PBEBench, a fully automated evaluation approach that generates such problems with controllable difficulty and ordering constraints, enabling scalable and contamination-resistant evaluation of sequential inductive reasoning. Using this approach, we construct three datasets that show a large gap between models that leverage test-time compute or long chain-of-thought reasoning and those that do not. Although recent models such as GPT-5 and gpt-oss-120b show promise, solve rates remain below 5% on hard PBEBench instances with long program cascades, even under computationally expensive scaling strategies. Finally, we show that PBEBench scores are more predictive of performance on real SLI than are other inductive reasoning benchmarks. We will release code and data to support further research.

Abstract:
The reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly attributed to training data quality rather than mere parameter scaling. However, existing data-centric paradigms often equate quality with factuality or diversity and ignore the internal logical complexity of training samples. In this work, we propose that natural language harbors Structured Logical Knowledge manifested through entailment relationships and logical topologies. To quantify this, we introduce Structured Logical Knowledge Density (SLKD), a novel metric that measures logical information content by decomposing natural language into executable predicates and logical primitives. Our analysis reveals a significant logical disparity in current datasets where sparse logical signals predominate. Consequently, we propose a density-aware re-cognizing optimization strategy that prioritizes high-density logical samples to align training with the model’s reasoning boundary. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach enhances reasoning performance and generalization without increasing total data volume. These results, further validated within a reinforcement learning framework, suggest that elevating logical density is more critical than expanding data scale for realizing the full cognitive potential of LLMs. The anonymized code is available in the Appendix C.

Abstract:
Full-parameter fine-tuning of large language models is constrained by substantial GPU memory demands. Low-rank adaptation methods mitigate this challenge by updating only a subset of parameters. However, these approaches often limit model expressiveness and yield lower performance than full-parameter fine-tuning. Layer-wise fine-tuning methods have emerged as an alternative, enabling memory-efficient training through static layer importance sampling strategies. However, these methods overlook variations in layer importance across tasks and training stages, resulting in suboptimal performance on downstream tasks. To address these limitations, we propose GRASS, a gradient-based adaptive layer-wise importance sampling framework. GRASS utilizes mean gradient norms as a task-aware and training-stage-aware metric for estimating layer importance. Furthermore, GRASS adaptively adjusts layer sampling probabilities through an adaptive training strategy. We also introduce a layer-wise optimizer state offloading mechanism to further reduce memory usage while maintaining comparable training throughput. Extensive experiments across multiple models and benchmarks demonstrate that GRASS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving an average accuracy improvement of up to 4.38 points and reducing memory usage by up to 19.97%.

Abstract:
We present CadLLM, a training-free method to accelerate the inference throughput of diffusion-based LLMs (dLLMs). We first investigate on the dynamic nature of the token unmasking confidence across blocks and steps. Based on this observation, we then present a lightweight adaptive approach that can control the generation block size, step size, and threshold based on the average confidence score of the unmasked tokens. We further reduce the softmaxing overhead of token probability generation by dynamically leveraging a subset of vocabulary size to regulate sampling breadth. CadLLM is a plug-and-play model-agnostic with KV caching based dLLMs. Extensive experiments on four popular tasks demonstrate the efficacy of CadLLM to yield throughput improvement of up to 1.1-2.28x over the state-of-the-art baseline with competitive accuracy.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly rely on long-form, multi-step reasoning to solve complex tasks such as mathematical problem solving and scientific question answering. Despite strong performance, existing confidence estimation methods typically reduce an entire reasoning process to a single scalar score, ignoring how confidence evolves throughout the generation. As a result, these methods are often sensitive to superficial factors such as response length or verbosity, and struggle to distinguish correct reasoning from confidently stated errors. We propose to characterize the stepwise confidence signal using Signal Temporal Logic (STL). Using a discriminative STL mining procedure, we discover temporal formulas that distinguish confidence signals of correct and incorrect responses. Our analysis found that the STL patterns generalize across tasks, and numeric parameters exhibit sensitivity to individual questions. Based on these insights, we develop a confidence estimation approach that informs STL blocks with parameter hypernetworks. Experiments on multiple reasoning tasks show our confidence scores are more calibrated than the baselines.

Abstract:
Technological progress has led to concrete advancements in tasks that were regarded as challenging, such as automatic fact-checking. Interest in adopting these systems for public health and medicine has grown due to the high-stakes nature of medical decisions and challenges in critically appraising a vast and diverse medical literature. Evidence-based medicine connects to every individual, and yet the nature of it is highly technical, rendering the medical literacy of majority users inadequate to sufficiently navigate the domain. Such problems with medical communication ripen the ground for end-to-end fact-checking agents: check a claim against current medical literature and return with an evidence-backed verdict. And yet, such systems remain largely unused.In this position paper, developed with expert input, we present the first study examining how clinical experts verify real claims from social media by synthesizing medical evidence. In searching for this upper-bound, we reveal fundamental challenges in end-to-end fact-checking when applied to medicine: Difficulties connecting claims in the wild to scientific evidence in the form of clinical trials; ambiguities in underspecified claims mixed with mismatched intentions; and inherently subjective veracity labels. We argue that fact-checking should be approached as an interactive communication problem, rather than an end-to-end process.

Abstract:
Standard Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly designed for static inference with pre-defined inputs, which limits their applicability in dynamic, real-time scenarios. To address this gap, the streaming LLM paradigm has emerged. However, existing definitions of streaming LLMs remain fragmented, conflating streaming generation, streaming inputs, and interactive streaming architectures, while a systematic taxonomy is still lacking. This paper provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of streaming LLMs. First, we establish a unified definition of streaming LLMs based on data flow and dynamic interaction to clarify existing ambiguities. Building on this definition, we propose a systematic taxonomy of current streaming LLMs and provide an in-depth discussion of their underlying methodologies across text, speech, and video streaming scenarios. Furthermore, we explore the applications of streaming LLMs in real-world scenarios and outline promising research directions to support ongoing advances in streaming intelligence. We maintain a continuously updated repository of relevant papers at https://github.com/EIT-NLP/Awesome-Streaming-LLMs.

Abstract:
Self-training has emerged as a promising direction for autonomously improving large language models (LLMs). Existing approaches typically adopt a generate-and-filter paradigm based on rejection sampling, which could suffer from inefficiency and low-quality reasoning paths. Towards this end, this paper proposes a novel framework named ̲Geometric D ̲ata Se ̲lection with Str ̲ategic Prospecting (GALA) for LLM self-training. The core of our GALA is to identify diverse and informative samples from redundant data and exploit them more strategically. In particular, our proposed GALA first conducts clustering on latent sentence embeddings and then selects an anchor sample from each cluster based on the geometric distance to reduce data redundancy. To further exploit these samples, we conduct strategic brainstorming and reflection for high-quality reasoning trajectory prospecting. In addition, we introduce a lightweight dynamic validation module to validate the reliability of mini-batches to ensure the overall quality of the data. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks validate the effectiveness of the proposed GALA against several competing baselines.

Abstract:
We present MTRAG-UN, a benchmark for exploring open challenges in multi-turn retrieval augment generation, a popular use of large language models. We release a benchmark of 666 tasks from 666 conversations containing over 2,800 conversation turns across 6 domains with accompanying corpora. Our experiments show that retrieval and generation models continue to struggle on conversations with UNanswerable, UNderspecified, and NONstandalone questions and UNclear responses. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/IBM/mt-rag-benchmark

Abstract:
Despite the rapid advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a critical question regarding their visual grounding mechanism remains unanswered: do these models genuinely read text embedded in images, or do they merely rely on parametric shortcuts in the text prompt? In this work, we diagnose this issue by introducing the Visualized-Question (VQ) setting, where text queries are rendered directly onto images to structurally mandate visual engagement. Our diagnostic experiments on Qwen2.5-VL reveal a startling capability-utilization gap: despite possessing strong OCR capabilities, models suffer a performance degradation of up to 12.7% in the VQ setting, exposing a deep-seated modality laziness. To bridge this gap, we propose SimpleOCR, a plug-and-play training strategy that imposes a structural constraint on the learning process. By transforming training samples into the VQ format with randomized styles, SimpleOCR effectively invalidates text-based shortcuts, compelling the model to activate and optimize its visual text extraction pathways. Empirically, SimpleOCR yields robust gains without architectural modifications. On four representative OOD benchmarks, it surpasses the base model by 5.4% and GRPO based on original images by 2.7%, while exhibiting extreme data efficiency, achieving superior performance with 30x fewer samples (8.5K) than recent RL-based methods. Furthermore, its plug-and-play nature allows seamless integration with advanced RL strategies like NoisyRollout to yield complementary improvements. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/SimpleOCR.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning has shown strong promise for strengthening the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but sparse, delayed rewards over long chains make token-level credit assignment a central challenge. Actor–critic methods like PPO provide token-level credit but require training a value network alongside the policy, which introduces complexity and can encourage overfitting. Critic-free alternatives such as GRPO avoid this burden but rely on sequence-level outcomes, distributing a single reward uniformly across tokens and ignoring structural differences between responses. We propose Prefix-to-Tree (P2T), which organizes the sampled responses of a prompt into a prefix tree and computes nonparametric prefix values by aggregating descendant outcomes. Building on this idea, we develop TEMPO (Tree-Estimated Mean Prefix Value for Policy Optimization), a critic-free algorithm that enriches GRPO with branch-aware temporal-difference (TD) corrections. Across Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B, TEMPO consistently improves both convergence and final performance over PPO and GRPO on in-distribution benchmarks (MATH, MedQA) and out-of-distribution settings (GSM-HARD, AMC23, MedMCQA, MMLU-Medical), achieving higher validation accuracy within comparable wall-clock time.

Abstract:
Small Vision-Language Models (SVLMs) are efficient task controllers but often suffer from visual brittleness and poor tool orchestration. They typically require expensive supervised trajectory tuning to mitigate these deficits. In this work, we propose Self-supervised Perception Enabled by Cascaded Tool Rollout Alignment (SPECTRA), a supervision-free framework that bootstraps agentic capabilities via Coldstart Reinforcement Learning for SVLMs. SPECTRA enforces Soft Structured Multi-turn Rollouts, a topological constraint that directs agents to explicitly sequence tool derived evidence before synthesis, effectively grounding reasoning in visual observations. We employ a multi-objective reward signal that simultaneously maximizes task correctness, rollout structure, and tool utility, enabling agent to self-discover robust behaviors without human preference labels. We further introduce Tool Instrumental Utility (TIU), a novel metric to quantify tool efficacy in the absence of ground truth. Extensive evaluations across composite and out-of-distribution (MMMU-Pro) benchmarks demonstrate that SPECTRA boosts agentic trajectories, improving task accuracy by up to 5% and tool efficiency by 9%, enabling more efficient multimodal agents that learn effectively from environmental interaction alone.

Abstract:
Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has traditionally focused on binary classification and often lacks the fine-grained categorization and explanatory reasoning required for transparent decision-making. To address these limitations, we propose Time-series Reasoning for Anomaly (Time-RA), a novel task that reformulates TSAD from a discriminative into a generative, reasoning-intensive paradigm. To facilitate this, we introduce RATs40K, the first real-world large-scale multimodal benchmark with ~40,000 samples across 10 domains, integrating raw time series, textual context, and visual plots with structured reasoning annotations. Extensive benchmarking shows that while supervised fine-tuning and visual representations boost diagnostic accuracy and reasoning consistency, performance varies across complex scenarios. Notably, fine-tuned models demonstrate strong "plug-and-play" transferability, outperforming traditional baselines on unseen real-world datasets. Our work establishes a foundation for interpretable, multimodal time series analysis. All code and the RATs40K dataset are fully open-sourced to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
We present VoiceStar, the first zero-shot TTS model that achieves both output duration control and extrapolation. VoiceStar is an autoregressive encoder-decoder neural codec language model, that leverages a novel Progress-Monitoring Rotary Position Embedding (PM-RoPE) and is trained with Continuation-Prompt Mixed (CPM) training. PM-RoPE enables the model to better align text and speech tokens, indicates the target duration for the generated speech, and also allows the model to generate speech waveforms much longer in duration than those seen during training. CPM training also helps to mitigate the training/inference mismatch, and significantly improves the quality of the generated speech in terms of speaker similarity and intelligibility. VoiceStar outperforms or is on par with current state-of-the-art models on short-form benchmarks such as LibriSpeech and Seed-TTS, and significantly outperforms these models on long-form/extrapolation benchmarks (20-50s) in terms of intelligibility and naturalness. Code and model: https://github.com/jasonppy/VoiceStar. Audio samples: https://jasonppy.github.io/VoiceStar_web.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate toxic content, posing significant risks for safe deployment. Current mitigation strategies often degrade generation quality or require costly human annotation. We propose CausalDetox, a framework that identifies and intervenes on the specific attention heads causally responsible for toxic generation. Using the Probability of Necessity and Sufficiency (PNS), we isolate a minimal set of heads that are necessary and sufficient for toxicity. We utilize these components via two complementary strategies: (1) Local Inference-Time Intervention, which constructs dynamic, input-specific steering vectors for context-aware detoxification, and (2) PNS-Guided Fine-Tuning, which permanently unlearns toxic representations. We also introduceParaTox, a novel benchmark of aligned toxic/non-toxic sentence pairs enabling controlled counterfactual evaluation. Experiments on ToxiGen, ImplicitHate, and ParaDetox show that CausalDetox achieves up to 5.34% greater toxicity reduction compared to baselines while preserving linguistic fluency, and offers a 7× speedup in head selection.

Abstract:
Reward-guided search methods have demonstrated strong potential in enhancing tool-using agents by effectively guiding sampling and exploration over complex action spaces. As a core design, those search methods utilize process reward models (PRMs) to provide step-level rewards, enabling more fine-grained monitoring. However, there is a lack of systematic and reliable evaluation benchmarks for PRMs in tool-use settings. In this paper, we introduce ToolPRMBench, a large-scale benchmark specifically designed to evaluate PRMs for tool-using agents. ToolPRMBench is built on top of several representative tool-use benchmarks and converts agent trajectories into step-level test cases. Each case contains the interaction history, a correct action, a plausible but incorrect alternative, and relevant tool metadata. We respectively utilize offline sampling to isolate local single-step errors and online sampling to capture realistic multi-step failures from full agent rollouts. A multi-LLM verification pipeline is proposed to reduce label noise and ensure data quality. We conduct extensive experiments across large language models, general PRMs, and tool-specialized PRMs on ToolPRMBench. The results reveal clear differences in PRM effectiveness and highlight the potential of specialized PRMs for tool-using. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/David-Li0406/ToolPRMBench [More resources on LLM-as-a-judge are on the website: ].

Abstract:
Short-video platforms have become major channels for misinformation, where deceptive claims frequently leverage visual experiments and social cues. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities, their robustness against misinformation entangled with cognitive biases remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework using a high-quality, manually annotated dataset of 200 short videos spanning four health domains. This dataset provides fine-grained annotations for three deceptive patterns—experimental errors, logical fallacies, and fabricated claims—each verified by evidence such as national standards and academic literature. We evaluate eight frontier MLLMs across five modality settings. Experimental results demonstrate that Gemini-2.5-Pro achieves the highest performance in the multimodal setting with a belief score of 71.5/100, while o3 performs the worst at 35.2. Furthermore, we investigate social cues that induce false beliefs in videos and find that models are susceptible to biases like authoritative channel IDs.

Abstract:
The success of large language models (LLMs) across domains highlights their potential in scientific tasks, with molecular optimization being a promising frontier. Traditionally, this optimization relies on iterative expert feedback to refine molecules toward desired properties, a process well aligned with LLMs’ strengths. As an experience-driven task, molecular optimization depends critically on the domain feedback and accumulation of historical knowledge. However, none of the existing methods fully leverages such feedback and historical knowledge with reasoning traces and chemical insights. In this work, we propose F2R: Feedback to Reasoning, a conversational molecular optimization pipeline that enables LLMs to accumulate and retrieve past actions, rationales, and feedback. Like humans, LLMs can generate imperfect reasoning; F2R is the first framework to use detailed domain feedback to critique and improve this reasoning. This transforms LLMs from passive text generators into agentic experts that learn both actions and reasoning from experience. Consequently, F2R shows remarkable performance.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MASs) have shown impressive performance in solving a wide range of complex problems. However, previous studies mainly focus on designing customized MAS for specific tasks, while a critical research problem remains unclear: Do LLM agent groups exhibit a form of “general intelligence” that reflects their general ability across various tasks? Researchers have found a Collective Intelligence (CI) factor in human groups that captures their general capability. Inspired by this, in this study, we aim to investigate whether an analogous CI factor also exists in LLM agent groups, which is crucial for building generalizable MAS. Motivated by human cognitive psychology experiments, we construct 108 LLM agent groups with diverse group sizes, LLM compositions, and communication topologies. We systematically evaluate these groups across a wide range of tasks and analyze their performances. Our results demonstrate that an Artificial Collective Intelligence (ACI) factor can be extracted from LLM agent groups to predict the generalization performance on new tasks. Inspired by this, we train a model to predict the ACI based on the features of MAS, and show that it can be used as a plug-in to enhance the generalization ability of MAS optimization methods.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in Web-scale applications—such as image search, social media captioning, and e-commerce product description generation—where factual consistency is critical for user trust and content reliability. However, we observe that MLLMs frequently hallucinate in these settings due to two relevant phenomena: the massive activation phenomenon and positional information decay. The former refers to the tendency of attention mechanisms to concentrate on a small set of tokens with extreme activation values in query and key projections, which play indispensable roles in contextual understanding. In our investigation, we discover that perturbing these tokens leads to significant performance drops, highlighting their utmost importance. As for positional information decay, it occurs due to the common rotary position encoding strategy, where the attention to early visual tokens diminishes over time, especially in long-sequence generation tasks, such as image caption. To address these challenges, we propose TokenTruth, a token-level intervention strategy that dynamically suppresses irrelevant visual tokens while preserving key contextual signals. Our method is grounded in an in-depth analysis of massive activations and attention sink behaviors, and introduces a targeted token penalty mechanism that reallocates attention more faithfully toward informative visual regions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TokenTruth significantly improves factual consistency across various MLLMs on standard image understanding benchmarks.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly adopted as judges for subjective assessment, yet absolute scoring remains brittle due to inconsistent scales and inherent preference biases. To bridge this gap, we propose S 2 AD (Semantic-Anchored Scale-Agnostic Distillation), a novel easy-to-hard framework that operationalizes subjective assessment as comparative analysis, conceptualizing the judge’s evolution from mimesis to metamorphosis. In Stage 1 (Mimesis), we introduce Dynamic Soft Positioning (DSP) to train the judge to compare a query against retrieved reference images, establishing a relative evaluation space that ensures consistent ordering under heterogeneous scales. In Stage 2 (Metamorphosis), this comparative capability is internalized via Language Buttons—discrete semantic levels serving as a retrieval-free internal reference. Optimized with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), S 2 AD achieves efficient, scale-steerable inference that adapts to diverse grading standards. Our framework reaches state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks, validating the effectiveness of internalized comparative priors for robust, rank-invariant, and scale-steerable evaluation. The code is available at: https://github.com/SpatialVision-Research/SSAD_ACL2026_Findings.

Abstract:
Current evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) primarily rely on static benchmarks, presenting two major challenges: limited knowledge coverage and fixed difficulties that mismatch with the evaluated LLMs. These limitations lead to superficial assessments of LLM knowledge, thereby impeding the targeted model optimizations.To bridge this gap, we propose JudgeAgent, a knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation framework for LLMs.To address the challenge of limited knowledge coverage, JudgeAgent leverages LLM agents equipped with context graphs to traverse knowledge structures systematically for question generation.Furthermore, to mitigate data contamination and difficulty mismatch, it adopts a difficulty-adaptive and multi-turn interview mechanism.Thereby, JudgeAgent can achieve comprehensive evaluations and facilitate more effective improvement of LLMs.Empirical results demonstrate that JudgeAgent enables more comprehensive evaluations and facilitates effective model iterations, highlighting the potential of this knowledge-driven and dynamic evaluation paradigm.The source code is available on https://github.com/DataArcTech/JudgeAgent.

Abstract:
The performance of large language models heavily depends on instruction tuning, especially on task types and mixture ratios. However, previous research has primarily focused on mixing tasks at fixed ratios, lacking a systematic and quantitative analysis of task-wise interactions across diverse tasks. Moreover, it has relied heavily on human labeling. To address these limitations, this study conducts empirical experiments on unlabeled instruction corpora, varying both the number and proportion of task combinations to identify effective mixtures. To minimize manual labeling, we automatically extract five representative tasks—programming, math problem solving, history question answering, grammar correction, and creative writing—using only a few seed instructions. Across 51 mixtures, we find that 1–2 task mixtures work best with small datasets, while synergistic 3-task mixtures excel with larger data. Task interactions reveal both synergy (e.g., programming + math) and interference (e.g., programming + creative writing). These results provide practical guidelines for mixture design tailored to model scale and data size.

Abstract:
Sensitive personal information can appear in large-scale pre-training corpora for large language models (LLMs). Detecting and filtering such information is therefore essential to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and prevent unintended information leakage. However, in contrast to English and other languages, research into sensitive personal information has been limited in the Japanese language. In this study, we focus on sensitive personal data defined as special care-required personal information (SCPI) under Japan’s Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI). We construct an SCPI dataset using LLM-based annotation and train machine learning models to rapidly detect SCPI in text. As a result, our SCPI classifier can effectively identify information related to SCPI. This study is the first to explore SCPI detection in Japanese text corpora, highlighting the challenges of accurate detection.

Abstract:
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) encode rich factual knowledge via cross-modal pre-training, yet their static representations struggle to maintain an accurate understanding of time-sensitive knowledge. Existing benchmarks remain constrained by static designs, inadequately evaluating LMMs’ ability to understand time-sensitive knowledge. To address this gap, we propose MINED, a comprehensive benchmark containing 2,104 time-sensitive knowledge samples spanning six knowledge types, which evaluates temporal awareness along 6 key dimensions and 11 challenging tasks: cognition, awareness, trustworthiness, understanding, reasoning, and robustness. Evaluating 15 widely used LMMs on MINED shows that Gemini-2.5-Pro achieves the highest average CEM score of 63.07, while most open-source LMMs still lack time understanding ability. Meanwhile, LMMs perform best on organization knowledge, whereas their performance is weakest on sport. To address these challenges, we investigate the feasibility of updating time-sensitive knowledge in LMMs through knowledge editing methods and observe that LMMs can effectively update knowledge via knowledge editing methods in single editing scenarios.

Abstract:
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) organizes external knowledge as a hierarchical graph, enabling efficient retrieval and aggregation of scattered evidence across multiple documents. However, many existing benchmarks for GraphRAG rely on short, curated passages as external knowledge, failing to adequately evaluate systems in realistic settings involving long contexts and large-scale heterogeneous documents. To bridge this gap, we introduce , a benchmark designed to assess GraphRAG performance in the wild. We leverage Wikipedia’s unique structure, where cohesive narratives are grounded in long and heterogeneous external reference documents, to construct a benchmark reflecting real-word scenarios. Specifically, we sample articles across 12 top-level topics, using their external references as the retrieval corpus and citation-linked statements as ground truth, resulting in 1,100 questions spanning three levels of complexity: single-fact QA, multi-fact QA, and section-level summarization. Experiments across multiple baselines reveal that current GraphRAG pipelines help on multi-fact aggregation when evidence comes from a moderate number of sources, but this aggregation paradigm may overemphasize high-level statements at the expense of fine-grained details, leading to weaker performance on summarization tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in financial scenarios. However, they may produce harmful outputs, including facilitating illegal activities or unethical behavior, posing serious compliance risks. To systematically evaluate LLM safety in finance, we propose FinSafetyBench, a bilingual (English-Chinese) red-teaming benchmark designed to test an LLM’s refusal of requests that violate financial compliance. Grounded in real-world financial crime cases and ethics standards, the benchmark comprises 14 subcategories spanning financial crimes and ethical violations. Through extensive experiments on general-purpose and finance-specialized LLMs under three representative attack settings, we identify critical vulnerabilities that allow adversarial prompts to bypass compliance safeguards. Further analysis reveals stronger susceptibility in Chinese contexts and highlights the limitations of prompt-level defenses against sophisticated or implicit manipulation strategies.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) rely on tool use to act as autonomous agents, yet often fail in multi-step execution due to insufficient tool-related knowledge and ineffective knowledge activation. Therefore, we present a systematic study on how knowledge influences tool-use performance, covering the stages of knowledge acquisition, activation, and internalization. In the knowledge acquisition stage, we acquire and evaluate various forms of experiential knowledge, and our analysis shows that simple instance-level knowledge can already provide strong and reliable gains, while abstract intent-level knowledge offers limited benefits. At inference time, to activate knowledge, we find that prompting LLM to expand the depth of reasoning yields diminishing returns, whereas expanding the width of reasoning by parallel sampling with aggregation more effectively activates latent experiential knowledge. At training time, for knowledge internalization, post-training with knowledge-augmented data further improves performance, with reinforcement learning outperforming supervised fine-tuning. Based on these insights, we propose the Knowledge-Augmented Tool Execution (KATE), a knowledge-augmented tool execution framework that integrates experiential knowledge with reasoning-width-expanded inference and knowledge-aware training. Experiments on BFCL-V3 and AppWorld demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements over strong baselines across model scales. Our Code is available at https://github.com/hypasd-art/KATE.

Abstract:
Existing LLM-based agents primarily utilize coarse-grained experiential memory, where experiences are retrieved based on global task or scene context. While effective in simple settings, such coarse-grained memory lacks the situational alignment required for complex multi-step decision-making. As a result, recalled experiences often fail to match the agent’s current state, blurring reasoning focus and leading to inaccurate decisions at critical steps. To this end, we propose State-Aware memory(SAMem), a new fine-grained memory paradigm for LLM agents that explicitly aligns memory retrieval with the current state. Instead of storing and reusing globally shared experiences, SAMem organizes memory at the level of state-specific reasoning thoughts, enabling the agent to retrieve only the most relevant experience for the current decision context. This state-conditioned memory allows the agent to focus on the most informative reasoning cues at each step, rather than being distracted by task-level but state-misaligned guidance. Extensive experiments on complex decision-making benchmarks demonstrate that SAMem outperforms existing experiential memory approaches, achieving superior performance and substantially improved task-solving efficiency. These results indicate that state-aware, fine-grained memory enhances the decision-making capabilities of LLM agents.

Abstract:
While large language models show promise in medical applications, achieving expert-level clinical reasoning efficiently remains challenging due to the need for massive amounts of manually labeled data and large-scale models. To address this challenge, we propose Clinical-Oriented Reinforcement Learning (CORL), the first fully open-source, end-to-end reinforcement learning training pipeline in the clinical reasoning domain, incorporating a Reasoning-Oriented Data Strategy (RODS) based on topological synthesis, CoT cold-start, and two-stage reinforcement learning. Through CORL, we trained the Fleming-R1 series of models. Among them, Fleming-R1-7B significantly outperforms models of comparable size while approaching or even surpassing certain 32B and 72B models. Fleming-R1-32B achieves near-parity with GPT-4o and outperforms the strongest open-source alternatives up to 671B in MedXpertQA. This demonstrates that in clinical reasoning field, a meticulously designed training pipeline holds greater importance than scaling model size alone. Data and Models are available at https://github.com/UbiquantAI/Fleming-R1 and https://huggingface.co/collections/IQuestLab/fleming.

Abstract:
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a fundamental post-training strategy to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent. However, traditional SFT often ignores the one-to-many nature of language by forcing alignment with a single reference answer, leading to the model overfitting to non-core expressions. Although our empirical analysis suggests that introducing multiple reference answers can mitigate this issue, the prohibitive data and computational costs necessitate a strategic shift: prioritizing the mitigation of single-reference overfitting over the costly pursuit of answer diversity. To achieve this, we reveal the intrinsic connection between token probability and semantic importance: high-probability tokens carry the core logical framework, while low-probability tokens are mostly replaceable expressions. Based on this insight, we propose ProFit , which selectively masks low-probability tokens to prevent surface-level overfitting. Extensive experiments confirm that ProFit consistently outperforms traditional SFT baselines on general reasoning and mathematical benchmarks

Abstract:
Mathematical reasoning has long been a key benchmark for evaluating large language models. Although substantial progress has been made on math word problems, the need for reasoning over tabular data in real-world applications has been overlooked. For instance, applications such as business intelligence demand not only multi-step numerical reasoning with tables but also robustness to incomplete or inconsistent information. However, comprehensive evaluation in this area is severely limited, constrained by the reliance on manually collected tables that are difficult to scale and the lack of coverage for potential traps encountered in real-world scenarios. To address this problem, we propose AutoT2T, a neuro-symbolic framework that controllably transforms math word problems into scalable and verified tabular reasoning tasks. Building on this pipeline, we develop TabularMath, a benchmark comprising four subsets that include both text-based and image-based tables, covering table complexity, table quality, and table representation dimensions. Our study reveals three key observations: (1) Table complexity and reasoning difficulty impact reasoning performance jointly; (2) Low-quality tables pose severe risks to reliable reasoning in current LLMs; (3) Different table modalities show similar trends, with text-based tables typically being easier for models to reason over. In-depth analyses are conducted for each observation to guide future research.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are widely used to mitigate the stateless nature of Large Language Models (LLMs) in long-term and personalized interactions by incorporating external memory. However, existing approaches often prioritize memory organization, such as knowledge graphs, while overlooking a critical semantic gap between implicit, intent-driven queries and explicit, narrative-based memories. To bridge this gap, we propose QueryLink, a novel framework that leverages Query-Memory Alignment to project both queries and memories into a shared semantic space. It significantly boosts recall by facilitating multi-grained retrieval of semantically relevant information. To further enhance memory retrieval, we leverage Coherent Memory Chunking, a mechanism that processes memories in multi-turn dialogue units, preserving semantic integrity, rather than relying on fixed-size segments. Extensive experiments on the LoCoMo and LongMemEval benchmark demonstrate that QueryLink significantly outperforms SOTA methods, achieving at least a 7% improvement in reasoning accuracy (measured by LLM). Additionally, QueryLink can be integrated as a plug-and-play component to boost existing vector-based systems like A-MEM, leading to improvements of over 6% in both F1 and B1 scores.The code is available at https://github.com/Dontplay0112/querylink.

Abstract:
Previous LLMs-based RL studies typically follow either supervised learning with high annotation costs, or unsupervised paradigms using voting or entropy-based rewards. However, their performance remains far from satisfactory due to the substantial annotation cost and issues such as model collapse or reward hacking. To address these issues, we introduce a new perspective inspired by cognitive learning theory and propose a novel approach called EasyRL. The core of EasyRL is to simulate the human cognitive acquisition curve by integrating reliable knowledge transfer from easy labeled data with a progressive divide-and-conquer strategy that tackles increasingly difficult unlabeled data. Specifically, we initialize a warm-up model using supervised RL with few-shot labeled data. This is followed by a divide-and-conquer pseudo-labeling strategy on difficult unlabeled data, combining consistency-based selection for low-uncertainty cases and reflection-based resolution for medium-uncertainty cases. Finally, difficulty-progressive self-training with iterative pseudo-labeling and RL further strengthens the model’s reasoning capability. EasyRL provides a unified self-evolving framework that facilitates data-efficient post-training of LLMs. Experimental results on mathematical and scientific benchmarks demonstrate that EasyRL, using only 10% of easy labeled data, consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLM-based agents) are capable of using off-the-shelf tools to interact with the environment, solve real-world problems, and boost work efficiency. However, current approaches to enhancing tool use for LLM-based agents primarily focus on post-training fine-tuning or test-time context extension. These methods overlook the fundamental tool knowledge acquisition during the early training phase, where models actually learn and internalize core knowledge representations, restricting model performance on out-of-distribution tool usage. To solve such a problem, we introduce enhancing tool knowledge for LLM-based agents during c ontinuous p re- t raining ( ToolCPT ). We identify and bridge a key gap in current LLM training by shifting focus from tool-calling patterns to deep internalization of core tool-knowledge representations. We begin by curating 5.1 million code artifacts from large-scale, high-quality code repositories. These artifacts are selected based on a set of criteria that defines a usable "proxy agent tool", thereby forming a comprehensive agent tool library. For each proxy tool, we then create a detailed playbook covering implementation specifications, core functionalities, interaction protocols with other tools, and illustrative positive and negative examples. This process yields a large-scale tool knowledge corpus comprising 18 billion tokens, which is used to continuously pre-train our model. Experiments show our playbook-enhanced corpus catalyzes deep knowledge internalization, driving the model to notable performance gains on multiple standard benchmarks.

Abstract:
Multi-agent simulation based on LLMs has increasingly emerged as a new paradigm for exploring complex social phenomena and validating theoretical hypotheses. However, traditional experimental design in the social sciences relies heavily on interdisciplinary expert knowledge, involving cumbersome procedures and high technical barriers. While LLM-driven agents demonstrate broad prospects for designing experiments, their limitations regarding reliability and scientific rigor continue to significantly hinder their in-depth application in social science research. To address these challenges, this paper proposes FSTS, an automated framework for multi-agent experiment design based on script generation. Drawing on the concept of the "Decision Theater," the framework deconstructs experimental design into three core phases: Script Composition, Script Finalization, and Actor Generation. Tests across multiple scenarios indicate that the agents generated by this framework can enact the script within the "experimental theater," reproducing results consistent with real-world situations. The proposal of FSTS not only effectively lowers the barrier for social science experimental design but also provides scientifically grounded decision support for policy-making.

Abstract:
Temporal knowledge graph question answering (TKGQA) addresses time-sensitive queries over temporal knowledge graphs, but existing approaches struggle with multi-hop reasoning and implicit temporal constraints. We introduce TempTool-R1, a novel tool-integrated reasoning framework that enables large language models to explicitly use temporal tools for precise reasoning. First, we design a unified temporal tool-based API capable of transforming implicit temporal cues into executable operations, establishing the structural foundation for tool interaction. In the second stage, supervised fine-tuning teaches the model to interweave chain-of-thought reasoning with think-then-tool usage, allowing it to call temporal tools during inference. Finally, we apply reinforcement learning with fine-grained, order-sensitive reward functions tailored for temporal tool use, further refining the model’s tool-use policy. Experiments on three challenging TKGQA benchmarks demonstrate that TempTool-R1 significantly outperforms existing methods. In particular, our approach excels on complex questions requiring multi-hop temporal reasoning, highlighting the effectiveness of temporal tool integration and reward optimization in improving TKGQA performance.

Abstract:
Evaluating personality-related tendencies in Large Language Models (LLMs) helps characterize model behavior, compare models beyond task accuracy, and support responsible deployment in socially interactive settings. However, existing questionnaire-based evaluation methods exhibit limited stability and offer little explainability, as their results are highly sensitive to minor variations in prompt phrasing or role-play configurations. To address these limitations, we propose an internal-activation–based approach, termed Persona-Vector Neutrality Interpolation (PVNI), for stable and explainable personality trait evaluation in LLMs. PVNI extracts a persona vector associated with a target personality trait from the model’s internal activations using contrastive prompts. It then estimates the corresponding neutral score by interpolating along the persona vector as an anchor axis, enabling an interpretable comparison between the neutral prompt representation and the persona direction. We provide a theoretical analysis of the effectiveness and generalization properties of PVNI. Extensive experiments across diverse LLMs demonstrate that PVNI yields substantially more stable personality trait evaluations than existing methods, even under questionnaire and role-play variants.

Abstract:
The paradigm of programmable diagram generation is evolving rapidly, playing a crucial role in structured visualization. However, most existing studies are confined to a narrow range of task formulations and language support, constraining their applicability to diverse diagram types. In this work, we propose OmniDiagram, a unified framework that incorporates diverse diagram code languages and task definitions. To address the challenge of aligning code logic with visual fidelity in Reinforcement Learning (RL), we introduce a novel visual feedback strategy named Visual Interrogation Verifies All (Viva). Unlike brittle syntax-based rules or pixel-level matching, Viva rewards the visual structure of rendered diagrams through a generative approach. Specifically, Viva actively generates targeted visual inquiries to scrutinize diagram visual fidelity and provides fine-grained feedback for optimization. This mechanism facilitates a self-evolving training process, effectively obviating the need for manually annotated ground truth code. Furthermore, we construct M3 2 Diagram, the first large-scale diagram code generation dataset, containing over 196k high-quality instances. Experimental results confirm that the combination of SFT and our Viva-based RL allows OmniDiagram to establish a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) across diagram code generation benchmarks.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) encode vast factual knowledge, yet their inability to selectively forget specific information hinders privacy protection, bias mitigation, and post-deployment correction. We present LoRA-based Unlearning with Negative Examples (LUNE), a lightweight framework that performs negative-only unlearning by updating only low-rank adapters while freezing the backbone, thereby localizing edits and avoiding disruptive global changes. Leveraging Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), LUNE targets intermediate representations to suppress (or replace) requested knowledge with an order-of-magnitude lower compute and memory than full fine-tuning or direct weight editing. Extensive experiments on multiple factual unlearning tasks show that LUNE: (I) achieves effectiveness comparable to full fine-tuning and memory-editing methods; and (II) reduces computational cost by about an order of magnitude.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, while recent prompting strategies such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) have further elevated their performance in handling complex logical problems. Despite these advances, high-quality reasoning remains heavily reliant on manual static prompts and is sensitive to decoding configurations and task distributions, leading to performance fluctuations and limited transferability. Existing automatic prompt optimization methods typically adopt single-agent local search, failing to simultaneously optimize prompts and decoding hyperparameters within a unified framework to achieve stable global improvements. To address this limitation, we propose Agent-GWO, a dynamic prompt optimization framework for complex reasoning. Specifically, we unify prompt templates and decoding hyperparameters as inheritable agent configurations. By leveraging the leader-follower mechanism of the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), we automatically select three leader agents ( 𝛼 , 𝛽 , and 𝛿 ) to guide the collaborative updates of the remaining agents, enabling iterative convergence toward robust optimal reasoning configurations that can be seamlessly integrated for inference. Extensive experiments on multiple mathematical and hybrid reasoning benchmarks across diverse LLM backbones show that Agent-GWO consistently improves accuracy and stability over existing prompt optimization methods.

Abstract:
Large language model agents heavily rely on external memory to support knowledge reuse and complex reasoning tasks. Yet most memory systems store experiences in a single global retrieval pool which can gradually dilute or corrupt stored knowledge. This problem is especially pronounced for small language models (SLMs), which are highly vulnerable to irrelevant context. We introduce CLAG, a CLustering-based AGentic memory framework where an agent actively organizes memory. CLAG employs an SLM-agent driven router to assign each new memory to a semantically coherent cluster. By performing continual evolution within the cluster, it effectively reduces cross-topic interference. During the retrieval phase, CLAG targets a small set of relevant clusters for retrieval, thereby excluding distractors and reducing the search space. Experiments on multiple QA datasets with three SLM backbones show that CLAG consistently improves answer quality and robustness over prior memory systems for agents, remaining lightweight and efficient.

Abstract:
Procedural memory enables large language model (LLM) agents to internalize ”how-to” knowledge and thus reduce redundant trial-and-error. However, existing frameworks predominantly suffer from a ”passive accumulation” paradigm, treating memory as a static append-only archive. To bridge the gap between static storage and dynamic reasoning, we propose ReMe (Remember Me, Refine Me), a comprehensive framework for experience-driven agent evolution. ReMe manages the memory lifecycle via three mechanisms: 1) multi-faceted distillation, which extracts fine-grained experiences by recognizing success patterns, analyzing failure triggers and generating comparative insights; 2) context-adaptive reuse, which tailors historical insights to new contexts through scenario-aware indexing; and 3) utility-based refinement, which automatically adds validated memories and prunes outdated ones to maintain a compact, high-quality experience pool. Experiments on BFCL-V3 and AppWorld demonstrate that ReMe establishes a new state-of-the-art in agent memory system. Crucially, we observe a significant memory-scaling effect: Qwen3-8B equipped with ReMe outperforms larger, memoryless Qwen3-14B, indicating that self-evolving memory provides a computation-efficient path for lifelong learning.

Abstract:
Large language models generate computationally expensive yet semantically void reasoning on beyond-capability tasks, creating safety risks where plausible-sounding but incorrect derivations mislead users. We characterize this futile reasoning phenomenon through systematic analysis, revealing universal capability overreach and systematic miscalibration towards over-confidence. The dominant failure mode is specious reasoning, superficially valid outputs with subtle hallucinations, which escalates with task difficulty. We demonstrate that prompt engineering proves insufficient to calibrate refusal behavior. To address this, we introduce CaRL (Capability-aligned Reinforcement Learning), which aligns model behavior with capability boundaries through reward shaping that incentivizes refusal over hallucination and hindsight augmentation that converts failures into refusal supervision. Experiments demonstrate a substantial reduction in futile reasoning while preserving performance across task difficulties, effectively achieving capability-aligned behavior without sacrificing utility.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) substantially enhance developer productivity in repository-level code generation through interactive collaboration. However, as interactions progress, repository context must be continuously preserved and updated to integrate newly validated information. Meanwhile, the expanding session history increases cognitive burden, often leading to forgetting and the reintroduction of previously resolved errors. Existing memory management approaches show promise but remain limited by natural language-centric representations. To overcome these limitations, we propose CodeMEM, an AST-guided dynamic memory management system tailored for repository-level iterative code generation. Specifically, CodeMEM introduces the Code Context Memory component that dynamically maintains and updates repository context through AST-guided LLM operations, along with the Code Session Memory that constructs a code-centric representation of interaction history and explicitly detects and mitigates forgetting through AST-based analysis. Experimental results on the instruction-following benchmark CodeIF-Bench and the code generation benchmark CoderEval demonstrate that CodeMEM achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving instruction following by 12.2% for the current turn and 11.5% for the session level, and reducing interaction rounds by 2–3, while maintaining competitive inference latency and token efficiency.

Abstract:
Egocentric AI agents, such as smart glasses, rely on pointing gestures to resolve referential ambiguities in natural language commands. However, despite advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), current systems often fail to precisely ground the spatial semantics of pointing. Instead, they rely on spurious correlations with visual proximity or object saliency—a phenomenon we term “Referential Hallucination.” To address this gap, we introduce EgoPoint-Bench, a comprehensive question-answering benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance multimodal pointing reasoning in egocentric views. Comprising over 11k high-fidelity simulated and real-world samples, the benchmark spans five evaluation dimensions and three levels of referential complexity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that while state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source models struggle with egocentric pointing, models fine-tuned on our synthetic data achieve significant performance gains and robust Sim-to-Real generalization. This work highlights the importance of spatially-aware supervision and offers a scalable path toward precise egocentric AI assistants. The project website is available at https://guyyyug.github.io/EgoPoint-Bench/ .

Abstract:
Extending the input modality of Large Language Models (LLMs) to the audio domain is essential for achieving comprehensive multimodal perception. However, it is well-known that acoustic information is intrinsically heterogeneous, entangling attributes such as speech, music, and environmental context. Existing research is limited to a dense, parameter-shared adapter to model these diverse patterns, which induces gradient conflict during optimization, as parameter updates required for distinct attributes contradict each other. To address this limitation, we introduce the MoE-Adapter, a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture designed to decouple acoustic information. Specifically, it employs a dynamic gating mechanism that routes audio tokens to specialized experts capturing complementary feature subspaces while retaining shared experts for global context, thereby mitigating gradient conflicts and enabling fine-grained feature learning. Comprehensive experiments show that the MoE-Adapter achieves superior performance on both audio semantic and paralinguistic tasks, consistently outperforming dense linear baselines with comparable computational costs. To facilitate future research, our code are publicly available at https://github.com/Alittleegg/Eureka-Audio.

Abstract:
Emotional support conversation systems strive to emulate the empathetic depth of human therapists, yet current approaches often fail due to the "Cognitive Gap"—the inability to discern the latent psychological evaluations driving a user’s distress. Existing retrieval-augmented generation paradigms exacerbate this by relying on semantic similarity, frequently retrieving historical dialogues that are surface analogous but therapeutically incongruent. To bridge this gap, we introduce Appraisal-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning & Retrieval (AG-CTR²) for better emotional support. Specifically, we bootstrap the MLLM to generate appraisal-guided reasoning chains and apply a dual-signal verification mechanism using ground-truth emotion labels and a teacher model to verify and correct them. Under such instance-level guidance, we finetune the MLLM to internalize such reasoning capability. At inference, the model utilizes its generated appraisal chain as a structured query to help retrieve historical therapeutic responses based on psychological situation similarity rather than content surface proximity. Extensive experiments and analyses on two ESC benchmarks demonstrate that AG-CTR² significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Estimating the persuasiveness of messages is critical in various applications, from recommender systems to safety assessment of LLMs. While it is imperative to consider the target persuadee’s characteristics, such as their values, experiences, and reasoning styles, there is currently no established systematic framework to optimize leveraging a persuadee’s past activities (e.g., conversations) to the benefit of a persuasiveness prediction model. To address this problem, we propose a context-aware user profiling framework with two trainable components: a query generator that generates optimal queries to retrieve persuasion-relevant records from a user’s history, and a profiler that summarizes these records into a profile to effectively inform the persuasiveness prediction model.Our evaluation on the ChangeMyView Reddit dataset shows consistent improvements over existing methods across multiple predictor models, raising F1 from 33% to 47% on Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct. Further analysis shows that effective user profiles are context-dependent and predictor-specific, rather than relying on static attributes or surface-level similarity. Together, these results highlight the importance of task-oriented, context-dependent user profiling for personalized persuasiveness prediction.

Abstract:
Automatic instruction generation offers a low-cost, high-efficiency pathway for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods struggle in knowledge-intensive domains and complex reasoning tasks due to their dependence on high-quality seed data, limited coverage of single-document knowledge, and repetitive content. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents GCIG, a GraphRAG-based Cross-document Instruction Generation framework. We begin by constructing an enhanced knowledge graph to provide a structural representation of the raw corpus, followed by LLM-driven selection of reliable subgraph-text pairs based on factuality and logical complementarity. Subsequently, we adaptively generate diverse questions through task-aware prompts and context-sensitive retrieval. Finally, we employ Chain-of-Thought reasoning to anchor entity paths and integrate scattered evidence, thereby closing logical gaps and improving answer coherence. Experiments on knowledge-intensive and multi-hop question-answering tasks demonstrate that GCIG outperforms existing methods, producing instruction data with stronger logical consistency and broader knowledge coverage for effective LLM fine-tuning. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/WhitEiller/GCIG.

Abstract:
Safety alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs) remains highly fragile during fine-tuning, where even benign adaptation can degrade pre-trained refusal behaviors and enable harmful responses. Existing defenses typically constrain either weights or activations in isolation, without considering their coupled effects on safety. In this paper, we first theoretically demonstrate that constraining either weights or activations alone is insufficient for safety preservation. To robustly preserve safety alignment, we propose Coupled Weight and Activation Constraints (CWAC), a novel approach that simultaneously enforces a precomputed safety subspace on weight updates and applies targeted regularization to safety-critical features identified by sparse autoencoders. Extensive experiments across four widely used LLMs and diverse downstream tasks show that CWAC consistently achieves the lowest harmful scores with minimal impact on fine-tuning accuracy, substantially outperforming strong baselines even under high harmful data ratios.

Abstract:
Existing Graphical User Interface (GUI) reasoning tasks remain challenging, particularly in UI understanding. Current methods typically rely on direct screen-based decision-making, which lacks interpretability and overlooks a comprehensive understanding of UI elements, ultimately leading to task failure. To enhance the understanding and interaction with UIs, we propose an innovative GUI reasoning paradigm called UI-in-the-Loop (UILoop). Our approach treats the GUI reasoning task as a cyclic Screen-UI elements-Action process. By enabling Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to explicitly learn the localization, semantic functions, and practical usage of key UI elements, UILoop achieves precise element discovery and performs interpretable reasoning. Furthermore, we introduce a more challenging UI Comprehension task centered on UI elements with three evaluation metrics. Correspondingly, we contribute a benchmark of 26K samples (UI Comprehension-Bench) to comprehensively evaluate existing methods’ mastery of UI elements. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UILoop achieves state-of-the-art UI understanding performance while yielding superior results in GUI reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve remarkable performance by explicitly generating multi-step chains of thought, but this capability incurs substantial inference latency and computational cost. Collaborative inference offers a promising solution by selectively allocating work between lightweight and large models, yet a fundamental challenge remains: determining when a reasoning step requires the capacity of a large model or the efficiency of a small model. Existing routing strategies either rely on local token probabilities or post-hoc verification, introducing significant inference overhead. In this work, we propose a novel perspective on step-wise collaboration: the difficulty of a reasoning step can be inferred from its very first token. Inspired by the “Aha Moment” phenomenon in LRMs, we show that the entropy of the initial token serves as a strong predictor of step difficulty. Building on this insight, we introduce GlimpRouter, a training-free step-wise collaboration framework. GlimpRouter employs a lightweight model to generate only the first token of each reasoning step and routes the step to a larger model only when the initial token entropy exceeds a threshold. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces inference latency while preserving accuracy. For instance, GlimpRouter attains a substantial 10.7% improvement in accuracy while reducing inference latency by 25.9% compared to a standalone large model on AIME25. These results suggest a simple yet effective mechanism for reasoning: allocating computation based on a glimpse of thought rather than full-step evaluation.

Abstract:
Vision–language models (VLMs) have progressed rapidly, but Tibetan remains largely underserved due to the lack of infrastructure for reproducible training and evaluation. To help address this gap, we introduce FTibSuite, a resource-centric foundation for Tibetan VLM research that provides an end-to-end training-and-evaluation workflow and includes human-verified multimodal annotations, partially filling a long-standing shortage of Tibetan multimodal resources. FTibSuite comprises FTibData, FTibBench, and a reproducible baseline model, FTibVLM, built on Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct. FTibVLM adopts a three-stage adaptation pipeline consisting of Tibetan continual pretraining, image–text alignment, and multimodal instruction tuning. For systematic evaluation, FTibBench adapts five established multimodal benchmarks to Tibetan and offers a reproducible evaluation protocol to support consistent comparisons across models. Specifically, FTibBench includes Tibetan versions of MMBench, MME, POPE, BinaryVQA, and COREVQA. Experiments on FTibBench demonstrate that FTibVLM consistently improves Tibetan multimodal performance. For instance, FTibVLM attains 76.01 accuracy on BinaryVQA, indicating that Tibetan performance can be competitive with high-resource settings on this diagnostic task. We also observe substantial gains on other benchmarks, including an improvement on MMBench (dev) from 42.97 to 67.78 and an increase in POPE-random accuracy from 47.53 to 80.56, underscoring the practical value of the proposed workflow and resources.

Abstract:
Low-rank decomposition, particularly Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), is a pivotal technique for mitigating the storage and computational demands of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, prevalent SVD-based approaches overlook the critical phenomenon that decomposition errors exhibit significant disparity across different components of the parameter matrix, often leading to suboptimal approximation. Furthermore, existing methods lack a direct metric to evaluate the importance of individual weight matrices. To address these limitations, we propose Duo-SVD (Dual-level Optimization SVD), a novel training-free framework that synergizes optimization at both the column and the module levels. First, Duo-SVD incorporates a Column-Preserving Strategy that explicitly retains columns exhibiting high decomposition errors, while applying low-rank approximation solely to those with lower errors. Second, at the module level, we employ a Module-Adaptive Allocation Strategy that formulates ratio allocation as a global constrained optimization problem based on perturbation-induced model deviation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Duo-SVD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art SVD-based baselines and structured pruning methods, establishing it as a superior paradigm for efficient LLM compression.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are gaining increasing attention. Due to the heterogeneity of their input features, they face significant challenges in terms of jailbreak defenses. Current defense methods rely on costly fine-tuning or inefficient post-hoc interventions, limiting their ability to address novel attacks and involving performance trade-offs. To address the above issues, we explore the endogenous safety capabilities within MLLMs and quantify their intrinsic ability to discern harmfulness at both encoding and decoding stages. We observe that 1) MLLMs can distinguish the harmful and harmless inputs during decoding process, 2) Image-based attacks are more stealthy. Based on these insights, we introduce SafeSteer, a decoding-level defense mechanism for MLLMs. Specifically, it employs a lightweight discriminator, based on the MLLM’s own discriminative ability, to iteratively steer the decoding process toward safety. A safety alignment vector is also integrated to handle complex multimodal threats. Experiments on multiple MLLMs demonstrate that our proposed method can improve safety performance by up to 33.40% without fine-tuning.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely employed to mitigate risks such as hallucinations and knowledge obsolescence in medical question answering, yet its predominantly single-round, static retrieval paradigm misaligns with the multi-stage process of clinical reasoning. This compressed workflow induces two structural deficiencies: question-to-query translation often lacks clinically grounded semantic interpretation, and retrieval lacks iterative sufficiency feedback, making it difficult to form reliable evidence chains. We argue that both issues stem from a deeper cause—overloading a single reasoning chain with heterogeneous tasks of interpretation, exploration, and adjudication—and that the remedy is to reconstruct the workflow via task decoupling and dynamic multi-round exploration. To this end, we propose the Self-Evolving Multi-Agent framework SEMA-RAG, which assigns these roles to three specialist agents: Interpreter Agent for clinical schema interpretation, Explorer Agent for sufficiency-driven self-evolving retrieval, and Arbiter Agent for evidence adjudication and answer selection. Across five benchmarks and five LLM backbones, SEMA-RAG improves the strongest baseline by +6.46 accuracy points on average, measured per backbone.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) face significant safety challenges from jailbreak attacks, techniques that manipulate prompts to bypass defenses and elicit harmful outputs. Existing taxonomies focus on manipulation methods rather than underlying mechanisms, limiting our understanding of attack effectiveness and defensive strategies.In this work, we survey existing LLM jailbreak attacks and organize them using a novel two-fold taxonomy. Our technical taxonomy categorizes attacks across three tiers based on exploited vulnerabilities and approaches. Our operational taxonomy evaluates attacks across four dimensions to assess real-world feasibility and sustainability. Through correlation analysis, we reveal relationships between LLM vulnerabilities and practical attack constraints.Applying our taxonomies to existing attacks identifies research gaps and provides insights for developing stronger offensive and defensive methods. Our work can contribute to systematic, risk-informed security improvements for LLMs, helping the research community move beyond reactive defenses.

Abstract:
Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems are vital for facilitating complex, goal-directed interactions across sectors like customer support and online retail. However, they face persistent limitations: labor-intensive manual metadata tuning and sparse reinforcement learning (RL) rewards that fail to diagnose invocation errors. To address this, we propose ToolDNA, a dynamic adaptation framework enabling autonomous co-evolution of policy networks and tool metadata via RL, anchored by two synergistic loops. An RL loop optimizes policies by generating rollout trajectories (reasoning, actions, descriptive updates) from user inputs, with multi-dimensional rewards refining invocations. A tool metadata loop—coordinated by a dedicated Tool Manager—evolves metadata through policy-generated candidates during rollouts and Feedback LLM-derived refinements from historical data. These mutually reinforcing loops close traditional reward gaps, forming a closed-loop trial-error-reflection cycle for self-improvement. Extensive experiments on a real-world dataset of 3,100 customer service dialogues confirm ToolDNA’s superiority, with notable gains over baselines: it achieves +11% problem resolution and +54% accuracy over commercial LLMs with prompt engineering; +25%/+35% over supervised fine-tuning; and +15%/+15% over traditional RL baseline. Linguistic analysis corroborates evolved metadata retain semantic intent while enhancing parseability. Case studies in two typical contexts, i.e., car inventory search and loan calculation, further validates its ability to resolve critical ambiguities. ToolDNA pioneers scalable self-improvement for robust, deployable tool-augmented agents with minimal human oversight. We release our code to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities but remain vulnerable to adversarial “jailbreak” attacks designed to bypass safety guardrails. Current safety alignment methods depend heavily on static external red teaming, utilizing fixed defense prompts or pre-collected adversarial datasets. This leads to a rigid defense that overfits known patterns and fails to generalize to novel, sophisticated threats. To address this critical limitation, we propose empowering the model to be its own red teamer, capable of achieving autonomous and evolving adversarial attacks. Specifically, we introduce Safety Self- Play (SSP), a system that utilizes a single LLM to act concurrently as both the Attacker (generating jailbreaks) and the Defender (refusing harmful requests) within a unified Reinforcement Learning (RL) loop, dynamically evolving attack strategies to uncover vulnerabilities while simultaneously strengthening defense mechanisms. To ensure the Defender effectively addresses critical safety issues during the self-play, we introduce an advanced Reflective Experience Replay Mechanism, which uses an experience pool accumulated throughout the process. The mechanism employs a Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) sampling strategy to focus on failure cases with low rewards, helping the model learn from past hard mistakes while balancing exploration and exploitation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our SSP approach autonomously evolves robust defense capabilities, significantly outperforming baselines trained on static adversarial datasets and establishing a new benchmark for proactive safety alignment.

Abstract:
Emotional Text-to-Speech aims to synthesize speech with human-like naturalness and expressiveness. However, existing systems rely on sentence-level labels, which fails to capture the subtle nuances of human affect. Based on cognitive appraisal theories, we argue that emotional expression is not generated in isolation but is deeply influenced by speaker’s Personal Experience and the conversational Context.To overcome the information bottleneck inherent in traditional annotations, we present Emotional-Context-Speech, a large-scale, context-aware speech corpus derived from multi-speaker audiobooks. This dataset provides not only transcriptions but also dialogue context, personal experience, open-vocabulary emotion labels, and paralinguistic descriptions.Experimental results demonstrate that TTS model trained using additional context and experience descriptions as inputs, called Emotional-Context-TTS, significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of emotional expression accuracy and naturalness.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems rely on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to ingest knowledge from unstructured documents. However, OCR engines often struggle with complex layouts, introducing Structural Noise , such as line insertion and paragraph interleaving, which disrupts the semantic flow of the text. Existing evaluations largely overlook this dimension, operating on the assumption of structurally perfect input. To bridge this gap, we introduce StruNRAG, a dedicated benchmark for evaluating RAG robustness against OCR-induced structural perturbations. We construct a bilingual dataset of 2,132 question-answer pairs derived from complex Chinese and English documents and systematically inject three categories of real-world structural noise: line insertion, paragraph interleaving, and line interleaving. Our evaluation of mainstream retrievers and Large Language Models (LLMs) reveals a nuanced interaction between noise and pipeline stages: while structural distortions consistently degrade retrieval performance, the generation stage exhibits unexpected robustness. Advanced LLMs demonstrate robustness against local noise (e.g., line insertion), but struggle to maintain reasoning capabilities under severe structural disruption that fragments global context. These findings indicate that while LLMs are capable of compensating for minor parsing errors, future RAG optimizations must take into account the effects of structural noise. Our code and datasets are available at [https://github.com/GaoMengnana/StruNRAG](https://github.com/GaoMengnana/StruNRAG).

Abstract:
While Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in understanding and generation, their potential privacy implications remain largely unexplored. This paper takes the first step to investigate whether ALLMs inadvertently leak user privacy solely through acoustic voiceprints and introduces HearSay , a comprehensive benchmark constructed from over 22,000 real-world audio clips. To ensure data quality, the benchmark is meticulously curated through a rigorous pipeline involving automated profiling and human verification, guaranteeing that all privacy labels are grounded in factual records. Extensive experiments on HearSay yield three critical findings: Significant Privacy Leakage : ALLMs inherently extract private attributes from voiceprints, reaching 92.89% accuracy on gender and effectively profiling social attributes. Insufficient Safety Mechanisms : Alarmingly, existing safeguards are severely inadequate; most models fail to refuse privacy-intruding requests, exhibiting near-zero refusal rates for physiological traits. Reasoning Amplifies Risk : Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning exacerbates privacy risks in capable models by uncovering deeper acoustic correlations.These findings expose critical vulnerabilities in ALLMs, underscoring the urgent need for targeted privacy alignment.The codes and dataset are available at https://github.com/JinWang79/HearSay_Benchmark

Abstract:
This paper introduces the Text-to-TrajVis task, which aims to transform natural language questions into trajectory data visualizations, facilitating the development of natural language interfaces for trajectory visualization systems. As this is a novel task, there is currently no relevant dataset available in the community. To address this gap, we first devised a new visualization language called Trajectory Visualization Language (TVL) to facilitate querying trajectory data and generating visualizations. Building on this foundation, we further proposed a dataset construction method that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with human efforts to create high-quality data. Specifically, we devised a four-stage pipeline that begins with candidate extraction, proceeds through seed TVL generation and tree-based expansion, and concludes with LLM-driven question creation followed by human validation. This process results in the creation of the first large-scale Text-to-TrajVis dataset, named TrajVL, which contains 9,608 (question, TVL) pairs. We propose a framework called TRCAT for progressively converting natural language questions into TVLs. The framework incorporates TVL-RAG Chain Module and Area-Time Standardization Module, significantly enhancing the accuracy of LLMs in TVL generation. Based on the TrajVL dataset, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of TRCAT’s performance across several mainstream LLMs (e.g., GPT, Qwen, LLaMA, and Gemma). Furthermore, we established a benchmarking system for this task, providing a foundation for future research in structured trajectory language generation.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in visual context compression enable MLLMs to process ultra-long contexts efficiently by rendering text into images. However, we identify a critical vulnerability inherent to this paradigm: lowering image resolution inadvertently catalyzes jailbreaking. Our experiments reveal that the safety defenses of SOTA models deteriorate sharply as resolution degrades, surprisingly persisting even when text remains legible. We attribute this to “Cognitive Overload“, hypothesizing that the effort required to decipher degraded inputs diverts attentional resources from safety auditing. This phenomenon is consistent across various visual perturbations, including noise and geometric distortion. To address this, we propose a simple “Structured Cognitive Offloading” strategy that mitigates these risks by enforcing a serialized pipeline to decouple visual transcription from safety assessment. Our work exposes a significant risk in vision-based compression and provides critical insights for the secure design of future MLLMs.

Abstract:
Leveraging the vast open-world knowledge and understanding capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to develop general-purpose, semantically-aware recommender systems has emerged as a pivotal research direction in generative recommendation. However, existing methods face bottlenecks in constructing item identifiers. Text-based methods introduce LLMs’ vast output space, leading to hallucination, while methods based on Semantic IDs (SIDs) encounter a semantic gap between SIDs and LLMs’ native vocabulary, requiring costly vocabulary expansion and alignment training. To address this, this paper introduces Term IDs (TIDs), defined as a set of semantically rich and standardized textual keywords, to serve as robust item identifiers. We propose GRAM, a novel framework centered on TIDs, employs Context-aware Term Generation to convert item’s metadata into standardized TIDs and utilizes Integrative Instruction Fine-tuning to collaboratively optimize term internalization and sequential recommendation. Additionally, Elastic Identifier Grounding is designed for robust item mapping. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that GRAM significantly outperforms baselines across multiple scenarios, pointing a promising direction for generalizable and high-performance generative recommendation systems.

Abstract:
Scene Graph Generation (SGG) structures visual scenes as graphs of objects and their relations. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced end-to-end SGG, current methods are hindered by both a lack of task-specific structured reasoning and the challenges of sparse, long-tailed relation distributions, resulting in incomplete scene graphs characterized by low recall and biased predictions. To address these issues, we introduce SGG-R 3 , a structured reasoning framework that integrates task-specific Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-guided supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) with group sequence policy optimization (GSPO), designed to engage in three sequential stages to achieve end-to-end unbiased scene graph generation. During the SFT phase, we propose a relation augmentation strategy by leveraging an MLLM and refined via embedding similarity filtering to alleviate relation sparsity. Subsequently, a stage-aligned reward scheme optimizes the procedural reasoning during RL. Specifically, we propose a novel dual-granularity reward which integrates fine-grained and coarse-grained relation rewards, simultaneously mitigating the long-tail issue via frequency-based adaptive weighting of predicates and improving relation coverage through semantic clustering. Experiments on two benchmarks show that SGG-R 3 achieves superior performance compared to existing methods, demonstrating the effectiveness and generalization of the framework.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across diverse natural language processing tasks. However, their performance often hinges on carefully designed prompts, whose creation requires substantial human effort. While numerous automatic prompt optimization techniques have been proposed, existing methods typically apply the same prompt across all samples within a dataset, ignoring variation in sample difficulty. To address these limitations, we propose HIPO, a HIerarchical Prompt Optimization framework that shifts the paradigm from dataset-level to sample-level optimization. Our framework first employs a lightweight router model, trained offline, to predict the difficulty of each sample at test time. Based on this prediction, HIPO dynamically selects a prompt from a five-tiered hierarchy, tailoring complexity to sample difficulty. Furthermore, two refinement stages—Task Description Prompt Refine and Attribution-Based Prompt Refine—enhance generalizability and fine-grained optimization. Extensive experiments on 27 tasks demonstrate that HIPO outperforms all baselines, achieving state-of-the-art performance on 25% more tasks than the strongest baseline. Cost analysis further demonstrates substantial efficiency gains, reducing API calls, token consumption, and overall cost by 1.2× to 80×. Our implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/LuQiCode/HIPO.

Abstract:
Intellectual Property (IP) is a highly specialized domain that integrates technical and legal knowledge, making it inherently complex and knowledge-intensive. Recent advancements in LLMs have demonstrated their potential to handle IP tasks, enabling more efficient analysis, understanding, and generation of IP-related content. However, existing datasets and benchmarks focus narrowly on patents or cover limited aspects of the IP field, lacking alignment with real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce IPBench, the first comprehensive IP task taxonomy and a large-scale bilingual benchmark encompassing 8 IP mechanisms and 20 distinct tasks, designed to evaluate LLMs in real-world IP practice. We benchmark 19 main LLMs, ranging from general purpose to domain-specific, including chat-oriented and reasoning-focused models, under zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought settings. Our results show that even the top-performing model, DeepSeek-V3, achieves only 75.8% accuracy, indicating significant room for improvement. Notably, open-source IP and law-oriented models lag behind closed-source general-purpose models. To foster future research, we publicly release IPBench, and will expand it with additional tasks to better reflect real-world complexities and support model advancements in the IP domain. We provide the data, code in the supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated competitive performance in zero-shot multilingual machine translation (MT). Some follow-up works further improved MT performance via preference optimization, but they leave a key aspect largely underexplored: the order in which data samples are given during training. We address this topic by integrating curriculum learning into various state-of-the-art preference optimization algorithms to boost MT performance. We introduce a novel curriculum learning strategy with restarts (CLewR), which reiterates easy-to-hard curriculum multiple times during training to effectively mitigate the catastrophic forgetting of easy examples. We demonstrate consistent gains across several model families (Gemma2, Qwen2.5, Llama3.1) and preference optimization techniques. We publicly release our code at https://github.com/alexandra-dragomir/CLewR.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) where agents interact through natural language to solve complex tasks or simulate multi-party dialogues. Recent work on LLM-based MASs has mainly focused on architecture design, such as role assignment and workflow orchestration. In contrast, this paper targets the interaction process itself, aiming to improve agents’ communication efficiency by helping them convey their intended meaning more effectively through language. To this end, we propose LinguaGame, a linguistically-grounded game-theoretic paradigm for multi-agent dialogue generation. Our approach models dialogue as a signalling game over communicative intents and strategies, solved with a training-free equilibrium approximation algorithm for inference-time decision adjustment. Unlike prior game-theoretic MASs, whose game designs are often tightly coupled with task-specific objectives, our framework relies on linguistically informed reasoning with minimal task-specific coupling. Specifically, it treats dialogue as intentional and strategic communication, requiring agents to infer what others aim to achieve (intents) and how they pursue those goals (strategies). We evaluate our framework in simulated courtroom proceedings and debates, with human expert assessments showing significant gains in communication efficiency. We release our code and data on GitHub.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising avenues for automated cognitive restructuring in mental health settings, current approaches predominantly focus on superficial positive reframing and lack the adaptability to balance conflicting therapeutic dimensions, such as empathy and rationality. To address these deficiencies, we propose CARE-CR, a context-aware framework that implements a decoupled optimization paradigm. We first train expert policies specialized for distinct therapeutic attributes rather than relying on a monolithic alignment strategy. To mitigate expert data scarcity, we introduce Dimension-Guided Hierarchical Monte Carlo Tree Search (DG-HMCTS) for data-efficient preference augmentation. At inference, a context-aware routing module dynamically predicts optimal preference weights to fuse expert outputs based on the user’s specific distress context. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CARE-CR achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines across multiple evaluation dimensions, including diagnostic accuracy, contextual appropriateness, task effectiveness, and overall helpfulness, while enabling controllable cognitive restructuring generation. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://github.com/HongzhiQ/CARE-CR.

Abstract:
Long-form audio meeting understanding (LAMU) is gaining attention, but dedicated question answering (QA) datasets are lacking. Previous tailored speech QA and existing Speech LLMs suffer from acoustic information loss and poor long-term dependency capture. We construct the LongAudioQA dataset and propose the GRGA model, which models heterogeneous audio features into a multi-dimensional graph and leverages agent planning for retrieval and answer generation, effectively addressing existing limitations.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) substantially extends the knowledge boundary of large language models. However, it still faces two major challenges when handling complex reasoning tasks: low context utilization and frequent hallucinations. To address these issues, we propose Self-Correcting RAG, a unified framework that reformulates retrieval and generation as constrained optimization and path planning. On the input side, we move beyond traditional greedy retrieval and, for the first time, formalize context selection as a multi-dimensional multiple-choice knapsack problem (MMKP), thereby maximizing information density and removing redundancy under a strict token budget. On the output side, we introduce a natural language inference (NLI)-guided Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) mechanism, which leverages test-time compute to dynamically explore reasoning trajectories and validate the faithfulness of generated answers. Experiments on six open-domain and multi-hop QA datasets demonstrate that our method significantly improves reasoning accuracy on complex queries while effectively reducing hallucinations, outperforming strong existing baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/xjiacs/Self-Correcting-RAG .

Abstract:
Climate research is pivotal for mitigating global environmental crises, yet the accelerating volume of multi-scale datasets and the complexity of analytical tools have created significant bottlenecks, constraining scientific discovery to fragmented and labor-intensive workflows. While the emergence Large Language Models (LLMs) offers a transformative paradigm to scale scientific expertise, existing explorations remain largely confined to simple Question-Answering (Q A) tasks. These approaches often oversimplify real-world challenges, neglecting the intricate physical constraints and the data-driven nature required in professional climate science. To bridge this gap, we introduce ClimAgent, a general-purpose autonomous framework designed to execute a wide spectrum of research tasks across diverse climate sub-fields. By integrating a unified tool-use environment with rigorous reasoning protocols, ClimAgent transcends simple retrieval to perform end-to-end modeling and analysis. To foster systematic evaluation, we propose ClimaBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for real-world climate discovery. It encompasses challenging problems spanning 5 distinct task categories derived from professional scenarios between 2000 and 2025. Experiments on ClimaBench demonstrate that ClimAgent significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 40.21% improvement over original LLM solutions in solution rigorousness and practicality. Our code are available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/ClimAgent.

Abstract:
While LLMs enable personalized chatbots, their effectiveness in child-centered personalization remains unclear, as systematic evaluation of child-specific preferences is still lacking. To address this gap, we introduce ChildEval, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ ability to infer and follow child-centered preferences in long-context conversations. ChildEval contains 29K synthesized persona profiles of children aged 3–6, providing relatively static background information. Each persona is associated with a child preference—which may align with, conflict with, or be independent of the persona—expressed either explicitly in a single sentence or implicitly through 6–10 turn dialogues. Explicit and implicit preferences are designed to reflect the same underlying preference but differ in expression, capturing dynamic aspects of preference expression rather than changes in the static persona. The benchmark spans five top-level and fourteen sub-level categories covering children’s daily lives and development. We further propose fine-grained, child-centric evaluation protocols to systematically assess open-source LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate how different personalized representations affect LLM responses and suggest that finetuning on ChildEval can enhance child-centered performance. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/ziyanluo/ChildEval.

Abstract:
Addressing the escalating security vulnerabilities in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, this study investigates backdoor attacks targeting the visual pathway. We identify a core obstacle causing the failure of traditional attack paradigms: "Gradient Interference." This phenomenon represents an optimization failure triggered by conflicting strategies during end-to-end training. To resolve this, we propose an Adaptive Threat-Aware Adversarial Tuning (ATAAT) framework. Through its core "Threat-Method Adaptive Mapping" mechanism, ATAAT intelligently selects the optimal gradient decoupling strategy based on the adversary’s capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ATAAT exhibits significant advantages, achieving a highly robust Targeted Attack Success Rate (TASR > 80%) while maintaining extreme stealthiness with merely a 5% poisoning rate. It efficiently handles complex semantic-level triggers and achieves implicit decoupled attacks in data poisoning scenarios for the first time. This work reveals a critical security vulnerability in VLAs and provides theoretical and methodological support for future defense architectures.

Abstract:
Safety-critical traffic reasoning requires contrastive consistency: models must detect true hazards when an accident occurs, and reliably reject plausible-but-false hypotheses under near-identical counterfactual scenes. We present CCTVBench, a Contrastive Consistency Traffic VideoQA Benchmark built on paired real accident videos and world-model-generated counterfactual counterparts, together with minimally different, mutually exclusive hypothesis questions. CCTVBench enforces a single structured decision pattern over each video question quadruple and provides actionable diagnostics that decompose failures into positive omission, positive swap, negative hallucination, and mutual-exclusivity violation, while separating video versus question consistency. Experiments across open-source and proprietary video LLMs reveal a large and persistent gap between standard per-instance QA metrics and quadruple-level contrastive consistency, with unreliable none-of-the-above rejection as a key bottleneck. Finally, we introduce C-TCD, which leverages the semantically exclusive counterpart video as the contrast input at inference time, improving both instance-level QA and contrastive consistency.

Abstract:
Generic sentences express generalizations that tolerate exceptions without explicitly communicating information about quantities. For example, the sentence Ravens are black is true even though there are albino ravens. The sentence doesn’t explicitly communicate the number or frequency of black ravens. Whether generics semantically encode information about quantities implicitly is controversial. This work takes a large-scale distributional approach to the semantic debate. It compares thousands of naturally occurring generics and quantificational sentences using language-model probabilities. It shows that language models recover many semantic facts about quantifiers. It also shows that they recover semantic facts about surface distributional differences between generics and their “quantificational counterparts”. Accordingly, and contrary to dominant views in other fields, we formulate an empirical argument to the effect that generics are not quantificational.

Abstract:
Text simplification plays a vital role in natural language processing, yet auto long text simplification remains challenging due to the difficulty in the joint balancing of simplification efficiency and fine-grained quality requirements, such as fluency, grammatical correctness and semantic completeness. To address these challenges, we propose Simplify-Pro, a two-level and progressive LLM-based framework that establishes an effective paradigm for automatic long text simplification under diverse test scenarios. By integrating paragraph-level training, simplification generation, metric-assisted analysis and selective refinement into a unified multi-stage pipeline, our framework achieves superior performance across in-domain and out-of-domain simplification tasks, which matches or even outperforms advanced and proprietary LLMs. Furthermore, comprehensive experiments and qualitative analyses cover the simplification performance, generalization ability and the contribution of each individual stage, demonstrating the effectiveness, robustness and modular design advantages of Simplify-Pro.

Abstract:
Scientific research involves complex information-seeking and reasoning workflows across heterogeneous sources. However, existing benchmarks primarily emphasize general-domain retrieval or static scientific question answering, and therefore fail to assess key capabilities required in realistic scientific research workflows. We introduce SciExplore, a benchmark designed to evaluate scientific information-seeking and reasoning capabilities of LLMs and agents. SciExplore comprises four task types covering 103 expert-curated tasks across more than ten scientific disciplines: scientific database navigation, ambiguous literature retrieval, missing reference completion, and cross-source structured knowledge synthesis, which probe progressively higher-level abilities from entity-level reasoning and document-level identification to evidence-level grounding and domain-level synthesis. We evaluate over ten state-of-the-art LLMs and autonomous agents on SciExplore, revealing substantial performance gaps with performance degrading sharply as task complexity increases and extremely low accuracy on the most challenging structured synthesis tasks. These results highlight significant limitations of current models and agents in realistic scientific information-seeking scenarios.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex multi-step reasoning, yet they still exhibit severe safety failures such as harmful content generation. Existing methods often apply coarse-grained constraints over the entire reasoning trajectories, which can undermine reasoning capability while failing to address the root causes of unsafe behavior. In this work, we uncover a previously underexplored failure mode in LRMs, termed Self-Jailbreak, where models initially recognize the harmful intent of a query, but override this judgment during subsequent reasoning steps, ultimately generating unsafe outputs. Such a phenomenon reveals that LRMs are capable of recognizing harm, while safety failures primarily arise from reasoning steps. Motivated by this finding, we propose Chain-of-Guardrail (CoG), a trajectory-level training framework that mitigates Self-Jailbreak via targeted, step-level interventions while maintaining reasoning ability. Experiments across multiple safety and reasoning benchmarks indicate that CoG achieves a favorable balance between safety and reasoning performance compared with existing approaches.

Abstract:
Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to jointly identify named entity mentions in text, predict their semantic types, and ground each entity to a corresponding visual region in an associated image. Existing approaches predominantly adopt pipeline-based architectures that decouple textual entity recognition and visual grounding, leading to error accumulation and suboptimal joint optimization. In this paper, we propose E2E-GMNER, a fully end-to-end generative framework that unifies entity recognition, semantic typing, visual grounding, and implicit knowledge reasoning within a single multimodal large language model. We formulate GMNER as an instruction-tuned conditional generation task and incorporate chain-of-thought reasoning to enable the model to adaptively determine when visual evidence or background knowledge is informative, reducing reliance on noisy cues. To further address the instability of generative bounding box prediction, we introduce Gaussian Risk-Aware Box Perturbation (GRBP), which replaces hard box supervision with probabilistically perturbed soft targets to improve robustness against annotation noise and discretization errors. Extensive experiments on the Twitter-GMNER and Twitter-FMNERG benchmarks demonstrate that E2E-GMNER achieves highly competitive performance compared with state of the art methods, validating the effectiveness of unified end-to-end optimization and noise-aware grounding supervision.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks by leveraging long Chain-of-Thought (CoT), but often suffer from overthinking, leading to excessive reasoning steps and high inference latency. Existing CoT compression methods struggle to balance accuracy and efficiency, and lack fine-grained, step-level adaptation to redundancy and reasoning bias. Therefore, we propose State-Aware Reasoning Compression with Knowledge Guidance (STACK), a framework that performs step-wise CoT compression by explicitly modeling stage-specific redundancy sources and integrating with a retrieval-augmented guidance. STACK constructs online long–short contrastive samples and dynamically switches between knowledge-guided compression for uncertain or biased reasoning state and self-prompted compression for overly long but confident state, complemented by an answer-convergence-based early stopping mechanism to suppress redundant verification. We further propose a reward-difference-driven training strategy by combining Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), enabling models to learn state-conditioned compression strategies. Experiments on three mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that STACK achieves a superior accuracy–efficiency balance, reducing average response length by 59.9% while improving accuracy by 4.8 points over existing methods.

Abstract:
Decoding language from the human brain remains a grand challenge for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs). Current approaches typically rely on unimodal brain representations, neglecting the brain’s inherently multimodal processing. Inspired by the brain’s associative mechanisms, where viewing an image can evoke related sounds and linguistic representations, we propose a unified framework that leverages Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to align brain signals with a shared semantic space encompassing text, images, and audio. A router module dynamically selects and fuses modality-specific brain features according to the characteristics of each stimulus. Experiments on various fMRI datasets with textual, visual, and auditory stimuli demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, achieving an 8.48% average improvement on the most commonly used benchmark. We further extend our framework to EEG and MEG data, demonstrating flexibility and robustness across varying temporal and spatial resolutions. To our knowledge, this is the first unified BCI architecture capable of robustly decoding multimodal brain activity across diverse brain signals and stimulus types, offering a flexible solution for real-world applications.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) typically come with a fixed architecture, despite growing evidence that not all layers contribute equally to every downstream task. We introduce TALE (Task-Aware Layer Elimination), an inference-time method that improves task performance by selectively removing layers that are irrelevant or detrimental for a given task. TALE optimizes task-specific performance, yielding a task-optimized architecture without retraining. Across 9 tasks and 5 model families, under both zero-shot and few-shot settings, TALE consistently matches or surpasses baseline performance while simultaneously reducing computational costs. TALE also synergizes with fine-tuning, leading to further performance improvements. Computing TALE for a new task requires modest resources, making it a practical and deployable solution for task-specialized LLM inference.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought reasoning has significantly enhanced the problem-solving capabilities of Large Language Models. Unfortunately, current models generate reasoning steps sequentially without foresight, often becoming trapped in suboptimal reasoning paths with redundant steps. In contrast, we introduce Neural Chain-of-Thought Search (NCoTS), a framework that reformulates reasoning as a dynamic search for the optimal thinking strategy. By quantitatively characterizing the solution space, we reveal the existence of sparse superior reasoning paths that are simultaneously more accurate and concise than standard outputs. Our method actively navigates towards these paths by evaluating candidate reasoning operators using a dual-factor heuristic that optimizes for both correctness and computational cost. Consequently, NCoTS achieves a Pareto improvement across diverse reasoning benchmarks, boosting accuracy by over 3.5% while reducing generation length by over 22%. We will make our code and data publicly available.

Abstract:
Understanding multimodal user personas in long-term dialogues is essential for building personalized and human-like dialogue systems. However, existing datasets suffer from limited persona diversity and static, overly simplified settings, making them insufficient for capturing the complexity of real-world interactions. To address these limitations, we introduce LongMP-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities of models in understanding evolving user personas within long-term multimodal dialogues. We present a multi-step, scalable data construction pipeline that generates long-term interaction records centered around multimodal personas, followed by human refinement for quality assurance. The resulting dataset contains long conversations from 150 users, each exhibiting visual consistency and dynamic persona development over time. Built on this dataset, we define a suite of tasks to comprehensively assess models’ ability to track persona evolution, integrate visual and textual inputs, and apply persona understanding in realistic dialogue scenarios. Extensive experiments on LongMP-Bench highlight the substantial challenges in multimodal persona understanding, especially in tracking persona shifts and leveraging multimodal context effectively. We will release our benchmark and code to facilitate future research in multimodal and personalized dialogue systems.

Abstract:
Cross-lingual transfer in NLP is often hindered by the "script barrier" where differences in writing systems inhibit transfer learning between languages. Transliteration, the process of converting the script, has emerged as a powerful technique to bridge this gap by increasing lexical overlap. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the application of transliteration in cross-lingual NLP. We present a taxonomy of key motivations to utilize transliterations in language models, and also provide an overview of different approaches of incorporating transliterations as input. We analyze the evolution and effectiveness of these methods, discussing the critical trade-offs involved, and contextualize their need in modern LLMs. The review explores various contexts how transliteration is beneficial, including handling code-mixed text, leveraging language family relatedness, and pragmatic gains in inference efficiency. Based on this analysis, we provide concrete recommendations for researchers on selecting and implementing the most appropriate transliteration strategy based on their specific language, task, and resource constraints.

Abstract:
The emergence of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that integrate vision and language modalities has unlocked new potentials for scientific reasoning, outperforming prior benchmarks in both natural language and coding domains. Current materials science evaluation datasets such as MaScQA and SciQA remain largely text-based and fail to capture the visual and research-level analytic complexity required in materials discovery and design. We introduce MatVQA, a scalable benchmark specifically designed to address this gap. Generated via an automated pipeline, MArxivAgent, from recent materials literature, MatVQA features 1672 questions across four critical structure-property-performance (SPP) reasoning tasks. Uniquely, MatVQA employs an iterative process to eliminate textual shortcuts, compelling MLLMs to perform fine-grained, low-level visual analysis of material imagery (e.g., microscopy, diffraction patterns) integrated with multi-step scientific reasoning. Benchmarking 19 open- and closed-source MLLMs on MatVQA reveals substantial gaps in current multimodal reasoning capabilities. The MatVQA benchmark is publicly available[] to facilitate further research on applying MLLMs to complex materials science problems.

Abstract:
High-quality annotated data is crucial for NLP, yet manual annotation is costly and difficult to scale in low-resource settings. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong zero-shot and few-shot generalization in NLP tasks, but existing annotation tools either lack LLM support or use LLMs only as one-off pre-annotation engines, without incorporating collaboration or quality control, compromising data reliability. We present BNLP, a text annotation platform that embeds LLM-assisted labeling into a quality-aware collaborative workflow. BNLP treats LLM outputs as intermediate, revisable states and integrates multi-role collaboration, iterative review cycles, and consistency analysis to enable continuous quality monitoring while preserving efficiency gains. BNLP also natively supports AI-ready formats such as Excel and JSON, ensuring seamless data flow from manual annotation to model training. Experiments show that BNLP reduces annotation time by 74.3% and improves annotation quality by 11.6% over purely manual annotation in LLM-assisted settings.

Abstract:
In Document-level Relation Extraction (DocRE), relational facts are typically organized around a few salient entities. Explicitly capturing this topological structure is pivotal to addressing the two critical bottlenecks of the task: the extreme class imbalance and the complexity of multi-hop reasoning. Based on this insight, we first introduce the concept of the salient entity and propose a novel approach that decouples the extraction space into dense and sparse scenarios. Specifically, our approach restricts the search space for dense pairs to mitigate the dominance of the negative samples, and innovatively injects the rich semantic knowledge of salient entities to explicitly reconstruct the document for bridging disjoint evidence in multi-hop reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach yields consistent improvements over various backbone models and achieves advanced performance compared to existing enhancement methods.

Abstract:
Large language models are increasingly used to draft long-form multimodal documents, but their end-to-end performance on professional report generation remains systematically understudied. We introduce AnalystBench, a continually extensible benchmark of 20 real-world report generation tasks grounded in multimodal document collections, where models must process millions of input tokens to produce long-form professional reports. Using expert-validated quality checklists and groundedness evaluation, we evaluate LLMs and coding agents and find that the best model, GPT-5.1, scores highly on executive summarization tasks (exceeding 90% on quality checklists) but degrades substantially on tasks requiring long-horizon synthesis over large inputs (dropping to 25-40%). Agent-based generation substantially benefits strong closed-source models such as GPT-5.1, with checklist scores improving by 20.24 percentage points and visual coverage by 37.41 points over vanilla generation, but offers little or negative gains for open-source models like DeepSeek-R1 (-3.02 points). Expert reviewers note that while generated reports are grounded and clearly separate factual description from interpretation, they often fall short in actionability, clarity, and quantitative precision, which highlights the gap between system performance and real-world professional needs.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based mobile agents have made significant performance advancements. However, these agents often follow explicit user instructions while overlooking personalized needs, leading to significant limitations for real users, particularly without personalized context: (1) inability to interpret ambiguous instructions, (2) lack of learning from user interaction history, and (3) failure to handle personalized instructions. To alleviate the above challenges, we propose Me-Agent, a learnable and memorable personalized mobile agent. Specifically, Me-Agent incorporates a two-level user habit learning approach. At the prompt level, we design a user preference learning strategy enhanced with a Personal Reward Model to improve personalization performance. At the memory level, we design a Hierarchical Preference Memory, which stores users’ long-term memory and app-specific memory in different level memory. To validate the personalization capabilities of mobile agents, we introduce User FingerTip, a new benchmark featuring numerous ambiguous instructions for daily life. Extensive experiments on User FingerTip and general benchmarks demonstrate that Me-Agent achieves state-of-the-art performance in personalization while maintaining competitive instruction execution performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved striking successes on many benchmarks, yet recent studies continue to expose fundamental weaknesses. In this paper, we introduce Concept, a simple word-guessing board game, as a benchmark for probing abductive reasoning. Our results show that this game, easily solved by humans (with a success rate of over 90%), is still very challenging for state-of-the-art LLMs (no model exceeds 40% success rate). Specifically, we observe that LLMs struggle with interpreting other players’ strategic intents, and with correcting initial hypotheses given sequential information updates. In addition, we extend the evaluation across multiple languages, and find that the LLM performance drops further in lower-resource languages (Dutch, French, and Spanish) compared to English.

Abstract:
The rapid spread of fake news on digital platforms presents significant societal challenges, demanding detection methods capable of addressing intricate manipulation strategies. Existing methods predominantly rely on monolithic verification approaches, which fail to decompose the complex blend of factual inaccuracies, logical fallacies, and propaganda techniques in modern misinformation. To address this gap, we propose PARD, a Protocol-Adaptive Role-Specific multi-agent framework that decomposes verification into factual, logical, and contextual dimensions. PARD dynamically selects the optimal interaction protocol from a library that includes Round-Robin Discussion, Point-Counterpoint Dialogue, and Cross-Examination to tailor the reasoning process for more effective detection. We evaluate PARD with LIAR-RAW+, an extended version of the LIAR-RAW dataset enriched with fine-grained factual, logical, and contextual annotations. Experimental results demonstrate that PARD consistently outperforms baseline methods in both predictive accuracy and explanatory quality, supported by its efficient dynamic governance mechanism

Abstract:
Autonomous GUI agents are inherently vulnerable to Environmental Injection Attacks (EIAs). However, existing red-teaming methods face a trade-off between requiring target-specific knowledge and incurring prohibitive computational costs. More fundamentally, a key question remains: what factors determine attack success? To answer this, we first analyze two dimensions: visual appearance (e.g., position, size, color) and semantic content. We find that semantic content dominates, while visual variations have negligible impact. Leveraging this insight, we introduce EVA, a framework that evolves payloads exclusively on the semantic dimension via a discovery-deployment pipeline. Experiments demonstrate that EVA significantly outperforms baselines, achieving 59% to 85% average Attack Success Rate (ASR) while evolving benign seeds into successful attacks within 1.18 to 1.71 iterations. This rapid convergence suggests a dense semantic attack space within the model’s latent space. Whenever an input falls into this space, the agent becomes inherently vulnerable, exposing a fundamental alignment flaw in current multimodal representations.

Abstract:
Alignment of large language models (LLMs) typically relies on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), or more recently direct preference optimization (DPO). However, existing objectives largely ignore the global geometry and topology of the representation space: they operate on local token-level likelihoods or scalar preference scores, and do not explicitly constrain how hidden states move from a user prompt to an answer.We view generation as tracing a semantic trajectory in hidden space, and propose a topology-enhanced alignment framework that regularizes these trajectories using 0-dimensional persistent homology. First, at the SFT stage, we introduce a Trajectory Topology Loss (TTL). For each batch, we treat mean-pooled embeddings of prompts and gold answers as a mixed point cloud, run a Union-Find-based 0D persistent homology algorithm, and extract ”prompt–answer bridge” edges that connect previously disconnected components. TTL encourages the model’s actual update direction from prompt to answer to align with these topologically derived bridges, rather than with arbitrary or per-example directions.Second, at the RLHF/DPO stage, we propose Topological Preference Optimization (TPO). TPO constructs topic-specific semantic preference vectors from an offline pipeline and aligns the semantic improvement direction between rejected and chosen responses with these vectors in an intermediate hidden layer. We further introduce an exponential-moving-average-based dynamic weighting scheme to balance DPO and TPO losses, and also explore a fully topological variant that applies persistent homology on the chosen/rejected embedding cloud.We instantiate our methods on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and evaluate on UltraChat and Anthropic HH-RLHF. Across both SFT and DPO training, topology-enhanced objectives consistently outperform strong non-topological baselines (including per-example, nearest-neighbor, and random direction regularizers) on automatic preference metrics and LLM-judge evaluations, while maintaining or slightly improving toxicity. These results suggest that incorporating persistent homology and trajectory geometry is a promising and practical direction for more controllable LLM alignment.

Abstract:
Visual Document Retrieval (VDR), which aims to retrieve relevant pages within vast corpora of visually-rich documents, is of significance in current multimodal retrieval applications. The state-of-the-art multi-vector paradigm excels in performance but suffers from prohibitive overhead, a problem that current efficiency methods like pruning and merging address imperfectly, creating a difficult trade-off between compression rate and feature fidelity. To overcome this dilemma, we introduce Prune-then-Merge, a novel two-stage framework that synergizes these complementary approaches. Our method first employs an adaptive pruning stage to filter out low-information patches, creating a refined, high-signal set of embeddings. Subsequently, a hierarchical merging stage compresses this pre-filtered set, effectively summarizing semantic content without the noise-induced feature dilution seen in single-stage methods. Extensive experiments on 29 VDR datasets demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms existing methods, significantly extending the near-lossless compression range and providing robust performance at high compression ratios.

Abstract:
Understanding the intricate interplay among sequence, structure, and function remains a fundamental challenge in proteomics. The sequence-structure-function paradigm posits that biological roles are governed by the tertiary geometric conformations encoded within primary sequences; consequently, integrating these multi-modal descriptors is imperative for accurate functional annotation. While protein language models (pLMs) have achieved significant progress via representation learning on massive sequence data, they often lack the capacity to incorporate high-resolution structural information and the rich textual context that characterizes protein roles. In this work, we present STELLA, a multimodal LLM that synergistically aligns bimodal (sequence-structure) representations with the textual modality to advance protein functional annotation. By leveraging ESM3 for unified bimodal encoding and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct for natural language modeling, STELLA achieves state-of-the-art performance in two critical tasks: Functional Description Prediction and Enzyme-catalyzed Reaction Prediction. This study demonstrates that multimodal LLMs represent a paradigm shift beyond pure pLMs, offering a new frontier for protein biology and biomedical discovery. The codes can be accessed via https://github.com/ocx-lab/STELLA.

Abstract:
Tool-use large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed to support sensitive workflows, relying on tool calls for retrieval, external API access, and session memory management. While prior research has examined various threats, the risk of systematic data exfiltration by backdoored agents remains underexplored. In this work, we present a backdoor attack framework that embeds semantic triggers into fine-tuned LLM agents. When triggered, the backdoored agent invokes memory-access tool calls to retrieve stored user context and exfiltrates it via disguised retrieval tool calls. We further demonstrate that multi-turn interaction amplifies the impact of data exfiltration, as attacker-controlled retrieval responses can subtly steer subsequent agent behavior and user interactions, enabling sustained and cumulative information leakage over time. Our experimental results expose a critical vulnerability in LLM agents with tool access and highlight the need for defenses against exfiltration-oriented backdoors.

Abstract:
Multi-agent systems powered by large language models have achieved strong performance on complex tasks, yet naive collaboration topologies often cause high communication costs and redundant context. Existing methods usually use a fixed communication graph and manage collaboration structure and shared memory in separate modules. Our log analysis of several representative systems shows that this separation leads to multiple copies of the same key facts in dialogue, memory and model inputs. We address this issue with EvoHyper, a framework based on an evolving hypergraph topology for multi-agent collaboration. In EvoHyper, a single hypergraph represents agents and shared memory, and each hyperedge serves as a collaboration unit that binds a group of agents to that shared memory. During execution a controller edits the hypergraph through a small set of predefined evolution operations, so collaboration units can spawn, update and merge as tasks unfold. Experiments on four benchmarks covering mathematical reasoning and code generation show that EvoHyper is (I) high-performing, achieving 3.2% to 7.8% accuracy gains over state-of-the-art methods, (II) efficient, reducing token consumption by up to 23.5%, and (III) adaptive, adjusting topology complexity according to task requirements.

Abstract:
We introduce Comic Visual Question Answering ( ComicVQA ), a comics-based benchmark for evaluating MLLMs on visual reasoning. ComicVQA comprises of (i) Missing Panel Prediction , testing fine-grained visual grounding and (ii) Panel Sorting , which evaluates sequential narrative understanding. Proprietary models achieve up to 62.6% on Missing Panel Prediction and 46.4% on Panel Sorting, whereas open-source models reach only 47.7% and 26.9%, respectively. In contrast, human annotators achieve over 83% accuracy on both tasks, revealing a large gap between current models and human-level multimodal understanding in comics. Through controlled ordering ablations and a detailed error taxonomy, we show that current MLLMs rely primarily on coarse temporal cues and struggle with fine-grained visual reasoning. These findings demonstrate ComicVQA as a diagnostic benchmark for advancing multimodal visual reasoning in comics.

Abstract:
The proliferation of short video fake news threatens social stability. Current detection methods rely either on black-box Multimodal Small Language Models (MSLMs), which suffer from poor explainability and superficial understanding, or on specific prompt strategies for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that underutilize their reasoning capabilities and knowledge. To address these challenges, we propose a novel multi-agent framework named CSI for short video fake news detection. CSI implements two key units: 1) Multimodal Forensics Unit (MFU), which performs synchronous multimodal deconstruction and external knowledge retrieval to collect comprehensive evidence. 2) Case Review Unit (CRU), which first employs collaborative discussion to facilitate viewpoint interaction to obtain the review result. Subsequently, the Adjudicator integrates evidence and the review result via multiple attention mechanisms to interact with the news, ensuring a robust verdict.Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that CSI provides rigorous explanations while achieving state-of-the-art performance. Our code is available at: https://github.com/VFCenter/CSI.

Abstract:
LLMs demonstrate strong performance on code benchmarks, yet round-trip code execution reveals limitations in their ability to maintain consistent reasoning across forward and backward execution. We present RoundTripCodeEval (RTCE), a comprehensive benchmark consisting of four distinct code execution reasoning tasks designed to rigorously test round-trip consistency. RTCE provides an execution-free, exact-match evaluation of bijection fidelity, assessing whether models preserve a consistent one-to-one mapping between encoding and decoding operations across various algorithms and directions. We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art Code-LLMs using zero-shot prompting, supervised fine-tuning on execution traces, and self-reflection mechanisms. Each yields modest improvements, but none closes the gap, indicating that current LLMs struggle with true round-trip consistency, which demonstrates that they lack the internal coherence required for trustworthy code reasoning. RTCE surfaces several new and previously unmeasured insights that are not captured by existing I/O-prediction, execution-reasoning, or round-trip natural-language benchmarks.

Abstract:
ASR errors are typically analysed at the phoneme level, treating phonemes as atomic symbols. In this work, we instead adopt a featural representation of phonemes, grounded in phonological theory, which models speech sounds as structured bundles of distinctive articulatory and acoustic properties. This perspective allows us to analyse recognition errors at a finer granularity and to investigate whether certain phonological features are more vulnerable than others. Across multiple languages, we show that phoneme confusions are strongly structured in phonological feature space: errors are predominantly local and exhibit systematic asymmetries that reveal a small set of weakly modelled features. These findings have direct implications both for the design and diagnosis of ASR systems and for cognitive models of human speech perception, where similar feature-level asymmetries have long been observed.

Abstract:
Long-form audio understanding poses significant challenges for large audio language models (LALMs) due to the extreme length of audio sequences and the need to reason over heterogeneous acoustic cues distributed over time, such as speech content, speaker identity, emotion, and sound events. To address these challenges, we propose PlanRAG-Audio, a planning-based retrieval-augmented generation framework for scalable long-form audio understanding. Rather than having audio LALMs process entire recordings directly, PlanRAG-Audio explicitly plans which modalities and temporal spans are required for a given query, and retrieves only query-relevant information from a structured text and audio database. This retrieval planning enables effective reasoning over complex, cross-domain audio queries while substantially reducing the input length passed to the large language models. Experiments across a wide range of speech/audio retrieval demonstrate that PlanRAG-Audio improves reasoning accuracy and stabilizes performance as audio duration increases by decoupling inference cost from raw audio length.

Abstract:
An AI system for professional floor plan design must precisely control room dimensions and areas while respecting the desired connectivity between rooms and maintaining functional and aesthetic quality.Existing generative approaches focus primarily on respecting the requested connectivity between rooms, but do not support generating floor plans that respect numerical constraints. We introduce a text-based floor plan generation approach that fine-tunes a large language model (LLM) on real plans and then applies reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to improve adherence to topological and numerical constraints while discouraging invalid or overlapping outputs.Furthermore, we design a set of constraint adherence metrics to systematically measure how generated floor plans align with user-defined constraints.Our model generates floor plans that satisfy user-defined connectivity and numerical constraints and outperforms existing methods on Realism, Compatibility, and Diversity metrics. Across all tasks, our approach achieves at least a 94% relative reduction in Compatibility compared with existing methods.Our results demonstrate that LLMs can effectively handle constraints in this setting, suggesting broader applications for text-based generative modeling.

Abstract:
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods such as LoRA reduce trainable parameters, but still apply dense low-rank updates per token, leaving adaptation compute largely fixed once rank is set. We propose Context-Conditioned Masked LoRA (CCM-LoRA), which learns a lightweight router that activates an input-dependent subset of LoRA rank directions, turning LoRA into dynamic rank routing and enabling contextual sparsity in fine-tuning and inference. CCM-LoRA is trained with a budget-constrained objective that targets an expected effective rank (or FLOPs) while regularizing routing to avoid degenerate always-on/off masks. Across public NLU and multilingual benchmarks, CCM-LoRA improves the accuracy–efficiency Pareto frontier versus static-rank LoRA and adaptive-rank baselines, matching or improving task performance at lower inference-time effective rank. We also provide a reproducible profiling protocol and analyses of rank usage, router overhead, and robustness under domain and language shift.

Abstract:
The transition to end-to-end Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has positioned these architectures as active social evaluators in high-stakes domains. However, it remains unclear whether these models maintain objective auditory perception or succumb to the "Hearing with Eyes" phenomenon, where visual racial cues distort linguistic proficiency evaluations. We investigate this cross-modal bias by constructing a controlled counterfactual dataset utilizing a Visual Matched-Guise Paradigm. By pairing identical native audio with diverse visual personas across English and Korean contexts, we reveal a distinct Cultural Asymmetry in model behavior. In Anglophone settings, most closed models exhibit Reverse Linguistic Stereotyping, hallucinating non-native accents for Asian speakers despite standard native audio. Conversely, in Korean settings, the same models assign baseline-relative competence premiums across all visual personas, with the largest gains for out-group (White/Black) speakers, consistent with Expectancy Violation Theory. Our findings demonstrate that MLLMs do not merely process sensory inputs but actively reproduce context-dependent sociolinguistic ideologies.

Abstract:
Tool-integrated reasoning (TIR) enables large language models (LLMs) to invoke external tools for tasks beyond their internal capacity but often suffers from tool overuse.Existing approaches leverage imitation learning or reward shaping to improve efficiency, yet mainly target single-tool scenarios and ignore the varying invocation costs across tools in multi-tool reasoning (MTIR). To address these gaps, we propose EMTIR-GRPO, a simple yet effective RL algorithm for cost-aware MTIR. Built upon GRPO, we introduce a composite reward considering format completeness, answer correctness, and tool efficiency.By incorporating a cost-aware coefficient with group optimal cost estimation, EMTIR-GRPO explicitly models heterogeneous tool costs and encourages more cost-effective tool-use strategies. Experiments on MTIR-QA and MTIR-TC demonstrate significant efficiency gains (e.g., 𝛥 +10.9 on Tool-Star-7B and 𝛥 +3.6 on ReCall-7B) while maintaining or even improving accuracy (e.g., 55.4 vs. 52.0 on Tool-Star-7B). Additional budget-constrained and tool-free evaluations further validate its effectiveness in maximizing cost-efficiency and reducing cognitive offloading.

Abstract:
Automated code generation remains a persistent challenge in software engineering, as conventional multi-agent frameworks are often constrained by static planning, isolated execution, high computational overhead, and limited adaptability to complex tasks. This paper introduces CollabCoder, a novel Plan-Code Co-Evolution framework that improves code generation through dynamic multi-agent collaboration. The core idea is to design a collaborative decision-making process between the plan module and the code module to decide which module should be executed for the debugging process. Extensive experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that CollabCoder consistently improves code quality and robustness across tasks. Importantly, CollabCoder achieves performance comparable to or exceeding current state-of-the-art methods while reducing computational overhead, with efficiency gains becoming more pronounced as benchmark difficulty increases. On the more challenging LiveCodeBench and xCodeEval benchmarks, our approach improves performance by 11-20% over strong baselines while reducing the number of API calls by an average of 4-10 per execution.

Abstract:
Agentic search requires large language models (LLMs) to perform multi-step search to solve complex information-seeking tasks, imposing unique challenges on their reasoning capabilities. However, what constitutes effective reasoning for agentic search and how it can be learned remains unclear. In this work, we first investigate the reasoning behaviors that enable success in agentic search. By comparing successful and failed trajectories via an LLM-based analysis pipeline, we identify four beneficial behaviors: Information Verification, Authority Evaluation, Adaptive Search, and Error Recovery. Building on this, we propose Behavior Priming, a training approach that equips agentic search models with these reasoning behaviors before reinforcement learning (RL). Specifically, it collects trajectories with the identified behaviors for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and then applies standard RL to further improve task performance. Experiments on Qwen3-1.7B and Llama3.2-3B-Instruct show that Behavior Priming yields relative improvements over direct RL by 37.2% on three web benchmarks and 6.2% on seven multi-hop QA benchmarks, and outperforms the SFT-then-RL baseline using outcome-correct trajectories for fine-tuning. Crucially, we show that these reasoning behaviors matter more than outcome correctness in the priming stage prior to RL. Further analysis reveals that Behavior Priming enhances exploration (pass@8) and test-time scaling (search step number), providing a robust foundation for RL.

Abstract:
Code edit suggestion, which encompasses modifying, refactoring, and maintaining existing code, represents the most frequent software development activity and has become a focal point for AI-powered tools. Traditional methods translate explicit natural language instructions into code edits, while pattern-based approaches learn from users’ historical editing patterns to provide style-consistent and more accurate suggestions. However, these pattern-based methods still face two critical challenges: (1) difficulty handling edits that demand deep contextual reasoning, and (2) lack of interpretability in editing decisions. To tackle this, we propose CoT-Edit, a reinforcement learning framework that guides LLMs to discover chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning paths for code editing without requiring human-annotated CoT data. Specifically, we design multi-step reasoning framework that enable: (1) analysis-guided code editing, and (2) seamless switching between CoT and non-CoT inference modes. Building on this, we introduce Edit-Aware Reward Modeling (EARM), a fine-grained diff-based reward approach for effective learning. Furthermore, we discover a LoRA merging strategy that enhances model generalization. Evaluations on an industrial dataset show that our approach achieves 60.2% edit accuracy, outperforming all strong baselines. Online A/B tests further confirm its effectiveness in production. Code is available at https://github.com/202230483077yyh/CoT-Edit.

Abstract:
Recent studies reveal that large language models (LLMs) exhibit limited logical reasoning abilities in mathematical problem-solving, instead often relying on pattern-matching and memorization. We systematically analyze this limitation, focusing on logical relationship understanding, which is a core capability underlying genuine logical reasoning, and reveal that errors related to this capability account for over 90% of incorrect predictions, with Chain-of-Thought Supervised Fine-Tuning (CoT-SFT) failing to substantially reduce these errors. To address this bottleneck, we propose First-Step Logical Reasoning (FSLR), a lightweight training framework targeting logical relationship understanding. Our key insight is that the first planning step-identifying which variables to use and which operation to apply-encourages the model to derive logical relationships directly from the problem statement. By training models on this isolated step, FSLR provides explicit supervision for logical relationship understanding, unlike CoT-SFT which implicitly embeds such relationships within complete solution trajectories. Extensive experiments across multiple models and datasets demonstrate that FSLR consistently outperforms CoT-SFT under both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings, with average improvements of 3.2% and 4.6%, respectively. Moreover, FSLR achieves 4-6× faster training and reduces training token consumption by over 80%.

Abstract:
Standard evaluations of backdoor attacks on text-to-image (T2I) models primarily measure trigger activation and visual fidelity. We challenge this paradigm, demonstrating that encoder-side poisoning induces persistent, trigger-free semantic corruption that fundamentally reshapes the representation manifold. We trace this vulnerability to a geometric mechanism: a Jacobian-based analysis reveals that backdoors act as low-rank, target-centered deformations that amplify local sensitivity, causing distortion to propagate coherently across semantic neighborhoods. To rigorously quantify this structural degradation, we introduce SEMAD (Semantic Alignment and Drift), a diagnostic framework that measures both internal embedding drift and downstream functional misalignment. Our findings, validated across diffusion and contrastive paradigms, expose the deep structural risks of encoder poisoning and highlight the necessity of geometric audits beyond simple attack success rates.

Abstract:
In-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a powerful alternative to fine-tuning for Named Entity Recognition (NER), achieving strong performance with minimal annotation and no additional training. However, prior work has shown that despite their adaptability, LLMs still lag behind fully supervised models such as fine-tuned BERT in structured tasks like NER. While existing studies on ICL for NER have mainly explored few-shot settings, the potential of scaling to hundreds of demonstrations has not been thoroughly investigated. To address this gap, we conduct a comprehensive investigation of many-shot ICL for NER and further explore its effectiveness in annotating and refining data for low-resource NER tasks. Specifically, we evaluate various LLMs across multiple domains using hundreds of ICL examples and then assess the feasibility of using many-shot ICL as a data annotation framework. Our experiments demonstrate that: (1) scaling to hundreds of in-context examples enables LLMs to match or even surpass the performance of fully supervised BERT models; and (2) using about one hundred human-labeled examples as demonstrations, many-shot in-context annotation can generate high-quality labeled data, leading to approximately 10% absolute F1 improvement over existing state-of-the-art approaches when used to fine-tune BERT on low-resource NER.

Abstract:
Chinese ancient documents, invaluable carriers of millennia of Chinese history and culture, hold rich knowledge across diverse fields but face challenges in digitization and understanding—traditional methods only scan images, while current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle with their visual/linguistic complexity. Existing document benchmarks focus on English printed texts or simplified Chinese, leaving a gap for evaluating VLMs on ancient Chinese documents. To address this, we present AncientDoc, the first benchmark for Chinese ancient documents, designed to assess VLMs from OCR to knowledge reasoning. AncientDoc includes five tasks (page-level OCR, vernacular translation, reasoning-based QA, knowledge-based QA, linguistic variant QA) and covers 14 document types, over 100 books, and about 3,000 pages. Based on AncientDoc, we evaluate mainstream VLMs using multiple metrics, supplemented by a human-aligned large language model for scoring.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have facilitated Multimodal Summarization with Multimodal Output (MSMO), wherein systems generate concise textual summaries accompanied by salient visuals from multimodal sources. However, current MSMO evaluation remains fragmented: text quality, image-text alignment, and visual diversity are typically assessed in isolation using unimodal metrics, making it difficult to capture whether the modalities jointly support a faithful and useful summary. To address this gap, we introduce MM-Eval, a unified evaluation framework that integrates assessments of textual quality, cross-modal alignment, and visual diversity. MM-Eval comprises three components: (1) text quality, measured using OpenFActScore for factual consistency and G-Eval for coherence, fluency, and relevance; (2) image-text relevance, evaluated via an MLLM-as-a-judge approach; and (3) image-set diversity, quantified using Truncated CLIP Entropy. We calibrate -Eval through a learned aggregation model trained on the mLLM-EVAL news benchmark, aligning component contributions with human preferences. Our analysis reveals a text-dominant hierarchy in this setting, where factual consistency acts as a critical determinant of perceived overall quality, while visual relevance and diversity provide complementary signals. MM-Eval improves over heuristic aggregation baselines and provides an interpretable, reference-weak framework for comparative evaluation of multimodal summaries.

Abstract:
The ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow user instructions is central to their reliability, safety, and usefulness. While prior studies assess instruction adherence in the model’s main responses, we argue that it is also critical for large reasoning models (LRMs) to follow user instructions throughout their reasoning process. Reasoning instruction following makes LRMs more controllable and transparent, while reducing risks of undesirable shortcuts, hallucinations, or reward hacking within reasoning traces. To evaluate this dimension, we introduce ReasonIF, a systematic benchmark for assessing reasoning instruction following. ReasonIF includes six categories of instruction prompts, spanning multilingual reasoning, and length control. Across many open-source LRMs including GPT-OSS, Qwen3, and DeepSeek-R1, we find substantial failures in reasoning instruction adherence: the highest instruction following score (IFS) remains below 0.25, meaning that fewer than 25% of reasoning traces comply with the given instructions. Notably, as task difficulty increases, reasoning instruction following degrades further. We also explore two strategies to enhance reasoning instruction fidelity: (1) multi-turn reasoning and (2) Reasoning Instruction Finetuning (RIF) using synthetic data. RIF improves the IFS of GPT-OSS-20B from 0.11 to 0.27, indicating measurable progress but leaving ample room for improvement. We hope this work draws attention to reasoning-level instruction adherence as an underexplored but critical aspect of model alignment, and helps pave the way toward more controllable, interpretable, and trustworthy reasoning models.

Abstract:
Although Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) deliver state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance, they frequently suffer from hallucinations, e.g., generating text not grounded in the audio input. We analyze these grounding failures and identify a distinct taxonomy: Event Omission, False Event Identity, Temporal Relation Error, and Quantitative Temporal Error. To address this, we introduce the AHA (Audio Hallucination Alignment) framework. By leveraging counterfactual hard negative mining, our pipeline constructs a high-quality preference dataset that forces models to distinguish strict acoustic evidence from linguistically plausible fabrications. Additionally, we establish AHA-Eval, a diagnostic benchmark designed to rigorously test these fine-grained reasoning capabilities. We apply this data to align Qwen2.5-Omni. The resulting model, Qwen-Audio-AHA, achieves a 13.7% improvement on AHA-Eval. Crucially, this benefit generalizes beyond our diagnostic set. Our model shows substantial gains on public benchmarks, including 1.3% on MMAU-Test and 1.6% on MMAR, outperforming latest SOTA methods.

Abstract:
Video Speaking Style Recognition (VSSR) aims to classify conversation videos into different types, significantly facilitating human interaction understanding. Recent approaches explore the potential of large language models (LLM) in VSSR with a training-free process. However, directly integrating all multimodal data yields suboptimal results, since the great redundancy in visual data can overshadow other valuable multimodal information, such as valuable textual dialogues and critical visual clues. To address this, we propose CFMiS (Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Information Selection), a novel framework for VSSR that dynamically obtain valuable multimodal data via coarse-to-fine selection, enhancing LLM reasoning for VSSR. Specifically, the core of CFMiS are two cascaded modules: 1) a text-dominant modality selection module firstly selects VSSR-required modalities originating from text-based prediction; and 2) if vision is included in the selected modalities, a visual refinement module iteratively collects VSSR-relevant critical visual clues. The former resolves which modality to utilize, while the latter determines which information to adopt from selected modalities, efficiently alleviating information redundancy. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets prove that CFMiS is highly effective for VSSR, outperforming all existing training-free approaches and most training-based methods.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling (TTS) enhances LLM reasoning capabilities by sampling and aggregating diverse solution trajectories. However, existing approaches often rely on external verifiers and one-shot independent sampling, which results in inefficient budget allocation and underutilizes interim high-quality trajectories. We propose ConMA, a training-free, verifier-free TTS framework that reallocates a fixed inference budget into iterative sample–filter–diversify–select cycles: it filters answer groups based on intrinsic token-probability confidence, enriches candidates through diversity-aware expansion, and employs repeated single-choice selection for multi-stage refinement. Across multiple benchmarks, ConMA consistently improves accuracy under fixed budgets. With a maximum budget of N=64, ConMA boosts Qwen3-4B to 80% accuracy on AIME25, significantly outperforming strong baselines while converging early with only 18 samples on average, substantially reducing inference cost.

Abstract:
Sentiment analysis for low-resource languages remains challenging in an era where interpretability, human alignment, and fairness are increasingly non-negotiable aspects of modern machine learning systems. These challenges stem both from the scarcity of annotated data and from the resulting difficulty of conducting reliable, human-interpretable analyses that go beyond predictive accuracy. Telugu, one of the primary Dravidian languages with over 96 million speakers, is not an exception. In this work, we first introduce TeSent, a large-scale Telugu sentiment classification dataset annotated with sentiment labels and human-selected rationales from multiple native speakers. This resource enables the study of rationale-based supervision for aligning models with human reasoning in this low-resource setting. We fine-tune five transformer-based models with and without rationale supervision and evaluate them on classification performance, explanation quality, and social bias. To facilitate controlled fairness evaluation, we additionally construct TeEEC, an evaluation corpus for Telugu sentiment analysis. Our results show that incorporating human rationales consistently improves alignment and often leads to holistic gains in predictive performance. We further provide extensive analysis of multi-facade explanation quality and fairness, offering insights into the broader effects of alignment-oriented supervision in resource-scarce language contexts.

Abstract:
Formulating a treatment plan is inherently a complex reasoning and refinement task rather than a simple generation problem. However, existing large language models (LLMs) mainly rely on one-shot output without explicit verification, which may result in rough, incomplete, and potentially unsafe treatment plans. To address these limitations, we propose TheraAgent, an agentic framework that replaces one-shot generation with an iterative generate-judge-refine pipeline. By mirroring the actual reasoning process of human experts who iteratively revise treatment plans, our framework progressively transforms coarse and incomplete drafts into precise, comprehensive, and safer therapeutic regimens. To facilitate the critical judge component, we introduce TheraJudge, a treatment-specific evaluation module integrated into the inference loop to enforce clinical standards. Experiments show TheraAgent achieves state-of-the-art results on HealthBench, leading in Accuracy and Completeness. In expert evaluations, it attains an 86% win rate against physicians, with superior Targeting and Harm Control. Moreover, the highly agreement between TheraJudge and HealthBench evaluations confirms the reliability of our framework.

Abstract:
Mobile GUI agents show promise in automating tasks but face significant generalization challenges in long-tail scenarios. While learning from few-shot demonstrations is an emerging solution, its progress is hindered by two critical gaps: the lack of a comprehensive benchmark for systematic evaluation on mobile devices, and the absence of a systematic framework designed to learn from demonstrations in this domain. To address these gaps, we introduce LearnGUI , the first comprehensive benchmark designed for studying demonstration-based learning in mobile agents, comprising 2,252 offline and 101 online tasks. We further develop LearnAct , a modular agent framework engineered to systematically extract, retrieve, and leverage knowledge from visual demonstrations. Extensive evaluations across six backbone models validate our approach: LearnAct achieves dramatic improvements for general-purpose models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-Pro: 38.5%→58.9%) and specialized models alike (e.g., UI-TARS-7B-SFT’s online success rate: 18.1%→32.8%), demonstrating consistent gains across model architectures. Our work provides a robust benchmark and a systematic framework, paving the way for more adaptable and practical mobile agents. Our code and data are publicly available at https://lgy0404.github.io/LearnAct/ .

Abstract:
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction (ZSRE) aims to predict unseen relations for given entity pairs in sentences. Existing methods typically operate from a local perspective, predicting the relation for each entity pair (given its corresponding sentence) in isolation. Consequently, they often fail to distinguish between unseen, semantically similar relations, particularly when the sentence phrasing is ambiguous.To address this limitation, we propose G-NSR, a novel ZSRE framework built upon a Global Neuro-Symbolic Reasoner architecture, specifically designed to enable global reasoning across a set of predictions. The key idea is to model the logical relationships among multiple predictions, and perform neuro-symbolic reasoning to ensure logically consistent and more accurate predictions. Specifically, we first introduce Duality Type-Constrained Relation Schemas, which formulate each candidate relation as a pair of complementary positive-negative propositions. These propositions are then synthesized by our designed Neuro-Symbolic Reasoner, which explicitly models their logical interdependencies. By approximating logical rules, the reasoner allows high-confidence predictions to serve as evidence for refining incorrect results, ensuring the final predictions are logically consistent and more accurate. Extensive experiments on widely used datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches and establishes new state-of-the-art results across all evaluation settings. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/G-NSR

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress but continue to struggle with geometric reasoning, primarily due to the perception bottleneck regarding fine-grained visual elements. While formal languages have aided plane geometry understanding, solid geometry which requires spatial understanding remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we address this challenge by designing a unified formal language that integrates plane and solid geometry, comprehensively covering geometric structures and semantic relations. We construct GDP-29K, a large-scale dataset comprising 20k plane and 9k solid geometry samples collected from diverse real-world sources, each paired with its ground-truth formal description. We propose a training paradigm combining Supervised Fine-Tuning with Reinforcement Learning via Verifiable Rewards, which effectively enforces syntactic correctness and geometric consistency. Experiments show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art parsing performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our parsed formal descriptions serve as a critical cognitive scaffold, significantly boosting MLLMs’ capabilities for downstream geometry reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Autoregressive models have shown superior performance and efficiency in image generation, but remain constrained by high computational costs and prolonged training times in video generation. In this study, we explore methods to accelerate training for autoregressive video generation models through empirical analyses. Our results reveal that while training on fewer video frames significantly reduces training time, it also exacerbates error accumulation and introduces inconsistencies in the generated videos. To address these issues, we propose a Local Optimization (Local Opt.) method, which optimizes tokens within localized windows while leveraging contextual information to reduce error propagation. Inspired by Lipschitz continuity, we propose a Representation Continuity (ReCo) strategy to improve the consistency of generated videos. ReCo utilizes continuity loss to constrain representation changes, improving model robustness and reducing error accumulation. Extensive experiments on four class-to-video datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance to the baseline while halving the training cost without sacrificing quality.

Abstract:
Merging a large number of low-rank adaptations (LoRAs) is a key technology for enhancing the integration and deployment efficiency of large language models (LLMs). However, current general model merging methods are prone to “parameter interference” problem, and this issue is especially pronounced when merging high-rank LoRAs, where parameter conflicts tend to be more severe. While the classical rotation alignment approach can enhance robustness, it is difficult to apply due to incompatibility with the LoRA structure and its high computational complexity. To address these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage parameter alignment (TSPA) framework. TSPA is designed from the perspective of the LoRA architecture, overcoming the limitations of existing methods and reducing the computational complexity from quadratic to linear. We conduct experiments on Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks using models such as Llama-3-8B. The results show that the two-stage design of TSPA achieves a balance between task capabilities and general knowledge. It exhibits greater robustness than other methods in high-rank and high-interference scenarios, while effectively preserving fine-grained functions.

Abstract:
The rapid evolution of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has advanced workflow automation; however, existing research mainly targets performance upper bounds in static environments, overlooking robustness for stochastic real-world deployment. We identify three key challenges: dynamic task scheduling, active exploration under uncertainty, and continuous learning from experience. To bridge this gap, we introduce TraineeBench, a dynamic evaluation environment that simulates a "trainee" agent continuously exploring a novel setting. Unlike traditional benchmarks, TraineeBench evaluates agents along three dimensions: (1) context-aware scheduling for streaming tasks with varying priorities; (2) prudent information acquisition to reduce hallucination via active exploration; and (3) continuous evolution by distilling generalized strategies from rule-based, dynamically generated tasks. Experiments show that cutting-edge agents have significant deficiencies in dynamic environments, especially in active exploration and continual learning. Our work establishes a framework for assessing agent reliability, shifting evaluation from static tests to realistic, production-oriented scenarios.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents can complete tasks correctly yet still frustrate users through poor interaction patterns, such as excessive confirmations, opaque reasoning, or misaligned pacing. Current benchmarks evaluate task accuracy but overlook how agents interact: whether they infer preferences from implicit cues, adapt dynamically, or maintain fine-grained interaction quality. We introduce , a configurable environment that evaluates both what agents accomplish and how they interact. Central to is the Interaction-as-a-Tool (IaaT) paradigm, which treats interaction behaviors as structured tool calls, unifying them with existing evaluation frameworks. We define 31 preference settings across 14 attributes and formalize user experience (UX) as a core metric alongside task accuracy. A composite LLM-as-a-Judge mechanism across seven UX dimensions achieves strong aggregate reliability (ICC > 0.79), high internal consistency ( 𝛼 = 0.943), and human correlation ( 𝜌 = 0.52-0.78). Preference-aware agents show 7.6% average UX improvement and 18.5% gain in preference alignment.

Abstract:
Peer review is an essential process in scientific research, yet the growing workload has made its automation increasingly necessary. In this study, we analyze how different types of reviewer guidelines, such as official conference guidelines and reviewer-imitating ones distilled from high-quality human reviews, affect automated peer review. Our experiments show that official conference guidelines produce review results most consistent with human judgments, suggesting that evaluation criteria refined through conference practice serve as effective guidance for automated reviewing as well. In contrast, reviewer-imitating guidelines, especially those enforcing strict rubric-style scoring, consistently degraded automated review performance, highlighting the importance of allowing subjective and holistic scoring.

Abstract:
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) often suffers from performance degradation due to missing modalities in practical applications. Existing methods typically focus on feature completion but neglect semantic shifts caused by distribution gaps and decision risks under high uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a Distributional Error-Aware Reliability (DEAR) estimation framework for robust MSA. Specifically, we design a Hierarchical Distribution-Constrained Reconstruction (HDCR) module to mitigate semantic shifts by explicitly aligning reconstructed features with the original distributional manifold. Meanwhile, a reliability evaluation module (SURE) is introduced to quantitatively measure reconstruction fidelity. By perceiving inherent uncertainty, SURE provides a reliability-driven gating mechanism for the Synergistic-Robust Dual-Stream (SR-DS) architecture. This mechanism enables the model to dynamically adjust contribution weights: strengthening cross-modal synergistic effects when data fidelity is high, while shifting focus toward robust paths under high-risk missingness to safeguard performance. Extensive experiments on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS datasets validate the effectiveness and decision reliability of DEAR.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models but treats all correct solutions equally, potentially reinforcing flawed traces that arrive at correct answers by chance. We observe that better reasoning makes better demonstrations : high-quality solutions serve as more effective in-context examples than low-quality ones. We term this teaching ability Demonstration Utility , and show that the policy model’s own in-context learning ability provides an efficient way to measure it, yielding a quality signal termed Evidence Gain . To leverage this signal during training, we introduce In-Context RLVR , which prepends demonstrations before each rollout. Theoretically, we prove that this simple input modification implicitly reweights rewards by a factor approximately proportional to Evidence Gain, assigning higher weights to high-quality traces without requiring costly computation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in both accuracy and reasoning quality over standard RLVR baselines. Our codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Mithas-114/IC-DAPO .

Abstract:
Learning with Noisy Labels (LNL) is a challenge where the collected training set can contain incorrect or corrupted labels. Most existing solutions distinguish clean samples from noisy samples and query human experts on noisy samples for denoising. However, these solutions often operate under the unrealistic assumption that the distribution of classes is uniform, overlooking the skewed and imbalanced distributions frequently encountered in real-world scenarios. In this case, we empirically reveal that previous solutions suffer from both selection bias and training bias, leading to distinguish clean samples from noisy samples hardly. In this paper, our work introduces the imbalanced learning with noisy labels (i-LNL) task, which seeks to let the model learn from noisy labels within imbalanced distributions. A new benchmark (ImbaLNL-Bench) comprised of some synthetic and real-world datasets is created to provide a thorough representation of practical use cases. Besides, we propose an innovative collaborative learning framework DeCo for i-LNL tasks. Specifically, we first conduct debiased sample selection, consisting of a robust expert model and a debiased-enhanced threshold strategy, to better separate clean samples from noisy samples, especially for the tail classes. Then we feed selected clean samples to active annotator large language models (LLMs) for re-annotating noisy samples using in-context learning, which can better reduce human effort. Ultimately, we employ distinct loss functions adept at managing subsets with varying degrees of label noise. Extensive experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness and superiority of our method.

Abstract:
Neural Processing Units (NPUs) are critical for AI infrastructure, yet developing kernels remains a bottleneck due to the complexity of vendor-specific Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs). While LLMs excel in general coding, they fail to meet the stringent constraints of NPU development, showing a near-zero success rate on complex kernels in our preliminary study. To address these challenges, we present AscendKernelGen, the first comprehensive framework for NPU kernel development, marking a pioneering effort in this field. This framework consists of three interconnected components: (1) Ascend-CoT, the first dataset in the NPU kernel domain that incorporates chain-of-thought reasoning from real-world kernel implementations; (2) KernelGen-LM, a domain-adaptive model trained on this novel dataset using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning; and (3) NPUKernelBench, the first benchmark platform designed to evaluate the compilation, correctness, and performance of generated NPU kernels. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach dramatically bridges the gap in hardware-specific coding: compilation success on complex Level-2 kernels improves from 0% to 95.5% (Pass@10), with 64% functional correctness. AscendKernGen is available at AscendKernGen and NPUKernelBench.

Abstract:
E-commerce search relevance is a critical component of retrieval systems. While Large Language Models (LLMs)-driven Chain-of-Thought (CoT) modeling has become the dominant paradigm and yielded significant gains, a critical gap remains: the absence of a systematic definition for comprehensive relevance reasoning, which leads to significant blind spots in current approaches. In this paper, we deconstruct the task into three core competencies: reasoning knowledge, multi-modal understanding, and rule awareness. Accordingly, we propose LoRE(Large Generative Model for Search Relevance), a novel two-stage training framework. We first employ an SFT phase to instill these capabilities via a progressive CoT synthesis pipeline, followed by a Reinforcement Learning(RL) phase, which serves as a regularizer, pruning redundant logic to achieve precise and robust adjudication. Extensive experiments validate LoRE, outperforming GPT-5 by 29.1% in Macro-F1 and achieving a 27% online gain, offering a vital reference for industrial domain-specific post-training.

Abstract:
Persuasive dialogue generation plays a vital role in decision-making, negotiation, counseling, and behavior change, yet it remains a challenging problem. In complex persuasion where the persuadee’s internal states are not expressed clearly, the persuader must interpret responses, infer the persuadee’s latent mental states (e.g., beliefs and desires), and translate them into targeted, strategy-consistent actions; however, current approaches often produce generic or weakly grounded responses even when such cues are identified. Moreover, although large language models (LLMs) can generate persuasive content, their performance varies substantially across domains due to uneven knowledge coverage and limited reasoning generalization. To address these challenges, we propose MA 2 P, a meta-cognitive autonomous intelligent agent framework for complex persuasion. Specifically, we develop an autonomous multi-agent architecture that coordinates perception management, mental-state inference, strategy execution, memory maintenance, and performance evaluation. To mitigate cross-domain performance variation, we further design a meta-cognitive configurator that selects an appropriate meta-strategy from a structured knowledge base at the outset, thereby guiding subsequent reasoning and planning. Experimental results show that our approach achieves a higher persuasion success rate than baselines.

Abstract:
LLM role-playing seeks to portray arbitrary characters in interactive narratives, yet existing systems often lack immersion and adapt ability. They typically under-model dynamic environment information and assume a largely static scene/cast, offering limited support for multi-character orchestration, scene transitions, and on-the-fly character introduction. We propose an adaptive multi-agent interaction framework dubbed AdaMARP, which featuring an immersive message format that interleaves [Thought], (Action), Environment, and Speech, and an explicit Scene Manager that controls role-playing via discrete actions (init_scene, pick_speaker, switch_scene, add_role, end) with rationales. To train these abilities, we construct AdaRPSet for the Actor Model and AdaSMSet for supervising or chestration decisions, and introduce AdaptiveBench for trajectory-level evaluation. Experiments across multiple backbones and scales show consistent gains: AdaRPSet improves character consistency, environment grounding, and narrative coherence—an 8B actor outperforming several commercial LLMs, while AdaSMSet enables smoother scene transitions and more natural role introductions, surpassing Claude Sonnet 4.5 with only 14B LLMs.

Abstract:
Quantization-Aware Training from scratch has emerged as a promising approach for building efficient large language models (LLMs) with extremely low-bit weights (sub 2-bit), which can offer substantial advantages for edge deployment. However, existing methods still fail to achieve satisfactory accuracy and scalability. In this work, we identify a parameter democratization effect as a key bottleneck: the sensitivity of all parameters becomes homogenized, severely limiting expressivity. To address this, we propose pQuant, a method that decouples parameters by splitting linear layers into two specialized branches: a dominant 1-bit branch for efficient computation and a compact high-precision branch dedicated to preserving the most sensitive parameters. Through tailored feature scaling, we explicitly guide the model to allocate sensitive parameters to the high-precision branch. Furthermore, we extend this branch into multiple, sparsely-activated experts, enabling efficient capacity scaling. Extensive experiments indicate our pQuant achieves state-of-the-art performance in extremely low-bit quantization.

Abstract:
Fine-grained entity typing (FET) aims to assign semantically rich and contextually appropriate types to entity mentions. While recent studies have explored the use of large language models (LLMs) for this task, two key challenges persist. First, FET typically involves a large number of entity types, making it difficult for LLMs to perform accurate classification. Second, the presence of label noise in the training data introduced by automatic supervision methods hinders effective fine-tuning. To address these challenges, we propose DR-FET, a descriptor-based retrieval-augmented framework that reduces the effective label space and constructs high-precision training data under noisy supervision. Our method introduces natural language descriptors as an intermediate semantic representation for both entity mentions and types. During inference, entity descriptors are used to retrieve a small set of semantically relevant candidate types, enabling the LLM to perform fine-grained classification under explicit candidate constraints. During training, the same descriptor and retrieval mechanism is reused to identify high-confidence instances from distantly supervised data, prioritizing label precision for efficient fine-tuning. Experiments on two widely used benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing fine-grained entity typing approaches under noisy supervision.

Abstract:
Human scanpaths offer rich and reliable clues about the cognitive mechanisms underlying language comprehension. Decoder-only language models, typically large language models (LLMs), have proven to exhibit striking parallels with human cognitive processes. In this study, we investigate to what extent language models can be endowed with human-like gaze shifts. Besides, by probing scanpath through eye model, analogous to probing language through language models, we ask whether such modeling can yield novel knowledge of the cognitive machinery of sense making.This study presents a novel plug-and-play module, EyeLM, to transform an autoregressive language model into an autoregressive eye model, thus facilitating a probabilistic spatial modeling of human explicit attention. Our EyeLM module, powered by LLMs, achieves competitive performance with novel cognitive probing capabilities. By probing EyeLM, we can reach the predictability and uncertainty of the scanpath. Exhibiting aligned patterns with prior knowledge about human reading comprehension, these probabilistic measures of scanpath act as promising predictors of human comprehension skills.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large reasoning models have been driven by reinforcement learning and test-time scaling, accompanied by growing interest in latent rather than purely textual reasoning. However, existing latent reasoning methods lack mechanisms to ensure stable reasoning dynamics in latent space and a systematic way to interleave implicit and explicit reasoning. We introduce SpiralThinker, a unified framework that performs iterative updates over latent representations while enabling interleaved reasoning across latent and textual steps. At its core, SpiralThinker employs a progressive alignment objective and structured annotations to stabilize latent reasoning and maintain coherence with textual reasoning. Across mathematical, logical, and commonsense reasoning tasks, SpiralThinker achieves state-of-the-art performance among latent reasoning baselines. Detailed analyses reveal that both iteration and alignment are indispensable, the numbers of latent tokens and iterations exhibit dataset-specific optima, and appropriate alignment proves critical for an effective iterative process. Overall, SpiralThinker bridges iterative computation and latent reasoning, demonstrating that aligned iterative updates can reliably steer reasoning in the latent space.

Abstract:
Novelty is a core requirement in academic publishing and a central focus of peer review, yet the growing volume of submissions has placed increasing pressure on human reviewers. While large language models (LLMs), including those fine-tuned on peer review data, have shown promising results in generating review comments, the absence of dedicated benchmarks has limited systematic evaluation of their ability to assess research novelty. To address this gap, we introduce NovBench, the first large-scale benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ capability to generate novelty evaluations in support of human peer review. NovBench comprises 1,684 paper–review pairs from a leading NLP conference, including novelty descriptions extracted from paper introductions and corresponding expert-written novelty evaluations. We focus on both sources because the introduction provides a standardized and explicit articulation of novelty claims, while expert-written novelty evaluations constitute one of the current gold standards of human judgment. Furthermore, we propose a four-dimensional evaluation framework (including Relevance, Correctness, Coverage, and Clarity) to assess the quality of LLM-generated novelty evaluations. Extensive experiments on both general and specialized LLMs under different prompting strategies reveal that current models exhibit limited understanding of scientific novelty, and that fine-tuned models often suffer from instruction-following deficiencies. Our findings underscore the need for targeted fine-tuning strategies that jointly improve novelty comprehension and instruction adherence.

Abstract:
With the rapid progress of LLMs, high quality generative text has become widely available as a cover for text steganography. However, prevailing methods rely on hand-crafted or pre-specified strategies and struggle to balance efficiency, imperceptibility, and security, particularly at high embedding rates. Accordingly, we propose Auto-Stega, an agent-driven self-evolving framework that is the first to realize self-evolving steganographic strategies by automatically discovering, composing, and adapting strategies at inference time; the framework operates as a closed loop of generating, evaluating, summarizing, and updating that continually curates a structured strategy library and adapts across corpora, styles, and task constraints. A decoding LLM recovers the information under the shared strategy. To handle high embedding rates, we introduce PC-DNTE, a plug-and-play algorithm that maintains alignment with the base model’s conditional distribution at high embedding rates, preserving imperceptibility while enhancing security. Experimental results demonstrate that at higher embedding rates Auto-Stega achieves superior performance with gains of 42.2% in perplexity and 1.6% in anti-steganalysis performance over SOTA methods.

Abstract:
Scientific opinion classification based on discourse functions provides a structured semantic basis for analytical tasks such as gap identification and hypothesis generation. However, this task is uniquely challenged by the multi-label nature of scientific expressions and AIMRaD structural constraints. Existing LLM-based methods typically rely on direct label generation, which obscures decision logic, or treat discourse information as passive context rather than a structural prior. We propose OPINE, a multi-stage framework that reformulates classification as a controllable scoring-calibration-refinement pipeline. By decoupling textual evidence from decision logic, OPINE generates independent label-wise affinity scores calibrated by AIMRaD priors. To resolve the multi-label challenge, we introduce a quantile-based decoding rule to naturally capture co-existing roles, alongside a pairwise refinement mechanism to mitigate confusion between similar categories. We contribute a new benchmark of 18 discourse functions across diverse sections. Experimental results show that OPINE generally outperforms strong baselines, reaching F1 scores of 63.20%, 53.68%, and 63.22% under Micro, Macro, and Example settings, respectively. Our analysis reveals that integrating discourse structures as explicit priors is superior to conventional passive context integration, while pairwise refinement successfully mitigates confusion between functionally similar categories. The code and dataset are available at https://github.com/znoodle63/OPINE.

Abstract:
Model editing-based jailbreak backdoor attacks against LLMs have gained attention for being lightweight, enabling vulnerability discovery in LLMs. Existing methods are implemented by binding backdoors to predefined phrases as first few output tokens, inducing the LLM’s next-token prediction to produce continuous responses. However, their effectiveness is heavily dependent on the number of bound phrases, with attack costs rising as this number increases. In this work, we propose JEST, which achieves jailbreak backdoor attacks by hijacking LLM representations into a acceptance domain rather than binding to a few output tokens. Specifically, we propose a representation transition-guided model editing to inject jailbreak backdoors into LLMs. The activated backdoor transitions the LLM from rejection domain to acceptance domain, causing it to accept and generate jailbreak behavior. To clearly distinguish between rejection and acceptance domains within LLMs, we also design a domain modeling strategy for JEST that models these two opposing domains within the representation space. Additionally, JEST-hijacked LLMs exhibit greater vulnerability to direct prompt attacks. Experimental results show that JEST outperforms existing model editing methods, demonstrating stronger jailbreak capabilities across various LLMs and datasets. We also provide analysis to explore the safety boundary of LLM.

Abstract:
Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved significant success across various tasks. These models usually encode visual inputs into dense token sequences, which are then concatenated with textual tokens and jointly processed by a language model. However, the increased token count substantially raises computational and memory costs during inference. Token pruning has emerged as a promising approach to address this issue. Existing token pruning methods often rely on costly calibration or suboptimal importance metrics, leading to redundant retained tokens. In this paper, we analyze the redundancy differences between visual and textual tokens and propose pruning exclusively on visual tokens. Based on this, we propose a visual token pruning strategy that explicitly preserves both cross-modal alignment and intra-modal informational diversity. We introduce a mutual information-based token pruning strategy that removes visual tokens semantically misaligned with textual tokens, effectively preserving the alignment between the visual and textual modalities. We further refine the retained tokens by maximizing their expected pairwise distances in the latent space to enhance representational quality and reduce redundancy. which is solved efficiently with a greedy algorithm. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method maintains strong performance while reducing tokens by 88.9% on models such as LLaVA-1.5-7B and LLaVA-NEXT-7B, resulting in a 56.7% improvement in inference speed.

Abstract:
Recent reports suggest that LLMs can handle increasingly long contexts. However, many existing benchmarks for context understanding embed substantial query-irrelevant content, which shifts evaluation toward retrieving relevant snippets rather than fully integrating all provided information. Under this setting, we view that current benchmarks can overestimate true context-understanding ability of LLMs. In particular, we demonstrate that when the context consists entirely of query-relevant text, even advanced models such as GPT-4o fail to reliably integrate inputs as short as 200 tokens. To evaluate this capability more rigorously, we introduce NeedleChain, a benchmark designed to test whether models can faithfully incorporate all given evidence. NeedleChain includes three variants that differ in the required order of comprehension, along with a parallel benchmark based on the needle-in-a-haystack(NIAH) paradigm. By comparing these variants, NeedleChain enables a more comprehensive assessment of context understanding. We further propose a training-free strategy that encourages models to reflect all available information, ROPE contraction, highlighting the importance of full-context integration and pointing to new directions for improving reliable reasoning over context.

Abstract:
Financial decision-making in multilingual settings demands accurate numerical reasoning grounded in diverse modalities, yet existing benchmarks largely overlook this high-stakes, real-world challenge, especially for Indic languages. We introduce FinVQA, a benchmark for evaluating financial numerical and multimodal reasoning in multilingual Indic contexts. FinVQA spans English, Hindi, Bengali, Marathi, Gujarati, and Tamil, and comprises 18,900 samples across 14 financial domains. The dataset captures diverse reasoning paradigms under realistic constraints, and is structured across three difficulty levels (easy, moderate, hard) and four question formats: multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, table matching, and true/false. To address these challenges, we propose FIND, a framework that combines supervised fine-tuning with constraint-aware decoding to promote faithful numerical reasoning, robust multimodal grounding, and structured decision-making. Together, FinVQA and FIND establish a rigorous evaluation and modeling paradigm for high-stakes multilingual multimodal financial reasoning.

Abstract:
Common ground plays a critical role in situated spoken dialogues, where interlocutors must establish and maintain shared references to entities, events, and relations to sustain coherent interaction. For dialog systems, the ability to correctly ground conversational content in order to refer back to it later is particularly important. Prior studies have demonstrated that LLMs are capable of performing grounding acts such as requesting clarification or producing acknowledgments, yet relatively little work has investigated how common ground can be explicitly represented and stored for later use. Without such mechanisms, it remains unclear whether acknowledgment or clarification behaviors truly reflect a grounded understanding. In this work, we evaluate a model’s ability to establish and exploit common ground through relational references to entities within the shared context in a situational dialogue. We test multiple methods for representing common ground in situated dialogues and further propose approaches to improve both the establishment of common ground and its subsequent use in the conversation.

Abstract:
While the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have advanced considerably, efficiently internalizing and leveraging new information in dynamically interactive environments remains a significant challenge. This limitation is particularly pronounced in partially observable environments, which require agents to manage long-term memory and perform effective exploration under incomplete information. To address this, we propose an LLM agent architecture that integrates a knowledge graph as a graph-based memory module. The agent incrementally constructs the knowledge graph through environmental interactions and retrieves relevant information to generate efficient plans. We evaluate our approach in complex navigation tasks specifically designed to present long-horizon and partially observable challenges. Experimental results demonstrate that incorporating a self-extending memory module significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of the LLM’s planning capabilities.

Abstract:
Speculative decoding (SD), where a small draft model is employed to propose draft tokens in advance and then the target model validates them in parallel, has emerged as a promising technique for LLM inference acceleration. Many endeavors to improve SD are to eliminate the need for a draft model and generate draft tokens in a retrieval-based manner in order to further alleviate the drafting overhead and significantly reduce the difficulty in deployment and applications. However, retrieval-based SD relies on a matching paradigm to retrieve the most relevant reference as the draft tokens, where these methods often fail to find matched and accurate draft tokens. To address this challenge, we propose LogitSpec to effectively expand the retrieval range and find the most relevant reference as drafts. LogitSpec is motivated by the observation that the logit of the last token can not only predict the next token, but also speculate the next next token. Specifically, LogitSpec generates draft tokens in two steps: (1) utilizing the last logit to speculate the next next token; (2) retrieving relevant reference for both the next token and the next next token. LogitSpec is training-free and plug-and-play, which can be easily integrated into existing LLM inference frameworks. Extensive experiments on a wide range of text generation benchmarks demonstrate that LogitSpec can achieve up to 2.61× speedup and 3.28 mean accepted tokens per decoding step.

Abstract:
Fei Xiaotong’s Differential Order Pattern characterizes rural society as egocentric and relationally graded, with cooperation attenuating over social distance. Although often treated as culturally specific, its mechanistic basis remains under-operationalized, and prior LLM-based simulations have mainly addressed short-term coordination rather than long-horizon social structure. We propose CAREB-MAS, a multi-agent framework grounded in Affect Control Theory, Social Identity Theory, and Durkheimian collective affect. Agents reason through an emotion–ethics–belief chain and maintain dynamically evolving egocentric identities, while the macro environment specifies only individual production, preference-based allocation, and minimal interaction protocols. Across long-horizon simulations, agents spontaneously reproduce five core Differential Order phenomena: stable labor specialization, guanxi-based economic ethics, relational decay of cooperation, emergent relational authority, and clan-based center–periphery stratification. These patterns shift with production structure from kin-centered integration toward greater functional interdependence. Extensive experiment results support interpreting Differential Order as a structure-sensitive emergent outcome of general social mechanisms, with LLM-based multi-agent simulation providing a interdisciplinary framework for studying social structure and change.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly propelled downstream innovation, yet pervasive sensitive information in training data and the models’ memory characteristics pose severe privacy leakage risks. This contravenes core requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the right to be forgotten, becoming a critical bottleneck for secure and compliant deployment. Existing privacy protection methods have notable limitations: data preprocessing fails to cover context-dependent sensitive information; differential privacy (DP) and homomorphic encryption (HE) degrade model performance and increase computational overhead; traditional machine unlearning may cause catastrophic collapse; and neuron editing methods struggle with the accuracy-efficiency trade-off in privacy neuron localization, alongside privacy seesaw phenomena and general performance degradation. To address these challenges, this paper proposes LDEDE, a Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP)-driven framework for efficient privacy neuron detection and editing. It offers three core advantages: 1) Precise multi-scale privacy localization via LRP-based relevance backpropagation and multi-token attention aggregation, achieving over 80% higher efficiency than gradient attribution methods; 2) First reveals the existence of "coupled privacy neurons" in LLMs, which are the key cause of the privacy seesaw phenomenon—mitigated by Polarity-Aware Neuron Editing (PANE) with differentiated logic; 3) Enhanced robustness and generalization for batch processing via privacy neuron aggregation. Experiments on Enron and MIMIC datasets demonstrate that compared to baselines, LDEDE maintains comparable general performance while reducing leakage risks of Phone, Email, and medical privacy by 42.7%–73.5% on average and cutting computational time by 60%–90%. It also exhibits stable performance across GPT-2, BERT-base, and LLAMA-7B, providing an efficient, lightweight solution for post-deployment dynamic LLM privacy protection.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks despite extensive safety alignment. While automated red-teaming has emerged as a critical evaluation protocol, existing methods face two primary limitations: they largely explore homogeneous transformations in isolation, and they rely on brittle judgment metrics that frequently misclassify non-refusal hallucinations as successful attacks. In this paper, we reformulate jailbreak attacks as a compositional search problem guided by context-aware evaluation. We propose Chimera, a framework that generates compositional jailbreak attacks via judgment-driven search over heterogeneous strategies. Chimera systematically explores the combinatorial space of disjoint primitives, such as integrating technical obfuscation with semantic persuasion, under strict ordering constraints. Crucially, to drive the search process effectively, we introduce StrongREJECT++, a relevance-aware metric that eliminates false positive rewards by penalizing irrelevant responses. Experiments on multiple open-source and commercial LLMs show that Chimera uncovers qualitatively different vulnerability regions and consistently improves attack success rates and transferability compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Modern automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have been observed to function better for certain speaker groups (SGs) than others, despite recent gains in overall performance. One potential impediment to progress towards fairer ASR is a more nuanced understanding of the types of modeling errors that speech encoder models make, and in particular the difference between the structure of embeddings for high-performance and low-performance SGs. This paper proposes a framework typifying two types of error that can occur in modeling phonemes in ASR systems: random error/high variance in phoneme embedding, vs systematic error/embedding bias. We find that training phoneme classification probes only on a single, typically disadvantaged SG, sometimes improves performance for that SG, which is evidence for the existence of SG-level bias in phoneme embeddings. On the other hand, we find that speakers and SGs with higher levels of phoneme variance are the same as those with worse phoneme prediction accuracy. We conclude that both types of error are present in phoneme embeddings and both are candidate causes for SG-level unfairness in ASR, though random error is likely a greater hindrance to fairness than systematic error. Furthermore, we find that finetuning encoder models using a fairness-enhancing algorithm (domain enhancing and adversarial training) changes neither the benefits of in-domain phoneme classification probe training, nor measured levels of random embedding error.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit systematic biases across demographic groups. Auditing is proposed as an accountability tool for black-box LLM applications, but suffers from resource-intensive query access. We conceptualise auditing as uncertainty estimation over a target fairness metric and introduce BAFA, the Bounded Active Fairness Auditor for query-efficient auditing of black-box LLMs. BAFA maintains a version space of surrogate models consistent with queried scores and computes uncertainty intervals for fairness metrics (e.g., 𝛥 AUC) via constrained empirical risk minimisation. Active query selection narrows these intervals to reduce estimation error. We evaluate BAFA on two standard fairness dataset case studies: CivilComments and Bias-in-Bios, comparing against stratified sampling, power sampling, and ablations. BAFA achieves target error thresholds with up to 40 × fewer queries than stratified sampling (e.g., 144 vs 5,956 queries at 𝜀=0.02 for CivilComments) for tight thresholds, demonstrates substantially better performance over time, and shows lower variance across runs. These results suggest that active sampling can reduce resources needed for independent fairness auditing with LLMs, supporting continuous model evaluations.

Abstract:
While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) offer powerful capabilities, they pose privacy risks by unintentionally memorizing sensitive personal information. Current unlearning benchmarks attempt to mitigate this using fictitious identities but overlook a critical stage 1 failure : models fail to effectively memorize target information initially, rendering subsequent unlearning evaluations unreliable. Diagnosing under-memorization and the multi-hop curse as root causes, we introduce ReMem, a Reliable Multi-hop and Multi-image Memorization Benchmark. ReMem ensures robust foundational learning through principled data scaling, reasoning-aware QA pairs, and diverse visual contexts. Additionally, we propose a novel Exposure metric to quantify the depth of information erasure from the model’s internal probability distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ReMem provides a rigorous and trustworthy framework for diagnosing both learning and unlearning behaviors in LVLMs.

Abstract:
Structured texts – from technical reports to AI prompts – increasingly require segmentation into semantically meaningful components. Such texts often contain elements beyond plain language, such as code snippets, which conventional sentence-level segmentation methods cannot handle effectively. To address this, we propose BoundRL, a novel approach that jointly performs efficient token-level text segmentation and label prediction for long structured texts. Instead of generating full texts for each segment, it generates only starting tokens and reconstructs the complete texts by locating these tokens within the original texts, thereby reducing inference costs by 90% and minimizing hallucination. To train the models for the boundary generation, BoundRL performs reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) that jointly optimizes document reconstruction fidelity and semantic alignment. It further mitigates entropy collapse by constructing intermediate candidates by perturbing segment boundaries and labels to create stepping stones toward higher-quality solutions. Experiments show that BoundRL enables small language models (1.7B parameters) to outperform few-shot prompting with much larger models as well as SFT and standard RLVR baselines on complex prompts used for LLM applications.

Abstract:
Retrosynthesis planning enables the discovery of viable synthetic routes for target molecules, playing a crucial role in domains like drug discovery and materials design. Multi-step retrosynthetic planning remains computationally challenging due to exponential search spaces and inference costs. While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate chemical reasoning capabilities, their application to synthesis planning faces constraints on efficiency and cost. To address these challenges, we introduce AOT, a framework that transforms retrosynthetic planning by integrating LLM-generated chemical synthesis pathways with systematic AND-OR tree search. To this end, AOT maps the generated complete synthesis routes onto AND-OR tree components, with a mathematically sound design of reward assignment strategy and retrieval-based context engineering, thus enabling LLMs to efficiently navigate in the chemical space. Experimental evaluation on multiple synthesis benchmarks demonstrates that AOT achieves SOTA performance with significantly improved search efficiency. AOT exhibits competitive solve rates using 3-5 × fewer iterations than existing LLM-based approaches, with the performance advantage becoming more pronounced on complex molecular targets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ShawnKS/AOTstar.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for everyday communication tasks, including drafting interpersonal messages intended to influence and persuade. Prior work has shown that LLMs can successfully persuade humans and amplify persuasive language. It is therefore essential to understand how user instructions affect the generation of persuasive language, and to understand whether the generated persuasive language differs, for example, when targeting different groups. In this work, we propose a framework for evaluating how persuasive language generation is affected by recipient gender, sender intent, or output language. We evaluate 13 LLMs and 16 languages using pairwise prompt instructions. We evaluate model responses on 19 categories of persuasive language using an LLM-as-judge setup grounded in social psychology and communication science. Our results reveal significant gender differences in the persuasive language generated across all models. These patterns reflect biases consistent with gender-stereotypical linguistic tendencies documented in social psychology and sociolinguistics.

Abstract:
We introduce TableVista, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating foundation models in multimodal table reasoning under visual and structural complexity. TableVista consists of 3,000 high-quality table reasoning problems, where each instance is expanded into 10 distinct visual variants through our multi-style rendering and transformation pipeline. This process encompasses diverse scenario styles, robustness perturbations, and vision-only configurations, culminating in 30,000 multimodal samples for a multi-dimensional evaluation. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 29 state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary foundation models on TableVista. Through comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis, we find that while evaluated models remain largely stable across diverse rendering styles, they exhibit pronounced performance degradation on complex structural layouts and vision-only settings, revealing that current models struggle to maintain reasoning consistency when structural complexity combines with visually integrated presentations. These findings highlight critical gaps in current multimodal capabilities, providing insights for advancing more robust and reliable table understanding models.

Abstract:
Topic modeling seeks to uncover latent semantic structure in text corpora with minimal supervision. Neural approaches achieve strong performance but require extensive tuning and struggle with lifelong learning due to catastrophic forgetting and fixed capacity, while classical probabilistic models lack flexibility and adaptability to streaming data. We introduce CobwebTM, a low-parameter lifelong hierarchical topic model based on incremental probabilistic concept formation. By adapting the Cobweb algorithm to continuous document embeddings, CobwebTM constructs semantic hierarchies online, enabling unsupervised topic discovery, dynamic topic creation, and hierarchical organization without predefining the number of topics. Across diverse datasets, CobwebTM achieves strong topic coherence, stable topics over time, and high-quality hierarchies, demonstrating that incremental symbolic concept formation combined with pretrained representations is an efficient approach to topic modeling.

Abstract:
This paper offers a call to action. We urge our colleagues in the research community to play a greater role in the articulation of our findings to the public. To illustrate the stakes we present a case study on the initial stages of an LLM-based machine translation application’s deployment in a real-world context: a text-2-911 system advertising capabilities in 55 languages for use in emergencies in which it may be difficult to call operators directly. We identify a number of common misconceptions about technologies such as these, concluding with a set of concrete recommendations and best practices for stakeholders at every stage of the development and deployment pipeline. While the advancement of scientific research often lies in solving the "hard" problems, we argue it is often the "easy" ones— problems for which the latest technology is often unnecessary— that are most overlooked.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge, effectively mitigating their inherent knowledge limitations. However, RAG remains vulnerable to poisoning attacks that manipulate retrieved texts to mislead model outputs. Existing defense mechanisms often lack theoretical robustness guarantees and perform unreliably when the LLM has limited knowledge of the retrieved content. In this work, we propose PRA-RAG, a provably robust retrieval aggregation algorithm designed to defend against poisoning attacks on retrieved texts. PRA-RAG samples multiple combinations of retrieved texts and utilizes geometric structures in the embedding space to identify a robust subset, from which a stable aggregated representation is derived. We provide theoretical bounds on the maximum impact of poisoned retrieved content and establish a quantitative measure of RAG’s robustness. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and RAG architectures demonstrate that PRA-RAG reduces the attack success rate to as low as 1% while maintaining an accuracy of 71%, significantly outperforming representative state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods.

Abstract:
We present ViLegalLM, comprising ViLegalBERT and ViLegalQwen, the first suite of Vietnamese pretrained language models for legal text understanding and generation. It includes one encoder-only model (ViLegalBERT, 135M parameters) and two decoder-only models (ViLegalQwen2.5-1.5B-Base and ViLegalQwen3-1.7B-Base), all continually pretrained on a newly curated 16GB Vietnamese legal corpus, significantly larger than previous work. To mitigate data scarcity, we construct three synthetic datasets using LLM-based generation and hard negative mining for True/False QA, Multiple Choice QA, and Natural Language Inference. We establish state-of-the-art results among open-source models on four main Vietnamese legal downstream tasks spanning ten benchmarks, demonstrating that continual pretraining from base models consistently outperforms instruction-tuned adaptation. Source codes, corpus, datasets, and model checkpoints are publicly available at https://github.com/ntphuc149/ViLegalLM.

Abstract:
Some text generation tasks, such as Attribute Value Extraction (AVE), require decoding multiple independent sequences from the same document context. While standard autoregressive decoding is slow due to its sequential nature, the independence between output sequences offers an opportunity for parallelism. We present Hyper-Parallel Decoding, a novel decoding algorithm that accelerates offline decoding by leveraging both shared memory and computation across batches. HPD enables out-of-order token generation through position ID manipulation, significantly improving efficiency. Experiments on AVE show that attribute-value pairs are conditionally independent, enabling us to parallelize value generation within each prompt. By further stacking multiple documents within a single prompt, we can decode in parallel up to 96 tokens per prompt. HPD works with all LLMs, and reduces both inference costs and total inference time by up to 13.8X without compromising output quality, potentially saving hundreds of thousands of dollars on industry AVE tasks. Although designed for attribute extraction, HPD makes no assumptions unique to the AVE domain and can in theory be applied to other scenarios with independent output structures.

Abstract:
Language places subtle constraints on how we make inductive inferences. Developmental evidence by Gelman et al. (2002) has shown children (4 years and older) to differentiate among generic statements ("Bears are daxable"), universally quantified NPs ("all bears are daxable") and indefinite plural NPs ("some bears are daxable") in extending novel properties to a specific member (all > generics > some), suggesting that they represent these types of propositions differently. We test if these subtle differences arise in general purpose statistical learners like Vision Language Models, by replicating the original experiment. On tasking them through a series of precondition tests (robust identification of categories in images and sensitivities to all and some), followed by the original experiment, we find behavioral alignment between models and humans. Post-hoc analyses on their representations revealed that these differences are organized based on inductive constraints and not surface-form differences.

Abstract:
Learning unknown knowledge through ICL and RAG can enhance LLM capabilities in specialized fields. While most research focuses on how to identify and utilize such knowledge, little work examines what factors lead LLMs to trust and adopt it, leaving models prone to errors and harmful content. Grounded in extensive pre-experiments, we design five pairs of trust-enhancing and trust-diminishing transformations on unknown knowledge to experimentally identify the key trust factors. These findings are further substantiated through a detailed theoretical analysis grounded in the epistemological framework of evidentialism. Based on these insights, we challengingly propose a completely unrestricted and fully randomized jailbreak attack that embeds malicious queries within trust-enhanced unknown knowledge. In both defended and undefended scenarios, our method achieves 99% to 100% ASR on all tested LLMs, including the latest GPT-5.1, and becomes SOTA. This attack confirms the trust mechanism and exposes a critical and hard-to-defend security risk. Our conclusions provide valuable guidance for understanding trust mechanism of unknown knowledge and for future research.

Abstract:
AI-driven automated scoring systems offer scalable and efficient means of evaluating complex student-generated responses. Yet, despite increasing demand for transparency and interpretability, the field has yet to develop a widely accepted solution for interpretable automated scoring to be used in large-scale real-world assessments. This work takes a principled approach to address this challenge. We analyze the needs and potential benefits of interpretable automated scoring for various assessment stakeholder groups and develop four principles of interpretability – (F)aithfulness, (G)roundedness, (T)raceability, and (I)nterchangeability (FGTI) – targeted at those needs. To illustrate the feasibility of implementing these principles, we develop the AnalyticScore framework as a baseline reference framework. When applied to the domain of text-based constructed-response scoring, AnalyticScore outperforms many uninterpretable scoring methods in terms of scoring accuracy and is, on average, within 0.06 QWK of the uninterpretable SOTA across 10 items from the ASAP-SAS dataset. By comparing against human annotators conducting the same featurization task, we further demonstrate that the featurization behavior of AnalyticScore aligns well with that of humans.

Abstract:
Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) always adapts models at inference time via pseudo-labeling, leaving it vulnerable to spurious optimization signals from label noise.Through an empirical study, we observe that responses with medium consistency form an ambiguity region and constitute the primary source of reward noise.Crucially, we find that such spurious signals can be even amplified through group-relative advantage estimation.Motivated by these findings, we propose a unified framework, Debiased and Denoised test-time Reinforcement Learning (DDRL), to mitigate spurious signals.Concretely, DDRL first applies a frequency-based sampling strategy to exclude ambiguous samples while maintaining a balanced set of positive and negative examples.It then adopts a debiased advantage estimation with fixed advantages, removing the bias introduced by group-relative policy optimization.Finally, DDRL incorporates a consensus-based off-policy refinement stage, which leverages the rejection-sampled dataset to enable efficient and stable model updates.Experiments on three large language models across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DDRL consistently outperforms existing TTRL baselines.The code is available at https://github.com/yuyongcan/DDRL.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) is widely applied to boost the performance of pretrained models, yet its training efficiency is severely constrained by rollout generation. While speculative decoding based on multi-token prediction (MTP) offers a potential acceleration pathway, its widespread adoption is hindered by the absence of MTP in vanilla pretrained models and the rapid degradation of the MTP acceptance length in RL training. To address these issues, this paper proposes MTP-RL, a two-stage framework that pioneers effective training of MTPs in RL and accelerates the rollout phase for diverse models. It involves a pipeline to equip the multi-layer parameter-sharing MTP for all models and an innovative advantage-aware MTP optimization strategy to facilitate policy-aligned training of MTPs. Experiments demonstrate that our method not only achieves stable growth of acceptance length during RL training, but also accelerates RL rollouts, achieving an average 23.1%–55.3% reduction in rollout time compared to baselines.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) routing assigns each query to the most suitable model from an ensemble. We introduce LLMRouterBench, a large-scale benchmark and unified framework for LLM routing. It comprises over 400K instances from 21 datasets and 33 models. Moreover, it provides comprehensive metrics for both performance-oriented and performance-cost trade-off routing, and integrates 10 representative routing baselines. Using LLMRouterBench, we systematically re-evaluate the field. While confirming strong model complementarity—the central premise of LLM routing—we find that many routing methods exhibit similar performance under unified evaluation, and several recent approaches, including commercial routers, fail to reliably outperform a simple baseline. Meanwhile, a substantial gap remains to the Oracle, driven primarily by persistent model-recall failures. We further show that backbone embedding models have limited impact, that larger ensembles exhibit diminishing returns compared to careful model curation, and that the benchmark also enables latency-aware analysis. All code and data are available at https://github.com/ynulihao/LLMRouterBench.

Abstract:
Reasoning ability has become a central focus in the advancement of Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). Although notable progress has been achieved on several reasoning benchmarks such as MATH500 and LiveCodeBench, existing benchmarks for algorithmic reasoning remain limited, failing to answer a critical question: Do LRMs truly master algorithmic reasoning? To answer this question, we propose AlgBench, an expert-curated benchmark that evaluates LRMs under an algorithm-centric paradigm.AlgBench consists of over 3,000 original problems spanning 27 algorithms, constructed by ACM algorithmic experts and organized under a comprehensive taxonomy, including Euclidean-structured, non-Euclidean-structured, non-optimized, local-optimized, global-optimized, and heuristic-optimized categories. Empirical evaluations on leading LRMs (e.g., Gemini-3-Pro, DeepSeek-v3.2-Speciale and GPT-o3) reveal substantial performance heterogeneity: while models perform well on non-optimized tasks (up to 92%), accuracy drops sharply to around 49% on globally optimized algorithms such as dynamic programming. Further analysis uncovers strategic over-shifts, wherein models prematurely abandon correct algorithmic designs due to necessary low-entropy tokens. These findings expose fundamental limitations of problem-centric reinforcement learning and highlight the necessity of an algorithm-centric training paradigm for robust algorithmic reasoning.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) serving systems increasingly face strict time-to-first-token (TTFT) service-level objectives (SLOs), yet TTFT remains highly sensitive to router-side queueing effects. Prefill costs scale with prompt length, decode lengths are uncertain, and prefix locality creates strong performance skew across requests. Despite major advances in continuous batching and KV-cache management, today’s routers are often agnostic to request cost, which makes them vulnerable to head-of-line blocking and tail-latency amplification under mixed workloads. We propose QUARTZ , a quantile-aware routing and queueing layer for LLM serving that predicts conservative quantile-based request-cost proxies, rather than point estimates, using lightweight router-visible signals. QUARTZ uses these quantiles together with backlog-aware router signals to guide worker selection and admission decisions that better align with TTFT tail SLOs while preserving fairness. We implement QUARTZ as a router upgrade for SGLang and evaluate it on representative interactive and retrieval-augmented workloads. The results show reductions in TTFT tail latency and SLO violations across heterogeneous workloads.

Abstract:
Generative vision-language models (VLMs) can edit and synthesize images, yet their ability to adapt visual assets across markets remains under-evaluated.We study cross-market image transcreation via movie posters, where localization must preserve a movie’s identity while matching market-specific design preferences and multilingual typography.We introduce the Movie Poster Transcreation Benchmark (MPTc-Bench), a cross-market benchmark of 582 aligned poster examples spanning 34 target markets, and define two task variants: Surface (text-centric localization) and Deep (preference-level style adaptation).We propose a two-stage planner-editor pipeline in which an VLM planner specifies executable edits and an image editor renders them.We evaluate in a triplet setup (source, human target-market poster, model output) using information-preservation checks, LLM-as-a-judge ratings for aesthetics and target-market fit, and objective similarity signals.Across multiple planners and editors, experiments reveal substantial gaps between model outputs and human target-market posters, highlighting open challenges for market-aware generation.MPTc-Bench enables controlled, quantitative progress on cross-market image editing beyond understanding-centric benchmarks.

Abstract:
Knowledge editing aims to efficiently update factual information in Large Language Models (LLMs) without full retraining. However, existing methods still suffer from performance degradation in batch knowledge editing. We identify that semantic representation entanglement, such as overlapping concepts and shared syntactic patterns, accumulates interference in the representation space and reduces editing precision. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose Orthogonal Representation Editing (ORE), which performs edits in the hidden representation space of LLMs by constructing a general semantic subspace and enforcing orthogonal constraints on edit vectors, effectively decoupling semantic entanglement. Furthermore, we introduce a gated non-linear representation head to enable adaptive learning of editing locations and precise control over knowledge injection. Extensive experiments show that ORE outperforms existing methods and achieves superior performance in cross-lingual knowledge editing scenarios. We release our code at https://github.com/YVVH/ORE.

Abstract:
Assessing how well a large language model (LLM) understands human, rather than merely text, remains an open challenge.To bridge the gap, we introduce Sentient Agent as a Judge(SAGE), an automated evaluation framework that measures an LLM’s higher-order social cognition.SAGE instantiates a “Sentient Agent” – an LLM-powered agent that simulates human-like emotional changes and inner thoughts to provide a more realistic evaluation of the tested model in multi-turn conversations.At every turn, the agent reasons about (i) how its emotion changes, (ii) how it feels, and (iii) how it should reply, yielding a numerical emotion trajectory and interpretable inner thoughts.Experiments on 100 supportive-dialogue scenarios show that the final Sentient emotion score correlates strongly with Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (BLRI) ratings and utterance-level empathy metrics, validating psychological fidelity. Human evaluation further demonstrates 85.3% consistency between the agent’s emotional reasoning and human judgments. We also build a public Sentient Leaderboard covering 18 commercial and open-source models that uncovers substantial gaps (up to 4 × ) between frontier systems (GPT-4o-Latest, Gemini2.5-Pro) and earlier baselines, gaps not reflected in conventional leaderboards (e.g. Arena). SAGE thus provides a principled, scalable, and interpretable tool for tracking progress toward genuinely empathetic and socially adept language agents.

Abstract:
Evaluating factual correctness in procedural video captions is challenging because captions must reflect both the abstract procedural roles (e.g., actions, ingredients, tools, locations) and their visual execution. Existing evaluation metrics, which rely on lexical overlap or holistic semantic similarity, often miss role-specific omissions and misclassify visually present but task-irrelevant content as hallucinations. We introduce DualFact+, a role-aware, fact-level evaluation framework that distinguishes conceptual facts, encoding ontology-based role typing of procedural steps (Action, Object or Ingredient, Tool, Location), from contextual facts, encoding video-grounded predicate–argument relations that specify how these roles are instantiated during execution. To enable complete and role-consistent evaluation, DualFact+ incorporates visually grounded implicit arguments and contrastive fact sets, and operates in two complementary modes: DualFact-C for text-based verification and DualFact-V for video-grounded verification. Experiments on YouCook3-Fact and CraftBench-Fact show that state-of-the-art captioning models produce fluent but often incomplete descriptions with systematic role-level errors. DualFact+ achieves stronger correlation with human factuality judgments than standard lexical and embedding-based metrics, highlighting the importance of role-aware evaluation for procedural video understanding.

Abstract:
Advanced chart question answering requires both precise perception of small visual elements and multi-step reasoning across several subplots. While existing MLLMs are strong at understanding single plots, they often struggle with multi-step reasoning across multiple subplots. We propose HierVA, a hierarchical visual agent framework for chart reasoning that iteratively constructs and updates a working context in a joint image–text space. A high-level manager generates plans and maintains a compact context containing only key information, while specialized sub-agents perform reasoning, gather evidence, and return results. In particular, the agent maintains separate visual and textual contexts, using a zoom-in tool to restrict the visual context. Experiments on the chart reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over strong multimodal baselines, and ablation studies verify that hierarchical architecture, limited visual context, and distilled context contribute complementary gains.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs), LLM serving systems remain memory-intensive and costly. The key-value (KV) cache, which stores KV tensors during autoregressive decoding, is crucial for enabling low-latency, high-throughput LLM inference serving. In this survey, we focus on system-aware KV infrastructure for serving LLMs (abbreviated as sKis). We revisit recent work from a system behavior perspective, organizing existing efforts into three dimensions: execution and scheduling (temporal), placement and migration (spatial), and representation and retention (structural). Furthermore, we analyze cross-behavior co-design affinity and behavior-objective links, highlighting future opportunities. Our work systematizes a rapidly evolving area, providing a foundation for understanding and innovating KV cache designs in modern LLM serving infrastructure.

Abstract:
In heterogeneous scientific teams, proactive team agents can serve as effective assistants regarding the research progress of the project. However, proactive agents always suffer from collaborative myopia: a greedy optimization for immediate task accuracy which ignore the long-term goal of team sustainability. This leads to the Individual-centric Trap, where capable experts (e.g., PIs) are disproportionately overloaded while Junior roles remain underutilized. Therefore, neglecting opportunity costs in task allocation can implicitly erodes the enduring performance of the team. To solve this imbalance between efficiency and sustainability, we propose GT-PMARL (Game-Theoretic Proactive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning). By internalizing the opportunity cost as a key consideration in individual decision-making, the collaboration logic of agents has been reshaped. Our framework employs: (1) a Positive-Unlabeled scorer to anchor intervention quality under sparse supervision; (2) a Nash-Pareto competitive objective to seek an equilibrium between individual task excellence and collective load balancing. Empirical experiments in scientific workflows show that GT-PMARL effectively maintains high performance while preventing experts from over-developing. Our work provides a scalable paradigm for building a sustainable and balanced human-AI collaborative ecosystem.

Abstract:
Numerical data from sensors and time series are widely used in scientific research fields such as nuclear fusion experiments, which generate vast amounts of complex, high-dimensional data. Therefore, efficient numerical data analysis tools are crucial to accelerate experimental research. Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as promising solutions to analyze numerical data with natural language queries. However, LLMs have difficulties treating this type of data as they have been designed for text in the first place. To overcome these limitations, we propose a model-agnostic and data-agnostic agent that processes numerical data by code generation and multimodal reasoning. Our agent demonstrates competitive performance against baselines on benchmark data on numerical data tasks such as sensor data classification and time series understanding. While outperforming them on information retrieval benchmarks, also we have successfully applied our agent in the context of nuclear fusion research, where physicists and Tokamak operators interact with it to plan and analyze fusion experiments.

Abstract:
Small language models (SLMs), such as BART, can achieve summarization performance comparable to large language models (LLMs) via distillation. However, existing LLM-based ranking strategies for summary candidates suffer from instability, while classical metrics (e.g., ROUGE) are insufficient to rank high-quality summaries. To address these issues, we introduce SCURank, a framework that enhances summarization by leveraging Summary Content Units (SCUs). Instead of relying on unstable comparisons or surface-level overlap, SCURank evaluates summaries based on the richness and semantic importance of information content. We investigate the effectiveness of SCURank in distilling summaries from multiple diverse LLMs. Experimental results demonstrate that SCURank outperforms traditional metrics and LLM-based ranking methods across evaluation measures and datasets. Furthermore, our findings show that incorporating diverse LLM summaries enhances model abstractiveness and overall distilled model performance, validating the benefits of information-centric ranking in multi-LLM distillation.

Abstract:
Short-form news videos increasingly shape public perception through strategic framing, yet existing verification methods largely overlook the communicative intent underlying such content. By emphasizing surface semantics, current models struggle to separate stylistic presentation from factual evidence, which leads to shortcut learning and brittle generalization. To address this limitation, we propose the Origin–Objective–Means (OOM) framework, a theory-grounded representation of communicative intent that captures creator stance, audience need activation, and communication strategy. We validate OOM through large-scale human annotation, revealing distinct and consistent lexical and structural patterns across intent dimensions. Building on this representation, we operationalize intent as an explicit semantic condition rather than a prediction target. Concretely, we introduce Intent-Guided Prompting (IGP) to condition LLM reasoning and intent-conditioned multimodal detection framework (ICMD), which injects intent into multimodal detectors via feature-wise modulation. Experiments on FakeSV and FakeTT show that modeling intent as an intermediate condition consistently improves accuracy and robustness across diverse vision–language backbones, while substantially reducing reliance on spurious stylistic correlations.

Abstract:
Knowledge about the visual world is not only constantly evolving but also inherently happening all over the world: breaking news in Tokyo, political events in São Paulo, and cultural phenomena in Cairo are first reported in Japanese, Portuguese, and Arabic, carrying regional context that English-centric resources cannot fully capture. Yet existing resources for visual knowledge remain confined to English, creating a "Worldwide Knowledge Gap" that hinders developing truly global assistants. To quantify this gap, we introduce LiveVQA-W(orldwide), the first dynamic-updating dataset for real-time, multilingual visual knowledge seeking and updating across ten major languages. Drawing from worldwide news outlets, YouTube videos, and academic platforms during August–December 2025, LiveVQA-W comprises 234K images, 873K questions, and 171K visual entities with hierarchical evaluation: Level 1 for visual entity recognition and Level 2 for multi-hop cross-lingual reasoning. Our comprehensive benchmarking of 15 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals that models without search achieve near-random performance, while search-augmented models exhibit severe linguistic bias, with English accuracy nearly double that of other languages. Furthermore, we explore visual knowledge updating through large-scale training, finding that injected knowledge improves recall but remains fragile under prompt rephrasing and image perturbations such as rotation and flipping. We release the fully replicable data collection pipeline and raw dataset to support continuous community-driven expansion. The benchmark, code, and related resources are available at: https://worldwide-livevqa.github.io.

Abstract:
Answering open-ended questions remains challenging for AI systems because it requires synthesis, judgment, and exploration beyond factual retrieval, and users often refine answers through multiple iterations rather than accepting a single response. Existing QA benchmarks do not explicitly support this refinement process. To address this gap, we introduce a new task, document-grounded related insight generation, where the goal is to generate additional insights from a document collection that help improve, extend, or rethink an initial answer to an open-ended question, ultimately supporting richer user interaction and a better overall question answering experience. We curate and release SCOpE-QA (Scientific Collections for Open-Ended QA), a dataset of 3,000 open-ended questions across 20 research collections. We present InsightGen, a two-stage approach that first constructs a thematic representation of the document collection using clustering, and then selects related context based on neighborhood selection from the thematic graph to generate diverse and relevant insights using LLMs. Extensive evaluation on 3,000 questions using two generation models and two evaluation settings shows that InsightGen consistently produces useful, relevant, and actionable insights, establishing a strong baseline for this new task.

Abstract:
Approximately 30% of autistic individuals remain non- or minimally-speaking throughout their lives, yet communicate richly through gestures, vocalizations, facial expressions, and augmentative devices. Interpreting this communication is an inherently multimodal task: caregivers rely on the simultaneous integration of visual cues, auditory signals, and contextual understanding to infer intent. Despite this natural alignment with multimodal large language models (MLLMs), research in this intersection remains narrowly focused on diagnosis rather than communication understanding. We address this gap by reframing the problem around two complementary dimensions: communicative actions (the physical modality) and communicative functions (the pragmatic intent). We analyze the ROSCO dataset, containing 2,903 caregiver-annotated video samples from 27 non- and minimally-speaking individuals, with multi-label annotations capturing up to three concurrent actions and two functions per sample across 6 action and 6 function classes. We further propose ROSCO-Omni, a teacher-student distillation framework that generates label-guided instruction data from a high-capability teacher MLLM and uses it to finetune a student MLLM for domain-specialized inference. ROSCO-Omni achieves performance comparable to closed-source models, demonstrating that open-source MLLMs can be adapted to understand communication in this underserved population.

Abstract:
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) has become essential for adapting foundation models to downstream NLP tasks. However, current PEFT methods often struggle with robustness to noise and performance degradation on limited training data. We propose SDBN (Small Data Big Noise), a unified framework that brings adversarial training to PEFT - a combination that remains less studied in the PEFT setting despite its complementary strengths - to enhance model robustness and generalization, outperforming alternative approaches. We also introduce two variants of the method that use discrete uncertainty sets: SDBN-h , which enumerates character-level edits and selects worst-case variants using gradients, and SDBN-p , which uses LLM-generated variants for robust optimization in generative tasks. Experiments across multiple benchmarks reveal substantial improvements, particularly in low-resource settings and under both word-level and character-level corruptions. This framework addresses the less explored intersection of adversarial training and parameter-efficient adaptation, without introducing additional parameters or only modest computational overhead, making PEFT deployments more reliable in real-world scenarios where data scarcity and linguistic variability often coexist.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning from human or AI feedback (RLHF/RLAIF) for speech-in/speech-out dialogue systems (SDS) remains underexplored, with prior work largely limited to single semantic rewards applied at the utterance level. Such setups overlook the multi-dimensional and multi-modal nature of conversational quality, which encompasses semantic coherence, audio naturalness, speaker consistency, emotion alignment, and turn-taking behavior. Moreover, they are fundamentally mismatched with duplex spoken dialogue systems that generate responses incrementally, where agents must make decisions based on partial utterances. We address these limitations with the first multi-reward RLAIF framework for SDS, combining semantic, audio-quality, and emotion-consistency rewards. To align utterance-level preferences with incremental, blockwise decoding in duplex models, we apply turn-level preference sampling and aggregate per-block log-probabilities within a single DPO objective. We present the first systematic study of preference learning for improving SDS quality in both multi-turn Chain-of-Thought and blockwise duplex models, and release a multi-reward DPO dataset to support reproducible research. Experiments show that single-reward RLAIF selectively improves its targeted metric, while joint multi-reward training yields consistent gains across semantic quality and audio naturalness. These results highlight the importance of holistic, multi-reward alignment for practical conversational SDS.

Abstract:
Automatic evaluation of book-length stories remains underexplored, particularly for non-English literature. We introduce ChangJuan, the first benchmark for book-length Chinese story evaluation, comprising 300 novels with metadata, human ratings, and large-scale user reviews. To mitigate the subjectivity of raw reviews, we propose a distillation method to aggregate them into generally agreed viewpoints (pros and cons) across key evaluation aspects such as plot and character. We conduct systematic experiments to benchmark current LLMs, analyze aspect importance, and examine genre differences. For book-length story evaluation, we propose an enhanced summary-based method that leverages length-detail balanced summaries and representative excerpts, generates aspect-specific reviews, and considers genre-aware aspect weighting to assign a final score. Using this framework and our distilled viewpoints, we fine-tune an 8B model, CLEM, which outperforms open-source baselines and raises Qwen3’s Kendall’s tau correlation with human judgments from 24.8 to 34.1. Our datasets and codes are available at https://github.com/DingyiYang/ChangJuan.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated effectiveness as zero-shot time series (TS) forecasters. While existing work often relies on fine-tuning specialized modules to bridge this gap, a distinct, yet challenging, paradigm aims to leverage truly off-the-shelf LLMs without any fine-tuning whatsoever, relying solely on strategic tokenization of numerical sequences. However, the parameters of these fully frozen models cannot adapt to distribution shifts. Thus, we introduce a novel yet highly effective strategy to overcome this brittleness: injecting noise into the raw TS before tokenization. This non-invasive intervention acts as a form of inference-time augmentation, compelling the frozen LLM to extrapolate based on robust underlying temporal patterns rather than superficial numerical artifacts. We theoretically analyze this phenomenon and empirically validate its effectiveness across diverse benchmarks. Notably, to fully eliminate potential biases from data contamination during LLM pre-training, we introduce multiple novel real-world TS datasets that fall outside all utilized LLMs’ pre-training scopes, and consistently observe improved performance. This study provides a further step in directly leveraging off-the-shelf LLMs for TS forecasting[].

Abstract:
Recent Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) integrate acoustic capabilities into reasoning, yet whether they reliably ground clinical judgments in audible evidence remains unproven. We introduce CliniCAST ( Clini cal C ontrolled A coustic S ynthetic T riage), a controlled benchmark that disentangles clinically meaningful acoustic cues from lexical content and speaker demographics. CliniCAST comprises 5 , 856 synthetic samples across 12 disease conditions: 4 , 800 audio samples forming 2 , 400 tagged–untagged pairs for five-level emergency triage, and 1 , 056 audio–text inconsistent samples in which reassuring speech is paired with high-risk acoustic cues. Evaluating a diverse suite of audio-capable foundation models, we find that LALMs exhibit fragile acoustic grounding and a pronounced “text dominance” failure mode: reassuring lexical content suppresses response to audible distress signals even under safety-critical conditions. Age and gender interactions are weak across conditions, indicating that the primary failure mode is insufficient cross-modal integration rather than demographic bias. These results suggest current LALMs are not yet robust enough for high-stakes medical triage, and motivate training objectives that explicitly enforce reliance on clinically grounded audible evidence.

Abstract:
Existing low-resource in-context learning-based knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) methods rely heavily on large language models (LLMs) to convert the natural language question into its corresponding logical form (LF), such as SPARQL, KoPL, etc. Recently, a few alignment techniques have been introduced that enable instruction-based fine-tuning of language models. They provide explicit negative signals and comparative objectives to learn how to avoid negative signals using preference optimization methods. Exploring such fine-tuning techniques with LLMs becomes very challenging due to the high computational resource requirements associated with them. Due to this, the focus has been shifted towards Small Language Models (SLMs), which offer advantages such as ease of (i) deployment for practical applications and (ii) instruction fine-tuning for specialized tasks. Motivated by this, in this work, we propose PO-KGQA: An SLM-based preference optimization framework for the complex KGQA task in a low-resource setting. Our extensive experiments demonstrate how PO-KGQA outperforms other fine-tuning alignment techniques on complex benchmarks such as KQA Pro by approximately 9% (avg).

Abstract:
Language evolution is cognitively motivated by the reduction of communicative effort. Current research exploring this reported tendency has been constrained by the heavy reliance on manually annotated resources (e.g., dependency parsing) as well as a narrow focus (e.g., syntax as the single metric). To transcend these limitations, we propose two measures: Attention-based Structural Distance (ASD) and Semantic Space Distance (SSD). ASD is a parser-free measure of syntactic locality derived from the attention mechanism of pretrained large language models (LLM), while SSD is a measure of lexical distances that quantify the degree of separation between different parts of speech in the word vector space. Based on multiple diachronic and multilingual corpora, our experiments show a significant decrease of ASD while an increase of SSD, which implies a language developmental trend towards structural compactness and semantic divergence. Our research pioneers a novel lens grounded in LLM for studying language evolution, which has two major contributions. Linguistically, our study corroborates the hypothesized law of human language evolution by demonstrating that its development optimizes syntactic locality as well as functional semantic discriminability. Cognitively, our study shows that human and LLMs share common characteristics in language processing, lending support to the potential of employing LLMs in the study of human cognition.

Abstract:
Current code generation evaluation measures functional correctness on well-formed inputs that satisfy all input preconditions. This paradigm has a critical limitation: task descriptions often leave these preconditions implicit, while evaluation filters out inputs that violate them. As a result, generated code may achieve high pass@k scores while failing to enforce the preconditions that the task actually requires. To address this gap, we introduce ContractEval, a benchmark for evaluating whether generated code enforces such preconditions—commonly referred to as contracts. Built on HumanEval+ and MBPP+, ContractEval consists of 364 tasks, each with three components: (i) descriptions reconstructed to explicitly state the contracts, (ii) test cases synthesized through a neuro-symbolic pipeline that pairs an LLM with an SMT solver to evaluate whether generated code satisfies these contracts, and (iii) reference code combined with contracts. Using ContractEval to evaluate five representative open-source code LLMs, we reveal a stark disparity between functional correctness and contract satisfaction. Under standard prompting, these models achieve pass@1 of 75-82% with 0% contract satisfaction. Even when contracts are explicitly stated in the prompt, the satisfaction rate reaches only 23-41%. This indicates that current LLMs struggle to satisfy contracts in their generated code, establishing contract satisfaction as a crucial and previously overlooked axis of code generation quality. Our code is available at https://github.com/suhanmen/ContractEval.

Abstract:
Illustrating figurative language remains challenging due to its non-literal semantics, and existing text-to-image frameworks rely heavily on proprietary models or human supervision to achieve adequate alignment. We introduce CaRVE, a lightweight and fully open-source critique-driven framework that employs VLM feedback to refine visual elaborations for figurative image generation. CaRVE bridges the semantic alignment gap even in sub-4B models by correcting visual and conceptual misalignments, reducing over-literalization, and improving robustness to complex figurative expressions. Using only open-source models, CaRVE achieves a 6.49% improvement over prior baselines on intrinsic automatic evaluations and a +0.37 average rank gain in human preference. We further release MetaCaRVE, an enhanced figurative image dataset constructed by refining HAIVMet using CaRVE.

Abstract:
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results on various tasks. However, these architectures are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, such as GCG and AutoDAN. Several defense strategies have been proposed to protect LLMs from generating harmful content, with most methods focusing on model fine-tuning or heuristic defense designs. These methods are often time-consuming or less effective. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel defense solution by taking the advances of online In-Context Learning (ICL) and an offline defensive suffix. Specifically, we first optimize the offline defensive suffix using an iterative algorithm. Second, an online stochastic random search is conducted to identify the most effective ICL demonstrations. Finally, the original user instruction, the selected ICL demonstrations, and the defensive suffix are assembled into a structured input prompt using a carefully designed template, which is then fed into the LLM for response generation. Experimental results show that our method is effective against both advanced white-box and black-box attacks, reducing the attack success rate to nearly 0%, while maintaining the model’s utility on the benign tasks and incurring only negligible computational overhead. Our code is available on https://github.com/Trusted-LLM/DSICL.

Abstract:
Event Causality Identification (ECI) requires models to determine whether a given pair of events in a context exhibits a causal relationship. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across various NLP tasks, their effectiveness in ECI remains limited due to biases in causal reasoning, often leading to overprediction of causal relationships (causal hallucination). To mitigate these issues and enhance LLM performance in ECI, we propose SERE , a structural example retrieval framework that leverages LLMs’ few-shot learning capabilities. SERE introduces an innovative retrieval mechanism based on three structural concepts: (i) Conceptual Path Metric , which measures the conceptual relationship between events using edit distance in ConceptNet; (ii) Syntactic Metric , which quantifies structural similarity through tree edit distance on syntactic trees; and (iii) Causal Pattern Filtering , which filters examples based on predefined causal structures using LLMs. By integrating these structural retrieval strategies, SERE selects more relevant examples to guide LLMs in causal reasoning, mitigating bias and improving accuracy in ECI tasks. Extensive experiments on multiple ECI datasets validate the effectiveness of SERE .

Abstract:
Hallucinations in Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs) pose significant risks, yet existing detection methods typically rely on gold-standard outputs that are costly or impractical to obtain. Moreover, hallucination detection methods developed for text-based LLMs do not directly capture audio-specific signals. We investigate four attention-derived metrics: AudioRatio, AudioConsistency, AudioEntropy, and TextEntropy, designed to capture pathological attention patterns associated with hallucination, and train lightweight logistic regression classifiers on these features for efficient inference-time detection. Across automatic speech recognition and speech-to-text translation tasks, evaluations on Qwen-2-Audio and Voxtral-3B show that our approach outperforms uncertainty-based and prior attention-based baselines on in-domain data, achieving improvements of up to +0.23 PR-AUC, and generalises to out-of-domain ASR settings. We further find that strong performance can be achieved with approximately 100 attention heads, improving out-of-domain generalisation compared to using all heads. While effectiveness is model-dependent and task-specific training is required, our results demonstrate that attention patterns provide a valuable tool for hallucination detection in SpeechLLMs

Abstract:
Speculative decoding is a widely used technique for accelerating inference in large language models (LLMs), but its performance degrades as input length grows, with significant drops even at moderate lengths. Yet, this early degradation has remained largely underexplored. We introduce SpecExtend, a drop-in enhancement that improves speculative decoding on long sequences without additional training. SpecExtend integrates efficient attention mechanisms such as FlashAttention and Hybrid Tree Attention to accelerate prefill and verification steps. To improve both draft accuracy and speed on long inputs without retraining, we propose Cross-model Retrieval, a novel KV cache eviction strategy that leverages the target model’s attention scores to dynamically select relevant context for the smaller draft model. Extensive evaluations show that SpecExtend accelerates speculative decoding by up to 2.84× on 16K-token long document summarization and up to 3.86× on long-form reasoning, while preserving the short-input performance of state-of-the-art frameworks.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) extends the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing access to external knowledge. However, traditional retrieval-augmented LLMs rely on a silent reading paradigm that processes all retrieved documents passively, forcing them to reason without any interaction with the documents. This paradigm contrasts sharply with human interactive reading behavior, where external tools, such as bookmarks and notes, are used to offload cognitive demands. This paper introduces BubbleRAG, an enhanced RAG framework that emulates human interactive reading through annotation and re-reading. Specifically, BubbleRAG utilizes a lightweight thought bubble module that offloads LLM’s internal cognition into external bookmark tokens, which are then annotated back into the context. These bookmarks serve as externalized memory, allowing the LLM to revisit these annotations in subsequent reading and answering. Notably, BubbleRAG is particularly suitable for low-resource scenarios, as the LLM parameters remain frozen. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness, robustness, and generalizability of BubbleRAG. Our findings demonstrate that BubbleRAG enables LLMs to achieve superior evidence identification abilities typically seen in retrievers, while establishing a cognitive link between external and internal information during answer generation. The source code is available at https://github.com/yefd/BubbleRAG.

Abstract:
This paper introduces a new multi-agent framework, CMTD (Cognitive Modeling with Traits and Distortions), for multimodal emotion recognition in conversations (MERC). Instead of relying on shallow analysis of emotions, CMTD reconstructs a cognitive model by taking advantage of stable personality traits, dynamic cognitive distortions, visual and acoustic features of interlocutors to enhance the emotional intelligence of LLMs. CMTD includes trait, distortion detection, vision, and speech agents that provide psychological and multimodal indicators for the fusion agent to make the final prediction. Experimental results on MELD and IEMOCAP show that traits temper negativity bias from distortions, and cognitive modeling with psychological, visual, and acoustic information can improve the performance of MERC.CMTD is flexible and easy to adapt to advanced emotional AI systems (Github link: https://github.com/Shaun-le/CMTD.git).

Abstract:
Reranking is fundamental to information retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation, with recent Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly advancing reranking quality. Most current works rely on large-scale LLMs (>7B parameters), presenting high computational costs. Small Language Models (SLMs) offer a promising alternative because of computational efficiency. However, our preliminary quantitative analysis reveals key limitations of SLMs: their representation space is narrow, leading to reduced expressiveness, and they struggle with understanding task prompts without fine-tuning. To address these issues, we introduce a novel two-stage training approach, ProRank , for SLM-based document reranking. We propose using reinforcement learning to improve the understanding of task prompts. Additionally, we introduce fine-grained score learning to enhance representation expressiveness and further improve document reranking quality. Extensive experiments suggest that ProRank consistently outperforms both the most advanced open-source and proprietary reranking models. Notably, our ProRank even surpasses powerful LLM reranking models on the BEIR benchmark, establishing that properly trained SLMs can achieve superior document reranking performance while maintaining computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Current large language models (LLMs) often suffer from hallucination issues, i,e, generating content that appears factual but is actually unreliable. A typical hallucination detection pipeline involves response decomposition (i.e., claim extraction), query generation, evidence collection (i.e., search or retrieval), and claim verification. However, existing methods exhibit limitations in the first two stages, such as context loss during claim extraction and low specificity in query generation, resulting in degraded performance across the hallucination detection pipeline. In this work, we introduce JointCQ, a joint claim-and-query generation framework designed to construct an effective and efficient claim-query generator. Our framework leverages elaborately designed evaluation criteria to filter synthesized training data, and finetunes a language model for joint claim extraction and query generation, providing reliable and informative inputs for downstream search and verification. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms previous methods on multiple open-domain QA hallucination detection benchmarks, advancing the goal of more trustworthy and transparent language model systems.

Abstract:
Transformer architecture gradually dominates the LLM field. Recent advances in training optimization for Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) primarily focus on architectural modifications or optimizer adjustments. However, these approaches lack systematic optimization of weight patterns during training. Weight pattern refers to the distribution and relative magnitudes of weight parameters in a neural network. To address this issue, we propose a Weight Scaling method called WISCA to enhance training efficiency and model quality by strategically improving neural network weight patterns—without changing network structures. By rescaling weights while preserving model outputs, WISCA indirectly optimizes the model’s training trajectory. Experiments demonstrate that WISCA significantly improves convergence quality (measured by generalization capability and loss reduction), particularly in LLMs with Grouped Query Attention (GQA) architectures and LoRA fine-tuning tasks. Empirical results show 5.6% average improvement on zero-shot validation tasks and 2.12% average reduction in training perplexity across multiple architectures.

Abstract:
The Mutual Reinforcement Effect (MRE) describes a phenomenon in information extraction where word-level and sentence-level tasks can mutually improve each other when jointly modeled. While prior work has reported MRE in Japanese, its generality across languages and task settings has not been empirically validated, largely due to the lack of multilingual MRE datasets. To address this limitation, we introduce the Multilingual MRE Mix dataset (MMM), which consists of 21 sub-datasets covering English, Japanese, and Chinese. We propose an LLM-assisted dataset translation and alignment framework that significantly reduces manual annotation effort while preserving the structural requirements of MRE tasks. Building on MMM, we adopt a unified input-output framework to train an open-domain information extraction model and conduct extensive empirical studies, including full fine-tuning ablations and the construction of knowledgeable verbalizers based on MRE-mix data. Experimental results show that 76 percent of the MMM sub-datasets consistently exhibit the Mutual Reinforcement Effect across languages. These findings provide systematic empirical validation of MRE in multilingual settings and demonstrate its practical value for information extraction.

Abstract:
Large language models are trained on static corpora but deployed in a dynamic world, leading to systematic temporal failures—from mis-anchored expressions and inconsistent timelines to hallucinated future events, stale world knowledge, and related issues. Existing surveys on temporal knowledge graphs, retrieval-augmented generation, hallucination, and knowledge editing cover only isolated fragments of this space: they are typically task-centric and do not offer a holistic theoretical account of how frozen LLMs represent and reason about time. This survey provides a unified perspective on temporal reasoning in LLMs. We formalize temporal queries in an information-theoretic framework based on the parametric reachability of temporal premises and answers, which induces four temporal information regimes corresponding to internal reasoning, answer recency, premise anchoring, and genuine world indeterminacy. Under this lens, we delineate the landscape of temporal failure modes, consolidate methodologies for diagnosing temporal deficiencies, and synthesize mitigation approaches into a coherent design space. Together, these contributions provide a systematic roadmap toward reliable time-aware large language models.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) demonstrate strong performance on complex tasks but often suffer from excessive verbosity, known as "overthinking." Existing solutions via reinforcement learning (RL) typically penalize generated tokens to promote conciseness. However, these methods encounter two challenges: responses with fewer tokens do not always correspond to fewer reasoning steps, and models may develop hacking behavior in later stages of training by discarding reasoning steps to minimize token usage. In this work, we introduce Step Pruner (SP) , an RL framework that steers LRMs toward more efficient reasoning by favoring compact reasoning steps. Our step-aware reward function prioritizes correctness while imposing penalties for redundant steps, and withholds rewards for incorrect responses to prevent the reinforcement of erroneous reasoning. Moreover, we propose a dynamic stopping mechanism to prevent hacking behavior caused by step merging. Extensive experiments across four reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SP achieves state-of-the-art accuracy while significantly reducing response length. For instance, on AIME24, SP reduces token usage by 69.7% .

Abstract:
Korean is a morphologically rich language with a featural writing system in which each character is systematically composed of subcharacter units known as Jamo. These subcharacters not only determine the visual structure of Korean but also encode frequent and linguistically meaningful morphophonological processes. However, most current Korean language models (LMs) are based on subword tokenization schemes, which are not explicitly designed to capture the internal compositional structure of characters. To address this limitation, we propose SCRIPT , a model-agnostic module that injects subcharacter compositional knowledge into Korean PLMs. SCRIPT allows to enhance subword embeddings with structural granularity, without requiring architectural changes or additional pre-training.As a result, SCRIPT consistently enhances all baselines across various Korean natural language understanding (NLU) and generation (NLG) tasks. Moreover, beyond performance gains, detailed linguistic analyses show that SCRIPT reshapes the embedding space in a way that better captures grammatical regularities and semantically cohesive variations. Our code is available at [https://github.com/SungHo3268/SCRIPT](https://github.com/SungHo3268/SCRIPT).

Abstract:
Treating random masking as a performance plug-in for large language models (LLMs) offers three advantages: low coupling to the task, the model, and training resources. However, the critical drawback is that its gains are highly stochastic. Motivated by this, we propose play-it-by-ear masking performance plug-in (PibE-MPP), which enables LLMs to adaptively select masking target combinations for each task, retaining these advantages and mitigating the drawback. Specifically, we pose two core questions—what are the masking targets and what is the masking strategy under 7 constraints obtained from these advantages and a drawback. For the first question, we select all attention heads in the last layer as masking targets by constructing a first-order Markov process with alternating hidden state and information fusion. The feasibility of this target is validated by random masking experiments. For the second question, we first construct a small yet interpretable candidate set by proposing a three-axis mapping and a mean-based criterion for fusion features of masking targets. We then propose an axis-variance minimization to select a compact masking-target combination, reducing sensitivity to outlier targets. Experiments on 6 LLMs (Qwen and LLaMA) and 24 datasets demonstrate PibE-MPP’s effectiveness and generality, gain stability, and domain performance, and verify the necessity of its final module, providing empirical evidence of its transferability across tasks and models. The code is available at https://github.com/wtctcop/PibE-MPP.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into real-world decision-making, including in the domain of public policy. Yet, their ability to comprehend and reason about policy-related content remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we present PolicyBench, the first large-scale bilingual benchmark evaluating policy comprehension, comprising 21K cases across a broad spectrum of policy areas, capturing the diversity and complexity of real-world governance. Following Bloom’s taxonomy, the benchmark assesses three core capabilities: (1) Memorization: factual recall of policy knowledge, (2) Understanding: conceptual and contextual reasoning, and (3) Application: problem-solving in real-life policy scenarios. Building on this benchmark, we further propose PolicyMoE, a domain-specialized Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model with expert modules aligned to each cognitive level. The proposed models demonstrate stronger performance on application-oriented policy tasks than on memorization or conceptual understanding, and yields the highest accuracy on structured reasoning tasks. Our results reveal key limitations of current LLMs in policy understanding and suggest paths toward more reliable, policy-focused models

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to screen and rank job applicants, creating incentives for candidates to strategically manipulate algorithmic hiring systems. We study prompt injection in automated résumé screening, defined as subtle self-promotional text that introduces no new qualifications but is designed to influence LLM evaluations. Using controlled experiments, we show that prompt injection reliably improves applicant rankings when résumé quality is homogeneous and few candidates inject. However, its effectiveness rapidly diminishes as more candidates inject, collapsing when manipulation becomes widespread. When candidate quality is heterogeneous, prompt injection is less effective on average, but can occasionally allow lower-quality candidates to outrank higher-quality ones, raising fairness concerns. Overall, LLM-based screening is most vulnerable when manipulation is rare and candidate quality differences are small.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL). However, such methods require extensive data and compute, making them impractical under many realistic training budgets. Many existing pipelines sample training examples uniformly across steps or epochs, ignoring differences in difficulty, redundancy, and learning value, which slows learning and wastes computation. We propose SPaCe, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained through optimizing which data to use and when. First, we apply cluster-based data reduction to partition training data by semantics and difficulty, extracting a compact yet diverse subset that reduces redundancy. Then, a multi-armed bandit treats data clusters as arms, allocating training samples based on the model’s solve rates and learning progress. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks show that SPaCe achieves comparable or better accuracy than state-of-the-art baselines while using up to (100 times) fewer samples. Ablation studies and analyses further highlight the importance of both data clustering and adaptive selection. Our results demonstrate that carefully curated, performance-driven training curricula can unlock strong reasoning abilities in LLMs with minimal resources.

Abstract:
Medical large vision-language Models (Med-LVLMs) have shown promise in clinical applications but suffer from factual inaccuracies and unreliable outputs, posing risks in real-world diagnostics. While RAG has emerged as a potential solution, current medical multimodal RAG systems are unable to perform effective retrieval across heterogeneous sources. The irrelevance of retrieved reports undermines the factuality of analysis, while insufficient knowledge affects the credibility of clinical decision-making. To bridge the research gap, we construct MedAtlas, which includes extensive multimodal report repositories and diverse text corpora. Based on it, we present HeteroRAG, a novel framework that enhances Med-LVLMs through heterogeneous knowledge sources. The framework introduces Modality-specific CLIPs for effective report retrieval and a Multi-corpora Query Generator for tailoring queries to diverse corpora. Incorporating knowledge from such multifaceted sources, Heterogeneous Knowledge Preference Tuning is performed to achieve cross-modality and multi-source knowledge alignment. Extensive experiments across 11 datasets and 3 modalities demonstrate that HeteroRAG achieves state-of-the-art performance in most medical vision language benchmarks, significantly improving factual accuracy and reliability of Med-LVLMs.

Abstract:
Existing frameworks remain trapped in a passive and mechanical approach in constructing knowledge structure, which only allows them to uncover superficial associations between chunks while lacking proactive exploration of deeper semantic relationships among them. To address the aforementioned issues, we propose Momoka-RAG (MCTS-Organized Mapping of Knowledge Associations for Long-Document Retrieval Augmented Generation). It employs the Momoka-Map to utilize Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to proactively uncover connections among chunks and construct optimal semantic information paths with the objective of completing semantic relationships. On this basis, the Momoka-Trail Retriever further expands and filters the chunk candidate pool to retrieve the chunks most relevant to the query. Experiments on datasets including Dragonball, SQUAD, NFCORPUS, SCI-DOCS, HotpotQA, and TriviaQA demonstrate that for long-document retrieval tasks, our framework achieves higher precision while maintaining competitive recall compared to other RAG frameworks.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) benefit from generating intermediate reasoning steps, enabling more reliable and interpretable decision-making. While outcome-based supervision has proven effective for LRMs across diverse tasks, it focuses solely on final answers and cannot guarantee high-quality intermediate reasoning. In contrast, existing process supervision is largely limited to verifiable domains such as mathematics or code, where intermediate steps can be explicitly checked, restricting its applicability to open-ended reasoning tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Rubrics-in-Thinking Reinforcement Learning (RiT), the first framework to introduce thinking-rubric supervision into intermediate reasoning. RiT automatically generates fine-grained rubrics and integrates them into a reward function via gated fusion with outcome-based rewards, guiding models to reason in a coherent and task-aligned manner, improving both intermediate steps and the final response. Experiments on reasoning-intensive and open-ended benchmarks demonstrate that RiT consistently outperforms outcome-only RL baselines.

Abstract:
Optimizing communication topology in LLM–based multi-agent system is critical for enabling collective intelligence. Existing methods mainly rely on spatio-temporal interaction paradigms, where the sequential execution of multi-round dialogues incurs high latency and computation. Motivated by the recent insights that evaluation and debate mechanisms can improve problem-solving in multi-agent systems, we propose TopoDIM, a framework for one-shot Topology generation with Diverse Interaction Modes. Designed for decentralized execution to enhance adaptability and privacy, TopoDIM enables agents to autonomously construct heterogeneous communication without iterative coordination, achieving token efficiency and improved task performance. Experiments demonstrate that TopoDIM reduces total token consumption by 46.41% while improving average performance by 1.50% over state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, the framework exhibits strong adaptability in organizing communication among heterogeneous agents. Code is available at: https://github.com/Sundiasy/TopoDIM.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on many code-related tasks, yet they still struggle with repository-level scenarios where reasoning depends on long, noisy, and structurally complex contexts. While existing retrieval methods, including both similarity-based and graph-based approaches, can identify relevant code snippets, they often retrieve excessive contexts that intensify the "lost-in-the-middle" phenomenon and dilute model attention with redundant contexts. To address this, we present RepoDistill, a novel framework that integrates retrieval with learned budget allocation for fine-grained context compression. RepoDistill first employs a plug-and-play lightweight GraphRAG to retrieve context that follows logical flows. It then applies Compression-Aware Budget Allocation guided by Compression-Aware Policy Optimization, which formulates context management as a multi-step decision problem and learns allocation policies for contexts. Experiments show that RepoDistill outperforms baselines, achieving gains of up to +7.00 on SWE-QA, +24.4% on CoderEval, and +0.25 on LongCodeU. Furthermore, a compact 4B-parameter model trained with RepoDistill can serve as an effective context compressor for closed-source LLMs, reducing input tokens by up to 66% while maintaining comparable performance. We release our code at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/RepoDistill-12B0.

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves reasoning but often produces long and redundant traces that substantially increase inference cost. We present SyncThink, a training-free and plug-and-play decoding method that reduces CoT overhead without modifying model weights. We find that answer tokens attend weakly to early reasoning and focus on ‘‘, indicating an information bottleneck.Building on this observation, SyncThink monitors the model’s own reasoning-transition signal and terminates reasoning. Experiments on GSM8K, MMLU, GPQA, and BBH across three DeepSeek-R1 distilled models show that SyncThink achieves 62.00% average Top@1 accuracy using 656 generated tokens and 28.68s latency, compared to 61.22%, 2141 tokens, and 92.01s for full CoT decoding. On long-horizon tasks such as GPQA, SyncThink can further yield up to +8.1 absolute accuracy by preventing over-thinking.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning for Large Language Model agents is often hindered by sparse rewards in multi-step reasoning tasks. Existing approaches like Group Relative Policy Optimization treat sampled trajectories as independent chains, assigning uniform credit to all steps in each chain and ignoring the existence of critical steps that may disproportionally impact reasoning outcome. In this paper, we propose T-STAR(Tree-structured Self-Taught Agent Rectification), a framework that recovers the latent correlated reward structure across seemingly independent trajectories. Specifically, we consolidate trajectories into a unified Cognitive Tree by identifying and merging functionally similar steps/nodes. It enables an Introspective Valuation mechanism that back-propagates trajectory-level rewards through the tree to obtain a new notion of variance-reduced relative advantage at step-level. Using the Cognitive Tree, we also develop In-Context Thought Grafting to synthesize corrective reasoning by contrasting successful and failed branches at critical divergence points/steps. Our proposed Surgical Policy Optimization then capitalizes on the rich policy gradient information concentrated at these critical points/steps through a Bradley-Terry type of surgical loss. Extensive experiments across embodied, interactive, reasoning, and planning benchmarks demonstrate that T-STAR achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines, with gains most pronounced on tasks requiring extended reasoning chains.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) face challenges in logical reasoning where correctness requires strict deductive procedures. Purely model-based approaches often suffer from hallucinations, while neuro-symbolic methods typically delegate deduction to external solvers, reducing the LLM to a mere translator. To address this, we propose MAC-Reasoner, a multi-agent framework that constructs a Logic-Augmented Context to enhance LLMs’ reasoning. In this framework, a translator agent converts problems into executable symbolic programs. Symbolic information from solver execution is transformed into the Logic-Augmented Context, serving as a verification reference where logical conflicts trigger heightened attention to violated constraints. We evaluate MAC-Reasoner with three backbone LLMs on four challenging benchmarks. Results show consistent and robust improvements over baselines. Furthermore, reasoning traces from MAC-Reasoner can be used for supervised fine-tuning of LLMs to achieve more accurate and efficient logical reasoning.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance, they remain vulnerable to jailbreak. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools via protocols such as the Model Context Protocol (MCP) introduces critical security vulnerabilities, including prompt injection, data exfiltration, and other threats. To counter these challenges, we propose MCP-Guard, a robust, layered defense architecture designed for LLM–tool interactions. MCP-Guard employs a three-stage detection pipeline that balances efficiency with accuracy: it progresses from lightweight static scanning for overt threats and a deep neural detector for semantic attacks, to our fine-tuned E5-based model achieves 96.01% accuracy in identifying adversarial prompts. Finally, an LLM arbitrator synthesizes these signals to deliver the final decision. To enable rigorous training and evaluation, we introduce MCP-AttackBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 70,448 samples augmented by GPT-4. This benchmark simulates diverse real-world attack vectors that circumvent conventional defenses in the MCP paradigm, thereby laying a solid foundation for future research on securing LLM-tool ecosystems.

Abstract:
To be discoverable in an embedding-based search process, each part of a document should be reflected in its embedding representation. To quantify any potential reflection biases, we introduce a permutation-based evaluation framework. With this, we observe that state-of-the-art embedding models exhibit systematic positional and language biases when documents are longer and consist of multiple segments. Specifically, early segments and segments in higher-resource languages like English are over-represented, while later segments and segments in lower-resource languages are marginalized. In our further analysis, we find that the positional bias stems from front-loaded attention distributions in pooling-token embeddings, where early tokens receive more attention. To mitigate this issue, we introduce an inference-time attention calibration method that redistributes attention more evenly across document positions, increasing discoverabiltiy of later segments. Our evaluation framework and attention calibration is available at https://github.com/impresso/fair-sentence-transformers

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong performance, but they often lack transparency. We introduce GeoLAN, a training framework that treats token representations as geometric trajectories and applies stickiness conditions inspired by recent developments related to the Kakeya Conjecture. We have developed two differentiable regularizers, Katz-Tao Convex Wolff (KT-CW) and Katz-Tao Attention (KT-Attn), that promote isotropy and encourage diverse attention. Our experiments with Gemma-3 (1B, 4B, 12B) and Llama-3-8B show that GeoLAN frequently maintains task accuracy while improving geometric metrics and reducing certain fairness biases. These benefits are most significant in mid-sized models. Our findings reveal scale-dependent trade-offs between geometric precision and performance, suggesting that geometry-aware training is a promising approach to enhance mechanistic interpretability.

Abstract:
Code large language models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in programming tasks, yet current benchmarks primarily focus on single modality rather than visual game development. Most existing code-related benchmarks evaluate syntax correctness and execution accuracy, overlooking critical game-specific metrics such as playability, visual aesthetics, and user engagement that are essential for real-world deployment. To address the gap between current LLM capabilities in algorithmic problem-solving and competitive programming versus the comprehensive requirements of practical game development, we present V-GameGym, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 2,219 high-quality samples across 100 thematic clusters derived from real-world repositories, adopting a novel clustering-based curation methodology to ensure both diversity and structural completeness. Further, we introduce a multimodal evaluation framework with an automated LLM-driven pipeline for visual code synthesis using complete UI sandbox environments. Our extensive analysis reveals that V-GameGym effectively bridges the gap between code generation accuracy and practical game development workflows, providing quantifiable quality metrics for visual programming and interactive element generation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly tasked with creative generation, including the simulation of fictional characters. However, their ability to portray non-prosocial, antagonistic personas remains largely unexamined. We hypothesize that the safety alignment of modern LLMs creates a fundamental conflict with the task of authentically role-playing morally ambiguous or villainous characters. To investigate this, we introduce the Moral RolePlay benchmark, a new dataset featuring a four-level moral alignment scale and a balanced test set for rigorous evaluation. We task state-of-the-art LLMs with role-playing characters from moral paragons to pure villains. Our large-scale evaluation reveals a consistent, monotonic decline in role-playing fidelity as character morality decreases. We find that models struggle most with traits directly antithetical to safety principles, such as ”Deceitful” and ”Manipulative”, often substituting nuanced malevolence with superficial aggression. Furthermore, we demonstrate that general chatbot proficiency is a poor predictor of villain role-playing ability, with highly safety-aligned models performing particularly poorly. Our work provides the first systematic evidence of this critical limitation, highlighting a key tension between model safety and creative fidelity. Our benchmark and findings pave the way for developing more nuanced, context-aware alignment methods.

Abstract:
Modern neural language models achieve high accuracy in text generation, yet precise control over generation length remains underdeveloped. In this paper, we first investigate a recent length control method based on Reverse Positional Embeddings (RPE) and show its limits when control is requested beyond the training distribution. In particular, using a discrete countdown signal tied to the absolute remaining token count leads to instability. To provide robust length control, we introduce Progress Ratio Embeddings (PRE), as continuous embeddings tied to a trigonometric impatience signal. PRE integrates seamlessly into standard Transformer architectures, providing stable length fidelity without degrading text accuracy under standard evaluation metrics. We further show that PRE generalizes well to unseen target lengths. Experiments on two widely used news-summarization benchmarks and a popular question generation dataset validate these findings.

Abstract:
Test-time scaling has emerged as a transformative paradigm for enhancing the performance of large reasoning models, enabling dynamic allocation of computational resources during inference. However, as the landscape of reasoning models rapidly expands, a critical question remains: how can we systematically compare and evaluate the test-time scaling capabilities across different models? In this paper, we introduce ARISE (Adaptive Resolution-aware Scaling Evaluation), a novel metric specifically designed to assess the test-time scaling effectiveness of large reasoning models. Unlike existing evaluation approaches, ARISE incorporates two key innovations: (1) sample-level awareness that effectively penalizes negative scaling behaviors where increased computation leads to performance degradation, and (2) a dynamic sampling mechanism that mitigates the impact of accuracy fluctuations and token count instability on the final assessment. We conduct comprehensive experiments evaluating state-of-the-art reasoning models across diverse domains including mathematical reasoning, code generation, and agentic tasks. Our results demonstrate that ARISE provides a reliable and fine-grained measurement of test-time scaling capabilities, revealing significant variations in scaling efficiency across models. Notably, our evaluation identifies Claude Opus as exhibiting superior scaling characteristics compared to other contemporary reasoning models.

Abstract:
The autonomous synthesis of deep research reports represents a critical frontier for Large Language Models (LLMs), demanding sophisticated information orchestration and non-linear narrative logic. Current approaches rely on rigid predefined linear workflows, which cause error accumulation, preclude global restructuring from subsequent insights, and ultimately limit in-depth multimodal fusion and report quality. We propose CogGen, a Cognitively inspired recursive framework for deep research report Generation. Leveraging a Hierarchical Recursive Architecture to simulate cognitive writing, CogGen enables flexible planning and global restructuring. To extend this recursivity to multimodal content, we introduce Abstract Visual Representation (AVR): a concise intent-driven language that iteratively refines visual-text layouts without pixel-level regeneration overhead. We further present CLEF, a Cognitive Load Evaluation Framework, and curate a new benchmark from Our World in Data (OWID). Extensive experiments show CogGen achieves state-of-the-art results among open-source systems, generating reports comparable to professional analysts’ outputs and surpassing Gemini Deep Research. Our code and dataset will be publicly available upon publication.

Abstract:
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enhances code generation in Large Language Models (LLMs), it introduces a critical challenge in uncertainty estimation: Confidence Saturation. Existing calibration methods, such as Self-Consistency, rely on the assumption that consensus implies correctness. This assumption fails under systematic errors, where models confidently repeat flawed logic, leading to miscalibrated high-confidence predictions. To address this, we introduce NeuroSym-Cal, a hierarchical calibration framework. We posit that reliable confidence requires interrogating the model at two complementary levels: the extrinsic consensus of its symbolic outputs and the intrinsic sensitivity of its latent reasoning. Specifically, we propose Reasoning Sensitivity Analysis to measure the local curvature of the deductive process via latent perturbation, providing a fine-grained signal that persists even when output consensus saturates. These orthogonal features are fused by a Contextual Calibration Network to predict correctness. Experiments across state-of-the-art reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) demonstrate that NeuroSym-Cal effectively de-saturates overconfident errors, achieving state-of-the-art Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and superior selective generation performance on Out-Of-Domain (OOD) benchmarks.

Abstract:
A practical approach to activate long chain-of-thoughts reasoning ability in large language models is to perform supervised fine-tuning on instruction datasets synthesized by strong large reasoning models, offering a cost-effective alternative to reinforcement learning. However, large-scale instruction sets incur significant training overhead, while effective strategies for automatic data selection still remain unexplored. We propose Select2Reason, a novel and efficient instruction-tuning data selection framework for long-CoT reasoning. From the perspective of emergence of rethinking behaviors like self-correction and backtracking, we investigate metrics that may determine the quality of long-CoT instructions. Select2Reason leverages a difficulty-aware reward model to estimate the learning value of questions and jointly incorporates a reasoning trace length-based heuristic through a weighted scheme for ranking to prioritize high-utility examples. Empirical results on OpenR1-Math-220k demonstrate that fine-tuning LLM on only 10% of the data selected by our method achieves performance competitive with or superior to full-data tuning and open-source baseline across nine competition-level mathematical benchmarks and four broader reasoning tasks. Further experiments highlight the scalability in varying data size, efficiency during inference, and adaptability to other instruction pools of Select2Reason with minimal cost.

Abstract:
Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems represent a promising paradigm for tackling complex problems through agent collaboration. However, the reliance on open-ended communication exposes a fundamental vulnerability: the collaborative process itself can be exploited and disrupted. In this work, we formalize this threat class as Denial-of-Collaboration (DoC). Unlike DoS, which targets individual nodes or services, DoC attacks corrupt the collaborative structure of the system, transforming its communication topology into self-sabotage. The result is excessive resource consumption and eventual system paralysis. We introduce COntagious Recursive Blocking Attacks (CORBA) as a concrete example of DoC, which employs benign yet recursively contagious instructions, forcing LLM-MASs into cycles of meaningless message passing. Critically, since our attacks are semantically benign, they easily bypass conventional safety alignments that are not designed to detect behavioral or systemic attacks. Through extensive experiments across diverse topologies and models, we demonstrate that CORBA achieves system paralysis where the baseline attacks fail. Our work reveals emerging DoC threats in current LLM-MAS security and establishes a crucial baseline for developing robust, collaboration-aware defense mechanisms.

Abstract:
Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) struggle with the heavy computational cost of long or high-resolution videos due to massive visual token counts and the quadratic complexity of attention. Prior pruning approaches mainly rely on token importance or similarity, while largely overlooking video dynamics and the fact that different scenes exhibit different redundancy patterns. We introduce MoPrune, a training-free, scene-guided and motion-centric token pruning framework for accelerating VideoLLMs. MoPrune first segments videos into semantically coherent scenes to preserve temporal and motion consistency. Within each scene, it determines frame retention rates from intra-scene frame uniqueness. Finally, at the token level, MoPrune retains visually distinctive tokens and motion-salient tokens via a unified score, preserving both informative static details and dynamic regions. Extensive experiments across multiple VideoLLMs and public benchmarks demonstrate MoPrune’s superior efficiency–performance trade-offs. On LLaVA-OneVision, retaining 25% of visual tokens matches or slightly improves the dense baseline, and retaining 15% tokens preserves 99% of the original performance. MoPrune is fully compatible with hardware-efficient techniques such as Flash Attention.

Abstract:
As synthetic data becomes widely used in language model development, understanding its impact on model behavior is crucial. This paper investigates the impact of the diversity of sources of synthetic data on fine-tuned large language models. We focus on three key dimensions: distribution collapse, adversarial robustness, and self-preference bias. Our findings reveal that fine-tuning models on synthetic data from diverse sources can mitigate distribution collapse, preserving the breadth of the output distribution and the diversity of the output text. Furthermore, while both human and synthetic fine-tuning data can remove safeguards, we observe a tendency for higher output quality in the latter case, thus making outputs potentially more usable and dangerous. Finally, we also find evidence that fine-tuning reduces self-preference bias, with human data being the most effective, followed by multi-source synthetic data. All code is available at https://github.com/maxschaffelder/synthetic_data_diversity.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) augmented with multi-step reasoning and action generation abilities have shown promise in leveraging external tools to tackle complex tasks that require long-horizon planning. However, existing approaches either rely on implicit planning in the reasoning stage or introduce explicit planners without systematically addressing how to optimize the planning stage. As evidence, we observe that under vanilla reinforcement learning (RL), planning tokens exhibit significantly higher entropy than other action tokens, revealing uncertain decision points that remain under-optimized. To address this, we introduce DeepPlanner, an end-to-end RL framework that effectively enhances the planning capabilities of deep research agents. Our approach shapes token-level advantage with an entropy-based term to allocate larger updates to high entropy tokens, and selectively upweights sample-level advantages for planning-intensive rollouts. Extensive experiments across seven deep research benchmarks demonstrate that DeepPlanner improves planning quality and achieves state-of-the-art results under a substantially lower training budget.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) promise impressive capabilities, yet their multi-billion parameter scale makes on-device or low-resource deployment prohibitive. Mixed precision quantization offers a compelling solution, but existing methods struggle when the average precision drops below four bits, as they rely on isolated, layer-specific metrics that overlook critical inter-layer interactions affecting overall performance. To address these limitations, we first frame the mixed-precision quantization problem as a cooperative game among layers and introduce Shapley-based Progressive Quantization Estimation (SPQE) to efficiently obtain accurate Shapley estimates of layer sensitivities and inter-layer interactions. Leveraging the SPQE estimates, we propose Cooperative Game Inspired Mixed-Precision Quantization (CoopQ) which translates these Shapley estimates into a binary quadratic optimization formulation, assigning either 2 or 4-bit precision to layers under strict memory constraints. Comprehensive experiments conducted on Llama-3, Gemma-2, and Qwen models across three independent PTQ backends (Quanto, HQQ, GPTQ) demonstrate CoopQ’s scalability and consistently superior performance compared to methods relying solely on isolated metrics. Across average precisions spanning 4 bit down to 2 bit, CoopQ cuts Perplexity by 20 – 80 % relative to the best baseline, with the margin growing as the bit-width tightens.

Abstract:
Automated scoring models are increasingly used to assign rubric-based quality ratings to complex language performances, including classroom transcripts, yet they typically provide little insight into why a particular score is produced. We propose a general framework for sentence-level interpretability of rubric-based scoring that combines model-agnostic Shapley-value attributions with rationales generated by large language models (LLMs). Instantiated on the Quality of Feedback dimension of the CLASS framework using the NCTE corpus, the framework enables systematic comparison of fine-tuned pretrained language models (PLMs) and prompted LLMs on both scoring performance and explanation faithfulness. Across 6k annotated transcript segments, fine-tuned PLMs outperform LLMs in prediction accuracy but exhibit label compression toward mid-scale scores. Deletion-based tests show that SHAP identifies sentences that reliably drive model predictions, producing typically larger and more coherent prediction shifts than LLM-generated rationales. Cross-model analyses further reveal that SHAP attributions transfer robustly across architectures, whereas LLM rationales exert limited and inconsistent influence. Overall, the findings demonstrate that SHAP provides more faithful and transferable explanations for rubric-based scoring, and that the proposed framework offers a principled basis for evaluating both scoring models and their explanations in high-stakes educational settings and other rubric-based language assessment tasks.

Abstract:
The quadratic complexity of the attention mechanism and the substantial memory footprint of the Key-Value (KV) cache present severe computational and memory challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs) processing long contexts. Existing retrieval-based methods often compromise semantic integrity through fixed-size chunking and suffer from inefficient linear scanning. In this paper, we propose LycheeCluster, a novel method for efficient KV cache management. LycheeCluster preserves local semantic coherence via boundary-aware chunking and constructs a recursive hierarchical index rooted in the triangle inequality. This design transforms cache retrieval from a linear scan into a theoretically bounded, logarithmic-time pruning process, while a lazy update strategy supports efficient streaming generation. Experiments demonstrate that LycheeCluster achieves up to a 3.6 × end-to-end inference speedup with negligible degradation in model performance, outperforming state-of-the-art KV cache management methods (e.g., Quest, ClusterKV).

Abstract:
With reasoning becoming the generative paradigm for large language models, the memory bottleneck caused by KV cache during the inference phase has become a critical factor limiting high-concurrency service capabilities. Although existing KV cache eviction methods address the memory issue, most of them are impractical for industrial-grade applications. This paper introduces Compressed PagedAttention, a method that combines token-wise KV cache eviction with PagedAttention. We propose a comprehensive scheduling strategy and support prefix caching and asynchronous compression for Compressed PagedAttention. Based on this, we have developed a high-concurrency inference engine, Zipage. On large-scale mathematical reasoning tasks, Zipage achieves around 95% of the performance of Full KV inference engines while delivering over 2.1 speedup.

Abstract:
Dense retrievers in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems exhibit systematic biases—including brevity, position, literal matching, and repetition biases—that can compromise retrieval quality. Query rewriting techniques are now standard in RAG pipelines, yet their impact on these biases remains unexplored. We present the first systematic study of how query enhancement techniques affect dense retrieval biases, evaluating five methods across six retrievers. Our findings reveal that simple LLM-based rewriting achieves the strongest aggregate bias reduction (54%), yet fails under adversarial conditions where multiple biases combine. Mechanistic analysis uncovers two distinct mechanisms: simple rewriting reduces bias through increased score variance, while pseudo-document methods achieve reduction through genuine decorrelation from bias-inducing features. However, no technique uniformly addresses all biases, and effects vary substantially across retrievers. Our results provide practical guidance for selecting query enhancement strategies based on specific bias vulnerabilities. More broadly, we establish a taxonomy distinguishing query-document interaction biases from document encoding biases, clarifying the limits of query-side interventions for debiasing RAG systems.

Abstract:
Large language models exhibit significant potential for psychological support, yet they often generate fragmented and emotionally inconsistent dialogues that lack the therapeutic structure necessary for reliable assessment.To address these issues, we introduce VeilEval, a clinically grounded and privacy-preserving benchmark equipped with interpretable metrics for evaluating multi-turn psychological dialogues.Furthermore, we propose Emotion-Resonance (EmoRes), a multi-agent framework that boosts psychological reasoning via a Topic-Mining Emotional Agent and a multi-perspective Self-Reflection Agent, thereby jointly improving topic continuity, emotional coherence, and clinical interpretability.Experiments demonstrate that EmoRes achieves up to ∼ 3× improvement over strong baselines on VeilEval, with its effectiveness further validated by ablation studies and human evaluations.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in code intelligence tasks such as code generation, summarization, and translation. However, their reliance on linearized token sequences makes them brittle to long-range program dependencies and superficial lexical shifts such as identifier renaming. Existing structure-aware approaches typically treat structure as serialized text prompts or auxiliary training objectives, which often inflate context length or rely on internalized structural priors, failing to provide explicit guidance during inference. To address these limitations, we propose CGBridge, a novel plug-and-play method that enhances LLMs with Code Graph information through an external, trainable Bridge module. It aligns Code Property Graph structure with code semantics and compresses them into compact soft-prefixes, decoupling structural reasoning from textual generation without updating the backbone. Experiments across multiple code LLM backbones and scales show consistent gains over both text-only adaptation and graph-augmented baselines. Furthermore, CGBridge remains robust under identifier renaming and enables over 4× faster inference than LoRA-tuned models, demonstrating both effectiveness and efficiency in structure-aware code understanding.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently achieved impressive results on multiple-choice question answering (MCQA), with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) emerging as an effective strategy for improving the performance of smaller models. However, existing RAG formulations face persistent challenges: retrieving too many passages often introduces noise, and even when relevant content is retrieved, models may still struggle with partially relevant or conflicting information. Moreover, while LLMs perform strongly on English benchmarks, their accuracy declines substantially on Arabic multi-task evaluations, revealing ongoing issues in cross-lingual transfer and domain adaptation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach, using Arabic as a representative case study, that jointly models the relevance of both the question and its candidate answers when selecting contextual passages. The method employs a lightweight reranker trained with a hybrid regression–triplet loss objective to identify passages that provide discriminative and reliable evidence. Extensive experiments across multiple model sizes and humanities domains show that our approach consistently outperforms both standard RAG baselines and reranker baselines, delivering two- to threefold improvements while remaining competitive with considerably larger models.

Abstract:
The widespread dissemination of toxic content on online platforms poses a critical threat to user experience. Toxicity detection in speech receives significantly less research attention than its text counterpart. Most existing methods rely on high-resource languages and employ a cascaded pipeline combining automatic speech recognition (ASR) and text classifiers. These designs limit robustness in low-resource languages and discard important acoustic cues. To address the lack of datasets, we construct PolySpeechTox, the first toxicity-annotated speech dataset spanning 53 languages and accent varieties, with a focus on low-resource languages and multiple accents. Based on PolySpeechTox, we conduct the first systematic study of toxic speech detection under low-resource, multilingual, and multi-accent conditions. We propose SoftPrompt-TSD, a prompt-based adaptation framework that leverages a frozen audio language model to perform end-to-end toxicity detection without ASR. The decomposed soft-prompt design balances global task alignment, cross-lingual generalization, and language-specific or accent-specific calibration. On PolySpeechTox, SoftPrompt-TSD achieves a micro-averaged ROC-AUC of 98.07%, mitigating the severe failures observed in baseline methods for several languages. In three generalization experiments, SoftPrompt-TSD demonstrates superior generalization capability and maintains robust performance against distribution shifts.

Abstract:
The advancement of Multimodal Emotion Recognition (MER) in Chinese is significantly hindered by the scarcity of high-quality, spontaneous dialogue datasets compared to their English counterparts. In this work, we introduce EmotionTalk, the first interactive Chinese multimodal dataset designed to capture the nuance of authentic emotional interplay. Collected from 19 professional actors, the dataset spans 23.6 hours of dyadic conversations across diverse scenarios. A key contribution of EmotionTalk is its multi-grained annotation system, which integrates standard categorical and dimensional labels with fine-grained emotional speaking style captions, enabling research into interpretable emotion analysis. We establish comprehensive benchmarks for emotion recognition and captioning tasks, verifying the dataset’s effectiveness and the necessity of multimodal fusion. EmotionTalk serves as a critical resource for bridging the gap in non-English affective computing and is publicly released for the research community.

Abstract:
Both humans and large language models (LLMs) exhibit content effects: biases in which the plausibility of the semantic content of a reasoning problem influences judgments regarding its logical validity. While this phenomenon in humans is best explained by the dual-process theory of reasoning, the mechanisms behind content effects in LLMs remain unclear. In this work, we address this issue by investigating how LLMs encode the concepts of validity and plausibility within their internal representations. We show that both concepts are linearly represented and strongly aligned in representational geometry, leading models to conflate plausibility with validity. Using steering vectors, we demonstrate that plausibility vectors can causally bias validity judgements, and vice versa, and that the degree of alignment between these two concepts predicts the magnitude of behavioral content effects across models. Finally, we construct debiasing vectors that disentangle these concepts, reducing content effects and improving reasoning accuracy. Our findings advance understanding of how abstract logical concepts are represented in LLMs and highlight representational interventions as a path toward more logical systems.

Abstract:
While Large Language Model (LLM) agents show promise in automated trading, they still face critical limitations. Prominent multi-agent frameworks often suffer from inefficiency, produce inconsistent signals, and lack the end-to-end optimization required to learn a coherent strategy from market feedback. To address this, we introduce AlphaQuanter, a single-agent framework that uses reinforcement learning (RL) to learn a dynamic policy over a transparent, tool-augmented decision workflow, which empowers a single agent to autonomously orchestrate tools and proactively acquire information on demand, establishing a transparent reasoning process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AlphaQuanter achieves state-of-the-art performance on key financial metrics. Besides, human evaluation shows the learned reasoning patterns reveal more faithful and coherent tool-usage behaviors, providing steps toward verifiable LLM-driven trading. Our code and data can be found at https://github.com/horizon-llm/AlphaQuanter.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit cultural biases, yet existing benchmarks rely on closed-form, domain-specific questionnaires. We introduce FRAMENET-CULTURES, a benchmark for evaluating cultural alignment in LLMs based on Fillmore-style frame semantics. Using the EveryCulture encyclopedia, we construct a lexicon of 18 cultural frames (e.g., greeting,child-rearing) across 20 countries, treating it as a structured reference for comparison rather than a definitive representation of contemporary societies. For each frame, we prompt five major LLMs—ChatGPT-5, Gemini-2.5-Flash, Mistral-Large, Qwen-3-Max, DeepSeek-V3.2—three times to generate open-ended instantiations, which are manually annotated and binarized. We measure alignment with country- and continent-level profiles using normalized Hamming distance, and validate cultural recognizability through human evaluation of generated dialogues. Under culture-neutral prompting, outputs align most closely with European profiles, followed by Asian and American ones, indicating a consistent cross-model pattern. With culture-specific prompting, models shift toward the target regions, aligning most strongly with Africa for Ethiopia and with Asia for India. FRAMENET-CULTURES is the first open-ended benchmark for cultural alignment relying on frame semantics. Data, prompts, and annotations are publicly available at https://github.com/neda-jamshidi/FrameNet-Cultures.

Abstract:
Understanding scientific papers requires more than answering isolated questions or summarizing content. It involves an integrated reasoning process that grounds textual and visual information, interprets experimental evidence, synthesizes information across sources, and critically evaluates scientific claims. However, existing benchmarks typically assess these abilities in isolation, making it difficult to evaluate scientific paper understanding as a unified set of interacting cognitive abilities. In this work, we introduce PaperMind , a benchmark designed to evaluate integrated and agent-oriented scientific reasoning over research papers. PaperMind is constructed from real scientific papers across seven domains, including agriculture, biology, chemistry, computer science, medicine, physics, and economics. It comprises four complementary task families that collectively operationalize distinct cognitive facets of scientific paper reasoning, including multimodal grounding, experimental interpretation, cross-source evidence reasoning, and critical assessment. By analyzing model behavior across multiple tasks, PaperMind enables a diagnostic evaluation of integrated scientific reasoning behaviors that are difficult to assess through isolated task evaluations. Extensive experiments on both open-source and closed-source multimodal LLMs reveal consistent performance gaps across tasks, highlighting persistent challenges in integrated scientific reasoning and critique. Our benchmark and dataset are available at https://github.com/Yanjun-Zhao/PaperMind.

Abstract:
Evaluations of LLMs’ ethical risks and value inclinations often rely on short-form surveys and psychometric tests, yet real-world use involves long-form, open-ended responses—leaving value-related risks and preferences in practical settings largely underexplored. In this work, we ask: Do value preferences inferred from short-form tests align with those expressed in long-form outputs? To address this question, we compare value preferences elicited from short-form reactions and long-form responses, varying the number of arguments in the latter to capture users’ differing verbosity preferences. Analyzing five LLMs (llama3-8b, gemma2-9b, mistral-7b, qwen2-7b, and olmo-7b), we find (1) a weak correlation between value preferences inferred from short-form and long-form responses across varying argument counts, and (2) similarly weak correlation between preferences derived from any two distinct long-form generation settings. (3 Alignment yields only modest gains in the consistency of value expression. Further, we examine how long-form generation attributes relate to value preferences, finding that argument specificity negatively correlates with preference strength, while representation across scenarios shows a positive correlation. Our findings underscore the need for more robust methods to ensure consistent value expression across diverse applications.

Abstract:
Electronic health record (EHR) question answering is often handled by LLM-based pipelines that are costly to deploy and do not explicitly leverage the hierarchical structure of clinical data. Motivated by evidence that medical ontologies and patient trajectories exhibit hyperbolic geometry, we propose HypEHR, a compact Lorentzian model that embeds codes, visits, and questions in hyperbolic space and answers queries via geometry-consistent cross-attention with type-specific pointer heads. HypEHR is pretrained with next-visit diagnosis prediction and hierarchy-aware regularization to align representations with the ICD ontology. On two MIMIC-IV-based EHR-QA benchmarks, HypEHR approaches LLM-based methods while using far fewer parameters. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/yuyuliu11037/HypEHR .

Abstract:
Self-supervised speech models (S3Ms) are known to encode rich phonetic information, yet how this information is structured remains underexplored. We conduct a comprehensive study across 96 languages to analyze the underlying structure of S3M representations, with particular attention to phonological vectors.We first show that there exist linear directions within the model’s representation space that correspond to phonological features. We further demonstrate that the scale of these phonological vectors correlate to the degree of acoustic realization of their corresponding phonological features in a continuous manner. For example, the difference between [d] and [t] yields a voicing vector: adding this vector to [p] produces [b], while scaling it results in a continuum of voicing. Together, these findings indicate that S3Ms encode speech using phonologically interpretable and compositional vectors, demonstrating phonological vector arithmetic.All code and interactive demos are available at https://github.com/juice500ml/phonetic-arithmetic.

Abstract:
Scientific abstracts and lay summaries serve distinct but critical roles in research communication. Abstracts use technical language for academic audiences, while lay summaries aim to make findings accessible to non-specialists. With the rise of large language models (LLMs), there is increasing interest in automating the generation of both types of summaries—especially in the biomedical domain, where clarity and factual accuracy are essential. This study evaluates the performance of lightweight LLMs (under 8B parameters) in generating biomedical abstracts and lay summaries in a zero-shot setting. We assess outputs across three key dimensions: relevance, readability, and factuality. Additionally, we introduce a novel analysis of the sectional origin and desirability of information—where desirability reflects the utility of content from the reader’s perspective. We further compare human and LLM preferences using an objective ranking task. Our results show that LLM-generated summaries often contain comparable levels of desirable information to gold-standard human references. In several cases, LLM outputs are preferred by human evaluators and occasionally mistaken for human-authored text. These findings demonstrate the potential of lightweight LLMs for scalable, high-quality summarization and suggest their practical use in domains requiring both technical and accessible communication. The codebase for this study is publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/batuinmetz/Understanding-LLMs-summarization-capabilities

Abstract:
We introduce fs1, a simple yet effective method that improves the factuality of reasoning traces by sourcing them from large reasoning models and grounding them by conditioning on knowledge graph (KG) paths. We fine-tune eight instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) on 3.9K factually grounded reasoning traces and rigorously evaluate them on six complex open-domain question-answering (QA) benchmarks encompassing 23.9K questions. Our results demonstrate that our fs1-tuned model consistently outperforms instruction-tuned counterparts with parallel sampling by 6-14 absolute points (pass@). Our detailed analysis shows that fs1 considerably improves model performance over more complex questions (requiring 3 or more hops on KG paths) and numerical answer types compared to the baselines. Furthermore, in single-pass inference, we notice that smaller LLMs show the most improvements. While prior works demonstrate the effectiveness of reasoning traces primarily in the STEM domains, our work shows strong evidence that anchoring reasoning to factual KG paths is a critical step in transforming LLMs for reliable knowledge-intensive tasks.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support and mental health–related interactions outside clinical settings, yet little is known about how people evaluate and relate to these systems in everyday use. We analyze 5,126 Reddit posts from 47 mental health communities describing experiential or exploratory use of AI for emotional support or therapy. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model and therapeutic alliance theory, we develop a theory-informed annotation framework and apply a hybrid LLM–human pipeline to analyze evaluative language, adoption-related attitudes, and relational alignment at scale. Our results show that engagement is shaped primarily by narrated outcomes, trust, and response quality, rather than emotional bond alone. Positive sentiment is most strongly associated with task and goal alignment, while companionship-oriented use more often involves misaligned alliances and reported risks such as dependence and symptom escalation. Overall, this work demonstrates how theory-grounded constructs can be operationalized in large-scale discourse analysis and highlights the importance of studying how users interpret language technologies in sensitive, real-world contexts.

Abstract:
Inference attacks have been widely studied and offer a systematic risk assessment of ML services; however, their implementation and the attack parameters for optimal estimation are challenging for non-experts. The emergence of advanced large language models presents a promising yet largely unexplored opportunity to develop autonomous agents as inference attack experts, helping address this challenge. In this paper, we propose InferPilot, an autonomous agent capable of independently conducting inference attacks without human intervention. We evaluate it on 20 target services. The evaluation shows that our agent, using GPT-4o, achieves a 100.0% task completion rate and near-expert attack performance, with an average token cost of only 0.627 per run. The agent can also be powered by many other representative LLMs and can adaptively optimize its strategy under service constraints. We further perform trace analysis, demonstrating that design choices, such as a multi-agent framework and task-specific action spaces, effectively mitigate errors such as bad plans, inability to follow instructions, task context loss, and hallucinations. We anticipate that such agents could empower non-expert ML service providers, auditors, or regulators to systematically assess the risks of ML services without requiring deep domain expertise.

Abstract:
Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) with search engines enables large language models to iteratively retrieve up-to-date external knowledge, enhancing adaptability and generalization in complex question-answering tasks. However, existing search agent pipelines typically depend on reinforcement learning based optimization, which often suffers from sparse outcome rewards, leading to inefficient exploration and unstable training. We introduce CriticSearch, a fine-grained credit-assignment framework that supplies dense, turn-level feedback via a retrospective critic mechanism. During training, a frozen, asymmetric critique LLM retrospectively evaluates each turn using privileged information from the full trajectory and gold answers, converting these assessments into stable, dense rewards that guide policy improvement. Experimental results across diverse multi-hop reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that CriticSearch consistently outperforms existing baselines, achieving faster convergence, improved training stability, and higher performance.

Abstract:
Defending Large Language Models (LLMs) against backdoor attacks has long been trapped in a "cat-and-mouse" dilemma, where defenders passively react to ever-shifting attack strategies. To break this cycle, we posit that proactive immunization is inherently superior to reactive sanitization. In this study, we propose Poison-to-Poison (P2P), a general and effective defense algorithm that introduces a paradigm shift. Instead of waiting to detect malicious samples, P2P strategically implants benign triggers to reshape the model’s decision boundary, redirecting latent feature activation from malicious trajectories to a safe, controllable output space. This enforces the model to associate trigger-induced representations with safe outputs, thereby overriding the effects of original malicious triggers. Thanks to this robust and generalizable trigger-based fine-tuning, P2P is effective across task settings and attack types. Theoretically and empirically, we show that P2P can neutralize malicious backdoors while preserving task performance. We conduct extensive experiments on classification, mathematical reasoning, and summary generation tasks, involving multiple state-of-the-art LLMs. The results demonstrate that our P2P algorithm significantly reduces the attack success rate compared with baseline models. We hope that P2P can serve as a practical guideline for defending against backdoor attacks in the Model as a Service (MaaS) scenario, where benign prompts are embedded within the system to regulate model behavior.

Abstract:
Simulating dementia patients with large language models (LLMs) is challenging due to the need to jointly model cognitive impairment, emotional dynamics, and nonverbal behaviors over long conversations. We present DemMA, an expert-guided dementia dialogue agent for high-fidelity multi-turn patient simulation. DemMA constructs clinically grounded dementia personas by integrating pathology information, personality traits, and subtype-specific memory-status personas informed by clinical experts. To move beyond text-only simulation, DemMA explicitly models nonverbal behaviors, including motion, facial expressions, and vocal cues. We further introduce a Chain-of-Thought distillation framework that trains a single LLM to jointly generate reasoning traces, patient utterances, and aligned behavioral actions within one forward pass, enabling efficient deployment without multi-agent inference.

Abstract:
Large language models have demonstrated strong performance on general-purpose tasks but often fail to satisfy the accuracy requirements of knowledge-intensive domains such as law, medicine, and finance. Complex domain-specific generation is inherently compositional, involving multiple atomic skills such as reasoning, knowledge grounding, and numerical computation that are frequently interleaved at the token level. Existing domain adaptation methods typically train these heterogeneous skills jointly within a single objective, which makes it difficult for models to reliably coordinate multiple skills when solving complex tasks. In this work, we explicitly incorporate atomic skills into domain-specific model training and propose SplitThenMerge, a framework that decomposes domain competence into atomic skills, trains them independently, and composes them dynamically during generation. SplitThenMerge adopts a token-level sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture to enable fine-grained skill routing and coordination while implementing each skill as a lightweight LoRA expert to achieve parameter-efficient specialization. Experimental results demonstrate that our method consistently achieves superior performance in both legal and medical domains under the same training parameter budget.

Abstract:
Recently, there is an emerging trend of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) code automatically, resulting in commercialized products such as Siemens Industrial Copilots. While such LLM-driven products have the potential to transform the way control engineers program, they may also introduce a new attack surface. In this work, we introduce STBack, the first stealthy backdoor attack framework targeting LLM-based PLC code generation. STBack first incorporates six malicious logic injection patterns specifically designed for PLCs to generate the poisoned code samples, along with a three-stage automated pipeline to refine stealthiness. Then, it injects the backdoor by finetuning an LLM using the prompts with a semantic-integrated trigger and the corresponding malicious PLC code sample pairs. The compromised LLM will generate malicious PLC code when the trigger is identified in the prompts.We evaluate STBack on multiple LLMs, which achieves 82.92% average attack success rate while remaining stealthy, i.e., maintaining over 95% semantic similarity with benign code and bypassing quality validation, making the injected backdoor extremely challenging to detect. We also show that existing defenses are ineffective against our benign-looking trigger mechanism. This work reveals a novel and critical security threat for industrial copilots, calling for more cautious use and dedicated defenses.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in decision-making tasks, where not only accuracy but also reliable confidence estimates are essential. Well-calibrated confidence enables downstream systems to decide when to trust a model and when to defer to fallback mechanisms. In this work, we conduct a systematic study of calibration in two widely used fine-tuning paradigms: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR). We show that while RLVR improves task performance, it produces extremely overconfident models, whereas SFT yields substantially better calibration, even under distribution shift, though with smaller performance gains. Through targeted experiments, we diagnose RLVR’s failure, showing that decision tokens act as extraction steps of the decision in reasoning traces and do not carry confidence information, which prevents reinforcement learning from surfacing calibrated alternatives. Based on this insight, we propose a calibration-aware reinforcement learning formulation that directly adjusts decision-token probabilities. Our method preserves RLVR’s accuracy level while mitigating overconfidence, reducing ECE scores up to 9 points.

Abstract:
Retrieval shapes how language models access and cite knowledge in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). In historical research, the goal is often to locate the exact record for a specific regnal month, where temporal alignment matters as much as topical relevance. This is especially challenging for Classical Chinese annals: time is encoded in terse, implicit, non-Gregorian reign phrases that are context-dependent, so semantically plausible evidence can still be temporally invalid. We introduce ChunQiuTR, a time-keyed retrieval benchmark built from the Spring and Autumn Annals and its exegetical tradition. It organizes records by month-level reign keys and includes chrono-near confounders that mimic real retrieval failures. We propose CTD (Calendrical Temporal Dual-encoder), a time-aware dual-encoder combining Fourier-based absolute context with relative offset biasing. Experiments show consistent gains over semantic dual-encoder baselines under time-keyed evaluation. We will release ChunQiuTR and code after the anonymity period.

Abstract:
Tool-augmented large language models (LLMs) are typically trained via supervised imitation learning or coarse-grained reinforcement learning, approaches that primarily optimize one-shot tool calls. Existing practices of self-reflection largely rely on heuristic prompting or unidirectional reasoning traces: the model is encouraged to “think more,” rather than to treat error diagnosis and correction as a learnable capability. This makes them fragile in multi-turn interaction settings—once a call fails, the model tends to repeat the same mistake instead of recovering. To address this issue, we propose structured reflection, which transforms the “from error to repair” process into a first-class, controllable, and trainable action. The agent produces a concise yet precise reflection process: specifically, the model diagnoses the error based on evidence from the previous step and then proposes a correct and executable follow-up call. During training, we combine DAPO and GSPO’s objective functions and design a more principled reward mechanism tailored to tool calling, optimizing the stepwise strategy Reflect → Call → Final. To evaluate this capability, we introduce Tool-Reflection-Bench, a lightweight benchmark dataset that programmatically verifies structural validity, executability, parameter correctness, and result consistency. Tasks in the benchmark are constructed as miniature trajectories of Erroneous Call → Reflection → Corrected Call and are split into disjoint training and testing sets. Experiments on BFCL v3 and Tool-Reflection-Bench show that our method achieves significant improvements in multi-turn tool-call success rates and error recovery, while also reducing redundant calls. These results demonstrate that making reflection explicit and treating it as an optimization objective can substantially enhance the reliability of tool interaction, providing a reproducible pathway for agents to grow stronger by learning from failure. We will release all the code and datasets as open source once the paper is accepted by the community.

Abstract:
Emotional Quotient (EQ) has emerged as a competency for seamless human-AI integration. However, since traditional EQ scales focus on self-healing , directly migrating them to Large Language Models (LLMs) often leads to ignorance of healing others . While EQ metrics specifically designed for LLMs have been proposed, they remain mired in two dilemmas: dimensional deficiency and fragmented testing. Hence, this paper establishes a Quad-in-One architecture for a closed-loop EQ evaluation. First, we propose the PACE Taxonomy to define four dimensions of LLM EQ. Upon this, the Causal-PACE framework is developed to eliminate causal confounding bias triggered by the interactions among EQ dimensions, ensuring a rigorous quantification of composite EQ scores. To operationalize this framework, we implement the PACE-AB , a mutil-agent EQevaluation board system. Finally, we curate the PACE-2700 dataset, featuring 2,700 high-quality instructions, to serve as a comprehensive benchmark for large-scale validation.Experimental results demonstrate that the EQ values derived via the Causal-PACE achieve a high alignment of 89.31% with human preferences, while the automated PACE-AB system maintains a robust consistency of 83.6%. Our data is publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PACE-2700-8E52 .

Abstract:
Cross-domain task-oriented dialogue requires reasoning over implicit and explicit feasibility constraints while planning long-horizon, multi-turn actions. Large language models (LLMs) can infer such constraints but are unreliable over long horizons, while Reinforcement learning (RL) optimizes long-horizon behavior yet cannot recover constraints from raw dialogue. Naively coupling LLMs with RL is therefore brittle: unverified or unstructured LLM outputs can corrupt state representations and misguide policy learning. Motivated by this, we propose Verified LLM-Knowledge empowered RL (VLK-RL), a hybrid framework that makes LLM-derived constraint reasoning usable for RL. VLK-RL first elicits candidate constraints with an LLM and then verifies them via a dual-role cross-examination procedure to suppress hallucinations and cross-turn inconsistencies. The verified constraints are mapped into ontology-aligned slot–value representations, yielding a structured, constraint-aware state for RL policy optimization. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that VLK-RL significantly improves generalization and robustness, outperforming strong single-model baselines on long-horizon tasks.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have empowered autonomous web agents to execute natural language instructions directly on real-world webpages. However, existing agents often struggle with complex tasks involving dynamic interactions and long-horizon execution due to rigid planning strategies and hallucination-prone reasoning. To address these limitations, we propose WebUncertainty, a novel autonomous agent framework designed to tackle dual-level uncertainty in planning and reasoning. Specifically, we design a Task Uncertainty-Driven Adaptive Planning Mechanism that adaptively selects planning modes to navigate unknown environments. Furthermore, we introduce an Action Uncertainty-Driven Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) Reasoning Mechanism. This mechanism incorporates the Confidence-induced Action Uncertainty (ConActU) strategy to quantify both aleatoric uncertainty (AU) and epistemic uncertainty (EU), thereby optimizing the search process and guiding robust decision-making. Experimental results on the WebArena and WebVoyager benchmarks demonstrate that WebUncertainty achieves superior performance compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in assisting scientific research, yet their ability to discover high-quality research hypotheses remains unexamined due to the lack of a dedicated benchmark. To address this gap, we introduce the first large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs on a sufficient set of scientific discovery sub-tasks—inspiration retrieval, hypothesis composition, and hypothesis ranking—where sufficient means that perfectly solving these sub-tasks perfectly solves the overall discovery task. We develop an automated LLM-based framework that extracts critical components—research questions, background surveys, inspirations, and hypotheses—from papers across 12 disciplines, with expert validation confirming its accuracy. To prevent data contamination, we focus exclusively on publications from 2024 onward, ensuring minimal overlap with LLM pretraining data; our automated framework further enables automatic extraction of even more recent papers as LLM pretraining cutoffs advance, supporting scalable and contamination-free automatic renewal of this discovery benchmark. Our evaluation shows that, across disciplines, LLMs excel at inspiration retrieval—an out-of-distribution task—suggesting their ability to surface novel knowledge associations.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for recommendation (LLMRec) due to their powerful reasoning and generalization abilities. However, effectively aligning the textual semantics modeled by LLMs with the collaborative signals remains a key challenge. Existing methods either translate collaborative information into textual prompts or inject pre-trained embeddings into the LLM, both of which treat structural information as static input and fail to capture high-order relational dependencies.To bridge this gap, we propose GraphLoRA, a novel framework that generalizes low-rank adaptation from independent to structure-aware propagation. GraphLoRA embeds a trainable graph message-passing network within the low-rank adaptation pathway, enabling structural signals to propagate through the parameter space.This design allows collaborative topology to explicitly guide parameter updates, fostering deep integration between graph-structured and textual semantic information. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that GraphLoRA not only outperforms state-of-the-art LLM-based recommendation methods but also achieves superior generalization, effectively balancing structural reasoning capability with computational efficiency.

Abstract:
Visually Rich Document Understanding (VRDU) has become a pivotal area of research, driven by the need to automatically interpret documents that contain intricate visual, textual, and structural elements. Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant promise in this domain, including both OCR-based and OCR-free approaches for information extraction from document images. This survey reviews recent advances in MLLM-based VRDU, highlighting emerging trends and promising research directions with a focus on two key aspects: (1) techniques for representing and integrating textual, visual, and layout features; (2) training paradigms, including pretraining, instruction tuning, and training strategies. Moreover, we address challenges such as data scarcity, handling multi-page and multilingual documents, and integrating emerging trends such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation and agentic frameworks. Our analysis offers a roadmap for advancing MLLM-based VRDU toward more scalable, reliable, and adaptable systems.

Abstract:
Short text clustering has gained significant prominence due to its ubiquity in real-world applications. Despite the recent success of contrastive clustering, existing paradigms still suffer from two critical bottlenecks: (1) conventional data augmentation provides limited semantic granularity and may introduce unintended noise; and (2) the absence of global optimization for cluster assignments often precipitates the accumulation of pseudo-label noise, thereby compromising semantic consistency. To bridge these gaps, we propose MAST, a Multi-view Alignment Strategy with Transport-based clustering. MAST constructs complementary structural views to capture multi-granularity semantic features and introduces a multi-view contrastive objective that jointly aligns original, augmented, and structure-enhanced embeddings. To mitigate representation over-smoothing, we incorporate structure-aware negative reweighting and intermediate-layer negative sampling. Furthermore, MAST employs high-confidence guided refinement and an optimal transport-based pseudo-label alignment mechanism to enforce global semantic consistency across multiple views. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that MAST consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, establishing a new competitive baseline for short text clustering.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in perception, yet holistic Affective Image Content Analysis (AICA)—which integrates perception, reasoning, and generation into a unified framework—remains underexplored. To address this, we introduce AICA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising three core tasks: Emotion Understanding (EU), Reasoning (ER), and Generation (EGCG). We evaluate 23 VLMs, revealing critical gaps: models struggle with intensity calibration and suffer from descriptive shallowness in open-ended tasks. To bridge these gaps, we propose Grounded Affective Tree (GAT) Prompting, a training-free framework that integrates visual scaffolding with hierarchical reasoning. Experiments show that GAT effectively corrects intensity errors and significantly enhances descriptive depth, establishing a robust baseline for future affective multimodal research.

Abstract:
Full-state latent communication in LLM-based multi-agent systems offers richer semantics than text but suffers from memory overhead scaling linearly with collaboration rounds. We propose CondenseFlow , which introduces the Latent Thought Condenser (LTC) —a lightweight module using learnable semantic probes to compress KV caches into fixed-size representations, achieving 𝒪(1) communication complexity regardless of context length. We theoretically prove that compression error is bounded by attention concentration and accumulates controllably across rounds. On seven benchmarks spanning six models, CondenseFlow reduces KV cache memory by over 99% and inference latency by approximately 20% compared to dense transfer with negligible accuracy degradation, while outperforming text-based methods by 1.7 percentage points on average across all configurations. Code is available at https://github.com/xxy33/condenseflow.

Abstract:
Long-horizon LLM agents trained with sparse terminal rewards tend to experience slow and unstable learning, and the issue is amplified by group-normalized on-policy objectives commonly used for LLM training (e.g., GRPO). When rollout groups collapse to nearly all failures early in training, within-group normalization yields degenerate advantages and weak learning signals. To address this, we propose Curriculum Replay via Progressive Suffixes from Successful Trajectories (CRPS), a lightweight RL-training strategy that turns serendipitous terminal successes into a within-trajectory curriculum. CRPS maintains a buffer of successful trajectories and restarts rollouts from suffix states, with an online controller adapting k to match agent competence and keep replay outcomes informative. Across ALFWorld and WebShop with different foundation models, CRPS consistently outperforms full-episode GRPO and naive experience replay. Group-level diagnostics further show that CRPS reduces degenerate groups ratio and increases within-group outcome diversity, aligning with faster and more stable training.

Abstract:
As retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) tackles complex tasks, increasingly expanded contexts offer richer information, but at the cost of higher latency and increased cognitive load on the model. To mitigate this bottleneck, especially for intricate multi-hop questions, we introduce BRIEF-Pro. It is a universal, lightweight compressor that distills relevant evidence for a given query from retrieved documents into a concise summary for seamless integration into in-context RAG. Using seed data consisting of relatively short contexts (fewer than 1k words), BRIEF-Pro is trained to perform abstractive compression of extended contexts exceeding 10k words across a wide range of scenarios. Furthermore, BRIEF-Pro offers flexible user control over summary length by allowing users to specify the desired number of sentences. Experiments on four open-domain multi-hop question-answering datasets show that BRIEF-Pro generates more concise and relevant summaries, enhancing performance across small, large, and proprietary language models. With the 70B reader model, 32× compression by BRIEF-Pro improves QA performance by 4.67% on average over LongLLMLingua’s 9×, while requiring only 23% of its computational overhead.

Abstract:
LLM-based web agents have become increasingly popular for their utility in daily life and work. However, they exhibit critical vulnerabilities when processing malicious URLs: accepting a disguised malicious URL enables subsequent access to unsafe webpages, which can cause severe damage to service providers and users. Despite this risk, no benchmark currently targets this emerging threat. To address this gap, we propose MalURLBench, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ vulnerabilities to malicious URLs. MalURLBench contains 61,845 attack instances spanning 10 real-world scenarios and 7 categories of real malicious websites. Experiments with 12 popular LLMs reveal that existing models struggle to detect elaborately disguised malicious URLs. We further identify and analyze key factors that impact attack success rates and propose URLGuard, a lightweight defense module. We believe this work will provide a foundational resource for advancing the security of web agents.

Abstract:
Classical Chinese poetry is a treasured cultural heritage of humanity, attracting extensive research interest. However, the study of classical Chinese poetry is hindered by the lack of open, large-scale, and fine-grained multimodal datasets.Prior datasets are either limited by modality constraints, dataset size, or the level of dataset refinement, making them inadequate for effectively supporting studies and the development of applications in classical Chinese poetry.To address these issues, we propose a method for constructing a large-scale and fine-grained multimodal knowledge graph of classical Chinese poetry. We first design an informative ontology graph for classical Chinese poetry and comprehensively collect knowledge about poetry based on it. Furthermore, the method leverages knowledge augmentation, prompt optimization, and text-image alignment to acquire comprehensive, fine-grained knowledge. Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are conducted on the Multimodal Knowledge Graph of Classical Chinese Poetry (CPMK), highlighting its comprehensiveness and high quality.We also conduct downstream evaluations on four tasks: poetry question answering, poetry theme classification, poetry-image retrieval, and rigid-formats poetry generation.Significant results are achieved across all four tasks, demonstrating CPMK’s effectiveness in supporting research on Chinese poetry.CPMK will be released to promote research in Chinese culture.

Abstract:
The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into high-stakes domains necessitates reliable safety and compliance evaluation. However, existing static benchmarks are ill-equipped to address the dynamic nature of AI risks and evolving regulations, creating a critical safety gap. This paper introduces a new paradigm of agentic safety evaluation, reframing evaluation as a continuous and self-evolving process rather than a one-time audit. We then propose a novel multi-agent framework AgenticEval, which autonomously ingests unstructured policy documents to generate and perpetually evolve a comprehensive safety benchmark. AgenticEval leverages a synergistic pipeline of specialized agents and incorporates a Self-evolving Evaluation loop, where the system learns from evaluation results to craft progressively more sophisticated and targeted test cases. Our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of AgenticEval, showing a consistent decline in model safety as the evaluation hardens. For instance, GPT-5’s safety rate on the EU AI Act drops from 72.50% to 36.36% over successive iterations. These findings reveal the limitations of static assessments and highlight our framework’s ability to uncover deep vulnerabilities missed by traditional methods, underscoring the urgent need for dynamic evaluation ecosystems to ensure the safe and responsible deployment of advanced AI.

Abstract:
Knowledge editing is a crucial technique for daily updates in LLMs, requiring a balance between accurately modifying incorrect knowledge and preserving existing information. The recently proposed AlphaEdit method achieves competitive editing performance by updating parameters under null-space constraints. However, our theoretical analysis reveals that AlphaEdit struggles with high knowledge conflicts and inconsistencies during editing. To address this, we propose a new editing method AlphaEdit+, featuring three key improvements: 1) relaxing null-space constraints by adding a matrix perturbation through optimization to resolve conflicts between new and preserved knowledge; 2) introducing a weighting scheme on previously updated knowledge constraints to mitigate conflicts between new and historical editing; 3) developing a value smoothing algorithm to resolve high knowledge inconsistencies. These enhancements collectively ensure robust editing while maintaining model coherence. Comprehensive experiments show that our approach AlphaEdit+ not only resolves the brittleness of the original method on carefully constructed challenging datasets but also outperforms AlphaEdit on existing benchmark datasets.

Abstract:
We introduce Goal-Conditioned Visual Navigation Instruction Generation (GoViG), a new task that aims to generate contextually coherent navigation instructions solely from egocentric visual observations of initial and goal states. Unlike prior work relying on structured inputs, such as semantic annotations or environmental maps, GoViG exclusively leverages raw egocentric visual data, improving adaptability to unseen and unstructured environments. Our method addresses this task by decomposing it into two interconnected subtasks: (1) navigation visualization, predicting intermediate visual states bridging the initial and goal views; and (2) instruction generation, synthesizing coherent instructions grounded in observed and anticipated visuals. Both subtasks are integrated within an autoregressive multimodal LLM trained with tailored objectives to ensure spatial accuracy and linguistic clarity. Furthermore, we introduce two multimodal reasoning strategies, one-pass and interleaved reasoning, to mimic incremental human navigation cognition. To comprehensively evaluate our method, we propose the R2R-Goal dataset, combining diverse synthetic and real-world trajectories. Empirical results demonstrate significant performance improvements over state-of-the-art methods in BLEU-4 and CIDEr scores along with robust cross-domain generalization. Our project is available at https://github.com/F1y1113/GoViG.

Abstract:
LLM-based search agents often concatenate the full interaction history into the context, producing long and noisy inputs, and increasing compute cost and GPU memory overhead. To address this issue, we propose MemSearcher, an agent framework that maintains a compact memory during multi-turn interactions, retaining only question-relevant information and thereby keeping the context length stable across turns. Training MemSearcher is challenging because each trajectory spans multiple turns under different LLM contexts, making each turn an independent optimization target in reinforcement learning. We introduce multi-context GRPO, which propagates trajectory-level advantages to all turns for end-to-end optimization. Experiments demonstrate that MemSearcher outperforms strong history-concatenation (ReAct-style) baselines on a range of public datasets while maintaining nearly constant token counts across multi-turn interactions. The code and models will be publicly available at https://github.com/icip-cas/MemSearcher.

Abstract:
Emotional interaction is increasingly crucial for conversational AI, yet current systems lack a self-emotion determination mechanism to drive the streaming text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. We propose an emotion-planning framework that determines the emotion prior to the textual generation, grounding the downstream emotional TTS in a streaming manner. The framework is implemented by a plug-and-play LLM module, initialized from pretrained LLMs, and trained by reinforcement learning (RL) with emotions as the actions. A hybrid reward is employed which combines imitation signals with theory-driven scoring, in which the theory of Plutchik’s wheel of emotions is adopted. By experiments on DailyDialog, EmoryNLP, IMEOCAP, and MELD, our method outperforms prompting and finetuning baselines on both emotion determination and response quality. We finally implement an entire streaming pipeline for real-time deployment, with the speech quality confirming the framework’s emotional alignment, contextual coherence, and expressive fluency. Codes, cases, and demos are available in https://sixingdeguo.github.io/EmoQ-page/.

Abstract:
Adaptive multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly adopted as solutions to complex problems. However, their optimization for narrow task ranges leaves it unclear whether they can function as general-purpose systems. To fill this gap, we conduct an extensive empirical study on adaptive MAS, revealing two key findings: (1) they are prone to topological overfitting, defined as failures in domain transfer; and (2) they exhibit illusory coordination, where surface-level accuracy is high but underlying agent coordination deviates from ideal MAS behavior, raising concerns about their practical effectiveness. These observations highlight the urgent need to prioritize generalization in MAS development and motivate more thorough evaluation beyond correctness of the final answer.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucinations in large language models by incorporating external knowledge. However, retrieval does not always return relevant documents and may return noisy ones. Indiscriminately retrieving and utilizing this external knowledge can interfere with the model’s originally correct reasoning. In this work, we propose Dual-Decision Retrieval-Augmented Generation (D 2 -RAG), which integrates multi-dimensional uncertainty estimation to decide whether to retrieve and employs adaptive contrastive decoding to handle retrieved contexts of varying quality. Specifically, we first integrate uncertainty estimation scores that assess model uncertainty from multiple perspectives, construct them into a comprehensive feature vector, and train a lightweight retrieval decision model to accurately identify the model’s knowledge boundaries and determine whether to retrieve. Subsequently, we dynamically adjust the contrastive decoding strategy based on the utility of retrieved contexts to enhance the utilization of relevant contexts while suppressing interference from noisy contexts. Extensive experiments on four medical question-answering datasets demonstrate that D 2 -RAG significantly outperforms baselines, enabling retrieval-augmented Llama3.1-8B to surpass non-retrieval-augmented Llama3.1-70B on the MedMCQA dataset. The source code is available on https://github.com/zakelawen/d–rag.

Abstract:
Accurate question answering (QA) in disaster management requires reasoning over uncertain and conflicting information, a setting poorly captured by existing benchmarks built on clean evidence. We introduce DisastQA, a rigorously verified benchmark of 3,000 expert-annotated questions (2,000 multiple-choice and 1,000 open-ended) spanning eight disaster types. The benchmark is constructed via a human-LLM collaboration pipeline with stratified sampling to ensure balanced coverage. Models are evaluated under varying evidence conditions, from closed-book to noisy evidence integration, enabling separation of internal knowledge from reasoning under imperfect information. For open-ended QA, we propose a human-verified keypoint-based evaluation protocol emphasizing factual completeness over verbosity. Experiments with 20 models reveal substantial divergences from general-purpose leaderboards such as MMLU-Pro. While recent open-weight models approach proprietary systems in clean settings, performance degrades sharply under realistic noise, exposing critical reliability gaps for disaster response. All code, data, and evaluation resources are available at https://github.com/TamuChen18/DisastQA

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable success of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in generative tasks, we observe that they exhibit a counterintuitive deficiency in the zero-shot multimodal retrieval task. In this work, we investigate the underlying mechanisms that hinder MLLMs from being effective retrievers. With the help of sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we decompose MLLM output representations into interpretable semantic concepts to probe their intrinsic behavior. Our analysis reveals that the representation space of MLLMs is overwhelmingly dominated by textual semantics; and the visual semantics essential for multimodal retrieval only constitute a small portion. We find that this imbalance is compounded by the heavy focus of MLLMs on bridging image-text modalities, which facilitates generation but homogenizes embeddings and finally diminishes the discriminative power required for multimodal retrieval. We further discover that the specific feature components that contribute most to the similarity computations of MLLMs are actually distractors that greatly reduce retrieval performance. Building on these insights, we propose , a test-time adaptation approach that applies a whitening transformation to adjust the geometry of MLLM representation spaces. Empirical results show that this simple intervention consistently improves zero-shot multimodal retrieval performance across diverse MLLMs without fine-tuning efforts.

Abstract:
The rapid proliferation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has ushered in the era of the “Agentic Economy,” where Mobile Agents autonomously execute high-stakes financial transactions. While these agents demonstrate impressive operational capabilities, their adversarial robustness remains a glaring blind spot. In this paper, we identify a systemic vulnerability termed Visual Dominance Hallucination (VDH), where imperceptible adversarial visual cues can act as a “super-stimulus,” overriding textual price evidence in our evaluated screenshot-based price-constrained settings and forcing the agent into irrational economic decisions. We propose PriceBlind, a stealthy, white-box adversarial attack framework for controlled screenshot-based evaluation. Unlike prior works that rely on conspicuous artifacts like pop-ups, PriceBlind exploits the modality gap in CLIP-based encoders via a novel Semantic-Decoupling Loss. Rather than literally making a luxury item “look cheap,” this regularizer weakens the consistency between high-price text and visual value cues by aligning the image embedding with a low-cost/value-associated anchor region while preserving pixel-level fidelity. On our main E-ShopBench benchmark with clear price constraints, screenshot-based white-box evaluation yields ASRs around 80% on the evaluated agents. Under the evaluated single-turn coordinate-selection protocol in a simplified layout-aware setting, our Ensemble-DI-FGSM strategy also yields non-trivial black-box transfer, with ASR roughly 35–41% across GPT-4o, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and Claude-3.5-Sonnet. In the same screenshot-based setting, standard robust encoders reduce ASR only partially, while a Verify-then-Act stack with robust encoders lowers ASR to below 10% at some clean-accuracy cost.

Abstract:
Automated software engineering, particularly resolving real-world issues on benchmarks like SWE-bench, remains a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). To address this, we introduce SWE-Swiss, a two-phase training recipe that systematically develops these capabilities. Our approach first decomposes issue resolution into three core skills: Localization, Repair, and Unit Test Generation. In the first phase, we perform multi-task Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on three new, meticulously curated datasets to build a versatile foundation. The second phase applies targeted Reinforcement Learning (RL), using direct feedback from test execution to boost the critical skill of code repair. The resulting model, SWE-Swiss-32B, establishes a new state-of-the-art for open-source models in its size class, achieving a 60.2% score on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark and placing it in the same top-tier performance bracket as much larger models. Finally, we show that despite its specialized training, SWE-Swiss-32B demonstrates strong generalization to other common LLM benchmarks. To accelerate research in the community, we are open-sourcing the models and our complete training datasets.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents execute tasks through multi-step workflows that combine planning, memory, and tool use. While this design enables autonomy, it also expands the attack surface for backdoor threats. Backdoor triggers injected into specific stages of an agent workflow can persist through multiple intermediate states and adversely influence downstream outputs. However, existing studies remain fragmented and typically analyze individual attack vectors in isolation, leaving the cross-stage interaction and propagation of backdoor triggers poorly understood from an agent-centric perspective.To fill this gap, we propose BackdoorAgent , a modular and stage-aware framework that provides a unified, agent-centric view of backdoor threats in LLM agents. BackdoorAgent structures the attack surface into three functional stages of agentic workflows, including planning attacks , memory attacks , and tool-use attacks , and instruments agent execution to enable systematic analysis of trigger activation and propagation across different stages.Building on this framework, we construct a standardized benchmark spanning four representative agent applications: Agent QA , Agent Code , Agent Web , and Agent Drive , covering both language-only and multimodal settings. Our empirical analysis shows that triggers implanted at a single stage can persist across multiple steps and propagate through intermediate states. For instance, when using a GPT-based backbone, we observe trigger persistence in 43.58% of planning attacks, 77.97% of memory attacks, and 60.28% of tool-stage attacks, highlighting the vulnerabilities of the agentic workflow itself to backdoor threats. Our code is available at https://github.com/Yunhao-Feng/BackdoorAgent .

Abstract:
Lifelong knowledge editing aims to inject a stream of factual updates into large language models (LLMs) without retraining, yet existing memory-based editors often suffer from catastrophic forgetting as edits accumulate. We argue that a key factor is the coupled knowledge memory mechanism, where addressing (routing) and storage (writing via memory-module updates) are entangled. This entanglement makes it difficult to confine the effects of each edit to its intended scope, particularly in multi-domain and associated-fact editing streams, where updates either span diverse semantic domains or repeatedly modify related attributes of the same subject. Consequently, updating memory for one edit inadvertently alters the routing and stored representations of previously injected edits, leading to catastrophic forgetting as edits accumulate. We propose DKME, which decouples addressing from storage via two stages: decoupled semantic addressing learns a fact-aware manifold for scope-aware routing, and partitioned memory storage localizes edits to memory partitions identified by unsupervised clustering in the embedding space. Experiments on three benchmarks, including HalluEditBench, CKnowEdit, and WikiData counterfact , demonstrate that DKME consistently achieves a more favorable trade-off between editing success and locality compared to baselines, while maintaining more stable performance as the edit scale increases.

Abstract:
Generating presentation videos from scientific papers is challenging due to the need for long-document discourse planning and cross-lingual grounding. Existing Paper2Video systems are largely monolingual and often rely on single-pass pipelines, which can limit the coherence and informativeness of the resulting presentations.We present mPresenter, a multilingual agentic Paper2Video system that decomposes the task into planning, audience-oriented critique, layout-aware slide generation, and multilingual figure interpretation, enabling iterative refinement at the discourse level. To facilitate reproducible evaluation, we also introduce mPreBench, a multilingual benchmark that evaluates presentation videos via question answering as a proxy for effective information transfer. Experimental results indicate that mPresenter improves question-answering accuracy relative to prior systems, while maintaining affordable cost and latency.

Abstract:
Causal reasoning is a crucial component of understanding complex phenomena and building intelligent systems. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their strong capabilities in reasoning tasks; however, their true understanding of causal relationships remains limited, particularly in cases where causal chains are misidentified or reliance on empirical inference occurs. To mitigate the risk that models misclassify data as false positives due to these issues, we introduce CausalityCheck, an automated tool designed to efficiently generate causal reasoning checklists. This checklist enables the creation of multi-task causal reasoning datasets with task generalization and reasoning robustness from a single causal reasoning dataset. Using CausalityCheck, we developed CausalityCheck-CP to assess the causal reasoning abilities of 18 LLMs. This framework also measures the extent to which causal chains are misidentified or rely on empirical inferences. Our results indicate that the current large language models still face two critical issues when handling complex causal reasoning tasks: incorrect identification of causal chains and reliance on empirical inference. The code and data are available at https://github.com/dzh597/CausalityCheck.

Abstract:
Recent speech foundation models excel at multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) for high-resource languages, but adapting them to low-resource languages remains challenging due to data scarcity and efficiency constraints. Full-model fine-tuning is computationally expensive and prone to overfitting, while parameter-efficient methods like LoRA apply adaptation uniformly across layers, overlooking internal representations thus compromising effectiveness and efficiency. We analyze multilingual ASR models and reveal a U-shaped adaptability pattern: early and late layers are language-specific and require more adaptation, while intermediate layers retain shared semantics and need less. Building on this observation, we propose DAMA, a Depth-Aware Model Adaptation framework that allocates adaptation capacity according to each layer’s role. DAMA also introduces Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)-based initialization to constrain adaptation and preserve the U-shaped pattern, as well as a frozen middle-layer basis for further efficiency. Evaluated on 18 low-resource languages across two benchmark datasets, DAMA matches or surpasses state-of-the-art accuracy with 80% fewer trainable parameters, achieves a 29% error reduction under extreme data scarcity, and significantly improves memory, training time, and computational efficiency over baselines. These results highlight the benefits of structure-aware adaptation for efficient, scalable multilingual ASR.

Abstract:
Reasoning-capable large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance on complex tasks but often exhibit overthinking after distillation, generating unnecessarily long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning even for simple inputs and incurring high inference cost. However, naively shortening reasoning length can degrade reasoning accuracy, as concise reasoning may be insufficient for certain inputs and lacks explicit supervision. We propose Auto Long-Short Reasoning (AutoL2S), a distillation framework that empowers non-reasoning LLMs to think thoroughly but only when necessary. AutoL2S first learns a lightweight switching token with verified long-short CoTs to enable instance-wise long-short reasoning selection. Then it leverages long-short reasoning rollouts induced by switching tokens within a GRPO-style loss to improve reasoning efficiency while maintaining accuracy. Experiments demonstrate that AutoL2S effectively reduces reasoning length up to 71% with minimal accuracy loss, yielding markedly better trade-off in token length and inference time while preserving accuracy. The code is available at https://github.com/amandaluof/AutoL2S.

Abstract:
Large Language Models excel at NLP tasks but remain prone to hallucinations, limiting trust in real-world applications. We present HalluGuard, a 4B-parameter Small Reasoning Model (SRM) designed as a guardrail for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, which classify document-claim pairs as grounded or hallucinated in closed-book, document-grounded settings and produces evidence-grounded justifications. Our approach combines (i) a domain-agnostic synthetic dataset derived from FineWeb and refined through multi-stage curation and data reformation, (ii) synthetic grounded and hallucinated claims, and (iii) preference-based fine-tuning with Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) to distill large-model reasoning into a smaller backbone. On the RAGTruth subset of the LLM-AggreFact benchmark, HalluGuard achieves 84.4% balanced accuracy (BAcc), surpassing specialized models, MiniCheck (7B; 84.0%) and Granite Guardian 3.3 (8B; 82.2%) while using roughly half their parameters. Across the benchmark, it reaches 77.1% BAcc, surpassing larger general-purpose LLMs such as GPT-4o (75.9%). HalluGuard and datasets will be released upon acceptance.

Abstract:
Empathy is essential for fostering natural interactions in spoken dialogue systems, as it enables machines to recognize the emotional tone of human speech and deliver empathetic responses. Recent research has made significant progress in developing empathetic spoken chatbots based on large language models (LLMs). However, several challenges still exist when training such models, including reliance on costly empathetic speech instruction data and a lack of emotional expressiveness in the generated speech. Finetuning LLM with cross-modal empathetic instruction data may also lead to catastrophic forgetting and a degradation of its general capability. To address these challenges, we propose FreezeEmpath, an end-to-end empathetic spoken chatbot trained in a simple and efficient manner. The entire training process relies solely on existing speech instruction data and speech emotion recognition (SER) data, while keeping the LLM’s parameters frozen. Experiments demonstrate that FreezeEmpath is able to generate emotionally expressive speech and outperforms other empathetic models in empathetic dialogue, SER, and SpokenQA tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our training strategy.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge retrieved at inference time. While RAG demonstrates strong performance on benchmarks largely derived from general-domain corpora like Wikipedia, its effectiveness under realistic, diverse retrieval scenarios remains underexplored. We evaluate RAG systems using MassiveDS, a large-scale datastore with mixture of knowledge, and identified critical limitations: retrieval mainly benefits smaller models, rerankers add minimal value, and no single retrieval source consistently excels. Moreover, current LLMs struggle to route queries across heterogeneous knowledge sources. These findings highlight the need for adaptive retrieval strategies before deploying RAG in real-world settings.

Abstract:
Prior representative ReAct-style approaches in autonomous Software Engineering (SWE) typically lack the explicit System-2 reasoning required for deep analysis and handling complex edge cases. While recent reasoning models demonstrate the potential of extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT), applying them to the multi-turn SWE task creates a fundamental dilemma: retaining full reasoning history leads to context explosion and "Lost-in-the-Middle" degradation, while discarding it would force the agent to redundantly re-reason at every step. To address these challenges, we propose SWE-AGILE, a novel software agent framework designed to bridge the gap between reasoning depth, efficiency, and context constraints. SWE-AGILE introduces a Dynamic Reasoning Context strategy, maintaining a "sliding window" of detailed reasoning for immediate continuity to prevent redundant re-analyzing, while compressing historical reasoning content into concise Reasoning Digests. Empirically, SWE-AGILE sets a new standard for 7B-8B models on SWE-Bench-Verified using only 2.2k trajectories and 896 tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/KDEGroup/SWE-AGILE.

Abstract:
In the era of large language models (LLMs), supervised neural methods remain the state-of-the-art (SOTA) for Coreference Resolution. Yet, their full potential is underexplored, particularly in incremental clustering, which faces the critical challenge of balancing efficiency with performance for long texts. To address the limitation, we propose MEIC-DT, a novel dual-threshold, memory-efficient incremental clustering approach based on a lightweight Transformer. MEIC-DT features a dual-threshold constraint mechanism designed to precisely control the Transformer’s input scale within a predefined memory budget. This mechanism incorporates two key components: a Statistics-Aware Eviction Strategy (SAES) and an Internal Regularization Policy (IRP). The SAES utilizes distinct statistical profiles from the training and inference phases for intelligent cache management. The IRP strategically condenses clusters by selecting the most representative mentions, thereby preserving semantic integrity. Extensive experiments on common benchmarks demonstrate that MEIC-DT achieves highly competitive coreference performance under stringent memory constraints.

Abstract:
While Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have emerged as a promising non-autoregressive paradigm comparable to auto-regressive (AR) models, their faithfulness, specifically regarding hallucination, remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we present the first controlled comparative study to evaluate hallucination patterns in dLLMs. Our results demonstrate that current dLLMs exhibit a higher propensity for hallucination than AR counterparts controlled for architecture, scale, and pre-training weights. Furthermore, an analysis of inference-time compute reveals divergent dynamics: while quasi-autoregressive generation suffers from early saturation, non-sequential decoding unlocks potential for continuous refinement. Finally, we identify distinct failure modes unique to the diffusion process, including premature termination, incomplete denoising, and context intrusion. Our findings underscore that although dLLMs have narrowed the performance gap on general tasks, their distinct hallucination mechanisms pose a critical challenge to model reliability.

Abstract:
The rise of Human-AI collaboration can effectively speed up the research process for experts and allow anyone with critical thinking skills to conduct innovative work. A key part of this collaboration is the AI’s ability to improve a paper with human feedback—updating both the text and experiments to meet high standards. To evaluate this skill, we introduce ReviseBench, an extensible benchmark built on real academic data that can be easily scaled via agent-driven automated data collection. It tests the skills of Large Language Models (LLMs) on paper interpretation, experimental implementation, and paper formulation, using authors’ camera-ready versions as natural human baselines. To facilitate a fine-grained assessment, we further propose ReviseArena, a platform supporting pair-wise comparisons between different AI-revised papers. Our initial evaluation results on ReviseBench reveal that even state-of-the-art foundation LLMs struggle significantly in this domain, achieving a win rate of less than 10% against human experts, and facing issues like incremental revision, unprofessional revision, and potential data fabrication. Our code and data are released publicly at: https://github.com/CGCL-codes/ReviseBench.

Abstract:
Consistency models (CMs) have shown promise in the efficient generation of both image and text. This raises the natural question of whether we can learn a unified CM for efficient multimodal generation (e.g., text-to-image) and understanding (e.g., image-to-text). Intuitively, such a model could be acquired by applying the consistency distillation (CD) to existing unified multimodal models. However, the key challenge is establishing a unified denoising perspective for both image and text generation, which is essential for establishing the consistency mapping. To tackle this, at the representation level, we advocate for discrete tokens for both modalities to best preserve language modeling capabilities. Critically, instead of defining the text denoising trajectory via recent discrete diffusion language modeling principles, we specify it using the parallel decoding trace of an autoregressive language model, benefiting from the latter’s superior performance in general text generation tasks. The denoising trajectory of image tokens adheres to standard discrete diffusion. We train our unified consistency models (UniCMs) on these combined multimodal trajectories simultaneously with a unified objective. We introduce a trajectory segmentation strategy to improve the training convergence. Empirically, in text-to-image generation, UniCMs outperform SD3 on GenEval and Image Reward, while requiring only approximately 1/8 of the sampling time. Meanwhile, in image-to-text generation, UniCMs surpass Show-o on the MMMU benchmark while being 1.5 × faster at long-sequence generating speed.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs), despite their powerful capabilities, suffer from factual hallucinations where they generate verifiable falsehoods. We identify a root of this issue: the imbalanced data distribution in the pretraining corpus, which leads to a state of "low-probability truth" and "high-probability falsehood". Recent approaches, such as teaching models to say "I don’t know" or post-hoc knowledge editing, either evade the problem or face catastrophic forgetting. To address this issue from its root, we propose PretrainRL, a novel framework that integrates reinforcement learning into the pretraining phase to consolidate factual knowledge. The core principle of PretrainRL is "debiasing then learning." It actively reshapes the model’s probability distribution by down-weighting high-probability falsehoods, thereby making "room" for low-probability truths to be learned effectively. To enable this, we design an efficient negative sampling strategy to discover these high-probability falsehoods and introduce novel metrics to evaluate the model’s probabilistic state concerning factual knowledge. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks demonstrate that PretrainRL significantly alleviates factual hallucinations and outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated considerable potential for social simulation, yet struggle to accurately model individual value systems. Most existing methods mechanically stitch survey responses into prompts, which suffer from semantic fragmentation, failing to capture the internal coherence of human value systems. The value systems of LLMs are typically assessed using static multiple-choice questions, which fail to evaluate the value orientation in real-world dialogue interactions. To address these issues, we propose ExpertIVS, a framework employing 14 Sociological Expert Agents to interpret World Values Survey (WVS) responses through structured professional perspectives, rather than direct responses concatenation. These expert agents perform deep semantic reconstruction to generate robust and internally consistent individual profiles. To evaluate the consistency between LLMs and individual value systems during dynamic interactions, we further introduce a multi-agent debate mechanism. Extensive experiments across 480 individuals from 12 countries demonstrate that ExpertIVS achieves 90.78% value restoration fidelity and significantly outperforms baselines in value generalization (+5.3%). Moreover, ExpertIVS exhibits strong personality discriminability and behavioral consistency, enabling a shift from mere response concatenation to genuine sociological role-playing.

Abstract:
This paper investigates a critical design decision in the practice of massively multilingual continual pre-training — the inclusion of parallel data. Specifically, we study the impact of bilingual translation data for massively multilingual language adaptation of the Llama 3 family of models to 500 languages. To this end, we construct a bilingual translation corpus named OUR_DATA, containing data from more than 2,500 language pairs. Subsequently, we develop the OUR_MODEL Llama 3 suite of four massively multilingual models — continually pre-trained from the Llama 3 family of base models extensively on diverse data mixes up to 671B tokens — and explore the effect of continual pre-training with or without bilingual translation data. Comprehensive evaluation across 7 tasks and 12 benchmarks demonstrates that bilingual data tends to enhance language transfer and performance, particularly for low-resource languages. We open-source the OUR_DATA corpus, OUR_MODEL Llama 3 suite artefacts, code, and model generations.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in healthcare, yet they still encounter significant challenges in complex clinical decision-making scenarios. Existing benchmarks primarily assess LLM performance in single-course settings and lack systematic evaluation in multi-course scenarios, where a patient’s condition evolves over time. To address this gap, we propose ClinicalMC, a benchmark for multi-course clinical decision-making. It includes 1,275 Chinese and 5,804 English samples across four stages from admission to discharge. These stages cover triage, first-course examination/diagnosis/treatment, subsequent multi-course examination/assessment/treatment, and final diagnosis. In ClinicalMC, patients in the English dataset undergo an average of 5.11 clinical courses, whereas those in the Chinese dataset undergo 3.42. To assess LLM performance, we construct a multi-agent evaluation framework that includes patient, examiner, and doctor agents. Based on the benchmark and framework, we design two experimental settings—a single-turn static setting and a multi-turn dynamic setting—and assess three categories of LLMs: 1) closed-source LLMs like GPT-4o-mini; 2) open-source LLMs like DeepSeek-V3, and 3) medical LLMs like HuatuoGPT-o1. Through extensive evaluation, we aim to better understand LLM performance in the medical domain and support its effective deployment in healthcare.

Abstract:
Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) requires robust red teaming, yet the systematic synthesis of high-quality toxic data remains under-explored. We propose Reverse Constitutional AI (R-CAI), a framework for automated and controllable adversarial data generation that moves beyond isolated jailbreak prompts. By inverting a harmless constitution into a constitution of toxicity and iteratively refining model outputs through a critique–revision pipeline, R-CAI enables scalable synthesis of multi-dimensional adversarial data without human annotation. Optimizing solely for toxicity-related rewards, however, can lead to reward hacking and degraded semantic coherence. To address this challenge, we introduce probability clamping within reinforcement learning from AI feedback, which stabilizes adversarial optimization while preserving adversarial intent. Experiments demonstrate that R-CAI generates diverse, high-quality toxic data and that probability clamping substantially improves semantic coherence (15%) without sacrificing adversarial strength. Overall, R-CAI provides a fully automated framework for red teaming data generation and systematic safety evaluation of aligned language models.

Abstract:
With the remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in medicine, particularly their ability to support clinical decision-making in medical dialogues, a key limitation remains: the static reasoning patterns derived from human expert experience are often inadequate for the dynamic and diverse nature of real-world multi-turn conversations. While recent large reasoning models (such as R1) enable deeper and more complex thought processes to address such challenges, they also introduce significant redundancy. Meanwhile, recent studies on reusing atomic thoughts demonstrate a practical pathway toward dynamic and precise reasoning in general domains. In this paper, we investigate the role of atomic thought-based experience in medical dialogue tasks. First, we collect human expert clinical experience. Then, we propose a novel distillation framework that extracts atomic thoughts from teacher models and reuses them to guide reasoning and generate responses. Based on this framework, we construct training data from ReMeDi and fine-tune student models, which demonstrate enhanced performance in both static and interactive medical dialogue scenarios. Furthermore, we examine the impact of experience across various models, datasets, and scenarios. Crucially, transferring this experience empowers weaker models to generate high-quality reasoning data, matching the annotation capabilities of stronger LLMs while significantly reducing costs. The code is available in this repository https://github.com/VioletAmethystLunar/Atomic-Thoughts-Medical-Dialogue.

Abstract:
Combating hate speech on social media is critical for securing cyberspace, yet relies heavily on the efficacy of automated detection systems. As content formats evolve, hate speech is transitioning from solely plain text to complex multimodal expressions, making implicit attacks harder to spot. Current systems, however, often falter on these subtle cases, as they struggle with multimodal content where the emergent meaning transcends the aggregation of individual modalities. To bridge this gap, we move beyond binary classification to characterize semantic intent shifts where modalities interact to construct implicit hate from benign cues or neutralize toxicity through semantic inversion. Guided by this fine-grained formulation, we curate the Hate via Vision-Language Interplay (H-VLI) benchmark where the true intent hinges on the intricate interplay of modalities rather than overt visual or textual slurs. To effectively decipher these complex cues, we further propose the Asymmetric Reasoning via Courtroom Agent DEbate (ARCADE) framework. By simulating a judicial process where agents actively argue for accusation and defense, ARCADE forces the model to scrutinize deep semantic cues before reaching a verdict. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ARCADE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on H-VLI, particularly for challenging implicit cases, while maintaining competitive performance on established benchmarks. Our code and data are available at:https://github.com/Sayur1n/H-VLI

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are exhibiting emergent human-like abilities and are envisioned as the tool for simulating an individual’s communication patterns, behaviors, and personality traits. However, current evaluations of LLM-based persona simulation remain limited: most rely on synthetic dialogues and lack fine-grained analysis of the capability for persona simulation. To address these limitations, we introduce TwinVoice, a comprehensive benchmark for assessing persona simulation across diverse real-world contexts. TwinVoice encompasses three dimensions: Social Persona (public social interactions), Interpersonal Persona (private dialogues), and Narrative Persona (role-based expression). It further decomposes the evaluation into six fundamental capabilities, including opinion consistency, memory recall, logical reasoning, lexical fidelity, persona tone, and syntactic style. Experimental results reveal that while advanced models achieve moderate accuracy in persona simulation, they still fall short of capabilities such as syntactic style and memory recall. Our data, code, and evaluation results are available.

Abstract:
Multimodal representation alignment is pivotal for large language models and robotics. Traditional methods are often hindered by cross-modal information discrepancies and data scarcity, leading to suboptimal alignment spaces that overlook modality-unique features. We propose CodeBind, a framework that optimizes multimodal representation spaces through a modality-shared-specific codebook design. By incrementally aligning target and bridging modalities, CodeBind bypasses the need for fully paired data. Unlike traditional hard alignment, CodeBind decomposes features into shared components for semantic consistency and specific components for modality-unique details. This design utilizes a compositional vector quantization scheme, where a shared codebook bridges modality gaps and modality-specific codebooks mitigate representation bias by preventing dominant modalities from overshadowing others. Validated across nine modalities (text, image, video, audio, depth, thermal, tactile, 3D point cloud, EEG), CodeBind achieves state-of-the-art performance in multimodal classification and retrieval tasks. Project page: https://visual-ai.github.io/codebind

Abstract:
Chain-of-Thought reasoning is widely used to improve the interpretability of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), yet the faithfulness of the generated reasoning traces remains unclear. Prior work has mainly focused on perceptual hallucinations, leaving reasoning level unfaithfulness underexplored. To isolate faithfulness from linguistic priors, we introduce SPD-Faith Bench, a diagnostic benchmark based on fine-grained image difference reasoning that enforces explicit visual comparison. Evaluations on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal two systematic failure modes, perceptual blindness and perception-reasoning dissociation. We trace these failures to decaying visual attention and representation shifts in the residual stream. Guided by this analysis, we propose SAGE, a train-free visual evidence-calibrated framework that improves visual routing and aligns reasoning with perception. Our results highlight the importance of explicitly evaluating faithfulness beyond response correctness. Our benchmark and codes are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SPD-Faith/.

Abstract:
Echocardiography analysis demands a dual capability: rigorous quantitative keyframe localization for evidence verification and comprehensive qualitative synthesis for diagnostic reporting. However, current Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to meet these clinical requirements due to a misalignment with diagnostic workflows, a scarcity of video instruction data, and the critical challenge of cyclic temporal ambiguity—where the repetitive nature of cardiac cycles renders standard single-frame supervision ill-posed. To bridge this gap, we introduce EchoMLLM, a unified framework designed for real-world echocardiography video understanding. First, we align model capabilities with clinical needs by defining two fine-grained tasks: cycle- and pathology-conditioned keyframe grounding and video report generation. To facilitate this, we curate EchoMM-120k, a large-scale instruction dataset specifically constructed to support temporal localization and professional reporting. Furthermore, to resolve the cyclic ambiguity, we propose a multi-stage training paradigm incorporating a novel cycle-aware Reinforcement Learning (RL) strategy. By prioritizing logical consistency over rigid index matching, our approach moves beyond rote memorization to elicit invariant reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EchoMLLM reduces temporal grounding errors by up to 76% and improves report generation quality by 65% over its backbone, achieving state-of-the-art performance against both generalist and medical baselines.

Abstract:
Despite recent advances in speech-to-speech translation (S2ST), it remains difficult to achieve both high translation accuracy and practical flexibility. In this paper, we present S2ST-Omni, a compositional S2ST framework that integrates a high-accuracy speech-to-text translation (S2TT) frontend with a modular, plug-and-play text-to-speech (TTS) backend, enabling independent optimization of translation and synthesis. On the S2TT side, we introduce a hybrid adapter that follows a "local-then-global" strategy to bridge the pretrained Whisper encoder and Qwen3 LLM, yielding a hierarchical acoustic-to-semantic abstraction. Building on this bridge, we further propose a hierarchical language-aware architecture that injects source-language information at two complementary levels. At the acoustic level, Language-Aware Dual-CTC operates on intermediate adapter features and employs FiLM-style feature modulation with a learnable gate, encouraging the model to learn language-specific but content-faithful acoustic representations. At the linguistic level, Language-Aware Prompting dynamically constructs source-language-conditioned prompts that activate language-specific translation knowledge in the LLM. To enable efficient optimization, we design a task-specific progressive fine-tuning strategy that first stabilizes speech-text alignment and then improves translation via LoRA on top of this converged foundation. The TTS backend remains fully modular and can be instantiated with any state-of-the-art synthesizer without retraining the S2TT frontend. Experiments on CVSS-C show that S2ST-Omni consistently achieves the best BLEU and ASR-BLEU across French, German, and Spanish to English directions, outperforming strong recent S2ST baselines.

Abstract:
Understanding where transformer language models encode psychologically meaningful aspects of meaning is essential for both theory and practice. We conduct a systematic layer-wise probing study of 58 psycholinguistic features across 10 transformer models, spanning encoder-only and decoder-only architectures, and compare three embedding extraction methods. We find that apparent localization of meaning is strongly method-dependent: contextualized embeddings yield higher feature-specific selectivity and different layer-wise profiles than isolated embeddings. Across models and methods, final-layer representations are rarely optimal for recovering psycholinguistic information with linear probes. Despite these differences, models exhibit a shared depth ordering of meaning dimensions, with lexical properties peaking earlier and experiential and affective dimensions peaking later. Together, these results show that where meaning “lives” in transformer models reflects an interaction between methodological choices and architectural constraints.

Abstract:
Existing multimodal emotion and intent recognition tasks predominantly focus on classification, overlooking the underlying rationale and intrinsic connections between these states. Bridging this gap, we propose Joint Multimodal Emotion-Intent Explanation and Classification, JX4MEI, a novel task requiring the model to jointly predict emotion and intent, while generating natural language explanations for why they co-occur. To support this, we present XMEI-dataset, a large-scale benchmark of 15,461 multimodal samples spanning 7 emotion and 9 intent categories across text, audio, and visual modalities. Unlike prior works, our dataset provides fine-grained rationales for emotion, intent, and their causal interplay, curated via a rigorous pipeline involving Chain-of-Thought generation and strict human refinement to eliminate model artifacts. Furthermore, we propose XMEI-Qwen, a model equipped with a novel Language-Query Former (LQ-Former). By leveraging modality-specific captions as semantic queries, LQ-Former injects explicit semantic guidance into feature alignment, significantly enhancing reasoning capabilities. Empirical experiments demonstrate that XMEI-Qwen sets a new state-of-the-art on the JX4MEI task, outperforming competitive baselines in both prediction and explanation generation. Code: https://github.com/OrangeYeah1027/JX4MEI.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Large Language Models have fostered a new class of generative linguistic steganography, claim “provably secure” by theoretically aligning the steganographic distribution with the language model’s natural distribution. We challenge this premise by exposing Low-Probability Vanishing (LPV), an inevitable vulnerability arising from finite-precision arithmetic. To exploit this, we propose RRNs-HT, a novel steganalysis framework based on Representative Random Numbers and Hypothesis Testing, which transforms the detection task from semantic classification to a statistical audit of the sampling mechanism. Crucially, unlike previous work that contrasts machine text against human text, we validate our method in a rigorous homologous setting to strictly isolate sampling artifacts. Experiments demonstrate that RRNs-HT effectively breaks the security of AC and Meteor with high detection accuracy, whereas state-of-the-art semantic steganalyzers degrade to random guessing. Our findings prove that theoretical security is unattainable in practice without addressing finite-precision leakage.

Abstract:
Voice imitation aims to transform source speech to match a reference speaker’s timbre and speaking style while preserving linguistic content. A straightforward approach is to train on triplets of (source, reference, target), where source and target share the same content but target matches the reference’s voice characteristics, yet such data is extremely scarce. Existing approaches either employ carefully designed disentanglement architectures to bypass this data scarcity or leverage external systems to synthesize pseudo-parallel training data. However, the former requires intricate model design, and the latter faces a quality ceiling when synthetic speech is used as training targets. To address these limitations, we propose MimicLM, which takes a novel approach by using synthetic speech as training sources while retaining real recordings as targets. This design enables the model to learn directly from real speech distributions, breaking the synthetic quality ceiling. Building on this data construction approach, we incorporate interleaved text-audio modeling to guide the generation of content-accurate speech and apply post-training with preference alignment to mitigate the inherent distributional mismatch when training on synthetic data. Experiments demonstrate that MimicLM achieves superior voice imitation quality with a simple yet effective architecture, significantly outperforming existing methods in naturalness while maintaining competitive similarity scores across speaker identity, accent, and emotion dimensions.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive reasoning capabilities in agents for complex interactive environments. However, these agents often suffer from hallucinations and lack grounding, leading to unreliable actions that conflict with real-world constraints. Existing approaches mitigate some issues through implicit imitation or sparse reinforcement learning but rely on fitting data distributions without explicitly understanding environmental constraints, often generating actions that are behaviorally distorted or environmentally impermissible. To address this, we introduce OntoGuard, an ontological framework designed to guard LLM agents by enforcing environmental and behavioral admissibility. These constraints are constructed by extracting knowledge from oracle demonstrations, supplemented with world knowledge inherent in LLMs and general knowledge bases. During inference, OntoGuard functions as an active interceptor, using a graph-based constraint-checking mechanism to reject invalid actions and prompt self-correction before acting. Experiments on both ScienceWorld and VirtualHome demonstrate OntoGuard’s advantage over state-of-the-art methods, validating its ability to enforce physical and behavioral constraints while preventing invalid actions.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) encode substantial knowledge in their parameters, which can be located, traced, and analyzed. Despite recent progress in neural interpretability, it is still unclear how to transfer such knowledge in a fine-grained manner, namely parametric knowledge transfer (PKT). A central challenge is to make cross-scale transfer effective and efficient when source and target models differ in architecture and parameterization. Existing methods that directly reuse layer parameters are therefore strongly limited by neural incompatibility. In this paper, we identify latent semantic alignment as the key prerequisite for cross-scale knowledge transfer. Instead of directly moving layer parameters, our approach uses activations as the transfer medium. SemAlign has two stages: an layer attribution stage that attributes task-relevant source layers and selects exactly one source layer for each target layer, and a semantic alignment stage that pairs them from shallow to deep and optimizes the target with source-side supervisory hidden states. The alignment is carried out in latent space. In the current realization, training follows a shallow-to-deep frontier schedule: at each stage, only the current target layer is trainable, the layer objective is a Fisher-weighted quadratic surrogate on target-space aligned logits, and the final output layer keeps KL distillation. The transferred object nonetheless remains the aligned representation itself. Evaluations on four benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of our method. Further analysis reveals the key factors that ease cross-scale knowledge transfer and provides insights into the nature of latent semantic alignment.

Abstract:
We introduce INDOTABVQA, a benchmark for evaluating cross-lingual Table Visual Question Answering (VQA) on real-world document images in Bahasa Indonesia. The dataset comprises 1,593 document images across three visual styles (bordered, borderless, and colorful) with one or more tables, and 1,593 question-answer sets in four languages: Bahasa Indonesia, English, Hindi, and Arabic. This enables evaluation of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in both monolingual (Bahasa documents with Bahasa questions) and cross-lingual settings (Bahasa documents with questions in other languages). We benchmark leading open-source VLMs (Qwen2.5-VL, Gemma- 3, LLaMA-3.2) and GPT-4o and reveal substantial performance gaps, particularly on structurally complex tables and in low-resource languages. Fine-tuning a compact 3B model and a LoRA- finetuned 7B model on our dataset yields 11.6% and 17.8% improvements in accuracy. Providing explicit table region coordinates as additional input further improves performance by 4-7%, demonstrating the value of Spatial priors for table-based reasoning. Our findings underscore the importance of language- diverse, domain-specific datasets and demonstrate that targeted fine-tuning can significantly enhance VLM performance on specialized document understanding tasks. INDOTABVQA provides a valuable resource for advancing research in cross-lingual, structure-aware document understanding, especially in underrepresented regions of the world. The dataset is publicly available via Hugging Face at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/NusaBharat/INDOTABVQA.

Abstract:
Autoregressive (AR) language modeling remains the dominant paradigm due to its dense supervision signal and highly optimized serving infrastructure, but its strictly causal, token-by-token decoding limits parallelism and non-causal modeling. While masked diffusion offers a promising path toward parallel generation, it faces two critical bottlenecks: training inefficiency stemming from sparse masked objectives, and high latency caused by iterative whole-sequence denoising. We present a systematic study of blockwise discrete diffusion, a pragmatic middle ground that preserves AR-compatible serving while enabling parallel intra-block generation. Our study proceeds in four steps: (i) a controlled, compute- and scale-matched comparison revealing that AR is a more effective backbone for blockwise hybrids than masked diffusion objectives; (ii) a scalable conversion recipe, SDAR , validating that AR models spanning 1.7B to 30B parameters can be adapted into block diffusion models with minimal compute while preserving backbone capabilities; and (iii) a systematic characterization of decoding dynamics , which reveals a virtuous cycle where larger models enable more aggressive parallel decoding, achieving theoretical speedups over 5 × and wall-clock speedups of 2.3 × on H200 GPUs in latency-critical regimes; and (iv) an investigation of local non-causal modeling capabilities , showing that SDAR’s local bidirectional attention overcomes causal bottlenecks in scientific domains (e.g., chemistry) and enables robust test-time scaling. We release the full model suite, the training framework, and our inference engines for further innovation in non-autoregressive generative paradigms.

Abstract:
To develop a reliable AI for psychological assessment, we introduce PsychEval, a multi-session, multi-therapy, and highly realistic benchmark designed to address three key challenges:1) Can we train a highly realistic AI counselor? Realistic counseling is a longitudinal task requiring sustained memory and dynamic goal tracking. We propose a multi-session benchmark (spanning 6-10 sessions across three distinct stages) that demands critical capabilities such as memory continuity, adaptive reasoning, and longitudinal planning. The dataset is annotated with extensive professional skills, comprising over 677 meta-skills and 4577 atomic skills. 2) How to train a multi-therapy AI counselor? While existing models often focus on a single therapy, complex cases frequently require flexible strategies among various therapies. We construct a diverse dataset covering five therapeutic modalities alongside an integrative therapy with a unified three-stage clinical framework across six core psychological topics. 3) How to systematically evaluate an AI counselor? We establish a holistic evaluation framework with 18 therapy-specific and therapy-shared metrics across Client-Level and Counselor-Level dimensions. To We also construct over 2,000 diverse client profiles. Extensive experimental analysis fully validates the superior quality and clinical fidelity of our dataset.Our datasets and evaluation framework are anonymously available at this repository.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as intelligent agents that reason, plan, and interact with their environments. To effectively scale to long-horizon scenarios, a key capability for such agents is a memory mechanism that can retain, organize, and retrieve past experiences to support downstream decision-making. However, most existing approaches organize and store memories in a flat manner and rely on simple similarity-based retrieval techniques. Even when structured memory is introduced, existing methods often struggle to explicitly capture the logical relationships among experiences or memory units. Moreover, memory access is largely detached from the constructed structure and still depends on shallow semantic retrieval, preventing agents from reasoning logically over long-horizon dependencies. In this work, we propose CompassMem, an event-centric memory framework inspired by Event Segmentation Theory. CompassMem organizes memory as an Event Graph by incrementally segmenting experiences into events and linking them through explicit logical relations. This graph serves as a logic map, enabling agents to perform structured and goal-directed navigation over memory beyond superficial retrieval, progressively gathering valuable memories to support long-horizon reasoning. Experiments on LoCoMo and NarrativeQA demonstrate that CompassMem consistently improves both retrieval and reasoning performance across multiple backbone models.

Abstract:
Dialogue summarization (DS) plays a vital role in improving customer service efficiency by automatically generating concise summaries from lengthy multi-turn dialogues. However, existing studies largely overlook the fine-grained sentiment dynamics expressed by customers, and most DS datasets lack detailed sentiment annotations. These limitations hinder both accurate service quality assessment and the development of sentiment-aware summarization models. To address these challenges, we propose a three-stage approach to building an aspect-aware sentiment dataset, comprising: (1) aspect-anchored dialogue rewriting, (2) dialogue-anchored explainable label generation, and (3) label-dialogue integrated summarization. Building upon this scheme, we construct FOCUS, a F ine-grained customer- O riented C hinese dialog U e S ummarization dataset. FOCUS is the first Chinese dataset with 12,948 dialogues annotated for multi-level aspects, sentiment polarity, opinion content, emotions, as well as customer-oriented formatted and free-style sentiment summaries. To demonstrate the challenges and utility of FOCUS, we benchmark a range of summarization models on FOCUS and observe that current methods often exhibit misalignment between aspects and sentiments. Meanwhile, we find that a Chain-of-Thought approach can enhance faithfulness and interpretability, highlighting promising directions for future research on this dataset. FOCUS serves as a valuable resource to advance research in sentiment-aware DS and related tasks.

Abstract:
Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is easy to evaluate but adds a meta-task: models must both solve the problem and output the symbol that represents the answer, conflating reasoning errors with symbol-binding failures. We study how language models implement MCQA internally using representational analyses (PCA, linear probes) as well as causal interventions. We find that option-boundary (newline) residual states often contain strong linearly decodable signals related to per-option correctness. Winner-identity probing reveals a two-stage progression: the winning content position becomes decodable immediately after the final option is processed, while the output symbol is represented closer to the answer emission position. Tests under symbol and content permutations support a two-stage mechanism in which models first select a winner in content space and then bind or route that winner to the appropriate symbol to emit.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning, with its interpretable path reasoning, has emerged as a promising paradigm for multi-hop question answering over knowledge graphs. However, existing approaches suffer from two inherent limitations: (1) lacking effective intermediate guidance, agents often fall into aimless exploration when confronted with complex multi-hop questions; and (2) policy networks focus on local neighborhood information, making it difficult to anticipate the long-term consequences of decisions. To address these challenges, we propose a Progressive Planning and Reinforced Reasoning (PPRR) framework. Specifically, we introduce large language models as multi-hop reasoning planners, converting decomposed sub-question sequences into stepwise decision guidance and thereby granting the agent human-like, step-by-step problem-solving capabilities. In addition, we design a structure-aware lookahead policy network, which explicitly models inter-node dependencies along the multi-hop reasoning process and performs lookahead value evaluations for candidate actions, thereby enhancing the agent’s global state awareness and decision foresight in complex environments. Finally, we conducted extensive experiments on four public multi-hop question answering benchmarks and one domain-specific dataset. The results demonstrate that our framework surpasses state-of-the-art methods while demonstrating strong generalization.

Abstract:
Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is an expert-level task that relies on long-horizon reasoning and coherent modeling actions. Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable advancements in enabling language agents to tackle real-world tasks. Notably, there has been no investigation into how tool-using LLMs optimally interact with CAD engines, hindering the emergence of LLM-based agentic text-to-CAD modeling systems. We propose ToolCAD, a novel agentic CAD framework deploying LLMs as tool-using agents for text-to-CAD generation. Furthermore, we introduce an interactive CAD modeling gym to rollout reasoning and tool-augmented interaction trajectories with the CAD engine, incorporating hybrid feedback and human supervision. Meanwhile, an end-to-end post-training strategy is presented to enable the LLM agent to elicit refined CAD Modeling Chain of Thought (CAD-CoT) and evolve into proficient CAD tool-using agents via online curriculum reinforcement learning. Our findings demonstrate ToolCAD fills the gap in adopting and training open-source LLMs for CAD tool-using agents, enabling them to perform comparably to proprietary models, paving the way for more accessible and robust autonomous text-to-CAD modeling systems.

Abstract:
Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) is critical for the efficient deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs). While 4-bit quantization is widely regarded as an optimal trade-off, reducing the precision to 2-bit usually triggers a catastrophic “performance cliff.” It remains unclear whether the underlying mechanisms differ fundamentally. Consequently, we conduct a systematic mechanistic analysis, revealing two qualitatively distinct failure modes: Signal Degradation, where the computational patterns remain intact but information precision is impaired by cumulative error; and Computation Collapse, where key components fail to function, preventing correct information processing and destroying the signal in the early layers. Guided by this diagnosis, we conduct mechanism-aware interventions, demonstrating that targeted, training-free repair can mitigate Signal Degradation, but remains ineffective for Computation Collapse. Our findings provide a systematic diagnostic framework for PTQ failures and suggest that addressing Computation Collapse requires structural reconstruction rather than mere compensation.

Abstract:
Safety alignment in Large Language Models is critical for healthcare; however, reliance on binary refusal boundaries often results in over-refusal of benign queries or unsafe compliance with harmful ones. While existing benchmarks measure these extremes, they fail to evaluate Safe Completion: the model’s ability to maximise helpfulness on dual-use or borderline queries by providing safe, high-level guidance without crossing into actionable harm. We introduce Health-ORSC-Bench, the first large-scale benchmark designed to systematically measure Over-Refusal and Safe Completion quality in healthcare. Comprising 31,920 benign boundary prompts across seven health categories (e.g., self-harm, medical misinformation), our framework uses an automated pipeline with human validation to test models at varying levels of intent ambiguity. We evaluate 30 state-of-the-art LLMs, including GPT-5 and Claude-4, revealing a significant tension: safety-optimised models frequently refuse up to 80% of "Hard" benign prompts, while domain-specific models often sacrifice safety for utility. Our findings demonstrate that model family and size significantly influence calibration: larger frontier models (e.g., GPT-5, Llama-4) exhibit "safety-pessimism" and higher over-refusal than smaller or MoE-based counterparts (e.g., Qwen-3-Next), highlighting that current LLMs struggle to balance refusal and compliance. Health-ORSC-Bench provides a rigorous standard for calibrating the next generation of medical AI assistants toward nuanced, safe, and helpful completions. Our code and data is available at: https://github.com/ZhihaoZhang97/Health-ORSC-Bench . Warning: Some contents may include toxic or undesired contents.

Abstract:
A fundamental challenge in creative writing lies in reconciling the inherent tension between maintaining global coherence in long-form narratives and preserving local expressiveness in short-form texts. While long-context generation necessitates explicit macroscopic planning, short-form creativity often demands spontaneous, constraint-free expression. Existing alignment paradigms, however, typically employ static reward signals and rely heavily on high-quality supervised data, which is costly and difficult to scale. To address this, we propose UniCreative, a unified reference-free reinforcement learning framework. We first introduce AC-GenRM, an adaptive constraint-aware reward model that dynamically synthesizes query-specific criteria to provide fine-grained preference judgments. Leveraging these signals, we propose ACPO, a policy optimization algorithm that aligns models with human preferences across both content quality and structural paradigms without supervised fine-tuning and ground-truth references. Empirical results demonstrate that AC-GenRM aligns closely with expert evaluations, while ACPO significantly enhances performance across diverse writing tasks. Crucially, our analysis reveals an emergent meta-cognitive ability: the model learns to autonomously differentiate between tasks requiring rigorous planning and those favoring direct generation, validating the effectiveness of our direct alignment approach.

Abstract:
Diffusion policies have demonstrated exceptional performance in embodied AI. However, their iterative denoising process results in high latency, and existing acceleration methods often sacrifice physical consistency. To address this, we propose ElasticFlow, a distillation-free, physics-consistent one-step policy framework. We reconstruct the Mean Field Theory by directly modeling the average velocity field, enabling a direct single-step mapping from noise to action. Addressing the Temporal Heterogeneity of robotic tasks, we introduce the Elastic Time Horizons mechanism. This mechanism effectively overcomes Spectral Bias by explicitly encoding control granularity, achieving efficient alignment between semantic instructions and physical execution horizons. Experiments on benchmarks such as LIBERO, CALVIN, and RoboTwin demonstrate that ElasticFlow achieves efficient 1-NFE inference (approximately 71Hz). Furthermore, it outperforms state-of-the-art methods, including OpenVLA and 𝜋 0 , on long-horizon tasks, highlighting its potential for efficient, robust, and semantically aligned control.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved significant success in understanding static pre-recorded video scenarios (e.g., event-centric or narrative-driven content). However, existing MLLMs are largely trained on datasets restricted to static content due to the scarcity of high-quality interleaved data, causing them to struggle with dynamic interactions. Distinct from pre-recorded videos, live streaming is characterized by high-density, interleaved multimodal turns, where viewer comments (danmaku) are tightly coupled with real-time audio-visual evidence and evolving dialogue context. In such settings, purely textual annotations fail to capture fine-grained visual and temporal dependencies. To bridge this gap, we introduce Live-Aid, the first large-scale interleaved live interaction Chinese dataset with human-annotated, temporally aligned video responses, spanning over 1,100 hours and 80,037 dialogue turns across 8,053 video sessions. Building on this, we leverage these high-quality annotations within a novel multi-agent pipeline to construct evaluation tasks targeting core capabilities of live interactions. Extensive evaluations of strong Video-LLMs and Omni-LLMs reveal critical limitations in interleaved multi-turn interactions requiring temporal reasoning, highlighting the value of Live-Aid in advancing interleaved multimodal reasoning and dynamic audio-visual dependencies.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are currently applied to scientific paper evaluation by assigning an absolute score to each paper independently. However, since score scales vary across conferences, time periods, and evaluation criteria, models trained on absolute scores are prone to fitting narrow, context-specific rules rather than developing robust scholarly judgment. To overcome this limitation, we propose shifting paper evaluation from isolated scoring to collaborative ranking. In particular, we design a C omparison- N ative framework for P aper E valuation ( CNPE ), integrating comparison into both data construction and model learning. We first propose a graph-based similarity ranking algorithm to facilitate the sampling of more informative and discriminative paper pairs from a collection. We then enhance relative quality judgment through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with comparison-based rewards. At inference, the model performs pairwise comparisons over sampled paper pairs and aggregates these preference signals into a global relative quality ranking. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves an average relative improvement of 21.8 % over the strong baseline DeepReview-14B, while exhibiting robust generalization to five previously unseen datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/ComparisonReview.

Abstract:
Large Language Models have achieved impressive results in general reasoning tasks. However, they still face significant challenges when applied to temporal knowledge graph question answering (TKGQA), particularly exhibiting broken temporal reasoning chains and a lack of dynamic error-correction. These limitations hinder their capacity to handle complex temporal logic and make it difficult to recover once a reasoning error occurs. To address this issue, we propose Regret-Now, a novel LLM-based temporal reasoning framework inspired by the physical principle of minimum potential energy. Regret-Now models the reasoning process as a dynamic trajectory moving toward a more stable state, where each step is expected to a lower potential energy. We introduce the Regret Stage that evaluates the “potential energy” of each intermediate reasoning step and triggers real-time rollback if an abnormal rise in potential energy is detected—indicating a likely error. We evaluate Regret-Now on two standard TKGQA benchmarks: CronQuestions and MultiTQ. Experimental results show consistent gains over strong baselines, validating physics-inspired modeling for LLM-based TKGQA. The code can be found at https://github.com/h-yii/Regret-Now.

Abstract:
Recently, embedding resources, including models, benchmarks, and datasets, have been widely released to support a variety of languages. However, the Dutch language remains underrepresented, typically comprising only a small fraction of the published multilingual resources. To address this gap and encourage the further development of Dutch embeddings, we introduce new resources for their evaluation and generation. First, we introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark for Dutch (MTEB-NL), which includes both existing Dutch datasets and newly created ones, covering a wide range of tasks. Second, we provide a training dataset compiled from available Dutch retrieval datasets, complemented with synthetic data generated by large language models to expand task coverage beyond retrieval. Finally, we release a series of E5-NL compact yet efficient embedding models that demonstrate strong performance across multiple tasks. We make our resources publicly available through the Hugging Face Hub and the MTEB package.

Abstract:
Recent advances in Multimodal Entity Linking (MEL) exploit textual and visual information to disambiguate mentions and align them with entities in a knowledge base. Existing methods typically design separate and complex network modules for each type of interaction among multi-granular and multimodal features, while lacking explicit modeling of the joint dependencies among these features. Moreover, most approaches rely on unidirectional retrieval-based matching and lack knowledge-driven verification, leading to unreliable disambiguation in weak-context scenarios. To address these challenges, we propose a novel two-stage MEL framework termed ThinkLinker. First, we introduce a low-rank fusion mechanism to model the joint dependencies among multi-granular and multimodal features, enabling comprehensive and explicit interactions while learning task-relevant discriminative information for candidate ranking in a lower-dimensional space. Subsequently, we develop a bidirectional retrieval-verification paradigm, where the ranked candidate entities guide an LLM-based multi-turn, dialogue-style verification process to generate mention-specific contextual augmentation. The augmented context is then adaptively fused with the original representation to further refine the linking model. Experimental results on public benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed ThinkLinker outperforms all state-of-the-art baselines. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/zhouyuanyu/ThinkLinker.

Abstract:
Synthetic data is increasingly critical for contact centers, where privacy constraints and data scarcity limit the availability of real conversations. However, generating synthetic dialogues that are realistic and useful for downstream applications remains challenging. In this work, we benchmark multiple generation strategies guided by structured supervision on call attributes (Intent Summaries, Topic Flows, and Quality Assurance (QA) Forms) across multiple languages. To test downstream utility, we evaluate synthetic transcripts on an automated quality assurance (AutoQA) task, finding that prompts optimized on real transcripts consistently outperform those optimized on synthetic transcripts. These results suggest that current synthetic transcripts fall short in capturing the full realism of real agent–customer interactions. To highlight these downstream gaps, we introduce a diagnostic evaluation framework comprising 17 metrics across four dimensions: (1) Emotional and Sentiment Arcs, (2) Linguistic Complexity, (3) Interaction Style, and (4) Conversational Properties. Our analysis shows that even with structured supervision, current generation strategies exhibit measurable deficiencies in sentiment fidelity, disfluency modeling, behavioral variation, and conversational realism. Together, these results highlight the importance of diagnostic, metric-driven evaluation for synthetic conversation generation intended for downstream applications.

Abstract:
Mathematical information retrieval (MIR) depends on jointly modeling natural-language context and mathematical expressions. While BERT-based dense retrievers are effective, they often dilute mathematical semantics because textual content dominates most training data and mathematical formulas differ fundamentally from natural language in structure and composition. Consequently, these models rely heavily on surrounding text, which reduces robustness in math-intensive scenarios with limited textual description. We propose MaRF, a dual-encoder representation-level fusion framework for MIR that explicitly integrates formula semantics into context-aware dense retrieval. By combining contextual and formula-specific representations, MaRF captures complementary information from both textual and symbolic views. Experiments on the ARQMath-3 benchmark demonstrate that MaRF substantially improves retrieval performance and robustness, outperforming strong baselines across MIR tasks. The source code and datasets are available at https://github.com/MLPgroup/MaRF.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on complex mathematical benchmarks yet sometimes fail on basic math reasoning while generating unnecessarily verbose responses. In this paper, we present LLMThinkBench, a systematic benchmark and comprehensive empirical study to evaluate the efficiency of reasoning in LLMs, focusing on the fundamental tradeoff between accuracy and overthinking. First, we formalize the accuracy-verbosity tradeoff. Second, we introduce the Overthinking Score, a harmonic-mean metric combining accuracy and token-efficiency for holistic model evaluation. Third, we establish an evaluation protocol with dynamically-generated data across 14 basic math tasks. Fourth, we conduct a large-scale empirical study evaluating 53 LLMs, including reasoning and quantized variants across different reasoning budgets. Fifth, we release LLMThinkBench as an open-source Python package and public leaderboard for reproducibility. Our findings reveal: 1) model performance on complex benchmarks does not translate directly to basic math reasoning; 2) reasoning models generate ∼ 18 × more tokens while sometimes achieving lower accuracy and exhibit catastrophic collapse when tokens are constrained, dropping by up to ∼ 36%; 3) the accuracy-verbosity relationship is non-monotonic with extended reasoning budgets yielding diminishing returns (GPT-5/o-series models show zero accuracy gain from low → medium → high reasoning effort). Our findings challenge the assumption that longer reasoning in LLMs necessarily improves mathematical reasoning. Our public leaderboard is available at https://ctrl-gaurav.github.io/LLMThinkBench/. Our open-source Python package is available at https://pypi.org/project/llmthinkbench/, and the codebase can be found at https://github.com/ctrl-gaurav/LLMThinkBench for easy and reproducible evaluation.

Abstract:
Text-to-SQL systems often struggle with deep contextual understanding, particularly for complex queries with subtle requirements.We present PV-SQL, an agentic framework that addresses these failures through two complementary components: Probe and Verify. The Probe component iteratively generates probing queries to retrieve concrete records from the database, resolving ambiguities in value formats, column semantics, and inter-table relationships to build richer contextual understanding. The Verify component employs a rule-based method to extract verifiable conditions and construct an executable checklist, enabling iterative SQL refinement that effectively reduces missing constraints. Experiments on the BIRD benchmarks show that PV-SQL outperforms the best text-to-SQL baseline by 5% in execution accuracy and 20.8% in valid efficiency score while consuming fewer tokens.

Abstract:
Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state-of-the- art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.

Abstract:
VLMs provide visual information alongside their predictions, but it remains unclear whether consistency in such information implies consistent decisions. We study this question in a controlled medical-imaging setting using brain MRI with pathology-confirmed labels and expert lesion annotations. For each human subject and modality, we construct configurations that retain the lesion content while varying surrounding context and scale and measure decision flips together with consistency in model-reported influential slices. Across four diverse VLMs (including proprietary, open-source, and domain-specific models), flip rates reach up to 75% across lesion-containing presentations, often despite high overlap in reported evidence. When lesion-related content is removed, proprietary models rarely produce a categorical diagnosis, with abstention rates ranging from 63% to 99%. These results reveal a mismatch between reported evidence and decisions, motivating evaluation beyond accuracy. Our evaluation dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face.

Abstract:
While humans are inherently social creatures, the challenge of identifying when and how to assist and collaborate with others - particularly when pursuing independent goals - can hinder cooperation. To address this challenge, we aim to develop an AI system that provides useful feedback to promote prosocial behaviour - actions that benefit others, even when not directly aligned with one’s own goals. We introduce ProToM, a Theory of Mind-informed facilitator that promotes prosocial actions in multi-agent systems by providing targeted, context-sensitive feedback to individual agents. ProToM first infers agents’ goals using Bayesian inverse planning, then selects feedback to communicate by maximising expected utility, conditioned on the inferred goal distribution. We evaluate our approach against baselines in two multi-agent environments: Doors, Keys, and Gems, as well as Overcooked. Our results suggest that state-of-the-art large language and reasoning models fall short of communicating feedback that is both contextually grounded and well-timed - leading to higher communication overhead and lower success rates. In contrast, ProToM provides targeted and helpful feedback, achieving a higher success rate, shorter task completion times, and is consistently preferred by human users.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance reasoning capabilities through test-time scaling by generating multiple traces. However, the combination of lengthy reasoning traces with multiple sampling introduces substantial computation and high end-to-end latency. Prior work on accelerating this process has relied on similarity-based or confidence-based pruning, but these signals do not reliably indicate trace quality. To address these limitations, we propose STEP: Step-level Trace Evaluation and Pruning, a novel pruning framework that evaluates reasoning steps using hidden states and dynamically prunes unpromising traces during generation. We train a lightweight step scorer to estimate trace quality, and design a GPU memory-aware pruning strategy that triggers pruning as the GPU memory is saturated by KV cache to reduce end-to-end latency. Experiments across challenging reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that STEP reduces end-to-end inference latency by 45%–70% on average compared to self-consistency while also improving reasoning accuracy.

Abstract:
Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets often exhibit human label variation. To better understand these variations, explanation-based approaches analyze the underlying reasoning behind annotators’ decisions. One such approach is the LiTEx taxonomy, which categorizes free-text explanations in English into reasoning categories. However, previous work applying LiTEx has focused on within-label variation: cases where annotators agree on the NLI label but provide different explanations. This paper broadens the scope by examining how annotators may diverge not only in the reasoning category but also in the labeling. We use explanations as a lens to analyze variation in NLI annotations and to examine individual differences in reasoning. We apply LiTEx to two NLI datasets and align annotation variation from multiple aspects: NLI label agreement, explanation similarity, and taxonomy agreement, with an additional compounding factor of annotators’ selection bias. We observe instances where annotators disagree on the label but provide similar explanations, suggesting that surface-level disagreement may mask underlying agreement in interpretation. Moreover, our analysis reveals individual preferences in explanation strategies and label choices. These findings highlight that agreement in reasoning categories better reflects the semantic similarity of explanations than label agreement alone. Our findings underscore the richness of reasoning-based explanations and the need for caution in treating labels as ground truth.

Abstract:
While Large Language Model (LLM) safety has focused on single-agent, white-box settings, the adoption of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) creates a critical blind spot: supply chain vulnerabilities in MAS ecosystems . These systems often rely on third-party agents accessed via black-box APIs, creating risks where attackers can embed hidden triggers to manipulate collective reasoning or outputs. Because internal weights are inaccessible, traditional white-box defenses fail to detect these threats. Consequently, a critical gap exists in auditing these systems for ”Trojan” agents, i.e. , malicious models that behave normally until triggered by specific, often multi-turn, conversational contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce the C onversational T rojan U nmasking S ystem ( CTUS ), a black-box auditing framework that leverages an Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) to autonomously expose hidden threats. Drawing on social deduction mechanics, CTUS deploys a ”Judge” agent to evolve conversational probes that provoke Trojan agents into revealing their malicious nature without alerting benign peers. We validate CTUS across diverse architectures (Llama-2/3, Gemma, Mistral) and attack vectors (word, syntax, semantic, RLHF). Our results demonstrate that CTUS achieves superior detection rates (up to 100% in specific configurations). Furthermore, we conduct rigorous analyses to confirm the framework’s robustness, exhibiting negligible false positives on benign systems and stability across system configurations, establishing CTUS as a scalable safeguard for the multi-agent landscape.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) suffer significant performance degradation when user instructions and context are distributed over multiple conversational turns, yet multi-turn (MT) interactions dominate chat interfaces. The routine approach of appending full chat history to prompts rapidly exhausts context windows, leading to increased latency, higher computational costs, and diminishing returns as conversations extend. We introduce MT-OSC, a One-off Sequential Condensation framework that efficiently and automatically condenses chat history in the background without disrupting the user experience. MT-OSC employs a Condenser Agent that uses a few-shot inference-based Condenser and a lightweight Decider to selectively retain essential information, reducing token counts by up to 72% in 10-turn dialogues. Evaluated across 13 state-of-the-art LLMs and diverse multi-turn benchmarks, MT-OSC consistently narrows the multi-turn performance gap—yielding improved or preserved accuracy across datasets while remaining robust to distractors and irrelevant turns. Our results establish MT-OSC as a scalable solution for multi-turn chats, enabling richer context within constrained input spaces, reducing latency and operational cost, while balancing performance.

Abstract:
Research in cross-lingual modeling for historical and extremely low-resource languages is hindered by the absence of standardized evaluation benchmarks. To address this, we present ManCC—the first task-anchored benchmark for Manchu–Classical Chinese translation. ManCC consists of a high-quality parallel corpus of 16,627 sentence pairs, derived from the Qing-dynasty historical text Manwen Laodang-Taizong, and a reproducible evaluation protocol that combines automatic metrics (BLEU and chrF) with a three-dimensional human assessment (fidelity, fluency, linguistic normativity). Through systematic evaluation across three model families (non-pretrained, multilingual pretrained, and large language models), we find that linguistic differences significantly influence performance, broader language coverage in multilingual pretraining facilitates low-resource transfer, and automatic metrics often fail to capture essential errors in historical translation—underscoring the necessity of human evaluation. ManCC not only provides foundational resources for Manchu–Classical Chinese translation but also establishes a diagnosable, reproducible platform for cross-lingual modeling of historical low-resource languages.

Abstract:
With the growing adoption of VLMs, DMs, LLMs, and AFMs, these multimodal foundation models can inadvertently encode sensitive, copyrighted, biased, or unsafe cross-modal associations that originate from their training data. Retraining after deletion requests or policy updates is often impractical, and targeted forgetting remains difficult because knowledge is distributed across shared representations. Multimodal unlearning addresses this challenge by enabling selective removal across modalities while retaining overall utility. This survey offers a unified, system-oriented view of multimodal unlearning across vision, language, audio, and video, grounded in recent advances, emerging applications, and open problems. Our taxonomy enables systematic comparison across model architectures and modalities, clarifying trade-offs among deletion strength, retention, efficiency, reversibility, and robustness. This survey highlights open problems and practical considerations to support future research and deployment of multimodal unlearning.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances code generation by incorporating retrieved code examples into prompts, but the resulting long-context inputs impose substantial memory and computational overhead. Existing prompt compression techniques are largely designed for natural language and fail to account for the structural and semantic properties of code, while also lacking fine-grained control over compression ratios. We propose CodePromptZip, a code-aware prompt compression framework for RAG that enables precise length control while preserving critical information. Motivated by type-aware ablation studies, CodePromptZip leverages static analysis to rank code tokens by information gain and applies a dynamic compression strategy to retain the most informative tokens under a given budget. For incomplete or unparsable code snippets, CodePromptZip employs a language-model-based compressor trained on analyzable samples and augmented with a copy mechanism to preserve key tokens. Extensive experiments on three code-related tasks demonstrate that CodePromptZip consistently outperforms entropy-based and distillation-based baselines, achieving improvements of 23.4%, 28.7%, and 8.7%, respectively, while providing accurate control over compression ratios.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly acting as autonomous agents, but their continuous interaction with the environment can lead to in-context reward hacking (ICRH), a phenomenon in which LLMs iteratively optimize their behavior to maximize proxy objectives, inadvertently producing harmful side effects. Existing defense methods are insufficient to address this risk, as ICRH arises not from adversarial inputs but from the model’s own over-optimization. To mitigate this issue, we propose LLM-based Constraint Optimization (LCO), a framework that effectively reduces ICRH without model fine-tuning. LCO consists of two modules: self-thought module, which guides the LLM to proactively deliberate and integrate potential safety constraints before execution; and guided evolutionary exploration module, which employs LLM-based crossover and mutation to constrain the model’s actions within a safe solution space while maintaining task performance. Experimental results demonstrate that LCO substantially alleviates ICRH in both output-refine and policy-refine scenarios. In particular, on the tweet engagement optimization task, LCO achieves a 39% reduction in the Toxicity Growth Rate (TGR) on GPT-4, while on the policy optimization benchmark, it reduces the ICRH Occurrence Rate by 15.23%, demonstrating safety improvement without sacrificing task performance.Our code is available at: https://github.com/Califoni/LCO_for_ICRH.

Abstract:
Agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems enable large language models (LLMs) to solve complex tasks through multi-step interaction with external retrieval tools. However, such multi-step interaction often involves redundant search steps, incurring substantial computational cost and latency. Prior work limits search depth (i.e., the number of search steps) to reduce cost, but this often leads to underexploration of complex questions. To address this, we first investigate how search depth affects accuracy and find a minimal sufficient search depth that defines an accuracy-efficiency trade-off, jointly determined by question complexity and the agent’s capability. Furthermore, we propose AutoSearch, a reinforcement learning framework that evaluates each search step via self-generated intermediate answers. By a self-answering mechanism, AutoSearch identifies the minimal sufficient search depth and promotes efficient search by rewarding its attainment while penalizing over-searching. In addition, reward mechanisms are introduced to stabilize search behavior and improve answer quality on complex questions. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that AutoSearch achieves a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off, alleviating over-searching while preserving search quality.

Abstract:
The combination of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has shown significant potential for enhancing the multi-task learning capabilities of Large Language Models. However, existing methods face two primary challenges: (1)Imprecise Routing in the current MoE-LoRA method fails to explicitly match input semantics with expert capabilities, leading to weak expert specialization. (2)Uniform weight fusion strategies struggle to provide adaptive update strengths, overlooking the varying complexity of different tasks. To address these limitations, we propose SAMoRA ( S emantic- A ware M ixture o f Lo RA Experts), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework tailored for task-adaptive learning. Specifically, A Semantic-Aware Router is proposed to explicitly align textual semantics with the most suitable experts for precise routing. A Task-Adaptive Scaling mechanism is designed to regulate expert contributions based on specific task requirements dynamically. In addition, a novel regularization objective is proposed to jointly promote expert specialization and effective scaling. Extensive experiments on multiple multi-task benchmarks demonstrate that SAMoRA significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods and holds excellent task generalization capabilities. Code is available at https://github.com/boyan-code/SAMoRA

Abstract:
Synthesizing high-quality mathematical reasoning data without human priors remains a significant challenge. Current approaches typically rely on seed data mutation or simple prompt engineering, often suffering from mode collapse and limited logical complexity. This paper proposes a hierarchical synthesis framework that formulates data synthesis as an unsupervised optimization problem over a constraint graph followed by semantic instantiation, rather than treating it as a direct text generation task. We introduce a Legislator-Executor paradigm: The Legislator adversarially evolves structured generation blueprints encoding the constraints of the problem, while the Executor instantiates these specifications into diverse natural language scenarios. This decoupling of skeleton design from linguistic realization enables a prioritized focus on constructing complex and diverse logical structures, thereby guiding high-quality data synthesis. Experiments conducted on a total of 10 models across the Qwen, Llama, Mistral, and Gemma series demonstrate that our method achieves notable results: models fine-tuned on 1K synthesized samples outperform widely-used datasets of comparable scale (LIMO, s1K) across eight mathematical benchmarks, exhibiting superior out-of-distribution generalization.

Abstract:
Small Language Models (SLMs) provide computational advantages in resource-constrained environments, yet memory limitations remain a critical bottleneck for edge device deployment. A substantial portion of SLMs’ memory footprint stems from vocabulary-related components, particularly embeddings and language modeling (LM) heads, due to large vocabulary sizes. Existing static vocabulary pruning, while reducing memory usage, suffers from rigid, one-size-fits-all designs that cause information loss during the prefill stage and lack flexibility. In this work, we identify two key principles underlying the vocabulary reduction challenge: the lexical locality principle, the observation that only a small subset of tokens is required during any single inference, and the asymmetry in computational characteristics between vocabulary-related components of SLM. Based on these insights, we introduce VocabTailor, a novel decoupled dynamic vocabulary selection framework that addresses memory constraints through offloading embedding and implements a hybrid static-dynamic vocabulary selection strategy for LM Head, enabling on-demand loading of vocabulary components. Comprehensive experiments across diverse downstream tasks demonstrate that VocabTailor achieves a reduction of up to 99% in the memory usage of vocabulary-related components with minimal or no degradation in task performance, substantially outperforming existing static vocabulary pruning. Our code is available at https://github.com/AwakenedInsects/VocabTailor.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in multi-disciplinary team (MDT) medical consultations. However, long, multi-round, multi-role interaction trajectories inevitably lead to severe information dilution and context window overload, triggering context collapse which destabilizes reasoning. Furthermore, prior systems typically rely on unstructured trajectory history storage without structurally distilling key information or reflecting on errors, severely limiting continuous learning capabilities. We propose MDTeamGPT, a context-resilient and self-evolving multi-agent framework. Mechanistically, we introduce a specialized Lead Physician mechanism combined with a Residual Context architecture to compress and reorganize multi-round consensus, effectively mitigating context overload and reducing computational costs. For memory, we design a Dual Knowledge Base system comprising a CorrectKB for verified trajectories and a ChainKB for reflective error analysis, enabling self-evolution via retrieval from both successes and failures. We evaluated our framework on standard text datasets (MedQA, PubMedQA), multimodal benchmarks (VQA-RAD, SLAKE), and collected more complex clinical problems. Experimental results show that MDTeamGPT substantially outperforms existing baselines across both text-based and multimodal tasks, while also demonstrating superior diagnostic performance and stability in complex clinical scenarios.

Abstract:
We present a system that uses LLMs as a tool in the development of Constructed Languages— ConLangs, which we call IASC (Interactive Agentic System for ConLangs). The system is modular in that it creates each of the components—phonology, morphology and syntax, lexicon, orthography, and grammatical handbook, using module-specific sets of prompts. The approach is agentic in that various modules allow for refining the output given automatically-generated commentary on a previous step. Our main goals are twofold. First, we aim to provide tools that facilitate an engaging and enjoyable experience in creating artificially constructed languages. Second, the focus of this paper is on using our ConLang framework as a novel way to explore what LLMs ‘know’ about language—not what they know about any particular language or encyclopedic facts, but how much they know about and understand language and linguistic concepts. In the experiments, we particularly focus on the morphosyntax module and show that there is a fairly wide gulf in capabilities both among different LLMs and among different linguistic specifications, with it being notably easier for systems to deal with more typologically common patterns than rarer ones. All code is released: https://github.com/SakanaAI/IASC.

Abstract:
Current evaluations of large language models (LLMs) mainly rely on dataset-based generation accuracy. However, generative correctness does not guarantee the discriminative capability required to verify solutions, frequently masking an inability to distinguish valid reasoning from plausible errors. While multi-agent debate inherently entails judgment, we show that uncontrolled context growth and convergence to majority voting introduce significant noise, obscuring intrinsic model judgment. To address these limitations, we propose a progressive argumentation-mining diagnostic framework designed to explicitly control context and isolate discriminative behaviors. Instead of indiscriminate aggregation, our approach distills and retains only the single most well-supported rationale per answer, preventing context dilution while enforcing strict quality-based selection. Applying this framework reveals a fundamental cognitive divergence: models exhibit structural susceptibility to plausible misinformation in knowledge tasks, whereas in reasoning tasks they demonstrate latent discriminative potential that remains fragile under pressure. These findings underscore the fragility of discriminative capabilities, advocating for diagnostic methodologies that prioritize judgment stability over simple generation performance.

Abstract:
While LLMs increasingly assist individual users, there is a critical need for agents that can proactively manage complex, multi-party collaboration. However, the scarcity of systematic evaluation methods for these group dynamics limits the development of AI capable of effectively supporting teams Here, we present ProMediate, the first testbed for evaluating proactive AI mediator agents in complex, multi-topic, multi-party negotiations. ProMediate consists of two core components: (i) a simulation environment based on realistic negotiation cases with a plug-and-play proactive AI mediator, capable of flexibly deciding when and how to intervene; and (ii) a socio-cognitive evaluation framework with a new suite of metrics to measure consensus changes, intervention latency, mediator effectiveness, and intelligence. These components establish a systematic framework for assessing the capability of proactive AI agents in multi-party settings. Our results show that a socially intelligent mediator agent outperforms a generic baseline, via faster, better-targeted interventions. In the ProMediate-Hard setting, our social mediator increases consensus change by 3.6 percentage points compared to the generic baseline (10.65% vs 7.01%) while being 77% faster in response (15.98s vs. 3.71s). In conclusion, ProMediate provides a rigorous, theory-grounded testbed to advance the development of proactive, socially intelligent agents.

Abstract:
Ensuring the accuracy of financial documents is critical for economic analysis, regulatory compliance, and corporate decision-making. Several studies have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) perform well in many financial tasks, such as stock price movements and financial analytics. However, a critical task remains unexplored: the ability of LLMs to identify errors in financial documents. In this paper, we introduce FinED-Bench, the first publicly Benchmark for Financial Error Detection across three levels of cognitive complexity. FinED-Bench covers nine real-world financial scenarios, and includes over 900 documents reported in 2025 that are unseen by existing language models. We detail the benchmark construction process and evaluate several advanced LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o, Qwen3-14B) on this tasks, which requires both financial domain knowledge and reasoning capabilities. Experimental results show that current LLMs still struggle with this task, especially in high-complexity cases. Besides, supervised fine-tuning can significantly improve the performance of weaker LLMs on this task. Our data and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FinED-Bench-406F.

Abstract:
Conventional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems often struggle with complex multi-hop queries over long documents due to their single-pass retrieval. We introduce MM-Doc-R1, a novel framework that employs an agentic, vision-aware workflow to address long document visual question answering through iterative information discovery and synthesis. To incentivize the information seeking capabilities of our agents, we propose Similarity-based Policy Optimization (SPO), addressing baseline estimation bias in existing multi-turn reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms like GRPO. Our core insight is that in multi-turn RL, the more semantically similar two trajectories are, the more accurate their shared baseline estimation becomes. Leveraging this, SPO calculates a more precise baseline by similarity-weighted averaging of rewards across multiple trajectories, unlike GRPO which inappropriately applies the initial state’s baseline to all intermediate states. This provides a more stable and accurate learning signal for our agents, leading to superior training performance that surpasses GRPO. Our experiments on the MMLongbench-Doc benchmark show that MM-Doc-R1 outperforms previous baselines by 10.4%. Furthermore, SPO demonstrates superior performance over GRPO, boosting results by 5.0% with Qwen3-8B and 6.1% with Qwen3-4B. These results highlight the effectiveness of our integrated framework and novel training algorithm in advancing the state-of-the-art for complex, long-document visual question answering.

Abstract:
Complex flight tasks demand both intricate, long-horizon decision-making and precise operations, which imposes immense cognitive, knowledge and experience demands for pilots and highlights the need for advanced copilot systems. While Large Language Models (LLMs) bring powerful potential to this area, a comprehensive LLM-based copilot system—one that addresses deficiencies in task-level adaptability and fine-grained decision support while integrating with a high-fidelity environment—is critically lacking. To address this gap, we present FalconCopilot, pioneering the first such comprehensive system, composed of two parts: 1) Textual DCS, an interface built upon Digital Combat Simulator (DCS) World that unifies multi-modal cockpit data and piloting knowledge into a stable semantic interface for LLMs. Building on this interface, we introduce 2) FalconAgent, an LLM-powered copilot agent that performs optimized task planning, incorporating capabilities for multi-crew task allocation and procedural pruning. Our built-in human-AI interaction is grounded by a bidirectional feedback loop of runtime verification and human correction. In human-in-the-loop experiment, FalconCopilot shortens task completion time while attaining a level of performance approaching that of a human instructor.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates non-parametric knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs), typically from unstructured texts and structured graphs. While recent progress has advanced text-based RAG to multi-turn reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (RL), extending these advances to hybrid retrieval introduces additional challenges. Existing graph-based or hybrid systems typically depend on fixed or handcrafted retrieval pipelines, lacking the ability to integrate supplementary evidence as reasoning unfolds. Besides, while graph evidence provides relational structures crucial for multi-hop reasoning, it is substantially more expensive to retrieve. To address these limitations, we introduce RouteRAG, an RL-based framework that enables LLMs to perform multi-turn and adaptive graph-text hybrid RAG. RouteRAG jointly optimizes the entire generation process via RL, allowing the model to learn when to reason, what to retrieve from either texts or graphs, and when to produce final answers, all within a unified generation policy. To guide this learning process, we design a two-stage training framework that accounts for both task outcome and retrieval efficiency, enabling the model to exploit hybrid evidence while avoiding unnecessary retrieval overhead. Experimental results across five question answering benchmarks demonstrate that RouteRAG significantly outperforms existing RAG baselines, highlighting the benefits of end-to-end RL in supporting adaptive and efficient retrieval for complex reasoning.

Abstract:
Longitudinal chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation requires reasoning over disease evolution across multiple patient visits, yet most existing medical VQA benchmarks focus on single images or short-horizon image pairs. We introduce MI-CXR, a benchmark for standardized evaluation of Multi-Interval longitudinal reasoning over multi-visit CXR sequences, without requiring free-form report generation or additional clinical context. MI-CXR comprises five-way multiple-choice questions over five-visit patient timelines and instantiates three complementary task families: Temporal Event Localization, Interval-wise Change Reasoning, and Global Trajectory Summarization, which assess clinically grounded visual reasoning over time. Evaluating 14 state-of-the-art vision–language models (VLMs) shows low overall performance (29.3% accuracy), only modestly above random guessing. Using stage-wise diagnostic probing, we find that models often produce locally plausible interval descriptions but fail to enforce temporal constraints or compose evidence into globally consistent decisions over the full timeline. These findings reveal key limitations of current VLMs and establish MI-CXR as a principled benchmark for longitudinal medical reasoning. The benchmark is available at: https://github.com/AIDASLab/MI-CXR

Abstract:
With the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs), understanding their personality representation mechanisms has become critical. As a novel paradigm in Personality Editing, most existing methods employ neuron-editing to locate and modify LLM neurons, requiring changes to numerous neurons and leading to significant performance degradation. This raises a fundamental question: Are all modified neurons directly related to personality representation? In this work, we investigate and quantify this specificity through assessments of general capability impact and representation-level patterns. We find that: 1) Current methods can change personalities but reduce overall performance. 2) Neurons are multifunctional, connecting personality traits and general knowledge. 3) Opposing personality traits demonstrate distinctly mutually exclusive representation patterns. Motivated by these findings, we propose DPN-LE (Dual Personality Neuron Localization and Editing), which identifies personality-specific neurons by contrasting MLP activations between high-trait and low-trait samples. DPN-LE constructs layer-wise steering vectors and applies dual-criterion filtering based on Cohen’s d effect size and activation magnitude to isolate mutually exclusive neuron subsets. Sparse linear intervention on these neurons enables precise personality control at inference time. Using only 1,000 contrastive sample pairs per trait, DPN-LE intervenes on ∼ 0.5% of neurons while achieving competitive personality control and substantially better capability preservation across reasoning tasks. Experiments on LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of our approach.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in math and logic reasoning, their ability to handle combinatorial optimization (CO)—searching high-dimensional solution spaces under hard constraints—remains underexplored. To bridge the gap, we introduce NLCO, a Natural Language Combinatorial Optimization benchmark that evaluates LLMs on end-to-end CO reasoning: given a language-described decision-making scenario, the model must output a discrete solution without writing code or calling external solvers. NLCO covers 43 CO problems and is organized using a four-layer taxonomy of variable types, constraint families, global patterns, and objective classes, enabling fine-grained evaluation. We provide solver-annotated solutions and comprehensively evaluate LLMs by feasibility, solution optimality, and reasoning efficiency. Experiments across a wide range of modern LLMs show that high-performing models achieve strong feasibility and solution quality on small instances, but both degrade as instance size grows, even if more tokens are used for reasoning. We also observe systematic effects across the taxonomy: set-based tasks are relatively easy, whereas graph-structured problems and bottleneck objectives lead to more frequent failures. The benchmark dataset and code for data generation and evaluation are publicly available.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance across diverse tasks, but they often generate responses that appear plausible while being factually incorrect. This problem is compounded by the lack of explicit uncertainty estimates, which makes it difficult for users to judge the reliability of model outputs. Existing uncertainty quantification methods typically rely on indirect signals, such as entropy across sampled generations. These signals can be difficult to interpret and do not fully leverage the model’s ability to assess its own uncertainty. We propose a simple and effective self-assessment method for uncertainty quantification in LLMs. Our approach groups sampled generations into semantically distinct clusters, converts them into answer options in a structured multiple-choice question, and uses the probability assigned by the LLM to each option as a confidence estimate. Experiments across multiple models and datasets show that our method consistently outperforms baseline approaches. Notably, it achieves competitive performance with as few as two additional samples, demonstrating both its effectiveness and efficiency.

Abstract:
Designing and optimizing multi-agent systems (MAS) is a complex, labor-intensive process of "Agent Engineering." Existing automatic optimization methods, primarily focused on flat prompt tuning, lack the structural awareness to debug the intricate web of interactions in MAS. More critically, these optimizers are static; they do not learn from experience to improve their own optimization strategies. To address these gaps, we introduce Textual Parameter Graph Optimization (TPGO), a framework that enables a multi-agent system to learn to evolve. TPGO first models the MAS as a Textual Parameter Graph (TPG), where agents, tools, and workflows are modular, optimizable nodes. To guide evolution, we derive "textual gradients," structured natural language feedback from execution traces, to pinpoint failures and suggest granular modifications. The core of our framework is Group Relative Agent Optimization (GRAO), a novel meta-learning strategy that learns from historical optimization experiences. By analyzing past successes and failures, GRAO becomes progressively better at proposing effective updates, allowing the system to learn how to optimize itself. Extensive experiments on complex benchmarks like GAIA and MCP-Universe show that TPGO significantly enhances the performance of state-of-the-art agent frameworks, achieving higher success rates through automated, self-improving optimization.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on accumulated memory to solve long-horizon decision-making tasks. However, most existing approaches store memory in fixed representations and reuse it at a single or implicit level of abstraction, which limits generalization and often leads to negative transfer when distribution shift. This paper proposes the Meta-Cognitive Memory Abstraction method (MCMA), which treats memory abstraction as a learnable cognitive skill rather than a fixed design choice. MCMA decouples task execution from memory management by combining a frozen task model with a learned memory copilot. The memory copilot is trained using direct preference optimization; it determines how experience should be structured, abstracted, and reused. Memories are further organized into a hierarchy of abstraction levels, enabling selective reuse based on task similarity. When no memory is transferable, MCMA transfers the ability to abstract and manage memory by transferring the memory copilot. Experiments on ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, and BabyAI demonstrate substantial improvements in performance, out-of-distribution generalization, and cross-task transfer over several baselines.

Abstract:
Human moral judgment is context-dependent and changes based on interpersonal relationships. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as decision-support systems, it is critical to understand if they encode these social nuances. We characterize LLM behavior using the Whistleblower’s Dilemma, systematically varying two experimental factors: crime severity and relational closeness. Our study compares three evaluative perspectives: (1) moral rightness (general prescriptive norms), (2) predictive human behavior (how models expect people to navigate social situations), and (3) models’ own decision-making. By analyzing the reasoning processes, we find a clear cross-perspective divergence: moral rightness remains consistently fairness-oriented, while predicted human behavior shifts with relational context toward loyalty. Crucially, the model decisions mirror moral rightness judgments, rather than their behavioral predictions. This cross-perspective inconsistency suggests that LLM decision-making favors abstract rules over the social sensitivity found in their internal modeling, potentially producing conflicting expectations in real-world deployments.

Abstract:
Indirect speech acts (ISAs) require pragmatic reasoning over context, as directive intent cannot be inferred from surface form alone. Prior text-based studies and existing multimodal benchmarks largely overlook this requirement, focusing instead on explicitly encoded context or perceptual recognition, and thus underexplore context-dependent pragmatic understanding—particularly in high-context languages such as Korean. We introduce READI, a multimodal benchmark for evaluating ISA understanding through integrated reasoning over visual context and dialogue. READI models graded indirectness grounded in pragmatic theory and formulates the task as vision-based pragmatic question answering (V-PQA), supporting cross-lingual evaluation in English and Korean. Experiments show that even state-of-the-art multimodal models struggle with visually grounded indirect speech acts, with performance declining as indirectness increases, underscoring the need for benchmarks that explicitly target contextual pragmatic reasoning.

Abstract:
Scaling data and model size has been proven effective for boosting the performance of large language models. In addition to training-time scaling, recent studies have revealed that increasing test-time computational resources can further improve performance. In this work, we introduce Aggregation Fine-Tuning (AFT), a supervised fine-tuning paradigm where the model learns to synthesize multiple draft responses, referred to as proposals, into a single, refined answer, termed aggregation. At inference time, we apply a propose-and-aggregate strategy that iteratively generates and aggregates proposals, effectively scaling inference-time computation without relying on external guidance such as a reward model. Empirical results across benchmark datasets demonstrate that AFT-trained models achieve substantial gains with test-time scaling, outperforming best-of-N baselines while eliminating the need for external reward signals. Notably, an AFT model, fine-tuned from Llama3.1-8B-Base with only 64k data, achieves a 41.3% LC win rate on AlpacaEval 2, surpassing significantly larger LLMs such as Llama3.1-405B-Instruct and GPT-4. By combining sequential refinement and parallel sampling, the propose-and-aggregate framework scales inference-time computation in a flexible manner.

Abstract:
Social bots threaten online platforms by mimicking human behavior and forming deceptive connections, enabling the dissemination of misinformation while evading detection. Existing graph-based detection models leverage graph neural networks (GNNs) to capture relational structures and multimodal user features. However, such models are vulnerable to deceptive message propagation, where bots deliberately interact with legitimate users. These interactions create heterophilous edges–connections between nodes with different labels (i.e. human and bot)–which undermine the homophily assumption that connected users typically share similar characteristics. In this work, we propose a novel framework to mitigate deceptive message propagation through node-level uncertainty estimation and graph structure purification. The framework comprises three key components: (1) Node uncertainty estimation employs evidential deep learning with an error-sensitive uncertainty loss to obtain calibrated node-wise uncertainty; (2) Uncertainty-guided pseudo-label generation assigns pseudo-labels to low-uncertainty nodes using a dynamic threshold; (3) Graph structure purification selectively disconnects heterophilous edges identified between differently labeled nodes. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets and six GNN backbones demonstrate that our framework consistently enhances detection performance and serves as an effective general-purpose enhancement module for social bot detection.

Abstract:
Virtual cell modeling predicts molecular state changes under genetic perturbations in silico, which is essential for biological mechanism studies. However, existing approaches suffer from unconstrained reasoning, uninterpretable predictions, and retrieval signals that are weakly aligned with regulatory topology. To address these limitations, we propose AROMA, an Augmented Reasoning Over a Multimodal Architecture for virtual cell genetic perturbation modeling. AROMA integrates textual evidence, graph-topology information, and protein sequence features to model perturbation-target dependencies, and is trained with a two-stage optimization strategy to yield predictions that are both accurate and interpretable. We also construct two knowledge graphs and a perturbation reasoning dataset, PerturbReason, containing more than 498k samples, as reusable resources for the virtual cell domain. Experiments show that AROMA outperforms existing methods across multiple cell lines, and remains robust under zero-shot evaluation on an unseen cell line, as well as in knowledge-sparse, long-tail scenarios. Overall, AROMA demonstrates that combining knowledge-driven multimodal modeling with evidence retrieval provides a promising pathway toward more reliable and interpretable virtual cell perturbation prediction. Model weights are available at https://huggingface.co/blazerye/AROMA. Code is available at https://github.com/blazerye/AROMA.

Abstract:
Vectorization via Single Instruction, Multiple Data (SIMD) architectures is a cornerstone of high-performance computing. To fully exploit hardware potential, developers often resort to explicit vectorization using intrinsics, as compiler-based auto-vectorization frequently yields suboptimal results due to conservative static analysis. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in general code generation, they struggle with explicit vectorization due to the scarcity of high-quality corpora and the strict semantic constraints of low-level hardware instructions. In this paper, we propose AutoVecCoder, a novel framework designed to empower LLMs with the capability of automated explicit vectorization. AutoVecCoder integrates two core components: VecPrompt, an automated data synthesis pipeline to inject domain-specific intrinsic knowledge; and VecRL, a reinforcement learning framework that aligns code generation with execution efficiency. AutoVecCoder-8B trained by this framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the SSE and AVX subsets of SimdBench and, in some cases, generates implementations surpassing standard -O3 optimizations, effectively overcoming the inherent bottlenecks of traditional automated vectorization.

Abstract:
The popular path query - identifying the most frequented routes between locations from historical trajectory data - has important applications in urban planning, navigation optimization, and travel recommendations. While traditional algorithms and machine learning approaches have achieved success in this domain, they typically require model training, parameter tuning, and retraining when accommodating data updates. As Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate increasing capabilities in spatial and graph-based reasoning, there is growing interest in exploring how these models can be applied to geo-spatial problems.We introduce CompassLLM, a novel multi-agent framework that intelligently leverages the reasoning capabilities of LLMs into the geo-spatial domain to solve the popular path query. CompassLLM employs its agents in a two-stage pipeline: the SEARCH stage that identifies popular paths, and a GENERATE stage that synthesizes novel paths in the absence of an existing one in the historical trajectory data. Experiments on real and synthetic datasets show that CompassLLM demonstrates superior accuracy in SEARCH and competitive performance in GENERATE while being cost-effective.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, these models still struggle with formal logical reasoning, often producing coherent yet invalid conclusions due to limitations in representing boundaries and relational structures through text alone. Human cognition frequently relies on visual representations to clarify logical structures involving category membership, inclusion, and relational hierarchies. Inspired by this, we investigate whether incorporating visual logic diagrams into LLMs’ reasoning workflows can enhance their performance on formal logic tasks. We study this question in a controlled setting using syllogistic and conditional reasoning with programmatically generated Venn, Euler, and Linear diagrams. Across three Vision Language Models (VLMs) families, diagrams help in some settings but can also hurt performance, especially on logically invalid cases where models may over-rely on a single static visual instantiation. We therefore present this work as a reproducible evaluation framework and empirical analysis of when logic diagrams help or hinder language-conditioned reasoning.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) experience significant performance degradation when the input exceeds the pretraining context window, primarily due to the out-of-distribution (OOD) behavior of Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE). Recent studies mitigate this problem by remapping OOD positions into the in-distribution range with fixed mapping strategies, ignoring the dynamic relationship between input length and the model’s effective context window. To this end, we propose Length-aware Multi-grained Positional Encoding (LaMPE), a training-free method that fully utilizes the model’s effective context window for adaptive long-context scaling in LLMs. Motivated by the left-skewed frequency distribution of relative positions, LaMPE establishes a dynamic relationship between mapping length and input length through a parametric scaled sigmoid function to adaptively allocate positional capacity across varying input lengths. Meanwhile, LaMPE devises a novel multi-grained attention mechanism that strategically allocates positional resolution across different sequence regions to capture both fine-grained locality and long-range dependencies. Our method can be seamlessly applied to a wide range of RoPE-based LLMs without training. Extensive experiments on three representative LLMs across five mainstream long-context benchmarks demonstrate that LaMPE achieves significant performance improvements compared to existing length extrapolation methods.

Abstract:
Unsupervised domain adaptation generalizes neural retrievers to an unseen domain by generating pseudo queries on target domain documents. The quality and efficiency of this adaptation critically depend on which documents are selected for pseudo query generation. The existing document sampling method focuses on diversity but fails to capture model uncertainty. In contrast, we propose Uncertainty-based Iterative Document Sampling (UnIte), addressing these limitations by (1) filtering documents with high aleatoric uncertainty and (2) prioritizing those with high epistemic uncertainty, maximizing the learning utility of the current model. We conducted extensive experiments on a large corpus of BEIR with small and large models, showing significant gains of +2.45 and +3.49 nDCG@10 with a smaller training sample size, 4k on average.

Abstract:
Memory systems often organize user-agent interactions as retrievable external memory and are crucial for long-running agents by overcoming the limited context windows of LLMs. However, existing memory systems invoke LLMs to process every incoming interaction for memory extraction, and such an eager memory consolidation scheme leads to substantial token consumption. To tackle this problem, we propose RecMem by rethinking when memory consolidation should be conducted. RecMem stores incoming interactions in a subconscious memory layer and encode them using lightweight embedding models for retrieval. LLMs are only invoked to extract episodic and semantic memory when sustained recurrence are observed for semantically similar interactions. Such recurrence-based consolidation works because these interactions correspond to a semantic cluster with rich information and thus are worth extraction and summarization. To improve accuracy, RecMem also incorporates a semantic refinement mechanism that recovers the fine-grained facts omitted by memory extraction. Experiments show that RecMem reduces the memory construction token cost of three SOTA memory systems by up to 87% while exceeding their accuracy.

Abstract:
In-context learning (ICL) is the standard method for low-resource classification, yet its efficacy in specialized domains remains largely unexplored. We address the challenge of classifying semantically complex, multi-party B2B conversations, where traditional ICL encounters significant limitations, especially as context length increases due to the concatenation of multiple few-shot examples. We introduce the Call Playbook dataset, featuring five classification tasks derived from real-world B2B conversations targeting core sales concepts. To bridge the gap between performance and practical utility, we propose novel knowledge extraction methods that distill verbose examples into compact, interpretable representations of structured classification criteria and precise task descriptions. Our approach achieves a 99% reduction in token usage and improves macro-averaged AUC by up to 7% over traditional ICL. Notably, it remains robust as context grows, unlike advanced token compression baselines which degrade by over 9 F1 points. Importantly, our framework enables direct refinement of classification logic, addressing critical needs for transparency, efficiency, and user interaction in real-world NLP applications.

Abstract:
Scientific information extraction (SciIE) is a key bottleneck for turning unstructured papers into computable knowledge bases, yet most existing systems still follow a “local extraction then global assembly” paradigm. This workflow is inherently lossy: by extracting fields in isolation, it breaks global correlations and discards high-confidence signals that could otherwise be reused as internal supervision, forcing systems to repeatedly restart from scratch, especially in long, multimodal scientific documents. In this paper, We propose a different view: SciIE should be solved as a progressive filling problem, similar to solving a Sudoku,once a field is filled with high confidence, it should act as a constraint that guides the remaining uncertain fields. Based on this idea, we introduce SudokuFill, a multi-agent framework that maintains a Global Filling State and performs priority scheduling to establish reliable anchors first, then reuses them as internal supervision for iterative deliberation over harder fields. Evaluated on a specialized document-level adjuvant dataset, our framework achieves a SOTA score of 51.83% on our benchmark. Crucially, SudokuFill enables a 7B model to outperform the vanilla GPT-4o, proving that structured architectural reasoning can effectively compensate for parameter scale.

Abstract:
Current LLM-based multi-agent systems remain fragile under scaling, even on algorithmically trivial tasks. We introduce MAS-BENCH, a distributed-sorting benchmark that isolates coordination under explicit communication constraints: each agent observes only a local segment and must collectively produce a globally consistent order via broadcasting, peer-to-peer messaging, or a shared key-value store. Across LLM-based agents, success drops sharply as the number of agents grows, exposing persistent failures in shared state, convention alignment, and consistent termination. To mitigate these breakdowns, we propose CAMOC, a lightweight, drop-in proof-of-concept built on collaboration-aware information sharing, early global metadata exchange, and single-commit verification. CAMOC substantially improves coordination success and efficiency across backends, with the largest gains under shared-state interaction. Overall, MAS-BENCH provides a diagnostic benchmark and CAMOC offers a practical step toward more reliable large-scale LLM collaboration, highlighting a gap between individual reasoning and collective correctness.

Abstract:
Human trafficking exploits vulnerable individuals through forced sex or labor. Illicit massage businesses offer a clandestine front to illicit activities by disguising themselves as legitimate businesses. This makes it challenging for law enforcement agencies and anti-trafficking organizations to detect these enterprises and their associated entities, disrupt the network, and save victims. We adopt a multi-stream data integration approach primarily focusing on consumer-generated business reviews on Yelp.com, enriched with features from contextual data sources, such as the U.S. Census and business license records. We propose a novel decision support framework that extends the traditional link prediction methods by defining a higher-order neighborhood to detect links between pairs of massage businesses and the exposure of businesses to illicit activities related to human trafficking. We achieve this by introducing a bespoke subgraph extraction strategy in GNNs where the node features are derived using NLP techniques. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate the competitive performance of our approach over the baseline methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Models are being increasingly deployed as the decision-making core of autonomous agents capable of effecting change in external environments. Yet, in conversational benchmarks, which simulate real-world customer-centric issue resolution scenarios, these agents frequently fail due to the cascading effects of incorrect decision-making. These challenges are particularly pronounced for open-source LLMs with smaller parameter sizes, limited context windows, and constrained inference budgets, which contribute to increased error accumulation in agentic settings. To tackle these challenges, we present the Failure-Aware Meta-Agentic (FAMA) framework. FAMA operates in two stages: first, it analyzes failure trajectories from baseline agents to identify the most prevalent errors; second, it employs an orchestration mechanism that activates a minimal subset of specialized agents tailored to address these failures by injecting a targeted context for the tool-use agent before the decision-making step. Experiments across open-source LLMs demonstrate performance gains up to 27% across evaluation modes over standard baselines. These results highlight that targeted curation of context through specialized agents to address common failures is a valuable design principle for building reliable, multi-turn tool-use LLM agents that simulate real-world conversational scenarios.

Abstract:
Despite recent advances in safety alignment, large language models (LLMs) remain highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, while the internal mechanisms behind such vulnerabilities are still poorly understood. Existing gradient-based attribution methods offer valuable interpretability for analyzing information storage and processing in LLMs. However, they are inapplicable to adversarial attacks, which typically occur in open-ended generation settings without fixed ground-truth outputs. To address these challenges, we propose a novel similarity-based gradient attribution method to identify key neurons sensitive to adversarial behaviors in open-ended generation tasks. The detected neurons, termed targeted neurons, play a critical role in safety training. Building on this neuron-level perspective, we uncover two key neuronal patterns: (i) universal neurons that are consistently exploited across multiple attack strategies, and (ii) interference neurons that hinder safety improvements when fine-tuned indiscriminately, providing mechanistic insights into the interpretability of adversarial vulnerabilities. Inspired by these findings, we propose a neuron-level defense strategy, Targeted Neuron Tuning (TNT), which selectively fine-tunes the identified targeted neurons for specific attacks. Experimental evaluations across multiple LLM architectures and scales demonstrate that TNT substantially improves model robustness against a wide range of jailbreak attacks, achieving safe rates exceeding 90% and even approaching 100%, while preserving general task performance, enabling precise and robust safety interventions. Warning: This paper contains example data that may be harmful.

Abstract:
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are increasingly deployed in safety-critical robotic applications, yet their security vulnerabilities remain underexplored. We identify a fundamental security flaw in modern VLA systems: the combination of action chunking and delta pose representations creates an intra-chunk visual open-loop. This mechanism forces the robot to execute K -step action sequences, allowing per-step perturbations to accumulate through integration. We propose SilentDrift, a stealthy black-box backdoor attack exploiting this vulnerability. Our method employs the Smootherstep function to construct perturbations with guaranteed C 2 continuity, ensuring zero velocity and acceleration at trajectory boundaries to satisfy strict kinematic consistency constraints. Furthermore, our keyframe attack strategy selectively poisons only the critical approach phase, maximizing impact while minimizing trigger exposure. The resulting poisoned trajectories are visually indistinguishable from successful demonstrations. Evaluated on the LIBERO, SilentDrift achieves a 93.2% Attack Success Rate with a poisoning rate under 2%, while maintaining a 95.3% Clean Task Success Rate.

Abstract:
Grounding events in videos serves as a fundamental capability in video analysis. While Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly employed for this task, existing approaches predominantly train models to associate events with timestamps in the forward video only. This paradigm hinders VLMs from capturing the inherent temporal structure and directionality of events, thereby limiting robustness and generalization. To address this limitation, inspired by the arrow of time in physics, which characterizes the intrinsic directionality of temporal processes, we propose ArrowGEV, a reinforcement learning framework that explicitly models temporal directionality in events to improve both event grounding and temporal directionality understanding in VLMs. Specifically, we categorize events into time-sensitive (e.g., putting down a bag) and time-insensitive (e.g., holding a towel in the left hand). The former denote events whose reversal substantially alters their meaning, while the latter remain semantically unchanged under reversal. For time-sensitive events, ArrowGEV introduces a reward that encourages VLMs to discriminate between forward and backward videos, whereas for time-insensitive events, it enforces consistent grounding across both directions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ArrowGEV not only improves grounding precision and temporal directionality recognition, but also enhances general video understanding and reasoning ability.

Abstract:
For humans, filler-gap dependencies require a shared representation across different syntactic constructions. Although causal analyses suggest this may also be true for LLMs (Boguraev et al., 2025), it is still unclear if such a representation also exists for language models trained on developmentally feasible quantities of data. We applied Distributed Alignment Search (DAS, Geiger et al. (2024)) to checkpoints of a language model from the BabyLM challenge (Warstadt et al., 2023), to evaluate whether representations of filler-gap dependencies transfer between wh-questions and topicalization, which greatly vary in terms of their input frequency. Our results suggest shared, yet item-sensitive mechanisms may develop with limited training data. More importantly, LMs still require far more data than humans to learn comparable generalizations, highlighting the need for language-specific biases in models of language acquisition.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful framework for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, most existing RL approaches rely on sparse outcome rewards, which fail to credit correct intermediate steps in partially successful solutions. Process reward models (PRMs) offer fine-grained step-level supervision, but their scores are often noisy and difficult to evaluate. As a result, recent PRM benchmarks focus on a more objective capability: detecting the first incorrect step in a reasoning path. However, this evaluation target is misaligned with how PRMs are typically used in RL, where their step-wise scores are treated as raw rewards to maximize. To bridge this gap, we propose Verifiable Prefix Policy Optimization (VPPO), which uses PRMs only to localize the first error during RL. Given an incorrect rollout, VPPO partitions the trajectory into a verified correct prefix and an erroneous suffix based on the first error, rewarding the former while applying targeted penalties only after the detected mistake. This design yields stable, interpretable learning signals and improves credit assignment. Across multiple reasoning benchmarks, VPPO consistently outperforms sparse-reward RL and prior PRM-guided baselines on both Pass@1 and Pass@K.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) frequently suffer from hallucinations. Existing preference learning-based approaches largely rely on proprietary models to construct preference datasets. We identify that this reliance introduces a distributional mismatch between the proprietary and target models that hinders efficient alignment. To address this, we propose Alignment via VErified Self-correction DPO (AVES-DPO), a framework that aligns LVLMs using in-distribution data derived from the model’s intrinsic knowledge. Our approach employs a consensus-based verification mechanism to diagnose diverse hallucinations and guides the model to self-correct, thereby generating preference pairs strictly compatible with its internal distribution. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AVES-DPO surpasses existing baselines in hallucination mitigation while requiring only 5.2k samples.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, but their proficiency in producing secure code remains a critical, under-explored area. Existing benchmarks often fall short by relying on synthetic vulnerabilities or evaluating functional correctness in isolation, failing to capture the complex interplay between functionality and security found in real-world software. To address this gap, we introduce RealSec-bench, a new benchmark for secure code generation meticulously constructed from real-world, high-risk Java repositories. Our methodology employs a multi-stage pipeline that combines systematic SAST scanning with CodeQL, LLM-based false positive elimination, and rigorous human expert validation. The resulting benchmark contains 105 instances grounded in real-word repository contexts, spanning 19 Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types and exhibiting a wide diversity of data flow complexities, including vulnerabilities with up to 34-hop inter-procedural dependencies. Using RealSec-bench, we conduct an extensive empirical study on 5 popular LLMs. We introduce a novel composite metric, SecurePass@K, to assess both functional correctness and security simultaneously. We find that while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques can improve functional correctness, they provide negligible benefits to security. Furthermore, explicitly prompting models with general security guidelines often leads to compilation failures, harming functional correctness without reliably preventing vulnerabilities. Our work highlights the gap between functional and secure code generation in current LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/Realsec-code-Bench.

Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel in-context learning approach to support low resource machine translation for the Coptic language, using prompts based on Universal Dependencies parses of input sentences. Building on existing work using bilingual dictionaries to support inference for vocabulary items, we add several representations of syntactic analyses to our inputs, specifically exploring the inclusion of raw parser outputs, verbalizations of parses in plain English, and explanations of specific difficult constructions identified in input subgraphs and how they can be translated. Our results show that while syntactic information alone is not as useful as dictionary-based glosses, combining retrieved dictionary items with syntactic information achieves significant gains across model sizes, achieving new state-of-the-art results for the language.

Abstract:
Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) provide reasoning and inquiry guidance for physicians, yet they face notable challenges, including high maintenance costs and low generalization capability.Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in healthcare due to their extensive knowledge reserves, retrieval, and communication capabilities. While LLMs show promise and excel at medical benchmarks, their diagnostic reasoning and inquiry skills are constrained.To mitigate this issue, we propose (1) Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Data (CDRD) structure to capture abstract clinical reasoning logic, and a pipeline for its construction, and (2) the Dr. Assistant, a clinical diagnostic model equipped with clinical reasoning and inquiry skills. Its training involves a two-stage process: SFT, followed by RL with a tailored reward function.We also introduce a benchmark to evaluate both diagnostic reasoning and inquiry.Our experiments demonstrate that the Dr. Assistant outperforms open-source models and achieves competitive performance to closed-source models, providing an effective solution for clinical diagnostic inquiry guidance. Project information can be found at: https://github.com/YGswu/Dr.-Assistant.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often suffer from modality bias, where the model disproportionately relies on one modality while neglecting critical information from others. Existing debiasing methods via modality masking create biased responses by completely removing an entire modality, forming an extreme and static training environment. However, real-world multimodal bias often emerges under subtle perturbations (e.g., mild occlusion, noisy instructions), where both modalities are present but the model is tempted to rely on spurious shortcuts. We propose B-APO (Bias-Targeted Adversarial Preference Optimization), which casts debiasing as a bias-targeted min-max game: we generate hard negatives by applying small adversarial perturbations in the latent space to maximally induce language-vision-prior reliance, and then perform preference alignment to enlarge the margin between clean and adversarial responses. This encourages the model to anchor on true cross-modal evidence even under the most adversarial conditions. Extensive experiments on bias and hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that B-APO achieves superior debiasing performance while maintaining general capabilities.

Abstract:
Automatic evaluation metrics are essential for building multilingual translation systems. The common practice of evaluating these systems is averaging metric scores across languages, yet this is suspicious since metrics may suffer from cross-lingual scoring bias, where translations of equal quality receive different scores across languages. This problem has not been systematically studied because no benchmark exists that provides parallel-quality instances across languages, and expert annotation is not realistic. In this work, we propose XQ-MEval, a semi-automatically built dataset covering nine translation directions, to benchmark translation metrics. Specifically, we inject MQM-defined errors into gold translations automatically, filter them by native speakers for reliability, and merge errors to generate pseudo translations with controllable quality. These pseudo translations are then paired with corresponding sources and references to form triplets used in assessing the qualities of translation metrics. Using XQ-MEval, our experiments on nine representative metrics reveal the inconsistency between averaging and human judgment and provide the first empirical evidence of cross-lingual scoring bias. Finally, we propose a normalization strategy derived from XQ-MEval that aligns score distributions across languages, improving the fairness and reliability of multilingual metric evaluation.

Abstract:
This paper studies the problem of test-time adaptation for vision-language models (VLMs). Recent approaches typically measure the prediction entropy to store a confident cache for logit refinement. However, these confident samples tend to approach prototypes with limited coverage of data distribution, which could result in biased predictions as the distribution evolves. Towards this end, we propose a novel approach named Diversity-attended Dynamic Caching with Asymmetric Quantization (DANCE) for test-time adaptation of VLMs. The core of our DANCE is to maintain a dynamic cache to store diversity-aware test samples, which support efficient logit adjustment via asymmetric quantization. In particular, we first generate multiple augmented views of each sample and aggregate their outputs from pre-trained VLMs via a consistency-aware mechanism. More importantly, we construct a dynamic cache, which stores the most reliable and diverse samples to cover evolving test distributions. To measure the diversity efficiently, we quantize cached samples and compute the asymmetric similarity across query samples and memory samples, which guide the cache updating via replacing samples with the lowest scores iteratively. Finally, we leverage the asymmetric similarity between the quantized prototype representations from the dynamic cache to update logits under distribution shifts. Extensive experiments on various benchmark datasets validate the superiority of the proposed DANCE in different settings.

Abstract:
Translation-based prompting is widely used in multilingual LLMs, yet its effectiveness varies across languages and tasks. We evaluate prompting strategies across ten languages of different resource levels and four benchmarks. Our analysis shows that no single strategy is universally optimal. Translation strongly benefits low-resource languages even when translation quality is imperfect, high-resource languages gain little, and prompt-based self-routing underperforms explicit translation. Motivated by these findings, we formulate prompting strategy selection as a learned decision problem and introduce lightweight classifiers that predict whether native or translation-based prompting is optimal for each instance. The classifiers achieve statistically significant improvements over fixed strategies across four benchmarks and generalize to unseen task formats not observed during training. Further analysis reveals that language resource level, rather than translation quality alone, determines when translation is beneficial.

Abstract:
Metaphors are powerful framing devices, yet their source domains alone do not fully explain the specific associations they evoke. We argue that the interplay between source domains and semantic frames determines how metaphors shape understanding of complex issues, and present a computational framework that allows to derive salient discourse metaphors through their source domains and semantic frames. Applying this framework to climate change news, we uncover not only well-known source domains but also reveal nuanced frame-level associations that distinguish how the issue is portrayed. In analyzing immigration discourse across political ideologies, we demonstrate that liberals and conservatives systematically employ different semantic frames within the same source domains, with conservatives favoring frames emphasizing uncontrollability and liberals choosing neutral or more “victimizing” semantic frames. Our work bridges conceptual metaphor theory and linguistics, providing the first NLP approach for discovery of discourse metaphors and fine-grained analysis of differences in metaphorical framing.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly entrusted with high-stakes decisions that affect human welfare. However, the principles and values that guide these models when distributing scarce societal resources remain largely unexamined. To address this, we introduce the Social Welfare Function (SWF) Benchmark, a dynamic simulation environment in which an LLM acts as a dictator, distributing tasks to heterogeneous recipients with different returns on investment (ROI). The benchmark is designed to create a dilemma between maximizing collective efficiency (i.e., overall ROI) and ensuring distributive fairness (measured by the Gini coefficient). We evaluate 20 state-of-the-art LLMs. Our findings reveal several key insights, including: (i) LLMs’ general ability, as measured by popular Arena leaderboards, misaligns with their allocation skills; (ii) Most LLMs exhibit a strong default utilitarian orientation, prioritizing overall productivity at the expense of inequality. (iii) Allocation behaviors are highly manipulated, easily perturbed by common persuasion strategies. These results highlight the risks of deploying current LLMs as societal decision-makers and underscore the need for specialized benchmarks and alignment for AI governance.

Abstract:
Large language models exhibit surprising sensitivity to the structure of the prompt, but the mechanisms underlying this sensitivity remain poorly understood. In this work, we conduct an in-depth investigation on a striking case: in multiple-choice question answering, placing context before the questions and options (CQO) outperforms the reverse order (QOC) by over 14%p, consistently over a wide range of models and datasets. Through systematic architectural analysis, we identify causal attention as the core mechanism: in QOC prompts, the causal mask prevents option tokens from attending to context, creating an information bottleneck where context becomes invisible to options.

Abstract:
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated the capacity for multi-modal reasoning, current Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) benchmarks lag behind, predominantly relying on intra-image cues and neglecting the integration of external world knowledge, which significantly impedes the evolution of REC towards real-world applications. This limitation obscures a model’s true capability to conduct textual reasoning (entity resolution), resolve spatial location (visual grounding), and verify reference validity (hallucination rejection). To address this, we introduce KnowDR-REC, a targeted audit benchmark comprising 1,042 positive triplets derived from real-world knowledge, along with rigorously matched negative samples. Unlike traditional datasets, we implement a controllable counterfactual evaluation mechanism that subjects textual expressions to single-factor perturbations (entity, relation, or time) to test sensitivity to fine-grained factual changes. Extensive evaluation of 18 state-of-the-art LMMs exposes a critical “binding hallucination,” revealing that current high performance is often built on fragile visual shortcuts rather than true understanding. KnowDR-REC thus serves as a pivotal diagnostic instrument, steering future research toward the genuine integration of perception and reasoning.

Abstract:
Social media platforms have become critical arenas for public discourse, yet existing stance detection methods often reduce opinions to surface-level labels, overlooking the conversational evidence behind stance expressions. We introduce Conversational Stance-Cause Pair Detection (CSCPD), a new task that jointly identifies both the stance polarity and its observable contextual evidence within multi-turn conversations. To advance research in this direction, we present Cause-CSD, the first large-scale dataset for CSCPD, spanning 21,048 annotated stance-cause pairs across diverse open-domain, textual, and multimodal discussions. We further propose Stance-Cause Detection Language Model (SCD-LM), a unified language model framework that leverages explicit context reasoning and joint decoding to predict stances and their supporting causes, along with human-readable rationales. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SCD-LM achieves state-of-the-art results on both text-only and multimodal subtasks, significantly outperforming strong baselines, especially for long-range and image-grounded cause detection. Our work advances explainable stance analysis and underpins understanding of public opinion drivers in impactful online settings.

Abstract:
LLM-based evaluation systems (LLM judges) have emerged as a scalable alternative to expensive human evaluations. Although LLM judges demonstrate 70-80% agreement with human evaluators, their robustness under semantically equivalent prompt variations remains underexplored. Through systematic evaluation of 8 models across 4 NLG tasks using 10 semantically equivalent paraphrases per prompt (~115000 evaluations), we identify a critical accuracy-robustness gap: attribute verifiability affects the robustness more than model choice, with factually verifiable attributes achieving 0.71 accuracy versus 0.19 for subjective attributes. Our investigations discover three key insights: 1) Task structure characteristics influence the robustness and in turn accuracy, 2) Attribute verifiability as the strongest predictor-factually verifiable attribute achieve 0.71 accuracy versus 0.19 for subjective attributes, 3) No single winning model-smallest model (Llama-3.1-8B) exhibits second-best performance, while the strongest model (Llama-4) from the same family significantly lag behind, thus demonstrating that general capability improvements do not necessarily result in evaluation robustness. With these findings, we propose a diagnostic framework grounded in attribute verifiability that enables principled decisions about evaluation automation. Our work establishes new standards for assessing LLM judge reliability beyond simple accuracy metrics.

Abstract:
Current financial benchmarks prioritize large language models (LLMs) for task accuracy and portfolio returns, yet overlook risks arising from multi-agent cooperation, tool-sharing, and real-world financial actions. We introduce M-SAEA, a Multi-agent, Safety-Aware Evaluation Agent that audits LLM teams without fine-tuning, deploying ten probes across four layers: model, workflow, interaction, and system, to yield a continuous risk vector and natural-language rationale. Evaluated across three high-stakes tasks (finance management, webshop automation, transactional services) with six prominent models, M-SAEA (i) identifies unsafe trajectories with minimal false positives, (ii) reveals latent risks (e.g., temporal staleness) that are not addressed by standard metrics, and (iii) provides granular, actionable scores for balancing safety and latency pre-deployment. By quantifying safety as a model-agnostic metric, M-SAEA reorients evaluation from individual tasks to collaborative teams, offering a robust template for risk-first assessment of agentic AI in finance and beyond.

Abstract:
Despite the groundbreaking advancements made by large language models (LLMs), hallucination remains a critical bottleneck for their deployment in high-stakes domains. Existing classification-based methods mainly rely on static and passive signals from internal states, which often captures the noise and spurious correlations, while overlooking the underlying causal mechanisms. To address this limitation, we shift the paradigm from passive observation to active intervention by introducing CausalGaze, a novel hallucination detection framework based on structural causal models (SCMs). CausalGaze models LLMs’ internal states as dynamic causal graphs and employs counterfactual interventions to disentangle causal reasoning paths from incidental noise, thereby enhancing model interpretability. Extensive experiments across four datasets and three widely used LLMs demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalGaze, especially achieving over 5.2% improvement in AUROC on the TruthfulQA dataset compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated considerable promise in enhancing large language models. However, its application to Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures is frequently hindered by training instability, primarily stemming from token-level misalignment in expert assignments between current and behavior policies. Existing approaches often oscillate between overly coarse sequence-level importance sampling, which ignores token-specific discrepancies, and restrictive expert-selection constraints that suppress beneficial policy exploration. To bridge this gap, we propose Expert Relative Policy Optimization (ERPO), which introduces expert-level importance sampling. By grouping tokens according to their routing assignments, ERPO mitigates the high variance of token-level importance sampling while overcoming the token-agnostic limitations of sequence-level methods. Furthermore, ERPO leverages this expert-centric granularity to introduce an Expert-Selection Entropy Reward, which dynamically adjusts routing uncertainty based on task-specific feedback. This unique mechanism ensures a rigorous alignment between reward signals and policy updates—a capability inherently unattainable by traditional importance sampling methods. Experimental results demonstrate that ERPO significantly outperforms strong baselines across multiple reasoning tasks, highlighting the efficacy of tailoring RL objectives to the structural inductive biases of MoE models.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable zero-shot generalization, adapting them to downstream tasks or shifting data distributions often requires continual fine-tuning—a process prone to catastrophic forgetting and limited knowledge transfer. This challenge is especially pronounced in online Incremental Learning (IL) settings, where task boundaries are blurred, and data arrives in a non-stationary stream. To address these issues, we propose GROLE (Group Relative Optimization for LoRA Experts), a novel approach that incrementally constructs a pool of frozen, task-specific Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) experts. At its core, GROLE employs a lightweight, instance-level expert selector optimized through a group relative reinforcement learning objective, which dynamically combines relevant experts to maximize adaptability without compromising stability. Extensive experiments across diverse incremental learning benchmarks show that GROLE consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, particularly in task-free and blurred-boundary settings, achieving an optimal balance between plasticity and robustness.

Abstract:
Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) aims to answer questions that require multi-step reasoning. The complexity of user queries, coupled with potential knowledge deficiencies in Large Language Models (LLMs), gives rise to two pivotal challenges that underpin the performance on this task: the correct identification of the reasoning path and the accurate retrieval of essential knowledge. Existing approaches primarily rely on prompt-based methods to generate reasoning paths, which are further combined with traditional sparse or dense retrieval to produce the final answer. However, the generation of reasoning paths commonly lacks effective control over the generative process, thus leading the reasoning astray. Meanwhile, the retrieval methods over-rely on knowledge matching or similarity scores rather than evaluating the practical utility of the information, resulting in retrieving homogeneous or non-useful information. Therefore, we propose a Structured Entity-Aware Retrieval with Chain-of-Reasoning Navigator framework named SEARCH-R. Specifically, SEARCH-R trains an end-to-end reasoning path navigator, which is able to provide a powerful sub-question decomposer by fine-tuning the Llama3.1-8B model. Moreover, a novel dependency tree-based retrieval is designed to evaluate the informational contribution of the document quantitatively. Extensive experiments on three challenging multi-hop datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/Applied-Machine-Learning-Lab/ACL2026_SEARCH-R.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated success in decision-making tasks including planning, control, and prediction, but their tendency to hallucinate unsafe and undesired outputs poses risks. This unwanted behavior is further exacerbated in environments where sensors are noisy or unreliable. Characterizing the behavior of LLM planners to varied observations is necessary to proactively avoid failures in safety-critical scenarios. We specifically investigate the response of LLMs along two different perturbation dimensions. Like prior works, one dimension generates semantically similar prompts with varied phrasing by randomizing order of details, modifying access to few-shot examples, etc. Unique to our work, the second dimension simulates access to varied sensors and noise to mimic raw sensor or detection algorithm failures. An initial case study in which perturbations are manually applied show that both dimensions lead LLMs to hallucinate in a multi-agent driving environment. However, manually covering the entire perturbation space for several scenarios is infeasible. As such, we propose a novel method for efficiently searching the space of prompt perturbations using adaptive stress testing (AST) with Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS). Our AST formulation enables discovery of scenarios, sensor configurations, and prompt phrasing that cause language models to act with high uncertainty or even crash. By generating MCTS prompt perturbation trees across diverse scenarios, we show through extensive experiments that offline analyses can be used to proactively understand potential failures that may arise at runtime. Code is available at https://sites.google.com/illinois.edu/astllm/.

Abstract:
Gödel agent realize recursive self-improvement: an agent inspects its own policy and traces and then modifies that policy in a tested loop. We introduce Polaris, a Gödel agent for compact models that performs policy repair via experience abstraction, turning failures into policy updates through a structured cycle of analysis, strategy formation, abstraction, and minimal code patch repair with conservative checks. Unlike response level self-correction or parameter tuning, Polaris makes policy level changes with small, auditable patches that persist in the policy and are reused on unseen instances within each benchmark. As part of the loop, the agent engages in meta reasoning: it explains its errors, proposes concrete revisions to its own policy, and then updates the policy. To enable cumulative policy refinement, we introduce experience abstraction, which distills failures into compact, reusable strategies that transfer to unseen instances. On MGSM, DROP, GPQA, and LitBench (covering arithmetic reasoning, compositional inference, graduate-level problem solving, and creative writing evaluation), a 7-billion-parameter model equipped with Polaris achieves consistent gains over the base policy and competitive baselines.

Abstract:
Cross-document relation extraction (RE) aims to identify relations between the head and tail entities located in different documents. Existing approaches typically adopt the paradigm of “ Small Language Model (SLM) + Classifier ”. However, the limited language understanding ability of SLMs hinders further improvement of their performance. In this paper, we conduct a preliminary study to explore the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in cross-document RE. Despite their extensive parameters, our findings indicate that LLMs do not consistently surpass existing SLMs. Further analysis suggests that the underperformance is largely attributed to the challenges posed by the numerous predefined relations. To overcome this issue, we propose an LLM-based Hierarchical Classification model for cross-document RE (HCRE), which consists of two core components: 1) an LLM for relation prediction and 2) a hierarchical relation tree derived from the predefined relation set. This tree enables the LLM to perform hierarchical classification, where the target relation is inferred level by level. Since the number of child nodes is much smaller than the size of entire predefined relation set, the hierarchical relation tree significantly reduces the number of relation options that LLM needs to consider during inference. However, hierarchical classification introduces the risk of error propagation across levels. To mitigate this, we propose a prediction-then-verification inference strategy that improves prediction reliability through multi-view verification at each level. Extensive experiments show that HCRE outperforms existing baselines, validating its effectiveness.

Abstract:
Large Language Models are increasingly deployed for decision-making, yet their adoption in high-stakes domains remains limited by miscalibrated probabilities, unfaithful explanations, and inability to incorporate expert knowledge precisely. We propose IDEA, a framework that extracts LLM decision knowledge into an interpretable parametric model over semantically meaningful factors. Through joint learning of verbal-to-numerical mappings and decision parameters via EM, correlated sampling that preserves factor dependencies, and direct parameter editing with mathematical guarantees, IDEA produces calibrated probabilities while enabling quantitative human-AI collaboration. Experiments across five datasets show IDEA with Qwen-3-32B (78.6%) outperforms DeepSeek R1 (68.1%) and GPT-5.2 (77.9%), achieving perfect factor exclusion and exact calibration—precision unattainable through prompting alone.

Abstract:
Recent works have increasingly applied Large Language Models (LLMs) as agents in financial stock market simulations to test if micro-level behaviors aggregate into macro-level phenomena. However, a crucial question arises: Do LLM agents’ behaviors align with real market participants? This alignment is key to the validity of simulation results. To explore this, we select a financial stock market scenario to test behavioral consistency. Investors are typically classified as fundamental or technical traders, but most simulations fix strategies at initialization, failing to reflect real-world trading dynamics. In this work, we assess whether agents’ strategy switching aligns with financial theory, providing a framework for this evaluation. We operationalize four behavioral-finance drivers—loss aversion, herding, wealth differentiation, and price misalignment—as personality traits set via prompting and stored long-term. In year-long simulations, agents process daily price-volume data, trade under a designated style, and reassess their strategy every 10 trading days. We introduce four alignment metrics and use Mann–Whitney U tests to compare agents’ style-switching behavior with financial theory. Our results show that recent LLMs’ switching behavior is only partially consistent with behavioral-finance theories, highlighting the need for further refinement in aligning agent behavior with financial theory.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a key technique for enhancing LLMs’ reasoning abilities, yet its data inefficiency remains a major bottleneck. To address this critical yet challenging issue, we present a novel gradient-alignment-based method, named LearnAlign, which intelligently selects the learnable and representative training reasoning data for RLVR post-training. To overcome the well-known response-length bias in gradient norms, we introduce the data learnability based on the success rate, which indicates the learning potential of each data point. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks show that our method significantly reduces training data requirements while achieving minor performance degradation or even improving performance compared to full-data training. Specifically, it reduces data requirements by up to 1,000 data points with better performance (77.5%) than that on the full dataset on the GSM8K benchmark (77.0%). Furthermore, its efficiency is demonstrated on both mathematical and code benchmarks by using much less data from the DAPO-MATH-17K dataset.

Abstract:
Evolutionary agentic systems intensify the trade-off between computational efficiency and reasoning capability by repeatedly invoking large language models (LLMs) during inference. This setting raises a central question: how can an agent dynamically select an LLM that is sufficiently capable for the current generation step while remaining computationally efficient? While model cascades offer a practical mechanism for balancing this trade-off, existing routing strategies typically rely on static heuristics or external controllers and do not explicitly account for model uncertainty. We introduce AdaptEvolve: Adaptive LLM Selection for Multi-LLM Evolutionary Refinement within an evolutionary sequential refinement framework that leverages intrinsic generation confidence to estimate real-time solvability. Empirical results show that confidence-driven selection yields a favorable Pareto frontier, reducing total inference cost by an average of 37.9% across benchmarks while retaining 97.5% of the upper-bound accuracy of static large-model baselines.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in molecular understanding by aligning molecular representations with text. However, existing approaches remain limited to static motif recognition without comprehending the generative principles—the connection rules governing how motifs assemble into valid topological structures. To address this challenge, we introduce MotifAgent, a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework inspired by emergent collective intelligence. We formulate molecular assembly as a collaborative problem where each motif is represented by an agent sharing a common LLM backbone, learning connection rules through explicit inter-motif negotiation rather than implicit sequence memorization. Key innovations include: (1) dynamic inter-agent negotiation for modeling motif connections; (2) Set-based Behavioral Cloning for learning multiple topologically equivalent assembly paths; (3) topology-aware reward shaping with MAPPO to maintain chemical validity while optimizing target properties. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MotifAgent achieves state-of-the-art performance across molecular property prediction, description generation, and reaction prediction tasks, with our generalist model surpassing specialized expert models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative tasks such as literary translation. Yet translational creativity remains underexplored and is rarely evaluated at scale, while source-text comprehension is typically studied in isolation, despite the fact that, in professional translation, comprehension and creativity are tightly intertwined. We address these gaps with a paired-task framework applied to literary excerpts from 11 books. Task 1 assesses source-text comprehension, and Task 2 evaluates translational creativity through Units of Creative Potential (UCPs), such as metaphors and wordplay. Using a scalable evaluation setup that combines expert human annotations with UCP-based automatic scoring, we benchmark 23 models and four creativity-oriented prompts. Our findings show that strong comprehension does not translate into human-level creativity: models often produce literal or contextually inappropriate renderings, with particularly large gaps for the more distant English–Chinese language pair. Creativity-oriented prompts yield only modest gains, and only one model, Mistral-Large, comes close to human-level creativity (0.167 vs. 0.246). Across all model–prompt combinations, only three exceed a creativity score of 0.1, while the rest remain at or near zero.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have fundamentally reshaped artificial intelligence by integrating external tools and planning capabilities. While memory mechanisms have emerged as the architectural cornerstone of these systems, current research remains fragmented, oscillating between operating system engineering and cognitive science. This theoretical divide prevents a unified view of technological synthesis and a coherent evolutionary perspective. To bridge this gap, this survey proposes a novel evolutionary framework for LLM agent memory mechanisms, formalizing the development process into three stages: Storage (trajectory preservation), Reflection (trajectory refinement), and Experience (trajectory abstraction). We first formally define these three stages before analyzing the three core drivers of this evolution: the necessity for long-range consistency, the challenges in dynamic environments, and the ultimate goal of continual learning. Furthermore, we specifically explore two transformative mechanisms in the frontier Experience stage: proactive exploration and cross-trajectory abstraction. By synthesizing these disparate views, this work offers robust design principles and a clear roadmap for the development of next-generation LLM agents.

Abstract:
Improving the quality of model-generated summaries, especially factuality, the accuracy of a summary with respect to its source content, remains a challenge. While reranking could select the optimal output from multiple generated candidates, it is limited to only using the source as guidance, resulting in unreliable summaries. To address this limitation, we propose ConSUM that reranks candidate summaries by considering two factors: consistency to the source document and consensus among the other candidates. Consensus is established using Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding over the set of generated summaries, while ensuring consistency by employing factuality-aware metrics that compare the summary against the source. Rigorous testing demonstrates that our system is competitive with existing methods, with human evaluations further confirming that its generated summaries are preferred over those from other systems.

Abstract:
Recent advances in post-training techniques have endowed Large Language Models (LLMs) with enhanced capabilities for tackling complex, logic-intensive tasks through the generation of supplementary planning tokens. This development raises a fundamental question – Are these models aware of what they "learn” and "think”? To address this, we define three core competencies: (1) awareness of learned latent policies, (2) generalization of these policies across domains, and (3) alignment between internal reasoning traces and final outputs. We empirically evaluate these abilities on several tasks, each designed to require learning a distinct policy. Furthermore, we contrast the profiles of models post-trained via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Policy Optimization (DPO), and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Our findings indicate that RL-trained models not only demonstrate greater awareness of their learned behaviors and stronger generalizability to novel, structurally similar tasks than SFT models but also often exhibit weak alignment between their reasoning traces and final outputs, an effect most pronounced in GRPO-trained models.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) watermarking has been proposed as an active approach for content provenance verification, yet existing evaluations are largely confined to fixed entropy settings. In this paper, we introduce EntroBench, a benchmark for LLM watermarking that systematically covers three entropy levels and seven representative tasks. We conducted a fair evaluation of eight watermarking methods through hyper-parameter search based on an anchored dataset. We find that current approaches struggle to perform consistently across different entropy levels. Our analysis reveals a clear trade-off between watermark detectability and downstream output quality that varies across tasks and entropy conditions. Furthermore, we assess watermark robustness under realistic user interaction scenarios and show that common, non-adversarial user behaviors can substantially degrade watermark signals. These results indicate that practical usage-driven perturbations pose a significant challenge to current watermarking techniques. EntroBench provides a unified evaluation framework for studying these issues and supports the development of more adaptive and robust LLM watermarking methods. Dataset and codes are available at https://github.com/py-qin/EntroBench.

Abstract:
With Large Language Models (LLMs) rapidly approaching and potentially surpassing human-level performance, it has become imperative to develop approaches capable of effectively supervising and enhancing these powerful models using smaller, human-level models exposed to only human-level data. We address this critical weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization challenge by proposing a novel method aimed at improving weak experts, by training on the same limited human-level data, enabling them to generalize to complex, super-human-level tasks. Our approach, called EnsemW2S, employs a token-level ensemble strategy that iteratively combines multiple weak experts, systematically addressing the shortcomings identified in preceding iterations. By continuously refining these weak models, we significantly enhance their collective ability to supervise stronger student models. We extensively evaluate the generalization performance of both the ensemble of weak experts and the subsequent strong student model across in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets. For OOD, we specifically introduce question difficulty as an additional dimension for defining distributional shifts. Our empirical results demonstrate notable improvements, achieving 4%, and 3.2% improvements on ID datasets and, upto 6% and 2.28% on OOD datasets for experts and student models respectively, underscoring the effectiveness of our proposed method in advancing W2S generalization.

Abstract:
Although large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as annotators at scale, they are typically treated as a pragmatic fallback rather than a faithful estimator of human perspectives. This work challenges that presumption. By framing perspective-taking as the estimation of a latent group-level judgment, we characterize the conditions under which modern LLMs can outperform human annotators, including in-group humans, when predicting aggregate subgroup opinions on subjective tasks, and show that these conditions are common in practice. This advantage arises from structural properties of LLMs as estimators, including low variance and reduced coupling between representation and processing biases, rather than any claim of lived experience. Our analysis identifies clear regimes where LLMs act as statistically superior frontline estimators, as well as principled limits where human judgment remains essential. These findings reposition LLMs from a cost-saving compromise to a principled tool for estimating collective human perspectives.

Abstract:
Emotional support conversation (ESC) aims to alleviate users’ psychological stress. Selecting the appropriate strategy is crucial for effective emotional support. Current strategy planner-based methods prioritize immediate responses while neglecting users’ future reactions. Some studies retrieve historical examples with similar emotions to the current utterance, then anticipating future emotions based on next-turn emotions of historical examples. However, their retrievals focus on the current emotion (i.e. a single-turn emotion state), while they ignore the evolution of user’s emotion before the current state. We argue that retrievals considering the whole emotional trajectories enables models to capture the dynamic emotional needs, thereby enhancing the anticipation of future emotions. To this end, we propose Markov-driven emotion anticipation framework with emotion trajectory-aware retrieval for LLM-based ESC, which anticipates future emotion states to guide strategy planning and achieve sustained emotional support. First, we construct a dynamic emotion memory and perform hierarchical retrieval that combines semantic matching and emotion trajectory alignment. Then, we model emotional transitions as Markov chains, leveraging trajectory-aware retrieval to estimate future emotion. Finally, we use the anticipated emotion to steer LLMs in generating candidate strategies and introduce active online learning to optimize the planner, boosting its robustness on diverse users. Experiments on two datasets with two models shows that our method excels all baselines.

Abstract:
Harmful memes convey offensive intent through implicit associations between visual symbols and text, requiring a broad understanding of cultural stereotypes and visual metaphors. Small-scale Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often lack the knowledge required to identify such implicit hate, whereas Large-scale MLLMs, despite their broader knowledge, exhibit systematic labeling bias. To address these challenges, we propose DR-HM, a Distill-then-Reinforce training framework with cognition-aware data synthesis for harmful meme detection, which aims to transfer knowledge from closed-source models while mitigating their biases. DR-HM introduces a six-step structured data synthesis scheme with self-refinement that decomposes meme analysis into a progressive, human-inspired reasoning process from entity recognition to harmfulness judgment. Based on the synthesized reasoning data, we further adopt a Distill-then-Reinforce training strategy. This approach combines a two-stage Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) with an Adaptive Group Relative Policy Optimization (A-GRPO) algorithm, which incorporates class-ratio-aware reward weighting and dynamic KL coefficients. Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that the proposed approach consistently outperforms existing methods and achieves an accuracy of 84.7% on the FHM dataset, approaching the reported performance of human annotators.

Abstract:
Resolving anaphora requires integrating syntactic, semantic, and discourse information. Mandarin Chinese offers a particularly revealing case through the reflexive ziji, whose interpretation permits long-distance binding licensed by logophoric cues (i.e., cues relevant to discourse perspective). While these cues have been extensively studied in linguistic theory and psycholinguistic experiments, it remains an open question to what extent such cues are captured by computational models.We investigate this question by probing large language models’ sensitivity to four logophoric cues known to license long-distance binding of ziji: predicate type, perspective marking, discourse topicality, and discourse relation. Using minimal pairs and surprisal-based measures, we assess whether models exhibit systematic biases toward non-local antecedents in logophoric contexts.Across two model families, we find that (i) models exhibit above-chance sensitivity to all four cues; (ii) lexically anchored cues are more robustly captured than discourse-level cues; and (iii) some cues generalize cross-lingually, whereas others appear to depend on language-specific training data. Taken together, these findings provide non-English evidence that large language models capture certain aspects of logophoricity, yet continue to struggle with discourse-level representations that are central to human anaphora resolution. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/yunfang-dong/mandarin-logophoricity-llm

Abstract:
Providing accurate reward signals for code generated by large language models (LLMs) is a significant challenge in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to code generation. Existing methods rely on unit tests to evaluate code correctness and provide rewards, which are hindered by the difficulty of acquiring and verifying reliable unit tests at scale. In this work, we propose CodeRM-NT, a code reward model with no reliance on unit tests. Our method leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search guided by LLMs to generate code snippets and judges execution traces to annotate code with reward signals. We use the rewards to train CodeRM-NT that is capable of providing rewards for code during RL. CodeRM-NT also facilitates curriculum learning by scoring and sorting training samples based on their difficulty. Experimental results demonstrate that training with CodeRM-NT consistently outperforms synthetic unit test-based rewards, yielding superior performance on multiple code generation benchmarks. Additionally, curriculum learning based on CodeRM-NT further enhances model performance. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/THUDM/CodeRM-NT.

Abstract:
Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used for open-ended idea generation, driven by the expectation that collective interaction will broaden the exploration diversity. However, when and why such collaboration truly expands the solution space remains unclear. We present a systematic empirical study of diversity in MAS-based ideation across three bottom-up levels: model intelligence, agent cognition, and system dynamics. At the model level, we identify a compute efficiency paradox, where stronger, highly aligned models yield diminishing marginal diversity despite higher per-sample quality. At the cognition level, authority-driven dynamics suppress semantic diversity compared to junior-dominated groups. At the system level, group-size scaling yields diminishing returns and dense communication topologies accelerate premature convergence. We characterize these outcomes as collective failures emerging from structural coupling, a process where interaction inadvertently contracts agent exploration and triggers diversity collapse. Our analysis shows that this collapse arises primarily from the interaction structure rather than inherent model insufficiency, highlighting the importance of preserving independence and disagreement when designing MAS for creative tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/MAS_Diversity.

Abstract:
Multilingual ASR systems often fail to generalize to low-resource and linguistically diverse languages while remaining costly to scale. We introduce PUMA, a unified multilingual ASR model that improves low-resource performance with reduced model complexity. PUMA employs a Universal Language Projection (ULP) module that integrates a learnable language token with acoustic representations, enabling language-aware processing through shared parameters. Experiments on diverse African languages show consistent word error rate reductions over strong multilingual baselines, highlighting improved robustness and generalization. Our code is available at the following GitHub URL: https://github.com/ilyes-okd/PUMA

Abstract:
The rise of reasoning models necessitates large-scale verifiable data, for which programming tasks serve as an ideal source. However, while competitive programming platforms provide abundant problems and solutions, high-quality test cases for verification remain scarce. Existing approaches attempt to synthesize test cases using Large Language Models (LLMs), but rely solely on the model’s intrinsic generation capabilities without external feedback, frequently resulting in insufficiently diverse cases. To address this limitation, we propose a Feedback-Driven Iterative Framework for comprehensive test case construction. Specifically, our method leverages the LLM to generate initial test cases, executes them against known correct and incorrect solutions, and utilizes the failed results as feedback to guide the LLM in refining the test cases toward high fidelity and discriminability. We then apply this method to the CodeContests dataset to construct an optimized high-quality derivative, CodeContests-O . Evaluating against the entire pool of solutions ( 1.1 × 10 7 in total), our dataset achieves an average True Positive Rate (TPR) of 89.35% and True Negative Rate (TNR) of 90.30%, significantly outperforming the CodeContests and CodeContests+ by margins of 4.30% and 8.78%, respectively. Furthermore, fine-tuning the Qwen2.5-7B model on CodeContests-O results in a 9.52% improvement on LiveCodeBench (Pass@1). Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework and the quality of CodeContests-O.

Abstract:
With the rapid advancement of agent-based methods in recent years, Agentic RAG has undoubtedly become an important research direction. Multi-hop reasoning, which requires models to engage in deliberate thinking and multi-step interaction, serves as a critical testbed for assessing such capabilities. However, existing benchmarks typically provide only final questions and answers, while lacking the intermediate hop-level questions that gradually connect atomic questions to the final multi-hop query. This limitation prevents researchers from analyzing at which step an agent fails and restricts more fine-grained evaluation of model capabilities. Moreover, most current benchmarks are manually constructed, which is both time-consuming and labor-intensive, while also limiting scalability and generalization. To address these challenges, we introduce AgenticRAGTracer, the first Agentic RAG benchmark that is primarily constructed automatically by large language models and designed to support step-by-step validation. Our benchmark spans multiple domains, contains 1,305 data points, and has no overlap with existing mainstream benchmarks. Extensive experiments demonstrate that even the best large language models perform poorly on our dataset. For instance, GPT-5 attains merely 22.6% EM accuracy on the hardest portion of our dataset. Hop-aware diagnosis reveals that failures are primarily driven by distorted reasoning chains—either collapsing prematurely or wandering into over-extension. This highlights a critical inability to allocate steps consistent with the task’s logical structure, providing a diagnostic dimension missing in traditional evaluations. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/YqjMartin/AgenticRAGTracer.

Abstract:
In mathematical reasoning tasks, the advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) relies heavily on high-quality training data with clearly defined and well-graded difficulty levels. However, existing data synthesis methods often suffer from limited diversity and lack precise control over problem difficulty, making them insufficient for supporting efficient training paradigms such as curriculum learning. To address these challenges, we propose MathMixup, a novel data synthesis paradigm that systematically generates high-quality, difficulty-controllable mathematical reasoning problems through hybrid and decomposed strategies. Automated self-checking and manual screening are incorporated to ensure semantic clarity and a well-structured difficulty gradient in the synthesized data. Building on this, we construct the MathMixupQA dataset and design a curriculum learning strategy that leverages these graded problems, supporting flexible integration with other datasets. Experimental results show that MathMixup and its curriculum learning strategy significantly enhance the mathematical reasoning performance of LLMs. Fine-tuned Qwen2.5-7B achieves an average score of 52.6% across seven mathematical benchmarks, surpassing previous state-of-the-art methods. These results fully validate the effectiveness and broad applicability of MathMixup in improving the mathematical reasoning abilities of LLMs and advancing data-centric curriculum learning.

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable performance across numerous tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) still exhibit notable deficiencies in temporal reasoning, even in simple event ordering tasks. For instance, a slight alteration in the temporal phrasing of the question (e.g., changing "Is event A before B?” to "Is event A after B?") can lead LLMs to hallucinate and produce inconsistent answers, reflecting a lack of robust temporal reasoning. Although many prior studies have focused on benchmarking and improving the temporal reasoning ability of LLMs, little is known about the intrinsic mechanisms within LLMs when performing temporal reasoning. In this work, we investigate the mechanistic interpretability of temporal ordering within event temporal reasoning through a structured "Identify-Interpret-Verify” pipeline. We first employ path patching to identify a sparse subset of attention heads that are causally responsible for reasoning outcomes. Detailed pattern analysis reveals that these key heads specialize in attending to either temporal keywords (semantic cues) or structural delimiters (syntactic cues). Furthermore, we rigorously validate the observed mechanism through comprehensive intervention-based experiments, ranging from head ablation to targeted attention modulation. We demonstrate that dynamically modulating the attention of these specific heads can robustly enhance model performance, which serves as strong empirical evidence that our identified mechanism faithfully captures the internal logic of temporal ordering in LLMs.

Abstract:
Existing hard-label text attacks often rely on inefficient "outside-in" strategies that traverse vast search spaces. We propose PivotAttack, a query-efficient "inside-out" framework. It employs a Multi-Armed Bandit algorithm to identify Pivot Sets—combinatorial token groups acting as prediction anchors—and strategically perturbs them to induce label flips. This approach captures inter-word dependencies and minimizes query costs. Extensive experiments across traditional models and Large Language Models demonstrate that PivotAttack consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both Attack Success Rate and query efficiency.

Abstract:
The deployment of large language models (LLMs) raises significant ethical and safety concerns. While LLM alignment techniques are adopted to improve model safety and trustworthiness, adversaries can exploit these techniques to undermine safety for malicious purposes, resulting in misalignment . Misaligned LLMs may be published on open platforms to magnify harm. To address this, additional safety alignment, referred to as realignment , is necessary before deploying untrusted third-party LLMs. This study explores the efficacy of fine-tuning methods in terms of misalignment, realignment, and the effects of their interplay. By evaluating four Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and two Preference Fine-Tuning (PFT) methods across four popular safety-aligned LLMs, we reveal a mechanism asymmetry between attack and defense. While Odds Ratio Preference Optimization (ORPO) is most effective for misalignment, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) excels in realignment, albeit at the expense of model utility. Additionally, we identify model-specific resistance, residual effects of multi-round adversarial dynamics, and other noteworthy findings. These findings highlight the need for robust safeguards and customized safety alignment strategies to mitigate potential risks in the deployment of LLMs.

Abstract:
The massive size of Large Language Models (LLMs) imposes substantial computational and storage burdens, particularly on devices with limited hardware resources. Compared to foundation models, smaller and more specialized models are often more suitable for practical deployment. Existing customization approaches, such as the conventional “prune-then-finetune” paradigm or task-agnostic deployment strategies, either incur excessive computational costs or lead to suboptimal task performance. The recently popular Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture exhibits a strong ability to mitigate inter-task interference, offering a new perspective on model deployment. In this paper, we introduce ModularMoE, a training framework that converts pre-trained LLMs into parameter-sharing MoE models for lightweight deployment. Exploiting the emergent modularity within LLMs, we split the feed-forward layers into multiple disjoint modules. Each expert is then constructed as a combination of such modules, enabling knowledge sharing across experts and thereby improving parameter efficiency within MoEs. Extensive experiments across multiple downstream tasks demonstrate that ModularMoE outperforms other state-of-the-art baselines at the same sparsity level, achieving an average performance improvement of 4.10% to 28.75% while delivering up to 2.71× inference speedup.

Abstract:
While Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex tasks via long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning, their outputs are often excessively verbose, leading to inefficiency. This problem is amplified when the student’s long-form reasoning mismatches the concise outputs of smaller teacher models—common in LLM distillation to avoid using costly large teachers. To address this issue, we propose Distilled Reasoning Pruning (DRP), a hybrid framework that combines inference-time pruning with tuning-based distillation. DRP leverages a teacher model to perform mathematical problem-solving skill-aware step decomposition and pruning, then distills the refined reasoning paths into a student model, enabling efficient and accurate reasoning. Across challenging math datasets, DRP significantly reduces token usage without sacrificing accuracy—for instance, cutting tokens on GSM8K from 917 to 328 while improving accuracy from 91.7% to 94.1%, and reducing AIME tokens by 43% with no performance drop. Further analysis shows that aligning training CoT structure with the student’s capacity is key to effective knowledge transfer.

Abstract:
The evaluation of societal biases in NLP models is critically hindered by a geo-cultural gap. This leaves regions such as Latin America severely underserved, making it impossible to adequately assess or mitigate the perpetuation of harmful regional stereotypes in language technologies. This paper presents LACES, a stereotype association dataset, for 15 Latin American countries. This dataset includes 4,789 stereotype associations[The de-identified dataset can be accessed via GitHub], manually created and annotated by 83 participants. The dataset was developed through targeted community partnerships across Latin America. Additionally, in this paper, we propose a novel adaptive data collection methodology that uniquely integrates the sourcing of new stereotype entries and the validation of existing data within a single, unified workflow. This approach results in a resource with more unique stereotypes than previous static collection methods, enabling a more efficient stereotype collection. The paper further supports the quality of LACES by demonstrating reduced efficacy of debiasing methods on this dataset in comparison to existing popular stereotype benchmarks.Content Warning: This research involves the study of social biases. Consequently, the paper contains examples of discriminatory language and stereotypes that may be sensitive or upsetting to readers. These examples are included for the purpose of scientific analysis and do not reflect the views of the authors.

Abstract:
Whether the personality of LLMs can be intentionally reshaped remains controversial. Existing studies often limited to small models, argue for its immutability. Crucially, prior studies fail to uncover that different LLMs exhibit significant compliance divergence when exposed to personality-inducing contexts. To bridge this gap, we introduce Personality Induction Framework (PIF), which systematically reshapes the personality of different LLMs via multi-agent collaboration. Specifically, via Generator-Judge agents, PIF paraphrases MBTI questions to create semantically equivalent but expressively diverse inducing contexts, enabling LLMs to learn personality patterns instead of superficial token matching. Also, PIF achieves fine-grained personality modulation by controlling the intensity of inducing contexts. Extensive experiments on worldwide mainstream LLMs show that PIF reliably transforms their original personalities into desired target personalities. Notably, we find that the outputs of most Western LLMs behave like “Chameleons”, exhibiting high personality plasticity; whereas the outputs of most Eastern LLMs act as “Guardians”, manifesting pronounced cognitive resistance. Strikingly, extreme induction intensity (100%) triggers a counter-intuitive “Alignment Rebound” in Guardians, resulting in the opposite direction rather than compliance. These findings suggest that LLM personality is a dynamic equilibrium shaped by the trade-off between instruction compliance and cognitive resistance.

Abstract:
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) enables users to search for target images using both a reference image and manipulation text, offering substantial advantages over single-modality retrieval systems. However, existing CIR methods suffer from representation space fragmentation: queries and targets comprise heterogeneous modalities and are processed by distinct encoders, forcing models to bridge misaligned representation spaces only through post-hoc alignment, which fundamentally limits retrieval performance. As evidenced by t-SNE visualization in Fig.(a), this architectural asymmetry manifests as three distinct, well-separated clusters in the feature space, directly demonstrating how heterogeneous modalities create fundamentally misaligned representation spaces from initialization. In this work, we propose CSMCIR, a unified representation framework that achieves efficient query-target alignment through three synergistic components. First, we introduce a Multi-level Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) prompting strategy that guides Multimodal Large Language Models to generate discriminative, semantically compatible captions for target images, establishing modal symmetry. Building upon this, we design a symmetric dual-tower architecture where both query and target sides utilize the identical shared-parameter Q-Former for cross-modal encoding, ensuring consistent feature representations and further reducing the alignment gap. Finally, this architectural symmetry enables an entropy-based, temporally dynamic Memory Bank strategy that provides high-quality negative samples while maintaining consistency with the evolving model state. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that our CSMCIR achieves state-of-the-art performance with superior training efficiency. Comprehensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of each proposed component.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are known to exhibit gender bias, yet most evaluations focus on downstream stereotypes rather than the normative frameworks that shape model inference. We investigate whether LLMs rely on traditional masculinity norms (e.g. "real men are tough") as latent priors in gender-biased inference. We ground our evaluation in the Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI), a validated psychological framework of prescriptive male role norms.Anchored in MRNI items, we probe models using two complementary approaches: (i) explicit Likert-style agreement with masculinity norms, and (ii) a newly crafted English-Italian scenario-based inference dataset (MRNI-BB), in which gender information and evidential support are systematically varied. Across models, explicit endorsement of masculinity norms is generally low. In contrast, in scenario-based inference tasks, models systematically attribute MRNI-aligned behaviors to male agents, even when evidence is ambiguous or absent. This effect disappears when gender markers are removed, suggesting that masculinity norms are treated as gender-specific expectations about male agents. Increasing model scale reduces explicit norm endorsement but is associated with stronger male-directed bias under uncertainty.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) offer a new paradigm for molecular property prediction (MPP), yet a semantic gap between natural language and molecular representations limits LLMs’ ability to capture structure–activity relationships (SAR). Recent approaches have explored injecting structure-level information into LLMs, primarily modeling associations based on statistical regularities. However, these methods are prone to misinterpreting coincidental associations as general principles, imposing a bottleneck on predictive performance. To tackle the challenges above, we propose MCLE-Mol, an ML–LLM–Rule collaborative framework for MPP. It bridges the semantic gap by injecting ML-derived substructure attribution values into LLMs, utilizing Context-Calibrated Substructure Attribution Rules (CCSAR) to calibrate these attributions under specific chemical contexts to mitigate such misinterpretation. In addition, MCLE-Mol introduces a low-cost continual evolution strategy that updates CCSAR with frozen model parameters to adapt to dynamic chemical spaces. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that MCLE-Mol outperforms all baselines, successfully resolving the trade-off between predictive performance and interpretability.

Abstract:
Predicting earnings surprises through the analysis of earnings conference call transcripts has attracted increasing attention from the financial research community. Conference calls serve as critical communication channels between company executives, analysts, and shareholders, offering valuable forward-looking information. However, these transcripts present significant analytical challenges, typically containing over 5,000 words with substantial redundancy and industry-specific terminology that creates obstacles for language models. In this work, we propose the Sparse Autoencoder for Financial Representation Enhancement (SAE-FiRE) framework to address these limitations by extracting key information while eliminating redundancy. SAE-FiRE employs Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to efficiently identify patterns and filter out noises, and focusing specifically on capturing nuanced financial signals that have predictive power for earnings surprises. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method can significantly outperform comparing baselines.

Abstract:
Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a highly effective paradigm for Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA). Despite recent advancements, prevailing methods still primarily depend on images as the retrieval key, and often overlook or misplace the role of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), thereby failing to leverage their potential fully. In this paper, we introduce WikiSeeker, a novel multi-modal RAG framework that bridges these gaps by implementing a multi-modal retriever and redefining the role of VLMs. Rather than serving merely as answer generators, we assign VLMs two specialized agents: a Refiner and an Inspector. The Refiner utilizes the capability of VLMs to rewrite the textual query according to the input image, significantly improving the performance of the multimodal retriever. The Inspector facilitates a decoupled generation strategy by selectively routing reliable retrieved context to another LLM for answer generation, while relying on the VLM’s internal knowledge when retrieval is unreliable. Extensive experiments on EVQA, InfoSeek, and M2KR demonstrate that WikiSeeker achieves state-of-the-art performance, with substantial improvements in both retrieval accuracy and answer quality.

Abstract:
While transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) theoretically support massive context windows, they suffer from severe performance degradation when processing long numerical sequences. We attribute this failure to the attention dispersion in the Softmax mechanism, which prevents the model from concentrating attention. To overcome this, we propose Sep arate Seq uence ( SepSeq ), a training-free, plug-and-play framework to mitigate dispersion by strategically inserting separator tokens. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that separator tokens act as an attention anchor, recalibrating attention to focus on local segments while preserving global context. Extensive evaluations on 9 widely-adopted LLMs confirm the effectiveness of our approach: SepSeq yields an average relative accuracy improvement of 35.6% across diverse domains while reducing 16.4% inference token consumption.

Abstract:
The proliferation of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has exacerbated concerns regarding model misappropriation and license violations. Malicious users may deploy open-source models as black boxes and falsely claim ownership, sparking significant community interest in fingerprinting techniques for copyright authentication. Current fingerprinting methods largely follow a backdoor-based paradigm, employing specific inputs to elicit predetermined abnormal text outputs. However, such direct distortion of the model’s original predictions compromises modality alignment and inevitably degrades multimodal capabilities, leading to an inherent trade-off between robustness and harmlessness. To address these challenges, we investigate whether it is possible to embed robust fingerprints while maximally preserving the original normal outputs of the model. We propose a Synonym-Aware Logit Shaping Fingerprint (SALSF). The core insight of SALSF lies in reshaping the probability distribution of semantically similar long-tail tokens within the logits space while ensuring the original top-1 prediction token and its probability remain approximately invariant. By elevating the overall prediction probability of the semantic cluster to a level distinctly higher than the natural baseline, our approach stealthily embeds the fingerprint and mitigates the disruption to modality alignment. Experimental results demonstrate that SALSF maintains multimodal performance and substantially enhances fingerprint robustness, offering a novel paradigm for the intellectual property protection of LVLMs.

Abstract:
The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) in code generation has raised critical copyright concerns, particularly regarding the verbatim repetition of copyrighted code. To address this challenge, we propose a novel task: Duplicate-Aware Controlled Code Generation (DACCG), which aims to mitigate verbatim repetition while preserving the quality of generated code. To this end, we introduce Targeted Reordering Beam Search (TRBS), a plug-and-play decoding method that dynamically reorders beam candidates to reduce direct copying. TRBS leverages the FM-index for efficient substring detection and employs a spike-entropy-based protection mechanism to safeguard structural anchors critical to code coherence. Experimental results on a multi-language code generation benchmark demonstrate that TRBS effectively reduces verbatim repetition while maintaining functional adequacy. Our research represents a pioneering effort in code copyright protection from the model user’s perspective, offering novel insights into responsible code generation practices.

Abstract:
Comprehensive software documentation is crucial yet costly to produce. Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs), generating holistic, architecture-aware documentation at the repository level remains challenging due to complex and evolving codebases that exceed LLM context limits. Existing automated methods struggle to capture rich semantic dependencies and architectural structure. We present CodeWiki , a unified framework for automated repository-level documentation across seven mainstream programming languages. CodeWiki combines top-down hierarchical decomposition with a divide-and-conquer agent system to preserve architectural context and scale documentation generation, and a bottom-up synthesis that integrates textual descriptions with visual artifacts such as architecture and data-flow diagrams. We also introduce CodeWikiBench , a benchmark with hierarchical rubrics and LLM-based evaluation protocols. Experiments show that CodeWiki achieves a 68.79% quality score with proprietary models, outperforming the closed-source DeepWiki baseline by 4.73%, with especially strong gains on scripting languages. CodeWiki is released as open source to support future research.

Abstract:
Self-evolving agents achieve personalization by accumulating user-specific memories over long horizons. This capability, however, introduces novel safety risks, as responses that are generally safe may become harmful in user-specific contexts. Such safety-relevant contexts often emerge implicitly and evolve over time during long-horizon conversations, rendering traditional context-independent safety evaluations insufficient. To address this, we formally define Implicit Personalized Safety and present PerMemSafe, the first benchmark for evaluating implicit personalized safety of self-evolving agents in long-horizon interactions. Empirical results reveal significant limitations of existing self-evolving agents, with even the strongest achieving only around 50% safety rate, highlighting systematic failures in reasoning about personalized safety risks. To mitigate this, we propose SentinelMem, an active risk-aware memory framework that explicitly models personalized risk inference and memory evolution. Experiments show that SentinelMem improves implicit personalized safety by 23.8% over prior memory frameworks while maintaining helpfulness in long-horizon interactions.

Abstract:
Dangerous speech detection is a well-studied task, but existing approaches typically treat utterances in isolation, relying on binary labels that ignore who is speaking and in what mental state. We formulate a context-dependent variant of this task by grounding it in Theory-of-Mind (ToM). In cognitive science, ToM studies how humans attribute latent mental states-such as emotions, intentions, and actions-to others. We argue that such states are key signals for assessing the risk of an utterance. Building on this view, we construct ToM-DS, a 79K-instance dataset where each utterance is paired with structured speaker profiles, ToM states (emotion, intent, action), and topic hierarchies. During data construction, we first identify context-dependent sentences and generate diverse safe and dangerous scenarios surrounding them. High-quality annotations are obtained with state-of-the-art LLMs and a multi-stage cross-agent validation pipeline, yielding a comprehensive and reliable resource for context-dependent dangerous speech detection and fine-grained risk level classification. We further propose ToMGuard, a lightweight model with a dynamic ToM attention mechanism that adaptively weighs different mental-state cues. ToMGuard outperforms strong proprietary and open-source LLMs with significantly fewer parameters. Experimental results show that ToMGuard sets a new benchmark for context-dependent dangerous speech detection and risk level classification on ToM-DS.

Abstract:
Knowledge distillation (KD) is a key technique for compressing large language models (LLMs), yet it faces challenges stemming from the teacher–student capacity gap. While existing KD methods address these challenges either by mixing teacher and student distributions in the distillation target or by using curriculum learning to sequence training from easy to hard examples, they typically design these two strategies independently, missing the opportunity for synergistic co-design. To bridge this gap, we propose Calibrated Progressive Distillation (CPD), a white-box KD framework that co-designs curriculum scheduling and target mixing through a unified difficulty-aware principle. CPD uses a difficulty profile to select epoch-specific subsets that ensure a uniform increase in average difficulty, adapting to the dataset’s intrinsic hardness structure. Simultaneously, the mixing coefficient in the distillation target and the distillation temperature are synchronized with this progression, gradually shifting supervision from teacher-dominated to student-informed signals as training advances. Theoretically, CPD ensures bounded gradients and induces an implicit attention shift from easy to hard samples. Empirically, CPD consistently outperforms advanced KD methods across diverse tasks, while reducing training runtime by over 10%. Our work demonstrates that aligning data scheduling with distillation signal design is crucial for effective and efficient LLM distillation.

Abstract:
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether specific data was used to train a model. While existing MIAs against pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) typically require access to complete logits (probabilities), such access is sometimes unavailable in real-world deployments where only the generated text is exposed. Current label-only MIAs relied on surrogate models to estimate the target model’s token probabilities, but we identify fundamental limitations: high sensitivity to surrogate model selection and significant probability estimation errors. To address these challenges, we propose SEAD (Semantic-Aware Density), a novel surrogate-free label-only MIA approach that directly estimates token probabilities through Monte Carlo sampling of the target model itself. This approach eliminates dependency on surrogate models while reducing probability estimation errors by an order of magnitude. Furthermore, we introduce a semantic-aware density approach that enhances attack effectiveness by considering both exact token matches and semantically similar alternatives, inspired by the understanding that LLMs may express memorized information through different but semantically equivalent tokens. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that SEAD consistently outperforms existing label-only attacks and serves as a foundational density estimator in the label-only setting.

Abstract:
State-of-the-art code generation frameworks rely on mental simulation, where LLMs internally trace execution to verify correctness. We expose a fundamental limitation: the Mental-Reality Gap—where models hallucinate execution traces and confidently validate buggy code. This gap manifests along two orthogonal dimensions: the Specification Gap (overlooking edge cases during planning) and the Verification Gap (hallucinating correct behavior for flawed code). We propose SolidCoder with a simple principle: don’t imagine—execute. The S.O.L.I.D. architecture addresses both dimensions by forcing edge-case awareness before algorithm design and replacing imagined traces with sandboxed execution using property-based oracles. With GPT-4o, SolidCoder achieves state-of-the-art pass@1 performance: 95.7% on HumanEval (+0.6%p), 77.0% on CodeContests (+4.3%p), and 26.7% on APPS (+3.4%p). Ablation reveals that edge-case awareness provides the largest individual gain, while execution grounding catches categorically different errors that specification improvements cannot address. These gains generalize to RL post-trained models, validating that bridging both gap dimensions is essential for robust code synthesis. We release our code and framework to facilitate future research.

Abstract:
People commonly leverage structured content to accelerate knowledge acquisition and research problem solving. Among these, roadmaps guide researchers through hierarchical subtasks to solve complex research problems step by step. Despite progress in structured content generation, the roadmap generation task has remained unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce RoadMap, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to construct high-quality roadmaps for solving complex research problems. Based on this, we identify three limitations of LLMs: (1) lack of professional knowledge, (2) unreasonable task decomposition, and (3) disordered logical relationships. To address these challenges, we propose RoadMapper, an LLM-based multi-agent system that decomposes the research roadmap generation task into three key stages (i.e., initial generation, knowledge augmentation, and iterative "critique-revise-evaluate"). Extensive experiments demonstrate that RoadMapper can improve LLMs’ ability for roadmap generation, while enhancing average performance by more than 8% and saving 84% of the time required by human experts, highlighting its effectiveness and application potential.

Abstract:
Effective Automated Essay Scoring (AES) are expected to support both reliable assessment and actionable instructional feedback. However, existing approaches often treat scoring and feedback as separate components: neural scoring models provide limited interpretability, while Large Language Model (LLM)-based feedback is typically insensitive to learners’ proficiency levels. To address this fragmentation, this work proposes PsyScore , a psychometrically-aware framework that integrates diagnostic assessment with instructional scaffolding through a shared latent ability representation. PsyScore comprises three key modules: a Trait-Adaptive Neural IRT Scorer that incorporates the Graded Partial Credit Model (GPCM) into a neural architecture, enabling the precise estimation of student ability while maintaining psychometric interpretability, a ZPD-Scaffolded Feedback Generator , which conditions multi-agent feedback strategies on the diagnosed ability parameter to adapt instructional focus across different proficiency levels, and a Multi-Perspective Feedback Evaluation Strategy that assesses feedback quality via pairwise preference judgments and student revision simulations. Experiments on the ASAP++ dataset demonstrate that PsyScore achieves competitive scoring performance while providing more pedagogically aligned feedback.

Abstract:
Financial management is high-stakes, where small errors can propagate into reporting deviations and costly downstream decisions, yet real-world workflows remain labor-intensive and fragmented, and existing automation supports only isolated steps rather than complete workflows. Large language models (LLMs) show promise in automating financial workflows, but current benchmarks lack domain-specific data, realistic workflow-level task design, and standardized workflow-level evaluation. To address these gaps, we present FinMaster, a benchmark for evaluating large language models on full financial management workflows spanning financial literacy, accounting, auditing, and consulting. FinMaster comprises three modules: FinSim generates synthetic datasets compliant with real-world accounting standards for diverse company types, enabling realistic evaluation without relying on proprietary financial records. FinSuite offers 183 tasks across core financial domains. FinEval provides a unified evaluation framework. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art models including GPT-4o-mini, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and DeepSeek-V3 reveal critical capability gaps in financial reasoning, with accuracy dropping from over 90% on basic tasks to 40% on complex scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning. This degradation reflects error propagation, where accuracy reaches 58% for single-metric calculations but decreases to 37% in multi-metric settings. FinMaster provides scalable and reproducible benchmarking for realistic end-to-end financial workflows, helping advance reliable deployment of LLMs in financial practice.

Abstract:
The recent development of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has significantly advanced AI’s ability to understand visual modalities. However, existing evaluation benchmarks remain limited to single-turn question answering, overlooking the complexity of multi-turn dialogues in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce MT-Video-Bench , a holistic video understanding benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in multi-turn dialogues. Specifically, our MT-Video-Bench mainly assesses six core competencies that focus on perceptivity and interactivity, encompassing 1,000 meticulously curated multi-turn dialogues from diverse domains. These capabilities are rigorously aligned with real-world applications, such as interactive sports analysis and multi-turn video-based intelligent tutoring. With MT-Video-Bench, we extensively evaluate various state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source MLLMs, revealing their significant performance discrepancies and limitations in handling multi-turn video dialogues. The benchmark will be publicly available to foster future research.

Abstract:
Concept-based explanations quantify how high-level concepts (e.g., gender or experience) influence model behavior, which is crucial for decision-makers in high-stakes domains. Recent work evaluates the faithfulness of such explanations by comparing them to reference causal effects estimated from counterfactuals. In practice, existing benchmarks rely on costly human-written counterfactuals that serves as imperfect proxy. To address this, we introduce a framework for constructing datasets containing structural counterfactual pairs: LIBERTy (LLM-based Interventional Benchmark for Explainability with Reference Targets). LIBERTy is grounded in explicitly defined Structured Causal Models (SCMs) of the text generation, interventions on a concept propagate through the SCM until an LLM generates the counterfactual. We introduce three datasets (disease detection, CV screening, and workplace violence prediction) together with a new evaluation metric, order-faithfulness. Using them, we evaluate a wide range of methods across five models and identify substantial headroom for improving concept-based explanations. LIBERTy also enables systematic analysis of model sensitivity to interventions: we find that proprietary LLMs show markedly reduced sensitivity to demographic concepts, likely due to post-training mitigation. Overall, LIBERTy provides a much-needed benchmark for developing faithful explainability methods.

Abstract:
AI systems are fallible, and humans can make mistakes in deciding whether to trustAI over their own judgment. Thus, improving human-AI collaboration requires that we understand when,why, and how humans decide to rely on AI. We study two reliance decisions: delegating a task toAI without seeing its output (whether AI is used) and evaluating AI suggestions to decidewhether to adopt them how AI output shapes final decisions).Both matter for effective collaboration, yet prior work lacks naturalistic experiments capturing both patternsfor the same users. We address this gap by studying collaborative human–AI teams competing in aquestion-answering game in which humans can choose when and how to work with AI agents to win.Our 24 matches pair 23 expert humans with 16 AI agents, capturing 387 delegation and 1440 adoption decisions.While human–AI collaboration performs better than either AI or humansalone, humans make suboptimal collaboration decisions, bothunder-relying on correct AI suggestions (3.7% of opportunities missed) and over-relying when AI misleads them (1.5%).Both parties contribute wrong answers: reported model confidence is near chance when humans and AI disagree, while confirmation bias drives higher under-reliance (60.7%) when an AI suggestion agrees with humans’ initial incorrect answer.

Abstract:
Financial report generation is a complex task that requires gathering and reasoning over multi-source information. Recent advances in Large Language Models have made them a promising solution for automating this process. However, the reasoning paths in traditional Chain-of-Thought paradigms are inherently constrained by predefined, static computational topologies, rendering them ill-equipped to handle the dynamic uncertainties of real-world financial environments. To tackle this challenge, we propose Cogito, a cognitively grounded agentic framework for professional financial report generation. At its core, Cogito is driven by Dynamic Graph of Thoughts, a novel reasoning mechanism that models the agent’s reasoning process as an evolving topology for adaptive exploration.We further introduce a Social Collaboration Mechanism to facilitate coordinated agent interaction. Finally, Cogito is instantiated as a multi-agent system, where four specialized agents collaboratively execute the end-to-end report generation task. Extensive experiments on enterprise- and industry-level financial report generation benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of Cogito in data quality, analytical validity, and presentation quality.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are commonly trained on multilingual corpora that include Greek, yet reliable evaluation benchmarks for Greek—particularly those based on authentic, native-sourced content—remain limited. Existing datasets are often machine-translated from English, failing to capture Greek linguistic and cultural characteristics. We introduce GreekMMLU, a native-sourced benchmark for massive multitask language understanding in Greek, comprising 21,805 multiple-choice questions across 45 subject areas, organized under a newly defined subject taxonomy and annotated with educational difficulty levels spanning primary to professional examinations. All questions are sourced or authored in Greek from academic, professional, and governmental exams. We publicly release 16,857 samples and reserve 4,948 samples for a private leaderboard to enable robust and contamination-resistant evaluation. Evaluations of over 80 open- and closed-source LLMs reveal substantial performance gaps between frontier and open-weight models, as well as between Greek-adapted models and general multilingual ones. Finally, we provide a systematic analysis of factors influencing performance—including model scale, adaptation, and prompting—and derive insights for improving LLM capabilities in Greek.

Abstract:
Zero-shot text-to-speech models can clone a speaker’s timbre from a short reference audio, but they also strongly inherit the speaking style present in the reference. As a result, synthesizing speech with a desired style often requires carefully selecting reference audio, which is impractical when only limited or mismatched references are available. While recent controllable TTS methods attempt to address this issue, they typically rely on absolute style targets and discrete textual prompts, and therefore do not support continuous and reference-relative style control. We propose ReStyle-TTS, a framework that enables continuous and reference-relative style control in zero-shot TTS. Our key insight is that effective style control requires first reducing the model’s implicit dependence on reference style before introducing explicit control mechanisms. To this end, we introduce Decoupled Classifier-Free Guidance (DCFG), which independently controls text and reference guidance, reducing reliance on reference style while preserving text fidelity. On top of this, we apply style-specific LoRAs together with Orthogonal LoRA Fusion to enable continuous and disentangled multi-attribute control, and introduce a Timbre Consistency Optimization module to mitigate timbre drift caused by weakened reference guidance. Experiments show that ReStyle-TTS enables user-friendly, continuous, and relative control over pitch, energy, and multiple emotions while maintaining intelligibility and speaker timbre, and performs robustly in challenging mismatched reference–target style scenarios. Code and data are available in supplementary materials.

Abstract:
Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) has emerged as a vital approach to demystify the opaque decision-making of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing reviews primarily treat MI as an observational science, summarizing analytical insights while lacking a systematic framework for actionable intervention. To bridge this gap, we present a practical survey structured around the pipeline: "Locate, Steer, and Improve." We formally categorize Localizing (diagnosis) and Steering (intervention) methods based on specific Interpretable Objects to establish a rigorous intervention protocol. Furthermore, we demonstrate how this framework enables tangible improvements in Alignment, Capability, and Efficiency, effectively operationalizing MI as a practical engineering toolkit for model optimization. The curated paper list of this work is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Act-MI-F068.

Abstract:
Many real-world questions appear deceptively simple yet implicitly demand two capabilities: (i) systematic coverage of a bounded knowledge universe and (ii) compositional set-based reasoning over that universe, a phenomenon we term “the tip of the iceberg.” We formalize this challenge through two orthogonal dimensions: knowledge width, the cardinality of the required universe, and reasoning depth, the number of compositional set operations. We introduce KnowledgeBerg, a benchmark of 4,800 multiple-choice questions derived from 1,183 enumeration seeds spanning 10 domains and 17 languages, with universes grounded in authoritative sources to ensure reproducibility. Representative open-source LLMs demonstrate severe limitations, achieving only 5.26–36.88 F1 on universe enumeration and 16.00–44.19 accuracy on knowledge-grounded reasoning. Diagnostic analyses reveal three stages of failure: completeness, or missing knowledge; awareness, or failure to identify requirements; and application, or incorrect reasoning execution. This pattern persists across languages and model scales. Although test-time compute and retrieval augmentation yield measurable gains—up to 4.35 and 3.78 points, respectively—substantial gaps remain, exposing limitations in how current LLMs organize structured knowledge and execute compositional reasoning over bounded domains. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/2npc/KnowledgeBerg

Abstract:
This study investigates whether the grammatical constraints on wanna contraction—a phenomenon traditionally cited as evidence for innate linguistic knowledge—can be learned via BabyLMs, which are designed to reflect cognitively plausible learning conditions. Two datasets were constructed from the CHILDES corpus, varying in embedded verb frequency (high vs. low) and grammaticality, and contrasting grammatical instances (object extraction contexts) with ungrammatical ones (subject extraction contexts) of wanna contractions. Using surprisal as a metric, we evaluated 24 BabyLMs from the 2024 BabyLM Challenge alongside four standard models, including BERT and GPT-2. While the standard models performed with near-perfect consistency, the BabyLMs showed modest but meaningful sensitivity, particularly those trained on larger datasets and tested on high-frequency wanna instances. In particular, only encoder-based BabyLMs captured the grammatical constraint, with babylm24_MLSM exhibiting consistent performance. Nonetheless, our findings provide evidence for limited and conditional learnability of wanna contraction by artificial learners under cognitively realistic input conditions.

Abstract:
Temporal knowledge graph forecasting(TKGF) asks a model to rank the mostplausible future entity for a query such as(s, r, ?, t) from historical events. Recenttraining-free methods use large languagemodels (LLMs) for this task, but their accuracydepends heavily on which past events areshown in the prompt under a tight contextbudget. We present LANTERN, a training-freeprompting framework that addresses thisbottleneck by combining two complementaryviews of history: a long-window strengthscore for stable interaction patterns anda short-window novelty score for suddenchanges. LANTERN first filters unhelpfulevents, then selects a compact evidence setwith Pareto-greedy selection, and finally addsone structure-aware analogical demonstration.Across ICEWS14, ICEWS05-15, ICEWS18,and GDELT, LANTERN consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art training-free baselineAnRe under the same backbone and 2-hopcandidate protocol, improving Hits@1 by upto 2.5 points and MRR by up to 1.2 points.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation reduces hallucination by grounding model outputs in external evidence, yet hallucinations can still occur even when the retrieved context is accurate and sufficient. From the perspective of information routing in the residual stream, this reflects an imbalance where internal parametric knowledge overwhelms external context during generation. We present an attention-centric analysis of RAG hallucination under valid evidence, showing that hallucinated and factual tokens diverge in mid-to-late Transformer layers as context-selective attention routing weakens, allowing parametric influence to dominate the residual stream. Motivated by prior studies showing that some attention heads—often referred to as copying heads—exhibit stronger information transport capacity, we aim to extend similar evidence-carrying behavior to a broader set of attention heads. To this end, we introduce CoDA, a lightweight inference-time attention intervention that amplifies evidence-aligned value states, enabling more attention heads to transport reliable external evidence in a copy-encouraged manner. Experiments demonstrate that CoDA improves contextual faithfulness, reduces hallucination, and remains robust under long and noisy contexts with modest and stable inference overhead.

Abstract:
Opinion dynamics (OD) studies how individual opinions evolve and generate collective patterns such as consensus and polarization. While recent work explores OD using populations of LLM-based agents focusing on opinion exchange, it typically does not incorporate individuals’ lived experiences, such as economic outcomes of past decisions, which play a critical role in shaping opinions. We propose a novel OD simulation framework that grounds LLM-based agents in an economic environment, allowing them to act and receive environmental feedback. Our simulations exhibit coherent OD at both individual and population levels: individual opinions follow structured trajectories shaped by economic experiences, with adverse conditions inducing opinion rigidity, while at the population level, collective opinions co-move with economic conditions, with inequality amplifying polarization and price instability driving larger distributional shifts. These results highlight the importance of grounding LLM-based agents in environments to capture collective OD.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit non-stationary generation: their output distributions shift with prompts, retrieved documents, and decoding conditions. Under such variability, average likelihood metrics can obscure heterogeneous behaviors across samples, especially in high-surprisal tails where failures often occur. We propose an information-spectrum-based diagnostic framework that treats LLMs as general sources without assuming stationarity, ergodicity, or the asymptotic equipartition property. We define sequence-level self-information density (coding rate; mean surprisal) and construct an empirical information spectrum from finite samples, enabling operational estimates of spectrum quantiles and width. We further introduce an information gain spectrum, a teacher-forced likelihood-based measure that evaluates the same generated sequence with and without side information. Across multiple Japanese LLMs and QA settings, we observe that correctness differences are often more visible in the high-surprisal tail than in the mean coding rate, and that side information can reshape tail behavior in heterogeneous ways across sequences. We also observe that instruction tuning changes the spectrum structure, making tail statistics and spectrum width more predictive of correctness than the mean coding rate. Overall, our analysis illustrates how spectrum-based diagnostics complement average-based metrics for understanding conditional generation.

Abstract:
Clinical named entity recognition (NER) remains difficult to scale due to the high cost of manual annotation. Although large language models (LLMs) enable zero-shot annotation, their performance on clinical NER is still limited. To this end, we improve the annotation quality by aggregating annotations from a herd of diverse LLMs, including general-purpose, medically adapted, and NER-specialized models. A key challenge in this multi-LLM setting is effectively leveraging entities extracted by only a minority of models: although they account for a substantial portion of true positives, they are heavily intermixed with noise. To address this, we introduce MARY, a label-modeling method for Multi-LLM Annotation using Representation learning to capture contextual similaritY. During aggregation, MARY selectively incorporates minority-extracted entities whose contexts are similar to those of majority-extracted entities, yielding more reliable and comprehensive annotations. Experimental results show that MARY improves the average F1 score by 8.6% over vanilla zero-shot baselines while reducing annotation costs.

Abstract:
A common strategy in transfer learning is few shot fine-tuning, but its success is highly dependent on the quality of samples selected as training examples. Active learning methods such as uncertainty sampling and diversity sampling can select useful samples. However, under extremely low-resource and class-imbalanced conditions, they often favor outliers rather than truly informative samples, resulting in degraded performance. In this paper, we introduce RADS (Reinforcement Domain Adaptive Sampling), a robust sample selection strategy using reinforcement learning (RL) to identify the most informative samples. Experimental evaluations on several real world clinical datasets show our sample selection strategy enhances model transferability while maintaining robust performance under extreme class imbalance compared to traditional methods. Our code is open-sourced on GitHub.

Abstract:
Long-context capabilities are essential for a wide range of applications, including document and video understanding, in-context learning, and inference-time scaling, all of which require models to process and reason over long sequences of text and multimodal data. In this work, we introduce an efficient training recipe for building ultra-long context LLMs from aligned instruct model, pushing the boundaries of context lengths from 128K to 1M, 2M, and 4M tokens. Our approach leverages continued pretraining strategies to extend the context window, while employing efficient instruction tuning to maintain short context capabilities. Our UltraLong-8B, built on Llama-3.1-Instruct, achieves state-of-the-art performance across a diverse set of long-context benchmarks. Importantly, UltraLong-8B also maintains competitive performance on standard benchmarks, showing balanced improvements for both long and short context tasks. We provide an in-depth analysis of key design choices, highlighting the impacts of scaling strategies and data composition. Our findings establish a robust framework for efficiently scaling context lengths while preserving general model capabilities. We released all model weights for open research.

Abstract:
Vision agent memory has shown remarkable effectiveness in long-video understanding; however, storing such memory for videos incurs substantial overhead, leading to high costs in both storage and computation. To address this issue, we propose StreamMeCo, an efficient Stream Agent Memory Compression framework. Specifically, based on the connectivity of the memory graph, StreamMeCo introduces edge-free minmax sampling for isolated nodes and edge-aware weight pruning for connected nodes, evicting redundant memory nodes while maintaining accuracy. In addition, we introduce a time-decay memory retrieval mechanism to mitigate the performance degradation caused by memory compression. Extensive experiments on three challenging benchmark datasets (M3-Bench-robot, M3-Bench-web, and Video-MME-Long) demonstrate that under 70% memory graph compression, StreamMeCo achieves a 1.87× speedup in memory retrieval while delivering an average accuracy improvement of 1.0%. Our code is available at https://github.com/Celina-love-sweet/StreamMeCo.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities, they unintentionally memorize sensitive data, posing critical privacy and security risks.Machine unlearning is pivotal for mitigating these risks, yet existing paradigms face a fundamental dilemma: aggressive unlearning often induces catastrophic forgetting that degrades model utility, whereas conservative strategies risk superficial forgetting, leaving models vulnerable to adversarial recovery. To address this trade-off, we propose AGT AO (Adversarial Gating Training with Adaptive Orthogonality), a unified framework designed to reconcile robust erasure with utility preservation. Specifically, our approach introduces Adaptive Orthogonality (AO) to dynamically mitigate geometric gradient conflicts between forgetting and retention objectives, thereby minimizing unintended knowledge degradation. Concurrently, Adversarial Gating Training (AGT) formulates unlearning as a latent-space min-max game, employing a curriculum-based gating mechanism to simulate and counter internal recovery attempts. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AGT AO achieves a superior trade-off between unlearning efficacy (KUR ≈ 0.01) and model utility (MMLU 58.30).[Code is available at .].

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in handling long context inputs, but this comes at the cost of increased computational resources and latency. Our research introduces a novel approach for the long context bottleneck to accelerate LLM inference and reduce GPU memory consumption. We show that LLMs can identify relevant tokens in the early layers prior to generating query responses. Leveraging this insight, we propose an algorithm that uses early layers of an LLM as filters to select and compress input tokens, significantly reducing the context length for subsequent processing. Our method, GemFilter, demonstrates substantial improvements in both speed and memory efficiency compared to existing techniques, such as standard attention and SnapKV/H2O. Notably, it achieves a 2.4X speedup and 30% reduction in GPU memory usage compared to SOTA methods. When evaluated on the Needle in a Haystack task, GemFilter significantly outperforms standard attention and SnapKV, while demonstrating comparable performance on the LongBench challenge. GemFilter is simple, training-free, and broadly applicable across different LLMs. Moreover, it provides interpretability by allowing humans to inspect the selected input sequence. Our findings provide practical benefits for deploying LLMs and deepen our understanding of their internal mechanisms, paving the way for further optimizations in LLM design and inference. Our code is available at https://github.com/SalesforceAIResearch/GemFilter.

Abstract:
Post-training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning, specifically Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing mathematical reasoning. However, standard GRPO relies on scalar correctness rewards that are often non-injective with respect to semantic content: distinct reasoning paths receive identical rewards. This leads to a Diversity-Quality Inconsistency, where the policy collapses into a narrow set of dominant modes while ignoring equally valid but structurally novel strategies.To bridge this gap, we propose Diversity-aware Reward Adjustment (DRA), a theoretically grounded framework that calibrates the reward signal using the semantic density of sampled groups. By leveraging Submodular Mutual Information (SMI), DRA implements an Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS) mechanism that effectively de-biases the gradient estimation. This creates a repulsive force against redundancy, driving the policy to achieve better coverage of the high-reward landscape.Our method is plug-and-play and integrates seamlessly with GRPO variants. Empirical evaluations on five math benchmarks demonstrate that DRA-GRPO consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving an average accuracy of 58.2% on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B with only 7,000 training samples and 55 cost, highlighting the critical role of diversity calibration in data-efficient alignment.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning, yet current methods face key challenges in resource allocation and policy optimization dynamics: (i) uniform rollout allocation ignores gradient variance heterogeneity across problems, and (ii) the softmax policy structure causes gradient attenuation for high-confidence correct actions, while excessive gradient updates may destabilize training. Therefore, we propose DynaMO, a theoretically-grounded dual-pronged optimization framework. At the sequence level, we prove that uniform allocation is suboptimal and derive variance-minimizing allocation from the first principle, establishing Bernoulli variance as a computable proxy for gradient informativeness. At the token level, we develop gradient-aware advantage modulation grounded in theoretical analysis of gradient magnitude bounds. Our framework compensates for gradient attenuation of high-confidence correct actions while utilizing entropy changes as computable indicators to stabilize excessive update magnitudes. Extensive experiments conducted on a diverse range of mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over strong RLVR baselines. Our implementation is available at: [https://github.com/GithubX-F/DynaMO-RL](https://github.com/FlyTune/DynaMO-RL).

Abstract:
While GUI agents have shown impressive capabilities in common computer-use tasks such as OSWorld, current benchmarks mainly focus on isolated and single-application tasks. This overlooks a critical real-world requirement of coordinating across multiple applications to accomplish complex profession-specific workflows. To bridge this gap, we present a computer-use benchmark in cross-application workflows, named WindowsWorld, designed to systematically assess GUI Agents on complex multi-step tasks that mirror real-world professional activities. Our methodology uses a multi-agent framework steered by 16 occupations to generate four difficulty-level tasks with intermediate inspection, which are then refined by human review and executed in a simulated environment. The resulting benchmark contains 181 tasks with an average of 5.0 sub-goals across 17 common desktop applications, of which 78% are inherently multi-application. Experimental results of leading large models and agents show that: 1) All computer-use agents perform poorly on multi-application tasks (< 21% success rate), far below the performance of simple single-app tasks; 2) They largely fail at tasks requiring conditional judgment and reasoning across ≥ 3 applications, stalling at early sub-goals; 3) Low execution efficiency, where tasks often fail despite far exceeding human step limits. Code, benchmark data, and evaluation resources are available at github.com/HITsz-TMG/WindowsWorld.

Abstract:
Product attribute extraction in e-commerce is bottlenecked by ontologies that are inconsistent, incomplete, and costly to maintain. We present AutoPKG, a multi-agent Large Language Model (LLM) framework that automatically constructs a Product-attribute Knowledge Graph (PKG) from multimodal product content. AutoPKG induces product types and type-specific attribute keys on demand, extracts attribute values from text and images, and consolidates updates through a centralized decision agent that maintains a globally consistent canonical graph. We also propose an evaluation protocol for dynamic PKGs that measures type/key validity and consolidation quality, as well as edge-level accuracy for value assertions after canonicalization. On a large real-world marketplace catalog dataset from Lazada (Alibaba), AutoPKG achieves up to 0.953 Weighted Knowledge Efficiency (WKE) for product types, 0.724 WKE for attribute keys, and 0.531 edge-level F1 for multimodal value extraction. Across three public benchmarks, we improve edge-level exact-match F1 by 0.152 and yield a 0.208 precision gain on the attribute extraction application. Online A/B tests show that AutoPKG-derived attributes increase Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) in Badge (+3.81%), Search (+5.32%), and Recommendation (+7.89%), supporting AutoPKG’s practical value in production.

Abstract:
While LLM-based agents have emerged as a focal point for automating data science tasks, they continue to grapple with inefficient context management, "silent failures" (where code executes correctly but fails the task objectives), and error propagation inherent in sequential generation. In this paper, we propose Tree-Notebook, an agentic framework designed to mimic the iterative cognitive process of human data scientists. At its core, Tree-Notebook conceptualizes Jupyter Notebook cells as nodes within a tree structure, facilitating organized and efficient context retrieval. We formalize the task-solving process as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) over a dynamic tree, utilizing an entropy-based information gain function for path evaluation to enhance adaptability in real-world environments. Furthermore, we introduce the "Data Shadow" system, which resolves silent failures by performing real-time tracking of data distributions, provenance, and semantic constraints. Experimental results demonstrate that Tree-Notebook achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on both InfiAgent-DABench and DSBench. To further evaluate robustness, we introduce an augmented version of InfiAgent-DABench to simulate complex environments, where Tree-Notebook consistently maintains its SOTA standing. Code is available at: https://github.com/QJK-BUAA/Tree-Notebook

Abstract:
The assessment of jailbreak attacks against large language models currently suffers from inconsistent evaluation criteria and methods, leading to unreliable estimates of attack success rates. We propose JailMeter, an evidence-based evaluation framework designed to more faithfully measure jailbreak effectiveness. Inspired by the Information Bottleneck theory, JailMeter applies dual-feedback optimization to filter jailbreak noise from model responses while preserving content relevant to the original malicious question. This process produces concise evidence for a rigorous assessment under which an attack is validated only when the response captures the malicious intent and delivers a complete answer, thereby signaling a substantive bypass of model safety alignment. We evaluate JailMeter on JailMeter-Eva, a challenging benchmark containing 330 human-labeled, non-rejected jailbreak instances. JailMeter achieves an accuracy of 97.27%, substantially outperforming existing evaluation methods. To support large-scale evaluation, we further distill JailMeter into a small language model, JailMeter SLM , which maintains comparable reliability with significantly reduced computational costs. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Magi2B0y/JailMeter .

Abstract:
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) are advancing rapidly, with new models frequently claiming support for an increasing number of languages. However, existing evaluation datasets are limited and lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. To address this, we introduce MuBench, a benchmark covering 61 languages with 3.9M samples and evaluating a broad range of capabilities. We evaluate several state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs and find notable gaps between claimed and actual language coverage, particularly a persistent performance disparity between English and low-resource languages. Leveraging MuBench’s alignment, we propose Multilingual Consistency (MLC) as a complementary metric to accuracy for analyzing performance bottlenecks and guiding model improvement. MuBench provides flexible evaluation formats, including mixed-language testing. Experimental results show that increasing model size does not improve its ability to handle mixed-language contexts. We recruited human experts to evaluate translation quality and cultural sensitivity for 34k samples across 17 languages, and combined these assessments with an LLM-as-a-Judge approach to ensure overall data quality in low resource languages.

Abstract:
Agentic repository-level code understanding is essential for automating complex software engineering tasks, yet the field lacks reliable benchmarks. Existing evaluations often overlook the long tail topics and rely on popular repositories where Large Language Models (LLMs) can cheat via memorized knowledge. To address this, we introduce SWE-QA-Pro, a benchmark constructed from diverse, long-tail repositories with executable environments. We enforce topical balance via issue-driven clustering to cover under-represented task types and apply a rigorous difficulty calibration process: questions solvable by direct-answer baselines are filtered out. This results in a dataset where agentic workflows significantly outperform direct answering (e.g., a ~13-point gap for Claude Sonnet 4.5), confirming the necessity of agentic codebase exploration. Furthermore, to tackle the scarcity of training data for such complex behaviors, we propose a scalable synthetic data pipeline that powers a two-stage training recipe: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF). This approach allows small open models to learn efficient tool usage and reasoning. Empirically, a Qwen3-8B model trained with our recipe surpasses GPT-4o by 2.3 points on SWE-QA-Pro and substantially narrows the gap to state-of-the-art proprietary models, demonstrating both the validity of our evaluation and the effectiveness of our agentic training workflow.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines are often bottlenecked by rollout generation, making end-to-end training slow. Recent work mitigates this by running rollouts with quantization to accelerate decoding, which is the most expensive stage of the RL loop. However, these setups destabilize optimization by amplifying the training–-inference gap: rollouts are operated at low precision, while learning updates are computed at full precision. To address this challenge, we propose QaRL (Rollout Alignment Quantization-Aware RL), which aligns training-side forward with the quantized rollout to minimize mismatch. We further identify a failure mode in quantized rollouts: long-form responses tend to produce repetitive, garbled tokens (error tokens). To mitigate these problems, we introduce TBPO (Trust-Band Policy Optimization), a sequence-level objective with dual clipping for negative samples, aimed to keep updates within the trust region. On Qwen3-30B-A3B MoE for math problems, QaRL outperforms quantized-rollout training by +5.5 while improving stability and preserving low-bit throughput benefits.

Abstract:
If large language models (LLMs) are deployed to analyze evidence and evaluate suspects in criminal investigations, are they free from the very trap that has led countless human investigators to misjudgment—implicit bias swayed by information irrelevant to the essence of the case? To answer this question, this study systematically injected personas (gender, race, relationship) into neutralized murder mystery scenarios and examined the reasoning stability of LLMs. Experimental results revealed that implicit bias propagation was observed across all models. The phenomenon where models outwardly state “that information is irrelevant to the judgment” while their actual conclusions are already influenced by the injected persona was universally observed. Interestingly, model scale alone did not guarantee stability: while the largest model achieved the lowest instability, several smaller models outperformed much larger ones. The most notable finding concerns the differential vulnerability across persona types: while race and gender were processed relatively stably, relationship information—particularly hostile relationships—induced significantly higher reasoning contamination. More concerning is the fact that even when conclusions were correctly maintained, the reasoning process itself was extensively contaminated. These findings suggest that current alignment techniques have created a blind spot by focusing on identity-based bias while neglecting relationship-based bias, and propose that stability evaluation should encompass not only outputs but also reasoning processes.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often respond even when prompts omit critical details or include misleading information, leading to hallucinations or reinforced misconceptions. We study how to evaluate and improve LLMs’ ability to decide when and what to ask for clarification without sacrificing task performance. We introduce AskBench, an interactive benchmark that converts standard QA pairs into multi-turn interactions with explicit checkpoints. A unified judge loop evaluates final answers and simulates user responses as needed. AskBench covers two settings: AskMind, with intent-deficient queries requiring clarification, and AskOverconfidence, with queries containing false premises that must be identified and corrected. We further propose rubric-guided reinforcement learning with verifier-based rewards (RLVR), which uses structured rubrics to encourage targeted clarification. Experiments show consistent improvements in accuracy, rubric adherence, and interaction efficiency, with strong generalization to unseen domains.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training reasoning-oriented models by leveraging rule-based reward signals. However, RL training typically tends to improve single-sample success rates (i.e., Pass@1) while offering limited exploration of diverse reasoning trajectories, which is crucial for multi-sample performance (i.e., Pass@k). Our preliminary analysis reveals that this limitation stems from a fundamental squeezing effect , whereby probability mass is excessively concentrated on a narrow subset of high-reward trajectories, restricting genuine exploration and constraining attainable performance under RL training. To address this issue, in this work, we propose S teering P robability S queezing (SPS), a training paradigm that interleaves conventional RL with inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). SPS treats on-policy rollouts as demonstrations and employs IRL to explicitly reshape the induced trajectory distribution, thereby enhancing exploration without introducing external supervision. Experiments on five commonly used reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SPS can enable better exploration and improve Pass@k. Beyond algorithmic contributions, we provide an analysis of RL learning dynamics and identify an empirical upper bound on Pass@k, shedding light on intrinsic exploration limits in RL-based reasoning models. Our findings suggest that alternating between RL and IRL offers an effective pathway toward extending the exploration capacity of reasoning-oriented large language models.

Abstract:
Self-conditioning has been central to the success of continuous diffusion language models, as it allows models to correct previous errors. Yet its ability degrades precisely in the regime where diffusion is most attractive for deployment: few-step sampling for fast inference. In this study, we show that when models only have a few denoising steps, inaccurate self-conditioning induces a substantial approximation gap; this mistake compounds across denoising steps and ultimately dominate the sample quality. To address this, we propose a novel training framework that handles these errors during learning by perturbing the self-conditioning signal to match inference noise, improving robustness to prior estimation errors. In addition, we introduce a token-level noise-awareness mechanism that prevents training from saturation, hence improving optimization. Extensive experiments across conditional generation benchmarks demonstrate that our framework surpasses standard continuous diffusion models while providing up to 400x faster inference speed, and remains competitive against other one-step diffusion frameworks.

Abstract:
Automated environment configuration is a critical bottleneck in scaling software engineering (SWE) automation. To provide a reliable evaluation standard for this task, we present Multi-Docker-Eval benchmark. It includes 40 real-world repositories spanning 9 programming languages and measures both success in achieving executable states and efficiency under realistic constraints. Our extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs and agent frameworks reveals key insights: (1) the overall success rate of current models is low (F2P at most 37.7%), with environment construction being the primary bottleneck; (2) model size and reasoning length are not decisive factors, and open-source models like DeepSeek-V3.1 and Kimi-K2 are competitive in both efficiency and effectiveness; (3) agent framework and programming language also have significantly influence on success rate. These findings provide actionable guidelines for building scalable, fully automated SWE pipelines.

Abstract:
While Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is the prevailing method for equipping Large Language Models (LLMs) with function calling capabilities, its effectiveness is often compromised by two critical challenges: 1) Imbalanced Training Signals, where lengthy Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning tokens dominate the training signals over concise function calls in the learning objective, and 2) Imbalanced Data Hardness, characterized by a scarcity of hard training examples. To overcome these limitations, we propose Balanced Supervised Fine-tuning (BalanceSFT), a novel framework that incorporates two key components: a Self-adjusted Signal Balancing (SSB) loss that employs a learnable hyperparameter to dynamically adjust the token contributions of CoT reasoning and function calls, together with a Hard Data Re-sampling (HDR) strategy that establishes a feedback loop to selectively generate new, high-quality complex data guided by model errors. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed BalanceSFT framework. With BalanceSFT, a 7B model achieves function calling performance that surpasses state-of-the-art models like GPT-5. Our code, models, and dataset are open-sourced.

Abstract:
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly prevalent, their security vulnerabilities have already drawn attention.Machine unlearning is introduced to seek to mitigate these risks by removing the influence of undesirable data. However, existing methods not only rely on the retained dataset to preserve model utility, but also suffer from cumulative catastrophic utility loss under continuous unlearning requests.To solve this dilemma, we propose a novel method, called Rotation Control Unlearning (RCU), which leverages the rotational salience weight of RCU to quantify and control the unlearning degree in the continuous unlearning process.The skew symmetric loss is designed to construct the existence of the cognitive rotation space, where the changes of rotational angle can simulate the continuous unlearning process.Furthermore, we design an orthogonal rotation axes regularization to enforce mutually perpendicular rotation directions for continuous unlearning requests, effectively minimizing interference and addressing cumulative catastrophic utility loss.Experiments on multiple datasets confirm that our continuous unlearning method without retained dataset achieves SOTA performance.

Abstract:
Legal general intelligence (GI) refers to artificial intelligence (AI) that encompasses legal understanding, reasoning, and decision-making, simulating the expertise of legal experts across domains. However, existing benchmarks are result-oriented and fail to systematically evaluate the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs), hindering the development of legal GI. To address this, we propose LexGenius, an expert-level Chinese legal benchmark for evaluating legal GI in LLMs. It follows a Dimension-Task-Ability framework, covering seven dimensions, eleven tasks, and twenty abilities. We use the recent legal cases and exam questions to create multiple-choice questions with a combination of manual and LLM reviews to reduce data leakage risks, ensuring accuracy and reliability through multiple rounds of checks. We evaluate 12 state-of-the-art LLMs using LexGenius and conduct an in-depth analysis. We find significant disparities across legal intelligence abilities for LLMs, with even the best LLMs lagging behind human legal professionals. We believe LexGenius can assess the legal intelligence abilities of LLMs and enhance legal GI development.Our project is available at https://github.com/QwenQKing/LexGenius.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled molecular reasoning for property prediction. However, toxicity arises from complex biological mechanisms beyond chemical structure, necessitating mechanistic reasoning for reliable prediction. Despite its importance, current benchmarks fail to systematically evaluate this capability. LLMs can generate fluent but biologically unfaithful explanations, making it difficult to assess whether predicted toxicities are grounded in valid mechanisms. To bridge this gap, we introduce ToxReason, a benchmark grounded in the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) that evaluates organ-level toxicity reasoning across multiple organs. ToxReason integrates experimental drug–target interaction evidence with toxicity labels, requiring models to infer both toxic outcomes and their underlying mechanisms from Molecular Initiating Event (MIE) to Adverse Outcome (AO). Using ToxReason, we evaluate toxicity prediction performance and reasoning quality across diverse LLMs. We find that strong predictive performance does not necessarily imply reliable reasoning. Furthermore, we show that reasoning-aware training improves mechanistic reasoning and, consequently, toxicity prediction performance. Together, these results underscore the necessity of integrating reasoning into both evaluation and training for trustworthy toxicity modeling.

Abstract:
Multi-modal Event Argument Extraction task (MEAE) aims to extract all arguments related to a specific event from multiple modalities and identify their corresponding roles. Existing methods focus on weakly alignment of uni-modal representations and generatively data augmentation techniques. However, these methods ignore the potential impact of event role information on MEAE. To address this problem, we propose a Cross-modal Variational Role Hypergraph Network via Semantic Enhancement (CVRH). Unlike previous approaches, CVRH centers on event role information and designs a variational role hyperedge via semantic enhancement, which constructs a role hypergraph for event arguments within multi-modal documents. It explicitly modeling the high-order role correlations among cross-modal arguments in a document. Furthermore, CVRH introduces a modal shared encoder based on differential transformer, which effectively learns shared semantic representations across modalities and enhances the independence of argument representations. On the M2E2 benchmark, experimental results show that CVRH achieves a 6.9% improvement in F1-score on the MEAE compared to current state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Automated Answer Grading (AAG) is a fundamental task in intelligent education, requiring accurate semantic understanding and reliable modeling of student deviations from reference answers. Despite recent progress, large language models (LLMs) remain insensitive to missing key concepts, exhibit unstable scoring scales, and lack structured scoring semantics in their representation space. To overcome these limitations, we propose a difference-aware AAG framework that integrates heuristic difference labeling with dual-contrastive learning. Semantic difference levels between student and reference answers are automatically inferred through similarity-based heuristics and injected into the model input as explicit prompts, enabling fine-grained perception of semantic deviations. In addition, an InfoNCE-based contrastive objective enforces representation consistency among samples with identical scores, while a hierarchical contrastive constraint guided by score gaps promotes structured separation across different scoring levels. Experiments on benchmark datasets, including SciEntsBank and Beetle, show that the proposed method consistently outperforms cross-entropy–based baselines in accuracy, weighted accuracy, and relevance metrics. Further analyses demonstrate improved robustness and generalization, even when applied to small-scale models. We have made all datasets and the corresponding code publiclyaccessible at: https://github.com/leibnizchen/DiffCL

Abstract:
Syntactic movement is a core concept in generative linguistics to account for word-order variation and long-distance dependencies, but its psychological and neurobiological status remains debated. Here, we test the neural reality of movement in English and Chinese by correlating brain activity during naturalistic listening with syntactic node counts, traces and word embeddings derived from X-bar style tree annotations. We find that deep structure significantly predicts neural responses in English but not in Chinese, providing partial support for movement-based accounts while revealing clear cross-linguistic differences.

Abstract:
The "reversal curse" refers to the phenomenon where large language models (LLMs) exhibit predominantly unidirectional behavior when processing logically bidirectional relationships. Prior work attributed this to autoregressive training—predicting the next token inherently favors left-to-right information flow over genuine bidirectional knowledge associations. However, we observe that Diffusion LLMs (DLLMs), despite being trained bidirectionally, also suffer from the reversal curse. To investigate the root causes, we conduct systematic experiments on DLLMs and identify three key reasons: 1) entity fragmentation during training, 2) data asymmetry, and 3) missing entity relations. Motivated by the analysis of these reasons, we propose Diffusion Entity-Relation Modeling (DiffER), which addresses the reversal curse through entity-aware training and balanced data construction. Specifically, DiffER introduces whole-entity masking, which mitigates entity fragmentation by predicting complete entities in a single step. DiffER further employs distribution-symmetric and relation-enhanced data construction strategies to alleviate data asymmetry and missing relations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DiffER effectively alleviates the reversal curse in Diffusion LLMs, offering new perspectives for future research. The code is available at https://github.com/CQU-MM-Intelligent-Lab/DiffER.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) rely on strong linguistic reasoning inherited from their base language models. However, multimodal instruction fine-tuning paradoxically degrades this text’s reasoning capability, undermining multimodal performance. To address this issue, we propose a training-free framework to mitigate this degradation. Through layer-wise vision token masking, we reveal a common three-stage pattern in multimodal large language models: early-modal separation, mid-modal alignment, and late-modal degradation. By analyzing the behavior of MLLMs at different stages, we propose a plateau-guided model merging method that selectively injects base language model parameters into MLLMs. Experimental results based on five MLLMs on nine benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Attention-based analysis further reveals that merging shifts attention from diffuse, scattered patterns to focused localization on task-relevant visual regions.Our repository is on https://github.com/wzj1718/PlaM .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) possess strong capabilities in language understanding and generation, as well as remarkable problem-solving abilities. In the educational domain, a representative application is to employ LLMs as learning assistants that answer students’ questions and support their learning processes. In such scenarios, it is crucial for the model to perceive a student’s cognitive level and provide explanations that are appropriate to that level. However, whether LLMs can effectively accomplish this task has not yet been thoroughly investigated. To address this gap, we introduce CogBench, an evaluation benchmark designed to assess the cognitive alignment capabilities of LLMs in educational QA. CogBench comprises 2.1K mathematics questions, each associated with multiple valid solutions that rely on knowledge and reasoning at different cognitive levels. Building on this structure, we formulate three cognition-aware evaluation tasks and propose three complementary metrics to quantify cognitive alignment from multiple perspectives. Extensive experiments on 11 representative LLMs reveal that, while models can often produce correct answers, they still struggle to consistently generate explanations that are aligned with the intended cognitive level. These results highlight substantial room for improvement and establish CogBench as a diagnostic benchmark for advancing cognitively aligned educational AI systems.

Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM) is widely regarded as central to effective persuasion, yet existing evaluations often fail to capture the infer–apply loop that arises in real-world dialogue. We introduce Theory-of-Mind-Guided Elaboration-Likelihood Persuasion (ToMELP), a benchmark that jointly conditions on the audience persona p and the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) route r ∈ central , peripheral within persuasive conversations. The benchmark tests whether large language models can perform ToM inference over multi-turn interactions and leverage these inferences for controllable persuasive generation. ToMELP provides a structured interface with evidence annotations, enabling automated evaluation of persuasive effectiveness, route alignment/deviation, evidence quality under the central route, and robustness to perturbations.

Abstract:
The rapid spread of fake news threatens social stability and public trust, highlighting the urgent need for its effective detection.Although large language models (LLMs) show potential in fake news detection, they are limited by knowledge cutoff and easily generate factual hallucinations when handling time-sensitive news.Furthermore, the thinking of a single LLM easily falls into early stance locking and confirmation bias, making it hard to handle both content reasoning and fact checking simultaneously.To address these challenges, we propose ZoFia, a two-stage zero-shot fake news detection framework.In the first retrieval stage, we propose novel Hierarchical Salience and Salience-Calibrated Minimum Marginal Relevance (SC-MMR) algorithm to extract core entities accurately, which drive dual-source retrieval to overcome knowledge and evidence gaps.In the subsequent stage, a multi-agent system conducts multi-perspective reasoning and verification in parallel and achieves an explainable and robust result via adversarial debate.Comprehensive experiments on two public datasets show that ZoFia outperforms existing zero-shot baselines and even most few-shot methods.Our code has been open-sourced to facilitate the research community at https://github.com/SakiRinn/ZoFia.

Abstract:
LLM-based universal information extraction (UIE) methods often rely on additional information beyond the original training data, which increases training complexity yet often yields limited gains. To address this, we propose ProUIE, a Macro-to-Micro progressive learning approach that improves UIE without introducing any external information. ProUIE consists of three stages: (i) macro-level Complete Modeling (CM), which learns NER, RE, and EE along their intrinsic difficulty order on the full training data to build a unified extraction foundation, (ii) meso-level Streamlined Alignment (SA), which operates on sampled data with simplified target formats, streamlining and regularizing structured outputs to make them more concise and controllable, and (iii) micro-level Deep Exploration (DE), which applies GRPO with stepwise fine-grained rewards (SFR) over structural units to guide exploration and improve performance. Experiments on 36 public datasets show that ProUIE consistently improves unified extraction, outperforming strong instruction-tuned baselines on average for NER and RE while using a smaller backbone, and it further demonstrates clear gains in production-oriented information extraction.

Abstract:
The inability to filter out in advance all potentially problematic data from the pre-training of large language models has given rise to the need for methods for unlearning specific pieces of knowledge after training. Existing techniques overlook the need for continuous and immediate action, causing them to suffer from degraded utility as updates accumulate and protracted exposure of sensitive information. To address these issues, we propose Continual Unlearning in Real Time with Ensured Preservation of LLM Knowledge (CURaTE). Our method begins by training a sentence embedding model on a dataset designed to enable the formation of sharp decision boundaries for determining whether a given input prompt corresponds to any stored forget requests. The similarity of a given input to the forget requests is then used to determine whether to answer or return a refusal response. We show that even with such a simple approach, not only does CURaTE achieve more effective forgetting than existing methods, but by avoiding modification of the language model parameters, it also maintains near perfect knowledge preservation over any number of updates and is the only method capable of continual unlearning in real-time.

Abstract:
Large language models still struggle with faithfulness and hallucinations despite their remarkable reasoning abilities. In Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA), semantic parsing-based approaches address the limitations by understanding constraints in a user’s question and converting them into a logical form to execute on a knowledge graph. However, existing KGQA benchmarks and methods are biased toward positive and calculation constraints. Negative constraints are neglected, although they frequently appear in real-world questions. In this paper, we introduce a new task, NEgative-conSTrained (NEST) KGQA, where each question contains at least one negative constraint, and a corresponding dataset, NestKGQA. We also design PyLF, a Python-formatted logical form, since existing logical forms are hardly suitable to express negation clearly while maintaining readability. Furthermore, NEST questions naturally contain multiple constraints. To mitigate their semantic complexity, we present a novel framework named CUCKOO, specialized to multiple-constrained questions and ensuring semantic executability. CUCKOO first generates a constraint-aware logical form draft and performs schema-guided semantic matching. It then selectively applies self-directed refinement only when executing improper logical forms yields an empty result, reducing cost while improving robustness. Experimental results demonstrate that CUCKOO consistently outperforms baselines on both conventional KGQA and NEST-KGQA benchmarks under few-shot settings.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) to be faithful to new knowledge in complex, multi-hop reasoning tasks is a critical, yet unsolved, challenge. We find that SFT-based methods, e.g., Reason-KE, while state-of-the-art, suffer from a "faithfulness gap": they optimize for format mimicry rather than sound reasoning. This gap enables the LLM’s powerful parametric priors to override new contextual facts, resulting in critical factual hallucinations (e.g., incorrectly reasoning "Houston" from "NASA" despite an explicit edit). To solve this core LLM alignment problem, we propose Reason-KE++, an SFT+RL framework that instills process-level faithfulness. Its core is a Stage-aware Reward mechanism that provides dense supervision for intermediate reasoning steps (e.g., Decomposition, Sub-answer Correctness). Crucially, we identify that naive outcome-only RL is a deceptive trap for LLM alignment: it collapses reasoning integrity (e.g., 19.00% Hop acc) while superficially boosting final accuracy. Our process-aware framework sets a new SOTA of 95.48% on MQUAKE-CF-3k (+5.28%), demonstrating that for complex tasks, aligning the reasoning process is essential for building trustworthy LLMs.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) yet suffers from a mismatch between coarse retrieval granularity and fine-grained generation needs. Specifically, coarse-grained passages inherently conflate valid context with intra-passage noise that semantic retrieval often fails to filter. Existing alignment strategies, typically relying on discrete reranking, struggle to address this granularity mismatch or effectively balance external evidence with internal knowledge. To bridge this gap, we propose AED-RAG, a framework that synergizes discrete retrieval with continuous Adaptive Ensemble Decoding. Specifically, we fine-tune a utility predictor using contrastive perplexity to discern the information density differences between unstructured narrative passages and structured knowledge triplets. During inference, this predictor projects passages, triplets, and the model’s parametric memory into a unified probability space, enabling a soft, token-level fusion that dynamically optimizes information gain. Extensive experiments on four open-domain QA benchmarks demonstrate that AED-RAG significantly outperforms competitive baselines, underscoring the effectiveness of integrating multi-granular contexts.

Abstract:
Length-controllable text generation (LCTG) is essential for tasks like text summarization and report generation. However, large language models (LLMs) have limited awareness of output length, so precise control over the length of generated text remains a significant challenge. Most existing methods focus on prompt-based frameworks, position encoding, and reinforcement learning for model training. These approaches may affect semantic quality, and struggle to maintain consistent length control across different models and tasks. In this paper, we propose DcLM, a model-agnostic approach that introduces dynamic length markers to guide length-controllable outputs. During training, the model leverages these markers as in-context information, without learning to generate them. At inference time, an external word counter and injected length information guide the model to produce outputs of accurate lengths. We evaluate our method across multiple datasets, and the experimental results demonstrate that DcLM significantly reduces length deviation, showcasing its robust generalization ability across various length scales and tasks.

Abstract:
Log-likelihood vectors define a common space for comparing language models as probability distributions, enabling unified comparisons across heterogeneous settings. We extend this framework to training checkpoints and intermediate layers, and establish a consistent scale for KL divergence across pretraining, model size, random seeds, quantization, fine-tuning, and layers. Analysis of Pythia pretraining trajectories further shows that changes in log-likelihood space, as measured by the scaling behavior of KL divergence, are much smaller than in weight space, resulting in subdiffusive learning trajectories and early stabilization of language-model behavior despite weight drift.

Abstract:
With the rapid development of cloud-based services, large language models have become increasingly accessible through various web platforms. However, this accessibility has also led to growing risks of model abuse. LLM watermarking has emerged as an effective approach to mitigate such misuse and protect intellectual property. Existing watermarking algorithms, however, primarily focus on defending against paraphrase attacks while overlooking piggyback spoofing attacks, which can inject harmful content, compromise watermark reliability, and undermine trust in attribution. To address this limitation, we propose DualGuard, the first watermarking algorithm capable of defending against both paraphrase and spoofing attacks. DualGuard employs the adaptive dual-stream watermarking mechanism, in which two complementary watermark signals are dynamically injected based on the semantic content. This design enables DualGuard not only to detect but also to trace spoofing attacks, thereby ensuring reliable and trustworthy watermark detection. Extensive experiments conducted across multiple datasets and language models demonstrate that DualGuard achieves excellent detectability, robustness, traceability, and text quality, effectively advancing the state of LLM watermarking for real-world applications.

Abstract:
Multimodal Sentiment Analysis aims to integrate information from various modalities to make complementary predictions. However, it often struggles with irrelevant or misleading visual and auditory information. Most existing approaches treat entire modality as an independent unit for feature enhancement or denoising, which often suppresses redundant noise at the cost of weakening critical information. To address this challenge, we propose MoLAN, a unified ModaLity-aware noise dynAmic editiNg framework. Specifically, MoLAN performs modality-aware block partitioning by dividing the features of each modality into multiple blocks. Each block is then dynamically assigned a distinct denoising strength based on its noise level and semantic relevance, enabling fine-grained noise suppression while preserving essential multimodal information. Notably, MoLAN is a unified and flexible framework that can be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of multimodal models. Building upon this framework, we further introduce MoLAN+, a new multimodal sentiment analysis approach. Experiments across five models and four datasets demonstrate the broad effectiveness of the MoLAN framework. Extensive evaluations show that MoLAN+ achieves the state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Recent work has demonstrated the promise of orchestrating large language models (LLMs) within evolutionary and agentic optimization systems. However, the mechanisms driving these optimization gains remain poorly understood. In this work, we present a large-scale study of LLM-guided evolutionary search, collecting optimization trajectories for 15 LLMs across 8 tasks. Although zero-shot problem-solving ability correlates with final optimization outcomes, it explains only part of the variance: models with similar initial capability often induce dramatically different search trajectories and outcomes. By analyzing these trajectories, we find that strong LLM optimizers behave as local refiners, producing frequent incremental improvements while progressively localizing the search in semantic space. Conversely, weaker optimizers exhibit large semantic drift, with sporadic breakthroughs followed by stagnation. Notably, various measures of solution novelty do not predict final performance; novelty is beneficial only when the search remains sufficiently localized around high-performing regions of the solution space. Our results highlight the importance of trajectory analysis for understanding and improving LLM-based optimization systems and provide actionable insights for their design and training.

Abstract:
Creating spoken dialogue datasets is methodologically challenging, and these challenges are amplified when the goal is to build multilingual, multi-parallel datasets at scale. This work introduces HEALTHDIAL, a large-scale, multilingual, and multi-parallel dataset for developing and evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)–based spoken dialogue systems. The dataset comprises 6,000 information-seeking dialogues (1,500 per language) grounded in trusted content from the World Health Organization (WHO) and 163 hours of user speech recorded from native speakers of diverse dialects across four official WHO languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, and Spanish. Each speaker is annotated with demographic (e.g., gender, age) and sociolinguistic (e.g., primary language, region of origin) variables. We report benchmark results across key dialogue tasks, which reveal consistent performance disparities across languages, even among high-resource ones. To support future research, we release the dataset, a prototype system, and a toolkit for data collection and system evaluation.

Abstract:
Deep research agents rely on iterative retrieval and reasoning to answer complex queries, but scaling test-time computation raises significant efficiency concerns. We study how to allocate reasoning budget in deep search pipelines, focusing on the role of listwise reranking. Using the BrowseComp-Plus benchmark, we analyze tradeoffs between model scale, reasoning effort, reranking depth, and total token cost via a novel effective token cost (ETC) metric. Our results show that reranking consistently improves retrieval and end-to-end accuracy, and that moderate reranking often yields larger gains than increasing search-time reasoning, achieving comparable accuracy at substantially lower cost. All our code is available at https://github.com/sahel-sh/DeepHone.

Abstract:
A standard technique for scaling inference-time reasoning is Self-Consistency, whereby multiple candidate answers are sampled from an LLM and the most common answer is selected. More recently, it has been shown that weighted majority voting (e.g. Confidence-Informed Self Consistency (CISC)), which assigns a confidence value to each candidate answer and chooses the answer with the largest accumulated score, tends to be more accurate on a wide range of popular benchmarks. In practice, weighted majority voting necessitates calling a critic LLM on each candidate’s reasoning trace to produce the answer’s confidence score. This secondary series of LLM calls greatly increases the overhead and cost of weighted majority voting, despite its potential performance benefits. To reduce this expense, we propose VecCISC, a lightweight, adaptive framework that uses a measure of semantic similarity to filter reasoning traces that are semantically equivalent to others, degenerate, or hallucinated, thus decreasing the number of candidate answers that must be evaluated by the critic. To ensure adequate experimental thoroughness, we evaluated VecCISC on five challenging, widely-adopted datasets spanning the domains of mathematics, chemistry, biology, commonsense reasoning, and the humanities. Our results demonstrate that VecCISC reduces the total token usage by 47%, while maintaining or exceeding the accuracy of CISC.

Abstract:
While LLMs demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities, they remain fragile in multi-step logic deduction, where a single transition error can propagate through the entire reasoning chain, leading to unstable performance. In this work, we identify logical connectives as primary points of this structural fragility. Through empirical analysis, we show that logical connective tokens function as high entropy forking points, at which models frequently struggle to determine the correct logical direction. Motivated by this observation, we hypothesize that intervening in logical connective selection can guide LLMs towards the correct logical direction, thereby improving the overall reasoning chain. To validate this hypothesis, we propose a multi-layered framework that intervenes specifically at these logic-critical junctions in the reasoning process. Specifically, we introduce (1) Gradient-based Logical Steering to guide LLMs internal representations towards valid reasoning subspaces, (2) Localized Branching to resolve ambiguity via targeted look-ahead search, and (3) Targeted Transition Preference Optimization, a surgical reinforcement learning objective that selectively optimizes single-token preferences at logical pivots. Crucially, by concentrating intervention solely on logic-critical transitions, our framework achieves a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off compared to global inference time scaling methods like beam search and self-consistency.

Abstract:
Recent work in NLP has probed large language models for their understanding of cultural norms across countries. However, this work typically considers distributional patterns, ignoring group consensus or possible multicultural environments within a country. In this work, we leverage cultural consensus theory (CCT) from cultural anthropology to model such multidimensional nuance. Applying CCT to the World Values Survey (WVS) across 10 countries and 12 domains, we demonstrate that models frequently misrepresent cultural structures by either failing to form cohesive consensus or severely over-regularizing consensus. Through explicit representation of intra-group variance, CCT provides actionable diagnostics to evaluate when models reflect true human diversity versus algorithmic homogenization.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as scalable tools for mental health counseling, yet evaluating their safety remains challenging due to the interactional and context-dependent nature of clinical harm. Existing evaluation frameworks predominantly assess isolated responses using coarse-grained taxonomies or static datasets, limiting their ability to diagnose how harms emerge and accumulate over multi-turn counseling interactions. In this work, we introduce R-MHSafe, a role-aware mental health safety taxonomy that characterizes clinically significant harm in terms of the interactional roles an AI counselor adopts, including perpetrator, instigator, facilitator, or enabler, combined with clinically grounded harm categories. Then, we propose MHSafeEval, a closed-loop, agent-based evaluation framework that formulates safety assessment as trajectory-level discovery of harm through adversarial multi-turn interactions, guided by role-aware modeling. Using R-MHSafe and MHSafeEval, we conduct a large-scale evaluation across state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results reveal substantial role-dependent and cumulative safety failures that are systematically missed by existing static benchmarks, and show that our framework significantly improves failure-mode coverage and diagnostic granularity.

Abstract:
Existing causal datasets primarily focus on the commonsense domain, where the questions mainly involve simple, single-hop direct causal relationships. When models possess the corresponding knowledge, even if they cannot understand the causal relationships, they can directly arrive at the correct answers through knowledge matching. However, LLMs often perform poorly when answering questions with complex causal structures and domain-specific expertise. To address the above challenges, we propose MDC-Bench, a multidisciplinary causal evaluation benchmark. MDC-Bench adopts a three-level causal framework consisting of 4 core causal tasks, while its sample content covers 7 representative disciplines and diverse causal structures. In view of the limited coverage of multidisciplinary knowledge during the pre-training phase, the model cannot answer questions relying on knowledge matching. The diverse causal structures force the models to grasp the internal causal logic. We also increase the task complexity through methods such as compound causal operations, aiming to enhance the discriminability among models. MDC-Bench achieves the improvement in terms of domain specialization, structural diversity, and task complexity. Through extensive evaluation, we observe that even the advanced models have substantial room for improvement. MDC-Bench not only establishes a standardized baseline for causal research but also provides valuable insights for the applying LLMs in multiple domains.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in reasoning and tool use. However, the fundamental cognitive faculties essential for problem-solving—perception, reasoning, and memory—remain the stable core of intelligence. Unlike memorizing specific patterns, humans succeed in novel environments by applying these intrinsic faculties to adapt and optimize. Yet, whether LLMs possess this essential capacity—namely, the ability to continuously refine solutions in response to dynamic environmental feedback—remains underexplored. To address this challenge, we introduce OPT-BENCH , a benchmark for evaluating self-improvement capabilities in large-scale search spaces. By combining 20 machine learning tasks with 10 classic NP-hard problems, OPT-BENCH provides a rigorous setting to assess whether agents can adapt through intrinsic self-reflection rather than rote tool application. We further propose OPT-Agent , a framework that emulates human-like cognitive adaptation. It operates via a general perception–memory–reasoning loop, iteratively refining solutions based on environmental feedback. Through extensive experiments on 19 LLMs from 7 model families, including reasoning models, general models, and open-source models ranging from 3B to 235B parameters, we demonstrate stronger models are more effective at leveraging feedback signals for self-improvement. However, this upper-bound adaptability remains fundamentally constrained by the models’ base capacity, and even the most advanced LLMs still fall short of human expert performance.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for knowledge graph completion (KGC). However, existing LLM-based approaches often struggle to effectively capture the structural information in knowledge graphs (KGs), leading to suboptimal reasoning performance. To address this challenge, we propose a Multi-layer Aligned Knowledge Injection (MAKI) model, a novel method that tightly integrates structured KG information into LLMs through multi-layer alignment. Specifically, we first leverage LLMs to encode the textual information of entities and relations, obtaining their semantic representations across multiple hidden layers. We then introduce a multi-layer aligned structure learning module, which uses graph neural networks (GNNs) to learn relational structures while aligning with the corresponding LLM layers to bridge the gap between structural and semantic spaces. Finally, a gated fusion mechanism is used to inject the structured knowledge into the LLM for reasoning over candidate triples. Experimental results on various benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed MAKI outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:
Recently, large reasoning models have achieved impressive performance, but their lengthy reasoning processes incur substantial inference overhead. To mitigate this issue, we propose the concept of reasoning vectors, representations extracted from the model’s hidden states, which can guide the model towards generating more concise and accurate responses. Building upon this, we present ERRV, a training framework that elicits efficient reasoning through reasoning vectors, which enables the model to generate high-quality responses during reinforcement learning. By performing targeted policy optimization on both accuracy and length objectives, ERRV effectively activates the model’s latent capability for efficient reasoning. Our experiments demonstrate that after training with ERRV, the model achieves approximately 30% reduction in reasoning length while maintaining stable accuracy, without guidance from the reasoning vector during inference. This establishes a trade-off between efficiency and performance. Furthermore, we identify key properties of reasoning vectors: robustness, characterized by high similarity before and after training, and generalizability, demonstrating applicability across base models, distilled models, RL-trained models, parameter-merged models, and mixed-thought models. These properties collectively guarantee the reliability and broad applicability of our approach.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in medical Question-Answering (QA) but suffer from hallucinations that jeopardize patient safety. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates this by grounding outputs in external evidence, existing pipelines struggle with the complex, rapidly evolving nature of oncology. We present CoMeta, a three-level controllable metadata-aware framework optimized for Cancer Patient QA (CPQA). We introduce Clinical Hybrid Semantic-Symbolic Document Retrieval (CHSDR), which synergizes real-time Boolean search via NCBI E-Utilities with semantic retrieval to overcome metadata blindness. Additionally, we propose Semantic Enhanced Overlap Segmentation (SEOS) to prevent contextual fragmentation. Our results demonstrate that CHSDR significantly improves retrieval performance, CoMeta improved the answer accuracy of Claude-3-haiku by 5.24% over chain-of-thought prompting and about 3% over a naive RAG setup. This study highlights the importance of domain-specific query optimization in realizing the full potential of RAG and provides a robust framework for building more reliable CPQA systems.

Abstract:
Training GUI agents with traditional centralized methods faces significant cost and scalability challenges. Federated learning (FL) offers a promising solution, yet its potential is hindered by the lack of benchmarks that capture real-world, cross-platform heterogeneity. To bridge this gap, we introduce FedGUI, the first comprehensive benchmark for developing and evaluating federated GUI agents across mobile, web, and desktop platforms. FedGUI provides a suite of six curated datasets to systematically study four crucial types of heterogeneity: cross-platform, cross-device, cross-OS, and cross-source. Extensive experiments reveal several key insights: First, we show that cross-platform collaboration improves performance, extending prior mobile-only federated learning to diverse GUI environments; Second, we demonstrate the presence of distinct heterogeneity dimensions and identify platform and OS as the most influential factors. FedGUI provides a vital foundation for the community to build more scalable and privacy-preserving GUI agents for real-world deployment. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/wwh0411/FedGUI..

Abstract:
Large language models are typically post-trained using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), yet effectively unifying efficient knowledge injection with robust generalization remains challenging. In this work, we provide a training-dynamics analysis showing that SFT can be interpreted as a special case of policy gradient optimization with an extremely sparse implicit reward and unstable inverse-probability weighting, which together lead to single-path dependency, entropy collapse, and gradient explosion. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose Group Fine-Tuning (GFT), a unified post-training framework that addresses these intrinsic limitations through two mechanisms: Group Advantage Learning, which constructs diverse response groups and derives normalized contrastive supervision to alleviate reward sparsity, and Dynamic Coefficient Rectification, which adaptively bounds inverse-probability weights to stabilize optimization while preserving efficient knowledge injection. Experiments demonstrate that GFT consistently surpasses SFT-based methods and yields policies that integrate more smoothly with subsequent RL training.Our code is publicly available athttps://github.com/ZJU-OmniAI/GFT.

Abstract:
As Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) become an indispensable assistant in human life, the unsafe content generated by MLLMs poses a danger to human behavior, perpetually overhanging human society like a sword of Damocles. To investigate and evaluate the safety impact of MLLMs responses on human behavior in daily life, we introduce SaLAD, a multimodal satety benchmark which contains 2,013 real-world image–text samples across 10 common categories, with a balanced design covering both unsafe scenarios and cases of oversensitivity. It emphasizes realistic risk exposure, authentic visual inputs, and fine-grained cross-modal reasoning, ensuring that safety risks cannot be inferred from text alone. We further propose a safety-warning-based evaluation framework that encourages models to provide clear and informative safety warnings, rather than generic refusals. Results on 18 MLLMs demonstrate that the top-performing models achieve a safe response rate of only 57.2% on unsafe queries. Morevoer, even popular safety alignment methods limit effectiveness of the models in our scenario, revealing the vulnerabilities of current MLLMs in identifying dangerous behaviors in daily life. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/xinyuelou/SaLAD .

Abstract:
Key-Value (KV) caching is essential for efficient inference in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), yet its memory footprint grows linearly with context length and becomes a major bottleneck due to the large number of visual tokens. Recent prefill-stage KV selection methods estimate KV importance from prefilling statistics, implicitly assuming that prefilling-time queries are representative of those encountered during decoding. We show that this assumption breaks down in multimodal inference, where decoding-time queries exhibit substantially larger variance than prefilling-stage representations, leading to unstable KV importance estimation under tight cache budgets. As a result, small ranking errors can disproportionately discard semantically critical visual tokens and degrade grounding and reasoning performance. We propose MM-ShiftKV, a training-free, decode-aware and strictly prefill-only KV selection method. MM-ShiftKV approximates decoding-time query behavior during prefilling by constructing variance-expanded query proxies and estimates prompt KV importance based on their aggregated attention mass. Experiments on multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that MM-ShiftKV consistently outperforms existing methods under strict KV-cache budgets.

Abstract:
Machine-generated text detection, as an important task, is predominantly focused on English in research. This makes the existing detectors almost unusable for non-English languages, relying purely on cross-lingual transferability. There exist only a few works focused on any of Central European languages, leaving the transferability towards these languages rather unexplored. We fill this gap by providing the first benchmark of detection methods focused on this region, while also providing comparison of train-languages combinations to identify the best performing ones. We focus on multi-domain, multi-generator, and multilingual evaluation, pinpointing the differences of individual aspects, as well as adversarial robustness of detection methods. Supervised finetuned detectors in the Central European languages are found the most performant in these languages as well as the most resistant against obfuscation.

Abstract:
Complex table question answering (TQA) remains challenging, as real-world table, usually designed for human readability with multi-level headers and fragmented hierarchical semantics, largely hindering large language models (LLMs) from accurately aligning conditions, attributes, and values during reasoning. Existing approaches typically rely on handcrafted table linearization or prompts, forcing LLMs to infer header hierarchies, which frequently leads to brittle reasoning and hallucinations. To this end, we propose SMART, a unified framework that explicitly decouples table structure understanding from reasoning execution. SMART consists of three components: Semantic Header Flattening for converting multi-level headers into explicit single-level descriptors, Global Understanding for capturing holistic table–question semantics, and Pseudo-Code-Style Reasoning for structured, step-by-step inference with external validation. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that SMART substantially improves both the accuracy and robustness of complex TQA, achieving state-of-the-art performance.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) personalization typically relies on modeling each user in isolation, conditioning on their historical interactions to adapt model behavior. However, this user-centric formulation overlooks the collective knowledge shared across users, limiting generalization for users with sparse histories and amplifying overfitting for those with highly skewed behaviors. We argue that effective personalization requires leveraging both individual preferences and population-level patterns. To this end, we propose LoGo, a Local–Global knowledge framework that augments user-specific signals with a global knowledge encoding collective behavioral trends. LoGo models global knowledge through a temporally evolving process that captures how population-wide preferences change over time, and a community-aware structure that organizes users into coherent groups with shared interests. To balance potentially conflicting local and global signals, LoGo employs a mediator module that adaptively fuses the two knowledge sources. Experiments on five personalization benchmarks show that LoGo consistently enhances personalization quality, outperforming existing methods by improving generalization in users with limited histories and mitigating bias in users with abundant histories. These results demonstrate the central role of collective knowledge in advancing LLM personalization. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Zehong-Wang/LoGo.

Abstract:
Current approaches for Natural Language to SPARQL (NL2SPARQL) generation primarily rely on one-turn, training-intensive models. While effective in specific settings, these models often lack generalizability and fail to provide transparency or mechanisms for error recovery in realistic scenarios. Additionally, prior interactive works are largely outdated and incompatible with modern large language model (LLM) workflows. In this paper, we introduce InteracSPARQL, a training-free interactive refinement pipeline that acts as a plug-and-play enhancement for existing SPARQL generation systems. Our approach integrates a set of efficient entity and property lookup tools within a self-correction loop, guided by a novel hybrid Natural Language Explanation (NLE) module. This module combines rule-based Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) parsing with LLM semantic enrichment to produce explanations that are both structurally accurate and linguistically fluent. We evaluate InteracSPARQL on standard benchmarks (QALD-9 and QALD-10), showing that our tool-augmented self-refinement significantly boosts the accuracy of base models without fine-tuning. Furthermore, human evaluation confirms that our structured explanations substantially improve user understanding and ability to correct queries compared to unstructured baselines.

Abstract:
Long-context understanding poses significant challenges in natural language processing, particularly for real-world dialogues characterized by high redundancy and uneven information density. Although large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive results on existing benchmarks, these datasets fail to reflect the complexities of such texts, limiting their applicability to practical scenarios. To bridge this gap, we construct the first spoken long-text dataset, derived from live streams, designed to reflect the redundancy-rich and conversational nature of real-world scenarios. We construct tasks in three categories: retrieval, reasoning, and hybrid tasks. We then evaluate both popular LLMs and specialized methods to assess their ability to understand long contexts in these tasks. Our results show that current methods exhibit strong task-specific preferences and perform poorly on highly redundant inputs, with no single method consistently outperforming others. We propose a new baseline that better handles redundancy in spoken text and achieves strong performance across tasks. Our findings highlight key limitations of current methods and suggest future directions for improving long-context understanding. Finally, our benchmark fills a gap in evaluating long-context spoken language understanding and provides a practical foundation for developing real-world e-commerce systems. The code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/Yarayx/livelongbench.

Abstract:
Recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable success in general semantic understanding. However, they still struggle with 3D spatial reasoning tasks, such as estimating metric distances or understanding precise relative positions. Previous works, like SpatialVLM, tried to address this by using synthesized spatial VQA dataset. However, they are fundamentally limited because their vision encoders are biased toward 2D patterns learned from image-text pairs. In this paper, we argue that this lack of 3D awareness is a critical bottleneck that cannot be solved by data scaling alone. To address this, we propose Pseudo Geometric Distillation (PseudoGD), a framework designed to help vision encoders internalize 3D geometric information using only standard 2D images. PseudoGD explicitly injects metric scale and structural context into the encoder through a Joint Training strategy. This approach optimizes geometric learning and spatial VQA tasks together, ensuring that the Large Language Model (LLM) aligns well with the improved visual features in real-time. Extensive experiments on the OmniSpatial benchmark demonstrate that PseudoGD achieves State-of-the-Art (SOTA) performance across various model architectures. Notably, significant improvements in Hypothetical Perspective Taking and Locate tasks prove that our model has effectively learned a physical sense of space.

Abstract:
Most venture capital (VC) investments fail, while a few deliver outsized returns. Predicting startup success requires synthesizing relational evidence across company fundamentals, investor track records, and investment networks through explicit reasoning, which traditional machine learning and graph neural networks lack. Large language models excel at reasoning, but applying them to VC prediction must address: selecting compact evidence subgraphs from large investment networks, one-sided label noise where failures may be latent successes, and grounding decisions in structured VC domain knowledge. We present MIRAGE-VC, an evidence-grounded reasoning framework with three innovations. First, an information-gain-driven retriever distills networks into compact evidence subgraphs. Second, a dual-layer knowledge base grounds reasoning in VC principles. Third, a noise-aware mechanism down-weights mislabeled negatives via improved Positive-Unlabeled (PU) estimation. MIRAGE-VC achieves +5.9% F1 and +22.1% Precision@5 over state-of-the-art baselines. Expert evaluation confirms professional-quality rationales. We further validate our approach on public data with consistent improvements. Code and reasoning results are available at: https://github.com/ZhangDataLab/MIRAGE-VC.git

Abstract:
Large audio-language models (LALMs) extend language understanding into the auditory domain, yet their ability to perform low-level listening, such as pitch and duration detection, remains underexplored. However, low-level listening is critical for real-world, out-of-distribution tasks where models must reason about unfamiliar sounds based on fine-grained acoustic cues. To address this gap, we introduce the World-of-Whale benchmark (WoW-Bench) to evaluate low-level auditory perception and cognition using marine mammal vocalizations. We use marine mammal vocalizations as out-of-distribution sound events to better assess models’ low-level listening and so that the models do not rely on prior knowledge of the sound events. WoW-bench is composed of a Perception benchmark for categorizing novel sounds and a Cognition benchmark, inspired by Bloom’s taxonomy, to assess the abilities to remember, understand, apply, and analyze sound events. For the Cognition benchmark, we additionally introduce distractor questions to evaluate whether models are truly solving problems through listening rather than relying on other heuristics. Experiments with state-of-the-art LALMs show performance far below human levels, indicating a need for stronger auditory grounding in LALMs.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) often hallucinate in question answering (QA) tasks due to a lack of factual knowledge. While integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) with LLMs has alleviated this issue, existing methods suffer from poor generalization or low reasoning efficiency, and critically, they overlook the learning and reuse of reasoning paths from past experiences. To address these challenges, we introduce Thought-Action Graph (TAG), a structured repository of reasoning experiences. TAG decomposes successful LLM-KG interaction trajectories into fine-grained semantic operators, which are stored in TAG constructed by the thought layer and action layer. Building upon TAG, we propose a novel KGQA paradigm — TAG-Reasoning (TAGR). TAGR first retrieves and assembles reasoning blueprints from TAG, and then guides LLM to efficiently execute on KG according to them. Through this approach, TAGR transforms the computationally expensive online exploration process of LLMs into an offline process of TAG retrieval and assembly. Experimental results on multiple KGQA benchmarks demonstrate that TAGR significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods across key metrics, while drastically reducing the number of LLM calls and generated tokens. This work opens new avenues for building continual learning, efficient, and faithful KGQA systems.

Abstract:
Advanced speech synthesis technologies have enabled highly realistic speech generation, posing security risks that motivate research into audio deepfake detection (ADD). While state space models (SSMs) offer linear complexity, pure causal SSMs architectures often struggle with the content-based retrieval required to capture global frequency-domain artifacts. To address this, we explore the scaling properties of hybrid architectures by proposing XLSR-MamBo, a modular framework integrating an XLSR front-end with synergistic Mamba-Attention backbones. We systematically evaluate four topological designs using advanced SSM variants, Mamba, Mamba2, Hydra, and Gated DeltaNet. Experimental results demonstrate that the MamBo-3-Hydra-N3 configuration achieves competitive performance compared to other state-of-the-art systems on the ASVspoof 2021 LA, DF, and In-the-Wild benchmarks. This performance benefits from Hydra’s native bidirectional modeling, which captures holistic temporal dependencies more efficiently than the heuristic dual-branch strategies employed in prior works. Furthermore, evaluations on the DFADD dataset demonstrate robust generalization to unseen diffusion- and flow-matching-based synthesis methods. Crucially, our analysis reveals that scaling backbone depth effectively mitigates the performance variance and instability observed in shallower models. These results demonstrate the hybrid framework’s ability to capture artifacts in spoofed speech signals, providing an effective method for ADD. Codes are publicly available at https://github.com/saki-ciallo/XLSR-MamBo.

Abstract:
Enhancing the task-specific capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) primarily requires substantial instruction-tuning datasets. However, the sheer volume of such data imposes a considerable annotation cost, and a lack of optimization methods for tailoring LLMs to specific tasks persists. To address the above issues, we propose a Planning framework for constructing Extractive-based LLMs called PlanE, which includes data decomposition, instruction tuning, and prompt inference. Additionally, we introduce a Data-Tuning-Inference (DTI) planner, aimed at selecting the optimal base-LLM and its DTI combinations for specific datasets to improve construction efficiency. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our PlanE from two views: (1) across different datasets using the same base-LLM, and (2) on the same dataset using different base-LLMs. Furthermore, we validate the generalizability of the proposed DTI planner under different optimization objectives. The codes are publicly available at https://github.com/gugugu-469/PlanE.

Abstract:
Integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) with large language models (LLMs) enhances factual accuracy and interpretability in question answering. However, existing agent-based methods rely on static memory mechanisms that fail to address the combinatorial explosion of search spaces in multi-hop reasoning and lack continuous learning capabilities. To overcome these limitations, we propose EvoMemKG, an agent framework with a dynamic, evolvable memory mechanism specifically designed for KG reasoning. EvoMemKG features a dual-layer memory architecture: (1) a working memory that losslessly compresses retrieved triplets through clustering to manage exploration states, effectively linearizing the exponential state space expansion; and (2) an experience memory that abstracts historical reasoning paths into reusable, generalized strategies, enabling cross-task knowledge transfer and self-evolution. We further introduce a double-loop workflow that orchestrates the LLM, memory layers, and KG environment to enable end-to-end autonomous reasoning. Extensive evaluations on three KGQA datasets across two KGs demonstrate that EvoMemKG achieves state-of-the-art performance without requiring additional training or specialized tools. Notably, it achieves improvements of up to 20% over the strong baseline on complex multi-hop queries, validating the effectiveness of our dynamic memory approach.

Abstract:
Although Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) revolutionized parameter-efficient fine-tuning, it often incurs an inference overhead due to the extra computation required by adapter layers. While most literature focuses on maximizing accuracy or minimizing parameter counts, this paper prioritizes single-request inference performance in the unmerged adapter setting, where adapters must remain decoupled from the base model at runtime. By analyzing LoRA adapters on GPUs, we identify segmented function calls as the primary source of this latency. To address this, we propose G rouped A daptive W eight S haring (GAWS), a novel adapter design based on structured Kronecker product decomposition . Experiments on T5-3B, GPT-2 Large, LLaMA3.2-3B, and RoBERTa-Large show that GAWS reduces latency to about 40% of the gap between the unmerged LoRA and the base model, while maintaining parameter efficiency and comparable accuracy. This positions GAWS as a Pareto-efficient solution for deploying adapted LLMs in latency-sensitive settings, balancing the high latency of compressed adapters with the accuracy of LoRA. The source code is available at:https://github.com/SamsungLabs/GAWS .

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in user-facing applications, raising concerns that they may reflect and amplify social biases. We investigate social identity biases in Chinese LLMs using Mandarin-specific prompts across ten representative models. Our evaluation compares ingroup (“We”) and outgroup (“They”) framings across 240 social groups salient in the Chinese context, using a two-tiered measurement framework that assesses both sentiment and toxicity. The prompt design explicitly accounts for linguistic properties of Mandarin, including the distinction between the default plural pronoun 他们 and the explicitly feminine plural 她们, enabling a controlled comparison of social identity framing effects. Across models, we observe systematic ingroup–outgroup asymmetries, although their expression differs across measurement dimensions. In particular, instruction tuning often reduces sentiment asymmetries, while toxicity gaps remain more persistent. Moreover, the feminine-marked plural 她们 is associated with higher toxicity than the default plural in several models. Our study introduces a language-aware evaluation framework for Chinese LLMs and shows that (i) social identity biases previously documented in English also manifest in Chinese and that (ii) Mandarin-specific linguistic structure can reveal bias patterns that are not directly observable in English-only settings.

Abstract:
GPS trajectories encode rich behavioral information about how people move, organize activities, and form daily routines. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) raise a natural question: can such models infer and summarize travel behavior directly from mobility traces? This paper introduces TravelBehaviorQA, a large-scale benchmark dataset that reframes trajectory analysis as a language-based behavioral understanding task. The dataset links raw GPS trajectories with human-grounded question-answering (QA) pairs that capture travel intensity, temporal structure, activity patterns, mode usage, and behavioral routines. Unlike prior mobility datasets focused on prediction or classification, TravelBehaviorQA emphasizes semantic interpretation through a unified mix of deterministic and open-ended questions. In this benchmark, we construct over 143k QA instances spanning users and years, and evaluate a broad range of state-of-the-art LLMs under controlled settings. Our results reveal substantial gaps between factual extraction and genuine behavioral reasoning, showing that model scale alone is insufficient and that trajectory representation is a primary bottleneck. TravelBehaviorQA exposes critical limitations of current models and establishes a rigorous benchmark for advancing language-based understanding of human mobility behavior.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) excel at handling long-context sequences, they require substantial prefill computation and key-value (KV) cache, which can heavily burden computational efficiency and memory usage in both prefill and decoding stages.Recent works that compress KV caches with prefill acceleration reduce this cost but inadvertently tie the prefill compute reduction to the decoding KV budget. This coupling arises from overlooking the layer-dependent variation of critical context, often leading to accuracy degradation. To address this issue, we introduce FastKV, a KV cache compression framework designed to reduce latency in both prefill and decoding by leveraging the stabilization of token importance in later layers.FastKV performs full-context computation until a Token-Selective Propagation (TSP) layer, which forwards only the most informative tokens to subsequent layers.From these propagated tokens, FastKV independently selects salient KV entries for caching, thereby decoupling KV budget from the prefill compute reduction based on the TSP decision.This independent control of the TSP rate and KV retention rate enables flexible optimization of efficiency and accuracy.Experimental results show that FastKV achieves speedups of up to 1.82 × in prefill and 2.87 × in decoding compared to the full-context baseline, while matching the accuracy of the decoding-only baselines.Our code is available at https://github.com/dongwonjo/FastKV.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to exhibit sycophancy, a tendency to align with user assertions even when they conflict with facts. We frame sycophancy as a sociolinguistic phenomenon, disentangling two distinct drivers of credibility: explicit authority (credentials) and implicit authority (linguistic register). We introduce the Sycophancy Matrix, an adversarial evaluation framework that isolates these variables. Using a controlled subset of TruthfulQA, we evaluate open-weight models across English, Spanish, and Portuguese variants. Our findings reveal that models often conflate high register with truthfulness: for some architectures, sophisticated tone triggers deference more effectively than explicit expertise. Furthermore, we observe statistically significant variability across cultural variants of Spanish and Portuguese, supporting the hypothesis that LLMs internalise language-specific sociolinguistic norms and that sycophancy is not a purely technical deficit but an emergent property of multilingual training and alignment. Finally, we identify stable sycophancy fingerprints–domain-specific vulnerability profiles that persist across languages–suggesting that alignment artefacts are intrinsic to model families rather than linguistic context.

Abstract:
Detecting missing foreign keys (FKs) requires accurately modeling semantic dependencies across database schemas, which conventional heuristic-based methods are fundamentally limited in capturing. We propose LLM-FK, the first fully automated multi-agent framework for FK detection, designed to address three core challenges that hinder naive LLM-based solutions in large-scale complex databases: combinatorial search space explosion, ambiguous inference under limited context, and global inconsistency arising from isolated local predictions. LLM-FK coordinates four specialized agents: a Profiler that decomposes the FK detection problem into the task of validating FK candidate column pairs and prunes the search space via a unique-key-driven schema decomposition strategy; an Interpreter that injects self-augmented domain knowledge; a Refiner that constructs compact structural representations and performs multi-perspective chain-of-thought reasoning; and a Verifier that enforces schema-wide consistency through a holistic conflict resolution strategy. Experiments on five benchmark datasets demonstrate that LLM-FK consistently achieves F1-scores above 93%, surpassing existing baselines by 15% on the large-scale MusicBrainz database, while reducing the candidate search space by two to three orders of magnitude without losing true FKs and maintaining robustness under challenging conditions like missing data. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and scalability of LLM-FK in real-world databases.

Abstract:
Pre-trained language models (LMs) have, over the last few years, grown substantially in both societal adoption and training costs. This rapid growth in size has constrained progress in understanding and mitigating their biases. Since re-training LMs is prohibitively expensive, most debiasing work has focused on post-hoc or masking-based strategies, which often fail to address the underlying causes of bias. In this work, we seek to democratise pre-model debiasing research by using low-cost proxy models. Specifically, we investigate BabyLMs, compact BERT-like models trained on small and mutable corpora that can approximate bias acquisition and learning dynamics of larger models. We show that BabyLMs display closely aligned patterns of intrinsic bias formation and performance development compared to standard BERT models, despite their drastically reduced size. Furthermore, correlations between BabyLMs and BERT hold across multiple intra-model and post-model debiasing methods. Leveraging these similarities, we conduct pre-model debiasing experiments with BabyLMs, replicating prior findings and presenting new insights regarding the influence of gender imbalance and toxicity on bias formation. Our results demonstrate that BabyLMs can serve as an effective sandbox for large-scale LMs, reducing pre-training costs from over 500 GPU-hours to under 30 GPU-hours. This provides a way to democratise pre-model debiasing research and enables faster, more accessible exploration of methods for building fairer LMs.

Abstract:
Despite the advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), training specialized reasoning models for the medical domain remains a significant challenge due to the scarcity of high-quality, large-scale Chain-of-Thought (CoT) data. Moreover, the intermediate reasoning steps in teacher-generated CoT data can be redundant and noisy, leading models to acquire spurious patterns and resulting in suboptimal performance. To address these issues, we propose MedCoach, a novel framework that introduces a dedicated coach role to guide the student model through question decomposition, thereby smoothing its learning curve in medical reasoning. The framework employs a curriculum-oriented warm-up on simplified sub-questions, facilitating domain adaptation before advancing to complex long-chain reasoning. To ensure the fidelity of the intermediate chain-of-thought signals, we augment this phase with medical knowledge graphs to suppress factual drift and mitigate reasoning noise at a granular level.Subsequently, we introduce a targeted factual perturbation mechanism to foster fine-grained discrimination between valid fact utilization and subtle factual misapplications. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate notable improvements over existing methods, validating the effectiveness of MedCoach.

Abstract:
Long-term conversational large language model (LLM) agents require memory systems that can recover relevant evidence from historical interactions without overwhelming the answer stage with irrelevant context. However, existing memory systems, including hierarchical ones, still often rely solely on vector similarity for retrieval. It tends to produce bloated evidence sets: adding many superficially similar dialogue turns yields little additional recall, but lowers retrieval precision, increases answer-stage context cost, and makes retrieved memories harder to inspect and manage. To address this, we propose HiGMem (Hierarchical and LLM-Guided Memory System), a two-level event-turn memory system that allows LLMs to use event summaries as semantic anchors to predict which related turns are worth reading. This allows the model to inspect high-level event summaries first and then focus on a smaller set of potentially useful turns, providing a concise and reliable evidence set through reasoning, while avoiding the retrieval overhead that would be excessively high compared to vector retrieval.On the LoCoMo10 benchmark, HiGMem achieves the best F1 on four of five question categories and improves adversarial F1 from 0.54 to 0.78 over A-Mem, while retrieving an order of magnitude fewer turns. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/ZeroLoss-Lab/HiGMem.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are foundational in various applications due to their extensive knowledge from pre-training and fine-tuning. Despite this, they are prone to generating factual and commonsense errors, raising concerns in critical areas like healthcare, journalism, and education to mislead users. Current methods for evaluating LLMs’ veracity are limited by the need for extensive human labor, test data contamination, or limited scope, hindering efficient and effective exposure of errors. To address these challenges, we propose HalluHunter, a novel, fully automated framework for systematically uncovering factual inaccuracies in LLMs. HalluHunter employs a knowledge-graph-based approach, extracting fact triplets to generate diverse question types for single- and multi-hop reasoning using rule-based Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Its iterative process starts with random triplet selection for question generation, followed by adaptive selection in subsequent iterations, targeting triplets where LLMs frequently err based on their performance analysis. Our extensive tests on nine prominent LLMs reveal that HalluHunter can trigger factual errors in up to 55% of questions in these models. Moreover, we demonstrate that HalluHunter’s test cases, particularly in adaptive selection, could further expose the weaknesses in benchmarking the factuality in LLMs meanwhile maintaining the coverage of questions. All code, data, and results will be released for future research.

Abstract:
The value alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critical because value is the foundation of LLM decision-making and behavior. Some recent work show that LLMs have similar value rankings. However, little is known about how susceptible LLM value rankings are to external influence and how different values are correlated with each other. In this work, we investigate the plasticity of LLM value systems by examining how their value rankings are influenced by different prompting strategies and exploring the intrinsic relationships between values. To this end, we design 6 different value transformation prompting methods including direct instruction, rubrics, in-context learning, scenario, persuasion, and persona, and benchmark the effectiveness of these methods on 3 different families and totally 8 LLMs. Our main findings include that the value rankings in large LLMs are much more susceptible to external influence than small LLMs, and there are intrinsic correlations between certain values (e.g., Privacy and Respect). Besides, through detailed correlation analysis, we find that the value correlations are more similar between large LLMs of different families than small LLMs of the same family. We also identify that scenario method is the strongest persuader and can help entrench the value rankings.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) provide robots with contextual reasoning abilities to comprehend human instructions. Yet, current LLM-enabled robots typically depend on cloud-based models or high-performance computing infrastructure, which limit their deployment on robots under unreliable internet environments or with constrained computational resources, such as UAVs and small ground vehicles. Thus, deploying fine-tuned small language models (SLMs) that support onboard deployment offers a promising alternative. This paper introduces Ro-SLM, a framework that enables reliable SLM-driven robot operation by distilling LLMs’ knowledge and reasoning. Ro-SLM starts from dataset synthesis by leveraging LLMs to generate diverse task instructions, produce corresponding ground truth code with minimal human assistance, and augment instructions into real-world application scenarios. Ro-SLM is then fine-tuned with the dataset, in which LLM serves as a reward function to guide the training. Extensive experiments on UAV operation tasks demonstrate that Ro-SLM improves the performance of SLM from being incapable of supporting robotic task planning and code generation to achieving performance that approaches LLM.

Abstract:
Web agents have demonstrated strong performance on a wide range of web-based tasks. However, existing research on the effect of environmental variation has mostly focused on robustness to adversarial attacks, with less attention to agents’ preferences in benign scenarios. Although early studies have examined how textual attributes influence agent behavior, a systematic understanding of how visual attributes shape agent decision-making remains limited. To address this, we introduce VAF, a controlled evaluation pipeline for quantifying how webpage Visual Attribute Factors influence web-agent decision-making. Specifically, VAF consists of three stages: (i) variant generation, which ensures the variants share identical semantics as the original item while only differ in visual attributes; (ii) browsing interaction, where agents navigate the page via scrolling and clicking the interested item, mirroring how human users browse online; (iii) validating through both click action and reasoning from agents, which we use the Target Click Rate and Target Mention Rate to jointly evaluate the effect of visual attributes. By quantitatively measuring the decision-making difference between the original and variant, we identify which visual attributes influence agents’ behavior most. Extensive experiments, across 8 variant families (48 variants total), 5 real-world websites (including shopping, travel, and news browsing), and 4 representative web agents, show that background color contrast, item size, position, and card clarity have a strong influence on agents’ actions, whereas font styling, text color, and item image clarity exhibit minor effects.

Abstract:
Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is widely used for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models, but it is notably ineffective at removing backdoor behaviors from poisoned pretrained models when fine-tuning on clean dataset. Contrary to the common belief that this weakness is caused primarily by low rank, we show that LoRA’s vulnerability is fundamentally spectral. Our analysis identifies two key factors: LoRA updates (i) possess insufficient spectral strength, with singular values far below those of pretrained weights, and (ii) exhibit unfavorable spectral alignment, weakly matching clean-task directions while retaining overlap with trigger-sensitive subspaces. We further establish a critical scaling threshold beyond which LoRA can theoretically suppress trigger-induced activations, and we show empirically that standard LoRA rarely reaches this regime. We introduce Regularized Low-Rank Adaptation (RoRA), which improves forgetting by increasing spectral strength and correcting alignment through clean-strengthened regularization, trigger-insensitive constraints, and post-training spectral rescaling. Experiments across multiple NLP benchmarks and attack settings show that RoRA substantially reduces attack success rates while maintaining clean accuracy.

Abstract:
Knowledge Tracing (KT) is a pivotal task in personalized education, aiming to predict students’ future performance based on their historical interactions. While prior work has focused on learning behavioral sequences using question IDs or surface-level textual features, these methods often fail to capture complex behavioral patterns due to a lack of deep reasoning capabilities and world knowledge. To address this, we propose LLM-KT, a novel framework that integrates the reasoning power of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the sequential modeling strengths of traditional KT methods via multi-level plug-and-play alignment. Specifically, for task-level alignment, we design a plug-and-play instruction to leverage the rich knowledge and reasoning capacity of LLMs for the KT objective. For modality-level alignment, we introduce two mechanisms to integrate representations learned by traditional methods: (1) a Semantic History Projector that flexibly inserts compressed context embeddings into LLMs using question- and concept-specific tokens to capture long-term history; and (2) a Behavioral Dynamics Projector that enhances LLMs with sequential interaction patterns via a sequence adapter. Extensive experiments on four standard datasets demonstrate that LLM-KT achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming over 20 competitive baselines.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in macroeconomic agent-based modeling(ABM). However, existing research focuses on replicating macro-level stylized facts while often neglecting verification of micro-level decision-making. We investigate this gap by comparing LLM agents to human responses from the Survey of Consumer Expectations (SCE) dataset. Our empirical analysis identifies specific limitations: weak trend responsiveness, mode collapse, and a potential data leakage. We propose the Heterogeneous Shock-Response Causal Transmission Framework to tackle these issues. To ensure theoretical consistency, we use LLMs to build a literature-verified causal graph in which macroeconomic shocks influence decisions via generated mediator nodes, while agent profiles serve as edge moderators. Building on this, during inference, we perform a path search to retrieve relevant causal chains and inject them as an explicit Chain-of-Thought(CoT), prioritizing mechanistic logic over statistical pattern matching. To evaluate the effectiveness of our inference approach, we validate it via a two-stage process that combines micro-level dataset testing and macro-level simulation in the EconAgent system. Results from these experiments indicate that our framework improves alignment with human trends and effectively captures behavioral heterogeneity. Overall, this work contributes to the development of reliable and grounded economic simulations.

Abstract:
The Science of Science (SciSci) examines how scientific knowledge is generated, evaluated, and transformed by utilizing large-scale scholarly and bibliometric data. As these data grow in scale and complexity, analysis has increasingly relied on statistical, network-based, machine learning methods, and is now seeing growing involvement of AI agents. This emerging class of such agents, ranging from multi-agent simulations of scientific behavior to tool-augmented systems for empirical analysis, is beginning to reshape how SciSci research is conducted. In this survey, we propose a task-centered taxonomy, distinguishing agents as simulations, which model citation, collaboration, and community dynamics, from agents as tools, which assist empirical analysis and scientific workflows. We review agent architectures, learning mechanisms, evaluation, and SciSci benchmarks, and examine open challenges related to reliability, data quality, and bias. Our survey aims to clarify the landscape of AI agents in SciSci and to support the development of reliable and scientifically useful AI systems for studying science and scientific communities.

Abstract:
Recent action recognition based on vision–language pretraining and self-supervised video foundation models tends to induce spurious correlations and shortcut learning by relying on action-irrelevant cues, such as backgrounds and object co-occurrences. By contrast, object-detection-based approaches can suppress spurious correlations; however, the loss of input information can limit accuracy. To mitigate this trade-off, we combine these two approaches to learn complementary features that compensate for each other’s shortcomings. Specifically, we leverage the commonsense knowledge of large language models (LLMs) regarding human actions and realize a framework in which an LLM agent integrates the two approaches within an agentic learning paradigm to design motion features tailored to the target actions. The LLM agent uses an open vocabulary object detector to instruct the video foundation model with the target and nontarget objects in the video to make the model attend to objects in a video required for recognizing the target actions. The composition of the detected objects is optimized for the target actions through in-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) using the commonsense knowledge of the LLM. Experiments on multiple public action recognition datasets and an ablation study confirm the robustness of features learned using the proposed method and the effectiveness of ICRL.

Abstract:
As medical LLMs transition to clinical deployment, assessing their ethical reasoning capability becomes critical. While achieving high accuracy on knowledge benchmarks, LLMs lack validated assessment for navigating ethical trade-offs in clinical decision-making where multiple valid solutions exist. Existing benchmarks lack systematic approaches to incorporate recognized philosophical frameworks and expert validation for ethical reasoning assessment. We introduce PrinciplismQA, a philosophy-grounded approach to assessing LLM clinical medical ethics alignment. Grounded in Principlism, our approach provides a systematic methodology for incorporating clinical ethics philosophy into LLM assessment design. PrinciplismQA comprises 3,648 expert-validated questions spanning knowledge assessment and clinical reasoning. Our expert-calibrated pipeline enables reproducible evaluation and models ethical biases. Evaluating recent models reveals significant ethical reasoning gaps despite high knowledge accuracy, demonstrating that knowledge-oriented training does not ensure clinical ethical alignment. PrinciplismQA provides a validated tool for assessing clinical AI deployment readiness.

Abstract:
Standardized math assessments require expensive human pilot studies to establish the difficulty of test items. We investigate the predictive value of open-source large language models (LLMs) for evaluating the difficulty of multiple-choice math questions for real-world students. We show that, while LLMs are poor direct judges of problem difficulty, simulation-based approaches with LLMs yield promising results under the right conditions. Under the proposed approach, we simulate a "classroom" of 4th, 8th, or 12th grade students by prompting the LLM to role-play students of varying proficiency levels. We use the outcomes of these simulations to fit Item Response Theory (IRT) models, comparing learned difficulty parameters for items to their real-world difficulties, as determined by item-level statistics furnished by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). We observe correlations as high as 0.75, 0.76, and 0.82 for grades 4, 8, and 12, respectively. In our simulations, we experiment with different "classroom sizes," showing tradeoffs between computation size and accuracy. We find that role-plays with named students improves predictions (compared to student ids), and stratifying names across gender and race further improves predictions. Our results show that LLMs with relatively weaker mathematical abilities (Gemma) actually yield better real-world difficulty predictions than mathematically stronger models (Llama and Qwen), further underscoring the suitability of open-source models for the task.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance on mathematical reasoning under well-defined conditions. However, real-world engineering problems involve uncertainty, context, and open-ended settings that extend beyond symbolic computation. Existing benchmarks largely focus on well-defined or abstract reasoning and therefore fail to capture these complexities. We introduce EngiBench, a hierarchical benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on solving engineering problems. It spans three levels of increasing difficulty (foundational knowledge retrieval, contextual reasoning, and open-ended modeling) and covers diverse engineering subfields. To facilitate a deeper understanding of model performance, we systematically rewrite each problem into three controlled variants (perturbed, knowledge-enhanced, and math abstraction), enabling us to separately evaluate the model’s robustness, domain-specific knowledge, and mathematical reasoning abilities. Experimental results show clear performance stratification across difficulty levels: model accuracy declines with task complexity, degrades under minor perturbations, and remains substantially below human performance on high-level engineering tasks. These findings reveal that current LLMs still lack the high-level reasoning needed for real-world engineering, highlighting the need for future models with deeper and more reliable problem-solving capabilities. Our source code and data are available at https://github.com/AI4Engi/EngiBench.

Abstract:
Japanese Sign Language (JSL) is a low-resource sign language that has received limited attention in the AI research community, primarily due to the lack of large-scale, publicly available parallel corpora. In this work, we introduce J-Shuwa, a large-scale JSL-Japanese parallel corpus constructed from YouTube videos with hard-coded subtitles and closed captions. The corpus contains 197K parallel JSL-Japanese sentence pairs, totaling approximately 300 hours of video, making it the largest publicly available JSL dataset to date. We conduct sign language translation (SLT) experiments by training models on J-Shuwa and evaluating them on the JSL Dialogue Corpus under both zero-shot and fine-tuned settings. Our results demonstrate that J-Shuwa is effective for training SLT models. Beyond SLT, we believe that J-Shuwa can also serve as a valuable resource for future JSL research across a wide range of tasks. The dataset and code are publicly available at: https://github.com/SpaJune/J-Shuwa.

Abstract:
Large language models often struggle to recognize their knowledge limits in closed-book question answering, leading to confident hallucinations. While decomposed prompting is typically used to improve accuracy, we investigate its impact on reliability. We evaluate three task-equivalent prompting regimes: Direct, Assistive, and Incremental, across different model scales and multi-hop QA benchmarks. We find that although accuracy gains from decomposition diminish in frontier models, disagreements between prompting regimes remain highly indicative of potential errors. Because factual knowledge is typically stable while hallucinations are stochastic, cross-regime agreement provides a precise signal of internal uncertainty. We leverage this signal to implement a training-free abstention policy that requires no retrieval or fine-tuning. Our results show that disagreement-based abstention outperforms standard uncertainty baselines as an error detector, improving both F1 and AUROC across settings. This demonstrates that decomposition-based prompting can serve as a practical diagnostic probe for model reliability in closed-book QA.

Abstract:
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle in Taiwanese Mandarin environments due to region-specific orthographic and cultural context. We introduce VisTW, a comprehensive benchmark featuring (i) multiple-choice questions (3,795 academic questions) and (ii) free-form generation evaluation (141 Taiwanese-context free-form pairs). Beyond standard accuracy, we investigate character mixing— the unintended production of Simplified Chinese characters under Taiwanese-Mandarin-style prompts—and propose a human-grounded purity penalty derived from perceptual thresholds measured from users. Our evaluation reveals substantial character contamination (3%–19%) across state-of-the-art VLMs. We find that Gemini-3-Pro significantly outperforms the strongest open-weight baseline, Qwen3 235B MoE, by up to 22 percentage points on dialogue tasks once the purity penalty is applied. These results highlight orthographic consistency as a vital, yet overlooked, dimension for localized multimodal evaluation and deployment.

Abstract:
Existing psychological counseling datasets often suffer from monolithic client personas, insufficient therapeutic depth, and a lack of process controllability. To address these critical limitations, we propose PsyChain , a chain-of-agents framework that evolves static counseling corpora into high-fidelity dialogues through collaborative simulation which explicitly models client personality, stage progression, safety monitoring, and expert supervision. PsyChain involves a Client Profiler that extracts life scenarios and pairs them with psychological personality archetypes to synthesize diverse profiles.To simulate the complete counseling process, five specialized agents—Process Monitor, Client Speaker, Safety Monitor, Counselor Supervisor, and Counselor Speaker—collaborate and interact autonomously at each dialogue turn to ensure therapeutic professionalism and safety.We apply this to construct PsyChainD , a Chinese dataset of 10,456 dialogues featuring systematically diverse client profiles. Extensive evaluation across client side , counselor side and overall quality shows substantial improvements. The model trained on PsyChainD achieves 61-91% win rates against domain-specific baselines in pairwise evaluation and the highest average score in human evaluation, indicating potential for real-world counseling.

Abstract:
Large Language Model (LLM) agents exhibit remarkable conversational and reasoning capabilities but remain constrained by limited context windows and the lack of persistent memory. Recent efforts address these limitations via external memory architectures, often employing graph-based representations, yet most adopt flat, entangled structures that intertwine semantics with topology, leading to redundant representations, unstructured retrieval, and degraded efficiency and accuracy. To resolve these issues, we propose LiCoMemory, an end-to-end agentic memory framework for real-time updating and retrieval, which introduces CogniGraph, a lightweight hierarchical graph that utilizes entities and relations as semantic indexing layers, and employs temporal and hierarchy-aware search with integrated reranking for adaptive and coherent knowledge retrieval. Experiments on long-term dialogue benchmarks, LoCoMo and LongMemEval, show that LiCoMemory not only outperforms established baselines in temporal reasoning, multi-session consistency, and retrieval efficiency, but also notably reduces update latency.

Abstract:
Toxic language includes content that is offensive, abusive, or that promotes harm. Progress in preventing toxic output from large language models (LLMs) is hampered by inconsistent definitions of toxicity. We introduce TRuST, a large-scale dataset that unifies and expands prior resources through a carefully synthesized definition of toxicity, and corresponding annotation scheme. It consists of ∼300k annotations, with high-quality human annotation on ∼11k. To ensure high-quality, we designed a rigorous, multi-stage human annotation process, and evaluated the diversity of the annotators. Then we benchmarked state-of-the-art LLMs and pre-trained models on three tasks: toxicity detection, identification of the target group, and of toxic words. Our results indicate that fine-tuned PLMs outperform LLMs on the three tasks, and that current reasoning models do not reliably improve performance. TRuST constitutes one of the most comprehensive resources for evaluating and mitigating LLM toxicity, and other research in socially-aware and safer language technologies.

Abstract:
Traditional sentence embedding methods employ token-level contrastive learning on non-generative pre-trained models. Recently, there have emerged embedding methods based on generative large language models (LLMs). These methods either rely on fixed prompt templates or involve modifications to the model architecture. The former lacks further optimization of the model and results in limited performance, while the latter alters the internal computational mechanisms of the model, thereby compromising its generative capabilities. We propose SemPA, a novel approach that boosts the sentence representations while preserving the generative ability of LLMs via semantic preference alignment. We leverage sentence-level Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to efficiently optimize LLMs on a paraphrase generation task, where the model learns to discriminate semantically equivalent sentences while preserving inherent generative capacity. Theoretically, we establish a formal connection between DPO and contrastive learning under the Plackett-Luce model framework. Empirically, experimental results on both semantic textual similarity tasks and various benchmarks for LLMs show that SemPA achieves better semantic representations without sacrificing the inherent generation capability of LLMs.

Abstract:
Despite the pivotal role of numerical reasoning as the cornerstone of mathematical capabilities in large language models (LLMs) across applications, few benchmarks evaluate LLMs by integrating numerical processing and mathematical reasoning, hindering the interpretability of failures in math tasks. We introduce PyraMathBench, a comprehensive hierarchical benchmark with 27,215 questions derived from 7,404 math word problems, spanning 4 key cognitive aspects, 14 subcategories, and 2 modalities. Experiments reveal that LLMs’ performance is severely compromised by inadequate numerical computation and weak handling of abstract numerical questions. To address this, we propose the Smart Optimization Learning-based VErsatile module (SOLVE) and Interactive Relative Policy Optimization (IRPO), which enhance LLMs’ numerical-mathematical synergy via efficient tool calls (fuzzy matching and low-quality call rejection). Comparative experiments show Qwen-2.5 achieves a 5.0 score improvement with SOLVE and IRPO training.

Abstract:
Biomedical data-to-text generation aims at generating textual natural language descriptions that can fluently and precisely describe the biomedical structured data. However, biomedical data-to-text generation faces the dilemma of a lack of labeled data due to the privacy and scarcity of medical data. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to solve few-shot tasks through in-context learning (ICL). In this paper, we are the first to explore the performance of different LLMs in the biomedical data-to-text generation task.To address the issues of semantic sparsity and misinterpretation of numerical values in biomedical structured data, we propose an EAG (Enrich, Aggregate, and Generate) framework, a simple but efficient LLM-based three-stage biomedical D2T approach in low-resource scenarios. We conduct extensive evaluations of closed-source general LLMs, open-source general LLMs, and open-source medical LLMs. The results show that the EAG framework provides good interpretability and superior performance, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the BioLeaflets dataset. The code and data will be released at https://github.com/FXLP/EAG.

Abstract:
Benchmarks are often used as a standard to understand LLM capabilities in different domains. However, aggregate benchmark scores provide limited insight into compositional skill gaps of LLMs and how to improve them. To make these weaknesses visible, we propose Scaffolded Task Design (STaD) framework. STaD generates controlled variations of benchmark tasks based on the concept of scaffolding, which introduces structured, incremental support in a step-by-step manner. Rather than inspecting failures individually, this approach enables systematic and scalable probing of model behavior by identifying the specific reasoning skill compositions they lack. Treating the LLM as a black box, our experiments on six models of varying sizes reveal multiple failure points in three reasoning benchmarks and highlight each model’s unique and distinct skill gaps.

Abstract:
We assess LLMs’ constitutional reasoning abilities using three different, newly developed datasets on three different constitutional questions in three different constitutional frameworks, comprising two different languages; the structure and content of the datasets is informed by legal expertise and grounded in the state of the art in philosophy of language. Our results indicate that the 19 LLMs tested, including the reasoning LLMs, while not being uniformly subject to political bias, are still not reliable constitutional reasoners, as they are heavily influenced by logically irrelevant aspects of the reasoning. Of the 196k evaluations run in our main experiment, the LLMs label less than 70% correctly, and open-weight reasoning LLMs as well as gpt-4o are outperformed by moderately sized open-weight non-reasoning LLMs. None of the LLMs tested consistently show slow, systematic, rule-based system 2 thinking.

Abstract:
Deep learning models deployed in clinical settings face two major challenges: domain generalization (DG) and long-tailed (LT) recognition. DG requires learning domain-invariant features to ensure robustness across heterogeneous acquisition protocols and patient populations. However, we identify a fundamental trade-off: objectives that enforce domain invariance often suppress class-discriminative signals essential for long-tailed recognition.To address this, we propose the Agentic Causal Disentanglement (CANDICE) Framework , a modular architecture that integrates explicit clinical expertise from sonographers, radiologists, and specialists as a form of causal intervention. The framework combines clinical reasoning, causal representation learning, and automated pipeline construction to disentangle domain-invariant and class-discriminative features. By incorporating domain-specific causal knowledge, it effectively decouples the objectives of DG and LT learning. We evaluate CANDICE on 10 diverse medical imaging datasets spanning four modalities. The framework achieves an average performance improvement of 10.3% across both multi-domain and in-domain long-tailed tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling distribution shifts while preserving minority class performance.

Abstract:
Systematic reviews are a cornerstone of modern science, synthesising evidence from published research to provide the highest level of research evidence in a field. The process includes categorising studies on a number of different dimensions which is laborious and time consuming. Automatic approaches are beginning to be explored but the complexity of the task means we are currently far from a satisfactory solution. In this paper, we test different annotation scheme-agnostic methods for automatic NLP paper categorisation for systematic reviews, and test them on two tasks: (i) annotating NLP papers for categories of reported controlled-text generation methods, and (ii) annotating NLP papers for categories of reported human evaluations. We find that reasoning-enhanced fine-tuning combined with DAPO reinforcement learning rewarding both correctness and output format substantially improves the performance of LLMs (by up to +53.8 points), even when they have been pre-trained to perform reasoning, and cuts time required for annotation by around 80% in a human-in-the-loop setting.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate, rank, and supervise other models, yet their reliability in judging LLMs’ reasoning process under long-context settings remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks either overly rely on human annotators, who may miss subtle flaws in lengthy reasoning chains, or focus solely on final responses while ignoring the underlying context and reasoning process. We introduce Long-Reason Bench (LRBench), a large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLM-based judges. LRBench comprises over 100K annotated instances spanning medical, legal, and academic-review scenarios, with fine-grained labels indicating violations of six core principles: Logical Correctness, Factual Consistency, Bias and Fairness, Groundedness, Helpfulness, and Harmlessness. Experimental results reveal that state-of-the-art LLM judges struggle to identify nuanced reasoning errors in long contexts. To improve judge reliability, we further present Judge-R1, which combines reinforcement learning with multi-turn search to enable grounded and principle-aware evaluation. Across domains and principles, Judge-R1 consistently outperforms single-turn baselines, enabling scalable and trustworthy evaluation of LLM reasoning. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Xinyi-0724/Judge-R1.

Abstract:
Pretrained biomedical vision–language models (VLMs) such as BioMedCLIP perform well on average but often degrade on challenging modalities where inter-class margins are small and acquisition-specific variations are pronounced, especially under few-shot supervision and when modality priors differ from pretraining corpora substantially. We propose BioVLM, a prompt-learning framework that improves cross-domain generalization without extensive backbone fine-tuning. BioVLM learns a diverse prompt bank and introduces dynamic prompt selection: for each input, it selects the most discriminative prompts via a low-entropy criterion on the predictive distribution, effectively coupling sparse few-shot evidence with rich LLM semantic priors. To strengthen this coupling, we distill high-confidence LLM-derived attributes and enforce robust knowledge transfer through strong/weak augmentation consistency. At test time, BioVLM adapts by choosing modality-appropriate prompts, enabling transfer to unseen categories and domains, while keeping training lightweight and inference efficient. On 11 MedMNIST+ 2D datasets, BioVLM achieves new state of the art across three distinct generalization settings. Codes are available at https://github.com/mainaksingha01/BioVLM.

Abstract:
Mitigating social bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a distinct alignment challenge: unlike verifiable tasks, social bias lacks a single ground truth, creating a high-variance, subjective reward landscape. Previous preference-based fine-tuning methods have major trade-offs: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is limited by the lack of exploration inherent in offline training, while Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) can lead to training instability due to potentially unreliable critic estimates. In this paper, we propose BiasGRPO, an adaptation of Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) that stabilizes alignment by normalizing rewards across a group of sampled completions. By substituting the value function with a group-relative baseline, our approach reduces instability while maintaining the exploration benefits of online reinforcement learning. To adapt GRPO, we curate and synthetically extend a dataset spanning multiple domains and contexts, and create a custom, bias-specific reward model for effectively guiding generation while avoiding knowledge degradation. We find that BiasGRPO outperforms DPO and PPO across multiple benchmarks, indicating its effectiveness as an alignment technique that can overcome the limitations of previous preference-based methods.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often exhibit extreme sensitivity to surface-level prompt variations, where minor lexical perturbations trigger disproportionate performance fluctuations. Moving beyond black-box optimization or coarse-grained templates, we conduct the first analysis of n-gram token-level mechanisms, leveraging a large-scale dataset of 132,000 prompt variants. Our investigation uncovers the Scaling Law of Prompt Performance Stability: higher average performance is inherently associated with lower variance and greater stability. We identify that this robustness is driven by two linguistic pillars: Domain-Specific Terminology, which anchors semantic boundaries, and Explicit Action Directives, which formalize reasoning trajectories. By narrowing the model’s interpretative space, these patterns effectively "lock" the generation process. We operationalize these findings into an automated Prompt-Refining Agent that autonomously restructures queries via domain anchoring and operational constraints. Empirical results show a 40.7% reduction in performance variance for code generation, offering a statistically grounded framework for robust prompt engineering.

Abstract:
Long context large language models exhibit the “lost in the middle” problem, where models struggle to effectively utilize information located in the middle of long contexts. Although existing workflow-based long context methods (e.g., RAG) alleviate this problem and perform well on specific datasets, can their effectiveness generalize to all types of datasets? In this work, we systematically investigate the cross-dataset generalization of long context methods. Our evaluation reveals that these methods are not universally effective. Such substantial performance variability underscores the risks of performance degradation associated with the indiscriminate application of long context methods. We investigated the reason for the failure of long context methods. We found that the intrinsic decomposition mechanisms of long context methods hinder context dependency modeling, causing these methods to suffer performance declines on documents with strong context dependency. To address this issue, We propose CoDaR (Context Dependency-aware Routing), a training-free adaptive routing strategy. By analyzing the context dependency strength of documents, CoDaR adaptively invokes long context methods, thereby significantly enhancing their overall robustness across different types of datasets.

Abstract:
In an era of rampant misinformation, generating reliable news explanations is vital, especially for underrepresented languages like Hindi. Lacking robust automated tools, Hindi faces challenges in scaling misinformation detection. To bridge this gap, we propose DeFactoX, a novel framework integrating Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) with Curriculum learning to align machine-generated explanations with human reasoning. Fact-checked explanations from credible sources serve as preferred responses, while LLM outputs highlight system limitations and serve as non-preferred responses. At the core of this framework lies Hin-DPO, an enhanced variant of DPO that enriches the loss function with two novel parameters, Actuality and Finesse, enhancing explanation quality and consistency. Experiments with LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Gemma) and PLMs (mBART, mT5) confirm the framework’s effectiveness in generating coherent, contextually relevant explanations.

Abstract:
Synthesizing an editable 3D scene from a single RGB image is central to content creation, embodied-agent data generation, and AR/VR, yet remains challenging to achieve both high-fidelity reconstruction and convenient interactive editing. Existing geometry-based pipelines produce high-quality 3D results but are typically hard to refine without rerunning the full process, while LLM-driven procedural systems enable interactive tool use but are mostly text-driven and lack precise metric 3D understanding from images. We present SceneLM, a language-model-based framework that grounds 3D scene synthesis in visual evidence by recovering an executable metric 3D layout directly from a single image. Given an RGB image (and camera intrinsics when available), SceneLM outputs a JSON-form layout specifying each object’s category, 3D center, size, and discretized yaw, and then deterministically executes this layout with a tool suite to instantiate, place, and edit objects for iterative refinement. To train metric layout recovery at scale, we curate five datasets covering diverse indoor, outdoor, and tabletop scenes and convert heterogeneous 3D annotations into a unified instruction-tuning format. To improve numerical stability and metric accuracy while preserving the text interface, we augment autoregressive JSON generation with a lightweight geometry prediction branch and dual supervision. Experiments show that SceneLM substantially improves single-image 3D layout estimation over strong open and proprietary MLLM baselines, and yields higher-quality end-to-end scene generation in geometric consistency, physical plausibility, semantic alignment, and realism.

Abstract:
Improving the Theory of Mind (ToM) capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for effective social interactions between these AI models and humans. However, the existing benchmarks often measure ToM capability improvement through story-reading, multiple-choice questions from a third-person perspective, while ignoring the first-person, dynamic, and open-ended nature of human-AI (HAI) interactions. To directly examine how ToM improvement techniques benefit HAI interactions, we first proposed the new paradigm of interactive ToM evaluation with both perspective and metric shifts. Next, following the paradigm, we conducted a systematic study of four representative ToM enhancement techniques using both four real-world datasets and a user study, covering both goal-oriented tasks (e.g., coding, math) and experience-oriented tasks (e.g., counseling). Our findings reveal that improvements on static benchmarks do not always translate to better performance in dynamic HAI interactions. This paper offers critical insights into ToM evaluation, showing the necessity of interaction-based assessments in developing next-generation, socially aware LLMs for HAI symbiosis.

Abstract:
This work addresses test output prediction, a key challenge in test case generation. To improve the reliability of predicted outputs by LLMs, prior approaches generate code first to ground predictions. One grounding strategy is direct execution of generated code, but even minor errors can cause failures. To address this, we introduce LLM-based pseudocode execution, which grounds prediction on more error-resilient pseudocode and simulates execution via LLM reasoning. We further propose DUET, a dual-execution framework that combines both approaches by functional majority voting. Our analysis shows the two approaches are complementary in overcoming the limitations of direct execution suffering from code errors, and pseudocode reasoning from hallucination. On LiveCodeBench, DUET achieves the state-of-the-art performance, improving Pass@1 by 13.6 pp. For filtering candidates in code generation, DUET shows the best Pass@1 on LiveCodeBenchEasy, BigCodeBench-Hard, DevEval and HumanEval(+).

Abstract:
In the era of big data, access to abundant data is crucial to driving research forward. However, such data are often inaccessible due to privacy concerns or high costs, particularly in the healthcare domain. Generating synthetic (tabular) data can address this, but existing models typically require substantial amounts of data to train effectively, contradicting our objective of solving data scarcity. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework to generate synthetic tabular data, powered by large language models (LLMs) that emulates the architecture of a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). By incorporating the data generation process as contextual information and utilizing LLM as the optimizer, our approach significantly enhances the quality of synthetic data generation in common scenarios with small sample sizes. Our experimental results on public and private datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms several state-of-art models regarding generating higher quality synthetic data for downstream tasks while keeping the privacy of the real data in low data regime. Code is available at https://github.com/yling1105/MALLM-GAN.

Abstract:
As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed, ensuring their safe use is paramount. Jailbreaking, adversarial prompts that bypass model alignment to trigger harmful outputs, present significant risks, with existing studies reporting high success rates in evading common LLMs. However, previous evaluations have focused solely on the models, neglecting the full deployment pipeline, which typically incorporates additional safety mechanisms like content moderation filters. To address this gap, we present a systematic evaluation of jailbreak attacks targeting LLM safety alignment, assessing their success across the full inference pipeline, including both input and output filtering stages. Our findings yield two key insights: first, nearly all evaluated jailbreak techniques can be detected by at least one safety filter, suggesting that prior assessments may have overestimated the practical success of these attacks; second, while safety filters are effective in detection, there remains room to better balance recall and precision to further optimize protection and user experience.We highlight critical gaps and call for further refinement of detection accuracy and usability in LLM safety systems.

Abstract:
In ancient China, a variety of datasets depicted humanistic scenes, geographical features, and plants. However, these datasets, compiled long ago, often contain errors, lack comprehensiveness, and are inconsistent with modern realities. To meet current demands, we aim to expand and improve ancient datasets using large language model. Focusing on the Great Compendium of Myriad Flowers, an invaluable ancient plants dataset, we gather information on numerous previously excluded plants, carefully select and organize classical Chinese poetry and prose, and construct a comprehensive botanical encyclopedia knowledge system. Additionally, we collect ancient paintings and modern photographs of plants to enrich the dataset. Furthermore, we propose a novel multi-modal plant classification model designed to integrate multi-modal information from both classical and contemporary sources, enabling the extraction of plant-related information from classical Chinese poetry and prose. Extensive experiments demonstrate the importance of the proposed new ancient plants dataset, and also indicate the effectiveness of our proposed multi-modal plant classification model.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly rely on external tools to complete complex tasks, yet their ability to recognize and correct their own tool-use mistakes remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate planning and execution success, overlooking the self-reflective dimension of tool use. To address this gap, we present ReflecTool-Bench, the first benchmark designed to assess LLMs’ self-reflective reasoning in tool-augmented multi-turn dialogues. ReflecTool-Bench covers 10 domains with 88 distinct APIs and 968 annotated dialogues, systematically injecting diverse error types arising from both user and assistant behavior. The benchmark defines two complementary evaluation setups: the Critique task, where models diagnose errors in third-party dialogues, and the Self-Reflection Task, where models must detect and repair their own prior tool-use mistakes. We introduce fine-grained metrics for error detection, error classification, correction accuracy, and explanation quality, enabling a holistic assessment of reflective reasoning. Evaluations across 12 state-of-the-art models, including both API-based closed source models and open source models, reveal that while models can reliably identify user-originated errors, they struggle with assistant-originated ones, and performance drops sharply when moving from critique to self-reflection.

Abstract:
Automatically generating 3D games in commercial game engines remains a non-trivial challenge, as it involves complex engine-related workflows for generating assets such as scenes, blueprints, and code. To address this challenge, we propose a novel multi-agent system, AutoUE, which coordinates multiple agents to end-to-end generate 3D games, covering model retrieval, scene generation, gameplay and interaction code synthesis, and automated game testing for evaluation. In order to mitigate tool-use hallucinations in LLMs, we introduce a retrieval-augmented generation mechanism that grounds agents with relevant UE tool documentation. Additionally, we incorporate game design patterns and engine constraints into the code generation process to ensure the generation of correct and robust code. Furthermore, we design an automated play-testing pipeline that generates and executes runtime test commands, enabling systematic evaluation of dynamic behaviors. Finally, we construct a game generation dataset and conduct a series of experiments that demonstrate AutoUE’s ability to generate 3D games end-to-end, and validate the effectiveness of these designs.

Abstract:
End-to-end spoken dialogue models have garnered significant attention because they offer a higher potential ceiling in expressiveness and perceptual ability than cascaded systems. However, the intelligence and expressiveness of current open-source spoken dialogue models often remain below expectations. Motivated by the success of online reinforcement learning(RL) in other domains, one might attempt to directly apply preference optimization to spoken dialogue models, yet this transfer is non-trivial. We analyze these obstacles from the perspectives of reward modeling and rollout sampling, focusing on how sparse preference supervision interacts with dense speech generation under shared-parameter updates. Based on the analysis, we propose a modality-aware adaptive post-training recipe that makes RL practical for spoken dialogue: it constrains preference updates to the semantic channel and improves acoustic behavior via explicit anchoring, while dynamically regulating their mixture from rollout statistics to avoid unreliable preference gradients. We evaluate the method across multiple spoken dialogue benchmarks and representative architectures, and observe consistent improvements in semantic quality and speech expressiveness.

Abstract:
Lossless compression has made significant advancements in Genomics Data (GD) storage, sharing and management. Current learning-based methods are non-evolvable with problems of low-level compression modeling, limited adaptability, and user-unfriendly interface. To this end, we propose AgentGC, the first evolutionary Agent-based GD Compressor, consisting of 3 layers with multi-agent named Leader and Worker. Specifically, the 1) User layer provides a user-friendly interface via Leader combined with LLM; 2) Cognitive layer, driven by the Leader, integrates LLM to consider joint optimization of algorithm-dataset-system, addressing the issues of low-level modeling and limited adaptability; and 3) Compression layer, headed by Worker, performs compression decompression via a automated multi-knowledge learning-based compression framework. On top of AgentGC, we design 3 modes to support diverse scenarios: CP for compression-ratio priority, TP for throughput priority, and BM for balanced mode. Compared with 14 baselines on 9 datasets, the average compression ratios gains are 16.66%, 16.11%, and 16.33%, the throughput gains are 4.73x, 9.23x, and 9.15x, respectively.

Abstract:
Universal Multimodal Retrieval (UMR) aims to map different modalities (e.g., visual and textual) into a shared embedding space for multi-modal retrieval. Existing UMR methods can be broadly divided into two categories: early-fusion approaches, such as Marvel, which projects visual features into the language model (LM) space for integrating with text modality, and late-fusion approaches, such as UniVL-DR, encode visual and textual inputs using separate encoders and obtain fused embeddings through addition. Our pilot study reveals that Marvel exhibits visual modality collapse, which is characterized by the model’s tendency to disregard visual features while depending excessively on textual cues. In contrast, although UniVL-DR is less affected by this issue, it is more susceptible to semantic misalignment, where semantically related content is positioned far apart in the embedding space. To address these challenges, we propose MiMIC, which introduces two key innovations: (1) a fusion-in-decoder architecture for effective multimodal integration, and (2) robust training through single-modality mix-in and random caption dropout. Experiments on the WebQA+ and EVQA+ datasets—where image in documents or queries might lack captions—indicate that MiMIC consistently outperforms both early- and late-fusion baselines.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for realistic financial analysis over financial documents. However, existing benchmarks fail to capture realistic financial analysis settings that involve cross-document retrieval, multi-page evidence integration, and diverse analytical tasks. To address this gap, we introduce FinMRAGBench , a comprehensive multi-modal financial RAG benchmark in which most questions require retrieving evidence scattered across multiple pages and documents, constructed from large-scale real-world annual reports and comprising 887 expert-verified QA pairs spanning five representative financial analysis tasks. Moreover, we introduce FinMRAGAgent , an agent trained on high-quality agentic trajectories following the reasoning-and-acting (ReAct) paradigm, capable of dynamic tool invocation and multi-step financial analysis. Our extensive experiments show that current multi-modal RAG systems still struggle with incomplete retrieval and complex financial reasoning. In contrast, FinMRAGAgent achieves the strongest overall performance across all models, demonstrating that our structured reasoning approach significantly enhances multi-modal RAG in realistic financial scenarios. The code and data are available at https://github.com/sqyangit/FinMRAGBench.

Abstract:
Safeguard models help large language models (LLMs) detect and block harmful content, but most evaluations remain English-centric and overlook linguistic and cultural diversity. Existing multilingual safety benchmarks often rely on machine-translated English data, which fails to capture nuances in low-resource languages. Southeast Asian (SEA) languages are underrepresented despite the region’s linguistic diversity and unique safety concerns, from culturally sensitive political speech to region-specific misinformation. Addressing these gaps requires benchmarks that are natively authored to reflect local norms and harm scenarios. We introduce SEA-SafeguardBench, the first human-verified safety benchmark for SEA, covering eight languages, 21,640 samples, across three subsets: general, in-the-wild, and content generation. The experimental results from our benchmark demonstrate that even state-of-the-art LLMs and guardrails are challenged by SEA cultural and harm scenarios and underperform when compared to English texts.

Abstract:
The autoregressive inference in large language models requires repeated computation across transformer layers. While caching intermediate key-value (KV) pairs eliminates redundancy, it introduces severe memory overhead, particularly in long-context settings. Most existing cache compression methods operate solely on either quantization or eviction, based on importance estimation of cached data. However, they are limited by coarse compression choices and inaccurate importance assessment, leading to suboptimal inference quality. To address this, we propose HqeKV, a hybrid compression framework built on both quantization and eviction, offering finer-grained compression options that adapt smoothly to the varying importance of cached KV pairs. An integrated optimizer automatically selects the best compression action for each cached element, maximizing quality while insulating end-users from tedious low-level tuning details. We further design a joint K–V importance metric to provide more accurate importance assessment results so that the optimizer can make smarter decisions. Additionally, HqeKV supports flexible conversion policies across multiple quantization precision levels, to further reduce quality degradation. Extensive experiments show that HqeKV improves output quality under the same memory constraints, outperforming state-of-the-art alternatives. Code is available at https://github.com/skywclouds/HqeKV.

Abstract:
Evaluating code large language models (Code LLMs) requires reliable detection of data leakage, where benchmark performance is artificially inflated by exposure to benchmark data during pre-training. Existing approaches either assume access to proprietary training corpora, rely on brittle heuristics such as timestamp filtering, or use external reference sets with manually tuned, non-generalizable thresholds. To address these limitations, we introduce SrDetection , a unified s elf- r eferential leakage detection framework for both gray-box (access to model logits) and black-box (access to model outputs) settings. SrDetection generates semantically equivalent variants of a benchmark sample and detects leakage by contrasting the model’s behavior on the original versus its variants, flagging cases where the original is disproportionately easier for the model. We further design a controlled leakage detection testbed and evaluate SrDetection in this environment. Across different models and training stages, SrDetection improves average F1 by 21.52 points in the gray-box setting and 14.46 points in the black-box setting over strong baselines, demonstrating robust, threshold-independent leakage detection. Finally, a gray-box study of 15 widely used Code LLMs on four popular benchmarks reveals benchmark-specific leakage patterns beyond prior overlap-based analyses[Source code and data are available at ].

Abstract:
Temporal Knowledge Graph (TKG) forecasting faces significant challenges due to distribution shifts and poor inductive generalization in parametric models. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer potent semantic reasoning, existing LLM-based approaches struggle with implicit modality alignment and suboptimal graph linearization, failing to capture complex topologies without retraining. To bridge this gap, we propose ExE-LLM, a training-free, test-time adaptive framework that reframes TKG prediction as explicit evidence-driven reasoning. Our core philosophy is to decouple topological calculation from semantic reasoning: a heuristic module translates latent graph signals into natural language evidence, enabling the LLM to perform multi-source judgment. ExE-LLM incorporates a task-aware scheduler for test-time adaptation, a heuristic synthesizer for explicit modality alignment, and a self-diagnosis module for iterative optimization. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that ExE-LLM achieves SOTA performance in inductive settings, significantly outperforming fully trained graph neural networks without updating LLM parameters. The source code is available at https://github.com/JENLISA4EVER/ExE-LLM.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to personalized education systems, particularly in the realm of student behavior simulation. By predicting fine-grained learning behaviors, these simulations enable intelligent systems to provide tailored instructional support. However, most existing methods rely on a single high-capacity LLM to represent an entire population of diverse learners. In this work, we demonstrate that this “one-size-fits-all” approach induces a systematic ability-dependent bias, where high-capacity models tend to overestimate low-ability students while lower-capacity models underestimate high-ability ones. To mitigate this distortion, we propose an ability-aware student simulation framework that dynamically matches students with appropriate LLM backbones through cognitive alignment. We leverage Neural Cognitive Diagnosis (NeuralCD) to extract multidimensional cognitive profiles for both human students and LLM agents within a shared skill space, subsequently pairing each student with the most cognitively representative model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach substantially reduces simulation bias and consistently outperforms single-model baselines across the entire proficiency spectrum. Our findings suggest that faithful behavior simulation necessitates the alignment of model capacity with student ability, establishing cognitive diagnosis as a principled mechanism for model assignment in educational AI.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly studied as repositories of linguistic knowledge. In this line of work, models are commonly evaluated both as generators of language and as judges of linguistic output, yet these two roles are rarely examined in direct relation to one another. As a result, it remains unclear whether success in one role aligns with success in the other. In this paper, we address this question for pragmatic competence by comparing LLMs’ performance as pragmatic listeners, judging the appropriateness of linguistic outputs, and as pragmatic speakers, generating pragmatically appropriate language. We evaluate multiple open-weight and proprietary LLMs across three pragmatic settings. We find a robust asymmetry between pragmatic evaluation and pragmatic generation: many models perform substantially better as listeners than as speakers. Our results suggest that pragmatic judging and pragmatic generation are only weakly aligned in current LLMs, calling for more integrated evaluation practices.

Abstract:
Leveraging Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to accelerate frontier scientific research is promising, yet how to rigorously evaluate such systems remains unclear. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on single-document understanding, whereas real scientific workflows require integrating evidence from multiple papers, including their text, tables, and figures. As a result, multi-modal, multi-document scientific reasoning remains underexplored and lacks systematic evaluation. To address this gap, we introduce PaperScope, a multi-modal multi-document benchmark designed for agentic deep research. PaperScope presents three advantages: (1) Structured scientific grounding. It is built on a knowledge graph of over 2,000 AI papers spanning three years, providing a structured foundation for research-oriented queries. (2) Semantically dense evidence construction. It integrates semantically related key information nodes and employs optimized random-walk article selector to sample thematically coherent paper sets, thereby ensuring adequate semantic density and task complexity. (3) Multi-task evaluation of scientific reasoning. It contains over 2,000 QA pairs across reasoning, retrieval, summarization, and problem solving, enabling evaluation of multi-step scientific reasoning. Experimental results show that even advanced systems such as OpenAI Deep Research and Tongyi Deep Research achieve limited scores on PaperScope, highlighting the difficulty of long-context retrieval and deep multi-source reasoning. PaperScope thus provides a rigorous benchmark alongside a scalable pipeline for constructing large-scale multi-modal, multi-source deep research datasets.

Abstract:
Previous research has shown that LLMs finetuned on incorrect completions within narrow domains ( e.g. , insecure code or incorrect medical advice) can become broadly misaligned to exhibit harmful behaviors, which is called emergent misalignment . In this work, we investigate whether this phenomenon can extend beyond safety behaviors to a broader spectrum of dishonesty and deception under high-stakes scenarios ( e.g. , lying under pressure and deceptive behavior). To explore this, we finetune open-sourced LLMs on misaligned completions across diverse domains. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs show broadly misaligned behavior in dishonesty. Additionally, we further explore this phenomenon in a downstream combined finetuning setting, and find that introducing as little as 1% of misalignment data into a standard downstream task is sufficient to decrease honest behavior over 20%. Furthermore, we consider a more practical human-AI interaction environment where we simulate both benign and biased users to interact with the assistant LLM. Furthermore, we simulate both benign and biased users to interact with the assistant LLM, producing 20k trajectories for self-training in a more practical human-AI interaction environment. Notably, we find that the assistant model can be misaligned unintentionally to exacerbate its dishonesty with only 10% biased user population. In summary, we extend the study of emergent misalignment to the domain of dishonesty under high-stakes scenarios, and highlight that this risk arises not only through direct finetuning, but also in downstream mixture tasks and human-AI interactions.

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) in abstract reasoning tasks, they continue to struggle with physics problem solving due to difficulties in decoding implicit constraints and maintaining physical consistency. To address these challenges, Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a promising approach to verify intermediate reasoning steps. Existing PRMs attempt to mitigate reasoning errors but typically rely on scalar scoring, which lacks the explanatory power necessary to diagnose complex physical misconceptions. In this work, we introduce PhysPRM , a Generative PRM that treats evaluation as a generative task to produce fine-grained diagnoses comprising critiques, final judgments, and specific error types. To facilitate this, we develop an automated data synthesis pipeline to construct PhysPRM30K, a comprehensive training dataset, and PhysProcessBench, a rigorously human-verified benchmark. By employing a two-stage training paradigm that integrates Supervised Fine-Tuning with Group Relative Policy Optimization, PhysPRM significantly enhances the physics reasoning capabilities of various LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PhysPRM improves performance across seven benchmarks in both Best-of-N and critique refinement strategies.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as interactive social agents, yet their ability to maintain coherent and authentic persona-level role-playing remains limited, particularly in realistic social scenarios. Existing research predominantly focuses on character-level settings and relies on static evaluation formats, failing to capture the complexity of everyday social interactions. In this work, we present PersonaArena, a dynamic simulation framework for evaluating and improving persona-level role-playing in LLMs. PersonaArena leverages a large, filtered corpus of user-generated social content to construct a nuanced persona bank, and elicits multi-turn, context-rich interactions within simulated social environments. Our framework features a multi-agent debating judge for holistic and unbiased assessment. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that PersonaArena enables rigorous evaluation and enhancement of LLMs’ role-playing capabilities, advancing the development of more authentic and socially adept AI agents. Our codes and long appendix are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/PersonaArena-B323/.

Abstract:
Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting makes language models write step-by-step explanations, but these steps may not match what the model actually used to choose its answer. Existing faithfulness checks often only test whether changing the written chain changes the answer, without verifying whether the steps are truly supported by the given evidence, or they require special prompts that do not generalize well. We present NSF-CoT , a neuro-symbolic formal verification method that checks CoT faithfulness step by step for contextual question answering. NSF-CoT (1) converts the provided context facts and each reasoning step into simple logical statements, (2) uses counterfactual attribution to estimate which context facts the model relied on while generating each step, and (3) verifies each step using a hybrid checker that combines an SMT solver with an LLM-based entailment judge. For every step, we score groundedness (supported by the full context), validity (supported by the facts the model relied on), and utility (helps reach the final answer), and combine them into a faithfulness score. Across OpenBookQA, QASC, and HotpotQA, NSF-CoT consistently outperforms causal mediation, perturbation probes, and behavioral monitoring, and it identifies reasoning steps that are not only unfaithful but also harmful to the model’s final decision.

Abstract:
Knowledge editing methods such as ROME and MEMIT update factual associations in transformer models by modifying MLP weights. While evaluated mainly by output behavior, their internal mechanism remains underexplored. We investigate whether edits rely on a common mechanism, regardless of which fact is modified. Despite fact-specific weight changes, we argue that ROME and MEMIT target the same subset of weights critical for maintaining edits. To isolate this subset, we train a compact binary mask over the edited weights. The mask reverses 80% of edits on the training set and over 70% on the test set, confirming that diverse edits share a common functional structure. Our analysis reveals that the mask reverses edits by eliminating overattention in later layers. Additionally, we show that injecting the mask during editing drops editing success from 98% to 38%, demonstrating that this mechanism is necessary for edits to succeed. Our finding that edits suppress rather than overwrite knowledge explains why ROME and MEMIT fail to propagate changes to related facts. The identified common functional subspace informs detection and defense against unwanted edits.

Abstract:
Large vision–language model (LVLM)-based web agents are emerging as powerful automation tools but face severe security risks in real-world deployment. Existing benchmarks offer limited coverage, typically isolating user-level prompts from environmental threats, thus failing to capture the full spectrum of vulnerabilities. To address this, we present SecureWebArena, the first holistic security benchmark for web agents. SecureWebArena features a unified suite of six realistic web environments with 2,970 adversarial trajectories, covering a structured taxonomy of six attack vectors that span both user-level and environment-level manipulations. Crucially, we introduce a multi-layered evaluation protocol that dissects agent failures across internal reasoning, behavioral execution, and task outcomes, enabling fine-grained risk analysis beyond simple success metrics. Experiments on 9 representative LVLMs reveal universal vulnerabilities to subtle manipulations and uncover significant trade-offs between model specialization and security. SecureWebArena establishes a rigorous foundation for advancing the development of trustworthy web agents.

Abstract:
The rapid spread of hateful videos online has sparked growing social concerns, driving research efforts to detect and limit their dissemination. However, existing methods rely on opaque models that offer no insight into their decisions, eroding trust in detection systems. Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) provide a compelling alternative, thanks to their ability to generate free-text explanations for multimodal content. Yet, their high computational demands and pronounced bias toward benign predictions limit their practicality. We introduce LEAF, the first Lightweight, Explainable hAteful video detection Framework. At its core, LEAF distills the "explainability" from LMMs into efficient Smaller Multimodal Models (SMMs) through a controlled, de-biasing process, enabling lightweight yet interpretable Hateful Video Detection (HVD). We achieve this with a novel Self-Grounding Chain-of-Thought mechanism that guides LMMs to generate high-quality, unbiased explanatory supervision signals for videos. These signals then progressively train the SMM via a new Stage-Wise Distillation paradigm, resulting in faithful, human-readable natural language explanations for HVD. Extensive experiments on three video benchmarks demonstrate that LEAF not only outperforms prior methods in detection accuracy but also provides strong explainability — all with a lightweight design.

Abstract:
Conversational agents deployed in industrial-scale official account platforms must generate responses that are both contextually grounded and stylistically aligned—requirements that existing methods struggle to meet. Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting induces significant latency due to multi-turn reasoning; per-account fine-tuning is computationally prohibitive; and long prompt-based methods degrade the model’s ability to grasp injected context and style. In this paper, we propose WeStar, a lite-adaptive framework for stylized contextual question answering that scales to millions of official accounts. Our contributions are fourfold: (1) We introduce WeStar, a unified framework capable of serving large volumes of official accounts with minimal overhead. (2) We propose a multi-dimensional, cluster-based parameter sharing scheme that enables compact style representation while preserving stylistic diversity. (3) We develop a style-enhanced Direct Preference Optimization (SeDPO) method to optimize each style cluster’s parameters for improved generation quality. (4) Experiments on a large-scale industrial dataset validate the effectiveness and efficiency of WeStar, underscoring its pracitical value in real-world deployment.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong generalization capabilities but remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that induce restricted text or malicious code generation.Recent structured jailbreaks embed adversarial intent into code-like templates and have demonstrated promising effectiveness.However, existing approaches typically operate within a fixed template design and a single programming language, without considering language diversity or adaptive template evolution, thereby limiting the exploration of cross-language jailbreak behaviors.In this paper, we present MultiCodeAttack, a structured jailbreak framework that systematically explores and optimizes multi-language code templates.MultiCodeAttack maintains a diverse template library across programming languages, dynamically selects languages with higher attack effectiveness via a multi-armed bandit strategy, and evolves templates through semantic-preserving mutation guided by response-aware signals.Extensive experiments on 8 LLMs show that MultiCodeAttack outperforms existing jailbreak baselines, achieving 28.23%–832.59% higher harmful text generation.On malicious code generation across 11 LLMs, MultiCodeAttack produces up to 136.22% more malicious outputs than the baseline methods.Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MultiCodeAttack/.

Abstract:
LVLMs have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities but remain prone to hallucinations, producing outputs inconsistent with visual inputs or user instructions. Existing training-free methods, including contrastive decoding and auxiliary expert models, which incur several times more computational overhead and may introduce potential interference, as well as static internal signal enhancement, are often vulnerable to the attention sink phenomenon. We find that internal Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD) in LVLMs naturally reveal semantically core visual regions under the distortions of attention sinks. Based on this, we propose Positive Attention Dynamics Enhancement (PADE), a training-free attention intervention that constructs a PAD map to identify semantically core visual regions, applies per-head Median Absolute Deviation Scaling to adaptively control the intervention strength, and leverages System-Token Compensation to maintain attention to complex user instructions and support long-term output consistency. Experiments on multiple LVLMs and benchmarks show that PADE improves visual grounding and reduces hallucinations, validating the effectiveness of leveraging internal attention dynamics for reliable multimodal reasoning.

Abstract:
The growth of complex data fuels demand for automated insight discovery. While LLMs and agent technologies have advanced data analysis, existing methods struggle with maintaining contextual coherence, limited coverage due to single-path exploration, and rigid planning that fails to adapt to dynamic data discovery. We propose DataSeer, a collaborative multi-agent framework for automated insight discovery. Our first contribution is a Manager-Centric Collaborative Framework , where the Manager ensures cross-episode contextual coherence through a dual-layer memory system with compression, consolidation, and retrieval, alongside dynamic prompt editing, coordinating the overall process between the Planner and Executor. Second, we optimize the planning and execution components : the Planner employs multi-role discussion for adaptive sub-goal generation and plan refinement; the Executor is endowed with tactical autonomy for exploratory execution and incorporates real-time multi-dimensional self-assessment to guarantee insight quality. Third, we design Multi-Branch Reasoning that executes multiple discovery trajectories and synthesizes outcomes through LLM-based aggregation, improving coverage and reducing single-path stochasticity. Experiments on InsightBench and InsightEval show that DataSeer outperforms baselines, achieving improvements of 18.7% and 12.1% in insight-level scores, and 11.6% and 10.3% in summary-level scores, respectively.

Abstract:
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred interest in neuro-symbolic methods for logical reasoning based on auto-formalization, where LLMs first formalize problems into symbolic programs, for solvers to perform reasoning over.However, existing auto-formalization methods remain prone to both syntactic and semantic errors.Specifically, the absence of a program-level semantic verification mechanism leaves semantic errors largely unaddressed.In this paper, we propose a novel approach to semantic error correction via program preference retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).First, we conduct an in-depth analysis of semantic error patterns, and then automatically synthesize SemanticPref , a program preference dataset to model these patterns. Using the dataset as the knowledge base, we introduce PrefRAG , a general RAG framework for refinement in auto-formalization, which enables LLMs to detect and repair syntactic and semantic errors[].Extensive evaluations across both in-distribution (ID) benchmarks (i.e., AR-LSAT and FOLIO) and out-of-distribution (OOD) datasets show that PrefRAG consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving an average accuracy improvement of 2.39% on ID and 6.23% on OOD datasets.

Abstract:
Dynamic Retrieval-Augmented Generation adaptively determines when to retrieve during generation to mitigate hallucinations in large language models (LLMs). However, existing methods rely on model-internal signals (e.g., logits, entropy), which are fundamentally unreliable because LLMs are typically ill-calibrated and often exhibit high confidence in erroneous outputs. We propose QuCo-RAG, which shifts from subjective confidence to objective statistics computed from pre-training data. Our method quantifies uncertainty through two stages: (1) before generation, we identify low-frequency entities indicating long-tail knowledge gaps; (2) during generation, we verify entity co-occurrence in the pre-training corpus, where zero co-occurrence often signals hallucination risk. Both stages leverage Infini-gram for millisecond-latency queries over 4 trillion tokens, triggering retrieval when uncertainty is high. Experiments on multi-hop QA benchmarks show QuCo-RAG achieves EM gains of 5–12 points over state-of-the-art baselines with OLMo-2 models, and transfers effectively to models with undisclosed pre-training data (Llama-3, Qwen2.5, GPT-4.1/5-chat), improving EM by up to 14 points. Generalization to long-form generation and biomedical QA further validates the robustness of our paradigm. These results establish corpus-grounded verification as a principled, practically model-agnostic paradigm for dynamic RAG.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate narrative content, including children’s stories, which play an important role in social and cultural learning. Despite growing interest in AI safety and alignment, most existing evaluations focus primarily on English, leaving the cross-lingual generalization of aligned behavior underexplored. In this work, we introduce BiasedTales-ML, a large-scale parallel corpus of approximately 350,000 children’s stories generated across eight typologically and culturally diverse languages using a full-permutation prompting design. We propose a structured generator-extractor pipeline and a multi-dimensional distributional analysis framework to examine how narrative attributes vary across languages, models, and social conditions.Our analysis reveals substantial cross-lingual variability in narrative generation patterns, indicating that distributions observed in English do not always exhibit similar characteristics in other languages, particularly in lower-resource settings. At the narrative level, we identify recurring structural patterns involving character roles, settings, and thematic emphasis, which manifest differently across linguistic contexts.These findings highlight the limitations of English-centric evaluation for characterizing socially grounded narrative generation in multilingual settings. We release the dataset, code, and an interactive visualization tool to support future research on multilingual narrative analysis and evaluation.

Abstract:
Multi-modal Knowledge Graph Completion (MKGC) aims to infer missing links in multimodal knowledge graphs by leveraging structured triples together with auxiliary modalities such as text and images. Existing MKGC methods typically train with all modalities available, implicitly assuming consistent complementarity; however, this practice often induces modality dependence and modality competition under heterogeneous noise, which can hinder robust multi-modal fusion and limit overall performance.To address these issues, we propose MDBGF, a Modality Dropout and Bidirectional Gated Fusion framework for MKGC. MDBGF introduces a dynamic, probability-based modality dropout schedule. When the dropout is activated, MDBGF drops either the textual or visual modality during training while always preserving the structural information, encouraging the model to reduce over-reliance on any single auxiliary modality and to learn complementary cues under missing-modality conditions. When the dropout is not activated (i.e., all modalities are present), we further design a bidirectional gated fusion mechanism that enables mutual modulation between textual and visual modalities, enhancing cross-modal interaction and flexible fusion. In addition, we propose an adaptive proportional hybrid negative sampling strategy to strengthen MDBGF’s discriminative ability on hard negatives. Experiments on three benchmarks show that MDBGF consistently outperforms existing baselines and achieves new state-of-the-art results. Our code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MDBGF-AHNS.

Abstract:
Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) used in diabetes care collect rich personal health data that could improve day-to-day self-management. However, current patient platforms only offer static summaries which do not support inquisitive user queries. Large language models (LLMs) could enable free-form inquiries about continuous glucose data, but deploying them over sensitive health records raises privacy and accuracy concerns. In this paper, we present CGM-Agent, a privacy-preserving framework for question answering over personal glucose data. In our design, the LLM serves purely as a reasoning engine that selects analytical functions. All computation occurs locally, and personal health data never leaves the user’s device. For evaluation, we construct a benchmark of 4,180 questions combining parameterized question templates with real user queries and ground truth derived from deterministic program execution. Evaluating 6 leading LLMs, we find that top models achieve 94% value accuracy on synthetic queries and 88% on ambiguous real-world queries. Errors stem primarily from intent and temporal ambiguity rather than computational failures. Additionally, lightweight models achieve competitive performance in our agent design, suggesting opportunities for low-cost deployment. We release our code and benchmark to support future work on trustworthy health agents.

Abstract:
Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) achieve superior multimodal reasoning but inevitably expand the safety attack surface. While recent studies have explored emoji-based vulnerabilities, they predominantly focus on textual tokenization artifacts and neglect the model’s intrinsic capability to interpret visual semantics. In this paper, we reveal a critical systemic vulnerability termed the Mismatch between Implicit Semantic Reconstruction and Explicit Safety Alignment. We observe that LVLMs can implicitly synthesize holistic malicious semantics from fragmented visual cues, whereas existing guardrails fail to intercept such latent intent. To exploit this, we propose the Emoji Chain Hinting Attack (ECHA), a visual typography framework that decouples sensitive concepts into semantically related emoji chains and structural text masks. By utilizing benign scenario-based prompts to guide the decoding process, ECHA induces the model to internally reconstruct prohibited intent from abstract visual symbols, effectively bypassing surface-level safety detection. We conduct extensive red-teaming evaluations on seven state-of-the-art (SOTA) LVLMs, comprising proprietary systems such as GPT-4.1-Nano, GPT-4o-Mini, and Gemini-2.5-Flash, alongside open-source models including Qwen2.5-VL, Qwen3-VL, InternVL-3.5, and LLaVA-NeXT. Experimental results demonstrate that ECHA significantly outperforms existing baselines, successfully bypassing safety guardrails in over 81% of instances with a single attempt. Our code is available at https://github.com/KerryZack/ECHA.

Abstract:
Clinical dialogue systems are increasingly vital for patient education and follow-up care; however, effective responses often depend on the clinical context that patients often fail to provide in detail. Responding directly to vague messages can therefore lead to generic or clinically misaligned advice, a challenge that is particularly pronounced in post-op oral cancer (OC) care due to speech impairment and functional limitations. Moreover, post-op OC patients often experience psychological distress, making safety-aware language more likely to arise in dialogue. Dialogue systems in this setting must therefore address both clarifying missing clinical context and ensuring psychological safety. We propose a safety-aware dialogue system that applies information-gain guided clarification before RAG-based response generation and screens user utterances for emotional distress and suicidal ideation. Expert evaluations show that the proposed system improves the quality and clinical appropriateness of generated responses relative to strong baselines, while the safety module closely aligns with expert judgments on clinically concerning utterances. Furthermore, we release a clinically curated Chinese post-op OC QA dataset with expert-validated annotations, which we use throughout our experiments.

Abstract:
Agentic Reinforcement Learning (RL) shows promise for complex tasks, but Text-to-SQL remains mostly restricted to single-turn paradigms. A primary bottleneck is the credit assignment problem. In traditional paradigms, rewards are determined solely by the final-turn feedback, which ignores the intermediate process and leads to ambiguous credit evaluation. To address this, we propose Agentic SQL, a framework featuring a universal two-tiered reward mechanism designed to provide effective trajectory-level evaluation and dense step-level signals. First, we introduce Aggregated Trajectory Reward (ATR) to resolve multi-turn credit assignment. Using an asymmetric transition matrix, ATR aggregates process-oriented scores to incentivize continuous improvement. Leveraging Lyapunov stability theory, we prove ATR acts as an energy dissipation operator, guaranteeing a cycle-free policy and monotonic convergence. Second, Column-Set Matching Reward (CSMR) provides immediate step-level rewards to mitigate sparsity. By executing queries at each turn, CSMR converts binary (0/1) feedback into dense [0,1] signals based on partial correctness. Evaluations on BIRD show a 5% gain over binary-reward GRPO. Notably, our approach outperforms SOTA Arctic-Text2SQL-R1-7B on BIRD and Spider 2.0 using identical models, propelling Text-to-SQL toward a robust multi-turn agent paradigm.

Abstract:
ArkTS is the primary programming language for Huawei’s HarmonyOS ecosystem, which has expanded across smartphones, tablets, and IoT devices. While large language models have demonstrated strong code generation capabilities for mainstream languages, their performance on ArkTS remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce ArkRepoBench, the first repository-level code completion benchmark for ArkTS to our knowledge, 7,519 samples from 20 official HarmonyOS repositories. The benchmark covers multiple difficulty levels and further categorizes completion instances into Single-File, Cross-File Independent, and Cross-File Dependent settings based on dependency analysis, distinguishing the mere presence of cross-file context from its actual necessity. Our experiments show that: (1) ArkTS completion consistently underperforms mainstream languages under our experimental settings, suggesting language-specific challenges associated with this emerging language; (2) open-source 7B models achieve performance comparable to close-source models; (3) cross-file context is a double-edged sword, with sparse retrieval(Jaccard) outperforming dense methods on ArkTS; and (4) HarmonyOS API documentation consistently improves performance, suggesting the benefits of domain-specific enhancements in low-resource settings.

Abstract:
Automatic evaluation is crucial yet challenging for open-ended natural language generation, especially when rule-based metrics are infeasible. Compared with traditional methods, the recent LLM-as-a-Judge paradigms enable better and more flexible evaluation, and show promise as generative reward models for reinforcement learning. However, prior work has revealed a notable gap between their seemingly impressive benchmark performance and actual effectiveness in RL practice. We attribute this issue to some limitations in existing studies, including the dominance of pairwise evaluation and inadequate optimization of evaluation criteria. Therefore, we propose CE-RM-4B, a pointwise generative reward model trained with a dedicated two-stage rollout method, and adopting unified query-based criteria. Using only about 5.7K high-quality data curated from the open-source preference dataset, our CE-RM-4B achieves superior performance on diverse reward model benchmarks, especially in Best-of-N scenarios, and delivers more effective improvements in downstream RL practice.

Abstract:
Multimodal Emotion Recognition (MER) is critical for interpreting real-world interactions. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) have shown promise in MER, their internal decision-making mechanisms under modality conflict and missingness remain largely underexplored. In this paper, to systematically investigate these behaviors, we introduce EmoMM, a comprehensive benchmark featuring modality-aligned, conflict, and missing subsets. Through extensive evaluation, we uncover a Video Contribution Collapse (VCC) phenomenon, where MLLM marginalize video evidence due to high token redundancy and modality preferences. To address this, we propose Conflict-aware Head-level Attention Steering (CHASE), a lightweight mechanism that detects modality conflicts and performs inference-time attention steering, effectively mitigating decision bias without retraining the backbone. Experimental results demonstrate that CHASE consistently improves performance across various settings, significantly enhancing the reliability of MLLM in complex affective scenarios.

Abstract:
Reinforcement learning with verifiable reward (RLVR) has become a promising paradigm for post-training large language models (LLMs) to improve their reasoning capability. However, when the rollout accuracy is low on hard problems, the reward becomes sparse, limiting learning efficiency and causing exploration bottlenecks. Existing approaches either rely on teacher models for distillation or filter out difficult problems, which limits scalability or restricts reasoning improvement through exploration.We propose EvoCoT, a self-evolving curriculum learning framework based on two-stage chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning optimization. EvoCoT constrains the exploration space by self-generating and verifying CoT trajectories, then gradually shortens CoT steps to expand the space in a controlled way. The framework enables LLMs to stably learn from initially unsolved hard problems under sparse rewards. We apply EvoCoT to multiple LLM families, including Qwen, DeepSeek, and Llama. Experiments show that EvoCoT enables LLMs to solve previously unsolved problems, improves reasoning capability without external CoT supervision, and is compatible with various RL fine-tuning methods. We release the source code to support future research.

Abstract:
The scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly limited by data quality. Most methods handle data mixing and sample selection separately, which can break the structure in code corpora. We introduce UniGeM, a framework that unifies mixing and selection by treating data curation as a manifold approximation problem without training proxy models or relying on external reference datasets. UniGeM operates hierarchically: Macro-Exploration learns mixing weights with stability-based clustering; Micro-Mining filters high-quality instances by their geometric distribution to ensure logical consistency. Validated by training 8B and 16B MoE models on 100B tokens, UniGeM achieves 2.0 × data efficiency over a random baseline and further improves overall performance compared to SOTA methods in reasoning-heavy evaluations and multilingual generalization.

Abstract:
Services powered by large language models (LLMs) provide powerful text generation capabilities, but accessing sensitive user inputs raises serious privacy concerns. Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) provide a secure computation environment, enabling sensitive inputs to be safely processed. However, directly deploying high-capacity LLMs in TEEs is often prohibitively expensive due to computation and memory constraints. To reconcile privacy, efficiency, and generation quality, we propose CoTrust, a privacy-preserving collaborative inference framework that combines LLMs with small language models (SLMs) inside TEE. CoTrust uses multiple de-identified views to let the LLM produce a consensus scaffold capturing answer reasoning without exposing private information, which the SLM then grounds in the full input to generate the final response. Experiments on multiple question answering and summarization benchmarks show that CoTrust approaches the performance of unconstrained LLMs, outperforms existing privacy-preserving baselines, and maintains strong privacy protection, while remaining efficient in a TDX-based TEE implementation.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in Visually Rich Document Understanding (VRDU) tasks, but their capabilities are mainly evaluated on pristine, well-structured document images. We consider document reconstruction from shredded fragments, a challenging VRDU setting that requires integrating visual pattern recognition with semantic reasoning under significant content discontinuities. To facilitate systematic evaluation of complex VRDU tasks, we introduce ShredBench, a benchmark supported by an automated generation pipeline that renders fragmented documents directly from Markdown. The proposed pipeline ensures evaluation validity by allowing the flexible integration of latest or unseen textual sources to prevent training data contamination. ShredBench assesses four scenarios (English, Chinese, Code, Table) with three fragmentation granularities (8, 12, 16 pieces). Empirical evaluations on state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal a significant performance gap: The method is effective on intact documents; however, once the document is shredded, restoration becomes a significant challenge, with NED dropping sharply as fragmentation increases. Our findings highlight that current MLLMs lack the fine-grained cross-modal reasoning required to bridge visual discontinuities, identifying a critical gap in robust VRDU research.

Abstract:
While Diffusion Transformers (DiT) have advanced non-autoregressive (NAR) speech synthesis, their high computational demands remain an obvious limitation. Existing DiT-based text-to-speech (TTS) model acceleration approaches predominantly focus on reducing sampling steps through distillation techniques, yet they remain constrained by training costs. We introduce DiTReducio, a training-free acceleration framework that compresses computations in DiT-based TTS models through a progressive calibration process. We propose two compression methods, Temporal Skipping and Branch Skipping, to eliminate redundant computations during inference. Moreover, based on two characteristic attention patterns identified within DiT layers, we devise a pattern-guided strategy to selectively apply the compression methods. Our method allows flexible modulation between generation quality and computational efficiency through adjustable compression thresholds. Experimental evaluations conducted on F5-TTS and MegaTTS 3 demonstrate that DiTReducio achieves a 75.4% reduction in FLOPs and improves the Real-Time Factor (RTF) by 37.1%, while preserving generation quality. The code is available at https://github.com/MM-Speech/DiTReducio.

Abstract:
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) confront an escalating threat from sophisticated multimodal jailbreak attacks. However, existing defense strategies suffer from three critical limitations: (1) the neglect of visual threats; (2) a lack of fine-grained specificity regarding specific attack semantics; and (3) the absence of a dedicated jailbreak detection mechanism, which leads to unnecessary defensive measures against benign inputs. To address these limitations, we propose ReCon, a novel black-box defense framework. ReCon integrates a diffusion-based image purifier to neutralize visual perturbations and an autoencoder-based detector for anomaly filtration. At its core, it employs a Reverse Safety Concept Injection module that maps detected unsafe concepts to fine-grained, constructive Safe Concepts, generating targeted prompts to precisely rectify attack semantics. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ReCon significantly enhances the robustness of LVLMs against jailbreak attacks while preserving performance on benign tasks. Disclaimer: Samples in this paper may be harmful and cause discomfort.

Abstract:
Recent large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in image understanding, yet they still struggle to perform complex reasoning on challenging multimodal problems. In this paper, we present UnAC (Understanding, Abstracting, and Checking), a multimodal prompting method that strengthens reasoning for complex multimodal tasks in LMMs (e.g., GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5, and GPT-4V). To improve image understanding and capture fine details, we propose an adaptive visual prompting strategy that enables LMMs to focus on salient regions. We further design an image-abstraction prompt to effectively extract key information from images. In addition, we introduce a gradual self-checking scheme that improves reasoning by verifying each decomposed subquestion and its answer. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks—MathVista, MM-Vet, and MMMU—demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for business applications, yet business analysis remains inherently complex, demanding rigorous reasoning and the integration of diverse knowledge sources. Existing benchmarks typically target narrow tasks and thus leave a fundamental question unanswered: how can LLMs be reliably applied in business, and how are these applications grounded in underlying theoretical capabilities? To address this gap, we introduce BizCompass, a benchmark explicitly designed to connect theoretical foundations with practical business knowledge and applications. At the knowledge level, BizCompass covers four core domains—finance, economics, statistics, and operations management. At the application level, it structures tasks around three representative roles: the analyst, the trader, and the consultant. This dual-axis design not only exposes performance differences across realistic scenarios but also diagnoses which foundational capabilities enable or constrain success. We systematically evaluate both open-source and commercial LLMs, revealing how theoretical knowledge translates into practical performance in business. The results provide actionable insights for model selection and training optimization in real-world business contexts. All datasets and evaluation code are publicly released to support reproducibility and future research: https://bizcompass.dev.ypemc.com.

Abstract:
As the real world continuously evolves, temporal facts change over time, requiring large language models to simultaneously rely on internal parametric knowledge and externally retrieved evidence for temporal reasoning. However, external knowledge may be inaccurate, while internal knowledge can become outdated. Temporal inconsistencies between these heterogeneous sources can accumulate during multi-step reasoning, leading to Time-Anchor Drift (TAD)—a phenomenon where an incorrect temporal reference is established early and subsequently propagated, ultimately causing reasoning failure. To address this issue, we propose M-TRACE, a multi-agent reasoning framework for temporal knowledge conflicts. M-TRACE explicitly maintains a State Timeline to perform step-wise temporal alignment and coexistence checks between internal states and external evidence. Detected conflicts are summarized into a structured Conflict Report, which guides conflict-aware final reasoning. We further introduce TimeConfQA, a temporal question answering benchmark with controlled temporal knowledge conflicts. Experimental results show that M-TRACE effectively reduces time-anchor drift and consistently improves performance on complex temporal question answering tasks, demonstrating the value of explicit conflict modeling for temporal reasoning. The code can be found at https://github.com/h-yii/M-TRACE.

Abstract:
Knowledge forgetting is a central challenge when adapting LLMs to new tasks. Prior studies indicate that pretrained knowledge is concentrated in the principal singular subspace of pretrained weight W 0 ; so recent Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) variants initialize LoRA in the minor subspace to steer early updates away from principal directions and mitigate forgetting. However, we observe that during fine-tuning, the update direction progressively shifts from the minor to the principal subspace, which is called as Singular-subspace Drift (SD) , thereby allocating more energy to the directions that carry pretrained knowledge and leaving a persistent risk of forgetting. To address this issue, we propose S ingular-subspace D rift C ontrolled LoRA (SDC-LoRA), which constrains the growth of update energy in the principal singular subspace of W 0 and thus mitigate SD. SDC-LoRA proposes Principal Subspace Energy-Controlled Learning , using Spectral Calibration factor 𝛾 sc to selectively downscale gradients along the principal singular subspace of W 0 while keeping minor-subspace updates unchanged. Across extensive experiments with LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Chat on MetaMathQA and CodeFeedback, SDC-LoRA mitigates forgetting on MMLU, TruthfulQA, and HellaSwag while matching or improving GSM8K and HumanEval, offering a practical route to adapt LLMs without sacrificing prior knowledge.

Abstract:
As the field of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) continues to evolve, their potential to handle mathematical reasoning tasks is promising, as they can handle multimodal questions via cross-modal understanding capabilities compared to text-only LLMs. Current mathematical benchmarks predominantly focus on evaluating MLLMs’ problem-solving ability, yet there is a crucial gap in addressing more complex scenarios such as error detection, for enhancing reasoning capability in complicated settings. To fill this gap, we formally formulate the new task — multimodal error detection, and introduce ErrorRadar, the first benchmark designed to assess MLLMs’ capabilities in such a task. ErrorRadar evaluates two sub-tasks: error step identification and error categorization, providing a framework for evaluating MLLMs’ complex mathematical reasoning ability. It consists of 2,500 high-quality multimodal K-12 mathematical problems, collected from real-world student interactions in an educational organization, with expert-based annotation and metadata such as problem type and error category. Through extensive experiments, we evaluated both open-source and closed-source representative MLLMs, benchmarking their performance against educational expert evaluators. Results indicate challenges still remain, as GPT-4o with best model performance is still around 10% behind human evaluation

Abstract:
Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) enhances LLMs by structuring corpus into graphs to facilitate multi-hop reasoning. While recent lightweight approaches reduce indexing costs by leveraging Named Entity Recognition (NER), they rely strictly on structural co-occurrence, failing to capture latent semantic connections between disjoint entities. To address this, we propose EHRAG, a lightweight RAG framework that constructs a hypergraph capturing both structure and semantic level relationships, employing a hybrid structural-semantic retrieval mechanism. Specifically, EHRAG constructs structural hyperedges based on sentence-level co-occurrence with lightweight entity extraction and semantic hyperedges by clustering entity text embeddings, ensuring the hypergraph encompasses both structural and semantic information. For retrieval, EHRAG performs a structure-semantic hybrid diffusion with topic-aware scoring and personalized pagerank (PPR) refinement to identify the top-k relevant documents. Experiments on four datasets show that EHRAG outperforms state-of-the-art baselines while maintaining linear indexing complexity and zero token consumption for construction. Code is available at https://github.com/yfsong00/EHRAG.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for passage reranking in information retrieval, leveraging their superior reasoning capabilities to address the limitations of conventional models on complex queries. However, current LLM-based reranking paradigms are fundamentally constrained by an efficiency-accuracy trade-off: (1) pointwise methods are efficient but ignore inter-document comparison, yielding suboptimal accuracy; (2) listwise methods capture global context but suffer from context-window constraints and prohibitive inference latency. To address these issues, we propose GroupRank, a novel paradigm that balances flexibility and context awareness. To unlock the full potential of groupwise reranking, we propose an answer-free data synthesis pipeline that fuses local pointwise signals with global listwise rankings. These samples facilitate supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, with the latter guided by a specialized group-ranking reward comprising ranking-utility and group-alignment. These complementary components synergistically optimize document ordering and score calibration to reflect intrinsic query-document relevance.Experimental results show GroupRank achieves a state-of-the-art 65.2 NDCG@10 on BRIGHT and surpasses baselines by 2.1 points on R2MED, while delivering a 6.4 × inference speedup. The code is available at https://github.com/AQ-MedAI/Diver/tree/main/Reranker/GroupRank.

Abstract:
Bangladesh’s low-income population faces major barriers to affordable legal advice due to complex legal language, procedural opacity, and high costs. Existing AI legal assistants lack Bengali-language support and jurisdiction-specific adaptation, limiting their effectiveness. To address this, we developed Mina, a multilingual LLM-based legal assistant tailored for the Bangladeshi context. It employs multilingual embeddings and a RAG-based chain-of-tools framework for retrieval, reasoning, translation, and document generation, delivering context-aware legal drafts, citations, and plain-language explanations via an interactive chat interface. Evaluated by law faculty from leading Bangladeshi universities across all stages of the 2022 and 2023 Bangladesh Bar Council examinations, Mina achieved scores of 75–80% in the preliminary MCQs, written, and simulated viva voce components. These results matched or surpassed average human performance, demonstrating strong clarity, contextual understanding, and sound legal reasoning, while operating at approximately 0.1-0.6% of the cost of human lawyers. These results confirm its potential as a low-cost, multilingual AI assistant that automates key legal tasks and scales access to justice, offering a real-world details on building domain-specific, low-resource systems and addressing challenges of multilingual adaptation, efficiency, and sustainable public-service AI deployment.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) perform well on well-posed questions, yet standard question-answering (QA) benchmarks remain far from solved. We argue that this gap is partly due to underspecified questions, that are queries whose interpretation cannot be uniquely determined without additional context. We introduce an LLM-based classifier to identify underspecified questions and apply it to several widely used QA datasets, finding that 16% to over 60% of benchmark questions are underspecified and that LLMs perform significantly worse on them. To isolate the effect of underspecification, we conduct a controlled rewriting experiment that serves as an upper-bound analysis, rewriting underspecified questions into fully specified variants while holding gold answers fixed. QA performance consistently improves under this setting, indicating that many apparent QA failures stem from question underspecification rather than model limitations. Our findings highlight underspecification as an important confound in QA evaluation and motivate greater attention to question clarity in benchmark design.

Abstract:
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, they lack domain-specific expertise to effectively perform chemical tasks. For example, existing MLLMs struggle with both the lower-level task of molecular structure recognition and the higher-level task of chemical spectral data elucidation. When faced with complex molecular structures and multimodal chemical data (including spectral images and texts), they often fail to provide reliable inference, resulting in poor performance. Moreover, there are no benchmark datasets for evaluating multi-step multimodal reasoning capacities in the chemistry domain. To this end, we establish CheMM-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset with 48,500 reasoning steps across four chemical tasks (SmilesQA, IupacQA, MwQA, SpectraQA) for evaluating visual reasoning in both molecular structure recognition and spectral analysis. On top of this, we present CheMM-R1, a state-of-the-art chemistry-specific MLLM trained with CheMMGRPO, a novel adaptation of Group Relative Policy Optimisation tailored for chemical reasoning. CheMMGRPO employs domain-specific reward functions to assess chemical validity, structural accuracy, format compliance, and factual correctness. CheMM-R1 surpasses leading proprietary models (GPT-o3, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Grok-2) across all CheMM-Bench tasks. The evaluation code and model are publicly available.

Abstract:
Audio-Visual Speech Recognition enhances speech recognition robustness in noisy conditions by leveraging visual cues. However, current Multimodal LLMs suffer from a fundamental temporal gap. This gap is characterized by limited fine-grained temporal modeling in vision encoders and progressive temporal semantic degradation throughout the deep layers of LLM decoders. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel framework that deeply stacks temporal tokens across both the encoding and decoding stages. Specifically, we enhance the vision encoder with a temporal-aware attention module and temporal rotary positional embeddings to precisely capture the sequential evolution and dynamics of lip movements. Furthermore, we stack hierarchical temporal tokens that incorporate temporally enriched features into multiple layers of the LLM decoder in a bottom-up manner. Extensive experiments on the LRS2 and LRS3 benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves high efficiency and firm performance, outperforming existing supervised, self-supervised, and LLM-based methods by 6.1% on LRS2 and 7.8% on LRS3.

Abstract:
The accurate extraction of scientific measurements from literature is a critical yet challenging task in AI4Science, enabling large-scale analysis and integration of quantitative research findings. However, Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit severe hallucinations, which significantly undermine the reliability of automated scientific document understanding systems. To address this problem, we propose MeasHalu, a novel framework for mitigating scientific measurement hallucinations through enhanced reasoning and targeted optimization. We first present a fine-grained taxonomy of measurement-specific hallucinations, categorizing errors across quantities, units, modifiers, and relations. Our approach incorporates a two-stage reasoning-aware fine-tuning strategy using augmented scientific data and process-based supervision. Furthermore, we introduce a progressive reward curriculum designed to penalize specific hallucination types, significantly improving extraction faithfulness. Experimental results demonstrate that MeasHalu substantially reduces hallucination rates and improves overall accuracy on the MeasEval benchmark. This work provides a targeted solution to a key bottleneck in automated scientific knowledge extraction, facilitating more trustworthy and scalable machine-assisted scientific literature analysis.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) lack persistent memory for long-term personalized conversations. Existing graph-based memory systems suffer from information dilution, absent provenance tracking, and uniform retrieval that ignores query context. We introduce MemORAI (Memory Organization and Retrieval via Adaptive Graph Intelligence), a framework that integrates three innovations: selective memory filtering with dual-layer compression to retain user-persona-relevant content, a provenance-enriched multi-relational graph tracking factual origins at the turn level, and query-adaptive subgraph retrieval with Dynamic Weighted PageRank that applies query-conditioned edge weighting. Evaluated on LOCOMO and LongMemEval benchmarks, MemORAI achieves state-of-the-art performance in memory retrieval and personalized response generation, demonstrating that selective storage, enriched representation, and adaptive retrieval are essential for coherent, personalized LLM agents.

Abstract:
Despite the rapid progress of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), the field lacks benchmarks that rigorously diagnose their true reasoning abilities and chart meaningful progress toward human-like multimodal intelligence. Most existing evaluations focus on piecemeal or disconnected tasks, obscuring critical cognitive weaknesses and providing little insight for targeted improvement.To address this gap, we introduce BloomBench , part of the Almieyar benchmarking series, the first cognitively human-grounded, bilingual (English–Arabic) multimodal benchmark for VLMs. Grounded in Bloom’s Taxonomy, BloomBench systematically evaluates six levels of cognition (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create) through carefully designed image–question–answer tasks. Built with a semi-automated pipeline and validated through a stratified hybrid quality assurance protocol, it ensures scalability, cultural inclusivity, and linguistic fidelity. Leveraging this framework, we conduct a comprehensive study of state-of-the-art VLMs to diagnose their cognitive profiles. Our analysis reveals a sharp cognitive asymmetry: while state-of-the-art models achieve strong performance ceilings in semantic understanding, they struggle substantially with factual recall and creative synthesis. This demonstrates that current general multimodal proficiency masks deeper limitations in specific cognitive layers.Furthermore, our study highlights a critical performance gap between Arabic and English, exposing limitations in current cross-lingual multimodal reasoning. These findings establish a foundation for developing more cognitively aligned and inclusive VLMs.The benchmark framework and dataset is available at: https://github.com/qcri/Almieyar-Oryx-BloomBench .

Abstract:
Mobile Phone Agents (MPAs) have emerged as a promising research direction due to their broad applicability across diverse scenarios. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) serve as the foundation for MPAs, their effectiveness in handling multiple mobile phone tasks simultaneously remains limited. Although multitask supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is widely adopted for multitask learning, existing approaches struggle to determine optimal training data compositions for peak performance. To address this challenge, we propose DaMo (Data Mixture Optimizer) – a novel solution employing a trainable network that predicts optimal data mixtures by forecasting downstream task performance for any given dataset ratio. To support comprehensive evaluation, we introduce PhoneAgentBench, the first specialized benchmark to evaluate MLLMs on multimodal mobile phone tasks, comprising 1,235 QA pairs spanning diverse real-world industrial mobile application scenarios. Demonstrating strong predictive capability (R²=0.81) in small-scale pilot experiments, DaMo efficiently extrapolates optimal data mixing configurations. Our results show DaMo achieves 3.06% average score improvement on PhoneAgentBench and open-source benchmarks, including BFCL-v3, MME-Reasoning, MME-Perception, and OCRBench, compared to alternative methods. Through predicting optimal data mixture only on open-source benchmarks, DaMo outperforms other approaches by 6.70% in terms of average score. Moreover, DaMo improves the metrics by 12.74% than other methods when used solely for MLLM optimization on the BFCL-v3 task. Notably, DaMo maintains robust scalability, preserving its effectiveness when applied to other model architectures.

Abstract:
The static knowledge representations of large language models (LLMs) inevitably become outdated or incorrect over time. While model-editing techniques offer a promising solution by modifying a model’s factual associations, they often produce unpredictable ripple effects, which are unintended behavioral changes that propagate even to the hidden space. In this work, we introduce CLaRE, a lightweight representation-level technique to identify where these ripple effects may occur. Unlike prior gradient-based methods, CLaRE quantifies entanglement between facts using forward activations from a single intermediate layer, avoiding costly backward passes. To enable systematic study, we prepare and analyse a corpus of 11,427 facts drawn from three existing datasets. Using CLaRE, we compute large-scale entanglement graphs of this corpus for multiple models, capturing how local edits propagate through representational space. These graphs enable stronger preservation sets for model editing, audit trails, efficient red-teaming, and scalable post-edit evaluation. In comparison to baselines, CLaRE achieves an average of 62.2% improvement in Spearman correlation with ripple effects while being 2.74× faster, and using 2.85× less peak GPU memory. Besides, CLaRE requires only a fraction of the storage needed by the baselines to compute and preserve fact representations. Our entanglement graphs and corpus are available at https://github.com/manitbaser/CLaRE.

Abstract:
Recent advances in AI-assisted programming have empowered agents to execute complex workflows via command-line interfaces, however, existing benchmarks are limited by short task horizons, data contamination from GitHub scraping, and a lack of fine-grained evaluation metrics, fail to rigorously evaluate the long-horizon planning and execution capabilities essential for realistic software engineering. To address these gaps, we introduce LongCLI-Bench , a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate agentic capabilities across long-horizon , realistic, sequential engineering tasks. We curated 20 high-quality, long-horizon tasks from over 1,000 computer science assignments and real-world workflows, covering four engineering categories: from scratch, feature addition, bug fixing, and refactoring. LongCLI-Bench employs a dual-set testing protocol, which measures requirement fulfillment (fail(→)pass) and regression avoidance (pass(→)pass) , and incorporates step-level scoring to pinpoint execution failures. Extensive experiments reveal that even state-of-the-art agents achieve pass rates below 20% in LongCLI-Bench. Step-level analysis further indicates that the majority of tasks stall at less than 30% completion, highlighting that critical failures often occur in the early stages. Although self-correction offers marginal gains, human-agent collaboration through plan injection and interactive guidance yields significantly higher improvements. These results highlight that future research must emphasize the development of synergistic human-agent workflows alongside advances in agents’ planning and execution capabilities to overcome key challenges in long-horizon task performance.

Abstract:
Thinking LLMs produce reasoning traces before answering. Prior activation steering work mainly targets on shaping these traces. It remains less understood how answer tokens actually read and integrate the reasoning to produce reliable outcomes. Focusing on quantitative reasoning, we analyze the answer-to-reasoning attention and observe a benign self-reading pattern aligned with correctness, characterized by a forward drift of the reading focus along the reasoning trace and a persistent concentration on key semantic anchors, whereas incorrect solutions exhibit diffuse and irregular attention pattern. We interpret this as internal certainty during answer decoding, where the model commits to a viable solution branch and integrates key evidence. Following this, we propose a training-free steering method driven by Self-Reading Quality (SRQ) scores combining geometric metrics for process control with semantic metrics for content monitoring. SRQ selects data to build steering vectors that guide inference toward benign self-reading and away from uncertain and disorganized reading. Experiments show that our method yields consistent accuracy gains.

Abstract:
This work investigates the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate mathematical equations from scientific texts. Prior work faces challenges in unstructured grounding, multi-equation dependency, and human-aligned evaluation. To address this, we construct a dataset of AI research papers, pairing contextual passages with ground-truth equations and variable descriptions. We develop an explainable equation generation workflow and evaluate it across diverse open- and closed-source LLMs. Our evaluation protocol combines automatic metrics, LLM-based rubrics, and human judgments to assess accuracy, explainability, and human-LLM alignment. Results show that LLMs achieve moderate performance on lexical and syntactic similarity, but struggle with semantic accuracy. LLM-based evaluations show limited alignment with human judgments, highlighting challenges in assessing equation quality. These findings provide insights for improving equation generation models and developing more reliable evaluation methods for scientific creativity. We provide code and data for reproducibility.

Abstract:
The increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in software engineering necessitates rigorous security evaluation of their generated code. However, existing benchmarks often lack relevance to real-world AI-assisted programming scenarios, making them inadequate for assessing the practical security risks associated with AI-generated code in production environments. To address this gap, we introduce A.S.E (AI Code Generation Security Evaluation), a repository-level evaluation benchmark designed to closely mirror real-world AI programming tasks, offering a comprehensive and reliable framework for assessing the security of AI-generated code. Our evaluation of leading LLMs on A.S.E reveals several key findings. In particular, current LLMs still struggle with secure coding. The complexity in repository-level scenarios presents challenges for LLMs that typically perform well on snippet-level tasks. Moreover, a larger reasoning budget does not necessarily lead to better code generation. These observations offer valuable insights into the current state of AI code generation and help developers identify the most suitable models for practical tasks. They also lay the groundwork for refining LLMs to generate secure and efficient code in real-world applications.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate content spanning ideological rhetoric to explicit instructions for violence. However, existing safety evaluations often rely on simplistic binary labels (safe/unsafe), overlooking the nuanced spectrum of risk these outputs pose. To address this, we present XGUARD, a benchmark and evaluation framework designed to assess the severity of extremist content generated by LLMs on a multi-level grading. It includes 3,840 red-teaming prompts generated using templates informed by real-world extremist scenarios from social media, forums, and news. The framework categorizes model responses into five danger levels (0–4) defined by degree of extremist endorsement, enabling nuanced analysis of failure frequency and severity. We introduce the interpretable Attack Severity Curve (ASC) to visualize vulnerabilities and compare defense mechanisms across threat intensities. Using XGUARD, we evaluate five popular LLMs and two lightweight defense strategies, revealing key insights into current safety gaps and trade-offs between robustness and expressive freedom. Our work underscores the value of graded safety metrics for building trustworthy LLMs. The code and dataset is available at https://github.com/Abishethvarman/XGUARD

Abstract:
Leveraging powerful planning and reasoning capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs)-driven Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have demonstrated remarkable scalability and generalizability across complex tasks. However, dynamically routing the optimal combination of agents and collaboration modes for a given query to balance performance and cost remains challenging. To address the limitation of prior work, which focuses on single-agent settings and overlooks collaborative structures and role assignment in MAS, we propose RouterHGC, the first heterogeneous graph contrastive learning framework for MAS routing. We formalize routing as node selection through edge-weight prediction on a heterogeneous graph whose node types include user queries, collaboration modes, agent roles, and LLMs, with message passing capturing their high-order dependencies. We further design a novel global–local contrastive loss function to jointly optimize graph-level representations and edge-level selections, pulling each query graph toward high-performing positives while pushing it away from underperforming or costly negatives. Experiments on five public datasets covering mathematical reasoning, code generation, and knowledge question answering show that RouterHGC outperforms the best single LLM and baselines, achieving 0.80%–6.17% accuracy gains on MATH and HotpotQA while reducing inference cost by 27.40%.

Abstract:
Code refactoring is essential for software maintainability, yet current Large Language Model (LLM) based frameworks primarily focus on syntax and neglect the vital semantic signals in code comments. As pointed out in Fowler’s refactoring theory, explanatory comments function as semantic anchors that provide necessary guidance for method extraction. Moreover, research reports show that more than 84 percent of codebases lack appropriate code comments, which hinders the leverage of such guidance. To bridge this gap, we propose MACOR, a Multi-Agent framework for COmment-guided code Refactoring. In specific, MACOR populates original code with precise comments to provide necessary semantic guidance for the subsequent refactoring process. These generated signals are employed to retrieve expert examples. An iterative feedback is incorporated loop for validation. Experiments are conducted on three benchmarks using three base LLMs. Experimental results show that MACOR significantly optimizes code quality and achieves higher developer acceptance compared to the representative baselines.

Abstract:
Comprehensive understanding of time series remains a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs). Current research is hindered by fragmented task definitions and benchmarks with inherent ambiguities, precluding rigorous evaluation and the development of unified Time Series Reasoning Models (TSRMs). To bridge this gap, we formalize Time Series Reasoning (TSR) via a four-level taxonomy of increasing cognitive complexity. We introduce HiTSR, a hierarchical time series reasoning dataset comprising 83k samples with diverse task combinations and verified Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories. Leveraging HiTSR, we propose LLaTiSA, a strong TSRM that integrates visualized patterns with precision-calibrated numerical tables to enhance the temporal perception of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Through a multi-stage curriculum fine-tuning strategy, LLaTiSA achieves superior performance and exhibits robust out-of-distribution generalization across diverse TSR tasks and real-world scenarios. We will publicly release the code, dataset, and model weights.

Abstract:
Humans are able to predict each other’s actions by reasoning about the others’ underlying goals, preferences, and motives, such as greed and risk-aversion. Game theory provides a framework for studying human behaviors through incentivized games that simulate social situations. We utilized two validated games from the cognitive science literature—the Social Prediction Game (SPG) and the Inspection Game (IG)—to systematically study how well several recent open- and closed-source LLMs predict player actions and whether they can leverage and generalize the players’ motives learned from the iterated games. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art LLMs can achieve accuracy close to human levels in predicting players’ actions with underlying human motives in SPGs. However, unlike humans, who rely on reasoning about players’ motives to inform their predictions, LLMs failed to recognize statistical patterns in players’ actions. As a result, LLM prediction accuracy did not improve over multiple rounds. Our results in the IG further demonstrate that, unlike humans, LLMs were unable to recognize a player’s underlying motives and to generalize their understanding of the same player to a new context. This suggests that LLMs may lack reasoning capabilities. Our findings offer insights into differences in human and LLM reasoning mechanisms, suggesting that further research into human-AI alignment is needed before utilizing LLMs for human behavior modeling and simulation in this and related contexts.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation is a powerful tool for NLP applications. Yet, it is challenging to encode large knowledge bases as compact offline structures while simultaneously achieving accurate, low-latency online retrieval. We propose ZoomRAG, a coarse-to-fine, hierarchical graph inference method to tackle the challenges. ZoomRAG formulates the retrieval task as random walks across multi-scale relational graphs. At the coarse level, it constructs a global relational graph and performs a query-initiated random walk to quickly locate a few relevant documents over the entire corpus. At the finer level, it “zooms into” the selected documents to capture fine-grained semantic and temporal relations, and conducts a second random walk to pinpoint salient evidence chunks for generation. This coarse-to-fine strategy substantially reduces offline indexing costs and accelerates online retrieval. Moreover, random-walk based topological reasoning over rich, multi-scale relational structures enables ZoomRAG to effectively aggregate multi-hop evidence while suppressing noise. Finally, we address the difficulty of handling concurrent RAG queries by algorithm-parallel ZoomRAG. Overall, ZoomRAG avoids building expensive knowledge graphs while achieving 2.2% – 4.9% absolute gains in accuracy over SOTA RAG models, with an average online retrieval latency per-query as low as 0.019 secs by processing hundreds of queries concurrently.

Abstract:
Current guardian models are predominantly Western-centric and optimized for high-resource languages, leaving low-resource African languages vulnerable to evolving harms, cross-lingual failures, and cultural misalignment. Moreover, most guardian models rely on rigid, predefined safety categories that fail to generalize across diverse linguistic and sociocultural contexts. Achieving robust safety requires flexible, runtime-enforceable policies and benchmarks that reflect local norms, harm scenarios, and cultural expectations. We introduce UbuntuGuard, the first policy-based safety benchmark for African languages built from adversarial queries authored by 155 domain experts across sensitive fields, including healthcare. From these expert-crafted queries, we derive context-specific safety policies and reference responses that capture culturally grounded risk signals, enabling policy-aligned evaluation of guardian models. We evaluate 15 models, comprising seven general-purpose LLMs and eight guardian models across three distinct variants: static, dynamic, and multilingual. Our findings reveal that existing English-centric benchmarks overestimate real-world multilingual safety, cross-lingual transfer provides partial but insufficient coverage, and dynamic models, while better equipped to leverage policies at inference time, still struggle to fully localize African-language contexts. These findings highlight the urgent need for multilingual, culturally grounded safety benchmarks to enable the development of reliable and equitable guardian models for low-resource languages.

Abstract:
Current molecular generation benchmarks emphasize task complexity, molecule novelty, and property alignment; they largely overlook a critical concern: the potential safety risks of AI-generated molecules. In practice, many generative models may produce molecules with toxic, reactive, or otherwise hazardous characteristics—posing hidden dangers that remain insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we introduce MolSafeEval, a benchmark dedicated to evaluating and analyzing the safety risks of molecular generation. Unlike prior approaches that rely on narrow toxicity predictors, MolSafeEval integrates heterogeneous safety knowledge—ranging from toxicological databases to hazard rules—into a structured molecular safety knowledge graph. This graph serves as a foundation for large language model–based reasoning, enabling systematic detection and explanation of unsafe features in generated compounds. We further categorize molecular generative models into four representative task types—unconditional generation, property optimization, target protein–based design, and text-based generation—and provide standardized datasets and safety evaluation protocols for each.

Abstract:
Diversity has been gaining interest in the NLP community in recent years. At the same time, state-of-the-art transformer models such as ModernBERT use very large pre-training datasets, which are driven by size rather than by diversity. This summons to investigate theimpact of diversity on pre-training. We do so in this study, with the express intent of reducing pre-training dataset size, while retaining atleast comparable performance. We compare diversity-driven sampling algorithms, and we use the best one to pre-train several ModernBERT models on French with a fixed compute budget. We fine-tune and evaluate them on a variety of French benchmarks. We compare them with models pre-trained on randomly sampled data of commensurate size, with the same compute budget. We find that both random and diversity-driven sampling may reduce the pre-training dataset by up to 94% and the pre-training time by up to 73% while maintaining performance. Moreover, in some tasks, the inherent quality of models, estimated via head-only fine-tuning, is up to 10 points higher with diversity sampling than with random sampling.

Abstract:
LLMs have shown promise in mental health counseling, but existing models are limited to surface-level empathy or predefined therapeutic procedures and lack the ability to actively explore the root causes of psychological distress. Inspired by case conceptualization, we formalize counseling as the online reconstruction of a client’s underlying causal graph through multi-turn dialogue. To this end, we propose TRACE, a two-phase reinforcement learning framework. It implements a causal-graph-driven reward scheme across two phases: an exploration phase that rewards the causal graph reconstruction following a surface-to-deep path, and an intervention phase that rewards targeted restructuring of irrational beliefs. Extensive experiments show that TRACE outperforms existing models, enabling causal-chain-aware psychological intervention beyond surface-level empathy.

Abstract:
Data analysis has become an indispensable part of scientific research. To discover the latent knowledge and insights hidden within massive datasets, we need to perform deep exploratory analysis to realize their full value. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems, more and more researchers are making use of these technologies for insight discovery. However, there are few benchmarks for evaluating insight discovery capabilities. As one of the most comprehensive existing frameworks, InsightBench also suffers from many critical flaws: format inconsistencies, poorly conceived objectives, and redundant insights. These issues may significantly affect the quality of data and the evaluation of agents. To address these issues, we thoroughly investigate shortcomings in InsightBench and propose essential criteria for a high-quality insight benchmark. Regarding this, we develop a data-curation pipeline to construct a new dataset named InsightEval. We further introduce a novel metric to measure the exploratory performance of agents. Through extensive experiments on InsightEval, we highlight prevailing challenges in automated insight discovery and raise some key findings to guide future research in this promising direction.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving rapidly on code generation tasks. While it is important to evaluate their code generation accuracy, ensuring they follow responsible practices is equally critical. Some of the previous works use tools such as CodeQL to match patterns against Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE), suffering from high error rate, while others rely on human annotation to only focus on top CWE categories, limiting security coverage. We propose AutoSUIT Bench, which addresses these limitations through a paradigm to automate the vulnerable code benchmark creation with iterative auto validation. As a result, our benchmark covers 232 CWE categories across C/C++, Java, and Python languages and is designed to evaluate on four coding tasks: (i) code generation, (ii) generation with CWE context, (iii) security patching, and (iv) code completion. Upon benchmarking against LLMs, we found that functionality pass rate is consistently higher than vulnerability pass rate for all programming languages. One notable observation from our benchmark is that LLMs perform well on top CWEs while lacks on others down the list. This highlights the necessity of vulnerable code benchmarks with larger CWE coverage.

Abstract:
While large language models have achieved remarkable performance in complex tasks, they still need a memory system to utilize historical experience in long-term interactions. Existing memory methods (e.g., A-Mem, Mem0) place excessive emphasis on organizing interactions by frequently rewriting them, however, this heavy reliance on summarization risks diluting essential contextual nuances and obscuring key retrieval features. To bridge this gap, we introduce AnchorMem, a novel memory framework inspired by the Proust Phenomenon in cognitive science, where a specific anchor triggers a holistic recollection. We propose a method that decouples the retrieval unit from the generation context. AnchorMem extracts atomic facts from interaction history to serve as retrieval anchors, while preserving the original context as the immutable context. To reveal implicit narrative cues, we construct an associative event graph that uses higher-order event links that bind sets of related facts into shared event representations, strengthening cross-memory integration without relying on generic entities as bridges. During retrieval, the system anchors queries to specific facts and events to locate relevant memories, but reconstructs the context using the associated raw chunks and events. Our method reconciles fine-grained retrieval with the contextual integrity of interactions. Experiments across three closed-source and open-source models on the LoCoMo benchmark demonstrate that AnchorMem significantly outperforms baselines.

Abstract:
Real-world health questions from patients often unintentionally embed false assumptions or premises. In such cases, safe medical communication typically involves redirection: addressing the implicit misconception and then responding to the underlying patient context, rather than the original question. While large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used by lay users for medical advice, they have not yet been tested for this crucial competency. Therefore, in this work, we investigate how LLMs react to false premises embedded within real-world health questions. We develop a semi-automated pipeline to curate MedRedFlag, a dataset of 1100+ questions sourced from Reddit that require redirection. We then systematically compare responses from state-of-the-art LLMs to those from clinicians. Our analysis reveals that LLMs often fail to redirect problematic questions, even when the problematic premise is detected, and provide answers that could lead to suboptimal medical decision making. Our benchmark and results reveal a novel and substantial gap in how LLMs perform under the conditions of real-world health communication, highlighting critical safety concerns for patient-facing medical AI systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/srsambara-1/MedRedFlag.

Abstract:
Suicide memes are memes used to express suicide-related thoughts or comment on suicide-related issues. Suicide memes are increasingly common on social media, yet remain poorly understood and potentially harmful. There is an urgent need to better understand their characteristics and to develop appropriate content moderation strategies that limits users’ exposure to potentially harmful content. Currently, the absence of annotated datasets of suicide memes remains a key barrier to developing and evaluating automated moderation approaches. In this paper, we introduce FigSIM, the first dataset designed for fine-grained analysis of suicide memes. The dataset consists of 1049 memes, each annotated for (1) fine-grained suicide severity levels, (2) figurative phenomena (e.g. metaphors), and (3) suicide-related content (e.g. suicide method depiction). We benchmark 16 unimodal and multimodal models across three tasks: figurative language, suicide severity, and suicide-related content detection. Overall, FigSIM demonstrates that suicide memes pose unique challenges for both modeling and content moderation. Analysis revealed biases, such as underprediction of higher suicide severity levels, especially for figurative memes.

Abstract:
Natural Language Recommendation (NLRec) generates item suggestions based on the relevance between user-issued NL requests and NL item description passages. Existing NLRec approaches often use Dense Retrieval (DR) to compute item relevance scores from aggregation of inner products between user request embeddings and relevant passage embeddings. However, DR views the request as the sole relevance label, thus leading to a unimodal scoring function centered on the query embedding that is often a weak proxy for query relevance. To better capture the potential multimodal distribution of the relevance scoring function that may arise from complex NLRec data, we propose GPR-LLM that uses Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) with LLM relevance judgments for a subset of candidate passages. Experiments on four NLRec datasets and two LLM backbones demonstrate that GPR-LLM with an RBF kernel, capable of modeling multimodal relevance scoring functions, consistently outperforms simpler unimodal kernels (dot product, cosine similarity), as well as baseline methods including DR, cross-encoder, and pointwise LLM-based relevance scoring by up to 65%. Overall, GPR-LLM provides an efficient and effective approach to NLRec within a minimal LLM labeling budget.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with code generation for Ultra Low-Resource Programming Languages (ULRPLs) due to the scarcity of training data. Existing synthetic data generation methods fail in this context, suffering from a severe cold-start problem and resulting in samples that lack diversity. To overcome these challenges, we propose CodeRise, a novel two-stage framework that autonomously generates a high-quality, diverse, and progressively complex curriculum for ULRPLs. The framework first tackles the cold-start and distribution issues by leveraging the full formal syntax of the target language as structural guidance and applying a biased sampling strategy over library modules. Building on this foundation, we fine-tune the model to generate increasingly complex code without explicit syntax input, using an adaptive curriculum and multi-turn self-debugging to progressively improve code quality.We evaluate on two ULRPLs, Tengo and Janet, using migrated HumanEval-Tengo and MBPP-Tengo, as well as our new benchmarks, TengoEval and JanetEval. Experiments show that CodeRise significantly outperforms both training-free and training-based baselines in ultra low-resource environments.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used to interact with and execute tasks in dynamic environments. However, a critical yet overlooked limitation of these agents is that they, by default, assume a stationary context, failing to account for the real-world time elapsed between messages. We refer to this as "temporal blindness". This limitation hinders decisions about when to invoke tools, leading agents to either over-rely on stale context and skip needed tool calls, or under-rely on it and redundantly repeat tool calls. To study this challenge, we constructed TicToc, a diverse dataset of multi-turn user–agent message trajectories across 76 scenarios, spanning dynamic environments with high, medium, and low time sensitivity. We collected human preferences between "calling a tool" and "directly answering" on each sample, and evaluated how well LLM tool-calling decisions align with human preferences under varying amounts of elapsed time. Our analysis reveals that existing models display poor alignment with human temporal perception, with no models achieving a normalized alignment rate better than 65% when given time stamp information. We also show that naive, prompt-based alignment techniques have limited effectiveness for most models, but specific post-training alignment can be a viable way to align multi-turn LLM tool use with human temporal perception. Our data and findings provide a first step toward understanding and mitigating temporal blindness, offering insights to foster the development of more time-aware and human-aligned agents.

Abstract:
The Development Knowledge Question Answering (Dev Knowledge QA) task aims to provide accurate natural language answers to knowledge-seeking questions during software development. To investigate the importance of Dev Knowledge QA in AI-assisted software development and the extent to which it has been explored, we conduct a preliminary analysis of real user–LLM dialogues from WildChat. Our findings indicate that Dev Knowledge QA plays a significant role in real-world software development scenarios, and these raw dialogues cannot be directly used to construct a Dev Knowledge QA benchmark. Existing Dev Knowledge QA benchmarks are limited in development knowledge scope and often not built from real user queries. To bridge this gap, we design a three-phase pipeline that transforms real-world dialogue into simple development knowledge-seeking QA pairs. Through this pipeline, we introduce SimpleDevQA, a multilingual Dev Knowledge QA benchmark inspired by real user dialogues. This dataset covers three languages (English, Chinese, and Russian), and focuses on questions with unique, short, and verifiable answers, making evaluation more accurate and simple. Extensive experiments with 18 mainstream LLMs show that closed-source models generally perform best on SimpleDevQA. We also find that RAG-based knowledge injection improves accuracy, and that Dev Knowledge QA performance correlates with both model confidence and code-generation capability. To facilitate the replication study, we have released our data and code at: https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/SimpleDevQA.

Abstract:
While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard paradigm for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs), its effectiveness in complex medical reasoning remains limited. Existing RAG methods suffer from two main challenges: First, Semantic Drift: without explicit domain constraints, LLM-driven query decomposition often deviates from the original clinical intent, introducing substantial noise that degrades retrieval relevance. Second, Concatenation Fallacy: retrieved evidence from different semantic aspects is aggregated in a naive, unstructured manner, without modeling their inter-dependencies and potential conflicts, which ultimately undermines downstream reasoning. To address these challenges, we propose Med-SRAF, a multi-agent retrieval augmentation framework guided by medical domain knowledge. This framework reconstructs the traditional RAG process through two core mechanisms: (1) Intent-driven Semantic Routing, where a UMLS-based NavigationAgent dynamically maps queries to medical dimensions for strategic search space pruning; and (2) Evidence-based Agentic Fusion, where a FusionAgent resolves conflicts among dimension-specific evidence to build logically consistent reasoning chains. Extensive experiments on five widely used medical benchmarks show that Med-SRAF consistently outperforms existing general RAG baselines, achieving an average accuracy improvement of over 4.9%, highlighting its effectiveness in robust and interpretable medical reasoning. Our code is at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MultiAgent_RAG-F6DC.

Abstract:
The integration of extensive, dynamic knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a significant challenge due to the inherent entanglement of factual data and reasoning patterns. Existing solutions, ranging from non-parametric Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to parametric knowledge editing, are often constrained in practice by finite context windows, retriever noise, or the risk of catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we propose DRIFT , a novel dual-model architecture designed to explicitly decouple knowledge extraction from the reasoning process. Unlike static prompt compression, DRIFT employs a lightweight knowledge model to dynamically compress document chunks into implicit fact tokens conditioned on the query. These dense representations are projected into the reasoning model’s embedding space, replacing raw, redundant text while maintaining inference accuracy. Extensive experiments show that DRIFT significantly improves performance on long-context tasks , outperforming strong baselines among comparably sized models. Our approach provides a scalable and efficient paradigm for extending the effective context window and reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our code and data will be made public upon publication.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) excel at static scientific reasoning, they struggle to model the temporal structure of dynamic physical processes. We present EvoMD-LLM (Evolutionary Molecular Dynamics Large Language Model), a framework that reformulates species-level molecular dynamics as a symbolic temporal language modeling problem. Reactive MD trajectories are discretized into sequences of molecular events, where each token represents a chemical species augmented with its persistence duration, enabling standard autoregressive LLMs to learn compositional evolution over time through efficient fine-tuning. A key component of EvoMD-LLM is temporal scaffolding, which treats event duration as an explicit linguistic token and serves as a structured inductive bias, significantly reducing invalid or hallucinated molecular outputs compared to conventional sequence modeling approaches. We evaluate EvoMD-LLM on multiple temporal prediction tasks, achieving up to 66.14% accuracy and consistently outperforming sequential neural networks and language-based baselines. Beyond quantitative improvements, we qualitatively observe that the model can generate plausible physical interpretations of reaction dynamics, despite not being explicitly trained for explanation. These results demonstrate that symbolic temporal language modeling provides an effective framework for grounding LLMs in dynamic physical simulations.

Abstract:
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) aims to standardize the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) with external tools, yet existing research primarily evaluates functional capabilities while treating the underlying protocol as an opaque black box. This oversight obscures critical inefficiencies in token flows and latency distributed across MCP’s decoupled Host-Client-Server architecture. In this paper, we introduce ProMCP, an end-to-end profiling and instrumentation framework that decomposes the MCP workflow into a six-stage communication pipeline, enabling granular attribution of computational costs. We evaluate widely varying deployment topologies—from air-gapped local models to commercial off-the-shelf (OTS) clients—across 20 servers and 169 tools from MCP-Bench and MCP-Universe. Our analysis reveals a distinct inversion in performance bottlenecks: topologies with customized clients devote 56–72% of total tokens and 60–67% of latency to planning and schema injection, whereas OTS clients concentrate over 85% of latency in final answer synthesis. Crucially, actual tool execution constitutes a negligible fraction of the total cost across all configurations. These findings establish a quantitative baseline for protocol overhead and demonstrate that future optimization must target schema orchestration and transport efficiency rather than tool execution speed. The code is available at: https://github.com/ResponsibleAILab/ProMCP.

Abstract:
The growing demand for scalable mental health support has increased interest in AI-based counseling systems grounded in Motivational Interviewing (MI). However, existing MI datasets do not explicitly model the structured progression of MI phases, which is essential for effective and goal-oriented counseling. To address this gap, we introduce PhaseMI, a phase-structured MI dataset, together with a data generation framework that employs therapist, client, and supervisor LLMs to explicitly control phase transitions. Compared to the best alternative baseline, PhaseMI achieves improved coverage of MI phases, with gains of 12.3% in exploring, 37.6% in guiding, and 61.1% in choosing, and experimental evaluations demonstrate that it yields higher overall counseling quality than baseline datasets.

Abstract:
The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) into mental health applications necessitates robust frameworks for evaluating professional safety alignment. Current evaluative approaches primarily rely on refusal-based safety signals, which offer limited insight into the nuanced behaviors required in clinical practice. In mental health, clinically inadequate refusals can be perceived as unempathetic and discourage help-seeking. To address this gap, we move beyond refusal-centric metrics and introduce PsychEthicsBench, the first principle-grounded benchmark based on Australian psychology and psychiatry guidelines, designed to evaluate LLMs’ ethical knowledge and behavioral responses through multiple-choice and open-ended tasks with fine-grained ethicality annotations. Empirical results across 14 models reveal that refusal rates are poor indicators of ethical behavior, revealing a significant divergence between safety triggers and clinical appropriateness. Notably, we find that domain-specific fine-tuning can degrade ethical robustness, as several specialized models underperform their base backbones in ethical alignment. PsychEthicsBench provides a foundation for systematic, jurisdiction-aware evaluation of LLMs in mental health, encouraging more responsible development in this domain.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for structured tabular data, yet it remains unclear whether their performance reflects genuine reasoning or memorization of pre-training corpora. We investigate this question through a rigorous, contamination-aware evaluation of a representative modular Multi-Agent LLM (MALLM) framework against state-of-the-art AutoML systems and established baselines (TABLET, TABLLM). We evaluate eleven binary classification tasks: five pre-cutoff benchmarks likely seen during LLM pre-training and six post-cutoff datasets released after the LLM knowledge cutoff. Results show a sharp performance dichotomy: MALLM achieves competitive or superior performance on pre-cutoff datasets but substantially underperforms AutoML on post-cutoff data, exhibiting poor calibration and high variance, especially on hard-to-classify instances. By contrast, AutoML models generalize consistently and align confidence more closely with instance hardness. These findings suggest that, despite agentic scaffolding, current LLMs cannot yet replace production-grade discriminative models for tabular classification, underscoring the need for contamination-free benchmarks to accurately assess tabular reasoning capabilities.

Abstract:
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.

Abstract:
Human decision-making in safety-critical domains is governed by abstract policies that intentionally omit exhaustive preconditions/ triggers and contingencies. Executing such underspecified policies reliably in open-world settings remains a fundamental challenge for large language models (LLMs). We introduce NITI, Neural Bridging for Incremental Execution and Trigger Inference from Underspecified Human Policies, a neuro-symbolic framework that treats LLMs not as autonomous planners, but as execution-time concretizers of human intent. NITI incrementally executes abstract policies via verifier-grounded interfaces, infers implicit applicability conditions, repairs execution through neural bridging when assumptions fail, and halts safely under state inconsistency. We evaluate NITI on two structurally distinct embodied domains: a new benchmark of World Cubing Championship 2×2 Rubik’s Cube scrambles (n=50) and a safety-critical automated insulin dosing task. Across multiple frontier LLMs, NITI enables reliable long-horizon execution without task-specific training or search with minimal contextualization infence overhead, substantially outperforming one-shot and chain-of-thought baselines. Our results show that compositional, verifier-grounded execution is essential for safe human–AI collaboration in open-world decision-making. Code and benchmark available here - https://github.com/ImpactLabASU/ACLNITI

Abstract:
Tabular data forms the backbone of high-stakes decision systems in finance, healthcare, and beyond. Yet industrial tabular datasets are inherently difficult: high-dimensional, riddled with missing entries, and rarely labeled at scale. While foundation models have revolutionized vision and language, tabular learning still leans on handcrafted features and lacks a general self-supervised framework. We present MaskTab, a unified pre-training framework designed specifically for industrial-scale tabular data. MaskTab encodes missing values via dedicated learnable tokens, enabling the model to distinguish structural absence from random dropout. It jointly optimizes a hybrid supervised pre-training scheme—utilizing a twin-path architecture to reconcile masked reconstruction with task-specific supervision—and an MoE-augmented loss that adaptively routes features through specialized subnetworks. On industrial-scale benchmarks, it achieves +5.04% AUC and +8.28% KS over prior art under rigorous scaling. Moreover, its representations distill effectively into lightweight models, yielding +2.55% AUC and +4.85% KS under strict latency and interpretability constraints, while improving robustness to distribution shifts. Our work demonstrates that tabular data admits a foundation-model treatment—when its structural idiosyncrasies are respected.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) show remarkable capabilities, their unreliability remains a critical barrier to deployment in high-stakes domains. This survey charts a functional evolution in addressing this challenge: the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior. We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers: in advanced reasoning to optimize computation and trigger self-correction; in autonomous agents to govern metacognitive decisions about tool use and information seeking; and in reinforcement learning to mitigate reward hacking and enable self-improvement via intrinsic rewards. By grounding these advancements in emerging theoretical frameworks like Bayesian methods and Conformal Prediction, we provide a unified perspective on this transformative trend. This survey provides a comprehensive overview, critical analysis, and practical design patterns, arguing that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in various question-answering tasks. However, recent studies showcase that LLMs are susceptible to persuasion and could adopt counterfactual beliefs.We present a systematic evaluation of LLM susceptibility to persuasion under the Source–Message–Channel–Receiver (SMCR) communication framework. Across six mainstream Large Language Models (LLMs) and three domains (factual knowledge, medical QA, and social bias), we analyze how different persuasive strategies influence stated belief stability over multiple interaction turns.We further examine whether verbalized confidence prompting (i.e., eliciting self-reported confidence scores) affects resistance to persuasion.Results show that the smallest model (Llama 3.2-3B) exhibits extreme compliance, with 82.5% of belief changes occurring at the first persuasive turn (average end turn of 1.1–1.4).Contrary to expectations, verbalized confidence prompting increases vulnerability by accelerating belief erosion rather than enhancing robustness. Finally, an exploratory study of adversarial fine-tuning reveals highly model-dependent effectiveness: GPT-4o-mini achieves near-complete robustness (98.6%) and Mistral 7B improves substantially (35.7% → 79.3%), but Llama models remain highly susceptible ( < 14% RQ1) even when fine-tuned on their own failure cases. Together, these findings highlight substantial model-dependent limits of current robustness interventions and offer guidance for developing more trustworthy LLMs[].

Abstract:
Despite substantial efforts toward improving the moral alignment of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), it remains unclear whether their ethical judgments are stable in realistic settings. This work studies moral robustness in VLMs, defined as the ability to preserve moral judgments under textual and visual perturbations that do not alter the underlying moral context. We systematically probe VLMs with a diverse set of model-agnostic multimodal perturbations and find that their moral stances are highly fragile, frequently flipping under simple manipulations. Our analysis reveals systematic vulnerabilities across perturbation types, moral domains, and model scales, including a sycophancy trade-off where stronger instruction-following models are more susceptible to persuasion. We further show that lightweight inference-time interventions can partially restore moral stability. These results demonstrate that moral alignment alone is insufficient and that moral robustness is a necessary criterion for the responsible deployment of VLMs.

Abstract:
Large Audio Language Models have shown impressive performance on single-clip audio language tasks such as automatic speech recognition, captioning, and sound event recognition. Yet, their ability to reason over interleaved multi-audio contexts-where answering a query requires relating information across multiple audio clips-remains limited. We present PolyAudio, a LALM built on Audio Flamingo 3 that targets multi-audio understanding via instruction tuning rather than massive-scale pre-training, and PolyAudio-Instruct, a high-quality instruction-tuning dataset consisting of 1.3M+ QA pairs, spanning over 14 task subsets to empower multi-audio understanding and reasoning. PolyAudio uses an explicit interleaved representation with clip indexing to encourage faithful grounding and reduce ambiguity in multi-clip references. We evaluate PolyAudio on a diverse suite of multi-audio benchmarks alongside standard single-audio tasks. PolyAudio achieves strong performance on multi-audio reasoning, outperforming competitive baselines that are also often limited to reasoning over up-to 2 audio clips, while preserving robust single-clip performance. Overall, our results suggest that precise, academic-scale multi-audio instruction tuning can unlock advanced cross-clip reasoning capabilities, enabling more capable audio-centric assistants.

Abstract:
Deploying large language models (LLMs) on smartphones poses significant engineering challenges due to stringent constraints on memory, latency, and runtime flexibility. In this work, we present a hardware-aware framework for efficient on-device inference of a LLaMA-based multilingual foundation model supporting multiple use cases on Samsung Galaxy S24 and S25 devices with SM8650 and SM8750 Qualcomm chipsets respectively. Our approach integrates application-specific LoRAs as runtime inputs to a single frozen inference graph, enabling dynamic task switching without recompilation or memory overhead. We further introduce a multi-stream decoding mechanism that concurrently generates stylistic variations—such as formal, polite, or jovial responses—within a single forward pass, reducing latency by up to 6×. To accelerate token generation, we apply Dynamic Self-Speculative Decoding (DS2D), a tree-based strategy that predicts future tokens without requiring a draft model, yielding up to 2.3× speedup in decode time. Combined with quantization to INT4 and architecture-level optimizations, our system achieves 4–6× overall improvements in memory and latency while maintaining accuracy across 9 languages and 8 tasks. These results demonstrate practical feasibility of deploying multi-use-case LLMs on edge devices, advancing the commercial viability of Generative AI in mobile platforms.

Abstract:
Diffusion large language models (DLLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to autoregressive (AR) generation, uniquely offering token-level probabilities under bidirectional context. However, the semantics of their native uncertainty estimates remain underexplored. In this work, we uncover a calibration paradox inherent to the bidirectional generation mechanism of state-of-the-art DLLMs. Concretely, we demonstrate that diffusion confidence is structurally distinct from AR likelihood. Notably, LLaDA-8B is highly miscalibrated (31.2% ECE) on mathematical reasoning benchmarks, yet possesses superior discriminative power (0.826 AUROC), significantly outperforming comparable AR baselines in single-pass settings (0.611 AUROC). We diagnose that this paradox arises because diffusion confidence functions less like a probability of correctness and more like a proxy for structural consistency enabled by the model’s bidirectional access to the entire solution path. We further show that lightweight post-hoc calibration can reconcile this gap, reducing ECE by over 60% while preserving the strong ranking signal. Our findings suggest that DLLMs offer a unique, cost-efficient uncertainty signal for reasoning tasks that complements expensive AR approaches.

Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-integrated applications have become increasingly prevalent, yet face critical security vulnerabilities from prompt injection (PI) attacks. Defending against PI attacks faces two major issues: malicious instructions can be injected through diverse vectors, and injected instructions often lack clear semantic boundaries from the surrounding context, making them difficult to identify. To address these issues, we propose InstruCoT, a model enhancement method for PI defense that synthesizes diverse training data and employs instruction-level chain-of-thought fine-tuning, enabling LLMs to effectively identify and reject malicious instructions regardless of their source or position in the context. We evaluate InstruCoT across three critical dimensions: Behavior Deviation, Privacy Leakage, and Harmful Output. Experimental results across four LLMs demonstrate that InstruCoT significantly outperforms baselines in all dimensions while maintaining utility performance without degradation.

Abstract:
Accurate International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding is crucial for hospital management and healthcare data governance. In clinical practice, straightforward cases can often be matched directly to ICD codes via diagnostic text, establishing retrieval-based methods as the baseline. More advanced approaches leverage large language models to rerank these results. However, real-world coding scenarios are typically more complex, demanding reasoning that goes beyond superficial descriptions. For instance, it involves synthesizing key information such as disease subtype, anatomical location, and complications from complex progress notes to accurately identify the primary diagnosis. However, a comprehensive evaluation framework for ICD coding based on complete EMRs is still lacking. To address these challenges, we constructed the Code4Detail dataset, which comprises 560 real clinical records covering 434 common diseases across 19 core chapters of ICD-10. To systematically explore the capability boundaries of large language models under different paradigms, we further propose the Travel on the ICD Tree (ToT-ICD) evaluation framework. Unlike the conventional retrieval-recall approach, ToT-ICD treats ICD coding as a structured exploration process across a hierarchical taxonomy. We design an agentic workflow that integrates similarity retrieval, path-guided navigation, and dynamic backtracking, enabling logical reasoning and decision-making under coding rules.

Abstract:
Speech signals convey abundant speaker-related metadata, yet current privacy research predominantly focuses on identity-centric voiceprint protection, leaving sensitive Speaker Attribute Privacy (SAP) largely underexplored. This paper introduces AudioPrivacy, a large-scale Chinese dataset designed to systematically evaluate SAP leakage in realistic, everyday scenarios. Comprising 227.3 hours of audio from 1,000 speakers, it uniquely encompasses four parallel modalities: speech, singing, paralinguistic expressions, and non-vocal acoustic signals (e.g., footsteps). Annotated with 11 diverse attributes, including fine-grained physiological traits often overlooked in traditional corpora, AudioPrivacy enables a granular analysis of acoustic privacy risks. Our evaluations reveal significant leakage across multiple attributes, even when inferred from non-vocal signals. Furthermore, we demonstrate that state-of-the-art Multimodal Large Language Models (MM LLMs) can precisely profile speakers and exacerbate these risks, underscores the urgent need to rethink privacy-preserving mechanisms in the era of powerful audio foundation models.

Abstract:
Asynchronous psychological counseling (APC) represents a crucial mental health service modality that transcends temporal and spatial constraints. However, its development faces significant data scarcity challenges: due to stringent privacy protection requirements and professional ethical considerations, direct collection of conversational data from authentic APC scenarios is virtually impossible. To address this challenge, we design a self-optimizing multi-agent framework for counseling dialogue generation, CFlowPsy , which utilizes a small amount of real anonymized counseling cases as seed data to synthesize diverse problem-solving-oriented APC conversations through large language models. Specifically, the framework employs a Persona-Flow module to continuously track and update clients’ basic information, real-time emotions, and counseling progress, providing dynamic personalized analytical support for counselors and enabling self-optimization of generated dialogues. Simultaneously, the framework ensures that generated interventions contain explicit reasoning processes, demonstrating clear psychological analysis and logic, thereby enhancing the accuracy and consistency of responses. Under this framework, we develop the first Chinese APC dataset, CFlowPsyD , comprising 1,700 high-quality extended conversations. Extensive experiments and human evaluations confirm that the proposed CFlowPsyD dataset successfully simulates human-like APC processes.

Abstract:
While Retrieval-Augmented Generation(RAG) enhances multi-modal large language models(MLLMs) by introducing external knowledge, existing RAG systems still face significant limitations when dealing with complex visual reasoning. On one hand, MLLMs, being generative models, produce suboptimal embeddings for retrieval tasks. On the other hand, existing methods naively insert images into context without adequate visual perception, thereby limiting reasoning capabilities. To address these challenges, we propose MDocRAG-RL, a novel RAG framework for complex visual reasoning. We design specialized pre-training and fine-tuning tasks to enable MLLMs to compress visual document representations and align textual and visual embeddings for improved retrieval efficiency. Additionally, we design a visual perception action space for the generator that allows progressive coarse-to-fine information acquisition from visually-rich documents. Furthermore, we develop a reinforcement learning framework to enhance the complex visual reasoning capability of the RAG system. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging benchmarks demonstrate the significant effectiveness of our approach, achieving state-of-the-art performance across various benchmarks.

Abstract:
While LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) demonstrate remarkable problem-solving capabilities, their interconnectivity acts as a conduit for the rapid spread of malicious injections. Addressing the limitations of static defenses, we present TopoSHIELD, a framework that reshapes the flow of malice via risk-aware topological evolution. Our approach utilizes a spatio-temporal graph neural network to monitor interaction dynamics, calculating node risk entropy (NRE) and edge attack conductivity (EAC) to pinpoint vulnerabilities. Guided by these metrics, TopoSHIELD executes precise structural interventions, pruning high-risk edges and isolating compromised communities to block attack diffusion. Empirically, TopoSHIELD reduces toxicity by 58% on GPT-4o while preserving high utility (>90% success rate), outperforming existing baselines in both suppression efficiency and scalability.

Abstract:
The growing adoption of multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (mRAG) pipelines for vision-centric tasks (e.g., visual QA) introduces important privacy challenges. In particular, while mRAG provides a practical capability to connect private datasets and improve model performance, it risks the leakage of private information from these datasets. In this paper, we perform an empirical study to analyze the privacy risks inherent in the mRAG pipeline observed through standard model prompting. Specifically, we implement a case study that attempts to determine whether a visual asset (e.g., image) is included in the mRAG, and, if present, to leak the metadata (e.g., caption) related to it.Our findings highlight the need for privacy-preserving mechanisms and motivate future research on mRAG privacy. Our code is published online: https://github.com/aliwister/mrag-attack-eval .

Abstract:
Supervised Semantic Differential (SSD) is a mixed quantitative–interpretive method that models how text meaning varies with continuous individual-difference variables by estimating a semantic gradient in an embedding space and interpreting its poles through clustering and text retrieval. SSD applies PCA before regression, but currently no systematic method exists for choosing the number of retained components, introducing avoidable researcher degrees of freedom in the analysis pipeline. We propose a PCA sweep procedure that treats dimensionality selection as a joint criterion over representation capacity, gradient interpretability, and stability across nearby values of K. We illustrate the method on a corpus of short posts about artificial intelligence written by Prolific participants who also completed Admiration and Rivalry narcissism scales. The sweep yields a stable, interpretable Admiration-related gradient contrasting optimistic, collaborative framings of AI with distrustful and derisive discourse, while no robust alignment emerges for Rivalry. We also show that a counterfactual using a high-PCA dimension solution heuristic produces diffuse, weakly structured clusters instead, reinforcing the value of the sweep-based choice of K. The case study shows how the PCA sweep constrains researcher degrees of freedom while preserving SSD’s interpretive aims, supporting transparent and psychologically meaningful analyses of connotative meaning.

Abstract:
We introduce negative space learning machine translation (NSL-MT), a training method for underresourced languages, that augments limited parallel data with synthetically generated violations of the target language’s grammar and explicitly penalizes the model when it assigns high probability to these linguistically invalid outputs. NSL-MT delivers improvements across all baselines we tested, including 3-12% BLEU gains for well-performing models and 56-89% gains for models lacking decent initial support. Furthermore, NSL-MT provides a 5x data efficiency multiplier: training with 1,000 examples matches or exceeds normal training with 5,000 examples. NSL-MT thus provides a data-efficient alternative training method for settings where parallel data is limited.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit exceptional zero-shot relevance modeling, their high computational cost necessitates framing passage retrieval as a budget-constrained global optimization problem. Existing approaches passively rely on first-stage dense retrievers, which leads to two limitations: (1) failing to retrieve relevant passages in semantically distinct clusters, and (2) failing to propagate relevance signals to the broader corpus. To address these limitations, we propose Bayesian Active Learning with Gaussian Processes guided by LLM relevance scoring (BAGEL), a novel framework that propagates sparse LLM relevance signals across the embedding space to guide global exploration. BAGEL models the multimodal relevance distribution across the entire embedding space with a query-specific Gaussian Process (GP) based on LLM relevance scores. Subsequently, it iteratively selects passages for scoring by strategically balancing the exploitation of high-confidence regions with the exploration of uncertain areas. Extensive experiments across four benchmark datasets and two LLM backbones demonstrate that BAGEL effectively explores and captures complex relevance distributions and outperforms LLM reranking methods under the same LLM budget on all four datasets.

Abstract:
Diagnosing fine-grained hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) can greatly advance their reliable deployment in real-world applications. Nevertheless, current benchmarks predominantly employ flat metrics that treat errors in isolation, leaving a gap in evaluating the complex causal dependencies between visual perception and textual reasoning. Motivated by this, we introduce the Knowledge-Guided In-Context Probing (K-GIP) framework to fill this gap. Specifically, K-GIP constructs a high-fidelity dual-perception ground truth to transform abstract priors into multi-granularity queries. Furthermore, we propose a Verification Scene Graph metric equipped with a Sequential Logic Pruning protocol, which explicitly models existence-attribute dependencies to strictly penalize logical fractures. We conduct comprehensive evaluations of mainstream LVLMs across three datasets using K-GIP. The experimental results highlight that our methodology successfully isolates deep reasoning failures from simple perceptual misses. We hope K-GIP can serve as a valuable and rigorous standard to assess logical robustness in multimodal systems.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) acquire most of their knowledge during pretraining, which ties them to a fixed snapshot of the world and makes adaptation to continuously evolving knowledge challenging. As facts, entities, and events change over time, models may experience continuous knowledge drift, resulting not only in outdated predictions but also in temporally inconsistent reasoning. Although existing approaches, such as continual finetuning, knowledge editing, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), aim to update or supplement model knowledge, they are rarely evaluated in settings that reflect chronological, evolving, and real-world knowledge evolution. In this work, we introduce a new benchmark of real-world dynamic events, constructed from time-stamped evidence that captures how knowledge evolves over time, which enables systematic evaluation of model adaptation under continuous knowledge drift. The benchmark reveals that most existing methods, including vanilla RAG and several learning-based approaches, struggle under this setting, exposing critical limitations such as catastrophic forgetting and temporal inconsistency. To mitigate these limitations, we propose a time-aware retrieval baseline, Chronos, which progressively organizes retrieved evidence into an Event Evolution Graph to enable more temporally consistent understanding in LLMs without additional training. Overall, this work provides a foundation for analyzing and advancing LLM adaptation to continuous knowledge drift in realistic settings.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to explain, summarize, and translate real-world events, including ongoing geopolitical conflicts. Yet it remains unclear whether they reproduce conflict-specific propaganda and, if so, how this appears in their outputs. We study this question for the Russia-Ukraine war through perspectival divergence, the extent to which model outputs align with competing narratives from different information ecosystems. We construct a conflict-aware evaluation set of neutral English event statements paired with Russian (RU)- and Ukrainian (UA)-oriented reference texts drawn from news outlets and Telegram channels. We then evaluate multiple LLMs under several prompting contexts using a reference-based semantic distance metric that measures directional proximity to RU- and UA-oriented references. To explain not only which side a model is closer to but also how that alignment is expressed, we further analyze outputs using five propaganda-relevant categories: Framing Narrative, Emotional Manipulation, Source Credibility, Social Pressure Identity, and Toponymy Naming. Across models, we find stable, model-specific leanings and technique profiles that persist across prompts and are not captured by standard factuality-oriented metrics. Our findings show that models that appear neutral under conventional evaluations can still encode systematic, conflict-specific propaganda patterns, underscoring the need for conflict-aware evaluation frameworks.

Abstract:
Automated assessment of patent quality is increasingly important given the growth of patent filings and the adoption of AI-assisted drafting. Existing methods often rely on modular pipelines or generic detectors, resulting in fragmented decisions and limited integration across quality dimensions. We propose P-QuASAR (Patent Quality Assurance via Structured Assessment and Refinement), a unified probabilistic framework that represents patent specifications as Quality Graphs. Multiple interdependent quality dimensions—such as regulatory compliance, technical coherence, and figure–text consistency—are jointly modeled using uncertainty-aware Quality Assessment Functions with learned edge potentials. Cross-dimensional evidence propagation via loopy belief propagation enables calibrated defect detection, while Optimal Intervention Paths translate inferred quality states into prioritized and actionable refinement recommendations. Evaluated on 500 patents across eight IPC domains against seven state-of-the-art baselines, P-QuASAR achieves substantial improvements: 99.86% balanced accuracy on regulatory compliance, 88.91% on technical coherence, and 94.70% on figure consistency, outperforming the strongest baselines by 3.0%, 9.0%, and 7.1%, respectively. Ablation studies confirm that joint graph reasoning contributes 3.66 points to average performance. When applied for refinement, P-QuASAR reduces average defects in AI-generated patents from 9.04–12.15 to 3.21 per document, surpassing human-authored patents.

Abstract:
The double-edged sword of integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) requires an effective triadic collaboration mechanism among LLMs, teachers and students, especially for K-12 education. By developing a triadic collaboration system to support K-12 writing learning, a multidimensional evaluation framework grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics and the suggestion trajectory tracing pipeline, this paper contributes a large-scale empirical dataset involving 57,954 essays from 10,195 students across 120 schools over two years. Our findings confirm the efficacy of this system in improving writing quality through a strategic labor division: the LLM serves as a generative engine to mitigate teacher burnout, and the teacher acts as a pedagogical gatekeeper and bridge to guarantee feedback quality. While both LLM and teacher are critical for skill improvement, we uncover a ceiling effect where excessive linguistic expansion yields diminishing marginal utility. These suggest a dynamically adaptive LLM-teacher collaboration as student proficiency increases.

Abstract:
Educational knowledge graph (EKG) is a critical component of intelligent tutoring systems that is structured around cognitive principles and provides support for interactive teaching. Most existing EKGs usually rely on simplistic relations, bind with single subjects, and lack integration with explicit learning objectives. In this paper, we introduce CogNet-KG, a novel and cognitively-structured large-scale knowledge graph for STEM learning. CogNet-KG models nearly 500 core concepts across five subjects with various cognitively-grounded relations corresponding to specific learning objectives, thereby encoding a rich cognitive schema for guiding more effective teaching. Based on this structure, we then construct a high-quality tutoring dialogue dataset CogDialogue-QA by leveraging adaptive instructional strategies. Additionally, we train CogTutor-LM, a specialized tutorial LLM that internalizes this structured pedagogical reasoning. Overall evaluation demonstrates that CogTutor-LM generates responses with significantly greater instructional coherence and more appropriate pedagogical guidance compared to baselines, validating the effectiveness of our graph-driven approach to fostering knowledge integration and stimulating students’ thinking. The datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/KCAIED/CogNet-KG.

Abstract:
With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), In-Context Learning (ICL) has emerged as one of the universal paradigms for unleashing the capabilities of LLMs. However, LLMs are generally plagued by various biases in context example selection, which can distort the model’s predictions. Although extensive research has focused on designing heuristic sample selection methods to mitigate biases in ICL, these approaches often struggle to adapt to highly biased out-of-distribution (OOD) scenarios with significant shifts between test samples and context samples. To overcome the aforementioned issue, this paper proposes a LLM-driven iterative derivation method for OOD data pseudo-labeling (named LPL ), aiming to mitigate the risk of performance degradation caused by OOD bias by avoiding direct use of source data. To mitigate the misleading effects of noise in pseudo-labels, we propose a filtering metric that integrates model confidence and perturbation perplexity to enhance the quality of pseudo-labels. Subsequently, in each iteration, LPL utilizes this metric to expand new pseudo-labeled data as contextual demonstrations and ultimately adopts a voting mechanism to ensure the stability of the predictions. A series of experiments conducted on various LLMs have confirmed that our proposed method can effectively reduce OOD biases, thereby opening up new avenues for research in ICL biases.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains reliant on tabular data (e.g., financial reporting), where undetected logical inconsistencies such as mismatched totals and components can lead to critical errors. Yet, the ability of LLMs to identify such inconsistencies remains poorly understood, hindered by the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks and cell-level annotated datasets. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive benchmark SEC-Fintables comprising 103,395 real-world and error-injected table instances, alongside a novel evaluation protocol that decomposes inconsistency detection into granular sub-tasks. Through evaluating both proprietary and open-source LLMs on SEC-Fintables, we find that contemporary LLMs exhibit only partial competence in detecting logical inconsistencies. Our study reveals key limitations and improvement opportunities for LLMs. We believe SEC-Fintables and our evaluation protocol can serve as a practical resource for advancing reliable inconsistency detection of LLMs in tabular reasoning. We release SEC-Fintables at https://github.com/XIEFOX/SEC-Fintables.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs), yet applying it to multi-turn agentic tasks remains challenging due to the long-horizon nature of interactions and the stochasticity of environmental feedback.We identify a structural failure mode in agentic exploration: suboptimal actions elicit noisy observations into misleading contexts, which further weaken subsequent decision-making, making recovery increasingly difficult.This cumulative feedback loop of errors renders standard exploration strategies ineffective and susceptible to the model’s reasoning and the environment’s randomness.To mitigate this issue, we propose ProCeedRL: Process Critic with Explorative Demonstration RL, shifting exploration from passive selection to active intervention.ProCeedRL employs a process-level critic to monitor interactions in real time, incorporating reflection-based demonstrations to guide agents in stopping the accumulation of errors.We find that this approach significantly exceeds the model’s saturated exploration performance, demonstrating substantial exploratory benefits.By learning from exploratory demonstrations and on-policy samples, ProCeedRL significantly improves exploration efficiency and achieves superior performance on complex deep search and embodied tasks.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in visual-text processing. However, existing static image-text benchmarks are insufficient for evaluating their dynamic perception and interactive reasoning abilities. We introduce Vision-centric Multiple Abilities Game Evaluation (V-MAGE), a novel game-based evaluation framework designed to systematically assess MLLMs’ visual reasoning in interactive, continuous-space environments. V-MAGE features five distinct video games comprising over 30 carefully constructed evaluation scenarios. These scenarios are set in free-form, visually complex environments that require models to interpret dynamic game states and make decisions based solely on visual input, thereby closely reflecting the conditions encountered by human players. To ensure robust and interpretable comparisons across models, V-MAGE employs a dynamic ELO-based ranking system that accounts for varying difficulty levels and task diversity. Benchmarking state-of-the-art MLLMs against human baselines reveals that while leading models approach human-level performance in simple tasks, their performance drops significantly in complex scenarios requiring advanced reasoning and task orchestration. This persistent performance gap highlights fundamental limitations in current MLLMs’ ability to perform vision-grounded, interactive frame-by-frame control in simulated continuous-time environments. Through extensive analyses, we demonstrate the utility of V-MAGE in uncovering these limitations and providing actionable insights for improving the visual and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in dynamic, interactive settings. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/CSU-JPG/V-MAGE.

Abstract:
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) enable interpretability research by decomposing entangled model activations into monosemantic features. However, under what circumstances SAEs derive most fine-grained latent features for safety—a low-frequency concept domain—remains unexplored. Two key challenges exist: identifying SAEs with the greatest potential for generating safety domain-specific features, and the prohibitively high cost of detailed feature explanation. In this paper, we propose Safe-SAIL, a unified framework for interpreting SAE features in safety-critical domains to advance mechanistic understanding of large language models. Safe-SAIL introduces a pre-explanation evaluation metric to efficiently identify SAEs with strong safety domain-specific interpretability, and reduces interpretation cost by 55% through a segment-level simulation strategy. Building on Safe-SAIL, we train a comprehensive suite of SAEs with human-readable explanations and systematic evaluations for 1,758 safety-related features spanning four domains: pornography, politics, violence, and terror. Using this resource, we conduct empirical analyses and provide insights on the effectiveness of Safe-SAIL for risk feature identification and how safety-critical entities and concepts are encoded across model layers. All models, explanations, and tools are publicly released in an open-source toolkit at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Safe-SAIL/.

Abstract:
We introduce LongInsightBench , the first benchmark designed to assess models’ ability to understand long videos, with a focus on human language, viewpoints, actions, and other contextual elements, while integrating visual, audio, and text modalities. Our benchmark excels in three key areas: a) Long-Duration, Human-Centric Videos: We carefully selected approximately 1,000 videos from open-source datasets FineVideo based on duration limit and multi-modal information density, focusing on content like lectures, interviews, and vlogs, which contain rich human-centric semantic and contextual attributes. b) Diverse and Challenging Task Scenarios: We have designed six challenging task scenarios, including both Intra-Event and Inter-Event Tasks. c) Rigorous and Comprehensive Quality Assurance Pipelines: We have developed a three-step, semi-automated data quality assurance pipeline to ensure the difficulty and validity of the synthesized questions and answer options. Based on LongInsightBench, we designed a series of experiments. which shows that Omni-modal models(OLMs) still face challenge in tasks requiring precise temporal localization (T-Loc) and long-range causal inference (CE-Caus). Surprisingly, extended experiments reveal the information loss in modal fusion of OLMs, which we called the Fusion Deficit Paradox .

Abstract:
Flexible word boundaries and linguistic obfuscation, particularly slang, challenge precise span-level hate speech detection in Chinese. While benchmarks such as STATE ToxiCN demand the exact extraction of Target-Argument-Hateful-Group quadruples, generative Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail strict boundary constraints. In contrast, discriminative 2D Grid Tagging methods frequently encounter label collisions. To resolve these problems, this study presents a Slang-aware Label-Aligned Framework. A Structural-Semantic Lexicon Fusion (SSLF) module reduces ambiguity by mapping obscure slang to explicit hate semantics. Additionally, the proposed Label-Disentangled Volumetric Tagging (LDVT) projects token interactions into a volumetric space. LDVT uses task-specific branches and dedicated label channels to structurally mitigate feature interference. This approach removes label collisions without heuristic post-processing. Empirical outcomes on STATE ToxiCN indicate a Hard-F1 of 30.09%. This performance is 5.82% higher than the best fine-tuned LLM baseline and confirms the method is effective for exact-match extraction.

Abstract:
Detecting toxic content using language models is crucial yet challenging. While substantial progress has been made in English, toxicity detection in French remains underdeveloped, primarily due to the lack of culturally relevant, human-annotated, large-scale datasets. In this work, we release TOXIFRENCH, a dataset of 53,622 French online comments, together with a 1,388-sample balanced benchmark split for systematic evaluation. The dataset is constructed via a semi-automated annotation pipeline that reduces manual labeling to only 10% through high-confidence LLM-based pre-annotation and human verification, while ensuring statistically near-perfect alignment with human-only annotation. We then benchmark a broad range of models and uncover a counterintuitive insight: Small Language Models (SLMs) often surpass larger models in robustness and generalization on this task. Motivated by this finding, we propose a novel Chain-of-Thought (CoT) fine-tuning strategy using a dynamic weighted loss that progressively emphasizes the model’s final decision, significantly improving faithfulness. Our fine-tuned 4B model (Qwen3-4B) achieves state-of-the-art performance on the benchmark, improving its balanced accuracy by 10% over its baseline and achieving better performance than GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark, while successfully retaining cross-lingual capabilities.

Abstract:
Large language models have shown strong generative and reasoning capabilities, yet they still struggle with natural language to first order logic (NL2FOL) translation due to logical hallucination. We propose LSEG (Logic Structure and Entropy Guided), a fine-tuning free framework designed to improve logical consistency during inference. The core idea of LSEG is to correct hidden state deviation by leveraging logical stability across logic preserving perturbations of the input. Such deviation is especially harmful in NL2FOL, as even small drifts can flip quantifier scope or logical operators, producing formulas that are syntactically valid yet logically incorrect. First, LSEG constructs perturbation-averaged direction vectors that approximate a stable logical center. Second, it derives layer-wise correction directions by contrasting original and perturbed representations. Lastly, LSEG uses an entropy-guided adaptive mechanism to inject these directions only when the model exhibits unstable or over-confident reasoning states, thereby preserving fluency while correcting logical drift. Experiments on the FOLIO and MALLS benchmarks show that LSEG consistently improves logical equivalence scores over strong baselines, despite requiring no training or parameter updates. Further evaluation on LogicLLaMA demonstrates LSEG’s architecture-agnostic effectiveness.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) often underperform in domain adaptation for industrial settings, where available corpora are limited and structurally diverse. These corpora frequently include non-natural formats such as tables, entity lists, or bullet-point instructions that hinder effective learning. To understand and improve domain-adaptive pretraining on such data, we introduce SParK-Eval (Structure-aware Parametric Knowledge Evaluation), a framework that constructs question–answer pairs from pretraining data and annotates each with its input structure (e.g., natural sentence, table, list). This enables fine-grained analysis of how input structure affects parametric knowledge acquisition during DAPT. Additionally, we propose a prompt-based input normalization method that converts diverse inputs into coherent natural sentences, providing a reference for isolating structural effects. Our experiments show that LLMs acquire substantially more knowledge from natural sentences than from their structurally non-standard counterparts. These findings underscore the importance of structure-aware evaluation in diagnosing learning challenges and guiding effective domain adaptation strategies.

Abstract:
Reliable financial reasoning requires knowing not only how to answer, but also when an answer cannot be justified. In real financial practice, problems often rely on implicit assumptions that are taken for granted rather than stated explicitly, causing problems to appear solvable while lacking enough information for a definite answer. We introduce RealFin, a bilingual benchmark that evaluates financial reasoning by systematically removing essential premises from exam-style questions while keeping them linguistically plausible. Based on this, we evaluate models under three formulations that test answering, recognizing missing information, and rejecting unjustified options, and find consistent performance drops when key conditions are absent. General-purpose models tend to over-commit and guess, while most finance-specialized models fail to clearly identify missing premises. These results highlight a critical gap in current evaluations and show that reliable financial models must know when a question should not be answered. The dataset and code are available athttps://github.com/insait-institute/RealFin.

Abstract:
Current benchmarks for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) primarily rely on answer correctness, failing to assess the structural coherence and cognitive soundness of the reasoning process itself. To address this gap, we introduce Cognitive Hierarchy Trace (CHT), a novel evaluation framework grounded in Bloom’s Cognitive Taxonomy (BCT). CHT provides a structured, step-wise mapping of a model’s reasoning trajectory onto hierarchical cognitive levels, enabling the detection of structural anomalies such as hierarchy jumps, breaks, and overthinking. Based on CHT, we present BloomEval, the first large-scale benchmark designed for fine-grained cognitive capability assessment. It comprises 94,602 math problems, each annotated with Bloom’s cognitive levels, CHT trajectories, a three-tier knowledge hierarchy, and problem difficulty. To ensure scalable yet reliable annotation, we develop an Expert-LLM collaborative pipeline with a three-stage reconciliation mechanism. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals a critical finding: models often arrive at correct answers through cognitively flawed or opaque reasoning paths. The CHT-based analysis uncovers prevalent structural inconsistencies that are invisible to outcome-only metrics, demonstrating that answer accuracy is an insufficient proxy for reasoning quality.

Abstract:
Accurate estimation of item (question or task) difficulty is critical for educational assessment but suffers from the cold start problem. While Large Language Models demonstrate superhuman problem-solving capabilities, it remains an open question whether they can perceive the cognitive struggles of human learners. In this work, we present a large-scale empirical analysis of Human-AI Difficulty Alignment for over 20 models across diverse domains such as medical knowledge and mathematical reasoning. Our findings reveal a systematic misalignment where scaling up model size is not reliably helpful; instead of aligning with humans, models converge toward a shared machine consensus. We observe that high performance often impedes accurate difficulty estimation, as models struggle to simulate the capability limitations of students even when being explicitly prompted to adopt specific proficiency levels. Furthermore, we identify a critical lack of introspection, as models fail to predict their own limitations. These results suggest that general problem-solving capability does not imply an understanding of human cognitive struggles, highlighting the challenge of using current models for automated difficulty prediction.

Abstract:
Despite significant advances in large language models, personalizing them for individual decision-makers remains an open problem. Here, we introduce a synthetic-organic supervision pipeline that transforms raw judicial decisions into instruction-tuning data, enabling parameter-efficient fine-tuning of personalized models for individual judges in low-resource settings. We compare our approach to state-of-the-art personalization techniques across three different tasks and settings. The results show that Causal Language Modeling followed by synthetically generated instruction-tuning significantly outperforms all other baselines, providing significant improvements across lexical, stylistic, and semantic similarity. Notably, our model-generated outputs are indistinguishable from the reasoning of human judges, highlighting the viability of efficient personalization, even in low-resource settings.

Abstract:
Recent advances in vision–language models (VLMs) have expanded their multimodal code generation capabilities, yet their ability to generate executable visualization code from plots, especially for complex 3D, animated, plot-to-plot transformations, or multi-library scenarios, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce PlotGen-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating plot-to-code generation under realistic and complex visualization scenarios. The benchmark spans 9 major categories, 30 subcategories, and 3 core tasks—plot replication, plot transformation, and multi-library generation, covering both 2D, 3D and animated plots across 5 widely used visualization libraries. Through systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art open- and closed-source VLMs, we find that open-source models still lag considerably behind in visual fidelity and semantic consistency, despite achieving comparable code executability. Moreover, all models exhibit substantial degradation on reasoning-intensive tasks such as chart type conversion and animation generation. PlotGen-Bench establishes a rigorous foundation for advancing research toward more capable and reliable VLMs for visualization authoring and code synthesis, with all data and code available at https://plotgen.github.io.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have raised hopes for automated end-to-end fact-checking, but prior studies report mixed results. As mainstream chatbots increasingly ship with reasoning capabilities and web search tools—and millions of users already rely on them for verification—rigorous evaluation is urgent. We evaluate 15 recent LLMs from OpenAI, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek on more than 6,000 claims fact-checked by PolitiFact, comparing standard models with reasoning- and web-search variants. Standard models perform poorly, reasoning offers minimal benefits, and web search provides only moderate gains, despite fact-checks being available on the web. In contrast, a curated RAG system using PolitiFact summaries improved macro F1 by 233% on average across model variants. These findings suggest that giving models access to curated high-quality context is a promising path for automated fact-checking.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for code editing, yet the prevalent full-code generation paradigm suffers from severe efficiency bottlenecks, posing challenges for interactive coding assistants that demand low latency and cost. Despite the predominant focus on scaling model capabilities, the edit format itself has been largely overlooked in model training. In this paper, we begin with a systematic study of conventional diff formats and reveal that fragile offsets and fragmented hunks make generation highly unnatural for LLMs. To address it, we introduce BlockDiff and FuncDiff, two structure-aware diff formats that represent changes as block-level rewrites of syntactically coherent units such as control structures and functions. Furthermore, we propose AdaEdit, a general adaptive edit strategy that trains LLMs to dynamically choose the most token-efficient format between a given diff format and full code. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AdaEdit paired with structure-aware diff formats consistently matches the accuracy of full-code generation, while reducing both latency and cost by over 30% on long-code editing tasks.

Abstract:
Question-Answer Generation (QAG) is essential for alleviating the cold-start problem in domain-specific large language model (LLM) post-training, where high-quality data is severely scarce.Effective training samples include rich semantic diversity and rigorous factual consistency.Thus, it is necessary to consider the inherent tension between semantic breadth and factual fidelity.However, it is extremely challenging to trade off semantic diversity against factual consistency, in that generalization across the semantic space must be achieved effectively and reliably, and factual integrity must be ensured as well.To address this issue, we propose an effective framework, namely DiFRa, that integrates continuous concept diffusion with discrete knowledge graph constraints to balance semantic diversity and factual consistency.Specifically, the proposed DiFRa models discrete concepts as a continuous latent distribution to sample embeddings that capture rich semantic variations, and constructs a refined knowledge graph as explicit factual constraints.Then, a diversity and consistency aware mechanism is designed to dynamically integrate both embeddings and the knowledge graph for QA pairs generation.Furthermore, we introduce SeFa, which harmonizes semantic entropy and consistency scores to quantify the trade-off between diversity and correctness.Extensive experiments demonstrate that DiFRa consistently outperforms the baseline models, validating its efficacy in reconciling the tension to generate semantically diverse and factually consistent QA pairs. The source code is publicly available.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved good performance in multiple reasoning tasks. However, they are limited to adapt the rapid knowledge updates in the real-world scenario without retraining the entire LLM or modifying the model weights. Excluding these consuming methods, knowledge graphs (KGs) are used as external memory under knowledge updating because of their structural knowledge and efficient updating ability, which is yet limited by the gap between structural KG and LLM, and the deficient entity-independent semantics. To this end, we propose an LLM reasoning framework with hierarchical relational retrieval for large-scale knowledge updating, named G-HiRel. To integrate the structural edited KG into continuous LLMs, G-HiRel generates hierarchical instructions based on natural language questions. In order to handle the knowledge inconsistency between the KG and LLM and obtain the entity independence, G-HiRel utilizes a designed hierarchical relational retrieval for relational path candidates, which are selected by a designed semantics-based strategy. Finally, top entity-independent relational paths are instantiated and integrated into LLMs to generate the answer, in order to verify the reasoning performance under knowledge edits. Extensive experiments of G-HiRel on three benchmarks show that G-HiRel achieves superiority in terms of accuracy and interpretability. The code of G-HiRel is available at the link: https://github.com/HJJ-designed/G-HiRel.

Abstract:
Self-consistency (SC) is a popular technique for improving the reasoning accuracy of large language models by aggregating multiple sampled outputs, but it comes at a high computational cost due to extensive sampling. We introduce a hybrid ensembling approach that leverages the complementary strengths of two distinct modes of reasoning: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT). We describe a general framework for combining these two forms of reasoning in self-consistency, as well as particular strategies for both full sampling and early-stopping. We show that CoT-PoT ensembling not only improves overall accuracy, but also drastically reduces the number of samples required for SC by a factor of 9.3x. In particular, the majority of tasks (78.6%) can be addressed with only two samples, which has not been possible with any prior SC methods.

Abstract:
Hallucination detection has attracted increasing attention, particularly in long-form text generation, where language models are more prone to producing factually inaccurate content. Prior studies reveal two limitations: (1) current benchmarks focus on short-form content, lacking the structural complexity required in long-form scenarios; (2) existing methods are constrained by coarse-grained consistency checks and fail to capture long-range and hyper-relational dependencies. To address these challenges, we provide LHD, a benchmark for long-form hallucination detection that contains diverse entity types and intricate factual dependencies spanning extended contexts. We further propose HRKG-HD, a zero-resource, black-box framework that models responses as fact-centric hyper-relational knowledge graphs and detects hallucinations through relation-aware multi-hop reasoning over these graphs. By linking distant facts through shared entities and qualifiers, this design enables a global and dependency-aware verification of factual consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HRKG-HD not only outperforms existing baselines but also exhibits robust and consistent performance across various LLMs.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is a common practice to adapt generalist models to specialized domains. However, recent studies show that fine-tuning can erode safety alignment, causing LLMs to respond to harmful or unethical prompts. Many methods to realign safety have been proposed, but often introduce custom algorithms that are difficult to implement or compromise task utility. In this work, we propose SafeMERGE, a lightweight, post-fine-tuning framework that restores safety while maintaining downstream performance. SafeMERGE selectively merges fine-tuned with safety-aligned model layers only when they deviate from safe behavior, measured by a cosine similarity criterion. Across four LLMs and several tasks, SafeMERGE consistently reduces harmful outputs compared to other defenses, with negligible or even positive impact on utility. Our results demonstrate that selective, layer-wise merging offers a robust safeguard against the inadvertent loss of safety during fine-tuning, establishing SafeMERGE as a simple yet effective post-fine-tuning defense.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly succeed on competitive programming problems, yet existing evaluations conflate algorithmic reasoning with code-level implementation. We argue that competitive programming is fundamentally a problem-solving task and propose centering natural-language editorials in both solution generation and evaluation. Generating an editorial prior to code improves solve rates for some LLMs, with substantially larger gains when using expertly written gold editorials. However, even with gold editorials, models continue to struggle with implementation, while the gap between generated and gold editorials reveals a persistent problem-solving bottleneck in specifying correct and complete algorithms. Beyond pass/fail metrics, we diagnose reasoning errors by comparing model-generated editorials to gold standards using expert annotations and validate an LLM-as-a-judge protocol for scalable evaluation. We introduce a dataset of 83 ICPC-style problems with gold editorials and full test suites, and evaluate 19 LLMs, arguing that future benchmarks should explicitly separate problem solving from implementation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are highly capable of answering questions, but they are often unaware of their own knowledge boundary, i.e., knowing what they know and what they don’t know. As a result, they can generate factually incorrect responses on topics they do not have enough knowledge of, commonly known as hallucination. Rather than hallucinating, a language model should be more honest and respond with "I don’t know" when it does not have enough knowledge about a topic. Many methods have been proposed to improve LLM honesty, but their evaluations lack robustness, as they do not take into account the knowledge that the LLM has ingested during its pretraining. In this paper, we propose a more robust evaluation benchmark dataset for LLM honesty by utilizing Pythia, a truly open LLM with publicly available pretraining data. In addition, we also propose a novel method for harnessing the pretraining data to build a more honest LLM.

Abstract:
Building datasets for dialogue tasks is expensive and time-consuming, requiring recruitment, training, and data collection from study participants. In response, much recent work has sought to use large language models (LLMs) to simulate both human-human and human-LLM interactions, as they have been shown to generate convincingly human-like text in many settings. However, how well do LLM-based simulations reflect real human dialogue? In this work, we answer this question by generating a large-scale dataset of 100,000 paired LLM-LLM and human-LLM dialogues from the WildChat dataset and quantifying how well the LLM simulations align with their human counterparts. Overall, we find relatively low alignment between simulations and human interactions, with systematic differences in multiple textual properties, including style and conversational dynamics. Further, we find that models perform similarly in simulating English, Chinese, and Russian dialogues. Our results also suggest that LLMs only simulate a narrow range of the overall distribution of human dialogue, as they perform better on the subset of humans who write similarly to the LLM’s own style.

Abstract:
Quality management when creating large-scale speech datasets is essential for building reliable downstream models, yet verification pipelines are often brittle, domain-specific, and expertise-intensive. We introduce SpeechQM-Agent , a natural language-driven agentic framework that compiles user requirements into dependency-aware DAG workflows over modular tools for audio, transcript, and metadata verification. A central planner LLM enforces prerequisites and supports execution-time replanning (e.g., re-running failed steps or swapping tools), reducing manual pipeline engineering and improving robustness across heterogeneous vendor formats and multilingual settings. We also release SpeechQM-Dataset , a multilingual benchmark with controlled, vendor-inspired quality artifacts spanning 24 verification tasks. Across experiments, SpeechQM-Agent attains 80-90% agreement with expert verification while requiring <20% of the cost and time of manual QC, and we further validate transfer to real vendor-supplied corpora. Planner LLM comparisons highlight fidelity-efficiency trade-offs.

Abstract:
We study how well LLMs can determine whether two programs are functionally equivalent. This is an important problem because benchmarking code equivalence helps assess LLM capability in tasks such as code rewriting and translation. To this end, we introduce CETBench — Code Equivalence with Transformations Benchmark — built from a repository of programs that may solve the same or different tasks. Each dataset instance is created by sampling a program pair and applying a random sequence of predefined code transformations, yielding either equivalent or non-equivalent pairs. Our analysis shows that even simple transformations cause a significant performance drop in state-of-the-art LLMs on code-equivalence checking. These challenges are further amplified in the cross-lingual setting when comparing programs written in different languages. To remedy this, we present a simple fine-tuning-based approach to boost LLM performance on the transformed pairs of programs. Our approach for dataset generation is generic, supporting cross-lingual equivalence checking, the generation of program pairs with varying difficulty levels, and the application of diverse transformations. In our experiments, we perform ablations over the difficulty level of original programs, as well as the kind of transformations used in generating pairs for equivalence checking. Our analysis presents deep insights into the working of LLMs for the task of code-equivalence, and points to the fact that they may still be far from what could be termed as a semantic understanding of the underlying code.

Abstract:
In simultaneous interpretation (SI), interpreters perform real-time translation by segmenting the source speech into chunks and translating them in the order they appear.Since surface-matching metrics such as BLEU correlate poorly with human evaluations, translation quality is often evaluated using neural metrics that measure semantic similarity, such as COMET.However, while SI translation ideally exhibits high monotonicity, COMET tends to assign higher scores to offline translations with long-distance reordering, because it is trained on such offline translation data.To address this gap, we propose Simul-COMET, a variation of COMET adapted for SI evaluation specifically designed for monotonicity.We train Simul-COMET on the SI-style translation data, which was converted from the offline translation of the COMET training data by leveraging large language models.In English–Japanese translation experiments, we demonstrate that Simul-COMET assigns higher scores to SI-style translations than to offline ones.Moreover, Simul-COMET shows stronger alignment with evaluation scores provided by professional interpreters than the original COMET.Simul-COMET is available at https://github.com/kosuked/simul-comet.

Abstract:
Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to infer others’ mental states from behavior, is pivotal for developing machines with human-level social intelligence. Existing methods endowing LLMs with ToM fall into two paradigms: training-free methods and those repurposing ToM evaluation benchmarks as training data for RL-based fine-tuning. However, training-free methods fail to internalize the augmented ToM into the LLMs. Meanwhile, using evaluation benchmarks as training sources is conceptually problematic and, in practice, results in narrow in-domain overfitting rather than robust ToM. To address the lack of training resources within the ToM community and to empower LLMs with robust ToM, we introduce ToM-Synth, a factorial combinatorial synthesis framework of 6912 social units. This framework enables the systematic synthesis of ToM data, yielding a training dataset of 27,648 instances, termed ToM-Synth-27K. Utilizing ToM-Synth-27K for RL fine-tuning, experimental results demonstrate consistent and significant improvements across models of varying families and scales on ToM, Emotional Intelligence, and Social Commonsense benchmarks. Furthermore, we observe concurrent enhancements in IQ-related tasks (math, science, logic) and effective performance scaling with increasing data scale.

Abstract:
Recent work suggests that LLMs "know what they don’t know", positing that hallucinated and factually correct outputs arise from distinct internal processes and can therefore be distinguished using internal signals.However, hallucinations have multifaceted causes: beyond simple knowledge gaps, they can emerge from training incentives that encourage models to exploit statistical shortcuts or spurious associations learned during pretraining.In this paper, we argue that when LLMs rely on such learned associations to produce hallucinations, their internal processes are mechanistically similar to those of factual recall, as both stem from strong statistical correlations encoded in the model’s parameters.To verify this, we propose a novel taxonomy categorizing hallucinations into Unassociated Hallucinations (UHs), where outputs lack parametric grounding, and Associated Hallucinations (AHs), which are driven by spurious associations. Through mechanistic analysis, we compare their computational processes and hidden-state geometries with factually correct outputs.Our results show that hidden states primarily reflect whether the model is recalling parametric knowledge rather than the truthfulness of the output itself. Consequently, AHs exhibit hidden-state geometries that largely overlap with factual outputs, rendering standard detection methods ineffective. In contrast, UHs exhibit distinctive, clustered representations that facilitate reliable detection.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in solving mathematical problems expressed in natural language. However, multilingual and culturally-grounded mathematical reasoning in low-resource languages lags behind English due to the scarcity of socio-cultural task datasets that reflect accurate native entities such as person names, organization names, and currencies. Existing multilingual benchmarks are predominantly produced via translation and typically retain English-centric entities, owing to the high cost associated with human annotator-based localization. Moreover, automated localization tools are limited, and hence, truly localized datasets remain scarce. To bridge this gap, we introduce a framework for LLM-driven cultural localization of math word problems that automatically constructs datasets with native names, organizations, and currencies from existing sources. We find that translated benchmarks can obscure true multilingual math ability under appropriate socio-cultural contexts. Through extensive experiments, we also show that our framework can help mitigate English-centric entity bias and improve robustness when native entities are introduced across various languages.

Abstract:
ACL removed the anonymity period for conference submissions in February 2024, allowing unrestricted preprinting during review.To examine how preprints and author recognition affect outcomes across institutional hierarchies, we track preprinting trends for 47k publications, survey 75 NLP researchers, interview 14 community members, and analyze 1.9k peer reviews. We observe that more elite institutions post preprints more frequently (52% vs. 36% by 2025). Most participants agree that preprinting gives these institutions an advantage in peer review, and indeed, reviewer knowledge of authors inflates scores at elite institutions ( d = 0.43 , p < 0.001 ) but not elsewhere, also lowering review quality. Nonetheless, the anonymity period was found largely ineffective; instead, underrepresented researchers emphasize struggles with visibility, review quality, and external structural barriers. To counteract these inequities, we make recommendations for review quality improvement and increasing investment in diversity initiatives that center the perspectives of affected communities.

Abstract:
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) for children remains challenging due to developmental variability and the scarcity of high-quality corpora, especially for Mandarin and its dialects. In this paper, we present ChildTalk, a large-scale Chinese child speech corpus designed to address this gap. It contains 112.5 hours of speech from 498 children (aged 2–8) and 500 caregivers, recorded as natural child–caregiver conversations. Unlike prior Mandarin child ASR corpora that mainly release isolated utterances, ChildTalk provides full-length dialogues with complete transcriptions, preserving turn-taking and discourse context. To our knowledge, it is the first publicly available Mandarin child speech corpus with full-length dialogues and systematic coverage of standard Mandarin, eight Mandarin dialect subgroups, and two additional dialects (Southern Min and Jin). We benchmark end-to-end models trained from scratch, large pre-trained ASR models fine-tuned on ChildTalk, omni-modal LLMs in a zero-shot setting, and commercial speech transcription APIs. Fine-tuning on ChildTalk consistently improves both in-domain and cross-domain performance. These results indicate that ChildTalk provides a challenging, broad-coverage testbed for Chinese child ASR, dialect robustness, and dialogue-level modeling. The dataset will be made freely available for all academic purposes.

Abstract:
Full-Duplex Speech Language Models (FD-SLMs) enable real-time, overlapping conversational interactions, offering a more dynamic user experience compared to traditional half-duplex models. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on evaluating single-round interactions, neglecting the complexities of multi-round communication. Evaluating FD-SLMs in multi-round settings poses significant challenges, including blurred turn boundaries in communication and context inconsistency during model inference. Also, existing benchmarks often focus solely on evaluating conversational features, neglecting other critical aspects. To address these gaps, we introduce MTR-DuplexBench, a novel benchmark designed for a comprehensive multi-round evaluation of FD-SLMs. MTR-DuplexBench not only segments continuous full-duplex dialogues into discrete turns for turn-by-turn assessment but also incorporates various evaluation aspects, including conversational features, dialogue quality, instruction following, and safety. Experimental results reveal that current FD-SLMs face difficulties in maintaining consistent performance across multiple rounds and evaluation dimensions, highlighting the necessity and effectiveness of our benchmark.

Abstract:
Chinese historical documents encode millennia of cultural heritage, yet remain largely inaccessible to computational analysis. While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on modern document OCR, their application to historical Chinese texts suffers from severe hallucinations, character fabrication, uncontrolled repetition, and semantic drift. We identify the root cause as visual-textual misalignment: models prioritize linguistic priors over visual evidence, particularly problematic when archaic orthography and degraded image quality destabilize cross-modal correspondences. To address this, we propose HisDoc-OCR, which restores visual grounding through three synergistic strategies: (1) Layout Injection, which encodes two-dimensional layout structures into textual outputs using layout-aware delimiters; (2) First-Occurrence Boost, which emphasizes vision-dependent characters during training by reweighting first-occurrence characters; (3) Self-Distilled Attention Focusing, which guides the model’s attention by distilling patterns from the most focused layer to the remaining layers. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HisDoc-OCR consistently outperforms general-purpose and OCR-specific MLLMs. The code will be publicly available.

Abstract:
In today’s data-driven era, fully automated end-to-end data analytics, particularly insight discovery, is critical for discovering actionable insights that assist organizations in making effective decisions. With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), LLM-driven agents have emerged as a promising paradigm for automating insight discovery. However, existing data insight agents remain limited in several key aspects, often failing to deliver satisfactory results due to: (1) insufficient utilization of domain knowledge, (2) shallow analytical depth, and (3) error-prone code generation. To address these issues, we propose DataSage, a novel multi-agent framework that incorporates three innovative features including external knowledge retrieval to enrich the analytical context, a multi-role debating mechanism to simulate diverse analytical perspectives and deepen analytical depth, and multi-path reasoning to improve the accuracy of the generated code and insights. Extensive experiments on InsightBench demonstrate that DataSage consistently outperforms existing data insight agents across all difficulty levels, improving by 7.5% and 13.9% respectively in the insight-level and summary-level metrics. It offers an effective solution for automated data insight discovery.

Abstract:
LLMs have become foundational across many NLP applications, driving a shift from an algorithm-centric to a context-centric paradigm. As an important task in text mining, the landscape of topic modeling (TM) is similarly being reshaped by a growing body of LLM-driven research.We review recent TM developments and categorize existing methods into three groups: Classical Algorithm-Centric, LLM-Assisted, and LLM-Centric. For traditional algorithm-centric methods, we refine prior taxonomies and highlight recent advances. For the LLM-Assisted and LLM-Centric settings, we introduce a new taxonomy that emphasizes the role of LLMs and the design of end-to-end workflows, respectively. We examine two key transformations brought by LLM-centric TM: expanded task scope and a shift from model-level improvements to system-level engineering. We also propose a future roadmap for more optimized LLM-Centric TMs and identify ongoing critical challenges. We aim for this survey to spur closer integration between TM and LLMs and to further drive the progress of modern TM.

Abstract:
The rapid development of LLMs has significantly advanced tabular question answering, but most systems cannot perform future-oriented numerical prediction. To address this gap, we introduce a novel task, Open-Domain Tabular Question Answering for Future Data Forecasting and Reasoning, and propose the first dataset to cover time-series forecasting and forecast-based reasoning scenarios using real estate data. This task poses challenges in retrieving precise historical data, overcoming the forecasting limitations of LLMs, and standardizing responses for diverse queries. To solve the above challenges, we propose TimeFore, an LLM agent-based framework that decomposes the problem into three collaborative roles: a Retriever autonomously generates SQL to fetch data, a Forecaster invokes external time-series models for higher accuracy, and an Analyzer synthesizes the results to construct a precise and consistent final answer. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our TimeFore.

Abstract:
Visual token pruning has emerged as a pivotal strategy to alleviate the computational bottleneck in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet it frequently compromises the integrity of visual understanding in pursuit of efficiency. Existing methods face a fundamental tension: vision-centric approaches are susceptible to the attention sink phenomenon and operate in a query-agnostic manner, whereas text-guided methods often create an overly narrow focus, discarding essential background context and failing on ambiguous queries. In this paper, we propose CrisPrune, a training-free and model-agnostic method that reconciles efficiency with understanding by integrating visual saliency and text relevance. Specifically, we introduce intrinsic visual saliency with robust normalization to identify information-rich regions characterized by significant visual features. Simultaneously, we design dual-source text relevance to synergize explicit instruction alignment with implicit scene priors. Finally, we reformulate the selection process using a Determinantal Point Process (DPP) to balance token quality and spatial diversity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CrisPrune significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods. On LLaVA-NeXT, it achieves a 13 × decrease in FLOPs while maintaining 97% of the original performance with 94.4% of visual tokens pruned, effectively bridging the gap between efficiency and holistic understanding.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate fluent and convincing responses, they are not necessarily correct. This is especially apparent in the popular decompose-then-verify factuality evaluation pipeline, where LLMs evaluate generated text by decomposing it into individual, valid claims. Factuality evaluation is especially important for medical answers, since incorrect medical information could seriously harm the patient. However, existing factuality systems are a poor match for the medical domain, as they are typically only evaluated on objective, entity-centric, formulaic texts such as biographies and historical topics. This differs from condition-dependent, conversational, hypothetical, sentence-structure diverse, and subjective medical answers, making decomposition into valid facts challenging. We propose MedScore, a new pipeline to decompose medical answers into condition-aware valid facts and verify against in-domain corpora. Our method extracts up to three times as many valid facts as existing methods, reducing hallucination and vague references, and retaining condition-dependency in facts. We also find MedScore is generalizable to non-medical domains without any specific tuning. The resulting factuality score substantially varies by decomposition method, verification corpus, and used backbone LLM, highlighting the importance of customizing each step for reliable factuality evaluation by using our generalizable and modularized pipeline for domain adaptation.

Abstract:
Large Speech Language Models (LSLMs) typically operate at high token rates (tokens/s) to ensure acoustic fidelity, yet this results in sequence lengths that far exceed the underlying semantic content, incurring prohibitive inference costs. In this paper, we empirically revisit the necessity of such granular token-level processing. Through layer-wise oracle interventions, we unveil a structured redundancy hierarchy: while shallow layers encode essential acoustic details, deep layers exhibit extreme redundancy, allowing for aggressive compression. Motivated by these findings, we introduce Affinity Pooling, a training-free, similarity-based token merging mechanism. By strategically applying this method at both input and deep layers, we effectively compress speech representations without compromising semantic information. Extensive evaluations across three tasks demonstrate that our approach reduces prefilling FLOPs by 27.48% while maintaining competitive accuracy. Practical deployment further confirms significant efficiency gains, yielding up to ∼ 1.7 × memory savings and ∼ 1.1 × faster time-to-first-token on long utterances. Our results challenge the necessity of fully distinct token representations, providing new perspectives on LSLM efficiency.

Abstract:
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) hold significant promise for revolutionizing traditional education and reducing teachers’ workload. However, accurately interpreting unconstrained STEM student handwritten solutions with intertwined mathematical formulas, diagrams, and textual reasoning poses a significant challenge due to the lack of authentic and domain-specific benchmarks. Additionally, current evaluation paradigms predominantly rely on the outcomes of downstream tasks (e.g., auto-grading), which often probe only a subset of the recognized content, thereby failing to capture the MLLMs’ understanding of complex handwritten logic as a whole. To bridge this gap, we release EDU-CIRCUIT-HW, a dataset consisting of 1,300+ authentic student handwritten solutions from a university-level STEM course. Utilizing the expert-verified verbatim transcriptions and grading reports of student solutions, we simultaneously evaluate various MLLMs’ upstream recognition fidelity and downstream auto-grading performance. Our evaluation uncovers an astonishing scale of latent failures within MLLM-recognized student handwritten content, highlighting the models’ insufficient reliability for auto-grading and other understanding-oriented applications in high-stakes educational settings. In response, we present a case study demonstrating that leveraging identified error patterns to preemptively detect and rectify recognition errors, with only minimal human intervention (e.g., with 3.3% assignments routed to human graders while the rest to GPT-5.1 grader), can effectively enhance the robustness of the deployed AI-enabled grading system on unseen student solutions.

Abstract:
Visual RAG has offered an alternative to traditional RAG. It treats documents as images and uses vision encoders to obtain vision patch tokens. However, hundreds of patch tokens per document create retrieval and storage challenges in a vector database. Practical deployment requires aggregating them into a single vector. This raises a critical question: does single-vector aggregation lose key information in financial documents? We develop a diagnostic benchmark using financial documents where changes in single digits can lead to significant semantic shifts. Our experiments show that single-vector aggregation collapses different documents with almost identical vectors. Metrics show that the patch level detects semantic changes, and confirm that aggregation obscures these details. We identify global texture dominance as the root cause. Our findings are consistent across model scales, retrieval-optimized embeddings, and multiple mitigation strategies, highlighting significant risks for single-vector visual document retrieval in financial applications.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance on diverse downstream and domain-specific tasks via parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). However, existing PEFT methods, particularly MoE-LoRA architectures, suffer from limited parameter efficiency and coarse-grained adaptation due to the proliferation of LoRA experts and instance-level routing. To address these issues, we propose Core Space Mixture of LoRA ( CoMoL ), a novel MoE-LoRA framework that incorporates expert diversity, parameter efficiency, and fine-grained adaptation. Specifically, CoMoL introduces two key components: core space experts and core space routing. Core space experts store each expert in a compact core matrix, preserving diversity while controlling parameter growth. Core space routing dynamically selects and activates the appropriate core experts for each token, enabling fine-grained, input-adaptive routing. Activated core experts are then merged via a soft-merging strategy into a single core expert, which is combined with a shared LoRA to form a specialized LoRA module. Besides, the routing network is projected into the same low-rank space as the LoRA matrices, further reducing parameter overhead without compromising expressiveness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CoMoL retains the adaptability of MoE-LoRA architectures while achieving parameter efficiency comparable to standard LoRA, consistently outperforming existing methods across multiple tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/DCDmllm/CoMoL .

Abstract:
Task-agnostic backdoor attacks can contaminate pre-trained language models (PLMs) in a way that survives downstream adaptation, even under full fine-tuning, making it difficult for practitioners to trust third-party checkpoints. Existing defenses often rely on privileged assumptions (e.g., access to poisoned data or trigger/target knowledge), thereby limiting their applicability in realistic settings. We present DiSec, a robust and label-efficient purification framework that uses only clean auxiliary text and does not rely on downstream supervision or attack signatures. DiSec elicits model-internal signals from this clean data to separate suspicious parameter components that are inconsistent with benign behavior, and then flags anomalous structures by jointly leveraging complementary spectral and generative views of outliers. Finally, DiSec performs a structure-preserving repair via layer-local prototype-based mean correction, yielding an idempotent update that depends only on non-adversarial statistics. Across diverse downstream classification tasks and PLM backdoor strategies, DiSec substantially suppresses attack success while preserving clean-task utility, offering a practical path to securing fully fine-tuned PLMs before deployment. The codes are publicly available at https://github.com/das-sunanda/DiSec.

Abstract:
Session history is a common way of recording user interacting behaviors throughout a browsing activity with multiple products. For example, if an user clicks a product webpage and then leaves, it might because there are certain features that don’t satisfy the user, which serve as an important indicator of on-the-spot user preferences. However, all prior works fail to capture and model customer intention effectively because insufficient information exploitation and only apparent information like descriptions and titles are used. There is also a lack of data and corresponding benchmark for explicitly modeling intention in E-commerce product purchase sessions. To address these issues, we introduce the concept of an intention tree and propose a dataset curation pipeline. Together, we construct a sibling multimodal benchmark, SessionIntentBench, that evaluates L(V)LMs’ capability on understanding inter-session intention shift with four subtasks. With 1,952,177 intention entries, 1,132,145 session intention trajectories, and 13,003,664 available tasks mined using 10,905 sessions, we provide a scalable way to exploit the existing session data for customer intention understanding. We conduct human annotations to collect ground-truth label for a subset of collected data to form an evaluation gold set. Extensive experiments on the annotated data further confirm that current L(V)LMs fail to capture and utilize the intention across the complex session setting. Further analysis show injecting intention enhances LLMs’ performances.

Abstract:
Customized Large Language Model (LLM) agents face a critical security threat from black-box instruction backdoors, where malicious behaviors are covertly injected through hidden system instructions. Although existing prompt-based defenses can often detect poisoned inputs, they generally fail to recover correct outputs once the backdoor is activated. In this paper, we first conduct a mechanistic analysis of LLM behavior under instruction backdoors and reveal two pivotal phenomena: (1) cognitive override, in which backdoor triggers dominate the reasoning process and suppress task-relevant context, and (2) abnormal semantic correlation, where triggers establish excessively strong semantic associations with attacker-specified target labels. Based on these insights, we propose a S oft L abel mechanism and key-extraction-guided CoT-based defense against I nstruction backdoors in A PIs (SLIP). To counteract the cognitive override, the key-extraction-guided Chain-of-Thought (KCOT) explicitly guides the model to extract task-relevant keywords and phrases rather than only considering the single trigger or overall text semantics. To neutralize the trigger’s abnormal semantic correlation, the soft label mechanism (SLM) quantifies semantic correlations and employs statistical clustering to filter anomalous phrases before aggregating reliable keywords and phrases for prediction. Extensive experiments show that SLIP reduces the average attack success rate to 25.13%, improves clean accuracy to 87.15%, and outperforms state-of-the-art black-box defenses.

Abstract:
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models offer a promising path for scaling model capacity, yet their massive memory footprint poses significant challenges for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. Existing solutions, such as static pruning or dynamic offloading, often struggle to balance model accuracy with inference latency due to irreversible information loss or prohibitive I/O overhead. In this paper, we propose LightMoE, a novel framework for memory-efficient MoE inference that exploits the inherent functional redundancy and temporal locality of expert activation. LightMoE employs a frequency-aware expert initialization strategy to retain a compact core of resident experts and introduces a similarity-based redirection mechanism to compensate for missing experts without incurring I/O costs. Furthermore, it incorporates a lightweight runtime manager that performs coarse-grained, task-level expert replacement to adapt to shifting data distributions. Empirical evaluations on representative edge platforms demonstrate that LightMoE achieves a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off, improving average accuracy by 4.3% over static pruning and 2.4% over dynamic swapping methods, while maintaining inference latency comparable to strictly pruned models.

Abstract:
Translation is a fundamentally value-laden process that requires the translator to make decisions and judgments that have ethical implications. However, even though large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for translation tasks, LLMs have not been systematically examined for their default ethical tendencies or their abilities to employ and prioritize specified ethical approaches in conflicted translation situations. To address this gap, we present ETHICA-MT, a framework for examining ethical reasoning and implementation in LLM-based machine translation. Drawing on diverse ethical approaches from the translation studies literature, we formalize a conceptual framework and construct a multilingual benchmark, ETHICA-MT BENCH, that covers six languages and highlights ethical conflicts arising from competing ethical approaches in a variety of translation scenarios. Our empirical study shows that current models predominantly default to an ethical stance favoring ‘faithful representation’ to the source text, and vary in their ability to implement specified ethics at the expense of others. Finally, we highlight the basic challenges of automatically and manually evaluating the models’ ethical stances.

Abstract:
Reasoning capability is fundamental in enabling Large Language Models to perform complex multi-step inference. By sampling multiple reasoning paths and selecting the most frequent answer, Self Consistency (SC) remains highly effective but fails on challenging tasks where incorrect answers dominate the majority. Inspired by Metropolis Light Transport in physically-based rendering, where discovered high-contribution light paths guide subsequent sampling toward illumination sources, we propose Metropolis Self Consistency and its multi-LLM extension, Metropolis Cross Consistency, a probabilistic self- and cross-consistency verification framework for mathematical reasoning. Our approach employs an accept-reject mechanism to encourage high-quality reasoning paths, concentrating sampling in regions more likely to yield correct answers. Experiments on 9 LLMs across 4 challenging mathematical benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over SC. Even when combining models of vastly different capabilities, MCC maintains performance virtually matching the most capable model while significantly reducing computational cost compared to SC with the strongest model alone. While our implementation is training-free, adds minimal token overhead beyond SC, and requires no external reward model, our approach provides a flexible paradigm that can accommodate any scalar reward representing path correctness.

Abstract:
Despite the remarkable generation capabilities demonstrated by large language models (LLMs), the issue of hallucination remains a critical challenge. This is largely attributed to the models’ tendency to fit spurious dependencies in pre-training data rather than underlying causal logic. To address this, from an information-theoretic perspective, this paper proposes a unified contrastive decoding framework based on dynamic pointwise mutual information (Dynamic PMI). Under this framework, we design three fine-grained input transformation strategies targeting context, syntax, and semantics to construct dynamic background distributions. These strategies systematically disentangle and suppress spurious dependencies induced by context priors, lexical co-occurrences, and syntactic structures, thereby guiding the model to prioritize underlying causal logic. Experiments on extensive discriminative and generative benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly improves the model’s factuality and reasoning robustness. Notably, despite employing a single-model architecture, our framework surpasses state-of-the-art dual-model strategies while maintaining high computational efficiency. Furthermore, the framework exhibits strong cross-model generalizability and effectively alleviates the over-refusal tendency in open-ended generation.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong promise for mining Electronic Health Records (EHRs) by reasoning over longitudinal clinical information to capture context-rich patient trajectories. However, leveraging LLMs for structured EHRs (e.g., standardized diagnosis and medication codes) presents two key challenges. First, translating time-stamped EHR sequences into plain text can obscure both temporal structure and code identities, weakening the ability to capture code co-occurrence and longitudinal regularities. Second, unlike cohort-trained predictive models that learn a shared, task-aligned representation space across patients, LLMs are often applied in a case-isolated inference setting where each patient is processed independently without leveraging population-level patterns. To address these challenges, we introduce RePrompT, a time-aware LLM framework that integrates structured EHR encoders through prompt tuning, without modifying underlying architectures. Specifically, RePrompT recurrently incorporates latent states from prior visits to preserve longitudinal information, and injects population-level information through trainable prompt tokens derived from a cohort-trained, task-aligned EHR encoder. Experiments on MIMIC-III and MIMIC-IV demonstrate that RePrompT consistently outperforms both EHR-based and LLM-based baselines across multiple clinical prediction tasks.

Abstract:
AI design characteristics and human personality traits each impact the quality and outcomes of human-AI interactions. However, their relative and joint impacts are underexplored in imperfectly cooperative scenarios, where people and AI only have partially aligned goals and objectives. This study compares a purely simulated dataset comprising 2,000 simulations and a parallel human subjects experiment involving 290 human participants to investigate these effects across two scenario categories: (1) hiring negotiations between human job candidates and AI hiring agents; and (2) human-AI transactions wherein AI agents may conceal information to maximize internal goals. We examine user Extraversion and Agreeableness alongside AI design characteristics, including Adaptability, Expertise, and chain-of-thought Transparency. Our causal discovery analysis extends performance-focused evaluations by integrating scenario-based outcomes, communication analysis, and questionnaire measures. Results reveal divergences between purely simulated and human study datasets, and between scenario types. In simulation experiments, personality traits and AI attributes were comparatively influential. Yet, with actual human subjects, AI attributes – particularly transparency – were much more impactful. We discuss how these divergences vary across different interaction contexts, offering crucial insights for the future of human-centered AI agents.

Abstract:
Steerable pluralistic alignment aims to enable large language models (LLMs) to reliably adhere to diverse and potentially conflicting human values, particularly when target objectives involve multi-dimensional, compositional values. Current methods largely rely on prompt engineering or reasoning-time guidance, which often results in fragile and non-persistent control once prompts are perturbed or omitted. In this work, we study value-controllable alignment through discrete condition vectors and propose Verifiable-reward-Routed LoRA—a parameter-efficient mixture-of-experts LoRA framework enhanced with conditioned gating. This gating mechanism dynamically directs the flow among multiple LoRA experts based on an input value or moral vector. To ensure that such routing leads to semantically compliant outputs, we formulate post-training as a reinforcement learning problem with verifiable rewards. We further introduce a conditional consistency reward, computed by an external model-based verifier implemented as a lightweight discriminator, and optimize the adapter parameters using GRPO. Experiments on the Touché23-valueEval (value alignment) and MIC (moral alignment) benchmarks, using two 8-billion-parameter backbones, show that our method consistently outperforms prompt-based steering and multi-task PEFT baselines. It attains the highest overall controllability across micro-F1, macro-F1, and Jaccard metrics—a conclusion further reinforced by human pairwise evaluations.

Abstract:
ocial bias in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has become an increasingly important concern. Prompt-based approaches offer a lightweight solution for debiasing; however, existing methods rely heavily on handcrafted prompts that are brittle, highly context-sensitive, and difficult to generalize across tasks, bias types, and multimodal settings. In this work, we propose Historical Reflection-Guided Prompt Optimization (HRPO), an adaptive self-debiasing framework for black-box MLLMs that automatically optimizes task-specific debiasing prompts to suppress stereotypical outputs. To mitigate forgetting during prompt optimization, we introduce Historical Contrastive Self-Reflection (HCSR), which performs contrastive reflection over positive and negative optimization histories, enabling the model to retain effective prompts and avoid redundant exploration, thereby improving optimization efficiency. Experiments on three benchmarks involving eight open-source and two closed-source MLLMs, covering ten singular and two intersectional bias types, demonstrate that HRPO achieves strong debiasing performance while offering improved interpretability, generalization, and robustness. Code is available at: https://github.com/liyingji1996/HRPO.

Abstract:
While vocabulary expansion scaling laws are well-established for high-resource languages, they remain unverified in low-resource settings. This gap is particularly critical for Byte-level BPE (BBPE), where constrained vocabulary sizes often fail to capture the rich morphemes of complex scripts, leading to severe over-segmentation in languages such as Mongolian, Tibetan, and Uyghur. We systematically investigate jointly-scaled trilingual vocabulary for these languages (140 to 195,000 tokens) across BPE (Llama 2) and BBPE (Qwen2.5/3) architectures. Our results reveal that BBPE follows a "decline-then-rise" pattern, requiring a 9,000-token threshold (3,000 per language) to trigger non-linear performance gains and inference acceleration, whereas BPE improves monotonically. Using Pareto Frontier Analysis, we identify an optimal 79,500-token configuration for BBPE that reduces continuous pre-training duration by over 71% across 1.5B to 8B parameter models while consistently enhancing downstream performance.

Abstract:
Humanitarian reports are long, noisy, and multi-topic, making it difficult to consolidate decision-relevant causal evidence. We present a ReliefWeb study (2000–2024) and a two-stage Large Language Model (LLM) pipeline that extracts structured intervention-outcome records with direction and strength attributes. Query-conditioned extraction restricts output to a specified intervention class, reducing retrieval-induced over-extraction, while snippet grounding links each relation to supporting text for auditability and classification. In an expert-annotated dataset of 100 reports, the best closed-source LLM achieved a weighted F1 score of 90.73% with strong cost-efficiency, while Llama-3.1-8B with supervised fine-tuning reached 94.15% weighted F1 score. We further propose context-preserving triangulation that aggregates strength-weighted evidence within disaster × source cells, applies Laplace smoothing and equally weights cells to quantify cross-context convergence via a Level-of-Evidence score. Applied to cash assistance, food-related outcomes show strong positive convergence (LoE=0.865) and stable long-horizon trajectories.

Abstract:
People often encounter role conflicts—social dilemmas where the expectations of multiple roles clash and cannot be simultaneously fulfilled. As large language models (LLMs) increasingly navigate these social dynamics, a critical research question emerges. When faced with such dilemmas, do LLMs prioritize dynamic contextual cues or the learned preferences? To address this, we introduce RoleConflictBench, a novel benchmark designed to measure the contextual sensitivity of LLMs in role conflict scenarios. To enable objective evaluation within this subjective domain, we employ situational urgency as a constraint for decision-making. We construct the dataset through a three-stage pipeline that generates over 13,000 realistic scenarios across 65 roles in five social domains by systematically varying the urgency of competing situations. This controlled setup enables us to quantitatively measure contextual sensitivity, determining whether model decisions align with the situational contexts or are overridden by the learned role preferences. Our analysis of 10 LLMs reveals that models substantially deviate from this objective baseline. Instead of responding to dynamic contextual cues, their decisions are predominantly governed by the preferences toward specific social roles.

Abstract:
Conversational diagnosis prediction requires models to track evolving evidence in streaming clinical conversations and decide when to commit to a diagnosis. Existing medical dialogue corpora are largely dyadic or lack the multi-party workflow and annotations needed for this setting. We introduce an ePCR-grounded, topic-flow-based multi-agent generation pipeline that iteratively plans, generates, and self-refines dialogues with rule-based factual and topic flow checks. The pipeline yields EMSDialog, a dataset of 4,414 synthetic multi-speaker EMS conversations based on a real-world ePCR dataset, annotated with 43 diagnoses, speaker roles, and turn-level topics. Human and LLM evaluations confirm high quality and realism of EMSDialog using both utterance- and conversation-level metrics. Results show that EMSDialog-augmented training improves accuracy, timeliness, and stability of EMS conversational diagnosis prediction. Our datasets and code are publicly available at https://uva-dsa.github.io/EMSDialog

Abstract:
Empathy is key to many professions. In recognition of this, the workshops on computational approaches to subjectivity, sentiment, and social media analysis (WASSA) hosted competitions to evaluate empathy in dialogue. While fine-tuning has proved successful in the competition, there are at least three shortcomings. First, novel metrics for empathy are absent. Second, classical dialogue evaluation metrics require further investigation. Third, the ensemble’s potential remained underdeveloped. To address these issues, we propose the EMPATH framework, which combines fine-tuned models, large language models, classical dialogue evaluation metrics, and a novel metric. The novel metric, ED, encourages the response’s emotional tone to be contextually appropriate. E.g., if the user expresses joy, a cheerful reaction should receive a higher ranking. Furthermore, we introduce a new robust and label-free ensemble strategy, HO, which integrates sub-metrics with the lowest correlation coefficient first. In addition to evaluating on the WASSA benchmark, we test EMPATH’s generalizability using the EmpatheticExchanges dataset (EX). Our experiment results demonstrate that EMPATH yields the best results on the competition dataset, and ablation studies validate our component selection. On EX, the Pearson correlation coefficient for the winner of WASSA 2024 is 0.4066, while EMPATH shows a statistically significant 8% improvement (i.e., 0.4860).

Abstract:
While LLM-based agents can interact with environments via invoking external tools, their expanded capabilities also amplify security risks. Monitoring step-level tool invocation behaviors in real time and proactively intervening before unsafe execution is critical for agent deployment, yet remains underexplored. In this work, we first construct TS-Bench , a novel benchmark for step-level tool invocation safety detection in LLM agents. We then develop a guardrail model, TS-Guard , using multi-task reinforcement learning. The model proactively detects unsafe tool invocation actions before execution by reasoning over the interaction history. It assesses request harmfulness and action–attack correlations, producing interpretable and generalizable safety judgments and feedback. Furthermore, We introduce TS-Flow , a guardrail-feedback-driven reasoning framework for LLM agents, which reduces harmful tool invocations of ReAct-style agents by 65% on average and improves benign task completion by approximately 10% under prompt injection attacks.

Abstract:
Named Entity Recognition (NER) and Relation Extraction (RE) are two fundamental and interdependent tasks in information extraction (IE), aiming to identify entities and relations from unstructured text. Recently, generative methods have become mainstream instead of discriminative methods for IE, especially joint multi-task IE, due to their promising performance and flexibility. For joint NER and RE, existing methods suffer from misalignment between entities and relations, as well as misalignment among relations. To address these issues, we propose AnchorAlign, a novel generative method enhanced by anchor alignment. Specifically, we first introduce an anchor entity selection mechanism to identify key entities in the text as anchor points, which serve as semantic pivots to bridge the two tasks. Then, we design a dual-level anchor alignment module: at the semantic level, we construct a cross-task semantic alignment space to align the semantic representations of anchor entities and their associated relations; at the generation level, we introduce an anchor-guided generation constraint to guide the model to generate entities and relations with strict alignment based on the anchor points. Extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets show that AnchorAlign outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating its effectiveness. Our work provides a new perspective for optimizing the joint modeling of NER and RE, and has potential to be extended to more complex multi-task IE such as NER and Event Extraction (EE).

Abstract:
Multi-round Vision-Language Model (VLM) Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) offer powerful reasoning capabilities but suffer from prohibitive costs due to static panel designs, where all N agents communicate at every T round. This approach is fundamentally inefficient, as it ignores the context-dependent and diminishing marginal utility of specific agents. To address this, we propose Nash-CredMAS , an economic framework that transforms agent selection into a dynamic resource allocation game . Unlike heuristic routing or one-time pruning, our method operates in two phases: (1) Offline Causal Value Learning , where we employ a doubly-robust (AIPW) estimator to train a context-aware value function from biased interaction logs, effectively learning the true marginal contribution of agents; and (2) Online Dynamic Auctions , where agents bid for communication slots based on their predicted utility. We formulate the inference-time selection as a submodular maximization problem under budget constraints, theoretically guaranteeing a (1 - 1/e) -approximation of the optimal coalition via a greedy strategy. Empirically, Nash-CredMAS achieves state-of-the-art results on challenging benchmarks, including MMMU and V-Bench, while reducing token consumption by over 25% compared to static baselines. The system naturally converges to an economic equilibrium where agents actively remain silent when their marginal value does not justify the cost.

Abstract:
Aligning Large Language Models (LLM) to address subjectivity and nuanced preference levels requires adequate flexibility and control, which can be a resource-intensive and time-consuming procedure. Existing training-time alignment methods require full re-training when a change is needed and inference-time ones typically require access to the reward model at each inference step. We introduce MEAV, an inference-time model-editing-based LLM alignment method that learns encoded representations of preference dimensions, called Alignment Vectors (AV). These representations enable dynamic adjusting of the model behavior during inference through simple linear operations. Here, we focus on three gradual response levels across three specialized domains: medical, legal, and financial, exemplifying its practical potential. This new alignment paradigm introduces adjustable preference knobs during inference, allowing users to tailor their LLM outputs while reducing the inference cost by half compared to the prompt engineering approach. Additionally, we find that AVs are transferable across different fine-tuning stages of the same model, demonstrating their flexibility. AVs also facilitate multidomain, diverse preference alignment, making the process 12x faster than the retraining approach.

Abstract:
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong performance by producing extended Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces before answering. However, this paradigm often induces over-reasoning: redundant calculations and circular self-verification that increase computational cost without improving outcomes. Existing evaluations largely emphasize final accuracy or coarse token counts, and lack automated tools to separate essential logic from structural redundancy. We introduce CoTJudger, a graph-driven framework that quantifies reasoning efficiency by converting free-form CoTs into directed dependency graphs and extracting the Shortest Effective Path (SEP) needed to reach a correct solution. This yields an interpretable efficiency signal – how much of a CoT is necessary versus structurally redundant – that is comparable across models and tasks. Evaluating 21 LRMs, CoTJudger reveals pervasive redundancy and surfaces recurring failure modes, including verification obsession and compensatory redundancy. These results provide a practical metric for disentangling reasoning ability from computational waste, enabling more targeted evaluation and diagnosis of LRM efficiency.

Abstract:
The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has redefined Machine Translation (MT), enabling context-aware and fluent translations across hundreds of languages and textual domains. Despite their remarkable capabilities, LLMs often exhibit uneven performance across language families and specialized domains. Moreover, recent evidence reveals that these models can encode and amplify different biases present in their training data, posing serious concerns for fairness, especially in low-resource languages. To address these gaps, we introduce Translation Tangles, a unified framework and dataset for evaluating the translation quality and fairness of open-source LLMs. Our approach benchmarks 24 bidirectional language pairs across multiple domains using different metrics. We further propose a hybrid bias detection pipeline that integrates rule-based heuristics, semantic similarity filtering, and LLM-based validation. We also introduce a high-quality, bias-annotated dataset based on human evaluations of 1,439 translation-reference pairs. The code and dataset are accessible on GitHub: https://github.com/faiyazabdullah/TranslationTangles

Abstract:
The development of practical (multimodal) large language model assistants for Korean weather forecasters is hindered by the absence of a multidimensional, expert-level evaluation framework grounded in authoritative sources. To address this, we introduce K-MetBench, a diagnostic benchmark grounded in national qualification exams. It exposes critical gaps across four dimensions: expert visual reasoning of charts, logical validity via expert-verified rationales, Korean-specific geo-cultural comprehension, and fine-grained domain analysis. Our evaluation of 55 models reveals a profound modality gap in interpreting specialized diagrams and a reasoning gap where models hallucinate logic despite correct predictions. Crucially, Korean models outperform significantly larger global models in local contexts, demonstrating that parameter scaling alone cannot resolve cultural dependencies. K-MetBench serves as a roadmap for developing reliable, culturally aware expert AI agents.

Abstract:
Automated grading of student work is a critical application of AI in education. However, existing benchmarks fall short in evaluating models on realistic, cognitively demanding tasks. Most rely on synthetic, well-structured text inputs, overlooking the multimodal, error-prone, and often handwritten nature of real student responses, especially in K-12 settings. We introduce EduMARS, a multimodal benchmark designed for rubric-aligned evaluation of real Chinese K-12 student answers. The dataset contains over 4,500 authentic responses from high-stakes exams across eight subjects, featuring noisy handwriting,mixed-layout diagrams,mathematical expressions, and narrative reasoning. Each response is meticulously annotated by expert teachers using step-wise scoring rubrics, error classifications, and key-point mappings, providing fine-grained supervision aligned with real-world pedagogical practices. We evaluated existing SOTA MLLMs across the dimensions of final score and the reasoning process of grading, reveals a significant gap between existing SOTA MLLMs and human-level performance. To bridge this performance gap, we propose the Retrieval-Augmented Adaptive-Rubric Grading (RARG), enabling models to emulate expert grading logic by dynamically synthesizing case-specific evaluation schemas. RARG effectively enhances the performance and interpretability of various MLLMs on EduMARS, surpassing in-context learning and chain-of-thought.

Abstract:
While large language models (LLMs) show promise in literary translation, Shijing (The Book of Songs) serves as a rigorous yet under-explored testbed for testing their limits, given its linguistic antiquity and complex poetic constraints. Automated evaluation in this domain is currently hindered by a scarcity of multilingual resources and the inadequacy of existing metrics in capturing both semantic fidelity and aesthetic quality. In this paper, we bridge these gaps by curating a Shijing parallel corpus with line-by-line Chinese-English-German alignments, together with a fine-grained lexical knowledge base (KB) for archaic expressions. Based on these resources, we propose a hybrid evaluation framework that integrates knowledge-driven, rule-based, and LLM-as-judge metrics. Experimental results show that our framework achieves significantly higher human correlation than traditional metrics and demonstrates high statistical stability. By applying this framework to evaluate representative LLMs, we reveal that while top-tier models like Gemini-2.5-Pro and DeepSeek-3.1 show potential, achieving semantic precision and aesthetic sophistication—particularly in lower-resource directions like German—remains a persistent challenge. Our code, lexical KB, and corpus reconstruction protocols are available at https://github.com/ML-KULeuven/ShijingLLMTrans.

Abstract:
Reward Modeling is critical in evaluating and improving the generation of Large Language Models (LLMs). % They are typically trained on high-quality annotated datasets to distinguish between better and worse responses. While numerous recent works have shown its feasibility in improving safety, helpfulness, reasoning, and instruction-following ability, its capability and generalization to open-ended long-context generation is still rarely explored.In this paper, we introduce OpenGenAlign, a framework and a high-quality dataset designed to develop reward models to evaluate and improve hallucination-free, comprehensive, reliable, and efficient open-ended long-context generation. We define four key metrics to assess generation quality and develop an automated pipeline to evaluate the outputs of multiple LLMs across long-context QA, Data-to-Text, and Summarization scenarios using o3, ending up with 33K high-quality preference data with a human agreement rate of 81%. Experimental results first demonstrate that existing reward models perform suboptimally on the held-out benchmark. And Our trained reward model achieves superior performance in the benchmark and effectively improves the generation quality of the policy models using Reinforcement Learning (RL). Additionally, OpenGenAlign could be used for effective guided generation in existing datasets. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the OpenGenAlign could be integrated with reward data from other domains to achieve better performance.

Abstract:
Recent advances in mobile Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents highlight the growing need for comprehensive evaluation benchmarks. While new online benchmarks offer more realistic testing than offline ones, they tend to focus on the agents’ task instruction-following ability while neglecting their reasoning and exploration ability. Moreover, these benchmarks do not consider the random noise in real-world mobile environments. This leads to a gap between benchmarks and real-world environments. To addressing these limitations, we propose MobileBench-OL, an online benchmark with 1080 tasks from 80 Chinese apps. It measures task execution, complex reasoning, and noise robustness of agents by including 5 subsets, which set multiple evaluation dimensions. We also provide an auto-eval framework with a reset mechanism, enabling stable and repeatable real-world benchmarking. Evaluating 13 leading GUI agents on MobileBench-OL shows significant room for improvement to meet real-world requirements. Human evaluation further confirms that MobileBench-OL can reliably measure the performance of leading GUI agents in real environments.

Abstract:
Psychological defenses are strategies, often automatic, that people use to manage distress. Rigid use or overuse of defenses is negatively linked to mental health and shapes what speakers disclose and how they accept or resist help. However, defenses are complex and difficult to reliably measure, particularly in clinical dialogues. We introduce PsyDefConv, a dialogue corpus with help seeker utterances labeled for defense level, and DMRS Co-Pilot, a four-stage pipeline that provides evidence-based pre-annotations. The corpus contains 200 dialogues and 4,709 utterances, including 2,336 help seeker turns, with double-blind labeling reaching Cohen’s kappa of 0.639. In a counterbalanced study, the co-pilot reduced average annotation time by 24.0%. In expert review, it averaged 4.62 for evidence supportiveness, 4.44 for clinical plausibility, and 4.40 for insight on a seven-point scale. Benchmarks with strong large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot and fine-tuning settings demonstrate clear headroom, with the best macro F1-score around 30% and a tendency to overpredict mature defenses. Corpus analyses confirm that mature defenses are most common and reveal emotion-specific deviations. We release the corpus, annotations, code, and prompts to support research on defensive functioning in language.

Abstract:
Tool-use capabilities are vital for Large Language Models (LLMs) in finance, a domain characterized by massive investment targets and data-intensive inquiries. However, existing data synthesis methods typically rely on a reverse synthesis paradigm, generating user queries from pre-sampled tools. This approach inevitably introduces artificial explicitness, yielding queries that fail to capture the implicit, event-driven nature of real-world needs. Moreover, its reliance on static tool sets overlooks the dynamic retrieval process required to navigate massive tool spaces. To address these challenges, we introduce FinToolSyn , a forward synthesis framework designed to generate high-quality financial dialogues. Progressing from persona instruction and atomic tool synthesis to dynamic retrieval dialogue generation, our pipeline constructs a repository of 43,066 tools and synthesizes over 148k dialogue instances, incorporating dynamic retrieval to emulate the noisy candidate sets typical of massive tool spaces. We also establish a dedicated benchmark to evaluate tool-calling capabilities in realistic financial scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate that models trained on FinToolSyn achieve a 21.06% improvement, providing a robust foundation for tool learning in financial scenarios.

Abstract:
Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is critical for extracting actionable product insights from e-commerce reviews. However, most public ABSA benchmarks are restricted to short texts and a limited range of domains, and therefore underrepresent the challenges posed by real-world reviews—where multiple aspects co-occur, colloquial and noisy expressions are common, and evidence must often be aggregated across sentences in long contexts.We introduce E-ABSA20K, a multi-domain dataset of 20K reviews from four product categories (Women’s Bags, Dresses, Cosmetics, and Furniture), annotated with review-level sentiment quads. Compared to existing benchmarks, E-ABSA20K contains substantially longer and more aspect-dense reviews, averaging 63.9 words and 6.0 quads per review. We further propose a two-stage propose-and-verify framework for review-level quadruple extraction (target, aspect, opinion, sentiment). The first stage generates high-recall candidates under strict schema constraints, while the second stage conducts explicit grounding, scope, and modality verification, followed by review-level consolidation to mitigate hallucinations and scope leakage in long reviews. Experiments across multiple Qwen3 model sizes demonstrate that our approach consistently outperforms single-stage prompting (with and without chain-of-thought) as well as competitive ABSA extraction baselines, improving quad-level micro-F1 and robustness on discourse-hard cases such as comparisons and conditionals.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored for clinical question answering and decision support, yet safe deployment critically requires reliable handling of patient measurements in heterogeneous clinical notes. Existing evaluations of LLMs for clinical numerical reasoning provide limited operation-level coverage, restricted primarily to arithmetic computation, and rarely assess the robustness of numerical understanding across clinical note formats. We introduce ClinicNumRobBench, a benchmark of 1,624 context-question instances with ground-truth answers that evaluates four main types of clinical numeracy: value retrieval, arithmetic computation, relational comparison, and aggregation. To stress-test robustness, ClinicNumRobBench presents longitudinal MIMIC-IV vital-sign records in three semantically equivalent representations, including a real-world note-style variant derived from the Open Patients dataset, and instantiates queries using 42 question templates. Experiments on 17 LLMs show that value retrieval is generally strong, with most models exceeding 85% accuracy, while relational comparison and aggregation remain challenging, with some models scoring below 15%. Fine-tuning on medical data can reduce numeracy relative to base models by over 30%, and performance drops under note-style variation indicate LLM sensitivity to format. ClinicNumRobBench offers a rigorous testbed for clinically reliable numerical reasoning. Code and data URL are available on https://github.com/MinhVuong2000/ClinicNumRobBench.

Abstract:
Task vectors, representing directions in model or activation spaces that encode task-specific behaviors, have emerged as a promising tool for steering large language models (LLMs). However, existing approaches typically require fine-tuning or invasive manipulation of internal states, limiting their flexibility and scalability. We propose DeCoVec (Decoding Space based Task Vector), a training-free and non-invasive framework that constructs task vectors directly in the decoding space by leveraging in-context learning (ICL). Specifically, DeCoVec captures the task essence as the difference between the output logit distributions of few-shot and zero-shot prompts, then steers generation by injecting this vector into the decoding process. Experiments across seven LLMs (0.5B–9B) on TruthfulQA, Math-500, and AQUA-RAT show that DeCoVec consistently outperforms standard few-shot baselines, with gains up to +5.50 average accuracy. Further analysis demonstrates that DeCoVec effectively suppresses generation degeneration and logical flaws while exhibiting strong robustness to demonstration ordering, all without incurring additional input token costs. Our method offers a training-free and non-invasive solution for LLM steering without requiring weight updates or auxiliary models.

Abstract:
Automatic detection of fraudulent voice calls is essential for online service platforms but faces significant challenges due to the scarcity of labeled data and the continuous evolution of conversational contexts. Standard supervised methods often fail to generalize, as they tend to overfit to variable background narratives rather than capturing the core deceptive intent. In this paper, we propose a lightweight framework that anchors detection on Semantic Primitives, a set of stable, interpretable evidentiary cues derived from expert knowledge. Our approach decomposes the fraud detection task into two distinct stages: identifying the presence of these predefined semantic signals within the transcript, and deriving a final verdict through a logical combination of the detected cues. By explicitly prioritizing stable evidence over diverse conversational noise, this framework ensures that decisions are based on verifiable fraud tactics rather than spurious correlations. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves superior robustness and efficiency compared to traditional baselines, particularly in scenarios with shifting service contexts.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) accelerates task-specific large language models (LLMs) development, but the resulting proliferation of fine-tuned models incurs substantial memory overhead. Delta compression addresses this by retaining a single pre-trained LLM with multiple compressed delta weights. However, existing methods fail on models fine-tuned with large-scale datasets. We find that larger SFT data scale amplifies delta parameter magnitude, singular values, and entropy, exacerbating compression errors. To tackle this, we propose D-QRELO ( D elta Compression via Q uantization and R sidual Lo w-Rank), a novel training- and data-free delta compression method. It combines coarse-grained one-bit quantization to capture the dominant structure of the delta, followed by compensated residual low-rank approximation to recover fine-grained details from the smaller residual error. Experiments on various LLMs spanning dense and MoE architectures across multiple domains under this challenging setting demonstrate that D-QRELO outperforms existing methods. Moreover, we establish key design principles for delta compression through extensive empirical analysis, demonstrating how task difficulty, architecture, and layer positioning create predictable patterns that can guide optimal compression strategies in production systems.

Abstract:
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown great potential in medical applications, yet existing benchmarks inadequately capture real-world clinical complexity. We introduce MEDSYN, a multilingual, multimodal benchmark of highly complex clinical cases with up to 7 distinct visual clinical evidence (CE) types per case. Mirroring clinical workflow, we evaluate 18 MLLMs on differential diagnosis (DDx) generation and final diagnosis (FDx) selection. While frontier models often match or even outperform human experts on DDx generation, all MLLMs exhibit a much larger DDx–FDx performance gap compared to expert clinicians, indicating a failure mode in synthesis of heterogeneous CE types. Ablations attribute this failure to (i) overreliance on less discriminative textual CE ( e.g. , medical history) and (ii) a cross-modal CE utilization gap. We introduce Evidence Sensitivity to quantify the latter and show that a smaller gap correlates with higher diagnostic accuracy. Finally, we demonstrate how it can be used to guide interventions to improve model performance. https://github.com/jianing-lab/MEDSYN.

Abstract:
Human Label Variation (HLV) refers to legitimate disagreement in annotation that reflects the diversity of human perspectives rather than mere error. Long treated in NLP as noise to be eliminated, HLV has only recently been reframed as a signal for improving model robustness. With the rise of large language models (LLMs) and post-training methods such as human feedback-based alignment, the role of HLV has become increasingly consequential. Yet current preference-learning datasets routinely collapse multiple annotations into a single label, flattening diverse perspectives into artificial consensus. Preserving HLV is necessary not only for pluralistic alignment but also for sociotechnical safety evaluation, where model behavior must be assessed in relation to human interaction and societal context.This position paper argues that preserving HLV as an embodiment of human pluralism must be treated as a Selbstzweck , an intrinsic value in itself. We analyze the limitations of existing preference datasets and propose actionable strategies for incorporating HLV into dataset construction to better preserve pluralistic human values.

Abstract:
LLM-empowered agent simulations are increasingly used to study social emergence, yet the micro-to-macro causal mechanisms behind macro outcomes often remain unclear. This is challenging because emergence arises from intertwined agent interactions and meso-level feedback and nonlinearity, making generative mechanisms hard to disentangle. To this end, we introduce CAMO , an automated Ca usal discovery framework from M icr o behaviors to M acr o Emergence in LLM agent simulations. CAMO converts mechanistic hypotheses into computable factors grounded in simulation records and learns a compact causal representation centered on an emergent target . CAMO outputs a computable Markov boundary and a minimal upstream explanatory subgraph, yielding interpretable causal chains and actionable intervention levers. It also uses simulator-internal counterfactual probing to orient ambiguous edges and revise hypotheses when evidence contradicts the current view. Experiments across four emergent settings demonstrate the promise of CAMO.[The code is available at an anonymous link: .]

Abstract:
Reasoning benchmarks have played a crucial role in the progress of language models. Yet rigorous evaluation remains a significant challenge as static question-answer pairs provide only a snapshot of performance, compressing complex behavior into a single accuracy metric. This limitation is especially true in complex, rule-bound domains such as law, where existing benchmarks are costly to build and ill suited for isolating specific failure modes. To address this, we introduce OpenExempt, a framework and benchmark for diagnostic evaluation of legal reasoning. The OpenExempt Framework uses expert-crafted symbolic representations of U.S. Bankruptcy Code statutes to dynamically generate a large space of natural language reasoning tasks and their machine-computable solutions on demand. This gives users fine-grained control over task complexity and scope, allowing individual reasoning skills to be probed in isolation. Using this system, we construct the OpenExempt Benchmark, a diagnostic benchmark for legal reasoning with 9,765 samples across nine evaluation suites designed to carefully probe model capabilities. Experiments on 13 diverse language models reveal sharp performance cliffs that emerge only under longer reasoning paths and in the presence of obfuscating statements. We release the framework and benchmark publicly to support research aimed at understanding and improving the next generation of reasoning systems.

Abstract:
The behaviors of Large Language Models (LLMs) as artificial social actors are largely underexplored, particularly in unverifiable scenarios where conventional benchmarking has little to help improve their abilities. Thus, examining their behaviors in such scenarios can help understand and improve LLMs’ capabilities of simulating real-world social actors in many tasks such as LLM-empowered social agents. We draw a typical unverifiable scenario–a simplified pull request scenario on GitHub focusing on decision-making based on Activity Overview signal–to investigate how human and LLMs behave. We introduce a systematic method to collect, compare, and reason about human and LLMs’ decisions. Our results reveal that there are both similarities and differences between human and LLMs’ decisions, and proprietary LLMs generally behave more like human than open-source LLMs do. We further find that human and LLMs may rely on different information and reasoning mechanisms in decision-making. Our study thus urges more future work on human and LLMs decision-making in unverifiable environments.

Abstract:
Unit test generation has become a promising and important use case for Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing evaluation benchmarks for LLM unit test generation primarily focus on function- or class-level code (single-file) rather than on more practical, challenging multi-file codebases.To address this limitation, we propose MultiFileTest , a multi-file-level benchmark for unit test generation covering Python, Java, and JavaScript. MultiFileTest features 20 high-quality, moderate-sized projects per language. We evaluate eleven frontier LLMs on MultiFileTest, and the results show that most tested LLMs exhibit moderate performance on MultiFileTest, highlighting the benchmark’s inherent difficulty.We also conduct a thorough error analysis, which shows that even advanced LLMs, such as Gemini 3.0 Pro, exhibit basic yet critical errors, including executability and cascade errors. Motivated by this observation, we further evaluate these frontier LLMs under manual error-fixing and self-error-fixing scenarios to assess their potential when equipped with error-fixing mechanisms.Our dataset is available at MultiFileTest.

Abstract:
In the contemporary epoch of multilingual education, learning idioms provides a fascinating gateway towards creativity, cultural values, historical context, and diverse perspectives inherent to various linguistic traditions. This paper showcases the navigation of retaining figurative and cultural semantics in low-resource Southeast Asian languages such as Hindi, Bengali, and Thai, where culturally rich idioms pose significant obstacles for computational modelling and cross-linguistic transfer due to their deep metaphorical complexity. To tackle such complexity, we present Varnika (वर्णिका) , a reconstructed multimodal idiom corpus comprising 3,533 multilingual idioms, enriched with seven idiomatic tones aligned with both textual and visual representations. Additionally, to infer informative idiomatic understanding, we introduce a Hybrid Mixture-of-Experts (HybridMoE) framework that embeds multiple idiomatic expert opinions while mitigating expert sparsity by integrating outputs from both selected and unselected experts through controlled hybridisation, further augmented with Idiomatic Property Signals via masked multimodal embeddings. To analyse the performance across multiple dimensions, we propose the IDIO-TONE and Idiomatic Validation Score, a three-stage evaluation pipeline measuring (i) literal translation fidelity, (ii) visual- semantic alignment, and (iii) idiomatic meaning retention. Empirical evaluations highlight that HybridMoE achieves 5–6% performance gains across advanced vision language models, demonstrating improved representation of figurative language and culturally embedded meaning in multilingual multimodal settings. Resources are available at (https://github.com/sarmistha-D/Hybrid_MOE).

Abstract:
Robustness evaluation in Question Answering (QA) has predominantly relied on synthetic perturbations that poorly capture natural text evolution in real-world settings, a limitation that becomes more pronounced with the widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in dynamic, user-facing environments. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a framework for automatically evaluating QA models under naturally occurring textual perturbations, replacing context passages with revised counterparts from Wikipedia edit histories. Through extensive evaluation on SQUAD across diverse encoder architectures, we construct two challenging sets where human performance remains stable, yet state-of-the-art LLMs exhibit significant degradation, with performance drops of up to 28.28%. These robustness gaps further generalize to more complex QA scenarios, such as DROP and HOTPOTQA. To mitigate these errors, we show that robustness to natural perturbations can be improved via adversarial training for encoder-only models and in-context demonstrations of perturbed instances for LLMs, though a more generalizable and effective defense strategy remains an open challenge.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has significantly advanced open-domain question answering systems by incorporating external knowledge into large language models. Despite its effectiveness, existing RAG pipelines suffer from critical efficiency limitations. In particular, modern transformer-based generators exhibit quadratic or higher computational complexity with respect to input sequence length and hidden dimensionality, leading to substantial inference latency as model scales and contextual inputs increase. This issue is exacerbated in RAG settings, where retrieved contexts substantially expand the input prompt. To alleviate this challenge, we propose an effective compression-based RAG framework, ConvX, that directly leverages indexed dense representations produced by a retriever, entirely substituting to long text contexts. Our approach expands a single dense representation into a fixed number of memory slots using a lightweight converter to provide rich lexical information. This design enables efficient knowledge integration while significantly reducing input length and computational overhead. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that the proposed model achieves competitive performances compared to the existing state-of-the-art model that uses a large ad-hoc context compressor, while offering substantially improved inference efficiency.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation, standard “System 1” approaches that generate solutions in a single forward pass often hit a performance ceiling on complex algorithmic tasks. Existing iterative refinement strategies attempt to bridge this gap at inference time, yet they predominantly rely on external oracles, execution feedback, or computationally expensive prompt-response cycles. In this work, we propose ReflexiCoder, a novel reinforcement learning (RL) framework that internalizes the structured reasoning trajectory, encompassing initial generation, bug and optimization aware reflection, and self-correction, directly into the model’s weights. Unlike prior methods, ReflexiCoder shifts the paradigm from external-dependent refinement to an intrinsic, fully autonomous self-reflection and self-correction capabilities at inference time. We utilize an RL-only training paradigm with granular reward functions to optimize the entire reflection-correction trajectory, teaching the model how to debug without reliance on ground-truth feedback or execution engines at inference time. Extensive experiments across seven benchmarks demonstrate that our ReflexiCoder-8B establishes a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) among leading open-source models in the 1.5B-14B range, achieving 94.51% (87.20%) on HumanEval (Plus), 81.80% (78.57%) on MBPP (Plus), 35.00% on BigCodeBench, 52.21% on LiveCodeBench, and 37.34% on CodeForces in a single-attempt setting, rivaling or surpassing proprietary models like GPT-5.1. Notably, our framework is significantly more token-efficient than base models, reducing inference-time compute overhead by approximately 40% through disciplined, efficient reasoning and reflection patterns. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/juyongjiang/ReflexiCoder.

Abstract:
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated emergent capabilities in complex reasoning, largely spurred by rule-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) techniques applied during post-training. This has raised the question of whether similar methods can instill more nuanced, human-like social intelligence, such as a Theory of Mind (ToM), in LLMs. This paper investigates whether small- scale LLMs can acquire a robust and generalizable ToM capability through RL with verifiable rewards (RLVR). We conduct a systematic evaluation by training models on various combinations of prominent ToM benchmarks (HiToM, ExploreToM, FANToM) and testing for generalization on held-out benchmarks (e.g., Open- ToM). Our findings indicate that small LLMs struggle to develop a generic ToM capability. While performance on in-distribution tasks improves, this capability fails to transfer to unseen ToM tasks with different characteristics. Even observed out-of-distribution (OOD) performance improvements occur unpredictably across the training run, and don’t generalize across other OOD benchmarks. Furthermore, we conduct analysis to show that the learned behavior is likely a form of narrow overfitting rather than the acquisition of a true, abstract ToM capability.

Abstract:
Evaluating how large language models (LLMs) capture the grammatical structure of low-resource languages remains underexplored. This paper presents the Urdu Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (UrBLiMP)—a diagnostic suite of 5,696 minimal pairs that contrast grammatical acceptability across ten core syntactic and morpho-syntactic phenomena in Urdu. The dataset is constructed from the Urdu Treebank and diverse text corpora, and human validation achieves a 96.1% inter-annotator agreement, confirming its reliability. We evaluate twenty one multilingual LLMs, including LLaMA-3-70B and Gemma-3-27B-PT, and additionally assess the proprietary GPT-4o model using grammar-prompting techniques. GPT-4o (grammar-prompted) attains the highest average accuracy (97.4%), reaching near-human performance on regular phenomena such as aspect agreement and ergativity. However, all models continue to struggle with flexible syntactic patterns like word-order variation and long-distance subject–verb agreement. UrBLiMP provides the first controlled evaluation framework for probing morpho-syntactic competence in Urdu and highlights both the progress and remaining challenges of multilingual and proprietary LLMs in low-resource settings.

Abstract:
We propose a comprehensive framework for constructing multi-turn Text-to-OverpassQL dialogue datasets. Under this framework, we introduce the first multi-turn Text-to-OverpassQL dataset built upon the OverpassNL corpus. Our dataset comprises over 7,800 dialogues, each containing 2 to 4 user utterances, resulting in more than 20,000 individual utterances aligned with executable Overpass queries. To generate high-quality multi-turn dialogues, we design a four-stage pipeline. First, we convert Overpass queries into syntax trees using a custom parser developed based on the official OverpassQL grammar. This enables structural manipulation while preserving syntactic and executable validity. Second, we apply a diverse set of tree-editing templates, including both simple keyword-level changes and complex structural decompositions, to produce multiple valid and diverse Overpass queries. Third, we leverage a prompt-based approach to guide large language models in generating context-aware natural language questions, ensuring increasing inter-turn dependency across the dialogue. Finally, we implement a hybrid filtering strategy that combines manual annotation with model-assisted selection to validate alignment and correctness at scale. In addition to presenting the dataset, we evaluate the performance of several mainstream large language models and demonstrate that our end-to-end baseline model achieves competitive results. This work offers a new benchmark for studying executable semantic parsing and contextual understanding in map-based query tasks.

Abstract:
Instruction following refers to the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs that satisfy all specified constraints. Existing research has primarily focused on constraint categories, offering limited evaluation dimensions and little guidance for improving instruction-following abilities. To address this gap, we introduce MulDimIF, a multi-dimensional constraint framework encompassing three constraint patterns, four constraint categories, and four difficulty levels. Based on this framework, we design a controllable instruction generation pipeline. Through constraint expansion, conflict detection, and instruction rewriting, we construct 9,106 code-verifiable samples. We evaluate 18 LLMs from six model families and find marked performance differences across constraint settings. For instance, average accuracy decreases from 80.82% at Level I to 36.76% at Level IV. Moreover, training with data generated by our framework significantly improves instruction following without compromising general performance. In-depth analysis indicates that these gains stem largely from parameter updates in attention modules, which strengthen constraint recognition and adherence. Code and data are available in https://github.com/Junjie-Ye/MulDimIF.

Abstract:
Named Entity Recognition (NER) plays a fundamental role in information extraction and domain knowledge construction. However, in specialized domains such as wind power fault diagnosis, the scarcity of labeled data makes supervised approaches impractical. Zero-shot NER provides a promising alternative but still struggles with incomplete entity detection and unstable generation boundaries. To address these challenges, we propose ReCoT-NER, a reasoning-enhanced generative framework that integrates Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and recall-oriented loss optimization. The proposed CoT instruction design explicitly decomposes NER into two reasoning stages: entity span detection and entity type classification. This enables the model to follow a structured inference process. In addition, we introduce a recall-oriented loss function that reweights entity and non-entity tokens to mitigate false negatives, encouraging more inclusive entity coverage. Experiments on CrossNER, MIT, and a newly constructed wind-power NER dataset demonstrate that ReCoT-NER consistently improves recall and overall F1 performance across both general and industrial domains. Notably, ReCoT-NER achieves competitive results with just a 77M-parameter model, making it well-suited for low-resource zero-shot settings. The code for our method is publicly available at https://github.com/10637409100/RECOTNER.

Abstract:
Vision Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly integrated into privacy-critical domains, yet existing evaluations of personally identifiable information (PII) leakage largely treat privacy as a static extraction task and ignore how a subject’s online presence—the volume of their data available online—influences privacy alignment. We introduce PII-VisBench, a novel benchmark containing 4,000 unique probes designed to evaluate VLM safety through the continuum of online presence. The benchmark stratifies 200 subjects into four visibility categories: high, medium, low, and zero—based on the extent and nature of their information available online. We evaluate 18 open-source VLMs (0.3B–32B) based on two key metrics: percentage of PII probing queries refused (Refusal Rate) and the fraction of non-refusal responses flagged for containing PII (Conditional PII Disclosure Rate). Across models, we observe a consistent pattern: refusals increase and PII disclosures decrease (9.10% high → 5.34% low) as subject visibility drops. We identify that models are more likely to disclose PII for high-visibility subjects, alongside substantial model-family heterogeneity and PII-type disparities. Finally, paraphrasing and jailbreak-style prompts expose attack- and model-dependent failures, motivating visibility-aware safety evaluation and training interventions.

Abstract:
Inaccuracies in existing or generated clinical text may lead to serious adverse consequences, especially if it is a misdiagnosis or incorrect treatment suggestion. With Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly being used across diverse healthcare applications, comprehensive evaluation through dedicated benchmarks is crucial. However, such datasets remain scarce, especially across diverse languages and contexts. In this paper, we introduce MedErrBench, the first multilingual benchmark for error detection, localization, and correction, developed under the guidance of experienced clinicians. Based on an expanded taxonomy of ten common error types, MedErrBench covers English, Arabic and Chinese, with natural medical cases annotated and reviewed by domain experts. We assessed the performance of a range of general-purpose, language-specific, and medical-domain language models across all three tasks. Our results reveal notable performance gaps, particularly in non-English settings, highlighting the need for clinically grounded, language-aware systems. By making MedErrBench and our evaluation protocols publicly-available, we aim to advance multilingual clinical NLP to promote safer and more equitable AI-based healthcare globally. The dataset is publicly available at: https://github.com/congboma/MedErrBench.

Abstract:
Artificial intelligence has become increasingly prevalent in the legal domain. However, LegalAI systems often struggle with vague user queries that lack essential legal details, leading to suboptimal performance in practical applications. To address this challenge, we propose FactFiller, a novel approach that dynamically generates questionnaires to help users refine their input queries. Our method leverages an iterative training process that collects valuable questionnaires, eliminating the need for human annotation. Additionally, we introduce a "case-law-quiz” cascading retrieval process, ensuring that the generated questions and answer options are directly linked to specific legal provisions. Through the user study and the downstream task experiments, we demonstrate that FactFiller, while remaining easy for non-experts to understand, not only improves the completeness of queries but also ensures the performance of various domain-specific models in downstream legal tasks.

Abstract:
Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation (MERC) relies on integrating heterogeneous signals, yet real-world modality missingness frequently disrupts these systems. We contend that missingness is not merely a loss of data fidelity but a rupture of the fine-grained inter-modal causal chains essential for reasoning. Existing methods, which primarily focus on statistical reconstruction, often fail to bridge these logical gaps, effectively leaving semantic holes. To address this, we propose the Causal-Enhanced Mixture-of-Experts and Hypergraph Network (CaM-HG), employing a "restore-then-mine" paradigm. First, a Causal-Enhanced MoE module conditions experts on historical context to synthesize missing features that are both realistic and causally consistent, thereby patching the broken topology. Subsequently, an Asymmetric Causal Dynamic Hypergraph mines high-order correlations from the restored graph while enforcing strict temporal causality. Experiments on IEMOCAP, CMU-MOSI, and CMU-MOSEI show consistent improvements in terms of WAF1 and accuracy over strong baselines, e.g., surpassing SOTA benchmarks by 1.43% and 1.25% on IEMOCAP. The source code is included in the supplementary material.

Abstract:
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to creative domains, yet their performance in classical Chinese poetry generation and evaluation remains poorly understood. We propose a three-step evaluation framework that combines computational metrics, LLM-as-a-judge assessment, and human expert validation. Using this framework, we evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs across multiple dimensions of poetic quality, including themes, emotions, imagery, form, and style, in the context of Tang poetry (唐诗) generation. Our analysis reveals a critical "echo chamber" effect: LLMs systematically overrate machine-generated poems that mimic statistical patterns yet fail strict prosodic rules, diverging significantly from human expert judgments. These findings underscore the limitations of using LLMs as standalone evaluators for culturally complex tasks, highlighting the necessity of hybrid human-model validation frameworks.

Abstract:
Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs) have achieved expert-level proficiency in interpreting diagnostic imaging. However, current models are predominantly trained on professional literature, limiting their ability to communicate findings in the lay register required for patient-centered care. While text-centric research has actively developed resources for simplifying medical jargon, there is a critical absence of large-scale multimodal benchmarks designed to facilitate lay-accessible medical image understanding. To bridge this resource gap, we introduce MedLayBench-V, the first large-scale multimodal benchmark dedicated to expert-lay semantic alignment. Unlike naive simplification approaches that risk hallucination, our dataset is constructed via a Structured Concept-Grounded Refinement (SCGR) pipeline. This method enforces strict semantic equivalence by integrating Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs) with micro-level entity constraints. MedLayBench-V provides a verified foundation for training and evaluating next-generation Med-VLMs capable of bridging the communication divide between clinical experts and patients.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at capturing communicative intent, this capability introduces a side effect: Pragmatic Hallucination, where models over-interpret literal contexts to generate non-factual inferences. To quantify this, we introduce the PaCE (Pragmatics-as-Context Evaluation) benchmark, comprising over 3,000 manually verified "context-flip" samples. Evaluations across nine mainstream models reveal a significant Context Sensitivity Gap (CSG), with literal accuracy consistently lagging behind pragmatic reasoning. Attribution analysis indicates that Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) exacerbates this bias, and neither parameter scaling nor Chain-of-Thought (CoT) fully mitigates it. Crucially, "Strict Prompting" effectively reverses the CSG, demonstrating that the phenomenon stems from behavioral lock-in during training rather than inherent capability deficiencies. Furthermore, error patterns exhibit high systematic correlation across diverse architectures. This study highlights that current alignment paradigms lack precise control over pragmatic boundaries, underscoring the necessity for a "Literal Grounding" mechanism in future safety frameworks.

Abstract:
We propose DPLoRA (Dual-Pruning Low-Rank Adaptation), a framework that optimizes rank allocation via two stages: (1) an initial pruning stage (OPLoRA; Optimal Pruning LoRA) that uses Integer Linear Programming (ILP) to determine optimal layer-wise ranks without manual tuning; and (2) a progressive pruning stage that further reduces ranks adaptively during training using importance scores smoothed by Exponential Moving Average (EMA). Experiments demonstrate that OPLoRA consistently outperforms existing PEFT baselines on GLUE and instruction-following tasks, while the full DPLoRA framework establishes a new state-of-the-art among compared PEFT baselines on GLUE at high-performance settings ( p=0.4 ). At efficiency-focused settings ( p=0.8 ), our method reduces trainable parameters by over 80% and training time by 46% compared to standard LoRA, offering a highly efficient solution for deploying large-scale models in resource-constrained environments.

Abstract:
Answering complex real-world questions in the medical domain often requires accurate retrieval from medical Textual Knowledge Graphs (medical TKGs), as the relational path information from TKGs could enhance the inference ability of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the main bottlenecks lie in the scarcity of existing medical TKGs, the limited expressiveness of their topological structures, and the lack of comprehensive evaluations of current retrievers for medical TKGs. To address these challenges, we first develop a dataset for LLMs Complex R eason i ng over medical Te xtual K nowledge Graphs (RiTeK), covering a broad range of topological structures. Specifically, we synthesize realistic user queries integrating diverse topological structures, relational information, and complex textual descriptions. We conduct a rigorous medical expert evaluation process to assess and validate the quality of our synthesized queries. RiTeK also serves as a comprehensive benchmark dataset for evaluating the capabilities of retrieval systems built upon LLMs. By assessing 11 representative retrievers on this benchmark, we observe that existing methods struggle to perform well, revealing notable limitations in current LLM-driven retrieval approaches. These findings highlight the pressing need for more effective retrieval systems tailored for semi-structured data in the medical domain.

Abstract:
Zero-shot Dialog State Tracking (zs-DST) is essential for enabling Task-Oriented Dialog Systems (TODs) to generalize to new domains without costly data annotation. A central challenge lies in the semantic misalignment between dynamic dialog contexts and static prompts, leading to inflexible cross-layer coordination, domain interference, and catastrophic forgetting. To tackle this, we propose Hierarchical Collaborative Low-Rank Adaptation (HiCoLoRA), a framework that enhances zero-shot slot inference through robust prompt alignment. It features a hierarchical LoRA architecture for dynamic layer-specific processing (combining lower-layer heuristic grouping and higher-layer full interaction), integrates Spectral Joint Domain-Slot Clustering to identify transferable associations (feeding an Adaptive Linear Fusion Mechanism), and employs Semantic-Enhanced SVD Initialization (SemSVD-Init) to preserve pre-trained knowledge. Experiments on multi-domain datasets MultiWOZ and SGD show that HiCoLoRA outperforms baselines, achieving SOTA in zs-DST.

Abstract:
Authorship verification (AV) is the task of determining whether two texts were written by the same author and has been studied extensively, predominantly for English data. In contrast, large-scale benchmarks and systematic evaluations for other languages remain scarce. We address this gap by introducing GerAV, a comprehensive benchmark for German AV comprising over 400k labeled text pairs. GerAV is built from Twitter and Reddit data, with the Reddit part further divided into in-domain and cross-domain message-based subsets, as well as a profile-based subset. This design enables controlled analysis of the effects of data source, topical domain, and text length. Using the provided training splits, we conduct a systematic evaluation of strong baselines and state-of-the-art models and find that our best approach, a fine-tuned large language model, outperforms recent baselines by up to 0.09 absolute F1 score and surpasses GPT-5 in a zero-shot setting by 0.08. We further observe a trade-off between specialization and generalization: models trained on specific data types perform best under matching conditions but generalize less well across data regimes, a limitation that can be mitigated by combining training sources. Overall, GerAV provides a challenging and versatile benchmark for advancing research on German and cross-domain AV.

Abstract:
Recently, large language models (LLMs) are capable of generating highly fluent textual content. While they offer significant convenience to humans, they also introduce various risks, like phishing and academic dishonesty. Numerous research efforts have been dedicated to developing algorithms for detecting AI-generated text and constructing relevant datasets. However, in the domain of Chinese corpora, challenges remain, including limited model diversity and data homogeneity. To address these issues, we propose C-ReD: a comprehensive Chinese Real-prompt AI-generated text Detection benchmark. Experiments demonstrate that C-ReD not only enables reliable in-domain detection but also supports strong generalization to unseen LLMs and external Chinese datasets—addressing critical gaps in model diversity, domain coverage, and prompt realism that have limited prior Chinese detection benchmarks. We release our resources at https://github.com/HeraldofLight/C-ReD.

Abstract:
Visual Question Answering (VQA) requires models to identify the correct answer options based on both visual and textual evidence. Recent Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) methods improve option reasoning by grouping similar concepts or routing based on examples. However, unstable routing can lead to inconsistent expert selection in the same question type, while overly stable routing may reduce flexibility. To address this, we propose Concept-Guided Routing framework (CoGR-MoE), which incorporates semantics of the answer options to guide expert selection in the training phase.Next, option features are used to reweight the selected experts, producing discriminative representations for each candidate option. These option-level representations are further used for option comparison and optimized via contrastive learning. The experimental results indicate that CoGR-MoE delivers strong performance across multiple VQA tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.

Abstract:
Firearm violence is a pressing public health issue, yet research into survivors’ lived experiences remains underfunded and difficult to scale. Qualitative research, including in-depth interviews, is a valuable tool for understanding the personal and societal consequences of community firearm violence and designing effective interventions. However, manually analyzing these narratives through thematic analysis and inductive coding is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have opened the door to automating this process, though concerns remain about whether these models can accurately and ethically capture the experiences of vulnerable populations. In this study, we assess the use of open-source LLMs to inductively code interviews with 21 Black men who have survived community firearm violence. Our results demonstrate that while some configurations of LLMs can identify important codes, overall relevance remains low and is highly sensitive to data processing. Furthermore, LLM guardrails lead to substantial narrative erasure. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of LLM-assisted qualitative coding and underscore the ethical challenges of applying AI in research involving marginalized communities.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) and Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF) often fail to benefit from test-time compute due to entropy collapse and the resulting loss of reasoning diversity. We show that this collapse is driven not by uniform entropy decay, but by premature overconfidence at a small number of structurally critical decision points. Based on a token-level analysis of GRPO-style policy optimization, we propose SCOPE (Structural Collapse-aware Optimization via Partial Entropy control), which assigns each generated token a redistribution score and applies selective KL regularization to only the top ∼ 5 % of tokens under this score. Across model scales and architectures on math reasoning benchmarks, SCOPE consistently improves performance under both RLVR and RLIF settings, demonstrating that targeted entropy control at a vanishingly small subset of tokens is sufficient to sustain reasoning diversity and effective test-time scaling.

Abstract:
Aspect Sentiment Quad Prediction (ASQP) is a fundamental yet challenging task in fine-grained sentiment analysis, particularly when aspects or opinions are implicit. Existing methods often lack explainability and generalization, making it difficult to justify inference decisions and to detect implicit sentiment across domains and varied expression patterns. To address these limitations, we propose Tree-CoT-RT, an explainable multi-path tree-guided chain-of-thought and reinforcement learning framework specifically designed for ASQP. The core idea is to use sentiment tree structures to design type-specific reasoning templates that guide LLMs in generating explainable chains, including both final sentiment quadruples and intermediate inference steps for transparent implicit reasoning. However, the generated reasoning chains often vary in quality and may contain logical inconsistencies. To mitigate this, we introduce a reinforcement learning strategy with a rule-based reward function to generate high-quality reasoning traces, which are then used to fine-tune the LLM and enable controlled sampling. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that Tree-CoT-RT substantially outperforms strong baselines, particularly in scenarios involving implicit sentiment analysis.

Abstract:
We present NeoAraBERT, a state-of-the-art open-source Arabic text-embedding model built on the NeoBERT architecture. We pre-train NeoAraBERT on diverse open-source and internal datasets covering modern standard, classical, and dialectal Arabic. We guided our design choices with Arabic tailored ablation studies including text normalization, light stemming, and diacritics-aware tokenization handling. We also performed more general POS-aware token masking and learning-rate scheduling ablation studies. We benchmarked NeoAraBERT against five top-performing Arabic models on 23 tasks, including a novel synonym-based task, "Muradif", that directly assesses embedding quality with no additional fine-tuning. NeoAraBERT variants (MSA, dialectal, and mixed) rank first in 18 tasks, second in two, third in two, and fourth in one task. They show strong performance on classical and modern standard Arabic, substantial margins of improvement ( > 7%) in two tasks, and a + 2.75% improvement on average across all tasks. Our code and links to checkpoints for our model variants are available on our website: https://acr.ps/neoarabert .

Abstract:
Medical visual question answering (MedVQA) requires models to provide accurate answers given a medical image and a corresponding question. Recently, instruction tuning of general large vision–language models (LVLMs) has become a dominant paradigm for this task, enabling open-ended predictions and effective integration of multimodal information. However, existing methods synthesize instruction data from image–caption pairs that primarily focus on visual attributes, rather than knowledge-level QA generation. This situation limits the model’s ability to learn relevant medical knowledge during training, thereby restricting its performance on MedVQA. Hence, this paper proposes MedKInstruct, which incorporates a multimodal medical knowledge graph (MMKG) to assist LVLMs in synthesizing knowledge-intensive instruction data. Additionally, we design an MMKG path–based reward function to train a stronger MedVQA model through reinforcement learning. Experimental results on the public datasets Slake and VQA-RAD show that MedKInstruct outperforms previous methods by 4.16% and 4.50%. The source code is available at the following link: https://github.com/Sonder-hang/MedKinstruct

Abstract:
Speech processing for low-resource dialects remains a fundamental challenge in developing inclusive and robust speech technologies. Despite its linguistic significance and large speaker population, the Wu dialect of Chinese has long been hindered by the lack of large-scale speech data, standardized evaluation benchmarks, and publicly available models. In this work, we present WenetSpeech-Wu, the first large-scale, multi-dimensionally annotated open-source speech corpus for the Wu dialect, comprising approximately 8,000 hours of diverse speech data. Building upon this dataset, we introduce WenetSpeech-Wu-Bench, the first standardized and publicly accessible benchmark for systematic evaluation of Wu dialect speech processing, covering automatic speech recognition (ASR), Wu-to-Mandarin translation, speaker attribute prediction, speech emotion recognition, text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis, and instruction-following TTS (instruct TTS). Furthermore, we release a suite of strong open-source models trained on WenetSpeech-Wu, establishing competitive performance across multiple tasks and empirically validating the effectiveness of the proposed dataset. Together, these contributions lay the foundation for a comprehensive Wu dialect speech processing ecosystem, and we open-source proposed datasets, benchmarks, and models to support future research on dialectal speech intelligence.

Abstract:
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive linguistic fluency in low-resource languages, their capacity to process deep cultural nuances remains insufficiently quantified. This paper introduces MonCulture-Eval, a benchmark designed to assess the cultural intelligence of LLMs in the Mongolian context across two writing systems (Traditional and Cyrillic) and three regional sub-cultures (Alxa, Ordos, and Horqin). Curated entirely from primary, non-digitized archives to prevent data contamination, the benchmark employs a three-layer cognitive hierarchy—Factual, Situational, and Values—supplemented by specialized tasks including Riddles, Taboos, and Proverbs. Evaluation of frontier models reveals a severe "Script Gap" and a systematic "Etic Bias," where models sanitize spiritual rituals into secular functional norms.

Abstract:
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), especially Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), has emerged as a promising approach to fine-tuning large language models(LLMs) while reducing computational and memory overhead. However, LoRA assumes a uniform rank r for each incremental matrix, not accounting for the varying significance of weight matrices across different modules and layers. AdaLoRA leverages Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to parameterize updates and employs pruning of singular values to introduce dynamic rank allocation, thereby enhancing adaptability. However, during the training process, it often encounters issues of slow convergence speed and high computational overhead. To address this issue, we propose HyperAdaLoRA, a novel framework that accelerates the convergence of AdaLoRA by leveraging a hypernetwork. Instead of directly optimizing the components of Singular Value Decomposition (P, 𝛬, Q) , HyperAdaLoRA employs a hypernetwork based on attention mechanisms to dynamically generate these parameters. By pruning the outputs of the hypernetwork that generates the singular values, dynamic rank allocation is achieved. Comprehensive experiments on various datasets and models demonstrate that our method achieves faster convergence without sacrificing performance. Moreover, our method generalizes well to other LoRA-based approaches, highlighting its strong generalization capability.

Abstract:
The rapid advancement of Audio Large Language Models (ALMs), driven by Neural Audio Codecs (NACs), has led to the emergence of highly realistic speech deepfakes, commonly referred to as CodecFakes (CFs). Consequently, CF detection has attracted increasing attention from the research community. However, existing studies predominantly focus on English or Chinese, leaving the vulnerability of Indic languages largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce Indic-CodecFake (ICF) dataset, the first large-scale benchmark comprising real and NAC-synthesized speech across multiple Indic languages, diverse speaker profiles, and multiple NAC types. We use IndicSUPERB as the real speech corpus for generation of ICF dataset. Our experiments demonstrate that state-of-the-art (SOTA) CF detectors trained on English-centric datasets fail to generalize to ICF, underscoring the challenges posed by phonetic diversity and prosodic variability in Indic speech. Further, we present systematic evaluation of SOTA ALMs in a zero-shot setting on ICF dataset. We evaluate these ALMs as they have shown effectiveness for different speech tasks. However, our findings reveal that current ALMs exhibit consistently poor performance. To address this, we propose SATYAM, a novel hyperbolic ALM tailored for CF detection in Indic languages. SATYAM integrates semantic representations from Whisper and prosodic representations from TRILLsson using through Bhattacharya distance in hyperbolic space, and subsequently performs the same alignment procedure between the fused speech representation and a input conditioning prompt. This dual-stage fusion framework enables SATYAM to effectively model hierarchical relationships both within speech (semantic–prosodic) and across modalities (speech–text). Extensive evaluations show that SATYAM consistently outperforms competitive end-to-end and ALM-based baselines on the ICF benchmark.

Abstract:
Medical reasoning models remain constrained by parametric knowledge and are thus susceptible to forgetting and hallucinations. DeepResearch (DR) models ground outputs in verifiable evidence from tools and perform strongly in general domains, but their direct transfer to medical field yields relatively limited gains. We attribute this to two gaps: task characteristic and tool-use scaling. Medical questions require evidence interpretation in a knowledge-intensive clinical context; while general DR models can retrieve information, they often lack clinical-context reasoning and thus “find it but fail to use it,” leaving performance limited by medical abilities. Moreover, in medical scenarios, blindly scaling tool-call can inject noisy context, derailing sensitive medical reasoning and prompting repetitive evidence-seeking along incorrect paths. Therefore, we propose DeepMed. For data, we deploy a multi-hop med-search QA synthesis method supporting the model to apply the DR paradigm in medical contexts. For training, we introduce a difficulty-aware turn-penalty to suppress excessive tool-call growth. For inference, we bring a monitor to help validate hypotheses within a controlled number of steps and avoid context rot. Overall, on seven medical benchmarks, DeepMed improves its base model by 9.79% on average and outperforms larger medical reasoning and DR models.

Abstract:
Representation Fine-tuning (ReFT), a recently proposed parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PeFT) method, significantly improves parameter efficiency by modifying the representation space alone. However, directly applying ReFT, which alters a fixed number of representations at the beginning and end positions of each layer, results in suboptimal performance for two reasons. (i) The impact of these fixed-position representations on the output is uncertain; (ii) As the sequence length increases, fine-tuning a fixed number of representations may have diminishing effects on the final results. Based on our observations that punctuation plays a crucial role in integrating representations from preceding layers and modulating those of subsequent layers, we introduce Punctuation-steered Representation Fine-tuning (PuReFT), a straightforward yet powerful approach that additionally fine-tunes punctuation representations to achieve performance improvements. Extensive evaluations on common-sense, arithmetic, and code datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and versatility of PuReFT. Furthermore, our analysis of its training speed and memory overhead confirms its greater ease of use and efficiency.

Abstract:
Speech representations that capture prosodic information can be useful for both understanding and generation. However, speaker characteristics are reflected in acoustic-prosodic features (e.g., pitch). To address privacy concerns from the leakage of identity information, we propose a new self-supervised approach to learning prosody representations that incorporates speaker disentanglement strategies. We evaluate our encoder on three tasks to probe representation capabilities, including pitch reconstruction and detection of different prosodic events. Our encoder outperforms raw prosody and HuBERT-base baselines, achieving strong speaker disentanglement without adverse impact on prosody-related downstream tasks.

Abstract:
Agentic LLM inference with long contexts is increasingly limited by memory bandwidth rather than compute. In this setting, SwiGLU MLP blocks, whose large weights exceed cache capacity, become a major yet under-optimized bottleneck in the Transformer architecture. We propose DeepFusionKernel, a deeply fused kernel that cuts HBM traffic and boosts cache reuse, delivering up to 13.2% speedup on H100 and 9.7% on A100 over SGLang. Integrated with SGLang and paired with a kernel scheduler, DeepFusionKernel ensures consistent accelerations across generation lengths, while remaining adaptable to diverse models, inference configurations, and hardware platforms.

Abstract:
Prefix parsing asks whether an input prefix can be extended to a complete string generated by a given grammar. In the weighted setting, it also provides prefix probabilities, which are central to context-free language modeling, psycholinguistic analysis, and syntactically constrained generation from large language models. We introduce the prefix grammar transformation, an efficient reduction of prefix parsing to ordinary parsing. Given a grammar, our method constructs another grammar that generates exactly the prefixes of its original strings. Prefix parsing is then solved by applying any ordinary parsing algorithm on the transformed grammar without modification. The reduction is both elegant and practical: the transformed grammar is only a small factor larger than the input, and any optimized implementation can be used directly, eliminating the need for bespoke prefix-parsing algorithms. We also present a strategy—based on algorithmic differentiation—for computing the next-token weight vector, i.e., the prefix weights of all one-token extensions, enabling efficient prediction of the next token. Together, these contributions yield a simple, general, and efficient framework for prefix parsing.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) now give reasoning before answering, excelling in tasks like multiple-choice question answering (MCQA). Yet, a concern is that LLMs do not solve MCQs as intended, as work finds LLMs sans reasoning succeed in MCQA without using the question, i.e., choices-only. Such partial-input success is often deemed problematic, but reasoning traces could reveal if these strategies are truly shallow in choices-only settings. To study these strategies, reasoning LLMs solve MCQs in full and choices-only inputs; test-time reasoning often boosts accuracy on full and in choices-only half the time. While possibly due to shallow shortcuts, choices-only success is barely affected by the length of reasoning traces, and after finding traces pass faithfulness tests, we show they use less problematic strategies like inferring missing questions. In all, we challenge claims that partial-input success is always a flaw, so we discuss how reasoning traces could separate problematic data from less problematic reasoning.

Abstract:
Lowering the numerical precision of model parameters and computations is widely adopted to improve the efficiency of retrieval systems. However, when computing relevance scores between the query and documents in low-precision, we observe spurious ties due to the reduced granularity. This introduces high variability in the results based on tie resolution, making the evaluation less reliable. To address this, we propose a more robust retrieval evaluation protocol designed to reduce score variation. It consists of: (1) High-Precision Scoring (HPS), which upcasts the final scoring step to higher precision to resolve tied candidates with minimal computational cost; and (2) Tie-aware Retrieval Metrics (TRM), which report expected scores, range, and bias to quantify order uncertainty of tied candidates. Our experiments test multiple models with three scoring functions on twelve retrieval datasets to demonstrate that HPS dramatically reduces tie-induced instability, and TRM accurately recovers expected metric values. This combination enables a more consistent and reliable evaluation system for lower-precision retrieval.

Abstract:
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over long documents typically involves splitting the text into smaller chunks, which serve as the basic units for retrieval. However, due to dependencies across the original document, contextual information is often essential for accurately interpreting each chunk. To address this, prior work has explored encoding longer context windows to produce embeddings for longer chunks, yet their gains in retrieval and downstream tasks remain limited. This is because (1) longer chunks strain the capacity of embedding models due to the increased amount of information they must encode, and (2) many real-world applications still require returning localized evidence due to constraints on model or human bandwidth. To this end, we propose an alternative approach to this challenge by representing short chunks in a way that is conditioned on a broader context window to enhance retrieval performance – i.e., situating a chunk’s meaning within its context. We further show that existing embedding models are not well-equipped to encode such situated context effectively, and thus introduce a new training paradigm and develop the first situated embedding model. To evaluate our method, we curate a book-plot retrieval dataset specifically designed to assess situated retrieval capabilities. On this benchmark, our 1B-parameter model substantially outperforms state-of-the-art embedding models, including several with up to 7B parameters.

Abstract:
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves the factual accuracy of large language model (LLM) outputs by grounding generation in external knowledge. Recent agentic RAG systems extend this paradigm by introducing critic agents that evaluate model responses and iteratively refine outputs. However, most prior work implicitly assumes reliable critic feedback and focuses on planning strategies, while paying limited attention to the robustness of the error correction process itself, which is often hindered by misaligned error categories and ineffective or incorrect corrections. We hypothesize that RAG performance can be improved without explicit error categorization. To this end, we propose RePAIR, a response–action learning paradigm that directly maps flawed RAG outputs to error-mitigating action plans without relying on fine-grained error taxonomies or explicit critic supervision. Across multiple benchmarks, RePAIR consistently improves agentic RAG performance.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) trained on massive text corpora may inadvertently memorize sensitive or copyrighted content, motivating the need for more targeted unlearning. Selective LLM unlearning focuses on identifying token-level or span-level unlearning targets within a text, rather than treating entire sequences as unlearning targets. However, many existing selective approaches depend on external supervision to identify unlearning targets, which may misalign unlearning objectives with the model’s internal behavior. In this paper, we propose a selective span-level unlearning method that is grounded entirely in model-intrinsic information. Our method first estimates token-level importance scores by contrasting gradient information induced by forget and retain datasets, identifying tokens that disproportionately contribute to information targeted for unlearning. These token-level importance scores are then used as anchors to identify coherent span-level unlearning targets via a self-consistency–based generation process, allowing the model to determine stable spans based on its own predictions. Experiments on two LLM unlearning benchmarks show that our approach achieves comparable unlearning performance while substantially better preserving retained knowledge.

Abstract:
We study how visual artifacts introduced by diffusion-based inpainting affect language generation in vision-language models. We use a two-stage diagnostic setup in which masked image regions are reconstructed and then provided to captioning models, enabling controlled comparisons between captions generated from original and reconstructed inputs. Across multiple datasets, we analyze the relationship between reconstruction fidelity and downstream caption quality. We observe consistent associations between pixel-level and perceptual reconstruction metrics and both lexical and semantic captioning performance. Additional analysis of intermediate visual representations and attention patterns shows that inpainting artifacts lead to systematic, layer-dependent changes in model behavior. Together, these results provide a practical diagnostic framework for examining how visual reconstruction quality influences language generation in multimodal systems.

Abstract:
While self-consistency is known to improve performance on symbolic reasoning, its effect on the recall of encyclopedic knowledge is unclear due to a lack of targeted evaluation grounds.To address this, we establish such a knowledge recall split for the popular MMLU benchmark by applying a data-driven heuristic from prior work.We validate this split by showing that the performance patterns on the symbolic reasoning and knowledge recall subsets mirror those of GSM8K and MedMCQA, respectively.Using this solid ground, we find that self-consistency consistently improves performance across both symbolic reasoning and knowledge recall, even though its underlying CoT prompting is primarily effective for symbolic reasoning.As a result, we achieve an 89% accuracy on MMLU, the best performance to date with the use of GPT-4o.

Abstract:
One of biggest missing capabilities in state-of-the-art AI systems is the ability to learn continually after deployment. However, implementing an inference-time learning system has several challenges including the large memory requirement of gradient-based algorithms that are used to train state-of-the-art LLMs. Evolutionary Strategies (ES) have recently re-emerged as a gradient-free alternative to traditional learning algorithms and have shown encouraging performance on specific tasks in LLMs. In this paper, we perform a more comprehensive analysis of ES and specifically evaluate its forgetting curves when training for a larger number of update steps. We find that although ES is able to reach performance numbers closer to GRPO for math and reasoning tasks, it is accompanied by significant forgetting of prior abilities. We also show that the updates made using ES are much less sparse and have a larger l2 norm compared to corresponding GRPO updates, explaining the contrasting forgetting curves between the two algorithms. With this study, we aim to specifically highlight the issue of forgetting in gradient-free algorithms like ES and hope to inspire future work to mitigate these issues.

Abstract:
We present a multilingual coreference dataset of 827k tokens of fiction in 7 languages: Bahasa Indonesia, Chinese, Dutch, English, Italian, Korean, and Spanish. The dataset includes full stories of diverse lengths, ranging from 500 to 17k words. We discuss our annotation scheme focusing on characters and language-specific challenges we encountered. Finally we present evaluation results of a neural coreference system trained on our dataset. We show that jointly training a system across all languages provides a strong improvement over monolingually trained models. The dataset is available under a creative commons license in CoNLL-2012 and CorefUD format at https://github.com/GOLEM-lab/GOLEMcoref/

Abstract:
Recent works proposed test-time alignment methods that rely on a small aligned model as a proxy that guides the generation of a larger base (unaligned) model. The implicit reward approach skews the large model distribution, whereas the nudging approach defers the generation of the next token to the small aligned model when the large base one is unconfident about its outcome. In this work, we first show that both approaches can be reduced to sampling from similar graphical models, where they differ only in the definition of a rejection criterion (or distribution). Moreover, we argue that the confidence criterion is ill-motivated due to linguistic phenomena like ambiguous phrasing. We propose a novel rejection criterion based on a conservative confidence bet. Experimentally, our novel approach outperforms previous work on several datasets.

Abstract:
Group-based reinforcement learning methods, like Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), are widely used nowadays to post-train large language models. Despite their empirical success, they exhibit structural mismatches between reward optimization and the underlying training objective. In this paper, we present a theoretical analysis of GRPO style methods by studying them within a unified surrogate formulation. This perspective reveals recurring properties that affect all the methods under analysis: (i) non-uniform group weighting induces systematic gradient biases on shared prefix tokens; (ii) interactions with the AdamW optimizer make training dynamics largely insensitive to reward scaling; and (iii) optimizer momentum can push policy updates beyond the intended clipping region under repeated optimization steps. We believe that these findings highlight fundamental limitations of current approaches and provide principled guidance for the design of future formulations.

Abstract:
Anchoring bias causes large language models (LLMs) to shift quantitative judgments in response to irrelevant numerical primes. We analyze this bias as a function of model confidence and accuracy in base, instruction-tuned, and distilled variants of Llama and Qwen models. We find that anchoring susceptibility is negatively correlated with model confidence without regard to accuracy: confidently incorrect models resist anchoring as effectively as accurate ones, provided their internal priors are sufficiently strong. We further show that post-training impacts the strength of this relationship, and that models are more susceptible to high anchors than to low anchors. Our findings suggest anchoring resistance is a structural property of distributional concentration (certainty) rather than knowledge correctness (factual accuracy), with implications for deploying LLMs in numerical reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Recent work has shown that fine-tuning on insecure code data can trigger an emergent misalignment (EMA) phenomenon, where models generate malicious responses even to prompts unrelated to the original insecure code-writing task. Such cross-domain generalization of harmful behavior underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the algorithms, tasks, and datasets that induce emergent misalignment. In this work, we extend this study by demonstrating that emergent misalignment can also arise from narrow refusal unlearning in specific domains. We perform refusal unlearning on Cybersecurity and Safety concept, and evaluate EMA by monitoring refusal scores across seven responsible AI (RAI) domains, Cybersecurity, Safety, Toxicity, Bias, Sensitive Content, Medical/Legal, and Privacy. Our work shows that narrow domain unlearning can yield compliance responses for the targeted concept, however, it may also propagate EMA to unrelated domains. Among the two intervened concepts, Cybersecurity and Safety, we find that the safety concept can have larger EMA impact, i.e, causing lower refusal scores, across other unrelated domains such as bias. We observe this effect consistently across two model families, Mistral-7b-0.3v, and Qwen-7b-2.5. Further, we show that refusal unlearning augmented with cross-entropy loss function on a small set of retain data from the affected domains can largely, if not fully, restore alignment across the impacted domains while having lower refusal rate on the concept we perform unlearning on. To investigate the underlying causes of EMA, we analyze concept entanglements at the representation level via concept vectors. Our analysis reveals that concepts with higher representation similarity in earlier layers are more susceptible to EMA after intervention when the refusal stream is altered through targeted refusal unlearning.

Abstract:
Events exhibit rich semantic relations that are essential for understanding the unfolding of real-world processes. Although large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance on event relation extraction, how event relations are internally represented and utilized remains unclear. In this paper, we present UERLens, an interpretability framework for understanding event relations in LLMs. Specifically, we first construct UERBench, a counterfactual dataset for event relation analysis that covers causal, temporal, and sub-event relations. Based on counterfactual pairs, we identify relation-sensitive internal features by comparing model activations. We then examine the functional role of these features through model manipulation, including model intervention and model training. Experimental results show that event relations are encoded through structured and layer-specific internal features. Disabling relation-sensitive features leads to performance drops of over 22%, while enhancing them yields improvements of up to 7%. Furthermore, leveraging these interpretable features to train a lightweight classifier significantly improves event relation extraction, achieving F1 gains of up to 24% for causal relations.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) sometimes exhibit language confusion when generating non-English text. Existing approaches typically rely on fine-tuning to mitigate this issue. In contrast, we propose a tuning-free paradigm for reducing language confusion. Within this paradigm, we introduce two methods: Language-Aware Token Boosting (LATB), which applies targeted perturbations to tokens associated with the desired language, and Adaptive Language-Aware Token Boosting (Adaptive-LATB), which dynamically adjusts these perturbations based on the model’s confidence in the intended language. Experiments demonstrate that our methods effectively improve multilingual alignment by reducing language confusion, while maintain the summarization quality without requiring any additional fine-tuning. Our code is publicly available.[].

Abstract:
GraphRAG augments large language models with structured knowledge graphs, enabling graph-based context selection and a more integrated view of the knowledge space. However, recent work shows that GraphRAG exposes a new attack surface: corpus-level knowledge poisoning can inject spurious entities and relationships during graph construction, corrupting query-specific subgraphs and steering the generator toward incorrect answers. We propose Hop-wise Guard for GraphRAG (HoG-GRAG), a defense layer between retriever and generator that decomposes multi-hop questions into ordered subqueries, monitors hop-wise execution for poisoning-induced inconsistencies, and locally repairs the retrieved subgraph by pruning compromised entities and relationships and adding only minimal missing evidence. Experiments on multi-hop datasets and multiple GraphRAG configurations show that HoG-GRAG recovers a large fraction of the lost performance. The code is available at https://github.com/CyberScienceLab/HoG-GRAG.

Abstract:
Large reasoning models such as DeepSeek-R1 and their distilled variants achieve strong performance on complex reasoning tasks. Yet, distilling these models often demands large-scale data for supervised fine-tuning (SFT), motivating the pursuit of data-efficient training methods. To address this, we propose a skill-centric distillation framework that efficiently transfers reasoning ability to weaker models with two components: (1) Skill-based data selection, which prioritizes examples targeting the student model’s weaker skills, and (2) Skill-aware fine-tuning, which encourages explicit skill decomposition during problem solving. With only 1,000 training examples selected from a 100K teacher-generated corpus, our method surpasses random SFT baselines by +1.6% on Qwen3-4B and +1.4% on Qwen3-8B across five mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Further analysis confirms that these gains concentrate on skills emphasized during training, highlighting the effectiveness of skill-centric training for efficient reasoning distillation.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) are fluent but often brittle when interpretation depends on external information (e.g., events or participant roles), as next-token prediction does not explicitly encode situation-level semantic constraints. FrameNet provides a structured account of semantics through its inventory of frames, roles, and relations. We present a scalable framework that injects frame-semantic knowledge into LLMs via LoRA, moving from fact-oriented prompting to principle-oriented supervision over the full FrameNet inventory. The supervision encodes semantic constraints through semantic types, sense-aware definitions, frame relations, and role-annotated examples. To test whether this knowledge generalizes beyond surface cues, we use Natural Language Inference (NLI) as a diagnostic task for event-level reasoning. Experiments on CONFER and SNLI show consistent gains over Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct in zero-shot and few-shot settings, especially for entailment and contradiction. Complementary semantic role labeling analyses further indicate improved sensitivity to frame, role, and span structure.

Abstract:
Aligning text-to-speech (TTS) system outputs with human feedback through preference optimization has been shown to effectively improve the robustness and naturalness of LLM-based TTS models. Current approaches primarily require paired desirable and undesirable samples at the utterance level. However, such pairs are often limited in TTS output data, and utterance-level formulation prevents fine-grained token-level optimization needed for accurate pronunciation alignment. In this study, we propose TKTO that eliminates the need for paired data, enabling a more data-efficient training paradigm, and directly targets token-level units, automatically providing fine-grained alignment signals without token-level annotations. TKTO improves the challenging Japanese TTS accuracy by 39% and reduces CER by 54%, leveraging 6× more training data and assigning 12.8× stronger reward to targeted tokens.

Abstract:
Large language models (LLMs) encode problem difficulty as an internal signal that can be linearly decoded from their residuals. Given their multilingual capabilities, we investigate whether this meta-cognitive signal is language-agnostic and how it is organized across the model’s layers by training linear probes on the AMC subset of the Easy2Hard benchmark, translated into 21 languages. We found that difficulty-related signals emerge at two distinct stages of the model internals, corresponding to shallow (early-layers) and deep (later-layers) internal representations, that exhibit functionally different behaviors. Probes trained on deep representations achieve high accuracy when evaluated on the same language but exhibit weaker cross-lingual transfer. In contrast, probes trained on shallow representations generalize better across languages, despite achieving lower within-language performance. This closely aligns with existing findings in LLM interpretability, showing that models tend to operate in an abstract conceptual space before producing language-specific outputs. Our results suggest that this two-stage organizational principle extends beyond simple semantic processing to meta-cognitive properties such as problem difficulty, highlighting an internal control signal that is not tied to surface meaning.

Abstract:
The world is in the grip of ecological, meaning, and language crises that are converging into a metacrisis. Big AI is accelerating them all. LLM engineering sits at the core. Despite the public good motives of language engineers and the promise of LLMs, this work is being leveraged to create unprecedented wealth and power for a handful of individuals and corporations while causing existential harm to life on earth. As a profession, we urgently need to come together to explore alternatives and to design a life-affirming future for our field of natural language processing that is centered on human flourishing on a living planet.

Abstract:
Reinforcement Learning (RL) enhances LLM reasoning, yet a paradox emerges as models scale: strong base models saturate standard benchmarks (e.g., MATH), yielding correct but homogeneous solutions. In such environments, the lack of failure cases causes the advantage signal in group-relative algorithms (e.g., GRPO) to vanish, driving policies into mode collapse. To address this, we propose Constrained Uniform Top-K Sampling (CUTS), a parameter-free decoding strategy enforcing structure-preserving exploration. Unlike standard sampling that follows model biases, CUTS flattens the local optimization landscape by sampling uniformly from constrained high-confidence candidates. We integrate this into Mixed-CUTS, a training framework synergizing exploitative and exploratory rollouts to amplify intra-group advantage variance. Experiments on Qwen3 models demonstrate that our approach prevents policy degeneration and significantly boosts out-of-domain generalization. Notably, Mixed-CUTS improves Pass@1 accuracy on the challenging AIME25 benchmark by up to 15.1% over standard GRPO, validating that maintaining diversity within the semantic manifold is critical for rigorous reasoning.

Abstract:
Automated 3D radiology report generation often suffers from clinical hallucinations and a lack of the iterative verification found in human practice. While recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced the field, they typically operate as monolithic "black-box" systems without the collaborative oversight characteristic of clinical workflows. To address these challenges, we propose MARCH (Multi-Agent Radiology Clinical Hierarchy), a multi-agent framework that emulates the professional hierarchy of radiology departments and assigns specialized roles to distinct agents. MARCH utilizes a Resident Agent for initial drafting with multi-scale CT feature extraction, multiple Fellow Agents for retrieval-augmented revision, and an Attending Agent that orchestrates an iterative, stance-based consensus discourse to resolve diagnostic discrepancies. On the RadGenome-ChestCT dataset, MARCH significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both clinical fidelity and linguistic accuracy. Our work demonstrates that modeling human-like organizational structures enhances the reliability of AI in high-stakes medical domains.

Abstract:
Data mixing strategy is essential for large language model (LLM) training. Empirical evidence shows that inappropriate strategies can significantly reduce generalization. Although recent methods have improved empirical performance, several fundamental questions remain open: what constitutes a domain, whether human and model perceptions of domains are aligned, and how domain weighting influences generalization. We address these questions by establishing formal connections between gradient dynamics and domain distributions, offering a theoretical framework that clarifies the role of domains in training dynamics. Building on this analysis, we introduce DoGraph, a reweighting framework that formulates data scheduling as a graph-constrained optimization problem. Extensive experiments on GPT-2 models of varying scales demonstrate that DoGraph consistently achieves competitive performance.

Abstract:
As the use of digital devices and social media grows among younger users, cybergrooming has emerged as a critical social concern for protecting vulnerable minors online. However, research on automated cybergrooming detection remains limited due to data scarcity. Building on previous studies that conceptualize cybergrooming as a form of luring communication, this paper investigates the potential transferability of corpora from luring or manipulative contexts for cybergrooming detection.

Abstract:
Test-time alignment methods offer a promising alternative to fine-tuning by steering the outputs of large language models (LLMs) at inference time with lightweight interventions on their internal representations. Recently, a prominent and effective approach, RE-Control (Kong et al., 2024), has proposed leveraging an external value function trained over the LLM’s hidden states to guide generation via gradient-based editing. While effective, this method overlooks a key characteristic of alignment tasks, i.e. that they are typically formulated as learning from human preferences between candidate responses. To address this, in this paper we propose a novel preference-based training framework, Pref-CTRL, that uses a multi-objective value function to better reflect the structure of preference data. Our approach has outperformed RE-Control on two benchmark datasets and showed greater generalization on out-of-domain datasets. Our source code is available at https://github.com/UTS-nlPUG/pref-ctrl.

Abstract:
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a promising approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, it struggles to effectively balance the trade-off between exploration and exploitation during training, often resulting in suboptimal performance. Motivated by the theoretical insight that changes in entropy are governed by the covariance between token probabilities and their corresponding advantages, we propose a hyperparameter-free, covariance-weighted optimization method that dynamically down-weights extreme token-level updates via a Gaussian kernel. This approach automatically reduces the instability caused by the exploration-exploitation trade-off while preserving informative learning signals. Extensive empirical evaluations show that our approach improves downstream performance across reasoning benchmarks compared with GRPO, and effectively stabilizes entropy as training progresses.

Abstract:
Scientific feasibility assessment asks whether a claim is consistent with established knowledge and whether experimental evidence could support or refute it. We frame feasibility assessment as a diagnostic reasoning task in which, given a hypothesis, a model predicts feasible or infeasible and justifies its decision. We evaluate large language models (LLMs) under controlled knowledge conditions (hypothesis-only, with experiments, with outcomes, or both) and probe robustness by progressively removing portions of the experimental and/or outcome context. Across multiple LLMs and two datasets, providing outcome evidence is generally more reliable than providing experiment descriptions. Outcomes tend to improve accuracy beyond what internal knowledge alone provides, whereas experimental text can be brittle and may degrade performance when the context is incomplete. These findings clarify when experimental evidence benefits LLM-based feasibility assessment and when it introduces fragility.

Abstract:
While having a significant potential for parallel processing in theory, diffusion-based non-autoregressive text generation remains inefficient due to the need for multiple denoising steps. Performance degrades sharply if a low number of steps is used, such as in flow matching. To enable accurate one-step generation, we propose a novel shortcut flow-matching model that learns to directly predict multi-step denoising outcomes in a single step. Experiments conducted on three datasets demonstrate consistent improvements over classic flow-matching, with BLEU scores more than doubling on two datasets. We also tested five different ways of extending shortcut models with commonly used techniques.

Abstract:
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) followed by Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as the standard post-training paradigm for large language models (LLMs). However, the conventional SFT process, driven by Cross-Entropy (CE) loss, often induces mode collapse, where models over-concentrate on specific response patterns. This lack of distributional diversity severely restricts the exploration efficiency required for subsequent RL. While recent studies have attempted to improve SFT by replacing CE loss, aiming to preserve diversity or refine the update policy, they fail to adequately balance diversity and accuracy, thereby achieving sub-optimal performance after RL. To address the mode collapse problem, we propose SED-SFT, which adaptively encourages diversity based on the token exploration space. This framework introduces a selective entropy regularization term with a selective masking mechanism into the optimization objective. Extensive experiments across eight mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that SED-SFT significantly enhances generation diversity with a negligible computational overhead increase compared with CE loss, yielding average improvements of 2.06 and 1.20 points in subsequent RL performance over standard CE-based baselines on Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-Math-7B-Instruct, respectively.

Abstract:
Commonsense reasoning often involves evaluating multiple plausible interpretations rather than selecting a single atomic answer, yet most benchmarks rely on single-label evaluation, obscuring whether statements are jointly plausible, mutually exclusive, or jointly implausible. We introduce LOGICAL-COMMONSENSEQA, a benchmark that reframes commonsense reasoning as logical composition over pairs of atomic statements using plausibility-level operators (AND, OR and NEITHER/NOR). Evaluating instruction-tuned, reasoning-specialized, and fine-tuned models under zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting, we find that while models perform reasonably on conjunctive and moderately on disjunctive reasoning, performance degrades sharply on negation-based questions. LOGICAL-COMMONSENSEQA exposes fundamental reasoning limitations and provides a controlled framework for advancing compositional commonsense reasoning.

Abstract:
Generative listwise reranking leverages global context for superior retrieval but is plagued by intrinsic position bias, where models exhibit structural sensitivity to input order independent of relevance. Existing mitigations present a dilemma: inference-time aggregation incurs prohibitive latency, while training-based methods often fail to eradicate ingrained priors, particularly in compact models. To resolve this dilemma, we propose CapCal (Content-Agnostic Probability Calibration), a training-free framework that mechanically decouples positional bias from ranking decisions. By estimating the bias distribution via content-free placeholders, CapCal rectifies output logits through an entropy-adaptive contrastive mechanism. Evaluations across 10 benchmarks confirm that CapCal achieves superior performance among training-free methods while preserving single-pass efficiency. Notably, it unlocks the latent potential of lightweight models (e.g., 0.6B), delivering absolute NDCG gains exceeding 10 points and outperforming computationally expensive data augmentation strategies.

Abstract:
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) for downstream tasks remains expensive, even with parameter-efficient methods like Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). In this regard, meta-learning approaches such as Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for LLMs (MAML-en-LLM) and Amortized Bayesian Meta-Learning for LoRA (ABMLL) have emerged as promising solutions for rapid downstream LLM adaptation. However, these methods fundamentally couple two distinct objectives: learning generalizable initializations and enabling efficient task adaptation. We argue that this coupling limits both the quality of learned representations and adaptation efficiency. In this paper, we introduce DeGAML-LLM (Decoupled Generalization and Adaptation in Meta-Learning for LLMs), a novel framework that explicitly separates these two objectives through dedicated parameter spaces. Specifically, we maintain a generalization module that learns task-agnostic representations across the task distribution, and an adaptation module that specializes in rapid task-specific adjustment. Extensive experiments on common-sense reasoning, mathematics, logic, social, medical and coding benchmarks across model scales demonstrate that DeGAML-LLM outperforms existing meta-learning and standard multi-task baselines.

Abstract:
Multimodal Reasoning Models (MRMs) leveraging Chain-of-Though (CoT) based thinking have revolutionized mathematical and logical problem-solving. However, we show that this paradigm struggles with generalized spatial intelligence. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of sixteen models across thirteen spatial benchmarks and identify a critical gap: CoT prompting consistently degrades performance in visual spatial reasoning. Furthermore, through a novel No-Image++ ablation, we demonstrate that MRMs and CoT prompted MLMs suffer from severe shortcut learning, and hallucinate visual details from textual priors even when the image is absent. These findings challenge the efficacy of text-only CoT for spatial tasks and underscore the need for vision-centric reasoning paradigms.

Abstract:
Diffusion models have introduced a generative paradigm for Named Entity Recognition (NER), formulating the task as refining entityspans from noise. While promising, our analysis on the ACE2004 dataset reveals a limitation when training with Exponential MovingAverage (EMA): the model performance often peaks at a single inference step (γ = 1) and plateaus or degrades with additional steps. Thissuggests that under standard stable training configurations, the model may function primarily as a one-step generator rather thanleveraging the iterative refinement capability characteristic of diffusion models. To address this, we propose an Initializer-Restorerapproach. Instead of initializing the reverse process from random Gaussian noise, we utilize a preliminary set of candidate spansgenerated by a standard NER model (e.g., BERT or GLiNER). This allows the diffusion model to start from an informed, diverse prior,enabling effective iterative restoration. We investigate different training strategies for the restorer and find that a hybrid strategy mixingground truth and noisy predictions is essential. Experiments on ACE2004, GENIA, and CleanCoNLL show that our approach improvesperformance over the baseline, particularly when multiple restoration steps are employed. For instance, on CleanCoNLL, our methodachieves an F1 score of 94.70%, compared to 93.79% for the baseline. Our code is available at https://github.com/longtrieu-ai/Initializer-Restorer-NER.

Abstract:
Current research on Event Factuality Prediction (EFP) predominantly treats LLMs as passive classifiers, where high aggregate metrics often mask shortcut learning and unreliable reasoning. In this position paper, we argue for a focus shift from event factuality to meta-factivity. We introduce the Meta-Factivity Framework (MFF), a theoretical roadmap that moves evaluation beyond surface recognition to belief trajectory reasoning and epistemic regulation. By framing hallucination as a failure of meta-cognitive control, we advocate for a transition from measuring black-box accuracy to evaluating white-box cognition, laying the groundwork for a more rigorous benchmark for explainable self-governance.

Abstract:
3D visual grounding (3DVG) aims to localize objects in a 3D scene based on natural language queries. In this work, we explore zero-shot 3DVG from multi-view images alone, without requiring any geometric supervision or object priors. We introduce Z3D, a universal grounding pipeline that flexibly operates on multi-view images while optionally incorporating camera poses and depth maps. We identify key bottlenecks in prior zero-shot methods causing significant performance degradation and address them with (i) a state-of-the-art zero-shot 3D instance segmentation method to generate high-quality 3D bounding box proposals and (ii) advanced reasoning via prompt-based segmentation, which utilizes full capabilities of modern VLMs. Extensive experiments on the ScanRefer and Nr3D benchmarks demonstrate that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance among zero-shot methods.

Abstract:
Recent large language models (LLMs) perform strongly on mathematical benchmarks yet often misapply lemmas, importing conclusions without validating assumptions. We formalize lemma-judging as a structured prediction task: given a statement and a candidate lemma, the model must output a precondition check and a conclusion-utility check, from which a usefulness decision is derived. We present RULES, which encodes this specification via a two-section output and trains with reinforcement learning plus section-aware loss masking to assign penalty to the section responsible for errors. Training and evaluation draw on diverse natural-language and formal proof corpora; robustness is assessed with a held-out perturbation suite; and end-to-end evaluation spans competition-style, perturbation-aligned, and theorem-based problems across various LLMs. Results show consistent in-domain gains over both a vanilla model and a single-label RL baseline, larger improvements on applicability-breaking perturbations, and parity or modest gains on end-to-end tasks; ablations indicate that the two-section outputs and section-aware reinforcement are both necessary for robustness.

Abstract:
As human-agent interaction (HAI) evolves toward long-term social companionship, users expect Original Character (OC) agents to maintain a consistent persona, manage shared memories, and adapt to ever-changing preferences. However, LLM-based agents optimized by prompting or SFT exhibit a generalization gap: they behave as myopic instruction followers, leading to cascading errors in multi-turn interactions. For the agents to learn trajectory-level value functions that enable farsighted decision-making, we propose the NSARL framework, which formalizes OC companion agents’ interactions as a POMDP and decomposes the agent into three sub-policies (Router, Memory, and Persona), optimized via closed-loop RL from AI feedback (RLAIF) with verifiable rewards in a graph-constrained action space. Our preliminary experiments indicate a trade-off: SFT yields stronger persona generation, while NSARL improves structural logic, through conservative strategies (e.g., over-routing) that increase workflow completeness, advocating for a hybrid deployment strategy.

Abstract:
LLM-based agents for text-to-SQL often struggle with latency-performance trade-off, where performance improvements come at the cost of latency or vice versa. We reformulate text-to-SQL generation within the lens of software test coverage where the original query is prepared with a suite of test cases with simpler, atomic SQLs that are executed in parallel and together ensure semantic coverage of the original query. After iterating on test case coverage, the final SQL is generated only when enough information is gathered, leveraging the explored test case SQLs to ground the final generation. We validated our framework on a state-of-the-art benchmark for text-to-SQL, Spider 2.0, achieving a new state-of-the-art with 70.2% execution accuracy.

Abstract:
In this paper, we find that the generated preceding tokens, which are not directly related to the answer, may still significantly push the large language model (LLM) towards the target answer. More crucially, the biased connotations of target answer in the preceding tokens can also transfer to other prompts. This finding suggests that the LLM may intentionally use the semantically unrelated tokens to help the generation of the target answer. Our finding offers a new perspective on understanding the long-range dependency phenomena in LLMs.

Abstract:
This paper introduces Late Code Chunking (LC 2 ), a chunking strategy designed to improve the semantic understanding of code segments for Large Language Models (LLMs). Repository-level code completion requires predicting the completion of unfinished code by leveraging cross-file context spread across a repository. However, when retrieved fragments have missing semantics—the loss of structural or behavioral information during chunking—LLMs struggle to interpret the target code. To address this, LC 2 refines retrieved chunks by constructing a dual context: a "Code Retrieval Context" optimized for similarity-based search, and a "Code Comprehension Context" that serves as a late enrichment step through context expansion and augmentation. This dual-context design reduces information loss due to chunking and enhances the ability of LLMs to utilize retrieved code. Additionally, we introduce an Asymmetric Query-Chunk Sizing strategy to further optimize retrieval quality by minimizing query noise. Our experiments demonstrate that LC 2 provides robust performance gains, achieving a statistically significant 19.7% improvement in Exact Match accuracy on the CrossCodeEval benchmark compared to the best existing chunking method.

Abstract:
Unsupervised representation learning using masked language modeling on the language of life has transformed protein research, enabling the analysis of a protein universe that is expanding at an exponential pace. However, most current models rely solely on sequence data, overlooking decades of expert-curated biological knowledge stored in natural language. While recent multimodal and knowledge-graph-based approaches attempt to bridge this gap, they often rely on shallow functional labels that lack the contextual depth of full textual narratives. We present Protein-STORY, a general pipeline that synthesizes protein embeddings from diverse, multi-source text descriptions. At the core of our approach is a novel network architecture designed for the semantic compression of multi document embeddings, which integrates high-fidelity functional and structural insights into a unified representation. Our experiments demonstrate that Protein-STORY produces biologically meaningful embeddings ( r ≈ 0.75 ) that outperform existing models on diverse downstream tasks (+2 pts F1 in function prediction). Furthermore, by projecting the story of a protein into a natural language semantic space, our model enables effective zero-shot text-prompted protein search.

Abstract:
Commonsense reasoning often requires both textual and visual knowledge, yet Large Language Models (LLMs) trained solely on text lack visual grounding (e.g., "what color is an emperor penguin’s belly?"). Visual Language Models (VLMs) perform better on visually grounded tasks but face two limitations: (i) often reduced performance on text-only commonsense reasoning compared to text-trained LLMs, and (ii) adapting newly released LLMs to vision input typically requires costly multimodal training. An alternative augments LLMs with test-time visual signals, improving visual commonsense without harming textual reasoning, but prior designs often rely on early fusion and a single image, which can be suboptimal. We propose a late multi-image fusion method: multiple images are generated from the text prompt with a lightweight parallel sampling, and their prediction probabilities are combined with those of a text-only LLM through a late-fusion layer that integrates projected visual features just before the final prediction. Across visual commonsense and NLP benchmarks, our method significantly outperforms augmented LLMs on visual reasoning, matches VLMs on vision-based tasks, and, when applied to strong LLMs such as LLaMA 3, also improves NLP performance while adding only modest test-time overhead.

Abstract:
Transformers often display an attention sink: probability mass concentrates on a fixed, content-agnostic position. Are sinks a byproduct of the optimization/training regime? Or are they sometimes functionally necessary in softmax Transformers? We prove that, in some settings, it is the latter: computing a simple trigger-conditional behavior necessarily induces a sink in softmax self-attention models. Our results formalize a familiar intuition: normalization over a probability simplex must force attention to collapse onto a stable anchor to realize a default state (e.g., when the model needs to ignore the input). We instantiate this with a concrete task: when a designated trigger token appears, the model must return the average of all preceding token representations, and otherwise output zero, a task which mirrors the functionality of attention heads in the wild (Barbero et al., 2025; Guo et al., 2024). We also prove that non-normalized ReLU attention can solve the same task without any sink, confirming that the normalization constraint is the fundamental driver of sink behavior. Experiments validate our predictions and demonstrate they extend beyond the theoretically analyzed setting: softmax models develop strong sinks while ReLU attention eliminates them in both single-head and multi-head variants.

Abstract:
Long-term conversational agents need memory systems that capture relationships between events, not merely isolated facts, to support temporal reasoning and multi-hop question answering. Current approaches face a fundamental trade-off: flat memory is efficient but fails to model relational structure, while graph-based memory enables structured reasoning at the cost of expensive and fragile construction. To address these issues, we propose StructMem, a structure-enriched hierarchical memory framework that preserves event-level bindings and induces cross-event connections. By temporally anchoring dual perspectives and performing periodic semantic consolidation, StructMem improves temporal reasoning and multi-hop performance on LoCoMo, while substantially reducing token usage, API calls, and runtime compared to prior memory systems.

Abstract:
Relation extraction represents a fundamental component in the process of creating knowledge graphs, among other applications. Large language models (LLMs) have been adopted as a promising tool for relation extraction, both in supervised and in-context learning settings. However, in this work we show that their performance still lags behind much smaller architectures when the linguistic graph underlying a text has great complexity. To demonstrate this, we evaluate four LLMs against a graph-based parser on six relation extraction datasets with sentence graphs of varying sizes and complexities. Our results show that the graph-based parser increasingly outperforms the LLMs, as the number of relations in the input documents increases. This makes the much lighter graph-based parser a superior choice in the presence of complex linguistic graphs.

Abstract:
Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) offers substantial efficiency gains for transformer inference but introduces hardware-induced noise that can distort attention behavior. Prior studies primarily focus on AIMC evaluations for vision tasks and CNN-based models. They largely overlook how hardware-induced noise perturbs internal attention dynamics in NLP models. In this work, we present the first fine-grained analysis of analog vulnerability in pretrained transformers, examining projection submodules, attention heads, and layer-wise dynamics across multiple NLP tasks. Results show that query (Q), key (K), and value (V) projections are the most sensitive components, while feed-forward layers remain comparatively robust. Also, analog noise yields depth-dependent degradation in higher layers, leading to scattered attention and disrupted token routing. This pre-deployment analysis mitigates potential resource misuse before physical deployment and offers practical guidance for designing noise-resilient analog NLP transformers.

Abstract:
Language models (LMs) are pre-trained on raw text datasets to generate text sequences token-by-token. While this approach facilitates the learning of world knowledge and reasoning, it does not explicitly optimize for linguistic competence. To bridge this gap, we propose L2T, a pre-training framework integrating Language Learning Tasks alongside standard next-token prediction. Inspired by human language acquisition, L2T transforms raw text into structured input-output pairs to provide explicit linguistic stimulation. Pre-training LMs on a mixture of raw text and L2T data not only improves overall performance on linguistic competence benchmarks but accelerates their acquisition, while maintaining competitive performance on general reasoning tasks.

Abstract:
Textual humor is enormously diverse and computational studies need to account for this range, including intentionally bad humor. In this paper, we curate and analyze a novel corpus of sentences from the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest to better understand "bad" humor in English. Standard humor detection models perform poorly on our corpus, and an analysis of literary devices finds that these sentences combine features common in existing humor datasets (e.g., puns, irony) with metaphor, metafiction and simile. LLMs prompted to synthesize contest-style sentences imitate the form but exaggerate the effect by over-using certain literary devices, and including far more novel adjective-noun bigrams than human writers.

Abstract:
When an AI assistant remembers that Sarah is a single mother working two jobs, does it interpret her stress differently than if she were a wealthy executive? As personalized AI systems increasingly incorporate long-term user memory, understanding how this memory shapes emotional reasoning is critical. We investigate how user memory affects emotional intelligence in large language models (LLMs) by evaluating 15 models on human validated emotional intelligence tests. We find that identical scenarios paired with different user profiles produce systematically divergent emotional interpretations. Across validated user-independent emotional scenarios and diverse user profiles, systematic biases emerged in several high-performing LLMs where advantaged profiles received more accurate emotional interpretations. Moreover, LLMs demonstrate significant disparities across demographic factors in emotion understanding and supportive recommendations tasks, indicating that personalization mechanisms can embed social hierarchies into models’ emotional reasoning. These results highlight a key challenge for memory-enhanced AI: systems designed for personalization may inadvertently reinforce social inequalities.

Abstract:
Large Language Model agents can seeminglyplan and act, yet their language use is oftentreated primarily as an interface for instructingactions and reporting results. We argue that thisframing is one important cause of recurrent coordination failures in human-facing and multiagent settings, including ungrounded assumptions, silent goal misalignment, brittle protocoladherence, and failures to maintain or updateshared dialogue state over time, a limitation previously linked to the absence of explicit common ground tracking in collaborative systems(Geib et al., 2022). Drawing from classical dialogue system research on joint action, commonground, grounding, repair, and incremental processing, we re-frame dialogue as part of theplanning loop itself (rather than its output). Wedistill this re-framing into concrete implicationsfor agentic architecture and evaluation, including explicit representations of shared commitments, clarification as a first class action available to the policy, and process metrics that approximate grounding behavior, repair, and commitment formation rather than task completionalone. We lastly discuss how dialogue-centeredrequirements can inform standards and governance for safe deployment of agentic systems.

Abstract:
Search-engine date filters are widely used to enforce pre-cutoff retrieval in retrospective evaluations of search-augmented forecasters. We show this approach is unreliable across two major search engines: auditing Google Search’s before: filter and DuckDuckGo’s date-range filter, we find that at least one retrieved page contains major post-cutoff leakage for 71% of questions on Google and 81% on DuckDuckGo, and the answer is directly revealed for 41% and 55%, respectively. Using gpt-oss-120b to forecast with these leaky documents, we demonstrate inflated prediction accuracy (Brier score 0.10 vs. 0.24 with leak-free documents). We characterize recurring leakage mechanisms, including updated articles, related-content modules, unreliable metadata, and absence-based signals, and argue that date-restricted search on these engines is insufficient for credible retrospective evaluation. We recommend stronger retrieval safeguards or evaluation on frozen, time-stamped web snapshots.

Abstract:
Replicating AI research is a crucial yet challenging task for large language model (LLM) agents. Existing approaches often struggle to generate executable code, primarily due to insufficient background knowledge and the limitations of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods, which fail to capture latent technical details hidden in referenced papers. Furthermore, previous approaches tend to overlook valuable implementation-level code signals and lack structured knowledge representations that support multi-granular retrieval and reuse. To overcome these challenges, we propose Executable Knowledge Graphs (xKG), a pluggable, paper-centric knowledge base that automatically integrates code snippets and technical insights extracted from scientific literature. When integrated into three agent frameworks with two different LLMs, xKG shows substantial performance gains (10.9% with o3-mini) on PaperBench, demonstrating its effectiveness as a general and extensible solution for automated AI research replication.

Abstract:
Non-autoregressive (NAR) models have been mainly developed to improve decoding efficiency. Lately, they have also shown great potential in controlled text generation tasks. In this work, we investigate the decoding space of NAR models through lexically constrained machine translation tasks, and develop a search-based decoding algorithm named LexMAP, which is comparable to the autoregressive Grid Beam Search (GBS) method. Our analysis reveals several interesting properties of NAR decoding: 1) the NAR-based method does not suffer from the MAP degradation issue as the autoregressive method does; 2) AR beam search exhibits strong positional bias, in which the candidates only diverge at the end of the sequence; 3) NAR search explores a larger portion of the probability space, suggesting that the search algorithm better exploits the model’s potential.

Abstract:
While full-duplex speech agents enable natural, low-latency interaction by speaking and listening simultaneously, their consistency and task performance in multi-turn settings remain underexplored. We introduce Full-Duplex-Bench-v2 (FDB-v2), a streaming framework that integrates with an automated examiner that enforces staged goals under two pacing setups (Fast vs. Slow). FDB-v2 covers four task families—Daily, Correction, Entity Tracking, and Safety—and reports turn-taking fluency, multi-turn instruction following, and task-specific competence. The framework is extensible, supporting both commercial APIs and open-source models. When we test full-duplex systems with FDB-v2, they often get confused when people talk at the same time, struggle to handle corrections smoothly, and sometimes lose track of who or what is being talked about. Through an open-source, standardized streaming protocol and a task set, FDB-v2 makes it easy to extend to new task families, allowing the community to tailor and accelerate evaluation of multi-turn full-duplex systems.

Abstract:
The landscape of extremely low-resource machine translation (MT) is characterized by perplexing variability in reported performance, often making results across different language pairs difficult to contextualize. For researchers focused on specific language groups—such as ancient languages—it is nearly impossible to determine if breakthroughs reported in other contexts (e.g., African or American languages) result from superior methodologies or are merely artifacts of benchmark collection. To address this, we introduce the FRED Difficulty Metrics — Fertility Ratio (F) , Retrieval Proxy ( R ) Pre-training Exposure ( E ) and Corpus Diversity ( D ) —that serve as dataset-intrinsic metrics to contextualize reported scores. Our findings reveal that a significant portion of result variability is explained by train-test overlap and pre-training exposure rather than model capability. Additionally, we identify that underperforming XLR languages—particularly extinct and non-Latin indigenous languages—suffer from poor tokenization coverage (high token fertility), highlighting structural limitations of transfer learning for languages outside pre-trained models’ representation space. By providing these indices alongside performance scores, we enable more transparent evaluation of cross-lingual transfer and provide a more reliable foundation for the XLR MT community.

Abstract:
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are a canonical way to assess a machine learning model’s privacy properties. Although several attempts have been made to evaluate MIAs on language models, the extant literature has suffered numerous difficulties in constructing clean evaluations to test new techniques. In particular, subtle distribution shifts between member and non-member sets can undermine the statistical validity of MIAs; recent work has underscored this by showing that “blind” methods with no access to the underlying model can perform far better than published methods on the same benchmarks. This paper constructs a benchmark for principled evaluation of MIAs against LLMs, by leveraging the insight that training data before and after a fixed point during training are drawn from the same distribution. Therefore, all open-source models with intermediate checkpoints and public training data can be converted into MIA testbeds. We apply our framework to a half-dozen published attacks on the Pythia and OLMo family of models, from 70M to 7B parameters. To facilitate further privacy research, we open-source a modular library for designing and implementing attacks in this setting: https://github.com/safr-ai-lab/pandora_llm.

Abstract:
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to make visual content accessible via text-based descriptions. In current systems, however, description specificity is often conflated with their length. We argue that these two concepts must be disentangled: descriptions can be concise yet dense with information, or lengthy yet vacuous. We define specificity relative to a contrast set, where a description is more specific to the extent that it picks out the target image better than other possible images. We construct a dataset that controls for length while varying information content, and validate that people reliably prefer more specific descriptions regardless of length. We find that controlling for length alone cannot account for differences in specificity; it matters how the length budget is applied. These results support evaluation approaches that directly prioritize specificity over verbosity.

Abstract:
Multimodal abductive reasoning — the generation and selection of explanatory hypotheses from partial observations — is a cornerstone of intelligence. Current evaluations of such ability in vision–language models (VLMs) are largely confined to static, single-agent tasks. Inspired by Dixit, we introduce DixitWorld, a comprehensive evaluation suite designed to deconstruct this challenge. DixitWorld features two core components: DixitArena, a dynamic, multi-agent environment that evaluates both hypothesis generation (a "storyteller" crafting cryptic clues) and hypothesis selection ("listeners" choosing the target image from decoys) under imperfect information; and DixitBench, a static QA benchmark that isolates the listener’s task for efficient, controlled evaluation. Results from DixitArena reveal distinct, role-dependent behaviors: smaller open-source models often excel as creative storytellers, producing imaginative yet less discriminative clues, whereas larger proprietary models demonstrate superior overall performance, particularly as listeners. Performance on DixitBench strongly correlates with listener results in DixitArena, validating it as a reliable proxy for hypothesis selection. Our findings reveal a key trade-off between generative creativity and discriminative understanding in multimodal abductive reasoning, a central challenge for developing more balanced and capable vision-language agents.

Abstract:
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative training without raw data sharing, but still risks training data memorization. Existing FL memorization detection techniques focus on one sample at a time, underestimating more subtle risks of cross-sample memorization. In contrast, recent work on centralized learning (CL) has introduced fine-grained methods to assess memorization across all samples in training data, but these assume centralized access to data and cannot be applied directly to FL. We bridge this gap by proposing a framework that quantifies both intra- and inter-client memorization in FL using fine-grained cross-sample memorization measurement across all clients. Based on this framework, we conduct two studies: (1) measuring subtle memorization across clients and (2) examining key factors that influence memorization, including decoding strategies, prefix length, and FL algorithms. Our findings reveal that FL models do memorize client data, particularly intra-client data, more than inter-client data, with memorization influenced by training and inferencing factors.

Abstract:
Classifier-based Quality Filtering has recently emerged as a fundamental technique in constructing pre-training corpora. The ability to deploy a single model that can replace or supplement a set of heuristics has proven effective across numerous Large Language Models. In this work, we expose a critical vulnerability in this approach by demonstrating how a straightforward Wikipedia-style reformatting operation can substantially alter a model’s quality assessment and enable low-quality content to surpass filtering thresholds. Our analysis reveals that the FineWeb-Edu CQF model would reverse its filtering decision for approximately 7% of evaluated documents, thereby admitting content into the pre-training corpus that would otherwise have been excluded.

Abstract:
Transformers commonly exhibit an attention sink: disproportionately high attention to the first position. We study this behavior in GPT-2–style models with learned query biases and absolute positional embeddings. Combining structural analysis with causal interventions, validated across natural-language, mathematical, and code inputs, we find that the sink arises from the interaction among (i) a learned query bias, (ii) the first-layer MLP transformation of the positional encoding, and (iii) structure in the key projection. Crucially, each component we identify is individually dispensable: architectures omitting each of them robustly exhibit sinks. This indicates that attention sinks may arise through distinct circuits across architectures. These findings inform mitigation of sinks, and motivate broader investigation into why sinks emerges.

Abstract:
Evaluation of modern large language model (LLM) systems increasingly relies on multi-stage pipelines such as retrieval-augmented generation, tool-using agents, and prompt chains. Reproducing reported evaluation results for these systems often requires evaluation-specific artifacts beyond model weights and datasets, including prompts, judge configurations, retrieval snapshots, and intermediate traces, yet their availability has not been systematically examined.We introduce ReproEvalCard , a lightweight reporting standard that specifies the minimal artifacts required to reproduce and validate evaluations of LLM pipelines. To motivate this standard, we audit 55 pipeline-based LLM papers published between 2022 and 2025 and quantify the availability of reproducibility-critical evaluation artifacts. We find that randomness controls are missing in 75% of papers and intermediate execution traces in 61%, substantially limiting evaluation reproducibility. We further demonstrate ReproEvalCard through a worked example and provide a concise checklist for authors and reviewers, aiming to improve reproducibility and comparability in LLM evaluation.

Abstract:
Analyses of parasocial cues in live-stream chats require accurate, efficient, and scalable annotation. However, manual annotation is tedious, and large language models (LLMs) often make mistakes when applying subjective, discourse-dependent labels. This study proposes Context-aware Batching for Stream Annotation with LLMs (CaBSALLM), an efficient pipeline that incorporates lightweight conversational context and a novel dynamic batching method to improve throughput and scalability. Compared with state-of-the-art pipelines, this generalizable approach is significantly more time- and cost-efficient while achieving comparable or better predictive performance and agreement.

Abstract:
Evaluating Question Answering (QA) systems in low-resource Indic languages remains challenging due to the scarcity of annotated data, high linguistic diversity, and the absence of reliable evaluation metrics. Many Indian languages are severely underrepresented, making it difficult to accurately assess the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on QA tasks. Commonly used metrics like BLEU, ROUGE-L, and BERTScore, while successful in machine translation and resource-rich scenarios, tend to perform poorly in low-resource QA settings. These metrics often exhibit issues such as compressed scoring ranges, excessive zero scores, and weak alignment with human judgments. To overcome these limitations, this work introduces the LRM 2 QAS (Language Robust Multi-aspect Metrics for Question Answering Systems). This composite evaluation framework integrates semantic similarity, factual completeness, numerical accuracy, and contextual relevance. The proposed metric is evaluated across eight Indic-language QA tasks using multiple LLMs, as well as on open-domain benchmarks NaturalQuestions (NQ) and TriviaQA (TQ). Across all settings, LRM 2 QAS demonstrates stronger agreement with human evaluation, as measured by Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlation coefficients. Experimental findings highlight that LRM 2 QAS provides more precise distinctions between model outputs and aligns more closely with human judgment, offering a reliable framework for evaluating multilingual QA in low-resource Indic languages.

Abstract:
We present T ⋆ , a simple TraceRL-based curriculum for progressive block-size scaling in masked diffusion language models (MDMs).Starting from an AR-initialized small-block MDM, T ⋆ gradually increases the block size while re-optimizing the denoising policy at each stage, enabling higher-parallelism decoding with limited degradation on math reasoning benchmarks. Across two SDAR scales and three benchmarks, T ⋆ consistently outperforms direct large-block TraceRL and is substantially more stable during training. Our schedule analysis suggests that the learned policy does not simply revert to a strictly left-to-right order; instead, it retains block-size-specific non-monotone updates while improving accuracy.

Abstract:
Figurative language recognition poses significant challenges in NLP, particularly when distinguishing between fine-grained rhetorical categories such as metaphor, metonymy, and simile. This paper formulates the problem as a four-way sentence-level classification task and proposes FL-MSCL, a unified framework integrating prompt-based knowledge injection with supervised contrastive learning. Experiments across both unified and single-class benchmarks demonstrate that FL-MSCL achieves competitive performance compared to State-of-the-Art (SOTA) methods, indicating consistent advantages in cross-category generalization and category-specific detection.

Abstract:
Safe clinical deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) requires not only high accuracy but also robust uncertainty calibration to ensure models defer to clinicians when appropriate. Our paper investigates how social descriptors of a patient (specifically sexual orientation and religious affiliation) distort these uncertainty signals and model accuracy. Evaluating nine general-purpose and biomedical LLMs on 2,364 medical questions and their counterfactual variants, we demonstrate that identity markers cause a "calibration crisis". Homosexual markers consistently trigger performance drops, and intersectional identities produce idiosyncratic, non-additive harms to calibration. Moreover, a clinician-validated case study in an open-ended generation setting confirms that these failures are not an artifact of the multiple-choice format. Our results demonstrate that the presence of social identity cues does not merely shift predictions; it affects the reliability of confidence signals, posing a significant risk to equitable care and safe deployment in confidence-based clinical workflows.

Abstract:
Effective biomedical information retrieval requires modeling domain semantics and hierarchical relationships among biomedical texts. Existing biomedical generative retrievers built on coarse binary relevance signals, limiting their ability to capture semantic overlap. We propose BioHiCL - Biomedical Retrieval with Hierarchical Multi-Label Contrastive Learning, which leverages hierarchical MeSH annotations to provide structured supervision for multi-label contrastive learning. Our models, BioHiCL-Base (0.1B) and BioHiCL-Large (0.3B), achieve promising performance on biomedical retrieval, sentence similarity, and question answering tasks, while remaining computationally efficient for deployment.